[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference back40::soapbox

Title:Soapbox. Just Soapbox.
Notice:No more new notes
Moderator:WAHOO::LEVESQUEONS
Created:Thu Nov 17 1994
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:862
Total number of notes:339684

294.0. "Virtual Community/Global Village" by TROOA::COLLINS (Distributed being...) Mon Feb 13 1995 13:51

    Is the network creating an unhealty replacement for face-to-face
    interaction, or is the "virtual community" that exists here and
    on the Internet a positive development in society?
    
================================================================================
Note 41.390                         Good Bye                          390 of 392
DOCTP::BINNS                                         24 lines  13-FEB-1995 10:29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I've enjoyed the vitality of Soapbox. I think the kind of "virtual
    community" created by this form of technology can be fun and
    enlightening.  
    
    But I can never land completely on one side, so I must also say that I
    find this kind of virtual community a bit ominous to the extent that it
    replaces real community, community with the real human interaction, the
    need for compromise, the dirty day-to-day work of living *in* life, and
    instead encourages our tendency to flit across the surface, dropping a
    few bombs or bon mots and then surfing off in search of the next rush.
            
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
294.1SMURF::BINDERvitam gustareMon Feb 13 1995 14:1731
    like most technology, the net is a blessing.  but also like most such
    blessings, it is not unmixed.
    
    humans, as a general rule, need interaction with others of their kind. 
    not interaction with a terminal and a batch of email, but intercourse
    (social, you dirty-minded schmeckels) on a face-to-face basis.  the
    touch of a hand, the sight of a smile, these necessities cannot be
    replaced by emoticons.
    
    it has been pretty well recognized that electronic communication tends
    to be more abrasive, and often more ill-considered, than face-to-face
    dialogue.  this is, i think, because one feels somewhat immune to
    reprisal - but more, i'd say, it's because one simply does not
    recognize what one's words do to the recipient.  out of sight really
    does mean out of mind.  you're there, i'm here, and i don't give a
    rat's patootie that what i said hurt you enough to make you cry.  i
    said what i wanted to say, and it's tough noogies if you didn't want to
    hear it.  when you're looking someone in the eye, it's harder to do
    that.
    
    the "me" generation's home is cyberspace.  and i don't much care for
    it.
    
    on the other hand, i rely on cyberspace to accomplish my job, and i do
    also derive much pleasure from my communication through the ether.  i
    have a friend in vienna whom i've never seen (except in photos); i met
    him when he sent me an out-of-the-blue mail message in latin.  i relish
    contacts of that sort.
    
    it's good, and it's bad.  it may well bring out the best and the worst
    in us.
294.2PNTAGN::WARRENFELTZRMon Feb 13 1995 14:184
    Dick:
    
    One thing you can say about the innnernet as compared to human contact,
    you can't catch a cold on a modem.
294.3What ever happened to up close and personal?DECLNE::REESEToreDown,I'mAlmostLevelW/theGroundMon Feb 13 1995 16:228
    This AM the Today Show featured people who "fell in love" over the
    net.....must say seemed a tad bizarre to me.  Three of the couples
    featured have gotten married.  A fourth couple got married "on-line"
    :-}
    
    Gives a whole new meaning to "reach out and touch someone" :-} :-}
    
    
294.4POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureMon Feb 13 1995 16:337
    
    I know of three people in the show that told me they met their spouse
    or SO over the 'net, both between different states and between different 
    countries, even.
    
    It's the 90's way.  Why should we be limited to the boy next door?
                              
294.5SMURF::BINDERvitam gustareMon Feb 13 1995 16:4323
    .4
    
    > Why should we be limited to the boy next door?
    
    you're not.  from this month's macuser magazine:
    
    ----------
    
    				ADULT CD-ROMS
    FREE CATALOG			     We BEAT any Advertised price!
    INTERACTIVE CDs					    DIGITAL MOVIES
    Vampire's Kiss *NEW* $54 Full Screen Video!   Baby's Got B_tt .... $23
    Maddams Family ..... $42			  Hidden Obsessions .. $23
    Virgins 1&2 *NEW* .. $42 ea	     PHOTO DISCS
    The Barlow Affairs . $35	     Elite American Girls Vols 1&2  $29 ea
    Inferno ............ $35	     Elite European Girls Vols 1&2  $29 ea
    Dream Machine ...... $50
    Virtual Vixens ..... $42	     Virtual 3D Adult Sampler CD ... $9.95
    
