[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_91

Title:CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid
Notice:This file has been archived. New notes to CAM3::SPORTS.
Moderator:CAM3::WAY
Created:Fri Dec 21 1990
Last Modified:Mon Nov 01 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:290
Total number of notes:84103

36.0. "Bronco notes" by CSC32::SALZER () Thu Jan 03 1991 02:34

    Well I haven't had seen such a miserable season since the
    first strike shortened one back when. Denver played well
    in most every game this season but couldn't pull out the W's.
    They finished with about the 4th worst record yet no one 
    man handled or even beat them badly. The foundation of 
    a good team is still very much in tact. An improved draft
    position with some smart selections could be just the shot they need.
    They say you have to play thru the injuries and that is 
    true to a point. Too many to critical positions witgh a thin
    depth on the bench can really impact the record. 
    
    Sammy Winder is gone. He provided some terrific performances
    in the past never griped when removed from starting and was 
    always ready to go in. He retires to his construction business
    in Mississippi. He has always prepared himself for life 
    after football and I wish him nothing but the best.
    
    BoB
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
36.1COMET::WADEBuffs ROOL!Thu Jan 03 1991 14:047
    
    	I think the Broncos should concentrate on getting some
    	defensive help come draft day.  They need two DL, one or
    	two LBs, and two legitimate cornerbacks with speed (does
    	the Rocket wanna play corner in the pros?).
    
    	Claybroon
36.2My .02COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Jan 03 1991 16:0919
    re-1  Ditto except on the LBs.  I think they are only week there in the
    way they are used.  Wymon Henderson should be benched/waived as well as
    Holmes on the line.  If denver could get a big agressive DLinemen, then
    you could look for the defense to be very good.
    
      I feel 1 reason there passing defense lacks is do to the pressure
    that doesn't exsist.  This is why teams have had such great succsess
    throwing the ball against denver, 'cause when you have all day to throw
    the ball, eventually someone will be open.
    
      Denver still has a good ruch defense IMO.
    
       The offense is there if better plays are inserted.  REeves should do
    some "benchmarking" from other teams playbooks.
    
      Denver also better start looking for a QB in the next few drafts,
    'cause Elway won't last forever.  He just finished year #8.
    
    		T-bone  (thanks Claybroon)
36.3CSC32::SALZERFri Jan 04 1991 00:349
    A major attitude adjustment is in order for this team. If Holmes
    tries anything cute like holding out again......he should be gone.
    If Kay or any other 2nd, 3rd or 4th time offender picks up so much
    as a jay walking ticket.....they're outta there. Henderson is just
    plain outta there. QB selection should be considered in later rounds.
    Winder leaving opens a slot for another rb. But I agree with earlier
    notes. Emphasis will be on defensive players both line and secondary.
    
    BoB 
36.4BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsMon Jan 07 1991 21:2826
    Denver will flip with the Rams tomorrow to decide who gets the 4th pick
    in the draft.  I wouldn't say Holmes is necessarily gone.  That holdout
    set him way back, and with a full camp he could return to his form of
    1989.  Cornerback is definitely a need, but I agree that the biggest
    problems are on the line.  The defensive problems aren't quite as bad
    as they've been made out to be, because Carreker and Braxton went down
    early in the season with injuries, and the move of Mecklenberg to the
    outside turned out to be a disaster.  But there's still more needs on
    the defensive side of the ball.
    
    The offensive line is a big problem area, especially when it comes to
    depth.  Backups at running back are the only other real need on
    offense.  I don't think it's necessary to look for a replacement to
    Elway yet. 
    
    I'd love to see the Broncos get Russell Maryland, but I don't even know
    if he'll last until the 4th pick.  Mel Kiper recently said the top 2
    players in the draft will be Rocket and Maryland.
    
    Top 3 areas of need for Denver IMO:
    1. Defensive Line
    2. Offensive Line
    3. Cornerback
    
    
    Joe
36.5Who won the toss (as if it matters).COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Jan 08 1991 19:183
      Excuse my ignorance, but who is Russell Maryland?
    
    		Tim
36.6he'd definitely help the Bronco defenseSTAR::YANKOWSKASDo the Bartman!Tue Jan 08 1991 19:227
    re .5:
    
    Russell Maryland is a defensive tackle from the University of Miami who
    is projected as one of the first few overall picks in the draft.
    
    
    py
36.8more info...COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Jan 10 1991 21:483
      How big is he?  And how fast, plus any college stats would be nice?..
    
    		T-bone
36.9CSC32::SALZERFri Jan 11 1991 01:284
    Anybody hear who won the coin flip between Rams and Broncos?
    
    BoB
    P.S. Only 5 more shopping days before WW III. 
36.10Bob, the Donks won it....COMET::WADEBuffs ROOL!Fri Jan 11 1991 13:131
    
36.11BSS::JCOTANCHCU: Back-to-Back Big 8 ChampsFri Jan 11 1991 13:284
    Maryland is 6-2, 272, and has ordinary speed, but is a very intense and
    aggressive player.
    
    Joe
36.12QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Fri Jan 11 1991 18:055
I vote for Lyght or Williams

dancing Dorks need not  apply.

Mike JN (SIDJNOTY)
36.13Todd Lyght in Orange?...Sounds good.BSS::JCOTANCHCU: 1990 Big 8 & National ChampionsMon Jan 14 1991 14:4811
    Although it's very early, it seems like Toddy Lyght would be an
    excellent pick, assuming he's available at 4th and Maryland is already
    gone.  I was thumbing through a report by Joel Bishbaum the other day,
    and he said that Lyght is the 7th best cornerback prospect coming out
    since 1969.  That's pretty damm impressive!  Of course, that's only one
    man's view.  It'll be very interesting to see what the other 'experts'
    have to say about him as the draft nears.  I've heard his weaknesses
    are his speed (although it's considered to be above average), and his
    tackling.
    
    Joe
36.14QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Jan 14 1991 14:579
!?!?!?!??!!?!??!?

If speed and tackling are weaknesses
What the hail is he supposed to be doing at Cornerback for the Donks!?!?

Selling souvenier Officer Perry badges!?!?!

!?!?!?!?!?
Mike JN
36.15BSS::JCOTANCHCU: 1990 Big 8 & National ChampionsMon Jan 14 1991 15:307
    His speed is good, they're just saying it's not world-class.  It's one
    of the few 'weaknesses' they could point out in this guy, if you want
    to call it that.  As far as his tackling, it's something he can work on.
    If Lyght's cover skills are as good as reported, he's definitely worth
    a high pick.  Good cover guys come few and far between.
    
    Joe                      
36.16Sounds like a great pick..SALEM::DODAWorthy's X-mas list: Ho, Ho, HoMon Jan 14 1991 15:3810
From my draft report:

Todd Lyght:   6-1 181 speed: 4.3

May be the finest athlete in the'91 draft; has 
blazing speed, lightning quickness, very happy feet and great 
instincts. Will shut down an opponents best receiver 1-1, gives 
almost no cushion, is technically sound, plays smart. He hit 
hard, is a very sure, crisp tackler in the openfield, plays run 
well. May be 1st pick.
36.17MCIS1::DHAMELGet out your maps & erasers, classMon Jan 14 1991 16:007
    
    Draft Lyte!
    
    Some say he's less thrilling.  I say he plays great!
    
    Dickstah
    
36.18QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Jan 14 1991 17:273
No flies on Dickstah

Mike JN
36.19BSS::JCOTANCHCU: 1990 Big 8 & National ChampionsMon Jan 14 1991 17:413
    RE .16
    
    Whose scouting report was this?  Certainly is an impressive one.
36.20OURGNG::RIGGENAir Force, CSU, CU... Denver Bronco'sTue Jan 15 1991 13:228
Todd Lyght is the pick in the Draft. 


Advantage is he can walk on the field and play from day 1. 
Alfred Williams is about 15lbs under weight. 
The Miami Hurricanes "danc'n fool" isn't a Bronco type player. 

Jeff
36.21BSS::JCOTANCHCU: 1990 Big 8 & National ChampionsTue Jan 15 1991 14:1712
    I'm not really that excited about Alfred Williams, at least not as a
    top 10 pick.  Most scouts are projecting him at defensive end, but I
    think he's best suited as an outside 'backer.  One of his strengths is
    being able to drop back into coverage, and you'd be taking that away if
    you moved him to the line.  If someone did want to move him to the
    line, I think he would need to put on about 30 pounds, and he's had
    a hard time trying to put on weight.  
    
    IMO, not worth the 4th pick in the draft.
    
    Joe
        
36.22COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Jan 15 1991 15:1012
     re-1   Alfred on the d-line?  He only weighs 235 lbs.  Another 10lbs
    and he would be great for LB.
    
      The donks need someone who can get to the QB.  Maybe they should hire
    Peters who the Vikes let go.  He luvs the pass rush defense, and thats
    exactly what denver needs.  Obviously Denver isn't going to get enough
    lineman to make a big impact, so if they have a guy that can teach them
    the method of getting to the QB, then they can make best of what they
    have.  SEem logical??
    
    
    		T-bone
36.23I'd pick McGhee over WilliamsCOMET::WADEBuffs ROOL!Tue Jan 15 1991 16:427
    
    T-bone,
    
    	I thought exactly the same thing when I read that Peters had
    	been fired.  Cut loose Phillips and snatch up Peters!
    
    Claybroon
36.24QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Jan 15 1991 17:1810
New England picked up Joe Collier as Defensive Co-ordinator.

They could have done worse... Collier was always considered one of the
best.

With him as D- Co-ordinator, the Donks never lost  to the 49ers. In
fact, the Broncos are the only team `the genius' bill Walsh failed to
beat... EVER... either in preseason or regular season.

Mike JN
36.25Nice while it lasted ...SHALOT::HUNTBippity Boppity BooTue Jan 15 1991 17:2310
36.26QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Jan 15 1991 17:3112
36.27CSC32::J_HERNANDEZLushThu Jan 17 1991 19:043
    Yo Mike, your argument is kinda like an Iraqi bragging that the bomb
    that blew up his installation was dropped by a British Tornado and not
    an F-15E. 
36.28BSS::JCOTANCHBills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3Wed Jan 30 1991 21:427
    Dallas and at least 6 other teams are supposedly interested in
    acquiring Gerald Perry from the Broncos.
    
    The Broncos have stated that they will protect Ron Holmes and Dennis
    Smith under plan-B.  
    
    Joe
36.29here's to Hoot and Monty!!CHIEFF::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidThu Jan 31 1991 13:337
 I would think more teams that that would be interested in learning the
 "Denver Death Grip"(tm)....After all Gerald is the master of the hold...

 ;^)

 mike
36.30Plan BBSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Feb 12 1991 21:5837
    This is a bit late, but here is the players the Broncos left
    unprotected in plan B:
    
    Scott Beavers        G
    Kevin Clark          DB/KR
    Kip Corrington       S
    Scott Curtis         LB
    Rick Dennison        LB
    Blake Ezor           RB
    David Galloway       DE
    Paul Green           TE
    Mike Horan           P
    Tim Lucas            LB
    Marc Munford         LB
    Kerry Porter         RB
    Elliott Smith        CB
    Monte Smith          G
    Tim Stallworth       WR
    Anthony Thompson     LB
    Andre Townsend       DE
    David Treadwell      K
    Chris Verhulst       TE
    Sammy Winder         RB
    
    The losses that would hurt most, if they are indeed signed by another
    team, are Clark, Horan, Munford, and Paul Green.  Clark made a definite
    improvement in the return game late in the season.  Horan continues to
    be one of the league's punters, but I'm not too worried about Denver 
    losing him in plan B.  Munford has been a solid backup ILB, and has
    started on a number of occasions, and I think Green showed some
    potential to be a good pass-catching tight end.  Now that Mobley is
    history, Green has a very good shot to make the team next season. 
    Verhulst was highly sought after in last year's plan B, but the Broncos
    didn't use him much this past season.  The Broncos are reported to be
    mildly interested in Mark Bavaro.
    
    Joe
36.31QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Feb 13 1991 14:076
BEAVERS UNPROTECTED!?!?!

Where's my sword and trusty steed?!

Mike JN
36.32COMET::WADEI won't....back....down.Wed Feb 20 1991 13:187
    
    	ESPN reported lasted night that the Broncos hired Ernie Stautner
    	(former Cowboys asst. coach) to be their defensive coordinator.
    
    	What happened to Wade Phillips?
    
    	Claybroon
36.33COOKIE::WAHLWed Feb 20 1991 13:214
    Stautner is the new defensive line coach.  I think Bum Jr. is still the
    defensive boss.  For now.
    
    Dave W.
36.34they'll never loin1WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Feb 20 1991 15:322
       ...and the Donks continue to be the 'home for retired Cowboys'.
                                        Denny
36.35COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Mar 11 1991 19:068
      Just catchin' up here,  but I think the Broncos ought to get the
    Cowboy  cheerleaders if they want to make this a Dallas org.  Actually, 
    they should bring back the Pony Express from years ago.
    
      I don't even think that they have high school chearleaders at donk
    games anymore.....
    
    		T-bone
36.36CSC32::J_HERNANDEZGreenpiece,WhatALeprichaunGetsTue Mar 12 1991 14:421
    Yeh but who cheers for the Pumpkins(tm)?
36.37Linus!!!COMET::WADEI won't....back....down.Tue Mar 12 1991 17:531
    
36.38He's baaaaaackCOMET::WADEI won't....back....down.Wed Mar 13 1991 13:477
    
    	Well folks, it seems that Gerald Perry (aka The Master of the
    	Denver Death Grip(tm)) has decided he would like to still play
    	in Denver.  He apologized to his teammates and to the fans and
    	wants to start anew.  
    
    	Claybroon
36.39So whens the draft..as if it mattersCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Mar 13 1991 22:067
       gee,  this makes my day.....
    
      I wonder if he will even stay outta trouble long enough to get to
    training camp....thats if he doesn't hold out;^
    
    
      Linus???   Thats a good one!!!!!
36.40Draft is April 21st...BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Wed Mar 13 1991 22:423
    Everyone deserves a 2nd chance, but Perry's had 3 or 4.  With all the
    off-the-field problems Denver's had with its players the last few
    years, the last thing they should do now is bring back Perry.
36.41Trade himCOMET::WADEI won't....back....down.Thu Mar 14 1991 13:368
    
    	I agree but who knows what Reeves is thinking.  He never said
    	"Good riddance!" when Perry announced his retirement.  Danny
    	made a point of not giving up on him.  Of course, it's hard to
    	make the team from a jail cell.  He's still got two (at least
    	one) court cases pending against him.
    
    	Claybroon
36.42BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Wed Mar 20 1991 20:388
    The Broncos are expected to make their first plan B signing today,
    left cornerback Charles Dimry of the Atlanta Falcons.  He is 6', 180
    pounds and ran a 4.4 40 in a private workout for the Broncos.  He has
    been a starter for the Falcons for the past 2 seasons.  I guess the
    Broncos aren't sure how well Braxton will come back, even though he was
    expected to be fully recovered for next season.
    
    Joe
36.43CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 20 1991 20:537
	Charles Dimry joined the Falcons' very weak secondary last year.
	He did start most of the time, which accounts for the fact that he
	was burned so many times.  The guy was awful last year.  This from
	an Atlanta resident who has been waiting for a resurgance from the
	Falcons.

	This is not a steal.  The Broncos can have him.
36.44Dimry ???SHALOT::HUNTSwatch dogs and Diet Coke headsThu Mar 21 1991 00:304
 Didn't Joe Montana and Jerry Rice have a monster day against Dimry ???   
 I know Randall Cunningham and the Eagles' wideouts carved him up.
 
 Bob Hunt
36.45EARRTH::BROOKSIn memorium : Al Cote ...Thu Mar 21 1991 12:2524
    Most of Rice's 5 TD's came against him .... but don't be too hard on
    Dimry yet. Rememeber, we're talking about Jerry Glanville here. He
    demands a lot of one on one coverage, and that's a formula for disaster
    for almost any CB. 
    
    Example : Why the hell wasn't Sanders covering Rice last year ? The
    best against the best, right ? Instead, the poor kid gets man to man,
    with no help, against the guy who may well be the best WR in NFL
    history. Ha.
    
    Example 2 : Glanville BURIED Richard Johnson on the Oilers last year
    in favor of his favorites Steve Brown, Patrick Allen and Jeff Donaldson.
    The Oilers got killed in 2-minute situations. If it wasn't fo the front
    office, Johnson would have been waived. Supposedly, Johnson didn't play
    Glanville's style of man to man.
    
    Pardee comes in, gives Rich a fair chance. He wins a starting job, and
    ties for the AFC lead in interceptions (first timean Oiler did that in
    10 years, and the 1st Oiler corner ever).
    
    So give Dimry a chance - leaving Atlanta may be the best thing that
    ever happened to him.
    
    Doc
36.46BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Fri Mar 29 1991 13:0317
    The Broncos have now officially signed 2 plan B free agents, CB Charles
    Dimry from Atlanta as expected, and guard Crawford Ker from Dallas. 
    Ker is expected to compete for a spot at left guard, and Juriga will
    move to left if Perry doesn't come back.  (And hopefully, he won't!)
    The Broncos, like most other teams, took a much different approach to
    plan B this year and only signed guys who they felt would seriously
    challenge for a roster spot, instead of signing a bunch of free agents,
    only to have half of 'em get cut before the end of training camp.
    
    Horan turned down offers from Washington and SF and will stay with the 
    Broncos.  He supposedly had a chance to become the highest paid punter 
    in NFL history.
    
    On the draft front, the Broncos are reportedly leaning toward Nebraska
    LB Mike Croel.
    
    Joe
36.47ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Mar 29 1991 20:3011
    >>The Broncos, like most other teams, took a much different approach
    >>to plan B this year and only signed guys who thet felt would
    >>seriously challenge for a roster spot, instead of signing a bunch
    >>of free agents, only to have half of 'em get cut before the end
    >>of training camp.
    
    Gee, and to think it only took the Donks two years to figure out
    what Uncle Al's known all along. Who ever said donkeys were dumb
    animals anyhow?  :-)
    
    Carlos
36.48COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Apr 01 1991 19:373
      I see Carlos is back;^  
    
    	T-bone
36.49COMET::WADEI won't....back....down.Mon Apr 01 1991 21:095
    
    	Yeah T-Bone, and it only took him 3 months to recover from
    	the drubbing the Bills put on his Faiders(tm).  8-)
    
    	Claybroon
36.50COMET::WADEI won't....back....down.Wed Apr 03 1991 16:365
    
    	Clarence Kay was arrested for DUI.  I think this will be
    	strike 3 for him.......
    
    	Claybroon
36.51ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Apr 04 1991 16:1211
    Re. .48 & .49
    
    And to think all this time I thought you guys didn't care, why, ol
    Claybroon was even counting the months .... how touching.
    
    Re. .50
    
    I think Kay averted the lifetime suspension because his b.a.l. was
    only .093, just below the intoxication limit of .1 percent.
    
    Carlos
36.52COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Apr 04 1991 19:045
      Kay is a good back up anymore.  He cost the Broncs 2 games last year
    with dropped passes in the endzone.  I don't think he will be as big of
    a loss as Reeves leads onto, same goes for Perry......
    
    	Tim
36.53AGNT99::CHILDSI'm doin' fine-e-e-e-e on cloud 9Fri Apr 05 1991 14:445
 Ah Danny just stockpiling excuse for another 5-11 season...next we'll be 
 hearing about Johnny's hangnails...

 mike
36.54Biff get manicures probably.COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Apr 08 1991 20:026
      re-1  Time will tell on the record.  The Broncos will either flop or
    go to the big one just like always.
    
      You just better hope your Stellers stay out of the cellers.....
    
    		Tim
36.55BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Mon Apr 15 1991 14:5414
    The latest news out of Denver is the Broncos won't draft Nick Bell or
    Todd Lyght.  The coaching staff doesn't consider Lyght much better than
    a handful of other corners available, and they probably won't pick a
    corner until at least until the 3rd round.
    
    Most likely scenario remains that they will take Croel with the 4th
    pick.  If Croel is gone, the word is they may take Alfred Williams.
    Another likely scenario is they would trade down with Dallas and get 2
    of their 1st-round picks, and probably take Eric Swann and a wide
    receiver.  The Broncos would probably give up their 4th pick and a
    later-round pick or their 4th pick and Perry for Dallas' 2 1st round
    picks.
    
    Joe
36.56Give 'em Kay tooooCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Apr 15 1991 19:019
      Give up on Perry.  Dallas is another team with controversy, and ole
    Gerald (I never touched her) would fit right in.
    
      I hope the Broncos go defense all the way this year.  Only need 1
    offensive player for sure, and thats a good backup to Humphrey.
    
      The o-line should be ok for this year as long as they stay healthy.
    
    	T-bone
36.57BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSMon Apr 15 1991 20:544
    Can't believe you're saying this stuff Tim.  The o-line and d-line seem
    to be the real needs for the Broncos IMHO.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.58and QB...MAXWEL::CHILDSmy hero, Brian Boitano on bladesTue Apr 16 1991 12:360
36.59COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Tue Apr 16 1991 14:5714
   I'd definitely like to see the Donks peddle Officer Perry. I keep
   hearing talk about Perry and the #4 to Dallas for the 12 and 13 pick.
   This would be a super deal.

   I'd also like to see Denver bring back Kelly at Tight End and dump
   Clarence Kay. Also, see them alternate starts between Shannon Sharpe
   and Mike (mumble), and get rid of one or more of the three dwarf amigos
   and pick up a good corner instead.

   I also had a picture sent to me of a shrine to John Elway located in
   MikeC's bedroom, right next to the Larry Bird shrine. I think that
   shows a lotta class on Child's part.

   Mike JN
36.60OURGNG::RIGGENI need some sensible shoesTue Apr 16 1991 16:485
Denver will deal the #4 pick to anybody for a combination pair of later 
1st rounders. They will pick Herman Moore, or Mike Pritchard for WR help. 
late 3rd will pick George Hemmingway. The draft is deep in wr and denver 
could easily deal Vance "can't dance" Johnson or Mark Jackson and the #4 
for Eric Swann and a wr. 
36.61BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Thu Apr 18 1991 17:3410
    Gary Kubiak will undergo surgery Friday morning to repair a ruptured
    disc in his lower back.  He suffered the injury a couple of weeks ago in
    weight training.  His future in football dependson the extent of the
    damage and the success of his recovery.  Denver may have to start the
    season without Kubiak, because they are talking at least 3 months but
    by the time he gets his strength back it could be into the season.
    
    This could definitely change Denver's early-round draft plans.
    
    Joe  
36.62RAiders are in deep @$@#$%^ this yearCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Apr 18 1991 20:074
      Thats to bad about Kubiak, so now it looks as though they need a QB
    as well.
    
    		Tim
36.63COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Apr 18 1991 21:199
      Re-Glenn,   I think the O-line will be ok if they are healthy.  I
    also said they need defense allllll they way.  Safety is there only
    real strong points on defense right now IMO, with the exception of Meck
    at the inside.
    
      I think Pritchard would be a steal if he is still around when Denver
    has there opprotunities in later rounds.
    
    	Tim
36.64BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSThu Apr 18 1991 21:443
    You're right Tim, Pritchart is really underated IMHO.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.65BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Thu Apr 18 1991 22:094
    I'll be very surprised if Pritchard doesn't get picked in the first 
    round.
    
    Joe
36.66I use it to seperate wommin from girls. wommin want LarryCHIEFF::CHILDSYesterday, well it seemed so cool...Fri Apr 19 1991 12:236
 Tim,  actually 2 QBs'....

 JN, good one the other day I still owe on that one...

 ;^)
36.671991 Bronco ScheduleBSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Fri Apr 19 1991 13:0721
    Sept. 1       CINCINNATI        2pm
    Sept. 8       at LA Faiders     2pm
    Sept. 15      SEATTLE           2pm
    Sept. 22      SAN DIEGO         2pm
    Sept. 29      at Minnesota      6pm
    Oct. 6        at Houston        11am
    Oct. 13       Bye               
    Oct. 20       KANSAS CITY       2pm
    Oct. 27       at New Engand     11am
    Nov. 3        PITTSBURGH        6pm
    Nov. 10       LA FAIDERS        2pm
    Nov. 17       at Kansas City    11am
    Nov. 24       at Seattle        2pm
    Dec. 1        NEW ENGLAND       2pm
    Dec. 8        at Cleveland      11am
    Dec. 15       PHOENIX           2pm
    Dec. 22       at San Diego      2pm
    
    
    All times are Mountain
                          
36.68Looks like they'll be at the bottom again.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Apr 19 1991 14:244
    Their first win won't come until Oct. 27th and they'll be lucky
    to win that one, hee hee heeeee.....:-)  God, I love Donk bashing!
    
    Carlos
36.69COMET::WADEHey batter batter SUWING batter!Fri Apr 19 1991 14:388
    Carlos........
    
	
    	Do Mark Lefebvre!  ;^)
    
    Faiders sip!
    
    Claybroon
36.70COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Fri Apr 19 1991 14:417
   The word is that the Donks are negotiating with the Brownstains (tm)
   for the #2 slot, and they want Todd Lyght.

   I still wish they could make a deal with Dallas for the 12 and 13
   picks.

   Mike JN
36.71Perry is gone...finally!BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Mon Apr 22 1991 14:3246
    1st round-Mike Croel, OLB, Nebraska, 6-2, 232 lbs.
    I was upset that they didn't pick Lyght when he was available, but it's
    one of those things where we'll just have to wait a year or 2 and see
    how it turns out.  I sure hope I'm wrong.  Croel is extremely quick for
    a linebacker, and they say he can even cover a wide receiver he's so
    fast.  He's also a very good pass-rusher.  I watched my tape of the
    CU-Nebraska game the other night, and wasn't particularly impressed by
    Croel.  He seemed to be blocked out of the play fairly easily, but his
    speed was definitely evident.  In defense of him though, Nebraska sent
    him back in coverage quite a bit, CU didn't pass all that much, and
    they ran away from him alot.  Plus, that's only one game.  
    
    2nd round-Reggie Johnson, TE, Florida State, 6-1, 256 lbs.
    Great blocking tight end, but certainly not a great receiver, although
    they didn't throw the ball to him that much at FSU.  I think he's an
    excellent player for Reeves' offense, but he probably could've been had
    in the 3rd or even 4th round.  Plus, Adrian Cooper of Oklahoma was also
    a great blocker and a little more proven as a receiver.  Cooper was
    taken in the 4th by Pittsburgh.
    
    3rd round-Keith Traylor, ILB, Central State, Oklahoma, 6-2, 260 lbs.
    May have been the best ILB in this draft, and I saw him projected by
    some experts as a first-rounder.  Denver certainly wasn't going for
    need here, but they probably took the best player available with this
    pick.  The 4 starters at LB are very solid (assuming Croel to be a
    starter) but they do need the depth, and this guy hopefully will
    provide it.
    
    4th round-Derek Russell, WR, Arkansas, 6-0, 179 lbs.
    Great move by Denver here.  They didn't have a 4th round pick, but
    traded Gerald Perry and a 12th round pick to the Rams for this pick and
    Gaston Green.  Green was a 1st round pick 3 years ago.  He was 4th in
    the league in kickoff returns and will probably end up being that
    backup to Humphrey.  If Perry gets suspended by the league, Denver will
    send a future draft pick to the Rams.  As for Russell, he's not afraid
    to go over the middle and averaged over 20 yards a reception last year. 
    If Denver goes with 5 WR's, Russell, Sharpe, or Nattiel will probably
    be the odd man out.
    
    Since Denver didn't take a QB, they probably either think Kubiak will
    be ready for the regular season or have their sights set on a trade. 
    They are supposedly interested in Scott Erney, who is the starter for
    Barcelona of the WLAF.  Reeves said he would've taken Dan McGuire if he
    was still on the board when Denver picked in the 2nd round.
    
    Joe
36.72COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Mon Apr 22 1991 17:466
   Did Craig Erickson (QB Miami) get picked yet?
   He wouldn't be a bad Elway backup, and he would have a couple years to
   learn the system, either as the heir designate, if he were to blossom,
   or as a continued backup when Elway's replacement comes along.

   Mike JN
36.73Draft Update...Draft Update...BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Mon Apr 22 1991 18:2823
    Today's Bronco picks:
    
    5th round-Greg Lewis, RB, Washington
    6th round-Nick Subis, OL, San Diego State
    7th round-no pick
    8th round-Kenny Walker, DE, Nebraska
    9th round-Don Gibson, OL, USC
    10th round-Curtis Mayfield, WR, Oklahoma State
    
    Personally, I don't understand Denver picking Lewis.  I don't know when
    or where Erickson went, but they said he was available.  Plus, Lewis
    projects as nothing more than a backup to Humphrey, and they just got
    that in Gaston Green.  Kenny Walker pick is certainly interesting. 
    He's one of the fastest defensive linemen in the draft, but they said
    he dropped this far because he is considering going to grad school and
    giving up football.  Nick Subis is listed as a center, but can play
    anywhere along the OL.  I was impressed with Mayfield against CU this
    past season.
    
    Also, I heard Mike Stonebreaker of ND went to the Bears in the 9th
    round.
    
    Joe
36.74GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreMon Apr 22 1991 20:246
    re: Erickson
    
    He went to the Eagles in the fifth round.
    
    Dennis
    
36.75COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Mon Apr 22 1991 20:3114
   Year in and year out the Bears have one of the most solid drafts in the
   league. I wish Dan would ask his buddy Mike for the secret, because,
   except for some occasional flurries of competence, the Donks have
   really got some lemons over the years.... and I don't just mean hte
   usual gambles that don't pay off. I mean some first, and second, round
   picks thtat knowledgeable fans said: What!?!?? They can't be serious!

   And then, of course, they're right.

   Wasting that pick on Lewis doesn't seem especially bright to me. They
   can roll in some plan B's or free agents if they just  need some RB's
   for practice.

   Mike JN
36.76REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Sarah Purcell?Mon Apr 22 1991 20:415
    re .74:
    
    Does that mean with Buddy gone, so is Jimmy Mac?
    
    
36.77BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Apr 23 1991 15:3819
    So what do you guys think about the Shawn Moore pick in the 11th round?
    In case you've been in a cave since last night, the Broncos stole Shawn
    Moore in the 11th round.  I just can't believe this guy fell all the
    way to the 11th round.  Teams may have been scared away by his
    late-season thumb injury and the fact that he may jump to the CFL. 
    Similar situation to Major Harris, maybe?  The Broncos need to get him
    signed.  They'll undoubtedly need to pay more than your typical 11th
    round pick, but the fact of the matter is that it looks like they'll
    need a new backup going into next season, other than someone like a
    Tony Eason.  
    
    Mr. Hunt, you hear anything about why he may have slipped this far, and
    is his thumb completely healed?
    
    The one area Denver didn't address in the draft was cornerback.  I
    guess they're confident they can get 2 decent starters out of
    Henderson, Lang, Dimry, and Braxton.
    
    Joe 
36.78Good talent, nice pick ...EARRTH::BROOKSI'm having an old friend for dinner...Tue Apr 23 1991 17:033
    Moore is a far better QB than Major Harris ... and I can't see how the
    thumb injury was responsible for a drop to the 11th round, unless it
    was amputated ...
36.79DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Tue Apr 23 1991 17:3316
Shawn Moore never demonstrated that he can throw the ball accurately. Most of 
his college completions were lofted balls to Herman Moore who simply out lept
the covering cornerback or safety.

He never demonstrated the ability to throw the quick out with any accuracy. I
bet that he rated low in the scouting combines for arm strength also. Most of
the scouts thought he was a clone of Rice from ND 2 years ago. 

I'm sure Erickson rated low due to size and arm strength also.

Unless you're a big stud and play in a pro set offense in college you can be 
pretty sure that your not going to be a top draft pick in the NFL. 


Metz
36.80ZEMI::HEISERJCM 900 rules!Tue Apr 23 1991 17:393
>  <<< Note 36.78 by EARRTH::BROOKS "I'm having an old friend for dinner..." >>>
    
    nice p_n Doc ;-)  A funny line from a real disgusting movie.
36.81Moore >>>>> RiceBSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Apr 23 1991 18:3914
> He never demonstrated the ability to throw the quick out with any accuracy. I
> bet that he rated low in the scouting combines for arm strength also. Most of
> the scouts thought he was a clone of Rice from ND 2 years ago. 

    A clone of Tony 'Bounce Pass' Rice?!?!  They've gotta be kidding!  Rice
    was strictly an option QB with very little accuracy or arm strength.
    Moore looked like more of a drop-back passer with a great ability to
    scramble, run and improvise.  The guy I would compare him to is
    Cunningham.  I agree that Moore isn't one of the more accurate passers, 
    but I certainly thought he had a strong arm.
    
    Joe
    
36.82HTHRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockTue Apr 23 1991 19:098
    Joe, Doc,
    
    The one scouting report I read about Shawn Moore said "Destined to
    follow Major Harris and Tony Rice - not a pro quarterback.  Canada an
    option."
    
    
    JD
36.83DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Tue Apr 23 1991 19:4613
Strong Arm does not simply mean the ability to throw the ball 60+ yards in
the air. Having a strong arm relates more to throwing the quick out with enough
steam that it doesn't rainbow and gets to the receiver before the DB does.

Marino,Elway and Cunningham have excellent arms. Montana has a good arm. Steve
Walsh has an adequate arm. 


Moore doesn't have it. 


Metz
36.84Didn't expect him to go higher than 9-10th round...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Apr 23 1991 20:3811
    
    There's also that ACC competition thing, where everytime you looked up
    Herman Moore seemed to be about ten yards in the clear.  It probably
    didn't help that Shawn Moore was operating with a wounded limb during 
    the time all the post-season fun versus better defenses was going on, 
    either.
    
    Comparisons to Cunningham?  No way...
    
    glenn
     
36.85EARRTH::BROOKSI'm having an old friend for dinner...Tue Apr 23 1991 21:2723
    Sorry Metz, but I saw Moore a few times, and his arm strength is
    certainly better than advertised. Granted, he is far from polished, but
    to compare him to Tony Rice ? Ridiculous !
    
    Moore was a lot more adaptable as a QB, playing option, pro-set, a
    little wishbone, whatever ... 
    
    Moore certainly has the arm and the raw talent to play in the NFL.
    
    re Erickson,
    
    And when are the scouts going to learn that arm strength isn't
    everything ? 
    
    You guys act as if arm strength is The Gospel. Hell, the sainted Joe
    Montana did not have sufficient arm strength either, if you listened to
    the 'experts' .... now of course Metz and others see him as having a
    'good arm' ... heh heh heh ...
    
    The more I watch a draft, the more I agree with John H. - players are
    not judged enough on *how they play the game* ....
    
    Here's rootin' for Moore and Erickson ...
36.86Let's not make this a racial rathole......DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Tue Apr 23 1991 21:5445
>   Moore was a lot more adaptable as a QB, playing option, pro-set, a
>    little wishbone, whatever ... 

	None of which makes him a bonafide NFL talent. Doc, You gotta realize
that for every Shawn Moore out there that gets mega publicity and tv exposure
there are 3 Kolvaks or Mcgwire's that play in relative college obscurity but
are constantly watched by the scouts. 
    
>    Moore certainly has the arm and the raw talent to play in the NFL.
    

	Obviously the NFL scouts,GM's and coaches disagree with you. With your
track record at picking qb stars (Ware, Harris) I'll stick with the scouts
opinions. However he might be a good project to turn into a defensive back 
(just kidding :-)

You have to remember that the NFL is big business. The combines are geared to
try and draft players that won't fail. For every late round Johnny Johnson that
makes a big impact there are 10 examples of players that did exactly what was
expected of them when drafted. It's not a perfect system but it's success speaks
for itself. The team wastes more on a first round draft choice failure than it
makes up with a late round success story.

>   You guys act as if arm strength is The Gospel. Hell, the sainted Joe
>    Montana did not have sufficient arm strength either, if you listened to
>    the 'experts' .... now of course Metz and others see him as having a
>    'good arm' ... heh heh heh ...


Never did I state the Arm strength is the gospel of QB's. Nor did I 
professionally rate Joe Montana's arm coming out of college and give my input
to the 49ers. There are plenty of strong armed qb's in an NFL uniform that I
think are stiffs (BJ Tolliver, Jay Schroeder, Bubby Brister ). Face the facts
though. You aren't going to be an NFL qb in this day and age without the tools
for the job. Arm strength, height and mobility are the physical tools needed. 
Intelligence, adaptability and coolness are some of the mental traits needed.

The NFL seems to place a priority on the physical over the mental by assuming
that with the physical tools any player can be taught to be a QB. I disagree but
that doesn't make Doug Flutie any taller and you can't teach height.



Metz
  
36.87Let's not get defensive ...EARRTH::BROOKSI'm having an old friend for dinner...Wed Apr 24 1991 13:022
    Hey, there is no racial rathole ... of course people will see what they
    want to ...
36.88AXIS::ROBICHAUDWed Apr 24 1991 15:1113
    	I have to agree with the Doc (despite his shamless attempt to
    steal my only TM).  Most of these "expert" pro scouts don't know
    their arse from their elbow.  Was Montana highly touted?  Or
    Cunningham?  How about Moon or Theisman?  Weren't the Dolphins said
    to be wasting their first draft pick when they took a "suspect"
    Marino.  Remember the guy who was going to be better than Hannah,
    Brown or Shell?  In case you don't here's a few hints.  He plays
    for Green Bay, likes Guns & Roses, and sucks as a football player.
    Tony MandaRICH.  Usually when the scouts unanimously agree you're
    looking a one sorry specimen of a football player.  Remember I said
    "usually".
    
    				/Don
36.89WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Apr 24 1991 15:374
       ...but /Don, they were certainly right about Ken Simms! Remeber what
    'they'said back then: "there should be 2 drafts, one for Simms and
    another for everybody else!"
                                        Denny
36.90RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockWed Apr 24 1991 15:527
    /Don (adn DOC)  Yeah, and for every Runningham and Montana and
    Theismann they are wrong about, there are a zillion players they are
    right on the money about.  
    
    They are exceptions, not the rules.  
    
    JD
36.91AXIS::ROBICHAUDWed Apr 24 1991 16:208
    	No JD.  The NFL did a study of first round draft picks for the
    80's and the exact number may be different, but I believe less than
    50% of the first round draft picks started for their respective
    teams and less than 50% of those made the Pro Bowl.  Clearly something
    is wrong here.  Anybody remember this?  It was one of the reasons
    the owners wanted to initiate a minimum wage for rookies.
    
    				/Don
36.92100 correct draft choices to 1 bad one isn't a bad ratio.....DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Wed Apr 24 1991 16:2216
BTW - The scouts opinions on Tony the MandaRICH were changing up until draft 
	day. A few of the better scouts were saying that he had slow feet. This
	it turns out is true, which is why he's such a piss poor pass blocker. 
	However the scouting combines were still in awe of his brute strength.

He is a perfect reason why the Raiders and a few other teams employ independent 
scouts instead of listiening to the combines 100%

Doc,

 No slur meant on the racial thing. I just mentioned it because you have used it
in the past as a reason why a player didn't get drafted....


Metz
36.937221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 24 1991 16:234
    The draft is nothing more than a crap shoot and all the scouting and
    evaluation is only meant to improve the odds a little bit.
    
    John
36.94NFL owners want a wage scale....intentions are purely honorable I'm sure...DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Wed Apr 24 1991 16:2711
slasher,

Did they continue the study and see how many 2nd round draft choices started and
made the pro bowl? how about 3rd,4th and 5th....

It's a very misleading study (financed by the NFL owners I'm sure) if they just 
used the 2 metrics you stated. 


Metz
36.95AXIS::ROBICHAUDWed Apr 24 1991 17:1110
    	Well Metz if I were the players I would trade a rookie wage
    scale for a less restricted free agency setup.  That way the owners
    would be paying those that produce not just those who went to a
    major university and have "potential".  One of the other benefits
    would be the elimination of agents for college players because they
    really wouldn't need the services of an agent until their first
    or second year as a pro.  The current setup really hurts the middle
    to late rounder who becomes a good but not a great player.
    
    				/Don
36.96VAXWRK::SCHNEIDERLet Sununu hitchhike!Wed Apr 24 1991 17:319
    >	Well Metz if I were the players I would trade a rookie wage
    >scale for a less restricted free agency setup. 
    
    I think the NFL will move in the opposite direction.  Tagliabue said
    during draft day that Plan B won't continue (didn't say exactly when). 
    Given the weakness of the player's union, there will be even less free
    agency if any at all.
    
    Dan
36.97I'm an engineer so I get free agency and low pay :-)DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Wed Apr 24 1991 17:5719
>   >	Well Metz if I were the players I would trade a rookie wage
>    >scale for a less restricted free agency setup. 


It all depends on where I was drafted :-)....If I'm a first round choice I don't
want a rookie wage scale because I can sign for big $$$ and the sit on my butt 
for the rest of my short career (call it the Boz stategy)

If I'm a middle to late round choice I want more free agency because I can show
my stuff and then sign with another team for big $$$. If I'm a proven pro player
I want free agency also. 

If I'm NFL management I want a salary scale based on years of service with no
incentives and no free agency.......


Metz
    
 
36.98LUNER::BROOKSI'm having an old friend for dinner...Wed Apr 24 1991 18:3827
    re .92
    
    Metz I have mentioned it (the racial angle) in the past because I
    beleived it to have been true in some cases. If you disagree fine, it
    is your right. If confronting the issue makes you uncomfortable (it
    must have for you to bring it out of the blue), that's too bad (and I
    don't mean that as a slam) - I call it as I see it (and I can prove a
    few cases, but that - for now - is beside the point). 
    
    And please note that I also voiced simular feelings about Craig
    Erickson as well ....
    
    As for McGwire, he was not a hidden player - mostly because of his
    height and his lineage ... it will be interesting to watch him in
    action.
    
    re Scouting,
    
    I have seen scouts 'blow' more than a few cases. Perhaps the player
    hasn't/didn't reach(ed) the All-Pro level, but he was a pretty
    productive player.
    
    Sometimes there is too much emphasis on the numbers (the Cowboys and
    Paul Brown can be thanked for that), and not enough on intangibles and
    sheer ability to play the game.
    
    Doc
36.99Yawn!!!!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Apr 24 1991 21:096
        Isn't there an NFL draft note for all this "opinionated" debate?
    
      I heard that the 3rd round choice for Denver was arrested before the
    draft.  Looks like he will fit right in;^^
    
    	Tim
36.100OURGNG::RIGGENI need some sensible shoesThu Apr 25 1991 14:247
Remember you guy's DON'T start intellectual Discussions in the Donk note !


Geez you'd think that  Denver picked up a QB that could throw on the 
run because John boy tend to do the same. 

Jeff
36.101Another LBCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue May 21 1991 22:2912
      The Broncs signed an ex-Pueblo Crusader yesterday.  His name slips
    the mind, but he is 6'2" and 233 lbs.  The radio station dj said he was
    a DE, but at that size?
    
      This guy held the record for sacks in the minor leaque.  His total
    was 33 sacks for 1 year.  It was probably the year they beat the
    Colorado Springs Spirit for the minor title. 
    
      He is going to be tried out at outside LB.
    
    
    	Tim
36.102Is Baseball over with yet?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jun 19 1991 14:487
       training camps have started...big deal right?
    
      Well in the case of good junk noting,  Elway will win MVP this year
    as well as finally winning his 1st ring by beating, who else..The
    Vikings!!
    
    	Tim
36.103Football season starts July 12th!!!BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Wed Jun 19 1991 17:289
>       training camps have started...big deal right?
    
    Actually, it is a big deal when you consider we've had to live without
    any football since January.  The camp the Broncos are having right now
    is just a voluntary minicamp - mostly rookies and quarterbacks.  The 
    Broncos open training camp on July 12th. 
    
    Joe
            
36.104ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jun 19 1991 20:3811
    > Elway will win MVP this year as well as finally winning his first
    > ring....
    
    Winning his first ring?     We will see, but don't bet the house 
    on it!    (Hmmm, now where have I heard that before...:-)
    
    Seriously though, I think Elway will start out having a good season,
    then his age; injuries, slower legs, etc... will cath up to him,
    and he'll have to give way to Kojak or whatever his name is....
                                                               
    Carlos
36.105#1??COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jun 19 1991 21:5712
       WOW!!!  A Faider fan saying Elway will start good?   Just that
    little bit is a shock to the eyes;^^^
    
       Hopefully this year the Broncs will only have a few "incidents"
    compared to the past few years, espeacially since Perry is histo.
    
       Minus injuries,  look for the defense to have a good year.  Watch
    for Lelo (sp?) Lang to challenge strongly for the starting CB spot over
    Henderson.  I know, it shouldn't be to difficult considering Hernderson
    is slow a Hienz ketchup....
    
    		Tim
36.106ECAMV3::JACOBIs it DECrap or De Crap???Wed Jun 19 1991 22:1312
    Is Mile High Stadium sold out for all of the Donks games????
    
    I'm going to be in Colorado Springs from Sept 15th thru October 18th
    and would like to take in a game if'n I can get tickets.
    
    Which brings up my next point, are the Donks at home between these
    dates at all?????
    
    Thanks,
    
    JaKe
    
36.107FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jun 20 1991 11:348
    Sept 15	Seattle
    Sept 22	San Diego
    Sept 29	at Minnesota
    Oct 6	at Houston
    Oct 13	Open Date
    Oct 20	Kansas City
    
    John
36.108AGNT99::CHILDSI'll meet you by the 3rd PyramidThu Jun 20 1991 12:005
 the team is so pathetic Jake it should be easy to get tickets. Especially if
 you wait till the oct 20th game because by then they'll be out of the race.

 ;^)
36.109Why see the Broncos when you can watch Pittsburgh!?!SHALOT::MEDVIDthe addiction of duplicitiesThu Jun 20 1991 12:536
    Jake,
    
    I think there's a Steelers club in Colorado Springs.  Let me know if
    you want info on whom to contact and where to see the games.
    
    	--dan'l
36.110Spanish 101ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Jun 20 1991 13:0116
            Just thought I'd throw this in, in the hopes that other 
    anti-Donks might appreciate it. In the Spanish language (might
    be slang ??) there is a term for a little donkey, or ass, that is
    pronounced 'way', although the spelling might be a little different. 
    Usually when it's used to describe a person it's not done with the
    kindest of intentions, your basically calling them an ass, or imbecile.
    Also in Spanish, the word 'El' (like El Cid) means 'the', so then 
    when you put them both together 'El way' or Elway, I think you guys
    can see the ironic humor of it especially considering he plays for
    the Donks.......many :-)
    
    
    
    Carlos
            
36.111BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Thu Jun 20 1991 14:4115
    Jake,
    
    Yes, all the games are sold out, so you can't get tickets through the
    ticket office.  However, if you go up to one of the games an hour or 2
    early, I can guarantee you will find tickets at or below face value
    being sold around the stadium.  The best place to go is the west side
    of the stadium (right near the ticket office), or go to a bar near the
    stadium and ask the people working there if there's any tickets for
    sale.  One exception might be a Faider game, but they're not playing in
    Denver when you are here anyway so you shouldn't have any problem.
    
    P.S.- You're leaving CS a day early.  Boo Hoo Lou's boys are playing at
    the Academy on the 19th.  Oh well.
    
    Joe              
36.112LAGUNA::MAY_BRCharter member of Quoteaholics AnonymousThu Jun 20 1991 15:247
    
    re .110  
    
    Boy CArlos that note is really going to embarass Francis Ass, er Frank
    Way.
    
    Bruce
36.113COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Jun 20 1991 18:206
      Another good spot for tickets is on the off ramp as you get off I-25,
    19th ave I believe is the exit.
    
      re-  Carlos,  It took you this long to come up with that one? 
    
        Tim
36.114CELTIK::JACOBDO NOTHING....and then RestThu Jun 20 1991 18:3610
    Thanks for the info.
    
    The only game the Donks play at home while I'll be there is the San
    Diego game.  Maybe I'll take the advice and head up to Denver.
    
    Dan'l,. send me the info on the Steelers Club in the Springs.  I'd hate
    to miss a month of the Steelers AFC Central championship season.
    
    JaKe
    
36.115ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Jun 20 1991 18:5211
    > Carlos, It took you this long to come up with that one?
    
    Hey Tim, 
    Actually I can't take credit for coming up with it, I overheard
    it some time during the last few years while watching a Donk game
    with some friends. It has taken me this long to enter it in here
    though. I guess it's just one of those things you save for just
    the right time, and this note has been pretty lame lately so I thought
    I'd throw it in just to stir things up a little. 
    
    Carlos
36.116hide the women and childrenGENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelFri Jun 21 1991 14:315
    
    	Oh no!  Jake is invading C Springs?  What're we gonna do
    	about this guys?
    
    	Claybone
36.117ECAMV3::JACOBIs it DECrap or De Crap???Fri Jun 21 1991 18:5516
    
><<< Note 36.116 by GENRAL::WADE "IBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheel" >>>
>                        -< hide the women and children >-
    
    
    Better hide the sheep and dogs, too!!!!!
    
    (8^0*  (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
    Any bars out there where you can toss mid.....Nah, Fergit it!!!!
    (8^)*
    
    
    
36.118Pittsburgh CS ClubSHALOT::MEDVIDthe addiction of duplicitiesSat Jun 22 1991 15:0813
    Jake,
    
    couldn't send mail to your node so here's the info on the CS Steelers
    Club:
    
    Pittsburgh Colorado Springs Club
    contact Jack Dowds
    Home: 719\574-7568
    Work: 719\579-3489 or 719\579-5250
    
    Never talked to Jack but you can still tell him how you got his name.
    
    	--dan'l
36.119Parade in January ?OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Remote Selling ServicesMon Jun 24 1991 18:3311
The mini-camp provided insight that only a one sport city i.e. Denver could
produce Elways muscles. 
Kubiak's back is fixed. 
Braxton's Knee is stronger than ever. 
Nattiel is going to be a ALL-PRO. 


The wr's are running with parachutes because they are sooo fast. 

The O-line is meditating via Kung-Fu on visualizing winning. 

36.120GENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelTue Jun 25 1991 14:0918
    
    	Oh well, since Hoot isn't around anymore...........
    
    	It seems ole Bobby Humphrey and Mel Bratton were riding
    	around in Bobby's new Jeep Cherokee the other night.
    	They crashed into another vehicle.  The occupants of
    	the other vehicle (the hittees  ;^)  ) say that Bobby
    	and Mel switched places so that it would apear that
    	Mel was the driver.  Bobby had alcohol on his breath.
    	He is currently on probation for a DUI he received
    	about a year(?) ago.  
    
    	The Donks organization is *helping* out by providing the
    	hittees with a loaner car while this mess gets cleared
    	up.  Bobby didn't have insurance.  Mel has been charged
    	with the traffic violations.  Stay tuned........
    
    	Claybone
36.121Carlos = closet Bronco fan ;^^COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Jun 25 1991 15:2612
      No not Bobby.....  I remember when Micheal Brooks rolled his Cherokee
    last year.
    
      I'm glad I don't live in Denver,  heck I probably would get hit by
    one of these guys.  Of course, all of us that have been to Denver knows
    what bad drivers there are on the road,  and the worst part, is most,
    whether they live there or not, are originaly from outta town.
    
        Well, does this mean its Bobbies 2nd offense?  I don't remember him
    getting "dinged" forr it last year..
    
    	Tim
36.122Marinovich = next MontanaELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jun 25 1991 16:2212
    Ahh...the travesty continues....:-)
    
    Reeves proberly loant them a mercedes and offered them season tickets
    to drop all the charges....that scum bag....
    
    >                 -< Carlos = closet Bronco fan ;^^ >-
    
    Ooofff, God that was way below the belt Tim, that's OK though 'cause
    come Sept. 8th I'll be the one smilin, while you'll seriously be
    considering switching loyalties to a real football team :-)
    
    Carlos
36.123Your not speakin' saprano are ya?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Jun 27 1991 12:232
      re- real football team,  you mean the giants or bears, at least
    according to some of their faithfuls;^^
36.124Who's the leader of the pack that's made for you and meELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Jun 28 1991 18:1512
    >                -< Your not speakin' saprono are ya? >-
    
    Tim, it wouldn't matter even if I was speakin' in my best Mickey
    Mouse imitation, the record between our two teams speaks all for
    itself, (I'm not 100% on this but...) I think in the last seven meetings
    between the Raiders and the Donks the Raiders have won six. 6-1
    is an excellent record against your powerful Donks don't you think?
    Heck, even giving the Donks the benefit of the doubt would put the
    Raiders at 5-2, which is still very good, especially considering
    that the Raiders didn't return to their normal form 'til last year.
                          
    Carlos
36.125BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Fri Jun 28 1991 20:0127
>    (I'm not 100% on this but...) I think in the last seven meetings
>    between the Raiders and the Donks the Raiders have won six. 6-1
    
    Well, you're close Carlos.  
    
    90: Raiders, 2-0
    89: 1-1
    88: Raiders, 2-0
    87: Broncos, 2-0
    86: Broncos, 2-0
    85: Raiders, 2-0
    84: Broncos, 2-0
    
    The Raiders don't have 6 of the last 7, but do have 5 of the last 6.
    However, the series is tied 7-7 over the last 7 years, and Denver won 6
    out of 8 from '84 to '87.  The Raiders still have a big lead in this
    overall series, but Denver didn't have a winning record until '75 or
    '76.  From 1977 on, with the exception of '89, one team has swept the
    season series.  And although LA does have the overall lead, since '77
    it's probably very close and Denver might even have a slight lead.  I'd
    have to check.
    
    Joe
    
    P.S.- I haven't included 1991, which will be Denver 2, LA 0    :)
    
    
36.126ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Jun 28 1991 21:347
    Thanks Joe, that's some pretty interesting stuff, amazing how (with
    the '89 exception) they've had a sweep for thirteen of the last
    fourteen years. It also seems to me that the majority of the time,
    whenever these two teams play, the final score is within a touchdown.
    
    Carlos
    
36.127FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Jul 01 1991 11:5342
    The all time series stands 41-19-2 in favor of the Raiders and has gone
    like this:
    
    1960	Split  		1-1
    1961	Split		2-2
    1962	Den 2-0         2-4
    1963	Raid 2-0	4-4 (this year started 9 years of no Denver 
    					wins)
    1964	Raid 1-0-1	5-4-1
    1965	Raid 2-0	7-4-1 (begins string of 14 Raider wins)
    1966	Raid 2-0	9-4-1
    1967	Raid 2-0	11-4-1
    1968	Raid 2-0	13-4-1
    1969	Raid 2-0	15-4-1
    1970	Raid 2-0	17-4-1
    1971	Raid 2-0	19-4-1
    1972	split 		20-5-1
    1973	Raid 1-0-1	21-5-2
    1974	split		22-6-2
    1975	Raid 2-0	24-6-2
    1976	Raid 2-0	26-6-2
    1977	Den 2-1		27-8-2 (Denver wins in playoffs)
    1978	Den 2-0		27-10-2
    1979	Raid 2-0	29-10-2
    1980	Raid 2-0	31-10-2
    1981	Den 2-0		31-12-2
    1982	Raid 1-0	32-12-2 (only 1 game that year - strike)
    1983	Raid 2-0	34-12-2
    1984	Den 2-0		34-14-2
    1985	Raid 2-0	36-14-2
    1986	Den 2-0		36-16-2
    1987	Den 2-0		36-18-2
    1988	Raid 2-0	38-18-2
    1989	split		39-19-2
    1990	Raid 2-0	41-19-2
    
    It's not recent history that's responsible for the wide edge the
    Raiders have in the series, it's really the 1963-1976 time period. 
    Since 1977, the series has been virtually even at 15-13 in favor of the
    Raiders.
    
    John
36.128Thanks John!BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Mon Jul 01 1991 20:291
    
36.129Football season starts FridayBSS::JCOTANCHIt's almost football season!Mon Jul 08 1991 15:5424
    Broncos open training camp Friday.
    
    Elway's back is doing fine, but everyone's keeping their fingers
    crossed that it stays that way.  
    
    There's rumors around that Vance may be traded.  He's certainly
    expendable considering that Sharpe should continue to get better
    (although he is projected to be used mostly at H-back this year), and
    they drafted Curtis Mayfield and that other receiver from Arkansas.  
    However, if Nattiel doesn't show signs of coming back from a couple of
    injury-plagued seasons, he could be the odd man out.
    
    Kenny Walker looked real good in the mini-camp.  The question now isn't
    if he'll make the team, but how much he'll play.
    
    Alphonso Carreker is expected to miss all of training camp because of
    his back problem.
    
    Coaches are so confident in Braxton's ability to come back after his
    knee injury, they will be putting plan B signee Charles Dimry on the 
    right side to compete against Wymon Henderson.
    
    Joe
       
36.130RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Jul 08 1991 18:146
    Joe,,
    
    What's the status of Shawn Moore?
    
    Rich
    
36.131Shawn Moore 3rd string QBOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Remote Selling ServicesMon Jul 08 1991 18:421
the Enver Bronco's finish 7-9 this year cause there is no "D" in Enver. 
36.132COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Jul 11 1991 19:5210
      Back from vacaction, and not much happening here.   Good info John.
    
      Steve Sewell and Braxton signed contracts yesterday.
    
      Brooks might play holdout.  Why?, he says its 'cause he was the
    leading tackler last year.  I just don't see him deserving the $$ that
    he wants.  He still needs to prove himself, and don't be suprised to
    see a big challenge for his job by both of the rookies.
    
       Tim
36.133infoCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jul 15 1991 14:573
      Does anyone have an update on who hasn't signed yet?
    
      Are Humphrey and Atewater still holding out?
36.134BSS::JCOTANCHIt's almost football season!Mon Jul 15 1991 15:076
    Atwater and Humphrey are still holding out.  Outside of those two, only
    unsigned players remaining are Nattiel, 1st-round pick Croel and
    2nd-round pick Johnson.  Clevescum signed their top pick this past
    weekend, so that should help get Croel signed sometime soon.
    
    Joe
36.135Humphrey is a hurtin himselfOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Remote Selling ServicesMon Jul 15 1991 15:4912
Humphrey and Atwater both have 2 years left on the contracts. What is it these 
kids go home for the summer and get STUPID or somethin Denver won 5 games last 
year I don't care if Humphrey and Atwater carried the team 5 wins doesn't mean
more money. 

I tell DEC cause we had a bad year I want MORE MONEY. We got too many greedy  
people in Pro-Sports today. 

Gastom Green looks good but Reeves will have him play H-back or Fullback and 
rely on him to block. That what made himn a plan B singer anyway. 

Jeff 
36.136BSS::JCOTANCHACC notesfile---&gt;hit next unseenMon Jul 15 1991 18:0828
    
>      Brooks might play holdout.  Why?, he says its 'cause he was the
>    leading tackler last year.  I just don't see him deserving the $$ that
>    he wants.  He still needs to prove himself, and don't be suprised to
>    see a big challenge for his job by both of the rookies.
  
    Brooks is back in camp, but won't get any challenge from Croel, because
    Croel will be used strictly as an outside 'backer.  Meanwhile, Traylor
    is an insider.  Croel will battle Tim Lucas for the LOLB position, but
    free agent Jeff Mills enters camp as the starter for that position. 
    
    RE: Riggen
    I also heard Green looked good after a couple workouts, but I have a
    hard time believing that he would be tried at fullback because he's
    only listed at 192 pounds.  I would think they may also use Green as a
    kick returner, because he did quite a bit of that for the Rams, and
    with good success.  
    
    Kenny Walker, who weighed about 240 coming out of Nebraska, is up to
    264.
    
    As for Shawn Moore, he should get quite a bit of playing time in the
    preseason because Denver has 5 games and Kubiak probably won't play in
    the first 2 or 3, at least.  Kubiak is supposed to be back in pads
    August 1st.  Moore will battle Pat Hegarty for the 3rd QB position.
    
    Joe  
 
36.137Thanks fur the infoCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jul 15 1991 19:3414
       Isn't Gaston Green a fumbler?   If my memory serves me,  he seemed
    to run well for the Rams,  but he couldn't hold onto the ball.  Please
    tell me I'm wrong.
    
       Croel should get is butt into camp since the 1st pre-game is only 2
    weeks away.  I'm not worried about Nattiel.  I do agree with Jeff's way
    of thinkin'.
    
       Those 2 guys held out in thier rookie year, and they did get some
    decent contracts,  besides, isn't a contract supposed to be the legal
    way of making someone play?  I see fine thier butts 10k a day!!  That
    would teach 'em.....  How sadistic....
    
    	Tim
36.138but atleast you got a stud mufffin for a QB...AGNT99::CHILDSsign said, Stay Away Fool..Mon Jul 15 1991 22:4012
 Yes Tim Gaston Green he of fine moves and speed is indeed a fumbler better
 yet he's all-world practice player!!! When the real games start he plays
 like RCASO spells...

 wish Denver had more of his type...wait a minute actually they do...

 glad I could help out...

 your pal

 the anti....
36.140HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Jul 16 1991 13:073
       Speaking of HOOT, anyone seen him or the Parrot lately? How they
    doing in the 'real world'?
                                              Denny
36.141GENRAL::WADEBetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6!Tue Jul 16 1991 13:286
    
    MikeC,
    
    	Who is this stud-muffin of a QB you refer to?  ;^)
    
    Claybone
36.142Hoot still spending the TFSO !OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen Remote Selling ServicesTue Jul 16 1991 14:554
Hoot must eat his words cause last I heard Hoot was at a family reunion in 
Ohio. 

Jeff
36.143Call him closet manCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Jul 16 1991 15:409
      Last I heard,  Monty was still a council member in Green Mtn. Falls. 
    I don't know what he really does for a living.  
    
      Gee thanks for the Green info Mike.  RE-1,  I would like to know who
    this stud muffin is too.  If your refering to Biffy,  then that means
    you really do care about him;^  Why don't you admit that you like to
    wear your orange when the donks are playing;^^^^^
    
      Tim 
36.144HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Jul 16 1991 16:074
       I thought the parrot was going to be a fireman when he checked out
    of DEC. Maybe he decided on brain surgery instead. :^)
       Sheesh, we even bust these guys when they're gone. What a crew!
                                          Denny
36.145ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jul 16 1991 17:423
    >         -< but atleast you got a stud muffin for a QB... >-
    
    You probably think Ali-Sheeba is cute too! huh?  :-)
36.146BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Jul 17 1991 09:4210
    Ha ha ha, this is toooooo much.  Monty and Hoot being remembered in the
    Donk note!  Ha ha ha.  :*)
    
    I know, this is where they spent a lot of their noting time, but it
    seems strange that they are remembered here, more than in the Raider
    note.  :*)
    
    lEe
    
    
36.147CAM::WAYHigh Toned Son of a BitchWed Jul 17 1991 11:067
Yes, but Lee, look at it this way.

I'm sure General Sherman is much more remembered in Atlanta than in his
home town.....;^)


'Saw
36.148BSS::JCOTANCHACC notesfile---&gt;hit next unseenWed Jul 17 1991 13:5215
    Juriga has been bothered by back problems lately and will undergo some
    tests today to see if the problems are serious or just something minor. 
    Juriga had been moved to left tackle, so right now that leaves Darrel
    Hamilton as the starting left tackle.
    
    Offensive lineman Nick Subis, this year's 6th round draft pick, hurt
    his knee yesterday and is expected to miss 3 or 4 weeks.  
    
    Kenny Walker has been bothered by a strained hamstring, but returned to
    practice yesterday.  
    
    No new news on holdouts Atwater and Humphrey, or unsigned players
    Croel, Johnson, and Nattiel.
    
    Joe
36.149Go ahead ... hit it.SHALOT::HUNTThings that make you go 'Hmmmm' ...Wed Jul 17 1991 14:1022
 In other ACC news, Duke junior Christian Laettner was named as the
 ACC's Male Athlete Of The Year for his role in leading Duke to the
 NCAA Division 1 basketball championship.    
 
 Laettner had finished 2nd to NC State's Rodney Monroe for the ACC's
 Men's Basketball Player Of The Year award.
 
 Virginia's Dawn Staley was selected as the ACC's Female Athlete Of
 The Year for her role in leading the Lady Cavaliers to a 2nd-place
 finish in the NCAA Women's Basketball Championship.
 
 Florida State officially joined the ACC on 1-Jul-1991 as the ninth
 member of the conference.   They will play a full conference
 basketball schedule in 1991-92 and will join the football race during
 the 1992-93 season.
 
 The ACC also was instrumental in bringing to life a new agreement
 among the Orange, Sugar, Cotton, and Fiesta Bowls.   As of the 1992
 season, the ACC champion will be guaranteed a slot in any one of
 these four top-notch bowl games.
 
 Bob Hunt
36.150GENRAL::WADEBetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6!Wed Jul 17 1991 15:496
    Yo Robert,
    
    	I'm sure Joe didn't mind the ACC news..............except
    	the part about those weenie Virginia Cavaliers!  :^)
    
    Claybone
36.151BSS::JCOTANCHACC notesfile---&gt;hit next unseenThu Jul 18 1991 15:1914
    Hey Bob, thanks for the ACC news...keep it comin'!  I'll tell ya, it
    sure beats that ongoing Dean rathole.  :^)
    
    The Broncos held their first scrimmage last night, and the players who
    impressed were Gaston Green, Shawn Moore, Randy Robbins, Simon
    Fletcher, and Kenny Walker.
    
    Juriga's exams on his back turned out good, so he should be back in
    pads soon.
    
    2nd round pick Reggie Johnson might be signed as early as Friday.
    
    Joe
    
36.152FTMUDG::REEDSutton+Houston=1992NCAAChampsThu Jul 18 1991 15:295
    Joe, I haven't heard anything about Curtis Mayfield for a while.  Is
    he still around?
    
    Cowboy
    
36.153BSS::JCOTANCHACC notesfile---&gt;hit next unseenThu Jul 18 1991 15:376
    Curtis Mayfield is still around, but I haven't heard anything about
    he's doing.  If nobody gets traded, he will probably have a tough time
    making the roster unless he can beat out 4th round pick Derek Russell
    from Arkansas.
    
    Joe
36.154COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Jul 19 1991 16:051
      I guess DAnny is impressed with Russell, so watch out Nattiel.
36.155Four Bronco's arrested after fight !OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Mon Jul 22 1991 18:438
4 Denver Bronco's were arrested Friday night outside a Greely Talc 
establishment the "Armory". 
I think it was something about the 1st annual "Gerald Perry lets get into 
trouble night". 

The only player I remember is Melvin Bratton RB. 

Jeff
36.156GENRAL::WADEBetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6!Mon Jul 22 1991 20:4110
    
    	Sorry Jeff, but the Armory doesn't quite qualify as a
    	TALC establishment.  It's a part of the same chain of
    	bars as Meadow Muffins/O'Furry's.
    
    	Wasn't there a time when Pat Blowin'(tm) was looking for
    	meaner players (ie always in trouble?).  I guess the
    	old saying about being careful what you wish for applies.
    
    	Claybone
36.157OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Mon Jul 22 1991 21:076
 It's a part of the same chain of
    	bars as Meadow Muffins/O'Furry's.
    

Clay; 
Places with names like this aren't TALC joints ????
36.158As I know itCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jul 22 1991 21:5717
      Alton Montgomery was the only player to get hurt from my
    understanding.  From what Bratton said,  some guy starting talking
    %&$* to Alton, and finally they decided to take it outside.
    
      This guy appearently threw a beer bottle as hard as he could at
    Alton, so then Alton raise is arm to block it, and thus the bottle
    breaking on his wrist area and then cutting him fairly deep.
    
      Then I guess some pushing and shoving and "what not" happened until
    the cops got there.  I don't know who the other 2 players were.
    
      Alton will be sidelined for ~ a week.
    
    
      Alright guys,  what does TALC stand for?
    
    		Tim
36.159GENRAL::WADEBetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6!Tue Jul 23 1991 12:477
    
    	Jake holds the trademark on T.A.L.C.  I don't think
    	those bars qualify for the T and A portion of TALC.
    	I guess we need a definition from the source.  How
    	'bout it Jake?
    
    	Claybone
36.160BLAM it on a DOG fan !OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Tue Jul 23 1991 13:4211
The real truth. 

Some Clevescum fan was moaning and groaning about the Bronco's beating them 
repeatedly to get to the Stupid Bowl. Alton Montgomery quietly reminded 
him that he was SWEATING profusly. The guy then obviosly in a steroid induced 
fit of violent behavior threw a bottle at Montgomery causing Alton to SWEAT and 
behave like a guy on the JUICE. Melvin Bratton happened to be cruisin by and 
witnessed his teamate bleeding so he got out of his car and proceeded to 
beat-up a man in blue. 2 other players were also sweating and cursing. 

Jeff
36.161BSS::JCOTANCHTue Jul 23 1991 13:5419
    Montgomery received 13 stitches on his arm from being hit by the
    bottle, but he practiced yesterday.  The other 2 players involved
    besides Montgomery and Bratton were Michael Brooks and Ronnie
    Haliburton.
    
    The Broncos had another scrimmage on Saturday and Gaston Green did very
    well again.  That was their last major scrimmage before the Lion game.
    
    Shawn Moore may not play in Saturday's game because of the knee he
    injured in practice last week.
    
    Bronco preseason schedule: (All times are Mountain)
    July 27  Detroit (at Canton)  10:30 am
    Aug. 2   INDY                  7:00 pm
    Aug. 7   @ San Fran            7:00 pm
    Aug. 19  MIAMI                 6:00 pm
    Aug. 23  @ Phoenix             8:30 pm
    
    Joe
36.162CAM::WAYHigh Toned Son of a BitchTue Jul 23 1991 13:5614
While Jake may hold the tm on TALC, the final two letters originated with
me.

T.A.L.C stands for Titles, Acquisitions, Liens and Contracts.

Titles and Acquisitions are self-explanatory.

Liens are LEGally binding,

Contracts, are, well, figure it out.....


hth,
'Saw
36.163BSS::JCOTANCHTue Jul 23 1991 14:516
    Forgot to put in the holdout/signing info.  2nd round pick Reggie
    Johnson and Ricky Nattiel signed contracts and were in camp last
    Friday.  Only unsigned player remaining is Croel; no news on Atwater or
    Humphrey.
    
    Joe
36.164Fishin' anyone?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Jul 24 1991 18:0813
      I think they are dis-respectful.  They are both going to make $600k
    plus this year (if my memory serves me).  They were all-pro last year,
    but give it a rest.  Heck even Elway has class not to hold out.
    
       Well any predictions for this weekend?
    
      Does Detroit still use the run-shoot?  If so, then I think it will 
    be an offensive battle.
    
      Of course it don't matter who wins,  but I think the Donks will
    prevail.
    
    	Tim
36.165ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 24 1991 20:3516
    >Well any predictions for this weekend?
    
    Miami over the Bears - Miami is gonna be hard to stop this year!
    
    Broncs over the Lions- I know, it's a shocker, me picking the broncs,
                           but I figure it's only pre-season, and Sanders
                           is probably not gonna play, so what the heck!
    
    Raiders over Niners -  Another shocker huh? The niner's will see
                           what a mistake they made not protecting Lott,
                           and Craig.
    
    Eagle over the Bills - No comments.
    
    
    Carlos                       
36.166FYIBSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSThu Jul 25 1991 00:0538
    As a public service to the Bronco fans, here's a run-down from various
    NFL sources on Mike Croel, LB, Nebraska, #1 pick of the Broncos:
    
    
    "He's a great player.  When he decides to get it, he can be getting it
    in about the second step.  He can haul ass."  -Reed Johnson, Denver
    Broncos director of player personnel
    
    "I don't have any problem with his instincts.  He's not Broderick
    Thomas coming out, but he's not far behind him."  -Tom Braatz, Packers
    
    "Athletically, he's outstanding.  But they walk him off in coverage
    alot there.  He can go a whole game and you don't even know he's on the
    field."  -Dick Corrick, Oilers
    
    "In terms of making plays that make the nightly news, no.  Not that
    type.  And not a real big guy.  But he can run, he can blitz, he can be
    used in coverage, he plays the run well."  -Ron Hughes, Detroit Lions
    directory of player personnel
    
    "He's not as big as Pat Swilling.  He's like Cornelius Bennett.  If you
    have to line up and throw the ball, he's going to be in your face.  If
    you have to line up and run the ball, your back is going to have a
    little room to run.  Great kid."  -Tom Boisture, Giants
    
    "He's not Derrick Thomas, but could he give you some of the same
    things?  I don't see why he couldn't.  He is a good an athlete as I've
    ever seen at linebacker."  -Charley Casserly, Redskins
    
    
    "I think he's going to do nothing in the NFL.  I think he's the most
    non-instinctive football player I've ever seen."  -Anonymous (NFL
    personnel director)
    
    "Not great instints.  But he's got the speed to make up for a little
    bit of late reaction."  -Dick Steinberg, Jets.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.167BSS::JCOTANCHThu Jul 25 1991 15:4322
    Tim,
    I'm not positive about this, but I believe Atwater is only making
    around $300K and is something like the 5th or 6th highest paid player
    on the defense.  If that's the case he does deserve more, but I agree
    that he should honor his current contract.  He will be rewarded
    accordingly when this one runs out.
    
    As for preseason, I think the average fan takes too much stock in his
    team winning or losing.  I watch a preseason with a totally different
    mindset than I watch a regular season game.  In preseason I like to see
    how the first units look, how rookies and newcomers perform, and how
    different combinations of players work, with winning just an afterthought. 
    And what a lot of people might not realize is the teams are playing 
    preseason games (especially the 1st couple) with a primary goal not of 
    winning but of evaluating young players instead.  It's not really until 
    the last preseason game that coaches are fine-tuning their teams for the
    regular season, which is why by that last game the first units usually
    play at least 3 quarters.  If Denver wins, fine; if they lose, big
    deal.  Now come regular season, turn up the intensity about 10 levels,
    and it's not *how* they play the game, but whether they win or lose.
    
    Joe
36.168Thanks Glenn!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Jul 25 1991 20:367
      I agree with you Joe.  It is to evaluate the players.
    
      I hope to see good things from Kenny Walker.  Denver still needs alot
    of help at pass rushing.  Hopefully a corner back will show up, other
    than Braxton, thats if he is healthy.
    
    	Tim
36.169BSS::JCOTANCHFri Jul 26 1991 16:5315
    Reeves said Shawn Moore will play extensively in tomorrow's game. 
    Elway will see action for about 15-20 plays.
    
    Gaston Green will start at tailback, and Robert Perryman will split
    time with Bratton at fullback; Perryman will start.
    
    These guys won't play because of injuries: Vance Johnson, Derek
    Russell, Alphonso Carreker, Gary Kubiak, Jim Juriga, Nick Subis, and
    Keith Traylor.
    
    Here's some of the players I'll be most interested in watching: Moore,
    Gaston Green, Greg Lewis, Jeff Mills (who will be playing where Croel
    would be, LOLB), Reggie Johnson, Braxton, and Kenny Walker.
    
    Joe
36.170ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Jul 26 1991 19:255
    What's the deal with Crawford Ker, is he anticipated as a starter?
    I think he was a solid pick up for the Donks, I also think that
    Perryman's gonna help out alot blocking for Humph....
    
    Carlos
36.171Watch out Gerald, here come BrattonCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Jul 26 1991 20:297
      I don't know anything about Ker.  I have not heard his name mentioned
    yet, until now.   What position does he play?
    
      Perryman is a "wait and see" kinda guy IMO.   Wasn't he a slug for
    the Patriots?
    
