[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hbahba::cam_sports

Title:Sports 93-96 Archive. No new notes allowed
Notice:Chainsaw's last standSPORTS_97
Moderator:HBAHBA::HAAS
Created:Mon Jan 11 1993
Last Modified:Tue Apr 15 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:302
Total number of notes:117855

155.0. "Winter Olympics" by MSE1::FRANCUS (NY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!) Fri Jan 07 1994 05:07

    
    The Crazy Met
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
155.1guess security folks didn't learn from the Seles incidentMSE1::FRANCUSNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 05:097
    Nancy Kerrigan was attacked after a practice session at the US Figure
    Skating Championships. She may or may not skate tomorrow afternoon.
    Apparently she can appeal to the USOC for a spot on the olympic team
    even if she does not compete this weekend.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.2SALEM::TIMMONSA waist is a terrible thing to mindFri Jan 07 1994 10:1719
    "Good" and bad news regarding this-
    
    "Good" is that she apparently didn't sustain any career-threating
    injury.
    
    Bad is thinking of all the time and effort she's put into preparing for
    this, the most important skating event in her young life.
    
    I remember when my daughter was hurt early in her senior year, and it
    wiped out the remaining season for her.  This was the year she wanted
    to shine for the scouts and college coaches.  While here injury was
    freaky, it did happen in the heat of a game.  Kerrigan, on the other
    hand, was viciously attacked and the only possible connection I can
    think of at this time is that it was an attempt to keep her from making
    the team so that some other skater would make it.  Kinda like the Seles
    attack.  What a damn shame.
    
    Lee
    
155.3what now...SALEM::STIGFri Jan 07 1994 12:014
    and the guy wasn't even caught. Apparently he ran thru the security
    guards and spectators and no one stopped him. What a real shame...
    
                            stig
155.4VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDNoTeam-NoBudFri Jan 07 1994 12:485
    	The last two attacks on athletes at a sporting event have happened
    at a tennis match and a figure skating practice, both sports that
    supposedly have sophisticated fans.
    
    				/Don
155.5MKFSA::LONGI know a survivor!Fri Jan 07 1994 12:525
	/Don, my guess is it's because they don't have Foxboro-Stadium-
	Neandrathals working those events.  Well, at least not yet.


	billl
155.6GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsFri Jan 07 1994 13:065
    Detriot: it's no place for... never mind...
    
    Seles was attacked by a Graf fan.
    Think this guy was into Katerina Witt?
    
155.7CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 13:1714
The Seles thing reflected the passion with which many Europeans follow their
sporting heros.  I suspect the Kerrigan thing will be the same.  

The interesting thang here is the way the scenario will play out:

	If she doesn't compete, she can appeal to the US Olympic Comittee
	for a spot on the team, based upon the fact that she is deserving,
	and that she was injured during the chapeenships.  If on the other 
	hand, she toughs it out and goes out and competes while injured, 
	she is totally on he rown to make the team.  

	What would you do?

=Bob=
155.8GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsFri Jan 07 1994 13:354
    I thought there was a rule for her to appeal she had to have earned a 
    medal in the last championships (which she didn't do) or some other
    criteria she didn't meet.  That was last I heard.
    
155.9fyiFRETZ::HEISERno, I'm very, very shyFri Jan 07 1994 14:121
    She is going to try and skate today.
155.10CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 07 1994 14:2212
    Yabbut,
    The swelling has spread to the back of her knee which is not good
    according to some doc I heard on the radio. The docs might not let
    her perform. I hope the USOC puts her on the team in any event.
    What a tragedy. They oughtta let Nancy skate on this guy's face
    fer punishment if they catch up with it
    
    MikeL
    
    BTW, the first thang she should due is git her lawyer to take
    a nice look at security in Cobo. Ridiculous.
    
155.11ver botenBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredFri Jan 07 1994 15:078
>   <<< Note 155.6 by GWEN::ASHE "Detriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. Champs" >>>
>

>    Think this guy was into Katerina Witt?
    
    Won't touch this one.

	Kevin
155.12related to the "Strangler"???SALEM::STIGFri Jan 07 1994 15:503
    We have a crazy running around..."The Boston Basher"...
    
              stig
155.13CSC32::GAULKEFri Jan 07 1994 15:5112
    
    
    >>The Seles thing reflected the passion with which many Europeans
    >>follow their sporting heros.  I suspect the Kerrigan thing will be
    >>the same.
    
    
       Sheeeeeit, I sure hope Sammy Leilei doesn't get trampled by 
    a water buffalo!
    
    
      
155.14a real shameMSE1::FRANCUSNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 16:055
    WCVB just reported that Kerrigna will not compete in the US
    Championships.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.15Medical DecisionWREATH::SCOPAFri Jan 07 1994 18:1519
    Nancy Kerrigan's doctors have said that she cannot bend her knee and
    that they have drained her knee of fluid. They are fearful that any
    activity will cause furthere damage. She will undergo an MRI to
    determine if any cartilage damage resulted from the attack.
    
    This is a medical decision which puts the Olympic Selection Committee
    on the spot. On the one hand they could put her on the team but the
    injury may affect her skating talent to the point that she may not
    be a world class figure skater any more.
    
    I think it was the best decision that could be made amidst the
    circumstances.
    
    Let's hope she fully recovers...otherwise we'll see some nasty
    repercussions.
    
    M
    
    
155.16PTOVAX::JACOBGO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 18:348
    
    >>What a tragedy. They oughtta let Nancy skate on this guy's face
    >>fer punishment if they catch up with it
    
    OR, let her do the Mrs. Bobbitt thang to him with a skate while she's
    wearing it.
    
    JaKe
155.17MSE1::FRANCUSNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Fri Jan 07 1994 18:487
    I seem to recall that for the 1992 Winter Olympics once of the figure
    skating spots was given to someone who could not compete in the US
    Championships because of injury. I believe it was one of the 3 spots
    for the Men's single.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.18KALI::MORGANFri Jan 07 1994 18:526
    That was the kid from the Cape.  Can't remember his name.  Because the
    US did so poorly in last year's world championships, only 2 skaters for
    the men and women will be allowed in this year's Olympics, if it hasn't
    been stated already.
    
    					Steve
155.19SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesFri Jan 07 1994 18:548
	This will be a tough call for the US Olympic committee. I believe
the rule is, if you won a medal the the previous World Championship.
You can be granted a spot if you can not compete in the Qualifying do
to injury. Does anybody know what Nancy did in the Worlds? I seem to
remember 4th. In the '92 Olympics she won a bronze medal.

Ron
155.20DECWET::METZGERSleep deprivation is a good thing...Fri Jan 07 1994 19:345
5th place in the worlds...tough break...It sounds like he whanged her with a
tire iron or a pipe from our news reports...

Metz
155.21MSE1::FRANCUSNY Mets/NY Jets, both TRULY SUCK!!!!Sat Jan 08 1994 22:218
    The US Skating Federation has a rule in its by-laws that it can
    consider for selection skaters who did not compete in the national
    chamiponships. 
    
    Todd Eldredge got the 3rd spot for the 1992 Olympics.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.22Righr on...SALEM::STIGMon Jan 10 1994 11:583
    Nancy has been chosen to skate for this years US Olympic team.
    
                      stig
155.23CNTROL::CHILDSDan Reeves mental midgetMon Jan 10 1994 12:046
>>    Nancy has been chosen to skate for this years US Olympic team.
    
  for all the right rea$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$on$$$$$$$$$$$

 mikey
155.24USCTR1::KINGMon Jan 10 1994 14:426
    I guess I'm one of the few that thinks she (Nancy) should not have been
    placed on the team. She should have earned her way on like everyone
    else. The skating committee should have eated to see if NK recovered
    and judged her...
    
    REK
155.25hahahaha....SALEM::STIGMon Jan 10 1994 15:173
    eated??? C'mon Rick...what is it lunch time???
    
                         stig
155.26She isn't in yet....SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesMon Jan 10 1994 16:008
	As a Bronze medalist in the '92 games and the defending National
champion. Her credentials are good enough to get her on the team. She
will be evaluated by a 5 member Olympic committee panel on Feb. 3rd. If
she is not ready by Feb 3rd, the alternate will go. So she is not an
autmatic entry as of yet

Ron
155.27USCTR1::KINGWed Jan 12 1994 16:319
    You heard (read) it here first....
    
    Today, at 4:00 pm Detriot Police will announce that Tanya Harding's
    Husband and her bodyguard will be charged with the attack on Nancy
    Kerrigan....
    
    REK
    
    
155.28VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDWhitewater/WhitewashWed Jan 12 1994 16:425
    	I predict that the ratings for this year's Olympic Women's Figure
    Skating will soar through the roof!  Man this stuff is better than the
    Bobbit trial!
    
    				/Don
155.29Soccer and figure skating, my secret passions...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 16:4418
>    Today, at 4:00 pm Detriot Police will announce that Tanya Harding's
>    Husband and her bodyguard will be charged with the attack on Nancy
>    Kerrigan....
    
    You know, when I first heard about this incident, damned if the 
    thought didn't briefly cross my mind that the attack could have been 
    calculated by someone close to a competitor and damned if that 
    person wasn't Harding's boyfriend/husband.  Not that I thought 
    that it was a likelihood or even a possibility, but the guy was 
    well-known for prior violent criminal activity.  I don't follow 
    this skating stuff much but it was well-publicized around the time 
    of the last Olympics that this psycho was beating the crap out of 
    Harding and had restraining orders and whatnot out against him.  
    Apparently there must have been a "reconciliation"...
    
    glenn
    
155.30I know it was one of them...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Jan 12 1994 16:467
    That funny when I first saw this at my In-Laws I said I'll bet money
    its another competator that wants her out of the picture, I wonder if
    tanya knew of if the bone heid husband was sick of his wife being 2nd
    fiddle and set it up on his own.  Either way how good will Tanya and
    Nancy work as a team ..???
    
    								Mab
155.31Bobbitt, this is starting to look like Stuart caseAKOCOA::BREENWed Jan 12 1994 16:571
    
155.32CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 17:1416
>    Either way how good will Tanya and
>    Nancy work as a team ..???
    
There's no teamwork involved.  Each skater is out for his/her own good.

It's like luge.  two or three single lugers get to go, each hoping to 
be the best.

If I'm the #1 luger, and I'm in second place to the USA's #3 luger, I'm 
still gonna hump my butt down that run as quick as I can.

The only teammwork involved is to look nice marching into the opening
ceremonies....


'Saw
155.33Next Bud Light Commercial?MPGS::MCCARTHYMike McCarthy SHR3-2/W1 237-2468Wed Jan 12 1994 17:147
    Figure Skating
    
    Rescue 911
    
    Let's watch both!
    
    Mike
155.34CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 17:1516
>    Figure Skating
>    
>    Rescue 911
>    
>    Let's watch both!
    


Only if we can have two remote controls, a satellite dish to get the
Spanish soaps for afterwards, and a refrigerator in the living room
stocked with beer.

Oh yeah, the pizza place has to be on the speed dialer too....


'Saw
155.35WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MMark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces.Wed Jan 12 1994 17:306
    
    
        John Goodman is a riot!
    
    
    Chap[py
155.37CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 17:457
>    
>      That went zooming right over your head, 'Saw.
>

I guess it did....

Funny part is, it's still up there....
155.39MKFSA::LONG7 more months and he's all yoursWed Jan 12 1994 17:504
<static>"Ah, Propbutt 5-7-niner, you are cleared to begin your approach
	 on runway 2-7."<static>

<static>"Duh....huh?"
155.40METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 12 1994 17:523
do the police also claim that Harding knew about this?

The Crazy Met
155.42CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Jan 12 1994 18:0515
>     'Saw, he's talking about the Miller Lite commercials where the
>    guy(s) want to watch one thing and the girl(s) want to watch another
>    so they put a Lite beer on top of the tv and the two events merge.
>    I thought Mike's comment was pretty funny but it loses something if
>    you have to have it explained to you.

I guess it had to catch you just right.  I knew there was something
I'd missed, but I couldn't figure it out....

Duh, I get in now though.....8^)


'Saw


155.43This was breaking news as of 8:30 AM...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 12 1994 18:1712
>    It's all just idle speculation right now, TCM. Ridiculous idle
>    speculation at that.
    
    Not really.  I don't think REK made that bulletin up.  As of this
    morning on the news I heard that the FBI had witnesses who heard or
    overheard these two setting this thing up.  That doesn't mean the
    witness couldn't be lying and that they're guilty but this thing has
    advanced beyond the stages of mere wild speculation...
    
    glenn
    
155.44vewy interestingCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Jan 12 1994 21:4412
    The Portland Oregonian broke the story about the Harding connection.
    What's the scoop out in Seattle, boys?
    
    BTW, that "witness" is reportedly a minister! Let's hope for his
    sake that he's not a televangelist or he'll have zero credibility.
    
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
    
155.45Wil-da-beast actually...DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 12 1994 22:2211
didn't hear anything about it here...of course I sit in my little cube isolated
from the world all day also...

What I do know is that Tonya Harding is a beast and I'd really have a tough
time giving her higher marks than Kerrigan even if Nancy was skating from a
wheelchair...Witt vs. Kerrigan is  the only matchup  that will satisfy the
skating fanatical audience that the networks are trying to please.....


Metz
155.46GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsWed Jan 12 1994 23:012
    I heard the minister had an unlisted number... wot's wit dat?
    
155.47CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementThu Jan 13 1994 00:5612
                       <<< Note 155.27 by USCTR1::KING >>>

>    You heard (read) it here first....
>    
>    Today, at 4:00 pm Detriot Police will announce that Tanya Harding's
>    Husband and her bodyguard will be charged with the attack on Nancy
>    Kerrigan....
    
Better dust off that crystal ball, REK...it's almost 10:00 an still no 
    press conference.
    
    Mark.
155.48MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 04:377
    Latest twist is that Harding's husband had her bodyguard hire a
    profeesional hitman from Arizona (letsee MikeH take credit for this
    guy :-) to hurt Kerrigan. No indication that Tonya Harding has any
    knowledg of any of this. Bizarre!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.49unbelievable...SALEM::STIGThu Jan 13 1994 09:564
    The report with the minister was that he overheard Hardings husband
    talking about either killing Nancy or injuring her.
    
                     stig
155.50USCTR1::KINGThu Jan 13 1994 11:3512
    Lufy... so I'm a little early than most people... What can I say..
    
    REK
    
    Some more rumors... Tonya will not be charged with anything... She will
    compete in Lilhammer...Nancy will absolve Harding of being a part of
    the "hit".. Nany will NOT win the gold and people will say the "hit"
    is the reason. Harding will finish about 12th and blame the "hit" as
    the reason why she could not focus on her skating... There will be 9
    movies made from all this mess...
    
    Tonight's Mass cash numbers will be  4 16 26 33 42... :-}
155.51Skategate part 1ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Jan 13 1994 11:527
    
    Why are the feds involved ? Are they looking to get an indictment under
    some federal stature ? Things sure are heating up in 'Skategate'.
    
    Will they give style points for the trial ?
    
    Wondering why he didn't do the job right and use a Koho.....
155.52CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 13 1994 11:5933
>    Why are the feds involved ? Are they looking to get an indictment under
>    some federal stature ? Things sure are heating up in 'Skategate'.
    
Probably because the alleged "hit man", allegedly is from Arizona, travelled
to Portland to discuss the "hit" with Harding's bodyguard, travelled to
Boston to carry out the hit, missed Kerrigan there, and then travelled to
Detroit.   Crossed state lines it becomes a federal matter.

What I heard on the news just recently was this:

	Harding's husband talked with the bodyguard about getting
	someone to get Kerrigan out of the way.  Supposedly at one
	point someone suggested killing her but they decided just to
	hit her in the leg.

	The bodyguard taped the conversation (musta been a Nixon disciple)
	and contacted the hit man.  He later played the tape for a minister
	friend of his.  The minister contacted PI Gary Crowe to tell him
	what he knew.

	(I don't understand why the minister went to the PI and not the
	police except that he is friends with Crowe).

	Crowe contact the police.

	I've heard arrest is imminent and that Harding herself, while
	disavowing any knowledge, will be charged....


that was what I heard on the ride in....


'Saw
155.53GWEN::ASHEDetriot(tm) Lions: 1993 NFC Cent. ChampsThu Jan 13 1994 12:0510
    Paramount's already trying to work on something...
    What do you think:
    
    Kerrigan - Phoebe Cates?  The daughter on Roseanne?  Amy Bannerman?
    Harding - Torey Spelling? Alyssa Milano?  Six from Blossom?
    Bodyguard - Jason Alexander?  Dennis Franz?  Ed O'Neill?
    Husband - Luke Perry? David Faustino?
    Paul Wylie - Neal Patrick Harris?
    Mom - Florence Henderson?
    Dad - Bill Kirkenbauer?
155.54the buttofouco's????SALEM::STIGThu Jan 13 1994 12:227
    no matter what happens all the people involved are going to make money.
    Thats why this incident happened. It's a shame that criminals may end
    up getting a profit out of incidents like this. Broadway can make
    anyone famous whether your a criminal or not...
    
    
                stig
155.55Addlebrained interview with Crowe last nightAKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 13 1994 12:3517
    Quickly,
    	Crowe was on Andleman last night; I adjudged his purpose as getting
    the Reverend's side of the story into the press and media before a
    complete gag order is in effect.  Crowe stated that the rev. is already
    under a gag order.
    	The Rev. is 24; Andelman failed to ask Crowe what the relationship
    was between the Rev. and the bodyguard other than that they knew each
    other.
    	Finally a tape was surreptitiously made of the "hit" meeting, not
    necessarily by bodyguard.
    
    	Conclusion btw on reverend is that he had knowledge of impending
    attack prior.
    
    	Andelman in his own inimitable way made a complete hash of
    interview and missed all the salient points.  This is only one of many
    illustrations of how stupid Eddie is; but successful.
155.56ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Jan 13 1994 12:4327
    
    As far as I can see it was a simple assault, a misdemeaner and conspiracy
    to commit an assault. Does this require the feds ? I don't want to
    sound un-PC or anything but this is getting out of hand. Legally as I see
    it (I'm not a lawyer and don't pretend to be one) there are a few
    criminal charges and some civil ones pending. (NK will be able to sue
    her attackers for lost revenue, i would assume) 
    
    So what happens to her attackers ? Probably a 6 month jail sentence and
    a fine. BFD. Here we have the FEDS, Detriot PD, and the Oregon PD
    working on this made for T.V. movie. The three people involved will
    turn against each other so only two will be tried. I figure one will
    rat on the other two for immunity. (Bodyguard) The other two will plea
    bargain to some lesser charge. Next up are the movie/book/tv rights for
    sale, and everyone involved will make some cash. If I were the Judge I
    would award all financial gains form these deals to NK, or impose a no
    profit rule. (Ya, right)
    
    What a country, commit a minor crime and make millions off it, and get
    you local/state/federal police forces in on it so there's your tax
    dollars at work. I doubt they had anything better to do anyway, right?
    (Police)
    
    Twisted, real effin twisted.
    
    
            
155.58CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 13 1994 12:5419
>    As far as I can see it was a simple assault, a misdemeaner and conspiracy
>    to commit an assault. Does this require the feds ? I don't want to
>    sound un-PC or anything but this is getting out of hand. Legally as I see
>    it (I'm not a lawyer and don't pretend to be one) there are a few
>    criminal charges and some civil ones pending. (NK will be able to sue
>    her attackers for lost revenue, i would assume) 

I think the point is that it was a conspiracy that crossed state lines,
and that makes it federal.  (Kind of like the old days when post offices
could be in general stores -- hit the general store for $10 in an armed
robbery, and it became a federal rap).


But I'm no expert.....I don't even play one on TV....


'Saw    


155.59What does the FBI do, then?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 13 1994 13:1715
                                       
    Only simple assault and just a misdemeanor?  I don't know about that.
    You've supposedly got a tape where someone brings up, in seriousness, 
    the possibility of *killing* Kerrigan.  Whether the conspirators 
    ultimately decided to go through with that or not, they then hire
    someone to execute the plan.  I don't equate that with someone taking 
    a swing at someone else in a spontaneous moment.  This story will no
    doubt be overexposed to the hilt but this is the kind of thing I'd
    expect the FBI to be involved with.  For starters, before they got
    these leads, they didn't know what kind of a psychopath they were
    dealing with.  When you're dealing with celebrity stalkers it could
    turn out to be someone who eventually takes a crack at the president...
    
    glenn
    
155.60FRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 13:465
>    profeesional hitman from Arizona (letsee MikeH take credit for this
>    guy :-) to hurt Kerrigan. No indication that Tonya Harding has any
    
    probably Mexican Mafia, kind of like the Italian group you have in NYC,
    Craze.
155.61more as I hear itFRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 13:481
    I know the AZ FBI folks are involved in the mess.  
155.62Phoebe's shining moment was Fast Times @ Ridgemont HighFRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 13:509
>    Kerrigan - Phoebe Cates?  The daughter on Roseanne?  Amy Bannerman?
>    Harding - Torey Spelling? Alyssa Milano?  Six from Blossom?
>    Bodyguard - Jason Alexander?  Dennis Franz?  Ed O'Neill?
>    Husband - Luke Perry? David Faustino?
>    Paul Wylie - Neal Patrick Harris?
>    Mom - Florence Henderson?
>    Dad - Bill Kirkenbauer?

    Walt you need to get out more.
155.64CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Jan 13 1994 13:576
    
    
    Nah, Bam Bam Bigelow should play the bodyguard and James Olmos the
    husband.
    
    
155.65wow imagine thatFRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 14:186
>    I think you're wrong again, Archie Bunker. The name of the hitman, as
>    it's being reported in Boston, is Shane Stant. That doesn't sound like
>    Mexican Mafia to me. 
    
    Well George Jefferson, I have a novel idea for you:  you don't have to 
    be Mexican to join!
155.66ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Jan 13 1994 14:245
    
    What specific laws have been broken ? If you or I where smacked in an
    airport would the feds help out ? The whole thing stinks, and the media 
    are the typical hungry wolves. I switched on the news and the reporter
    was describing that they sent out for pizza. My god, What's next ?  
155.68okay ButtheadFRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 14:281
    >  "Italian group that you have in New York"? Let go of your hangups, Beavis.
155.69METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 14:4014
re: Feds

Feds are in based on a racketerring law passed in the 1930's as well
as the crossing state lines deal. 

Laws: assault with a dangerous weapon
      conspiracy

That is just a start. The first being a felony.

You may hate all the hype, news reports, etc. but there is a legal
basis for the Feds to be involved.

The Crazy Met
155.70Separating the media hype from law enforcement issue...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 13 1994 14:4122
>    What specific laws have been broken ? If you or I where smacked in an
>    airport would the feds help out ? The whole thing stinks, and the media 
>    are the typical hungry wolves. I switched on the news and the reporter
>    was describing that they sent out for pizza. My god, What's next ?  
    
    I don't care what the media and then the moviemakers do.  They're
    idiots, but they're not on the public dole.  Do you doubt that a 
    felony has occurred, when several people plot an interstate
    conspiracy to maim a person, and then successfully execute the plan 
    with an assault with a weapon?  It falls short of attempted murder 
    and conspiracy to commit murder but it's got to be the next level 
    below, felonious assault and conspiracy and certainly not misdemeanor
    assault.  I just can't be *that* cynical about government to say that 
    federal law enforcement shouldn't be involved in bringing such nuts to 
    justice before they actually kill someone (and yes, I'd feel the same 
    way if some nut went to such lengths across the country to assault you 
    in the airport, as implausible as that might be).  Otherwise, there's
    not much point in having an FBI, except to clean up after the fact...
    
    glenn
    
155.71ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Jan 13 1994 14:414
    
     >  "Italian group that you have in New York"? 
    Get your facts straight,  ain't Italian, it's the Sicilian boys 
    your trying to name. I guess that makes me involved then...
155.72Maybe some of these other things were "hits" tooAKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 13 1994 14:478
    The big question now is  Was Stephie Graf or someone close to her
    involved in the Monica Seles stabbing?   Does this incident make the
    odds go up that MS was a "hit".  I'd say its 50-50.
    
    And, Michael Jordan's father's death is now 30-70 that it was connected
    to MJs unsavory non-NBA life.
    
    Because "Crazy" is now commonplace.
155.73WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MMark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces.Thu Jan 13 1994 14:4911
    
    
    
      Back to the Made for TV movie.
    
       Brian Denehey (sp) and Richard Crenna could play the lead FBI men.
    Shannon Doherty could be Harding (with a wig?)
    
    
    
    Chappy
155.74METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 14:506
> Because "Crazy" is now commonplace.


hey I resent that :-)

The Crazy Met
155.75another twistFRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 14:505
>    And, Michael Jordan's father's death is now 30-70 that it was connected
>    to MJs unsavory non-NBA life.
    
    I hear the 2 accused of killing James Jordan are now claiming he was
    already dead when they found him.
155.76PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 14:559
155.77PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 15:0012
155.78media stock...SALEM::STIGThu Jan 13 1994 15:1010
    I couln't believe channel five did a news report on Nancy across from
    her house. Mike Dowling was out in the snow and said that the Kerruigan
    household was waiting in the house and trying to live a normal type of
    life away from everyone. Yet,the media continues to hang around the
    house. They saw Nancy left the house one time during the day..Sometimes
    I wonder who the real "stalkers" are...
    
    what about John Candy as the "bodyguard"...
    
                    stig
155.79VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDPatriot Games?Thu Jan 13 1994 15:265
    	I think one can safely state that the Bobbits, the Branch Davidians
    and the Mega(Sissy)Plex have dropped below the Nancy Kerrigan Assault
    in the Feeding Frenzy department.
    
    				/Don
155.81GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Jan 13 1994 15:3721
         Hypothetically, let's say that Tonya Harding's husband and body
    guard are indicted for various crimes, but that Harding herself is not.
    She would then remain eligible to compete in the Olympic Games as the
    reigning U.S. Champion.  Imagine if you will the negative crowd
    reaction and the the attendant media circus that will follow her every
    move for the next month, leading up to the competition in Lillehammer?
    I do not believe there is any possible way that she could be focused
    enough to compete against the best the world.
    
         The picture is almost as glum for Nancy Kerrigan.  First she has
    to overcome the injury she suffered in Detroit, and the downtime away
    from the practice ice.  Then once she recovers enough to resume
    training, she has to put up with clowns in the media, camped outside
    her home and rifling through her discarded pizza boxes, trying to
    determine if she orders double cheese or not.  She too will have a very
    difficult time trying to regain her competitive edge in time for
    Lillehammer.  If I her were her I'd immediately assemble her entourage
    and disappear to some small town in Europe for the next month!
    
    Russ
        
155.82CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 13 1994 15:444
So now that our figure skating hopes are shot, we can concentrate
on the REAL reason I'm interested in the Winter Olympics, 

Bobsledding......
155.83PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 15:4523
155.84FRETZ::HEISERit ain't meThu Jan 13 1994 15:552
    It's really Isiah Thomas that hit a female figure-skater and ran away
    in Detroit.
155.85ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Jan 13 1994 16:0524
    
    Wait until she (NK) goes to the olympics. If I think it's overblown now
    when (IF) she medals  it will equal a cure for aids in the
    sports/media world. 
    
    Can't wait.
    
    Give me Luge,Hockey,Bobbsledding, skiing and the xcountry shooting
    matches anyday. Figureskating is the last thing to watch.(IMO) So what
    we'll get is 90% figureskating, up close and pesonal with how tough it
    is, 10% on the rest of the olympics. Only stuffed in between the
    reports of NK going to the bathroom and what type anti-persperant she put
    on today.
    
    Sad thing is, I would like to hear about the athelete that struggled to
    make his/her sport while working and keeping a family together.
    Qualifies, competes against the worlds best and comes home. Boring, but
    I thought that was what the 'pics where all about, not some warped plot
    of a deranged group morons who need to have the s#it beat out of them
    and tossed in jail for 5 years or so. The did it because they thought
    they could get away with it, even if caught they probably know that
    it's a win-win situation. 
    
    Sad but we'll here this until mid sumer.
155.86METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 16:116
'Saw

Is bobsleeding the sport the US team has achance to medalin for the
first time in decades?? Or is it luge?

The Crazy Met
155.87PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 16:1918
155.88METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 16:225
Some of the less glamarous sports - Luge, Bobsledding come to mind - were
given very little funding until the last 8-10 years. In the 1960-1970's
there were likely a lot of self-funded atheletes.

The Crazy Met
155.89PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 16:245
155.90ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Jan 13 1994 16:2810
    
    Some of the lesser sports had almost no funding and it was left up to
    the athelete to get it through fund raisers and drives. Now we have pro
    football players doing bobsled and such. Ptooie. The biggies will
    always have the cash, the more obscure sports don't or should I say
    didn't.
    
    Maybe I am letting it get to me, but WTF it's everywhere I turn.  
    
    
155.91Only Thing Missing are the 2 brothers who killer there parentsMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Jan 13 1994 16:3325
    Ok Bosnia, well after hearing how much we spent on the Iraq war, and
    then how much money we gave to Russia Im a little sick of this contry
    sending its troops and spend Mucho $$$ On everywere else except here in
    america.
    
    The Killer from Western MA, here's a guy who admits guilt, draws a map
    and then would have shown them were the body(s) were but a lawyer steps
    in and tells him to NO COMMENT, this lawyer should be shot, what about
    the poor parents of the kids that dont know for sure...
    
    The President, All politics are crooks and guilty, enough said...
    
    Nancy, An olymipic GOld Medailist Hopefule, from MA is attacked more
    then likly from a competator's husband/bodyguard.... Id say its worthy
    of the news, I bought the paper today to read about this and only this
    and then checked out the sports page.. 
    
    If the president is a crook, it will be coverd up, with a lawyer
    involved the Mass Murderer is INSANE and will plead that way, Bobbit
    the guy was an animal, does he deserve to be dismember'd proberbly not
    and Bosnia, if we can screw it up spend millions and do little help,
    thats what will
    happen........................................................................
    
    								MaB
155.92The Kerrigan story is tough to ignore, but in general...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 13 1994 16:3417
                           
    Not only is Shaughnessy's column overblown but I think it's insincere.
    I think basically he was told he had to write on this very important
    topic of compelling interest and probably like most sports guys didn't 
    want to, so he gave it the old half-hearted "isn't that horrible, how 
    shocking" treatment.  A weak effort...
    
    The Bobbitt coverage is much worse, though, imo.  I really thought this
    would die very shortly after it got any mention at all.  The reason
    this case has received any notice is very superficial if you think 
    about it.  I'm kind of surprised that this act or something close to it
    hasn't happened many many times before given the general moral 
    deprivation and violence in this country, and maybe it has but it took
    a certain sequence of reporting events to set it off. 
    
    glenn
      
155.93CSC32::M_MACGREGORThu Jan 13 1994 16:555
    
    Would someone please send me mail when this current conversation is
    over and we get back to the Winter Olympics.  Thank you.
    
    Marc
155.94Slasher goes HollywoodCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Thu Jan 13 1994 17:241
The role of the bodyguard is MADE for Don Robichaud...
155.95METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 17:295
re: .94

nah, you need to find a cynic that /er can play.

The Crazy Met
155.96Insert....CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Jan 13 1994 17:337
>>nah, you need to find a cynic that /er can play.
  
     Er, the "Tommy Brydie Story"??
    
    MikeL
    
155.97The plot thickens...MYMUSE::MASHIAEvery lil' thing gonna be all rightThu Jan 13 1994 17:445
    Just heard on the radio driving  in that Tonya Harding will be
    arrested, along with her ex-, bodyguard, and two others - on conspiracy
    charges.  Apparently she was in it from the gitgo.
    
    Rodney
155.98METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 17:577
so does she now get stripped of the title? does Kwan go instead of her?

If Harding was in on it from the beginning sh is too stupid to go anywhere!
She was basically guaranteed a #1 or #2 finish which meant sh was going to
the Olympics.

The Crazy Met
155.99PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 18:124
155.100heard on the radion thised morning...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Thu Jan 13 1994 18:263
The "US Olympic Code Of Conduct" prohibits athletes under indicment from being 
on the 'lympic team.

155.101CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Jan 13 1994 18:3317
Bobsledding is the event that we have a chance to medal in.

Due to efforts by Geoff Bodine and a chassis shop in Oxford Ct (why
does the name Chassis Dynamics come to mind) the USA now has an
entire fleet of "Made in the USA" bobsleds.

They're fast, and they're quiet.  The Europeans call them "stealth"
because you can't hear them coming -- seriously.

IBM is heavily involved, donating computer equipment, from PS/2 systems
to laptops, which can plug right into the sleds and dowload telemetry
from the runs.

A high tech operation, definitely....


'Saw
155.102METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 18:395
and if the new bobsleds really work then the governing body will probably
pass some rules to make them illegal - it is not all that far fetched;
just look at the IAAF.

The Crazy Met
155.103METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 18:414
If the US has a chance to medal, you can bet that CBS will provide heavy
doses of it.

The Crazy Met
155.104PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 18:462
    Is bobsledding really a sport?  Afterall, it's the earth's gravity and
    the bobsled design engineers that do the work.
155.105METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 18:476
Mac,

do you want me to forward your question - not this note, but the question
contained in it - to JD??

The Crazy Met
155.106MTWAIN::BURROWSRacers Ready...3,..2,..1,..Thu Jan 13 1994 18:5013
    'Saw,
    
    It is interesting that the new bobsleds are quiet.  I grew up in upstate
    NY not too far from Lake Placid, and I can tell you that the older
    sleds made a real racket, something you don't expect at first.
    
    I suspect you have been there to watch them slide?  It is one of those
    sports which is phenomenal when witnessed in person; much better than
    on TV.  Of course, in my opinion, no sport is as spectacular "live", while 
    being as dull on TV, as ski jumping... you gotta see that live to
    believe it!
    
    Clark               
155.107CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Thu Jan 13 1994 18:513
Ain't nobody gonna sled over me this winter...

=Bob=
155.108PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jan 13 1994 18:535
155.109Looks like that Soviet Skater has the Gold WREATH::SCOPAThu Jan 13 1994 18:534
    So we're looking at a cripple and a convict to go for the gold at
    Sledgehammer...erh Lillihammer....what a country.
    
    Maj
155.111METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 19:107
> Are the guys in the sled going to be allowed to chew tobaccy
> or will that effect the track conditions?


as long as they don't spit it out on the track.

The Crazy Met
155.112PTOVAX::JACOBThu Jan 13 1994 19:146
    They'd have a new condition, Brown Ice.
    
    Yuck
    
    JaKe
    
155.113ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Jan 13 1994 19:2216
    
    NASCAR guys doing the chassis ? all I can say is it's about time a good
    ol merican sled was designed. I hope they do well and medal. 
    
    I have never seen a Bobsled race live. Sounds like it would be a great
    event to see in person. Have to put that on the list of must see before
    I croak!
    
    
    
    Back to figure skating, maybe it's my inner self that dispises them so
    much, they only ruin the ice for the real sport that was made to be
    played on ice....hockey.8*)
    
    Will IBM's name be on the sled under the flag ?
    
155.114Nothing is too crazy any moreAKOCOA::BREENThu Jan 13 1994 19:3910
    Mac,
    	My point was that specualtion eg Michael Jordan and dad,Seles.. is
    normally dismissed a la the "grassy knoll" response.
    
    	But this time the wierdest possible speculation proved correct. 
    But I guess I am reaching a little.
    
    	But if I could get a bet down on either spec. at good odds I'd take
    it.
    
155.115GWEN::ASHENo one here 'cept us chickens...Thu Jan 13 1994 20:1515
>>               <<< Note 155.62 by FRETZ::HEISER "it ain't me" >>>
 >>         -< Phoebe's shining moment was Fast Times @ Ridgemont High >-

>    Kerrigan - Phoebe Cates?  The daughter on Roseanne?  Amy Bannerman?
>    Harding - Torey Spelling? Alyssa Milano?  Six from Blossom?
>    Bodyguard - Jason Alexander?  Dennis Franz?  Ed O'Neill?
>    Husband - Luke Perry? David Faustino?
>    Paul Wylie - Neal Patrick Harris?
>    Mom - Florence Henderson?
>    Dad - Bill Kirkenbauer?

>>    Walt you need to get out more.
    
  I get out a lot, that's why I don't watch enough to know who's current
    and who's not.  Maybe I should be home more....
155.116GWEN::ASHENo one here 'cept us chickens...Thu Jan 13 1994 20:223
    Bobsled ain't as manly as the luge. We might medal there too...
    
    Isiah works out in Auburn Hills, not downtown Detriot(tm).
155.117CELTIK::JACOBThu Jan 13 1994 21:3018
    
>>Bobsledding is the event that we have a chance to medal in.

>>Due to efforts by Geoff Bodine and a chassis shop in Oxford Ct (why
>>does the name Chassis Dynamics come to mind) the USA now has an
>>entire fleet of "Made in the USA" bobsleds.
    
    Hey, being a NASCAR type has been working on these, and we know most
    NASCARites are good ol' boys from the south, does this make the sleds:
    
    
    
    Billy_Bobsleds??????
    
    
    Inquiring mindless and all that stuff
    
    JaKe
155.118DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Thu Jan 13 1994 21:444
tori spelling as Tonya harding...nah...more like one of those American
Gladiator chicks...

Metz
155.119MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Jan 13 1994 22:585
    latest report is that Tonya Harding is not implicated in the attack on
    Kerrigan.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.120CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 11:4212
>    I suspect you have been there to watch them slide?  It is one of those
>    sports which is phenomenal when witnessed in person; much better than
>    on TV.  Of course, in my opinion, no sport is as spectacular "live", while 
>    being as dull on TV, as ski jumping... you gotta see that live to
>    believe it!
    
No, actually, I saw an excellent report on the team on PRIME sports....
They talked with Bodine and then the fellow from Chassis Dynamics.
Then they showed footage of the new sleds.


'Saw
155.121ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 14 1994 11:446
    
    For me Bobsledding and Luge are some of the purist forms of racing.
    Man & machine vs. the track. Minor  errors cost you time and major ones
    could cost you serious injury. Love that edge.
    
    
155.122CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 11:4626
>    Nah, 'Saw is just getting caught up with the NASCAR connection.  Are
>    the guys in the sled going to be allowed to chew tobaccy or will that
>    effect the track conditions?

Hey, laugh while you can Monkey Boy....

It's pretty pathetic that it took Bodine having to put out his own money
to get our team decent equipment when supposedly they have a team and
organization that is supposed to take care of all that.

But it's good that we did.  

And when you think about it, it's a pretty good correlation, since most
of the strides in chassis devlepment in this country are made by NASCAR, and
that engineering applies pretty well to bobsleds.

Further, none of the drivers I know chew tobacco.  The closest one comes
to that is old James Hilton, who chews on his cigars.  Besides, Bodine
is a northern boy from Chemung, NY.    

And on a coincident note, the son of the barber who cuts my hair used to
race against Bodine out in Stafford....but the kid lost a lot...8^)


'Saw

155.123CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 11:4812
>    Will IBM's name be on the sled under the flag ?

The sleds I saw had some really bodacious color schemes, the nicest one
having like a stylized eagel head running around to the nose.

If I'm not mistaken, the IBM logo was very small, on the nose of the 
sled.   The Chassis Dynamics logo is on the side somewhere....


'Saw
    

155.124CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 11:498
>    Bobsled ain't as manly as the luge. We might medal there too...
    
Girl from CT made the women's luge team.

Both sports are pretty dangerous.....


'Saw
155.125Bobsled is gonna be great this year....CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 11:5210
>    Hey, being a NASCAR type has been working on these, and we know most
>    NASCARites are good ol' boys from the south, does this make the sleds:

Bodine is from Chemung, NY, and Chassis Dynamics is from Oxford CT.

Lots of northern boys are into NASCAR now....


'Saw

155.126ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 14 1994 11:527
    
    I wonder why the sleds don't have sponsorship logos showing. The skiers
    do. Must be an IOC rule or some type of regulation. If it were my sled
    I would seek as much sposorship as possable and advertise my sponsors
    logos big, bold and bright. What a golden opportunity to get instant
    name recognition. (Listening Digital marketing ?)
     
155.127CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 11:5310
One final note....

It was interesting that both Bodine and the fellow from Chassis Dynamics
said that the deadlines for this project were incredible.  They said that
when they first got involved, they were not aware of the fact that the
Olympics were going to be staggered, and that their development time would
essentially be cut in half.....


'Saw
155.128CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 12:066
>    name recognition. (Listening Digital marketing ?)
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Hahahaha....

155.129GIAMEM::SCHOTTFri Jan 14 1994 12:299
         Back to SkateGate for a moment, does anyone have the feeling
    that WCVB (Channel 5 - Boston) is a long way out on thin ice and 
    feeling a bit exposed this morning, by prematurely reporting that an
    arrest warrant had been issued on Tonya Harding?  Even Peter Jennings,
    reporting from Moscow made mention of the report "out of Boston".
    The Channel 5 Sports Crew seems to be giving Hard Copy a run for their
    money.
    
    Russ
155.130ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 14 1994 12:315
    
    I heard on CNN as I was walking by the tube in PKO that a well
    respected Boston station has reported the arrest warrants have been
    issued. Well respected ? Double ptooie.
    
155.131For MacMETSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 14 1994 12:3115
TCM -

Bobsledding a sport.  Well, after all, it can be
considered HUMAN POWERED, since it is the initial
push that gets them going.  It's not like they
have an ignition key, an engine, and need gasoline
to make it go - like in Car Racing or MotorCycle Racing.

It's sort of like Bicycling - the sport is extremely
assisted by mechanical means - so it isn't a "pure"
sport - but at least it requires more than the ability
to wear sponser's logos, sweat, and remembering to
press the gas to go, the brake to stop....

JD
155.132For JD: LEFT/RIGHT/LEFT/RIGHT/LEFT/RIGHT/LEFT/RIGHT (etc.)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 14 1994 12:340
155.133For Bob:Lesee you do some LeftRigths with us...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 14 1994 12:410
155.134PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 14 1994 12:443
155.135PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 14 1994 12:479
155.136METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 14 1994 12:497
The DA specifically stated that Harding is not a suspect and not being
charged with anything.

Harding's bodyguard and the driver of the getaway car were arrested in
Portland. 2 other arrests expected today.

The Crazy Met
155.137Tonya Harding's future is doomed regardless of her statusKALI::MORGANFri Jan 14 1994 12:596
    I would think that with the possibility of Harding being removed from
    the Olympic team should she be arrested, they'll make damn sure they
    have a hands down case against her.  I just don't see that happening
    unless either she or her husband implicate her.
    
    					Steve
155.138CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 14 1994 13:0623
    
    Warrants do not necessarily have to be issued. The DA *might* have
    drawn up a sealed arrest warrant for Tonya. Channel 5 might be going
    on some inside sources and the spin is on in Portland. Who knows..
    This is getting weirder. The press is camped out in Stoneham, Mass. as
    well as all over Portland (Harding's house, her stepfathers, rink,
    etc.) and no one has seen Tonya at all for two days. 
    
    Yo Mac, I think you might have something.. Bobsled, luge.. what do
    these people do, give themselves a push, jump on and go Wheeeeeee!
    I cain do that on mah hill...
    
    TH,
    I ain't a fan of figure skating at all but I remember an old quote of
    Derek Sanderson. He said if hockey players were in half as great a
    shape as figure skaters, you'd only need one line, one D and one 10
    minute break in a 60 minute game ( I played hockey extensively so ah
    know what kind of shape hockey players is in). Now I don't know if
    Derek said that while sipping a few at Fathers Too.. 8^)
    
    MikeL
    
    
155.139ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 14 1994 13:2613
    
    Figure skaters are strong, have great stamina and some serious moves. I
    wish I had some. Also mentally tough as well. Besides, I think that the
    female skaters have the nicest glutes on the planet, I would like to
    see a little more skin from those costumes.....I just hate what the do to
    the ice surface.  
    
    The Turk respects the talent of the FS as I do. He may have been
    streching it abit, but some of what he said was true. They have good
    bursts of power and exceptional balance, two musts for any pro NHL'er.
    
    Now if we can just get the Turk in the booth instead of Dick Buttons.
     
155.140TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Fri Jan 14 1994 13:276
I think you're exactly right, Mike.  They procure arrest warrants
ahead of time so that, in case they need it, they don't have to
wake up a judge in the middle o' the night.
Probably not entirely legal but hey, this is the FBI.
dr.a
155.142CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 14 1994 14:0925
    Oh jeez,
    Here we go again with the victim thing again. This maroon is Western
    Mass, the guy who allegedly raped and murdered three young girls,
    is all of a sudden a victim of his evironment because he ws abused as
    a kid. Now po' po' Tonya. Did she get hit with a tire iron?
    
    Now Tonya will be looked upon as a victim of her tough upbringing
    and surrounding herself with idiots. And she condones press releases
    from her fan club members excoriating her competitors and threatening
    press members if they write anything negative about her.
    She may not be guilty of anything but let's not paint her as a victim.
    Christ, Kerrigan gets whacked and Harding's first words "I'm going
    to prove I'm #1." Then when Kerrigan gets named to the team,
    "I'm gonna kick her butt." Classy lady. She surrounds herself with
    lowlifes and she's a victim. You reap what you sow.  She ain't no
    victim, regardless of whether she's culpable or not. I don't think
    anyone cried "Tonya's a victim, too" after she chased some woman last
    year with a baseball bat following a car accident.
    
    Personally, I can't see how she didn't know anything about the
    conspiring of those close to her. But in this country you're supposedly
    innnocent until proven guilty.. but that doesn't make her a victim.
    
    MikeL
     
155.143NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 14 1994 14:1211
    Agreed 100% Tommy.  On the other hand (and this is just hypothetical),
    if Harding knew what was up behind the attack-- even after the fact, in
    which case she is still not guilty-- and then a couple of nights later went 
    out and nailed her program and brazenly told the country how good she is, 
    she's got some of the iciest veins I've ever seen in an athlete.  If
    that were the case I might not be worried how she holds up under the
    pressure of the Olympics...
    
    glenn
    
155.144ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 14 1994 14:435
    
    
    Tonya Harding = Pam Smart, surprised the media hasn't nailed that
    angle... yet.
    
155.145PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jan 14 1994 14:489
>She surrounds herself with
>    lowlifes and she's a victim. You reap what you sow.  
				  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  She may be completely innocent and until proven otherwise I'll give her
  the benefit of the doubt. I hope she skates well in the Olympics.
  But she ain't no victim. The above says it all.

	Keith
155.146MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 14 1994 15:0212
    Usually the DA will not say anything before arrests are made, warrants
    issued, etc. For the DA to come out and say that Harding is not a
    suspect is unusual. As far as I'm concerned it was irresponsible of ABC
    and then WCVB to say that Harding was a suspect unless they had
    irrefutable sources for that.
    
    And yes Harding is also victimized by this whole sordid affair. But
    saying that does not mean that Kerrigan is not a victim. The two are
    not mutually exclusive.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.147LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 14 1994 15:027
>    -< Tonya Harding's future is doomed regardless of her status >-
    
    
    Not really.  I think most FSs get their money from endorsements. 
    Harding would still be able to get some, for THe Club, for instance.
    
    brews
155.148Ooops...CSC32::GAULKEFri Jan 14 1994 15:2514
    
    
    
     With regards to the oh_so_fine_Bodine_Design Bob Sled, the first
    test run in Lillehammer resulted in a crash on Turn 2, about
    6 seconds out of the chute.
    
      The reaction from Geoff Bodine?
    
    
     
       "Holy $hit, you mean there's RIGHT turns in this sport? 
    
       
155.149HAHAHAHAHAHA brews, levity to break the er, ice!CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 14 1994 15:251
    
155.150CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 16:0212
>     
>       "Holy $hit, you mean there's RIGHT turns in this sport? 
>    

Geoff is actually pretty good at right turns.  He won the race at
Sonoma on the road course last season, if I remember correctly.

Course, I can't remember the damn name of the race course.....

'Saw
       

155.151VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDPatriot Games?Fri Jan 14 1994 16:0510
155.153CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 16:396
>   smiling ice queens, that we've always had, anyday. I've always pre-
>   ferred real people to replicants.


"Solyent Green is PEOPLE!  It's PEOPLE!"

155.154DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Fri Jan 14 1994 16:5312
    	RE: 155.152
    
    	Someone told Kent Hrbek he needed to buy a vowel.
    
    	Man, you need to buy some commas, or even a period. I
    	nearly wore out my eyes reading that string. 8-)>
    
    	Harding is toast, regardless. She could win the gold, find
    	the cure for cancer and AIDS, walk on water, and rebuild
    	a Hemi blindfolded and she'd still be toast.
    
    	Scott
155.155CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 14 1994 18:025
155.156MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 14 1994 18:126
    re: .155
    
    Show off!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.157Save yo' obfuscations for the SeminolesCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 14 1994 18:2218
    Poifectly punctuated with hyperbole dat is..
    
    What the hail you talking about? Let's not try to obfuscate
    and confuse things here.
    Whether I like her or not means squat to the "victim" premise.
    
    I scanned an article in USA Today that brought forth the
    "victim" argument in Harding's defense. Bullsugar.
    If she's innocent and has had no idea what her compatriots were up
    to fine.. but she ain't no victim. That's my only point.
    
    So what if she's busted her butt.. you don't think Kerrigan and
    countless others have done the same?
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
155.158Damaging? You bet...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 14 1994 18:3213
    
>    If she's innocent and has had no idea what her compatriots were up
>    to fine.. but she ain't no victim. That's my only point.
    
    I dunno, Mike.  Having the likes of Channel 5 telling the world that
    you're about to be arrested *if* it isn't true and you are in fact 
    completely innocent isn't exactly a great career booster.  As for the 
    other stuff about personalities, I don't see any point in taking sides.  
    Not living up to a phony image is no more commendable than having such 
    a phony image bestowed upon you.
    
    glenn
    
155.160Curiouser and curiouserAKOCOA::BREENFri Jan 14 1994 18:4810
    She is at the point where to salvage anything she needs to make a
    public disavowal of her two ex'es (hubbie & bodyguard).  She needs a
    scriptwriter at this point (Tommy? - you available, Sorenson's busy) to
    pull off the victim thing.
    
    But if she makes the plea and sells it the whole thing may work in her
    favor as it ironically has for Kerrigan.
    
    In fact, Mac if you really want "grassy knoll" theory how about Nancy
    masterminded the whole thing - :-):-) (just broke my rule)
155.161CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 14 1994 18:516
>Au Contre (sp), I re-read the note, and it is perfectly punctuated.

fyi -- au contraire


8^)
155.162VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDPatriot Games?Fri Jan 14 1994 18:524
    	I don't like Harding.  Everytime she smiles it looks like her face
    is going to break.  That alone should warrant an arrest.
    
    				/Don
155.163CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 14 1994 18:5915
    Yabbut glenn,
    If damaging she has legal recourse no?? We're talking two different
    things here; I'm not referncing any "victim" of the outta-control
    fickle tabloid media. Hell if she's innocent, I wish her luck
    and if she wins the gold, you'll see the $$$$ come around. The
    media will do a complete 360 in a NooYawk minute.
    
    I don't want to hear no Alan Aldaesque/Marjorie Clapprood
    weeping for po' Tonya. Ya know like she is a victim of her
    upbringing so she ran with the wrong crowd etc. and look what
    harm they done her. Boohoo. That's what I find deesgustin'.
    
    MikeL
     
    
155.164NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 14 1994 19:2129
    Legal recourse?  She might, but realistically I doubt it'd come to 
    anything.  Implicating someone in such wrongdoing if it isn't true could
    be slander, but I guess you'd have to prove intent.  These are factors 
    external to Harding's control and she could be damaged by them, and
    that part is unfair.  I see your points about factors within her
    control, though.  The group of "wackos" who may have destroyed her 
    life happens to include her husband, which I don't consider to be an 
    irrelevant point.  A person has some responsibility for whom they 
    associate with, and it doesn't get much closer to home than that.
    
  >> Not living up to a phony image is no more commendable than having such 
  >> a phony image bestowed upon you.
   > 
   >  That's one opinion. But it ain't mine.
    
    If, for whatever reason, you believe that Kerrigan is putting on false
    airs to promote this image, then I see your point.  I'm talking merely 
    about being "guilty" of a media image dropped on you simply based on 
    such things as one's looks, etc.  Why rail against something that the
    person has no control over?  Likewise, on the other side, I don't have 
    much respect for someone if they're rebelling against conformity by 
    adopting an equally conformist and superficial "bad boy/girl" image and 
    behaving disrepectfully just to attract attention (like self-promoting 
    idiots in other sports like Brian Bosworth, Jim McMahon, Andre Agassi,
    etc.).  It's all the same to me; phony is phony...
    
    glenn
    
155.165KALI::MORGANFri Jan 14 1994 19:2810
    She's a victim because, win or lose she's doomed, not because of her
    upbringing.  The damage has been done.  The baseball bat story, her
    comments after Kerrigan was "removed" from the competition have already
    given people an opinion about her.  It's an opinion that I don't think
    she's capable of changing given her makeup.  
    
    Of course, I think it's still quite likely that Harding was in on this whole
    thing, but that's beside the point.
    
    					Steve
155.166(8^0*PTOVAX::JACOBFri Jan 14 1994 19:369
    Just heard the TV movie thang on this is going to be haided into
    production in a month or so, and Tonya Harding is gonna be played by
    
    Nell Carter
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.168PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jan 14 1994 20:0323
  I read a few things in the paper that may shed some light on the motivation
  for the crime. Evidently, from various estimates, the winner of the Gold
  medal in figure skating stands to make about $10 million from endorsements,
  appearances etc. Then ya have a couple of losers like Harding's ex-husband
  and bodyguard drooling over this money. Harding tried to dump her ex a
  couple of times and the bodyguard was unemployed until Harding received
  a death threat.(it wouldn't surprise me if the bodyguard made the death 
  threat expecting to get hired). And guess what, after the attack,
  Harding would have even more reason to keep a bodyguard and maybe even 
  give him a raise. I can see those 2 loser's dreaming up some
  crazy scheme to insure they get a piece of the 10 mil. But I still can't
  see a world class athlete athlete who has busted her butt training since 
  she was age 4, trying to knock off the competition in any other way than 
  out skating her.

  Colorado has been a training ground for many world class skaters, especially
  at the Broadmoor World Arena here in Colorado Springs. I number of people
  have called the local radio talk shows and claim they know or have knowledge
  about Harding. Evidently, the time she chased someone with a baseball bat
  is not an isolated incident. There were stories of her getting into fist 
  fights with her coaches. 

	Keith  
155.169PTOVAX::JACOBFri Jan 14 1994 20:0811
    Just in, Nancy Kerrigan's part in the made for TV movie has been cast
    now, also, playing her will be
    
    
    
    Richard Simmons.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.170:^)WREATH::SCOPAFri Jan 14 1994 20:261
    Bring back Peggy Fleming.
155.171DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Fri Jan 14 1994 20:3621
Ya gotta remember the background of most of these skaters compared to
Harding..Most of them come from upper-middle to rich backgrounds....Harding
used to live in a trailer home in her grandparents front yard and used to
collect cans off the side of the road to pay for her skating dresses...

Of course the skating establishment isn't going to like a rough and tumble kid
from across the tracks unless the kid is willing to put on airs in order to fit
in (like the waitress from the last olympics)...Harding wasn't willing to do
that..

However she is responsible for the company she keeps and if her image is
sullied because of her husband and bodyguard ..tough, that's life. I'm sure CBS
had an up  close and personal segment discussing her background and what a
marvel is was for her to rise above it...it appears that story will have to go
on hold...

My guess is that she's disgusted by her husbands lack of faith in her and is
hoping he'll exonerate her from the whole mess.....

Metz
155.172PTOVAX::JACOBFri Jan 14 1994 20:4210
    More on the TV movie casting
    
    to play the bodyguard:
    
    Emmanuel Lewis
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.173CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 14 1994 22:0916
    Metz,
    I know that Harding has had a tough background and I do give her credit
    for her constant attempts to rise above it. She doesn't fit the
    stereotype of the well-off figure skater that the Olympic committee
    supposedly fosters. However, Kerrigan comes from no easy background.
    Her father has scraped and re-mortgaged to finance her efforts ( in
    the past till the endorsements came in). Obviously she came from
    a better background than Harding but she wasn't born with a silver
    spoon in her mouth.
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
    
    
155.174PTOVAX::JACOBFri Jan 14 1994 22:2411
    Another cast member announced
    
    To play Dick Buttons(even though he wasn't there, ya know, artistic
    license) will be
    
    Roseanne Arnold
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.175USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Sat Jan 15 1994 01:243
    Jake.. your jokes are old and really not funny at all...
    
    REK
155.176(8^0*PTOVAX::JACOBSat Jan 15 1994 02:036
    REK DO ME!!!
    
    BTW, you REK are old and not really funny at all.
    
    JaKe
    
155.177Rat on, Tommy!!CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementSat Jan 15 1994 02:232
    
    
155.179(8^)*PTOVAX::JACOBSat Jan 15 1994 03:1515
    
    ANother casting anouncement, cast in the role of the blunt inanimate
    cold object used to whack Kerrigan in the knee is
    
    
    SPROTS own REK....
    
    
    ..how fitting.....
    
         
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.180withdraw or you're gone...SALEM::STIGSat Jan 15 1994 09:455
    i heard on WEEI this morning that if Harding has anything to do with
    this the Olympics committee is going to drop her from the team that is
    if she doesn't withdraw.
    
                         stig
155.181USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Sun Jan 16 1994 02:2911
    Jake Jake Jake.. Pittsburg....  Enought said.....
    
    Lufy.... Leominster.... Enought said....
    
    Get a life BOYS!!!!!!
    
    REK
    
    PS Lufy, nice reply.. first thing you have put it here in a while...
    PSS Jake, don't give up the day job.. Your family would starve if you
    trid to make a living as a comic.... :-}
155.182MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Sun Jan 16 1994 04:065
    re: JaKe - or as a casting agent. heck JaKe would probably fail
    at the casting couch as well.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.183(8^0*PTOVAX::JACOBSun Jan 16 1994 13:445
    Thanks fer the votes of confidence...I'll just consider the sources.
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.184DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Jan 17 1994 11:104
    	Too late now, but 60 Minutes had a segment last night about
    	Tonya Harding. Showed her skating when she was much younger.
    
    	Scott
155.185GWEN::ASHENo one here 'cept us chickens...Mon Jan 17 1994 12:324
    Yeah, talked about how much of a bitch her mom is...
    
    I heard they're casting Amy Fisher as Tonya Harding.
    
155.186FittingANGLIN::WIERSBECKChildsIsWrong-ReevesIsGOD!Mon Jan 17 1994 13:004
    I was thinking the same thing, Walt.
    
    
    Spud
155.187PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 17 1994 13:1416
155.188DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Jan 17 1994 13:416
    	Well, if Gilooly mastermined this thing, what's Tonya doing
    	riding around with the fella? The TV shot the other day showed
    	the two of them driving outa their driveway in a Lincoln, I
    	believe.
    
    	Scott
155.189NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 17 1994 13:4512
    
>    	Well, if Gilooly mastermined this thing, what's Tonya doing
>    	riding around with the fella? The TV shot the other day showed
>    	the two of them driving outa their driveway in a Lincoln, I
>    	believe.
    
    In spite of Mac's heartfelt defense and the general weeping going on in
    here, while not legally married the two have been back together for a
    few years now.  Same thing as marriage as pertains to this case...
    
    glenn
    
155.190theres still hope for her if she wasn't involvedSALEM::STIGTue Jan 18 1994 15:306
    if she knows whats good for her she would leave goolooloo right now!!
    Unless, she has something to do with this thing. Thats the only thing I
    can think of if shes still with him...and..if she leaves him and shes
    not guilty it could possibly save her career...
    
                       stig
155.191The misuse of money may kill herAKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 18 1994 19:515
    The news that money from Olympics and other Amateur sources has gone to
    pay for the hit has to be seriously damaging to her chances and may
    allow finally the Olympic group to deep six her (If for no other reason
    than that money is for Tonya's training expenses and misuse may be
    grounds for dismissmal).
155.192re: .191 - not that simpleMETSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 18 1994 19:5410
US Figure Skating Association can recommend that Harding not be on the team.
Harding can then appeal to the USOC and maybe then to the IOC.
After that she can sue in court. By the time all that is done, the Olympics
may well be over. So if she gets a temporary injunction from a judge she
could very well go.

This is assuming she is not indicted for anything.

