| Thanks. I'm glad to know that will work. Someone had told me that
connecting our repeater to the customer's repeater nose-to-nose like
that was not within specs.
My DEWBR arrived today -- it's so tiny next to the Vitalink -- and it
appears to have a UTP port on it. With an H7082-AA "wall bug" instead
of the DEChub 900 as a power supply, could the DEWBR's RJ45 jack be cabled
directly to the customer's RJ45 UTP Ethernet jack? It's much cheaper.
Also, the installation guide shows the other end of the phone line
connected to a Cisco 7000. At the other end of our phone lines will be
another DECbrouter 90T2. The 90T2's will talk to each other without
the Cisco box, won't they?
Thanks again,
Phil
|
| Yes,
In the Stand-Alone mode, you can use the UTP port (or the side ThinWire
port, not both). I thought your initial note talked about a
DEChub900, sorry. If you use the 10BaseT port, you will need the
external power supply, and you can connect it DIRECTLY to the wall jack
from the facility 10BaseT repeater. If you install a DEChub900 with a
repeater module (lots more dollars), then you will have to connect to
the facility repeater using a FLIP 10baseT cable.
Most 10BaseT Repeaters have a built-in flip, at the 10baseT jack, which
should be marked with an "X". I have replaced several TransLAN
bridges with DECbrouter 90's. You will want to enable routing, I have
found, since it optimizes the traffic on the leased line, and is faster
than the CISCO soft-bridge.
The instructions talk about connecting the DECbrouter90 to another
CISCO, because it thinks it IS a CISCO. The Software package even
boots with the CISCO logo, and identification. I am surprised that it
is shipped with a DEC (08-00-2b-xx) MAC address !!!! It will
communicate with any other router that speaks CHDLC, or other language
supported by your software revision (Other CISCO, DECnis, or
DECbrouter90, etc).
|
| Thanks, John.
You are correct, there is a DEChub900 on order. It's a long story, but
now all that's left is the DEChub and DECbrouter. Future expansion, maybe.
At the risk of further imposition, where is the 5-4-3 rule documented?
Thanks,
Phil
|