[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_90

Title:OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid
Notice:Please review note 1.83 before writing anything.
Moderator:VAXWRK::NEEDLE
Created:Thu Dec 14 1989
Last Modified:Fri Dec 17 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:438
Total number of notes:50420

27.0. "**** BIG-8 SPORTS ****" by POGO::REED (Oklahoma State athletic supporter) Fri Dec 15 1989 12:00

    This space is reserved for the discussion of BIG-8 SPORTS.  Any
    non-BIG-8 recruits are welcome if they are house-broke.
    
    Cowboy
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
27.1BBall gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Dec 15 1989 12:0521
    BBall RESULTS:
    
    Nebraska 83
    Creighton 86
    
    Kansas State 75
    Tulsa 69
    
    
    
    TODAYS GAMES:
    
    Bradley at Missouri
    Minnesota at Kansas State
    N. Iowa at Iowa State
    Oklahoma State at Tulsa
    Pepperdine at Kansas
    
    Cowboy
    
    
27.2Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big-Eight...WOODRO::GORDONMon Dec 18 1989 12:091
    and MIZZOU just keeps on winning...amd winning...and winning....
27.3BBall gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Dec 19 1989 18:3327
    BBALL RESULTS:
    
    Kansas 98
    Pepperdine 73
    
    Kansas State 68
    Minnesota 69
    
    Missouri 86
    Bradley 77
    
    Oklahoma State 80 (OT)
    Tulsa 95
    
    Iowa State 92
    Iowa 80
    
    
    NEXT:
    
    Texas Southern at Oklahoma State
    
    Missouri vs. Illinois at St. Louis Arena
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.4Bowl PredictionsCSC32::M_HENDERSONCelts of '86 - Greatest EverTue Dec 19 1989 18:3449
    Fiesta Bowl
    
       Hard one to pick. I dont know what the line is or if the line is out
       yet. Nebraska has not recieved respect this year because of schedule.
       Possibly that is as it should be. However, Nebraska is a legit top 5
       team in my opinion. I'm sure the Colorado Clippers would agree and I
       know from quotes that the Oklahoma sooners agree.
    
       Fla State crushed Miami. This makes it hard to pick Nebraska.
       However picking according to how teams beat other teams is many
       times not a good barometer.
    
       Based on Nebraska's more diversified offense this year, (Gdowski
       has given them a passing game) I'll pick Nebraska by a small margin.
       This is mostly from the heart though as I know little about FSU
       except that they beat Miami and Bowden is a truely great coach.
    
    Nebraska     28
    FSU          24
    
    Orange Bowl
    
       Colorado has earned respect. And rightfully so. They have had a
       tough schedule and are undefeated with a huge 'special teams' win
       over Nebraska.
    
       However, in my opinion Colorado had been playing 'a bit' over their
       heads this year because of their using the death of Sal for emotion.
       They had big problems moving the ball against Nebraska outside of
       one big play and would not be in the Orange bowl if not for the 2
       punt returns and a few refs who are blind to clips.
    
       However, they did what it took to win and thats been the name of the
       game for CU. Notre Dame will be at least at tough as Nebraska and
       this game will not be at Boulder. Notre Dame may have gotten soundly
       beaten by Miami but they have immense pride and a very strong fan
       following. They will bounce back for this game. There will be no ND
       letup. Holtz will find something to get his team up with. I truely
       do believe that the Buffs are up against it here. If the Buffs can
       use Sal once more they may pull off a win and a national
       championship but I wouldent count on it.
    
    Colorado 17
    ND       24
    
    
    Now I've done it. I have virtually guarantee'd FSU and CU wins.
    
    						Nebraska Marty 
27.5BSS::RIGGENBronco's Best in AFC ?Tue Dec 19 1989 18:469
    The Line on the Fiesta is Fla St. 3.5 
    
    On the Orange ND 1.5 over CU. 
    
    
    Jeff
    
    
    
27.6Sorry Marty, but these are the correct scores....POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Dec 19 1989 18:4623
    The Denver Post has the following line:
    
    Florida State 4 over Nebraska
    
    Notre Dame 1^ over Colorado
    
    
    I'll have to go with FSU over Nebraska because of NU's loosy Big-game
    record and the fact that FSU usually seems to be underrated and over-
    looked.  Colorado looks too much like the better Sooner teams--the
    confidence to win against anyone.  It doesn't matter if they're against
    a better team or not--CU will still win the game.  ND is mortal--they
    can be beaten and have been already.
    
    Florida State 31
    Nebraska 17
    
    Colorado 24
    Notre Dame 21
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.7GENRAL::WADEgimme 3 stepsTue Dec 19 1989 20:2618
    Marty,
    
    	I don't think Sal's death is the only thing that motivated
    	CU.  You keep mentioning it like that is the only reason
    	they won all their games this year.  I believe they wanted
    	to win all those games more for themselves than for him.
    	I'm not saying his death wasn't a factor.  It's just gets 
    	old hearing people say that they are using his death to
    	win their games.  They're not!  They're winning those games
    	with the right mental attitude and their physical abilities.
    	There's no divine spirit looking over them!  They went out
    	on the field 11 times this year.  They won all 11 games by
    	playing better than the other team and nothing else.......
    
    	I contend that they could have gone undefeated without him
    	dying.  But, that is pure speculation........
    
    Claybone
27.8BBall gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Dec 20 1989 11:2320
    BBall RESULTS:
    
    Oklahoma State 79
    Texas Southern 77
    
    
    
    TODAY:
    
    Missouri vs. Illinois at St. Louis Arena
    
    
    
    FRIDAY:
    
    Arizona State at Kansas
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.9A better explanation of the Sal thing...CSC32::M_HENDERSONCelts of '86 - Greatest EverWed Dec 20 1989 12:5346
    re: .7
    
    Claybone, I dont mean to make it sound like CU's talent has had nothing
    to do with success this year. It has to a great extent. That cant be
    deny'd.
    
    All I'm saying is that emotion is a huge part of football. It's an
    emotional game. The Sal thing has given them an added extra emotional
    edge and they are milking it for all it worth. I'm also not saying that
    the feelings the CU players and staff have for Sal are made up. Sal was
    of questionable moral character (Arested for something not too long ago
    and got the coaches daughter pregnent illigitimatily) but he was the
    type of person that everybody liked. The CU players loved him very
    much.
    
    weather or not CU would have been undefeated without the passing of
    Sal will, of course, never be known. I personaly believe that the
    "magic" atmosphere that this has created has propelled CU beyond the
    physical capabilities of the team. It has transformed a good and
    talented team into a team on a mission. Extra mental toughness. And
    mental toughness is the thing which seperates great teams from 
    championship teams. It remains to be seen if CU can keep up this edge
    playing in the always tough Orange bowl against a recent powerhouse.
    I personal believe that if the Nebraska game were played at nebraska
    that the Huskers would have won. Now it's ND in the orange bowl. I'm
    sorry but I just dont think CU will win this game. It would be great
    for the Big-8 if they did.
    
    One theory that has been thrown out about Nebraska is that they lack
    that mental edge due to Coach Osborne's unemotional stature. This may
    have truth to it. When Bob Devany (A legand in Nebraska) was coach
    NU won back to back national championships. Devany was a firey
    emotional, kick butt kind of coach. His offensive coordinator was
    Tom Osborne. Osborne called ALL the offensive shots while Devany
    fired up the team. Thus - back to back in '70 and '71. Glorious !!!
    
    I think NU is also up against it in the Fiesta. Bowden is a great
    coach and he dosent believe all this krap about Nebraska not really
    being that good this year because of the schedule. He knows about
    Nebraska. He has, I think, 2 wins over NU in the 80's but these were
    close, hair of your chinny chin chin wins. He's also been litterly
    blown out by the Huskers 2 or 3 times in the 80's. He wont be taking
    the Huskers lightly. I do think NU will pull it out. I have a lot of
    confidence in Gdowski.
    
    						Nebraska Marty
27.11POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Dec 20 1989 13:3015
    The CU players probably have handled Sal's death the way *They*
    wanted to.  Obviously, it wasn't handled the way the Husker press
    thought it should be and I can't see that what the Huskers think
    about it really matters.  Since NU lost to CU most of the griping
    is about the Sal thing and that a overachieving CU won because
    of *phoney* emotions.  Personally, I can't see any truth to the
    NU talk.  Is this CU team really overrated?  What did they do
    last year in Nebraska?  CU dropped the ball on the way to a TD
    to tie the game.  It looks to me that CU *CAN* compete with the
    *mighty bugeaters* and have shown it.
    
    CU *can't* compete with NU when it comes to excuses and complaints.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.12You miss the whole point...CSC32::M_HENDERSONCelts of '86 - Greatest EverWed Dec 20 1989 14:1536
    re: -1
    
    Cowboy,
    
    Yes, CU dropped the ball while in the open running toward a TD last
    year. But NU also fumbled on CU's 1 yard line while going in for a TD.
    It's a wash. I was at the game.
    
    Your right, NU fans are #1 for whining and excuses. But that's all out
    of frustration because we are sssooooooooo close every year and yes,
    I'll admit it, choke every year. But at least the Huskers are "there"
    every year and have a shot at it. One of these years its got go come
    together. Law of averages.
    
    The CU fans are no better for their excessive hatred toward NU as the
    result of being blown away for so many years. It's only natural on
    both sides.
    
    And your wrong on your emphisis about what the NU fans are miffed
    about regarding the NU/CU game. The Sal thing is a minor point with
    Husker fans. The thing that REALLY REALLY pi$$ed NU fans, players, and
    coaches off was the 2 missed obvious clipps on each of the 2 punt
    returns. The following week when NU played Kansas at NU, half of the
    reff crew were the same reffs that did the CU game. The NU fans boo's
    the reffs without mercy the whole game. When the Huskers came out of
    the locker room to start the game they got a tremendous ovation.
    
    My only point in bringing up the Sal thing was to state that I believe
    that has been the thing which, added to CU's talent, has placed them
    over the top (so far) to where they are now. This has been that
    "intangable" factor that NU has not been able to find. It as been the
    difference maker for an already compettitve team. I fail to see what
    is insulting about that. ??? !!!
    
    						Nebraska Marty
    
27.13GENRAL::WADEgimme 3 stepsWed Dec 20 1989 14:2218
    Milking Sal's death?  That's a pretty harsh statement don't
    you think?  You've been reading too many Nebraska newspapers.
    Face it, Big Red fans could't handle defeat so they resort to
    belittling the CU players by saying they USED his death as 
    some sort of mental springboard.  That's low..............
    
    Sal had his share of scrapes with the law.  I think the majority
    of young men do!  He also got a girl pregnant.  You could accuse
    of him of not using good judgement regarding birth control.  The
    girl could be accused of this as well.  But, does this equate to
    his moral character being questionable?  I think not.  He was no
    saint, but, neither are 99.99999999999% of the people in this
    world.
    
    You're right about footbal being an emotional game.  You're wrong
    about CU "milking Sal's death".
    
    Claybone
27.14POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Dec 20 1989 14:4532
    Every winning team has to have a winning attitude.  You (and the
    Nebraska press) make it sound like CU was looking for a good
    way to get the team's attitude right for winning and decided
    that they would use Sal's death:
    
     >> The Sal thing has given them an added extra emotional
     >> edge and they are milking it for all it worth.
    
    I can't argue that:
    
     >> The Sal thing has given them an added extra emotional
     >> edge
    
    but:
    
     >>      and they are milking it for all it worth. 
     
    is a statement that both cold-blooded obviously sour grapes.
    
    If NU is so tired of choking in the big games and is always
    so close to the national championship then why don't they
    do something about it?  Get rid of Osborn if he can't fire
    up the team.  NU has one of the best football programs around
    don't they?  Don't they have a red-shirt program that has as
    many coaches, as much money spent, etc, as many *varsity*
    programs have?  Why don't NU fans quit their crying and do
    something that will eliminate the problems?  Just because NU
    chokes every years doesn't mean that they should be able to
    bitch and moan every year.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.15GENRAL::GIBSONWed Dec 20 1989 14:4721
    	
    I'm not exactly a CU fan but have stuck up for them this year. They
    have a heck of a team but don't get the credit they deserve. Like I
    said before, the NU game was the worse CU played all year.
    Unfortunatly, that is the game the nation saw. I agree that the
    milking his death for all it's worth comment was very crude and down
    right ridiculous. Yes, a big deal has been made of it. But believe it
    or not when they are on the field they have other things on their minds
    than a friend and team-mate that passed away. His death certainly was
    not unexpected, after he was diagnosed as having inoperable cancer. Yes
    he did get in trouble a couple of times. How many of you in here never
    got into any kind of trouble when you were about 20 years old? (Or just
    didn't get caught?) Yes, he got the coaches daughter pregnant. Big
    freakin' deal! How many girls get pregnant in this country every single
    day without, heaven forbid, being married? Of course it wasn't any of
    her fault. I bet you don't know that several people took blood tests to
    determine who the father was. Sal Aunese was no saint but some of you
    Nebraska people ripping him up because CU beat NU is sickening.
    
                                                    HOOT
    
27.16The cryin' never stopsNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 20 1989 17:0031
    
    Don't take him seriously, guys.  Marty has a well-documented problem
    handing out credit without rescinding it in the very next paragraph 
    with some derogatory term like "clippers", "milkers", or "cheaters"
    (not necessarily limited to Colorado, either, as I have learned).  
    It's almost as if he means well when he starts his notes but then 
    the years of bitterness well up inside him and overtake him.
    
    I honestly believe that the Aunese tragedy had little more to do with
    Colorado's success than the fact that it placed a more talented QB in
    charge of the offense.  It may have provided inspiration to the lives
    of individual team members in the way they approach their individual
    lives, but once they hit the field it's football, not a prayer service.
    How many times have we heard you yourself, Marty, say that "Aunese
    may have carried the overachieving Colorado this far, but once they run
    up against (insert one: Oklahoma/Nebraska/Notre Dame) they'll be in
    over their heads."  And then it never happens.  Marty, you're the only 
    person in here stirring up the mud with the Aunese business, which is
    the very same reason for which you're criticizing both Colorado and the 
    media.  If and when Colorado finally loses (maybe sometime next year, 
    even) are we going to have to hear you tell us "I told you so, the 
    Aunese magic has finally worn off"?
    
    A challenge to Marty: if Colorado knocks off Notre Dame for the
    National Championship, are you willing to cease and desist with the
    clippers/milkers/questional-moral-character crap and give the Buffs 
    the credit they deserve for their performance *as the best* in the
    country this year?
    
    glenn
     
27.17OK guys, calm down already...CSC32::M_HENDERSONCelts of '86 - Greatest EverWed Dec 20 1989 18:3537
    Alright, lets end all this bull-krap !!!
    
    I made the statement (Milking...) in regards to useing something to 
    get the team up. That this has been CU's "extra edge" to TO GO WITH
    THEIR TALENT.
    
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
           "TO GO WITH THEIR TALENT"
    
    
    How many times do I have to say this so you will hear what I am really
    saying. I did state that I believe the CU emotions were genuine. Maybee
    this will help. If, God forbid, a prominant Husker player died, the NU
    team would do the same thing.
    
    I simply stated that this added edge has propelled CU beyond their
    normal physical abilites. It would any team. It natural. This is no
    cut. You guys are way over sensitive.
    
    As far as the comments about NU changing things. Possibly firing coach
    Osborne. I agree. Something needs to change. After 18 years straigt
    finishing top-10 (A streak which could possibly end if NU looses to
    FSU), getting top-10 again is like kissing your sister. Something
    needs to be done.
    
    But think about it. How many programs would fire the coach after a
    decade in which their team had the winningist record overall and
    finished top-10 every year? Not many, and it wont happen at nebraska.
    Unfortunately, nothing will change soon at Nebraska.
    
    					Nebraska Marty
27.18If CU gets over this last hump, #1 no doubt !!!CSC32::M_HENDERSONCelts of '86 - Greatest EverWed Dec 20 1989 18:4314
    re: .16
    
    Absalutely Glen. If CU wins the natl championship over ND in the Orange
    Bowl I will be a believer.
    
    The name stuff works both ways. Bugeaters started in here long before
    clippers. And you know what, go back to the old file. I dident start
    clippers. I picked up on if from another noter who is not seen to often
    here. I have even on many occasions called NU the Bugeaters which I 
    think is just as stupid and funny as NU's maskot - Harry Husker.
    
    You guys are over reacting way too much.
    
    					Nebraska Marty
27.19Sal Knocked up his first daughterBSS::RIGGENSteamboat 104inches newWed Dec 20 1989 18:458
    Come-on Marty....
    
    The real reason that the CU team is pumped up that McCartney has
    promised his second daughter to the Orange Bowl MVP.
    
    That's the "EXTRA EDGE"
    
    Jeff 
27.20POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Dec 20 1989 19:059
    Gee whiz Marty, you should be proud of Cornhusker heritage.  Since
    NU's nickname actually was the the "Bugeaters" you shouldn't take
    it as an insult.  I've heard the Cowboys called "the Aggies" more
    times than their real name and always beam with pride.  (OSU was
    "The Oklahoma A & M Aggies")  There's chills going down my spine
    right now!
    
    Cowboy (tearfully)
    
27.21gamePOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Dec 21 1989 12:099
    BBall RESULTS:
    
    #4 Missouri 93
    #5 Illinois 101
    
    (U of M's first loss)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.22one hell of a team!!!POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Dec 21 1989 12:3541
    			    BIG-8 ALL-DECADE TEAM
    
    1ST TEAM OFFENSE    		1ST TEAM DEFENSE
    
    QB-Turner Gill	Nebraska       	DT-Rick Bryan		Oklahoma
    WR-Hart Lee Dykes	Oklahoma State 	DT-Leslie O'Neal	Oklahoma St
    OG-Dean Steinkuhler	Nebraska       	NG-Tony Casillas	Oklahoma
    OG-Anthony Phillips	Oklahoma       	DE-Broderick Thomas	Nebraska
     C-Dave Rimington	Nebraska     	DE-Darrell Reed		Oklahoma 	
    OT-John Clay	Missouri       	LB-Willie Pless		Kansas
    OT-Karl Nelson	Iowa State     	LB-Brian Bosworth	Oklahoma
    TE-Keith Jackson	Oklahoma     	DB-Mark Moore		Oklahoma St
    RB-Barry Sanders 	Oklahoma State 	DB-Rickey Dixon		Oklahoma
    RB-Mike Rozier	Nebraska      	DB-Mickey Pruitt	Colorado
    RB-Thurman Thomas	Oklahoma State 	DB-Eric McMillan	Missouri
    PK-Larry Roach	Oklahoma State 	 P-Barry Helton		Colorado
    KR-Irving Fryar	Nebraska
    
    
    HONORABLE MENTION
    
    OFFENSE				DEFENSE
    
    OT-Conrad Goode	Missouri        DE-Neil Smith		Nebraska
    OT-Howard Richards	Missouri       	DE-Kevin Murphy		Oklahoma
    OG-Mark Hutson	Oklahoma       	DL-Danny Noonan		Nebraska
    OG-Paul Blair	Oklahoma State	LB-Kanavis McGhee	Colorado
    WR-David Verser	Kansas       	LB-Jimmy Williams	Nebraska
    RB-Dwayne Crutchfield Iowa State 	LB-Ricky Young		Oklahoma St
    QB-Jamelle Holieway	Oklahoma        LB-Mark Munford		Nebraska
    QB-Mike Gundy	Oklahoma State  LB-Dante Jones		Oklahoma
    PK-Cary Blanchard	Oklahoma State  LB-Mike Knox		Nebraska
    PK-Tim Lashar	Oklahoma        DB-Adrian Jones		Missouri
    PK-Bruce Kallmeyer	Kansas       	DB-Victor Scott		Colorado
    KR-Jeff Campbell	Colorado       	DB-David Vickers	Oklahoma
    KR-Jo Jo Collins	Colorado        DB-Scott Case		Oklahoma
                                       	DB-Eric Wright		Missouri
                                        DB-Bret Clark		Nebraska
    					DB-Barton Hundley	Kansas St
    					 P-Bucky Scribner	Kansas
                            
27.23NCAA investigators saving travel $$RHETT::KNORRT-hypocrisy lives!Thu Dec 21 1989 14:1811
    If basketball had bowl games, that Missouri-Illinois game would've been
    called "The Investigation Bowl".  
    
    If they play again next year it could probably be renamed to "The
    Probation Bowl".
    
    Heh heh.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
27.24Hoops stuff...CSC32::M_HENDERSONCelts of '86 - Greatest EverThu Dec 21 1989 18:456
    I dont know about Illinois, but I do know that Mizzou is in deep water
    with the NCAA in basketball. Too bad, I like Tigers Basketball.
    
    Anybody know more details about this?
    
    						Nebraska Marty
27.25BIG-8 BBall StandingsPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Dec 26 1989 16:0414
    		BIG-8 BBall Standings  12-25-89
    
    			Conference 	All games
    			W   L   Pct	W   L   Pct
    
    	Kansas		0   0   .000	11  0   1.000
    	Oklahoma	0   0   .000	 5  0   1.000
    	Missouri	0   0   .000	 9  1    .900
    	Colorado	0   0   .000	 7  2    .778
    	Okla State	0   0   .000	 5  2    .714
    	Iowa State	0   0   .000	 4  4    .500
    	Kansas State	0   0   .000	 5  5    .500
    	Nebraska	0   0   .000	 4  5    .444
    
27.26next gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Dec 26 1989 16:0812
    Games tomorrow:
    
    James Madison at Oklahoma
    Missouri at Memphis State
    Pittsburgh vs. Oklahoma State in Kuppenheimer Classic
    
    Also in Kuppenheimer Classic at Atlanta-1st round
    	Morehead State vs. Georgia Tech
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.27BBall gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Dec 28 1989 11:0827
    BBall Results:
    
    Oklahoma 142
    James Madison 109
    
    Missouri 71
    Memphis State 65
    
    
    
    Kuppenheimer Classic:
    
    Oklahoma State 81
    Pittsburgh 92
    
    Georgia Tech 98
    Morehead State 76
    
    
    Today:
    
    Oklahoma State vs. Morehead State in Kuppenheimer Classic
    Austin Peay vs. Kansas State in Sun Carnival
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.28BBallPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Dec 29 1989 11:0316
    BBall Results:
    
    (for 3rd place in Kuppenheimer Classic)
    Oklahoma State 84
    Morehead State 77
    
    Next games:
    
    Kansas vs Texas-Pan American in BMA Classic
    Kansas State in Sun Carnival
    Oklahoma vs N. Texas in All-College tourney
    Colorado (-10) vs Massachusetts in Mile High Classic
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.29Big-8 Behind TimesCSC32::M_HENDERSONCelts of '86 - Greatest EverTue Jan 02 1990 02:0924
    Well, the bowl games are over and BOTH Big-8 teams loose. 
    
    The Big-8 has obviously fallen off. I noticed a patern in both the
    Orange Bowl and Fiesta Bowl. It has to do with passing. Both offense
    and defense.
    
    Neither CU or NU could stop their opponents passing game. It killed
    both teams. CU's passing game was virtually worthless against both
    ND and NU. Nebraska's passing game was better than in the past this
    year but not great. Same goes with Oklahoma. The pattern in college
    football the past few years has been that the pro sytle offenses have
    been the powerhouses. Miami, Fla State etc. Also ND has had an
    extremely balanced attack with a real good passing game.
    
    NU, OU, and CU dont defend the pass well because the Big-8 is 15 years
    behind the times. It is not a passing conference overall. Yes, there
    are a couple of teams who throw a lot, but the Big-8 is still known as
    a rushing conference.
    
    The Big-8 needs to modernize !!! Untill Osborne, McCarney, and the OU
    coach realize this we will see todays results repeated again and again
    on future Bowl days.
    
    						Nebraska Marty
27.30FSU 41 NU 17CSC32::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearTue Jan 02 1990 02:3537
    
    				Fiesta Bowl
    
    Maaaannnnn, is that FSU QB a great one. Awesome! He made the Husker
    backfield look like a bunch of cheerleaders. Willis - 421 yards, 5 TD's
    and zip interceptions. The young NU backfield was helpless. Willis was
    also very courageous bacuase he spent half the night on his back
    due to the NU line and linebackers were all over him. But this dident
    rattle him in the least. Normally if you pressure the QB like that you
    can stop the passing game. Not this guy. Can you believe Willis and
    Gdowski have sat the bench the last 3 years? Unbelievable !!!
    
    How about that first quarter. It's obvious Osborne knew he had to pull
    out all the stops to win. And Bowden came back with a roosky of his
    own. At the end of the first quarter I thought it was going to be a
    battle to the end.
    
    Then Willis took over and it dident take long to see just how good
    FSU is. I believe they would have won against anyone. They wont get
    number one but I think they are the best team in the country. You saw
    what they did to the Huskers. And while the Huskers are not as good as
    in past years, they still arent duck soup.
    
    Speaking of that, I dont think NU is a top-10 team this year. They are
    still a good team but not the traditional powerhouse people are used to
    seeing in NU. However, they are a young team by Nebraska standards.
    
    Nebraska has averaged 12 passes a game this year. Osbornes offensive
    scheme is a good one to throw from. I think that if they averaged 20
    to 25 passes a game they would be a much better team. Also they should
    work on backfield recruiting. I'm sure they will.
    
    I think you will see Osborne make some adjustments. But not any major
    changes - unfortunately. One thing is for sure: THE HUSKERS WILL BE
    BACK!!!!
    
    						Nebraska Marty
27.31ND 21 CU 6CSC32::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearTue Jan 02 1990 03:0967
    
    				Orange Bowl
    
    My condolences to you CU fans. I know the dissapointment. I know it
    first hand. I'm a Cornhusker fan so I know what it is like to have my
    team blow the national championship. The hurt afterwards is terrible.
    Thus, when I have heard the CU fans being so confident going into the
    Orange Bowl I would just shake my head with a knowing smile on my face.
    And I knew that CU being a very good but a one dimentional (Run) team
    would problably get beat. 
    
    CU played a good game. Blowing the oportunities in the first half
    killed them. You cant do that against quality teams and win in most
    cases.
    
    The obvious problem CU had was what I spoke about in .29 - passing!!
    CU's passing game was hapless and they had much trouble stopping the
    ND passing game.
    
    CU has nothing to be ashamed of. They had a great season and, yes, SAL
    would have been extremely proud of them - win or loose the Orange Bowl.
    
    	WARNING - CU fans may not want to read what follows. Just type
                  NEXT to skip it. And dont say I dident warn you if you
                  do read the rest of this note !!!
    
    
    First off, now that the season is over and SAL has been an inspiration
    to his teamates, LET THE KID DIE PLEASE. The rest of the country
    outside of Colorado is sick to death of hearing about it. Sal would
    have been proud. Now he's gone, just let him rest in peace.
    
    Holtz hit the nail right on the head with just about everything he said
    this week. He saw all the game films. He knew why CU was where they
    were. His statements about CU living a lie this season and ND taking
    over in the second half were exactly right.
    
    CU went undefeated because they have been on a mission. Win it for SAL.
    The CU fans have underestimated this. CU has played above their
    physical talent largely because of it. CU is a very good team but not
    a national champion calaber team. Holtz knew this. CU is vulnerable to
    the pass and their passing game stinks. They are way to one-dimentional
    to win the national championship.
    
    As I stated in .30, NU is not a top-10 team this year. And CU literally
    struggled to get by them AT HOME while they were flying high with
    emotion. Holtz saw whe CU NU films. He knew this.
    
    Lets face it Colorado and Nebraska fans, the Big-8 is out of stride and
    a cut below now. But we all know that what goes around, comes around.
    The Big-8 will again be a top conference but some modernization must
    take place.
    
    I still say that the best team did not represent the Big-8 in the
    Orange Bowl. But it is a moot point with Nebraskas showing against FSU.
    Again lets face it, the better Big-8 teams cant match up to the
    national powerhouses who have pro style offenses. I know that Barry
    Switzer would agree with me as he saw some of his great Okie teams
    loose to pro style Miami.
    
    CU will be back next year and will challenge for the Big-8 title again.
    However, SAL will not die again next year, the Nebraska game is in
    Lincoln, and this years young Husker squad should be better next year.
    I CANT WAIT. Bring on the Buffs!!! Go Big Red. Even though the Big Red
    has a red face now. I hope Osborne makes some big changes!!!
    
    						Nebraska Marty
27.32FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Jan 02 1990 10:408
    And for all you fans of Big 8 hoops:
    
    Friday, December 29, first round of the Mile High Classic:
    
    The University of Massachusetts 78
    The University of Colorado      71
    
    John
27.33COOKIE::CHAVEZDale - CXN Colo SpgsTue Jan 02 1990 11:2118
Re: 27.31 by CSC32::M_HENDERSON

In spite of the loss to Notre Dame, I tip my hat to the entire
CU staff.  McCartney did a hell of a job with the team all year.  They're
still a young team and will be back next year.

I'd like to think that had CU scored at least two times in the first
half, the outcome would have been different, but somehow I think
Notre Dame would still have used their experience to pull the win
out.

Notre Dame's experience in big games really came through in the second
half.   Have to give 'em credit.  However, I still disagree with Holtz'
comment about CU living a lie all year...CU was clearly the best of
the Big-8 this year...Nebraska's debacle against Florida State was
proof.

Dale
27.34POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Jan 02 1990 11:4113
    CU needed to score atleast 10 points in the first half but ended up
    with 0.  This may have been enough to keep the momentum going long
    enough to win it.  You have to give ND credit for coming out in the
    2nd half with the changes to take control of the game.
    
    *Next year* was supposed to be Colorado's year so expect to see
    them back stronger.  I expect them to be working on their passing
    game more for next year.
    
    Congrats to CU for a great year.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.35CU still OK by meFDCV07::TIRRELLLand of the Midnight SunTue Jan 02 1990 11:5517
    Yes, I have to agree with the assessment of Nebraska, not much there
    last night. I predicted in the old Sports Note a big FSU victory, I'm
    glad I wasn't wrong. 
    
    Despite the "sour grapes" from middle America, CU gave a better account
    of themselves than Nebraska would have. I hate to say it because I
    can't stand Notre Dame, but ND would have crushed Nebraska almost as
    badly as FSU did.
    
    Had the 'Buffs not blown the potential for 17 first half points, the
    outcome might have been different. I got the feeling watching the game,
    that the longer it went on, the more it favored ND.
    
    CU has nothing to be ashamed of. They had a great season, and the few
    times we were able to see them here in the east, they were fun to
    watch. My hat is off to them and their fans, and we'll be watching for
    them next year.  
27.36BIG-8 the best Bball conference?POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Jan 02 1990 12:0536
    BBall games today:
    
    Austin Peay at Missouri
    W. Kentucky at Kansas State (-13^)
    Colorado at E. Michigan (-3^)
    
    
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
                Conferences	All games
    		W  L	Pct.	W  L	Pct.
    Kansas	0  0	.000	13 0	1.000
    Oklahoma	0  0	.000	 8 0	1.000
    Missouri	0  0	.000	11 1	 .917
    Oklahoma St	0  0	.000	 6 3	 .667
    Colorado	0  0	.000	 7 4	 .636
    Iowa St	0  0	.000	 4 4	 .500
    Kansas St	0  0	.000	 6 6 	 .500
    Nebraska	0  0	.000	 5 5	 .500
    
    
    
    BIG-8 Coach's Poll:			Denver Post's Picks:
    
    1 Missouri     46 votes             1 Missouri
    2 Kansas       45                   2 Oklahoma
    3 Oklahoma	   38                   3 Kansas
    4 Oklahoma St  31                   4 Okahoma State
    5 Kansas St	   24                   5 Kansas State
    6 Colorado	   16                   6 Colorado
    7 Iowa St	   16                   7 Iowa State
    8 Nebraska	    8                   8 Nebraska
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.37As usual, the team with fewer mistakes, generally winsWORDS::NISKALAFreezing my Filberts off!Tue Jan 02 1990 13:066
    	I beg to differ on the matchup of CU/ND and FSU/NU. I think
    Nebraska matches up better with ND, due to size and strength, and
    CU better with FSU due to team speed. I had a feeling NU was going
    to be crushed, but was hoping otherwise. I still think that Miami
    and FSU are the 2 best teams in the nation. If they played each
    other 10 times, it would probably end up 5-5.
27.38FDCV07::TIRRELLLand of the Midnight SunTue Jan 02 1990 15:169
    -1
    Might be, but that assumes that Nebraska is a good football team, which
    they are not. At least a half a dozen bowl teams would have cleaned
    their clocks over and above what FSU did to them....Auburn, Miami,
    Notre Dame, Tennessee, Alabama, and Clemson come to mind. I'll even go
    a few better and add Michigan, USC, and perhaps Arkansas, and 
    Texas A&M.
    
    Marty said it all before, it's time for a change in the Big 8. 
27.39Mistakes, mistakesWORDS::NISKALAFreezing my Filberts off!Tue Jan 02 1990 17:5912
    	Given, a lot of teams would have cleaned Nebraska's clock 
    yesterday. They fumbled 5 times losing 3, and were intercepted 
    2 times. 5 turnovers are hard to overcome. Colorado could have beaten
    ND had they not made mistakes, Arkansas would have beaten Tennessee,
    the list can go on. FSU had no turnovers yesterday and would have
    beaten ANY ONE OF THE TEAMS that played yesterday. They played
    error-free ball and just dominated the Huskers plain and simple.
    	NU this year is not deserving of a top ten ranking for the first
    time in ~15 years, they couldn't beat a good team.
    There, I said it and I feel better.........
    
    Keith
27.40So. Miss. will haunt the SeminolesFDCV07::TIRRELLLand of the Midnight SunTue Jan 02 1990 18:246
    -1
    Have to agree with you. FSU probably would have beaten just about
    anyone. Their hopes for a National Championship died in the last minute
    of the game on Opening Day (their loss to Clemson the next week not
    withstanding). Only goes to show you, can't always take those opening
    day "bunnies"  for granted! 
27.41Point a finger and 4 point back at you...CSC32::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearWed Jan 03 1990 00:4416
    You cant say that Nebraska is not a "good" team. You can say they are
    not a great team and that they are not anywhere close to past Husker
    quality. You can also say that the Big-8 style of play is out-dated.
    The Huskers have lots of talent.
    
    And how can you say that any and all bowl teams yesterday would clean
    NU's clock? Remember, NU almost beat CU at CU. This shows that they
    can play with very good teams. Your reasoning sounds like a little
    "sour grapes" itself. I repeat myself, however, NU is not a top-10 team
    this year. And Keith, this will be the first time in 20 years that
    NU wont finish top-10.
    
    I believe that FSU is the best team in the country. And yes, the Buffs
    have nothing to be ashamed of and lots to be proud of.
    
    					Nebraska Marty
27.42SASE::SZABObeen TERRIFIED!Wed Jan 03 1990 11:0413
    Nebraska Marty, at least you were a good sport about it all.  You gave
    your honest opinion and didn't go on a personal attack.  And, you had
    the courtesy to forewarn the readers that they may not like what you
    wrote hidden by a form feed.
    
    Those who attacked you are out of line.  They simply should've hit that
    famous N/U key, and they would've went home a little happier.......
    
    And thems the facks.
    
    Hope this helps.
    
    Hawk
27.43BBall gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Jan 03 1990 11:3917
    BBall results:
    
    Kansas State 75
    W. Kentucky 51
    
    Missouri 84
    Austin Peay 48
    
    
    
    Today:
    
    Alaska-Anchorage at Oklahoma
    Chicago St at Oklahoma State
    
    Cowboy
    
27.44FDCV07::TIRRELLLand of the Midnight SunWed Jan 03 1990 11:4418
    Marty
    I have no idea how you can call my statement "sour grapes".  I did,
    however, tell you a month ago that FSU would abuse Nebraska. They did,
    and by the way, so would 8 of the 10 teams mentioned.  
    
    I personally have no feeling one way or the other about Nebraska, but  
    I've thought for a long time that they are over-rated. I have no
    affiliation with any Big 8 school, so I can assure you there are no
    "sour grapes" here. 
    
    Lighten up, Nebraska isn't as bad as you make them out to be, and hey,
    if you're lucky, you too, will  have the chance to be abused in the 
    Orange Bowl by the 'Canes next year! We (BC) have a date with them next 
    November 17th, and I can assure you that the score will be huge!
    
    Later.....
    Jerry
    
27.45NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 03 1990 11:517
    
    Just for the record, Marty, Nebraska has finished out of the Top 10
    (AP) as recently as 1985.  They have finished in the Top 20 every year
    since 1969, however, and no school matches that.
    
    glenn
    
27.46GENRAL::WADEYou can't always get what you wantWed Jan 03 1990 11:5417
    Yeah right, Hawk.  He puts a big disclaimer right before the form
    feed that CU fans better not read past this point.  Gimme a break.
    What are we supposed to do?  Let his corn-fed fingers spew a bunch
    of trash about the Buffs and do nothing?  You're right.  It's just
    his opinion.  Well, here's mine.......he's been reading too many
    Omaha newspapers!  
    
    I don't agree that CU needs to *change* their offense to a pro-
    style.  They shoved it right down ND's throats in the first
    half.  It easily could have been 17-0.  Their offensive philosophy
    didn't hurt them.  Mistakes did!  If they did score 17 in the first
    half, and you add the 6 in the second, the final score would have
    been 23-21.  I know, I know, if if if......
    
    amf,
    
    Claybone
27.47think of the sour grapes come sunday ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSWill Tarheels be invited to the NIT?Wed Jan 03 1990 12:149
    
    Claybone, 1st and goal from the one and no touchdown isn't exactly
    ramming it down ND's throat.......If it easily could have been 17-0
    why wasn't it? Notre Dame like many other top defenses bends but
    doesn't break.....
    
    mike
    
    
27.48POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Jan 03 1990 12:3716
    Coach McCartney said after the game that they would be improving
    the passing game and this isn't an idea that popped into his head
    during the ND game.  At the beginning of the season last year Mac
    planned on getting the rushing perfected and the passing game to
    a point were it was effective.  The following year (1990) he
    planned to work on the passing to get it to where Hagan would be
    a "good" passing QB.  Mac thinks Hagan has the talent to be passing
    threat.
    
    Mac seems to have his team to the point were they're supposed to
    be now.  If CU had been able to work on passing more this last
    season I'm sure that the ND/CU game would have had a different
    outcome.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.49GENRAL::WADEYou can't always get what you wantWed Jan 03 1990 12:4118
    Mike,
    
    	I qualified it with "if if if...".  You call that bending?
    	I call it a piece of swiss cheese.  They got lucky and
    	plugged the right hole ;^).  I KINDA thought Bienemy scored.
    	Mac should not have called a sneak with two huge linemen
    	lined up over the center.  They should have called Bienemy
    	up the middle again on 2cd down and 3rd if they needed to.
    	It appeared Bienemy was heading to the endzone when the
    	leprochaun ran out onto the field and knocked the ball out
    	of his hands.  That's 14.  How many times do you miss a
    	22(?) yard field goal?  There, 17 points.  See how easy
    	it could have been 17-0?  It's easy for this Buffalo headed
    	individual!  
    
    	What sour grapes come Sunday?  Are your jints gonna lose?
    
    Claybone
27.50BSS::RIGGENCo Sports teams= BridesmaidsWed Jan 03 1990 12:458
    The only thing the BIG 8 teams need to change is the defensive strategy
    into a Pro-style 4-3 that the Bears, Eagles teams run. This Defense has
    proven itself as a Pro-style pass killer.
    
    The Big 8 has proven that a ball control run orientated offense kills
    the clock which is how to win against the Miami's and BYU's. 
    
    Jeff
27.51CGHUB::BREENWed Jan 03 1990 13:505
    re: .50 
    
    when was the last time the big 8 beat miami ??????
    
    big 8 has a horrible record against miami and fsu in the '80's.
27.52BSS::RIGGENCo Sports teams= BridesmaidsWed Jan 03 1990 14:0110
    When was the last time the Big 8 beat Miami ??????
    
    
    I don't care....
    
    
    All I said is the way to beat a Pro-style offense ala Miami, BYU is to
    instill a 4-3 defense. 
    
    Jeff
27.531962MILPND::VLASAKRoad WarriorWed Jan 03 1990 14:115
    
    Nebraska beat Miami in the Gotham Bowl!
    
    Bob V.
    
27.54The Times They Are A Changin...CSC32::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearWed Jan 03 1990 15:3092
    re: last few
    
    No Big-8 team has beaten Miami in the '80s.
    
    Nebraska came close in '83 when the Huskers were the better team (by
    national consensus) but still got beat. Of course on Miami's home
    field in a bowl. Geez I am a whiner arent I !!!   ;^)
   
    This makes 2 statements - Miami's talent and Pro style vs Big-8 grind
    it out style of play.
    
    re: .45
    
    Glen, your right, there is an * behing the statement about Nebraksa
    finishing top-10 for each of the past 19 seasons. It should read
    that NU has finished top 10 in at least one of the 2 polls for each
    of the past 19 seasons. The one season that you mentioned they made
    # 10 in only one of the polls. This is something that Osborne can be
    proud of even though he has blown the national championship most of
    those years. The top-10 thing is what has kept him in favor with the
    Nebraska people in the face of all that choking.
    
    re: .46
    
    Claybone, you have a point there but history has proven one thing. When
    a grind it out team gets behind - it's over! Forget any thoughts of a
    comback. A mistake or 2 early, a good team gets ahead by a couple of
    TD's and it's over for Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Colorado.
    
    Now if a grind it out team grunts and grinds out a lead, then it's
    easier for them to hold it with a couple of 8 min drives. But against
    other powerhouses this does not always work.
    
    As I see it, here is what has happened to NU. In the late 60's and into
    the late 70's NU was the nations leader in weight training. In the 60's
    they hired a strengh coach named Boyd Epply. He was ahead of his time.
    He began the strength program at NU with advanced (for that day)
    methods and this largly explains NU's back to back natl titles in 70
    and 71. Up untill about the mid 70's NU held a large advantage in this
    field. Then other colleges started coming to Nebraska and Boyd Epply
    to study their program. Among the distinguished vistiors was a guy
    named Joe Paterno. The list is long and impressive. Several of Epply's
    assistants over the years have gone onto be strength coaches at other
    major universities and have spread Epply's philosophies to other
    schools.
    
    Man, you should see Nebrska's training room. Huge!!! They've got all
    the latest hi tech stuff and enough work stations for every single NU
    football player to work out SIMULTANIOUSLY !!! And they are going to
    spend 500 thousand more on it this year. Geez!
    
    There is only one problem now. Many other schools have caught up to NU
    in this area and have players just as strong as NU overall. This means
    the Huskers cant play grind it out in your face against the top teams
    any more and expect to win with consistancy over top-10 teams. Just
    look an Nu's bowl record in the 80's. Enough said.
    
    Well, toward the end of the 70's Osborne begans to see Oklahoma teams
    that were just as physically strong as NU but with all this great team
    speed to boot. So he started going for more speed (However not with
    enough emphisis on it in my opinion) in recruiting. In a few years you
    started seeing people like Ivring Fryar, Turner Gill, Roger Craig,
    Stever Taylor etc in a Husker uniform. Better speed. But still not
    good enough. But you will notice all of the names I mentioned are
    offensive players.
    
    As the 80's have progressed, he has recurited quicker defesive players
    such as Broderick Thomas, Bret Clark, Neil Smith etc. His defensive
    line has shrunk in weight somewhat in favor of more speed and his
    linebackers have gotten quicker also. But not enough. Miami has proven
    you can have BOTH strength AND speed. NU needs to follow that lead.
    
    As I said before, Osborne's offensive scheme is a good one to pass
    from. His schemes are very deceptive. It's just that he's been way to
    predictable with it. If he would just pass 24 or so times a game
    instead of 12 and spend more time practicing the passing game, NU 
    could be a powerhouse again, and start winning bowl games. Could
    you imagine it, a great passing game to go with NU's rushing? Geez
    it would be devastating. If this dosent happen then history will
    repeat itself time and time again.
    
    By the way Epply is still the NU strength coach. Pro and college teams
    have tried to lure him away thru the years but he likes it an NU.
    
    I'll have to get some Omaha papers from my brother to see what the
    fan reaction is after the Fiesta Bowl. I hope it's one of outrage and
    discontent. Maybee this will help nudge Osbore to some action.
    
    Nebraska still has a top program, it's just been outdated. You gotta
    change with the times.
    
    					Nebraska Marty
27.55FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Jan 03 1990 16:0016
    In the past, Nebraska seems to have been successful by recruiting
    "skilled " position players (RB, WR, DB, QB) and growing its linemen
    through a combination of its walkon program, its weight program
    and the fact that every kid in every small town in Nebraska probably
    wants to play for the Big Red.  In other words, they got the size
    from home and the speed from other parts of the country, and took
    the raw material for the line and developed it in-house.
    
    Only problem with that now is that in Florida, for example, they
    develop linemen who are just as big as those in Nebraska, but faster
    and quicker.
    
    The times they are a-changin', and Nebraska is going to have to
    change with them or fall behind.
    
    John
27.56Osborne and McArtneyCSC32::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearWed Jan 03 1990 16:0864
    Big-8 fans can be proud of something. Osborne and McArtney! They are
    men of high character and morals. I know more about Osborne than I
    do about McArtney since I lived in Nebraska my whole life untill
    recently. So I will concentrate more on Osborne since I have more
    knowledge of him.
    
    But first McArtney. He and Osborne are both professing and practicing
    Chistians. It's not just something in theory for them, it's a way of
    life.
    
    McArtneys handling of his daughters illigitamate pregnacy via Sal is
    quite impressive. First, he supported and loved his daughter in the
    face of this. Secondly, instead of coming down on Sal, he worked with
    him. Knowing Sal had a troubled background he was patient and non-
    condeming. He brought Sal to Christianity before he passed away.
    Now that is love, patience, and character. He is now a very proud and
    loving grandparent. Much better than an abortion or rejection of the
    people involved. He turned a negative into a positve. Excellent role
    model !!!
    
    Now for Osborne. Most people not close to Nebraska football just assume
    that Osborne and NU are a dirty program just because they are a winning
    program (Winningist in the 80's by the way. I just HAD to ge that in).
    This is not so.
    
    I'll give you a little amuseing story as an example. A couple of years
    ago, I think it was in 87 or 88, Nu was playing lowly Iowa State at ISU.
    NU had a very lackluster first half and was only ahead by 7 or
    something like that. Iowa State had more yards then NU and looked good.
    I have heard Osborne say many times that if NU is getting beat he does
    not get upset with the players IF he feels they are giving 100% effort.
    Well in this case he felt the players were not putting out anywhere near
    100%.
    
    Well, the NU players came out the second half and royaly stopmed big
    time. Total domination. Post game interviews with the players indicated
    why. It seems that Dr. Tom got royally mad at halftime because of lack
    of effort by his players. They were dogging it. Osborne could be heard
    from outside the locker room yelling at his players. Can you imagine
    it, Tom Osborne??? Well, the big deal about all of this according to
    the players was that the Osborne used the word "dagummit" when yelling
    at them. "Dagummit" !!! The players said that Osborne NEVER swears
    period and using this word was tantamount to some other big coach
    swearing up a blue streak at halftime. This is one of the few known
    times that Osborne raised his voice.
    
    (I believe that if he yelled more and used "dagummit" more, he would
    win more big games, but thats not the point of this note)
    
    I guarantee you that any garbage illeagle stuff than may be going on
    at Nebraska is done behind Osborne's back and without his knowledge.
    For example steroids or booster stuff. Also, Osborne does not turn
    his head to claim ignorance such as Switzer appeared to do. I dont know
    about McArtney but I would guess he is the same way based on his
    character as a man also.
    
    A good source for more info about Osborne is his book "More Than
    Winning"
    
    Us Big-8 fans have much to be proud of in these 2. I know that us
    Nebraska people are proud as can be of Osborne, even with his flaws.
    Dagummit !!!
    
    					Nebraska Marty
27.57GENRAL::WADEYou can't always get what you wantWed Jan 03 1990 16:3820
    Marty,
    
    	You're right about history and grind it out teams.  The ONE time
    	I saw a grind it out team come back from a BIG deficit was
    	Oklahoma at Nebraska.  That's not a dig.  I still maintain that
    	CU would have won with their grind it out game plan but their
    	own mistakes killed them.
    
    	I can appreciate your comments about coaches and chewing out
    	their players.  We had a coach in high school who needed his
    	mouth washed out with Janitor-in-a-Drum!  I woulda loved to 
    	have kicked him in the filberts!  Did anybody catch the
    	Tennessee-Arkansas game.  A Vol player was coming off the
    	field and the coach was giving him a real earfull.  The TV
    	guys had a microphone on the sideline which picked up
    	everything.  Did you see Mac put his arm around Culbertson,
    	the kicker, after his screwups?  It didn't appear he was
    	chewing him out.  Of course, there was no microphone nearby...;^)
    
    Claybone
27.58No Room for Error...CSC32::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearWed Jan 03 1990 17:2242
    re: -1
    
    Marty,
>    
>    	You're right about history and grind it out teams.  The ONE time
>    	I saw a grind it out team come back from a BIG deficit was
>    	Oklahoma at Nebraska.  That's not a dig.  I still maintain that
>    	CU would have won with their grind it out game plan but their
>    	own mistakes killed them.
    
    Claybone, this is exactly my point. A grind it out team has to play
    flawless ball to win against a top team. I mean flawless. An early
    mistake or 2 any your dead. And it's difficult (not impssible) to
    play flawlessly after a 6 week layoff before a bowl game.
    
    I dident take the OU NU reference as a jab. It's just fact. Man, I
    was so Pi$$ed after that game I had to go outside and trow rocks at
    a tree else I would have broken something in the house.  ;^)
    
    By the way, I've noticed how people are taking great joy in bashing
    Nebraska in notes 59 and 96. Im not just speaking of CU fans who may
    be reacting to my opinions. But fans in general.
    
    Well I'm not upset about this at all. It simply tells me that the NU
    program is recognized and respected around the country as a top notch
    program.
    
    Sports fans in general have one thing in common. They like to see a
    winner beaten and an underdog win.
    
    When the Celts win championships and win 60+ games a year people like
    to see them get beaten. Same for the Lakers. Same for the 49'ers, the
    Oakland A's and on and on.
    
    You know, it's no shame for the Huskers to be down this year. How many
    teams have kept up a top 10 program for so long. NONE!! Other schools
    would love to have NU's record and success. What goes up must come
    down. It's just the way things work. Sooner (No pun intended on OU)or
    later your going to have a down period. It's just life in the jungle.
    I know they will be back anyway. GO BIG RED!!!
    
    					Nebraska Marty
27.59Of course he scored, but you don't *just* beat Notre DameHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERI flushed MrT!Wed Jan 03 1990 18:5813
>I KINDA thought Bienemy scored.

Clay, that's an accepted and expected part of playing Notre Dame.  If CU
continues to build its program and you keep playing ND, you'll get used to
it.

I've been watching USC and ND play for over 15 years and I've seen
so many of those, it's not funny.

You should here the ND ex-players joke about the refs.  It's an on-going
rite of passage.

Dan
27.60Include USC in that party, tooNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 03 1990 19:3626
    
    Unfortunately, Dan, it's been my observation that USC ranks a close
    runner-up to Notre Dame as the media darling of college football.  At 
    least it was that way in the 70's, but USC hasn't been good enough in 
    the 80's for me to continue to make that claim.  Something about the
    big city, the massive Coliseum, the uniforms, the USC band, the mascot 
    Trojan horse, the cheerleaders, the David-versus-Goliath rivalry with 
    the Big 10 in the Rose Bowl all combine to make USC an irresistible 
    team.  I must admit that even I'm sucked in by it.  I've rooted for USC 
    in the Rose Bowl ever since Pat Haden connected on that 2-point 
    conversion in the '75 Rose Bowl to slay the evil Woody Hayes and the 
    hated Buckeyes... ;-)
    
    USC has also got a few officiating beauties to their credit, not the
    first of which was the holding call on Michigan's fake punt in this 
    year's Rose.  *The* absolute worst call I have ever seen in football 
    was Charles White's phantom touchdown in the 1979 Rose, when White
    dropped the ball on the three-yard line as he started his take-off. 
    That call gave USC the winning touchdown in a 17-10 victory over
    Michigan that earned them a share of the national title for 1978.  (I
    guess Bo's got a short memory.)  The Colorado goal line call doesn't 
    even compare to that one.
    
    glenn
    
                                                  
27.61USC hype <<< ND hype, 'specially in the '80sHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERI flushed MrT!Wed Jan 03 1990 19:5246
> I've rooted for USC 
>    in the Rose Bowl ever since Pat Haden connected on that 2-point 
>    conversion in the '75 Rose Bowl to slay the evil Woody Hayes and the 
>    hated Buckeyes... ;-)

That game was one of the great ones, wasn't it?  Pat Haden to the coach's
son, JJ McKay.  They scored to be down by one after a great drive at the
end of the game and went for 2 to win the game.  That's the way football
should be played, not like Ara or Pat Dye.

I'll agree that 'SC gets hyped, especially in the old days of Student
Body Right, but they haven't really pressed an advantage because of
it, nor have they (to my memory) so tastelessly abused their fame
as Notre Dame has gotten away with for years.  So compare, but
don't forget to contrast.

    >USC has also got a few officiating beauties to their credit, not the
    >first of which was the holding call on Michigan's fake punt in this 
    >year's Rose. 

On camera, they have the Michigan player with his arm wrapped around
the contain man on 'SC.  That's a flagrant penalty, one I'm sure is about the
easiest to call for a ref, since it happens at the end of the line like that.  It
also led directly to the success of the fake punt, because with no contain
man, all of a sudden its all green for the punter.   If Bo doesn't raise a fuss,
its an accepted but damning call.

But what happens next?  They punt, and Marinovich marches 'SC down field
for the winning score.  Bo sat there and wailed and forgot about playing the
game.  USC went through them so easily, that they unexpectedly left too much
time on the clock, and Michigan still had another chance.  And didn't gain a 
yard.  It was scary because they got some unnecessary makeup call (piling
on I think) to put them at the 40, but they've got a QB who makes Tony Rice
look like a passer in Taylor.

   >*The* absolute worst call I have ever seen in football 
   > was Charles White's phantom touchdown in the 1979 Rose, when White
   > dropped the ball on the three-yard line as he started his take-off. 
   > That call gave USC the winning touchdown in a 17-10 victory over
   
That one I'll give you.  As I recall, they made a great goal line stand for 2 or 
3 plays before the call.  But you certainly can't point to a pattern of such
calls, or benefits of overhype that ND enjoys.

Dan

27.62BBall gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Jan 04 1990 11:5319
    BBall results:
    
    Oklahoma 101
    Alaska-Anchorage 81
    
    Oklahoma State 67
    Chicago State 59
    
    Iowa State 75
    Ill-Chicago 76
    
    
    Today:
    
    Kansas at Wichita State (+14)
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.63Get down Schneid, your soapbox is wearin' outAXIS::ROBICHAUDNo TV? I surrender!!Thu Jan 04 1990 12:571
    
27.64It never ends...just gets more sickening!JOULE::DIGGINSYa and they're willing to pay 1.5 mil!Thu Jan 04 1990 15:123
    
    Sour grapes are back!!!
    
27.65BBall gamePOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Jan 05 1990 11:189
    BBall results:
    
    Kansas 93
    Wichita State 66
    
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.66Bball games---BIG-8 openersPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Jan 08 1990 13:0439
    Some of the BIG-8 started their conference games Saturday.
    
    Missouri 78
    Oklahoma State 68
    
    Missouri win in Columbia with 2 players fighting the flu and
    another with a cracked rib.
    
    
    Kansas State 72
    Iowa State 68
    
    In Manhattan, KS.  KSU's Steve Henson scored 21 pts and sank
    2 free throws with 10 seconds left to beat ISU.  Henson had
    made his 100th consecutive start.
    
    
    Oklahoma 66
    Colorado 61
    
    In Boulder.  CU hasn't won a BIG-8 opener in 10 years but
    put a scare into 10-0 OU.
    
    
    Other BIG-8 games:
    
    Nebraska 99
    Sam Houston 91
    
    
    Cowboy
     
    
    Kansas 94
    Wihthrop 51
    
    Also,  with #2 KU's win over Winthrop and Syracuse's loss to
    Villanova KU will take over the #1 spot.  KU was 15-0 last
    during 1935 when Phog Allen coach them to a 21-0 start.
27.67Bball gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Jan 09 1990 11:2226
    Bball results:
    
    #1 Kansas 98
    Nebraska 93
    
    In KU's first game as #1 they had to come from a 13 point deficit in
    the 2nd half to win.  Kansas hasn't been ranked #1 in 33 years.
    
    
    
    Today:
    
    Ark.-Little Rock at Oklahoma
    S. Utah at Kansas State
    
    -------------------------------
    
    The BIG-8 is taking over the AP TOP 5.
    
    	#1 Kansas
    	#4 Oklahoma
    	#5 Missouri
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.68HelpCSC32::LATOURTue Jan 09 1990 23:1511
    
    Can anybody give me the schedule for CU or Missouri Basketball.
    Looking for the date of the Missouri at CU game.
    
    
      Thanks,   Drewski
    
    
    
    
    
27.69Bball gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Jan 10 1990 10:1324
    re: -1
    
    Yeah, can someone post the BIG-8 Bball schedules?
    
    
    Bball results:
    
    Oklahoma 134
    Ark.-Little Rock 81
    
    Kansas State 102
    S. Utah 56
    
    
    Today's games:
    
    Iowa State at Houston (+9)
    Kansas at Miami, Fla. (+21)
    New Orleans at Oklahoma State
    Southern U. at Missouri
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.70WILKIE::GORDONThu Jan 11 1990 15:143
                  -< Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big-Eight... >-

    and MIZZOU just keeps on winning...amd winning...and winning....
27.71Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big-EightWILKIE::GORDONThu Jan 11 1990 15:155
    the big one JAN. 27th....Kansas at Missouri.....
    
    I'll take Mizzou by 5....
    
    
27.72Bball gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Jan 12 1990 12:0317
    Results:
    
    Iowa State 82
    Houston 83
    
    Oklahoma State 73
    New Orleans 61
    
    Missouri 106
    Southern U. 87
    
    Kansas 100
    Miami, Fl 73
    
    Cowboy
    
    
27.73missouri-kansas game..jan 20MAMIE::GORDONMon Jan 15 1990 14:556
    my daughter informs me the mizzou - kansas game is JAN. 20th...
    
    not Jan 27 as I stated in .71...
    
    
    
27.74Bball gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Jan 16 1990 11:3529
    Bball results:
    
    Kansas 91
    Oklahoma State 77
    
    Oklahoma 103
    Texas 84
    
    Missouri 111
    Nebraska 95
    
    
    In this week's AP Poll....BIG-8 teams in 3 of the top 4:
    
    #1 KANSAS
    #2 Georgetown
    #3 OKLAHOMA
    #4 MISSOURI
    
    
    Today's games:
    
    Chicago State at Nebraska
    Creighton at Iowa State (-2^)
    Missouri at Oklahoma State (+1^)
    Oklahoma at Kansas State (+10)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.75Bball gamesPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Jan 17 1990 11:2525
    Bball results:
    
    Kansas State 66
    #3 Oklahoma 51
    
    At Manhattan, KS, this was OU's first loss and was
    kept 71 points below their average. 
    
    
    #4 Missouri 72
    Oklahoma State 71
    
    Close one is Stillwater.  Cowboys should have a team that will
    compete by the end of the season.
    
    
    Creighton 99
    Iowa State 94
    
    Nebraska 92
    Chicago State 57
    
    Cowboy
    
    
27.76Bball gamePOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Jan 18 1990 11:308
    Bball results:
    
    Colorado 92
    Wisconsin-Milwaukee 74
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.78Who did the data entry?POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Jan 18 1990 16:328
    RE:-1
    I hope that the 64 teams are assembled better than this ranking
    was assembled.  It's obvious that the BIG-8 is the superior
    conference this year.  The Big Ten and others will be knocked
    out of the tournament by 4 BIG-8 teams.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.79GENRAL::GIBSONThu Jan 18 1990 19:094
    
    Hmmm. OU sure showed how powerful they really are the other night, huh?
    As long as they can play the Northeast Tulsa States, they look
    unbeatable.
27.80POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Jan 18 1990 19:145
    Hey, they got beat by another BIG-8 team.  It's got to be the
    toughest conference around!!!
    
    Cowboy
    
27.81;^)AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacThu Jan 18 1990 19:547
27.82GO REDMEN!!!!TOLKIN::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Thu Jan 18 1990 23:446
    Re: last few
    
    
    
    BARF!!!!!
    
27.83Bball resultsPOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Jan 19 1990 12:2016
    Bball results:
    
    Oklahoma State 92
    S. Utah 68
    
    A S. Utah player broke his back during play under the basket but
    seems to have all his feeling--not paralized.
    
    Kansas 132
    Elizabeth City State 65
    
    
    
    Cowboy
    
    
27.84baseball updatePOGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Jan 19 1990 12:387
    Oklahoma Baseball:
    
    OU named Stan Meek as new baseball coach to replace
    resigning Enos Semore.  
    
    Cowboy
    
27.85USRCV1::COLOTTIRRun to the HillsFri Jan 19 1990 12:564
    Anyone chastising Oklahoma for a early season wimpy schedule, check
    out that super-power, Elizabeth City State. Their lucky to have
    scored 65 points. 8^
    
27.86Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big Eight...WILKIE::GORDONFri Jan 19 1990 14:433
    Yes, but Kansas will be lucky to score 65 against Missouri this
    Sat......hope their 132 vs. Elizabeth City State has their heads
    in the clouds cause Missouri Tigers will bring them back to earth..
27.87I wish it was on the tube....POGO::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Jan 19 1990 15:0810
    Kansas and Missouri should be a good match up.  KU doesn't have
    the individual stars but can really play as a team.  Missouri
    just barely got by Oklahoma State (72-71 at Stillwater) and KU
    didn't look that superior beating OSU by about 20 at KU. (OSU
    had turnover trouble and then cold shooting at the end).
    
    I don't know of another team they have both played.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.88Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big EightWILKIE::GORDONMon Jan 22 1990 11:248
    Missouri 95  Kansas 87
    
    Missouri the only one of top 8 teams in country that didn't lose
    last week...LSU also got beat...Georgetown got beat...
    
    
    Missouri next tues against Rutgers on espn...hope they don't have
    a letdown...
27.89Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big EightWOODRO::GORDONWed Jan 24 1990 11:286
    Missouri 89
    Rutgers  84
    
    next game Missouri at Colorado Jan. 27th
    
    
27.90Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Jan 24 1990 11:5113
    Bball games today:
    
    Oklahoma State at Colorado (+2)    7:35 on 1090 AM Denver radio
    Akron at Kansas State 
    Iowa State at Oklahoma (-18)
    
    
    
    Missouri pulled out a close one last night on ESPN.  I hope they
    don't get careless and loose their #1 rating.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.91Missouri Tigers in the Final Four???WOODRO::GORDONWed Jan 24 1990 13:327
    re: .90
    
    I agree because as others have proved the only place to go when
    your #1 is down...so it's just a matter of time...
    
    As long as they show up at NCAA playoff time ratings mean nothing
    other than everyone guns for you....
27.92COOKIE::MJOHNSTONO Ye of little face!Wed Jan 24 1990 13:345
If the Tigers hadn't been at home they wouldn't be #1 right now. Rutgers came
to play (and not like an 8-10 team). They were up by ten before Mo. knew the
game had started.

Mike JN
27.93MbM - NCAA Tourney Possibilities for the Big 8AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacWed Jan 24 1990 16:1165
================================================================================
Note 127.0                       Three #1 seeds?                       2 replies
MAIL::MCNIEL                                         19 lines  24-JAN-1990 12:06
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -<Let's talk NCAA Tourney possibilities for the Big Eight>- 
     
    	I count three:
    
    	Kansas  
        Missouri
    	Oklahoma
    
    QUESTION 1: Does a young Okie State or Colorado, or even a scrappy
    	        K-State stand a chance at getting in?
              
    QUESTION 2: What would their record(s) have to be?
    
    The BIG EIGHT is going to be seasoned and tough to beat come tourney
    time.
    
    Go Hawks!
    
    MGM      
================================================================================
Note 127.1                       Three #1 seeds?                          1 of 2
CNTROL::CHILDS "All's I need is a rope and a tree G" 12 lines  24-JAN-1990 12:59
             -< plus as they play one another losses will pile up >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    MGM, doubt you'll ever see three #1 seeds from any conference. The
    balance around the country is just too good right now.
    
    I'd say that the regular season Big 10 Champ, and the winners of
    the big east tournment, acc tournment and big eight tournment will
    get the number 1 seeds. Although last year Indiana did get screwed
    out their #1 seed but that had more to with not wanting to let the
    Hooisers play their first round games at their second home court...
    
    
    mike
================================================================================
Note 127.2                       Three #1 seeds?                          2 of 2
FTMUDG::REED "Oklahoma State athletic supporter"     19 lines  24-JAN-1990 13:05
                            -< I counted four.... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >	I count three:
    >
    >	Kansas  
    >   Missouri
    >	Oklahoma
    
    	Oklahoma State  (I count four)
    
    OSU lost to Missouri by 1 point and played Kansas (in Kansas) a good
    game. Turnovers lost the game for them. 
    
    The Big-8 is tough this year and I wouldn't be surprised to see all
    four of these teams loose to the other BIG-8 teams once or twice.
    (Other than to Nebraska, that is)
    
    Cowboy
    
    
    
    
27.94To seed or not to seed? That is...MAIL::MCNIELWed Jan 24 1990 17:5017
    Mike,
    
    Oh, I agree...three (3) #1 seeds is just wishful thinking.  More
    like a #1, a #2, and/or #3 or #4 for the tri-state powers in seperate
    regionals would be more realistic.
    
    Hey Cowboy!  I am a Jayhawker and a proud resident of the State
    of Kansas (49th in tourism)...And, I am pulling for you goat-ropers
    to get in!  I think Oklahoma State has great atheletes and can beat
    anybody in the country on a given day.  My concern is with the coach.
    Can you tell us a little about him?   Is he like a Roy Williams
    (soon to be coach of the year), or is he more like Tubbs and Normys
    hands off/let em play style?
                                                                 
    MGM
    
    
27.95GENRAL::GIBSONWed Jan 24 1990 18:574
    
    Colorado doesn't stand a chance of getting in the NCAA tourny. They
    aren't good. Colorado St. will get in though. Colorado will be lucky 
    to get a NIT bid.
27.96Cowboys basketball coachFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Jan 24 1990 19:1131
    re: Oklahoma State BBall coach
    
    Leonard Hamilton is in his 4th or 5th year as head coach.  He was
    hired from Kentucky where he was an assistant and known as an
    excellent recruiter.  Hamilton seems to be a good coach but relies
    on his recruiting talents rather than "developing" players.  He
    apparently goes after the stronger type player.  His recruiting
    talent has paid off, too--I read that he has taken the top state
    prospect from OU every year except one.
    
    I wouldn't be surprised to see him have OSU run with OU rather than
    try to slow it down.  He's recruited the right players to play a fast,
    physical game--as long as they don't turn the ball over they can play
    with anyone. (Which is the one thing that has hurt OSU this year.)
    
    Hamilton has gradually improved the team each year which goes back
    to his ability to recruit.
    
    	Games OSU could win:
    		Kansas at OSU
    		OU at OSU
    		OSU at OU (a long shot, I admit)
    		OSU at Missouri (another long shot but not surprising after
    			the UM/OSU at OSU)
    
    This BIG-8 season is looking like it may be better than the KU/OU
    championship year.
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.97Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Jan 25 1990 12:1537
    Bball results:
    
    Oklahoma State 71
    Colorado 68
    
    OSU overcame a 16-pt deficit in the 2nd half with a 11-2 run to
    end a 3-year losing streak at Boulder.  CU's loss began after
    Stevie Wise's 3-pointer upped CU's lead to 64-55 with 3:53 left.
    Buffs coach Tom Miller thought that they got relaxed and started
    going individual.  From that point CU only made 1 basket while
    OSU scored 16 points.  OSU's Byron Houston's turnaround jumper
    with 2:15 left pulled them to within 2 at 66-64 and then his
    dunk with 1:14 tied it at 66.  Houston played the entire 2nd
    half without picking up his 4th foul--and managed to draw
    several fouls.  He scored 10 of his 16 points and got 6 of his
    12 rebounds in the 2nd, also.  OSU's game winner came at the
    buzzer when John Potter made a 3-pointer. (Potter missed the
    potential game winner against Missouri last week).  
    
    CU committed 10 of their 14 turnovers in the 2nd half and with
    Rodell Guest fouling out at 6:45 left and Asad Ali with 3:34
    left the Buffs apparently fell apart. CU's conference leader
    Shaun Vandiver missed 2 shots at the end and was held 10 pts
    below his conference leading average.
    
    
    Oklahoma 107
    Iowa State 96
    
    OU took control of this see-saw match in Norman with a 10-3 
    run.  Billy Tubbs said, "We're struggling, but you've got
    something going right when you shoot 44% and the other team
    shoots 51% and we win."
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.98a big one coming up....FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Jan 25 1990 12:4526
    
    The Bedlam Series turns to basketball this Saturday in Norman.
    
    OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSSS   UUU  UUU            OOOOOOOO   UUU  UUU
    OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSSS   UUU  UUU            OOOOOOOO   UUU  UUU
    OOO  OOO   SSS        UUU  UUU            OOO  OOO   UUU  UUU
    OOO  OOO   SSS        UUU  UUU            OOO  OOO   UUU  UUU
    OOO  OOO    SSSSSS    UUU  UUU     AT     OOO  OOO   UUU  UUU
    OOO  OOO    SSSSSS    UUU  UUU            OOO  OOO   UUU  UUU
    OOO  OOO        SSS   UUU  UUU            OOO  OOO   UUU  UUU
    OOO  OOO        SSS   UUU  UUU            OOO  OOO   UUU  UUU
    OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSSS   UUUUUUUU            OOOOOOOO   UUUUUUUU
    OOOOOOOO   SSSSSSSS   UUUUUUUU            OOOOOOOO   UUUUUUUU
    
        (I'm a little excited)
    
    This game is nearly always an exciting battle--no matter how the
    talent is--either at Norman or Stillwater.  Hey, these players
    hate to lose to the other hated school.  
    
    (11:05 P.M. tape replay on Denver channel 7 Saturday.)
    
    I'll take OSU to pull the upset (of course)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.99See you in DenverMAIL::MCNIELThu Jan 25 1990 15:3120
    Cowboy,
    
    I agree with you on the Big Eight being stronger this year vs. the
    OU/KU final four match-up two years ago.  Sure we had KU, KSU, 
    IOWA ST, MU, and OU (am I missing anybody?) in  And,  if I recall,
    we placed 4 in the final sixteen, 3 in the final eight, and of course 
    2 in the final four.  I think this year, the Tri-state will send
    the big-three - KU, mu, ou (intentional lower-case) and hopefully
    OSU (intentional upper-case).
    
    To me the difference is simply:  Quality vs. Quantity.  The odds
    of a National Championship for the Big Eight are better because
    the teams are better.  FYI - Yes, I believe, Roy and the Boy's would beat
    Manning & the Juniors like a step child 8 out of 10 times they played.
                                 