The Crazy Met
155.193AKOCOA::BREENTue Jan 18 1994 20:3810
    Tcm,
    	My point was that USOC may not be able to touch her for anything
    related to the hit and the FBI/Police felony charges but may be able to
    make a move because of the misuse of funds, never even mentioning the
    assault.
    	Sort of like sending Al Capone to sing-sing for Income Tax fraud
    when criminal charges were not provable.
    
    	I saw something in glob about usoc having hands tied re. the actual
    crime.
155.194METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Jan 18 1994 20:454
but proving misuse of funds can be really tough especially if she made made
or was given money outside of what the USOC gave her.

The Crazy Met
155.195the clintons...SALEM::STIGWed Jan 19 1994 09:473
    wow!!! this sounds like Whitewater...
    
                   stig
155.196Act III, Scene VKALI::MORGANWed Jan 19 1994 11:295
    Heard on the radio that Harding has distanced herself from Giloolly.
    They're no longer living together, but she still doesn't believe he had
    anything to do with it.
    
    					Steve
155.197she dumps goolooloo???maybe???SALEM::STIGWed Jan 19 1994 12:014
    yup...she says she wants to concentrate on her skating rather than
    goolooloo. This is the best thing that she can do for herself.
    
                        stig
155.198DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Jan 19 1994 12:147
    	On the slide, uh, er, drive in this morning the person inside
    	the radio 8-)> said that TH talked to the FBI for 10 hours
    	yesterday.
    
    	I wonder if that cut into her training?
    
    	Scott
155.199METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 13:333
10 hours! sheesh! what the heck could take that long.

The Crazy Met
155.200VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Wed Jan 19 1994 14:438
    	Hmm...  After talking for 10 hours to the police Tonya decides to
    break all ties with her ex, again.  My guess is if the cops ever pin
    anything on her we'll be subjected to another battered spouse defense.
    Watching Harding stand there silent while her lawyer answers questions
    from the press reminds me of the classic gangster/mouthpiece scenes
    from mob trials past.
    
    				/Don
155.201METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 15:404
/er lots of folks let their lawyers do the talking in thes highly publicized 
cases.

The Crazy Met
155.202PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 19 1994 16:452
    Given that what you say can be used against you in a court of law, I
    can see why they do.
155.203TV movies gonna make a mintCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Jan 19 1994 17:056
    Authorities just issued a warrant for Gillooly's arrest.
    
    4 down, 1 to go??
    
    MikeL
    
155.204theres always something...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedWed Jan 19 1994 17:416
    you think harding snitched on him....she must of told the story and
    nuthing but the story. your right its gonna make a great movie. they'll
    all be running to the bank except those who will be running to the
    slameroo...
    
                   stig
155.205quite the law, eh?DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 19 1994 18:4410
Now I know why they waited until they got all the info before they even talked
to Gilhooley. There is a law in Oregon that says if you bring somebody in for
questioning and he invokes the right to stay silent the only way to get  them
to testify is to  give them immunity...

So instead they got all the info from everybody else  and issued a warrent for 
 gilleygully to make sure that he couldn't get immunity....


Metz
155.206METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 18:486
Metz,

That Oregon law is called the 5th amendment. It applies in every part of
the US.

The Crazy Met
155.207or maybe liter?HBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropWed Jan 19 1994 18:494
It used to be the 5th Amendment. Now, since our metric infusion, it's
called the 750ml Amendment.

TTom
155.208PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 19 1994 18:503
    I think you're confused, TCM.  The 5th amendment doesn't guarantee that
    what you say can get you off, even if you were a party to the crime. 
    The 5th amendment says you have the right to keep your mouth shut.
155.209METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 18:559
Mac, from note .205

> There is a law in Oregon that says if you bring somebody in for
> questioning and he invokes the right to stay silent the only way to get them
> to testify is to  give them immunity...

All this law says is that you can keep your mouth shut. 
Reading comprehension 101 would help, Mac.

155.210DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 19 1994 19:009
No, it's a state law that guarentees immunity if you are required to testify

Perhaps you should take the reading comprehension course TCM. 

When I wrote state law I meant state law. When I wrote guarenteed immunity I
meant guarenteed immunity.

Metz
155.211METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 19:028
Metz, I believe you it is an Oregon law. But ...

When congress wants someone to testify they HAVE to grant them immunity.
That means that a federal law is involved. No state can force a person to 
testify if it will incriminate them. I just don't see where the Oregon law
is different than this.

The Crazy Met
155.212PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 19 1994 19:075
155.213DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 19 1994 19:1010
the AP reported it as a quirk in Oregon state law.

"Officials are hesitant to question him because of a twist in Oregon law. Under
state law a person can invoke his right of silence and, if compelled to give
testimony in a grand jury proceeding, or other investigatory proceeding can
receive immunity"

"We don't want to take that chance of him getting immunity,"Bradley said.

155.214METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Jan 19 1994 19:104
Actually all it does is offer a legal way for the state to compel you
to testify.

The Crazy Met
155.215New levels of ridiculousness are being reachedKALI::MORGANFri Jan 21 1994 11:3911
    You know what pisses me off about this?  I was watching the local news
    last night and they're interviewing Ted Kennedy.  He had spoken to Mrs.
    Kerrigan and she, of course, made it known how much she wanted the
    perpertrator(s) arrested.  So Ted says he made a call to a "high
    ranking" FBI official.  Next thing you know the Director of the FBI
    made a personal call to Mrs. Kerrigan, assuring her they were doing all
    they could.  Now, is this an absolute joke or what?  The girl got
    wacked on the leg with a baton!  It wasn't a gangland style murder or 
    anything.
    
    					Steve
155.216interview???SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Jan 21 1994 12:009
    yeah but they were were thinking murder in the plot. it could of been.
    these guys are little nutty to even do what they did...
    
    ps. did anyone see the interview with i think (diane saywer) and the
    bodyguard last night??? he was telling pretty much everything...
    
    
    
                      stig
155.217ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 21 1994 12:113
    
    HEad of the FBI ? Give me a F(*&^% break. Old Gin face has to get his
    licks in too, when will he go away ?
155.218MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 12:1414
    FBI announced that no Federal charges will be filed.
    
    fwiw the bodyguard's statements are not enough to indict Harding. There
    has to be independent corroboration for his accusations.
    
    Grand jury met yesterday. DA announced that no indictments would be
    handed down until next week.
    
    If Harding is indicted the USOC has some chance of keeping her off the
    team. Legally they will have a battle unless she is convicted and that
    won't happen before the Olympics.
    
    The Crazy met
    
155.219ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 21 1994 12:272
    
    I wonder how much this is costing the taxpayer ? 
155.220CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 12:4811
>    FBI announced that no Federal charges will be filed.

This is significant for Harding.

If it's only state charges, most states have laws against requiring
marital partners to testify against one another.  (are they really
divorced?  that could be significant too).

However, federal charges would recognize no such thing.

'Saw
155.221GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Fri Jan 21 1994 13:342
    Last I heard, they were divorced but living together again.
    
155.222FRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Fri Jan 21 1994 14:163
    Walt, she just kicked him out again this week for appearances sake.
    
    Did I mention that the hitman is from Arizona?
155.223USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Fri Jan 21 1994 14:336
    How come when the swimmer ,Kimball, got SMASHED and KILLED a couple
    of people AND charged with V_H he was allowed to compete in the Olympic
    trails and Harding (if charged) will not be allowed to compete?
    
    
    REK
155.224MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 14:4112
    re: .223
    
    Excellent question! One difference of course is that Kimball was not
    participating in the Olympics. Second difference he did not go out of
    his way to injure a competitor. That aside he was not convicted and
    therefore could particiapate. That is why I would bet that Harding will
    probably be at the Olympics. If she is later convicted they could in
    theory strip her medals and National championship (making Kwan a Nation
    champ at 13!)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.225USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Fri Jan 21 1994 15:257
    So TCM, Its OK to run down and kill a couple of by-standers while drunk
    out of him mind to compete in the Olympic trials but not OK to
    "alledgely" hurt a competetor and be in the Olympics....
    
    Does the Olympic Committee over see the trials?
    
    REK
155.226MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 15:288
    REK
    
    I did not say that. First I pointed out the differences. My conclusion
    is that without a conviction keeping Harding, just liek stopping
    Kimball from competing, is a very very tough call.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.227USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Fri Jan 21 1994 15:353
    Sorry TCM, I tend to not read all the way through...
    
    REK
155.228CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementFri Jan 21 1994 15:359
    What frosted me was while watching the end of Law and Order Wednesday
    night, Channel 7 cut into the ending to show with a news preview of
    Kerrigan getting out of her car.  Cut back to the closing credits of
    L&O.
    
    I'm almost to the point where I hope she goes medal-less in the
    Olympics just to shut the media up.
    
    Mark.
155.229did they say if nancy was picking her nose???SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Jan 21 1994 15:416
    what kind of pizza was she eating this time???
    
    re a couple back...plus Harding would have some nice law suits in hand
    if not indited and getting thrown off the team...
    
    stiggy
155.230VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDReady,Steady,Go!Fri Jan 21 1994 15:506
    	Not surprisingly folks are starting to hate Kerrigan for something
    she has absolutely no control over.  I figure that by the time the
    Olympics start there will be a Tonya Harding cult, similar to the one
    that wants to free Pam Smart.
    
    				/Don
155.231CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 15:5324
To me, all the hype and coverage is almost as annoying as the recent spate
of what I call "weather panic".

You know, when there's a winter storm three days off all the weatherpeople
start getting nervous.  They send trailers across the screen that
say 

	Caution, there is a winter storm which might be big and might
	be bad and there's a chance, kinda sorta that it might be headed
	this way, and by the way, be sure to stay tuned to this station
	for all your storm needs because our Doppler Radar is better than
	anyone else's Doppler Radar even though it comes from the same
	place, and our Anchorwoman's chest looks better in a tight
	sweater than their anchorwoman does, in case you needed to know
	this.

I mean, I'm fed up with all of it.


We're not going to medal at all in the Limp-Ics, and then we're gonna
hear about it all the way to 1998.....

sigh,
'Saw
155.232it really stinks...CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jan 21 1994 16:0028
    She seemed pretty bent on what is "owed to her".  She was focused on
    one thing, how much money she is owed.  

    "...People work and get a pay check every week, I work hard a expect a
    paycheck at the end...".

    I hope she alienates all potential advertisers and endorsements with
    her classless response to this nastiness, regardless of her guilt to
    the action.  A no class, skater who clearly sees only herself, not one
    word of sorrow (even a fake attempt) to Kerrigan, only herself.  
    
    Not only is she one of the most unattractive and disproportioned skater, 
    she is a whiner.  (I think she has a terrible bod, for a figure skater)

    A spokesperson from the US Olympic did state that making the team is
    a **privilege**, and is not owed to anyone.  She also stated that a
    person can be denied acceptance on the team is it is felt they do not
    represent the nation as per some definition set forth by the
    committee...

    The body guard is also a fraud, and liar...  I do believe that Harding
    was an active participant of the "plan".  I use her actions, her mood,
    and her reactions as a basis for my opinion.  

    Should make about seven made-fer-tee-vee movies.

    _GSH_
                                                                   
155.233CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 16:0323
>    I hope she alienates all potential advertisers and endorsements with
>    her classless response to this nastiness, regardless of her guilt to
>    the action.  A no class, skater who clearly sees only herself, not one
>    word of sorrow (even a fake attempt) to Kerrigan, only herself.  

On Imus this morning they had me rolling.  They said that while all 
potential advertisers are heading for the hills where she is concerned
she has just garnered a fat contract being a celebrity spokesperson
for The Club....


>    The body guard is also a fraud, and liar...  I do believe that Harding
>    was an active participant of the "plan".  I use her actions, her mood,
>    and her reactions as a basis for my opinion.  

He's living proof that someone, somewhere, was in the barn and wasn't
just feeding the cows....


>    Should make about seven made-fer-tee-vee movies.

Yeah....8^)                                                                   

155.234MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 16:048
    Globe had a blurb that Kerrigan called in to a cable TV talk show (some
    local Sports call in show) one night. The anchors were kind of stunned
    even after they verified it wasn't a hoax. The delicious part is that
    all those media folks were camped outside her home in the freezing cold
    while this was taking place.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.235I mean 'cow' statement, o' courseCSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jan 21 1994 16:044
    Damn you, 'Saw, I just spit coffee out my nose all over everything with
    that darned "caw" statement!  ;-)
    
    _GSH_
155.236LAGUNA::MAY_BRJWBobbit&amp;DSmith-BothComeUpALittleShortFri Jan 21 1994 16:097
 >   she has just garnered a fat contract being a celebrity spokespersonfor
 >   The Club....
    
    Dammit.  That's the second tie I've seen someone steal the line I put
    in here about a week ago.
    
    brews 
155.237No money, no competePIPE::DODGEFri Jan 21 1994 16:4318
    It looks like the U.S. Figure Skating whatever will let Tonya be named
    to the Olympic Team.  I doubt the US Olympic organization will stop her
    either.  The reason is the threat of a law suit.
    
    I read an article somewhere about some Men's track star who was denied
    a slot on the team for some reason.  He sued, and three years later won
    a judgement for $75M.
    
    If I were on the board I would let her compete, but not provide any
    funding, no expenses, nothing !  I imagine it is very expensive to
    train, travel all over, buy meals, etc.  If the Olympic committee
    and all her sponsors (who could they be ?) cut off the money.....
    she is S.O.L.
    
    Either way she is a loser and will never make any endorsement money.
    She will fade into the woodwork very fast.  Her only possible source
    of money is Hollywood.
    
155.238MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 16:549
    1. Butch Reynlods won a 27M award against the IAAF
    
    2. If Harding is on the Olympic team
      A. The charter likely forbids different treatment for one athelete
      B. Even if A is not true, treatment like .237 suggest would probably
         lead to a law suit.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.239lawsuit alertHBAHBA::HAASParty when you can, rock til you dropFri Jan 21 1994 17:0217
>      A. The charter likely forbids different treatment for one athelete

Not true, due mainly to the fack that each sport has its own way of
choosing its team. Some directly compete in a championship, like figure
skating did. Some have elimination trials. Some are appointed.

And each has its own ways of dealing with adding and subtracting team
members.

>    1. Butch Reynlods won a 27M award against the IAAF

This is where the real rub will happen. If'n they kick Harding off the
team afore she's found guilty of anything, then she'll be pretty much set
for life after the lawsuit.

TTom

155.240CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 17:146
One thing I've heard a couple of folks say on WFAN is that the USOC usually
defers to the US Figure Skating Association when it comes to the skaters,
so they will probably do that in this instance....


'sAw
155.241MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Jan 21 1994 17:168
    Ttom,
    
    what I meant was once an athelete is on the team (after Jan 31) and the
    USOC is completely in charge treating atheletes differently in terms of
    expenses, etc. may be against the charter.
    
    The Crazy met
    
155.242PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 17:165
155.243Fack is...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 21 1994 17:2211
155.244CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 17:279
155.245CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 21 1994 17:296
155.246CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 17:3217
155.2478^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 21 1994 17:377
    Oh MrT would rally to Tonya..
    somehow he'd make the connection to Bob Knight and his beloved
    Hoosiers; unatractive, hardworking misunderstand, overachieving etc..
    
    MikeL
    
    
155.249now that's a shocking revelationFRETZ::HEISERMatthew 5:18Fri Jan 21 1994 17:391
    >    Sorry TCM, I tend to not read all the way through...
155.250CSC32::GAULKEFri Jan 21 1994 18:1218
155.251CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Fri Jan 21 1994 18:3326
    RE:  .242  Oh-oh, PC police on the move...  ;-)

    O.K., let me rephrase so's to soothe any sensitive readers.

    As an Olympian:

    She is a good figure skater.   Period.  She has been mediocre and she's
    been great.  She (or Kerrigan) are certainly not "locks" for a gold.

    As a spokesperson for BRAND X:

    In terms of advertising endorsements, I feel she is a whiner and has
    nothing, regardless of her triumphs on the ice, coming to her in terms
    of big bucks.  I feel she has acted self centered and insensitive to
    the whole Kerrigan affair.  Now, with her hubby (she said a week ago
    the divorce should have never happened) costing her millions, I see 
    no indignation, no anger, certainly no offer of sympathy and condolence
    toward Kerrigan.  A classless bimbette who thinks she's entitled to a
    check.

    AFTER HER PRIME:

    As far as her looks figure in, I wouldn't go watch an ugly ice capade 
    queen.  Peggy Flemming, et al, were never homely...  Go "figure".

    _GSH_
155.252CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 18:457
>    The runner-up in the Kerrigan-less US championships was the 14 year old
>    Kwan girl. She's a little pixie. If we're to go by what you and Saw say
>    then some of the judges must be pedophiles. 

Take a look at Dick Button and tell me that there aren't alot of
weirdos in the world of figure skating.....

155.253CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 18:4723
>  That's gotta be a candidate for Image of the Year Award.
>
>Can you imagina a 400 pounder in one 'a them flying camels, spinning at
>a hunnerd miles an hour, sraying the front 5 rows with oozing puss?
>
> We'd start seeing everybody wearing big ol' plastic bags, kinda
>like what they put on when Gallagher goes into his Sledge-O-Matic
>routine.

Oh man, thank god I wasn't eating a cheeseburger when I read this.

This is TOO funny.

On a serious note, my 7th grade math teachers face was so bad that
when he'd smile they'd pop and coat the bottom edge of his glasses.
I lost weight in 7th grade because that class was right before lunch
and I could never eat.

Plus, he was a Browns fan.....


'Saw

155.254GWEN::ASHEThank you Dr. King.Fri Jan 21 1994 18:532
    Weirdos: See Boitano, Brian.
    
155.255CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 19:006
>
>    Weirdos: See Boitano, Brian.
>    

Or Scott "Gonna Fly Now" Hamilton....

155.257CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 21 1994 19:1723
>      The biggest weirdo is that Bowman the Showman. He looked like 
>     he was on the verge of a nervous breakdown. 

Who is Bowman the Showman?

>As for Dick Button,
>     what qualifies him as a "weirdo"? That he gets overly excited
>     about his favorite sport? Lot of weirdos in here then. Maybe,
>     it's that he sounds a tad effeminate? Let go of your hangups,
>     Beavis. Figure skating doesn't have the market cornered on 
>     strange characters. Ask Lance Rentzel. Or "Mad Dog" Ernie Holmes.

I dunno, he's just weird.  He's got a weird look in his eyes that
scares me.  And now with the beard, I don't know....

I never said figure skating had the market cornered on weirdos,
although I find it a little weird that someone would choose it
over hockey, but there are some weird ones there.....


'Saw


155.258people who have a favorite solstice?PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 21 1994 20:093
155.259rugby players? :*)GENRAL::WADEFri Jan 21 1994 20:231
    
155.260CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Jan 24 1994 11:495
Report on Imus this morning is that Portland, Ore. authorities say they
have enough to charge Tonya Harding.  They are waiting till they get it
air-tight however....

'Saw
155.261ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Wed Jan 26 1994 20:542
     Why are they having the Winter Olympics so soon? Shouldn't they be in
    1996? Is it not every 4 years anymore?
155.262DECWET::METZGERSuper Human? No, Super Sonic....Wed Jan 26 1994 20:567
they decided to stagger them so that summer and winter wouldn't be in the same
year....so they went 2 years inbetween last winter and this one...


Metz
 
155.263HANNAH::ASHESit down, you're rockin' the boatThu Jan 27 1994 11:594
     Right - next summer in '96, next winter after this on is '98.
    
    A radio station in SD wants to change where they are from Harding
    County to... well, you can figure out the rest...
155.264Anyone hear it???SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Jan 28 1994 10:264
    what did everyone think of tonya's state of the union address
    yesterday??? 
    
                   stig
155.265does anybody take this s*ag seriously?AD::HEATHHave pitchers and catchers reported yet?Fri Jan 28 1994 10:394
    
    
    she is still lying
    
155.266Hey - Don't blame me!SUBPAC::WHITEHAIRBILL MUST GO!Fri Jan 28 1994 10:5123
    
    	I really feel sorry for this girl.  Here she has worked since being
    	3 years old to get to this point.  Has been beaten by her mother
    	for not doing good enough.  Got mixed up with this bum and now is 
    	being considered guilty before all the facts are in.  I really
    	hopes she goes to the big event and wins the gold over Nance.  She
    	will probably not get many endorcements but at least she will have
    	had her chance.  
    
    	Now, Nance on the other hand is this woman who's parents have lots 
    	of money and she is making lots more for what?  She hasn't won
    	anything yet but still get all these endorcements.  Go figure.  
    
    	I guess this case goes right along with all the others that have
    	gone backwards.....ie:  Bobbitt...how can this woman get away with
    	what she did.  Do you think it have given anyone ideas?  Then there
    	is the Jackson deal.  You have enough money, do what you want.  Now
    	there are the two boys who kill their parents and say they did it
    	because they were abused.
    	
    	The list can go on and on.....
    
    		hw
155.267WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MMark Matthew Jr. 6lbs 6 ounces.Fri Jan 28 1994 10:549
    
    
    
    
           Anyone notice Bernie looks like Nancy with short hair?
    
    
    
    Chappy
155.268I don't understand...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Jan 28 1994 12:014
    She just made the situation worse. How the heck can her lawyers allow
    her to talk like that...
    
               stig
155.269ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 28 1994 12:2222
    
    NK's parents did not have alot of money until NK started to ring in
    endorsements. She has since started to 'spread the wealth'. In speaking
    with some of the pro shop guys at the local rinks where she used to
    train, it was stated to me that NK's parents bet the fort on her career
    and it is paying off. Remember at the last Olympics ? Who won the gold ?
    It wasn't NK, but a Japanese American named Yamaguchi who got squat for
    endorsments and most people think that NK won it that year. To bad for
    Yamaguchi, but NK had her teeth fixed and now she is cashing in.
    Nothing wrong with that, I hope she makes millions. NK is no shoo in
    for the gold, as Harding is the better skater before this mess began. I
    personally hope that she is innocent (TH) and stomps on NK in the
    'pics. (I doubt Tonya is as pure as snow white, but this is a friggin
    mess and it will detract from other events that I would like to see) 
    
    Besides, Imus had it right when he called NK handsome.
    
    I sure hope the FBI devotes mega manpower to crack this here case. It
    would be a shame if TH gets away with it, but if the Feds want you,
    they will have you.
    
             	
155.270MIMS::ROLLINS_RFri Jan 28 1994 12:2414
>            <<< Note 155.268 by SALEM::STIG "for all have sinned" >>>
>                           -< I don't understand... >-
>
>    She just made the situation worse. How the heck can her lawyers allow
>    her to talk like that...
>    
>               stig

     Apparently she made similar comments to the FBI when she spoke with
     them about 9 days ago (several days after the event).  It appears that
     if she did nothing to plan or cover up the event, and did come forth
     with what she knew afterwards (even though delayed), that she has done
     nothing illegal.  Now whether or not she had nothing to do with it is
     something I care not to speculate about.
155.271This weather sipsCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 28 1994 12:2717
I knew I shouldn't have started readign Hal's notes again.

Kerrigan comes from a blue collar background, same as Harding.  Kerrigan's 
parents had their act together enough to support her in her quest for greatness.
Harding overcame her parents (or actually mother) in hers.  Don't hold it 
against Kerrigan that she came form a positive family background.  

From what I could see, both made extraordinay sacrifice to get where they are, 
and both have dedicated their lives to it.

I dunno what to believe.  Harding seeme straight up when she said that she was
wrong nto to report the incident, but then she planted "friends" to make excuses
for her that she feared abuse if she did.  I can't help but get the gut feeling 
that she is playing to the sympathies of the People-Magazine/Made-For-TV_Movie
crowd in the hopes of still coming through the thing smelling like a rose.

=Bob=
155.272ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 28 1994 12:285
    
    Besides, if they had some real evidence she would have been cuffed by
    now. They are making it airtight so the USFSA doesn't get it's ass
    sued. This is getting good. What happeneds if TH is exonerated ?
    
155.273METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 28 1994 12:4818
> What happeneds if TH is exonerated ?

If she is not allowed to go to the Olympics and that happens the USOC will
be paying her millions.

Donna DeVerona (sp?) of ABC said that with the due process requirements that
the Skating Federation and the USOC have it would be very difficult to
have a hearing and resolve the issue before the Olympics.

Gilooly spent 11 hours with the DA and FBI yesterday. If they still haven't
cut him a deal then he must not be able to give them enough on Harding; if
that is the case and she really only knew about the plot after the fact
she should be alloed to go to the Olympics.

Kerrigan could really become the media darling by asking the USOC to allow
Harding to compete - imagine the tons of money that would bring.

The Crazy Met
155.274I no longer have faith in our justice systemFRETZ::HEISERmy kid beat up your honor studentFri Jan 28 1994 12:522
    There is no justice today.  There are only lawyers who are better
    salespersons than others.  Look at the current Mike Tyson proposal.
155.275CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 28 1994 12:5521
The sad part is that this has overshadowed almost every other
aspect of the Olympics.  The bobsled team has been doing really
well, our hockey team has been working their asses off (down
in Middletown CT, btw) and I'm sure there are some real
competitors out there who have been all but forgotten because
of this.  

(And it's not like the Olympics is going to be any great rating
grabber either).

Now, wouldn't it make you all have thigh shuddering pleasure if
it came out that CBS pulled an NBC Dateline, and paid Gilloooooly
et al to do this, in an effort to get a ton of media attention
focused on this?

(What do you think /Don?  Is it possible?)

I'd have to get a BIG roll of Bounty if that was the case....


'Saw
155.276METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 28 1994 13:009
What is the laste Tyson proposal?

back to the Olympics: Especially if Harding does go and she and Kerrigan
are competing for the Gold in the free skate CBS may very well get the
highest rating for a Winter Olympic ever! One exception may be the tape
of the US win over the Soviets in 1980 - this competition will also
be taped. Imagine the ratings if it was live in the US in prime time!

The Crazy Met
155.278Rathole 101ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 28 1994 13:1919
    
    Justice ? Ptooie. Off the subject a little, F*&^ the court system, it's
    worthless. Laywers, sure they share some of the blame, but the whole
    thing rots. The reason the did this  crime is because they felt they
    could get away with it and make some cash. Thats the problem, GET AWAY
    WITH IT. Not me, I'm not responsable. It was my youth, I was abused, A
    little rabbit told me to kill, WTF I had my truck stolen last year and
    they caught the little punks from Southie that did it. Some real nice
    white trash, that didn't deserve to be locked up, they deserved an old
    fashioned beating. I mean they were caught for cripes sake and let go.
    No restitution, no nothing, I even testified twice. I pity the fool who
    thinks he can cause property damage to me again and gets caught. Faith,
    nope, justice, even worse. You want something done, do it yourself.
    
    Sad thing is until restitution is made and jail time served as a result
    of your actions, forget it. It's a nice circle jerk that manifests
    itself.
    
    
155.27938346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 28 1994 13:253
    What I find really scary are the comments to the effect that since
    Harding is not considered visually pleasing she must be guilty.  One of
    the Boston DJs is spewing stuff like this.
155.280FRETZ::HEISERmy kid beat up your honor studentFri Jan 28 1994 13:3712
    Re: Tyson
    
    Yeah Don King must need the spending money.  He wants Mike out fighting
    again.
    
    Re: Tonya
    
    She is a 2-bagger, but I've sensed she was involved from the start. 
    You just get a gut-feeling about certain things.  Sometimes those
    gut-feelings betray you, most of the time they don't.  I'd be shocked
    if she truly wasn't involved.  And her statement to the press yesterday
    seemed to do more damage than good.
155.282CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 28 1994 14:013
I don't think Tonya's that bad...  Certainly better than Hillary.

=Bob=
155.283Harding's a VERY powerful skater/gymnast.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 28 1994 14:184
    Agreed =Bob=.  Compared to Hillary, Tonya looks like Vanna White.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
155.284Vanna White -yeccchhhhh!!!CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Jan 28 1994 14:330
155.285PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jan 28 1994 14:5819
>    Justice ? Ptooie. Off the subject a little, F*&^ the court system, it's
>    worthless. Laywers, sure they share some of the blame, but the whole
>    thing rots. The reason the did this  crime is because they felt they
>    could get away with it and make some cash. Thats the problem, GET AWAY
>    WITH IT. 

  Truer words were never spoken. Recently, I just went through a 2 1/2 year
  ordeal of a police investigation and court appearances for a couple of
  dirt bags who robbed us. You won't believe the scumbags that are turned
  loose by out Legal system(note: I did not say justice system). After it was 
  all over, the detective told us about a punk he arrested for 26 burglaries
  worth about $90,000. After he got a 13 year sentence, the detective 
  interviewed him and he was devastated. He told the detective that he was
  caught 5 times for burglary as a juvenile and was let go every time. He
  said he didn't think anything would be done if he was caught.

  Yep, the message that the legal system sends out is that crime pays.

	Keith
155.286They'll be rolling in $$ from TV/book/movies etcCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Jan 28 1994 15:225
    Bottom line to all this hooey; it's all being set up, she don't
    go, she sue.. it's the American way.
    
    MikeL
    
155.287USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Fri Jan 28 1994 15:396
    Hey WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   Hillary-Babe pust both of those skaters
    on thin ice when it comes to a beauty contest!!!!
    
    REK
    
    PS TH mom really helped TH cause lasted night with Connie Chung....
155.288Hilary = 1lb of spamKIRKTN::DWALLACEThe Lure 'O the troutFri Jan 28 1994 16:011
    
155.289ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 28 1994 16:062
    
    Besides, I like TH's initials.8*)
155.290REK's excuse: the dog made me do it :-)METSNY::francusMets in '94Fri Jan 28 1994 16:393
what did TH's mom say to Connie Chung?

The Crazy Met
155.291SPENT,SPENT,SPENT.....CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Jan 28 1994 17:225
REK, I'm *really* starting to worry about you....

Have you had your eyes examined recently?

'Saw
155.292ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Jan 28 1994 17:285
    
    Hillary a babe ? WOuldn't take her to a rock fight. Bleeechhh.
    
    Any chance on team USA medaling in Hockey ?
    
155.293SALEM::DODAStand and deliverFri Jan 28 1994 18:119
  <<< Note 155.287 by USCTR1::KING "Cemeteries = Parks with nice stones..." >>>

  >  Hey WATCH IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   Hillary-Babe pust both of those skaters
  >  on thin ice when it comes to a beauty contest!!!!
   
   Not really, she just appears to be attractive when she parks 
   her butt between Shalala and Reno.

   daryll
155.294CSC32::M_MACGREGORFri Jan 28 1994 18:317
    
    I think the USA hockey team has a decent chance at medaling.  Would
    have been a lot better if two players had not decided to stay with NHL
    contracts instead...
    
    Marc
    
155.295PTOVAX::JACOBprisoners here of our own deviceFri Jan 28 1994 18:568
    
 >> Yep, the message that the legal system sends out is that crime pays.
    
    Damned right crime pays, look at what we pay
    Congressmen/Senators/politicians!!!
    
    JaKe
    
155.296PTOVAX::JACOBprisoners here of our own deviceFri Jan 28 1994 18:569
    
>>REK, I'm *really* starting to worry about you....

>>Have you had your eyes examined recently?
    
    Saw, methinks he needs his HEAD examined more than his eyes.....
    
    JaKe
    
155.297hohohohoho....SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedSat Jan 29 1994 08:593
    or maybe REK is getting old and seeenile...
    
                   stig
155.298TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Mon Jan 31 1994 18:5011
It seems Mr. Gilooly is pleading guilty to some
sort of racketeering charge in return for a lighter 
sentence.  These guys are singin' their li'l heads off, huh?

Also, a desk clerk in Detriot(TM) is claiming that TH
asked for (and received) NK's hotel room number before
the assault.

It's intrusive and tawdry.
It's fun.
dr.a
155.299METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballTue Feb 01 1994 18:504
Gillooly was supposed to have a news conference at 2:30 EST. Any word
on what was said?

The Crazy Met
155.300CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 01 1994 18:5813
>Gillooly was supposed to have a news conference at 2:30 EST. Any word
>on what was said?


	You gonna eat that?

Oops, wrong joke....


8^)



155.301PTOVAX::JACOBThurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!!Tue Feb 01 1994 18:5914
    Anybody see the tape fo the Austrian skier that was killed over the
    weekend????
    
    I just missed it but the paper here ran a few pics from the tape. 
    Seems she hit a timing device, lost her helmet, broke her neck and died
    shortly after being airlifted off the course.
    
    Other skiers were said to be blasting whoever was running the race,
    saying they used chemicals on the course to keep the snow form emlting,
    and it made the course extremely icy and dangerous.  The skier, whose
    name escapes me at this time, is survived by a 3 year old child.  
    
    JaKe
    
155.302PTOVAX::JACOBThurman Thomas= NFL's Barry Bonds!!!Tue Feb 01 1994 19:0010
    
>Gillooly was supposed to have a news conference at 2:30 EST. Any word
>on what was said?
    
    He plea bargained, got 2 years in the slammer and a $100k fine, and
    will testify against Harding.  He implicated her when doing his thang
    in front of the judge.
    
    JaKe
    
155.303mo' input - mo' inputCSTEAM::FARLEYTue Feb 01 1994 19:058
    
    
    	Yabbut doesn't Oregon law have some weird clause that doesn't
    allow Gillooly to "implicate" her or some such twist?
    
    deen to wonk (tm)
    Kev
    
155.304METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballTue Feb 01 1994 19:1810
he may have given enough evidence that the police can now independently
verify.

If .302 has it right, it would appear that
Kwan will be in the Olympics and Bobeck will go as the alternate.
And Harding should be sent away for stooopidity. The odds that she would not
have gotten at least 2nd place at the US Nationals, assuming she didn't 
crash and burn, were incredibly small.

The Crazy Met
155.305I'll take this bastion until another comes alongAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billTue Feb 01 1994 19:2610
    TCM,
    	Heard on Imus this morning that Nike has kicked in 25k to pay for
    her defense
    	And Nancy K has signed with Reebok for an ad to be aired during
    Olympics
    	Just as Budweiser puts in a lot of money defending young America's
    right to swill (oops) drink beer we see other bastion's of freedom
    defending Tonya's right to make money for advertisers
    
    	And isn't Imus doing a lot of repeats these days
155.30638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 01 1994 19:275
155.307stick a fork in herFRETZ::HEISERgimme a dollar or gimme 50 centsTue Feb 01 1994 19:303
    His lawyer is fielding questions at the conference.  Sounds like they
    have lots of evidence, and even have her only 2 possible defenses taken
    care of: home along excuse, and the abuse alibi.
155.308Usually, alas, in that orderAKOCOA::BREENA hot-rod Ford and a two dollar billTue Feb 01 1994 19:3611
    Mac,
    	I consider < 35 still prime of life.
    
    	And Bud etal know that oceans of their beer are consumed by < 21
    
    35 is generally when the biggest decisions are made such as
    
    
    
    	What beer to stick with (and perhaps what gal too)
    
155.309I still say, let her compete...KALI::MORGANTue Feb 01 1994 19:3711
    Does anyone else think that the two (Harding and Gillooly) are up to it
    again, by giving the cops just enough dirt for them to indict her, thus
    opening the door for the USOC to boot her off the team?  This would
    allow them to sue the collective asses off the USOC ala Butch Reynolds.
    Reynolds tested positive for something illegal, yet still won a $27
    million lawsuit.  She could stand to reap more money via a lawsuit, than 
    she would if she were to stay on the team.
    
    Then lo and behold, the two would reconcile once again.
    
    					Steve
155.310bunch a idjuts...DECWET::METZGER17 days...Tue Feb 01 1994 19:429
I'm still amazed that this group of people with a collective IQ of about 12
thought that they could get away with this. I guess it's because their
collective IQ is 12 that they thought they could

The oregon law is that they need independent confirmation of anything that
conspirators say trying to implicate each other...

Metz
155.311The gang that couldn't shoot straightMETSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballTue Feb 01 1994 19:4513
The 25K that Nike was donating was on the news last night.

re .309: if she is eventually not convicted of anything then the USOC could 
be in deep trouble if they kick her off the team. A problem with your 
hypothesis is that it would take too much intelligence too cook this plot 
up and so far these folks have rivaled Beavis & Butthead in sheer incompetence 
and stupidity.

If she is not convicted (which she won't be by the Olympics) the USOC's best
bet is to let her compete and then strip any medals she might win if she
is convicted.

The Crazy Met
155.312FRETZ::HEISERgimme a dollar or gimme 50 centsTue Feb 01 1994 20:299
>    Reynolds tested positive for something illegal, yet still won a $27
>    million lawsuit.  She could stand to reap more money via a lawsuit, than 
    
    that's currently in the court of appeals, but he should still get a
    major chunk of that $27M.
    
    I can't believe they were dumb enough to attack Kerrigan at the rink. 
    Obviously, it takes someone with credentials to get down to the tunnel.
    They could've hired some junkie to do it and blame it on Detroit crime.
155.313Reynolds a very different caseMETSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballTue Feb 01 1994 20:367
Reynolds claimed that the whole process leading to the test was so flawed
that there was no way to figure out if it was his sample that was tested
or someone elses. Most of the places he appealed to, before getting to
the IAAF, agreed with him. After the IAAF refused to let him back he
sued in the courts and they also agreed with him.

The Crazy Met
155.314PTOVAX::JACOBTue Feb 01 1994 21:446
    heerd that Gilooly's part in convicting TH will just be one piece of
    the puzzle.  Evidently they gots lots more dirt on TH linking her to
    masterminding this thang than just ol Jeffy boy's testimony.
    
    JaKe
    
155.315NikeNikeNikeNike..HAHAHAHAHA and I'm Ish KabibleCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Feb 01 1994 23:1211
    Yup,
    I really believed Nike's president when he said that in America
    a person is innocent until proven guilty and he felt morally
    bound to donate the caish to her defense. Yup.
    
    And everytime someone mentions this mess, someone else will
    mention how altruitic and morally superior those Nikeites are.
    Yup.
    
    MikeL
    
155.316Don't think they'll use this in the WWoS introCAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementWed Feb 02 1994 01:508
    re: the skiing mishap...
    
    Save for perhaps Theisman's knee injury or Herb Score getting domed off
    of McDougal's liner back to the mound, the most disturbing video
    footage I've ever seen. A real tragedy as she left a 4 year old
    daughter.
    
    Mark.
155.317USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Wed Feb 02 1994 11:1814
        If TH is officially charged with conspiracy and all that other stuff
    then would she be allowed to leave the country after she makes bail?
    I thought that part of the bail guidelines that you were not allowed to
    leave the country....

    The Skier that died. As a former Ski instructor, Ski Racer and ski
    patrol I feel I can speak a little on this subject. The tape is not
    clear enough for officials to see where she hit her head. The woman
    downhillers have been complaining for years the the DH courses were
    not tough enough or challenging. Infact, the women got the Olympic
    downhill moved to the mens course. DH is a dangerous sport and the tape
    we all saw shows why..

    REK
155.318CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 11:3918
>        If TH is officially charged with conspiracy and all that other stuff
>    then would she be allowed to leave the country after she makes bail?
>    I thought that part of the bail guidelines that you were not allowed to
>    leave the country....

A lawyer in WFAN yesterday said that is pretty much up to the judge.
She's hardly a flight risk -- as Howie Rose said (was it Howie on with
Susan Waldman yesterday afternoon?) "what's she gonna do, seek asylum
in Lillehammer?"

It's possible that she could be allowed to leave the country and compete.

Lots was made of the fact that the onus is now squarely on the USOC to
make a decision, and in a sense they're damned if they do, damned if they
don't......


'Saw
155.319Slimball of the year award goes to...AIMHI::KERRLivin Life By The DropWed Feb 02 1994 11:4516
    
    a few back.
    
    I believe Nike is donating to her defense because they are out of
    Beaverton, Oregon (next town over from Portland) and that it is at a
    rink in Beaverton that TH did most of her early training.  I think they
    gave the money because of the local affliation, not because they were
    trying to appear altruistic.  Besides, someone's got to give her some
    support, the desire to nail her is so great that I don't believe she
    can get a fair shake (and, IMHO, Gilooloo is such a slimball that his
    implicating her for a reduced sentence doesn't mean a whole lot).
    By the way, I thought Gilooloo's lawyer was way out of line at that
    press conference, he was acting like prosecutor, judge, jury, and the
    USOC, what ever happened to due-process?
    
    
155.320didn't they have a sort of tournament then?CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Feb 02 1994 11:4617
    
    
    	Yabbut mark my word, this will be mentioned sometime during the
    games!
    
    	Apparently in some small town about 60 miles from the 'Pic game
    site, there really is some lady named Lilly Hammer.  According to an
    unnammed source (I know who but I won't say who), Lilly is planning on
    hosting her own Lilly Hammer Olympics.
    
    That's about it
    
    I remain,
    waiting for the Lilliputten games - I'll fit right in. Right Gulliver?
    ;^)
    Kev
    
155.321ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Wed Feb 02 1994 12:2614
    
    Re the downhill tragedy.
    
    Now that the courses are challenging enough a little twist is added and
    that is a greater risk for injury/death. If in fact it was a problem
    with the course then it should be dealt with. If not shut up or put up.
    Being involved in racing it gives you a different outlook when
    something like this happens, and 98% of the time it is due to
    driver/racer error. 
    
    She knew the risks of the sport and payed the ultimate price, but all
    competitors know this once they are on the starting grid.
    
    
155.322CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Feb 02 1994 12:288
    What Nike says publicly and what my interpretation of their real
    intent are opposite polls. Nike did this for business reasons even
    though it's only 25K which in itself is fine; don't add the
    hypocrital moralistic hooey. 
    
    JMHO
    MikeL
    
155.32338346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 02 1994 13:066
155.324DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Feb 02 1994 13:128
    	I think the skater was Ulrica Maier, or something close to
    	that.
    
    	One of the newscasts here said it was a Super G race, not
    	downhill. That seemed incorrect, given the speed she was
    	traveling down the slope.
    
    	Scott
155.325METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballWed Feb 02 1994 14:445
From one of the news stations last night: A bigwig in the ABA Defense
Attorney division basically said that as a defense attorney Gilooly's
lawyer should know that what he said was completely unacceptable.

The Crazy Met
155.326CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 14:5115
>From one of the news stations last night: A bigwig in the ABA Defense
>Attorney division basically said that as a defense attorney Gilooly's
>lawyer should know that what he said was completely unacceptable.

He knew full well that what he said was unacceptable, but I'd be
my paycheck that he was simply trying to sway public opinion.

Even if you figure you're of average intelligence, that means that half
the people are dumber than you, so you know that a bunch of people probably
took what he said at face value.....

That's my cut at it.....


'Saw
155.327METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballWed Feb 02 1994 14:533
Sure he was trying to sway public opinion. so what!

The Crazy Met
155.328CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 02 1994 15:389
>Sure he was trying to sway public opinion. so what!

Oh.

NO big deal.  I was just responding to the fact that it seems some
folks couldn't get over the fact that a lawyer would do something like
ignore due process etc etc in his comments.

I mean, the guy's a LAWYER -- that should say it all 8^)
155.329PTOVAX::JACOBWed Feb 02 1994 18:5512
    RE skier,
    
    I heerd she was only doing 60 when the mishap occured(I cain't imagine
    doing 60mph  with nothing between me and the earth but a set of
    skies)but that the course was not in the world's most skiable
    condition, partly because of the chemicals they used on the snow.
    
    The skier's child's father has pledged to sue the organizers of the
    event.
    
    JaKe
    
155.330Downhills are cool. I've crashed and burned on a few in my day...DECWET::METZGER16 days...Wed Feb 02 1994 19:2515
It's common practice to salt a course down if the weather is warm. This makes
the course firmer.  It's even done in my recreational racing league toward the
end of the season.

The racer always has the option of not running the race if they feel it's
unsafe. There have been boycotts in the past when a group decides that a course
isn't safe for racing and more often than not the officials relent.

Yes, it's a tragedy. Yes, I feel sorry for her child. However the only reason
they have for a lawsuit is either equipment failure or they are taking issue of
where the timing stand was placed. 

Metz  
who wanted to go skiing today but was fogged in at home....
155.331VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDI'mGoingToDisneyWorld/DisneyLand!!Thu Feb 03 1994 15:4722
	I have the real story in this Tonya Harding mess.  First, CBS hired 
Shawn Eckhart to mastermind this whole thing.  CBS knew it was going to 
take a beating in the Winter Olympics and needed to drum up interest for 
the February SnoozeFest.  Eckhart convinced Gillooly and Harding that since 
Tonya was such a beast to Nancy Kerrigan's beauty she would never stand a 
chance in a "sport" like figure skating.  Once convinced Eckhart was right, 
Harding and Gillooly plotted to take out Kerrigan.  The irony is that 
Kerrigan knew of the impending attack (she played out the victim role 
convincingly, although the "why me" shriek was a bit much) and was promised 
mucho endorsement dollars if she went along.

	Of course CBS really didn't want Kerrigan hurt (or Harding arrested 
for that matter) so they needed somebody simple enough to be the willing 
pawn.  Enter a stupid bodybuilder, the perfect foil.  The real club was 
actually in the grassy knoll while the one used on Kerrigan was rubber.  
Much as CBS had hoped, this story has grabbed considerable national 
attention and when Harding is allowed to skate in the Olympics she and 
Nancy will be seeded #1 and #2.  The rest of the skaters might as well go 
see the Norwegian sights (if there are any), because CBS will not be 
denied the WWF good versus bad skateoff in their Olympics.

				/Don
155.33238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 03 1994 15:577
155.333CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 03 1994 15:577
You forgot the part about the Space Aliens /Don, and about Chuck Connors
and the Marine.

You're slipping.......


'Saw
155.334re: .332 - you looking for logic in /er's note?? ha!METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballThu Feb 03 1994 16:0014
great chronology of the way this attack was bungled.

Stant flew to Boston. Went to rent a car and discovered he forgot
his credit card. Checked into the hotel at Logan under his own name.
His credit card arrived by mail after 2 days. He then rented a car
and drove out to a motel near Stoneham. Got there, checked in under
his own name and discovered that Kerrigan had already left for Detroit.
Returned the car, went to take Amtrak to Detroit and missed the train.
Eventually got to Detroit by bus. Had trouble getting a rental car
in Detroit because his credit card was over its limit. Checked in to
a motel under his own name. Carried out the attack. Checked out of the
motel, and only on the flight back to Portland used an alias.

The Crazy Met
155.335CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Thu Feb 03 1994 16:005
I heard this morning that Nancy Kerrigan stands to earn about $10 mil
in commercial endorsements as a result of her increased popularity
due to the assault.

Jerry
155.336METSNY::francusReeves, Slasher &amp; girly-mon footballThu Feb 03 1994 16:024
and the millions that are being talked about are whether or not she
wins the Gold medal. A Gold medal multiplies that figure.

The Crazy Met
155.337CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 03 1994 16:181
Wouldn't it be a pissah if they were both in it together?
155.338VAXMKT::ROBICHAUDI'mGoingToDisneyWorld/DisneyLand!!Thu Feb 03 1994 17:077
155.33938346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 03 1994 17:147
155.340CAM3::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 03 1994 17:3211
Didja ever notice that Nancy gets this kind of 

	"doe-dee-doe-dee-doe, dum-dee-dum-dee-dum"

look on her face a lot?  Kind of like someone who's clueless?

I just noticed that last night on the news.  My guess is that she's not
going to be building any rockets in the near future.....


'Saw
155.342wierd stuffFRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Thu Feb 03 1994 18:103
    Did anyone hear that they may re-open the case of Harding's murdered
    brother?  Seems he was involved in a hit-and-run accident soon after
    Tonya told Gilooloo that he was abusing her.
155.343soap opera...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedFri Feb 04 1994 00:461
    please!!! will the real hit-man please stand up???
155.344As The Blade TurnsAIMHI::KERRLivin Life By The DropFri Feb 04 1994 11:498
    Gawd!  What a great soap opera this is.  Last night on the news I heard
    Kerrigan's mother state that Nancy would really enjoy following
    all of this if it wasn't about her.  It's fun until you're in the
    middle of it (although, as already mentioned, NK will pocket some major
    cash for her troubles).  I bet Tonya wishes she was watching instead of
    participating.
    
    
155.345Rule #1 on why figure skating is not a "sport"DECWET::METZGER14 days...Fri Feb 04 1994 17:1716
FBI has confirmed that Harding made the calls to find out where Kerrigan
practiced. Also She was IDed by a hotel worker as the person trying to get
Kerrigan's room number. Plus she has been caught in several lies about her
story.

Did  anybody else read SI this week and the little blurb on figure skating
judges. Quite humerous IMO. In the 1988 Olympics the only change from the
initial seedings of the ice dancers was a swap  of 14th and 15th place...
Six of the judges were suspended (and later re-instated) for predetermining the
standings.

Why bother having the competition if the outcome is predetermined?


Metz
155.346CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 04 1994 17:199
Fred Imus, Don's brother, said that when Warren Moon came back from
having injured ribs, lots of lineman aimed for his ribs when tackling
him, trying to get him back out of the game.

He said that now that figure skating has that element it could become
a real sport.....8^)


'Saw
155.347Not that differentANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Fri Feb 04 1994 17:2611
    I was thinking about this the other day.  You go back to when the
    Giants were purposely going after MacMahon with intent to injure. 
    That's true of many situations in football and hockey.  Somehow though,
    it falls in the context of the game and seems forbidden from outside
    law on assault.  If someone went up to another person on the street and
    whacked them with a hockey stick, they'd get arrested - provided they
    were caught and prosecuted.  Yet in the sports arena it's deemed ok, at
    least there isn't anything done about it in most cases.
    
    
    Spud
155.348Full contact figure skating?CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Fri Feb 04 1994 17:444
Maybe we ought to start a movement to make figure skating a contact
sport.  Hell, there's probably even a Miller Lite commercial in this.

Jerry
155.349CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 04 1994 17:4842
>    I was thinking about this the other day.  You go back to when the
>    Giants were purposely going after MacMahon with intent to injure. 

Well, Spud, let's not single that one out.   8^)

There's a novel written by a DL from the Falcons, and a buddy of mine
in here read it.  He was telling me that one of the major premises
of the book is that every hit in football is made with the intent
to cause as much pain and injury as possible.



>    That's true of many situations in football and hockey.  Somehow though,
>    it falls in the context of the game and seems forbidden from outside
>    law on assault.  If someone went up to another person on the street and

I think it exists in other sports too.  You want to let the guy know
you're there.  

How often have you been playing ball and had an infielder not fielding
the ball standing in the basepath and how many times have you gone around
him?  How many times have you gone over him to send a message?

Pete Rose hitting any catcher at the plate was designed to send a
message -- and perhaps make them flinch the next time.


It is strange that as long as those things are done in the context of The
Game society doesn't frown on it.  

I suppose you could make a case that humans are by nature agressive animals
and that our games have replaces the hunter/killer urges that we sometimes
have -- violence in a controlled atmosphere is okay, whereas out on the
street, unchecked, it isn't.....


T'is the stuff that theses are made of.....


'Saw


155.35038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 04 1994 18:158
155.351CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 04 1994 18:3835
>    Try telling that to the NHL, MLB (remember the big outcry of
>    basebrawl?), the NBA (look at the stiffer fighting penalties.

And try taking that away from the fans and see how far it gets.

Nobody give a shit about fighting in hoops because the Linda Evans vs
Joan Collins fights in Dynasty were closer to real fighting than the
hissy-fit slapfests those genetic mutants have in hoops.

Baseball had problems because the incidents rose sharply in a short
period of time, plus all those millionaires got to be really nancy-boys
who couldn't take the heat inside.

Hockey should continue to have fighting.  Period.

    
>    Not too long ago a Boston mayor (Flynn?) threatened to send cops onto
>    the ice to arrest NHL goons.

Yeah, he threatened.  And do you know what would have happened had he
carried through with it?   They couldn't have poured enough cops into the
Garden quick enough to quell the riot.


There was a very interesting Time Machine episode about a month ago that
dealt with the gladatorial games of Ancient Rome.  What was interesting
is that after 2000 years, folks still wanna see blood and gore, but they're
less open about wanting to see it.  

Human beings have a natural curiousity about death and stuff like that,
and it can't be totally repressed....


'Saw

155.352GENRAL::WADEFri Feb 04 1994 20:368
    
    re.  Basketball hissy-fit slapfights
    
    	I'll betcha Rudy Tomjanovich would argue with that!  :*)
    
    	He of the caved in face........
    
    Claybone
155.353DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Feb 07 1994 11:479
    	Claybone,
    
    	Who hit Rudy T? I wanna say Kermit Washington. That punch
    	was no slap (in the face). 'Course, it didn't help that
    	Rudy T was running toward/past KW when the punch was
    	thrown. Lots of momentum. It's a wonder KW didn't break
    	his hand or wrist.
    
    	Scott
155.354CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopMon Feb 07 1994 11:551
yup it was Kermit Washington
155.355SALEM::DODAStand and deliverTue Feb 08 1994 13:336
When did the FBI become a private dick for the USFSA?

Since when does the FBI "share" files on an ongoing 
investigation with a private group?

daryll
155.356METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Tue Feb 08 1994 15:335
did the FBI do that? I thought the USFSA folks were going to go to
Portland. When the authorities told 'em that they would not be given 
any non-public information they cancelled their trip.

The Crazy Met
155.357should this be in the Boxing note instead? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Feb 08 1994 16:5115
    
    
    	Yabbut no mention that the IOC has put Tonya and Nancy together for
    practive times??????
    
    	What a bone head move (or was it CBS's decision? Naw, couldn't be).
    
    Do ya think CBS would get any calls from the soap box tee vee crowd
    if'n they pre-empted "as the woild turnsn" to show the practice
    sessions?
    
    I remain,
    absolutely convinced I'll not watch
    Kev
    
155.358SALEM::DODAStand and deliverTue Feb 08 1994 17:042
According to the press conference they held Saturday, they had 
been going over the files the FBI had on the case.
155.359CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 08 1994 17:4116
>    
>    	Yabbut no mention that the IOC has put Tonya and Nancy together for
>    practive times??????
    
Jeff Greenfield, on Imus this morning said that Tonya should show up with
a rifle -- then just say she's on the biathalon team.  That would be 
funny.

From all the news I've been hearing though, the funniest part of this whole
thing is that Kerrigan, who's going to get a massive sympathy vote for her
po' po' knee, is not even favored to win gold.  Nor is Harding.  These two
ladies could definitely finish in 5th and 6th place, and this would all
be for naught.  And would I laugh.

I'd laugh even harder if Kerrigan was in on the whole thing too.....8^)

155.360METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Tue Feb 08 1994 17:427
yabbut, won't Carol be controlling the remote??

ISU (International Skating Union??) has skaters from the same country
practice at the same time. They claim they only want a media circus at
one practice session not at 2. Nonetheless, a bonehead decision.

The Crazy Met
155.361METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Tue Feb 08 1994 17:435
re: .359

yabbut Kerrigan would still get endorsements.

The Crazy Met
155.362Let it go; everything will be okay shortly...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 08 1994 18:0516
             
> yabbut Kerrigan would still get endorsements.
    
    This fact just keeps coming back to bug the hell out of people, huh?
    Who cares?  So far I've seen a couple of Campbell's soup commercials,
    and if the past is any guide after the Olympics we'll see a few
    commercials for about three weeks and then Kerrigan and the rest of the
    skaters will forever disappear into their niche markets.  It doesn't 
    begin to approach the mainstream hype of athletes from pro hoops/
    football/baseball...
    
    This saga sure is receiving a lot of attention from people who claim
    they don't care... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
155.364CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 08 1994 18:4813
It could be as bad as the Mary Lou Retton gag-fest we had
back then....

I mean, I think if I saw that Super Charged commercial one 
more time, I'd have taken a rifle myself and hunted her down....8^)


This whole thing is pretty funny.  I bet Kerrigan was involved, and
after doing some jail time Harding will get a "split" of the
endorsement profits....  Yeah, that's the ticket....


'Saw
155.365METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Tue Feb 08 1994 18:496
re: .362

Glenn, I actually wasn't  complaining. Just stating a fact.
Far as I'm concerned if she can rake in the bucks, good for her.

The Crazy Met
155.366and again tomorrow AM....CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Feb 08 1994 19:0616
    
    
    	Yabbut since I listen to the radion a lot at home, ya just can't
    escape from a lot of this.
    
    	Anyway, I heard the day before yesterday that NK has been signed by
    at least 3 major sponsors.  The only $$$ figure I remember was $450K
    but I did remember the announcer saying that NK is now the wealthiest
    skater ever to compete in the 'pics.
    
    	Soo, Craze, it seems she's raking in the $$$.  Happy?
    
    I remain,
    probably gonna rake in the snow thisted PM  :^(
    Kev
    
155.367Bo Jackson's career didn't merit the hype...life ain't fair...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 08 1994 19:2028
    
>     Obviously, the people that it bugs the hell out of. Nancy Kerrigan was
>     just an Olympic bronze medalist before this incident. Now, she stands to
>     rake in more dough than any figure skater in history. And for what? Not
>     because she's a great skater but because she was lucky (?) enough to be
>     the target of a pack of half-wits. Now, we've got a book about Nancy and
>     the soup commercials are in heavy rotation and Reebok is pushing her heavy
>     although the connection between figure skating and sneakers escapes me.
    
    All of which is the product of those starved for the gossip that the
    tabloid media gladly provides, and not any special action which Kerrigan 
    has undertaken.  Far as I can tell, the grave concern over the
    attention she'll get and the amount of money she's going to make just 
    amounts to jealousy, same as with the other professional athletes that
    we love to hate, except in this case because we're talking about a
    "sport" that appeals more to females that we personally might not be
    interested in, it's somehow worse the assault of show commercials by
    the hoops players.  If people (in general) didn't want to see Kerrigan's 
    face after the Olympics, they wouldn't get it.  The marketers aren't
    stupid. 
    
    I don't even know if I'll watch any of the Winter Olympics much less
    the figure skating (none of it holds much appeal at all), but I don't
    have any good reason to want to see Kerrigan fail.  I hope she does win
    the gold...
    
    glenn
    
155.368METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Tue Feb 08 1994 19:225
>  I hope she does win the gold...

I am sure there is a very rational reason for that (.5 :-)

The Crazy Met
155.369NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 08 1994 19:2710
    
> I am sure there is a very rational reason for that (.5 :-)
    
    Sure there is.  All things being equal (like the athlete isn't a
    complete jerk) most Americans like to see the American athletes do
    well.  I'm not talking about support with fanatical nationalistic 
    flag-waving fervor thrown in, just in general...
    
    glenn
    
155.370METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Tue Feb 08 1994 19:298
for the same reason you could also root for Harding to win the goal.

Actually it would be great to see Harding win the gold - of course the
judges would never allow that to happen. She would have to skate much better
than anyone else to even have a chance at the Bronze medal.


The Crazy Met
155.371You know, those nagging little details, TCM...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 08 1994 19:338
> for the same reason you could also root for Harding to win the goal.
    
    I would, if (personal opinion alert) I thought that there was even a
    remote chance that she is innocent in this affair...
    
    glenn
    
155.372Luge (or might have been bobsled)?CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Feb 08 1994 19:4712
    
    
    	Yabbut just to change the subject.  Did anybody else happen to see
    the tee vee commercial advertising that the OC is looking for kids
    9-12 to begin luge training?  They even posted some 800 number to
    call.  I was half occupied with something else and didn't really get it
    all.
    
    I remain,
    wondering if this begins a new era in USA Olympic involvement
    Kev
    
155.373(8^)*PTOVAX::JACOBTue Feb 08 1994 20:016
    Maybe you shoulc call, Kev, put on one of yer baseball caps, a tight
    pari of underwear to lift the voice a little, and with yer size, ya
    might be able to pass fer a 9-12 year old.
    
    JaKe
    
155.374overexposure inc.TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Wed Feb 09 1994 12:006
Nancy Kerrigan has signed on to guest host Saturday
Night Live on March 19 (presumably with or without medal).
They should have some fun with the Tonya story, huh?

dr.a
155.377It's ridiculous, but don't blame Kerrigan (at least not yet)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 09 1994 13:3434
>     No hoops player, save Michael Jordan and Shaq, has ever gotten 
>     this kind of exposure, and Michael was the best player on the planet and 
>     Shaq has a freak factor from smashing all those backboards. All Nancy has
>     done is take a whack on the leg. By those standards Rodney King should be
>     a billionaire.
 