         Tim
36.172Perryman = Pats castoffTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Mon Jul 29 1991 13:067
re: Perryman

Pats dumped him last year because they thought he was "going thru the motions", 
and not giving his all.  When you're 1-15 I would imagine it is tough to stay in
the game at practice, but jeeze, you only play once a week.

=Bob=
36.173Tidbits from the glorified scrimmageBSS::JCOTANCHMon Jul 29 1991 14:5114
    Pretty bland game, especially the 2nd half.  Shawn Moore looked very good
    for his first outing.  He showed good poise staying in the pocket. 
    Green ran the ball well, but I wasn't too impressed with Greg Lewis,
    although he did show good 2nd efforts.   Kenny Walker was
    disappointing, not even getting close to the Lions' QB's.  OLB Jeff
    Mills was in on a lot of plays and had 2 sacks.  Offensive line,
    especially left tackle, needs some work.  Michael Young remains
    Denver's best posession receiver.  Dimry may have been the one beaten
    on Detroit's 2nd TD, but he didn't get any help from the safeties, and
    he simply underestimated Campbell's speed.  Speaking of Campbell, it
    was nice to see the ex-Buff have a great game.  The Broncos miss
    Atwater much more than Humphrey at this point.
    
    Joe
36.174HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxes!Mon Jul 29 1991 15:095
       If Perryman's with the Donks now he's also a Dallas castoff. He was
    with them lasted year.
                                           Denny
    
    
36.175COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jul 29 1991 15:5913
      Didn't really catch much of this game.  Didn't even know it was on
    until I finished mowing the jungle called my lawn.  I saw enough of Pat
    Hagerty, and I wasn't impressed.  I agree with Shawn Moore looking
    good.  I believe Dimry was slow, from the couple plays I saw him in.
    
      I didn't notice much of a pass rush.  If there isn't pressure on the
    QB, then any CB or Safety will be burned given the time.
    
      I will probably watch this Friday's game, but then again?  Reeves
    should have time to help them with their small inefficiencies (sp?).
    
    
         Go Broncos....watta team!!!
36.176Jeff Dahmers for head coachOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Mon Jul 29 1991 18:1411
All I need to see was the offense taking the opening kickoff to the Detroit 4
then use three plays up the middle and off tackle for a 18yd FG. I gots' the 
shakes from the 86 Superbowl next I see Dan Reeves pull the first team and 
put in a guy Hagerty I thought doug Flutie would be better. By this time I'm 
looking to my wife to take the kids this is gonna be a loooooonnnnnggggggg year.

Denver has been using parachutes on the players to make them run faster...

Seems to work great for the defense. 

Jeff
36.177O'well, its only meaninglessCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Jul 29 1991 21:1216
      re-1
    
      Jeff,  Tell me the offense didn't do that..  If different plays
    aren't ran,  then we will see the same ole stuff,  and your right,  it
    will be a long season.
    
      Did you see the one stat that showed NO tight end caught a TD last
    year?   I remember 2 that Kay dropped in the endzone,  and in both
    cases it was a go ahead score.  Paul Green was cut last week.  He was
    better than the other back-up slug they had.
    
      Hopefully this Johnson guy will work out, 'cause we know that old
    Clarence will be arrested before seasons end.  
    
    		Ti
    
36.178ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Aug 01 1991 20:225
    Read in the paper that some FB named Reggie Rivers (?) or something
    like that has been moving his way up the Donk depth chart to #2
    behind Perryman, surpassing Bratton and Sewell. 
    
    Carlos
36.179TRADE RUMORSOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Thu Aug 01 1991 20:256
Seems that Denver is shopping around Mel Bratton he is 4th on the FB depth chart

Vance Johnson and Ricky Natteil are also being shopped around.

RThe only player Denver is getting calls on is Bobby Humphrey. 

36.180ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Thu Aug 01 1991 20:343
    
    Hope they're looking for some defensive help, cause it shore would
    be a shame to let the Chiefs and the Raiders go at it all alone...
36.181Denver misses Perry ON the fieldBSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 01 1991 20:4411
    If Juriga's back doesn't get better soon, the position they'll need
    help at most is left tackle.  Giants' scouts were at the HOF game
    checking out some Bronco talent in case Denver is interested in acquiring 
    a tackle from them.
    
    RE Rivers
    He is one of the biggest surprises of camp, if not the biggest.  He's a
    first-year free agent from SW Texas State.  I don't think there's room
    for him on the roster though, with all the backs Denver has.
    
    Joe
36.182COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Aug 01 1991 22:4726
      This is the 1st I have heard of Rivers.  Of course I haven't been
    into the Broncos scene as much as others.   If this Rivers guy is
    proving to be a great talet,  then get rid of Bratton.  Bratton did
    slow down towards the end of last season, regardless of the W/L record.
    
      Bratton seems to be going down the same road as Jeff Alexander did 2
    years ago.  Alexander started out great, then ended up having drinking
    problems as well as gaining weight.
    
      I guess Reeves is saying that if Humphrie doesn't get to camp, that
    they might consider a trade.  I think Denver would be losing a great RB
    if this happened. It's been since Floyd Little and Armstrong days that
    Denver hasn't had a "real" RB.  Sure Winder ran for alot of yards,  but
    he was slow and didn't have the moves.
    
      I don't think they should trade Bobby to get an OT.  The OT might not
    work out, unless its a Chris Hinton or Jumbo Elliot type.
    
      It sounds like the LB Mills might win a starting job.  He seems to be
    immpressing the staff.
    
      Carlos,  do you really think the Faiders are going to have as good a
    year as they did last year?  Don't kid yourself;^^
    
    
    	Tim
36.183tough to play "D" from behind bars...MAXWEL::CHILDSFrankie &amp; Dinz-Love Story 2 1/2Fri Aug 02 1991 10:4915
>> RThe only player Denver is getting calls on is Bobby Humphrey. 

 not true Jeff, why I called just the other day to ask them if they
 were still pay Mr. Ed 2 million...

 I needed a laugh.....

 you better take him early cause if you don't I will he ought to rack 
 up BIG BIG numbers against all them 5th place teams...

 course his defesne will give up more...

 mike

36.184Tonight HORSE BOWL ?OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Fri Aug 02 1991 13:247
Denver takes on Indianapolis tonight Expect Dickerson to get about 50 yds in 
the first quarter then the stiffs will fill in for the rest of the game. 

I expect to see Johnson, Nattiel and Bratton to get some time. Shawn Moore
will play most of the second half. 

BORING !!!
36.185GENRAL::WADEBetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6!Fri Aug 02 1991 14:177
    
    	Actually Jeff, I'm very interested to see how McCloughan
    	and VanderPoel (sp?) do for the Colts.  They are ex CU
    	Buffs BTW.  But you knew that.  Hail, even Kwak knew
    	that.  Just ask 'Saw.
    
    	Claybone
36.186HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxes!Fri Aug 02 1991 15:073
       Where's Jill 'the excited'? She should be getting wound up for
    another Donk season.
                                    Denny
36.187GENRAL::WADEBetterJudgedBy12ThanCarriedBy6!Fri Aug 02 1991 15:315
    
    	Wait'll they win a couple in a row Denny.  I'm
    	a great straight man eh?
    
    	Claybone ;^)
36.188The absolute best seasonOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Fri Aug 02 1991 16:138
The Donks could win 8 games this year if they go 4-4 in the division I would 
be very impressed. 

I expect Elway to get hurt on a blind side sack. Humphrey will show then blow 
out a knee 4 games into the season. Atwater will hold out for the gold plating 
off the Denver Capital dome... "He does deserve it". 

Jeff
36.189Horse bowl...Thats a good one Jeff;6COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Aug 02 1991 17:4513
      I'm not sure if I will be in town to watch this one.  Hopefully
    Reeves will play rookies since we already know what the vets can do.   
    Let the rookies play the whole game, that way by game 3 or 4 of
    preseason, they should be more "primed" to show their real talents.
    
      I beleive its hard for these 1st year (on the squad) guys to show
    all.
    
      Where is Jack and Jill?
    
    		Tim
    
      P.S.  Smile Cacti.....
36.190COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Aug 05 1991 15:5311
      Well I did indeed watch most of the game Friday.   1st string O
    looked "normal".  I thought that the defense looked fairly good.  Its
    hard to look bad when the other teams ball carrier can't hold onto the
    ball.
    
      I think Lang will work out as long as he doesn't get to greedy to
    pick off passes.
    
      I still like Shawn Moore.....
    
    	Tim
36.192BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 05 1991 17:1520
    Defense did look pretty good Friday night, especially Fletcher and
    Brooks.  Whether it's Croel, Mills, or Lucas as the LOLB, this should
    be one of the league's best set of 'backers....Kenny Walker was getting
    a little heat on the QB....Gaston Green showed his speed on that TD run,
    and he might have had a couple more long runs but lost his footing. 
    Shawn Moore looked real good - Hegarty's as good as gone....If Sharpe is 
    going to stay at H-Back, he's going to have to improve his
    blocking....Reggie Johnson had a bad groin pull in the game, and is
    expected to miss the rest of preseason. :(
    
    Atwater was back in camp yesterday and will start against the Niners. 
    Of the 3 holdouts, he was missed the most.  I also heard that Croel may 
    be signed before the end of the week.
    
    Kubiak may see some action on Wednesday night.
    
    Right now, it's looking like Bratton won't make the team.
    
    
    Joe
36.193ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Aug 05 1991 17:164
    Atwater signed this weekend, the Donks just have Humphrey and Croel
    left to sign. 
    
    Carlos
36.194COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Aug 05 1991 18:2113
      Atwater will have $34,500 in fines to pay.  Now was it worth it? 
    Unless not practicing for 2+weeks is worth that kinda cash.
    
      We will see about Humphrey.  If he comes back, and Green as backup, 
    well they would compliment each other well.
    
      I think the FB is still up in they air.  Rivers didn't seem to do
    much, that I saw anyway.
    
      I agree that the linebacking should be better this year than in the
    past ???  years......
    
    	Tim
36.195BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 05 1991 19:1619
>      Atwater will have $34,500 in fines to pay.  Now was it worth it? 
>    Unless not practicing for 2+weeks is worth that kinda cash.
    
    FWIW Tim, do ya really think Steve will end up paying that fine?  I would
    bet it will either be waived or tacked onto his salary as part of the
    deal in him returning to camp.  34K is nothing to NFL franchises who
    are used to paying $1 mil for something like a signing bonus.
    
    Back on the field, Nattiel was returning punts the other night.  What
    Reeves is trying to do here is get someone to return punts who will
    also contribute to the team in other areas.  Bottom line: could spell
    the end for Kevin Clark.  BTW, I thought Nattiel did a pretty good
    returning punts, except for that one he fumbled while trying to make a
    sliding catch - he never should have touched that one.
    
    Joe 
    
    
 
36.196COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Aug 06 1991 16:1419
      Atwaters 34k problem will be put towards his insurance policy.  So
    yeh, he doesn't pay it.  Bowlen gave into that request, but didn't on
    the salary bump.
    
      Reeves is probably trying Nattiel at returns 'cause he doesn't want
    to cut all the talent that he has at recieving, IMO.  I thought Kevin
    Clark did a great job of returning kicks last year, once he was brought
    in.  If I remember correctly, he led the AFC in yards/return at one
    point, then ended up getting hurt.  He was/is fun to watch.  He isn't
    that great of a nickel back though...
    
      Some no name was cut yesterday.  He was from Puerto Rico (?) and
    never played college ball.  REeves says he had alot of talent and hopes
    this guy finds a job in Canada or WLAF.
    
       I hope these other 2 guys get to camp so the coaches won't have any
    doubts has to starters.
    
    	Tim
36.197San Fran 24, Denver 6BSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 08 1991 14:5624
    It doesn't seem like anybody wants to talk about it, but there was a
    game last night.  The 1st-team offense looked terrible, a combination
    of poor run-blocking, lack of production from Green (6 carries for 10
    yards), Elway not being sharp, and probably most of all numerous drops
    by receivers.  The bad news that means something though is all the
    injuries: Vance sprained a knee, Fletcher spained an ankle, Sharpe
    got a concussion, Scott Curtis sprained an ankle, and Kip Corrington
    sprained an ankle.  The good news is that only Vance's injury is
    serious - he may miss a few weeks.
    
    1st-team defense looked pretty good, although the Niners hurt
    themselves quite a bit with holding penalties.  Brooks played a great
    game and Warren Powers also looked pretty good.  Rookie Kenny Walker
    secured himself a spot on the roster with 2 sacks and a forced fumble.
    
    Both Elway and Kubiak were calling their own plays, something Reeves
    said may last into the regular season.  
    
    4th-round pick Derek Russell also looked pretty good.
    
    Denver doesn't play again until a week from Monday against Miami.
    
     
    Joe
36.198BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSThu Aug 08 1991 20:176
    You have to be kidding me Joe.  I though Russell (WR - #5) looked
    terrible.  Did he have a catch?  I saw him drop a thousand balls. 
    
    Other than that, I pretty much agree with you.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.199BSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 08 1991 20:386
    Glenn,
    Russell had 3 catches and looked good returning kickoffs.  Yea he had 
    some drops, but who didn't last night.
    
    Joe
    
36.200The game just plain Stunk up Candlestick.OURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Fri Aug 09 1991 16:1911
Getting beat 24-6 didn't bother me as mush as Denver Played 1st team offense
and Defense in the first half and the 9'ers played the first team for a single 
series and the starting QB didn't even play.
 At the half the score was 10-3shoulda been 13-3 S.F was relaxed and played
 with the belief that this is a preseason scrimage game. Denver was playing 
for "revenge of 55-10" they lookedbad they couldn't execute they played soft 
by trying not to give up the big play. 
As a Bronco fan I wasn't disappointed but real early this year I know that the 
class of the NFL is still in the NFC. 

Jeff
36.201COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Aug 09 1991 17:5915
       It was a very bad game for the offense as a whole.   Denver needs to
    learn how to minimize that 5 yard pass.   9'rs Beat them consistently
    with this.
    
      You have to admire the man-man coverage on the 9'rs defense.  Even
    when a donk reciever would catch the ball,  there was always a def back
    there to put a hit on them.  Maybe Wymon should take lessons.
    
      The Miami game should be interesting. Marino will eat there lunch if
    things don't get better.
    
      Miami's D isn't that great,  so look for Denver to find the endzone, 
    which is something they seem to have problems with.
    
    	Tim
36.202Tastes great....Less filling!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Aug 09 1991 19:3615
    >...the class of the NFL is still in the NFC.
    
    I disagree, I think there is both classy and sad-dog teams in both 
    conferences. Certainly you can not say that the Falcons or the Bucs
    are classy teams 'tho they're in the NFC, and likewise I don't think
    you'd consider teams like KC, Buffalo, Houston, and such to be without
    class.  Maybe you mean that the best in the NFC is better than the
    best in the AFC, but even that don't wash when you consider how
    teams like the Raiders, Dolphins and Steelers did -vs- the NFC in
    the last twenty years, or even better, just during the last ten
    years when the NFC was supposed to be superior. Maybe I'm being
    to critical here, but I for one, don't think that the class of the
    NFL is in the NFC ....only.
    
    Carlos  
36.203CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RMon Aug 12 1991 12:106
    I think that the statement means that the only really outstanding
    teams today are in the NFC.  If so, I believe it.  The only really
    outstanding teams in the last 5 years have been in the NFC.  Despite
    the fact that LA and Miami had some excellent teams in the first
    half of the 80's, there have been no really oustanding teams in the
    AFC in the last 5 years.
36.204Hey, where's the bucks ?!?FTMUDG::REEDOKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTERMon Aug 12 1991 12:2810
    Denver is gonna have to spend some $$$ on their better players if
    they expect them stay around--Humphrey in particular.  He's making
    $300,000/year while Barry Sanders is getting ready to sign for 
    $2M/year.  Humphrey's stats last year were close to Sanders, too.
    Of course if Humphrey was pulling in $2M/year then Elway's feelings
    would be hurt, so they'd have to throw another Million/year to him.
    
    Look for countless RBs holding out before next season, BTW.
    
    Cowboy
36.205BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 12 1991 16:3318
    Some of the trade rumors involving Humphrey:
    
    -Humphrey to SF for a package including some offensive lineman who can
    play any position on the line but is best suited at guard.  Not what
    Denver needs.
    
    -Humphrey to SF for NT Michael Carter and a #1 draft pick.  
    
    -Humphrey to Tampa for rookie tackle Charles McRae.  They said on the
    news last night that Tampa turned this offer down.
    
    If the Broncos are seriously interested in trading Humphrey, they want to 
    get a starter and a 1st-round pick.
    
    Croel was signed Friday.
    
    Joe
    
36.206Who knows, butCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Aug 12 1991 18:1012
      Denver would be dumb to try and get Mcrae anyway.  He is unsigned, so
    what is the difference between him and Humphrey?
    
      Humphrey will show.  He can't afford the fines for all season, and he
    also knows that he is the starter when he returns.   Green is ok, but
    he is to inconsistant to have a 1,000 yard season.  Plus if he was
    starter and got hurt,  who would back him up?  I think Green would
    be/is a good backup for Bobby.
    
      The other guys in camp aren't at the "pro" level yet, IMO.
    
          Tim
36.207They better get an all-pro for himGENRAL::WADEMon Aug 12 1991 19:117
    
    	I can't believe those idjits are considering trading BH.
    	The Donks finally get a premier RB and two years later
    	they wanna get rid of him cuz he wants a pay raise (that
    	he deserves IMHO).  Sheesh.........
    
    	Claybone
36.208COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Aug 13 1991 22:157
      I had a Faider fan come and tell me that he had heard Vance has been
    traded.  Does anyone have knowledge of this?
    
      I think that would be a good move as long as they get OL or DL help. 
    Other than that,  forget it!
    
    	Tim
36.209CNTROL::CHILDSWay to go John DalyTue Aug 13 1991 23:198
 I thought that Vancine was going to jail????

 oh poor Johnny poor Johnny but atleast he's got his first excuse...

 ;^)

mike
36.210Broncos are in tougher division than PittCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Aug 14 1991 14:376
     Excuse for what?   With Vance out until after the Sep.1st opener, 
    then this should give Russel a chance to show something.
    
      Elway doesn't make excuses, if he plays bad, he will say so. 
    Besides,  he doesn't have to have Mommy there to comfort him when he
    loses,  unlike Boobsy....A pure momma's BOY! ;^^
36.211ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Wed Aug 14 1991 16:1615
    >Elway doesn't make excuses,
    
    He doesn't need to, what with all the excuses you Donk fans make for 
    him....:-)       
    
    >...if he plays bad, he will say so.
    
    You make him sound like a combination of John Wayne, Abe Lincoln,
    and George Washington all in one. Truth is tho, if Elway isn't the
    biggest whining, sniveling, crybaby, 'momma's boy' QB in the league,
    I don't know who is. Now if you wanna talk about manly QB's, take
    Jay Schroeder........why he's even got Geo. Washington's receding
    hairline ......:-)                                          
    
    Carlos
36.212All this talk, its getting close to real gamesCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Aug 15 1991 15:098
      Shroeder also has washington's teeth...Biffs are real...real big.
    
      Carlos,  you know Elway is god compared to your Qb.  Speaking of
    crying,  didn't shroeder scream until the Redskins finally dumped him?
    
      WE will see how they fair this year.
    
    	Tim
36.213ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Fri Aug 16 1991 18:469
    The Donks play against the Dolphins this Monday night. Should be
    a pretty good game even if it's only pre-season. I think these last
    two pre-season games will be good indicators of what we can expect
    from most teams come the first game of the regular season. I also
    think the Dolphins are gonna have a good year this year (although
    I wasn't expecting Smith to get hurt), and if the Raiders don't
    make it to the big dance then the Dolphins will. JMHO
    
    Carlos
36.214GENRAL::WADEFri Aug 16 1991 20:2910
    
    Carlos,
    
    	I doubt this game will be a good indicator.  Miami has
    	something like 9 holdouts (7 of whom are starters).  They
    	also have ~3 starters out due to injury.  Now, if Denver
    	were to lose this game big time, you just might have an
    	indicator......
    
    Claybone
36.215Marino is going to be rich!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Aug 20 1991 18:1413
      Denver finally found the endzone last night.  The 1st qtr was
    terrible on the offensive side,  but then it was turned around.
    
      I would have liked to see Shawn Moore play instead of Kubiak.
    
      I think the Denver linebackers are looking great.  The DL still needs
    a impact player.  Bench Wymon Henderson.  He is a slug!  I think Li lo
    Lang can do better than this toast of a player.
    
      Elway looked normal.  Humphrey is needed.  Hamilton had 4 penalties,
    and Dave Widell had 2.  4 of the six were for early starts.
    
          Tim
36.216FTMUDG::REEDOKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTERTue Aug 20 1991 19:044
    Anyone count the number of sacks in that game?  I've never seen
    Marino hit the turf that much!
    
    Cowboy
36.217Denver 21, Miami 13BSS::JCOTANCHLarry, Curly, and ModellTue Aug 20 1991 19:3239
    RE: Cowboy
    I think Denver only got 1 sack on Marino, but they were pressuring him
    all night.  That's the thing about Marino: he holds onto the ball and
    isn't afraid to be hit after he releases the ball, which is much of the
    reason for his incredibly low number of sacks over the years.  Not to
    take anything away from Miami's offensive line, mind you.
    
    RE: Tim
    Yes, I also feel the 'backers are looking great, especially Brooks. 
    Croel didn't have alot of tackles but seemed to always be around the
    action or pressuring Marino.
    
    Elsewhere, a good performance as a whole, although Miami is without
    some key players due to holdouts and injuries.  I also agree with you
    Tim that they need Humphrey.  The running game was okay last night, and
    Lewis undoubtedly locked up his spot on the final roster.  I'm still
    worried about the offensive line - Hamilton either needs to come around
    or they need to acquire a left tackle pronto.  Defense continues to
    play very well and with alot of intensity.
    
    Other notes:
    
    Russell dropped a couple key passes, one of which may have gone the
    distance.  He should still make the team though.
    
    I'm not convinced Reggie Rivers will make this team, but he will
    probably survive today's cuts.
    
    The defense appears to be back to their aggressive style of 2 years
    ago.
    
    Veterans who may be in trouble IMO are Andre Townsend, Melvin Bratton,
    Chris Verhulst, Blake Ezor, Rick Dennison, and maybe even Steve Sewell.
    
    Kevin Clark remains a big question.  Does Denver keep a guy who
    contributes very little in the defensive backfield but may be the best
    return man they have?
    
    Joe
36.218ahh... ready for the 1991 season now!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Aug 20 1991 19:492
    
    Have the Donks ever won an NFL Championship...?
36.219GENRAL::WADETue Aug 20 1991 20:048
    
    	No, but our record in AFC champeenship games is perfect
    	wouldn't YOU say?  :-)
    
    	Oh, and btw, our resident fascist(sp?) moderator has set
    	up a note where we can carry on so to speak.  Thanks Mac! ;^)
    
    	Claybone
36.220FMCSSE::BROWNCan you Bupp the Pupp?Tue Aug 20 1991 20:078
    
    re-2
      Icepork!!
    
    	Have the Brownspots ever beaten the Donkey's in a AFC champeenship?
    
    Cadzilla
    
36.221alright! Iceman's back!HAVASU::HEISERGod knows BoTue Aug 20 1991 20:251
    
36.222Humphrey a Bronco?ROULET::LAFOUNTAINEWed Aug 21 1991 02:565
    Humphrey seems to be up on the block. USA Today said that the Falcons 
    had spoke with Reeves and Reeves was qouted on this. The only catch was
    that Dan said they didn't offer enough. How is the rumor mill on the
    49ers picking him up? 
    			The Rookie
36.223only the donkeys... CNTROL::CHILDSTake me to Roslyn's Cafe PleaseWed Aug 21 1991 11:3710
  Here's a guy who comes in gains 2300+ yards, catches and blocks and the
  Donks don't have a place for him? I guess Smellway can't stand to share
  the spotlight and went crying to Blowland (tm). They finally get a running
  game and now they're going to give it away....

  For the rest of the league's sake I hope if they do trade him they atleast
  don't send him to the Niners...

  mike
36.224Broncos cut to 60BSS::JCOTANCHWed Aug 21 1991 12:5725
    Waived:
    
    Scott Beavers, G
    Matt McCall, T
    Melvin Bratton, FB
    Blake Ezor, TB
    Tony Alford, TB
    Tim Stallworth, WR
    Curtis Mayfield, WR
    Ernest Priester, WR
    Norris Hanes, WR
    Chris Verhulst, TE
    Pat Hegarty, QB
    Rick Dennison, LB
    Rollin Putzier, NT
    Doug Jacobs, DE
    Fred Foggie, CB
    Tracy Bennett, K
    
    Jim Juriga was placed on IR and is out for the season.  Alphonso
    Carreker was placed on the physically unable to perform list and can be
    activated after six games.
    
    
    Joe
36.225GENRAL::WADEWed Aug 21 1991 13:0113
    
    	I agree Mikey (except for the part about Godway crying to
    	Blowin(tm)).  However, there is a little more to the story.
    	The Donks have a policy about not renegotiating a contract 
    	that has more than a year left (Humphrey's has two).  They
    	have never bent on this rule and I kinda doubt they will
    	for him.  Look for BH to either come to camp with a lil'
    	promise whispered in his ear for a new contract before
    	next season (ala Steve Atwater) or to sit the whole year.
    
    	We'll see how things go when he starts missing paychecks......
    
    	Claybone
36.226CNTROL::CHILDSTake me to Roslyn's Cafe PleaseWed Aug 21 1991 15:388
 In this day and age of a contract ain't worth the ink it's printed on it's
 a stupid rule. But hey Pat famous for being stupid.....

 and you're wrong about Smellway...look at his track record he's been a cryer
 since day 1.........

 mike
36.227you got it all wrongGENRAL::WADEWed Aug 21 1991 15:509
    
    Mikey,
    
    	I think you're confused by BBJ's facial expressions.  You see,
    	if you combine his big teefus with the squint (due to him
    	looking at the Donk sideline and thus into the sun), it appears
    	he's crying.  :^)  Glad to be able to help........
    
    Claybone
36.228At least Biffs worth the money he's paidCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Aug 21 1991 16:2612
       Glad to see Hagerty gone.  It seems that the drafties are being held
    onto, until next week anyway.
    
       Mike,  quit squealling will ya?  At least the broncos have a QB. 
    Pitt is still searching for one.  Maybe they should get Shroeder;^  Of
    course the squealer games wouldn't be the same without boobsie's mom
    plastered on the screen.
    
      Maybe her and uncle Al have rights to showing there faces 20 times
    during a game.  I would hate to watch a faider vs squealer game;^
    
    		Tim
36.229reality check for donko fansCNTROL::CHILDSTake me to Roslyn's Cafe PleaseWed Aug 21 1991 16:3923
 Here's the write up and rankings in my official fantasy football special 
 magazine:

 #9 Bubby Brister: The Steelers finally started to get their offense to click
    last year and Bubby was the main beneficiary. The fifth year pro had his
    finest NFL season, throwing for 2,725 yards and 20 touchdowns. In the two
    previous years, Brister had thrown just 20 TD's while rushing for six. Last
    year he stayed in the pocket more and didn't rush for any td's. Brister is
    maturing as a quarterback, which is good news for the Steelers and good news
    for fantasy owners. Brister should again approach his 20 td season again 
    this year.

  #18 John Elway: Elway's number keep getting worse and worse. His 15 td's last
      year were his lowest since 1983 and the fourth time in the last 5 years
      they have dropped. Even though he rushed for 3 td's last year, Elway is 
      still a mediocre QB for fantasy owners. Elway has never thrown more than
      22 td's in a season, and now with the sore are he reportly has now it's
      highly unlikey that he will reach even that modest total in 1991....

  so you tell me who has a QB and who doesn't please????

  mike
36.230FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Aug 21 1991 16:477
    The qualities that make a player in any sport attractive to a fantasy
    owner are not necessarily the ones that make that player attractive to
    the real teams in the sport he plays, and vice-versa.  I wouldn't
    necessarily consider Brister a better QB than Elway just because his
    fantasy ratings are higher.
    
    John
36.231still the most overrated/overpayed bum in the leagueCNTROL::CHILDSTake me to Roslyn's Cafe PleaseWed Aug 21 1991 17:2811
 Sorry John but this is the Donk's note objectivety is not an admirable trait 
 in this note. While I concur that what makes a player attractive to a fantasy
 owner and a real team are two different things the fact of the matter is that
 Smellway is just plain bad and getting worst by the day while Brister is up
 and coming....

 Who would you rather have on the Pats if you were able to have either of these
 two???

 mike
36.232FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Aug 21 1991 17:4110
    I don't know which one I'd take since I don't really know enough about
    either player.  I can't measure players the way a coach does because I
    don't have enough knowledge to do so.  I've also often said that in
    football individual stats are really a crock since the stats an
    individual player racks up are mostly a function of how the team is
    doing and not necessarily based on his own talents, hence, individual
    stats in football in and of themselves are not an accurate gauge of a
    player's value.
    
    John
36.233some facts to help you chooseCNTROL::CHILDSTake me to Roslyn's Cafe PleaseWed Aug 21 1991 18:029
 Brister likes women, beer, staying up late, chewing tabachey, fighting and
 cussing.

 Elway likes horses, crying, brie, being pampered and nestle crunchbars..

 now who do you choose???

 mike
36.234CARROL::LEFEBVREKnows his way around a G stringWed Aug 21 1991 18:105
    Easy, Elway.
    
    At least he doesn't need his mommy in the stands.
    
    Mark.
36.235CNTROL::CHILDSTake me to Roslyn's Cafe PleaseWed Aug 21 1991 18:155
 no he has his doggie wife there instead...

 the only reason Bubby's mother is there cause he can't he chose which one
 of his gazillion girlfriends to bring to the game...
36.2368-)GENRAL::WADEWed Aug 21 1991 20:1710
    
    	Janet (to us adoring Godway fans) is the best looking
    	QB's wife in the NFL.  How dare you call her a dog!
    
    	Yeah, I heard ole Bubble wanted to bring all his girlfriends
    	to a Steeler game.......but the local dog pound is closed
    	on Sundays.
    
    	Claybone 
    
36.237STILL LIVING IN HELL - The Denver theme '91STRATA::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Thu Aug 22 1991 11:394
    
    	Bring them to the Dawg Pound....plenty of bones to go around.
    
    	Dirty Dawg
36.238Cant Stand Montana but his wife is hotMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Aug 22 1991 14:325
    I seem to remember Joe Montana's wife looking pretty sharp, I say
    she may rate up there at NFL QB's #1 Good Looking Wife, of course
    I havent seen them all but JM definatly rates higher than Elway's.
    
    							MAB
36.239Still nursing!CUJO::CRANEThe original BUDMANThu Aug 22 1991 14:426
    I heard Booby's mother is in the stands because he is still being
    breast fed! She is hoping to have him on solid food in the next 10-15
    years and then she will tackle poddy training!
    
    RC
    
36.240Elway had his best % complete last year!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Aug 22 1991 18:0713
    re-1   Good one.  Enough of that rathole, since Mike will always have
    something laime to sling back.
    
      The Broncs play Phoenix in Tempe tommorrow night.  Phoenix is
    undefeated in pre-season which I know doesn't count,  but look at their
    increasing talent, and I say it will be a typical Denver game.  They
    will make it close no matter who they play, not counting SBs.
    
      This game should resemble a regular season game since teams are
    trying to "fine tune" they're 1st stringers.  They will probably play
    through qtr.3. 
    
         Tim
36.241STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Aug 22 1991 19:066
    I know it was against a Patriots team that has a ton of holes to fill,
    but the Cardinals looked very impressive Saturday night...should be a
    good test for the Broncos.  
    
    
    py
36.242HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Aug 23 1991 11:084
       I heard the Cards qb could be out for the year. That means the Pats
    have a 'chance' when they go back there later this season. Rosenbach
    had a helluva game vs the Pats, but who doesn't!
                                   Denny
36.243Go Broncos...whatta teamCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Aug 23 1991 15:027
      Appearently Rosenbach messed up a ligament in his knee during
    practice yesterday,  so the Broncs have to play against they're #2 QB,
    who ever he is.
    
      What time does the game start?  I know its on ch 21.
    
    		Tim
36.244BSS::JCOTANCHFri Aug 23 1991 15:313
    Game doesn't start 'til 8:30 and Tom Tupa will be Phoenix's QB.
    
    Joe
36.245Thankfully it doesn't countCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Aug 26 1991 14:0516
      I guess I'll be 1st to say ouch.  The Broncos got spanked in the
    second half Friday night.  Turnovers killed them.
    
      The offense just didn't seem to get much going.  Denvers rushing game
    could be in trouble if the pre-season is a sign of how its going to be.
    
      I didn't think the Defense sucked as bad as the score indicated. 
    When you turn the ball over inside your own 25 2x,  then your in deep
    stuff.  Actually all 3 turnovers were in denvers end.  Also,  the
    offense did alot of nothing,  which means the defense was on the field
    quite a bit,  especially in the 1st half.  It did actually get close to
    even in the second half.
    
      Get back in Bobby!!
    
    	Tim
36.246Get used to it, Timmibob!ROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Mon Aug 26 1991 14:211
    
36.247This is true ???OURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZMon Aug 26 1991 14:2813
FFL 12 round. 


Robichaud - Marv Cook, TE, Patriots
Wardle - Reggie Rembert, WR, Bengals
Pfau - Roger Craig, RB, Raiders
Hernandez - Steve Young, QB, 49ers
Dore - Ickey Woods, RB, Bengals
Childs - John Elway, QB, Broncos <<<<<<<<< Mike CHILDS worships  the DUKE>>>>>
Santos - 
Riggen - 
Maselli -
Polakowski - 
36.248GENRAL::WADETue Aug 27 1991 14:0315
    Bronco cuts:
    
    Kevin Clark CB
    Kip Corrington S x
    Scott Curtis LB  x
    David Galloway DE
    Don Gibson NT
    Marcus Hopkins S  x
    Keith Jennings TE
    Barry Johnson WR
    Shawn Moore QB
    Mark Murray LB
    Brent Parkinson OT
    Jim Szymanski DE
    Andre Townsen NT x
36.249GENRAL::WADETue Aug 27 1991 14:064
    
    	The "x" in .248 indicates the player received an injury settlement.
    
    	Claybone
36.250More...BSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 27 1991 14:156
    Denver is expected to put Vance and Crawford Ker in IR and reclaim
    Clark and Gibson.  Moore, Murray, Jennings, Barry Johnson and Hopkins
    are all expected to be re-signed for the rookie developmental squad.
    
    Joe
                           
36.251Today will tell the rest of storyCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Aug 27 1991 15:187
      I hope these guys make it thru waivers, especially Moore and Clark. 
    I don't know enough about the others.
    
      Maybe Denver could get a decent tackle off waivers...Doug Smith was
    cut by the rams.  Denver could use a pro-bowl Center.
    
      	Tim
36.252GENRAL::WADETue Aug 27 1991 15:435
    
    	Ida know Tim.  I think Kartz has been doing a good job
    	pro bowl or not.......
    
    	Claybone
36.253COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Aug 27 1991 20:4213
      I kinda agree/disagree with ya Claybone.  The reason is Denver has a
    heck of a time running up the middle, which I know alot of teams do. 
    On the other hand, you are right, that he has usually done a good job
    on the pass rush,  and very rarely does he and Biff have a snapping
    problem.
    
      This guy from the RAms would be a good back-up or starter.  We know
    that Keith seems to get injured every year,  and ends up sitting out
    some games.  I guess thats my real point.
    
      Has anyone heard of the waivers and reclaims yet?
    
    		Tim
36.254Clearing waiversCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Aug 28 1991 12:319
      Denver did put Vance and Ker on IR.
    
      Kevin Clark and Jim Szymanski were added to roster.
    
      Shawn Moore, Barry Johnson, Mark Murray, and Don Gibson are on the
    dev squad.
    
    
    		Tim
36.255Wake up Bronco fans, it starts for real this SundayBSS::JCOTANCHFri Aug 30 1991 18:3616
    LG Sean Farrell is doubtful for the Cincy game and will be replaced by
    Dave Widell.  Kartz will start despite a badly sprained ankle.
    
    I'm tired of hearing about the Humphrey situation.
    
    I hope Alfred Williams does good in the NFL, but I just hope that
    because he's playing 30 miles from his college campus he doesn't get
    too fired up and put Elway out for the year.
    
    Of course, I think Denver'll win on Sunday.
    
    My prediction for the season: 11-5
    
    
    Joe
       
36.256HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Aug 30 1991 18:413
       Sean Farrell has been 'doubtful' for about 3 years now. You guyz'll
    be lucky to get half a dozen games outta him.
                                          Denny
36.257COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Aug 30 1991 19:1410
      I will wake up Sunday and get motivated,  thats if I'm not camping or
    something. 
    
      The Broncos should pull it out by 3-4 points.
    
      I think a 9-7 season is more like it.  They are to inconsistent to do
    much better.  Of course 9-7 should be good enough to get them into the
    playoffs,  but who knows.
    
    	Tim
36.258Is this a sign of things to come?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Sep 03 1991 13:4810
       Whatta game!!!
    
      Elway mixed the play calling very well,  and the whole Bronco team
    looked like they could do no wrong.
    
      We will see if it is carried into LA this weekend.  We know that the
    FAiders defense is better than Cinncy's,  even though you wouldn't have
    thought that after the way they played against the oilers.
    
    	Tim
36.259Elway-bashers, you get the week off!BSS::JCOTANCHTue Sep 03 1991 14:2626
>                     -< Is this a sign of things to come? >-
    
    Let's hope so!
    
    Offense was near-perfect in the 1st half, only stalling on one drive
    where Treadwell missed a short FG.  That 3rd quarter had me worrying
    back to last year, but when Cincy was about to get back within 7
    Mecklenberg made the key play of the game sacking Boomer and causing
    a fumble.  And what a great way for Braxton to return, making the pick
    and returning it for a TD that just about sealed the win.  Croel and
    Mecklenberg made that play though, getting in Boomer's face and causing
    the bad throw.
    
    Denver had a field goal blocked and nearly had some extra points
    blocked.  The O-line looked real good, but keep in mind Cincy's defensive
    line isn't among the league's best.  
    
    I don't really expect a win this week in LA, but if they can pull it
    off we're looking at a possible 4-0 start.  If Denver can get out to a
    4-2 start that should be considered great with the  three tough road 
    games in there.  The Cincy game was a must-win IMO. 
    
    That penalty after Elway's 1st TD was total crap.
    
    
    Joe
36.260GO DONKS!CSC32::SALZERWed Sep 04 1991 02:4117
    They had me worried there in the 3rd qtr. Cinci was in position to 	
    make it a 28-21 game untill the fumble down deep. There were a couple
    of blatant drops of Boomer's passes earlier that also hurt the Bengals
    badly. Denver's secondary still looks like swiss cheese. Anybody that can
    pick it apart will delight in some Bronco fondu. Before sunday, I
    was saying 8-8 but I can safely fudge now with a 9-7. 
    
    How about them Raiders? Outscored something like 100 to 20 in their
    past 2 games. What's going on with those guys? Everybody is saying
    how mad they're going to be. Are they still claiming to be just a
    good qb away from the bowl? Where's the defense?  As always we can
    throw out the stats on this one. Another FG will probably be the
    difference and maybe in OT. An 0-2 start will have them talking
    to themselves. 
    
    BoB
    
36.261Bronco Are Back And So Is JackQUASER::HUNTERBronco's #1 in Boomer's BookWed Sep 04 1991 18:0610
    AAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
    
    
     What a game !!!!!   I knew that all Denver had to do was get away from
    the Collie Boy calling a game plan that even a Clowns fan could
    predict.  The Donks will have a good season.....  They should,  they
    do have a pretty weak schedule.  (Boy,  if Wardle could hear me say
    that he'd never beleive it)
    
    Big Game
36.262GENRAL::WADEThu Sep 05 1991 18:0013
    Donk tidbits from today's local rag:
    
    	Alphonso Carrecker will be back wk 7
    
    	Danny boy gives a big thumbs up for Al Davis being in the HoF.
    
    	BBJ needs 17 more yards passing to hit 25K.
    
    	Reeves is 9-10 against the Raiders as coach of the Broncos.
    	In those 19 games, only 15 points separate the scoring of
    	the two teams (LA 375 Donks 360).
    
    	Claybone
36.263Expect a big emotional letdown Sunday !OURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZFri Sep 06 1991 14:428
	Every time Denver wins big or pulls a upset over a team that is favored 
the week afterwards is spent gloating and floating over what a good team Denver
is and not concentrating on the weaknesses. Denver's O-line had lasted Sunday 
off, Expect a overconfident Offensive line that gets blown off the ball for the 
first half. I expect Denver's D to turn in a second strong performance. The 
key is to get to Schroeder early and often. 

Jeff
36.264COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Sep 06 1991 19:164
      I agree with the o-line bit Jeff.  It should be a classic
    Donk/faider game regardless.
    
    	Tim
36.265Notice it didn't take me 5 days to get in hereBSS::JCOTANCHGo IU HoosiersMon Sep 09 1991 12:2932
    Well, Denver had a chance to go to LA and start the Faids off to nice
    0-2 start and further disturb their confidence.  And with KC's loss,
    take an early lead in a division that promises to be a dogfight.  But
    no.  They choke instead.
    
    This game was as ugly as last year's opener in LA.  The offensive line
    played terrible.  33 yards net rushing and 5 sacks, 'nuf said.  The
    defense played pretty good, although the key point in the game was
    where they let LA take the 2nd half kickoff and march downfield while
    consuming over 9 minutes off the clock.  The worst part of that drive
    was that they had LA and long yardage situations and let them off the
    hook.  2nd and 20 from LA's own 10.  3rd and 8 or 9 up around the 35. 
    A 1st and 15 a little later.  You gotta stop teams in 3rd and long,
    folks.  They were putting a lot of pressure on Schrader early, but
    decided to back off or stop blitzing or something in the 2nd half.  I 
    think they should be blitzing Schrader nearly every play.  He's the type 
    of QB that fumbles and gets rattled if you put enough pressure on him.  
    Schrader's not a great QB,.but if you give him the time, he will pick you 
    apart (as will most any NFL QB if he's given the time to sit in the pocket 
    and eat his lunch).
    
    Other tidbits:
    Denver had some missed opportunities on offense in the 1st half where
    they had to settle for 3.  They also didn't recover fummbles by Craig
    and Schrader that may have turned it around.  This game showed how
    important Clark is returning kickoffs and punts. 
    
    I find it mandatory that Denver win their next 2 games, both of which
    are at home and against teams they should beat.  
    
     
    Joe
36.266HACK, HACK, HACKROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Mon Sep 09 1991 14:082
    
    
36.267GENRAL::WADEMon Sep 09 1991 14:117
    
    	You can chalk the Raider win up to their defensive line.  They
    	completely dominated Denver's O-line.  Elway was lucky to be
    	sacked *only* 5 times.  He was running for his life on practically
    	every other passing play.
    
    	Claybone
36.268COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Sep 09 1991 16:4512
       I thought denvers def line played bad in the second half.  Like Joe
    said,  keep the pressure on the QB,  and he will choke.
    
       All in all,  it was a typical Bronco/faider game.  It won't be any
    different come nov. 10th.   These kind of games I like,  because they
    are always close and it seems to come down to the final seconds before
    its decided.  Almost got the onsides kick.  That would have been
    interesting.....
    
       Next week is Seattle,  and expect another classic rival game.
    
    	Tim
36.269Denver in week 2 = Choke !!! Faiders Stink !!QUASER::HUNTERBronco's #1 in Boomer's BookWed Sep 11 1991 12:2311
    
     Well,  The Damn Donks stepped on it once again...  I surely can't live
    through another Jeckel and Hyde season.  I say fire Reeves, Bench Elway
    and pay Bobby H. what ever he wants to come play ball.  The Donks 
    could be in for a long long long season if they lose next week to the
    Seachickens......   ;^)
    
    Big Game
    
    P.S.  The Donks are still 3,000,000,000 time better than the Clevescum
          Clowns have ever been !!!!!  
36.270Any left tackles for hire?WEPUBS::DCHAVEZDale - CXN2 Colorado SpringsWed Sep 11 1991 13:439
    Let's face it.  Until the Broncos invest heavily (no pun intended) in a
    good left tackle, they will continue to play inconsistent through the
    year.  In fact, I look for John Elway to get seriously hurt this year
    for the first time, due to a missed block by the left tackle.  The left
    tackle has got to protect the (right-hand) quarterback's blind side,
    and I don't see anyone that has done that yet.

    Dale
36.271you must be sweaten'ROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Wed Sep 11 1991 15:3619
    
    	Hey Big Lame,
    		
    		Man you are really trying to get into it, arn't you?
    
    	Your Donkies are so much better arn't they.....thats why they are
    undefeated...right?  Lets see some stats here.  Lets see why they are
    just so much better.
    	Your screw ball team will be in the Dawg Pound this year again and
    the outcome will remain the same.  Bernie is better than that donky
    face guy with the teeth that grow out of his nose.  Come on man, lets
    see the stats that support your stinking attitude.  
    	Donky face's days are numbered.  I agree with Dale.
    
    	Go eat a bone.  Here I have one for you right here.  A nice big
    one.
    
    	Grrrrrrrrr!
    
36.272CAM::WAYIrene Ryan is SUCH a babe!Wed Sep 11 1991 15:5212
Yup.

There's ol Hal, "strutting his chest" to quote ACC.  His team lost
to Dallas (an unproven commodity at best) and beat the worst team
in the NFL.  And he's all beatin' up on everyone else.

Wait and see what happens.  In a few weeks, Hal Houdini will disappear
until next preseason....

Hey Hal, how're the Indians doing????

'Saw
36.273BSS::JCOTANCHMichigan *will* prevailWed Sep 11 1991 16:0511
>    	Your screw ball team will be in the Dawg Pound this year again and
>    the outcome will remain the same.  

    Yea, the it'll be the same outcome as all those AFC Championship games.
    
    You will be long gone from notes by then (Dec. 8th) when your dawgs
    are about 4-9.
    
    
    Joe          
 
36.274Does Hal = Peewee?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Sep 11 1991 21:4117
      Way to go Cacti,  Hal is riled up, and he will yap until they lose to
    a team with a winning record.  Actually,  who knows,  the stains might
    even lose to the kitty cats this weekend....
    
      As to benching Elway,  c'mon, that won't happen.  I think the lines
    lost this last game.  Reeves and Elway didn't do it.  Sure Elway 
    overthru Nattiel on the 1 yard line,  but he was being chased.
    
      If it was Reeves, then blame him for only having 3 d-linemen in the
    game.  The announcers kept saying the Broncs only had 4 healthy
    linemen,  so maybe he should get another on the squad, and maybe put a
    RB on practice team.
    
      I'm wondering how good the Defense would do in a 4-3 instead of 3-4?
    
    
    	Tim
36.275you want some stats???STRATA::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Thu Sep 12 1991 11:2619
    
    You want some stats???
    
    	Here is one:
    
    		#1 QB after week 2 = Kelly
    
    			don't ask me how he gets rated 1st with 3 INT'S
    
    		#2 QB after week 2 = BERNIE KOSAR OF THE CLEVELAND BROWNS
    			with a rating of 113.5
    
    			and where is horse face???????
    
    		No, I won't be gone either......I'll be sure to be here
    just to give you crap and make you eat crow after the Browns/Dongs
    game.
    
    		Dirty Dawg
36.276FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 12 1991 11:566
    QB rating is a function of 4 things - completion percentage, average
    gain per completion, TD percentage and Int percentage.  Kelly has
    thrown a lot of long passes and a lot of TD passes, so those figures
    could very easily balance out the 3 interceptions.
    
    John
36.277STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 12 1991 11:578
    >	#1 QB after week 2 = Kelly
    >	don't ask me how he gets rated 1st with 3 INT'S
    
    Eight TD passes for starters, which gives Kelly an 8 to 3 TD pass to INT 
    ratio.  I'll take that from my QB any day.
    
    
    py
36.278FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 12 1991 11:576
    Oh, and QB rating is like batting average.  It takes a lot of games for
    the true rating to be known.  With such a small number of games early
    in the season, just like with batting averages, QB ratings tend to be
    either abnormally high or abnormally low.
    
    John
36.279Bernie maybe not quite that good....FTMUDG::REEDOKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTERThu Sep 12 1991 12:5819
    >    Oh, and QB rating is like batting average.  It takes a lot of games for
    > the true rating to be known.  With such a small number of games early
    > in the season, just like with batting averages, QB ratings tend to be
    > either abnormally high or abnormally low.
    
    > John
    
    
    
    
    > 		#2 QB after week 2 = BERNIE KOSAR OF THE CLEVELAND BROWNS
    > 			with a rating of 113.5
    
    This is obviously an abmormally high rating.
    
    But then, its still not that bad for a QB that scrambles in highheels.
    
    Cowboy
    
36.280It's only my opinionQUASER::HUNTERBronco's #1 in Boomer's BookThu Sep 12 1991 21:4211
    Cowboy...
    
     You beat me to it.  I'm quite sure that Bernie will finish in the to 5
    to 8 in QB ratings this season, he always does.  The only problem for 
    the Clowns will be that they'll finish last in their Division, last in
    the AFC and darn close to the bottom in the league.....  Hal,  You
    outta know by now that I'm not a stats man....  football is purely 
    emotional for me.  BTW John Hendry,  Where is John-Boy on the QB rating
    list ???
    
    	Big Game
36.281The Cleveland Indians could beat the PatriotsSTRATA::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Fri Sep 13 1991 11:145
    
    	Big Game,
    		He is rated below Bernie.  3rd and about 8th in the NFL.
    
    	Dirty Dawg
36.282BSS::JCOTANCHMichigan *will* prevailFri Sep 13 1991 13:4010
    There will be 3 changes in Denver's lineup this Sunday, 2 due to injury
    and 1 due to performance.  Jeff Davidson will replace Darrell Hamilton
    at LT because Hamilton hasn't been cuttin' it.  Nattiel will return
    punts because Clarks isn't ready to go yet.  Michael Brooks will miss a 
    game or two and be replaced by rookie Keith Traylor.
    
    If Denver is going to contend for the AFC West this Sunday's game
    against Seattle is a must win.
    
    Joe
36.283COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Sep 13 1991 18:016
      Clark isn't ready yet?  Nattiel has proved that he is scared when
    people are running at him on returns,  so maybe Le Lo lang?
    
      Denver should get 4-5 sacks this game,  and maybe 2-3 ints....
    
    	Tim
36.284FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Sep 16 1991 11:535
    Going into this week, Kelly has a completion pct in the seventies, had
    8 TDs and an average per attempt of over 9 yards.  That more than
    balanced out the 3 interceptions.
    
    John
36.285Elway 19 of 32 for 252 and no ints!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Sep 16 1991 12:2220
      Well this game was a typical "Broncos try to find way to lose" game. 
    For the most part, the game was boring.  The Broncos about lost this
    game. For some reason,  the Broncos went to the prevent defense on
    Seachickens last drive.  Yes there were finally 4 linemen on this
    series,  but no blitzing when it was needed?
    
      The offense studdured (sp?) again.  Why can't they get that piece of
    leather in the endzone?  The field goals are better than nothing, but
    TDs are a must if they are going to compete against the better teams.
    
      Don't ever say Denver gets they're way all the time.  Look at the 1st
    fumble of John L.  He lost it,  but the play wasn't reveiwed.  At least
    the refs reviewed the Atwater recovery and overturned that one.
    
      The ball was greased yesterday.....
    
    
      Next week,  the winless Chargers,  who need a kicker;^
    
    	Tim
36.28616-10 dumb gameBSS::RIGGENCo Sports teams= BridesmaidsMon Sep 16 1991 21:219
    Seems that Dan Reeves and John Elway completely forgot the running
    game in the second half. Greg lewis didn't get a single carry in the
    game. Perryman proved why he is only a plan B player. He can't
    catch the ball. 
    Denver's secondary laid some hits on the Seahawks Sunday. The entire
    pass defense looked strong, and Croel put a hit on Kemp that made his
    dad winch in pain. 
    
    Jeff 
36.287BSS::JCOTANCHMichigan *did* prevailTue Sep 17 1991 12:4436
>    For some reason,  the Broncos went to the prevent defense on
>    Seachickens last drive.  Yes there were finally 4 linemen on this
>    series,  but no blitzing when it was needed?
    
    That was my biggest gripe, not just on the last drive but in the whole
    4th quarter.  They had Kemp running scared in the 3rd quarter, and when
    a team's behind 16-0 or 16-3 in the 4th quarter they have to pass the
    ball.  Didn't we talk about this last week?
    
    The offense also didn't help in the 4th, not even getting a first down
    in that quarter.  I don't really think it was play-calling, mostly poor
    execution and Seattle's gambling defense paying off.  Green entered the
    4th with something 21 carries for 96 yards and ended the game with 25
    carries for 92 yards.  5 of Denver's last 6 offensive plays were
    passes.
    
    For the first 3 quarters Denver looked good but not great.  Offense
    moved the ball fairly well but had to settle for FG's 3 times,
    including being stopped inside the Seattle 1-yard line.  Seattle moved
    the ball well on their first 2 drives, but didn't do much after that
    until the 4th quarter.
    
    Dennis has been laying some hits this season....Mike Horan is quietly
    off to a poor start punting the ball.
    
>       Next week,  the winless Chargers,     
    
    They better win this one.  They *should* be able to keep Friesz (sp?)
    and co. out of the end zone.  Kind of an interesting note that 2 teams
    from San Diego will be in Colo. this weekend; San Diego State will be in 
    CS Saturday to take on Air Force and the Chargers will be in Denver on 
    Sunday.
    
    
    Joe
    
36.288Will Denver be looking for another RB now?FTMUDG::REEDOKSTUNATHLETICSUPPORTERTue Sep 17 1991 13:039
    It sounds like Bobby Humphrey may be traded this week, probably to
    the 49ers.  This whole thing was stupid--on both sides, IMO.  Denver
    shouldn't have been so hard-nosed since they need his running ability
    and BH shouldn't have thought he was so valuable.  True, he's probably
    worth more than Denvers paying him but he should have waited until
    he was in camp and talked.
    
    Cowboy
    
36.289COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Sep 17 1991 14:4816
      Bobby hasn't been traded yet.  Reeves wants alot for him,  and no
    team is willing to pay the price.
    
      Appearently Bobby came back to Denver and packed all his stuff up and
    is gone,  so the media says.
    
      I still Denver needs him! Green has done ok,  but he seems to side
    step to much,  and Bobby always heads towards the endzone.
    
    
      Tim Lucas is out forr at least 8 weeks....Broken leg.  This gives
    Croel the Start I guess.
    
      Elway and Kosar are the only 2 AFC starting QBs without an int...
    
    	Tim
36.290Some serious HITS!CUJO::CRANEThe original BUDMANTue Sep 17 1991 19:4312
    I was at the game four rows up and I will tell you that the defense was
    laying some serious hits on Seattle. I agree with a few back that
    Denver's offensive problems were more execution in nature, than play
    calling. One difference I've seen between Green and Humphrey is Green
    seems more likely to run into a closed hole where Bobby would go on his
    own and try to make something happen. As much as I would love to see
    Bobby in the backfield, I am glad Denver did not give in to him. My
    $.02.
    
    BUDMAN
    
    
36.291GENRAL::WADETue Sep 17 1991 20:058
    
    	I agree the play calling was good...........until the
    	last two series.  Elway (I'm assuming) called 5 passes
    	out of the 6 plays.  He only completed one.  Thus, he
    	stopped the clock 4 times for the Seahawks.  I estimate
    	he gave them a minimum of 2 extra minutes of clock.
    
    	Claybroon
36.292fire the collieQUASER::HUNTERPatriots Football... I Love It !!!Thu Sep 19 1991 19:3811
    
     Well,  The_Donks (TM) did it again.....  I swear if you give them a 
    lead they sit on it no matter if 20 points or 1 point.  I really have
    started to hate watching second halfs.....  I wish they'd play an
    entire game for a change,  that would be nice wouldn't it?  I still
    say fire the Collie Molester (sp?), Bench horse teeth and get the 
    greedy little SOB Humphries back in uniform before it's to late to 
    keep the Faiders from holding to first place all year.
    
    
    Big Game
36.293GENRAL::WADEThu Sep 19 1991 20:134
    
    	There's a big sale on clues down at the mall.......:^)
    
    	Claybone
36.294RE -1: Good one Clay, I'm rollin'!!!!BSS::JCOTANCHThu Sep 19 1991 20:161
    
36.295Seriously !!! ;^)QUASER::HUNTERPatriots Football... I Love It !!!Thu Sep 19 1991 20:2716
    HEY CLAY WAD.... POUND SAND UP YOUR A**......  
    
     If the Donks would have fired the Collie Master a few years back
    they would have won those three Stupidbowls instead of banishing
    us Donk fans to a life of living hell having to put up with all 
    the shit about their *GREAT* efforts in  the "Big Game".....  I 
    still say fire The Collie, Bench John "Boy" Walton, and get that
    greedy little SOB Booby HumpsTrees back on the grid where he 
    belongs.  You may not agree now but you'll be calling for head(s)
    later in the season,  mark my words !
    
     Don't get me wrong,  I like the Donks(tm)  but they'll never be 
    anything but an average team with Tom Landry Jr. running the team.
    I think with the right coach Elway would be a much better QB than
    he is today.  I say give the team a chance Pat Bowlen..... Clean
    your house and start at the top !!!
36.296GENRAL::WADEThu Sep 19 1991 20:4014
    
    	Nah Jack, trying to cut down (on the sand pounding that is).
    
    	Those three Super Bowls were decided in the NFC champeenship
    	games.  The only one I even remotely thought they had a
    	chance in was the game against the Giants.  The bottom line
    	in all three games is that the defense was a sieve.  Small
    	and quick yeah, but not able to stop the bullies from the
    	NFC East and their smash-mouth football.  If you remember,
    	Joe Collier had the reigns of the defense all to himself.
    	He's gone.  And until they get a few stud muffins on the
    	D-line, they'll never win a Super Bowl IMHO.
    
    	Claybone
36.297This weekend won't be different;^COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Sep 19 1991 21:3619
      re-1  I think you it it on the nose Clay.  1-2 great pass rushers
    would make denvers defense like the NFC bad boys.  To bad they didn't
    get Smith last year or whenever they offered him $$$.
    
      Maybe, but not likely, Carreker can help out when he gets back in
    action oct 6th.
    
      Jack,  relax anad breath deeply,  your to young for this.  You have
    been a Denver fan since I've known you,  and Denver has played this
    "lets see how we can lose this game" type of ball for the past 8-10
    years.  Yeh, they do have some great come from behind wins,  but not to
    often.  
    
     I'm a Bronco fan for 2 reasons. 1)  I have lived in Colorado all my
    life (with the exception of some years away at school) so I have been a
    fan for 20 years.  2)  They're games are always nail biters, SBs not
    included.
    
    	Tim
36.29827-19 BroncosBSS::JCOTANCHMon Sep 23 1991 13:1233
    
    
    
    Atlanta, we love you!!!!!!!!
    
    First half was pretty lackluster and it was tied 6-6 at intermission. 
    Elway missed 2 open receivers in the first half and they had to settle 
    for field goals both times.  First he missed Kay heading for the corner
    of the end zone and then he missed Kay again when he was *wide* open at
    the back of the endzone.  
    
    Offense finally produced in the 4th when I thought they would end up
    letting the defense take it down to the wire again.  Green didn't do
    anything until the 4th, when he ran that 63-yarder and then the 20-yard
    run to ice it.  The offense did have a chance to end the game with
    about 10 minutes left leading by 8, but they went 3 downs and out. 
    I thought SD's defense played well - they at least looked a little more
    like the one that has the talent to be one of the league's best instead
    of the last-ranked defense in the NFL.
    
    I can see why you Charger guys dislike Henning.  I can't believe he
    went for that 4th and 6 in the 3rd quarter trailing by 4.  Talk about a
    terrible call.  You don't go for it on 4th and that many yards when
    it's still in the 3rd quarter and it's close.  Granted, the FG attempt
    would've been about 45 yards, but their kicker had alread hit three
    from beyond 40 on the day.
    
    The defense had some poor tackling and they should still be
    playing more aggressive IMO.  I said it last week and I'll say it
    again this week - Horan is still kicking poorly.
    
    
    Joe
36.299Donks Zap Happless Charges, With about 1 microvoltQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderMon Sep 23 1991 18:2524
     Well,  our beloved Donks did it again.....  Not near as bad as usual,
    but damn close!  I'm talking about letting a far worse team bring a
    game very close to the wire.  These Donks need to learn to ICE a game
    when they have the chance,  thats the true mark of a champion. 
    
     I think things went a little better this week with the offense.  I
    guess we can let horse face continue to call plays if he does as 
    well as he did yesterday.  I still say the the collie boy should take 
    a walk though.  
    
     3 - 1....  not to bad at this point in the season....  We're at the
    top of the AFC West thanks to Jerry's Kids down in Atlanta Ga.  Boy
    was I suprised to see that final....  The Faiders just aren't they
    team the used to be.
    
     Well,  If the Donkeys can stick 3 or four more wins under their belts
    this year won't be a total disaster ala the 89-90 season where they
    were an embrassment to the state of Co.  I really hope they can make
    it to the first round of the playoffs....  It will be good experience
    for the young guys on the team who haven't been there.
    
    
    Big Game
    
36.300HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Mon Sep 23 1991 18:345
       Do you Donk fans notice what ex-whipping boy and once again genius
    Joe Collier is doing up here in NE? He's turned the Pats D into a
    juggernaut (67 points allowed). Didn't Reeves say the game had "passed
    him by"?
                                      Denny
36.301GENRAL::WADEMon Sep 23 1991 19:078
    
    	Yeah, that's great.  Glad to see ole Joe doing well.  I
    	always kinda felt he was let go due to pressure from Blowin(tm)
    	to purge everybody left over from the Red Miller daze.
    
    	Has he put any new wrinkles in his defensive schemes?
    
    	Claybone
36.302 Collier = 3 Stupidbowl losses for the Donks !QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderMon Sep 23 1991 19:148
    
     I'm glad that Collier  is in New England Helping the Patsies......
    Now they can retake some of the records the Donks took in their
    Stupidbowl thrashings.....  That is if they ever make the Playoffs
    again...   ;^)
    
    
    Big Game
36.303AXIS::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,McMurtryMon Sep 23 1991 19:468
36.3042 tough road games are next.COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Sep 23 1991 21:2515
       Defense did not get enough pressure on Friesz yesterday.  Yes Meck
    did FINALLY get to him at the  end of the game,  but I don't recall any
    other sacks.
    
      I thought up the middle looked like Reeves of old.  It seems Elway
    had the RBs go up the middle 20+ times yesterday.   Green didn't do
    that much other than the 2 runs as Joe stated.  Why keep running up the
    middle if its not working?  This wasn't Cinncy again.
    
      The faiders sip...or should I say Schreoder......
    
    
         Any key injuries?
    
    	Tim
36.305wanna buy a bridge?CNTROL::CHILDSUpthrutheCracksOutthruthebrokenGlassTue Sep 24 1991 10:3712
 Cmon now Big Game get with the program will ya...3 or 4 more wins will make
 the season? 2 games against the Patriots, a 5th place schedule, I'd say any-
 thing less than 11 wins is a wasted season...

 I agree with you though they should bench Elway but not until after this
 week. CLAYBROON nailed the resons why earlier. 

 Green is not Humphrey, anyone who think the Donks were smart not to sign
 him.... 

 ;^)
36.306COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Sep 24 1991 14:076
      I see Mikey is back.   Hey Mike,  I don't want any bridges, its
    funner to just drive through the river;^
    
      Maybe the Stellers could by a QB?
    
    	Tim
36.307Hey Mikey.... Donks to the Bowl (HA HA HA HA)QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderWed Sep 25 1991 13:265
    Well,..... Leaving for vacation tomorrow,  Just didn't want anyone
    to think I disappeared after the donks lose to the V-Kings this 
    weekend....  I'll be back on the 8th or 9th
    
    Big Game
36.308CSC32::SALZERWed Sep 25 1991 23:5716
    Wasn't last year's Viking game a sunday night game at Minnie also?
    Yeah and the Broncos were winning at the half and came out
    half asleep in th 3rd quarter and handed Minnie a much needed win.
    By that part of the season the pattern was deeply set and I just 
    couldn't watch the rest of the game. Last year just about all opponents
    stood in line to get a come-from-behind-much-needed-win. 
    
    Denver has back-to-back games in domes. It's the Homer Dome this week
    then on to the House of Pain the following sunday. The 'rap' on the
    Broncos is that they can't win on plasto grass and cant win in domes. 
    Splitting the next 2 sounds reasonable ending up 4-2 and then a week
    on the beach. 
    
    BoB
    
    GO 9'ERS! (this week anyway)
36.309Finally 2 minutes to read notesCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Sep 27 1991 20:409
      I think the Broncos stand a better chance at beating the Vikes more
    than they do with Houston. Moon will have a field day unless the D puts
    major pressure on him.
    
      The Broncos might have a tough time scoring against the Vikes.  It
    should be interesting.  Splitting wouldn't be half bad,  but 2 L's are
    most likely if Denver continues this "road" trend they have going...
    
       Tim
36.310BRONCOS 13, Viqueens 6!!!!!!!BSS::JCOTANCHMon Sep 30 1991 11:5141
    *Huge* win...Hell, that's an understatement.  I think I lost about 5
    years off my life in the last 7 minutes though.  But we send absolutely
    no thanks out to SD and SF :(, making this win all the more important.
    
    Where do we start?...Okay, Lewis' fumble.  You know, as soon as Green
    left the game, that's the first thing that entered my mind.  Here comes
    a guy who is cold and has been sitting the whole game.  The only thing
    that could've been worse here would've been a turnover returned for a
    TD.  I'll admit, as soon as Minney recovered the fumble I thought
    Denver would lose.  This game had Buffalo of last year written all over
    it.  Except this year, it wouldn't be 77 seconds, it would've been ONE
    play - the fumble.  If Denver would have lost this game they wouldn't
    have recovered all season IMO.  All I can say is I'll take all those drops 
    by Minn's receivers.  Denver needed this one bad, especially after nearly
    having it locked up halfway thru the 4th.
    
    Green was just incredible, ending up with 158 yards.  Who would've
    thought he'd be leading the AFC in rushing after 5 weeks??? Looked like a
    couple of times he would break it.  Elway had a subpar night
    statistically, but he had terrible protection and many drops by
    receivers.  Green dropped a probable TD pass in the 2nd quarter.
    Offense didn't do too much in the 1st half -  I got the
    feeling there was some kind of invisible wall around midfield.
    
    Elway's TD run was just great.  The way he just bulled over that
    fullback got the whole team fired up.  As bad as the OL was protecting
    Elway, they were obviously opening up some holes for Gaston.
    
    I don't care what Denver does next week at the House of Pain.  They
    got what they needed here, a split on the road and at least a 4-2
    start.  If they would've gone on the road and lost road it would've
    dropped them to .500 and taken away their momentum and confidence.
    I'll put it this way: A win next week would be pure gravy, and I'll be
    very surprised if they can go down there and win.  (Actually, I'm
    surprised when anybody wins down in Houston).  Now if we can just get
    some help from the Chargers and Luckalo(tm) next week...  Damm, I hate
    rooting for the Bills.
    
    
    Joe
       
36.311CAM::WAYRIP Dr. SeussMon Sep 30 1991 11:548
I didn't watch much of the game.

How did the deaf player on the d-line do?  I saw a news report
on him, and have been trying to follow the story up.

Any info, greatly appreciated....

'Saw
36.312GENRAL::WADEMon Sep 30 1991 12:2914
    
    'Saw,
    
    	Last week, he got a clutch sack at the end of the game
    	to help ice it.  His name is Kenny Walker BTW.
    
    	Last night, Anthony Carter got the ball on a reverse
    	which looked like it caught the whole defense, including
    	Walker, overpursuing.  Walker hit the brakes and reversed
    	himself.  He took off like a shot and caught Carter on
    	the sidelines (held him to a 4-6 yard gain).  Walker has
    	great speed.
    
    Claybroon
36.313Mistakes kill ya every timeCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Sep 30 1991 19:1434
      That was a good play by Walker.  Fletcher was suckered REAL bad on
    that.  He saw CArter coming around,  but kept going for the other back
    instead of just side stepping 4-5 steps and catching CArter for a 10
    yrd loss.  O'well......
    
    
      I thought it was a good game called by Elway.  He did overthrow a
    couple,  especially down on the 3-5 yard line.  I beleive the fullback
    or Green was open,  but Biff had to "loft" it 3 yards over a Vike
    defender,  thus missing a wide open reciever.   There were alot of
    dropped balls by both teams,  which will decide momentum every time.
    
      I thought the O-line did ok protecting Elway.  I'm not sure how many
    times he was sacked, 2 maybe?
    
      The Lewis fumble did p me off,  but Denver had to find a way to let
    Minny back in.
    
      Horan was 27th in punting a beginning of last night.  He had 2 good
    kicks inside 20,  but looked so-so the rest of the time.
    
    
      Denver still needs more pressure on QB!!!!  If they don't stunt/blitz
    this weekend against Houston,  then look for blowout by Houston,  or
    high scoring affair as long as Denver moves the ball well.
    
      Green did have a good night running,  but that 1 stat was shown,
    which 47% of Green's yards came on 6 carries.  Good or bad???  I say
    questionable,  but last night he was consistant on yards/carry.  Did
    anyone notice that he seemed to line up farther away from scrimmage
    than normal?  He looked like Dickerson does way back there.....
    
    
         Tim  
36.314A Horse is a Donk of course, of course!HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Oct 01 1991 15:432
       Mr Ed premiered on Network TV 30 years ago today.
                                    Denny
36.315CAM::WAYThank you, Thank you, Sam I amTue Oct 01 1991 15:543
>       Mr Ed premiered on Network TV 30 years ago today.

And I was 3 years and two days old....8^)
36.316CuteCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Oct 01 1991 17:523
      Hate to tell ya Denny, but a donkey is not the same as a horse;^
    
      Tim
36.317CAM::WAYThank you, Thank you, Sam I amTue Oct 01 1991 18:009

	A horse is a horse, of course, of course
	and no one can talk to a horse, of course,
	Unless, of coure, the horse, of course,
	Is the famous Mr Ed.



36.318Mule High stadiumCTHQ2::LEARYTue Oct 01 1991 18:153
    However boys,
    A horse + donkey= Mule (Elway's teef)
    
36.319HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Oct 02 1991 09:574
    >                         -< Mule High stadium >-
    
       What Burrow is it in?
                                   Denny
36.320CELTIK::JACOBYou Trying to make ME sick????Wed Oct 02 1991 17:0822
    Hal-Lay-Yew-Ya,   MY  Life Is Now Complete!!!!
    
    
    Went to a "Pizza Hut" lasted night here in Colorado Springs for the
    $3.99 "All-U-Can-Eat" special, (they lost money on me).  Was there
    about 10 minutes when one of the "waiters", and I use the term loosely,
    comes walking thru with his hands full of rolled up paper.  As he did
    at other tables, he stops at my table and says, "Would you like a free
    John Elway poster???"   
    
    The tone of voice he was using was something like what you'd expect to
    hear if someone was asking you if you wanted guaranteed entry to
    heaven.  
    
    BTW, I took one.  Just gotta figure out a use for it.  The dog's
    already paper trained and I don't have a bird.
    
    
    (8^)*   (8^0*   (8^)*
    
    
    JaKe
36.321HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Oct 02 1991 17:422
       gee Jake, now you have something to cover up your Bernie poster!
                                 Denny  ;^o
36.322GENRAL::WADEWed Oct 02 1991 18:125
    
    	Hey!  You'd better hang onto that poster.  Someday, it's
    	gonna be worth..........well............something. ;^)
    
    	Claybroon
36.323(*^)* (8^0*CELTIK::JACOBYou Trying to make ME sick????Wed Oct 02 1991 18:4713
    
    >>   gee Jake, now you have something to cover up your Bernie poster!
    >>                             Denny  ;^o
    
    Nah, I got a Bernie poster in the mail from an ANONYMOUS source.
    As soon as I opened it up, my dog ran over and took it right out of my
    hands and ran behind the couch with it, and proceeded to soil the thing
    right in the middle of Bernice's face.
    
    And they call 'em "dumb animals"!!
    
    JaKe
    
36.324Humphrey to SF???BSS::JCOTANCHWould you, Could you, with a goat?Thu Oct 03 1991 11:3314
    It's looks like the Broncos might be able to unload Humphrey.  The
    Broncos want a 1st and a 3rd round choice.  The 49ers offered their
    1992 1st round pick about a week and were turned down, but now have
    supposedly offered a 1st and a 5th round choice.  
    
    Denver certainly won't get his full worth and probably won't get what
    they're asking, but they should unload him for what they can get before
    the Oct. 8th trading deadline.  If they don't trade him before the
    deadline he will end up sitting out the entire season and then his
    stock will really plummet.  Look at the Vikes and Dozier - he's on his
    2nd year of a holdout.  They'll probably never get anything for him. 
    Trade Humphrey now Denver and get what you can while the gettin's good!
    
    Joe
36.325COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Oct 03 1991 15:2614
      I think Reeves should go for a Defensive or off linemen who is a
    pro-bowler and a lower draft pick.
    
      Just 'cause Denver gets a 1st round pick,  doesn't mean they will get
    someone worth while.  Plus,  if they did get a good 1st rounder, how
    long would it take to make this person a starter?  All those questions
    can be answered better with someone who is already established.
    
        Just my thoughts.....
    
    
      So Jake,  how do ya like this place so far?
    
    	Tim
36.326Denver almost lost as bad as Faids did in HoustonBSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 07 1991 11:5430
    
    
    
    Denver loses 42-14 but many, many thanks go out to SD as the Faiders
    also lose.
     
    Denver was never in this one, but the defense actually played pretty
    well.  Houston's first TD was a recovered blocked punt in the end zone,
    2nd TD was a 1-yard drive after an int, 3rd TD was a 13-yard drive
    after a fumble, and the 4th TD was a fumble returned for a TD. 
    Only Houston's last 2 TD's were good drives of 80 and 74 yards. 
    Needless to say, Denver's turnovers were *very* costly.  Total yardage
    was only 376 to 363 in favor of Houston.
    
    But Denver's offense was pathetic in the first half.  After that first
    drive, before the punt was blocked, I had a feeling it was going to be
    a long day.  I expected an onslaught of Houston points right after
    that, but Denver kept it at 7-0 until the 2nd quarter when the roof
    caved in.  Once again, Elway was running for his life and was sacked 6
    times.  I'll tell you, if a team gets ahead of Denver by a couple of
    TD's all they need to do is start blitzing Elway.  It's kind like
    getting ahead of a wishbone team and forcing them to pass.  Denver did
    do a little in the 2nd half but the game was over for all intense
    purposes.  The running game was bad yesterday but I felt like it never
    got a chance to get in sync - Denver only ran the ball on less than
    one-third of their offensive plays.
    
    
    Joe
    
36.327CELTIK::JACOBkweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbweMon Oct 07 1991 12:3117
    Hey, I found out something out here in Colorado that nobody told me
    about.
    
    When did Bif go into the restaurant business??
    
    I was down at the Royal Gorge yesterday, and what place did I see????
    
    "Mr. Ed's Family Restaurant".  Now this place is for real.  I wonder if
    everybody that works there has to wear a jersey with #7 on it, plus a
    fake set of Teef!!
    
