| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 4063.1 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Wed Jan 10 1996 14:12 | 8 |
| 4063.2 | will DVD sound better for good ? | HANDVC::STEVELIU | | Thu Jan 25 1996 01:44 | 7 |
| 4063.3 | DVD Soundtracks | MILE::JENKINS | | Thu Jan 25 1996 10:41 | 14 |
| 4063.4 | DVD sound uses reduced bit coding to get 5.1 tracks of sound | SSDEVO::THOMPSON | Paul Thompson, Colorado Springs | Thu Jan 25 1996 14:27 | 2 |
| 4063.5 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Jan 25 1996 15:16 | 5 |
| 4063.6 | I thought that DVD had established AC-3 as it's standard | SSDEVO::THOMPSON | Paul Thompson, Colorado Springs | Thu Jan 25 1996 15:57 | 6 |
| 4063.7 | | QUARK::LIONEL | Free advice is worth every cent | Thu Jan 25 1996 17:50 | 4 |
| 4063.8 | Video-CD or CD-Video? | NPSS::NEWTON | Thomas Newton | Wed Apr 23 1997 18:01 | 11 |
|
When you're talking about Video-CDs, are you talking about the MPEG-1
movies on PC-compatible CD-ROMs that have recently started showing up
in computer stores? (These discs offer a whole movie on one CD and I
presume the video quality is terrible. I assume the audio quality is
less than CD because even the audio for most full-length movies would
not fit on a single CD unless compressed and/or reduced in quality.)
Or about the CD-Video discs that briefly showed up several years ago?
(Those discs offered 5 minutes of video and 20 minutes of CD audio on
a 5" disc, and 8" discs were. The audio was CD-quality.)
|
| 4063.9 | typo - left out a word | NPSS::NEWTON | Thomas Newton | Wed Apr 23 1997 18:03 | 3 |
|
8" discs were available.
---------
|