[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_91

Title:CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid
Notice:This file has been archived. New notes to CAM3::SPORTS.
Moderator:CAM3::WAY
Created:Fri Dec 21 1990
Last Modified:Mon Nov 01 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:290
Total number of notes:84103

40.0. "The Raiders-'90 AFC West Champs" by ELMAGO::CGRIEGO (Trust Jesus ) Thu Jan 03 1991 18:11

    This topic is dedicated to the 1990 AFC West Champions, the Los
    Angeles Raiders. Anything that pertains to anything pertaining to
    the Raiders can be entered here.
    
    Carlos
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
40.1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Thu Jan 03 1991 18:194
    The Raiders waived Ricky Hunley LB, a former #1 draft pick of the
    Bengals, and signed Darin Jordan LB.
    
    Carlos
40.2Go Raiders, beat the 49ers !!ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: SPORTS' objective analystThu Jan 03 1991 18:3214
    The Raiders have improved during the season perhaps more than 
    any other squad.  Schroeder's progress is the most obvious, but
    that OL has become positively scary.  Not to mention the defense,
    which is hitting like the Raiders' D from the days of yore.
    
    As a_AFC fan I been thinking about who has the best shot against
    the 49ers (whom I've grown to loathe) in the Super Bowl and I've
    concluded that it's got to be the Raiders.  
    
    They have Marcus, Howie, Bo, that scary OL...  Gene Upshaw has 
    done a fine job of handling this team, and they get my vote for the
    AFC Title.
    
    MrT
40.3What's he done latelyHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe elbow is part of the ballThu Jan 03 1991 19:0212
    >The Raiders have improved during the season perhaps more than 
    >any other squad.  Schroeder's progress is the most obvious, but
    >that OL has become positively scary.
    
    I think Schroeder's regressing actually.  He was surprisingly decent,
    even {gulp} good going into the middle of the season, but since week 10
    or so it's back to the same old bonehead of a QB.  He's had a number of
    awful games lately.
    
    I think if the AFC has a hope in the Super Bowl, it's in Buffalo.
    
    Dan
40.4ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Thu Jan 03 1991 19:146
    >Gene Upshaw has done a fine job of handling this team,...
    
    Upshaw??? Don't you mean Art Shell?
    
    Homeboy
    
40.5CSC32::SALZERFri Jan 04 1991 00:437
    Hunley was drafted by Cinci but never signed. Denver picked him up
    in some deal which I forget the details. He played well but never became
    the big play maker everyone had hoped. During the last strike he 
    was very active and vocal on the players' issues. Management
    basically dumped him to the Cardinals then on to LA. 
    
    BoB 
40.6Progressing Not Regressing!!!!!!!!!!!!DECXPS::KHARRISFri Jan 04 1991 15:398
    Throughout the month of December, with the exception of the Chargers
    game, Schroeder was awesome. He threw for 4 TD's against Minnesota and
    I believe it was 10 for the month. Not bad for a team that runs the
    ball as much as the Raiders. So I would have to disagree with your
    statement that he is regressing since midseason.
    
    
                                      Kenn
40.7Schroeder's Raiders, tearing it up....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Fri Jan 04 1991 20:5413
    Kennnn :-), I'm forced to agree with you, of all the QB's still in the
    hunt Schroeder is definitely one of the ones that is playing solidly
    right now. Also included in that list (IMHO) would be Cunningham,
    Rypien, and Marino. Those that are playing good, but questionable,
    from game to game are Young, Montana, DeBerg, and Boomer. Cody Carlson 
    had a great day for the Oilers last week, but it coulda been a fluke, 
    jury is still out on him. Hurting at QB, (IMHO) are the Bills, Chicago,
    the Saints, and the Giants. The Oilers, Bills, 49'ers, Bears, and
    Giants are all playing their second string QB's, and while these
    QB's are all very capable of winning big games, they are also all
    capable of choking in the big games. 
    
    Homeboy 
40.8Bring on the BengalsDECXPS::KHARRISMon Jan 07 1991 10:446
    The Raiders get Cinnci again for the 2nd time in a month. I think we'll
    see a steady diet of Bo and Marcus all day until Cinnci proves they can
    stop the run. I see an outcome just like the first game, especially if
    James Brooks is unable to go next week for Cinnci. 
    
                                     Kenn
40.9ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Jan 07 1991 17:3914
40.10The brain is the questionable organHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe elbow is part of the ballMon Jan 07 1991 17:588
    re:.7.
    
    Let's see.  Schroeder's playing solid in your ratings, and Montana's
    questionable.  Very interesting.
    
    Schroeder's a bum.  It'll show in these playoffs.
    
    Dan
40.11FSOA::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Mon Jan 07 1991 19:175
    Dan, there is no reasonong with these Raider fans, their players always 
    are in the best in their eyes.  They sure got a lot of tough competition 
    in the AFC West this year. :):)
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
40.12Raiders vs 49'ers Superbowl XXVOURGNG::RIGGENAir Force, CSU, CU... Denver Bronco'sMon Jan 07 1991 19:543
The Raider got real lucky with Miami beating the Kansas City Chiefs. Had the 
Chiefs won the Raiders season would end at the AFC championship game. 

40.138^)ECAMV3::JACOBAh Sh!t, Gotta wait til nexted yearMon Jan 07 1991 20:2314
>><<< Note 40.11 by FSOA::JRODOPOULOS "Hey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?" >>>
>>
>>    Dan, there is no reasonong with these Raider fans, their players always 
>>    are in the best in their eyes.  They sure got a lot of tough competition 
>>    in the AFC West this year. :):)
    
>>    John "D Cowboys" R.

    Sort of reminds me of a certain Brown(spot)s(tm) fan we had in here
    till the 'spots started losing!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
    
40.14FSOA::JRODOPOULOSHey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?Mon Jan 07 1991 20:279
    re: -1
    
    My note was supposed to be sarcastic, I'm sorry if did not come across
    that way, and please don't ever acuse me of being a Cleveland Brown
    fan.  I have standards........
    
    BTW could you explain your note ?
    
    John " D Cowboys" R.
40.15ClarificationECAMV3::JACOBAh Sh!t, Gotta wait til nexted yearMon Jan 07 1991 20:3110
    re-.1
    
    I was speaking of the Raider fans, not you.   I wouldnt' accuse anyone
    of sound mind of being a 'Spots fan, or for that matter, of an unsound
    mind either.
    
    Sorry you misunderstood the note!!!
    
    JaKe
    
40.16ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Mon Jan 07 1991 21:2736
        

>><<< Note 40.11 by FSOA::JRODOPOULOS "Hey Mon, How Many Jobs You Got Today ?" >>>
>>
>>    Dan, there is no reasonong with these Raider fans, their players always 
>>    are in the best in their eyes. 
    
    It'd kinda dumb if in the Raider fans' eyes, the cowboys had the
    best players now wouldn't it?  
    
 >>    They sure got a lot of tough competition 
 >>    in the AFC West this year. :):) 
    >>    John "D Cowboys" R.

    When your on top of your division, like the Raiders or the Giants,
    then naturally other teams within your division are gonna look weak
    like the Donks or the Cowboys. But if your on the bottom, like the
    Donks or the Cowboys, then your teams schedule looks tougher, 'cause
    you gotta play teams like the Raiders or the Giants. It just all
    depends on your perspective. :-)
    
   > Sort of reminds me of a certain Brown(spot)s(tm) fan we had in here
   > till the 'spots started losing!!!!
    > JaKe
    
    Hey JaKe, in your intro note it says that you like the Raiders,
    so could this mean that you remind yourself of a certain Brown (spot)s
    (tm) fan?
    
    As far as Schroeder -vs- Montana goes, there is NO comparison. Montana
    is one of the all time greats. It's just that he's playing hurt
    right now, and Schroeder isn't. I do, however, think that if both
    these teams make it to the big game they will have comparable stats.
    Which would be more a reflection on the pass defenses than the QBs.
    
    Carlos
40.17I beg to differ, CarlosECAMV3::JACOBAh Sh!t, Gotta wait til nexted yearTue Jan 08 1991 01:0329
           <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 2.38                       Introduction Note                       38 of 78
CELTIK::JACOB "STEELERS=1990 AFC Central Champs"     13 lines   2-JAN-1991 22:22
                             -< JaKe hath Arrived >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>    Rich Jacob, aka JaKe
>>    Customer Service Engineer
>>    Pittsburgh, Pa.
    
>>    Likes:  Steelers, Pirates, Penguins, Pitt, Penn State, And Whoever is
                                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>    playing the Mets, Raiders, Oilers, Brown(spot)s(tm), or Bengals.
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Carlos:
    As seen above I definitely don't say I like the Raiders.  I also don't
    like the Bung(ho)les(tm), so I guess the only thing I can root for in
    the game this weekend is for the buttons to snap on one of the
    Raiderettes uniforms while on national TV.
    
    I remember the slugfests the Steelers and Raiders had in the '70's all
    too well and nothing short of an act of God Himself could sway my
    disdain for the Sliver and Blechhhh...
    
    JaKe
    
     
40.18Bills are tough, Schroeder is average.KEPNUT::DIGGINSTue Jan 08 1991 11:027
    
    Raider fans are making a serious mistake if they are counting out
    Buffalo. Oh ya, and I agree with Dan, Shroeder is a stiff.
    
    
    
    Steve
40.19Raiders Rule!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Tue Jan 08 1991 12:4810
    Oooops!, Sorry JaKe, guess I mis-read it.
    
    Steve, the Raiders had Buffalo scared to death last time they played.
    It was just one of those fluke victories they lucked out on, where
    they was gettin their butts kicked throughout the game, and then
    all of a sudden (like two minutes) they luck out and score 21
    or so unanswered points. It won't happen again though, besides they'll
    be lucky to get by the Dolphins again. :-)
    
    Carlos
40.20ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Wed Jan 09 1991 12:4912
    In yesterdays USA Today, they had the results of their best and
    worst polls of the year, and the Raiders uniforms were selected 
    as the best liked, while the Browns had the worst liked uniforms.
    
    Also, Al Davis was among the worst liked owners. Imagine that....
    
    Jimmy Johnson of the Cowboys, was selected Coach of the Year by
    the The Associated Press. He edged Art Shell of the Raiders by 2.5
    votes. ......incredible how a coach with a losing record can be
    selected over coaches with winning records.
    
    Carlos
40.21CAM::WAYMoe knows pies in the faceWed Jan 09 1991 12:5217
>    votes. ......incredible how a coach with a losing record can be
>    selected over coaches with winning records.

Not so incredible Carlos.

I mean, I'm no fan of Jimmy Johnson, or the 'boys, but I've got to
hand it to him, in one season he took the 'boys from 1-15 to 
7-9, missing the playoffs by a hair's breadth.

Shell is a great coach, but this year, I think the coaching "miracle"
was Johnson.

Similarly, if MacPherson can do the same with the Pats, look for him
to cop the honors next year.....

'Saw

40.22LAGUNA::MAY_BRMaster of the UniverseWed Jan 09 1991 13:1414
    Yeah, but 'saw Johnson was the one who coached them to the 1-15 season. 
    What if the Broncos went 9-7 next year, should Reeves get coach of the
    year?
    
    Another thing, does Texas have some sort of affection for people who
    dress 20 years behind the times or something?  They had Landry with the
    stupid hat, Glanville who wore enough polyester clothes (with a white
    belt no less!) that he looks like he belongs out here in Sun City
    playing golf with all the dried up Meachamites, and now JJ with a
    haircut that would make Rueben Kincaid of the Partridge Family proud. 
    Is all of Texas really that void of class?  
    
    Bruce (who's scheduled to go to Dallas next week and is wondering
    whether he should pack a leisure suit or not)
40.23ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus Wed Jan 09 1991 13:3710
    'Saw, I agree that JJ's doing a great job of turning that team around
    and had the 'boys made the playoffs it (CotY) could be justified.
    The thing is, that the 'boys still ain't there, and there are other
    coaches who have also turned their teams around but are there. I
    just don't think we should reward mediocrity.
    
    Bruce, thanks for the laughs on the Texas coaches, especially the
    Ruben Kincaid one.....haaaaha... :-)
    
    Carlos 
40.24Jimmy Johnson == Ruben Kincaid's Love Child?CAM::WAYMoe knows pies in the faceWed Jan 09 1991 13:4619
Bruce --

You'll have a REALLY fun time in Dallas.  When I used to work for
American Airlines I had ocassion to go there twice.  I forget what
hotel we stayed in but it was supremely elegant (even had phones
in the bathroom).  The waitresses in the lounge were extraordinary,
each one looking like she stepped straight out of a centerfold.

At 4am the city was still jumping.  I was there for three days one
time and had all of about two hours sleep.

Enjoy dude.  Bring your cowboy boots. 8^)


Carlos --
Good point.  


'Saw
40.25they might have beaten Philly tooCHIEFF::CHILDSI could use a dramatic sting hereWed Jan 09 1991 14:168
 Well Cowboys did have an easier schedule. Had Aikman not been hurt Boys
 probably would have made the playoffs. Shell inherited a load of talent.
 JJ tore the team apart and rebuilt it. For that I give him the node over
 Shell. Just as long as that cheatin good for nothing Wchye doesn't win
 it I'm happy...

 mike
40.26CHIEFF::MACNEALPapa MacWed Jan 09 1991 14:467
40.27Gud jub Jimmy Ray Bob Bill.CUBIC7::DIGGINSThu Jan 10 1991 11:078
    
    Jimmy Johnson was an excellent choice as COTY. I have to admit I
    really don't care for the guy but he has turned around that team.
    It helps when your best friends with the owner!
    
    
    
    Steve
40.28BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Jan 10 1991 12:083
    The Raiders are my favorite team!  Go Raiders!
    
    lEe
40.29RAIDERS 20 BENGALS 10GSMOKE::LSUSTAITAMon Jan 14 1991 11:051
    RAIDERS win on to BUFFALO!!!!!!!!!!!
40.30Par Excellence!RDOVAX::BRAKERich Brake in VirginiaMon Jan 14 1991 12:375
    You take Barry Sanders, Thurman Thomas and Neil Anderson. Give me
    Marcus Allen - the guy is simply the best back in football.
    
    Rich
    
40.32Let's get back to reality.BSS::JCOTANCHCU: 1990 Big 8 &amp; National ChampionsMon Jan 14 1991 15:171
    The Faiders will not win in Buffalo.  The Bills will no be denied.
40.33Hoping for a warm weather win for the raiders...VLNVAX::MBROOKSMon Jan 14 1991 15:439
    This is going to be the best game of the playoffs so far....Buffalo is
    a very strong team especially at home, unbeaten there this season and
    strong at all aspects of the game.......Hopeing for nice weather next
    week I think another snow/ice/freezing rain game would go to buffalo a
    warm weather game will keep it even.  Both teams have a strong running
    game but buffalo will gain the advantage in bad weather...Will be a
    close one with bo breaking lose for a big yardage td in the 4rth and
    the raiders squeak it out...Im hoping for a LA VS NY Superbowl.....
    								MAB
40.35Should Be FunDASXPS::KHARRISMon Jan 14 1991 16:3211
    Jay Schroeder had a solid game at QB yesterday and made two key passes
    in guiding the Raiders to a win. Everyone rips the guy when he has a
    bad day, however when he has a good day no one gives him credit. Greg
    Townesend was awesome. Riki Ellison was burnt repeatedly on the same
    running play over and over again. Where is Aarron Wallace???? Willie
    Gault was non-existent all day. Snow is not a good sign for the Raiders
    next week, however like Schroeder said "we have the talent to play with
    anybody". This should be the best game of the year!!!!
    
                                     Kenn
    
40.36Buffalo by 2COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jan 16 1991 17:479
      Yeh Shroeder had a good game, but you better credit the o-line for
    that, 'cause everyone knows that Shroeder chokes under pressure.
    
      This should be a good match up, with the edge to the Bills.  The last
    turnover will decide the game IMO.
    
      Marcus is as good as his line blocking.
    
    	T-bone
40.37DECWET::METZGERWhy the rush for war ?Wed Jan 16 1991 19:1711
I was just thinking on what HOOT and Monty would be saying right now. :-)

You Donc fans should be happy that they took the buyout. If they hadn't we
would never had heard the end of how the mighty RAIDERS (why are they always
capatalized?) are back.

I miss them......


  Metz
40.38Bruce Smith to body-slam Schroeder-don't miss it!BSS::JCOTANCHCU: 1990 Big 8 &amp; National ChampionsWed Jan 16 1991 20:287
> I was just thinking on what HOOT and Monty would be saying right now. :-)

    I'd like to see what they'd be saying after the Bills put a good old
    fashioned whippin' on the Raiders this Sunday.
    
    Joe
40.39COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jan 16 1991 22:044
      Hoot and Monty always said the faiders were mighty, even when they
    were 5-11 or something like that....
    
    		T-bone
40.40Hope Bo playsNEST::PAPIAThu Jan 17 1991 12:448
    
    	Ellison led the team in tackles against Cincy with 
    ten so he more than made up for the ones he missed.
    The Raiders will activate Greg Bell for the Buffalo
    game.
    
    
    Vinny
40.41A NO SHOW FOR THE BO SHOW = Buffalo WIn ???VLNVAX::MBROOKSThu Jan 17 1991 12:478
    accourding to todays National BO will not play sunday against the Bills
    this is a big break for the Bills and will in no doubt change the out
    come of the game....The Raiders still have high hope because they were
    also quoted as saying We wish there were 2 weeks before the superbowl
    wed like bo to be ready to play then !!!!  Still anyones game but the
    odds just went in Buffalos favor...I wonder how much this will effect
    the Odds in vegas's eyes ...???
    								MaB
40.42QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Thu Jan 17 1991 15:0712
40.43I Don't AgreeDECXPS::KHARRISFri Jan 18 1991 19:2214
    For 2 teams that seem evenly matched, a 7 point line seems pretty
    unrealistic at this point I wouldn't think that it would increase.
    Schroeder is a stiff and he always chokes?????? Is that why he was
    named the AFC's offensive player of the month for December, which are
    the most important games of the year when you have a chance to win your
    division. The comment made earlier about Marcus Allen is REDICULOUS!!!!
    The 3rd down run he had at the end of the game proves that. All backs
    do better with a good offensive line. I think it's going to be a great
    game, and I'm looking forward to watching it.
    
    
    
    
                                      Kenn
40.44SMOKED!!DASXPS::KHARRISMon Jan 21 1991 11:5314
    So much for it being a great game, they got SMOKED!!! The defense
    played as poorly as the Bills offense played well. Once again the LB's
    were nowhere to be found. Lionell Washington got burned all day by
    Lofton. Is there ever gonna be a time when the Raiders can stop the run
    out of a shotgun formation???????? Schroeder did not play well which
    I'm sur I'll catch alot of grief for considering I've backed him all
    year. However when the defense knows that you've got to pass your kind
    of in a hopeless situation. Terry McDaniel may have been the only
    bright spot for the Raiders.
    
             I was highly impressed with Buffalo and feel they will have no
    problem with the Giants. 
    
                                  Kenn
40.45QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Jan 21 1991 17:5723
Well, well, well, he said, stroking his jutting jawline.

51-3, hey?

Far be it from me to laugh at any RAIDERETTES (tm), or retaliate for all
the comments made when the Broncos got blown out in the Superbowel.

I should probably mention, though, that on the list of ALL-TIME POST
SEASON PLAYOFF BLOWOUTS,  The Faiders (tm) have now moved into 3rd
place.

Washington is 1st... losing by 73 points in 1940
Houston is 2nd...... Losing by 49 points in 1969
Raiders are 3rd..... losing by 48 points in 1991

Broncos are in sixth place.

[ In spite of the razzing, if it had been Raiders and 49'ers in the
Superbowl, I'd have been screaming my guts out for the Raiders and the
AFC West. ]

Tough Luck guys
Mike JN
40.46Grab the puffs!!!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jan 21 1991 20:2121
      Where are all the faider faithfuls today?  There has been only 1
    faider fan in here.  Carlos,  are ya on vacation??
    
      I got to watch most of this game, and boy did I enjoy it!!!  41-3 at
    halftime.
    
      I thought the Broncos choked in the big one, but the faiders got
    smart and choked early.
    
      Alot of people are saying that Bo would have made a difference.  Not
    this time.  Shroeder had a classic game, and the defense didn't know
    who to turn around and point to.  Maybe Howie won't be soooo cocky next
    time, but then again, he is a faider.
    
      I will say that I know how youze faider fans feel getting blown out,
    but Kay sir awe sir awe......
    
    
      Better be ready next year, 'cause the Broncos will be back!!!
    
    		T-bone
40.47Not quite, HowieSHALOT::HUNTSquare Dancing :== Country RapMon Jan 21 1991 20:319
    I thought Howie Long had a *great* pre-game quote ...
    
    "We're going to win this thing and then represent the AFC in the Super
    Bowl like it should have been these last few years."
    
    Oooo, looks like that'll be taped to the Broncos' locker room walls
    next season.
    
    Bob Hunt
40.48Bring one home to the AFC for a change...KIDVAX::MBROOKSTue Jan 22 1991 11:0723
    You cant compare the raiders to the donks...Plesae.  THe broncos have
    lost how many superbowls and if thats not enough they still have the
    #1 record for worst, THATS WORST superblow ever.  Translation they
    were lucky to be there.  And if you dont think BO being out made a
    difference you blink and proberbly dont understand the Riaders OFFense
    at all.  Im not a die hard raider black and silver blood running
    american but they were the #2 team in the AFC and id put them at about
    #5 in the league right now.  BO accounted for about 25%-33% of the
    plays on a normal day (Not so much as carrying the ball but blocking
    and making the defense cover him double, triple whatever)  Take that
    away from a team and your in troble...Look at it this way if Shroader
    had thrown 1/2 the amount of passes then for the sake of argument well
    say he would have only thron 2-3 interceptions.  With the running game
    hurting fron the opening kickoff and then falling behind the game was
    over.  Bo is a big part of the raiders team and he made a huge
    difference, with a helthy bo the Bills may have still one but not by
    more than 10.......In comparising to the broncos they lost by 45 points
    in a superbowl and I dont remember one of the Best Offensive stars
    being out.  And please dont insult me bying saying that the broncos
    had a lineman with a hangnail and thats why SF scored 55pts.  The
    raiders are a much better team than anyone gives them credit for and
    the broncos are a overhyped team of the past.
    							GO BIlls (AFC)
40.49A half-season of 10 carries a game and then out ain't enough...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 22 1991 11:5716
    I read some reports that more than a few unnamed Raiders and Al Davis
    himself aren't too happy with Mr. Jackson right now.  They didn't like
    the way he lost interest in the Bengal game after he got hurt (instead
    staying in the background playing with his kids), and apparently, as
    has been the case in his baseball venture, they question his
    dedication to the team as opposed to his own career.
    
    I think the complaints are legitimate.  If the upshot of this two-sport
    experiment is going to be frequent injury and distracted attention 
    resulting in large chunks of missed playing time in *both* sports, then 
    Bo becomes a sometimes wonderful, sometimes spectacular curiosity, but 
    one I'd probably rather see on someone else's team.
    
    glenn
    
40.50FDCV06::KINGWhen all else fails,HIT the teddybearTue Jan 22 1991 12:435
    You heard it here first.. Print this reply out and post it
    in your office... The Raiders will draft the USC QB (forgot his name)
    who just got caught with coke....
    
    
40.51Marinovich bustedSHALOT::MEDVIDthe plans for a future warTue Jan 22 1991 13:4316
    WOA!  You mean clean Todd "never eat red meat" Marinovich?
    
    Yes, here it is right in the paper...arrested for investigation of
    possession of cocain Sunday...also was carrying grass.
    
    But if he's a coke user, doesn't the NFL have a right to keep him out
    of the draft?
    
    Also, his dad must be crushed.  Couldn't have happened to a better
    father.  This kid was fed football from the day he was
    born...literally...had a football in the nursery.  Todd was deprived of
    a normal childhood for the sake of his father's glory.  Two years away
    from home and look what happens.  This is sad, but for some reason I'm
    kind of glad it happened.  Strange how my mind works sometime.
    
    	--dan'l
40.52CAM::WAYWho more than self, their country lovedTue Jan 22 1991 13:547
Nope, from what I've seen of his (looney) Dad, he must be ripshit!

I really feel sorry for that kid.  Someone of lesser strength, (or more
depending on how you look at it) probably would have blown his old man
away......

'Saw
40.53BSS::JCOTANCHBills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3Tue Jan 22 1991 14:0617
>    THe broncos have
>    lost how many superbowls and if thats not enough they still have the
>    #1 record for worst, THATS WORST superblow ever.  Translation they
>    were lucky to be there.  

    So if you think the Broncos were lucky to get that far, you're also
    saying the Faiders were lucky to get as far as they did.  
    
>    Bo is a big part of the raiders team and he made a huge
>    difference, with a helthy bo the Bills may have still one but not by
>    more than 10......

    HA HA!!!  That's a good one!
    
    
    Joe
    
40.54I Know football and that home run was great...VLNVAX::MBROOKSTue Jan 22 1991 14:1712
    SO I guess thurman thomas is a not needed piece of buffalos picture.
    Bo may not have reached 1000yrds like thomas but he also plays less
    games and splits the time with another running back, thats marcus
    alled seeing that you are obviously not familiar with the raiders
    team or there offensive structure.  Bo averages 5+yrds per carry,
    what does thomas average ??? Im sure bo is a better back than thomas
    so if you dont agree that being boless made a difference you must not
    feel very highly about thomas, I guess hes a waste of money for the
    bills huh.....I can understand raider bashing and even bo bashing but
    please show me that you have some understanding of the game in at least
    some of your entries.....(last reply to pure bashing factless entries)
    									MaB
40.55ToddNEMAIL::LEARYMTue Jan 22 1991 14:2810
    Sad tale of Todd Marinovich. When I read that story about him and his
    Dad, I kinda thought he was a ticking time bomb. I hope the kid gets
    some help and straightens out. He's young and can rebound
    
    MikeL
    
    PS: In a sick comment on this story, some wiseguy said the when his
    Dad found out he was caught with coke, he exploded " I told him to
    drink apple juice."  Sorry.
    
40.56'Bills by 11 over jintsCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Jan 22 1991 18:0930
    MAb...Are you saying the faiders are nothing without Bo?  It seems they
    won quite a few games without him.  He is a strong Rb, but he ani't
    gods gift.
    
      There is also no foundation to your statement that the Bills would
    have only won by 10 points if Bo was in the game.  He isn't a defensive
    player. Nor would he have taken 38 points away from the Bills.  Also,
    alot of hype last week was around how much Allen would have picked up
    the slack for Bo's absense.  There was Greg Bell in the game, who just
    happened to be a good Rb for the Rams.
    
      Bottom line is that the faider defense could'nt do squat, nor could
    Jay!
    
      The faiders had their best year in a longgggg time, so be happy with
    that.
    
      As to the donk-faider comparison, that was just to show a point
    differential of last years SB against this years AFC championship game. 
    That was done after all the bashing the Broncos took after their
    thrashing by the 9'rs.   Fair play ya know??
    
      If you want to talk faider dominance over the Broncos this year, well
    sure they beat them both times, but only by a total of 8 points in 2
    games.  No dominating factor there.
    
      Sooooo 'til next year......
    
    
    		T-bone
40.57Long game to watch for a LA fanNEST::PAPIAWed Jan 23 1991 11:2613
    
    	BO would have made a difference if he was healthy and could
    have run against the Bills defense, a teams running game is the
    key to open up alot of things like the passing game, it also
    would have keep the Bills offense off the field. Too many what
    ifs, the Bills won and thats it.
    
    	About the Raiders getting killed, they won some big games
    and lost some, the bottom line is they look like their on the
    upswing.
    
    
    Vinny
40.58.SALEM::DODASchroeder's SCUD's are always interceptedWed Jan 23 1991 12:090
40.59enough saidKIDVAX::MBROOKSWed Jan 23 1991 14:0514
    Your right I cant say they would have only won by 10, but common sense
    would say if a QB throws less he apt to be intercepted less.  They LA
    tried to come out and pass, they had to because they couldnt count on
    the running game as much as they previously could with bo...........
    This is  really easy to understand....Its hard to make a good
    comparison because Buffalo has a very strong backup QB so there passing
    game is always intact but if thomas was injured it would severly hurt
    there running game.  LA relies more on the run, where buffalo relies
    on there pass, BO is a big part of there run game period...Oh well its
    quite obvious that you have bad feelings toward the raiders and
    proberbly some raider fans that use to be in this note, this is why
    your blinding with bashing.....Oh well, buffalo is a great team and
    Im pulling for them to win the SB but there not a 48pt favorite over
    the raiders, things go your way, things really go your way...
40.60OURGNG::RIGGENAir Force, CSU, CU... Denver Bronco'sWed Jan 23 1991 19:448
Hoot called me again and said 


What really happen was Uncle Al's plan was forced down in Denver and the 
Players were asked to get off the plane. Then Pat Blow'in got on board with 
his team and all the Donkey's. Pat told them they were going to the SHOW. 
Resulting in the 51-3 blowout. 
 
40.61Young man who needs peace and patienceDECWIN::SCHNEIDERI JUST WANT TO SHOUT!Wed Jan 23 1991 20:5624
    No, one running back getting his 10 or so carries would have done
    nothing to avert this big time blowout.  
    
    Re: Marinovich.  Frank mentioned blowing his father away...  I think
    that's harsh, and certainly a morbid thought, but it made me make a
    connection.  SI had a piece on Marinovich this year, among other
    things, showing that he liked to paint (as in on canvas, not houses). 
    I'm suddenly reminded of Dead Poet's Society, in which the young man,
    driven to be a doctor wants to explore acting.  His father squashes the
    attempt, humiliating him and the ending is tragic.
    
    Not that I would think for a second that such could happen.  I hope
    for Marinovich's sake, and USC's that he stays in school.  He's
    suspended from spring practice this year (nothing to do with the recent
    bust, at least not directly).  He needs an attitude adjustment, and I'd
    guess an overdue period of "finding himself" before he's ready for
    football again.  If he takes school seriously (something I don't think
    he was doing) adjusts and find, he could come back next September and
    deserve all the Heisman hype as a junior.  
    
    I think applying for the NFL draft now would be the worst move he could
    make, both personally and professionally.
    
    Dan
40.62NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 24 1991 11:567
    
    I thought Marinovich didn't even register for classes this spring.
    If he's not even in school, he's gone.  Maybe not to the pros, but at
    least to another school (he'd have to sit out a year, right?).
    
    glenn
    
40.63Wait and seeDECWIN::SCHNEIDERI JUST WANNA SHOUT!Thu Jan 24 1991 15:4510
    >If he's not even in school, he's gone.  Maybe not to the pros, but at
    >least to another school (he'd have to sit out a year, right?).
    
    Yeah, but he red-shirted his freshman year.  I don't think it would
    make much sense, in football terms or in personal terms, to sit out
    another year, play the '92 season at another school and then enter the
    draft, *unless* his relationship with Smith and USC football is really
    bad.
    
    Dan
40.64Where is Jerry?LACV01::BRITOHeaven Bound...Fri Feb 01 1991 17:405
    Any news on Jerry Abair (sp?). I had heard some rumors that he wanted
    to play for the Raiders... has anything come of that? Is Al Davis
    interested?... A sound quaterback can make all the difference in a
    team, because offence and defence learn to rely and have confidence in
    the "leader"; that makes everyone else want to play better.
40.65FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, MRO1, DTN 297-2623 (eff 2/11)Fri Feb 01 1991 17:5210
    Bobby Hebert (pronounced A-bear) is the player to whom you're
    referring.  Jerry Adair is a late former Red Sox player.
    
    There is no news about Hebert wanting to play for the Raiders at this
    time.  He is, to the best of my knowledge, a complete free agent.
    
    I don't know how happy the Raiders are with Schroeder nor do I know if
    they're planning on keeping Steve Beuerlein.
    
    John
40.66REFINE::ASHEWhatever happened to Slick Watts?Sat Feb 02 1991 14:321
    Would the Pats look at him?
40.67NAMBE::CGRIEGOMon Feb 11 1991 17:4821
    Have'nt had a chance to get in here since before the Raiders/Bengals
    game 'til now. I just recently changed job responsibilities and
    inherited a heavy workload, so I proberly won't be gettin in here
    as often as I'd like.
    
    Raiders had a great win over Cinci, but really got their butts kicked
    in the AFC championship game. Don't think Bo would have made that
    much of a difference had he been healthy. The Raiders defense tore
    it up all season long and then got torn up in their last game, they
    didn't even have a clue. I personally think they screwed up during
    Buffalos first drive. Kelly and crew were gaining yardage on every
    play, but the Raiders defense was also gettin in there and they
    almost got Kelly on a couple of occasions, until the defensive coaches
    freaked out, called a time out, and changed their whole game plan.
    Oh well, I guess anything at this point is just meaningless
    speculation.
    
    Carlos (who hopes the Raiders won't lose to many good players to
            plan B, and who also thinks we might be seeing Major Harris
            instead of Marinovich, or Hebert in silver and black)
    
40.68STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Mar 22 1991 13:066
    SportsChannel reported this morning that the Raiders will likely make
    a contract offer to 49ers defensive back Ronnie Lott (who was left
    unprotected in Plan B).
    
    
    py
40.69EARRTH::BROOKSPick up the pace ....Fri Mar 22 1991 19:235
    Yea, the Raiders are willing to give Lott 2 years guaranteed. The
    Niners only want to promise 1991. The Vikes are also in the running for
    Lott's services as well.
    
    BBBBIIIIIIIGGGGGGGG mistake by the NIners if they let Lott slip away.
40.70Sorry to see him go!!!BOSOX::KHARRISSat Mar 23 1991 14:255
    The Raiders lost a good one when the Jets signed Bill Pickel the other
    day. I agree that the 49ers are making a big mistake if they let Lott
    get away.
    
                                 Kenn
40.71Good pickup for skyward JetsVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERThe crux of the biscuitMon Mar 25 1991 16:206
    WHat did Raiders fans think of Pickel's play last year?  I've heard
    it's been downhill since the pro bowl season of 2 or 3 years ago. 
    Whatever the case, the Jets are desparate for good, experienced DLs,
    and it doesn't hurt that Pickel's a Rutgers grad.
    
    Dan
40.72Big mistake by SF!!WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Mar 26 1991 00:353
       Raiders got Lott. $1million per. The 9ers asked him to take $200,000
    less. He told 'em: "see ya"!
                                    Denny
40.73Seen his best years...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 26 1991 11:5413
    
    > Raiders got Lott. $1million per. The 9ers asked him to take $200,000
    > less. He told 'em: "see ya"!
    
    I dunno.  The 49ers seem to have the Branch Rickey knack of moving a 
    player a year too early rather than a year too late.  I suspect 
    they'll miss Lott's leadership, but injuries were slowing him down 
    late in the year.  The 49ers have the foresight not to let all their
    great players age on the field like the Steelers did, and so far it's
    worked.
    
    glenn
    
40.74The Buffalo game was a fluke!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Mar 26 1991 12:5214
    Ronnie Lott, left unprotected by the 49'ers despite being an All-Pro
    last season, has signed a two-year contract wif da Raiders as a
    Plan B free agent. He'll move from free safety to strong safety
    with the Raiders, imagine that, Anderson and Lott in the same
    backfield !! Ouch! 
    
    Greg Bell, Napolean McCallum, and Vance Mueller are all up for grabs.
    This along with Bo's unknown future, could spell trouble for the
    Raiders, especially if Bell signs with another team. Marcus is still
    in MHO their best RB, but he's getting a little long in the tooth
    and will need Bells help back there, although Steve Smith could
    probably get the job done just as well.
    
    Carlos
40.75Oh, BTW: Bills 51, Faids 3 (heh, heh)BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Mar 26 1991 13:022
    Just what the Raiders need, another old player on the decline.  Is
    Alzado gonna try another comeback this season?  :^):^)
40.76ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Mar 26 1991 13:4914
    >>             -< Oh, BTW: Bills 51, Faids 3 (heh, heh) >-
    
    Joe, if you thought that was funny, you'll love this one: 
    
    Donks 5-11, worst team in the AFC West. (hee hee heee....)
    
    There, now that I got that outta my system, does anybody know how
    last years first round pick, Anthony Smith, is doing? He looked
    pretty good until that first game (?) when he got some kind of leg
    injury. Just wondering...
    
    Carlos
                                                         
    
40.77Read 'em & weep, Faider fans!BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Mar 26 1991 13:556
    
>    Donks 5-11, worst team in the AFC West. (hee hee heee....)
   
    Well, don't laugh too long, Carlos, because this only means an easy
    schedule for '91. 
 
40.78Raiders will be in it again next year...even bo-lessVLNVAX::MBROOKSTue Mar 26 1991 16:228
    Big Deal the Raiders got the buts wipped by buffalo, It did buffalo
    alot of good packing on the points and tiring down the team.  Great
    strategy score 51 pts to get to the superbowl just to come up short
    in the big one.  Raiders had a great season you cant take that away
    and yes the donks will now get a good draft pick and an easy schedule
    but the easy schedule still includes 2 games against each division foe
    so that could be 8 loses right there :-)
    								MaB
40.79ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Mar 26 1991 16:2811
    >>Well, don't laugh too long, Carlos, because this only means an
    >>easy schedule for '91.
    
    Oooo, good point, that is unless the Donks choke against other last
    place teams, which in turn would only add to the laughter. All in
    all 'though, it should be one heck of a tough division this year,
    with the Chargers improving by leaps and bounds, the Chiefs, Raiders,
    and Donks making things fun, and the dreaded Seahawks (I ain't falling
    for anything, anybody says about this team no more). 
    
    Carlos
40.80not doneTPWEST::ALVIDREZI am no longer irritatingTue Mar 26 1991 21:277
Word on the radio is that the Raiders are also going after Roger Craig,
also unprotected, to help shore up the possible loss of Bo.  Expect
a deal by the end of the week.

Nice name, "Raiders"

More news when I get it.
40.81NEST::PAPIAWed Mar 27 1991 15:118
    
    	Art Shell said Anthony Smith could have played at the
    end of last year but the rules wouldn't let him, so he's
    ok.
    
    
    Vinny
    
40.82ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Mar 28 1991 20:129
    Thanks Vinny,
    
    	Good news about Anthony Smith, I'm sure he'll help out. In other
    Raiders news, Greg Bell was said to be seriously considering an offer
    by the Vikings. Imagine that, Walker and Bell in the same backfield!
        I hope that the Raiders can sign Craig, just in case Bell does
    split. Anybody else know anything about the Viking/Bell deal?
    
    Carlos
40.83Keep Bell!!!NEST::PAPIAFri Mar 29 1991 13:239
    
    	I can't understand why people keep getting rid of 
    Greg Bell, the guy is great. I'd keep him before Craig
    or Allen, he's a much better running back than either
    of them, they might be better receivers out of the back-
    field but with LAs receivers who cares?
    
    
    Vinny
40.84COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Apr 01 1991 19:564
      The Broncos could use Bell.  He would be a good back-up for Bobby
    Humphrey.  Isn't to late now to pick plan B folks?
    
    	T-bone
40.85COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Apr 01 1991 20:059
       I was just thinking that its to bad Bo is gone, 'cause I thought the
    guy was great.
    
       If the Faiders have a crappy year,  will the excuses be because Bo
    is gone?
    
      Just startin' early;^^
    
    		T-Bone
40.86Raiders = 49'ers retirment home????ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Apr 02 1991 13:0426
    >>If the faiders have a crappy year, will the excuses be because
    >>Bo is gone?
    
    I doubt it, especially considering that the Raiders just signed
    Roger Craig. Lets see, that puts Marcus Allen, Roger Craig, Greg
    Bell (if he doesn't sign with somebody else), Steve Smith, Napolean
    McCallum (if he doesn't sign either), and Vance Mueller (if he doesn't
    sign) all playing for the Raiders. Miss Bo? Maybe, but I don't think
    they will be needing him. :-(
    
    >>The Broncos could use Bell.
    
    So could the other 26 teams. 
    
    >>He would be a good back-up for Bobby Humphrey.
    
    Or vice versa, I agree 'though, the Donks would have a great running
    attack with both of them back there.
    
    >>Isn't it to late now to pick plan B folks?
    
    Don't know when the deadline is, but again, the Raiders just signed
    Roger Craig yesterday.
                                        
    Carlos
40.87ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Apr 03 1991 17:3538
    Here's a list of who the Raiders signed and lost through Plan B.
    
      Signed                           Lost
    ------------------------------   -------------------------------
    Stefon Adams, wr, Dolphins       Bill Pickel, dt, to the Jets
    O'Brien Alston, lb, Colts        Alex Gordon, lb, to the Bengals
    Roger Craig, rb, 49'ers          Darrin Jordan, lb, to the 49'ers
    Vencie Glenn, s, Chargers
    Bruce Klostermann, lb, Rams
    Ronnie Lott, db, 49'ers
    Joel Patten, t, Chargers
    
    This is what Don Heinrich's Pro Preview//90 had to say about some
    of these guys.
    
    Bill Pickel is a former Pro Bowl nose tackle, but has chronic back
    problems and is starting to show his age (30). He's instinctive,
    uses his hands and plays with good technique. He makes more plays
    on effort than ability.
    
    Vencie Glenn has become a better than average free safety. He runs
    well, gets a nice jump on the ball, takes good angles and covers
    a lot of ground. Though he's fearless, Glenn doesn't always wrap
    up on tackles. He's also a sucker for play-action and gets caught
    shallow.
            
    O'Brien Alston underwent reconstructive knee surgery in '89 and
    questions linger about how well he will rebound from his injury.
                                                                    
    Joel Patten is smart and quick. He gives good effort, sustains and
    makes few mistakes. But his strength doesn't always match his size
    (6-7, 307). He's a catcher in run blocking and occasionally gets
    knocked back in pass protection by a good bull rush. Otherwise he's
    a solid pass protector who's tough to beat because of the real estate
    his size allows him to cover.
                                                                   
    
    Carlos
40.88Bo Knows Rip Off....Cut down in him primeVLNVAX::MBROOKSWed Apr 03 1991 18:305
    Anybody out there who doesnt think that the Bo-less Raiders are as
    good a team without him then with him DONT KNOW BO.  The Raiders are
    still going to be a tough team, they assured that by picking up Lott
    and Craig but the Bo loss will be a factor...No Doubt.
    								MaB
40.89Craig can't BLAST for TD like Bo;^^COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Apr 04 1991 19:1715
    re.88
          I'm glad you said that Bo is a big loss, 'cause last year (if my
    sometimes volatile memory serves me right) some faider fans kept
    saying how much of a difference Bo would have made in the Bills game,
    or also, wait til Bo shows up in week ? after Baseball...You remember
    all that type of talk.
    
       Bruce Klosterman might help against the run, but for over the middle
    coverage, forget it.  He had potential until is knee went, IMO.
    
    
       This SHOULD be a good "tough" season within the division.  Are the
    schedules released yet?
    
    	T-bone
40.907221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Apr 04 1991 19:186
    NFL schedules should be out within the next couple of weeks.  They'll
    all be available in the National and USA Today on the day they're
    released and I'm sure many of them will be posted in this conference. 
    Be patient.
    
    John
40.91Need LB'sDECXPS::KHARRISFri Apr 05 1991 11:049
    Greg Bell better than Allen???? I don't think so. Craig is aging so he
    has an advantage over him. Bell throughout the course of last year,
    when he played, repeatedly ran tentatively. I don't like the fact of
    losing him to another team for nothing though. The Raiders must go
    after LB's and OL in this draft. Buffalo destroyed them last year
    because of their lack of coverage from the LB and safety positions.
    Lott will sure up the safety position.
    
                                    Kenn
40.92NEST::PAPIAFri Apr 05 1991 15:3010
    
    	Greg Bell only played a few games last year so he
    can't be judged by that, the year before he had around
    1400 yds. I've been a big fan of Marcus Allen for his
    entire career but he can't run the ball anymore, he's
    too slow. 3rd down out of the backfield is the perfect
    role for him now.
    
    
    Vinny
40.93Moss a Raider!DECXPS::KHARRISSat Apr 13 1991 14:0012
    You obviously didn't see too much of Marcus last year then. He had an
    excellent season. Any back in the league could rush for over 1,000
    yards behind the Rams OL. Charles White did, Dickerson did, Bell did,
    and if I'm not mistaken, Cleveland Gary did last year.
    
    Getting back to Raider news, the Raiders got LB Winston Moss from Tampa
    Bay for future draft picks. Depending on what the draft picks will be,
    this looks like a good pick up for the silver and black.
    
    
    
                                Kenn
40.94Excellent????NEST::PAPIAThu Apr 18 1991 11:209
    
    	I did see him quite a alot, he hit the line and fell
    down or he would have a big hole closed because of his
    lack of speed. Since when is 500 yds and under 4 yds a
    carry excellent? He did look better this year than the
    last few, he had maybe 3 good games.
    
    
    Vinny
40.951991 ScheduleELMAGO::CGRIEGOSat Apr 20 1991 13:1026
    Here's the Raiders schedule for the '91 season:
    
    Sept 1.........at Houston, 2:00 pm  (All times Mountain Standard)
    Sept 8.............DENVER, 2:00 pm
    Sept 15......INDIANAPOLIS, 2:00 pm
    Sept 22........at Atlanta, 11:00 am
    Sept 29.....SAN FRANCISCO, 2:00 pm
    Oct 6...........SAN DIEGO, 2:00 pm
    Oct 13.........at Seattle, 7:30 pm
    Oct 20..........L.A. RAMS, 2:00 pm
    Oct 28.....at Kansas City, MNF 7:00 pm
    Nov 3............OPEN DATE........
    Nov 10..........at Denver, 2:00 pm
    Nov 17............SEATTLE, 2:00 pm
    Nov 24......at Cincinnati, 11:00 am
    Dec 1........at San Diego, 6:00 pm
    Dec 8.............BUFFALO, 2:00 pm
    Dec 16.....at New Orleans, MNF 7:00 pm
    Dec 22........KANSAS CITY, 2:00 pm
    
    All games capitalized are home games.
    
    Carlos
    
                   
    
40.96Solid DraftDASXPS::KHARRISMon Apr 22 1991 11:2217
    In yesterdays draft, here are the Raiders selections;
    
    1-Todd Marinovich  QB USC
    2-Nick Bell     RB Iowa
    4-Raghib "The Rocket" Ismail  WR Notre Dame
    
    The Raiders didn't have a 3rd round pick, I believe it went to Tampa
    in the Winston Moss deal. I really like Marinovich and Bell. Bell is
    6-2 and wieghs 252. He runs a 4.45 40 and has good hands. His stock
    dropped as the draft got closer however many people feel it was a steal
    for the Raiders. They made a trade with Seattle to obtain the pick. I'm
    not sure of the details on the trade.
    
    With Ismail the Raiders retain his rights for 4 years, the length of
    his Canadien contract, and have the right of first refusal forever.
    
    Kenn
40.97Lyle Alzado being treated for a tumorBASEX::BROWNMon Apr 22 1991 17:0113
    
    I read in the paper last weekend that Lyle Alzado has a brain
    tumor.  He will be taking chemotheraphy for the tumor.  He
    also got into a scuffle with a policewoman at his home.  The
    policewoman alleges that Alzado pushed her against a balcony
    railing.  Lyle's doctors told the judge that with the tumor
    he would be incapable of doing what the policewoman said.
    
    I guess his speech is slurred and he has trouble walking.
    
    Did anyone else hear about this?
    
    \pjb
40.98ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Apr 22 1991 18:0017
    Re .97
    
    Yeah, I read about that too. It's too bad about Alzado, according
    to his physicians the tumor is in-operable and the only treatment
    they can give him is radiation, chemo-therapy type stuff.
    
    Re .96
    
    I agree, so far the Raiders are doing a solid job in the draft.
    Marinovich could turn out to be the Raiders future QB if he can
    put the past behind him and clean it up a little. Nick Bell...
    another great pick-up by the Raiders, though they weren't really
    hurting at this position. Picking Ismail in the 4th might end up
    being a wasted pick, but then again he might end up hating Canada
    in which case the Raiders will make out like bandits.
    
    Carlos 
40.99DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Apr 23 1991 10:276
    Alzado has suffered a stroke, due to his brain cancer.
    
    I haven't seen any comment about recovery, either the stroke or the
    cancer.
    
    lEe
40.1001991 NFL DraftELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Apr 23 1991 13:1317
    Here's a list of players that the Raiders picked up in the draft.
    Players are listed by round, overall selection, name, position,
    and school.
    
    1   (24) Todd Marinovich, QB, Southern Cal.
    2   (43) Nick Bell, RB, Iowa
    4  (100) Raghib Ismail, WR, Notre Dame
    6  (146) Nolan Harrison, DT, Indiana
    8  (213) Brian Jones, LB, Texas
    8  (219) Todd Woulard, LB, Alabama A&M
    9  (247) Tahaun Lewis, DB, Nebraska
    10 (274) Andrews Glover, TE, Grambling
    12 (330) Dennis Johnson, WR, Winston-Salem
                                              
    
    Carlos
                                    
40.101?NEST::PAPIATue Apr 23 1991 18:237
    
    	Anybody know why Nick Bell lasted so long, we was rated
    2nd best player in the draft! some people had him going in
    the top 10.
    
    
    Vinny
40.102Looks like LA will lose opener;^COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Apr 24 1991 21:186
      Moranovich future QB?  Didn't faider fans say that about Buerlin and
    Shroeder as well?
    
      The good move for la was to take the rights of the Rocket man.
    
    	Tim
40.103Hope it's not seriousNEST::PAPIAThu Apr 25 1991 15:586
    
    	USA Today reported that Nick Bell has a knee problem
    that might require surgery.
    
    
    Vinny
40.104COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu May 02 1991 21:285
      Read in the paper today that Alzado was being arrained for hitting a
    female officer somehere in California....I wonder if it has something
    to do with his brain illness or stupidity?
    
    	Tj
40.105LAGUNA::MAY_BRGraphic sexual innuendoThu May 09 1991 16:3218
    
    Something funny is going on here.  Alzado's lawyer says he is
    practically unable to stand up, and couldn't have done it.  Is the cop
    an LA cop?  I wonder if they are trying to get out from under the
    backlash?
    
    BTW-  If any of you Raider fans would like a little graphic thingy that
    makes your prompt look like a offishul Raiders' helmet, I have somethin
    filed away.  Before one of you non-technoweenies get horrified at the
    thought that I may have lost my Nontechnoweenies Club Memberrship Card
    (and therefore the precidency), my customer created this command file,
    and he mailed it to me.  All of the thousands of Phoenix Cardinal fans
    are also in luck, as he made one of those too.  I think there is a
    dragon and a enterprise thingy (as well as his company's logo).  Let me
    know if you want me to mail it to you.
    
    
    Bruce 
40.107ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus. Fri May 10 1991 14:347
    Hi Bruce,
    
    I'll take a copy of that Raider helmet thingy too if you don't mind.
    
    Any news on Raider #2 draft pick Nick Bells injury?
    
    Carlos
40.108A Mess O' Prompts, some of them team logosSHALOT::MEDVIDcould not hear or see for jealousyFri May 10 1991 14:50849
40.109Pre-Season Schedule '91ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus. Fri May 10 1991 15:269
    Here's the Raider's pre-season schedule, all times MST:
    
    San Francisco at Raiders  Sat. July 27th, 2pm
    Raiders -vs- Miami Sat. Aug. 3rd, 8pm, American Bowl '91 at Tokyo
    Raiders at Dallas Mon. Aug. 12th, 6pm
    Chicago at Raiders Sat. Aug. 17th, 2pm
    Raiders at San Diego Fri. Aug. 23, 8pm
    
    Carlos
40.110COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri May 10 1991 18:291
      Raiders vs San diego for last pre-season?   Thats a strange...
40.111BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Fri May 10 1991 18:386
>      Raiders vs San diego for last pre-season?   Thats a strange...
    
    I don't know if it's a annual preseason thing between these teams,
    but they did play each other in the preseason last year also.
    
    Joe
40.112Hmmm?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus. Sat May 11 1991 13:5010
    >>I don't know if it's a annual preseason thing between these teams,
    >>but they did play each other in the preseason last year also.
    
    Hi Joe, it's gotta be an annual thing, because they also played
    San Fran., Dallas, and Chicago last year too. The only difference
    is last year they played the Saints at Wembley, and this year they're
    playing the Dolphins in Tokyo.
    
    Carlos  (also-too huh? oh well!)
    
40.113the ones with the wandering eyes well....AGNT99::CHILDSWilt's heart was 2 sizes 2 smallMon May 13 1991 11:108
 No, it's a good ole boys thing. We schedule the teams that are close together
 geographically so that we can cut down on traveling expenses and increase our
 own booty. The coaches like it cause they get to work out at their own 
 facilities. The players cause it keeps them closer to their familes. Atleast
 some players...;^)

 mike
40.114ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTrust Jesus. Tue May 14 1991 21:189
    >We schedule the teams that are close together geographically so
    >that we can cut down on traveling expenses and increase our own
    >booty.
    
    As thin as Uncle-Al is, he could stand to have his booty increased,
    coach Shell on the other hand would probably be better off with
    some lippo-suction! :-)
    
    Carlos
40.115ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu May 30 1991 15:0524
    >                -< Looks like LA will lose opener;^ >-
    
    Tim, do you mean the pre-season opener against San Fran, the regular
    season opener against Houston, or there first home game opener against
    the Donks??  
    
    > Moranovich future QB? Didn't faider fans say that about Buerlin
    > and Shroeder as well?
    