    Yesterday's special was probably "Burnt Donkey, fried in OIL"!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
36.328Bronco's are still in 1st placeOURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZMon Oct 07 1991 14:1911
Well I witnessed Dan Reeves version of the Run n' shoot yourself in the foot. 

The mistakes were pitiful Denver wanted a split in the Domes and that's what 
they got. The only bright spot was I didn't see any bodies get carried off the 
field other than Sean Farrel "shoulder". Denver did injure the Oilers though. 
The Houston team is tough,but unless Lee Williams comes back real soon they 
are hurting on the Defensive line. They should be able to hold off the rest of
the AFC Central this year. 



36.329COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Oct 07 1991 15:1310
      Well,  I guess I'm glad that I missed this game.  I turned on the
    tube at half time, and NBC was showing the score,  and I thought I was
    seeing a SB score.
    
      Yes,  thanks faiders for choking.  KC is next after a 1 week off.
    
      I think KC will win tonight, 'cause the bills defense isn't as good
    as they are made up to be.
    
    	Tim
36.330CELTIK::JACOBDIHMon Oct 07 1991 19:388
      I think all the AFC West will lose (or tie)next week. The only team that
    stands a chance at winning is the Broncos.  the "BYE" are playing good
    ball,  and if they don't choke in the 4th,  they might win it.
    
      A 8-8 season will win this division,  whomever it might be.
    
    JaKe
    
36.331But Humphrey's still here...BSS::JCOTANCHWed Oct 09 1991 12:206
    Broncos acquired 8-year veteran offensive tackle Harvey Salem from Detroit 
    for a 2nd or 3rd round pick in next year's draft, depending on how much he 
    plays this year.  He has played mostly right tackle in his career but
    calls left tackle his natural position.  He's 6-6, 290.
    
    Joe
36.332I had to enter thisMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Oct 09 1991 12:2925
	General Norman Schwartskopf was viewing the battlefield in the
	aftermath of Desert Storm when he kicked something in the sand.
	Upon closer inspection he noticed it was a lamp and began to
	rub it.  Out popped a genie who offered the general one wish.
	General Schwartskopf pulled out a map o the middle east and said

	"I would Like to have Eternal Piece for this entire region on
	this map".

	"Sorry" the genie replied "That would be Impossible"
	
	General Schwartskopf folded the map and began to walk away when
	"Hey Wait a minute" the genie called "You still have a wish"

	The General thought for a moment then said
	"I would like to see the Denver Broncos Actually win a SUPERBOWL"

	HHmmmmm the Genie Pondered...






		"Let me see that Map Again"
36.333Those type of jokes are older than the GenralCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Oct 09 1991 19:311
      re-1   I bet it took you all day to think that one up huh?
36.334Its a good joke if you not a denver gan...MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Oct 10 1991 09:554
    Actually there's proberbly 10 People in here that have already
    read that note, unless they never look on the back of that page
    that folds out :-)
    							M_Air
36.335Ridin' the pines?UFHIS::MENGLISHThu Oct 10 1991 11:163
    What's the story on Humphries? Did he get traded or will he be picking
    splinters out of his butt for the rest of the year? He was a high draft
    pick of mine in a homegrown version of fantasy football.
36.336BSS::JCOTANCHThu Oct 10 1991 11:3212
    Humphrey did not get traded and there's no indications that he'll be
    reporting any time soon.
    
    Jeff Mills hurt his knee in practice and will miss 4-6 weeks.  That
    means Croel will get most or all of the work at LOLB since Tim Lucas is
    already out with a broken leg.
    
    The Broncos signed former Pro-Bowl nose tackle Brian Sochia yesterday
    and waived DE Jim Szymanski.  Sochia was waived by Miami last week.
    
    
    Joe
36.337COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Oct 10 1991 14:0411
      Now with Sochia in,  does that mean Kragen might get less playin'
    time?  Kragen had a pro-bowl year in 89? ,but I don't think he does
    much for pass rushing.  of course most of the DL is something to be
    desired in pass situations.
    
      Symanszki is no loss.  Mills was having a good year so far.  To bad. 
    Did they bench Wymon yet?  I'm sure he got burned by the oilers many
    times (I didn't see the game)......
    
    
    	Tim
36.338CSC32::SALZERThu Oct 10 1991 17:064
    Looks like Bobby will have to sell some of his gold chains to
    make it throught the winter.
    
    BoB
36.339GENRAL::WADEThu Oct 10 1991 19:307
    
    	Denver also traded a conditional 2cd or 3rd round draft
    	pick ('92) to Detroit for an OT named Salem.  He's a
    	veteran lineman and will supposedly shore up the LT
    	position for Biff.
    
    	Claybroon
36.340eQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderTue Oct 15 1991 18:4341
    
     Well,Well, Well......
    
      I can only say that I am glad that I was in NYC and was fortunate
    enough to miss the debachle of a game for the DONKS.  I guess my fears
    from the Minny game came to pass a week late (I predicted a huge DONK
    Lose).  The only exposure I had to this game was from BACK BACK BERMAN
    on ESPN after the fact.  It sure looks like everything was even except
    the scoreboard and turnovers at the end of the game.  I know the DONKS
    are a better team than they showed when they played the Houscum Soilers
    weekend before last.
    
     At any rate,  I went out to NYC to visit family for a couple of weeks
    and when things got really boring I went over to the toxic waste dump
    on the other side of the river (Jersey) to visit our favorite Jesters
    Fan.  Thats right,  Jim "The PEE PEE SMOOCHER" Wardle is alive and
    well.  We went to the Jesters Vs Fish game and had a pretty good time.
    I do however have several complaints about the game.  
    
    		o you can't get more that 2 beers per person per run
    
    		o its low alcohol beers so you can't get buzzed
    
    		o the beer is $4.00 per 12 oz class
    
    		o the beer is warm
    
    		o they stop serving beer after the first half
    
     Now you teel me,  how the heck is a guy supposed to enjoy a football
    game in the "Big East Rutherford" when he can't even have 10 ice cold,
    big, alcohol saturated beers.  other than that I enjoyed the game.
    
     The only other complaint I have about the experience is that JoJ made 
    My girl friend, Dan Schnieder and Myself take the train back from
    Jersey late at night through the worst parts of both states.  The guy
    is so selfish.  I mean can you beleive it....  He risked our lives
    so he could get home in time to get to Jerry before he was out of the 
    mood.....   JoJ,  You're Scum !!
    
    Big game
36.341AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopWed Oct 16 1991 13:245
    	Big Game, Jo* told me over the phone that you were rooting
    passionately for the Jets that day and told him that you were always
    a closet Jets fan.  Is this true?
    
    				/Don
36.342JoJ is a *REAL* Girly Mon !!!!QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderWed Oct 16 1991 18:4314
    Why that scum sucking swine !!!  I was rooting for the Jesters but
    only becaue you won't make it out of the stadium alive if you don't.
    I told JoJ that I would be pretending to root for the happless Jesters
    for that reason and that reason only.  You guys wouldn't beleive the
    way JoJ get dresses up for the games.... It's really a scream !!!
    He wears this silly painters hat the has the Jesters logo on it. It's
    in such tough shape the Bums in central park have better.  Then he has 
    this jesters sweater that pretty nice until you see the liner his wife 
    put in it......  It's a picture of K-K-K-Kenny and The Jet(TM) right
    next to his heart.  To top it off he wears this Jesters Tu-Tu with
    Jests boxer shorts under it.  It really is a sight to see.  The sad
    part is that he's one of the more subdued when it come to dress.  
    
    Big Game
36.343Moved by ModOURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZThu Oct 17 1991 12:2563
           <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 204.0                   Denver Broncos Question                   5 replies
CRBOSS::ODELL                                        10 lines  16-OCT-1991 13:02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
                         Denver Bronco Question
    
     Can anyone give me a list of Tight Ends that are on the Broncos ?
    I'm in one of those franchise leagues and the only guy i can find
    for a tight end is Clarence Kay. 
    
    Any help would be greatly appreciated
    
    Steve O'Dell
================================================================================
Note 204.1                   Denver Broncos Question                      1 of 5
BSS::JCOTANCH "Go Air Force - Stun the Irish!"        6 lines  16-OCT-1991 15:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    In addition to Kay the Broncos have Sterling Sharpe and Reggie Johnson. 
    Sharpe is actually used more as an H-back, which is the 2nd tight end
    in Denver's offense.  It should also be pointed out that Denver uses
    their tight ends predominantly for blocking and rarely as receivers.
    
    Joe
================================================================================
Note 204.2                   Denver Broncos Question                      2 of 5
ANGLIN::KIRKMAN "What a WONDERFUL honeymoon"          4 lines  16-OCT-1991 18:40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Sterling Sharp plays for the Packers.  His brother plays for the
    Broncos.  (Don't know first name.)
    
    Commander Scott
================================================================================
Note 204.3                   Denver Broncos Question                      3 of 5
CELTIK::JACOB "Loaded for Bare-Cat"                   8 lines  16-OCT-1991 19:18
                                     -< \ >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    >>Sterling Sharp plays for the Packers.  His brother plays for the
    >>Broncos.  (Don't know first name.)
    
    "Nice N."
    
    JaKe
    
================================================================================
Note 204.4                   Denver Broncos Question                      4 of 5
GRANPA::DFAUST "Go for 1000% more"                    4 lines  16-OCT-1991 19:28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    re+ a few back
    
    Sterling's brother is Shannon.
    
================================================================================
Note 204.5                   Denver Broncos Question                      5 of 5
FSOA::JHENDRY "John Hendry, DTN 297-2623"             4 lines  17-OCT-1991 08:19
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This should be moved to either the Question and Answer note, or the
    Broncos note.
    
    John
36.344no mention of fines and such....COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Oct 17 1991 18:5910
      It's reported that Bobby Humphrey has reported to the Broncos Centre.
    Reeves & co have asked for a 2 week unable to play roster spot for him.
    Something like that anyway.
    
      I think this is great!  He won't be Denver's answer,  but he will
    help,  especailly in games against a good run defense.  He can run
    someone over where Green can't.  Hopefully he is in good shape,  and
    the year isn't blown.
    
    	Tim
36.345BSS::JCOTANCHGo Air Force - Stun the Irish!Fri Oct 18 1991 13:4211
    Humphrey has indeed reported and isn't in too bad of shape according to
    Reeves.  Says he got tired of watching football on TV (Probably also
    got tired of not getting those big paychecks).
    
    Another must win for Denver this Sunday against the Chiefs.  If Denver
    loses, they're gonna be playin' catchup in the division the rest of the
    year and will probably be relegated to competing for a wildcard. 
    They've got to win at least their home games against LA and KC to win
    the division.  Plus, KC has yet to lose a game in the division.
    
    Joe 
36.346CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 14:069
    Heard on the radio here in Colo Springs this am that Humphreys holdout
    will end up, when all is totalled up, costing him $300,000.
    
    Breaks my freakin heart.
    
    Money grubbing fools!!
    
    JaKe
    
36.347Nice outfit :-)SALEM::DODAThese are new days...Fri Oct 18 1991 14:432
I see Bobby had the Audra Barkley look for his press conference 
yesterday....
36.348COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Oct 18 1991 15:4027
      That was a very "tacky" looking outfit.  His haircut was funny,  and
    I don't feel sorry for him if Bowlen still makes him pay the fines.
    Still glad to have him back.  Will he be available to play this
    weekend even though it may be light duty?
    
      Now all Denver needs is a premier pass rusher,  and a good O left
    tackle.
    
      Now for KC,  Denver MUST stop the rush,  and then force Deberg to
    pass, which means a major pass rush.  I think Denver better play
    man-man and have 7-8 men up on the line almost every play.
    
      Look for Atwater and Smith making most of the plays.  If Meck plays
    well,  then Denver will stop the run.
    
      The OL better get the run blocking going or it will be a long day for
    Biff and a good day for Thomas....
    
      KC will not stomp Denvers butt like they did Miami and Buffalo. 
    Denver has a better defense than those teams,  plus its a home game, 
    thankfully!!
    
    	Tim
    
      Out on a limb with a prediction of:
    
       Broncos  24   KC  20
36.349ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Oct 18 1991 16:584
    
    Have the donks ever won an NFL championship?
    Have the donks beaten the DAWGS THIS year?
    
36.350Nice Doo, Bobby !!!! And The clothes are Killer !QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderFri Oct 18 1991 17:0025
    
     Well,  Booby H. Really looked nice at his press conference lasted(TM)
    night didn't he......  I don't know about these guys,  are the football
    players or fashion models !  Oh well,  it is nice to see him back.  I 
    just hope his return doesn't disrupt the rest of the team.  Also,  I
    think he should have to earn back his starting job,  Gaston has done 
    well for the Donks and should have to be knocked off the top by B.H.
    to lose his starting role.
    
     Now on the the dismal facts about Sundays game against the Chiefs.
    Look for the Donks to get thourghly dominated on the lines.  Mr. Ed
    will be running for his life all day and Atwater and Smith better eat
    their wheaties because the Nigerian Nightmare will be in Denvers
    secondary all day long.  Does this add up to a Donk lose you ask???
    Well,  not necessarily.  The Donks have a long histor of playing tough
    at home......  And K.C. and the Donks always seem to split or the Donks 
    win both....  Look for a low scoring roough and tumble game in the 
    Pile-it-High City this Sunday......  My Prediction
    
    
    			Donks 17
    
    			K.C.  13
    
    		Big Game
36.351CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 17:187
    re.349
    
    I guess now it must be "officially" football season.  The Groaner has
    arrived spewing the same toxic sewage he spews EVERY year.
    
    JaKe
    
36.352HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Oct 18 1991 17:273
       Has the groaner seen ANY CLeveland team win an important game in his
    lifetime?
                                        Denny
36.353QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderFri Oct 18 1991 17:306
    
     I don't think so.......  The Donks always seem to bring them back
    to reality when their head get a little swollen....  The Clowns are
    a bunch of good for nothin bums..
    
    Big Game
36.354CSC32::SALZERFri Oct 18 1991 19:046
    I don't think Bobby is home free just yet. He has created a lot
    of animosity out there. If he drops one pass, if he fumbles 1 ball,
    if he doesn't get a 100+ he will feel the wrath of Donkdom and that
    can be awfull painfull.
    
    BoB
36.355Be CarefulQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderFri Oct 18 1991 19:257
    BoB,
    
     I beleive you're right.....  DonkDom will come down hard on
    the Humpster if'n he screws up one little bit.  Let him cost 
    the Donks a game and they'll run him outa town !!
    
    Big Game
36.356Or everyone was out late celebratingSNDCSL::HAUSRATHRockin' in the Free WorldMon Oct 21 1991 14:352
    
    Must be a state holiday in Colorado today..   
36.357Death Grip RulesOURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZMon Oct 21 1991 15:5110
I just talked to Hoot Gibson to get his personal in-depth analysis...


The Denver death grip is alive and well. The Donks Cause a 4th and inches fumble 
KC recovers about 6 yrds down field. "FIRST DOWN". No from the sidelines Pat 
Blowind is phoning the replay booth. Scanning the archives they find the "Ken 
Stabler Forward" rule This gives the ball and the game to Denver. 
Typical game for the Stripes. 

Jeff 
36.358DEnver has better defense than Buffalo & Miami!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Oct 21 1991 17:2915
       Its not a holiday,  just sooooo busy,  that I shouldn't even be in
    here now.  
    
      Well Big game's and my predictions were close.  I think the Denver
    defensive line and linebackers did the best job I have seen from them.
    
      They put a hurt on Deberg all day long.  Even when he didn't get sacked,
    he was getting hit right after the ball left his hand.
    
      The officiating stunk.  The one killer was when a KC reviever trapped
    the ball, and it wasn't reviewed.  Then Shannon Sharpe did the same
    thing and of course it was ruled incomplete....o'well,  the Broncos
    won.
    
    
36.359Denver in 1st, who'd of thunk it.SNDCSL::HAUSRATHRockin' in the Free WorldMon Oct 21 1991 18:308
     <<< Note 36.358 by COMET::JACKSONTA "You forgot the Violin again!!" >>>
    >          -< DEnver has better defense than Buffalo & Miami! >-

    I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone to disagree with you
    on that one.  Both teams are hurtin' for defense this year.  
    
    Marty, the frustration continues! 
    
36.360GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreMon Oct 21 1991 18:3621
    re: officiating vs. Cheifs
    
    I was amazed that on the two big plays the officials in the replay
    booth got them right. It happens so little that I was simply amazed.
    The first replay showed that DeBerg was clearly down on one knee before
    he threw the TD pass, so the marked the ball where his knee touched
    rather that awarding KC a TD, with is what the on the field officials
    did.
    
    Later on the Okoye (sp) fumble, they field officials spotted the ball
    real poorly, the replay folks did a better job (but not perfect) and KC
    did not get the fist down (which was the correct call, IMO). The
    funniest part of that play was the measurement after they had the
    "precision" spot using the replay folks. 
    
    I agree that the trap catches were called poorly but as it turned out
    they didn't have an effect on the outcome. Both of the other call would
    have changed the number of points on the board. 
    
    Dennis
    
36.361Go Donks...... Big Bucks Coming My Way Today !QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeMon Oct 21 1991 19:0511
    
     The Donks played a great defensive game yesterday until the 
    middle of the 4th quarter when Williams started running all 
    over them.  I'll tell ya, it's a good thing for the donk faithful
    that Dennis "The Hammer" Smith knocked him out cold or I think
    there would have been a different outcome.  The Donks "D" but it
    to Deberg..... I'll bet he's still laying in bed today saying 
    "I'm to old for this sh*t
    
    Big Game
    
36.362New England 20-17CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RTue Oct 22 1991 11:042
	Any predictions on the Denver-New England game this week ?
	Anyone else think the Pats will beat the Donks in Foxboro ?
36.363hoping the Pats can pull it off, but...STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesTue Oct 22 1991 12:067
    Actually, the 27-17 Denver prediction in another note sounds about right
    to me....Broncos should take it but they'll have to earn it.
    
    FFL-related question -- is Bobby Humphrey expected to start on Sunday?
    
    
    py
36.364USCTR2::NAHEARNTue Oct 22 1991 14:2915
    Re: -1,
    
    I too am interested in finding out if Humphery will be *activated* for
    the Pats game.  As yet, he has not been added to their 'active roster'
    (the Broncos got a two week roster exemption).  It's likely too much to
    ask that he *start*, but I'd be psyched just to see him in the lineup!!
    
    My *starter* is Thurman Thomas, but he's off this week....and I'd
    like to be able to keep Humphrey...but I can't afford zeroes from my RB
    this week!!
    
    Any update as to Humphrey's status would be appreciated.
    
    
    Nelly
36.365BSS::JCOTANCHTue Oct 22 1991 14:4133
    
>    Later on the Okoye (sp) fumble, they field officials spotted the ball
>    real poorly, the replay folks did a better job (but not perfect) and KC
>    did not get the fist down (which was the correct call, IMO). The
>    funniest part of that play was the measurement after they had the
>    "precision" spot using the replay folks. 
 
    That's what killed me.  How can they spot the ball from replay on
    something like a measurement that often comes down to inches?  But even
    so, it was quite obvious that Okoye fumbled before he had the first
    down.
    
    What a pass by Elway.  3rd and 17, KC has the momentum, and it looks
    like Denver will punt and give the Chiefs good field position with
    about 5 minutes left to play.  Remind anyone of last year's 4th and 10
    pass against KC on Monday night?
    
    I was impressed with that Harvey Williams.  He's quick and has nice
    moves.  
    
    Croel is really starting to play well.  He had 2 crucial sacks on
    DeBerg.  If KC would've drove and tied the game and won, Denver
    would've looked back at 2 fumbles by KC that drive.  Both were
    recovered by the Chiefs.
    
    This week's game at NE this week is one many people think the Broncos
    should win, but NE is far from a sure win, especially at home.  Just
    ask Houston, who is possibly the AFC's best team.  This game was
    originally scheduled for 11 am when the schedules came out but has been
    changed to 2pm.
    
    
    Joe
36.366BSS::JCOTANCHTue Oct 22 1991 14:478
    I forgot to mention Humphrey.  He will probably be activated against
    the Pats but won't start and it's doubtful he will get in the game. 
    Gaston Green should be ready to start after missing the KC game. 
    
    Also, just read that Croel is 3rd in the AFC with 6 sacks.
    
    
    Joe
36.367Donks win a close one against the Upstart Patsies !QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeTue Oct 22 1991 15:037
    I already made my prediction for the Pats/Donks game.....
    
    Donks 27
    
    Pats  17
    
    Big Game
36.3682pm mtn time, are you sure Joe?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Oct 22 1991 20:0717
      KC fumbled 4x in this game,  and recovered all of them.  I think that
    is lucky!
    
      Denver should win this game.  The Patsies don't seem to be a cake
    walk,  especially beating the Oilers and Vikes.  Did they beat Indy for
    the 3rd win?
    
      Denver has the better all around team,  but like Hunter sayd, the
    Donks like to always take it to the wire no matter the opponent.
    
        My prediction:
    
    
      Denver 24  Pats  13
    
    
        Tim
36.369BSS::JCOTANCHTue Oct 22 1991 21:013
>                     -< 2pm mtn time,  are you sure Joe? >-
    
     Positive.
36.370BSS::JCOTANCHFri Oct 25 1991 13:5014
    Gaston Green's thigh is still bothering him and Lewis will likely start
    in his place.  Humphrey should see considerable playing time.
    
    DE Ron Holmes is bothered by a knee and Kenny Walker will start in his
    place.
    
    If Denver's going to win the division they need to do 2 things: win
    7 or 8 games at home and win 3 or 4 on the road.  They're 1-2 on the
    road now with games left at KC and at Seattle among others.  I'll be
    very happy if they can go 4-4 on the road.  If Denver can get this one
    at NE they're in great shape at the midway point of the season at 6-2.
    
    
    Joe 
36.371USCTR2::NAHEARNFri Oct 25 1991 14:574
    Has Humphrey been officialy (sp?) activated yet?
    
    
    Nelly
36.372Not yet.OURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZFri Oct 25 1991 16:334
He will be activated and WILL play Sunday. 


Just not officially.
36.373CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Fri Oct 25 1991 16:365
36.374QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeFri Oct 25 1991 17:444
    Should be an interesting game....  donks by ten !!
    
    
    
36.375Duller than Good Morning AmericaOURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZFri Oct 25 1991 19:4814
 Should be an interesting game....  donks by ten !!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dream on Cacti !!!


It'll be over by halftime. John Henry's highlight will be counting the Pats 1st 
downs on 1 hand. 


Skiing at Keystone's 1000' snow puddle will be more exciting.

Jeff    
    
    
36.376Elway is a great player thoughCTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSMon Oct 28 1991 10:498
    Lucky SOB's.  What a whiny miserable bunch the Donks are. Bitched and
    moaned to da refs all day. WAAAAAH WAAAAAH. Reeves is a foot-stampin'
    crybaby( as are half the team) GO KC, Raiders, anybody but the "I want
    my Maypo" Donks. 
    
    
    MikeL
    
36.377FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Oct 28 1991 11:227
    Yo, Jeff Riggen - at least get the name right - it's Hendry, not Henry. 
    I'm not a steel driving man, nor a horse nor a fashion designer.
    
    It was an exciting game, too.  I'm glad my physical is Wednesday
    instead of today otherwise I'd be off the blood pressure meter.
    
    John
36.378Pats will have another shot at them in Mile HighCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 28 1991 11:232
36.379GRANPA::DFAUSTDon't drink the KoolaidMon Oct 28 1991 11:4018
    
    I watched the game a couple of things stood out to me. The OL for the
    Pats really opened some big holes and the RB realy took advantage. The
    Broncos almost blew it by going into a prevent defense and not putting
    any pressure on the QB during the last drive. Foxboro Stadium is a
    mess. Turf was flying up on every step from the git go. Did they have a
    college or HS game there earlier this weekend, or is the field just a
    piece of crap?
    
    Who was brain dead, McPherson or the QB? I can't believe that Dick
    didn't tell him about a million time during the last timeout to throw
    the ball away during the last play if there wasn't a receiver open. I
    heard someone on the radio (in Philadelphia) say that the Patriots
    should have started a fight or something to draw a flag (and get the
    clock stopped). The worst coaching and stupid play I've seen in a
    while, and I see the Eagles every week.  :*)
    
    Dennis
36.380MCIS1::DHAMELB-ay-bay, B-E-beeMon Oct 28 1991 12:2516
    
    To:  The Denver Broncos Football Club
         Denver, Colorado
    
    Sirs:
    
         I am pleased to announce that one (1) NFL win has been donated
    in your name on behalf of the New England Patriots Football Club.
    
         We hope you will appreciate the generosity of this gift
    in your quest for a successful season.
    
    Best wishes,
    
    Hugh Millen, PHD (Patriots for High Draft)
    
36.381What can you do....MR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Oct 28 1991 12:5110
    Calling this a gift is being too generous.... First the Blocked FG
    from 25 yrds....Did we forget what play they were suppose to be
    blocking for ??? Then Hugh...Please, who do you think you are
    FLUTIE...????  Throw the ball into the back of the end zone....
    DONT THROWN an INTERCEPTINO, DONT GET SACKED and do not attempt
    to run from 20 yrds out !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The should be 4-4
    pats, plus the disgracefull loss to the browns...we could be
    looking at a 5-3 instead of a 3-5 very, very, very disapointed...
    
    							M-A-Brooks
36.382a win is a winCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Oct 28 1991 13:0619
      Well FWIW,  The donks played awefull offense.  I don't want to take
    the credit away from the pats DL,  but the offense looked slow and
    looking for a clue.
    
      Elway should have torn the defensive backs up, since NE has(d) the
    worst pass defense in the NFL.
    
      That offsides on Elway was bogus IMO.
    
      I agree that the prevent defense means prevent yourself from winning
    instead of the other team.  When Denver had the Pats in 3 and 14 on the
    last drive,  why in the heck would they only rush 4 guys?  Put pressure
    on a rookie(?) QB,  and he will do the Jay Shroeder act of choking.
    
    
        It was very ugly from a Bronco stand point,  and look for the donks
    to do better in mile hi Dec 1st.
    
       Tim
36.383An ugly game but a win nonethelessBSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 28 1991 13:2434
    
    Do they get any uglier than this?  This one probably rivaled the 6-6
    tie between Oklahoma State and Iowa State.  Rather than a defensive
    battle I prefer to call it a battle of inept offenses.  How about
    Denver's 1st and goal right before half.  Was that maybe their all-time
    worst goal-line blunder?  Had to be.
    
>    Broncos almost blew it by going into a prevent defense and not putting
>    any pressure on the QB during the last drive. 

    Yes.  And doesn't this seem to be a regular statement every Monday
    morning?
    
>    Foxboro Stadium is a mess. Turf was flying up on every step from the 
>    git go. 
    
    The Denver radio announcers said that many of the Patriots have
    complained about the field.  I'm sure visiting teams aren't too happy
    with it either.
    
    I guess there were a couple good plays by Denver.  Elway & Jackson made
    a great on that 3rd and long on the game-winning FG drive.  Denver had
    one real nice drive in the first quarter, but that ended in a FG. 
    Lewis ran real well on that drive.  Russell is turning into a good
    receiver.
    
    Vance returning punts is a joke.  A guy who's afraid to get hit sure as
    hell shouldn't be returning punts.  About the only good thing about him
    is he's pretty dependable at catching and holding onto the ball.  I
    can't believe Reeves cut Clark.  He may be one-dimensional, but he's
    the only player resembling a punt/kick returner they had.
    
    
    Joe
36.384BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 28 1991 13:345
    RE: .380
    Just like the Faiders have been handed 2 bullshit wins by Kemp and
    Everett the past 2 weeks.
    
    Joe
36.385Vance Johnson on the Plus.OURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZMon Oct 28 1991 13:505
The advantage of having Vance Johnson is he does have good hands. Late in the 
game he made a diving catch for 5 yrds. This play hasn't worked with Russell
yet. 


36.386CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 28 1991 13:5511
    This is the first yaer with natural turf in Foxboro.  They had to rush
    to get it in for the international soccer matches.  It will be better
    next year.  Another growing season should help.
    
    The Pats did a good job of covering the Bronco receivers, but a poor
    job of containing the scrambling Elway.  Then again, they couldn't have
    done too badly since they didn't allow a TD to one of the top 10
    offenses in the AFC.
    
    This is the second week in a row that the Pats have had a FG blocked. 
    The special teams have to produce better than that.
36.387QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeMon Oct 28 1991 17:247
    
     Well,  Looked like the donks were just going to march on the
    patsies alll day until they pulled their standard gag inside the five 
    and had to settle for an FG.....  You can tell Revees is callin the 
    friggen plays again...  Go Donks !!!!  First place and holding tight !!
    
    Big Game
36.388CSC32::SALZERThu Oct 31 1991 16:3214
    Half season wrap up.
    
    Donks just cant seem to put anyone away. Cinci in the home opener  
    was a blow out and it caught me off gaurd. Since then the Bengals
    have proven that that was not a fluke. Every game there after has
    been a nail biter except for the Oilers game. I'm still confused
    as to just how good or bad these guys are but at 6-2 they have 
    exceeded everybody's expectations. This is a very big IF, but
    IF Denver can beat Pitts, and IF Denver can win the following 2
    games, the AFC West is settled for the season with 5 games remaining.
    Let the rest fight for wild card spots and Denver can fight for 
    homefield advantage throughout. It's unbelievable.
    
    BoB   
36.389BSS::JCOTANCHThu Oct 31 1991 17:3341
    
>    Donks just cant seem to put anyone away. 

    But we know this isn't anything new, unfortunately.
    
>    IF Denver can beat Pitts, and IF Denver can win the following 2
>    games, the AFC West is settled for the season with 5 games remaining.
 
    True, but that would mean winning at KC, which I consider doubtful at
    best.  They should beat Pittburgh; a loss to the Steelers could turn
    this season into a disaster in a hurry.  After that a key home game
    against the Faiders.  A win against LA would do 2 things: put the Faids
    virtually out of the division race at 3 games out, and Denver could
    afford to lose the next 2 on the road (at KC, at Sea), which wouldn't
    surprise me at all.  That 2-game road will be very crucial not only for
    Denver's divison title chances but also if they don't beat both
    Pittsburgh and LA.  But right now a split in the upcoming 2-game road
    stretch will be considered a good accomplishment IMO.
    
>   Let the rest fight for wild card spots and Denver can fight for 
>   homefield advantage throughout. 

    This is looking way ahead, but right now I would say the best Denver
    could hope for is a bye in the first week of the playoffs.  To get
    homefield throughout the playoffs they would need a lot of help.  Houston
    only has 1 loss and has beaten Denver, so in essence they're 2 games
    ahead of Denver.  Denver could possibly tie Buffalo and win a
    tiebreaker but the Bills probably won't lose a heck of a lot more
    playing in the AFC East.  And I expect Denver will at least 2 or 3 more
    games.
    
    Back to the present and this week's game against Pittsburgh.  The
    Steelers are only averaging 25:25 in time of possession and their
    opponenets have converted 47% of 3rd down plays.  They also haven't
    forced a turnover in their last 3 games.
    
    Green is still bothered by a pulled thigh muscle and is doubtful for
    the Steeler game.
    
    
    Joe
36.3906-10 still beats last year.OURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZThu Oct 31 1991 18:136
I still shiver when I think of Merrill Hoge running for 140+ yrds lasted year
in a total blowout against Denver. 

Pittsburgh is not a bad team and Denver could wimp out in the cold night air 
this week. 

36.391Riggen: The Eternal PessimistBSS::JCOTANCHThu Oct 31 1991 19:121
    
36.392Steelers shouldn't be much of a problem for DenverSHALOT::MEDVIDbe still be calm be quiet nowFri Nov 01 1991 10:0613
>Pittsburgh is not a bad team and Denver could wimp out in the cold night air 
>this week. 
    
    The hell they aren't a bad team.  Pittsburgh has beaten no one of any
    substantial talent this season.  They aren't impressive, they make too
    many mistakes, and they don't exploit the big talents of the best tight
    end in the league.
    
    Elway should have a big day against a suspect secondary and lack of
    pass rush.
    
    	--dan'l
    
36.393It supposed to be 10 above without wind chillCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Nov 01 1991 15:384
      Quit hexing the Broncos Dan'l;^  You know Denver almost always plays
    to the level of their opponent.
    
    	Tim
36.394CSC32::SALZERFri Nov 01 1991 16:229
    All I'm saying in .388 is at the half way point Denver is in 1st.
    A 3-0 start in the second half locks the AFC West cahmpionship.
    I'm not blowing smoke here. We all know that won't be easy but it 
    is within the relm of possibility. I like their position. I also 
    like the fact that most everybody is still focusing on KC and LA with
    Denver sitting on top quiet like mice. Now is the time for the Broncos
    to wake up. 
    
    BoB
36.395let sleeping broncos lieGENRAL::WADEGimme the beat boysFri Nov 01 1991 20:254
    
    	Don't wake 'em up Bob!  They're doing just fine sleeping.  :*)
    
    	Claybroon
36.396COBRA::DINSMORESay goodnight to musicMon Nov 04 1991 02:539
    God, i hate to say this, but Elway looked better than ever, on the run
    
    and throwing the ball... Green drops a pass that would have probaly put
    
    game into OT.. DONKS WIN.. 20-13..
    
    
    DINZ
    
36.3977-2, full game leadBSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 04 1991 14:0426
    You know, just once I'd like to relax in the 4th quarter and enjoy an
    easy Bronco victory.  But instead, after having numerous opportunites
    to be ahead by 2 or 3 scores, Denver makes it a close one again and
    continues to give me premature gray hairs.  Not to take anything away 
    from Pittsburgh and O'Donnell mind you.  
    
    I was very pleased with how well Denver came back quickly after being
    down 10-zip.  But after getting 2 TD's on scoring drives, they had to
    settle for FG attempts on their next 3 scoring opportunities, missing
    the last one.  
    
    Lewis ran great, sure making things look good in the backfield now. 
    Elway missed some open open receivers but made a couple good runs and a
    typical Elway play late in the game where he almost got sacked at his
    own 5 and completed a first-down up to around mid-field.  I also liked
    seeing all the pressure on O'Donnell.
    
    On Denver's last drive Jackson was definitely interefered with on a
    long pass from Elway.  That would've put Denver down around the 20 and
    probably would've sewed things up.  
    
    These last 3 games have been nailbiters and could've gone either way,
    but these are the type of games they were losing last year.
    
    
    Joe
36.398Donks on the road to the AFC Championship game !!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 04 1991 15:1118
    After last nights performance there can be nodoubt that the Donks 
    will be atop the AFC west at seasons end.  They really seem to be
    coming around but still lack the ability to put a team away.  The 
    squeelers played a good game and made it more interesting than I
    like it to be.  Elway seems to be playing well and baring injury
    will carry the donks to the AFC championship game.  The Donks need
    to continue to improve to be on a plane that will allow them to 
    make another Superbowl appearance.  I have to say,  I am suprised to 
    see them at 7-2 after last years debachle of a season.  The donks
    are a great team with a great QB......   A little more maturity in
    both backfields and they will be a dynasty !!!  ;^)
    
    Big Game
    
    P.S.  O'Donnel is going to be a good QB for the Squeelers !!!  The guy
    has poise and plays the leadership role well especially for his age.
    Look for the Squeelers to dominate the central nexted(tm) year !!
    
36.399COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Nov 05 1991 12:0313
       I didn't like seeing the donks let the squeelers back in!  Elway did
    miss some key passes.
    
       I also think the offense is sputtering because Reeves is calling
    the majority of plays.  Elway & co better have it together for the
    faids next week,  or it will be a long game.
    
      Joe,  expect another 4th qtr "prevent" and let the other team in the
    game, but hang on enough to win type of game against the faids.  I was
    hoping to go,  but its the 1st of the month "no money" blues.
    
    
    	Tim 
36.400CSC32::SALZERTue Nov 05 1991 16:195
    It's been close to 2 years since Denver has been invoveled in 
    anything resembeling a big game. This week's Raiders at Broncos
    will tell the tale. 
    
    BoB
36.401Donks a shoe in !QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 05 1991 16:369
    
     It's already in the bag!!!  I'm going to the game and
    the Donks always win when I'm there.  Can't recall ever
    attending a game in which they lost !!
    
    Big Game (Whos Going to The Big Game)
    
    Donks 31
    Faids 24
36.402Is Big Game really The Barrel Man?GENRAL::WADEGimme the beat boysTue Nov 05 1991 16:455
    
    	No way they'll score that many points Cacti.  As usual,
    	it'll be 16-13 or so for whoever wins.
    
    	Claybroon
36.403QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 05 1991 18:116
    Hey ClayWade....
    
     The Donks are going to break it open soon.....  This game
    is as good as any for that to happen !! I stick by my prediction
    
    Big Game
36.404Don't forget overtimeCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Nov 06 1991 17:4520
      Jack,   did you forget about the time 6 of us went to that Monday
    nite game against the faids????
    
      Does a 24-0 half time lead for the Broncos strike any bad memmories? 
    Some guy in the faids o-backfield named smith decided he would learn
    how to run.
    
      Remember the 35 min trip between the springs and denver and how we
    went about getting tickets......As buzzed as I got that nite,  I don't
    know how I remmebered;^
    
    
    
       Don't hex the donks;^*()*^$@~!
    
    
    	Tim...who might be going,  but will have to get tix the same
    way....scallpers(sp?).....
    
    
36.405Funny how you forget the bad QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerWed Nov 06 1991 18:567
    
     OH CRAP !!!    Thats right...  I had forgot all about that
    one.....  Must be selective Memory !!   Oh well,  looks like
    I may not be able to make the game this weekend anyhow.....
    Something came up and I'm still trying to get out of it.
    
    Big Game
36.406CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 06 1991 21:5911
    It had been years since I witnessed a loss at home too untill last 
    year's Raiders game. It wasn't that cold but it was really windy
    and that drove 1/2 the fans out with about 5 min left. Donks down
    by 10 but wait, they drive to close within 3. Donks hold the Faids
    and drive for the winning or tieing score. Faids' deathgrip stops
    Donks so Treadwell scoots out for a medium range FG. The snap, the
    kick, it's on the way, it's NO GOOD!  Seemed to be the pattern they
    were in last season but right now their on a 3 game win streak and 
    a 6 game win streak at home. 
    
    BoB 
36.407Yesssss!!!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Mon Nov 11 1991 10:0611
    There you have it, the men have been separated from the boys.
    Art Shell still owns Elway and Co., and Reeves still doesn't 
    have a clue.....:-) God I love Monday morning noting after the
    Raiders beat the Donks (even in New England). The only bad part
    about it is that now I gotta listen to the Donk fans snivel about
    how Uncle Al paid off the refs, and all the other lame excuses.
    With a Raider win next week, and some help from the Chiefs, the
    Raiders should be tied for first.
    
    Carlos
    
36.40817-16 great game.OURGNG::RIGGENRiggamotis RULEZMon Nov 11 1991 12:515
Art Shell has taught the Denver Death grip to his offensive line. Denver let 
this one get away. The running game was great on both sides of the ball Craig, 
Lewis, Allen and Green forced both defenses to team tackle. 

Jeff 
36.409BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 11 1991 13:1752
    
    Typical Bronco-Faid game that could've gone either way in the end. 
    Amazing that these games are almost always so close and low-scoring. 
    The most glaring stats for Denver yesterday: terrible special teams and
    3 turnovers (to no turnovers for LA).  Those turnovers and woeful
    special teams play wiped out a good rushing performance by Denver. 
    It's not too often you will see a team rush for 200 yards and lose. 
    The defense did a good job of keeping Denver in the game in the 3rd
    quarter.  Denver turned the ball over on 2 straight posessions, once
    inside their own 5-yard line, but the Faids only ended up with 3 points
    off the 2 turnovers.  The Faiders defense is obviously keeping them in
    playoff contention this year.  What is the Faid offense averaing,
    around 15 points per game?
    
    Although the offense may have missed a scoring opportunity or two in
    the first half, their special teams was undoubtedly the biggest factor
    in this devastating loss.  Witness these mistakes:
    
    - A punt that was nearly blocked in the 2nd quarter.  The LA player ended 
    up running into Horan and gave Denver a first down but it should've
    been blocked.
    
    - A holding on a punt on the 3rd quarter that, after the penalty, ended
    up giving the Faiders 20 more yards of field position.  LA scored the
    go-ahead TD on that drive.
    
    - The blocked extra point.
    
    - The blocked field goal at the end, which wouldn't have counted anyway
    because Kay was flagged for holding and the game would've ended right
    then and there.
    
    Plus the fact that Gossett had a marvelous day punting for LA.
    
    If Denver is to win the division, I say they need a split in these next
    2 road games, something I don't think they will do.  They will almost
    definitely lose at KC next week.  At this point I hope they can at
    least get the first wild-card slot and play 1 game at home.  Obtaining
    the best or second-best record in the AFC and a first-round bye in the
    playoffs is just about out of reach right now.  This loss killed 'em. 
    
>    With a Raider win next week, and some help from the Chiefs, the
>    Raiders should be tied for first.
    
    First of all, the Faiders will still be a game behind KC after they
    beat Denver next week.  And that's if they beat America's team, the
    Seahawks.  Secondly, if you were smart you would be pulling for Denver
    because the Faids already have the upper hand over them with the sweep
    and the Broncos have to play 4 of their last 6 on the road.
    
    
    Joe 
36.410$%^*#%^&#$&%^&#$%^&#$%^QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 11 1991 13:2616
    
     AAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHH
    
     Did you see all those 50 dollar bills Uncle Al was handing out. !!
    This was another good Bronco/Faider Game...  The Donks let it get away
    from `em....  Hard to beleive that Dan is 0-5 against Art.  Oh well,
    The donks could have wrapped it up with this win and a win against
    K.C nexted(tm) week but as is their usual fashion they will have
    to drag it out till the end.  Both teams played well and in all 
    honesty I thik the bad calls evened out in the end with the exception
    of that damn so called fumble at the goal line....  Good Job Donks...
    The faids are once again a BIG problem of the DONKS....
    
    Give me my crow Raw.....  I like that way !!
    
    Big Game
36.411What can you say other than "CLASSIC"COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Nov 11 1991 13:3015
      I was there and give the game ball to the faider special teams.  I
    wouldn't go so far to say the boys and men are seperated.  The game
    was obviously even with the exception of all the blocked kicks.
    
      Biff did not have a good day throwing.  He had open recievers that he
    missed.   Turnovers were critical,  especially that fumble in Denvers
    own end of the field.
    
      All in all,  it was nothing less than was expected between these 2
    teams.
    
      Denver needs to win next week @KC if they want to win the division. 
    If they lose (which is likely), then wild card looks more like reality.
    
    	Tim
36.412Denver is a probable wild card now :^(BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 11 1991 21:1919
    Tim, I don't think Denver necessarily has to win at KC next week but
    they need a win at Seattle and then at San Diego because those 2 are
    division games.  11-5 might take the divison and is probably the best
    Denver can hope for at this point.  And they can go 11-5 by winning
    their remaining 2 home games and splitting their 4 road games.  The
    Faiders will definitely lose at least 2 more games.  I also believe KC
    has a tough road ahead but the Chiefs would probably win a tiebreaker
    over Denver because they would probably end up with a better division
    record than Denver (assuming KC beats Denver next week).  The best
    (realistically) Denver will do in the division is 5-3, while the Chiefs
    have only lost 1 division game so far.  But KC still has to play at LA
    and at Seattle (I think).  
    
    Hey Big Game, what happened to your perfect record of Denver never
    losing when you're there?  Did you make it up to the game.  We were
    counting on you and you let us down.
    
    
    Joe
36.413Didn't make it but Tim was there !!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 11 1991 21:4917
    DAMN !!!   I didn't make it up.....  Had some other stuff come
    up and just couldn't justify the game in light of the situation.
    At any rate....  Tim pointed out that he and I attended a game 
    at Mile High which the Donks lost.....  Some how my selective
    memory let me over look that sad event.  Oh well,  So the donks get 
    swept by art and the Faids....  I still think that the Donks will
    win the division and surely finish the season with a better record
    than the Faids.....  That all I need to take som $$$ for Uncle Hootsie.
    Can't wait to collect on that one....  Hootsie really hate to pay
    off on Donk Bets   
    
    
    Go Donks !!
    
    
    Big Game
    
36.41456590::LEARYBetter than LDSTue Nov 12 1991 11:227
    Denver as a possible wild card?
    
    I thought someone in this here conf. guaranteed Cleveland a wildcard
    What gives? 8^)
    
    MikeL
    
36.415No `Spots in this topicQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 12 1991 13:1211
     How dare you mention the name of the lowly Browns Spots in this 
    topic....  To even have the `Spots name in here is a slam to the
    mighty Broncos....   ;^)   The Spots are going no where but home
    for X-Mas this year.  The Donks on the other hand are going to win 
    AFC west or at worst take home a wildcard spot for the `offs.....
    Don't really matter...  I honestly don't think they have the team
    to win beyond the first round anyhow unless they pick up the offense
    and get more presure on the QB's on defense....  The donks will
    have a good year....  unlike the `Spots !
    
    Big Game
36.416BSS::JCOTANCHTue Nov 12 1991 14:038
    It's good to see that the Raiders, unlike some of their fans, showed
    some class after the game.  Art Shell said, "This just brings Denver
    back to us.  Instead of being two games behind, we're just one."  Howie
    Long said, "We're lucky."  Bob Golic said, "There's no domination
    involved.  We beat them...but it's a battle every time we play them."
    
    
    Joe
36.417REeves actually questioned his own play callingCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Nov 12 1991 15:4118
      There was no domination!  The faids did just enough to get by which
    the Broncos have done in some games.  This time it caught up to them
    (denver).
    
      If you look at the stats,  you would wonder how the faids were in the
    game,  but as typical of the faids, "just win baby" no matter what it
    looks like.   Turnovers decided this game,  and Perryman should get a
    splinter;^
    
    
      Joe,  you are right about next weeks game,  but if the Broncos beat
    KC and end up the year tied with KC,  then I believe Denver has the
    advantage of beating them 2x.
    
      I think 11-5 is possible,  but with the offense studdaring (sp?)
    10-6 is most likely.
    
    	TTim
36.418Give the Donks a real schedule and they're 4-5 at best...CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorTue Nov 12 1991 18:3322
 Well I'm a day late but not a dollar short on laughs..

 hahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaa

 last week they're winning the division, this week it's just a wildcard...
 perch and twirl perch and twirl my my...

 Did the mighty Donks really loose to WRONG_WAY Schroeder again?

 ;^)

 and where was that phatom hold on the Raiders' TD? did ya get a number
 on that guy ref? As usual in Pile it High when the situation is critical
 the donks get the flags...

 gotta make ya wonder...

 thanks BG for all the copliments about the Steelers if I was you I'd hop
 of this sinking ship now and join a real team....

 mike
36.419You are only heard from when denver loses and sqeelers winCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Nov 12 1991 20:3229
       re-1  If you want BG to jump ship to a real team,  I would think
    he'd choose the 'skins, which he can't stand.  What other team is
    dominating most everyone in the league?
    
      What is a real schedule?  Dont tell me the squeelers have one....They
    play one good team 2x a year and 2 bad teams 2x a year.  Besides,  the
    broncos had the squeelers and the rest of the AFC central on their
    schedule,  so this must mean the afc central aren't "real" teams!!
    
     
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Actually nevermind all this,  'cause I forgot the source,  and this
    source knows how to start the spew and get the denver fans riled.....
    
    
     Go pay for a playoff birth hosehead;^
    
    	Tim
36.420works like a charm. EVERYTIME!!! ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorTue Nov 12 1991 20:5513
 Tim how can you say that I so deeply hurt...



NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've always bellied up to the CC when it's been my turn...

this year I just haven't had the time to note like previous years as I've
been trying to save DEC all by myself...

many smiles
36.421Looks like Denver's *much* better than you expectedBSS::JCOTANCHTue Nov 12 1991 21:0741
    Well Mike C., it looks like you were way off on your wishful thinking
    that Denver would go 1-15.  7 wins already with 6 games to go, looks
    like they will surpass your expecatations by a mile.  Here's your
    prediction in case you forgot:
    
    
           <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 175.10               NFL '91 Magazine Predictions                  10 of 33
MAXWEL::CHILDS "sign said, Stay Away Fool.."         27 lines  18-JUL-1991 13:54
              -< I got as much chance of being right as they do, >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 1991 Insider Noter Sports Rag

 NFC East		NFC Central 		NFC West
----------		-----------		---------
Giants  13-3		Vikings 10-6		San Fran 12-4
Philly  10-6		Bears   10-6		Saints	  9-7
Cowboys  9-7		Packers  9-7		Falcons   6-10
Redskins  8-8		Tampa    8-8            Rams      5-11
Cards    4-12           Lions    7-9

AFC East		AFC Central		AFC West
--------		-----------		--------
Bills 13-3		Steelers 10-6		Chiefs 11-5
Colts 11-5		Oilers   10-6		Raiders 10-6
Dolphins 9-7	        Bengals   8-8           Chargers 8-8
Pats   5-11             Browns    3-13          Seahawks 6-10
Jets   2-14					Denver   1-15


 wildcards Philly over the Bears, Colts over the Oilers.

 NFC Championship Giants over Frisco

 AFC Championship Steelers over the Bills

 Giants over the Steelers in the Bowl.....
    
36.422CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEWed Nov 13 1991 09:124
    So, the Donks are now 0 for the last 6 meetings with the Raiders.  Is
    that right?
    
    lEe
36.423BSS::JCOTANCHWed Nov 13 1991 11:228
>    So, the Donks are now 0 for the last 6 meetings with the Raiders.  Is
>    that right?
   
    No.  The Faiders have won the last 5 meetings.
    
    
    Joe 
 
36.424CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorWed Nov 13 1991 11:478
 yeah Joe. it's like freakin incredible isn't it.  I mean I'm hardly ever
 wrong about this things. Especially cause I use my head and not my heart
 on these things. 

 ;^)

 
36.425Squeelers = Worst team in NFL !QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerWed Nov 13 1991 11:5213
    Childs.....  You're a Butthead !!!   ;^)
    
     I can't beleive you didn't see that big time hold by the right 
    guard on the Faider TD....  It was huge !!  I got a few more more
    for ya too.  The so called fumble on the three yard line was a 
    bunch of crap....  The man was down way before the ball came out.
    Funny thing is I saw Uncle Al handing out 50's to the zebras just
    before this happened.  Then ther were the 2 big pass int calls, or 
    should I say non-calls that would have helped the Donks convert 
    important 3rd downs. IMO,  the Zebras seemed like they came from
    LA LA land insetead of Denver !  Why don't you wake up Mikey? 
    
    Big Game
36.4261-15, you should know better than thatCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Nov 13 1991 14:164
      From the looks of your predictions Mike,   you might be on track for
    1-2 teams.  The rest look like you are off.   The sqeelers going 10-6?
    Its still possible,  but unlikely.  Maybe 6-10 would be more like
    it;^^)
36.427CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEWed Nov 13 1991 14:278
    5-0, huh?  Thanks, Joe.  I musta heard it after the game, instead of
    before.
    
    Hey, what's a few days matter, anyway?  It's Wed, and that's almost
    Friday, ain't it?  :*)
    
    lEe
    
36.428Boy it's times like this I really miss Uncle Hoot and the Parrot...AXIS::ROBICHAUDCawowina BwueWed Nov 13 1991 16:231
    
36.429COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Nov 13 1991 17:386
    re-1   I kinda miss them too (ugh).   There were some faider faithfuls
    in here last year and at the start of this season,  but now that the
    faids are 3rd in the west,  the faithfuls vanish,  kinda like Hal and
    Gronowski.   Carlos is an occasional exception;^)
    
       Tim
36.430CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 13 1991 17:5713
    GRACK! UGH! Groan! That was some kind of weird hard hitting 
    game. 'Bonehaid' awards were well deserved and deserving 
    candidates were plentifull but when it comes down to a 1 point
    game it's easy to point the finger. I give an honorary Bonhaid
    to uncle Al for his lip synch rendition of the 'F' word on
    national TV. It was classic. TV showed a lot of pushing and 
    shoving. Spectators stated there was a lot of extraneous 
    activity also. One Raider was spoted with his helmet twisted 
    over his haid like his nose was poking out of the ear hole.
    He riped that brainbucket off and they said he was some kind
    of PO'd. Oh well, boys will be boys.
    
    BoB 
36.431COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Wed Nov 13 1991 18:0913
      No doubt Bob.  There was pushing after almost every play.  This guy I
    was sitting next to hadn't been to a donk faids game before,  and I
    told him this was normal for these 2 teams when head to head.
    
      I was waiting for either Kay or Widell to get tossed,  'cause they
    seemed to be in about half of the shoving matches,  and I think it was
    Kay that actually pushed a ref out of the way so he could inflict
    damage to his hand by hitting a faider in the helmet.  I thought for
    sure that ref was going to point him in the direction of the showers, 
    but the ref just jumped right back into the action.  I think some of
    the refs like getting involved.
    
    	Tim
36.432CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorWed Nov 13 1991 19:1810
 the one that should have got tossed was Atwater. The kid is a great hitter
 but he's also cheap. More than once he speared somebody late. I know on one
 particular instance Craig wanted to rip into...

 as for where was when and where BG, I was splittin time between this game
 and the Giants game. Even as a Jints' fan I'd have to rate this game as 
 the better affair sunday...

 mike
36.433Steveie is a good boyQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerThu Nov 14 1991 12:349
    
     Mike...  I can't beleive you are calling Atwater a Cheep shot.  The
    guy is a great hitter, as you said...  But to call him a cheep shot
    cause he came in late on one play is beyond me.  I have been watching
    him play since he joind the Donks and have never seen him pull
    a really bad cheep shot....  Everyone goes a bit overboard at time 
    but only a few a cronic about it and Atwater ain't one of `em
    
    Big Game
36.434Envious?COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Nov 14 1991 15:004
      Mikie just wishes the sqeelers had all pro safeties like denver does. 
    Denver has 2 of the best safeties in the league, IMO!
    
    	Tim
36.435QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerThu Nov 14 1991 15:103
    Agreed !!   YOu know them damn Squeelers don't have no talent !!
    
    Big Game
36.436RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSo, are we having a recession yet??Thu Nov 14 1991 16:305
    The best defensive backfield performer in the Steelers/Broncos game
    will wear a Steelers uniform - Cornerback Rod Woodson.  And you cain
    take that to the bank (if you cain find one that's solvent...)
    
    JD
36.437CSC32::SALZERThu Nov 14 1991 16:579
    There is probably a fine line between chippy vs cheap vs intimidation.
    The Raiders have always prided themselves on the intimidation factor
    that they believe they hold over other teams. Denver has never 
    bought into their line of thinking. The intensity of this rivalry
    had appeared to have been on the decline, that is, untill
    last sunday. Maybe we get to see these two again this season.
    That could be a good one. 
    
    BoB 
36.438CELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinThu Nov 14 1991 17:4313
    
    >>The best defensive backfield performer in the Steelers/Broncos game
    >>will wear a Steelers uniform - Cornerback Rod Woodson.  And you cain
      ^^^^^^^^^
    
    Uh, Er, HEY JD!!!!!
    
    Wore, that should be "wore".
    
    Da game was played a week and a half ago.
    
    JaKe
    
36.439COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Thu Nov 14 1991 19:4412
      I was just refering to safeties.   Yes Woodson is very good,  but he
    ain't no saftey.
    
      From what I have seen/heard,  Philly has the most players that hit
    late or are refered to as cheap shots.
    
      I watched that Vike/Bear game the other night,  and both Browner and
    Felix Wright were constantly in late.  Browner got caught 1 time,  but
    I don't remember Wright getting flagged,  and he should have.
    
    
    	Tim
36.440yeah right Jack, the man's got a halo and wingsCNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorFri Nov 15 1991 11:569
 I didn't mean to say Atwater was the only cheapshot artist in the league
 just one of them that's all. Atwater is a vary good safety agains the run
 but I've seen him get burnt a few times in pass defense. Most do from time
 to time. Woodson is indeed a safety and better than either of the Donko pair.
 
 BG your aggressivness is my cheapshot obviously...

 mike
36.441Childs.... Go to school ;^)QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 15 1991 17:4914
    
     Childs:   What ???  Are you on the same planet.....  
    what is "BG your aggressivness is my cheepshot obviously" supposed
    to mean...  I've gotten out of the habit of reading Giberish since
    DiNzMoRe laid off noting....
    
     Atwater and Woodson are both good safeties.....  Woodson has been 
    in and out of trouble all year.  It remains to be seen weather or not
    he can keep it together and remain on top.  On the other hand.... 
    Atwater is an all american boy who keeps his nose clean and plays
    hardnosed football....  He is not cheepshot or even one of the 
    cheepshots in the league.....
    
    Big Game
36.442CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorMon Nov 18 1991 13:1314
 Well I see the Denver Refs have now become a road crew. Elway was over the
 line and the sham with the clock was a disgrace but hey hey atleast you guys
 were kind enough to ship your refs to us in the meadowlands where they bailed
 out the Jints....

 and I still say Atwater is cheap...

 FWIW though I did bet denver $$$$$$  ;^) and turned my local saloon owner
 onto that as a better pick than the Jets. who shouldn't have escape NE alive.

 ;^)

 mike
36.443reply = jokeFRETZ::HEISERHey you're pretty good... NOT!Mon Nov 18 1991 13:593
    Yeah Elway received a gift.  He was at least 2 yards past the marker.
    
    Mike
36.444GENRAL::WADEGimme the beat boysMon Nov 18 1991 14:127
    
    	No doubt about it.  Elway was past the line.  Are the refs
    	trying to make a statement?  I saw similar things in the
    	Giants-Cowboys and Browns-Oilers games (plays that should
    	have been reversed but weren't).
    
    	Claybone
36.445Good game, as always!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Nov 18 1991 14:1739
       Denver has a great defense,  but lack in coaching when it comes to
    pressure.  Why in the ____ did they go to prevent at the end of the 1st
    half and the end of the game?   They let KC march down the field almost
    3x (3rd time game ended) and gets 10 points????????    They should have
    stuck with blitzing and better zone!!!  GET A CLUE REEVES AND
    PHILLIPS!!!
    
      I couldn't believe Wymon.   He was actually in the middle of 2 ints. 
    He got the 1st and then defended a play which in turn had Brooks catch
    the bounce of Wymons hands.  Wymon also kinda saved the game when he
    tackled the reciever in bounds on what ended up being the last play of
    the game!   I'm in shock!!!
    
      The offensive line is still a problem on pass blocking.  Yes KC has
    one of the best pass pressure D's,  but Elway was sacked 6x.   That was
    almost critcal since 1 sack took them out of FG range and then the
    center ended up muffing the snap for the punt and thus giving KC position
    in Denver territory on KC's last TD.
    
    Elway is Gawd!  Most every team would love to have him!
    
    
      And I never saw Atwater on any cheap or late hits!   Actually I think
    Atwater hasn't been as present as in the 1st 5 games.  Yes he had an
    INT yesterday,  but DeBerg overthru his reciever by 5yrds.  The only
    thing that could be causing this is maybe the DL is doing better and
    Atwater and Smith for that matter do not have to come up and be the
    ones stopping the running plays like they used to.
    
       Denver just needs to win in Seattle and its cruise mode from there.
    It will be tough.  I thought they would lose to KC and proved me wrong, 
    and maybe they can win in the girly-mon dome,  but unlikely.....
    
       The KC fans at the stadium throwing bear and all sorts of stuff on
    the Broncos as they left with the win suprised me and also showed no
    class on thier behalf!!!!!!!!
    
    
    	Tim
36.446We'll take it; Thanks for nothing, SeachickensBSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 18 1991 14:4352
> Well I see the Denver Refs have now become a road crew. Elway was over the
> line and the sham with the clock was a disgrace but hey hey atleast you guys
> were kind enough to ship your refs to us in the meadowlands where they bailed
> out the Jints....

    Yes, Elway was over the line, but only if that marker we were looking
    was the official line of scrimmage and not just a visual aid.  That may
    have been a factor in the review.  From what I've heard, if any part of
    a player's body is over the line, he is considered over the line of
    scrimmage (i.e., not where the ball leaves his hand or where his feet
    are).  But like I said, if that was officially the line of scrimmage,
    he was over.  But bottom line is:  Broncos win!  (HAHAHAHA)
    
>       The offensive line is still a problem on pass blocking.  Yes KC has
>    one of the best pass pressure D's,  but Elway was sacked 6x.   That was
>    almost critcal since 1 sack took them out of FG range and then the
>    center ended up muffing the snap for the punt and thus giving KC position
>    in Denver territory on KC's last TD.
    
    And on a couple of Elway's sacks he was still beckpeddaling when he was
    sacked.  That's bad.  But on the other hand, their run-blocking is very
    good this year.  That sack that took them out of field goal range
    really ticked me off.  The only worse that could've happened in that
    situation is a turnover.  They should've just run the ball there or
    have Elway roll out and have a run/throw option.  And when Horan fell
    on the bad snap I though that was the beginning of the end.
    
>        Denver just needs to win in Seattle and its cruise mode from there.
>    It will be tough.  I thought they would lose to KC and proved me wrong, 
>    and maybe they can win in the girly-mon dome,  but unlikely.....
    
    I also thought Denver would lose at KC but I'm glad I was wrong!  A win
    at Seattle next would just about wrap up the divison, but a loss
    won't be all that devastating.  I expect Seattle to win next week.
    As for defense, I agree again.  More blitzing, especially from Croel. 
    I can't believe they made Vlasic look like Montana on his first drive
    in the game by giving him all that time to throw.  You get a new QB in
    the game, you harass him - I thought that was common sense.
    
>       The KC fans at the stadium throwing bear and all sorts of stuff on
>    the Broncos as they left with the win suprised me and also showed no
>    class on thier behalf!!!!!!!!
    
    Yea, they were pretty bad, but the Broncos were just lovin' it.  I
    thought that was funny.  Many of them were giving the fans the chop.  
    But I though the only classless fans in the country were in Boulder???
    :^) :^)
 
    
    Joe
    
36.447AXIS::ROBICHAUDN.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptusMon Nov 18 1991 15:028
36.448CAM::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Mon Nov 18 1991 15:363
/Don,

Perhaps they were blowup bears....
36.449Donks about to wrap up AFC west !!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 18 1991 17:0825
    
     No question Elway was over the line....  I don't care if it was a
    visual aid on the sideline...  I saw where they snapped the ball 
    from and it was outside the 29....  Johnny was well beyond that before
    he started his wind up.  I like the way he answered the question posed
    after the game...  He says something like Well,  I thought I was behind
    the line or I wouldn't have thrown the ball...  You could see him just
    wanting to bust out laughing...  He knows he got away with one. all
    and all I think the Donks played a good game.....  Running the ball
    well, coming up with big plays when they need to and not putting the
    ball on the carpet.  The thing the Donks need to carry them into the
    playoffs with a chance at winning anything is get the offense in gear.
    The D is playing well....  The O on the other hand is only scoring
    when they have to.  We need to learn to ice a game ala the Bills and 
    Skins..
    
    
    Go Donks....
    
    Donks 	21
    
    Seachickens 17
    
    
    Big Game
36.450COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Nov 18 1991 17:3223
       I thought youze guys knew I cain't spel.....Actually,  I have this
    shirt that is Bear Beer.  It has this bear standing towards a snow
    drift showing that he just rents the suds.  Bought it over in Manitou
    Springs.  I would wear it to work,  but it might offend prospective
    customers that are always touring thru the plant;^
    
      Yes Elway was over the line!   On KC's last possesion,  the KC guy
    was tackled in bounds on one of the last plays,  but yet the ref signals
    out-o-bounds and stops the clock.  I think thats why the refs had the
    10 second run off on the play after,  since I didn't see a KC player hurt
    like in the spots/soilers game.
    
      When KC got thier last touchdown,  it was obvious and right in front
    of the ref that the KC reciever pushed off the denver DB in order to
    get open and catch the TD.
    
    I must say,  the officiating sucked in all 3 games I watched yesterday!!
    
    I couldn't watch all of the night game,  9 hours of football is a bit
    much,  plus the wife was tired of it......Can't always win;^)
    
    		
                Tim
36.451BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 18 1991 17:4120
    Alot of bad calls yesterday.  Despite what Childs says, that 10 seconds
    wasn't bogus.  Not to mention the one Tim just talked about (I think it
    was the previous play) where the receiver was clearly down in bounds
    right in front of the Denver bench.  Didn't catch that pushoff by the
    KC receiver on the TD though.  
    
    That Dallas game was really bad in the first half.  The Giants' drive
    where they scored a TD and eventually went up 13-3 was a joke.  First
    there was that mystery pass interference call, then the holding call
    down at the goal line which would've been 4th down.  Madden couldn't
    get over that one either.
    
    And how about that interception by Cleveland with only a couple minutes
    left in last night's game.  Took them a long time to make a call, and
    then they called him out of bounds.  Did they end up reversing that one
    and giving him an interception?  I flipped back to a movie before they
    decided.
    
    
    Joe
36.452Really need to do something about this crapQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 18 1991 21:0714
     I say lynch them "Damn Zebras".....   Hasn't been a good game
    called in weeks.....  Seriously,  I don't remember a recent season
    with so many bad calls/non-calls by the friggen Zebras.......
    These guys should be on the pay for performance plan like we're
    supposed to be here at DEC....  A bad call costs you some $$$
    when nexted(tm) years salary planning goes on....  Oh yea,  I
    forgot they're in ther Damn union !!!  No wonder their calls
    stink,  they don't have to worry about losing their jobs !
    
    Big Game
    
    DONKS RULE !!!
    
    
36.453DECWET::METZGEREveryday is like Sunday.Mon Nov 18 1991 22:4722
These guys are part time employees with "better" full time jobs. I know John
Hendry has waxed poetic on why the NFL doesn't have full time referees but
if the recent trend continues I see no alternative then to get full time 
employees....If the WFL continues these guys could do WFL games in the spring
and summer and then do NFL games in the fall/ winter. Mebbe that would be
enough work for a full time officiating crew....

Right now they stink and are getting worse...I've always been an instant replay
advocate but it's losing me this year with the inept way they're using it. Too 
many times I've seen calls reviewed on meaningless plays (and wait, wait, wait 
for the guy) and other times seen crucial calls not get a glance.....

I still think that they could make better use of it if it was an appeal by the
coach instead of a guy in a booth. If the coach looses the reversal they lose
a timeout, if they have no more timeouts they lose 15 yards or so....

Make it strategy instead of insipidness....

Although I watched very little football yesterday...

Metz
36.454FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Nov 19 1991 10:3831
    Just remember one thing - with the "better" full-time jobs a lot of
    these guys have, the NFL would either have to pay them a hell of a lot
    more to keep many of them, or risk losing them and have worse
    officials.  Bad as many of you may think they are, they are the best
    football officials there are and if the NFL has to bring in a crop of
    new guys, things will be worse for a while.  That's a more scary
    thought for me than what we have now.
    
    Even with working WLAF games in the spring, at the current pay scale,
    they'd lose a lot of guys.  There are half as many WLAF games every
    week so they'd only need half as many officials to work the WLAF games
    anyway.  Some NFL officials did work the WLAF games - it was mostly the
    newer guys although Stan Kemp, Bernie Kukar and Larry Nemmers - veteran
    officials who got promoted to referee this year - were referees in the
    WLAF.  I'll also still maintain that with the amount of work these guys
    put in during the off-season and between games, there really isn't that
    much more work they can do during the season than what they are doing
    now.  I also believe they will get stale with doing absolutely nothing
    but film work and rules study without games to work more than once a
    week.  None of this is a "paid political announcement" by the NFL
    either. 
    
    Part of the problem is the changeover from Art McNally to Jerry Seeman
    as Director of Officiating.  With any new boss, there are going to be
    changes in doing things and some of the guys who've been around for a
    long time probably aren't feeling quite as secure as they used to.  I
    think that's being reflected in the officiating.
    
    I also agree with dumping Replay.
    
    John
36.455Last night was another example of Zebras stinking up the placeQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 19 1991 12:3810
    
     I like replay....  I think it adds to the game when used correctly.
    I think Metz hit it on the head.....  Make it a strategy thing.  I
    see no reason to let a bad call go by the way side when we have the
    means to reverse it when need be.  Dumping replay does exactly that.
    Keep replay...  but make some needed adjustments.  Metz's ideas seem
    like a good place to start as far as I'm concerned !
    
    Big Game
    
36.456GENRAL::WADEGimme the beat boysTue Nov 19 1991 13:5411
    
    	I don't know Metz.  I saw at least 3 calls that should have
    	been overturned by replay.  They weren't.  And you want to
    	assess them a timeout or something?  No way.
    
    	I don't think giving them "X" number of replay reviews per
    	half would work.  You can't say the refs will blow ONLY
    	that many (especially when the Clemson refs are working
    	the Donk games right Mike Childs!).
    
    	Claybone
36.457Ramblings of a Donk fanNEXUS::SALZERTue Nov 19 1991 17:0713
    OK. The cover is blown. Denver is in 1st and everybody sees them now.
    If I was a Bronco, I'd of gotten up yesterday morning and kicked
    myself once again for loosing 2 weeks ago in a coulda-shoulda-woulda.
    
    I knew the pass play would be the center of argument but that's not
    what blew the game for KC. Pulling DeBerg and having Mark Vlassic 
    attempt to lead you in a winning drive iced it for Denver.
    
    So now it's Seattle and that doesn't look too bad but who knows?
    Does anyone know why Clarence Kay remains on this team?
    24 points sunday was the most scored on KC this season.
    
    BoB 
36.458Mis December of SI...oh yeh!COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Nov 19 1991 18:0711
         I like replay if its used correctly,  but now that there seems to
    be so many problems,  then maybe they should throw it out!  I thought
    the replay guys have 2 minutes to review it or the play stands.  If
    this is true,  when will it be enforced?
    
      I'm not sure of the playoff scenarios yet since there are 5 games
    left.  I do think that at least 2 AFC west teams will meet in the
    playoffs,  but who?  If Denver is in it,  then I hope its in Denver.  I
    wouldn't mind going to another game this year.
    
    	Tim
36.459DECWET::METZGEREveryday is like Sunday.Tue Nov 19 1991 19:5010
Another thing you gotta do is get rid of the replay  official who's an ex-nfl
official. Hire some dude who's got two eyes and an attitude that he doesn't
care if he pisses off the old farts on the field by overruling their calls.

:-)

only 1/2 kidding,

Metz
36.460another good point by Metz !!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerWed Nov 20 1991 13:481
    
36.461GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishThu Nov 21 1991 17:5412
    
    	Elway's shoulder is hurting.  He's questionable for Sunday.
    	He took a cortisone shot Monday and didn't throw yesterday.
    	What slim hopes of a Super Bowl Denver has will vanish if
    	he isn't 100%.
    
    	Bobby Humphrey decided to skip practice/meetings yesterday.
    	He's got a *personal* problem which added with his severe
    	lack of PT has him unhappy.  Reeves is giving him some time
    	off to mull over his future.
    
    	Clayboone
36.462COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Nov 22 1991 13:0316
      Humphrey is back at practice.  He will sit out this weekend.  This
    boy better figure out what he is doing, or his future could be in
    question.
    
      Elway will start sunday.  Look for Shawn Moore to be activated just
    in case.  I wouldn't mind seeing him play instead of Kubiak, if Elway
    goes out for whatever reason.
    
      The denver defensive line will have to control this game in order for
    the Broncos to win IMO.  If Krieg isn't pressured,  then he will pick
    apart the def backs.  He has always had a good success against Denver.
    
    
        Denver by 2.......Point spread is 3, I thin Bobbalou
    
    	Tim
36.463Bet The Farm...... I did !QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 22 1991 13:276
    
    NEWFLASH!!!!!!!
    
    Donks CRUSH Seachickens.....  WIN 2nd game in Dome this year...
    
    BIG GAME
36.464Three way tie...come Monday!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Nov 22 1991 16:328
    Elway and Humphrey are both a couple of crybaby-mama's boys, send 
    Humphrey over to the Raiders so that they can make a man outta him! 
    And send Elway out to pasture.....he's washed up.
    
    Look for Krieg to set new records this weekend, and give Elway a
    quarterbacking lesson.....
    
    Carlitos  :-)
36.465Get off the Whisky !! ;^)QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 22 1991 16:5416
    Carlitos....
    
     What are you on dude ????  ELway a cry baby...  The man hasn't
    missed a start since 88 or 89.  He's one tough hombre...  I mean
    who else (QB's) runs the ball into the endzone like a RB, sholder 
    down and everything.  As far as being washed up goes You had better
    open you eyes and look a bit closer to home.  Anyone who has Wrong
    Way Jay for a QB should be real careful about critizing other team
    QB's.  The day Dave "It's been years since we've had a winning record"
    Kreig gives Elway a QB lesson will be the day Wrong Way Jay gets the
    Faiders past the first round of the playoffs.  Look for the Donk 
    Defense to dominate this game and Elway & Co. to have their finest
    offensive outing this year aganist the mighty Seachickens
    
    
    Big Game
36.466ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Nov 22 1991 17:256
    Yeah...but...Wrong Way did get them past the first round just last year 
    against the mighty Bengals. And another thing, wasn't biff originally
    called Wrong Way Elway..(amongst other fine nicknames like Mr. Ed.)
    .....how did Schroeder inherit this?
    
    Curly-Toes!
36.467QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 22 1991 17:308
    
     I knew that would be misunderstood....  I mean
    they've never had a win past the first round with 
    wrong way.
    
    Big Game
    
    p.s.  If the Shoe fits  (ie: wrong way)
36.468COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Fri Nov 22 1991 17:3713
      I don't recall Elway having the "wrong way" nickname.  He has been
    called Mr. Ed,  Biff, canon arm and of course Gawd......
    
      I see that its getting close to the end of the season,  and the faids
    might get into the playoffs,  so now Carlos wants to rile everyone up, 
    and it just might work.
    
      Maybe it has something to do with the "what others think of sports
    topic" where someone said that the faids/donks bashing just hasn't been
    the same since hootsie and parrot left.  Carlos tries,  but he seems to
    be the only faider faithful left.
    
    	Tim
36.469QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 22 1991 18:3810
    
     Carlos has put forth a valiant effort but falls far short of
    filling the shoes of the Great Uncle Hootsie...  That guy and his
    parrot were so one sided and caught up in the faider BS that they
    couldn't see the forest for the trees...  With a little practice
    Carlos may reach the afore mentioned status but it will take 
    great effort and commitment.  Good luck on your journey to becoming
    a legend in your own mind, Carlos....
    
    Big Game
36.470GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishFri Nov 22 1991 18:598
    
    	I'll never forget Hoot asking: "Is Officer Perry going to
    	play?"  I was giggling all day.  The Parrot was overrated
    	IMO.  He just rode on Hoot's coattails hence the nickname.
    
    	Claybone
    
    	ps  Carlos does a fine job representing the Raider scum! :^)
36.471ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Fri Nov 22 1991 19:0610
    Thanks guys....I think....
    
    I missed most of the Hoot & Parrot show. I was just coming in when they 
    were going out, too bad, I coulda learned alot from those guys (on how 
    to rile you Donks I mean) and it sure would be nice to have an ally or
    two, ....in all fairness 'though Mr. Childs knows how to get under your
    skins, and he cracks me up every once in a while, thanks Mikey, and
    keep up the good work.
    
    Carlitos
36.472BSS::JCOTANCHFri Nov 22 1991 19:2010
>    but he seems to
>    be the only faider faithful left.
   
    See, they are getting this conference cleaned up.  
    