    ------------
    
    there's more, but you get the drift.  this is one of 15 such ads in the
    magazine.  reach out and watch a pro.  or two.  whatever.
294.6oh dear!POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureMon Feb 13 1995 16:571
    
294.7MKOTS3::JMARTINYou-Had-Forty-Years!!!Mon Feb 13 1995 16:595
    Debra:
    
    What Dick doesn't really want to admit is that he subscibes to
    Wrestling magazine and really saw the ads there.  AAAHHAAAAA Dick
    thinks wrestling is real!!!
294.8TROOA::COLLINSDistributed being...Mon Feb 13 1995 17:036
    
    One point that could be raised here is that the `virtual' contact
    that has been made in Soapbox has led to genuine face-to-face
    interaction between people who might not otherwise have been aware
    of each other (BoxBashes).
    
294.9<-- yes, yesPOWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureMon Feb 13 1995 17:061
    
294.10POBOX::BATTISContract StudmuffinMon Feb 13 1995 17:514
    
    Have to agree with John in .8
    
    Mark
294.11POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerMon Feb 13 1995 18:291
    <----- I have to agree that you agree with John in .8
294.12POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerMon Feb 13 1995 18:311
    						I agree.	------>
294.13POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureMon Feb 13 1995 18:322
    
    SOMEBODY is surely living up to his new personal_name today.
294.14POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerMon Feb 13 1995 18:332
    Have to agree with John in .8

294.15SX4GTO::OLSONDoug Olson, SDSC West, Palo AltoMon Feb 13 1995 18:5623
    > But I can never land completely on one side, so I must also say that I
    > find this kind of virtual community a bit ominous to the extent that it
    > replaces real community, community with the real human interaction, the
    > need for compromise, the dirty day-to-day work of living *in* life, and
    > instead encourages our tendency to flit across the surface, dropping a
    > few bombs or bon mots and then surfing off in search of the next rush.
    
    Brother, do I hear that.  I might have worded it differently, but the
    encouraged tendency bit was right on, and highlights a spectacular
    aspect; there's even a book about it now, something to do with
    flamewars.  I quibble that we aren't replacing real community, we're
    augmenting it; people have always been able to be loners, and that will
    continue; adding another venue for social interaction hasn't removed
    any of the others, just given us more choices and, I suppose, more
    opportunity cost to the choices we make of how we spend our time.  It
    may be easier for loners to avoid people now, hiding the fact even from
    themselves that they're living through their keyboards; and given how
    easy it is, maybe we'll see more of such types.  So everything has its
    costs; the plugged-in social dropouts at least have more interaction,
    less time alone-in-the-head, than did their predecessors; so I'm not as
    worried about the net breeding a new set of mass murderers.
    
    DougO
294.16TROOA::COLLINSDistributed being...Mon Feb 13 1995 19:454
    
    Well...*I* HAVE to agree with John in .8, or I'd be
    a hypocrite!   :^)
    
294.17COSME3::HEDLEYCLager LoutMon Feb 13 1995 20:384
I've got a KiloStream stapled to my wall, does that mean I'm part of this
so called `global village' (pass the barf bag, someone)

Chris.
294.18POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerMon Feb 13 1995 20:421
    Betta getta bucket, there's still more.
294.19POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 02:202
    
    Gaston!  Another bucket for monsieur.
294.20POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerTue Feb 14 1995 02:221
    And perhaps a hhhhhose....
294.21POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 02:253
    
    ...and finally, monsieur, a waffffer-thin mint.
                                            
294.22POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerTue Feb 14 1995 02:271
    Ugh... No, I couldn't eat another thing. I'm absolutely stuffed.
294.23POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 02:523
    
    Oh sir, just...just *one*...
    
294.24POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerTue Feb 14 1995 03:021
    f*** off I'm full!
294.25POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 03:063
    
    Oh sir... it's only *wafffer* thin.
                              