                                                                          
    
    GO HAWKS!
    
    MGM 
27.100some good Bball on TV Saturday....FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Jan 26 1990 16:3712
    There are 2 BIG-8 games on the tube tomorrow:
    
    Missouri at Colorado         (2pm Sat. on Denver channel 7)
    Oklahoma State at Oklahoma   (11:05pm Sat. on Denver channel 7, taped)
    
    CU has to be still boiling after letting OSU come back and win by
    a bucket and should be taking it out on UM.  OSU should be feeling
    good after putting it together against CU and thinking that they
    can whip OU who was close to losing their 3rd game in a row.
    
    Cowboy
          
27.101Missouri Tigers #1 in Big Eight...WOODRO::GORDONMon Jan 29 1990 11:354
    Missouri 108
    Colorado  89
    
    next missouri game at home feb. 4th, not sure on opponent...
27.102BIG-8 gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Jan 29 1990 12:1121
    Bball results:
    
    Oklahoma 109
    Oklahoma State 92
    
    Close game until 2nd half where OU went to half-court man-to-man
    and caused OSU problems.
    
    
    
    Missouri 104
    Colorado 89
    
    Missouri had no problem keeping their lead over the Buffs.
    
    
    Iowa State 91
    Nebraska 83
    
    Cowboy
    
27.103Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big EightWILKIE::GORDONThu Feb 01 1990 10:177
    Missouri 95
    Iowa     93
    
    another close call by the Tigers, but all these close games will
    make them tougher for the final four...!!!!
    
    next game at home feb. 4th against Colorado...stay tuned
27.104Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 01 1990 10:2121
    All BIG-8 teams played conference games last night:
    
    #1 Missouri 95
       Iowa State 93  Close call in Ames as the Tigers lead much
    		      of the game.
    
    #2 Kansas 90
       Colorado 69    No problem for KU as CU's BIG-8 road loss
    		      streak climbs to 47 games.
    
    #9 Oklahoma 105
       Nebraska 64    NU never had a chance in Norman.
    
       Oklahoma St 89
       Kansas St 67   OSU's Royce Jeffries scored 10 of his 21 pts
                      during a 5 minute period in 2nd half.
    
    Cowboy
    
    
    
27.105Bball standingsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 01 1990 10:2817
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    		CONFERENCE		ALL GAMES 
    		W-L	PCT.		W-L	PCT.
    Missouri	6-0	1.000		20-1	.952
    Kansas	4-1	 .800		21-1	.955
    Oklahoma	4-1	 .800		15-2	.882
    Okla. St	3-4	 .429		12-7	.632
    Kansas St	2-3	 .400		12-9	.571
    Iowa St	2-3	 .400		7-10	.412
    Colorado	1-5	 .167		9-10	.474
    Nebraska	0-5	 .000		7-11	.389
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.106Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 02 1990 10:149
    Saturdays games:
    
    Iowa State at Oklahoma State
    Kansas State at Nebraska
    Oklahoma at Kansas
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.107games with spreadsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterSat Feb 03 1990 11:4912
    Saturdays games:
    
    Iowa State at Oklahoma State (-8)
    Kansas State at Nebraska (pk)
    Oklahoma at Kansas (-5)
    
    
    The OU/KU game will be shown (tape replay) on Denver channel 7 at
    11:05pm tonight (Sat).  This has to be a good one!
    
    Cowboy
    
27.108Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big EightWOODRO::GORDONMon Feb 05 1990 08:566
    Missouri 93
    Colorado 69
    
    Missouri next game on ESPN thur. I think...
    
    stay tuned
27.109Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Feb 05 1990 10:5238
    Bball results:
    
    Saturday:
    
    #2 Kansas 85
    #9 Oklaoma 74
    
    OU's #2 scorer and #1 rebounder William Davis was left home for
    "disciplinary reasons" and probably hurt the Sooners chances to
    beat KU in Lawarence.  There were 55 fouls in this game.
    
    
    Oklahoma State 86
    Iowa State 78
    
    The Cowboys continue to win the games that they should. If they
    could upset Missouri, Oklahoma or Kansas their chances of making
    the NCAA-64 should greatly improve.  Bryon Houston continues to
    be a force scoring 24 points and Royce Jeffries scored 22.
    
    
    Nebraska 74
    Kansas State 71
    
    The Cornhuskers finally won their first conference game plus
    hurt KS's chances of making the NCAA tourny.
    
    
    Sunday:
    
    Missouri 93
    Colorado 69
    
    #1 Missouri has no problem with the Buffs.
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.110standingsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Feb 05 1990 10:5916
    		BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    	    CONFERENCE	     ALL GAMES 
    		W-L		 W-L
    	
    Missouri	7-0		21-1
    Kansas	5-1		22-1	
    Oklahoma	4-2		15-3	
    Okla. St	4-4		13-7
    Kansas St	2-4		12-10	
    Iowa St	2-4		 7-11
    Colorado	1-6		 9-11
    Nebraska	1-5		 8-11
    
                
27.111wrestlingFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Feb 05 1990 12:4724
    Wrestling:
    
    Oklahoma State's Randy Couture upset Arizona State's Rex
    Holman at 190 pounds and the #1 ranked Cowboys (15-0)
    survived a controversial call at the buzzer for a 19-13
    victory against #2 Arizona State (15-2-1) with both losses
    to OSU).
    
    OSU NCAA wrestling champs 2 years in a row?  
    
    
    class:
    118	Zeke Zones (ASU) d. Tony Purier 8-7
    126 Kendall Cross (OSU) d. Shawn Charles 4-2
    134 Chris Owens (OSU) d. Andy McNaughton 6-4
    142 Thom Ortiz (ASU) d. Chuck Barbee 3-1
    150 Townsend Sanders (ASU) d. Todd Chesbro 3-1
    167	Dan St. John (ASU) major d. Robby Hadden 13-5
    177 Chris Barnes (OSU) major d. G.T. Taylor 11-2
    190 Randy Couture (OSU) d. Rex Holman 8-7
    Hwt Kirk Mammen (OSU) d. Mike Anderson 5-4
    
    Cowboy
    
27.112PHILEM::SAPPSU-Ready to kill UCONN!!Mon Feb 05 1990 15:391
    When does Missouri play Oklahoma??
27.113Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Feb 05 1990 18:1214
    re:-1
    The Missouri/Oklahoma game *may* be this Saturday.  It might be
    the 11:05 taped replay on Denver channel 7 this Sat. night.  I'll
    try to check the TV guide.
    
    Others this week:
    
    Oklahoma at Iowa State--Wednesday
    Kansas at Oklahoma State--Wednesday
    Missouri at Kansas State--Thursday
    
    
    Cowboy
     
27.114Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big Eight...MAMIE::GORDONTue Feb 06 1990 10:039
    RE: -.1,-.1
    
    Asked my daughter yesterday(freshman at Missouri) she said that
    Oklahoma was at Missouri Feb 18th and it is scheduled for NBC...
    
    Missouri has Kansas State thurs on ESPN...and the BIG ONE at
    Kansas next Tues. on ESPN.....not sure about Sat.....
    
    
27.115I forgot to look at the TV guide....FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 06 1990 15:168
    RE:-1
    
    You're probably right.  I pretty sure that there's a BIG-8
    game on Denver 7 saturday night at 11:05 and thought it was
    Missouri but I'll try to remember to check tonight.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.116BIG-8 Standings 2-5-90FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 06 1990 16:1315
    
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    		CONFERENCE		ALL GAMES 
    		W-L	 PCT.		 W-L	PCT.
    Missouri	7-0	1.000		21-1	.955
    Kansas	5-1	 .833		22-1	.957
    Oklahoma	4-2	 .667		15-3	.833
    Okla. St	4-4	 .500		13-7	.650
    Kansas St	2-4	 .333		12-10	.545
    Iowa St	2-4	 .333		 7-11	.389
    Nebraska	1-5	 .167		 8-11	.421
    Colorado	1-6	 .143		 9-11	.450
                         
27.117For Husker Fans OnlyBSS::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearTue Feb 06 1990 21:4514
    I know it's not football season but I just got a Nebraska recruiting
    update from a DEC employee in Omaha. This Calvin Jones is a very
    highlt touted back...
    
>	Well Marty Calvin Jones of Omaha Central verbally committed to NU
>last week we also got a verbal commitment from one of the top 5 saftys in
>the nation so if they sign it looks like NU could have a pretty good class
>of Freshmen. The saftey was verbally committed to Miami but he backed out
>and committed to the huskers. Supposedly he has already met Prop. 42
>requirements. I dont know if Calvin Jones has or not. I will keep you
>posted. 
    
    Nebraska Marty       Go Mizzou and Kansas in Hoops !!!
    
27.118NU B8 BB REC TOPS CUMILPND::VLASAKRoad WarriorTue Feb 06 1990 21:5310
    
    Marty,
    
    Nebraska also got some hotshot running back from North Carolina,
    perhaps some of our ACC friends can tell us more.
    
    Oh, by the way, at least NU is better than CU in basketball. :-)
    
    Bob V.
    
27.119Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 08 1990 15:0827
    Bball results:
    
    Nebraska 91
    Colorado 82
    
    Kansas 83
    Oklahoma State 76
    
    The Cowboys did it again--they started off cold allowing KU a 10 point
    lead before making any baskets.  KU was ahead by 24 several times but
    OSU got to within 6 near the end of the game.  Lots of fouls on both
    teams.
    
    Oklahoma 86
    Iowa State 81
    
    ISU gave all the Sooners could handle.
    
    
    
    Today:
    
    Missouri at Kansas State
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.120BIG-8 StandingsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 08 1990 15:2314
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    		CONFERENCE		ALL GAMES 
    		W-L	 PCT.		 W-L	PCT.
    Missouri	7-0	1.000		21-1	.955
    Kansas	6-1	 .857		23-1	.958
    Oklahoma	5-2	 .714		16-3	.842
    Okla. St	4-5	 .444		13-8	.619
    Kansas St	2-4	 .333		12-10	.545
    Nebraska	2-5	 .286		 9-11	.450
    Iowa State	2-5	 .286		 7-12	.368
    Colorado	1-7	 .125		 9-12	.429
                                                    
27.121back to football....FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 08 1990 15:5121
    Football news from Oklahoma and Oklahoma State:
    
    Cale Gundy (younger brother to Mike--OSU's BIG-8 recording setting QB)
    has said to be going to OU.  Cale has broken most of his brother's
    QB records at high school.  It looks like OU is serious about running
    a passing offense since they have signed OSU's Offensive Coordinator,
    Larry Coker, and will have a standout QB--Gundy--to run it.
    
    The reason that OSU was able to land players like Hart Lee Dykes, Mike
    Gundy and Thurman Thomas was because of the more traditional 'I'
    formation that better suited these guys.  (OU didn't really go after
    Barry Sanders since it was thought that he was too small for a RB and
    the Sooners talked of using him as a defensive back.)  With OU
    apparently making these major changes to their offense I expect that
    OSU will have even more difficulty snatching up quality players.
    (Mainly those from Texas that want to go to an Oklahoma school.  Many
    of the in-state HS grads have made up their minds long before they
    graduate).
    
    Cowboy
        
27.122Prepare for Probation, Missouri fans.RHETT::KNORRInnocent Contest JudgeThu Feb 08 1990 16:0235
    Some nasty allegations were reported in today's Atlanta
    Journal-Constitution regarding Missouri.   Two former Mizzou players
    (Daniel Lyton & P.J. Mays) told the paper they have been granted
    limited immunity by the NCAA in return for their testimony about
    alleged rules violations by Tigers coaches that include using an
    illegal talent scount, obtaining free meals, and providing
    transportation to summer jobs.
    
    Missouri's case will be heard after the basketball season is over, so
    they'll be spared any possible sanctions this year.
    
    Several other alleged sanctions were mentioned, including:
    
    o Possible connection between an apartment being rented by Nathan
      Buntin's mother
    
    o Illegal payments by asst. coach Rich Daly to players, including
      airline tickets and money in exchange for some minor yard work
    
    o Allegations have been raised that the high school transcript of
      Doug Smith may have been tampered with
    
    o asst. coach Jon Sundvold purchasing meals for the coach of a recruit
    
    o Ben Kelso, coach of Daniel Lyton, has said Missouri offered "more
      than a scholarship" for his player.
    
    
    Since Missouri hasn't been under sanctions before it's possible the
    NCAA may go easy on them.  But Norm Stewart has few friends and many
    enemies among Big Eight coaches, and many are on record as saying if
    the NCAA doesn't sock the Tigers, they're gonna raise a big ole stink.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
27.123NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 08 1990 16:5015
    
    OU must be paying better than OSU these days, Cowboy.  Er, at least
    maybe they're offering better fringe benefits.  (Didn't Hart Lee
    Dykes take half the schools in the Southwest down with him before they
    found the real reason why he ended up at State?)
    
    No comments on Tom Osborne's admission that on more than one occasion
    running back Doug DuBose underwent treatment for cocaine dependency,
    yet no action was ever taken against him?  I thought one Nebraska Marty
    assured us that if anything was going on at Nebraska, we could be
    damned sure that Honest Tom knew nothing about it.  I don't know how
    Nebraska keeps managing to stay one step ahead of the law...
    
    glenn
    
27.124this is getting old...FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 08 1990 17:0115
    I hate to see another BIG-8 team go down but this crap has got to
    stop.  I wish that the NCAA would allow the schools to pay a small
    amount to athletes to help cover living expenses.  These athletes
    often come from poor families and can't always help out financially.
    And why not pay the athletes?  They are providing the schools
    advertising and the fans entertainment--in exchange for an education
    (of questionable quality and value).
    
    If rich boosters buy the athletes cars then sue these guys or somehow
    make it hurt so they won't want to do it again.  It the schools screw
    up then give them an automatic death penalty and make it hard for the
    guilty party to work again.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.125FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 08 1990 17:1310
    Yeah, Glenn Dykes *did* make out financially at OSU but I have to
    think that he wanted to play at a passing school rather than a
    wishbone.  I thought that Keith Jackson made a big mistake for
    playing at OU.  As it turned out Jackson was able to catch KEY
    balls to gain national attention.  Had he dropped a couple of
    those it would have been difficult for him to make it up and
    go as early in the draft as he did, IMO.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.126VIEW3D::MACGREGORThu Feb 08 1990 19:0611
    IMO, having colleges pay atheletes money is completely unfair to
    the average student.  I'm here forking over $17,000 a year, while
    some basketball or football player gets full tuition paid and then
    gets PAID to go there.  That's BS.  I play a lot of basketball in
    my spare time and I've also played members of the school team. 
    These "super atheletes" quite often LOSE against me, but because
    I put school and my career ahead of sports, I lose out on tuition.
    
    NO, NO WAY IN H*LL SHOULD COLLEGES PAY THEIR ATHELETES.
    
    The Wizard   8^(
27.127Obviously, I disagree...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 08 1990 19:277
    
    Where are you going to school?  The Celtics are looking for a couple of
    "super athletes" right about now.  You can always go back for your
    degree, right?
    
    glenn

27.128FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Feb 08 1990 19:348
    One thing is that athletes are prohibited by the NCAA from holding
    a job during the school year.  You're not.  I don't know much about
    your background, but very often athletes come from very underprivileged
    families.  Finally, athletes in college football and basketball
    bring in millions of dollars to their schools and don't see very
    much of it.  Something is unfair there.
    
    John
27.129its a job...FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 08 1990 20:1011
    These athletes SHOULD be paid because in reality they are working for
    the schools.  They are entertainers with a chance to make it big in
    the pros.  Most of them chose to make a living in sports rather
    than with a regular job.  The education is just a technicality--they
    have to pass classes.
    
    I think most of us (including me) are envious of them and would feel
    that we deserved living expenses paid, if we were in their positions.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.130LUNER::BROOKSDrM : The Conscience Of SPORTSThu Feb 08 1990 20:1819
    Marc, I've seen both sides of the fence. And I made it through school
    with an engineering scholarship (no way in hell *my* parents could
    afford to send me !), and I was broke more often than not (just
    like now :-).
    
    But I've got to disagree with you. 
    
    S-A's can't get jobs, and according to NCAA rules, they can get
    $50 a month for a stipen, tops. My freshman year, my stipend was
    $166/month. And I never played a minute of sports.
    
    Another thing, these athletes are bringing in MILLIONS to the schools.
    At many of the schools, they are paying for your (generic) lab
    equipment. 
    
    As an example, Akeem Olajuwon generated over $12 million for UH
    in his three years there.
    
    Why shouldn't he get something ?
27.131Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big EightWILKIE::GORDONFri Feb 09 1990 11:419
    Kansas St. 65
    Missouri   58
    
    State did a great job shutting down the inside game and owning
    the boards....stormin normin can't be happy at what he saw last
    night.....they better be ready for TUES. at Kansas cause Kansas
    watch watching last night and will be ready....
    
    Missouri will still be there at final four time though...
27.132My 2 centsSHALOT::MEDVIDYour own personal JesusFri Feb 09 1990 12:0721
>Finally, athletes in college football and basketball
>bring in millions of dollars to their schools and don't see very
>much of it.  Something is unfair there.
    
    So, should ALL athletes be paid or just the football and basketball
    players.  I was on an swimming scholarship to Ohio U and the athletes I
    knew on the non-revenue sports (swimming, golf, track, etc.) were very
    conscientious students.  The basketball and football players were exact
    opposites.  I don't think that it's much different at any other
    Division I school.
    
    We, the non-revenue athletes went to class and got no special
    treatment.  The football and basketball players hardly ever went to
    class yet passed them anyway.  Now we want to pay them?  Yes, there's
    an arguement for payment to student athletes, but we need major reforms
    in athlete academics first.
    
    Mr. moderator, I think we should move this discussion somewhere else. 
    It's going to get lengthy.
    
    	--dan'l
27.133Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 12:1515
    re:-1
    
    The BIG-8 is tough this year!  That must have been an exciting
    game for the Wildcats in Manhattan.  Missouri was held 32 pts
    below its season average.
    
    
    Saturday's games:
    
    Kansas at Iowa State
    Nebraska at Missouri (Will the Cornhuskers catch Missouri down?--naa)
    Oklahoma State at UNLV
    
    
    Cowboy
27.134football newsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 12:199
    Oklahoma State U signed Mike Gundy as Receiver's Coach.
    
    Gundy was OSU's QB for the last 4 seasons and set several
    BIG-8 records.  His younger brother, graduating from HS this
    year is supposed to be going to OU.
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.135pay 'em all, if they're on scholarshipFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 12:2915
    re: .132
    
    >So, should ALL athletes be paid or just the football and basketball
    >players.  I was on an swimming scholarship to Ohio U and the athletes I
    >knew on the non-revenue sports (swimming, golf, track, etc.) were very
    >conscientious students.  The basketball and football players were exact
    >opposites.  I don't think that it's much different at any other
    >Division I school.
    
    Pay ALL athletes who are on scholarships *a small amount* for living
    expenses--$150-$200/month tops.  Maybe reinburse other athletes, not
    on scholarships, for expenses that involve their sports activities.
    
    Cowboy
     
27.136Let's look at the *whole* picture here.RHETT::KNORRInnocent Contest JudgeFri Feb 09 1990 12:4012
    You Big Eight defenders are quick to drag this discussion into a
    "should they be paid or shouldn't they", which implies that maybe
    Mizzou is just a victim of unjust NCAA guidelines.  (I personally feel
    the athletes *SHOULD* be paid, as does Dean, BTW.)
    
    BUT ...  let's not lose sight of the fact that there are other charges
    being brought up against Missouri that have nothing to do with money
    dispursements.  The grade-tampering charge against Doug
    Smith comes to mind.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
27.137VIEW3D::MACGREGORFri Feb 09 1990 12:5724
    First, my appoligies to the readers of this note who aren't going
    to listen to this argument.  If someone sets up another note dedicated
    to this discussion, then I will gladly move on to it.
    
    Second, COL'LEGE n. school of higher learning.  Colleges and
    universities exist because they are to teach the younger generations
    how to deal with the real world.  *Most* atheletes in these higher
    education institutes wouldn't be there, except that they play their
    sport well.
    
    I was unaware of the NCAA ruling that stated that atheletes couldn't
    have a job.  Due to my sudden understanding of this I can understand
    paying them *a small amount* of money that would otherwise be obtained
    by having a job.  However, since colleges and universities exist
    to better mans' knowledge people shouldn't get unfair treatment
    by getting tuition free.  
    
    If you want to set up a seperate "school" for atheletes, then I have 
    no quarrel with paying them, but you go to school to LEARN. 
    
    Like I stated originally, this is just my opinion.  I happen to
    feel very strongly about it, but it is just an opinion.
    
    The Wizard
27.138Reimbursement, not paymentNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 09 1990 12:5725
    
    I agree.  The money paid should not be a negotiated salary, but a 
    reasonable, flat stipend.  If the requirement is to grant this stipend 
    to *all* scholarship athletes, then fairness to all student-athletes 
    is maintained and the proceeds from big-time athletics are at least in 
    some way funneled back to the participants.
    
    Of course the big-time sports programs will still realize a profit from
    these athletes.  *If* the player receives a non-revocable scholarship 
    and reasonable living expenses, I'm not convinced that the system would 
    be exploitative of the athletes, though.  If the colleges agree not to 
    restrict player movement into the true professional ranks (talent
    willing) I would think that the system would be mutually beneficial. 
    Many coaches are already quite honest about this with their top
    athletes.  The appeal of college sports is still less about the 
    attraction of individual stars than the attraction of the alma mater,
    so I disagree that full-scale professionalism of college sports is in
    order.  Placing the athletes on the open market would lessen the appeal 
    of college football and basketball for me (which I prefer over the pro
    games), just as blatant professionalism in the Olympics did.  The NCAA 
    just needs to do away with the current petty, hypocritical definition 
    of an "amateur", though.
    
    glenn

27.139Scholarships productiveNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 09 1990 13:1122
    
    Wizard,
    
    Your points are well taken, but your suggestions are tantamount to
    complete abandonment of college sports as we know them.  Maybe we're
    all hypocrites, but a great number of us enjoy college sports and do
    enjoy seeing them broadcast on the tube.  Your system would eliminate
    an opportunity for thousands of underprivileged kids.  A common
    assumption is that most of these kids wouldn't and shouldn't have been
    in school had they not excelled in a sport in high school.  I disagree.  
    Certainly some shouldn't, but many make great use of the opportunity
    and move on to bigger and better things.
    
    A return to the 1920's, with sports relegated to a local interest only,
    or a down-scaled Division 3 no-TV, no-scholarship type format just 
    wouldn't make many of us happy, I'm afraid.  I don't see where it would
    necessarily be fair to students in general or student-athletes in
    particular, either.
    
    glenn
     
                                                       
27.140VIEW3D::MACGREGORFri Feb 09 1990 13:2820
    I too am an avid fan of college sports, and partake in watching
    them quite often.  However the discussion was whether athletes should
    be paid (above and beyond the free things they already get), not
    how to separate sports from the universities.  My "suggestion" wasn't
    meant to be taken as completely serious and I don't know if a "fair
    and impartial" method will ever be found (I hope it is), but unless
    the scholastic ability of the atheletes meets the university standards,
    then (sorry if this sounds harsh) they should go to a lesser school.
    
    These people provide a needed entertainment, but until someone like
    myself, who will better the community of the future, gets the same
    tuition paid treatment that they do, then things just aren't fair.
    I'm not saying all this because I didn't get my tuition paid either,
    because for my freshmen year I received a small scholarship for
    running cross country.  I am grateful for the small sum of money
    I received, but my statement still stands, until everyone is treated
    equally I will dispise anyones suggestions of *paying* college 
    atheletes.
    
    The Wizard
27.141HEURIS::METZGERI will not Burp in classFri Feb 09 1990 13:3512
Pay all student atheletes a living expense stipend if they qualify for it
financially. Why give a student money if they don't need it ?


Let them leave school at any time to move onto the pro-ranks....

That way if the person is just there as a minor leagues for the pros they
can move on whenever they want to. If they are there to actually make use of the
school and further their education then they stay for the 4 years. 

Metz
27.142everyone benefitsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 13:4219
    >Second, COL'LEGE n. school of higher learning.  Colleges and
    >universities exist because they are to teach the younger generations
    >how to deal with the real world.  *Most* atheletes in these higher
    
    >by having a job.  However, since colleges and universities exist
    >to better mans' knowledge people shouldn't get unfair treatment
    >by getting tuition free.  
    
    Not now (and probably not ever).  Colleges, that support sports
    programs, exist for both education and athletics.  That's reality
    in the real world now.  Not everyone can go to school and graduate
    with a high-powered degree and then work at a desk job.  It's not
    mentally possible.  I see nothing wrong with someone, with athletic
    ability, going to school to "learn" the finer points of his sport
    and going on to the pros--if he's good enough.  This helps everyone.
    The schools, fans, city, state--and the athlete.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.143FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Feb 09 1990 13:4249
    I agree that all the athletes on scholarship should be treated equally.
    If the football players and basketball players are going to be allowed
    stipends, then all the scholarship athletes should.
    
    I also agree that if an athlete doesn't meet a school's academic
    standards, then s/he shouldn't go there.  Unfortunately, the colleges
    are now being asked to do the jobs of our elementary and secondary
    schools.  Too often, students go to college without a sound backing
    in the fundamentals and they shouldn't be allowed to attend college
    without them.  And it just so happens that many of the top athletes
    come from inadequate school systems, especially in basketball, where
    so many of them come from our worst public school systems, from
    the inner cities.
    
    There has also been a radical change in the nature of colleges since
    the NCAA was first formed.  Back in the days of yore, if you weren't
    qualified to go to college out of high school, you didn't go and
    you probably never went.  If you couldn't afford it, you didn't
    go and probably never went.  Since WW2 (the Big One, Sarge), college
    has become more and more open to people - financial aid has improved,
    continuing education and non-traditional programs have flourished,
    and more and more people have taken advantage of the programs. 
    College has become less and less of an elite thing.  While this
    has been good in many ways, colleges and universities have devalued
    themselves with easier programs and a degree has become less valuable.
    There are now many more easier programs - continuing ed is probably
    easier than full time attendance.  It has to be, because they are
    meeting the needs of the non-traditional student juggling family,
    job and so forth.  I went to a night MBA program and it was a lot
    more flexible and probably easier than an equivalent daytime program
    would have been.
    
    These non-traditional programs give colleges and universities great
    opportunities to stash athletes in less demanding programs to keep
    them eligible.  An athlete should be allowed in these programs because
    s/he should not be kept from them just because s/he is an athlete.
    I feel more strongly though that an athlete should get no more breaks
    academically than a normal student.  Athletic department sponsored
    tutoring is OK, special consideration for travel is OK but nothing
    beyond that.
    
    The solution isn't at the college level.  The solution is to improve
    the elementary and secondary educational programs first to make
    sure the kids who go to college have the sound background they need.
    Then, colleges have to tighten up their standards and not accept
    kids until they can handle the work.  Unfortunately if they tighten
    up now, half the college populations will go away.
    
    John
27.144offer athletes a chance at a "real" degreeFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 14:1922
    The requirements to go to a state school in Oklahoma are probably
    the same in most states.  It's easy to get in--not always easy to
    stay in.  That's the way it should be too.  Everyone should have
    an equal shot at college.
    
    A problem is when athletes are expected to study AND participate 
    in sports.  Some are gifted enough (and/or have a good background)
    to take pre-med, engineering, law, etc., and still be a standout
    in sports.  What about the ones that don't have the same mental
    capacity?  They are in school to learn sports and that's where
    their interests are.  They should be allowed to take "sports"
    related classes and have the opportunity to get a degree in sports.
    At least they could get a sports-related job after graduation.
    (as a school coach, sports equipment sales, health spa, etc.)  There
    seems to be alot of talk about what some of these athletes are 
    majoring in--and I agree.  It seems that some schools have dumby
    classes set up for the athletes to take to give the appearance that
    they are going to school.  A real "sports degree" should be offered
    since that's what they are interested in.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.145MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Fri Feb 09 1990 14:265
    
    What does a degree in Physical Education entail?
    
    -Dick
    
27.146Some athletes are taking something else.FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 14:5513
    I don't know but during football games sometimes the player's
    major is displayed.  Some of these "majors" sound really phoney
    and that's a waste of time their time. A "real" sports degree
    should *have* to be offered to athletes and of course they would
    have to pass to play then.
    
    If this were the case at all schools participating in sports
    then it would be hard, IMO, to argue against the living expense
    payment to the athletes.  They would be attending school to work
    towards a "real" degree.
    
    Cowboy
     
27.147HEURIS::METZGERI will not Burp in classFri Feb 09 1990 15:517
ah yes...

The famous Undergradute Studies Major...Listed on at least 1/2 of the seniors 
for most any big-time (TM) college game...

Metz
27.148FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Feb 09 1990 16:176
    A Phys Ed major isn't as easy as it sounds.  There is a limit on
    how many "gym" classes one can take towards the degree.  A Phys
    Ed major must take Zoology, Physiology, Anatomy, Physiology of
    Exercise, Kinesiology and other science-oriented courses.
    
    John
27.149FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 16:205
    Then maybe that's why there are so many "Undergradute Studies Majors".
    Anyone know what this really is?
    
    Cowboy
    
27.150AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacFri Feb 09 1990 16:543
    Springfiled College, a school not nationally recognized for their
    sports program, is nationally known for their physical education
    department.
27.151There aren't many files on a P.E. major ...LUNER::BROOKSDrM : The Conscience Of SPORTSFri Feb 09 1990 17:567
    Phys Ed is serious business, especially if you want to get into
    sports medicine. I used to think it was a 'basket weaving' major
    until I met a few people who were serious P.E. majors.
    
    Quite a bit of biology and science ....
    
    DrM
27.152Can P.E. majors spell "flies", eh Dock? :-) SASE::SZABOOURGNG District Mad Whacker BailiffFri Feb 09 1990 18:041
    
27.153CAM::WAYNorm's best friendFri Feb 09 1990 18:045
I know I'm going to misspell this word, but they also have to
take a course called Kineseology, which is the study of how
the body moves, with it's muscles and tendons and everything...

Chainsaw
27.154FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Feb 09 1990 18:1512
    Kinesiology is the one.  In my undergraduate days, working as a
    student trainer, I took the science courses as electives that a
    PE major would need to take.  I took Zoology and Physiology as a
    sophomore and they were brutal because they were taught in the Zoology
    department.  Think of all those poor PE Majors in science classes
    with pre-med majors and you get the picture.
    
    Anatomy, Physiology of Exercise and Kinesiology were taught within
    the Exercise Science division of the school of Physical Education.
    While a little bit easier, they were still beasts.
    
    John
27.155USRCV1::COLOTTIRThick as a brickFri Feb 09 1990 19:588
    All this stuff about these "student-atheletes" learning how to become
    professional atheletes kills me. Less than 2% of college atheletes
    make a substantial living off of their chosen sport. Might be less
    than that. I agree with stipends, but I dont agree with illiterate
    college students. If you caint read, you caint play. Nyah,nyah.
    Doesnt seem unfairr, does it??
    			Raider_Rich
    
27.156Nobody said they shouldn't study...FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 09 1990 22:3123
    re: Raider_Rich
    
    I don't think anyone implied that student/athletes should be
    able to play if they can't read.  In fact, I was saying that
    the sports-colleges should have to offer "real" classes that
    fall into the athletes interests.  My thoughts were that these
    classes should help them get a job in sports--not basket-weaving
    that won't ever do anything for them.  Jobs like in health clubs
    and sporting shops, etc.  Kind of like a technical degree.
    (We're talking about the athletes a bit short on study habits
    or background. The other athletes would be taking normal classes
    of their choice.)
    
    My point is that the more people that are put into jobs and not
    on welfare or living off of crime the better we all are.  As it
    is now, many/most of the athletes are not going to make a dime
    as a pro, but they should get a shot at it.  As they are giving
    us fans enjoyment they could be *really* attaining a degree that
    will help them out--not sliding through classes and ending up
    with nothing but bad turf knees.
    
    Cowboy
      
27.157Bball scoresFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Feb 12 1990 12:0219
    Bball results:
    
    UNLV 100
    Oklahoma State 84
    
    Kansas State 93
    Colorado 65
    
    Missouri 107
    Nebraska 85
    
    Kansas 88
    Iowa State 83
    
    Oklahoma 89
    Seton Hall 84
    
    Cowboy
    
27.158standings, gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 13 1990 12:3822
    Bball today:
    
    Iowa State at Colorado (+1^)
    Kansas State at Oklahoma (-17)
    Missouri at Kansas (-6) 	 ESPN 5:30pm
    
    
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    		CONFERENCE		ALL GAMES 
    		W-L	 PCT.		 W-L	PCT.
    Missouri	8-1	 .889		22-2	.917
    Kansas	7-1	 .875		24-1	.960
    Oklahoma	5-2	 .714		17-3	.850
    Kansas St	4-4	 .500		14-10	.583
    Okla St  	4-5	 .444		13-9 	.591
    Nebraska	2-6	 .250		 9-12	.429
    Iowa State	2-6	 .250		 7-13	.350
    Colorado	1-8	 .111		 9-13	.409
    
    Cowboy
27.159Bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Feb 14 1990 12:1712
    Bball results:
    
    #2 Missouri 77
    #1  Kansas 71	Missouri beat Kansas for a second
    			time--this time in Kansas.
    
    Colorado 83
    Iowa State 60	CU wins in Boulder before a crowd
    			of 1,402 fans! (seats 11,199)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.160Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big EightMAMIE::GORDONWed Feb 14 1990 13:183
    Oklahoma at Missouri this Sunday scheduled for N.B.C.
    
    stayed tuned...should be a tough game for the Tigers....???
27.161FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Feb 14 1990 13:204
    Is this in Norman?  If so OU might win it in a close one.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.162OU lack of discipline offense might kill them...CNTROL::CHILDSCeltics destroy/destroyed the/by WestWed Feb 14 1990 13:3812
    
    Ou might win, if Missouri decides to run all night long like OU would
    like. Missouri I think plays better defense and can get more physical
    than OU. Kansas played great last night, except for a small stretch
    when Smith was on the bench for Missouri last night and his replacement
    really did an excellent job on clogging the lane but Missouri still
    won because they were able to physically control the game in the
    paint......
    
    Peeler sure knows how to go after his own misses.....
    
    mike
27.163Kansas is a great team...final four they'll be thereMAMIE::GORDONWed Feb 14 1990 16:2411
    what really got me was that Kansas was totally dominating the boards
    which is what you have to do to win games but then they had two
    spells where even though they controlled the boards they went down
    and took bad shots....toward the end Missouri started to rebound
    and made the stats closer I assume but Kansas should not have loss
    with the amount of rebounds(offensive and defensive) they had.
    
    Taking bad shots and not hitting from free throw line kills you
    every time. Always tell my kids:
    
    	" close games are won with rebounds, defense, foul shooting"
27.164Still looking for 4 BIG-8 teams to make it.FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Feb 14 1990 17:2110
           -< Kansas is a great team...final four they'll be there >-
    
    Yeah, they'll be there but so will Missouri and Oklahoma.  OU
    doesn't seem to be complete like the other two but all three
    should put up a good fight.  It looks like Kansas State and
    Oklahoma State still have a shot at getting in and in OSU's
    case I hope they slip in for the experience they'll gain.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.165Tigers are #1????????ELMAGO::RBARELAWed Feb 14 1990 23:4110
    If Peeler stays in control, Smith/Buntin control the defensive boards
    and the supporting cast plays within their game...Mizzio will win
    by alot.
    
    
    
    Ruben_who_picked_Tyson_to_win_in_the_first.
    
    
    
27.166RESULTSFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 15 1990 12:347
    Oklahoma 85
    Kansas State 69
    
    Oklahoma State 103
    Nebraska 84
    
    
27.167football recruitsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 15 1990 13:3037
    BIG-8 Football Recruits:
    
    OKLAHOMA and NEBRASKA did the best with COLORADO just behind.
    
    OU got Texas' top prospect, LB Aubrey Beavers and Oklahoma's
    top two prospects, QB Cale Gundy and TE Ricky Brady and
    Rangeview All-American RB Earnest Williams plus more good
    recruits from Texas.  Houston-based recruiting analyst Max
    Emfinger said, "It's one of the top recruiting classes ever
    for a team on probation."  
    
    Nebraska lost Dallas Safety C.J. Richardson to Miami after
    he pulled back on his commitment.  NU did get RBs Derek Brown
    and Calvin Jones although Brown was a Prop 48 last year and
    Jones may academic problems.  Also NU got All-American QB
    Todd Gragnano and LB Brian Havens from Calif.
    
    Colorado landed standout wingback Erik Mitchell from Calif.
    
    Missouri got a highly ranked QB from Missouri, Jeff Handy, who
    averaged 345 yards a game passing and Texas RB Ryan Lyons who
    rushed for 2,318 yards.  Also signed Kenneth Dunn, the 4th
    ranked WR, on analysts lists.  On defense UM added 5 juco
    players.
    
    Kansas landed 1 national recruit from Detroit, LB Sylvester
    Wright.
    
    Oklahoma State failed to sign anyone of note.  With their
    probation and their coaching staff leaving, OSU is in for
    bad times.  Ex QB Mike Gundy was recently hired as Receivers
    Coach and tried to win over his brother Cale but lost him,
    and Offensive Coordinator, to OU.
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.168BIG-8/ESPN contractFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 15 1990 15:0710
    BIG-8 Basketball deal:
    
    The BIG-8 just signed a contract with ESPN for next season.
    A BIG-8 game will be aired, along with a SE Conf game, every
    Tuesday night during January and February.
    
    This should help give some due respect to the conference.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.169More on football recruits...CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsThu Feb 15 1990 19:5725
    
    It sounds like Oklahoma came out with the best recruiting class
    in the Big-8.  Despite winning the conference and playing for the
    national title, the Buffs' class was considered near the bottom
    of the top 20 nationally.  CU just doesn't have the extensive training
    facilities, large stadium with consistent sellouts, or the tradition
    of other national powers.
    
    According to most analysts, some of the best classes were signed by 
    Florida State, Notre Dame, Texas A&M, Southern Cal, Ohio State, &
    Michigan, not necessarily in that order.         
                                                                        
    Here's one vote saying that the Jayhawks won't get any farther than
    the Sweet 16.  Since the Preseason NIT, the only top-notch competition
    they've played is OU and Missouri twice, and Missouri beat them
    both times.  As for the tourney selections, the Big-8 will probably
    get 4 teams, K-State being the fourth.  I don't think the committee
    will take both OSU and KSU, and KSU has the edge with wins over
    OU and Missouri.               
    
    A good game on SportsChannel tonight at 9 MST: New Mexico St. at
    UNLV.
    
    
    Joe
27.170Jayhawkers mad......FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 16 1990 12:2111
    Kansas U cancelled basketball games aginst Notre Dame during
    1992 and 1993 because of ND's decision to remove their home
    games from the 5-year deal with ABC and ESPN.  ND's decision
    will cost the CFA $50 Million.
    
    Bball tonight:
    
    Colorado at Oklahoma (-23)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.171Here's To You ND!CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsFri Feb 16 1990 13:1412
    
    YES!!!	
    Way to go KU!!
    
    I hope more big-name basketball schools follow suit and drop ND!
    
    
    Joe

                  
    
    
27.172Let's count the others to follow KUFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 16 1990 14:215
    That's the way I look at it too.  The schools need to do what's
    the best for ALL of them--not "look out for #1".
    
    Cowboy
    
27.173NBC Contract = Unfair AdvantageBSS::M_HENDERSONOh Well, Try Again Next YearFri Feb 16 1990 16:374
    My hats off to Kansas. Good job!!!
    
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.174A cry in the wilderness...MAIL::MCNIELFri Feb 16 1990 18:268
    I knew they had it in em.  I too hope the trend continues with other
    colleges folowing suit.  
    
    Remember:  God is a Jayhawk fan.
    
    
    
    Kansas Comet
27.175The Good Guys Will Overcome!!!FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 16 1990 19:457
    >	Remember:  God is a Jayhawk fan.
    
    No way!  He's always rooted for Oklahoma State who are battling
    the evil from Norman.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.176See you in Denver!MAIL::MCNIELFri Feb 16 1990 19:5759
    Joe & Co.,
    
    The Jayhawks "wont get any further than the Sweet 16".  
    
    What is this? 
    
    Aren't you confused, at least historically speaking, with Missouri's 
    inability to advance in the tourney?  In defense of our hawkers, 
    KU's strength this year, which typically has been a weakness in our 
    past (ala L. Brown & T. Owens) is KU's ability to win on the road.  
    We've always had trouble with scrappy KSU, ISU, OSU, even CU & NU on 
    the road, and, the out-of-conference road history has been a no show
    prior to the now Roy (in the bag "coach of the year") era.
    
    phew...dont get me going. 
    
    KU will easily get into the 16 because of a 1, 2, or 3 seed.  And,
    wont see peer caliber competition until it makes its second road trip.
    Yes, they could lose but it is unlikely...Pritchard, Gueldner, and
    Calloway have all been there, and know the goal is to win 6 away games 
    at 3 differnet sites.   
    
    No predictions here but, they will at least get to the Sweet 16 and
    probably the final 8, and. maybe even ah...never mind-I got carried away.
    
    And now something completely different: A Jayhawk fan plugging Missouri.  
                                            oooh...this is difficult.
    
    Missouri is a very good team.  They remind me of the '86 FINAL FOUR
    Jayhawk team of Manning, Kellogg, Thompson, Dreiling, & Hunter.  When 
    the Tigers are ON...like the '86 J-hawks...they are unstopable.  But,
    they also have the ability to beat themselves...mentally, certainly not
    physically (KSU for example).  Peeler (thank you Larry, we could of had 
    him) is a young playmaker with a lot of courage/confidence for a 
    Sophomore.  He is raw talent and will only get better.  Reminds me a
    little bit of a young Isiah Thomas.  Doug Smith, best big guy in the
    Big 8... but he is no Manning.
    
    I'm pulling for them, because I understand this maybe there last NCAA
    appearence for awhile.  They are under a full NCAA investigation.  No
    death sentence, but, probably 1 year out and a few painful recruiting
    years.
    
    OU?  no comment.  
    
    Other than:  Billy Tubbs & Barry Switzer - What's the difference?
    
    See you in Denver.
    
    
    Kansas Comet                                
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    This year is different. Missouri
27.177The Dark side of the forceMAIL::MCNIELFri Feb 16 1990 20:169
    Cowboy,
    
    Rightie oh mate.  I agree with you on the evil empire from the Norman.
    
    Maybe we could join forces.  Hon solo, obeewancanobie, and Darth.
    There is a sequel in this somewhere.
            
    
    Kansas Comet
27.178give 'em the photon torpedoesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Feb 16 1990 21:246
    Yeah Comet, whatever it takes to stamp out evil and corruption.
    It looks like it'll be tough to whip 'em in football for awhile
    but they should go down in the other sports.  
    
    Cowboy
    
27.179Let he who is w/o corruption cast the first stone! ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 19 1990 12:2718
    
    What?!  I'll give you baseball in the OU-OSU rivalry, Cowboy, but in 
    what sports is OU going down?  If these recruiting reports are accurate, 
    OU is looking better than I allowed for in my previous gloom-and-doom-
    for-the-90's notes.  Still can't get used to OU throwing the football,
    though.  Can this Gundy kid run the option if necessary, like Steve 
    Davis did?
    
    I'll agree with you on Tubbs; I've liked him even less than Switzer.
    At least Barry wasn't blatantly open about running up the score.  That
    and the fact that Tubbs hasn't yet proven that he can coach in the 
    last few minutes of a crucial game.
    
    God may indeed be on the side of State.  He just hasn't been doing a 
    very good job to date, that's all.
    
    glenn

27.180GO MIZZOU!!!!MAIL::SCHWENDEMANMy hair ... it's gone!!Mon Feb 19 1990 13:162
    MIZZOU 92
    OU     90
27.181bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 20 1990 12:5453
   > What?!  I'll give you baseball in the OU-OSU rivalry, Cowboy, but in 
   > what sports is OU going down?  If these recruiting reports are accurate, 
    
    Sorry glenn, I was playing hookie yesterday so have 1000s of notes
    to read this morning. Ahh, another busy day!
    
    I wasn't saying that the *quality* of OU sports is going down.  It's
    the that fact that OU will be going down in defeat to OSU in several
    sports this year. (insert smiley thing here)
    
    	Last I read, the cowboys were undefeated in wrestling (have you
    ever seen an OU/OSU match in Stillwater?  It gets really wild!!).
    In Baseball OSU usually handles the Sooners.  Same in golf (but who
    watches golf anyway.
    
    	In basketball and football, the Sooners are still ahead of course
    but the distance is narrowing quickly in bball.  As for football,
    with the recruits OU got this year--and the ones OSU didn't get--will
    be real lopsided for a few years.
    
    	I'm just glad there are more sports than football.
    
    
    OSU football:
    
    Jeff Bower, after 2 years as Offensive Coordinator at S. Miss,
    will take the same position at OSU.
    
    
    Bball results:
    
    Missouri 92
    Oklahoma 90
    
    Iowa State 84
    Loyola, Chicago 79
    
    Kansas 94
    Nebraska 67
    
    Kansas State 93
    Iowa State 90
    
    Oklahoma State 71 (Women)
    Arkansas State 68 (Women too)
    
    
    Game today:
    
    Oklahoma State at Kansas State (-4)  Will the winner go to the NCAA?
    
    
    Cowboy
27.182Cale GundyFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 20 1990 13:0115
    glenn, on Cale Gundy:
    
    I doubt he will be running the wishbone in normal OU style.  I
    can see him used as an option QB like his brother Mike was at
    OSU.  He broke Mike's high school passing records plus he has
    more size and is a better runner.  (Mike had very quick feet
    and was an excellent scrambler but was not a good straight
    ahead runner). Cale is probably too big to be a Holiway but
    with his arm and *good* legs has a chance to be very dangerous,
    complete QB.
    
    Wish he hadn't gotten away.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.183BballFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Feb 21 1990 12:2613
    Bball results:
    
    Kansas State 66
    Oklahoma State 60
    
    Today's games:
    
    Kansas at Colorado (+12)
    Iowa State at Missouri (-14)
    Oklahoma at Nebraska (+12)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.184FOOTBALL!!!!!!!!!FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Feb 21 1990 12:3111
    Kansas signed Bob Williams as Wide Receivers coach.
    
    Colorado and Tennessee were picked to play the Disneyland
    Pigskin Classic August 26 at Anaheim Stadium.  Kickoff
    is at 2:00pm MDT on a Sunday and shown on TV by Raycom.
    Both teams receive $550,000. (I believe that this game
    is in addition to their regular schedule -- not going
    to replace a game.)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.185Games/StandingsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Feb 22 1990 12:1233
    Results:
    
    Kansas 103
    Colorado 71
    
    Missouri 89
    Iowa State 85
    
    Oklahoma 88
    Nebraska 66
    
    
    Saturday Games:
    
    Kansas State at Kansas
    Nebraska at Iowa State
    
    
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    		CONFERENCE		ALL GAMES 
    		W-L	 PCT.		 W-L	PCT.
    Missouri   11-1	 .917		25-2	.926
    Kansas	9-2	 .818		26-2	.929
    Oklahoma	8-3	 .727		20-4	.833
    Kansas St	6-5	 .545		16-11	.593
    Okla St  	5-6	 .455		14-10	.583
    Nebraska	2-9	 .182		 9-15	.375
    Iowa State	2-9	 .182		 8-16	.333
    Colorado	2-10	 .167		10-15	.400
    
    Cowboy
27.186GO MIZZOU.....!!!!!MAMIE::GORDONThu Feb 22 1990 12:293
    sunday:
    
    Missouri at Oklahoma
27.187Tie for the Big 8 Tuesday!MAIL::MCNIELSun Feb 25 1990 22:4415
    Sooner fans,
    
    Congrats on the Mizzou win.  You caught Peeler & associates in 
    "brick-mode".  And yes, Tubbs looked liked Mugsie the gangster 
    in that double-breasted, horns toothed, cheesy lapel suit in front
    of national television.  Where's Elliot Ness when you need em?
    
    Of course "There's no place like home"
    
    See on tuesday.  I guess we'll both have to stomach Vital Dick.
    Did I get that backwards?  I dont think so.
    
                                   
    Kansas Comet
                                   
27.188bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Feb 26 1990 12:1917
    Bball results:
    
    Kansas 70
    Kansas State 58
    
    Iowa State 101
    Nebraska 85
    
    Oklahoma 107
    Missouri 90
    
    Oklahoma State 81
    Colorado 74
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.189crystal ball--sure betsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Feb 26 1990 14:1121
    The Sooners' at-home-win-streak continued to #44--second best in
    the nation--when they beat #1 Missouri.  Tuesday, soon-to-be #1,
    Kansas will fall prey (in my humble opinion) to the Sooners in
    Norman.
    
    Colorado's on-the-road-LOSS-streak-against-BIG8-teams continued
    against Oklahoma State (Loss #51).  It was a good, close game with
    both teams scoring good and having a rebound battle.  The difference
    was CU trying to keep up with the quick Cowboys and committed too
    many fouls.  OSU had 2 key players hurt--and they don't have much depth.
    Cowboy's Byron Houston scored 31 points.
    
    This Saturday, after the Sooners beat the second #1 team within
    a week will travel to Stillwater to play the Cowboys.  Of course
    the Sooner will fall to defeat to a improved (health-wise) OSU team.
    Look for this game to be a very emotional game as most of the "Bedlam
    Series" match ups are.  Denver channel 7 will cover the tape replay
    at 11:05 pm Saturday.
    
    Cowboy
     
27.190The Jayhawks Aren't In Kansas Anymore...29017::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsTue Feb 27 1990 15:388
    
    Have to agree with the previous reply that the Sooners will beat
    KU tonight, and I think it'll be real convincing.  OU should have
    some fun tonight.
    
    If OSU does beat OU this Saturday, that should be the win that gets
    the Cowboys into the tourney.  They probably kept their hopes of
    an NCAA bid alive by hanging on against CU Sunday.
27.191BIG-8 Lookin good9017::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 27 1990 16:0224
    Tonights game:
    
    Kansas at Oklahoma (-5^)   ESPN 5:30 Mountain time
    
    
    ****************************
     5 BIG-8 teams in the top 5
    ****************************
    
    >   			    AP POLL  (2-26-90)
    >
    >
    > RANK (1st Place votes)	RECORD	POINTS	PREVIOUS
    
    >  1 KANSAS (41)    	 27-2	1,570  	 2
    >  2 UNLV (14)               24-4	1,492  	 4
    >  3 MISSOURI (5)            25-3	1,448	 1
    >  4 Connecticut (1)         24-4	1,293	 6
    >  5 Duke (1)                23-5	1,288	 3
    >  tie OKLAHOMA    	         21-4 	1,288	10
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.192close BIG-8 race9017::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 27 1990 16:0914
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    		CONFERENCE		ALL GAMES 
    		W-L	 PCT.		 W-L	PCT.
    Missouri   11-2	 .854		25-3	.893
    Kansas     10-2	 .833		27-2	.931
    Oklahoma	9-3	 .750		21-4	.840
    Okla St  	6-6	 .500		15-10	.600
    Kansas St	6-6	 .500		16-12 	.571
    Iowa St 	3-9	 .250		 9-16	.360
    Nebraska  	2-10	 .167		 9-16	.360
    Colorado	2-11	 .154		10-16	.385
                                                    
27.193Jayhawks #1 for a day?34903::MCNIELTue Feb 27 1990 16:1823
    Cowboy,
    
    Now just a minute.  You want to talk emotional games?  What about
    tonight in Normam?  Vital will be his usual nut self and will be
    championing the Final 4 rematch from two years ago...not to mention 
    the OU loss in Lawrence (revenge factor).  And, in my opinion, if that
    were not enough hype, KU WILL WIN because they tie for the Big 8
    championship (at least on paper) with MU if they win tonight!
    
    Additional fun facts:
    
    - Roy and the boys are rested, OU is tired from Sunday.
    - OU cant possibly duplicate its scoring from the MU game 
      (only one place to go from up...)
    - Roy is a coach.  Billy is a den mother.
    - Away games motivate KU...not intimidate (like MU was)
    - KU's big men are bigger/taller & will control the paint.
    
    This is all wishful thinking of course, but on paper the hawks
    have this one.  
    
    Kansas comet
    
27.194they're playing like #19017::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 27 1990 16:3911
    comet,
    I wish we had cable and could watch this one!  It's hard to compare
    the Sooner team that lost to Kansas (in Kansas) 70-58(?) earlier.
    OU is playing good ball and with their win streak at home (44) they
    deserve the 5^ point spread.  Please don't call me a Sooner fan but
    they do have the advantage going in.
    
    Atleast both will go to the NCAA and play for the big one.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.195KU 105, OU 9034903::HERSHBERGERTue Feb 27 1990 16:5225
    Re: .193           Ditto to McNiel.
    
    K.U. will surprise the Cowboy with a solid defeat over the Sooners
    in similar fashion to the fast-paced K.U.- O.U. NCAA championship.
    O.U. will want revenge, but out-of-control emotion from Tubbs and
    his cronies are no match for Jayhawk discipline, composure, and
    quality coaching.
     
    Billy Tubbs' method of running a basketball team is to recruit the
    best possible athletes and then let them run out of control so as to
    confuse the enemy.  His recruiting ability is quite good, but he seems
    to measure coaching ability by how many technical fouls he receives.
    
    Of course, you know if those of us who publicly agree with .193 are
    wrong, the bits of revenge will flow across the network like salt in
    an open wound.  Where are the Sooner fans?  They are probably busy
    installing home security systems in fear of criminal activity by the
    Sooner football squad (are they out of jail yet?) during the off-season.  
    Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU.
      
    JHawk
                              
    
    
    
27.1969017::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 27 1990 17:076
    re:-last few Jawhawker crazies
    
    Like Tubbs style or not you can't forget OU's ability to win at home.
    KU has a good consistant team but OU's style can blow a team out
    of the game in a hurry.
    
27.197Bad Billy and Tark the Shark-same gene pool?34903::SCHWENDEMANMy hair ... it's gone!!Tue Feb 27 1990 17:1512
    We have the "Beasts of the East" in Georgetown.  Hmm, what is OU, the
    "Misfits of the Midwest"?  Here is a Tiger fan rooting for the Hawks to
    run up the score on bad Billy and his bunch of spitting gunners, even
    if it does mean the Hawks and Tigers tie for league leadership.
    
    How can you like a team that has free rein to shoot once they cross
    half court.  Sunday they had the good fortune of hitting >50% of their
    bombs, and 38% of their inside shots.  Also, the Peeler that killed KU
    was no where to be seen.  OU is on a roll, and are tough to beat in the
    Noble house of Norman.  Hopefully the streak will end tonight, and the
    real cream of the Big 8 will reside at the top.  Go HAWKS (that's
    really hard for a Mizzou fan to say)!
27.198FOOTBALL FOOTBALL FOOTBALL9017::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Feb 27 1990 17:368
    CBS is already planning on broadcasting the 3 games between the
    pre-season powers: Oklahoma, Nebraska and Colorado next fall.
    
    It wasn't mentioned if the OU games were to be tape-delayed.  Don't
    the Sooners have a couple more years of TV-less football?
    
    Cowboy
    
27.199Runnin' and gunnin' in Norman tonight!4156::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 27 1990 18:3112
    
    
    You're confusing your Cowboys with my Sooners, Cowboy. ;-) I'm pretty 
    sure that OU is back on TV this year, and next year back in the Orange 
    Bowl.  OSU is back on TV in 1991, and eligible for the post-season in 
    1992.
    
    Why are all these anti-Sooners coming out of the woodwork all of a 
    sudden?  Where's the conference pride, guys?
    
    glenn
    
27.200Vitale was at the wrong game...4156::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 28 1990 09:556
    
    Awesome!  How can you *not* like that style of play?  What was it, 
    27 Jayhawk turnovers?
    
    glenn
    
27.201Missouri Tigers #1 in the Big Eight...3168::GORDONWed Feb 28 1990 10:265
    Missouri will move back to #1 after they beat Kansas St. tonight...
    
    reason is UNLV loss to USCB, and Kansas loss to OU....
    
    stay tuned....
27.202Not As Close As The Score Might Indicate...29017::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsWed Feb 28 1990 10:5014
    
    It looks like KU was intimidated, not motivated.  The Jayhawks were
    never really in it, although they did cut it from a 22 point deficit
    to 10 just before half.  KU also trailed by 26 at one point in the
    second half, but managed to cut it to 12 or 14 a couple of times.
    Good thing the Sooners were tired and emotionally drained from Sunday's
    win over Mizzou, or it might have been worse.
    
    Big game tonight with CU at NU for 7th place!  If the Buffs win
    tonight, they can finish out of the cellar if NU loses their last
    game, which is against who, Cowboy?
    
    
    Joe
27.203All for one again, go Big 8!!34903::SCHWENDEMANMy hair ... it's gone!!Wed Feb 28 1990 10:5516
    re .200 & .201
    
    Don't know where my head was with the anti-Sooner stuff, although I am
    not a Tubbs fan.  I have had some good experiences in Norman watching
    my Tigers win in hoops and get Dupreed in football.  Congrats to the 
    Sooners on the thrashing of KU.  If all goes as expected the rest of the 
    week, we could have the Sooners at #1, MU #2, KU #3.  Go Georgetown 
    tonight against UConn.
    
    It will be a strong statement to the strength of the league to have a
    ranking like that from a "football" conference.
    
    Speaking of football, any chance for Missouri to return to some
    previous glory years and at least crack into the top 4 in the
    conference.  I'll always assume that OU and NU will take 2 of the
    spots, but who will the other 2 be next year?
27.20427.19534903::MCNIELWed Feb 28 1990 10:5615
    oops!
    
    Last night I kind of felt like Butch & Sundance being relentlessly
    pursued by the Sherriffs posse and saying - "Who are those guys?" 
    
    Brief notes sabatical here, til tourney time.  I hope we're not 
    out of gas.  Congrats Sooners...you were as good as it gets.  Hope you
    can take it on the road.
    
    My beak is temporarily out of joint,  
    
    
    Kansas Comet
                            
    
27.2058672::WADEI'm an excellent driver.....Wed Feb 28 1990 11:335
    re .203
    
    	Why the CU Buffs of course!  ;^)
    
    Clay
27.206FSHQA1::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Feb 28 1990 12:0516
    I don't know what Missouri's chances are next year, but I do know
    that Bob Stull is known for turning around football teams in a hurry.
    Bob took a declining UMass team that had gone 3-8 and got it to
    7-4 his second year.  When he left to go UTEP, the next year's team
    went 8-3.  At UTEP, he took one of the worst Division 1 teams in
    the USA and got it to a bowl in his 3rd year before leaving for
    Missouri.  I have no idea what the Tigers were like in football
    last year but if his previous history is any indication, they'll
    be OK.
    
    The only problem is that he was Don James' Offensive Coordinator
    for many years at the University of Washington, and it is rumored
    that he'll be James' hand-picked successor when it's time for James
    to retire.
    
    John
27.207close raceFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Feb 28 1990 16:0158
    > It will be a strong statement to the strength of the league to have a
    > ranking like that from a "football" conference.
    
    I pulling for OU to make it to #1 (a one week reign would be enough).
    Three teams in one conference ranked as #1 in a season!  Anyone know
    how many times this has been done by a conference?  The BIG-8 really
    shouldn't be considered a "football" conference when all the NCAA
    championships are considered.  After the leaders, UCLA and USC,
    Oklahoma State and then(?) Oklahoma follow as the schools with the
    most NCAA winners in all sports.
    
    > Speaking of football, any chance for Missouri to return to some
    > previous glory years and at least crack into the top 4 in the
    > conference.  I'll always assume that OU and NU will take 2 of the
    > spots, but who will the other 2 be next year?

    Here's my prediction:
    
    	Oklahoma
    	Nebraska
    	Colorado
        Iowa State
    	Missouri
    	Oklahoma State, Kansas and Kansas State (battle for the cellar)
    
    Hey glenn, are you sure that OU is off TV probation already?
    	time flies.......
    
    OSU hired Keith Armstrong as tight ends coach.
    
    I think CU has OU at CU, NU at OU and CU at NU.  Unfortunately, OSU
    will be lucky to stay out of last place next year.
    
    
    > Big game tonight with CU at NU for 7th place!  If the Buffs win
    > tonight, they can finish out of the cellar if NU loses their last
    > game, which is against who, Cowboy?
    
    CU has something to fight for--the losing streak of theirs--51 BIG-8
    consecutive road losses.  Not to mention winning the cellar spot again.
     
    
    			BIG-8 Standings
    
    		
    		CONFERENCE		ALL GAMES 
    		W-L	 PCT.		 W-L	PCT.
    Missouri   11-2	 .854		25-3	.893
    Kansas     10-3	 .769		27-3	.900
    Oklahoma   10-3	 .769		22-4	.854
    Okla St  	6-6	 .500		15-10	.600
    Kansas St	6-6	 .500		16-12 	.571
    Iowa St 	3-9	 .250		 9-16	.360
    Nebraska  	2-10	 .167		 9-16	.360
    Colorado	2-11	 .154		10-16	.385
    
    Cowboy
    
27.208Never Admit DefeatMAIL::HERSHBERGERWed Feb 28 1990 16:246
    OK.....so the Sooners beat us (Jayhawks) by millions of points and
    dominated the game very decisively.  Ya but, Glenn, I bet my dad can
    beat-up your dad with both arms tied behind his back.  So there.
    
    Jhawk (with a salted wound)
    
27.209FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Feb 28 1990 16:354
    Buck Up Jhawk.  There's still revenge at the tourney.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.210gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Mar 01 1990 10:5326
    Game results:
    
    Nebraska 96
    Colorado 82
    
    Missouri 65
    Kansas State 60
    
    Today:
    
    Oklahoma State at Iowa State (-3)   7:30 on ESPN (Mountain Time)
    
    
    CU's head basketball coach was fired Monday but it wasn't announced
    until after their 52nd consecutive BIG-8 on-the-road loss last
    night. CU's last win was against Kansas back in Feb 10, 1983.
    
    Missouri clinched the BIG-8 title with their win over Kansas State
    last night.
    
    OU is being called the #1 team in the nation by a Denver Post writer.
    Of course I'm hoping for the Cowboys to upset them in Stillwater this
    Saturday but would also love to see OU make it to #1.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.211NCAA Rankings PredictionMAIL::HERSHBERGERThu Mar 01 1990 12:0517
    Here is interesting possibility given the recent NCAA events:
    
    #5 O.U. defeated both #1 Missouri and #1 Kansas.  #7 Georgetown defeated
    #4 Connecticut.  #2 UNLV got upset by some obscure team from
    California.  #5-tied Duke got beat by Clemson.
    
    Here's my prediction:
    
       #1 Oklahoma
       #2 Missouri
       #3 Kansas
       #4 Georgetown
       #5 ???????
    
    Go Big-8!
    
    
27.212FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Mar 01 1990 13:055
    re:-1
    I'd like to see it!
    
    Cowboy
    
27.213OSU 70, OU 65MAIL::HERSHBERGERThu Mar 01 1990 15:005
    Question to Cowboy:
    
    How far up in the ranking could O.S.U. go if they beat Oklahoma?
    What would that do for their NCAA tournament bracketing?
    
27.214DWOVAX::EROSI got the lockout blues...Thu Mar 01 1990 15:256
    Re: .211
    
    Seems to me that you should swap #1 and #2 since Mizzou has also
    beaten Oklahoma and beat Kansas twice.
    
    -- FooBear
27.215bball gameFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Mar 02 1990 10:4915
    Game results:
    
    Iowa State 83
    Oklahoma State 72
    
    
    >    How far up in the ranking could O.S.U. go if they beat Oklahoma?
    >    What would that do for their NCAA tournament bracketing?
 
    Don't know but after OSU's game last night and the way OU's playing
    right now I expect the Sooners to blow out the Cowboys on Saturday.
    
    
    Cowboy           
    
27.216What Happened?MAIL::HERSHBERGERMon Mar 05 1990 12:3011
    Missouri got trounced by Notre Dame.  How?  Why?   
    
    I don't understand such an outcome, but Missouri just blew an excellent
    seating in the NCAA tourney and probably will get knocked down below
    the AP top 5.  Besides that, Missouri's lost blew my prediction for
    the upcoming NCAA rankings with OU, KU, and MU in the top 3.  I'm glad
    I didn't bet anything.
    
    Norm, what happened?  That is not a good way to begin March madness.
    
    JHawk
27.217gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 05 1990 12:4628
    Bball results:
    
    Kansas 96
    Iowa State 63
    
    Kansas State 80
    Nebraska 57
    
    Missouri 98		Missouri coach Norm Stewart said, "We just weren't
    Notre Dame 67	very good today, and I'd have a tough time explain-
    			ing that, so I won't."
    
    Oklahoma 107       	After only a 3 point lead at the half OU came back
    Oklahoma State 94   out with one of their patented runs of 27-4 and
    			looked to have started a blow out.  (OSU had led
    			much of the 1st half.)  OSU got fired up and staged
    			a comeback which got them to within 4 points with
    			3 minutes remaining but couldn't pull out the
    			upset.  This was another game typical of the the
    			"Bedlam Series" meetings of  OU and OSU.  I think
    			OU had atleast 2 and OSU 1 player foul out in this
    			emotional game.
    
    It looks like the BIG-8 will have 4 teams in the NCAA: Kansas, Kansas
    State, Missouri and Oklahoma.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.218BIG-8 tournament scheduleFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 05 1990 13:0325
    		The BIG-8 Tournament at Kemper Arena, Kansas City, MO
    
    Friday:       Saturday:    Sunday:
    
    KS 11:10am---
                 \________
                 /        \
    OSU----------          \
                    12.10pm ----------\
    UM 1:20pm ---          /           \
                 \________/             \
                 /                       \
    CU-----------                         \  
                                    2:20pm ----------  BIG-8 Champion
    OU 5:10pm ---                         /
                 \________               /
                 /        \             /
    NU-----------          \           /
                     2:20pm ----------/
    KU 7:30pm ---          /
                 \________/
                 /
    ISU----------
    
    
27.219How Low Can MU Get?CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsMon Mar 05 1990 13:4420
    
    Well, Missouri went out and TOTALLY embarrassed the Big-8 by losing
    to lowly Notre Dame.  What's even worse is the Irish are sure to
    get a bid to the tourney.  It would have been great to see ND get
    left out and playing in the "other tournament."
    
    Members of the selection committee could help get back at ND for
    breaking away from the CFA by not giving the Irish a bid, but it
    looks like they have to give them an invite now.  If ND didn't get
    into the tourney, it would have cost them about $250,000 per round.
    At least KU got back at ND, even if Mizzou didn't.  Thanks for nothing,
    Tigers.
    
    It's too bad that the best matchup of the Big-8 tourney is the first
    one in the middle of the day, when none of us working stiffs can
    see it. 
    
    
    Joe
    
27.220re: .216 and others...WOODRO::GORDONMon Mar 05 1990 13:4720

	Looking at their point output(67) leads me to believe that the kids
just couldn't get up for this one. With NCAA's and conference play comming
up and the last game of a l..o..o..n...n..g..g season can you blame them???

	I'm not taking anything away from the Irish cause they came to play
and did a great job, but I have to feel that Mizzou along with other top
team are getting worn out. The college season is too long and the conference
play only serves to put money in the cash registers. Why play all season and
win your conference and then have a dam playoff to decide the winner??? Sorta
doesn't make much sense except to enhance some college administrator career
when he/she says I brought in x amount of dollars when I was blah blah blah...

	It's time the people that administer these things started thinking about
the dam kids....as it stand now athletes in college are nothing more than a
product that are used to bring in money with no reguard for the athlete at all.
Many are just getting burned out....

	Bobby Knight was right....
27.221BIG-8 TOURNAMENT PICKSFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 05 1990 14:2615
    My BIG-8 Tournament picks:
    
    1st ROUND:         SEMI-FINALS:       FINALS:
    
    OSU over KS
                       UM over OSU
    UM over CU
                                          OU over UM
    OU over NU
                       OU over KU
    KU over ISU
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.222Over-Rated Conference that's all ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSWatch out MSG, here I come GO FRIARSMon Mar 05 1990 14:381
    
27.223Just correcting a typoFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 05 1990 14:426
  <<< Note 27.222 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Watch out MSG, here I come GO FRIARS" >>>
                   -< UNDER-Rated Conference that's all  ;^) >-
                      ^^^^^
    
    Hoping this helps
    
27.224Nice gesture, but a bit hypocritical, IMHO.RHETT::KNORRInnocent Contest JudgeMon Mar 05 1990 15:046
    Much as I *detest* Notre Dame, I can't help imagine them getting a
    chuckle out of having a team on probation getting holier-than-thou on
    them.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
27.225Some rambling thoughtsMAIL::SCHWENDEMANMy hair ... it's gone!!Tue Mar 06 1990 12:4221
    re .216 and .219
    
    Yes, Mizzou did probably blow a #1 seed and the opportunity to knock ND
    out of the tournament.  #$%^&*!!  They played poorly and deserved to
    lose.  No excuses.
    
    My hope is that they have gotten their usual post-Big 8 tournament
    disappointment out of their system now.  Believe me, I have suffered
    through many long months of March thanks to schools like Lamar, Xavier,
    Iowa, and others I care to forget.  I still look for the Big 8 to get a
    minimum of 4 teams in the NCAA's, and maybe a fifth if OSU does well in
    Kansas City.
    
    Of the big 3, OU, KU, MU, I would expect to see all of them reach the
    final 16, but unfortunately I doubt this year will be a repeat of 1988. 
    KU and MU seem to have peaked, OU is playing well but has not won too
    many close games, especially if the score is kept under 90 or even 100.
    
    Hope I'm wrong.  GO YOU TIGERS!!!
    
    John
27.226Could be back to the wishbone...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 06 1990 12:487
    
    I've read rumors that OU's quarterback recruit, Cale Gundy, is an
    excellent baseball prospect and is considering turning pro this summer,
    after the amateur draft.  Cowboy, you heard anything about this?
    
    glenn
    
27.227OSU takes the BIG-8!!!!!!!!!!!FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Mar 06 1990 12:5312
    OKLAHOMA STATE TAKES THE BIG-8 TOURNAMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!1
    
    McGill scored 16 points to lead OSU to a 72-65 win over
    Kansas State, giving OSU their first BIG-8 Tournament 
    title and an automatic NCAA Tournament birth.
    
    Way to go Oklahoma State!!!!
    
    Cowboy
    
    
    PS That was the CowGIRLS winning the title.   0 8^D
27.228baseball poll 3-5-90FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Mar 06 1990 12:5923
    Baseball America Rankings 3-5-90
    
     1. Wichita State    8-0
     2. Florida State	14-2
     3. Stanford	16-5
     4. Georgia Tech	12-1
     5. OKLAHOMA STATE	 8-0
     6. Miami, Fl	15-2
     7. Southern Cal	12-7
     8. Illinois	 7-5
     9. Texas		16-7
    10. Arizona St	16-8
    11. Creigton	10-0
    12. Arkansas	 8-2
    13. L. Beach St	15-6
    14. UCLA		14-6
    15. Loy. Marmt	11-6
    16. Miss. St	 5-4
    17. Georgia		10-4
    18. Clemson		 6-1
    19. S. Jose St.	13-1
    20. Fresno St	 9-7
    
27.229Colorado doesn't know Oklahoma sportsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Mar 06 1990 14:0811
    glenn, 
    
    I haven't hear anything about Cale Gundy yet, other than he's
    supposed to be in Norman next year.  Also, I didn't know Cale
    knew baseball.  I hope he does play football *somewhere* after
    all the hype about him.
    