    :^) :^)
    
    
    Joe 
 
36.473QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 22 1991 19:451
    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH    Raider SCUM !!!!
36.474CSC32::J_HERNANDEZYou say you don't want it...Fri Nov 22 1991 19:542
    The Parrott was way overrated. I remember one night at the Dub where he
    was acting like such a jerk that even Hoot was annoyed.
36.475Seachickens 13, Denver 10BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 25 1991 13:0914
The defense is getting better and the offense is getting worse.  Elway had 
hardly any time to throw yesterday and was sacked 5 times as the offense
scored a whopping 3 points.  They had a first and goal at the 6 but had to 
settle for a field goal.  They had 2 late drives into Seattle territory but
couldn't convert on 4th down.  And now Mark Jackson, the 2nd best receiver on 
the team, could be out for the rest of the season.  Last week in KC the
offense got 3 turnovers to work with but only managed 17 points.  

Despite a pitiful first half, Denver had numerous chances to win a game I 
expected them to lose.  Now they probably can't lose more than 1 game the
rest of the season if they are to win the division.  


Joe 
36.476caugh, gag, or anything else you can call itCOMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Mon Nov 25 1991 13:3621
      I thought both defenses played ok,  but the teams seemed to be
    "disoriented".  Elway should have been yanked.  He had 2 ints and 2
    fumbles in the 1st half!!   He was obviously in pain and had a hard
    time throwing the ball.   Kubiak couldn't of hurt the team anymore than
    Biff.
    
      Mark Jackson had the game winner go through his hands and off his
    gut.  I'm not sure if he would of held onto the ball after that monster
    hit!
    
      Denver had a prime chance yesterday to be tied with Houston for 2nd
    best record in AFC,  but they choked.  Actually all the division
    leaders choked yesterday,  and now the FAids have the AFC west lead
    since they owned Denver in tie breakers.  Denver has lost 3 divison
    games.
    
      I don't see Denver getting past the 1st or 2nd round of playoffs with
    the offense lacking as they are!!!!
    
    
    		Tim
36.477CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalMon Nov 25 1991 13:558
    
>      Mark Jackson had the game winner go through his hands and off his
>    gut.  I'm not sure if he would of held onto the ball after that monster
>    hit!
    
 my favorite highlight from the game....

 ;^)
36.478Donks in a battle for their playoff life for the rest of the seasonQUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 25 1991 14:3419
    
     The donks just couldn't pull of the magic yesterday.  I have never
    seen the blow so many chances to win a game late in the 4th like they
    did.  Elways was hurting but that is not what cost them the game.  
    Their running game has been what made them successful all season and 
    it was not there yesterday.  The Donks needed that win and couldn't
    pull it out.  Look for a real battle for the title in the west this
    year.  with 3 left the donks need some help from the Faids to be
    assured another title.  All around another tipical AFC West battle
    in the King Dome...
    
    
    Go Donks
    
    Big Game
    
    
    P.S.  Thanks a bunch to the Clowns for beating K.C.  Although the way
    K.C. played they could have beaten themselves W/O much help.
36.479OUCH!FRETZ::HEISERdonderfliegen!Mon Nov 25 1991 14:553
    Re: Robinson's hit on Jackson
    
    We felt the tremors down here!
36.480Elway was a cause!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Mon Nov 25 1991 15:437
      If Jackson is out,  then what for?  Cracked ribs or sumthin like
    that?
    
      Mike,  do you like seeing people get hurt?  I didn't even think you
    were that bad.
    
    	Tj
36.481Thigh-shuddering pleasure ! :-) (tm)LUNER::BROOKSToo legit ! Too legit to quit !Mon Nov 25 1991 15:491
    Great hit n the endzone on Mark Jackson !
36.482BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 25 1991 15:514
    Jackson suffered a dislocated right wrist.
    
    
    Joe
36.483A little light in the loafers?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Nov 25 1991 16:154
    So he's basically gonna be walking around with a limp wrist like the
    rest of the team huh? 
    
    
36.484Donks need to take a long hard look !QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 25 1991 17:2335
    
     Here we go !!!
    
     Jackson was not injured from the hit.  The heat the Elway put on the
    ball is what caused his injury.  The ball was slightly deflected by
    the defender and hit Jackson in the wrist causing it to bend backwards
    and become slightly dislocated.  He will play nexted(tm) week, count on
    it.  I've always liked Jacksom because he is the toughest receiver the
    Donks have.  Still,  I beleive the ball should have been caught.  It
    was only slightly knocked off track by the deflection. 
    
     The issue I have is that this game should have never come down to 
    Jackson making this catch.  The offense was totaly worthless yesterday.
    with the field position that the Donks had through out most of the
    first half they should have routed the Seachickens.  
    
     I beleive that another reason the Donks lost is because they didn't
    make the correct adjustments at half time to counter act the pass
    rush from Seattle.  They should have begun to set up the run with more
    1st down passes...  Just some real short (3 to 5 yrds) shots to the 
    backs and T.E.'s would have done the trick.  This would have opened
    up the running game by spreading the defense.  Reeves it very bad at
    making adjustments to his game plan when required in the middle of a
    game.  He also has the motivational talent of a hangman.
    
     In short,  we can blame this Donk loss on the total lack of offense
    which was caused by an injured Elway and some poor play calling.  Like
    I said earlier,  with the field position the Donks had in the 1st half,
    this should'nt have even been close.
    
     The Donks better pull their respective you no whats out of the dirt
    nexted(tm) week against the Pats or the same thing will happen in 
    Mile High that happend in the Kingdome this week.
    
    Big Game
36.485CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalMon Nov 25 1991 18:586
 Of course I don't like to see people hurt Tim but I do love to see Donk
 receivers drop GAME WINNING TOUCHDOWNS....he dropped the ball before he
 was hit in case you missed it.....

 mike
36.486I agree with much of what you said, BGBSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 25 1991 19:0942
>    I've always liked Jacksom because he is the toughest receiver the
>    Donks have.  Still,  I beleive the ball should have been caught.  It
>    was only slightly knocked off track by the deflection. 
    
    Jackson is definitely tougher than Vance or Nattiel, but I would say
    Young is their toughest receiver and also their most dependable go-to
    guy.  As for the ball being caught, it may have hit him right in the
    stomach but when someone waves a hand in your face at the last minute
    that makes it a very difficult catch, even if he didn't tip it.
    
>     The issue I have is that this game should have never come down to 
>    Jackson making this catch.  The offense was totaly worthless yesterday.
>    with the field position that the Donks had through out most of the
>    first half they should have routed the Seachickens.  
    
    Yea, that's the tough part.  The defense is not only playing well enough to
    win, but they're playing well enough to where Denver would be beating
    people by 3 TD's every week with any type of decent offensive
    production.  Hell, outside of the Houston disaster (which was credited
    mostly to field position, turnovers, and special teams blunders) the
    most poinst Denver is 20 against KC last week.
    
>     I beleive that another reason the Donks lost is because they didn't
>    make the correct adjustments at half time to counter act the pass
>    rush from Seattle.  

    As much as Denver has been blitzed in recent weeks, you would think
    they could either come up with (1)some way to slow down the pass rush 
    or (2) some way to burn the blitz.  Hint: the screen pass.  Oops, I
    forgot.  A successful screen pass doesn't exist in Denver's playbook.
    
>    They should have begun to set up the run with more
>    1st down passes...  Just some real short (3 to 5 yrds) shots to the 
>    backs and T.E.'s would have done the trick.  
    
    This is the way I've felt for the past couple of seasons.  That is so
    much of what the Niners use - a 2 or 3-step drop by the QB, and he
    knows exactly where he's going to throw the ball before the snap. 
    Those passes are almost impossible to defend.
    
    
    Joe
36.487QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 25 1991 20:1721
    
     Joe,
    
     You're right about Young....  I guess I was caught up in the 
    old Three Amigo crap.  Young is tougher than Jackson and makes
    the big play when needed.  Young reminds me alot of Steve Watson.
    Tough, Slow and wide open.
    
     I watched the replay 3 or 4 times and swear that the ball caused 
    the injury to Jackson.  It looked as though the ball bounced off of
    his hand bending it backwards and then hit him in the gut. The "HIT"
    seemed to put Jackson down on his back/side not on the wrist,  I won't
    swear to this in court though.  I am sure that the local rag will have
    all the details today...
    
     I don't understand the lack of the S.F. style short passing game in
    Denver especially with the blitz being a big factor in their offensive
    woes.  The Niners useed that style very successfully and I think the 
    Donks could do the same.
    
    Big Game
36.488CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalMon Nov 25 1991 22:0913
    
>     I don't understand the lack of the S.F. style short passing game in
>    Denver especially with the blitz being a big factor in their offensive
>    woes.  The Niners useed that style very successfully and I think the 
>    Donks could do the same.
    
 It's simple Big Game just look at the respective personel and coaches...
 Rice and Taylor are big receivers who can catch the ball on the quick
 slants in traffic because they are big enough to muscle out of the pops
 off the line etc...it also helps that Joe has a bit more touch than Biff...

 mike

36.489Keep that train a rollin'CTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSTue Nov 26 1991 11:248
    Ya hoid it hear first:
    Pats  17
    Donks 14
    
    Fryar too tough to handle. Revenge will be sweet
    
    MikeL
    
36.490GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishTue Nov 26 1991 12:329
    
    	Well, this'll be a first, but I agree with ya Mikey C.  BBJ
    	would drill holes in his receivers in a short passing game.
    
    	Elway's shoulder isn't getting any better.  The only
    	prescription for the tendonitis is rest.  Look for him to
    	take a day off soon (ie a game).  He also has a bone spur.
    
    	Claybone
36.491Donks in Must Win Game This Sunday At Mile High !QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 26 1991 13:2126
    
      Things are looking tough for the Donks down the road.  Elway
    is beat up and like Clay said he ain't getting any better.  The have
    to play the Pats who are coming off of a big win and always play the
    Donks tough.  Mark Jackson could be out for nexted(tm) weeks game
    and if he does play he'll surely not be 100%.  The offense is struggling 
    badly and shows no sign of recovery (kinda like the economy).  This is 
    the time for a real gut check for Mr.Ed and the Donks.  Look for a 
    close one in Mile High this weekend.
    
    Donks 21
    
    Pats  17
    
     The short passing game is a must for Denver if they are to get the 
    offense rolling again.  Elway has shown in the past (Yea thats right
    Mikey...) that he can play this kind of football.  After all,  that
    was their bread and butter when their running game was non-existent.
    I don't beleive they have to entirely depend on the S.F. style offense,
    only use it to break open the running game.  Mr.Ed is at his best when 
    the Donks can run the ball.  He gains complete control of the field,
    the defnese can not possibly cover all of the options he presents 
    when the running game is on.
    
    
    Big Game
36.492COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Tue Nov 26 1991 14:3428
       Young is toughest reciever.  With Jackson going down,  this means
    the vance will get more playing time,  and thats good.  Like his
    attitude or not,  vance can catch the ball,  and isn't affraid to go
    over the middle,  he's just chicken on punt returns!
    
    
      The play calling is REeves' fault.  He is calling most of the plays
    again,  and when its 1st down,  and you run up the middle,  well
    eventually that gets REAL predictable!!!!   I agree with the 3-5 yard
    dump offs,  and with Reeves being a DAllas boy,  you think he would use
    alot of that,  like maybe to Perryman or Greene.
    
    
       Look for the Pats to be fired up this week,  after all they did bump
    off the AFC leader last week,  and would love to do it again to a
    division leader.  Heck Dick probably has his guys thinking they still
    have playoff possibilities;^)
    
    
       Denvers defense will have to get the turnovers for the offense so
    the offense can score the usual 16 points.
    
       Denver   16
    
       Pats     10
    
    
    	Tim
36.493happy T Day Boy & Girls !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Nov 26 1991 14:565
    Well,  This is my last day till Monday....  Just wanted to 
    have a great thanksgiving everyone...  I know I will,  I'll be skiing
    all weekend in Crested Butte....
    
    Big Game
36.494FDCV07::KINGBe nice to me, I'm a Pheresis Donor!!Tue Nov 26 1991 15:006
    Hey Big game is goin' BUTTE SKIING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    REK
    
    In the rockies, where men are men and women are men.. And it's kinda
    hard to tell them apart with all that ski stuff on.. :-}
36.495FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Nov 26 1991 15:103
    I thought the Rockies were where men are men and sheep are scared.
    
    John
36.496Ski Resorts :== Many, Many Women and some are even pretty !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Nov 26 1991 15:148
    
     Not true REK...  Lots of fine "Ski Bunnies"  out on them there
    ski slopes.....
    
    Ninj,  You got the Rockies confused with Wyoming...
    the line goes "Wyoming,  where men are men and sheep azre scared"
    
    Big Game
36.497DECWET::METZGEREveryday is like Sunday.Tue Nov 26 1991 15:1812
Have a good time in Crested Butte, Big Game. We just had our major areas out here
open up in time for the thanksgiving ski holiday. Unfortunately I'll be going
back east for Bird-day but I'll get my skiing in over the rest of the year.

Anybody ever been to Tahoe? Bruce on Sissy Sports? My little brother just 
moved there to become a ski bum for the season and I'd like to visit him this
spring for some turns. When would be a good time to go?


Metz
 
36.498Raiders #1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Tue Nov 26 1991 15:2410
    >>Look for the Pats to be fired up this week, after all they did bump
    >>off the AFC leader last week, and would love to do it again to a
    divisi>>on leader.
    
    Yeah.....but...everybody knows that the Raiders are the division leader
    Tim, where you been? :-)
    
    Carlos   PS You didn't really think I was gonna let you get away with
                that did you?
     
36.499Watch out for them Texan women!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Tue Nov 26 1991 15:2925
      re-1  I was hoping you didn't catch that.
    
    
      Jack,  Is it still free at Crusted Butt?  They had a deal down there
    where tickets are free so all you pay for is lodging.  I wanted to go, 
    but I'm still lacking the lodging & partying funds...booo
    
      Its suppose to snow on T-day.....Have fun!!  And.......
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
       Break a leg;^)     Couldn't resist.....
    
    	Tim
36.500CSC32::P_PAPACEKTue Nov 26 1991 16:145
    
    I think the free lift tickets are till the 14th/15th.  But don't quote me
    on it.  
    
    Pat
36.501Eastern skier>Western skier 8^)CTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSTue Nov 26 1991 16:2213
    Tim, -1
    Watch out fer them Texan wimmin is right. Last year I took a trip
    to Breck,Copper, etc. and at the airport(Denver) saw a bevy of Western
    bedecked goddesses wif deep drawls. Come to find out they was a
    goin' to Vail to meet their husbands who all were in the oil bidness.
    A thief coulda retired with their jewelry (dadgum Texan rich felines).
    And of course they had great fun wif ma Boston accent ( don't y'all
    ski little hills in Bahston). Felt like doin the Texas Two-Step raght
    in der faces!
    
    MikeL
    Whose gonna try ta ski at Sunday River or Killington this weekend
    
36.502Should be fun.... Could be alittle crowded though !hQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Nov 26 1991 16:3616
    
     Carlos...  You pretty quick big guy...  Can't slip nothin past 
    you can we ??    ;^)
    
     Tim,  The Skiing is free until the 15 of December.  Crusty Butt 
    has about a 34 inch base last I heard with more on the way come
    Thursday.  Just for future reference,  We got a condo for 3 for
    $80.00 a night,  not a bad deal...  The place has the standards,
    fire place, nice kitchen, hot tub, heated pool and a Rec area
    with pool tables and a bar.  I you're looking to go let me know and 
    I'll  give you the name and number to get in touch with those 
    Yah Hoos in Crested Butte.  
    
     Big Game  (Who Can't wait to bust out his new K2 KVC Kevlar Skis
                but not on this trip... not enough snow)
    
36.503COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Tue Nov 26 1991 19:135
      re-2    Instead of the 2 step,  maybe you should of told them to show
    you the Texas couch dance;^)  I haven't seen it,  but I was told its
    rather um interesting.......
    
    	Tim
36.504don't need extra help gittin' in troubleCTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSWed Nov 27 1991 10:495
    Texas couch dance?  I woulda gotten slapped upside the haid by these
    wahoos as well as my wife who was a standin' right next to me.
    
    MikeL
    
36.505Ouch!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Wed Nov 27 1991 15:045
      Oh,  I didn't know you had the little lady with ya.....But ya never
    know about the other gals,  they may have said somethin like,  sure
    where is there a couch and closed door;^)....
    
      Tim
36.506Go Pats!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Wed Nov 27 1991 17:099
    Isn't an ex-donk assistant coach now coaching for the Pats? I seem to
    remember the announcers mentioning something about that during their
    first game earlier this season. He said something about this coach
    knowing Elways (and the rest of the teams) strenghths and weaknesses,
    and how best to attack them. Anyhow the first game was a close one that
    the Donks lucked out on, because of an in-experienced QB making a fatal
    mistake. I had a chance to go see it in person, but I'm glad I didn't.
    Look for more of the same this weekend. Will Biff be playing?
    
36.507FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Nov 27 1991 17:186
    Joe Collier, Stan Jones, Myrel Moore and Charlie West, who made up the
    bulk of the Denver Defensive coaching staff through the 1988 season,
    make up the bulk of the New England Defensive coaching staff this
    season.
    
    John
36.508Play Moore!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Wed Nov 27 1991 17:453
      I'm sure Elway will play.  Ole' Danny wouldn't want it any other way.
    
    	Tj
36.509tsk, tsk after THIS GAME, no comment....CSTEAM::FARLEYDSA = Drood(tm) Supporters AnonymousSun Dec 01 1991 23:241
    
36.510It should heat up in here this week !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 02 1991 13:1820
    
     Well the donks offense seems to be begining to round the bend
    and get back on track.  The defense is playing the best I've seen 
    in some time.  I realize that the Pats are far from the best team
    in the league but they did just hammer on Luckaolo lasted(tm)
    week.  Denver didi it part to stay in the hunt for the AFC west
    title.  It's just to bad the the Faiders lucked out and slipped by
    the Chargers.  Can't wait til nexted week.  The Donks are gonna crush
    the Clowns and the Faiders will be soundly trounced by the Bills.
    What more could a Donk fan ask for besides an SB win...  ;^)
    
    
    
    Big Game
    
    Donks    27
    
    `Spots   10
    
    
36.511Raiders Rule!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 02 1991 13:385
    Somebody please wake Big Shame up, he's dreaming again! Hey Big Game,
    Bernie's gonna be your new hero after this weekend. Him or Schroeder.
    :-)
    
    
36.512Donks = 1991/1992 AFC WEST CHAMPIONS !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 02 1991 13:4213
    
     In your dreams....  The Donks will stomp the Clowns into the dirt 
    and if Luckaolo does'nt beat the Happless Faiders by at least 10
    pts I'll take a trip to the Crow Cafe on their behalf.  Like I said in
    the Donks topic...  Look for the Donks to finish out the season 3-0
    and the Faiders to go 1-3.  Donks have the West all but in hand.
    And with an Eagle win tonight have a shot at first round home field
    advantage.
    
    Go Donks
    
    
    Big Game
36.513BSS::JCOTANCHMon Dec 02 1991 13:4221
    
    Elway didn't know if he was gonna play until Sunday morning but he sure
    looked sharp.  Russell's getting better every week.  Defense also looked
    good although Croel and Powers were out.  Denver had some opportunities
    for some more points but hurt themselves with turnovers or penalties. 
    Anyway, they looked pretty good and actually won easily and I got to
    relax in the 4th quarter for once.  Heck, I even turned over to the
    NO-SF game at the end - what a wild finish that was.  
    
>    Can't wait til nexted week.  The Donks are gonna crush
>    the Clowns and the Faiders will be soundly trounced by the Bills.
     
    I'm definitely excited to see Luckalo whip the Faids and put them in
    their place.  I don't care for the Bills but I'll certainly root for 
    'em against Iraq.  I don't know about the Denver-Cleveland game though.  
    I still think Denver will lose one of their 2 remaining road games and 
    this could be it.  Cleveland still has an outside shot at a wildcard too, 
    so that should give them more incentive.
    
    
    Joe
36.514QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 02 1991 13:431
    That should read Faiders topic....
36.515COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Tue Dec 03 1991 14:2020
       Denvers offense looked better 'cause Elway called most of the plays
    this game.  He called ALL of the plays in the 1st 2 series.  I liked
    seeing something other than run up the middle on 1st down.
    
      I don't think Denver will stomp the spots,  but they have a very good
    chance at winning.  I agree with Joe,  cleveland has some incentive and
    might be prepared.
    
      Denver will win as long as Kosar is presured.   Elway (if he plays)
    always finds a way to get the points that are needed,  against the
    spots anyway.
    
      Denvers defense is the best that I've seen in awhile! 
    I loved that CB blitz by Tyrone Braxton.   That is something that
    I haven't seen Denver do much of.  They usually send LBs. 
    Thats probably why the Pats offense didn't even look for him.  Keep it
    up Wade.
    
    
         Tim
36.516Really, The 8th is my B-day, Send money to cxo1-1/p22QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 03 1991 17:0711
    
    
    
     D O N K S    # 1    SLAM CLOWNS ON MY B-DAY  !!!  
    
    
    What a great present that will be !!
    
    
    Big Game (Who's 29th will be complete with a Donk POUNDING of the
             `Spots)
36.517I wish the pats were playing the donks next yearRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Dec 04 1991 10:137
    So the Mighty Donks Swept the Patriots... Big Deal, remeber that first
    win came on a very dump QB error.  I wont call it good luck by the
    donks, more like bad luck for the NE pats.  The Pats suc(# last year
    due to not have the right personal, whats the donks excuse.  The pats
    will be in the Playoff hunt next year and may even make it.  See you
    nexted time...
    								mab
36.518Marty was to BLAM! TALLIS::CIMNET::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Wed Dec 04 1991 11:5410
    
  >  Denver will win as long as Kosar is presured.   Elway (if he plays)
  >  always finds a way to get the points that are needed,  against the
  >  spots anyway.
    
    Elway always put up enough points against Marty..   But he hasn't managed 
    in the last 2 meetings, now, has he?  
    
    /Jeff
    
36.519Wake up and Smell the Coffee ;^)QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 04 1991 13:0523
    
     The first game the Donks lost this decade to the firggin Clowns
    was the Battery game where the entir face of the game was turned 
    by the totaly out of control fans in cleveland.  When a team is driving
    for a score and the fans are allowed to cause such disruption in 
    the game that the Zebras have to switch ends of the field you can
    hardly say the 11 men on the field stoped the drive...  Maybe the 
    12th man in the stands being a complete drunken jerk.
    
     The second game the Donks lost was last year, in mile high.  They
    just plain lost this game with a bit-o help from the zebras as well
    with a BS pass int call and some well timed holding calls as well.
    I would hardly say that domination and to say that the fact that 
    Marty left is the reason the Donks have lost the last 2 in just plain
    wishful thinking.  The have dominated the Clowns over their entire
    history of playing,  not just in the Marty era...  The DOMINATION
    WILL CONTINUE !!!
    
    
    Go Donks
    
    
    Big Game
36.520BSS::JCOTANCHWed Dec 04 1991 13:209
    FWIW, the "switch end-zones" game was in '89, which only makes the
    Browns 1-0 against Denver this decade.  Actually, the '89 AFC
    Championship game was played in January of 1990 so the series is
    actually even at 1-1 for the 90's.  Oh, wait a minute, Brown fans don't
    consider the AFC Championship game to be a big game, so I guess that
    one doesn't count.  
    
    
    Joe   
36.521Clowns by 11...CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalWed Dec 04 1991 14:0410
 Hey Jack, with all this talk about refs it occurs to me you'd make a great
 TarHeel fan....

 and all thisd huff and puff about Biff is just that. The bum has beaten
 one winning team this year and hasn't thrown for over 200 yards in his
 last 6 outings...and this supposed to be GAWD in a football uniform?
 hashahahaaaa

 mike 
36.522The usual garbage of the week!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Wed Dec 04 1991 15:1415
       Biff threw for over 200 yards against the pats last Sunday. 
    Also, I don't remember Marty losing to the Broncos in the 89-90 AFC
    champeenship game.  He was in KC already,  if my "great" memory serves
    me right.   Elway was not calling many plays the last 6 weeks,  thus
    the always predictable reeves was stopped.
    
    
      Mikey,  you darn well know you would love to have elway on the
    squeelers squad.   He is better than booby and o'ducko......
    
    
       Tim
    
    
       
36.523CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalWed Dec 04 1991 16:238
 no Tim, I seriously wouldn't. His Td to Inty ratio stinks bigtime. Sure
 he can run and sure he can throw the thing 80 yards in the air but he
 cannot read defense and has no touch whatsoever. I'd rahter have Hugh
 Millen.....

 He's a headcase, he's overpaid and he's a whinner...No thanks you keep
 him....
36.524QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 04 1991 17:197
    
     Childs...  If I thought you had a clue about what the Zebras 
    are supposed to do I might get offended by your tarheel remark.
    The Donks got ripped by the Zebras and the drunken `Spots fans
    last time in Clevescum.  It won't happen again !!
    
    Big Game
36.525Belichick 2x Marty, 4x Carson.CIMNET::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Wed Dec 04 1991 17:3210
    
    Gawd bless, big game is still bitchin' about a meaningless game played
    2 1/2 years ago..  
    
    What is Marty's lifetime record vs. the Donks as a head coach?  Does he
    even have a win against them?  
    
    I rest my case.  
    
    /Jeff
36.526BSS::JCOTANCHWed Dec 04 1991 17:403
    Marty's only win against Denver came last year in KC.
    
    Joe
36.527QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 04 1991 17:4410
     What,  I can't talk about one of the most outragous things to 
    happen durring a game of football...  You clowns fan are still
    raving about the victory !!  Give it a rest !!  
    
    Big Game
    
    The Donks will even Belichick's record come Sunday and end the Lowly
    Clowns season at the same time !
    
    
36.528CIMNET::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Thu Dec 05 1991 10:548
    
    Small_Brain, noone's raving about that victory, we're only using it to 
    offset your insistance that the Donks own the Browns..   When if fact
    the Browns have won 2 of the last 3.  Make it 3 of 4 after sunday.  
    
    Can't wait for you to eat some serious crow come Monday Morning.
    
    /Jeff
36.529QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 05 1991 13:338
    
     And what about you...  It will make my week to see you Bellie up to
    the Crow bar for a nice cold serving of the Black Bird.  The Clowns
    can't win this game...  they just don't have the talent to pullit off.
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game
36.530Even up says Vegas.CIMNET::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Thu Dec 05 1991 13:469
    
    
    Fine, fine.. but you will be hard pressed to find any outrageous
    predictions I've made regarding the game, Unlike your assertions that
    the Browns don't even belong in the same league as the "mighty" donks.  
    
    If I'm forced to visit the CC I'll be sampling, I won't be gorging.  
    
    /Jeff
36.531CSC32::SALZERThu Dec 05 1991 15:478
    This game worries me. I'm fairly certain the Broncos will win
    it. My concern is having Denver go out onto the field in front
    of thousands of fans who I believe genuinely hate them. This
    game has a very real potential for fan violence. Bronco fans 
    know that they have not hesitated to show that hand before. 
    It's a shame. It really is just a damn game.
    
    BoB
36.532QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 05 1991 16:2122
    
     /Jeff,
    
     I know... You're right.  If the donks lose I willhave much more 
    of the Black Bird to eat that you.  This is the one time of the year 
    that I can't help myself and things just fly off  the ends of my
    fingers before I can stop them.  Ask Groaner and Hal about that.
    Both have made at leats as outragous comments about this game as I
    have. At any rate,  This is big fun for me and if I have to swallow
    some crow as the price then so be it.  I really don't think that 
    the Donks will lose this, no matter what happens.  I do hope how
    even that if the fans in Clevescum get out of hand that the management
    and zebras have the balls to do something about it for once.  It really
    sucks what they are allowed to get away with.  If the `Spots management
    had any cajones at al the would make sure that those in violation of 
    good fansmanship be ejected never to return.  the sad thing is that
    they encourge this kind of crap instead of taking a stand like Da
    Bears !!
    
    
    Big GAme
    
36.533Don't read the last line JackCOMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Thu Dec 05 1991 17:5616
      Since I won't be here tommorrow, (Gunnison business tommorrow and
    Crested Butte on Saturday) I will get my 2 pennies in now!
    
      The Browns are goin down,  Bernie to have int,  Atwater and Smith
    to put a hurt on Hoard and Mack,  and Elway to throw 2 TDs plus run for
    1.
    
      And if that don't happen,  who cares, 'cause the Broncos win by 3 or
    more.
    
      I hope that the fans won't be "involved"!!  If so,  fine the Clevland
    org for not taking proper security measures.
                                       
       Party at Big games house,  he's buyin' the brew ;^)))))))
    
    	Tim
36.534Kindler gentler Browns fans.. CIMNET::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Thu Dec 05 1991 18:176
    
    I kinda remember watching a game in Denver where the opposition got 
    pelted by 20K snowballs while attempting a fieldgoal and at other
    points in the game..   or at least I think I remember...  
    
    /Jeff
36.535EARRTH::BROOKSStardate 12.06.91 - BE THERE !Thu Dec 05 1991 18:234
    Yep ... Ray Wersching of the NIners missed a FG because he nearly got
    plunked by a well-timed snowball in the first half.
    
    The Niners lost by 2, if memory serves me right.
36.536Browns by 7ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Thu Dec 05 1991 19:425
    I hear mama's-boy is getting estrogen shots in his shoulder. What a
    wimp, the Donks should put him out to pasture. :-) This is probably his
    last mediocre year, than Moore will replace him in the spring. Maybe
    he'll take notes this weekend from a QB who knows how to play the game.
    
36.537That fan got tossed from the game!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Thu Dec 05 1991 19:4410
      That is correct.  The niners lost,  and all these niner fans started
    crying about "if he would of made it the 9rs would have won".  In the
    same breath,  the broncos (reeves) had the usual 1st and goal on the 2
    and tried 4x to punch it in,  and of course couldn't.  The donks were
    ahead at that time, thus the reason of 4 tries at a TD.  If the niners
    would have made that FG,  then reeves would not have gone for the TD, 
    when he was "almost" assured of a FG.   So the outcome would have been
    no different IMO.
    
       Tim
36.538URQUEL::SALZERThu Dec 05 1991 21:498
    Yes it was 1 (as in one) snowball, not thousands. In fact since 
    that event stringent security measures have been in place. In 
    fact I was at last sunday's game and a fan was immediatelly dismissed
    for throwing a snowball. He obviously didn't understand the 
    the rules that the fans must live by there. Cleveland's stadium
    seems to operate by a different standard.
    
    BoB 
36.539QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 05 1991 21:499
     No Tim...  That fan lost his season tickets....  you won't
    see a bs org like Clevescum do that though....  they thinks 
    it goodness..
    
    Big Game
    
    Elway has a much better record than Bernice will ever have that Cajones
    to dream about...  Screw the stats...  Who's been to the Bowl.!!!
    
36.540AXIS::ROBICHAUDGE Bowl?Fri Dec 06 1991 18:244
    	Gee, I wish every football team had fans as polite and mannerly
    as those Bronco fans.
    
    				/Don
36.541CSC32::SALZERFri Dec 06 1991 19:3714
    /Don nobody said they are polite and mannerly. In fact it can get
    real testy at times. The thing is, there has to be an understood 
    level of what's acceptable behavior and what's not. A large crowd 
    emotionally charged and an element of that crowd intoxicated 
    is a dangerous mix. Denver has figured a way to control quickly
    and effectively. You screw up and you pay the price. Nobody is 
    a faceless member of the masses that can act without being held
    accountable for that act. I was hoping one of the Browns group
    would take me to task or assure us that my opinion of Cleveland
    stadium antics is one of needless paranoia. That hasn't happened.
    Hopefully the Broncos will have them heading for the exits early.
    That will make all of this a moot point. 
    
    BoB  
36.542Ha!COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Mon Dec 09 1991 10:1418
       All in all this was a good win (not to ugly) for the Broncos.  They
    clinch a wild card and also 1st place in the west since the faiders
    CHOKED!!!!
    
      Elway had a decent day.  He "basically" gave Clevland their only
    points.  He overthrew some recievers,  and alot of recivers dropped
    balls.  Biff came right back after the INT and drove the Broncos to a
    TD.
    
      The offensive stat that sticks in my mind is only 2 TDs and 6 FGs in
    the 1st QTR.   This says what  most of us has seen,  which is the
    Bronco offense doesn't get "motivated" until the 2nd QTR.
    
      The offense is showing up for the 2nd half this year!   That is a +.
    
      The defense is GREAT!!
    
      Tim
36.543CAMONE::WAYSay no to Baby Butt CrackMon Dec 09 1991 10:5312
>       All in all this was a good win (not to ugly) for the Broncos.  They
>    clinch a wild card and also 1st place in the west since the faiders
>    CHOKED!!!!

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that Denver was 10-4 and LA 9-5.
It's possible they could still end up tied, in which case LA has the
tie breakers, or LA could still win it.

At least that's the impression I had....


'Saw
36.544FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Dec 09 1991 12:014
    They have clinched a wild card but have not clinched the division
    title.  
    
    John
36.545CNTROL::CHILDSHit &amp; Run Noter at LargeMon Dec 09 1991 12:579
 Saw you missed Tim's pause in there. He meant that it put them in first
 for this week not the season. Although effectively they should be a lock
 for first with their wimpy schedule while the Raiders play tough opponents.

 If anyone choked yesterday it was Norwood not the Raiders. Raiders' mistake
 was going into prevent offense too early...

 mike
36.546The Domination Continues !!!!!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 09 1991 13:1945
    
     YES !!  YES !!  YES !!
    
     Just what the doctor ordered for my B-day...  The Donks look like a 
    team inspired in the 2nd half. (I missed the first due to a birthday
    brunch planned W/O my knowledge)  All in all a good game for the Donks.
    the defense in taking control of ball games early.  The offense in not
    what it could be but they are getting the Job done.  A 10 pt victory
    over the `Spots is no small feat considering the level to which this
    rivalry has risen over the past few years.  The special teams need to
    work on coverage though...  things looked a bit thin at times and the 
    Clowns did have some good returns on them.  Treadwell's confidence
    should have been boosted after yesterdays outing.  He no trouble and
    nailed the coffin shut with the 4th quarter field goal.  The Donks
    are heading into the playoffs playing better than they have all year.
    I am looking forward to a good showing in post season.  Maybe not a
    Superbowl but a good showing none the less.
    
     I hope the Faiders never get rid of Wrong Way Jay...  I was sitting at 
    the folks house watching the game with my Dad (He hates the Donks, 
    calls `em the luckiest team he's ever seen.  (he's from Ohio)) and I 
    tell him the Jay will throw an INT and cost the Faiders the game.
    Sure enough,  right after Luckaolo ties it up old Wrong Way Jay comes
    out a throws a big time INT.  Yes old sure foot from the Bills missed
    the kick but it could have cost them.  It goes into OT and I say,
    whatch,  He'll do it again and he does.  `Bout this time the old boy is
    coming out of his chair,  it was too funny.  At any rate,  as long
    as Jay is playing for the Faiders they will never win a championship.
    The guy reminds me of Danny White in the 2 minutes.  And as for
    Luckaolo...  I wouldn't be surprised to see Norwood gone before the
    S.B.....  If not,  he could cost them big !!
    
    
    Donks ROOOOLLLLEEEEE !!!!
    
    `Spots Sip In Public
    
    Al Davis is kicking himself for ever letting Beureline go to Dallas
    
    Big  Game
    
    
    P.s.  I'll be pulling for the `Spots this week.  They'll probably drop
          the game against the Soilers on purpose just to get back at the
          Donks.
36.547BSS::JCOTANCHScott Norwood Fan ClubMon Dec 09 1991 13:2631
> If anyone choked yesterday it was Norwood not the Raiders. 
    
    Childs, don't kid yourself.  When you have a 2-touchdown lead with 5
    minutes to play at home and lose, that's a choke job, plain and simple.
    
    You gotta love the way the Denver D is playing now.  They've only given
    up more than 20 points all season and that was the disaster at Houston.     
    They're getting great pressure on the QB, and Croel and Powers are out
    right now.  It's a good thing that they were constantly pressuring
    Bernie yesterday or else he would've gotten the Browns into the end
    zone a little more.  The Browns should've kept using Mack yesterday -
    he was running right over the Bronco defense.  The one TD the Browns
    did score came after an interception at the Denver 37.
    
    The offense was decent yesterday, but they came through when they
    needed to in the 4th quarter.  The most impressive thing about
    yesterday is that Denver didn't run the ball well but still had a
    couple nice drives and managed over 35 minutes of possession time.
    
    Now if Denver can win their last 2 and get some help from Cleveland or
    the Giants (Houston's last 2 opponents) they will have a bye the first
    weekend of the playoffs.  That would mean alot.  Denver should wrap up
    the division next week by beating Phonyix at home while the Faids go to
    Nawlins and get whupped.
    
    GO SAINTS!!!!!
    GO BROWNS!!!!!
    
    
    Joe
36.548COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 09 1991 15:2522
      Yes I did say denver is in 1st place in the west.  Is that not where
    they stand today?   Sure they could choke and lose the division,  but
    not likely,  and they are in the playoffs,  this is all I stated.  I
    never said that they won the division.
    
      Denver does have a light schedule,  but thats what happens when you
    finish towards the bottom of the conference.  Don't worry Mike,  the
    sqeelers will get the cream puff schedule next year,  and the jints for
    that matter.
    
      Elway calling plays =  better play mix!!
    
      Denvers running game has been lacking the last 2 weeks!  The spots
    defense did a good job of shutting the run down.   I feel Humphrey may
    have helped,  but who knows.....
    
      Denver better not take this next game lightly,  'cause look at what
    the cards did to the 'skins yesterday.  They had a 14-0 lead just to
    lose it 20-14,  but they did scare the 'skins none the less.
    
    
    	Tim
36.549The Domination Continues !!1QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 09 1991 15:3421
    
     Tim,  
    
     I agree on both points.
    
     When Elway is calling plays the team seems to have a completely
    different look.  Notice the short passes, The use of Sewell as 
    a wide out.  Sweeps when the middle has been closed up.  John 
    is begining to show what he's really made of. 
    
     The Donks running game has been vurtually non-existent the past 3
    weeks.  If they plan to take another shot at the Superbowl they had
    better get that fixed.  Maybe Bobby would help.  He should be getting
    close to being able to play and should be given a chance if Greene 
    can't make things happen.
    
    Donks Will Win West !!
    
    Big Game
    
     
36.550COBRA::DINSMOREDay at a timeTue Dec 10 1991 18:116
    jack,
    
    do you work in the clean room there?
    
    dinz
    
36.551Cleanrooms are a gass to work in though !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 10 1991 19:046
    
     Used to long ago...  Work as a systems guy in Materials Acq. 
    now.  Got a real office and everything... (about 5 years now)
    Whats the point !!
    
    BG
36.553COBRA::DINSMOREDay at a timeTue Dec 10 1991 19:332
    I tried to call ya..
    
36.554GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishTue Dec 10 1991 20:228
    
    Hock,
    
    	I know Dave.  However, I work out here in da woods at the
    	FCC site so I don't see too many folks.....jest squirrels
    	and deer and such.  
    
    Claybone
36.555Another Classic !! Many ;^)'sQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 10 1991 20:3114
    Claywad..
    
     Is that what happened to you ???  I was wondering why I hadn't seen
    your UGLY face around here in a while..  Well, it's a good place for
    ya.  We can't have customers seeing you after that nasty accident you
    had with Big Bertha, her twin sister and the Blender...
    
     Kawk...  I know neiter of these so called friends of yours.  Maybe I'll
    look `em up to see if the exsist or are only a figment of a sick mind
    in need of a labotomy(sp?)
    
    Big Game
    
    
36.556CSLALL::TIMMONSTHEY MUSTA SEEN ME AT THE Y!Wed Dec 11 1991 09:1410
    Big Game, I was out there almost 7 years ago and did a tour of the
    Clean Room on 1st shift.  You musta been there.  I was the guy who was
    going crazy, cause I couldn't breath and I had an itch I couldn't
    scratch because of them darned suits.  :*)
    
    Worked a project with a guy named John Pritchard, he was a tech on the
    repair line.  Nice guy.  Wonder if he's still around there?  Also, I
    used to work with Russ Hamel, he's in Quality.
    
    Lee
36.557CAMONE::WAYI believe I'll dust my broomWed Dec 11 1991 10:2210
Hey, be nice to Claybone.

He's one of the Brotherhood, so if ya mess wif him, ya mess wif me.....



But I'd love to hear more about that blender deal.....8^)


'Saw
36.558watch out for them poachers Claybone...COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Dec 11 1991 11:2714
      Russ is still around.  He's a manager now doin' sumthin on the RA9x
    or small form factors....
    
     I have heard of the other guy,  but don't know him by name and face.
    
     All of the clean rooms are busier (sp?) than ever,  at least until the
    RA9x moves to Germany.  To my knowledge,  the RA8x, R31, R35, and 2.5"
    disk drives will be the only ones left.  I have heard about a 1.8" disk
    drive coming in June.  I guess its the size of a pack of ciggs.
    
      I haven't met Claybone yet,  but I would like to hear about this
    blender incident.....Sounds "interesting"
    
    	Tim
36.559It's a true story and would make a great horror movie !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 11 1991 13:2614
    
     LeE,
    
     Russ is still around...  I don't beleive that John work at Dec
    any longer.  At any rate,  you must have toured the manufacturing
    cleanroom to be hanging out with those guys.  At the time (7 years ago)
    I was working in the engineering cleanroom doing media qualifications
    for new products.  In that type of environment you don't get many
    visitors if you know what I mean,  Pretty hush hush.
    
     As for Big Bertha, her twin and the blender,  I'll leave clay to tell
    ya about that one.  ;^)
    
    Big Game
36.560GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishWed Dec 11 1991 14:1530
    
    lEe,
    
    	John Pritchard isn't at CXO anymore.  I don't know if he's
    	still with DEC.  
    
    Tim,
    
    	IF YOU WOULDA WENT TO JAKE'S FRIGGIN' GET TOGETHER YOU
    	WOULDA MET ME YOU GAVONA! :*)  
    
    	You're almost as bad as JoJ!
    
    	I don't have to worry about poachers.  The joggers and 
    	mountain bikers keep 'em away.  I did see some mountain
    	lion tracks on the trail that runs through the valley.
    	After finding the nearest big stick, I hightailed it back
    	here.
    
    Jack,
    
    	Ugly?  You oughta know.  You're so ugly that when you were
    	born, the Doc slapped your mother! :*)
    
    'Saw,
    
    	Thanks for the help, but I really don't need it with the
    	likes of these girlymons like Jack.
    
    Claybone
36.561GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishWed Dec 11 1991 14:187
    
    	Oh, and about Big Bertha, her twin, and the blender.......
    
    	Nobody saw me do it.  Nobody heard me do it.  Nobody took
    	pictures of me doing it.  I didn't do it!  ;^)
    
    	Claybone
36.562Bow-wow brown cowCSC32::SALZERWed Dec 11 1991 17:0510
    Broncos hit a nice trifecta sunday. They beat the dogs on their own
    turf, locked down a playoff spot, and with compliments to the Bills 
    took over first place alone. This all comes as a big surprise to me.
    Anti-Donks around the area are probably begining to feel some heat
    already. Yes the bowl performances have been dissapointing, but they
    sure have squashed a lot of other's plans along the way. A Broncos
    Bills game for AFC Championship does have a nice kind of ring to
    it. Let's see what happens. 
    
    BoB 
36.563COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Dec 11 1991 17:2314
      I'm like JoJ?  Gee thanks,  'cause I have met him ;^)  I would have
    made it to Jakes get together,  but my excuse as to why has since left.
    
      The reason why I said poachers is because they caught some guy
    between DEC and Pinon Valley with 6-7 deers in the back of his truck. 
    The dumbsh$% told someone over at the Rock about poaching in that area,
    and some engineer from here overheard him,  and told security who then
    informed the game commision and then sure enough,  he came back to do it
    again, and the game people surrounded him and had airial shots to prove
    his guilt.  Thats when they caught him with the 6-7 deer.
    
     I guess he is spending time in Canon city.
    
    	Tim
36.564GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishWed Dec 11 1991 17:4818
    
    	Well, out here, all you'd need to get a deer is a cookie
    	and a hammer ;^)
    
    re. Elway, HoF, from the Giants note
    
    	It won't break my heart if he doesn't make it.  He has
    	entertained this Bronco fan to no end and won more games
    	than he's lost.  That's all that matters to me.  Well, OK.
    	Maybe he could win a Super Bowl for me too. :^)
    
    	His highlight reel would be long.  Everything from "The Drive"
    	at Cleveland to his many "escape the rush and complete a 60
    	yard bomb" plays.
    
    	I'd vote him in but I'm biased.
    
    	Claybone
36.565BSS::JCOTANCHMon Dec 16 1991 12:5428
    The Denver Post headline says it all: "A Cardinal Sin...Almost"
    
    Ain't that the truth.  If Denver would've lost that would've clinced
    the bye for Houston and given the Faids a better shot at winning the
    division.  Denver can still get a bye for the first weekend of the
    playoffs if the Giants beat Houston Saturday and Denver beats San
    Diego.  Denver will win the AFC West tonight if the Saints beat LA
    tonight.  
    
    The AFC West title will be nice, but it won't mean a hell of a lot
    unless Denver can beat out Houston for the bye.  Denver is assured of
    playing their first playoff game at home, they just don't know if it
    will be the first or second weekend of the playoffs.
    
    Back to the Phoenix game.  Denver had some chances to put more points
    on the board in the first half.  When they had that 3rd and goal in the
    2nd quarter I don't know why they just didn't run a QB sneak.  And I
    think they should've gone for the TD on 4th down.  
    
    Denver got pretty banged up yesterday.  Perryman is out for the season
    and many other players got minor injuries.
    
    
    Go Saints!!!
    Go Giants!!!
    
    Joe
    
36.566Typical bronco nail biter.COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 16 1991 13:0421
      John finds a way to win despite 3 ints.   He was responsible for 9
    card points.  The fumble that Atwater caused was bogus,  Denver should
    have gotten the ball,  thus taking the last 3 points away from cards
    and denver never losing the lead.
    
      Denvers offense looked good at the start,  but then didn't take
    advantage of opprotunities.
    
     Defense played well as usual.
    
     Injuries are key here:
    
      Perryman out, Sewell, Meck,Russell,Dimry, Lang, & Traylor.
    
      I thought I saw Montgomery limping as well,  but he wasn't reported
    aas hurt in todays loco rag......
    
    
      After faids lose tonight,  the division is a lock!
    
    	Tim
36.567Are you ready for some football?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 16 1991 13:5810
    Keep dreaming Tim, the Raiders are gonna come marching in tonight!
    I think the Raiders showed everybody last week that they could outplay
    the best in the league (even if they lost), just like I think the
    clueless Donks showed everybody yesterday just how pathetic they really 
    are! Can't believe this team is even in the playoffs. Forget winning the
    Division, the Donks are gonna hit bottom next week against the
    Chargers, and then they'll go on to choke against their first playoff
    opponents guaranteed!
    
    Carlos
36.568good game for themDESERT::HEISERwise men still seek HimMon Dec 16 1991 14:051
    I watched yesterday's game.  The Cards looked almost competent.
36.569If Faids are within 10 tonight it'll be a miracleBSS::JCOTANCHMon Dec 16 1991 14:126
    RE .567
    
    SSDD
    
    
    Joe
36.570QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 16 1991 16:4118
    
    
     What A Game... !!!
    
     I was at Pile It High yesterday to watch the Donks come through with
    another in a long line of BIG wins.  The Donks played a great game and
    had to endure many bad calls by the Zebras.  The Cards were fired up 
    and were playing with the mind set that they had nothing to lose. When
    the fumble by the Cards was ruled down I thought the Zebras were in 
    deep do do so to speak.  The Stadium went nuts.  It was so loud you had
    to scream to the person next to you.  This was really a bad call and
    showing it on diamond vision and the park may not have been the best 
    idea.  The Donks are a lock for the Divison now,  There is no way the
    happless Faiders can win this game with wrong way jay at the helm. 
    Look for the saints to blow the faids out in N.O.
    
    
    Big Game
36.571Who was that other team?!?!COMET::SCOTTJTue Dec 17 1991 09:4810
    RE.568
    Carlos I'm new to this conference and maybe I'm newer to football than
    I thought, but with a final score of 27-0, yes the big goose egg zero.
    It looks like those Faiders of yours just showed up for their own
    funneral...Yes No...  I mean a team that can put only 102 yards of
    offense on the board and no points, well I wouldn't be bragging all
    that much.  Tell me what do you think!!!!!!!!
    
    Jim
    
36.572FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Dec 17 1991 10:358
    The Broncos win the Western Division.  The Broncos will have a first
    round bye with a win over San Diego on Sunday coupled with a Houston
    loss to the Giants on Saturday.  The Raiders and Chiefs will play each
    other back-to-back, with the winner on Sunday hosting the wild-card
    game and the winner of the Jets at Miami game playing at either Houston
    or Denver.
    
    John
36.573CAMONE::WAYI believe I'll dust my broomTue Dec 17 1991 10:439
Interestingly enough, I think it was Frank and Al who were talking
about the difference between being the 3rd Division winner and the
1st WC.  

I gather there isn't much, because you both play on "wild card weekend"
and you both play at home....


'Saw
36.574Read 'em and weep, Faider fans!BSS::JCOTANCHBroncos: 1991 AFC West Champs!!!!Tue Dec 17 1991 11:5720
    RE .573
    Yea Saw, that's what I was talking about in one of my earlier notes. 
    If Denver doesn't beat out Houscum for the bye, the division title
    doesn't mean anything more than pride.  If Houscum wins Saturday,
    Denver's game against San Diego on Sunday will be totally meaningless.
    
>    Keep dreaming Tim, the Raiders are gonna come marching in tonight!

    HAHAHAHA!  Hell, they couldn't even march into Saints' territory.  The
    only time they were in NO territory was after the blocked punt. 
    Faiders ran only FOUR plays all night in Saints territory.  Faids are
    lucky it wasn't about 47-zip.
    
>    Forget winning the
>    Division, 
 
    Yea, Faiders can forget it now!!!!!!!!
    
    
    Joe
36.575ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Tue Dec 17 1991 12:038
    All right, all right.....I'll take my crow with lots of ketchup please.
    What a suck that was last night, the Raiders bit it big time. Congrats
    to the Donks for winning the division, couldn'tve happened to a nicer
    team. I still say they'll be out of it after the first round though.
    After last night's performance I wonder if the Raiders will do any
    better?
    
    Carlos
36.576HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesTue Dec 17 1991 12:443
       The Raiders threw the game last night. They'd rather play KC, NY
    or Miami insteadof Houston in the playoffs. 
                                         Denny
36.577HHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 17 1991 12:4815
    
     D O N K S    RRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLEEEEEE !!!!
    
     Nice to see the real Raiders show up in NO lasted(tm) night.
    The Donks once againg prove their dominance over the AFC by
    putting together a tremendous run for the title after last years
    debachle of a season.  Them damn raiders really cost me....  I
    bet a buddy they'd lose and then when he started whining at half 
    time about how the Zebras were gonna steal the game from the Faids
    I felt sorry for him and went double or nothing that the Faids 
    didn't break 100 yrds total offense...  A measly 2 yards cost me 
    $20.00.  At any rate,  Go Broncos.... !!!!!
    
    
    Big Game
36.578The 100 years old Evans did better than Jay!COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Dec 17 1991 12:5120
      Well at least you belly'ed up to the crow bar Carlos!
    
      Denny,  I think your graspin' bud, I mean the faids choked in every
    way possible.  The faids fan that was at my house last night was still
    saying that the donks better hope they don't play LA in playoff's
    'cause they'll lose again,  and I don't see that,  not with Jay at the
    helm.
    
      Faids were gettin hurt last nite.  how many injuries did they end up
    with?
    
      Somethin tells me that the soilers will beat the now hapless jints, 
    so denver will most likely play the fish/planes winners.
    
      I wouldn't be suprised to see denver lose at SD this weekend.  Now
    that the division is won,  Elway may get his much needed rest for his
    shoulder.
    
    
       Tim
36.579BSS::JCOTANCHBroncos: 1991 AFC West Champs!!!!Tue Dec 17 1991 12:5322
>       The Raiders threw the game last night. They'd rather play KC, NY
>    or Miami insteadof Houston in the playoffs. 
 
    The game didn't really mean a whole lot to the Faids, but there wasn't
    any chance they'd play Houston even if they won.  If they had won, it
    only would've kept their division title hopes alive, adding a
    possibility that they would've played the Jets/Miami winner.
    
    Well, Denver's race for the bye week really takes on extra meaning now. 
    First, there's the issue of getting a week off to give some of the
    injuries a chance to get better.  But there's also the issue of having
    more time to sell playoff tickets.  30,000 season-ticket holders have
    decided not to purchase playoff tickets, meaning those tickets will
    need to sold 72 hours before game-time to lift the blackout.  If Denver
    doesn't get the bye, those tickets will need to be sold by Wednesday or
    Thursday of next week or else we won't be watching the Broncos here in
    the Springs.  If the game is blacked out, the blackout would take
    effect in a 100-mile radius of Denver.  A Bronco home game hasn't been
    blacked out in 22 years.
    
    
    Joe
36.580Donks on way to 5th bowl and a victory !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 17 1991 15:546
    Joe...  Never happen !!  Those ticket will be gone faster than you
    can say "Bernice is a Loser".  Donks tickets themselves are a hot
    commodity...  Play off tickets will be even hotter.  You can bet this 
    guy will be there !!
    
    BG
36.581Fans Abandon Hapless Donks - Film at 11!AXIS::ROBICHAUDRedSox,Broncos,MoriaLaschTue Dec 17 1991 16:401
    
36.582QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 17 1991 18:083
    Yea Right !!!  Dream on !!!
    
    Big Game
36.583At least I can relax this weekendBSS::JCOTANCHHow are the Faiders doing?Mon Dec 23 1991 13:5120
    First of all, many thanks need to go out to the Jints for giving Denver
    a chance to secure a bye for the playoffs next week.  And the Broncos
    didn't let that chance get away, although they tried.
    
    Defense was superb as has been the case all season, but they did have
    two badly timed letdowns that kept San Diego in the game.  SD didn't
    have a first down all half, but with about 4 minutes left in the half
    Denver let the Chargers promptly walk down the field and cut the lead
    to 10-7.  Of course, the Broncos should've had more than 10 points, but
    that's the way it's been with their offense.  Then, Denver appeared to
    take control with a TD late in the 3rd quarter to go up 17-7, but on
    the ensuing drive the Chargers were again allowed to walk down the
    field and get another easy TD.  At least they managed to hold on for
    the win.
    
    Now if the Chiefs can upset Luckalo after putting the Faiders out of
    their misery....
    
    
    Joe
36.584Great Win By The Broncos !!! Go K.C., Jets !!!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 23 1991 14:2111
     Great game by the MIGHTY DONKS...  Once again they prove they can win
    when the moneys on the table.  Great Int by Atwater,  This guy was a
    god send to the Donks defense.  Charles (Toast) Dimry show some signs
    of life yesterday and could very easily have had 2 int's.  Elway and
    the offense better spend the next 2 weeks playing catch.  I haven't
    seen so many poorly thrown balls and dropped passes in a dDOnks game
    since lasted(tm) year.  The Donks are Going to the Bowl !!
    
    Watch out Luckaolo...  Here come the Broncos !!
    
    BG
36.585COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 23 1991 14:4415
      I agree Jack,  Elway looked bad,  and when he did get the ball there, 
    the recievers were afraid to catch the potato.
    
      Wymon got hurt...toooooo bad!  I don't like to see people get hurt,
    but thats what it took to get him outta the game.   Dimry was doing
    just as bad for a while,  but did better at the end.  I would like to
    see Lang in there.
    
      Fletcher gets snubbed for pro-bowl again,  and yesterday he proved
    that he shouldn't have.  He is better than Connly? from Buff.
    
      Denver won't go all the way,  but they just might be in Buffalo in 3
    weeks.
    
    	Tim
36.586Post Season, Donks 0-1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 23 1991 14:508
    If they barely managed to pull out a squeeker against the worst team in
    the division, they don't have a prayer of getting to the big dance. I
    think the only team with a winning record that the Donks have beat are
    the Chiefs (twice)? It's easy to look good when you play against the
    worst teams in the league, let's see how well they do against real
    teams! Donks are going down in their first playoff game, guaranteed!
    
    Carlitos :-)
36.587COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 23 1991 15:028
      Well you are right about the winning record bit Carlos,  but at least
    we didn't lose to the Chargers.
    
       The Broncos have a very tough schedule next year 'cause they are a
    1st place team.   They may end up looking as bad as the faids did this
    year,  but time will tell.
    
       Tj
36.588ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Dec 23 1991 18:027
    >> They may end up looking as bad as the faids did this year,
    
    They'd be so lucky, unless this team does extremely well in the Plan-B,
    and draft, they will more than likely end up where they were last year,
    the bottom of the division where they belong...Haaaaha!
    
    Carlos
36.589Donk = AFC WEST CHAMPIONS... Faiders = Wilde car, barely !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Dec 23 1991 19:2828
    Carlos, 
    
     As much as I hate to contrdict a fellow Donks fan (Tim) the truth
    is that over the corse of the season the Donks have played a tougher
    schedule, percentage wise than Luckaolo.  I posted the numbers last
    week I think...  The were somewhere in the neighborhood of;
    
    			Team		Winning percentage of opposing teams
    			--------       -------------------------------------
    			Luckaolo  	.380 something
    
    			Denver		.450 something
    
    			Soilers		.489 something
    
     Also,  don't forget that the Donks had something to do with the fact
    that thos teams they beat don't have winning records.
    
     Yea,  the Donks will have a tough schedule next year.  there can be no 
    doubt about that.  But,  They have won the AFC West and The AFC coming
    off of a first place finish in the past and surely could do it again.
    The Donks should do well in plan B,  they've really turned around the
    draft and plan B process and have made some steller pick in both the
    past few years.
    
    FWIW
    
    Big Game
36.590Bowland's pockets deeper than uncle Al's...CNTROL::CHILDSBang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang!Tue Dec 24 1991 10:3513
36.591CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 24 1991 11:215
36.592Sat/Sun good daysRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Dec 30 1991 13:557
    Houston @ Denver, could be a good game, but again weather will have
    alot to do with it.  Just like Dallas @ Chicago, 60 degrees and not
    much wind from what I saw (Other then on a couple FG attempts).  If
    Houston can get so lucky as to have a very warm mild day in Mile High
    I think theyll beat the broncos.... Well have to wait and see...
    
    								Mab
36.593Kinda like a Jints-Cowboys gameHPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesMon Dec 30 1991 14:054
       Houston-Denver
       This is another onea those games where it's too bad somebody has to
    win!
                                        Denny
36.594Faiders did just that!COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 30 1991 14:0816
       This should be a good game.  If Denver presures Moon,  then the
    oilers will have a rough day.  If there is not alot of presure then the
    Denver defense and Elway will have a long day.
    
      Weather is definitely a factor.  I don't think the weather is going
    to be bad,  but maybe I'm wrong.  It shouldn't matter though, 'cause if
    Denver has to rely on crappy weather to beat a team,  then I will
    question their abilities to just beat a good team.
    
      I hope Denver beats the soilers just to keep everyone quite about the
    donks "can't beat a winning team".
    
      Look for a 20-17 type of game,  with of course my biased opinion of
    Denver winning.
    
    	Tim
36.595BSS::JCOTANCHSee ya in August, FaidersMon Dec 30 1991 14:138
>       Houston-Denver
>       This is another onea those games where it's too bad somebody has to
>    win!
    
    When you talk about it being too bad somebody has to win, last year's
    AFC Championship game comes to mind for me.
    
    Joe
36.596GENRAL::WADEMon Dec 30 1991 14:294
    
    	So, is the game Saturday or Sunday?  Early or late?
    
    	Claybone
36.597Get with the program, Clay :^)BSS::JCOTANCHSee ya in August, FaidersMon Dec 30 1991 14:564
    Saturday, 2pm MST.  Blackout should be lifted.
    
    
    Joe
36.598COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 30 1991 17:5311
      Still 7,000 tickets left.......If they black it out (which is
    unlikely),  then I'll be heading to the Dublin house.  I'm sure they
    can get it off the Satelite.
    
      I am suprised that there were so many tickets left.  Normally they
    are snatched the 1st day.  I have a chance to go and a ticket lined up, 
    but then $$$ are short,  and the wife isn't pleased about her not
    having a ticket.  Someone from the ski team has the ticket,  but will
    be in Steamboat Springs this weekend.
    
      Tim
36.599CTHQ1::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeMon Dec 30 1991 18:096
    Wow,
    7,000 tickets left in Mr Edsville?  That's unheard in that
    football-rabid country. What gives?
    
    MikeL
    
36.600BSS::JCOTANCHSee ya in August, FaidersMon Dec 30 1991 18:0910
>      Still 7,000 tickets left.......If they black it out (which is
>    unlikely),  then I'll be heading to the Dublin house.  I'm sure they
>    can get it off the Satelite.
    
    I heard it was illegal for bars to show NFL games that are locally
    blacked out.  Besides, even  if Dublin House could carry the game the
    place would be so packed it would be ridiculous.
    
    Joe
 
36.601COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Dec 30 1991 18:138
      I wouldn't want to drive to say Pueblo.  Theres nuttin down ther...
    
      I'm not going to worry.  I think that the remainder of tixs will be
    gone by Tuesday afternoon.
    
    	Go Broncos.   Best 12-4 team!
    
    	Tim
36.602too many heartaches, to cry over....CNTROL::CHILDSBang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang!Tue Dec 31 1991 10:555
   I'd say Jeff Riggen's cartoon goes a far way towards explaining the
   current emotions of the fans...

 ;^)
36.603BSS::JCOTANCHSee ya in August, FaidersTue Dec 31 1991 11:463
    Blackout will be lifted - only 1200 tickets left.
    
    Joe
36.604CSC32::SALZERTue Dec 31 1991 17:305
    It feels good to get excited about a Bronco game again. Denver should 
    win this one. Then KC here or at the Bills for bragging rights. 
    This is the time to turn up the heat. 
    
    BoB 
36.605CSC32::SALZERFri Jan 03 1992 19:3611
    The Oilers came to town last night. Pardee wants a rested team.
    They planed a light workout for today. Should be ideal weather
    conditions tomorrow. It's not a factor. 
    
    Broncos have been working hard. They practiced both New Years Eve
    and New Years day which kind of showed me they're taking this 
    game seriously. No blackout but I don't suspect anybody seriously
    thought there would be. Elway is going to throw left handed this
    game to save himself for next week. 
    
    BoB
36.606Not for the faint of heartCOMET::FARMERSat Jan 04 1992 23:029
    DENVER WIN'S!!!!!!!
    
         What a game. One of the all time Denver comeback victories ever.
    Elway is still the man with a mission. With the exception of Warren
    Moon I really enjoyed watching the trash mouths walk with their heads
    hung low. I hope Le-Lo Lang's hand is ok. I have normaly been just an
    observer of this note but this victory has me quite boisterous.
    
    Now let's see if K.C. can upset the Bill's.....
36.607CAMONE::WAYHigh-toned son of a bitchMon Jan 06 1992 09:221
Elway Schools Moon -- film at 11
36.608Not good enough to win.JUNCO::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Mon Jan 06 1992 09:462
    
    	Denver was given the game!
36.609BSS::JCOTANCHSee ya in August, FaidersMon Jan 06 1992 12:0357
Elway does it...again.  You can talk about his 0-fer record in Super Bowls or
his mediocre stats, but what he did Saturday was incredible.  Like Parcells
said on NFL Live Sunday morning, when it's 4th down on a last-minute drive in
the playoffs, that's as high a pressure situation as it gets in the NFL.

It's so ironic that the offense comes through on a day when the defense is
playing as poorly as they've played all year.  The offense has struggled 
virtually all season but scored 3 TD's for only the third time since opening
day.  On defense, Denver just couldn't get any pressure on Moon.  And when 
they did, Moon would make a nice move to escape.  Needless to say, Moon 
played one hell of a game - I totally expected Houston to come into Denver 
and just play terrible.  I didn't think Moon could run like that and the scoop
pass to a running back as he was going down was unbelievable.

Any replies here in Sportsnotes that suggest Denver was unlucky or 
undeserving, well, that's just not true.  Here's a team that has been carried 
by their defense most of the way this season, and they suddenly can't stop the
Oilers until the very end, and even then Houston was able to take quite a bit 
of time off the clock and then nails a punt at the 2-yard line.  Three 4th 
down conversions, the last two of which would've ended Denver's season and the 
first probably would've also.  And these weren't 4th and inches or half a yard, 
either.  We're talking 4th and 4, 4th and 6, and 4th and 10.  When John took 
off running on the 4th and 6, I didn't think he was gonna make it.  And when 
it came to the 4th and 10 three plays later, I just said to myself that this 
was too much to ask of a team that's been barely hanging in there all day.  
The stats were virtually even: Houston led in total yards by 4; Houston led 
in possession time by 52 seconds; turnovers were even.  Houston got a huge
break in the 1st half on that roughing the passer call on Atwater's pick on
a play that featured the latest flag in NFL history.  That was very possibly
a 14-point swing. 

Some unsung heroes in the game:
Sewell - Can you believe there was talk during training camp that this guy 
migh not even make the team?
Kubiak - Great job on the game-winning FG with the poor snap.
Vance - Maybe not really an unsung hero, but he's done quite a bit the past 
2 months or so and has probably surpassed Michael Young as Denver's clutch
receiver.  He's still afraid to take a hit or will run out of bounds, but he
has made the big catch when Denver has needed it.

Now it's onto the AFC Championship game in Buffalo.  Denver's 4th in 6 years
and Luckalo's 3rd in 4 years.  Meanwhile, Houston has been to the playoffs the
past 5 years but has failed to reach the AFC Championship game during that time.

I don't think Denver will win.  Not because of how Denver's defense suddenly 
looked so vulnerable against Houston.  Not because of how Buffalo dismantled a 
KC team (which failed to show up BTW, but that's not my point).  The biggest 
reason I think Luckalo will win is simple: home field.  In their last 3 home 
playoff games the Bills have looked virtually unbeatable with the possible 
exception of the divisional playoff against Miami last year.  That crowd will 
be extremely loud and rowdy come Sunday and Luckalo will have the momentum 
from the opening kickoff.  I'm not saying it will take a miracle for Denver to
win, but they will need to play a very good game and keep their composure in a 
hostile environment - something Denver is not especially known for.


Joe
36.610FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Jan 06 1992 12:1015
    I give Denver and especially Elway lots of credit for coming back the
    way they did.  This last-minute drive stuff is making an Elway believer
    out of me.
    
    I give Houston's offense lots of credit.  24 points should have been
    enough to win that game.  As Glenn said in another note, turning the
    ball over to Denver on the 2 with 2:07 to go and no timeouts should
    have been enough.  Denver converted 2 4th downs on their final drive. 
    I didn't see the end of the game because I was on my way to Springfield
    for the Oklahoma at UMass game, but there's no excuse for 2 defensive
    breakdowns like that.
    
    I feel very, very badly for Warren Moon.
    
    John
36.611Excellent synopsis, Joe...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 06 1992 12:101
    
36.612The crowdCOMET::FARMERMon Jan 06 1992 12:404
    Take the crowd out early.....that's the key. But they have shown they
    can play well in Buffalo even though they lost 27-28 last year. If they
    hit on something big early it could be all they need.....
    
36.613GENRAL::WADEMon Jan 06 1992 12:4325
    
    	I feel bad for Moon also.  The man played a great game but
    	they lost.
    
    	However, I feel GREAT for the Donks! :^)  I can't say enough
    	about Elway.  Like I said in a previous note pertaining to
    	him making/not making the HOF, he has entertained this Bronco 
    	fan to no end.  
    
    	I don't know if that's a fair assessment of the D Joe.  They
    	looked like a sieve early but held Houston to 3 points in the
    	last 40:?? of the game.  Almost 3 quarters!  It was rare to see
    	them adjust so well.
    
    	Ole Todd Christenson was giggling his fool haid off when Givens
    	was giving Elway the business after an incomplete pass.  Then,
    	when Dimry dumped Givens on his face, Todd gets all bent out of
    	shape.  I thought it was justice in motion.  They should bar all
    	ex-raiders from the booth! ;^)
    
    	Houston woulda won that game if they had a running game to run
    	out the clock.  A couple of those pass incompletions really helped
    	the Broncos out in the last minutes of the game.
    
    	Claybroon
36.614Now if someone would have done that to Deion...SHALOT::MEDVIDpaint me in leatherMon Jan 06 1992 13:176
    For me, it was a pleasure to see Givens' body shuddering in real pain
    instead of that "thing" he does after a good catch or a TD.
    
    What goes around...
    
    	--dan'l
36.615COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Jan 06 1992 13:219
       Cream Puff schedule = AFC Championship game for Broncos?   They
    proved they are as good as AFCs top teams.  Good enough to go to SB,  I
    don't think so,  but they recovered from a loosing season better than
    anyone else has with the exception of the cowgirls.
    
    
       Will the bandwagon start now?
    
    	Tim
36.616RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Muddy Mudskipper SHowMon Jan 06 1992 13:3510
    Great game.  Moon and Elway played great.  But Pardee was outcoached.
    
    If the Broncos keep it close, they'll win.  buffalo doesn't seem to
    thrive on close games.
    
    Do what the Giants did.  Whack Andree Reed around a little bit.  
    
    Hoping for a non-blowout.
    
    JD
36.617LAGUNA::MAY_BRNeed one of those endolphin rushesMon Jan 06 1992 13:4213
    
    The big difference next week is that Denver will be playing a team with
    decent linebackers.  I don't think Buffalo's lb's would have allowed
    Elway to scramble for the 1st down on the last drive the way Houston
    did.
    
    As a relatively objective listener(not a fan of the Broncos, Oilers, or
    Raiders, I thought Christenson was relatively unbiased, and at times
    seemed to be pro-Denver--especially when talking about Reeves).  I
    think a lot of Bronco fans don't like an ex-Raider doing their g ames.
    
    
    Bruce
36.618COBRA::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Mon Jan 06 1992 13:4511
   Something tells me that the Donks will change the pattern they've 
  established over the past several years...



  And get the living crap kicked out of them in the AFC championship
 game instead of the Super Bowl.

 [isfh]
    
36.619BSS::JCOTANCHHow'd the Faiders to this weekend?Mon Jan 06 1992 13:5816
    RE: Denver's defense
    
    Houston may have only scored 3 points in the 2nd half, but Denver
    really didn't stop them at all.  Missed FG, FG after a near-TD, and
    then Houston did have to punt at the end but only after eating up some
    valuable time and moving the ball nearly into FG range.  And Houston
    was probably only stopped on that last possession (the one where they
    punted) because they were being conservative.  Houston didn't need a
    score at that point.
    
    I always listen to the radio during Bronco games so I hardly ever hear
    Charlie Jones and Todd Christensen, but it's hard to believe that's
    NBC's 2nd-best crew.
    
    
    Joe
36.620CSC32::J_HERNANDEZThe dirtiest player in the gameMon Jan 06 1992 14:056
    What a game! Not a donkey fan but gotta give Elway credit for coming
    thru when da chips was down.
    
    I'll g out on a limb and say Denver will beat da Bills.
    
    THERE! Now they're jinxed!
36.621COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Jan 06 1992 14:096
      Thanks for the jinks DD!  It won't matter I don't feel.  As long as
    its a good game.
    
    	Please no 77 second season ender,  AGAIN!
    
    	Tim
36.622Congrats to the Donks!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Mon Jan 06 1992 14:138
    I thought Christiansen did a good job commenting, he seemed to be
    pro-Elway (and Denver) throughout the game, with the exception of Dimry
    slamming Givens on his neck which is very understandable, the guy's a
    worm for doing that, Givens was clearly going out of bounds and there
    was no need for that. Had it been an Oiler player that slammed 'the
    Vance' I'm sure you guys would be totally outraged.
    
    Carlos
36.623yCOMET::FARMERMon Jan 06 1992 15:418
    I agree with the last note. Dimry's actions should have been cause for
    an ejection. Givens and the trashmouths are just trying to jibe the
    opponents enough that it will effect their game. Elway's drive was
    satisfaction enough to shut up the trashmouths....
    
    
    
    Drew
36.624RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Muddy Mudskipper SHowMon Jan 06 1992 15:507
    Carlos -
    
    Can't see how you thought Todd was pro-Denver/Elway.  He and Charlie
    Jones (oh, I don't like Mr. Jones at all) were absolutely wetting
    themselves over Warren Moon and the 'tough' Oiler receivers.
    
    JD
36.625What! Me Worry?CSC32::SALZERMon Jan 06 1992 16:0915
    Well here we are again. One invite away from the big dance.
    I said earlier last week that Denver should have won that game
    but that was incorrect. It turned out Houston *should* have won.
    Moon's performance was nothing short of spectacular and it hurt
    bigtime for all of them. They say it's a game of inches. I maintain
    the difference in a close game is much less than that. 
    
    Sensors detected a disturbance of 4.5 on the Richter scale saturday
    evening. It turned out it was all the Bronco fans hitting their
    ceilings and bouncing off walls all over the region after the 
    4th and 10 completion.  I was nearly a physical and emotional 
    wreck by the time Treadwell steped up to kick. Like Chris Berman
    said, that was the NFL at it's finest. 
    
    Bob
36.626Elway Index on the rise; Crash coming soon ???SCNDRL::HUNTFenestracryptographer WannabeMon Jan 06 1992 16:187
I had forgetten how quiet this conference was lasted year when the Donks 
were home sipping hot cocoa during the playoffs.

Could make a lotta money selling Elway Index Futures.   The guy bounces 
between bumhood and sainthood like a kid's yo-yo.

Bob Hunt
36.627Big Bad JohnANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohnMon Jan 06 1992 16:531
    
36.628Big GamesCOMET::FARMERMon Jan 06 1992 17:096
         Although Denver does seem to take a dive during the "big" dance
    they seem to usually come through in all the others. Remember What all
    the talk was before the Cleveland game in 87? Denver was going to die.
    They came through in the clutch. Let's hope they can do it again..
    
    Drew
36.629AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithMon Jan 06 1992 17:348
    	Ron Hobson of the Patriot Ledger said that the reason the Broncos
    got blown out of the Super Bowls they were in was because Elway
    takes the team one round further than they should go.  I disagree
    with that assessment for the '90 season, but other than that he's
    right on the money.  If the Bills blow out the Donkeys it shouldn't
    be an indictment of Elway, but it probably will be.
    
    				/Don
36.630NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 06 1992 18:0218
    
    > If the Bills blow out the Donkeys it shouldn't
    > be an indictment of Elway, but it probably will be.
      
    Let's see how the game goes.  If Elway plays well (as Moon did) but the
    Buffalo offense proves too much for Denver's defense (as it probably
    will), I'll be the first to give Elway his due.  (As we discussed 
    earlier, Elway has played only passably in maybe one Super Bowl game in
    spite of Denver's defensive problems.)
                       
    Denver at this point certainly hasn't gone one round further than
    expected.  Of all the experts I saw all week, I didn't hear one that
    gave Houston a chance on Denver's home field, even against the spread.
    This seemed to be everyone's "sure thing" game, but it didn't turn out
    that way.
    
    glenn          
    
36.631glenn is wrong wrong wrong 1-2-3 he cain't seeANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohnMon Jan 06 1992 18:2011
    Playing "passably" [sic] is largely a function of whether the QB is 
    forced to chuck it up when everybody knows he's going to cuz his 
    defense has collapsed and the team is trying to hang on.
    