    I believe that 95% of the exposure that you are referring to *thus far*
    has been involuntary.  That's the distinction I'm making.  Kerrigan has
    no control over the media horde camped at the bottom of her driveway, 
    nor the talkshow buzz, nor the around-the-clock news coverage.  That
    she doesn't "deserve" such attention is quite likely a sentiment
    that she agrees with 100%, that she'd just as soon not have at the
    moment.  I can't blame a seemingly decent, hardworking athlete because 
    she happened to be the unwitting subject of this bizarre story that 
    won't go away.  I hope it goes away as much as anyone else, but not by 
    wishing that Kerrigan crashes into the boards at the Olympics or 
    something like that.
    
    Sure Kerrigan is ultimately going to capitalize on this attention, and
    I'll reserve judgment on how tastefully it's done until that time.  So 
    far I haven't seen much that she's been responsible for that's turned 
    my stomach, and actually think she's behaved pretty graciously, more
    graciously than the average athlete besieged by the media pack.  To
    tell you the truth, I was kind of surprised by the SNL acceptance,
    because that'll be an opportunity to poke some fun and be poked at
    that doesn't fit with the ice queen image (she certainly doesn't need
    to do this).  But whereas most people loved Charles Barkley punching 
    out Barney and having some fun with it, no doubt the cynics will be
    appalled that as a celebrity Kerrigan would go on a comedy program and
    do the same...
    
    glenn
    
155.378Just as overhypedMIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Feb 09 1994 13:514
>     in the last Olympics. No one but Dick Button can name a previous third
>     place finisher. And now the girl is everywhere. She won't be gone three 

      Debi Thomas, the U.S. hope in 1988.
155.379another 10 on TBOS....CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopWed Feb 09 1994 13:5611
 FWIW, Kerrigan was doing Campell Soup commercials before she was attacked.
 Also before she was attacked, I saw an article that figured if she medaled
 at the olympics she'd make about 10 million in endorsements, 20 million if
 she brought home the gold........

 Personally I have nothing against either skater but I'd like to see them
 throw Toyna off the team so that little 13 old pixie could get under
 Tommy's skin just a bit....

 ;^)
155.380METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 14:403
I think SNL was March 12.

The Crazy Met
155.38138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 09 1994 15:3610
155.38238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 09 1994 15:5212
155.384True competitors yearn for competition. Winning's a byproductRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Feb 09 1994 17:0911
    Times are tough when finishing 3rd in the Olympics rates you_a
    "also-ran".  Sadly this is a typical America reaction to SPORTS,
    where finishing FIRST, winning the GOLD, is all that matters.  
    
    Nobody remembers who came in 2nd, nobody cares.  It's the winning that's 
    the thing, not the competing.  
    
    Sad.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
155.385you can tell who roots for teams that CHOKE!METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 17:123
coming from a UNC and Smiffy fan that attitude is hardly surprising.

The Crazy Met
155.386re: .385 I rest my case.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Feb 09 1994 17:231
    
155.387METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 17:298
hahahahaha .386 is precious.

So you are basically admitting that UNC and Smiffy choke in the big ones and
you need to console yourself with the "competition is the thing."

heh heh

The Crazy Met
155.388DECWET::METZGER11 days...Wed Feb 09 1994 17:4118
Actually I think that Kerrigan was one of the gold medal favorites for this
years olympics. yup, she was lousy in the last world championships but
finishing so poorly supposedly lit a fire under her butt to actually go out and
do some serious practice time. It seems like Nancy used to  just  slough around
a lot in practice and not work as hard as many of the other skaters. She was
reportedly skating the best she ever had before the incident....and since we
all know that reputation counts as much in the judging world as actual
performance she had a very good shot at winning the gold even before the hype...

What's unfortunate is that this country is so law-suit aware that an obviously
guilty Harding will most likely be allowed to skate in the olympics for fear of
the presiding committees getting sued....

Dorothy Hamill has made over $100 million off her olympic gold medal...Sonya
Henny (sp) made almost $250 million off of hers....

Metz
155.389I'm sure glad Metz isn't judge/jury/executionerMETSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 18:268
re: that an obviously guilty Harding 

so I guess we forget about due process and convict people based on
assumptions. You may not agree with the safeguards that are buil in
to the system, but they do exist and until that changes it is not
fair to use a different set of rules with Harding.

The Crazy Met
155.390Metz nailed it: why is a conviction necessary?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 09 1994 19:2323
> so I guess we forget about due process and convict people based on
> assumptions. You may not agree with the safeguards that are buil in
> to the system, but they do exist and until that changes it is not
> fair to use a different set of rules with Harding.
    
    In the interests of putting a cap on this rathole I restrained myself, 
    but initially I was going to say that someone (Metz) finally had
    exercised some common sense and reached the correct conclusion of what
    all this USOC hand-wringing is really all about.  Just from what 
    Harding has already admitted to (concealed knowledge of this plot by 
    her associates as the USFSA was deliberating her teammate's fate in the 
    Olympics-- never mind the piles of circumstantial evidence implicating
    her even further, without necessarily having committed a crime), she 
    should be disqualified.  Unfortunately, currently in this country common 
    sense runs secondary to the fear of what a particular jury on a particular 
    day might think.  Personally, based on the evidence and that Olympic 
    contract she signed, I think the USOC has every legal right to boot
    her, and should have the courage to do so and to fight it out in court, 
    if necessary.
    
    glenn
     
155.391METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 19:3014
Glenn,

But Metz was not talking about the USOC's right to hold an administrative
hearing and base the decision on something other than criminal actions.
A statement of obvioulsy guilty sure sounded like guilty of a criminal offense.
I could be mis-interpreting that statement, but I don't think so. Metz??

fwiw when the USFSA was deliberating over putting Kerrigan on the Olympic
team Harding claims she had no knowledge of anything wrt to the attack.

The lawsuit threat certainly has an effect, but it is also making the
USOC think twice before making a decision and that is not bad.

The Crazy Met
155.392Does anybody seriously think she's innocent?DECWET::METZGER9 days...Wed Feb 09 1994 19:4321
I think she's obviously guilty as far as  the USOC charter is concerned and
should be booted off the team. I'd never deny her due process as far as
criminal charges go. The fact of the matter is that she has publicly admitted
enough to justify booting her off the team but all the governing bodies as too
afraid of law suits to do the right thing and chuck her off the team.

The US figure skating body has already stated that she has done enough to be
booted but scheduled administrative action in 30 days which is after the
Olympics to weasel their way out of taking any action on the matter. As fine an
example of CYA as I've seen (even inside of DEC).

Personally I'm 100% convinced by the FBI evidence, Gilgully's statements,
Harding's own admissions and the blowhard Eckhardts testimony to say she's
guilty of a crime but I'm not on the grand jury. I think that only the most
blinded Harding supporters think she wasn't involved enough to get her booted
off the team....

No wonder the courts are clogged,

Metz
155.393METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 19:466
Metz, actually the USFSA scheduled a hearing and under their by-laws
Harding has 30 days to appear. So their hands were tied by their own
rules.  They might have been able to ask for a hearing earlier than they did
but 30 days before Feb 23 would have been tough.

The Crazy Met
155.395show her what a world of bad sports is likeDECWET::METZGER9 days...Wed Feb 09 1994 19:5712
In some perverted sort of way I'd like to see Harding go to the games and get
booed to all hell by a crowd that won't even let her hear her music. I'd like
to see her skate off in tears devestated and then maybe she'd understand a
little bit about what sportsmanship is.

Instead of roses maybe the crowd can throw dead fish on the ice...

Metz


 
155.396METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 20:0027
The USOC may very well decide on 2/15 to not let Harding compete. If they
do so, Harding will likely file an appeal in a US court. US courts are
very quick to grant injunctions. USOC would be bound by a US court's decision.

Come to think of it the USOC could really take the easy way out (brilliant
if I say so myself):

They could vote to remove Harding from the Olympic team, but delay that
removal until Harding exhausted all her appeals. By the time that happened
the Olympics would be over and Harding would have skated. USOC could not
be sued. If Harding wins a medal they could eventually strip it.

re: Harding winning a medal

If she does compete, the odds that she will win a medal are definitely
astronomical. All the other contenders would have to fall flat on their 
backsides for that to happen.

> Kwan kid really deserves to go but won't.

She will be in Norway as an alternate. Keep in mind that there were only 2 
spots on the team. Kerrigan and Harding were odds-on-favorites to be on
the team. So it would be nice if Kwan got to compete, but "deserves?" I don't
agree.

The Crazy Met
155.397FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Wed Feb 09 1994 20:062
    I haven't seen anyone mention it, but the team skating together is an
    Olympic tradition that the USOC chairman said would not be broken.
155.398METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 20:075
Nope, the ISU won't allow the tradition to be broken. USOC was more
than happy to accomodate the request that Harding and Kerrigan skate
at different practice sessions.

The Crazy Met
155.399SI on th and nyfg vs bcAKOCOA::BREENWed Feb 09 1994 20:2518
    SI (btw I hear this weeks issue has some good basketball writing,
    perhaps I'll shell out some cash) echoed my earlier point about
    "misuse of money".  But only hard evidence which th cannot give a
    convincing rebuttal for should be used - nothing in the gildickart
    testimonies.  I mean, the misuse of $ may be the wire they hang her on
    and outweasel nat'l figure skating assn.
    
    Also, in SI (thank god for those dr's waiting rooms) was a recount of
    giants vs colts, '58 (took place apparently in jan-59 because of
    giant-brown playoff).  Boy what memories.  I probably was a bigger
    giant fan then as I've ever been for any team (save 60s celts,'67 sox).
    
    As I've said in other notes and probably again, the difference was the
    drama of the action.  If it exists today I sure don't see it except on
    some radio play by play.  Thank god we didn't have John Maddens and
    Dick Enbergs back then.
    
    Billte
155.400SI question ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Feb 09 1994 20:389
    re: SI
    
    Does this weeks SI have an article on the Duke vs. UNC rivalry?  I
    heard that Alexander Woolf was at the Dean Dome the other night as part
    of a feature story.
    
    thanks,
    
    Chris
155.401USOC will back downOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Feb 09 1994 21:0012
    The Europeans are very upset that all the Kerrigan sentiment may
    persuade the judges to reward her with sympathy points and propel her
    past some other deserving skaters including two-time champion Witt of
    Germany,a frenchwoman and a japanese skater among others.
    
    My guess is the USOC will buckle under and allow Harding to compete.
    The television ratings are too enticing for them to keep her from
    competing before being convicted. They are still smarting from losing
    big in the Butch Reynolds' decision.
    
    
    
155.402MSE1::FRANCUSBilllls in '94Wed Feb 09 1994 22:386
    Witt finished 8th in the European Championships. Not even she expects
    to medal in the Olympics. The big losers could be Bonaly of France,
    the skater from Japan, and the skater from Ukraine.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.403but i'm nuetral...really...SALEM::STIGfor all have sinnedWed Feb 09 1994 23:574
    I think the only way that tonya will win a medal is to mastermind
    another PLOT maybe...
    
                  stig
155.404See ya in court!CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Feb 10 1994 01:159
    
    
    	Yabbut I just heard on the radion that Tonya's attorneys have filed
    a multi-million dollar lawsuit.  No further details.
    
    I remain,
    yer news brreaker (sometimes)
    Kev
    
155.405At Witt's endOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Feb 10 1994 01:534
    TCM:
    
    
    Thanks for the correction. I forgot about the Ukrainian skater.
155.406As the world spinsMSE1::FRANCUSBilllls in '94Thu Feb 10 1994 02:218
    $20 million law suit by Harding against the USOC. They are asking for
    an injunction against any USOC action.
    
    Gilooly is asking for permission to travle to Oslo to testify at the
    hearing on 2/15. Judge will probably grant permission.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.407PTOVAX::JACOBThu Feb 10 1994 03:034
    SO it's all a "get rich quick" scheme for Tonya, eh???
    
    JaKe
    
155.408is it true??SALEM::STIGDogmanThu Feb 10 1994 10:183
    I heard that she is going to pose for playboy also...oh boy...
    
                    stig
155.409DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Thu Feb 10 1994 12:1211
    	I wonder who's paying for Gilooly's trip to Norway?
    
    	Tonya Harding and Playboy in the same breath (or sentence)
    	doesn't quite sound right.
    
    	I think they ought to let TH skate. If she medals, and is then
    	convicted, they can take the medal.
    
    	I heard $20 million law suit.
    
    	Scott 
155.410AKOCOA::BREENThu Feb 10 1994 12:1910
    Chris,
    	I haven't bought the SI yet so I don't know about Duke-NC.
    
    It appears that they are doing a big spread.. ahem on women's
    volleyball or surfing as muscular ...ahem women are on the cover this
    week.
    	I'll see you over in big east as I managed to ketch quite a bit of
    the bc-conn game last night and Russ is waiting with bb for bb's
    comments
    
155.411Heard on Imus this morning, but I can never tell what is a put on on that showCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Thu Feb 10 1994 12:353
Harding was supposed to have gotten $650K for her interview with "Hard Copy".

I'd let them interview me for half that.
155.412NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 10 1994 12:396
    
    The pre-emptive first strike lawsuit... guilty until proven innocent
    until proven guilty...
    
    glenn
    
155.413Fire one!!CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 10 1994 13:2410
    Just goes to reinforce the old story that when you have a bunch of
    lawyers buried up to their necks in sand, you don't have enough
    sand.  
    
    Well this should be all cleared up by the next Winter Olympics.
    
    
    MikeL
    
    
155.414FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Thu Feb 10 1994 15:213
    According to the ACChris School of Conspiracy, Kerrigan and Harding
    have been in this together from the start.  They're giving kickbacks to
    each other from their various stints and endorsements.
155.415and KJ was the hitmanHBAHBA::HAASI Shun You, Version 3 for WindowsThu Feb 10 1994 16:030
155.416What JD really thinks of the soap opera...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Thu Feb 10 1994 18:5414
Did the Internet thang with ol' JD a few times today about running this weekend.
On the subject of the Tonya/Nancy soap opera, he said:

	"Tonya roolz"

When both our friend Phil and I pointed out certain, uhh, virtues of Nancy, 
JD responded:

       "You guys are sick.  Tonya is a real woman, not a fake
	woman like Chopper Kerrigan.  Tonya's a black
	leather type gal, Kerrigan's a preppy whale shorts type
	gal..."

=Bob=
155.417CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 10 1994 18:588
While not particularly caring for either one of them, I will say that
whenever I see Nancy Kerrigan, I can just hear the wind whistling through
her ears.....

Like Imus says "I guess she didn't have much time to spend in the library"


'SAw
155.418CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 10 1994 18:5913
btw, keep an eye out for the Marv Albert video that's being shilled along
with new subscriptions for SI.

In one highlight clip they show two skaters practicing and inadvertantly
bashing into each other.

I laughed so hard when I saw it I almost choked on a piece of my 
sandwhich.  

Skating as it was meant to be, surely!


'Saw
155.419My role modelCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsThu Feb 10 1994 20:0935
    I'm doing a total turnaround on this..
    
    I fully support Tonya's efforts to win da gold.  She epitomizes all
    that is America.. She represents it all..
    
    Trash talks her opponents, smokes Winston, drinks VO on da rocks,
    marries a Tshirt hustler, conspires to commit an assault, admits
    to obstruction of justice, manipulates da press to portray her as
    the "victim" ( her mom tore off her hangnail when she was 3),
    coerces 650K outta 'Inside Edition' for the sympathy vote,
    and the coup de grace... the Americain dream.. She SUES!!
    My hero! I'm smitten! She's up there with apple pie and the flag..
    I hope she runs for political ofc when she returns.  How All-
    American can you get!! Purty soon she'll replace Mike Eruzione as
    America's guest.. companies will be falling all over themselves
    for motivational speeches.. She's on the fast track.  
    All she's left to do is keep it up in Lillehammer.. take a little
    Brillo to her rivals' skates before they go on.. foolproof..
    
    And when she returns, she can take that gold medal and pawn it for 
    a new Chevy truck. What an American icon...
    
    In fact, she impresses me so much, I'm gonna follow her example.,
    I always wanted to figure skate for gold for my country (wheee) but a
    rink rat told me I was too slow. I've suffereed so much
    emotional damage since then, I deserve to be compensated. Let's
    see, where's my lawyers' (Cheatam, Fleeecam, and Sioux) number?
    How do you spell USOC??
    
    I won't forget you guys when I'm filthy rich.. I deserve to be,
    Y'unnerstan'..
    
    MikeL
    
    
155.420I agree MikeOURGNG::RIGGENDigital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's allThu Feb 10 1994 21:249
Mike ya forgot that after te olympics she's gonna bare it all fer Playboy. 
She has used thuggery, sympathy and now her body all for MONEY. What a girl. 
She runs barefoot to save her Chevy from being towed.
She where's a tee shirt that says  "NO COMMENT" 

Next thing we will learn is that she not Hillary developed the Health care 
plan. 

Jeff
155.421DECWET::METZGER8 days...Thu Feb 10 1994 21:447
>Mike ya forgot that after te olympics she's gonna bare it all fer Playboy.

shudder, shudder...

I'm sure Mr T would have some colorful commentary on this layout..

Metz
155.422a file might work in jail though...SALEM::STIGDogmanFri Feb 11 1994 02:086
   and.... they'll probably will do a layout of her working on her truck.
    
      Re. MikeL...I'm roaring on the "brillo" thaing...she'd be able to
    conceal that easier rather than a file. 
    
                   stig
155.424CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Feb 11 1994 12:1217
    Nah Kerrigan's not gonna carry the flag according to the Globe.
    One of the women lugers will do it.
    
    Looks like Tonya wants to give Nancy a hug. Wonder if she'll give 
    her a kidney punch in the clinch. 
    Po' Tonya is a natural actor, she was soooo sincere and demure on the
    Inside Edition edition. Was she as milquetoast with Connie Chung?
    Tonya'd be a natural for the Dominatrix in those female prison
    movies MrT used to salivate over..
    
    Cain't wait till they both skate. Is it true that Tonya will lead off
    with AC/DC's "Dirty Deads Done Dirt Cheap"? If so, Nancy's gotsta
    follow with Ian Drury's "Hit Me with Your Rhythm Stick".
    
    MikeL
    
    
155.425METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Fri Feb 11 1994 12:454
Nah Nancy 'll start off with Pat Benatar's Hit Me With Your Best Shot.


The Crazy Met
155.427CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Feb 11 1994 13:0413
    Yea, she soitanly gets mo' press than mah suit pants..
    As she said in Detriot and I paraphrase "No one prolly knew who I
    was before this, and now everyone will know me." I thinbk she's
    handled it purty well, all this free pub. She already had the Campbell
    and Reebok contracts negotiated. Lowkey is the key for Kerrigan.
    But ah will watch her SNL in March.. just fer sh$t's sake.
    
    I suppose the proposed Harding-Kerrigan "hug" will require mo'
    press credentials than the Israeli-PLO agreement summit.
    
    
    MikeL
    
155.428FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Fri Feb 11 1994 13:587
    >    One of the women lugers will do it.
    
    They have an event for fresh water clamming?!
    
    >    follow with Ian Drury's "Hit Me with Your Rhythm Stick".
    
    boy does that bring back memories!
155.429FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Fri Feb 11 1994 14:045
    Ghandi was too passive and didn't deserve the hype.
    
    >    press credentials than the Israeli-PLO agreement summit.
    
    speakin of faux pas agreements.
155.430Reasons to be cheerful, part 3CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementFri Feb 11 1994 15:415
    MikeL, it's Ian Dury.
    
    Yer weclome.
    
    Mark.
155.43138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 11 1994 16:126
155.43338346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 11 1994 16:319
155.43438346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 11 1994 16:381
    Tommy, don't forget, Nancy is a "local".
155.43538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 11 1994 16:495
155.436CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Feb 11 1994 16:5210
Yabut Saw has been taking his buddy Imus a little too seriously on this 
subject.  The I-man was groping for some reasong to put Kerrigan down, and
for some reason decided to focus on her looks and intelligence.  

As for her appearance, hey, maybe she's no Cindy Crawford, but I still like 
the way she fills up a pair of skating tights.  As far as her intelligence,
bear in mind that we only see her (or Tonya) through the media, and have no
clue what she is really like.

=Bob=
155.438If it ain't sports, and ain't interesting, let's let it goNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 11 1994 17:3115
                      
   >  There's this 
   >  fascination with the seamy side of things and with the sordid de-
   >  tails of people's lives these days that I find to be distasteful. 
    
    So why do we continue to flay this rotting carcass of a subject,
    again... and again.. and again.  We're wasting valuable SPROTS disk
    space and bandwidth, not to mention the talents of some of the most
    sports-knowledgeable resources in the world. ;-)
    
    But seriously, based on the gossip, name-calling and general tawdriness
    going on in here, the media has been tastefully restrained by comparison...
    
    glenn
    
155.439now there's a real challenge for a skaterFRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Fri Feb 11 1994 18:021
    >    skater. She's not supposed to be Hillary Clinton's smarter sister. I
155.440Goodnight, MacFRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Fri Feb 11 1994 18:061
    >    Unless I'm missing something, 
155.44138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 11 1994 18:151
    OK, help me out here, Mike.  How do you define faux pas?
155.442CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Feb 11 1994 18:215
from the 'Merican Heritage Dictionary (BTW, the worst dictionary I've ever 
used):

faux pas  pl. faux pas 
A social blunder [Fr.]
155.443La derriere neufAKOCOA::BREENFri Feb 11 1994 18:242
    I once had faux pas on the back side at Trull but the 15th killed
    me.
155.444FRETZ::HEISERHey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho! Hey! Ho!Fri Feb 11 1994 18:413
    >    OK, help me out here, Mike.  How do you define faux pas?
    
    "social blunder" per the DEC-issued American Heritage Dictionary.
155.445Toy's Rule OURGNG::RIGGENDigital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's allFri Feb 11 1994 19:356
155.446CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manFri Feb 11 1994 19:4515
>                                -< Toy's Rule
 >-

American steel is better 8^)


>Only to pay the driver to take it away. 


I've had excellent luck with my GMC pickup and there's no way I'd
ever buy another Japanese vehicle.   I decided today that my
truck definitely paid for itself this winter.....


'Saw

155.447GENRAL::WADEMy head's in MississippiFri Feb 11 1994 19:578
    
    	You got the "Toy" part right Riggo.  It's nothin' but a toy.
    	When you're ready to graduate up to a real main's truck, you
    	let me know.  I might let you drive mine first to see if you
    	can handle it.
    
    Claybone (owner of a Ford F250 Heavy Duty Supercab 4X4 5 speed wif
    	      a 7.3 l rompin', stompin' diesel!)
155.448BACK TO THE WINTER OLYMPICSOURGNG::RIGGENDigital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's allFri Feb 11 1994 20:0712
Did anybody see the Nowegian ski jumper fall trying to light the torch in 
pratice. 

Ole Gunnar Fidjestol hored to end his ski-jumping career with the leap of his 
life: Flying through the air clutching the Olympic flame at the opening 
ceremonies. But Fidjestol tumbled head-first into the snow, suffering a mild 
concussion that forced him to turn the torch over to another Norwegian Jumper. 

Jeff

Trivia for the Olympics what is AJ kitts real first name ?
 
155.4498^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsFri Feb 11 1994 20:4117
>>CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management"            5 lines  11-FEB-1994 12:41
>>                      -< Reasons to be cheerful, part 3 >-
                     Yes me main, another beeyootiful and whacko ballad
                     by the Haid Blockhaid
    
>>    MikeL, it's Ian Dury.
  
    Ah wot's a dropped "R" among Bostonians.. 
      
>>    Yer weclome.
           ^^
       Thnak yer
    
    MikeL of the FatFingered Police
    
             
    
155.450MSE1::FRANCUSBilllls in '94Sun Feb 13 1994 02:147
    Harding and USOC came to an agreement.
    
    USOC will not hold any hearing until after the Olympics. Harding
    dropped her lawsuit. Harding will be on the US team.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.451MSE1::FRANCUSBilllls in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 02:554
    Tommy Moe wins the Gold in Alpine Skiing downhill.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.452CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 14 1994 11:1813
Just in case folks want to be surprised when they watch the tape
delayed broadcasts, I'd suggest posting updates behind a form-feed:




Duncan Kennedy was disqualified from luge competition when he crashed
during a run today.

He was unhurt, but is now out of the competition.....


'sAw
155.453Updates from Feb 13 and early 14thBRAT::LEARYBear Mountain garage sale finalistMon Feb 14 1994 12:1610
    
    I just heard on WEEI that Dan Janssen was eliminated from the 500m
    speed skating.  Tommy Moe and another US skier are running 3rd and 2nd
    respectively in the men's combined Alpine behind the Nord that was
    favored heavily.  Big boss Koss resets the world record in the 5000m
    speed skating he has personally lowered the world record by over 7
    seconds in the past 3 years.  There were 200,000 people on the waiting
    list for tickets to his race.  WOW!
    
    ML
155.454CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 14 1994 12:1614
In watching the broadcasts for the Olympics, I must say I've been
VERY impressed with the IBM ads.   It's easy to see why we're wallowing
where we are in the marketplace when you compare our ads with those
of Big Blue.

Granted, we don't have the fact that we were picked to help plan the
Olympics to boast about like they do, but those are certainly some slick
and catchy ads.  


I like the Coca-Cola Polar Bears about the best though...8^)


'SAw
155.455Dan now 0-4OPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Mon Feb 14 1994 12:311
    Dan Jansen =  Buffalo Bills of skating.
155.456METSNY::francusBilllls in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 13:293
US skiers finished 2-3 in the Combined Alpine event.

The Crazy Met
155.457CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 14 1994 13:3610
>US skiers finished 2-3 in the Combined Alpine event.
>
>The Crazy Met

You're supposed to use a form-feed.....  8^)

Personally, today I don't care, since I'll be at drill tonight and will
miss the coverage, but there might be some folks who don't want to know
right away.....

155.458CSC32::M_MACGREGORMon Feb 14 1994 13:558
    
    How about we seperate this note into two notes.  One is for results
    which people can NEXT/UNSEEN, and one for discussions like how many
    microseconds you lose for every extra second of air time in the alpine
    skiing event.
    
    Marc
    
155.459sheeshCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 14 1994 14:048
    HAHAHA, good one Marc. Air time indeed.. Well I guess with the downhill
    gold being won by .04 sec. anythang can affect it.
    "Well look at Sven Cahoots on thwe upper part of the course, going
    through that hairpin turn, his head lifted .000000000011 CM off center
    that could mean the difference between gold and plastic..."
    
    MikeL
    
155.460CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 14 1994 14:0516
>    How about we seperate this note into two notes.  One is for results
>    which people can NEXT/UNSEEN, and one for discussions like how many
>    microseconds you lose for every extra second of air time in the alpine
>    skiing event.
>    
>    Marc

I think it's Topic 159 -- I just entered it.

This topic is for discussing things like micro-secods and air time and
how they get in those skin tight suits.....


86)
    

155.461CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 14 1994 14:0718
>    "Well look at Sven Cahoots on thwe upper part of the course, going
>    through that hairpin turn, his head lifted .000000000011 CM off center
>    that could mean the difference between gold and plastic..."
    
You go ahead and laugh you silly Potato-Eater you!

On a serious note, with drugs banned, the advantages are becoming increasingly
more dependent on technology.

I remember seeing a thing during the Summer 'pics in 1992 on usings computer
modeling etc to help marathon runners with their form, to convert all of
their energy from bad form things to positive stuff.

I'll bet the skiers do the same thing.....


'Saw    

155.462Go Aamodt go!HANNAH::ASHEDon't ask me, I'm just the adviserMon Feb 14 1994 14:411
    Moe cost me 2 points in my Olympic Rotisserie standings....
155.464PTOVAX::JACOBMon Feb 14 1994 18:4641
Friends,

Tired of always losing that golf match to the guy who seems only to shoot in
the low 80s when he's YOUR opponent???

Tired of always losing in straight sets to that one tennis partner??

Tired of always losing to the guy who bowl 200+ games???

Well, if you are, call us:


"The Tonya Harding Center for Opponent Neutralization"

Here at the center, we offer affordable ways to temporarily disable, injure,
maim or even dispose of that annoying opponent who always seems to do just one
better than you.  Check our prices:

A simple whack on the knee, $99.95, or better yet, save and get baseball bats
to both of their knees for $149.95.

A kick to the groin(for male opponents only), just $9.95.  

Impailment on a sharp object, in a public place, just $799.95.  

If you act fast, you get this wonderful souvenir collapsible baton, just like
the one used against Nancy Kerrigan as a free gift, AND it's autographed by
Tonya herself.

And, place your order on a Thursday and receive our special rates, buy one act
of injury at full price, receive the second act at 50% off.

Our operators are standing by right now at 1-900-JUST-WIN.

And as a special gift for the first 50 callers in the next hour, we have for
you the Lorena Bobbitt Home Castration Kit.

Call Now!!



155.465HANNAH::ASHEIt's a nice day for - cardigan's...Mon Feb 14 1994 19:047
    Spoiler based on .465 spoiler
    
    I heard the Russian team came together 2-3 weeks ago.   A lot went
    to the NHL (imagine at one point they had a line of Mogilny, Bure
    and Federov).  No Red Army to train together.  Russia vs Unified team.
    All those things add up...
    
155.466HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Feb 14 1994 19:0426
  That's funny.

  Here's a big surprise. I'm home watching the Russian Fin hockey game on TNT.
If you don't want to know what's happening, don't look past the spoiler
warning. 

  By the way, TNT coverage is better than CBS coverage, more sports, no stories
about blind mothers, dead sisters, paraplegic aunts, heart breaking road kill
and the rest of the trash that CBS shovels at us between coverage of hockey and
figure skating. 

  George



  The Fins are killing Team Russia 5-0 with 6 min to go in the 3rd period. The
Russians have never been shut out in Olympic competition but it could happen
here. 

  The announcers claim that the Russian team is no longer what it once was
because of players lost to the NHL and the Fins, who are usually a team of
individuals, are playing like a team. 

  If this holds up, it will be quite the upset. 

  George 
155.467METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 19:086
warning

actually the Fins were favored to win the game

The Crazy Met
155.468HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Feb 14 1994 19:1311
RE              <<< Note 155.467 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>

>actually the Fins were favored to win the game

  Well, the announcers are saying 



  That the Fin's 5-0 win was an upset.

  George
155.469Olympic Update from correspondent Dave Barry38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 14 1994 19:1677
           <<< HYDRA::DISK_NOTES$LIBRARY:[000000]DAVE_BARRY.NOTE;1 >>>
                       -<  Dave Barry - Noted humorist  >-
================================================================================
Note 856.0           Norway fine Olympic host, but it's cold          No replies
ROCKER::KNOX "Rock'n'Roll Refugee"                   71 lines  11-FEB-1994 13:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	( Reprinted without permission from the Colorado Springs )
	( Gazette & Telegraph, Friday, Feb. 11, 1994             )

	Dave Barry, syndicated humor columnist and winner of the Pulitzer
	Prize in Commentary in 1988, is covering the Winter Olympics for
	10 days from Lillehammer, Norway.


  LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- I have located Norway. It turns out to be right 
next to, but different from, Sweden. Also, I'm pretty sure that Finland
is around here someplace.
  
  Getting here was not easy. My flight from New York to Oslo sat on the
ground at Kennedy airport for THREE AND A HALF HOURS while the pilot 
came up with a series of increasingly lame excuses for the delay: he was
waiting for connecting passengers; the dog ate his flight plan; vandals
had stolen the landing gear, etc. I believe that the pilot was actually
stalling  because he didn't know for sure where Norway was. I bet that,
between announcements, he and his flight crew were frantically thumbing
through volume "N" of the World Book Encyclopedia, looking for the
Norway section. ("Here it is!, It's an inert gas!" "No, you idiot!
That's 'nitrogen'!")

  But eventually they figured it out, and we took off and found Norway,
which is a darned good thing because the U.S. bobsled team was on our
flight. Most of the team members were large muscular individuals.
You need to be big and strong for this event, becasue at the beginning
of the bobsled run you have to push the sled hard and get it going very
fast, and then, just as the sled starts hurtling down the steep, icy,
treacherous track at speeds upwards of 80 mph, you have to -- in one
smooth, fluid motion -- let go of the sled and fall down.

  At least that's what I would do. The team members, however, actually 
get INTO the sled, where they are jammed together in a tiny, 
uncomfortable space, very similar to the seat I occupied during the
247-hour flight from New York to Oslo, except without the beverage-cart
service.

  Speaking of which, I noted that one of the bobsled team members had
several rum drinks. I pointed this out to veteran sportswriter Dave
Kindred.

  "It's OK," Kindred said. "He doesn't have to steer."

  Anyway, we finally arrived in Norway. It's a Nordic country, defined,
technically, as "a country where they have a funny little diagonal line
going through the letter 'o.'" Not counting reindeer and fish, Norway's
population is very small. I probably met most of the residents right at
the airport, and they all seemed very nice. They also spoke excellent
English, a fact that makes Norway seem quite foreign to me, inasmuch as
I live in Miami.

  As for the country itself, if I were to descibe it in one word, that
word would be "cold." There is snow all over the place. I don't wish to
be critical of the Olympics Committee, but in my opinion, when you're
planning a major event such as the Winter Olympics, with people coming
from all over the world, it makes a lot more sense to hold it in a 
warmer climate, or during the summer.

  But that is water over the dam (or, as they say in Norway, "Vatter
uver da vatterholderbakker.)" We are here now, and we are going to
make the best of it. Besides, there are many exciting stories to cover,
including:

   1. Tonya Harding
   2. The U.S. speed skaters, and what they think about Tonya Harding
   3. Norway's emergence as a modern industrial nation, and whether  this
      is fair to Tonya Harding.

 I plan to cover all these stories and more in the days ahead. Unless
this would require me to go outside.
155.470METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 19:195
bad editing there. Neon is a "noble" gas, nitrogen is not 

:-)

The Crazy Met
155.471You boobs! ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 14 1994 19:2112
    
    I really wanted to see this game tonight and be surprised, and now you 
    guys have gone and spoiled it for me.  Nice use of the form feeds!  How
    about being a little more deceptive the next time, by saying that
    there's an upset in progress, and that the team being upset used to be
    a big Communist country that was once our Cold War enemy, but now it's 
    a littler Communist country that's not, maybe, sort of, we're not sure,
    that's now known as (warning! team being upset by the team that speaks 
    Finnish as native language behind form feed):
    
    Russia!
     
155.472hoist a lager for the lugerCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 14 1994 19:258
    Dat's OK glenn,
    Watch the Beanpot instead and I won't spoil your fun by telling you
    that the team from the Yahd you can Pahk your Cah in is gonna
    whup those kids who play at a college from the second and third letters
    in the alphabet.
    
    MikeL
    
155.473HANNAH::ASHEIt's a nice day for - cardigan's...Mon Feb 14 1994 19:261
    Wasn't me...
155.474METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Feb 14 1994 19:278
fwiw if the game was on TNT then it is a safe bet that CBS was not including
it as part of their coverag tonight, certainly no more than a few minutes.
TNT may not show events that CBS is using during prime time. 

MikeL:
what does the Beanpot have to do with the WInter Olympics?

The Crazy Met
155.475Why it's RDB. both events held in February crazeCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 14 1994 19:281
    
155.477METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseMon Feb 14 1994 19:414
kind of bogus anyways. some results are broadcast by the time we drive
to work in the morning. All others on the way home.

The Crazy Met
155.47838346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 14 1994 19:473
155.479Tres MiserableCSC32::GAULKEMon Feb 14 1994 19:5112
    
    
      Gotta feel bad for ze french downhill skier yesterday/two days ago.
    
      He was medal contender.
    
     He jumped so hard out of the chute that his right ski came off.
    
     What a way to go.
    
    
     
155.480METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseMon Feb 14 1994 19:545
awright. nitrogen is not an inert gas. feel better Mac?? 

:-)

The Crazy Met
155.48138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 14 1994 19:591
    Now I know why you're in software...
155.482HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Feb 14 1994 20:5057
RE Ladies Figure Skating 

  One thing I've noticed about the coverage of the Karrigan / Harding story is
that the U.S. sports press seems to think that they have a lock on the gold
metal. Even Harding was quoted as saying "now I can win the Gold" when she
heard she was going. 

  Actually they both have a realistic shot, but in both cases it's a long shot.
Odds makers in Vagas are giving Karrigan 7-2 and Harding 12-1. At those odds,
I'd take the bet against Karrigan if I were a betting man.

  There is a tier of 4 skaters that have the best chance for the gold metal.
They are defending world champion Oksana Baiul from the Ukraine, European
champion Surya Bonaly of France, Nancy Karrigan from the U.S. and a Chinese
skater (I forget her name). 

  Baiul really scattered the field at the 1993 World Championships to win the
gold metal. She's been a little erratic lately but she is probably the best all
around skater in the competition. The Chinese skater is probably 2nd strongest.
I believe she was 2nd in last year's championship. 

  Surya Bonaly of France is very strong technically but has had problems with
the artistic part of her program. Karrigan is strong in the artistic portion
but weak technically. 

  If any one of these skaters skates two clean programs in the short and long
competitions, they would probably win. None of them are strong enough to
overcome mistakes to overtake one of the others who skates cleaner. 

  Tonya Harding does have a chance, but it's a long shot. For her to win, she
has to land her "knockout punch", the triple axel, skate perfectly, and all of
the others have to make at least a few mistakes. If she skates perfectly and
doesn't do the triple axel, she won't win even if others do make mistakes, she
just isn't strong enough. 

  All of the women do triple jumps. A triple jump is one in which the skater
skating backwards jumps up, spins around 3 times, and lands on one foot. The
exception is the triple axel in which the skaters skating forward jumps up and
spins around 3 1/2 times landing on one foot. The Axel is the hardest of the
jumps and only a few women have done it including Ito of Japan and Harding. 

  The last time Harding landed the triple axel in competition was in the 1991
U.S. National championships when she beat both Karrigan and Yamaguchi. Since
then she has either not attempted or missed the jump each time she has been in
a competition. Had she landed it in the 1992 Olympics she would have won a
metal instead of finishing 4th behind Yamaguchi, Ito (of Japan) and Karrigan. 

  She's tried it a few times lately in practice. One of those famous "mall"
shots where she falls down is a triple axel attempt gone bad. With it she has
a shot, without it, she probably won't even get a metal. 

  My prediction is that the Chinese girl will win the Gold, Oksana Baiul from
the Ukraine the silver, and Karrigan will finish 3rd to end up with a 2nd bronze
to match the one she got at Albertville in 1992. Harding will stumble, "2 foot"
her triple axel and end up somewhere around 5th. 

  George 
155.483CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 11:285
>
>    Now I know why you're in software...
>

At least he knows his chemistry.....
155.484Two that were made for each otherAKOCOA::BREENTue Feb 15 1994 12:009
    I heard on Imus that their making the Tonya Harding story and calling it
    
    		"Spunk"
    
    Perhaps for the Duane Bobbitt story they'll call it 
    
    
    
    		Shrunk
155.48538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 15 1994 12:512
    What is it with Jansen?  The guy holds the world record yet can't win
    an Olympic medal in 3 tries.
155.486CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 12:5816
>
>    What is it with Jansen?  The guy holds the world record yet can't win
>    an Olympic medal in 3 tries.
>

The Gaspipe Man.....


Some folks just cave under pressure.  I mean, who was watching when he
set the worlds record?  No one of any consequence.  Now that we're all
watching, another choke job....


'Saw


155.487ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Tue Feb 15 1994 13:333
    
    Everytime I hear Dan Jansen's name I cry because he doesn't win the
    gold.
155.488Yea Jansen' got MamaCassSyndromeCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Feb 15 1994 13:551
    
155.489I feel sorry for that guyFRETZ::HEISERGovernment is good for you- Janet NeroTue Feb 15 1994 14:031
    
155.490CSC32::GAULKETue Feb 15 1994 14:2811
    
      Jansen is suffering from a rare strain of 
    esophagus constrictus, found primarily in North East New York
    and portions of the Mid West.
    
      It is not to be taken lightly.
    
      If contracted one time and not administered to promptly, it will
    rapidly grow unchecked.
    
      
155.492CSC32::M_MACGREGORTue Feb 15 1994 14:526
    
    If anyone gets to the end of the previous note, please let me know.  I
    gave up after ~50 returns.
    
    Marc
    
155.493DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Tue Feb 15 1994 14:545
    	I got there.
    
    	He wrote, "Fall, Tonya, fall"
    
    	Scott
155.495METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseTue Feb 15 1994 15:055
re: hockey

mia culpa. Russia was top-seeded in the tourney.

The Crazy Met
155.496USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Tue Feb 15 1994 15:143
    Do what I did... I sent the message back to Heiser....
    
    REK
155.498METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseTue Feb 15 1994 15:264
barf!

The Crazy Met
155.499No more stinking form feedsOURGNG::RIGGENDigital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's allTue Feb 15 1994 15:284
Today results have more Gold for the USA in skiing. 


Womens G/S  sombody like Rotwieller
155.500METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseTue Feb 15 1994 15:303
you tell 'em guy. kind of obnoxious, isn't it??

The Crazy Met
155.501CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 15:382
Well, if you guys don't want to be considerate of other folks, we could
always just set them hidden.......
155.503may the schwatrz be with youwwwwwwwwwwwwwCSTEAM::FARLEYTue Feb 15 1994 15:529
    
    
    >> barf!
    
    
    	Yabbut wasn't that the name of the guy John Candy played in
    Spaceballs?????
    
    
155.504CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 16:2512
>    
>      If you're going to set anything hidden please do it to those 
>     anti-gun control notes. At least the replies in this note have
>     something to do with sports.
>

Actually, I'm not, because I forgot this isn't the form-feed note, that's
at 159 or whatever.

And don't complain about the hunting note, because we've always had
one and we've been over the hunting/guns as sports rathole zillions
of times.....
155.506But I couldn't after reading this oneAKOCOA::BREENTue Feb 15 1994 16:575
    
      >   Extract it out and edit it. At the end of all those form feeds
    >    it says, "Fall Tonya fall!" Try and control your laughter.
    
      
155.507Okay, announcing a gun-control subject for goods give-away....CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 15 1994 17:2426
>    I'm not complaining about the hunting note and you know that. Or you
>    would if you were paying attention. What I find objectionable is the 
>    degeneration of the note into a pro/anti-gun control debate. There's
>    a lively discussion of that issue over in SOAPBOX if you really care
>    to discuss it in-depth and in the proper forum.

I always pay attention.  (So don't be a wise-ass... 8^P)


The subject is relevant to anyone who hunts, target shoots or collects guns.


As to going to Soapbox, a lot of us don't note over there, we note here, so
if it's relevent, why move?


Finally, and candidly, I'm surprised you'd object to anything in this topic,
since you've only popped in here like three times in the entire topic.

But, because I'm such a nice guy, I'll give on this one, and we'll try
to get the gun-control debate to a minimum......

'Saw

    

155.508HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Feb 15 1994 18:0615
   ... Oh well, since the Olympics note has turned into a gun note ...

  Too bad about Dan Jansen and Duncan Kennedy. It appears that Jansen has
failed too many times to call it all bad luck, the pressure must really bother
him.

  It appears that his entire family and circle of friends are really high
strung. Every time he loses the reaction is like a whole town died. If they'd
all lighten up, maybe he wouldn't get so wigged out during big matches. 

  They should have Tommy Moe talk to him for a while before the match. He
seems a lot more mellow.

  George
155.509at this point, it's more psychological than anything elseFRETZ::HEISERGovernmentIsGoodForYou- Janet NeroTue Feb 15 1994 18:083
>  Too bad about Dan Jansen and Duncan Kennedy. It appears that Jansen has
>failed too many times to call it all bad luck, the pressure must really bother
>him.
155.510DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Tue Feb 15 1994 18:536
    	RE: Psychological and Jansen...
    
    	That's what Eric Heiden indicated. He pointed to his noggin
    	and said that Jansen's only obstacle would be mental.
    
    	Scott
155.511HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Feb 15 1994 19:1413
  Of course, the next two guys to go around that turn also slipped, the 2nd
went down and slid into the wall.

  In '88 he was obviously distracted. In '92, he finished but he got beat. This
time the two guys after him tripped indicating an ice problem. 

  Maybe it's all mental but maybe he is just "snake bit". Hard to tell.

  How old is he? They keep saying it's his last time, will he definitely be
over the hill in '98?

  George
155.512KALI::MORGANWed Feb 16 1994 08:545
    Jansen's 28.  Actually I only saw one guy after him slip.  I agree
    with whoever said the whole family is a bundle of nerves, waiting for
    something bad to happen.  For the past 3 Olympics it has.
    
    					Steve
155.513the Original Chokemeister?CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Feb 16 1994 11:046
    
    
    	Yabbut nobody's bashing William Jennings Bryant for his 0-3 record!
    
    ;^)
    
155.514USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Wed Feb 16 1994 11:394
    How the the Ice skating pair from Germany... SHe took a header into the
    ice... FACE FIrst... OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    REK
155.515CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Wed Feb 16 1994 13:3610
This media coverage of the Tonya story has gone crazy.  I heard on the radio
this morning that they were reporting what she had for lunch upon arriving in
Norway.  Guess wht it was.



A CLUB sandwich.

(Ta-boom)
          
155.516From an article on the net...HANNAH::ASHEWe're riding on the freeway of love...Wed Feb 16 1994 14:551
    Dan Jansen: The Bill Buckner of winter sport...
155.517USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Wed Feb 16 1994 15:116
    The WIfe said that yesterday CHannel 4 cut in the regular programming
    to show T_H live getting out of the car in Portland....
    
    REK
    
     this morning...
155.518well at least he won't looseAD::HEATHHave pitchers and catchers reported yet?Wed Feb 16 1994 15:336
    
    
    Just heard that choke artist Jansen has pulled out of the 1500.  Guess
    he couldn't handle another failure.
    
    
155.519now he's a failure *AND* a quitterFRETZ::HEISERGovernmentIsGoodForYou- Janet NeroWed Feb 16 1994 15:341
    well I no longer feel sorry for him then.
155.520HANNAH::ASHEI wonder who's watching me now - the IRS?Wed Feb 16 1994 15:476
    I thought his best events were the 500 and 1000.  Maybe he's preparing
    for the 1000?
    
    Harding got out of the car this morning in  Portland?  I thought she
    was in Norway already.  Did she fly back?
    
155.521DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Feb 16 1994 15:595
    	Jansen is, primarily, a sprinter. So, his events are the 
    	500 and the 1000. I think he skates the 1500 more as a form
    	of training. So, it's no big deal.
    
    	Scott
155.522ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Wed Feb 16 1994 16:042
    
    Jansen is a wuss. Period. 
155.523what a soapCTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsWed Feb 16 1994 16:4912
    Jansen's bypassing the 1500 to conentrate on the 1000.
    Imus said he was bypassing the 1500 cuz he was gonna avoid slipping
    3 mo' times (3x500=1500).
    
    This Harding thang is nutso. Gillooly sells a home video of
    Tonya doing a strip tease to Mumble Trash TV; Her mom LaVona
    sings a song about Tonya on Montel Williams and after fielding
    some hostile questions, collapses and is hospitalized.
    
    
    MikeL
    
155.524SNAX::ERICKSON26/8=3.25 --- 8 tough losesWed Feb 16 1994 17:2012
	I may have the 5000 confused with the 1500. I thought Jansen
qualified for the 1500. However, some new guy who used to skate on roller
blades. Took up speed skating and won the 1500 in some National event.
Dan figured even though he was schedule for the 500, 1000, and 1500. He
would give this other guy his slot in the 1500. So the new guy could
experience skating in the Olympics.
	So I believe Dan had already said he was not competing in the 1500
before the Olympics started. So he isn't being a wuss by not competing in
it. He was already planning on letting someone else take his spot.

Ron
155.525ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Wed Feb 16 1994 17:273
    
    He is still a wuss. Period.
    
155.52638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 16 1994 17:326
    Why, because he didn't bump anyone as he went through the turns?
    
    Speaking of which, do they still do that speed skating free for all
    where instead of heats of 2 skaters they put everyone on the starting
    line?  I think I remember seeing this in the last winter games.  It
    might have been just a demonstration sport.
155.528QUASER::JACKSONTAPay me $32mil to spewWed Feb 16 1994 18:4911
       I was watching the local CBS affiliate this morning, and they showed
    that there are 4 media personel for every 1 (one) athlete.  Can you
    beleive this?
    
      What cracked me up, is the weather guy from CBS morning show was over
    at the Olympics.  What a waist of $$$.  Of course those expenses get
    back to us the consumer.  The charge for advertizing goes up to cover
    the expenses of sending this waste of overhead to Norway, which 
    means product price increases.
    
      Tim
155.529ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Wed Feb 16 1994 19:121
     Janson=Buffalo ... 4 in a row
155.530CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Wed Feb 16 1994 21:0120
Figure skating's got to be a legitimate sport because Scott Hamil
said it was dangerous.  Isn't that one of the defining characteristics?

All kidding aside, the athleticism required by world-class pairs skaters 
is awesome.  And after watching the little German skater belly
flop on the ice, the bit about it being dangerous is gaining some
credibility, too.  Can you imagine what it must be like to be dropped
on the ice from 8 or so feet up?  The ladies that skate with a
partner have got to be tough to compete at the olympic level, and
you know that they take some headers during practice.

So, I guess that puts me in the camp that consider figure skating a
sport.  And I even enjoy watching it (sometimes).  I don't know
what anyone else's criteria are for determing whether or not an
activity is a sport, but I just don't see that figure skating doesn't
qualify.

To each his own.

Jerry
155.531DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Thu Feb 17 1994 11:345
    	Scott Hamilton
    
    	From Bowling Green, Ohio.
    
    	Scott
155.532CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Feb 17 1994 11:417
    
    	Rocky Balboa
    
    	From Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    
    	Terry
    
155.533CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 11:503

	Yo, Adrian!
155.534I'd rather watch Bravo or clear the toilet bowlCSTEAM::FARLEYThu Feb 17 1994 12:0722
    
    
    	Yabbut I really screwed up lasted night!  I accidentally surf
    landed onto CBS and made the mistake of staying there for ~10 minutes.
    
    Can somebody tell me what the hell that little story about the old
    folks whose house was over the blasting area for the skating rink had
    to do with anything????????
    
    Man, this stinks!  If they wanted to show that crap, why not put it on
    Peoples Magazine or some other crap show?
    
    Sorry, CBS but with my disguist about the knee-whack coverage and now
    this, I'm boycotting.  As a matter of fact, I may erase CBS from the
    tee vee channel memory!
    
    Blecch!
    
    I remain,
    also planning *NOT* to buy Tonya's Playboy issue
    Kev
    
155.535CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 12:3027
CBS is caught, I think, between a rock and a hard spot.

They're trying to do two things at once and failing miserably.  They're
trying to pander to the non-sporting public, who'll watch for the
"spectacle" while providing sports coverage to the people who are watching
for the sports.

I'm disappointed too.

The "fluff" pieces on the athletes, are, in some cases, interesting, as it
is kind of cool to see how other athletes from other countries prepare
etc.  But then you run into a time constraint, where you can't show enough
of the competition.

Certain things they show, I'd always enjoy.  I love the way Charles Kuralt
can turn a phrase, and do a voice-over footage of snowy mountains or the
Aurora Borealis.  If they kept the fluff to his 5 minutes at the end of the
broadcast that would be fine.

But I want to see more of the competition.


I'm going to write CBS a letter and tell them what I think.  It might
not make much difference in anything, but it'll make me feel better.....


'Saw
155.536Maybe if we were an Arctic country... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 17 1994 12:4513
> But I want to see more of the competition.
    
    I think there's just not even enough competition there to fill 3 hours
    a night for three solid weeks.  Interesting competition, at least. 
    Maybe if you're the hardcore Olympics fan and really do want to see 
    several hours of uncut biathlon competition or free-style skiing it's 
    possible.  I know I still wouldn't watch.  I'm not complaining; there 
    are still other networks in operation during this period, some of them
    even televising sports...
    
    glenn
    
155.537CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 12:5023
>    I think there's just not even enough competition there to fill 3 hours
>    a night for three solid weeks.  Interesting competition, at least. 
>    Maybe if you're the hardcore Olympics fan and really do want to see 
>    several hours of uncut biathlon competition or free-style skiing it's 
>    possible.  I know I still wouldn't watch.  I'm not complaining; there 
>    are still other networks in operation during this period, some of them
>    even televising sports...
    
I wouldn't mind seeing a live hockey game, or some of the x-country skiing.
Not uncut perhaps, but more than what we're seeing.

Hell, I'd even be happy if we didn't always get the insipid "how are you
feeling, now that you've won gold" questions.

I wish I could win a gold in something, because when they asked me that
question, I'd answer,   "Why, you a__hole, I'm so f___ing happy I could
just s___ my drawers!"

I mean, come on......


'Saw    

155.538CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Thu Feb 17 1994 12:516
Another problem (or maybe another slant on the problem) is that CBS feels 
that they need something for the audience of the shows they replace.  They're
not replacing tractor-pulls, they are replacing sitcoms and nighttime soaps.
They put the fluff in to appease the "Knotts Landing" crowd.

=Bob=
155.539HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 17 1994 12:5530
  The problem of fluff in the CBS Olympics coverage is the continuation of
the controversy that started two years ago at Albertville. 

  After losing money the last couple times around, ABC bid low and lost the
1992 Olympics to CBS. The 1st week of coverage by CBS was pretty bad. Not only
were there production problems but they flooded their coverage with fluff
about the personal lives of the athletes inspired largely by the ratings pulled
by ABC in Calgary in 1988 with their coverage of the death of Dan Jansen's
sister. 

  The calls poured in complaining about the fluff and at the end of week 1 of
1992 CBS promised more sports coverage. Of courses more popular sports were
scheduled so it was no real problem. 

  Now the controversy has started up again. The Boston Globe reported a couple
days ago that calls to the Globe, Boston Ch 7 (the CBS affiliate) and to CBS
sports were once again pouring in complaining about the coverage but this time
the producers at CBS answered that they were going use their proven formula
that is aimed at more than a sports audience. They went on to say that it was
their $295 million dollars. 

  But there is an alternative for U.S. sports fans. TNT has coverage during the
day time that is much more sports oriented. They are not allowed to show any
competition that CBS wants to show later in the evening, but CBS reserves so
little that there is plenty for them to show. TNT can also show anything they
want the day following the CBS coverage. 

  So if it's driving you nuts, set up your VCRs and tape TNT.

  George 
155.54038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 13:084
155.541on the newsCSTEAM::FARLEYThu Feb 17 1994 13:2822
    
    
    Yabbut here's a highlight of today's news
    
    
    Thisted morning was the first meeting between Tonya and Nancy.
    They met on da ice (practice session, doncha know) and Tonya skated
    over to Nancy, put her arm on Nancy's shoulder and whispered
    
    
    
    	"hey, I got this covered....I have the room numbers of all the
    other skaters."
    
    
    
    
    da da Boom!
    
    ;^)
    
    
155.542CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 13:4110
155.543majorityBSS::MENDEZThu Feb 17 1994 14:034
    Saw,
    
    Maybe they are pleasing the majority by showing more fluff????
    
155.544CBS thinks all Americans are only interested in how Americans do...WRONG!CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 14:0911
>    Saw,
    
>    Maybe they are pleasing the majority by showing more fluff????
    

	Maybe Frank but I find it hard to believe that's what the majority
        wants when the biggest sports nuts in the country are well reprensented
        in here and I haven't heard one person in here say he or she enjoys
        the fluff.........

 mike
155.54538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 14:145
155.546CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 14:2311
>    Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?

Probably not.

But, CBS cannot ignore the fact that their Sports department is seriously
hurting, and they can't afford to alienate any of their sports viewers.

Bottom line, they're showing a lot of fluff, and even a non-sports-nut
has to see how insipid some of the questions are.....

Are you enjoying the coverage Mac?
155.547Olympiads from Europe = bad TVOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Feb 17 1994 14:2410
    RE: CBS Coverage
    
    It really makes you wonder why the networks would ever want to bid
    heavily for Olympiads that don't have live prime-time coverage.
    
    The 1996 Summer Games in Hotlanta should be a great TV event because 
    everything will be live in the Eastern prime time zone. 
    
    LA 1984 was the best with the regular evening telecasts going to about
    12:30 every night(9:30 LA).
155.548ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Thu Feb 17 1994 14:294
    
    
    At the last 'pics the same issues were raised, No ?
    
155.549METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseThu Feb 17 1994 14:319
CBS is getting phenomenal ratings this week. Imagine what they
will get next week with the Women Figure Skating. As long as they
are getting these ratings they will stick to their formula.

200 reporters and 150 security personnel were on hand for the
practice skating session that Harding and Kerrigan were at. absurd.
Oh yeah there were a few other skaters as well.

The Crazy Met
155.55038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 14:5210
155.55138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 14:559
155.552CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 15:2122
155.553CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementThu Feb 17 1994 15:2610
                     <<< Note 155.534 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>
    
>    Sorry, CBS but with my disguist about the knee-whack coverage and now
>    this, I'm boycotting.  As a matter of fact, I may erase CBS from the
>    tee vee channel memory!
    
    I'm sure all the CBS folks reading this conference will be disappointed
    to hear this.
    
    Mark.
155.554CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 15:3110
>    
>    I'm sure all the CBS folks reading this conference will be disappointed
>    to hear this.
>    


Hey, you never know who knows somebody else.  I used to work with a guy
that was pretty good friends with some folks at CBS Sports.....

'Saw
155.55538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 15:3616
155.556CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementThu Feb 17 1994 15:379
    These are the first Olympic Games of which I know one of the
    participants.  Kriste Porter, a metal contender for the women's
    free-style ski team, is the daughter of my dentist out of Greenland NH. I
    had a chance to meet her a couple of years ago in Portsmouth at a
    her father's office.
    
    Porter is currently ranked 2nd in the US and 4th in the world.
    
    Mark.
155.557WKRP::LEETCHU.S. Messaging Practice, CincinnatiThu Feb 17 1994 15:3917
155.558CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopThu Feb 17 1994 15:4217
155.559HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 17 1994 16:0212
  Well I've got bad news and I've got good news. The bad news is that I'm sick.
Yuck, I hate to be sick. The good news is that I'm home and in about 2 minutes
the 1994 Winter Olympics will be coming on TV. Armed with my new understanding
of icing and offsides (thanks to this file) I'll probably get to see 1 complete
hockey game followed by all the competition that we missed yesterday because
CBS was covering moose, sick inlaws, battling skaters, and the rest.

  TNT guys, stop complaining about CBS, set up your VCR's and watch it on
TNT. It's all there.

  It's enough to make you start liking Ted and Jane,
  George
155.560I want some stuff, not fluffSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Feb 17 1994 16:0230
>>>    Do you really think the majority of CBS viewers are sports nuts?

	Yes!

	I know the week started bad for me.  I love the Luge, I'd watch it all
day.  Sunday night CBS was hyping the luge as part of their coverage.  What
did we see?  A 15 minute piece on the Duncan Kennedy incident in Germany a
while back.  A few shots of practice runs, maybe at Norway, maybe not.  Then
a list of standings for the day.  I don't think they showed one run in it's
entirety even.  Plus the piece on Kennedy was a rehash of a piece that CBS
had aired before the Olympics.

	Wouldn't bother me as much if CBS wouldn't make statements like:
"We just don't have the time to show all the events.".  The skydiving piece
was priceless too.  I'm sure glad we got to see that instead of 5 minutes worth
of X-country skiing or the like.  Then there was the 15 minute piece on the
mens upcoming event.  Joy O' Joy, there's Brian Botano's last performance in
the 88 Olympics in it's entirety.  Ooops, don't want to piss our boy Scotty 
off, let's show his performance in 84 too.    PUUHHHHLLLEEEAAASSSEEEE!

	I'd change the channels, but my wife has threatened removal of parts I
don't want removed.  I must admit, she likes the fluff, and I don't get it.

	re: X-country skiing.  I'm nuts, I'd love to watch the entire 30Km
event.  But then again, I watch the Boston Marathon from stem to stern too.
At the very least, show the start, a few minutes of the pack at different times
in the race, a crash or two, and the top five finishers.  You could do an 
interesting piece that wouldn't take more than 10 minute of air time.

