| I bought this lisp in 1986 when it was called Amiga Lisp. I found it
to be unusable. I couldn't get it to load in a file. Also, it's not Common
Lisp. I was willing to learn "Cambridge Standard Lisp" but I could not find
a reference on it. It may be a dead language.
I truly hope that this product has been improved. I'd love to have an almost
decent lisp for the Amiga.
Let us know how you like it. If you ever need help complaining to Metacomco,
I'll help you.
You and I may be the only people in this conference to have tried this Lisp.
If not, let's hear from some other people!
I have used Amiga XLISP 1.7 many times. It's a subset of common Lisp and
I had a lot of success with it. I wrote a few games and did some of my
discrete math class assignments with it. It worked great. Dave Tenny, of
the VAX LISP group tried to do something more complicated and said XLISP
couldn't handle it.
Now XLISP v2.0 is out. I think it has a system access function, I'm don't
know the list of improvements. It's available on this network.
Best wishes.
Paul Wisner
AI Tools developer, VAX LISP user
|
| Hello,
First, thanks for the answers, second here is my Cambridge Lisp story:
I bought it last year's summer (my brain too hot maybe) because of a good
price (the USA price as here prices are the double) and some real interest.
Globally I like its features as I'm not experienced with Lisp.
Compiler and Lisp control seem fine and mainframe origin is evident.
I have used their recommended system interface and via a little written "shell"
function I can execute MEmacs to edit the Lisp programs and then go back to
Lisp control.
But system interface works aparently only with a limited number of parameters
(I think 3 A and 3 D 68000 registers).
Also if I need a big space for Lisp it takes only 540K (not 530K as I've said
before) and this I don't like at all. I've called Metacomco (in GB) for it but
they told that it is no more developed...and no answer for the 540k limitation.
I asked also for some graphics and/or Amiga interface and the answer was that
it exists maybe for ... XLISP !
The documentation is good for reference but not to learn and it's limited.
There are many functions but little explaining.
Finally I have the sensation that it's a "should have been a good one" Lisp
and I'm still using it just to play some Lisp.
Maybe in the future I'll switch to some Forth system with a good Amiga
connection.
Best regards, Sorin
|