    John (Big Bad John) has certainly taken this team much farther than
    any a the preseason prognosticators thought he could.
    
    The most common dog bet of the weekend (by a very wide margin) was
    taking the 2-3 points and the Toilers on the road.
    
    MrT
36.632No, I cain see (and remember) very clearly, thank youNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 06 1992 18:2713
    
    > Playing "passably" [sic] is largely a function of whether the QB is 
    > forced to chuck it up when everybody knows he's going to cuz his 
    > defense has collapsed and the team is trying to hang on.
    
    Huh?  What about before the defense has collapsed?  Denver looked like
    they were going to roll during the first quarter in the Bowl against 
    Washington but the offense blew mega-opportunities before the 'Skins
    pulled themselves together, and Elway looked like he got off the bus
    dazed and confused in the 'Frisco game...
    
    glenn
    
36.633Donks Might just slip by Luckaolo but I won't bet the farmQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Jan 06 1992 18:2910
    
     Don't have much time today...  Just returning from vacation
    and I'm burried...
    
    The Donks pulled off another come from behind win and John "HOF"
    Elway was awsome...
    
    Gotta love it !!
    
    Big Game
36.634Elway is unbelievable... One og the GREATEST OF ALL TIME !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Jan 06 1992 20:0530
    
     I'm back !!
    
     I agree with all of what Joe said.  Joe,  that was a fine commentary
    on one of the leagues best games ever.  The Donks may just surprise 
    the "Experts" this comming Sunday when they visit the Bills on their
    home turff.  The Donks always play tough in Big Games (less the SB)
    and have proven all year that they can win on the road.  The Donks
    will have to play a perfect game if the Bills are on like they were
    against K.C..  If the Bills are playing an average game at home I think
    the Donks stand a good cahnce of going to the SB.  I really hope
    that they do and that John finally gets the SB victory that he so
    deserves.  
    
    Heres to the MIGHTY DONKS and their great season, no matter the out
    come of nexted(tm) weeks game.
    
    My prediction with teams current status;
    
    
    		Broncos  24
    
    		Bills	 21
    
     I may be swinging on a very weak limb, but hell, they are my team 
    and I support them to the end !!
    
    GO BRONCOS....  Make Colorado Prouder than you already have !!
    
    Big Game
36.635COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Jan 06 1992 20:144
      Swingin' on a limb BG?   You have been watching the Oracle to much. 
    That boy has been doing his balancing act all year.
    
    	Tj
36.636Donks 24 Bills 21 Yes, I'm for real !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Jan 06 1992 20:2615
    
     Tim,
    
     I really feel that the Donks can win this game.  Like I said,  They
    will have to play a perfect game but stranger things have happened.
    the scene in Mile High should prove that to any doubters !!  Like
    Revees said.  "When you have #7, anything can happen"  The Donks 
    historicly play well in Luckaolo...  look for a close game and in
    a close game I can't think of anyone better to have at the helm than
    our man ELWAY !!!
    
    
    Go Donks !!
    
    Big Game
36.649This is extremely premature, but still interestingBSS::JCOTANCHHow'd the Faiders to this weekend?Mon Jan 06 1992 21:0313
    
>    Now if I could figure a way to convert ya to NDism
    
    Well Mike, it appears there may be hope yet.  Mel Kiper predicts the
    Broncos will select Mirer in the first round.  Of course, I still
    wouldn't be an ND fan, but at least I'd be a big fan of one of their
    former players.  
    
    Hey, that's about as close as you can expect it to get.  :^)
    
    
    Joe
       
36.637CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementMon Jan 06 1992 22:2011
    Could it be
    
    Yep, it is
    
    
    HAL "Big'n'Lame" HUNTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
    
    (8^0*
    
    JaKe
    
36.638Thats A Real Slam !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSMon Jan 06 1992 22:2920
    Listen Jerk...  I Mean JaKe...
    
     I resent you makin a compairison between me and HAL...  There
    is not one outragous comment in any of my replies today.  I 
    guess to live up to your comparision I'll go ahead and make one
    now...
    
    
    
     The Steelers will be in the SB nexted(tm) year...
    
     HA HA HA !  Thats a Joke...  Wonder what kind of hack they'll hire 
    to complete the job of draging them down to the likes of the Clowns
    that Knoll Started.
    
    ;^)
    
    HAL, I Am Not !!!
    
    Big Game
36.639CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementMon Jan 06 1992 22:3414
    
    >> I resent you makin a compairison between me and HAL...  There
    >>is not one outragous comment in any of my replies today.  I 
         ^^^ ^^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
    
    I agree, it's more like 15 or 20!!!!
    
    You Donk fans should be hoping that Buffalo beats the Donks 'cause
    there'd only be ANOTHER HUGE embarrassment in the Super Bowl!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
36.640HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesTue Jan 07 1992 09:534
       You're not taking bets on that prediction are you Big and Gamey? If
    so, PLEASE send Mail!!
       BTW, Elway looks like Trigger.
                                       Denny
36.641It hurts, but it's the truthTALLIS::SNDCSL::HAUSRATHWhere is Fee Waybill Now???Tue Jan 07 1992 10:098
    
    Come on, Denver fans..   How can any of you honestly believe that 
    Big-bad-john and company are gonna make it to the bowl this year..  
    
    After all, you're forgetting one important point about the AFC Championship
    game...
    
    They're not playing the BROWNS!!!!!!!   
36.650Mirer a Donk? Git that benchseat readyCTHQ2::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeTue Jan 07 1992 11:0113
    Broncos to select Mirer? To sit on the bench ala Steve Young for
    another decade. If the only team that'll draft him high is the Donks,
    watch for him to stay at ND. I assume his old man is making the calls
    now to find out the interest in him.
    IMO, he's making a mistake in leaving as I think he's been real
    inconsistent at ND. Don't know how marketable he really is. Got to
    admit though, that his Sugar Bowl performance didn't hurt his chances
    of going in the first coupla rounds. Be interesting to see how he
    matches up with the other QB's ( Sacca, Matthews, Weldon, etc.)
    Here's hoping he stays, but that's purely a selfish thought.
    
    MikeL
    
36.651FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jan 07 1992 11:265
    Actually, he may not be sitting on the bench ala Steve Young for
    another decade.  Gary Kubiak is retiring after this season and John
    Elway will be in his 10th season in 1992.
    
    John
36.644AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithTue Jan 07 1992 12:1813
36.645Broncos are one of the best teams in football, consistently !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Jan 07 1992 12:5217
    
     No, I'm nat taking anymore bet...  I have a few peso's out there 
    already.  
    
     The Donks might just make it to the Bowl this year.  Remember, any
    thing can happen.  The Donks play the Bill's tought in Luckaolo and
    I don't see that changing significantly for this game.  If  it's a 
    close game,  The Donks will be heading to the land of 1000 lakes,
    bet on that.  
    
     If the Donks Lose this comming weekend, so be it.  They have had a
    great season and have turned things around from what looked to be a
    certin nose dive into the cellar for many years to come.  
    
    Go Donks...  Prove The Doubting Thomas' Wrong !
    
    Big Game
36.646COBRA::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Tue Jan 07 1992 13:027
 
    >>>   -< Broncos are one of the best teams in football,  consistently !! >-
    
          The Broncos are on of the best teams in the *AFC* consistently.
         There's a big difference. Every year in the Elway Era that they
         got their butts kicked in the Super Bowl there were about three 
         NFC teams that were better than them.
36.652He's probably to competitive though !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Jan 07 1992 13:166
    Elways contract is up in 1 year...  I wouldn't be surprised to see him
    hang `em up after that...  after all,  he's already made 17 million $$$
    playing for the Donks and has remaind relitively un-hurt.  He'd be
    smart to call it a career and enjoy the $$$ he's already made !!
    
    BG
36.647It's hard to teach the blind to see hte light !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Jan 07 1992 13:206
    
     What ever...
    
     I quit,
    
    BG
36.648Envious or jealous?COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 07 1992 13:2520
      I think the someone better check my replies and what I predicted this
    coming weekend.   I'm usually a realist.  There are some Bronco fans
    that predict a win.  I'm not one of them!!!  I think there are some
    that expect Denver to get their butts kicked,  but won't reply in here.
    
      Denver does have a chance (any given sunday),  but I just don't see
    it since the Bills are on a "home" roll!   As long as Denver makes a
    game of it,  then it will be worth watching (like I wouldn't anyway).
    
      Denver has had a great nerve racking season,  and they did prove they
    could beat Houston & KC.  Yes those are the only 2 teams with winning
    records that they did beat,  but most (not all) of the AFC had the same
    problem.  Denver beat Minny at Minny.  Minny didn't always roll over
    and die,  they did beat SF in week 4?
    
      Anyway,  heres to a good game,  and may yourr favorite team win (if
    they are still in)......
    
    
    	Tim
36.653COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 07 1992 13:386
      Denver does need another QB.   They picked up Shawn Moore last year, 
    and I think he has a good arm,  but now that Gary is outta there,  then
    another QB would be great.  Heck,  Steve Young would fit in great with
    the broncos.  He's a scrambler!
    
    	Tj
36.653SASE::SZABOWish it was a 6 paycheck month.Tue Jan 07 1992 13:426
36.655COBRA::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Tue Jan 07 1992 13:535
    
      I ain't envious or blind just realistic. Until the Broncos do 
     something more than continue to set new lows for Super Bowl in-
     eptness they can't be considered a great team nor Elway a great 
     quarterback.
36.656CARROL::LEFEBVREPojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPiecesTue Jan 07 1992 13:573
    Hawk, who the hail is this guy Jeffires?
    
    Mark.
36.657FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jan 07 1992 14:114
    Mark, Jeffires is the correct spelling for the last name of Houston WR
    Haywood Jeffires, even though it's pronounced Jeffries.
    
    John
36.658nexted year he get's Ninja Turtle blimp!CST17::FARLEYR.I.P. Grandma, say Hi to Mom &amp; Dad :*(Tue Jan 07 1992 14:2210
    Sheesh!
    
    My guess is the 'Postraphe Police got a T.I. "Learn to Spell" for
    Christmas!!!!!!
    
    ;^)
    
    remaining Santa's helper, I am,
    Kev
    
36.659GENRAL::WADETue Jan 07 1992 14:357
    
    	Tommy,
    
    	I'll just bet you can come up with 1 QB who is great but never
    	won the big'n.
    
    	Claybroon
36.661Youu got me started nowCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 07 1992 14:484
      Notice "most" of the people putting down Elway & Broncos are the
    people who's teams are out golfing instead of watching game films?
    
    	Tim
36.662BSS::JCOTANCHHow'd the Faiders to this weekend?Tue Jan 07 1992 14:5221
>     If the Donks Lose this comming weekend, so be it.  They have had a
>    great season and have turned things around from what looked to be a
>    certin nose dive into the cellar for many years to come.  

    You've been listening to too many of those 'expert prognosticators,'
    Big Game.  Denver was no more destined for a run of bad years than the
    current Cowboys.  Last year was an aberration caused by a combination of
    problems.  It's happened all around the league: Giants in '87, Bears in
    '89, etc.
    
>    Elways contract is up in 1 year...  I wouldn't be surprised to see him
>    hang `em up after that...  after all,  he's already made 17 million $$$
>    playing for the Donks and has remaind relitively un-hurt.  He'd be
>    smart to call it a career and enjoy the $$$ he's already made !!
    
    IMO Elway doesn't plan on retiring any time soon - at least certainly
    not after next year.
    
    
    Joe
 
36.663Good not greatCOBRA::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Tue Jan 07 1992 15:1515
    
    re .659
    

     Sure Claybroon, I can come up with a *few* great QB's that have 
    never one the big one but none that have fared nearly as badly in
    it as Elway has on a consistent basis.

     My original note was in response to the Donks being labeled as being
    'consistently' one of the best teams in the NFL. My contention was that
    they've been one of the best teams in the *AFC* not necessarily the
    NFL. They've lost three SB's in the Elaway Era by an aggregate of more 
    than a hundred points. 'Nuff said.
    
     
36.664ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohnTue Jan 07 1992 15:1922
    >Until the Broncos do something more than continue to set new lows for
    >Super Bowl ineptness they can't be considered a great team...
    
    I'll buy that.  We don't don the "G" string if it's much too big for
    us.  Don't deserve to if you cain't fill it out.
    
    >... nor Elway a great quarterback.
    
    Now wait just a minute.  What about all the great players in team
    sports who never got a ring?  Do we discount them too?  There are
    dozens a ringless HoFers out there.  It's to John's credit (Big Bad
    John) that he's continually pulled this team, poor pass protection,
    undersized DL, bad running game and all up into so many Conf. Title
    games and SBs.  
    
    I think a argument that John (Big Bad John) cain fill out that "G"
    string to the point it will snap cain be made whether or not he ever
    makes it to another Bowl or wins one.  He's only one main on a squad
    a 45 players.  This ain't boxing or tennis or golf or even hoops you
    know.
    
    MrT
36.665Donks *ARE*QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Jan 07 1992 15:268
    So let me get this straight,  You can't be "consistently one of the
    best teamt in the NFL" unless you win the Superbowl or are in the NFC.
    Ok, I see now... Sorry I was so far out of line.  I'll be sure to get
    my facts straight before making such an outlandish statement again.
    
    Give it a rest !
    
    BG
36.667CSC32::J_HERNANDEZThe dirtiest player in the gameTue Jan 07 1992 15:589
    All you Donk fans remind me a_Heiser, always hedging his bets. Show
    some ganos. I ain't even a Donk fan and I predicted another
    Champeenchip win. kelly will throw three intros in the first half and
    Big bad John (thanks T. what a great name) will throw 3 tds. Look for
    Denver to win a laugher. 
    
    
    
    Who was the last AFC team to beat Denver in postseason?
36.668NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 07 1992 16:1014
    > So let me get this straight,  You can't be "consistently one of the
    > best teamt in the NFL" unless you win the Superbowl or are in the NFC.
    > Ok, I see now... Sorry I was so far out of line.  I'll be sure to get
    > my facts straight before making such an outlandish statement again.
    
    In the last 5-10 years the Broncos would have to rate behind NFC teams 
    San Francisco, Washington, the New York Giants, and Chicago by any 
    objective measure.  If #5 qualifes as "consistently one of the best
    teams in the NFL" then you're absolutely correct.  In baseball it
    usually wouldn't get you in the playoffs...
    
    glenn
    
36.669GENRAL::WADETue Jan 07 1992 16:168
    
    	Well, I went to the "Hoot School of Predictions".  Our motto
    	is "Make No Predictions, Eat No Crow". :*)
    
    	Don't get me wrong.  I'll be rooting like crazy for them.
    	There is nothing wrong with realizing how good Buffalo is.
    
    	Claybroon
36.670CSC32::SALZERTue Jan 07 1992 16:269
    24 points saturday was the second highest scored against Denver this
    season. It was Houston again which scored 42 in their first meeting.
    Ever since last season's collapse and squeeker win by the Bill's
    I have patiently been waiting for a rematch. Odds makers and 
    experts don't have much hope for the Broncos.  I believe they
    have a lot going for them starting with working the Oilers' passing 
    attack as a tuneup. 
    
    BoB
36.671HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesTue Jan 07 1992 17:003
       Jist remember Donk fans, MorT also predicted a Denver win over the
    'sissy ' 9ers a few Bowls ago.
                                        Denny
36.672the real sourceCNTROL::CHILDSBush Go Home! no you keep himTue Jan 07 1992 17:017
hey I tagged BBJ that years ago and the B is for bad as in horrible
player...

any broncos fan can tell ya that....

mike
36.673QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Jan 07 1992 17:0117
    
     Glenn,
    
     The Broncos must be rated in the top two for 3 of the last six since
    they went to the Superbowl.  If this is not fact then the whole playoff
    scene is a big scam.  The Broncos were the best in the AFC the 3 years
    they went to the SB.  The year SF beat them I don't think they would
    have lost to anyother NFC team.  The year the lost to the Skins they
    surely wouldn't have  and the year the Midgets beat them the Midgets
    were the only good team to speak of in the NFC.  Wake up Pal...  The
    Donks are at the top and their consistent return to the championship
    games proves that.
    
    Heres to the AFC...   May they provide the biggest butt whipping the 
    NFC has had in a long, long, long time !!
    
    BG
36.674WELL said Big Game! Bravo !!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohnTue Jan 07 1992 17:211
    
36.675CSC32::J_HERNANDEZThe dirtiest player in the gameTue Jan 07 1992 17:268
    >>>The year SF beat them I don't think they would
    >>>have lost to anyother NFC team.
    
    
    Whoa there Big Numb, The Rams woulda crushed dem Donks, Hail, even the
    Jints woulda beat them that year. 
    
    
36.676JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Jan 07 1992 17:305
    beat me to it, didn't the Rams beat the 49ers in both their regular
    season meetings that year?
    
    
    py
36.677AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithTue Jan 07 1992 17:307
    	Okay MorT, here's the deal.  You get the Donkeys and 11 points
    for a P-Name bet.  If the Broncos win or cover I have to carry that
    disgusting "Homer,Plato,Voltaire,BobKnight" personal name for a
    week.  BUT, if the Bills win and cover you take my P-Name for a week.
    Whaddaya say? 
    
    				/Don
36.678HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesTue Jan 07 1992 17:332
       Fat chance /Don. He's skeered.
                                      Denny
36.679DD predicts broncos win? Hexer!!!COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 07 1992 17:404
      Are the Broncos playing the brownies this week?   This file hasn't
    been this active since week 15!!!
    
    	Tim
36.680ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYTammany,Daley,Stalin,FarleyTue Jan 07 1992 17:575
    Ain't skeered.  Hell, I been one a Dave Smith's biggest fans for
    years.  Had him on my rote team for two years for gawd's sakes
    and steal regret having traded him.  
    
    MrT
36.681BSS::JCOTANCHHow'd the Faiders to this weekend?Tue Jan 07 1992 18:0013
>    Mark, Jeffires is the correct spelling for the last name of Houston WR
>    Haywood Jeffires, even though it's pronounced Jeffries.
    
    When I saw his name on his back during the game Saturday I though it
    was spelled wrong.  
    
>    Who was the last AFC team to beat Denver in postseason?
    
    Pittsburgh in the playoffs following the '84 season.  That was Denver's
    only playoff loss at home.
    
    
    Joe
36.682Not too difficult to figure this one out...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 07 1992 18:0228
    
    > The Broncos must be rated in the top two for 3 of the last six since
    > they went to the Superbowl.  If this is not fact then the whole playoff
    > scene is a big scam.
    
    Congrats on finally figuring this out!  The Broncos (actually the
    entire AFC with a couple exceptions) have been scamming lovers of 
    championship-caliber football for years! 
    
    > Wake up Pal...  The
    > Donks are at the top and their consistent return to the championship
    > games proves that.
      
    Where have you been the last decade, Big Game?  The NFC has
    consistently dominated the AFC in regular season play and in the Super
    Bowl.  Making the Super Bowl does not necessarily make you the second
    best team in football.  If the Broncos had been in the NFC and never
    made the Super Bowl due to the competitive imbalance and the Browns had 
    continually taken their place in the AFC, would you be crowing that the
    Browns are better than the Broncos?  Of course they wouldn't be...
    
    The fact of the matter is that the NFC championship game has been a
    closer game than each of the three last Bronco Super Bowl
    appearances, and the NFC runner-up has arguably been a better team than
    the Broncos in each of those years...
    
    glenn
    
36.684COBRA::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Tue Jan 07 1992 18:166
    
        
         Yup Waugaman's on the money again. I didn't vote in the 
        NoTY contest because I thought the whole idea silly but if 
        I had I would have voted for G_Waugaman. 
    
36.685So then it's a bet, MorT?AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithTue Jan 07 1992 18:351
    
36.686ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYTammany,Daley,Stalin,FarleyTue Jan 07 1992 18:393
    If you wanna negotiate with me buddy then do so in private.
    
    MrT
36.687AXIS::ROBICHAUDChrisDishman,JackDelRio,MorTTue Jan 07 1992 18:471
    
36.688CSC32::J_HERNANDEZThe dirtiest player in the gameTue Jan 07 1992 19:442
    YO /er I'll bet you a sixer of any beer you want. Donk fans are skeert,
    but I ain't. 
36.689COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 07 1992 20:022
      Quit DD,  your hexin' the donks.   What,  do you Joe & Jeff have a
    little side bet goin' on up there on the hill?
36.690You Guys Slay Me With Your Anti-Donk B.S. Wake Up !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Jan 07 1992 20:4835
    Glenn & Co.
    
     It has become painfully obviously to me that you boys aren't about
    to give the Donks or any other AFC team credit for playing great
    football.  The Donks/Bills have proven over the past several years
    that they can and are able to compete with the so called "Gawds of 
    the NFC"  
    
     I've been right here the past decade, Glenn.  And yes, you are correct
    when you say the the NFC has dominated the AFC in superbowls over those
    years.  But,  For you to say that the runner up in the NFC was a better
    team and would have won is pure conjecture on your part.  You have no
    facts to back up what you say.  The Broncos and Bills are great teams
    and can compete with any NFC teams.  The fact of the matter is that the
    Broncos and bills are at the top of the NFL right up ther with a few 
    teams from the NFC.  let me see if I can name a few Stiffs in the NFC
    for ya;
    
    	Tampa, Rams, Cardinals, Greenbay, Vikes, Bears
    
    HTH
    
     When the Time comes (Jan 27th) I can't wait to shove a whole bunch
    on you.
    
     There is no way that the Rams would have beaten the Donks.  
    
     Tim,  isn't it nice to see the activity in this file.  Unlike some
    other teams, the Donks are still in it.  Most if not all of the
    Anti-Donks are fan of those teams which have already sat down for the
    year.  To bad they can't root for their teams.
    
     
    
    Big Game
36.691HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesWed Jan 08 1992 10:209
>    football.  The Donks/Bills have proven over the past several years
>    that they can and are able to compete with the so called "Gawds of 
>    the NFC"  
    
     You're half right Big n' Gamey. The Bills have played well against the
    NFC in the Bowl and may even have a shot at a win this year. The Donks
    on the other hand... Which NFC teams ahve they beaten the last few
    years that were playoff teams the year they played?
                                      Denny  
36.692One from the old days...CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Wed Jan 08 1992 10:4014
What I wanna know is...Where's Jill?????? 8^))))

Sorry Big Lame you just don't cut it! Your trite diatribes on how
great the Donko's are, to say the least are boorish. Now Jill on the
other hand would have handed Glenn(1 n or 2?) his ever lovin head!!
Shame on you. BTW the Bills WILL crush the Donkey's sunday, they have
NO chance and no clue. The ONLY reason the Burro's make it to the 
playoffs is because of the altitiude factor, take em' away from Pile
High and kiss the Donks goodbye!



Steve
36.693What exactly is so bad about #5? Inferiority complex at work?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 08 1992 11:1523
    
    Sorry, Big Game, but you've got it all wrong.  I *have* given the
    Broncos their due.  I've rated them #5 in the NFL in the Elway era.
    That's pretty darn good if you ask me.  I didn't put the Rams ahead of
    them (although they might have been better that *one* year, the year of
    the Broncos' worst-ever Super Bowl performance-- and in truth the
    Giants were really the better team that season anyway but lost to the
    Rams in a tough divisional playoff game).  By no coincidence, all of 
    the teams I rated ahead of the Broncos had to come out on top in the 
    tough NFC and *all* won Super Bowls.  Is that really so outrageous?
    
    Also, I wouldn't mind in the least if the AFC finally breaks through
    this year.  I wouldn't mind if it was the Broncos that did it, either 
    (but don't go taking credit for the Broncos if it's the Bills who 
    actually do it).
    
    Methinks you perceive any honest analysis as some kind of personal
    vendetta against the Broncos.  No, we're talking O-B-J-E-C-T-I-V-I-T-Y
    here.  Calling them as I see them.  I know I shouldn't bring that kind
    of thing into the Bronco note, so I apologize.
    
    glenn
    
36.694did you model for Jeff's cartoon?CNTROL::CHILDSIs it a question of Love? hahaaaaaWed Jan 08 1992 11:359
 Jack, buddy you better go down to Health Services and get your blood pressure
 check. I'm sincerely worried about your state of health at this moment....

 repeat after me "it's only a game it's only a game..."

 ;^)

 mike
36.695So, when does the Colts' season start ?LUNER::BROOKSThe People's NoTY 1991 : DrMWed Jan 08 1992 12:2346
    There is no place like home ... There is no place like home ... There is no place like home ...
    There is no place like home ... There is no place like home ...
    
    There now .... :-(
    
    What can I say ? I'm in Houston watching the game, and in the 1st
    quarter, and part of the second it looks like the AFC title game. Moon
    was smoking the ball as the Donks foolishly tried to blitz him
    (jefferies caught a 50 yarder on the first play of the game), then when
    the played off, White ran strongly.
    
    But there was a BIG danger sign early, IMO :
    
    - Houston's defense never got in a consistent groove as Sewell and
    Green ran for solid yardage all day.
                                                
    Despite that, I thought it would be an Oiler win, but with all due
    respect to Mr Ed ...
    
    The Oilers gave this game away.
    
    - Two drops by Jefferies, one at the 5 (which would have been 1st and
    goal), and the other in the end zone.
    
    - A missed chip shot FG.
    
    - Mike Munchak's 4 penalities, 2 in the last drive.
    
    - Poor coaching decisions - the worst of all being the awful TO taken
    on 4th and 10.
    
    Elway had thrown three straight incompletions, was dazed and winded,
    and what does Pardee do ?
    
    Allow the buck-toothed rascal time to regroup and talk things over.
    
    How STUPID can you be ?
    
    BTW, I didn't see any undue trash-talking. Elway was doing just as much
    as Givens, but this is the Denver note ....
    
    Anyhow, good luck to the DOnks, but I don't see them coming within 10
    points of Buffalo, if the Bills come to play like they did Sunday.
    Houston did as much to lose that $!%@&*!( game as Denver did to win it.
    
    Doc
36.696ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYTammany,Daley,Knorr,KevinFarleyWed Jan 08 1992 12:306
    >Houston did as much to lose that game as Denver did to win it.
    
    Midnight, I been wondering.  You related to Chris Dishman by any
    chance?
    
    MrT
36.697Not total NFC domination!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOHomey don't play dat!Wed Jan 08 1992 12:4218
    I have to agree with Glenn and the others, for the most part, on what's
    been said about NFC domination during the 80's. Big Game is blinded
    by the Donks and there's no sense even trying to get thru. :-)
    There are three teams (a good case can be made for a couple others) 
    however, that seem to buck the NFC domination theory, and they are the
    same three teams that led the way in the 70's AFC domination, namely:
    the Steelers, Raiders, and Dolphins. While only the Raiders won the
    Superbowl (twice) in the 80's, all three clubs continued (for the most
    part) to win against NFC rivals. As far as this year goes, if the Donks
    don't miraculously luck out and get past the Bills, then there should
    be no 'domination' from either conference. In other words it could go
    either way. Here's something to consider, if the Bills were to make it
    to the Superbowl (whats the chances of that happening..:-) and they
    totally ripped apart either the Redskins or Lions, should we then
    consider this season as AFC dominated?
    
    Carlos
     
36.698CTHQ1::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeWed Jan 08 1992 12:497
    Doc,
    Didn't see Elway talking trash, but certainly saw Givens. All Givens
    had to do is look 5 yards to his left and observe the classy Moon.
    Now there's a professional.
    
    MikeL
    
36.699QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 13:0217
    
     Glenn...
    
     I know that you rated the Donks in the Top 5.  The thing that gets me 
    is that you and others rate the Donks based solely on their Stupidbowl
    appearances which IMHEO (In My Honest Exalted Opinion) is not a fair
    and objective way to grade a club.  I guess I'll let this lie for now
    and pick it up next week when the Donks are preparing for the Lions
    in Minny.  ;^)
    
     Carlos,  What are you, NUTS !!  The Fish haven't done a damn thing
    in the `80's...  Yea,  one SB, Big deal...  And the Faiders,  Well,
    they didn't even make it past the the so call "Weak AFC" lasted(tm)
    year.  I do believe that the Bill's Blew them out so bad they didn't
    even have to catch a plane home.  This won't happen to the Donks.
    
    BG
36.700CARROL::LEFEBVREPojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPiecesWed Jan 08 1992 13:421
    .x00
36.701MONGUS::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Wed Jan 08 1992 13:564
    
     re .700
    
     You lead a full life there, Lefebvre.
36.702Donks are a fake!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOLove the Lord, thy God.Wed Jan 08 1992 13:5811
    >> Carlos, what are you NUTS!!
    
    Yeah.....So..?
    
    My point was not the these three clubs dominated the league in the
    80's, but, that they weren't dominated by the NFC clubs....get it!
    
    By the way, I hope you'll be so bold about eating all that crow come
    Monday...
    
    Carlos
36.703GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Wed Jan 08 1992 13:592
    
    WTFC?  :^)
36.704BSS::JCOTANCHHow'd the Faiders to this weekend?Wed Jan 08 1992 14:0226
    
>     I know that you rated the Donks in the Top 5.  The thing that gets me 
>    is that you and others rate the Donks based solely on their Stupidbowl
>    appearances which IMHEO (In My Honest Exalted Opinion) is not a fair
>    and objective way to grade a club.  

    BG, sounds like you're contradicting yourself.  Since Glenn put Denver
    in his top 5 over the past 5-10 years, it's obvious he didn't base
    that solely on Super Bowl performances.  I mean, here's a team that
    hasn't taken home the big trophy but they're still classified by Glenn
    to be in the league's top 18%.  And that sounds even more generous when
    you consider they didn't even reach the AFC title game in Elway's first
    3 seasons and have missed the playoffs in 3 of Elway's nine seasons.
    
    Meanwhile, I do believe Denver has a game this Sunday.  Geez, 10:30
    kickoff for their biggest game of the season - guess I'll have to get
    up early. :^) 
    
    Looks like Kartz will be out but Henderson should play.  Mark Jackson has 
    been cleared to practice and he might even play Sunday.  That would be quite
    a comeback - he was thought to be out for the season even if Denver
    makes the SB.  Haven't heard anything about Young.  Also, Bruce Smith
    might not play and isn't talking to the press.
    
    
    Joe
36.705CARROL::LEFEBVREPojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPiecesWed Jan 08 1992 14:2210
          <<< Note 36.701 by MONGUS::BRYDIE "Howard Roark laughed." >>>

    
    
>     You lead a full life there, Lefebvre.
    
    What's your excuse?
    
    Mark.
    
36.706MONGUS::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Wed Jan 08 1992 14:253
    
     I forgot to add a [isfh] my apologies but those .xxoo notes are truly
     inspired.
36.707CARROL::LEFEBVREPojamaPeopleAreBoringMeToPiecesWed Jan 08 1992 14:265
    And the Donks diatribe is?
    
    Hal tried hard (tm)
    
    Mark.
36.708Chances are I'll be eating Tons of the dreaded Black Bird !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 14:2615
     Clay-wad...  What the heck is WTFC...  I think I got the first 3 words
    but the c is throwing me.
    
     Got ya Carlos...  I knew what you ment it was the way that you worded
    it that made me think you might be trying to say the "Commitment to 
    Excellence" boys had dominated the AFC along with the Fish.  Oh well.
    
     Also,  As anyone in this conference can tell you I never shy away
    from the crow that is mine to eat.  If the Donks lose (which BTW is
    better than a 75% chance) I will eat my crow.  If they win, I will be
    shoveling it as fast as I can to all the Anti-Donks !!
    
    I'm Not Skeerd
    
    BG
36.709thought of "cares"?CST17::FARLEYR.I.P. Grandma, say Hi to Mom &amp; Dad :*(Wed Jan 08 1992 14:311
    
36.710COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Jan 08 1992 14:3616
       I thought that the AFC & NFC were close in interconference games
    over the last 10 years,  with this year being a big exception.  Ninj, 
    do you have any of those stats? 
    
      I'm not sure that it matters that much since the NFC has won most of
    the SBs in the last 10-12 years with the only exception of the faids
    winning 2.
    
      Speaking of faids,  Flores is now the head man for seahawks.  That
    could be interesting.  If he picks up where he left off in LA,  then
    the seahawks will no different than they have the past 15 years.  If
    Tom does what he did in his 1st 4 years with the faids,  then Seattle
    could be a contender.
    
    
    	Tim
36.711Not with it today !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 14:436
    
     Boy,  I musta been in a time warp to miss that one...
    
    Thanks,
    
    BG
36.712FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jan 08 1992 14:546
    Not off-hand but I do have them at home.  The AFC has consistently won
    the inter-conference matchup with the NFC except for 3-4 years, and
    this year's margin of 33-19 by the NFC was the biggest ever for the NFC
    and probably is the biggest ever for either side.
    
    John
36.713Just say no to parity anyway....NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 08 1992 15:4615
    
    > this year's margin of 33-19 by the NFC was the biggest ever for the NFC
    > and probably is the biggest ever for either side.
    
    I think I read somewhere that there was a season in the late 70s where
    the AFC's advantage was actually even bigger than that...
    
    Pretty strange that you still have these periods of clear dominance 
    between conferences in football but no real apparent edge in baseball
    in the post-free agent era.  Free agency is probably the reason for
    that...
    
    glenn
    
    
36.714FSDEV::MGILBERTGHWB-Anywhere But America Tour 92Wed Jan 08 1992 16:0411
    
    First off I'm truly biased. I hate both the Donks and the Bills. With
    that said I predict a Buffalo victory. I can't see the OL of Denver
    keeping the Bills away from Elway for very long and I'm not convinced
    that Denver's secondary can handle the Bills receiver corps.
    
    Bills 30
    
    Broncos 14
    
    
36.715Broncos: These Are Classy Winners!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYTammany,Daley,Knorr,KevinFarleyWed Jan 08 1992 16:586
    Read where the Broncos lead the NFL in injuries this year.  And
    yet here they are scratching and clawing their way to the top a
    the hill, Iwo Jima-style.  Could this surprising feat be the result
    a John (Big Bad John) and his inspiring leadership?
    
    MrT
36.716USCTR2::NAHEARNWed Jan 08 1992 17:1427
    Could be due to the fact that the Broncos had one of the easier
    schedules in the League this year....helping them to finish with the
    2nd best won-lost record...allowing them a bye in the first round ofthe
    playoffs...and a 50-50 chance of reaching the AFC Championship game
    (which, as we're all painfully aware...they reached!!).
    
    I don't dislike the Broncos (although a handful of their fans are
    irritating as hell!!), but neither do I think they are a top quality
    team!!  I think Elway is excellent, Fletcher and Croel make for an
    excellent pair of OLB's, Mecklenberg is a throw-back, Green has had a
    great year...the offensive line has done well....and everything else is
    so-so.  I don't think the players singled out above (I forgot to
    compliment Kragen...a top-notch NT) are enough to take out the Bills
    (I'm not a Bills fan either...although I love watching them play) this
    time around!!  My guess is no better or worse than anyone else's (until
    proven right/wrong).....I figure the Broncos to get smoked by the
    Bills.  The Bills offense has more dimensions than the Oilers
    (running game, TE's...), who gave Denver all it could handle at home...
    
    
    Buffalo 34
    Denver  17
    
    Hal Tried Hard(TM),
    
    Nelly
    
36.717AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithWed Jan 08 1992 17:237
    	So MorT, we got a P-Name bet or do you need more than the alloted
    points?  If you were a main's main like Mike Childs, you would bet
    the game straight up, like he did wif' his Steelers, NO POINTS.
    But I guess that hair on your chest is turning to peach fuzz.
    
    				/Don
    
36.718I'm Not Skeered !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 17:359
    
    Slasher,
    
     I, The representation of a manly man have several bets placed even up
    on the Donks/Bills game.  I would be more than happy to take you up on
    a P-Name wager.  Send me mail and we'll discuss the terms and content
    of the above mentioned P-Names...
    
    BG
36.719AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithWed Jan 08 1992 17:395
    	I got no beef wif' any Bronco fans small, just one bandwagon
    jumper.  He's the only one I want to bet wif', if he's main enough
    that is...
    
    				/Don
36.720ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYTammany,Daley,Knorr,KevinFarleyWed Jan 08 1992 17:577
    Hey /Robitussin, I axed you to carry on all negoitations in private
    via mail.  You have violated my confidence in this and that raises
    questions about whether you'd welsh when it came payoff time.
    
    Homey don't play dat.
    
    MrT
36.721HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesWed Jan 08 1992 18:062
       Told ya Slasher, he's yella!
                                      denny
36.722But I do hope the Donks winGENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Wed Jan 08 1992 18:106
    
    Cacti,
    
    	You are confusing manliness with stooooopidity! :*)
    
    Claybroon
36.723B-caaawk. bbbb-cawwwwk...KEPNUT::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Wed Jan 08 1992 18:139
    
    I'd watch out for those "private negotiations" /er. Make sure
    you read the fine print and watch out for the double-talk.
    MrT...yer yella! Why not wager in a public forum? It seems
    simple enough, a trade of P-names! Too much fer you to swaller?
    What gives??
    
    
    Steve
36.724QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 18:135
    Naw,  ClayWad...  Just a loyal fan.
    
    Come on T...  Don't back down from the slasher...
    
    BG
36.726Ol' Yeller was Elway's favorite flick, tooNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 08 1992 18:215
    
    Keep it in here, Slash, or a "practical joke" is a-waitin for ya!
    
    glenn
    
36.727AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithWed Jan 08 1992 18:318
    	No way MorT, I want everyone to know exactly what the bet is
    so you cain't squeeze out of it like a greased pig at the County
    Fair.  I'll take the Bills -11 you got the Broncos.  If I win you
    carry the "Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,Dean" P-Name for a week, and
    if you win I'll carry the "Homer,Plato,Voltaire,BobKnight" P-Name
    for a week.  Simple ain't it?  It's your call.
    
    				/Don
36.728Yella!HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesWed Jan 08 1992 18:422
       Give 'im time Slash, he's desperately seeking a loophole!
                                         Denny
36.729MONGUS::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Wed Jan 08 1992 19:006
    
     Given Big Bad John's penchant for doing his 'Bambi vs. Godzilla' act
    whenever confronted with a tough D-fense in a big game, T's not going 
    to bet . 
    
    
36.730DECWET::METZGERT is yella...Wed Jan 08 1992 19:033
Just trying out the new p-name...

36.731Any True Donk Fan Would Jump At The Chance... You Not a vain are ya !QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 19:287
    Come on T...  You gonna let these bums talk about ya like that ???
    
    I don't know...  Maybe ya are Yella like they say...
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game Hunta
36.732RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Muddy Mudskipper SHowWed Jan 08 1992 19:4310
    Why take the bet.  /Don is one of the biggest vanes of all.  First his
    Dean Smith love-fest, and then his reknowned wagon jumping.  Heck, when
    I worked in the mill, the Slash had a different baseball cap on every
    day - with a different team's emblam emblazoned on it.  I distinctly
    remember him proudly showing off his Calgary Flames hat after they won
    the Cup - and this from a purported Broons fan.
    
    Don't be taken in by faux fans, T.
    
    JD
36.733CSC32::SALZERWed Jan 08 1992 21:399
    I was shocked when hearing that the Broncos were 11 point dogs in this
    one. The more I think about it though, that's probably about right. 
    Buffalo is good and they are at home. The Bills  better not loose this one.
    Despite their bad SB record, the record also shows us that Denver has the
    ability to win big games especially title games. The Broncos are going
    in there reasonably healthy and riding a wave of confidence. I like
    the upset.  
    
    BoB
36.734don't doit "T", *I* like yer P'name!!!!! ;^) ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYR.I.P. Grandma, say Hi to Mom &amp; Dad :*(Thu Jan 09 1992 00:041
    
36.735JD's memory has become clouded by all that fresh air...AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithThu Jan 09 1992 11:570
36.736GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Thu Jan 09 1992 12:4410
    
    	Did anybody catch HBO's "Inside the NFL" lasted (tm) night?
    
    	They were showing Dan Reeves giving out game balls in the 
    	locker room after beating Houston.  The camera was following
    	him around and in the background, there was a Bronco player
    	standing there buck nekkid.  We're talkin' full frontal show.
    	I was rollin'!
    
    	Claybroon
36.737A note I got From JaKeQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Jan 09 1992 12:4731
From:	CELTIK::JACOB         8-JAN-1992 17:40:19.97
To:	QUASER::HUNTER
CC:	JACOB
Subj:	RE: Man, You're rough !!

Hey, I try not to miss an opportunity to harrass someone.  You gave me a HUGE
opening and I went thru it like Barry Sanders.

I was ready to leave for my monthly poker game Saturday when the Donks got
the ball on the what, 2 or 3 yd line.  I said to my wife, who was rooting
for the pansy Oilscum, that Elway would get the team moved into at least FG
range and leave it up to Treadwell.  She took the opposite side.  Twas one
of the finest exhibitions of moving with your back up against a wall that
I've seen, short of the drive I in '86.  Loved it when the ball went thru
the uprights and the Oilscum was relegated to watching the playoffs henceforth.

Do have to admit I thought Treadwell was gonna miss it when the snap went astraybut Kubiak got it into place DAMNED fast, and Treadwell nailed it, unlike the 
hooked extra point that almost cost the Donks the game.  One helluva exciting
game, but halfway into the 2nd qtr I thought the Donks were toast.

IMHO, the Bills will beat the Donks but not by any HUGE margin.

Let's negotiate.  Lessee, if'n the Donks win, I could put up a P-name proclaim-
ing Mr. Ed to be the second coming, or GOD himself.  And run it for a few(3 or 4) days.  Whattya offereing if the Donks lose?????

Any points given either way??? If you're really confident, give me the Bills and6!  (8^)*

Lemme know

JaKe
    
36.738BSS::JCOTANCHHow'd the Faiders to this weekend?Thu Jan 09 1992 13:2455
If Denver is going to have a chance in Buffalo where the Bills usually play
at or near the top of their game and where the crowd will be very loud, 
there's a few need things they'll need to accomplish IMO (and in this order):

- Don't make it easy for the Bills by committing the big mistakes, and I'm
specifically speaking of turnovers and blocked punts/field goals.  Denver's
only blowout loss this season was forged by a blocked punt for a TD and 
turnovers, which made things very easy for Houston.  Even though the Oilers
scored 42 points, Denver's defense didn't play all that bad - Houston only
had 2 TD drives of more than 13 yards.  You just can't make it that easy for
your opponent when you're a big underdog on the road.

- Okay, no flurry of turnovers.  But the defense can't let the Bills walk 
down the field on every possession and put up 7 points quickly and easily.  
If Denver plays a turnover-free first half but lets the Bills score at will, 
it could still be a 3 or 4 TD deficit at the half.  Denver's defense will
need to keep them in the game because the offense is bound to sputter in 
a place like Rich Stadium.

- If the big play is there, they need to convert it.  If they're at the Buffalo
40-yard line and Elway puts a pass on the money down near the goal line the
receiver needs to make the catch, even if it's a tough one.  Could be the 
difference between 7 points and no points.  If they're in a 3rd-and-goal
situation they can't have a drop or a bad pass by John - could be the 
difference between 3 points and 7 points.  Denver will need to take advantage
of all their opportunities and will probably need every point they can get. 
If a DB has a pick in his arms, he needs to make the play, especially if it's 
one of those where he has nothing but open field in front of him.  We saw a KC 
defensive back drop an interception that would've gone for 6 just before the 
half, and that just may have give the Chiefs new life at halftime.  Dimry 
returned a pick for what proved to be the winning TD during Denver's biggest 
win of the regular season at KC.

- This last one might sound typical or generic, but I still feel it will be
an important ingredient if Denver is going to make a game of it: run the ball
well and control the tempo of the game.  Denver ran the ball very well in 
Minnesota and the game would've been over with about 6 or 7 minutes left if
Lewis hadn't fumbled down at the goal line.  Two years ago in Buffalo (outside
that horrid 77-second span, of course) was probably as well as I've ever seen
the Denver offensive line control the line of scrimmage.  Humphrey rushed for
in the neighborhood of 170 yards that day, and Denver *stopped* running the ball
after the debacle started. 


Bottom line is that Denver might not need to play an outstanding game but they
can't give the Bills easy scores and they need to take advantage of 
opportunities when they come along.

All this said, I say it'll come down to this: Denver will need to be within a 
touchdown of the Bills going into the 4th quarter.  Buffalo is too tough a 
place to play to need a couple scores late in the game.



Joe
36.739AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithThu Jan 09 1992 13:595
    	So MorT, is the problem that 11 points ain't enough for the
    studliest stud in football?  Do you need more points?  I'm a reasonable
    main.  Tell us what you need for a point spread.
    
    				/Don
36.740Yella!VLAB::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesThu Jan 09 1992 14:151
     
36.741GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Thu Jan 09 1992 14:364
    
    	This reminds me of Hoot and the Parrot. ;^)
    
    	Claybroon
36.742ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Thu Jan 09 1992 14:3912
    >B-caaawk. bbbb-cawwwk...
    
    Ok, /Robitussin, I'll take the bet at 11 points with me getting the
    push.  John (Big Bad John) is aching and bursting in the loinal area
    to fill that dangling "G" string near to bursting, so I don't need
    no extra points.  Besides, who stands more foursquare and loyal for
    his fave squads than poor MrT? [nobody]
    
    I accept the terms and conditions as defined in 36.723, and don't  
    you EVER publicly question my mainliness again buddy.
    
    MrT
36.743AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithThu Jan 09 1992 14:479
36.744MrT takes the bet! Push at 11!HBAHBA::HAASMental ModelThu Jan 09 1992 14:490
36.745ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Thu Jan 09 1992 14:538
    Sorry.  I mistakenly typed in .723 cuz I was replying while looking
    at that note cuz I was extracting the udderly disgusting chiken-
    talk attributed to me in that awful note.
    
    .727 it is.  I accept the wager under the terms and conditions set
    forth in 36.727 with me taking the push at 11.
    
    MrT
36.746got you now buddyANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Thu Jan 09 1992 14:546
    You better stash a six-pack a Family Size DM in your desk, 
    /Robitussin, cuz it's gonna be mighty rough noting all next
    week with "Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" over your once
    proud name.
    
    MrT
36.747USCTR2::NAHEARNThu Jan 09 1992 14:566
    JMHO, but, insisting on getting the 'push' is weak!!
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
36.748QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Jan 09 1992 15:088
    Why...
    
     The Slasher just wasn't quick enough or he'd a done the same.  I
    say congrats to T for being Sharp enough to jump on any advantage
    possible...  Only thing is he won't need the points...  Donks
    outright  24-21...
    
    BGH
36.749Bootlicker, BG 8^)CTHQ1::LEARYLook what they've done to my song,MawThu Jan 09 1992 15:111
    
36.750QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Jan 09 1992 15:246
    HEY !!!  I resemble that remark,  Mike !!  Lets keep it
    clean now boys & girls..
    
    ;^)
    
    BGH
36.751GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Thu Jan 09 1992 15:546
    
    	Of course, even if they have to wear a dispicable p-name,
    	there was no mention of the *volume* of notes they enter
    	during the week they wear it.  A meatless bet!
    
    	Claybroon
36.752NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 09 1992 15:579
    
    >	Of course, even if they have to wear a dispicable p-name,
    >	there was no mention of the *volume* of notes they enter
    >	during the week they wear it.  A meatless bet!
    
    It's worth it if we can get MrT to shaddup for a week...
    
    glenn
    
36.753GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Thu Jan 09 1992 16:086
    
    	Well, don't hold it against me if I get to enjoy everybody
    	who's been attacking poor MrT having to shaddap. :*)
    
    
    	Claybroon
36.754ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Thu Jan 09 1992 16:195
    Yeah, having to endure Peanut Gallery heckling from Denny and Metz
    was bad.  Then it turns out that they were wrong wrong WRONG and
    that poor MrT is far from "yella," he is one very ballsy fella !!
    
    MrT
36.755JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jan 09 1992 17:046
    >	This reminds me of Hoot and the Parrot. ;^)
    
    Nah, no one's said anything about "holding on every play" yet. ;-)
    
    
    py
36.756QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Jan 09 1992 17:254
    How true that used to be, Paul...  Hoot and the Parrot really
    were a pair !!
    
    BGH
36.757whateve happened to Hoot, such a nice Big10 boyANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Thu Jan 09 1992 18:571
    
36.758CNTROL::CHILDSIs it a question of Love? hahaaaaaThu Jan 09 1992 19:024
 A ballsy main woulda bet straight up on such mano-mano bet....

 MNSHO
36.759not when he's ballsy AND brainy buddyANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Thu Jan 09 1992 19:091
    
36.760GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Thu Jan 09 1992 19:159
    
    MrT,
    
    	Hoot took the 1st package.  I just saw him up at the main
    	building (he still has his DCU account).  He said to tell
    	all you folks hi and to thank you all who sent their
    	condolences for his brother's death.  
    
    Claybroon
36.761Where is HAL & the Groaner?COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterThu Jan 09 1992 19:4413
      Don't furget the Burgers and Buds...The Parrots favorite line!  He is
    now on the Green Mountain Falls town council deciding those important
    things,  like wheather someone can put in a dog run behind their house,
    etc..
    
      I agree with ya Joe.  Denver has to control the tempo mainly on
    defense.  Offense would be nice, but when has Denver done good in a
    "enemy" noisy stadium?  Thats why I don't thin they'll win,  even
    though I hope they do!!!!!
    
      Anyone wearin their orange tommorrow???  BG???
    
    	Tim
36.762Brainy yes, Yella yes, Ballsy NO!!CNTROL::CHILDSIs it a question of Love? hahaaaaaThu Jan 09 1992 20:041
36.763QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Jan 09 1992 20:086
    Gonna wear the Offical Elway Lucky Jersy tomorrow, Tj...  How
    about you !!??
    
    Big Game Hunta 
    
    
36.764CSC32::SALZERThu Jan 09 1992 20:1218
    Denver is very capable in loud foreign teritory. I cant remember how 
    far back but the Broncos had to go to Seattle about the last game
    of the year. It was to decide the AFC championship. They practiced
    for a week with blaring loud speakers and ear plugs. As it turned
    out it was a surprisingly silent crowd when the Broncos jumped them
    early and stayed on top. The top items to silence crowds are 
    in no particular order and in any combination..... 
    
    1. make first downs
    2. score points
    3. force turnovers
    4. don't let them make 1st downs
    5. don't let them score points
    6. don't turn the ball over
    
    Pretty easy eh?
    
    BoB
36.765Silence is goldenCSC32::SALZERThu Jan 09 1992 20:154
    Correction. It was to decide the AFC west title. Cleveland can
    testify to stunning silence also.
    
    BoB
36.766how many broncos does it take......WR1FOR::SHERRILROThu Jan 09 1992 20:2411
    
     First of all let me say one thing....I HATE THE DOINKS. But I hope 
    they beat the Bills. And you all ask me "Ron why do you want the 
    donkeys to win if you hate them???" The anwser is...............
    
    I need a few good laffs , last time they were in the SB and S.F. beat
    the &(^@$#%# out of them there were some good donkey jokes floating
    around.
    
    Ron
       
36.767GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Thu Jan 09 1992 20:375
    
    	Yeah, well get your hiney over to the intro note so everybody
    	will know who your fave teams are.  Fair play and all that....
    
    	Claybroon
36.768Denver 31, Seattle 14BSS::JCOTANCHJohn (Big Bad John)Thu Jan 09 1992 20:4715
>    Denver is very capable in loud foreign teritory. I cant remember how 
>    far back but the Broncos had to go to Seattle about the last game
>    of the year. 

    Yes, Bob, I remember that one well.  You have already corrected
    yourself in saying that it was for the AFC West title.  It was the last
    game of the '84 season and the winner won the division with the loser
    forced to play in the wild card game the following week.  It was without 
    a doubt Denver's most impressive road win in the Reeves era considering 
    what was at stake.  All week long the Seahawks and the people of Seattle 
    were mailing this one in.

    
    Joe 
    
36.769I hate "the drive" "the fumble"WR1FOR::SHERRILROThu Jan 09 1992 20:566
    
    re: -2
    
    Uh....Gulp...well o.k. My intro is there. 
    
    Ron
36.770WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Fri Jan 10 1992 06:597
    The Broncos had better hope they lose or Washington will embarrass them.

    The Bills will win but the Bronc's will cover the spread. It should be
    an entertaining game to watch.

                                                   Night Flier  ~~v~~
36.771VLAB::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesFri Jan 10 1992 10:163
    re:   Monty on the Town Council deciding on dog runs.
       Sure hope nobody has a collie!
                                      Denny
36.772QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSFri Jan 10 1992 12:315
    
     The Bum was running for Mayor last I heard.  I just can't see
    the Parrot as Mayor...  Not even of GMF !!
    
    Big Game Hunta
36.773FRETZ::HEISERgames of chance and circumstanceFri Jan 10 1992 13:474
    Re: Big Bad John
    
    Is that like "I have to go to the John!" or "James Worthy is king of
    the low-post-spin-movin' Johns!"?
36.774Go Broncos. Rah Rah RAH.ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Fri Jan 10 1992 14:2212
    John (Big Bad John) and the dangling "G" string he hopes to fill
    to bursting has nothing to do with James UnWorthy's afternoon
    snack on a white bread sandwich.
    
    Hey Big Game, are you as excited as I am about the Big Matchup?
    
    John (Big Bad John) and Kelly will be the 2nd monster QB matchup
    in a row for John (Big Bad John).  No matter who wins the QB 
    matchup in the SB is gonna be a major letdown in comparison to 
    those of the Moon/Kelly haid-to-haids with John (Big Bad John) !!
    
    MrT
36.776Hope they win it early !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSFri Jan 10 1992 14:546
    Yea, T...  I'm fired up to see the game.  May only get to see bits
    and peices though.  The memorial service for Hoots brother is at
    12:00 noon on Sunday in GMF and thats much more important than any
    football game, even the Donks.  
    
    Big Game Junta 
36.777CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 10 1992 15:168
36.778QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSFri Jan 10 1992 15:306
    
     Not at all...  Hoot & The Parrot are putting this together.
    I'm sure that they scheduled it during the Broncos game on purpose
    just so the we Bronco fans would have to miss the game. ;^)
    
    
36.779CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 10 1992 15:482
    Silly me, how could I forget that Hoot wasn't one of the brainwashed
    Colorado orange masses ;^)
36.780CSC32::SALZERFri Jan 10 1992 16:439
    The Bills are saying and doing all the right things. They don't want
    tp antagonize or throw fuel on any fires.  However I still think 
    they, like all the experts, see this as just a formality needed
    to be played to get to the bowl. Mark Jackson will play. Kartz is
    probable but questionable is more like it. 11 points still sounds
    good. 
    
    BoB  
    
36.781CNTROL::CHILDSWill Vince and Teddy say NO to Magic?Fri Jan 10 1992 16:4713
>    The Bills are saying and doing all the right things. They don't want
>    tp antagonize or throw fuel on any fires.  However I still think 
>    they, like all the experts, see this as just a formality needed
>    to be played to get to the bowl. Mark Jackson will play. Kartz is
>    probable but questionable is more like it. 11 points still sounds
>    good. 
    
 
 11 isn't enough Bills by 30....  42-10

 H&R    

36.782ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Fri Jan 10 1992 17:047
    Hey /Robitussin, the line's gone up to *twelve* buddy.  Do you give
    me 12, avec le pousse, now?  Do you have justice in those once proud
    frontal lobes of yours?
    
    RSVP.
    
    Poor MrT
36.783AXIS::ROBICHAUDDrM - Faux NOTYFri Jan 10 1992 17:306
    	Okay MorT if you think one point will make that much a difference
    you cain have it.  But this is the only thing I'm renegotiating,
    all the other terms of our bet still apply.  And *don't* try to
    weasel out of it!
    
    				/Don
36.784BSS::JCOTANCHJohn (Big Bad John)Fri Jan 10 1992 17:428
 
>  11 isn't enough Bills by 30....  42-10

    Still wouldn't be as embarrassing as 51-3!
    
    
    Joe

36.785don't worry, /Robey, you're dealing with MrT hereANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Fri Jan 10 1992 17:457
    >And *don't* try to weasel out of it!
    
    Why, I'm hurt that you would even say such a thing, /Robitussin.
    We Broncos fans are widely acclaimed as the BEST sports fans in
    the world, and tip-top in the integrity department too.
    
    MrT
36.786Way to be a main about it, Slasher...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 10 1992 17:461
    
36.787LUNER::BROOKSCan you say 'triangulated crossfire'?Fri Jan 10 1992 17:464
    re .783
    
    Gawd, I hope the Bills don't win this one 24-6, and have Elway throw a
    garbage TD on the last play of regulation ....
36.788Yeah, I'm hoping this happens...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 10 1992 17:5311
    
    > Gawd, I hope the Bills don't win this one 24-6, and have Elway throw a
    > garbage TD on the last play of regulation ....
    
    I wouldn't mind.  Although I'd like to see the p-string, it'd probably
    be more fun to see MrT take that twelfth point and turn it into a 
    "second half surge by Big Bad John to finally burst through the bulging
    G-string".
    
    glenn
    
36.789VLAB::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesFri Jan 10 1992 18:403
       Very Manly there /Don. Actually though, you only had to give him a
    xtra 1/2 point. He already had 11 1/2 because a his weasly 'push'.
                                            Denny
36.790Ya gotta give something to get something Denny...AXIS::ROBICHAUDDrM - Faux NOTYFri Jan 10 1992 18:421
    
36.791exQUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSFri Jan 10 1992 18:4211
    Well, Well, Well,
    
     It's come down to the last day of noting before the "Big Game"
    is played in Luckaolo.  I predict an offensive explosion by 
    the Donks fueled by the return of Mark Jackson.  The Denver 
    defense will play their best game of the year holding Thomas
    to less that 60 yards and Kelly to under 200 passing.  The 
    Bills will have 2 turn overs both of which will be converted by
    Denver into points.  Look for a big Denver win !!
    
    Big Game
36.792ol' /Robey simply avoided a spectacle is allANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Fri Jan 10 1992 18:528
    Yeah, Denny, but now I have 12 1/2.  Call me a_animal abuser for
    taking a Hairy Smithna downtown on a numbers deal, fine.  Go right
    ahaid and give the ASPCA a jingle and turn me in.  But don't call
    /Robitussin mainly for ceding me this point.  He knows that if he'd
    refused I woulda bitched-slapped and dog-walked his ace up and down
    the street in front a you all, barking like a dog the whole way.
    
    MrT
36.793AXIS::ROBICHAUDDrM - Faux NOTYFri Jan 10 1992 18:568
================================================================================
Note 36.792                       Bronco notes                        792 of 792
ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,Dean"  8 lines  10-JAN-1992 16:52

	I think you'll wear this well next week MorT.  The only slappin' 
you do cain't be discussed in this notesfile.

				/Don
36.794 ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYUnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElwayFri Jan 10 1992 19:021
    
36.795PTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementFri Jan 10 1992 19:2210
    
   >><<< Note 36.794 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "UnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElway" >>>
    
    
    Hey "T"winkle"T"oes,
    
    Ye forgot Bradshaw in there!!!
    
    JaKe
    
36.796CSC32::SALZERFri Jan 10 1992 22:235
    If Elway can successfully take advantage of a questionable Bills
    defense and the Denver defense has even a good day, the Broncos win
    24-21. 
    
    BoB
36.797AXIS::ROBICHAUDHOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknightMon Jan 13 1992 09:244
    	Last week it was the "Drive II".  This week is was "The Fumble
    II"
    
    				/Don
36.798Donks go downESKIMO::WHITEHAIRMon Jan 13 1992 09:407
    
    	Only fitting that Eitherway looses the game for them.  HeHeHe...
    
    		I guess there is next year????
    
    	Dirty Dawg
    
36.799Broncos performed heriocally in defeat...ARWEN::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 13 1992 11:1511
   > <<< Note 36.794 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "UnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElway" >>>
                                                                      ^^^^^
    
    Good one, MrT.  I was very impressed by the Broncos; I didn't think
    their defense was capable of playing that well.  Thank goodness for the
    Bills that Elway was there to commit the decisive, colossal blunder of
    the game.  Maybe Gary Kubiak should re-consider his retirement...
    
    glenn
    
36.800Crow served cold pleaseOURGNG::RIGGENFree Ivan the terribleMon Jan 13 1992 11:445
Well I know how Houston felt last week...


Denver kicked butt all game and the Buffalo Bills will be stomped in the Bowl
Like a Husker team.
36.801CNTROL::CHILDSDean &amp; BBJ two of a kindMon Jan 13 1992 11:467
 Take Heart Jack it was for the best...you'd have never lasted the two weeks
 to the bowl....

 here's to another deflated "G" string....

 mike
36.802Respect is little consolationBSS::JCOTANCHMon Jan 13 1992 11:5855
For possibly the first time in their history the Denver Broncos lost a post-
season game but gained plenty of respect from many people around the country, 
but it's little consolation when you're not the one going to Minneapolis.  
They also managed to make an ass out of a particular Buffalo writer whose 
article ran in a Buffalo paper yesterday. (I'll try to type it in some time 
today - at least he can get embarrassed in here).

The many missed chances, tremendous play by the defense, and the near-miracle 
at the end just makes this one all the tougher to handle.  I wasn't too upset at
halftime despite all the missed chances.  If someone said before the game that 
at the half it would be tied, I would've taken it in a flash.  The Broncos 
were right where they wanted to be.  But the interception for a quick 7 points
was the number-one thing they couldn't do IMO, but did.  That appeared to be
the killer, because this was the type of game where one score can give you 
all the cushion you need and it woke up a crowd that had expected a blowout
from the opening kickoff.  And when Buffalo went up 10-zip, I *did* give up.
I figured they might go down and score, but I also figured there would only be
about 30 seconds left and they would still have the improbability of recovering
an onside kick.  But when Atwater recovered that kick, I ran back into the 
living room and thought, as most Bronco fans probably did, "It's gonna be
another miracle."  Except this one would've made last week's comeback look
like Denver came back from a 3-0 deficit in the first quarter.  This one 
would've ranked up there and possibly above of The Immaculate Reception, 
Dallas' victory over the Vikings in the mid-70's, and The Drive in the '86 
AFC Championship game.   

Back to reality.  Denver's defense played the best game in Bronco playoff 
history - let's leave it at that.  The offense did as good a job as I've ever 
seen them do with the screen pass, but that also turned out to be the killer 
play.  On the interception, it was a combination of two things: a good play by 
Bills NT Wright, who saw the play developing and stopped rushing Elway and 
backed up.  But even so, Elway just threw the ball too low - the screen pass
certainly isn't one of his strong points and he's had them picked off before.

Denver may have outplayed and outgained the Bills, but it doesn't matter 
because the Buffalo won the game.  One of the few things the NFL has 
going for it over college football IMO is that a win is a win, no matter how
you got, what the margin of victory was, or how ugly it was.  Buffalo won't 
drop in the polls for being unimpressive - the Bills go to Minneapolis while
Denver's season comes to an abrupt end.  

So Denver and Detroit, who met way back in July, won't meet again in the Super
Bowl.  Imagine what someone would've thought if you would've suggested back 
then that these 2 might have a rematch in the Super Bowl???  Well, it came much
closer to happening than anyone probably could've imagined.  

Look for next year's Denver-Buffalo or Denver-Washington game to be a Monday 
nighter.



Joe



36.803Elway gets Bailey-slapped ! Film at 11 ....LUNER::BROOKSCan you say 'triangulated crossfire'?Mon Jan 13 1992 12:111
    
36.804RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGrapefruits,Golf, and GirlsMon Jan 13 1992 12:1427
    Well,
    
    Denver outplayed Buffalo yesterday - but the ghost of Rick Karlis came
    up and blocked any chance they had.   To me, it seems that if you stop
    Buffalo's offense a few times early - they get jittery and nervous and
    have all types of problems.  As suggested last year during the Super
    Bowl, and yesterday by Walsh - there are times when they should abandon
    the no-huddle and run a 'tradional' offense.  Yesterday was a case in
    point.  It wasn't working and they kep running the same plays over and
    over and over.  And they weren't working.  Denver's defense played a
    great game.  Use the big safeties to smack everyone around.  Lofton was
    invisible after a few hits.
    
    Denver blew it big time.  The missed field goals hurt - but Elway was
    off when he was in there.  The Broncos should have chucked quick outs
    to the receivers and quick over patterns to Kay.  Buffalo's secondary
    isn't that good.  Leonard Smith hits hard - but he's more talk and show
    than talent.  
    
    I had said that either Wash or Buff wouldn't make the Bowl.  I was
    wrong.  I really felt Buffalo wouldn't make it to the show - and
    yesterday was the reason why.  But Denver gagged when it counted.
    
    That onsides was a thing of beauty - only to be ruined seconds later by
    Sewell's fumble.
    
    JD
36.805TORREY::MAY_BRPick, BAD JohnMon Jan 13 1992 12:452
    
    And a sigh of relief is heard throughout the Mile High City...
36.806GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Mon Jan 13 1992 12:5016
    
    	Kudos to Denver's D.  You guys have seen how it usually went
    	for the donks this year.  Steady D.  I can't think of any game
    	this year where the D let them down.
    
    	This game was theirs.  The O choked.  They didn't take advantage
    	of the numerous opportunities they had in Buffalo territory and
    	it killed them.  Of course, hats off to Buffalo's D for this (and
    	David Effin Treadwell!).
    
    	I'd hate to see Sewell catch any flack about his fumble.  He pulled
    	Denver's butt out of many a fire this year with his play.
    
    	Leonard "I wanna be in pictures" Smith is a hot dog el grande'.
    
    	Claybroon
36.807BSS::G_MCINTOSHWe have always been among you!Mon Jan 13 1992 12:535
    Well the Bills didn't beat the Broncos.  Clearly the Broncos beat the
    Broncos with too many missed opportunities in the 1st half, the attack
    of the GoalPosts and a horrendous interception.  Broncos did well.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.808TORREY::MAY_BRPick, BAD JohnMon Jan 13 1992 13:032
    
    Anyone else have visions of Rich Karlis??
36.809I don't think soCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 13 1992 13:121
    Anybody know a bookie like /Don that gives a floating line?
36.810wretched pukeFRETZ::HEISERback to Shalla-BalMon Jan 13 1992 13:371
    How about that "Bid Bad John"?
36.811LUNER::BROOKSCan you say 'triangulated crossfire'?Mon Jan 13 1992 14:007
    Small Lame,
    
    Got a trade for ya .... Treadwell for Del Greco. Straight up.
    
    Whadda say ?
    
    Doc
36.812LUNER::BROOKSCan you say 'triangulated crossfire'?Mon Jan 13 1992 14:011
    Shall we start a MrT watch ?
36.813TORREY::MAY_BRPick, BAD JohnMon Jan 13 1992 14:075
    
    Leave T alone.  He's got a terrible dilemma.  Wants terribly to get
    into the Dean note, but knows he's got to come here, also and talk
    about John, Pick, Bad John.  It'll be fun seeing his excuse for only
    being able to get into the Dean note.
36.814QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Mon Jan 13 1992 16:2422
    
     Like I said in the AFC Playoffs note...  Great Game.
    To lay the blame for a Bronco loss on any one person on
    the team is simply not right.  The Elway Int. wasn't the 
    sole reason they lost.  The Treadwell misses wasn't the
    sole reason they lost.  The Sewell Fumble wasn't the reason
    they lost and the Conservitive play calling in the red 
    zone wasn't the sole reason they lost.  The Broncos lost
    because of a combbination of all of these things.  If Treadwell
    makes one field goal the thing hits OT.  If Elway doesn't throw
    the INT it still 0-0 if Sewell holds on maybe they get another
    score.  If revees calls smarter plays in the red zone maybe it's
    a blow out.  Who really know what might have been.  the facts are 
    that Denver wasn't good enough when it counted to make it back
    to the SB.  I say,  Great Season...  Hope the Bill's don't get crushed
    by the `Skins.  Denvers Defense was great !!!
    
    Big Game
    
    Give me my Crow now please, it's lunch time !
    
    Big Game Hunta
36.815Big-Bad-WHO ????ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jan 13 1992 16:2714
    Well, looks like the Elway we all know and love showed up this weekend.
    You know, as a Raider fan I'm always getting grief from the Donk
    faithful about Schroeder choking in the big games, but it seems to me
    that they've got their own version of Schroeder up in Pile-it-high....
    ...As long as the doinks have Elway they'll never get a ring, and the
    thing about bursting g-strings....forget it! The only part of Elway's
    anatomy that resembles a horse is still his face. As per usual, when
    Elway pulls a choke, he feigned an injury to try and save face...loser!
    The donk defense had a good game...or did the Bills offense just have a
    bad one? hmmmm?.....Oh well, the doinks lasted one game past the faids,
    and like the faids they'll be watching the Superbowl from their
    lazy-boyz...
    
    Carlos
36.816CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 13 1992 16:364
36.817I almost wished Kubiak pulled it offCNTROL::CHILDSDean &amp; BBJ two of a kindMon Jan 13 1992 16:4514
36.818QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Mon Jan 13 1992 16:459
    
     Carlos...  Give it a rest...  Elway is ten times the QB that Jay
    will ever be.  John will be in the HOF..  Jay shouldn't even think
    about it.
    
     John was calling his plays for awhile.  If you noticed during this
    game,  Most if not all of the plays came in from the sidelines.
    
    Big Game Hunta 
36.819ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jan 13 1992 17:0211
    Big Game, my point wasn't that Schroeder is a better QB than Elfwad,
    Lord knows I don't think that, just that lasted week you guys thought
    she was the greatest QB to walk the planet, and I was just trying to
    help reality set in....he's good but he's not great, a great QB wins
    the 'Big Game' and Elway just doesn't know how to do this.  He might
    make it into the HoF, but it'll likely be because of his personality
    and off field accomplishments (he's a media darling you know) that get
    him there. JMHO! Speaking of HoF material, I think uncle Al, and Ray
    Guy will make it this year. 
    
    Carlos
36.820It certainly wasn't 51-3 now, was it?BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jan 13 1992 17:1427
>    You know, as a Raider fan I'm always getting grief from the Donk
>    faithful about Schroeder choking in the big games, but it seems to me
>    that they've got their own version of Schroeder up in Pile-it-high....

    Once in a while quarterbacks have off days, and yes, Elway had one
    yesterday.  At least his team *gets* to the big games - Schroeder's
    been to ONE AFC title game.  BTW, how'd Kelly do yesterday?
    
>    As per usual, when
>    Elway pulls a choke, he feigned an injury to try and save face...loser!

    Juvenile comment.
    
>    the doinks lasted one game past the faids,
>    and like the faids they'll be watching the Superbowl from their
>    lazy-boyz...
    
    Let me help you with your math a little here.  It was TWO games past
    the Faids.
    
    We don't appreciate you coming in here making these ridiculous comments
    just because your mighty Pride and Poise boys closed out the season with 
    four straight losses!
    
    
    Joe                                                           
                         
36.821Uncle Al Will Buy His Way Into HOF ~/~QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Mon Jan 13 1992 17:149
    Saying Elway can't win the big games is really out there Carlos.
    John has led his team into 3 SB's which means he has won 3 AFC 
    championship game which you have stated are big games.  John is
    a great QB.  His Int was not the only reason the Broncos lost.
    I really don't want to get into this kind of crap.  the Broncos had a
    great season,  they lost to the Bills Fair & Square.  Now,  Lets
    hope the Bills can win the Big one for the AFC !
    
    Big Game
36.822PTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementMon Jan 13 1992 17:4918
    
   >> If Treadwell
   >> makes one field goal the thing hits OT.  If Elway doesn't throw
   >> the INT it still 0-0 if Sewell holds on maybe they get another
   >> score.  If revees calls smarter plays in the red zone maybe it's
   >> a blow out.
    
    
    Little'n'Lame, 
    
    If, If, If!!!!!
    
    If your uncle had t*ts you'd call him Aunt!!!!!   (8^)*
    
    Good P-Name, Mr. Hunted
    
    JaKe
    
36.823Elway's career ain't over yet!COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Jan 13 1992 17:5812
      I did notice some new p-names in here today.  What happened BG?  Did
    you lose to Jake or Mike?
    
      BG & Joe,  just remember your dealing with Carlos (faids fan) when
    defending the donks.  The Broncos lost by 3,  nothin to be ashamed of.
    
      Stating Elway faked his injury and is a loser is lame.  If I heard
    correctly yesterday,  Elway has the highest winning % since 83.  If
    this is incorrect, then so was the TV or radio jock that I heard it
    from.  
    
        Tim
36.824Elway has most wins partly because he plays most gamesNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 13 1992 18:2519
    > If I heard
    > correctly yesterday,  Elway has the highest winning % since 83.  If
    > this is incorrect, then so was the TV or radio jock that I heard it
    > from.  
      
    I believe that Elway has more *wins* than any other QB in that period,
    not the highest winning percentage.  The major reason for this is that
    Elway is probably the most durable QB in the league.  Correct me if I'm
    wrong, but I'm pretty sure that Joe Montana and maybe some others have 
    a higher winning percentage than Elway (and Montana and his backups
    have more wins, which is another way of saying the 49ers have won more
    games than the Broncos in the time period).
    
    Hey, I think Carlos is full of it on Elway too, Big Game, but after all 
    that bull you slung last week you've got it coming, dontcha think?
         
    glenn
                                                       
36.825The comma policeSHALOT::MEDVIDnot one ounce or inch of controlMon Jan 13 1992 18:279
    After attaining god-like status a week ago, Elway affectionatly became
    "Big Bad John"
    
    After yesterday's performance, add a comma to that monicker to make it
    "Big, Bad John"
    
    Thank you.
    
    	--dan'l 
36.826QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Mon Jan 13 1992 19:439
    
     Glenn,  You're proably right about that (Me deserving some trash)
    But for someone to say that one the leagues greatest QB's faked an
    injury in outragous.  
    
     Elway's winning percentage in higher than anyone in the league...
    Marino is right behind him for the period of 83 - Today
    
    Big Game
36.827COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterMon Jan 13 1992 19:458
      I personally didn't think Elway had that bad of a day until the
    obvious TO.   Its hard to have a great day when you don't have time to
    throw the ball.
    
      Next year, the Broncos still need good OL & DL!!!  Once they get that
    area covered,  then they can play with the best IMO.
    
    	Tim
36.828Nexted year!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Jan 13 1992 19:4629
36.829QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Mon Jan 13 1992 19:546
    
     Can't wait till nexted year...  Todd M. is gonna get a real intro to 
    the NFL.  Count 2 sure wins for the Donks against the Faiders Nexted
    year !!
    
    
36.830and the faithful suck it up and wonder why not us?CNTROL::CHILDSDean &amp; BBJ two of a kindTue Jan 14 1992 10:2915
 I too though Elway was giving us the hollywood treatment wiht the injury.
 He didn't eve get hit on his thigh with the ground or a player on that
 scramble he came up lame on...

 and then I read this last night quote by BBJ

 "I had a little window there, Wright got his hand in there, I should have
  made the tackle."

 huh?  Hey John maybe just maybe you shouldn't have thrown the pass considering 
 where you were on the field. His goddam ego won't allow him to admit he made
 a mistake...

 mike
36.831VLAB::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesTue Jan 14 1992 10:374
       In all fairness to Mr Ed, if you look at the replay of when he got
    injured, someone's hand, caint remember if it was someone else's or Ed's
    own hoof, was between his thigh and the ground when he hit the turf.
                                            Denny
36.832AXIS::ROBICHAUDHOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknightTue Jan 14 1992 10:485
    ...and in all fairness for Mr Ed, Wright pulled back at just the
    right time.  The Buffalo defense made a great read and adjusted
    at just the right time.  
    
