[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference netcad::hub_mgnt

Title:DEChub/HUBwatch/PROBEwatch CONFERENCE
Notice:Firmware -2, Doc -3, Power -4, HW kits -5, firm load -6&7
Moderator:NETCAD::COLELLADT
Created:Wed Nov 13 1991
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:4455
Total number of notes:16761

71.0. "MORE-DECREPEATER CONFIG AND RULES" by SNOFS1::MACKENZIE () Mon Nov 02 1992 05:50

================================================================================
Conference:  TWISTED_PAIR_ETHERNET

Topic title: dechub 90, new repeater modules config rules-questions
Note title:                                                      Lines:   80
Author:      SNOFS1::MACKENZIE     
Number:      261.0        Created: 22-Oct-1992 11:18pm           Replies: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (cross posted in Ethernet conference)
            
            Well,
            
            Somebody has to ask the question, again,,so here goes: 
            
            What is the extent of configuration that can be made using 
            the new Decrepeater 90 modules, before one exceeds the 802.3, 
            4 repeater rule ?
            
            I know the fibre DEcbridge can overcome most common 
            configurations, but I would like to understand the 
            configuration extent of the repeater modules, as this does 
            have a cost implication in large configurations
            

Eg 	 A Network of 3 DEchub 90's, A is the centre of a star based 
	 topology  B and C are connected radially to the A central hub.

	 	   	  
	 	   	  	     S STATION A	       		    
	 	   	  	     |  UTP SEGMENT
	 	   	  	     |
	 	   	  	    (R) UTP REPEATER
	 	   	  	     |
	 	   	  ------+----+---- DECHUB 90 BACKPLANE A
	 	   	        |
	 	   	       (R) A 4 PORT FIBRE REPEATER 90FL
	 	   	      /  \
	 	   	     /    \ FOIRL LINK SEGMENTS 1+2
	                    /      \
	 	          B(R)   C(R) FIBRE REPEATER 90FA
	 	   	   |       |
  DEHUB BACKPLABE B --+----+       +-----+------ DECHUB BACKPLANE C
	 	      |                  |	
  	 	     (R)  		(R) UTP REPEATERS
	 	      |	  		 |  UTP SEGMENT 
	 	      |	  		 |
	 	      S STATION B	 S STATION C	


THE ABOVE CONFIGURATION APPEARS TO BE ILLEGAL BASED ON MY UDERSTANDING OF 
THE IEEE REPEATER RULES


1/ A and B, I believe is illegal, because of the 4 copper segments (802.3 
says 3 copper max) and 1 foirl link segment, but only 3 repeaters ?

2 utp copper segments, 2 utp repeaters
2 dechub 90 back plane segments ??
1 foirl fibre segments, 1 foirl repeater

5 segments (but 4 are copper)
3 repeaters

2/ As is the configuration between station B and C, very illegal:

2 utp copper segments, 2 utp repeaters
2 dechub 90 back plane segments ??
2 foirl fibre segments, 2 foirl repeaters

6 segments, 4 repeaters, this I understand to be illegal ?

In the murky world of LANs, many vendors use the full repeater, half 
repeater load definition loosely and fud customers badly, what are we at DEC 
rating the loads of the DEchub backplane, copper and FOIRL repeater modules 
?


I would appreciate any feedback from any committed LANophiles on the subject, 
as these are the common types of questions that our customers spring on us 
with relish.


A pointer to where to get the DEcrepeater documentation over the network 
would also be appreciated.


Tony Mackenzie BBO






T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
71.1answered in TWISTED_PAIR 261.1CGOS01::DMARLOWEPDP 11: MOV -(PC),-(PC)Tue Nov 03 1992 18:501
    
71.2When is a hub a coax segment ?SAC::LANG_HButton up your overcoatWed Feb 03 1993 16:5543
    Hi,
    
        Yes, even after all these notes, I am still a little unsure as to
    the 5-4-3 rule (5 segments, 4 repeaters, 3 coax).
    
    
    Consider the following example...
    
    +-------+ HUB
    |9|   |9|
    |0|   |0|---------- Thin wire (coax)
    |c|   |c|
    +-------+
     |
     | Thin Wire (Coax)
     |
     |
 
     Is this the maximum configuration that can be obtained with 2
    DECrepeater 90Cs, since:
    
    there are 2 thin wire segments leading into the 2 DECrepeater 90s and
    also the backplane of the Hub is counted as a segment since we are
    coming in on one repeater and leaving on another.
    
    If the 2 segments of thin wire both went into the same DECrepeater 90,
    then would I be correct in assuming that would only count as 2 coax
    segments ?
    
    I've been trying to figure out when a HUB is classed as a segment, and
    from discussions that I've had with a colleague, we believe its when we
    have to travel along the bus to get out onto another repeater.
    
    
    Thanks for any input.
    
    
    Harvey Lang
    TCC/S
    UK
    
    
      
71.3Well...CGOS01::DMARLOWEdsk dsk dsk (tsk tsk tsk)Wed Feb 03 1993 20:1931
    This is how I have looked at it for some time.
    