    Living in a vacuum
    
    Cowboy
    
27.230good representation from ALL teamsFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Mar 07 1990 12:4026
    		All-BIG-8 team:
    
      1st TEAM:
    Doug Smith		Missouri, jr, 6-10, 215
    Keven Prtichard 	Kansas,	sr, 6-3, 180
    Anthony Peeler	Missouri, so, 6-4, 188
    Byron Houston	Okla St, so,6-7, 225
    Shaun Vandiver	Colorado, jr, 6-10, 220
    
      2nd TEAM:
    Skeeter Henry	Oklahoma, sr, 6-7, 180
    Steve Henson	Kansas St, sr, 6-1, 180
    Mark Randall	Kansas, jr, 6-9, 230
    Nathan Buntin	Missouri, sr, 6-9, 215
    Victor Alexander	Iowa St, jr, 6-9, 265
    
      HONORABLE MENTION:
    William Davis, OU		Clifford Scales, NU
    Stevie Wise, CU		Jean Derouillere, KSU
    Rick Calloway, KU		Lee Coward, MU
    Jackie Jones, OU		Damon Patterson, OU
    Rich King, NU		Doug Collins, ISU
    Terry Woods, ISU		Jeff Gueldner, KU
    Royce Jeffries, OSU		Smokey McCovery, OU
    Terry Evans, OU
    	
27.231Another tourney predictionCX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsWed Mar 07 1990 19:3621
    
    Might as well put in a tourney pick, since this note has been somewhat
    quiet lately:
    
    1ST Round           Semi's            Final
    
    KSU over OSU
                      KSU over UM
    UM over CU
                                       OU over KSU
    OU over NU
                      OU over ISU
    ISU over KU
    
    I realize there's some big upsets in there, but you never know.
    It's tournament time!!
    
    
    Joe
                                                  
    
27.2321st Round LineFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Mar 09 1990 10:409
    1st ROUND:
    
    Colorado vs. Missouri (-18)
    Oklahoma St vs. Kansas St (-4^)
    Nebraska vs. Oklahoma (-21)
    Iowa St vs. Kansas (-12)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.233CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsFri Mar 09 1990 15:322
    If someone hears a final on the KSU-OSU game, please pass it on.
    That game should be ending a little after 1:00.
27.234CSCOA5::ROLLINS_RFri Mar 09 1990 15:571
	Second half score, KSU 53, OSU 50
27.235radio/tvFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Mar 09 1990 16:184
    Is there a radio station carrying the games?
    
    Cowboy
    
27.236CU-MU on radioCX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsFri Mar 09 1990 16:337
    The only game I'm aware of on the radio is the CU-Missouri game
    this afternoon on KYBG, AM 1090 out of Denver.  This station doesn't
    come in very good down here in Colorado Springs, but you can pick
    it up in the daytime.
    
    
    Joe
27.237CSC32::J_HERNANDEZThe prostitution rests!Fri Mar 09 1990 17:031
    If you go to the Dublin House, they will probably be showing the games.
27.238Incase you missed it....FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Mar 09 1990 17:1612
    Finals Clemson 79-70 Wake Forest
           Uconn 76-58 Seton Hall
           Okie St 82-78 Kansas St.    <---------------------- YES!!!
           Texas 92-84 Tex A & M
           Mia,Ohio 108-80 Toledo
           Miss 84-80 Tenn  30 seconds left
    Half time N.C. 35-34 Virginia
              Georgetown and Providence tied at 33
    
    Cowboy
    
    
27.239CSCOA5::ROLLINS_RFri Mar 09 1990 17:171
	Final: Oklahoma State 82, Kansas State 78
27.240Here's a score....FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Mar 09 1990 17:197
    A score just in:
    
    Oklahoma State 82
    Kansas State 78
    
    Cowboy
    
27.241CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsFri Mar 09 1990 17:466
    This loss will seriously hurt the Wildcats' chances at an NCAA bid,
    while keeping OSU's slim chances alive.  Nevertheless, OSU or KSU
    has to get a bid based on the strength of the Big-8.
    Tune in Sunday afternoon.
    
    Joe
27.242SAGE::ROSSDoug Vs. The VolcanoFri Mar 09 1990 17:521
Missouri was losing by a dozen early in their game with Colorado...
27.243the best part of the season starts now....FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Mar 09 1990 18:038
   
    The Cowboys will go against Missouri next (unless Colorado upsets MU).
    Although I picked Misouri to beat OSU in the 2nd round you still can't
    count out the Cowboys.  They are playing with more confidence and
    Missouri may be "coasting" some until the NCAA.
    
    GO Cowboys
    
27.244CSCOA5::ROLLINS_RFri Mar 09 1990 18:4011
	Final score:
	Central Michigan 82, Kent State 65

	Second half scores:
	Colorado 49, Missouri 37
	Louisiana State 47, Auburn 37
	Houston 70, Rice 62

	First half scores:
	UCLA 39, Oregon 25
	New Mexico State 15, Fresno State 15	
27.245now "go CU"FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterFri Mar 09 1990 18:487
    > 	Second half scores:
    > 	Colorado 49, Missouri 37
    
    Maybe CU will help OSU get to the NCAA!?
    
    Cowboy
    
27.246Just Maybe...CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes: 1989 National ChampsFri Mar 09 1990 19:072
    CU and MU have just went to OT.  The Buffs blew a 9-point lead with
    a little more than a minute to go.
27.247CSCOA5::ROLLINS_RFri Mar 09 1990 19:353
		Colorado 92, Missouri 88 OT final

	SEC:	Auburn 78, LSU 76  final
27.248GENRAL::GIBSONMon Mar 12 1990 13:0018
    
    Rats! Boy was I hoping CU would beat OU for the BIG-8 "title". That
    would have served the NCAA selection committee right for giving
    automatic bids to the winners of these stupid end of season crap shoots
    and call them the conference champs. That epitomizes why these end of
    season tournaments are a joke. CU is not a good team. They got
    lucky/hot for two games and almost were given the conference title.
    
    For those who missed it, Oklahoma St. showed their sportsmanship on
    Saturday. With 3 seconds left in the game, and CU the obvious winner,
    an OSU player threw an elbow to the face of a CU player. Then this same
    idiot went over to the CU bench and punched another CU player. Then
    there was a big pile up. To OSU's coaches credit he was tossing his
    players all over the place. He was not pleased with their very poor
    sportsmanship.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
27.249GRANPA::DFAUSTNew Sears=Old K-MartMon Mar 12 1990 13:0812
    I'm pretty sure that the comference itself is allowed to determine
    which champion goes to the NCAA tourney, the regular season or the
    tournement Champ. And even if the Tourney champ has to go, more
    conferences could be like the Big 10 and not have an "end of the season
    crap shoot". But, of course, that won't happen because the crap shoot
    brings in lots of $$$ to the conferences.
    
    There are a lot of things you can slam the NCAA for, but i don't think
    thaty this is one of them.
    
    Dennis
    
27.250FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Mar 13 1990 10:3718
    I don't remember all the scores from the BIG-8 tournament:
    
    1ST Round           Semi's            Final
    
    OSU over KSU
                      CU over OSU/82-72
    CU over UM
                                       OU over CU/92-80
    OU over NU
                      OU over KU/95-77
    KU over ISU/118-75
    
    
    OSU Bball:  John Potter (guard/forward) was suspended for an
    undetermined amount of time for fighting in Colorado game.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.251wrestlingFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterTue Mar 13 1990 10:4312
    Wrestling:
    
    Oklahoma State won their 4th consecutive BIG-8 title
    
    	Scoring:
    Oklahoma State	83.25
    Nebraska		70.5
    Oklahoma		67.5
    Iowa State		57.75
    Missouri		18.5
    
    Cowboy         
27.252GENRAL::GIBSONTue Mar 13 1990 13:399
    
    Three cheers for OSU's b-ball coach for suspending Potter. I don't know
    who he is, big guy, but he was obviously PO'd coach after the cheap
    shot elbow and sucker punch at the end of the CU game. He litterally
    threw two players across the floor with one hand as he pulled them off
    a pile.
    
                                                   HOOT
    
27.253Baseball scoresFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Mar 14 1990 10:3613
    Baseball scores:
    
    Iowa State 3
    Washington State 2
    
    Rice 2-3
    Kansas 1-8
    
    Texas A&M 2
    Iowa State 0
    
    Cowboy
    
27.254Bracket AnalysisCX3COM::J_COTANCHGo Virginia (in Round 1 only)Wed Mar 14 1990 11:5128
    Some observations on the tourney brackets:
    
    -What in the world is ND doing in the tournament?!?  I guess it
     is quite obvious that the committee wants a marginal team in there
     that's a good draw instead of a team that really deserves it, e.g.
     Southern Illinois, Long Beach St., or DePaul(who beat ND twice).
     Oh, what a coincidence, the ND-UVa game is on ESPN Friday night!!
     They know everybody will tune in to that one, because everyone
     loves to see ND lose.
    
    -The Big West Conference got shafted by the committee, by either
     letting UCSB or Long Beach St. in, depending on the outcome of
     Big West championship game.  The worst part is that the committee
     admitted they were "punishing" the Big West for playing its
     championship game so late on the day of the selections.
    
    -It's apparent that the death of Gathers seriously hurt the seeding of
     LMU, because they only got a #11 seed, when they probably would
     have gotten a 5 or 6 seed had he not died.
    
    -Georgia Tech only got a 4 seed after winning the ACC tournament,
     and Alabama only got a 7 seed after winning the SEC tournament,
     and got shipped out to the West. 
    
    -Arizona a #2 seed?  I don't understand this one.
    
    
    Joe
27.255RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONo matter where you go,there you areWed Mar 14 1990 12:1315
    The selection committee usually picks an independent or two to go
    to the tourney.  While DePaul beat ND twice, they didnt' do much
    (at least in the games  I saw them) - and ND did have a few big
    victories.  For weeks they figured it would come down to DePaul
    and ND getting one independent spot.  I kind of think ND's win over
    Syracuse really helped seal it.
    
    And while they may not be deserving, neither are a lot of the bigger
    schools that made it.  Oh yeah, I forgot, it's all due to the ND
    conspiracy, right?  ND isn't the only 'marginal' team in there that's
    a bettter draw than some of the second or third echelon teams. 
    Is it fair, no, but ND is hardly the root of the problem, the all
    glorious NCAA and CBS is.
    
    JD
27.256KU vs. LSU in the FINALSMAIL::MCNIELWed Mar 14 1990 15:4012
    Joe,
    
    I agree.  Arizona #2 seed?  Who are those guys?....and weren't they
    ranked #15 prior to the NCAA's?
    
    Hey, anybody know anything about New Mexico St?  
    
    I hear they are a serious Dark horse and could possibly upset 
    Michigan and then Arizona?  I this reality or is somebody 
    smokin there socks??
    
    Kansas Comet
27.257LEVERS::STROUTpure black looking clear...Wed Mar 14 1990 15:425
    
    	re: New Mexico St.
    
    	They have to get past an unequalled emotionally determined LMU
    first.
27.258Go Aggies!FTMUDG::DUGGANWed Mar 14 1990 16:2743
    re: New Mexico State:
    
    They are for real. I must admit to a certain amount of prejudice, being
    as how my college diploma starts with the words "The Regents of the New
    Mexico State University..."
    
    But... I have also been a bigtime college basketball fan for
    twenty-five years, and can say with all honesty that I have never seen
    a quicker team than this year's Aggies. I have seen better, and faster,
    and stronger, but not quicker.
    
    The Ags are quite capable of scoring 125 points in any game. If there
    were an over/under line for the Aggie/LMU game it would have to be in
    the low four figures. 8*)
    
    Their best player is Ron Brown, a transfer from Houston. Most of the
    Ags are from the Chicago area. 
    
    Coach Neal McCarthy is an old NCAA hand, having taken Weber State
    there several times. His players adore him because he is a teacher as
    well as a coach. His philosophy is "Play -- HARD."
    
    This year they split with UTEP and swept the traditional two-game
    series with New Mexico, winning in the Pit by four points. They beat
    UNLV for the first time ever in a real thriller on Jan. 8 in Las
    Cruces. 
    
    They play the style of ball that so distresses Eastern basketball
    aficionados; along with LMU, Oklahoma, and UNLV; run, run, run with a
    very sticky pressing defense. (I believe the Ags did, in one game, hold
    the ball for seven seconds.) In fact, the teams that give them the 
    toughest games are those who can run with them.
    
    The Ags were among the top ten teams in number of turnovers forced,
    averaging over 22 turnovers forced per game. 
    
    In fact, I believe one of the best games in the first round will be the
    LMU-Aggie game. Don't try to keep score; you'll set the paper on fire.
    Just sit back and enjoy some bigtime basketball.
    
    
    
    ..mike the Aggie
27.259New Mexico StateMAIL::HERSHBERGERWed Mar 14 1990 17:0214
    Unfair advantage McNiel.  You didn't say that you would be polling the
    notes file for information about the NCAA before you entered your NCAA
    tourney picks.  
    
    New Mexico State sounds like a potential surprise team for the tourney
    and I noticed that you picked them to make the final 16.  If you win
    the contest because New Mexico State goes far, I think you should buy
    everyone in the WIO office a piece of pie.
    
    Whoever is listening out there.  I want to know more New Mexico State
    and which teams they have defeated, etc.  Are they capable of Final
    Four competition?
    
    JHawk            
27.260More on NMSUCX3COM::J_COTANCHGo Virginia (in Round 1 only)Wed Mar 14 1990 19:2922
     
    RE: New Mexico State (from USA Today)
    
    Strengths: Defense; its solid matchup zone and team quickness combine
    to force 22 turnovers a game from opponents.  William Benjamin has
    been strong off bench.
    
    Weakness: Aggies attack by letting their guards penetrate and pass.
    When that's cut off, or they're faced with a packed-in zone, their
    outside shooting can let them down.  
    
    The Aggies are the first team to win or share the Big West title
    since UNLV joined in '82-'83.
    
    I saw them play twice.  The first was against New Mexico in December,
    and I don't remember much from that one.  The other time was against
    UNLV in Vegas, and the Rebels blew them out, mainly to the fantastic
    night shooting the Rebels had; UNLV was 10 for 13 in the first half
    on 3-pointers in that game.
    
    
    Joe
27.261bball gamesFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterThu Mar 15 1990 10:3822
    
    NCAA Women--1st round:
    
    Michigan 77
    Oklahoma State 68	Cowgirls were leading 33-31 at the half in their
    			1st NCAA Tournament appearance.
    
    
    NCAA line:
    
    Oklahoma (-27) vs. Towson State
    Kansas (21^) vs. Robert Morris
    Missouri (-13) vs. N. Iowa
    Xavier, Ohio (-2) vs. Kansas State
    
    
    NIT game today:
    
    Tulsa at Oklahoma State (-7)
    
    Cowboy
    
27.262Tiger DepressionMAIL::SCHWENDEMANMy hair ... it's gone!!Fri Mar 16 1990 16:1716
    Score just in - Northern Iowa 74   Missouri 71.  Peeler with one basket
    (in the last minutes to boot) and Doug Smith fouled out with 9 minutes
    to go.
    
    A sad end to a season that looked sooooo... promising a month ago after
    the sweep of the Jayhawks.  To finish the season with the blowout at
    Notre Dame, the loss to Colorado, and now this!  Can I change the title
    on my diploma?
    
    Go rest of the Big 8.  Learn from a disappointed Tiger to never count
    on them in the postseason.  Add N. Iowa to the list of powers like
    Xavier, Lamar and others who have brought solid Mizzou teams to the
    ground.
    
    A disappointed Tiger now pulling for the Jayhawks.
    John
27.263Call me cynical, but I just can't believe this.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Mar 16 1990 16:2414
    If this were the New York Times I wouldn't say anything, but since it's
    SPORTS, what the hey.
    
    Someone mentioned a week or 2 ago about drug rumors swirling around
    Anthony Peeler.  Am I the only one who's a bit suspicious when a kid of
    his immense talents only scores *ONE* basket in an NCAA Tournament
    game??  (Please spare me the z-inducing "Nothing has been proven" stuff. 
    We've heard enough of that over in the Hank note and this is obviously
    sheer conjecture.  I must say though this kind of performance adds to
    the credibility of the rumors.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
27.264RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOHey, NICE hat!~Fri Mar 16 1990 16:3812
    Chris,
    
    That's one of the things about today's sports scene - I also wonder
    now if a player's 'off' day or 'off' year is caused by chemicals,
    and not fate.  I hope it is just an off day for him.
    
    On the same line - I wondered why, IMO, Roy Marble's play seemed
    to slip last year.  I thought he was super as a soph, but didn't
    feel he developed, and even slipped a bit.  When I read earlier
    this year that he had been suspended by the NBA, I wondered if the
    problem existed lasted year also.... sigh.
    JD
27.265LUNER::BROOKSHi ! I'm Jim Jupiter ...Fri Mar 16 1990 16:5018
    re -1
    
    I know what you mena JD.
    
    A fews years back, UH was in teh Final Four against North Carolina.
    Their big gun was All-American Rob Williams. (Akeem was a freshman,
    and was showing the signs of greatness, but was unpolished.)
           
    Rob had been pick the MVP of the Regionals the week before.
    
    Well, he went 0-8 for 2 pts against NC, and the Coogs lost by 6.  
    
    He was drafted by th NUggest in the 1st round, bombed out, and hasn't
    done anything since, due to drugs.
    
    It turns out now, that Rob was snorting coke and partying, and didn't
    get to his room (in New Orleans) until 4AM the same day of teh NC
    game .....
27.266Xavier, N. Iowa, N. Carolina, & UCLA?MAIL::MCNIELSun Mar 18 1990 19:1511
    Big 8 fans,
    
    In leiu of what happened over the weekend...
    I think I speak for everyone in this notes conference when I say -
    
    "Go Ball State!!!" 
    
    
    Kansas Comet
    
    
27.267Go Xavier! SNDCSL::HAUSRATHWho,Stones in '89. Zep in '90Mon Mar 19 1990 09:546
    
    Awesome showing from such a power-house conference.  
    
    These guys make the big 10 look good!
    
    /Jeff
27.268Hoof in Mouth DiseaseRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 19 1990 09:5713
    (approximately) "The ACC is the most overhyped conference in country."
    
    - Billy Tubbs
    
    
    Well Bill, how's it feel to get bounced from the tourney for the 2nd
    year in a row by an ACC team?
    
    Never prouder to be,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
27.269Most overrated conference? No doubt!4159::NAZZAROThanks Minutemen, for a GREAT year!!Mon Mar 19 1990 10:013
    BTW - how many teams from the Big 8 are left in the tourney?  ;-)
    
    NAZZ
27.270Starting to look forward to baseball now...FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 19 1990 10:3213
    The BIG-8 looked tough--until BIG-8 Tournament time.  That's
    when the "power houses" slacked off and the upsets began.
    Missouri started their slide just before the tourney against
    Notre Dame.
    
    Oh well, anyone know when the NCAA wrestling meet is?  Maybe
    this coming weekend?
    
    Oklahoma State is still alive in the NIT and visiting New
    Mexico (-5) Tuesday.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.271BIG local news---BUSTY HEART in town...FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 19 1990 10:3817
    Oh yeah, how could I forget!!!!!
    
    BUSTY HEART--"America's BIGGEST Sports fan"   (That's how she's billed)
    
    		live show
    
    	at PT's & BOOGIE DOWN
    
    Thursday, Friday, Saturday
    
    
    [80 MMM 26-32]    atleast that's what the paper said.  The
    		      picture does make her look like she's
    		      way past the training bra stage.
    
    BUSTY HOTLINE-934-9370  for more information
    
27.272Bye, bye Big EightSHALOT::HUNTSend lawyers, guns, and money ...Mon Mar 19 1990 10:5615
Shows you how much the polls mean ...

Once Kansas got on top in December, the only way they could relinquish No. 1
was to lose.  Their only losses would come to conference foes.   Therefore, 
the conference foe that would beat them would take over No. 1.

So, first Mizzou and then Oklahoma would take turns sharing the top spot with
Kansas.

Come tournament time and this so-called "Big Three" wasn't ready for the 
leaner, hungrier teams with records chewed up by tougher conference play.

And now they're gone ...

Bob Hunt
27.273big 8 = BIG disappointment.. what a jokeLEVERS::STROUTpure black looking clear...Mon Mar 19 1990 11:041
    
27.274It ain't easyFTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 19 1990 11:1616
    The top 64 teams seem to all be capable of beating each other.  When
    you consider the close games and upsets early in the tourney the
    strengths must be fairly close.  If a team is to make it to the
    Final Four they must play each game like it is for the championship
    and not let down.  I expect that, atleast in OU's case, they may
    have been trying to take it easy--expecting to win against the
    lower rated teams.  
    
    I guess my point is that even though the one that wins the championship
    deserves all the credit and glory but on the other hand if that team
    would play an unranked team a week later they might loss.  It's all in
    how well a team can keep playing at a level above everyone else (and
    above their own level?) and not lose their momentum.
    
    Congrats to the winners...Cowboy
    
27.275COOKIE::MJOHNSTONBetter Living Through Chemicals!Mon Mar 19 1990 11:4625
	I have no special feelings pro or con for Snuffy Smiff and the boys,
and I also never lost anything in Oklahoma, so I just watched the game for fun,
and really didn't care much who won.

	1) North Carolina looked a LOT better than the games I had seen about
mid season.

	2) Both teams had some awkward moments... but

	3) I've been watching a lot of hoop, and at that particular time, I
don't think there was another team in the country who could have beat either NC 
OR OU.

	4) I  have to give Snuffy credit. A couple of times he had one or
another of his kids do something relatively stupid. They'd pan the camera over
towards him, and  Smiff would just be kind of nodding and giving a thumbs up to
the kid, like ` No problem, kid, pull it together and go gettem'. At first it
surprised me, because if one of my ten year olds did something so stupid, I'd
be in his face (and these guys are in COLLEGE), but he's right, and I do the
same thing myself: by the time you get to the playoffs, they either know what
they're doing or they don't, so you might as well just offer encouragement when
needed and relax, because it's really too late to be trying to teach them
anything.

Mike JN
27.276GENRAL::WADEThat midnight train is whinin' low..Mon Mar 19 1990 11:5510
    So, the Big 8 is a joke?  Gimme a break!  It's all a matter of
    who's hot when the NCAA tourney starts.
    
    If the tourney were held at the beginning of the season, Kansas
    probably would have won it......they knocked off the #1 and #2
    ranked teams in the country.  I didn't hear anybody calling the
    #1 and #2 teams' conferences a *joke* then.  It's not fair to
    call the Big 8 a joke now..........GO LMU, BALL ST., AND XAVIER!
    
    Claybone
27.277A big, big win, no question.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 19 1990 12:1622
    The win over Oklahoma had to be one of the sweetest for Dean in a long
    time, mainly because he had a chance to play a role he's not used to: 
    UNDERDOG.  Heck, the line on the game was 8.5 points.  The line on the
    California vs. UConn game, IN HARTFORD, was only 7!  They were giving
    California a better chance than UNC.
    
    Anyway I think your analysis is right Monty.  At this point in the
    season there's no pointing getting too upset about anything a player
    does anymore than to complain about the poker hand you've just been
    dealt.  Ya gotta play the cards you got and you ain't gettin' any new
    ones.
    
    Dean was funny in the post-game interview, uncharacteristically so.  He
    was practically giddy.  Kinda joy-drunk if you will.  I was dying when
    he disclosed that at half-time he got down on his knees and begged 'em
    to do one thing -- WIN.  That answer wasn't exactly what I woulda
    expected from Deano!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    
27.278No need: Tubbs muzzles selfNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 19 1990 12:5420
    
    Tubbs only has himself to blame.  I expressed my reservations about his
    coaching come tournament time in an earlier note, and he's come through
    again.  My question: why does OU get away from their all-out press, 
    run-and-gun style in the NCAA's?  This is not to take anything
    away from UNC, because their strategy was a big part of reason that OU 
    never got untracked.  I'll admit I'm not a sophisticated basketball
    fan, but this was not the same team, playing with the same intensity,
    that I saw blow Kansas off the court twice in the last three weeks.
    If Tubbs likes the frenetic style, I wish he'd follow through with it 
    all the way to the end.  Shades of OU-Kansas in the 1988 Finals...
    
    I must admit, though, that both teams played well throughout.
    Great games this weekend, but many of them showed one team struggling
    over large periods of the game.  Not this one.  UNC-OU were trading 
    baskets and 3-pointers right and left down the stretch, which made 
    for an extremely tense and exciting game from my vantage point.
    
    glenn

27.279A little strategy analysisRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 19 1990 13:1424
    OU found themselves in a real Catch-22 in this game.  It was pretty
    obvious in the 1st half that they had 2 ways to stop Carolina.  One was
    there 1-3-1 trap, which was working effectively and causing trouble for
    the Heels.  The other was their zone defense, which held UNC without a
    field goal for a long stretch.  Trouble is, when OU plays zone it runs
    counter to the style of play they're trying to generate, (i.e. run and
    gun, uptempo.)  so even though it worked effectively Tubbs hardly used
    it at all in the 2nd half.  The fact that OU was almost always behind
    in the game (but only by a little) may have caused Billy to be
    reluctant to use the zone.  This was probably a mistake on his part. 
    
    The other defense that was working in the 1st half was solved by UNC in
    the 2nd by going into a 4-corners set.  King Rice played the middle of
    the floor and consistently split the OU defense to create 2 on 1
    scenarios.  This was particularly apparent late in the game, when we
    scored on 5 of our last 6 possessions, many coming against the 1-3-1.
    Bottom line is they played right into our hands with the man-to-man and
    1-3-1.  Better strategy would've been to stick with the zone until we
    made a few outside shots.  Carolina is not a very good outside shooting
    team.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
27.280AUSTIN::MACNEALBig MacMon Mar 19 1990 13:207
    Tubbs didn't make too many friends during his stay in Austin.  After
    the first round game he complained about the organization of the event
    (apparently the box score for the game was late), and the attendance
    (he claimed the Erwin Center was only half full for the start of the
    game and people were still filing in at half time which meant no big
    game atmosphere for most of the game).  Before the UNC game he blasted
    the media for picking on one of his players.
27.281COOKIE::MJOHNSTONBetter Living Through Chemicals!Mon Mar 19 1990 13:365
ACChris,

	Who the hell you callin` Monty?!?!?!?

Mike JN *;'D
27.282Yeah Chris, call him Mikey! :^0 GENRAL::WADEThat midnight train is whinin' low..Mon Mar 19 1990 13:391
    
27.283COMET::MONTGOMERYThe OAKLAND RAIDERS!!!!Mon Mar 19 1990 13:458
    
>    Anyway I think your analysis is right Monty.  

    Thank's ACC!!!!    
    
The_Real_Monty


27.284SASE::SZABOI'm a Titles man myself!Mon Mar 19 1990 13:484
    > The_Real_Monty
    
    Not to be confused with The_Real_Hoot!  :-)
    
27.285CX3COM::J_COTANCHWhere did the Big-8 go?Mon Mar 19 1990 14:2719
    The Big-8's performance (or lack of it) in the tourney shows that
    this conference is not quite on the same level as the Big-10, ACC,
    or the Big East in basketball.  IMO KU would have finished in the
    middle of the Big East.  Granted, they beat UNLV, St. John's, and
    LSU in the preseason NIT, but if KU would have played UNLV 1 or
    even 2 months ago, the Rebels would have won easily.  I'm not trying
    to downgrade the conference because I am a Big-8 fan, but I just
    think that the Big-10 and Big East are superior leagues from top
    to bottom.  If it wasn't for the big 3 (KU, MU, OU) the Big-8 never
    would have even been mentioned as one of the top conferences this year,
    and KSU probably wouldn't have made the tournament.
                                   
    The Big-8: Still a football conference, but getting better in
    basketball over the last few years, without a doubt.
    
    
    Joe
    
27.286(Blush) I goofed, plain and sample!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 19 1990 15:027
    I'm *SO* embarassed Mikey!  And to think, you were the foreman who got
    me aquitted!
    
    Embarassingly yours,
    
    - ACC Chris
    
27.287First non-arrogant stance Tubbs has taken all year...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 19 1990 16:1018
    
    Re. .280:
    
    Tubbs should keep his mouth shut when it comes to bragging about how
    many points his team will score, etc., but I thought he was justified
    in defending Skeeter Henry from the media attacks.  The media has 
    gotten a lot of mileage out of this stereotypical image of the 
    Sooners as a bunch of dumb JUCO recruits undeserving of college
    scholarship, and Henry, because of his on-the-court antics, has taken 
    the brunt of it this year.  I don't condone all of Henry's actions,
    but like with Dennis Rodman, I don't think his brand of enthusiasm
    should be removed from the game, either.  By his teammates' account, 
    Henry is a good guy to have around, excitability notwithstanding. 
    
    Skeeter did not impress versus North Carolina, though...
    
    glenn
    
27.289Some of us have to work for a living 8*(FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterMon Mar 19 1990 17:4622
    >  Where's Cowboy?
    
    >  You out there gaucho?  Remember when you chided me as being uptight
    >  cuz I "knew" that the Final Four was gonna be a_all Big8 affair?
    
    >  Haaa.
    
    I'm sitting right here!!!
    
    It's been difficult to monitor SPORTS today.  Someone told me to
    do some work or something!!  Enjoy it while you can, T because
    there are other sports going on now.  How 'bout wrestling and
    baseball?  HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
    
    See ya at the NCAA wrestling tournament?  no???
    How 'bout the College World Series then?  
    
    Couldn't help myself
    
    Cowboy
    
    
27.290COMET COMMENTSMAIL::MCNIELMon Mar 19 1990 20:0026
    Fellow Jayhawks and Big 8 fans,
    
    Admittedly so...
    
    KANSAS played at the same level of performance from game 1 to 
    game 30 this season.  And basically, everybody caught up with them
    (even some teams in the Big 8).  It's easy to be a rabid fan for 
    a team that was picked last in the league preseason and unranked
    nationally.  Let's face it, they played a back to the basic fun brand
    of ball!  You also had to be pulling for Minnesota, UCONN, and others
    that shook up there respective conferences as well.
    
    LOST THE BATTLE. WON THE WAR! 
    
    The Jayhawks successful season is a tribute to skilled coaching and
    extra effort from non-blue chip talent.  Sure, we LOST THE BATTLE... 
    a defeat in the tourney.  But, we WON THE WAR...The Kansas program is
    clean again!  And with Roy at the helm, it'll probably stay that way.
    Coach of the Year.  And, a class act.  
    
    
    As Roy would say "Dadgumit we lost".  I wonder what Billy would say?   
    
    
    Kansas Comet
    
27.291GENRAL::WADEThat midnight train is whinin' low..Tue Mar 20 1990 11:576
    re .290
    
    Billy would say, "I don't sound like Jack Nicholson...he sounds like
    me!"  ;^)
    
    Claybone
27.292Buffalo NewsCX3COM::J_COTANCHWhere did the Big-8 go?Tue Mar 20 1990 12:0413
    
    Football: CU moved their Sept. 8 game against Stanford to Sep. 6
              so it can be televised by ESPN.
    
    Basketball: Gary Colson is no longer in the running for CU's head
                coach in basketball, because he took the head coaching
                job at Fresno State.  The Buffs are also interested
                in Hawaii head coach Riley Wallace.  Other coaches on
                CU's potential list are Nolan Richardson (Arkansas)
                and Joe Harrington from Long Beach State.
    
    
    Joe
27.293FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Mar 21 1990 10:3011
    The last BIG-8 team bit the dust.  Oklahoma State lost to
    New Mexico in the NIT in the final seconds. (2nd round)
    
    New Mexico 90
    Oklahoma State 88
    
    
    On to Wrestling Finals and Baseball
    
    Cowboy
    
27.294**FOUR** BIG-8 teams in the top 20!!FTMUDG::REEDOklahoma State athletic supporterWed Mar 21 1990 10:4239
    National Wrestling Coaches Association Poll (3-20-90)
    
    				QUAL	PTS
     1. OKLAHOMA STATE (11)   	10	315
     2. Arizona State (5)	 9	309
     3. Iowa			 8	287
     4. NEBRASKA		 9	267
     5. Indiana			 8	244
     6. OKLAHOMA		 9	239
     7. IOWA STATE		 9	206
     8. Minnesota		 5	198
     9. Cal St.-Bakersfield	 8	197
    10. Northwestern 		 5	182
    11. Penn State		10	132
    12. Northern Iowa		 7 	121
    13. West Virginia		 8	119
    14.	North Carolina 		 6	101
    15. Navy			 6	 83
    16. Bloomsburg, Pa.		 6	 73
    17. Ohio State		 6	 71
    18. Wisconsin		 4	 42
    19. Michigan		 4 	 34
    20. Clarion 		 6	 31
    
    others:
    Oregon	25 (5)
    Maryland	23 (7)
    N. Car St	22 (8)
    Army	16 (3)
    Illinois	 7 (1)
    Lehigh	 7 (2)
    Lock Haven	 4 (5)
    Notre Dame	 3 (5)
    Clemson	 2 (6)
    
    
    Cowboy
    
    
27.295CAM::WAYO God of BattlesWed Mar 21 1990 11:349
Ah, these guys obviously don't know what they're talking about.

I didn't see Hulk Hogan U. or Ultimate WArrior School of Wrasslin'
anywhere in that list....

8^)
8^)

'Saw
27.296Keady to Colorado?FTMUDG::DUGGANWed Mar 21 1990 11:422
    Story in the Denver Post has Purdue's Gene Keady coming out to take
    over Colorado's basketball program.
27.297FTMUDG::REEDMember, Smegma Flickers AssociationFri Mar 23 1990 12:005
    The NCAA Wrestling Tournament has started.  Anyone have the
    team scoring after the 1ST Round?
    
    Cowboy (SFA)
    
27.298PNO::HEISERsave a tree, go CDFri Mar 23 1990 14:261
    doesn't matter, ASU will walk away with it again!
27.299FTMUDG::REEDMember, Smegma Flickers AssociationFri Mar 23 1990 15:4419
    But Oklahoma State has a shot at 2 Championships in a row.  I scanned
    the paper this morning and it looked like OSU won all of their 1st
    round matches but lost 1 in the preliminaries.  The BIG-8 as a group
    could have a good showing--unless they contract the same disease that
    their bball teams went down with.
    
    
    BIG-8 rankings going in:
     	(from memory--[my wife says that my memory is as short
    	as some parts of my anatomy--not sure what she's getting at]).
    
    #1 Oklahoma State
    #4 Nebraska
    #6 Oklahoma
    #7 Iowa State
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.300NCAA Wrestling Finals.....FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Mar 26 1990 11:1044
    Oklahoma State captured their 29th NCAA Wrestling Championship
    and their 2nd title in two years.  They had 2 individual 
    Champions.
    
    The BIG-8 takes 4 of the top 9 spots and 5 of the top 27.
    
    Final Team Scoring:
    
     1 OKLAHOMA STATE	117.75  ****
     2 Arizona State	104.75
     3 Iowa		102.75
     4 Northwestern	 66.75
     5 NEBRASKA		 64.25  ****
     6 Penn State	 57.50
     7 OKLAHOMA		 48.25  ****
     8 Indiana		 45.50
     9 IOWA STATE	 43.50  ****
    10 Minnesota	 42.25
    11 Northern Iowa	 40.50
    12 Cal St.-Bakersfld 30.50
    13 Navy		 29.
    14 Ohio State	 27.
    15 Clarion		 26.25
    16 North Carolina	 23.50
    17 Lehigh		 21.50
    18 West Virginia	 17.50
    19 Illinois		 15.
    20 Cornell		 14.
    21 (tie)
       Bloomsburg	 13.
       Stanford		 13.
       Wisconsin	 13.
    24 Cal St.-Fullerton 12.50
    25 New Mexico	 11.75
    26 William & Mary	 11.50
    27 MISSOURI		 11.     ****
    28 Syracuse		  9.50
    29 Clemson		  9.
    30 (tie)
       Morgan State	  8.50
       Oregon		  8.50
    
    
    Cowboy
27.301no more ladies....FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Mar 29 1990 11:0211
    According to today's Denver Post Oklahoma is canning their
    Women's Basketball program due to lack of support.
    
    
    
    
    You'd think that unsupported women running up and down the
    basketball court would draw crowds.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.302New B-Ball Coach at CUCX3COM::J_COTANCHWhere did the Big-8 go?Thu Mar 29 1990 15:127
    
    It was announced on the radio this morning that Joe Harrington has
    been hired as CU's new head basketball coach.  Good timing, with
    all the media in town for the Final Four.  Harrington was reportedly
    about to be hired on with the great University of Miami, otherwise
    known as college football's "Team of the 80's, storming into the
    90's!!"
27.303bball coaches switch jobsFTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Apr 03 1990 10:3712
    This was a real shocker and bad news for Oklahoma State:
    
    OSU Basketball coach Leonard Hamilton was hired by Miami, Fla.
    The reason he took the job was because of the great potential
    number of recruits in the area (not to mention the $$ ?)  He
    had done a great job recruiting players for OSU in the 4 years
    at OSU.
    
    Also, Kansas State hired Marshall bball coach.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.304possible women's bball lawsuit....FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 05 1990 11:4549
    
    		OU Threatened with a Lawsuit
    
    (AP) OKLAHOMA CITY--Saying he had "a slamm-dunk case" against the
    University of Oklahoma, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney demanded
    yesterday that the school reinstate its women's basketball program
    or face a federal lawsuit.
    
    	Arthur Bryant of Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, a public
    interest law firm, said last week's decision by school officials to
    eliminate the women's basketball program was in violation of the U.S.
    Constitution and federal law.
    
    	This decision is blatantly illegal," he said.  "This is a slam-dunk
    case.  It is a winner."
    
    	Bryant was the lead attorney in a successful sex discrimination
    lawsuit against Temple University that was settled in 1988.  he said he
    had been retained to represent members of the Oklahoma team.
    
    	He said he notified attorneys for the university that he would file
    the lawsuit today if officials did not rescind the action eliminating
    the women's program.
    
    	Bryant said the action violated the Title IX provision of federal
    law requiring equal opportunities for women in college athletics.
    
    	His comments came at a news conference attended by players,
    Oklahoma City attorney James Browne and Tim Stoner of the Women's
    Basketball Association.
    
    	Stoner said his organization would support Bryant's group in any
    action to reinstate the women's program at Oklahoma.
    
    	Officials at the university had not commented on the threatened
    lawsuit by late afternoon.
    
    	Bryant said he had been notified that Oklahoma officials would
    have a response this morning, either in a news conference or with a
    statement.  A spokesman for the university said late yesterday she
    could not confirm that.
    
    	Bryant said it is important that the matter be resolved quickly
    because Monday is the last day the Oklahoma players can accept
    scholarships at other schools.
    
    ------------------------------------
    Cowboy
    
27.305back to hoopsAUNTB::HAASsame as talking to youThu Apr 05 1990 12:134
OU is expected to announce the reinstatement of the women's basketball
program today. 

TTom
27.306where's the beef?FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 05 1990 12:1521
    > 	Bryant said the action violated the Title IX provision of federal
    > law requiring equal opportunities for women in college athletics.
    
    
    What's Title IX say?  And what is considered "equal opportunities"?
    
    Schools don't offer baseball for women but probably offer softball.  Is
    this considered "equal enough"?
    
    I've never heard of women's hockey teams in college (but we don't have
    hockey in the schools I've been around).  Where's the "equal opp" here?
    
    Same goes for football.  Do schools offer some phoney touch football
    league for the women?  (That could be a great co-ed sport).
    
    I don't see any *real* "equal opportunity" as sports is organized now.
    Any who takes the BLAM(tm) for this?  (I felt that should be added for
    the RCASOites(tm pending)).
    
    
    Cowboy
27.307Duck!!!USRCV1::COLOTTIRLisa,get away from that jazzmanThu Apr 05 1990 12:285
    I've heard of womens college hockey, but the newest one around
    here is womens lacrosse. Just imagine at po'd lady with a lacrosse
    stick in her hand!!8^
    				Rich
    
27.308FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 05 1990 12:388
    Does that mean that they also support a *men's* lacrosse team
    or does the women's lacrosse team exist to fill the female
    spot (no pen intended) created by men's football?
    
    All this "equal opportunity" is real unclear to me. EO should be
    upheld but what are the guidelines that the schools have to go by?
    
    Cowboy
27.309FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Apr 05 1990 12:4723
    I think footballl is exempt from the EEO guidelines because of its
    cost, size and the fact that no women (or so I've been told) play
    tackle football in college.  Except for football though everything
    else has to be equal.  And the schools are supposed to offer equal
    accomodations, equal travel and so forth, so if the men's basketball
    team flies to go on a road trip to Podunk U then the women's basketball
    team must also fly - they can't be sent by van or bus.  The women's
    basketball team must receive equity in hotel accomodations, meal
    money, support services (tutors, trainers, etc), equipment and so
    forth.
        
    For a sport like ice hockey, the school must also field a women's
    ice hockey team or the equivalent, ie, field hockey.  Men's lacrosse,
    women's lacrosse.  Men's soccer, women's soccer.  And so forth.
    I don't know how they handle sports like wrestling (or if was still
    an intercollegiate sport) boxing.  Now that I think about it, I
    don't know how OU expected to get away with eliminating women's
    hoops.  And as a side note, sports such as swimming, track and
    gymnastics are very often run as coed teams on the college level.
    High school too.
    
    John
    
27.310FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 05 1990 12:5510
    > I think footballl is exempt from the EEO guidelines because of its
    > cost, size and the fact that no women (or so I've been told) play
    > tackle football in college.
    
    My dad used to practice medicine in Tulsa and had the opportunity
    to be the team coach for a womens football team.  This was a short
    lived, semi-pro group.  He said that some of these gals were huge.
    I know I wouldn't want to tangle with'm.
    
    
27.311SHALOT::MEDVIDhe buys love to sell tomorrowThu Apr 05 1990 15:496
    > and the fact that no women (or so I've been told) play
    > tackle football in college.
    
    Yuh-huh!  Bernie Kosar played QB at Miami.
    
    	--dan'l
27.312FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 05 1990 16:072
    re:-1
    But he got his "start" playing on the women's lacrosse team in drag.
27.313Women win battleFTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Apr 06 1990 11:189
    OU, to avoid legal action, reinstated their Women's
    basketball program.  The budget is set at $300,000
    for the 13 to 15 players which is 1/4 the total
    women's athletic budget.
    
    Unfortunately, the reason for cutting the program
    will still exist.  No fan support.
    
    Cowboy
27.314Eddie Sutton--new coachFTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Apr 09 1990 11:369
    Eddie Sutton has been hired to take over head basketball coaching
    at Oklahoma State replacing Leonard Hamilton.
    
    Anyone know his background and why he was pressured to quit at
    Kentucky?  Is this guy likely to cause problems at OSU?
    
    Perspiring mimes what to, no?
    
    Cowboy
27.315I feel for ya Cowboy.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Apr 09 1990 12:1820
    > Anyone know his background and why he was pressured to quit at
    > Kentucky?
    
    Cause he's a low-down, shifty, unscrupulous, snake-bellied scoundrel,
    that's why.  His bald-faced lies on CBS when James Brown interviewed
    him (right before he got canned) saying he was innocent (hah!) rank 
    right up there with my all-time  "Make me wanna BARF" moments.  This
    guy is your worst used-car-salesman nightmare.  
    
    The fact that OSU could hire him given the stuff that went
    on at Kentucky is reason #1 why college athletics has the problems it
    does.
    
    Anything, repeat, ANYTHING, for some W's.
    
    (BTW - If you want a list of improprities that went on at Kentucky
     I'll be glad to provide some of 'em.  It's a long list though.  :^( )
    
    
    - ACC Chris
27.316Then why Sutton???FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Apr 09 1990 12:2411
    Was Hamilton his (Sutton) assistant?  Hamilton, imo, is a real
    quality person/coach.  If Sutton is as bad as you say then
    I caint imagine where the OSU athletic dept's brains are.
    
    As to winning at all costs, I love to win.  But its obviously
    not everything.  In all true, it would be ideal if every school
    took their turn at winning and so make competition even and more
    exciting.  Fat chance, eh?
    
    Cowboy
    
27.317OSU grad34180::HAASsame as talking to youMon Apr 09 1990 12:3513
I'm certainly not defending Eddie Sutton but he had none of these
problems at Arkansas (at least that I know about). At Kentucky, however,
he rewrote the book on violations yet some how was allowed to escape
essentially without punishment. The schools went on probation and he's
free to move to the next assignment.

Of course, his big connection to OSU is that he played there.

As to why they would consider him, consider this: in Kentucky there was a
ground swell of support for Sutton to run for US Senate. You figure it
out.

TTom
27.318FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Apr 09 1990 12:499
    I don't know why the NCAA doesn't require that all people that
    are involved be found either guilty or not-guilty.  Too many
    coaches ride off in the sunset with a cloud over their haids.
    The fans deserve to know their involvement as do the universities.
    
    Rich boosters need to be exposed too, when they spoil programs
    behind the schools' backs.
    
    Cowboy_striving_for_live_liberty_and_the_pursuit_of_busty_heart
27.319No sympathy. No compassion. (Sept for the OSU folks...)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Apr 09 1990 12:5415
    > had none of these problems at Arkansas (at least that I know about)
    					      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    There's the key TTom.  Just cause he didn't get caught before doesn't
    mean he wasn't committing some crimes.  Take a look at some of the top
    flight talent he lured to the Hogs, then take a look at Sutton's
    criminal mug, and it's not hard to come up with some purty interesting
    recruiting scenarios.
    
    Anyway even if we stretch our imagination and imagine Sutton being
    lilly-clean at Arkansas his activities at Kaintuck are still
    inexcusable.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
27.320EARRTH::BROOKSSucker that stole the soul ...Mon Apr 09 1990 14:368
    re .317
    
    Sutton was never really examined at Arkansas, but when Nolan Richardson
    took over, there was very littlew talent that was left there, and
    what was there was using drugs. He had to clean up a drug scandel
    at UA, and then restock the shelves so to speak ...              
    
    I believe that Eddie Sutton got out of Arkansas in the nick of time.
27.321COuld be why he wanted the job there4159::NAZZARODad's busy - 2 boys, 2 sports eachMon Apr 09 1990 16:053
    Isn't Sutton an OSU alum?
    
    NAZZ
27.322FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Apr 09 1990 16:104
    re: -1
    
    yes
    
27.323more bball coach newsFTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Apr 10 1990 11:0617
    Kansas State hired Jim Kerwin for assistant bball coach.
    
    
    Apparently OSU hasn't hired Sutton yet but will:
    
    From the Denver Post:
    
    	The university president will recommend to its regents
    a new basketball coach--reportedly Eddit Sutton--at a
    special meeting tomorrow.
    	University president John Campbell confirmed yesterday
    that he met with Sutton Saturday and said a four-year
    contract was being worked out.  But he stopped short of
    saying Sutton would be his sole recommendation.
    
    
    Cowboy
27.324CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes are #1....Again!Wed Apr 11 1990 16:242
    
    Miami likes those OSU coaches!!
27.325Sutton hiredFTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 12 1990 11:1219
    OSU officially hired Eddie Sutton yesterday.
    
    Sutton: "I always had a dream I might someday come back
    	to my alma mater....I've always thought of Oklahoma
    	as my home."  [That's understandable]
    
    The board of regents met for 90 minutes and voted 7-1
    to hire Sutton as the school's 16th bball coach.  The
    only dissenter said he had no problem with Sutton but
    felt the search process was not as thorough as it could
    have been.  Sutton had been the front-runner for the
    job.
    
    Sutton played for the Cowboys in the late 1950s.  He's
    54 and has a career record of 430-164 in 20 years of
    college coaching at Creighton, Arkansas and Kentucky.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.326GENRAL::GIBSONThu Apr 12 1990 13:425
    
    Should there be a contest as to when Okla. St. will get the death
    penalty? With their football improprieties coupled with Sutton taking
    over the b-ball program, they will be hard pressed to not get the death
    penalty.
27.327FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 12 1990 13:5813
    OSU's football program should be in good hands with Pat Jones
    as head coach.  That is, if boosters with $$$ can be kept
    from doing things behind the school's back.
    
    With Sutton's past problems (but not proven guilty, right?)
    I was shocked to hear that they even considered him.  I
    hope that he was just guilty of being in the wrong place
    at the wrong time.  The BIG-8 basketball competition is
    starting to get as tough as football so if he's the type
    to buy talent then it should show up right away.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.328GENRAL::GIBSONThu Apr 12 1990 18:267
    
    Cowboy,
    I was really surprised that a school that has had problems, probation
    for the football team, would hire a b-ball coach that has been just
    barely dodging the bullet for quite some time. Wasn't Sutton the guy
    who supposedly sent the bag of money that popped open at the wrong
    time?
27.329maybe he was "framed"FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 12 1990 18:4316
    I don't remember who it was HOOT.  I, too, can't believe that
    OSU's basketball program needs to take any chances in regards
    to NCAA problems.  Like the paper said, none of the regents
    nor the school pres had any problem with hiring Sutton which
    tells me that Sutton, by himself, shouldn't create problems
    at OSU.
    
    > Sutton played for the Cowboys in the late 1950s.  He's
    > 54 and has a career record of 430-164 in 20 years of
    > college coaching at Creighton, Arkansas and Kentucky.
    
    His w/l record *is* impressive, tho'.  Could be that that
    is what the regents really looked at, but surely they're
    smarter than that(?)
    
    Cowboy              
27.330suttong passed the bagAUNTB::HAASsame as talking to youFri Apr 13 1990 12:008
Sutton himself was slippery enough to have an assistant coach do the
actual sending. In fact, of all the harm to any one 2 guys got the
biggest shaft. A black player, Manuel (I think) who's permanently banned
from NCAA level 1 competition, and the assistant coach, also black.

Perhaps we need a little ABC scooping in this area.

TTom
27.331FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Apr 13 1990 12:228
    How bout if coachs' contracts had a clause stating that if the
    school ends up violating NCAA rules during the coach's reign,
    and the violations could have been avoided by the coach, then
    the coach owed the school the pay he received during the
    rules violation period.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.332CX3COM::J_COTANCHHurricanes are #1....Again!Fri Apr 13 1990 13:1014
    
    3 Buffs have been named to the Playboy preseason All-American team.
    They are linebacker Alfred Williams, punter Tom Rouen, and offensive
    tackle Mark VanderPoel.  The issue comes out in August.
    
    Big Eight scoring and rebounding leader Shaun Vandiver has announced
    that he will not enter the NBA draft, but will stay at CU for his senior
    season.  Vandiver had previously said that if head coach Tom Miller
    was fired he would leave CU.  
                                                  
    
    Joe
    
    J
27.333baseball score?FREMNT::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipWed Apr 25 1990 11:064
    anyone catch the Oklahoma State/Arkansas game last night on PSN?
    
    Cowboy
    
27.334FWIW DepartmentCX3COM::J_COTANCHMiami 27, Notre Dame 10Wed Apr 25 1990 15:216
    
    Kansas State is negotiating to play Oklahoma in a regular season 
    football game in Moscow next season or Northern Illinois in Italy 
    in 1991.
    
    Joe
27.335POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipWed Apr 25 1990 16:326
    It seems like two more evenly matched teams would be more
    exciting for the deprived soviet fans.  The money must be
    good for the two teams tho.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.336BIG-8 GOLF TourneyFREMNT::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 26 1990 11:0726
    		BIG-8 GOLF TOURNAMENT
    
    TEAM STANDINGS:
    1 Oklahoma State	284-272--556
    2 Oklahoma		290-293--583
    3 (tie) Colorado	304-292--596
    	    Kansas	298-298--596
    5 Nebraska		295-302--597
    6 Iowa State	293-309--602
    7 Missouri		301-304--605
    8 Kansas State	301-305--606
    
    INDIVIDUAL STANDINGS:
    Wentworth, OSU	70-65--135
    White, OSU		70-70--140
    Hainline, OSU	78-64--142
    Lee, OU		68-74--142
    Vuilllineo, KSU	71-71--142
    Thayer, KU		71-72--143
    Se Serrano, OSU	71-73--144
    Peterson, NU	72-72--144
    Bell, OU 		73-72--145
    May, OSU		73-73--146
    
    Cowboy
    
27.337Just wondering.GENRAL::GIBSONThu Apr 26 1990 14:218
    
    Hey Cowboy,
    What makes OSU a top golf school? They seem to always be lingering near
    the top, nationally. Are there allot of courses around there? Is it the
    coaches reputation or maybe some of the ex-student players?
    
                                                   HOOT
    
27.338POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 26 1990 15:2612
    > What makes OSU a top golf school? They seem to always be lingering near
    > the top, nationally. Are there allot of courses around there? Is it the
    > coaches reputation or maybe some of the ex-student players?
    
    HOOT, tradition must keep OSU at the top but there *are* plenty of
    golf courses (and highly rated) throughout the state with big-name
    players playing a lot of the courses.  It's a big sport in the state
    (even tho I don't follow it much).  The wealthy, country-club set from
    the oil-boom days probably should get credit for some of the growth of
    the game, too.
    
    Cowboy  
27.339CAM::WAYA fool's bolt is soon shotThu Apr 26 1990 15:393
I would also hazard a guess that the weather is pretty much conducive
to year round play, something that doesn't happen up here in the 
Northeast....
27.340POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Apr 26 1990 16:1311
    Yeah, there are idiots that'll swing clubs in lightening storms
    and during snow blizzards.   Actually, it's too hot/humid in
    the middle of a summer afternoon in Oklahoma to be chasing a
    golf ball.  The sun fries your skin and after a short time
    outside all your clothes get sweat-soaked.  Night golfing
    is popular in Tulsa for that reason.
    
    Give me Colorado's weather anytime!
    
    Cowboy
    
27.341CAM::WAYA fool's bolt is soon shotThu Apr 26 1990 16:245
Didn't realize the weather there was that bad. ;^)

Oh well, kinda blows another theory....

chainsaw
27.342on to an NCAA Championship....POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Apr 27 1990 11:2530
    FINAL RESULTS
    
    BIG-8 GOLF TOURNAMENT
    
    TEAM STANDINGS:
    1 Oklahoma State	284-272-293--849
    2 Oklahoma		290-293-297--880
    3 Colorado		304-292-291--887
    4 Iowa State	293-309-307--909
    5 Kansas		298-298-315--911
    6 Nebraska		295-302-317--914
    7 (tie) Missouri	301-305-314--920
         Kansas State	301-305-314--920
    
    
    TOP 10 INDIVIDUAL STANDINGS:
    
    Wentworth, OSU	70-65-76--211
    White, OSU		70-70-72--212
    Lee,OU		68-74-71--213
    DeSerrano, OSU	71-73-72--216
    Hainline, OSU	78-64-76--218
    Glaesel, CU		74-74-70--218
    May, OSU		73-73-73--219
    Thayer, KU		71-72-79--222
    Webb, ISU		75-74-74--223
    Vuillimon, KSU	71-71-81--223
    
    Cowboy
    
27.343OSU AD to retirePOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue May 01 1990 11:3620
    Oklahoma State's athletic director to retire and become
    president of the national Wrestling Hall of Fame.
    
    Denver Post. Myron Roderick announced yesterday he is resigning
    as Oklahoma State's athletic director since 1983, will become
    president of the national Wrestling Hall of Fame. [in Stillwater]
    His resignation is effective June 30.
    
    "It was a tough decision to make because I love Oklahoma State
    and love what I'm doing,"  Roderick said.
    
    Roderick was a 3-time NCAA wrestling champion at OSU.  He became
    coach of the Cowboys at age 22 and led them to 7 national
    championships in 13 years.  He was a co-founder of the U.S.
    Wrestling Federation spending 5 years as its executive director
    before returning to OSU as athletic director...
    
    
    Cowboy
    
27.344Buffs to play Miami!!!CX3COM::J_COTANCHIt's 3rd &amp; 43 for the 'Canes...Wed May 02 1990 12:045
    CU has announce that they will play a two-game series with America's
    premier college football team, the Miami Hurricanes.  They will
    play in Boulder in 1993 and in Miami in 1996. 
    
    Joe
27.345Cowboys' bats are still HOT!!!POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipSun Jun 03 1990 13:0017
    Oklahoma State won their 1st round game against Fullerton State
    in the CWS 14-4.
    
    In the 7th inning, OSU scored 7 runs with Neil Szeryk and
    Michael Daniel both hit homers to put FS away.  Daniel
    drove in 4 runs, 3 on an inside-the-park homer that sent
    FS left fielder Rich Gonzales to the hospital.  Gonzales
    collided with the left-field wall trying to catch Daniel's
    drive and was taken from the field in an ambulance.  He
    later was reported to be in good condition with no serious
    injuries.
    
    OSU had 18 hits, at least 1 from each starter and 4 apiece
    by Brad Beanblossom and Daniel.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.346USRCV1::COLOTTIRLittle Homer Simpson in all of usMon Jun 04 1990 11:259
    Saw the replay of Gonzales meeting with the wall. Boy was that scary.
    He held on to the ball but the umps had to give the Cowboys an inside-
    the-park HR cuz he made no attempt to remove the ball or show it to
    the ump. I think this rule needs to be re-evaluated. I imagine the 
    centerfielder could have gotten to the ball and and least held the
    guy to a triple. Just seems kind of unfair to penalize a team after
    such a gutsy play.
    				Rich
    
27.347One sore-haid....POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Jun 04 1990 11:4011
    It sounds like the problem was that the umps don't know whether
    to call it an out or not and with runners on base that need to
    know if they are supposed to tag up or go ahead and run the 
    bases.  It is too bad that that Gonzales made the painful effort
    for nothing.  If this play is going to be questionable in any
    way atleast it probably didn't decide the final outcome of the
    game.
    
    Hoping OSU beats LSU tonight.
    
    Cowboy
27.348SWC may merge with Big-8AUSTIN::MACNEALBo don't know rugby!Mon Jun 04 1990 12:273
    Rumors are flying that the SWC may merge with the Big-8.  These were
    sparked by the rumor that Arkansas may pull out of the SWC to join the
    SEC.
27.349no thanksPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Jun 04 1990 12:518
    That could be great with sports like baseball, golf, tennis,
    track, etc but how could other sports like football work?
    There aren't enough games played in the schedule for all
    the teams to play each other.  I'd rather keep the BIG-8
    the way it is.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.350alright!!!!!!!POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Jun 05 1990 11:3211
    Oklahoma State won their 2nd round game against LSU 7-1.
    
    Pitchers Brad Gore (1st 7-1/3 innings) and Ritchie Moody
    (relief) limited LSU to the lowest hit total in 7 years
    in a CWS game. (2 hitter)  Michael Daniel hit a 3-run
    homer.  Next game is Thursday against the winner in
    Weds game between The Citadel and LSU.
    
    They're still Hot!!!
    
    Cowboy
27.351tell me it ain't soPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Jun 05 1990 12:425
    Denver channel 7 reported last night that Colorado is
    under NCAA investivation for minor aligations.  The
    BIG-8 doesn't need any more of this!
    
    Cowboy
27.352POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Jun 05 1990 12:441
    re:-1  I need to add that this is rumor and denied by CU
27.353CAM::WAYBloomfield Brew CrewTue Jun 05 1990 13:101
NCAA :== Salem Witch Hunt
27.354OSU is still HOT!!!POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Jun 08 1990 11:1136
    Oklahoma State continued their CWS winning with a 2nd win over LSU,
    11-3.  Michael Daniel started a 6-run 6th inning with a home run
    and Brad Beanblossom capped it with a run-scoring single to send
    OSU into the Championship game.
    
    The big inning wiped out a 3-2 LSU lead and eliminated the Tigers
    from the series.
    
    Gordie Tipton (10-1) stopped LSU on 4 hits over 8 innings and
    struck out 7.  Tipton retired 15 straight batters after giving
    up 3 runs in the first 2 innings.  He has won all 7 of his
    starts since coach Gary Ward brought him out of the bullpen
    in late April.
    
    Bobby Carlsen drove in three runs and hit a CWS record-tying
    3 doubles to lead OSU's 19-hit assault against a record
    7 pitchers.
    
    In their 3 CWS, the Cowboys have scored 35 runs on 46 hits.
    
    
    
    * This will be OSU's 6th appearance in the title game
    
    * OSU won the national championship in 1959
    
    * OSU finished 2nd in 1961, 1966, 1981 and 1987
    
    * Only USC (12), Arizona St (9), and Texas (8) have made
      more championship game appearances than OSU.  Arizona
      also has played in 6 title games.
    
    
    One more game!!!
    
    Cowboy
27.355ncaa golf--2nd roundPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Jun 08 1990 13:5711
    Here's the team scoring of 2nd round of the NCAA golf tournament:
    
    1	Florida		287-283--570
    2	Arizona		288-285--573
    3	Georgia Tech	292-288--580
    4	Arizona St	296-288--584
    5	Florida St	293-293--586
    6	Oklahoma St	294-294--588
    tie	Clemson		289-299--588
    8	Oklahoma	290-300--590
    
27.356POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Jun 08 1990 14:0615
    Oklahoma State would have to pull out a miracle finish to
    win the golf championship this year.  I was hoping for 3
    NCAA championships this year.  They have a good shot for
    2 now.  Unfortunately, OSU has a habit of sucking wind
    when it comes down to the final CWS game.  In the past
    they won their games with hot bats and mediocre pitchers.
    It seems this year--atleast the end of the season--the
    bats have been ablazin' and pitching is really good.  During
    the CWS OSU pitchers have kept hits way down so far.
    
    I'll be watching the game in the car tomorrow while my
    wife drives us to Oklahoma for some time off. (Hope there's
    a close station at game time.)
    
    Cowboy
27.357GENRAL::GIBSONFri Jun 08 1990 15:173
    
    Cowboy,
    Got any individual scores?
27.358sorryPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Jun 08 1990 15:475
    That's about all the golf I saw in the Denver Post. It did say
    that Florida was looking good in individual scoring too.  This
    would be their 1st team championship, according to the Post.
    
    Cowboy
27.359NCAA Golf Final scoringPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Jun 18 1990 13:2823
    NCAA golf tournament:
    
    team scoring             2nd round 	Final
    
    1	Arizona St	292-288--584	1155
    2	Florida		287-283--570	1157
    3	Arizona		288-285--573	1159
    4	Oklahoma St	294-294--588	1163
    5	Oklahoma	290-300--590	1167
    tie	Fresno St	 ?   ?    ?	1167
    
    
    individual scoring		final
    
    1	Mickelson, ASU		279
    2	Miskell, Fresno St	283
    3	Karcher, Duke		284
    tie	Zerman, AU		284
    5	Lane, OU		286
    
    
    Cowboy
          
27.360POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Jun 18 1990 15:0825
    OSU's baseball coach, Gary Ward, is negociating his new contract.
    He's probably the BIG-8's lowest paid baseball coach at $46,000.
    The word is that he will take the $9,000 increase that was offered
    but will still leave him well below other coaches at other big
    baseball schools.  Texas Univ's coach gets $85,000).  Ward has
    had job offers from private businesses, minor leagues and other
    schools.  Supposedly, he wants to stay but the only thing that
    is holding up the signing is Ward wants guarantees that OSU will
    continue to support the baseball team enough to get back to the
    CWS.  That could be a problem because of sports revenue down
    from their football probation.  (OSU may have to cut back $250,000
    next year).
    
    Ward, 672-203 in 13 seasons at OSU, has made 8 trips to the CWS
    in the past 10 years, finishing 2nd 3 times, 3rd once and 4th once.
    
    
    New AD at OSU:
    
    Jim Garner has been hired to take over Myron Roderick's job (who is
    becoming the executive director of the National Wrestling Hall of
    Fame in Stillwater, OK).  Garner has a tough job to do with the
    downturn of sports income due to the football program.
    
    Cowboy 
27.361Golf Champs!UPWARD::HEISERMon Jun 18 1990 15:271
    A-S-U! A-S-U! A-S-U! A-S-U! A-S-U! A-S-U! 
27.362FREMNT::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Jun 18 1990 16:052
    Yeah, congratulations.  Florida must have blown a good 2nd round
    lead somehow.
27.363SWC/OU ???\POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipWed Jun 20 1990 11:4712
    Supposedly, the SWC is wanting to add Oklahoma U, but AD Donny Duncan
    hasn't heard from them yet.  He did say that he's not happy with the
    setup in the BIG-8 where schools that make the $$$ from TV, etc, has
    to share with the have-nots.  Can't BLAM him for that but then again
    that is one of the "securities" of belonging to a group.  I think
    that the almighty buck has grown to the point where its the *only*
    reason behind decisions now.  It would be refreshing to start hearing
    more about keeping old rivalries alive and allowing traditions to
    become actually *old* traditions.  
    
    Cowboy
                                     
27.364Ol' cowboysPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipSat Jun 23 1990 12:3031
    Rusty Hilger is now QBing for the Oklahoma City Twisters (Minor
    League Football System).
    
    Other ex-Oklahoma State recruits are:
    
    Ronnie Williams-TE, the QB that Mike Gundy replaced, had an
    incredible arm but no touch and turned receiver his senior year.
    I seriously doubt that there's a pro QB that has a better arm. I've
    seen Williams throw a *bullet* for 80 yards.  Unfortunately for the
    receivers he throws his screen passes with the same velocity.  These
    guys would need the ball surgically removed from their rib cages.
    
    Mitch Nash-RB, an over-looked RB with big league moves and
    strength.  Physically, he's a carbon copy of Thurman Thomas but
    had the bad luck of playing on the same team as him.  When
    Thomas graduated then came Barry Sanders.  Nash could make the
    big bucks if he gets a chance.
    
    Others: 
    
    Woody Pippins-FB
    Donnie Maloney-FB
    Willie Snead-WR
    Ben Rudolph-DL, 6 years with the Jets
    
    Head Coach:
    
    Darryl Rogers--Michigan State, Arizona State and Detroit
    
    
    Cowboy
27.365Bieniemy out for CU opener?CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UThu Jul 26 1990 15:5116
    
    I heard on CNN (I believe...) that Heisman candidate and CU star
    running back, Eric Bieniemy has been suspended for the season
    opener against Tennessee.  Has anyone else heard about this...?
    I think they said he was arrested for assaulting a fireman who
    came to put out the fire at his parents house?  Anyone in Colorado
    know more about this?  
    
    Also, you CU BuFF fans, any thoughts on the upcoming season?
    Tennessee is a very tough team...how do you think we will do
    without Bieniemy?  I know JJ Flanigan graduated because he was there
    while I was still at CU.  Do we have any great up and coming 
    tailbacks?
    
    
    Peace/ed (CU alum living in the Boston area--Cambridge, MA to be exact)
27.366GENRAL::WADEMamatruckstrainsprisonraingettin'drunkThu Jul 26 1990 16:1615
    Ed,
    
    	You've got the story correct.  He will practice with the team
    	but is banned from playing against Tennessee.  His first game
    	will be the home opener against Stanford.  
    
    	I don't know who his backup is.  
    
    	They will have a tough time with the Vols.  I believe they run
    	out of a *pro* set which gives a 5-2 defense fits.
    
    	I believe they will be just as good as last year.  Whether or
    	not that's good enough to win the Big 8 is a good question...
    
    	Claybone
27.367JURAN::MCKAYThu Jul 26 1990 20:215
    I also heard (sportscenter possibly) that Bieniemy also gave
    the police a false name, but I don't know what the charge for
    that was.
    
    Jimbo
27.368Where has "Character" gone ???BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Jul 27 1990 14:559
    re: .363
    
    Right on Cowboy !!!
    
    
    Nebraska Marty
    
    (Oh, and you guys thought maybee I went away and crawled under a rock
     or something.  ;^)  )
27.369Nebraska Football Schedules 1990 - 1996BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Jul 27 1990 15:1481
         1990 Nebraska Huskers Football Schedule

Sept.  8    No. Illinois     Oct.  20    Oklahoma State
Sept. 15    Baylor           Oct.  27   @Iowa State
Sept. 22    Minnesota        Nov.   3    Colorado (Revenge !!!)
Sept. 29    Oregon State     Nov.  10   @Kansas
Oct.   6   @Kansas State     Nov.  17   @Oklahoma
Oct.  13    Missouri         Jan.   1    Orange Bowl

                         1991

		Sep. 7	Utah State - HOME
		     14 Colorado State
		     21 Washington - HOME
		     28 Arizona State
		Oct. 12 Oklahoma State
		     19 Kansas State - HOME
		     26 Missouri
		Nov.  2 Colorado
		      9 Kansas - HOME
		     16 Iowa State
		     23 Oklahoma - HOME
				
                         1992
	
		Sep.  5 Utah - HOME
		     12 Temple - HOME
		     19 Washington
		     26 Arizona State - HOME
		Oct. 10 Oklahoma State - HOME
		     17 Kansas State
		     24 Missouri - HOME
		     31 Colorado - HOME
		Nov.  7 Kansas
		     14 Iowa State - HOME
		     21 Oklahoma		
		
                         1993
	
		Sep.  4 Wyoming - HOME
		     11 Texas Tech - HOME
		     18 UCLA
		     25 Colorado State - HOME
		Oct.  9 Oklahoma State
		     16 Kansas State - HOME
		     23 Missouri
		     30 Colorado
		Nov.  6 Kansas - HOME
		     13 Iowa State
		     20 Oklahoma - HOME	

                         1994
	
		Sep.  3 Wyoming - HOME
		     10 Texas Tech
		     17 UCLA - HOME
		     24 Utah State - HOME
		Oct.  8 Oklahoma State - HOME
		     15 Kansas State
		     22 Missouri - HOME
		     29 Colorado - HOME
		Nov.  5 Kansas
		     12 Iowa State - HOME
		     19 Oklahoma
		
                         1995*
	
		Sep.  9 Michigan State
		     16 Arizona State - HOME
		     23 Utah State - HOME
		     30 Washington State - HOME
		
		
                         1996*

		Sep.  7 Nevada-Las Vegas - HOME
		     14 Michigan State - HOME
		     21 Arizona State
		     28 Colorado State - HOME

* 1995 and 1996 Big Eight Schedules still to be determined
27.370It's rediculous...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Jul 27 1990 15:177
    re: -1
    
    I know, I know, man is it ever a whimpy schedule. Just like last year.
    I dont like it either. I dont schedule em, I just root for the team.
    Gets a little better in comming years, but still not great.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.371FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOSSteak n' Potatoes ManFri Jul 27 1990 15:342
    Marty, any idea which games are going to be nationally televised this
    year ?  I'm a Big Red fan too.
27.372I have no Official word...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Jul 27 1990 15:4114
    re: -1
    
    Go Big Red !!!  I would be supprised to see anything televised but
    the Colorado game. If Okie State has a good year that one may be on
    ESPN or something. The Baylor, Minnesota games are extremely remote
    chances. I think Oklahoma is still on TV suspension arent they?
    
