[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference back40::soapbox

Title:Soapbox. Just Soapbox.
Notice:No more new notes
Moderator:WAHOO::LEVESQUEONS
Created:Thu Nov 17 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:862
Total number of notes:339684

468.0. "Parking Enforcement/Towing" by TROOA::COLLINS (The Seal Of Disapproval) Wed Jun 21 1995 16:10

    
    You.  You own a small business, with three or four parking spots
    available for customer use.  Down the street, the Monstrodome
    charges exorbitant parking fees to the fans who flock to see the 
    daily smearball games.  The fans, as is their wont, instead cruise 
    the neighbourhood looking for free parking.  As usual, they spot 
    your spots, and park, and run.
    
    You now want to remove their cars.  Who should pay the towing
    charge?  The car's owner, when he comes to pick up his car; or
    the property owner, who must then pursue the driver to reclaim
    the cost of towing?
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
468.1DECLNE::SHEPARDIt's the Republicans' faultWed Jun 21 1995 16:125
Put up a sign and tow their arses I say!

The driver will be responsible if they are properly forewarned.

Mikey
468.2SMURF::BINDERFather, Son, and Holy SpigotWed Jun 21 1995 16:137
    If signs are posted explicitly saying that violators of my parking
    space will be towed at the car owners' expense, it's an open-and-shut
    case.  And most towing companies will accept a contract on those terms.
    
    If signs are not posted, I'm probably going to end up eating the towing
    fees.  Until I can get to the sign shop and procure the necessary
    signs.
468.3NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Wed Jun 21 1995 16:133
There should be a sign in the parking lot indicating that it's only for the
use of customers, and that towing is at the expense of the unauthorized
parker.  I've seen dozens of such signs.
468.4The ownerTLE::PERAROWed Jun 21 1995 16:145
    
    Yup, state it as a tow zone and at the owner's expense.
    
    Mary
    
468.5TROOA::COLLINSThe Seal Of DisapprovalWed Jun 21 1995 16:206
    
    Reason I ask is, we just had a court decision here that said it was
    wrong to charge the motorist, EVEN THOUGH the sign explicitly stated
    that his car would be towed at his expense.  I disagree with this
    decision.
    
468.6MOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Wed Jun 21 1995 16:312
Those Canadian Courts. Whatta sensayuma, eh?

468.7Call it "fan relations"DECWIN::RALTOI hate summerWed Jun 21 1995 16:507
    re: Who should pay the towing charge?
    
    Well, that's easy:  the owners of Monstrodome!
    
    Go for the "deep pockets"!
    
    Chris
468.8CALDEC::RAHa wind from the EastWed Jun 21 1995 16:504
    
    >Monstrodome
    
    that some kind of italian soup?
468.9SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIBe vewy caweful of yapping zebwasWed Jun 21 1995 16:515
    
    
    Best to put a sign which reads:
    
    "Violator's cars will be stripped and left on blocks"
468.10CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenWed Jun 21 1995 16:523
    No, it is a relative of the Leviadome, Gargantudome and the
    Humongodome and the Really Really Large Stadium which hasn't been domed
    yet.  
468.11The Fordham Road SolutionMOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Wed Jun 21 1995 16:533
That's "stripped, TORCHED, and left on blocks", Andy.

:^)
468.12SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIBe vewy caweful of yapping zebwasWed Jun 21 1995 16:596
    
    
    Ahhhh.. Jack.... I didn't know we were talking about NYC....
    
    :)
    
468.13NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Wed Jun 21 1995 17:041
Wasn't Monstrodome a guy who made a bunch o' predictions?
468.14CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenWed Jun 21 1995 17:077
    You are thinking of Monstrodomus.  He predicted there would be great
    structures capable of seating thousands that would swill weak alcoholic
    beverages by the gallons and create huge clouds of methane gas while
    watching men in tight pants hit each other.  A true vision of the
    apocalypse if there ever was one.  
    
    
468.15MOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Wed Jun 21 1995 17:081
Didn't play ball hisself, though?
468.16NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Wed Jun 21 1995 17:102
I thought Monstrodomus was the Latin version of his name, but he was a
Frenchman named Monstrodome.
468.17CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenWed Jun 21 1995 17:196
    True, he wrote the Monstrodomicon.  He also predicted the facilities
    would be used to round of the citizenry under the guise of the Nuevo 
    Orderi del Mundo.  Truly frightening.  
    