    Marinovich definetly has the potential to be the Raiders future
    QB, but I doubt it will be the immediate future. Keep in mind that
    the Raiders also have the Canadian bench warmer Major Harris on
    hold, though he may never amount to much ??? Steve Beurlein is an
    excellent back-up, and I'd be interested to see how Mr. Ed's stats
    compared to Schroeder's last year. Speaking of Mr. Ed, I don't think
    he'll be around much longer, who do the donk's have waiting to take
    the reins after Elway ????  Kubiak ??? HaaHa! That's a laugher.... 
    
    > The good move for LA was to take the rights of the Rocket man.
    
    Agreed, having the rocket in the pocket can't hurt. You gotta also
    love the Nick Bell steal in the second round. 
    
    Carlos
40.116BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Thu May 30 1991 15:318
>    ...Steve Beurlein is an
>    excellent back-up, 
    
    Moderator, this comment needs to be moved to the Sports.Joke topic.
    Thanks.  :^) :^)
    
    Joe
    
40.117Your just now replying?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu May 30 1991 17:5512
    re-1
    
      Rollin' on that Joe!!
    
      Re-2    I don't love anything the faiders do...except lose of course.
    
      Also Kubiak is a good backup.  He would be better if he had more
    playing time, which of course won't happen if Elway stays healthy.  
    Kubiak could be a starter on many teams that are in need of a QB,
    someone like maybe the Faiders, colts, pats, bears, and Chargers.
    
    	Tim
40.118You're reachin' there TimGENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelThu May 30 1991 18:408
    
    T-bone
    
    	There's no way Kubiak would start for anybody else in the
    	league.  His passes look like the ducks LuFay shoots at....
    	wounded and wobbly.  :*)
    
    Claybone
40.119faiders in 1991 = 8-8 season if their lcukyCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu May 30 1991 19:2010
       Claybone,  Thats why I stated Kubiak would be better if he played
    more.  Bench warming for 7 years doesn't bring the best out of a
    person.
    
    
      Gary has his days and then he gives the other team their day.
    
      It don't matter since the faiders still need a QB!!!
    
    	Tim
40.120Much to Simms' chagrinSHALOT::HUNTBill, those are historical babes ...Thu May 30 1991 19:335
40.121ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu May 30 1991 21:1927
    > You're just now replying?
    
    So call me slow.....it's just that I like to take my time and think
    things through....:-)
    
    Re. to Kubiak being a starter:
    
    I'm gonna have to agree with Claybone, Tim, ....you're reaching,
    Although you could probably make a good case for Kubiak starting
    for the pats.
    
    
    > The faiders still need a QB?
    
    And they're working on it, but the Donks are also gonna need a QB
    (especially after Mr. Ed turns in another sour year) but they don't
    have anyone in particular in mind. Or do they ???
    
    > faiders in 1991 = 8-8 season if they're lucky
    
    First you're reaching then you're dreaming....you probably fantasize
    that two of these losses are to the powerful Donks too huh?? :-)
    
    Seriously tho, it could happen. I think that all of the AFC West teams
    will be tough to beat this year.
    
    Carlos
40.122Bad wheelHPSRAD::SANTOSHey Tracy, together or solo?Fri May 31 1991 12:258
>>    Agreed, having the rocket in the pocket can't hurt. You gotta also
>>    love the Nick Bell steal in the second round.

     Nick Bell slipped to the 2nd round because he has a bad knee. I think 
     I remember reading he had surgery on his knee a few days after the 
     draft. I maybe wrong, but I pretty sure.

  Chuck
40.123BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSFri May 31 1991 17:1012
    Well I think the Raiders did alot to improve themselves.  Marinovich is
    a reach, but the Raiders seem to do well with reaches, so maybe this
    one will pan out for them too.  Bell?  I dunno.  It's odd to see him
    rated sooo high and drop so far.  Somethin' was up, maybe bad knees.
    
    Chargers really strengthened the D up the middle.  Broncos are pinning
    alot on Croel, not sure he's up to the task.  Seahawks I didn't follow.
    And Chiefs I don't remember, but you get the feeling that the Raiders,
    Chargers and Chiefs are on the way up, while the Broncos and Seahawks
    are either holding steady or dropping.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
40.124Thurman ThomasDUCK::SERVICEDESKTue Jun 11 1991 12:036
    
    A certain Buffalo running back also dropped to the second round due to
    supposedly bad knees. Have not had many complaints the last three years
    though.
    
    Nick R
40.125SOS!BOSOX::KHARRISFri Jun 14 1991 19:2515
    Everything that I've read questioned Bells toughness as a runner. He
    does have a knee problem but nothing that serious. I like the pick
    because the raiders are getting old at running back.
    
    Once again we will hear how Schroeder is a stiff and he doesn't belong
    in the league. Once again the Raiders will win the division and
    everyone will still be calling him a stiff. They could win the Super
    Bowl and everyone would find a reason to call him a stiff. All year
    people said the  defense was carrying the offense, well I didn't see
    Jay out there playing "D" when the Bills lit them up for 51 points.
    I know he threw 5 ints., but when everyone in the world knows your
    gonna pass what can you do. He's no super star, but neither is
    Hostetler and the Giants won the Bowl with him.
    
    Kenn
40.126COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jun 19 1991 14:501
      Winning the division?   We will see,  but don't bet your house on it!
40.127Marinovich=Montana of the 90'sELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Jun 27 1991 18:564
    One month from now the Raiders will play the gay-bay 9'ers in their
    first pre-season game......football season's almost here :-)
    
    Carlos
40.128SOLANA::MAY_BRWant a Japanese stockbrokerThu Jun 27 1991 20:517
================================================================================
Note 40.127              The Raiders-'90 AFC West Champs              127 of 127
ELMAGO::CGRIEGO                                       4 lines  27-JUN-1991 15:56
                      -< Marinovich=Montana of the 90's >-
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    What's that mean, both out of football by 1993?
40.129ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jul 09 1991 19:096
    The Raiders began their training camp on Sunday the 7th. You can
    bet they'll be practicing on ways to stop the no huddle type of
    offense that the Bills killed'em with in the AFC Championship game
    (more like blow-out). 
    
    Carlos
40.130ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jul 09 1991 19:515
    Also forgot to mention that second string QB Steve Beuerlein signed 
    a two year contract, and rookie RB Nick Bell also signed.
    
    Carlos
    
40.131CSC32::J_HERNANDEZWith a knickknack paddywhackWed Jul 10 1991 13:402
    Carlos, how the hail are the ChaRaiders(tm) gonna use the no-huddle
    when Schroeder can barely remember the plays after a regular huddle?
40.132ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 10 1991 13:517
    Junior (?), re-read it bro-ski, I didn't say that the Raiders are
    gonna practice the no-huddle offense, but, that they're gonna practice
    ways to stop it (defense). You can bet that after the way the Bills
    whacked the Raiders using the no-huddle, that other teams might
    try using it against the Raiders too. Que no ?
    
    Carlos
40.133CSC32::J_HERNANDEZWith a knickknack paddywhackWed Jul 10 1991 14:184
    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
    
    I saw no huddle, I saw a raving Carlos, I saw Raiders getting thrashed.
    I guess I shoulda read on.
40.134ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Jul 11 1991 19:296
    Raiders first round draft pick, QB Todd Marinovich has missed three
    days of practice, and there are still several veterans that remain
    unsigned.......not to good. Coach Shell says that coaching is his
    business and not contracts.
    
    Carlos
40.135RAIDERS #1 IN 91WMOIS::E_FASSETTMon Jul 15 1991 11:056
    The paper this morning has Marcus Allen, Jeff Gossett, and Jeff Jaeger,
    all agreeing to terms. the Raiders also cut Ron Burton(lb), Brian Sap
    and Sean Moore(rb), Sean Smith (wr), and Rob Flory(ot). Also it says
    that tight end Mike Dyal was put on the
    physically-unable-to-perorm-list. Can anyone give us more information
    on this.
40.136STAR::YANKOWSKASParty on Garth! Party on Wayne!Mon Jul 15 1991 12:034
    Marinovich signed over the weekend, don't know the contract terms.
    
    
    py
40.137Baby snake ???ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jul 15 1991 20:1514
    >Marinovich signed over the weekend, don't know the contract terms.
    
    The financial terms were not disclosed, but it is a three year deal.
    Marinovich was the 24th player selected in the draft, and was the
    7th first-rounder to sign a contract. He was on the field for
    a walk-through with the teams veterans Sunday morning, then
    participated in the afternoon practice. He ran the offense for a
    limited number of plays as the 4th string QB. No report on how well
    he did.
    
    
    Carlos
    
40.138I miss the old RON...funny guyAGNT99::CHILDSsign said, Stay Away Fool..Mon Jul 15 1991 22:3317
 >    Marinovich was the 24th player selected in the draft, and was the
 >  7th first-rounder to sign a contract. He was on the field for
 >   a walk-through with the teams veterans Sunday morning, then
 >   participated in the afternoon practice. He ran the offense for a
 >   limited number of plays as the 4th string QB. No report on how well
 >   he did.
    
    
 He's better than anyone else they have at that posistioN. If he gets his head
 on straight he'll be a star. Too bad he's on the wrong team. Too bad he has to
 throw to Gault....

 sidebar question: Did my good buddy Mr. X aka Stevie_boy make it through the
 recent cutbacks?

 mike

40.139BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Jul 16 1991 09:547
    I heard that Marinovich has a part of his salary held back by the
    Raiders, to be paid after 3 (?) years if he "behaves", whatever that
    means.
    
    Any details?
    
    lEe
40.141Steven is still here and receiving treatment for OURGNG::Withdrawl...OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Remote Selling ServicesTue Jul 16 1991 14:520
40.142MAXWEL::CHILDSsign said, Stay Away Fool..Tue Jul 16 1991 15:032
thanks Jeff give him our best Elway is Gay cheer...
40.143Baby SnakeELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jul 16 1991 17:3339
    I've been meaning to enter some brief profiles about some of the
    players that the Raiders drafted this spring, and now that I've
    finally remembered to bring in the May issue of Raider News I'll
    try to enter them in whenever possible. Since we've been discussing
    Marinovich, and since he was the Raiders first round pick, I'll
    start with him:
    
    Round 1, (24th player taken)
    
    Todd Marinovich, QB, 6'4", 220lbs, USC
    
    Possesses all the tools you look for in a top-level blue chip prospect;
    size, arm strength, maturity, field vision, and intelligence ...
    Left handed passer very calm under pressure with a smooth, quick
    release ... Father, Marv, was a three year letterman at USC and
    both played for and coached with the Raiders ... Entered draft
    following sophomore year ... Started 11 games last season, completing
    60% of passes (196 of 322) for 2,423 yds and 13 touchdowns ... Added
    a touchdown on a nine yard scoring reception ... Was named PAC 10
    Player of the Week following a 338 yrd performance ... In 1989 he
    became the first freshman to earn all-Pac-10 honors after ranking
    3rd in conference, and 19th nationally with a 133.2 passing efficiency
    rating ... Redshirted as a freshmen ... Has the third best season
    in Trojan history ... Was drafted by the Calif. Angels in 1988 as a 
    pitcher, despite never having played baseball in high school ...
    Then of course, there's the thing he is probably most recognized for, 
    the drug controversy. :-(  The magazine goes on to show all of Todd's
    high school accomplishments (which are also pretty impressive) but
    I think you guys get the picture, if not I'll sum it up to say the
    guy's a winner on the football field.
    
    Carlos
    
    P.S.
       If anybody's interested in getting a subscription to the 'Raider
       News' magazine, which comes out monthly during the off season
       and bi-monthly during the season, let me know.
      
    
40.144Good luck ToddTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Tue Jul 16 1991 18:357
As I've said before, I wish Marinovich the best.  He seems to have decent skills,
but I fear that being with the raiders, he will be too influenced by his father,
who, in my opinion ruined the kid's life.  The pressure his dad put on him (as 
portrayed by a couple of SI articles over the past few years) is what I suspect
led him to his drug 'problem'.

=Bob=
40.145ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jul 16 1991 20:3615
    Hi Bob, I've read other replies similar to yours about how Marinovich's
    father has really been a negative influence in his life (or something
    to that effect) . I haven't read any of the SI articles though,
    and was wondering in what ways has his father ruined his life?
    
    In a (sort of) related interview with coach Shell, the coach was asked
    if he had any problems with Marinovich's character, and his off
    field problems. He replied, "Players draw alot of publicity. As
    always we research the background of every player we select in the
    draft and we feel pretty good about Todd Marinovich. We know everything
    there is to be known about him. We've researched it and talked about
    it. We feel his future is ahead of him, we don't foresee any problems
    at all."
                  
    Carlos
40.146BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Jul 17 1991 09:518
    Carlos, I read the articles but can't remember the details.  I do
    recall that his father put a tremendous amount of pressure on him to
    succeed in football.  Seems that no matter what he did, his Dad would
    point out a weakness or failure in his performance.  
    
    Bob, you probably have more info.  Please detail some of it for us.
    
    lEe
40.147Good luck ToddTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Wed Jul 17 1991 12:3432
It's been a while since I read this stuff, so bear with me if there are any 
inaccuracies:

From what I remember about the articles, Todd was basically bred to be a 
QUARTERBACK.  Not a football player, but a quarterback.  His dad decided 
before he was born that he wanted his son to be a football star, and specifically
a QB.  He focused him at an early age, and controlled every athetic breath the 
kid took.  Perhaps the most publicized thing was that Todd has (had?) NEVER 
eaten at McDonalds, because Marv (dad) wouldn't have his son eat junk food.  

Todd was perhaps the greatest high school QB ever, the comparisons were made
with Joe Namath (could never spell his name).  Through all this, dad was always
Todd's worst critic.  He would make the kid watch hours of films, etc., and
always offer his criticism.  Somewhere in the mix, his parents got divorced, and 
Todd got closer to his mother, whe nurtured his interest in art (his college 
major), and seems to want Todd to be happy, no matter what he does.

I don't recall how he ended up at USC, but I know that dad kept tabs on him 
while there.  The first article in SI was written before he started there, and 
the second was after last season.

Basically my point of view is that the kid has been dominated, and had enormous
pressure put on him.  At 22 (or however old he is), it got to him, and he 
couldn't get along with his teammates and coaches, and got involved in drugs 
as the ultimate rebellion.  I remeber reading that when he got arrested, his 
mother bailed him out, and he was crying, saying that he had just blown his 
entire future.

As I said before, I wish him the best, and hope he can be a happy and effective 
football player.

=Bob=
40.148FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jul 17 1991 12:555
    Marv Marinovich is the ultimate pushy parent.  I wish Todd had been
    drafted by someone other than a local team.  Marv is very close with Al
    Davis, however, and this could turn into a difficult situation.
    
    John
40.149OZARDZ::WASKOMWed Jul 17 1991 15:458
    I've always wondered, with such intense focus on a single goal, what
    will happen when Todd reaches the inevitable end of his football
    career.  For Todd's sake, I hope it doesn't end by injury, 'cause I
    have a feeling that Dad would be a royal pain in the rear if that's the
    case.  Like John, I wish the guy good luck -- I have a feeling he's
    going to need it.
    
    A&W
40.152Predict more trouble for MarinovichVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERIsthmus be my lucky day.Wed Jul 17 1991 16:5917
    >Is it
    >wrong to get them to reach their potential, instead of letting them
    >flounder and get lazy (which is what they do)? 
    
    In the case of Marv Marinovich, who pushed son Todd to the extreme, it
    appears the answer is yes.  Instead of guiding, he forced.  He
    attempted to control every single aspect of Todd's life, and, in
    effect, chose Todd's career while he was still in the womb.  The
    general sense I got is that he robbed him of his childhood to further
    his own dreams of siring a QB.  Is that right?
    
    What you get in this day and age is rebellion.  Todd regressed in his
    time at USC and became a devisive factor on the team.  He made poor
    choices which he may have overcome.  He's 21 or 22 years old, and
    somehow, I doubt that his days of rebellion against authority are over.
    
    Dan
40.153Hope Todd does wellTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Wed Jul 17 1991 17:2517
    Basically, my recallection of the articles I read pretty much follow
    what Dan said.
    
    It is one thing to push kids in the way of guidance (I'm certain that
    is what you do Hawk ;^)) and what Todd's dad did.  
    
    As best I recall, the first article I read was not judgemental towards
    Marv, and focused on Todd's future, and what he could become.  I just
    think that everyone who read it came to a similar conclusion, and it
    became a fact.
    
    I agree that nobody forced Todd to get into drugs, I just don't think
    it was the "big bucks, arrogant athlete" getting into it for fun, or
    whatever.  Once again, I wish Todd luck (that was me A&W), and hope
    that LA is not the wrong place for him.
    
    =Bob=
40.154His dad sounds like a drip.CRBOSS::DERRYNKOTB Rool!Wed Jul 17 1991 17:365
    Isn't Todd the one who never had McDonald's food or a coke (cola)?
    
    I remember reading something like that, in SI, a long while back...
    
    
40.155FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jul 17 1991 17:378
    Yup, he's the one.  Programmed from birth to be a QB, never had junk
    food, mom was on a very special diet all through pregnancy, dad spared
    no effort or expense to make him great.
    
    I agree that some degree of parental push is important but I think dad
    took it a bit too far.
    
    John
40.157CAM::WAYHigh Toned Son of a BitchWed Jul 17 1991 19:021
Can you say "Daddy Dearest"?
40.158TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Wed Jul 17 1991 19:2418
Hawk 

In your case, it was probably BECAUSE of McD's that she hit those dingers... ;^)

Many people can probably relate to Marv's actions, and there may have been cases
in the past when parents' influence has pushed an athlete to stardom.  Somebody 
correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't Mickey Mantle's dad have similar tendancies?

Also, there is a big difference between pushing and making sacrifices for kids
who are talented.  A friend of mine was a great bicycle racer when he was a kid,
and had his sites set on the Olympics (this was pre Greg Lamond, so cycling 
wasn't that big a sport).  Anyway, he had a crash on a training ride one day.  
His bike was banged up, his riding clothes and shoes were ripped, but he wasn't 
badly hurt.  He got up the next morning, and found his clothes and shoes sewn,
and his bike repaired.  His dad had stayed up all night working on it.  To me 
that is sacrifice.

=Bob=
40.159You can see the strictness in his palyVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERIsthmus be my lucky day.Wed Jul 17 1991 19:3326
>but didn't Mickey Mantle's dad have similar tendancies?
    
    From what I've read of Mutt Mantle's relationship with his son, no, he
    wasn't similar.  And recall that Mickey grew up in Oklahoma in the '30s
    and '40s which is a world of difference to kids growing up in the '70s
    and '80s.  Mutt Mantle (as described by Mickey) certainly "guided" his
    son, and certainly helped develop him as a player (switch hitter, moral
    lesson about quitting) and certainly sacrificed for his son (a miner
    who died of black lung disease).  But I've never heard a source claim
    anything negative about what he did.
    
    Marinovich is not the natural physical speciman that Mickey Mantle was
    to baseball.  He is/was referred to as RoboQB because so much of what
    he did was so perfectly textbook.  He probably owes his football career
    to his father, because if he hadn't have developed him physically and
    taught him and drilled him on the game, there's probably a lot better
    "born quarterbacks".
    
    Personally, I was pretty disappointed in Todd's development last year
    and I thought it was a reflection on his abilities having finally found
    their level.  Perhaps it was more emotional immaturity that help him
    back, and he will go on to have a good career.  It will go a long way
    to finding out if you can make an athlete or not, which I don't know if
    it's necessarily a good thing.
    
    Dan
40.160COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jul 17 1991 21:571
      It don't matter,  the faiders still need a QB
40.161MAXWEL::CHILDSsign said, Stay Away Fool..Wed Jul 17 1991 22:2612
  The biggest thing I remember about the Mick was that when his father pitched
  to him he batted right handed and when his grandfather pitched to him he bat-
  ted left handed or vice versa...

  Dan, you're disappointment in Todd's development is natural after all he
  set some pretty high standards for himself with his freshman year performance.
  I tend to think his lack of development last year had more to do with his
  off field activites. I think the Raiders made a steal. Heck the kid hasn't
  even played a game yet and he's already the best QB in the paltry AFC West...

  mike
40.162Paltry !!!OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Remote Selling ServicesThu Jul 18 1991 13:0815
  Dan, you're disappointment in Todd's development is natural after all he
  set some pretty high standards for himself with his freshman year performance.
  I tend to think his lack of development last year had more to do with his
  off field activites. I think the Raiders made a steal. Heck the kid hasn't
  even played a game yet and he's already the best QB in the paltry AFC West...

  mike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


I'm dissapointed with you Mike.  Seattle has a QB that consistently is rated at 
the top of the heap very similar to a NY GIANTS QB that basically sucks wind 
but can lead the league with QB ratings. 

Jeff
40.163thanks Jeff, you've probably cost me another night's sleep ;^)MAXWEL::CHILDSsign said, Stay Away Fool..Thu Jul 18 1991 16:360
40.164Will Todd's success breed other PUSHY fathers?VIRTUE::ANDERSONrookie at largeThu Jul 18 1991 20:2510
    Todd must have been brain washed enough to start to think and believe
    that HE did indeed WANT to be a pro quarterback. 
    
    I am reminded of the young actor in Dead Poets Society, whose dad insisted
    he would be a doctor, over the young man's constant resistance.....that 
    kid rebelled, as many teenagers have! (I will not spoil it for any who 
    have not seen this very good movie by telling you how).  
    
    
    
40.16526340::ROBICHAUDTheGreatHilltopCowheadCaperFri Jul 19 1991 15:184
    	My father never pushed me.  He preferred straight rights to
    the chin.
    
    				/Don
40.16617135::CGRIEGOMon Jul 22 1991 14:2517
    Haven't had a chance to get in here 'til now, that's some pretty
    good stuff about Todd's relationship to his father. I'm curious
    to know if Todd ever had anything either bad or good to say about
    his pop in these articles, cause I guess anybody can say anything
    about somebody else's parents but only the child really knows if
    their parents are good or bad. 
    
    Re. .165 
    
    Don, Don't know if you were joking or if you were serious but your
    reply brings out a very good point with regards to all of this. There
    are a lot worse kinds of parents out there than Todd's. If Marv's 
    biggest sins as a parent were that he didn't let his son eat junk food,
    and he pushed him to success, well then he's better than lots of
    others out there.
    
    Carlos
40.167ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jul 22 1991 19:0522
    Here's a brief profile on the Raiders #2 pick.
    
    Round 2, (43rd player taken)
    Nick Bell, RB, 6'2", 250lbs, Iowa
    
    Bruising inside runner with tremendous quickness for a player his
    size ... Possesses massive thighs and powerful legs and is known
    to drive through his would-be tacklers ... Accelerates well through
    the holes ... Displays flashy cutback back ability and is an effective
    receiver coming out of the backfield ... Versatile athlete who can
    play both halfback, and fullback ... Performed on schools track
    team as a sprinter ... Named to numerous All-American teams and
    earned All-Big Ten honors following senior season in which he led
    team in rushing with 945 yards and 10 touchdowns on 155 carries
    (6.1 yard average) ... Also caught 18 passes for 223 yards and a
    pair of scores ... Averaged 106.2 all-purpose yards per game as
    a senior ... Named Offensive Most Valuable Player as a junior ...
    And like #1 Marinovich, Bell also has an impressive high school
    list of accomplishments. He sounds kind of like a Bo Jackson that
    can catch. 
    
    Carlos
40.168Isn't Todd #3?TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Tue Jul 23 1991 17:4815
RE .166

Carlos

I don't recall many quotes directly from Todd about his father in either article.
Once again, it has been a while, so maybe I'm wrong.  While I'm sure there are
worse parents out there, to me the two most damaging things a parent can do is
either to totally dominate their kid (like Slasher's dad 8^), and Marv), or not 
care and ignore their kids.  Either one of these things usually lead to problems
in the long run.

=Bob=

BTW - Where is Todd on the depth chart?  Isn't he #3 right now?  I didn't expect
       him to play much this year.
40.169ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jul 23 1991 19:0827
    =Bob=, I think you're right about him being #3, I don't see Vince
    Evans name on this years roster. He might even make it to #2 or
    even #1 by the end of pre-season ('specially if his old man gets
    on his case ........ uhemmm ... sorry couldn't resist :-).
                                    
    Next in line on the Raider draftee profiles is Raghib Ismail who
    was selected in the fourth round. But, I think that because he probably
    won't be playing in the NFL for some time (if ever), plus the fact
    that everybody already knows everything about him, I'll just skip him,
    and move on to the Raiders sixth round pick:
    
    Round 6 (146th player taken)
    Nolan Harrison, DT, 6-5, 290 Indiana
    
    Possesses all the physical tools, with fine size, speed, strength and
    long arms ...  Very athletic and has shown ability to neutralize
    blocker at point of attack and utilize the power rush ... Sat out
    senior season for disciplinary reasons ... Starter at defensive
    tackle in 1989, earning All-Big Ten Honorable Mention honors ...
    Recorded numerous tackles, sacks, and blocked passes during his
    college career ... Redshirted as a freshman ... Was a high school 
    letterman in football, track, and wrestling.   
    
    
    Carlos
                           
    (By the way, who's slasher?)
40.170ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 24 1991 15:597
    OT, Bruce Wilkerson agreed to terms today leaving the Raiders with
    only three unsigned veterans left: Pro-Bowl C, Don Mosebar, and 
    defensive linemen Scott Davis, and Bob Golic. They really need to
    get these knuckle-heads signed, especially Mosebar, and Davis.
    
    Carlos
    
40.171Are you ready for some football....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 24 1991 17:0125
    Next in draftee profiles......
    
    Round 8 (213th player taken)
    
    Brian Jones LB, 6-1, 240 Texas
    
    Great run defender who gets into the backfield in a flash to make
    the big play ... Has great upper body strength with tremendous agility
    for a player his size, using foot speed to slide away from blocks
    ... Joined Longhorns prior to his junior year after transferring
    from UCLA ... All Southwest Conference selection while starting
    all year at middle linebacker as senior and leading team in tackles
    with 116 hits along with 3 sacks and 5 stops for losses ... Credited
    with 8 QB pressures and a pair of pass deflections while causing
    5 fumbles and recovering another one ... Also led team in tackles
    as a junior with 108 ... Redshirted as a freshman at UCLA, and missed
    his sophomore year due to a back injury ... Lettered in football,
    track, baseball, and basketball in high school
    
    
    Also forgot to mention that the Raiders traded future draft picks to 
    Tampa Bay for LB, Winston Moss. Don't know too much about him though.
    
    Carlos                                                    
                                                   
40.172COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jul 24 1991 18:231
      Still need a q?
40.173Moss & Lott solid additions!!!DECXPS::KHARRISWed Jul 24 1991 19:0311
    Winston Moss is the man responsible for keeping such high draftees as
    Keith McCants and Broderick Thomas on the bench their rookie season!
    He will replace Jerry Robinson as the cover man on passing situations.
    He should be a fulltime player. 
    
    The raiders really need to get moesbar and Golic into camp. I'm a big
    Scott Davis fan, but the Raiders still have last years #1 pick, anthony
    Smith, waiting in the wings. Davis finally came into his own last year
    and he really needs this year to develope into a premiere DL.
    
    Kenn
40.174ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 24 1991 19:144
    > Still need a q?
    
    Tim, not as bad as you guys need a 'd' !   :-)
    
40.175EARRTH::BROOKSIncrease The Peace !Thu Jul 25 1991 14:529
    I saw Lyle Alzado on CNN two nights ago. Geez....he looks like hell. 
    
    What was really striking is that CNN in my town is Channel 63. On 62 is
    a comedy channel. Guess who was a guest host ?
    
    Yep - Alzado. This must have been taped a year ago when he was trying
    to make the Raiders. I flipped back and forth .... real sad to see.
    
    Doc
40.176CAM::WAYHigh Toned Son of a BitchThu Jul 25 1991 15:287
Yeah, 

He and his wife were on Larry King Live.  Tough to see him so fragile
looking...


'Saw
40.177Real Wierd...Did the same clickingMRVAX::MBROOKSThu Jul 25 1991 16:405
    Wierd...I saw alzado with the bandana on his head all skinny and sikly
    and decided to switch to the comedians at 11:00 on cha 3 and there he
    was hosting the show...I took a double take....Now a triple take. 
    Still feel for the guy....(Great comedians that night).
    							M_Air_B
40.178:-(ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Jul 26 1991 13:5612
    Re -1
    
    Read in yesterdays paper that the multiple tumors in Alzado's brain
    have shrunk considerably after his second chemo treatment, but the
    doctor warned that the success rate for treating this type of cancer
    was very low. It's hard to see such a powerful man being eaten up
    by an enemy he can't even see or fight back (physically) against,
    I just hope that the Lord would comfort him and his family and friends
    throughout this whole trajic ordeal.
    
    
    Carlos
40.179ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Jul 26 1991 19:4119
    Next on the draftee profiles is the Raiders eighth round pick...
    
    (219th player taken)
    Todd Woulard, LB, 6-1 230 Alabama A&M
    
    Agile and active linebacker who knows how to utilize quickness and
    strength to get to ball carrier ... Has shown brilliance as pass
    rusher ... Very athletic with excellent speed and lateral movement
    ... Earned Little All-American honors as senior after recording
    team-high 23 1/2 sacks ... Also recorded 59 total tackles and recovered
    one fumble in 1990 to earn Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Conference
    Defensive Player of the Year honors ... As a junior had a hand in
    62 stops to place third on team and registered team-high 10 1/2
    sacks, which placed him second in SIAC ... Also lettered in track
    and field as a javelin thrower ... Also lettered in basketball,
    baseball, and football in high school .
                                           
    
    Carlos
40.180BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jul 29 1991 15:014
    Is Marinovich hurt or just not ready to play yet?  I didn't see any of
    his stats in the box.
    
    Joe
40.181Did Montana even play?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jul 29 1991 16:042
      So did the ex-49'rs "tear" up there old team?  Maybe Lott putting the
    hurt on Rice?   Just curious.......
40.182from USA TOday..RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOPee Wee's wee-wee adventureMon Jul 29 1991 17:054
    Lott made one jarring tackle.  Craig rushed for 34 yards on 6 carries -
    but he also coughed the ball up once, leading to a Raiders' score.
    
    JD
40.183ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Jul 29 1991 18:0419
    >Craig rushed for 34 yards on 6 carries - but he also coughed the
    >ball up once, leading to a Raiders' score.
                                   ^
                                   |
                                   |
    Should read ----------------Niners' score. The final outcome was
    24-17 49'ers. I believe that Craig's 34 yards was the game high
    in rushing yardage for either team. Rookie Nick Bell rushed for
    14 yards on 4 carries (no biggie) and also, rookie TE Andrew Glover
    caught one pass for 8 yards. I haven't put Glover's profile in here
    yet, but I think that this guy's gonna turn out to be a starter
    within the next couple of years. The overall stats were pretty even
    except for the Raiders QB's got sacked ~5 times.....gotta sign
    Mosebar...and speaking of signing, Bob Golic signed this weekend
    just leaving Mosebar, and Scott Davis (I think?).
    
                                    
    Carlos   P.S. Funny personal_name JD.  I guess with a name like
                  Pee-Wee it's kinda hard to get a date.
40.184Not bad for a stiff...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Jul 29 1991 18:588
    Oh yeah, forgot to mention, for all you Schroeder bashers out there
    that I was reading through one of the pre-season football annual
    type magazines (can't remember which one?) and it said that Schroeder 
    was second only to Montana in most games won to lost ratio-when
    starting amongst all presently active QB's. Can't remember the exact 
    stats either though.....
    
    Carlos
40.185Did Evans retire yet?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jul 29 1991 21:2314
      re-1
    
      That could be true,  but remember that the faider defense won them
    alot of those games.  The QB win/loss stats can be deceptive.  I know
    you don't like Elway,  but look at how many games he and the offense
    scores 20+ points, and lose.  In other words,  Denvers "D" was lackin',
    when the offense was scoring.  Of course it goes both ways.
    
    
       Still bottom line, is most people feel that LA needs a "potent" QB. 
    I know that if they did,  they would be more consistent in the W
    column.  Beleive me,  I don't mind the inconsistency ;^^^
    
    		Tim
40.186ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Jul 30 1991 17:5921
    >                      -< Did Evans retire yet? >-
    
    No why? Is Denver looking for a more youthful QB? :-) Seriously
    though, he isn't listed on the rosters that I've got but he played
    last weekend. He's a good athelete and exciting to watch but he's
    not that good of a QB (IMHO), plus he's getting older. I don't think
    that, should the need arise, he could lead the team to the big dance
    and win it. I think perhaps 2nd string QB, Beuerlein, could do this,
    and I also think that Schroeder will do this. (hopefully this year)
    As for rookie Marinovich, I'll go along with what somebody else
    said about him, 'He can be as good as he wants, or he can throw
    it all away.' . As for what you said about 'if L.A. had a more potent
    QB they would win more games' (very loose paraphrase by me) , I
    think that this could just as truthfully be said about Montana or
    any other QB in the league. While I agree that a better QB would
    mean more 'consitent' wins, I 'll say that Schroeder did alot to
    improve last year and (again MHO) can no longer be labeled
    inconsistent. Besides, since when is 12-4 inconsistent? I'll agree
    too though that the defense had alot to do with 12-4.
    
    Carlos 
40.187DECXPS::KHARRISTue Jul 30 1991 19:239
    An article in the USA Today last week listed Marinovich as fourth
    string behind: Schroeder, Buerlien, and Evans. Unless they trade
    Buerlien, Ican't see Evans making the team. I agree with Carlos that is
    is just not that good of a QB. I would really like to see Moesbar sign
    before the next game.
    
    Lets hope that this year everyone doesn't get all worked up over the
    preseason like they did last year. It seemed like all the discussions
    in the notes file were about the importance of preseason games.
40.188CSC32::J_HERNANDEZROCKY DOESN'T GET IT!!!Thu Aug 01 1991 13:581
    Carlos, Schroeder got most of them wins as a 'skin
40.189ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Aug 01 1991 15:3423
    Re. -1  I'd be interested to know how his stats compare between
            starting for the 'Skins and starting for the Raiders.
            Maybe John Hendry or somebody else can help out? I'd bet 
            that the majority of his starts for the Raiders have been 
    	    wins.
    
      Here's a brief profile on the Raiders 9th round draft pick:
    
    (247th player taken)
    Tahaun Lewis, CB, 5-10, 175, Nebraska
    
    Exceptionally quick pass defender with fine leaping ability ...
    Has a decisive burst of speed in the open and displays sure hands
    for the interception ... Effective bump-and-run artist who rarely
    gives a receiver a big cushion ... Started nine games at right CB,
    recording 24 tackles with two interceptions, a pair of passes defensed,
    a fumble recovery for the Cornhuskers in 1990 ... All-Big Ten Honarable
    Mention as a junior after becoming starter at right CB ... Tied
    team record with eight passes deflected ... As a sophomore served
    as a nickel back in ten games ... lettered in track as a sprinter
    ... Also lettered in football, baseball, and track in high school.
    
    Carlos
40.190NU's not in the Big 10 yet (Hopefully never will be)BSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 01 1991 17:435
>    Tahaun Lewis, CB, 5-10, 175, Nebraska
>    ... All-Big Ten Honarable
>    Mention 
    
    I think you meant All-Big 8, Carlos.
40.191ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Aug 01 1991 19:5328
    Re -1 Oooops sorry, I guess you can tell that I'm not to much for
          college ball. I copied the article from a Raider News magazine
          and they had it as -Big 10. Oh well, here's another profile
          from a guy that I think is gonna turn out to be a star, he
          played last weekend against S.F. and made one reception, hoping
          to see him play against the Dolphins this weekend....
    
    Round 10
    (274th player chosen)
    Andrew Glover, TE, 6-6, 225, Grambling
    
    Tall, rangy target with soft hands, excellent jumping ability and
    speed for his size ... Versatile athlete who excelled in three sports
    at Grambling ... Not only played football but was a three-year starter
    at center in basketball and Southwestern Athletic Conference triple
    jump champion in track in both 1989 and 1990 ... Played in ten games
    as a senior, catching 10 passes for 246 yards and five touchdowns
    while splitting time between wide receiver and tight end ... Began
    to draw major attention in football as junior when, in NCAA playoff
    game against Stephen F. Austin, caught six passes for 211 yards
    and three touchdowns ... Averaged 22.2 yards per catch as junior
    on 17 receptions for 378 yards and eight touchdowns with career
    long of 73 yards ... Also lettered in football as sophomore, seeing
    action as reserve WR, and TE ... Earned all SWC in basketball as
    senior ... Also lettered in football, basketball, and track in high
    school.
    
    Carlos
40.192COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Aug 02 1991 17:548
      i thought you already mentioned a previous draft pick TE that would
    be a starter/star.  Of course you will let me know if I'm wrong.
    What about Mike Dial?  I thought you "praised" him last year.  He
    seemed to have good hands and was a "crowd" favorite.
    
      Just thought I would ask....
    
    		Tim
40.193ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Aug 02 1991 19:1215
    >What about Mike Dial?
    
    Mike Dyal was in the process of becoming one of the Leagues premier
    tight-ends (just ask any of the many FFL'ers who picked him), unfortunately
    he got injured and has not been much of a factor lately. I was
    expecting to see him challenge Horton for his starting job back
    again, but the Raiders recently put him on the physically unable
    to perform list (I think???) so it'll be a while if ever before
    we see him back again. In the mean time the Raiders got a good pickup
    (IMHO) in the 10th round in Glover.  I'm looking forward to seeing
    him, Nick Bell, and maybe even Marinovich play this weekend in Tokyo. 
    Wonder how Howie would do against some of them Sumo (?) wrestlers?
    Or even better, how some of them Sumo's would do on the line?
    
    Carlos
40.194Miami 19 Raiders 17ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Aug 05 1991 13:328
    Still no Marinovich ?? Wonder why..... Andrew Glover caught three
    passes for 10 yds and one TD, Nick Bell caught a dump off screen
    and turned it into 20 yds, he also rushed twice for 7 yds. Lott
    is definitely gonna make an impact this year, he was in on just
    about every defensive play that I saw (only watched the first half
    tho...). 
    
    Carlos
40.195BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 05 1991 17:3312
    Can't believe there was that much scoring late in the game.  I change
    over to SNL in the 3rd quarter with LA leading 7-6, then I turn back
    later just to catch the Faiders miss that long field goal at the end
    with the score 19-17.  
    
    I was impressed with old man Evans.  They should make him the starter
    :^).  I'll admit, Schroeder looked pretty good when he had the protection.  
    
    Sure seems odd that Todd "Coke" Marinovich hasn't seen any action.
    
    Joe
                                                                         
40.196Still pre-season bore....COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Aug 05 1991 18:4412
      Evans did look suprisingly good.  Buerlin was usually acurate.
    
      This had to have been the slopiest game I have seen in years.  What
    was the total penalties for both teams,  and also by team?  I would
    guess around 40 total flags thrown.  Maybe not all were counted after
    refusal,  but the game did seem to go on and on and on........
    
      The person that showed good potential was #58.  A linebacker.  He
    seemed to be all over the field and was pressuring the QB.  Whats this
    guys name Carlos?
    
         Tim
40.197ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Aug 05 1991 18:478
    Speaking of Schroeder, he came in third behind Marino, and DeBerg
    (I think??), this weekend in the NFL QB Challenge in Hawaii. 
    
    Also forgot to mention that in last weekends Fastest Man Competition,
    Ron Brown came in second in a photo finish to Daryl Green. Another
    Raider, Sam Graddy WR, was also a semi-finalist in this competition.
    
    Carlos
40.198?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Aug 05 1991 19:599
    >#58.....What's this guys name Carlos?
    
    Good question.....I didn't get to see most of the game so I really
    don't know who you're talking about. If he's a new guy tho' he's
    prabably gonna be Winston Moss, Todd Woulard, or Brian Jones. Do
    any of these guys ring a bell, if not I'll try to find out fer sure
    by tomorrow.
    
    Carlos
40.199ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Aug 06 1991 13:308
    >The person that showed good potential was #58. A linebacker. He
    >seemed to be all over the field and was pressuring the QB. What's
    >this guys name?
    
    #58 is A.J. Jimmerson. He was the Raiders eigth round draft choice
    last year. Glad to hear he's doing so well.
    
    Carlos
40.200COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Aug 06 1991 16:196
      #58 just seemed real aggressive.  Kinda like a Thomas or Taylor type. 
    Of course its pre-season.  I have noticed that some players for all teams
    will be this way just to make the team, but then when its time to
    perform during the season, they just seem to fade away...
    
    	Tim
40.201??NEST::PAPIATue Aug 06 1991 18:559
    
    	Anybody know what kind of injury Nick Bell got? they
    carried him off but I didn't hear anything about if it's
    serious or what.
    
    	The Raiders look real deep at all positions.
    
    
    Vinny
40.202CELTIK::JACOBBeer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38Tue Aug 06 1991 18:598
    
    >>	The Raiders look real deep at all positions.
    
    Is this in reference to football or "Kama Sutra"?????  (8^0*  (8^)*
    
    
    JaKe
    
40.203AnswerNEST::PAPIAWed Aug 07 1991 12:366
    
    	USA Today reports that Nick Bell has a badly pulled
    hamstring, out for probably a month.
    
    
    Vinny
40.204ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Wed Aug 07 1991 13:1810
    Ahhhh! that sucks...I was looking forward to him running over some
    people and now I gotta wait about a month. :-( Oh well, we still
    got Allen, Craig, G.Bell, Bo (?), Nappy, Smith, and Mueller. :-)
    
    The Raiders play the new and improved Cowgirls this coming Monday.
    I know it's only pre-season, but it still should be a good game
    to watch, especially after not seeing any football for the last
    few months.
    
    Carlos
40.205It won't matter..COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Aug 07 1991 20:109
      I was suprised at how big N. Bell is.  255lbs and stands tall to. 
    But he didn't seem to have speed,  at least on the few plays that i saw
    him carry.
    
      Carlos,  not all those rbs will make the team.  Mueller and Mccallum
    are probably gone.  Greg Bell might be gone to.  He just hasn't looked
    like the Greg bell of Rams days.
    
      Tj
40.206ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Aug 08 1991 14:2523
    >Mueller and McCallum are probably gone.
    
    It would probably be better for them if they were gone anyhow, because
    they're good athletes, but with guys like Allen, Craig, Bo, and
    the old and new Bells, I don't think they'd ever get a chance to
    play except maybe on special teams and stuff like that.
    
    OK, last but not least on the Raider draft profiles is:
    
    Round 12
    (330th player taken)
    Dennis Johnson, WR/CB, 6-1 200lbs., Winston-Salem
    
    Big, strong athlete with excellent speed, quickness and ability
    to go to the ball, whether it's on offense or defense ... Versatile
    athlete who played WR, RB, CB, and free and strong safety at
    Winston-Salem while earning three letters ... Had a hand in 18 tackles
    and recorded 3 passes defensed as a senior ... Also had one tackle
    behind the line of scrimmage ... Lettered in track at Winston-Salem,
    competing in 100 and 200-meters and a member of 400-meter relay
    team ... Lettered in football and basketball in high  school.
    
    Carlos
40.207Talk about rose colored glassesTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Thu Aug 08 1991 17:208
I love those profiles.  According them every draft pick is a great athlete, 
great ability, etc.  Just once I'd like to read one that says "...No shot at 
making the team, chosen only to fill out draft round..."  8^)

Nothing personal Carlos,or the Raiders, all the profiles for all the teams are
the same.

=Bob=
40.208CAM::WAYCall her up on the spank lineThu Aug 08 1991 17:3811
>I love those profiles.  According them every draft pick is a great athlete, 


Hell, my profile said that I've got 4.9 speed, I can pass block like a maniac,
and I can run block like theres no tomorrow....

In reality, Rich Gedman would give me some stiff competition in a foot race,
and I can't block to save my life...

8^)

40.210ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Aug 08 1991 18:278
    =Bob=, pretty funny huh? I noticed that too, they all sound like
    they're ready for the Pro-Bowl. 
    
    In yesterdays paper there was a picture of Bo, and it said that
    he's been practicing with real pitchers and stuff, good news, hopefully
    we'll see Bo back by next season, maybe even this one????
    
    Carlos
40.211CAM::WAYCall her up on the spank lineThu Aug 08 1991 18:3611
>    In yesterdays paper there was a picture of Bo, and it said that
>    he's been practicing with real pitchers and stuff, good news, hopefully

I practice with real pitchers all the time.  

No good using those virtual pitchers cause the beer keeps falling out.....


hth,
'saw

40.212DECWET::METZGERPennant race in Seattle ?Thu Aug 08 1991 23:2711
I wonder if Bo is dumb enough to ever go back to playing football? He's a great
athlete and I'm glad to see him back on the road to recovery but he's got to
realize now that he's got a higher chance of getting a double career ending 
injury playing football.

Personally I think his football career is through....


Metz
 
40.213Will Cowgirls beat the FAiders tonight?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Aug 12 1991 18:216
      I agree with Metz.  Why jeapordize both careers and possibly your
    health, or hip in this case?  He could end up with permanant damage. 
    He is rich, so money shouldn't be an issue.  Don't let your "big ego"
    get in the way Bo.
    
      Tim
40.214ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Aug 13 1991 14:1414
    >             -< Will Cowgirls beat the Faiders tonight? >-
    
    
    	Nope! The Raiders win their first pre-season game over the 
    Cowboys, 17-12. The Cowboys are looking pretty good, 'specially 
    that Emmitt guy. The Raiders looked like they did last year, except
    a little rustier. Schroeder did pretty good, I think he's gonna
    have another good year. Marinovich scored his first NFL touchdown,
    and did a whole lot of handing off. The defense just needs a little
    bit of fine tuning, and it wouldn't hurt any if Davis got his butt
    back into camp. They've got two more pre-season games to get the
    bugs out, but I think they'll be ready in time for Houston.
          
    Carlos
40.215Ellison S@#KS!!!CSLALL::KHARRISTue Aug 13 1991 15:5414
    Schroeder played well when given the time to throw the ball. The
    offensive line did not look good. Rory Graves, after making so much
    progress last year, played like sh@t! As a team, their run blocking was
    terrible! Come on Al lets sign Moesbar!!!! Anthony Smith, last years #1
    played well. Aarron Wallace was invisable. Nolan Harrison played well
    in limited action. Why is Ricky Ellison still allowed to guard
    somebody. Winston Moss or Ronnie Lott should have been assigned to
    Novacek and maybe he wouldn't have caught so many passes!
    
    Dallas looke real good on the defensive line. I've read so much about
    Alexander Wright running a 4.1  40 but they didn't attempt to get him
    the ball. Jack Del Rio played like a man possed at middle LB. Send him
    to the Raiders so we can stop watching Riki Ellison have runners cut
    back on him all game.
40.216COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Aug 13 1991 15:5910
      We will see how good the man-man coverage is for the Faiders. 
    Houston uses that run n shoot, which means 4 wide outs.  If the man to
    man fails,  then moon & co will eat the defenses lunch.   I'm not sure
    of the soilers defense.  I remember them being inconsistant last year, 
    so who knows how they  will handle schreoder & co.
    
      I missed last nights game,  so I can back up/dispute what Carlos
    said.  To bad.....
    
       Tim
40.217ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Aug 13 1991 16:1828
    >The offensive line did not look good.....Come on Al lets sign
    >Mosebar!!!
    
     
    I agree Kenn, the biggest problem for the Raiders so far is the
    offensive line, but like you mentioned Mosebar wasn't there, and
    neither was Wisnieski (sp?), these guys were pro-bowlers last year
    and they're gonna have to start playing if the Raiders are gonna
    improve the situation on the o-line. 
    
    >Aaron Wallace was invisible.
    
    I noticed that too, was he playing????
    
    Ronnie Lott is an excellent addition to the Raiders, he's already
    putting on the hits and it's only pre-season. 
    
    >Nolan Harrison played well in limited action.
    
    I seen him smother E. Smith close to the line of scrimmage after
    Emmitt tryed to cut and slipped a little. Nolan should get better
    with more experience.
    
    >                        -< Ellison S@#KS!!! >-
    
    In pass coverage anyhow, but he's good against the run. IMHO
    
    Carlos
40.218Mosebar Signs!!!!!!CSLALL::KHARRISWed Aug 14 1991 10:136
    The Raiders finally signed Mosebar yesterday, which should solidify
    their OL situation. The Raiders also traded Vencie Glenn (signed during
    the plan B period) to Phoenix for a player to be named later.
    
    
    Kenn
40.219Who's running with the Raiders?ROULET::LAFOUNTAINEWed Aug 14 1991 10:403
    Has anyone heard whether the Raiders are going to go with Marcus
    or one of the other backs this Year?
                             Kevin
40.220O L will be OK!NEST::PAPIAWed Aug 14 1991 12:558
    
       OT Bruce Wilkerson was playing with the second team because
    he just signed, that means 3 of the Raiders best linemen did
    not start (2 were not even there). They still didn't look that
    bad against a very good defense line.
    
    
    Vinny
40.221ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Wed Aug 14 1991 13:4415
    >                 -< Who's running with the Raiders? >-
    
    
    Kevin, Marcus Allen will probably be considered the #1 guy but I'm
    sure that he will be sharing alot of the running duties with Craig.
    The Raiders 2nd round draft pick, Nick Bell, was looking real good
    too, until he pulled a ham string but I think that once he recovers
    we'll be seeing him get the ball quite a bit, along with possibly
    Greg Bell. So in answer to your question, there really isn't one
    go-to guy, but I think the majority of it will be done by both Allen
    and Craig.  HoH.
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.222HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxes!Fri Aug 16 1991 15:2113
    From todays Glob:
    
       A bank robber in Sacramento, Ca., who netted about $25,000 during a
    10-week spree, said he pulled the 2 dozen heists in part to finance
    trips to Los Angeles Raiders football games.
       "The only time I could relax and enjoy myself was when I went to the
    games," Claude Jones, 32, wrote in a letter to Judge David F. Levi
    prior to sentencing. "The Raiders were winning, and I began to believe
    that I was helping them by attending the games. I believed that if I
    didn't go, they would lose."
       Jones was sentenced to nearly 10 years in federal prison and fined
    $5,593.
                                            Denny
40.223ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Aug 16 1991 18:526
    Re. -1     Talk about fan-atics, sheesh!
    
    
    The Raiders play the Bears tommorrow. Wonder if it'll be televised?
    
    Carlos
40.224Raiders CutsCSLALL::KHARRISWed Aug 21 1991 09:4212
    The Raiders trimmed down to 60 players yesterday by cutting the
    following players: DB Marcus Wilson, DE Emanuel King, DE Malcom
    Showell, DT Tim Rother, LB Bruce Klostermann, LB Tim Cofield, OG
    Jeff Grimes, RB Charles Young, RB Doug Lloyd, WR Darrel Hopper, WR
    Keith Wright, and WR Stefon Adams.Placed RB Greg Bell OL Todd Peat on
    thewaivered-injured list. DT Mike Wise was placed on the reserve-left
    camp list. They traded TE Bob Tyler to the Colts for an undisclosed
    draft pick. With Wise leaving and Davis out of camp, it looks like
    Nolan Harrison has a good chance of making the team.
    
    
    Kenn
40.225Davis Signs!CSLALL::KHARRISThu Aug 22 1991 10:304
    The Raiders signed DE Scott Davis Yesterday. There is a good article on
    Tim Browns return from knee surgery in the USA Today.
    
    Kenn
40.226Just Win Baby, Just WinROYALT::FORGETLA Raiders #1Mon Aug 26 1991 12:066
    
    
      Raiders beat the Bears on Friday and i heard last Night that the 
    Raiders trade QB Steve Buerlin (sp) to the Cowboys.
    
    Mike
40.227Hope they got a #1 pick for Beuerlein.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Aug 26 1991 14:169
    The Raiders did indeed beat the Bears two Fridays ago, and they
    won the Chargers this Saturday 17-7. They traded Beuerlein to the
    Cowboys for an undisclosed draft pick in 1992, and they also traded
    Newt Harrell, guard, to the Browns for another undisclosed draft
    choice. Beuerlein should replace Stoudt as the 'boys #2 QB, they're
    doing a heck of a rebuilding job down in Dallas and the 'boys are
    gonna be tough to beat pretty soon...
    
    Carlos
40.228Raider CutsCSLALL::KHARRISTue Aug 27 1991 13:4810
    To trim thier roster to 47 , the Raiders cut the following players:
    QB Vince Evans, LB's Jerry Robinson & Brian Jones, KR Ron Brown,
    DB's Dennis Johnson & Derrick Cudrup, DL Mike Charles, OL's Josh
    Taotoai & Rich Stephens, TE Greg Harrell, and WR Mike Alexander.
    
    I'm sure Evans will be picked up as soon as they put someone on IR.
    
    
    
    Kenn
40.229ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Wed Aug 28 1991 14:5210
    >I'm sure Evans will be picked up as soon as they put someone on
    >IR.
    
    The Raiders placed RB's Vance Mueller and Nick Bell, and DL Roy
    Hart on IR and picked up Evans, Robinson, and Cudrup.
    
    The Raiders start the season off this weekend against Houston's
    high powered run-and-shoot offense. 
    
    
40.230Carlos must be out sick today :^)BSS::JCOTANCHHouston 47, Faiders 17!Tue Sep 03 1991 14:511
    
40.231COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Sep 03 1991 20:558
      re-1
    
      It is quite today;^   Will the faiders be flat again on sunday?  I
    hhope so,  but I'm sure Uncle al and Artie have told them a thing or 2
    by now,  and since it is a rival team they are playing,  well it should
    be interesting.
    
         Tim
40.232Uncle Al; He's reall Not A Nice Guy !QUASER::HUNTERBronco's #1 in Boomer's BookWed Sep 04 1991 18:118
    
    
     I think there just getting ready for the big GAG come next Sunday !
    The Donks are gonna show those happless faiders what footballs all
    about.  It sure was nice to see the real Jay Schrader (SP?) back.
    I can't beleive that guy's still starting.
    