    Used to be Nebraska got TV games because they are Nebraska. And they
    used to have a tougher schedule. Because of the schedule the last
    few years and the beating they took in the bowl, they wont get any
    games on TV JUST because they are Nebraska this year. Huskers did not
    finish top-10 last year for the first time in some 20 years.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.373Is it too late for new tricks ?FSHQA1::JRODOPOULOSSteak n' Potatoes ManMon Jul 30 1990 14:025
    Will Osborne ever get away from the wishbone and start playing more of
    the proset offence, much like Miami ?  They seem to have trouble with
    such teams, and in reality the wishbone is a thing of the past.  the
    pro-set offence would also help the Neb. players who want to catch on
    with pro teams.
27.374NU never has used the wishbone, at least regularlyWORDS::NISKALAIntercourse the penguin!Tue Jul 31 1990 13:463
    	Osborne doesn't use the wishbone, ala, OSU, OU. He runs a straight
    power I formation, primarily using the deep back following the
    fullback. They do run quite a few QB options out of the formation, too.
27.375Modernize at Nebraska ???BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Jul 31 1990 14:0925
    re: -1
    
    Well lets hope so. Nebraska has run variations of the power I for many
    years. When the Huskers won back-to-back national championships in 70,
    71 Osborne was the Offensive coordinator with Bob Devany as head coach.
    
    Osborne has run pretty much the same offense since then. It's a good
    offense but to keep up with the times he has to pass more from it. It
    is a good set to pass from. He just needs to call more pass plays, pass
    more to the backs and wide recievers and less to the tight ends. As
    it stands now, everybody and their brother knows whats comming. A
    strong team can stop it. The Missouri's and Kansas States of the world
    cant. I dont think Nebraska's problems have been from lack of talent.
    
    Throw 30 passes a game mixed with their rushing game and it could be
    an awsome combination. Osborne has good athletes to work with also.
    I have no idea if the FSU game woke Dr. Tom up or not. I know that
    McCartney at CU is going to concentrate on the pass more. Lets hope
    Nebraska follows the trend.
    
    I have no word out of Lincoln. Living in Colorado Springs I dont get
    much media news out of Omaha. The guys in field service in Omaha are
    never in notes (Node Husker !!!) so I dont get much news their either.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.376no wishbone here eitherPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Jul 31 1990 14:335
    >	Osborne doesn't use the wishbone, ala, OSU, OU. He runs a straight
    
    OSU doesn't use the wishbone either.  They use the I formation.
    
    Cowboy
27.37729, Really, WOWBSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Jul 31 1990 15:0612
    re: My note a few back.
    
    It should be "re: -2" I did not realize Keith added a node just before
    me.
    
    re: -1 personal name
    
    Hey Cowboy, has Okie State won 29 NCAA national wrestling
    championships? If so * THAT * is awesome !!! If they have gotten 29,
    then how many has Iowa and Iowa State had???
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.378Yeah, OSUs wrassln' foolzPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Jul 31 1990 16:0514
    Yeah, they won the NCAA the last two years.   Hopefully, OSU
    will continue their comeback.  They've been slacking off for
    a few years.  BTW, the National Wrestling Hall of Fame is in
    Stillwater, although I've never been in it.  It's always
    closed when I'm in town.  Supposedly, my wrestling coach from
    years back is mentioned there.  His name is Merle Jennings.
    His twin brother, Berle and him were both 3 or 4 times NCAA
    wrestling champs back in the '40s.  I don't remember what
    school they wrestled for tho.
    
    Sorry, I have no idea how many championships any schools have
    (other than OSU of course).
    
    Cowboy
27.379Sooner woes continue.CSC32::GL_JOHNSONMo' Better BluesThu Aug 02 1990 19:2411
    
    	AP reported this morning that OU RB Mike Gaddis has not recovered
    from a knee injury suffered last season and will miss the entire
    1990 season.  He will only have one year of eligibility left if he 
    is able to fully recover.  The injury is similar to that suffered 
    by former Penn State RB Blair Thomas, however OU coach Gary Gibbs
    and team doctors have determined that Gaddis is 'not nearly where
    he needs to be.'
    
    						 glen j.
    
27.380Deep in Talent...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Fri Aug 03 1990 16:205
re: -1

I bet they got 3 others just about as good ready to go.

Nebraska Marty
27.381OU loss - Oct. 27th @BoulderCSC32::GL_JOHNSONMo' Better BluesFri Aug 03 1990 18:265
>I bet they got 3 others just about as good ready to go.
    
    	Won't make any difference.  
    
                                        	 glen j. 
27.382Snowden is Bienemy's BackupDENVER::HITEMon Aug 06 1990 13:2324
    Regarding .365/.366 - I have heard that a red-shirt freshman named
    Snowden is Bienemy's backup.
    
    The story I have heard is that there was a fire at the brand new home
    of Eric's mother.  After the flames had been put out, a fireman took an
    axe and started knocking a hole in one of the walls.  Eric thought that
    the fire was out and that it was unnecessary to knock a hole in the
    wall, so he jumped the fireman.  Eric's outburst was wrong, but it was
    due to his concern for his mom's new home.
    
    McCartney's decision was unpopular with many here in Colorado.  I feel
    the coach's decision was a prudent one.  Eric has an incredible future
    waiting for him on the horizon.  But he needs to control his "hot
    head" and the coach's decision to bench him for the UT game will help
    reinforce that.
    
    I still think CU will win the game, but I am relieved that the game is
    being played on a neutral field.  I have been to games at Neyland
    Stadium in Knoxville.  96,000 wild Vol fans!
    
    My husband is a grad of UT and I am a CU alum.  I could have lived my
    whole life without these two teams every having to play!!!!!  But no!!!
    
    Jan
27.383Go BuFFs!CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UMon Aug 06 1990 14:5311
    
    I just saw Colorado's non-conference football schedule...
    They play Tennessee, Stanford, Illinois, Texas and Washington.
    Wow, pretty impressive....Tennessee and Illinois are legitimate
    top ten teams, Washington is top-twenty and Stanford and Texas 
    aren't slouches either.  If Colorado can be 5-0 at this point,
    then another run at the national championship is not outta
    the question.  All they have to do is beat Nebraska at
    Lincoln, which of course we know they will...
    
    Peace/ed
27.384All Coaches Should Do This...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Mon Aug 06 1990 14:548
McCartney seems to be a fair and prudent man. My guess is that he
has a team rule about this and he makes it consistant accross the
board. Young college football types need this type of discipline.

Good choice by McCartney. Other coaches would benefit by this type
of coaching.

Nebraska Marty
27.385Would you buy a car from this man?POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Aug 06 1990 14:575
    I was in Oklahoma City saturday night and saw that Barry Switzer
    was still around doing commercials for a local car dealership.
    He must have more credibility in Oklahoma than I thought.  
    
    Cowboy
27.386He put himself on the linePOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Aug 06 1990 15:0212
> McCartney seems to be a fair and prudent man. My guess is that he
> has a team rule about this and he makes it consistant accross the
> board. Young college football types need this type of discipline.
    
    He just signed a multi-year contract that *HE* asked to contain
    a clause that said something like if he didn't punish every
    player that got arrested then he (coach Mac) would be fired.
    
    Anyone remember more about what the wording REALLY said?
    
    Cowboy
    
27.387Pride Goeth Before the Fall, I Know...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Tue Aug 07 1990 12:4823
re: .381,383

>>I bet they got 3 others just about as good ready to go.
    
>    	Won't make any difference.  
    
>                                        	 glen j. 


>                     ...If Colorado can be 5-0 at this point,
>    then another run at the national championship is not outta
>    the question.  All they have to do is beat Nebraska at
>    Lincoln, which of course we know they will...
    
>    Peace/ed


Now, now young men. Such arrogance before the season has even started...
Geez, I don't know...

Only time will tell.

Nebraska Marty
27.388CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackTue Aug 07 1990 14:2218
    I seriously doubt it if OU has 3 others as good as Gaddis ready
    to go, but they do have some good ones.  Gaddis was fantastic before
    his injury.
    
    Bienemy's replacement for the UT game will probably be 3rd year
    sophomore Matt Bell.  It is a good thing the UT game is not in
    Knoxville.  Let's hope ND gets their tails kicked later in the year
    when they visit Volunteer country.  CU's non-conference schedule
    is very tough; one poll (I think it was Lindy's) had the Huskies
    ranked 5th nationally.
    
    Is NU any closer to picking a starting QB?  Last I heard Mickey
    Joseph had a very slight edge over the other QB, whose name I can't
    recall.  I was reading that NU is only returning 2 starters on offense,
    but Osborne doesn't seem to be too concerned.
    
    Joe
       
27.389Hard to get NU news in Colorado...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Tue Aug 07 1990 18:4028
re: -1

>    Is NU any closer to picking a starting QB?  Last I heard Mickey
>    Joseph had a very slight edge over the other QB, whose name I can't
>    recall.  I was reading that NU is only returning 2 starters on offense,
>    but Osborne doesn't seem to be too concerned.

The other guys last name is Grant I think. Mickey Joseph was very highly
touted out of high school. Grant wasent considered a blue-chipper but has
come on strong.

The guys I talked to back in Omaha say they have heard nothing about who
will be starting. I will say that Osborne usually waits until the week
before the first game to announce it.

Only 2 starters returning on offense is why many of the football magazines
are picking Nebraska in the top 20 but not top 10. However, the Huskers
normally only have 4 to 6 returning starters on offense due to their 5
year program. Many of Nebraska's starters year after year are 5th year
redshirt seniors. It's not unusual for a NU kid to start only 1 year in
his college career at Nebraska. I also heard that Osborne is not concerned.

Hopefully to counter that is the fact that they have many defensive 
starters returning. Plus the fact that they have a pud schedule and can
get some starting experience into the offense before they play anyone
halfway decent. There are good and bad things about that though.

Nebraska Marty
27.390CU/ND rematch...CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UTue Aug 07 1990 19:0112
    
    I hope that Notre Dame goes undefeated (yes, I know that means 
    beating Miami at South Bend) and Colorado goes undefeated so
    we can have a rematch in the Orange Bowl--because I think this time
    Colorado would kick Notre Dame's butt...and Lou Holtz by the third
    quarter would be "grab-bagging...."
    
    If Miami beats Notre Dame...I don't know...playing Miami in the Orange
    Bowl on New Year's Day is like playing the Roadrunner when your name
    is Wile E. Coyote...
    
    Peace/ed
27.391Oct. 20th: Hide the Women & Children!CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackTue Aug 07 1990 19:238
    The Miami-ND clash is definitely college football's game of the
    year.  It is also the last game between the 2 schools in the series
    because ND is dropping Miami, but we won't get into that.  I'll
    go on record now as saying that Miami will win fairly easy again.
    Remember the date: October 20th.
    GO 'Canes!!!
    
    Joe
27.392Big-8 Football Schedule ???HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Mon Aug 13 1990 17:364
Note .369 has the Nebraska football schedule. Does anyone have the
complete Big-8 schedule?

Nebraska Marty
27.393CAM::WAYTake FiveMon Aug 13 1990 18:18115
There might be some typos, but I think this is it...


Colorado
--------
8-26   Tennessee
9-8    Stanford
9-15   @ Illinois
9-22   @ Texas
9-29   Washington
10-6   @ Missouri
10-13  Iowa St
10-20  @ Kansas
10-27  Oklahoma
11-3   @ Nebraska
11-10  Oklahoma St
11-17  Kansas St

Nebraska
--------
9-1    Baylor
9-8    No. Illinois
9-22   Minnesota
9-29   Oregon St
10-6   @ Kansas State
10-13  Missouri
10-20  Oklahoma St
10-27  @ Iowa St
11-3   Colorado
11-10  @ Kansas
11-17  @ Oklahoma

Oklahoma St
-----------
9-8    Tulsa
9-15   No. Iowa
9-22   @ TCU
10-6   Oklahoma
10-13  @ Kansas St
10-20  @ Nebraska
10-27  Missouri
11-3   Kansas
11-10  Colorado
11-17  @ Iowa St

Oklahoma
--------
9-8    @ UCLA
9-15   Pittsburgh
9-22   Tulsa
9-29   Kansas
10-6   Oklahoma St
10-13  @ Texas
10-20  Iowa St
10-27  @ Colorado
11-3   @ Missouri
11-10  Kansas St
11-17  Nebraska

Iowa St
-------
9-8    No. Illinois
9-15   @ MInnesota
9-22   @ Iowa
9-29   West. Michigan
10-6   Kansas
10-13  @ Colorado
10-20  @ Oklahoma
10-27  Nebraska
11-3   @ Kansas St
11-10  Missouri
11-17  Oklahoma St

Kansas
------
9-1    Virginia
9-8    Oregon St
9-15   @ Louisville
9-29   @ Oklahoma
10-6   @ Iowa St
10-13  @ Miami
10-20  Colorado
10-27  Kansas St
11-3   @ Oklahoma St
11-10  Nebraska
11-17  Missouri

Kansas St
---------
9-8    West. Illinois
9-15   New Mexico St
9-22   @ No. Illinois
9-29   New Mexico
10-6   Nebraska
10-13  Oklahoma St
10-20  @ Missouri
10-27  @ Kansas
11-3   Iowa St
11-10  @ Oklahoma
11-17  @ Colorado

Missouri
--------
9-8    TCU
9-15   Utah St
9-22   @ Indianna
9-29   Arizona St
10-6   Colorado
10-13  @ Nebraska
10-20  Kansas St
10-27  Oklahoma St
11-3   Oklahoma
11-10  @ Iowa St
11-17  @ Kansas 

27.395CAM::WAYTake FiveMon Aug 13 1990 18:306
HA! Stevie Boy, beat ya to it... (and mine even had dates!)

'Saw


PS Don't mind me, it's monday.....
27.396HuskerCamp Notes...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Tue Aug 14 1990 12:3110
A little Husker news from Omaha.

Terry Rodgers (Nebraska Heisman winner Johnny Rodgers Son) reinjured his
knee which was recovering from surgury. Osborne said he is concerned.

Wingback Nate Turner is hurt also. A leg problem, not a knee though.

No news on the QB thing.

Nebraska Marty
27.397HuskerCamp NotesHUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Wed Aug 15 1990 12:2911
I got some more news from the boys in Omaha Field Service:

	Got some more huskers news. T.O. says that Grant and
	Joseph are dead even for first team QB. Also expect an 
	anouncement regarding Terry Rogers. Just another trivial 
	tid bit. T.O. said that if the Huskers ever did have a couple
	of bad seasons he did'nt know if it would be worth staying
	because of all the flack.


Nebraska Marty
27.398POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipWed Aug 15 1990 17:163
    RE: -1
    
    Does it sound like T.O. is getting tired of his job?
27.399Baylor/NU game on TV !!!HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Wed Aug 15 1990 19:0316
More Husker news from Omaha Field Service:

	The Baylor game originally scheuled for Sept 15th has been moved
	to a Sept 1st night game and will be on ESPN. ALRIGHT !!!!!!!!

	For any noters who live in the Colorado Springs area - I'm havin
	a GO BIG RED HUSKER PARTY !!!! YEEAAAAAAAAAA !!!

	Wingback Nate Turner is out for 6 weeks with a broken colar bone
	I think. They are moving a 6'4" 240 lb Freshman to 3rd string
	wingback.

	Loetis Flowers is now 1st string halfback but word is he will be
	severly challenged by Scott Baldwin.

Nebraska Marty
27.400CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackWed Aug 15 1990 19:208
    Hard to believe that Flowers is being challenged at I-Back.  It
    sounded like he was going to be their main man after finishing with
    a 7.5 yard average last year.  Of NU's top 3 rushers from last year,
    Flowers is the only one left - the others being Gdowski and Clark.
    Any news on how Terry Rodgers is recovering from the injury a couple
    years ago?
    
    Joe
27.401NU schedule is PUDENVER::TOMPKINSWed Aug 15 1990 22:018
    I don't usually thrown stones at schedules...but I heard Nebraska tried
    to squeeze the Boys Town Tech in, but refused to play them away from
    Lincoln. What happened to the Huskers I used to respect.....you
    know..with a championship schedule.  Come on NU fans...don't stand for
    this insult of a schedule.  
    
    What is the strategy....point to two games, CU and OU, and surround
    them with cream puffs.  Jeepers!!!!!
27.402Nebraska to Big 1x?33945::HAASsame as talking to youThu Aug 16 1990 09:248
Any comment from the Big 8 troops on Nebraska going to the Big 10 or Big
11 or whatever it's called today? USA Today has an article on all the
movement and it projects Nebraska to the Big 10.

In fact, it labels the Big 8 as a possible loser in the shuffle with what
they call 'no natural way to go' in terms of expansion.

TTom
27.403MCIS1::DHAMELIs Nothing Sacred?Thu Aug 16 1990 12:336
    
    Loetis Flowers?  Tell me this guy wasn't either born at Woodstock
    or raised on a commune with Dweezle Zappa and Moon Unit.
    
    Dickster
    
27.404He's from Corn CountryHUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Thu Aug 16 1990 12:3744
    re: -1
    
    Flowers is from Omaha, Nebraska. Went to high school at Omaha Central.
    
    re: few back
    
    I just read the article in USA Today. Looks to me like an article based on
some fact with a huge amount of speculation thrown in. This is the first I
have heard of the Husker/Big-10 thing.

Here are the articles statements about Nebraska:

	Nebraska is, or should be, off to the finacially more lucrative Big
	Ten. But the Huskers repelled that league's advances late last 
	month. But maybe the Big Ten people will count heads in Lincoln, NE
	and realize that the Kansas City and St. Louis that Missouri has 
	makes more sense.

	But already signs have started that Nebraska is rethinking about 
	flirting with the Big Ten. Two school administratiors said last 
	week the Big Ten had a certain appeal.

Their speculation of conference make up:

	Big-10			Big-8

	Nebraska		Iowa State
	Iowa			Missouri
	Michigan		Kansas State
	Pen State		Kansas
	Ohio State		Oklahoma State
	Illinois		Oklahoma
	Michigan State		North Texas
	Minnesota		TCU
	Northwestern		SMU
	Wisconsin		Baylor
	Purdue			Houston
	Indiana			Rice

They are placing Colorado and BYU in the Pac-10

Wierd stuff. Lots of speculation based on SOME fact.

Nebraska Marty
27.405LAGUNA::MAY_BRThu Aug 16 1990 13:578
    
    Word here is that if Texas, Colorado, BYU, and Texas A&M joined the PAC
    10 they'd have 25% of the US television market.  The problem is that
    with the increased revenue from certain sports (football, basketball)
    they'd also have significant increases in the travel expenses for the
    less popular sports.
    
    Bruce   
27.406HOW DEEP IS THE OFFENSIVE LINE?CSC32::LATOURSat Aug 18 1990 19:169
    
    Does anyone have any word on the Buffs offensive line and how deep
    is it? 
    
    
    
    Drewski
    
    
27.407CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Sat Aug 18 1990 19:242
    
    
27.408Devastating OLCX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackMon Aug 20 1990 11:5316
    RE -2
    
    CU lost 2 players from last year's offensive line, guard Darrin
    Muilenburg and tackle Bill Coleman, but the returning 3 are strong all-Big
    8 candidates.  Joe Garten, an All-American last year, returns at
    left guard, Jay Leeuwenburg returns at center and Mark Vander Poel,
    a 6-8 305 pounder, returns at right tackle.  The projected starter
    at left tackle is Ariel Solomon, a 6-6 275 lb. senior, and at right
    guard it is Russ Heasley, a 6-4 265 lb. junior.  Garten is a 6-3
    280 lb. senior and Leeuwenburg is a 6-3 265 lb. junior.  The Buffs'
    starting offensive line is rumored to be 2nd best in the nation
    behind Michigan's.  One of McCartney's main concerns on this team
    is depth on the offensive line, so let's hope the starting 5 stay
    healthy.
                                  
    Joe
27.409CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackMon Aug 20 1990 11:5931
    UPI Preseason Poll (1st place votes in parentheses)
    
    1. Miami (25)
    2. Notre Dame (15)
    3. Florida State (8)
    4. Auburn (8)
    5. Colorado (2)
    6. USC
    7. Michigan
    8. Nebraska
    9. Tennessee
    10. Clemson
    11. Texas A&M
    12. Illinois
    13. Ohio State
    14. BYU
    15. Arkansas
    16. Washington
    17. Alabama
    18. Penn State
    19. UCLA
    20. Pitt
    21. Virginia
    22. Michigan State
    23. Arizona
    24. Syracuse (tie)
        Texas         
    
    The Sooners are not ranked because UPI doesn't rank teams on probation.
    
    Joe
27.410Buff Scouting ReportCX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackTue Aug 21 1990 16:4950
    This year's Buffalo squad returns 8 All-American candidates, led
    by junior QB Darian Hagan, one of the preseason Heisman favorites.
    The others returning are OG Joe Garten, OT Mark Vander Poel, TB
    Eric Bienemy, NT Joel Steed, OLB's Kanavis Mcghee and Alfred Williams
    and punter Tom Rouen.  Overall, CU returns 6 starters of offense
    and 7 on defense.
    
    Bienemy has been suspended for the first game against Tennessee
    and Michael Simmons has been named as the starter at tailback for
    that game.  Mike Pritchard will start at wingback against the Vols,
    but will be move to wide receiver after this game, a move he made
    in the spring.  McCartney says the Buffs will be passing more this
    year, mainly because they need to be less predictable against stronger
    opponents.  Hagan averaged less than 8 passes per game last year,
    although he left a few games at halftime because the Buffs had big
    leads.  The offensive line returns 3 starters and is one of the nation's
    best.  In addition to Garten and Vander Poel, center Jay Leeuwenburg
    also returns, and one preseason publication had all 3 of them on
    its all Big-8 team.  McCartney said that David Arterberry and Chuck
    Snowden may also see some time at tailback against Tennessee.
                               
    On defense, the Buffs will be very dominant, led by the bookends,
    outside linebackers Kanavis McGhee and Alfred Williams.  On the
    inside, the starters will be Greg Biekert and Chad Brown, who was
    a starter at the end of last season.  Terry Johnson, who was one
    of the inside 'backers last year, has lost his starting job.  Only
    nose tackle Joel Steed returns on the defensive line, but Garry
    Howe, who will start at one end, played more than Okland Salavea
    in the final weeks of last season.  The other starter on the line
    will be redshirt freshman Leonard Renfro.  In the secondary, Deon
    Figures has been named the starter over David Gibbs at one cornerback
    spot.  Figures was a starter 2 years ago, but was suspended last
    season.  Also returning in the defensive backfield are cornerback
    Dave McCloughan and strong safety Tim James.  
    
    Jim Harper, a juco transfer, will replace the departed Ken Culbertson
    at placekicker.
    
    Outlook: On paper, CU has a better, more experienced team than last
    year, but they may not go undefeated again because the schedule
    is tougher.  The Buffs play on the road against Texas, Illinois,
    and Nebraska, 3 teams which they got at home last year.  Plus they
    play Tennessee in the inagural Pigskin Classic.  Also, Washington
    and Oklahoma are both expected to be better this season.  Eric Bienemy
    is expected to return to the starting lineup for the Sept. 6th home
    opener against Stanford.  That game is slated for 6pm(MDT) on ESPN.
    
    
    Joe
27.411CU/TennesseeCURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UThu Aug 23 1990 16:3818
    
    
    I just saw that Colorado is a 5 point favorite over Tennessee
    for this Sunday's college football opener.  Any opinions on
    this?  I think this is a bit on the high side.  Tennessee is
    a good team and this is being played on a neutral field and
    CU won't be playing their star running back--Eric Bieniemy.
    I think last year CU finished 4th and Tennessee finished 5th
    in the final AP poll.  I think maybe CU favored by 1 or 2 would
    be more appropriate.
    
    However if I do have to make a prediction, I would say:
    
    Colorado   31
    Tennessee  27
    
    
    Peace/ed
27.412GO VOLSRAVEN1::D_SMITHFri Aug 24 1990 09:537
    
    Tennessee by 11,Chuck Webb to get over 150 yards to win MVP of game.
    
    
    
    d.s.
    
27.413Vols are Awesome!CGVAX2::REEVEFri Aug 24 1990 12:521
    UT by 20.
27.414RSST6::RIGGENBurley from bikingFri Aug 24 1990 12:576
CU is serious about this game. McCartney is showering UT with complements on 
the Offensive side of the ball. 

I expect a CU 42 UT 10. 

Kanavis McGee 4 sacks
27.415CX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackFri Aug 24 1990 13:2512
    UT's offense is as strong as CU's if not better with Chuck Webb
    returning, but the Vols have some problems on the defensive side of
    the ball.  Last year they were dead last in the SEC in passing defense.
    With that in mind, I expect Hagan to pass about 15-20 times Sunday.
    The Buffs will start off the season on a good note.
    
    CU 38
    UT 20
    
    Joe
    
    
27.416Smart money is on CUJURAN::MCKAYFri Aug 24 1990 14:015
    If you were to wager on this game give up the points, UT will
    not score many points in this game.
    
    Take it to the bank 
    Jimbo
27.417GO BIG ORANGERAVEN1::D_SMITHFri Aug 24 1990 15:1810
27.418U.T. 31 AND C.U. 31 RAVEN1::M_PHILLIPSU CANT TOUCH THISMon Aug 27 1990 04:375
    
    
      
    
    
27.419Good Game...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Mon Aug 27 1990 13:3324
This game was too early. Both teams sloppy. 9 turnovers total. I dont
think this game can be used as an accurate measure of either team. We
dont know how good either team really is.

There is one set of stats that may mean something however:

                          Colorado             Tenn.

	Passing yards    5 - 19 68yds 3 int   33 - 53 368yds 3 int

Tenn had 235 yds passing in the 4th quarter.

Its a good thing Colorado wasent the team behind by 14 in the 4th.

Its the same old Big-8 story. Cant pass and cant defend the pass. I
have a strong feeling that Nebraska will be the same was against strong
passing teams also, not to mention Oklahoma as well.

By the way, why dident the Tenn. coach go for the 2 point conversion after
either of the 2 comback TD's. I seem to remember a coach that DID go for 2
with the national championship on the line in the Orange Bowl. It dident 
pay off with a win, but the rest of the football world respected him for it.

Nebraska Marty
27.420Geez, they dident loose ya know...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Mon Aug 27 1990 15:255
Gee, the silence in this note is deafening !!!
Why no discussion of the game? I dident see it and would like to hear
some opinions.

Nebraska Marty
27.421UT-CU OverviewCX3COM::J_COTANCHMenNotInPlayoffsSince85WearBlackMon Aug 27 1990 15:2846
    The Buffs had to be happy to be tied at halftime after turning over
    the ball 4 times.  The defense did a good job stopping the Vols
    when they had good field position in the first half, but the 21
    4th-quarter points by UT was a big disappointment.  After CU went
    ahead 24-10 on a punt return by Dave McCloughan, UT went 70 yards
    in 42 seconds, 87 yards in 1:35, and 74 yards in 1:44.  That is
    pathetic, and one of the big reasons for these quick drives was
    lack of a pass rush.
    
    Hagan's passing was very bad, and I thought he should have tucked
    the ball and run on a few occasions.  His running and pitching game
    was impressive, especially on the pitch to Pritchard for a 78-yard
    TD run, although that one was close to being an illegal forward
    pass.  I also feel that CU was forcing the passing game.  I realize
    that Coach Mac wants to improve the passing game, but the Buffs
    had a nice 19 play, 97 yard drive which included only 1 pass.  CU
    still has one of the nation's best running games, even without Bienemy.
    
    Pritchard looked very impressive at tailback (20 carries, 217 yards,
    2 TD's), but he probably won't be playing there any more unless
    Bienemy gets hurt.  Boman had a good game at tight end. 
    
    Overall, the defense was impressive thru 3 quarters, and the Buffs
    came back nice after a terrible start on offense.  And they did
    tie a top-10 team despite turning the ball over 5 times.  If CU
    is going to improve the passing game, obviously Hagan will have
    to develop better accuracy.  On all of his picks, it look like he
    overthrew his receivers.  Penalties and turnovers are also areas
    where the Buffs need to improve to remain a top-10 team.
    
    Did anyone notice the offensive pass-interference penalty against CU
    on their 2nd posession?  The Buffs were penalized 15 yards PLUS
    loss of down, so it was 2nd and 25.  The only time I've ever seen
    a penalty and loss of down is on intentional grounding.
    
    RE -1
    Majors didn't go for 2 because he thought his defense could stop
    CU in 3 plays, and the way his offense had been moving they could
    get into field goal range quickly.  As it turned out, they almost
    did but time ran out.  I thought all along if UT scored to make
    it 31-30 that they would go for 2.
    
    
    Joe
    
    
27.422What a way to start the season!!!4159::NAZZAROSix ballparks in five days!Mon Aug 27 1990 15:4517
    In retrospect, not going for 2 was an excellent decision.  A tie is
    a fair result to this game (which I listened to for most of the
    fourth quarter, and watched some of the first half).  Now, if each team
    goes undefeated the rest of the way, they can still play for the
    national championship on New Year's Day.  It's gonna take a really good
    team to beat either Tennessee or Colorado.
    
    For those who didn't see the game, Tennessee scored with 2:35 left and
    kicked the point after to tie the game at 31.  Colorado got one first 
    down but were stopped at midfield.  Tennessee got the ball back with 50
    seconds left, and with 7 seconds left Webb ran for 25 yards to the
    Colorado 16, but time ran out.  The radio announcers made a big deal
    out of Tennessee letting 15 seconds run off the clock before using a
    time out during this last drive.  Seems like it cost them the game, but
    I'm hazy on the details.  Can anyone fill me in?  Thanks.
    
    NAZZ
27.423I should have watched the gameHUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Mon Aug 27 1990 15:568
re: -1

Ah, I see. If there was that much time left and UT had momentum, then
the UT coach made the right decision.

Thanks for the info NAZZ.

Nebraska Marty
27.424FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Aug 27 1990 16:057
    If both teams can go undefeated the rest of the way it would be a hell
    of a matchup for the national title except Tennessee would be locked
    into the Sugar Bowl and Colorado into the Orange Bowl.
    
    :-(
    
    John
27.425DECWET::METZGERHead Northwest young man....Mon Aug 27 1990 16:1611
Are the BUffs ever going to let this Sal Anuse thing die ?
I don't want to sound un-sympathetic but it has been over a year and the
team is still doing tributes to him. Now before every kickoff they raise their
helmets in "tribute to their fallen leader" (that's what they said on tv)

I'm almost in agreement with Mr. T on this issue and that is scary.


Metz
 
27.426What a joke-- Hagan as Player of the Game...CSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleMon Aug 27 1990 16:2516
    re. 421
    
    While it is true that CU overcame 5 turnovers, let's not forget that TN
    also had 4 turnovers including at least interception in the CU endzone.
    
    re. 422
    
    I think that TN will lose at least 2 games this year.  Sept. 29 at
    Auburn and whenever ND comes to Neyland Stadium.  Not everybody has as
    loose a pass defense as CU and there are certainly lots of teams that
    have much better passing attacks than CU.
    
    On another note, can anyone believe the selection of Hagan as player of
    the game?  5-19, 3 int., 68 yds passing.  I think Pritchard or
    Kelly would have been much better choices.  I guess the people who made
    this selection just could not resist the pre-season hype.
27.427BIG can of worms...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Mon Aug 27 1990 17:2018
    re: .425

>Are the BUffs ever going to let this Sal Anuse thing die ?
>I don't want to sound un-sympathetic but it has been over a year and the
>team is still doing tributes to him. Now before every kickoff they raise their
>helmets in "tribute to their fallen leader" (that's what they said on tv)

Ooohhhhh watch out !!! I agree with you but Colorado fans are 

                     E  X  T  R  E  M  E  L  Y

sensitive on this issue.

I mentioned it at the close of last season in this note and got BLASTED
for it. Basicaly, Colorado fans feel VERY strongly about this while most
fans outside of Colorado feel this had been run into the ground.

Nebraska Marty
27.428BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 27 1990 19:357
    As far as national championship hopes go, this tie will hurt CU very
    little.  They may drop 1 or 2 spots in the polls because they were the
    favorite in the game.  CU was ranked 5th in the AP preseason poll.
    
    NU is ranked 7th in the AP poll and OU 22nd.
    
    Joe
27.429Of course, ND might have moved up with a tie...HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayMon Aug 27 1990 19:519
    >As far as national championship hopes go, this tie will hurt CU very
    >little.  They may drop 1 or 2 spots in the polls because they were the
    >favorite in the game.  CU was ranked 5th in the AP preseason poll.
    
    Only Notre Dame gets that kind of respect in the polls.  CU will drop
    by more than that.  If you're a fan, best that they got it out of the
    way early.
    
    Dan
27.430RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODinz KNOWS flowing!Tue Aug 28 1990 09:428
    Dan,
    
    You really are unreal.  I thought you hated Wade Boggs or the Celtics
    more than anything, I realize it is Notre Dame.  Here is a note
    about the BIG 8, specifically about Colorado, and you put in a cheap
    shot on ND.  Grow up, willya.
    
    JD
27.431Passing game to early in seasonCRBOSS::CLAYBROOKTue Aug 28 1990 10:2310
    I agree with an earlier reply that CU forced the passing game to
    quickly, they were running the ball extremely well, they have a
    punishing ground game. They shouldn't have thrown as much. They've
    only been able to work on the passing game in practice, then to 
    come out against a team like UT in the opener and to think that
    the passing game will click was a big mistake by CU. They should
    have gradually worked it into the system, next week they play
    Stanford, that would have been the time to open it up a litlle
    more.
                                                 Dan
27.432it wasn't a cheap shot it was a factCNTROL::CHILDSBart Gimble,Jerry Hubbard,Happy KineTue Aug 28 1990 10:286
What's a matter JD, the truth hurt?

;^)

mike
27.433Notre Dame Rules and Regulations for DiscourseSHALOT::MEDVIDForce is MachineTue Aug 28 1990 10:5413
    OK, let's get this straight:
    
    - Unless you went to Notre Dame, you are not allowed to make comment on
    the team.
    
    - If you are talking about other schools or college football in
    general, you cannot mention Notre Dame in comparison no matter how
    fact-based your comment is.
    
    Are there any other rules we should be aware of so as not to offend the
    holier-than-thou alums and fans?
    
    	--dan'l
27.435BSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 28 1990 11:517
    Here is a perfect example that shows how much favoritism ND gets in the
    polls:  In the first poll released after the weekend Miami whipped the
    Irish 27-10 last year, one sportswriter actually gave ND a first place
    vote!!  And then Holtz the jerk has the nerve to cry that his team doesn't
    get a fair shake in the polls.
    
    Joe  
27.436NU Opener at Lincoln Saturday on TV...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Tue Aug 28 1990 12:1411
Gee, you guys have hotels ??!!!??

In Nebraska all they have are tents and all transportation is by horse.
Of course, you must carry your gun at all times for fear of Wild Indians
and Okie's.  (Ten Thousand little simily's)

By the way, Nebraska plays Saturday evening on ESPN vs the Baylor Bears.
I've heard Baylor had a good defense buy NU is favored by something like
15 points. Anyone have more info???

Nebraska Marty
27.437consult "The Line"HBAHBA::HAASsame as talking to youTue Aug 28 1990 12:380
27.438Pre Baylor Husker Update fresh from Cornland...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Tue Aug 28 1990 13:0024
I got some more info from the boys in Omaha Field Service.

	NOTE: All non-complimentary references to the Baylor team are
              not Nebraska Marty's idea, nor are they supported by said
              author of this note. (However, you gotta admit, it is
              pretty funny)

>		Here's a couple of notes from husker land I thought
>	you would be interested in. 
>	1. T.O. announced the starting QB for the Baylor Game, it is
>	   Mike Grant but he said that Joseph will play in the first
>	   Half.
>	2. Mike Petko, the Huskers fastest middle line backer ever.
>	   made a miraculus recovery on the knee he injured and will
>	   start saturday night against the Baylor Buttheads.
>	3. Here's a Baylor note for you also. It seems that the 
>	   Buttheads starting Q.B. twisted his knee and according 
>	   to the Baylor coachs will not play saturday night against
>	   the Huskers. A Freshman option QB will start instead. The 
>	   Husker coaches think that the regular QB will start and 
>	   that it is a ploy to fool the Huskers. We'll have to wait
>	   till Saturday night to know for sure.

Nebraska Marty  c/o the boys back in Omaha
27.439Call 'em as I see 'em.HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThank you, FayTue Aug 28 1990 15:435
   >Grow up, willya.
    
    Never.  Principle knows no age.
    
    Dan             
27.440RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODinz KNOWS flowing!Tue Aug 28 1990 18:4815
    RE Dan'l
    
    My note was direct at Dan Schneider.  No one else.  What did his
    comment have to do with CU and Tennessee's tie?  Nothing.  That's
    what.  In what, 1966, ND and Mich. St played to a tie - that's the
    basis of the complaints. Dan is roughly the same age as me - I was
    7 year's old in 1966.   Ancient history and no bearing on the
    discussion.
    To mr. Conatch - So, there was one lunatic fringe voter.  Happens
    all the time - and believe it or not, it happens with other schools,
    included, -gasp- , your mighty'canes.
    
    JD, not an alum, nor holier-than-thou - at least no more than Dan
    is about HIS favorites, Mr. Conatch is about Miami, or Dan'l you
    are about the Steelers.
27.441I was in Anaheim at the GameDENVER::HITETue Aug 28 1990 20:0639
    I attended the CU/UT game in Anaheim on the 26th.  It was truly an
    exciting game--a real nail-biter at times.  I was pleased to see such a
    good turn-out.  There were over 33,000 people there--with lots of CU
    and Tennessee fans there.
    
    As a CU fan, I was disappointed at our many mistakes, but it gave the
    team an opportunity to see where they needed to improve.  It was great
    playing such a good team early in the season.  CU really didn't play a
    super-tough squad until the OU game last year.  So it was goodness to
    play UT prior to our tough preseason schedule.  
    
    re: .426 - Hagan was not the MVP for the game.  Mike Pritchard and Andy
    Kelly received the MVP awards.
    
    During half Coach Robinson of Grambling received an achievement award
    from the Pigskin Classic/Disney organization.  It was a great half time
    show and a great tribute to a well-respected coach.
    
    CU does a good portion of their recruiting in California, so it was
    good to be playing a ballgame there in LA.  We sat in back of a group
    of guys who had gone to high school with Rico Smith.  They went nuts
    went he caught a key 4th down pass in the fourth quarter.
    
    re: the complaint about continuing the "Sal Anuese thing", I am one of
    those touchy fans Marty was talking about.  That tragedy had a strong
    effect on those kids, and it is not something they will easily shrug
    off.  But look at it this way--they had an incredible season last year. 
    Doesn't it make sense that they would continue some of the traditions
    of last year, ie, raising helmets during kickoffs.  I think that has
    more to do with team solidarity than Sal.
    
    In closing, I am glad and amazed that CU, after all their mistakes, did
    not lose the game.  I know they will learn a lot from this game.  And I
    am glad it was a tie--partly because my husband is a UT grad, but also
    because both teams are so good, it's great that neither is going into
    preseason with a loss.
    
    Regards,
    Jan
27.442CSC32::J_PARSONSGeorge Stark: Not A Very Nice GuyTue Aug 28 1990 21:456
    >re: .426 - Hagan was not the MVP for the game.  Mike Pritchard and Andy
    >Kelly received the MVP awards.
    
    The telecast that I watched (NBC) certainly gave it to Hagan. I was
    pretty much in shock when they made that announcement. Pritchard and
    Kelly were certainly the deserving parties for the award IMHO. 
27.443The Baylor BearsBSS::JCOTANCHWed Aug 29 1990 12:1923
    
    
    
    Taken from Don Heinrich's 1990 College Preview:
    
    Baylor finished last in the SWC in total offense last year with a 307.4
    yard per game average and only 22 TD's.  This year's offensive line is
    experienced, and BU plans to go to more of a ball-control offense. 
    Running back Robert Strait is a redshirt freshman who missed last
    season after arriving as the best RB recruit ever at Baylor. 
    
    The defense should be solid, although they lost James Francis, last
    year's SWC Defensive Player of the Year.  They return 3 starters on the
    defensive line in their 4-3 defense.  The Bears led the SWC and
    finished ninth nationally in total defense yielding 279.7 yards per
    game last year.  BU returns 7 starters in all on defense, and should be
    a fairly good test for NU's young offense.
    
    The game should be interesting for about a half, but I think NU will
    end up winning by about 3 or 4 TD's.  This should be NU's toughest
    non-conference opponent.
    
    Joe
27.444Big Red Will Prevail...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Wed Aug 29 1990 13:0524
>    The defense should be solid, although they lost James Francis, last
>    year's SWC Defensive Player of the Year.  They return 3 starters on the
>    defensive line in their 4-3 defense.  The Bears led the SWC and
>    finished ninth nationally in total defense yielding 279.7 yards per
>    game last year.  BU returns 7 starters in all on defense, and should be
>    a fairly good test for NU's young offense.

Since Nebraska is only returning 2 offensive starters and the QB is new,
I think that the Huskers may sputter in the first half. You may see some
dumb mistakes such as penalties, fumbles, problems in passing game etc...

I also thing that the Bugeaters (Nebraska's nick-name before it was the
Cornhuskers) will prevail big in the second half.

Nebraskas defense is the Huskers fastest ever. I think they will be tough.
Baylor may have trouble scoring. My prediction, and remember, you heard it
here FIRST (But remember, I am almost NEVER right on my predictions):

	Halftime	Final

	Huskers  10	Huskers  38
	Bears    7	Bears    10

Nebraska Marty
27.445Pritchard/Kelly Official MVP'sDENVER::HITEWed Aug 29 1990 13:287
    re:442 
    
    I was at the game and Mike Pritchard and Andy Kelly received trophies
    for MVP from the Disney sponsors of the game.  That would make them the
    official MVP's.  It looks like NBC just nominated their own MVP!
    
    Jan
27.446Rah, Rah, Rah, Siss, Boom, Bah, Go for the Tie!AXIS::ROBICHAUDDinz welches again!Wed Aug 29 1990 13:508
    	Why did Tennessee go for the tie?  Because they saw Florida
    State lose any chance for the mythical national championship a few
    years ago when they lost to Miami in the first game of the season.
    With about 2:00 to go neither coach was going to risk winning the
    game.  Take the tie and the chance for a better bowl game with more
    money.  That's what college football's all about.
    
    				/Don
27.447QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Aug 29 1990 14:2017
   I've never agreed with the thinking that says:

   Down 1   a few seconds left   you run or pass the ball for 2 pts.
    
   and ` go for the win '.

   My guesstimate, just from watching a lot of college ball, is that the 2
   point play stands about a 20% chance of success, while the kicked extra
   point is successful about 95%+ of the time.

   I call it going for the loss.

   It's only one game out of a season. Take the tie. Be a hero next week.

   Mike JN


27.448Ties and other stuffCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleWed Aug 29 1990 14:5917
    
    Well, I am glad that at least one other person saw NBC award the MVP to
    Hagan.  Bill Walsh was shocked to say the least.
    
    Majors now holds the lead among active 1A coaches with the most ties. 
    Teams of his now have 9 ties.
    
    TN was 2 stoopid(TM) plays away from at least having a chance to win the
    game.  They had 2 and 1 on the CU 41 with 25 seconds left.  They threw
    2 incomplete passes with ran 18 seconds off the clock.  They then ran
    the draw play that took the ball to the 16 and time ran out.  They
    could have run the draw on 2nd down and gained 5 or 6 yards to put them
    in FG range.  The CU defensive line was totally worn out by that time
    of the game.
    
    I will be glad when real football season starts(you know, when the SEC
    season gets underway).
27.449Big Eight PredictionsBSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 30 1990 14:1229
    
    1. Colorado        Last year was no fluke. The Buffs are loaded with
                       talent and will repeat as Big-8 Champions.
    
    2. Oklahoma        People are underestimating OU. The Sooners had a lot
                       of injuries last year and have a strong defense.
                       They get NU in Norman.
    
    3. Nebraska        Inexperience on offense but very solid on defense.
                       They will miss Gdowski, but should win no less than 
                       9 games for the 22nd consecutive year.
    
    4. Iowa State      Will depend on the running of Bryant very much. The
                       Cyclones may go to a minor bowl.
    
    5. Oklahoma St.    With Gundy gone there's a big hole in the offense,
                       but the Cowboys will be respectable.
    
    6. Kansas          This team has a positive attitude going into 1990,
                       but with the tough non-con schedule KU may not match
                       last year's 4 wins.
    
    7. Missouri        The Tigers have an explosive passing game, but not
                       much of a ground game and a Swiss-cheese defense.
    
    8. Kansas State    No comment.
    
    
    Joe 
27.450Too early for Boldness...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Thu Aug 30 1990 18:249
re: -1

No comment unitll I see the results of Nebraska, Oklahoma, and
Colorado's first 4 games or so.

Of course, as a Nebraska fan, I have much more optimism for the Huskers
than 3rd in the conference. But I wont predict yet.

Nebraska Marty
27.451A Sad Day....HUSKER::BAUERFri Aug 31 1990 15:0718
    Yesterday Tom Osborne announced that they were Officially putting 
    
    Terry Rogers jersy (#20) back into retirement. He said that Terry
    
    just had to much pain in his knee to continue playing and that he
    
    was going to take a medical hardship year to maintain his 
    
    scholarship. Maybe some day the huskers will again have the 
    
    opportunity to bring the jersy out of retirement for Terrys son.
    
    Terry was a terrific benifit to the husker squad, and he will
    
    be greatly missed.
    
    Go Huskers
27.452Ya NEVER Wanna Hear About an Injury...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Fri Aug 31 1990 17:2114
Too bad about Terry Rodgers.

He was the blue-chip halfback recruit son of Johnny Rodgers, the former
Nebraska Wingback Heisman Trophy winner who played during the Huskers
back-to-back National Championships of '70 and '71.

When Nebraska won the recruiting battle for Terry, the Huskers decided
to bring Johnny's number 20 out of retirement for son Terry. It looked
like Terry would have a promising career at NU.

But the Knee thing has sidelined it for now. Hope he can come back. And
most of all I hope the kid gets an education !!!

Nebraska Marty
27.453Much Room for Improvement, but TONS of Young Talent...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Tue Sep 04 1990 17:5858
    Overall, the Huskers did not look inpressive in their season opener
    vs Baylor. 13 - zip Nebraska.
    
    Both teams blew chances. Or should I say Nebraska blew 2 chances inside
    the 5 while Baylor blew 1.
    
    Nebraska's young offense looked quite rusty. However they do look very
    talent laden. They may be able to put it together by the time they hit
    another tought opponent. Baylor was no Florida State buy they werent a
    Kansas State either. The Bears D is a good one.
    
    Mike Grant had a nice touch on his passes. He looks like he has
    potential to be a good field general also. Scott Turner is one awesome
    back. Definately better than Flowers, and Flowers is good.
    
    Coach Osborne said that backup fullback Lance Lewis (Sounds like a
    comic book character) could be Nebraska's best fullback EVER. Now that
    is an amazing statement considering 2 factors:
    
    	1. S.F. 49ers Rathman played at Nebraska.
    	2. Osborne hardly every gives out praise like that.
    
    Now if Osborne would just throw to his backs a little more...
    
    Anyway, the Huskers offense only has 2 return starters and they are
    both offensive lineman. By the way, 3 of NU's starting offensive line
    are walk-on's.
    
    It also looked like NU has some wingbacks who have a little quickness
    also. If only coach would just throw a little more...
    
    Scott Turner is going to be one great back. He also has the size to
    go onto the pro's. This guy is going to get a lot of attention. Bet
    on it.
    
    The Husker defense looked real good. NU has some horses on D this
    year. They look mean and they look tuff!!! Cooper (free safety) and
    Deaf tackle Walker look particuraly good. Linbacker Tyrance was also
    impressive.
    
    By the way, When Baylor funbled inside the NU 5 after their only
    sustained drive of the day, the replay clearly showed the funble
    was caused by a helmet shot to the ball by Tyrance.
    
    Baylor dident throw much but they attempted to throw more than the
    stats reveal. NU had 5 sacks. The NU defensive line was all over the
    Baylor QB.
    
    In summary, the Huskers offense if VERY young and needs much fine
    tuneing. However they are loaded with talent. The potential is there
    to be VERY good. Time will tell.
    
    The NU defense if experienced and fast. We'll have to see how they
    handle a pro set passing offense though.
    
    GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED 
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.454FMCSSE::BROWNBombBombBomb,BombBomb IraqTue Sep 04 1990 18:527
    
    You can bet Dr. Tom will be a little more selective next time he's
    looking for a Soft touch to begin the season. Those Baylor boy's did
    some serious hitting on the Cornholer's from Lincoln. One or two less
    mistake's and  the Bear's would've been the one's celebrating.
    
    Cadzilla
27.455BSS::JCOTANCHTue Sep 04 1990 20:5424
    IMO the Baylor-NU game was pretty entertaining despite the lack of
    scoring.  I thought NU's inability to move the ball consistently was
    more because of Baylor's tough, hard-hitting defense, although the NU
    offense is quite green.  It seemed that Osborne kept the offense fairly
    basic, with only 8 pass attempts and not much of the perimeter option
    game.  
    
    One thing that should be brought up is that NU recovered 2 first-half
    fumbles by Baylor, but the ballcarrier was ruled down.  Replays clearly
    showed that the ballcarrier was not down and it should've been NU's
    ball.  
    
    In other Big-8 games:
    
    OSU    10            #15 Virginia  59
    Tulsa   3                Kansas    10
    
    Don't forget that CU plays this THURSDAY at 6 MDT on ESPN against
    Stanford.  This should be CU's only non-conference breather.
    
    In this week's AP poll, CU dropped from 5th to 6th and NU dropped from
    7th to 10th.
    
    Joe
27.456The "Green" Team...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Wed Sep 05 1990 00:2325
>         ... I thought NU's inability to move the ball consistently was
>    more because of Baylor's tough, hard-hitting defense, although the NU
>    offense is quite green.  It seemed that Osborne kept the offense fairly
>    basic, with only 8 pass attempts and not much of the perimeter option
>    game.  
    
I agree. It was very obvious that Dr. Tom was being even more conservative
than normal with his "green" offense. I watched the tape again and with 
this in mind it was clear to see that NU had supperior talent. We will see
how long it takes for this "green" offense to mature. It's loaded with
potential. It could make for another great NU-CU clash.

>    One thing that should be brought up is that NU recovered 2 first-half
>    fumbles by Baylor, but the ballcarrier was ruled down.  Replays clearly
>    showed that the ballcarrier was not down and it should've been NU's
>    ball.  

I wasent gonna say anything about it but since someone else did...

These were both bad calls. re: -2 with this in mind I think it should be
that with a few correct calls this could have been a normal NU blowout.
And I stress the "could have" !!! Baylor is gonna give some other good
teams some fits this year.

Nebraska Marty
27.457FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Wed Sep 05 1990 11:257
    Being a Big Red fan I sure was glad to see them slip by Baylor.
    They have some awesome talent but my concern is the conservative
    nature of NU offense.  Osborne has not yet learned that a quarterback
    can throw the ball every once in a while. This will always limit their
    chances for a national championship.  Marty, your p-name says it all.
    
    John R.
27.458Oops...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 05 1990 13:267
    re: My own note a few back...
    
    It's Scott Baldwin, not Scott "Turner". Dont know where I got that.
    Guess maybee I was hoping for the spirit of Turner Gill to reutrn to
    Lincoln    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.459???MILPND::VLASAKJust say NO...to Japan!Wed Sep 05 1990 14:138
    What's the story on Baldwin?
    
    Where's he from and who recruited him?
    
    Thanks,
    
    Bob V.
    
27.460Hope this helpsRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGriffey's to the left, Griffey's to the right.Wed Sep 05 1990 14:317
    Baldwin?
    
    He's from Piano, Ohio.   Recruited by a guy named Steinway.  He
    may be a key contributer.  He's an upright guy.  He's cut from the
    classic mold, but he's tough when his bach's to the wall....
    
    JD
27.461QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Sep 05 1990 15:141
   GOOD GRIEF!!!!!!!
27.462Too heavy, though...tips the scalesHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERJail for the New Kids!Wed Sep 05 1990 15:424
    JD, you forgot that Baldwin played his college days in Minnesota.  He
    really excelled in the home games at the MetroNome.
    
    Dan
27.463Ma! It wuz JD started it, ma!MCIS1::DHAMELTools? What Tools?Wed Sep 05 1990 15:563
    
    Baldwin works for Apple in the off-season.
    
27.464OSU may be improvingPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Sep 06 1990 12:2525
    OSU's defense may be finally improving this year.  Lasted week's
    game against Tulsa the Cowboys gave up only 159 yards with 83
    of that being in the air against 4 year starting QB TJ Rubley.
    In the past three games against TU they gave up a total of 888
    yards and 6 TDs.
    
    Offensively, OSU should have a more experienced line than last
    year.  With speedster, Curtis Mayfield and Brent Parker as
    receivers and several good RBs they should start to show some
    productive offensive--that is, if QB Chris Smith can run the
    show.  He has been backing up Mike Gundy until MG graduated
    last year.  (Gundy is still around since he's been hired as
    an offensive coach).  Smith has good size for a QB and a
    strong, accurate arm.  He seems to have a cool head but may
    lack Gundy's scrambling and improvising abilities.  It's hard
    to tell since Smith only played the last few minutes of any
    games until last week.  In his first start, against TU last
    week, his stats looked fairly good: 9 completions out of 18
    with no interceptions for 60 yards.  The Cowboys kept it on
    the ground mostly, with 230 yards.
    
    This week will be a better test: at Florida
    
    Cowboy
    
27.465Before It's Too Late...BSS::JCOTANCHBring Back Gerry!Thu Sep 06 1990 18:5512
    The Buffs play a mediocre Stanford team tonight with a decent offense,
    but the only question is how much CU will win by.  I think the Buffs
    will more than cover the 20-point spread.  It will be interesting to
    see if CU continues to pass the ball more, how Hagan looks throwing the
    ball, and how Bienemy does in his first game.
    
    A good game featuring a Big-8 team this Saturday is OU at UCLA.  I
    believe it is on ABC, but not sure.  Yes, the Sooners are still on
    probation, but can be on TV this season.
    
    Joe
                                       
27.466Halftime Stanford 14 CU 0CSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleThu Sep 06 1990 23:345
    
    Halftime score Stanford 14 Colorado 0.
    
    CU is going to have to hustle to cover the spread.
    
27.467What's up?CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Thu Sep 06 1990 23:505
    Any new scores to report on the CU game??
    
    
    
    
27.468LUDWIG::GARRYBring on the A'sFri Sep 07 1990 00:367
    14-14 with 11:38 to go
    
    #86 for colarado just dropped a 35 yd td pass wide open on 3rd down.
    
    cu missed a long field goal.
    
    Tom
27.469More Please...CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 00:5110
    
    More More........Sounds like a good game,but like CU is making this
    game harder than it should be.
    
    
    Drewski
    
    
    
    
27.470CSC32::J_PARSONSGeorge Stark: Not A Very Nice GuyFri Sep 07 1990 01:101
    Final CU 21 Stanford 17
27.471GOLF::KINGRSave the EARTH, we may need it later!!!Fri Sep 07 1990 01:1035
    Sanford leads 17-14 with 3 down ..... 
    Wait...
    Colo first down at the Sanford 3...
    not too much time left...
    Officials call for a measurment...
    inches short of a first down
    4 down and inches... 2 yard line...
    The play...
    QB sneak...
    First down!!!!!!!!!!!! for Colorado... 33 seconds  left..
    officials want a measurment ... first down!!!!!
    WOW what a game....
    time out...
    Colorado with 2 time outs remaining... Ball on the Sanford 1 yard
    line...
    The hike... 
    Hemingway... up the middle.. 1/2 yard...  time out Col.
    30 seconds left...second down...
    Hand off Hemingway again... no gain time out COl....
    third down... 1/2 yard to go... will Col. go for the tie or the win...
    22 seconds left...
    COL will go for the win....
    The ball is snapped...
    Fake hand off to Hemingway..   the QB throws up a pass to the TE...
    incompleted......
    fourth down and Col is going for it...
    QB hands off to (enemie sp) and scores!@!!!!
    21-17   with 12 seconds left to play....
    
    What a game....
    
    Final... COl. 21 Sanford 17... 
    
    REK
    
27.472Yea %?CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 01:179
    
    Sounds like a close one..................Hope CU get It Together...
    
    
    
    Drewski
    
    
    
27.473GREAT CALL!!!CSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 01:3712
    
    Thanks REK,
    
    That was a Great Play by Play call, We don't have cable here.
    that we can get too.
    
    P.S REK you should think about trying out for a play by play
        analyst..I could see exactly what you were saying.
    
    Drewski
    
    
27.474Stanford looks better than mediocre.KEPNUT::DIGGINSFri Sep 07 1990 10:1210
    
    Gee that mediocre bunch of guy's at Stanford almost pulled it 
    out! I caught the last couple of minutes, which turned out to be
    about 15 minutes actual time! Bienemey looks good, could be a 
    Heisman candidate.
    
    
    
    
    Steve
27.475Too Close For ComfortBSS::JCOTANCHBring Back Gerry!Fri Sep 07 1990 12:0622
    Well, a disappointing showing, but CU showed some adversity in coming
    back from the 14-0 deficit.  Stanford was showing some different looks
    on defense with a stacked front, daring the Buffs to throw.  The
    intriguing aspect of the game is that Stanford was able to stop the CU
    running up the middle AND on the perimeter.  CU's passing game is
    getting better but still needs quite a bit of work.  3 or 4 of Hagan's
    passes were dropped, the most prominent of which was the drop by a
    wide-open Rico Smith at the goal line when is was 14-14.
    
    Overall, the defense had a good game.  On Stanford's 2 first-quarter
    scoring drives, they only had to go 20 yards and 1 yard.  After it was
    14-0, Stanford only got 1 first down until their field-goal drive late
    in the 4th quarter.  CU held Stanford to 75 yards rushing and outgained
    Stanford 432 to 230 in total offense.
    
    Penalties and turnovers are still hurting the Buffs. 
    
    CU definitely needs to step it up a notch when they go into Champain
    next week.  After this showing last night, the Buffs deserve to drop 2
    or 3 notches in the polls IMO.
    
    Joe
27.476Give CU Credit for Comming Back...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 13:4659
Colorado's first 2 games brings up some questions:

	Is Colorado Over-Rated ???

	Is Colorado not Over-Rated and it's just that everyone is just
	 gunning extra hard for them ???

	How good/bad is Stanford ???

	How good/bad is Tennessee ???

	Colorado is supposed to be better than last year because of
	 experience and returning starters. If this years expectations
	 are based on last year - then was last years season really 
	 just a Cinderella season then ???

	Is the Colorado team pressing to try to meet expectations ???

	Has the Colorado team lost last years mental edge (aka - SAL) ???

	Is this just early season bugs that Colorado will work out ???

	Was it just that Colorado has rarely ever been a 21 point favorite
	 and they were over-confident ???

	What will happen if they get behind 14-0 to a powerhouse ???

Only time will tell !!!

And what about Nebraska ???

	Is Nebraska Over-Rated considering their inexperience on offense ???

	Is Baylor any good ???

	Will Nebraska's young offense gell with experience ???

	Nebrska's defense looked very good against Baylor. But will it
	 hold up against a passing team (aka - FSU) ???

	Since we know the Huskers will go to the Orange Bowl this year,
	 will they win it ???   (Just a little joke you guys !!!)

Only time will tell !!!

And what about Oklahome ???

	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Only time will tell !!!

Nebraska Marty
27.477Some AnswersBSS::JCOTANCHBring Back Gerry!Fri Sep 07 1990 14:2061
   >>	Is Colorado Over-Rated ???

        No, but just because they have the talent, they still must do more 
        than just show up.
 
   >>	Is the Colorado team pressing to try to meet expectations ???

        I think they might be, especially Hagan, being a Heisman candidate.

   >>	Has the Colorado team lost last years mental edge (aka - SAL) ???

        The Sal factor may be gone, but the Buffs are driven this year by:
         1) To become the first CU team to repeat as Big-8 champs
         2) Wanting to win the national championship after coming 
            within 1 win of it last year.
         3) Prove last year was no fluke and they belong among the nation's
            elite college football teams.

   >>	Is this just early season bugs that Colorado will work out ???

        I certainly hope so.  The passing game will go through some growing 
        pains, but they must cut down on turnovers & penalties.  One of the
        keys to last year's success was they only had 13 turnovers all season.

   >>	Was it just that Colorado has rarely ever been a 21 point favorite
	 and they were over-confident ???
 
        Yes, I definitely think so.

   >>	What will happen if they get behind 14-0 to a powerhouse ???

        Good question, but the smart thing to do would be to stick with their
        game plan unless it's late in the game.

   >>	Is Nebraska Over-Rated considering their inexperience on offense ???

        For this early in the year, I say yes.  If they were playing a top-20
        team last week, NU would be 0-1.

   >>	Will Nebraska's young offense gell with experience ???

        Without a doubt.  They will have plenty time to gel with their schedule,
        and they will undoubtedly go into the CU game 8-0.

   >>	Since we know the Huskers will go to the Orange Bowl this year,
	 will they win it ???   (Just a little joke you guys !!!)

        HA HA!!

   >>   And what about Oklahome ???

	I think they will be much improved, and they are on ABC tomorrow at
        1:30 against UCLA.

   >>   Only time will tell !!!

        The best answer to all these questions!


Joe
27.478give em timePOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Sep 07 1990 15:058
    CU's offense should improve with each game.  When you look at
    how many of Oklahoma's early games that were close and that
    they should have lost then its obvious that CU has the same
    problem.  It takes a few games to get the timing down in the
    Wishbone and probably makes it more difficult when they're trying
    to make Hagan a passing QB at the same time.
    
    Cowboy  
27.479HTHRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGriffey's to the left, Griffey's to the right.Fri Sep 07 1990 15:187
    Is Colorado overrated?
    
    Yep - they were last year, and they are again this year.   They
    suffer from 'Bronco-itis' - fanatical fans, lots of hype, but fish
    bones in the throat when it matters.
    
    JD
27.480An HONEST CU Fans Opinion...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 16:22114
re: .476

The Colorado fans answers...

Disclaimer: This is meant to be humorous. The OBVIOUS overstatement
            should convince all readers that THIS IS A JOKE !!!

>	Is Colorado Over-Rated ???

	  Are you kidding. They are under-rated. They should be rated
	  number 1 in the universe. Everyone knows the Buffs are gods !!!

>	Is Colorado not Over-Rated and it's just that everyone is just
>	 gunning extra hard for them ???

          Obviously !!!

>	How good/bad is Stanford ???

          The way they played Colorado, they should be rated number 3.

>	How good/bad is Tennessee ???

          They were lucky to be even close in the Colorado game. However
          they should be rated a distant 2nd !!!

>	Colorado is supposed to be better than last year because of
>	 experience and returning starters. If this years expectations
>	 are based on last year - then was last years season really 
>	 just a Cinderella season then ???

           NO, NO, you got it all wrong. The whole countries expextations
           of the Buffs have NOTHING to do with last year. Everyone knows
           that CU has THE most talent and the BEST coach in the universe.

>	Is the Colorado team pressing to try to meet expectations ???

           NO, they are totally relaxed !!! Remember they played the
           numbers 2 and 3 teams in the nation the first 2 games.

>	Has the Colorado team lost last years mental edge (aka - SAL) ???

           Aw come on. We all know that half these guys dont know what
           the word mental means. Exept for the entire CU team. I think
           every starter is a Road Scholar aint they ???

>	Is this just early season bugs that Colorado will work out ???

           Bugs, what bugs, where's the Raid !!!

>	Was it just that Colorado has rarely ever been a 21 point favorite
>	 and they were over-confident ???

           Geez, the pre-game spread means nothing. The oddsmakers know 
           that CU is the best college football team ever, even better
           than the great Nebraska and Oklahoma national champions of past
           years, they just do this to sucker people into betting the
           mortgage.

>	What will happen if they get behind 14-0 to a powerhouse ???

           Inconcieveable Unbelievable Unspellable and not Possible

> Only time will tell !!!

           Time ??? Oh yea, it's lunch time.

And what about Nebraska ???

>	Is Nebraska Over-Rated considering their inexperience on offense ???

           Absalutely !!! The Bugeaters are over-rated every year. They 
           should something like number, uh, year, number 50 or so.

	Is Baylor any good ???

           Baylor should be rated about number 120 or so. Just think what
           problem Nebraska would have with number 3 rated Stanford. 
           Probably something like Sanford 55 and NU 3.

>	Will Nebraska's young offense gell with experience ???

           The only "gell" they will ever have in on their greasy heads !!!

>	Nebrska's defense looked very good against Baylor. But will it
>	 hold up against a passing team (aka - FSU) ???

           Nebraska sucks period !!! Dosent matter that they have NEVER
           been on probation even though the NCAA has gone thru the
           program with a fine-toothed comb recently, we just hate them.

>	Since we know the Huskers will go to the Orange Bowl this year,
>	 will they win it ???   (Just a little joke you guys !!!)

           Nebraska in the Orange Bowl ??? They have never been there
           in history and never will be.

Only time will tell !!!

           Time, oh yea, it's time for desert.

And what about Oklahome ???

           Oklahoma ??? Oh it dosent matter that they creamed us for 5000
           seasons in a row. We beat them last year when half the team was
           injured and now THAT monkey is totally off our back. The Okie's
           are no problem. Cant that Nebraska Marty spell anything ???

Only time will tell !!!

           Geez I'm getting full.


Nebraska Marty in Jest
27.481An HONEST Husker Fans Answers...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 16:29121
re: .476

The Nebraska fans answers...

Disclaimer: This is meant to be humorous. The OBVIOUS overstatement
            should convince all readers that THIS IS A JOKE !!!

>	Is Colorado Over-Rated ???

           Without a doubt. This season will show that last season was
           a complete and utter joke and CU played over their head in
           every game because of "you know who" (cant say THAT name or the
           CU people will have a cow) and they are the scum of the earth.

>	Is Colorado not Over-Rated and it's just that everyone is just
>	 gunning extra hard for them ???

           What ??? Why try harder for a bunch of no-named scumm bucket
           nose pickers who wade in moutain pond scum ???

>	How good/bad is Stanford ???

           Stanford is terrible. They should not be in the top 100. NU
           would beat them by 60 points with the second team !!!

>	How good/bad is Tennessee ???

           They are from the south. They must be even worse than Stanford.

>	Colorado is supposed to be better than last year because of
>	 experience and returning starters. If this years expectations
>	 are based on last year - then was last years season really 
>	 just a Cinderella season then ???

           Obviously !!!


>	Is the Colorado team pressing to try to meet expectations ???

           They can never meet this years expectations because CU sucks !!!

>	Has the Colorado team lost last years mental edge (aka - SAL) ???

           Of course. That is the ONLY thing that gave them any success
           in last years lucky season !!! They are doomed this year. And
           Colorado fans should not even think about the next year, unless
           they like nightmares.

>	Is this just early season bugs that Colorado will work out ???

           Bugs, they got bugs alright, right up the... (Censored for the
           benifit of our family readers)

>	Was it just that Colorado has rarely ever been a 21 point favorite
>	 and they were over-confident ???

           What kind of Moron would make the Colorado Clippers a 21 point
           favorite againse ANYONE ???

>	What will happen if they get behind 14-0 to a powerhouse ???

           Try 35 point. Against the Might Nebraska Huskers that is, this
           November 3rd !!!

> Only time will tell !!!

           Time ??? Oh yea, I think I'll go steal the Cu fans lunch.

And what about Nebraska ???

>	Is Nebraska Over-Rated considering their inexperience on offense ???

           No way man !!! Nebraska is under-rated every year. In fact, the
           Huskers have had the best team on the field every year since the
           back-to-back national championships of '70 and '71. It's just
           that the refs, an NCAA plot, a Russion plot, and God have taken
           it away from us every year.

	Is Baylor any good ???

           Oh, Baylor is definately a quality team. Best defense in the
           nation, behind the Huskers that is, and they should be rated
           number 2.

>	Will Nebraska's young offense gell with experience ???

           Gell ??? They are already the best in the universe !!!

>	Nebrska's defense looked very good against Baylor. But will it
>	 hold up against a passing team (aka - FSU) ???

           Heck, are you kidding. Baylor was one of the best passing
           teams around. We sacked them 5 times then they were afraid
           to pass so they ran into out sky high corn wall !!!

>	Since we know the Huskers will go to the Orange Bowl this year,
>	 will they win it ???   (Just a little joke you guys !!!)

           Aw, dont be a silly willy. Of course we will win the Orange
           Bowl over Notre Dame and the national championship. We want
           ND just because thats who CREAMED the Colorado Clippers in
           last years Orange Bowl that we let CU go to.

Only time will tell !!!

           Time ??? Time is no factor in Nebraska. Everything has been
           the same here for the last 15 centuries.

And what about Oklahome ???

           Probation U sucks PERIOD !!! They are out of our hair now
           anyway now that the world knows how much they CHEAT !!!
           Not to mention rapes in the dorms, shootings, coke ...

Only time will tell !!!

           Time dosent need to tell us anything. The Huskers are THE
           greatest !!!

Nebraska Marty in Jest (Not really, I believe in everyting in this note
                        with all my heart !!!!)   ;^)   
27.482An Oklahoma Fans Answers...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 16:34132
re: .476

The Oklahoma fans answers...

Disclaimer: This is meant to be humorous. The OBVIOUS overstatement
            should convince all readers that THIS IS A JOKE !!!

>	Is Colorado Over-Rated ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	Is Colorado not Over-Rated and it's just that everyone is just
>	 gunning extra hard for them ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	How good/bad is Stanford ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	How good/bad is Tennessee ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	Colorado is supposed to be better than last year because of
>	 experience and returning starters. If this years expectations
>	 are based on last year - then was last years season really 
>	 just a Cinderella season then ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!


>	Is the Colorado team pressing to try to meet expectations ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	Has the Colorado team lost last years mental edge (aka - SAL) ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	Is this just early season bugs that Colorado will work out ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	Was it just that Colorado has rarely ever been a 21 point favorite
>	 and they were over-confident ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	What will happen if they get behind 14-0 to a powerhouse ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

> Only time will tell !!!

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

And what about Nebraska ???

>	Is Nebraska Over-Rated considering their inexperience on offense ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

	Is Baylor any good ???

           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!
           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!

>	Will Nebraska's young offense gell with experience ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	Nebrska's defense looked very good against Baylor. But will it
>	 hold up against a passing team (aka - FSU) ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

>	Since we know the Huskers will go to the Orange Bowl this year,
>	 will they win it ???   (Just a little joke you guys !!!)

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

Only time will tell !!!

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

And what about Oklahome ???

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

Only time will tell !!!

           Duuhhhhh, we just want Switzer back !!!
           All the radio stations accress the country should play more
           Boomer Sooner !!!

Nebraska Marty in Jest
27.483GENRAL::WADESittin' on the dock of the bay...Fri Sep 07 1990 17:454
    
    	Better not quit your day job.
    
