| Title: | DEC/EDI |
| Notice: | DEC/EDI V2.1 - see note 2002 |
| Moderator: | METSYS::BABER |
| Created: | Wed Jun 06 1990 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 3150 |
| Total number of notes: | 13466 |
Hi,
- DECEDI server 3.1A
- GUI on WIN95 - Informix and CC32 3.1A
Problem: Unable to "compile" mapping tables that call "Trading
Partner" or "Trading Group" specific EDI documents:
The import of such documents in the mapping table is correct but
when you create a mapping set using that "TP" specific (with
"private" it works) document the compilation fails:
Error message: Compiling ...
Error: Map Set doesn't match any document
specified for Table
We noted than in the table.lis file regarding the table:
----------------------------------------------------
DOCUMENT DEFINITION:
STANDARD: EDIFACT
VERSION: 1A
DEC/EDI EXTERNAL FILE: ORDRSP
DEC/EDI INTERNAL FILE: ORDRSP
PARTNER ID: BULLAN
GENERIC: [X] That shouldn't appear like that
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION:
EXTRACTED:
.......
------------------------------------------------------
INDEX OF MAPPING SETS:
--- DEC/EDI Document Definition ---
FBDOCTYPE PARTNER GENERIC STD VER INTERNAL-DOCTYPE
1 ORDRSP BULLAN [X] EDIFACT 1A ORDRSP
.......
-------------------------------------------------------
MAPPING SET DEFINITION: (mapping set #1)
FB DOCTYPE: ORDRSP
PARTNER ID: BULLAN
STANDARD: EDIFACT
VERSION: 1A
DEC/EDI EXTERNAL DOCTYPE: ORDRSP
DEC/EDI INTERNAL DOCTYPE: ORDRSP
GENERIC DEFINITION:
INDEX OF MAPS:
.......
--------------------------------------------------------
Very strange isn't it ??? Mismatch between the GENERIC DEFINITION
above and what appears in the DOCUMENT DEFINITION part of the
table !!!!
Same problem if you try to use "Trading Group" EDI documents:
Error at compilation
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3018.1 | known bug | IJSAPL::DEWIJK | GJ from the Dutchlands | Tue Feb 18 1997 23:47 | 6 |
Hi,
looks like the same problem I encountered, see note 2881.
next step would be a fix, or an official IPMT.
GJ
| |||||