    Big Game
40.233Let's see how many Donk fans show up in here Monday!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Sep 06 1991 14:2612
    Re to the last couple, c'mon you guys, you're acting like the Donks
    have never been blown away. As far as the Oilers game goes.....
    ...sheesh....two blowouts in a row, I don't know if my heart can
    handle much more of this stuff. Marcus is out for about six weeks
    and Craig will be filling in for him this weekend against the Donks.
    Marcus blames his knee injury on the Astro-turf, and I agree with
    him, that junk should be made illegal! I'm looking forward to Sundays
    game and I don't think (???) it'll be another repeat performance.
    If the real Schroeder and the real Elway show up, it should be the
    Raiders game easily :-)
    
    Carlos
40.234Welcome Cacti and Carlos..it was getting to quiteCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Sep 06 1991 19:2617
      How come it took you soooooo long to say anything about LAST weeks
    game Carlos?
    
      I will be here Monday regarless of the outcome.  It won't take me 5
    days to say something.
    
      I think it will be the typical donk faider game.
    
      Weakness'   
    
    		  Faiders = QB  & LB's
                  Broncos = Left side OL and Wymon Henderson and maybe
    		  Treadwell.  He slumped last year,  last week wasn't
    		  immpressive.
    
    
       Tim
40.235.500ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Sep 09 1991 14:319
    >I think it will be the typical donk faider game.
    
    It was. As per usual, a field goal was the difference although I
    think the game was not as close as the score indicates. The Raiders
    offense didn't show up in the first half, good thing the defense
    did, they held the Donks to 6 points. The second half was all Raiders,
    just like old times huh Tim.
    
    Carlos
40.236Classic!!!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Sep 09 1991 16:595
      Yes Carlos,  and as I said in the donk file,  nov.10th won't be any
    different....I like these kind of games, with the exception of who won
    this one.....
    
    	Tj
40.237The QB is a weak linkOURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZTue Sep 10 1991 15:4910
The Raiders are not supporting Jay Schroeder at all. Art Shell is playing 
protective father and praying that he doesn't blow it. The team is full of guys 
that can run fly patterns. They need Mike Dial back, it was very evident that 
the Raiders do not have a receiver willing to catch a Schroeder thrown football 
over the middle. 

It's much too early to start screaming for Marinovich he hasn't taken the 
pacifier out of his mouth yet. 

Jeff
40.238Uncle Al's a Mobster..... I saw him with Gambino!QUASER::HUNTERBronco's #1 in Boomer's BookWed Sep 11 1991 12:344
    The Faids got luckey and beat Donks by 3 $%^%^&^&*) points.  
    I got $$$$ that say the donks finish with a better overall 
    record than the happless Faiders unless the bench wrong way
    Jay. Good game Faids see ya in Nov.
40.239Raiders = 2-1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Sep 13 1991 19:4415
    The Raiders face the AFC's #1 defense (so far) this weekend when
    they play the Colts. The Colts offense hasn't been doing too much
    yet, but with a QB like George and an RB like Dickerson they can't
    be taken to litely. I expect another close one this weekend with
    the Raiders winning by a TD or so.  
    
    Bo Jackson said that if his doctors clear him to play football,
    he'll be getting his guts knocked out or knocking somebody else's
    guts out after baseball season. After seeing him run 'though, I
    don't think it's a good idea just yet, I think he should wait until
    next season at least....
    
    
    Carlos
    
40.240ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Sep 20 1991 14:2111
    The Raiders play the Atlanta (wanna-be-raider) Falcons this weekend,
    should be interesting to see what kind of tricks old Glanville (sp?)
    has up his sleeve. The Donks are keeping pace with the Raiders so
    far, but I think the Chargers will win there first game in an upset
    in Denver (probably more wishfull thinking than anything, but it
    could happen). Looks like the Raiders are returning to last years
    form, especially on defense, now if we could just get a few more
    TD's from Schroeder and co.
    
    Carlos
    
40.241COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Sep 20 1991 15:149
      Atlanta has a fairly good defense.  I watched them play KC in game 1, 
    and they were pressuring the QB every play.  Atlanta seems to be close
    in every game, no matter who they are playing.  I don't think this will
    be any different.
    
      Who ever wins the war in the trenches will win this game. 
    Unfortunately I think the faids will win,  but you never know......
    
    	Tim
40.242Jay.... You Shoulda Stuck to BaseaballQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderMon Sep 23 1991 18:439
    
     HA !!!  I love it....  The "Wanna-Be-Raiders" looked more like the
    Raiders than the Raiders Did.....  I'm telling you, and you can quote
    me on this....  The Raiders will go no where until they dump Wrong Way
    Jay and get themselves a REAL QB......  I think I saw an article in 
    S.I. that said Plunket want's to come out of retirement and Play for
    the Raiders....  If I were Uncle Al Davis I'd seriously consider giving
    him a try out, He's got to be better the Wrong Way Jay.  Hell, I'm 
    better than Wrong Way Jay, Ain't that right COMET::JACKSONTA
40.243COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Sep 23 1991 21:317
      Better than Jay, Jack?  I don't know,  you can throw thee short ones, 
    but he can throw the long ones.
    
      From what I heard, Jay threw an int at the end of the game on
    Atlanta's 20.  Any conformation?
    
    Tim
40.244COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Sep 24 1991 14:093
      Where is Carlos?   Every time the Faids lose,  he disappers,  kinda
    like Hal;^
    	Tim
40.245Get it right will ya?GENRAL::WADETue Sep 24 1991 15:279
    
    Tim,
    
    	I've noticed a trend in your notes that is probably of concern
    	to all ::SPORTS noters........... you haven't mastered the
    	smiley face thang!  You either tack on two noses or leave the
    	mouth totally off.  Cut down on the SportsShrooms(tm) OK?
    
    Claybroon 8*)
40.246c=vacation Good-Bye for the WAD!!!QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderWed Sep 25 1991 20:175
    
    
     Clay Wad.....  You're a Bone Haid....
    
    	Big Game
40.247ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Wed Sep 25 1991 21:047
    The Raiders got smoked by the wanna-be's, ....but their still only
    a game behind the Donks. They play the Montana-less 49'ers this
    weekend, should be a good game to watch. I think the Raiders will
    take it (no bias here), they always seem to play tough against the
    good teams and choke against the one's the should smoke.
    
    Carlos
40.248PEACHS::MITCHAMAndy in AtlantaWed Sep 25 1991 23:2510
>       <<< Note 40.247 by ELMAGO::CGRIEGO "Even so, come, Lord Jesus." >>>
>
>    I think the Raiders will
>    take it (no bias here), they always seem to play tough against the
>    good teams and choke against the one's the should smoke.
    
    The 49ers and Falcons are currently tied.  So who's the good team and
    who's the one they should smoke? 
    
-Andy
40.249Sorry Raiders....49ers < .500 wont happen againMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Sep 26 1991 11:277
    This Game will come down to Luck, the team that makes (recovers) the
    turnover early in the 4rth qtr will score and hold and win the game.
    
    Hope its the Raiders but the 49ers wont slip back under .500
    
    		49ers 24	Raiders 16
    								Mike
40.250Faids lose again?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Sep 27 1991 21:024
      Gee thanks Clay......8**********   I never knew what these stupid
    signs meant,  so I kinda wanged it;^?
    
    	T
40.251Donks slurp....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Oct 01 1991 19:5810
    Raiders beat the 49'ers this weekend 12-6, it was kind of a boring
    game to watch tho' with a grand total of six field goals accounting
    for all the scoring. The Raiders 'D' is playing good, but the offense
    still ain't got much of a clue. One of the bright spots on offense
    was Nick Bell returning from a knee injury, he can run and catch
    very well and he's only gonna get better as the season goes on.
    Now if they could only get their rookie QB going.....
    
    
    Carlos
40.252Thanks for choking Schroeder & co.COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Oct 07 1991 15:151
      Sure is quiet in here anymore.
40.253ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Oct 08 1991 16:2516
    >               -< Thanks for choking Schroeder & co. >-
    
    I think you should omit Schroeder from this statement, the S.D.
    loss was not Schroeder's fault. He actually looked pretty sharp
    this weekend (although I only saw the last half of the game).
    I think Roger (cough it up) Craig, and Willy (all thumbs) Gault
    are more to Blam (tm) than anybody. Schroeder hasn't been playing
    up to last years par though,........but there's still alot more
    games coming up for him (and the rest of the team) to get it together.
    They could sure use a wake up call right about now, especially with
    Seattle coming up......the only way they'll win the division again
    is by beating other division rivals and right now they are 1-1 in
    that department. Oh well, at least they'll win one more with their
    annual sweep of the donks.....:-)
    
    Carlos
40.254A week off means Carreker comes backCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Oct 08 1991 20:4411
      I didn't see much of that game either,  but I remember watching a
    highlite on ESPN? and they showed Fernandez? wide open for the bomb, 
    and Jay overthrew him by 5+ yards. Normally the QB gets most of the
    blame when "not enough" points are scored.  Didn't Jay have 1-2 int's?
    
      WE will see about the sweep buzzzzz.  Barring injuries,  I think the
    Broncos will have a good season with winning all the home games;^^
    
      
    
        Tim
40.255COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Oct 09 1991 19:421
      Mike Wise DL was dumped by Faiders yesterday.
40.256BSS::JCOTANCHSeachickens &amp; Blue Jays are Chokers!Mon Oct 14 1991 12:0923
    Well, Seattle should no longer be the Seachickens -  they should be
    the SeaChokes!  Here's a team with quite possibly the best home-field
    advantage in the NFL and they not only make a close game out of a 17-0
    lead but lose the game!  Damm idiots!!  No wonder I hate 'em.  
    
    It would've been much worse at halftime but I see now how terrible of a
    QB Kemp is.  He makes Pat Ryan look like Joe Montana.  His int. right 
    before half really hurt Seattle.  This was a big win for the Faids
    though like they said after the game.  And when the f%#&ing hell are
    teams gonna learn to just blitz the hell out of Schroeder?!?  Put alot
    of heat on him, make him hurry his throws, hit him a few times and get
    him rattled!  At least Roger "I fumble" Craig is in midseason form. 
    
    What's the deal with the people of Seattle?  I thought this was Seahawk
    country all the way, some of the best fans in the NFL, and every time
    they scan the crowd I see a bunch of "I (think) I'm cool because I wear 
    black" Faider fans.  Come on Seattle, show some pride for your beloved
    team and not the damm enemy!!!!!  And keep those Faider fans out of your 
    Kingdome!
    
    
    Joe
    
40.257CAM::WAYParty on, GarthMon Oct 14 1991 12:1814
Joe,

When I saw Kemp drop back on that last pass in OT, I picked up the
phone and made airline reservations.  If I on the East Coast knew who
he was throwing too, I'm sure every DB anywhere west of the Mississippi
did too.  If he'd have taken just a little longer to release the ball,
I might have made the inty and not Lott 8^)

(If he'd have waited to release a second more, Lott might have scored a TD...)

Boy, does he suck as a QB.


'Saw
40.258AFC West is starting to look interestingANGLIN::KIRKMANWhat a WONDERFUL honeymoonMon Oct 14 1991 12:299
    I don't get a chance to watch many Seahawks games, but what I have
    seen, they are everything I dislike about conservative coaching. 
    
    Everytime the Seahawks get a lead, the coaching staff sits on the ball. 
    Get real, this is the NFL where the offenses can score points.  Throw
    the ball (at least occationally, when the running game isn't working),
    or you deserve to lose.  The offensive play calling lost this game.
    
    Commander Scott
40.259Kemp kills Hawks..same old, same old...DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingMon Oct 14 1991 17:0128
I was at the game last night and it was typical chuck knox and Jeff Kemp. He is 
one bad QB...Even roborookie McGwire would be better than Kemp. Every time he 
went back to pass in a critical situation you knew he was gong to throw an Int.

The game was bad for a few reasons. First the Chicken Hawks lost, second, there
was a ton of obnoxious Raider fans at the game (It seemed like every two bit
punk looking kid there was a raider fan), and lastly I didn't have any binoculars
to watch the SeaGals with (but I managed to borrow a pair for their end zone
dance :-)

Massively conservative play calling killed the Hawks. On the defensive side the
lack of any sort of a pass rush killed them. The 'hawks need to spend their first
round choice this year on a speed pas rusher.

17-0 (it should have been 24-0) at the half and 0 offense in the 2nd half. They
had one offensive play in the 2nd half that got them a field goal but that was
it.


I've never seena game with more replay reviews either....it really stretches
that game out with TV timeouts and replays and more timeouts and ugh....


Activate Krieg or play Roborookie....


Metz
40.260Faids get luckyCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Oct 14 1991 17:3813
      I saw this game,  and the reason Knox is conservative is because his
    QB stinks!  Its hard to want to pass if you know that out of every 10
    pass att that at least 1 of those will be picked.
    
      Give the game ball to Lott.  He made a critical 3rd down stop on
    Williams in the 4th? and then the int in OT.
    
      This was one of the sloppiest games every.  Faids = 5 turnovers in
    1st half,  and 'chickens choke in second.
    
      How many flags were thrown?  30+ is my guess.
    
    	Tim
40.261CAM::WAYParty on, GarthMon Oct 14 1991 18:0615
So Metz....

By my calculations, you guys are done with football for the day at around
8pm.  Last nights game ended at 11pm my time.

What's up after that?  A late dinner in some of the fine eateries near
the kingdome?  Not much area for tailgating there, so I figure you have
to eat out.

Or just heading home....

What does a typical Seattle fan do?


'Saw
40.262RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOHi-OO Silver, AwaaayyyyMon Oct 14 1991 18:138
    Saw -
    
    A typical Seattle fan climbs into the Winnebago and drives back to
    wherever they came from, saying "Awww shucks, and stuff..."
    
    Other typical Seattle fans go out binging, eh.
    
    JD
40.263The typical Seattle Sunday...DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingMon Oct 14 1991 18:2722
Not being typical in any way,shape or form and having most excellent weather (43
consecutive days without precipitation) this "Hawks fan got up early and did a
benefit walk around Green Lake, went out to brunch, hung out around green lake
and read the paper and watched the badaciousness skate,walk,ride by and then
went to the game which started at 4:30 PST.

Watched the game and then headed home because of the long day. Because the 
Kingdome parking situation is absolutely outta control the Mrs. and I didn't
get home 'till 10:00. A quick screening of the previous nights Almost Live
and a part of Saturday Night Live and it's off to bed to rest up for the 
long work week....

Had it been an early game tailgating or dinner out would have been in the
works....

Quite the large contingent of winnebago people that must drive from all over
the state to see the ChickenHawks.....not quite the same crowd as M's games.

I predict Kemp goes on the waiver wire this week after Krieg gets activated.

Metz
40.264ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Oct 14 1991 20:0211
    Another great come from behind victory for the Raiders.
    I don't think I've ever seen so many flags thrown in one game, it
    seems like they threw a flag after every single play. The officiating
    for this game really sucked, for example the 'too many men on the
    field' ruling after the Seahawk kickoff that 'Toast' returned for
    a TD after it went into the endzone without a Seahawk player touching
    it or a Raider player signaling for a fair catch. What a rip, or
    how about the Howie fumble recovery.
    
    Carlos
    
40.265DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingMon Oct 14 1991 21:3113
You knew that the refs weren't going to allow a td on that play. Even if it 
was a vlid one. They were caught with egg on face syndrome. The local paper 
here even aid that the Raider player warned the officials before the game
that he would try this if the 'Hawks were napping on a punt or kickoff....

Metz

PS - the raider player should have let his teammates know he was going to try
this then they would have stayed off the field. As it was it sort of was the
correct call because both teams had people on the field that weren't part of
the original play.....

40.266Why are Bronco fans so concerned about the Raiders?AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopTue Oct 15 1991 13:181
    
40.267ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Oct 15 1991 13:589
    >    -< Why are Bronco fans so concerned about the Raiders? >-
    
    Why ask why? Drink Bud Dry......Seriously tho' If you'd be beat
    up by the same big'ol bully year after year, you'd be concerned
    about his well being too! Ain't that right Tim? Besides the Donks
    know that if they're gonna have any chance of winning the division
    they're gonna need some outside help wif da Raiders. :-)
    
    Carlitos
40.268CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 14:007
    Da Raiders are toast.  Whoever wins this week betwixt the Chiefs and
    the Donkeys will win the division.  Raiders will only be able to hope
    for a wild-card, at best.
    
    
    JaKe
    
40.269I Love The Donks But I Like My Money More !! QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderTue Oct 15 1991 17:5814
     The Faiders have a lot of talent and have had for a few years now.
    They have one glaring problem that will keep them from winning like
    they did in the days of old, WRONG WAY JAY !!!  Until they give the 
    bum his walking papers they won't worry the Semi-Happless Donks or
    anyother team in the league.  Theres a saying about old JAY arong the 
    Rockies and is goes like this "As long as Jay's around He'll keep the
    Faiders down".  I gotta say that the trade with the Skins were the gave
    up Lachey (SP?) for Wrong Way Jay was the biggest mistake I've ever
    seen Uncle Al Davis make!  I gotta agree with JaKe.....  Who ever
    wins the game this Sunday wins the division
    
    Big Game 
    
    P.S.  I'm Picking The Cheifs !!
40.270DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingTue Oct 15 1991 19:3217

ESPN reported rumors that the Raiders were thinking about benching Jay after his
dismal 1st half. Lucky for him he pulled off the comeback and bought himself a
little more time before Marinovich becomes the QB.

Nick bell loooked good this week. He doesn't look especially fast, no punishing
but he reads his blocks well and finds the hole. He runs pretty straight up
for a big guy. 

Roger Craig is through. He might still step high but he's very slow in getting 
to the hole and extremely easy to knock down. he'll be gone after this year....

When's Marcus coming back ?


Metz
40.27117135::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Wed Oct 16 1991 12:2117
    > When's Marcus coming back?
    
    I think Marcus Allen will be seeing some action this weekend against
    the Rams. Just in time too, the Raiders sure miss him, Nick Bell
    is getting better each week but he can't do it by himself. Wonder
    where Greg Bell's at? Roger Craig isn't all washed up yet just ask
    the Donks, Craig had a good day against them and he's been pretty
    good in other games too except he has a very bad habit of coughing
    the ball up at the worst possible moments and it's been hurting
    the team, he needs to work on hanging on to the ball. The Raiders
    need to start utilizing Craig's receiving skills too, he's one of
    the most dangerous running back receivers coming out of the backfield.
    I expect the Raiders to have a good day against the Rams this weekend.
    
    Raiders by 10 or more!
    
    Carlitos
40.272Probably no Baby Snake action this year?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Oct 17 1991 12:2014
    In answer to my own question: "Wonder where Greg Bell's at?", I
    did a search on his name and Kenn entered a reply a few weeks ago
    saying that he had been placed on the waived-due to injury list.
    
    I was reading my latest copy of Raider News yesterday and I noticed
    that Marinovich cannot play for the Raiders unless Schroeder, and
    Evans both go down (with injuries), and if this does happen and
    Baby Snake (tm) stinks up the place neither Schroeder or Evans can
    come back into the game. It has something to do with him being the
    46th player on the roster. So I guess this means we probably won't
    be seeing him in action this year, but you can bet he'll be challenging
    the others for the #1 position next year. Go Schroeder!
    
    Carlitos
40.273Is he injured?GEMVAX::HILLThu Oct 17 1991 13:2215
    Not that I'm really up on this sort of thing, so please excuse my
    ignorance if it's obvious, but... Wasn't Marinovich a first or early 
    round pick? He's been hyped quite a bit, going back to his pushy
    overbearing dad trying to "make" him into the "perfect QB".
    
    Anyway, the idear that he may not see any action this year seems kind
    of strange, unless he's injured. I usually thought that a 1st round
    pick is a guy who can come in and make an immediate impact. The other
    early round picks are guys who can contribute in their first year, but
    may nor start. I realize that they may be bringing him along slowly,
    like Testaverde was, but it seems like he should be getting some time
    in there. Also, didn't they pay him a ton of money? Might as well play
    the guy...
    
    Tom 
40.274STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesThu Oct 17 1991 13:428
    re .273:
    
    > Wasn't Marinovich a first or early round pick?
    
    Marinovich was the Raiders first round pick, 24th overall in the draft.
    
    
    py
40.275BSS::JCOTANCHGo Air Force - Stun the Irish!Thu Oct 17 1991 14:119
    
>    I usually thought that a 1st round
>    pick is a guy who can come in and make an immediate impact. 
 
    Usually not the case with QB's.
    
    
    Joe
    
40.276AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopThu Oct 17 1991 14:131
    	...and certainly not the case with this year's crop.
40.277CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 17 1991 14:311
    I didn't know redshirting existed in the NFL.
40.278ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Oct 17 1991 16:1918
  >>Re. .273                  -< Is he injured? >-
    
    Hey Tom, 
    
    It's not that he's physically unable to perform, it's just another
    of those beautiful new rules/regulations things the NFL dreams up 
    when they get bored. I'm not to sure exactly how it works other
    than what I said in .272, but it has something to do with him being
    the 46th player on the roster or something like that. I guess last
    year and before that you could only have 45 players (is this right????)
    and this year teams are allowed 46, with conditions for that player.
                                                                       
    Maybe somebody whose up on the rules could shed some light?
    
    
    Carlitos
     
    
40.279Bench The BumQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderThu Oct 17 1991 17:247
    
     I'm not up on the rules to that depth but I beleive you're right.
    I can only say that the should have Jay hit the pine and play the
    second stringer instead....  Any things got to be better for the
    faiders than wrong way Jay !!
    
    		Big Game
40.280ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Oct 17 1991 18:079
    A few times I can remember thinking the same things about Schroeder
    (e.g. Bench the Bum! and stuff) but he's really not that bad, the
    Raiders have won a lot more than they've lost with Jay at the wheel.
    It might be because of the rest of the team, but many of them were
    around when Marc Wilson was the QB and the Raiders were batting
    .500 or less, Jay's 100% better than Wilson and I'd rather have
    him in there and the Raiders winning (no matter how ugly it looks)
    than take a chance ending up with another Wilson clone.
         
40.281COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Oct 17 1991 18:1611
      Jack,  I can't beleive you would want the faiders to bench Schreoder. 
    The division will be locked up by Denver or KC with Jay playing, I mean
    losing games for LA.
    
      I wouldn't exactly say Jay made a second half come back for LA.  Its
    more like the seachickens couldn't find they're offense if it was in
    front of they're face.   Now that Kemps gone,  the seagulls will
    probably be more competative.
    
    
    	Tim
40.282DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingThu Oct 17 1991 18:228
Jay-bone is only as good as his offensive line. If you give him time to throw 
he does a pretty reasonable job at finding the open receiver.

Under pressure (any sort) is a completely different story


Metz
40.283PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Thu Oct 17 1991 18:3711
    
>>(any-QB) is only as good as his offensive line. If you give him time to throw 
>>he does a pretty reasonable job at finding the open receiver.

>>Under pressure (any sort) is a completely different story
    
    Metz, 
    these statements can be said about almost any QB, including Brister!!!
    
    JaKe
    
40.284Hey Big Game The Donks S__K!!!!!!CNTROL::CHILDSSay GoodBye to Freedom 1984 is here!!!Thu Oct 17 1991 19:197
 I believe the rule states that you can carry 46 players only if the
 46 th player is your 3rd string QB and he can only be used in the game
 if you first 2 Qb's get injuried...

 mike    

40.285Only if he is your third string QB, and the others get hurt, and it is a Thursday night game and...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPThu Oct 17 1991 21:2912
re: .1

Now there's another brilliant NFL rule for you!

re: Marinovitch

The other thing to remember about the guy is that he left school early.  This 
season is really the equivilant of his senior (?) year of college.  While I'd
love to see him play and succeed for the reasons we discussed in August, I can
understand him spending this year on the bench.

=Bob=
40.286Better than wrong way Jay and the Faids any dayQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderFri Oct 18 1991 11:586
     Hey Mikey !!!!  The Donks don't S__K near as bad as the Faiders !!
    I'm gonna take $20.00 from HOOT this year on a bet the the Donks 
    finish ahead of the Faiders in the AFC West...... Care to lose some
    of you hard earned money as well???
    
    Big Game
40.287TGIFCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Oct 18 1991 13:145
      Mikey shouldn't talk since his squeelers are sipping badly!    Notice
    both the squeelers and faiders are looking for a good QB?  The
    squeelers are actually in worse shape than LA.
    
    	Tim
40.288BSS::JCOTANCHGo Air Force - Stun the Irish!Fri Oct 18 1991 14:4612
    
> Jay-bone is only as good as his offensive line. If you give him time to throw 
> he does a pretty reasonable job at finding the open receiver.

> Under pressure (any sort) is a completely different story


    You hit the nail right on the head, Metz.
    
    
    Joe

40.289Filet JayQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderFri Oct 18 1991 17:234
    Yea Tim,  But not much worse off......  Wrong Way Jay is right up 
    there with the worst of `em.......  Boy he really SIPS.....
    
    Big Game
40.290How's it feel, Faids? :^)BSS::JCOTANCHTue Oct 29 1991 11:5629
    What a beautiful backbreaking loss by the Faiders last night, losing
    one they probably should've won. :^) :^)  I couldn't believe KC came out 
    looking so awful, but gotta give the Faids credit for holding off a couple 
    KC comeback attempts until Wrong Way Jay's disastrous interception early 
    in the 4th with LA about to put the game away.  Even if the Faids settle 
    for a FG there they probably win because KC wasn't doing much offensively. 
    That long int return was just the boost the Chiefs needed.  KC
    converted 2 4th downs, one on each TD drive to complete the comeback. 
    A few plays before the winning TD the Chiefs were called for offensive
    interference on an absolutely horrendous call, but at least it didn't
    end up affecting the outcome of the game.
    
    What in the hell is the Faiders' f&*%ing problem?!?  Do the 
    a$#holes think they have to start a damm fight every time poor little 
    Wrong Way Jay gets sacked?  Just play football and quit acting like
    f#%$ing street-fighting idiots.
    
    The Faider d-line is definitely the strength of their team.  They
    didn't give KC much running room and were constantly in DeJerk's face.
    LA also had some good, unexpected calls, which certainly isn't
    uncharacteristic of them.  The TD pass on 3rd and 1 in the 2nd quarter
    was a gem - the receiver was *wide* open.  And the fake punt took what
    wind was left out of KC's sails but Wrong Way managed to choke.  (Heh
    Heh).  I just hope Denver's ready for these type of calls a week from
    Sunday.
    
    
    Joe
    
40.291THANK THE EQUALIZER!!!!!!WLDWST::VALENZUELATue Oct 29 1991 12:076
               Good job Jay Schroeder!!!!!
       The Equalizer comes through again!!! K.C should thank the EQ.
       (Jay) for giving them an early turkey dinner! The Equalizer
       will keep every team in the game,with a chance to win.
       I hope Raiders do something about getting rid of Schroeder!
       
40.292Wrong Way Jay <> To LacheyQUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeTue Oct 29 1991 13:2921
    HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!
    
    
     You gotta love it....  The Faids choke,  K.C. has 5 road games and
    the Donks hold 1st place by a Knats A**.....  HAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!!
    
     Wrong way proves once again that Uncle Al Davis made the worst mistake
    of his life trading Lachey to the Foreskins for some clown that should
    have stayed in Baseball.  Jay is a bum and I know that Art ain't gonna
    put up with this kinda crap from him much longer.
    
     I couldn't beleive that call of offensive pass int. on the K.C.
    receiver.....  That is until I saw Uncle Al handing the Zebra a
    C-Note ($100.00) on the side line....  He's finally learning from 
    Revees and Bowlen...   ;^)
    
    Big Game
    
    
    P.s.  Donks To Pound Both K.C. And Faiders At Home to Clinch AFC WEST
    	  And Hoot Owes Me $10.00   HAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
40.293Donks Sip!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Oct 31 1991 14:2115
    Tough loss for the Raiders on MNF, they kicked KC's butt all night
    but ended up walking away the losers. Schroeder's getting most of 
    the blame as usual, but there were two passes to Raider receivers 
    in the endzone that should of been caught but were dropped. Schroeder
    can't get the blame for that, he also wasn't on  the defense when KC 
    did come back and score 2 TD's. He did give them the ball that lead to
    their first TD, and he also gave them the ball when they had a chance 
    to tie it up with a field goal. I don't know what all these Donk
    fans are snivelling about, the Donks are lucky to have come away 
    with a W to last years worst team, and they should have lost it. 
    Not to worry though, we'll see how many show up in here after the 
    Raiders put the hurt on the Donks AGAIN! :-)
    
    
    Carlos
40.294QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerThu Oct 31 1991 20:165
    HAAAAAAAAAAAAA !!!!  I got ticket to the game against the Faids...
    I haven't been to a Donks game yet where they've lost......
    The Big Game KOD is on the Faids !!!
    
    
40.295DOWN WITH THE E.Q.WLDWST::VALENZUELAFri Nov 01 1991 13:5721
                Schroeder the Equalizer must go!!!!!!!
       Sorry, guys but the E.Q. sucks! I understand there were some drop
       passes,but that is common in all games. Every time the EQ gets 
       pressure,he always seems to find the oppossing team's hands!!!
       He makes quite a few bad passes,descions and keeps every team
       in the game. I've yet to see the Raiders put away a team, all
       the teams that have losing records still have a chance to
       upset the Raiders! The EQ said on ESPN that he shouldn't have
       thrown those passes,but should have made better descions or
       even kick some field goals! Toooooo late now!!!!!!!!!!!!!
       I don't know about you guys, but haven't you guys suffered 
       enough with the Marc Wilson era??? Maybe they have to also
       change up their offensive scheme! Commentators are saying
       that the Raiders are asking to much of Schroeder,well maybe
       they should draw plays were Jay drops back less yards and
       get rid of the ball much quicker or dump off passes to the
       backs!!! (ex. like the 49ers). I think then they will see 
       that the EQ has no touch ! so then what next?? The Raiders
       have had a pretty good team over the past years, but no QB
       to lead them since Plunkett left! 
    
40.296Al is still one of the better ownersANGLIN::KIRKMANMoving is HELLFri Nov 01 1991 14:3711
    To some extent, the QB problems may be a result of the Raiders'
    insistance on the "vertical passing game" i.e. Al Davis.
    
    Consistently depending on the long pass requires a great QB, speed WR
    (got them), and a very good O-line.  A mearly good QB would look a lot
    worse than he than in some other scheme.
    
    Don't get me wrong, other passing scheme require skilled QB, but it
    would be difficult to excell in the Raiders' scheme.
    
    Commander Scott
40.297Faids might get to playoffs!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Nov 01 1991 15:2418
      re-Carlos,  Put another hurt on the donks?   The Faids didn't put a
    hurt on them the 1st game.  yes they won,  but a 3-4 point win (can't
    remember the score) doesn't imply a hurt.  Now a 40-6 score would is
    different,  and we know that won't happen between these 2 teams no
    matter where they play.
    
      Lets not talk to much luck for Denver until you look at how the Faids
    got their last 2 wins, ie seattle and rams.....
    
      IMO, If the uncle wouldn't of picked up Lott, who was the guy who
    basically won those 2 games,  then the faids would be 3-6 instead of
    5-4.
    
      I believe the series will split this year.   Both Denvers and LAs
    offenses are lackin right now (not alot of points).  The second game
    advantage belongs to Denver 'cause of homefield and better QB.
    
    	Tim
40.298Art is a Real Raider !!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 01 1991 18:478
     Tim,  I think your analysis is pretty much right on.  You know,
    The one thing I can't beleive is that Uncle Al has put up with
    Wrong Way Jay this long... Al is one of the better owners ans usually
    dosen't keep poor performers around very long (ie: Sammy Seal) I'll
    bet Jay is riding the pine nexted(tm) year if the Unk has anything
    to say about it !!!   BTW Schell is a good coach !
    
    Big Game
40.299ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Nov 08 1991 10:158
    >The second game advantage belongs to Denver 'cause of home field
    >advantage and a better QB.
    
    Yeah but you forget that Art Shell owns your QB, and your team, 
    homefield or no homefield Shell is 5-0 against the Donks! Besides
    Marcus is back in Town. Raiders by 7.
    
    Carlos
40.300Looking forward to the "clash"COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Nov 08 1991 13:1211
      faids by 7,   Carlos, even you know that theese games are usually
    decided by 1-4 points.
    
      A snow storm is coming sunday (supposedly) so I wonder how good the
    faids will play in that.   Denver rarely looses in snow games.
    
      I'm wondering how much playing time Marcus will get?  I would think
    Shell would "slowly" ween him back into the game, so maybe 10 carries
    max.....
    
    	Tim
40.301Start sweating Donks!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Nov 18 1991 14:3919
    Hey Tim, I know it's late but you were right about Shell weening
    Marcus back in, he did'nt do too much against the Donks rushing wise, 
    although he did manage to throw a beautiful TD pass. Against the
    Seahawks this weekend he only rushed for 54 yds, but that was more
    yardage than any of the other Raider backs. Schroeder tore it up
    yesterday, didn't get to see the game but I saw some highlights and I
    wished I coulda seen the game. With this season's sweep of the Seahawks
    the Raiders tied up the series between them at 14-14, it seems that as
    long as I've followed the Raiders they've always had a tough time with
    the Seahawks so I'm glad to see things turning around. The Donks are in
    sole possession of first now, after sweeping the Chiefs (Reeves owns
    Shotenheimer (sp?) the way Shell owns Reeves), and they've got the
    easiest schedule of the three (Raiders, Donks, Chiefs), but I think the
    Donks gottza be a little nervous about the Raiders, especially after
    the way they played against the Seahawks yesterday plus the fact that
    the Seahawks are gonna blow the Donks away this weekend! :-)
    
    
    	Carlos
40.302Jay will knock the faids off for the DonksQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 18 1991 17:159
    
     Faiders are looking like they might make a race out of it !!  The
    Donks will be hurting if they let them tie it up and are in a must win
    position...  On the other hand...  The Faids have a pretty tough road
    to hoe till the end of December
    
    My moneys on the Donks,
    
    Big Game
40.303Over-Raters to lose at least 2 more BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 18 1991 17:4618
>    I think the
>    Donks gottza be a little nervous about the Raiders, 
    
    I'm sure Denver's real nervous.....
    
    
    
       .......NOT!!!!!!!
    
    
    I would bet right now that the Faids will lose at least 2 more, and I
    don't think Denver will lose more than 2 the rest of the way. 
    Therefore ---------> Divison title to Denver.
    
    Thank you and good night.
    
    
    Joe
40.304Its tight!!!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Nov 18 1991 17:4811
       Yeh,  I saw Jays stats,  and (I'm forcing this out) was impressed
    with it.  Mind you that Seattle doesn't have a great defense,  but only
    missing completions and no Int's is great,  for Jay anyway.  I'm not
    worried, 'cause like BG said,  the faids have a tougher schedule,  so
    chances are they will be more likely to lose.
    
      Should be good,  and I would love to see another donk/faid game come
    playoffs.  Denver has been a kick away from winning,  and they are do
    for a W against Shell.
    
    	Tim
40.305ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Nov 18 1991 18:1714
    God! I hate that "Not!!" stuff, oh it was cute the first couple of
    times I heard it, but now that everybody (even Joe) is saying it, it
    kinda grates on my nerves.
    
    I agree that the Donks have an easier road ahead, (it's bad enough that
    they got the refs paid off, but now they've got the schedule makers on
    the payroll too?) but that's ok, cause the Raiders have been firing on
    all eight cylinders since the Monday night Chiefs game that they let
    slip away. And they're only gonna get better. They'll have some tough
    tests though, against the Saints, the Bills, and the Chiefs. Another
    rematch in Denver is a very likely possibility, but better there than
    KC.
    
    Carlos
40.306gotta like the Donks chancesQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 18 1991 21:1717
    
     Correct,  The Faids have been playing well since the debachle in KC.
    I think it's really anyones title at this time (K.C.,  L.A.,  Donks)
    With one more win in the Division for the Donks (This Sunday) it will
    be all but through though.  LA has some real tough road games and
    still has to count on Wrong Way to keep them and not the other team in
    it.  Jay had a good game but we all know he's due to blow-up soon.
    as the presure mounts look for good 'ole Jay to fold.  The faids
    are sure to pull out a WC which could lend it self to a rematch in the
    `offs of these two teams (Donks/Faiders).  It surely will be a great
    one if it happens and it will be in Denver you can bet on that.
    
    Big Game
    
    P.s.  The Faids are my second most loved team......     NOT!!!!!!
    
    		;^)
40.307(Seahawks/Jets) vs. Broncos currentlyANGLIN::KIRKMANMoving is HELLTue Nov 19 1991 12:3114
    Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't unlikely that the Raiders and
    Broncos will meet in the playoffs?
    
    Given that KC is unlikely to win the division and neither LA or Denver
    will fall to the #3 wildcard spot - won't the two teams be in seperate
    *wildcard* games?  I thought that the #3 division winner plays the #3
    wildcard or the non-division wildcard. (Or something like that) 
    
    The odds on the Raiders and Bronos both winning their wildcard AND
    beating Buffalo/Houston to meet in the AFC championship game are a bit
    long.
    
    Scott
    
40.308QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 19 1991 12:596
    
     You know,  I was thinking the same thing after my note.  I beleive
    you're correct, it is a long shot but a possibility....  Whats the 
    scoop Ninj??
    
    Big Game
40.309BSS::JCOTANCHTue Nov 19 1991 13:1118
    For Denver and the Faids could meet in the playoffs under 2 scenarios:
    
    1. Denver or LA wins the division and the other ends up with the 3rd
    wild-card slot.
    
    2. KC wins the division and Denver and LA get the 1st and 2nd wil-card
    slots.  This one's pretty unlikely considering KC's a game out now and
    they play 4 of their last 5 on the road.
    
    
    I've always disliked Luckalo, but I'm *really* starting to hate them
    now.  I don't know what the hell Thurman Thomas was trying to prove by
    winging the ball at the wall after he scored a TD late in the 2nd half. 
    I might even pull for the Faiders against Luckalo when they play in a
    few weeks.
    
    
    Joe
40.310FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Nov 19 1991 13:239
    Joe is right about the playoff scenarios.  After all, Washington and
    Philadelphia did both make the playoffs as wild-cards last year and
    played each other.  Patriots and Jets did so in 1985, too.
    
    Maybe I'm missing something (and probably am) but where does all this
    contradicting one's statement with NOT come from?  It's annoying to say
    the least.
    
    John
40.311BSS::JCOTANCHTue Nov 19 1991 13:3512
    John, I'm pretty sure the "not" thing was started in Wayne's World on
    SNL.  It has caught on with alot of people and Bud is even using it on
    one of their commercials.  It will probably wear itself out shortly,
    but in the meantime I kind of like it....
    
    
    
              
    HA! Bet you guys thought I was gonna throw a NOT in here.  :^)
    
    
    Joe 
40.312Teachers Pet ?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Nov 19 1991 15:1910
    >> I don't know what Thurman Thomas was trying to prove by winging
    >> the ball at the wall after he scored....
    
    I know what you mean Joe, that was without class. Of course if it
    woulda been a Raider that did that, there would've been a million
    yellow flags flying. I think Thomas should've gotten a flag for
    unsportsman like conduct, or taunting, or something.....oh well!
    
    Carlos
    
40.313 #2 ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Thu Nov 21 1991 13:3414
    Looking through yesterdays USA Today I seen that the Raiders have
    been slowly moving up in the rankings on defense, they are presently 
    the #2 defensive team in the AFC, offense is another story though,
    they're only three or four away from dead last in the AFC, the lack of
    a running attack is a major contributor to this 'though. Another
    interesting thing I noted in Gordon Forbes' commentary about the Bills
    was that he was forcasting what he termed "a very likely AFC
    Championship game" between either the Bills/Oilers or the
    Bills/Raiders. Of course it's way to early to tell, but I hope he's
    right about another Bills/Raiders match up in the post season
    championship.
    
    
    	Carlos
40.314QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerThu Nov 21 1991 14:315
    Why ???   So the Faids can get slapped again.... Luckaolo will
    kill them.
    
    
    Big Game
40.315Bo's announcement makes it officialGENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishThu Nov 21 1991 18:015
    
    	Bo is now a 1 sport (baseball) athlete on the advice of
    	his doctors.
    
    	Claybone
40.316Forbes smorbesCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Nov 22 1991 11:515
       I think he made the right decision.  Though he was a faider,  I would
    have hated to see him get hurt again, and end up paying the "penalty" for
    risking his bod.
    
    	Tim
40.317Karnac of SpoutsOURGNG::RIGGENFree Ivan the terribleFri Nov 22 1991 18:5210
The Raiders will be lucky to win 2 more games this season.


@Cincinnatti  W
@San Diego    W
Buffalo       L
@New Orleans  L
Kansas City   L

Just lucky they don't play the Bronco's...
40.318Geez, who woke Riggen up?BSS::JCOTANCHFri Nov 22 1991 19:193
    
    
    
40.31910-6, no problema!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Nov 22 1991 19:2010
    
    >> Just lucky they don't play the Broncos!
    
    Hey Mods, shouldn't this be moved to the jokes topic?
    
    As far as them being lucky to win two more, don't bet on it, I think 
    they'll lose two more, to , to the Chargers (Maybe???) and to the
    Chiefs. They've got revenge on their minds for Buffalo, Cinci is weak, 
    and the Saints game is on Monday night and everybody knows that the 
    Raiders are just about an automatic win in that category.
40.320How'd the Faids do in KC?BSS::JCOTANCHFri Nov 22 1991 19:259
>    and the Saints game is on Monday night and everybody knows that the 
>    Raiders are just about an automatic win in that category.
    
    The Faiders' Monday night record is an overused and overrated stat!
    Besides, the game is in New Orleans and those fans will be rockin' and
    rollin'.
    
    
    Joe
40.321How'd the Faids do in Denver?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Nov 22 1991 19:534
    >The Faiders' Monday night record is an overused and overrated stat!
    
    Sure....if the Donks owned it, we'd never hear the end!
    
40.322CSC32::SALZERSat Nov 23 1991 01:014
    The last time I saw the Raiders on monday night they lost.   
    It was wonderfull.
    
    BoB
40.323I love it when a plan just falls together.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Nov 25 1991 12:364
    Speaking of wonderful, the Raiders are right back on top, where they
    belong, isn't that just wunderful? :-)   
    
    Carlos
40.324OopsCOMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Mon Nov 25 1991 13:234
       I don't know about wonderful,  but it wasn't totally unexpected
    considering who they played, the worst team in the NFL.
    
    	Tj
40.325#1 in the WestELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Nov 25 1991 14:118
    Well when you consider that the Raiders only had 19 yards passing, then 
    you know what I mean when I say wonderful. It was a wonder that they
    even won much less blowing them out. Incidentally, the Bengals
    shouldn't have even had 14 pts., one of the Denver refs gave the
    Bengals a mercy TD at the end of the first half.  Speaking of Denver,
    how about them Seahawks Tim. :-)
    
    Carlos
40.326Big Win For the Faider FaithfulQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 25 1991 14:2810
    
     Well,
      Looks like this season is shaping up to be another battle for the
    title in the West.  Denver just couldn't get it going in Seattle
    yesterday.  If they don't turn it around the Faiders will be Champs
    this year.  Jackson shoulda cought the pas for the winning score...
    Not like him to drop one like that.  Oh well,  the Donks play well
    ubder pressure....  Congrats to the Faids for hanging in.
    
    Big Game
40.327COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Mon Nov 25 1991 15:486
      what about the seagulls?   Both teams looked like #$%&!!   Denver
    went in dazed and left dazed.  Watch Seattle crawl back into the
    playoff hunt.  If KC isnt careful,  they could choke right out of the
    playoffs....
    
    	Tj
40.328Raiders 9 Chargers 7ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 02 1991 12:058
    Yesterdays win over the Chargers wasn't a pretty one, but it sure did
    mean alot. The Raiders are still on top in the west, plus it's another
    win within the division which could end up being the deciding factor
    especially if it comes down to the Raiders and Chiefs. The Donks and
    Chiefs both kept pace yesterday, and you know it's gonna go down to the
    wire, any one of these three could end up the division champs. 
    
    Carlos
40.329Shoulda lost this game !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 02 1991 13:3512
    
     What a Joke....  The Faiders will be thrashed by the Bills nexted(tm)
    week.  Jay and the rest of the Faider offense showed their true colors
    yesterday.  What a sorry excuess for a footbal team.  Look for the
    Donks to go  3-0 and the Faiders to go 1-3 to close the season.  The
    donks all but have this years AFC west Title wrapped up.  After the
    Soilers have their clocks cleaned by the Eagles tonight the Donks will
    also be on their way to a possible homefield advantage in Mile High.
    You Gotta love it !!  Faider fans...  Enjoy being on top while you
    can cause you're not gonna be ther come the end of the season.
    
    Big Game
40.330ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 02 1991 14:2112
    >>What a sorry excuess for a football team.
    
    Yeah...but...this sorry excuse of a football team has swept your
    awesome Donks the last 2 years, and have won the last 5 times they've
    played, and they lead the series something like 46-19. Not to mention
    being the AFC West defending Champs (while the Donks were dead last).
    Of course I could probably go on to say that they are the winningest
    team in all sports, and that they have won the third most SuperBowls
    ever, and, and....well it just goes on and on! Not too bad for a sorry
    excuse, of course they're no Broncos, but they'll do.
    
    Carlos
40.331Just Win Baby, Just WinROYALT::FORGETLA Raiders #1Mon Dec 02 1991 14:5815
    
    
    
        The Raiders defense is all cranked up.  I was hoping for
    a shut out.  Wrong Way Jay had a tough 1st half.  Scott Davis
    came threw again this season with another blocked Field goal.
    Ronnie Lott picked off the hail Mary pass at the end.  
    
    Buffalo
    at New Orleans
    Kansas City
    
    those are the teams left.  9-4 are the Raiders
    
    Mike
40.332BSS::JCOTANCHMon Dec 02 1991 15:0710
>    Of course I could probably go on to say that they are the winningest
>    team in all sports, and that they have won the third most SuperBowls
>    ever, and, and....well it just goes on and on! 
 
    Carlos, you should quit living in the past and worry about this season
    and the upcoming game against the Bills.  You're starting to sound like
    a Notre Dame fan.  
    
    
    Joe
40.333Just win (enough to make the playoffs), babyTALLIS::SNDCSL::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Mon Dec 02 1991 15:364
    
    Raiders to finish 9-7, take it to the bank..   
    
    /Jeff
40.334LUNER::BROOKSStardate 12.06.91 - BE THERE !Mon Dec 02 1991 15:431
    Silver and Black Roooullle !!!!!!!
40.335CTHQ2::LEARYBetter than LDSMon Dec 02 1991 17:037
    Someday Joe C., dat comment will come back ta haunt ya.
    Premature burial is what yer givin us.
    
    Go Raiders 
    
    MikeL
    
40.336Donks = AFC West Champions !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 02 1991 17:2821
    re: 332
    
     More like Hoot...  
    
      Carlos,
    
     10-6 will be the Faiders ending record...  While the Donks finish
    12-4.  The past is the past and know one can change it.  You Faider
    fans are all the same.  You live there...  In the days when you had
    a real team and a real QB and a real city to play in.  Bellie up to
    the bar and get ready for another season finished as second flute to
    the awsome Donks.  
    
    Big Game
    
    
     P.s.  The Sweep won't mean a thing when the Donks take the title !!
    
    
    
    
40.337FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Dec 02 1991 17:336
    I wouldn't mind if Denver finished 1st .... as long as they don't
    finish second.  The second place team hosts the Patriots in 1992 (since
    it's highly unlikely the Colts can catch us, we'll almost certainly
    finish 4th) and I'll be happy to see us go anywhere - except Denver.
    
    John
40.338QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 02 1991 17:486
    
     I don't know what it is but the Pats seem to have a very tough time
    of it at Mile High.  The Clowns are close behind and surely surpass
    the Pats in the magnatude of games lost in Mile High.
    
    Big Game
40.339CSOA1::BACHTHE Chicago Bear FanMon Dec 02 1991 17:494
    I, for one, hope the Donks get to the Super Bowl.  You see, I'm a Bears
    Fan...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
40.340Da Bears, not this yearCTHQ2::LEARYBetter than LDSMon Dec 02 1991 18:105
    Chip,
    Does that mean yer goin to root fer the Skins?
    
    MikeL
    
40.341CSOA1::BACHTHE Chicago Bear FanMon Dec 02 1991 19:468
    Da_Bearz
    
    Actually, if my Bears ain't there, and the Pat ain't there, and the
    Browns ain't there, I'm a Buffalo fan.
    
    I was pulling for the saints but their offesive mind set makes me sick.
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
40.342QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 02 1991 19:485
    
     What !!   A Bears fan talking about the lack of another teams 
    offense ???  Will wonders never stop....  
    
    Big Game
40.343CSOA1::BACHTHE Chicago Bear FanTue Dec 03 1991 12:123
    Lack of ability and lack of cajones are two different thing Big_Dame...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
40.344QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 03 1991 13:215
     The bears have lost 2 straight...  Sound like a lack of both to me !!
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game
40.345uncle al had lots of $$$ for refs ;^)COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Tue Dec 03 1991 15:3715
      Wow,  this is the most action that this note has seen since
    pre-season.   The faids did get lucky against SD,  and Jay was trying
    to give the game away.  SD would have won if it weren't for that VERY
    weak holding call on the TD pass in the 4th.
    
      If Jay choked like this against SD,  imagine what he will do with
    d bills.   The bills have Bruce Smith back,  which means better pass
    rush.
    
      I don't know if the bills will stomp the faids,  but they should win
    as long as Kelly doesn't throw 4 ints again.
    
    	Tim
    
      
40.346CSOA1::BACHTHE Chicago Bear FanTue Dec 03 1991 16:2614
    Easy there, Big_Dame.  The Bears have lost the last two of the total
    4 loses this season.  But I caint claim they've played without cajones
    this year, I Cain say that about da_Aints.  dumb_a losses to be sure,
    but I didn't see 'em Ban_Rollon_over.
    
    Mora played for OT against the FalseCrums when he could have tried an
    inch of *real* offense.  What did Morona do?  Dived in the middle 
    three time and Punted.  Lost the toss for OT and lost the game.
    
    Reminded me of some-thing Raymond Berry/Barry would have done.
    
    Morona is scareded shiftless with the loss of Q.B. Heb_Serbert.
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
40.347Maybe when they score more that 13 ptsQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 03 1991 17:244
     Agreed on the `Aints thing.....  Da Bears have played tough but 
    still don't strike me as a powerhouse offense !!
    
    Big Game
40.348CSOA1::BACHTHE Chicago Bear FanTue Dec 03 1991 17:3712
    Big_G,
    
    I think we're in violent agreement.  Da_Bearz haven't shown much
    Potential on the score board lately.
    
    Need Muster, Anderson, Bortz, and Thorton healthy before it happens...
    
    Now back to the Faiders, which is another tale of woeful offense...
    
    ;-)
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
40.349QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 04 1991 12:509
    
     Agreed...  Speaking of the Faiders...  I bet Uncle Al, Uncle Hootsie
    and the Parrot all shudder every time the see Beruline (sp?) backing-
    up Troy at Dallas.....  He's twice the QB Jay could ever dream of 
    being.  What happened there anyhow...  Carlos,  You know why the Faids
    traded such a talent when they had to know they had a no-talent in 
    Wrong Way Jay?
    
    Big Game
40.350ConfusedHPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Dec 04 1991 12:544
       Cain someone 'splain to me why EL-Lay is favored over the Bills this
    week? Am I missing something here? Did Thomas and Kelly git in a car
    wreck? Did the Buff. Defense join the French Foreign Legion?
                                    Denny
40.351Bills should be +7 pts Seriously !! QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 04 1991 13:106
    
     You've got to be kidding....  The Faiders are favored of the Luckaolo?
    It's time to take out a secong mortage and bet it all on the Bills...
    The Faids don't stand a chance in this game.  I Hope ;^)
    
    Big Game
40.352Bruce who?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Wed Dec 04 1991 19:1426
    	You guys crack me up, you don't really expect a repeat of last
    years championship blow out do you? That was a fluke, the Raiders just
    had a terrible day, and Buffalo did everything right. A better
    indicator of how close this game will be is the first game that they
    played last year at Buffalo, where the Bills won it 38-24. Although the
    Bills won this one, they were dominated throughout most of the game by
    the Raiders, until early in the 4th quarter when the Bills exploded
    with 21 (?) unanswered points in a span of about 2 minutes (I think).
    Don't expect this to happen in L.A., especially after the blowout.
    You can bet the Raiders will be psyhced, and ready to play! (Even
    Schroeder).
    
    	About Beuerlein, the reason the Raiders got rid of him is none
    other than Uncle Al. He held out last year for more money, and this
    didn't sit to well with Mr. Davis, so he traded him to Dallas for a 4th
    round pick next year. I think they coulda done better than a 4th, but I
    don't think he was by any stretch, a major loss. He always put up good
    stats for himself, except one, the W's and L's stat. This plus the fact
    that they've got the rookie Robo-QB on the bench made him expendable.
    Bottom line, the Raiders win with Schroeder, even if it doesn't always
    look so pretty, so the loss of Beuerlein is no biggy!
    
    Raiders over Bills by +7 in the Revenge Bowl! 
    
    Carlos
    
40.353QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 04 1991 21:209
     No Way the Faids even cover the spread in this one.  The bills are
    on a role and will do all they can to stop the Faids from having their
    revenge.
    
     I really think the the trade to dallas was a mistake.  The faids could
    use the young talent at QB...  
    