    Oh for the towing thing, make the interlopers pay.  I had to, they
    should too.  
468.18Fay Wray thought it "gave him character"DECWIN::RALTOI hate summerWed Jun 21 1995 17:484
    I thought Monstrodome is what King Kong changed his name to after
    he lost his hair.
    
    Chris
468.19NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Wed Jun 21 1995 17:491
Nah, he joined The Hair Club For Apes.
468.20:-)WMOIS::GIROUARD_CWed Jun 21 1995 17:527
    hey, did this question really deserve its very own note or could it
    have been put in the TTWA note?
    
    hey, did my question belong in this note or should I have entered it
    into the TTWA note?
    
    hey, ...
468.21CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenWed Jun 21 1995 18:342
    Whack!  There, that should fix the endless loop you seem to be falling
    in.  :-)
468.22AlternativeWREATH::SNIDERBecause that's the way it IS!Wed Jun 21 1995 19:4822
    Back to the original question...
    
    I assume that the issue is about parking spaces that are needed for
    customers patronizing an establishment with hours that overlap the ball
    game.
    
    However, if your store closes at say 5:00 and the ball game is at 7:00,
    then why not consider being a good neighbor in the community and allow 
    non-patrons to park?  Then put up a sign that says, 
    "Park here free 5:00 to 10:00 courtesy of (establishment name)."
    
    We all have to live on this stinking planet together.  Why not loosen
    up a little?  Sure, you can take a hard-nosed attitude and post
    absolutely no parking 'cause it's MY property.
    
    And yes, I'm fully aware of that pesky liability concept.  Insurance
    companies and lawyers be damnned.
    
    I have a friend who's been there and tried that.  It works!  People
    remember the generosity and come back to drop their greenbacks.
    
    \Lou
468.23WREATH::SNIDERBecause that's the way it IS!Wed Jun 21 1995 19:577
    Sorry....I lost sight of the original question.
    
    My take - If the spaces were needed for commerce during the time the
    violator parked there, then definitely the car owner pays.
    
    If the spaces are not needed at the time, then my previous comments
    (.-1) apply.
468.24CSC32::D_STUARTWed Jun 21 1995 21:194
    1. do you own the parking spots or are they public property 
       conviently located in from of your shop.
    2. what's the local law have to say about restricting access
       if they are indeed public parking spots.
468.25TROOA::COLLINSThe Seal Of DisapprovalWed Jun 21 1995 21:213
    
    The spots are on your private property.
    
468.26MOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Wed Jun 21 1995 22:358
>    The spots are on your private property.
    
WOW! That wasn't clear from the basenote.

And the court didn't feel the parkers should pay?

Amazing. Are your liberal judges in Canada elected or appointed?

468.27TROOA::COLLINSBaked, not friedThu Jun 22 1995 01:443
    
    Appointed.
    
468.28MOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Thu Jun 22 1995 02:242
Well there's another argument against Canadian gun control, then.

468.29TROOA::COLLINSBaked, not fried.Thu Jun 22 1995 02:497
    
    FWIW, I have not read the exact reasoning behind the judge's decision,
    and it may rest on a fine point of the written law rather than on the
    general principle.  As I said, though, I disagree with this decision.  
    It's unfair to expect the landowner to pay up front and take the motorist
    to court to recover the towing fee.
    
468.30DELNI::SHOOKStill in the NRAThu Jun 22 1995 07:459
    
    post  "private property/no parking"  and "violators will pay fee"
    signs around the property and then construct a fence around the
    parking area with a lockable gate on it. 
    
    when the offending parkers leave their cars, shut the fence and lock them 
    in. when they try to retrieve their cars, charge 'em $20.00 to get their
    cars back. 
    
468.31WMOIS::GIROUARD_CThu Jun 22 1995 10:591
    or... air is fairly easy to remove from tires, isn't it?
468.32CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenThu Jun 22 1995 12:262
    ....and even more difficult to put back in if the stem has been er, um,
    fixed.  
468.33$500.00 "towing fee", $100.00 per hour "storage fee", etc etc....PERFOM::LICEA_KANEwhen it's comin' from the leftThu Jun 22 1995 12:3413
    
    Well, in one of the more obscure laws recently passed (and signed into
    law, believe it or not) by the Republican Congress, in their "new
    federalism" (where they overrule state law) they say that not only
    can a private towing company tow your car away, not only is the
    car owner responsible for paying any towing and other fees, the
    car owner is reponsible for paying *ANY* fees the towing company
    demands.
    
