[Search for users]
[Overall Top Noters]
[List of all Conferences]
[Download this site]
Title: | Advanced Electronic Support |
|
Moderator: | CLARID::ROEMER |
|
Created: | Tue Jun 19 1990 |
Last Modified: | Mon Jun 02 1997 |
Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
Number of topics: | 1026 |
Total number of notes: | 4789 |
1026.0. "wrong syntax in DSN$NOTIFICATION_BATCH.COM ?!" by ATZIS1::SCHIESSER () Wed Apr 30 1997 17:04
Troubleshooting a Notification-problem from NICE to our DELL and CTO-Interface,
we found a problem in DSN$ROOT:[COM]DSN$NOTIFICATION_BATCH.COM.
In our opinion, both notification commands in above procedure are incorrect,
but one of them will still work (?!).
The qualifiers for sending a DSNlink mail should have the format:
/SRQ= ....... OR /ACCESS= .......
Therefore, we have changed the dsn mail command from:
$ ! The notification mail will be sent using the sequence number
$ !
$ dsn mail /srq 'p3 -
"''p1'" -
"''p5'" -
/subject="''p2'" -
/sender="''p4'" -
/personal_name="DSNlink Notification "
to:
->$ ! The notification mail will be sent using the sequence number
->$ !
->$ dsn mail 'p3 -
-> "''p5'" -
-> /srq="''p1'" -
-> /subject="''p2'" -
-> /sender="''p4'" -
-> /personal_name="DSNlink Notification "
and the 2nd dsn mail command, from:
$ ! The notification mail will be sent using the access number
$ !
$ dsn mail 'p3 -
"''p1'" -
"''p5'" -
/subject="''p2'" -
/sender="''p4'" -
/personal_name="DSNlink Notification "
to:
->$ ! The notification mail will be sent using the access number
->$ !
->$ dsn mail 'p3 -
-> "''p5'" -
-> /access="''p1'" -
-> /subject="''p2'" -
-> /sender="''p4'" -
-> /personal_name="DSNlink Notification "
However, normally the access number should be used for any notification, and
this will work with the old syntax too.
This note is only a reminder for a future release.
regards
Hannes
T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines
|
---|