[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hydra::amiga_v1

Title:AMIGA NOTES
Notice:Join us in the *NEW* conference - HYDRA::AMIGA_V2
Moderator:HYDRA::MOORE
Created:Sat Apr 26 1986
Last Modified:Wed Feb 05 1992
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5378
Total number of notes:38326

3811.0. "Bridgeboard/Win 3.0" by ASDS::WARD () Wed May 30 1990 15:19

    Microsoft Windows Version 3.0 lists the Commodore PC 40-iii and the
    PC 60-iii as compatible. [something about a DECstation 350 too]
    
    Has anyone loaded this pkg. onto the bridgeboard? or called
    commodore?  The Dynabook(Hypercard-like) tool is nice and the
    AT @ 12 Mhz performance is tolerable.
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3811.1It should be working.MQOFS::LEDOUXReserved for Future UseFri Jun 01 1990 14:3712
    I forgot the version of Windows, but about 8 months ago,
    I used the version DEC uses and copied it to my XT bridgeboard.
    In CGA (normal PC to Amiga screen) it works, well... like
    you mentionned you definitely need an AT.  On my XT it takes
    about 45 sec just to get to the window screen.
    I just tried it for fun, then deleted it as it just take all
    the power off my XT.  I also don't have good application to play 
    with.  
    I assume that if it works with an bridgeboard XT, it must
    work with the AT version.
    
    Vince.
3811.2NAC::BRANNONvalue addedFri Jun 01 1990 18:287
    re .1:               
    MS-Windows 3.0 requires a 286, 386, or 486.  It supports CGA, but
    not XT's.  It performs reasonably well on a 386/20Mhz system with a
    VGA display.
    
    dennis
    
3811.3LEDS::ACCIARDILarger than life, and twice as uglyFri Jun 01 1990 19:117
    
    How does the Windows 3.0 redraw/refresh rate on a 20 MHz 386 compare to
    the Amiga's Smart Refresh window?  Say a stock 68K Amiga for example,
    running a 640 x 400 4 color WB, and comparing to a 640 x 480 VGA
    desktop (how many colors?)
    
    Ed.
3811.4NAC::BRANNONvalue addedFri Jun 01 1990 19:5220
    re .3:
    
    I don't normally run with a 640x400 4 color WB since I find interlace
    annoying.  The redraw/refresh is noticibly faster on a 4 color
    640x200 WB screen, but keep in mind the MS-Windows 3.0 VGA desktop
    is 640x480 in 16 colors.  So its an apples and oranges comparison until
    the Amiga has a supported 16 color WB for the 500/1000/2000.
                                 
    There's an OS/2 program to convert 16 color GIF pictures to the BMP
    files that MS-Windows and OS/2 Presentation Manager use for a
    16 color background. 
    
    This is the competition, folks, I hope CBM realizes it in time.
    
    For people that don't look beyond what's on the screen, and there are
    alot of them out there, 4 colors as the default is no longer enough.
    
    regards,
    dennis (who still prefers his Amiga)