[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference netcad::hub_mgnt

Title:DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE
Notice:Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7
Moderator:NETCAD::COLELLADT
Created:Wed Nov 13 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4455
Total number of notes:16761

3146.0. "DECbridge and Multistack" by LISTIM::ULTRIX (Estne Finis, aut Initium Finis...?) Wed Jan 10 1996 14:56

    Hi
    
    	Sorry if it's a stupid question , but I don't know the answer.
    
    	We have a customer which has the new Multistack hub , he has
    a simple configuration with a DECbridge 90FL and 3 DECrepeater 90T.
    	He wants to do the "show repeater" command on the bridge and see
    the repeater , like he does on DEChub90.But no luck , he doesn't have
    any answer.
    	Is this command supposed to work , like in the DEChub ?
    
    	Thanks for your answers 
    
    	Carlos
    
    Note:Yes , all the managment cables are connected as in pages 3-8 or
    3-9 of the Instalattion and configuration.Yes the switches are OK.
    This customer is a previous collegue (Senior Engineer) which accept new
    challenges .... 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3146.1Just one simple questionLISTIM::ULTRIXEstne Finis, aut Initium Finis...?Mon Jan 15 1996 14:1314
    Hi
    
    	My problem is :
    
    	I do a set host/mop <to_dec_bridge> , aferwords I do
    
    	show repetears .... (Nothing is shown)
    
    	Is this supposed to work on the multistack ? it works ok on the
    DEChub.
    
    	Thanks for your help
    
    carlos
3146.2DECbridge: move the rotary switch to "agent"ROM01::GALLANAFrancesco GallanaFri May 16 1997 09:4512
    More than one year later...
    
    We configured the DECbridge 90 as "agent" (switch positioned to "agent"
    instead of "bridge" position) and now it is able to see the repeaters
    
    Since this is an undocumented feature, can somebody tell me if this is
    the right way to support this kind of configuration?
    
    Regards
    
    Francesco