[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference netcad::hub_mgnt

Title:DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE
Notice:Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7
Moderator:NETCAD::COLELLADT
Created:Wed Nov 13 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4455
Total number of notes:16761

3621.0. "ClearVisn Flash loader & TFTP byte count missed" by ROM01::GALLANA (Francesco Gallana) Thu Jun 13 1996 17:06

    Hello,
    
    I updated the firmware in some 900 series module using the new
    ClearVisn Flash Loader software. I was surprised to not find the old
    style TFTP server, expecially the "byte count" field, very usefull to
    know how the down-load is going
    
    The actual TFTP, instead, is very "anonymous"
    
    Did you plan to re-implement this nice feature again?
    
    I hope someone will agree with me about this funcionality.
    
    Thanks
    
    Francesco 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3621.1TFTP ServerNETCAD::FORINOTue Jul 23 1996 20:0619
The NetRider TFTP Server you describe with the block
count went out with HUBwatch V4.0 and the HUBloader.

The newer NetRider TP Server that went out with HUBwatch V4.1
removed the count and replaced it with a blinking
status indicator.  Needless to say many people prefer
the block count.

We had to abandon the NetRider TFTP Server we had in HUBwatch
for clearVISN because it could not do simultaneous loads of
multiple devices.  The Router Manager application required this
feature so that is why we have this new TFTP Server.  

For the next release of clearVISN we want to put a front end GUI
on this TFTP Server that would be similar to what we originally had.
This is the current plan but until we see all the  work for
the next release we are not committing to this.

						John
3621.2STRWRS::KOCH_PIt never hurts to ask...Tue Jul 23 1996 22:308
    
    John,
    
    	I think most people would agree that even if Router Manager needs
    support for mutiple device loads, NETrider V1.1 is more than adequate
    for the loading of hubs & modules. Given how tenuous you were in -.1,
    can you at least put V1.1 on the next CD until you are able to get the
    front-end finished?