    And there's not a damn thing you the car owner can do about it.  Pay up
    or lose your car.
    
    								-mr. bill
468.34POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 12:364
    
    That would encourage me not to park in tow zones, that's for sure.
    
    Not that I do now, of course, being the law abiding sort that I am.
468.35SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIBe vewy caweful of yapping zebwasThu Jun 22 1995 13:039
    
    re: .33
    
    So?  What's the problem?
    
    You don't do the deed... you don't get fined.. (by anybody!)
    
    Seems simple to me...
    
468.36WAHOO::LEVESQUEMr BlisterThu Jun 22 1995 13:127
     Obviously, the problem is that a situation has been created wherein a
    certain infraction can result in a disproportionate punishment, with no
    accountability or checks and balances, and to the personal profit of
    some individuals. It would appear to be legalized piracy.
    
     "You were parked illegally." "No, I wasn't." "Yes, you were, and it'll
    cost you more than the car is worth to get it back." <sinister laugh>
468.37WMOIS::GIROUARD_CThu Jun 22 1995 15:566
    oh, this is great. legal matters settled on what's reasonable. now
    there's an objective agle to base a legal system on!
    
    O Canada...
    
    
468.38POLAR::RICHARDSONWhirly Twirly NapsThu Jun 22 1995 16:111
    We don't base anything on agles up here.
468.39POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 17:202
    
    How about aglets?
468.40POLAR::RICHARDSONWhirly Twirly NapsThu Jun 22 1995 17:261
    Where are they at?
468.41WMOIS::GIROUARD_CThu Jun 22 1995 17:271
     what? the agles?
468.42POLAR::RICHARDSONWhirly Twirly NapsThu Jun 22 1995 17:271
    No, the aglets.
468.43POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 17:292
    
    I refuse to answer a question that ends with a preposition.
468.44WMOIS::GIROUARD_CThu Jun 22 1995 17:351
    aglets is a preposition?
468.45POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 17:462
    
    No, 'at'!
468.46POLAR::RICHARDSONWhirly Twirly NapsThu Jun 22 1995 17:471
    Is that what you're on about?
468.47POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 17:502
    
    Stop that at once, or I shall be forced to punish you.
468.48WMOIS::GIROUARD_CThu Jun 22 1995 17:541
    i'm sorry...
468.49POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 18:084
    
    Not you, Chip 8^).
    
    
468.50NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Thu Jun 22 1995 18:113
>    No, 'at'!

I see you're willing to end an exclamation with a preposition.
468.51POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 18:154
    
    Yes, I am.  One of my favourites is "@#$%&* off!"  8^)
    
                                             
468.52:)SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIBe vewy caweful of yapping zebwasThu Jun 22 1995 18:218
    
    <--------
    
    >favourites
    
    Are we leaning to the English way of things now my dear???
    
    
468.538^)POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 18:262
    
    ..._now_?  Where have you been?
468.54:) :)SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIBe vewy caweful of yapping zebwasThu Jun 22 1995 18:2810
    
    
    
    Ummmmmmm..... MKO1-1/A10 ?????
    
    
     Hold on.. let me check... (as he stands up to look at the pole)...
    
     Yep!!!!!!! There I am!!!!!!!
    
468.55MOLAR::DELBALSOI (spade) my (dogface)Thu Jun 22 1995 18:462
Everytime I look down, I see my aglets.

468.56POLAR::RICHARDSONWhirly Twirly NapsThu Jun 22 1995 18:471
    You never wear pants?
468.57%^>GAVEL::JANDROWGreen-Eyed LadyThu Jun 22 1995 18:537
    
    
    andy, mz_deb has this wonderfully annoying habit of throwing in u's
    where they don't belong.  just ignore her...
    
    
    
468.58POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 18:593
    
    It's certainly not my fault that you colonists don't know how words are
    properly spelt 8^o.
468.59DEVLPR::DKILLORANM1A - The choice of champions !Thu Jun 22 1995 19:035
    Mz Deb,
        I thought you were in MSO land,.... 
    Isn't that in Maynard, MA  US of A  ? ? ?
    