	Zamboni	
155.561Hey folks the fluff has a reasonOURGNG::RIGGENDigital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's allThu Feb 17 1994 16:059
My wife who never will even turn on any sports type show is watching the 
Olympics with me every night. She is really getting PO'ed when I surf over 
to ESPN to watch hoops when the fluff drivel begins. 
The morning coverage isn't great but you have to admit that the Paula Zahn's 
and Harry what his name are pretty enthusiastic to get the chance to talk
about something other than the crappy east coast weather and how tough the 
commute is into the New York studio. 

Jeff 
155.56238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 16:0713
155.563TNT not much better...SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Feb 17 1994 16:077
I watched Monday.

	It was a hockey game that I didn't care about, and the rest was exactly
what CBS had shown the night before.  I wasn't impressed.  Maybe I caught 
them on an off day.

	t
155.564MKFSA::LONG6 more months and he's all yoursThu Feb 17 1994 16:087
>>  It's enough to make you start liking Ted and Jane,

	Could care less about Ted, but "I'm_not_fonda" Jane...no way, no how
	not a freaking chance!


	billl
155.565FluffSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOThu Feb 17 1994 16:1427
155.566schlep me!CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Feb 17 1994 16:2815
    
    
>>	Now if the motor sports and hockey fans would
    	start coming clean...
    
    
    
    	yabbut Mac, you implying that -TH, Saw and /don are in need of a
    bath and a good deoderant??????
    
    I remain,
    seeing the pot calling the kettle again!
    ;^)
    Kev
    
155.567HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 17 1994 16:596
  YES!!! YES!!! Team U.S.A. v. Canada LIVE coming up in a few minutes.

  Thank you Ted.

  George
155.568CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manThu Feb 17 1994 17:105
>    looking for the crashes.  Now if the motor sports and hockey fans would
>    start coming clean...

Lemme guess, Mac.  You play rugby because you like the shorts, right?

155.56938346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 17:136
155.570DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankThu Feb 17 1994 17:175
	Anybody who watches these idiots frolic in the snows of Norway when 
they could be watching Sports Illustrated models frolic in bikinis deserve 
what they get!

				/Don
155.572GIAMEM::SCHOTTThu Feb 17 1994 17:4612
    re: .569
    
         World Class X-C Racers often hit speeds in excess of 45 mph on
    the downhill portions of the courses they run.  While this doesn't
    approach the 80 mph that a DH racer achieves, its still remarkable
    when one considers the toe only connection of the boot to ski, the skinny
    skis, the lack of a helmet, and the fact they may have already skied
    47.5 kilometers of a 50k race, and be well into oxygen debt.  To put 
    this in further perspective, the average recreational skier at your local 
    ski area rarely gets the opportunity to achieve speeds of 25 to 30 mph.
    
    Russ
155.573METSNY::francusBoston-TheHubOfTheUniverseThu Feb 17 1994 17:474
hmm, I thought TNT wouldn't show USA-Canada since CBS was showing
chunks of it tonight.

The Crazy Met
155.574HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 17 1994 17:5114
RE      <<< Note 155.573 by METSNY::francus "Boston-TheHubOfTheUniverse" >>>

>hmm, I thought TNT wouldn't show USA-Canada since CBS was showing
>chunks of it tonight.

  They just showed the whole 1st period live. I think part of the CBS
TNT deal has to do with TNT owning hockey, especially before the medal
round. I imagine CBS will have the gold medal game.

  TNT is doing a filler piece now, but at least they are talking about
the hockey background of one of the Team Canada players. He also plays
for Maine University.

  George
155.575Details, pleaseTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeThu Feb 17 1994 17:521
    So what's the score????????????????????
155.57638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 18:065
155.57738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 17 1994 18:074
155.578Political correctness roolz!!!TNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeThu Feb 17 1994 18:125
    Thank you kindly for providing me with that information in a timely
    and pleasant manner.
    
    NAZZ
    
155.579ZEKE::SAIAR.I.P. AMA/CCS #235Fri Feb 18 1994 12:1714
    
    How about that Bodine sled ? Gold old USA technology at work developed
    with the NASCAR chassis boys. Looks like they have a real screamer. 
    Fully adjustable chassis, data ack stuff on board, IBM doing all the
    computer work. God, I love those IBM marketing guys.
    
    The Europeans are running for cover, and I think they will be really
    pissed if these guys medal. 
    
    Another feature of racing improving the breed. Go get em, and don't let
    that wuss Dan ("the ice sure is slippery") Jansen near it.
    
    Later
    
155.580MKFSA::LONGI been to Rock-and-Roll-Heaven, OregonFri Feb 18 1994 14:584
	When is the bobsled, both 2 and 4 man, supposed to start?


	billl
155.581LUDWIG::GARRYDallas Cowboys back where they belong #1Fri Feb 18 1994 17:506
    What is wrong with the Russian hockey team this year,they got beat
    again today,it looks like they may miss the medals round for the 
    first time.
    
    
    Tom
155.582HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Feb 18 1994 18:2019
RE Bobsleads

  The Bobsled schedule is as follows:

  Saturday   Feb 19,     2 Man Sleds
  Sunday     Feb 20,     2 Man-finals
  Saturday   Feb 26,     4 Man Sleds
  Sunday     Feb 27,     4 Man finals

RE What happened to the Russian Team?

  The NHL.

  By the way TNT reported that there is a problem with the money paid to the
Russian hockey clubs as compensation for the Russian players playing in the
NHL. It seems that the money is disappearing. Some are saying into Swiss bank
accounts and some are saying that the Russian Mafia is involved. 

  George 
155.583HANNAH::ASHEI'm on a mexican (whoa) radio...Fri Feb 18 1994 18:305
    There is no Red Army team anymore.  If there was, you'd still have a
    team with a line like Bure, Federov and Mogilny.  The team was put
    together a few weeks ago.  They have less experience together than
    the US team.
    
155.584FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Fri Feb 18 1994 18:434
    >    There is no Red Army team anymore.  If there was, you'd still have a
    
    must've been someone else posing as them that played the Roadrunners
    here this week.
155.585PTOVAX::JACOBFri Feb 18 1994 18:5314
    Is it the same all over or what.
    
    What I mean is, the local newscasts all started off yesterday with the
    "story" that Nancy K. and Tonya H. skated at the same time on the ice
    without any incidents.  WTF did they expect, Tonya to show up with a
    9mm to finish off Nancy, or Nancy to show up wif a hokey stick, knife
    attached to the end, for revenge.
    
    I'm sick of the freakin' "story".  The damned newspapers all have these
    pictures of the two passing on the ice........Chripes sake, let the
    f__king thing go, eh!!
    
    JaKe
    
155.586DZIGN::ROBICHAUDTonyaHarding-TrailerParkSkankFri Feb 18 1994 19:004
    	I think the Russians miss Communism.  I do too.  It's like when
    'rasslin turns a bad guy good.
    
    				/Don
155.587MKFSA::LONGand you know they got a helluva band!Fri Feb 18 1994 19:0010
    
>>   I'm sick of the freakin' "story".  The damned newspapers all have these
>>    pictures of the two passing on the ice........Chripes sake, let the
>>    f__king thing go, eh!!
	
	You mean like Mac letting go of the "Pittsburgh fans unable to get
	over Bonds leaving" tripe?  Fat chance!!!


	billl
155.58838346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 18 1994 19:153
    Hey billlllllllllllllll, sounds like a great idea for a contest.  Let's
    predict who we'll hear the last from -- Pittsburghers complaing about
    Barry Bonds or the media doing another piece on Kerrigan/Harding.
155.589PTOVAX::JACOBFri Feb 18 1994 19:174
    Do all of us, MAC, and yerself too.
    
    JaKe
    
155.590HANNAH::ASHEI'm on a mexican (whoa) radio...Fri Feb 18 1994 19:392
    Mike,
    I thought that was the Moscow Penguins, the Penguins "farm" team.
155.591KALI::MORGANFri Feb 18 1994 20:249
    So the Russians had a bunch of players go to the NHL.  Big Deal.  The
    Canadiens have a lot of players there as well, as does the US.  If I
    remember correctly, the breakdown is something like:
    
    Canadiens - 320
    US	      - 90
    Russians  - 60
    
    					Steve
155.592HANNAH::ASHEI melt with youFri Feb 18 1994 20:362
    Which is the makings for the NHL's version of Dream Team '98...
      
155.593HELIX::MAIEWSKISat Feb 19 1994 00:1814
  The TNT announcers mentioned another reason for the Russians losing players.
It seems that the players on the Russian clubs have to live at their camp 8
months of the year only seeing their families on weekends. Because of this, not
only are they losing their best guys to the NHL, but with the lack of travel
restrictions, guys are leaving to play in the minors and for clubs in other
leagues in North America and Europe. 

  Anyway, being sick at home I got to see 2 full days of coverage on TNT. What
a difference, lots of luge, the ski jump half of the Nordic combined, the
Russian German hockey game, and no fluff to speak of. They're doing a fine job.

  Well, back to CBS, TNT is off until Tuesday,

  George
155.595HANNAH::ASHEWe're through being coolMon Feb 21 1994 14:322
    How about that wink?
    
155.596CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 21 1994 14:503
Actually, I kind of enjoyed the Bill Geist spoof of Ice Dancing...

That was about all I enjoyed....8^)
155.598Bolero - wasn't that a dumb Bo Derek movie???CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Feb 21 1994 14:560
155.599CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 21 1994 15:036
>  Hardly the 1st exaduration by a sports announcer,
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^


You ought to (tm) that baby, George.....
155.600Ski Jumping a sport that requires large "FILBERTS"OURGNG::RIGGENDigital the Binary company 0 or 1 that's allMon Feb 21 1994 15:068
I have to admit that Ski Jumping has to be one of the top sports for men/women
with very large filberts. The camera angles are excellent showing just how 
it looks to the competitor and just how close to a controlled fall these
guys are. 

The crowd noise was phenominal. 

Jeff
155.601HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Feb 21 1994 15:3813
RE    <<< Note 155.598 by CTHQ::MCCULLOUGH "Lindsey is four years old!!!!" >>>

>               -< Bolero - wasn't that a dumb Bo Derek movie??? >-

  No, the movie was "10". The Bolero was the music that Bo put on while
seducing Dudley More.

  Torvel and Dean used the same music for their free program in the 1984
Olympics. It was a very artistic and skillful program which revolutionized Ice
dancing and helped them win the Gold metal. They got perfect 6.0's for artistic
impression. 

  George
155.602DYPSS1::ROPERTake a Sad Song and Make it BetterMon Feb 21 1994 15:4710
>               -< Bolero - wasn't that a dumb Bo Derek movie??? >-

>>  No, the movie was "10". The Bolero was the music that Bo put on while
>>seducing Dudley More.
    
    Bo Derek also was in a movie called "Bolero".
    
    - Rope

    
155.603Filberts or Buckeyes?FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Mon Feb 21 1994 15:561
    
155.604Possibly the worst movie ever made - "10" was Oscar material in comparisonCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Feb 21 1994 16:042
Uhh, yes Bo was in a movie called Bolero - I knew that becasue I was one of 73 
people in the United States that paid cash money to see it
155.605ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Mon Feb 21 1994 17:055
    >> Bo was in the movie called Bolero- in a movie called "10"

       ..and her husband was in a movie called "The Ten Commandments"
    
       He's old!
155.606Or "Havlicek stole the ball!!!"AKOCOA::BREENMon Feb 21 1994 17:063
    George,
    	I hope you're not comparing the Moon Landing with the Bobby
    Thompson homerun....?
155.608ITALY vs USA?AIMHI::SMILLERMon Feb 21 1994 17:196
    
    anybody have any updates on todays hockey game between Italy and the 
    USA???????
    
    
    s<
155.609AIMHI::SMILLERMon Feb 21 1994 17:235
    
    Forget it, I found the note !   
    
    
    Steve
155.611Bobbobobsledders go bobbobbobbing along..CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsMon Feb 21 1994 17:2922
    Coupla bobsled tidbits
    
    Jamaican bobsled team was disqualified for "cheating".. Seems like
    one of the Jamaicans was a few pounds too heavy.. :"Now pushing off
    for Jamaica is Nate Newton."...
    
    A leetle brouhouha is developing on the relative success, or lack of,
    of the American bobsled team and :"da Sled".. Mixed reviews on the
    Bodine product. Some complain that the US tried to make the Bodine
    project  a two-year rush job instead of a four year cycle.. what the
    hail do these USOC apologists work for us?? Sheeeoot, the US
    underachieves and the product is immature. What about the bobsledders?
    
    In an ironic sideshow, one of the bobsledders (Stimer?) tried to have
    his pardner booted off the squad for his lack of committment and
    "partying too much". USOC didn't pursue the allegations, reportedly
    corroborrated, becuase it was fearful of repercussions ( hello
    Tonya? can I retain your barristers?). 
    USOC is quickly resembling the eunuchs of ancient kingdoms..
    
    MikeL
    
155.612FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Mon Feb 21 1994 17:323
    It would make more sense for them to have a competent driver (like this
    year's Gold winner) test out the sled.  It's obvious our bobsledders
    aren't quite there yet.
155.614HANNAH::ASHEWe're through being coolMon Feb 21 1994 17:442
    they would have been 25th of 43 if they weren't disqualified...
    
155.615CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manMon Feb 21 1994 18:0330
>    A leetle brouhouha is developing on the relative success, or lack of,
>    of the American bobsled team and :"da Sled".. Mixed reviews on the
>    Bodine product. Some complain that the US tried to make the Bodine
>    project  a two-year rush job instead of a four year cycle.. what the
>    hail do these USOC apologists work for us?? Sheeeoot, the US
>    underachieves and the product is immature. What about the bobsledders?


Shimer said the sleds were great, but he's been having an off-year.
The other driver said he didn't like the runners.

Shimer I think was just grousing about his brakeman, because they're
having an off-year and they weren't getting good starts.

As to it being a four year project vs two, I've heard Bodine and the
guy from Chassis Dynamics talk about that a couple of times.  When Bodine
first approached whoever it was and got together with the chassis shop
in Oxford, they were not aware that they two-year interrim was going to
be put in place.  They thought they had four years to do it.  


I think the sleds are in good shape -- we could just use a few new
bobsledders 8^).  Seriously, it was nice to see them run on the American
sleds.  I think that there is a lot of potential there, and between now
and 1998 maybe we can find some good bobsledders....


'Saw    
    

155.61638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 21 1994 18:124
    From what I read it sounds like something on the American sled is
    broken.  At first the driver thought it might have had something to do
    with the brakeman, so he switched brakemen for a run.  That didn't do
    any good so they started to take a look at the sled.
155.617Supposed to be an example of ny humorAKOCOA::BREENMon Feb 21 1994 20:186
    > with the brakeman, so he switched brakemen for a run
    
    Tcm,
    	How does that NY line about the honest brakeman go?
    
    He never stole a freight car...
155.618METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanMon Feb 21 1994 20:205
hmm, I honestly don't know.

anyway sound like 1930's humor, before my time :-)

The Crazy Met
155.619not the challenger...SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Tue Feb 22 1994 04:043
    what!! Nassar screwed up again???
    
               stig
155.620MKFSA::LONGand you know they got a helluva band!Tue Feb 22 1994 11:2417
	Okay, did anyone else happen to see the "crash and burn" the US
	Ice Dance team took?  I know, it was a weak moment and I happened 
	to look up from my book while the wife was engrosed in the 'pics.

	Anyhow, it would seem that the guy's skate hit a screw which was
	lodged in the ice.  It happened during a lift move.  The woman
	was about 5 feet off the ice with her legs in a split.  He lost his 
	balance and dumped her flat on her back with him faling on top of
	her.  It was not a pretty picture.

	They did get up and continue the program, though.  Immediatly
	afterwards the guy skates over to where they fell and picks up this
	screw and shows it to the judge.  I figured surely they are going 
	to let them do their routine over, but no dice.


	billl
155.621was Harding in on this one too???SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Tue Feb 22 1994 12:203
    in other words they got screwed...
    
                 stig
155.623DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Tue Feb 22 1994 12:4014
    	They asked Jared Swallow later if he hit the screw. He said,
    	"No, it was over there and we were over here. I just caught
    	 an edge."
    
    	It was pretty clear on replay there he did catch an edge. I
    	couldn't see anything on the ice near his feet.
    
    	Punsalan was on her feet mighty quickly for having landed on
    	her back like she did.
    
    	She's had a tought 3 weeks, what with her dad being murdered
    	(probably by her brother).
    
    	Scott
155.624ELMAGO::BENBACAI've lost it. Help me find it!Tue Feb 22 1994 12:552
    The screw is supposed to have come from the roof. The place is falling
    apart I tell you....
155.625CSC32::M_MACGREGORTue Feb 22 1994 14:2212
    >They asked Jared Swallow later if he hit the screw. He said,
    >"No, it was over there and we were over here. I just caught
    > an edge."
    
    Actually, if you caught the entire interview...Jared was quite
    sarcastic, saying that he talked to the judges who said he caught an
    edge and then the above quote was stated.
    
    However, I agree that he did not touch the screw.
    
    Marc
    
155.626METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 14:2812
well one of the men figure skaters was allowed to redo his progrma when
he showed the judges that a screw on his skates was loose.

WEEI is running a contest on the Kerrigan-Harding matchup. Send in a card
with the places they will each come in. If you win, the prize is:

If Kerrigan beats Harding a free skating lesson
If Harding beats Kerrigan a free martial arts lesson.

talk about poor taste.

The Crazy Met
155.627Who need politicsSTRATA::HUITue Feb 22 1994 14:5025
I don't know what you all think, but did Torville and Dean got the shaft or
what? I did not see the silver medal performance but the couple who won the
gold did not do anything spectacular for me. Their moves were nothing compare
to the British couple.

I guest there are some restrictions for number of lifts and assisted lifts.
I guess the judges though the British couple may have broke the rules. But 
the couple who won the gold medal did not performed perfectly either. Lets get 
the instant reply going to see if they did break the rule first before you
hand out the medals.

It also seesm like there is not any movement in placing for this sport. No
manner how good you skate, you will not recieve the high marks unless you are 
the top 3 couples. The US pair stayed in 14th until the fall. A few other 
couples stayed in 10 and 4 place throughout the 3 phase of the competition. 
I can not beleive they still call this a sport.

Let's get some timers and put up some fences. Then have them complete the
course in a certain amount of time. Maybe that will shake up the standings.

Get the politics out of the sport.


HUEY
155.628HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Feb 22 1994 14:5431
  Only one more day to go before round one of the Kerrigan/Harding show down.
Reports on Harding's ankle are that it's better and she should be able to
skate. 

  My guess for the most likely order is as follows

    Gold    Oksana Baiul - Ukrainian
    Silver  Lu Chen - China
    Bronze  Nancy Kerrigan - U.S.A
    4th     Surya Bonaly France - France
    5th     Toyna Harding - U.S.A

  Lu Chen is a bit of a dark horse but I'm guessing that her time has come.
These skaters are fairly evenly matched so the scores should be close. If
anyone wins both the long and short programs it would be a coincidence. Surya
Bonaly did beat Oksana Baiul in the European championships and Kerrigan skated
well against them in Japan but I believe those were upsets.

  Any of these competitors could drop out of contention Wednesday night. They
say that you can't win the gold in a short program but you can lose it because
of the required elements that cost .5 out of 6 for each one missed. On average
with a field like the one above two random skaters would have a bad short
program and plunge down the list.

  If Harding hits her triple axel and skates both programs clean, she'll move
up into medal contention. Without her triple axel, at least 2 of that group
would have to really mess up for her to have a shot at a medal. She hasn't
landed the triple axel in competition since the 1991 Nationals and usually
flubs it in practice. 

  George
155.629METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 14:595
Harding was hitting the triple axels Sunday and Monday. Her only real chance
is to hit the triple axels, skate a clean program and have the others mess
up. If any of the others skates cleanly no way Harding gets the gold,IMNSHO.

The Crazy Met
155.630METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 15:003
CBS radio will be carrying the skating competition live. WEEI in Boston.

The Crazy Met
155.631?????????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MHall of Fame #75Tue Feb 22 1994 15:0512
    
    
       It said in the paper this morning the Us had 4 golds?
    
    
    Moe 1
    Jansen 1
    Blair 1
    ?????????? Who's got the other one??
    
    
    Chappy
155.632Other goldOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Tue Feb 22 1994 15:091
    Other gold is in women's skiing.
155.633too many fixesOUTSRC::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Tue Feb 22 1994 15:382
155.634HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Feb 22 1994 15:3917
RE<<< Note 155.629 by METSNY::francus "/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivan" >>>

>Harding was hitting the triple axels Sunday and Monday. Her only real chance
>is to hit the triple axels, skate a clean program and have the others mess
>up. If any of the others skates cleanly no way Harding gets the gold,IMNSHO.

  If she does a triple axle, she'll only do one and it will be in the long
program. If she lands it and skates clean, she'll probably win. Since the
elimination of school figures after '89, no woman who's landed a triple axle in
competition has lost. 

  Surya Bonaly of France is the only other woman skater who can do a triple
axle, in fact she even has a quadruple toe loop but she lacks the artistic
element of the program. So if Harding lands her triple axle and skates clean
she should win (baring points lost to politics of course). 

  George 
155.636CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementTue Feb 22 1994 15:524
    George, try auto racing, horse racing, golf, track and field, and skeet
    shooting for starters.
    
    Mark.
155.63738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 15:542
    Speaking of ice dancing, when will ballroom dancing be included in the
    Summer Games?
155.638MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Feb 22 1994 15:5415
> Surya Bonaly of France is the only other woman skater who can do a triple
> axle, in fact she even has a quadruple toe loop but she lacks the artistic
> element of the program. So if Harding lands her triple axle and skates clean
> she should win (baring points lost to politics of course). 
 
  Tonya also has the knock of being athletic, and yet artisticly impaired.
  She will be fortunate to be in the top four after the short program.  In that
  position, she will have to rely on major mistakes from above as well as
  skating clean and hitting the triple axle, in order to get more than a bronze.
  If she fails to hit the triple axle in the long program, she has no hope for
  a medal.

  Surya Bonaly is much more athletic and slightly better on the performance
  numbers.  My guess: Gold Bonaly, Silver Bayul, Bronze ?  [Kerrigan if her
  knee holds up.]
155.639METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 15:5817
re: figure skating

I meant that the politics will come into play which lessens Harding's chances.

re: judgement

Come on George! Comparing judging in figure skating to an umpire or
referee making a call on a close play does not work. There are few such calls
in any given game and the players decide the game. In figure skating the
judges have soooo much leeway that the whole scoring is too subjective.

My brother was joking that the reason there is a score for artisitic impression
is that the judges can use that as a weapon against or for particular skaters.
Might not be that far off.

The Crazy Met

155.642METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 16:0320
re: .638

good point. after the short program the skaters who are 1,2,3 can win the 
competition by winning the long program. All other skaters need some
help. That is what makes that placement so important. In 1992 the standings
after the short program was Yamaguchi, Kerrigan, Bonaly(?), Ito. Ito won
the long program, Yamaguchi was second and won the gold. Ito needed someone
else to beat TYamaguchi to get the gold.

In the short program there are 6 (?) jumps/moves they have to do. The artistic
part is much more important in the long program. Harding is very good 
technically so she could do fairly well in the short program.
I am sure CBS is hoping for Kerrigan and Harding to both be in the top 3 after
the short program.

Harding skates 8th in the short program, Kerrigan 26th (second to last). 
Kerrigan will be skating after all the other contenders which is supposed to
be an advantage. Order is determined by a random draw.

The Crazy Met
155.644METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 16:087
>  How about George Brett cranks one out, Billy Martin complains that the bat
> has too much pine tar, the umpire calls him out ...

you're talking about exceptions, not what usually happens. That should tell
you something.

The Crazy Met
155.646CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 22 1994 16:129
George sounds like a candidate for one of Tommy's  "you've got a little
too mucy free time on your hands" remarks.

There's a vast difference between a sport where the total scoring is
based on a judges judgement of performance and sports where rules are
occasionally based on a judgement call.

George, some of your examples are weak.  Go back to Examples 101 and
come back when they measure up.....8^)
155.649CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 22 1994 16:218
>  but not everything. The original comment said that sports where the score
>is determined by a judge should be changed and I've listed sports where the
>score is determined by a judge. Even on an obvious home run, the umpire makes
>the call by waving his hand.

A mere formality.


155.650I like events with no subjectivityBSS::MENDEZTue Feb 22 1994 16:2913
    Reply to .641
    
    There is no judge involved in speed skating, downhill, slalom,
    bobsledding, cross country, luge, etc.  
    
    It is the fastest person wins...period.  Its not based on looks,
    or previous competition, or tradition, or anything else that is
    real subjective.  To me, while figure skating is entertaining and
    athletic, and requires lots of training it just seems tainted that
    a panel of judges determine who is the winner.
    
    Frank Mendez
    
155.65238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 16:5030
155.654CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 22 1994 16:5614
>       it's over the centerfield fence he isn't going to detract points 
>       because you didn't swing in a artful, graceful manner. And they
>       don't give points for pirouetting around the basepaths.

Man, as great as he was, The Babe would've surely lost points for his
jog around the bases.......


Although Chuck "I was a Porno Star" Connors did a home-run one time where
he did diffeent things between bases.....cartwheels, and stuff.

I'll be he'd have scored high in the George System......
    

155.65638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 17:2913
155.657TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Tue Feb 22 1994 17:344
Mr Ryan didn't say figure skating wasn't a sport.
He said it was a "bogus sport."

dr.a
155.659METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 17:483
Very surprising that Torvill and Dean broke those rules.

The Crazy Met
155.662CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 22 1994 17:566
And you know it was worse back in the days of the Iron Curtain.

The judges from behind the Iron Curtain always marked low for non-Communist
countries etc...  

'Saw
155.665MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Feb 22 1994 18:098
	George seems to be claiming that Torvill an Dean's scores were
	low because they violated an objective rule:  too many lifts.
	That was Tract Wilson's explanation last night because she couldn't
	see any other reason why the technical scores were so low.  However,
	the chief of the judges has come out and said that they did NOT
	find them to violate any objective criteria.

	Rick Rollins
155.666back to the topic :-)METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 18:1460
Approved: doug@clarinet.com
Path: mets86.two.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!decwrl!wupost!looking!bass!bass!clarinews
Comment: Subject mapped from all upper case
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Reuter/Martin Nesirky)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.olympic,clari.news.interest.animals,clari.news.trouble
Subject: Fifteen Elk Killed by Trains during Lillehammer Games
Keywords: urgent
Copyright: 1994 by Reuters, R
Message-ID: <XRolympics-elkUR9a4_4FM@clarinet.com>
References: <RolympicsUR1e9_4FC@clarinet.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 94 2:50:15 PST
Expires: Tue, 1 Mar 94 2:50:15 PST
ACategory: international
Slugword: OLYMPICS-ELK
Priority: regular
ANPA: Wc: 372/0; Id: a0286; Src: reut; Sel: reute; Adate: 02-22-N/A
Lines: 40
Xref: mets86.two.dec.com clari.sports.olympic:1184 clari.news.interest.animals:160
clari.news.trouble:1393

	 LILLEHAMMER, Norway (Reuter) - Fifteen elk have been hit and
killed by trains in the Olympic region since the Lillehammer
Games began despite elaborate measures to deter the huge animals
from wandering into danger.
	 Railroad workers even headed off into the snow-filled forest
along one line to frighten eight elk away on Monday after they
were spotted by helicopter getting too close to the track,
Norwegian State Railways (NSB) spokesman Stig Pettersen said
Tuesday.
	 ``With all the snow this winter, the elk are seen near the
line almost every second day,'' he said. ``But this is the first
time I have heard of our people actually going out to them.''
	 The NSB and local authorities are using a cocktail of
measures -- including the deterrent smell of wolf urine and
enticing food parcels -- to keep the moose-like creatures off
the rails as dozens of trains transport up to 20,000 people to
and from the Games each day.
	 Pettersen said since the Olympics began on February 12, 15
elk had been struck and killed.
	 So far, none of the trains has been delayed. On Tuesday, NSB
laid on 16 extra trains to transport Norwegian fans to the men's
4x10km cross-country ski relay race and to the ski jumping, said
Dagfinn Berge, who is coordinating Olympic trains.
	 ``Every train is on schedule,'' he said.
	 An average adult male elk weighs up to 660 pounds and
measures up to 6.5 feet high -- and that is just to the
shoulders. But it is still no match for an NSB locomotive
carrying hundreds of people through the Norwegian countryside.
	 Near-record snowfalls have forced elk out of the forests and
on to the tracks where it is easier to walk.
	 Thirteen elk were killed on the Olympic line in January
alone compared with six throughout 1993.
	 A helicopter chartered to monitor the elk spotted more than
60 near the tracks on Monday and alerted workers on the ground
to head off one group of eight.
	 In addition to the helicopter, which has an infra-red device
to ``see'' the animals at night, officials have been putting out
hay and pine needles at cleared areas in the forests and have
distributed artificial wolf urine near the rails to frighten the
elk back into the woods.
155.66938346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 18:275
155.670OUTSRC::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Tue Feb 22 1994 18:303
155.671MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Feb 22 1994 18:356
>  So yes or no, did he or did he not lift her over his head to end the routine?
>
>  George

   He did.  He's allowed to do that.  He is allowed to do up to 5 lifts in one
   routine.
155.67438346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 18:439
155.676MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Feb 22 1994 18:5512
>>   He did.  He's allowed to do that.  He is allowed to do up to 5 lifts in one
>>   routine.
>
>  But not over his head. That's only allowed in pairs.
>
>  George

     That's not my understanding, and no one mentioned it either last night,
     or on the news wire reports.  He can throw her over his head, but he
     can lift her over his head.  (Moreover, I suspect that Christopher Dean,
     acknowledged as the world's best choreographer, would be aware of a move
     that in and of itself would cause points to be deducted).
155.677CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manTue Feb 22 1994 18:5915
I can't believe we're discussing FIGURE Skating in here.  Who ever gave
a rat's ass about such a BOGUS "Sport" (Ryan was right).

Too bad Bob Hunt isn't still around.  He'd have set the record straight.

Figure skating is a "Cindy Sport".  No doubt about it.  

Who cares how many lifts or assisted jumps they did.  Basically, no matter
how you cut it, or dice it, or more approriately, julienne it, it's still
a bunch of artistic expression judged by 8 judges.

It's like saying Salvatore Dali gets a 5.8 for artistic impression in 
his "Persistence of Memory", but Picasso only gets a 5.4 for "Guernica".

Makes about that much sense.....
155.679METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 19:025
'Saw you might have something there when you rate those paintings. Maybe
one of the auction houses will pay you to do some research for this. Heck
if someone can give wines a rating on a 100 point scale, why not art.

The Crazy Met
155.68038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 19:154
    'Saw, they aren't even talking about Figure Skating.  They are talking
    about Ice Dancing.
    
    Will we seem ballroom dancing in Atlanta in '96?
155.683METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 19:217
> a routine that they performed in Prague

Actually they changed 70-80% of the routine they
did in Prague because they realized that was not 
the kind of stuff the judges were looking for.

The Crazy Met
155.684CSC32::GAULKETue Feb 22 1994 19:2215
    
  re 155.660
    
       >>You'd be hard pressed to name another "sport" where the athlete
       >>is at the complete mercy of a group of judges who can simply dismiss
       >>a particpant because they just weren't their cup of tea.
    

    A rookie in the NBA that "never gets a call."
    
    
    
    

    
155.68638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 19:423
    If the Olympic coverage is getting you down, you can always watch
    "Spunk", Comedy Central's version of the Tonya Harding story.  I think
    it's on Wednesday night.
155.687METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 19:453
Comedy Central - time? channel?

The Crazy Met
155.68938346::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 22 1994 19:465
    Channel -- Comedy Central
    
    
    If you're in Worcester that's 32 on your cable box.  I don't recall
    what time it's on.  Probably around 8 or 9 PM.
155.690METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 19:513
don't get that channel in Cambridge.

The Crazy Met
155.691OUTSRC::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Tue Feb 22 1994 19:531
155.692METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 19:545
>  So which is more the "Cindy sport": Soccer or Figure Skating?

no contest, figure skating by a landslide.

The Crazy Met
155.695leave my wife outta this(she reads at night 8^)CTHQ::LEARYCorporate Telecom Technology SolutionsTue Feb 22 1994 20:011
    
155.696You had the "cool guy" part right, though...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 22 1994 20:0310
    
>>    So which is more the "Cindy sport": Soccer or Figure Skating?
>
>  Who's Cindy?
    
    Bob Hunt's wife; you know, the guy who would never trash sports like
    figure skating or gymnastics, but often did with exactly this term...
    
    glenn
     
155.698METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 20:198
>  So a Cindy sport is a sport that Bob Hunt's wife likes?

in the narrowest sense yes. the term has come to mean more than that. you
nned to go through the archived notesfiles - Junk note is a good place
to start - and read about Cindy movies, etc. to really understand the
term.

The Crazy Met
155.699BSS::MENDEZTue Feb 22 1994 20:2015
    Figure Skating is not a "cindy" sport but Ice Dancing is.
    
    And the judges are "cindy's" as well.
    
    Did anybody catch the mens competition this weekend.  I thought it was
    quite interesting that Scott Hamilton pointed out before the skating
    started that the judges were real traditional in their judging and that
    Elvis and Phillipe would not fare well in the presentation scoring.
    
    Guess what happens?  Elvis and Phillipe skate a great techincal program
    and then get bounced based on presentation.  Those judges are a bunch
    of "cindy's"
    
    Frank Mendez
    
155.700METSNY::francus/er's heroes:VictorKiam and PatSullivanTue Feb 22 1994 20:214
I thought Phillipe fell during his program??

The Crazy Met
 
155.701filbertsBSS::MENDEZTue Feb 22 1994 20:223
    He did but he was the only one with the "filberts " to attempt a triple
    jump at the end of his program.
    
155.702HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Feb 22 1994 20:377
  Remember, all the U.S. and Canadian skaters are good friends of Scott
Hamilton. They are something of a tight community that hangs out together at
Ice shows. Also, CBS likes the announcers to get people excited about the U.S.
athletes. 

  Factor that in to what you hear from Scott Hamilton,
  George 
155.703OUTSRC::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Tue Feb 22 1994 23:123
155.704USCTR1::KINGCemeteries = Parks with nice stones...Wed Feb 23 1994 11:106
    I was watching the short track spedd skating relay lasted night I tell
    ya.... I never laughed so hard in my life.... What a great sport to
    watch... Demolition Derby on skates... Gotta love the "tag" between
     the relay teams.....
    
    REK
155.705CTHQ::LEARYHeyNancy! WannaGoOutForACouplaPitchers?Wed Feb 23 1994 11:445
    Great minds think alike REK!!(hold on a sec, me and REK.. HELP!!)
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
155.706DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Feb 23 1994 11:4513
    	To add more fuel to the Ice Dancing fire...
    
    	CBS interviewed Torville and Dean last night. Tracy Wilson
    	also talked about Gritchuk and Platov, saying that you cannot
    	separate for more than 5 seconds at any one time.
    
    		First separation = 10 seconds (should be a deduction)
    		Second separation = 8 seconds (should be a deduction)
    
    	All I would ask is that the judges judge all couples fairly.
    	It appears they didn't.
    
    	Scott
155.708Just one time,one timeAKOCOA::BREENWed Feb 23 1994 12:017
    Heard today on Imus that Vegas is taking bets on the figure skating
    today.  Can you imagine a line on something entirely decided by judges?
    
    If this betting trend continues how does one get one of these judging
    jobs?
    
    billte
155.709HTHWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MHall of Fame #75Wed Feb 23 1994 12:036
    
    
    Harding 15-1 
    Nancy  4-1
    
    Chap
155.712ISFHCTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Wed Feb 23 1994 12:5113
>>  I'm really sad to see that you are twisting things around so much to try to
>>win your argument. .
    
>> Ok, no problem, now I know how you argue, more important to save
>>face than to get the facts straight. I'll remember that.

  Congrats George, you have solved the riddle. Welcome to SPROTS
    tradition... "BrydieSpeak"
    
    My hearfelt kudos..
    
    MikeL
    
155.713Chris and Jill, sittin' in a tree...BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Feb 23 1994 12:5410

	Speakin' a Christopher Dean, he's announced his engagement to Colorado
	Spring's own Jill Trenerary (former World and Olympic champion in 
	women's singles).  She even went to school where I got my
	undergrad, the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs.  Saw her
	once in the CS airport, really nice (no, I didn't ask for her
	autograph while talking to her), and not too bad looking either.

	Kevin
155.714robbin' the cradle ole Chris isGENRAL::WADEMy head's in MississippiWed Feb 23 1994 13:204
    
    	Jill won an Olympic gold?
    
    Claybone
155.715I thin soBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Feb 23 1994 13:2415
>         <<< Note 155.714 by GENRAL::WADE "My head's in Mississippi" >>>
>                      -< robbin' the cradle ole Chris is >-
>
>    
>    	Jill won an Olympic gold?
>    
>    Claybone


	Thought so, that's what I remember from the article in the paper.  Maybe
	George, ::SPROTS esteemed skating analyst, can help us out.  BTW, she's
	25, he's 35.  I'm 35 and he looks a heck of a lot older than I do, 
	maybe it's my genes!

	Kevin
155.717GENRAL::WADEMy head's in MississippiWed Feb 23 1994 13:274
    
    	How soon we forget Kristi Yamaguchi!
    
    Claybone
155.718Isn't Jill from Canada, and did win last 'pics?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Wed Feb 23 1994 13:280
155.719PredictionsOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Feb 23 1994 13:289
    Predictions FWIW
    
    1)Oksana Baiul (Ukr)
    2)Cheng Lu (Chi)
    3)Nancy Kerrigan 
    4) Katarina Witt
    5) French skater
    6) Tonya Harding
    
155.720Medalists since 1976OPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Feb 23 1994 13:3011
    I don't believe she won any medals. The last gold medalist before
    Kristi Yamagucci(1992) was Dorothy Hamill(1976). I believe the top US 
    finishers since then are:
    
    1980-Linda Fratianne (2)
    1984-Rosalyn Sumners(2)
    1988-Debbie thomas (3)
    1992-Nancy Kerrigan (3)
    
    Not positive,memory is starting to go.
    
155.721CAMONE::WAYHorseshoes and hand-grenades, manWed Feb 23 1994 13:319
>	I'm 35 and he looks a heck of a lot older than I do, 
>	maybe it's my genes!

Kevin,

35 is a very good age.


'Saw
155.722She is a dish...KALI::MORGANWed Feb 23 1994 13:353
    I believe Trenery won the World Championships in '91.
    
    					Steve
155.723MKFSA::LONGand you know they got a helluva band!Wed Feb 23 1994 13:3716
	Now correct me if I'm wrong (like I gotta say that), but isn't this
	the same ::SPROTS crowd who was totally flabergasted when Ice Skating
	was determined to be the #1 'sport' watched on the tube?  This 
	happened way before the 'Kerrigan clubbing'.  

	As I recall most in this file called it a tainted survey that didn't
	represent the actual sports viewer's feeling.

	Now we have the Winter Olympics going on and all you SPROTSfans 
	can find to talk about is ice skating,  And the media darling hasn't 
	even drawn her first completly subjective score.

	Guess that survey was right.


	billl
155.724ANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Wed Feb 23 1994 13:387
    Bob,
    
    Jill Trenery is originally from Minnetonka, MN and later moved to CO
    for school and training.
    
    
    Spud
155.725CanuckANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Wed Feb 23 1994 13:405
    BTW, whatever happened to Elizabeth Manly from Canada?  I didn't think
    she was too bad.  Not a bad skater, either.
    
    
    Spud
155.726I still got a crush on Dorothy Hamill..CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Wed Feb 23 1994 13:421
    
155.727 :*) GENRAL::WADEMy head's in MississippiWed Feb 23 1994 13:524
    
    	So what?  You still got a crush on Lou Holtz!
    
    Claybone
155.728GENRAL::WADEMy head's in MississippiWed Feb 23 1994 13:545
    
    	Hey Mr. Lazarus, not only is your memory starting to go, so are
    	your notes.  What happened to .716?
    
    Claybone
155.729METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Feb 23 1994 13:564
Trenary was 4th in one of the Olympics - 1988(?). She won the worlds one
year - might have been 1991

The Crazy Met
155.730clang,clang,clang go CBS' cash registersMETSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Feb 23 1994 14:056
CBS is predicting 100 million viewers for the Olympic coverage tonight.
Imagine what Friday will get if Harding-Kerrigan are in the top 3 after tonight.
Ratings in Boston are always very high when a local team is involved. Will
be fascinating to see how high the Boston ratings for tonight are.

The Crazy Met
155.731CSC32::M_MACGREGORWed Feb 23 1994 14:1726
    >When asked by Tracy Wilson what she'd heard from the judges, Torvell
    >said that she heard a rumor that they detracted for Dean lifting her over
    >his head.  
    
    Hmmm, does the word "rumor" mean anything to you.  I heard a rumor that
    MCI is going to buy us out, does that make it a fact?  I watched that with
    no sound (thus I can't say how they danced to the music or not, but I
    can also say the announcers had no influence on me, I hate announcers)
    and watched the event for what it was and not as a "can so and so win a
    medal"  In other words, I did not care who won, just wanted to see some
    good skating.
    
    T&D broke the rules, period.  The Russian pair broke the rules, period. 
    One appears to have been penalized while the other was not.  However, 
    all this aside, I really think that the couple that came in 4th (or maybe 
    it was 5th) was robbed of a medal.  They were the best pair that did not 
    break the rules and got lower scores anyway.
    
    Until the day comes where it can be judges objectively, it will always
    be argued about whom was best.  If you think about it, that is probably
    the strongest selling point for skating.  Each person has their own
    point of reference.  There is no definative scoring method which means
    more of the "non-sports" people will watch them to determine for
    themselves instead of just catching the highlights on the news.
    
    Marc
155.732Why isn't TNT carrying it live? ANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Wed Feb 23 1994 14:1814
    From what I've seen televised so far (which is very little) CBS does a
    mostly gab and show a few highlights type of coverage.  I get the idea
    that they string out the viewer as long as possible (even though the
    events have been over for about seven hours) and therefore have decided
    not to sit through their back-patting and series of commercials.  What
    I'm asking is a guess - based on what's happened so far as to when
    they'll show the skating highlights tonight?  Will it be right away at
    7pm or a few minutes here and we'll get back to you in an hour with the
    next girl?
    
    Thanks,
    
    
    Spud
155.733Glad they showed as much as they did...KALI::MORGANWed Feb 23 1994 14:236
    Actually, I was shocked last night at the amount of time devoted to the
    Mens 4 x 25K X-country.  Granted, it will go down in history as one of
    the greatest Olympix events of all time, but to have CBS show that much 
    action (without any US involvement, no less) was certainly a change.
    
    					Steve 
155.734Business not journalistic decisionMETSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Feb 23 1994 14:2414
Well if CBS uses the pattern otheres have used they will drag out the figure
skating all the way through the night with the top skaters being shown
between 10 and 11. They'll probably show Blair's race between 9 and 10.

TNT: well CBS paid $295 million for the right to show the games. TNT has
secondary coverage. They can generally show only what CBS will not be
showing in prime time; hockey coverage is an exception - at least to some
degree; TNT can show games live until the medal round - thatis weekend so 
CBS has that time anyway. CBS is doing what it can to maximize its ratings.
Ratings this year are up 35-40% from 1992 which was also a 6 hour time
difference from EST. Folks are watching even if they know the results. So
CBS keeps the best (or at least the most notorious/popular/etc.) for last.

The Crazy Met
155.735DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Wed Feb 23 1994 14:3211
    	Marc Macgregor said what I was going to say. Torvill and Dean
    	made a mistake. Gritchuk and Platov made a mistake. One pair
    	was penalized, the other not. And, before the final skate, there
    	had hardly been any movement up or down in ranking. After the
    	final skate, T&D are moved to third (exceptionally good job
    	of skating) and G&P are moved to first (so so job of skating).
    
    	No wonder Gritchuk started crying. She knew they did a so so
    	job and she expected to get a Bronze at best.
    
    	Scott
155.736DZIGN::ROBICHAUDBetterToDieOnYourFeetThanLiveOnYourKneesWed Feb 23 1994 14:4011
	>Now correct me if I'm wrong (like I gotta say that), but isn't this
	>the same ::SPROTS crowd who was totally flabergasted when Ice Skating
	>was determined to be the #1 'sport' watched on the tube?  This 
	>happened way before the 'Kerrigan clubbing'.  

	That survey was flawed Billl, the sampling was from the People's
Republic of Cambridge where figure skating, much like soccer is the
choice of the elite.  Had the sampling been taken in Dorchester, ice
hokey, 'rasslin or drive-by-shootings would've ranked #1.

				/Don
155.737HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Feb 23 1994 14:4033
Re Jill Trenary and some history leading up to the Nationals at Detroit.

  Jill Trenary was a member of the national team in the late '80s. Her big move
was a triple flip (You need at least one difficult triple to be competitive at
the international level.). She was on the '88 Olympic team and finised out of
the medals (somewhere around 6th). 

  After just about everyone else went pro, she won the world championship. I
believe it was '89 or '90, then went pro herself. 
    
  In '91, Toyna Harding landed her triple axle and won the U.S. championship,
Kristi Yamaguchi came in 2nd and Kerrigan came in 3rd. That year at the world
championships, Harding flubed her triple axle and Yamaguchi beat her but
the 3 U.S. women came in 1, 2, 3 anyway.

  In '92 they repeated going 1, 2, 3 in the Nationals and Yamaguchi won the
gold medal at the Olympics but this time Ito from Japan was back and won the
silver. Kerrigan beat Harding out for the bronze and Harding finished 4th
out of the medals. Yamaguchi repeated at the world championships a couple
months later.

  Yamaguchi and Ito then both went pro and last year (1993) Kerrigan lead the
U.S. team to the world championships in the Czech republic. I don't think
Harding even made the team. Kerrigan botched her long program and finished 5th
out of the medals which is why the U.S only has 2 skaters at the Olympics this
year. Had she won a medal, we would have had 3. 

  This year Harding got back into shape and she and Kerrigan went to Detroit
to skate in the nationals to compete for the 2 slots on the U.S. team. Kerrigan
was attacked before the match and didn't skate, Harding won, the USFS named
Kerrigan and Harding to the team and the rest is pretty well known.

  George
155.738MKFSA::LONGand you know they got a helluva band!Wed Feb 23 1994 14:4311
>>	That survey was flawed Billl, the sampling was from the People's
>>Republic of Cambridge where figure skating, much like soccer is the
>>choice of the elite.  Had the sampling been taken in Dorchester, ice
>>hokey, 'rasslin or drive-by-shootings would've ranked #1.

	So, what are you telling me, /er, that all the SPROTSfans in here
	are from Cambridge?


	billl
155.743Barry Olympic Update38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 16:3177
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject:In Norway, spunky and clinically insane are synonymous
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:08 EST
Message-ID:<S66e.5834@clarinet.com>

	LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- We have had our first semi-tragedy
of the Winter Olympics. What happened was, a Norwegian ski jumper
named "Ole Gunnar Fidjestol" (or, as his friends call him, "Ole
Gunnar Fidjestol") was practicing for his part in the opening
ceremonies, wherein he was going to go off of a ski jump WHILE
HOLDING A FLAMING TORCH. Really. The idea was that he would land
safely and then light the Olympic flame, which serves as a
dramatic and inspirational reminder of what happens when oxygen
combines rapidly with torch fuel.
	Unfortunately, during a practice a run, Ole -- perhaps you
have already heard about this -- was whacked in the knee by Tonya
Harding's bodyguard.
	No, seriously, he crashed and hurt himself and had to go
to the hospital. Wouldn't you like to have been there when he
explained this accident to his insurance company? ("You did WHAT?
Carrying a WHAT??")
	So anyway, Ole couldn't make the Flaming Torch Jump, and
the truly amazing thing is, THEY FOUND SOMEBODY ELSE WHO WAS
WILLING TO DO IT. That is the kind of spunky, by which I mean
clinically insane, people these Norwegians are.
	No, really, the Norwegians are great. I do not wish to
generalize, but they are all ruddy-complexioned, helpful,
efficient and unfailingly polite. Also, they all appear to be 22
years old. I don't know what happens to old Norwegians. Perhaps
their reflexes slow down and they get trampled by moose.
	There are a lot of moose here, even in the downtown
Lillehammer area. In fact, according to published reports that I
am not making up, the Norwegians spread wolf urine on the railroad
tracks to keep the moose away. This leads to the question: How do
you gather wolf urine? It would take an extremely spunky Norwegian
to do that. I bet that whenever flaming-torch-jumpers gather
together, they say, "Well, we may go off ski jumps holding
torches, but at least we don't collect urine from wolves. Those
guys are NUTS."
	Here are some other Norway Facts:
	FACT: The king of Norway is named "Harald."
	FACT: The Norwegian unit of currency is the "krone"
(plural: "kroner") with one krone being equal to an amount of
money that no two Americans can agree on or figure out even with
the aid of calculators. On the 100-kroner note is a picture of a
woman; according to Sissel Karlsen, a 22-year-old Norwegian who
works in the press center, this woman was "the sister of a very
famous Norwegian writer.',
	I asked Sissel how come the sister was on the currency, as
opposed to the famous writer.
	"I don't know," she said.
	Norway: Land Of Mystery.
	FACT: There is a LOT of snow here. According to the
Olympic news agency, there is a record 132 centimeters on the
ground. (To get an idea how much snow this is, just remember this
simple formula: One centimeter equals 17 kroner.) There are large
snowbanks all over the place, especially in the Media Village,
where many members of the press are staying and attempting to walk
back to at night after drinking a local beverage called
"aquavit," which is made from alcohol, enriched uranium and wolf
urine. Nobody knows how many people have fallen into these
snowbanks, but my guess is that come August, when the snowbanks
finally melt, the landscape will be littered with frozen
journalists, who, upon exposure to the sun, will thaw out and
immediately file expense reports. That is the kind of
professionals we are.

	In the other news: First lady Hillary Clinton is here to
meet the U.S. Olympic team and show off some lovely vacation homes
constructed by the Whitewater Development Corp. Also, do not quote
me on this, but I have been told by informed sources that the
actual Olympics per se have started. I will have more on this
important story if it involves Tonya Harding.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

155.744Bobsledding & Luge38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 16:3287
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject:Fear reigns on the bobsled and luge runs
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:17 EST
Message-ID:<S66e.583c@clarinet.com>

	(EDITOR'S NOTE: Due to technical difficulties, the
following column fails to mention Tonya Harding. We are working on
this and will correct it as soon as possible.)

	LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- I will admit that I was scared.
	My body was crammed uncomfortably inside the unforgiving,
spartan, cold-metal fuselage of a two-man Olympic bobsled. My
hands were clutching at two handles attached to ropes that were
supposed to steer this fiendish machine, which can reach speeds of
up to 90 mph as it hurtles down the bobsled-and-luge track, a
huge, menacing, surreal, snakelike sculpture of ice and concrete.
	"Scared" is not really the word for how I felt. I was
terrified. Only one thing kept me from losing control and
screaming hysterically and peeing in my thermal underwear, and
that was the knowledge that this particular bobsled was not,
technically, hurtling down the bobsled run. It was sitting
motionless on a level surface next to the bobsled-storage shed. So
I was unlikely to crash. But I still didn't like it.
	"Hey!" I said. "I'm stuck in here!"
	"It's not real comfortable," agreed Greg Sebald, helping
me climb out. Greg is the driver of this bobsled. He's a 30-year-
old patent attorney from Minneapolis, but he's representing Greece
in the Olympics. He can do this because (a) His mother is Greek,
so he has dual citizenship; and (b) "Minneapolis" is a Greek
name (it means, "City with a Greek name").
	Greg has been a bobsled driver for only two years. One day
he just decided to do it, so -- I am not making this up -- he
enrolled in bobsled-driving school, where he got a bobsled
license.
	(I don't know what happens if you go down the bobsled run
without a license. Perhaps you get pulled over by the Bobsled
Police.)
	Then he contacted the Greek Olympic Committee and arranged
to represent Greece, which is not a major world bobsled power.
Greg is driving a rental bobsled.
	"We had to give them a damage deposit," he told me.
	I asked him if he gets scared, going down the track.
"I'm scared every time," he said. "I'm especially
worried that, one of these days, I'm going to open my eyes."
	You have to admire this attitude. I think we should all
root for Greg, and, if we have invented anything, we should hire
him to obtain the patent for us, once the Olympics are over,
assuming he survives.
	Actually, I'm sure he'll do fine. The people I worry about
are the ones who compete in the luge event, which consists of
hurtling down the track at 80 miles per hour while lying backwards
on a "sled" that is about the size of a cafeteria tray.
	My guide to this event was Dmitry Feld, a stocky, bearded
man who is a coach and public-relations person for the U.S. luge
team. He started luging as a youth in the Soviet Union, coming to
the United States in 1978. He is an extremely outgoing person who
seems to be close personal friends with everybody in the world. It
takes him forever to walk anywhere because people are constantly
stopping him to shake his hand, hug him, etc. Reindeer come out of
the woods to lick him. If alien life forms ever land here, their
first words will be "Yo! Dmitry!"
	So anyway, during luge practice one day, Dmitry and I
stood at the bottom of the Olympic run while he explained the
sport to me.
	"You steer with leg and shoulder," he was saying. "You
try to be as aerodynamically as possible. Here he comes now.
Look."
	I turned toward the track and WHOOOOOOOSH this
thing went past, faster than you could say
"WHOOOOOOOSH," faster than you could see; all that registered
was a blue blur traveling at -- I am good at judging these things
-- the speed of light.
	"Lord," I said.
	"Yes," agreed Dmitry.
	I cannot adequately describe to you how scary the luge
event looks. Let me just say this: At the end of the run, there is
a long section that slants steeply uphill, so the sleds can slow
down. Try to imagine the fastest sled ride that you ever had. The
luge people go five times as fast as that UPHILL.
	I suggested to Dmitry that anybody who would do this had
to be a few utensils shy of a place setting. He shook his head.
	"We are not crazy people," he said. "We are just crazy
people who wants to win Olympic medal."
	Fair enough.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
155.745And you thought sitting in Foxborough was bad38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 16:3277
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject:Norway's professional bench-icers did their job
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:24 EST
Message-ID:<S66e.5844@clarinet.com>

	LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- In a moment, I will get to the
various Winter Olympic sporting events and how we in the news
media are not allowing them to be overshadowed by Tonya Harding.
But first, I want to tell you about the official opening ceremony,
which was a spectacular and dramatic event that I will remember at
least until my butt thaws out, which won't happen for a long, long
time. Twenty years from now, when I go in for a physical
examination, the doctor will say, "Mr. Barry, you seem to be
perfectly normal, except for the fact that your butt is minus 12
degrees Fahrenheit at the core."
	The problem was that the ceremony was held in a stadium
where the spectators sat for three hours on concrete benches
covered with a thick layer of ice. My guess is that the Norwegians
put the ice there on purpose. They probably had professional
bench-icers working all night, because these people LOVE the cold.
Even when it's really, REALLY cold, so cold that we visiting
journalists are afraid to blink for fear that our eyes will freeze
shut and we will be unable to fill out our expense reports, the
Norwegians are walking around outdoors practically naked, happy as
clams.
	Maybe it's their diet. It consists almost entirely of cold
food, mainly salmon, which seems to show up at every meal in
virtually every form, including ice cream, coffee, cigarettes,
etc. You know how in some hotels, the chambermaids leave you a
piece of chocolate? Well, the other day, the maids in the media
village here left -- I am not making this up -- little packets of
SALMON JERKY. This was in case you woke up at 2 a.m. thinking, as
so many people do, "Whoa, I have not consumed any salmon for SIX
HOURS!"
	So as you can imagine, after being here for a while, a
person can develop a fearsome case of salmon breath, which is
difficult to get rid of inasmuch as the Norwegians probably use
salmon-flavored toothpaste. Thus, no matter how cold it is,
everybody is happier outdoors.
	Everybody was certainly very happy at the opening
ceremony. One highlight, of course, was the arrival, via ski-
jumper, of the Olympic torch, which had spent the past few months
traveling around visiting various historic sites, holding press
conferences, signing endorsement deals, appearing on Letterman,
etc. The torch was impressive, but -- as is so often the case when
you finally see a famous torch in person -- it was not as tall as
I expected. For me, the most dramatic moment in the ceremonies was
when a whole bunch of Norwegians came skiing like lunatics down a
steep hill and, in mid-slope, turned somersaults WHILE CARRYING
FIDDLES. It was amazing. I'd like to see Somersault Fiddle Skiing
become a regular Olympic event. In fact, I think an effort should
be made to involve other instruments; I would pay a lot of money
to see the Piano Ski Jump.
	But moving on to the Olympic games themselves: We here in
the U.S. news media are all SICK AND TIRED of the whole Tonya
Harding thing, and we are doing our level best not to let it
overshadow the athletic events. Some of us have even taken the
extreme step of actually talking to athletes other than Nancy
Kerrigan (Yes! There are some!).
	"So," we ask these athletes. "What do YOU think of this
Tonya Harding thing?"
	Also there has been a major new development on the wolf-
urine front. You may recall that in an earlier column I stated
that, according to reports published in a publication that shall
remain nameless (Sports Illustrated), the Norwegians were putting
wolf urine on the railroad tracks here to repel moose. Well, I
have here a Dallas Morning News report stating that (1) They are
NOT moose, they are elk; and (2) The Norwegians are NOT using wolf
urine to repel them. They are using salmon urine.
	No, seriously, they claim they are not using any kind of
urine at all. I will continue to monitor this story and provide
you with updates as warranted. I also plan to look into published
reports here that the cheese slicer was invented by a Norwegian.
Don't thank me: I'm just trying to avoid doing my job.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
155.74638346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 16:3378
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject:Journalists wisely stay indoors to cover events at the winter olympics
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:33 EST
Message-ID:<S66e.584c@clarinet.com>

	LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- Picture this: Thousands of
Norwegians are gathered outdoors at the base of a mountain on a
bright but bitterly cold morning. They are waiting for the
downhill skiing event. Many of them are standing on little mats
set in the snow. They have been standing here for hours, in the
cold. Normal people would be dead by now, but these are
Norwegians. They have eaten a hearty breakfast of cold salmon
slices topped with slices of cold salmon, and now they are out in
the frigid air, and they could not be happier.
	There is a powerful public-address system, which is
blasting, at high volume, the song "Achy Breaky Heart," by Billy
Ray Cyrus. The Norwegians love this. They are bouncing up and down
on their mats in time to the music.
	"Don't break my heart," Billy Ray is singing, "my achy
breaky heart ..." And thousands of bodies bounce joyously up and
down, Norwegians getting down and funky.
	Meanwhile, way way waaaaaaay up on the top of the
mountain, crazy people are waiting. They are called "downhill
skiers," although this is not an accurate term, because the
"hill" is not really a hill at all, but what a normal person
would call a "cliff." These people are basically falling from a
tremendous height with skis attached to their feet. In a few
years, this event probably will evolve to the point where the
competitors no longer even bother with skis; they'll just climb to
the top of a 2,000-foot tower, and, one by one, they'll jump off
and see who can form his body into the most aerodynamic shape and
splat into the ground the fastest. This would be an extremely
popular Nordic sport.
	But even with skis, the downhill is one of the most
dramatic Winter Olympic events, and many of us journalists are on
hand for the purpose of not looking directly at it. We leave that
to the Norwegians. What we do is watch the event on TV inside the
press building, which, by the way, is heated. That's right: We
journalists ride in buses for an hour to get to this event, and
then we watch it on TV. The reason for this is that, if we go
outside, we can see only the very last part of the run, plus we
could freeze to death with the sounds of Billy Ray Cyrus echoing
in our brains. So we wisely remain inside and stare at the TV,
following the progress of the competitors as they fall down the
cliff. Every now and then, when a competitor gets near the bottom,
we glance out the window, and in the distance we can see the skier
in the form of a colorful little dot hurtling down the side of the
mountain, causing the Norwegians to cheer and jump up and down on
their mats.
	Perhaps you are asking yourself why, if we journalists are
just going to watch the event on TV anyway, we bother going all
the way out to the downhill course. Why not just stay back in the
main press center and watch it on TV from there? Or, better yet,
why not just stay home and watch it from the security of the
United States, which is also equipped with television and, as a
bonus, does not have the same basic climate as a tank of liquid
nitrogen? In fact, why not go to a REALLY warm place, such as
Tahiti, and cover the Winter Olympics from there?
	The answer is: If we did that, we would not be able to
give you all these insights into the Norwegian culture. Here's one
I had yesterday: They don't just eat salmon here. They also eat
reindeer. I had a sector of reindeer for dinner, and it wasn't
bad. I would say it tasted kind of like salmon.