    The workgroup backbone is considered a 65M piece of coax which you can
    extend out of the hub.  It can be extended 125M from the hub or
    up to 55M to a second hub.  It still lives by the rules of coax.
    So if you have 1 90C in the hub, you have 1 repeater attached to
    a piece of thinwire backbone.  Don't forget though that the repeater
    has 6 segments.  Like a DEMPR each segment is repeated to each other
    segment.  Traffic on port 1 also goes out on port 2 (thru 6).  This
    is 2 pieces of coax.  Same for traffic on port 1 to the backplane.
    Traffic goes in one port and comes out all other ports.  If you put a
    second 90C in the hub you have 2 repeaters (3 pieces of coax maximum) 
    between any 2 nodes.
    
    seg. 1             seg. 2             seg. 3
    ---------90C---------------------90C--------
                    hub backbone
    
    If you have not extended the thinwire from the hub one could argue
    that it is so short that you could ignore the fact that it is a
    piece of coax.  At least in terms of timing.  And assuming no segments
    over 185M you may find that everything works just great.  But if
    someone adds coax to the hub or extends some of the segments over
    185M then the network may quit working very quickly.
    
    Maybe an engineer could answer better in terms of timing whether
    to include the hub as a piece of coax or not.  Maybe its too convervative
    counting it that way but I know I won't get into trouble in the future
    if somebody extends things.

    dave
71.4The Official WordEMDS::BUZZELLThu Feb 04 1993 13:1269
    
    
    
 
    
    
                                                DTAC Technical
	                                 	Application Center
        
                                                (DTAC)
            
	                   	                Date: November 5, 1992 
	     	       	 	                From: Chris Di Minico
	     	     		                Dept: DTAC
	     	                                Loc:  MLO3-3/E67
	    			                Ext:  223-0529
				                Net:  KALI::DIMINICO

     

        Subject: DEChub 90 Ethernet Backplane Configuration Rules
        ---------------------------------------------------------

          The DEChub 90 backplane has a number of configuration
          rules and guidelines that must be followed.

           o The DEChub 90 backplane is the equivalent of 65
             meters of ThinWire cable out of the maximum of 
             185 meters for a ThinWire segment WHEN the 
             backplane is connected to a ThinWire Ethernet 
             segment via the backplane BNC connector.

           o The DEChub 90 backplane is the equivalent of 15 stations
             out of the maximum allowance of 30 stations WHEN the 
             backplane is connected to a ThinWire Ethernet 
             segment via the backplane BNC connector.

               


             ------------------
             | DEChub 90      |                      
             | Backplane =    |        T-connector
             |  - 65 meters   |=|-----===-------------=| <- 50 ohm terminator
             |    ThinWire    | ^      |
             |  - 15 Stations | |   +-----------------------+
             |----------------| |   | Up to 15 Stations     |    
                                |   | 120 meters of ThinWire|
                                |   +-----------------------+     
                                Backplane BNC


                           

             The 65 meters and the 15 connector adjustment is required to 
             compensate for the losses associated with matching
             the impedances between the backplane, with or without
             modules inserted, and the ThinWire segment connected to 
             the Backplane BNC. 

             This loss does NOT represent the losses associated with the
             Backplane itself and therefore the 65 meters should NOT be 
             counted in ThinWire repeater topologies that are NOT connected
             via the Backplane BNC.




71.5Confirmation.CGOS01::DMARLOWEdsk dsk dsk (tsk tsk tsk)Thu Feb 04 1993 13:3735
    Chris,
    
    Can I restate your last reply and confirm that what you said was
    in fact what I heard?
    
             The 65 meters and the 15 connector adjustment is required to 
             compensate for the losses associated with matching
             the impedances between the backplane, with or without
             modules inserted, and the ThinWire segment connected to 
             the Backplane BNC. 

>             This loss does NOT represent the losses associated with the
>             Backplane itself and therefore the 65 meters should NOT be 
>             counted in ThinWire repeater topologies that are NOT connected
>             via the Backplane BNC.

    Does this mean that with the backplane terminated it is not counted 
    as a piece of coax in terms of the repeater rules?
    
    thinwire         backplane         thinwire
    ========90C------------------90C===========
            slot 1               slot 2
    
    This is 2 repeaters.  Is this 2 or 3 coax segments??
    
    
    thinwire       backplane   interhub thinwire   backplane      thinwire
    ========90C--------------+=================+-------------90C===========
            slot 1                                           slot 9
    
    This is still 2 repeaters.  This should be 3 coax segments and this
    configuration should not/cannot be connected to a thick/thin wire 
    backbone without the use of a bridge.

    dave
71.6Clear as mud now?CGOS01::DMARLOWEdsk dsk dsk (tsk tsk tsk)Tue Feb 16 1993 16:3614
    I'll answer my last entry having talked to Ed at Network Symposium
    (aka. NET-U).
    
    If the backplane is terminated then the backplane is not counted
    as a coax segment, essentially a zero length segment.  Going in a 90C 
    in slot 1 and out a 90C in slot 5 gives you 2 coax segments and 2 
    repeaters.
    
    However if the hub is not terminated but has a piece of coax connected
    to it then the backplane is counted as a piece of coax.  Going in
    a 90C in slot 1 and out a 90C in slot 5 or out a 90C in the second
    hub now gives you 3 coax segments and 2 repeaters.
    
    dave
71.710BASEFL Config RulesVAXRIO::CARIJOFernando Carijo' - SME, RioThu Mar 04 1993 17:1215
Hello,

I would like to know what are the configuration rules with the new 10BASEF.
That's to say, is the configuration below permitted? It spans more than 2.5 km,
but it doesn't violate the total delay rule, and I would like to use a
configuration like that.

        +----------+          +-------+           +-------+
	|Bridge 90 +==========+ DEFMR +===========+ Bridge+
	+----------+  1.5km   +-------+	  2km	  +-------+

Delay permitted (aprox) : (5 x 2165) + (4 x 2670) = 21505 ns
Delay in the cfg above :  (7 x 2500) + (1 x 2670) = 20170 ns

Carijo'