    Dan
468.60NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Thu Jun 22 1995 19:041
Spelt -- isn't that a wheat-like grain?
468.61.59POWDML::LAUERLittle Chamber of PasshionThu Jun 22 1995 19:052
    
    Yes, yes, I am and it is.  Next question 8^)?
468.62TROOA::COLLINSAural SectsThu Jun 22 1995 22:3021
    
    So you decided to take your son to see the local smearball team,
    the Shelbyville Shelbyvillains, at the Monstrodome.  The parking fee
    was $15, and you decided that was TOO much.  You decided to drive
    around the area to see if you could find a cheaper spot.  You noticed
    this Dry Cleaner's, which was closed.  There were a few cars parked out
    front, even though the sign said that: "Cars will be towed at owner's
    (sic) risk and expense!".  You decided, "Hey, what the hey, the store is
    closed, and there are other cars here.  It won't matter if I park here."
    
    Unbeknownst to you, however, the owner of the Dry Cleaner's had
    contracted a towing company to patrol the lot after hours and grab
    whatever it could find.  They towed your car away, along with all the other
    cars there, and when you finally found the impound lot, the fee to have
    your car released was $250, which you didn't have.  No problem, you
    decided to come back the next day, but they charged an extra $50 a night
    for storage.
    
    Were you happy?  Was this fair?
    
    
468.63sounds fair to me..DELNI::SHOOKStill in the NRAFri Jun 23 1995 05:243
    i'm going to buy a tow truck and head up to "shelbyville!!" 
    
    
468.64DELNI::SHOOKStill in the NRAFri Jun 23 1995 07:373
    re. 62
    
    is the monstrodome the one with the falling cieling tiles?
468.65WMOIS::GIROUARD_CFri Jun 23 1995 10:444
    whew... thanks Deb. i can now go into the weekend without a worry in
    the world!
    
    :-)
468.66BOXORN::HAYSSome things are worth dying forFri Jun 23 1995 11:317
Sung to the tune of some old song:

Singing way hey tow them away
We plunder the streets of your town
be it edsel or chevy
there is no car too heavy
and we always collect our fee
468.67CONSLT::MCBRIDEReformatted to fit your screenFri Jun 23 1995 12:107
    RE: .62
    
    Happy?  No but it has happened to me so it is only fair it happens to
    others :-).  Seriously, if it says no parking, you are at risk for
    ignoring the warning.  
    
    Brian
468.68GAVEL::JANDROWGreen-Eyed LadyFri Jun 23 1995 12:133
    
    
    what he said
468.69WMOIS::GIROUARD_CFri Jun 23 1995 12:521
    what she said he said
468.70SOLVIT::KRAWIECKIZebwas have foot-in-mouth disease!Fri Jun 23 1995 13:106
    
    
    Like Baretta used to say in that oooooooooold TV series...
    
    "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time!"
    
468.71Talk about a get rich quick schemeASDG::GASSAWAYInsert clever personal name hereFri Jun 23 1995 14:2424
    What if your car was parked legally and got towed anyway?
    
    Suppose I had a tow truck and a pal on the police force, and one day I
    went out and stopped at the end of every street and towed the car
    parked closest to corner and got my pal to write a ticket saying
    allthese cars were parked within ten feet of the corner, regardless of
    whether they were 10 or 20 feet from the corner.  Then I took all these
    cars and locked them up and charged the owners $500 to get them back,
    plus $100 for the storage for the night. 
    
    A good plan?
    
    At least as good a plan as going around during the winter when Boston
    had 100 inches of snow and ticketing all the cars parked adjacent to
    the snowbanks for being more than a foot from the curb.  Or going to
    the MIT campus and ticketing all the students cars for storage
    violations (leaving your car in the same parking space for more than 24
    hours is illegal, although on campus, where most of the students don't
    have a reason to go out and move their car every day, is the only place
    I've ever seen it enforced).
    
    Forget education, go out and buy yourself a tow truck.
    
    Lisa
468.72DECLNE::SHEPARDIt's the Republicans' faultFri Jun 23 1995 14:4614
RE: .71 

	A good plan long as one can get away with it!   Smacks of something
illegal to me.  Sounds like this note is going the way of many others.  I
wouldn't want people parking in front of my business after hours.  They are
likely to litter up my parking lot with glass bottles, etc.  Would you want one
of your best customers to have a flat or worse a cut in the foot!  As far as the
fee charged for the towing, don't park illegally, and you don't have to worry
about it.  A high towing fee will discourage those who feel it's worth $100 to
find this primo parking space.  Besides if they happen not to get towed, they
pay nothing for the space.  Are you against me charging for the use of my
property?