    WOLF-URINE UPDATE: This story just gets more and more
complicated. According to Hugin, the official newspaper of the
Olympic Games, the Norwegians ARE, in fact, using "chemically
produced wolf urine" to keep moose off the train tracks.
	BONUS WOLF-URINE FACT: In the French version of the story,
"wolf urine" is translated -- I am not making this up -- as
"pipi de loup."
	TONYA HARDING UPDATE: Under an agreement reached with the
U.S. Olympic Committee, Miss Harding will be allowed to compete in
the Men's Bobsled event.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

155.74738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 23 1994 16:3382
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject:Exposing Tonya, reporters' real interest
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 94 15:07:43 EST
Message-ID:<S66e.5854@clarinet.com>

	LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- In a moment I will be bringing you
an exclusive photograph of Tonya Harding naked with a reindeer,
but first we have this news bulletin concerning:

	BOBSLEDDERS ON DOPE
	According to the official Olympic news agency, the driver
of the Austrian two-man bobsled team was sent home because he
"tested positive in anti-doping control." This is extremely
alarming news, because it seems to suggest that there might be
bobsled competitors here who are NOT on dope. Let me just state
that I, personally, would not consider going down a bobsled run
unless huge quantities of narcotics were coursing through my
bloodstream. If I were on the bobsled team, I would carry a
syringe in my uniform so I could give myself additional dope
injections on the way down.
	I want to stress, however, that I am not putting dangerous
substances of any kind into my body, other than mass quantities of
Norwegian beer, because I want to remain alert now that Tonya
Harding is finally here. We in the American news media are so
happy about this that we want to hurl our hats into the air, but
of course we don't, because our hair would freeze solid and break
off like No. 8 spaghetti.
	We are crazy mad in love with this story. We were bored to
death with watching Olympic sporting events such as the Men's 10
Kilometer Alpine Uphill Snow Shoveling. We are not here to cover
winter sports: We are here for Human Interest, by which I mean,
dirt. We also like tragedy. If we had our way, the Olympic
athletes would be selected solely on the basis of having extremely
tragic and/or depraved lives, and they'd never actually engage in
athletic competition. They'd just stand around the media center
and let us do Human Interest stories on how they had managed to
become Olympic biathlon contenders despite being born with four
stomachs, or whatever.
	That is why we love the Tonya Harding story so much, and 
-- admit it -- so do you. And that is why, as I promised at the
beginning of the column, I am pleased to present the following
EXCLUSIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF TONYA HARDING NAKED WITH A REINDEER.
	(Note to Editor: Please insert the exclusive photograph
here. For caption purposes, please note that Miss Harding is the
one on the right.)
	I have not yet seen Tonya Harding in person, because for
security reasons she is surrounded at all times by a dense, 400-
foot thick protective layer of journalists. I did, however, see
Nancy Kerrigan. She was sitting with her agent in the audience of
the pairs figure-skating competition. (Yes! There are figure
skaters here besides Nancy and Tonya! I was shocked.) I did not
actually interview Miss Kerrigan, but I would say, just judging
from the back of her head, that she was relaxed but apprehensive,
as well as hopeful, yet striving to remain focused on the task
ahead. Or maybe that was the agent.
	Pairs figure skating is a very dramatic event. It consists
of two people: a tiny, relentlessly perky woman wearing a cute
little costume with lots of beads and sequins; and a large, strong
man, who has to wear a costume that matches the woman's, so he
looks like a complete twink out there. You can tell he's really
ticked off about this, because every 30 seconds or so, when
they've built up a good head of steam on the ice, he hauls off and
throws the woman as far as she can, which is pretty darned far,
because most of these women are no heavier than a box of breakfast
cereal. Sometimes the woman falls down when this happens, but she
always jumps right back up and skates perkily back toward the man.
	"DON'T DO IT!" you want to shout at her. "HE'S JUST
GOING TO THROW YOU AGAIN!"
	And sure enough he does. Finally, he becomes exhausted and
stops; then the judges hold up numbers indicating how far they
estimate the woman traveled, in meters, on the best toss. The
Russians always win this event. There will come a time, within our
lifetimes, when a Russian male skater will throw a Russian female
skater completely out of the rink. This is the four-minute mile of
the sport.

	IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: We regret that due to the Tonya
Harding situation, there will be no update today on the wolf-urine
story.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
155.748I'm slippingCTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Wed Feb 23 1994 16:5315
>>         Mike, we're trying to hold an intelligent conversation about
>>         that greatest of all sports, Ice Dancing. There's no reason to
>>         be bashing me just because I tend to get rather passionate
>>         when discussing the intricasies of La Belle Danse Sur Glace.
>>
             I think youowe me an apology.    
    
         I apologize because there's no reason to bash you just because you
    tend to get rather passionate when discussing the intracacies of
    La Belle Danse Sur Glace (Cada Mia Tish.. that's French!) and this is
    a very weak example of BrydieSpeak and I will leave you alone until
    I see vintage.
    
    MikeL
    
155.750See redsox note for plenty of itAKOCOA::BREENWed Feb 23 1994 17:487
    >having some guy insist "yeh, they didn't get runs but they should of 
    >won anyway, heck they had more baserunners." How do you argue with 
    >something like that 
    %
    This is called redsox talk - we've been doing this for the entire lou
    gorman reign, in fact for my entire life which tcm will tell you is a
    long time.
155.751STRATA::HUIWed Feb 23 1994 18:4322
Yeah!, How about the Canadian who would have gotten the Bronze in the 1000
meter because they disqualified the British racer for interference but 
since he did not finish the race because he fell. They gave it to another 
canadian who won the "B" divison race.

Tell me he is not hitting himself in the head.

I think the shorter guy has the advantage in the short track even.

As for the Ice Dancing, I notice Tracy Wilson also shown the gold medal pairs
doing some illegal moves (Separation for more then 5 seconds twice and
supporting the weight of the female skater when she had his knees in his 
chest). The rule written in black ane white and the judges are suppose to 
deduct .3 for each violation. I did see any 5.1, 5.3, or 5.7 in their 
technical scoring. 
    
                                             
HUEY



155.752Go Team CanadaJUNCO::BOLDENThu Feb 24 1994 09:1919
    
    
    I am not surpised the USA hockey team got crushed by the Finns.
    The USA has the speed but the forwards and defensemen seemed awfully 
    small compared to the Finns. They never control the neutral ice 
    area at all from what I saw. I believe their youth and inexperience
    got the best of them. Anyway the Finns looked pretty good themselves.
    
    
    
    Oh, I have not watched CBS at all. I will not give them the pleasure
    of watching their commercials, fluff pieces, tabloid TV,
    sensationalism, picknannie journalism, whatever other s*** and their
    5 minutes of sport actions! Not for me, man.  And I thank you.
    
    
    Craig
    
     
155.753Poor, poor job as usual CBSANGLIN::WIERSBECKGolden Gopher hoops!Thu Feb 24 1994 12:0810
    Yeah, just think, it only took CBS over 2 1/2 hours to get to
    Kerrigan's routine.  I caught the skaters and Bonnie Blair, otherwise I
    was catching the Bulls or watching a tape of a '78 World Series game.
    Blah, blah, blah, commercial X infinite, blah, blah, blah, highlight
    (oops, how'd that get in there?) blah, commercial x infinite...
    
    How they keep viewers, I don't know.
    
    
    Spud
155.754CBC feed liveOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Feb 24 1994 12:474
    A lot of sports bars with satellite dishes got the CBC feed and
    broadcasted the skating live. Mike and the Mad Dog had the same feed 
    and commented how great it was to just watch
    sport,nocommercials,no fluff.
155.75538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 24 1994 12:484
155.756TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Thu Feb 24 1994 12:4911
Heard this morning, third-hand,
that 2 skaters (2nd place Baiul and 5th place
Szewczenko) collided in practice this a.m.
Both were skating backwards full tilt.
Baiul cut her leg, Szewczenko had to be carried
off.  I was waiting for the Tonya punchline that
never came.
Anybody else hear this?

dr.a
155.757METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Feb 24 1994 13:206
Szewczenko came back on the ice for a very short time.
Baiul needed 5 stitches.

No word on whether they will be able to skate tomorrow night.

The Crazy Met
155.758Cross Country Skiing38346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 24 1994 13:3479
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject:Norwegian Super Bowl
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 13:15:12 EST
Message-ID:<S673.5cc1@clarinet.com>

	LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- I went to see cross country skiing,
an Olympic event that -- talk about your poor planning -- was held
OUTDOORS. This was very unfortunate, because the weather, in
defiance of the known laws of physics, has gotten even colder. You
have to walk very carefully for fear of tripping over body parts
that have fallen off of visiting journalists without their
noticing it. It is so cold that the Norwegians won't tell us the
real temperature; they are using a secret temperature code, called
"centigrade."
	It was approximately 740 kilometers below zero when I
arrived at the cross country ski stadium, which was, needless to
say, jammed with thousands of happy Norwegians, bouncing up and
down, ringing cowbells, blowing horns and emitting cheerful puffs
of salmon breath into the frigid air. Some of them had been there
all night. They LOVE cross country skiing. This is a huge event
for them, very much like our Super Bowl, except that at the Super
Bowl, you can actually see the game.
	This is not the case with cross country skiing. You do
catch a brief glimpse of the skiers at the start; they take off
one at a time, 30 seconds apart, wearing their aerodynamic Spider
Man outfits, while the crowd roars insanely. But the skiers
immediately ski OUT OF THE STADIUM. Just like that, they're GONE,
possibly to Sweden, and sometimes they don't come back for hours.
It's as if you were at a football game, and on the opening
kickoff, the player who caught the ball sprinted out the stadium
exit, with all the other players running right behind him, and you
spent the rest of the game ringing a cowbell and waiting for them
to come back.
	Speaking of freezing to death: I have formulated an
alarming new theory as to why the Norwegians do not seem to notice
the cold: they are eating radioactive reindeer. Really. According
to the Norway Tribune, an English-language newspaper here, there
is still a lot of radioactive material that drifted over after the
Chernobyl nuclear accident, and it is showing up in the reindeer
meat, thus giving a whole new meaning to the famous song lyrics:
	"And if you ever saw it,
	"You would even say it glows."
	And speaking of scary animals, there has been a:
	MAJOR NEW DEVELOPMENT IN THE WOLF-URINE STORY
	I have now been in contact with TWO high-level Norwegian
State Railways officials in regards to this fast-breaking story,
which is threatening to overshadow even -- Dare I say it? -- Tonya
Harding. According to a maintenance official named Knut Langballe,
the Norwegians are NOT, contrary to published reports, merely
using synthetic wolf urine to repel moose from their railroad
tracks; they are using a synthetic MIXTURE, which simulates wolf
urine, lynx urine and -- get ready -- WOLVERINE urine. I swear I
am not making this up. These people are truly on the cutting edge
of moose-repellent science.
	Langballe did not reveal the exact chemical formula, which
is probably a Norwegian state secret. But he did state, for the
record, that "it smells really bad."
	I can vouch for this. After I spoke with Langballe, a
photographer and I met in downtown Lillehammer with Arild Vollan,
information director for the state railways, who brought a small
plastic tube of moose repellent with him and let us actually sniff
it. All I can say is this: If we had dropped this stuff on
Baghdad, Saddam Hussein would be a distant memory today.
	In addition to the moose repellent, Norwegian State
Railways tracks moose by helicopter and radios their locations to
Moose Command Central. Despite these efforts, more than 300 moose
have been hit by trains so far this winter, often causing
considerable damage to the locomotives.
	"Also," stated Langballe,  "the moose gets minced."
	I don't wish to be an alarmist, but it seems to me that,
sooner or later, one of these locomotives is bound to ram at full
speed into one of these atomic reindeer, and the entire Nordic
region is going to be engulfed in a giant fireball. That's the bad
news. The good news is, we would be warmer.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED  BY  TRIBUNE  MEDIA  SERVICES,   INC.


155.760HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 24 1994 14:1545
  With Baiul's health now in question, Kerrigan's chances of winning have
improved dramatically. When Baiul skates her best performance no one can beat
her long program without something like a triple axle but if she's injured that
opens the door to the rest of the field. 

  The way the scoring works in Figures, if any of Kerrigan, Oksana Baiul, or
Surya Bonaly win the long program, they should the gold medal. Kerrigan or
Baiul would win it outright and Bonaly would win outright if she won and
Kerrigan finished lower than 2nd. If Bonaly and Kerrigan came in 1, 2 then they
would be tied and I believe that the long program is the tie breaker so Bonaly
would win. 

  Kerrigan is normally strong in the short program and weak in the long. At
last years World Championship she appeared headed for a gold metal after the
short program then fell apart during the long program ending up 5th, but
lately she has been skating the long program better than she's ever skated it
before. 

  Suray Bonaly is also in great shape right about now and if she lands her quad
and skates clean that might be enough. Without it, her artistic score even
though much improved could still keep her off the top of the podium. 

  Chen Lu (or Lu Chen, depending on who's doing the reporting) is also in good
shape in 4th place. If she wins the long program she'll only have 3.0 points
which would beat anyone straight out except for Kerrigan or Baiul in 2nd place.
Kerrigan could beat Chen Lu or anyone lower from 2nd, Baiul would lose to Chen
Lu from 2nd in a tie breaker. 

  The chances of Toyna Harding winning the gold metal are extremely remote.
With 5.0 points, even if she wins the long program everyone else would have to
have 6.0 or more points for Harding to win. That means that Kerrigan would have
to be no better than 6th, Baiul and Bonaly no better than 5th, Chen Lu no
better than 4th, and so on. The chances of all that happening are pretty
remote. 

  Another major factor is that in the long program there are no mandatory
deductions for missing elements. If a skater misses a jump the only penalties
are that it takes a little off artistic impression and they don't get the
points it would have given them. They can often make those points up with other
jumps. 

  Unless Baiul makes a dramatic recovery, things look pretty good for a win by
Nancy, but I'll stick with my dark horse prediction of Chen Lu.

  George 
155.762Tonya was robbed, Nancy was almost boringFRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Thu Feb 24 1994 14:3224
    The Ukranian received 3 stitches according to ESPN.  
    
    If you are to be fair and impartial, you have to admit that Tonya was
    robbed.  There's no way her technical program scores deserved to be
    that much lower than her artistic program.  Her technical program had
    some 4.8's and 5.0's in it, while the artistic was dominated by 5.2's
    and 5.3's.  She should be around 6th or 7th instead of 10th. 
    Unfortunately, the sympathy votes Kerrigan received were deducted from
    Tonya.  This points out another serious problem with opinionated
    scoring.
    
    Nancy was flawless and seem to play it safe, almost to the point of
    being boring.  She didn't push it or attempt any unusually challenging
    moves to this casual observer.
    
    My favorite of the night was Bonaly of France (currently 3rd).  She was 
    very athletic, energetic, flawless, and pulled off some real tough moves.   
    Going into the splits on the run like she did at the end of her 
    performance was incredible.  After Elvis (only error-free men's
    performer) was robbed in the men's competition for not being
    conservative in the judges' eyes, you have to wonder if they're racists
    too.
    
    Mike
155.765MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Feb 24 1994 14:3819
    George, Bonaly can also win it outright no matter what Kerrigan does
    
    Kerrigan .5
    Baiul   1.0
    Bonalu  1.5
    
    after the short program.
    
    Assume Bonaly wins the long and Kerrigan is second
    
    Bonaly 1.5 + 1 = 2.5
    Kerrigan .5 + 2.0 = 2.5 
    
    Tie breaker is the long program so Bonaly gets the gold. that is
    why being 1,2, or 3 is so critical - those skaters can win the gold by
    winning the long program. All other skaters need help.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.766MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Thu Feb 24 1994 14:394
    But Harding seemed to get .5-.6 deductions.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.767FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Thu Feb 24 1994 14:434
    Re: George & TCM
    
    Exactly!  6 - .6 = 5.4, not the 4.8 or 5.0 which she had at least 2 of
    each.
155.768CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Thu Feb 24 1994 15:0020
    Maybe it's me, but Harding looked anything but smooth out there.
    She didn't really hit anything of note. I too thought her marks were
    a tad low, but only .2.. A 5.1 or 5.2 woulda been right.
    
    Kerigan looked flawless. I saw nothing "easy" about her program.
    Paul Wylie said that Kerrigan's short program had difficuly
    step manuevers (whatever that means) and was not easy at all.
    
    Some other skater (Hamilton) mentioned that a lot of jumps
    (Bonaly maybe) look much more difficult than they really are.
    
    And both Wylie and Hamilton wondered why the UK judge gave
    Kerrigan two 5.6's and gave a 5.9 to the Ukrainian when
    she clearly botched a landing..
    
    Ah judging, who knows what lurks in the minds...
    
    MikeL, another who doesn't really understand the scoring system
    (only high school scoring).
    
155.76938346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 24 1994 15:0119
155.771btw - good luck nancy and team canadaAKOCOA::BREENPC comes to UK,Travis Ford the victimThu Feb 24 1994 15:1813
    I remarked that las vegas had a line on figure skating - a sprot
    entirely decided by judgine and got an answer "So's boxing".
    
    With Whitaker-Chavez still fresh I tried to explain "at least a
    knockout can occur".
    
    But ballroom dancing - much more of a "sport" than figure skating and
    better athletes.
    
    I had a chart on all this from last spring.
    
    I was going to watch this last night and even saw tonya but with the
    long drawn out program I was long gone before nk.
155.772HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Feb 24 1994 15:3516
RE            <<< Note 155.767 by FRETZ::HEISER "shut up 'n' jam!" >>>

>    Re: George & TCM
>    
>    Exactly!  6 - .6 = 5.4, not the 4.8 or 5.0 which she had at least 2 of
>    each.

  But they weren't starting from 6.0 when they made the mandatory deductions.
She had already lost some points for skating as if she had led weights in her
feet. 

  If you check her presentation scores which were in the mid 5's, subtract .4
for the two mandatory deductions you end up around 5.0, 5.1 which is about what
she got for her technical scores. 

  George
155.77438346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 24 1994 15:404
155.77538346::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 24 1994 15:462
    If an Olympic event prepares you for a career in Disney on Ice, does it
    qualify as a sport?
155.776TNPUBS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Thu Feb 24 1994 18:347
Actually, I got dragged to Disney's Alladin on Ice
last weekend.  They had these Russians launching each other off
springboards, doing flips, and landing in chairs atop poles.
Kinda cool.  And, George, I think you're getting your
chain yanked again.

dr.a
155.778MKFSA::LONGand you know they got a helluva band!Fri Feb 25 1994 16:068
	Ok, George, if it will make you feel beter, I know absolutly
	nothing about figure skating.  (Feel better, now?)

	What is a "double flip"?  It apparently is not the same as a 
	double flip in gymnastics floor exercise.


	billl
155.779CSC32::M_MACGREGORFri Feb 25 1994 16:0719
    
    George,
    
    >If you check her presentation scores which were in the mid 5's,
    >subtract .4 for the two mandatory deductions you end up around 5.0, 
    >5.1 which is about what she got for her technical scores.
    
    I'm really surprised.  For someone who is so knowledgable in this
    arena, how could you make a fundamental mistake like this one?  There
    is no direct correlation between the technical score and the
    presentation score, NONE.  Either score can be higher and there are
    thousands of examples in history to demonstrate this observation.  The
    formula for Techinal score is NOT  Presentation - Mandatory Deductions.
    
    You had me convinced that you knew what you were talking about, but now
    you are losing credibility.  Care to try that one again?
    
    Marc
    
155.780And now for a double toe loop!AIMHI::KERRCurse Of The Box PeopleFri Feb 25 1994 16:168
    Re: .778
    
    "Double Flip" =  Presenting two "strategic" fingers to other drivers on
    		     Rt. 128
    
    :-)
    
    
155.78238346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 25 1994 17:191
    Yah, right George.  It's hard to fight logic like that.
155.784I think Tonya's practicing voodooCTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 17:335
    So is the Ukranian Flapper, Osaka Baio, going to skate or is
    her wrenched back gonna scratch her?
    
    MikeL
    
155.786jump summaryPACKED::COLLIS::JACKSONDCU fees? NO!!!Fri Feb 25 1994 17:3557
Impress your friends (and yourself)!  Recognize all 6 different
jumps skaters do (not including back flips which are illegal in
competition [and not all that hard to do anyway]):

There are 6 jumps in skating:

	loop (left leg free, does not touch ice)
	toe loop (left leg used to jump off of)
	salchow (right leg used to jump off of, outside edge)
	flip (right leg used to jump off of, inside edge)
	axle (skater going forward into jump)
	lutz (right leg free, does not touch ice)

Explanations assume counter-clockwise spins.
All jumps land on right foot outside edge going backwards.

	axle - only jump you start go forward, hence takes an
               extra half spin to complete (therefore considered
               the most difficult jump)  Start on left outer edge.


	loop - start on right outer edge going backwards; left leg
               swung around to start jump

	toe loop - same as loop except left foot planted on ice for
                   to jump off of.  Easiest jump to complete.

	flip/salchow - almost the same jump.  Skating backwards on
                       left leg, the right skate is planted to jump off
                       of.  The only difference is the edge of the left
                       skate before the plant - if it was an inner edge
                       (skater leaning on the inside of the left skate),
                       it's a flip; an outer edge and it's a salchow
		       Flip is considered easier since you are leaning
                       the same way as the jump will take you.

        lutz - start on left outer edge going backwards, right leg
               swung around to start jump.  Same as loop except uses
               opposite legs.  This is the second most difficult jump.

In summary:

 skating going forward?  AXLE

 Second jump of a combination?  TOE LOOP

 Left skate planted for jump?  TOE LOOP

 Right skate planted for jump?  Probably a FLIP, possibly SALCHOW (both
                                syllables are OU as in OUCH)

 Skater jumps without planting a foot?  Probably a LOOP (skating on right
                                        foot), possibly a LUTZ (skating on
                                        left foot)

 Skater does a triple axle?  Must be watching men's competition (or Tonya
                             of a good day).  :-)
155.787tuff neighborhoodGENRAL::WADEMy head's in MississippiFri Feb 25 1994 17:386
    
    	Rat on Tommy.  Where I went to school, pickup boxing matches
    	were everywhere.  :*)
    
    Claybone
    
155.790Hey, maybe in Finlandia, or Sveden...CSC32::GAULKEFri Feb 25 1994 17:4652
    
    
    >>I've always thought it was a good rule of thumb that if in doubt about
    >>whether it's sport or not, ask yourself if kids play it as a pickup game.
    
      
    
    In my best 8 yr. old scratch voice:
    
     kid1:  Hi guys, what's up?
    
     kid2:  ahh, nuthin, just wunderin what to do today..
    
     kid3:  yeah, wanna play somethin?
    
     kid1: I know!! Let's do a 30k biathlon relay, that oughtta be fun!!
    
     kid3: Yeah!! I'll go tell my mom!!
    
     kid2: ok, me too. see ya in 5 minutes...
    
    ......
    
    
    Anyway, it might be an old commercial for pizza hut or somethin,
     but it starts out with various shots of a basketball court, 
    close ups of mean faces, then a voice saying:
    
      "Ya gotta have heart"  (somebody sweatin)
    
      "Ya gotta have desire" (another guy doin pullups on a 
    			      backboard support)
    			     
    
      Then it goes on with other shots of the faces, some closeups of
    some biceps, then the voice.
    
      "ya gotta have the ball"
    
     the camera pans 6 or 7 guys, saying:
    
      you got the ball?
    
      no, you got the ball?
    
     where's the ball??
    
       etc. etc. etc.
    
     pretty funny..
    
    
155.793never thought I'd stoop this lowFRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Fri Feb 25 1994 18:052
    I can't believe I'm listening to Tonya skating on the radio.  Some
    interesting drama is going on though.
155.794?CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 18:067
    Well spill this interesting drama..!! We needs a play by play main(in da
    form feed note)..
    
    
    MikeL
    
    
155.796CSC32::GAULKEFri Feb 25 1994 18:385
    
    
     I heard Jake tried to do a Bolero but he choked on it.
    
    
155.797-1, Priceless!! I'm choking!! (er careful)CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 18:421
    
155.798DZIGN::ROBICHAUDDieOnYourFeet&gt;LiveOnYourKneesFri Feb 25 1994 18:4411
	I'm proud to say I haven't watched one minute of any figure skating 
sport the last couple of weeks.  I didn't care about skating a few months 
ago and I refused to let CNN/CBS and the MilitaryIndustrialComplex 
determine what is or isn't "in".  Tonight at 8 P.M. I want you to get out 
of your living room chairs, I want you to go over to your window, I want 
you to open the window, stick your head out and scream "I'm mad as hell, 
and I'm not going to take it anymore!".  Refuse to watch these pristine 
primadonnas smugly glide along the ice.  Strike a blow for individualism and 
liberty!

				/Don
155.799Very few have sat out CBSOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Feb 25 1994 18:493
    I agree with you . I've hardly watched any of the manipu;ation,but
    we're in the deep minority.
    
155.80038346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 25 1994 18:502
    I'm with Slasher.  I'm sending the wife upstairs to watch TV while I
    watch Brisco County Jr.
155.8018^)CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 18:515
    -1,
    Now there's a life full of richness...
    
    MikeL
    
155.802Thank goodness no more figureskating for foiur yearsTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeFri Feb 25 1994 18:5410
    Bad news - Brisco County Jr. is pre-empted tonight!!!!!!  :-(
    
    I was planning on watching Brisco myself!!!
    
    Guess I'll have to pop in the tape of the UMass-Temple game from lasted
    night and relive the glory all over again!!!  I also have the Cal-UCLA
    game, which is worth watching for the incredible show by the great
    Jason Kidd and the comeback by UCLA.
    
    NAZZ
155.803Take these skaters and shove it...MKFSA::LONGand you know they got a helluva band!Fri Feb 25 1994 18:569
	I got an even better idear, /er.  By 8:00 I'll be at the Legion 
	chasing away that wintery cottonmouth.  Before I go in I'm going
	to disconnect the cable so's nobody will be tempted to watch any
	of that rubbish.  I'll put some good ol' Johnny Paycheck on the
	jukebox, and care less which one of them "pristine primadonnas"
	whacks/falls/collides!


	billl
155.8058^)CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 19:037
    OH OH,
    
    Eveeryone stay clear of the legion tonight,. Serious sport, darting,
    is on the agenda.. Keep yer wimmen and children locked up..
    
    MikeL
    
155.807PTOVAX::JACOBI lift, you grab. ...Fri Feb 25 1994 19:0723
    
    
>> 			I'll put some good ol' Johnny Paycheck on the
>>	jukebox, and care less which one of them "pristine primadonnas"
>>	whacks/falls/collides!                                         
    
    Hey billlllllllll,
    
    How many Country Western peoples does it take to change a light bulb???
    
    
    5...
    
    1 to change the bulb
    
    
    And 4 to sing about the old one.
    
    Schnortttt Schitttt Schlepppps
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.808One can only hopeTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeFri Feb 25 1994 19:087
    AAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Say it ain't so!!!  Perhaps Harding will be on trial by then, and the
    judge won't let her leave the county to skate!  And maybe Nancy will go
    pro and pass up the worlds.
    
    Nazz
155.809tick tock tick tockCTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 19:108
    That's OK, NAZZ, patience me main..
    Pretty soon it'll be GGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLL time,
    and the soccer-ignorant will be saying
    AAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHH!!
    
    MikeL
    
              
155.810I'll be at Foxboro for Bolivia/South KoreaTNPUBS::NAZZAROBruno Kirby: Cop on the EdgeFri Feb 25 1994 19:1315
    No Mike - go got it wrong.  Hundreds of millions of soccer fans around
    the world will scream in one voice:
    
    GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
    GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
    OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Ah cain't wait!
    
    NAZZ
155.811CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Fri Feb 25 1994 19:157
    So sorry NAZZ,
    
    Can I do it over? See I just got this Tonya-like asthma attack and
    got cut short.....
    
    MikeL
    
155.812Cain't wait for lots of good soccer talk in here!TNPUBS::NAZZAROGOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!Fri Feb 25 1994 19:213
    That's OK Mike.  You still have more than three months to practice!
    
    NAZZ
155.814FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Fri Feb 25 1994 19:241
    Yeah, soccer players have no sticks.
155.815Continuing to enlighten soccer illiteratesTNPUBS::NAZZAROGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!!Fri Feb 25 1994 19:263
    But almost every soccer player still has all his teeth.
    
    NAZZ
155.816FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Fri Feb 25 1994 19:271
    you don't need a cup either if you don't have a stick.
155.81738346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 25 1994 19:319
155.819WTF is a Brisco County Jr.?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Fri Feb 25 1994 20:000
155.82138346::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 25 1994 20:072
    Hey Tommy, sounds like either You & I or George will be making a trip
    to the Crow Cafe in March.  Frankly, I like our chances.
155.822HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Feb 25 1994 20:2012
  Not a chance, the way I look at it

Figure Skating Spoiler


  I was close enough with my call for the final standings that and won't be
eating crow for quite a while.

  I believe I picked all 3 people on the podium, I just had Chen Lu at the
wrong end. 

  George
155.823My view of the elephant.CSC32::GAULKEFri Feb 25 1994 20:2812
155.824Last night's short track speed skatingCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Fri Feb 25 1994 20:4326
What do fellow noters think of Kathy Turner's performance in the
short track speed skating?  She was 

 1) accused by the Canadian skater, who was disqualified, for
	interfering with her in the semi-finals.  This was when
	the Canadian skater tried to pass on the inside and resulted
	in 3 skaters hitting the ice.  The Canadian was DQ'ed and
	the race was re-skated.

 2) accused of interference by the Chinese skater in the final.  This
	was when she passed the Chinese skater on the outside.  As
	she was doing this, she did touch the Chinese skater with
	her arm.  The Chinese skater claims that she grabbed her
	and interfered with her, and was very ungracious in defeat.

Over in Soapbox (yeah, I know.  Who cares?), there's quite a discussion
going on about this.  One Canadian noter is really PO'ed about it,
and figures that Turner is a dirty skater.  Apparently, that opinion
is shared by other non-American people.

So waddya think?  Is she a dirty skater, or just aggressive.  Did
she interfere, or was it just incidental contact.  And does the 
Canadian skater have any grounds for her claim that Turner interfered
with her, and not the other way around?

Jerry 
155.825Travis Ford must be real proud of Kathy TurnerAKOCOA::BREENFri Feb 25 1994 20:461
    
155.826CSC32::GAULKEFri Feb 25 1994 20:5411
    
    
     
    
    
    
     I didn't see it, but if she didn't use a club it's no big deal!!
    
    
    
    
155.827HANNAH::ASHEOne of the sweethearts at DigitalFri Feb 25 1994 21:482
    I thought the final wasn't as bad as perhaps the semi's.   Hard to say,
    CBS didn't give as good a shot of it as they could have.  
155.831talk about biased judging...CNTROL::CHILDSI need a Rasberry LollipopSun Feb 27 1994 14:058
but George what about the landing, both feet touching after coming out a
double toe loop (I think) that O.B. had? I'll grant you she was artistically
a bit better but Kerrigan won on wednesday and was batter techinically
again last night so I think she deserved first. She should have cried
or been orphan, or a pixie then she'd have beaten Oksana....

mike
155.832Both skaters were damn goodCTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Sun Feb 27 1994 17:3323
    George,
    I do not agree that Baiul was much better han Kerrigan. It was
    real close IMO. Baiul did land with both feet on one triple and
    also did a double instead of a triple same as Kerrigan.
     Both completed 5 triples..  I don't know Kerrigan looked better
    but Baiul was also outstanding. Maybe Baiul ashook her tootsies a
    little more and the judges bought it as more artistic.
    
    The difference? Baiul landerd her last triple combination right
    at the end in front of the judges. Great planning.. she
    pulled a cute Sugar Rim.. made the judges all but obverlook
    her double-ft mistake. Smart coaching.
    
    How can anyone tell with a tie-breaker?? 
    
    Let me ask one question. Baiul beats Kerrigan by a tiebreaker
    in the long program (.10 per artistic tie-breaker) and wins the
    gold by 5-4 on the ordinals.  Whatever happened to the short
    program results? Do they throw that out? I never heard mention
    that this figured into the overall tabulations.  What gives?
    
    MikeL
    
155.833HELIX::MAIEWSKISun Feb 27 1994 20:5137
  Oksana Baiul was the right choice for the gold medal. You guys are thinking
short program. The 2 footed landings were not that important for 2 reasons. 

  First, since this was the long program and not the technical program there
were no mandatory deductions for missed jumps. In the long program a 2 footed
landing means you don't get as many points but you don't lose points either.
She made it up with the triple toe loop she tossed in at the end. 

  Also her footwork was much better than Kerrigan's which counted toward her
technical mark. The whole 1st part of her program was done on point which
almost no skater can do. Remember, jumping is just one aspect of the technical
score, spins and footwork count as well. 

  Second, in spite of this Kerrigan did in fact win the technical score for the
long program but in the long program the presentation score is the tie breaker
and there Baiul clearly skated a better program. 

  As for the short program which Kerrigan won, yes it did factor in. Kerrigan
won that and Baiul finished second leaving them with .5 and 1.0 ordinal points
respectively. Since Baiul beat Kerrigan in the long program, she got 1.0 to
Kerrigan's 2.0 (the long program counts twice what the short program counts).
So: 

    Skater     Short Program    Long Program     Final Score
    ------     -------------    ------------     -----------
    Baiul           1.0       +      1.0       =     2.0
    Kerrigan        0.5       +      2.0       =     2.5

  Ordinal points are like golf, low score wins so Baiul wins the gold, Kerrigan
the silver. 

  Had it been Chen Lu who had won the long program with Kerrigan 2nd, then
Kerrigan would have won since Chen Lu finished the short program back in 4th but
being ahead of someone by only one position in the short program doesn't help
that much. 

  George
155.834She "Sugar rimmed" it...CTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Sun Feb 27 1994 22:4530
    OK George thanks for the explanation but it is still too
    complicated. It effectively negates the short program (technical).
    If botching a landing means nothing as compared to presentation,
    then this should not be classified as a true sport rather an
    exhibition. I just don't understand all the nuances. Even those
    that do must be confused by  the ultimate judging and standings.
    
    Tell me why a performer can look so good (ala Elaine Zayak?) in
    the US but get judged so low? I still think the judging is too
    subjective and political. And this is not a pro-Kerrigan
    complaint as I'm sure she has been on the positive end of such
    judging..
    
    As far as Bauil getting points for short step maneuvers, aren't
    they by definition more technical than artistic? Did not Kerrigan
    perform these difficult maneuvers in the short program? 
    So which is it, are these "technical" or "artistic"?
    
    And as far as Baiul being the clear choice, are you as qualified as
    Paul Wylie, various Canadian, American, and British figure skating
    n"names" who expresed surprise that Baiul was judged first? Even
    the "dean" Dick Button thought it was too close to call, i.e., a
    dead heat.  
    
    All in all, I jusat don't understand the "objectivity" of the
    Judging. And I know I'm not alone. If I chose to read up
    on all the criteria, I'd probably be as confused as I am now.
    
    MikeL
    
155.835HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Feb 28 1994 01:2050
  Ok, let's dispel this "short program means nothing" question 1st.

  The saying is that you can't win the gold medal in the short program but you
can lose it. Tonya Harding lost the gold medal in the short program. Brian
Boitano and Viktor Petrenko lost the gold medal in the short program of the
men's program. The mandatory deductions that add up when you flub the short
program can take you out of the contest. 

  Nancy Kerrigan and Oksana Baiul came in 1st and 2nd in the short program so
neither lost the gold medal in the short program, they both came out of that
contest in contention for 1st place running neck and neck in the ordinals with
0.5 and 1.0 respectively. That's pretty close when you consider that the numbers
went from 0.5 to about 14.0. They came in 1st and 2nd out of 27 in the short
and they came out 1st and 2nd out of 27 in the long. Because Baiul won the
long, she won the gold medal. 

  The fact that Kerrigan won her 1st place by a bigger score is not that big a
deal. If the Celtics beat the Hawks by 30 points in game 1 of a series then
lost the 2nd by 1 point in overtime, they'd be tied 1 game each in spite of the
lopsided score in game 1. That doesn't mean that basketball is not a sport. 

  As for the judging, there is the technical and presentation score. The
technical score is based on how correctly the jumps, spins, and steps are done.
For the most part the correct way to do these is spelled out and you either do
it or you don't. The more difficult ones you do, the more points you get.

  Additionally, in the short program there are mandatory elements of these
jumps, spins, and steps dictated by the officials that must be included in the
program and done correctly to avoid mandatory deductions. If you miss one of
these required elements you lose lots of points. That doesn't happen in the
long program. All the moves of the long program are at the discretion of
the competitor. That's why it's sometimes called the "free program". They are
"free" to do what they want.

  Presentation is far more subjective but it can still be evaluated. There are
certain things that the judges look for and the athletes and coaches know what
those things are. Is it fuzzy? yes. Does that mean it's not a sport? No. The
judges are consistent enough. 

  Yes it's complicated, but for those who have been involved all of their
life it's not as bad as it seems. To fans like me who only watch a few days
a year, it all seems fuzzy but I understand what's going on well enough to
see that those involved know what they are doing. To those who are just taking
their 1st look, understandably it all looks like mush.

  I agree Ice Dancing is a little borderline but figure skating is objective
enough to be considered a sport. And when you consider it's popularity, I
suspect that it will be considered a sport for some time to come.

  George
155.836Nancy is making $$. What is Baiul gonna make? Nothing...SALEM::STIGBig Sister HILLARY is Watching You!!Mon Feb 28 1994 04:225
    I think the difference could've been the selection of music. Nancy
    skated to something that wasn't as complicated as far as footwork.
    Baiul had the better music and a more difficult program.
    
                     stig
155.837DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Feb 28 1994 12:076
    	Here's my cut at ANY judged sport.
    
    	You spend your whole life training and practicing and then
    	ask someone else to tell you how you did. Give me a break.
    
    	Scott
155.838VERBOS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Mon Feb 28 1994 12:234
re: .781

just imagine what Jimmy Brown would think if he
knew he was gettin' dissed in a figgerskating note
155.840Four more years - I can waitLEAF::NAZZAROGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!!Mon Feb 28 1994 13:1810
    1) Thank goodness it's finally over.
    
    2) Please, figure skating is not a sport, it's a competition.
    
    3) I always thought that these subjective judges made the younger
    skaters wait their turn to earn gold.  Always used to be that no matter
    how good you skated, you didn't get gold if it wasn't your turn.  Was
    it Bauil's turn Friday night?
    
    NAZZ
155.841I'm ashamed to be a "MerkinVERBOS::ALVEYHeather be Thy name...Mon Feb 28 1994 13:2516
What a couple of whiny sore losers we sent 
to the ladies figure skating competition!
Did you read NK's remarks as she awaited
Baiul's arrival on the awards stand?
Told that Oksana was doing her makeup,
NK replied, "Why? She's just gonna cry and mess it
up again."

And her mom's real classy, too.
"No way in holy hell she (Oksana) has more style
than Nancy."

Give me Bonnie Blair and Picabo Street any day.

dr.a
155.842I'm Glad It's OverWREATH::SCOPAMon Feb 28 1994 13:3118
    I've always wondered why figure skating is called a sport since winners
    and losers are determined by subjective ratings done by a bank of
    judges.
    
    I also think that no matter how well Kerrigan skated Friday night
    Oksana was destined for the gold.
    
    I wasn't too pleased regarding Kerrigan's attitude. She's supposed to
    represent her country and she made the US look like a country filled
    with soresports.
    
    She probably made two commercials with Disney, one that says, "Hey
    Nancy Kerrigan you just won a gold...." and the one we saw "Hey Nancy
    Kerrigan......won our hearts...."
    
    Good riddance to Tonya and Nancy....time to move along.
    
    M
155.843Cab Mickey do a double axel...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Mon Feb 28 1994 13:368
I liked NK a lot until...

Instead of going to the closing event, she was pictued in both Boston papers
this morning mugging it up with Mickey Mouse in Disney World.

She couldda waited a day...

=Bob=
155.844If Oksana's in the WCs, I'll watch... it's a_obsession...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 28 1994 13:3636
    
>    I think the difference could've been the selection of music. Nancy
>    skated to something that wasn't as complicated as far as footwork.
>    Baiul had the better music and a more difficult program.
    
    Nancy skated to Neil Diamond.  That's a mandatory 0.2 deduction on
    technical merit (the guy cain't sing), and a 0.4 on artistic 
    impression (the guy cain't sing with feeling).  But seriously, both
    Kerrigan and Bauil skated like champions.  For the first time in my 
    memory this competition wasn't just a coronation of the pre-ordained 
    champion, with almost everyone else using their butts to polish the ice 
    for the gold-medal winner's routine.  Even if it isn't a sport, it's 
    still a competition with enormous pressure on, and both Kerrigan and 
    Bauil showed that they could teach a few things to the athletes from 
    the sports we male-chauvinist types love.  Maybe they could start
    tutoring Thurman Thomas next week...
    
    As for the judging, I think the 5-4 split tells you all you need to
    know about whether the decision was the "right" one.  George, are you
    prepared to make a statement on the qualifications of those four
    judges?  That they're all Yankee-loving capitalist dogs?  It's 
    inherently obvious from the way these scores were split that politics 
    were at work.  I have no idea who should have won, but please don't 
    try to tell me that the judging was actually an objective reflection of 
    the valued elements of figure skating in the respective countries.
    
    With that said, for me Oksana Bauil pulled this event out of a
    potential gutter.  I thought she was tremendous.  I have to disagree 
    that Kerrigan will go on to make all the money and that Bauil will get
    nothing.  At the risk of sounding too much like a CBS talking head,
    Bauil really did captivate the world's imagination.  If Kerrigan can 
    make $10M, then teach Bauil a few cute English phrases and she'll 
    make $50M.
    
    glenn
    
155.845Media loves those immediate soundbitesCTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Mon Feb 28 1994 13:3615
    I believe Kerrigan's comments were made off-hand after she just learned
    she got nosed out by Baiul, I think a little frustration is
    understandable. She's human fer cryeye, and this was an immediate
    reaction, give her some slack. Do you hold the Chinese and Canadian
    skaters who lambasted Cathy Turner to the same standards?
    Hell these people just worked years for this event so I can understand
    if they're not all peachykeen with praise for their opponents.
    
    And Baiul cries more than Tammy Baker. Yea I know you're an orphan, had
    a tough life, but save the canned tears for Oprah fer gawd's sake.
    
    What's Mrs Kerrigan supposed to say? My daughter's a lowlife?
    
    MikeL
    
155.846It's about time!LEAF::NAZZAROGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOAL!!!!!!!!!Mon Feb 28 1994 13:447
    Thank goodness Nancy finally showed a little guts and said what she
    felt.  I cain't believe any real true-blooded American would have any
    problem at all with her finally speaking her mind (a true American
    tradition) and not having to sound like everything she said was
    scripted.
    
    NAZZ
155.847Oksana in the WCs, Nancy on SNL... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 28 1994 13:5017
>    Thank goodness Nancy finally showed a little guts and said what she
>    felt.  I cain't believe any real true-blooded American would have any
>    problem at all with her finally speaking her mind (a true American
>    tradition) and not having to sound like everything she said was
>    scripted.
    
    I agree, even though she was mistaken and wrong in what she said (about 
    the delays in the medal presentation).  The girl has been under the
    pressure-cooker for almost two months, and by and large her behavior 
    has been exemplary.  She made a few comments, but I thought she was
    generally gracious in defeat.  It could have been a lot worse, and may
    have been worse with many other competitors who we don't get to see or
    whose language we don't understand... 
    
    glenn
    
155.848She was brilliant thoughCTHQ::LEARYTonya's speed dial number: #*Mon Feb 28 1994 13:5413
    Agreed glenn,
    
    I thought it was a bit humorous when Baiul finished her skate and
    was bawling in the arms of her coach/mom. When the coach saw the
    cameras, she mouthed something to Oksana who flashed the phoniest
    smile this side of Ollie North vs Congress and waved to the camera
    while sobbing. This girl's ready for Hollywood.
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
    
155.849DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Mon Feb 28 1994 13:578
    	The Olympics are a microcosm of life. We saw classy people who
    	were also good athletes.
    
    	We saw classless people who are good athletes.
    
    	In the big scheme of things, the real heroes shown through.
    
    	Scott
155.851CSOA1::BACHThey who know nothing, doubt nothing...Mon Feb 28 1994 14:102
    Yikes.  All see said was "C'mon, she's just going to cry it off
    again..".   Not a horrendous paux pas...
155.852There were some great momentsAIMHI::KERRCurse Of The Box PeopleMon Feb 28 1994 14:3734
    
    Despite all of the Nancy/Tonya/Oksana sideshows, and the sappy CBS
    coverage, I watched most of these Olympics and really enjoyed them. 
    Some real highlights for me:
    
    Bonnie Blair's two golds
    Tommy Moe, Tommy Moe, Tommy Moe (I bet he doesn't golf as well as he
    skies).
    Diane Roeth Steinrotter(sp), (great skier, funny name)
    The ski jumping (especially the Norwegians)
    The Italians and Norwegians hammering each other down the stretch after
    24 miles in the 4x10 Men's X-country relay.
    Koss and Jensen (just superb!)
    Kathy Turner (I like her style, even if the officials disn't)
    LaBomba Tomba's second run in the Men's Slalom (with the exception of
    the second gate, proabably the most perfect slalom run I've ever seen)
    and,
    even the Ladies Finals on Friday (I thought both Bayul and Kerrigan were
    terrific).
    
    But, probably the two most emotional moments (for me anyway) were Katarina
    Witt's performance of "Where have all the Flowers Gone" in the Ladies 
    finals and Torvell and Dean's "Bolero".   Those two perfomances really put
    all of the media hype and sensationalism in perspective.
    
    Now, it's off to Japan!
    
    Al
    
    
    
    
    
     
155.854What about this one?NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 28 1994 16:2316
    
>> It's inherently obvious
>> from the way these scores were split that politics were at work. 

> Not necessarily. I've seen lots of these contests and the Eastern judges
> almost always go for the more classic style while the western judges usually
> lean toward the more athletic or elegant style. Can you name other skating
> competitions that you've seen where this was not true? 
 
    You've "seen lots of contests" but what is your explanation in
    *this* one?  To me, Kerrigan seems to skate much more in the classic 
    style a la Katerina Witt, and Bauil in the more athletic style.  So 
    what is the explanation for the clean voting-bloc split?
    
    glenn
    
155.855HANNAH::ASHEOne of the sweethearts at DigitalMon Feb 28 1994 16:261
    Jamaican Bobsleds ROOL!!!
155.857FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Mon Feb 28 1994 16:455
    Did Nancy participate in the "free skate"?  If so, was she more
    creative/artistic under this type of environment?
    
    thanks,
    Mike
155.859Highlight of the 'pics was Dave's mom giving Moe da hamCAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementMon Feb 28 1994 16:534
    Hey mods, either shut down this faux sport discussion or I start a
    rasslin' note.
    
    Mark.
155.860Short track speed skatingCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Mon Feb 28 1994 16:5919
So what'd ya' think about Cathy Turner being DQ'ed in the semi-final
heat of the 1000 meter race?  It struck me that the judges were
just looking for a reason to disqualify her to appease those who
had complained earlier.

The other thing that doesn't make sense to me was that the judges
had her up until 3:00 a.m. taking doping samples.  She had to
give 3 different samples.  Seems kind of strange to me.  It's almost
as if they were trying to find something.

I really like the short track racing.  It kept me on the edge of my
seat, especially the men's 5k relay.  It's sort of a cross between
roller derby and figure skating.  The only reason I say figure skating
is that there seems to be a lot of power given to the judges and
their decisions often seem arbitrary and based on something other
than what is happening at the time.  Maybe they'll start giving
style points.

Jerry
155.861If it were that obvious it'd have been 9-0NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 28 1994 17:0324
>>    You've "seen lots of contests" but what is your explanation in
>>    *this* one?  To me, Kerrigan seems to skate much more in the classic 
>>    style a la Katerina Witt, and Bauil in the more athletic style.  So 
>>    what is the explanation for the clean voting-bloc split?
>    
> No, Bauil skated in a more classic style. In fact, she lost to Kerrigan on
> the technical mark which is usually associated with the more athletic elements.
    
    Okay, I hear you on the differences in style.  I still think that when
    you have a 5-4 vote won on a tie-breaker, in a competition that you,
    George Maiewski, are able to say that Bauil clearly and objectively
    won, that there's a discontinuity in logic there.  It appeared to me 
    that the entire world of skating critics including the judges were 
    split almost cleanly down the middle.  I think you've been about the
    only one I've heard claim that there's little or no subjectivity
    involved, right down to the competitors involved (and I'm not even one
    arguing that this is not a sport, and I don't have a big problem with
    subjective judging-- who cares?  It's like boxing; where there are 
    great performances put in by great athletes, the scoring needn't 
    detract from that...)
    
    glenn
     
155.862QUASER::JACKSONTALong lost recipeMon Feb 28 1994 17:1010
      Kerrigan = Rich sore 2nd place finish. She thought she had the gold
    	    	 wrapped up before she even landed in Norway. She didn't
    		 win because of popularity. She lost because the other
    		 skater was better.
    
      Turner = Raiders style of play, aggressive and push the rules to the
    	       limit to see what you can get away with. I didn't see any
    	       other skaters having the incidents that she continually had!
    
      Tim
155.863WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MHall of Fame #75Mon Feb 28 1994 17:179
    
    
    
       Kerrigan = Big Teeth like you know who.
    
       US Hockey = Underachievers like the Donks!
    
    
    Chap
155.866QUASER::JACKSONTALong lost recipeMon Feb 28 1994 19:143
      Did I forget to put in the word probably?
    
      Tim
155.867Nothing "clear" about it; individual marks subjectively differedNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 28 1994 21:0128
> Either you misunderstood what I said or I didn't say it right. I felt that
> Oksana Baiul clearly won the presentation portion of the Long program. I agree
> that Kerrigan won the technical part of the long program.
>
> Because the presentation part is the tie breaker in the long program and
> because of the way the arithmetic with ordinals works, clearly Baiul deserved
> the gold medal.
    
    Obviously the judges didn't screw up the arithmetic with the ordinals,
    and them's the rules, so yes, Bauil wins.  There's no argument about
    that.  What I disagree with is this simplistic explanation of an 
    overall technical/presentation split, with the suggestion that Bauil
    won the presentation overall so she wins the tie-breaker.  That's not 
    the way it works; it goes judge-by-judge, and four judges said that 
    Bauil did not "clearly deserve" the gold medal.  That's four people in
    disagreement with your strongly-held opinion, and all four of them
    world-class figure skating judges.  All the judges didn't even have 
    Bauil winning the presentation.  That's where I have the problem with 
    the claims that the judging is actually objective enough that to say
    that one competitor "clearly" won this element and the other "clearly" 
    won that element.  Those claims were *not* borne out in each of the 
    scores, across the board.  No big deal, but that still leaves a high 
    element of politicism and/or differing priorities, therefore 
    subjectivity in the judging of the sport...
    
    glenn
    
155.869I've heard no better explanation on the merits of the judgingNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 13:0729
    
>>    Those claims were *not* borne out in each of the 
>>    scores, across the board.  No big deal, but that still leaves a high 
>>    element of politicism and/or differing priorities, therefore 
>>    subjectivity in the judging of the sport...
    
>  Again no one disagrees with the part of it being subjective but where in this
>  argument have you proven that politics is involved?
    
    I haven't proven anything (neither have you) but the national bloc 
    alignment of the judges was the only split with any kind of an obvious 
    correlation at all.  You voiced some opinions about styles and the 
    technical/artistic value differences between the separate parts of 
    the world (saying that it was clear that Kerrigan won technical, and
    Bauil won artistic) but it didn't show up in the scores.  Guess what?  
    Technical marks were 3-3-3 (K-B-Tie), and artistic also 3-3-3, with no 
    consensus from either voting bloc favoring one element over the other.
    It don't get more symmetrical than 3-3-3, leaving no room for
    hand-waving interpretation whatsoever...
    
    It's evident to me at least that if the skating were very close (as it
    was), Kerrigan was going to take the US judge and Bauil the Ukraine and
    the rest would fall in place with some general correlation.  As it
    turned out that general correlation was exact, and that left the
    competition to one judge.  That's what I (and most informed commentators 
    I've heard) believe, but you're free to believe whatever you wish.
    
    glenn
     
155.871Sorry, George, you really need to bone up on this stuff ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 13:3621
                                  
> No I don't believe that is correct. Using your notation I believe that the
> technical marks were 5-4 (K-B) and the artistic marks were 4-5 (K-B) with 
> Kerrigan winning the 4 ordinals from the west and Bauil winning the 4 ordinals
> from the east.
    
    No, you're wrong (imagine that, someone who as opposed to the rest of
    us ignorant peons actually knows something about figure skating being
    wrong!).  There was no such clean split.  A judge can vote a tie in one
    element and have his/her overall vote decided by the other element. 
    And that's exactly what happened, in several instances.
    
> I heard that explanation from CBS and from the Boston Globe. Where did you
> get your 3-3-3 score? 
    
    I looked at the marks.  A novel concept.  It helps to filter out all
    the bias and misinformation you can get in this conference, and
    requires only basic math skills... ;-)
    
    glenn
     
155.873A shocking credibility gap... I'm starting to worry...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 14:0415
                                                             
> In fact, a regular fan over in the skating notes file who has judges for
> friends also said that Kerrigan lost on the tie breaker. So maybe we are all
> wrong and you are right. If so, congradulations, you are the only guy who knows
> that there is no tie breaker and that the medal went to the wrong skater. 
    
    George, the presentation tie-breaker that everyone has been referring
    to is not the overall presentation marks but the *single* presentation 
    mark of that *one* judge to decide that *one* ordinal (overall, they
    were tied there too, 3-3-3)!  That's exactly the way it has been 
    reported.  Are you really telling me you didn't know that?  If so, 
    you've been causing this confusion all along.
    
    glenn
    
155.874Change of PaceWREATH::SCOPATue Mar 01 1994 14:175
    C'mon guys let's get down to serious business like discussing whether
    or not Oksana, not Nancy, should have gotten that lucrative Revlon
    contract!
    
    ;^)
155.876CSC32::GAULKETue Mar 01 1994 14:2915
    
 re .872

>>   Interesting point, that noter over in skating said that using
>>presentation for the tie breaker was started after 1988 and that if presentation had
>>been used back then, Brian Orser of Canada would have won the gold medal
>>instead of Brian Boitano from the U.S.
    
    
    
    Wow, can you imagine the buzzing coming from ASABET::SPORTS_88.NOTE?
    Oh my! Talk about a scorching <KP>ENTER
    

    
155.877NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 14:2922
> Now every listing I've seen results in 5 1st place Ordinals for Baiul and 4
> 1st place ordinals for Kerrigan. If you've seen differently, fine. Baiul got
> the medal which seems to back up the 5-4 score for ordinals in the long program.
> If you feel it ended up 3-3-3, then how do you explain the gold medal going
> to Baiul, a mistake?
    
    I'm finished playing games with you, George.  You can re-read the
    following two paragraphs and decide for yourself which is correct.  
    Go back to the scores and look at them for yourself, if necessary...
    
>>   Guess what?  
>>   Technical marks were 3-3-3 (K-B-Tie), and artistic also 3-3-3, with no 
>>   consensus from either voting bloc favoring one element over the other.
>>   It don't get more symmetrical than 3-3-3, leaving no room for
>>   hand-waving interpretation whatsoever...
>
> No I don't believe that is correct. Using your notation I believe that the
> technical marks were 5-4 (K-B) and the artistic marks were 4-5 (K-B) with 
> Kerrigan winning the 4 ordinals from the west and Bauil winning the 4 ordinals
> from the east.                                                       
    
155.878PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 14:376
155.880PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 14:395
155.882MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 14:5420
NOTE:	Not actual values:

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9

#1 T	5.8	5.8	5.8	5.8	5.8	5.8	5.8	5.9	5.8
#1 P	5.8	5.7	5.8	5.7	5.8	5.7	5.8	5.8	5.8
	11.6	11.5	11.6	11.5	11.6	11.5	11.6	11.6	11.6
	1	2	2	1	1	2	1	2	2

#1 T	5.8	5.7	5.9	5.8	5.7	5.9	5.8	5.8	5.9
#1 P	5.6	5.8	5.8	5.6	5.8	5.9	5.6	5.9	5.8
	11.4	11.5	11.7	11.4	11.5	11.8	11.4	11.6	11.7
	2	1	1	2	2	1	2	1	1

Note Technical marks are split 3-3-3
Note Presentation marks are split 3-3-3
Note skater wins ordinals 5-4 (with judge #8 equivalent to the German judge)

This would demonstrate how Glenn could be right, George.  (Of course, this
may not be something you can accept.)
155.883one more vote for IBAIMHI::CORRIGANTue Mar 01 1994 14:554
    
    re .595
    
    Awesome. It WAS Lillehammer for me!!
155.884FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Tue Mar 01 1994 14:569
155.885We have a winner!NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 14:588
    
> Note Technical marks are split 3-3-3
> Note Presentation marks are split 3-3-3
    
    Thank you, Rich!  This scenario is what happened...
    
    glenn
    
155.886PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 15:039
155.887In the tradition of true sprotstersCSC32::GAULKETue Mar 01 1994 15:0414
 re .881

>>  Ok, say it's 5 seconds to go in the final game of the 1994 NBA championship
>>and the Bulls lead the Suns by 1. Barkley gets the ball and goes up to shoot
>>and Pippen slaps him on the writs. The shot misses, no whistle blows, the
>>buzzer goes off, the Bulls 4-peat.


  Why not use a real game, lessay the 93 Eastern Conference finals. 
  Game 7 NY vs Chicago, Bulls by 1, Charles Smith has the ball under
 the basket, and gets hacked for 7 seconds by 4 Bulls, with no 
 whistle. 

  
155.888PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 15:055
155.889FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Tue Mar 01 1994 15:124
    >  Game 7 NY vs Chicago, Bulls by 1, Charles Smith has the ball under
    
    yeah, that's the rebounding forward that hauled down 0 rebounds in 48
    minutes on Sunday.
155.890PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 15:1313
155.891PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 15:2511
155.892CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 15:2516
I can't believe we're wasting all this space on figure skating, when
one of the most exciting hockey matches I've ever seen took place
on Sunday in the Gold Medal Game.

This reminded me of two heavy-weights slugging it out, trading punch for
punch.

I wasn't *thrilled* about the shoot-out format (and I hope the NHL doesn't
adopt it), but even the shoot out was exciting.


By far, the most exciting (and thankfully under-hyped) event of the 
weekend....


'Saw
155.893CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 15:267
>    This sums up quite well why Nazz and others haven't been convinced by
>    your arguments that figure skating is not a sport.  How can you
>    possibly equate a vote with a runner scoring or a puck going into the
>    net?

In the World According to George, anything is possible.....

155.895PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 15:476
155.898CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 15:5212
Like I said, I wasn't thrilled with the shoot-out format.  As one of the
announcers on WFAN said -- it was the last event, and they could have
played for hours, no one else needed the ice....

But, even still, you can't take away the fact that it was a very exciting
game.

There was this one BRUTAL check by a Canadian on a Swede.  It bordered on
a charge, but was without a doubt one of the best hits I've ever seen....


'Saw
155.900CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 15:5840
>  If you can't win an argument, just change around what the other guy said,
>right Mac? Show me one place where I ever said the way in which a home run
>is hit counts for anything.

He's not changing around what you said.  He's simply applying the logic
you've been spouting in here to other things.   It's a fairly common
technique.

Or don't you acknowledge techniques which would in any way, shape, form
or fashion lessen your image as an expert on everything?


>  Any reason why you are completely ducking the subject of the subjective
>strike zone? I can think of one, it's because it proves how wrong you are
>and how subjective baseball really is.

Everything is subjective.  No one ever said baseball wasn't subjective.
Until they develop a computerized/electronic monitor system for the
strike zone, it always will be.

The best umps, while subjective in their strike zone, are consistent
in their strike zone.


The bottom line is that while baseball may have a subjective element,
there are far more objective elements that, when the dust settles and
all is said and done, enable the winner of a baseball game to be
pretty clearly determined.