294.26POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerTue Feb 14 1995 03:121
    Alright then, just one.
294.27POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 03:182
    
    Just the one, sir... voila... bon appetit...
294.28POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerTue Feb 14 1995 03:254
    Stttttreeeeeettttcchhhhhh
    
    
    KA-BOOM!!
294.29HBFDT1::SCHARNBERGSenior KodierwurstTue Feb 14 1995 06:5012
    I can't agree with .8
    
    There's just one single Boxer I've ever met in real life.
    It would've been more, if the EuroBash hadn't been canceled. 
    
    
    I have a handful of photos and about 2 WWW-homepages, so there are 
    some faces to the names. 
    
    Well, we should perhaps start another pledge.
    
    Heiko
294.30LJSRV2::KALIKOWTechnology Hunter/GathererTue Feb 14 1995 06:539
    Wot pledge would that be then?
    
    "I pledge undying loyalty to any & all Kodierwursts, & always to wear
    unwashed Lederhosen..."
    
    Wuz I close?
    
    |-{:-)
    
294.31HBFDT1::SCHARNBERGSenior KodierwurstTue Feb 14 1995 09:1911
    
    Errm, was I too arrogant in estimating my command of the English
    language once again ?
    
    I was referring to the great Get-Fat-Boy-Jamie-over-the-pond fund.
    (And I was not serious. One day I'll come and y'all better be ready
    and all that stuff. (ho!ho! included.)
    
    Heiko
    
    
294.32LJSRV2::KALIKOWTechnology Hunter/GathererTue Feb 14 1995 09:274
    I'd PAY to see that!!!!!
    
    |-{:-)
    
294.33USAT05::WARRENFELTZRTue Feb 14 1995 10:411
    .8  maybe not enuf face to face, or in Glen S's case,........oh well.
294.34oh dearPOWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 11:401
    
294.35BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 12:247
| <<< Note 294.16 by TROOA::COLLINS "Distributed being..." >>>


| Well...*I* HAVE to agree with John in .8, or I'd be a hypocrite!   :^)

	Joan, you could NEVER be a hypocrite.... :-)

294.36BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 12:256
| <<< Note 294.33 by USAT05::WARRENFELTZR >>>


| .8  maybe not enuf face to face, or in Glen S's case,........oh well.

	<grin>.... what r u tryin to say Ron????? :-)
294.37Beyond today's boxKAOA00::KAOU55::MCGREGORTue Feb 14 1995 12:2913
What will the future of the box look like?

Well my guess is that pictures and sound will evolve in the near future.
Sort of the evalution of the talkies in the film industry.

We'll be able to put a face to those characters being typed. I'm not sure this
will help out in Glenn's case though.
 We'll be able to have real arguements instead of cap's. 
Tones of the voice will really change the character of the box.

What are you wearing today will become a fashion show.

	Allan
294.38POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 12:449
    
    <-- how very futuristic 8^).
    
    >I'm not sure this
    >will help out in Glenn's case though.
    
    True, we've already seen Glenn, and the general consensus was that he
    is a devastatingly handsome man.  Seeing him in the box every day might
    distract women from their work 8^).
294.39BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 12:5210
| <<< Note 294.38 by POWDML::LAUER "LC of Inexpressible Rapture" >>>


| True, we've already seen Glenn, and the general consensus was that he is a 
| devastatingly handsome man. Seeing him in the box every day might distract 
| women from their work 8^).

	Oh sure.... when men say men, you want them to include women..... but
give you a chance to RETURN the favor, and what do you do!!?? Hmmmph.... tap
tap tap tap tap.....
294.40USAT05::WARRENFELTZRFortius,aka I'm Outta Here!Tue Feb 14 1995 13:183
    Glen:
    
    My daddy never told me to turn my back, oh well, you know   :-)
294.41BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 13:206
| <<< Note 294.40 by USAT05::WARRENFELTZR "Fortius,aka I'm Outta Here!" >>>


| My daddy never told me to turn my back, oh well, you know   :-)

	You straight boyz..... always flattering yourselves.... :-)
294.42USAT05::WARRENFELTZRFortius,aka I'm Outta Here!Tue Feb 14 1995 13:213
    Glen:
    
    I'd rather flatter myself than you... :-0
294.43BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 13:234


	DOH!
294.44POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 13:4710
    
    I'm sorry, Glen...hold on...
    
