| Using MAILbus 400, do we support the "per recipient private ext", the "per
message envelope private ext" or do we support both? Microsoft told our
customer that it did a fix for the P1 private extensions for the "per
recipient private ext". We have a customer that is having a problem with
non-del's due to a problem with the private ext. They have ALL-IN-1 3.1,
MB400 2.0.68, XMR 1.2.2 and the Exhange Server has MS-EXCHANGE 4.0 SV-Pak3.
In this article, it just states that Exchange has a fix for the P1
private extensions. The changes the customer has made to his system
were installing XMR 1.2.2 and adding Service Pak 3 to his system.
|
| > Using MAILbus 400, do we support the "per recipient private ext", the "per
> message envelope private ext" or do we support both? Microsoft told our
> customer that it did a fix for the P1 private extensions for the "per
> recipient private ext". We have a customer that is having a problem with
> non-del's due to a problem with the private ext. They have ALL-IN-1 3.1,
> MB400 2.0.68, XMR 1.2.2 and the Exhange Server has MS-EXCHANGE 4.0 SV-Pak3.
Microsoft are wrong - or if they're right, they're talking about something
else! XMR (and ALL-IN-1 V3.2) generates a per-message private extension. This
is the one which was causing Exchange problems, and this is fixed in an
Exchange SP. Details can be found in the chefs::ms-exchange conf, I suspect.
In your case, if you only have ALL-IN-1 V3.1, it must be XMR which is
generating the extension. The latest ECO to XMR, which you seem to have,
allows you to define a logical name to turn off the generation of this
extension.
There are per-recipient extensions present as well: common name, and Teletex
o/r address terms for instance. These have not led to interworking problems
with Exchange as far as I know.
In this article, it just states that Exchange has a fix for the P1
private extensions. The changes the customer has made to his system
were installing XMR 1.2.2 and adding Service Pak 3 to his system.
Are you sure you have the XMR ECO? An anal/image on
sys$common:xmr$mrtox400.exe shows a version of "XMR V1.2-002". (13-may-1996)
If you have got this, have you defined the logical name correctly?:
$ define/nolog XMR$NO_P1EXTENSIONS 1
grahame
|