    				/Don
36.833CNTROL::CHILDSDean &amp; BBJ two of a kindTue Jan 14 1992 13:0414
>    ...and in all fairness for Mr Ed, Wright pulled back at just the
>    right time.  The Buffalo defense made a great read and adjusted
>    at just the right time.  
    

 Cmon now Slasher Wright was right in front. Big Bad John saw him stop, he
 had time to pull the ball back and go to another option but Mr. Miracle-
 work's ego took over and told him he could get that ball through there.
 After all he's Big Bad John the meanest hombre in the NFL. 

 yeah right...

 mike
36.834Which has been the knock on Elway all along...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 14 1992 13:159
    
    Elway had both Wright and Carlton Bailey in the vicinity of the screen.
    If one didn't get a paw on the ball, the other would have (actually,
    bothdid eventually).  It was a very poor decision throwing into the 
    area, regardless of whether the defense read the screen or not.  That's 
    what checking off your defense is for...
    
    glenn
    
36.835QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 13:2112
    
     If the ball get through, it a really big play.  You guys can slam
    John all you want, thats ok.  It's just to bad that the teams you
    have made your own didn't make it as far as the Broncos did this year.
    You know Childs...  If i didn't know you were such a Butt Head I might
    actually get pissed off about your silly assed comments.  But...  When
    I consider the source of the garbage that is being spewed I only say
    to myself "It's just that Jerk Mikey Childs, the clueless one" and go 
    on with my day.  When your team make the championship game again, 
    we'll talk !!
    
    Big Game
36.836COBRA::BRYDIEHoward Roark laughed.Tue Jan 14 1992 15:3310
  
     Gee Big Game, for someone who says he's not a Donks fanatic
    you sure get mighty upset when people rag on 'em. The fact
    of the matter is that the Denver defense deserved a better 
    fate - they played excellently. As for 'Big Bad John', his per-
    formance Sunday speaks for itself. Buffalo gave him excellent 
    field position on virtually every possession and he didn't get 
    it done. 
    
36.837CNTROL::CHILDSDean &amp; BBJ two of a kindTue Jan 14 1992 16:1814
 Jack atleast when my teams make the championship game they win....I also
 have never claimed any of my players to be the greatest thing since sliced
 bread.

 face it man Elway is a big dumb athletic QB who's claim to fame is late
 game comebacks which for the most part have been 20% brains and 80% brawn.
 He's never led the league in passing %, yardages, or TDS. He may have led
 the league in intys or placed second a few times only cause Testeverdi is
 in the league...

 you have a good day now pal...

 mike
36.838CSC32::SALZERTue Jan 14 1992 16:4510
    If I had a nickle in my pocket for every Bronco loss they shoulda
    won, I'd get hernia just trying to get up out of my chair.
    No one can convince me that Buffalo is a far superior team. 
    The Broncos know their shortcomings and can build from that.
    They'll be back and so will I. See you all late next summer
    when the pre-season schedule winds down. It already looks like
    92 is going to be a very good year.
    
    later,
    Bob on Broncos 
36.839Biased...? Who me..?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jan 14 1992 16:5019
    >I also have never claimed any of my players to be the greatest thing 
    >since sliced bread.
    
    Good point Mr. Childs, although I doubt it will be taken. As long as
    Elway's been the QB for the doinks the reasons for his poor performance
    have been the lack of a running attack, or lack of a decent TE, or
    because of poor play of the O-line, or anything other than Big Dolt
    John. Despite my earlier (and constant, within this notesfile) bashing
    of Elway, I think that he has demonstrated flashes of brilliance (ala
    the Houston game) throughout his career and Elway fans would have us to
    believe that this is the total embodiment (sp?) of Elway with the
    exception of an occasional bad game or two. But it is only cause they
    choose to look the other way, or place blame elsewhere, when the Mr.
    Hyde half of Elway shows up (ala the Buffalo game). I realize that no
    QB (or person for that matter) is perfect, but trying to sell us on
    Elway having an occasional bad game is just not dealing with reality.
    It's more like every other week. 
    
    Carlos
36.840QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 17:019
    
    
     YAP !  YAP !  YAP ! 
    
     You guys sound like Clevelane fans !!
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game Junta
36.841Talk trash and you get garbage in returnANGLIN::KIRKMANBack to shoveling snow again (Uugh)Tue Jan 14 1992 17:106
    From the recent replies, I thought Denver fans and Cleveland fans
    were one and the same thing.
    
    :-)
    
    Scott
36.842Moon criticized for catchable passes; Bills didn't drop Elway'sNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 14 1992 17:119
    
    The most delicious irony is that the Bronco fans who were bashing DrM
    last week for claiming the Oilers were the better team in their game 
    are now making the exact same excuses for their beloved Donks!  All 
    except one particularly outspoken Donk fan who hasn't been seen hide
    nor hair of since, that is...
    
    glenn
      
36.843Someones obviously envious!!!!COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 14 1992 19:148
      Glenn,  are I included in that last statement?  If so,  go back 
    through the replies to show me where I said the better team didn't win
    at Buffalo,  then I will agree with you,  but until then I think your
    statement is full of it,  and not TOTALLY true!
    
      The Broncos (treadweel & biff) beat themselves.  Buffalo didn't!
    
    	Tim
36.844ELMAGO::CGRIEGOGilligan,Gomer,Jethro,ElwayTue Jan 14 1992 19:227
    Re -1
    
    Another classic example of Doinky Denial, as it's known in physc
    circles. The donks never lose because of Elway's poor play, or because
    of the other teams good play.....go figure.
    
    Carlos
36.845Glad you clarified that, Tim... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 14 1992 19:3115
    
    > Glenn,  are I included in that last statement? 
    
    No, Tim, I left it at those Bronco fans who were criticizing DrM for
    stating that the Oilers beat themselves (missed field goal, dropped TD
    passes) and then turned around and moaned that the Broncos did the 
    same in the Buffalo game.
    
    >  The Broncos (treadweel & biff) beat themselves.  Buffalo didn't!
    
    With this comment I might have to re-consider, though... who was that
    team that had the 10 next to their name on the scoreboard to Denver's 7?
    
    glenn
     
36.846You Guys Ain't Worth Conversing With !!QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 19:327
    Hey...  Show me one note where I said that the better team didn't
    win.  Just one !!  Also,  Show me where I said that Elway had no
    part in the loss.  You guys got you head up...  Well, you know what 
    I mean.  I love how the Anti-Donks come crawling out of the woodwork
    after an important Broncos loss.  Give me a break !!
    
    Big Game Junta
36.847Is it camp time already?COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Jan 14 1992 19:436
      I was testing you Glenn,  with the last statement anyway.
    
      Carlos,  go back and read it again.  Maybe I need to exlain,  but it
    probably wouldn't do any good;^)
    
    	Tim
36.848NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 14 1992 19:4413
    
    Hey, no one mentioned your name, either, Big Game, so if you don't fit
    the description, quit sounding so paranoid...
    
    > I love how the Anti-Donks come crawling out of the woodwork
    > after an important Broncos loss. 
    
    Which would explain the level of activity in here last week after an
    important Broncos' win, including some timely comments on an another
    impending Elway crash-and-burn against a quality defense...
    
    glenn
                                  
36.849GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Tue Jan 14 1992 20:288
    
    	Hey glenn!  Were you talking about me? :*) 
    
    	Make that a big ole :*)
    
    	Tim, quit worrying so much about what these guys think.
    
    	Claybroon
36.850Smileys go here...ROYALT::ASHENote new node name...Tue Jan 14 1992 21:002
    I hope you weren't talking about me, because I didn't read most of the
    notes, and wouldn't want to be paranoid for no reason...
36.851QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 21:073
     Yea, Tim...  You worry to much about these Wardlevanes...
    
    Big Game Junta
36.852it's only a game it's only a game it's only a game CNTROL::CHILDSDean &amp; BBJ two of a kindWed Jan 15 1992 08:514
 I'm not going to say nuthin, just want to take a break to laugh..

 hahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
36.853Get the *light* schedual and see what happensJUNCO::WHITEHAIRWed Jan 15 1992 14:247
    
    	SEASONS OVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    	HEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEH!
    
    	AAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
    
36.854COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Jan 15 1992 14:4714
      Mike,  if you want a laugh,  just look in the mirror.....
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    See  lame huh?  Kinda hit home with ya?;^))))
36.855QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Wed Jan 15 1992 18:579
    Lasted quite a bit longer than the Clowns though.... BTW,
    when was the last time (In modern history) the the `Spots 
    made it to a conference championship game.  I can think of
    a few time they were close but got slamed by the Mighty 
    Broncos.
    
     HHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
    
    Big Game
36.856CAMONE::WAYNude up and NoteThu Jan 16 1992 10:0214
>    Lasted quite a bit longer than the Clowns though.... BTW,
>    when was the last time (In modern history) the the `Spots 
>    made it to a conference championship game.  I can think of
>    a few time they were close but got slamed by the Mighty 
>    Broncos.

They played the Broncos for the Conference Championship in 1986.
Cleveland had the best record that year in the AFC.

The Broncos won, and went on to be squashed by the Giants in the
Super Bowl.

hth,
'Saw
36.857VLAB::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jan 16 1992 10:073
       Didn't the Donks beat Cleve. in a couple other conference
    champeenship games too? Anyone know how they did after those games?
                                        Denny 8^o
36.858CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementThu Jan 16 1992 19:016
    The Donks beat the Brown(spot)s(tm) in the 1989 AFC Championship game,
    and, true to form, went on to get smeared on the wall by the 49ers in
    the Super Bowl.
    
    JaKe
    
36.859BSS::G_MCINTOSHWe have always been among you!Wed Jan 22 1992 18:5512
    As you probably already know, Reeves fired Shanahan as offensive
    coordinator because their not on the same page offensively
    philosophically.  I have no comment on that.  
    
    But then I heard that the leading candidate to replace Shanahan is 	
    DAN HENNING.  I think that's a wonderful idea.  Henning is just the one
    to work with Reeves.  He's submissively brilliant and will work up an
    offensive game plan given Reeves' parameters. He's run-oriented, as 
    Reeves is and you can see how well his offensive genius has worked in 
    San Diego and Atlanta.  This is a fine choice!  ;-) ~/~
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.860VLAB::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Jan 22 1992 18:572
       I thought for sure the Donks would grab Joe Walton.
                                      Denny
36.861CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Wed Jan 22 1992 19:006
    Heard here in Pgh that Walton may be headed cross-state to the Eagles.
    
    Pity the Eagles if this is true!!!
    
    JaKe
    
36.862Titles and Acquisitions galore there!GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Wed Jan 22 1992 20:038
    
    Other Bronco tidbits:
    
    	Simon Fletcher frequented one of my favorite spots in Denver,
    	Shotgun Willie's, the other night and dotted some guys eye.
    	He was arrested........
    
    Claybroon
36.863COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Jan 22 1992 20:048
      Thanks  for bummin me out.  The donks don't need those guys! 
    Shannahan hasn't done much since returning from faiders.  Uncle Al
    musta "paid" him well.  As a matter o fact,  the Broncos haven't beaten
    the faids since Shanahan came back....Suspicous?
    
      Mike had his good offensive years before he went to faids.
    
    	Tim
36.864BSS::JCOTANCHWed Jan 22 1992 21:556
    I wasn't too excited to see Henning's name at the top of the list
    either, Glenn.  The biggest reason for Shanahan's firing was that he
    wanted more responsibility than Reeves wanted to give him.
    
    
    Joe
36.865CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RThu Jan 23 1992 11:582
	Henning was hired yesterday as the new offensive coordinator
	for Detroit.
36.866QUASER::HUNTERWhere Ever You Are,There You AreThu Jan 23 1992 13:093
    GOOD...
    
     BG
36.867Has this been brought up in Denver?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jan 23 1992 13:4413
    
    > I wasn't too excited to see Henning's name at the top of the list
    > either, Glenn.  The biggest reason for Shanahan's firing was that he
    > wanted more responsibility than Reeves wanted to give him.
    
    Does Reeves have some kind of problem with the authority of underlings?
    Just seems like quite a few respected assistants who have been around
    the Broncos for years have gotten the boot lately.  Most of them are
    now employed by the New England Patriots, right?
    
    glenn
    
    
36.868FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jan 23 1992 14:325
    Most of our current defensive staff has a Denver connection - Defensive
    Coordinator Joe Collier, DL Coach Stan Jones, LB Coach Myrel Moore and
    DB Coach Charlie West.  Mac was also at Denver from 1967-70.
    
    John
36.869BSS::JCOTANCHThu Jan 23 1992 20:3522
    
>    Does Reeves have some kind of problem with the authority of underlings?
>    Just seems like quite a few respected assistants who have been around
>    the Broncos for years have gotten the boot lately.  Most of them are
>    now employed by the New England Patriots, right?
   
    Glenn W.,
    The firing of Collier and the rest of the defensive coaching staff
    following the '88 season was for different reasons.  The 1988 version
    of the Bronco defense was a sieve and the Bronco organization decided
    it was time for a new defensive coaching structure.  
    
    Now I wasn't too crazy about the Shanahan firing myself.  When Shanahan
    was running the offense in '87 they were very productive, and I don't
    think he had as much of a role in running things this past season
    as he had in '87.  Reeves wants to be the offensive coordinator as well
    as head coach, so I guess what he's actually looking for is an
    'assistant' offensive coordinator. 
     
    
    Joe
    
36.870BSS::G_MCINTOSHWe have always been among you!Thu Jan 23 1992 21:266
    Henning turned Reeves down and accepted the offensive coordinator job
    at Detroit.  I don't understand this.  Why would a run-oriented coach
    accept an offensive coordinator position on a r&s team?  The only
    reason I can think of is to expand his horizons.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.871Barry over tackle for 2 yds, up the middle for 3 more ... yawnEARRTH::BROOKSMrT = Craven WeenieVaneThu Jan 23 1992 21:561
    There goes the Lions ....
36.872DECWET::METZGER/Slasher welshes on a bet?Thu Jan 23 1992 22:318
Zactly what I was thinking DOc.

Why one of the most exciting offensive teams in footbal would hire Dan Henning
as an offensive coordinator is beyond me. Sort of like Hiring Joe Walton to
be your offensive coordinator or little Shula to be your head coach...

Metz
36.873sigh...ROYALT::ASHEPlato,Homer,Voltaire,Deliverance DudeFri Jan 24 1992 03:381
    Dan Henning  Offensive Coord... Raymond Berry QB coach....
36.874VLAB::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Jan 24 1992 11:232
       Kinda like hiring Ray Barry as Qb coach eh?
                                        Denny
36.875LUNER::BROOKSMrT = Craven WeenieVaneFri Jan 24 1992 13:1813
    In fairness to Henning, he was the OC for some of Washington's better
    teams under Gibbs (after his (Henning's) tenure as Atlanta's coach),
    but that was the one-back, multi-TE offense.
    
    I guess Fontes still wants to modify the R&S some more. I fear he's
    going to really screw it up. I hope he doesn't forget that while Barry
    would be great in any offense, the R&S makes him especially lethal, due
    to the fact that 4-WR's makes it very difficult for opponents to stack
    7 and 8 men near the line.
    
    Ask the Cowboys if you don't believe me ....
    
    Doc
36.876RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 14:2231
    Wouldn't it be funny if the Lions next year made the Super Bowl?  I
    think it would.  
    
    Imagine if the Lions did modify the R&S even more - and gosh forbid -
    got a little boring.  Imagine if Rodney Peete lasted a whole year in
    that formation.
    
    Imagine if Henning and Berry put in more controlled rollouts by Peete.
    
    Just imagine.  
    
    Therman Thomas doesn't play in a run and shoot - but he does in a hurry
    up.  Hasn't hurt his numbers, now has it?   Why is it automatically
    assumed that Sanders would suffer?  If he's as great a back as he seems
    to be, he should be able to prosper in any offense.  
    
    Houston has been the only team to run the R&S consistently.  The reason
    being that Warren Moon has remained (luckily) relatively injury-free.
    Detroit has not had that luxury.   From observing both teams - and I do
    realize that Detroit's o-line is not up to par with Houston's - that
    Moon is much more under control - more of a pocket attack than the
    Lions.   IMO, the R&S - like ALL offensive schemes, needs an above
    average offensive line.  The big mistake the Lions made was going to
    the R&S before they had even a semblance of a line.  
    
    I also don't understand why you can't run the R&S with a
    multi-tightend.   Sanders, 2 wide-outs and 2 tight ends still gives ya
    5 options.  And by doing seam passes to the tight ends, or crossing
    clear outs over the middle, you would open up the outside game.
    
    JD
36.877COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterFri Jan 24 1992 16:046
      Buffalo does have a form of R&S.  I think they use the 3 WRs 1 TE &
    Whiney RB.  Its obviously effective for them since they had the #1
    offense this year.  Kelly & co always keeps the defense offguard by
    throwing in all situations.
    
    	Tj
36.878RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 16:234
    So Tim, does every hurry up offense automatically qualify as a R&S?
    I think not.
    
    JD
36.879Who cares what you call it?NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 24 1992 16:4416
                
    > So Tim, does every hurry up offense automatically qualify as a R&S?
    > I think not.
    
    No, but they're all essentially wimpy girlymon offenses, which is your
    objection, right?  I mean if the ball's in the air all the time, from
    an aesthetic viewpoint it doesn't really doesn't much matter what the 
    technical details are...
    
    I kind of like the variety and the pitting of true innovations one
    against the other.  As opposed to baseball, which remains constant, in
    a lot of ways that's what football is all about (beyond the core,
    physical contact).
    
    glenn
    
36.880RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 17:1010
    Glenn -
    
    I"ve never called the Bills offense a wimpy girly-mon offense.  Though
    Andre Reed did go into a shell last year after getting whacked around
    by the manly Giants.  ;-)
    
    Plus, in last year's super bowl, I was more impressed with the Bills
    running attack then passing attack.  Both td's were on the ground.
    
    JD
36.881EARRTH::BROOKSMrT = Craven WeenieVaneFri Jan 24 1992 17:1330
    Good one Glenn. JD is now trying to ease in to the Buffalo camp, even
    though they were the epitome of 'girly-mon' and 'wimp' football style
    this time lasted year.
    
    As for why you can't run a R&S with two TE's, you can if the TE's are
    quick - most are not. Remember that the *inside* receivers in the R&S
    are usually the most dangerous, and also have the most reads to make,
    hence adjustments in their pass routes. TE's are more susceptable to
    being jammed, have the reaction time of a battleship, and most of all
    (IMO), can still be covered (a lot of the time) by LB's and safeties.
    
    One advantage of the R&S is that you force the defense to use personel
    in ways they never planned to. The defense has to use 5 and 6 DB's far
    more than they would like to. One-dimensional run-stuffing LB's have to
    be pulled, and havoc is wreaked. With 2 TE's, the defense isn't
    required to adjust as drastically.
    
    Finally, the Lions run the R&S differently from Houston in these ways :
    
    1) The Lions use more 1/2 rolls than Houston.
    2) The Lion QB's run more than Houston's.
    3) The Lions's employ more screen passes and run the ball more than
    Houston.
    4) Houston has superior WR's and OL than Detroit.
    5) Houston goes to their outside receivers more outside the 20.
    
    Some of this is dictated by personel, and some by the variance in
    offensive philosophy of Mouse Davis vs. Kevin Gilbride.
    
    Doc
36.882CRLPS::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 24 1992 17:185
36.883 whir,whir,whiz,whir DECWET::METZGER/Slasher welshes on a bet?Fri Jan 24 1992 17:2729
JD,

You better stop spinning like a top or you're going to get real dizzy and 
chunder.

The biggest problem with modifying the R&S to have 2 TE's instead of 2 wr's is
the fact that there aren't many good TE's in the pro-game. There are very few
TE's that can both block and pass receive.

If you had a TE tandem like Kellen Winslow and Keith Jackson you could run
this modified R&S because you could split both of them out to keep the defense
honest and they would have the speed to force them to be covered by a DB 
instead of a LB.

Face it. Most of the time you see a TE go for big yardage is when they hide 
out on the line and get lost and then go upfield. Usually it's a result of
blown coverage instead of a great route by the TE.

The only team with the quality Te's needed for this would be Dallas. With 
Jay Novchek and Robert Awalt. Although Awalt is more of a blocker than a
reciever.

Just take a look at the TE's going to the pro bowl and you'll see a real
lack of quality in the position. 


Metz
 
36.884GENRAL::WADEWhose idea was it to hang these ferns?Fri Jan 24 1992 17:505
    
    	Hey!  Get all this R&S talk out of this *pristine* Bronco
    	note will ya! :*)
    
    	Claybroon
36.885ha haFRETZ::HEISERimagination &gt; knowledgeFri Jan 24 1992 17:542
    But this pristine Bronco offense has won as many Super Bowls as the R&S
    offense!
36.886Spin thisRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 18:0243
    Doc -
    
    Where am I easing into the Bills camp?  What the hell are you talking
    about.  I've never heard the Bills offense called anything other than
    hurry-up or no-huddle.  They use the tight end effectively (you could
    read the article about that in USA Today, BTW...)
    
    Mac -
    
    I'm not the only person who thinks that the Bills could benefit, at
    times, by slowing down.  That was brought up many times after last
    years' Super Bowl - when it was blatantly obvious thatthe defense
    needed some rest time.  It was brought up by Walsh in the Denver game.
    And teh whole idea of Bill Belechik's defense last year was to let the
    Bills catch the stuff over the middle - and then whack them.  Andre
    Reed, for example, had a good first period.  He caught some balls, took
    some licks.  He got creamed on one hit - and he was never the same. 
    The defense was "Big guys hitting little guys" as SI put it.
    
    Metz -
    
    No spin by me.  I merely said that I think Barry Sanders would be a
    great runner in any offense.  Again, I ask - do you disagree?  Do you
    (and DOC) think that he can only play in run and shoot?  Do you
    disagree that Thurman Thomas has excelled?  I brought that point up. 
    And the tight end scheme could work, IMO.  The one thing using tight
    ends does is it doesn't allow for 6 or 7 defensive back schemes.  Teams
    keep the linebackers in.  So where's the spin?   
    
    And to all three of ya - do you think there's any correlation to the
    way Detroit used the R&S and the high incidence of their QB's getting
    hurt?   Wasn't one of the largest factors in the improvement of the
    LIons this year the FACT that their defense played much, much better
    than in past years?  Werent' Houston's AND Atlanta's defenses much
    better also?  Everyone jumps on the offense's bandwagon - but the
    defense has to be there.  
    
    And also, ALL, are folks modifying the definition of the Run and Shoot
    to include any team that passes more than runs?  Then just about every
    team must be run and shoot!  I guess the Marino led Dolphins and Fouts
    led Chargers and Boomer led Bengals are all R&S teams...
    
    JD
36.887CRLPS::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 24 1992 18:1814
36.888Maybe it's the QB...ROYALT::ASHEPlato,Homer,Voltaire,Deliverance DudeFri Jan 24 1992 18:223
    Maybe Peete's injury prone... he was hurt a couple times in college
    right?  I mean do you consider the Eagles a R&S team?  They've had
    a lot of QB's get hurt...
36.889QUASER::HUNTERWhere Ever You Are, There You AreFri Jan 24 1992 18:223
    THERMAL IS A WHINER !!
    
    BG
36.890RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 19:1111
    Mac -
    
    I never mentions championships once today.  
    
    But I think I understand you, Doc and Metz.  Say only things that you
    guys wanna hear.  ANything else is spinning.  Thanks for clearing it
    up.
    
    And all I hear is how superior the R&S is, yet its proven nothing.
    
    JD
36.891NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jan 24 1992 19:1711
    
    > And all I hear is how superior the R&S is, yet its proven nothing.
      
    I honestly wasn't trying to tick you off, JD, was just looking for a
    clarification: is it the run-and-shoot that bothers you or the fact
    that it's a pass-oriented offense?  I thought it was the latter.  It 
    has been shown that other non-R & S offenses throw the ball with a 
    similarly high percentage... 
    
    glenn
    
36.892CRLPS::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 24 1992 19:2224
36.893ROYALT::ASHEPop Pop goes the weasel, the weasel...Fri Jan 24 1992 19:271
    I don't think anyone said it was superior, just a real alternative...
36.894RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 20:2626
    Glenn -
    
    Actually I only have a strong dislike for the R&S - especially when
    played by teams that are dome teams.  Doesn't seem like real football
    to me.  
    
    MAc -
    
    You're right.  It has proven that it can get teams into the playoffs. 
    However, since its inception, I've read and heard about it being super
    fantastic - the greatest - etc.  But so far, the teams that use it
    haven't one a championship (yep, there's the word).  And not just a
    Super Bowl C-word, but even a conference c-word.  I hear about how
    boring other offenses are - offenses that have won c-words.  And use,
    my assertion - and it isn't a revelation - is that defense wins
    c-words.  
    
    Walt -
    
    Yep, it is an alternative.  But, so far, no matter what wrinkles
    offensive folks have thought up, defenses catch up.  And c-word teams
    tend to be those who use older (or boring) type offenses, with good
    defenses (or great defenses).    Perhaps it's all genetics.  More
    little guys out there than big guys.
    
    JD
36.895COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterFri Jan 24 1992 20:341
      What they said JD!~
36.896CRLPS::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jan 24 1992 20:3532
36.897RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 20:5519
    Mac -
    
    I've said numerous times IN MY OPINION ( or have used IMO) - if you or
    Doc or Metz have a hard time with that - its your problem.  I've said
    the dome-team thang countless times. 
    
    I believe MrT was the only person I ever read call the Niners offense
    wimpy and girly-mon.  That's one person.   I could use Doc as a counter
    example to refute all that you've said.
    
    But then again, Doc is the R&S's strongest proponent - so that goes a
    long way to explaining its worth.  ;-)
    
    Oh, and when I said I've read and heard about the R&S - I'm talking
    about outside publications.   The offense of the nineties.  The
    unstoppable offense.  The wave of the future. Etc.   Not what I've read
    in here.  
    
    JD
36.898DECWET::METZGER/Slasher welshes on a bet?Fri Jan 24 1992 21:3812
Whirrrrrr, whirrrrrrr, whizzzzzzzz

JD,

 How about listing all the criteria for a real football team in here? They 
we would have one place where we could reference as to your girly-man football
ramblings. You change the criteria as much as you changed the criteria as to 
what makes a #1 college team....


Metz
36.899RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOR U pre-mousse or post mousse?Fri Jan 24 1992 21:404
    The only criteria is they have a football and enough guys to field a
    team.
    
    JD
36.900LUNER::BROOKSBy The Time I Get To Arizona !Mon Jan 27 1992 13:037
    I never said that the R&S is the cat's meow, just that it is viable,
    fun, and can work in this league. 
    
    If you have a problem with it, try to base it on facts, not on a bad
    case of testosterone poisoning ...
    
    DOc
36.901QUASER::HUNTERJaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !!Mon Jan 27 1992 15:547
    Broncos to the Bowl in `93...  Look for another return to the
    AFC championship game for the Donks this year.  Denver would 
    have pummeled the `Skins yesterday...   ;^)
    
    BG
    
    
36.902FMCSSE::BROWNI met Dynamo Hum last nightMon Jan 27 1992 17:2314
    
    
    	Jack,
    
    
     Don't kid yourself. No body was going to be the Skin's on 26-Jan-92
    Especically them damn donkey's.
    
     Since denver has the NFC East on their schedule next your we'll
    see how they do. They might get by Pheonix again.
    
    Cadzilla
    
    
36.903ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYBoringDistraughtRobberyVictimMon Jan 27 1992 20:0113
    You're right, Game.  It was a danged shame that John (Big Bad John)
    got the deep thigh bruise thus robbing the Broncs a a shot at these
    overrated Redskins.  Advantage?  Dan Reeves is nowhere near as stupid
    as Dr. Marv Levy.  When Dr. Marv was running out during the game 
    intros that sheet-eating "I'm sorry" sheepish grin on his face served
    notice to the world that he didn't believe his game plan would work or
    his team was anywhere near ready.
    
    Also, a little Comparitive Brain work would also show us that the 
    club-footed Jim Kelly and his deep centerfield passes woulda NEVER 
    sprung from the quick-witted hands a John (Big Bad John).
    
    MrT
36.904CRLPS::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jan 27 1992 20:047
36.905NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jan 27 1992 20:0610
    
    > Also, a little Comparitive Brain work would also show us that the 
    > club-footed Jim Kelly and his deep centerfield passes woulda NEVER 
    > sprung from the quick-witted hands a John (Big Bad John).
    
    Naw, Big Bad Jawn woulda stuck with the delayed screen to accomplish
    his dirty work...
    
    glenn
    
36.906ROYALT::ASHEHis name is Honest Abe &amp; he's here to say...Mon Jan 27 1992 20:192
    ...hitting Wilbur Marshall with a 10 yard shovel pass?
    
36.907CNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationTue Jan 28 1992 11:595
T, you ought to talk to Ms. I. Odegaard abnout this blockage of yours over
BBJ's awful first half performance...

;^)
36.908doctor-patient confidentialityANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYBoringDistraughtRobberyVictimTue Jan 28 1992 13:164
    How do *you* know about Dr. Inga, Childs?  That was a private
    communique, and a most serious one.  Where is that crook anyway.
    
    MrT
36.909I see her myself from time to time ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationWed Jan 29 1992 13:012
she's helping me with my latent fears that all republicans are evil...
36.910CAMONE::WAYCuimhnich, 13 February 1692Wed Jan 29 1992 13:1719
>she's helping me with my latent fears that all republicans are evil...


We're not Mikey.  Some of us stand for truth, honor, justice, the true
American way of life, hard work, patriotism, and lots of other cool
things.

It's just that those of us who do are in a position where we don't have
the $$$ to mount a campaign.


Hell, if I thought *I* could do any good, and if *I* had the money, I'd
run.  I couldn't do any worse than the bozos now.  


Take heart my friend.....  and if not, have fun with Inga!  8^)


'Saw
36.911BSS::JCOTANCHThu Jan 30 1992 14:579
    Broncos traded Nattiel to Tampa yesterday for Tampa's 6th-round pick
    this year plus a conditional pick next year.  A good move since Ricky
    would've landed (and probably picked up) on the plan B list.
    
    Also heard a rumor which is not good: Michael Young will not be
    protected on plan B.  
    
    
    Joe
36.912BSS::G_MCINTOSHWe have always been among you!Thu Jan 30 1992 19:435
    Michael Young has made it clear that he wants to play in DENVER and not
    necessarily some other city.  It's assumed, I believe, that for that
    reason it's safe to have him on plan B.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.913COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterThu Jan 30 1992 19:558
      I think Nattiel will work out well for TB.  He might end up making
    Vinnie look good barring another injury.  I don't think the broncos
    utilized him well,  and they didn't coach him right.  JMHO.
    
      I hope Denver gets a good draft pick in the 6th.  Any kind of
    lineman would help.
    
    	Tim
36.914BSS::G_MCINTOSHWe have always been among you!Thu Jan 30 1992 20:494
    I heard a rumor that Reeves was now going to hire JACK ELWAY as
    offensive coordinator.  Too much!
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.915QUASER::HUNTERJaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !!Thu Jan 30 1992 20:576
     #$%^%^&*&(^&%*(  Looks like the Donks are gonna start playing 
    games.  They had better make it clear with Young why he's being
    unprotected.  Losing him would be a problem.  Jack Elway as OC,
    aye glenn...  You sure you ain't just /~/...
    
    BG
36.916BSS::G_MCINTOSHWe have always been among you!Fri Jan 31 1992 02:033
    Jack, yer know me better than that!
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
36.917USCTR2::NAHEARNFri Jan 31 1992 13:595
    Mike Shanahan has been hired by the 49ers as Offensive Coordinator!!
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
36.918ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWeSaveBabySealsButKillBabyHumans!Tue Feb 04 1992 16:103
    Re -1, Yechh! How offensive!
    
    
36.919Eitherway out for at least a year....ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRFri Feb 07 1992 16:336
36.920COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterFri Feb 07 1992 16:357
      Shouldn't this be in the donks note? 
    
      Anyway,  I haven't heard that.  I have heard that he will probably
    have surgery by one of 2 California doctors,  but when and rehab, etc..
    I have heard nothing....
    
    	Tim
36.920exQUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareFri Feb 07 1992 17:136
36.921oh how the mighty have fallen!FRETZ::HEISERtears in heavenFri Feb 07 1992 17:221
    
36.922ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRFri Feb 07 1992 17:297
    
    	not what I heard at all!!  Elway out for the entire 92 - 93 
    	season because of permanent damage to his sholder because
    	he kept playing with an injury.  Not only will he be out for
    	next season but, there is the possibility he may never play
    	again....   :-(       ;o}
    
36.923I sure hope this is false..RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOU of W Huskies=fraud chickens!Fri Feb 07 1992 17:4210
    
    IF that's true, then that's a big loss for football.  Say what you want
    about John Elway - but he is a truley gifted athletes - and a hybrid at
    quarterback.  If his career is over, I personally feel that it is
    football - and all football's fans - loss.  
    
    I have heard a rumour that the Broncos were interested in signing Dave
    Krieg.
    
    JD
36.924Elway: Bronco's strength or liability? HYDRA::HAUSRATHGREAT new Pepsi 'Can'Fri Feb 07 1992 17:455
    
    
    If true, what a pity.. the end of Superbowl blowouts..   forever!!!  
    
    /Jeff
36.925we talking Mr. Inty hereCNTROL::CHILDSRodney Dangerfields&gt;The Dream TeamFri Feb 07 1992 17:544
 JD send me some of what you're smokin man....

 ;^)
36.926BSS::JCOTANCHFri Feb 07 1992 18:1116
   
    I have no idea where in the hell Hal heard that he's out for a year or
    more.  Elway is, however, going to have surgery on his shoulder
    somewhere in California.
     
>    I have heard a rumour that the Broncos were interested in signing Dave
>    Krieg.
    
    I think that's exactly what they should do.  Bring in Krieg, who has a
    year or two left, until Moore or some other young QB is ready to be an
    NFL backup.  I haven't heard that Denver has any interest in Krieg yet,
    but I did read that they might be interested in trading for Washington
    backup Stan Humphries.
    
    
    Joe
36.927QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareFri Feb 07 1992 19:234
    Hal tried Hard(tm) to stir the pot in Donkey land !!!
    
    BG
    
36.928CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsTue Feb 11 1992 19:5790
From:	ROYALT::ASHE "Walt Ashe DSG1-1/D9 DTN 235-8150  11-Feb-1992 1158" 11-FEB-1992 12:00:04.55
To:	@[ASHE.DIS]LOONEY
CC:	
Subj:	Anyone heard from Big Game, maybe he's in France naming skis..

In article <oly-nordicU2FA255pe@clarinet.com>, clarinews@clarinet.com (TINA FORDE) writes:
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!tlaeng.enet.dec.com!tkou02.enet.dec.com!jrdzzz.jrd.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!
 usenet.coe.montana.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!lll-winken!looking!clarinews
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (TINA FORDE)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.olympic,biz.clarinet.sample
Subject: Wax Wars Rage
Keywords: olympics, broadcast
Message-ID: <oly-nordicU2FA255pe@clarinet.com>
Date: 10 Feb 92 20:01:10 GMT
Followup-To: biz.clarinet.sample
Lines: 54
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Xref: nntpd.lkg.dec.com clari.sports.olympic:85 biz.clarinet.sample:3913
ACategory: sports
Slugword: oly-nordic
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 508; Id: z4549; Sel: xxsm.; Adate: 2-10-255pes; Ver: sked
Codes: ysm.rxx., tdza...., tdza...., tbza....
Note: (refiling; changing slug)


    
    
	COURCHEVEL, France (UPI) -- To American football fans, the names of
Ryan Heckman's skis would sound familiar.
	One set of skis is known as Dennis Smith, another is called John
Elway and others carry the names of other members of the Denver Broncos.
	``This guy (Heckman) is a huge Broncos' fan,'' said United States
nordic combined coach Tom Steitz. ``So he names all his skis for members
of that team. The others used to name their skis -- one had cartoon
characters -- but it got too confusing. Now, most of them just use
numbers.''
	On this particular day, as the nordic combined Olympic team began
practice runs, Heckman chose to use his ``Gaston Green'' skis -- named
for Denver's star running back.
	Every member of the nordic combined team has 10 to 15 pairs of skis,
including the light, thin, cross-country skis and the heavy, wide skis
for jumping.
	Skis and waxes must be tested constantly against weather and snow
conditions to select the optimum equipment for a competition. The
information is crucial, as a cloud passing below the sun will change the
speed of the course.
	``It's a real pain to tell you the truth,'' Steitz said. ``I'll be
glad when it's standardized.''
	But it is necessary.
	``A fast pair of skis makes the difference between a medal and coming
here to watch,'' Steitz said.
	He said he had set up measuring sensors 30 feet apart on a path near
the competition site at Le Praz, a village which is the actual site of
the ski jump and nordic combined competitions. He had measured the air
temperature and the humidity, and stuck a thermometer in the snow to get
a reading.
	The designated tester changed from one pair of skis to another,
cruising down the slight slope past Steitz, adding his own comments as
he felt the skis respond. After an hour or so, the coach would have
enough information to go back to his hotel and plug the numbers into a
calculator. The right skis and waxes for the race would emerge.
	``We are trying to find the fastest skis for this snow in this
temperature. Then we figure out the fastest wax and match it to the
fastest skis,'' Steitz said.
	``We've done this every day for the last three days. It takes a day
or two to pick out what works best here.''
	If weather for race day changes radically, they will throw it all out
and start again.
	``We'll get up at 3 a.m. and do it,'' Steitz said. ``On race night we
get up every two hours and check the weather. There's no shortcut.''
	Nordic countries wouldn't think of burdening coaches and athletes
with such a job.
	``Most countries have full time ski technicians, but it's kind of
double duty for Team USA,'' Steitz said. ``Sweden and Norway have four
or five guys who have not even been to the jumps. They do this every
day.''
	During World Cup and other events, nordic combined teams will share
knowledge and information. But this is the Olympics.
	``Here everybody's keeping pretty secret,'' Steitz said. ``I don't
dare ask what's working.''

    
    
    HAHA. Gaston Green skis, Elway skis. These guys are destined for a BIG
    choke.. 8^)
    
    MikeL thanks to Walt
    
36.929Even if Elway was gone, Jim Kelly is still here!COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Feb 11 1992 21:015
      If I named skis,  it wouldn't be after men!!  Kathy Ireland,  Elle
    Mcpherson, and other beuties works for me.  Besides,  the ole figure o
    speech "The lady has what it takes" comes to mind eh??
    
    	Tim
36.930LUNER::BROOKSYou down wit MSG ?Wed Feb 12 1992 04:137
    The Elway skis probably fall off in sight of the finish line, with the
    user 3 seconds behind the leader.
    
    However the user is able to claim that his "Big Bad Skees" would have
    gotten him the gold if they had stayed on all the way through ...
    
    Haa.
36.931Some tidbitsCOMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterThu Feb 13 1992 19:0520
      Elway is to have Arthiscopic surgery today in LA.  He should recover
    in 6-8 weeks if things go well.
    
      Robert Perrymen was arrested fur beatin his woman. She caught him
    with other girls phone #'s on his pager....So whats the problem?;)))
    
      Mike Haliburton LB, was in trouble for something else,  but it slips
    my mind as to what it was....
    
      I didn't know Gerold Perry was back in Denver..These guys must hang out
    with him..no punn intended;^
    
    
      Raymond Berry has been hired as QB coach....The recievers coach has
    been promoted to Off Coordinator.  Reeves is still the head offensive
    guy though!
    
      I'm not sure if Berry will be a + or not...
    
    	Tim
36.932COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterThu Mar 19 1992 14:277
      RAndy Robbins has signed with the Patriots I believe.  Either which
    way,  I don't think he will be a big loss.  He played mostly nickel
    back , but did back up Dennis Smith when he played hurt.
    
      Denvers D still can use some better cover guys though...
    
    	Tim 
36.934FRETZ::HEISERmaranatha!Wed Apr 01 1992 15:461
    Good now they can stay out of here!
36.935COBRA::BRYDIEJulie's in the Drug SquadWed Apr 01 1992 15:5010
    
     Whoa, there Mikey ! That's not a very neighborly attitude. 
    
     Personally, I think the idea of a Denver Broncos notesfiles is pretty
     funny. I can't imagine a more depressing place to be the day after the
     Donks get the crap beat out of them in yet another Super Bowl provided
     they get that far.
    
     BTW - Mike did you used to work at GenRad back in the early eighties ?
           I think we may know each other.
36.936FRETZ::HEISERmaranatha!Wed Apr 01 1992 15:544
>     BTW - Mike did you used to work at GenRad back in the early eighties ?
>           I think we may know each other.
    
    No way Brydie!  Is that you?!  I guess I better send mail...
36.937COMET::JACKSONTAMarch madness = ISO 9000Wed Apr 01 1992 22:318
      A broncos conference?   Na......  Youze guys wouldn't know what to do
    with yourselfs during the anual donks vs faids or donks vs spots
    games and if we were " out o here".  There are usually around 500 new
    notes during those weeks and I think for the most part that most people
    laugh at all the stupid notes....you wouldn't want to mis that would
    ya? ;^)
    
    	Tim
36.938USCTR2::NAHEARNThu Apr 02 1992 13:067
    The Broncos signed Steve Pelluer and Rob Awalt.
    
    I'm surprised Awalt opted for Denver...where the TE has not been a
    major focus in the passing game!!
    
    
    Nelly
36.939BSS::JCOTANCHThu Apr 02 1992 13:5515
    
>    I'm surprised Awalt opted for Denver...where the TE has not been a
>    major focus in the passing game!!
    
    True, but he has pretty much been ignored in Dallas since the arrival of
    Novacek.  Plus, he may have been anticipating the departure of Kay
    through plan B, which didn't happen.  Maybe now that Denver has a
    proven pass-catching TE they will start to throw to him more.
    
    Denver chose Pelluer over Mark Herrmann.
    
    
    Joe
    
 
36.940COMET::JACKSONTAMarch madness = ISO 9000Sat Apr 04 1992 19:543
      Pellur & Herman are mediocre QBs at best.
    
      Tj
36.941ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Apr 07 1992 14:214
    Elway, Pellur & Herman are mediocre QBs at best.
    
    (Is it to early to start this crap yet?)
    Carlos
36.942it may be a longggg yearCOMET::JACKSONTAHangManTue Apr 07 1992 16:5711
     re- is it to early,
    
      Thats funny Carlos, 'cause I was ready to ask the same thing in the
    faids file,  but decided against it.....
    
      Besides,  we know which team has QB problems,  and it taint the
    donks!
    
      oops,  getting me going,  you know how!
    
    	Tim
36.943BSS::JCOTANCHTue Apr 07 1992 21:528
    Humphrey was scheduled to work out for the Falcons today.  One of the
    rumors flying around has Bobby going to Atlanta for Mike Pritchard.  I
    think that would be a great trade for Denver - they'd get a good young
    receiver (which they desperately need) who proved in his rookie year
    that he can play in this league, plus he'd be a tremendous hometown
    favorite.  
    
    Joe
36.944Elbert CrawfordAXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Wed Apr 08 1992 14:319
Noticed in todays Globe that ex-Patriot OL Elbert Crawford suffered a
heart attack while working out with the Broncos.

He was signed by Denver as a plan B free agent lasted month.

He is listed in serious condition.


Chap
36.945BSS::JCOTANCHFri Apr 10 1992 15:1723
    Michael Young will undergo back surgery and be out for 4-6 months. 
    This isn't bad news, it's very bad news.  He has become Denver's most
    dependable go-to guy over the past couple of years, and the group of
    receivers on this team has gone from one of the league's best a few
    years ago to mediocre.  
    
    Anyway, I think this will make Denver all-the-more interested in
    Pritchard.  Consider:
     
    - Young will miss training camp and probably at least the early part of
    the regular season.
    - The Falcons acquired Drew Hill in Plan B.
    - Atlanta waived Rozier yesterday, so they should be more interested in
    Humphrey now.
    
    All this is of course in addition to the fact that Denver needed to
    beef up their receiving corps to begin with.
    
    
    OL Elbert Crawford has been taken out of intensive care.
    
    
    Joe
36.946COMET::JACKSONTAHangManFri Apr 10 1992 19:084
      Did this back problem just creep up?  If not,  you would think that
    he would have been operated on 2-3 months ago.
    
    	Tim,  who doesn't read the paper much or watch the news to often...
36.947BSS::JCOTANCHMon Apr 13 1992 16:486
    Tim,
    Young has had problems with his back off and on for a few years and
    from what I understand it just got to a point where he felt he needed
    surgery.
    
    Joe
36.948Just for laughs,COMET::JACKSONTAHangManTue Apr 21 1992 15:097
      Vance Johnson is suing HBO for show him naked "front view" during an
    interview after they beat the oilers in the playoffs last year.  He
    said mama and grandmama was a watching, thus the "embare assment"....
    
      Guess he has to pay for them paternity suits some how;^
    
    	Tim
36.949CAMONE::WAYSchmiede, mein Hammer, ein hartes SchwertTue Apr 21 1992 15:118
Why would he be embarassed cause Ma and Grandma were watching.

I'm *SURE* they know what it looks like already, considering one or both
of them probably changed his diapers when he was a little tyke with 
a scab on his belly-button!


'Saw
36.950funny!HBAHBA::HAASMental ModelTue Apr 21 1992 15:126
ESPN ran a piece on this. After reading the story as reported in -.1, the
announcer - forget his name - said that he hoped the suit wasn't dropped
for lack of evidence, whereupon both announcers proceded to crack up and
were almost unable to get through the nexted piece.

TTom
36.951COMET::JACKSONTAHangManTue Apr 21 1992 15:133
      Don't know why,  but thats what the news guy said....
    
      Maybe there was something (or wasn't) to be embarassed about;^
36.952BSS::JCOTANCHSit down, Kleine!Fri Apr 24 1992 16:3430
    Denver brought in 8 potential draftees last week for interviews and
    workouts.  They were:
    
    Tommy Vardell, FB, Stanford
    Tommy Maddox, QB, UCLA
    Carl Pickens, WR, Tennessee
    Troy Auzenne, OT, Cal
    John Fina, OT, Arizona
    Chris Mims, DT, Tennessee
    Robert Porcher, DT, South Carolina St.
    Dana Hall, CB, Washington
    
    These would be the most likely candidates for Denver to draft at number
    25, but that could all change if they move up by trading Humphrey.  I
    would say there's better than a 50-50 chance he will be traded on draft
    day.
    
    Of the 8 players listed, Denver probably wants Pickens the most but
    he's expected to be gone by the time Denver picks.  One thing that
    surprised me though was that Paul Zimmerman didn't even predict Pickens
    to go in the first round.
    
    There's alot of talk of Denver drafting Maddox or another QB as Elway's
    eventual replacement in the first or second round.  I say it's too
    early to draft a successor to Elway - he's gonna be playing another 3
    or 4 years.
    
    
    Joe
       
36.953CNTROL::CHILDSAnybody but the LakersFri Apr 24 1992 16:415
 I agree Joe, Biff will play  4 maybe even 5 years longer. All depends upon
 how long it takes him to be the all time career leader in interceptions...

 ;^)
36.954I don't like it....right now, anywayBSS::JCOTANCHMon Apr 27 1992 15:1026
Okay, which makes less sense: Cincinnati drafting David Klingler or Denver 
drafting Maddox?  This pick just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me,
especially when you consider that Elway is expected to play another 4 or 5
years and Denver had some other areas of immediate need.  But the worst part
is that Pickens was still available.

The counterpoint to all this is that I may just love this pick 4 or 5 years 
down the road, and I've heard some scouts/coaches/'experts' say that Maddox
would've been a very high pick in another year or two, so maybe Denver will
end up with great QB for the future with a low first-round selection.

Let's just say that the jury will be out on this pick for years, not months.
Meanwhile, don't forget to keep an eye on Pickens the next couple of years
for comparison - I think he will be one great NFL receiver, like all those
other great wideouts from Volunteerland.
 
Denver's other picks yesterday were:

2nd round - Shane Dronett, DL, Texas
4th round - Chuck Johnson, OG, Texas
5th round - Frank Robinson, CB, Boise State

More on these guys later.


Joe
36.955FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Apr 27 1992 15:1110
    I think Maddox makes perfect sense for the Broncs.  They need someone
    to come in and replace Elway from time-to-time, yet they need a
    potential superstar they can develop for the future.  Maddox can ride
    the pine, practice and get some WLAF time and then be ready to step in
    when Elway decides to retire.  Maddox is the type who needs more
    experience and probably should have stayed in school for another year
    (he had two more years of eligibility) but how can anyone argue with
    his decision after becoming a number 1?
    
    John
36.956BSS::JCOTANCHMon Apr 27 1992 15:2913
    I hope you're right John.  One of the knocks on Maddox is that he needs
    time, and he'll certainly have plenty of that.  Plus, he'll only be 21
    in September, so if he started after 3 years of being a backup he'd
    still only be 24.  And if he does turn out to be as good as people
    project, the Broncos can look back at this draft as a great one.
    
    But this isn't a team that should be looking to the future.  With 2 AFC
    title game appearances in the past 3 seasons and Elway on the downside
    of his career, the future is now for Denver.
    
    If anyone's gonna spell Elway this year, it'll be Pelluer.
    
    Joe                                                       
36.957Reeves Philosophy for the 92/93 season.OURGNG::RIGGENFree Ivan the terribleMon Apr 27 1992 15:404
Run the Baw
Run the Baw
Run fer your life Jown
Punt
36.958Reeves is following uncle Al's lead...ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Apr 27 1992 16:1110
    I think gambling on an inexperienced QB with a first round pick that
    could have been used on impact player that is ready to play now was a
    mistake. Of course lasted year, when the Raiders took a gamble in the
    first round on a soph. QB, I liked it, but then again, the Doinks are
    hardly the Raiders, and besides the Raiders needed a QB the Doinks
    don't. I think they would have been better off going after bigger
    needs.
    
    Carlos
    
36.959Time will tell, as always!COMET::JACKSONTAHangManMon Apr 27 1992 20:3511
      I'm undecided.   The broncos needed OL or CB help.  They got them in
    the 4th & 5th round, but probably could have used a higher round pick
    to get "potentially" better players.
    
      I saw this Maddox guy almost beat USC 2 years ago if I remember
    right.  I think it was a game Maranovich won.
    
    
      Whats his physical stats?
    
    	Tim
36.960exELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Apr 27 1992 20:585
    >>What's his physical stats?
    
    6-4, 195 lbs.
    
    Carlos
36.961DECWET::METZGERWe'll always have Paris.Mon Apr 27 1992 21:2922
Personally I'm bummed that Denver picked Maddox. Why? because I hate denver and
Maddox will take them where Mr. Ed never could. To a super bowl championship
within 5-7 years. Denver drafted one smart Qb in Maddox. He'll read defenses
better this year than elway ever could. He's already got a better touch on the
ball than john-boy. 

However it is up to Reeves to modify the game plan around Maddox in 3 years and
implement a couple of things (like screen passes and a quicker passing game 
that relies on brains instead of scrambling ability). 

I wish Detroit had gotten Maddox because in 2 years he wouldda been the starting
QB and Detroit would have been in the big game. Plus it would have been great
to see whose QB would win the battle (Doc's andre (the flop) Ware or my choice
Maddox)... 


Still Bummed.....


Metz
 
36.962COMET::JACKSONTAHangManMon Apr 27 1992 21:501
      Thx Carlos!
36.963It's obvious to everyone ...EARRTH::BROOKSPrince &gt; MadonnaTue Apr 28 1992 17:369
    Metz, why do you beat some issues in the ground ? You ragged on me
    about Peete - or at least tried to, until Peete showed that he was a
    majorleague QB. You tried to crtiozie me because I said that Major
    Harris should have been **drafted** (never said he could/would star). 
    
    And once, you even tried to link me supporting Tony Rice, when I always
    said he'd be a stiff.
    
    You need to do something about this fixation you have dude ...
36.964DECWET::METZGERWe'll always have Paris.Tue Apr 28 1992 19:4420
A little touchy aren't we Dock?

I rag on your QB picks because they are so often wrong. I never said a thing
about Peete except that he'll never put together a complete NFL season. I got
on your case about Harris and Ware because you implied that there were racial
reasons why their stock in the NFL draft dropped when history has shown that
this simply isn't the case. As far as I know I've never tied your name in with
Rice either. I do remember getting on your case when you got upset that it
was mentioned that teams might draft Rice and turn him into a defensive back 
and your shackles got up stating that (again) it was racially motivated.

Your evaluation of QB talent is usually so far off it's an easy target Dock.

Talk to me when Ware gets off the bench,


Metz

 
36.965EARRTH::BROOKSTwentyfive or 6 to 4 ...Tue Apr 28 1992 20:5014
    1) Ware went high in the first round. Stock didn't drop that far eh ?
    
    2) I didn't like Peete dropping ... and since Peete has performed well,
    you've jumped on the Ware bash-wagon.
    
    3) I never said squat about Rice, except that he wasn't an NFL QB.
    But you don't let facts stop a good polemic.
    
    4) Major doesn't have what it takes. So what.
    
    5) You know as much about history as Elway does about winning a Super
    Bowl ... :-)
    
    Try again ...
36.966Which QB is Dock's next annointed one?DECWET::METZGERWe'll always have Paris.Tue Apr 28 1992 21:2413
And are you still predicting great things for Ware?

give me Eric Kramer over Peete or Ware anyday. You'll see both of them
riding the pine this season. Or Peete will start two games until he suffers
yet another injury....

Talk to me when you can evaluate talent without racial bias Dock.

On second thought...don't bother....

Metz
 
36.968BSS::JCOTANCHWed Apr 29 1992 16:2696
Overview of Bronco draft picks:

1st round - Tommy Maddox, QB, UCLA (6-4, 195)
3rd year sophomore...completed 182 of 327 for 2682 yards, 17 TD's and 14
interceptions in 1990 and completed 192 of 315 for 2505 yards, 16 TD's and
15 interceptions in 1991...talented natural athlete but has a side-arm 
delivery which caused alot of his passes to be batted down at the line of
scrimmage...throws a good touch pass and has a good ability to sense and
elude the pass rush...quick release...has innate feel for the passing game and 
picks up secondary receivers well...viewed as a developmental, long-range 
prospect...Mel Kiper says: "At this stage of the game he isn't anywhere close 
to being a finished product, so he has to be considered a major gamble if 
selected in the first 2-3 rounds of the draft.

2nd round - Shane Dronett, DE, Texas (6-5, 270)
Coming out as a true junior...had 44 solo tackles last season with 9 sacks and
8 stops behind the line fo scrimmage.  Caused 4 fumbles and blocked 4 kicks.
Blocked 7 kicks in his career at Texas...go for the gusto type of football 
player, displaying a great deal of enthusiam...active, aggressive, physical
player who excels in shutting down an opponent's outside running game and is
an effective pass rusher...recruited as a tight end out of high school.

4th round - Chuck Johnson, OG, Texas (6-3, 280)
Versatile drive blocker who plays hard and has potential as a pass blocker 
because of his quick feet and good balance...Started at left tackle in 1990
but was in and out of the lineup last season because of a hyperextended knee
and ankle injury, starting only 4 games...Also missed some playing time as
a junior with a sprained knee...scouts like his willingness to work and his 
intelligence...has already been accepted into law school...Kiper: "...the
only factor that could prevent him from reaching his full potential is a lack 
of durability.  If he can stay away from the nicks, you could be looking at
a top flight guard in the NFL."

5th round - Frank Robinson, CB, Boise State (5-10, 174)
3-year starter after walking on...intercepted 6 passes as a junior...finished
the 1991 season with 31 tackles, 8 ints. (4 while playing with a broken hand),
11 pass breakups, and 2 fumble recoveries. 2 of those picks were returned for
TD's...blocked 7 kicks as a junior and returned 19 punts for a 10.1 average 
last season...doesn't have good speed, but has been able to get by with his
tremendous feel for the position...plays the ball in coverage as well as the
highly regarded CB's...coming from Boise State, will remain a Bronco. :^)

7th round - Ron Geater, DL, Iowa (6-5, 272)
Wasn't even considered a draftable prospect at the beginning of the 1991
season, limited solely to duty as a reserve until this season...started first
10 games in '91, recording 84 tackles, 15 takcles for losses and 9 sacks...
has good height, quickness, hustle and activity...made an inordinate number
of tackles for a defensive tackle...came a long way this year, making you
wonder how he would be regarded if he could have started an additional year
or two.

7th round - Jim Johnson, OT, Michigan State (6-5, 300)
Strong, mobile pass protector with quick feet and an aggressive nature...moved
into the starting lineup at right tackle in 1990 and started all year in 1991
...showed his toughness this past season when he played despite operating at
far less than 100% with a stress fracture in his left foot...quick DE's were
able to beat him to the corner, and he also had trouble with any finesse-type
moves by the defender...Will handle straight-ahead bull rushers, since very 
few DL can outslug this guy in the trenches.

7th round - Jon Bostick, WR, Nebraska (6-1, 190)
Big-play, possession-type receiver with outstanding leaping ability...averaged
24.1 yards on 12 catches in '89, 6 for TD's...caught 19 passes for 375 yards
and 4 TD's as a junior and 24 for 419 yards and 5 TD's as a senior...a solid
blocker who can handle return duties...averaged 14.3 yards on 7 punt returns
in 1990.

8th round - Dietrich Lockridge, OG, Jackson State (6-3, 320)
4-year starter at left guard...has some quickness and shows flashes of 
dominance...has the wide body many teams are looking for...Uses his massive 
frame to move defenders with an initial explosion, and holds his own on pass
protection...his weight could be a problem, ballooning up to 330 at times.

9th round - Muhammad Oliver, CB, Oregon (5-10, 170)
Outstanding athlete and terrific jumper who impressed scouts with his 
improvement last season...Missed 5 games because of a knee injury in 1990 but
was a starter in 1991, when he had 53 tackles and 3 interceptions and
returned 15 kickoffs for an 18.1 yard average.

10th round - Bob Meeks, C, Auburn (6-1, 286)
Can play any position on the offensive line...Started at center in every game
the past 2 seasons...hard worker on the field and in the weight room...strong
and tough enough to take on straight-ahead bull rushers, but a super quick
penetrator can get him off balance just enough to blast through on either side. 

11th round - Cedric Tillman, WR, Alcorn State (6-2, 205)
Caught 58 passes for 790 yards and 11 TD's last season...will make the 
acrobatic catch and is not afraid to dive or catch the ball in a crowd...doesn't
have great speed.

12th round - John Granby, S, Virginia Tech (6-1, 200)
Physical, strong player who has good size and awareness..has been a starter
5 seasons at Virginia Tech, but broke his jaw in the 1990 opener and was 
granted a medical hardship...came back in 1991 to record 31 solo tackles and
intercept 4 passes.

36.969COMET::JACKSONTAHangManWed Apr 29 1992 17:0014
      My view:
    
      Maddox -  Jury out for "some" years.
    
      Dronett & Robinson - Kick blockers!!!!!!!  Something Denver hasn't
    had since Louis Wright days!
    
      Jim Johnson - Sounds like great potential! Maybe move to left tackle
    since that denvers main offensive line weekness.
    
      The rest,  we will see!  I'm sure 1/2 of them will be busts-(
    
        Tim
      
36.970USCTR2::NAHEARNWed Apr 29 1992 17:245
    What's the latest on Bobby Humphrey?  Will the Broncos go to training
    camp with him, or continue to look for a taker?
    
    
    Nelly
36.971QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareWed Apr 29 1992 19:377
    Once again the Bronco "Brain Trust" has pulled another boner in 
    the draft.  I can't imagin what the heck could have been goint through
    their respective one brain cell that would have triggered them to
    pick Maddox.  Maybe Gawd (Elway) has told them he's gonna hang `em up
    soon.  It's the only logic I can see to it.
    
    Big Game  (an upset Donks fan...  but what new)
36.972;-)FRETZ::HEISERelectric warrior, acoustic saintWed Apr 29 1992 19:391
    Shame, just when they finally got their own Notes conference too!
36.973QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareWed Apr 29 1992 19:444
    The Donks have their own notes file....  WHERE, WHERE !!
    Someone tell me WHERE !!
    
    BG
36.974MONGUS::BRYDIEThat's when I reach for my revolverWed Apr 29 1992 19:479
  Big Game,
 
  It's SUPERBOWLASSWHIPPING::BRONCOS.


  Hope this helps,
           
  _Tommy
    
36.975QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareWed Apr 29 1992 19:523
    Thats pretty good, Tommy...  
    
    Big Game (whos rolling)
36.976CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownWed Apr 29 1992 19:534
>  It's SUPERBOWLASSWHIPPING::BRONCOS.

Must be one of those new Phase V node names....    

36.977Impressions from Bronco's QB coachOURGNG::RIGGENFree Ivan the terribleWed Apr 29 1992 21:598
Ray Berry "yes fomer Patriot coach" stated that Tommy Maddox has a style 
likened to "JOE WILLIE NAMATH".  


Proof that Reeves lost his only colloe loving live brain cell and hired a guy 
that made a girl out of Tony Eason. 

Jeff
36.9781992 Bronco ScheduleBSS::JCOTANCHThu May 07 1992 15:2631
PRESEASON

Aug. 3    at San Francisco     6 pm
Aug. 8    TAMPA                4 pm
Aug. 15   Miami (at Berlin)    11 am
Aug. 22   at Dallas            6 pm
Aug. 28   PHOENIX              7 pm


REGULAR SEASON 

Sept. 6   LA RAIDERS           6 pm (Sunday night, TNT)
Sept. 13  SAN DIEGO            2 pm
Sept. 20  at Philadelphia      11 am
Sept. 27  at Cleveland         11 am
Oct.  4   KANSAS CITY          2 pm
Oct. 12   at Washington        7 pm (Monday night)
Oct. 18   HOUSTON              2 pm
Oct. 25   at San Diego         2 pm
Nov. 1    Bye
Nov. 8    NY JETS              2 pm
Nov. 15   NY GIANTS            6 pm (Sunday night, ESPN)
Nov. 22   at LA Raiders        2 pm
Nov. 30   at Seattle           7 pm (Monday night)
Dec. 6    DALLAS               2 pm
Dec. 12   at Buffalo           10:30 am (Saturday)
Dec. 20   SEATTLE              2 pm
Dec. 27   at Kansas City       11 am

All times are Mountain

36.979COMET::JACKSONTAHangManThu May 07 1992 21:253
      Could turn into a tough schedule!  Opening day is a must to go too.
    
    	Tim
36.980ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed May 13 1992 13:217
    Hey Tim, how tough would it be to get some tickets for  opening day in
    Broncsville? I think I might've asked about that a few years ago and
    you guy's said it was near impossible to get tickets for a
    Raider/Broncs game, is that still the situation? It would be kinda neat
    to go up and watch the Raiders slap the Doinks around a few times :-)
    
    Carlos
36.981and its not even camp timeCOMET::JACKSONTAHangManWed May 13 1992 13:4114
       Come on Carlos,  the faids haven't slapped around the donks since
    1974.  All games are usually within 5 points no matter who wins.
    
      As to ticket availability,  I'm not sure.  The faids/donks games are
    usually tough to get unless you are only looking for 1-2 tix.   Show up
    1-2 hours before game time.  Scalpers will be out making a buck.  
    
    If you plan on going,  be sure to get seats in the south stands. They
    love faider fans;^   Be sure to wear your silver and black.
    
      Its a long drive back to N.M after your team loses!
    
    	Tim
      
36.982USCTR1::NAHEARNWed May 13 1992 16:586
    Any news from the Bobby Humphrey front?  Will he be on the Broncos'
    roster on September 6th?  If he is still with the team, does he have
    any chance of re-capturing his starting job?
    
    
    Nelly
36.983COMET::JACKSONTAHangManWed May 13 1992 19:5718
      No news on a trade.
    
      My opinion is Reeves will keep him around,  and eventually take the
    starting job back if he isn't the starter come week 1.  He will work
    hard to recover what was lost last year.
    
      Bobby is better than Green IMO.  Green had a good year for being
    behind a mediocre line,  but he falls when touched.  Bobby is more of a
    "power" runner,  which is what Denver will need,  especially with the
    schedule they have this year.
    
      Trading Bobby would be a mistake,  'cause Green may get hurt,  and
    the other backup (his name slips me) is ok,  but thats it.
    
    
      Heres to having Bobby back in as starter!
    
    	Tim
36.984BSS::JCOTANCHThu May 21 1992 16:3513
    Well, fire up the Humphrey trade talk again.  Latest rumor has Bobby
    going to Miami for Sammie Smith and other considerations, probably a
    2nd or 3rd-round draft pick.
    
    Actually, it's being reported as an all-but-done deal, the only problem
    being where to find Bobby.  Nobody has been able to get in touch with
    him, not even his agent.
    
    If the trade does indeed happen, I'm won't be overly thrilled by it,
    mainly because of Smith's fumbling habit.
    
    
    Joe
36.985AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 21 1992 16:385
    	I read where the Donkeys were hesitant to trade Humphrey until
    they got Green signed 'cuz having Bobby around gives them more leverage
    in the contract negotiations.
    
    				/Don
36.986QUASER::JACKSONTAPlayoff boundThu May 21 1992 17:128
      Trading Humphrey for Smith?   What in the ____ do the think their
    doing?  Smith is a fumbler and is not worth the trade,  especially a
    2nd or 3rd round extra!  1st round is a maybe (big) at that.
    
      Smith does good 'cause he has a good offensive line to run behind.  I
    think he wouldn't do as good behind Denver's mediocre line.
    
      Tim
36.987Fire the lot of `em Managment that isQUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareThu May 21 1992 19:064
    Once again the Bronco Brain Trust puts forth a great idea.
    It's Gonna be a long, long year for us Donks fans...
    
    BG
36.988QUASER::JACKSONTAPlayoff boundFri May 22 1992 06:187
     Heard on the local news that the Denver Post stated that Humphrey is
    indeed headed for fishland.  According to channel 9 (Zapolo) that
    Humphrey and his agent have been contacted.  Only thing needing done is
    the inking so Reeves said.  Of course he said nothing is definate (just
    like always).
    
    	Tim
36.989GENRAL::WADEfill yer hands you &lt;CENSORED&gt;!!Fri May 22 1992 12:305
    
    	Stupid trade.  They should have tried to trade for
    	a good left tackle............
    
    Claybone
36.990The rumors continue...BSS::JCOTANCHFri May 22 1992 15:3417
    
>    	Stupid trade.  They should have tried to trade for
>    	a good left tackle............
    
 Speculation in Miami is that Jeff Dellenbach could end up being part of the
Humphrey deal.  Who is Dellenbach, you ask?  Well, he was Miami's starter at
left tackle before the young All-Pro Richmond Webb came along.

Of course, both teams are declining comment on the trade, and Reeves said that
"no deal is imminent."

I think they could use a good back like Smith because Green's durability 
remains a big question.  However, I like the tough running of Greg Lewis and
if Smith comes in how much playing time would Lewis see?


Joe
36.991AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri May 22 1992 15:394
    	They reported this trade as a done deal on NESN this morning.
    Guess I can't believe Amy Stone anymore.
    
    				/Don
36.992QUASER::JACKSONTAPlayoff boundTue May 26 1992 13:596
      So did this trade happen over the weekend?  I wasn't near a TV for 3
    days,  and loving it (kids wear out VCR).
    
    
    
    	Tim
36.993NopeBSS::JCOTANCHTue May 26 1992 14:501
    
36.994Swapping one headcase for another?PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 27 1992 13:4542
From: clarinews@clarinet.com
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc

ARTICLE:

Date: 26 May 92 20:33:08 GMT

	MIAMI (UPI) -- The Miami Dolphins traded fumble-prone running back
Sammie Smith to Denver Tuesday for Bobby Humphrey, the Broncos'
disgruntled ball carrier.
	The Broncos have been trying to trade Humphrey, 25, since last
October when he returned from a 96-day holdout while under contract.
	After rushing for 2,386 yards his first two seasons, Humphrey carried
only 11 times for 33 yards last year while watching Gaston Green become
Denver's top rusher with 1,037 yards.
	Smith, 25, was Miami's top draft pick out of Florida State in 1989,
but lost his starting job to Mark Higgs last season after goal-line
fumbles at crucial moments in losses to Houston and Kansas City. He also
missed much of the season with a knee injury.
	After the fumbles, Dolphin fans began an obscene chant about Smith
that reverberated through Joe Robbie Stadium.
	The Dolphins' interest in Humphrey was made public about a week
before this year's draft, but they seemed to back off when Humphrey
missed two appointments for physical examinations. He eventually took
one in mid-April.
	The Broncos had hoped to get a first-round pick for Huymphrey, but
there were no takers. Humphrey was a first-round supplemental draft
choice from Alabama in 1989.
	The Atlanta Falcons had been considered a serious bidder, but that
deal fell through.
	The Dolphins revived their efforts last week when Charley Winner,
director of player personnel, called Denver Coach Dan Reeves for
permission to talk to Humphrey's agent.
	Humphrey is scheduled to make $450,000 this season but wants more.
Smith is in the final year of his contract, which pays $440,000. Both
had been quoted as saying they would welcome a trade.
	Smith, 6-foot-2 and 230 pounds, rushed for only 297 yards in 1991
because of his knee problems last year. His best year was in 1990 when
he gained 831 yards and finished the season strong. His rookie year in
1989 was hampered by injuries and a long holdout.
	Humphrey, 6-1 and 201 pounds, gained 1,202 yards in 1990 and 1,151
yards as a rookie in 1989.
36.995HYDRA::HAUSRATHCarson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff'Wed May 27 1992 13:595
    
    Great news!    Now Denver can experience "the fumble" at every game 
    without NBC drugging up the past ;-)
    
    /Jeff
36.996PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 27 1992 14:044
36.997DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEWed May 27 1992 14:1716
    Great, if Denver fans approach this as the Broncos get a fumble-prone
    guy, Sammie won't ever reach his full potential. I thought Miami fans
    showed no class at all towards Smith. Playing with that thought in his
    head certainly affected his game.
    
    He fumbled on 2 momentous occasions. So has Dickerson. Did that deserve
    the vicious treatment Smith received?
    
    I would think that Bronco fans, known for their strong support of their
    team, right or wrong, would get behind Sammie and cheer him on.
    Humphrey didn't want to be there...Smith is looking forward to playing
    there. I would think the Orange Masses would embrace the guy and
    encourage him to succeed.
    
    Rich
    
36.998Right back at square 1BSS::JCOTANCHWed May 27 1992 15:1815
    Denver didn't get what they could've for Bobby, but the thing that
    bothers me most about this trade is they got a player at a position
    where they didn't have a need.  With Smith the probably backup and
    relief back to Green, that pretty much leaves Lewis on the bench.  Not
    to mention Sewell.  
    
    Getting someone's 2nd-round draft pick for Humphrey back on draft day
    would've been a much better deal IMO.
    
    As for Smith's well-publicized fumbling problem, that's all everyone is
    talking about and the first time he puts the ball on the ground next
    fall you can be assured the grumblings will begin.
    
    
    Joe
36.999I glad Houston won the game, but I felt sorry for SmithLUNER::BROOKSI'm too sexy for this note ...Wed May 27 1992 15:509
    I think it was a good deal for both teams. Smith is a good back who
    took his problem pretty hard. You have to believe between the classless
    booing of the Dolphin fans, and his own memory, smith got gunshy. A
    change of enviroment is the best thing for him. And I think he is a
    better runner than Humphries.
    
    I hope he has a big year.
    
    Doc
36.10008^)CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed May 27 1992 16:049
    -1,
    Re. classless booing of the Dolphin fans.
    
    Remove booing, the and Dolphin and replace with Miami.
    Then you cover the whole enchilada
    
    HTH,
    MikeL
    
36.1001CNTROL::CHILDS&quot;I'll get briefed up on that&quot; hahahaaaWed May 27 1992 16:127
 Joe, I wouldn't be that sold on Green after just
 one good year. A year that he also couldn't remain
 healthy in.

 mike    

36.1002BSS::JCOTANCHWed May 27 1992 16:4611
    I totally agree that Green's ability to stay healthy is a big question
    mark, but I liked what I saw of Lewis last year.  However, with Smith
    coming in, it's doubtful he'll get a chance to show what he can do as a
    feature back.  
    
    As for Smith, I've always felt that a change of scenery is the best
    thing that can happen to a disguntled player, but it's just that Denver
    doesn't need another running back IMO.
    
     
    Joe
36.1003QUASER::JACKSONTAPlayoff boundWed May 27 1992 17:156
      This was a straight up trade?  What kinda kocka is that?  Miami made
    out!!  Humphrey will have a great year running behind that OL Miami
    has!  As to Smith?  Reeves will probably find a way to screw this up. 
    Actually it sounds like he already did!!!
    
      Tim
36.1004Just inOURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Wed May 27 1992 17:186
Denver is also close to signing a senior citizen Stanley Morgan ???




Stupid stupid Stupid...
36.1005Class = Stanley MorganDCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEWed May 27 1992 17:348
    Stanley Morgan has more knowledge about receiving a football than the
    entire Bronco offensive coaching staff. If you folks out there are
    lucky enough to aquire the Steamer, the positive aspect of his presence
    will rub off on your younger receivers and his leadership and class
    will impress each and every one of you.
    
    Rich
    
36.1006$ .02TULA::CGRIEGOWed May 27 1992 18:3214
    Re .1003  >>Miami made out!!
    
    My thoughts exactly Tim, the doink's management again prove their
    ineptitude. The Broncs definitely got the short end of the stick on
    that trade. Watch for Miami to win the East this year, and maybe even
    make it to the show. [by the way, I don't think that *just* the
    Humphrey trade is their ticket to the show (although it's a big help),
    they also did well in the draftraft, they added Mean Joe to the
    defensive coaching staff, and they addressed some needs via plan b.
    I give them an 'A' for there off season work. On the other hand, watch
    the doinks' running game to be nuthin special, to match the rest of the
    team.
    
    Carlos
36.1007BSS::JCOTANCHWed May 27 1992 19:069
    And just to witness that Miami made out like a bandit in this deal,
    they had a sportscaster from Miami on KOA's show last night and he
    hadn't talked to anyone who wasn't thrilled with the deal the Dolphins
    got.
    
    Also, Reeves even said this wasn't the deal Denver wanted.  
    
    
    Joe
36.1008I'll up that .02QUASER::JACKSONTAPlayoff boundWed May 27 1992 21:2612
      If Reeves didn't want that deal,  then why the h___ did he do it?
    
      Thats a frustration type of question.
    
      As to Stanley Morgan,  if he is so great Rich,  then why did the Pats
    and Jets? let him go?  Isn't he like 100 years old?  He may help in
    coaching,  but not as a player!
    
      Heck the donks could do better with a faider WR, which ain't saying
    much!
    
    	Tim
36.1009CNTROL::CHILDS&quot;I'll get briefed up on that&quot; hahahaaaThu May 28 1992 12:499
 He did cause he wasn't going to get jackshooty out of Bobby with Smith he has
 a chance to get some productivity...

 Morgan is simple the end result of a youth movement by the Pats and Jets. He's
 certainly more talent than anything the Donks have now. He always been able to
 catch the homerun something none of them are capable of. Nattiel was supposed
 to be but DannyBoy's got Nattiel's brains fried....
 