    Big Game
    
40.354HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Dec 05 1991 10:113
       I agree Carlos, the game might be a lot closer. But to make the
    Raiders favorites just doesn't make ANY sense to me.
                                                Denny
40.355Not a gambler, but play one on TVWONDER::REILLYSo I rewired itThu Dec 05 1991 10:3312
40.356Taking nothing away from AlANGLIN::KIRKMANBack to shoveling snow again (Uugh)Thu Dec 05 1991 12:596
    re:  Beuerlein
    
    In a way it's amusing.  Al Davis cultivates a rebel image for the team,
    but gets annoyed  when one of his players gets rebelious.
    
    Scott
40.357Uncle Al is a Mobster !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 05 1991 13:2310
    
     Theres nothing left to take away from Al.  He's a has been !! 
    
    :^)
    
     I too was surprised when Al let Beuerlein go....  He seemed to
    fit all the Faider cut outs...  Interesting,  I think maybe it
    goes alittle deeper than the $$$.  Maybe he and Art didn't click ?
    
    Big Game
40.358CSOA1::BACHThe actor/singer is DEAD!!!Fri Dec 06 1991 14:251
    Al needs to cut some EGO, his Beuerloins move was the worsted.
40.359HA!!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Mon Dec 09 1991 10:2823
       Can you say choke?   There,  I thought you could!
    
    
    
    
    
       As usual in faider losses,  Jay throws the game.   Heck,  if it
    weren't for the choke kicker of luckalo,  this game would not have gone
    into OT.
    
    
    
      Boy did Shell pull a Reeves or what?  Only 4 passes in the 2nd half. 
    It seemed to work for the 3rd QTR, but with the bills,  you just can't
    sit on a lead.  Yeh the faids have a good defense,  but obviously Kelly
    and co can score so fast.
    
      The Bill tight end across the middle was never stopped,  and I think
    that hurt the faids.  It was only 5-8 yards a pop,  but it worked!!
    
       Thanks for the lead in the AFC west Jay!!
    
    	Tim
40.360Jay, Jay, Jay... Thanks a Ton... You're the Greatest !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 09 1991 13:3319
    
     HHHHHAAAAAAAAAA!!!  I love it !!  Jay proves his worth to all of
    Donk Land once again.  This guy is a Bum and I can't beleive Uncle
    Al is still putting up with it.  Look for the Coke Head Todd
    Marinovich (SP?) to be running this team Nexted(tm) year.  The
    Faiders defense totaly dominated the Bills (The Faids Will be
    tough in the playoffs if Jay can keep it together) until the
    4th quarter when they were on the field all the time because the
    offense went into a coma.  There is no question that the Faiders
    should have won this game...  Jay gave it away just like I knew he
    would.  The Bill's aren't that good.  Kelly has the winning edge
    just like Elway.  If it wasn't for him the game would have never went 
    as far as it did.  The guy can have a horrible day and then come back
    in the final moments to pull it out.  Elway, Marino and Kelly are the
    best in the business today and the sad thing is no one is coming out
    that looks even close to their talent !!  The donks own 1st place
    now,  don't expect them to let it go !!!
    
    Big Game
40.361Thank You Luckalo!!!!BSS::JCOTANCHScott Norwood Fan ClubMon Dec 09 1991 13:5216
    I'm certainly no advocate of Schroeder, but those 2 interceptions
    really weren't bad passes by WWJ.  On the one at the end of
    regulation, he was hit as he threw the ball, and on the one in OT he
    just overthrew on a bomb and Kelso made a great diving catch.
    
    I was hoping the Luckalo DB would return that int. for a TD at the end
    of regulation so Norwood wouldn't have to kick.  I think that 5 yard
    procedure penalty made the difference on the kick missing to the right.
    
    If the Faiders don't win the division, their last game against KC will
    probably be for the first wild-card spot and who gets to play at home
    the first weekend.  The Faids might not even get a home game in the
    playoffs!!!!   HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! 
    
    
    Joe
40.362C'mon Baby-Snake!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 09 1991 19:1712
    This game was almost like the Monday night game against the Chiefs.
    It was all Raiders until the end. For the first time I am starting to
    agree with you Shroeder haters, although the offensive game plan for
    the second half was also very much to blame, I don't know what Robiskie
    was thinking, you can't take the pressure off the Bills and hope to
    skate the second half to victory. Marcus got hurt, that really sucks!
    I think (and hope) you're right about Marinovich next year Big Game.
    Schroeder's gotta go! Also I gotta disagree about that Elway, Marino,
    and Kelly parallel, two out of three ain't bad though.  Replace Elway
    with Montana and your back in bidniz.
    
    Carlos
40.363Can the 'aints win next week?COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 09 1991 19:3918
      Montana would never last with the questionable pass blocking line
    that Denver has.  Actually that line is what makes 1/2 of Elways
    mistakes, IMO.
    
      Carlos,  even if Todd plays next year,  it will take him 1-3 years
    just to get a winning hand, IMO.
    
      Marcus gets hurt on a kick return...What was Shell doing when he let
    him go in.  Marcus has proven time & time again that he is the faids
    best back.  Why risk his health?  Nick Bell is starting to show.  Good
    power back replacement for Bo.
    
    
      Speaking of Bo,  there was this sign on Monarch pass (here in
    Colorado) for the ski area that said "Bo don't know snow".  I chuckled
    on that one!
    
    	Tim
40.364Faiders 10 Saints 21QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 09 1991 20:3323
    
     Carlos,
    
     The Faiders would love to have Elway on their team.  With their "o" 
    line and the flock of receivers they have he would be un-stoppable in
    LA.  Seriously,  If you look at Johns winning percentage you'ld have 
    to boot Marino or Kelly first.  Elway is becomming better and better,
    he is one of the best and everyone but you and the Clown's fans will
    admit it.
    
     I really beleive that Todd will be the Faiders QB nexted(tm) year.
    Tim's point is valid...  It will take him time to become an experienced
    QB and a consistent winner but anything is better than Jay.  I really
    wish the Faids would hold on to him forever...  With Jay at the Helm
    the need not fear the Faids.
    
     Tim,  Look for the Saints to Slam Dunk the Faiders nexted(tm) week.
    The have lost 4 in a row and are in danger of missing the playoffs.
    if they beat the Faiders like I predict the Faids will be out of the
    race for the AFC west and very possiblely out of the playoffs all
    together.
    
     Big Game
40.365Raiders are Superbowl BoundROYALT::FORGETLA Raiders #1Tue Dec 10 1991 10:4911
    
    
    
       Go with the Raiders Monday Night.  The Real Man in Black will show 
    up.  Raiders have already clinched a play off spot already.  I was
    disappointed Sunday, just like the K.C. game.  The Raiders had the
    lead, but couldn't hold on.  Howie will be back in a few more weeks
    also.
    
    
    Mike
40.366COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Dec 10 1991 11:3011
      Raiders clinch a playoff spot already?   Only if they win at least 1
    and the jets, chiefs or fins choke big time.  It could be different if
    LA loses their last 2 and the others do better.  I'm not sure of tie
    breakers yet.
    
      'Aints might just win this weekend.  They have good pass rushing LBs, 
    and we all know that means Jay will throw INTs!!  Plus N'orleans is due
    a win.  The only thing the faids have going into this game is its a
    Monday nighter.
    
    	Tim
40.367BSS::JCOTANCHScott Norwood Fan ClubTue Dec 10 1991 11:514
    Faids, KC and Denver all have clinched playoff berths.
    
    
    Joe
40.368Not what I heard !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 10 1991 12:526
    
     Alright,  I'm confused...  Watching football Sunday I was under the
    understanding that the Raiders had yet to clinch even a Wild Card.
    Whats the scoop, Ninj...?
    
    Big Game  (Who would love to see the Faiders out on their ears)
40.369JARETH::YANKOWSKASPlease note new node nameTue Dec 10 1991 13:009
    re Big Game:
    
    I heard the same thing as Joe in .367 (Denver, Raiders, and KC have all
    qualified for the playoffs).  During last night's Dolphins-Bengals
    game, the announcers kept saying that "Miami is in the running for the
    only remaining AFC wild card spot".
    
    
    py
40.370Who knows when Al,Dan and Frank are talking, The all full of it !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 10 1991 13:047
    I know...  I heard the same.  Thats why I'm confused.  Hopefully
    the Ninj can clear this up with one of his well informed and factual
    notes.  The guy has won several bets for me this year by providing
    stats.  I should have profit sharing I guess !!   ;^)
    
    
    Big Game
40.371FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Dec 10 1991 13:1138
    Yup.  A Miami win coupled with a Jets loss puts them in.  If they win
    at San Diego on Sunday and if we can beat the Jets, Miami gets the last
    slot.  If both teams win on Sunday, then the winner of the Jets at
    Miami game the last week of the season will get the playoff slot (ditto
    for both teams losing and ditto for a Miami loss and a Jets win this
    weekend).
    
    The only other real battle is sorting out who finishes where in the AFC
    West and who will get home field advantage between Buffalo and Houston.
    
    Team	Overall	Div	Conf	Remaining
    
    Buffalo	12-2	6-1	9-2	at Indy, Detroit
    Houston	10-4	4-1	9-2	at Cleveland, at Giants
    Denver	10-4	4-3	9-4	Phoenix, at San Diego
    Raiders	 9-5	5-2	7-4	at New Orleans, Kansas City
    Kansas City	 9-5	5-2	7-4	at San Francisco, Raiders
    Miami	 8-6	4-3	5-5	at San Diego, Jets
    Jets	 7-7	3-3	5-5	New England, at Miami
    
    In the NFC, more teams are still alive and it's a bit too hard to sort
    out until after the weekend.  The Redskins have not only clinched the
    division but have clinched home field throughout the playoffs.
    
    Washington	13-1	5-1	9-1	Giants, at Philadelphia
    Chicago	10-4	6-1	8-2	Tampa Bay, at San Francisco
    Detroit	10-4	5-2	7-4	at Green Bay, at Buffalo
    Atlanta	 9-5	5-1	7-4	Seattle, at Dallas
    New Orleans	 9-5	4-2	7-4	Raiders, at Phoenix
    Dallas	 9-5	4-3	6-4	at Philadelphia, Atlanta
    Philadelphia 9-5	4-2	5-5	Dallas, Washington
    San Fran	 8-6	3-3	6-5	Kansas City, Chicago
    
    Chicago has the tie-break edge over Detroit, they split head to head. 
    Ditto for Atlanta over New Orleans.  The winner of this weekend's
    Dallas at Philly game is in good shape.
    
    John
40.372BSS::JCOTANCHScott Norwood Fan ClubTue Dec 10 1991 13:117
    Hey Big Game, don't ya believe me?!?!  :^)  
    
    Just pick up a sports page and it will indicate that those 3 teams have
    all clinched a playoff spot.
    
    
    Joe
40.373Ralph Is A Real Bozo !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 10 1991 15:2713
     Another good Note from the Ninj...  Thanks Buddy,  I may let you
    in on profit sharing afterall.
    
    Joe,  It's not that I didn't beleive you...  I just have gotten som
    many stories on the situation that I weant to ask the expert.  The
    Ninj always seem to have the right answer.  Sorry if I offended ya !
    Besides,  I never beleive anything printed in the local rag.  Hey !
    did anyone see Ralf Rottens article in Mondays paper.  What a crock
    of $%^&.  He makes the win over the `Spots sound like the second
    comming of Christ for Gawds sake...  
    
    
    Big Game
40.374FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Dec 10 1991 15:547
    Jack, I don't pretend to be an expert.  It was in the local paper today
    and I just paraphrased it.
    
    The secret isn't knowing a lot, the secret is knowing where to look to
    find the answer.
    
    Ninj
40.375I think you're an expert...QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 10 1991 17:128
    
     What ever...  Nice of you to take time out of your busy day to 
    enlighten the Junk Noters of the file (Noteably Me...)
    
    
    Thanks 
    
    Big Game
40.376CSC32::SALZERTue Dec 10 1991 20:4512
    I believe it's kind of an understood not in writing type of thing.
    If your going to be the head coach of the Raiders you have to do
    as Al says. Therin lies what was one of Shanahan's biggest problems
    and what he was subsequently fired over. Shanahan insisted that
    Burlein was his starter. The brilliant Al wanted Jay to start.
    Shanahan and Burlein both go and Jay gets the start. Sometimes
    you get exactly what is deserved. 
    
    Since LA lost to KC once already, this means that the Raiders appear
    to be tied for 2nd but are in fact 3rd in the AFC West. 
    
    BoB   
40.377Spoken like a true Bronco fan !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 10 1991 21:1111
     True BoB....  And only an elightened Bronco fan such as yourself
    would be able to see through the smoke to the heart of the matter.
    Uncle Al got what he asked for...  I sincerely hope that he is 
    enjoying it thourghly.  
    
     Sure is great to watch one man drag an entire team from first to
    third in one toss of the ball...  Unfortunatly,  Jay will ride
    pine nexted(tm) year.  I for one would love to see Al keep him as
    starter for 5 or 6 more years !!
    
    Big Game
40.378ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Tue Dec 17 1991 11:5413
    Well....that was a dreadful sight, the Raiders offense struggled
    miserably (if it was a horse I'd of shot it and put it out of it's
    misery) and the defense didn't do much better. What a time to peak :-)
    Bobby Hebert looked pretty good last night, kinda like a timex, he took
    a lickin and kept on tickin. Congrats to the Donks they clinched the
    division last night. Other than not having a chance to win the
    division, the loss last night was of no terrible consequences to the
    Raiders, they'll still be playing in the first round, and it's up to
    next weeks game to decide if they play at home or away. Schroeder
    looked terrible, Evans looked worse (passing wise), I was hoping to see
    Marinovich get some playing time but it never happened.
    
    Carlos
40.379JARETH::YANKOWSKASBut I HATE figgy pudding!Tue Dec 17 1991 12:166
    How old is Vince Evans?  
    
    Seems like he's been around forever...
    
    
    py
40.380CAMONE::WAYI believe I'll dust my broomTue Dec 17 1991 12:209
>    How old is Vince Evans?  
>    
>    Seems like he's been around forever...
    
He's third from the left in DaVinci's "The Last Supper"


hth,
'Saw
40.381CSOA1::BACHThe actor/singer is DEAD!!!Tue Dec 17 1991 12:444
    Vince was the last Bears QB to start an entire season.  And that was
    a loooong time ago (between Anvil-eni and Jimmy_Mac).
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
40.382ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Tue Dec 17 1991 13:334
    He's like 36 or 37. He can still book though, now only if he could pass
    half way decent.....:-(
    
    
40.383Faiders pulling the patented Redsox late season CHOKEQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 17 1991 14:3313
    I think, Given the practice time, that Vince could be just what the
    doctor ordered for the Faiders.  Jay certinly can't take them anywhere
    but down the toilet.  He really looked bad.  And, when given the gift
    of the Hebert fumble on the N.O. side of the grid he pulls his patented
    choke and give the balkl directly back to N.O..  Look for K.C. to put
    it to the Faiders two weeks in a row.  With a Houston loss and a Donk
    win nexted(tm) week the donks stand a good shot at another Superbowl.
    Sure would like to see a Washington/Denver rematch.  The Donks will
    win this time if they make it there.  Remember my prediction....
    
    Denver and Dallas in the Superbowl !!!
    
    BG
40.384COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Dec 18 1991 15:3610
      Hey Jack,  I don't know about the skins' losing to donks....
    
      I know of a guy that will take at least a $100 (unofficial) wager
    that says the Broncs and cowgirls don't get to the SB together this
    year.  I was next to the core 8 break room yesterday and said it will
    be denver & dallas in the bowl, and this guy stands up and says I bet
    $500 that they both don't go,  and of course I just laughed and said I
    was joking 'cause I don't think either will go......
    
    	Tj
40.385A New ERA......ROYALT::FORGETLA Raiders #1Thu Dec 19 1991 14:287
    
    
       Last Night on ESPN they said Wrong Way Jay has two sprained
    ankles.  That our man of the Future Todd M. was gonna start.  HE
    was excited.  Raiders all the way.    
    
    Mike    
40.386QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 19 1991 15:028
    
     New era...  HAAAAAAAAAAA !!!
    
     Todd M. Is a proven drug user...  Do you really think that
    he'll be any kind of leader.  Can't wait to see K.C. wipe
    the field with the Faiders and their coke head QB...
    
    Big Game
40.387USCTR2::NAHEARNThu Dec 19 1991 15:1512
    That Marinovich was a drug user has been proven....but to suggest that
    that makes him incapable of being a quality QB and/or leader is way off
    base (IMO)!!  Possibly the only difference between him and any other
    quality QB is that we KNOW he did drugs.  Other successful players were
    fortunate to not get caught at their vices.  Also, IMHO, suggesting
    that anyone is forever dogsh*t due to prior indiscretions in their
    lives demonstrates major league ignorance!!!
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
40.388HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesThu Dec 19 1991 15:202
       Besides, Todd's dad wouldn't let him eat Twinkies! How cain he miss?
                                               Denny
40.389let he who is w/o sin, cast the first...CTHQ3::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeThu Dec 19 1991 15:2210
    Well,
    Two QB's come to mind who had the rep(Ah repeat rep) of alcohol/drug
    use and did ok, namely Stabler and Namath. 
    
    As far as Marinovich, he was brought up with the strictest of health
    diets; i.e., I'd be more afraid of he going into a junk food frenzy,
    steenkin' up the joint, and claimin' a pseudo-Twinkie defense. 8^)
    
    MikeL
    
40.390great minds think alike, eh Denny? collisionCTHQ3::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeThu Dec 19 1991 15:261
    
40.391HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesThu Dec 19 1991 15:271
       Musta been the T-bird!
40.392Only half kidding !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 19 1991 15:4311
    
     I was Half Joking when I said that Todd would never be a leader
    because of his past drug use,  But only half.  It's proven that
    Cocaine in one of the most addictive drugs around.  It is also a 
    fact that better than 60% of drug users and Alcoholics begin using
    the stuff again in a very short time after "Cure".  If Todd. can keep
    his nose clean, especially now that he's got big $$ in his pocket
    than more power to him.  Also, think how much better Kenny and Joe
    might have been had they been clean.  
    
    BG
40.393Go Baby Snake!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Thu Dec 19 1991 16:3320
    It's about time they give the kid a chance, he couldn't do much worse
    than Schroeder and Evans did last week. He played in one pre-season
    game this year against the Cowpokes and did pretty good, he came into
    the game in the second half and scored at least one TD, I know it was
    only pre-season but still, he led the Raiders to victory. He looked
    very precise in that game, he didn't allow room for mistakes, I figure
    he'll be doing more handing-off than anything this weekend, but if need
    be the kid can throw. Also, the Raiders have eight players who were
    selected to the Pro_bowl :
    
    Ethan Horton, TE
    Steve Wisniewski, Gd
    Don Mosebar, C
    Greg Townsend, DE
    Ronnie Lott, S
    Jeff Gossett, P
    Jeff Jaeger, K
    Tim Brown, Return Spec.
    
    Carlos
40.394CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 19 1991 17:013
    I was surprised to see that the New England Patriots are ranked higher
    offensively in the AFC than the Raiders.  The Pats offense has
    generated more yards than Schroeder and Co.
40.395EARRTH::BROOKSPlato,Voltaire,Smith,ThompsonThu Dec 19 1991 18:3023
    re .394
    
    Not too suprising. The Raider's ground game has fallen off a cliff this
    year without Bo Jackson. Allen is still a good back, but not a
    300-carry a season back. Roger Craig is through, and Smith is a good
    complement, not a feature guy. On the passing side, Millen has 2 or 3
    300 yard games, and a few others where he's been over 250. Can't say
    the same for Schroeder.
    
    The difference is that Schroeder can generate big plays and points. The
    Pats are still learning.
    
    re Lott
    
    Score a BIG one for Al Davis. And you better believe that the Niners'
    braintrust is kicking themselves of this one. The Niners wanted to
    offer Lott a one year deal with an option, the Raiders were glad to get
    him with a two year deal. Great move. The Niners missed Lott's
    leadership in a huge way. 
    
    I've no doubt his loss probably cost the Niners a playoff berth.
    
    Doc
40.396Enquiring Minds Want To KnowQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 19 1991 19:0413
    
     Congrats to the Raiders for the 8 Pro Bowl picks...  As a 
    defense,  they played great baal in all but a few games this year.
    As an offense however,  they were offensive.  I still can't
    understand why Uncle Al let Wrong Way Jay hang on so long.  It
    became painfully obvious to me and 90% of this file that Jay
    was a loser early in 1990.  Somehow, he managed to hang on with
    the usually ruthless Al Davis for another season.  Anyone know
    what the scoop is here.  Could it be that Al just couldn't admit
    that he made a mistake when he traded for Wrong Way Jay.
    
    
    Big Game
40.397COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterThu Dec 19 1991 19:227
      The faids got 2 offensive lineman in the PB,  but why?   There line
    was lackluster and didn't produce much in the way of a running attack.
    
      Lott has to be in the top running for defensive MVP, and Townsend
    deserved the selection as well.
    
    	Tim
40.398I asked BG he said cost Al big $$$$$$$ ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSMerry Christmas EveryoneFri Dec 20 1991 09:336
 how often did Wrong Way get sacked? 

 might be the answer might not..

 mike
40.399Ethan Horton?CSC32::J_HENSONI'll 2nd that amendment!Fri Dec 20 1991 14:0410
I was surprised to see Ethan Horton make the Pro-Bowl.  But, before
anyone gets on my case, I'll admit that I only watched LA play two or
three times this year.  But, I never did see Horton have a particularly
good game, either.  I did seem him drop quite a few catchable balls,
though.

Anyone want to show me where I'm wrong?  I mostly am just wondering
if he really had a Pro-Bowl year.

Jerry
40.400DECWET::METZGERPromise me you won't rewire anything.Fri Dec 20 1991 16:4114
He ate the seachickesn alive both times they played the raiders. I'm pretty 
sure he couldda made the pro-bowl based on what he did against us alone...
However as his owner in FFL_B I have to say that he did have an excellent
year and seems to have made a great transition from running back to TE.

He'll only improve....

Considering the extrame lack of pass catching talent at TE in the NFL I say he
deserves the nod. There are a lot of great blocking TE's but not too many 
catching ones. The usuals (holman,kay,Miami, green -pitts,Mckellar) didn;t
really have great years...

Metz
40.401Barbara Streisand, eat your heart out!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Dec 20 1991 16:5110
    Watch for a star to be born this weekend! If he chokes it won't mean
    much cause it's expected from rookie QB's (?) but if he tears it up,
    the rest of the AFC West could kiss any hopes for the future goodbye.
    
    By the way, how did such superstars like Staubach, Bradshaw, Montana,
    Marino, Fouts, Moon, Stabler, etc...etc.. do in their first couple of
    NFL games? Did any of them cause an immediate impact, or is that
    unheard of for QB's?
    
    Carlos 
40.402Marino from the very beginningSHALOT::HUNTFluffy Bunny FeetFri Dec 20 1991 16:5610
40.403ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Dec 20 1991 17:043
    How about any others (ever) that were not mentioned?
    
    
40.404QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSFri Dec 20 1991 17:174
    surely wasn't Wrong Way Jay,  or Stabler, or Plunkett...
    And we all know it wasn't Elway...  He stunk it up for a few years !
    
    BG
40.405ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Dec 20 1991 17:213
    A few years.....a few years...?....He's still stinking it up Big_Shame!
    
    
40.406Elway #1QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSFri Dec 20 1991 17:248
    I should have known better than to put that in here with 
    slimey raiders fans on the loose...  Al I can say Carlos
    is he's put another AFC west championship under his cap.
    Thats a hell of a sight more than Wrong Way can say this
    year.  When the Faiders have a QB to speak of, come see me
    and we'll compare Elway to him... until then  TTTHHHHHHPPPPTTTTTT!!!!!!
    
    BG   ;^)
40.407Walsh makes me puke..CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Mon Dec 23 1991 10:099
The kid play's in 1 game and all ready he's the second coming 
of Stabler. Give me a break. Enberg and Walsh were making me 
sick talking about Marinovich. Let's see what the kid does over the
course of a FULL season. Then I'll be raving with the best of them.



Steve
40.408WONDER::REILLYSo I rewired itMon Dec 23 1991 10:142
    
    But do you think they showed his parents on tv enough?
40.409TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is almost two!!!Mon Dec 23 1991 11:314
>But do you think they showed his parents on tv enough?

Especially his dick haid father.  It's too bad teh guy continues to have any
influence on the kid's life. [No, I don't meant to open that rat hole again.]
40.410QB for sale, cheap!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 23 1991 12:0215
40.411Broncos Rule !!! The win the old fashion way, they Earn It !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 23 1991 13:5315
     Hey Carlos... I'm guessing by your P_Name that you watched
    In Living Color last night.  Wasn't Homey just great as Santa
    or I mean Homey Clause...  
    
     From what I saw of Todd,  he looks like he could be a good QB
    for the Faikers.  I don't think he'll do anything for them this 
    late in the year though.  I wouldn't be surprised to see him lose
    hi first to starts but people shouldn't take that as a sign of things
    to come.  Todd looks like he may have the talent and poise to become
    the Faikers QB of the future, true...  But the second comming of the
    Snake he is not,  at least not yet !!
    
    BG
    
    
40.412the "Coral Snake" !! ?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 23 1991 14:4117
    I think you're right about Marinovich not being the second coming of
    "the Snake". Although he is a lefty, wears #12, and if he coulda got
    the ball one more time I think he coulda pulled a last second victory
    yesterday, ala Ken Stabler. I do think though, that I was right on the
    money when I said last week that a star would be born. I also think
    that this kid could be even better than the "Snake", ahh!...I know..I
    know...blasphemy! ...but still....Maybe we should nickname name him the
    "Coral Snake", I think coral snakes are highly venomous, and bright
    red! Yes that sounds good, I think he just went from Baby-Snake to
    Coral-Snake. Al Davis did it again, everybody thought that signing
    Marinovich in the first round was utterly foolish, but i think uncle Al
    in all his football genious is probably smilin from ear to ear right
    now! Even if the Raiders don't do much in the playoffs this year, their
    future looks very bright, imagine Todd launching it to the Rocket,
    scary huh?
    
    Carlos
40.413Sounds like your ready to compare him to MontanaCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 23 1991 14:5611
      I saw some highlites, and don't get to excited, even though you faider
    fans need/have a reason to be excited at the QB position. Will you rant
    and rave after the chiefs sack todd 5-6 times next week?
    
    
     He threw what 3 tds,  and thats good,  but 1 game doesn't make him
    into an instant star.  Besides he didn't win...
    
       Please play Jay,  that would be a sure loss for faids.
    
    	Tim
40.414Merry Christmas Raider fans!WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Mon Dec 23 1991 15:0834
        This was in todays Mercury News reprinted without permission.

                                Happy Holidays!        Night Flier   ~~v~~

                   SCHROEDER THE RAIDER QUARTERBACK
       (Sung to the tune of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer)


Schroeder the Raider Quarterback,
had a very shaky arm.

And when he missed his targets,
Davis cursed with much alarm.

All of the Raider fan clubs
Used to call him dirty names.

They never gave poor Schroeder
Any chance to share the blame.

Then one Sunday in LA,
Shell stepped up and said,

"Jay it's time for me to see
Marinovich instead."

Then the Raider fans were clapping
Till they learned it's all not Jay.

Even with Todd at Quarterback,
Their team can lose anyway.

                                                       
40.415Raiders-Chiefs open ot up next weekendCSCOAC::ROLLINS_RMon Dec 23 1991 17:099
	Saturday's early game:
	  L.A.Raiders 9-7-0 at Kansas City 10-6-0
	Saturday's late game:
	  Atlanta 10-6-0 at New Orleans 11-5-0

	Sunday's early game:
	  Dallas 11-5-0 at Detroit 12-4-0 or Chicago 11-5-0
	Sunday's late game:
	  N.Y.Jets 8-8-0 at Houston 11-5-0
40.416ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 23 1991 17:5020
    >> Will you rant and rave after the Chiefs sack todd 5-6 times next
    >> week?
    
    They didn't sack him once yesterday, what makes you think they'll do it
    Saturday?
    
    >> Sounds like you're ready to compare him to Montana
    
    He's better than Montana...(:-) )...it took Montana a couple of seasons
    to make an impact. Besides like you said Tim, we Raiders fans finally
    have something to be exicited about at QB, don't burst my bubble yet!
    At least wait until the kid chokes. By the way, I'm not the only one
    who has praise for Todd, so does Shottenheimer, Cherry, Shell, T.
    Brown, Tom Weir, Walsh..etc..etc...the rookie's made a great first
    impression. Also, by comparison to Mr. Ed, a seasoned veteran playing
    against the worst team in the division, Marinovich, who played against
    the second best team in the division, does look like a star. 
    
    Carlos
    
40.417COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 23 1991 17:565
      Well it will be tough not to burst your bubble,  but since its X-mas
    time,  then I guess I can wait til the 26th.
    
    	Have a good one!
    	Tim
40.418Faiders could be 0-16 and you'd still be ravingBSS::JCOTANCHHow are the Faiders doing?Mon Dec 23 1991 18:049
>    Also, by comparison to Mr. Ed, a seasoned veteran playing
>    against the worst team in the division, Marinovich, who played against
>    the second best team in the division, does look like a star. 
    
    And Elway's team posted the W while Todd and the "Commitment to
    Excellence" boys posted their THIRD STRAIGHT loss.
    
    Joe
     
40.419ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 23 1991 19:0214
    >> When the Faiders have a QB to speak of, come see me and we'll
    >> compare Elway to him... until then  TTTHHHHHHPPPPTTTTTT!!!!!!
    
    Hey Big Game, is this a little earlier then you expected!
    
    Marinovich   3 TD's, 0 sacks, 243 yds, 0 int against the 2nd best in
    the division.
    
    Elway        0 TD's, 6 sacks, 196 yds, 1 int against the worst team in
    the division.
    
    Who's the veteran, and who's the rookie? HaaaHa..Heee...!
    
    Carlitos
40.420Donks and Cowboys in the SB... Count on it !!!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 23 1991 19:1642
    
     Boy...  You people just can't seem to get it through you thick
    haids, can you.  Elway WINS, Period...  He is the winningest 
    active QB in the NFL since 1984...  Thats what, 7 years running.
    Think about it !!  Who gives a sh*t about the QB Stats and ratings
    and all that other BS.  What is the Bottom Line.  In case you don't
    know I'll tell ya !!  It's wins baby.  Wins, Wins, Wins thats all
    that matters.  That coupled with the fact the Elway is the toughest
    QB in the league (Kelly's Right up there too) and rarely misses a 
    start and you have a consistent winner.  I get really sick of the
    Elway bashing that goes on in here.  The guy is one of, if not the 
    most feared QB by defenses around the league.  Put Elway on a team 
    like the 49ers of old, the 85 Bears, the Fish of the early `70s 
    and he's as good as anyone that played on those teams.  Put him
    on the Championship Steelers team and they go undefeated.  Calling
    Elway a loser, or a choke, or just an average QB is a joke.  The
    Man is the Proto type QB of the future.  90% of the teams in the NFL
    would kill to have the guy on their team.
    
     Todd Marinovich will be good.  You can see that he has the Talent
    and poise to become a starter for the Faiders, there is no question
    about that.  But, to compare him to the Snake, Stalbach(sp?) or 
    Montana is pure BS.  the guy has started on game, count it one.
    Yes, he looked good and threw for three TD's but he lost the game.
    The fact of the matter is,  the score make it look like the game was
    much closer than it really was.  Todd can thank the Faider defense
    for even being in a position to make it close.  The Chiefs should have
    won the game by 10-17 pts. but missed some opportunities that they
    had to score more.  The bottom line is that Marinovich has the talent
    to be a winner,  he has yet to prove he is one however. 
    
     The Faiders will lose to K.C. this weekend.  Not because Todd or Jay
    but because K.C. is the better team.  The Faiders have pulled their
    patented end of season slide into mediocrity and will be home for new
    years.  I personally would like to see Todd work out for the Faiders.
    having 3 great teams in the AFC West (Denver, K.C., and the Faiders)
    can't help but make them all better and in turn help the entire AFC
    to reach the calibar of play in the NFC today.  The NFC (as much as I 
    hate to say it) is and has been playing better football that the AFC
    for years.
    
    Big Game
40.421Yeh, most of what he saidCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 23 1991 19:581
      Its a good thing your in a good mood Jack;^)
40.422QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 23 1991 20:434
    Well, I gotta get all my shots in today...  I'm outa here till
    the 6th of Jan..  See ya all and have a great holiday season
    
    BG
40.423What's bright red and extremely venomous?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Dec 27 1991 12:0714
    Well, tommorrow's the big game and it looks like the rookie will be
    getting the start again. The Raiders are 40:1 odds against winning the
    superbowl. Defense has been the Raiders bread and butter all year long,
    but in the last three games (all losses) they have played poorly, if
    they can snap out of it and get back to form I think the rookie could
    lead the team on offense to make the big plays. Look for a lot of quick
    short passes to both Allen and Craig. Also watch for Tim Brown, and the
    other receivers and tight-ends to be a factor now that they have a
    decent QB. Hopefully Howie, and Golic will have recovered enough to
    help stop the run and put some pressure on grampa DeBerg.
    
    Raiders by 7 or more!
    
    Carlos
40.424Its not just the smogCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterFri Dec 27 1991 13:4013
      By 7 or more?   Maybe if they play like they did in the Monday
    nighter against the Chiefs a couple of months ago,  but this time they
    have to stop choking.
    
      The boy at QB is good for faids (maybe),  but don't be suprised to
    see him benched if the pressures and chokes come into play.  Of course
    if Jay is playing,  then go bowling, 'cause there is no reason to watch
    your team choke.
    
      Wait a minute.  I said choke alot in this reply.  Maybe a new name
    for this team is in order;^)   Any takers?
    
    	Tim
40.425Blowout city, Baaabbby!! Get a TO, Art!!BSS::JCOTANCHHow are the Faiders doing?Fri Dec 27 1991 13:417
    I can't believe the Chiefs are only favored by 4 points - they should
    be favored by 4 touchdowns.
    
    I'll be shocked if the Faids are in it after halftime.
    
    
    Joe
40.426Donks=Worst 12-4 team in the league!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Dec 27 1991 13:476
    >> Any takers?
    
    Hey Tim, the donks already have dubbs on that one, after their three
    chokes in the big game, although the vikes might flip you for it.
    
    Carlos
40.427I'm talking this yearCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterFri Dec 27 1991 13:501
    
40.428CSC32::J_HERNANDEZRudolphTheRedKnowsRain,DearFri Dec 27 1991 14:071
    Carlos, the Donks never choked, they flat got their  @$$#$ kicked.
40.429Ok, Now my bubble's bursted!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 30 1991 11:4811
    Marinovich, well he played like a uh....a rookie. The Chiefs were
    expecting him and they threw him into confusion with different looks.
    It was a good game though (matter of fact all of 'em were this
    weekend), and I really thought they were going to pull it off in the
    4th qtr....until they self destructed with all them penalties (wonder
    how much the refs charged Shottenheimer :-) Nick Bell was having a
    field day out there. Oh well, I guess this wraps up another good season
    for the Raiders and we'll just have to wait till nexted year as the
    saying goes. 
    
    Carlos
40.430BSS::JCOTANCHSee ya in August, FaidersMon Dec 30 1991 12:0716
>    It was a good game though 

    Are you maybe talking about the Atlanta-NO game, Carlos???  I admit I
    didn't sit down and watch this and only caught bits and pieces of it,
    but everytime I glanced at the TV one team was either stumbling on
    offense, turning the ball over, or being penalized.
    
    Well, Marinovich proved he can be the successor to Schroeder.  Four
    interceptions - Schroeder would be proud of that one.  Plus he fumbled
    one away too.  Not too bad.
    
    Now it's time to pull for those Faider-killin' Chiefs to go into
    Luckalo and whip that cocky-assed Thurman Thomas and his Bills.
    
    
    Joe
40.431My tidbitsCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 30 1991 13:4622
      I say the same Joe.  It was a sloppy game,  with 4 defensive starters
    on Chiefs being out.  The Chiefs didn't take advantage of the rookies
    mistakes.   This score was much closer than it should have been.  Heck, 
    mr reliable Lowery didn't have that great of a day.
    
      I told you guys not to get to excited about Todd.  He came out and
    thru-up all over himself.  He was lucky that Thomas went out with the
    accelerated heart beat.  He may be good one day,  but pleeaassee wait
    until he proves himself.
    
      Jay will be riding the pine next year,  or maybe traded.
    
      Chiefs beat faiders 3x this year,  and the faids go out on a 4 game
    skid!!!!
    
      I don't think the faids had a good year.  Yeh they beat the Broncos
    2x,  but the only other winning team they beat was the 49'rs,  and I
    think the 9'rs had a loosing record at the time they played.
    
      Next year Carlos......
    
    	Tim
40.432No way KC cain beat BuffaloTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is almost two!!!Mon Dec 30 1991 18:2511
A sloppy game for sure. 

Don't know what got into Marinovitch - he telegraphed his passes all afternoon.
Every time he dropped back, however, I thought I was looking at Kenny Stabler 
making a comeback.

The obvious statement here is - don't judge Marinovitch by the KC game.  He is 
21 (22?) years old, and starting his second NFL game ever.  It was a lot to ask
of him, and hopefully his future is still bright.

=Bob=
40.433Jay was healthy enough to play, wasn't he? TALLIS::SNDCSL::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Mon Dec 30 1991 19:068
    
    I don't care how lousy Schroeder was down the stretch, there was no way 
    Marinovitch should have got the start..  seeing as little offense was 
    required to win the game I think Jay would have won it for the Raiders.
    
    Oh, well.. who am I to second guess Art Shell?  
    
    /Jeff
40.434COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 30 1991 19:496
      I'm not sure if I was judging the boy,  I just basically showed that
    after his 1st game 2 weeks ago,  and alot of people made him out to
    be the next Stabler or Montana,  that he isn't.  He needs to prove
    himself before he is the faiders savior.
    
       Tim
40.435CAMONE::WAYWake up Mamma, turn your lamp down lowTue Dec 31 1991 09:243
Marinovich couldn't carry the Snake's jock.  He is SO overrated....

'Saw
40.436CSC32::SALZERTue Dec 31 1991 17:069
    The Raiders are probably at as low a point now as I've ever seen them.
    QB controversy still. Bo gone. Allen, as much as I even hate to say it,
    for all practical purposes is through. Howie couldn't finish. 
    They ended on a 4 game loosing streak including 2 at home. Defeated
    twice on monday night games. Next year they get a playoff team's 
    schedule again. It wasn't smart to expect snake II to pull their 
    butts out of a jam. Al would be wise to dummy up. 
    
    BoB 
40.437Induct Big Al in the H.O.F.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Thu Jan 02 1992 17:1316
    I think Shell (Davis?) did the right thing putting Marinovich in there.
    They had nothing to lose, Schroeder was choking miserably, at worst
    they lose in the playoffs (like Schroeder woulda probably done too) and
    the kid gets a little taste of the NFL since he will more than likely
    be replacing Jay as the starter next year, and at best he gets the
    offense going and they have a chance at winning it all. Just ask any of
    the donk fans and they'll tell you that there was no way Jay coulda
    took 'em to the big dance. :-) As far as Allen being through, the
    experts have been saying that for the last five years, except they
    forgot to tell Marcus. Besides, Nick Bell is the Raiders future @ RB,
    and he'll do just fine. I think you might be right about Howie being
    questionable though, sad to say. As far as Al dummying up, well, he's
    the football genius and we're just DEC employees. How are we gonna
    advise him, or how would it be if he came and advised you on your job?
    
    Carlos
40.438good move AlFRETZ::HEISERthe tone that goes CRUNCH!Tue Jan 14 1992 15:361
    Todd Marinovich will be the next Kenny "The Snake" Stabler!
40.439QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 17:027
    Right...  And Al Davis isn't connected to the MOB either...
    
    Not !!
    
    Big Game Junta !
    
    
40.440Al Davis in the HoF!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jan 14 1992 17:448
    >>QUASER::HUNTER "Steelers To The Super Bowl In `93" 
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Geeez Big-Shame, I know the doinks are an embarrasment and all, but if
    you was gonna change loyalties you coulda at least picked a real team
    like da Raiders.....:-)
    
    Carlitos
40.441COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 14 1992 19:342
      A real team like the raiders?   Thanks for the joke of the day
    Carlos!
40.442QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 19:398
     Great come back Tim...  
    
     Carlos,  I'm a man of my word.  I lost a little wager to FaKe
    and the P-Name is the outcome.  I wish others (MorT for example)
    would live up to their word as well.  Where are ya, T...  Didn't
    think you'ld be one to slack on a bet big guy...
    
    Big Game Junta
40.443GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Tue Jan 14 1992 20:305
    
    	I'm pretty sure MrT WON his bet.  The donks covered.  If'n
    	you don't believe me, check out Slashah's p-name.
    
    	Claybroon
40.444QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 21:085
     Oh Yea...  You're right, Clay...  I forgot the had an unmanly bet
    with a spread and all.  Sorry MorT...
    
    
    	Big Game (With foot in mouth, as usual)
40.445Just Keep on Winning Baby!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOGilligan,Gomer,Jethro,ElwayWed Jan 15 1992 13:0320
    Hey Tim and BG, will see how well the Doinks fare nexted year with a
    real schedule....look for a repeat of the '90 season. Big Ba(l)d John
    is ready for the pasture, he's getting injured more often (or so he
    says :-) and he's taking longer to heal, he's also lost a couple of
    steps in his dance (scrambling) routine, and his gun ain't what it used
    to be. I firmly believe that this season was likely his lasted chance
    at getting a ring....and of course he (and the rest of the team) choked.
    Like I said before, next years schedule will not be kind to the Donks,
    and two years from now Elway will fer sure have seen better days.
    Meanwhile the pride-and-poise boys will be tearing it up as usual (or
    should I say better than the usual of the lasted few years, but equal
    to the usual of the franchise's history). They've got a good blend of
    veterans (Howie,Marcus,Golic,Townsend,Lott,etc..) and up and coming
    youth (Marinovich,N.Bell,S.Davis,A.Smith,Wiesnewski,Glover,N.Harrison)
    which give them a solid nucleus. They've also got the 'Rocket' waiting
    in the wings (which may or may not happen). The point is that the
    Raiders future is looking real sweet while the Donks, with the decline
    of Elway, have nothing to look forward to except memories...HtH...:-)
    
    Carlos
40.446QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Wed Jan 15 1992 13:358
    
     Boy,  You sure have talked youself into beleiving that one haven't
    you, Carlos.  Can't wait for the Broncos to slam dance on the happless
    faiders next year.  Bet that'l wake you up a bit !!
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game
40.447ELMAGO::CGRIEGOGilligan,Gomer,Jethro,ElwayWed Jan 15 1992 14:042
    Kinda like they've slam danced on them the last 2.5 years BG......
    ...HaaaHaaa! Keep dreaming....
40.448says youCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Jan 15 1992 14:5616
      The boys of pride and poise?  Are you talking about 49'rs or skins?
    
      And this history stuff I have been hearing for 6 years,  but nothing
    has resembled that except last year.
    
      Yes the Broncos will have a tough schedule,  something the faids
    haven't seen in some time.  This year was the worst they had, and they
    only beat 1 winning team this year.  They beat the 49'rs when they were
    at or under .500!
    
      What does the faids schedule look like next year?  Do they play indy,
    tampa, green bay, vikes, and rams?   That should be cake!
    
    	Have a nice day,
    
    	Tim
40.449NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 15 1992 15:2411
    Actually, I like Elway's chances in the 1990s if and when he slows down 
    a bit and has to use his head and arm to get the job done, not his legs.  
    I honestly believe that in Elway's case the mobility and superior
    athletic ability has been a double-edged sword, helping the Broncos in
    the overall picture but hurting them against the cream of the crop
    defenses.  In NFL history, many QBs have really bloomed after the age 
    of 30...
    
    glenn
    
40.450BSS::JCOTANCHWed Jan 15 1992 15:5120
>    Actually, I like Elway's chances in the 1990s if and when he slows down 
>    a bit and has to use his head and arm to get the job done, not his legs.  
>    I honestly believe that in Elway's case the mobility and superior
>    athletic ability has been a double-edged sword, helping the Broncos in
>    the overall picture but hurting them against the cream of the crop
>    defenses.  
    
    I feel one of John's major weaknesses is that he flushes out of the
    pocket too soon.  And when he's trying to avoid would-be tacklers that
    takes away from his ability to spot the open receiver.  But whether
    that will make him a better passer is a doubt in my mind.  I don't
    think he would be a great pocket passer - a good portion of his big
    plays come when he runs or improvises after he eludes the rush.
    
    
    Joe
   
     
     
40.451'90 repeat for the DonksELMAGO::CGRIEGOGilligan,Gomer,Jethro,ElwayWed Jan 15 1992 19:0018
    >What does the faids schedule look like next year? Do they play Indy,
    >Tampa, Green Bay, Vikes, Rams?
    
    I wish....I think they play Washington, Dallas, Philly, and either the
    Giants or Cards, plus from the AFC they play Houston, Miami, Cincy, and
    Cleaveland......I think....? Plus their divisional rivals...including
    the doinks...now that's cake :-)
    
    By the way, when both of our teams schedules for last year were made
    two years ago, the Raiders had one of the tougher schedules (based on 
    their opponents records from the '90 season) and the Donks were given a
    schedule that was more at their level....lasted place! Next years
    schedule is based upon this years performance, so both the faids and
    the doinks will be playing against playoff caliber teams (I think), the
    Raiders are used to it and should do well, the doinks, well they'll
    try.....
    
    Carlos
40.453NaCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Jan 15 1992 20:4611
      I think this is our way of doing that Hawk.  You would be suprised at
    how many faider fans I get along with & party with ,etc...
    
      We usually harass each other about the teams and end up coming back
    to reality,  unlike in this electronic bar at times.
    
      I also think that these are the last "stabs" at each others teams
    before next season.  It will be quite in here compared to the last 4
    months.
    
    	Tim
40.454So there !LUNER::BROOKSFree MrT !Thu Jan 16 1992 11:351
    Besides, Elway still caint hold Randall's jock !
40.455Is he staging another "misunderstanding"?CTHQ2::LEARYLook what they've done to my song,MawThu Jan 16 1992 11:455
    Doc,
    Give us the low-down on this "Free T" business ( maybe in da junk note)
    
    MikeL
    
40.456ELMAGO::CGRIEGOGilligan,Gomer,Jethro,ElwayThu Jan 16 1992 11:4811
    I think Tim's right, we's just taking one last chance at the cheap
    shots before nexted season, it's all in good fun...
    
    As for the Raiders schedule next year, this is REALLY the way it is.
    They'll be at home against the Browns, Bills, Cowboys, and Giants and
    they'll be on the road against the Redskins, Dolphins, Eagles, and
    Bengals.....plus their regular home and away games against
    interdivisional rivals....not hardly cake by any stretch. How does the
    Donks schedule look???
    
    Carlos
40.457Obvious, LAR has easier scheduleREDRCK::AGUEJim AgueThu Jan 16 1992 12:0110
    Carlos,
    
    My guess is that Denver will be playing the same teams you listed that
    the Raiders are playing, except Denver will be playing against the
    Almighty Great Raiders, whereas the Raider team will get to play two
    games against the lower than whale dung in the ocean Denver Broncos.
    
    So by your standards, Raiders have an easier schedule!?
    
    -- Jim
40.458BSS::JCOTANCHThu Jan 16 1992 12:5510
    Denver's schedule for next year is nearly the same as the Faids'.
    
    Home games: NY Giants, NY Jets, Houston, Dallas, AFC West
    Away games: Philadelphia, Washington, Luckalo, Clevescum, AFC West
    
    Luckalo hasn't played in Denver since the '77 season.  
    
    
    Joe
        
40.459CNTROL::CHILDSThis note sure gone crazyThu Jan 16 1992 17:067
 Glen, I think you're assuming that John posses more mental capability. He
 doesn't. The nineties won't be any better...

 sad but true...

 mike
40.460VLAB::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Jan 24 1992 11:277
      Anyone see the Simpsons lasted night? Lisa was picking winners for
    Homer. I was on the floor after this one. The first 2 lines may not be
    exact, but the last one is.
    "I like the Dolphins, because they're pure of heart"...
    "I like the Seahawks because they strive for success"...
    "I like the Raiders because they cheat"!!
                                       Denny
40.461"Dad, I promise ya I'll never get tired of this"CNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationFri Jan 24 1992 11:495
 It was the 49ers who were pure of heart...yeah great episode. I was rolling
 my wife Bitching cause of Bart's cool present...

 mike
40.462NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 24 1992 12:2816
                                                  
    > Anyone see the Simpsons lasted night? Lisa was picking winners for
    > Homer. I was on the floor after this one. The first 2 lines may not be
    > exact, but the last one is.
    
    I read in SI last night that there'll be in an episode in February
    where Homer plays on an all-Star team with a collection of MLB stars
    (who do their own voices):  Roger, Wade, Straw, Jose, Mattingly, 
    Ozzie Smith, Steve Sax, Mike Scioscia, and Ken Griffey Jr.  They said
    something about how the players assume alternate personalities such
    that Darryl becomes a selfless, hustling team player and the like.
    Sounds like a can't-miss...
    
    glenn
    
    
40.463ELMAGO::CGRIEGOGilligan,Gomer,Jethro,ElwayMon Jan 27 1992 12:291
    Uncle Al, enshrined in the Hall of Fame!! News at 11:00....
40.464QUASER::HUNTERJaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !!Mon Jan 27 1992 15:476
    Most undeserving Appointment tot he HOF, EVER !!!
    Uncle Al's a Bum...
    
    ;^)
    
    BG
40.465ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Mon Jan 27 1992 16:0010
    Ahh contraire mon fraire! Uncle Al shoulda been inducted his first year
    of eligibility. If it tweren't for Al baby, there probably wouldn't be
    an NFL (AFC & NFC) as we know it today, nor a Superbowl (although the
    Bills and the Doinks probably wouldn't mind that). Or the NFL's first
    black head coach .....etc ...etc.
    
    The only reason he wasn't already inducted is not because of his
    contributions to the sport, but because he's also a shrewd businessman.
    
    Carlos
40.466BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jan 27 1992 16:063
    Al's deserving but he's still an asshole.
    
    Joe
40.467QUASER::HUNTERJaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !!Mon Jan 27 1992 16:293
    Well said, Joe... !! 
    
    
40.468ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Mon Feb 03 1992 12:574
    Corner back, Garry Lewis was traded to the Cowboys for an undisclosed
    draft pick. 
    
    Carlos
40.469Seriously !!QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareMon Feb 03 1992 20:377
    Carlos...  Thats a pretty heavy P-name you got there...  I think it
    could be considered a Political statement...   Mods,  What do you
    think??????
    
    JMHO,
    
    BG
40.470BIG AL IN THE HOF AT LASTWMOIS::FASSETT_EMon Feb 03 1992 21:071
    Does anyone have a list of who the Raiders made available for plan B.
40.471I don't care who you vote for!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Tue Feb 04 1992 14:1411
    Hey Big-Game, I'm not much of a politician nor is my P-name politically
    motivated, it's just my own personal opinion of how warped our
    societies morals have become. My P-name is perhaps a little graphic and
    disturbing, but then again so is the actual act of taking an innocent
    life. If the mods feel that it's inappropriate for this conference I'll
    change it.......maybe even back to "Gomer,Gilligan,Jethro,Elway"....
    of course that might be considered libelous (sp?) though....hmmm?
    Can't win, can I.
    
    Carlos
    
40.472Plan B unprotectedELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Tue Feb 04 1992 14:239
    The Raiders left the following 15 players unprotected:
    
    Tom Benson lb, Roger Craig rb, Derrick Crudup s, Mike Dyal te,
    Vince Evans qb, James FitzPatrick g, Rory Graves t, Roy Hart dt,
    Jaimie Holland wr, Tahaun Lewis cb, Napolean McCallum rb, 
    Reggie McElroy t, Vance Mueller rb, Joel Patten t, and 
    Jerry Robinson lb.
    
    Carlos
40.473CSC32::P_PAPACEKTue Feb 04 1992 15:2516
    
    Hey Carlos, I agree with you.   If we start regulating p-names its time
    to close up shop.   If I looked long enough I could probably find
    something offensive about many p-names.   Unless they contain
    expletives or personal attacks most are ok and show some individuality. 
    As for Big Game, well what would the animal rights groups think about 
    hunting.   
                
    Lets not censor to the point of being ridiculous, or we'll all be
    nothing but proper names and node addresses.
    
    JMHO,
    
    Pat
    
   
40.474CAMONE::WAYCuimhnich, 13 February 1692Tue Feb 04 1992 15:3315
I can't speak for the other moderators, but I personally have no problem
with p-names.  If anything, they are probably the highest form of
personal expression in notes.

As long as a p-name doesn't cast aspersions on a person or group, 
as long as it is not blatantly filthy in terms of language, it's okay.


And besides, I will remind everyone once again that we ARE all adults,
capable of knowing what is "rignt and wrong", and of knowing how
not to offend others.


JMHO,
'Saw
40.475FRETZ::HEISERhope set highTue Feb 04 1992 15:375
>And besides, I will remind everyone once again that we ARE all adults,
>capable of knowing what is "rignt and wrong", and of knowing how
>not to offend others.
    
    JD will just start a pro-choice p_n when he sees it.
40.476ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Tue Feb 04 1992 16:093
    Thanks Pat and Frank.
    