    	Claybone
27.484Cornholers must need the laughsFMCSSE::BROWNRound'n Third and Head'n for HomeFri Sep 07 1990 18:027
    
    	Claybone:
    
     You'd think he could find a better way to waste KO's money than
    that useless BS.
    
    Cadzilla
27.485Go watch LAST YEARS CU films or something...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 18:0910
    re: last 2
    
    Did it on lunch hour. Get a personality, get a sense of humor,
    Get a life !!!
    
    Sick of you picky, whiny, super senditive Buff fans. Geez, I tore up
    NU fans just as much. Just trying to have a little fun. Is it in you
    to have some too ???
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.486Sc**w CU and Uncle Tom tooFMCSSE::BROWNRound'n Third and Head'n for HomeFri Sep 07 1990 18:187
    
    Hell boy Could care less about CU. Being on your lunch does not give
    you any priv to write anything you wish. Get real, don't take everything
    so damn personal. As I've been lead to believe bashin each other is 
    part of this here conference , just ask the Saw man. 
    
    Cadzilla
27.487I guess this is where we can take out our frustrationsBSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 18:255
    Hey Saw Man, is bashin each other a part of this conference ???
    
    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.488GENRAL::WADESittin' on the dock of the bay...Fri Sep 07 1990 18:2716
    
  
  >  Did it on lunch hour. Get a personality, get a sense of humor,
  
     I've got a sense of humor.  I sense you ain't funny unless you
     count looks.
    
  >   Get a life !!!
   
     Got one.  Thanks anyway.
     
  >  Sick of you picky, whiny, super senditive Buff fans.
   
     Don't puke on the carpet.  Use the men's room.
     
     Claybone
27.489Only in the Sports Notesfile...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 19:285
    Ahhhhh yes. Another day of general and personal mud-slinging here
    in the Sports Notesfile. What would we do without this to brighten
    up our days???   ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.490Good thing we got plenty of disk space...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 19:305
    Maybee we could start a new note. We could call it:
    
    	Ask the Saw Man.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.491CAM::WAYGoin' on Jamaican tour, mon...Fri Sep 07 1990 20:2413
>
>    Maybee we could start a new note. We could call it:
>    
>    	Ask the Saw Man.
    

Sure, why not.   I know answers to a lot of questions (in fact I'm 
vicious at full contact Trivial Pursuit), and the ones I don't have
answers for, I'd just make up answers...

Hey, sounds neat, let's do it!

'Saw
27.492Guess I'll just stay here at my terminal all day...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 07 1990 20:4110
    re: .483
    
    Hey Claybone, I guess this hurts my contract negotiations with the
    Comedy Corner, huh !!!
    
    Not a good comedian,
    
    ...but a die hard Husker Fan,
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.493A real charmin scheduleFMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableMon Sep 10 1990 13:276
    
    Yo Marty
    
      Who's the Cornholers soft touch this week?
    
    Cadzilla
27.494Other notes have entire big-8...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Sep 10 1990 14:395
    re: -1
    
    See note 27.369 for the Huskers schedule over the next 6 years.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.495A Little More Cautious This Year ??????BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 12 1990 13:023
    WHAT !!! No CU at Illinois predictions ???????????
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.496They're coming...It's only WednesdayBSS::JCOTANCHBring Back Gerry!Wed Sep 12 1990 13:061
    
27.497Another charmin gameFMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableWed Sep 12 1990 13:2412
    
    re-2
    
    	Here's one for you Marty
    
    
    	nu 60 minn. 3
    
    
    	Uncle tom runs it up on another soft touch.
    
    Cadzilla
27.498I agree...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 12 1990 13:306
    re: -1
    
    I'm the first to admit that NU's schedule STINKS !!!
    See not 27.370
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.499big 2 and the little 6FMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableWed Sep 12 1990 13:409
    
    re-1
    
      Glad to see an honest fan. It would seem to me that Osborne would
    want a few tough games before he gets into the Big 8 schedule. Even
    though it's been nu and ou for so many years, one of the little
    6 could sneak up on him sometime. 
    
    Cadzilla 
27.500Last Year...CSC32::M_HENDERSONI'm tryin ta think, but nutin happens !!!Wed Sep 12 1990 14:1415
    re: -1
    
    Thru the '80s NU had teams such as Penn State, Florida State, UCLA,
    Auburn, etc... on the schedule. It has only been in the past 2 years
    that this whimpy schedule stuff started.
    
    By the way, one of the little 6 already did sneak up on NU and OU.
    Colorado last year. We shall see if they can change the Big-8 football
    situation into a Big-3 Little 5 for more than a year or 2. Time will
    tell.
    
    I would make a prediction for the CU/Illinois game but I dont want to
    doom the team I pick to win to a sure loss !!!    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.501GENRAL::WADESittin' on the dock of the bay...Wed Sep 12 1990 14:5910
    Not a prediction but a statement.  If they don't stop turning
    the ball over, they won't come close to the season they had
    last year.  The next two weeks are going to be a good indicator
    of how good a team they are.  Illinois was thumped last year
    by the Buffs at Boulder.  They'll be looking to avenge that loss
    this year at their home field.  UT is looking good this year and
    should be a much tougher test than last year.......especially
    since the game is in Austin.
    
    Claybone
27.502CU plays Division 1 SchoolDENVER::HITEWed Sep 12 1990 20:086
    I predict that CU will be playing a Division 1 school.  How about
    Nubrasca.  Who are they playing---Northern Iowa Dental Technicians.
    
    Hey Marty, is it going to be nationally televised?
    
    Jan and Ed in Denver
27.503NU filling a cavityDENVER::HITEWed Sep 12 1990 20:118
    re.502 - NU will be fillng a cavity in Northern Iowa Dental
    Technician's schedule!!!
    
    We predict CU over Illinois by at least two touchdowns.  They are going
    to be serious this weekend, especially knowing that Nubrasca is in the
    meat of their pre-season schedule.
    
    Jan and Ed in Denver
27.504FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Wed Sep 12 1990 20:2811
    Re: 27.503
    
    What's your problem ?  Do you really think Marty has a say-so on who
    Neb plays ?
    
    You CU fans remind me of skinny nerds who lift weights for a month and
    think they are bad-asses.  When you sustain a level of success like
    Neb. then start bashing.  One good year does not make a dynasty.
    
    GO BIG RED!!!!
    
27.505BSS::JCOTANCHBring Back Gerry!Wed Sep 12 1990 20:399
    Actually, Nebraska doesn't even play this week.  They play Minnesota
    the 22nd and Oregon State the week after.  This year's NU non-con
    schedule really isn't quite as bad as some people make it out to be,
    with 3 schools from big-time conferences and only one Division II (or
    is it Division I-AA) school in Northern Illinois.  But on the other
    hand the NU schedule does leave quite a bit to be desired when you look 
    at CU's, OU's, or Kansas' non-conference games.
    
    Joe               
27.506Talk to me in 5 or 10 winning seasons...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Wed Sep 12 1990 21:3462
re: .502,503

Dear Jan and Ed in Denver

Many CU fans have reached a high state of arrogance after only 1 season
of success and after only 2 wins over Nebraska in the entire decade of the
80's. Plus, the CU team is not playing good ball right now. Hardly a basis
for arrogance.

A team and it's fans should carry arrogance (The good kind*) after it has
proven itself year after year. CU had a very good year LAST YEAR but has
yet to prove that they can sustain it. They may or may not be able to, I
don't know.

Actually, the CU HATE of Nebraska is quite illogical. Consider this:

	Nebraska has NEVER been under NCAA probation.
	Oklahoma has been under probation TWICE since the mid '70s.

	Oklahoma has many more Big-8 championships than Nebraska.

	Nebraska has defeated CU something like 22 times in 24 years.
	Oklahoma beat CU something like 24 years straight until last
	 year. (Correct me if I'm wrong on this)

Oklahoma has been more of a thorn in the side of CU than Nebraska has,
yet McArtney set up Nebraska as his "designated rival" the minute he
took over as CU coach. The CU fans HATE Nebraska, yet they sort of 
maybe dislike Oklahoma a little. Their fans do not get up for the
Okie's near as much as for NU. It does not make much sense.

I'm not whining, I'm merely stating a fact. I live in Colorado and I know
how the CU fans and media react first hand. They beat OU and it's a big
feat to them. But they beat NU and it's like the Red Sea has just been
parted and the Egyptians (NU and their fans) have drowned.

WHY ???

There is one thing I know for sure. And that is that when CU comes to
Lincoln the sea of Red in Lincoln will be up for it big time. CU will be
walking into a noise pit of 76,000 crazed fans just like NU did last year at
CU (I guess CU's stadium holds only 55,000 or so). And you cannot tell me it
makes no difference. Plus the spirit of SAL wont be driving the Buffs this
year. I don't think CU fans have much to be arrogant about YET. You though
it was hard to beat Nebraska LAST year (and it was of monumental difficulty)
this year will be even harder.

By the way, did you know that Nebraska's Memorial Stadium as sold out EVERY
game since 1962. Every time a game is played at Nebraska a new NCAA 
attendance record is broken.

Proud of the Huskers winning record, character, fan loyalty, and longevity
of success,

Nebraska Marty

* By "the good kind" I mean the type of arrogant attitude that winning
  year after year gives a team. Such as the Celtics, Lakers, old Yankee's,
  Canadians, UCLA during it's basketball dynasty etc...  I'm speaking
  of the arrogant attitude that says, "were the best and have proven it
  year after year, it's a mistake when we loose and you are up against
  it because you are playing US !!!"
27.507FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Sep 12 1990 22:554
    Northern Illinois is a Division 1-A independent and a former member of
    the Mid America Conference.
    
    John
27.508Quick recovery for OU?DELNI::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 13 1990 11:0229
    
    > This year's NU non-con
    > schedule really isn't quite as bad as some people make it out to be,
    > with 3 schools from big-time conferences and only one Division II (or
    > is it Division I-AA) school in Northern Illinois.
    
    Snicker, snicker... Are you saying this in jest?  Northwestern plays in
    a big-time conference, too.  For a big-time program, the schedules
    don't get any easier than Nebraska's.  It's every bit as bad as people
    make it out to be.  Unfortunately for Nebraska, with computer evaluations 
    and strength-of-schedule statistics around nowadays, the pollsters are 
    getting wise to this kind of blatant padding.  Sports Illustrated said 
    that they weren't really sure how good Nebraska would be, but they 
    couldn't in good conscience rank them very high because of the
    schedule.  And, of course, Nebraska is living proof that the easy
    schedule might get you in or near the top 10 every year, but it don't
    help you in winning the Orange Bowl...
    
    Another big test for Oklahoma this weekend with Pitt at home.  It'd be
    reassuring to see them stuff another passing offense (contrary to
    popular belief, OU's number one problem in the past has been stopping,
    not executing, a passing offense).  If they can pull this one out, a 
    10-1 season is a definite possibility.  Coming in the last year of a
    probation, I'd take it.  (Hell, some of OU's best teams ever have been
    the ones on probation, like the 21-0-1 teams in '73-'74.)
    
    Boomer Sooner,
    glenn
     
27.509FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Thu Sep 13 1990 12:246
    Boomer Sooner Glenn,
    
        If every Sooner player who got in trouble with the law ended up in
    jail the prison team would be Oklahoma's best football team.:):)
    
    GO BIG RED!!!!
27.510Will be a testimony to fair play if Gibbs can win...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 13 1990 12:447
    
    Re -.1:
    
    You better believe it!
    
    glenn
    
27.511GENRAL::WADESittin' on the dock of the bay...Thu Sep 13 1990 12:4536
re .504

>    You CU fans remind me of skinny nerds who lift weights for a month and
>    think they are bad-asses.  When you sustain a level of success like
>    Neb. then start bashing.  One good year does not make a dynasty.

	Oh reeeeeeeeeeeeeeally?  Wanna work out sometime?  We'll bash
	any time we feel like it padnah.  I didn't know that the
	team you happen to root for has to have played good ball for
	20+ years in order to qualify to bash.

re. Marty

	I think part of the reason for the dislike of NU is because
	of what happened last year.  They could not take the loss
	with class.  They whined about a call or two and yapped about
	the best team not winning.  To top it all off, they criticized
	the Buffs for their personal handling of Sal's death.  

	Regardless of your definition of arrogance, OU is not seen
	in the same light as NU because they don't spew nearly as
	much trash (not counting Bosworth).

>Plus the spirit of SAL wont be driving the Buffs this
>year. 

	Why don't YOU give this a break.  I'm getting tired of you
	bringing this up as if it were the only reason the Buffs
	beat the mighty Huskers last year.  

>Proud of the Huskers winning record, character, fan loyalty, and longevity
>of success,

	Hey, that's great.............

Claybone
27.512You reap what you sowDENVER::HITEThu Sep 13 1990 13:1626
    Marty, I think you are a great NU fan.  You are fiercely loyal to your
    team, knowledgeable about the team and the conference, and you have a
    good sense of humor.  I hope that you took the note from Jan and Ed in
    the spirit in which it was written--playful teasing.
    
    If more NU fans were like Marty, I doubt that there would be the hatred
    that exists in the hearts of CU fans for Nebraska.  It's true, the NU
    teams over the last many decades have been great and the NU fans have
    every reason to be proud.
    
    But what is unique about NU fans (as opposed to OU fans) is that they
    have historically not been gracious winners.  They have consistently
    "rubbed their fellow Big 8 opponents' noses into it".
    
    The thing I loved the best about the CU/Tennessee game was that
    afterwards as we were going out to the parking lot, we passed rabid
    rabid rabid Tennessee fans, all painted up in Orange----and across the
    board they all graciously said "Y'all played a great game".   I am sure
    they would have said that if TN had won or if CU had won.  They are
    that kind of fans.
    
    CU fans don't "hate" Nebraska's football team--it's the fans, fans like
    the noter in .504.  Now that is a quintessential Nebraska fan.
    
    My closing comment--------You reap what you sow.  Learn to live with
    it.
27.513A few bad Apples...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Thu Sep 13 1990 13:5373
re: .511

Claybone, I agree with some of your statements but disagree with some.

>	Oh reeeeeeeeeeeeeeally?  Wanna work out sometime?  We'll bash
>	any time we feel like it padnah.  I didn't know that the
>	team you happen to root for has to have played good ball for
>	20+ years in order to qualify to bash.

Thats fine, but you better have something very substantial to back it
up with because others dish out AT LEAST as good as they get.

>	I think part of the reason for the dislike of NU is because
>	of what happened last year.  They could not take the loss
>	with class.  They whined about a call or two and yapped about
>	the best team not winning.  To top it all off, they criticized
>	the Buffs for their personal handling of Sal's death.  

Last year may have aggrivated the situation. BUT the basic premis of
your theory is bull. CU fans have HATED Nebraska LONG before last year.
I can see some reason for it. Untill last year when the Huskers came
to Boulder for the anual wipe out, there would be about 20,000 CU fans
in the stands and about 30,000 NU fans in the stands. It was like a
Husker home game. But that just shows VERY strong fan support. That
shouldent be (and I dont think it is) the only reason CU hates NU.

>	Regardless of your definition of arrogance, OU is not seen
>	in the same light as NU because they don't spew nearly as
>	much trash (not counting Bosworth).

This is not a totally accurate observation by the CU fans.

By the way, thanks for giving me credit for my loyalty. Thats good to
hear from a CU fan.

re: a few back about NU's schedule

No excuse can be made for this year and last year. But up untill then
Nebraska has had good strong pre-Big-8 schedules. You cant knock it
much up untill last year.

re: .512

Thank you VERY much. Sometimes I do get carried away with it though.
You have to understand, Big Red fever is VERY powerful. Us Nebraskans
(and formar Nebraska residents in my case) are proud to a fault of
our ONLY team. We have no pro, and no other big college in the state.
I know that a few bad apples spoil the whole bunch. Believe me, the
majority of Husker fans are NOT as you describe.

EVERY young boy that grows up in Nebraska totally idolizes the Huskers.
Kids dream of growing up to be a Husker. On fall Saturday afternoons
the stores are virually empty because people hover around thier TV's
or radio's for the game. Home victories vs Oklahoma end with the goal
posts not only being torn down, but a giant parade downtown with them.
If you walk around downtown Lincoln before a game you see thousands of
people walking around ALL dressed in red. It's kind of like when a very
small high school makes the state tourny, everyone gets excited. The
state of Nebraska has nothing to be proud of outside of agriculture and
the Huskers are the rallying point. Much like the USA rallied around the
Olympic hockey team in 1980. Us Nebraska fans consider what has been
accomplished by the NU program as being VERY amazing when you consider
the very small population of the state and the northern proximity of the
state. There is even a highway named after the coach - the Osborne
Expresway. In short, we are proud as Hell of the Huskers - win or not.

I know where you are comming from. OU fans come into Lincoln and rub
our noses in it when they have beat Nu at Lincoln. Nu fans consider
OU fans bad winners just as CU fans consider Nu fans bad winners.
It's too bad because I believe that MOST NU and OU fans are not that
way. A few bad apples...

Nebraska Marty
27.514BSS::JCOTANCHGo Seahawks! Go Wolverines!Thu Sep 13 1990 13:5729
    IMO most of the dislike for NU is probably because of NU's great
    success over the last 20 years.  The Huskers have been a perrennial
    powerhouse year-in and year-out without being on probation or having a
    bad image like OU or Miami.  People love to talk about "Irish
    tradition" crap, but Nebraska has one of the nation's most successful
    programs on the field over the 2 decades.  ND had 2 consecutive losing
    seasons a few short years ago; Nebraska has won at least 9 games for 21
    consecutive years and is one of only of 2 division I-A teams to win 40
    games in the last 4 years (Miami is the other).  People like to
    bad-mouth Big Red fans, but they are very well behaved compared to
    other college fans around the country.  For the most NU fans are very
    gracious losers and are among the best at traveling with their team on
    the road.  I recall NU fans giving the Buffs a standing ovation after
    NU had a hard-fought 17-7 victory over CU at Lincoln in 1985, and also
    after NU lost to CU 20-10 in Boulder in 1986.
    
    We CU fans consider it a big achievement to beat a perrenial winner
    like Nebraska, especially after all those terrible seasons in the early
    80's.  Also, alot of the dislike for NU has been spawned by McCartney
    making NU their designated "red-letter game", which I think is great
    since CU really didn't have a rival or a game they point to every year. 
    I don't think NU fans should take it as personal or a vendetta against
    their team, but as a tribute to their success on the gridiron. 
    McCartney seems to have achieved his goal of making NU their big rival,
    because the Huskers are already shooting for the Buffs this year, and
    they don't meet until November 3rd. 
    
    Joe
       
27.515True Blue FansDENVER::HITEThu Sep 13 1990 14:1515
    re: marty;'s note of .513
    
    Marty, you are the kind of fan I am.  I love CU and will always love CU
    and will back my team always--win or lose.  That really is the easiest
    way for me to feel connected with the college that most of my family
    has attended for generations.
    
    But then there are the fans that are aggressive and are more motivated
    by humiliating the other team than by that love of their school and
    team.
    
    Sorry to sound so philosophical.  But I have run into a far too many of
    the latter type of fan--and usually they are dressed in RED
    
    Jan
27.516CuriousMILPND::VLASAKJust say NO...to Japan!Thu Sep 13 1990 16:146
    
    Anyone happen to have the scores of the Colorado-Nebraska and
    Colorado-Oklahoma games since 1962?  Thanks.
    
    Bob V.
    
27.517GENRAL::WADESittin' on the dock of the bay...Thu Sep 13 1990 16:5333
    
    Marty,
    
    	The first part of my reply wasn't directed at you.  It
    	was aimed at the NU fan who didn't feel CU fans had
    	any room in here because CU hasn't maintained a high
    	level of play for 20+ years.  
    
    	Your loyalty was never in question.  The statement
    	"Hey, that's great....."  should have read  "I think
    	I'm getting a cavity from being fed this sugar coated
    	drivel".
    
    	For the most part, I'd say most *fans* are well behaved.
    	NU fans hold no distinction in this category.  
    
    	I never despised NU until last year after the CU-NU game
    	was over and the comments about calls, best team, and
    	Aunese's death/fraud were made.  Then when you chimed
    	in with your Aunese comments, well, let's just say I felt
    	strongly that you were in no position to make those comments
    	and that it was sour grapes on your part (as well as the
    	newspaper writers in Nebraska).  I didn't see any ghosts
    	out on the field tackling NU ball carriers or running CU's
    	offense.  It irks me that some NU fans are so *arrogant* to
    	think that CU never would have had such a good season without
    	some sort of divine intervention.
    
    	FWIW, I admire Tom Osborne and his program.  I can also understand
    	the fanaticism for NU football now that you've explained some
    	of the reasons (as far as Nebraskans are concerned).
    
    	Claybone
27.518Bring on the Buffs Nov. 3...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Sep 13 1990 17:0811
re: -1

No doubt there is now bad blood between NU and CU from * BOTH * sides
of the spectrum. It's not going to get settled here and I'm not going
to get into it now.

All I can say is - I cant wait for November 3rd. I'm working on tickets
to the game in Lincoln and I would drive the 600 miles one way just to
be a part of the Husker atmosphere in Lincoln that day.

Nebraska Marty
27.519FSOA::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Thu Sep 13 1990 17:0921
    Claybone,
    
             I think your comments were directed at me.  What I meant in my
    note was that the CU fans are going a little overboard in their
    comments regarding NU and their schedule.  Any noter is welcome here
    but to jump all over someone was uncalled for.  BTW I thought you were
    an OSU fan.
    
    Re: Sal
    
             He was a leader who led by example, and who never gave up his
    fight.  He became a rallying cry not for adv. but because he was truly
    loved and respected.  The media took a personal tragedy and made it a 
    media show so you can not fault CU.  I hope that they keep the memory
    of Sal in their minds and make him part of the CU school tradition. 
    BTW don't the Bears wear the intials "GSH" on their sleeves as a
    reminder of Halas ?
    
    No bones with you Claybone,
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
27.520GENRAL::WADESittin' on the dock of the bay...Thu Sep 13 1990 17:1713
    John,
    
    	They were.  But they main culprit of NU schedule bashing
    	is Mr. Brown (aka Cadzilla).  He's one of them U. of
    	Texas fans from way back.........."only two things come
    	from Texas"  :^)  )
    
    	Me?  An OSU fan?  Heh, heh...no way.  My pap-inlaw is
    	an Okie and I have to listen to how good OU and OSU
    	are for 4-5 months every year.  Damn near killed him
    	when Switzer left........
    
    	Claybone
27.521FMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableThu Sep 13 1990 17:4625
    
    Thanks, Claywad
    
    	Yep you got it. I read the same BS about Sal and all the other
    crap flying round bout these two last year. Hope we don't have to read
    more of the same this year. NU's soft schedule will only effect them
    down the road when the Sooners come around. I don't think CU will be
    much of a test for them this year. From what I've seen of the
    Buttphaloes (tm) this year if they do not wake up soon they won't get
    past K.state.
    
    	Just my unbiased opinion!!
    
    Cadzilla
    
    PS
    
    Two things from Texas
    
    1. Running Back's (Earl Campbell,Billy Sims,Doak Walker,John David
    Crow,Donny Anderson,Thurman Thomas,TimBrown,MikeThomas,MercuryMorris,
    DuaneThomas,EricDickerson,CraigJames)
    
    2. Fastball Pitchers (NolanRyan,RogerClemens,GregSwindell,Monty
    Stratton)
27.522Diplomacy and Tact...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Sep 13 1990 17:4715
    I have proof positive that NU fans are more loyal than CU fans.
    
    When a Cu fan gets cut he/she does not bleed gold.
    
    When a NU fan gets cut he/she bleeds HUSKER RED !!!
    
    Yaaaa Ha, Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha, Haaaaaa Yeeaaaaa !!!
    
    By the way, lets get real. As it stands now this note is sort of a
    minor conflict between Cu and NU fans. If all of us REALLY noted
    in here what we all REALLY felt, this would be an all out WAR !!!
    
    Lets just call it "diplomatic nogotiations"    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.523FREMNT::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Sep 13 1990 19:0816
    Hey Clayboner, I'm sure you *meant* to say that it would 
    be a great honor to be an OSU fan.  Anyway, it pains me
    to say it but, for the BIG-8 champs, I'm picking the bad
    boys from Norman (who are trying to mend their ways).
    NU doesn't have the talent nor the schedule to be ready
    to compete with anyone above the Kansas' strengths and
    last year's CU team is gone.  Besides, CU doesn't seem
    to have a cause to fire them up--atleast not yet.  
    
    1st...OU
    2nd...NU
    3rd...CU
    4th...5-way tie (lets have a moment of silence and show
    	some respect for OSU who is nearly terminally ill)
    
    let the games continue....Cowboy
27.524CUDENVER::HITEThu Sep 13 1990 20:5910
    re .523
    
    Actually very few of last year's CU team is "gone".  I predict it will
    be
    
    		1st	Buffs	
    		2nd	Cornhuskers
    		3rd     Sooners
    
    Jan
27.525I LIKE CU BUFFSCSC32::LATOURTOUCH THIS !!!Thu Sep 13 1990 21:5713
    
    Let's see I predict,
    
    
         1st CU " LETS DO IT AGAIN BUFFS "
    
         2nd OU " OH IT FEELS SO GOOD TO BE HALF-WAY BACK SOONERS "
    
         3rd NU " NO! THIS DON'T FEEL RIGHT/ CAN'T BE RIGHT CORNHUSKERS "
    
    
    Drewski
    
27.526BIG RED of the North shall prevail...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Fri Sep 14 1990 13:1211
Now here's what will really happen. CU has lost it's edge, OU is much
improved but NU will win this thing with * D * E * F * E * N * S * E *

     1st   Nebraska   ! Back where they belong
     2nd   Colorado   ! Still in unfamiliar teratory
     3rd   Oklahoma   ! Oh so close to taking 2nd, would get a good bowl
                        if not for probation

Take this to the bank !!!

Nebraska Marty
27.527CU will be popping Champagne in ChampaignBSS::JCOTANCHGo Seahawks! Go Wolverines!Fri Sep 14 1990 18:3015
    CU takes on the Illini at Champaign tommorrow at 1:30 MDT.  The game is
    being carried on ABC, although it is only regional.  The Buffs are a
    3.5 point favorite.
    
    A good matchup if you look at the rankings, but both teams are
    struggling.  We know about CU's early season sputtering, and Illinois
    lost their opener to Arizona last Saturday.
    
    I think CU will have a good game tomorrow, although they may still have
    some problems adjusting in their passing game.  Defense appears to be
    coming together after a good outing against Stanford.
    
    CU by 13.
    
    Joe
27.528CU over IllinoisCURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UFri Sep 14 1990 20:109
    
    My prediction...
    
    CU        31
    Illinois  21
    
    
    
    Peace/ed
27.529What a difference a year...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Sep 17 1990 00:5014
    Heartbreaking loss for Cu by 1 point.
    
    All 3 CU games so far have been soooo close they could just as easily
    be 3-0 as they could be 0-3 as they are 1-1-1.
    
    Vulnurability to the pass still evident in CU's defense.
    
    OU looking VERY tough. Will the Big-8 return to normal this year with
    another NU and OU shootout for conference title ??? I dont think you
    can count CU out yet and Nebraska has LOADS of YOUNG talent.
    
    Stay tuned folks, this could get VERY interesting...
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.530SASE::SZABOMon Sep 17 1990 10:4313
    How long will OU be on probation?  I was watching a college football
    recap on the tube and the announcer mentioned that they cannot be
    ranked because of the probation.  In my Sunday morning paper, the was a
    "No. 14" next to Oklahoma.  I'm assuming that they can still be ranked
    but cannot participate in a bowl game, no?  If that's the case, what if
    they were that good to be ranked #1 at the end of the season going
    undefeated but can't get to the Your_name_goes_here Bowl, the one that
    usually "decides the national champion", but the #2 and #3 ranked teams
    play each other?  (I suppose the winner and loser would wind up 1 and 2
    with the previous #1 which didn't go to the almighty bowl winding up
    #3).
    
    Hawk
27.531Probation 'r UsCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleMon Sep 17 1990 12:037
    OU has 2 years remaining on their probation.
    
    UPI will not rank teams that are on probation.  AP will.
    
    OU cannot go to a bowl game but obviously can be on TV.
    
    Probation teams have won the AP championship in the past.
27.532QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Sep 17 1990 12:1716
   CU looks like penguin puckey!
   I'm from Illinois, so I managed to enjoy the game, but probably won't
   enjoy seeing CU beat by Nebraska and Oklahoma, which will surely happen
   if CU doesn't get it's act together. You have to bring something to a
   game besides last year's press clippings.

   Miami at California..... give me a break!
   Miami should be put on probation. Maybe even arrested for harboring
   escaped assholes. People like to rag on Notre Dame, but if Lou Holtz's
   players gave such a disgusting exhibition of poor sportsmanship, and
   acted like terminal jerk-offs, he'd have them riding the bench for the
   first performance, and off the team if they did it again.

   Virginia looks for real.

   Mike JN
27.533BSS::JCOTANCHJust Do It, SpartansMon Sep 17 1990 13:4531
    Didn't see the Miami-Cal game, but the Canes aren't the only ones who
    like to whoop it up.  The 'we're better then everybody' Irish were
    whooping it up pretty good when they got up on Michigan 14-3, but the
    Wolverines came back with 21 straight points and showed ND that they
    are far from unbeatable, even at home.  So the Miami players like to
    celebrate good plays and incite the crowd.  Watters was pumping his
    fist all night and urging on the crowd.  Part of the excitement and
    electricity of college football IMO.
    
    As for CU, it's time for the Buffs to stop thinking about national
    championships and big-time bowls and start playing the kind of football
    they're capable of.  They have excellent talent, and need to start
    focusing before they end up with 3 or 4 losses this year, which would
    be a big disappointment.  It doesn't get any easier with Texas at
    Austin this Saturday night.
    
    IMO, the problem with CU's offense is this incorporation of the passing
    game.  I know you NU fans probably think I'm crazy saying CU should
    give up this passing deal, but CU has the talent to run the ball 80% of
    the time in a game and win.  They did it last year, and look what OU did
    to a top-20 team on Saturday.  I think they only had about 70 yards passing.
    
    Speaking of OU, Holy Smokes!  I heard on the radio this morning that OU
    is ranked #11 in the new AP poll, which is a joke.  You know that the
    pollsters aren't giving the Sooners credit because they're on
    probation.  OU should be ranked in the top 5, and would kill Notre
    Shame if they played right now.  Michigan practically ran the ball at
    will against the Irish, and OU would have a field day.
    
    Joe   
        
27.534QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Sep 17 1990 14:1014
   Gimme a break Joe. I'm not talking about whooping it up, or shaking
   your fists in the air, or even a little endzone dance. I'm all for
   emotion and excitement. I'm talking about straddling a fallen opponent,
   shaking your finger in his face while laughing, and not allowing him
   to rise. I'm talking about ludicrous capers, bumps and grinds after
   every (usually pedestrian) catch. I'm talking about continued,
   repetetive (of course... they're not bright enough to think of anything
   original or creative) behavior that paints themselves, the team, and
   the entire school as a pack of sub human anal retentive sleazoids.

   As you may have guessed... Miami has rapidly become one of my least
   favorite teams.

   Mike JN
27.535RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe smell of burning leather as weMon Sep 17 1990 14:186
    Joe,  What Mike JN said - urging the crowd on is fine - pointing
    at opponents, hot dogging it, and that sh*t is what turned me off
    to the Canes - and they can thank JimmY Johnson for it.   I don't
    remember the Canes of pre Johnson doing that crap.  
    
    JD
27.536worth repeating after another week's games...POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Sep 17 1990 14:5919
  <<< Note 27.523 by FREMNT::REED "OklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling Championship" >>>

    Hey Clayboner, I'm sure you *meant* to say that it would 
    be a great honor to be an OSU fan.  Anyway, it pains me
    to say it but, for the BIG-8 champs, I'm picking the bad
    boys from Norman (who are trying to mend their ways).
    NU doesn't have the talent nor the schedule to be ready
    to compete with anyone above the Kansas' strengths and
    last year's CU team is gone.  Besides, CU doesn't seem
    to have a cause to fire them up--atleast not yet.  
    
    1st...OU
    2nd...NU
    3rd...CU
    4th...5-way tie (lets have a moment of silence and show
    	some respect for OSU who is nearly terminally ill)
    
    let the games continue....Cowboy
    
27.537Huskers celebrate...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Sep 17 1990 15:019
    re: last few
    
    It's the difference between celebrating and TAUNTING !!!
    
    Miami taunts
    
    ND celebrates
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.538Aggresive/Cheap Shot = Celebrating/TauntingHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERJail for the New Kids!Mon Sep 17 1990 16:026
    >It's the difference between celebrating and TAUNTING !!!
    
    The biggest difference between taunting and celebrating is the
    perception of the viewer, i.e. what team they play on/root for.
    
    Dan
27.539Mama don't 'low no OSU fans in here!GENRAL::WADEWhat you want? &lt;ooh&gt; Baby I got itMon Sep 17 1990 16:1219
    
    Sorry Cowgirl.  I sez what I means and I means what I sez.
    
    I will agree with your assessment of the final big 8 standings.
    Unless CU realizes that the football season has started and
    starts playing up to their potential, they'll finish 3rd and
    possibly 4th.  I also agree with whoever said that they don't
    need to throw for >2000 yds. this year to be successful.  Their
    main weapon is the run and it should stay that way until they
    find a QB who is a consistent passer.  They need to work on pass
    defense if anything.  I wonder if Coach Mac knows what cover 1
    means?  Their zone is too easy to break.  Pressure the QB and
    let the DBs go man to man.  
    
    CU has the horses to stop OU's running game.  But, OU is on
    a roll and is my pick for the *team to beat*.  CU does play
    them in Boulder so it will be interesting.
    
    Claybone
27.540RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe smell of burning leather as weMon Sep 17 1990 16:1212
    Dan,
    
    That's where you are clearly wrong.  Pointing fingers at an opponent,
    dangling the ball in there face, spitting at them is taunting -
    no matter who does it.   When LT goes into his pistol shooting act,
    that's showboating and taunting and I don't like it.  Celebrating
    or raising one's hands to get the crowd cheering is not taunting,
    and IMO, there is nothing wrong with it.  Cortez Kennedy did it
    last year and it was fine.  Gyrating like a sick Revere hooker is
    taunting.
    
    JD
27.541CURIOUSMILPND::VLASAKJust say NO...to Japan!Mon Sep 17 1990 16:3010
RE .536
    
    Cowboy, if, "NU doesn't have the talent nor the schedule to be ready
    to compete with anyone above the Kansas' strengths", how do you
    come up with this?
    
    "1st...OU
     2nd...NU
     3rd...CU"
    
27.542FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Sep 17 1990 16:404
    I'm a fan of neither Miami or ND, but I can tell the difference.  Miami
    taunts.  ND celebrates.
    
    John
27.543CAM::WAYLookin' for drool next week...Mon Sep 17 1990 16:4417
Actually, I hate that stupid no taunting rule.  Even though I'm in 
a note pertaining to college football, I'll say that the NFL rule
is stupid. 

If a team wants to celebrate, they should be able to.  They should be
able to jump up and down, do cartwheels, flips -- in short anything
and everything they can and want to do within the guideline for 
getting a NEA grant -- as long as they do it within the prescribed
amount of time for getting the next play off so they don't delay the
game.

There is no person in the world that can tell what's taunting or
what's celebrating, unless perhaps he stands next to the player
who's just sacked the qb and hears him say "In your face, you pansy".
But even that's part of the game.....

'Saw
27.544Dance, Little Sister, danceHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERNuke the New Kids!!Mon Sep 17 1990 18:167
    >That's where you are clearly wrong. 
    
    I respect your opinion JD, but there is nothing clear about it.  There
    is a very fine line between cheering for your good fortune and the
    other team's misfortune, and I'm not gonna draw it.
    
    Dan
27.545just reaching a bit...POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Sep 17 1990 18:4715
    >Cowboy, if, "NU doesn't have the talent nor the schedule to be ready
    >to compete with anyone above the Kansas' strengths", how do you
    >come up with this?
    
    >"1st...OU
    > 2nd...NU
    > 3rd...CU"
    
    O.K. so I was getting carried away, but I *do* think that NU better
    keep their minds on some of the other BIG-8 teams, tho.  It wouldn't
    surprise me at all to see Iowa State or Kansas State upset them this
    year.  These teams are starting to play respectable ball.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.546...but it's a long season...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Sep 17 1990 19:1842
    The distance between NU, OU, CU and the rest of the big-8 is HUGE.
    
    Upsets can happen at any time but I for one consider that the 3
    teams mentioned above would all have to have a VERY off day to loose
    to any big-8 team but the other 2 biggies.
    
    OU this year is scarry for sure. I also think that NU is underestimated
    (Not in the polls but by the noters in this note). They are young but
    loaded with talent and speed. NU has been trying to convert from power
    to speed for years and now it looks like they are starting to achieve
    their goal. NU will have time to mature offensively by the time they
    run into another real good team (Yea I know the schedule does stink)
    and I think they will be ready.
    
    With CU at NU, OU at CU and NU at OU this will be VERY interesting.
    
    If the above mentioned games were played right now I would predict:
    
    	1st   OU
        2nd   NU
        3rd   CU
    
    However, these games are not played for about 7 weeks or so. Therefore
    here is my final prediction:
    
    	1st   NU
        2nd   OU
        3rd   CU
    
    Thing return back to normal in the Big-8.
    
    WHAT, did you actually expect me to predict Nebraska NOT to win the
    BIG-8 ?????? You should know better than that. I'm WAY too biased
    to NOT pick the Big Red of the North !!!!!!
    
      GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED
      GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED
      GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED
      GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED
      GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED GO BIG RED
    
Nebraska Marty
27.547Why do you have NU at the top???FREMNT::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Sep 17 1990 19:4311
    Hey NM, if you are expecting the teams to end up in their normal
    positions:
    
    1..OU
    2..NU
    3..OSU
    4..MU
    5..CU
    6..ISU
    7..KU
    8..KSU
27.548"Normal" with a small adjustment...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Sep 17 1990 20:0246
    Cowboy,
    
    Good point !!! Your right. But what I meant by "normal" was the 1st
    and 2nd positions being occupied by the "Big-2" Nebraska/Oklahoma.
    
    Last year was the 1st year in 20 years that that did not happen.
    
    By the way, did you know that Nebraska and Oklahoma are 5-5 against
    each other in the '80s ???
    
    	'80  Okies won
    	'81  Huskers won
    	'82  Huskers won
    	'83  Huskers won
    	'84  Okies won
    	'85  Okies won
    	'86  Okies won
    	'87  Okies won
    	'88  Huskers won
    	'89  Huskers won
    
    By the way, regarding the disussion about CU and the passing game.
    I agree that CU plays best and is competitive when it runs 90% or
    so of the time. But this will not achieve a national championship
    in the current scheme of things. True, running primarily, they can
    win 9 or 10 games a year and challenge for Big-8 championship. But
    the '80s have shown that, for the most part, have belonged to the
    pro-set passing teams.
    
    Look at the Nebraska teams of '82 and '83 and some of the great Oklahoma
    teams of the '80s, there teams did not beat a Miami team in the '80s.
    And the whole world agreed that in '83 Nebraska was the better team.
    But Kosars passing game won it. Same against Oklahoma.
    
    Thats why I talk about why Osborne at Nebraska needs to throw out
    of his sets more. If things continue at NU as they have been, then
    Nu will continue its 9 or 10 win top-10 season with close losses
    on bowl-day to passing teams. (I realize last years FSU game was not
    close, but thats the ONLY bowl Nu has EVER been blown out of big time).
    
    I think that as long as CU has Hagan at QB they should concentrate on
    the run but they should recruit a passing QB. I havent seen Grant and
    Joseph at NU much but Grant looks like he has a nice passing touch.
    Hope he develops.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.5491986: CU 20, NU 10BSS::JCOTANCHJust Do It, SpartansMon Sep 17 1990 20:3013
    
>    Good point !!! Your right. But what I meant by "normal" was the 1st
>    and 2nd positions being occupied by the "Big-2" Nebraska/Oklahoma.
    
>    Last year was the 1st year in 20 years that that did not happen.
    
     Not quite, Marty.  The 1986 final Big-8 standings looked like this:

     OU  7-0
     CU  6-1
     NU  5-2

Joe
27.550FREMNT::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Sep 17 1990 20:5024
    Yeah, CU probably needed to pass the ball to win the National
    Championship--but not with Hagan doing the throwing.  CU's
    only chance at all the marbles was to go with the run.  Now
    they will have to fight to stay in the top 10.
    
    I have to put the blame on coach Mac's stubbornness to stick
    with an idea (or dream) when its too unlikely that it can
    be fulfilled.  Take his "dream" at the end of last season.
    It became obvious that CU needs to be able to pass the ball
    to beat the top teams.  It should have been obvious last
    season that Hagan would not be an instant passing QB by the
    next season.
    
    Mac made a similar mistake a couple years ago against OSU.
    He had made the statement just before the game that he
    didn't want to run on every first down--he didn't want the
    OSU defense to be waiting for the run.  That definitely
    makes sense but what CU ended up doing was passing on
    nearly every first down play!  They only completed 2 or
    3 and of those 1 or 2 turned into fumbles and then points
    for OSU.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.551who still to this day can't believe they were 17 point underdogsCNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Sep 18 1990 10:278
 Gee, I must live on Planet Claire cause I knew it going in and was proven
 right that Miami was the better team in 83. Sure NU was great team but
 Miami had both a running game and passing game and NU lacked the passing.

 ;^)

 mike
27.552FSU/MiamiFRAGLE::JTSTue Sep 18 1990 12:0512
    re .551
    
    The only reasons Miami won in '83 was because they were playing at home
    and because Osborne went for two.  
    
    Miami National Champs?  No way!  At best they were 49-state Champs,
    'cause they weren't Florida State Champs!
    
    FSU 
    
    
     
27.553But they could pass AND run...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 18 1990 12:1841
    re: .551
    
    Your statement is partialy correct, at least the way I see it.
    
    That Nebraska team was one of the Huskers best passing teams. They 
    had Irving Fryar and another good wingback, I cant think of his name
    now, I think Brown. Anyway the QB was Turner Gill who was too small
    for the NFL but went to the CFL and was the leading passer in the
    league for a few years before being retired by several concusions.
    The whole offensive line went on to the NFL and some are still playing.
    
    They also had Heisman winner Rozier (who was one of the NFL's leading
    rushers a few years ago) and the 49ers Rathman.
    
    That was one thing that made them so good, they COULD BOTH pass and
    run. Maybee you will recall the pass that Gill hit Fryar with in the
    Miami end zone. Perfect pass and Fryar just droped it.
    
    No, I disagree, Miami did win the game and they were brilliant
    (especialy Kosar) but Nebraska did have the best team. Remember, the
    game was played at Miami's home field, the song "Hurracain Warning"
    was played over the PA system, when Fryar dropped the ball there were
    2 "Orange bowl officials" dressed in official Orange bowl jackets
    jumping up and down celebrating.
    
    This was an impartial bowl ???  B.S. Play the game at Nebraska with the
    sea of red and I would have been different. Or even on a neutral field
    and Nu would have won 8 out of 10 that year from Miami. Schellenberger
    even said in recent interviews that it was a MAJOR upset.
    
    In the 4th quarter Nebraska, down by 14, just bowled over Miami. In
    Osbornes book "More Than Winning" he states that NU was by far the
    strongest team in the 4th quarter of that game. Miami was VERY
    fortunate to hold on. They won by a missed 2 point conversion. And
    remember, Nebraska COULD have kicked the extra point and won the
    national championship.
    
    Big Red of '83
    The BEST that will ever BE
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.554CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Sep 18 1990 12:4623
 Well I don't exactly recall Turner Gill being all that great a passer.
 Given the wider fields and motion all over the place I don't find it
 surprising that he could go up to Canada and lead the league. Wasn't he
 also a prospect as a baseball pitcher? Irving Fryar was then is now and
 forever shall be one the most overrated, wasted gifts of talent I have seen.
 Given that Miami was a 17 point underdog yes it was an upset but I didn't
 see it that way. Miami had pounded OU, ND and others earlier in the year
 and I figured that they're brand of offense would be too much for NU.

 As far as the comeback goes how many times do we see both pro and college
 team blow big lead by down shifting into protect the ball eat the clock
 and play prevent on defense? Why if Miami had stayed aggressive the score
 porbably would have been 40 to 14...

 I do applaud Osboune for going for the win. This is college, they're not
 playing for money so you should always go for the win. Ties are like kissing
 your sister. I'd rather loose by a point and have the satisfaction of knowing
 my team was man enough to go for it than walk away with the empty feeling a
 tie leaves.....

 mike

27.555EARRTH::BROOKSI can make it 'mo better ....Tue Sep 18 1990 12:5720
    Mike, Gill was a great passer - one of the best option passers I had
    ever seen, and in fcat matched Bernie pass for pass in that game
    (taking into account Bernie threw a lot more. Gill went to the CFL,
    didn't do too badly, but had a problem with concussions (he had 3 in
    one season). Doctors told him to retire, and he did. Last I heard, he
    went into the Indians' farm system as a SS, but was at least 3 years
    ago.
    
    As for Fryar, I think he has matured a lot in the last few years, but
    he's on the wrong team to take advantage of his talents. Believe me, if
    the Pats wanted to trade him, there would be no dearth of buyers.
    
    If the Pats ever get Irving the ball 50 times in a season, look out.
    
    As that Orange Bowl, it still ranks as the best college game I've ever
    seen. I strongly believe that bowl games should have an OT. That was
    the wrong situation to force a team to go for two. And I did, and still
    do support Osborne's decision. That was one hell of a game.
    
    drM
27.556Who beat Penn State in '82 ???BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 18 1990 13:2039
    Regarding this, I will give you that the Miami teams since '83
    were better than Nebraska. I'm just saying that the '83 Miami
    team was not a better team than Nebraska of that year.
    
    One interesting thing about that '83 Husker team. After Nu beat
    OU in '83, Switzer said that he thought that the '82 Husker team
    was better than the '83 team. The '82 team had everybody list
    in previous notes PLUS Roger Craig. And we all know how good Craig
    is.
    
    The '82 squad won the Orange bowl but lost AT Penn State in the last
    min. of the game. That '82 NU Penn state game was also a fantastic
    game. That was the year that the Penn state had 2, not 1 but 2, very
    controversial catches in the final drive.
    
    Now here is another knock on the rating system. Osborne alluded to this
    in his bood "More Than Winning." Penn State barely beat Nebraska early
    in the '82 season. Penn State had a loss to someone else (Anyone know
    who?) fairly late in the '82 season. These were the only 2 losses for
    both teams.
    
    Factors:
    
    	Penn State beat NU
    	Nebraska loss was an early season loss
    	Penn State had a late season loss
    
    We all know about the late and early season loss krap that influences
    the ratings. Penn State ended up #1 and Nu #2. It really could have
    gone either way. Just a little nit pick.
    
    Never, never, never has a team been so good for 2 years in a row and
    come sssooooooooooooo close to #1 both years and miss by such a small
    margin as Nebraska did those 2 years. It could have just as easily been
    back to back for NU as it was #2 for 2 years. Colorado fans, you dont
    know what close is. Last year you were close to it. But not as close as
    Nu in '82 and '83. Frustrating, but thats life. And it is only a game.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.557QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Sep 18 1990 13:2523
27.558Panthers ???SHALOT::HUNTWyld Stallyns RulesTue Sep 18 1990 13:458
    I don't recall who handed Penn State a loss late in the 1982 season but
    I would guess it was Pitt with Dan Marino at quarterback.
    
    Penn State went on to win the Sugar Bowl and the national championship
    on 1-Jan-1983 over Georgia, I believe.   Herschel Walker's last game
    before he headed for the USFL.
    
    Bob Hunt
27.559AP and UPI, what a crockCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleTue Sep 18 1990 13:5235
    
    Ah yes, the 1983 season, remember it well.
    
    Going into the bowl games, the polls were:
    
    1) Nebraska (11-0)
    2) Texas    (11-0)
    3) Auburn   (10-1 with wins over Georgia and Florida and an opening
                      game loss to Texas)
    4) Iowa     (10-1)
    5) Miami    (10-1 with an opening day 35-3 loss to Florida(you
                      remember Florida, the team that was beaten by Auburn)
    
    So we have the bowl games:
    
    Miami beats Nebraska 31-30 in the Orange Bowl
    Georgia(who lost to Auburn) beats Texas 10-9 in the Cotton Bowl
    Iowa(as usual for the big ten) loses in the Rose Bowl
    Auburn beats Michigan 9-7 in the Sugar Bowl(remember the SEC champion
    is tied to the Sugar Bowl so they had no choice of opponent)
    
    Seems reasonable to me that Auburn would win the national championship
    since they were the highest ranked team that won and since they played
    the toughest schedule in the nation and beat both Florida and Georgia.
    But no, in their infinite wisdom, the UPI and AP final polls were:
    
    1) Miami
    2) Nebraska(so much for late season losses counting for more than early
                season losses)
    3) Auburn(didn't even change positions)
    
    The '83 and '84 seasons(BYU winning the national championship by
    beating a 6-5 Michigan team by a couple of points) cost the UPI and AP
    any credibility they may have had...
    
27.560Take those little red glasses off!GENRAL::WADEWhat you want? &lt;ooh&gt; Baby I got itTue Sep 18 1990 14:0130
Marty,

>    The '82 squad won the Orange bowl but lost AT Penn State in the last
>    min. of the game. That '82 NU Penn state game was also a fantastic
>    game. That was the year that the Penn state had 2, not 1 but 2, very
>    controversial catches in the final drive.
    
	This is what I was talking about a few notes back.  Let me ask
	you something.  Has anybody EVER beat NU decisively (in your
	honest opinion of course) ?  Has anybody ever beat NU without
	divine intervention or massive help from the referees or without
	luck?  Please, enlighten us.

>    Never, never, never has a team been so good for 2 years in a row and
>    come sssooooooooooooo close to #1 both years and miss by such a small
>    margin as Nebraska did those 2 years. It could have just as easily been
>    back to back for NU as it was #2 for 2 years. 

	Are these excellent losses (tm)?  


>   Colorado fans, you dont
>    know what close is. Last year you were close to it. But not as close as
>    Nu in '82 and '83. Frustrating, but thats life. And it is only a game.
 
	Now why would you single out Colorado fans?  We were close to
	being close eh?  I'd say one or two blown first half scoring
	opportunities in the Orange bowl is close.

Claybone
27.561ah two birds with one stone got to love it ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Sep 18 1990 14:1010
>	Now why would you single out Colorado fans?  We were close to
>	being close eh?  I'd say one or two blown first half scoring
>	opportunities in the Orange bowl is close.

  Well Claybone, I said the simple fact of the matter was that CU was playing
  ND not Miami who was clearly a better team than ND so you weren't as close.
  Hell FSU was a better squad than ND and CU last year also..

mike
27.562NU has had it handed to them...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 18 1990 14:3929
    re: Claybone
    
>                     ...Has anybody EVER beat NU decisively (in your
>	honest opinion of course) ?  Has anybody ever beat NU without
>	divine intervention or massive help from the referees or without
>	luck?  Please, enlighten us.

    Of course Nu has had some pure losses. FSU last year, Miami in the
    Orange Bowl a couple of years back, Oklahoma games have been close
    almost every year but there have been a few years where OU handed
    it to us on a platter. UCLA beat NU bad 1 time in the '80s. It dosent
    happen often but there have been times when NU has been soundly beaten.
    
 
>	Now why would you single out Colorado fans?  We were close to
>	being close eh?  I'd say one or two blown first half scoring
>	opportunities in the Orange bowl is close.
    
    Only reason I mentioned it was because this is the Big-8 conference
    and CU is comming off last years Orange Bowl game real close to a
    national championship. I'm just saying that NU has done that many
    times and a missed 2 point conversion and a last second Penn State
    drive are closer losses than being behind the whole second half
    and losing by, hmmmm, I dont remember what the Cu ND score was???
    Was it 7 or 10 points? 
    
    A bit nit-pickey yes.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.563EARRTH::BROOKSI can make it 'mo better ....Tue Sep 18 1990 14:548
    re .560
    
    Wade, Marty was right. The Penn State game was so infamous that I
    remember a T-shirt that the game inspired. It had a fooball field on it
    that had an extended sideline in one spot (where a Penn State player
    made a catch at least 2 feet out of bounds, but was allowed), and a
    funny endzone as well (I believe the winning TD was out of the back of
    the end zone).
27.564GENRAL::WADEWhat you want? &lt;ooh&gt; Baby I got itTue Sep 18 1990 15:1014
    
    Mike,
    
    	In terms of the way college teams are ranked, ND was the better
    	choice than Miami or FSU......regardless of who was playing
    	better ball in December.  Hey!  I know!  Let's start a playoff
    	system like the NCAA has in every(?) single other sport!  
    
    Marty,
    
    	Well alright!  There are one or two objective bones in your
    	bugeater body!
    
    Claybone
27.565Go Big Bugeaters, Bo Big Bugeaters...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 18 1990 15:167
    re: Claybone
    
    I'm a Bugeater through and through !!!!
    
    Ya haaaa ha, ha ha ha, yeaaaa.
    
    Bugeater Marty
27.566Sad, but True!MILPND::VLASAKJust say NO...to Japan!Tue Sep 18 1990 15:1728
    re .563
    
    The P.State field diagram included the two spots where P.State was
    given a call by the same ref, who, believe it or not was a cousin
    of Coach Paterno!
    
    One was an out of bounds pass by P.State against NU that was called in
    and the other was an inbound end zone pass by 'Bama that was call out!
    
    The diagram was something like the following:
    
    
                                 P.State field layout
    
                   _____________________________________________
                  |                                            |
                  |_                                           |
    'Bama catch ->  |                                          |
                  |-                                           |
                  |                                            |
                  |                                            |
                  |                                            |
                   -------  -----------------------------------
                         |__| <- P.State catch
    
    
    P.State should have had two loses, instead were "National Champs"
    
27.567No controversy in the polls 1982-83...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 18 1990 19:0236
    
    Such distortion of facts...
    
    First of all, in the Penn State-Nebraska opener in 1982, only the first
    call was an out-of-bounds play, and yes, it was questionable.  I'm not
    exactly sure what down the play came on, and therefore its effect on
    the outcome of the game.  The second call was in the end zone, but was
    a catch/trap call for the tight end.  It sure looked like a good catch 
    to me.  At the very least he pulled the ball in under his body and if
    he dropped it there's no way anyone would be able to see it.  (What was 
    that guy's name?  Bowman?  Bauer?  Something like that.)
    
    Penn State was beat by Alabama that year, 42-21, in mid-season.  The
    reason there wasn't much doubt that they deserved the National
    Championship that year (under the de facto guidelines of the system)
    is that 1) they beat Nebraska head-to-head, and 2) they played and beat
    undefeated and untied Georgia in the Sugar Bowl while Nebraska came up
    with their usual lackluster Orange Bowl effort in defeating only a
    fair LSU team (9-2-1 coming in) by the less-than-overwhelming score of
    21-20.  Even in Lincoln, I don't believe there was outrage over this
    one.  (By the way, SMU was voted number 2 over Nebraska).
    
    The same criteria apply to Miami's championship in 1983.  Auburn had no
    case after taking out 9-2 Michigan in a 9-7 yawner.  Nebraska was a
    powerhouse like no one had seen in years and were upset by an
    up-and-coming Miami.  There was zero doubt in the minds of the voters.
    Auburn didn't even finish second, and rightly so.  (Also, I don't 
    believe that Miami ever beat Oklahoma behind Kosar.  I'm pretty sure 
    there were only the two regular season victories behind Testaverde and 
    the Orange Bowl win behind Walsh.  I think Miami beat Penn State that 
    year, but then again everyone did, including a revenge thrashing by 
    Nebraska in the Kickoff Classic the likes of which Joe Paterno has 
    never experienced before or since.)
    
    glenn

27.568It was in consecutive seasons...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 18 1990 19:1017
    re: last few
    
    T-shirt. The Nebraska game of '82 had a 3rd or 4th down play in Penn
    States winning last min. drive on the left sideline. Replays showed
    he was clearly out. It depends on which down it was. If 3rd down then
    State would have another chance if the call were made correct. If 4th
    down then the call did blow the game. Anybody remember which down it
    was ???
    
    The Other part of the t-shirt represented the Alabama game which was
    played the following year. That's the end zone thing. But he was right
    about the fact that it was the SAME ref.
    
    Good job Glenn, man you remembered your facts well.
    My whole point in this is how %$&*^$ing close NU can 2 straight years.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.569BSCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleTue Sep 18 1990 21:409
    re .567
    
    So, you are saying that you are only as good as your last game?  It
    doesn't matter that Auburn had the toughest schedule in the nation and
    that they beat Georgia and Florida and that there loss was the first
    game of the season?  They were only as good as their 9-7 win over
    Michigan?  A 1 point win in a game where 61 points is scored is less
    convincing to me than a 2 point win in a game where 16 points are
    scored...
27.570BS, my footDELNI::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 19 1990 11:0330
    
    As far as I was concerned, the team that played and beat Nebraska in
    1983 had the "toughest" schedule.  Yes, Georgia, Florida, and Texas
    were all excellent that year, but Nebraska was head and shoulders over
    anyone, probably the best all-around team of the decade.  Their average
    margin of victory was 52-16 coming into the Orange Bowl, and it didn't
    come against the kind of patsy schedule they're playing now.
    
    Go back and research it if you're interested.  Go ask the experts. 
    Hell, ask Marty, he'll tell you.
    
    The worst part of it, I'll admit, is that Auburn never even had the
    opportunity to take on Nebraska because of the conference commitments,
    and they ended up playing a poor game against a mediocre opponent known
    for regularly losing in the bowls.  But I don't think they'd have
    touched Nebraska.  Miami won the only way possible, via the pass.  They
    indeed were a more worthy opponent.  Who was Auburn's quarterback in 
    1983?
    
    No, I do not come to this conclusion based on one game.  Auburn was
    most definitely not screwed in the polls in 1983.
    
    If you want real controversy, look at Notre Dame over Alabama in 1977, 
    USC over Alabama in 1978 (UPI only; maybe the most illogical voting in 
    my time following college football), or BYU in 1984.  The rest of them
    were pretty reasonable decisions.
    
    glenn
     
    
27.571Back to Big 8 sportsCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleWed Sep 19 1990 13:3417
    
    I don't buy that crap about Nebraska being so awesome.  If they were as
    good as you say, then Miami would not have beaten them.
    
    Of course, it doesn't really matter what we think.  Division 1A
    football will not have a true national champion until they go to a
    playoff system.  The next best thing would be to sever all
    conference/bowl tie-ins so that the best teams can play each other.
    
    Anyway, to get back to Big 8 Sports.  If OU wins the Big 8, does the
    Orange Bowl have to take another Big 8 team or can they take anyone? 
    It seems that if the Orange Bowl is tied to the Big 8 champion and that
    team is not eligible for a bowl then all tie-ins are off.
    
    BTW, the Auburn quarterback in '83 was Randy Campbell.  Of course, AU
    ran the wishbone that year so the quarterback would not be that well
    known...
27.572TRADITION: NU vs ND in Orange Bowl ???BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 19 1990 13:5414
    John, even though you are an Auburn fan I'll reply to your note
    anyway. And by the way, Nebraska WAS THAT awesome in '83.
    
    My understanding is that IF OU wins the Big-8 outright, then they 
    are NOT obligated by contract to invite the Big-8 runner up. They
    could invite anyone they want. This would be to the Orange bowls
    advantage IF the Big-8 second place team is NOT in the thick of it
    for a national championship.
    
    However I am not sure about this. Anyone know for sure ???
    Of course, this is all water under the bridge because Nebraska IS
    going to win the Big-8.   ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.573EARRTH::BROOKSI can make it 'mo better ....Wed Sep 19 1990 15:333
    re .568
    
    Hey Marty, I deserve an assist !
27.574FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Wed Sep 19 1990 16:177
    Regarding Turner Gill.  His wife is attending North Texas State
    University and apperently Gill is helping out with NTSU football
    team, or something of that sort.
    
    HTH,
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
27.575Big Red Fans - UNITE !!!BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 19 1990 17:179
    re: .573
    
    Alright !!! Good job. I wish more of the Husker fans on the net - 
    AND YOU KNOW WHO YOU ARE - would get in here and back the cause.
    Hey Brooks, you can take the lead in here for me if you want all
    the guff that goes with it !!   ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
    
27.576big 1 med 1 little 6FMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableWed Sep 19 1990 17:3814
    re-570
    
    	Patsy Schedule:
    
      They had to play seven Little 8 schools did'nt they. That left 6
    patsy's and OU. Get real would you, till the Cornholers get a real
    schedule outside of OU they will still have those great records.
    
    FWIW, I'm not knocking nu or dr tom. he has a great program, but in the
    past twenty years I've watched them blow many of the Big One's because
    they did not play the tougher schools in the country during the
    year.
    
    Cadzilla
27.577Cant help what conference your in...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 19 1990 17:538
    re: -1
    
    Are UCLA, Auburn, LSU, FSU, Penn State, Oklahoma amoung others
    patsys ???
    
    Nebraska has blown away all these teams at one point or another.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.578FMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableWed Sep 19 1990 18:0411
    
    Re-1
    
     Out of a 11 game schedule how many of those did they play in one year
    outside of OU. 1 yr Penn st, Next year UCLA ,three tough games a year
    does not impress. As I said, im Not knocking Nu they usally get one 
    good team every ten years. 72-73, (Johnny Rogers ,Rich Glover, Tagge?)
    82-83 (Fryar,Gill, Stienkuler) but to many times I've pulled for them to 
    beat OU AND THEY HAVE NOT COME THROUGH!!
    
    Cadzilla
27.579Guess Again Anti-Husker Breath...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 19 1990 18:2416
    re: -1
    
    Most years they have had 2 strong teams and 2 "patsy's"in the
    pre-conference schedule. If you look at most teams schedules
    (non-independent) this is a pattern that is quite common.
    There are acceptions.
    
    You will find that most everyone has their "Patsy State" type of
    schools on their schedules. This does serve some purpose. It is a
    benefit to the "Patsy States" of the world. Even though they get
    beat 55-3 it goes get them some exposure, not to mention $$$$$$$
    
    This (and last) years Husker schedule is different though. Were talking
    4 "Patsy State's" on the pre-Big-8 schedule. Not good.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.580MILPND::VLASAKJust say NO...to Japan!Wed Sep 19 1990 18:259
    re .578
    
              Just happen to have a 1981 schedule handy!
    
              Sep 12   Iowa
              Sep 19   Florida State
              Sep 26   Penn State
              Oct  3   Auburn
    
27.581Sooners play five usual Top 20 opponents this year...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 19 1990 18:2527
    
    I agree one hundred percent, Cadzilla, but 1983 was an extraordinary
    year.  Nebraska started it with a shellacking of defending national
    champs Penn State, another of my favorites, by a score of (I believe)
    44-6.  In general, the schedule does hurt Nebraska come bowl time and
    their poor record shows it.  This year is another example.  No way, at
    this particular moment in time, should Nebraska be rated ahead of
    Oklahoma.  But I'm not complaining because they'll meet head-to-head
    later anyway, and early-season polls are meaningless.
    
    Oklahoma is currently (over)ranked at #1 on the USA Today Computer
    Poll.  Again, very little data is yet available, but having stomped two
    very worthy opponents shows up in an objective (albeit imperfect)
    system.  Regarding previous notes, Oklahoma is ineligible for
    post-season play this year, but while still on limited probation next
    year (reduced scholarships?) they *are* eligible for the bowls in 1991,
    and I believe the UPI coaches' poll also.  Also, if the AP writers are
    honest (even though the Sooners weren't), they can take the AP National
    Championship this year.  They did this before, in 1974, when they
    finished as the only undefeated team in the country.  It remains to be
    seen what tendencies the writers would show this year, but my guess is 
    that question will become academic.  I still think it's a bit ambitious 
    to believe that OU will knock off Texas, Nebraska *and* Colorado.  Of
    course, I'd take Nebraska's butt over any of them.
    
    glenn
       
27.582FSHQA2::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Wed Sep 19 1990 18:306
    Wasn't Nebraska on the cover of TIME magazine that year as one of the
    best football teams ever ?
    
    Go Big Red !!!!
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
27.583What time is it?FMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableWed Sep 19 1990 18:375
    
    What the Hell does time mag know about football, or any other sport for
    that matter?
    
    Cadzilla 
27.584Big-8 is Weak...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 19 1990 18:4915
    re: Weak schedule hurts come bowl time
    
    I see the point and it has validity. But remember, The final 7 games
    of the season are Big-8 games. The FIRST 4 games are non-conference.
    This is more of a reflection on the WEAK BIG-8.
    
    Nebraska has no control over how weak the Big-8 is other than the fact
    that NU and OU make the other teams look bad and thus hurt recruiting
    for the little 6. (I include Colorado because we are talking about many
    years before the last one or 2)
    
    Also, the Oklahoma game is the last game before the bowl every year.
    I think a bigger factor is Nebraska's one-dimentionality.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.585It was the SI jinx...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Sep 19 1990 18:5711
    I dont know about TIME, but Sport Illustrated gave Nebraska the
    anual "SI jinx", as it is commenly refered to, by hailing the
    '83 Huskers as the best football team in the history of College
    football.
    
    All these questions about who played who what year and what the scores
    were. There has to be some kind of Big-8 or College football yearbook
    published which has all these stats. Anyone have one? Maybee if I get
    time I'll stop by a bookstore.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.586exFMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableWed Sep 19 1990 19:1513
    I don't know a best ever. Bud Wilkerson's Ou 55-0 team of the late 50's
    has to rank up there some where, Along the Glen Davis,Doc Blanchard's
    Army team of the 40's. oop's Forgot Rockne's ND team of the 20's
    The Sixties had Texas, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Alabama, So.Cal, and Syracuse
    no real (Damn V.N. War) dominance.
    
    Cadzilla
    
    P.S.
    
    Anybody in here ever strap on what they used to call the Oklahoma
    helment? It was a site. All of these weird angles, not your basic
    Riddell.  
27.587Back to the 60'sFMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableThu Sep 20 1990 11:5910
    
    Re-1
    
      Forgot One
    
    
    	U of Texas Longhorns went 30-0 in the late 60's Nat'l champ's in 69 
    
    Cadzilla
    
27.588Slight NitNUTMEG::STEVENSONFri Sep 21 1990 13:466
    re.: .587
    
    Texas went 33-0!  During the streak, Texas Tech was the last team they
    lost to and Notre Dame was the next team they lost to 3 years later in
    the Cotton Bowl. (Which was a repeat of the Cotton Bowl from the
    previous yet, which was ND's first Bowl appearance in n years.
27.589Did CU win?CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UMon Sep 24 1990 12:5512
    
    Does anyone know the score of the CU-Texas game?
    Also does anyone know the score of the USC-Washington game?
    
    Washington plays in Boulder next week I believe...
    
    The Boston Globe that I got didn't have these scores...
    
    
    Thanks,
    
    Peace/ed
27.590FMCSSE::BROWNPlug to Plug CombustableMon Sep 24 1990 13:075
    
    cu 29 ut 22
    
    uw 31 usc zip
    
27.591Close games for CU all year long...CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UMon Sep 24 1990 13:4215
    
    re .590
    
    Thanks for the scores.  I can't believe Washington creamed USC that
    badly.  CU has one incredibly tough schedule this year.  I wonder what
    the point spread will be for the CU-Washington game.  It may be the
    first time this year that CU is favored to win this year...
    
    Peace/ed
    
    p.s.  Did anyone see the CU-Texas game.  Was the score indicative of
    the game?  Did CU take a big lead and almost lose it, was it pretty
    close the whole game or did CU actually come back on a team (like the 
    CU-Stanford game?)
    
27.592Mistake...CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UMon Sep 24 1990 13:437
    
    re -.1
    
    That should read ---it may be the first time that CU is NOT favored
    to win....
    
    Peace/ed
27.593close and then...HBAHBA::HAASsame as talking to youMon Sep 24 1990 14:5411
Texas coulda/shoulda won the game but lost in the closing minutes. The
last 2 scores were the TD by Colorado and a safety with about 29 seconds
left.

The safety was a point of interest to many people watching the game as it
made the final difference 7, instead of 5 and the line was 6 1/2.

The other notable aspect of the game was how well Colorado passed. Where
has this been during the first 3 games?

TTom
27.594CU 29, Texas 22BSS::JCOTANCHTheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11Mon Sep 24 1990 16:2729
    Here's a quick overview of the CU-UT game:
    
    CU led 14-13 at halftime, and the Buffs had 2 fumbles which led to 10
    points for Texas.  The 3rd quarter was very strange.  CU got the
    2nd-half kickoff but couldn't get a first down and punted.  Texas had a
    long drive and went ahead 19-14 after missing the 2-point conversion. 
    Then, UT tried an onside kick (which apparently was not
    intentional) and recovered at the CU 41 yard line.  CU then proceeded
    to hold Texas, but after a 3rd-down completion that left UT short of a
    first down, CU got called for unnecessary roughness and kept the UT
    drive alive.  The Horns only got a field goal out of the drive, but UT
    had the ball for more than 12 minutes of the 3rd quarter.  This is
    where the Buffs really came together.  UT had momentum and a 22-14
    lead, but CU put together a nice drive to make it 22-20 after missing a
    2-point conversion.  The Buff defense then held, and Dave McCloughan
    returned a punt to the UT 35-yard line.  From there the Buffs took it
    in and led 27-22.  Texas drove into CU territory on their next drive,
    but the Buff defense held.  CU took over on downs, but couldn't run out
    the clock.  Rouen's punt pinned UT deep in their own territory and CU
    got a late safety to win 29-22.
    
    The Buffs showed great character in the 4th quarter, being behind and
    playing in front of that hostile crowd.  They did a good job of
    spreading the ball around on offense, and the passing game finally came
    alive.  And the defense came thru in the 4th quarter with UT headed for
    a potential game-winning TD.  Now they get to play a Washington team
    that bombed #5 USC 31-0.  
    
    Joe
27.595Ho-Hum...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Sep 24 1990 17:096
    Nebraska 56
    Minnesota 0
    
    Minnesota must be close to or at THE bottom of the Big-10.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.596Is OU * THAT * good ???BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Sep 24 1990 20:197
    Oklahoma has played UCLA, Pitt, and Tulsa in pre-conference games.
    
    How have UCLA and Pitt done in their games besides the Oklahoma games?
    I'm trying to get some ballpark idea how good these 2 teams are so as
    to try to determine how good the Okie's are this year.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.597RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't Touch Me There...Mon Sep 24 1990 20:2711
    Marty,
    
    My understanding is taht UCLA is no where near as good as UCLA usually
    is.   Pitt was overrated comeing in, and besides from the shellacking
    the Okies game 'em, they tied Syracuse and beat someone (I think).
    
    Impresive victories for the Okies, but not as impressive, especially
    the UCLA win, as would be usual.
    
    
    JD
27.598Hemingway-CU's MVPDENVER::HITEMon Sep 24 1990 21:3417
    For Ed,
    
    Ed, Fullback George Hemingway had his personal best game in Texas.  He
    was chosen the most valuable player for the Buffs--he rushed for over
    60 yards and caught some crucial passes.
    