And before you bring it up, if an unscrupulous umpire were to call
a large strike zone for one team, and a very tiny zone for the opponents,
thus enabling one team to win the game, there are checks and balances
in place to catch that, and ultimately get rid of that ump.  Nothing
like that exists in the "sport" of figure skating.....



'Saw

155.902PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 16:104
155.903PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 16:129
155.905CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 16:1722
>  So rather than saying baseball is objective and figure skating is subjective
>we have to say there is a fuzzy line and baseball seems to lean one way while
>figure skating leans the other. Or to put it another way, it's a subjective
>call as to what is a sport and what is not, rather than an iron clad right and
>wrong. 

We don't have to say anything at all George.   Figure skating doesn't
"lean".   Figure skating is as far to one side of that line as Rush Limbaugh
is from the center.  Baseball is as far to the other side of the line.


>  Not so. There is a governing body that controls the judges of figure skating
>and it is quite common for someone to be reprimanded or removed from future
>competition for judging based on them being too political or showing other
>bias. 

Yep, and for all those years that the Communist Bloc country judges would
"objectively" decide that a communist block double lutz was better than
a western double lutz, that governing body was a veritable gelding.....


'Saw
155.906PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 16:186
155.907PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 16:208
155.911PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 16:3817
155.912Did Kerrigan "win" the technical (no), and Baiul artistic? (no)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 16:3824
> Glenn then started haranguing me about how clearly I was wrong because (and
> as far as I can see he pretty much repeated what I said with emphasis on the
> raw scores).
    
    Quite simply, is the following statement (yours) incorrect, or isn't it?
    
> No I don't believe that is correct. Using your notation I believe that the
> technical marks were 5-4 (K-B) and the artistic marks were 4-5 (K-B) 
    
    I thought I was making a legitimate point that there was no real
    consistency in any of the judging, between the elements or otherwise.
    It was an innocent enough observation; I wasn't looking for an argument 
    on the scoring because I know how that worked.  Now if you just don't
    want to deal with that lack of consistency (a perfect 3-3-3 scoring 
    split in each element), that's fine, but it does nothing for your 
    claims that there really is some well-understood method to the scoring 
    based on what the judges were seeing.  There could not have been a more 
    divided opinion of what went on on the ice, except if you look at the
    collective opinion of each political camp.  That's the only correlation 
    from the scoring that I can see.    
    
    glenn
    
155.913MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 16:4433
>   Then there's no argument. My original point was that the raw scores produced
> ordinals for each judge, those were combined to come up with an over all
> ordinal and that ordinals pointed to a winner. Because the German judge who
> was the swing vote had a split vote, a tie breaker was used to determine that
> ordinal and thus the championship.
> 
>   I then went on to say that under this system it was clear who won.
> 
>   Glenn then started haranguing me about how clearly I was wrong because (and
> as far as I can see he pretty much repeated what I said with emphasis on the
> raw scores).
> 
>   Now what's the beef?
> 
>   George

  George, the "argument" or "the beef" wasn't in how the winner was determined,
  but in your assertion in .833:

>  Second, in spite of this Kerrigan did in fact win the technical score for the
>long program but in the long program the presentation score is the tie breaker
>and there Baiul clearly skated a better program. 

  Glenn demonstrated how three judges marked Kerrigan higher in presentation
  than they did Baiul; three judges marked Baiul higher in presentation than
  Kerrigan; and three judges marked them even.  Since only 1/3 of the judges
  marked Baiul as having a better presentation, Glenn used the actual values
  to demonstrate that it was by no means clear (i.e., it certainly wasn't
  clear to 66 2/3% of the olympic judges).  People didn't agree with your
  statement that Baiul "clearly skated a better program," and there seems to
  be some valid evidence that the judges weren't persuaded, either.  Three
  judges and George seemed to think so; 6 judges didn't seem to think she was
  any better.
155.915MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 16:5513
>  Just about every judge seems to agree it was a dead heat with Kerrigan having
>the edge technically and Baiul having the edge in presentation. Since
>presentation (on a judge by judge basis) is the tie breaker, Baiul gets the
>gold medal. 
>
>  That's the gist of what I was saying, do you disagree with that?
>
>  George 

 If you are trying to say that every judge considered it about a dead heat,
 I agree.  If you are trying to say every judge considered Kerrigan to have
 an edge technically, and Baiul to have an edge artisitcally, I'd say you
 are way off, and Glenn's information PROVES it.
155.916PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 16:5710
155.919MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 17:0612
>  I believe that if you take a look at the context from the notes around that
>statement you will see that people were expressing opinions at that point. In
>keeping with that thread, I entered my opinion that that Baiul clearly skated a
>better artistic program than Kerrigan.

>  George

   I don't pretend to be an expert, either.  I am expressing my opinion that
 Baiul didn't skate a better artistic program.  That's my opinion.  I also
 state as fact that 2/3 of the judges didn't think that Baiul didn't skate
 a better artistic program.  At least in comparison to Olympic judges, your
 view was in the minority.
155.920MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 17:1223
>  It was a very close contest. 

   Agreed.

> Most people seem to agree that Kerrigan was a little better technically
> and that Baiul was a little better artistically.

  Disagree.  I think you are completely wrong here.

> I believe those edges were enough so that it was clear. 

  Fine, you have a right to your opinion.  I have a right to dispute it,
  and I have a right to dispute your assertion that most people agree with
  you, until you have data to support the assertion.  You have presented no
  such data.  I personally believe that most people did not think that, and
  there was NO CLEAR DIFFERENCE between the two skaters.  I believe that most
  reasonable people think it was a POLITICAL decision, though I also have no
  data to back this up.

> If some of the judges disagree with me fine, I'm entitled to my opinion.

  You sure are.  Note that 2/3 of the judges disagreed with you, not just
  a small minority.
155.922Thank you... that's all I wanted to know...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 17:1517
> I don't pretend to be an expert, but I believe that she did skate a better
> artistic program and that Kerrigan got a sympathy vote from some of the western
> judges (i.e. a bad call) on presentation.
    
    Finally!  The crux of the matter.  This is personal opinion, I can 
    respect that, and I might even agree with it.  I just wanted to 
    establish that there was a contradiction between anything about the 
    judging of this competition being "clear" at the same time the
    marks were so close and so scattered between the elements.  And you've
    given a possible explanation: impartiality from the Western judges.
    That's also something you'd be hard-pressed to prove exists in
    baseball, etc., at least to such an extent (the final result of the
    competition-- picking the winner-- as determined by those four judges).
    
    glenn
     
155.923MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 17:167
	I think they are all sports.  I can agree with you in that.
	It's a completely separate issue.

	In my mind, it's much easier to be an outstanding rugby player
	or basketball player as compared to being an outstanding figure
	skater.

155.925CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 17:2819
>  I believe that if you take a look at the context from the notes around that

>  I don't pretend to be an expert, 

>  I base my opinion on the fact that 

>  The discussion of how the score was calculated followed. That's a separate
>discussion.


Has anyone seen George and ACC Chris together at the same time?


All we need now is a "Me and Nancy", and the picture is complete......


'Saw


155.926MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 17:2913
>  One more thing about the scoring, the way you guys have added it up shows
>that the votes were 3-3-3 in terms of who won but that's not the way it's
>calculated. They don't count how many marks you win from each judge, they total
>the marks from each judge and when you do that it comes out 5-4 4-5 with the
>German being the tie breaker. 

 Everyone in here agrees with you on that.  We all acknowledge that the
 scoring was correct, and that Baiul won according to the rules.  No one is
 claiming that the voting gave Kerrigan three firsts, Baiul three first place
 votes, and three were even.  Everyone agrees that Kerrigan got 4 first place
 ordinals, and Baiul got 5, all legal and correct.  However, so far as the
 PRESENTATION marks are concerened, then three voted Kerrigan better, three
 voted Baiul better, and three voted them even.
155.928PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 17:3525
155.931PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 17:387
155.932NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 17:3931
    
> What about all the talk of umpires squeezing the strike zone on Clemens after
> his fight with the umpire during the A.L.C.S? Regardless if they squeezed him
> or not, it was an issue and it was hard to say with any certainty if he was
> squeezed or not because the strike zone is so subjective. 
    
    That's what I meant by "at least not to such an extent".  Nobody throws
    up a card that says "Clemens wins" or "Clemens loses" (and, yes, that
    is in effect what they do in figure skating-- you better believe that
    each of those judges remembers the combined score and the tie-breaker
    he gave to each top skater).  If you have such finality combined with 
    impartiality there's opportunity for major injustice to the competitors 
    (happens all the time in boxing).  You've made much of the call on the 
    Jackie Robinson steal of home, for example, but that one actually goes 
    in baseball's favor, because Brooklyn still lost the game.  There was 
    no such finality to the decision, and there rarely is in baseball.
    
> One more thing about the scoring, the way you guys have added it up shows
> that the votes were 3-3-3 in terms of who won but that's not the way it's
> calculated. They don't count how many marks you win from each judge, they total
> the marks from each judge and when you do that it comes out 5-4 4-5 with the
> German being the tie breaker. 
    
    Please let's not backtrack.  I think everyone in this discussion
    understands the scoring system (and always did).  The 3-3-3 was only 
    used to demonstrate the judges' thinking on each of the elements, and 
    has no bearing on the overall scoring decision.
    
    glenn
    
                                          
155.935MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 17:4415
	No opinions allowed as how the scoring works and how the winner
	is determined, no.

	Sure, your opinion is just as valid as Glenn's, Mac's, etc.,
	as far as whether one skater was better than another.  (Of course,
	I view my own with just a little more relative weight.)  In addition,
	it makes not one iota of difference what any of us think in so far
	as concrete results of the contest, only in how we think about it
	(and what it may or may not reflect on the rest of our world today).
	Moreover, we can think that the majority of people agree with us,
	but that may or may not be the case.  When we make assertions that
	"such-and-such is true," as contrasted to "I believe that such-and-such
	is true," we risk having people who have opposing opinions defend their
	opinions and pointing out where our assertions are no more than just
	personal beliefs.
155.937MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 17:4817
                     <<< Note 155.934 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>

>
>  Regardless of your impossible to implement strike zone effectively it is
>as subjective as judging figure skating presentation.
>
>  George
>

   Perhaps the reason people don't agree is that most everyone in this
   conference knows how the strike zone is defined.  People don't know
   how "presentation" scores are defined.  If anyone can provide the information
   that would demonstrate that there are strict rules by which presentation
   marks should be given, then there might be a more general agreement.

   Somehow, however, I doubt that this exists in the same way that a strike
   zone is defined.  
155.938CSC32::GAULKETue Mar 01 1994 17:485
    
    
     opinions are like rat-holes. Everybody goes down one.
    
    
155.939Carry on with the good fight for figure skating, George ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 17:5115
>>    That's what I meant by "at least not to such an extent".  Nobody throws
>>    up a card that says "Clemens wins" or "Clemens loses".
>
> Here we definitely disagree. If a pitcher is being squeezed his chances of
> winning go down dramatically. Holding up his arm to say "ball 4" to a pitch
> that nipped the outside corner has just as much of an impact as a judge
> punching the button to say 5.6 for artistic impression. 
    
    So that one call on one pitch on one batter of a minimum of 27 batters 
    that a pitcher must face in a game has "just as much" (equal) impact 
    to a full one-half of a skater's total score?  Please...
    
    glenn
    
155.940MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 01 1994 17:5217
>>    That's what I meant by "at least not to such an extent".  Nobody throws
>>    up a card that says "Clemens wins" or "Clemens loses".
>
>  Here we definitely disagree. If a pitcher is being squeezed his chances of
>winning go down dramatically. Holding up his arm to say "ball 4" to a pitch
>that nipped the outside corner has just as much of an impact as a judge
>punching the button to say 5.6 for artistic impression. 
>
>  George


   Not sure I would agree here.  His chances of holding the score down would
   dramatically decrease, but -- assuming impartiality on the part of the
   umpire -- so would the chances of the other side holding the score down.
   The pitcher may be just as likely to win in a high scoring game.  In fact,
   if he his team is much better offensively, his chances of winning may go
   UP if the strike zone is squeezed.
155.941PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 18:026
155.943METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Mar 01 1994 18:245
when did they put in the shoot-out for Hockey? what a stooooopid idea. Here
they take a real sport and change the rules to what soccer - a classic
sissy sport - uses.

The Crazy Met
155.944MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 01 1994 18:2616
    
        Like everyone else in here, I have been deeply saddened by
       the departure from DEC of several friends that I met through
       the years here in this notesfile. With each one that left,
       this notesfile was somehow lessened and I felt it incumbent
       upon each of us to pick up the slack and to carry on in mem-
       ory of our comrades long since departed. Yes, we have seen 
       sad sad days here in in SPORTS but we have always kept our 
       heads held high - bloodied but unbowed and all that rot. But 
       the saddest of those days does not even begin to compare with
       the deep sense of grief I feel when I see a prolonged discussion 
       on something so lame-assed as ladies figure skating, whose status 
       as even a sport is seriously questioned. Some of the legendary fig-
       ures of SPORTSnotes past would turn over in their electronic graves
       if they could see what a pansy outfit this has turned into. I
       feel so ashamed.
155.945CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 18:2713
>when did they put in the shoot-out for Hockey? what a stooooopid idea. Here
>they take a real sport and change the rules to what soccer - a classic
>sissy sport - uses.

Well, not being an expert, I couldn't tell you exactly when, but I know
it was in effect in 1992.

It does suck.

I hope the NHL doesn't adopt it.....


'Saw
155.946Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair.....CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 18:3327
155.947:-)METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Mar 01 1994 18:363
Hey 'Saw when did you get interested in the mystical stuff of Revelations??

The Crazy Met
155.948Like The Eveready BatteryWREATH::SCOPATue Mar 01 1994 18:388
    "And that makes out number three and the __________are the 1994
     World Series Champions. We now return you to the 1994 Winter
     Olympics note which has recently past the 10,000th reply and
     the argument continues...
    
    .....but first a word from Nancy Kerrigan and Revlon."
    
    ;^)
155.950LDUC alertMETSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Mar 01 1994 18:442
The Crazy Met
155.951CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 18:4541
>  And I feel deeply saddened with I see someone use the Junior Highschool
>tactic of trashing a sport that you don't understand simply because it's not
>regularly followed by the elitists sports bar crowd. 

George, ask yourself if that's really why we're trashing it?  



>  I remember having a big argument in the TV notes file superbowl note, many of

Gee, George, it sounds like you're always having arguments.  


>  I went through the same process I went through here of trying to explain what
>was going on, even to the extent of writing a 100+ line note explaining the
>rules. Still guys were convinced that it was not a sport. 

Maybe that should tell you something.


>  Grow a little. Consider the fact that maybe someone elses sport might have
>some redeeming value, especially if it's over 100 years old.

Never said it didn't.  

And hey, George, you grow a little.  Consider the fact that Crusaders are
basically annihilated in here, for nothing more than the subjective fact
that we consider it a sport.   As much of a sport as ladies figure skating
at any rate....


>  And if you can't stand the variety of sports, why not try a more specific
>notes file or learn to hit next-unseen.

Hey, no one's asking you to like it, and we're sure as hell not gonna change
it, so why not try a more specific notes file, or learn to hit next-unseen.....


'Saw


155.952But you're right, I do feel ashamed...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 18:459
>       Some of the legendary fig-
>       ures of SPORTSnotes past would turn over in their electronic graves
>       if they could see what a pansy outfit this has turned into. I
>       feel so ashamed.                         
    
    Defender of Torville and Dean, join us in prostrating thineself on thine
    sword!
    
155.953CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsTue Mar 01 1994 18:5118
>
>Hey 'Saw when did you get interested in the mystical stuff of Revelations??
>
>The Crazy Met

Huh?

Nothing I said could be farther from Revelation....

I mentioned nordic myth, "In Flanders Fields" and "Ozymandias".....


The only thing I know from Revelation is the Four Horseman of the Notre Dame
Backfield.....8^)


'Saw

155.954CSC32::GAULKETue Mar 01 1994 18:548
    
    
     Hey Brydie, quityer bitchin' about this here sports tavern.
    
     It ain't like we don't water the ferns or nuthin'....
    
    
    
155.955MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 01 1994 18:5616
    
     re .952
    
     Hahaha! I watched the Olympics and I thought T&D won and
     I'm ashamed that I even cared. But this danged note is on 
     the verge of breaking 1,000 replies thanks largely to the 
     neverending discussion about what George did or didn't say
     and what he does or doesn't know . Given his track record, 
     I don't know why you people bother arguing with him. Unless, 
     it's to see him perform the rare 'triple Maiewski' where he
     says something, then denies he said when it's proven wrong
     and then says you're nitpicking or getting personal when
     you prove he did actually say it. A move few would attempt
     yet George has made it a trademark in his short time here. 
     No offense, George but you really are all over the place
     with your logic.
155.956METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Mar 01 1994 19:0010
'Saw

re: George and arguments:

you should read ::baseball if you want to see some more arguments - oh about
once a week.

fwiw: not a judgement, just plain old facks.

The Crazy Met
155.958MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 01 1994 19:1112
    >> What a bunch of whinners.
         
       There's no 'h' in winners.
     
    >> Anyone want to take me up on my offer? If figure skating is in the 1996
    >> Olympics, I'm right it's a sport. If not, you guys are right it's not a 
    >> sport.
    
       Yeah, I'll take you up. The 1996 Olympics will be the summer games. The
       winter games don't take place until 1998. Wrong again, dude.
    
155.959MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 01 1994 19:1311
    
  re .954 
    
    >> Hey Brydie, quityer bitchin' about this here sports tavern.
    
       Hey Gaulke, the name is Tommy. If you're going to call me Brydie
       put a Mister in front of it.
    
    
    
    
155.960CSC32::GAULKETue Mar 01 1994 19:168
    
    
    >>If you're going to call me Brydie put a Mister in front of it.
    					      ^^^^^^
    
    Hey, that's how you water ferns. 
    
    
155.961HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 01 1994 19:1711
RE        <<< Note 155.958 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>       Yeah, I'll take you up. The 1996 Olympics will be the summer games. The
>       winter games don't take place until 1998. Wrong again, dude.
    
  Ha, hide behind a typo, grip about spelling.

  Figure skating will be in the next winter Olympics. The IOC will keep it
and we use that to determine if it's a sport, put up or shut up.

  George
155.962Clearly a sprot...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 01 1994 19:276
>       Yeah, I'll take you up. The 1996 Olympics will be the summer games. The
>       winter games don't take place until 1998. Wrong again, dude.
    
    Maybe that's just figure sinking, a k a synchro swimming...
    
155.963FRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Tue Mar 01 1994 19:353
    >    Maybe that's just figure sinking, a k a synchro swimming...
    
    maybe they should adopt countersynchro swimming(tm)
155.964PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 19:421
    And 'Saw leaps in with .946 to further prove Tommy's point.
155.965PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 19:456
155.966PTOVAX::JACOBI lift, you grab. ...Tue Mar 01 1994 19:487
    
    >>Obviously an enlightened crowd.
    
    Nah, they had just spent most of their day licking toads.
    
    JaKe
    
155.967PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 01 1994 19:497
155.968Wake when it's over DarlingSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOTue Mar 01 1994 20:0210
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

	Someone wake me when it's over.  And I thought the skating itself
was a real snoozer.


ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ


Zamboni
155.969WKRP::LEETCHU.S. Messaging Practice, CincinnatiTue Mar 01 1994 20:0714
Somewhere in the last 100 entries or so I had this image...

I think they ought to let figure skaters protest to the judges the same way
baseball players protest to umps....

Imagine Nancy Kerrigan in the German judge's face with flecks of spit flying 
out, hollering and screaming "you're #@&$#&$ nuts ump, there was no way I two
footed the &?$?@ triple axel, get yer !%&@??@ eyes checked" and finishing it up
with a Billy-Martin-style kicking of ice-dust on the judge and Lou-Piniella- 
style heaving of her flowers out on the ice.

:)

Bruce
155.970In the Olympics, money > sportMSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Tue Mar 01 1994 22:047
    George, of course the IOC will have figure skating in the 1998 Winter
    Olympics. It is the highest rated even they have; thats where lots of
    their TV dollars come from. Doesn't matter if it is a sport, it will be
    there because it rakes in the BIG bucks.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.971CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Wed Mar 02 1994 00:3011
    Why do they still call it synchronized swimming during the individual
    competition?
    
    And I think they should have ice fishing at the next Winter Olympics..
    First yahoo to down a 12pak of Scmidt's and land a small-mouthed
    bass wifout swallowing his chaw wins the gold... US team should be made
    up of Minnesotans and one Maniac.
    
    MikeL
    
    
155.972A Real Judged-sportMTWAIN::BURROWSRacers Ready...3,..2,..1,..Wed Mar 02 1994 12:2012
    re: .951
    
    Notes a sport in itself...I think you've got something there.
    
    I give George a 5.6 in Technical for tenacity in explaining the 
    technicalities.  I give him a 3.2 for Artistic Impression for taking 
    the bait and explaining them over (and over and over...).
    
    Speaking of bait, for .971, I give Leary a 5.9 on the laugh scale.
    
    Clark 
    
155.973Intensive Care UnitBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Mar 02 1994 12:488

	Heard on Paul Harvey coming in, Sun Valley Idaho, home of Picabo Street
	is naming part of their hospital after her.  Yep, that's right,

	Picabo ICU

	Kevin
155.974CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is four years old!!!!Wed Mar 02 1994 13:303
re: .937

Damn I wish I had come up with that...
155.975No wonder we're going down the shitterCAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementWed Mar 02 1994 15:2911
    After surfin through the last 400 replies in here, it astounds me that
    during these difficult times at Digital where every last penny matters,
    people can find the time to read, internalize and respond to notes for
    the duration of the workday. 
    
    Don't lay on the "I note between compiles" or "I'm on break", etc. Some
    of the ardent respondents to this note have replies every 4-5 minutes.
    
    What is wrong with this picture?
    
    Mark.
155.976HANNAH::ASHEOne of the sweethearts at DigitalWed Mar 02 1994 16:315
    Why go through 400 replies when a next unseen would suffice?  That's
    what I do...
    
    A LOT more wrong with this place than what you describe...
    
155.977CAMONE::WAYAces and EightsWed Mar 02 1994 17:3212
>    Don't lay on the "I note between compiles" or "I'm on break", etc. Some
>    of the ardent respondents to this note have replies every 4-5 minutes.
    

Yeah, well, maybe the stuff that I build takes a long time to build....
That and windows technology makes it possible.

But, in Walt's reply, he's right -- there's a lot more wrong than
folks in notes.

'Saw

155.978PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 02 1994 17:412
    Like program managers of low profit margin products flittin' off to the
    west coast to attend "business meetings".
155.979another angleFRETZ::HEISERshut up 'n' jam!Wed Mar 02 1994 17:522
    And in addition to the past few replies, it takes just as long to
    analyze timestamps on 400 replies as it does to reply every 5 minutes.
155.980He's got a point; apply it if/where necessary (I will)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 02 1994 18:044
    C'mon, guys, constructive criticism duly noted, no need to get
    personal; let's break it up and move on...
    
155.981Olympic WrapupPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 02 1994 18:5082
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Dave Barry)
Subject:Farewell to the Winter Olympics
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 94 14:18:35 EST
Message-ID:<S678.60ae@clarinet.com>

	LILLEHAMMER, Norway -- This is my last column from Norway.
I'm going back to the United States so I can thaw myself out and,
as a public health service, set fire to my long underwear. Also,
I'm hoping to turn on the TV and actually see some Winter Olympic
sports; this is almost impossible to do when you're in Norway,
what with all the mandatory Tonya Harding press events.
	I really enjoyed what I saw of the Olympics. My only
criticism is that there are too many sports that American TV
viewers cannot relate to, such as speedskating, which goes on
forever (Today's Events: Men's 600 meters; men's 601 meters; men's
601.1 meters; men's...). They should replace these events, as well
as cross-country skiing, with winter sports that Americans enjoy
and are good at, such as basketball.
	Also, I think the bobsled and luge events could be spiced
up a little. The problem now is that they're too predictable: In
the bobsled event, for example, the competitors ALWAYS ride in
bobsleds, so you, the observer, always know exactly what you're
going to see, namely, a bobsled whizzing past. It would be far
more entertaining if the competitors were judged on the creativity
of their vehicles.
	ANNOUNCER: "And here come the Americans ... they'll need
a great run here to beat the Austrians, who came down in an Amana
freezer .... OK, here they come, and they're riding ... MY GOD,
THE ENTIRE TEAM IS RIDING ON A STANDARD COMMODE! DO YOU BELIEVE IN
MIRACLES?"
	But these are minor quibbles. The Winter Olympics were
great, and the Norwegians were helpful and cheerful to the point
where I began to suspect that somebody was slipping industrial
quantities of Prozac into their reindeer meat. I think we should
give them all of our atomic weapons and ask them to take over the
United States and run it. This would give us two major advantages:
(1) Our country would become a LOT more civilized, and (2) We
would have a king named "Harald."
	This is not to say that Norway is a perfect country. It
has its flaws. It's cold a lot, and  I was SHOCKED to discover
this -- there are some Norwegians, possibly as many as six, who do
not speak flawless English. So just in case you ever go to Norway
in the winter, I have prepared, with the help of Norwegian Sissel
Karlsen, this list of
	EMERGENCY NORWEGIAN PHRASES
	"Jeg forstaar deg ikke. Orevoksen rain har frosset."  ("I
do not understand you. My earwax has frozen.")
	"Politimann, en elg har spist [hatt]  [frakk]
[reisekamerten] min."  ("Officer, a moose has eaten my [hat]  [coat]
[traveling companion].)
	Noen's taer hat fait av!"  ("Look! Somebody's toes
have fallen off!")
	"Hei! Det er MINE taer!"  ("Hey! Those are MY toes!")

	Really, you should go over there. The Norwegians really
seem to like Americans. One of my fondest memories of Norway is of
a late night at the bar in the main Olympics press center; Mitch
Albom, a fine sports columnist and musician, was playing the
piano, and we were singing old rock songs -- "Wonderful World,"
"Memphis,"  "Dream," songs like that. There was hardly anybody
around besides the Norwegians, mostly volunteers, who staffed the
press center, and they LOVED us. We were probably the number-one
musical act in the entire press center at that hour. At one point
we did a dramatic version of "My Girl," holding bananas for
microphones and attempting some actual synchronized dance steps,
and the crowd went WILD, at least for Norwegians.
	Finally, at about 2:30 a.m., we decided to close with one
last song,  "Land of 1,000 Dances." We sang a verse, then, as we
reached the chorus, we turned to the crowd.
	"Come on, Norwegians!" we said.  "Everybody join in!"
And they did. We sang together, Americans and Norwegians,
our voices filling the press center with words that came from our
hearts:

	Na, na na na na, na na na na, na na na, na na na ...

	Call me sentimental if you want, but to me, that's what
the Olympics are all about.

(C) 1994 THE MIAMI HERALD
DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
    
155.982NWD002::JOLMAMAPresident Clinton and her husband.Mon Mar 07 1994 19:207
    It's March and the Sonics are still the top team in the NBA.
    
    The primary area of concern must be Rick Pierce's bad foot- looks
    like he may be out for the rest of the year.
    
    Right now, the look like a three way race to see who'll play either
    the Knicks of Atlanta.  The 3 being Salt Lake, San Antone & Seattle.
155.983is the NBA in the Winter Olympics now?FRETZ::HEISERthe rock cries out!Mon Mar 07 1994 19:581
    
155.984Nancy on Dateline last nightOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Mar 09 1994 12:195
    Did anyone catch Nancy Kerrigan's interview with Jane Pauley last
    night. She can cry as well as Tonya can.
    
    The other day at the parade she said "Mickey Mouse is the finest mouse
    I have ever met"
155.985CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 12:2421
>
>    Did anyone catch Nancy Kerrigan's interview with Jane Pauley last
>    night. She can cry as well as Tonya can.
>    
>    The other day at the parade she said "Mickey Mouse is the finest mouse
>    I have ever met"


Man, I'm beginning to think this girl is dumber than a stump.  

I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:

	"You wanted this girl, so suck it up, cause that's the
	 way it is"


If I had all that money she's gonna be getting, I'd let 'em film me
taking a dump if they wanted to......


'Saw
155.986MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 09 1994 12:257
    
  >> The other day at the parade she said "Mickey Mouse is the finest mouse
  >> I have ever met"
    
     I guess 'Saw was right all along. This girl is as smart as a
     lampshade.
     
155.987NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 09 1994 12:2915
    I don't understand the Mickey Mouse comment.  It sounds like a
    tongue-in-cheek acknowledgement of the previous blunder.  I don't get
    it; what's the joke here?
    
> I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:
>
>	"You wanted this girl, so suck it up, cause that's the
>	 way it is"
    
    Wow, that's really shocking, Don Imus, leading practitioner of insult
    humor in the USA, rationalizing his own existence... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
155.988CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 12:306
>     I guess 'Saw was right all along. This girl is as smart as a
>     lampshade.

Hey, I like that comparison.  Can I use that in the future?
     

155.989ELMAGO::BENBACAI've got Three Knees! :-)Wed Mar 09 1994 13:313
    >> This Girl is as smart as a lampshade
    
    	Yabbut some of em are bright
155.990CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 13:414
>       <<< Note 155.989 by ELMAGO::BENBACA "I've got Three Knees! :-)" >>>


GREAT p-name.....
155.991HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 09 1994 13:4611
  Mentally Kerrigan has proven that she has what it takes to be a good skater.
It's hard to understand why all that much else matters to so many people.

  She skated the best pair of performances of her life and kept the string of
U.S. Olympic medals in her event alive, a string that goes back to '68. I'm not
sure that the U.S. has a streak like that in any other Winter Olympic event. 

  It seems that her relationship with The Mouse is her business and her
intelligence in other matters should be somewhat irrelevant. 

  George 
155.992CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 14:0012
>It's hard to understand why all that much else matters to so many people.

Just keep trying, George.  Maybe it'll hit you....


>  It seems that her relationship with The Mouse is her business and her
>intelligence in other matters should be somewhat irrelevant. 

We never said it was relevant......


'Saw
155.993PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 09 1994 14:039
155.994PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 09 1994 14:044
> I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:
    
    Isn't this the same show you heard someone claim that she knew Nancy
    and Nancy (a two time Olympic medalist) wasn't a good skater?
155.995CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 14:0639
155.996Nope -- gotta read what I write...CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 14:0818
|> I heard it on Imus this morning, and I agree with what Don said:
|    
|    Isn't this the same show you heard someone claim that she knew Nancy
|    and Nancy (a two time Olympic medalist) wasn't a good skater?

No.

I caught that person twice at two different times.  She called into the
Russ Salsberg show, the a couple of days after Nancy was whacked in the
knee -- same day that the Jets coach got canned, because they interrupted
this person's call with the news about Coslett.

Then, a few weeks ago, coming home from drill I caught her again, talking
to Bill Doherty (I think that's his name) on the late show.....


'Saw

155.997Unless of course it was a_anonymous source...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 09 1994 14:149
    Whoever it was, you've got to admit that it took a certain amount of
    chutzpah to go on the radio and claim that you're close enough to 
    the USFSA to know that a near-miss figure skating gold medalist is
    really not that good.  I know that raises the level of credibility for
    me...
    
    glenn
    
155.998HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 09 1994 14:1610
RE       <<< Note 155.992 by CAMONE::WAY "Fire at will!....(Will who?)" >>>

>>It's hard to understand why all that much else matters to so many people.
>
>Just keep trying, George.  Maybe it'll hit you....

  Ok, whack away. We got the medal, the streak is alive, why does all this mouse
stuff matter so much?

  George
155.999CSC32::GAULKEWed Mar 09 1994 14:184
    
    
    NOTES> modify entry sports/file=coffee_talk
    
155.1000CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 14:1919
>
>    Whoever it was, you've got to admit that it took a certain amount of
>    chutzpah to go on the radio and claim that you're close enough to 
>    the USFSA to know that a near-miss figure skating gold medalist is
>    really not that good.  I know that raises the level of credibility for
>    me...
>    

Hey, I just reported what I heard.

I don't really care if she's good or not, quite frankly, but what we're
seeing in a sense is another Mary Lou Retton deal -- except that Mary Lou
knew enough not to dis the hand that was feeding her.

And Kerrigan is as sharp as a marble.....

'Saw
    

155.1001HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 09 1994 14:1914
RE                     <<< Note 155.997 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>

>    Whoever it was, you've got to admit that it took a certain amount of
>    chutzpah to go on the radio and claim that you're close enough to 
>    the USFSA to know that a near-miss figure skating gold medalist is
>    really not that good.  I know that raises the level of credibility for
>    me...
    
  I agree. It sounds like what you would expect from a radio sports call in
program. The line on Kerrigan all year was that she was one of a group that was
capable of winning but that Bauil was the favorite. That Olympic event played
out just about the way the people in the field thought it would. 

  George
155.1002CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 14:206
>  Ok, whack away. We got the medal, the streak is alive, why does all this mouse
>stuff matter so much?

Probably because this is SPORTS.

'Saw
155.1003PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 09 1994 14:255
155.1004HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 09 1994 14:2625
RE       <<< Note 155.1002 by CAMONE::WAY "Fire at will!....(Will who?)" >>>

>>  Ok, whack away. We got the medal, the streak is alive, why does all this mouse
>>stuff matter so much?
>
>Probably because this is SPORTS.

  It's not just sports. This is a major news story that dominated the national
news since the attack, even pushing Whitewater and the war in Bosnia off the
cover of Time and Newsweek. And only about 1/4 to 1/3 of the coverage was
on the sporting event.

  Something about this story has captured the attention of the nation and I
doubt it's figure skating. People get whacked every day, people skate every
day, only a fraction of the Olympic athletes showed up at closing ceremonies
and lots of athletes sign contracts and mouth off but few get the attention
that this story is getting.

  I really don't understand, what makes this such a big deal? I've been
interested in the sport since '68 but lots more than skating fans are following
this story.

  Why do they care what Nancy says to the Mouse?

  George
155.1005Uh, gee, who's perpetuating this?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 09 1994 14:3518
                 
> I don't really care if she's good or not, quite frankly, but what we're
> seeing in a sense is another Mary Lou Retton deal -- except that Mary Lou
> knew enough not to dis the hand that was feeding her.
    
    What I think we're seeing is deadbeat gossip media types like Imus and 
    the like flailing a dead horse that would have been well on its way to
    extinction otherwise.  Like I predicted, we're not seeing Kerrigan on
    every other commercial break and if it weren't for these startling
    revelations that she somehow feels the need to respond to, she'd
    already be onto her niche market.  People *are* sick of it.  Imus' 
    self-sustaining she's-been-paid-to-have-me-beat-her-up-over-how-sick-we-
    all-are-of-seeing-her-beat-up schtick is just self-righteous baloney.
    See it for what it is:  as long as your man Imus can get laughs,
    interest and ratings out of it, he'll ride this pony into eternity...
    
    glenn
      
155.1006MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 09 1994 14:434
    
      Blatant homerism at it's ugliest. A semi-star in a semi-sport with
     terminal foot-in-mouth disease and the local vocals are tripping all
     over themselves defending the hag. What a laugh.
155.1007Oh, I guess *this* is legitimate comic usage... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 09 1994 14:5012
    
>     Blatant homerism at it's ugliest. A semi-star in a semi-sport with
>     terminal foot-in-mouth disease and the local vocals are tripping all
>     over themselves defending the hag. What a laugh.
    
    Should I try the "difference between free speech and rude jokes" speech
    (which I agreed with, btw) applied to your treatment of such 
    superficialities of how Kerrigan sounds, or even worse, what she looks 
    like?
    
    glenn
    
155.1008SWAM1::OHL_TAOuch! Ice burns to the face!Wed Mar 09 1994 14:533
    I want to know what the mouse has to say about all this.
    
    
155.1009Sprot opinion #901 on Nancy etal AKOCOA::BREENWed Mar 09 1994 15:0620
    Nancy Kerrigan is obviously a very intelligent and witty person as
    typified by the "finest Mouse" remark.  To say she is not "nice" is
    to say she doesn't suffer fools well and if the press happens to be
    sensitive about that then it is their problem and we have seen how they
    have responded (exhibit A mr Fitzgerald of the Herald).
    
    As to the skating so much for detente or "end of communism" or
    whatever.  Four Eastern Block Nyets, Four NATO Ouis and a tie(breaker).
    Will someone tell me what is new?
    
    As for Disney Characters, NK is the epitome of the latest Beauties and
    Princesses: a bit of a wise-ass, not necessarily likable (brings out
    the beast in some of us).  I also liked her "cry again" remark.
    
    Interesting from radio call-in that so many of the anti-nk crew were women
    who were plain and simply just jealous.  IMUS btw has eschewed for the
    most part NKvsTHvsSB... mainly because he doesn't have the time.
    
    (and "Bruno",'Saw, is just another of his stable of characters including the
    Cardinal of NY.)
155.1010MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Wed Mar 09 1994 15:3510
 > Should I try the "difference between free speech and rude jokes" speech
 > (which I agreed with, btw) applied to your treatment of such 
 > superficialities of how Kerrigan sounds, or even worse, what she looks 
 > like?
  
   You're right, Glenn. We all know that superficialities have nothing to
   do with how figure skating is judged or who does and doesn't reap the
   endorsements. Okey dokey. I bet poor Nancy cries for days every time an
   acme safe lands on Wile E. Coyote.
    
155.1011I think you knew what I was referring to...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 09 1994 15:3710
    
>   You're right, Glenn. We all know that superficialities have nothing to
>   do with how figure skating is judged or who does and doesn't reap the
>   endorsements.
    
    I didn't realize that having no lips and buck teeth bought you anything
    here... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
155.1012HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 09 1994 15:3717
RE      <<< Note 155.1008 by SWAM1::OHL_TA "Ouch! Ice burns to the face!" >>>

>    I want to know what the mouse has to say about all this.
    
  The Mouse (read "Disney") has spoken. The Mouse says that they don't expect
her to be perfect (read "We already signed the contract").

  They've been playing spin doctor and together with her agent are responsible
for most of the damage control statements (i.e. "I didn't want to brag",
"Oksana is my friend", etc.). 

  Anyway, she won the medal and kept the streak alive. As far as I can see,
she's done her job, time to go make a living doing Ice Shows.

  I still can't understand why this is such a big story.

  George
155.1013CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 16:0415
>
>  I still can't understand why this is such a big story.
>

Ah, Grasshopper....

When you understand why SPORTS is SPORTS and Sports isn't, then will
englightenment shine upon you all the days of your noting life....


Master 'Saw


PS  I wish Hawk was still here for this......

155.1014HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 09 1994 16:1816
RE       <<< Note 155.1013 by CAMONE::WAY "Fire at will!....(Will who?)" >>>

>When you understand why SPORTS is SPORTS and Sports isn't, then will
>englightenment shine upon you all the days of your noting life....

  I guess you were in the head when I wrote earlier that I'm talking about
the way the story has been picked up by the national press, not the SPORTS
notes file.

  Let me try again to try to pick up the spot hit and run readers,

  I still can't understand why this is such a big story WITH THE NATIONAL
PRESS, NOT THE FRIGG'EN SPORTS NOTES FILE!!! 


  George
155.1015CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 16:2934
>
>  I guess you were in the head when I wrote earlier that I'm talking about
>the way the story has been picked up by the national press, not the SPORTS
>notes file.
>

Yeah, I was filmin' my bran commercial 8^)


>  Let me try again to try to pick up the spot hit and run readers,
>
>  I still can't understand why this is such a big story WITH THE NATIONAL
>PRESS, NOT THE FRIGG'EN SPORTS NOTES FILE!!! 


Best guess?  It sells copy.

You or I, probably for different reasons, couldn't give two little turds
about this story, but I guess for most of the rest of the country, who've
never been weaned from Ellison's "Glass Teat", they get a vicarious turn
on from this stuff.  From the beginning with The Attack, through the
current interest, I think that's it.

Now, the other thing too, coupled in with that is that most folks who
believed in the Ice Princess were severely dissappointed when they
saw behind the curtain (Pay No Attention to that Skater Behind the Curtain)
and saw someone who was human.....


I think that's got a lot to do with it....


'Saw

155.1016PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 09 1994 16:545
155.1017DZIGN::ROBICHAUDBreastfed on falsiesWed Mar 09 1994 17:005
    	Are any more of our nation's prominent figure skaters scheduled to
    cry on a major network in the immediate future?  I need to know
    so I can set the VCR.  Thanks in advance.
    
    				/Don 
155.1018CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Wed Mar 09 1994 17:0411
>    
>    If you don't care about this story, why all the comments from you about
>    the talk show call-ins and Nancy's IQ?
>

Maybe I have an ulterior motive, or a hidden agenda?


But, I do find it horribly amusing, in a self-abusive kind of way, 
that Nancy is dumber 'n a stump.....8^)

155.1019yeah it's called the Monterey Whine FestivalFRETZ::HEISERmost corrupt White House everWed Mar 09 1994 17:051
    
155.1020MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 10 1994 12:157
    
         Figure skater Nancy Kerrigan announced that she would be
        donating the money from her SNL appearance to a fund she 
        created to aid children with learning disabilities in her
        Stoneham, Massachusetts neighborhood. It was later explained
        to a red-faced Kerrigan that those 'Slow Children' street
        signs meant something completely different.
155.1021CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu Mar 10 1994 12:285
    Tommy Brydie gets the third Mike Heiser Insensitivity Award.
    Film at 11.
    
    MikeL
    
155.1022CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Thu Mar 10 1994 12:3914
>    Tommy Brydie gets the third Mike Heiser Insensitivity Award.
>    Film at 11.
>    
>    MikeL

Well, I for one have waited a long time to pass coffee through my nose
reading sports.  I haven't done that since MrT left.

So, Tommy did it to me, and he wins my Coffee_In_The_Sinuses Award....


'Saw
    

155.1023MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 10 1994 13:2710
   	In other Kerrigan news. Nancy Kerrigan was spotted yesterday in
       Boston's Faneuil Hall marketplace. Several tourists and locals
       were pleasantly suprised to see Kerrigan holding a prolonged con-
       versation with a lifesized bronze statue of Red Auerbach which is
       posed sitting on one of the benches with his trademark cigar. "He 
       seems nice but he's not very talkative. We talked for 20 minutes 
       and he didn't say a word. I guess he's a Tonya fan" said an ob-
       viously disappointed Kerrigan. 
    
155.1024CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Thu Mar 10 1994 13:364
    You forgot the part when she said the experience was very exciting.
    
    MikeL
    
155.1025all these awards and I didn't even get one yetFRETZ::HEISERimpeach the President and her husbandThu Mar 10 1994 14:191
    Tommy, you're killin' me.
155.1026MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Thu Mar 10 1994 14:508

        In still other Kerrigan news. Mattel has announced that
       a new Nancy doll is in the works. The new doll, which is
       expected to be in stores by June, cries "Why me?", says
       "Give me some money" and also "That Barbie is a slut". A 
       Mattel spokesman says that they expect the doll to be a big 
       seller.
155.1027CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Thu Mar 10 1994 14:5619
>        In still other Kerrigan news. Mattel has announced that
>       a new Nancy doll is in the works. The new doll, which is
>       expected to be in stores by June, cries "Why me?", says
>       "Give me some money" and also "That Barbie is a slut". A 
>       Mattel spokesman says that they expect the doll to be a big 
>       seller.

Will it wet if you feed it Campell's Soup?

Will it comes with its own little pair of Reeboks?


Enquiring and all that....


'Saw



155.1028PTOVAX::JACOBIt rains toads...Thu Mar 10 1994 18:407
    
>>Will it comes with its own little pair of Reeboks?
    
    No, but it WILL breath heavy for a while.
    
    JaKe
    
155.1029SWAM1::OHL_TAOuch! Ice burns to the face!Thu Mar 10 1994 20:034
    I wonder who will be making the Tanya doll.  It can have the "G.I Joe"
    action arm.  Just lock it back and push the release button.  WHAM!!
    
    
155.1030Nancy on SNLOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Fri Mar 11 1994 12:586
    So what will Nancy do on SNL tomorrow night? I heard on the news that
    cast members have said that she is real sweet and shy and that she is
    not comfortable doing the skits.  She will play Snow White in one of
    them.
    
    
155.1031CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Fri Mar 11 1994 13:0513
>
>    So what will Nancy do on SNL tomorrow night? I heard on the news that
>    cast members have said that she is real sweet and shy and that she is
>    not comfortable doing the skits.  She will play Snow White in one of
>    them.
>    

Well, from the spot I saw last night we already know she can't sing....


I might watch it though, just to see Aretha.....
    

155.1032MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Fri Mar 11 1994 13:133
    the opening monologue will be painful
    The Crazy Met
    
155.1033HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Mar 11 1994 14:2210
  SNL has a formula for working with hosts that have no talent. They minimize
the number of skits they have to do, they arrange the skits to minimize their
lines, and they bring someone else out immediately to help with the opening
monologue. 

  About all she'll have to do on her own is say: "Ladies and Gentlemen, Arithia
Franklen" a couple times and she'll do fine. How can you lose when you get to
introduce one of the greatest singers that ever lived? 

  George
155.1034So what's the big deal?CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementFri Mar 11 1994 15:372
    
    
155.1035HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Mar 11 1994 15:439
RE       <<< Note 155.1034 by CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management" >>>

                          -< So what's the big deal? >-

  Beats me, did someone say there was a big deal?

  If so, what got dealt?

  George
155.1036FRETZ::HEISERimpeach the President and her husbandFri Mar 11 1994 15:516
>  About all she'll have to do on her own is say: "Ladies and Gentlemen, Arithia
>Franklen" a couple times and she'll do fine. How can you lose when you get to
    >introduce one of the greatest singers that ever lived? 
    
    George, admittedly she's one of the greatest, but at least pay her some
    R-E-S-P-E-C-T and spell her name right.  It's Urethra.
155.1037CAMONE::WAYFire at will!....(Will who?)Fri Mar 11 1994 15:545
>    R-E-S-P-E-C-T and spell her name right.  It's Urethra.


Not to be confused with her twin sisters Vulva and Uvula....

155.1038or the Labia twinsFRETZ::HEISERimpeach the President and her husbandFri Mar 11 1994 15:581
    
155.1039PTOVAX::JACOBIt rains toads...Fri Mar 11 1994 18:358
    Or the Lee sisters,
    
    
    Ug and Home
    
    
    JaKe
    
155.1040MKFSA::LONGThat's my story and I'm stickin' to it!Fri Mar 11 1994 18:496
	Did you mention the Witt trips...

	Half, Dim and Nit


	
155.1041PTOVAX::JACOBIt rains toads...Fri Mar 11 1994 20:127
    And then there's the Off Bros.
    
    
    You cain figger it out..
    
    JaKe
    
155.1042HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Mar 14 1994 19:178
  It appears that the World Championship Figure Skating will be on in prime
time after all. According to the Globe, CBS is handing the Tonya problem off to
NBC which is planning 4 hours of prime time coverage of the World Figure
Skating Championship which takes place next week in Japan. 

  It will not necessarily be same day or next day coverage. 

  George 
155.1043QUASER::JACKSONTALong lost recipeTue Mar 15 1994 01:254
      Did I miss the note of Kerrigan on SNL?  I didn't see it,  just
    curious of opinions/reactions of her "performance"...
    
      Tim
155.1044CSOA1::ROPERTue Mar 15 1994 01:314
    Tim, she struggled when she had to string more than 2 words together! 
    She obviously was out of her element.
    
    - Rope
155.1045HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 12:4411
  They did their usual weak host formula of planning the skits so that she was
always surrounded by regulars and never had much to say. She fumbled somewhat
with the lines that she had but the skits were pretty good so it ended up being
one of the better programs. She almost always appeared with Phil Hartman who
is outstanding at handling nervous hosts.

  The part where she skated pairs with Chris Farley was a riot.

  Aretha Franklen was great. Her best song was the last one, Chain of Fools.

  George
155.1046The WBC do what they doCTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Tue Mar 15 1994 12:448
    Jeez I don't think she was that bad Rope. Hail she's had limited
    access to public appearances where she's had to perform (speak)
    at length but she showed me she had the bottle. She musta been
    nervous but handled it OK. However Mssr Brydie will liken her
    performance to that of well-known thespian Leon Spinks.
    
    MikeL
    
155.1047HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 12:499
  The latest word on Tonya Harding is that she's been offered $2 million by a
Japanese businessman to become a wrestler. He says she has the perfect build
for the sport and feels she would do well. He'd like her to wrestle when she is
in Japan for the World Figure Skating championships next week. 

  It wasn't clear if professional wrestling in Japan is a real sport like
college wrestling or just a side show as wrestling is in the United States. 

  George
155.1048PassableOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Tue Mar 15 1994 12:514
    What I saw wasn't bad. As noted previously,SNL did a good job of
    covering her weaknesses and giving her no chance to mess up.
    
    I liked the trio they had playing Harding,Giloolly and Sean Eckert.
155.1049exMSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 15 1994 13:516
    
    >> It wasn't clear if professional wrestling in Japan is a real 
    >> sport like college wrestling or just a side show as wrestling 
    >> is in the United States. 
    
       I hope you're kidding.
155.1050HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 14:1424
RE       <<< Note 155.1049 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>    >> It wasn't clear if professional wrestling in Japan is a real 
>    >> sport like college wrestling or just a side show as wrestling 
>    >> is in the United States. 
>    
>       I hope you're kidding.

  Ok now let me guess. Are you griping about the fact that I called college
wrestling a real sport, professional wrestling a side show, or the fact that
I don't know how to categorize Japanese wrestling?

  Could be the 1st, college wrestling is not a real sport. After all since it's
not college basketball it's not pure with the pearls in the safe and what not.

  Then again, maybe you're a big Hulk Hogan fan and don't like me dissing your
favorite past time. 

  Or could be that the Japanese Sumo diving ad has you convinced that Japanese
wrestling is not a sport.

  I give up, which one is it?

  George
155.1051PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 14:256
    It's very easy to figure out, George.  If a professional "sport" is
    willing to offer big bucks to someone who has never performed that
    "sport" in their lives, surely the question of is it sport or is it
    entertainment masquerading as sport is answered.
    
    Kind of like when Gastineau and Chamberlain were enticed to boxing...
155.1052MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 15 1994 14:3111
 >> Ok now let me guess. Are you griping about the fact that I called 
 >> college wrestling a real sport, professional wrestling a side show, 
 >> or the fact that I don't know how to categorize Japanese wrestling?

     I ain't "griping", George. Just a little surprised that you'd actually
     think that someone would pay Tonya 2 million samolians to wrestle under
     strict amateur rules. How many people besides yourself would pay money
     for that? Zero, that's how many. Obviously, they must have the equiv-
     alent of a ladies WWF over there. Jeesh.
    
155.1053HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 14:3115
RE             <<< Note 155.1051 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>    It's very easy to figure out, George.  If a professional "sport" is
>    willing to offer big bucks to someone who has never performed that
>    "sport" in their lives, surely the question of is it sport or is it
>    entertainment masquerading as sport is answered.
>    
>    Kind of like when Gastineau and Chamberlain were enticed to boxing...

  ... Or like Michael Jordan being offered money to play baseball for the White
Sox (i.e. Baseball is not a sport).

  Ok, I understand. It's not college basketball so it's not a sport.

  George
155.1054CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksTue Mar 15 1994 14:452
Boy, I hope OSHA doesn't get a hold of this.  There are so many 
non-sequiturs flying around here, they could put someone's eye out!
155.1055WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MGive me LIBERTY or give me....Tue Mar 15 1994 14:553
    
    
       Is Curling a sport?
155.1056PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 15:023
155.1057DZIGN::ROBICHAUDBreaking The LawTue Mar 15 1994 15:084
    	Hey, are youze guys insinuating that pro 'rasslin ain't on the
    up and up?
    
    				   /Don
155.1058FRETZ::HEISERimpeach the President and her husbandTue Mar 15 1994 15:103
    >       Is Curling a sport?
    
    If it would put the Zamboni out of business, it isn't a sport.
155.1059MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 15 1994 15:1114
	I have to agree with George in this one.

	Saying that Japanese wrestling can't be a sport because
	someone is willing to pay $$$ Tonya Harding to wrestle is EXACTLY
	the same as saying baseball isn't a sport because Michael Jordan,
	who hasn't played since high school, is being given a chance to
	play in spring training (and apparently will be playing at the
	higher minor league level).  Or, similarly, because Milwaukee
	drafted Charlie Ward last year.

	Also, since the Dallas Cowboys alledgedly approached Ben Johnson about
	becoming a wide receiver after his drug-enhanced Olympics, perhaps
	we ought to rethink whether football ought to be considered a real
	sport.
155.1060HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 15:2513
  I don't think that you can rule something out as a sport just because someone
runs a money making gimmick. If you did, then replacing the NFL Championship
game with the Hyper Bowl ... excuse me ... Super Bowl would rule out NFL
football as a sport. Then there are all the things they do at baseball games
like hat day, glove day, bankers day, underwear day and what ever else they
run.

  With dwindling TV money, there's a lot of pressure on various sports these
days to do what ever is necessary to raise money. I think we'll see a lot
more hype in all sorts of sports before we see less so yes it's a reasonable
question to ask whether Japanese wrestling is a sport or a side show.

  George
155.1061PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 15:2814
    You're kidding, right Rick?
    
    The Jordan case is close, but he has at least played baseball before
    and has a chance of at least making a minor league team based on his
    athletic ability (minor league salaries are significantly less than
    what Harding is reportedly being offered).  Charlie Ward is in the
    starting lineup of his college basketball team -- is it really that far
    a reach to think he might play basketball?  The Cowboys offered Ben
    Johnson a tryout.  Did they cut him a check for $1 mil and order a
    uniform for him?  I think not.  There is also precedent for track stars
    having tools applicable to some of the specialty positions in football.
    
    Are you going to tell me that Harding's figure skating career has
    prepared her for a stint at professional wrestling?
155.1062MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 15 1994 15:449
    
      I thought it was intuitively obvious that Harding was being offered
     a contract for professional WWF-style ladies wrasslin'. They showed
     a clip of it this AM on ESPN and I guess they expect Tonya to be the
     '90s equivalent of the Fabulous Moola over in Japan. It's beyond me 
     that anyone could really expect Tonya to strap on head gear and get 
     on a real wrestling mat and wrestle legit. As if someone would pay to 
     see that. Jeesh.
     
155.1063HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 15:4416
  Jordan hasn't played baseball since highschool and he will probably be making
over $50,000. How many people can you name outside of entertainment and politics
who make that much money on something for which they have showed no talent. 

  Also, how many other guys with his level of talent in highschool baseball who
haven't played for 10 years get the chance he got with that much attention by a
major league coaching staff. Wasn't Heinrick himself watching over his batting
practice. 

  I believe that Jordan was signed to create excitement and to keep him happy
in case he decides to go back to basketball. It's all hype pure and simple but
that doesn't mean baseball is not a sport, that's just the reality of running
sports as a business in this day and age. They do what they feel they have to
do. 

  George 
155.1067PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 16:0616
155.1068MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 15 1994 16:0611
 > Ok so then based on that are you saying that baseball is obviously 
 > not a sport because they signed Jordan? If not, then what possible 
 > reason could they have for signing him that is baseball related?

   George, you're lost again or you're changing subjects. I'm saying it 
   is/was obvious to every, apparently except you, that Tonya is/was being 
   offered a contract to WWF-style wrestle. I didn't say anything about 
   Jordan, baseball or Jordan playing baseball. That Jordan thing is covered 
   in note 7.
    
155.1069PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 16:075
155.1070No sportSPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOTue Mar 15 1994 16:227
>    >       Is Curling a sport?
>    
>    If it would put the Zamboni out of business, it isn't a sport.

	then it ain't a sport sez me!

	flying zamboni
155.1071MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 15 1994 16:2712
155.1073TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHWhitewater&lt;&lt;&lt;Contra (Bush knew)Tue Mar 15 1994 16:3614
Uhhh, just for some clarification:

My wife's cousin wrestled in HS in Conneticut, where the assistant coach on 
the team was Bob Backlund (former WWF champ).  I went to a meet one day, and 
spoke to Backlund.  I asked him if he still wrestled, and he told me he goes 
to Japan once a year, where they "really wrestle, none of the WWF garbage". (Of
course he since went back to the WWF garbage for the WWF dollars.)

This, however, is the firsted I've heard of the Tonya Harding as a wrestler
thang.

hth

=Bob=
155.1074CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksTue Mar 15 1994 16:3815
>over $50,000. How many people can you name outside of entertainment and politics
>who make that much money on something for which they have showed no talent. 

Uh, the Digital management teams?


>  Also, how many other guys with his level of talent in highschool baseball who
>haven't played for 10 years get the chance he got with that much attention by a
>major league coaching staff. Wasn't Heinrick himself watching over his batting
>practice. 

The Natural....



155.1075PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 16:4026
155.1076CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksTue Mar 15 1994 16:413
George might not be lost or changing subjects, but he is guilty of wide
ranging generalizations based upon a single case.

155.1079PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 17:2020
155.1080PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 17:237
155.1081PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 17:2716
155.1082CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksTue Mar 15 1994 17:3315
>  Rewinding to a checkpoint and going forward again ...
>
>  Ok, so do you agree with me when I say that you can not tell whether pro
>wrestling in japan is or is not a sport based on the one offer given to Harding
>or do you agree with Mac and Brydie that the offer alone means that pro
>wrestling in Japan is not a sport?

Uh, does it really matter?


>  They are the ones making the generalization from the small amount of evidence,
>not me.

Keep that stuff up George, and we're gonna start calling you the
Teflon Noter.....
155.1084CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksTue Mar 15 1994 17:476
>  The personality involved, Tonya Harding, has consistently been one of the top
>10 athletes in her sport for most of the past 5 years. She's won two U.S.
>Championships including the one in '91 where she beat the next year's Olympic
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

So is this like repetitive behavior here for her, or what?
155.1086MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 15 1994 18:0611
    
  > No, George.  Noone said money was THE reason.  The amount of money, the
  > personality involved, and the reputation that professional wrestling
  > has earned led us to that conclusion.

    Of course, the video of masked and unmasked women in skimpy superhero 
    garb could be interpreted either way.
    
    We're not talking about sumo wrestling here, George. That Tonya Harding
    weighs about 130 pounds and there are women much much larger than that 
    would have been a clue for most folks.
155.1088CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksTue Mar 15 1994 18:1223
>  If you don't give a rip, just hit "next unseen". 
>
>                              I think it's down there
>                                                      \
>                                                       \
>                                                        \
>                                                         \|
>                                                         -
>
>  George


Hey, NitMeister, I don't need you to tell me where next unseen is.

Anyone who's on the ball and heard the report doesn't have to be
a rocket scientist to figure that they're not gonna pay Tonya $2mill to
participate in a legit wrestling organization.   

Further, whether he's right or not, Tommy's arguments are much more
consistant, and much better constructed....


'Saw
155.1090PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 18:2414
155.1091MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 15 1994 18:3913
   >> Also, even a video showing skimpy superhero garb does not necessarily 
   >> mean that the outcome of the events is scripted and rehearsed as it is 
   >> with U.S. pro wrestling so they still could be actually competing which 
   >> would make it a sport.

     There are lots of legitimate sports where the women where skimpy super-
     hero-type outfits, call themseleves things like the Dragon Queen and
     spit at the crowd.

     Loosen your tie and take a deep breath, George. I don't think you're
     getting enough oxygen to your brain.
    
155.1093HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 18:4918
RE       <<< Note 155.1091 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>     There are lots of legitimate sports where the women where skimpy super-
>     hero-type outfits, call themseleves things like the Dragon Queen and
>     spit at the crowd.

  Pro Wrestling in the United States is not a sport. There is no competition.
The performers decide ahead of time not only who will win but what they will
do, what they will say, and how they will say it. They then hold rehearsals, not
practice and they go put on a performance, not a competition. 

  It is not at all clear whether or not Japanese wrestling is in that category
or not. Regardless of what they wear and how they behave, they may or may not
compete, we don't know. If they do, then regardless of how much hype, and
regardless of how distasteful you may find it to be, it is a sport, not a
performance. 

  George
155.1095PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 18:535
155.1096PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 18:552
    OK, enlighten me George.  Just exactly what was your point in bringing
    up Tonya's skating career and sumo wrestling?
155.1097HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 15 1994 19:0423
155.1098LDUC at it's finestMKFSA::LONGThat's my story and I'm stickin' to it!Tue Mar 15 1994 19:058
	Ah, the sight of continuous "Did not!" "Did too!" notes....

