Title: | IBM PCs, clones, DOS, etc. (archive, new is RANGER::IBMPC-93) |
Notice: | IBMPC-92 archived (read-only); use RANGER::IBMPC-93 |
Moderator: | RANGER::BACKSTROM |
Created: | Thu Mar 26 1992 |
Last Modified: | Mon Jan 25 1993 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 2870 |
Total number of notes: | 18479 |
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1216.1 | Cache? | KAOOA::SOWREY | Fri May 15 1992 17:25 | 5 | |
1216.2 | <Same problem, same machine> | MEXV01::HVAZQUEZ | Fri May 15 1992 17:28 | 15 | |
1216.3 | Same problem | AXIS::BRENCH | Fri May 15 1992 17:37 | 20 | |
1216.4 | EMM386 is always going to be slower ... | AUSTIN::UNLAND | Sic Biscuitus Disintegratum | Fri May 15 1992 18:00 | 18 |
1216.5 | CPU/IO limited? | LANDO::DESHARNAIS | Fri May 15 1992 18:06 | 15 | |
1216.6 | Ncache high is all I ask. | AXIS::BRENCH | Fri May 15 1992 18:20 | 15 | |
1216.7 | CSC32::S_HALL | Gol-lee Bob Howdy, Vern! | Fri May 15 1992 18:26 | 4 | |
1216.8 | some benchmark comparisons | AXIS::BRENCH | Fri May 15 1992 19:04 | 23 | |
1216.9 | It's mostly in the interrupts | MAST::REISERT | Jim Reisert, AD1C | Fri May 15 1992 20:05 | 12 |
1216.10 | I had the same problem | CX3PT3::ROBSVX::R_SCHROEDER | ROB SCHROEDER | Mon May 18 1992 17:47 | 11 |
1216.11 | 386MAX THE ANSWER? | LIOVAX::POELKER | Mon Oct 05 1992 12:39 | 14 |