    Carlos
40.477CSOA1::BACHHe's Ghust &lt;Sic&gt;Tue Feb 04 1992 16:241
    thump thump thump
40.478LUNER::BROOKSRugby and C.Applegate r 4 nerds!Tue Feb 04 1992 16:331
    This one is for you Saw ! :-)
40.479CAMONE::WAYCuimhnich, 13 February 1692Tue Feb 04 1992 17:227
>    This one is for you Saw ! :-)


Do me one about Meg Ryan and then *I'LL* smile   ;^)


'Saw
40.480QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareTue Feb 04 1992 20:485
    
     Wow !!  Didn't mean to stir the pot that deeply...  Maybe I'll start
    a pro choice p-Name...  
    
    BG
40.481Raiders are becoming a 49'er retirement home ?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Tue Feb 11 1992 18:4320
    Last week sometime there was this little article in the local
    Albuquerque rag about Uncle Al and company going after Steve Young,
    has anybody else heard anything (or anything more) about this. 
    
    Young would be a good addition to the Raiders (he wouldn't be my first
    choice, but...), he couldn't do much worse than Schredder did last year
    huh? And I don't think Marinovich is quite ready *yet*. I do however
    believe that if he (T.M.)were to get the call he could carry the team but
    there would no doubt be many beginner mistakes as witnessed in the
    playoff game against K.C.. The acquisition of Young would give the
    Raiders a solid QB, allow the Raiders to trade Schredder while it's
    still possible for them to get something for him (haa!), and allow
    Marinovich a little bit more time to develop. Then again, I kinda think
    that if Marinovich just gets thrown right into the middle of things he
    will develop even faster, he'll have no choice (the old sink or swim
    theory). In which case the Raids could spend their money on some OL's
    or Dl's instead of Young, and keep Schredder as the backup, which is
    right up his alley......
    
    Carlos
40.482COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Feb 11 1992 20:514
      Uncle Al must like the lefties....  Young would make the faids big
    contenders IMO ;-(
    
    	Tim
40.483Poor match - try KC ...LUNER::BROOKSYou down wit MSG ?Wed Feb 12 1992 04:116
    Foget it Carlos, the Niners are looking for a RB, preferably a big
    power back. 
    
    What will LA do, trade Craig back to the Niners ? :-)
    
    Doc
40.484Young to the Raiders or KC are both possible.WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Wed Feb 12 1992 06:0615
    RE -1:

        Actually they are more interested in the DB position. They are also
    looking for more draft choices in the earlier rounds this year so a
    Steve Young trade for a couple of top Raider picks may not be out of
    the question. With those draft picks they would look to acquire talented
    DB's and talented running back in this years draft.

        As for Craig (I saw the smiley face).....He could be back with the
    49ers in a couple of years. But only as a coach. As far as using him as
    a running back if it was me I wouldn't do it. He just hasn't got that
    move or burst anymore like he used to (also seems to have picked up
    fumble_itis).  :^)

                                                   Night Flier      ~~v~~
40.485ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Wed Feb 12 1992 14:3025
      >  Foget it Carlos, the Niners are looking for a RB, preferably a big
      >  power back.
      >
      >  What will LA do, trade Craig back to the Niners ? :-) 
    
      Well Doc, the Raiders do have Nick Bell, and they don't come any 
      bigger or more powerful than him, but I hardly think that Uncle
      Al would even entertain the thought of trading him away....
      ...even for big Joe. This guy is the Raiders future as far as the
      running game goes, he's like 6'2", 254lbs, can run the 40 in 4.45,
      and to top it off he can catch. I'd like to see the Raiders get 
      another RB that's smaller and can fly around the outside as well as 
      cut and weave, just to compliment Bell ala Okoye and Williams. But
      again, don't count on the Raiders trading this kid away. They also
      have Napolean McCallum, who's a pretty big, power back, and this is 
      alot more feasable, although I don't know if the 49'ers would think
      so. As far as Craig goes, well he did lead the Raiders last year in 
      rushing yardage, but only because of injuries to Allen and Bell. And
      although Roger is only a shadow of his former self, he still can be
      very effective if he isn't used as the workhorse. If the Raiders can 
      keep Steve Smith, Nick Bell, Marcus Allen, and Roger Craig healthy
      next year, other teams (IMHO) will have a difficult time stopping the 
      run.
    
      Carlos
40.486Reborn As A Raider???SALEM::HARRIS_KTue Feb 18 1992 16:058
    The Raiders have reached agreement with Aundrey Bruce, the former #1
    overall pick in '88?, on a one year contract. Every year they go after
    LB's in plan B realing their need for them, however they never seem to
    draft them. Aarron Wallace being the exception. I would love to see
    them draft Eric Anderson from Michigan, he reminds me of Chris
    Spielman.
    
    Kenn
40.487ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Wed Feb 19 1992 16:1011
    Hey Kennn, who did Aundrey Bruce play for before??? 
    
    I agree with you, about the Raiders needing to go after a couple
    of solid 'young' LB's in the draft, although last year they did pick 
    up a solid linebacker in Winston Moss, on a trade with Tampa Bay.
    
    They could also use a little more youth in the DL. Golic and Long
    are some of the best in the business, but they're startng to feel
    the effects of age, especially towards the end of the season.
    
    Carlos
40.488Played for the FalconsSALEM::HARRIS_KThu Feb 20 1992 11:3418
    Carlos,
             Bruce played for Auburn in College and was drafted #1 overall
    by the Falcons. He never really panned out for the Falcons for whatever
    reason at LB so they moved him to TE. Needless to say the Red Gun
    offense does not use a TE so they put him on plan B. There was talk in
    the b papers yesterday that the Raiders were interested in Carl Zander
    from the bengals and EJ Junior from the Dolphins. Neither of them does
    much for me. 
             I agree with thefact that they need some youth on the line
    however I feel they can address this next year. They have enough depth
    to last them for at least another year.
             I don't understand their decision of trading Gary Lewis. He
    was a solid nickle back. Are we going to have to Torn Dorn get burnt
    all year again??????
    
    Kenn
    
    BTW- I loved the trade for Winston Moss last year!
40.489ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Mar 17 1992 13:2411
    Roger Craig signed with the Vikings either yesterday or today. 
    While he wasn't outstanding during his brief career with the Raiders,
    he did lead them in rushing yards last year, and did pretty good
    considering the way he was thrown in after Marcus Allen, and Nick Bell
    were injured. He pretty much was the Raiders rushing attack, despite 
    his unfamiliarity with the Raiders' offensive scheme, for the beginning
    of the season. I think he'll do well in Minnesota.
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.490Plan BELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Apr 07 1992 14:1325
    Other Plan B deals that are Raider related:
     
    Mike Dyal, TE, signed with KC. You might recall Dyal was beginning to
    show signs of being a most excellent tight end before he was injured a
    couple of years back. If he recovers fully, he'll be a good pickup for
    the chiefs.
    Tahaun Lewis, CB, also signed with the chiefs.
    
    Roy Hart, DT, was a WLAF pickup of the Raiders last year. He spent most
    of the year on IR, and played sparingly in the last game or two. He
    signed with the Jets.
    
    On the other hand, these are Raider Plan B signings:
    
    Aundray Bruce, LB  (of course)
    Anthony Bell, LB, former #1 draft pick of the Cardinals, and played
    with the Lions last year. 
    (Anthony??) Dilwig, QB, another former #1 pick who played lasted year
    with the Packers.
    
    That's all I can remember right off the top, nobody really spectacular,
    like in previous years, but maybe some of these guys will be able to
    come in and contribute ala Winston Moss or something?
    
    Carlos 
40.491PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Apr 15 1992 15:022
    It has been reported that Todd Marinovich tested positive for drug use
    following the Raiders' last playoff game.
40.492since he denied it, it must be true?HBAHBA::HAASMental ModelWed Apr 15 1992 16:206
Marinovich, through his agent, has denied the report.

This is one of those cases wherein the media, in this case ESPN, cited
"unnamed league sources".

TTom
40.493Frosty the snowman, had a very red nose...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Apr 15 1992 18:369
    A spokeswoman for the Raiders said that those who might comment were
    either out of town or unavailable. What I'm wondering is, if it's true
    why has it taken this long for anything to be said about it? It wasn't
    reported what drug was being abused either, but everybody knows about  
    Marinovich's past abuse of coke and marijuana. Also, you'd think that
    if the kid was all coked up the Raiders would've killed the Chiefs....
    ...or maybe that's just a myth.
    
    Carlos
40.494last gameHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelWed Apr 15 1992 18:4410
Supposedly it was after the last game that he tested positive.

The news story said that he had an incentive clause - bonus, if you will
- if'n he stayed cleaned. Also, he's open for testing almost daily by
terms of his contract.

Meanwhile, the Raiders have Anthony Dilweg in camp and are actively
searching for more QBs.

TTom
40.495Incentive clause!...Unreal!SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 15 1992 19:182
       "we'll give you more dough if you don't do drugs!"
                                 Denny
40.496BSS::JCOTANCHWed Apr 15 1992 19:555
>    What I'm wondering is, if it's true
>    why has it taken this long for anything to be said about it? 

    I was wondering the same thing.

40.497Why so long?SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 15 1992 19:592
       The leagues 'drug policy' is supposed to be confidentail.
                                 Denny
40.498COMET::JACKSONTAHangManWed Apr 15 1992 21:591
    re-1  Only for Joe Montana;^
40.499Not a #1SALEM::DODAOn the jelly donut and Pez DietMon Apr 20 1992 18:323
Dilweg was GB #2 pick, 3 years ago.

daryll
40.500ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Apr 20 1992 20:246
    Re: Dilweg
    
    I thought I seen him playing yesterday for the Montreal WLAF team?
    If it was him, he wasn't very impressive...
    
    Carlos
40.501COMET::JACKSONTAHangManTue Apr 21 1992 15:013
      re- 1 Then Dilweg will fit right in with the faiders;^)))
    
    	Tim
40.502Alcohol Related?????SALEM::HARRIS_KWed Apr 22 1992 10:5312
    Delwig is playing for Montreal. Will McDonough reported in the Boston
    Globe that Marinovich is rumored to be suffering from an alcohol
    related problem. Which under league rules is handled the same as a
    "drug problem", to my knowledge. Supposedly he spent 4 weeks in a rehab
    center and is going to serve another 2 weeks in AA classes. 
    
    ESPN's, Mel Kiper reported that the Raiders are interested in taking
    Carl Pickens, WR Tenn., in the first round of the draft. I like
    Pickens, however I feel that the Raiders need help at LB, DB and OL.
    Any other rumors????
    
    Kenn
40.503SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Apr 22 1992 11:484
       ESPN or somebody also had a report over the weekend that the Raiders
    were interested in Klingler too. Marinovich may be a bust. Caint do
    them any good if he keeps getting suspended.
                                Denny
40.504DraftSALEM::HARRIS_KFri Apr 24 1992 14:476
    The USA today had 2 mock drafts in it: Mel Kiper has the Raiders taking
    Carl Pickens WR Tenn. and Gordon Forbes has them taking DAle Carter DB
    Tenn. The Carter pick would seem to make more sense than Pickens, due
    to Ronnie Lotts age. 
    
    Kenn
40.505ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Apr 24 1992 21:066
    Well, my most recent edition of Raider news also had a mock draft,
    and they figure the Raiders will try to get some OL help. They've got
    the Raiders picking 6'6" 300lbs. OT, Ray Roberts....if he's still
    available.
    
    Carlos 
40.506Who Knows?SALEM::HARRIS_KSat Apr 25 1992 12:566
    Most of the draft notes I've been reading have stated that Roberts is 
    either going to be a star or a bust. They say he looks like a stiff in
    one game film and a star in another. One thing about the Raiders, they
    keep us guessing before the draft.
    
    Kenn
40.507FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Sat Apr 25 1992 13:554
    The number one rule of the Draft is never tell anyone what you're
    really thinking.  It's a great big poker game.
    
    John
40.508ELMAGO::CGRIEGOSat Apr 25 1992 14:166
    Another thing about the Raiders and the draft...they usually try to get 
    the best player available instead of trying to fill their needs. 
    
    Carlos    (who'd kinda like to see the Raiders take a chance on Detmer)
    
    
40.509ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Apr 27 1992 14:3015
    The Raiders picked Chester McGlockton, DL, Clemson, 6-4, 337lbs. with
    their first round choice. They also traded their 4th & 8th round picks
    to the Colts for Dickerson. Last year McGlockton had 7 sacks, and led
    the team with 17 QB pressures. I think this selection was a good one
    for the Raiders, especially since they play four games a year against
    two teams that have huge running backs that like to run right over the
    middle, (Chiefs & Chargers) also I'm kinda looking forward to watching
    this guy bounce on top of Mr. Ed a few times. :-) I also like the
    Dickerson trade, Eric's been saving himself for something....hopefully
    this is it. Anybody know who else the Raiders picked up from the second
    round on?
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.510Draft NotesSALEM::HARRIS_KMon Apr 27 1992 14:3521
    The Raiders obtained Eric Dickerson from Indy. for a 4th and a 8th
    round pick. I'm not a big Dickerson fan, however I think it was a good
    move for the price they had to pay. They drafted three players in the
    first five rounds:
    1st rnd. (16th pick)- Chester Mcglockton DT Clemson. 6-3 7/8 337lbs.
    This kid is a monster! He was rated very high on most charts.
    
    2nd rnd. (32nd pick aquired in a trade with TB for their 2nd,3rd and
    7th round picks)- GReg Skrepenak OT Michigan. 6-6 1/4 317lbs. stock
    dropped drastically before the draft because of poor workouts. Worth a
    gamble I think. They need OL.
    
    5th rnd. (128 pick)- Derrick Hoskins DB S. Miss. 6-3 1/4 201lbs. Good
    on speacial teams. Has good speed. ( so the paper says!)
    
    ESPN was reporting that the 49ers were offering Steve young to the
    Raiders for their 1st & 2nd round picks along with Tim Brown. NOT!
    I would have liked to see them get Young but I don't want to see them
    get rid of Brown.
    
    Kenn
40.511LUNER::BROOKSPrince &gt; MadonnaMon Apr 27 1992 15:038
    Woah ! The Raiders got Dickerson for only a 4th and 8th rounder ? No
    conditional picks ?
    
    What a steal ....
    
    As for Young, he's good, but a #1, #2, and Brown ?
    
    Be for real ...
40.512Raiders in the AFC, Dallas in the NFC :-)POPE::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Apr 27 1992 15:0614
    Dickerson has always got a bad rap (rep) everywhere he was.  Maybe
    he deserved it but in this latest move he gave up about 50% or his
    income.  So the one thing people can no longer lable him with is
    being greedy.  Before the last 2 or 3 seasons he was average I
    believe around 1400yrds/per/season (I think it was this high but Im
    not positive).  The last 3 saesons have not been very productive but
    he did run behind the worst OL in football.  The Raiders might be what 
    dickerson has been looking for and hopefully viceversa as well.  Being
    a Dickerson Fan (Almost gave up on him but Ill give him one more year)
    Im looking forward to being a raider fan this year.....
    
    Of course they still have a QB problem it appears.... :-(
    
    							GO RAIDERS
40.513DECWET::METZGERWe'll always have Paris.Mon Apr 27 1992 21:199
Why trade for dickerson when you've got a young stud like Nick Bell ready to 
lead the league in rushing next year? The Raiders will cut Allen or use him 
sparingly next year to punish him for his contract holdouts. DIckerson and 
Allen will both be backing up Bell by the 2nd week of the season.

Granted they got him for cheap but why? 

Metz
40.514BSS::JCOTANCHMon Apr 27 1992 21:289
> Why trade for dickerson when you've got a young stud like Nick Bell ready to 
> lead the league in rushing next year? 

    Because the Raiders like to collect old, washed-up players who used to
    be stars.
    
    :^)
    Joe     
40.515EARRTH::BROOKSPrince &gt; MadonnaMon Apr 27 1992 21:283
    Bell will be a Pro Bowler, but he doesn't have any real speed to the
    outside, IMO. I can't see Bell being a breakaway threat - not in the
    Dickerson class. 
40.516DECWET::METZGERWe'll always have Paris.Mon Apr 27 1992 21:438
He may not have Dickerson's speed but he's definately got enough speed to 
turn the corner. The big question is why trade for Dickerson at all?

Is eric the great going to be happy playing 2nd string and carrying 10 times
a game and watching Bell carry 25 times a game (which he should be )

Metz
40.517$ .02ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Apr 27 1992 21:5214
    >>Because the Raiders like to collect old, washed-up players who
    >>used to be stars.
    
    Yeah, like Ronnie Lott, Max Montoya, Bob Golic....just to name a few,
    these guy's are all washed up huh Joe?
    
    And to answer the 'why Dickerson at all' question. Lasted year, the way
    the Raiders liked to use Bell was during the second half after Roger
    Craig, Steve Smith and Co. tired the opposing teams defense, then
    they'd send in the heavy artillery which was pretty effective. At least
    when Bell was healthy.
    
    Carlos
    
40.518injuries, suspensionsCNTROL::CHILDSAnybody but the LakersTue Apr 28 1992 13:489
 It may have only been a 4th and 8th but they also got to pay Eric 1.5 mill
 so he didn't come that cheap. If Eric gets motivate and plays again it's
 a good move. Bell's an FB so they should complement one another well. Marcus
 deserves more respect but unfortunately this is a business and he isn't getting
 any younger.

 Dickerson should be able to play for quite a few more years seeing ow he hasn't
 played the last two...;^)
40.519I know allen is older buy how much ?POPE::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Apr 28 1992 14:133
    How much older is marcus allen compared to Dickerson ????
    
    							MaB
40.520COMET::JACKSONTAHangManTue Apr 28 1992 15:2212
      Dickerson was probably brought in 'cause Marcus plays (doesn't play)
    hurt every year.  Didn't he sit out about 1/2 the season last year?
    
      Dickerson might help them,  but then again, his attitude will
    probably get in the way,  and thats if he shows up for camp;^
    
      Gee, to bad Craig didn't stick around,  that would have been uncle
    AL's dream backfield, a few years ago anyway!
    
      All this won't matter unless one of the QB's step up their play.
    
    	Tim
40.521Can't complainCTHQ2::CURRIERuss Currie (227-3909)Tue Apr 28 1992 15:538
     I was going to jump on the "bash Eric" bandwagon, but I think that
    this might end up being a real good move for the Raiders. In Indy, Eric
    was always criticized for not playing the way the coaches wanted to see
    him used (over the middle passes, etc...). I think that Shell's
    IN-YOUR-FACE style of football will allow Eric to be used the way that
    he likes to play the game. Meaning, give him the ball and let him run.
    
    Condo
40.522Dickerson and Draft Info.SALEM::HARRIS_KTue Apr 28 1992 16:1619
    Carlos hit it right on the nose. Bell comes in in the second half after
    teams are worn down. I would rather see Bell play the whole game, but
    that is not the way the Raiders use there backs. I think it was a good
    move, because last year, Marcus and Bell were both injured and the
    Raiders had to rely upon Craig. If this kid Skrepenak steps up and
    plays a decent left tackle, their line will be pretty solid. I think 
    Marinovich will do just fine (if he doesn't keep screwing up with the
    DRUGS). 
    
    Other Raider draft picks were:
    
    6th round 156th pick- Tony Rowell C Florida
    7th round 185th pick- Kevin Smith RB UCLA
    10th round 268th pick- Alberto White LB Texas So.
    12th round 324th pick- Tom Roth G Georgia So.
    
    Why Draft Kevin Smith (RB) over Eric Anderson LB from Michigan??? Every
    time I've seen Anderson play he looked great. He reminds me of the kid
    Spielman from Detroit. 
40.523Mark my words!SHALOT::MEDVIDWho's got segmented eyes?Tue Apr 28 1992 16:216
    Dickerson, who took a cut in pay to play for the Raiders, will turn in
    an excellent and productive year...perhaps one close to his Rams
    days...and hold out next year because he'll want to be paid his
    "worth."
    
    	--dan'l
40.524EARRTH::BROOKSPrince &gt; MadonnaTue Apr 28 1992 17:3424
    re .523
    
    Hmmm ... that's a thought.
    
    IMO,
    This is a good move for the Raiders because :
    
    1) Dickerson will be ready to play because he wants to get into a Super
    Bowl **badly**, and on a contending team like LA, he'll toe the line.
    
    2) Art Shell (unlike Meyer) will not tolerate any crap from Eric, and
    neither will the vets.
    
    3) He's healthy, has not taken many knocks over the last two years, and
    no matter what you say about him - he always comes to camp in shape.
    
    I feel bad for Marcus Allen, one of the most complete backs this game
    has ever seen. I think he'll probably come off the bench as a 3rd down
    back, play some FB, and spell Dickerson. But he is 35, and has taken a
    lot of hits. Less is more in the case of Allen. Bell's PT will also depend 
    on his willingness/ability to block.
    
    Doc
    his blocking. He and Dickersop
40.525COMET::JACKSONTAHangManTue Apr 28 1992 20:395
      Dickerson has had hamstring problems.  When he stayed out of camp a
    couple of years ago,  he pulled a hamstring and then never really
    recovered from it, IMMSMR.
    
    	Tim
40.526They will have an awsome running attack, now how about airPOPE::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Apr 29 1992 12:1010
    Yes but how much was due to the Hamstring and how much was due to
    the team he was on.  Here's a top notch running back, traded to a
    1/2 way decent team that does nothing but go down hill.  They have
    no Offensive line and they want him to run 30+ times a game for what
    2yrds a whack if hes lucky.  The O-line was collapsed before he got
    the ball...... Id get a little frustrated and sit down an extra long
    time with each injury under those circumstances.  We will have to
    wait and see... But if the Raiders QB's work out they will at least
    win there division....
    							MAB
40.527RUGBY1::wayAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownWed Apr 29 1992 12:3718
Ah, remember the good old days, when athletes were payed peanuts, 
and played with heinous injuries because they loved the game....


I remember Bart Starr playing one time with torn abdominal muscles.
He couldn't straighten all the way up to throw, but went out, sucked it
up and got it done.   AFter the game, Lombardi wanted to know why he
couldn't straighten up, and Starr finally told him....


Today's stars are prima donnas.  Lots of running backs have had sieve-like
lines in front of them.  Some have toiled their entire careers behind
such travesties.

Dickerson is a big baby.....


'Saw
40.528SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Apr 29 1992 12:394
       I have no respect for guys like Dickerson. The guy refused to play,
    yet still expected to be paid. I'm not saying he wasn't good, but his
    'goodness' is totally past tense.
                                       Denny
40.529MONGUS::BRYDIEThat's when I reach for my revolverWed Apr 29 1992 13:4117
 >> Ah, remember the good old days, when athletes were payed peanuts, 
 >> and played with heinous injuries because they loved the game....

    That's why guys like Jim Otto wake up in pain every morning of their
    lives. And they didn't just play wih injuries because they loved the 
    game they also did it because it was expected and players still play hurt 
    today. I have no problem with someone not playing due to an injury esp-
    ecially nowadays with the money that they make. The problem I have with 
    Dickerson is that he faked his injuries because he didn't want to play 
    behind an inferior o-line. Eric could have gone down as the best ever 
    instead he'll always be remembered as a head case and a primi dona. But 
    the Raiders have a tradition of turning other teams' problem players 
    into their stars so he may do well in LA.
    
    
    _Tommy
40.530What can you do, kick him when hes down...RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Apr 29 1992 13:5614
    Oh and no one in here as ever called in sick becasue they didnt
    feel like working that day... PPPPPAAAAA LLLLELEEEAAAASSSSEEE.
    
    You dont know what was going on with the coaching staff, the other
    players, the front office, his agent, his family, his financial
    endeavors.  People are so quick to jump on people when there down.
    Yes hes overpaid but they all are from the lowly specials teams to
    the Star QB none of them are worth what there paid.  And again how
    can you say anything about money when we was willing to take a 50%
    pay cut to get out of indy and play for a decent team ???  This is
    a job to him remember.  It takes guts to take a 50% cut in pay to
    work for someone/someplace where youll be happier, could you do it.
    
    							M.Air.Brooks
40.531MONGUS::BRYDIEThat's when I reach for my revolverWed Apr 29 1992 14:3729
 >>   Oh and no one in here as ever called in sick becasue they didnt
 >>   feel like working that day... PPPPPAAAAA LLLLELEEEAAAASSSSEEE.
   
      So basically Brooksie, you're equating some guy who makes over a 
      million dollars a year to play a game and has six months of the year 
      off and then fakes an injury because he's not happy with some schmo who 
      works at DEC and wants to go fishing instead of work but doesn''t have 
      any vacation time left. PPPPPAAAAA LLLLELEEEAAAASSSSEEE. 

 >>   You dont know what was going on with the coaching staff, the other
 >>   players, the front office, his agent, his family, his financial
 >>   endeavors.  People are so quick to jump on people when there down.
 >>   Yes hes overpaid but they all are from the lowly specials teams to
 >>   the Star QB none of them are worth what there paid.  And again how
 >>   can you say anything about money when we was willing to take a 50%
 >>   pay cut to get out of indy and play for a decent team ???  This is
 >>   a job to him remember.  It takes guts to take a 50% cut in pay to
 >>   work for someone/someplace where youll be happier, could you do it.
   
      Eric has worn out his welcome everywhere he's gone and how do you
      figure he's down ? He's brought all of this on himself. He signs 
      contracts and then doesn't want to hold up his end. He demands trades 
      and then becomes a problem for the team he's traded to. He doesn't like 
      his offensive line so he fakes an injury. He had no choice but to take a 
      pay cut. He lives in LA he wanted to play there but LA wasn't going to
      pay him what Indy did and nobody else wanted a head case on their
      team.
    
40.532SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Apr 29 1992 14:466
    ...what Tommy said! Eric flat out didn't wanna play. It's fine and
    dandy to take a pay cut from Uncle Al. But I'll wait and see what
    happens in LA. I've got no use for guys like Dickerson. Comparing it to
    calling in sick at DEC is a BIG reach!
                                     Denny
    
40.533I always take legitimate sick daysCNTROL::CHILDSwill forgive us now, for wasting the dawnWed Apr 29 1992 15:577
 let see Eric fakes injury doesn't play. Joe Shmoo DEC superTechnowennie
 calls in sick and goes golfing.....

 sounds the same to me Denny?????

  ;^) many hhaaa
40.534Last chanceMCIS2::CLAYBROOKWed Apr 29 1992 16:077
    I think Eric's attitude will change quickly when he gets to L.A. or
    he'll get his butt kicked. Howie Long, Ronnie Lott, Bob Golic, just 
    to name a few. If he still developes an attitude then his playing 
    days are done. I think this is his last chance.
    
                                                       Dan
    
40.535SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Apr 29 1992 16:135
       Lets see, Eric 'works' 6 months a year, 1 game per week and 3-4 days
    of practice (when he shows up). I'll have to axe my boss if I cain
    change my schedule. This 220+ day work year (plus MANY Saturdays) makes
    me feel like I'm not getting as good a deal as ol' Eric!
                                    Denny
40.536COMET::JACKSONTAHangManWed Apr 29 1992 16:2611
      Dickerson is the first part of his last name.  Things may work out, 
    but probably not if he rides the pine more than Allen & Bell.
    
      Uncle Al put himself in the position that if Eric doesn't work out, 
    he will most likely have to waive him, because who in there right mind
    would want to trade for him?
    
      This is Bickerson's last year, if he lasts that long.  Of course this
    is JMO.
    
    	Tim
40.537CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownWed Apr 29 1992 17:0412
Dickerson is, plain and simple, a prima donna.

I'll give Tommy the guys like Otto, but I also have no use for someone
who makes that kind of money and is a baby becuause his offensive line
couldn't move my dead grandmother out of the way.


Calling in sick at DEC when you aren't and faking an injury when you're
a pro ball player are two completely different things.....


'Saw
40.538Look a Little FartherDCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEWed Apr 29 1992 17:0915
    I don't know.....did Dickerson really whine that much when he was with
    the Rams?
    
    Knowing the talent he had, it must have eaten him up to play for such a
    bad football team as the Colts. The bad trades, bad drafts, Ron
    Meyer... so he decided to speak up. It sounds awful coming from a guy
    who makes so much but maybe there was a grain of truth in what he was
    trying to say.
    
    Admittedly, Dickerson lacks the class of an OJ Simpson who labored for
    years on a mostly cruddy football team while being quiet, but I think
    there is more to Dickerson than meets the eye.
    
    Rich
    
40.539IndeedSHALOT::HUNTHappy Happy, Joy JoyWed Apr 29 1992 17:2411
40.540SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Apr 29 1992 17:473
       Ron Meyer was Eric the Dead's college coach. They liked each
    other...until Meyer got tired of his act.
                                    Denny
40.541The Ice Bowl was only fun if you watched it on TVLUNER::BROOKSTwentyfive or 6 to 4 ...Wed Apr 29 1992 18:017
    re .527
    
    Saw, your romantic view of the game is touching, but dated. It's no
    wonder that studies show that the lifespan of an NFL player maybe at
    least 5 years below the norm ...
    
    Doc
40.542LUNER::BROOKSTwentyfive or 6 to 4 ...Wed Apr 29 1992 18:0610
    re .538
    
    Well put. The Juice had class, and played in exactly ONE playoff game.
    One gets the feeling, he trade some of it for a chance to run on a
    consistent contender. Dickerson is no saint, but 1) you have to give
    him points for honesty - when the Colts traded Hinton and Rison for
    George, the Colts were assured of being a medicore team for at least 5
    more years, and 2) I can also understand wanting to win one before he
    has to hang 'em up.
    
40.543RUGBY1::wayAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownWed Apr 29 1992 18:088
Doc, you have a point, I won't deny that.   In the meantime however,
medicine and medical techniques have improved a lot more too.


I just don't like Dickerson's attitude.....


'Saw
40.544Broncs will rule AFC West in 1992QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareWed Apr 29 1992 19:176
    Well,  Going to the L.A. faiders ain't gonna get Dickerson the win
    He's looking for.  This is a has been team (The Raiders) and it's
    gonna take time to build them back into a winner...  Dickerson doesn't
    have that kinda time !!
    
    Big Game
40.545ONe Job Id love tohaveFNATCL::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Apr 29 1992 19:2224
    None of them play hurt anymore, unless they have gurenteed contracts.
    And Dickerson is one of 100% of the NFL Cry Babies that want gurenteed
    money and contracts and playing time, etc, etc, etc.  No big surprise
    here.  And if any of you out there really think that the NFL is a part
    time job your sadly mistaken.  The competition gets greater and greater
    every year and more talant is produced each year.  If you dont spend
    time in the gym and train year round you'll be out of a job.  Some
    people are lucky enough to have a metabolism that they can eat and do
    what ever they want and stay in shape but somehting tells me that to
    be a top notch Running Back in the NFL you have to do a little extra.
    
    You try running the 40 in 4.## seconds,  Most people in this notes file
    would more then likely have to jump off a 40 yrd cliff in order to
    cover that much distance in 4.## seconds :-)
    
    Does if have an Attitude problem, of course.  Do any of the big name
    players not... NOT. Some of them just let there agents do all there
    dirty work (talk).  Nice guys finish last.  And its all in prespective
    These guys do make too much money but remember they have a gift, and
    there using it.  As far as im concearned there's alot of people in dec
    that make more money then there worth, but Id take it if I could get it
    so OH WELL.  And you cant think of it as a game, its a business and a
    job........
    								MaB
40.546Can you say 9-7 ?LUNER::BROOKSTwentyfive or 6 to 4 ...Wed Apr 29 1992 19:299
    re .544
    
    Little Lame, the DOnks play a first place scheudle this year.
    
    They are toast.
    
    Hunter Tried Hard,
    
    Doc
40.547QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareWed Apr 29 1992 19:427
    yea doc...  I can say 9-7...  That should be about where the Faiders 
    end up.  The Donks on the other hand should do well and will make the
    `offs with a first round bye...  
    
    Donks and Dallas in the SB
    
    Big Game
40.548I love itCOMET::JACKSONTAHangManWed Apr 29 1992 22:071
    
40.549Denver= 3rd place!SALEM::HARRIS_KThu Apr 30 1992 11:198
    This team of has beens seemed to fare pretty well against your Bronc's
    last year. The Raiders have added some solid young talent to an aging
    team. Anthony Smith and Nolan Harrison look to be good young players.
    Aarron Wallace will be given a chance to strut his stuff this year.
    I look forward all off-season to the Raider-Bronco match ups. I see KC
    andthe Raiders finishing ahead of Denver.
    
    Kenn
40.5501992ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu May 21 1992 18:4141
     Here's a look at the Raiders schedule for the year, as well as my 
    opinion on how they'll do:


TEAM:           Los Angeles Raiders
 
Date/Time       PST/PDT  TV     Opponent                Location
---------       -------  --     --------                --------
Sun  6 Sep 92    17:00  TNT     Denver Broncos          Denver, CO
Sun 13 Sep 92    10:00  NBC     Cincinnati Bengals      Cincinnati, OH
Sun 20 Sep 92    13:00  NBC     Cleveland Browns        Los Angeles, CA
Mon 28 Sep 92    18:00  ABC     Kansas City Chiefs      Kansas City, MO
Sun  4 Oct 92    13:00  CBS     New York Giants         Los Angeles, CA
Sun 11 Oct 92    13:00  NBC     Buffalo Bills           Los Angeles, CA
Sun 18 Oct 92    13:00  NBC     Seattle Seahawks        Seattle, WA
Sun 25 Oct 92    13:00  CBS     Dallas Cowboys          Los Angeles, CA
Sun  1 Nov 92                   BYE
Sun  8 Nov 92    10:00  NBC     Philadelphia Eagles     Philadelphia, PA
Sun 15 Nov 92    13:00  NBC     Seattle Seahawks        Los Angeles, CA
Sun 22 Nov 92    13:00  NBC     Denver Broncos          Los Angeles, CA
Sun 29 Nov 92    17:00  ESPN    San Diego Chargers      San Diego, CA
Sun  6 Dec 92    13:00  NBC     Kansas City Chiefs      Los Angeles, CA
Mon 14 Dec 92    18:00  ABC     Miami Dolphins          Miami, FL
Sun 20 Dec 92    13:00  NBC     San Diego Chargers      Los Angeles, CA
Sat 26 Dec 92    13:00  NBC     Washington Redskins     Washington, DC


       Looks like a pretty tough schedule, this plus the fact that they'll
    probably be starting Marinovich equals a 9-7 or 8-8 season, to me. I
    expect Marinovich will have some days where he looks like a rookie, and
    others where he'll be impressive. The running game should be in good to
    great condition with the addition of Dickerson. The defense will also
    be good to great, with just the right balance of vets (Howie, Golic,
    Townsend etc..) and youth (Davis, Smith, Harrison, and now McGlockton).
    The secondary is in great shape, and the LB's may get some needed help
    with the additions of Aundray Bruce, and Anthony Bell. (?) I'm looking
    forward to seeing Okoye meet his match when he runs into McGlockton. 
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.551QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareThu May 21 1992 19:073
    Cake Schedule...  Except for the Donks that is.   ~/~
    
    BG
40.552:^)BSS::JCOTANCHThu May 21 1992 20:383
    Geez, Carlos, I was expectin' your prediction to be 16-0.
                                                       
    Joe
40.553It can happen!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu May 21 1992 21:436
    Well they could go 16-0....Joe (hey that rhymes), I was talkin worst
    case in my previous scenario. Wait 'til I put in the best case, that
    oughtta make you guy's sik !
    
    Carlos
    
40.554QUASER::JACKSONTAPlayoff boundFri May 22 1992 06:149
      Carlos talks a good game,  but he's not a certain Browns fan :-)
    
      The AFC west may end up more "equal" this year when it comes to
    W/L records.  The Chargers are on the verge.  Look for Seattle to be in
    the Cellar,  while the donks, chiefs and faids lead the pack with SD
    hangin' tough.   Of course this is based on talent, coaching and
    schedule!
    
    	Tj
40.555EARRTH::BROOKSI am the margin of error.Fri May 22 1992 15:341
    How many assisstant coaches does Denver have ?
40.556BSS::JCOTANCHFri May 22 1992 15:371
    Not as many as Cleveland.
40.557M&MELMAGO::CGRIEGOSat May 30 1992 13:5112
    Earlier this week, former Raider great LB Matt Millen announced his
    retirement from the Redskins. Millen spent most of his career with the
    silver and black, plus a year or two (?) with the niners, and then he
    finished off his career with the defending superbowl champs. Wherever
    he played, success followed him, and I'm sure he'll be in the HoF
    someday. I think Millen has two superbowl rings from his days with the
    Raiders, one with the Redskins, and I think maybe one with the Niners
    (?)....not too many can say that.
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.558Millen= good career but HoF??CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Mon Jun 01 1992 13:529
    Carlos,
    What criteria are you using to believe that Millen should be in the
    HoF?  He was over the hill basically with the Niners and Redskins, 
    and was utilized in specialty situations. He had some good years with
    the Raiders, maybe two great ones, but I don't consider him "great" or
    HoF material. He was good and productive, yes, but HoF? Not in my mind.
    
    MikeL
    
40.559QUASER::JACKSONTAAdvanced past 1st round of 'offs!Mon Jun 01 1992 13:534
      Millen was one of those raiders you just love to hate (figuratively
    (sp?) speaking).
    
      Tim
40.560ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jun 01 1992 14:018
    Mike,
    I could just as easily ask what criteria your using to exclude Millen
    from the HoF, but basically it's just our own humble opinions. You
    believe he's not HoF material, I believe he is.
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.561Ooooookay, fine! 8^)CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Mon Jun 01 1992 14:101
    
40.562QUASER::JACKSONTAAdvanced past 1st round of 'offs!Mon Jun 01 1992 14:301
      He's HoF if Uncle Al says so.
40.563CNTROL::CHILDS&quot;I'll get briefed up on that&quot; hahahaaaMon Jun 01 1992 14:588
 I think the fact that Millen was able to make Joe Paterno pick up his whole
 team and move them to another field because Matt refused his order to get off
 the one they were playing on at the time, would qualify him as HOf material...

 ;^)

 
40.564ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jul 13 1992 15:555
    
    The Raiders began training camp yesterday....it's almost football
    season again! :-)
    
    Carlos
40.565ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jul 21 1992 20:5311
    The Raiders signed Terence Flagler RB, and cut Michael Attardi K, last
    Friday(?). Seems to me I've heard of Flagler before, didn't he play for
    the 49'ers, and wasn't he half way decent for them??? Irregardless, I'm
    still wondering why they'd be interested in adding yet another running
    back. Isn't Marcus, Dickerson, Bell, Smith, McCallum, Mueller, etc...
    enough? I think they'd be better off going after some more LB's or
    OL's. 
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.566USCTR1::NAHEARNWed Jul 22 1992 14:046
    Maybe Al figures to turn him into a TE???
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
40.567SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Jul 22 1992 16:236
    
    Flagler was last with the Cards, and didn't get much action here, the
    last two years.  Can't figure why the Raiders would want him, unless
    they really like 49er reject rb's.
    
    Brews
40.568ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 22 1992 19:5025
    Nelly,
    
    I don't really think they'll be trying to make a TE out of him, cause
    they've already got two high quality TE's in Ethan Horton, and Andrew
    Glover. Horton of course, made the Pro-Bowl last year, and Glover, in
    his rookie season, showed a lot of promise should Horton go down.
    You're probably right though, in that they'll most likely be converting
    him to another position...maybe special teams I'm thinking.
    
    Speaking of special teams, lasted year the faids had one of the best if
    not THE best special teams unit in the league. Three of the Raiders
    eight pro-bowlers (T.Brown,J.Gossett, and J.Jaeger) made the trip to
    Hawaii, and another, (Elvis "Toast-no-mo" Patterson) should also have
    went. This unit should be even better this year, with the re-additions
    of R.Brown and S.Adams, two former Raiders that excelled in ST's.
    
    Also, caught a glimpse of the Raiders beating up on the 'pokes down in
    Tejas, this morning on ESPN's Sports Center. Steve Wisniewski was
    giving Russell Maryland some pointers on proper football etiquette, and
    Russ didn't take to kindly to it so the Wiz had to slap him  around      
    a little bit. You could also see Eric D. taking a snap in the short
    clip they showed, looks like he still has a good little burst in those
    engines, and he threw in a nice little cut move just for kicks.
    
    Carlos
40.569Signings???SALEM::HARRIS_KWed Jul 29 1992 09:284
    Is there any news on Terry McDaniel or Lionel Washington Signing?
    HOw about Marcus Allen??
    
    Kenn
40.570'bout time...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Jul 31 1992 20:214
    Tommorrow, during the Jets -vs- Eagles game, in Canton Ohio, Uncle Al
    will be enshrined in the Hall of Fame. 
    
    Carlos
40.571QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Fri Jul 31 1992 22:001
      I hope he doesn't break down and cry!
40.572punches were flyingDESERT::HEISERNephilim hunterFri Jul 31 1992 23:393
    Only 12 fights between the Raiders and Cards in Flagstaff yesterday.
    
    Mike
40.573who got the best of it?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 03 1992 15:246
    Re. -1  Ahhh, that's the kind of Raider reports I like to hear.
    
    Any reports on how McGlockton or Skrepenak are doing so far??
    
    Carlos
    
40.574They even start fights with themselvesBSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 03 1992 15:515
    Heard where Elvis Patterson and assistant coach Jack Stanton got into a
    real skirmish on Friday.  It started with a shouting match and ended
    with Patterson wrestling Stanton to the ground.
    
    Joe
40.575Marinovich and Schroeder Hug......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Tue Aug 04 1992 10:267
    
    
                  Yes!!!! Raider Ball at it's finest. All I want for
    Christmas is Simms or Young....
    
    
    Chappy.
40.576SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Aug 04 1992 16:026
>              Yes!!!! Raider Ball at it's finest. All I want for
>    Christmas is Simms or Young....
    
      According to today's Glob, the raidahs are so thrilled with Patterson
    thet they've suspended him and are tring to trade him.
                                     Denny
40.577ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 04 1992 16:468
    All he did was try to beat up on a coach, sheesh, that's no reason to
    get rid of the guy. Seriously though, trading him is not the answer,
    unless they feel that he's developed some kind of bad attitude or
    something, that might spread. 'Toast' had an all-pro year last year
    even if he wasn't selected to the Pro-bowl, and IMHO, they oughta try
    and work this out wif him. 
    
    Carlos
40.578ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 04 1992 20:2619
    Have
    
       the
    
       Raiders
    
       ever
    
       won
    
       an
    
       NFL
    
       championship?
    
    
       
40.579de ja vou...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 04 1992 20:469
    
    Why yes! How considerate of you to ask. As a MoF, in the last 11 years
    a grand total of 4 NFL teams have claimed the Lombardi, of which the
    Raiders claimed two, and were also the only AFC team to do so in that
    span.
    
    HtH...Carlos
    
    
40.580RAIDER_FANS::ND_FANS::LIVING_IN_PASTBSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 04 1992 21:271
    
40.581Ya just turned me into a Raider fan for the yearCTHQ2::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Aug 05 1992 12:349
    Keep me outta this Cotanch!! 8^),
    As far as living in the past, wait till this year.
    And living in the past is what Maize and Blue followers do best.
    
    I do like Tim Brown tho.
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
40.582Raider's greatness is in the future...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Aug 05 1992 17:128
    >>             -< RAIDER_FANS::ND_FANS::LIVING_IN_PAST >-
    
    Hey Joe, at least Raiders fans can live in the past...while on the
    other hand, doink fans ain't got much of a past, or future, to live in.
    
    Besides, haven't you heard that history always repeats itself....
    
    Carlos
40.583QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Aug 05 1992 21:314
      re- history repeating,
    
    
      You mean Unckle Al is moving the team again?
40.584It's in Pasadena this year, isn't it?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Aug 05 1992 21:505
    >> You mean Unckle Al is moving the team again?
    
    What..? ...and blow home field advantage for the Super Bowl...no way!
    
    Carloski
40.585CELTIK::JACOBSun-ripened for Mildness!Thu Aug 06 1992 01:4010
    
    >>What..? ...and blow home field advantage for the Super Bowl...no way!
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    I didn't know the Super Bowl was in Pile It High Stadium this year!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
40.586ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 06 1992 13:4422
    >>                          -< Signings??? >-
    
    >> Is there any news on Terry McDaniel or Lionel Washington Signing?
    >> HOw about Marcus Allen??
    
    >> Kenn
    
    I know it's been awhile, but I just found out yesterday. The Raiders
    have seven unsigned vets including: Marcus Allen, Terry McDaniel,
    and Lionel Washington. The other four are: Scott Davis, Greg Townsend,
    Tim Brown, and Winston Moss.
    
    In other Raider news, DE rookie Chester McGlokton impressed the coaches
    during a recent scrimmage. He was in against several veteran OL on the
    Raiders second string team, and was getting to the QB on almost every
    down. In case you need a yard stick: Raiders 2nd string = Donks 1st
    string....:-)  Also, it seems like Chester brought his big (older
    anyhow, he's only 6' 210lbs compared to 6'4" 325lbs) brother, Leon,
    along to try and get a spot on the roster as a safety.
    
    Carlos
    
40.587ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Aug 07 1992 13:347
    >> Is there any news on Terry McDaniel or Lionel Washington Signing?
    
    Well, scratch Washington off the list, he just signed a three year
    contract....now to get the other six into camp...
    
    Carloski
    
40.5880-1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 10 1992 15:5927
    Well, the Raiders lost their first pre-season game to the 49'ers. The
    final score was 24-10. The 49'ers were without Montana (who I think is
    history) and Young. 4th string QB, B. Musgrave came in and scored two
    4th quarter td's to put the game away for the 9'ers. The Raiders out
    gained the 49'ers through the air, 252yds, to 232yds, but were not as
    good on the ground....only 43 yds, in 16 attempts. Schroeder was
    4-9-1-76 (1 td), and Marinovich was 16-28-0-181. On the ground,
    Dickerson led the team with 6 carries for 22 yards, followed by Flagler
    who was 5-18. The #1 QB spot seems to be Schroeder's, but Marinovich
    will be given every opportunity to take it away. I think that by the
    time we get to the first game of the regular season, (against the
    doinks) it'll be Marinovich who will be in control. Although, if
    Schroeder manage to keep the job, I think he is more than capable. He
    had a good season in '90, but had a terrible one last year in large
    part because of a lack of a running game. With Bo gone, and Marcus
    Allen injured, the running game pretty much suffered, and so did the
    passing game. This year things should be a little different. Allen is
    healthy (tho he's not signed),  Nick Bell is healthy plus he's getting
    the benefit of another training camp to help cement in the system, and
    of course the addition of Dickerson, all these factors should help the
    Raiders have one of the best backfields in the NFL, and in turn help
    the passing game regain form.
    
    Next up, the Rams....
    
    Carloski
    
40.589Jmo.................WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MRAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!!Mon Aug 10 1992 17:046
    
    
    
                   Sorry Carlos but our boys aint goin nowhere with
    Schroeder as the QB. And I wasn't too impressed with Marinovich last
    year either.
40.590QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 10 1992 17:208
      Only gained 49 yards,  but you say one of the better backfields in
    the NFL.  Kind of a contradication there Carlos.8^)
    
      3 weeks and counting....
    
      0-1 will be the faids record after week 1!!
    
    	Tim
40.591No contradictions here, just the facks!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 10 1992 18:5128
    >>                 Al Bundies feet=Ford Con.
    
    Tim, what the heck? ...I don't get it.
    
    >>  Only gained 49 yards,  but you say one of the better backfields in
    >>  the NFL.  Kind of a contradication there Carlos.8^)
    
    C'mon man....it's the first game of pre-season. Besides, if your
    interested in evaluating your teams passing game...then you pass it
    alot. Likewise, if your interested in evaluating your teams running
    game...then you run it alot. Dickerson only got the ball six times,
    while Nick Bell got it even less (3 times), and Marcus didn't even
    play. So it seems like they were just giving the boys a work out, and
    not really putting 'em to the test. I think the Raiders are certainly
    in the top ten backfields. Others I might include are: Chiefs,
    Chargers, Giants, Browns, Cowboys, Bills, Lions, Bears, Dolphins.
    The thing about the Raiders, Browns, Chiefs, Chargers, and Giants is
    that they have depth too. While teams like Detroit, Bills, Cowboys and
    such have an ace RB, but if he should go down there's no one to take up
    the slack. Then on the other hand, there's teams like the donks who
    burn their ace (Humphrey), and draw a deuce (Smith)...:-)
    
    Raiders = S.B. Champs
    Donks = ....oh well, at least they'll have an easy schedule in '93.
    
    Carloski
    
    
40.592Can the Raiders ???CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYMon Aug 10 1992 19:196
    
    Carolski, do you really believe "scared" Jay can take the Raiders,
    to the Big One and Win??? If so explain.
    
    
    Drewski
40.593Give Marrinovich time + Betty Ford clinicQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 10 1992 19:5714
      My P_name is what I think of Ford Consumer, they stink!  At least
    according to Peg, Al's feet smell.
    
      I agree that the faids SHOULD have one of the best backfields,  but
    need to prove it. 49 yrds is squat.  
    
      Your right about the Humphrey deal-(   The Broncos need to find a
    running game again.  What is Raymond Berry drawing up,  or is he?
    
    
      And yes it is only the 1st pre-game,  but it won't stop me from
    having fun^)
    
       Tim
40.594SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Aug 10 1992 20:092
    
    What is the Ford Consumer??  
40.595QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 10 1992 20:168
      Mortgage is the one I'm talking about.
    
      The other type of Frod Consumer might be that transformer thats
    munches cars at the monster truck events....
    
      HTH,
    
    	Tim
40.596That's a definite maybe!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 10 1992 20:3623
    
    >> Carolski, do you really believe "scared" Jay can take the Raiders,
    >> to the Big One and Win??? If so explain.
    
    Welp Drewp, it's like this see. Two years ago wrong way Jay took the
    Raiders to within one game of the Super Bowl, and even though they got
    embarrassed by Buffalo, it wasn't all 'scared Jay's' fault. The defense
    didn't have a clue, Bo was injured the game before against the Bengals,
    and 'scared Jay' and co. also had a bad day. So, to answer your
    questions, yes I think he can get them there, and yes, if the rest of
    the team (running game, receivers, defense, special teams etc...)
    do there part, I believe Jay can do his part to win it. The problem
    with Schroeder (as you mentioned : 'scared Jay') is that when the
    pressure is on (like, for instance, lack of running game which tells
    the other team that you basically have to pass) Jay chokes, or gets         
    'scared'. But, when you have the balance between the running and
    passing game, Schroeder is very effective....witness his '90 season,
    and his years with Washington. 
    
    Carloski
    
    
    
40.597AFC WEST TEAMS NEED MORE " O "CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYMon Aug 10 1992 21:1911
    I have to give to it you carloski, you seem to be a realist about your
    QB situation, But I still Think when comes to winning the big one the
    QB will be the focus and regardless of how good or bad the team is 
    playing he's the one player that can cause total defeat of the team.
    
    This should be the year of parity in the AFC West. A lot of changes at 
    QB and the suprise team might be KC if Offense Shows up. That seems to
    be a common Problem with all The AFC West Team. 
    (ps. Sorry for miss printing your Name Carloski).
    
    Drewski
40.598Re. Schroeder & the bowlELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 10 1992 21:485
    Drewski, it's all irrelevent anyhow, seeing as how Marinovich will be
    the one getting 'em to the bowl. :*}
    
    Carlos
    
40.599CAN YOU SAY TOUCHDOWN!CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYMon Aug 10 1992 22:016
    
    Can anyone address the Problem(s) with the AFC West Teams that seem
    to be unable to produce points like say the 9'ers, skins,bills, oilers
    when there on target.  
    
    Drewski
40.600BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 10 1992 22:051
    Drewski returns from over a year of RONing...film at 10.
40.601ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 13 1992 14:468
    Marcus Allen, and Terry McDaniel, have both signed new contracts
    leaving four unsigned vets. Also, Elvis Patterson has been re-instated
    after body slamming a coach that gave him a direct order which refused
    to do. Where do they get this sort of rebelious attitude from
    anyhow....?
    
    car-low-s
    
40.602exQUASER::HUNTERA Horse Is A Horse Of Course Of CourseThu Aug 13 1992 18:137
    
    
     Good,  I mean about Patterson...  I makes me feel good to have the
    him on the Faiders team.  Always a garranteed toast with Elvis out
    there.
    
    BG
40.603Raiders undefeated after week #1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 13 1992 19:3511
    Big-Shame.....is that you....I didn't think you'd show this year seeing
    as how the donks have the cellar on reserves....Oh well, at least I
    won't have to listen to your ramblings much longer, I figure this topic
    oughtta be alot quieter after the Raiders shame the donks in week #1.
    
    About Elvis, he ain't 'toast' no more, now he goes by 'The King'(of
    special teams, that is).
    
    Carlitos 
    
    
40.604Tim Brown signsTIGEMS::MCNEILFri Aug 14 1992 13:146
	I heard that Tim Brown signed and is in Camp today.


	Dave    
    

40.605ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Aug 14 1992 13:476
    You beat me to it Dave, yup T Brown signed and the offense is complete,
    now they're just missing three key defensive players: G Townsend, 
    S Davis, and W Moss.
    
    Carlitos
    
40.606Donks still = 0-1 after week #1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 17 1992 18:4633
    1) The Raiders are now 0-2.
    
    2) The Raiders will be winning to the big game, much to everybodies
       surprise, but my own! :-)
    
    3) If your a Raider fan, expect a different look from them on offense,
       than what you've seen the last couple of years. As can be seen by 
       what they've been doing so far in pre-season, they will be airing 
       the ball out much more this year. 
    
    4) The defense has yet to impress, although they are missing some very
       key performers.
    
    5) Dickerson has also yet to impress. He carried the ball five times
       this weekend (against his former, former team) for a grand total
       of one yard, that averages to about 2.5" per carry, I should also
       mention that Eric was able to double his yardage on one reception.
    
