| Title: | Parallel Processing Run Time Library Discussions |
| Moderator: | WTFN::SCALES |
| Created: | Tue Jun 16 1987 |
| Last Modified: | Wed May 21 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 208 |
| Total number of notes: | 920 |
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 180.1 | PPL name length restrictions | DCETHD::CURTIN | Fri Jan 14 1994 19:16 | 16 | |
| 180.2 | CSC32::E_VAETH | Tue Jan 18 1994 17:44 | 1 | ||
| 180.3 | one more thing please | CSC32::E_VAETH | Tue Jan 18 1994 18:19 | 7 | |
| 180.4 | Yes. | DCETHD::CURTIN | Wed Jan 19 1994 17:57 | 5 | |
| 180.5 | CSC32::E_VAETH | Wed Jan 19 1994 18:10 | 1 | ||
| 180.6 | When did max go from 16 to 7? | CSC32::D_SANBORN | Wed Jan 19 1994 20:29 | 7 | |
| 180.7 | Retraction and clarification on which PPL routines have limitations on name length | DCETHD::CURTIN | Wed Jan 26 1994 20:25 | 50 | |
| 180.8 | Not inadvertant... | WTFN::SCALES | Dispair is appropriate and inevitable. | Thu Jan 27 1994 16:18 | 9 |