	SPROTS the way it was meant to be.  Fun times in the ol' Tavern
	again.



	billl
155.1100PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 15 1994 19:1414
155.1101Sports EntertainmentBSS::MENDEZTue Mar 15 1994 20:1214
    Every now and then I listen to a 24 hour sports radio program.  They
    talked about the offer to Harding for wrestling in Japan.  The
    offer was 2 million and the japanese businessman was quoted as
    saying that "Tonya would be the bad girl of wrestling for a
    couple of years but that she could develop into being a heroine".
    
    The fact that somebody would have to be a "goodguy" or "badguy"
    indicates to me that it is sports entertainment NOT a Sport.
    
    Frank Mendez
    
    P.S.  I have been known to watch the wwf periodically and it is called
    sports entertainment.
    
155.1102METSNY::francusMets in '94Tue Mar 15 1994 20:159
Football has the bad guys - Dallas Cowboys - and the good guys - everyone
else - but is still considered a sport.
Basketball has the bad guys - Boston Celtics - and the good guys - everyone
else - but is still considered a sport.

HtH :-)

The Crazy Met

155.1103Now that's a real sport!AIMHI::KERRNo Wonder it Doesn't Work, It's BrokeWed Mar 16 1994 11:416
    
    Hey, can we get this discussion back to the really important stuff.  Just
    how skimpy are those costumes, anyway?
    
    Al :-)
    
155.1104izzit a sport? Entertainment? Competition????CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 16 1994 12:5146

	Yabbut thisted entire LDUC really really has me confused now and
Ah need some clarification.

Background:

	At home I have what I think is a athlete but it runs on a weird cycle.
See at Tzero, it turns on and begins to absorb whatever is around.  Then, while
the absorbtion is still in process, usually there's also a_expulsion, anywhere
from T15 to T60.  Then, usually around T120 everything shuts down and enters
a "refresh" mode.
	I understand that during the daytime, the "refresh" mode frequently
lasts around 2.5 - 3 hours but I have personally observed that the refresh
mode changes after sundown to (if'n yer lucky) maybe 90 minutes.  Fortunately
the athlete realizes the importance of a well developed respiratory system
so at the end of the refresh cycle, practice begins and one of the most
favorite exercises is the technique of opening up the airway to it's maximum
diameter, inhaling the maximum volume of air and expelling it as quickly as
possible while simultanously making audible sounds to confirm that the
exercise is being properly performed.

Please Clarify:

	Almost at random times during the Tzero-T120 cycle, one of the coaches
enters a violent competitive situation with the athlete.  First, the skimpy
costume is partially removed and a "tug-of-war/leg-rassling" fight starts.
Sorta like legs and thighs vs. a hand.  Of course, there's the regular
"rubdown" that boxers get and the application of ointment.  Unfortunately,
neither of the participants are getting financially rewarded.

	Is the above to be considered entertainment, a sport, or true
competition????????

Feel free to make further inquiries if you need more information.  I'd hate
for people to jump to conclusions or make false assumptions.  ;^)


I remain,
one of the coaches
Kev





155.1105BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredWed Mar 16 1994 13:057

	Kev,

	What the hail are you talking about?

	Kevin
155.1106HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 16 1994 13:245
RE                     <<< Note 155.1104 by CSTEAM::FARLEY >>>

  Do you have a brother Chris living at home?

  George
155.1107TNPUBS::ALVEYBono, you ARE mainstream...Wed Mar 16 1994 13:593
On this date in 1991, the U.S. became the first nation
ever to sweep the World Figgerskating Champs as
K.Yamaguchi, T.Harding, and N.Kerrigan finished 1-2-3.
155.1108Some judges prefer one loud boom, others prefer a songhCNTROL::CHILDSG. Maiewski - Rookie of the YearWed Mar 16 1994 14:108
Kev,  given the enjoyment of the expulsion part of the exercise I would
say this is entertainment (although usually confined to one's onself).
Of course I suspose at work in ajoining stalls we could turn it into a
sport but the judging would probably be purely subjective just like
figure skating..........

mike
155.1109Bud Lite could combine Diaper Changing and a exercise program?CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 16 1994 14:2521
    
    Yabbut Mike,
    
    There are elements of all three and that's why I need help.
    
    1) True, the outcome is predetermined (since the coach outweights
       the athlete_in_development and will not surrender.  
       Therefore it could be classified entertainment (like WWF and 
       figgerskating).
    
    2) but.....to the a_i_t, who doesn't either know about the
    predestination, it's pure competition!
    
    3) and, since there is physical combat to determine who will be
       victorious - eventually - it could be a sport!
    
    
    I remain,
    you should see the pile of discarded "skimpy costumes" she has tossed!
    Kev
    
155.1110hth?CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 16 1994 14:2919
    
    re: "what the hail are you talking about?"
    
    	Kevin,
    
    Think about it.......  If ya need a hint, I'll give ya one.
    
    I think about 18-24 months ago, you were having 3 times the coaching/
    wrestling/enjoyment.....
    
    ;^)
    
    I ain't complaining about this winter sports activity though because,
    as RCASO would say, " I AM TO BLAM!!!!!!!!"
    
    I remain,
    and BLAM I did, too!
    Kev
    
155.1111Turds, man, it's about turds..........CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksWed Mar 16 1994 14:3928
>    1) True, the outcome is predetermined (since the coach outweights
>       the athlete_in_development and will not surrender.  
>       Therefore it could be classified entertainment (like WWF and 
>       figgerskating).
    

Well, not all utterly hopeless situations are entertainment, unless you're
looking at a broad, Germanic sense of angst, self-sacrifice for the
greater glory of all, and the utmost in valor.

The outcome of the Charge of the Light Brigade was probalby pre-determined
to, but there's not a military buff around who doesn't see it in a 
different way.


In that context, the athlete_in_develpment could probably fulfill all
of the requirements of a CMH candidate:   intrepidity and gallantry
at risk of life above and beyond the call of duty, and the call of
duty is what it's all about.


Then again, I'm sure in a sense, it's a microcosm of life -- the oppressed
and overpowered athlete_in_development making one small, perhaps stinky,
statement of protestation in the face of superior strength......


Valhalla I am coming,
'Saw
155.1112PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 16 1994 15:022
    Kev, et.al, it you insist on keeping this discussion alive, please take
    it to 27 where it belongs (or maybe try the PARENTING conference).
155.1113he probably got a complex & needs to "lord" over the litle guyCSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 16 1994 15:4820
    
    
    	Yabbut Mtm,
    
    I tried man, I really, really tried to post it in 27 but just as I
    was ready to <control z> it...ah...a big guy, no actually 4 of them
    actually, carrying big clubs, attacked me and threatend to do a Homer
    Simpson (eat these shorts, maan) if I didn't put it in 155!!!!  I tried
    to fight them off but was afraid they'd mash my mug into a pile of
    Digger_the_Goat_Dawg's freshest land mines....did I mention that they
    had clubs before?????  I meant guns...really BIG guns too.....all 11
    of them had guns so I had no choice!
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    wondering howcome *I* get picked on, look at the last 50 and decide
    :^(
    Kev
    
155.1114CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementWed Mar 16 1994 15:5311
    I've seen the Japanese wrestling programs on TV when traveling to Hong
    Kong and Taiwan on the Star Network.  Hear me now and believe me later,
    it is *very* much like the WWF, only worse.
    
    George, why did you delete all those notes?  Reminds me of the
    disappearing acts you used to pull on Soapbox.
    
    Finally, duck huntin *is* a sport, but pls take that argument to the
    hunting note.
    
    Mark.
155.1115CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 16 1994 16:018
    
    
    	Yabbut now we're on a roll.....
    
    Are there compulsories in Japanese wrestling?
    
    ??????
    
155.1116HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 16 1994 16:3716
RE       <<< Note 155.1114 by CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management" >>>

>    George, why did you delete all those notes?  Reminds me of the
>    disappearing acts you used to pull on Soapbox.

  So I clean up after myself. Last week you were complaining that I was
eating up too much disk space and this week you are complaining because
I give it back. Make up your mind.

>    Finally, duck huntin *is* a sport, but pls take that argument to the
>    hunting note.
    
  If it belongs in a different note then why are you arguing it here?

  Ok, off to the hunting note,
  George
155.1117CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksWed Mar 16 1994 20:177
>  So I clean up after myself. Last week you were complaining that I was
>eating up too much disk space and this week you are complaining because
>I give it back. Make up your mind.
>

Sounds like a MrT disappearing act, actually......

155.1118DZIGN::ROBICHAUDComingSoon-TheTonyaHardingStoryThu Mar 17 1994 11:383
    	Yeah but 'Saw, we *missed* MrT's notes.
    
    				/Don
155.1119CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksThu Mar 17 1994 12:108
>    	Yeah but 'Saw, we *missed* MrT's notes.
>    
>    				/Don
>


True, and Jeff did go back and pull them all out from the archives.
No way in hell I'd do that with George's.....
155.1120HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 17 1994 13:2711
RE  <<< Note 155.1119 by CAMONE::WAY "Aiming for pb cookies with fork marks" >>>

>True, and Jeff did go back and pull them all out from the archives.
>No way in hell I'd do that with George's.....

  Actually that was a pretty stupid discussion on both sides. I went through
and weeded out a lot of junk and I'd suggest others do that as well. I'm not
the only one who was not contributing to anyone's collectibles with that
discussion. 

  George 
155.1121CAMONE::WAYAiming for pb cookies with fork marksThu Mar 17 1994 13:3310
>  Actually that was a pretty stupid discussion on both sides. I went through
>and weeded out a lot of junk and I'd suggest others do that as well. I'm not
                                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Guess you haven't spent much time around these parts.....

But, we'll take it under advisement.....



155.1122Anybody watch the World Figure Skating Championships.OURGNG::RIGGENAtlanta Braves, Buffalo Bills, UNC Tar HeelsMon Mar 28 1994 16:104
Didn't think that without a good smack on the knee anybody would watch 
just plain old figure skating. 

Jeff
155.1123FRETZ::HEISERShoveling that sunshineMon Mar 28 1994 16:173
    Kerrigan, Bauil, Bonaly, Elvis, Petrenko, and a host of others will be
    skating here in June.  My wife wanted to see them but only nosebleed
    seats are left at $30/each.
155.1124SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dMon Mar 28 1994 16:195
    
    C'mon Mike.  It'll be 110 here in June.  Think of the AC money you
    could save.
    
    brews
155.1125FRETZ::HEISERShoveling that sunshineMon Mar 28 1994 16:191
    Already taken care of since we'll be gone the whole month of July.
155.1126HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Mar 28 1994 21:5328
RE<<< Note 155.1122 by OURGNG::RIGGEN "Atlanta Braves, Buffalo Bills, UNC Tar Heels" >>>

>           -< Anybody watch the World Figure Skating Championships. >-

  I saw the men skate on Friday, the pairs short program on Saturday afternoon
and the pairs final Sunday night. I missed the Saturday night show but from
what I heard Surya Bonaly France wasn't too happy with her 2nd place finish
and protested on the medal stand. The woman from Japan came in 1st place and
over in the skating notes file they seem to be saying that it was the correct
call.

  Michele Kwan did ok. She came in 8th which was good enough to get the U.S.
two positions for next year. She's a pretty hot prospect for being in medal
contention in the '96-'98 time frame.

  The woman in the Canadian pairs overcame a lot of pain from a broken rib
and they came in 2nd. A Russian couple won the gold medal. The U.S. pairs
also had injury problems as well as equipment problems and managed 6th or
7th which is good for 2 positions on next year's team.

  Elvis Stoko (sp?) from Canada won the men's title and the guy from France
who does the God Father stuff came in 2nd. Elvis managed to land a quad triple
combination and skated a clean performance that would have defeated anyone.

  Most of the big names from the Olympics didn't show up due to either injury,
retirement, or felony convictions.

  George
155.1127CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementTue Mar 29 1994 01:029
    Michele Kwan did okay???
    
    She looked like she was ready to pass peach stones and fell on her
    kiester halfway through her routine.
    
    Granted, she's just a youngster, but to say she did "alright" is a bit
    much.
    
    Mark.
155.1128HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 03:2027
RE       <<< Note 155.1127 by CAPNET::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Product Management" >>>

>    Michele Kwan did okay???
>    She looked like she was ready to pass peach stones and fell on her
>    kiester halfway through her routine.
>    Granted, she's just a youngster, but to say she did "alright" is a bit
>    much.

  In skating, making the Nationals is considered really good. Making the
national team is considered very good. A top 10 finish at a major international
event like the Olympics or World Championships is outstanding. 

  In the Skating notes file someone said that she did two triple lutzes and a
triple flip. That's a pretty aggressive program. Remember, in the long program
skaters are rated on what they do, not what they fail to do as they are if they
miss mandatory elements in the short program. 

  By finishing in the top 10 she also earned the U.S. a 2nd spot on next year's
national team. Only by winning a medal could she have won the 3rd spot which
would have been pretty amazing for a 13 year old kid. Granted Oksana Bauil did
it last year but that's pretty unusual.

  Considering her age, the fact that she was an alternate, and the fact that it
was her 1st time in international competition at the senior level she did
really well by just about any standard, 

  George
155.1129DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Tue Mar 29 1994 12:595
    	Stoyko did the quad OK, but didn't finish the triple. My
    	wife and I happened to watch it last night. Just slightly
    	short on the triple.
    
    	Scott
155.1130Break the rules and still win?STRATA::HUITue Mar 29 1994 14:4916
I am still confuse how the Russian won the ice dancing considering they fell in
the long program. It was right in front of the judges and it was clearly a
mistake.
        
I would have to give the gold to the Fins.  

I also don't understand how they can break the rules that is clearly written
and still not be disqualify in this sport. Why even have the rules if it is
going to be broken anyway. Is just is not fair to the competitors who stick by
the rules.  

I think this will be the last ice dancing I will ever watch. I am boycotting
this what so call sport. 

Dave 

155.1131HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 15:4029
RE                      <<< Note 155.1130 by STRATA::HUI >>>
>                      -< Break the rules and still win? >-

>I am still confuse how the Russian won the ice dancing considering they fell in
>the long program. It was right in front of the judges and it was clearly a
>mistake.

  I didn't see it but in general a fall does not mean you can't win. Skaters
in ice dancing are judged on several things including synchronization, deep
edges, how well they follow the form of the dance, and several other things.

  It's like asking how can a player on a baseball team commit an error and
they still win the ball game? Well they win because errors, like falls in
skating, are only one aspect. Other things count as well. 

>I also don't understand how they can break the rules that is clearly written
>and still not be disqualify in this sport. Why even have the rules if it is
>going to be broken anyway. Is just is not fair to the competitors who stick by
>the rules.  

  Does a baseball player get disqualified if he breaks a rule? For example,
if a pitcher breaks the rules and fakes a pitch home then throws to 1st do
they disqualify his team and declare the other team the winner or do they just
call a balk and give the runner 2nd base?

  In Ice dancing if you break a rule there is either a mandatory deduction or
you don't get points for the move depending on when you do it. 

  George 
155.1132MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 29 1994 15:4911
    
     The real answer is that the standings in (non-sport) Ice Dancing
    are predetermined and can only be changed by a papal decree. There
    is no such thing as an upset, no such thing as a surprise finish.
    The analogy to baseball doesn't wash because the results in base-
    ball are tangible meaning an actual running score is kept. You could
    suffer from an error but it is dependent upon the situation. In (non-
    sport) Ice Dancing, how much you suffer from an error is completely
    dependent upon the judges and the capricious manner with which
    they apply the rules. The less prestige that you have, the more 
    you will be marked down.
155.1133HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 16:5022
RE       <<< Note 155.1132 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>     The real answer is that the standings in (non-sport) Ice Dancing
>    are predetermined and can only be changed by a papal decree. There
>    is no such thing as an upset, no such thing as a surprise finish.

  You keep saying this but each time you do you just prove how little you know
about ice dancing which is why you have so little credibility when you discuss
this topic. 

  Answer this one, why did Torvell and Dean lose the gold medal in the Olympics
to the Russians after beating them in the European Championship just a month
earlier? Their reputation was the same, the only change during the month
between the two events was to their program including some lifts that the
judges didn't seem to like. 

  If your theory is true and the order is predetermined, then the order of the
European skaters should have been the same in both events regardless of what
they did on the ice but it was not. They went from 1st to 3rd. How could that
have possibly happened? 

  George
155.1134CAMONE::WAYValorTue Mar 29 1994 17:085
>judges didn't seem to like. 


This is the crux of the matter in a nutshell....

155.1135HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 17:1616
RE                  <<< Note 155.1134 by CAMONE::WAY "Valor" >>>

>judges didn't seem to like. 
This is the crux of the matter in a nutshell....

  Right, just like saying "Umpires don't seem to like..." when calling
balls and strikes.

  Now how long will Byrds and Way duck the question which obviously they
can't answer, if the judging is predetermined why did Torvell and Dean beat
the Russians in the European Championships in January then lose to them in
the Olympics a month later?

  Duck and weave, duck and weave, toss up insults as a smoke screen ...

  George
155.1136CAMONE::WAYValorTue Mar 29 1994 17:3721
>  Now how long will Byrds and Way duck the question which obviously they
>can't answer, if the judging is predetermined why did Torvell and Dean beat
>the Russians in the European Championships in January then lose to them in
>the Olympics a month later?

Why do we have to answer any of your questions, George?  It's not like
we're measuring ourselves on our knowledge of anything or our debating
ability.

Ice Dancing is about as much of a sport as Maypole Dancing.....  That's
all I need to know.   As to the judging, it's laughable due to all the
agendas that each judge has....

You'd be closer in your analogy of judges to refs, if you went with something
like pass interference in football.   Balls and strikes either are or they
aren't on or off the plate.   The zone is high or low dependent on positioning.
At least with the PI call, the ref must call based on his judgement of
intent and all that crap.


'Saw
155.1137HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 17:5125
RE                  <<< Note 155.1136 by CAMONE::WAY "Valor" >>>

>Why do we have to answer any of your questions, George?  It's not like
>we're measuring ourselves on our knowledge of anything or our debating
>ability.

  I disagree. If you look at the attacks on ice dancing and on the people who
argue that it is a sport it is obvious that there is a very aggressive debate
going on. Byrdie manages to plop a slam against figure skating into just about
everything he and I discuss regardless of the topic.

  Anyway, if you don't have an answer you don't have one. And it's no big
mystery why. The premise that ice dancing is predetermined and that performance
on the ice doesn't matter is just plane wrong. 

  You can go on banging your fist on your keyboard insisting that it is not
a sport but you can't answer a simple question, if ice dancing is predetermined
then why did Torvell and Dean beat the Russians in the European Championship
then lose to them a month later with a program that was loaded with illegal
lifts?

  It's obvious, they lost the Olympics on the Ice and the judging was basically
correct. 

  George
155.1138CAMONE::WAYValorTue Mar 29 1994 17:5919
>  I disagree. If you look at the attacks on ice dancing and on the people who
>argue that it is a sport it is obvious that there is a very aggressive debate
>going on. Byrdie manages to plop a slam against figure skating into just about
>everything he and I discuss regardless of the topic.

Well, Georgie Boy, if you wanna measure yourself on something as silly
as ice dancing, and debating about it, hey, more power to ya, bud.












155.1139DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Tue Mar 29 1994 18:121
    	I think we've plumbed the depths of this rathole before.
155.1140plumbing, while messy, in no sportHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaTue Mar 29 1994 18:130
155.1141MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 29 1994 18:268
    
     I'll answer your question, Meow-ski. If anything your little
    example provesd what I've been saying all along. Torville and 
    Dean *supposedly* commit this violation (no one has actually come
    out and said that's why they got rooked) and yet still manage to
    take a medal. Meanwhile, the Finns skate a fine program but can't
    crack the medals. Why? The results are determined before the
    event ever begins.
155.1142At least they're out of the bc noteAKOCOA::BREENTill Time Shall be no MoreTue Mar 29 1994 18:271
    
155.1143Double standard?CTHQ::LEARYIt'sBeenALongTimeComing...Tue Mar 29 1994 18:505
    So is Kerrigan still the whiny sore loser or has Bonaly "won" that
    medal?
    
    MikeL
    
155.1144HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 19:0024
RE       <<< Note 155.1141 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

  No, you ducked my question again. Here it is:

   - In the European Championship in January Torvell and Dean beat the Russians.
   - In the Olympics in February the Russians beat Torvell and Dean.

  They were the same people, the only thing that changed was the program and
what they did on the ice.

  If you are correct and this is all predetermined, then the results would
have been the same because they were the same skaters.

  But you are wrong, the same skaters came in with a different order with
respect to each other based on what they did on the ice. Where the Fins
finished has nothing to do with this. 

  If you are right and the order is predetermined, why did the order of
the top skaters change in one month when the only thing that changed was
their program and how they performed on the ice.

  Keep ducking and weaving, see if you can wiggle out of this one.

  George
155.1145HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 19:0312
RE        <<< Note 155.1143 by CTHQ::LEARY "It'sBeenALongTimeComing..." >>>

>    So is Kerrigan still the whiny sore loser or has Bonaly "won" that
>    medal?
    
  Kerrigan is now the millionaire that works for the mouse. Bonaly has taken
over as the whiny sore loser. 

  Although Bonaly did issue an apology which seems to have muted the criticism
somewhat.

  George
155.1146SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dTue Mar 29 1994 19:1110
    
 >    <<< Note 155.1136 by CAMONE::WAY "Valor" >>>
    
 >   Ice Dancing is about as much of a sport as Maypole Dancing.
    
    Dammit Frank, yer messing things up for me.  See, I been inviting
    wimmens over to dance around my pole, and if'n they hear it ain't a
    real sport, that'll be the end of it.
    
    brews
155.1147FRETZ::HEISERShoveling that sunshineTue Mar 29 1994 19:164
    George, did they have the same exact judges both times in your scenario?
    
    Brews, you're crackin me up.  BTW - how's life in your new Ivory Tower? 
    I get to do time their once in a while too now.
155.1148MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 29 1994 19:2710
  >> They were the same people, the only thing that changed was the program and
  >> what they did on the ice.

     Not exactly a minor nit is it, My-eye-ski? By your own estimate T&D skated
     "a program that was loaded with illegal lifts" and yet still manage to
     pull down a medal and make a race of it. And you still can't see a caste 
     system in this non-sport? This baby was in the bag for the Russians from 
     the get-go. The discrepancy from the Euro champs to the Olympics can eas-
     ily be explained by different judging orgs. 
155.1149SOLANA::MAY_BRTFO has been TFSO'dTue Mar 29 1994 19:388
   >  BTW - how's life in your new Ivory Tower?     I get to do time their
   >  once in a while too now.
    
    Much nicer than what we were in, TYVM.  Was thinking of inviting Gin
    over for a May pole dance, but she ain't here anymore.  Well, we are
    closer to May pole dance parlors, anyway.
    
    brews
155.1150HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 19:4621
RE       <<< Note 155.1148 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

  No, you are still ducking the question. The illegal lifts resulted in
deductions that moved them down past the Russians but were not enough to move
them down past anyone else, just as an error in baseball can result in a runner
advancing but might not be enough to win or lose a game. 

  As for the different judges, try again. You said that the event was
predetermined and only a papal decree could result in a change. That suggests
one group making a decision and instructing the judges on how to judge rather
than individual judges deciding based on what they see.

  Make up your mind, is this whole thing staged, prearranged, and predetermined
or is it a contest with a winner picked based on how they perform at the
competition? 

  If it's fixed, how were they able to keep this from the IOC without a single
challenge for the decades that the event has been going on and on what basis
were Torvell and Dean switched with the Russians between the two events?

  George
155.1151the only one left! :^(CSTEAM::FARLEYTue Mar 29 1994 19:4710
    
    
    	Yabbut Brews,
    
    	Since Gin's unavailable, remember Karen?  I hear she does a mean,
    mean maypole dance, especially after the 3rd drink!
    
    I remain,
    Hawk_in_Kev's_Account!
    
155.1152MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 29 1994 19:5410
    
     The analyst for CBS and T&D both said that the judges marked T&D
    harder than anyone else because they were pros. The lifts were just
    the excuse they needed. Tonya Harding had Nancy Kerrigan whacked
    because she felt the judges preferred Nancy over herself and she
    would never be able to beat Nancy because of it. So you see, by
    the admissions of skaters and skating insiders, the standings are
    predetermined with only the slightest adjustments for actual per-
    formance. Sort of like the Westchester Dog Show and about as much
    a sport.
155.1153FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantTue Mar 29 1994 20:025
>    Much nicer than what we were in, TYVM.  Was thinking of inviting Gin
    
    I'm afraid to ask what that means without you getting Jaked(tm).  I was
    there last Friday and was impressed.  All you need now is valet
    parking and a miniature golf course or driving range.
155.1154HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 20:1027
RE       <<< Note 155.1152 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>     The analyst for CBS and T&D both said that the judges marked T&D
>    harder than anyone else because they were pros. 

  So if the order is predetermined and can only be changed by "papal decree",
why did the order between Torvell and Dean and the Russians change between the
European Championship in January and the Olympics in February?

  Was there a papal decree?

  Did the judges decide to flip the positions to make it look good?

  Do they take turns?

  Did the Russians pay off the judges between the European championship and
the Olympics?

  And if they are fixing this event and for all these years all those judges
have been conspiring to predetermine a champion why has no one ever come
forward to report this? How is it possible that the IOC has been keep
completely unaware that this event is fixed? 

  And if the IOC is that bad at uncovering a fix, how do you know that athletes
in other events are not taking bribes to throw other Olympic events?

  George
155.1155MSBCS::BRYDIEI need somebody to shove!Tue Mar 29 1994 20:377
    
      You're wasting your time and CAM's disk space, George. Skaters
     and analysts have already stated that the judges have their minds
     made up before hand. If you want to believe otherwise and that
     professional women's wrestling in Japan is for real, go ahead.
     I've seen the evidence and as an open-minded observer, I know
     the results are pre-determined in both non-sports.
155.1156HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 20:4513
RE       <<< Note 155.1155 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

  Fine, just answer these questions and I'll go away.

  If this is all predetermined and the Judges have made up their minds and
know in advance who is better and who should win, why don't the same skaters
win from event to event? 

  In particular, why did the judges pick Torvell and Dean over the Russians in
January then change their mind and put the Russians ahead of Torvell and Dean
in February? 

  George
155.1157PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 29 1994 20:546
155.1158HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 21:0521
RE             <<< Note 155.1157 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>    They may not win from event to event, but the top 10 finishers don't
>    change significantly, do they.

  That doesn't happen in tennis either, are you saying that tennis is fixed
and not a sport?

  Anyway, the charge made is very serious. He's basically saying that the
judges get together before each event and decide on a fix which varies slightly
from event to event.

  Considering that some of the contests have been so close, the only way that
they could predetermine a winner and still make it look that close would be to
actually decide what score each judge was going to give to each contestant. 

  That's one whopping conspiracy that's been going on for decades. I'm just
wondering how they got away with it for so long? If it's true then the IOC
has really had the wool pulled over their eyes for quite some time.

  George 
155.1159how I see itCSC32::GAULKETue Mar 29 1994 21:2634
    
    
      Tennis is not applicaable in this discussion. Tennis players
    truly play their sport head to head, which is NOT the case
    in ice dancing. Judges in Tennis are used to make out of bounds
    calls and the such. The judges in tennis do not contribute a
    "rating" on the players performance.
    
    
      My interpretation of "fixing" is that the current leaders
    in ice dancing cannot be challenged by anybody new to the sport.
    The champions may finish different in the standings, but it
    always is the same names. This is what MAC alluded to in
    the previous note.
    
       Let me explain, and then you can explain to me.
    
      In an ice dancing competition, the early participants do 
    not collect the marks, or scores, that they are capable of
    receiving. The reasoning is that "we have to save the high
    scores for the later skaters". Is this not correct?
    
      If so, then the order of finishing is pre-determined, i.e. all
    that a veteran has to do is basically show up, and not make too
    many mistakes, and they will be assured of a higher score than
    a skater that went early in the competition and skated flawlesly.
     
      If this is not so, then please explain.
    
      In my opinion, this pre-determines the order of the finishers.
    It may not be the the actual 1-2-3 determination, but it does ensure
    that the 'veterans' names appear in the 1-2-3 finish. 
    
     
155.1160AKOCOA::BREENTill Time Shall be no MoreTue Mar 29 1994 21:346
    I think this was Kerrigan's premise and cause of her ill concealed
    anger.  She felt she had paid her dues, had done the program without
    flaws and it was her turn.
    
    Of course the charades of one Tanya H. had her steaming and perhaps the
    took it out on the Ukrainian ingenue
155.1161HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 21:4343
RE                     <<< Note 155.1159 by CSC32::GAULKE >>>

>      Tennis is not applicaable in this discussion. Tennis players
>    truly play their sport head to head, which is NOT the case
>    in ice dancing. 

  No it does apply. Mac seemed to be suggesting that the fact that the results
were similar is evidence in itself that the event is fixed. I pointed to
tennis as an example of another sport where the results are similar from
event to event but most people feel it is not fixed.

>      In an ice dancing competition, the early participants do 
>    not collect the marks, or scores, that they are capable of
>    receiving. The reasoning is that "we have to save the high
>    scores for the later skaters". Is this not correct?

  Not really. The scores given are relative scores, not absolute scores. If I
were a judge and knew that better skaters were coming I might give someone who
was pretty good a 5.5. Then if someone skated better I might give that person a
5.7. If they skated worse, a 5.3. 

  If it were the last skater and they did a really good job, then I'd give them
the highest mark. It really wouldn't matter all that much if it were a 5.9 or a
6.0 since the ordinal would come out the same in either case. 
    
>      If so, then the order of finishing is pre-determined, i.e. all
>    that a veteran has to do is basically show up, and not make too
>    many mistakes, and they will be assured of a higher score than
>    a skater that went early in the competition and skated flawlesly.

  Not so. If the earlier skater had been given a 5.6 and the older skater came
and did worse they would get a lower score. The "make room" expression means
that they would restrain themselves from giving the earlier skater a 6.0 so
that if the older skater did better they could give them a higher score but it
does not guarantee that the older skater would get that high score if they
didn't skate well. 

  An example is Katerian Witt who skated last in the Olympic long program. They
gave Baiul and Kerrigan scores in the high 5's which "made room" for Witt in
case she skated the performance of her life but she didn't manage it and she
was marked down ending up around 7th place. 
     
  George
155.1162HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Mar 29 1994 21:4815
RE       <<< Note 155.1160 by AKOCOA::BREEN "Till Time Shall be no More" >>>

>    I think this was Kerrigan's premise and cause of her ill concealed
>    anger.  She felt she had paid her dues, had done the program without
>    flaws and it was her turn.
    
  No, Kerrigan said that the reason she was upset with the judging was that
she skated a clean program and Baiul two footed the landing on a couple jumps.
She felt that she had earned the gold medal with her performance.

  In fact, that did win her the technical mark but two footing a landing doesn't
detract as much from the presentation mark which was won by Baiul. Since the
presentation mark was the tie breaker, Baiul won the gold medal.

  George
155.1163My two cents on skating.BSS::MENDEZTue Mar 29 1994 22:1310
    The part that has me bothered George is the presentation marks.
    It was plainly stated during the olympics and other skating events
    that most of the judges prefer the traditional program.  For example
    the more soft orchestra type music as opposed to contemporary music.
    The presentation of one type of music CANNOT be accurately judged
    against another entirely different type of music.  Hence to ME
    presentation scores are at best biased leaning to bogus.
    
    Frank Mendez
    
155.1164CSC32::GAULKETue Mar 29 1994 22:1967
  

 re: tennis

   No, it is not applicable. Tennis is a head to head sport.
  Ice Dancing is not. The reason that tennis is not suspected to
  have a pre-determined order of finish is because, in tennis,
  as well as 99% of other sports, they compete against each other.
  In ice-dancing, the competitors do NOT compete against each other.

>>  Not really. The scores given are relative scores, not absolute scores. If I
>>were a judge and knew that better skaters were coming I might give someone who>
>>was pretty good a 5.5. Then if someone skated better I might give that person a
>>5.7. If they skated worse, a 5.3. 


  So, if an early competitor skates flawlessy, a perfect performance, you
would only give them a 5.5. (to save room). And what do you base
the "better skaters coming along" reasoning? You base it on
previous performances. Why are previous performances involved?
Isn't the CURRENT performance the one that counts? 

  What you're saying here is that you can't apply the scoring evenly
across all competitors, because there are veteran skaters that COULD be
better than the early performers, and you have to "save room". Is this
simply because ties are not allowed?

>> If it were the last skater and they did a really good job, then I'd give them
>> the highest mark. 

    Since the first skater was flawless but only received a 5.6 (or whatever) 
how it is fair that the last skater could receive a higher score for only 
being "really good". Again, this weighs the results in favor of the later
skaters. This is a pre-determined order of finish.
       
>      If so, then the order of finishing is pre-determined, i.e. all
>    that a veteran has to do is basically show up, and not make too
>    many mistakes, and they will be assured of a higher score than
>    a skater that went early in the competition and skated flawlesly.

>>  The "make room" expression means that they would restrain themselves from 
>>giving the earlier skater a 6.0 so
>>that if the older skater did better they could give them a higher score but it
>>does not guarantee that the older skater would get that high score if they
>>didn't skate well. 

   No it does not guarantee a higher score if the veteran skater does not
skate well. But it does guarantee a higher score if the veteran skater
"goes through the motions" and does not, well, does not fall.
    
>  An example is Katerian Witt who skated last in the Olympic long program. They
>gave Baiul and Kerrigan scores in the high 5's which "made room" for Witt in
>case she skated the performance of her life but she didn't manage it and she
>was marked down ending up around 7th place. 

   This is a perfect example of my viewpoint. They had to "leave room". To
me, this means that the performers did not receive the scores they were
capable of receiving, because they had to 'leave room'.

  How is this system fair? 

  As I said earlier, this system weighs the scoring in favor of the later
skaters in the competition. The result? It prevents competitors from being 
judged on their current performance. This is a pre-determined
order of finish.

 
155.1165MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 30 1994 13:027
	If the results weren't pre-determined to an extremely high degree,
	why did the same skaters end up in the same positions in the 4-15
	range for both technical short programs and the long program ?

	Also, as mentioned, the judges were slightly different.  It wouldn't
	surprise me to know that any judges who judged both the European
	championships and the Olympics voted exactly the same way.
155.1167TOOK::HALPINJim HalpinWed Mar 30 1994 13:1521
    
    
>  Considering that some of the contests have been so close, the only way that
>they could predetermine a winner and still make it look that close would be to
>actually decide what score each judge was going to give to each contestant. 

    
    	No George, they wouldn't! All they would have to do is decide
    who they wanted to win. Then each individual judge would just make sure
    that skater received the first ordinal score he/she hands out.
    
    	As you yourself pointed out in a later note, the scores themselves
    are relative, not absolute. This makes it amazing easy for the judges
    to predetermine who wins, without having to assign actual scores ahead
    of time!
    
    	Right???
    
    JimH
    
    
155.1168PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 30 1994 13:236
155.1169PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 30 1994 13:275
155.1170rassling????? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYWed Mar 30 1994 13:301
    
155.1172GENRAL::WADESo, what's on your alleged mind?Wed Mar 30 1994 14:104
    
    	Gymnastics?
    
    Claybone
155.1173HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 14:1517
RE                    <<< Note 155.1165 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

>	If the results weren't pre-determined to an extremely high degree,
>	why did the same skaters end up in the same positions in the 4-15
>	range for both technical short programs and the long program ?

  ... for the same reason that unseeded tennis players almost never beat
the top tennis players. There is a minimum amount of luck involved in both
tennis and skating so the better players almost always beat the lesser
players.

  In golf, there is lots of luck involved "the rub of the green" and the
difference between the top players is not as great so it is far more common
to see different players win each week. It's just the nature of how much
luck is involved in the sport.

  George
155.1174HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 14:3450
RE                     <<< Note 155.1164 by CSC32::GAULKE >>>

>   [Witt] is a perfect example of my viewpoint. They had to "leave room". To
>me, this means that the performers did not receive the scores they were
>capable of receiving, because they had to 'leave room'.
>
>  How is this system fair? 

  It's fair because the only thing that matters is how the skaters are marked
relative to each other. If there are 3 skaters in an event (A, B, and C) and
you believe that C skated best, B next best, and A worst it wouldn't matter if
you marked them 4.8, 4.5, 4.2 respectively, or 5.8, 3.5, 1.2 respectively, they
would come in the same order and receive the same ordinals. 

>Isn't the CURRENT performance the one that counts? 

  Yes but only the ORDER of that performance is important, the absolute score
is not important. I'm not an expert on this but here is the way I've heard that
it works. 

  Regardless if judges are doing Novice 7 year olds from Manchester N.H or a
world class event in Paris the method is the same. Each individual judge
watches the practice sessions and develops a standard to be used to judge that
particular set of skaters during the performance. They decide ahead of time
what type of performance would be perfect, outstanding, very good, average, not
so good, or poor (i.e. 6s, 5s, 4s, 3s, 2s, or 1s). 

  On the night of the performance they watch each skater and grade what they
see during that performance according to that predetermined standard with the
presentation being subjective and the technical portion being more objective. 
It is the standard that is predetermined, not the score of an individual
skater.

  Obviously what would earn a skater a 5.7 at the Novice 7 year old skateoff in
Manchester would not earn a 5.7 in a world class event but that doesn't matter.
The only reason for the marks is to order the skaters so that an ordinal score
can be calculated. 

  So if they know that a better skater is coming along and rate the skaters
(AND THAT FINAL SKATER) from 5.0 to 5.7 instead of 5.3 to 6.0 it doesn't
matter. As long as they put them in the same order they will end up with
the same ordinal values and the results will come out the same.

  Again, the scores are relative scores not absolute scores. It's not a
question of whether a skater deserves a 5.7 or a 6.0 it's a matter of whether
or not they are ahead or behind the other skaters. That's why the entire field
is graded lower to make room for a better skater at the end. If that skater
messes up they will also be graded lower and the order will be maintained. 

  George
155.1175METSNY::francusMets in '94Wed Mar 30 1994 14:4013
Since when has practice counted for anything?? That is like saying that
an umpire watches a pitcher warmup and then decide how to call balls
and strikes that night? Its like an umpire watching batting practice and 
deciding that if the ball can't be swatted out of the park the pitch
will be called a ball.

It means that if one competitor has a worse practice than the other one 
then they need to do less to get a better score.

Try again.

The Crazy Met

155.1176MIMS::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 30 1994 14:4219
>                    <<< Note 155.1173 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>
>
>RE                    <<< Note 155.1165 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>
>
>>	If the results weren't pre-determined to an extremely high degree,
>>	why did the same skaters end up in the same positions in the 4-15
>>	range for both technical short programs and the long program ?
>
>  ... for the same reason that unseeded tennis players almost never beat
>the top tennis players. There is a minimum amount of luck involved in both
>tennis and skating so the better players almost always beat the lesser
>players.


 How can that explain a person falling and still getting EXACTLY the same
 position that they get for both of the other two rounds ?

 Also, do you deny that most commentators state that they believe there is
 a pre-determined mind set by the judges ?
155.1178PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 30 1994 15:153
155.1179PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 30 1994 15:176
155.1180HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 15:3212
RE             <<< Note 155.1175 by METSNY::francus "Mets in '94" >>>

>Since when has practice counted for anything?? That is like saying that
>an umpire watches a pitcher warmup and then decide how to call balls
>and strikes that night? 
>It means that if one competitor has a worse practice than the other one 
>then they need to do less to get a better score.

  Met, you are half reading again. Read the rest of my note where I explain
what you obviously missed.

  George
155.1181HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 15:4234
RE                    <<< Note 155.1176 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

> How can that explain a person falling and still getting EXACTLY the same
> position that they get for both of the other two rounds ?

  For the 1,000,000th time, falling in a major program does not detract all
that much from the score. In the long program it's more what you do rather than
what you fail to do. 

  If you fall doing a mandatory element in an early round, you lose lots of
points. If you fall in a long program you lose almost nothing because there are
no mandatory elements in the final program. 

> Also, do you deny that most commentators state that they believe there is
> a pre-determined mind set by the judges ?

  I have no idea. There are literally tens of thousands of people around the
world skating competitively. As with all sports, we only hear the most
controversal sound bites from the top fraction of a percent of the skaters. 

  If someone like Kerrigan stood in front of the camera 1000 times and said she
felt the judging was fair then one time when she was pissed off blurted out
that it was unfair, the media would play that sound bite to death and most
sports fans would believe that "skaters believe judging is unfair". 

  The fact that thousands of people dedicate their lives to this sport, the top
athletes get interviewed hundreds of times each, and there are only a handful
of negative comments - most often spoken by skaters who have just lost - would
indicate to me that in general skaters are not all that unhappy with the
judging of events.

  Remember, guys like Dan Shaunausy live off people who believe sound bites.

  George
155.1182HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 15:4720
Re       <<< Note 155.1177 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>
                                    -< ex >-

>    The *HUGE* difference, of course, is that in tennis there is real
>    and actual point by point scoring whereas in figure skating it is 
>    up to the whim of the judges. 

  You keep saying this over and over but you can't seem to back it up.

  Your claim that the outcome of skating events is predetermined still makes
no sense. You now say that you don't believe in a conspiracy so tell me how
do the judges manage to make the contests look so close and still predetermine
the winner?

  If there had been one "slip up" by one judge in the Kerrigan/Baiul contest
their "predetermined plan" to give Baiul the gold medal would have been down
the drain. If there is no conspiracy, how do they make predetermined winner
come out on top in the close ones? 

  George 
155.1184PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 30 1994 16:149
155.1185CSC32::GAULKEWed Mar 30 1994 16:3898
>>  ... for the same reason that unseeded tennis players almost never beat
>>the top tennis players. There is a minimum amount of luck involved in both
>>tennis and skating so the better players almost always beat the lesser
>>players.


   Minimum amount of luck involved in skating?  It would seem to me
that ice dancing is judged 30% on skill, and 70% on presentation.
When folks fall, miss jumps, do illegal lifts, and still score higher
than earlier skaters that HAVE SKATED BETTER, that says that presentation 
has a much, much higher weight than skill. 
    Anyway, what is presentation?
    
It's totally subjective criteria. Being such, it's pure luck if the
Czech judge likes or dislikes your costume, or the beat to the music.
There's no skill involved when the criteria is subjective in nature.

>>  On the night of the performance they watch each skater and grade what they
>>see during that performance according to that predetermined standard with the
>>presentation being subjective and the technical portion being more objective. 

    WHAT!?!?! Scores, or standards, are based on what happens in practice?
This is an eye opener. 

    And, the technical portion being "more objective"? Don't you think 
that technical portions should be completely objective? 


>>It is the standard that is predetermined, not the score of an individual
>>skater.

  If you're basing a standard on what goes on in practice, then you are
basing your scoring on what goes on in practice. You are pre-determining
the scoring, before the competition even begins!!


  Let's get to some basic steps... 

  Skaters A, B and C are sheduled to skate in an evening.
  
  Skater A goes first and skates a perfect program. Hits all the jumps, 
DOESN'T FALL. Beeyootifullll!! 
  
  But, since it's the first skater, they only get a 5.5. Have to 'leave room'.

    NOW, STOP! Skater A only received a 5.5. BUT, if she skated later
in the evening, she would score a 6.0, because she's the last skater.
Same performance, opposite ends of the scoring spectrum. This is fair? 
  
  Right off the bat, skater C is spotted half a point.


 Back to skating..

   Skater B splits his pants on a triple lutz, is out of the competition.

   Now we have skater C, who does the program, and falls once, or does
an illegal lift, or whatever. But, because of this standard that was 
based on a practice(!!!) session, skater C could, and 99% of the time does,
scores a higher mark.

   So, because of this practice-based standard, and the 'leave-room'
requirement, skater C wins even though A was better in this performance!!

   And why did skater C receive a higher score? Because the performance
was already weighted in favor of C. As soon as skater A hits the ice,
they know they can do no better than a 5.5, or 5.6.

   Any time you have a competitor that can give an inferior performance
but receive a higher score for that inferior performance, based 
on what they've done in practice and previous performances, you have scoring 
that is pre-determined. 
  

>>  Again, the scores are relative scores not absolute scores. It's not a
>>question of whether a skater deserves a 5.7 or a 6.0 it's a matter of whether
>>or not they are ahead or behind the other skaters. 
>>That's why the entire field
>>is graded lower to make room for a better skater at the end. If that skater
>>messes up they will also be graded lower and the order will be maintained. 
  

  There's that term again. Relative. Relative to practice, relative
to previous performances. This is weighting the scoring, this 
is weighting the standard. And all this happens before the
competition even starts. 

This is pre-determining the order of finish. As has been shown, skater A
has little or no chance to beat skater C, simply because we have
this 'make-room' junk, based on past performances. If we have scores, or 
standards that are based on past performances, we are pre-determining
the order of finish.

  George, for my own information, can you name just ONE other sport 
that scores the current competition with a weight on what has happened 
in practice? I certainly can't think of any.

155.1186SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Mar 30 1994 16:383
BBBBBBBUUUUUUUUUUUUURRRRRRRRRRPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!

Where's that bloody next unseen button?  Ah.
155.1187Skip with n uOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Mar 30 1994 16:451
    Key in n u.That's what I do on all the Winter Olympics notes.
155.1188HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 17:0711
       <<< Note 155.1183 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

  So let me get this straight. Now you are claiming that no judge in the
history of figure skating has ever considered anything that goes on during a
performance? And what, the people who run these events can't see this or are
unable to just once come up with someone who will consider what is going on
during the contest? 

  That's almost as much of a stretch as the giant conspiracy theory.

  George
155.1189It is the scoring that is mal-oderousBSS::MENDEZWed Mar 30 1994 17:148
    George
    
    I thought Steven summed up the competition pretty well.  What is
    your response?  By the way I do think that the competitors are
    great athletes.  It is the scoring that is extremely suspect.
    
    Frank Mendez
    
155.1190FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantWed Mar 30 1994 17:165
>     their finale. While Y number may have sufficient for the Euro's,
>     the Russian pair had added a couple of more X's and T&D never stood 
>     a chance. Simple, no?
    
    Sure is.  The Commie judges outnumbered the West.
155.1191FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantWed Mar 30 1994 17:192
    I think the Warren Commission should judge figure skating in the next
    Olympics.
155.1192HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 17:309
RE                      <<< Note 155.1189 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>

>    I thought Steven summed up the competition pretty well.  What is
>    your response?  By the way I do think that the competitors are
>    great athletes.  It is the scoring that is extremely suspect.
    
  Who's Steven? I didn't see that name. Can you point to a note?

  George
155.1193HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 17:4458
RE                     <<< Note 155.1185 by CSC32::GAULKE >>>

>  If you're basing a standard on what goes on in practice, then you are
>basing your scoring on what goes on in practice. You are pre-determining
>the scoring, before the competition even begins!!

  No, because the important thing in the scoring is the order not the absolute
score. The standard for the group is predetermined but the order in which the
skaters are judged against that standard depends entirely on how they skate
during the performance. 

>    NOW, STOP! [Skater C skates better than Skater A but] Skater A only
>received a 5.5. BUT, if she skated later
>in the evening, she would score a 6.0, because she's the last skater.
>Same performance, opposite ends of the scoring spectrum. This is fair? 

  No, you still don't understand. Say Skater C skates better than skater A.
If skater C goes 1st they might give her a 5.8 to "make room" for skater A
but if skater A doesn't skate as well she will get less than 5.8 like 5.7.

  Had they gone in the opposite order and Skater A had received the 5.7 first
then Skater C did better yes, Skater C might get a 6.0 instead of a 5.8 but so
what? A 6.0 doesn't beat 5.7 any more than 5.8 does. The Ordinals for those
two skaters will still be the same. In either case, Skater C will receive a
better ordinal than Skater A based on the fact that she skated better than
Skater A.

>   Now we have skater C, who does the program, and falls once, or does
>an illegal lift, or whatever. But, because of this standard that was 
>based on a practice(!!!) session, skater C could, and 99% of the time does,
>scores a higher mark.

  No, the standard is only the measure by which they are all judged. If skater
C did worse during the performance than she did during practice her mark would
be lower based on the performance only.

  For example, Brian Batino skated very well during practice and helped to
establish a high standard by which they were all judged but he flubed the short
program and was marked down based on how he did during the performance. 

>  Any time you have a competitor that can give an inferior performance
>but receive a higher score for that inferior performance, based 
>on what they've done in practice and previous performances, you have scoring 
>that is pre-determined. 

  This never happens. Again, the practice is only used to develop the one
standard by which all skaters are judged. It is not used to develop a standard
for each skater. The skaters performance during the competition is measured
against the one standard that they all helped to create during practice and
previous events.

  I suspect that the misunderstanding about this is where a lot of these claims
are coming from saying "skaters say the scores are predetermined". What they
are saying is that the standard by which they are all judged is predetermined
and that their practice sessions helped to create that standard. How they score
depends only on how they skate during the event. 

  George 
155.1194PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 30 1994 17:451
    George, Frank is referring to notes by Mr. (Steven) Gaulke.
155.1195HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 17:478
RE             <<< Note 155.1194 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>    George, Frank is referring to notes by Mr. (Steven) Gaulke.

  Ok Mac, I guess I got the right one.

  Thanks,
  George
155.1196CSC32::GAULKEWed Mar 30 1994 19:0121
    
    I understand perfectly George.
        
    We have a practice. We set a standard.
    
     If I am the first skater in a competition, and I skate above that
     standard, I am guaranteed to
    
    		GET A LOWER SCORE
    
       than if I was a veteran and performed the SAME ROUTINE in the 
    end of the competition.
    
    
     	If I am the first skater in a competition, and perform a perfect
    program, skate above the pre-determined standard, or score, 
    a 'veteran' skater can come in, perform the EXACT SAME
    performance, have a spill, but still score higher than me.
    
    

155.1197I smell a fish in ice skatingBSS::MENDEZWed Mar 30 1994 19:0611
    George,
    If they can determine the order before the final competition and
    if they can determine the standard before the actual competition,
    How can this be determined as a competition.  I always thought
    that practice was for working out kinks in your performance.  Are
    you telling me that perhaps a practice will have a say in your
    score.  And by the way if the order is more important than the score
    than why give scores at all?
    
    Frank
    
155.1198HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 19:088
 ... but do you understand that it doesn't matter what the actual number is
because the skaters will be placed in the proper order regardless of when they
skate? 

  If you skated best and 2nd place who skated later was 5.6, why would you care
that you only got a 5.8 instead of a 6.0? You would still get the #1 ordinal. 

  George 
155.1199HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 19:1420
RE                      <<< Note 155.1197 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>

>    If they can determine the order before the final competition and
>    if they can determine the standard before the actual competition,

  The DON'T determine the finishing order before the competition!!!! The
only "order" that is determined before the competition is the order in which
they skate (i.e. who skates 1st, who skates 2nd, etc.).

  Before the competition they determine the strength of the field by which each
skater will be measured and the order in which they will skate. 

  As they skate, they rate the skaters with numbers like 3.8 and 5.7 to show
how each skater did relative to the average ability of this particular field. 

  When the competition is over, they add up the scores and compare the skaters
scores to each other to determine "ordinals", i.e. the order in which they
finished.

  George
155.1200I don't know what else to say.CSC32::GAULKEWed Mar 30 1994 19:318
    
    
      As the finely honed points of the magnificent bull elks' antlers
    perforated his spleen, lungs, and lower colon, Lenny the Drifter
    wished he had stayed working the street in Times Square, instead
    of going up to the Rockies where this dumb animal had figured
    out that three-card monte was a con, and gored him.
    
155.1202HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 19:4421
  The thing you seem to be hung up on is that you see a problem between a
better skater beating someone 5.8 to 5.6 instead of 6.0 to 5.8 Is that
correct? 

  I'm just curious, do you see that this scoring problem you are talking about
has nothing to do with the order in which they finish? In C, the following
boolean expressions are both TRUE

  (6.0 > 5.8) 
  (5.8 > 5.6) 

what difference does it make which one you use, you get the same result?

  Remember, the marks like 3.8 and 5.7 are not determined on how the skaters
skate against each other, they are determined on how they each skate against
the average strength of the field. 

  It's sort of like golf where a score is based on how you do against the
course, not how you do against the other golfer. 

  George 
155.1203HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Mar 30 1994 19:4923
RE       <<< Note 155.1201 by MSBCS::BRYDIE "I need somebody to shove!" >>>

>     I like that, Steve. And I agree with both you and Frank Mendez
>    on this one. But you'll catch hell getting George to change his
>    mind as I'm sure you've already noticed.

  Yeah, you probably will.

  I still believe that the problem here is that you guys just don't understand
the algorithm. You are assuming it works one way when it really works another.

  If your assumptions were correct I'd agree also but they are not. It just
doesn't work the way you think it does. 

  Biggest mistake you guys are making is that you just don't understand that
the scores are given based on how the skater's performance during the
competition compares to the average strength of the field and that the order is
kept correct regardless of the absolute number given to the skater. 

  Someone tell me, why do you care that someone wins 5.8 to 5.6 instead of 6.0
to 5.8? It's still the same guy wearing the gold medal.

  George 
155.1206Thankful for n uOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Wed Mar 30 1994 19:582
    The way this LDUC is going the number of post olympic notes will
    outnumber the olympic ones... and I don't think I've read any of them!
155.1207PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 30 1994 20:0011
155.1208PTOVAX::JACOBI've got to crack this ice and flyWed Mar 30 1994 20:077
    MAC,
    
    Golf is man .vs. course fer the mosted part, unless yer talking full
    contact golf.  
    
    JaKe
    
155.1209Does anyone recall....AKOCOA::BREENTill Time Shall be no MoreWed Mar 30 1994 20:1919
    Although it wasn't necessarily figure skating does anyone recall the
    event where one of the judges mis-identified one of the premier
    contestants, mixing her up with the pack, and scoring her simply on her
    merits which in this case were low (or possibly were on a par with the
    premier contestants but couldn't be scored that way because the top
    scores were all allotted).
    
    And the Toronto '92 world series star, Sprague is married to the
    American synchronized swimmer who won a gold medal on a judging mishap
    but probably not what I just described.
    
    As I recall, although the judge (above p1) scored the skater as she saw
    it there was an uproar to have the low score modified to reflect a
    "premier" skater.
    
    Incidents like this and the east bloc-west bloc results (not to mention
    that the sports like this are simply boring) have lost me.
    
    btw Is the Miss America pageant a sport?
155.1210PTOVAX::JACOBI've got to crack this ice and flyWed Mar 30 1994 20:2411
    
>>  It's sort of like golf where a score is based on how you do against the
>>course, not how you do against the other golfer. 
    
    Skating ain't nuthin like golf.  In golf yer scoring is absolute, you
    miss the putt, ya adds another stroke to yer score.  In skating, it's
    more a freaking popularity contest wif the judges and how much pee-pee
    smooching ya do.
    
    JaKe
    
155.1211Help I've been sucked in and cant get outBSS::MENDEZWed Mar 30 1994 20:258
    George
    
    The biggest problem I have right now...Is that I have been sucked into
    a LDUC on something that may not even be a sport.  The judging is
    subjective and therefore questionable in MY eyes.
    
    Frank
    
155.1212MSE1::FRANCUSMets in '94Wed Mar 30 1994 20:3211
    Back in the late 80's when Boitano was dominating the US figure skating
    circuit an up and coming competitor was asked the following:
    
    if he skated a perfect routine did he have a chance to beat Boitano if
    Boitano faltered?
    The skater smiled, thought a minute, and said no.
    
    That sums it up.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
155.1213PTOVAX::JACOBI've got to crack this ice and flyWed Mar 30 1994 20:488
    
    >>That sums it up.
    
    We all wish is were that easy, TCM, but there's one in here who will
    insist that it's not twue, it's not twue!!!
    
    JaKe
    
155.1214Name a single great upset in Figure SkatingOURGNG::RIGGENHow to parlay 1K into 100K by Hillary R.Wed Mar 30 1994 21:216
In football    = NY Jets
Baseball       = 69 Mets
Golf           = John Daly
Tennis         = Mike Chang
Figure Skating = There has not been an upset. 

155.1215CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 12:3310
>                -< Name a single great upset in Figure Skating >-

Uh, George when Tommy and I get him cranked?


>Figure Skating = There has not been an upset. 

Gotta be a sport to have an upset.


155.1216HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 31 1994 13:5324
  Back a month or so I made the statement that I have never seen a case where
someone who understood the basic fundamentals of figure skating and understood
the scoring has said it was not a sport. 

  Every single person claiming that it is not a sport can't tell a Lutz from a
toe loop and struggles to understand how ordinals are computed which is the
baseball equivalent of not knowing a single from a fielders choice or
understanding how baserunners get turned into runs. 

  Anyway, if anyone decides to discuss this again, just ask a question or type
something in that indicates you have a legitimate criticism based on some
knowledge of what is actually going on and I'll be happy to discuss it again. 

  By the way, someone said that college basketball was much more popular than
skating. Turns out not in the Boston area. The TV ratings for last week showed
the two B.C. games getting the highest sports ratings but the Figure Skating
ratings were tucked right in after the two Arkansas games and before all the
other games, this despite the fact that no American skaters were in contention
for medals. 

  So yeah if no Americans are in contention and a local school makes the sweet
sixteen sure but with equal local interest the claim is false.

  George
155.1217CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 14:0018
>  Back a month or so I made the statement that I have never seen a case where
>someone who understood the basic fundamentals of figure skating and understood
>the scoring has said it was not a sport. 

Try listening to the FAN.

Back during the Olympic coverage they had someone one (forget his name,
but it wasn't a caller in, it was a guest) who understood skating and
still figured it wasn't a sport.   Competition, perhaps, an art form yes,
physically demanding, yes, but not a sport....

Why, if figure skating is sport, with its judged scoring system, and 
criteria for all those lutzes and toe loops, and things you love so much,
then so is my job, because I get scored the same way....  Just have one
judge called a manager.....


'Saw
155.1218LDUC= ????DELNI::CRITZScott Critz, LKG2/1, Pole V3Thu Mar 31 1994 14:015
    	A brief pause...
    
    	What does the acronym LDUC mean?
    
    	Scott
155.1219just an idea...MKFSA::LONGThat's my story and I'm stickin' to it!Thu Mar 31 1994 14:037
	Hey, I've got a novel idea.  Why doesn't someone start a figure
	skating notes file, WHOCARES::FIGURE_SKATING, then the rest of
	us don't have to wear out out NEXT UNSEEN key and, George, you
	might find someone who shares your interests.  


	billl
155.1223keep on keeping onHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaThu Mar 31 1994 14:3010
George,

Don't take any crap about ratholes, endless and/or pointless discussions,
or heated debates over semi-non-issues. It is the privilege - nay, right
- of ::SPROTSters everywhere to engage in these sort of things.

And whatever you do, don't make the mistake I did which was to accept the
other side of the argument. You won't believe the crap you'll get.

TTom
155.1224HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 31 1994 14:4010
  Ok, will do.

  So Tommy, did you ask either of those little old ladies out? Sounds to me
like a match made in NCAA heaven.

  By the way, skating comes to baseball. The Red Sox have announced that Olympic
silver medalist and the Mouse's best friend Nancy Kerrigan will be throwing out
the 1st ball at Fenway Park.

  George
155.1225now that's just gross!FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 15:231
    
155.1226For George...BSS::MENDEZThu Mar 31 1994 15:4112
    You know George you really got me ticked.  You have the audacity to
    question MY knowledge of figure skating because I do not agree with
    you.  I am kind of proud to not be in your circle of acquaintances
    that agree with you concerning skating.  You have not fully understood
    my beef with figure skating.  I have not stated that figure skating
    was not a sport.  I have questioned its integrity due to the rather
    LARGE amount of subjectivity in its scoring.  If you have a problem
    with that...well I am sorry.  But remember this is SPROTS and you
    my friend need to lighten up.
    
    Frank Mendez
    
155.1227HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 31 1994 17:3411
RE                      <<< Note 155.1226 by BSS::MENDEZ >>>

>    You know George you really got me ticked.  You have the audacity to
>    question MY knowledge of figure skating because I do not agree with
>    you.  ... I have not stated that figure skating
>    was not a sport.  

  Well if you are not one of the ones saying it's not a sport then you are not
one of the ones that I'm talking about so it's not clear why you are ticked.

  George
155.1228PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 17:376
    Well, George, being a sports fan is enough qualification for me to
    discuss whether or not a particular activity is a sport.
    