    6) The emphasis definitely seems to be on the aerial assault though, 
       as I mentioned before. They gained 299 yards, completing 23-47-1 
       by air, compared to 12 yards in 14 trys on the ground.
    
    7) The final score against the Rams resulted in a 19-16 O.T. loss for 
       the Raiders. The Rams averaged about 4.7 yards per rush against the
       Raiders, and gained 170 yards on the ground, and 240 by air.
       Once Greg Townsend, Scott Davis, and Winston Moss sign though, we 
       should see a significant improvement on defense.
    
    8) Did I already mention that the Raiders were going to be this years
       SuperBowl Champs...?
    
    Carlos
    
40.607QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 17 1992 19:217
      14 runs for 12 yards!  I thought the faids were going to be great at
    running the ball?  Granted 14 tries isn't alot, but 12 yards?  Thats
    simply outstanding!;^)
    
       SB champs?
    
    	Tim
40.608nuthin to worry about yet!!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 17 1992 21:3323
    >> 14 runs for 12 yards!  I thought the faids were going to be great at
    >> running the ball?  Granted 14 tries isn't alot, but 12 yards?  
    
    I know what'cha mean Tim, that's not the kind of yardage I'd expect to
    see even if they only did try it 14 times. Either the Rams run defense
    is great or the Raiders running game needs help...and it's probably the
    latter. Although, Marcus Allen still hasn't played one down. I don't
    know what Nick Bell, or Eric Dickerson's problems are? Like I said
    before Dickerson averaged a very, very weak two and a half inches per
    carry, and Nick Bell was averaging less than two yards per carry. I
    think it's still to early to push the panick button though, seeing as
    how it's only the second game of pre-season, and they haven't really
    even tried to establish a running attack in either game. I think these
    next two pre-season games will be a much better indicator of how the
    team (and all the other teams for that matter) is/are going to do.  The
    first couple of weeks are spent on evaluating new talent, and maybe
    trying out some new things, but the last two (especially the last one)
    the coaches have a little better idea of who they'll be keeping and
    stuff like that. I think this week sometime all teams have to cut their
    rosters down to 60, and then again next week down to the final cut
    (I think 44) ? Does this sound right to anybody else?
    
    Carloski
40.609TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Aug 17 1992 21:385
    
    Bad news for ya....last year, the Rams run D was pathetic.  
    
    Brews
    
40.610ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Aug 19 1992 15:3313
40.611PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 19 1992 15:404
40.612Good one, MacSHALOT::HUNTSing Do Wah DiddyWed Aug 19 1992 16:005
40.613ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Aug 19 1992 17:239
    >> Yeah, like who's going to get creditted with the fumble recovery.
    
    >>                         -< Good one, Mac >-
    
    Yeah, that was a pretty good one, although I don't think Uncle Al would
    appreciate it. :-)
    
    Curly Toes
    
40.614TS if he appreciates it or not, it was hilariousBSS::JCOTANCHWed Aug 19 1992 18:364
>    although I don't think Uncle Al would
>    appreciate it. :-)
    
And who really cares what Uncle Al thinks.    
40.615ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Aug 19 1992 19:1211
    >> And who really cares what Uncle Al thinks.
    
    Ok now, Joe, this is starting to get outta line. You can talk about my
    wife and kids, but once you start bad mouthing 'HoF Al', I'm afraid
    that's where I'm going to have to draw the line! Now I don't really
    want to have to do it, but one more outburst like this and I'm gonna
    have to turn you in to the moderators, got it! 
    
    Curly Toes
    
    P.S. Many :-)
40.616ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Aug 21 1992 15:3812
    Seems like future SuperBowl champion, Todd Marinovich, missed a couple
    of practice's earlier this week due to soreness in his shoulder, but he
    should be ok by now, and he also should see some playing time tommorrow
    against the 'Skins. Wonder if it will be telervized nationally?
    
    Also, still no good news about the three unsigned defensive vets, which
    means they'll probably be able to maintain their perfect record........
    ...0-3....:-)
    
    
    Carlos 
    
40.617Lookin good!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 24 1992 14:2018
40.618Waived....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 25 1992 14:137
    So far, the Raiders have waived: Terrance Flagler, & Vance Mueller
    RB's, Niko Noga, & Matt Gee LB's, Tom Roth OL, John Diggs & Leon
    McGlokton (Chesters bro) DB's, and Scott Woods QB. The only one that
    really surprises me is Niko Noga, somehow I figured that he'd make the
    team....
    
    Carlos
40.619ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Aug 26 1992 15:5235
    Others waived:
    
    Alberto White, LB
    Mike Alexander & Stacey Simmons, WR's
    Malcolm Showell, DL
    
    Placed on the reserve-did not report list:
    
    Greg Townsend & Scott Davis, DL     Ouch! Does this mean that they
                                        won't be able to play for a certain
                                        amount of time even if they do
                                        reach an agreement????
    
    Placed on IR:
    
    James Fitzpatrick & Tony Rowell, OL
    Brent Fullwood, RB
    Walter Watts, DL
    
    Placed on reserve-non-football injury list:
    
    Dennis Johnson, DB
    
    Also, former Raider DL, Mike Wise, committed suicide last week. Wise
    left the Raiders last year and went to the Browns (not sure if it was
    through Plan 'B' or a trade?) where he was cut. :-(
    
    11 year vet Howie Long has nothing but praise for first round draft
    pick Chester McGlokton. "This guy is gonna be a stud" Howie says, and
    the last person Howie said would be a stud was Bo Jackson, so I guess
    he wonk's what he's talking about.
    
    Carlitos G. Griegowitz III
    
    
40.620This year belongs to the Raiders!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 27 1992 14:468
    Winston Moss signed a contract......so we're just down to two, Scott
    Davis, and Greg Townsend. If they don't sign, I'd expect Anthony Smith
    to move into one of their position's, and possibly Nolan Harrison, or
    Chester McGlokton in at the other position. We won't lose a step with
    Anthony Smith in there, but I'm not too sure about the other two guys.
    
    Carlos
    
40.621ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Aug 28 1992 15:2111
    The Raiders signed WR, Stacey Simmons, after waiving him earlier this
    week...?
    
    Also, during the last couple of years the Raiders have had a difficult
    time containing Houston's run-and-shoot, and it'll probably continue
    this weekend, so the Raiders will probably lose their last pre-season
    game and be 0-4.......I wonder if they've ever gone without a win in
    the pre-season????
    
    Carlos
    
40.622CSC32::SALZERFri Aug 28 1992 18:556
    Don't quote me on this Carlos, but I think the last time 
    they went winless in pre-season they won the bowl against the
    Skins. 1981 or 82? John H would know that. Where's he been 
    anyway?  
    
    BoB
40.623FSHQA2::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Aug 28 1992 19:277
    I've been around.  I don't have preseason records handy for each team
    so I won't be able to help.  Sorry.
    
    The Raiders won the 1984 Super Bowl against the Skins so they'd have
    had to have gone winless in the 1983 preseason.
    
    John
40.624ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Aug 28 1992 20:466
    There you have it! According to BoB, the Raiders are going all the way
    this year.....:-)    ....if they lose tommorrow that is. Still time for
    JoJ to jump on the bandwagon. (is he still around, it's hard to keep
    track nowadays?)
    
    Carlos
40.625ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 31 1992 19:137
    Well I didn't really think the Raiders were gonna beat the Oilers this
    weekend, but they did. No biggy though, being pre-season and all.
    Still Marinovich played well, as did Schroeder who will more than
    likely remain the #1 QB. Nick Bell also played very good. Next week
    it's for real, and the Raiders are gonna bust some bronc's.
    
    Carlitos
40.626QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Aug 31 1992 21:508
      Jay is the starter according to Shell.
    
      With Jay in and Atwater out,  that is 1-2 less int's that Jay would
    have thrown!
    
      It looks like the faids found a running game the last 2 weeks FWIW
    
    	Tim
40.627Raiders over donks by +10ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 01 1992 13:5020
    The Raiders waived:
    
    Vince Evans & Anthony Dilweg, QB's  (guess they're only gonna go with
                                         two QB's....?)
    
    Tom Benson, LB  (expect Aaron Wallace to replace him)
    
    Ron Brown, Daryl Hobbs, & Tyrone Montgomery, WR's
    
    Napoleon McCallum & Kevin Smith, FB's
    
    Rory Graves, Joel Patten, Josh Taotoai, & Rich Stephens, OL
    
    Doug Reed, Ferric Collons, & A.J. Jimmerson, DL
    
    Curtis Cotton & Robert McWright, DB's
    
    
    Carlos
    
40.628ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Sep 02 1992 15:2220
    Well, Sunday's the big day. The Raiders open up their season with two
    road games, (against the beloved donks, and then against the bengals)
    before going home to face the browns. If pre-season is any indicator,
    then their offense is doing pretty good, the passing game has been
    averaging about 250 yards/game, and the running game really took off
    for the lasted two pre-season games. They gained more than 130 yards in
    each of the last two games. I expect they'll do well against the doinks
    on offense if shredder can keep the inty's down; the absence of Atwater
    should make things nicer for the Raiders both on passing and receiving.
    On defense however, the absence's of Greg Townsend and Scott Davis
    should at least return the favor for Bucky and the donks. Again, if
    pre-season is any indicator, than the donks are in trouble. Neither the
    passing or running has been very impressive, and the injuries are
    starting to add up. The outlook for this game has yet another 'W' for
    the Raiders written all over it, although I'm sure the doinks will
    make it interesting. Should be one of the better games this weekend.
    Expect Eric Dickerson & Nick Bell to steal the show.
    
    Carlitowitz
    
40.629BLITZ Jay please ?OURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Wed Sep 02 1992 17:3310
The hope and dreams of a Donk season are this Sunday night. 

Seems that this team is still in Berlin looking for Karl Mecklenburg's 
relatives. 


Without Scott Davis and Greg Townsend Denver stands a chance if they run the 
ball up the gut all day long and don't even think of a John Elway pass play. 


40.630ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Sep 02 1992 20:4516
    >>    "T Maddox, J Namath, J Elway..." 
    
    Don't tell me they got the kid wearing pantyhose already!
    
    >> Without Scott Davis and Greg Townsend Denver stands a chance
    >> if they run the ball ........
    
    I wouldn't be to sure about that, Anthony Smith will probably be
    filling in for either Davis or Townsend, and I expect Nolan Harrison
    will probably share some time with McGlokton at the other spot. Smith
    was a #1 draft pick two years ago, but spent his first year on IR, so
    lasted year was pretty much his rookie season and he came in only
    behind Townsend in the sacks department with 10.5 and he wasn't even a
    starter. Scott Davis' long arms will be missed though.
    
    Carlos
40.631Not Worth a titleQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Sep 02 1992 21:1915
    got tickets to the game...  Look for me on TV...  I'll be the one
    Totally Blasted on Coors because;
    
    	a) The Donks are kicking the ^%&&^* out of the faiders
    
    	or...
    
    	b) The Donks are getting the ^&*%^& kicked out of them by the Faiders
    
    
     	 Either way i'll be havin a great time..   I have low expectations
    	for the Donks this year...  Dan Reeves is a worthless Tom landry
    	look-a-like bozo.
    
    BG
40.632PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineWed Sep 02 1992 21:2211
    
    >>Totally Blasted on Coors because;
    
    You drinking that over-rated Rocky Mountain Moose pi$$, eh????
    
    Why not switch to some REAL beer??
    
    Inquiring minds and all that
    
    JaKe
    
40.633and its RMTPW!QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesWed Sep 02 1992 22:138
      RE-real beer...
    
    
      You mean imported beer?
    
      UYIM!
    
    	Tim
40.634PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineWed Sep 02 1992 23:0519
    
    >>  RE-real beer...
    
    
    >>  You mean imported beer?
    
    Nah, not imported, just get some Penn Pilsner, brewed here in
    Pittsburgh at a micro-brewery, and sit back and enjoy.  One of the best
    beers around, IMHO.
    
    >>                          -< and its RMTPW! >-

    
    >>  UYIM!
    
    OK, what do these stand for?????
    
    JaKe
    
40.635Micro-brews red beers are good IMOQUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesThu Sep 03 1992 17:1110
        UYIM =  Better not say this one in this "public" forum.
    
      RMTPW = Rocky Mtn pi$$ water = Coors,  which I normally don't drink
    unless its free.  Coors winterfest beer is good, but @$6.25 a 6pack, I
    don't drink it to often.  For those prices,  I will drink Hieneken
    (sp?)...
    
    	HTH
    
    	Tim
40.636ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 03 1992 21:009
    ........meanwhile back at the ranch, looks like McGlokton is gonna miss
    the first game because of a foot injury. And with Townsend and Davis
    still unsigned, the only guy left is Nolan Harrison. If any of the
    defensive linemen get hurt the faids are in trouble. The improvements
    at linebacker should help this situation out. 
    
    Raiders by +10
    
    Carlos
40.637QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesThu Sep 03 1992 21:011
      by 10?   You know these games are usually decided by <7 points....
40.638BSS::JCOTANCHThu Sep 03 1992 22:194
    Tim, you should know better than to try and reason with Carlos.
    
    :^)
    Joe
40.639SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Sep 04 1992 11:503
       Whatever happened to the Townsend to Houston for Sean Jones rumor?
    Nothing I take it?
                                        Denny
40.640ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 04 1992 13:1627
    >> Whatever happened to the Townsend to Houston for Sean Jones rumor?
    
    I remember hearing that on ESPN a couple of nights ago, but I think 
    last night ESPN reported that Jones had been traded to somebody else ?
    
    Here's an interesting little article that's reprinted W/O permission:
    
    Finally Al Davis is in the HoF and former top draft pick Aundray Bruce
    is where he wants to be. "Just having an opportunity to play on a team
    that is traditionally excellent. Going to the Falcons was not the best place
    that I could have gone. I am just happy that I've got the opportunity
    to play for who I wanted to play for when I came out of college. It's
    like a dream come true, because when I was at Atlanta things were down,
    I didn't perform and I didn't want to be there, and now that the tables
    have turned, I feel like a new person," said Bruce. Bruce has been
    everything the Raiders expected and more. He is a tremendous pass
    rusher and also has the speed to be a demon on special teams as well.
    Against the Redskins, Bruce saved a touchdown by tackling the Redskins
    kick-off returner from behind. Says Bruce, "I can't wait for our
    opener. Denver is in a lot of trouble."
    
    
    I love that last line. 
    
    Carlos   
    
    P.S. For the sake of not being unreasonable, Raiders by +9.5
40.641Did I say +9.5? Make it +9.75...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 04 1992 13:3619
    Here's the way I believe the Raiders will line up against the donks:
    
    	Donk Offense          				Raider Defense
    _____________________________________________________________________
                                     |
                  Derek Russell  WR  |  RCB Lionel Washington
                  Jeff Davidson  LT  |      RLB Anthony Bell
    G.Green  RB    Sean Farrell  LG  |  RE  Aundray Bruce
    Bucky    QB     Keith Kartz   C  |  RT  Anthony Smith  FS E. Anderson
    Perryman RB     Doug Widell  RG  |      MLB Riki Ellison
                     Ken Lanier  RT  |  LT  Bob Golic      SS R. Lott
                   Clarence Kay  TE  |  LE  Howie Long
                                     |      LLB Aaron Wallace
                   Mark Jackson  WR  |  LCB Terry McDaniel
    
    
    HtH, Carlos (if I get a chance later, I'll put in the Raider 'O', &
                 donk 'D'.)
    
40.642QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesFri Sep 04 1992 14:285
      Sean Farrell is out, Davidson is at LG and Freeman at LT.  I'm not
    sure if Kartz is back yet?  If so,  maybe the other Widell will start
    at LG instead of Davidson.
    
      Tim
40.643GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Fri Sep 04 1992 18:144
    
    	Nope.  One of the Widell brothers will start for Kartz.
    
    Claybone
40.644ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 04 1992 18:5423
    Re -1, proberly Dave. Here's the other side of the lineup, and it might
    be a little off too.:
    
       Raider Offense                                   Donkey Defense
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      |
                     Willie Gault WR  |  RCB Wymon Henderson
                                      |
                  Bruce Wilkerson LT  |    ROLB Simon Fletcher
    S. Smith  FB Steve Wisniewski LG  |  RE Kenny Walker  SS Dennis Smith
    Shredder  QB      Don Mosebar  C  |    RILB Karl Mecklenburg
    Eric D.   RB      Max Montoya RG  |  NT Greg Kragen
                     Steve Wright RT  |    LILB Michael Brooks
                     Ethan Horton TE  |  LE Brian Sochia  FS A. Montgomery
                                      |    LOLB Mike Croel
                 Mervyn Fernandez WR  |  LCB Tyrone Braxton
    
    
    I'm not to sure, but I think Kragen might be out, and I don't know
    who'd replace him if he is.
    
    Carlos
    
40.645Put Marinovich in!TIGEMS::MCNEILTue Sep 08 1992 13:0715
	Great game on Sunday night...Donks win 17-13.  I couldn't believe
	that the Raiders D couldn't hold them on that final drive, and
	then Schroeder fumbles as the silver and black tries to 
	come back...

	I think Marinovich will be starting this weekend.  I also think
	that the Raiders need to get Tim Brown the ball more.  Gault
	is always double teamed and Schroeder still tries to throw it
	too him, while Brown has man coverage and it open quite often.

	I think Dickerson will be a big asset for the Raiders this year!

	Dave    

40.646GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Tue Sep 08 1992 13:327
    
    
    	I think they oughta cut Eric loose.  Maybe it's just me but
    	it seems like he fumbles at least once per game.  The Raiders
    	would be better off going with Nick Bell IMHO.
    
    Claybone
40.647One mini-platter of crow please.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 08 1992 15:0120
    Well, here it is the first workday after the season opener and I'm
    already munching down on black-bird pie! I agree with .645, it's time
    for Marinovich. I think the last comment by one of the TNT commentators
    hit the nail on the head, it went something like "The difference
    between these two teams is that one of them has a QB that can come from
    behind when the pressure is on." . I guess that basically, I'm finally
    convinced about what you guys have been trying to tell me all along-
    Shredder sips! The offensive co-ordinator (Terry Robiskie) needs to go
    too. Give me a break, I mean, even the donks with their limited mental
    capacities, are gonna eventually figure out (with Robiskie's game plan)
    that if the faids are in the I formation, that they're gonna give it to
    Dickerson 9 times outta ten. How about a little play-action in there to
    keep them guessing? Even still, the good news is that the running game
    looks solid, as does the defense which played without three of there
    leading defensive linemen (by the way, Townsend signed and should be
    playing hopefully next weekend against the bengals). The Donks looked
    weak (especially in the 1st half) excepting those last few minutes,
    when it counted. Congrats!
    
    Crowlos
40.648QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 14 1992 22:561
      Is it vacation time for Carlos?
40.649CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinTue Sep 15 1992 12:467
As some of my English friends would say (regarding the Raiders defeat)


	Un-LUCK-y....


'Saw
40.650THERE FAIDING AWAYAYOV14::ATHOMSONTue Sep 15 1992 13:434
    No wrong as Scotlands number 1 MIGHTY BENGALS fan would say tough S--T
    
    TIGERS TAME THE FAIDERS
        HA HA HA
40.651CarlosWatch, Day 2...BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Tue Sep 15 1992 19:151
    
40.652If only it wasn't for the final score we'd be 2-0!TULA::CGRIEGOTue Sep 15 1992 20:5530
    >> TIGERS TAME THE FAIDERS
    
    Right....What do you Scotish guys know 'bout football anyhow? :-)
    (By the way, do you know Donald Johnstone, or Derrick something or
     other, if so tell them Carlos says 'ello')
    
    0-2! 0-2! Why, the faids haven't been 0-2 since before I was born.
        (well...right around that time anyhow, it's been 28 years since
     they started out at 0-2) The worst part about the Bengal loss is that
    it wasn't even Shredders fault this time. He actually had a good day,
    passing for almost 400 yards, 2tds, and only 1 inty. The running game
    did alright, they averaged ~4.5 yards/carry, even though they didn't use
    it as much as they should have. Looks like the defense had a rough time
    stopping the rush though? I understand that the faids had the momentum,
    they came back and tied it up at 21 forcing the game into overtime,
    then they won the toss, only to have the kick returner, Dan Land, cough
    it up in Bengal field goal range, and basically give the game away.
    Another tough heart breaking loss, if they keep this up they'll be the
    best bunch of losers out there. Still, there's lots of hope left.
    There's still 14 games left, and they could have very very easily have
    been 2-0 right now....
    
    Hopefully they'll be able to get by Cleaveland and boost their morale a
    little, 'cause after that, they've got three tough games coming up. One
    against the Chiefs in KC on Monday night, and then two at home against
    the Giants and Bills.
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.653GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Tue Sep 15 1992 21:274
    
    	The Raiders..........the best 0-2 team in da league! :*)
    
    Claybone
40.654Baby SnakeROYALT::FORGETLA Raiders #1Wed Sep 16 1992 11:267
    
    
     Well Listen up Raider's Fans.  Young Todd will start against the
    Browns.  I for one is very happy.  
    
    
    Mike 
40.655Come on Al, give him a few more chances...BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Wed Sep 16 1992 15:004
    Damm!  I was hoping the Faiders wouldn't wake up and smell the coffee
    and keep playing Schroeder awhile longer.
    
    Joe
40.656Browns will be charmed by the Snake_not!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Sep 16 1992 15:4321
    Hey Mike, that's great news, I think it shoulda happened half way
    thru the donk game though, but better late than never. Expect mistakes
    from him as he'll be getting some valuable OJT, but don't expect his
    mistakes to be ala-Shredder (the worst possible mistakes at the worst
    possible time). Shredder changed his number from #13 to #10, but he's
    still unlucky. ESPN reperted that the Raiders (Uncle Al) are stepping
    up their efforts to trade Marcus Allen, after Allen confronted Davis
    after the donk game and said something to the effect of he's not gonna
    put his career on the line if Davis insists on keeping Shredder in
    there, and that Davis' Committment to Excellence is meaningless while
    Jay's in there. (very loose and probably not that accurate para-phrase
    by yours truly) Of course, these words struck right to the heart of Al
    Davis' very being, but now that I hear Marinovich is starting, I wonder
    if some of what Allen told Davis actually sunk in? In any case, I think
    the Raiders would be foolish to trade Allen, going down the stretch he
    could be their ace in the hole. Dickerson is 31 or 32 years old and not
    getting any younger, and Nick Bell spent half of last season injured. I
    say keep Allen and trade Shredder.
    
    Carlos
     
40.657HELP!!!!!!!SALEM::HARRIS_KWed Sep 16 1992 16:469
    Schroeder can't be blamed for the Bengals game. Like the end of last
    year, the D can't stop the run!!!! ,Chester, we need you!!!!! Howie
    just can't seem to make the plays. Ellison S@#KS!! Now that I've got
    that off my chest, I'm glad to see Marinovich get a chance. I would 
    also like to see Anthony Smith start in Howies spot. Anthony Bell 
    looked pretty good at LB also. They must start Tim Brown and get
    Fernandez out of there. This loss was a KILLER!!!
    
    Kenn
40.658Brown will startTIGEMS::MCNEILThu Sep 17 1992 13:138
	re: -.1 

	I saw on ESPN this morning that they will start Tim Brown
	over Fernandez this weekend.  I'm glad to see Tim finally
	playing like I always knew he could.

	Dave
40.659DickersonROULET::WHITEHAIRThu Sep 17 1992 14:124
    
    	How about some stats on Dickerson this year...  Has he been playing
    much this year?  Why hasn't he gotten any TD's yet?  Who is the Raiders
    goto man in the Red zone?
40.660Jay's outta thereBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredThu Sep 17 1992 14:337

	Heard on the radio this morning that Jay is being benched and will
	be replaced by Todd for this week's game against ???

	Kevin 
	      
40.661JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 17 1992 14:354
    >this week's game against ???
    
    Cleveland
                                
40.662In the commitment to winning I'd send Allen packing first...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 17 1992 14:478
    What was this business about Marcus Allen claiming that Al Davis is no
    longer committed to winning because he continued to start Jay
    Schroeder?  Talk about sticking a knife into a teammate's back.  I
    thought Allen had more class than that...
    
    glenn
    
40.663You coulda heard it here firstPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 17 1992 14:584
40.664SALEM::HARRIS_KThu Sep 17 1992 15:0812
    The Raiders don't seem to have a go to guy in the red zone. They go
    with whoever is hot. They have 2 rushing TD's this year, 1 by Nick Bell
    and the other by Marcus Allen. Dickerson carried the ball (I believe)
    22 times for 58 yds. against Denver and 6 for 10 yds. against Cinci..
    He had 1 fumble against Denver.
    
    I don't think that it is a coincidence that Tim Brown is starting the 
    same week they insert Marinovich into the lineup!! I like both moves
    except for the fact that they are 2 weeks late!! Now I would like to
    see them give Nick Bell the ball more often.
    
    Kenn
40.665Bench da Bum!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 17 1992 19:2219
    >> -< In the commitment to winning I'd send Allen packing first... >-
    
    No way! Whenever they've been in a bind and have called upon Allen,
    he's always come up big, but just the opposite is true of Shredder,
    matter o fack, probably every time they're in a bind it's because of
    Shredder. I'd guess that Allen's comments were made out of shear
    frustration, I mean, how many times can they (the Raiders) handle going
    out and totally dominating opposing teams (ala Denver), only to have
    their QB give it away? In the donk game the Raiders had about three or
    so drives where they were just marching down the field with almost no
    resistance, the only problem being that every time they'd get within
    striking distance of a TD, old Shredder would give the donks a present.
    The donks had ~19 yards of total offense in the first, compared to the
    Raiders who had something like 200 - 250 yards, but yet they only
    walked in to the lockers with a 3 point lead. And the worst part about
    it, is that we've seen this exact scenario over and over. 
    
    Carlos
    
40.666Art Shell is playing a very foolish gameOURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Thu Sep 17 1992 21:077
This week against Cleveland is a win for the Faids. With Jay or with Todd. 
There is no way that the Brown spots can stop the raider running game. I expect
Dickerson, and Bell to have 100 yrd games. This is going to get the Faider fans
in a serious state of pompitude about Todd the Great. 
Then in just a few weeks they will play Kansas City and Derrick Thomas will pull
a repeat performance on Todd aka wild card game last year. 
Then the Faider fans will be begging free agency to pick up a real man for QB. 
40.667DECWET::METZGERWhhhat eeze it, maan?Thu Sep 17 1992 21:1210
The Raiders should dump dickerson and retain Bell as their #1 back. I can't
believe he only got 2 carries last game. Dickerson can get your 3-4 yards a
carry but I could get that much with the line push he was getting..Bell
would consistantly outgain Dickerson if Shell would just give him the ball
more often...

Plus he fumbles less...

Metz
40.668AXIS::ROBICHAUDW I N D - It BlowsFri Sep 18 1992 11:371
    	What's the matter Metz, got Bell in a fantasy league?  8^)
40.669Todd's got a lot to learn yet...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadFri Sep 18 1992 13:431
'member, this is really Todd's rookie season.
40.670ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 18 1992 14:3621
    Bob, I agree, Todd does have lots to learn and both he and the Raiders
    coaching staff are well aware of this. In the press conference earlier
    this week, Shell and Marinovich both acknowledged that there would be
    mistakes made by Todd, but Shell told TM that he felt that TM would be
    making more positive things happen than negative ones. I think he'll do
    better against the Chiefs this time around. In his first game against
    the Chiefs lasted year, TM had a great day but unfortunately this was
    also around the time that the Raider 'D' was falling apart, and they
    couldn't stop the Chiefs. The second game (playoffs) TM didn't do as
    well, but I think because he has these two high pressure games under
    his belt, plus the benefit of another full training camp and extensive
    pre-season play, that he will be better equipped to lead this team. 
    Sure he's going to make mistakes, probably even cost a few games, but
    he'll also be making some great plays and winning even more.
    
    Carlos
    
    PS I also agree about giving Bell the ball more, I like the Dickerson
       trade, but so far he hasn't really produced, I think Marcus and Bell 
       would be the best combo back there right now.
    
40.671ROYALT::ASHEI think ya hear me knockin'Fri Sep 18 1992 17:261
    This is his 2nd year, I thought...
40.672DECWET::METZGERWhhhat eeze it, maan?Fri Sep 18 1992 17:4414
awww shuddup slasher...


Bell is the best back on the raiders but uncle Al is too worried about his 
image as the reclaimer of oter people mistakes to realize that so he is
making Shell give dickerson the ball instead....

Oh Yeah...and Bo Jackson got death threats during that playoff game :-)

Think the raiders might pick up Keith Millard who was just axed by the chicken 
hawks after giving up a 2nd and 3rd round pick for him? (Seahawks are idiots)

Metz
40.673CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadFri Sep 18 1992 17:547
re .651 (Walt)

It  is Todd's second yera in the league, but he skipped his (important) senior 
year in college.  My point was that Raiders fans should have realistic 
expectations, and that he should be expected to make rookie mistakes.

=Bob=
40.674Every team has a bright prospect and a bright future...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 18 1992 18:0412
                                                 
    Let's just tell it like it is: this is the NFL.  Being the NFL and not
    college, there's an 80% chance that Todd Marinovich is going to stink, 
    not this year but every year.  This is not a can't-miss, highly touted
    guy.  For all we know Todd's "sometimes all I want is everyone to leave 
    me alone so I can paint" statement still stands.  In other words, if
    you have the chance to bet the house on the Raiders going to the Super
    Bowl in the next five years, you might want to pass.
    
    HTH,
    glenn
    
40.675I thought he went pro after his 2nd year at USCJARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Sep 18 1992 18:116
    re .673:
    
    Didn't Marinovich skip both his junior and senior years?
    
    
    py
40.676ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 18 1992 18:425
    Marinovich did turn pro after his 2nd year in college.
    
    I think he's only 21 years old right now.
    
    Carlos
40.677 GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseFri Sep 18 1992 21:5312
    I caught some of a Raiders exhibition game on my dish, with Al
    (somebody) a VP for the Raiders doing the color commentary. The play by
    play guy, during a commercial break, was going over what they would
    talk about when Marinovich went into the game. The Play by Play guy
    wanted to talk about how mature Marinovich is, even though he left
    school 2 yrs early. The Raider VP told him *directly* that under no
    circimstances would they mention anything about Marinovich leaving
    school early. They didn't, either. The key was how "mature" he was for
    his age.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
40.678ELMAGO::CGRIEGOSat Sep 19 1992 14:335
40.679FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Sep 21 1992 12:165
    re: .677
    
    Al LoCasale
    
    John
40.6800-3CSC32::SALZERTue Sep 22 1992 18:335
    They loose the home opener. Schroeder did not start. 
    I didn't see or hear anything on this one. What happened?
    That's probably what the Raiders are asking too.
    
    BoB
40.681NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 22 1992 18:3911
       
    > They loose the home opener. Schroeder did not start. 
    > I didn't see or hear anything on this one. What happened?
    > That's probably what the Raiders are asking too.
    
    From the looks of it Todd did a pretty good Schroeder imitation with
    almost 400 yards passing in ~60 attempts but with 3 INTs and a couple 
    of fumbles...
    
    glenn
    
40.682MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedTue Sep 22 1992 18:576
    
    WARNING!  WARNING!  LOOSE/LOSE ALERT!  VOCABULARY POLICE ARE TRACING
    YOUR NOTE AT THIS VERY MOMENT!
    
    Dickstah, the LOOSE/LOSE control officer
    
40.683ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 22 1992 19:0735
    
        > They loose the home opener. Schroeder did not start.
        > I didn't see or hear anything on this one. What happened?
        > That's probably what the Raiders are asking too.
    
        >> From the looks of it Todd did a pretty good Schroeder 
        >> imitation with almost 400 yards passing in ~60 attempts
        >> but with 3 INTs and a couple of fumbles...
    
    Well, yup, that kind of sums it up. The thing that killed the Raiders
    this week is the same thing that's killed'em in the first two games,
    turnovers. The Raiders have got to be the worst team in the league
    right now as far as turnovers are concerned. They had 5 against the
    donks, 4 last week (?), and 6 this week. If the Raiders can get this
    under control they'll be tough to beat, but right now they're beating
    themselves. I mean, it's not like they can only come up with ~80 yards
    or so of total offense, unlike some other teams in the division :-),
    So far I think in each of their games they've dominated the teams
    they've played in most statistics except the W/L one and the turnover
    one. They've outgained the opponents offenses by about 100 + yards per
    game, led in time of possesion by about 10 minutes, and on and on....
    but they're still coming away with a loss because of the turnovers.
    Marinovich looked fairly good, but my biggest gripe is that he never
    seemed to look for any of his other receivers, except the guy he was
    throwing it to, all in all he performed pretty good though. I think he
    had the best day of all the QB's this weekend, 395 yards. The defense
    looked pretty good excepting those two break aways by Metcalf. Tim
    Brown and Sam Graddy looked good, amazing what a half way decent QB can
    do for receivers. If (and that's a big one) the faids can keep their
    turnovers down to two or less, I predict they'll get their first win
    against the Chiefs. Expect McGlokton to clog up the middle, causing a
    brick wall effect for the 'Nightmare'. 
    
    Carlos
    
40.684Gee Dickstah, looks like all heck is gonna break lose!AXIS::ROBICHAUDW I N D - It BlowsTue Sep 22 1992 19:421
    
40.685MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedTue Sep 22 1992 20:1422
    
    Scotty:  "But Captain, she's breakin' up!  Our LOOSE/LOSE controller
              canna du n'more!  She's overloadin' now!"
    
    Kirk:  "What's the matter with these people?  Surely there are Raiders
            fans, or Browns fans, or even Bruins fans who know the
            difference between Loose and Lose!"
    
    Spock:  "Highly unlikely, Captain."
    
    Kirk:  "Bones, what's happened to our chief LOOSE/LOSE officer?"
    
    Bones:  "He's dead, Jim."
    
    Kirk:  "Take over, then...that's an order!"
    
    Bones:  "Dammit Jim, I'm a doctor, not an English Teacher...."
    
    
    
    Dickstah
    
40.686SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Sep 22 1992 20:202
    Lou's?? Doesn't this belong in the ND note? Or Red Sox?
                               Denny
40.687Soon to be 0-4...BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-3!Wed Sep 23 1992 13:3913
>    I mean, it's not like they can only come up with ~80 yards
>    or so of total offense, unlike some other teams in the division :-),

I hear what you're sayin', but it's not like Denver is can't come up with any
wins, unlike some other teams in the division.

>    I think he
>    had the best day of all the QB's this weekend, 395 yards. 

Yea, but he threw 59 passes fer cryin' out loud!


Joe 
40.688meaningless blather......ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Sep 23 1992 18:3916
    Like I said in an earlier reply, if they can just get a handle on the
    turnovers they'll be good to go. According to todays AFC stats in the
    USA Today, the Raiders are dead last in the give/take, they've gotten 3
    turnovers but have given away 13. However, they also happen to be tied
    with Buffalo for the best offense in the AFC, and are ranked 4th on
    defense. They go against the Chiefs (on MNF) who are tied with San
    Diego for the #1 defense, on offense K.C. is ranked 8th, K.C. is also
    the best in the AFC in the give/take department. One more thing about
    todays stats, I just thought I'd mention that the donks have the worst
    offense in the AFC (and probably the league) and the second to last
    rated defense....thus far. Now whether all these stats mean anything or
    not....who knows? But if they do, I guess you donkey fans better get
    all your gloating in now, 'cause it ain't gonna lasted. :-)
    
    Carlos
    
40.689YA FER GOTTED SOMEFIN CSC32::J_HERNANDEZSoLetItBeWritten,SoLetItBeDoneWed Sep 23 1992 20:216
Yo Carlos another stat the Faids ain't keep losing is da final score. 

HTH


The Rams might inhale, but at least they didn't lose to da Donks and da Stains. 
40.690ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Sep 23 1992 21:1615
    >>The Rams might inhale, but at least they didn't lose to da
    >>Donks and da Stains.
    
    Well gee, Einstein, maybe that's cuz they haven't played the donks or
    stains.
    
    >>Yo Carlos another stat the Faids ain't keep losing is da final score.
    
    Yes....well, one more time, IF they can control their turnovers they
    will win these games that they're pretty much giving away. The reason
    that they are so terrible in the Wins/Losses stat, is because they are
    so terrible in the turnovers stat. 
    
    Carlostein
    
40.691IF....BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-3!Wed Sep 23 1992 21:401
    
40.692long seasonQUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesThu Sep 24 1992 13:041
      Put a "what" in front of that if and HP might hire you:^)
40.693ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 24 1992 14:5617
40.694PFSVAX::JACOBMartina's half the man Jimmy C. isThu Sep 24 1992 16:1310
    
    >>		Donks orally inhale!
    
    And this from a guy whose team ain't won a game yet, about a team
    that's 2-1.  Granted, it's a weak 2-1, but 2-1 nevertheless.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
40.695ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 24 1992 16:503
    What..?....Jake, you didn't find the article interesting, or what?
    
    Carlos
40.696CSC32::J_HERNANDEZSoLetItBeWritten,SoLetItBeDoneThu Sep 24 1992 18:021
    If ther Rams had the Faids' schedule they'd be 2-1. 
40.697ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 24 1992 18:2811
    Yeah...and if the faids were like da Rams their 0-3 would be
    justified. C'mon Jesse, everybody knows there's only one real NFL team
    in L.A., how long has it been since the Rams played in a post season
    game, anyhow?
    
    
    Carlos
    
    By the way, is all this faider bashing due to some repressed feelings
    of anguish caused by Dickerson being in L.A. again, but this time wif a
    real team? :-)
40.698(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBNot tonite, I've got a thumb-acheThu Sep 24 1992 18:3811
    >>By the way, is all this faider bashing due to some repressed feelings
    >>of anguish caused by Dickerson being in L.A. again, but this time wif a
    >>real team? :-)
    
    
    Dickerson is back with the Rams????
    
    I thought he was with the Faiders now!!
    
    JaKe
    
40.699Or does it hurt from suckling it?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 24 1992 19:266
40.700PFSVAX::JACOBNot tonite, I've got a thumb-acheThu Sep 24 1992 19:4411
    Carlos, 
    
    I been up here in school in Massachussetts for teh lasted 2 weeks.
    
      Get the big picture????
    
    Many (8^)*'s
    
   
    JaKe
    
40.701ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 24 1992 20:2812
    Rollward Jakey, I can definitely relate, I was up there myself this
    time lasted year.....and I never pitched so many tents in all my life
    if'n you know what I mean. It got so bad that during the lasted couple
    of weeks we were up there that, me, and the other tech that was with me
    training on flamingoid were starting to give the techs and engineers a
    hard time about it, telling 'em stuff like "Gee I wonder what you'd
    look like in a leather mini-skirt?" and stuff. One of the engineers,
    Leon Hesch, about peed his pants when my buddy told him he was starting
    to look cute. Oh well, take lots of cold showers and stay away from
    that pay-per-view. :-)
    
    Carlosowitz
40.702For a good time call ...-....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MAnd I'm bringing Bo and his big bad hip with meThu Sep 24 1992 20:316
    
    
         Jake may I suggest Piedmont street in Worcester?????
    
    
    Chap(PY)
40.703CNTROL::CHILDSGeorge Bush, mental wimpThu Sep 24 1992 20:352
 naw they closed Piedmont down....
40.704CSC32::J_HERNANDEZSoLetItBeWritten,SoLetItBeDoneThu Sep 24 1992 20:3535
    >>Yeah...and if the faids were like da Rams their 0-3 would be
    >>justified. 
    
    It is justified. Clearly Denver, Cincinnati, and Cleveland are much
    better squads then the Faids. Unterwise they wouldna lost. 
    
    
    >>C'mon Jesse, everybody knows there's only one real NFL team
    >>in L.A., 
    
    Yup, good call on that one Carlos, the Rams are in Anaheim.
    
    >>how long has it been since the Rams played in a post season
    >>game, anyhow?
    
    They were in the 1989 NFC Championchip Game. Got thrashed by 'Frisco. 
    
      
    >>By the way, is all this faider bashing due to some repressed feelings
    >>of anguish caused by Dickerson being in L.A. again, 
    
    Way to go carnac! I''m real jealous about a has-been who'se really
    ripping through defenses this year for an 0-3 team. Faids cain have
    him.
    
    >>but this time wif a real team? :-)

    That smiley shows that you are kidding, I'd kid too if my favorite
    team got beat by Cleveland and Denver, not to mention Cincinnati. Hows
    that feel?
    
    
    
    Jesse 
    
40.705ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 24 1992 21:107
    Well, Jesse, it's still way early in the season, and your awesome Rams
    are one whole and complete game ahead of the faids, so I guess I just
    gotta sit back and listen to you yap it up. But rest assured, when the
    1992 season's all been said and done, the faids will have proven
    themselves a better team than the Rams. HtH
    
    Carlos
40.706QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesThu Sep 24 1992 21:557
      Bash the faids,  not the Donks!  I hope you still don't wear that
    Rams jersey Jesse....
    
      The long season will be for both teams Carlos,  at least it will if
    the pace stays the same.
    
    	Tim
40.7070-2, 0-3, 0-4 oh myCSC32::SALZERFri Sep 25 1992 23:528
    Hey Carlos,
    
    I wouldn't be flaunting the recent Raider playoff record 
    in front of the Ram faithfull either.  Under their current
    head coach they're 0-2 in playoff games. They were both 
    a couple of yawners too.  
    
    BoB
40.708Here comes the cavalry Carlos.....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MAnd I'm bringing Bo and his big bad hip with meSat Sep 26 1992 18:2713
    
    
       Hey Bob,
    
    
              I believe they are 1-2 under there current coach in playoff
    games
    
         20-10 over Cincy 1990
    
            Just making sure you got your facts straight.....
    
    Chap(PY)
40.709Can't win when you give the other team the ballPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 28 1992 13:033
    FWIW, before yesterday's games, the Raiders had as much offense as
    Buffalo (as measured in yards).  The take away/give away differential
    is 14, however.
40.710Need more games to see how good their offense really is...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 28 1992 13:1114
    
    > FWIW, before yesterday's games, the Raiders had as much offense as
    > Buffalo (as measured in yards).  The take away/give away differential
    > is 14, however.
    
    Interesting but deceiving stat.  I'll bet Buffalo's efficiency is far 
    better.  When you turn the ball over a lot, you shorten the field for 
    the other team, shortening their possessions and lengthening yours, 
    allowing you to run many more plays.  Plus you fall behind and are 
    playing against soft defenses.  That's how Todd Marinovich was able to 
    pass for an impressive 395 yards at a weak ~6.5 yards/attempt.
    
    glenn
    
40.711CSC32::J_HERNANDEZSoLetItBeWritten,SoLetItBeDoneMon Sep 28 1992 15:471
    Yo Tim, I'm wearing the Ram Jersey today. 
40.712Jets are a push over?QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 28 1992 18:123
      Has anyone spilled anything on it yet? ;^)
    
      I heard they beat the AFC team of 1992.....
40.713ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 29 1992 14:0214
    Is it to early to start the "wait 'til nexted year" campaign?
    
    I don't even think HALogic could've helped 'em win lasted nites game.
    They did alright in the first half, but they really got their butts
    handed to them in the second. The offense did about as well as you
    could expect, with Marinovich starting only his 4th game in the NFL
    (his 3rd, and 3rd loss, against the Chiefs). The defense fell apart in
    the second half. The Chiefs just ran right over them. So much for
    McGlokton clogging up the middle. He wasn't even a factor, matter o
    fack I didn't see him in the game 'til about the last 5 minutes or so.
    
    Oh well, maybe they'll be able to beat the Chargers???
    
    Carlos
40.714CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttTue Sep 29 1992 14:4916
Saw some great footage/interviews with Ben Davidson last night
on one of those shows before MNF on ESPN.

Davidson was a monster when he played, and I guess Len Dawson interviewed
him.   It was great.


My favorite part was Ahmad Rashaad telling how they were playing the
Raiders and they got off the bus in their shirts and ties and looked
overa the Raiders getting off theirs.  Ahmad said that the Raiders looked
like a bunch of inmates from the Rahway State Prison!

I was rollward....


'SAw
40.715AXIS::ROBICHAUDNewEnglandPatriots-ItsGonnaTakeAlotTue Sep 29 1992 15:294
    	Hey 'Saw did they show the game (1970?) when Davidson started
    a fight that led the Raiders to win the game?
    
    				/Don
40.716CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttTue Sep 29 1992 15:497
I don't know.  I only had one eye on the TV, the other was on the newspaper.

I do remember them talking about Davidson giving Lenny Dawson an extra
little "stick".  Could that be it?


'Saw
40.717real loserHBAHBA::HAASSir TurtleTue Sep 29 1992 16:0410
Stat o' the night, courtesy ABC:

Eric Dickerson has loast 15 straight games, dating back to his "glory"
days at Indianapolis.

The Raiders outta do what the Colts did and suspend him and let him go
home. Lasted year, didn't the Colts win their only game - at the Jets? -
with Eric back home?

TTom
40.718CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Tue Sep 29 1992 16:495
Saw -

Did they show the clip of Davidson kicking Johnny Unitas in da tes-ti-cles?

JD
40.719Marinobitch sips......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MAnd I'm bringing Bo and his big bad hip with meTue Sep 29 1992 17:065
    
    
            Todd Marinovich =  Tony Eason in Silver and Black...
    
    Chap(PY)
40.720Snake my eye!CSC32::SALZERTue Sep 29 1992 17:1712
    Unbelievable. For the 1st time in probably the better part of 2 decades
    I was pulling for the Raiders to win one. It felt really strange.
    At the 1/2 I was yelling "PULL WHATSHISNAME. WE WANT JAY."
    Al didn't listen.  So what is it now?  Dickerson maybe?  No.
    Can't buy that. His burst for 6 was the only real high light 
    of the game for them.  This has the makings of a miserable year.
    This team needs to start back at square 0ne and quit looking
    around pointing fingers.  It's time for the BS to take a hike.
    
    BoB
    (Who's always liked a couple Raiders but not many.)
    
40.721AXIS::ROBICHAUDNewEnglandPatriots-ItsGonnaTakeAlotTue Sep 29 1992 17:246
    	The Raiders have never been the same since they left Oakland.
    The days of Davidson, Wells, Stabler, etc are gone forever.  The
    NFL is to concerned with image to let a team like that exist ever
    again.  The Raiders are living off their past manly image.
    
    				/Don 
40.722BTW, Raiders are 0-4...BSS::JCOTANCHJust Lose, BabyTue Sep 29 1992 19:1213
    I can't believe what I heard Deirdorf (sp?) say last night.  He was
    talking about the Raiders being 0-3 and how miserable it is to be
    playing on a winless team and how he was once on a team that started
    out 0-8.  He goes "Being on a football team that's 0-8 is like being a
    baseball team that's winless at the All-Star break."  You've gotta be
    kidding, Dan!  That is one of the absolute worst comparisons I have ever
    heard.  It's probably safe to say that it's *impossible* for a Major
    League baseball team to be winless after some 80 games, but it seems
    like you see an NFL team start out 0-8 every few years or so.  I still
    can't believe he said that.
    
    
    Joe  
40.723SLIMFAST side effects for Dan...AKOCOA::PETERSONPearl Jam, Toe Jam...same thingTue Sep 29 1992 19:145
    
    ...Don't worry Joe,.....him saying that can be attributed to too much
    SLIMFAST...
    
    ...Mel
40.724PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 29 1992 19:153
40.725SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Sep 29 1992 19:262
       I think that's understood Mac, but it's still a silly comparison.
                                    Denny
40.726CTHQ::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Tue Sep 29 1992 19:287
    Yabbut Mac,
    Dasticstickally you're correct.
    Dierdorf could have used a better comparison, comparing 0-8 to
    being officially eliminated by the All Star break. Same wavelength
    
    MikeL
    
40.727It's a long shot, but it could happenPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 29 1992 19:302
    Yabbut going 0-8 doesn't officially eliminate you from the NFL
    playoffs.  Look at last year's Jets who ended up at 8-8.
40.728BSS::JCOTANCHJust Lose, BabyTue Sep 29 1992 19:443
    What Denny said.
    
    Joe
40.729CSC32::SALZERTue Sep 29 1992 21:435
    And where did these guys get the term 'smallish'?
    So and so has smallish line backers. So and so is a smallish
    qb. 
    
    BoB
40.730WONDER::REILLYSean Reilly DTN 293-5983Wed Sep 30 1992 01:405
    
    I can't believe any body still leaves the sound on for MNF.  :^)
    Seriously, those clowns make me miss Cosell.
    
    
40.731new label=straw graspingCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeWed Sep 30 1992 01:4311
    Bob,
    re: "where did these guys get the term 'smallish'"
    
    Obviously from MikeL!
    
    many ->  ;^)
    
    I remain,
    vertically challenged but *NOT* smallish!
    Kev
    
40.732CAMONE::WAYWed Sep 30 1992 12:281
So what IS the worst record for a baseball team at the All-STar Break?
40.733Finished up at 54-107, bad almost beyond comprehension...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 30 1992 12:3612
                  
> So what IS the worst record for a baseball team at the All-STar Break?
    
    The 1988 Baltimore Orioles were the worst All-Star break team in recent 
    memory, and probably the worst since early this century.  They started 
    at 0-21, and had only won something like 20-25 games at the break. 
    That is much, much worse than going 0-8 in the NFL.  But while I didn't
    hear his comment, I suspect that Dierdork was only engaging in
    hyperbole.  Or was he really serious?
    
    glenn
    
40.734CAMONE::WAYWed Sep 30 1992 12:3813
Thanks Glenn.


Dierdork and hyperbole....  Well, the man is no rocket scientist.

If this was IBM and I had to make the call, I'd signal:


		Unintentional Hyperbole!



'Saw
40.735AXIS::CHAPPELCalling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.HowardWed Sep 30 1992 13:148
I saw a clip of ex-Patriot/current Raider Bob Golic on SportsCenter lasted
night.  He was talking about the Raiders current run of bad fortune.  But
what really struck me, was the way he talking, he sounded really &*#@'d up.
Like he was in a daze or something.   I guess playing linebacker for the Pats
and linemen for the Raiders will do that to a guy.  (And a few too many
whacks upside da haid too).

Chap
40.7360-4= I've Fallen and I Can't Get Up!!SALEM::HARRIS_KThu Oct 01 1992 08:3514
    Terry Roebiski (sp?) was FINALLY replaced as offensive coordinator for
    the Raiders last night, replaced by, I believe, Tom Walsh. With the
    team being 0-4, They should throw in some young players to the lineup.
    McGlocklen, Skrepnek, Nick Bell, and try Anthony Bell at MLB. Riki
    Ellison doesn't cut it. How many times can you over pursue a running
    play up the middle? Ellison did it all night. He followed Kreig after
    the handoff on every play, except of course when Kreig kept the ball,
    then he hit Word.
    
    Aundrey Bruce should not be starting at DE, he should come in on 3rd
    downs in passing situations as a rushing OLB. After a great week
    against Denver, Anthony Smith has not seen much action, why???  
    
    Kenn
40.737ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Oct 01 1992 14:0021
    Great news Kenn, about Robiskie I mean. It is about time, matter o fack
    it's way past time. Who's this Tom Walsh guy, any relation to Bill?
    Robiskie's game plans were highly predictable, dull, and not very
    effective. It was like: 1st down give it to Eric, 2nd down give it to
    Eric, 3rd & usually +5 try to pass. I thought Mike White would have
    been a good choice to replace Robiskie, but at this point even that
    sixty year old water boy that's been with the faids forever could
    probably do better. 0-6 is a very strong possibility, and I agree with
    you that they should get the youngsters in there to get some valuable
    experience, seeing as this years all but shot. Especially Marinovich,
    he's screwing up, but he's also learning from those mistakes; take the
    Monday nite game, he was getting pressure from all around and he tried
    to make something out of nothing and threw the ball and hit a defender
    right on the numbers.....a royal screw up.....but he learned, after
    that he tucked the ball away and took the sack two or three different
    times. Yup!, the faids are pulling a trick right out of the donks magic
    hat, they'll have a high draft choice (if there is a draft), they'll
    have a light schedule, and hopefully TM will have gained some valuable
    experience....faids to the bowl in '93.
    
    Carlos
40.7380-8??????SALEM::HARRIS_KFri Oct 02 1992 08:2812
    Carlos,
               Walsh was an offensive assistant along with Robiskie. Thats
    all I know about him. I agree that Marinovich will learn alot from
    playing this year. However, I also fell as if they have as good of
    chance to go 0-8 as 0-6. They have the Giants, Bills, Cowboys and the
    Eagles in their next 4 games, OUCH! After watching 3 games this year,
    we didn't get to see the Cleveland game, I can't believe they let KC
    sign Joe Phillips NG form SD. Every team has been busting the ball
    right up the gut on them, but they don't feel as if they need DL
    help??? It's gonna be a long year, but what are you gonna do??
    
    Kenn
40.739CSC32::J_HERNANDEZSLAP&gt; Wait, oh how sweet!Fri Oct 02 1992 17:101
Does anyone have the linescore for the Faids/Chiefs game?
40.740maybeHBAHBA::HAASSir TurtleFri Oct 02 1992 17:1814
LA Raiders	0	7	0	0	-	7
Kansas City	0	10	0	17	-	27

Raiders' Score:
	Dickerson, 40 run

Chiefs' Scores:
	Krieg, 3 run (2nd)
	Lowery, 22 FG (2nd)
	Krieg, 7 run (4th)
	Lowery, 41 FG (4th)
	Mincy, 25 interception (4th)

TTom
40.741ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Oct 05 1992 14:4032
    	Well, well, well.........
    	My, my, my...............
    	Hmmm, hmmm, hmmm.........
    