    What was encouraging is that CU's offense is definitely
    diversifying--with six different players carrying the ball.  So I think
    some of the pain we experienced early in the season was the evolution
    of this offensive diversification.
    
    I am going to the CU/Washington Saturday.  Should be an exciting one. 
    The networks really blew it by not televising this one.  It should be a
    humdinger!
    
    Go Buffs,
    Jan
27.599CNTROL::CHILDSLord she had a way to fool meTue Sep 25 1990 10:4411
 Pitt beat Boston College. UCLA hasn't beaten anyone and lost this last weekend
 to Michigan 38-15. Given Michigan's higher ranking and less scoring difference
 I'd say Okie is tough. I saw both of their games against Pitt and UCLA and the
 fullback is a load plus real quick. Given that they were blowing the teams out
 they didn't do much passing. The defense looked solid especially agianst the
 pass as both Pitt and UCLA were forced to pass to catch up. They had a couple
 of intys and sacks in both games if I remember correctly. CU and NU are in
 trouble OU is back........

 mike
27.600FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Sep 25 1990 11:233
    Pitt has also beaten Ohio University (not Ohio State).
    
    John
27.601QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Sep 25 1990 11:388
   Nebraska plays Oregon State this weekend.

   The early line has Nebraska favored by 51 points.

   I may live in Colorado country... but I'm taking Nebraska and giving
   the points.

   Mike JN
27.602"The Line" aint worth SQUAT !!!BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 25 1990 12:0722
    "The line" is NOT primarily what the "experts" feel a given
    team will win by. It's the Vegas betting dudes trying to get betting
    interest up. So they make stupid lines like NU by 51 etc...
    Think about it, would you bet on Nebraska in this one if favored by
    28 or 32 points? NO. Buy an idiodic line such as 51 is a challenge.
    This will produce bets where there were none before.
        
    NEVER let "the line" tell you who "should win." It's like a bunch of
    thugs sit around in Vegas and try to decide what is gonna make people
    empty their pockets for betting.
    
    re: few back
    
    Yes the Okies are back and a legit challenge now, but NU and CU need
    not be afraid. Remember, UCLA and PITT were * V A S T L Y * over-rated
    comming into their OU games. Therefore the OU performence is not AS
    impressive as first believed. OU does look good though. I think the
    probation is going to hurt them worse in the next few years than this
    year because recruiting restrictions take a couple of years to catch up
    to ya. Buy one thing is fer shur, they are ALWAYS gonna be tuff !!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.603QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Sep 25 1990 12:2511
   I don't let the line tell me who should win.

   I look at the two teams.

   Nebraska beat Minnesota 56 - 0
   Or St is a pitiful team (Minnesota could beat THEM 56  -  0)

   Consequently, I think a 51 point spread is LOW.
   So I'll take the bet.

   Mike JN
27.604NU vs Or ST - A JOKE...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 25 1990 12:308
    Mike JN
    
    I did not mean to imply that Or St is any kind of challeng to the
    Huskers or any other decent team. My "line" statements were also
    meant as a generic thing, such as when 2 good teams play each other
    also.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.605BSS::JCOTANCHTheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11Tue Sep 25 1990 12:3514
    
>    Yes the Okies are back and a legit challenge now, but NU and CU need
>    not be afraid. Remember, UCLA and PITT were * V A S T L Y * over-rated
>    comming into their OU games. Therefore the OU performence is not AS
>    impressive as first believed. OU does look good though. I think the
 
It could be too early to call the Sooners the favorite in the Big-8, but to
say that CU and NU shouldn't be afraid?  I would have to disagree there.  I've 
seen OU twice and NU once, and would have to say that OU looks better at this 
point.  But then again, it's quite unfair to judge a team from just one game.
OU plays Texas on Oct. 13th, which should be a good measure of how OU stacks
up.

Joe
27.606Diff between Good and GREAT...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 25 1990 12:5428
    re: Joe
    
    My point by that is that if ANY team gets "afraid" of another team
    then they are already beat. OU must be respected as a legit Big-8
    contender this year. No doubt. But NU/CU should have the attitude
    that they can and will beat anybody, anytime. That is as much of
    winning as having the physical talent.
    
    I quote former Boston Celtics great Bill Russell
    
    	"We always had the better team. (pause) ALWAYS !!!"
    
    Now the Celts did NOT ALWAYS have the better team. In '68 and
    especially in '69 they did not. But they won because they had
    the right attitude. At that time they were a bunch of old men
    going up against West, Baylor, and Chamberlin, 7th game at L.A.
    
    I qoute John Havlicheck (I know it's spelled wrong)
    
    	"We always thought it was a MISTAKE when we lost. We EXPECTED
    	to win"
    
    Again, right attitude and mental toughness. And thats what separates
    the good teams from the GREAT teams. Not a difference of.001 seconds
    of speed in the 40. (By the way, I have a tape of the interviews I
    quoted from, so it is accurate.)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.607UCLA is 1-2(or is it 1-3)CSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleTue Sep 25 1990 13:286
    Actually, UCLA has won at least 1 game.  They beat Stanford by 1.  I
    seem to remember some Big-8 team having a real struggle with Stanford. 
    Hmmm... I wonder which team that was???
    
    John(just because I live in CO does not imply that I am a CU fan)
    
27.608Here's my guess...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 25 1990 15:269
    re: -1
    
    Uhhhhhh lets see. Was it, uh, yea that's the ticket, hmmm, maybee,
    
    ...Colorado ????
    
    If I'm right then what do I win??
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.609You got itCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleTue Sep 25 1990 16:157
    re .608
    
    You win .....
    
    
    a passing life for Dr. Tom!!!!
    
27.610Just think of it, passing WITH NU's rushing...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Sep 25 1990 16:229
    re: .609
    
    Whoa Yaaaaaa. That means multiple national championships for THE most
    deserving program in college football. The Might Huskers (Formerly
    known as the "Bugeaters")
    
    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.611CU is favored by 7 over Washington...CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UTue Sep 25 1990 17:0624
    
    re. 598
    
    Jan, thanks for the info.....we CU alums need to stick together
    in these trying times...
    
    I just saw that CU is favored by 7 over Washington.  I know the
    game is being played in Boulder, but this seems a bit high.
    I believe Washington is undefeated and just creamed previously
    unbeaten and #6 USC 31-0.  Do the oddsmakers anticipate that 
    Washington will have a letdown and incoroporate that into the
    odds?
    
    What's the feeling out in Colorado?  Do the players sound confident
    going in against Washington.  I saw people in here mention that
    the CU passing game is clicking...Does anyone have stats on Hagen
    for the Texas game?
    
    Thanks.
    
    Former CU alum who is clueless out here in Massachusetts...
    
    Peace/ed
                                                               
27.612BSS::JCOTANCHTheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11Tue Sep 25 1990 17:4011
    Rushing:    attempts  yards
    Bieniemy      26       99     3 TD's
    Hemingway     7        76
    Hagan         14       31
    Pritchard     1        17
    
    Passing:   attempts  comp.    yards   TD's
    Hagan         11       7       160    1 
    
    Joe
                                        
27.613OK then, I'll be the first...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Wed Sep 26 1990 13:108
Prediction:

	Washington 31
	Colorado   28

Washington withstands a valiant CU comeback.

Nebraska Marty
27.614Wash. will come back to make score respectableCSC32::GL_JOHNSONElvis Is Dead!Thu Sep 27 1990 01:2320
    
    	CU 34, Washington 24.
    
    	I listened to last week's game on the radio while driving around.
    Sounded like they were doing a good job of getting the ball to
    Pritchard and Hemingway, which takes some of the tendencies for
    opposing defenses to concentrate solely on Hagan and/or Bienemy.
    Look for this to continue.    
    
    	One thing CU needs to learn is how to handle being a 'marked' 
    team.  The Buffs are undoubtedly one of the most talented teams in 
    the Top 20.  But talent alone doesn't win games.  Every team will be
    looking to beat them.  They need to use their 'marked' team status to 
    their advantage, like so many of the powerhouse teams have done for 
    years.  I tend to think that the last 3 games have opened their eyes
    to that.  And Washington will definetely be looking for revenge from
    last year(45-14 or something like that).    
    
                                                 glen j.
    
27.615MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Thu Sep 27 1990 10:2914
    re .614
    
    As the ads in the Boston area used to say,
    
    "Welcome to the big leagues, cornbread!"
    
    
    Now you CU fans are starting to get an understanding of what 
    Oklahoma and Nebraska have had to face year end and year out!
    
    Bob V.
    
    
    
27.616"Gunning After..." I have NO sympathy !!!BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Sep 27 1990 12:2717
    re: last few
    
    Thats right, every game NU and OU has played for the last Boo-Koo
    years has been like that !!!
    
    Success breeds contempt. People always pulls for the underdog
    and gets "UP" for the powerhouse. It's human nature.
    
    At Nebraska we like being the "marked" team. It means we have big
    success and respect. So, IF Colorado is going to continue it's
    success of last year, then they better get used to being "marked."
    
    Obviously, this is a situation CU is not used to for obvious reasons.
    Other programs have had success for a while then faded. Time will tell
    if CU can sustain success.
    
    
27.617Dead in here...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Sep 27 1990 17:517
    I realize that some people in this company actually have to work
    and that may account for SOME of the CU fans silence this week - 
    but not all of it.
    
    I think there are some VERY nervous CU fans.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.618He says he likes NU but always talks about CU? :-)CSC32::GL_JOHNSONElvis Is Dead!Thu Sep 27 1990 18:015
 
    	Is there something you're not telling us, Marty? 
    
    						 glen j.
                                                 
27.619HERE GOES..CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYThu Sep 27 1990 18:458
    
    Question....Based on the Buffs first four games compared to the 
    Cornhuskers,Sooners schedule Who's was the toughest?
    
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
27.620But it's academic when they go head-to-headDELNI::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 27 1990 18:5413
    
    Colorado definitely has the toughest schedule in the Big-8.  However,
    Oklahoma has outperformed the Buffs against only slightly less tough 
    competition.  Colorado has had Tennessee, Stanford, Illinois, and 
    Texas, while OU has blown out UCLA and Pittsburgh and will have Texas 
    in three weeks.  It now looks like Colorado's best-played game was 
    against the Vols and they've gone downhill from there.  The OU-Texas 
    game will tell us a lot more about Oklahoma.
    
    For all intents, we know *nothing* about Nebraska until November.
    
    glenn
    
27.621NU is always competetive - so dont relax...CSC32::M_HENDERSONI'm tryin ta think, but nutin happens !!!Thu Sep 27 1990 19:019
    Glen, I dissagree with ya. I think CU's schedule has been much
    tuffer than Oklahoma's. UCLA and Pitt have turned out to be very
    much over-rated.
    
    And whoever said it is right. We know nothing about how good/bad
    Nebraska is based on their pud-state filled pre-Big-8 schedule.
    The only thing we do know is that NU is ALWAYS tuff.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.622CSC32::J_HERNANDEZJump back!!! What's that sound?Thu Sep 27 1990 19:025
    >>        -< He says he likes NU but always talks about CU? :-) >-
    
    
    Y'kno I noticed that too. Ever see Marty in the Cafeteria. All he talks
    about is CU this, CU that. Some NU fan.
27.623Jessie, get a life dude...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Sep 27 1990 20:216
    Jessie, you dont know which way is up and which way is down. With
    NU's schedule there is nothing to talk about untill they destroy CU.
    
    Go Big Red
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.624CU , OU , NU WHO'S THA BEST??CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYThu Sep 27 1990 21:1712
    
    I must agree with CU not playing up to it's potential and out of 
    the Big 8 OU has looked the Most Impressive, but as we know NU and
    OU are always tuff when comes to the Big 8 inter conference games.
    But it's like someone in here said that CU will have to Prove they
    can Defend there title as the BIG 8 CHAMPS and I think Most NU and
    OU fans are a little concerned that CU will do Just That!! Then all 
    This talk about a lucky season will end up being NU/OU's Nightmare
    The end of Domination of the Big 8 by the 2 Big Red Machines.
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
27.625MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Fri Sep 28 1990 11:1413
    
re .624
    
    >This talk about a lucky season will end up being NU/OU's Nightmare
    >The end of Domination of the Big 8 by the 2 Big Red Machines.
    
    >" THE DREWSKI "
    
    
       We shall see, I'm saving this one for the end of the season.
       
       Bob V.
    
27.626CU fans-- enough with the David vs. Goliath thingDELNI::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 28 1990 11:1914
    
    > But it's like someone in here said that CU will have to Prove they
    > can Defend there title as the BIG 8 CHAMPS and I think Most NU and
    > OU fans are a little concerned that CU will do Just That!! Then all 
    > This talk about a lucky season will end up being NU/OU's Nightmare
    > The end of Domination of the Big 8 by the 2 Big Red Machines.
    
    As a humble, modest Sooner fan I don't give a squat about CU becoming
    Big-8 champs.  I'm not concerned and it's not a nightmare.  If CU's for 
    real from here on out, it's only good for the conference, OU included.  
    May the best team win.
    
    glenn (who's bored with just beating Nebraska for the title every time 
           the two teams are even close to evenly matched)  
27.6273 Team Race Changes Things...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 28 1990 14:0817
    Actually, I'm more concerned about the NU-OU game than I am about
    the NU-CU game.
    
    CU plays AT Lincoln and I know for a fact that the Sea of Red will
    be rockin for that one. Revenge factor a plus for NU.
    
    The NU-OU game is played at Oklahoma and is the Okie's last game
    of the season - PERIOD. No bowl for Okie - SO - Nebraska is like
    their bowl game. OU should be very motivated for it. Even IF OU
    looses at CU then they will have only one loss. After NU beats CU
    (confidence !!!) then OU will have a shot at a Big-8 conference
    tie at the very worst. If OU beats CU then OU will have the chance
    to win it outright. So no matter what happens there WILL be an
    NU-OU "shootout" at Norman. I think this years shootout is anyone
    guess. However, the good guys (Big Red of the NORTH) shall prevail !!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.628?MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Fri Sep 28 1990 14:3710
    
    I don't recall anyone mentioning any thing about K State's BIG win 
    over New Mexico St. a few weeks back.
    
    Didn't they win something like 52-7?
    
    K State beating anyone big is big news!
    
    Bob V.
    
27.629Many winks...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 28 1990 15:0011
    
    > K State beating anyone big is big news!
    
    New Mexico St. is quite possibly the worst team in NCAA 1-A.
    
    K-State had the wind taken out of their sails the very next week when 
    they lost to No. Illinois, thereby ending their dreams of an undefeated
    season...
    
    glenn

27.630QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Fri Sep 28 1990 15:578
   As a Buff fan (lukewarm... I live here, but I didn't ever lose anything
   at CU) I think this week is IT for CU. If they beat Washington (which
   is a damned good team) convincingly, then they're back. And OU and NU
   are in a world of trouble. A loss, or a shoddy win, and I have to think
   CU is looking at third place in the Big 8, and will probably not be
   ranked by year end.

   Mike JN
27.631DELNI::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 28 1990 16:158
    
    Today's Boston Globe reports that starting Husker QB Mickey Joseph was
    arrested for criminal mischief while attempting to break into his
    girlfriend's apartment following an incident.  Tom Osborne plans no
    disciplinary action and expects all charges to be dropped.
    
    glenn
    
27.632From the paper...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 28 1990 16:2714
    From the Co. Springs Gazette
    
                 NEBRASKA QB ARRESTED FOR BREAKING WINDOW
    
    University of Nebraska qb Robert L. "Mickey" Joseph was arrested
    following an incident at the apartment of his girlfriend, said police
    in Lincoln, Neb. Joseph, 22, was booked into Lancaster County Jail on
    suspicion of criminal mischief, a Class IV felony involving property
    damage of $300 or more. He was released after posting bond. Baird said
    Joseph allegedly broke an exterior window and damaged an inner window
    while trying to enter his girlfriend's apartment. Nebraska coach Tom
    Osborne said he was told Joseph had gone over to his girlfriend's
    apartment to pick up a class syllabus. Osborne said he would take no
    discilinary action against Joseph.
27.633BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 28 1990 16:305
    re: .631
    
    I thought Grant was "starting" over Joseph ???
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.634I agree, if innocent break-in, no discipline requiredDELNI::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 28 1990 16:317
    
    Hmmm, the Globe didn't mention anything about the syllabus.  They
    seemed to imply that there was a fight or an altercation or something.
    Irresponsible jounalism?
    
    glenn
    
27.635MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Fri Sep 28 1990 17:1317
    
    >K-State had the wind taken out of their sails the very next week when 
    >they lost to No. Illinois, thereby ending their dreams of an undefeated
    >season...

      Northen Ilinois is a lower division powerhouse that plays the likes 
      of Nebraska and Illinois (Illinois is scheduling both No. & So. Ill).
    
      
    re:  Grant/Joseph
    
      Grant has been injured and Joseph is running the team.
    
    Bob V.
    
    
    
27.636GO BUFFS!!!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYFri Sep 28 1990 17:3610
    
    re.625
    
    By all means save it for the end of the year Bob, Because
    one of us will be eating crow. It taste kinda funny too..:-)
    
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
27.637SHOOT-OUT OR BLOW OUT!!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYFri Sep 28 1990 17:5320
    
    re.627
    
    >I'm more concerned about the NU-OU game than I am about
     the NU-CU game.
    
    I think NU fans have always been concerned about OU. But 
    now even if your playing CU at Home you have to be concerned
    about them. And I think CU wants to Beat NU (there designated RED game)
    more than any game of the season I think like wise for OU.
    
    >There will be a NU-OU SHOOT-OUT. 
     
     When have'nt there been a Nu-Ou shoot-out. Those 2 teams have
     dominated the Big 8 for Years without fear of any of the other
     programs coming up to there level.
    
    
     " THE DREWSKI "
    
27.6381st year in ...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Sep 28 1990 18:486
    re: -1
    
    Last year there was no "shootout" so to speak. By that I mean that it
    was NOT for the Big-8 title.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.639CSC32::GL_JOHNSONElvis Is Dead!Sat Sep 29 1990 22:1812
    
    	CU 20, Washington 14.
                          
    	Buffs are now 3-1-1 and finished with the brutal non-conference
    schedule, and hopefully, will move up a few notches in the polls. 
    
        Nebraska won 31-7 or something like that.  OU also won; don't 
    have the score.
    
    						 glen j.
                         
    
27.640BSS::JCOTANCHTheGreatAmericanDream: ND goes 0-11Mon Oct 01 1990 12:1013
    The Buffs win a big win and I heard on the radio this morning that they
    have moved up to 12 in the AP poll.  I only caught the end of the game
    on the radio, but Washington had a first and goal at the CU 7 with
    about 2 minutes to go and the Buffs held them for the win.  Hagan
    slightly separated his shoulder, but is expected to back for this
    week's game against Mizzou.
    
    NU did win 31-7, but trailed at halftime 7-3 and only led 10-7 after 3
    quarters.  NU was a 51-point favorite in this one.
    
    OU beat Kansas 31-17.
    
    Joe
27.641NO NU news here in Colorado...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 01 1990 13:4919
>               ...but Washington had a first and goal at the CU 7 with
>    about 2 minutes to go and the Buffs held them for the win.    
    
    I did not see the game. I HEARD that in that series that Washington
    recievers dropped 2 passes in the end zone. Is that true???
    
>    NU did win 31-7, but trailed at halftime 7-3 and only led 10-7 after 3
>    quarters.  NU was a 51-point favorite in this one.
    
    Geesh. That does not look good. I read a little write up in the C.
    Springs Gazzette. They hardly had anything about any Big-8 game
    but Colorado (Omaha World Herald had good write ups on ALL Big-8
    games when I lived there). Anyway, the Gazzette said that NU had
    fumble and penalty problems in the first half. This is still no
    excuse against a Patsy State (Oregon State). I dont know anything
    other than that.
    
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.642Lackluster efforts by NU/OU, CU comes up big...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 01 1990 14:4518
    
    Nebraska outgained Oregon St. 508 yards to 133, but committed three
    turnovers to the Beavers' two.  Nebraska obviously must have picked up
    a lot of yardage in the fourth quarter.
    
    Kansas outgained Oklahoma 396 yards to 261, but committed four 
    turnovers to the Sooners' one.  Kansas also must have picked up a lot
    of yardage in the fourth quarter to cut a 31-7 game at the end of three
    to a respectable 31-17 final.
    
    Neither team particularly distinguished themselves, but in Oklahoma's
    case at least they managed to avoid the inevitable upset to Kansas
    (their longest rivalry in terms of years played) that occurs about once
    a decade.  Oregon State is one of the weakest teams in the country and
    could pose no real threat over a four-quarter game, I'm sure.
    
    glenn
     
27.643CU-Wash WrappupPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Oct 01 1990 16:4345
>    I did not see the game. I HEARD that in that series that Washington
>    recievers dropped 2 passes in the end zone. Is that true???
    
  I listened to the whole game on the radio. I really don't know how
  catchable the 2 passes were. However, I got the impression that the 
  Washington quarterback was pressured and did not exactly put the ball
  on the money. On the other 2 plays, Alfred Thompson batted down a pass
  and Deon Figures intercepted a fad away on the 4th down play.

  The game started with an impressive 80 yard TD drive for Wash. It looked
  like it was going to be a long day for CU. But for the most of the
  first half it was a good defensive effort by both teams until CU
  made a last minute drive and connected on a 44 yard field goal.

  CU still had the momentum on their side as they drove 80 yards for
  a TD after the 2nd half kickoff. Big plays were a 40 reception by Rico 
  Smith and a 15 yard TD run by Hagan. (10-7 CU). Eventually, Wash scored
  a TD making it 14-10 Wash. CU then had another impressive long drive
  for a TD finished with a 3 yard run by Hagan. (17-14 CU) One important play 
  on the drive included a Wash interception of a Hagan pass but the defensive
  back fumbled the ball on the run back and CU recovered.
 
  CU's defense looked good but when they got the ball back, they couldn't
  move the ball and found themselves in 4th down and 10 on the CU 25 yard
  line. The punter Rouen faked a punt, then threw to an unknown special
  teams player who raced for 25 yards and a first down. CU then drove 
  inside the Wash 20 and kicked another field goal. But Hagan injured his
  shoulder on the drive.

  Again the CU defense held Wash and CU got the ball back around the
  CU 20 yard line with about 10 minutes left in the game. With Charles 
  Johnson at QB, CU again drove to the Wash 20 where a CU field goal would 
  have locked up a win. But Bienimi fumbled with 4 minutes left. Wash
  drove down to the CU 7 yard and had first and goal. 2 incomplete passes,
  a pass batted down and an interception resulted in a CU win.

  All in all, I got the impression CU was the better team but almost lost
  because of mistakes. Before the game, Washington's defense allowed
  an average of only 23 yards rushing per game. But Bienimi had somewhere 
  around 148 yards rushing. Hagan's passing was very good for the 2nd week 
  in a row. His completion rate was average but the yards per reception was 
  high (over 20 yards). Pritchard looks like a very dangerous receiver and 
  CU would be wise to get him the ball as often as possible.

						Keith  
27.644Ho Hum...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Oct 05 1990 14:149
    This Saturday its:
    
    	Nebraska vs @Kansas State
       @Oklahoma vs Oklahoma State
    	Colorado vs @Mizou
    
    No wonder its so dead in here.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.645Just settin' the record straight!MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Fri Oct 05 1990 16:234
    
    
             Mizzou is spelled with two Zs like ZZ Top!
    
27.646CJ might startDENVER::HITEFri Oct 05 1990 20:016
    It is possible that Darian Hagan will not start in tomorrow's CU-Mizzou
    game due to an injury to his shoulder from last week's game.
    
    If so, "CJ" Charles Johnson #4 will start in his place.
    
    Jan
27.647GO " CJ "CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYFri Oct 05 1990 22:589
    
    I hope CJ does start this kid is really has talent also it would be
    nice to let him show his stuff and build confidence from the team
    that he can come in and take Hagan's place.
    
    
    " THE DREWSKI "
    
    
27.648Why did CU get 5 downs?CSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleSat Oct 06 1990 18:5015
    
    I need some help understanding that last series that CU had against
    Missouri.
    
    CU got a first and goal at the 3 and 1/2.  They then threw the ball
    into the ground to stop the clock.  On 2nd down they ran Bienemy up the
    middle to the 1 and then called time out.  On 3rd down they again ran 
    Bienemy up the middle and he was stopped for a loss and for some strange 
    reason the officials stopped the clock.  CJ then threw the ball into
    the ground to stop the clock.  That was 4th down.  Why didn't the ball
    go over to Missouri?  Why did CU get 5 downs?
    
    Does anyone really believe that CJ then got into the endzone on that
    5th down play?
    
27.649BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Sat Oct 06 1990 19:117
    I was listening to the last few minutes on the radio and I'm not sure
    if CU actually got 5 first downs, but we'll know more after reading
    Sunday's sports page.
    
    Anyways, final is 33-31.
    
    Joe
27.650RipoffROULET::GARRYBring on the A'sSat Oct 06 1990 19:128
    re -1
    
    \
    Thats an easy one 
    The referee is a bigtime CU fan.
    
    
    Tom
27.651Confirmed-- CU got 5 downs.CSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleSat Oct 06 1990 19:506
    
    Well, they just confirmed on TV that CU got 5 downs but the head of
    officials said that once the 5th down is run, the mistake is
    uncorrectable.  That's a bunch of BS.  It was the last play of the
    game.  Why can't they just declare the play null and let the game end?
    
27.652Waaaa!CSC32::GL_JOHNSONHomie D. Clown!Sat Oct 06 1990 20:3213
    re: .650
    
    	So that means that the ref that made the horrible call in the 31-30
    ND-Miami game two years ago was a ND fan huh?  :-)
    
    	Bad officiating; sometimes if goes in your favor, sometimes it 
    doesn't.  It's part of the game.
    
    	Haven't seen the game yet, but judging from that close score I'd
    say that Mizzou is *much* improved.  The OU and NU better not look
    past them.
    
    						 glen j.
27.653There is a little differenceCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleSat Oct 06 1990 20:344
    
    There is a little bit of difference between a bad call on a fumble and
    letting a team have 5 downs...
    
27.654CSC32::GL_JOHNSONHomie D. Clown!Sat Oct 06 1990 21:2710
    
    	Both affected the final score, right?  Both were/are bad calls.
    
    	Ifs, could haves, should haves, and would haves(ie - whining)don't 
    get you nothing, but heartache.
    
    	Missouri shouldn't have been in a position to lose the game on a 
    bad call.
    
    						 glen j.
27.655Huh?CSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleSat Oct 06 1990 23:206
    
    The difference is that one is a judgement call and the other is not. 
    You have to expect the referees to make an occasional bad call on a
    judgement call but not on something as black and white as what down it
    is.
    
27.656SHAME!MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 08 1990 09:153
    
    One begins to wonder if CU can win a ball game on their own!
    
27.657AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sMon Oct 08 1990 10:398
    	Big difference Glen.  A referee can make a bad judgement call,
    but to mess up big time on the rules is pretty pathetic.  Actually
    didn't something like this happen a few years ago?  Wasn't Cornell
    involved.  Anyways the team that benefited from the call actually
    gave the other team the win, or something like that.  It was a very
    *honorable* thing to do.
    
    				/Don
27.658What a JOKE...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 11:2620
    Seriously though. I have 3 thoughts about this:

    	1. There is NO excuse for a huge blunder such as this. Definitely
    	   an asterics game. The refs are to blame for Mizzou's loss.

    	2. As stated earlier, CU should not have been in a position such
    	   as this against a team like Mizzou if Cu is really any good.
    	   Mizzou is improved, but not THAT much !!! CU should hang their
    	   tail between their legs and bury their heads in sand.

    	3. IF, and this is a * BIG * if, CU wins the Big-8 by a game or
    	   less than this is a complete and utter travesty. A total joke.
    	   Even if Cu dosent win the big-8 than it is still a joke.
    
    Gee, I wonder if this ref crew was the same guys that missed 2 blatant
    clips last year on punt returns and granted CU the Big-8 title.
    Ooohhhhhh, that is bound to stir things up. Ha   ;^)

    Nebraska Marty

27.659FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Oct 08 1990 11:499
    Cornell vs Dartmouth in either the late forties or early fifties.  The
    team that won the game through the error gave the game back to the
    loser and both schools list it that way in their records.  Also
    happened in a Bears - Rams game in the sixties.
    
    There is no provision for correcting an error of this type once the
    game is over.  Unfair as it is Colorado wins.
    
    John
27.660Come on Nov. 3rd, I cant wait...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 11:5222
    One more thing. I'm really venting here. Did any of you Colorado
    "locals" listen to the game on KOA? I caught the last 2 min. and
    the post game.

    I tell ya, I was building up respect for McArtny and the CU program.
    However, practically all KOA * AND * McArtny would talk about was
    the slippery field and the fact that THEY (the Buffs) slipped so
    much. I quote McArtny - "If Missouri does not feel there was anything
    wrong with this field then they need to take a good look at
    themselves." How SELF-RIGHTEOUS !!! And KOA kept going on and on about
    it. It was much worse than any biased Husker broadcast on KFAB.

    Let me tell ya - BOTH teams had to play on the same field !!!!!!!!!!!!
    It affects BOTH teams the same way. Hearing the KOA guys, CU players,
    and McArtny squawk and whine about it made me sick. They were given a
    game by the refs and all they do is squawk about the field.
    Discracefull.

    Get real CU !!!  If you keep this up NU and OU are gonna wipe the field
    with you.

    Nebraska Marty
27.661AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers... Pants for |CENSORED|sMon Oct 08 1990 11:562
    	I think Colorado should do the *manly* thing and give the win
    to Missouri.
27.6622 quotes say it all...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 11:5615
    The Big-8 director of officials was at the CU-Mizzou game. When asked
    about it after the game he only had one comment:
    
    		"NO COMMENT
    
    Kind of says it all.
    
    I qoute the Mizzou coach in the post game interview:
    
    		"I guess SAL is back..."
    
    You CU fans who only listen to YOUR biased local press are sheltered
    from the rest of the worlds attitude about it.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.663GENRAL::WADEBye bye Ms. American PieMon Oct 08 1990 12:0122
    
    	The only thing your note will stir up is those sour
    	grapes that have been festering since last year
    	when CU beat your huskers.
    
    	A quote by Mac in yesterday's paper indicated that
    	*somebody* called timeout prior to Johnson spiking
    	the ball to stop the clock thus negating that play.
    	I didn't see the game so I can't give an opinion.
    	There is a precedent here though.  A score, on the
    	last play of a game, was reversed in an Ivy league
    	game.  
    
    	If there was an error in the down marker, as it
    	appears there is, then they should reverse the
    	score and give Mizzou the "W".  However, keep in
    	mind that play calling is effected in situations
    	like this.  For example, if a team is out of timeouts
    	(like CU), then more than likely they will pass on 3rd
    	down so that the clock stops if it is incomplete.
    
    	Claybone
27.664GENRAL::WADEBye bye Ms. American PieMon Oct 08 1990 12:0711
    
    Marty,
    		
    	Who the hell are we supposed to listen to?  I don't
    	recall any Nebraska stations broadcasting the damn
    	game.  I don't know about your radio, but mine doesn't
    	pick up any out of state radio stations broadcasting
    	CU games (read that there aren't any).  Get a clue 
    	will ya?
    
    Claybone
27.665Five Downs & Omni TurfDENVER::HITEMon Oct 08 1990 12:0858
    Good morning, Marty.  I had an idea that you would be penning a
    "pulitzer-prize winning" commentary on the CU/Mizzou game!!!!!
    
    The Rocky Mountain News head line yesterday read, "Colorado Takes the
    Fifth".  This is the first time in 50 years that referees errored in
    keeping track of the downs.  Apparently in 1940 the same thing happened
    to Cornell.
    
    CU got two second downs in the waning moments of the game:
    
    		First down - CJ takes the snap and grounds the ball,
    			     stopping the clock at 28 seconds
    
    		1st Second down - Bieniemy moves ahead to the one 
    			     yard line. CU calls their last timeout
    
    		(At this point the down markers were not changed)
    
    		2nd Second down - Bieniemy tries to hurtle over into
    			     the end zone but is stopped
    
                Third down - CJ grounds the ball to stop the clock.
    	                     There are 2 seconds left in the game
    
                Fourth down - CJ makes the touchdown
    
    
    CU's major problem throughout the game was slipping.  There were 92
    instances of CU players losing their footing.  Coach McCartney (who by
    the way is not a cry-baby) complained about the Omni Turf at Faurot
    Field.  He is quoted as saying, " The biggest story is that field is
    not playable.  No one should have to play; on that field.  You can't
    even make a cut on that dang field".  It is true that the option game
    for CU was ineffectual because of constant slipping.
    
    McCartney even put Hagan in at the beginning of the second half,
    thinking that CJ was having a bad day.  But Hagan was slipping around
    also and even aggravated his shoulder injury.  Even after many of the
    Buffs put on their rain cleats, they continued to slip.
    
    It is unfortunate that the game has to be clouded in such
    controversy::: Fifth down plays and poor turf.  There were many 
    noteworthy things about the game.
    
    Mizzou's Kiefer pashed for 326 yards, completing 19 of 34 attempts with
    one interception.
    
    Eric Bieniemy rushed for 217 yards and broke the record for CU's
    all-time rushers.  He has rushed for over 3,000 yards (1987-90).
    
    CU's Mike Pritchard ran for a 68-yard touchdown and also caught a pass
    which resulted in a 70-yard touchdown.
    
    Charles Johnson had a great game and exhibited courage and skill in
    heading the 88-yard march during the last 2 and a half minutes of the
    game--the march that ended with the controversial five downs.
    
    
27.666BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 12:1315
    There is a Colorado station that is part of the Nebraska Football
    Network. It is in northern Colorado and it cannot be picked up
    very well in C. Springs.
    
    But that was not the point. Perhaps I wasent very clear. The point
    is that EVERY local broadcast is biased to some degree. You CU fans
    have ragged on me time and time again about listening to the Omaha
    press saying that that has skewed my views. 
    
    Well, it goes BOTH ways. The Colorado press is AT LEAST as bad as the
    Omaha press. I've lived BOTH places. CU and McArtney act so dang self-
    righteous it makes me sick. McArtneys respones after this game really
    dissapointed me. I * USED * to think better of him.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.667PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Oct 08 1990 12:1529
  I watched the game on Denver's channel 4. Nobody including the announcer's,
  both teams and 99% of the viewer's had any idea that it was fifth down.
  In fact channel 4 went off the air with no mention of 5 downs.

  In yesterday's Rocky Mtn News, it said that between 2 and 3rd down, neither 
  the field marker's or the scoreboard was advanced to a new down. On 4th 
  down, CU thought it was 3rd down (because that's what the field marker and 
  scoreboard reflected) and thus spiked the ball after the snap to stop the 
  clock. I'm sure that if CU thought it was 4th down they would have run a 
  play. So you can hardly blame CU. In fact, if the field marker's were
  correct, they may still have won the game by running a play instead of
  spiking the ball.

  But there's more to the story. Coach McArthy was furious about the condition
  of the playing field. There was no rain for a week and there was perfect
  weather but the CU player's constantly found there feet slipping out from
  under them. The reason was the playing surface was simply worn out. This
  affected CU much more that Mizzou because of their option offense. There 
  were at least 15 slips by CU ball carrier's when big gains were obvious. 
  If fact one of them would have scored the game winning TD 2 or 3 downs 
  before the 5th down fiasco. You would really have to see the game to 
  understand that CU may have blown them away if there was a good playing 
  surface.

  Whatever comes of this, I think you have to give Charles Johnson and the CU
  offense a lot of credit for a drive which started on the CU 13 with 2:20
  left.

  					Keith  
27.668No Sympathy...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 12:1919
>    CU's major problem throughout the game was slipping.  There were 92
>    instances of CU players losing their footing.  Coach McCartney (who by
>    the way is not a cry-baby) complained about the Omni Turf at Faurot
>    Field.  He is quoted as saying, " The biggest story is that field is
>    not playable.  No one should have to play; on that field.  You can't
>    even make a cut on that dang field".  It is true that the option game
>    for CU was ineffectual because of constant slipping.
    
    
    Waaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaaa, sigh, sigh, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaa
    I want my home field and mommy, waaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaaaaaa...
    
    I'm sorry but I have ZERO sympathy. Both teams played on the same
    field. There is no excuse.
    
    I do not mean disrespect to the author of the note I quoted. This
    is meant toward coach Cry Baby McArtny. (How do ya spell it anyway?)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.669Michigan has 1 loss, what is going on ???BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 12:2417
    I know NU has a weak schedule but...
    
    Fresno state (Division 1A) who was undefeated, got beat by Northern
    Illinois (a 1990 Husker victem 60-14) by a score of...
    
    			73 - 18
    
    Northern Ill. QB set a NCAA record for rushing for a QB with 308 yds.
    
    I know Fresno is weak but...
    
    New UPI poll...
    
    	#1  Michigan
        #2  The Mighty Nebraska Huskers
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.670Fres no = 24MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 08 1990 12:308
    re .669
    
    Fresno State is NOT a weak team.  They were ranked 24th by CNN or
    some such poll and were number two in scoring defense, giving up 
    only about eight points per game.  Before Saturday, that is.
    
    Bob V.
    
27.671I USED to respect McArney...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 12:3215
    re: few back
    
    Agreed. The 5th down was NOT CU's fault. ESPN showed it on
    Sportscenter. The down marker was NOT changed after the second down.
    The CU QB and coaches were simply following the markers. Not Cu's
    fault.
    
    What I am complaining about is the officials and Cry Baby McArtney's
    respone after the game.
    
    Perhaps Nebraska should defect to the Big-10. The Big-8 has become a
    VERY rinky-dink football conference. Looks to me like it's back to the
    Big-2 little-8. But you cant count CU out for sure just yet.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.672Why stop the clockCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleMon Oct 08 1990 12:3313
    
    One thing that has not been mentioned that I think is important is why
    CU even had a chance to get off that last play.
    
    CU had the ball on the 1 with no timeouts and 18 seconds.  Bienemy ran
    up the middle and was stopped.  The clock should have run out but for
    some unknown reason the officials stopped the clock to unpile.  I have
    never seen that done in college football.  In my opinion, if CU was
    stupid enough to run the ball up the middle with no timeouts then they
    did not deserve to win.
    
    I suggest that McCartney has no honor if he does not forfeit the game.
    
27.673omni turfBSS::MENDEZMon Oct 08 1990 13:2523
    I heard an interesting description of the omin turf in Missouri.
    The turf is like astroturf in that it is artificial but it is unlike
    astroturf in that it has very little nap(sp?) it.  This turf is placed
    down on a bed of sand.  What happens when the surface is worn is that
    the sand begins to sho thru the turf and causes a slippery surface.
    One of the denver announcers on saturday asked McArtney why did they
    not complain about the surface 2 years ago and why didn't Arizona
    complain about it last week?  The response was interesting.  It was
    discovered that the last time colorado played in missouri it had rained
    hard the night before the game but was sunny during the game.  The omni
    turf due to the sand being settled, actually gives you pretty good
    footing.  This year it has been warm in missouri for a while.
    
    Arizona or ASU had complained also about the same surface.  They said
    as did Colorado that they tried every shoe they had but nothing worked.
    Incidentally the offense run by AU or ASU is a veer offense which
    requires a team to have good footing because of the many cuts made by
    both the quarterbacks and runningbacks.  Missouri runs an offense that
    basically comes right after you with straight up blocking and running.
    
    It is true that a home team plays and recruits athletes to suit their
    home field.  Missouri is a much improved team but both Arizona and CU
    are dependent on a quality field.
27.674FRSBEE::BROOKSTwo snaps, a twist, and a kiss!Mon Oct 08 1990 13:336
    Someone earlier said that this is the 1st mistake of this kind by a ref
    in 50 years ... not so.
    
    I'm almost positive that a team won a bowl game in the early 70's on a
    phantom 5th down play (orange Bowl ?) ... can someone provide specifics
    ?
27.675FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Oct 08 1990 13:408
    Not quite.  Late sixties/early seventies Orange Bowl, Penn State vs
    either Missouri or Kansas.  Penn State needed to go for 2 late in the
    game and missed, but there was a penalty on the defense.  If I remember
    right it was for 12 men on the field.  It was quite a controversial
    penalty but it stood, Penn State got the 2 points on its second attempt
    and won.
    
    John
27.676This one ???SHALOT::HUNTWyld Stallyns RulesMon Oct 08 1990 13:4010
    Doc,
    
    Could you be thinking of the Orange Bowl game played between Penn State
    and Kansas ???  It was 1970, I think.  Might have been 1969 or 1971.
    
    Penn State won 15-14 after they had two shots to make a 2 point
    conversion.  The first one failed but the Jayhawks had 12 men on the
    field and Penn State got a second chance and won.
    
    Bob Hunt
27.678CU 33, Mizzou 31, Case ClosedBSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Mon Oct 08 1990 13:5737
    On first down of the fifth-down series, CU spiked the ball to stop the
    clock, but the ball was snapped before the referees officially put the
    ball in play.  Therefore, that play shouldn't have counted.  The
    problem here, is that the down marker WAS moved after this first down
    spike.  Nevertheless, this play shouldn't have been an official play,
    and only four downs were official.
    
    And what you guys are failing to realize is that CU did actually have 5
    plays, they really wasted fourth down on purpose to stop the clock. 
    Let's say the first down was official and the markers were right.  Then
    on Bienemy's try to get in on third down (which would have READ 3rd
    down on the scoreboard and sideline marker), CU obviously wouldn't have
    spiked the ball to stop the clock on what would have been 4th down.  As
    a matter of fact, CU probably wouldn't have run Bienemy on 3rd down
    because they were out of timeouts and wouldn't have had time to get
    organized for another play.  Granted, they did have time for another
    play, but it was just a quick spike to stop the clock.  To sum it up, if
    the officials would have corrected the error when it occured, CU's
    series of plays would have been totally different and they might have
    scored anyway, or they might not have.  Therefore a forfeit by CU would
    be unfair to the Buffs.  So you see Marty, you (once again) fail to see
    the situation objectively.  And another thing, if this
    happened to Nebraska or anyone else, you can be damm sure that they
    wouldn't forfeit it either, so you guys can stop bashing McCartney for
    that right now.  
    
    As for the turf, true both teams did have the same conditions, but
    remember that Mizzou practices on that field.  Plus, as has been
    brought up before, this condition hurts CU's offense more than
    Missouri's.  Another good point was brought up by a previous noter,
    that Arizona State also complained about the surface in their game at
    Columbia last week.
    
    The Big Eight will release an official statement regarding the
    fifth-down situation today.
    
    Joe
27.679AXIS::ROBICHAUDTaxCheats,WelfareFrauds,CUFootballMon Oct 08 1990 14:122
    
    
27.680Right?MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 08 1990 14:157
    re .678
    
    If CU spiked the ball before the ref officially put it in play,
    then CU should have been penalized five yards for delay of game!
    
    Bob V.
    
27.681I saw that Steven...AXIS::ROBICHAUDTaxCheats,WelfareFrauds,CUFootballMon Oct 08 1990 14:331
    
27.682It's not just me...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 14:397
    re: .678
    
    Joe, dont just talk to me. There are many noters in here and most
    people accross that nation that disagree with you in many points
    about this.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.683But did the refs see it!?MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 08 1990 14:408
    re .681
    
    I saw it too!  
    
    This is like the case of the two first downs or was second downs!
    
    Bob V.
    
27.685Jab, Jab, Jab...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 14:5611
    Next weeks games...
    
         Sooners   at Texas
      at Huskers      Mizzou
      at 5th downers  Iowa State
    
    Yaaaaaaaaa HaaaaaHaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
    
    Sorry guys and gals, I just couldent resist it.   ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.686I have never defended NU's schedule...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 15:0811
    re: .684
    
    Did I complain about NU not being number 1 ??? I realize I did put
    the little comment about Michigan with 1 loss in there. But I firmly
    believe that because of "strength of schedule" that NU should not even
    be rated 2nd. I dont think that Michigan should be number one though.
    
    Who is still undefeated ????? One of the undefeateds should be ranked
    number one. 
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.687They Will Lose to NU but OU is gonna win it all !!!RSST6::RIGGENBurley from bikingMon Oct 08 1990 15:1411
I'll agree that CU isn't going to win the Big 8 this year. 

The performance Saturday was pathetic, The pass coverage was playing too 
tight all day long allowing Mizzu's QB to loft up bombs and left the receiver
run under the ball. 
CU adjusted Offensivly at the half trailing 14-10 and proceeded to roll but the
defense isn't putting pressure on the QB's in the 2nd half. The College rule
about not advancing the ball after a knee touches the turf is ridiculous, too
many times Saturday CU could have advanced the ball but after the pitch the 
player slips making his cut was getting real old. Films show 92 slips during the 
course of the game.  
27.688UVAVSNUMILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 08 1990 15:187
    Michigan?  
    
    Why they couldn't even beat a weak-a**ed team that couldn't beat a
    team that even Colorado could beat without resorting to chicanery!
    
    :-)
    
27.689???MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 08 1990 15:257
    
     > Films show 92 slips during the course of the game.  
    
        Didn't know CU was allowed to bring that many players!
    
        :-Q
    
27.690Could've been a Jets game, but I forget for certainHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERNuke the New Kids!!Mon Oct 08 1990 15:298
    >Someone earlier said that this is the 1st mistake of this kind by a ref
    >in 50 years ... not so.
    
    It happened in a pro game within the last 5 years.  It turned out to be
    nonconsequental so I've forgotten all the specifics.  I know it was
    highlighted on ESPN.
    
    Dan
27.692This is sooooooo fun...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 15:3720
     > Films show 92 slips during the course of the game.  
    
    Waaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaahaaaa,waaaaaaaa
    I want my mommy waaaaa, waaaaaaaa...
    
    Gee, this kind of sounds like, uhmmm, lets see now, what did the CU
    fans call it last year when I complained, uhhh lets see, YEA, thats
    the ticket, they called it...
    
    				"SOUR GRAPES"
    
    Geez this is fun !!!
    
    Maybee instead of callen em the "5th Downers" we could callem the
    "92ers" or we could just use last years pat name for em - the Colorado
    Clippers.
    
    Welcome to reality Buffs...
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.693BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Mon Oct 08 1990 15:4127
    
>    Joe, dont just talk to me. There are many noters in here and most
>    people accross that nation that disagree with you in many points
>    about this.
    
    Marty, the reason I was addressing you is because you have always been
    the most vocal NU fan in here and this fifth down issue is no
    exception. 
    
    And why are you NU fans (I'm not just talking to Marty :^)) so worried   
    about CU anyway.  The big talk from NU and their fans is getting
    revenge on CU in Lincoln.  One would think you would want CU to come
    into Lincoln with as good a record as possible and undefeated in the
    conference.  Or maybe you guys want CU to get upset by a couple teams
    in the Big-8 so even when NU loses to CU the Huskers can back into the
    Big-8 title.  
    
    RE- #1 ranking
    I think Michigan is totally deserving to be ranked #1.  They outplayed
    Shame and should have won the game.  Virginia and Nebraska shouldn't be
    #1 because of their patsy schedules, but at least NU will get a chance
    to prove themselves against CU and OU.  IMO the only other team that
    should get consideration for the top spot is Oklahoma, but the last 2
    weeks they have struggled.  
    
    Joe 
 
27.694GENRAL::WADEBye bye Ms. American PieMon Oct 08 1990 15:595
    
    	The upper threshold for obnoxiousness has been crossed
    	in this note.  That's reality.......
    
    	Claybone
27.695I couldent resist, it's all in fun...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 16:096
    re: -1
    
    Have you forgotten? This is the DEC Sports notesfile. Status-quo
    is maintained.     :-)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.696Think I heard this somewhere...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 16:176
    re: .693
    
    Am I correct on this or not. OU, being on probabion, cannot be
    number 1 in one of the polls but can be in the other ???
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.697MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 08 1990 16:229
    Marty,
    
    First, there are more than two polls. :-)
    
    Second,  As I recall, one of the big two, AP/UPI, does not rate
    teams that are on probation the other does.
    
    Bob V.
    
27.698UPI:NO, AP:YesCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleMon Oct 08 1990 16:383
    
    UPI(Coaches Poll) does not rate teams on probation.  AP does.
    
27.699LUNER::BROOKSTwo snaps, a twist, and a kiss!Mon Oct 08 1990 16:438
    Thanks for the replies John and Bob, but I'm pretty certain that there
    was another bowl game (or important regular season game) in that time
    period that had a 5th down decide the issue - I'll try to look it up.
    
    BTW, in that famous KU-Penn State game, a look at the game film showed
    that KU had 12 men on the field not just on the play that was flagged,
    but for *the entire 4 downs from the one yard line* right before the
    2pt. conversion !
27.700FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Oct 08 1990 16:4443
    Of the two major polls, one is a media poll and one is done by the
    coaches.  Forget which is which, but the poll where the coaches vote
    doesn't allow teams on probation to be in.
    
    Regarding the series of downs at the end of the game:
    
    Colorado still shouldn't be penalized for what happened.  In a
    situation like that, a good official (usually, the umpire, who is the
    official who lines up behind the defensive line of scrimmage) should
    stand over the ball and not move until right before the referee
    signals the ball ready to be snapped.  He obviously didn't do that, so
    in that sense the officials lost control.  If any time ran off the
    clock then the referee should have told the clock operator to add time
    back, or make an announcement about the time being kept on the field.
    Keeping the time on the field is the responsibility of the line judge.
    All that would happen is that it would be ruled no play.  Since the
    clock was stopped (or should have been stopped) to move the chains and
    since the clock doesn't start until the referee signals the ball ready
    for play, there was no delay of game here.  I believe the referee and
    umpire lost control of this situation (mistake #1).
     
    (The scoreboard clock operator in college is listed as a member of the
    officiating crew)
    
    Further, it's the responsibility of the head linesman to make sure the
    chains and down markers are being handled correctly.  Every official
    wears a rubber band around his wrist and wraps it around his fingers
    with the down - around 1 finger, first down.  Around 2 fingers, second
    down and so forth.  A good head linesman will check the position of the
    chains and the down marker on every play.  This is mistake #2.
    
    It ain't Colorado's fault, and nothing says they have to give the game
    back.  It ain't Missouri's fault, but all they can do is cry about it.
    The officiating crew screwed up twice, but unfortunately there's no way
    to correct it once the game is over.
    
    If I'd been in that situation, the NFL Observer sits right in front of
    our crew and I would have alerted him about the situation, and let him
    take it from there, if possible.  I don't know what he could have done
    to correct it since he's not in direct contact with the officials. 
    He'd have to talk to the communicator in the replay booth.
    
    John
27.701One of these days it'll go AGAINST CU...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 17:0118
    re: .700
    
    Very good note. We can analyze untill we are blue in the face, but
    it boils down to 1 crucial point...
    
    >                                      ...I believe the referee and
    > umpire lost control of this situation (mistake #1).
     
    
    > It ain't Colorado's fault, and nothing says they have to give the game
    > back.  It ain't Missouri's fault, but all they can do is cry about it.
    > The officiating crew screwed up twice, but unfortunately there's no way
    > to correct it once the game is over.
   
    Truely an injustice to Mizzou. CU lucks out again. I know we are all
    human, includeing the refs, but man, was this ever a big screw up.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.702BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Mon Oct 08 1990 18:227
   
>    Truely an injustice to Mizzou. CU lucks out again. 
    
    CU lucks out again??????  Care to fill us in on the last time they
    "lucked" out?
    
    Joe    
27.703RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR Joe Morgan &amp; Jerry Burns brothers??Mon Oct 08 1990 18:399
    Joe,
    
    I could use the word 'undeserving' when talking of CU, much as you
    use it when talking about ND.   Or is only teams you hate that 'luck
    out'....
    
    Hope this Helps
    
    JD
27.704Lets not beat a dead horse any more...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 08 1990 18:4323
    re: -1
    
    Joe, it's no use discussing it. CU and NU fans do not see eye to eye.
    
    How about lets just say that it is an unfortunate incident for all
    partys involved. It's not good for both teams because of the bad press
    and fan reaction. CU won the game but people around the country will
    respect them less. Not that this is CU's fault. They are simply
    reacting like anyone would. They must take the win. But it "looks" bad.
    From Mizzou standpoint it looks better because they got screwed, * BUT *
    they loose the game.
    
    It's unfortunate for CU, MU, Big-8, and college football.
    
    Speaking of Mizzou. They play at Nebraska this week. Up untill the last
    few years (When Mizzou has been really bad) they have ALWAYS given
    NU a tough game. They beat NU in '78 and game them some scares in
    the '80s. It's kind of a rivalry. It will be interesting to see how
    the Tigers play Saturday. Any thoughts from anyone? Also, OU meets
    their hated rival Texas. Texas has improved. Any thoughts about this
    one?
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.705PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Oct 08 1990 19:2522
>    It will be interesting to see how
>    the Tigers play Saturday. Any thoughts from anyone? Also, OU meets
>    their hated rival Texas. Texas has improved. Any thoughts about this
>    one?
    
     I'd bet that NU beats Mizzou by 3+ touchdowns since they're not playin
     on the trick field. I'm sure CU would have won by at least 2 touchdowns
     if the game was in any other stadium.

     OU-Texas. This will be a good test for OU and one where people can start
     to compare CU and OU since Texas is a common opponent. If it's in
     Norman, I'd pick the Sooner's by 10-14 points. If it's in Texas, I'd
     pick OU by 3.

     In regards to the CU/Mizzou game, it's a real tradegy for everybody.
     If the game was officiated correctly, CU would not have spiked the
     ball on 4th down (which everybody including the refs thought was 3rd 
     down). They would have run the play and nobody knows if CU would have 
     scored or not. End result, everybody ends up a loser.

					Keith
27.706On to next weekBSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Mon Oct 08 1990 20:0219
    
>    Joe, it's no use discussing it. CU and NU fans do not see eye to eye.
    
    Okay, sounds good.  Besides, you're right, CU and NU fans indeed don't
    see eye to eye.  Hey, we agreed on something!
    
    RE: OU-Texas    
    This game is being played in the Cotton Bowl in Dallas, which is
    approximately midway between the 2 universities.  If I'm not mistaken,
    the tickets are evenly distributed between the 2 schools, so it is
    truly a neutral site.  I like the Sooners in this game, although it
    should be (and usually is) a good one.
    
    Hagan should start against Iowa State, and I don't think CU will have
    any trouble with ISU.  Of course, I didn't think CU would have any
    trouble with Mizzou either.  Also, I would say Mizzou will have a tough
    time with the game being in Lincoln.  Huskers easily.
    
    Joe
27.707Bieniemy-CU's All-Time Top RusherDENVER::HITEMon Oct 08 1990 20:2417
    Saturday, Eric Bieniemy became the University of Colorado's all-time
    leading rusher.  Here's an excerpt from the Rocky Mountain News.
    
    			CU's Top All-Time Rushers
    
    Player		Years		Att		Yards		Avg
    
    Eric Bieniemy	1987-90		550		3,047		5.5
    Charlie Davis	1971-73		538		2,958		5.5
    James Mayberry	1975-78		546		2,548		4.7
    Bobby Anderson	1967-69		568		2,367		4.2
    Lee Rouson		1981-84		581		2,296		4.0
    Kayo Lam		1933-35		433		2,140		4.9
    J. J. Flanagan	1987-89		328		2,096		6.4
    Merwin Hodel	1949-51		502		2,102		4.2
    
    Jrh    	
27.708Jayhawk Cyclone Tie GameDENVER::HITEJoin Toastmasters, Build on Your StrengthsMon Oct 08 1990 20:294
    Does anyone know anything about the Kansas/Iowa State game.  It ended
    in a tie.
    
    Jrh
27.709???MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Tue Oct 09 1990 09:225
    
    Wonder which Bowl will host the Colorado - Mizzou rematch?
    
    Bob V.
    
27.710Officials SuspendedMILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Tue Oct 09 1990 09:3511
    re .700
    
    JH, what is your source of information that says the clock was 
    NOT officially signaled to start on CU's first first first down?
    
    Bob V.
    
    
    p.s.  ALL the officials involved with the game have been put on 
          indefinate suspension by the Big 8!
    
27.711FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Oct 09 1990 10:4147
    Bob, 
    
    I never said I had any inside information on this.  What I was trying
    to say was that the ball was either ready for play or not ready for
    play.  After the clock is stopped and the chains are moved, the referee
    will signal for the clock to start and at that point, the ball is ready
    for play.  If he had signalled for the clock to start, the ball could
    legally be snapped, Colorado did run a legal play that should have
    counted and they cannot be penalized for delay of game.  This is
    probably where the error in keeping track of the downs took place, and
    given the Big 8 has admitted the error and suspended the officials,
    this is the more likely scenario.
      
    Now, if the officials hadn't signalled the ball ready for play and
    Colorado ran a play they shouldn't have run to spike the ball, the
    point I was trying to make was first, the officials should have stopped
    the ball from being snapped until the clock was started.  In any
    situation I've ever seen the officials either hold the offense in the
    huddle or at the line until they say it's ready.  It's their job to
    prevent this from happening but if a team should snap the ball before
    it's called ready to be snapped, I don't think the team is penalized
    for it.
    
    My point was no matter what happened the officials blew it, either by
    losing track of the downs or by failing to prevent a play from being
    run that shouldn't have been run.
    
    The Big 8 issued a statement yesterday.  Not only did they suspend the
    officials but have said the Colorado victory will stand.  "it has been
    determined that, in accordance with the football playing rules, the
    allowance of the fifth down to Colorado is not a postgame correctable
    error" according to Big 8 Commissioner Carl James.  From that
    statement, the most likely occurrence is the officials did lose track
    of the downs.
    
    I think a lot of us in here dislike Colorado.  Besides the rivalries
    with people from other Big 8 schools, there is the same appearance of
    over-fanaticism we get from the fans of the other football team in
    Colorado, the Broncos.  Also, I don't like the way Colorado continues
    to milk the Sal Aunese situation.  I hope they still aren't milking it
    after all the players who knew him have graduated like the Yankees did
    with Thurman Munson for so long.  We shouldn't let our dislike for
    Colorado prevent us from admitting one thing - Colorado won the game
    and it's not their fault they did (by that I mean they shouldn't be
    bashed for winning a game due to an error made by the officials).
    
    John
27.712What a jokeCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleTue Oct 09 1990 10:575
    re .707
    
    CU has not had very many good running backs if Bienemy is the leading
    rusher with just over 3000 yds...
    
27.713GENRAL::WADEBye bye Ms. American PieTue Oct 09 1990 11:047
    <sigh>
    
    	Sal's name hasn't even been mentioned by the Buffs this
    	year.  A few reporters have posed questions to Mac about
    	Sal and he has brushed them off.
    
    Claybone_the_over_fanatic
27.714Go Big Red...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Oct 09 1990 11:528
    The suspension of the 7 refs by the Big-8 is an obvious admission
    of guilt. Still, the Big-8 used the only correct option by granting CU
    the win.
    
    Wishing I could be in Lincoln this Saturday... Huskers gonna have
    Tiger for lunch.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.715FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Oct 09 1990 12:035
    I stand corrected on that part of it but they still wear Sal's name on
    the uniform.  Usually, when a team is mourning a fallen member, one
    year is all they do it for.
    
    John
27.716QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Oct 09 1990 14:4132
27.717Humble PieFSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Oct 09 1990 15:5549
    Mike,
    
    My underwear isn't too tight today.  I can't really explain adequately
    what I mean about the over-fanaticism, so I better not try.  In fact,
    I've tried to write 2-3 different paragraphs about what I've meant and
    I can't.  What I was trying to do with it was tell everyone about how
    they shouldn't bash the Buffs for winning a game through an error, and
    how they shouldn't let any anti-Buff bias color it.  I shouldn't have
    tried to explain the anti-Buff bias and use a perception about Buff and
    Bronco fans to do so, making an incorrect generalization and for that I
    apologize.
    
    If anything, I would tend to favor Missouri in this situation because I
    know a couple of their football coaches.  Much as I would have
    preferred Missouri to win, I was trying to make the point that Colorado
    shouldn't be blamed for winning and keeping the win due to an officials
    error.  But I couldn't explain it right and I didn't explain it well.
    
    It is my personal perception that Bronco fans in general tend to overdo
    it.  It's probably the same perception many of you have about Celtics
    fans.  The everyone wearing orange, the TV crews setting up trailers at
    training camp and living there, every station with a Broncos show, and
    things of that nature give me the perception (which may or may not be
    true) that Bronco Mania tends to be a bit overdone.  It's kind of like
    seeing the Redskins fans wearing the hog noses.  Yeah it's OK but it
    looks pretty ridiculous and it's somewhat overdone. 
    
    Also, because my favorite team in the Boston area is the Patriots it
    makes me jealous that we aren't supported that way.  Another thing for
    me is that I've been trained to watch sporting events quietly and with
    a sense of not being caught up in the action because I've had another
    job to do during a game, which makes it hard for me to understand
    people at times going nuts and doing what seems to be silly in support
    of their team.
    
    I also apologize for my mis-statement about Aunese continuing.  I was
    unaware that McCartney had refused comment on it, but I have read
    articles about the players still dedicating the season to him, raising
    their helmets to him at the end of the game, maintaining his locker as
    a shrine and so forth.  It was OK to use him as an inspiration last
    year and it worked, but it seemed and still seems pretty morbid.
    
    It's kind of like the argument about celebrating vs taunting.  It's in
    the eye of the beholder.  Dan is right - if it's your team it's OK and
    if it's the other team, it's not.
    
    Still noting buddies?
    
    John
27.720QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Oct 09 1990 16:3628
   I think I see the point, John.
   It's probably because Colorado is the next largest concentration of
   Noters outside of the People's Republic of Mass.
   There's more of us, so the boosterism probably appears more strident.
   As Stephen pointed out, there's not a lot of Sports teams to choose
   from around here (so I well understand the maniacal gleam in the eyes
   of Nebraskans when Saturday rolls around).
   Also, the Donks have been relatively successful of late (how many
   Superbowls HAVE we won, anyway? Everybody keeps asking me.)
   I would guess in `85', when the Pats were kicking some ass, there were
   folks in here who thought THEY were overfanatical.

   Regarding CU... I never brought it up, because I figured I would be
   screamed down; but, I was kinda hoping they'd give up the game. They're
   not going to win a National Title this year, anyway. But if they're
   good they could still beat NU and OU for the Big 8 title, whether the
   Missouri game counts as a win or a loss. It would have been a real
   classy thing to do. It'd be remembered as an honorable gesture long
   after Sal what-his-name was forgotten.

   By the way. I didn't expect an apology. I've always thought you were a
   super noter, and I enjoy the insight and perspective you bring to a
   discussion. (I was also extra tickled to find out you can be real goofy
   and wear beachballs on your haid.) So when I saw your note, I thought:
   ` NOW what the heck did I do!?!?! '

   Mike JN

27.721FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Oct 09 1990 16:497
    I'm glad you see the point, Mike.  That's sort of what I was trying to
    say.  
    
    One small nit, though - I didn't wear the beachball on my haid.  I
    destroyed the beachball.  Jeff Needle wore it.
    
    John
27.722colorado football fansDENVER::HITEJOINTOASTMASTERSBUILDONYOURSTRENGTHSTue Oct 09 1990 17:2029
    Just a brief demographic view of the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky 
    Mountains (Ft Collins, Boulder, Denver, Colorado Springs, Pueblo). 
    Over the last 15 years, this area has experienced a tremendous amount
    of growth.  In fact, most of the people who live in this region are
    originally from outside of Colorado.  But we are all Coloradoans and I
    personally feel that the Broncos serve as a unifying factor.  We might
    all be from different parts of the country, but we have the Broncos in
    common.
    
    On the other hand, I'd say many, if not most, of the Colorado Buff
    fans are former alums.  I think frequently fans who have allegiance for
    colleges are former alums or have other reasons for backing the team,
    other than merely living in the same town.
    
    I work in a District office in Denver, and only a handful of us (out of
    over 300) actively follow Colorado football (that means, CU, Air Force,
    Colorado State) whereas most of us are Bronco fans.
    
    My point is that Bronco fans and CU fans are not necessarily the same
    people.  And this is not to diminish either sets of fans.  I happen to
    be a member of both sets.
    
    Just wanted to give you a different perspective on Colorado football
    fans.
    
    Jan Hite
    
    
    alums.
27.723Different manias...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Oct 09 1990 17:3833
    Until I was 32 I lived in Nebraska (Omaha), I now live in Colorado,
    and I have spent many many weeks at Bedford Mass.
    
    I've seen Celtic mania, Bronco mania, Buffs mania, and Husker mania
    all up close.
    
    The most desperite one is Husker mania. This is because there is
    litteraly no other big-time sports in the state. If NU looses then
    that's it baby - NO OTHER OPTIONS !!! Nebraska people live or die
    by the Huskers.
    
    The most arrogant mania is Celtics mania. This is for obvious reasons.
    16 world championships etc...
    
    The most bandwagon type one is Buffmania. Not that there arent a lot of
    true gold fans out there though.
    
    The most illogical and crazy ones are the BrocoManiaItes. No question
    about it.
    
    One thing is for sure:
    
    	Husker maniaITES wear RED glasses
    	Bronco maniaITES wear ORANGE glasses
    	Celtics maniaITES wear GREEN glasses
    	Buffalo ManiaITES wear GOLD glasses
    
    I have terrible vision problems because I wear RED, GREEN, and K.C.
    Royal BLUE glasses all at the same time.    ;^)
    
    Just my 2 cents worth.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.724QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Oct 09 1990 17:5019
   That's a good observation, Jan (  Are you a male Jan or a female Jan?
   [no offense intended; I've known several of both] ).

   When I moved out here, I was a dyed in the wool Bears fan, but made up
   my mind to `adopt' the team of my new home (and a pretty sad team they
   were; it wasn't often they played as well as .500 ball in a season). I
   still retained a fondness for the Bears though, and most of the people
   I know have done pretty much the same thing. They adopt the Broncos in
   the spirit of having ties to the area, but still root for their `old'
   teams as well (except when their `old' team is in the AFC West, also.
   Then they still hate the Donks).

   As for local college teams... no big ties at all. I went to UNC for my
   Masters since I've been out here, and couldn't tell you what their team
   nickname is. Colorado and Airforce, I generally wish well, just `cause
   they're in the area. It wasn't until last year's GOOD CU team that I
   even started paying much attention to them. 

   Mike JN
27.725GENRAL::WADEBye bye Ms. American PieTue Oct 09 1990 18:0611
    Mikey,
    
    	You'll be glad to know that UNC's mascot is
    
    
    
    			     THE BEARS!
    
    	There, now you have a new team to root for ;^)
    
    Claybone
27.726former UNCiteBSS::MENDEZTue Oct 09 1990 19:2413
    .724
    
    Mike I am also a recent attendee of UNC.  You do mean the University
    of Northern Colorado don't you?  I graduated in 1981, how about you?
    
    The bears are doing pretty good in their football conference this year?
    
    I must admit though, that the students in Greeley do not follow sports
    much at all.  They are more interested in where the next party is.
    
    Frank Mendez
    
    
27.727Jan is for JanisDENVER::HITEJOINTOASTMASTERSBUILDONYOURSTRENGTHSTue Oct 09 1990 20:076
    To Mike of .724
    
    I am Janis Ruthellen Hite, a female alum of CU, native of Colorado and
    loyal rooter for all Colorado teams.
    
    Jan
27.728A neat story...HUSKER::NU_POWERCoach Osborne, Get a Passing Life !!!Wed Oct 10 1990 01:2541
Nebraska's defensive lineman Kenny Walker has been deaf since age 2. He
is a great human interest story...

		OREGON STATE'S PLAYERS PRAISE NEBRASKA'S WALKER
						by Steve Sinclair
						Omaha World-Herald


	Lincoln-Nebraska's defensive tackle Kenny Walker is the best, 
	Oregon State QB Matt Booher said.

	"I've only played against one player in hes league, and that's 
	Junior Seau," Booher said, comparing the Cornhusker senior with
	the former All-American linebacker from Southern Cal, an NFL first-
	round draft pick last spring.

	"I think he's better than Jounior Seau. He's bigger, stronger and 
	faster. I'm so impressed by his play. He's awesome."

	Walker contributed seven tackles, including five for losses of 33
	yards, and broke up two passes in NU's 31-7 victory Saturday over 
	the Beavers.

	Brad D'Ancona, a g-foot-3, 290-pound offensive tackle, had the
	enenviable assignment of blocking Walker most of the game.

	"I understand he's deaf," D'Ancona said. "That's amazing to me. 
	From what I understand, the deaf lose a lot of the sense of balance.
	He's an amazing athlete. I have all the respect for him in the 
	world."

	Walker has been deaf since the age of 2.

	"He came off the ball a split-second slower than anyone else just 
	because he had to watch," D'Ancona said. "But he made up for it 
	just being the athlete he is. He's an amazing guy. He will be 
	playing Sundays (in the NFL) for sure."

	Oren State coach Dave Kragthorpe also praised Walker. "He's a very 
	good player,: he said. "We considered him their best defensive
	lineman."
27.729Thanks for sharing that!!RAVEN1::M_PHILLIPSFlirting With DisasterWed Oct 10 1990 07:335
    That's really great!!!! He must be one h*ll of a guy to be as good as
    they say he is!! I will have to look for him, if I ever see them play!
    
    
                                                        M.J.
27.730Also when they play the Okie's...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Oct 10 1990 11:516
    re: -1
    
    You should be able to catch him Nov. 3rd on TV when Colorado plays
    at Nebraska.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.731The jokes are startin ta fly...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Oct 10 1990 14:249
    Hey, did ya hear that all 7 of the CU-Mizzou refs have gotten new
    jobs already...
    
    
    They're gonna be math professors at the University of Colorado !!!
    
    Yuk, yuk ha, ha
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.732Do me a favor, pleaseSHALOT::MEDVIDmy apple tree, my brightnessWed Oct 10 1990 14:4111
    I did a set seen on SPORTS the other day when there were a few hundred
    unread notes after my return from Europe.  This controversy interests
    me, but I really don't know what it is.  There are 50+ notes since
    Monday.  Would somebody please point me to the definitive note or
    summarize with a reply.
    
    In other words: WHAT HAPPENED?!?
    
    Thanks, dudes.
    
    	--dan'l
27.733Hard to believeSHALOT::HUNTWyld Stallyns RulesWed Oct 10 1990 14:4811
    Daniel,
    
    Colorado beat Missouri, 33-31, with a touchdown on the last play of the
    game.   Unfortunately for Mizzou, it was *FIFTH* down.
    
    Television replays clearly showed that Colorado was given five chances
    to score and did so on the fifth chance as time ran out.
    
    The referees have been suspended but the game result stands as is.
    
    Bob Hunt
27.734CAM::WAYBeaten like a redheaded stepchild...Wed Oct 10 1990 14:5413
Bob,

That is incredible.  I don't usually follow this note, so this is the
first I've heard of it.

That's akin to an ump forgetting, no, make that all FOUR umps forgetting
how many outs there are.....

Unreal.

I wonder if the refs will be having to pee in a cup?

