[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference orarep::nomahs::dbms

Title:	VAX DBMS
Notice:	THIS NOTESFILE IS NOT A FORMAL SUPPORT CHANNEL
Moderator:	SCARY::CHARLAND

Created:	Thu Feb 20 1986
Last Modified:	Tue Jun 03 1997
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	2642
Total number of notes:	11044

2624.0. "DDL-F-BADMETSCH?" by M5::BLITTIN () Mon May 05 1997 18:35

    DBMS 6.1
    CDD 5.3
    
    Customer DBO/DELE/SUBSCHEMA DB DEFAULT_SUBSCHEMA, 
    from CDD = Yes.  Then tried to DDL/GENERATE/DEFAULT=(SUBSCHEMA)
    PATHNAME, and gets DDL-F-BADMETSCH, schema stored in metadata file
    'MANDB' does not match expected schema.
    
    I can't find anything about this DDL-F error.  A DBO/DUMP/HEAD &
    DBO/REPORT version and timestamp info is identical.  The only thing
    that I can think of at this point is that the ddl/generate isn't
    looking at the same dictionary as the dbo/report.
    
    What am I missing?
    
    Thank You...

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
2624.1	cdd path specification	NOVA::MJOHNSON	Mark Johnson, Oracle Rdb, Nashua, N.H.	`Mon May 05 1997 19:33`	3
	what cdd pathname is being specified (/PATHNAME or CDD$DEFAULT logical) to the ddl/generate command line?
2624.2	looks like a problem...	NOVA::PCHARLAN	ORACLE CODASYL DBMS Engineering	`Mon May 05 1997 20:40`	6
	We'll look into this (I can reproduce it), but can you please BUG it? In the meantime, you can try defining CDD$DEFAULT to be the pathname, then just use the schema name on the command line (rather than the full pathname). This may work for you, it did for me with the PARTS db. paul
2624.3	Thank You...	M5::BLITTIN		`Mon May 05 1997 21:18`	13
	re: .1 Believe we tried both, but I'll verify this... re: .2 What did you do to reproduce this? I will bug it and try you suggestion. Thank You, Bob
2624.4	Workaround successful...	M5::BLITTIN		`Tue May 06 1997 14:20`	11
	Tried the workaround, define cdd$default device:[dir]manman.mandb, and did ddl/generate/default=(subschema) mandb. This worked, to the customer's delight... Thank you from the customer...and me! Bob I will bug this...
2624.5	Reproducible - Yes	M5::BLITTIN		`Tue May 06 1997 14:29`	3
	Finally figured out what is happening and was able to reproduce the behavior. Will bug this.
2624.6	BUGGED: 488723	M5::BLITTIN		`Tue May 06 1997 15:00`	2
	BUGGED: 488723
2624.7	BUGDBA problem...	M5::BLITTIN		`Tue May 06 1997 19:22`	3
	Not sure if this bug got logged correctly. A query in the bugdb doesn't return anything. I have sent a note to the bugdba folks.
2624.8	BUGDBA Down?	M5::BLITTIN		`Thu May 08 1997 15:31`	4
	Doesn't appear that the BUGDBA is working. I can't submit a bug via this process. I have sent mail to BUGDBA and have not heard anything back from them.
2624.9	BUGGED 497479	M5::BLITTIN		`Fri May 23 1997 18:19`	3
	BUGGED 497479
2624.10	...and fixed	NOVA::PCHARLAN	ORACLE CODASYL DBMS Engineering	`Fri May 23 1997 19:26`	3
	This will be fixed in V7.0 and in any future v6.1 release (after v6.1-11). paul