    NFC East=0, Faids=1; The faids finally win one! And against a tough
    Giants team. Simms is one of the best....tough as nails he is, Anthony
    Smith gave Phil a nice little welcome to the coliseum when he came
    rushing up behind Simms just as Simms was about to throw the ball,
    needless to say he was a little shaken up, but kept on playing....
    then a few plays later he got bent over backwards, I thought he was
    gonna break in two, but still, he kept on going....he's as bad as that
    energizer bunny. Hopefully, this win will help Marinovich and the rest
    of the team get their confidence back. The new offensive co-ordinator,
    Tom Walsh, did a good job of implementing plays that are better suited
    for Marinovich's talents. They only threw two or three passes beyond
    twenty yards. Marinovich was 14-23 for 216 yards and most importantly
    ZERO interceptions. Jeff Jaeger, who represented the Raiders lasted
    year in the pro-bowl and was almost automatic lasted year, has already
    missed 8 field goals including two yesterday (45 yds & 38 yds), before
    coming in, in the 4th quarter to kick a 54 yarder that put the game
    away for the Raiders. This, IMHO, was a very gutsy call by Shell, but
    it also was the right call as hopefully Jaeger's confidence will also
    be boosted because of it. Some of those eight missed field goals
    could've been the difference in wins/losses for the faids, since all
    their losses except the KC game were very close ones, and even in the
    KC game a missed field goal is what seemed to shift the momentum, the
    faids could've gone on top 10-0, but instead ended up giving KC
    excellent field position as well as getting the KC fans riled up.
    Up next, da Bills. 
    
    Carlos
    
40.742CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 14:453
 not to burst your bubble or anything Carlos but the Giants suck. 1-3 with the
 worst coach in the league is hardly a great or even good team....
40.743CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 05 1992 14:549
> not to burst your bubble or anything Carlos but the Giants suck. 1-3 with the
> worst coach in the league is hardly a great or even good team....

Yeah, ditto.

I couldn't have said it any better.....


'Saw
40.744To me, it was like winning the superbowl!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Oct 05 1992 14:585
    Gee Mike, thanks for not bursting my bubble like that......
    with friends like you, who needs enemas...(sp?)
    
    Carlos
    
40.745CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 15:196
>    Gee Mike, thanks for not bursting my bubble like that......
>    with friends like you, who needs enemas...(sp?)
    
  the Giants coaching staff could use a few brain enemas.......    

40.746CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 05 1992 15:2812
>  the Giants coaching staff could use a few brains enemas.......    

Slight correction Mike:

	the Giants coaching staff could use a few brains


Ray Must Go!


'Saw

40.747BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 05 1992 15:4010
    Looked like they had a helluva crowd out there at the Coliseum.  Anyone
    get shot during the game?
    
    Well, I have to say...
    
    
     Go Raiders!!  Beat the over-rated Bills!  (I'm not joking, either!)
    
    
    Joe
40.7481-4 and moving up...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCowboys sip......Mon Oct 05 1992 17:1417
    
    
         YES!!!!
        
    
      The Raider D played real well yesterday, Marinovich still SUC#s I was
    praying his hand was broken when he hit that Raider linemans helmet.
    Jay wasn't no great QB but he's better than that mutton head Todd.
    Browns TD could have been a TD int return the other way. What gets me
    was that willie Gault was wide open in the replay of that play. That
    would have been a much safer pass.
    
                  I love the Raiders but yesterdays game was just a Bandaid
    to cover up the bleeding. Marinovich is not the answer Jay isn't either
    but at least he knows the questions. 
    
    Chap(PY)
40.749To soon to tell....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Oct 06 1992 14:2216
40.750BSS::JCOTANCHTue Oct 06 1992 15:224
    Last week on MNF they said Marinovich has only started something like
    15 games since high school. 
    
    Joe
40.751CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 06 1992 15:4316
No wonder he has that "I don't have a clue" look in his eyes.

And only someone with that little experience could call a timeout
between two plays where you just fall to one knee.

The Raiders got a gift on Sunday, from a team that should be 3-1, not
1-3, but who have the handicap of the worst coach in their history....


Had to love Howie Long's comment though -- after Pepper Johnson said
"we got beat by a bunch of ducks", Howie said "If we're ducks, what
are they?  Sparrows?"



'Saw
40.752Playoffs are still a very slim possibility!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Oct 06 1992 19:5021
    >>The Raiders got a gift on Sunday, from a team that should be 3-1,
    >>not 1-3,
    
    Tweren't no gift thar 'Saw, there was no free giveaways that decided
    the outcome of this one. Basically, it was all Giants in the first
    half, and all Raiders in the second. The Raiders too, are a team that
    should be 4-1 and not 1-4, in all the previous games excepting the MNF
    game against the Chiefs, the faids have dominated there opponents
    in all categories excepting turnovers, and as a result, final scores,
    and W/L's. Which was the key to victory over the Giants, they only had
    one turnover. The defense pretty much shutdown the Giants in the second
    half. I think in the 1st half the Giants had approx. 240 total yards,
    but in the second half they only had ~35 total yards.  (this might be
    wrong cause I'm going from memory). The offense also rose to the
    occassion, and were able to put 13 unanswered points on the board, 
    without turning the ball over as they've grown accustomed to doing.
    My point being that, they weren't given nothing, they went out and
    earned everything they got Sunday.
    
    Carlos
    
40.753ROULET::WHITEHAIRWed Oct 07 1992 11:428
    
    	should be....should be....should be......should be.....should be...
    
    	Yea, the Browns should be 3-1 instead of 1-3 too.
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
40.754CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Oct 07 1992 12:4823
Don't have to have giveaways for a game to be a gift.

There's no reason at all for the Giants not to have had 14 points on the
board at the end of the first half.   Well, there is a reason -- shoddy
play, and mental unawareness.

In the second half, the Giants defense must've gone to Disneyworld and
let some tutu-wearing ballet company take over.  Oh, that WAS the 
Giants defense.....8^)


FWIW, there are some serious problems in the Giants camp right now.
If LT, admittedly old, but still a team leader, had any faith in the
management's ability to deal with this crisis, then he would not have
gone to play golf and blown off a meeting.

The Giants gave that game away, with poor play, poor coaching, 
complacency, and mental errors.

That's what I meant....


'Saw
40.755ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Oct 07 1992 13:2013
40.756AXIS::CHAPPELCalling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.HowardWed Oct 07 1992 14:0020
40.757CSC32::M_MACGREGORWed Oct 07 1992 14:112
    The problem with the Patriots is that they ARE half the team people
    thought they would be 8^)
40.758AXIS::CHAPPELCalling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.HowardWed Oct 07 1992 14:2911
40.759Is Don leading me astray?CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Wed Oct 07 1992 15:305
 But Chap, Don told me that you bought the season tickets like him, for the
 sole purpose of watching the Cheerleaders...what gives???

 ;^)
40.760AXIS::CHAPPELCalling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.HowardWed Oct 07 1992 15:355
Believe me Mike, the cheerleaders are the ONLY reason I haven't already
given up my tickets.  :-)


Chap
40.761ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Oct 07 1992 18:4721
    Meanwhile back at the faider ranch..........
    
    The Raiders 3rd ranked defense (AFC) is preparing to meet the Bills'
    number one ranked offense. The Raiders have the best defense against
    the pass in the AFC, but will be given a tough test against the
    Bills....maybe?....maybe not though, because Kelly ruptured a bursa-sac
    in his throwing elbow. On the other side of the ball, hopefully the new
    and improved shorter set, that new offensive co-ordinator Tom Walsh
    implemented last week will reap further dividends against a somewhat
    suspect Buffalo secondary. The keys for the faids:
    
    *shut down Thermal.
    *limit the turnovers & mental errors that've haunted them all season.
    *And last, but most importantly, they need excellent special teams
     play, both on coverage and returns. I think this game will be decided 
     by the special teams units on both teams.
     
    
    Carloski
    
40.762They ain't dead yet!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Oct 12 1992 13:2324
    Too bad the Raiders can't play against New Yohk teams every week, last
    week it was the Giants, this week da Bills. The faids were 0-4 in Sept.
    but so far they are 2-0 in Oct., and with yesterdays win and tonights
    blow-out of the Doinks, the faids will only be two games down from both
    the Chiefs and Doinks with a very good possibility of pulling within
    one game after nexted week. Now for a little game review:
    
    The Raider defense played a most excellent game, limiting the #1
    offense in the NFL to a mere 3 points. Thermal shoulda stayed in
    Buffalo, it was the second week in a row that he's been totally
    shutdown. Kelly was feeling pressure throughout the game, although he
    did manage to pass for just over 300 yards. The Raiders on offense
    played a very good first half, with young Marinovich throwing for two
    TD's, one of which was a rare Eric Dickerson reception. The Raiders had
    two other scoring opportunities in the first half as well, but couldn't
    execute. IMHO, Ronnie Lott is on course for another Pro-bowl season,
    the 49'ers blew it when they let him get away. In the second half, the
    Raider offense sputtered, and they gave da Bills way to many chances to
    get back in it, fortunately the defense held their ground. Up next, the
    Seahawks at the Kingdome.........
    
    Carloski
    
    
40.763AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowMon Oct 12 1992 13:491
    	The Bills haven't been the same since playing the Patriots.
40.764Raiders Trade For Alexander WrightSALEM::HARRIS_KTue Oct 13 1992 19:5416
    I was very impressed with the play of Aarron Wallace and Anthony Bell
    Sunday. They did a great job slowing down the slant patterns over the 
    middle, which the Bills have killed them with over the years. Anthony
    Smith was very impressive rushing Kelly, and what more can be said
    about the game Howie played! I've blasted him all year and he comes
    through with a game like this.
    
    With the exception of the early Int., Marinovich played well. The
    running game could use a jump start, but you can't have everything.
    
    The Raiders traded a conditional draft pick to Dallas for WR Alexander
    Wright. There are alot of rumors that the Silver and Black have put
    Greg Townsend on the Block. I do not like the idea of trading him.
    
    
    Kenn
40.765ROYALT::ASHECrocostimpy, Quest que c'est?Tue Oct 13 1992 20:322
    Rumor was Townsend for Toon.  They got their WR.  Sounds like Townsend
    stays put.
40.766from the internet......ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 14 1992 14:5170
        LOS ANGELES (UPI) -- In the space of two weeks, the Los Angeles
    Raiders have begun to climb out of a hole. The Buffalo Bills,
    meanwhile,
    have started to dig themselves one.
            The Raiders closed down Buffalo's high-powered attack Sunday,
    registering a 20-3 upset victory highlighted by two touchown throws
    from Todd Marinovich.
            Bills quarterback Jim Kelly completed 26 passes for 302 yards
    on 45
    attempts. But he was sacked five times for 49 yards in losses and over
    the last two games -- both losses -- Buffalo has totaled a lone
    touchdown.
           ``I wish I knew the answer to why we are playing the way we
    are,''
    said Kelly. ``We can move the football, but we just can't get it into
    the endzone ltely.''
            Buffalo fell to 4-2, two games behind the AFC leading Miami
    Dolphins,
    while the Raiders climbed to 2-4 and enjoy renewed hope they can be a
    factor in the AFC West race.
            The Raiders opened the scoring on a 2-yard touchdown reception
    by
    Eric Dickerson from Marinovich 9:59 into the game.
            Marinovich's second touchdown pass -- a 52-yard strike to Tim
    Brown
    with 10:25 left in the second qarter -- gave Los Angeles a 14-3 lead.
        Jeff Jaeger kicked a 45-yard field goal later in the second quarter
    as the Raiders took a 17-3 lead into halftime. Jaeger added a 36-yard
    field goal in the third.
            Marinovich completed 11 of 21 passes for 188 yards and two
    touchdowns
    with one interception. Dickerson led the Raiders with 52 yards on 16
    carries.
            Buffalo's Thurman Thomas ran for 52 yards on 16 carries, but
    was
    plagued by a neck injury. Club officials said after the game Kelly also
    had aggravated an elbow injury.
            ``To beat a team as good as the Bills will help us the rest
    of the
    year,'' said Marinovich. ``It waas reaas realy fun watching our defense play
    so well today.''
            Bufalo's only points came on a 25-yard field goal by Steve
    Christie
    and that kick came about only because Blls punter Chris Mohr was forced
    to scramble for a first down when the Raiders rush headed by Elvis
    Pattrson prevented him from getting off a punt.
            ``I felt Patterson had a great jump on the snap,'' sid Mohr.
    ``He
    would have definitly blocked the punt if I had not let him fly by.''
            The touchdown throw from Marinovidh to Brown ended an 80-yard
    scoring
    drive.
        ``It is really fun when you have a guy like Tim (Brown) to throw
    to,''
    said Marinovich. ``Even with our shakey start, I knew we could dominate
    some teams like we did today.''
        ``It's a great victory for this organization,'' said Raiders Coach
    Art Shell. ``I'm so proud of these guys. If we keep playing like this
    we
    will be tough to deal with.''
            Buffalo Coach Marv Levy chose to credit the Raiders rather than
    worry
    about his team's two-game losing streak.
            ``Te Raiders have played a little better lately than people
    think,''
    Levy said. ``We dug a hole and we needd to get out of it so we had to
    throw the ball. We were straining to get into the endzone and we didn't
    make it.''
    
    Carlos                 
40.767AFC QB Rankings...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 14 1992 15:4637
    Passing                        att cmp   pct  yds td int
    
    Kelly, Buf                     192 118  61.5 1636 11   7
    Moon, Hou                      172 115  66.9 1361 12   9
    Krieg, KC                      149  88  59.1 1215  6   3
    Marino, Mia                    184 110  59.8 1331  7   5
    O'Donnell, Pit                 142  83  58.5 1088  4   3
    Marinovich, LA                 129  70  54.3  960  4   6
    Millen, NE                     159 102  64.2  972  6  10
    Nagle, NY                      154  75  48.7  980  4   4
    Elway, Den                     153  80  52.3 1012  4   6
    Stouffer, Sea                  127  61  48.0  591  2   3
    Humphries, SD                  150  80  53.3  863  3   8
    George, Ind                     72  34  47.2  428  2   4
    Esiason, Cin                   125  68  54.4  645  4   9
    
    Looks like Marinovich is starting to move up a little in the rankings.
    His totals ain't bad either considering he missed the firsted two
    games. His TD/Int ratio isn't very good, but it's to be expected from a
    greenhorn. Here's something you doink fans might enjoy, a comparison of
    a greenhorn to a seasoned vet, BBJ:
    
    Passing                        att cmp   pct  yds td int
    
    Marinovich, LA                 129  70  54.3  960  4   6
    Elway, Den                     153  80  52.3 1012  4   6
    
    They're pretty close, Marinovich has a little bit better completion
    percentage, BBJ has a little bit more yards (and two extra games), and
    they have the exact same TD/Int ratio. In fairness to BBJ though, the
    faids have a better line, better backs, and debatably, better
    receivers.
    
    HtH
    
    Carloski
    
40.768ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 14 1992 16:0410
    Hey Kenn, I like the Alexander Wright trade, also heard on ESPN this
    morning that the Argonauts (?), don't want Rocket around no more...
    Can you imagine Timmy Brown, A. Wright, and the Rocket going down field 
    at the same time....whoa mama!
    
    Also, I think I remember hearing during the Raider/Buffalo game, that
    somebody axed uncle Al if the trade rumors about Townsend were true,
    and he said not only "no" but, "no &#*%ing way".
    
    Carlos
40.769CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Oct 14 1992 16:285
    Yo Carloski,
    Has Tim Brown overcome his fumbleitis??
    
    MikeL
    
40.770Re T.BrownELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 14 1992 17:196
    Welp, he's got two so far.....
    
    but, he's also got three TD's so far too, I'll take those odds anyday.
    
    Carlopski
    
40.771WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MGEORGE GET A U HAULWed Oct 14 1992 17:193
    
    
             Yes!   But Alexander Wright can't catch.
40.772DECWET::METZGERWed Oct 14 1992 17:2211

And the Rocket can't get open. Watching some of the CFL games he clearly
hasn't progressed past the college level. He still doesn't know how to
run a pass route or how to drive a defender off or how to fake the 
post and go to the corner...

Tommy did you read the SI on Mandarich a few weeks ago?


Metz
40.773ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 14 1992 17:557
40.774ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinThu Oct 15 1992 19:0919
    Ok, how 'bout some good 'ol faider trivia.
    
    The faids only have two QB's on the active roster, if'n they both go
    down guess who'd be there emergency QB? -------> Marcus Allen.
    
    Who is the only offensive rookie on the active roster?
    ----->Greg Skrepenak.
    
    What faider WR has  gold and  silver Olympic medals?
    ----->Sam Graddy. (he also set the world record for the 60 yard dash)
    
    At the start of this season, Greg Townsend was second in career sacks
    among all active NFL players. How many did he have? ----> 95.
    
    Which Pro baseball team drafted Todd Marinovich?--->Calif. Angels
    
    Carloski
    
    
40.775QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 15 1992 19:173
    Carlitos...  You're supposed to hold the answers for a bit...
    
    BG
40.776~/~GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPipsqueak Aryan CabbageheadThu Oct 15 1992 19:198
    More trivia:       
    
    
    
    
    Who cares?
    
    Mark.
40.777ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinThu Oct 15 1992 19:449
40.778ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinThu Oct 15 1992 19:549
40.779at best, raiders finish 8-8QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 15 1992 20:579
    Hey, Carlitos...
    
     You know better than that, buddy...  I always take my lumps when the
    mighty donks roll over and play dead.  I beleive I predicted at the 
    begining of this year that the donks would stink it up.  But....
    I bet I still win my bet with Uncle Hootsie.  (bet was donks finish
    with better record that faiders)
    
    BG
40.780Can the Raiders Come back...RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 16 1992 16:276
    Im glad the Raiders won last week, but I almost cried on that 1st
    interception.  A Very good, Timed pass to Ethan Horton in the corner
    and the Damm Defense reads it perfect and gets there BARELY on time
    to snatch it out of his hands for the interception :-( ...
    
    Ethan Horton is my Starting TE in the FFL... He hasnt done squat yet
40.781AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowFri Oct 16 1992 21:363
    	How come the Raiders don't play Nick Bell more?
    
    			/Don(for Metz)
40.782The Div. the worst in some time !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 15:355
     How come the faiders play in the NFL...  They should be playing
    in the now gone WLAF...  along with the rst of the AFC West !!
    
    BG
    
40.783elkless, but had a great timeELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 21 1992 14:5830
    This is a little late, because I was off elk hunting (without any
    luck), but the faids shutout the seahawks 19-0. I expected the faids to
    win this one, but I thought the seahawks might have been a little less
    cooperative. The Raiders usually have a hard time of it up in Seattle.
    Marinovich sprained a knee and is questionable for this weekends
    matchup against the 'pokes, this is a bummer because I think with TM in
    there the faids might've done a number on the 'pokes, but if Shredder
    gets the start.....who knows what'll happen, but it'll proberly be
    another vintage Shredder choke. Nick Bell played against the Seahawks,
    and had a great day. He had somthing like 10 carries for close to 100
    yards, and the faids had a total of 176 rushing yards. The faider
    defense is playing up to par, since the second half of the Giants game
    the faids have allowed a grand total of 3 points to be scored against
    them. They'll have their work cut out for them this weekend stopping
    Emmitt, and Irvin, which by the way I believe is the key for the faids.
    This plus it would be nice if Marinovich were in there to pick apart
    Dallas' somewhat suspect secondary, which is their weak point. These
    two teams went at it during a pre-season scrimmage, and they had a
    couple of friendly little brawls which should bring back pleasant
    memories for this weekends matchup. I believe Russell Maryland and
    Steve Wiesniewski in particular might have a little bit of unfinished 
    business. Should be a good game.
    
    Predictions:
    
    If Marinovich plays ..... Raiders by +7
    If Shredder plays ....... ? (proberly won't be such a good game)
    
    Carlitos
    
40.784You're such a character !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 21 1992 17:468
     Not a bad analysis Carlitos...  Uncharacteristically based on reality,
    which is certinly uncharacteristic of a Faider fan !!    ;^)
    
    Big Game Hunter
    
    
    
40.785CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Oct 21 1992 17:5013
>     Not a bad analysis Carlitos...  Uncharacteristically based on reality,
>    which is certinly uncharacteristic of a Faider fan !!    ;^)
>    
>    Big Game Hunter


Do you guys know each other?


Just curious....    
    
    

40.786Just an Uncle Hootsie By Anyother Name !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 21 1992 17:533
    Never met Da Bum...  At least not that I know of !!!  
    
    BG
40.787ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 21 1992 19:1216
40.788CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadWed Oct 21 1992 19:1810
40.789QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 21 1992 19:2912
    Carloskiwitz...
    
     I would never in a million years come over to the Silver and Black.
    This is a team without a sense of right or wrong, without morals,
    without QB.  Uncle Al Davis is surely a member of organized crime,
    the shades he wears prove it!  
    
    Silver and Black,   AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK !!!!
    
    I think I'm Gonna Hurl.......
    
    BG
40.790ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 21 1992 20:008
40.791CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicThu Oct 22 1992 11:3814
Well, Carlos, you're almost correct.

Bob has a Mel Gibson body wif a Uncle Charlie head.


Me?  I'm built like Arnold Schwarzenegger, and I'm as handsome as
Mel Gibson, with a sense of humor like Robin Williams.....


hth,
'Saw


8^)
40.792GENRAL::WADEThu Oct 22 1992 12:244
    
    	BG looks and acts like Pee Wee Herman! :^)
    
    Claybroon
40.793PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 22 1992 12:555
40.794CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicThu Oct 22 1992 12:598
>    After reading that, all I can sayis that Robin's sense of humor isn't
>    as warped as yours...


8^)


A little humor from the Dark Side....
40.795ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinThu Oct 22 1992 14:2413
    Back to the faids....ESPN reported yesterday that Marinovich will be
    playing.....but ya gotta wonder how effective he'll be, especially
    after seeing the way Cortez Kennedy (+300lbs) landed on him. Still
    though, I'd rather have a young, hurt, inexperienced Marinovich in
    there than a healthy Shredder. In fairness to Jay, he has won some big
    games for the faids and it's possible that he could come in and have a
    great game, but I still feel better with TM in there.
    
    Also, I wonder if Alexander Wright will see any playing time against
    his former teammates, often times it seems like players that get traded
    away have something to prove against their former teams.
    
    Carlos
40.796Butt Head !!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 22 1992 15:378
    
     Thats pretty cold Clabroon...   Especially from a guy who ain't
    even manly enough to bring home any "Big Game" from the hunt...
    
    BG
    
    P.s.  Claybroon looks like Ross Perot with bigger ears
    
40.797QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 22 1992 15:403
    Don't matter...  Faids lose by 10 this week !!
    
    BG
40.798Unless ma Niners git going lateCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Thu Oct 22 1992 15:468
    Why don't youse AFC Westerners face da music.
    Y'all gonna git kilt by whoever comes outta the AFC East
    (Miami/Buffalo) who i turn are gonna get kilt by whoever comes ouuta
    the NFC East ( Washington/Dallas, sorry Iggles).
    
    JMHO
    MikeL
    
40.799Raiders 24 Cowadholescents 10......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSunday doomsday for Troysie in LAThu Oct 22 1992 19:5112
    
    
    
         I don't think so MikeL. If the Raiders get out of the AFC Best
    they will kick Buffalo's butt again than lose to Houston Cause we don't
    have a QB. See Todd sips and See Jay sips. I just haven't figured out
    who sips more.
    
      Than Philly will take Houston apart. And we'll have to go through
    another year of NFC dominance talk in the media.
    
    Chap(PY) 
40.800PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 22 1992 19:536
40.801GENRAL::WADEThu Oct 22 1992 20:286
    
    	Yup, you're wrong.  They moidered the Raiders in Buffalo.  :*)
    
    	It was something like 51-3.
    
    Claybroon
40.802QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 22 1992 20:453
    Raiders ain't gonna get past Denver !!!
    
    BG
40.803BSS::JCOTANCHThu Oct 22 1992 21:369
    
>    I may be wrong here, but after losing to the Raiders in the regular
>    season, didn't Buffalo win a playoff game in LA, beating the Raiders by
>    a record margin in the process?

Buffalo beat them in the regular season also (we're talking about '90 I
assume).  And Wade's right, Buffalo beat the Faids 51-3 in Buffalo.

Joe
40.804CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHMelanie's formula - $70/caseFri Oct 23 1992 11:422
The latest I've heard is that Marinovitch will play Sunday.  Think it was 
on ESPN.
40.805ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinFri Oct 23 1992 18:2711
    Should be interesting to see how well Terry McDaniel does against
    Michael Irvin. I think the Cowboys are gonna be in for a shock. Other
    key matchups will be (IMHO): Russell Maryland vs Steve Wisniewski,
    Charles Haley vs Bruce Wilkerson, Larry Brown vs Willie Gault, Issiac
    Holt vs Tim Brown. Also expect Tolbert and Casillas to have good days
    against McElroy and Peat on the right side. I think as a result of
    McDaniel shutting down Irvin's production, that Novacek is gonna see
    alot of action.
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
40.806PFSVAX::JACOBIs Ross Perot the Deliverance Dude??Fri Oct 23 1992 18:3910
    
    >>Michael Irvin. I think the Cowboys are gonna be in for a shock. Other
    
    Ya, they'll be shocked.  The Cowboys will be shocked by the ease at
    which they'll rack up points against the weak Faider team.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
40.807Somebody give JaKe a cup of coffee....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinFri Oct 23 1992 19:2713
40.808Confirmed?CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHMelanie's formula - $70/caseFri Oct 23 1992 19:271
So is Marinovitch in?
40.809(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBIs Ross Perot the Deliverance Dude??Fri Oct 23 1992 19:3826
    
>>    C'mon JaKe, I'd think you'd have enuf to worry about with an even weaker
>>    Steeler team going up against what IMHO is the class of the AFC (right
>>    now anyhow), the Chiefs, without you having to come in here and spew
  
      Re the Steelers, Hey, they're expected to lose this one, so if they do,
    no biggy, and if they should pull out a win, it's gravy time.  I'll be
    drinking some good beer, eating munchies and I'll be rooting fer the
    Steelers, but I really don't expect fer them to beat the Chiefs.
    
    
    >>all this trash. And besides, if allowing a mere 3 points in the last 10
    >>quarters is considered a weak Faider team, I can hardly wait 'til they
    >>get better. :-)
    
    Even a blind pig finds an ear of corn once in it's lifetime!!  Who were
    the faiders opponents, the Wilmington school for Wayward Neo-Nazi
    Skinhaid Differently-Abled Height Disadvantaged Girls?????? and the
    Wizohinken Boys Club????
    
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
    
40.810ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinFri Oct 23 1992 19:514
    Today's USA Today has Marinovich listed as probable. I think he'll be
    starting, but I don't know if he'll be finishing.
    
    Carlos
40.811ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinFri Oct 23 1992 20:2232
40.812PFSVAX::JACOBIs Ross Perot the Deliverance Dude??Sat Oct 24 1992 00:3417
    
    >>Don't drag your girlfriends into this now, JaKe....talking football is
    >>one thang...but this is entirely different...:-)
    
    How do you know, you seeing her now, eh???  (8^)*
    
    Lessee, 6 of those 10 quarters were against the league's most potent
    offenses, huh???  I'm talking the seachickens and the Gnats.
    
    As fer Buffalo, I remember when the Steelers were beating the crap out
    of everybody(I have a good memory), and they went into San Diego
    favored by a million, (or more), and got blown out something like 47-0.
    
    Everybody has an off day, and that was the Bills' bad day.
    
    JaKe
    
40.813CSC32::SALZERSat Oct 24 1992 03:075
    AHHhhh... It's enough to warm the heart of any NFL fan.
    I think we are witnessing a flareup in the old Raider 
    Steelers grudge. 
    
    BoB
40.814CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 26 1992 12:028
Boy, reading back a few notes, it sure is funny.


Raiders got kicked bad by the Cowboys, and when I went to bed last night
the Steeler had a, ahem, COMMANDING lead on the Chiefs....


'Saw
40.815At least the doinks and Chiefs lost too.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Oct 26 1992 14:2411
    Faids lose 28-13, ... no excuses, the better team won. Emmitt's a stud, 
    I said lasted week that if the faids could stop Emmitt and Irvin they'd
    win....well they stopped Irvin, but couldn't handle Emmitt. The faids
    are now 1-1 vs NFC East, and they get a week off before facing the
    Eagles at the Vet. 'Saw says the faids 'got kicked bad', but IMHO it
    wasn't that bad. It was a good game, and even up into the third quarter
    it could have went either way. Still, hats off to the Cowboys, and
    while I'm at it, also to the Steelers and JaKe.
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
40.816CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 26 1992 14:2511
>    Eagles at the Vet. 'Saw says the faids 'got kicked bad', but IMHO it
>    wasn't that bad. It was a good game, and even up into the third quarter


I didn't see hardly any of the game -- just saw Todd get sacked and
Smith run untouched into the end zone.  

I was watching the Pats game -- which was pretty exciting actually.....

'Saw    

40.817WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MSunday doomsday for Troysie in LAMon Oct 26 1992 14:469
    
    
    
            Marinovich SIPPPPPPPPPPPP's
    
    God I hate that guy. He is not a QB he reminds me of a cross between
    Tony Eason and Mark Wilson. He's the sole reason the Raiders lost so
    bad he missed open recievers all day and fumbled twice losing one of
    them.
40.818ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Oct 26 1992 15:5530
    Hey Chappy, what do you expect, he's still way green. He's got a total
    of 7 NFL games worth of experience to draw from, and the mistakes he's
    making are to be expected. You can't expect the kid to come in and play
    like Montana or Marino...etc..etc... at least not yet anyhow! The
    veteran players like Marcus, Dickerson, Gault etc...have to step in now
    and make some plays to get the pressure off of Marinovich. Aikman's
    been wif da 'boys for ~5 years now, and he's just recently started to
    come into his own. And if you go back and look at the careers of most
    of all the great QB's you might find that their first couple of years
    in the league they sucked. IMHO, Marinovich did a good job (at least as
    good as everybody else on the team) yesterday, especially considering
    that they played one of the top teams in the NFL. Question is, 'is he
    getting any better, does he learn from his mistakes, or does he keep
    making the same bonehaided blunders week after week?'. Answer: (again
    IMHO) Yes, he is getting better and he does seem to be learning from
    his mistakes. Why yesterday I noticed that TM walked up to the line,
    checked everything out and seen that there was a mis-match between
    Gault and the Dallas defender, so he calls an audible changing the
    original play and launched a bomb to a wide open Willie Gault.
    Unfortunately the ball was just a foot or two ahead of Gaults reach or
    else it's 6 points on the board. The point is he's growing, little by
    little, he's growing. Next time (hopefully) he'll not only read the
    defense, but deliver the ball accurately, and he goes from bum to hero.
    Right now because of his greenness, TM's more of a liability for the
    faids than an asset, but I think that nexted year around this time TM
    will start to be a major factor against opposing teams. For the rest of
    this year expect moments of brilliance mixed with moments of ugliness.
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
40.819IMNSHOWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Mon Oct 26 1992 17:1316
    
    
              Carlos when the rest of the team is playing great Football
    ie. Howie, Ronnie, Dickerson, A. Smith, you need a QB that will at
    least keep you in a game. He is not improving! Go back and watch the
    Highlights... Anytime he gets even a modest rush he gets happy feet
    and throws the ball away or into a dangerous situation. Gault had his
    man beat all day and TODDIE couldn't get the ball to him. We could have
    scored TD for TD with that team. Schroeder is a bonehead but at least
    he keeps you somewhat in the game. Neither guy is the answer.
    
              He doesn't compare to Stabler's early career or any other
    moderately good QB. If you like the Raiders as much as I do you'll come
    to see this in time.
    
    HE"S A FU%&**G BUM..........
40.820ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Oct 26 1992 19:0420
40.821CSOA1::JACOBMets in '93Mon Oct 26 1992 19:3524
    >>it could have went either way. Still, hats off to the Cowboys, and
    >>while I'm at it, also to the Steelers and JaKe.
    
    Thanks Carlo(insert whatever here)s
    
    Actually, lasted night, I sat down with a case of Penn Pilsner, a GREAT
    locally brewed beer, on ice, and tons of munchies.  We had some friend
    over for dinner and the game.  The night started out horrible as the
    roast beef turned out WELL done(shoulda been medium), the gravy burnt,
    one of my kids dumped his plate of food all over the floor, and so on
    and so forth.  I figgered by game time that everything else had gone
    down the crapper, so I might as well sit down, start downing brewskis,
    and munching cause this game, the Chiefs would probably bring the 4-2
    Steelers back sown to earth.  Well, many many beers later, when the
    game ended, I ended the night feeling as though SOMETHING went right.
    
    I dunno whether they cain play at that level nexted week, given the
    tendency to let down after beating a good team like that, but IF, and
    that's a big IF they can, the Oilscum will be toast.
    
    Twas a decent evening after all fer me.
    
    JaKe
    
40.822Love to see the Faiders get their Butts kickedQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 26 1992 19:419
     I love it !!!  another brilliant move by Al "The Mobster" Davis.
    TM is a Bum...  He'll be another Tony Eason or  Marc Wilson...
    Mark My words...  BTW  Look for Al Baby to start to put the heat on Art
    Schell...  One more season like this one and you can stick a fork in
    Art,  cause he's all done.
    
    BG
    
    
40.823NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 26 1992 19:5317
    
    I wouldn't be so much concerned by Todd Marinovich's lack of
    experience and uninspired play to date as much as the fact that the kid
    is a gamble, a longshot.  When he came out of college he was not
    tremendously regarded, like an Aikman or a Jeff George.  I think the
    only reason he's more well known to the average fan than other young, 
    developing QBs and backup QBs all over the league is the Robo-QB thing,
    and the ridiculous notion that he is somehow better off because he fits 
    the Raiders' rebel/reclamation project image.  The fact is that he
    doesn't have a tremendously strong arm and even at USC he wasn't known
    for playing smart...
    
    I think if the Raiders have a chance to draft a talented QB in the near
    future they won't think twice on Todd's account.
    
    glenn
    
40.824Give him Time!SALEM::HARRIS_KMon Oct 26 1992 21:2616
    I agree with Carlos, back off Marinovich. He is gonna make bad plays!
    I still feel that thier play calling is suspect at best, run, run
    pass!! It seems that every game the running game dies in the second
    half. Marinovich is then forced to pass and teams are just teeing off
    on him. Remember, Wright, Montoya, Wisnewski, and Mosebar have been
    banged up all year. Marinovich will get better. I don't see Nagel or
    Farve lighting up the score board for thier respective teams!
    
    Schroeder has proven that he is to inconsistent to be the starter so
    what have you got to lose by starting Marinovich?? The QB is always the
    guy to take the blame. 
    
    On the positive side, Aarron Wallace and Anthony Smith are looking
    pretty solid. Anthony Bell is making progress. Where is McGlockton???
    
    Kenn
40.825DECWET::METZGERMon Oct 26 1992 21:329

Dump dickerson..play Nick Bell...The guy tops 100 yards against the
chickenhawks and then gets 2 carries the next week...Hello..McShell..
hello..hello...

What a goof...

Metz
40.826Play Vince Evans..............NOT!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Tue Oct 27 1992 13:378
    
    
         I hope your right Glen. Cuz this guy is not the answer. the only
    problem I see is there aren't too many promising NFL type QB's coming
    out this year.
    
    Chappy
    
40.827QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 27 1992 14:145
    
     Play St. Marys girls team...  the faiders should be able to pull
    that one out even with TM at the helm !!  ;^)
    
    BG
40.828Jury's still out for another year or two on TM!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Oct 27 1992 15:5514
40.829The scenario opens with FREE AGENCYOURGNG::RIGGENDENVER JECKYL AND HYDESTue Oct 27 1992 16:2710
	Uncle Al takes a short flight up towards the bay area. He is planning 
a power lunch with the city of Oakland to build a new contract to move the 
silver & black back into the town. Things are going well the officials have well
greased pockets. 
	Suddenly in swaggers a man recognized by everyone JOE MONTANA, Uncle Al
splains that he has signed Joe as a free agent Joe is ready to play 2 years
and bring the silver and black into the Superbowl and teach young TOAD the 
skills needed. 

Jeff
40.830big helping?CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Oct 27 1992 16:3212
    
    Jeff,
    
    Been dippin into the 'sawmain's schrooms again?
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    available without a prescription
    
    Kev
    
40.831QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 27 1992 17:314
    Really not to far fetched...  Especially the part about Uncle Al
    greasing every palm in town to get what he wants.  
    
    BG
40.832USCTR1::NAHEARNTue Oct 27 1992 18:0010
    I think that Brett Favre is outplaying Marijuanavich by a W I D E
    margin!!!  There's really no comparison.......Favre was rated at 92.5
    going into last weekend and Marijuanavich was at 67.7!!
    
    I know that these QB ratings aren't an exact science, but 67.7 SUCKS!!!
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
40.833ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Oct 28 1992 15:2420
    Nelly's right, Favre is playing better than TM right now. Here's how TM
    measures up with some of the other QB's mentioned. This is current, but
    only includes stats and not QB ratings:
    
    Passing                        att cmp   pct  yds td int
    
    Favre, GB                      185 117  63.2 1285  6   3
    Marinovich, LA                 155  78  50.3 1077  5   6
    Nagle, NY                      186  94  50.5 1147  4   6
    George, Ind                    144  79  54.9  925  4   7
    Esiason, Cin                   166  92  55.4  870  5  10
    
    
    So, while TM isn't exactly re-writing the record books he is holding
    his own. And he's doing it with an ailing offensive line (as Kenn
    pointed out), and two less years of college experience. HtH
    
    Carloski
    
    
40.834Hope he goes off the wagon....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Wed Oct 28 1992 16:295
    
    
    
    
               He still Sips.....
40.835CSC32::SALZERThu Oct 29 1992 00:555
    Of course he sips but what else can they do right now?
    Their stuck. I hope Al continues to stick by his guns and
    keep Tod in there for at least another 5 years.  
    
    BoB
40.836ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 04 1992 13:4515
    The faids go up against the Randall-less eagles in Philly. Max Montoya
    will be back in the lineup for the faids which should be a help.
    Another thing that might help is if the faids take a page out of lasted
    weeks cowboy/eagle game. The cowboys were lining up FB Darrell Johnston
    alongside of Erik Williams, double teaming Clyde Simmons, and on the
    other side it was TE Novacek alongside Tuinei (sp?) double teaming
    Reggie White. It worked pretty effectively, Aikman was hardly pressured
    or sacked. The faider defense really needs to concentrate on stuffing
    Herschel, and getting to Jimmy Mac. One last thing, please get Nick
    Bell more involved. 
    
    Faids pull an upset - by 7.
    
    Carloski
    
40.837SALEM::HARRIS_KWed Nov 04 1992 15:397
    Carlos,
                 I can't agree more about getting Nick Bell the ball!!!!
    If the Raiders fall behind early, Philly will unleash their pass rush
    and it's gonna be a LONG day for TM. Hopefully Philly will keep Randall
    on the Bench all day!!!
    
    Kenn
40.838And I suppose Northwestern is gonna beat Michigan too...BSS::JCOTANCHWed Nov 04 1992 19:087
    
>    Faids pull an upset - by 7.
    
Just when I thought you were starting to get a little objective, Carlos...


Joe    
40.839Faiders lose by twice the spreadQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 04 1992 20:183
    Yea,  And Monkeys Might Fly Out Of My Butt, Too...
    
    BG
40.840ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 04 1992 21:0022
    Yeah well, I know they'll do a heck of a lot better than the doinks did
    up in philly.....what? didn't the doinks have a very impressive 3
    points...to phillys 30 (?)....hee heee...Besides, the birds are in
    major dis-array, ESPN reported that many eagles players are unhappy
    with management....benching Cunningham....a slumping offense....a week
    off for the faids....the return of Montoya to the line...all these
    things = eagles ripe for an upset!
    
    And since I'm making predictions....I'll go out a little further on the
    limb and say that the chargers are gonna win the chiefs, and the jets
    are gonna terrorize Bucky and the boys (by the way, did anybody else
    see the article in the USA Today about Bucky....made me wanna throw
    chunks)....:-)
    
    Also, not to kick a dead horse or anything (after lasted weeks
    discussions on TM and QB ratings) but, I notice in todays USA Today that
    Marinovich has a QB rating of 67.6, and is just under Bucky, and rated
    higher than Nagle, Esiason, George, and Stouffer (who went out on IR).
    
    
    Carlos
    
40.841Faiders will faid QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 04 1992 21:376
    Somebody slap Carlitos...  He's losing it in a big way !!
    
    ;^)
    
    BG
    
40.842WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Thu Nov 05 1992 13:163
    
    
    Marinovich Sips.....
40.843QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Nov 05 1992 19:313
    Just another Ankle-Bitting patsie
    
    BG
40.844ELMAGO::BENBACANew Mexico *IS* Part of the U.S.!Thu Nov 05 1992 22:216
    You all have to forgive Carlitos...you see he sits pretty close to a
    die hard Cowboys fan who took a lot of grief the last few years because
    of the Cowboys dismal record. However, they are doing rather well now
    and Mr Carlitos is now receiving lots of grief from this Cowboy fan
    that sits next to him. If you want I could ask her to kindly slap
    Carlitos for you guys. Might bring him to his senses :^)) 
40.845QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 06 1992 12:234
    
     Sounds good...  Make sure he knows it's from me !!
    
    BG
40.846So does Schroeder.......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Mon Nov 09 1992 12:535
    
    
    BTW
    
    Marinovich Sips...
40.847QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 09 1992 14:127
    
     HA !!!  And old Carlitos was predicting a possible Faiders win...
    Kinda looked like the Donks playing against the Beagles yesterday.
    the AFC don't stand a chance in the SB this year...  Hope Denver 
    decides to stay home !!
    
    BG
40.8483-6, but about to make a serious turn around....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Nov 09 1992 15:1318
40.849QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 09 1992 17:475
    Never Happen Carlitos...   
    
    Hey... I'm only 29 you dog !!  
    
    BG
40.850CSC32::SALZERTue Nov 10 1992 17:093
    Dickerson sips....
    
    BoB
40.851QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 10 1992 20:1614
    
    Todd Sips
    Uncle Al Sips
    Art Sips
    Howie Sips
    
    Etc.....
    
    The Faiders Sip in general !!!
    
    
    HTH
    
    BG
40.852GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Tue Nov 10 1992 20:434
    
    	Aw come on BG, Howie don't sip.
    
    Claybroon
40.853CSC32::SALZERTue Nov 10 1992 21:309
    Art doesn't sip but Al does. It's too bad that if they
    don't turn around Art will be out by the end of next year.
    The Raider org needs to finally wake up.  They need to 
    reorganize and get Al's hands off the day to day management
    and give the coach a free reign.  What use to work in
    the past does not work in today's environment. We at
    DEC know that as well as anyone.
    
    BoB
40.854You heard it here first...DECWET::METZGERHail to Bill and tCmTue Nov 10 1992 22:5214
My guess is that the raiders will end up signing Joe Montana for next year...

why?

The niners are doing to well with Young and have an adequate backup in Bono.
The Raiders know that Shredder isn't the answer and Moronovich is too green
to be any help right now if he'll ever be, Joe wants to stay on the left
coast too...

And the Raiders will have some extra cash after they dump Dickerson the bum
after this season...

Metz
40.855Montana could be another Plunkett for the RaidersQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 14:1215
    
     Metz,
    
     I was thinking the same thing on Monday night when they interviewed 
    Joe at half time.  I would be a great move for him...  Same area of 
    the country, don't have to uproot and move for half the year, etc...
    Montana would be a great 2-3 year QB while providing training to a
    young QB of the future.  I don't know that TM is that young QB though.
    The Raiders game would have to change to utilize Joe's skill set as
    well.  
    
    BG
    
    Ps.  I was mearly ~/~ with my lasted comments...  Howie would be
    welcome in Denver anytime if it were up to me !
40.856Surf's gonna be up in a year or two dudes...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 11 1992 14:2421
40.857Vince put your helmet on....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Wed Nov 11 1992 14:5416
    
    
    Marinovich Sips.
    
                Todd was reported saying yesterday that he was benched in
    favor of Jay for next weeks game(Hallelula sp.) cuz Marinovich Sips.
    
          Dickerson too should be benched cuz he sips most o the time in
    favor of Marcus with Bell as his backup.
    
              BG you can't be serious about Art, Al and Howie. Al Davis is
    one of the best owners/Pres. in Pro Sports. Art Shell is a good coach
    and ask any QB in the league about Howie.
    
          But BTW
                Marinovich Sips....
40.858QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 16:046
    Chap...  You got something against TM???  ;^)
    
     I am serious about Uncle Al...  He needs to let the coach run the
    team.
    
    BG
40.859Marinovich Sips........WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Wed Nov 11 1992 17:259
    
    
          BG   I do believe he does meddle a little too much but he has had
    great success the last 20 yrs with all his moves.. ie Plunkett, Marcus
    Allen as the 13th pick in the draft, Ronnie Lott, Howie from Villanova
    , Taking the Rocket in the late rds last year too might pan out for
    the Silver and Black. The Guy is a football genius.
    
           TM Who me???   :-)
40.860CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 11 1992 17:3612
    If you have been around as long as Al your bound to 
    make some good moves.  Every team has players accumulated
    that are tremendous deals and steals.  Don't forget the bad 
    moves either. He's in the HoF for past accomplishments.
    He has done little in recent years.
    TM sips
    Jay sips
    Al sips
    Marcus doesn't sip
    
    BoB
    
40.861BSS::JCOTANCHWed Nov 11 1992 17:487
    RE: Chap
    They said the same thing on Sportscenter, that the Raiders got the
    rights to Rocket with a low-round pick.  I thought they took him in the
    4th round.  
    
    
    Joe
40.862Theres always a 1st time...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Wed Nov 11 1992 17:568
    
    
           I thought it was an 8th rd pick, but I may be wrong.
    
           Marinovich Sips.
    
    
    Chappy
40.863H T H !!!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 18:1315
    I believe it was the 8th... 
    
     Don't get me wrong,  I'm not saying the Uncle Al didn't do some good
    things for the Raiders, He did (most of the sh*t A$$ed luck but thats
    besides the point.  Thats past history.  Uncle Al has done very little
    of late to inprove the Raiders the way he had in the past.  In FACK(tm),
    he done more to hurt in recent years.  The move to LA, The Hiring and
    Firing of Mike Shanahan,  The benching of Marcus,  The trade of Lachey
    for Shredder, the Drafting of TM, and the inability to get his friggen
    hands out of the day to day operations and let Art (or whom ever) run 
    the team like they were hired to do.  I'd be really pissed if my boss
    told me that I was accountable for a project and then insisted on
    getting in my way every time I mad a decision.
    
    BG
40.864PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 11 1992 18:172
    Yeah, the Rocket is racking up those punt returns and receiving yards
    for the Silver and Black these days isn't he.
40.865Tim Brown = Freeman McneilQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 18:286
    I know we've been down this road a million times but...  The rocket
    will see about as much action in the NFL as Tim Brown has since he's
    been in there.  Always Hurt...  Can't stand up to the punishment, a 
    girly mon..
    
    BG
40.866............. Sips (tm)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Wed Nov 11 1992 19:0216
    
    
       BG BG  BG BG BG BG BG BG BG BG BG
    Geez.
    
         Tim Brown
    
    20 catches team leader           Not too bad especially
    401 yds team leader              with a chump like (Marinovich Sips)
    4 td's team leader               throwing to him.   :-)
    
    10.4 yds per Punt return ( 4th in the AFC)
    
            This guy isn't no slouch or no Al Toon for that matter.
    
    Chappy...
40.867same fate awaits the rocket... probably worse !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 20:193
    And he was hurt all lasted(tm) year !!
    
    
40.868QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesWed Nov 11 1992 21:324
      I heard the rocket is doing to well in the CFL.  Is this true?  If
    so,  then this most likely means he would do less in the NFL.
    
    	Tim
40.869Why else would the Argo's want to dump him?DECWET::METZGERHail to Bill and tCmWed Nov 11 1992 21:5311
The rocket is a glorified kick returner in the CFL. Great speed but still hasn't
learned how to break off a route or fake anybody into thinking that he isn't
doing anything but going long...

He runs a reverse or two a game but that's about it....Tim Brown has it all
over this guy (and that isn't saying a whole heck of a lot).

His brother will be twice the player he is...

Metz
40.870NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Mon Nov 16 1992 13:204
    
    
               Now thats more like it Todd. Best game I ever seen you play.
     You are the man. After that you belong in the Pro Bowl.
40.871TM Sucks !!!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 15:429
    
    Can't wait for the Donks to kick the crap out of the Faiders.
    Shouldn't be tough...  After all, they are a sunset team much 
    like the Midgets of NJ.  Look for another impressive Denver 
    victory against the Faiders...  this will all but seal the Faids
    fate for the season... Cellar bound !!
    
    BG          GGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO  
    BBBBBRRRRROOONNNNCCCCCOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!
40.872Doesn't BBJ have such a friendly smile?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Nov 17 1992 16:2119
40.873KOD against KOD !!! QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 17:5024
    
    AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
    
     Mods...  Stop Carlitoski...  He's putting the KOD on the Mighty
    Broncos.  No fair...  Foul... Cheep-shot !!!  This is something
    right outa my nightmares.  
    
     KOD Back At Ya:
    
     Carlitos,  You are wrong.  There is know way the the Broncos could
    compete with such a manly team as the Raiders.  Their coach is the 
    best in the league and Uncle Al Davis is soley responsible for football
    being what it is today.  Todd M. is going to be a HOF'er.  Howie Long
    and Tim Brown are gods.  Shredder is best back up QB to ever play the
    game.  The Rocket is better than he would be just because the Raiders
    own his rights in the NFL.  No,  this Raider football team is the
    greatest bunch of guys to ever be assembeled into a team.  They are 
    truely art in motion on the playing field.  They deserver to go to the
    superbowl and will undoubtedly avenge their earlier loss to Denver 
    this comming week.  The Raiders are the best and... (here it comes, the
    KOD) can't possible lose to the Broncos at Home !!!   ;^)
    
    
    BG
40.874ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Nov 17 1992 19:2222
    
    Oh yeah....let's see....John Elway's teef are like the finest pearls
    (only bigger), and his wife (Margaret?), now there's a real Babe-raham
    Lincoln! The doinks offensive line has really looked impressive lately
    and they should have no problema running right over those senior
    citizens that the faids call a defensive line. And should BBJ not be
    able to play, I know that the other TM, (you know the good QB) should
    be able to come in and have a stellar performance against a weak faider
    secondary. Also, we can expect both Gaston Greene and Sammy Smith to
    have record breaking field days. Todd Marinovich or Shredder (whichever
    of the faids two helpless QB's) and the rest of the faider offense will
    struggle miserably against the mighty Orange Crush defense of the
    Broncos. Croel, Meck, Brooks and Fletcher will be terrors, and the
    faids will remain without a clue. And should any of these defenders
    falter, the executer himself, Steve Atwater will surely crush the
    faiders all alone if need be.....Dan Reeves is by far the best
    offensive play caller ever, and his schemes are pure brilliance. I
    doubt that a hundred of DEC's new Alpha architecture machines could be
    of any help in deciphering such complex game plans as Dan's. :-)
    
    Carloski
    
40.875QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 20:5711
    
     Oh Carlitos,  you couldn't be more wrong.  Denver doesn't stand a
    chance against the much more talented and wiser Raiders.  This team
    is legendary and will surely go down in history as one of the greatest
    ever assembled.  Elway on his best day will not be able to overcome
    the awsome defense of the Raiders.  Art Shell is 100 times the coach 
    that Danny Reeves will ever be.  No,  the Raiders can't possibly lose
    this game at home to the Broncos.  It's just not in the cards.  If
    I were you carlitos, I'd bet the farm !!
    
    
40.876CSC32::SALZERTue Nov 17 1992 22:1312
    Hey Carlos,
    
    WAKE UP! oh clueless one! :*). Jay can't carry Maddox's 
    jock strap. Todd would try but doesn't know what one 
    looks like.  Denver could put their 3rd string qb in and
    still have a big edge there. Remember these teams never
    split. It's always sweep sweep sweep and then it will be 
    weep weep weep down in Raiderland. The Broncos will have
    them crying in their bordeaux.  Is it true that standard
    Raider tailgate fare is quiche? 
    
    BoB
40.877CSC32::SALZERTue Nov 17 1992 22:141
    By the way Carlos, didja' get that elk this year?
40.878BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingWed Nov 18 1992 01:029
    
    I believe that in a traditional rivalry as this is, very little
    matters.  It usually is close and anything can happen.
    
    Speaking as a Charger fan..................go Raiders.  
    Speaking as the father of a Bronco fan.....go Broncos. (for my boy)
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
40.879WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsWed Nov 18 1992 12:2110
    
    
           Marinovich sips
           Denver Sips
    
           elway picks his teeth with a stick
    
           Raiders win by 10
    
       Chappy.
40.880Take It To The Bank... Arts a Loser and Al is a Crook !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 18 1992 12:286
    Chappy...
    
     It ain't nioce to talk about GAWD that way.  Elway Rools !!!
    Faiders lose by 17...
    
    BG
40.881BBJ & Maddox both HoF bound.....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 18 1992 12:3424
    Hey Carlos,
    
    WAKE UP! oh clueless one! :*). Jay can't carry Maddox's 
    jock strap. Todd would try but doesn't know what one 
    looks like.  Denver could put their 3rd string qb in and
    still have a big edge there. Remember these teams never
    split. It's always sweep sweep sweep and then it will be 
    weep weep weep down in Raiderland. The Broncos will have
    them crying in their bordeaux.  Is it true that standard
    Raider tailgate fare is quiche? 
    