36.1010DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEThu May 28 1992 13:3310
    Tim,
    
    Morgan was making big bucks. Vic was a dullard. Jets going for youth
    movement. BTW - why did Iggles give up on Harold Jackson. New England
    felt he was an antique. He then gave 2-3 very solid, productive years.
    
    BTW - I think Morgan played for the Colts lasted year, not the Jets. 
    
    Rich
    
36.1011FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu May 28 1992 13:539
    Morgan played for us through the 1989, was with the Colts for at least
    1990 and I believe was out of football in 1991.
    
    It's a strange pickup for the Broncos.  Morgan's big asset was always
    his speed and he's lost a lot of that, and he was never really known
    for his courage in going over the middle.  I honestly don't know how
    much he's going to help the Broncos.
    
    John
36.1012They haven't even signed him yet...BSS::JCOTANCHThu May 28 1992 14:037
    I don't think it's a strange pickup at all.  Denver needs help at WR,
    and if they can get a decent year out of Morgan that'd be great.  Kind
    of like the Butch Johnson situation.  But to say that Morgan is better
    than anyone Denver has right is ridiculous...of course, what else did
    ya expect from Childs.  :^)
    
    Joe
36.1013ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu May 28 1992 14:5711
    >>Heck the donks could do better with a faider WR, which ain't saying
    >>much!
    
    C'mon Tim, you can't honestly tell me you wouldn't give your right
    ...ahem... leg to have Tim Brown, or Swervin Mervyn, on the receiving
    end of Mr. Ed's passes, can you???  (I think Gault is over-rated.)
    
    
    Carlos
    
    
36.1014the dealMCIS2::CLAYBROOKThu May 28 1992 15:053
    As a Pats fan, I wish Denver and the Dolphins didn't make the trade.
    
                                                           Dan
36.1015BSS::JCOTANCHThu May 28 1992 16:169
    
>    C'mon Tim, you can't honestly tell me you wouldn't give your right
>    ...ahem... leg to have Tim Brown
    
    Denver doesn't want an undeserving Heisman winner.
    
    
    Joe 
    
36.1016Can't resist can ya Joe? 8^) Tsk TskCTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu May 28 1992 16:361
    
36.1017USCTR1::NAHEARNThu May 28 1992 17:028
    As the owner of Bobby Humphrey's rights in the Ultimate Football
    League, I am very happy with the trade!!  With the Dolphins young and
    talented Offensive line and the need for opposing defenses to
    concentrate on Marino, Humphrey could post some impressive numbers!!
    I wonder if Miami will get him involved in the passing game?
    
    
    Nelly
36.1018Watch for Elway to have good yearQUASER::JACKSONTAAdvanced past 1st round of 'offs!Thu May 28 1992 17:1518
      Fernandez would be it.  Brown is overrated!  He used to be a great
    kick returner,  but that it IMO.
    
      I have always liked Vance Johnson as a player.  He will go over the
    middle.  Actually that is usually where he is more productive IMO. 
    Mark Jackson does his on and off routine that he is average at best. 
    Micheal Young is almost a Steve Largent/Steve Watson clone (reliable). 
    To bad he is hurtin'.
    
      Nattiel (when he was here) was way under utilized.  He had the speed
    and hands,  but could'nt run a good route (except fly) to save the
    teams life.
    
      The other WR that was a rookie last year (forgot his name) has
    potential, but needs to learn how to catch some of those "catchable"
    balls.
    
        Tim
36.1019Elway = Strong Arm, Big Teefes, Avg. Stats, No RingsLUNER::BROOKSI'm too sexy for this note ...Thu May 28 1992 17:436
    re -.1
    
    We've been watching for Elway to have a real All-Pro year for what,
    five years ?
    
    still haven't seen it ....
36.1020USCTR1::NAHEARNThu May 28 1992 19:1116
    I think people have forgotten that Tim Brown had a serious knee injury
    early in his Raider career.  Late last season he began to look like a
    player more confident in his skills and less preoccupied with how his
    knee was holding up.  In fact, it appeared that he and Marinovich had a
    chemistry going for them....one that may translate into big numbers for
    Brown if Todd gets the call from Day 1 of the '92 season.  Brown is an
    outstanding athlete and competitor.....and more than just a kick
    returner (IMHO)!!  I can see Fernandez being the Raiders deep threat
    and Brown being a possession receiver who can get deep and break
    tackles after the catch!!  
    
    He would be a valuable addition to the Broncos receiving corps (threw
    that in to get back to the note's topic!!!)!!!
    
    
    Nelly
36.1021JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu May 28 1992 19:1814
    re .1018:
    
    Rookie WR = Shannon Sharpe?
    
    
    re .1017:
    
    According to a sportscast I saw the day after the trade, yes the
    Dolphins do plan to use Humphrey as a pass receiver more...Shula said
    that was one of the things he likes about Humphrey.
    
                                                                           
    
    py
36.1022QUASER::JACKSONTAAdvanced past 1st round of 'offs!Thu May 28 1992 20:592
      Derek Russell is the rookies name.  I remember!
    	Tim
36.1023BSS::JCOTANCHThu May 28 1992 21:068
    
>    Rookie WR = Shannon Sharpe?
    
    The receiver Tim's referring to is Derek Russell, last year's 4th round
    pick.  Sharpe is used predominantly as an H-back or tight end anymore.
    
    Joe
    
36.1024Just my $.02 QUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareThu May 28 1992 22:1111
    
     I don't think it much matters who the Donks pick up at WR since
    there ain't gonna be no balls coming their way.  Remember,  the 
    Donks Brain Truss picked a QB instead of some offensive line help.
    With that fantanstic move Elway, his back up, and his back ups back
    up will be spending most of their time a$$ and surely won't have any time 
    to be looking down field for Vance, Mark, Shannon, Young or anyother WR
    for that matter.  The Donks blew the draft BIG !!!  Donk Fans,  Look
    forward to a long, disappointing, and injury filled year.
    
    Big Game
36.1025Time will tellQUASER::JACKSONTAAdvanced past 1st round of 'offs!Fri May 29 1992 12:187
      I never thought I would hear Cacti giving up on the season before
    training camp has even started.
    
      you may be right Jack,  but then again, if Elway stays healthy,  I
    think he will do good.
    
    	Tim
36.1026SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jun 11 1992 18:163
       Ex-Patriot Stanley Morgan, 37, has signed with the Donks. And he's
    not even a ex-Cowboy!
                               Denny
36.1027QUASER::JACKSONTABounced out in 2nd round (sigh)Thu Jun 11 1992 21:141
       He is still old
36.1028BSS::JCOTANCHFri Jun 12 1992 13:421
    ...and still fast.
36.10298^)CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Fri Jun 12 1992 13:595
    Yabbut,
    Who'll git the ball to him??
    
    MikeL
    
36.1030Ah, shaddup Leary! :^)BSS::JCOTANCHFri Jun 12 1992 14:031
        
36.1031ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Jun 16 1992 21:384
    Great, now the doinks have a senior citizen WR to go along wif there
    senior citizen QB. I bet the rest of the league is shaking...
    
    Carlos
36.1032Another Orange Crush LB addedQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Tue Jul 07 1992 19:4210
      Tom Jackson will be added to Mile High's Ring of Fame this year. 
    Cerimonies to happen during the home game against KC.
    
      Tom was always one of the most charged up players I have ever
    witnessed.  He did alot for Denver during his career.
    
    
      Congrats,
    
    	Tim
36.1033TRAINING CAMP IS OPEN ?OURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Mon Jul 20 1992 18:2913
Well the AFC west division champion DENVER Bronco's opened camp yesterday with 
only 9 holdouts. 


5 veterans Simon Fletcher,  Ron Holmes, Jeff Davidson...
4 Rookies Tommy MAddox....


John Elway strained a hamstring during windsprints his future with the team is 
questionable.


NOT
36.1034Mr Ed injured!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jul 20 1992 18:392
       I thought they shot lame horses!
                                       Denny
36.1035Don't let the door hit ya on the way out, Summer!BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jul 20 1992 22:3613
> 5 veterans Simon Fletcher,  Ron Holmes, Jeff Davidson...

    Fletcher and Green are the most notable holdouts and they are also
    expected to be the toughest guys to get signed.
    
> 4 Rookies Tommy MAddox....

    Maddox is the only unsigned rookie but he is expected to be signed in
    the next couple of days.
    
    
    Joe
36.1036Waiting for Big Game to spew forth 8^)CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Jul 21 1992 13:199
    Boy is this a oxymoron or what,
    Any OBJECTIVE Broncos supporter out there who cain give the Denver
    media's opinion of Maddox?  Cain he take the Donks to places Mr Ed
    never took 'em before?
    
    
    
    
    
36.1037COBRA::DINSMOREMARLINS, AND SHARKS FEASTTue Jul 21 1992 13:475
    
    He wont take them any further than the normal plane trip :)
    
    dinz
    
36.1038NOTwithstanding the NOTNROPST::MPO12::MCFALLThis is the end of the innocenceTue Jul 21 1992 13:566
>John Elway strained a hamstring during windsprints his future with the team is 
>questionable.

	Folks in these parts have thought him questionable for years :^)

	Jim M
36.1039:-)ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 22 1992 18:167
    Re. last few, I've noticed over the last couple of years that Mr. Ed
    has been sustaining more and more of these little nagging type
    injuries, and they're taking longer and longer to heal. This added to
    the donks terrible offensive line (one of the worst in the AFC) equals
    a not so distant one way trip to the glue factory for bucky. HtH.
    
    Carlos
36.1040updatesQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Jul 27 1992 16:295
      Does anyone have an injury report from camp?  I heard that Sewell got
    hurt and is history for the year...
    
    
      Tim,  who's been on vacation for 2 1/2 weeks......
36.1041BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jul 27 1992 17:3221
    Guess we are overdue for some updates here...
    
    Yea, Sewell broke an ankle in a scrimmage Saturday and will be out for
    about 3 months.  Mr. 3rd down will be sorely missed.
    
    Gaston Green signed yesterday, leavin six unsigned players, all
    veterans.  
    
    Greg Lewis has had a good first week of camp...Sammie Smith hasn't seen
    much action because of a groin pull.
    
    Elway's shoulder is feeling fine after offseason surgery...Pelluer has
    dropped 3 snaps in scrimmages...Shawn Moore has looked pretty good, but
    it really doesn't matter since he won't be around.
    
    Croel is even quicker than he was last year.
    
    First preseason game is a week from tonight at SF.
    
    
    Joe
36.1042Thanks Joe!QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Jul 27 1992 19:171
      Dump Pelluer and keep Moore.....
36.1043Droppin like fliesQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Tue Jul 28 1992 19:0412
      Sewell is now out for the year.  He will be missed!
    
      The Vance tore up a shoulder and is to have an MRI done.  Recieving
    corps are in deep stink.  3-4 years ago, DEnver had some of the best, 
    but with all the injuries and trades,  that has now changed.
    
      Stanley Morgan may now be a started at this rate.  Who is left?
    
      Derek Russell and Mark Jackson.  Young is out for awhile if I
    remember correctly....
    
    	Tim
36.1044Donks = -.500ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Jul 29 1992 16:5813
    >>Stanley Morgan may now be a started at this rate.  Who is left?
    >>Derek Russell and Mark Jackson.  Young is out for awhile if I
    >>remember correctly....
    
    Hey Tim, I think your right about Young...didn't he have back surgery
    in the off season or somthing like that? You guy's also have second
    year man, Shannon Sharpe. I think he's Sterling's younger brother?
    Too bad about Sewage...uhh I mean Sewell, looks like the doinks
    already falling apart at the seams and the season hasn't even started
    yet...
    
    Carlos
     
36.1045QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Jul 29 1992 21:3217
      Shannon Sharpe is in season #3 and is Sterlings brother.
    
      All Denvers more reliable 3rd down players are out,  so it seems.
    
      Micheal Young, Sewell, and the Vance.  The only one left is Biff.
            ^
            ^
        Yes Carlos,  Young had back surgery a few months back.
    
    
       Maybe the donks could pick up that stiff from the faids that used to
    play in Chicago (Gault).  Then again the rookies can play better than
    him;^)
    
       Any other Bronco news?
    
    	Tim
36.1046ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Jul 30 1992 15:3915
    Speaking of that stiff (Gault), the faids are putting the pressure on
    him, and are gonna be expecting alot more production from all of their
    WR's this coming year. "We're looking for production out of our
    receivers," said offensive coordinator Terry Robiskie. "This season we
    plan to get the ball to them more. We have to go back to the '90 season
    where Willie caught about 50 balls and led the team in receiving
    yardage. Mervyn caught 52 balls and led the team in receiving and Tim
    had about 35 catches. Last season we didn't have that ratio. Willie was
    down, Mervyn was down and Ethan Horton led the team. There's nothing
    wrong with Ethan leading, but for the Raiders to win we need to get one
    of those million dollar receivers and let them lead in receiving. This
    year I'm looking for everybody to produce in the receiver category.
    Brown, Gault, Graddy, and Fernandez will have to do the job."
    
    Carlos
36.1047BSS::JCOTANCHThu Jul 30 1992 15:4528
    More bad news as far as receivers go:
    Vance will undergo exploratory surgery this morning on his right
    shoulder.  It's probable that he has a tear in his muscle which would
    put him out for quite a while.  Worst case scenario would be a complete
    tear, which would put him out for a minimum of 3 months.
    
    RE: Young
    He's not expected back anytime soon - he was quoted a few nights ago as
    saying, "it would be a miracle if I was ready for the regular season
    opener."
    
    Carl Pickens would *really* be looking good in a Denver uniform right
    now.
    
    Sammie Smith was examined yesterday to see if his groin pull might be a
    tear instead.  No tear was found, but he still won't play Monday night.
    
    Elway will only play 1 or 2 series Monday night (about 8-12 plays). 
    Pelluer will see extensive action with Moore finishing up.  Maddox
    won't see any action against SF but will get some playing time in the
    2nd and/or 3rd preseason games.
    
    The early opinions out of camp are that the defensive will be great,
    but there are major concerns about the injuries at WR and depth on the
    offensive line.
    
    
    Joe
36.1048Graddy can't catch to goodQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Thu Jul 30 1992 21:4214
      Depth on the offensive line a concern?  I've heard this for the last
    5 years!
    
      WR is a real concern.  RB can be questionable to.  Smith has been
    hurt and Sewell gone.  I don't think Gaston will have the type of year
    that he did last year.  I hope I'm wrong,  but with the heavy defenses
    in the NFC east, he don't stand a chance.  Lewis may get alot of
    playing time.
    
      Does anyone have a list of unsigned players?
    
    	Tim...who doesn't like to waist his money on the local rag just to
    read the sports section.
    
36.1049Donks = 0-1 after Week #1 !ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Jul 31 1992 14:5117
     >>               -< Graddy can't catch to good >-
    
    True, true,....very true, I guess he's another project of uncle Al's.
    They (Belitnekof sp?, and co.) have been working with him though, and I
    expect that he'll either blossom this year, or he'll be gone. Last year
    Graddy only caught something like 5 passes, but in those 5 passes he
    averaged an impressive 32.5 yards/catch. So he has alot of potential if
    they can teach him how to hang on to the ball....but that might be a
    big 'IF'. Because of his blazing speed, he is also a somewhat effective
    return man. Through the years, uncle Al (or should I say 'Hall of
    Fame Al') has had some pretty good success with his little projects.
    A recent example, Ethan Horton, was a former first round RB that was
    cut by the Chiefs only to be converted to a Probowl TE by none other
    than 'HoF Al'. Hopefully, Graddy will be the next success story....
    
    Carlos
     
36.1050PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Fri Jul 31 1992 14:595
36.1051BSS::JCOTANCHFri Jul 31 1992 15:1325
    
    They found that Vance did have a torn muscle up around his shoulder and
    will miss at least half of the regular season.
    
>    RB can be questionable to.  

    Say what???  Yea, Sewell's out, but he was mainly used as a utility
    player/3rd-down specialist/receiver out of the backfield.  And Smith's
    injury is just a groin pull, although this isn't the way he wanted to
    start off in Denver.
    
>      Does anyone have a list of unsigned players?
    
    I think there's 5 left: Ron Holmes, Warren Powers, Jeff Davidson,
    Harvey Salem, and Shannon Sharpe.
    
>    	Tim...who doesn't like to waist his money on the local rag just to
>    read the sports section.
    
    Hey Tim, the Jokezette is a great paper...that is, if you want to get
    your Bronco/Buff news a day late and all you're interested in is
    figure skating and the Calhan Sky Sox.
    
    
    Joe
36.1052reeves gets the denver bootMSBOS::DINSMOREMARLINS, AND SHARKS FEASTFri Jul 31 1992 15:335
    Denver  may win  7  games this year, 3 or  4  by Elways  scrambling..
    
    tough year for denver...
    
    
36.1053QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Fri Jul 31 1992 21:4413
      Like I said,  I hope I'm wrong about Gaston, but time will tell. 
    Smith????  Hopefully this trade works,  but I see Bobby being the
    biggest loss of all, IMO.  Smith has to prove himself to me.  He had a
    good offensive line in Miami.  The fish OL is more pass protection
    oriented,  but still good nonetheless.  Bobby should do great there!
    
    
      RB are who, Green, Lewis, Smith and the 2 FB's Alexander and
    Perryman?  I guess I got spoiled (so to speak) over the last 2-3 years,
    because it took Denver most of the 80's to get good running backs. 
    Winder was ok,  but nothing like Humphrey was/is.
    
      Tim  
36.1054BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 03 1992 16:0832
    The first glorified scrimmage takes place tonight with Denver taking on
    the Niners in SF.  The best part of this game is, it'll pre-empt the
    stupid Olympics.  HA!
    
    Don't expect much out of the offense tonight with Elway only playing a
    series or two.  Pelluer, who is still having a rough camp, will get
    most of the work tonight.
    
    11th-round pick WR Cedric Tillman has been looking good and may have a
    shot at making the team with all the injuries at WR - keep an eye on
    him.  Russell needs to do well in the preseason since he's projected to
    be one of the starting WR's.  Other newcomers to watch are Stanley
    Morgan and Jon Bostick.
    
    Chuck Johnson, the 4th-round pick, will probably start at LT.  He moved
    up to the first team when Frank Pollack strained his back.
    
    Shane Dronett and Kenny Walker will start at the defensive ends with
    Holmes and Powers still holding out.  Dronett has been impressive in
    camp.
    
    David Treadwell will have to face a stiff challenge from Tracy Bennett
    for the place-kicking job.  This battle could go down to the last
    preseason game.
    
    DB Frank Robinson (5th round pick) should get most of the punt/kickoff
    return duties tonight.
    
    The only holdouts remaining are Holmes, Powers, and Harvey Salem.
    
    
    Joe
36.1055Turn out he lights, the parties over.....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 03 1992 16:3122
    >> Hopefully this trade works,  but I see Bobby being the biggest
    >> loss of all, IMO.
    
    I think you're right about Green, and the Humprey trade Tim. The donks
    had in Humphrey, probably the highest quality RB to ever put on a
    bronco uniform, and instead of recognizing this and keeping him happy 
    they dump him off the first chance they get...in exchange for a
    mediocre RB. Brainstorms like this is what will keep the donks from
    taking the next step to greatness, and keep them as just a good team
    IMHO. The donks would have been in a lot better position right now if:
    
    *they woulda kept Humphrey & Green in the backfield.
    
    *get bucky some protection (and I don't mean a condem) on the line.
    
    *and maybe go after a WR (although there was no way for them to forsee
     the Vance gettin injured) or a quality TE.
    
    Maybe they can teach Maddox to block, or catch some balls....?
    
    Carlos
     
36.1056QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 03 1992 16:3421
      Doesn't Holmes hold out about every year?  As to Salem holding out, 
    to me he hasn't shown that he deserves more pay.
    
      If whomever plays left tackle well this year,  then the Broncos
    offense may be better than predicted.  Healthy Elway = good offensive
    season....
    
      Montana will not play from what I've heard.  I thought his elbow was
    100%?   
    
      Pelluer is a slug!  I wouldn't mind seeing Moore or Maddix,  which I
    heard Maddix won't play.
    
    
      Joe,  where are you getting the camp reports for performance?  I hope
    its not Ralph Rotten...
    
      It would be nice to see a new DB come on strong and replace Wyman at
    CB.
    
    	Tim
36.1057BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 03 1992 18:4021
    
>    *and maybe go after a WR (although there was no way for them to forsee
>     the Vance gettin injured) or a quality TE.
    
    True, there was no way they could foresee the injuries to Young, Vance,
    and Sewell, but they also couldn't have been less prepared to deal with
    this rash of injuries.  As for TE, that position is actually pretty
    strong with Kay, Awalt, Reggie Johnson, and Sharpe.
    
    No, Tim, I'm not getting my reports from Rotten.  Hell, I'd believe
    Carlos before I'd believe him.  :^)
    
    BTW, speaking of camp performance reports, Wymon is having a good camp
    while Braxton is having a great camp.
    
    Montana won't play tonight because his arm is still bothering him. 
    Maddox isn't expected to play either.
    
    
    Joe
      
36.1058Is tonight's game being telervized?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 03 1992 20:1115
    >> No, Tim, I'm not getting my reports from Rotten.  Hell, I'd 
    >> believe Carlos before I'd believe him.  :^)
    
    Hey thanks alot Joe....
    
    >> As for TE, that position is actually pretty strong with Kay, Awalt,
    >> Reggie Johnson, and Sharpe.
    
    These dudes are more the blocking type of TE's though aren't they?
    I was thinking more along the lines of Pittsburgh's Green, or the
    Raider's Horton type of TE. The kind that's a better receiver than
    blocker. They coulda traded up for Brown, or that other kid I think the
    Jets got.
    
    Carlos
36.1059BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 03 1992 20:5522
>                    -< Is tonight's game being telervized? >-

    Only up here in Colorado.  It's not national, if that's what you're
    asking.  Anyone who's watching the game might want to turn down the
    sound and listen to the radio because Hank Stram will be doing the
    color on the radio.  Stram will be doing the color on the radio for 4
    of the 5 Bronco preseason games because the normal color guy, Dave
    Logan, will be doing the color for the TV broadcast.  Not to take
    anything from Logan, because I really like his work, but Stram is
    excellent IMO.  He does color for CBS radio on Monday night games.
    
>    >> As for TE, that position is actually pretty strong with Kay, Awalt,
>    >> Reggie Johnson, and Sharpe.
    
>    These dudes are more the blocking type of TE's though aren't they?
 
    Kay and Johnson are more of the blocking type, but Awalt was a good
    receiver in Dallas before Novacek came along and Sharpe is a converted
    WR.
    
    
    Joe
36.1060QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 03 1992 20:5713
      Tonights game is on the local FOX station.
    
    
      As to Rotten,  I was just razzin'....
    
    
      I was just informed by the wife that I now have plans fur
    tonight..O'well,  maybe I can tape it though it probably won't be worth
    watching seeing how it don't count and I will probably know the score
    by the time I get home!  Then again seeing the rookies play would be
    good.  Decisions decisions
    
    	Tj
36.1061QuarterbackCOMET::FARMERTue Aug 04 1992 04:243
    Did Pelleur (Sp) play as badly as I have Heard? And did Elway play at
    all? Just wondering.
    
36.1062Only 4 more of these to go...BSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 04 1992 16:4066
Pretty much as expected last night, with the offenses struggling in a 
low-scoring game.  Denver's mistakes came in the form of fumbles (although 
their lone penalty was a crucial one, putting SF in field goal range right
before the half) while SF's came in the form of penalties.  The 1st-team
defense looked pretty good but not great, getting good pressure on Young but
they also left some good holes over the middle for SF's receivers.  SF's 
short passing game sure is good, Montana or no Montana.  The 1st-team offense, 
although not complete with Elway sitting out, looked fair at best.  They got
a couple first downs and gave the QB's okay protection, but Pelluer was off
the mark all night and in a preseason game this early they're never in long
enough to get into a rhythm.


Players who impressed:

Shawn Moore - He was presumed to be as good as gone, but scrambled and threw
the ball well last night.  However, he has still never taken a snap in a 
regular season game and there's alot of preseason left where he must continue
to prove himself.

Greg Lewis - Kind of a bittersweet game for Greg.  He had 2 fumbles and only
averaged 3.4 yards a carry, but he ran hard and had a beautiful move on his
TD reception.  Also showed great effort on that 4th and 1 conversion when he
basically got the first down on his own after being hit at the line of 
scrimmage.  He caught 3 passes.

Stanley Morgan - Caught every ball thrown his way.  Had 4 catches for 46 yards.

Mark Jackson - Had 3 catches, but was also wide open 3 or 4 times when 
Pelluer didn't get the ball anywhere near him.

Mecklenberg - 3 sacks, plus a few QB pressures.

Dronett - Didn't get any sacks, but was putting some good pressure on.

Keith Traylor - Seemed to be all over the place; had 9 solo tackles.

Frank Robinson - Showed some positive signs returning punts and kickoffs.  Made
one big mistake by letting a punt go over his head, but that's what the 
preseason's for.



Players who didn't impress:

Pelluer - Showed some poise, but was off the mark all night.  The backup job
may be his to lose, but he'll need to get sharper with Moore playing that well.

Derek Russell - Had one thrown to him late in the game that he probably 
should've caught.  The fact that he didn't have many thrown his way tells me
he's not doing a very good job of getting open.


The battle for the kicking job never got going because they didn't get any 
field goal attempts.  Bennett did have one kickoff that went inside the 5.

I wanted to see Hagan get some more attempts returning punts but most of them
were kicked out of bounds.  The couple he did catch the Broncos had good 
coverage.

For SF, I thought Amp Lee looked real good.  Wasn't too impressed with Watters.



Joe

36.1063ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Aug 04 1992 17:1920
    
    
    Have
    
    the
    
    donks
    
    ever
    
    won
    
    an
    
    NFL
    
    Championship
    
    ?????????
    
36.1064:-)ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 04 1992 18:349
    Are
    
    You
    
    Kidding!
    
    Shouldn't these be posted in the Jokes topic...
    
    Carlos
36.1065ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Aug 04 1992 18:3724
    
    
    I
    
    thought
    
    this
    
    was
    
    the
    
    jokes
    
    topic...?
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Did you actually hit return enough times to get to this point?
36.1066GENRAL::WADEfill yer hands you &lt;CENSORED&gt;!!Tue Aug 04 1992 19:258
    
    	Hold on there WATERboy, er, I mean iceMan.  Tain't the regular
    	season yet!  We Bronco fans aren't awake yet.........
    
    	BTW, what is the Brownies record against the Donks in AFC
    	champeenship games? :*)
    
    Claybone
36.1067Nyah!SHALOT::MEDVIDthere is really no-one leftTue Aug 04 1992 19:504
>    Did you actually hit return enough times to get to this point?
    
    No.  So there.
    
36.1068Yapping after 1st pre-season gameQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Tue Aug 04 1992 21:245
      Iceman will be put on ice come regular season.   He will dissapear
    after week 6.  He won't be able to stand the ridicule (sp?) that the
    brownies fans will have coming.
    
      Tim
36.1069QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Thu Aug 06 1992 14:548
      Another Bronco WR goes down.  Some rookie who's name slips me has a
    seperated shoulder.  Kay has a bruised knee and Pollack (sp?) OT was
    sent home because he needed to many pain killers to play.
    
      With all these people going down,  I'm wondering if the defense is
    hitting that hard or if its bad luck?
    
       Tim
36.1070BSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 06 1992 16:3813
    The rookie WR that got hurt is Harold Robinson - he wouldn't have made
    the team anyway.
    
    Kay will be out for a month, max, and that's only if he needs
    arthroscopic surgery.
    
    Smith is still bothered by that groin pull.
    
    Moore will come in after Elway and will get some work with the first
    team Saturday.
    
    
    Joe
36.1071QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Thu Aug 06 1992 20:571
      What time is the game sat?
36.10724pmBSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 06 1992 22:104
    Don't ask me why it's so damm early.  However, the players said it's
    fine with them because they're leaving for Berlin Sunday morning.
    
    Joe
36.1073Go BroncosBSS::BSORENSONThe BattlerThu Aug 06 1992 22:384
    What's wrong with the game starting at 4pm on Saturday?  Doesn't your
    wife let you have a beer that early? 
    
    B_Bob
36.1074Go back to sleep, SorensonBSS::JCOTANCHFri Aug 07 1992 14:561
    
36.1075QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 10 1992 14:4212
      I saw the 1st half and some of the 2nd.
    
      Elway's arm looks great!  I will be suprised if Shawn Moore doesn't
    make the #2 QB.  I won't be suprised if Reeves keeps Pelluer just
    because its Dan Reeves we are talking about,  not to mention Pelluer is
    an ex-Cowboy.
    
      What can you say about Atwater....DEfense will be good again,  but
    still needs that impact DE.
    
      Tim
                       
36.1076BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 10 1992 17:0936
    
>      What can you say about Atwater....DEfense will be good again,  but
>    still needs that impact DE.
    
The defense should be very good, and the linebacking quartet should be among
the league's best.  One of the few down points of the defense is that most of 
the pressure is coming from the linebackers and not the linemen.  The have a
couple good young linemen in Walker and Dronett and a promising free agent 
in Mark Flythe.  Holmes signed over the weekend just in time to make the trip
to Berlin, leaving Powers as the only holdout left.

More on the 2nd glorified scrimmage:
Elway looked very sharp...It's starting to look like Jackson will be Elway's 
main go-to receiver...Moore continues to impress as the backup. He has great
mobility and has been pretty accurate, but maybe most importantly has shown
good poise back in the pocket...Robinson appears on his way to nailing down
a roster spot with some good returns.  Free-agent Arthur Marshall also got a
few returns but I don't think he has much of a chance...Elway got pretty good
pass protection from the first-team OL.

There were also some bad points:
Lewis looks good when he runs the ball, but had another fumble.  He didn't play
after that fumble because of a bruised hand he suffered in the SF game, which
he said was the reason he fumbled.  Regardless, if he keeps putting the ball on
the ground, he'll see plenty of pine time this fall...Pelluer is quickly 
playing himself off the team, and may already be too far behind in the backup
race to take over Shawn Moore, especially when you consider that he may not 
see much playing time because Reeves will start giving some time to Maddox.
Pelluer had 2 fumbles against Tampa...The running game hasn't done much - Denver
averaged less than 3 yards a rush the other night...Russell dropped a couple
catchable balls, and then suffered some bruised ribs, but it isn't expected to
be serious...Kay will have arthroscopic surgery done on his knee and will be
out about 3-4 weeks.


Joe
36.1077CUT "P" MAN.....CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYMon Aug 10 1992 19:137
    
    Hey Joe, Shawn Moore is looking better every game...Danny Boy would
    be crazy to cut him and stupid not have him to have him play behind
    the " P " man (steve pelluer).
    
    
    Drewski 
36.1078donks = 0-1 after week 1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 11 1992 17:0115
    >> The defense should be very good, and the linebacking quartet
    >> should be among the league's best.
    
    Sorry Joe, but I'm gonna have to dis-agree. I'll give you that the
    donk's LB's are good, but not among the leagues best. I know that
    you'll proberly point me to lasted years stats to try and prove your
    point, but the only problem there is that the donks only played three
    teams (regular season) that were above .500 . That kind of schedule
    will make any average defense look great. This year will be a better
    indicator of just how tough their defense is.....
    
    Anyhow, I don't think Denver's LBs are in the same class as N.O.'s, or
    K.C.'s, Giants, Eagles......etc...
    
    Carlopski 
36.1079BSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 11 1992 18:0322
    
>    Anyhow, I don't think Denver's LBs are in the same class as N.O.'s, or
>    K.C.'s, Giants, Eagles......etc...
    
What I meant about the 'backers being "among the league's best" is not that 
they *are* the league's best, but definitely in the top 4 or 5.  I'll give ya
that NO's are better, even though a couple of their guys are getting up there
in age.  And even though LT has lost a little bit off his game, the Giants'
'backers are slightly better too.  But I don't think the Eagles have anything
on Denver because remember we're only taking about a group of 3 and that with
that great defensive line it's easy for the LB's to look good.  And I'll flat-
out say that Denver has a better group than KC.  Okay, they may have the
best outside LB in the game with Derrick Thomas, but after him it's pretty 
average.  

Fletcher had 13.5 sacks last year and is already 2nd on the Broncos all-time
sack list.  He's one of the league's most underrated players.  Brooks does a
superb job against the run on the inside, but is playing in the shadow of 
Mecklenberg.  And Croel is one of the league's rising stars.


Joe
36.1080ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 11 1992 18:4521
    >> What I meant about the 'backers being "among the league's best"
    >> is not that they *are* the league's best, 
    
    Ok, I got it the first time, but I still disagree...
    
    >> but definitely in the top 4 or 5.
    
    Get out! I'd be interested to know which are the three or four that you
    think are better. IMHO, the: Bills, Chiefs (again), Chargers, Skins,
    Eagles, Giants, Cardinals, Lions, Saints, and 49'ers are all as good or
    better than the donks with regards to LBs.
    
    As far as the comparison between the donks and the chiefs, I know I'd
    much rather have Thomas than Fletcher, and Percy Snow is at least as
    good as Brooks against the run (although he was out last year with an
    ankle injury), and Croel does have a bright future, but right now he's
    not much better than average.
    
    Carlopski
    
    
36.1081QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Tue Aug 11 1992 19:543
      Cards, Lions, Chargers, 9'rs?
    
      Carlos Carlos,  your in envy....
36.1082This is getting ridiculous...BSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 11 1992 19:5615
>    IMHO, the: Bills, Chiefs (again), Chargers, Skins,
>    Eagles, Giants, Cardinals, Lions, Saints, and 49'ers are all as good or
>    better than the donks with regards to LBs.
    
>    Croel does have a bright future, but right now he's
>    not much better than average.
    
With statements like these, it's quite apparent to me that you just don't 
*want* to believe that the Denver 'backers are that good.  Believe what you
want - hell, you still think Schroeder can take the Raiders to the SB.


Joe

    
36.1083WHO IS THE BEST SET OF LB'S ???CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYTue Aug 11 1992 20:1413
    
    
    Can you guys name the top LB's, starting with the team then the 
    players.  I can't really think of to many teams that have 3 or 4 top
    LB's playing together really tough. The last team to accomplish that was 
    the Bears.
    
    I must say that Meck, Croel, Fletcher, Brooks, are definately in the 
    top 3 if not the best IMO.
    
    
    Drewski
    
36.1084When I count to 3, you will be un-hypnotyzed..1...2..ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Aug 11 1992 21:4442
    >> Carlos Carlos,  your in envy....
    
    Nah Tim, really I'm not, I even said that the donk LB's were good.
    Pardon me if I ain't swallowing all that donk propaganda stuff they've
    been feeding you guy's up there, but I just happen to think that there
    are other teams with LB's that are *at LEAST* as good as the donkey
    ones. You guys act like if they're the Saints' LB'ers just cause they
    had a good year last year. But you guys keep forgettin they had a very
    weak schedule, and if you think they'll have it near as easy this year
    your cracked.
    
    IMHO, out of the four LB's mentioned: Meck, Fletch, Brooks, & Croel.
    Meck is a shadow of his former self, and at this point in his career
    he's not much better than an average LB'er. Croel is just the opposite,
    he's young and aggressive, (and he'll proberly be one of the best in a
    couple of years) but for now he has a limited grasp of his role, and is
    also limited in his technique...again not much better than average. The
    two remaining, Fletch & Brooks, are definitely the class of their unit,
    and are above average, and if I were on a steady diet of donky prop
    I'd proberly think they were the best in the league too, but I'm not,
    and I don't. Now then, since I think that these two knuckle-heads are
    the class of the unit, and I think that most teams have LB's that can
    play at the level of Croel & Meck, I'll just compare Fletch and Brooks
    to the class of some other teams LB'er units I've already mentioned.
    
    S.F. Tim Harris & Charles Haley.....at least as good if not better
    S.D. Leslie O'Neil & Junior Seau .."                              "
    Buf. Cornelius Bennett & Darly Talley"                            "
    K.C. Derrick Thomas & Percy Snow..."                              "
    Skins Wilber Marshall & Andre Collins."                           "
    Phil Seth Joyner & Byron Evans ......."                           "
    Giants L.T. & Carl Banks.............."                           "
    Cards Freddie Joe Nunn & Ken Harvey..."                           "
    Lions Chris Spielman & George Jamison."                           "
    Saints..the worst two from this unit are"                         "
    
    HtH
    
    Carlopski
    
    
    
36.1085exQUASER::HUNTERTwo JaKes... Your Worst NightmareTue Aug 11 1992 22:198
    
     AHHHHH YES !!!  Looks like the Donks are off to yet another brilliant
    season.  Looking for the Donks to take the AFC this year and Crush the
    NFC in the STUPIDbowl...  
    
    Big Game (Who Could Be Looking For A Long Time)
    
    
36.1086Change that P_name BGQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Aug 12 1992 14:5227
      Well Cacti,  good to see you noting again!
    
      As to LB's,  I don't think they are the best, but do qualify to be
    towards the top!  Meck is in his last year IMO,  so look for him to be
    a man on a mission this year.  Croel will shine barring injuries.
    Fletcher will do what he has the last 2-3 years. Brooks has the
    potential,  but is slow on pass coverage.
    
      The safety's are two of the best.  The only safety that might/is
    better than Atwater is Lott.  Dennis Smith is within the top 5-6.
    
      And all of this will be determined I guess.
    
      IMO,  I don't think all these NFC teams have really potent offenses, 
    but they do have the defenses.  The skins might be the exception to
    that rule.  The Broncos don't play the 9'rs whom we know what they
    have, even without Joe.
    
      Denver vs potent offenses = Skins, oilers, bills.  Maybe Dallas and
    philly depending on aikman and hershal,  but not likely.
    
      The other teams have mediocr - average offenses at best IMO.
    
    
    	Tim
    
    
36.1087BSS::JCOTANCHWed Aug 12 1992 15:0935
>    You guys act like if they're the Saints' LB'ers just cause they
>    had a good year last year. 
    
Not one person in here has called them the Saints' 'backers.  I even said the
Saints have a better group.  And *you* are the one who keeps pointing to last
year and the weak schedule.  For one thing Croel has only been around one year,
pal.  Fletcher has 56 career sacks (and is 5th on the Broncos' all-time sack
list, not 2nd as I previously stated), and over the past 2 seasons only Pat 
Swilling and Derrick Thomas have more sacks among linebackers.

>    Meck is a shadow of his former self, and at this point in his career
>    he's not much better than an average LB'er. Croel is just the opposite,
>    he's young and aggressive, (and he'll proberly be one of the best in a
>    couple of years) but for now he has a limited grasp of his role, and is
>    also limited in his technique...again not much better than average. 

Here's where your argument really falls apart, saying that Meck and Croel are
just a little better than average.  Meck had 3 sacks in less than a half of 
action against SF and oh, by the way, Croel was defensive rookie of the year
last season (since you seem to have forgotten).


Back at camp in Berlin:

Holmes showed up totally out of shape and was placed on the "Player unable to
perform" list for a couple of weeks.

Maddox will get some time this week and Pelluer will get little or no time.

Smith is still being bothered by that groin pull.    
    

Joe
    
    
36.1088QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Aug 12 1992 16:2715
      It looks like the Smith trade is even worse than I thought.  I hope
    he gets over this groin problem so he can show us his worth.
    
      I'm not a bit suprised about Holmes.  He did this 2-3 years ago when
    he 1st came from Tampa.   This is one point of mine when it comes to no
    justification for more $$$.  He sits out, gets more $$$ just to sit out
    because he was lazy.  Don't look for a good year out of him.  DAnny
    will sit him on the bench,  and I wouldn't be suprised to see him outta
    here this year or before next years start.
    
      The defense will be tested this weekend.  Marino and company
    are about as good as any offense in the league, especially passing!!!
    Will Wymon be burned?  Probably.
    
      Tim
36.1089QUASER::HUNTERA Horse Is A Horse Of Course Of CourseThu Aug 13 1992 14:221
    Hows this Tim !!
36.1090QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Thu Aug 13 1992 16:056
      BG,  I didn't know you watched Mr. Ed on Nick @nite.....
    
      Are going to the opener?   I'm trying to get tix,  but might have to
    scalp it
    
    	Tim
36.1091ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 13 1992 16:096
    >> Are going to the opener? 
    
    Wish I was....
    
    Carlitos
    
36.1092Broncos and Dallas in the SB this year !!QUASER::HUNTERA Horse Is A Horse Of Course Of CourseThu Aug 13 1992 18:3711
    Already got 4, TJ...  In FACK(tm) I might have 2 extra.  A buddy 
    of mine (yea I've got one friend) is coming out from Wisc. on vacation
    right about that time so I have to wait to hear from him weather
    he'll be here out not.  If he's a no show I'll let ya know.  
    
    P.s. Only paid 20 a ticket for second deck 30 yrd line seats in the
         closed end on the sunny side...  YOU GOTTA LOVE IT !!  I'll sell
         ya the extras (if they are) for lets say 45 or 50 bucks ;^)
    	 No...  I'll give em to ya for cost.
    
    BG
36.1093ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Aug 13 1992 18:4210
    >>  -< Broncos and Dallas in the SB this year !! >-
    
    Heaven help us if that happens. That means a Dallas SB championship and
    I can't think of too many things in football that are as insufferable as
    that.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    
36.1094Sounds good Jack!QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Thu Aug 13 1992 18:534
      Carlos,  its a long drive to watch yur faiders lose.
    
    
      Tim
36.1095exQUASER::HUNTERA Horse Is A Horse Of Course Of CourseThu Aug 13 1992 18:563
    Good line TJ...  It is an awfal long drive !!
    
    BG
36.1096ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 13 1992 19:5411
    Yeah but, it's only about an hour as the vulture flies, and there ought
    to be plenty of vultures there after the game picking up the bronco
    scraps that the Raiders leave behind. :-)
    
    Seriously though, I've been noting with you guys for about five years
    now, and you all ain't had the common curtesy to invite me up there
    (all expenses paid, of course), to witness your expressionless faces
    after the romps! What gives? :-)
    
    Curly Toes
    
36.1097dial 1-800-cry-wagh ;^)QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Thu Aug 13 1992 22:0418
      Romps?   20-17,  27-24,  12-9, 7-6, etc...I wouldn't call those romps,
    and the Broncos will only win this 1st game by less than 7 if history
    repeats.
    
      Sure come on up NO EXPENSES PAID!  I'm hoping to save enough before
    then to take at least me and the wifey.  Depending on tix prices,  it
    usually costs about $100 bucks for 2 people after paying for beer, gas,
    beer, tickets, food, & more beer and I'm the only one drinkin the beer.
    
      I think I have the above in order except the food is optional (as
    needed).  I heard face value for "none 50 yard line 1st level tickets"
    are running at $35 a pop.  Does that sound right Cacti?
    
      We will probably take a faider fan with us, even though the last 2
    years that he has gone to faids-donks game,  the donks have lost at home.
    
      
        Tim
36.1098tids and bitsQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 17 1992 15:4516
      What an ugly game Sat vs the fish.  Of course that is what pre-season
    is all about!
    
      #1 defense unit looked good.  Picked off Marino 3x.  Smith gave
    Humphrey a cheap shot.
    
      Denver needs a running game!
    
      Maddox looked like Elway did in his 1st game,  but once Miami quit
    blitzing and he completed his 1st couple of passes,  he seemed to do
    ok.  Drove down for 2 tds,  but he also helped Miami score 3x in the
    3rd qtr.
    
      Time will tell,  but he may very good.
    
    	Tim
36.1099USCTR1::NAHEARNMon Aug 17 1992 17:487
    I didn't see the game.....could you describe the cheap shot by Smith?
    
    I did happen to catch a replay of Humphrey getting his ribs wrapped....
    how did the injury come to pass....and is he healthy?
    
    
    Nelly
36.1100BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 17 1992 18:1940
>      What an ugly game Sat vs the fish.  Of course that is what pre-season
>    is all about!

I don't think they get much uglier than that.  10 turnovers and 16 penalties 
between the 2 teams...Ouch!  The first-team offense had a familiar problem
again - the inability to get 6 when they're in scoring position, although
much of that was due to their penalties and turnovers.  It was quite obvious
that Denver wanted to work on the running game and it showed slight improvement,
but it's still not close to where it should be for Sept. 6th.  Mark Jackson
continues to look good and Russell finally came alive, while Awalt has
disappeared the past 2 games.  Moore looked good again, but hurt his left 
shoulder and they should find out how serious it is today.  Lanier got hurt
also (foot) and it was at first thought to be a broken bone, but now they're 
saying it's probably only a sprain.  Talk about a position they can't afford an
injury.  Reggie Rivers may be working his way onto the roster as Sewell's
replacement.  He's been effective as a receiver/safety valve out of the 
backfield and occasionally running the ball, with most of his work coming on
3rd downs.

Defense continues to look good as Tim said, and all Miami's scoring came against
backups or a mix of starters and backups.

Treadwell's job appears to be safe.
    
>       Maddox looked like Elway did in his 1st game,  but once Miami quit
>    blitzing and he completed his 1st couple of passes,  he seemed to do
>    ok.  Drove down for 2 tds,  but he also helped Miami score 3x in the
>    3rd qtr.

The thing that impressed me most about this kid is the way he settled down after
that horrendous start.  After a few sacks, 2 fumbles, and an interception you'd
think he would totally lose confidence but he came back nicely.  I noticed on 
his 2nd or 3rd series, he was under great pressure and was running up out of the
pocket but still had the alertness to spot an open receiver over the middle.
He throws a nice-looking ball, but was off target quite a few times and tried
to force it in where he couldn't.  He has nice touch on the ball.  He'll need
some time but he's got plenty of that.
    

Joe
36.1101(Is this real or lumor )CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYMon Aug 17 1992 19:586
    I got word that Denver is trying to make a deal with the 9ers for Rice.
    something like sammie smith and keith traylor plus a draft pick.
    Any Truth to this rumor.
    
    
    Drewski
36.1102QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 17 1992 20:364
      1st I heard of it.   $15mil is alot of money for a wide reciever,  or
    anyone for that matter.  At 1st I thought it was a baseball contract.
    
    	Tim
36.1103BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 17 1992 20:373
    It'd take more than Smith and Traylor to get Rice, that's for sure.
    
    Joe
36.1104Is He worth it???CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYMon Aug 17 1992 20:534
    I think the question is Rice worth it and would he be the impac player
    the Broncos need.
    
    Drewski
36.1105I smell toast !!!SHALOT::HUNTHeartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay GinMon Aug 17 1992 21:106
36.1106pelluer gone....CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYTue Aug 18 1992 18:516
    
    Just got word that the Broncos cut pelluer and 5 other players.
    
    
    
    Drewski
36.1107QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Aug 19 1992 16:5714
      Pelleur is gone,  no suprise,  but then again he was a cowboy.
    
      The only other 1/2 name was Mark Murray LB.  He showed potential, but
    never really got ontrack.
    
      Does anyone have what the projected return dates are for the
    following people?
    
      Mike Young, Vance, Moore,  Kay, Lanier & any other top player that I
    may have forgotten.
    
    thx
    
    	Tim
36.1108Smith vs. HumphreyBSS::BSORENSONThe BattlerWed Aug 19 1992 17:2711
    
    This is how it happened:
    
    It was Humphrey's second carry and he went through the middle.  Brooks
    grabbed him and was taking him down by waist and legs.  Before Humphrey
    was down, Dennis flew head first into Bobby's ribs.  Dennis came out of
    it with a slight concussion and a jammed neck.  He told the reporters
    that it was not a cheap shot.  "Bobby wasn't down when I hit him," 
    Smith said.  Humphrey accused Smith of being a "headhunter."
    
    B_Bob  
36.1109BSS::JCOTANCHWed Aug 19 1992 18:2920
>      Does anyone have what the projected return dates are for the
>    following people?
>    
>      Mike Young, Vance, Moore,  Kay, Lanier & any other top player that I
>    may have forgotten.
    
Young - Projected to be ready for the 3rd or 4th game.
Vance - Not sure, but I think it's about midseason.
Moore - Slight separation of his left shoulder, might play in the final 
preason game.
Kay - Might be ready for the season opener.
Lanier - Wasn't serious, might be ready for the Team of the 90's on Saturday.

Others:
Dennis Smith - Wasn't serious, will be back practicing in the next few days (or
is already).
Sammie Smith - Took part in full practice yesterday, might play Saturday.


Joe
36.1110ELMAGO::CGRIEGOWed Aug 19 1992 18:326
    >> Kay - Might be ready for the season opener.
    
    Doesn't really matter, seeing as how they're gonna lose it anyway! :-)
    
    Curly Toes
    
36.1111QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Aug 19 1992 18:571
      Tanks Joe!
36.1112BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 24 1992 16:2723
Well, the Broncos are already starting to hit midseason form - i.e., the 
offense is looking stagnant and making mistakes when they get down near the
opponent's goal line.  Elway had 2 interceptions and both were badly thrown 
balls, especially the 2nd one.  Green broke free and showed his speed in 
running for a 60-yard touchdown but that was called back by a holding penalty.
Smith looked fair at best, and when he did get off a nice run late in the game
he fumbled at the end of it.  Maddox continues to look like the rookie that he
is but he isn't getting much time playing behind the 2nd-team offensive line.
Still, he needs to do a better job of getting rid of the ball sooner.

First-unit defense gave up their first TD of the preseason but still looks very
tough.  They missed numerous opportunities at interceptions.  The thing that 
bothers me most about the defense is even though they've gotten some decent 
pressure on the QB's, they haven't had any sacks since the first game.

On to the positives.  Looks like free-agent WR Arthur Marshall has himself a 
spot on this team.  He had 6 catches the other night and looks good doing the 
return duties.  Alton Montgomery laid some serious hits and was all over the
place - I think he was in on every play on Dallas last drive in the 3rd quarter.
Russell caught 7 balls and showed some nice moves after the catch.


Joe
36.1113Dallas 1 Denver -1 |DIFFERENCE| = 2BSS::G_HEDRICKHangin' in there!Mon Aug 24 1992 17:176
    re. -1
    
    Broncos looked normal as far as I could tell.  Gonna be hard to beat
    them pokes this year!!
    
    TEX
36.1114Maddox just needs more timeQUASER::JACKSONTANot sitting and waiting, but wonderingMon Aug 24 1992 17:2028
      re-1 
    
      Agree with ya Joe.  I caught most of the game,  and the 1st offense
    better get it together!  The 1st string defense won't be able to play
    great all year if they end up being on the field more than not!
    
      Elway looked lost.  It looked like his out of every 4-5 games "bad game"
    that he has been known to have.  The offesnive line needs to find their
    run blocking.  Pass blocking has been good (1st string).  Give Reggie
    Rivers the start at RB next.   He has shown more potential this year
    than Green has.
    
      Smith looked ok,  but did fumble after a 13 yard run.  Isn't that why
    Miami wanted to dump him?  Hope he still works out,  but don't count on
    it.
    
      Wymon was back to old form when it came to covering(not) a good
    reciever.
    
      Is Montgomery Smith's or Atwaters backup?  He looked good!
    
      Like I said and you basically have re-iderated(sp?) is Denver still
    needs an impact defensive lineman like Reggie White or Bruce Smith. 
    That would about complete Denvers defense.
    
      Still need a OLT!!!!!!!!!
    
    	Tim
36.1115ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 24 1992 17:2610
    >> Denver still needs an impact defensive lineman..
    
    How 'bout the fridge. Actually, I'd like the Raiders to pick him up,
    can you imagine McGlokton and the fridge on the same team? Talk abouit
    collapsed lines...
    
    By the way, it looked like somebody put Elway in Schroeders uniform
    this weekend....:-)
    
    Carlos
36.1116Ink wired mines deen to wonkCSC32::J_HERNANDEZRunning With The Devil (dog)Tue Aug 25 1992 16:011
    Who's starting at RB? 
36.1117GreenBSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 25 1992 16:391
    
36.1118BSS::JCOTANCHTue Aug 25 1992 17:5611
    Most of the Bronco cuts yesterday were rookie free-agents, but among
    the notables were Harvey Salem, 7th-round pick Jon Bostick, kicker Tracy
    Bennett, and punter Daren Parker.
    
    There is speculation that rookie free-agent Russell Freeman will move
    in at left tackle and Jeff Davidson will move ahead of Sean Farrell at
    left guard.  Hope this works - something needs to be done with this
    offensive line...
    
    
    Joe                            
36.1119BSS::JCOTANCHWed Aug 26 1992 18:0210
    It's been made official by Reeves that Freeman will start at LT while
    Davidson will move over to LG.
    
    Powers signed yesteday - he was the last holdout.
    
    Nattiel was cut by Tampa yesterday and Reeves said he will consider
    bringing him back, but I doubt that will happen.
    
    
    Joe
36.1120exQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Aug 27 1992 19:265
    hey !!  Is shawn moore on IR or what...
    
    Could be a long year for the Donk faithful..
    
    Dan Reeves has got to go..  the mans a complete $%^$%^#$%^&&#$%^
36.1121ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 27 1992 21:0322
    >> hey !!  Is shawn moore on IR or what...
    
    
================================================================================
Note 36.1109                      Bronco notes                      1109 of 1120
BSS::JCOTANCH                                        20 lines  19-AUG-1992 14:29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>      Does anyone have what the projected return dates are for the
>>    following people?
> >   
>  >>>    Mike Young, Vance, Moore,  Kay, Lanier & any other top player that I
>   > may have forgotten.
    
Moore >- Slight separation of his left shoulder, might play in the final 
preason> game.
    
>Joe
    
    
    HtH,
    Carlos
36.1122Which layer of mid mgmt?QUASER::JACKSONTAAvoid TAP, keep back against wallThu Aug 27 1992 21:0620
      Moore will play 4th qtr Friday.
    
      Offensivly,  this team is in deep stink.    The left side of the
    offensive line doesn't exsist.  A rookie is starting at OLT and
    Davidson moved to left guard.
    
      After reading the paper the last 2 days,  it was shown that reeves
    hasn't picked an OL in the 1st round since Hinton, and of course he was
    traded for Elway.
    
      Elway will most likely be injured this year unless the OL comes
    around,  which is unlikely.
    
      Nattiel was cut by the bucs and did pass waivers,  so he may come
    back to Denver.  I say it couldn't hurt to have him back,  except
    utilize him better.  Reeves probably won't go for it though.
    
      Maddox will not play friday, nor will Kay, Reggie Johnson.
    
    	Tim
36.1123Long..looonnngg...year for donk fans, BG.ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Aug 27 1992 21:5315
    
>      Offensivly,  this team is in deep stink.    The left side of the
 >   offensive line doesn't exsist.  
    
  >    Elway will most likely be injured this year unless the OL comes
   > around,  which is unlikely.
    
    
    Yup, I think you're right about this Tim. The weakness in the left side
    is gonna leave 'ol Bucky wide open to get blind-sided. Which means mega
    fumbles, and possibly a chance for Reeves to test out his 1st round
    pick after Bucky and Moore get their fair share of the hits. 
    
    Carlos
36.1124CSC32::SALZERThu Aug 27 1992 23:5011
    Here we go with the broken record routine again. "We're 
    going to do this-that-and-this to ELway. Boy is he in for
    it now." Don't bet on it. Also don't bet on half the stuff
    you read in the papers especially the tid bits from Ralph.
    I agree with Big  Game. Reeves needs someone to whomp him
    a good one upside the haid although I doubt that would do 
    much good at this late a date. Let's tee it up and see it
    kicked off. I've got a hunch the OL will take care of itself.
    Let the games begin. 
    
    BoB
36.1125A loss at home?QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Aug 31 1992 16:2918
      The Broncos offensive problems still look the same.  No running to
    speak of.  The OL did do better than the previous weeks,  but better
    get it together for the faiders or Biff will be scrambling all day,
    'cause there won't be a running game.
    
       One good thing I did see, was when the OL did good,  Elway would go
    pat them on the back.  That is something I think he needs to continue. 
    If you show you have confidence in them,  then "they" will play better
    IMO.
    
      Defense looked ok,  but still needs to get a pass rush going unless
    Wade is holding back the heavy blitzes for regular season.
    
      Does anyone have the injury report?  Atwater being the biggest
    concern!  Did Haliburton break his neck? Etc..
    
      
         Tim
36.1126ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Aug 31 1992 18:3419
    >>                        -< A loss at home? >-
    
    With another coming....:-)
    
    	Can
    
    	Donk
    
    	fans
    
    	say
    
    	zero
    
    	and
    
    	one...??????
    
    Carlosh
36.1127BSS::JCOTANCHMon Aug 31 1992 19:4219
    Yea Tim, there's no doubt the running game needs to pick it up a few
    notches.  I kept my eye on Freeman a few times and he was doing pretty
    good - the main problem area now is Davidson at LG (not to say the left
    tackle position is in great shape now).
    
    The worst news out of this last preseason game is of course Atwater. 
    He'll probably miss the Faider game.  As for Haliburton, that was far
    more serious - his career may be over.  
    
    I loved it when Hill strolled thru the end zone and just sat in that
    utility vehicle after catching that TD bomb that was called back.  That
    guy has some speed!
    
    I haven't heard the cuts yet, but some of the likely big names to be on
    that list are Perryman, Morgan, Awalt and Holmes.  Smith reinjured his
    groin and may end up on IR.
    
    
    Joe
36.1128BSS::JCOTANCHWed Sep 02 1992 15:0020
    Reeves has decided to go with 2 kickers this year.  They signed Brad
    Daluiso, who was just cut by Dallas.  He'll be used on kickoffs and
    maybe on long field goals.  
    
    As somewhat expected, Nattiel was signed, giving the Broncos 4
    wideouts.  He is only expected to be a stopgap and probably won't be
    around all season.  
    
    Also signed was Victor Jones, a big fullback waived by Houston.  
    Recalled to the roster wee linebackers Tim Lucas and John Sullins.
    
    To make room for these players, placed Vance, Sewell, Sammie Smith, and
    John Granby on IR.  By placing these guys on IR after the 47-man roster
    was declared Monday they're eligible to be activated anytime after the
    4th game.  
    
    Rookie DB Frank Robinson was cut.
    
    
    Joe
36.1129best available back, what's a po' boy to do.CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Wed Sep 02 1992 15:0710
 glad to see Sewell and Smith on the IR. Should mean lots of carries for
 Gaston Green starting RB of the Cosmic Misfits. Now if they can just cut
 down on Elway's interceptions so the Donks hold to the ball longer I'll
 be all set....

 got to admit it gives me the willies knowing I'm going to have to root 
 for someone in Denver....

 ;^)
36.1130USCTR1::NAHEARNWed Sep 02 1992 16:464
    I was surprised to see Awalt waived!!   Has he lost all his ability?
    
    
    Nelly
36.1131QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesWed Sep 02 1992 17:271
      He can't block!
36.1132CSC32::SALZERWed Sep 02 1992 18:568
    In today's new.
    Ralph claims the Donks go no better than 3-13. Then SI
    writer Zimmerman(?) picks Donks to go all the way AND
    win the bowl!  I predict 10-6 overall. 6-2 at home 
    and 4-4 on the road seems reasonable at this point. 
    A 1-0 start would be wonderfull. 
    
    BoB
36.1133FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 02 1992 19:5025
    Paul Zimmerman and I have had a major LDUC in the past.
     
    Paul wrote that the Patriots stats crew was among the worst in the
    league, claiming that we didn't know a sack when the QB got back to the
    line of scrimmage was still a sack and claimed he got into an argument
    with my predecessor.  The argument never happened and we've always
    known the rules on sacks.  Very few things I've ever seen written have
    made me more angry - I got slammed in a book that was published and
    distributed nationwide, written by a writer with a national audience.
    
    This happened in his book "The Thinking Man's Guide to Pro Football"
    which except for one page is a good book.  He has the same story in
    both the first edition and the second edition and I think the incident
    may have happened before the first edition was printed.  He never
    bothered to update it for the second edition.
    
    Ever since then, I've taken everything Paul has written with a grain of
    salt despite the fact that we've exchanged letters, met at a couple of
    Patriots games and gotten our feelings off our chests.  I put extra
    pressure on myself when I know Paul will be attending one of our games,
    to make sure we do everything letter perfectly and get the information
    in for printing faster than even normal.  I want to see him have that
    paragraph out of the book if he ever reissues it.
    
    John                                                                 
36.1134My Personal Name Says It All !!!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Sep 02 1992 21:0822
    
    
     Well, Well, Well...
    
     With the start of the season just around the corner things are looking 
    pretty bleak for the Donks.  No offensive line,  no running game, 
    hurting defense, big play boys on IR and a coach that has his head
    so far up his %^& that he has to lift up his shirt and so he can
    see out his navel.  I can't remember that last time things lookd so
    bad in Donk Land.  My personal opinion...  DAN HAS GOT TO GO !!!
    Yea he's won game and lead them to a few SB's but the man has no logic,
    no sense of reality,  no clue.  To draft Tommy Maddox instead of some
    receivers, O-Linemen or D-Linemen was absolutly rediculous.  Ralph
    Rotten may not be far off with his 3-13 prediction if things  remain as
    they are.  Without help or drastic improvement on the O-Line,  Elway
    won's see October.
    
    
     On the bright side,  there is some good your talent,  and Pat Bolen
    has yet to sign Reeves to a new deal.  May he'll fire the $%^&%^&*
    
    BG
36.1135(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineWed Sep 02 1992 21:1910
    Hey Big 'N Lame, along with all of the other thangs you stated the
    Donks are missing, you forgot one ithing,
    
    
    NO QUARTERBACK!!!!!
    
    Just a huge set of teef.
    
    JaKe
    
36.1136QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesWed Sep 02 1992 22:4018
      Jake Jake Jake,  You know better than speaking BS in here;^
    
      I'm kinda where you are Jack.  Reeves has done a great job,  but
    can't get the job done when its do or die (if that makes sense)... I'm
    not sure if they need to let him go,  but just take alot of the
    offensive responsabilities away.
    
      3-13?  Someone is mis-lead.  I agree it could be a dismal year,  but
    define dismal?  8-8 would be dismal compared to what we/they are used
    to.  I think they stand as good a chance at winning the division as any
    other AFC west team.
    
      The OL will tell the tale.  Yes this 1st game is crucial or so it
    seems.  It should be good.
    
      The donks by 2.
    
    	Tim
36.1137It all rides on the opener...BSS::JCOTANCHThu Sep 03 1992 17:3335
I know most people aren't too excited about Denver's season after a 
disappointing preseason, but the same thing happened year.  They looked like
total $h!t in the final preseason game last year but they proceeded to 
whip Cincinnati 45-14 the next week in the opener and go on to post a 12-4
record.  Now I'm not saying that's what's gonna happen this year but my 
point is how little preseason means.  The Vikings went out and murdered
everyone in the preseason, but I'll bet ya they get beat by Green Bay this
weekend.

Yea, Denver has some serious problem areas (some due to injuries, some are
just plain weaknesses) and the schedule is harder, but if the defense can
stay fairly healthy and keep playing well they will be in every game.  The
big variable will be the offense.  I don't think the offense needs to suddenly 
start hitting on all cylinders for this team to win alot, I think they just
need to hold their own and not give up alot of turnovers.  The Houston game
last year is a good example: The defense actually played a pretty good game,
but the offense turned it over deep in their own territory a couple times and 
when they weren't turning it over they would be 3 quick plays and out.  The
special teams also had a few blunders in that game, which made the game a 
blowout loss and not just a loss.  

Anyway, given those 2 things (defense stays fairly healthy and offense holds
their own) I look for 9-11 wins out of this team.

I'm gonna throw on major asterisk on all this: the opener against the Raiders.
Not just because it's the Raiders, but the opener has set the tone for Denver
under Reeves.  In Dan's 11 seasons in Denver has won the opener 7 times and 
out of those 7 seasons their worst record was 9-7, and they have averaged nearly
11 wins per year in those 7 seasons.  But in the 4 seasons where Denver has lost
the opener they only finished over .500 once and never made the playoffs in any
of those 4 seasons.  Throw in the fact that it's a home game and you get the
point.  


Joe
36.1138ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 03 1992 19:043
    >>			-< It all rides on the opener... >-
    
    Tsskk tsskk tsskkk......pity.
36.1139CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 03 1992 19:2213
    Once again I didn't follow pre-season much. I did watch the 1st half
    of the Cowboy game. It was 7-zip Cowboys at the half which 
    included 2 no-brain ints thrown by Mr Ed. 2nd half was a 
    free for all. Then the seers of doom and gloom came out after
    the Cards game. I didn't watch any of that but I did hear the 
    Broncos had 2 long drives of 60+ yds for TD's in the 1st
    half again (I think). Then the Cards came back strong in 2nd half
    to beat Broncos. So what? The defense should be solid if not one
    of the top units in the NFL. As usuall Denver's defense will
    be the key to a reasonable season. 
    
    BoB
    
36.1140Bottom line: A win for Denver, a loss for LABSS::JCOTANCHMon Sep 07 1992 22:0043
Broncos, 1-0; Faids, 0-1. HA!  So much for Carlos' endless predictions!
    
It's a damm good thing this isn't college football where you not only need to 
win but win impressively.  In pro football, a win is a win no matter how ugly 
or unimpressive.  Let's just say that if this was college, Denver would've 
dropped in the polls just like Penn State did even though the Nittany Lions 
won.

At the end of the first half Raider fans were probably saying they should be 
up about 24-0 the way they moved the ball up and down the field, yet Denver
fans could've easily made a similar argument because 2 Raider turnovers that
put Denver in great field position resulted in zero points for the Broncos.

The Denver offense was worse than most of us would've imagined.  Midway thru
the 3rd quarter they had just 1 first down and 19 total yards.  That's not a
misprint either.  And they looked as bad as the statistics indicate.  In the
first half, Freeman and the rest of the OL looked pathetic while Elway was
running for his life.  And when John had time, he was usually off target.

I was quite disappointed with the defense, particularly against the run.  
They did tighten up pretty good in the 2nd half, but there were still times
when the DL was just getting manhandled.  But one thing the defense got in 
this game which they haven't gotten in the previous 5 losses to LA is 
turnovers.  And that saved the defense in the first half.

As for Elway's final drive, well, why can't he do this the whole game.  Anyone 
who believed that this team could move 85 yards in less than 3 minutes without 
any timeouts just wasn't being realistic with the way the offense had 
performed up to that point.  When John dodged a blitzing Terry McDaniel and 
threw the key pass to Arthur Marshall, it was vintage Elway.  And one has to 
wonder how many other QB's would've been able to take the punishing and 
constant hits Elway did and remain in the game, especially the big-time 
cheapshot Moss delivered in the 3rd quarter.  Anyone who says that's "Raider 
football" is just embarrassing themselves - that's cheapshot football which 
shouldn't be tolerated in this league and should've resulted in Moss' ejection.

Denver should be able to go to 2-0 with the Chargers and their quarterbacking
troubles coming to Mile High next week.  No need to discuss what Denver needs
to improve on next week because it's so obvious - offense! - the OL in 
particular.  Hopefully Atwater will be back too.


Joe
36.1141GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Tue Sep 08 1992 13:289
    
    	Just win baby! :*)
    
    Joe,
    
    	I don't think it was Moss who shoved Elway under the bench.  It
    	was #99.  I think he's a rook.
    
    Claybone
36.1142GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Tue Sep 08 1992 16:174
    
    	Never mind Joe, it was indeed Moss.........
    
    Claybone
36.1143QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesTue Sep 08 1992 19:431
      Anyone have an OL that they would like to trade?
36.1144ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 08 1992 20:4918
    >>          -< Bottom line: A win for Denver, a loss for LA >-
    
    Comments like this really hurt Joe. 
    
    >> So much for Carlos' endless predictions!
    
    And the worst part about it is that they're not over yet, if the
    Chargers 'D' plays like it did against the Chiefs, Bucky's in for
    another beating. By the way, I didn't think that Winston Moss' love tap
    was all that brutal. You see it all the time, whether it's a receiver
    racing to the sidelines trying to get outta bounds and getting a little
    extra help by the DB, or as in this case, Bucky running for his life
    and getting a little shove by Moss on the way out of bounds....no
    biggy, excepting that it happened to the Donks prima-donna QB. Hope he
    didn't break a nail. :-)
    
    Carlitos
    
36.1145All I can say is thank you JayOURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Tue Sep 08 1992 21:444
Winston Moss is a washed up girlyman and thank you for pushing Biff 
under the bench.

Payback is a bitch for Faider fans. 
36.1146TO BE OR " NOT "CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYWed Sep 09 1992 18:146
    All hat's off to Jay. Now he's a real QB " NOT ". 
    Thanks Jay this just what the Broncos needed to get them started.
    
    
    Drewski
    
36.1147Go Broncos!CSC32::SALZERWed Sep 09 1992 18:3516
    Just when I was begining to become a less vindictive Raider
    hater, they show me and the rest of those that watched 
    why I hate them so. I have said it before and I'll say it
    again. The Raiders have an attitude that they intimidate.
    Maybe they do intimidate other teams but as far as the
    Broncos go they NEVER have intimidated this team. Time and
    time again they flag them with 15 yarders. Thank you. I
    have always been amazed at the control Denver maintains 
    while they suck them into their own trap. I heard that
    there was some quick action by the cops to contol fans 
    behind the Raiders when they slam dunked Elway into the 
    bench. The situation was ripe for a blowup. Fortunately
    cooler heads prevailed. Elway's revenge was a beautiful
    thing. The guy is unbelieveable.
    
    BoB 
36.1148Elway played to the level of competitionQUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesWed Sep 09 1992 22:168
       Jay was the Broncos MVP!
    
      Moss' shove was uncalled for and he should have been fined;-)
    
      Carlos,  I told you it would have been a long drive for you to
    watch your faiders lose!
    
      Tim
36.1149CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 10 1992 01:4022
    It was the Raiders. It was the home opener. It was still
    hard to get overly excited about that game. Al's game plan
    was simple. "You must get to the opposing team's QB and
    you must get to him hard." Nice try Al but wrong game plan.
    Speaking of QB's, Al has had that albatross Shroeder hanging
    around his neck so long now he's begining to like him. 
    Marijunavich would have been duck soup though. Enough of
    those idiots. Let's talk Broncos. 
    
    Offensively there's only one way for that bunch to go. 
    There's some new names and faces out there that want
    to make their mark and did a fine job. Look for a steady
    improvement throughout the season in the offense. 
    The defense had an impressive performance. Dennis Smith
    looked like a 3rd year man in his prime. The boys were
    putting some serious licks on the Raiders. Everyone 
    waited for them to collapse from fatigue and lengthy 
    playing time. They kept right in there slamming the 
    door on the running game late in the 4th forcing a 
    punt. That was the ball game right there. 
    
    BoB
36.1150Chargers vs BroncosBSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingThu Sep 10 1992 02:0516
    
    Hey Bob...can they continue to slam the door on running backs like
    Butts, Bernstine and Harmon this Sunday?
    
    The way I see it is that the Broncos will figure the Chargers have no
    passing game, so they will stack the D against the run and dare the
    Chargers to pass.  To win, the Chargers have to pass successfully.
    
    Conversely, I see the Chargers D tough against the run, but never safe
    against the pass and certainly not safe against Elway.  If we can
    fluster Elway or shut down the passing game, that'll go a long way for
    a Charger win.  We'll see....and I'll be there.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
    
36.1151CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 10 1992 03:0710
    Well Glen you know I hate to overlook anyone.  When I look
    at the Chargers though, I expect them to come out of their
    long semi-comatose state and blast the Broncos someday. 
    It just never seems to happen.  I hope this sunday isn't that day. 
    All of the AFC West teams learned a long time ago that
    defense begins with stopping the run. There always seems to
    be a lot of good backs in that division. 
    
    BoB 
    
36.1152?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOThu Sep 10 1992 18:4324
    >> The defense had an impressive performance.
    
    What !???, You must've been watching a different game than I was.
    Anytime your team allows an opponent to run ~160 yards on you, BoB,
    that is anything but an impressive performance......if it wouldna been
    for Shredder, the Raiders woulda blew them completly outta the water.
    Now if you wanna talk about impressive defensive performances, how does
    allowing the doinks 19 TOTAL yards on offense during the first half
    sound. Now that's impressive. Like I said in the Raider topic, the
    reason the donks were able to slow down the Raiders running game in the
    second half was due to a very weak game plan by offensive co-ordinator,
    Terry Robiskie (him and Shredder deserve each other). It became very
    obvious that every time the Raiders lined up in the I-formation they
    were gonna run the ball, if they would have threw in a little play
    action here and there, they would have caught Dennis Smith with his
    pants down....he was coming up and stuffing the run every time they
    lined up in the I.    Robiskie & Shredder both gotta go, and the sooner
    the better. The Chargers, with Arnspargers new defense, and a little
    play action by Humphries, could walk outta mile-hi with a coke and a
    smile.
    
    HtH
    
    Carlos
36.1153CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 10 1992 19:2211
    Please Carlos. The only real defensive stat that has any real 
    meaning to me is points allowed. Don't forget the D scored 
    on you too and almost scored another time and came up with
    turnovers stopping drives and on and on and on.... 
    Also please take your Schroeder whinning over to Raider land
    where your sure to get some sympathy. Always remember it
    was a Donk, Mike Shannahan that wanted Burlein over 
    Schroeder to begin with and that's what got him fired. 
    Give me a break.
    
    BoB
36.1154ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 11 1992 19:159
    None of it matters now, as it's in the history books as a win for the
    donks. And I wasn't out for your sympathy, but I was trying to set you
    straight, that it wasn't so much the donks awesome defense that decided
    this contest as it was shredder's ineptitude. If it wouldn't have been
    for shredders many, and very conciderate gifts, the "only real
    defensive stat that has any real meaning" would have likely been
    similar to the yardage stats. etc etc.... HtH
    
    Carlos
36.1155CSC32::J_HERNANDEZRunning With The Devil (dog)Fri Sep 11 1992 21:1212
    Carlos, so then cain it be said that Denver's lack of O was due to
    smElway's ineptitude and not the Faider(tm to cacti) D. 
    
    
    The CAAYOBI Club(tm) was totally disgusted with the Faids. The Donks
    were pretty much like I figgered they'd be. I justed figgered the Faids
    would be better. Guess not. 
    
    Geez, the way the Donks drove for the winning td makes me wonder if
    this CAAYOBI Club(tm) stuff is worth it. 
    
    Childs, you there? Slap me please!
36.1156BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingMon Sep 14 1992 15:1316
    
    
    			7 dropped passes
    
    
    			7 dropped passes
    
    
    			7 dropped passes
    
    
    			o    u    c    h
    
    
    	Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
36.1157BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Mon Sep 14 1992 15:2127
Denver is off to a nice 2-0 start, but looking at the next 5 games on the
schedule a 2-0 start was a must, considering those 2 games were at home.

The offense was adequate yesterday, but still far from consistent, and the 
running game continues to be nonexistent.  Denver had a nice drive to open the
game, but they proceeded to disappear for the rest of the first half.  After
that first drive, Denver's offense only netted 21 yards for the rest of the 
half.  They are trying to go deep and open things up quite often, although
not with a whole lot of success.  I really liked how they went straight to the
end zone (to Sharpe) after Dimry's interception in the 3rd quarter.

The defense has only given up 13 points in each game, but you still don't feel
like they're playing that great.  They came up with 5 sacks yesterday but 
San Diego practically ran the ball at will.  Last week against the defense 
lived by the turnover, yesterday it was kind of like the bend-but-don't-break
theory.  When San Diego got down there, the defense usually came up with 
something: a blocked field goal, a big sack to take SD out of field goal 
range, a goal-line stand to hold SD to a field goal, another stand to force a
field goal, and an interception late in the game.