Mikey
468.73How would you prove your car was parked legallyASDG::GASSAWAYInsert clever personal name hereFri Jun 23 1995 16:067
    
    One would not have to park to litter your parking lot with debris.
    One would not even have to walk on your property to litter it with
    debris.  A beer bottle thrown in your general direction would do the
    trick.
    
    Lisa
468.74DECLNE::SHEPARDIt's the Republicans' faultFri Jun 23 1995 18:135
There is a difference between incidental littering, and inviting people onto
one's property unsupervised.  As far as proving legal parking those spaces are
usually marked, (or unmarked by No Parking Here signs).

Mikey
468.75COVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertWed Nov 06 1996 14:1213
468.76BUSY::SLABSubtract A, substitute O, invert SWed Nov 06 1996 14:516
468.77POLAR::RICHARDSONPatented Problem GeneratorWed Nov 06 1996 14:521
468.78ACISS2::LEECHTerminal PhilosophyWed Nov 06 1996 18:2216
468.79It still isn't being dropped...COVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertWed Nov 06 1996 18:274
468.80ACISS2::LEECHTerminal PhilosophyWed Nov 06 1996 19:282
468.81POLAR::RICHARDSONPatented Problem GeneratorWed Nov 06 1996 19:472
468.82WMOIS::GIROUARD_CThu Nov 07 1996 10:091
468.83you don't mean initial reports could be incomplete, do you?WAHOO::LEVESQUESpott itjThu Nov 07 1996 11:013
468.84SUBSYS::NEUMYERVote NO on Question 1Thu Nov 07 1996 13:168
468.85BUSY::SLABSubtract A, substitute O, invert SThu Nov 07 1996 13:265
468.86OVRWKD::RANDOLPHTom R. N1OOQThu Nov 07 1996 13:273
468.87NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Thu Nov 07 1996 13:345
468.88RUSURE::EDPAlways mount a scratch monkey.Thu Nov 07 1996 13:3729
468.89PENUTS::DDESMAISONSperson BThu Nov 07 1996 14:044
468.90I'm not the only one assuming here...OVRWKD::RANDOLPHTom R. N1OOQThu Nov 07 1996 14:3939
468.91PENUTS::DDESMAISONSperson BThu Nov 07 1996 14:488
468.92OVRWKD::RANDOLPHTom R. N1OOQThu Nov 07 1996 14:575
468.93MKOTS3::JMARTINBe A Victor..Not a Victim!Thu Nov 07 1996 19:1613
468.94your worst nighmare...BSS::PROCTOR_RAwed FellowThu Nov 07 1996 19:195
468.95POLAR::RICHARDSONPatented Problem GeneratorThu Nov 07 1996 19:214
468.96SMURF::WALTERSThu Nov 07 1996 19:254
468.97DO be careful of domestic disputes..BSS::PROCTOR_RAwed FellowThu Nov 07 1996 19:2827
468.98BUSY::SLABSubtract A, substitute O, invert SThu Nov 07 1996 19:334
468.99DECWIN::JUDYThat's *Ms. Bitch* to you!!Thu Nov 07 1996 19:403
468.100I didn't wait around to find out...BSS::PROCTOR_RPet your Peeve today!Thu Nov 07 1996 19:417
468.101NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Thu Nov 07 1996 19:461
468.102DECWET::LOWEBruce Lowe, DECwest Eng., DTN 548-8910Thu Nov 07 1996 22:193
468.103BUSY::SLABSubtract A, substitute O, invert SThu Nov 07 1996 22:306
468.104polite and helpfulOVRWKD::RANDOLPHTom R. N1OOQFri Nov 08 1996 11:088
468.105DECWIN::JUDYThat's *Ms. Bitch* to you!!Fri Nov 08 1996 13:094
468.106polite and helpful, woah yah!ASIC::RANDOLPHTom R. N1OOQFri Nov 08 1996 13:2717
468.1077361::SHERKI belong! I got circles overme i'sFri Nov 08 1996 13:427
468.108SMURF::MSCANLONa ferret on the barco-loungerFri Nov 08 1996 14:0410
468.109SMURF::WALTERSTue Nov 12 1996 11:586