'Saw
27.735Unfortunate incident...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Oct 10 1990 14:5519
    Quick explanation:
    
    	CU down by more than a field goal and less than a TD with time
    running out.
    
    CU drives and in the final seconds have a 1st and goal. The final
    series is the controversy. After the second down play the down-keeper
    failed to flip the down marker to 3rd down. No one notices the mistake.
    (At least CU and McArtney wont ADMIT to noticing it) Therefore CU gets
    a 5th down. And they score the winning TK on 5th down.
    
    The Big-8 has suspended all 7 refs and upheld the win for CU. The 
    rule is that if the refs make a mistake on downs, after the bad down
    is completed it cannot be reversed. CU wins, MU gets shaft.
    
    Nebraska plays Mizzou this Saturday and it's not gonna take a 5th down
    for NU to beat the Tigers. Mark my words !!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.736QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Oct 10 1990 14:589
   Bears, hey? That do sound familiar.

   Hi Janis Ruthellen Hite! 
   Any relation to Shere?
   You're something of a rarity. I know hundreds of people in Colorado,
   and only a few of them are natives.
   What do you want to name the baseball team (if we ever get it)?

   Mike JN
27.737Thanks, dudesSHALOT::MEDVIDmy apple tree, my brightnessWed Oct 10 1990 18:477
    Thanks for the summaries.  Amazing.
    
    Didn't something similar happen to Ohio State back in '83 or '84? 
    Tomzack was the QB.  Either they got 5 downs or they only got 3.  I
    can't remember.  
    
    	--dan'l
27.738AXIS::ROBICHAUDDockers...Pants for |CENSORED|sThu Oct 11 1990 08:312
    	...and Dan'l to top it off, Colorado refuses to do the *manly*
    thing and forfeit the game!
27.739???MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Thu Oct 11 1990 09:4612
    
    Based on comments in the National, the Chain-gang chief FORGOT to
    flip the down marker during the time out giving CU two 2nd downs.
    
    Where were the other officials?
    
    Where was the Mizzou coaching staff?
    
    What did McCartney know and when did he know it?
    
    Bob V.
    
27.740from out of the cob websMFGMEM::MIOLAPhantomThu Oct 11 1990 09:538
    
    
    The same thing happened to BC against either WV or Syracuse a few years
    back, I believe it cost them the game.
    
    
    
    Lou
27.741FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Oct 11 1990 09:567
    No matter what the chain crew did, it's still the ultimate
    responsibility of the officiating crew in general, and the head
    linesman in particular, to keep track of the downs.  Major league
    umpires use a hand-held indicator to keep track of balls, strikes outs
    and runs and never rely on the scoreboard to do so.
    
    John
27.742MU FOOTBALL IS BACK...!!!CSS::GORDONThu Oct 11 1990 12:53114
		MISSOURI 31	COLORADO 27
		---------------------------

	I was at the game SAT. in Missouri. We were down for parents
weekend, my daughter is a soph. majoring in journalism. Guess we got
lucky in that was told by some that have seen many games there that it
was the best game ever played there. Being my first college football
game I expected a rout by C.U. but instead got to see a great game....


Anyway a few comments on the game:
----------------------------------

there was no T.D.
-----------------
Five downs or not, what was never mentioned by anyone was the fact that
on the fifth down Johnson was down on his back short of the goal line....

He then rolls over on his right side and places the ball over the goal
line...in one sequence of photo's there is a ref looking right at the play
but never blows the play dead, and this same ref does not even signal a
touchdown when he rolls over and places the ball over the goal...the ref
that signals it is at the goal line on the opposite side of the field...


Now when I played football, when you were down the play was over, in fact
many time Sat. players carring the ball for both teams lost their footing
and the play was whistled dead...also when I played the ball was always
spotted where the shoulders were after you were down...so unless the rules
have changed alot....C.U. never scored on the fifth down....!!!!!!! all
that happened was that the ref who signaled the T.D. first, ONLY SAW THE
BALL CROSS THE GOAL LINE... THE OTHERS, ESPECIALLY THE ONE WHO IS RIGHT BEHIND
WHERE THE C.U. LINE HAD BEEN, WERE NOT DOING THEIR JOB IN THAT THE PLAY SHOULD
HAVE ENDED WHEN THE BALL CARRIER WAS DOWN....

	So in my book they never scored five downs or four...MU held them
for FIVE DOWNS short of the goal line...the ref's screwed up another one...


on the five downs
-----------------
It appeared that the M.U. coach had no knowledge of the five downs until
the team had left the field, both teams left and had to come back to run
the extra point try...guess the reasoning was that MU could get ball on
fumble and score a safety and the game would be tied..of course CU just
took the snap and fell to the ground....when they came back was when the
MU coach was talking with an official and kept showing five fingers all
the time he's talking...of course at that point the fifth down snap had
already taken place so I guess it was at that point uncorrectable....
	I assume at this point the CU coach also knew as both teams I
assume also keep a set of books...

	You had to be at the game to appreciate the intensity and situation
toward the end especially with about 8 seconds left, the fans surrounding the
field, etc. It has to be tough on an official and mistakes we all make,
hell the guy responsible for flipping the downs marker on the sideline
is a 1967 MU graduate, the CU coach I was told is also a MU grad....


on politicians
--------------
reporters in the press box and play by play announcers were knowledgeable
about the fifth down while it was taking place, the Big Eight commissioner
was in the press box area as he attended the game, WHY WAS HE UNABLE TO
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT BEFORE IT WAS ALLOWED TO CONTINUE???? Of course his
actions and comments right after the game implies he's nothing more than
a figurehead anyway....he really showed a lot of leadership qualities(sic)


on THE FIELD
------------
the field conditions did seem to be suspect as BOTH teams had trouble
keeping their footing as they made quick cuts. Would it have made a difference
is something we'll never know. The CU's coaches comments about it after the
game implied CU would have scored two or three more touchdowns if the 
conditions were different, but what he failed to mention was the there were
plays where MU lost their footing that could have resulted in about two or
three more TD's for them also....funny the CU coach never found a problem
the last two years there when he was winning big...???


on CU FOOTBALL
--------------
Tailback Eric Bieniemy from CU is a GREAT football player. That kid has
blinding speed and knows how to follow his blockers and then pick the holes
better that anyone I've seen since Jimmy Brown (for some of you too young
to remember Jim Brown was the original OJ Simpson only better)...

CU has a great offensive line and potent running attack, I wish I could
see them with their QB (he was injured and only went a couple of plays Sat
then took himself out because his shoulder was still bothering him) to make
a determination if they are a balanced team i.e. both air and ground attack.

on MU FOOTBALL
--------------
Last year my daughter kept saying to us OUR QB always throws to the other
team so this year when we found out we were going and going to see a
football game while we were there I figured I see a blowout of MU. MU doesn't
appear to have a running attach at all. I really had trouble understanding 
this becaue their off. line would give their QB all the time in the world
to throw but when it came to runs the def team would bowl them over and
usually cause a loss of yardage...anyway saw a great game and guess MU
football is back. My daughter was laughing saying after MU got beat in their
first game, which they figured they would win big, alot of her friends were
selling their student season passes and so were other students but now they
all want to go to the games and have to pay....

on MU
-----
Our daughter has made a great choice of colleges. The college is excellent
and we are extremely proud of her. I hope she continues for all four years.
We were impressed with BIG EIGHT COUNTRY, being from New England and having 
U.N.H. right next door and all the colleges in Boston and the surounding
area it was a very worthwhile experience...
27.743FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Thu Oct 11 1990 13:257
    The Big Eight Commissioner could have only done something if he'd known
    about it and if he had a way to get word to the referee.  In the NFL,
    because we have replay, if that had happened we could have called the
    replay booth and had the communicator get in touch with the umpire on
    the field.
    
    John
27.744Tigers at HuskersBSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Oct 11 1990 13:2613
re: .742
    
    Thanks for the perspective from the MU side. All I've been hearing
    in the press in Co. this week is the CU perspective and Mr. Self-
    Righteous Cry Baby McArtney whineing about this and that and squacking
    about the field etc...  It's sickening.
        
    Anyway, I'd like to hear what you think about this weeks game for
    Mizzou at Lincoln Nebraska. Missouri has been a long time rival of
    Nebraska and usually gives then a tough game. Do you think the boys
    from Columbia can keep up with the boys from Lincoln this year ???
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.745more on MIZZOU...CSS::GORDONThu Oct 11 1990 13:3738
    other comments from MU
    
    my son got Doug Smiths autograph while we were there, we were going
    into bookstore and my daughters boyfriend says there's smith and my
    son being a good basketball player and 14 goes over and ask for an
    autograph. He got it for and gave it to one of his friends....Smith
    broke his hand in the trunk of and automobile but should be ready to
    play when bball starts...the cast was off
    
    peeler is awaiting grades to close for first semester as he was close
    to 1.??? and according to rumors on campus he may not be eliglable to
    play...
    
    of course it was Ford(?) who transfered to Kentucky...rumor was that
    he felt that the NCAA was going to go hard on MU after their
    investigation was complete on the basketball violations....
    
    NCAA supposedly had there final meeting on the MU basketball
    allagations last week in K.C.
    
    my son got to play hoop at the rec center on campus with daughters
    boyfriend. They played Fri night/Sat. night/ sun night he played
    racketball and squash for the first time in his life and loved it...
    basically it was pickup game and there were some good/average/and
    lousy players there as in any gym...
    
    rec center is great as it has many courst as well as workout rooms,
    running area/racketball/squash and I'm sure other thing I never saw...
    
    Hearns Center reminded me of the GARDEN as it is the old style
    basketball building...what I mean by that is it was cement construction
    with the chairs for audience just like the garden in boston...not
    impressive when you've been in the Coloseum in L.A. or some of the
    newer pro ones and the only college one I can compare to is U.N.H. or
    Plymouth State...of course compared to either of those it was
    fantastic...!!!
    
    
27.746good luck to both MU and NABRASKA...CSS::GORDONThu Oct 11 1990 13:4923
    re: .744
    
    hey this was my first(other than U.N.H. twice about three years ago)
    college football game. I'm not a football follower, basketball is
    my game but from what my daughter said all last year about how bad
    MU football was and from what I saw and read/heard while down there
    I can only say the following:
    
    I don't think from what I saw MU is ready yet to be a consistant
    quality team ala Michigan(who is my son's team he was estatic when
    the ND lost to Stanford(?) was put on scoreboard SAT.) any good
    coach will just key on their passing game as it seems to be all they
    have...to be good in football I think you have to have quality in
    all phases...passing/running/defense..
    
    I'll certainly be watching for a score this weekend though because it
    will be interesting to see if MU continues on a high(they feel they won
    beating TWO national ranked teams two weeks in a row) and really takes
    it to the huskies(?)...you know sometimes a so-so team can do alot
    while playing on emotion and I guess that means they can be
    dangerous...
    
    
27.747it cost $$$$$....CSS::GORDONThu Oct 11 1990 14:1127
    re: .743
    
    according to one of the local reporters in the local paper Sun.
    one of the commissioners assistants that was in the box with him
    came down to the field and confered with officials while they were
    awaiting for the two teams to come back to the field...as to what
    they were confering about we'll never know but the implication is the
    commissioner KNEW at that point just as did the coaches from both
    teams...of course where the rules do not allow an error to be corrected
    after the next play has been run...!!!
    
    you can bet when the rules comm. meets this year there will most
    likely be some lively discussion on how to amend the rules so this
    cannot happen again...god forbid if something like that would happen
    in a REALLY IMPORTANT GAME such as a college bowl game or a game
    that means the top rating for a college football team...remember we're
    talking BUCKS here...they figure that mistake could cost MU about
    1/2 million on the premis that if they won they could have moved up
    enough in rankings to maybe get a bowl bid(toliet?) bid somewhere
    if they continued to have a good season...I'm not putting MU down
    with the toliet bowl bid just trying to explain that I assume they
    mean some minor obscure bowl bid somewhere...but the point is BUCKS
    are involved here folks and ALL the colleges will find it's in there
    best interest to amend this/these rules so this can be corrected if
    the situation happens again...it's for better minds than us to figure
    out...  ;^)
    
27.748CSC32::GL_JOHNSONHomie D. Clown!Thu Oct 11 1990 17:4631
    
    	Question for you /Don:  If Nebraska or Notre Dame won like CU did 
    last week, do you think they would forfeit the game?  Better question
    is:  would they be *expected* to?  Probably not, IMO.  I don't expect
    opinions to change since some(or most according to J. Hendry) are very 
    anti-CU biased.  
    
    	I saw the clips of the last series and there's no doubt that CU
    got 5 downs; the result of an inexcusable error by the officials.  I think
    the right thing was done with the game officials being suspended for
    an indefinite period of time.  I don't think CU should forfeit the 
    victory.
    
    	As far as the perception that CU fans are akin to Bronco fans, this is 
    gross misrepresentation.  They have one of their best seasons in well
    over a decade, with plenty of enthusiastic fan support, and all of a sudden
    CU fans are arrogant, rabid, and the like.  CU fans are, for the most
    part, not as vocal like Bronco fans are.  I also don't see CU having
    a manic following like the Broncos do.  Most CU fans are either natives
    of Colo., alumni, or are from somewhere else and follow them because
    they're the local big time NCAA program, which is why I follow them.
    It may appear that there's lots of bandwagon jumpers.  That's because
    CU fans of any sport(except for skiing) haven't had much to cheer about
    in years.    
    
          As far as the "SAL" thing, the only ones making a big deal of it 
    are the other Big 8 teams and some others around the country.  It is a 
    new year with new challenges.  The team and the fans know that Sal is 
    nothing but a memory now.  Which is how it should be.
    
                                                 glen j.
27.749Look in the mirror, coach...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 11 1990 18:1321
    
    Since CU threw the ball away intentionally on what they thought was
    third down, they should neither have to forfeit nor apologize for the
    victory.  Purely an officials' mistake which both teams had to play
    under, which didn't affect the game to the extent that I originally
    thought because of the wasted down.
    
    However, after seeing both a clip of McArtney and reading his
    quotes, I'll have to agree with Marty that he appears to be something
    of a whiner.  I'm no Buff-basher and naturally Marty in all his 
    objectivity overdid it, but McArtney was definitely sounding smug
    saying that he wouldn't even think about giving a victory to Missouri 
    because they didn't deserve it due to the field conditions.  This is
    poor little Missouri he's talking about here, not Nebraska or Oklahoma!
    He could have shown just a little graciousness, and not the contempt 
    towards Missouri that he did.  Fact is, Colorado hasn't played an 
    all-around dominating game yet, and have had to pull it out or just 
    hang on in every one of them, field conditions or no.
    
    glenn
               
27.750It was too much of a temptation...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Oct 11 1990 18:2716
    re: .749
    
>         ...I'm no Buff-basher and naturally Marty in all his 
>    objectivity overdid it...
    
    After all the "sour grapes" krap I was accused of last year I just
    could not help myself from a little harmless indulgence.
    
    Maaaan it was fun. However I do know that, as usual, if anything
    happens to the Huskers...
    
    
    			I'm in big time TROUBLE !!!!!!       ;^)
    
    Nebraska_Marty_Who_Will_Be_In_The_Stands_In_Lincoln_Wearing_RED_This_
    November_3rd_GO_BIG_RED_!!!
27.751Could be a good game...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Oct 12 1990 14:5013
    Whoa !!! I see Nebraska is favored by 27 over Missouri in the USA
    today.
    
    I dont think NU will win by that much. Mizzou has a history of "staying
    with" Nebraska in games and making them close. Tigers are out for blood
    now after last week I bet. 
    
    I think NU will win by only about 2 TD's and maybee one of those
    comming late.
    
    However, the mighty Huskers * WILL * prevail !!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.752Nebraska Football Radio Network...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Sun Oct 14 1990 15:0629
    re: -1
    
    Well, I was wrong again !!!  NU 69 - MU 21.
    
    "That score outta put a lump in Coach McArtney's throat"
    
    That's a quote from Saturdays Nebraska Football Network broadcast of
    the Nebraska game by the voice of the Huskers - Kent Pavelka. The quote
    came when it was 48 - 14 IN THE FIRST HALF !!!!
    
    The parent station is Omaha's KFAB 1110 AM. There is a front range
    station in Longmont that carries the KFAB Nebraska Network broadcast
    also - 1060 AM (Cant remember the call letters). I was able to pick
    this station up very well on my home stereo in Woodland Park. KFAB
    can be picked up well at night along the front range.
    
    The key to this game, according to the Nebraska Football Network is that 
    Coach Osborne had "a little talk" with his offense about it's sluggish
    and unmotivated play thus far. The results were that they just
    destroyed a Mizzou team that beat 2 top 25 teams the last 2 weeks
    (although they only got credit for one of the victories).
    
    Mizzou's QB completed 50% of his passes as opposed to his season
    average of 64%. He did get over 200 yards in the air thought.
    
    I'd have to say that Nebraska is looking tougher now after this one.
    But they still haven't been tested by a really good team yet.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.753Another one bites the dust...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Sun Oct 14 1990 16:318
    Because I was "living out" domestic bliss, I did not get so see the
    Oklahoma/Texas game.
    
    I heard that OU really outplayed Texas and that OU missed a long
    field goal at the end of the game. Are these things true? What happened
    to OU? Did they have fumbleites?
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.754They we were beat........period!!!!!RAVEN1::M_PHILLIPSFlirting With DisasterMon Oct 15 1990 03:111
    
27.755Tough GameRAVEN1::M_PHILLIPSFlirting With DisasterMon Oct 15 1990 03:135
    Nah!! I think OU killed themselves with that last play.......Having to
    rush the kicker and all that. Give Texas credit they beat a team that
    is normally better, but not that day!!!!!
    
                                              M.J.
27.756GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreMon Oct 15 1990 09:046
    
    Gee... I'm now waiting for Marty to rave on as to how Michigan State
    should concede the game to Michigan. 
    
    Dennis
    
27.757They are human...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 15 1990 11:387
    Hey, the 7 Big-8 refs got interim jobs before they start as 
    CU math professors...
    
    ...The Big-10 hired them as temporary refs.   Yaaaaaaaaahaaaaaa.
    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.758You CANNOT just single me out...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 15 1990 14:5713
    re: .756
    
    Hey, it aint just me. I read coach McArtneys quotes in the Co. Springs
    paper Sunday. He says he has gotten tons of mail EVERY day since the
    Mizzou game by people from both coasts, north and south saying that his
    post-game reactions have been, well lets just say, impropper. Heck, I'm
    not even the only one in this notesfile saying that. I realize that I
    may be the most outspoken and vocal. But point the finger correctly or
    not at all.
    
    Bring on CU and OU !!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.759Anyone have a box score on this one? Didn't make my paper...DELNI::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 15 1990 15:0443
    > I heard that OU really outplayed Texas and that OU missed a long
    > field goal at the end of the game. Are these things true? What happened
    > to OU? Did they have fumbleites?
    
    I tried to enter this before, but my system crashed midstream...
    
    Oklahoma did outplay Texas, but couldn't put the ball in the end zone
    (or through the uprights) when it counted.  Texas used a passing attack
    to score touchdowns on their first (or maybe it was second) and last
    drives of the game, and I think they had one first down the rest of the
    game.  Oklahoma even led in the takeaway/turnover category, and still
    lost.  The Sooners were dominating the line of scrimmage on both sides 
    of the ball, especially defensively, as Texas couldn't run and had
    difficulty most of the game passing against a strong rush.
    
    Gary Gibbs coached a very poor game.  Twice in the third quarter the
    Sooners moved the ball inside the ten, and came away with a total of 3
    points.  Gibbs insisted in slamming the ball up the middle into the
    face of a stacked Texas line, and if that weren't bad enough, on one
    third down and long up close he called some kind of a quarterback draw 
    with Cale Gundy, who fumbled.  Just a field goal there would have
    pretty much sealed the win.
    
    Gundy did a nice job a looked very good once Gibbs had to let him loose
    in the last-minute drive, converting on a few crucial third- and
    fourth-down situations.  I too couldn't understand running that last 
    play, making the field goal team rush onto the field with seconds to go.  
    The attempt itself was pure personal torture for me.  When the ball 
    left Lashar's foot, I thought for certain it was good from the shot 
    behind the kicker that ESPN gave us.  In fact, I started celebrating. 
    The ball appeared to be hooking from the right upright towards dead 
    center, but it was so high that it left the picture.  When it came back 
    into the picture it was above and slightly to left of the left upright.  
    The official's signal left me stunned.  Instant exhiliration to 
    despondency.
    
    Oh-and-two to Texas in games that should have not even have been close 
    (especially with this year's team) is not a good start for Coach Gibbs
    in Norman, I'm afraid.
    
    glenn
      
27.760Judgement call/Missed Down = Apples & OrangesBSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 15 1990 15:0511
    re: .756 again
    
    Besides, the CU mess-up was a missed down, the Michigan thing was
    a judgment call. There is a big difference.
    
    By the way, I did see the Michigan replay. I don't know about possession
    on the catch, but it was an obvious pass interference.
    
    It would be VERY hard for college to go to a reply system like the NFL.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.761I think all penalties are judgment callsBSS::MENDEZMon Oct 15 1990 15:5011
    Hey Marty
    If the play in question with Michigan and Michigan State was an
    obvious pass interference, then isn't that a missed call much like
    the CU fiasco?
    
    BTW my Dad and I both think that CU is gonna need more than 5 downs
    to come close to Nebraska.  I do not care for Nebraska but they seem
    to be playing pretty tough.
    
    Frank Mendez
    
27.762BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 15 1990 18:1827
    re: -1
    
    Frank, the CU thing wasent a "missed call" but rather an added down.
    There is a difference and I maintain that the added down was a worse
    offense than the bad call on pass interference.
    
    On the pass interference there is a chance that the ref just did not
    see the interference. Giving an added down is kind of like a basketball
    ref messing the clock up and adding 5 seconds to the game. Kind of like
    what happened to the US one year in Olympic basketball against the
    Ruskies.
    
    I agree that Michigan got screwed. But missing a split second happening
    like a pass interference is much different than adding a down. You wont
    see any refs suspended for a "judgement call" but you did see 7 refs
    suspended for adding a down.
    
    I know what some of you may be thinking. I am a Husker fan so I want
    ANY team rated above NU to lose and improve Nebraska's standing. This
    is true, that is my attitude. However, I have stated in here that I
    felt Michigan got screwed. I'd say this is evidence of need of replay
    in college ball, however I dont think you will ever see it. In the NFL
    it's not that hard because all games are televised at least somewhre.
    In college not all games are televised. Just think how much it would
    cost to equip ALL NCAA stadiums for it.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.763No ReplayFSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Oct 15 1990 20:1011
27.764Can you believe K-State won?DENVER::HITEJOINTOASTMASTERSBUILDONYOURSTRENGTHSMon Oct 15 1990 20:238
    Does anybody have any scoop on the new "powerhouse" of the Big 8 - 
    ***KANSAS STATE****
    
    I was amazed to hear that they had beaten Okie State.  Anybody see the
    game or have commentary on it.  I bet it was wild in Manhattan Saturday
    night--Kansas, that is!
    
    Jan
27.765FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Oct 16 1990 09:207
    Correction to my .763
    
    Replay could have been used to establish whether or not the receiver
    had possession prior to dropping the ball but not whether or not the
    receiver was interfered with.
    
    John
27.767BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Oct 16 1990 14:096
    re: -1
    
    I dissagree. Have you heard McArtney on KOA and in the papers letely?
    It's pretty bad.
    
    Nebraska Marty aka Husker Henderson or whatever...
27.768LUNER::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Tue Oct 16 1990 14:147
    re .763
    
    So ture. And ESPN kept harping on that game as an example of how
    instant replay could be applied. Bull. May be for the possession part
    (and that was tenuous), but not for P.I.
    
    But then again, Gammons and crew never let logic stop a polemic.
27.770OK, I admit it...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Oct 16 1990 14:266
    Hey Steven, no problem. However you were right to a degree...
    
    ...regardless of what McArtney is like, * I * am one HECK of a
    whiner !!!    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.771OSU=this year's BroncosPOGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipTue Oct 16 1990 20:3524
    > Does anybody have any scoop on the new "powerhouse" of the Big 8 - 
    > ***KANSAS STATE****
    
    > I was amazed to hear that they had beaten Okie State.  Anybody see the
    > game or have commentary on it.  I bet it was wild in Manhattan Saturday
    > night--Kansas, that is!
    
    > Jan
    
    I read a couple paragraphs about the game. KSU came back and won it
    after OSU was leading most of the game.  In OSU's defense, (of course)
    they are trying to replace Mike Gundy at QB with a pitcher who missed
    last year's spring practice because of grade problems plus an injured
    throwing arm.
    
    The BIG-8 is a bit strange this year.  CU is struggling against whoever
    they play.  OU looks good but against lowly OSU has to resort to
    passing the ball to be able to move it.  The Kansas teams are winning.
    Missouri has looked real tough--some times.  About the only teams
    that look like themselves are ISU and NU.  Its just too early to
    predict who will end up where.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.772BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Oct 23 1990 17:474
    Nebraska plays Iowa State who upset Oklahoma last week. How do you
    think the Huskers will do at ISU?
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.773NU is underratedRSST6::RIGGENBurley from bikingTue Oct 23 1990 18:1316
    Nebraska plays Iowa State who upset Oklahoma last week. How do you
    think the Huskers will do at ISU?
    
    Nebraska Marty
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


To use simple logic the Iowa State team had their win. The season is over 


Nebraska 51 
Iowa St. 14

Marty why are you not too upset that Nebraska isn't at least #2,
is it because you know the schedule NU schedule is even weaker than #1 UV's ?

27.774BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Oct 24 1990 10:479
    re: -1
    
    Yes, it is schedule related. I dont think the Huskers should be even
    number 2 right now. IF they beat CU and OU then I think at that point
    they should be rated number 1. They will have then proven themselves.
    Remember, Nebraska has an excellent vetern defense but the offense is
    VERY young. But the offense is very talented and speedy.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.775How did William & Mary do?MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Wed Oct 24 1990 10:5911
    
    Nebraska's "weak" non-conference opponents post a 2-1-1 record
    this past week end.
    
    Big X leader Minnesota trounced previously unbeaten Indiana.
    Baylor ties top 25 ranked Texas A&M.
    Northern Illinois again wins big.
    Oregon State falls to Washington State.
    
    Bob V.
    
27.776ND ahead of Nebraska is a JOKEBSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Wed Oct 24 1990 11:0026
    Latest AP Poll:
    
    1 UVA
    2 Auburn
    3 Shame
    4 Nebraska
    5 Illini
    
    Looking at this Communist poll, it's quite obvious that NU is severely
    ripped off IMO.  OK, their schedule is weak, but what about UVA's?? 
    If this poll was to stay the same the rest of the season, assuming all
    these top teams win the rest of their games, here's what could happen:
    UVA meets ND in the Citrus Bowl because Holtz cries his usual "we want
    to play the highest ranked team available", even though Auburn and NU
    are obviously tougher, more hard-nosed teams.  NU plays in the Orange
    and Auburn in the Sugar because of conference obligations.  NU finishes
    undefeated and untied, Auburn finishes with only a tie, and ND finishes
    with the 1 loss.  Now who do you think would get #1 in this situation?
    You're damm right, it would be almighty boys from ND, and would
    undoubtedly be the AP's worst tragedy, BYWho of '84 included.  Hey
    Tennessee, please save the AP some serious embarrasment and whip those
    Irish boys bad!
    
    GO VOLS!!!!!!!!
    
    Joe
27.777Undefeated would win it, guaranteedNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 24 1990 11:0812
    
    Guaranteed that if ND finishes with their one loss while Auburn and/or
    Nebraska end up with undefeated seasons including wins over tough
    opponents in the bowls, that ND does *not* finish #1.  Let the
    schedules catch up to ND's a little bit, boys.  The schedule
    differences are all that is reflected in the current poll.  Undefeated
    from a major conference playing in a major bowl *will* beat ND's one
    loss, don't worry.  Even ND has not established such a precedent to the
    contrary.
    
    glenn

27.778CNTROL::CHILDSDon't be fooled, vote YES on #3Wed Oct 24 1990 11:2413
 I don't quite remember the records Glenn but it seems to me I remember one
 year when Penn St was #1 lost to Alabama who I think was #2 or #3 while
 ND behind Montana beat Texas who was either #2 or #3 while ND was #4 yet
 ND won the title. 1977 is the year I think...

 While Stan White may not have impressed you, I haven't seen him yet he's
 certainly thrown up some big numbers and rallied his team from behind on
 a few occassions. I just can't believe that there aren't some seniors out
 there from smaller schools more deserving of that ranking than Meir...

 mike 

27.779SighSHALOT::HUNTNo. 1 Ranked Virginia CavaliersWed Oct 24 1990 11:2630
27.780More ...SHALOT::HUNTNo. 1 Ranked Virginia CavaliersWed Oct 24 1990 11:4127
27.781No precendent for NDNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 24 1990 12:0024
    
    > Notre Dame won and jumped all the way to No. 1 and the national title. 
    > They needed some losses by Nos. 2, 3, and 4 and I believe they got some
    > of that help although I don't recall the exact details.  I also believe
    > Joe Montana was the Irish quarterback under Dan Devine but I don't
    > recall him starring in *that* game.
    
    Oklahoma and Michigan lost but #3 Alabama crushed Ohio State.  ND
    leap-frogged Alabama in something of a shady deal but nowhere near as
    bad as implied in the original note.  (I could go either way.)  All the 
    top teams had one loss that year.  No one was undefeated.
    
    Never has an undefeated, untied team from a major conference finished 
    behind a defeated one, except when they used to take the vote *before* 
    the bowls (example: that wonderful Namath-led Alabama team in 1964 lost 
    in the bowls but had already been voted #1.)  Arizona St. from the WAC
    finished behind Oklahoma in 1975 and once-tied SMU finished behind Penn
    State in 1982 (SMU won a very lackluster Cotton Bowl 7-3 over Pitt).
    Neither case suggests that ND would hold up over an undefeated Auburn
    or Nebraska, especially since the Orange and Sugar Bowl games portend
    to be good ones.
    
    glenn
    
27.782But let's make sure the bowl matchups *do* prove itNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 24 1990 12:1038
    
    > Sigh.  Here we go again.  Virginia's got the *exact* same type of
    > football schedule they've struggled with for the past 25 years.  
    > They've upgraded their talent beyond their schedule.
    
    My argument has not been to condemn Virginia.  Only that they shouldn't
    be #1 based on a lack of evidence due to a weak schedule.  They are to 
    be commended for reaching the big time but not to be rewarded in any
    way out of sympathy for the past.
    
    > Nebraska, on the other hand, has continued to be the megaton talent
    > powerhouse it's always been but they've downgraded their schedule
    > considerably.   A far less nobler thing to do, in my book.
    
    > Next time, compare apples to apples, please ...
                                     
    Agreed.  For the time being, let's keep both teams out of the #1 spot.
    Apples to apples?
    
    > Yes, Notre Dame, Auburn, and Nebraska have better reputations (whatever
    > that means) than Virginia.  That doesn't mean they are automatically
    > better football teams.
    
    Not better reputations, better schedules.  Big difference.
    
    > Unbeaten and untied is good enough for me.
      
    Can't argue with that.  You're an alum.  There's obviously going to be 
    a personal connection.  I'd feel the same way.  Proud.
    
    Besides, if Virginia proves it on the field against Notre Dame, I'll
    give them national championship credit.  Until then, no.  Was West
    Virginia ranked ahead of the other unbeatens in 1988, even playing a
    schedule that was arguably tougher than Virginia's this year?  No.
    They had to prove it on the field, which they didn't.
    
    glenn
            
27.783The HomeBoys?MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Wed Oct 24 1990 12:106
    
    RE .781
    
    And who do you see in the Orange Bowl?  
    
    Bob V.
27.784Love that Orange bowlNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 24 1990 12:148
    
    >                           -< The HomeBoys? >-
    
    You betcha.  Even if they have three losses by that time, they'd still 
    give Nebraska all they could handle.
    
    glenn
    
27.785RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPerhaps it came from next doorWed Oct 24 1990 12:2023
    Joe C.,
    
    Thanks for my morning laugh.  Love the whining.   USA Today has
    possible matchups for bowls, and they have Auburn vs. Virginia and
    Nebraska vs. Notre Dame.
    
    I don't see what is wrong with playing the best ranked opponent.
    Say in the above scenario, Virginia is still #1 - it makes since
    for the #2 school to play them - because if #2 wins, they will win
    the championship.   I really love the sour grapes crying folks do,
    especially over the Irish playing WEst Virginia.  In 1988, the Irish
    beat the #1 team (Miami - I know, I heard the crying for 2 years
    now), USC which was #3 (I think), and #4 (Michigan?), and then beat
    WVU, which was ranked #2.  I know they played and beat #1, #2, #3,
    and #4 - yet folks still whine and cry.  Unreal.
    
    The first step taken should be to stop certain bowls from being
    tied into conferences - that would do a world of good to starting
    the road to a national championship tourney.  (But even then, they'll
    be whining and crying.)
    
    
    JD
27.786BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Wed Oct 24 1990 12:3720
    
>    USA Today has
>    possible matchups for bowls, and they have Auburn vs. Virginia and
>    Nebraska vs. Notre Dame.
    
    JD, what bowl do they have Auburn and UVA playing in?  I haven't seen
    today's USA Today, but I don't see how Auburn and UVA can meet in a bowl.
    If AU and UVA win the rest of their games, UVA is tied into the Citrus and 
    Auburn tied into the Sugar.  It's that simple, although that would be the
    ideal matchup with 1 vs. 2.  If UVA and Nebraska both go undefeated, ND
    will take UVA over NU hands down.
     
>    In 1988, the Irish
>    beat the #1 team (Miami - I know, I heard the crying for 2 years
>    now), USC which was #3 (I think), and #4 (Michigan?), and then beat
>    WVU, which was ranked #2. 
 
    WVU was ranked 3rd going into the bowls that year if I'm not mistaken.
    
    Joe
27.787Honey, scratch him off the guest list for New YearsSHALOT::HUNTNo. 1 Ranked Virginia CavaliersWed Oct 24 1990 13:0417
    Virginia is *NOT* tied into the Citrus Bowl.  It is the Citrus Bowl
    that is tied into the ACC champion.
    
    The ACC champ is allowed to go to another bowl for a shot at the
    national title *IF* the Citrus Bowl committee can not match the
    payments of that other bowl, in this case, the Sugar if Auburn is
    involved.   But, you'd better believe that the Citrus Bowl folks will
    come up with the money.   This is beyond their wildest dreams.
    
    Also, in case anyone's interested, *IF* Virginia plays Auburn for the
    national title, there will be one helluva scuffle for bragging rights
    in the Hunt family.   I am a 1980 Virginia graduate and my younger
    brother is an Auburn 1983 alum.   Whew, talk about game faces.  We'll
    be lucky if the walls are still standing after this game, if it
    happens.
    
    Bob Hunt
27.788RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPerhaps it came from next doorWed Oct 24 1990 13:1615
    Joe,
    
    They have Auburn vs. Virginia in the Sugar.  
    
    
    Whatever WVU was ranked, the fact is that ND beat the #1, 2, 3,
    and 4 teams that year.  No reason for any yelling from any fans.
    No other team in 88 could match that.  
    
    The USA matchups are hypotheticals, of course.  Seems that Miami
    is definetly headed for the Cotton to squash Texas.   IF Tenn beats
    ND, it could set up an Auburn-Tennessee rematch - but Bowls tend
    to shy away from rematches.
    
    JD
27.789CNTROL::CHILDSDon't be fooled, vote YES on #3Wed Oct 24 1990 13:198
 Thanks Bob and Glenn for filling in the blanks. 70's was a partying decade
 for me hence fuzzy details. Still Glenn to go from 5th to 1st when 3 didn't
 loose has shown a biasing towards ND in my eyes. I think that if they remain
 undefeated, UVA goes to the Citrus and plays a cupcake while ND beats some
 one like Nebraska we will see history made....

 mike
27.790QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Oct 24 1990 13:4116
   Also Joe,

   	You mention Holtz `whining' that he wants to play the highest
   ranked team.

   	A coach would have to be an IDIOT to say `Gee, I want to play the
   toughest team we can find, and who cares what they're ranked.'

   	EVERY Coach with an ounce of sense tries to play the highest
   ranked team (HE HAS NOT ALREADY BEATEN) in order to increase the
   school's chance of winning the Mythical. That's his JOB, for Cripes
   sakes! You make it sound like it's something to be ashamed of. On the
   contrary, any coach who DOESN'T attempt to do that would have good
   reason to be ashamed.

   Mike JN
27.791UVA is #1. Tough bananas to anyone who disagrees.SHALOT::MEDVIDGroove is in the HeartWed Oct 24 1990 13:4615
27.792Cupcakes on 1-Jan ???SHALOT::HUNTNo. 1 Ranked Virginia CavaliersWed Oct 24 1990 13:5018
27.793Sorry, dan'l, debatin' is part of SPORTS' charterNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 24 1990 13:511
    
27.794SHALOT::MEDVIDGroove is in the HeartWed Oct 24 1990 14:0717
>             -< Sorry, dan'l, debatin' is part of SPORTS' charter >-
    
    No it's not.
    
    Yes it is.
    
    No it's not!
    
    Yes it is!
    
    NO IT'S NOT!!!
    
    YES IT IS!!!
    
    Love,
    
    Sybil
27.795RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPerhaps it came from next doorWed Oct 24 1990 14:137
    Bob,
    
    Remember - there are no cupcakes on Jan. 1.  But also remember,
    prevailing logic is that Notre Dame always plays a cupcake on Jan.
    1.  Evidently, UVA is following in their footsteps.  ;-)
    
    JD
27.796QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Oct 24 1990 14:2521
   "This isn't really an argument. An argument is like a debate. There are
   points to be made. You're not arguing... you're just contradicting me."

   "No I'm Not."

   "Yes you are"

   "No I'm not"

   "You ARE!"

   "Not"

   "ARE"

   "Not"

   "ARE!"

   Etc.
   Mike JN and Monty Python
27.797could happenCNTROL::CHILDSDon't be fooled, vote YES on #3Wed Oct 24 1990 14:508
 BYU against a 6-5 Michigan rings a bell Bob. If my beloved Trojans
 keep dropping games like they have been they could end up 7-4 or so
 and be offered a Citrus Bowl invite due to their rep....

 mike

 
27.798AU vs UVACSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleWed Oct 24 1990 15:056
    
    Actually, an Auburn vs. UVA matchup is not out of the question of both
    teams win the remainder of their games.  Remember, ABC broadcasts both
    the Citrus and the Sugar Bowl.  If UVA is #1 and Auburn is #2 which
    bowl do you suppose ABC would want UVA to play in?
    
27.799NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 24 1990 15:0831
                                 
 > BYU against a 6-5 Michigan rings a bell Bob.
    
    That game was played before the Christmas presents were wrapped,
    fergodssake.  Virginia *will* have to play a tough opponent.  Maybe not
    #1 against #2 (my fear), but still a legitimate test.
    
    We are jumping way ahead of ourselves, though.  There's a lot of
    football left.
    
    The Eastern bias stuff is pure nonsense, though.  Eastern football was
    considered second-rate for years and years, and the ACC still generally
    is (a fair statement, ACC fans?).  Wyoming is a WAC team that has yet 
    to play BYU.  Nebraska has always been accorded respect, and with their 
    schedule of late and the slippage of the Big-8 overall, maybe too much 
    respect (based on bowl game performance).  Besides, it's a midwestern 
    conference anyway.
    
    The only team mentioned that I will buy perhaps has not gotten the
    respect they deserve is Washington.  They probably should have been
    national champs in 1984 when BYU won, but even then they've been up and
    down since.  And they haven't exactly been buried in the polls this
    year.  Your USC's and UCLA's, though, I beg to differ.  They pick up
    the prestige vote up there with the best of 'em.
    
    The Pac-10 in general?  All I know is that the Big-8 finished 6-0 
    against them this year, including games pitting top teams, mediocre 
    teams, and also-rans.
    
    glenn
    
27.800Excellent team, but Miami was better in '88HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERVoted for whatsisname...Wed Oct 24 1990 15:4013
    >In 1988, the Irish
    >beat the #1 team (Miami - I know, I heard the crying for 2 years
    >now), USC which was #3 (I think), and #4 (Michigan?), and then beat
    >WVU, which was ranked #2.
    
    USC wasn't #3 that year.  I don't even think they finished top 10 after
    losing the Rose Bowl.  Also, let's not forget that they only beat
    Miami, at South Bend, as a result of one of the all time taint jobs
    a college football fan has ever seen (tho' CU '90 has pushed it
    mightily).  Michigan may have been #4 though, I'm not sure, but that
    leaves this supposedly legacy battin .333.
    
    Dan
27.801RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPerhaps it came from next doorWed Oct 24 1990 15:5611
    Dan,
    
    I go by when ND plays a team - when they played USC (at USC) and
    totally destroyed the myth of Rodney Peete, USC was ranked in the
    top 3.   Miami was #1 when ND beat them.  UWV was #3, Michigan (I
    think it was MIchigan...) was #4 when they played them.   And remember,
    whether you win by 1 or 100, it still goes in the W column.   
    
    And your title sounds like Dave Stewert whining after getting swept...
    
    JD
27.802EARRTH::BROOKSStraight - no chaser ...Wed Oct 24 1990 16:106
    The myth of Rodney Peete ? 
    
    JD, you're anti-Schneider crusade is distorting your brin cells - go
    back to work.
    
    Dr Trojan
27.803RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPerhaps it came from next doorWed Oct 24 1990 16:1911
    Doc,
    
    Peete is doing pretty good now in the pros, but in my opinion, he
    was vastly overrated in college - especially given his disappearing
    act against tough teams (ND, for example).
    
    ANd I'm not on an anti-Schneider crusade.  I think its funny how
    Dan trys to hide his bias under a thin veil of self-proclaimed
    objectivity...
    
    JD
27.804CBOPC3::ROSSYou've fallen and can't get up!Wed Oct 24 1990 16:367
I'm sure Dan would agree that Notre Dame is the Sugar Ray Leonard of college
athletics.   :-)

As another example of the Notre Dame hype job let's all look at Digger Phelps
and wince.   He's done less with more talent than Dean Smith ever has 
{which is saying a lot}.   How many other coaches without titles get to 
do "The Pump" on national tv?
27.805RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPerhaps it came from next doorWed Oct 24 1990 16:439
    Doug,
    
    I'll agree with ya on old Digger.  The guy has a penchant for
    'Excellent losses'.    I'm not much of an ND hoop fan - but I didn
    enjoy when they ended the Wizard's streak.  
    
    HE really is a horrible coach - and he dresses funny too!
    
    JD
27.806You put your head in that one, Dock! :-) SASE::SZABOWed Oct 24 1990 17:025
    
    Dr. Trojan?  Is that anything like brokencondom.com?  :-)
    
    Hawk
    
27.807waaaaaaaaaahaaaaaQUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Oct 24 1990 17:123
   Rooollliiiinnn, Hawster

   Mike JN
27.808BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Oct 26 1990 13:0114
    I see that this note has died. I cant believe the lack of replies the
    week of the CU vs OU game.
    
    Well, I have no idea about this one. I cant predict. I dont even know
    who to root for from the Nebraska standpoint. I guess I should root
    for Oklahoma since they already have a conference loss. Or should I
    say that of the 2 teams they are the only ones with an OFFICIAL
    conference loss.   ;^)
    
    Yes, I've talked myself into it. As much as Oklahoma is a natural enemy
    of Nebraska I must pull for them. If they win then Nebraska is in the
    drives seat.
    
    Husker Henderson  (Ha, and you thought I was gonna say "Nebraska Marty")
27.809I'm not surprised, MartyDENVER::HITEBart Simpson killed Laura PalmerFri Oct 26 1990 16:186
    Howday, Marty!  
    
    Why am I not surprised that you will be rootin' for the Sooners
    tomorrow?  Go Buffs! ( I bet you're not surprised at that either!)
    
    Jan, Loyal CU Fan
27.810First three-game losing streak since 1965 coming up for OkiesNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 26 1990 18:0115
    
    Sorry, Marty, I'm afraid the Sooners have come back to earth after
    early speculation that they might be better than anyone thought before
    the season.  Last year they should have lost to Iowa State except the
    Cyclones' coach fell in love with the two-point conversion and gave
    four points away.  This year the Sooners made sure they repaid the
    favor.  They're just not that good.  Something that Oklahoma has missed
    over most of the 80's is that single dominating offensive performer.
    That man might have been Mike Gaddis, but it was not to be...
    
    Look for Colorado to pound away at the Sooners' slumping defense and
    win by three touchdowns.
    
    glenn (who has *never* been in a situation to root for rival Nebraska)
                                                         
27.811Might Huskers SHALL prevail - just admit it...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Oct 26 1990 18:5228
    Gee I dont know Glenn. The Texas loss was a game that OU dominated
    in every area but the final score. The ISU loss was an upset. Dont
    know what happened there.
    
    For your sake I hope your not taking OU to lightly. I think it will
    be closer than 3 TD's. Either way my team has their destiny in their
    own hands as of now. Just win against OU and CU. However, If NU does
    slip against one of those worthy oppenents then it would help the
    Huskers IF both OU and CU had 1 conference loss each also. Thats why
    I must root for OU in this game. If I had my druthers I'd root for CU
    to beat OU just because from the historic sense I have 2 favorite teams-
    Nebraska and whoever plays Oklahoma.
    
    If NU, OU, & CU all had one conference loss then I would have to figure
    that the Orange bowl committe would invite Nebraska over CU as CU would
    then have 2 losses and a tie. However who beats who is also a factor. If
    NU looses to CU and beats Oklahoma and OU beats CU, then the Orange bowl
    committe would have a problem. OU cant go, NU would have the best record
    but weakest schedule and a loss to CU but CU would have 2 losses and a
    tie. Do you think that in this situation the Orange Bowl committe would
    take the CU/Mizzou game into consideration ???????????????????????
    
    I suppose it could come down to whoever was rated the highest???
    
    Well, hang onto your seats Big-8 fans because we are about to separate
    the men from the boys as NU, OU, & CU start playing each other.
    
    Nebraska Marty    GO BIG RED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
27.812I Cant Wait !!!!!!BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Sun Oct 28 1990 18:4029
    Everything is now set up.    R E V E N G E  week has arrived !!!
    
    CU over OU by 9 in a tuff game of big-plays.   NU over ISU by 32.
    
    At stake:
    
    	For Colorado - Big-8 championship and a possible top-5 finish.
    
    	For Nebraska - Big-8 championship and a possible national championship.
    
    As I see it - Nebraska will be the toughest defense CU has faced this
    year. CU will be the best defense NU has faced all year. I dont expect
    this one to be a high scoring affair. Maybee both teams in the twenties
    or upper teens. I'll say Nebraska by 7 or more. CU will be up but this
    year CU will be the ones in a hostile enviornment. Never mind that
    coach Osborne is an even termpered non-emotional guy. His team and his
    fans will be sky high for the revenge game. And Nebraska has a very
    good combination of speed and strength. More speed this year than any
    past year.
    
    All I can say is - Bring on Colorado !!! I'm hungry for some buffalo
    meat !!!!!!    I CANT WAIT !!! This should be a great game.
    
    Congrats to CU for beating OU 2 straight. This is a landmark for the
    Buff program.
    
    Better enjoy it. 2 in a row AINT gonna happen against Nebraska !!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.813Colorado looks like the cream of the crop in Big-8NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 29 1990 11:2030
           
    From what I've seen against the tough schedule they've played, I think
    that Colorado is the best team in the Big-8.  At the very least they've
    proved that last year was no fluke.  I don't think Nebraska can match
    offenses with Colorado.  They will have to win on defense come
    Saturday, and since that defense has yet to be tested, I don't believe
    they can do it.
    
    For those that caught the CU-OU game on Saturday, is Bill McCartney
    badly in need of an enema or what?  I mean, even in victory, the guy
    looks like he's in some serious *pain*.  At the end of the first half,
    he stated that OU was only ahead on "trick" plays.  What, a pump fake
    to freeze the defense and a twenty-five yard out from a passing 
    quarterback is a trick?  C'mon, coach.  Relax and enjoy it.  Beating 
    Oklahoma is a big win.
    
    Too bad Cale Gundy went down early.  Steve Collins did a good job 
    running the option, but it's awful difficult when you're behind.  For
    the second guessers, I actually thought Gibbs made the right decision
    going for it on fourth-and-one at the ten even when a field goal would
    have put OU up.  OU's defense had spent too much time on the field, and
    I felt they needed to come away with a touchdown.  A gutsy call, but at
    least Gibbs was playing to win, unlike the Texas game.  Sure, Colorado
    came right back with the 85-yard TD pass to put it away, but that was 
    not due to a defensive breakdown or demoralization.  Considering 
    Colorado's superiority defensively and on the offensive line, I felt OU 
    played reasonably well.
    
    glenn
    
27.814Only Game in Town!MILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 29 1990 11:5512
    
    Both Colorado and Nebraska have good teams.  Saturday we'll find out
    who has the better team.  Facing common opponents Nebraska out-scored
    them 114-34, Colorado 61-43.  
    
    Colorado had a good team last year.  I don't think anyone is seriously
    questioning that!  However, we would have found out a lot more about 
    Colorado last year if they had at least one of their punt returns called 
    back because of the clips.
    
    Bob V.
    
27.815Bieniemy for the HeismanPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Oct 29 1990 12:2121
  Great game for CU on Saturday. After a rocky start, they seem to be peaking.
  Early in the year, they had a number of turnovers but the last 3 weeks,
  I don't think they have turned the ball over at all. This is a team of big
  plays. Public Bieniemy #1 looks like a legitimate Heisman trophy candidate. 
  He's averaging around 150 yards a game against quality opponents unlike some
  of the other candidates who roll up the stats against girls teams. With Hagan,
  Bieniemy, Pritchard and McCluen on punt returns this team can strike fast
  at any time. CU has to have one of the most dangerous offenses in college
  football. It will be interesting to see what happens against the much
  publicized but untested Nebraska defense. However, I do think CU has faced
  a defense equal to or better than Nebraska when they played Illinois.
  CU's problem has been their defense. While they do have some outstanding
  player's, they have some weak spots and have given up too much to the pass.
  Does Nebraska have a passing attack ? Will Nebraska pass a lot against CU or
  try to run them into the ground ?

  Since they are playing at home, I look for Nebraska to be favored by 
  3-6 points. But anything can happen on Saturday and I look for a very 
  exciting game (much like last year).

					Keith
27.816Huskers in Miami on Jan 1 !!!BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 29 1990 16:4331
    The CU vs OU game is an idication to me that BOTH teams have weak
    pass defense. I believe this to be more of an accurate indication
    than drawing a conclusion that either team can pass half way decent.
    
    Listening to a Nebraska assistant coach talk on the Nebraska Football
    radio network after the ISU game Saturday, he indicated that the
    Huskers would be throwing more againse CU. However this is in reference
    to the fact that NU only thru 4 passes last Saturday. All 4 were
    completed and 2 were for TD's.
    
    In all but one game this year Nebraska has been very sluggish
    offensively in the first half, then come out like gangbusters in the
    second half. I think it's a matter of motivation. How do you get "up"
    to play NU's schedule this year? The only game they really needed to
    get up for was Mizzou considering what they did to CU the week before
    NU played them. In this game the Huskers destroyed Mizzou from the
    get-go.
    
    In short - will Nebraska be sluggish offensively in the first half
    against Cu ??? ...
    
    ...I have no idea !!!
    
    Ha, I caught ya. You though I was gonna say they will be up and come
    out like a lion dident ya !!!     ;^)
    
    As I did in note 388.? I am going on-line right now to predict a
    Nebraska victory over CU Buffalo Meat. I'm not gonna predict points,
    just another Husker victory.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.817MPO::GILBERTNo on 3 Yes on 5 Keep Mass. AliveMon Oct 29 1990 16:544
    
    Neither Nebraska nor Colorado will be national champs unless 2 or
    3 other teams go right in the toilet before the end of the season.
    Reason: strength of schedule.  
27.818PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Oct 29 1990 17:0618
>    Neither Nebraska nor Colorado will be national champs unless 2 or
>    3 other teams go right in the toilet before the end of the season.
>    Reason: strength of schedule.  

  You may be right about NU's schedule but CU's schedule is nothing to 
  laugh about. Teams on their schedule include:
  	Washington 	- currently ranked 6th or 7th
  	Nebraska 	- currently ranked #2
  	Oklahoma	- ranked as high as #7
  	Texas		- ranked #13
  	Tennesse	- ranked as high as #4
  	Illinois	- currently ranked #5
  	Stanford	- Beat Notre Dame
  	
  The announcer on last week's game said that USA today had CU's schedule
  ranked as the 2nd toughest in the nation.

  					Keith
27.819Go BuFFs!CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UMon Oct 29 1990 17:3233
    
    re. .817
    
    Colorado will not be national champs because the Missouri game
    has tainted their image and because they have a loss and a tie,
    not because of strength of schedule.  CU has played 5 teams in
    the top 20 --(Tennessee, Illinois, Texas, Washington, Oklahoma and
    a Stanford team that beat Notre Dame)--of which 3 were in the top
    ten.  They tied Tennessee and lost to Illinois by a point at Illinois.
    
    I believe Colorado has gone from being overrated at the start of
    the season to being underrated currently.  And the game against
    Nebraska should be a good one...  I think it will be a very close
    game between teams of similar abilities, with CU having more individual
    "star" players, but maybe NU playing better as a team unit.
    
    I think if CU played NU's schedule, CU would be 8-0 as well, if NU 
    played CU's schedule, I don't think NU would be undefeated/untied.
    
    Any idea of what the point spread might be for the CU/NU game?
    
    I'd like to CU win this game and go to the Orange Bowl for a 
    rematch against Notre Dame (maybe not for the national championship
    but to prove that their a quality program to stay...)
    
    Does anyone know who's televising the CU/NU game.  Out here in
    Massachusetts, I just know that CBS is showing Virginia vs
    Georgia Tech. 
    
    
    Thanks,
    
    Peace/ed
27.820Hope they dont use last years NU/CU reffs also...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 29 1990 17:327
    I heard that the 7 refs who did the Mizzou game have been reinstated.
    I have no official source on this.
    
    If this is true I'm sure the Big-8 will NOT allow them to do the
    Bugeaters vs Clippers/5th downers game.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.821ESPNMILPND::VLASAKFlatliners for Mass...YES on #3Mon Oct 29 1990 17:587
    ESPN will be carrying the Nebraska - Colorado game.
    
    Even if CU wins and gets invited to the Orange Bowl, they will not get
    a rematch with ND, who will be in the Hostess Cupcake Citrus Bowl.
    
    Bob V.
    
27.822CU/ND Orange BowlCURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UMon Oct 29 1990 18:0912
    
    re. .821
    
    What if Georgia Tech beats Virginia or Notre Dame loses
    to Tennessee, USC or Penn State...
    
    Possibility of CU/ND in Orange rematch or is this too
    far-fetched?  I'm not quite sure...
    
    but I'd like to see it...
    
    Peace/ed
27.823BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Oct 29 1990 18:103
    Dont wory about it. CU wont be in the Orange bowl.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.824RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMy lasted week as a bachelorMon Oct 29 1990 18:1210
    re .822
    
    You have to realize that the author of .821 has severe case of
    anti-ND-itis.  Probably a Buff fan still smarting from last year's
    whipping.   HE whines every week about ND, this week about the refs
    jobbing Pitt.  ND will play the highest ranked opponent they can.
    And it may all be moot, since the Big Eight champ is tied to a bowl
    and ND may lose one or more of their last three games.  
    
    JD
27.825Have they fallen in the polls?SHALOT::MEDVIDDump Jesse HelmsMon Oct 29 1990 18:1510
    I think Colorado would have to do a lot of PR work just to play for the
    national title.  As far as most of the pollsters see it, Colorado has
    one loss because of the five down fiasco.  
    
    As I was watching the CU OU game this weekend, the announcer said that
    they had fallen in the polls just about every week even though they had
    won.  The team and the university feel it is because of the five down
    game.  I can see no other explanation.
    
    	--dan'l
27.826Colorado - Nebraska on ESPNFSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Mon Oct 29 1990 18:361
    
27.827PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Oct 29 1990 18:455
  I think CBS really blew it when they decided to air the Virginia/Georgia
  Tech game over the NU/CU game. I think NU and CU are both better teams
  and it's turning into a great rivalry. 

  					Keith
27.828game times?JURAN::MCKAYMon Oct 29 1990 20:237
    Nebraska is on ESPN at 4 eastern.  I have the Virginia game going
    at 12:10 eastern has this changed due to T.V.  I was planning
    on rooting G. Tech on to victory and then watching Nebraska run
    all over the buf's.  This would be much better than clicking between
    games.
    
    Jimbo
27.829OSU put up some pointsFREMNT::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Oct 29 1990 20:236
    Oklahoma State's offense finally woke up this year and put some
    points on the board.  48-28 over CU's buddies--Missouri.  Somehow
    they put it all together.  Gerald Hudson ran for 255 yards, too.
    CU could overlook them in a couple weeks.
    
    Cowboy
27.830BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Mon Oct 29 1990 20:3920
    The Buffs had a very good second half after their usual slow start.
    IMO the big difference in the CU-OU game was when Gundy left the game. 
    After that, OU's slowed down significantly, which is why I also believe
    NU will be trying to pass quite a bit against CU.  Bienemy is one of
    the Heisman frontrunners right now and has a big chance to improve his
    position on national TV against NU, although Shawn Moore probably has
    the inside track.  If Bienemy played for ND, the publicity contest
    known as the Heisman race would be over right now.  Anyone notice the
    graphic during the OU-CU game noting that Mike Pritchard has more
    all-purpose yards than Rocket boy?  Another reason why Ismail shouldn't
    even be mentioned in the Heisman race.
    
    As far as CBS' decision to televise UVA-Tech over NU-CU: it kind of makes
    sense, although I think CU-NU will be the better of the 2.  First of
    all, this UVA's only chance to get beat before the bowls, and secondly
    CBS just carried CU this past week.  And ABC only carries Pac-10 and
    Big-10 games.
    
    Joe
    
27.831GENRAL::WADEShhhhh, be vewy quiet......Tue Oct 30 1990 11:5811
    
    Joe,
    
    	As much as I like CU, there is no way that Mike Pritchard
    	is better than the Rocket.  Teams that ND play devise
    	defenses specifically to stop him.  They also try to kick
    	away from him on kickoffs and punts.  If you don't believe
    	Rocket is better, just wait til the draft and see who gets
    	selected earlier  ;^)
    
    Claybroon
27.832BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Tue Oct 30 1990 12:328
    RE -1
    I didn't say that Pritchard was better than Rocket.  My point is that
    Rocket's stats aren't worthy of Heisman material and the main reason
    he's in the Heisman race is because he plays for the media darlings.
    If Holtz had played Ismail more this season, he would probably be a
    legitimate Heisman candidate.
    
    Joe
27.833RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMy lasted week as a bachelorTue Oct 30 1990 12:478
    IN today's Heismann Poll, Moore of Virginia is 1st with Detmer second.
    The rocket, Klinger, and Biemeny are 3-5, put way back.
    
    I"m knida rooting for Virginia to win the national title, or Nebraska,
    but I'd like ND to win just because it would piss a lot of people
    off, and the whining would be a howl to read....
    
    JD
27.834The Rocket: ND; Klingler, Detmer: inflated statsNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 30 1990 12:597
    
    If Bienemy's way back at fifth, something is amiss...
    
    I'd put him no worse than second, behind Moore.
    
    glenn
    
27.835Is it 2:00 p.m. I thinkCRONIC::CLAYBROOKTue Oct 30 1990 16:486
    I thought the Viginia-Tech game was at 2:00, thats what I thought I saw
    last weekend watching the game. Thats the time CBS normally starts its
    games. But I might be wrong. It would be nice if it started at about
    12:00.
    
                                                          Dan
27.836BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Oct 30 1990 17:205
    "The line" has Nebraska a 6.5 point favorite. I dont put much stock
    in "the line." It's set up to try to get people to bet, not according
    to who the "experts" think is going to win.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.837Thrash CURAVEN1::RJONESWed Oct 31 1990 05:348
    Nebraska Marty, The Buffalo meat that we enjoyed in Anaheim was real
    good, but we couldn't get that last bite down. The only trouble y'all
    may have will be trying to decide just how bad you want to beat those
    jerks. This is one Volunteer who will be pbetting on you.
    
    SEC and Tennessee #1
    
    Rich
27.838NU 31 CU 17RAVEN1::M_PHILLIPSFlirting With DisasterWed Oct 31 1990 06:184
    I look for NU to beat CU in a close game not so much in scoring, but it
    in Stats.
    
                                                         M.J.
27.839The Sea of Red will be ALIVE...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Oct 31 1990 13:3821
    I'm getting psyched up !!!
    
    Thursday after work I'm jetting outta here (CX03) and headin down hill
    to Omaha !!! Come Saturday gametime myself and some friends will be
    at Memorial stadium in Lincoln wearing RED and screaming our lungs out
    and having a blast.
    
    Geez I hope Nebraska wins. I truely believe they should this year but
    anything can happen an a given Saturday.
    
    Man that place is gonna be "UP" for this one. Cant wait. I'll say it'll
    be a close game at half with the Huskers winning by more than a TD and
    not more than 10. !!
    
    I think I'll do some practicing...
    
    GO BIG RED    GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED
    GO BIG RED    GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED
    GO BIG RED    GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED   GO BIG RED ...
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.840CSC32::GL_JOHNSONI CAN'T drive 55!Thu Nov 01 1990 18:4713
    
    	I think this game will be very similiar to last year's CU-NU clash,
    big plays from both offenses, great individual plays, and a nail-biting, 
    last-ditch drive in the waning minutes of the game.  IMHO, CU will have
    to get some other players involved offensively(re: Pritchard & Hemingway)
    to keep NU off balance defensively.  I think Public Bienemy #1 will have a 
    BIG game and, in the process, gain more consideration for the Heisman.
    
        One of the best college football games of the year will unfold
    in Lincoln on Sat.  Two teams vying for respect and for the Big-8 
    crown.  I look for CU to win, something along the lines of 28-23.
    
    						 glen j.
27.841Buffs Will Win!DENVER::HITEBart Simpson killed Laura PalmerThu Nov 01 1990 21:456
    I am wearing my black and gold to the office tomorrow!  I predict the
    Buffs will be victorious in a tough tough game with the Nubrasca
    Huskers.  CU's preseason schedule will be an assset on Saturday while
    Big Red's much easier schedule will hurt them.
    
    Jan, Go Buffs!f
27.842Buffs will be neutered!WORDS::NISKALAIntercourse the penguin!Fri Nov 02 1990 09:298
27.843The Cheaters by threeCNTROL::CHILDSNever, hear surf music again...Fri Nov 02 1990 09:485
 re-1 (aka J.T.E) sure it isn't the donks (in particular BBJ) bad performance
 that has kept you out of here?

 mike
27.844BSS::JCOTANCHStanford 36, Notre Dame 31!!!Fri Nov 02 1990 12:5828
    This game figures to be another great one.  There's no reason to
    believe that one team will come in more psyched up than the other.  NU
    has the incentive of avenging last year's bitter loss and wanting to
    win that first national title for Osborne.  CU wants to show they
    belong among the nation's elite and McCartney's teams have always
    played NU tough.  I think the first difference in the game will be
    turnovers.  If turnovers are fairly even or not a factor, I expect the
    difference to be CU's offense against NU's defense.  CU's offense
    hasn't really gotten rolling all year, although they have exploded at
    times.  NU has alot of quickness on defense and this may be their best
    defense under Osborne, but they're virtually untested against weak
    competition.  CU's defense has had some bad moments, but has been
    pretty consistent over the season and should be able to keep NU's
    offense under control.  
    
    So if CU hurts itself with turnovers, they will lose IMO.  Otherwise, I
    expect CU to move the ball fairly well on NU's defense and win.
    
    CU 24
    NU 10 
    
    One note: CU inside linebacker Chad Brown won't make the trip to
    Lincoln because he has mononucleosis.  Terry Johnson will start in his
    place.
    
    Joe (who won't be terribly distraught if NU wins because NU could
        end up winning the national title instead of ND)
                                                               
27.845CU in the orange bowlPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonFri Nov 02 1990 16:1427
  I agree with Joe about the turnover's. Talent wise, this game is very 
  close so whoever gives up the ball will probably lose. CU had some
  problems with turnover's early in the year but haven't given the ball
  away for at least 3 games. Against Oklahoma, they seemed to be peaking
  both offensively and defensively. With Bieniemy, Pritchard and Garten,
  CU will have the three best offensive player's on the field. With Alfred 
  Thompson, they have the best defensive player. But NU is solid at every 
  position and has better depth. Special teams won the game last year for
  CU. I still give CU the special teams edge with McCloughan's runback 
  ability. However, CU's All American punter has been in a slump lately.

  Hagan has had problems passing this year. If Hagan doesn't throw well 
  and CU gets behind, do you think McCartney will play Johnson who is a 
  better passer and has proven come from behind abilities ?

  I've always been a believer that in any sport, competition breeds a
  champion. CU has the advantage here but NU has been getting up for this
  game all year where CU has had to get up for 5 or 6 big games.

  CU will miss starter Chad Brown and play untested Terry Johnson.

  I expect a few trick plays from either or both teams. I look for a very 
  exciting game that could go either way. 

  24-21 as CU wins with a touchdown on a long drive late in the 4th quarter. 

					Keith
27.846GO BUFFS!!GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreSat Nov 03 1990 21:188
    
    Nebraska loses to Colorado. There were no disputed penalties or
    nothing. Colorado just pushed the ball down their throats. EB had a big
    game, overcoming a couple of fumbles that almost crippled Colorado. All
    in All, a great game to watch.
    
    Dennis
    
27.847Way to go Jan...RAVEN1::RJONESSun Nov 04 1990 11:186
    I was wrong... Congratulations to all you CU fans. Great win. 
    We will try to help you all move higher after we kick NDs a$$ this
    Saturday in Knoxville.
    
    Go Vols
    Rich
27.848FMCSSE::BROWNWhiskey River's don't run DrySun Nov 04 1990 15:2515
    
    Yo Marty
    
    I bet it really got cold round Lincoln in the forth quarter. It now
    appears to me that Dr. Tom's soft schedule was the Husker's forth quarter
    downfall. Not having played any competition made it hard on the
    regulars trying to stay up with the Buffs. It looked as though they
    came unglued late in the game, especially after the fake (why in hell
    did he try a fake with all that time left) punt. 
    
    Better luck next year
    
    Cadzilla 
    
    
27.849Buffs looked good. Beat ND, never liked the Irish...WORDS::NISKALAIntercourse the penguin!Mon Nov 05 1990 09:4211
    	Congrats to the Buffs. They stuffed it down the Huskers throats,
    plain and simple. It could have been different had they ruled a TD for
    Mickey Joseph, rather than putting him out at the nine, leading to a
    missed FG. But then it could have been a LOT WORSE if Bienemy hadn't
    had a bad case of early fumblitis. CU could have won by more. They were
    just clearly the better of the two teams.
    	As to the fake punt that failed, it was a little to early to try
    it, there still was ~7 minutes left, but if it had worked it might have
    been looked upon as a genius manuever......
    	As it goes every year it seems........  wait 'til nexted year!
    
27.850NU vs top ten teamsCRONIC::CLAYBROOKMon Nov 05 1990 09:588
    Great win for CU, that was Nebraskas fourth consecutive loss to a top
    ten team. I think it was a little early for the fake, but I'm not the
    coach, because they were gonna have to kick it into the wind sohe
    probably figured that CU would get good field position. Well if Texas
    doesn't beat Houston next week you will have two different #1 ranked 
    teams after the bowl games. 
    
                                                            Dan
27.851GO BIG REDBSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 05 1990 11:43110
    Well lets see. The menu here at the Crow Cafe has:
    
    	Crow Salad
    	Crow Stew
    	Crow Pizza
    	Crow pie
    	...
    
    Yech.
    
    Congrats to CU. They pulled it off. What a great feat for them to beat
    the Big-2 back to back 2 years straight. This hurt Nebraska
    particularly bad because the explosion came AFTER the PA anouncer
    informed the crowd durring the 3rd quarter that Virginia had gotten
    beat. When that happened the already loud Husker crowd went crazy. We
    had the taste of #1 in our mouths and the Huskers were dominating at
    this point in the game.  In fact, thru 3 quarters CU had 37 net yards.
    
    Everyone in the staduim was very confident that NU would win as the 3rd
    quarter came to a close. Then it came crashing in.
    
    Being there and hearing post game interviews and reading newspaper
    articles I have a good view on what happened.
    
    First off, both teams had trouble passing. Mickey Joseph told Osborne
    at halt time that he could not grip the ball. I'm sure it was the
    same for Hagen also. So in a way, this game was not a real indication
    of BOTH teams abilites.
    
    But what happened is that in the 4th quarter McArtney "got a clue"
    as they say on how to attack Nebraska. In recent years NU has been
    recruiting for speed over size to try to keep up with the Miami's of
    the world. What it boiled down to is this:
    
    	CU's offensive line AVERAGES 287.
    	NU's defensive front line averages something like 240.
    	The biggest NU starting defensive lineman is Walker at 250.
    
    CU was stuffed for 3 quarters because they were playing option
    football. Nebraska's supperior speed stuffed it. Like I said - 37
    total yards in 3 quarters. Then McArtney started running up the middle
    right at Nebraska off tackle. Charlie McBride, the NU defensive
    coordinater, said that the Husker interior line just could not handle
    that physically due to size differential. CU started breaking good
    gains on runs up the middle which caused the NU linebackers and safety
    to try to support. Now this opened up the pass. And the ball was dryer
    by the forth quarter because it hadent rained since the first quarter.
    
    Also the CU defense rose to the occasion in the forth quarter. Nu's
    offense is questionalble this year. BUT they are very young.
    
    In post game intervies BOTH Osborne and McArtney agreed in separate
    interviews that the key was running straight up the middle in the
    forth quarter.
    
    ALL NU players, and coaches said that it was not a case of getting
    tired. It was just that CU decided that the only was they can beat
    NU is to run it straigt at them because NU has too much speed to
    get outside. That was the key, plain and simple. NU did no run out
    of gas in the 4th and CU did not wear them down. It was simple good
    coaching by the CU staff. Exploit the oppositions weakness with your
    streangh.
    
    What a reversal. I remember when NU used to jam it straight down the
    other teams you know what because NU had supperior size.
    
    The NU crowd is not a bad looser. They did not boo CU at the end of the
    game or throw things etc...
    
    I quote McArtney from the Omaha World Herald - "The Nebraska crowd
    really showed a lot of class. I hope our players handle this with the
    himility that they should. Because the Nebraska crowd was trememdous -
    behind their team the whole game. And when the game ended they were
    very generous. I'm greatful for that, and I think that's a class that
    we at Colorado would want to duplicate."
    
    I justify the fake punt because NU was having trouble stopping CU at
    that point and NU was having big trouble moving the ball. Osborne said
    they tried everything they knew in the 4th quarter to stop the runs up
    the middle but nothing worked. He had to try the fake punt at that
    point.
    
