| Depends on how you mounted the tape. Using COPY with a tape
mounted /FOREIGN a file with sequential file organization produces
one tape block per input record.
> copy command. For example, a 1413 block file copied to tape with a
> copy/log command is reported as 89520 records transferred to tape.
Could the input file have 89,520 records in 1413 blocks? This would
be an average record size of around 8 bytes.
> Mounting the tape with a variety of record sizes has no impact.
Real commands would help. The MOUNT/RECORD only has no meaning
when using COPY. COPY always tries to maintain the record size
from the input file. If the tape is mounted /FOREIGN and the input file
has a fixed-length record format then COPY will stash as many records
into a block of size n (from MOUNT/BLOCKSIZE=n).
If the tape is not mounted /FOREIGN then COPY (thru RMS) will use the
appropriate ANSI file format on tape using the blocksize from the mount
command.
Do you have a DIR/FULL of the file(s)? How did they mount the tape?
How is the tape used afterwards? What format do they expect to be
on the tape?
Guenther
|