    BoB
    
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    BoB, I couldn't agree more, the faids will be weeping after getting
    sweeped by the awesome Broncos (what a team), I also agree that Denvers
    3rd string QB (and entire 3rd string squad for that matter) are way too
    much for the hapless faids. 
    
    HtH :-)
    
    Carlitos
    
40.882Maybe nexted year....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 18 1992 12:388
40.883KOD!!! it's dirty job but....QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 18 1992 12:4311
    Agreed about the Elk....  I didn't even see one.  A little bit of
    sign but thats it.  
    
    Carloskiwitz,  No way Elway or Maddox are HOF'ers...  They'll have
    to beat out Shredder and Todd to get there and we know that will
    never happen.  The Raiders practice squad could beat the lowly
    Donkeys.  No,  this one is over, it's a mail for the Raiders.
    the absolutly no way they can lose this game to the Broncos at home,
    just can't happen. 
    
    BG  ;^)
40.884ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 18 1992 12:4610
40.885WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsWed Nov 18 1992 13:384
    
    
          Alright BG and Carlos. Reexchange your passwords and get out of
    each others accounts.
40.886BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingWed Nov 18 1992 18:4210
    
    Carlos, it wasn't my fault.  The media here in the Springs brain-washed
    him.  I attempted to show him the virtues of the mighty SuperChargers,
    but he flipped me off.  Oh me.....
    
    I must be doing something wrong, because my other son is a Dolphin fan.
    ;-)
    
    Glenn
    
40.887Donk fan since '74QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesThu Nov 19 1992 13:403
      I think I'm going to be sick!
    
      Tim
40.888Elway, Montana, Marino, Unitas, Namath, Staubach, Bradshw, Stabler......ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinThu Nov 19 1992 15:4121
    It's really very unfortunate that one of the greatest (if not thee
    greatest) QB's ever, might not play this weekend against the lowly
    Raiders. But fortunately for the awesome Bronco team, they have a very
    competent, and confident young QB in Tommy Maddox. And although he
    might share the same initials as the faiders young QB (TM) that is
    about as far as the comparisons go, Marinovich is way out-classed by
    Maddox, and they don't even belong in the same league, much less the
    same division. Many speculated that Marinovich was made from the same
    mold as Stabler, but I think it's more like the same mold as Marc
    Wilson......
    
    Dan Reeves again showed why he is a true football genious when he
    selected Maddox this year with a first round pick.....unlike that poor
    selection the faids wasted a #1 pick on lasted year. Yup! This weekend
    the wheat will be seperated from the chaff, and it will be the faids
    that are left blowing in the wind. Broncos win in a total blowout 54-3!
    
    HtH
    
    Carlitoswitz
     
40.889(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBWIll Hillary run the White House??Thu Nov 19 1992 15:5912
    

    >>It's really very unfortunate that one of the greatest (if not thee
    >>greatest) QB's ever, might not play this weekend against the lowly
    
    It's official, he's NOT playing against the Raiders
                                                        	
    Terry Bradshaw is staying in the CBS booth fer the weekend.
    
    
    JaKe
    
40.890And it sure the Hell wasn't me!!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsThu Nov 19 1992 17:018
    
    
           Carlos you also said in your little tribute ( -2 ) that many
    have compared Our TM to Stabler. I seem to recall that only one guy in
    here made that comparison.  :-)
    
    
    Chappy
40.891CSC32::SALZERThu Nov 19 1992 17:098
    I don't expect a blowout but Broncos as underdogs should
    cover and should win.  Most of the seats will be empty.
    Surfs up.  Who wants to watch a bunch of overgrown children
    beat each other up?  If they could only direct their energies
    to more productive and fullfilling endeavors.  
    Howie sips.
    
    BoB
40.892Are there any faiders that you do like, Chappy?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinThu Nov 19 1992 18:3017
40.893I think NOT.......:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsThu Nov 19 1992 19:174
    
    
    
            Hated Stabler!!!!!!!!!! Why you little (*&^%^%%
40.894PFSVAX::JACOBNewcastle Brown 'll sure smack ya downThu Nov 19 1992 19:185
    As a Steeler fan, I also hated Stabler, cause he was part of the
    *&(^ing Raiders, who all of us Steeler fans HATED immensely.
    
    JaKe
    
40.895Just WonderingWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsThu Nov 19 1992 19:289
    
    
         So Jake you probably thought the immaculate reception was legal
    too. :-)
    
    
    Chappy
    
    
40.896MKFSA::LONGlike 2 sparrows in a hurricane...Thu Nov 19 1992 19:337
	I don't know about JaKe, but it sure looked legal to me. 

	Certainly more legal than the Raider "roll the ball into the 
	end zone" trick.


	Bill
40.897PFSVAX::JACOBNewcastle Brown 'll sure smack ya downThu Nov 19 1992 19:3619
    
    >>     So Jake you probably thought the immaculate reception was legal
    >>too. :-)
    
    I think it was legal, Fuqua was running away from the ball, and the
    defender, cain't remember who, was flying towards the ball. Had it hit
    fuqua, it would have fallen pretty quick to the ground, but colliding
    with the defender, it went zinging BACKWARDS thru the air, til ol
    Franco happened to be in the right place at the right time,(Hey Ma,
    looky what I found) and tiptoed into the end zone.
    
    
    BTW, If I EVER see the tape of that again, I'm goin TO PUKE!!!!!!
    
    If I seen in once, I seen it a billion times, and I'm sick of it, just
    sick of it.
    
    JaKe
    
40.898BTW ah loved the 70's StillersCTHQ1::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Thu Nov 19 1992 19:435
    YOU'RE sick of it?
    Imagine if'n you was a Dolphin fan??
    
    MikeL
    
40.899WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsThu Nov 19 1992 19:4912
    
    
    
        With the defender hitting Fuqua at the exact same time the ball got
    there :-) The ballnaturally flew back towards Harris. And we all know
    there was a rule at the time about the ball couldn't touch two
    offensive players in succession or it was to be ruled incomplete.
    
            
                  Hate to be rehashing things from 14 yrs ago but......:-)
    
    Chappy
40.900Time flies, eh??CTHQ1::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Thu Nov 19 1992 19:538
    -1,
    14 years Chappy??
    
    Must be the memory cells gonzoed by Bud.
    Try close to *20* years ago.
    
    MikeL
    
40.901CSC32::SALZERThu Nov 19 1992 20:144
    Replay of the reception couldn't conclusively prove 
    anything. The play stands. TD! Raiders GO HOME!
    
    BoB 
40.902CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Nov 20 1992 11:598
But I'm sure you guys have heard the NFL Films interviews.

One of the interviews (with Madden???) talks about the ref running to the
phone, asking the cops how many police they'll have to escort them out,
and when they find out not many, the ref runs back on the field
and signals TD.  8^)

'Saw
40.903Zebras really did give it to themQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 13:213
    True Story... !!!  The one time anything has gone against the 
    Raiders.  BTW the "Reception" was illiggle !!!  Raider should
    have won the game.
40.904I hate when that happens......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsFri Nov 20 1992 14:538
    
    
    
              Yeah Saw I saw that NFL Films Clip and it made me more irate
    than ever. Was 1t 20 yrs ago? Wow those Navy years are still a daze I
    guess I missed 5 yrs.:-)
    
    Chappy
40.905CSC32::J_HERNANDEZFri Nov 20 1992 16:172
    The Raiders were happy as hell to lose that game, that way they didn't
    have to face the fish. 
40.906QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 16:253
    The raiders woulda ended the streak...  Unlike the sorry Squeelers
    
    BG
40.907Just A Little ConfusedRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Nov 20 1992 17:426
    Im confused, does the reply CLEARLY SHOW WITHOUT A DOUBT that the 
    defensive player did not touch the ball.  Ive seen the reply but
    Ive never slowed it down and went frame to frame with the old VCR
    button to see who touched it and everything.  Thanks in advance.
    
    							MaB
40.908QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 19:236
    I've seen it several hundered times (ok, maybe 20 or 30) and
    it looks to me that he never did.  I would be interesting to
    run that tape by the IR guys of today and see if they would have
    over turned (I know the rule is changed)
    
    BG
40.909ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Sat Nov 21 1992 21:075
    IR probably woul have upheld the call since they would not have clear
    evidence to overrule.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
40.910Howie Rules.........WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsMon Nov 23 1992 12:0819
    
    
        Just a few thoughts from yesterdays game.........
    
            Marinovich played another great game thats 2 in a row :^)
    
    
           All TM's Sip.
    
                Donks Sip.
    
                Marcus Allen is God..........Even Though Uncle Al doesn;'t
    know it.
    
              Marcus Allen Best 3rd string Back in football??????
    
                Denver worst 7-4 team in Football....
    
    Chappy
40.911ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Nov 23 1992 15:0123
    Raiders defense comes up big again! Terry McDaniel had a great game,
    picking off TM-jr. twice, and on both of the returns he only had Maddox
    to beat to get into the endzone but was unable to come up with a score
    on either return. Also, as Chappy said, Howie tore it up.....
    and Chester McGlokton, the faids #1 draft pick finally got his first
    NFL sack, hopefully he'll become like a wolf that's gotten it's first
    taste of blood. On offense, Shredder didn't pull his patented choke
    routine. Dickerson had his first 100+ game for the faids....most of it
    in the firsted half, and Marcus unbelieveably, was allowed to play and
    got an easy TD when the doinks blitzed and left Allen all alone in the
    right side of the secondary. (IMHO) Marcus needs to get the ball way
    more often! Marinovich hung ten on the bench for the second week in a
    row...which might be good for him. The Raiders still have a slim chance
    of making it to the playoffs, and they might even be able to sneak away
    with the Division title, although I highly doubt they'll be able to do
    the latter. The way I see things shaping up now, the Division belongs
    to the Chiefs, with the doinks, chargers, and faids going after two of
    the three wildcard spots (Miami will have one...and now that Moon's out,
    I don't see anybody in the Central getting a wildcard spot). So, 9-7
    just might be good enuf for the faids to be in the running.
    
    Carloski
    
40.912Getting down to the Nitty Gritty (Sea was eliminated)RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 23 1992 16:0811
    They can(will) hold the last Playoff spot with a win this week, of
    course they need Detroit to wake up and beat Houston.  IF they beat
    SD they are both at .500 but LA gets the Tie break with SD so if
    Houston loses to Det and goes to .500 (I believe) LA has the tie over
    houston as well, of couse Cleveland could get to .500 as well but again
    it looks like LA has the tie over them.  Have the Raiders lost to
    either Houston or Cleveland this year ?????  I dont think Houston is
    going anywhere this year and wouldnt mind seeing The Raiders in there
    instead of the Oilers.
    
    								MaB
40.913Go Raiders -TM cuz he sips.......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsMon Nov 23 1992 17:0117
    
    
    
              Raiders lost to the browns(whatta lame team to lose to.)
    
           The Raiders have.
         @SD, KC, @MIA, SD and @Was.....
    
           The only game they can afford to lose is Was. If they beat SD
    twice and beat Mia. That would go along way to help eliminate some of
    the enemy...:-).
    
               I see them beating Miami (We always beat Miami on Monday
    Night). Plus SD at least once, but that KC game is the make or Break
    game.
    Chappy
    
40.914QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 23 1992 17:194
    Where is my bird...  burnt please...  Just like the donks !
    
    
    BG
40.915QUASER::JACKSONTABG + Carlos=KOD nauseaMon Nov 23 1992 19:262
      The faids win a game and now your talking playoffs?  Please wait
    another 2-3 weeks....
40.916not enough ballsCSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketMon Nov 23 1992 19:4814
The best part of yesterday's game came before the kickoff.  NBC was
interviewing several of the Raiders, mostly about the poor showing
that had made so far.  Tim Brown had a really super quote.  It was
something like this.


"I think that we're a team with too many players and not enough
balls."

He was talking about all the running backs on the team and not having
a set starter.  And I'm pretty sure that he meant [foot]balls.  Regardless,
it was truly a quote worth remembering.

Jerry
40.917exQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 23 1992 21:104
    
     I'd bet that it's more like Balls knowing Brown
    
    BG
40.918It's not nice to mess with Uncle Al!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Nov 24 1992 13:378
    Here's some good news for old Chappy, the faids demoted Marinovich to
    the practice squad and made Vince Evans the #2 guy behind Shredder. 
    You think maybe Marinovich voiced his dis-satisfaction to Uncle Al,
    about not being the starter...maybe...? This might turn into another
    Beuerlein -vs- Davis = Beuerlein gone!  type of thing.
    
    Carloski
    
40.919QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Nov 24 1992 15:195
     
     Another exibition of Uncle Al getting his fingers in where they 
    don't belong.  
    
    BG
40.920CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 25 1992 01:557
    Don't get excited Raider fans. You all know as well as anywone
    that Dever has an uncanny ability to make mediocre teams look
    like gang busters on any given occasion.  Also, it should be 
    noted that both Schroeder and Dickerson seem to have career days
    against the Broncos.  You can look it up. 
    
    BoB 
40.921Home for the holidaysBSS::JCOTANCHWed Nov 25 1992 13:086
    I'll be very surprised if LA can make the playoffs.  Their games left
    are San Diego twice, KC, at Washington and at Miami.  At best I think
    they'll finish 8-8, but even 9-7 probably wouldn't get them in.
    
    
    Joe
40.922ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 25 1992 13:3316
    Re. last two...While it might be true that the faids hopes of reaching
    the playoffs is a long shot, it's also true that the huge victory over
    the doinks this lasted weekend helped their chances immensely. If the
    doinks could've won, they'd be four games up on the faids, two on the
    chargers, and one on the chiefs, but as it stands they are only two up
    on the faids, one on the chargers, and tied wif da chiefs. Not to
    mention that the doinks still have to play Dallas, Buffalo, and K.C.,
    plus two games against the struggling Seahawks. So, while the faids
    might be home for the holidays, I think they that because of lasted
    weekends mauling, they've pretty much insured that their buddies (the
    doinks) will be joining them. HtH   :-)
    
    Carloski
    
       PS  Look for the Seahawks to get their second win of the season on
    MNF!
40.923Marinovich Sips.....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsWed Nov 25 1992 16:386
    
    
           Yes TM third stringer......HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA...
    
    
    Chappy...
40.924One step forward, two steps back!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 25 1992 19:0113
40.925Wait 'til nexted Year....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Nov 30 1992 13:3316
    I don't care what Chappy thinks.....SHREDDER SIPS !, way more than TM.
    
    Shredder has like eight or so more years of NFL experience, and
    Marinovich still looks better out there than Shred-head. Grampa Evans
    wasn't overly impressive either, and that, against a Charger team that
    was already in cruise control cause they had the game won easily.
    
    For all intents and purposes, this season is over with. So I say put TM
    back in and let him get some more OJT. That goes for Nick Bell,
    Skrepenak, and McGlokton as well. By the way, the faids do have a very,
    very small chance of getting in now, but they'd have to win the rest of
    their games (not an easy task) and then hope for a lot of help from
    some of the other teams.....
    
    Carloski
    
40.926BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 30 1992 13:458
    ND won't win the national title and the Raiders will miss the playoffs. 
    What more could one ask for?
    
    
    Joe
    
    PS - Since we feel so bad for the Raiders, all us Bronco fans will pull
    for them this week.  Go Raiders!  
40.927ELMAGO::CGRIEGOO'DowncastSoul,PutYourHopeInGod!Tue Dec 01 1992 16:1829
40.928BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 01 1992 18:2218
    
>    * Can the faids beat K.C. at home this weekend? Hmmm?
>    * Can the faids beat Miami on MNF in two weeks? Hmmm?
>    * Can the faids beat San Diego at home in three weeks? Hmmm?
    
I'll agree.  My answer to each of these questions would also be yes - but asked
on an individual basis.  Now if you asked me if the Faids will win their next 3 
games, I would say no.  I'd count the game at RFK as a loss, so I don't think
they'll go any better than 8-8.  

As for Denver, after last night's loss I think they'll finish 9-7.  Now whether
or not that'll get them in the playoffs depends on what the other contenders do
the rest of the way, but right now I would say 9-7 won't get them in the
playoffs.  


Joe
    
40.929QUASER::JACKSONTAReeves and play calling don't mixTue Dec 01 1992 20:064
      The Cheifs and bolts are the only teams from the AFc west that
    deserve playoff spots.
    
    	Tim
40.930ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Dec 07 1992 13:4815
    Right On! The Ray-dahs come up with a huge victory, and keep their 
    slim shot playoff hopes alive. The Raider defense held the powerful
    running game of the Chiefs to 17 yards. Shredder had 3 td's, 2 inty's,
    and a grand total of 93 yards (he still sips). The Raiders also rushed
    for over 150 yards against the chiefs with Dickerson leading the way
    with 77 yds, Allen 37 yds, Shredder 21 yds, and Bell with 19 yds. Also,
    Art Shell got his first win against the Chiefs. Previous to this game
    the chiefs had beaten the faids 6 times in a row, so it's been a long
    time in coming but it tastes sweet now.
    
    Next up, Are you ready for some football....A Monday night party....
    it's the Ray-dahs against the fish nexted week on MNF.
    
    Carloski
    
40.931Maybe theyll finally trade Marcus so he can playRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Dec 07 1992 19:317
    Raiders can actually stay in the Hunt if the Beat Miami this coming
    weekend.  I think even Cleveland fans will be rooting for the Raiders
    they can help out some other teams by beating Miami this week.  Will
    be a very intresting weekend.
    								MaB
    
    I still like watching Dickerson run
40.932Kings of MNFELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Thu Dec 10 1992 15:1214
40.933time released capsuleELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Fri Dec 11 1992 12:0955
    Here's a capsule of the coming up faids/fish game that I took off the
    internet:
    
                              Monday, Dec. 14
                        LA Raiders (6-7) at Miami (8-5)
            Favorite -- Miami by 6.
            Turf -- Natural.
            Rankings -- 18th on offense, 9th rushing, 23rd passing. 8th on
    defense, 12th rushing, 6th passing. Miami: 4th on offense, 24th
    rushing,
    1st passing. 14th on defense, 6th rushing, 21st passing.
    
            Raiders -- Los Angeles has probably made its move too late, but
    the
    Raiders have won three of their last four and Jay Schroeder is coming
    off his third three-touchdown game of the season. RB Eric Dickerson has
    begun to contribute more and in five of their last eight games, the
    Raiders have allowed less than 10 points. Now Los Angeles has to figure
    out how to get off to a better start. Two brutal losses to start the
    season against Denver and Cincinnati will likely com back to haunt the
    Raiders.     
    
            Dolphins -- Miami has dropped five of its last seven after a
    6-0 start
    and the playoffs are no longer a certainty. The Dolphins have scored
    only two offensive touchdowns in their last 14 quarters and managed
    just
    40 rushing yards against San Francisco last week. Miami has the kind of
    schedule a team would want down the stretch (the Raiders, Jets and
    Patriots). But the Dolphins still have to win. QB Dan Marino leads the
    NFL with 22 TD passes. K Pete Stoyanovich leads the NFL with 99 points.
    He is seeking his third straight 100-point season.
    
            Keys to the Game -- Miami is under pressure and despite having
    Dan
    Marino's arm, the Dolphins must put together some sort of running
    attack
    against the Raiders. Los Angeles allowed 17 rushing yards against
    Kansas
    City a week ago. Without a balanced attack, the Dolphins' once secure
    playoff spot could crumble away.
            Head-to-head -- Raiders lead 16-4-1. They won two years ago in
    Miami,
    13-10.
            Streaks -- Los Angeles has won seven of its last eight meetings
    with
    Miami. The Raiders have won only one road game this season.
    
    
    Sorry about the cut & paste job....
    
    Carloski
    
    
    
40.934Hoot.....QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterFri Dec 11 1992 20:4639
    Hot off the persses For Sunday's Games !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    BG
    
    
Associated Press Mon 15-DEC-1986 13:58                   FBC--Raider firings
URGENT -- updates moving for PMs. Art Schell fired;
virtual unknown takes over

      LOS ANGELES (AP) - In a move that may go down as unparalled in
professionl football management, Al Davis announced today that Art Schell
has been fired as head coach of the Los Angeles Raiders, and has been
replaced by a virtual unknown to finish the season.
       Davis, managing general partner, announced at an impromptu new
conference this morning, that Schell, 53, was out immediately and
being replaced by Dave "Hoot" Gibson, 31, of Colorado Springs.
       Schell had been the Raider coach for the past 3 seasons and
had compiled a less than spectacular record in the span.
        A quick check by AP Sports could not uncover any professional
experience compiled by Mr. Gibson or his new assistant coach, Thomas
"Parott" Montgomery, 29, also of Colorado Springs.
        In making the announcement, Davis said Schell had "just not made
the correct decisions" and was at odds with Raider upper management on the
Quarter Back situation. Schell could not be reached for comment.
        Gibson, after being introduced, made a brief statement to the
press stating the Raiders' goals for the remainder of the season. 
        "While we all thank Art Schell for his outstanding contribution 
to the Raider's success," said Gibson, "...no more Zebras are going to
screw us out of victories."
        Gibson cited six of the Raiders' losses this year as being
blown by officials. He also cited Todd Marinovich, the much maligned backup
quarterback of the Raiders, as being instrumental in the present situation
of the Raiders being nearly eliminated from post-season play.
        The Raiders Play the Miami Dolphins this weekend in what could be
    a season ending game.
    
    
    
    
40.935QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksFri Dec 11 1992 20:471
      The fish will find a way to choke
40.936Hoot would make a great puppet...er I mean coach!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Sat Dec 12 1992 12:2610
    Re .934
    
    Haaa haa! Good one BG, I think old Hooter & the Parrott woulda loved
    it, although the part about the faids getting burned by the zebras on
    more than one occassion this year was more troof than exageration.
    (sp?)
    
    CG
    
    
40.937QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksMon Dec 14 1992 12:271
      RE-1 Zebras,  And so has all the other teams
40.938Blowout in Miami....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Dec 14 1992 16:269
    In view of the Oilers, donks, browns all losing this weekend, I predict
    a huge victory for the faids tonite over the dolphins. Howie will be
    smiling like an alley cat devouring rotting fish from a trashcan. 
    
    Faids 34
    fish  10
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
40.939WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYMon Dec 14 1992 16:3810
    
    
    
            Yes Raiders win and will be 1 game back of both Hou and Miami.
    We gotta finish ahead of Clev though because they beat us Head to head.
    
             SD at home next week will be tough. Than into RFK. Hopefully
    they'll be clinched by then so they'll coast.
    
    Chappy.
40.940QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksMon Dec 14 1992 20:315
      Graspin there aren't ya Carlos?
    
      Better check to see which note # the crow cafe is in.....
    
     Tim
40.941Wait 'til nexted year....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Tue Dec 15 1992 11:2317
    Well....I guess it was a wee bit of a grasp....the faids lose a close
    one in Miami...:-)
    
    Hey Chappy....SHREDDER SUCKS!
    
    I shoulda known better than to get my hopes up, just like I shoulda
    known Shredder would wait 'til he was on prime-time national
    telly-vision to pull his patented Shredder choke hold on Miami.
    The best thing I can say is that at least when TM chokes it's cause
    he's still green.....I hope uncle Art wakes up and puts TM back in now
    that Shredder's officially ended the season for the faids.
    
    Tim...which way'd you say that there crow cafe note is at?
    
    Carloski
    
    
40.942Hexed you own team....QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksTue Dec 15 1992 12:544
        You need directions to the cafe?  Can't you smell that bird just a
    cookin'????
    
      Tim
40.943Marcus Allen's Comments?CSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketTue Dec 15 1992 14:206
Gee, I figured that someone would have something to say about Marcus
Allen's comments.  He really slammed Al Davis, and accused him of
preventing him from making a living (loosely paraphrased), or something
similar.  Are the L.A. papers picking up on this?

Jerry
40.944QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksTue Dec 15 1992 15:036
      I saw that clip on him last night,  and I can't say I'm suprised.
    
      Alot of team would like Marcus on their team.  He just might get his
    wish before next season, if he doesn't call it quits.
    
     Tim
40.945Al's Been Jerkin' Marcus Around for YearsPISMO::PUGHTue Dec 15 1992 17:0413
Yes, the LA Papers are all over this story this morning (headlines as big as
the game story), but to those who know Marcus, this is no surprise.  The only
surprise is why it took him so long to officially go public.

Marcus Allen was the best high school football player I ever saw.  And he 
ain't been too bad in college (read Heismann) or the pros either.  Uncle Al
is crazy for not using him.  But then, being a Charger fan I'm glad he isn't
cuz otherwise the faiders would be playoff bound.

You Raider fans ought to start a discussion of whether Al has lost his so
called magic touch.

Doug
40.946#1 Raider in my Book........WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYTue Dec 15 1992 17:5512
    
    
    
             I am a big fan of Marcus Allen and I too believe he is getting
    the shaft from AL. But it is real hard saying anything to hard about
    Uncle AL cuz he is the Architect of the greatest Sports franchise in
    history, but in this case I believe he is dead wrong.
    
          I wish Marcus luck. He would be a great acquisition to any team
    he goes too next year.
    
    Chappy
40.947ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 18:006
    re: .946
    
    Amazing a Yankee fan with some objectivity :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
40.948MKFSA::LONGTue Dec 15 1992 18:028
>>    But it is real hard saying anything to hard about
>>    Uncle AL cuz he is the Architect of the greatest Sports franchise in
>>    history,

	Easy does it, Chappy.  You're beginning to sound like Hal!

	Bill
40.949DOoOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOpWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYTue Dec 15 1992 18:246
    
    Re Bill  UGHHHHHHH thems are fighting words..:-)
    
    Re TCM  Ah go by Tanana's 93 Baseball card...:-0
    
    Chappy
40.950FDCV07::KINGBe nice, I'm a Pheresis donor...........Tue Dec 15 1992 18:287
    
    Hmm.. Has any one EVER seen Chappy and Hal in the same room?????

    REK

    Me thinks the Celts would BURY the faiders as far as the dynasty
    goes...
40.951METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 18:334
I may be wrong but I think both REK and Hal were at the get together at OPP 
when Hawk, Doc, Dinz were leaving.

The Crazy Met
40.952PYWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYTue Dec 15 1992 18:406
    
    
    REK, check out the Winning Pct's. Raiders Still lead overall. And
    numbers don't lie. :-)
    
    Chap
40.953Get a clue chappy!FDCV07::KINGBe nice, I'm a Pheresis donor...........Tue Dec 15 1992 18:477
    Hey Chappy, check out the championship record betweed the teo clubs..
    
    Celts have won 35% of NBA, what have the Faiders done? 
    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
    
    
    REK
40.954Clueless **&&^&%^$%$# :-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYTue Dec 15 1992 18:5912
    
    
         Even Though I am a Celtic fan I'll prove i can pis$ as far as you.
    
       How many Championships for the Celts??? 16
    
                Yankees  22   So REK does this mean YOU think the Yankees
    are the best Franchise of all time????
    
                A Red Sox fan talking about clues. Huh. Get a 74 year clue
    pick another team!!!!!
    
40.955FDCV07::KINGBe nice, I'm a Pheresis donor...........Tue Dec 15 1992 19:026
    Chappy, 22 in what 90 years??? And NOBODY worth anything wants to play
    in NY now..  HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
    
    REK
    
    PS CHappy, I thought we were talking about the FAIDERS!!!!!!
40.956METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 19:074
REK amend .955 to play for the Yankees and we may be in agreement ...
oh no not that :-)

The Crazy Met
40.957Uncle Al > LOU GormanWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYTue Dec 15 1992 19:2914
    
    
    
                It's been said earlier By me. But yup the Sox and Mets
    really got lines of Free agents just waiting to sign Huh.
    
         Unless your over 35 of Course.
    
                 Back to the Raiders. They have won 3 out of 4 SB's they
    have been in and there overall Winning Percentage is # 1 in Pro Sports.
    
                I am not saying dynasty just stating the facts Mams.
    
    Chappy....
40.958METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 19:3314
Guess some folks don't deal with facts and reality. Mets dod not pursue
free agents this year. In years where they have done so they got who
they wanted (ie Coleman, Bonilla, Murray). Some were good signing, some
were not, but the Mets did not need to offer a heap more money than
the other teams. The Yankees did pursue free agents this year. They paid
more for Key than they might have had to if they were not the Yankees,
offered more to Maddux than the Braves, and had an offer to Bonds that was
comparable to what he got from SF. They are the only team that seems to worry
that agents are using them as a bargaining chip; a real indication that they
themselves believe that they are at a disadvantage.

Not sure what the Yankees have to do in the Raiders note :-)

The Crazy Met
40.959Great or very good != DynastyMETSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 19:377
Raiders have been very good for many years, but hardly qualify as 
a dynasty. True dynasties in footbal would be the Packers in the mid 1960's,
the Steelers in the mid-late 1970's and the 49ers in the 1980's.
Teams that might be considered great but not quite dynasties would be the 
Raiders in the early 1980's, Miami's 3 straight SB appearances.

The Crazy Met
40.960Most successful ever????CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Tue Dec 15 1992 19:4112
40.961but it DID take 4CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Dec 15 1992 23:3218
    
    
    A ways back, some rude comment was uttered about "Shredder Stinks"
    and I feel I must make a comment!
    
    
    
    
    Of course he does, Da ninja turtles and da rat tossed him into a
    garbage truck!  Doncha remember???????
    
    IMO, anybody who gets tossed (can I say that here?) into a garbage
    truck HAS GOT to stink - and bigtime too!
    
    I remain,
    Kev_for_Emily Latella!
    
    
40.962Even after this mediocre season, they're still the winningest.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Wed Dec 16 1992 11:2318
40.963Ninj, where are ya?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Wed Dec 16 1992 12:088
Once again, not having the statistics available, I hardly think that three 
champeenships in thirty years matches the records of the Bears or Packers.  
Hell the Packers have won five (I think) champeenships in those same years!
(I think the Pack won in 1961, 1962, 1966, and 1967.)

Once again, I like the Raiders, but the greatest franchise ever?  Hardly.

=Bob=
40.964WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYWed Dec 16 1992 12:307
    
    
           Bob, The numbers don't lie. The Raiders Winning Pct. was at
    57% the last time I saw it. NO OTHER team had a better winning PCT.
    I believe the Celts were second. 
    
    Chap
40.965CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Wed Dec 16 1992 12:3714
What we have here is a falture to communicate.

The prevailing sentiment in this file is that success is measured not by GAMES
won, but by CHAMPEENSHIPS won.  That is why the consensus is that the 
"legendary" Dean Smif is not the greatest coach ever, but a choke artist.

Following that logic, the Raiders are a good team, since in 30 years, they have 
won three times as many chapmeenships as Dean.  They are not, however, the most 
successful team, even in football, even in the thirty years of their existance.

I'll say it again.  The Raiders are a great team/franchise, but the greatest 
ever, hardly.

=Bob=
40.966ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Wed Dec 16 1992 12:5826
40.967CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Wed Dec 16 1992 13:2639
40.968CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Dec 16 1992 13:3114
Packers won 2 Super Bowls -- 1967, 1968

Packers won 8 NFL Championships -- 1936, 1939, 1944, 1961, 1962, 1965, 1966,
                                   1967


Packers played in 10 NFL Championship Games, losing in 1938, 1960




hth,
'Saw

40.969Kenny Stabler overated?? (&*&*^%&^$%$%%^$$%WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYWed Dec 16 1992 13:408
    
    
    3 out of 30   10%
    8 out of 100  Umm uh um um 8%
    
           Wheres your logic Bob?
    
    Chappy
40.970CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Dec 16 1992 13:5215
Oakland Raiders played in 3  AFL Championships -- 1967, 1968, 1969.

Oakland Raiders won 1 AFL Championship -- 1967

Oakland Raiders played in 4  Super Bowls -- 1968, 1977, 1981, 1984


Oakland Raiders won 3 Super Bowls -- 1977, 1981, 1984



(Oakland also counts LA Raiders too)


'Saw
40.971Lotsa 8^) here...CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Wed Dec 16 1992 14:0332
40.972CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Dec 16 1992 15:209
I think in terms of overall winning pct, the Raiders are the most
successful team in the last 30 years.

Which almost turns this into an ACC type debate, where you're stacking
winning pct on one side, versus Championship on the other....


Interesting.....
'Saw
40.973Raiders still better, IMHO!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Wed Dec 16 1992 15:2223
    Ok...another way of looking at it:
    
    I'm not sure how long the Pack has been around, but assuming they've
    been around 70 years, and the faids have been around 30 years, then:
    
    *the pack has played in 11 championship games in 70 years, so then,
     out of 70 possible chapionship games the Pack has played in ~15%, 
     and they've won 9 championships out of a possible 70, giving them 
     ~12%.
    
    *the faids have played in 7 championship games in 30 years, so then,
     out of a possible 30 championship games they've played in ~23%, 
     and they've won 4 championships out of 30 giving them ~13%.
    
    It should also be mentioned that before the merger of the AFL & NFL,
    there were fewer teams in each league to compete against, thus making
    it easier for teams to win championships. And with this in mind, the
    Pack was in the old NFL for at least 40 years, while the faids were in
    the AFL for ~8 years before the merger, so all things considered the
    Pack should have even more championships then they do. HtH
    
    Carloski
    
40.974QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksWed Dec 16 1992 15:581
      Please apply for yur marriage license down the hal ^))))))
40.975CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Dec 16 1992 16:0634
>    *the pack has played in 11 championship games in 70 years, so then,
>     out of 70 possible chapionship games the Pack has played in ~15%, 
>     and they've won 9 championships out of a possible 70, giving them 
>     ~12%.

Actually, after the merger of the two leagues, there is some interpretation
involved in determining the "championship".  Today, the NFC and AFC
championship games "equate" to the old NFL and AFL championships.
    

>    It should also be mentioned that before the merger of the AFL & NFL,
>    there were fewer teams in each league to compete against, thus making
>    it easier for teams to win championships. And with this in mind, the
>    Pack was in the old NFL for at least 40 years, while the faids were in
>    the AFL for ~8 years before the merger, so all things considered the
>    Pack should have even more championships then they do. HtH
    
Here are the figures from 1933 through 1969 

Chicago   	 9 played, 6 won
Detroit   	 5 played, 4 won
Green Bay 	10 played, 8 won
Cleveland/LA     5 played, 2 won
NY Giants       14 played, 3 won
Washington       5 played, 2 won
Philly		 4 played, 3 won
Clevland Browns  9 played, 4 won


That's a pretty fair representation......


'Saw

40.976The Pack Is Back !!! The Raiders are finished !QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterWed Dec 16 1992 21:3210
    Well,
    
     If that thats the case then the Broncos have won 4 `ships...  ;^)
    
     Seriously,  you can not equate the great Packers to the upstart 
    Faiders.  The Packers are by far the greatest football franchise 
    ever with the Bear right behid them.  Take the Stats and push `em.
    Tradition is what counts !!
    
    BG
40.977ImOWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYThu Dec 17 1992 11:5212
    
    
           You also can't equate any Pro teams success to a College teams 
    Success. Snuffy plays 40% of his games each year to inferior
    talent...ie. Georgia Southern, Fla A&M.....etc. While Pro teams play
    pro teams week after week.
    
            Bottom line is no the Raiders have not won the most
    Championships. But they do have the highest Winning Pct's in Pro
    Sports.
    
    Chappy
40.978See, the donks have something to be proud of too!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Thu Dec 17 1992 14:1713
40.979QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 17 1992 15:512
      Thats funny,  I didn't know Marcus Allen, Eric Bickerson, Jay Shrader
    and Toad Maranovich played for the broncos..... 
40.980ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Dec 28 1992 15:5518
    The faids ended their season, on a very positive note on Saturday, with
    an outstanding last second come from behind victory over the Redskins
    in D.C.. Shredder's still sipping (Chappy...) as usual, which is why he
    was pulled in the second quarter, in favor of grampa Evans, who came
    out and did a terrific job for the faids. Nick Bell also had a great
    day at starting RB. They shoulda been using both these guys all season.
    The Redskins needed a win to secure a playoff spot, but as it turned
    out they're in anyhow cause the Pack lost to the Vikings. The Raider
    defense played brilliantly too. 
    
    In other faider news, there's speculation that Art Shell might be
    unemployed pretty soon....and might possibly be replaced by the faiders
    QB coach Mike White. I personally don't think it'll happen, but then
    again it might be a welcome change.....Shell is to passive on the side
    lines, they need somebody more like Madden used to be. 
    
    Carloski
    
40.981BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 29 1992 13:215
    I think it would be a huge mistake for the Faids to get rid of Shell. 
    He's the perfect coach for the Raiders IMO.
    
    
    Joe
40.982faiders stink and HOOTSIE owes me $20.00QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 17:4019
     Uncle Al might as well fire Art and walk the side lines himself
    with his stupid sunglasses and his mafia hair style.  I mean what
    the hecks the difference any HOOT...  He's running the whole $%^&*^$%
    show anyway (and right into the dirt I might add).  At any rate,
    I've once again won my standing bet with Uncle Hootsie that the 
    Donks finish higher in the standings than the Faiders so I'm a 
    happy camper.  Carloskiwitz,  Pray that Art stays and that he grows
    some eggs and stands up to Uncle Al the mobster and runs the team
    the way it should be.  If he doesn't,  the Faiders will take the spot
    of SD at the bottom of the AFC west for some time to come.  
    
    BG
    
    P.S.  I shutter to think that Pat Bowlen might be becoming another
         Uncle Al.  I mean...  He fires a winning coach (.500 + over all
         and  .700 + at home) over a control issue.  I my self would 
         have fired Dan for his total lack of creativity and talent
    	 picking.  Bowlen wears the right clothes to become the next 
    	 Uncle.
40.983Raiders should fire ArtROCK::MURPHYJohn Elway - Girly Mon Supreme!Tue Dec 29 1992 19:465
And hire Ditka...

You heard it here first...

Murph
40.984another first! :-)METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 29 1992 19:525
We've had so many "heard it hear first today" that someone will be able
to make a case for being the one to predict just about anything that
happens in sports for the next year!

The Crazy Met
40.985My vote....if'n Shell gets replaced!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Tue Dec 29 1992 20:1811
    I'd rather have Buddy Ryan than Ditka, or anybody else. He'd bring back
    the toughness, and dirty player image the faids have had in the past.
    Although I personally don't think that any of the faids have ever been
    dirty players......just meaner than rattlesnakes.
    
    Carloski
    
    P.S.   Uncle Al is Pat Bowlen's hero, and Pat hopes to someday become
           as great an owner and football wizard as Uncle Al. HtH :-)
    
    
40.986QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 20:346
    
     Ryan or Ditka would never be hired by Uncle Al...  They have the balls
    to stand up to him.  Al's a Bum and I hope Bowlen gets over this
    fetish.  i'm outta here for the week...   Have fun girls !!
    
    BG
40.987Ditka's BallsROCK::MURPHYJohn Elway - Girly Mon Supreme!Wed Dec 30 1992 12:5712
     Ryan or Ditka would never be hired by Uncle Al...  They have the balls
    to stand up to him. 

Actually, Ditka has had little control of off the field operations such
as player slection and signing holdouts.  McCaskey controls the show. But
Ditka knew that before he went in... the Halas family has been notoriously
cheap and controls their team to that end. But hey, that's the family
business, e.g. they are not Eddie Debartalo

Murph
    
40.988WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYWed Dec 30 1992 18:0322
    
    
    
       My New Years gift list for the Raiders.. (please AL read this and
    act on it)..
    
    1 Cut Scroeder
    2 Cut Dickerson
    3 Keep Marcus ( I know this won't happen)
    4 Go get a couple of LB's either with the 12th pick or free agency.
    5 Get out of the Coliseum (no fan noise no 12th man)
    6 Sign  or trade for either (Montana, Esiason, Carlson, or Testaverde)
    7 If Marinovich don't like it Cut that druggie too!!!!!
    8 Leave the Defensive line alone (strongest part of the team)
    9 Gotta get T.Brown more involved with the offense(Marinovich and
    Schroeder can't get him the ball (see #6) find someone who can.
    10 Give Ronnie Lott (best safety in football a new 3 yr contract)
    
    Do this uncle Al and we're back on the way to contention.....
    
    Chappy
     
40.989Heh Heh,,,,,SALEM::KUPTONRed Sox - More My AgeWed Dec 30 1992 18:142
    	The Pat's will just give them Jeff Carlson...you don't have to
    wish................8^)
40.990WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYWed Dec 30 1992 18:2210
    
    
    Cody not Jeff....:-)
    
    
         Just think I was thinking about giving you Sarunas too Ken...
    
                                           Tsk tsk tsk..
    
    Chappy
40.991Just wait til nexted year!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Thu Dec 31 1992 14:5523
40.992TM SIPS.........WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYThu Dec 31 1992 15:175
    
    
         BTW Carlos Schroeder is or never was my hero I just think he's
    better than That no armed, dancing footed, Coke sniffing, QB choice of
    yours. :-) 
40.993:-)ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Thu Dec 31 1992 16:059
    Oh yeah...well, while that no armed, dancing footed, Coke sniffing, QB
    choice of mine was putting up numbers averaging about 230 yards/game
    (even went as high as 395 yards once) old Shredder was putting up
    numbers closer to ~90 yards/game. The only other difference between
    these two QB's is that TM is young and inexperienced....Shredder isn't.
    
    Carlos
    
    
40.994Committment to Freebasing??????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYThu Dec 31 1992 16:227
    
    
        Carlos how many games did we win with Todd as the Starter? 2
    Schroeder started in the 5 wins.
                  Just win Baby 
    
    Chappy....
40.995OK, one more time......CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeThu Dec 31 1992 16:4410
    
    Yabbut youze guys always forget that Shredder got stuffed into a
    garbage truck and squished!
    
    Doncha 'memeber?
    
    I remain,
    'membering
    Kev
    
40.996QUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesSat Jan 02 1993 16:216
     I love it,  faider fans debating whose their better/WORSE QB!!
    
     I wouldn't give shreader the win in washington since it was old man
    evans that won that game for them, even though shred did start.
    
     Tim
40.997PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 04 1993 13:021
    Has Marinovich failed a drug test recently or something?
40.998ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Jan 04 1993 14:3617
40.999This is how ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Jan 04 1993 14:5811
    Carlos,
    
    It's all "da schroom effect", attributable to dInZ putting halugenic
    stuff in Chainsaw's gahden!
    
    good stuff too!
    
    I remain,
    'splaining it all for I know!
    Kev
    
40.1000got it!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Jan 04 1993 14:581
    
40.1001ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Jan 04 1993 15:1711
40.1002da "flashback" effect does it to them. hth ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Jan 04 1993 15:191
    
40.1003sorta like catnip, doncha know....CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeMon Jan 04 1993 15:201
    
40.1004Shroomnip ???ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Jan 04 1993 15:382
    
    
40.1005Kev never exhaled! 8^)CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Mon Jan 04 1993 15:451
    
40.1006Sorry,no more drug references ....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYMon Jan 04 1993 15:5510
    
    
         I'm not blasting TM for taking illegal drugs in the past. I'm
    blasting him cuz he Suc$s and he hasn't got a Pro QB arm or the
    instincts or anything else that a good young QB should have. I being a
    fan who is use to having his team win, Does not want to experiment in 3
    or 4 years of mediocrity while they experiment with this jughead.
       (ie....Mark Wilson...)
    
    Chappy
40.1007Give him a little more time....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Jan 04 1993 17:2717
40.10088^)CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Mon Jan 04 1993 18:066
    Hey!
    I know Joe Montana, and believe me, TM is no Joe Montana!
    
    HTH,
    MikeL
    
40.1009Uncle Al's planFRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VMon Jan 04 1993 21:322
    Boomer will be the next QB for the Raiders (a desparately needed one
    too!).  He'll be great for the silver & black.
40.1010Go with JoeHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortMon Jan 04 1993 21:406
Forget Boomer. 

Bring in Joe Montana. He's rumored to be leaving SF at the end of the
season and the Raiders would be a natural.

TTom
40.1011stick a fork in Joe, he's too oldFRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VMon Jan 04 1993 23:001
    
40.1012No comparison....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Tue Jan 05 1993 17:2618
40.1013ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Jan 05 1993 17:593
    
    
    Joe will be in Minnesota next year... bank on it.
40.1014He's still a mafioso bum !!QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 18:337
    
     Joe will go to the Raiders...  Ifn he don't Boomer would be a good
    second choice for Uncle Al.
    
     I know that I'm usually very hard on Uncle Al but I have to hand it 
    to him on his stand against the proposed agreement with the players.
    Free agency will ruin the NFL.  Stand Tall, Al...
40.1015Just one more reason to dislike Al Davis...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 05 1993 18:4415
    
    > I know that I'm usually very hard on Uncle Al but I have to hand it 
    > to him on his stand against the proposed agreement with the players.
    > Free agency will ruin the NFL.  Stand Tall, Al...
    
    Baloney.  Uncle Al just sabotaged the owners' last good faith efforts 
    to make peace with the players after five years of animosity and chaos.
    Let's face it, when it comes to money, good ol' Hall of Fame Al 
    would ditch the Raider family and mystique and all that crap and sell 
    out his own mother if he had to.  We saw that all too well with the
    abandonment of Oakland, the lawsuits against the NFL, the con jobs with
    Irwindale and Oakland again, etc., etc.
    
    glenn
    
40.1016The situation would be right for him hereANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Tue Jan 05 1993 18:569
    I would not be surprised at all to see Montana here in Minnesota next
    year.  With Green coaching and Craig here the SF influence may help.
    I know Montana's going to want to be protected and the Vikes have a
    pretty good offensive line.  The one major area they need improvement
    is at QB.  I honestly believe that with Montana they have a very good
    shot at winning it all next year.
    
    
    Spud
40.1017QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 19:2310
    
     Glenn,
    
     the owners were about to sell the farm.  The players version of free
    agency would ruin the nfl.  Football is a very team oriented sport.
    you need consistency especially on the o-line.  With free agency the 
    good team would be those with the bucks.  that sucks !!  Thank again AL
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    BG
40.1018Regardless, the league needs a settlement, desperatelyNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 05 1993 19:3823
    
    > the owners were about to sell the farm.  The players version of free
    > agency would ruin the nfl.  Football is a very team oriented sport.
    > you need consistency especially on the o-line.  With free agency the 
    > good team would be those with the bucks.  that sucks !!  Thank again AL
    > !!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    The owners were offering free agency after five years with the right to
    retain at least one (and possibly more) "franchise player".  The average 
    NFL career is over in less than five years.  Somehow, some way, the sport 
    manages to overcome that kind of massive injury-induced personnel 
    turnover.  Hell, Al Davis should know more than anybody that even a team
    comprised of cast-offs from other organizations can be put together and
    made a winner.  Davis made a living doing so, back when being a Raider
    meant something!
    
    Besides, none of this will mean a damn thing after da judge decides to 
    hold the NFL to the laws of the land and releases every player not under
    contract to free agency anyway.  Now *that* will be chaos.  Thanks 
    Uncle Al!!!!!!
    
    glenn
    
40.1019PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 05 1993 19:405
40.1020QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 20:0720
    
     Yea...  And tickets alread top $35.00.  With the $$$$ slinging that is
    sure to follow free agency an average guy like me won't be able to
    afford to go to a game.  I'm on the list for season tickets for the
    Broncos and hope to get the nod in the next few years.  with free
    agency I won't be able to afford them when the time comes. 
    
    HTH
    
    BG
    
    P.s.  I believe that free agency in some form is good...  But not in the
          form that it was almost agreed upon.  That 5 years stat is
          greatly skewed by loser bums that are drafted and never take the
          field...  the players that are gonna get the bucks and are the 
          ones whos careers last 10-15 years.  These are the same players
          that will drasticly effect the teams they leave/go to.  There
          needs to be some control and protection for the teams.
    
    
40.1021PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 05 1993 20:105
40.1022QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 20:417
    
     You really think that ticket prices won't sky rocket...  Wake up.
    And as far as TV goes,  you'll be paying to watch football on cable
    or worse yet pay per view...  Yea,  free agency will be great for the 
    players but the fans will pay the price
    
    BG
40.1023You mean NFL owners have been giving us a break?NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 05 1993 21:0218
    > You really think that ticket prices won't sky rocket...  Wake up.
    > And as far as TV goes,  you'll be paying to watch football on cable
    > or worse yet pay per view...  Yea,  free agency will be great for the 
    > players but the fans will pay the price
    
    You'll pay whether there's free agency or not.  How can you use an
    argument that the ticket prices are too high already under the current
    system to defend that system?  Let's face it, NFL owners will charge
    what they think they can get.  I stopped going to Foxborough four years
    ago primarily for that very reason...
    
    Baseball, with the most liberal of all free agent systems, is still the
    best ticket bargain in sports.  Hockey and football are probably the 
    worst, with the most limitations on free agency.
    
    glenn
    
40.1024QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 21:1116
    
     I never said that current prices were to high.  And,  with 160+ games
    per team, per year baseball tickets should be cheap.  I don't have the
    stats but I'd be willing to bet that relatively successful baseball
    teams surpasses the attendance of a relatively successful football team
    within the first half of the baseball season.  One more fact... over
    1/3 of baseball teams a money losers...  I wonder why, could it be the
    absolutely outragous money being paid to players...  Nah...  That
    couldn't have anything to do with it. 
    
     I can't believe you can defend the money made in baseball and want to
    see the samething in football...  Big Al did us a favor...  Thank him !
    
    
    
    BG
40.1025QUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesTue Jan 05 1993 21:242
      Where did you get this fact of 1/3 of baseballs teams are losing $$
    BG?
40.1026QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 21:327
    Just heard it on one of those year in review shows a few days back. 
    they were talking about how major league salaries skyrocketed this
    year and the firing of Fey and the financial status fo the league.
    they really said some percentasge but it was close to 1/3 if I remember
    correctly.
    
    BG
40.1027Owners weren't "giving" anything away...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 06 1993 12:2817
    
    > I can't believe you can defend the money made in baseball and want to
    > see the samething in football...  Big Al did us a favor...  Thank him !
    
    You're missing the point, BG.  The football deal included a percentage 
    revenue cut for the players, an individual team salary cap with no
    strict minimum, and salary restrictions for draftees (NFL pay for 
    unproven rookies is the one area that's really gotten out of hand).  
    This was negotiated between the owners and players after many years of 
    bickering and represented a *compromise*, a compromise much less 
    appealing to the players than baseball's system.  Al Davis is a control 
    freak who doesn't want to give up anything, and nuked the compromise.
    Now Judge Doty may impose just about anything, up to and including
    total free agency and the abolition of the draft.  Face it, Uncle Al is 
    a bum!
    
    glenn
40.1028PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 06 1993 13:437
40.1029PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jan 06 1993 13:456
40.1030QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonWed Jan 06 1993 14:3110
    
     Well,  Maybe fact is a bit of a strong word...  I heard it on one of
    those year in review programs on TV...  At any rate, I do agree with
    many aspects of the near aggrement.  I like the Cap, I like the Rookie
    pay limits but this "Compromise" was not the best thing for FB. 
    Granted, what is imposed by the courts may not be either.  99% of the
    time I would agree with you about Uncle Al...  In fact I'm usually the
    first to slam him.  This time I think he did us (the fan) a favor.
    
    BG
40.1031ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Wed Jan 06 1993 15:2221
    In all these notes I haven't seen one mention of the other NFL owner
    who was also involved in this conflict of interests, or what Uncle Al
    is arguing about. IMHO the president of the Rams orginization has done
    more to stall the agreements than AD. Alls Uncle Al wants is a little
    more control (6 month deadline for free agents to sign) for all the
    owners, so's that their teams will be able to keep somewhat of a
    nucleus to work around. The Rams' president started going back and
    complaining about everything else that they've already reached
    agreement on....
    
    Uncle Al's induction into the HoF was no fluke, and he got there
    because of his football smarts (both the business, and game aspects of
    the sport), and for this reason Al Davis is always gonna be one of the
    most outspoken of owners around......he knows what's going on, and if
    anybody has really gone into great detail about how all this
    free-agency stuff is gonna affect the game of football (NFL) as we know
    it today and hopefully tommorrow....you can bet it's good old Uncle Al.
    
    Keep up the good work AD.
    
    Carloski
40.1032QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonWed Jan 06 1993 19:164
    
     Hey... Wheres my thank you for sticking up for Uncle Al.
    
    BG
40.1033NOT!!!!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MI want 9999Wed Jan 06 1993 19:176
    
    
    Thanks BG....... It really meant alot I know it warmed my heart as it
    must have warmed Carlos'''''s
    
    Chappy
40.1034Whatever Al says or does must be right, because he's Al...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 06 1993 19:3919
    
    > ...he knows what's going on, and if
    > anybody has really gone into great detail about how all this
    > free-agency stuff is gonna affect the game of football (NFL) as we know
    > it today and hopefully tommorrow....you can bet it's good old Uncle Al.
      
    Geez... obviously to some Uncle Al can absolutely do no wrong, and
    walks on water while avoiding it.  I suppose that when Uncle Al 
    made the decision to sell out the people of Oakland that he also 
    examined how it would "affect the game of football (NFL) as we know it".  
    And the same when he filed suit against the NFL and testified against 
    the NFL in the USFL lawsuit.  All good things for the game of football
    and the NFL, no doubt.
    
    Let's be serious.  Al Davis' track record is as plain as day:  Al Davis
    does what's good for Al Davis, period.
    
    glenn
    
40.1035;-)FRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VWed Jan 06 1993 20:362
    Wouldn't Uncle Al and Ditka be perfect for each other and the Silver &
    Black image?