    BTW, using your requirements of being a figure skating expert, I think
    you should give up the baseball and golf analogies to remain
    consistent.
155.1229CSC32::M_MACGREGORThu Mar 31 1994 17:4632
    
    George,
    
    Be careful who you attack in here.  I think there are some legimit (sp)
    complaints about how the scoring is done.  Nobody disagrees that there
    isn't a subjective part of this scoring, even you have said so.  People
    are disagreeing about whether the scoring is weighted towards the top
    competors, much as the boxing belief that a champion can not lose a
    close fight even if he should.  Whether or not this is true is up for
    debate, but I think it seems to be true, even if it is not done
    intentionally.  I happen to belief in this weighting principle and
    accept it for what it is used/intended.  What you are suggesting is
    that because I believe in this I am not knowledgable about the sport
    (please correct me if I read your response incorrectly)  I can tell the
    difference between the jumps, I know how the scoring works and I
    believe that skating is a sport (n. 1. An active pastime, recreation 
    2. A specific diversion, USUALLY involving physical exercise and having
    a set form and body of rules)  I also suspect that there are many other
    mostly read only noters that feel the same way.
    
    As for everyone involved in this "discussion", it never fails to amaze
    me how when someone says A, the next person says "how dare you say B"  
    It would appear that, in general, the school systems did not teach
    reading comprehension.  Or using great leaps of logic (if a horse has 4
    legs and a table has four legs, then a horse must be a table) to prove
    points to support your arguments.
    
    I think both "sides" have made very good points and have ignored what
    the other has said, I suppose this should not surprise me anymore.
    
    Marc
    
155.1230Enough alreadyOPTION::LAZARUSDavid Lazarus @KYO,323-4353Thu Mar 31 1994 17:524
    .1229 was very well said and should be the final word on this LDUC. 
    To save the readers of this conference time,the CAM disk space and
    network bandwith,I suggest the moderators set this note to nowrite and
    ask that this be taken offline.
155.1231THIS TOPIC HAS BEEN WRITE-LOCKED!FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 17:541
    
155.1232METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 17:567
MikeH,

If you can write-lock this topic that would be a real neat trick.

The Crazy Met

155.1233;-)FRETZ::HEISERanother day in DECrestaurantThu Mar 31 1994 17:581
    Well that trick has worked before in other conferences.
155.1234PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 17:5913
    Sorry, Dave, no can do.  The discussion is sports related.  This
    confernece was set up to discuss sports.  I can't speak for Frank, but
    I won't censor a sports related topic unless it doesn't meet conference
    and company policy.  I think there is a big difference between a
    controversial topic (which this is, judging of events like skating,
    diving, gymnastics, etc. has always evoked controversy) and a rathole.
    
    Having said that I will point out that some of the replies have come
    dangerously close to the line (and may have even crossed the line)
    regarding personal attacks.  In my mind it's OK to attack an opposing
    viewpoint (try to do it intelligently, though) but it's not OK to
    attack the noter holding that viewpoint.  It can be a fine line, but we
    should all be a little more aware that it exists.
155.1236happy trials, to you...CSC32::GAULKEThu Mar 31 1994 18:0313
    
    
    
    
      Well, ahma gettin' on my horse ann ahma goin' home
    
    
    
    
    
      Hey, this here table ain't ah movin'!!
    
    
155.1237PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 18:0413
155.1238CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 18:088
I don't have a problem with the discussion.  Mac hit all the relevant points,
and we're not hurting for disk space on the SPORTS disk on CAM any more,
so it's fine with me.

Besides, I enjoy seeing George get so cranked up about stuff....8^)


'Saw
155.1239CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 18:099
Oh yeah, to me, it's kind of like that scene in "Bull Durham" where Crash
and the umpire get going at it, and Crash calls the ump the one name
that will guarantee him to get tossed (hint:  _C_aesar _S_alad).....

So, like in here, you can say just about anything you want, as long as you
don't use that one word, otherwise you get tossed.....


'Saw
155.1240HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 31 1994 18:1544
RE                   <<< Note 155.1229 by CSC32::M_MACGREGOR >>>

>Nobody disagrees that there
>    isn't a subjective part of this scoring, even you have said so.  People
>    are disagreeing about whether the scoring is weighted towards the top
>    competors, much as the boxing belief that a champion can not lose a
>    close fight even if he should.  

  Well that's not the debate I've been involved it. The claim I've been arguing
against is that skating is fixed and that the judges are in no way influenced
by what they see on the ice.

>Whether or not this is true is up for
>    debate, but I think it seems to be true, even if it is not done
>    intentionally.  

  In the 1993 World Championship Oksana Baiul received the highest marks and
won the gold medal. At the time she was 13 years old and had never skated at
the world level before. If what you say is true, it would have taken her a
few losses to "pay her dues".

  Conversely, a number of pros went back to the Olympics. I pointed out Katerian
Witt who was a pro who skated last and was "left room" at the top but contrary
to what people claimed they did not give her 6.0's. In fact they gave her lower
marks and she came in somewhere around 7th in spite of being a pro who had paid
her dues and skated last. 

>What you are suggesting is
>    that because I believe in this I am not knowledgeable about the sport
>    (please correct me if I read your response incorrectly)  

  No that's wrong. It has been my observation that the people who say skating
is not a sport generally don't understand the basic fundamentals. I never
said there was a casual link, this is purely a correlation. Also I didn't make
this claim about people who talk about the subjectiveness of the scoring,
only about the people I've seen who claim that it is not a sport.

>    I think both "sides" have made very good points and have ignored what
>    the other has said, I suppose this should not surprise me anymore.

  Here we agree. I guess I'm still at the surprise stage. Hopefully I'll get
over it. 

  George
155.1242PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 18:1915
155.1243PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 18:217
155.1245DZIGN::ROBICHAUDFigureSkating,Iditarod,Pro'RasslinThu Mar 31 1994 18:252
    
    
155.1247unfair....unfair....unfair.....CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Mar 31 1994 18:2718
    
    
>>	"..otherwise you get tossed....."
    
    
    		YABBUT HEY!!!!!!!!!!
    
    I thought that was one of the words we're not allowed to use here????
    
    What gives?????  A double standard for the mods???????
    
    
    <insert major grin here>
    
    I remain,
    eagle eyed as usual
    Kev
    
155.1248PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 18:318
    You are doing it again, George.  I didn't say you twisted the balls and
    strikes argument. I said you twisted the argument about the
    predetermination of results.  And based on your last reply, you still
    have it twisted.  Nonone has said that the on the ice performances are
    not looked at by the judges.  What has been said is there are many
    preconceived notions as to proper order of finish along with alot of
    subjectivity which makes many people (skaters, commentators, diehard
    fans, casual fans) question the legitimacy of the judging.
155.1249CSTEAM::FARLEYThu Mar 31 1994 18:369
    
    
    		Yabbut, IMO, MtM just unleashed the babbit-bulldog and it
    got George!
    
    I remain,
    hearing the "ouch" wayyyyyy over here
    Kev
    
155.1250CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 18:458
This is actually getting boring, when you come right down to it.

He bites on EVERY single piece of bait you throw out, and bites hard.

I mean, even fish lay off sometimes........


'Saw
155.1251METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 18:506
yabbut, fish don't get a second chance.

HtH

The Crazy Met

155.1252CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 18:554
>yabbut, fish don't get a second chance.

They always do on those ESPN fishing shows..... 8^)

155.1253lotsHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaThu Mar 31 1994 18:566
Hail, the way I feesh, they get a bunch of chances.

But get me underwater with a spear and they'd better watch out. Of
course, that's a subjective judgement.

TTom
155.1255CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 19:041
@BROKEN_RECORD.COM
155.1257PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 19:0719
155.1259CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 19:2111
>  So how am I different from the guys with whom I am debating with regard
>to this?

Well, first off, you think you're debating.  Most of the guys are just
coming back at you to get you going again.   SPORTS has been that way
for years.

Second, you fall for it every time.  Every single time.  I mean, even
ACC Chris learned not to take the bait every time....

It's pretty simple really......
155.1260first Chris, and then Dean?HBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaThu Mar 31 1994 19:248
>Second, you fall for it every time.  Every single time.  I mean, even
>ACC Chris learned not to take the bait every time....

Hey, this aint fair. You're not allowed to say anything remotely
complimentary to another noter when they're not here to defend
themselves.

TTom
155.1262In the Sin Bin....CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 19:3415
|>Second, you fall for it every time.  Every single time.  I mean, even
|>ACC Chris learned not to take the bait every time....
|
|Hey, this aint fair. You're not allowed to say anything remotely
|complimentary to another noter when they're not here to defend
|themselves.

I know TTom, but after the most excellent tournament loss and his
failure to appear, I couldn't resist.....


I'll take my two minutes for unSPORTSmanlike conduct.....


'Saw
155.1265CAMONE::WAYIt looks good in threes....Thu Mar 31 1994 19:545
>  So how is that different?

Prime example right here.


155.1267PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 20:016
155.1269PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 31 1994 20:112
    Actually George, you seem to be the only one having a problem
    understanding what Tommy is saying.
155.1270METSNY::francusMets in '94Thu Mar 31 1994 20:128
re: .1268

what a riot! lucky I didn't have coffee in my hand when I read it. You
should try doing standup comedy. This is probably the first time
Tommy has ever been accused of not saying what is on his mind.

The Crazy Met

155.1271PTOVAX::JACOBI've got to crack this ice and flyThu Mar 31 1994 20:158
    
>>  So how is that different?
    
    We're laughing our asses off at yer ludicrous statements while you've
    probably got a full blown ulcer over this by now.
    
    JaKe
    
155.1272HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Mar 31 1994 20:2818
RE             <<< Note 155.1269 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>

>    Actually George, you seem to be the only one having a problem
>    understanding what Tommy is saying.

  No, I understand what he's saying. The trick is trying to decipher what he
means when he says it. 

  Am I correct in assuming that when he says that the scores are predetermined
and that it doesn't matter what happens on the ice he really means the judges
are biased and boost up the score of someone they like at the expense of
someone they don't like? 

  If so then there is a difference. In the former case there is no way to beat
a favorite. In the last case you can beat the favorite but it is more
difficult. 

  George 
155.1273MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Mar 31 1994 21:206
>  Am I correct in assuming that when he says that the scores are predetermined
>and that it doesn't matter what happens on the ice he really means the judges
>are biased and boost up the score of someone they like at the expense of
>someone they don't like? 

 That's what it seems like to me, and I'd have to say I agree.
155.1274CSTEAM::FARLEYFri Apr 08 1994 16:2115
    
    
    	Yabbut I know yer all just dying to hear abou this!
    
    I believe it's nexted week that the U.S. Winter Olympic Team gets
    to go to DC, da White House, and a formal dinner.
    
    The USOC specifically *did not* invite Tonya!!!!!  They mumbled
    someting about her presence "being disruptive"......
    
    
    I remain,
    stewing this over  ;^)
    Kev
    
155.1275DZIGN::ROBICHAUDRichardson &gt; DeanFri Apr 08 1994 16:263
    	Will Nancy Kerrigan be attending or is this too corny for her?
    
    				  /Don
155.1276fixedHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaFri Apr 08 1994 16:573
Will the reporters have already made up their minds about this? 

TTom
155.1277HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Apr 08 1994 17:174
  I think it's all predetermined by the White House press core.

  George
155.1278CSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Fri Apr 08 1994 17:585
>>          <<< Note 155.1275 by DZIGN::ROBICHAUD "Richardson > Dean" >>>
>>
>>    	Will Nancy Kerrigan be attending or is this too corny for her?
    
Besides, when you've seen one Mickey Mouse outfit, you've seen 'em all.
155.1279One good lawsuit deserves another.AIMHI::KERRCaught In The CrossfireFri Apr 08 1994 18:365
    
    And, of course, Tonya and her lawyers will be filling a lawsuit
    to overturn the USOC's decision.
    
    
155.1280conspiracyHBAHBA::HAASThe karma ran over my dogmaFri Apr 08 1994 18:401
Somehow, I get the feeling that Whitewater's involved in all this...
155.1281CAPNET::LEFEBVREPCBU Product ManagementMon Apr 11 1994 03:1910
                    <<< Note 155.1277 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>


>  I think it's all predetermined by the White House press core.
>
>  George
    
    The White House press core what?
    
    Mark.
155.1282CAMONE::WAYThe Old Man and the PCMon Apr 11 1994 12:143
>    The White House press core what?
    
Apples?
155.1283The Nancy and Tonya storyCSC32::J_HENSONWho elected Hillary?Mon Apr 11 1994 14:346
And did you see that there's already a TV movie being advertised?  I think
it's NBC that's doing it, but wouldn't swear to it.  It's supposed to
air next month (I think).  I know that Oregon has a Son of Sam law,
but I'll bet that Tonya's getting some sort of cut on this.

Jerry
155.1284HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Apr 11 1994 14:5520
RE         <<< Note 155.1283 by CSC32::J_HENSON "Who elected Hillary?" >>>
>                         -< The Nancy and Tonya story >-

>I know that Oregon has a Son of Sam law,
>but I'll bet that Tonya's getting some sort of cut on this.

  Even if they do have a Son of Sam Law she should still be able to sell her
story. The crime she plead to was some sort of obstruction of justice charge
for lying to the FBI during the investigation. That happened during a 3 day
period between the time she returned from Nationals after the attack and the
time she admitted not telling the truth. 

  She has not been convicted of any crime covering the period leading up to the
nationals, which includes the attack, or the time after she admitted lying
which includes the Olympics. 

  So as I understand Son of Sam laws, all she would be prohibited from making
money on would be the part of her story covering those three days.

  George
155.1285METSNY::francusMets in '94Mon Apr 11 1994 15:196
Well the Oregon las is under challenge and even the Attorney General of
Oregon expects the law to be ruled unconstitutional so it really
doesn't matter much.

The Crazy Met

155.1286HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Thu May 05 1994 20:1141
    Subject: Punk Band Invites Harding to Join
    Copyright: 1994 by Reuters, R
    Message-ID: <XRcanada-hardingUR705_4y4@clarinet.com>
    Date: Wed, 4 May 94 18:40:02 PDT
    Expires: Wed, 11 May 94 18:40:02 PDT
    ACategory: international
    Slugword: CANADA-HARDING
    Priority: regular
    ANPA: Wc: 256/0; Id: a2268; Src: reut; Sel: reute; Adate: 05-04-N/A
    Lines: 29
    
    	 VANCOUVER (Reuter) - Disgraced American figure skater Tonya
    Harding got a shot at a new career as a singer Wednesday when
    she was invited to join a punk rock band.
    	 The White Trash Debutantes, which includes a 78-year-old
    grandmother and three male cross dressers, said it was 
    negoatiating with Harding's lawyers on the offer.
    	 ``We promised her that we were serious (and) that there was
    no mockery being made of her,'' lead singer Ginger Coyote said
    in a statement released by the group's publicity agency.
    	 ``She is now looking at her career options and the White
    Trash Debutantes is one of them.''
    	 The fringe band said it has already written a song for the
    skater titled ``Don't Mess with Tonya Harding.''
    	 Lawyers for Harding were not available to comment on the
    offer. Harding was forced to end her skating career after she
    pleaded guilty in March to covering up the plot to attack rival
    Nancy Kerrigan.
    	 Harding is reportedly planning to appear this month on a
    television talk show and in March received a $2 million Japanese
    offer to become a professional wrestler.
    	 The San Francisco-based Debutantes announced the Harding
    offer in Vancouver where they will be performing May 14 as part
    of an alternative music festival.
    	 The group said they hoped Harding could join them for the
    concert.
    	 Harding was sentenced to three years' probation and legal
    sources said it was unlikely she would be allowed to travel to
    Canada. Canadian law denies entry to people who have been
    convicted of crimes.
    
155.1287good, in a wayHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 05 1994 20:3611
>    	 The White Trash Debutantes, which includes a 78-year-old
    grandmother and three male cross dressers, said it was 
    negoatiating with Harding's lawyers on the offer.

I caught these, uh, people the other night on Talk Soup. They coulda been
in the movie Liquid Sky.

This description really doesn't do them justice. The music sucks but they
have a hail of a presentation and stage presence.

TTom
155.1288HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Thu May 05 1994 20:552
    I miss Talk Soup... sigh..
    
155.1289it's still onHBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 05 1994 20:590
155.1290HANNAH::ASHEHome of the driveby noter...Thu May 05 1994 21:003
    I lost it when I moved from Burlington to Natick... don't get E!
    any more...
    
155.1291culture is such a_illusive thang...HBAHBA::HAASMaybe too much Goody's PowderThu May 05 1994 21:010
155.1292too funnyFRETZ::HEISERno D in PhoenixMon May 09 1994 18:071
    So how do you think Tonya will fare as a punk rocker?
155.1293HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 18:2864
<<< Note 204.26 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

  If you don't mind, this probably belongs here rather than cluttering up the
year end note.

>    	What has the IOC done, with regards to "sports", other than
>    organize the games every 4 years??? Most of the IOC's history 
>    generates anything but respect from me. Especially the discriminatory
>    rules arround "amateurism" and "professionalism". 

  Actually I believe that it is the national Olympic committees or it's the
committee for each sport that make the rules on pros and amatures. As far as I
know there has never been a standard rule on this across nations or sports from
the IOC. 

  For example, in basketball pros can play. In other events, only amatures can
play. Back in the Iron Curtain days in the old eastern block nations,
professionals played. In Western states only amatures could play. 

>    	The rules do a great job of weeding out the poorer performers, but
>    when it comes down to selecting a "winner", it is basically a matter of
>    opinion on the part of the judges (most of the time...).

  More subjective yes, but no sport is truly objective. Runner on 2nd, a shot
into left field. Here comes the runner, here comes the throw. The ball bounces,
the runners slides.

  Is the runner safe if he beats the throw or is he safe if in the opinion of
the umpire he beats the throw? Is baseball a sport? 

>    	In other words George, anybody who doesn't agree with you is
>    ignorant. Correct???? An interesting debating style, but irrelevant to
>    the discussion......

  No, I'm not saying that at all. All I'm asking is if there is anyone who
both understands the basic fundamentals of skating who also believes it is
not a sport.

  Last time we had this debate I asked if there was anyone who could tell the
difference between a Lutz and a tow loop without looking it up who felt that
figure skating was not a sport. I got no takers. That's about as basic as you
can get.

  Imagine of someone who couldn't tell you the difference between a lateral and
a forward pass told you that football was not a sport. It would be the same
as hearing someone who couldn't tell a sit spin from a flying camel telling
you that figure skating was not a sport. 

>    	Explain to me why the judging results so often has followed along
>    the lines of the politcal orientation of the judge's home countries,
>    i.e. Eastern Blocks judges vs Western judges.

  Actually they are not. If you'll notice the judges are usually within a few
points. If it truly were not a sport you'd see someone like Kerrigan getting
5.7's from the west and 3.5's from the east. Instead what you normally see is
skaters getting all scores within about a 0.4 range. 

>    	I like this one. Explain to me why the IOC, whom you so greatly
>    respect, consider the Equestrian Events an Olympic "sport"????

  You'll notice that it's the riders, not the horses, who get up on the podium
during the medal ceremony. 

  George
155.1294TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 19:1566
    
    
    
>  Actually I believe that it is the national Olympic committees or it's the
>committee for each sport that make the rules on pros and amatures. As far as I
>know there has never been a standard rule on this across nations or sports from
>the IOC. 
    
    	That is indeed the current situation George. But not the way it was
    oringinally, nor indeed until 1980 or so...
    
    	The IOC insisted on amatuer atheletes.
    
    	Again, I'll ask the question. What has the IOC done to deserve any
    respect? It is only relevant, because you use that as part of your
    justification of F.S. as a "sport".
    
>  More subjective yes, but no sport is truly objective. Runner on 2nd, a shot
>into left field. Here comes the runner, here comes the throw. The ball bounces,
>the runners slides.
>
>  Is the runner safe if he beats the throw or is he safe if in the opinion of
>the umpire he beats the throw? Is baseball a sport? 
    
    	Yup, I fully agree there isn't 100% objectivity in any competition.
    I guess I see a major difference between an umpire deciding if the ball
    od the baserunner got to the bag first, versus an umpire deciding on a
    baserunner's "artistic" merits in executing a hookslide. The ump may
    (and do) make mistakes in their decisions. But nothing comes down to
    how any umpires "feels" about how the baserunner performed.
    
    
>  Last time we had this debate I asked if there was anyone who could tell the
>difference between a Lutz and a tow loop without looking it up who felt that
>figure skating was not a sport. I got no takers. That's about as basic as you
>can get.
    
    I'll concede that I cannot sit here in my office an describe the
    differences between these two moves (BTW, is it a "tow loop" or a
    "toe loop"?).
    
    But my objections to Figure Skating has nothing to do with it as an
    athletic endeavour, or my personal ability to describe the technical
    aspects of any particular figure skating maneuver. It has to do with
    how a winner in a competition is determined.
    
    The bottom line is: At the end of any particular Figure Skating
    competition do I always feel like the person on performed best on the
    ice that particular day won? The answer all to often is no.
    
    Do I think Figure Skaters are athletes? Yes definitely. Both in their
    physical conditioning and the level of skill it takes to perform at
    the world class level.
    
    Do I enjoy watching Figure Skating? Yes... Even on my summer vaction
    in the Adirondacks, we spent a day at the Olympic Skating Venues
    watching the practice sessions and went to the weekly the Saturday Night
    performance.
    
    Do I consider it a sport? No! 
    
    JimH
    
    
    
    
155.1295HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 19:3819
RE                     <<< Note 204.27 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>

>I've never been able to recognize figure skating as a sport... if you lined
>up a panel of judges at the ballet, you'd have the same thing.  Both take a
>great deal of athleticism, but there just isn't any intrinsic competition --
>it's all contrived.  

  If it were as subjective or "contrived" as people say, why did all of the
favorites, Viktor Petrenko, Brian Boitano, Kurt Browning and Katterina Witt,
whom the judges had all rewarded with medals previously, get shut out of the
medals in last winter's Olympics? 

  People who believe in figure skating as a sport point to the mandatory
deductions due to required elements that they failed or left out of their short
program and/or lack of content in their long program. What theory do those
who do not believe in figure skating as a sport advance as the reason those
previous stars got shut out in Lillihamer?

  George
155.1296METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Jan 03 1995 19:419
nit: Witt was not considered a favorite for a medal.

Notice also that all the atheletes you mentioned had turned pro and then
come back with amateur status (whatever the heck that is!). I would not at
all be surprised if the judges were biased against those who came back
after turning pro.

The Crazy Met
155.1297TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 19:5937
    
    
    > If it were as subjective or "contrived" as people say
    
    	I have yet to see anybody use the word "contrived" up until
    your note. Subjective != contrived
    
    
> People who believe in figure skating as a sport point to the mandatory
>deductions due to required elements that they failed or left out of their short
>program and/or lack of content in their long program. What theory do those
>who do not believe in figure skating as a sport advance as the reason those
>previous stars got shut out in Lillihamer?
    
    
    	I don't recall any of the skaters you mentioned as being considered
    favorites going into the 94 Olympics. And as somebody pointed out,
    there were many hints floating about the judges being biased against
    professional skaters. I remember Torvill and Deane being especially
    disappointed in how their performance was scored by the judges. (And
    there was the controversey about their over the back flip, that was
    ruled a lift)
    
    	And as I pointed out (or tried to) in an earlier note, the Figure
    Skating scoring systems does a good job of eliminating skaters who have
    poor performances. As you point out there are mandatory deductions for
    failing to hit elements. Where the system falls completely apart is
    when two skaters both turn in excellent technical performances. The
    winner is such a case is often based on artistic merits.
    
    	Figure Skateing is as much a "sport" as the Miss America pagent.
    
    JimH
    
    
    
    
155.1298HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 20:0063
<<< Note 155.1294 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	The IOC insisted on amatuer atheletes.

  As I recall there was a guy who was the head of the U.S. National Olympic
committee named something like Avery Brundage who was the one most responsible
of the United States being limited to amatures up until the 1980 time frame. 

  He and others like him believed very strongly (rightly or not) in amatuer
sports and fought against any attempt to have pros qualified for the U.S.
Olympic team. And since the U.S. amatures did fairly well, no one seemed to
mind. 

  Then in the 80's, Brundage left and the Russian pros started beating the U.S.
college kids at basketball and things started to change. 

  In any case, the IOC may have frowned on pros from the west but they never
had to disallow our pros because we never sent them. 

>    	Again, I'll ask the question. What has the IOC done to deserve any
>    respect? It is only relevant, because you use that as part of your
>    justification of F.S. as a "sport".

  The Olympics is the greatest sporting event in the world. Every time it's
on, winter or summer, I stayed glued to my seat for the entire 2 weeks. Now
that may be happening in spite of the organization responsible for running
the Olympics but I doubt it. Their results earn them my respect.

>The ump may
>    (and do) make mistakes in their decisions. But nothing comes down to
>    how any umpires "feels" about how the baserunner performed.

  Yes it's subjective but that doesn't mean that it's contrived or without
any guidelines or form. The skaters all know what the judges are looking
for and they all add those elements into their programs and practice them
to death.

  If it were as non-structred as you claim, no one would have any idea what
to do in their program.

  By the way, during one of the NFL games this weekend, I forget which one, the
announcers were saying that one of the coaches went over all of the referees 
during a player meeting to make his team aware of the idiosyncrasies of each
ref and what they would likely be looking for during the game.

  Now if football is so objective, why would he waste his time with an exercise
of that sort?

>    I'll concede that I cannot sit here in my office an describe the
>    differences between these two moves (BTW, is it a "tow loop" or a
>    "toe loop"?).
    
  Fine, you win the spell'en bee. But if you don't understand the basic
fundamentals, then how do you know that the contestants don't understand the
basic structure of what is to be presented and what the judges are looking for?

  And as I'm sure you know, presentation is only half the mark. In the 
technical part of the score they are actually counting things like jumps,
spins, and foot work. The reason Brian Boitano didn't win a metal during
the last Olympics was because he missed a mandatory triple axel during the
short program, not because some judge felt like giving him a bad score.

  George
155.1299METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleTue Jan 03 1995 20:084
Actually I believe that Boitano was considered a favorite for a medal,
but not to the same degree as in 1992.

The Crazy Met
155.1300HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 20:1123
                     <<< Note 204.29 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>

>I mean, there rarely is a dispute in basketball whether or not the ball went
>through the hoop, but in skating when one judge gives a 8.2 and another a 9.4
>it really makes me wonder what the hail I'm watching.

  Well if you are seeing scores like 8.2 and 9.4 I wonder what you are watching
as well since they use a system that goes from 0.0 to 6.0.

  Once again if someone came up to you and said football is not a sport
because they give the team 9 points for a touchdown would you figure the guy
knew what he was talking about? Everyone who claims figure skating is not a
sport has the same lack of knowledge to even the simplest and most basic
fundamentals of the event. 

  You can't possibly know how those scores are calculated if you don't know
the fundamentals of the sport. The athletes do know where those numbers come
from and they spend 6 hours a day practicing their butts off so that they
can do the things that earn them those points.

  If it were without structure, why would they spend all that time practicing?

  George
155.1301HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 20:1411
RE     <<< Note 155.1296 by METSNY::francus "There is no joy in Mudville" >>>

>Notice also that all the atheletes you mentioned had turned pro and then
>come back with amateur status (whatever the heck that is!). I would not at
>all be surprised if the judges were biased against those who came back
>after turning pro.

  Viktor Petrenko did not turn pro between winning the Olympic gold medal
in 1992 and getting beat in the Olympics in 1994.

  George
155.1302HELIX::MAIEWSKITue Jan 03 1995 20:2239
RE<<< Note 155.1297 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    > If it were as subjective or "contrived" as people say
>    
>    	I have yet to see anybody use the word "contrived" up until
>    your note. Subjective != contrived

  See 204.27 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG    
    
>    	I don't recall any of the skaters you mentioned as being considered
>    favorites going into the 94 Olympics. And as somebody pointed out,
>    there were many hints floating about the judges being biased against
>    professional skaters. 

  Viktor Petrenko was a favorite who had not turned pro.

  But in any case, anyone who watched the events could clearly see the mistakes
that the others made during the short program that lead to their mandatory
deductions. Unless, of course, you don't understand what you are watching.

  Think about what you guy are saying.

    - The short program in the men's program has a triple axel as a required
      element.

    - Each required element missed results in a 0.5 mandatory deduction.

    - Brian Boitano missed the triple axel in his short program and landed
      on his butt.

    - Brian Boitano's score from all the judges was about 0.5 below what
      was expected

    THEREFOR

      Brian Boitano was given a low score because he was a pro that returned
    to the Olympics.

  George
155.1303TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Tue Jan 03 1995 20:3990
    
    
    
>  As I recall there was a guy who was the head of the U.S. National Olympic
>committee named something like Avery Brundage who was the one most responsible
>of the United States being limited to amatures up until the 1980 time frame. 
    
    Avery Brundage was the Head (president, whatever) of the IOC!!!!!!
    And yes you are correct, he is the person mostly responsible to
    clutching fiercely to the amatuer only rules for so long....
    
    
>  The Olympics is the greatest sporting event in the world. Every time it's
>on, winter or summer, I stayed glued to my seat for the entire 2 weeks. Now
>that may be happening in spite of the organization responsible for running
>the Olympics but I doubt it. Their results earn them my respect.
    
    
    	So that makes them great at Large Event logistics, Marketing, and
    T.V. contract negotiating. It doesn't make them experts are deciding
    what is or isn't a sport.
    
    
>  Yes it's subjective but that doesn't mean that it's contrived or without
>any guidelines or form. The skaters all know what the judges are looking
>for and they all add those elements into their programs and practice them
>to death.
    
    	Again, I NEVER said I thought the judging results were 'contrived',
    just subjective. Yes there is structure and there are guidelines. And
    it is very clear what the judges are looking for in terms of technical
    elements, and what will be deducted for mistakes and omissions.
    
>  If it were as non-structred as you claim, no one would have any idea what
>to do in their program.
    
    	Where did I say it was 'unstructured'? I seem to be completely
    missing my point.
    
    
    I've already concede that no sport is 100% objective. A football
    referee has to make 'judgement' calls, just like the baseball ump. But
    the tend to be of the 'was his foot inbounds?' type call. Not "He only
    gets 5.8 points for that TD, because he wasn't graceful as he crossed the
    goal line" type of 'judgement'. BTW, I think the NFL blew it big time
    with its handling of instant replay. Rather than fixing the problems
    with the system, they tooka major step backwards, and got rid of it.
    
    
    	Football players rarely (note: not never...) walk off the field and 
    blame their loss on an official. Even if there was a controversial
    decsion late in a game, typically the reaction is we never should have
    been a position to have a bad call effect the game.
    
    	But at the end of Figure Skating (or Boxing, Gymnastics, or any
    other judged competition) competitions there are frequently questions the final
    scores by the participants and their coaches.
    
    	Take the Baiul/Kerrigan fiasco. No matter who had won the Gold in
    that competition, there was going to be questions about why one was
    better than the other. Several judges had the two skaters tied overall,
    but Baiul got the higher ordinal from those judges (or from more of
    them) based on higher artistic marks. 
    
    	I understand those are the rules of the competition. The Skaters
    have to live with it, and that's fine. But in my mind, it is that
    completely subjectivedecsion making process, where skater A and skater
    B have turned in essentially equal technical performances, but skater B
    wins because she 'pleased' me more, that separates judged competitions
    from 'true' sports.
    
    JimH
    
    
>>(BTW, is it a "tow loop" or a "toe loop"?).
    
>Fine, you win the spell'en bee
    
    	Oops, sorry George, that wasn't meant to be a jab at you. I really
    didn't know....
    
    
    
    
    
    	
    
    
    
    
155.1304FXTROT::ALLEMANGTue Jan 03 1995 20:4221
>  Well if you are seeing scores like 8.2 and 9.4 I wonder what you are watching
>as well since they use a system that goes from 0.0 to 6.0.

Ok, my example was bad for skating, maybe good for gymnastics?  It doesn't 
matter.  My point is, how can a number of supposed expert judges come up with
large variations in scoring if it isn't subjective to some degree?  And, yes,
a basketball official makes subjective decisions too, but they are a small 
piece of the game, not the *whole* thing.  Thousands play basketball every day
with no officials!  Is it possible for 2 figure skaters to do the same?  I don't
know.  You are right -- I don't know much about the fundamentals of figure
skating.  Yet, I know even less about cricket and jai alai, but somehow know
that they are sports.

Re: Contrived.   That was the word I used to describe the competition, NOT
the scoring.  Figure skating appears (to me) to be an art form that was
contrived to be a competition.  Anything can be made into a competition, but 
a sport has competition as its heart and soul.  Why do figure skaters wear
make-up and pretty clothes?  What does that have to do with sport?

Greg
155.1305HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 12:4234
<<< Note 155.1303 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    Avery Brundage was the Head (president, whatever) of the IOC!!!!!!

  Well at one time he was a U.S. official but the point still remains, it
was officials from the U.S. that pushed the amateur status, no one forced it
on us and now it seems to be getting phased out.

>    	Again, I NEVER said I thought the judging results were 'contrived',
>    just subjective. 

  So why does that alone mean that figure skating is not a sport?

  Sports to me involves a lot more than the final score. It involves planning,
preparation, training, communication between player and coach, there is a
physical aspect, a mental aspect, and there is the competition itself as
athletes go out and try to put forth their best. 

  Officiating involves more than the final score as well it involves conducting
the event in an orderly fashion, keeping conditions fair for the competitors,
calling fouls, and seeing that the score is recorded in a fair and impartial
manor. And yes sports involves the method in which the score is calculated
which in figure skating involves both a subjective and an objective component
and the determination as to who won. 

  When you look at that list the only difference between figure skating and any
other sport is that one part of the calculation of the score is subjective
according to methods that are well understood by the coaches, competitors and
judges. And because of that alone figure skating is not a sport? 

  Well maybe not to you but it is to me and so far it is to everyone else with
whom I've spoken who understands the basic fundamentals of the sport. 

  George
155.1306HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 12:5526
RE                    <<< Note 155.1304 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>

>Ok, my example was bad for skating, maybe good for gymnastics?  It doesn't 
>matter.  My point is, how can a number of supposed expert judges come up with
>large variations in scoring if it isn't subjective to some degree?  

  No one is saying that the score is not subjective but the the point is that
they don't have large variations. The scores are almost always within a rather
small range for any given competitor. 

  In a typical competition scores for figure skaters will vary from the 2.8
range to up around 5.9 but if you'll notice the individual judges that score
any one competitor are almost always within a 0.5 range of each other and most
scores are usually within a 0.2 to 0.3 range of each other. That's hardly a
large variation when the difference between the top and bottom skaters can be
as much as 3.0 and sometimes more. 

>Thousands play basketball every day
>with no officials!  Is it possible for 2 figure skaters to do the same?  

  Millions of people skate for sport every day without a judge in sight. As I
said in my previous note, there is lot more to a sport than just figuring out
who won and who lost. At that level it's more the exercise and fun of playing
the game that counts.

  George
155.1307HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 13:0520
RE                     <<< Note 204.33 by MIMS::ROLLINS_R >>>

  Pardon me for moving your note but it probably belongs here.

>   That has almost never been the case.  Wasn't this the first Olympics
>   (as well as the last) that professionals had been allowed to regain amateur
>   status to skate in the Olympics ?  Where was the world's best female
>   figure skater ?  Not at the Olympics, I can assure you.

  Even so, with Olympic figure skating the top 6 competitors in the final round
are probably 6 of the top 12 athletes in the sport in terms of capability and
probably the top 6 in terms of preparation. Pro figure skaters tend to let
themselves go. 

  By contrast, if you take the final game of the final four you are hardly
talking about 2 of the best 4 teams in basketball. There are probably 25+ teams
in the NBA that could blow the NCAA champion away by a good 20 points every
time they played. 

  George
155.1308FXTROT::ALLEMANGWed Jan 04 1995 13:1023
>  Millions of people skate for sport every day without a judge in sight. 

I would say:  'Millions of people skate for fun and recreation every day...'
					    ___________________

>As I
>said in my previous note, there is lot more to a sport than just figuring out
>who won and who lost. At that level it's more the exercise and fun of playing
>the game that counts.
     ^^^^

I would argue that 'the game' at least implies, if not requires, competition.
The 'competition' of figure skating is comparing two artists outstanding
athletic abilities and ability to perform under pressure.  But 'skating' is not
inherently a game, it is contrived to be a game for the sake of drawing
audiences at the Olympics and other events.

I'm done. ;) 

All in fun,

Greg
155.1309HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 13:2820
RE                    <<< Note 155.1308 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>

>But 'skating' is not
>inherently a game, it is contrived to be a game for the sake of drawing
>audiences at the Olympics and other events.

  There are thousands of people in the united states and 10's of thousands
around the world who skate in competitions throughout the year. With the
exception of the top 10-20 skaters, these competitions have nothing to do with
drawing in audiences, they are skating simply to try to do the best that they
can at at a sport they like. 

  Yes some of those skaters have the slim chance of making the top as a goal
but the majority just skate for the sport, even in competition. 

  And no one would ever accuse those individuals who dedicate themselves to
competitive roller skating of doing it for the sake of drawing audiences
because they don't.

  George
155.1310TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Wed Jan 04 1995 14:2747
    
    
    
>>    Avery Brundage was the Head (president, whatever) of the IOC!!!!!!
>
>  Well at one time he was a U.S. official but the point still remains, it
>was officials from the U.S. that pushed the amateur status, no one forced it
>on us and now it seems to be getting phased out.
    
    Not true. It was the IOC that forced the only amatuer rule for years
    at the Olympic games. It has only been since the about 1980 that the 
    IOC has left the decsion to the individual sports' ruling bodies
    
>  When you look at that list the only difference between figure skating and any
>other sport is that one part of the calculation of the score is subjective
>according to methods that are well understood by the coaches, competitors and
>judges. And because of that alone figure skating is not a sport? 
    
    Yes, that is exactly my point of view. The same goes for Gymnastics,
    High Diving, Rythmic Dancing, Synchronized Swimming....
    
    
>  Well maybe not to you but it is to me and so far it is to everyone else with
>whom I've spoken who understands the basic fundamentals of the sport. 
    
    
    	This isn't true not matter how many times you repeat. I understand
    the basic fundamentals of the sport, despite the fact I can't describe
    what a 'Lutz' is right now. When watching a Figure Skating performance,
    which I have been doing for years, I can tell when a particular move
    has been done well or not.
    
    	We've talked a lot about the technical aspects of Figure Skating:
    required elements, mandatory deductions, etc...
    
    	You seem to be completely avoiding the issue of the completely
    subjective category of "Artistic Impression", which in many
    competitions separates the medal winners.
    
    	Do you care to comment on that George? Or will you just keep on 
    repeating the "...everybody who understands the fundamentals of the
    sport (sic) agrees with me" chant???
    
    JimH
    
    
    
155.1311HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 15:5933
RE<<< Note 155.1310 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	You seem to be completely avoiding the issue of the completely
>    subjective category of "Artistic Impression", which in many
>    competitions separates the medal winners.
    
  I haven't avoided it at all.

  Artistic Impression is a subjective evaluation made by the judges. It is made
according to subjective standards that all the coaches and skaters understand,
plan for, practice, and work hard to execute.

  It includes such things as depth of edges, body position, synchronization
of moves to music and other things that are not all that difficult to
understand.

  Look, it's this simple. Assuming that I am graphing the top and bottom half
of a skater, which one of these skaters is holding better form?

       \         |
    A   \     B  \

  Assuming a skater is going around a corner, which one has the deeper edge?

       \         |
    A   \     B  |

  My subjective evaluation is that A has better form and a deeper edge so A
gets a better score for artistic impression.

  To a judge who is skilled at evaluating skaters it's about that simple.

  George
155.1312MKFSA::LONGSteelers...strivin' fer 5!Wed Jan 04 1995 16:151
    Thank goodness for the NEXT UNSEEN key!
155.1313TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Wed Jan 04 1995 16:2437
    
    
    
>  Artistic Impression is a subjective evaluation made by the judges. It is made
>according to subjective standards ...
    
    "subjective standard"????
    
    From my dictionary...
    
    	subjective - preceeding from or taking place within an individual's
                     mind.
    
    	standard - An acknowledged measure of comparison for quantitative
                   or qualitive value; criterion; norm;
    
    In other words, each individual judges decides in his/her mind what the
    standard is for excellence in "artistic impression".
    
    
    
> ....that all the coaches and skaters understand,
> plan for, practice, and work hard to execute.
    
    	So you are saying that all the coaches and skaters are mind
    readers!!!! Because that's the only way they know how to please the
    judges when it comes to scoring the artistic marks.
    
    	And you claim everybody knows exactly what they have to do a head
    of time in order to win the competetion? Baloney, all they know is what
    they can't do, technically, in order not be eliminated via mandatory
    deductions. When it comes down to "who wins", it is often a matter of
    opinion on the part of the judges.
    
    JimH
    
    
155.1314HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 16:3225
RE<<< Note 155.1313 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	So you are saying that all the coaches and skaters are mind
>    readers!!!! Because that's the only way they know how to please the
>    judges when it comes to scoring the artistic marks.

  No I didn't say that at all. I said that artistic impression is based on
things like deep edges, body form, synchronization of moves to music, etc.
There's no mind reading involved. You either land your jump on rhythm or
you do not. You either keep your leg straight or you bend it.

  It is a subjective evaluation of how you do those things but that does
not mean it is based on mind reading. 
    
RE Subjective evaluations

  Ever take essay tests that were marked subjectively? 

  Would you say those were not real tests because they were subjective? 

  Do you feel that it is not real education when one kids gets an 87 and
another gets a 92 for their response to a question on the motives that lead the
Pilgrims to immigrate to the new world? 

  George
155.1315TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Wed Jan 04 1995 16:3613
    
    
  >Ever take essay tests that were marked subjectively? 
  >
  >Would you say those were not real tests because they were subjective? 
    
    
    	No, I just wouldn't try to pass it off as "Sport"
    
    JimH
    

    
155.1316HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 16:4714
  Here we go I just looked up "sport" in my standard DEC issue American
Heritage Dictionary. 

  SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
  athletics or hunting. 4. Light mockery. 4. One known for the manner of his
  acceptance of rules or a difficult situation. 5. One who lives a gay,
  extravagant life 6. Amorous dalliance; lovemaking. v. 1 To play; frolic.
  2. To joke or trifle. 3 To display or show off adj. Of, relating to, or
  appropriate for sports [from Middle English "sporten", to amuse, divert]

  Ok, where in there does it say that if an activity has a subjective scoring
system it is not a sport?

  George
155.1317GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Wed Jan 04 1995 17:135
    
    	You claim hunting is not a sport and then post that?  That's
    	rich George!
    
    Claybone
155.1318HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 17:3130
RE         <<< Note 155.1317 by GENRAL::WADE "Ah'm Yo Huckleberry..." >>>

>    	You claim hunting is not a sport and then post that?  That's
>    	rich George!
    
  Hey, I'm honest. I found some information and I posted it regardless if
contradicted a minor point in my skating argument or not.

  So ok, I'm willing to admit I'm wrong and hunting is a sport. Now I'm
ready for the long line of crow eaters to line up and admit that skating is
a sport.

  Here it is right in definitions 1 and 2:

    SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
  athletics or hunting. ...

  Figure skating is an active pastime, it's a diversion, and it involves
athletics. Hey, it even involves hunting, remember how the thug that wacked
Kerrigan stalked her around the Country for 3 weeks?

  And NO-where in there does it say that something is not a sport if the
scoring system is subjective. In fact, there doesn't have to be a scoring
system at all for it to be a sport. 

  But hey, I'm willing to accept alternate definitions. Anyone got another
dictionary to back up the point that if an activity has subjective scoring
it is not a sport?

  George
155.1319TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Wed Jan 04 1995 18:0619
    
    
    	Good one, George! I read that defintition of "sport" several days
    ago, and chose to ignore it! :-)
    
    	Just about anything we do fits that definition of "sport",
    including Noting, Tiddlewinks, Chess, and even Nose-picking!!
    
    	So yes, by that definition, I'm willing admit Figure Skating is a
    sport....
    
    JimH
    
    Excuse me now, while I go particpate in the active pastime, oops sport
    of Navel Contemplation... :-)
    
    
    
    	
155.1320Webster drops the ball...FXTROT::ALLEMANGWed Jan 04 1995 18:4612
Re: Eating crow

I'll take it when I deserve it, but this time I'll just refer you to 
note 204.27 where I ducked the dictionary definition at the very start 
of this LDUC.  

BTW, I'm still wondering why figure skaters wear make-up and fancy clothes.
While it is prevelant in many art forms, I can't think of a single sport
where make-up and ruffles are standard equipment.  

Greg
155.1321PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingWed Jan 04 1995 18:539
>BTW, I'm still wondering why figure skaters wear make-up and fancy clothes.
>While it is prevelant in many art forms, I can't think of a single sport
>where make-up and ruffles are standard equipment.  
    
    Football and baseball.  Ever see the anti-glare makeup that ball
    players wear?   Most uniforms are designed less for functionality and
    more for show.
    
    Mark (not a skating fan, but you're wrong on this one)
155.1322HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 19:0016
RE                    <<< Note 155.1320 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>

>I'll take it when I deserve it, but this time I'll just refer you to 
>note 204.27 where I ducked the dictionary definition at the very start 
>of this LDUC.  

  Ok, so what you are saying is that if you ignore any and all existing
definitions of the word SPORT including it's word origin from middle
English then it means what ever you want it to mean.

  Seems the Cheshire Cat made that point to Alice at one time. Perhaps we
could say that the "Figure Skating is not a Sport" claim is a Cheshire
argument.

  -_-
  George
155.1323FXTROT::ALLEMANGWed Jan 04 1995 19:3218
>    Football and baseball.  Ever see the anti-glare makeup that ball
>    players wear?   Most uniforms are designed less for functionality and
>    more for show.
>    
>    Mark (not a skating fan, but you're wrong on this one)


Bull sh!t on both counts.  

The anti-glare make-up has a functional purpose.  Mascara, eyeliner and
blush don't help the figure skater skate any better.  It's different.

Uniforms are first functional, then showy.  Although I'll admit that the
NFL was on the leading edge of the trendy shoulder pad fashion thing.
Next the Yankees will be wearing cotton poofy shirts... 

And lastly, by the dictionary, my Dad's favorite sport is landscaping his
back yard.  Is that the definition of 'sport' most people use?  C'mon.
155.1324MSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Wed Jan 04 1995 19:4310
    
    RE: previous replies
    
    So you can put this one to rest........
    
    CANDLEPIN BOWLING is indeed a sport, based on the prior.
    
    Thanks....case closed!!
    
    RTG
155.1325Wierd sport, fersureODIXIE::ZOGRANTestudo is still grounded!Wed Jan 04 1995 19:547
    What, candlepin bowlers wear makeup, costumes, and are judged on
    "artistic merit"?
    
    Guess I need to read my Sprots Illustrated a little closer when the Top
    10 Candlepin Bowler rankings come out.:-)
    
    UMDan
155.1326HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 20:0524
RE                    <<< Note 155.1323 by FXTROT::ALLEMANG >>>

>Uniforms are first functional, then showy.  Although I'll admit that the
>NFL was on the leading edge of the trendy shoulder pad fashion thing.
>Next the Yankees will be wearing cotton poofy shirts... 

  If uniforms were just functional guys would play in sweat pants and colored
tee shirts. What's the point of pin stripes? Nothing, they are as cosmetic as
eye liner. What was the point of Charlie Finley's ... what was the point of
Charlie Finley? Fluorescent green uniforms and yellow shoes? What's that?

>And lastly, by the dictionary, my Dad's favorite sport is landscaping his
>back yard.  Is that the definition of 'sport' most people use?  C'mon.

  The definition that applies to the sports in this file is the one in #2 below
that talks about athletics or hunting. 

  SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
  athletics or hunting. ...

  That would clearly include NCAA basketball and figure skating but would not
include your dad's landscaping hobby. 

  George
155.1327The World Gardening Championships, live on ESPN!!!! :-)TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Wed Jan 04 1995 20:1418
    
    
    >So you can put this one to rest........
    >
    >CANDLEPIN BOWLING is indeed a sport, based on the prior.
    >
    >Thanks....case closed!!
    
    
    	There was never any doubt!!! :-)
    
    JimH
    
    P.S. Gardening/Landscaping isn't a "specific diversion"? Sure it
    is!!!!
    
    
    
155.1328HELIX::MAIEWSKIWed Jan 04 1995 20:3221
RE<<< Note 155.1327 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

    
>    P.S. Gardening/Landscaping isn't a "specific diversion"? Sure it
>    is!!!!
    
  Read more carefully:

  SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
  athletics or hunting. ...

  Notice it says "as athletics or hunting" in that definition. 

  If you take ALL of definition 2, not just a few words clipped out of context,
it clearly includes things like NCAA basketball, duck hunting, and figure
skating but not landscaping. 

  At any rate, I'm still waiting for anyone to come up with a formal definition
from anywhere that shows sports excluding events when scoring is subjective. 

  George
155.1329OH KING HAL!SPIKED::SWEENEYTom Sweeney in OGOWed Jan 04 1995 20:4910
Save us!

	Is SKATING a sport or not?  Maybe if you make a ruling,
your subjects will stop all this mindless bickering.

	Please help us Hal!  My next unseen finger is sprained,
and I'm afraid of what finger I'll have to us for the next
skating note!

	zamboni
155.1330METSNY::francusThere is no joy in MudvilleWed Jan 04 1995 20:536
re: .1329

I've never seen a discussion sink to such depths that Hal had to be called on
to arbitrate. A sad sad day in ::sprots.

The Crazy Met
155.1331TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Wed Jan 04 1995 21:0817
    
    
    
  >SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
  >athletics or hunting. ...
  >
  >Notice it says "as athletics or hunting" in that definition. 
    
    	Oh come on George, you mean to tell me that you don't recognize the
    phrase "as athletics or hunting" to mean "here are a couple of examples
    of specific diversions". It's not meant to be a complete list. Let's
    not get completely silly about this.... (oops, too late isn't it!!!)
    
    JimH
    
    
    
155.1332I'll be rollin the little ball tonightMSBCS::GALVINR.T. Galvin, PKO2 223-2625Thu Jan 05 1995 11:3913
    
>    Guess I need to read my Sprots Illustrated a little closer when the Top
>    10 Candlepin Bowler rankings come out.:-)
    
>    UMDan
    
    
    Dan,  Believe it or not, there was one story in Sprots Illustrated last
    year related to candlepin bowling.  It wasn't a top 10, but it was a
    tribute to Stacia Czernicki, arguably the best candlepin bowler of all
    time (may she R.I.P.)
    
    RTG
155.1333HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jan 05 1995 12:2419
RE<<< Note 155.1331 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	Oh come on George, you mean to tell me that you don't recognize the
>    phrase "as athletics or hunting" to mean "here are a couple of examples
>    of specific diversions". It's not meant to be a complete list. Let's
>    not get completely silly about this.... (oops, too late isn't it!!!)
    
  Yes they are examples but as with most dictionary definitions they are
meant to give you a flavor of what they mean by "specific". They are saying
that the 2nd definition of the word "sport" refers to a particular class of
diversions including things like athletics and hunting as apposed to the
1st definition that can mean any diversion (i.e. landscaping).

  In any case, the reason I'm arguing this is that people are always saying
that figure skating is not a sport because one aspect of the scoring is
subjective. My point is that there doesn't seem to be any formal definition
of the word "sport" that backs up this point.

  George
155.1334One of our more pointless LDUCsMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRThu Jan 05 1995 12:4532
Arguing over definitions almost always generates more heat than light,
and this thread is no exception.

From .1294:
    
>   The bottom line is: At the end of any particular Figure Skating
>   competition do I always feel like the person on performed best on the
>   ice that particular day won? The answer all to often is no.

Regrettably, those of us who watch figure skating all too often have
the same experience.  I was a part of what I gather is an American
minority that thought Oksana Baiul deserved to win the gold, but I
was uneasy that almost all of the Eastern judges agreed with me and
almost all of the Western judges did not.

In passing, I remark that the citation from JimH's .1294 applies
equally well to boxing, be it amateur or professional.

I agree with JimH that deciding a competition by the opinion of judges
is unsatisfactory.  I even agree a bit with Greg that there is an
element of contrivance in putting together a competition between
practitioners of figure skating, gymnastics, or rock-and-roll dancing.

But the bottom line for me is, do I enjoy watching it?  If I do, I'm
not going to split hairs to decided if it's a sport or not.  I'm just
going to watch.

I have to say I couldn't suppress a chuckle when they announced
individual synchronized swimming as an Olympic sport.  With what
is the individual synchronized???

Steve
155.1335PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingThu Jan 05 1995 14:4311
                    <<< Note 155.1322 by HELIX::MAIEWSKI >>>

>  Ok, so what you are saying is that if you ignore any and all existing
>definitions of the word SPORT including it's word origin from middle
>English then it means what ever you want it to mean.
    
    Which is *precisely* that same thing you did when Clay called you to
    the carpet on "hunting" being included in the dictionary definition of
    "sport".
    
    Mark.
155.1336HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jan 05 1995 16:2619
RE     <<< Note 155.1335 by PCBUOA::LEFEBVRE "PCBU Asia/Pacific Marketing" >>>

>    Which is *precisely* that same thing you did when Clay called you to
>    the carpet on "hunting" being included in the dictionary definition of
>    "sport".
    
  Right, now keep doing your homework Mark and see what happened next.

  First I entered that definition even though it negated a point I had made
earlier about hunting. 

  Second, I was man enough to admit that I was wrong and that hunting clearly
is a sport.

  Now I'm still waiting for someone to have the stones to say "I was wrong,
figure skating is clearly a sport" without embellishing it with a lot of face
saving nonsense.

  George
155.1337GENRAL::WADEAh'm Yo Huckleberry...Thu Jan 05 1995 16:295
    
    	But George, if they admitted that, we would be deprived of
    	your *thought provoking* notes.  ;^)
    
    Claybone
155.1338And the many thought provoking repliesMUNDIS::SSHERMANSteve Sherman @MFRThu Jan 05 1995 16:401
155.1339TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Thu Jan 05 1995 17:3536
    
    
    
>  Now I'm still waiting for someone to have the stones to say "I was wrong,
>figure skating is clearly a sport" without embellishing it with a lot of face
>saving nonsense.
    
    
    	George, you simply found a 'definition' of "sport" that was so
    all-encompassing that it included Figure Skating. Then you changed your
    fundemental concept of what is a sport (i.e. hunting wasn't a sport
    earlier this week, today hunting is a sport. What changed other than
    you looked up 'sport' in your dictionary).
    
    	What we are coming down to is, defining what is a "sport" is an
    individual subjective opinion. About as easy to a grasp on as how much
    does a Figure Skater need to arch her back in order to aesthetically
    please a judge.
    
    	I've already admitted that figure skating met the criteria of being
    a "specific diversion", or an "active pastime". But neither you nor I
    had that concept of sport in mind earlier this week.
    
    	My idea of true "sport" is an atheltic competition in which the
    winner is determined through objective criteria - runs scored, pins
    down, stokes, time elapsed, distance thrown, etc...
    
    	Yours apparently includes contests in which subjective criteria is
    also allowed: Figure Skating, Gymnastics, Rythmic Dancing, etc...
    
    	I can live with that, even though I disagree...
    
    JimH
    
    
    
155.1340TORREY::MAY_BRClinton happensThu Jan 05 1995 17:407
    Figure skating is as much a sport as synchronized swimming.  Can we 
    just leave it at that and cease this discussion.
    
    brews
    
    
    
155.1341Re: .1339 & .1340FXTROT::ALLEMANGThu Jan 05 1995 17:472
What they said.
155.1342HELIX::MAIEWSKIThu Jan 05 1995 17:4926
RE<<< Note 155.1339 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>

>    	I've already admitted that figure skating met the criteria of being
>    a "specific diversion", or an "active pastime". But neither you nor I
>    had that concept of sport in mind earlier this week.
    
  Here's where we disagree. Let me ask you this question. What do you see
as the difference between definitions 1 and 2?

    SPORT n. 1. An active pastime or diversion. 2. A specific diversion, as
  athletics or hunting. 

  You seem to be saying that by "specific diversion" they mean any diversion.
If that's true, then how is definition 2 any different from definition 1?

  I believe that definition 1 means using the word sport in it's original
middle English sense of any diversion and in definition 2 they are using
"athletics" and "hunting" to point out the more modern definition of the
word "sport" which is a reference to either the activity of outdoors type 
sportsmen such as hunters and fishermen or athletic types of sport.

  If definition 2 is not pointing toward the modern definition that you speak
of, why is it there at all? What purpose is definition 2 if it's nothing more
than a repeat of definition 1?

  George
155.1343MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Jan 05 1995 20:3822
><<< Note 155.1339 by TOOK::HALPIN "Cleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!" >>>
>
>    
>    	My idea of true "sport" is an atheltic competition in which the
>    winner is determined through objective criteria - runs scored, pins
>    down, stokes, time elapsed, distance thrown, etc...
>    
>    JimH


	Just curious, does your idea of a true sport then include American
     Gladiators and professional wrestling ?  How about hunting and fishing ?
     Would fishing be a sport only if in a tournament, or would me going out
     fishing on my own count ?  Would deep sea fishing (presumable more
     "athletic" than smelting, for example) be more of a sport than other
     types of fishing ?  How will Newt and the Republicans deal with these
     issues ?

	Sorry, getting carries away there, but I am curious about the answer
     to this first question.

     Rick Rollins
155.1344TOOK::HALPINCleveland Browns - Super Bowl Bound in 1995!Fri Jan 06 1995 12:5214
    
    
    
    >	Just curious, does your idea of a true sport then include American
    > Gladiators and professional wrestling ?
    
    	No. I already stated that earlier this week. Staged performances,
    such as these, in the guise of a sporting event. It is pure
    theatre/entertainment. These things aren't even a true competition.
    
    JimH
    
    
    
155.1345HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 06 1995 13:3712
  The word competition is not part of the definition of the word sport. 

  Perhaps that's the reason for the phrase "competitive sports" to
differentiate sports like basketball and skating where they keep score to
sports like jogging and fishing where they do not. 

  Anyway, someone earlier asked about skaters and makeup and suggested that no
other sport is into cosmetics. I guess that makes me wonder about Denis Rodman.
I understand he recently went from green hair to orange hair. Does that mean
that basketball is not a sport? 

  George 
155.1346HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 06 1995 16:0611
RE Note 206.21 FXTROT::ALLEMANG

>Never mind... it had nothing to do with the great figure skating debate of
>'95.  I like KW... her (art) form is beautiful to behold.  Nice thumbs too.

  Ok so you made a mistake and put it there rather than here. No problem

  So if athletes don't have a number, then it's not a sport? Are you saying
that tennis and golf are not sports?

  George
155.1347Good morning?PCBUOA::LEFEBVREPCBU Asia/Pacific MarketingFri Jan 06 1995 16:124
    George, the loud whooshing is the sound of Allemang's note going over
    your head.
    
    Mark.
155.1348FXTROT::ALLEMANGFri Jan 06 1995 16:135
George,

What part of 'it had nothing to do with the great figure skating debate of
'95' don't you understand?!?!?  
155.1349HELIX::MAIEWSKIFri Jan 06 1995 16:245
  Let's just say I'm skeptical.

  My cynicism alert went off.

  George
155.13502002 Winter GamesKAOT01::M_MORINA dead mean with the most toys is still a dead man.Fri Jun 16 1995 19:065
Anyone have any idea who won the right to host the 2002 Winter Games?

The two main contenders were supposed to be Quebec City and Salt Lake City.

/Mario
155.1351UtahODIXIE::ZOGRANReasonable summer ratesFri Jun 16 1995 19:294
    Salt Lake City won, after trying for 29 years to land them.
    
    UMDan
    
155.1352PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFFri Jun 16 1995 19:293
  Salt Lake City was just awarded the winter Olympics.

	Keith
155.1353HELIX::MAIEWSKIMon Jun 19 1995 18:0110
  Salt Lake City got 54 out of 89 votes to win the 2002 Olympics on the 1st
ballot. Normally it takes 3 or 4 ballots for someone to get the 45 needed so
they won by a comfortable margin. 

  Most likely they would have won the '98 Olympics but a number of the people
voting didn't like the idea of giving the U.S. another Olympics just 2 years
after Atlanta. Nagomo Japan beat out Salt Lake City for 1998 by just a few
votes.

  George