    It is disturbing that NU has lost to every tough team they have faced
    the last 2 years. But the schedule does get better next year and in
    years to come. In fact, next year it's the opposite, Cu has weak
    schedule and Nu had a tougher one.
    
    I know from talking with people in Nebraska that NU has some good QB's
    coming up. Passing QB's. We'll see what happens in comming years.
    NU will not fall in to the ranks of the unranked. That's for sure.
    
    I love my Huskers and feel that they still deserve respect. Do you
    think beating NU was easy for CU. NO. Not by a long
    
    Let me just say that I enjoyed going to the game even though the
    weather was bad and the good guys lost. Thru 3 quarters I had a blast.
    You CU fans just really dont understand what Husker football means to 
    the state. The culture at the stadium is very special. There is such a
    feeling of comradary a oneness. The sea of red kind of graphicaly displays
    it.
    
    The Nebraska crowd was great. From before the game they were very loud
    and supported NU VERY well. The chants of GO BIG RED exchoed thru the
    stadium with enthusiasm and power. And for 3 quarters Nebraska showed
    what they are capable of and gave the crowd much to cheer about. In
    short it was just fun to go back home and be a part of it.
    
    NEXT YEAR !!!!!!!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.852Just change the location and the team color...SHALOT::MEDVIDDump Jesse HelmsMon Nov 05 1990 12:0014
>    You CU fans just really dont understand what Husker football means to 
>    the state. The culture at the stadium is very special. There is such a
>    feeling of comradary a oneness. The sea of red kind of graphicaly displays
>    it.
    
    Give me a break, Marty.  I can see anyone being proud of their team,
    but NU football is no more special than Penn State, Miami, Colorado, 
    Ball State, Nyack College, Bucknell, Upper Northern South Dakota Sate, 
    etc...
    
    Sorry you guys got beat, man, but don't stoop to the holier-than-though
    Notre Daming.
    
    	--dan'l
27.853GENRAL::WADEShhhhh, be vewy quiet......Mon Nov 05 1990 12:0723
    
    Well Marty, it appears you need to enroll in the "Hoot Gibson
    School of Making Predictions".  His motto was, "Make no predictions,
    eat no crow!".  :^)
    
    You're right on target with your analysis of running up the
    middle versus the outside game.  NU had superior defensive
    speed which negated CU's outside game.  I was screaming at
    the TV trying to tell Mac to run it up the middle :^)
    
    There was an interesting comment made by the ESPN announcer
    on the sideline that I think may shed some light on CU's
    *attitude*.  After Bienemy lost his last fumble, everyone
    on the sideline got urinated.  Players and coaches really
    got fired up.  Many of them gathered around EB telling him
    to forget about it and to suck it up.  In contrast, after
    CU scored to go ahead 13-12, the NU players on the sideline
    hung their heads and turned away from the field.  
    
    Terry Johnson, the fill-in for Chad Brown, played a whale of
    a game.
    
    Claybroon
27.854Justice prevails in the Big-8NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 05 1990 12:3531
    
    Like I said beforehand, Colorado has played a real schedule this year 
    and had proven themselves to be the best team in the Big-8.  They went
    out and proved that again on Saturday.  Even with the Missouri fiasco, 
    *they* deserve the respect, not those cream-puff ingesters from up in 
    Lincoln.
    
    Marty, from the schedules you posted earlier, Nebraska does not play
    anything resembling a "tough" schedule over the next five years. 
    Expect more of the same treatment in years to come.
    
    For those that favor the coaches' UPI poll, anyone see NU athletic
    director and legend-in-residence Bob Devaney embarrass himself on CBS' 
    pre-game show Saturday?  Seems that 'ol Bob has been criticizing Big-8 
    coaches for voting against Nebraska in the polls, claiming that it takes 
    money from the pockets of Big-8 schools.  Mike Fransesca even asked 
    point-blank "But what about integrity, Bob?", which Devaney hemmed 
    and hawed his way around before stating that if his Huskers were to
    beat Colorado, *then* they deserved the #1 ranking.  I guess the Husker
    critics will be getting off the very outspoken critic Fransesca's (at 
    least there's some honesty in the sports media) back now...
    
    And Dan'l, leave poor Nebraska Marty alone. ;-)  For those of us who 
    have participated in the Big-8 note for years, this is the most humility
    I've ever seen him show.  Last year all we got was the incessant Sal and 
    the refs thing over and over again, and how things would be different
    this year on Husker turf.  This year there can be no excuses.  Colorado 
    is the Big-8 champion.
    
    glenn
       
27.855MARTY HENDERSON IS GOING TO EAT CROW...CSC32::MASIASMon Nov 05 1990 12:5124
    
    	I never enter anything into this conference in fact I just
    	added today because I heard Marty Henderson was making excuses
    	for Nebraska loosing.

    	I work with Marty and for the last couple weeks thats all I 
    	heard was how Nebraska was going to rip Colorado to pieces.
    	In fact I have had to listen him talk about last years loss
    	to Colorado and how Nebraska was going to take revenge.

    	Well after the smoke cleared on Saturday Colorado prevailed,
    	I admit that Beinemey was Nebraskas best player for 3 quarters
    	but he and the team pulled together and proved on national
    	television what kind of character they have.

    	I am not going to argue about stats and good/bad calls in
    	the game that fact is Nebraska lost to a better team.

    	Marty is in a two week training course but I will wait till he gets
    	back to rub it in.

    	He has talked so much about this game that its going to be hard
    	for him to come back to work, I GUARANTEE THIS !!!!!!!!!!!!!
    	
27.856Get real MasiasBSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 05 1990 12:5812
    re: .855
    
    Where the hell did you hear that I was "making excuses" ????
    
    That's pure BS. Read my note !!! There are no excuses there. Only
    an explanation of how CU exploited Nu's weakness.
    
    Be accurate Mark.
    
    Still proud as Hell,
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.857BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 05 1990 13:0711
    re: .852
    
    Just plain NOT true. Nebraska has NOTHING else. Colorado has the
    Bronco's and other pro sports. Pennsylvania has other pro sports
    and on and on. I have lived in both Colorado and Nebraska and I
    know what I am talking about. Just ask Osborne about the pressure.
    
    There is something VERT special in the state of Nebraska that you
    dont know about or understand.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.858BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 05 1990 13:1182
    Washington, UCLA, Arizona State are not slouches. It's still not the
    best schedule but it does get better...
    
           <<< OURGNG::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS.NOTE;2 >>>
                 -< OURGNG::SPORTS - Digital's daily tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 27.369                 ****  BIG-8  SPORTS  ****                 369 of 857
BSS::M_HENDERSON "Bart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!"   81 lines  27-JUL-1990 11:14
                  -< Nebraska Football Schedules 1990 - 1996 >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             1991

		Sep. 7	Utah State - HOME
		     14 Colorado State
		     21 Washington - HOME
		     28 Arizona State
		Oct. 12 Oklahoma State
		     19 Kansas State - HOME
		     26 Missouri
		Nov.  2 Colorado
		      9 Kansas - HOME
		     16 Iowa State
		     23 Oklahoma - HOME
				
                         1992
	
		Sep.  5 Utah - HOME
		     12 Temple - HOME
		     19 Washington
		     26 Arizona State - HOME
		Oct. 10 Oklahoma State - HOME
		     17 Kansas State
		     24 Missouri - HOME
		     31 Colorado - HOME
		Nov.  7 Kansas
		     14 Iowa State - HOME
		     21 Oklahoma		
		
                         1993
	
		Sep.  4 Wyoming - HOME
		     11 Texas Tech - HOME
		     18 UCLA
		     25 Colorado State - HOME
		Oct.  9 Oklahoma State
		     16 Kansas State - HOME
		     23 Missouri
		     30 Colorado
		Nov.  6 Kansas - HOME
		     13 Iowa State
		     20 Oklahoma - HOME	

                         1994
	
		Sep.  3 Wyoming - HOME
		     10 Texas Tech
		     17 UCLA - HOME
		     24 Utah State - HOME
		Oct.  8 Oklahoma State - HOME
		     15 Kansas State
		     22 Missouri - HOME
		     29 Colorado - HOME
		Nov.  5 Kansas
		     12 Iowa State - HOME
		     19 Oklahoma
		
                         1995*
	
		Sep.  9 Michigan State
		     16 Arizona State - HOME
		     23 Utah State - HOME
		     30 Washington State - HOME
		
		
                         1996*

		Sep.  7 Nevada-Las Vegas - HOME
		     14 Michigan State - HOME
		     21 Arizona State
		     28 Colorado State - HOME

* 1995 and 1996 Big Eight Schedules still to be determined
27.859Excuses, excuses, excuses...CSC32::MASIASMon Nov 05 1990 13:1310
    	I knew I would hit a VEIN...   everyone in this team listened to
    	you about how NEBRASKA was such a superior team and how Nebraska
    	was going to QUOTE "SPANK COLORADO". We all know this was not to
    	be true.

    	By the way where did you get those stats you posted earlier they
    	seem to conflict the stats in the newspaper.

    	I am enjoying this moment...
27.860SHALOT::MEDVIDDump Jesse HelmsMon Nov 05 1990 13:145
>    There is something VERT special in the state of Nebraska that you
>    dont know about or understand.
    
    Corn?
    
27.861CU vs ND rematch ???PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Nov 05 1990 13:3532
  For CU fans, this game was real hard to watch for 3 quarter's. But the
  4th quarter was a different story. There's no question in my mind that
  CU's tough schedule made them a better prepared team once the pressure was 
  on.

  One thing I don't understand is why ESPN made Erci Bieniemy the MVP.
  Sure he scored 4 TD's and made a terrific comeback in the 4th quarter 
  but he did fumble 4 or 5 times. The MVP should have gone to Mike
  Prichard who made some great receptions to put them in scoring position
  and had a 40 yard run which was called back. The more I watch Pritchard,
  the more I like his play. As other's have pointed out, he is used by CU
  the same way ND uses Rocket Ismail. But his stats are better and CU's 
  schedule is comparable or tougher than ND's. He's not getting the 
  recognition he deserves but don't be surprised if he ends up a 1st round 
  NFL draft choice. I was also impressed with Hagan's passing which has come
  a long way since the tie with Tennesse. On a couple of his big passes
  to Pritchard, he got creamed by Kenny Walker(another great player) but hung
  in there and continued to play winning football.

  It's time to start thinking about the Orange Bowl. The news media listed
  CU's probable opponents as ND or Miami. I hope it's ND for 3 reason's:

  	1. CU has had trouble defending the pass and ND is mostly a running 
  	   team.
  	2. If ND wins the rest of their games and CU beats them in the
  	   Orange bowl, CU will most likely be regarded as the national champ.
  	3. Revenge.

  The polls should change dramatically today. Does anybody have a list of
  the top 20 teams ?

  					Keith
27.862BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsMon Nov 05 1990 13:5319
    What a win!!  It doens't get much sweeter than going in to Lincoln and
    beating the Huskers convincingly.  
    
    A good point was brought up by a previous noter about the ESPN sideline
    analyst saying how the Huskers were getting down but the CU players
    were getting mad.  CU did make a good adjustment by starting to run up
    the middle, but IMO the main factor was that when it came to crunch
    time CU wanted it more.  I got the feeling that once NU got behind they
    never really had much of a chance.  As for the game
    as a whole, I thought NU's offensive game plan was conservative.  One play
    that did seem to work with mild success was the option Joseph was running
    on the perimeter, but they only used that play a few times.  Maybe a
    switch to Grant earlier would've been a good move, as Joseph's poor
    passing definitely hurt them.
    
    The only thing between the Buffs and the Orange Bowl are 2 mere
    formalities against Oklahoma State and Kansas State, both in Boulder.
    
    Joe
27.863MVP...CSC32::MASIASMon Nov 05 1990 14:115
    	I agree that Pritchard should have received the mvp.

    	I think ND will have a tough time with Tennessee, I would not count
    	on them winning.
27.864BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 05 1990 14:2835
    re: .859
    
    And you should enjoy the moment. It's got to be very sweet. I know
    the feeling.
    
    I was wrong. I over-estimated Nebraska. I think the edge Colorado had
    was mainly in the interior line. That's where games are won and lost
    and that's where this one was won. Outside of Hagen being better than
    Joseph I dont think CU has better skill players. But CU does have a
    better line on both sides and that was the difference. This game was
    won in the trenches and both McArtney and Osborne agree on it. That
    is not just MY assesment.
    
    Yea, I talked it up big before the game as usual. But I am a good
    looser. So go ahead, give me all you got Mark !!! Geez I should have
    moved to Colorado about 4 year back.   ;^)
    
    I realy did think NU was better but as it turns out they aint. But my
    team will be back. No doubt. I just want the CU/NU rivalry to be a
    clean one. 
    
    Looks like CU "layed the wood" to Nebraska. I hope their fans enjoy it
    because it's EXTREMELY hard to STAY on top. Good luck to CU in the
    Orange Bowl. I hope NU beats OU and goes to a good bowl and a chance
    for respect.
    
    By the way. I have the Omaha Sunday paper. They were extremely fair
    to CU. There was no bad mouthing, no whineing (Mickey Joseph did say
    that he WAS in bounds but no big deal was made about it) and all the
    credit in the world given to CU.
    
    Every NU fan who left the stadium was shocked BUT they realized that
    CU was better. Hey, what comes around goes around.
    
    Still Nebraska Marty and always will be !!!
27.865Fruits...CSC32::MASIASMon Nov 05 1990 14:385
    	I only harass you Marty cause you take this to seriously, its only
    	a game.
    
    	I like your last reply, its more humbled.
27.866POGO::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Nov 05 1990 14:4516
    > The only thing between the Buffs and the Orange Bowl are 2 mere
    > formalities against Oklahoma State and Kansas State, both in Boulder.
    
    > Joe
    
    Formalities??? HA
    
    OSU has lost a bunch of games but have played well in most of them.
    They beat Missouri 48-24 and played both OU and NU tough.  OU's
    option didn't work so they went to Cale Gundy's pass. Against NU
    it was NU 7-0 until the 2nd half when 2 kick returns and a fumble
    gave NU 21 points.  I don't expect OSU to whip CU but I also don't
    expect to see CU to run all over them.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.867Outcoached again!WORDY::NAZZAROCannibals aren't picky eaters!Mon Nov 05 1990 15:425
    Nebraska's non-league schedule looks reasonably challanging over the
    next several years.  But as long as nice-guy Tom Osborne is coach,
    they'll never win a big ball game.
    
    NAZZ
27.868Go BuFFs!CURIE::CHUANGWhat's so Funny 'Bout Peace, Love &amp; UMon Nov 05 1990 15:5441
    
    re. .851
    
    Marty,
    
    My condolences on a very dissapointing loss for Nebraska and a great
    win for Colorado.  I saw the game in a Pub in Boston, MA with about
    100-150 members of the Boston chapter of the CU-Boulder Alumni
    Association.  This game was very scary for us as we had many blown
    opportunities in the first three quarters, mostly due to Bienimy
    inability to hang onto the football.  In fact, I remarked to the 
    people around me that this game reminded me of last year's Orange
    Bowl game where CU blew many chances and then got behind in the
    second half.  The difference this year was that the experience
    CU gained from the Orange Bowl last year and numerous big games 
    this year helped them overcome the deficit.
    
    I agree with others that Mike Pritchard should have been the MVP.
    He made some really awesome catches that sparked CU to the comeback.
    I think Bieniemy's 4 TD's were a wash with his 4 or 5 fumbles.
    Though I still think his 137 yrds and 4 TD's on a wet field against
    a top defense like Nebraska's should make him the front runner for the
    Heisman.
    
    Colorado vs. ND in a rematch of last year's Orange Bowl.  Sounds
    pretty good to me.
    
    Marty, when you said that NU has the tough schedule next year
    and Colorado has the weak one what do you mean?  I actually
    don't know what Colorado's schedule is next year but can it
    be weaker than Nebraska's (slightly more competitive) 1991
    schedule.  Does someone know what Colorado's schedule looks
    like the next few years?
    
    Anyway, great game.  I always thought that "cornbread" tasted
    better than "Buffalo Meat" anyway....
    
    Go BuFFs!
    
    Peace/ed
    
27.869Crow and paper for breakfast eh Marty?CSC32::B_GRAHAMJust do it!Mon Nov 05 1990 16:1716
    re .860
    
    You took the words right out my mouth!  :^)
    
    Marty,
    
    What did I hear countless times from you that a Nebraska win was
    guaranteed??????  I see in front of me a piece of paper signed by
    you stating this.  All I can say is you probably ought to skip
    at least breakfast before you come back!   :^)   It's only so
    enjoyable because you force-feed us all this crap weeks before
    the game.  At least the Celtics won their first 2 games.  The
    Lakers loss was softened a good deal by the CU victory.  Let's
    get on with it!
    
    Bret
27.870BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 05 1990 17:483
    Hey Bret, look at the wording of the paper CLOSELY    ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.871Orange bowl rematc!36058::LEARYMTue Nov 06 1990 10:5317
    Re. .861
    
    ND can pass this year and if they play CU in the Orange Bowl, the CU
    defense had better not try to just contain the run or they'll get
    burned for a few TD's via the air. However the Jekyll and Hyde Irish
    defense might allow CU to run up some impressive yardage.Depends which
    Irish "D" shows up, the one that beat Miami, or the one that allowed
    powerhouse Navy to get 31 pts. Hey, it all might be moot if; A. Chris
    Zorich is out for the year with a knee injury as feared or ND loses
    just one of their remaining three games  At Tennessee, Penn St. or at
    USC.
    
    Would be an interesting rematch though!
    
    
    ML
    
27.872Sweet Victory17010::HITEBart Simpson killed Laura PalmerTue Nov 06 1990 14:3926
    As a life-long CU Buff fan, this truly is a sweet victory--to be able
    to beat both Oklahoma and Nebraska two years in a row and the
    possibility of another Big 8 Championship.  And to beat NU at home is
    no small accomplishment!
    
    I am glad of reports that the Nebraska fans were gracious in defeat,
    but I was disappointed to hear that at the Nebraska/Colorado State line
    a sign was prominently placed stating, "Sal is Dead, Go Big RED."  I
    hope that was the work of a crackpot and not a general concensus of
    feeling among Big Red fans.
    
    Last year, there were a lot of excuses made by NU fans--that CU
    exploited Sal's death and that the only way Jeff Campbell could have
    handled his punt returns so well was due to clipping.  This year, I am
    glad to hear No excuses.  The better team won that day.
    
    To Marty and all other NU fans on this conference, I offer my
    condolences.  I know how tough it is to watch your team lose.  I had
    done it for years and years and years as a Buff fan.  It seemed that it
    was preordained that CU would never be able to beat NU.  Our victories
    in 1986 and 1989 were sweet, but this one is the sweetest!
    
    I would like to congratulate Kansas for beating OSU for the first time
    since 1972.
    
    Jan
27.87339062::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Tue Nov 06 1990 15:209
    Jan thank you for not rubbing it in.  Can someone please inform TO that
    this is the 90's and not the wishbone 70s.  This guy is so out of style
    It makes me wonder how dated his wardrobe is.  As much as I love
    Nebraska mark my words: Nebreaska will never again win the national
    title unless they move towards a pro-style offense.
    
    Miffed in Westboro,
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
27.874CSC32::D_RODRIGUEZMidnight Falcon ...Wed Nov 07 1990 03:4826
    
    Hi Bret, Mark, and of course, Marty (for anyone counting, I worked with
    these guys before changing shifts about a year ago).  Long time no see 
    guys.  Just got into this notesfile 'cuz Jack told me about all the 
    hoopla goin' on.
    
    Marty ..... you laid it down pretty harsh from what I remember.  Judging 
    from your entries in here .... geezuz .... you haven't changed 'ol bud.
    
    Mark and Bret.  I sympathize with what you've had to put up with.  I
    think the both of you should get battle pay.  Marty is the sole reason
    why Jack, Pfoff, Tom Warthen, Ken Dalton, Russ Grossman, Joel David, 
    and I left the group ... Just thought you should know.
    
    Back to Marty.  Your replies to Colorado's win are exemplary.  Just
    wondering.  Will you handle it in the same manner if the RedNebs
    ever beat the BlackBuffs?  Maybe you can give us a glimpse by entering
    a couple of lines.
    
    I think this note title should be changed to 'The Marty Henderson Show
    Starring Marty Henderson' as himself.
    
    BTW, congrats on getting engaged.  She isn't a Buff fan is she? ;*)
    
    Hook 'em Horns.
                                                          
27.87539062::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Nov 07 1990 10:2215
    Football at Nebraska is no more or no less special than football
    anywhere else.  Sure, Memorial Stadium is the 3rd largest city in
    Nebraska when full.  Sure, everyone wears red.  So what?  Any college
    that's been in action for a long time and has a long and glorious
    football tradition can argue the same thing.  I will admit from having
    seen Nebraska play live once (1984 in the Carrier Dome, losing to
    Syracuse 17-9) that the Big Red has lots of great fans with a lot of
    class, and I have *NEVER* seen an offensive line come off the ball the
    way theirs does.
    
    You can just as easily argue the other way that Cornhusker football in
    Nebraska is so special because they are the only major university there
    and there isn't anything else there other than the Huskers.
    
    John
27.876NU fans36058::LEARYMWed Nov 07 1990 12:0923
    Re. .875
    
    	John,
    	I just want to reiterate what you said about NU fans. I was in the
    Orange Bowl on New Year's night 1/1/73 when NU kicked the hell out of
    Notre Dame 40-6. I believe it was Bob Devaney's sayonnara and Rich
    Glover and Johnny Rodgers went wild. Our small group of ND fans were
    surrounded by a sea of red, but the NU fans were classy and were
    quite friendly and understandably rabidly pro-NU. I must say that a
    couple politely chided us on ND's being thoroughly outclassed but it
    was all in good fun(for them!).  Maybe Marty feels that the feeling
    towards NU by its fans is special,but that same feeling exists between\
    ND and its fans,as well as most colleges and its fans.  I must admit
    that a college buddy of mine grew up in Lincoln and he did say that
    there was a special relationship between the fans and NU,but couldn't
    describe it. He said you had to be there. But that's the same feeling
    I have about Notre Dame. I can't describe it, you just have to be
    there.
    
    
    
    ML
      
27.87739062::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Wed Nov 07 1990 13:1210
    There is a special relationship between any college team and its fans. 
    To the fans, it's something special.  If you've been to games on many
    different college campuses (and I have), the same type of relationship
    with variations exists everywhere.
    
    A friend of mine is a part-time banquet waitress.  She says "everyone
    thinks their wedding is special and different.  In reality, they're all
    the same."  Same principle.
    
    John
27.878Old Dan bud Comes out AFTER the win...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Nov 07 1990 23:1554
re: .874
    
    
>    Marty ..... you laid it down pretty harsh from what I remember.  Judging 
>    from your entries in here .... geezuz .... you haven't changed 'ol bud.
    
    Old habbits die hard.
    
    Yea, I talk, but I also dont run from it after my team gets the "wood
    laid" to it. I'm also big enough to admit when I'm wrong and accept
    the consequenses.
    
    >    Mark and Bret.  I sympathize with what you've had to put up with.  I
>    think the both of you should get battle pay.  Marty is the sole reason
>    why Jack, Pfoff, Tom Warthen, Ken Dalton, Russ Grossman, Joel David, 
>    and I left the group ... Just thought you should know.
    
    Yea right Dan, and I suppose shift differential, less work, and 4x10 or
    3x12 work weeks had NOTHING to do with it huh ???    ;^)
    
>    Back to Marty.  Your replies to Colorado's win are exemplary.  Just
>    wondering.  Will you handle it in the same manner if the RedNebs
>    ever beat the BlackBuffs?  Maybe you can give us a glimpse by entering
>    a couple of lines.
    
    Just like I can accept defeat I am a good winner (Havent had much of a
    chance to show it in a few years as my teams are on the downside of
    the cycle - Huskers, Celtics, Royals). I know the dissapointment of a
    tuff loss and I dont rub it in when my team wins. The satisfaction of
    winning is enough.
    
    Just wait, next year when NU wins you'll see. Ha, I've started already!
    ;^)
    
>    I think this note title should be changed to 'The Marty Henderson Show
>    Starring Marty Henderson' as himself.
    
    
    Maybee we should go national with it, then I could eat even MORE Crow !!!
    
>    BTW, congrats on getting engaged.  She isn't a Buff fan is she? ;*)
    
    Thanks Dan. She is a Colorado native. I've got her rooting for the
    Huskers in all games except vs CU. As it should be for her.
    I've even got her wearing a T-shirt I got at the NU/CU game which
    states:  Huskers - NEBRASKA FOOTBALL, a Winning Tradition
    
    She is a smart one.   ;^)
    
>    Hook 'em Horns.
                                                          
    Aw Geeesh Dan, GIVE ME A BREAK !!!
    
    Still Nebraska Marty
27.879You 3 give me plenty to fight with...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Wed Nov 07 1990 23:5446
    re: Mark, Dan, Bret
    
    So you guys are talkin up big now AFTER your team won. Decided to come
    out of the closet now huh??? That shows real bravery. COWARDS !!!
    
    At least I had the guts (or stupidity) to verbally support my team 
    
    			      * B E F O R E *
    
    the big game!!! Carried away with it or not. And I still stand with them
    after a sound defeat !!! Tell me, were you guys behind the Buffs even half
    as much a few years ago ????? In 1983 there were about 30,000 NU fans
    at CU stadium watching NU win 69 - 19. I bet you were not one of the
    25,000 Buff fans in the stands that day.
        
    Memorial Stadium at Nebraska has been sold out EVERY game since 1962
    (An NCAA Record I might add). Nebraska did not show consistent winning
    until the LATE 60's. Husker fans are proud and loyal win or loose.
    And the sea of red will follow the Big Red to whatever bowl they go to,
    WIN * OR * LOOSE !!!
    
    Other CU fans in here have the courage and loyalty to speak up before
    their team plays. They are not just read only whimps until their team
    has the win in the hip pocket.
    
    You Weenie's were hiding in a closet with your head between your
    shaking knees waiting for the outcome before you showed any loyalty.
    You may call that smart, I call it two faced and fair weather.
    
    You don't even have the class to mention that NU had you guys totally
    worried for 3 quarters like some other Buff fans admit to. And that
    coming durring an off-year for Nebraska. A good winner always gives the
    worthy opponent some credit. McArtney had much good to say about Nebraska
    after the game (And before, by the way).
    
    So get on my case all you want. I'm loyal win or loose. I'm more of a
    man than all 3 of you whimps put together.   ;^)
    
    Glenn and the other loyal CU fans who speak up with courage for their
    team before a big game and after the game (Win or loose) have the right
    to ride me all they want. You don't because you were non-commital before
    the game.

    You cant have glory AFTER winning if you dont stand up BEFORE winning !!!
    
    A Proud Nebraska Marty who is too competitive to EVER back down !!!
27.880It gets in your blood...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Nov 08 1990 00:1322
    re: the NU fans thing...
    
    "Special" does not coincide with "unique"
    
    Yes there are schools such as ND which have a "special" relationship
    between team and fans like Nebraska does. What I am saying is that
    with makes it so special in Nebraska and somewhat (but not totally)
    "unique" is the "no other major university, small population, and no
    pro thing. It's also consistant accross the state. Most states have
    divided loyalties due to other universities in close proximity or
    the pro's.
    
    Our feelings for the Huskers run very deep, and are very
    emotional. We DO take loosing personally. The state of Nebraska basicly
    has an inferiority complex and the Huskers are our channel around that.
    Like they say, "you have to have lived there."
    
    In other words the whole state of Nebraska needs to "get a life" !!!
    :^)
    
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.881BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Nov 08 1990 00:2523
    re: .873
    
    Word in Lincoln is that NU has some Freshman QB's who are excellent
    passers. One of them threw for something like 380 yards in a Freshman
    game.
    
    TO did want to pass more in the game. Believe me, I know because I
    was at the game, it was not a day to throw the ball untill late in
    the game when it dried out. Hagen showed he is a half way decent
    passer. You can tell CU has been working on it. They were very rusty
    earlier and now they can throw OK. Not great but "good"
    
    I agree, Osborne needs to moderenize and "get a passing life."
    I also think than now the Huskers need to start getting offensive
    lineman outside of the state of Nebraska. Thru the years they have
    taken walk-on from Nebraska and have built them up into big bulky
    offensive lineman. Now I think they need scholarship dudes for the
    line as well as passing QBs.
    
    Win the big one or not, Osborne still has my respect because of his
    character and maintenance of a winning program.
    
    Armchair QB Nebraska Marty
27.882Sure wish I could have been on campus Sat. night!CSC32::GL_JOHNSONI CAN'T drive 55!Thu Nov 08 1990 03:5036
    
    	For a guy that does plenty of dishing it out, you're taking this
    defeat quite well Marty.  Kind of makes it hard to bash ya.  Year in 
    and year out, NU has good, sometimes even great teams(like those from 
    the early '70s and the Gill/Rozier/Craig era).  I'm sure that this NU 
    team(which is quite young) will learn from this game and be psyched for 
    the game against OU in Norman.  Good luck against them.  You guys will 
    be back.
    
    	I'm glad I didn't watch the live telecast of this game(I had to
    work).  I probably would have gone through the TV set after each one
    of Bienemy's fumbles(5 total - 3 lost).  Seemed like the D was sky 
    high for this one.  They basically kept CU afloat for 3 quarters.
    The 4th quarter explosion was a result of a)the already stated weight
    differential between NU's defensive line and CU's offensive line and 
    b)CU's experience in tight games.  Every game for the Buffs this year,
    with the exceptions of Iowa State and Kansas(?), wasn't decided until
    the 4th quarter.  Big advantage for CU.  
    
    	Next up, Oklahoma State.  The Buffs are favored by 28 points.  The
    CU/OSU series is interesting because the road team has won this game 
    for the last 8 years or so.  On paper, one probably sees an easy CU
    victory.  I don't buy it.  If ever there was a game which has upset 
    written all over it in capital letters, this is the one.  CU will win,
    but not overwhemingly.  Something like 34-24.
    
    						 glen j.
    
    P.S. - Marty, I was at that game back in '83 when NU came in and 
           destroyed CU 69-19.  Back then, admission was free after
           halftime.  CU managed to stay close during the first half, 
           only to watch Gill and Rozier go wild after halftime.  Seemed
           like we were in Memorial Stadium instead of Folsom Field with
           the huge contingent of NU fans.  Almost, and I repeat, almost
           made me wonder why I was rooting for CU. :)  I'll just say it 
           was well worth the pain and suffering.
27.883Two years consecutive OU-NU only for pride...4156::G_WAUGAMANThu Nov 08 1990 11:0718
    
    > Glenn and the other loyal CU fans who speak up with courage for their
    > team before a big game and after the game (Win or loose) have the right
    > to ride me all they want. You don't because you were non-commital before
    > the game.
    
    Is this me, Marty?  I thought you knew better.  I'm a Sooner fan, and
    just called the CU-NU game how I saw it.  (But I'll admit I harbor no
    ill will for the Buffs like I do for the Huskers.)
    
    Our special game is still to come, day after Thanksgiving.  I expect
    Nebraska to win (Osborne is 5-0 against OU teams with three or more
    losses, a pathetic 1-12 in the big ones against Sooner teams with two 
    or less), but with the game being in Norman you never know.  Heaven 
    knows that Gary Gibbs needs a big win over someone at this point.
    
    glenn
      
27.8849017::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipThu Nov 08 1990 12:2916
    CU is prime for an upset this weekend.  It's about the same as 
    last year:  just beating OU and NU the previous weeks and then
    playing OSU the following week.  Last year CU came to Stillwater
    and played the first half of the game like they were scrimmaging
    until they got mad and then put the game away.  This week could
    be the same thing.  There's been zero in the papers as far as
    the game is concerned.  Sure, OSU is down this year but they still
    have the 3rd top rusher in the NCAA and some good receivers.
    Defensively, they were tough against OU and NU's rushing and
    should also be good against CU's.  CU will probably need to
    pass if they want to run up the score.  The question will be
    whether OSU's new QB can move the offense against a real tough
    CU D. Since OSU will probably be up for this game more than CU
    it could be a game--atleast for a half.
    
    Cowboy
27.885Lighten up and simiplify MartyCSC32::B_GRAHAMJust do it!Thu Nov 08 1990 13:2412
    re .879
    
    Marty,
    
    You know I really don't care about college football, or any football,
    for that matter.  IF I root for Colorado, it's only because it's the
    home team and my Alma Mater.  I only "came out of the closet" because
    of all the BS you force on those who don't really care, prior to the
    game, and I couldn't/wouldn't resist/miss the chance to force-feed you
    some crow!  Keep it simple!   :^)
    
    Bret
27.886BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Thu Nov 08 1990 13:516
    re: .885
    
    My understanding, Bret, is that personal grievences are not appropriate
    for Notes.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.887Huh???CSC32::B_GRAHAMJust do it!Thu Nov 08 1990 14:1116
    re -1
    
    Marty, 
    
    If you're going to get on the subject of personal grievances, what
    about your note .879?  What would you call that?  To me it's no big
    deal either way.  If NU had won, wonderful for you, but they didn't
    and you set youself up with your coworkers for all the grief you
    are deservedly getting now.  No doubt, you are a true and loyal fan,
    but you also shot off your mouth and now you're getting the stuff
    back.  It's all part of being such a vocal fan.  As they say, "you
    made your bed......."  So please, let's not get too serious about
    this.  It's past history and I'm sure nobody else wants to see a
    rathole start.
    
    Bret
27.888Huh???CSC32::D_RODRIGUEZMidnight Falcon ...Thu Nov 08 1990 17:5577
    
    re. .879
    
    Hey, Marty, take it easy, big guy !!!  Geez.  Make one lousy reply in 
    a notesfile I never read and I get railroaded ;*)
    
    Forgive me almighty Goombah from the Land of Red.  True, it has been 
    many moons since the Sun God gave those who Husk Corn a day of Happiness.  
    Gloom has showered your Land too long.  You, who call yourself Marty 
    Of Neb.  Do not discourage.  Your People will one day Rise above the 
    Pestilence of Defeat from the Mighty Buff People.  "When?" you may ask.
    Patience.  But beware.  There is a Burnt Orange sky that is Growing 
    from the South.  It has Many more who follow than the Land of Red.
    Be watchful of this Sky.  They may Descend on Red Land and place
    Horns Of Long to Graze on Husk of Corn.  They have taken Land of Soon
    so don't piss 'em off.  (ahem) Light will Shine upon Your Land, Marty
    of Neb, when it is Time ...
    
    
    >Tell me, were you guys behind the Buffs even half as much a few 
    >years ago ????? 
    
    Are you kidding?  My Great-Great-Great (cough) Great-Great grandfather
    on my uncle's side FOUNDED CU.  He also played quarterback AND split-end 
    AT THE SAME TIME.  He had the HIGHEST PASS COMPLETION RATE IN THE NATION
    plus HE NEVER DROPPED A PASS.  That was before they also MADE HIM PLAY 
    CENTER..... then, I admit, he dropped a couple of passes .....BUT THEN 
    HE WAS THERE TO INTERCEPT THEM.  They wouldn't let him spike the ball in
    the endzone anymore 'cuz every hole it made STRUCK A VEIN OF GOLD.  I'm
    not kidding .... I was there.
    
    >In 1983 there were about 30,000 NU fans at CU stadium watching NU 
    >win 69 - 19. I bet you were not one of the 25,000 Buff fans in 
    >the stands that day.
    
    No, I wasn't, but my Great-Great-Great (cough) Great-Great grandfather
    on my Uncle's side was.  They FORCED him up into the stands.  He scored
    the 19 points in the FIRST 3 MINUTES of the ballgame BEFORE he broke
    both his legs, one arm (his passing arm), his collarbone and his head
    tackling the ENTIRE NEBRASKA TEAM.  He STILL would've been out playing 
    on the field if that 10-ALARM FIRE at the Women's Dorm hadn't gone off.  
    He rescued ALL 200 of the girls and STILL HAD TIME to court my Great-
    Great-Great (sneeze) Great-Great grandmother on my Aunt's side.  He
    got back to the game BEFORE the 1st quarter ended, but the Coach
    wouldn't let him back in.  You see, that was when WAR broke out in
    Mexico.  It's less than a footnote in history now, but he killed two
    rebel divisions SINGLE-HANDED.  When he got back to the game JUST 
    AFTER HALFTIME, Nebraska had the lead.  He quickly went in on offense
    and THREW HIMSELF A 90-YARD BOMB FOR A TOUCHDOWN.  Unfortunately, 
    after he dove and caught the ball, HE DIED.  The Refs, scratching 
    their rears trying to figure this one out, NULLIFIED the touchdown 
    (After the game, the Big 8 officials were suspended for making a bad 
    call ... but the call stood.).  After he heard the call, HE CAME BACK
    TO LIFE and argued.  The Ref promptly threw a flag and PENALIZED him
    for coming back to life.  Also, The Rulebook states that 'Once dead, 
    the player is automatically disqualified from continuing within the
    course of the game'.......... I tell ya' he was FORCED into the stands.
    I know .... I was there.
    
    >You Weenie's were hiding in a closet with your head between your
    >shaking knees waiting for the outcome before you showed any loyalty.
    
    No, I wasn't, but my Great-Great-Great (cough) Great-Great grandfather
    on my Uncle's side was.  They FORCED him into the closet the day
    of the game.  He was in New York City ADDRESSING the U.N. when they 
    told him the EMPIRE STATE BUILDING WOULD COLLAPSE if he didn't go into
    the building and hold it up.  All was fine UNTIL KING KONG decided
    to bring his family, The Kongs, ON the building and show them his 
    old stomping grounds.  Well if I didn't see it for myself, GGG(c)GG-
    grandpappy's knee's began to buckle and shake.  I couldn't believe it 
    when his head DARN NEAR DROPPED BETWEEN HIS KNEES to keep the building 
    up.  After workmen repaired the weakened beam, he SCALED UP the building
    too visit with King and the family and ended up DELIVERING the baby of 
    a very pregnant Mrs. Kong.  King was so grateful, he named the baby 
    after gramps .......... Great Kong.  I know .... I was there.
    
    Dan
27.8898750::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Thu Nov 08 1990 18:066
Ha!

	Good one Dan!
	I can always spot another Mountain Man.

Mike JN
27.890Texas MountainsCSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleThu Nov 08 1990 20:385
    
    Mountain Man from Texas?  Never heard of one of them thar things
    before.  What mountains are you from Dan?
    
    
27.891#11 returns4156::G_WAUGAMANFri Nov 09 1990 13:0611
    I hear tell that ex-Sooner legend Jack Mildren was just elected
    Attorney General of the state of Oklahoma.  Does this mean that Jack
    will be working to keep the streets safe for the citizens of Oklahoma
    from Boomer and Sooner football players present and future?  Cowboy, 
    you got any information on this interesting development?  (Remember, 
    this is the state whose Democratic Party once urged Barry Switzer to 
    run for Senate.)
    
    glenn
    
27.8929017::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipFri Nov 09 1990 15:028
    re:Jack Mildren--new AG
    
    Glenn, that's the first time I've heard that but may find out while
    we're in Oklahoma during Thanksgiving.  I don't know anything about
    his abilities (or lack of) but nothing surprises me about Oklahoma
    politics anymore.
    
    Cowboy 
27.89339062::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Fri Nov 09 1990 15:325
    Not only was Jack Mildren elected as Lieutenant Governor but JC Watts
    was elected to an Oklahoma State Board.  Not a bad election day for
    former Sooner QBs.  Mildren once played DB for the Patriots, too.
    
    John
27.894here ya go, JohnCSC32::D_RODRIGUEZMidnight Falcon ...Fri Nov 09 1990 16:5643
    
re. .890

>    Mountain Man from Texas?  Never heard of one of them thar things
>    before.  What mountains are you from Dan?
    
    John-John-JAWN.  Texas WAS A MOUNTAIN!  One BIG mountain. 10 TIMES 
    BIGGER THAN that MOLEHILL CALLED EVEREST.  You mean to tell me ya 
    *NEVER* heard of MOUNT TEXAS????  Well pull up a chair there and let 
    me give you the low-down.

    Happened before Davy Crockett hopped into San Antone to pick up a 
    BARREL of PECANTE SAUSE he'd been hearing so much about to take back 
    to Tennessee.  On his way out, he saw THE ALAMO and had a brainstorm.  
    "Hmmmmmmm ...... Condos."  (But, that's another story.)

    Ya see, Texas was SO FULL OF MOUNTAINS even GOD had trouble walking across
    it.  One day, GOD was sitting down in Oklahoma (and parts of Arkansas)
    chewing on a FEW MILLION blades of tall grass while looking across at 
    Texas.  He started shakin' his head.  "UGLY, UG-LAY" he said.  He stood
    up, dusted off his LEVI'S, grabbed his trusty shovel and started SHOVEL-
    ING ...... and SHOVELING ...... and SHOVELING THOSE MOUNTAINS out of
    Texas.  There he was SWEATING LAKES AND RIVERS under the hot, blazin'
    Texas Sun (the SUN BELONGED TO TEXAS then.  Lost it in the S&L bailout.)
    paying no mind to where he was throwing them.  

    Well sir, it was about dinner time when he got to West Texas and began
    clearing out a place BIG ENOUGH FOR EL PASO when he looks up and what
    does he see????  ALL these mountains SCATTERED ALL OVER THE WEST!!!
    "Holy Tolee-da, will ya look at that," he says to himself.  He pondered 
    a bit scratchin' his GALAXY-SIZED noggin' trying to figure out what to do.
    It was just about that time MRS. GOD calls out "Supper's ready.  Come
    get it while it's hot 'cuz I ain't gonna warm it back up."  Well ya
    don't have to tell GOD twice when supper's on the table.  So he left
    things lie as they be.  Left Texas with the Big Bend country out there.
    And the rest of Texas was scattered everyplace else.  Now I cain't say 
    that I've actually seen Big Bend, but ya don't hafta milk the cow ta 
    know it's there, now do ya ....

    That's why I feel a certain kinship with Colorado (pronounced CAH-luh-
    RAW-duh).  Can't say I'd wanna move anyplace else ... 'cept back home ;*).
    
    Dan
27.895Utah,Idaho, etc...CSC32::J_MANNINGOnly Amiga Makes it PossibleFri Nov 09 1990 18:335
    
    I had just never heard of somebody from Texas being called a Mountain
    Man.  I usually hear that term used for one of them trapper types from
    further north...
    
27.896OSU at CUBSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsFri Nov 09 1990 20:348
    Let's not overlook the OSU-CU game tomorrow.  I think the Buffs can
    cruise to a fairly easy win and I think Public Bieniemy #1 will surpass
    200 yards rushing.
    
    CU  45
    OSU 14
    
    Joe
27.897Are only 2 Big-8 teams in bowls this year?BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 12 1990 13:118
    Well, it happened, CU/ND rematch for #1. This could be a great game.
    The ND/Tenn game was a barn burner.
    
    Has Nebraska been extened a bowl invitation yet? Or are the bowls
    waiting to see what happens this week at Oklahoma? I havent heard
    anything yet.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.898PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Nov 12 1990 13:396
>    Has Nebraska been extened a bowl invitation yet? 
    
  I heard that Nebraska is going to play Geargia Tech in the Fiesta (or was 
  that the Citrus) bowl

					Keith
27.899BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsMon Nov 12 1990 14:034
    Nebraska and Ga Tech will be meeting in the Citrus Bowl.  I expect NU
    to have their way with Tech.
    
    Joe
27.900BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 12 1990 14:1421
>    Nebraska and Ga Tech will be meeting in the Citrus Bowl.  I expect NU
>    to have their way with Tech.
    
    Ohhhhh, not good. Now the Huskers CANNOT gain respect this year no
    matter what.
    
    If NU beats Oklahoma and beats Ga Tech then they will say:
    
    	"Oklahoma is not that good with 4 losses."
    	"Ga Tech is dog-meat compitition anyway, Huskers STILL havent
    	beaten a top-10 team."
    
    The sad part about this is...
    
    
    			...IT'S TRUE !!!
    
    Oh well, next year HAS to be better. At least it's a New Years Day
    Bowl.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.901FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Nov 12 1990 14:454
    Hey, don't feel bad Marty.  With OSU only winning one game in
    the BIG-8 I haven't had too much to get excited about either.
    
    It'll only get better....Cowboy
27.902CU will win the Orange Bowl and Ntl TitleDENVER::HITEBart Simpson killed Laura PalmerMon Nov 12 1990 21:246
    Prediction:
    
    Colorado will win the Orange Bowl AND the National Title on Jan 1.
    You heard it first--yes, right here in the DEC Notes File.
    
    Jan
27.903ND will crush CU!!! Just like lasted year.RAVEN1::M_PHILLIPSFlirting With DisasterTue Nov 13 1990 02:135
    ND to win National Title, G.A.Tech will beat NU by 13, UVA will lose
    to SEC Champ. Clemsuck will win Hall'o Fame. and Me and My Carolina
    Gamecocks can watch all this at home. :-) :-)
    
                                                               M.J.
27.904FSOA::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Tue Nov 13 1990 14:2010
    Marty,
    
         Did you heard about the Neb. LB (Croel ?) whi is considered the #1
    pick in the upcoming draft ?  You know, for all the talk about this
    being TO best defensive team it collapsed when the game was on the
    line.  I am so disappointed and tired of saying "wait 'til next year".
    By the way, I think you should bring back your old p-name  "TO get a
    passing life".
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
27.905BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Nov 13 1990 14:3427
    re: John -1
    
    Yea I know what you mean. "Wait till next year" sucks real bad !!!
    
    This is a good defense, it's just that CU exploited it's weakness
    with CU's strength. The NU strength is speed, the CU stength
    (offensively) is size. 
    
    When CU tried to option NU stuffed it consistantly with speed.
    When CU woke up and started running straight up the middle NU
    could do nothing about it. Ave NU defensive starting lineman is
    240 lbs. Ave CU starting offensive lineman is 287 lbs.
    
    It's really that simple. Now that NU has converted to speed they
    must find a proper balance between speed and size.
    
    Irregardless, the NU defense does have some standouts. Croel, Walker
    (the deaf defensive lineman), and DB Cooper should all go in the
    draft. There are a few others who may go also.
    
    About "TO Get a Passing Life" - Word is in Lincoln that NU has a couple
    of Freshman QB's who can pass well. We shall see what develops in the
    next few years.
    
    Citrus VS Tech - What a bummer.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.906NOT a Shootout this year...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Nov 13 1990 16:069
    Is Nebraska at Oklahoma this Saturday on TV ???
    
    This game always used to mean EVERYTHING and was the feature game
    on network TV.
    
    Now it's just for PRIDE !!! NU and OU were 5-5 against each other in
    the 80's. NU has won the last 2.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.907FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Nov 13 1990 16:083
    It's not this Saturday, it's on the day after Thanksgiving.
    
    John
27.908A Vols fan opinionRAVEN1::RJONESThu Nov 15 1990 06:3711
    Colorado WILL beat Notre Dame for the national championship...
    
    We played both (CU without Eric the great), and the Buffs have what it
    takes. I hope I didn't give all you CU fans the kiss of death....
    Like I said before, it will depend on what happens during that month
    off. That is when coaches earn their money.
    
    Jan, Don't forget my shirt...
    
    Let's beat Ole Miss and taste that Sugar
    Rich
27.909OSU-CU game commentsBSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsFri Nov 16 1990 14:2833
    I finally got around to watching my tape of the OSU-CU game last night. 
    The Buffs only led 17-7 at halftime before exploding for 3 TD's in
    about the first 8 minutes of the 3rd quarter to open up a 38-7 lead. 
    After that it was pretty much garbage time and the Buffs cruised the
    rest of the way to a 41-22 win.  Hagan threw 4 TD passes, but also 2
    passes intercepted in the endzone, so the score could have been worse.   
    Bieniemy ran well and seemed 1 step away from breaking quite a few of
    his runs.  He did have a couple of nice long runs however, 1 of which
    went for a TD.  The CU defense played well, but OSU had pretty good
    success passing the ball when the Buffs didn't get pressure on Ford,
    the OSU QB.
    
    The OSU defense came out with a stacked front very similar to what
    Stanford pulled against the Buffs earlier in the season, but the
    difference here was CU went to the air and burned the OSU secondary. 
    OSU was also blitzing their inside linebackers on almost every play.  But
    for the first half, OSU held the Buffs in check, forcing them into
    3rd and long situations.  One thing that did seem to work well against
    this gambling defense was Bieniemy right up the middle, but OSU was
    able to contain the perimeter and put some good pressure on Hagan when
    he went back to pass.  Overall, it was a combination of OSU's gambling
    defense paying off and the Buffs being somewhat flat in the first half,
    but in the early part of the 3rd CU was able to pull away.
    
    Also, I was very impressed with OSU tailback Gerald Hudson.  This guy
    has a unique ability to make defenders miss and is a real pleasure to watch
    once he gets in the open field.  A player nobody really knows much
    about, but I believe he is 3rd in the nation in rushing.
    
    Pritchard had another good game for CU, getting deep on a couple passes
    and he scored 2 TD's.
    
    Joe
27.910BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Nov 20 1990 15:2813
    This Friday it's Nebraska at Oklahoma for pride. Since this isent such
    a HUGE game then maybee nice dude TO cam pull it out.
    
    This game does still mean a lot though. If Nebraska wins and then wins
    Jan. 1 they could still finish top-5.
    
    If your a blue chip kid then that sounds much better than 3rd in
    conference, loose the bowl and finish 24th.
    
    NU and OU are STILL rivals and these 2 teams have their immense pride.
    It could be a good game. It's on TV isent it?
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.911See note .879BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Nov 20 1990 15:3718
    re: .855 & .879
    
    Well, Mark Massias has finnaly found the guts to come out of the
    closet and commit * BEFORE * a game.
    
    He has publicly stated in the IOSUB area of VSG district at CXO3
    3 predictions:
    
    	CU will win "big" over ND
    
    	OU will beat Nebraska "easily"
    
    	GT will "cream" Nebraska
    
    Rather bold I must say, that is for a pre-game closet COWARD !!!  ;^)
    (Please note the smiley face)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.912BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsTue Nov 20 1990 16:1014
    The NU-OU game is on CBS Friday at 12:30 pm MST.
    
    Another great game this past weekend for OSU tailback Gerald Hudson. 
    His stats against Iowa State were something like 26 carries for 264
    yards.
    
    In the Buffs' romp over KSU 3rd string QB Vance Joseph (who is the
    younger brother of Husker QB Mickey, BTW) played most of the 2nd half
    and linebacker Alfred Williams lined up at tight end and even caught a
    pass.  He said it's something he has wanted to do all season.  Bieniemy
    had something like 118 yards rushing in slightly more than a half of
    playing time.
    
    Joe
27.913PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonTue Nov 20 1990 16:358
  Yes, Marty, I'm also looking forward to a great game between NU and OU
  on friday. Both teams are very very good. However, I think NU is slightly 
  better but they are playing in Norman which is the reason why I will
  make the Sooner's a 1 point favorite.

  I've never rooted for the Sooner's and won't start now. Go Nebraska !!

			Keith(Black and Gold fan but still like the Big Red)
27.914Gundy offers hope for OklahomaNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 26 1990 11:3228
    Finally, a big win for Coach Gary Gibbs, a solid 45-10 thrashing of the 
    hated Cornhuskers in Norman on Friday.  This was easily the best
    defensive effort by the Sooners this year, as defense has been their
    biggest question mark.  A couple of tremendous hits to cause turnovers,
    which yielded benefits later on as the Nebraska receivers became
    gun-shy-- the interception return for touchdown by DeQuasie to finish
    things off was a direct result of a Husker wideout pulling his arms in
    on an overthrown ball so he wouldn't get nailed.  Yet even with the
    turnovers, Nebraska couldn't stop the Sooner run or even the occasional
    long pass play.  Oklahoma outgained Nebraska almost 2-to-1 in total
    offense on the day.
    
    All in all, though, an unsatisfying 8-3 season that in retrospect
    should have been much better.  No way the Sooners were up to beating
    Colorado, but the Texas and Iowa State games were OU's to win and they
    gave both away late, in no small part due to some poor kicking by R.D.
    Lashar in the clutch (which is why Gibbs ran him out there to give the
    senior one last shot against Nebraska; Lashar once again was having a
    terrible game in this poor season).  10-1 would have been awful nice, 
    but if you're going to choke it, might as well be while on probation.
    Cale Gundy provides an excellent outlook for the future over the next
    three seasons.  I'd heard he could pass, but I'm pleased that he runs
    so well, too.  Put a defense out there and things will be back to
    normal in Norman...
    
    glenn
       
27.915Barry's GhostSHALOT::MEDVIDIf I could be God tonight...Mon Nov 26 1990 11:4511
>    This was easily the best
>    defensive effort by the Sooners this year, as defense has been their
>    biggest question mark.  
    
    I would say that the Sooners' best defensive play was running the
    Nebraska QB into the bench.  The Switzer legacy lives on.
    
    The Cornhuksters wouldn't have won anyway, but Oklahoma still remains a
    dirty team.
    
    	--dan'l
27.916#40MILPND::VLASAKTennesse 45 Florida 3Mon Nov 26 1990 11:4810
    
    Ya' forgot to mention the cheap-shot that took the regular Nebraska
    quarter back, Mickey Joseph, out of the game early in the first quarter.  
    
    The way they played, OU probably would have won anyway, but the loss
    of Joseph took NU out of their game plan and the interceptions thrown 
    by the backup QB, Grant, certainly contributed to the rout.
    
    Bob V.
    
27.917Two more to go...CSC32::MASIASMon Nov 26 1990 11:513
    
    
    	Well Marty, one prediction down and two to go...
27.918Oklahoma-Nebraska always runs hotNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 26 1990 12:0927
    The loss of Joseph definitely hurt, because his back-up was so clearly
    ill-prepared (or inferior to Joseph, whichever).  I agree that it most 
    probably accounted for the size of the rout, but not for the end result.  
    Not when you can't stop a big, slow fullback from pounding up the 
    middle and continuing on for huge gains.
    
    I guess you guys don't put much stock in Joseph's statement that he
    thought the man was trying to hold him up from hitting the bench (they
    definitely need to move those things back, though)?  I'll admit from
    the replay that's not what it looked like, but that's reportedly what 
    Joseph said.  And how about that even more blatant retaliation by Croel 
    on Gundy?  In any case, the generalization that Oklahoma plays dirty is 
    completely unfounded.  Over the years some players have been
    repulsively unsportsmanlike (Brian Bosworth is the all-time leader in
    this category, and he butted heads with Switzer over it), but they've 
    never been a particularly heavily personal-foul plagued team.  
    
    For what it's worth, the dirtiest player I've seen in college football 
    the past couple of years (and I have seen a lot of football), has been 
    Penn State's Mark D'Onofrio, which works against just a few of the more
    commonly-held stereotypes.  He was pretty calm Saturday, though, as he
    didn't try to take on the entire Pitt bench at the end of the game this
    year.
    
    glenn
      
27.919"Oklahoma is OK"SHALOT::MEDVIDIf I could be God tonight...Mon Nov 26 1990 12:2714
    Glenn, I agree whole-heartedly about D'Onofrio.  Can you imagine this
    dude playing for Glanville?  Scarey.  Matt Millen is also an
    embarassment to the Penn State "honor your opponent, officials, and
    opposing fans" tradition.  
    
    But even Joe Paterno has gotten away from that in the 80's.  Used to be
    he required any player who scored a TD to find the nearest official,
    hand him the ball, and walk off the field.  No celebrating.  Now he
    lets them dance and do whatever.
    
    I hadn't heard what Joseph said.  Interesting.  I wonder if he saw the
    film before he said that.
    
    	--dan'l
27.920MILPND::VLASAKTennesse 45 Florida 3Mon Nov 26 1990 12:3916
    
    First of all, the hit on the OU quarter back, Gundy, was 5-10 yards 
    inbounds, not 5-10 yards out of bounds like the hit on Joseph.  
    
    Secondly, the only "dirty" part of the play was when the first tackler
    grabbed the side of the face mask.  As you well know, he let go of it
    quickly and there were NO flags on the play.  He did not twist Gundy's 
    head. A five yard penalty should have been called, but it happened so
    fast the refs must not have seen it.  
    
    Sure, Gundy was rolled up by two players and briefly taken out of action,
    but that is part of the game.  Or are you suggesting a second tackler 
    shouldn't get involved in bringing down a runner?  
    
    Bob V.
    
27.921NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 26 1990 13:1824
    
    We're obviously talking about a different play, Bob V.  The one I'm
    talking about came immediately on the series after Joseph got hurt.
    Gundy had run with the ball for a first down at around the 50-yard line
    and had practically come to a full stop out of bounds on the Nebraska 
    side of the field when Croel clocked (not tackled) him.  Gundy did not 
    miss any playing time after the hit.
    
    In the even scarier department, Dan'l-- I was browsing through Barry
    Switzer's book in the store the other day when I was taken aback by 
    the foreward to that fine literary work.  You guessed it: the
    introducer was none other than Joe Paterno, and he was referring to 
    Switzer as his "good friend", as a man with absolutely no taint of 
    hypocrisy, and in other glowing terms that I didn't quite expect.  
    (I recall Paterno making a similar reference to his "friend" in his
    apology for that joking comment about Switzer and Sherrill that you 
    mentioned previously.)  As many who have looked at him from all sides 
    have said, Switzer is quite a strange combination of good and bad who 
    nonetheless has unfairly taken most of the blame for all that reeks at 
    the University of Oklahoma from the president on down (and did so 
    before him).  I might even buy the book when it comes out in paperbook.
    
    glenn
    
27.922They Layed the wood to us...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 26 1990 14:1239
    Weeelllllll, what can I say. I dont think the Joseph thing changed the
    outcome of the game. Nebraska has obviously fallen off this year even
    more than last year.
    
    I am not that impressed with Mickey Joseph anyway. I hope he does not
    start next year. And Grant is even worse. I only hope that what I have
    heard about NU's Freshman QB's is true. They are supposed to be good
    passers.
    
    The Nebraska defense is very speedy but cannot stop a big (Physically)
    team running up the middle. They are also weak against the pass.
    
    Looks like a few bowls messed up BIG time by jumping the gun and
    offering early invitations. Citrus - Nebraska vs GA Teck.
                                Whatever bowl took Virginia.
    	                        Orange - by taking ND so early rather
    	                                 than Miami.
    
    Well, I still love my Huskers. I must now admit that they have fallen
    off dramatically. One note - I listened to the Wednesday night KFAB
    (Omaha Nebraska Football network flagship station AM 1110) broadcast
    of the "Talk to Tom" call in show. It was stated that the NU coaching
    staff was worried about the Huskers because they were "down in
    confidence" and were having trouble believing in themselves.
    
    I submit that Oklahoma was mentally up for this game. See my earlier
    notes about how this is OU's bowl game etc...   and NU was not a
    confident team coming into this game. The early loss of Joseph hurt
    that phase even more I'm sure.
    
    The KFAB post game stated that even though it was a blowout, to
    Nebraska this was not as dissapointing as the CU loss.
    
    O well, as a Nebraska fan I'm used to saying - Wait till next year. 
    ;^)
    
    Big Red Loyal Forever,
    
    Nebaska Marty
27.923BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 26 1990 14:147
    By the way, in the last 12 years the head to head matchup of Nebraska
    vs Oklahoma stand at...
    
    
    				...6 and 6 !!!
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.924Danny NeeSHALOT::MEDVIDIf I could be God tonight...Mon Nov 26 1990 15:007
    Hey Marty, do you follow Nebraska Hoops?  I was wondering how Danny Nee
    was doing.  He hasn't exactly turned Nebraska around like he did Ohio
    University a few years back.
    
    Is his job secure?
    
    	--dan'l
27.925Marty's certainly not a fair-weather fanWORDY::NAZZAROMy best advice: Hire a better lawyerMon Nov 26 1990 15:365
    I gotta admire you Marty, for admitting the weaknesses of your 
    team, but stickin' by them.  That kind of loyalty is usually in short
    supply.  Hope your Huskers reward that loyalty with a bowl victory.
    
    NAZZ
27.926FTMUDG::REEDOklaSt--#29 NCAA Wrestling ChampionshipMon Nov 26 1990 15:5916
    > Also, I was very impressed with OSU tailback Gerald Hudson.  This guy
    > has a unique ability to make defenders miss and is a real pleasure to watch
    > once he gets in the open field.  A player nobody really knows much
    > about, but I believe he is 3rd in the nation in rushing.
    
    His 264 yards on 26 carries was good enough to put him in 1st place,
    passing Bieniemy.  Hudson looks to be a combination of Thomas and
    Sanders.  He has Thomas' eyes and patience when looking for a hole
    to run through.  He has some of Sanders quick moves.  Hudson's
    speed is about like Thomas'--fast but can get caught after a long
    run.  I'd be real surprised if he doesn't get picked ahead of all
    or most 'small' backs.  Small backs seem to be doing well in the
    NFL now when you look at what Thomas and Sanders have done already.
    
    Cowboy
    
27.927You still got 2 of the last 3, though...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 26 1990 16:1510
         
    >				...6 and 6 !!!
    
    Actually, it's 7-5 Oklahoma, for those of us who place importance in
    such trivialities (and 8-6 over the last 13 years if you count the 
    *two* games in the 1978 season).  Osborne is 6-13 versus the Sooners
    overall.
    
    glenn
    
27.928BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 26 1990 16:469
    re: .925
    
    Thanks Nazz. Hey, you got me into a Celts game a few years back. Me
    and Keith. Remember. I sure appreciated that.
    
    By the way, I'm not a fair weather Celts fan either. Besides, my Chiefs
    are doing good.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.929Husker Hoops...BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 26 1990 16:5713
    re: few back
    
    I dont get much news about the Nebraska hoops team. Danny Nee is up
    against it. It's sort of like Kansas in football. How do you recruit
    against the football Hukser, and Sooners. If basketball how do you
    recruit against the basketball Mizzou tigers and Kansas Jayhawks?
    
    I dont know how solid Danny Nee's position is at Nebraska. I'll see
    what I can find out. By the way, I live in Woodland Park Colorado so
    Husker news is hard to come by (I am a Nebraska Native and lived in
    Omaha most of my life).
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.930Nee is/was a good recruiterSHALOT::MEDVIDIf I could be God tonight...Mon Nov 26 1990 17:0416
    FWIW, Danny Nee did wonders recruiting at Ohio U.  He had to recruit
    against Ohio State, West Virginia, Pitt, Akron, Dayton, Xavier, Cinci,
    Cleveland State, etc.
    
    What he did was scoop up some local talent and then get some kids from
    Philly.  Then he used his Brooklyn connection (where he was from) to
    get some kids out of NYC.  Turned the whole program into a winner in
    two years.
    
    Guess it's a little more difficult to talk Philly and NYC kids into
    coming out to Nebraska.  
    
    Nee was a prep teammate of Lew Alcindor and they are good friends.  If
    he loses his Nebraska job, he won't stay down long.  He's a winner.
    
    	--dan'l
27.931BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Nov 26 1990 17:1117
    From interviews and things I've heard about Nee he seems really good.
    I think he does well with the talent he gets at Nebraska.
    
    Nee cant do it the same way he did at Ohio. Omaha, and the state of
    Nebraska has little local talent to draw from. The state has a pop
    of 1.5 million total. The football team gets a few good local guys
    but most of it comes from other places. Same in basketball. The Omaha
    /Lincoln area is about 1 million total population and that includes
    some population from Iowa.
    
    Willis Reed had Benoit Benjamen at Creighton (in Omaha) and couldent
    do anything. It would take a miracle for Nee to have a high degree
    of sucess at Nebraska. In the same vein, considering these things,
    the Nebraska football programs success is nearly miraculous.
    
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.932FSOA::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Mon Nov 26 1990 17:2917
    NU really got bushwacked this past weekend.  After seeing my beloved
    Cowboys win a game I felt great, but Big Red sure was depressing to
    watch.  TO has got to realize that there are things fundamentally wrong
    with this team and that if he does not straighten house he will no
    longer get great talent coming to NU.
    
    This was supposed to be his "best defensive team ever" and yet they
    have got beaten, no no badly beaten, the last two games.  The Ol is
    adequate against mediocre teams but are not what you would expect from
    NU (no All-Americans this year are there ?), the WRs are non-existent,
    the DL, with the exception of Kenny Walker) is weak, and the DBs can't
    cover anybody.
    
    TO clean house or face much the same next year.  Marty, I can relate to
    your dissapointment in NU this year.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
27.933BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsMon Nov 26 1990 20:4513
    Despite a 9-2 record, has to be a disappointing season for the Huskers. 
    In their only 2 tough games, they were beaten pretty good.  But going
    into the season, NU had a young team, especially on offense.  The way
    OU moved the ball on their defense was quite a surprise to me.  After
    NU seemed capable of making a game by getting within 21-10, OU just
    cruised the rest of the way.  As for OU, a nice finish to a season that
    started great but hit rock-bottom with that 3-game losing streak.
    
    I still expect NU to win the Citrus Bowl over GT, although their morale
    has to be extremely low after going from national title contenders to
    the lower part of the top-25 in the last 3 games.
    
    Joe
27.934BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Tue Nov 27 1990 12:353
    What did Nebraska get ranked this week, if at all.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.93519thSHALOT::MEDVIDIf I could be God tonight...Tue Nov 27 1990 12:391
    
27.936GOLF::KINGRMy mind is a terrible thing to use...Tue Nov 27 1990 12:513
    Nebraska really ranked this weekend Marty!!!!
    
    REK
27.937Orange Bowl rematchNEMAIL::LEARYMTue Nov 27 1990 18:0716
    Here's an ND fan looking forward to the Orange Bowl rematch with
    the Buffs!  Can you CU fans enlighten me on the Buffs' strengths
    and weaknesses on "d"? I know the "o" strengths.
    
    Got any Orange Bowl Tix for sale?
    
    You guys think Husker fans are feeling low,how about Cavalier fans!
    But on second thought,maybe Virginia fans are used to feeling low this
    time of year. Got to feel bad for George Welsh and the UVA football
    players though.
    Here's also hoping that NU rebounds and knocks off Georgia Tech in the
    Citrus Bowl.
    
    
    ML
     
27.938PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonTue Nov 27 1990 18:4126
>    Here's an ND fan looking forward to the Orange Bowl rematch with
>    the Buffs!  Can you CU fans enlighten me on the Buffs' strengths
>    and weaknesses on "d"? I know the "o" strengths.
    
  The Buff's biggest strength is OLB Alfred Williams. He rushes the passer
  very well, he's great against the run and I've never seen anybody break
  one of his tackles. Most people expect Williams to be one of the
  first 5 picks in the NFL draft. Kanavis McGee is the other OLB (bookend)
  and is also very highly rated by the pros. Nose guard Joel Steed has been 
  solid but doesn't seem to make many big plays. Tackle Gary Howe always 
  seems to make big plays but is underated by the pros since he's only 6' 
  (but weights 265). Inside Linebacker's, Gary Biekert and Chad Brown play 
  the run fairly well but aren't as good with the pass. In the defensive 
  backfield, Dave McCloughan who is one of the fastest Buffs is the best 
  and he also has the highest average for best punt returns in college 
  football. Tim James and Deon Figures seem to have improved later in the 
  season.

  I see the Buff defense as very good against the run but only OK against the
  pass. In the first game of the season, Tennesse had no trouble passing
  against CU, Illinois also had good success. CU's defense seemed to 
  improve against the pass as the year went on but they also played more
  teams that emphasized the run like Okla and Nebr. I think ND will have
  to pass effectively to win the orange bowl.

  					Keith
27.939RAVEN1::D_SMITHWed Nov 28 1990 12:3212
27.940bring your wallet to miamiNEMAIL::LEARYMWed Nov 28 1990 13:4120
    Re.938
    Keith,Thanks for the info on the CU defense. I'd be interested to see
    the Buff's game plan on offense because you never know which Irish 
    D is going to show up. I still think that CU is going to have to pass
    effectively also to win. Man, the Irish middle on D has been soft all
    year against the pass ( Penn St and Stanford really took advantage,as
    did UT and Miami even tho the Irish won those two games.)
    
    Re.939
    
    David,
     Are you planning to make the trip to South Bend next Nov.9 for the
    Vols-Irish rematch? If you do,I hope the ND fans will be as
    hospitable as the fans were in Knoxville. In reading the ND football
    mag,Blue&Gold, the writers and fans raved about Tennessee hospitailty
    even after the game!  
    
    
    ML
    
27.941No plans yet,but...RAVEN1::D_SMITHFri Nov 30 1990 10:1612
27.942BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsFri Nov 30 1990 13:357
    The Big-8 coaches voted CU coach Bill McCartney and KSU coach Bill
    Snyder as co-Big 8 coaches of the year.  Alfred Williams was voted
    defensive player of the year, Bieniemy was voted as offensive player of
    the year, and CU kicker Jim Harper was picked as offensive newcomer of
    the year.
    
    Joe
27.943BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Dec 03 1990 12:467
    Osborne is under intense fan pressure in Nebraska. Rumor has it that
    Devany will retire, Osborne will take over as athletic director and...
    
    
    ...Nebraska will hire Barry Switzer as head football coach.   ;^)
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.944CSC32::J_HERNANDEZGreenpiece,WhatALeprechaunGetsMon Dec 03 1990 13:083
    >>...Nebraska will hire Barry Switzer as head football coach.   ;^)
    
      Dat's like Isreal hiring Sadum Hussein as it's defense minister.
27.945BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Mon Dec 03 1990 14:338
    re: Switzer at Nebraska
    
    It's just a joke, it's only a joke...
    
    However, the part about Coach Osborne under big time pressure is not a
    joke.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.946BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsWed Dec 05 1990 11:429
    CU offensive coordinator Gerry DiNardo was hired as the head coach at
    Vanderbilt on Monday.  Ironically, ND also lost their offensive
    coordinator to Kent State, but he will stay at ND through the Orange Bowl
    game.  DiNardo is taking over at Vandy immediately.
    
    CU outside linebacker Alfred Williams was announced as the winner of
    the Butkus award yesterday, given to the nation's best linebacker.
    
    Joe
27.947Watch out, here comes NebraskaSHALOT::MEDVIDNovember spawned a monsterTue Dec 18 1990 11:487
    Nebraska is 9-1 and ranked 22nd in the latest AP poll.  Danny Nee seems
    to be doing the job in football country.  And apparently he's got his
    star player on some kind of suspension until the new year.  If they can
    hang on until this guy comes back, the huskers could be a force to be
    reckoned with in the Big 8 this year.
    
    	--dan'l
27.948BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Dec 28 1990 11:1610
    Since I'll be on the road New Years day, I'm gonna have to set my
    vcr timer to record the Huskers in the Citrus bowl. Does anyone have
    the time and the network?
    
    I read in the USA today that Osborne has closed all bowl practices. No
    press. He's trying to get down and very serious. I still think there
    is a better than 50% chance that NU will loose. But I'm still pull'n
    for em.
    
    Nebraska Marty
27.949Jan 1, 1:30, ABCHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughFri Dec 28 1990 11:250
27.950Doesn't Nebraska have 2 losses?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 28 1990 11:381
    
27.951BSS::M_HENDERSONBart Simpson - My Hero, Man !!!Fri Dec 28 1990 13:343
    re: .949
    
    1:30 is eastern time, right?