[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference napalm::guitar

Title:GUITARnotes - Where Every Note has Emotion
Notice:Discussion of the finer stringed instruments
Moderator:KDX200::COOPER
Created:Thu Aug 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:3280
Total number of notes:61432

667.0. "What's a Les Paul Firebrand?" by VAXWRK::INGRAM (Larry Ingram) Tue Jun 07 1988 15:48

	Can anyone tell me what a Les Paul Firebrand is? I've heard of
	Custom, Deluxe, Standard, Studio, etc. but not Firebrand.

Thanks,

	Larry

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
667.1<< Just an inexpensive L.P. Standard >>SALEM::ABATELLISet/Mode=No_ThinkTue Jun 07 1988 15:577
    The Les Paul "Firebrand" is a cheaper version of the Les Paul Standard.
    Less expensive wood w/less expensive components. They were again
    trying to compete with Japanese (price wise). 
                                                   
    
    Have a GREAT day!
    Fred-who-loves-his-Les Paul Custom! 
667.2More infoDRUID::RANDERSONTue Jun 07 1988 17:2612
    The "Firebrand" designation is due to the fact that the Gibson
    logo was branded into the headstock rather than being an applied
    decal.  This series of guitars (they made Firebrand SG's and 335's
    also) were all solidbodies with natural finishes.  The Firebrand
    Les Pauls do not have a carved top as do the conventional Les Paul models.
    A friend of mine has a Firebrand SG which plays fairly well.  It
    came with high output Gibson "Dirty Fingers" pickups and really
    cranks.  I think it cost @ $400 new at a time when conventional
    SG's were priced @ $489.
    					Ron
    
    
667.3Firebrands, "The Paul" and "The SG"AQUA::ROSTLizard King or Bozo Dionysius?Tue Jun 07 1988 17:3318
    
    Just before they started making the "Firebrand" models, virtually
    identical Les Paul and SG guitars were sold as "The Paul" and "The
    SG".
    
    The wood in these guitars, BTW is walnut, so they sound considerably
    different than the mahogany-bodied Pauls/SGs.
    
    Another thing....these guitars all have the pickup selector mounted
    on the lower half of the body *below* the knobs, an odd location
    and different than other SGs (which have them *above* the knobs)
    and Pauls (they are on the upper half of the body).
    
    The 335 Firebrands also were odd in that they are *solid* and have
    a slightly samller body than a regular ES-335.
    
    
    
667.4re: The PaulVOLKS::RYENRick Ryen 285-6248Thu Jun 23 1988 20:0228
                    -<re: .3 "The Paul"  >-

    
	A friend of mine has a "The Paul" Firebrand, which is
	natural finish mahogony. I believe that its about a 
	1976 model, but I could be wrong. I have played it a few times
	like it more than any other Gibson I've tried, including some
	brand spanking new $2k models.

	The strings seemed to have a feel that I can only describe
	as 'bouncy'. By "bouncy" I mean that you get the best sound
	by really twanging them so they end up doing real wide
	swings.	    
    
	It definately gets that fat humbucker Gibson sound!

	The thing is a bit beat, but the scratches just seem to
	just add character to what looks like an oiled finish.
	(no varnish or poly, and probably not original)

	I (foolishly but seriously) offered him a grand for it,
	but he refused. Partly because he knew he would be ripping me
	off, but mostly because he doesn't want to part with it.

	Anyway, I'm still lookin for one of these, but think I'll be
	a bit more conservative in my offer when I find one.

	(and all this from a hardcore strat man!)