 
    True, we've already seen Glenn, and the general consensus was that he is a 
    devastatingly handsome man. Seeing him in the box every day might distract 
    women AND men from their work 8^).
                  
    ...should I have said, "Seeing THEM in the box..."?  Since we're
    getting picky and all 8^).
294.45BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 13:5614
| <<< Note 294.44 by POWDML::LAUER "LC of Inexpressible Rapture" >>>


| True, we've already seen Glenn, and the general consensus was that he is a
| devastatingly handsome man. Seeing him in the box every day might distract
| women AND men from their work 8^).

	MUCH better Deb....

| ...should I have said, "Seeing THEM in the box..."?  Since we're getting 
| picky and all 8^).

	No, Leslie will do..... :-)

294.46POLAR::RICHARDSONWeird Canadian Type GeezerTue Feb 14 1995 14:153
    Have cocking board, will travel.
    
    Leslie
294.47BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 14:163

	Gotta luv that cocking board! 
294.48POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 14:242
    
    Is it anything like bristle board?
294.49BIGQ::SILVASquirrels R MeTue Feb 14 1995 14:296
| <<< Note 294.48 by POWDML::LAUER "LC of Inexpressible Rapture" >>>


| Is it anything like bristle board?

	I think the proper name would be pubic board..... 
294.50SMURF::BINDERvitam gustareTue Feb 14 1995 15:1710
    .37
    
    global village time complete with pictures, huh?  ain't in the future,
    it's here now, at least if you don't need motion.  sound?  on its way.
    
    http://www.zk3.dec.com/~binder/bio.html
    
    for them as wants to see how much of their high-school latin they
    remember, there are latin versions of "jabberwocky" and the first few
    pages of a novel called "with the eagles" under my home page.
294.51WECARE::BOURGOINETue Feb 14 1995 16:318
    
>>    http://www.zk3.dec.com/~binder/bio.html


	Yeah, so , where's the picture??????   :-)


	Pat
294.52SMURF::BINDERvitam gustareTue Feb 14 1995 17:318
    > Yeah, so , where's the picture??????
    
    didja see a BIG hotspot, like maybe with my name?
    
    didja click on it?
    
    guess that wasn't clear.  i've added a thumbnail to the hotspot so it's
    easier to handle.
294.53POWDML::LAUERLC of Inexpressible RaptureTue Feb 14 1995 20:0710
    
    .37
    
    Well, so now I'm curious.  I've been wondering all day...since
    Mr.McGregor is so keen on pictures and sound within soapbox, what
    exactly does HE look like?
    
    We're waiting, Mr.McGregor.  We want full details, and not only that,
    don't leave anything out 8^).
    
294.54Just imagine...KAOA00::KAOU55::MCGREGORWed Feb 15 1995 10:465
Well you just met Glenn+.
I've been told that all Canucks look the same. So you must have a pretty
good idea. BTW I only have one personality that I'm aware of.

	Allan
294.55GAVEL::JANDROWbrain crampWed Feb 15 1995 10:495
    
    well, after having met both glenn+ and hatashita, i can tell you that
    not ALL canucks look the same...  :> :> :>
    
    
294.56POWDML::LAUERIntoxicatingly ConnectedWed Feb 15 1995 12:097
    
    .54
    
    Bzzzzzzzt.  Two minutes for avoiding the question!
    
    
    If you're shy, send me mail 8^).
294.57SX4GTO::OLSONDoug Olson, ISVETS Palo AltoWed Feb 15 1995 18:3510
    .15> may be easier for loners to avoid people now, hiding the fact even from
    > themselves that they're living through their keyboards; and given how
    > easy it is, maybe we'll see more of such types.  So everything has its
    > costs; the plugged-in social dropouts at least have more interaction,
    > less time alone-in-the-head, than did their predecessors; so I'm not as
    > worried about the net breeding a new set of mass murderers.
    
    Jake Baker (see topic 299) being a possible case in point.
    
    DougO
294.58No class structureKAOA00::KAOU55::MCGREGORThu Feb 16 1995 12:016
It also eliminates the class structure. I don't believe you can live
on the wrong side of a keyboard.

So the village already has a judge (Komar) is there a mayor and councillor's?

	Allan
294.59no apostrophePOWDML::LAUERIntoxicatingly ConnectedThu Feb 16 1995 12:571