[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hydra::amiga_v1

Title:AMIGA NOTES
Notice:Join us in the *NEW* conference - HYDRA::AMIGA_V2
Moderator:HYDRA::MOORE
Created:Sat Apr 26 1986
Last Modified:Wed Feb 05 1992
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5378
Total number of notes:38326

875.0. "De-interlacer rumors..." by LEDS::ACCIARDI () Thu Nov 05 1987 14:12

    A fellow on PLINK has seen a de-interlacer board for all three Amiga
    models.  This is not a cheap add-on; the model for the A2000 is
    around $600, the A500 and A1000 models will be priced around $400.
    
    The A2000 de-interlacer will work on all modes, including HAM. 
    The lower cost version will only work on 640 x 400 x 16 colors and
    320 x 400 x 32 colors.  HAM mode flicker usually isn't noticable,
    since the smooth blending of colors eliminates sharp contrast between
    adjacent scan lines.
    
    There is a catch though; all models will require the use of a multiscan
    type monitor, such as the Sony 1302 or the NEC MultiSync.  With
    the added monitor cost, non-interlaced hi-res will cost you around
    a thousand bucks... uggghh!!
    
    I'll post any more info I can gather in this note.  
    
    Anyone hear any more on Commodore's long persistance monitor?
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
875.1Overscan any problem?MEMORY::BERKSONWhat's that in the road - a head?Thu Nov 05 1987 15:364
    More info if you can get it: Will the de-interlacer have any problem
    in overscan mode?
    
       mitch
875.2LEDS::ACCIARDIThu Nov 05 1987 17:3713
    re: overscan support...
    
    I'm not sure if it supports it or not, but I'll try to find out.
    I am puzzled though; I'd assume you'd want full overscan for recording
    a full screen to a VCR.  In this case, you'd want to use interlace
    to be compatible with NTSC.
    
    Actually, I don't think it's possible to change the display parameters
    on a single scan line, other than color.  In other words, you can't
    go from hi res to lo res or change interlace on a single line. 
    
    Ed.
    
875.3MEMORY::BERKSONWhat's that in the road - a head?Thu Nov 05 1987 19:029
    I may be far afield on this. Aren't there some programs - especially
    games that use overscan?
    
    It seems like it would be a major pain for the card to support it
    since if it supported up to 640x400, the frame fits within 256K.
    But if it supports overscan it would need a significant amount more
    hardware.
    
       mitch
875.4Dynamic Resolution SwitchingTLE::RMEYERSRandy MeyersMon Nov 09 1987 09:0615
Re: .2

>    Actually, I don't think it's possible to change the display parameters
>    on a single scan line, other than color.  In other words, you can't
>    go from hi res to lo res or change interlace on a single line. 

Sure you can.  The Copper can change the horizontal and vertical resolution
on every scan line.  Haven't you ever pulled down a Deluxe Paint low res
screen to see the medium res workbench screen underneath?  For that to
work, the Copper has to support switching from 640 wide to 320 wide res
on the fly.  It is true that putting any interlace screen on the physical
display will cause the entire physical display to go into interlace.  But,
even in this mode the copper is displaying non-interlace screens in their
normal 200 line high resolution by displaying each non-interlaced scan
line twice.
875.5...LEDS::ACCIARDIMon Nov 09 1987 11:2620
    Sure, I knew that... what I meant was that a given screen may have only
    one resolution at a time.  You couldn't have a screen with a hi-res window
    right next to a lo-res window on the same screen.
    
    In answer to the original question, I've seen a brochure at the
    Software Shop for the de-interlacer.  It claims a resolution of
    670 x 444 or something like that, which I believe are the overscan
    dimensions.

    While at the Software Shop, Moe gave me a quick dump on Comdex,
    which he visited.  He saw an A2000 running Professional Page on
    a large mono monitor with the de-interlacer installed.  He claimed
    the display was incredible, as good as any of the Mac large displays.
    
    These new toys are a good thing, but clearly out of the price range
    of the average home user.  Maybe some clever hacker will come out
    with a lower priced de-interlacer for us poor A1000 owners...
    
    Ed.