You have to be satisfied if Denver can split these next 2 road games (at Phil.,
at Clev.) and be 3-1.  Philly appears to be one of the league's top teams, and 
it's always a dogfight (no pun intended!) at Cleveland.  Looking ahead a bit,
6-2 at the break would be great.


Joe
36.1158QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 14 1992 17:3217
      Elway is going to have a long day next sunday!  I say start him in
    the shotgun on 1st down situations.  Don't line up in the I and run the
    ball up the middle.  Gee for some reason that was just SO obvious
    yesterday!
    
      Start using Reggie Rivers more!  Even Greg Lewis wouldn't hurt.  Yes
    he fumbles,  but when you are in for 3 and punt every series,  well not
    much else will hurt IMO.
    
      Elway just overthrough a few.  1 to Mark Jackson that I remember.  He
    was standing wide open, and Elway tossed the ball into the 3rd level.
    
      I think the Charger are going to be better than people think.  Of
    course I have been saying that for some time, soooooooo......????
    
    
      Tim
36.1159BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Mon Sep 14 1992 18:3414
    
>      Elway just overthrough a few.  1 to Mark Jackson that I remember.  He
>    was standing wide open, and Elway tossed the ball into the 3rd level.
    
I remember that play and it was severely overthrown, but they were saying
how one of the Charger DB's was kind of laying back just waiting for Elway
to throw that pass so he could make the pick.  Now whether Elway actually
threw it away because of that or it just got away from him I don't know.

If the defense doesn't play a good game this week they'll probably get blown
out.  And if the offense does manage to put up some points, I'm sure they'll
look ugly doing it.

Joe
36.1160QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 14 1992 19:235
      The defense would look better than they have if the offense would
    stay on the field more than 3 plays and with them playing one of the
    best defenses,  that will be unlikely.
    
      Tim
36.11612-0OURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Mon Sep 14 1992 21:4415
A good start and consistent improvement the first drive was a thang of beaUty 
80yds 8 plays 5:00 minutes. Turn of the T.V go outside and enjoy the weather
this game was a wrap. 

I noticed that S.D did score a couple of times but no worry I'm sure Denver 
played like Dallas built up a early lead then just played consistent enough to 
take the enchilada's home for supper. 

You'd think the Bronco's were in the cellar ala Faiders or Giants the way 
everybody is so down and out about the offense. Face it the only things the 
Chargers and Raiders cain do is run the ball up the middle for 2 plays and if
it's 3rd and more than 4yrds pray that a less than average QB can complete a 
pass to a less than average WR.  

Jeff
36.1162QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 14 1992 22:546
      re-1  Thats the most I have seen you type in 2 years...It musta been
    that water downed tap beer at Cleats friday;^)
    
      keep it up!
    
    	Tim
36.1163GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Tue Sep 15 1992 13:204
    
    	You tell 'em Tim.  Go git back in your hole Riggo! :*)
    
    Claybone
36.1164BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Wed Sep 16 1992 16:0714
    And when Riggen *does* reply in here it's pretty much a worthless note.
    :^)
    
    The paper ran a front-page story today about how the Eagles have
    had 11 quarterback 'kills' (QB's knocked out of games) in their last 28
    games, including 7 in the last 9 games of the 1990 regular season. 
    Better run alot of rollouts, John.
    
    And FWIW (probably nothing) the visiting team has won the last 3
    meeting between these 2 teams.
    
    
    Joe
             
36.1165Clyde, Reggie, Jerome, and MikeSHALOT::HUNTNo, Daddy, I glued them on the fish!Wed Sep 16 1992 16:4317
36.1166BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Wed Sep 16 1992 17:1327
    
    Bob, the complete list of their QB knockouts follows the form feed.
    
    
    
There were a few differences from who you had in '91 - I don't know who's right.

1990:

Steve Grogan
Jeff Rutledge
Stan Humphries
Chris Miller
Phil Simms
Anthony Dilweg
Troy Aikman


1991:
Testaverde
Bobby Hebert
Boomer Esiason


1992:
Rosenbach

36.1167CheckSHALOT::HUNTNo, Daddy, I glued them on the fish!Wed Sep 16 1992 17:464
 That sounds about right.  I try to do these things from the ol' brain
 cells and sometimes they're in the game and sometimes they ain't.
 
 Bob Hunt
36.1168CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 17 1992 19:198
    The Eagles might 'kill' a lot of qb's but last year 
    they had a couple of their own killed also.  This feels
    like a very shakey 2-0.  Win or loose, this is a game that
    answers a lot of questions for me at least.  If they
    can keep hanging in there with minimum injury untill the 
    walking wounded can return, they should do just fine.  
    
    BoB
36.1169GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseThu Sep 17 1992 21:4811
    I have a friend in the Phila. area who is a big Broncos fan (he watches
    them every week at my house on my satellite dish). He's interested in
    greeting the team when they land in Philly on Friday or Saturday to
    show his support, but when he called the Broncos for the info, they
    told him that they would not disclose their arrival time for "security
    reasons". My question is 2 part:
    	1. When will they be landing in Philadelphia?
    	2. Do other teams do this too?
    
    Dennis Faust
    
36.1170BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Thu Sep 17 1992 22:525
    All I've heard is that they're leaving Saturday.  I think alot of teams
    have their charter stop away from the main terminal and the players
    just get directly on a bus and head for the hotel.
    
    Joe 
36.1171FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Sep 18 1992 12:2921
    Most teams do not go through airport gates unless they're clearing
    customs or unless there's a local law requiring them to do so.
    
    Generally, a football road trip goes like this:
    
    Bus from the stadium to the airport where the bus brings the team right
    to the plane.  Some people not taking the bus will go to the terminal
    and be brought out to the plane by the airline folks.  Plane leaves and
    flies to the other city.  Plane lands and is met by the buses.  Bus
    takes the team right to the hotel.  Meetings, dinner, meetings and
    beddy-bye.  Get up in the morning.  Have breakfast.  Buses to the
    stadium.  Play the game.  Leave the stadium.  Bus back to the airport
    and go right to the plane again.  Fly home.  Buses meet team at plane.
    
    A football trip is designed to go as much like clockwork as possible
    with distractions from fans minimized as much as possible.  Coaches
    want the players thinking about the game without worrying about travel
    hassles.  The best bet for your friend is to attempt to meet the team
    at the hotel and not at the airport.
    
    John
36.1172PFSVAX::JACOBIntro to Employee Interest Noting 101Fri Sep 18 1992 12:329
    Set mode=Sam_Kinnison
    
    
    Wouldn't want da pooor liddle boys to get distracted by some silly FAN
    OF THEIRS NOW, WOULD WE!!!!!!
    
    
    JaKe
    
36.1173FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Sep 18 1992 13:0247
    Jake, it's not just distractions from fans, it's distractions from
    anything.  It's drummed into these guys from the time they start taking
    overnight trips (in some states it's high school, in most cases it
    doesn't start happening until college) that these are business trips. 
    They aren't travelling to party or have a good time, they are
    travelling to do a job.  It's a job that they only have one chance to
    do and do well, and the cost of not doing that job can be high.  The
    focus and intensity needed to do that job is incredibly high, and
    coaches don't want anything to distract from it.
    
    That's why there's such a focus on making the travel go smoothly.  That
    was my job for a brief period during my internship with the team 15
    years ago.  It's a lot of pressure.  The buses better damn well be
    where they're supposed to be when they're supposed to be there.  The
    plane better be ready.  The room keys better be ready for handing out
    at the hotel.  Everybody better know where the meeting rooms and dining
    rooms are.  Police escorts are provided to and from the stadium.  The
    phones are shut off in the hotel rooms after a certain hour.  All of it
    is designed to allow the players to focus in on their jobs.
    
    My situation is a bit unique in that I've seen it from both sides, both
    as a fan and from a team.  To a fan, it's a big deal to see their
    favorite athlete up close and say hello.  If it was only one fan, it
    wouldn't be a big deal.  Multiply it by many fans, and it becomes a
    pain.  One of the things that's made it worse, especially for baseball
    players, is autograph seekers.  I have friends who've played pro sports
    but any socializing I've ever done with them has been in the offseason
    and not when they've been on a road trip.  I stay out of the way.
    
    With Coach MacPherson, I would go to the game at BC when Syracuse would
    come down.  I'd visit with him at the practice on Friday before the
    game and in his hotel suite the night before the game - but only
    because I was invited.  If I ever sensed that I was being a pain or
    distracting him from what he needed to get done, I wouldn't have done
    it and I just would have said hello to him after the game.  I think it
    was a sign of the strength of our friendship that I was invited to any
    team function - meetings, dinner, post-game locker room - and I was
    thrilled and happy that he'd think that much of me to allow me to do
    so.  I like to think that having old friends around helped him relax
    before a game.  About all I do now that he works for the Patriots is
    say hello to him after games - win or lose.
    
    I'm not saying the insulation of a team from people is right but I
    understand why it's done and there are some very legitimate reasons for
    doing so.
    
    John
36.1174GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseFri Sep 18 1992 13:384
    Thanks for the info, John.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
36.1175exQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Sep 18 1992 18:5117
    UGLY,UGLY,UGLY...	
    
     Thats all I have to say about the Donks and their 2-0 start.  Elway
    had better bring the oxygen with him cause the poor SOB is gonna be
    running for his life.  Look for this game to be a major blow out.
    I'm not say ing will necessarily be the Donks that are on the losing
    end of this one either.  I can see the Begal's looking past the 
    happless 2-0 Donks to their next game.  After all, lets face it, the
    NFC is never to terribly frightened of the AFC ball clubs they face.
    The Begals have a massive, quick, tanented, and experienced "D"
    the should total dominate the Broncos flock of rookies and no talent
    bozo on the O-line.  But,  The Donks have Mr. Ed and we all know
    by now that anything is possible when Buckey in town...
    
    Go Donks !!
    
    BG
36.1176PFSVAX::JACOBW I N D- it passes and breaksFri Sep 18 1992 19:079
    >>UGLY,UGLY,UGLY...
    
    That's funny, Big'N'Lame, cause that's all the rest of the workd cain
    say about Big Teef Mr. Ed!!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
36.1177They put the ughh in ugly!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 18 1992 19:587
    >> UGLY, UGLY, UGLY!
    
    I'm forced, big_shame, the donks are the ugliest 2-0 team around, 
    while on the other hand, my beloved Raiders happen to be the prettiest
    0-2 team around....of course Hal might disagree.
    
    Carlos
36.1178FAIDERS PLAY UGLY!BSS::BSORENSONThe BattlerFri Sep 18 1992 21:117
    
    Speaking of UGLY!  Carlos, did you hear that Faider Winston Moss
    finally was fined for pushing Elway under the metal bench in week 1?
    Yep, $2500 for his flagrant foul.  Now that proves it was UGLY!
    Therefore, the Faiders play UGLY!
    
    B_Bob
36.1179BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-2!Fri Sep 18 1992 21:144
    Much rather be an ugly 2-0 than a pretty 0-2.
    
    
    Joe
36.1180"Ouch, ya almost hurt my wrist, ya big brut!"ELMAGO::CGRIEGOSat Sep 19 1992 14:4614
36.1181ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Sep 21 1992 05:015
    When you started the "UGLY" thread did you have a premonition of the
    outcome of Sunday's game against the Eagle??
    
    HtH (tm to Kev)
    The Crazy Met
36.1182NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 21 1992 12:5513
    > Like I said before, if this woulda happened to anybody else other than
    > the donks prima-donna, Bucky, it would've been a non-issue.
    
    Nonsense.  I finally saw the play in question and it was the blatantest
    of blatant cheapshots.  Usually a play like that on an opponents' QB
    results in a full-scale brawl.  If anything, the Broncos wimped out by
    not sticking up for Elway by pummelling the offender and initiating such
    a brawl...
    
    glenn
    
    
36.1183CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Sep 21 1992 12:585
    TCM -
    
    HTH (standing for Hope this helps) is TM'd by Spud and me..
    
    JD
36.1184Shoulda mailed it in!QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 21 1992 13:001
      Was there a game against the Eagles this weekend?
36.1185At least the AFC Central helped outBSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-3!Mon Sep 21 1992 14:0328
Well, the good news of the day was that everyone else in the division lost
(except Seattle, and who cares about them) and Elway didn't get hurt.  You
know it's bad when the punter is selected as the offensive MVP.  Or when you
only manage 82 yards of total offense, 3rd worst in team history.  Ouch!

As bad as Denver was, you gotta give the Eagle defense alot of credit.  It
seemed like Philly had about 14 guys out there all afternoon.  Absolutely 
*nothing* worked for Denver.  The play of the day for Denver came on special
teams when Arthur Marshall had a long punt return only to be stopped by 
Philly's punter.  The Eagles nearly doubled Denver in time of possession.

Denver was 0 for 11 on 3rd downs yesterday, putting them at 3 for 32 on the 
season, far and away the worst in the league.  And that's no coincidence, 
either.  The offense really is that bad at this point.  They flashed a graphic
on the screen yesterday that Denver was next-to-last in the league in first
downs, and with yesterday's grand total of 4 they're undoubtedly in dead last
now.  

The worst part of this loss is that Denver was just plain whipped.  It's not 
like Denver gave up a bunch of turnovers and/or some special teams touchdowns,
they were just plain beaten soundly.  I kind of thought they might have a game
like this against Philly.  They're still in good shape in the division but 
need a road win next week in what will be one of their easier road games of the
season.  Unless they find an offense, *some* offense, it's not gonna be easy
though.


Joe
36.1186Mr. LuckyCNTROL::CHILDSClick, Bang. Your daddy just shot po' me..Mon Sep 21 1992 14:084
It's game like these that prove John Elway has no business in the Hall of Fame...

mike
36.1187BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-3!Mon Sep 21 1992 14:203
    Last time I checked, he wasn't in the Hall of Fame.
    
    Joe
36.1188....ice predicts...ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Sep 21 1992 14:5114
    
    As I gaze into the crystal iceBALL, what do I see for this coming
    sunday in the dawgs-donks clash...
    
    PREDICTION:  The Browns will win the game outright...
    
    Unless...
    
    ... the donks score more points.
    
    
    
    
    Nice predicition, huh?
36.1189ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Sep 21 1992 14:566
    JD
    
    I prefer Kev's interpretation of HtH.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1190CSC32::J_HERNANDEZHuh?Mon Sep 21 1992 16:441
    So anyone else wanna join the CAAYOBI CLUB(tm)?
36.1191CSC32::SALZERTue Sep 22 1992 18:265
    It was an obvious case of overcoaching.  Here it is only the
    3rd week of the season and Reeves already has them playing 
    in super bowl form. What next?    
    
    BoB 
36.1192SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Sep 22 1992 18:332
       Where's Big Game been?
                                   Denny
36.1193BIG'N'LAMEwatch Day 2??????PFSVAX::JACOBU S 1992 Rodeo Sex ChampionTue Sep 22 1992 18:427
    
    
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
36.1194ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 22 1992 20:475
    So....how'd Bucky do this weekend? heh heh heh........
    
    HtH
    
    Carlos
36.119530-0 didn't reflect how close the score really wasOURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Tue Sep 22 1992 22:125
Seems to me that Dan Reeves has the entire NFL fooled into thinking the 
Broncos are a cake walk for the rest of season. 


Jeff
36.1196Danny boy must go...CSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYWed Sep 23 1992 20:1712
    Me thinks the Broncos needs a New coach and offensive cordinator.
    
    Danny Boy has been great for the Broncos but he's had 3 trys at 
    the SB and Failed. I say Give someone else a try. Besides that he's
    wasting Bronco draft choices. Look at what karl pickens is doing with
    the bengals and Danny boy picks a QB won't be ready for x years leaving
    what some might call one of the greatest QB's in the game unprotected.
    That tells you how much Elway and Dan like each other. Bottom line 
    Danny boy must go.....
    
    
    Drewski
36.1197CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 24 1992 03:379
    Yeah but Drewski, that 3 strikes your out stuff is a
    different game.  Don't get me wrong.  I'm not here to 
    defend Reeves but give the guy credit where he is due.
    Granted, he blew this year's 1st pick.  He's blown other 
    picks too but he also has pulled some real deals out of
    nowhere. Pickens' value as a receiver is taken away if
    the QB doesn't have the blocking to set up and throw with.
    
    BoB
36.1198Big'N'Lame watch Day 4PFSVAX::JACOBMartin's half the man Jimmy C. isThu Sep 24 1992 12:265
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
36.1199Cacti wants REeves outta there!QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesThu Sep 24 1992 12:3915
      I'm starting to agree again,  Reeves needs to be waived!  Like stated
    before,  anyone want to trade an OL for Collie?
    
      The offensive coordinator has an easy job.  He designs plays that
    reeves throws away!  If you haven't noticed, the Broncos use the same
    plays year in and year out!  The only new thing I have seen the last 10
    years is the slant pattern that they were using in pre-season, and 2-3
    times during this regular season.
    
      Should be an intersting game this weekend....
    
      Carlos,  the faids still looking for a QB?  0-3 is the best start
    that I've seen for the faids in years!  Its a race for cellar dwellers!
    
    	Tim
36.1200HELP WANTED: NEW COACH NEEDEDCSC32::LATOURDO WHAT YOU SAYThu Sep 24 1992 15:2910
    
    	Bob don't get me wrong Danny boy is a great coach. I just 
    	think its time he moves on. I mean with the Broncos he's too
    	predictable on offense. I mean which team in the NFL Denver 
    	plays don't look for the QB Draw, Shuttle pass, and the Delay
    	Draw to the running back. That's basically been Denvers offense
    	since Elway came into the NFL.
    
    
    	Drewski
36.1201CSC32::SALZERFri Sep 25 1992 23:147
    Today's Rocky had an interesting article by Bob Kravitz. 
    He was writing about the 4 released free agents. Reeves'
    opinion on the matter is "I don't think they can help us.
    That's basically it."  Dan appears to be loosing his grip
    on reallity. 
    
    BoB
36.1202QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesSat Sep 26 1992 16:271
      I'll take Keith Jackson any day!
36.1203Even the Pats had 2SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Sep 28 1992 11:172
       Donks score 0 TDs last 2 games!
                                 Denny
36.1204Faids 0-4 after tonight???QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 28 1992 12:2716
      Its sad,  but at least they moved the ball on offense this week.  Now
    they are back to the usual Red Zone problem of not scoring TDs.
    
      Another win though!
    
      3-1.  It will be 4-3 after the next 3 games unless they do better on
    offense.
    
      Defense seemed to bend but not break.  They better not bend against
    the skins and bills!
    
    
      Yesterday musta been the day of DROPPED BALLS!!!   For alot of teams, 
    specially Jakes team!
    
       Tim
36.1205BSS::JCOTANCHFaiders are 0-3!Mon Sep 28 1992 14:0827
>                        -< Faids 0-4 after tonight??? >-

Without a doubt.  I'll admit right now though that I'll be pulling for 'em 
to beat Luckalo in a couple weeks.
 
>     Its sad,  but at least they moved the ball on offense this week.  Now
>    they are back to the usual Red Zone problem of not scoring TDs.
    
Exactly - hey, one step at a time for this offense!  If they could've at least
stuck a couple of those in the end zone we're looking at 20-0 and everyone's
happy.  On Denver's last scoring drive they pretty much sensed that a FG would
be nearly as clinching as a touchdown and were playing it safe.  The last thing
they needed to do was to let the Browns get a cheap and fast 6 points and
suddenly it's a whole new ballgame.  Speaking of that last drive, it was huge.
When they started down at the 3 I was thinking that just a first down would be
great.  The long run by Rivers may have been the most crucial play of this game.
And speaking of Rivers, I think he should move into the starting lineup ahead
of Gaston.  Rivers is better at creating of finding a hole, and that's the type
of back they need right now.  

It may have been ugly, it may have been against a team down to their 3rd QB, but
it was still a big win because it was a road win.  I also think it was a must 
win, because if you look at Denver's remaining road game not many of them appear
to be probable wins. 


Joe
36.1206Donks are hurting in administrationFRETZ::HEISERtragically coolMon Sep 28 1992 15:4325
    Pat Bowlen on Keith Jackson: "He's a good pass-catching tight end, but
    that's all he is.  He's not a blocker.  He's just a big, good tight end
    who can catch."
    
    Our local paper had an interesting tidbit yesterday about an aired
    confrontation involving the Donks GM John Beake and former NFL 
    receiver Dave Logan (radio host of the show).  
    
    Beake:  We have no interest (in Jackson) because he can't fit into our 
            system.  
    Logan:  That speaks poorly of the Broncos' offensive system.
    Beake: I'll tell you what I'd say about our system, we've been to 3
           Super Bowls in 6 years.
    Logan: John, that's fine.  But I'd say this about your system...
    Beake: That's the end of the conversation.
    Logan: No, that's not going to be the end of the conversation.
    Beake: Well, it is tonight.
    Logan: Then I'm going to continue the conversation, because if you are
           going to talk about a tight end with the skills of Keith Jackson, 
           and he can't fit in the system, your system stinks.
    Beake: Dave, you can say that on your own show.  You don't say that on
           my show.
    Logan: I'm the host of the show.  I'll say whatever I want to.
    Beake: Then, you are going to have the whole show to yourself.  (Beake
           then took his headset off and left the show).
36.1207worst 3-1 team I've ever seen...CNTROL::CHILDSGeorge Bush, mental wimpMon Sep 28 1992 16:547
 Has anyone asked Elway how he feels about Jackson???

 probably have and he nixed cause he doesn't want to loose his star
 power........

 mike
36.1208QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Sep 28 1992 20:0327
      I like Keith,  and Beake is full of it!  At least Jackson can catch
    the ball, as opposed to Kay.  Kay catches about 50% of what is thrown
    his way.
    
      I watched quite a few games when Jackson was at Oklahoma,  and in
    that option attack,  he was great at blocking and he lead the team in
    receptions if I remember correctly.
    
      He could be on my team and I'm sure Elway would like it!
    
      They do need an OLG & OLT 1st!!!  The right side of the OL is ok at
    best,  but the left is worse.  Center is solid IMO.  I also think that
    Jeff Davidson sucks!  Put in DAve Widell.  He ain't great,  but is
    better.
    
      I agree about Rivers,  but I have said that since game 1 or 2.  Even
    that Victor Jones was giving what seemed to me more effort than Green.
    
      I was happy to see Greg Lewis get another chance and he came through
    by NOT fumbling.
    
       1 Big name DL would be a big plus.  Denvers pass rush is still
    lacking.  I thought Croel would be doing more.
    
      Any injury report?
    
    	Tim
36.1209NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 28 1992 20:096
    
    That's one hell of a radio show!  You gotta like a guy who confronts a
    team management type instead of the usual kow-towing...
    
    glenn
    
36.1210Dave Logan Vs John Beake Round 2 this Thursday nightOURGNG::RIGGENT Maddox, J Namath, J Elway...Mon Sep 28 1992 21:005
Yes the same Dave Logan from the Cleveland Browns. He's a CU graduate and 
a very talented color person in the booth. Wouldn't be the least bit suprised 
to see him on T.V. color for ESPN, TNT, NBC. 


36.1211FRETZ::HEISERtragically coolMon Sep 28 1992 22:393
>           -< Dave Logan Vs John Beake Round 2 this Thursday night >-
    
    Will Beake spread his wings again or show up this time?
36.1212that's not punny, er I mean funnyGENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Tue Sep 29 1992 12:114
    
    	Ole Dave Logan sure is pecking away at Beake eh? 
    
    Claybone
36.1213BSS::JCOTANCHJust Lose, BabyTue Sep 29 1992 14:1931
    
>    Our local paper had an interesting tidbit yesterday about an aired
>    confrontation involving the Donks GM John Beake and former NFL 
>    receiver Dave Logan (radio host of the show).  
    
I wasn't listening to the show that night because I was watching Thursday night
college football, but they played that particular segment of the show on the
local news later on and it was hilarious.  Logan isn't afraid to confront 
anyone or tell them how he feels.  Last year Logan was pissed at Reeves about
something and he told about it face to face.  As for Beake, he's somewhat of a
hothead.  A couple weeks ago he was extremely pissed off because the Rockies'
schedule came out and they are scheduled to be home 3 of the 4 Sundays next
September.  When they interviewed Beake about the schedule he was practically
yelling at the reporters saying how the Broncos have the first right to Mile
High and he doesn't know what the hell the Rockies think they're trying to pull
off here.  

There really was no issure here.  First of all, it's not really an
issue until the Bronco schedule comes out next Spring.  If there's a conflict,
then the Rockies and MLB need to work around it, but until the NFL schedule
comes out, there's no conflict.  Beake was way out of line getting as upset as
he did.

I also think Logan is a very good color analyst and am kind of surprised one of
the networks haven't picked him up.  In addition to the talk show, he does
color for the Broncos on the radio, color for CU games when a local station 
picks up their games, the Bill McCartney show, and the Big 8 Gridiron report
on Prime with Drew Goodman.


Joe
36.1214FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Sep 29 1992 14:215
    The NFL schedule generally works around the baseball schedule.  Look
    for the Broncos to have 1 home Sunday game in September and either an
    open date or a Monday night game.
    
    John
36.1215BSS::JCOTANCHJust Lose, BabyTue Sep 29 1992 14:3117
>    The NFL schedule generally works around the baseball schedule.  Look
>    for the Broncos to have 1 home Sunday game in September and either an
>    open date or a Monday night game.
    
They probably will but don't *have* to in this case.  Like you said, a Monday
night home game in September is the most likely scenario, but I would 
think playing 3 of the first 4 on the road is also a possibility.

RE: Injury report
Fletcher has a sprained left ankle and is listed as doubtful for the KC game.
Kay, Brooks, and Atwater are banged up but should play.

Also, Vance will be taken off IR and is expected to play Sunday.  There's also
a good chance that Sammie Smith will be activated.


Joe 
36.1216CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttTue Sep 29 1992 14:4611
Saw some old films of Mike(?) Garrett, the Chiefs RB in the mid-sixties,
in the old AFL.

Some of the footage was agains the Broncos.  They didn't seem to have
the familiar D/horse logo on their helmets, but I couldn't figure out
what it was.

I though they always had the Blue helmet with D and horse.....


'Saw
36.1217PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Sep 29 1992 14:5110
  You can count me as another Dave Logan fan. Not only is he a great color
  analyst and a person who is not afraid to honestly express his feelings
  on any sports topic but he also has a great sense of humor and can handle
  call-ins and audience questions with the skill of a "Larry King".
  With his skills, he deserves to be on national TV but I like him so much,
  I hope he stays here. I especially like the radio talk show with Bill
  McCartney. Logan and Mac have more than once left me rollin on the floor
  with laughter. 

	Keith
36.1218BSS::JCOTANCHJust Lose, BabyTue Sep 29 1992 15:169
> Some of the footage was agains the Broncos.  They didn't seem to have
> the familiar D/horse logo on their helmets, but I couldn't figure out
> what it was.

    I think they used to have a weird looking bucking bronco on their
    helmet.  And of course there's the infamous striped socks.
    
    Joe
36.1219FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Sep 29 1992 15:3216
    3 out of 4 on the road in September is certainly a possibility and I
    didn't mean to discount it.  It's just that if they want to have two
    home games in September, one would end up being on a Monday night.
    
    The NFL by the nature of its scheduling system where the opponents
    aren't decided until after the season is at the mercy of the baseball
    schedule because baseball is scheduled first.  One of the parameters in
    the NFL schedule is the availability of the facilities where the park
    is shared with a baseball team - Joe Robbie Stadium (starting in 1993),
    the entire AFC Central (although Cleveland will have a new baseball
    park in 1994), San Diego, Seattle, Denver, Philadelphia, San Francisco
    (through this year anyway), Anaheim, Minneapolis and Milwaukee (though
    the Pack usually can work around the availability of County Stadium
    fairly easily).
    
    John
36.1220QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesTue Sep 29 1992 17:109
      RE-Logo
    
      Isn't there a logo note in this conference that has the info
    your lookin' for?
    
    
      Tim
    
     ps,  didn't the 49'rs start this season 3 out of 4 on the road?
36.1221GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseTue Sep 29 1992 21:4610
    If you want to see what the old Bronco helmet looked like, call the Pro
    Football HoF and have them send you a gift catalog. They sell them
    there.  BTW- it ought ot be called the NFL HoF- they refuse to
    acknowledge the WFL or USFL in that place, as well as not much on the
    CFL. I was totally taken aback by Larry Csonka's plaque- when they
    listed his career, the WFL years were not accounted for in any way. It
    was like he went into the Army for two years and didn't do anything.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
36.1222FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 30 1992 11:215
    I'm not even sure if the AAFC (the league from which the Browns and
    Niners came) is acknowledged in the Pro Football Hall of Fame.  Check
    Otto Graham's or Paul Brown's plaque to be sure.
    
    John
36.1223SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Sep 30 1992 11:232
       I'll check nexted month John. I'll be there!
                                 Denny
36.1224CSC32::SALZERFri Oct 02 1992 01:4416
    It's a very strange season so far but no matter how you cut
    it a shakey 3-1 is much better than a shakey 0-4 or anything 
    in between.  KC seems to be a hard luck story at Denver.
    It's been something like 6 years since they have won here
    and of course the Schotenheimer curse is still on. 
    Denver just might beat those guys for undisputed 1st place.
    The Broncos know Kreig and they know the their big backs. 
    The Chiefs secondary usually has a good day against Mr Ed
    but ol' bucky generally has the last hee-haw. It was refreshing
    to see Denver able to run again at least for some success.
    Granted it was against a tired looking Browns team but at this
    point you take the positive where you find it. 
    Regardless of the w/l, this will be a good hitting tune up
    for the Skins on MNF.  
    
    BoB
36.1225BSS::JCOTANCHJust Lose, BabyFri Oct 02 1992 12:487
    KC hasn't won in Denver since 1982.  
    
    Denver released Nattiel and Perryman a couple days ago and resigned DB
    Frank Robinson and brought Vance off IR.
    
    
    Joe
36.1226The Vance will help!!QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesFri Oct 02 1992 15:1310
      Go Denver!  I agree with what Bob said a couple back.  If Denver can
    slow the KC runners down,  then they will most likely win.  Craig is
    known to choke when forced to throw under pressure!
    
      I'm outta here for weeks!  Field trip to Sequel.
    
      I hope Atwater plays, as well as Brooks.  Simon isn't if I heard
    right.  All impact players!
    
    	Tim
36.1227CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Oct 02 1992 15:196
At the Jints/JEsts preseason game, Slasher told me that the Broncos will
win the AFC this year.   And  Slasher is never wrong.

So rest easy Bronco fans.  It is in the bag.

JD
36.1228Big Bad John!!!GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Mon Oct 05 1992 11:211
    
36.1229BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 05 1992 12:256
    
    UN...
    
    BEE...
    
    LEEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
36.1230YES!COMET::FARMERAMon Oct 05 1992 12:532
    Thank ya "M.A.M."!!!!
                        M.A.M. (Mile High Miracle).
36.1231ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Oct 05 1992 13:407
    Ok it was 19-6 and Broncs won 20-19. When did they get the two TD's?
    
    KC has now loast 12 straight at Mile High. They must feel like FS when
    they play Miami.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1232BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 05 1992 13:4649
You gotta be kiddin' me.  To quote Dave Logan, the color commentator on the
radio, "If I wasn't sitting here watching this, I wouldn't believe it!"  When
Denver was down 19-6 (having already been spared from sure defeat by holding
the Chiefs to a field goal on KC's previous possession), everything had to go
right for Denver from that point on.  Things went so right that the Chiefs 
had time to drive to midfield after Denver took the lead but ran out of downs
instead of time.  Schottenheimer's gotta be wondering if he'll ever win a game 
in Denver.

There's a lot of gushing over Elway and another comeback, but there were quite
a few factors involved in this one.  Sure, he threw 2 perfect TD passes on 
corner routes, one of which came on 3rd and 15, but Schottenheimer's strange 
decisions down the stretch, a big play on a kickoff, a defensive stand, and a 
great punt return by Arthur Marshall were all very crucial in pulling this one 
out.  

Schottenheimer made 3 big mistakes down the stretch:
1. After KC recovered an Elway fumble at about the Denver 10 with about 6 
minutes left, the game was KC's to lose at that point.  Sure, a TD would've 
definitely sealed it for KC, but the most important thing they should've been
concerned with was running the clock or making Denver use their timouts.  But
instead Schottenheimer opted for passes on 2nd and 3rd down, they both went
incomplete and stopped the clock. 

2. KC leads 19-6 with 5 minutes left.  Denver's at their own 20 and needs
2 touchdowns.  The Chiefs play a soft defense, pretty much saying "we'll give 
you all the underneath stuff but you're gonna use alot of time."  The problem
is they didn't make Denver use quite enough time nor did they force the Broncos
to use any timeouts.  If the Chiefs wouldn't have gotten so conservative and
stayed in their regular defense chances are Denver would not have moved 80
yards so easily.  Hell, we're talking about a Bronco offense that hadn't scored
a TD in 11 quarters.

3. After Denver closed to within 19-13 and forced the Chiefs to punt from their
own end zone, why didn't Schottenheimer order his punter to step out of the end
zone?  Denver still would've needed a TD to win, and KC would've gained close
to 30 yards, assuming the returns are equal.  See, KC punted from their own 6
if I recall but the punter stands about 15 yards behind the line of scrimmage.
So a free kick from the 20 is like punting from the 35-yard line.


As for the first 55 minutes, Denver's offense is starting to show some 
consistency despite not getting into the end zone.  I'm becoming more impressed
with Rivers and less impressed with Green.  The defense held the KC running
somewhat in check, but there wasn't nearly enough pressure on Krieg.  If you
give a mediocre QB like Krieg or Schroeder time they're gonna look great.


Joe
36.1233ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Oct 05 1992 13:524
    Broncos - the ugliest 4-1 team in a LONG time.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1234uh, right :-)ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Oct 05 1992 13:537
    > To quote Dave Logan, the color commentator on the radio
                               ^^^^^                    ^^^^^
    
    Is there some new technology that I missed???
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1235BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 05 1992 14:2712
>    Broncos - the ugliest 4-1 team in a LONG time.
    
You're forgetting about Minnesota.

What's so ugly about 'em anyway?  They had a hell of a comeback yesterday 
without any help from turnovers.  Of course, there was Schottenheimer...


Joe      

    
    
36.1236Before yesterday, ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Oct 05 1992 14:356
    Lets see the last time Denver scored a TD was ????
    
    I would rather have an ugly team an win then look great and lose.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1237ELMAGO::CGRIEGOMon Oct 05 1992 14:511
    Can you say: 	Lucky Bucky, Lucky Bucky, Lucky Bucky..etc...
36.1238SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 05 1992 15:092
       Sounds like the famed 'prevent defense' did in another team eh?
                                  Denny
36.1239No Zone?COMET::FARMERAMon Oct 05 1992 15:217
         Didnt the Chiefs go to a man to man in the end instead of a
    zone-prevent?
                            
    Just curious
    
      Drew
    
36.1240yep, you're rightBSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Oct 05 1992 15:3017
>                     <<< Note 36.1239 by COMET::FARMERA >>>
>                                 -< No Zone? >-
>
>         Didnt the Chiefs go to a man to man in the end instead of a
>    zone-prevent?
>                            
>    Just curious
>    
>      Drew
 
    That's what John said on the radio this morning.  Before the pass to Jackson
    John told him in the huddle that he was the guy if KC went man-to-man.  
    Same with Vance.   The sports guy on KOA said it was a pass to "The Vance"
    from "The John"!  Maybe you had to be there......

	Kevin
36.1241wonder Cacti will rear up....CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 15:3210
 
>    That's what John said on the radio this morning.  Before the pass to Jackson
>    John told him in the huddle that he was the guy if KC went man-to-man.  
>   Same with Vance.   The sports guy on KOA said it was a pass to "The Vance"
>   from "The John"!  Maybe you had to be there......


 Not really I can hurl just as easily reading it now.....

 mike
36.1242Hidden meaning?BSS::NEUZILJust call me FredMon Oct 05 1992 15:5417
 <<< Note 36.1241 by CNTROL::CHILDS "Will Ross, throw George a life-jacket?" >>>
                       -< wonder Cacti will rear up.... >-

 
>>    That's what John said on the radio this morning.  Before the pass to Jackson
>>    John told him in the huddle that he was the guy if KC went man-to-man.  
>>   Same with Vance.   The sports guy on KOA said it was a pass to "The Vance"
>>   from "The John"!  Maybe you had to be there......


> Not really I can hurl just as easily reading it now.....
>
> mike

Mike, it was a joke.  A pass from "The John"! (men's room I'm assuming)!

Kevin
36.1243An equal and opposite reaction.COMET::FARMERAMon Oct 05 1992 16:147
         Any info on Tyron Braxton's health status? I believe he was the
    one who got wolloped by a chiefs receiver. They said they were looking
    at his jaw but there were no follow up reports on how he was.
    
    Thanks 
         Drew
    
36.1244Noone can get that lucky.....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCowboys sip......Mon Oct 05 1992 16:543
    
    
             John Elway is the Anti Christ......:-)
36.1245BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 05 1992 18:574
    RE: Braxton
    He returned to the game after that hit - man, did he ever get leveled!
    
    Joe
36.1246Ho-HumOURGNG::RIGGENThe worst 4-1 team in the NFLMon Oct 05 1992 21:033
Marty Shotthimhigher is more than welcome in Pile High every Sunday possible. 

This game inhaled for 55 minutes. 
36.1247Go Donks!CSC32::SALZERTue Oct 06 1992 18:458
    The last time Denver went to RFK for a monday night affair
    they were big underdogs.  Sound familiar? Then to
    make it official, Mr Ed came down with the flu and Kubiak
    had to start.  The Broncos won that night.  I think
    they look good to win again this monday too.
    
    BoB 
    
36.1248Who's Johnnie's backup?BSS::BSORENSONThe BattlerTue Oct 06 1992 19:4116
    Hi All,
    
    	An interesting quote is in the Colo. Sprgs. Gazette Telegraph
    today.  The situation was in fourth quarter when Elway was sacked for
    the fifth time.  
    
    	"He took a real shot there," Reeves said Monday.  "I was wondering
    whether he was going to continue.  I told (backup) Tommy Maddox to
    start warming up."
    
    	I thaught Shawn Moore was are second string quarter back and Tommy
    Maddox was are third string quarter back.  I wonder if something has
    changed since the season started.  Does anyone have any insight into
    this?
    
    B_Bob
36.1249KC looked like panic/confusion cityGBOVS1::KIRKMANglug..glug...glug....Wed Oct 07 1992 01:148
    Marty Shotthimhigher (tm riggen) is a quality coach, but if that game
    is typical, he should be barred from the stadium on game day.  That
    game was gift wrapped.
    
    Scott
    
    Alright - I'll admitt that some of possesion O-players made some less 
    than intelligent decisions.  B^)
36.1250He's backkkkkk!ICS::FINUCANEThu Oct 08 1992 11:0232
From an old friend....   8-)



Cath


From:	DECWRL::"brooks@hpwarp.wal.hp.com" "George Brooks"  7-OCT-1992 19:56:16.11
To:	ics::finucane
CC:	
Subj:	Cunningham > Elway

Pass that along to the SPORTS faithful. Has JaKe been arrested yet ? :-)

Doc

p.s. I have a new and improved Oilers cap ....
--
George Brooks - HP Clinical Information Systems
"Fill the unforgiving minute ... "

% ====== Internet headers and postmarks (see DECWRL::GATEWAY.DOC) ======
% Received: by enet-gw.pa.dec.com; id AA08827; Wed, 7 Oct 92 16:54:29 -0700
% Received: by crl.dec.com; id AA19048; Wed, 7 Oct 92 10:42:25 -0400
% Received: from hpwadft.wal.hp.com by relay.hp.com with SMTP(16.6/15.5+IOS 3.13) id AA26901; Wed, 7 Oct 92 07:41:10 -0700
% Received: by hpwarp.wal.hp.com(15.11/15.5+IOS 3.22) id AA11695; Wed, 7 Oct 92 10:45:27 edt
% From: George Brooks <brooks@hpwarp.wal.hp.com>
% Message-Id: <9210071445.AA11695@hpwarp.wal.hp.com>
% Subject: Cunningham > Elway
% To: ics::finucane
% Date: Wed, 7 Oct 92 10:45:20 EDT
% Mailer: Elm [revision: 64.9]
36.1251GENRAL::WADEThu Oct 08 1992 12:267
    
    Cath,
    
    	Ask him if RunningPork is his *new* favorite QB.  Hey!  I
    	oughta tm that! :*)
    
    Claybone
36.1252ROYALT::ASHECrocostimpy, Quest que c'est?Fri Oct 09 1992 13:143
    And what's with the Oiler cap... didn't he swear he'd never root for
    them again?
    
36.1253ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Oct 12 1992 15:017
    	What's black & blue (with a hint of orange), and has a stupid grin
    on it's face?
    
    	Bucky....tommorrow morning...HtH! :-)
    
    Carloski
    
36.1254PFSVAX::JACOBAnd I fall down 3 times a dayTue Oct 13 1992 02:594
    Yep, them Donks are definitely in top post season form, ain't they???
    
    JaKe
    
36.1255SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Oct 13 1992 12:073
       AFC East 64
       Donks     3 (or was it 6?)
                                          Denny
36.1256big belly laughs last nightCNTROL::CHILDSWould Saw dump a Harley for a Woman?Tue Oct 13 1992 12:3616
 definately just 3 Denny....

 got to admit Big Bad John was right on with those intys......Kurt Govyea
 looked like the intended receiver....

 did anyone catch Monday nite Matchup on ESPN...

 Sherman and Jaws were doing hatch job on Reeves coaching of Elway. Basically
 said he's never taught Johnny anything....

 Also that Johnny isn't a good QB but just a great athlete playing QB...

 hopefully this is the start of the fall for the Donks....

 mike
36.1257Would ya rather be an ugly 4-2, or a pretty 2-4?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Oct 13 1992 12:4512
36.1258CNTROL::CHILDSWould Saw dump a Harley for a Woman?Tue Oct 13 1992 12:5311
 Let see the Donks have beaten, the Chargers, KC, and the Raiders. I'd hardly
 say that qualifies the AFC West for toughest Division. Also to consider, the
 Raiders, Seahawks, and Chargers all have loosing records. Toughest division
 would probably be the AFC East on the strength of Buffalo and Miami plus
 the up and coming Colts...

 of course the AFC East looses points for the J-E-S-T-S.....

 ;^)    

36.1259Donk Watch Day 1ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Oct 13 1992 13:0613
    Joe Watch Day 1
    Drew Watch Day 1
    Kevin Watch Day 1
    Jeff Watch Day 1
    Tim watch Day 1
    Big_Game watch day 1
    BoB watch day 1
    B_Bob watch day 1
    
    Who'd I miss?
    
    Carloski
    
36.1260Happy now?GENRAL::WADETue Oct 13 1992 13:294
    
    	Me!  Trade Elway!  Fire Reeves!  Boot the Donks outa town! :*)
    
    Claybroon
36.1261FRIPP::HARRISAll this plus a whammy barTue Oct 13 1992 15:214
How many time was Elway intercepted last night?

Jim
36.1262No day at the BeachCOMET::FARMERATue Oct 13 1992 15:2410
    Ya  ha
          ha
            ha 
              ha
                 ha
                    ha
                       Wipe
                            Out!
    I hate the NFC East!
    
36.1263FIRE REEVESOURGNG::RIGGENThe worst 4-2 team in the NFLTue Oct 13 1992 15:2611
Don't fire Reeves Claybroon lets take him hunting up near Steamboat. I think 
I cain find a deliverance dude up there and we cain watch him sqeal like a pig. 
No thats that big boob Handley's impression of coaching in the NFL. 

This is one disapointed doink fan I do enjoy when they win but this team is 
about as soft as Marina's titles.

Bring on the Oilers into Mile High, I know the Pope is visiting next summer 
but I didn't know that he blessed the Stadium. 

Jeff  
36.1264With no help from the "mighty" EaglesBSS::JCOTANCHTue Oct 13 1992 15:2819
Geeez, was that pitiful or what?!?!   I figured they'd lose but I though it
might be a game, at least for awhile.

The offensive line is looking terrible...absolutely terrible.  Over the past
few years they haven't been great pass protectors but have been good at
run-blocking.  Right now they can't do either.  And how many times are the DB's
gonna get burned on play fakes?  And I mean burned bad.  

The good news is that Denver's road games against NFC East teams are over.

It looks like everyone's big bad Eagles aren't all they're cracked up to be.  
They got their butts kicked out in KC in a game that was "not as close as the 
score might indicate."

Hey Carlos, we'll be looking for ya in the Faider file after they play an NFC
East team on the road.


Joe
36.1265Mr. Ed bites throws anotherPBST::BROWNSINGING DOO WAH DIDDYTue Oct 13 1992 15:2910

	Go Broncos !!!


              and take the Nuggets with you!!!



   Cadzilla
36.1266;^)CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLTue Oct 13 1992 15:4420
 Smellway threw two interceptions last night both led to Skins TDs. He
 also got benched for Maddox, I enjoyed that. 

 pretty poor relationship between him and Reeves. They showed them alot
 last night standing side by side without talking to one another. They
 also stated the Reeves told BBJ that he could call his own plays any
 time he wanted too. Of course BBJ chickens out and says no Dan you
 call em'....

 Well I know the league won't do it but seeing how they named him offensive
 player of the week a couple of times, I think we should give him an award
 for defensive player of the week. He made the Skins defense look all world
 last night.

 Joe, I know it was a tough loss but don't be casting stones at Philly. 
 KC's a tough place to play and Philly was due for a letdown after the
 big win against the Sowboys. Also no team ever overcomes the KOH's KOD...

 mike
36.1267ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Oct 13 1992 16:0117
36.1268CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 13 1992 16:266
Yo, Donks fans....

Take heart, you got Ray Handjob's(tm) Jints comin' in in a few weeks.


'SAw
36.1269GENRAL::WADETue Oct 13 1992 17:125
    
    	I can hear the cheers in the stands now:  "Ray must go!", "Can
    	Dan!" :*)
    
    Claybroon
36.1270The Rise and Fall of Mike Shanahan.COMET::FARMERAWed Oct 14 1992 16:4411
         What does everyone think on Denver bringing Mike Shanahan back
    from the 49rs if he would come. It seems to me he was the best thing
    for Elway. Played a good buffer between Reeves and Denver's own Deity.
    
    Drew
    
    P.S.
         Why does Denver even have an offensive coordinator, jeez, we were
    calling those delay runs all night and apparently so was Washington.
    
    AAAAAACCCCCKKKkkkkkkkk!!!
36.1271GENRAL::WADEWed Oct 14 1992 19:057
    
    Drew,
    
    	Reeves IS the offensive coordinator.  In other words, we don't
    	have one! :^)
    
    Claybroon
36.1272Dan The Man... NOT !!!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 14 1992 19:596
     Well,
    
     maybe someone in Denver will finally wake up and fire Reeves.
    he certinly deserves it after mondays performance !!
    
    BG
36.1273Gambling away the future?COMET::FARMERAThu Oct 15 1992 16:2014
         In this mornings paper I was reading that Reevs was leaving the
    option open for revamping Denvers offensive offense to a Washington
    style in which protection is paramount and the number of receivers is
    negated. C'MON Dan, Jee we have one of the best quarter-backs around
    (certainly in Denver's history) and your hedging that the receivers can
    get open before Elway is dumped. Then when he does get the ball away
    the majority of the time he is on the turf anyway. Somebody in that
    organization has got to get a clue. I'm sorry for the editorial here
    but Reeve's has put together some good Denver ball clubs only to
    eventualy get crushed and at the same time endangering a great, (pseudo
    great, possibly great?) quarter back who I believe has given his all
    for this team.
    
    Drew
36.1274the active interception tossing leader CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLThu Oct 15 1992 16:282
 Elway's great if you like a guy who throws more interceptions than TD's...
36.1275Fire DanOURGNG::RIGGENThe worst 4-2 team in the NFLThu Oct 15 1992 16:317
Dan must go, Denver's only run play is a delayed draw up the middle off left
or off right tackle. I don't remember the last time Denver lined up in the 
shotgun on 1st down and ran the ball. How about a 2 back set. 
Denver is gonna start Sammy Smith now we can move the ball all over the field
and fumble on the 1 yrd line. 

Jeff
36.1276REEVES MUST LEEVEQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 15 1992 19:091
    
36.1277Mr X. said....CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLFri Oct 16 1992 11:475
 What gives? You guys used to tell me Reeves was great. One of the top 5
 coaches in the league...

 mike
36.1278They meant Arena football leagueCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Fri Oct 16 1992 12:151
    
36.1279CAN DAN!!! :^)GENRAL::WADEFri Oct 16 1992 12:347
    
    Mikey C.
    
    	What?  Now you're going to argue with us for converting to
    	your views?  Make up your mind!  Do we fire Dan or not? :*)
    
    Claybroon
36.1280CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLFri Oct 16 1992 12:576
 Sure Claybroon. What fun is it, when everyone agree with ya? Notes are
 boring when everyone is in agreement. Of course it does make it easier
 on the Mods...

 ;^)
36.1281DAN THE MAN!! ;^) GENRAL::WADEMon Oct 19 1992 13:014
    
    	That Dan Reeves....Whatta coach!  COTY for sure!
    
    Claybroon  :*)
36.1282No Oil gusherCOMET::FARMERAMon Oct 19 1992 13:026
         Denver does it again, what a telling picture at the end of the
    game with Elway comforting Moon. The announcers even announced the
    drive would happen. I hate Christensen! 
    
    Drew
    
36.1283Another one for the Anti's... :^)BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 19 1992 13:161
    
36.1284Only time I'm notHYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoMon Oct 19 1992 13:514
    
    Not an Anti today.. soooo..  Thanks to BBJ and the rest of the Donks!
    
    /Jeff
36.1285ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Mon Oct 19 1992 14:564
    Where's Doc?
    
    Have to send him mail... anything I should pass along?
    
36.1286Reeves Must Leave !!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 14:5727
    /Jeff...   Great P_Name...
    
     Well,  
    
     Once again the Mighty Donks pull a victory out of their collective 
    a$$es...  This team ain't good enought to go far in the `offs if they
    make it there.  They should lay down now and get some good draft
    choices come nexted(tm) year.  
    
     The almighty GAWD (John: #7) is really something to watch.  they 
    showed him on the sidelines with 1:56 left and you could see that
    he knew he would win the game.  If only he could capture that magic
    and be able to use it for and entire game...  The Donks would be
    unstoppable.  
    
     These type of wins are bad news for the Donks...  No early round 
    lineman and Danny boy will hold on another year.  I was really hoping
    for a truly dismal season...  along the lines of the Patsies or Jesters
    would have been good...  Tha would have garranteeded the ouster of 
    Dan_the_Man_NOT and a shot at some early picks in the upcomming draft.
    
    
     Oh Well,
    
     Go Donks   (They sure make it exciting anyhow !!)
    
    BG
36.1287GENRAL::WADEMon Oct 19 1992 15:164
    
    	Sure Walt.  Tell him Elway>Moon.  But he knew that...
    
    Claybroon
36.1288Moon is Great... John is GAWD !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 15:579
    
     Ditto...
    
     Also,  Ask him if he's talked to Marty Shottenhimer (sp?) of late...
    The Soilers and the Clowns/Chiefs have lots in common now.  All
    have felt the WRATH OF JOHN !!!
    
    BG
    
36.1289Ho hum...OURGNG::RIGGENDENVER JECKYL AND HYDESMon Oct 19 1992 16:257
I only saw the 4th. Did the Houston Defense really stink all game ?

Fire Dan Reeves still damn straight.
Blocked punt ball on the 10, 3 plays for -1 yrds. Kick da bwall Treadwell.
Go up by 6 with 6 minutes left in the game. 


36.1290A search of the record bookBASEX::BROWNMon Oct 19 1992 17:137
    
    
    The local paper in Detroit has found this stat about Elway.
    Elway has now directed 31 game saving drives in his 10 year
    career.
    
    \pjb
36.1291GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseMon Oct 19 1992 18:017
    I thought that the illegal formation calls against the Oilers were
    terrific. Finally, there was an officiating crew that had the testes to
    enforce what's on the books. Also, it drove Todd up the wall, which I
    liked as well.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
36.1292CNTROL::CHILDSMake the smart choice, Andre MarrouMon Oct 19 1992 18:0815
    
    
>    The local paper in Detroit has found this stat about Elway.
>    Elway has now directed 31 game saving drives in his 10 year
>    career.
    
 
 Any chance they put in how many intys he threw earlier in those 31 
 games to put them in that posistion????

 any chance they put in how many where at home (with friendly refs)
 vs. on the road???

 ;^)
36.1293REFSSCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 19 1992 18:142
       You're not implying the famed "Denver death grip" are you Mike?
                                Denny
36.1294Elway and Kragen in `92QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 18:1713
     Mikey,  You're still a Jerk !!!  I love consistency, keep it up !!
    
     To bad the Ninj is gone...  I have this running feud with a fish fan
    here that Elway has significantly more game saving drives , something 
    like 30 to Marino's 22.  He insists that they are now even after 
    Sundays game against the Oilers before which, John was behind.
    Anyone got the real story ???
    
    
    Inquiring Minds And All That
    
    
    BG
36.1295more consistency ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSMake the smart choice, Andre MarrouMon Oct 19 1992 18:2314
    
>     To bad the Ninj is gone...  I have this running feud with a fish fan
>    here that Elway has significantly more game saving drives , something 
>    like 30 to Marino's 22.  He insists that they are now even after 
>    Sundays game against the Oilers before which, John was behind.
>    Anyone got the real story ???
    
    
  It's simple Big Game. Elway is ahead of Marino. Why? Because Marino
  does more for his team in the first three quarters so his team doesn't
  need him to rally them.....Elway should bend over and bark like a dog
  for the defense which keeps him with in shouting distance....

 mike
36.1296SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 19 1992 18:305
       As a matter a fact Will McDonough had a story yesterday about this
    exact topic. I'll post the numbers tomorrow. Elway was first, and
    Staubach, Montana and Marino behind him.
                                 Denny
    
36.1297NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 19 1992 18:347
    
    Who cares?  As Mike says, it's a bogus stat.  Underachieve for three
    quarters, then pull some of the games out.  The greatest teams and QBs
    never have to rely on such theatrics...
    
    glenn
    
36.1298CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 18:424
Oh, so it's kind of like in the same category as inflated stats and
such....

I get it!
36.1299refs call nothing against home team in laST ED 2mins.CNTROL::CHILDSMake the smart choice, Andre MarrouMon Oct 19 1992 18:458
>> Oh, so it's kind of like in the same category as inflated stats and
>> such....


 yup and definately effected by Park Effects....

 mike
36.1300John Elway = Gawd !!! / or Mr. Ed !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 18:5313
    
     Denny,
    
     An official note would be appreciated...  I'd love to end all of this 
    Fish babble once and for all.
    
    All others,  Childs etc...
    
     You're just jealous,  Elway is the greatest of all time and you're
    just pissed because he ain't playing for your team!   read `em weep
    boys...  Elway number one in come back victories.
    
    BG
36.1301PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Mon Oct 19 1992 18:558
    Sombody give Big'N'Lame a multi-pack of 'Shrooms?????
    
    Elway, best of all time, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
    I just pi$$ed my pants laughing at that one.
    
    Oh, Big'N'Lame, you slay me!!!
    
    JaKe
36.1302PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 19 1992 19:003
36.1303SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 19 1992 19:204
       I'll be at the Hall a Fame on Sat. I'm going to take pictures for
    you guys of the spaces they have reserved there for Mr Ed and Phil
    Simms. I mean they must have them ready already right?
                                    Denny
36.1304Hall Of Fame only a matter of time for John, SB or No SB !QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 19:268
    Count on it !!!  Elway is a Hall Of Fame QB.  The greatest of all
    time. (I hope Jake Pi$$ed his pants again)  
    
    BG
    
    Donks ROOL !!!
    
    
36.1305CNTROL::CHILDSMake the smart choice, Andre MarrouMon Oct 19 1992 19:287
 Denny, I seriously doubt they have space reserved for Phil Simms nor does
 he deserve one. Elway on the other hand is already there. Look for the
 white Porclein Bowl with the American Standard label on it.....


 mike
36.1306SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 19 1992 19:292
       Don't let dINzy hear you talk about Simms like that!
                                   Denny
36.1307PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Mon Oct 19 1992 19:3411
    I cain see it now,
    
    "Ladies and Gentlemen, at this spot, you cain see the exhibit for a guy
    who choked in the Super Bowl like a dog sucking down chicken bones ,
    
    John "Mr. Ed" Elway
    
    The next exhibit has been reserved for his teeth."
    
    JaKe
    
36.1308Pirates and Leyland right up there in biggest chocker standingsQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 19:426
    
     Hey Fake...  Git back to the Pirates note if ya wanna talk about
    choking.  They've done a great job of it in recent years.  Your
    short term memory leave much to be desired...   NAAAA   GIT !!!!
    
    BG
36.1309PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 19 1992 19:454
    Sorry, BG, but I'll have to leap to Jake's defense here and say at
    least the Pirates have looked good in going down to defeat.  Unlike the
    Broncos, the Buccos have at least looked like they deserved to be
    playing in a championship game.
36.1310does the "The all showup if it's a blowout" mean somethin'?CNTROL::CHILDSLegalize Drugs &amp; win the warMon Oct 19 1992 19:455
 Atleast they made a good accounting for themselves BG...Donk loss on the other
 hand inspire great jokes.....

 mike
36.1311PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Mon Oct 19 1992 19:4812
    At least the Pirates didn't give up 34 runs in the second inning!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    Lessee, what's the closest score the Donks have had in a Super Bowl???
    
    The ones with Mr. Ed have all been MAJOR blowouts, ain't they???
    
    He cain't bring a team back from 35 point deficits, cain he???
    
    JaKe
    
36.1312A Loss is A Loss !!! no one ever says "that was a great loss"QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 19:5411
    
     No...  And Ed can't play both sides of the ball either.  The donks
    got blown out of the SB's because they had no defense, Not because Ed
    choked...
    
    BG
    
    P.s.  The Braves are in the World Serious,  Not the Pirates.
    
    
          
36.1313PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Mon Oct 19 1992 20:1016
    
    >> No...  And Ed can't play both sides of the ball either.  The donks
    >>got blown out of the SB's because they had no defense, Not because Ed
    >>choked...
    
    I don't seem to remember the Donks scoring high amounts of points, but
    I do remember a bunch of "3 & outs" and turnovers, yes, interceptions
    included.  If they had any kind of offense show up fer the Super Bowls,
    they'd keep their own defense off the freakin' field by keeping the
    damned ball.
    
    Face it Big'N'Lame, the Donks, WHOLE TEAM that is, choked like Linda
    Lovelace before she learned the technique.
    
    JaKe
    
36.1314Can't BLAM Elway For SB Losses !!! BLAM Dan & Co.QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 20:4613
    
     Kinda hard to pass the ball when you "o" line is out weighed by 30
    lbs.  and that, fake is no ones falt but Danny Reeves and the Bronco
    Brain Truss.  Elway don't pick the team...  he only carries Dan's 
    mistakes on his back.  Oh,  Add a new one too...  Tommy Maddox !!
    Jhon will carry that one til the end of his career which because
    of Dan uncanny ability to $%^&$%^*^&% a draft pick may be sonner
    than later.
    
    
    HTH
    
    BG
36.1315Here they are folksOURGNG::RIGGENDENVER JECKYL AND HYDESMon Oct 19 1992 21:2932
1. 1983 21-19 over Baltimore Elway throws 3 4thqtr TD's the last a 26yd'er 
with 44 seconds to Gerald Wilhite.
2. 1984 26-19 against N.E 8 play 78yds 
3. 1984 16-13 against S.D. 10 play 77yds Winder with .38 seconds left. 
4. 1984 16-13 against S.D. 40yds  f.g. 
5. 1985 44-28 against Atlanta behind 28-27 Elway throws 2 td's and a f.g. 
6. 1985 17-16 against S.F. yes the Snowball game Montana won this game.
7. 1985 30-24 against S.D. 48yds for a f.g to tie Denver wins in O.T. 
8. 1985 31-23 against Pittsburgh 58yds Steve Sewell  run for a 24-23 lead.
9. 1985 14-13 against K.C. 8 play 59yds Winder 1 yd T.D. 22 sec
10 1985 27-24 against Seattle 10 points in the 4th. 
11 1986 38-36 against Raiders 39 yds pass to Gene Lang. 
12 1986 23-20 against Cleveland O.T. the DRIVE. 
13 1987 31-29 against Chicago Monday night 61 yd drive
14 1987 31-20 against N.E. Never in doubt.
15.1987 38-33 against Cleveland the "FUMBLE"
16.1988 16-13 against S.F. O.T. 
17.1989 16-10 against S.D 11 play 74 yds Bobby Humphrey.
18.1989 24-21 against Seattle 
19.1989 24-23 against Pittsburgh Playoff game Crowd noise disturbs Bubby
20.1989 16-13 over K.C. 72 yds for a time is out F.G 
21.1990 24-23 "                                     "
22.1990 34-31 against Seattle 
23.1990 27-17 against Indianapolis 
24.1991 19-16 against K.C. 
25.1991 9-6 over N.E. who cares
26.1991 17-7 against Cleveland 
27.1991 24-19 against Phoenix
28.1991 26-24 aginst Houston Playoff last year. 
29 1992 17-13 Raiders
30.1992 20-19 K.C. 
31.1992 27-21 Houston
36.1316Meaningless stat anyhow.HYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoTue Oct 20 1992 11:1210
    
    re: -1
    
    The "fumble" game shouldn't be listed..  Bronco's were never behind in
    that one.  
    
    I find many of those to be questionable, anyhow...  any game won by
    7 or more points can't be a "final drive" to win it.
    
    /Jeff  
36.1317Buccos = BrownsGENRAL::WADETue Oct 20 1992 12:2613
    
    re. way back
    
    glenn,
    
    	So, you don't consider the Staubach era Cowboys teams great?
    	I used to loathe him cuz he was always bringing the pokes
    	back from sure defeat.
    
    	I always thought the one measure of an athlete's greatness was
    	how they performed in the clutch.
    
    Claybroon
36.1318CNTROL::CHILDSLegalize Drugs &amp; win the warTue Oct 20 1992 12:365
 Most of those games they were loosing to teams that they had no business
 loosing too. Face it Big Game, John is no HOF'er...

 mike
36.1319Staubach was great for the whole game...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 20 1992 12:4230
    >	So, you don't consider the Staubach era Cowboys teams great?
    >	I used to loathe him cuz he was always bringing the pokes
    >	back from sure defeat.
    >
    >	I always thought the one measure of an athlete's greatness was
    >	how they performed in the clutch.
    
    The Staubach-era Cowboys were great.  You see, each of them have these 
    two rings on their fingers that attest to that fact, and when they didn't 
    win the big one, such as against the Steelers, at least they showed honor 
    and valor in defeat.  HTH.
    
    The difference is that when the Cowboys needed Staubach late in a game, 
    like Elway, he came through, but when they didn't need him to rescue
    them against inferior opponents, he didn't stumble around for three 
    quarters to leave the game to dramatics (I know, I know, this is the
    defense's fault, or the O-line's, or Coach Reeve's.  Anybody but John
    Elway's, in spite of Elway's often less-than-inspiring *full game* 
    performances, like the dogs he turned in in his last two Super Bowls).
    
    "Game-winning drives" has bogus pseudo-stat written all over it.  Does
    the NFL officially define such a stat and record it?  [No.]  How many
    opportunities has Elway had compared to Staubach?  Who defines the
    criteria?  [Not the NFL; probably the Broncos' PR staff.]  Who really
    cares?  Yes, John Elway might be the best 4th-quarter quarterback of
    all time, but that doesn't make him the best quarterback, period.
    
    glenn
    
36.1320CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 20 1992 13:027
Not only that, but how many of those teams mistakenly believe in a
prevent defense?

Hell, even I could engineer a drive against a prevent defense!


8^)
36.1321MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrTue Oct 20 1992 13:064
    
     In all of this talk about "come-back quarterbacks" both here and in
    McDonough's article, I have yet to see Ken Stabler's name mentioned.
    Didn't he pretty much *invent* the two-minute drill ?
36.1322Risking some NFC East crowNROPST::MPO12::MCFALLThis is the end of the innocenceTue Oct 20 1992 13:157
	All those come from behind victories, and not one against an NFC East
team... OF course, Giants visit Broncos for a Sunday Night game in 3 weeks, 
TRBC will probably "hand" Mr. Elway another one. Also, Jeff, how did 
Elway throw that Field Goal against Atlanta in 1985 ? :^)
	
	Jim M
36.1323two moreJARETH::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesTue Oct 20 1992 13:1911
    > In all of this talk about "come-back quarterbacks" both here and in
    > McDonough's article, I have yet to see Ken Stabler's name mentioned.
    > Didn't he pretty much *invent* the two-minute drill ?
    
    Stabler was an excellent come-back quarterback, as was his predecessor
    in Oakland, George Blanda (not only would Blanda take his team down the
    field in the closing minutes, he'd also kick the game-winning field
    goal!).
    
    
    py
36.1324made a bundle betting the other teammmCNTROL::CHILDSU.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad GeorgeTue Oct 20 1992 13:3210
    
>     In all of this talk about "come-back quarterbacks" both here and in
>    McDonough's article, I have yet to see Ken Stabler's name mentioned.
>    Didn't he pretty much *invent* the two-minute drill ?


 but Kenny was just playing with the spread.....

 ;^)
36.1325not exactly a StablerFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictTue Oct 20 1992 15:241
    Blanda is the all-time leader in interceptions with 277.
36.1326a couple of games or seasons behind?CNTROL::CHILDSU.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad GeorgeTue Oct 20 1992 15:266
>>    Blanda is the all-time leader in interceptions with 277.

 How far behind is Elway???

 mike
36.1327MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrTue Oct 20 1992 15:273
    
     When you play as long as George did, you're going to be the all-time
    leader in a bunch of categories.
36.1328another INT leaderFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictTue Oct 20 1992 15:281
    I think Jim Hart is up there too.  Around 250.
36.1329MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the Kid...Tue Oct 20 1992 15:319
re -.1
	You beat me to it... Wasn't Blanda in his mid 40s when he finally
	called it quits.  I know he wasn't quarterbacking the last few years,
	merely kicking extra points, but I'd have to guess he must have been
	the oldest quaterback to have played.  If not the oldest, at least
	in the top three.


	Bill
36.1330with little Charlie Tollar...CNTROL::CHILDSU.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad GeorgeTue Oct 20 1992 15:335
 I might be mistaken but I think Blanda was 46 when he finally hung them up..
 I used to love to watch him as an Oiler.

 mike
36.1331CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 20 1992 15:397
How old is Jackie Slater of the Rams?

He's one of the three oldest guys in the league, and I'm betting he's
probably the oldest guy with a "real" football job....


'Saw
36.1332exQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 20 1992 16:2511
    
    Riggen's stats prove Elway's the best come back QB of all time !!
    No question this man will be in the HOF.  In Fact,  I'm sure that
    you will see that spot reserved for him already.  All this Anti-Donk
    dribble is making me sick.  You've blinded yourself to one of the
    greatest to ever play the game.  Elway is Gawd...  and theres a list
    of 31 teams that will testify to that a few notes back.
    
    FWIW
    
    BG
36.1333LAGUNA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownTue Oct 20 1992 16:556
    
    BG, it is not 31 teams, CLeveland was listed there a couple hunnerd
    times.
    
    8^)
    Brews
36.1334GENRAL::WADETue Oct 20 1992 17:3738
>    The Staubach-era Cowboys were great.  You see, each of them have these 
>    two rings on their fingers that attest to that fact, and when they didn't 
>    win the big one, such as against the Steelers, at least they showed honor 
>    and valor in defeat.  HTH.
 
	Ah, we're talking about rings now.  No arguement from me there.
	And I'm sure Elway wasn't trying to win those bowls he played in.
	He has no honor or valor!
   
>    The difference is that when the Cowboys needed Staubach late in a game, 
>    like Elway, he came through, but when they didn't need him to rescue
>    them against inferior opponents, he didn't stumble around for three 
>    quarters to leave the game to dramatics (I know, I know, this is the

	Well, I'm not going to try to figure out which QB had the highest
	number of comebacks over better or "inferior" opponents.  I'm
	sure they both have their fair share of *quality* comebacks. :*)
	Also, are you implying that in Elway's comebacks he laid down
	for 3 quarters and then decided to play?  Sounds like it.  

>    "Game-winning drives" has bogus pseudo-stat written all over it.  Does
>    the NFL officially define such a stat and record it?  [No.]  How many
>    opportunities has Elway had compared to Staubach?  Who defines the
>    criteria?  [Not the NFL; probably the Broncos' PR staff.]  Who really
>    cares?  Yes, John Elway might be the best 4th-quarter quarterback of
>    all time, but that doesn't make him the best quarterback, period.
 
	I agree.  Tis a stoopid stat.  I also agree that he ain't even
	close to being the best QB ever.  You have me confused with
	Big Game!

	I could care less if he makes it to the HoF.  I've enjoyed
	watching him play and that's all that matters to me.  I think
	the HoF is bogus anyway.  Football is a TEAM sport which relies
	heavily on their coaching staffs.  Witness Barry Sanders this
	year minus 2 starting OL's and Mouse Davis......

Claybroon    
36.1335LUDWIG::WHITEHAIRTue Oct 20 1992 18:319
    
    	This Eitherway crap...makes me sick!!!
    
    
    
    
    		PPPPPEEEEEUUUUUUUUUKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
    
    
36.1336PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Tue Oct 20 1992 18:368
    Hal,
    
    Now ya know how we felt with "Bernice this, and Bernice that"!!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
36.1337NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 20 1992 18:4839
    
>>    The Staubach-era Cowboys were great.  You see, each of them have these 
>>    two rings on their fingers that attest to that fact, and when they didn't 
>>    win the big one, such as against the Steelers, at least they showed honor 
>>    and valor in defeat.  HTH.
 
 >	Ah, we're talking about rings now.  No arguement from me there.
 >	And I'm sure Elway wasn't trying to win those bowls he played in.
 >	He has no honor or valor!
    
    We were talking Cowboys versus Broncos at this point.  You asked me if
    I thought that the Staubach-era Cowboys were great.  The answer is yes.
    As for the Broncos, no, I don't believe that they showed honor or valor
    in their Super Bowl defeats.  Losing is one thing, but I don't think 
    they even came close to playing to their abilities, Elway included.
    
    >	Well, I'm not going to try to figure out which QB had the highest
    >	number of comebacks over better or "inferior" opponents.  I'm
    >	sure they both have their fair share of *quality* comebacks. :*)
    >	Also, are you implying that in Elway's comebacks he laid down
    >	for 3 quarters and then decided to play?  Sounds like it.  
    
    Not implying anything; I'm saying outright that this is the kind of
    performance I've seen from Elway many, many times.  Last year's 
    playoff game against Houston was a perfect example.  No speculation 
    on Elway's motives or anything; I don't think it's intentional, just 
    a familiar "pattern" (as President Bush might say once and then repeat
    100 times over).
    
    >	I could care less if he makes it to the HoF.  I've enjoyed
    >	watching him play and that's all that matters to me.  I think
    >	the HoF is bogus anyway.  Football is a TEAM sport which relies
    >	heavily on their coaching staffs.  Witness Barry Sanders this
    >	year minus 2 starting OL's and Mouse Davis......
    
    Agreed, and I think you have proper perspective...
    
    glenn
    
36.1338GENRAL::WADETue Oct 20 1992 18:4912
    
    	I don't recall, in great detail, Elway's performance in
    	the playoff game with Houston.  I seem to remember Houston
    	having a big lead at halftime.
    
    	Let me tell you what I see alot of:  Denver is up by 7, a
    	turnover occurs deep in the opponents territory, Reeves
    	calls 3 running plays (possibly a swing pass in the flat for
    	a loss), Denver settles for a FG.  NO KILLER INSTINCT!  I
    	feel the blame lies with Reeves......
    
    Claybroon
36.1339PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 20 1992 18:517
36.1340enuff?GENRAL::WADETue Oct 20 1992 19:0615
    
    glenn,
    
    	No fair modifying your entries after I already replied! :*)
    
    	Anyhoo, I meant "great" in terms of comebacks.  I saw Roger
    	the Dodger do it many times.....
    
    Mac,
    
    	I only remember him (T) and his G-string thang.  I do remember
    	Elway's heroics at the end, but not much of what happened in
    	the first half (other than Houston having a big lead).
    
    Claybroon
36.1341CNTROL::CHILDSU.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad GeorgeTue Oct 20 1992 19:098
case of selective memory there Claybroon????

not to worry we all suffer from it....

Elway sucked though in the first half take my word for it...

;6)
36.1342reeves game Plan = Smoke and Mirrors !!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 20 1992 20:2225
    
     Elway was terrible in that game...  Boy that brings back great
    memories of Mr T...  He was way way way out on a limb after that 
    round of Elway Magic.  I still have some of the personal mail that 
    T sent me at the time...  I ought to post some of the dribble he 
    sent me just for old time sake.  The man was a master at his craft.
    (I have yet to figure out exactly what that was, I'm sure we all
    have our own thoughts on it though)
    
    
     I have to agree  with Claybroon...  The trouble with the Donks 
    lies squarely on the sholders of Dan Reeves, Not Mr. Ed !!
    
     Hey did any one see where the Donks are out searching franticly
    for a punter due to Horans injury...???  I don't know why,  Brad
    Delviso (sp?) seem to play well durring the rest of the game.  He 
    had four punts for a 48.2 yrd avg or something like that.  Again,
    Danny has his head where the sun don't shine !!
    
    BG   Elway is GAWD !!!!!!!   Childs is BOZO !!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    
    
36.1343GENRAL::WADETue Oct 20 1992 20:305
    
    	Nah Mike, I try to concentrate on the W's and L's.  That
    	game was a W! :*)
    
    Claybroon
36.1344Factx are faxOURGNG::RIGGENDENVER JECKYL AND HYDESTue Oct 20 1992 20:405
The trick to this whole enchilada is most of these games are in MILE HIGH 
stadium. That is 5280 feet above sea level for you flatlanders. This makes any
athelete suffer from a lack of oxygen after 45 minutes of chasing Mr. John 
Elway and I mean chase cause the O-line has larger holes than my grandma's 
support stockings. 
36.1345ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Tue Oct 20 1992 20:433
    The oldest current NFL player (I think) is Steve "Don't Pay the
    Ferryman" DeBerg....
    
36.1346BSS::JCOTANCHTue Oct 20 1992 20:5430
    
>    Yes, John Elway might be the best 4th-quarter quarterback of
>    all time, but that doesn't make him the best quarterback, period.

Very well put.  He's great when you're tied or within striking distance in the 
last few minutes of a game, he's a great scambler, has a great arm, and has
displayed an incredible resistance to injury over the past few years despite
being sacked more than most NFL quarterbacks.  However, he doesn't throw a good
touch pass (most of the time), throws a terrible screen pass, isn't good at the
short passing game, doesn't play-fake well, and has a bad TD-to-int ratio and
therefore bad QB ratings.  And he never will be good at any at any of these
things.   

I don't think it's any coincidence that Elway performs well in the last few
minutes of a game when Denver needs to move downfield quickly and they're
running a wide open offense.  Sure, defense are usually in a prevent, but Elway
thrives on that wide open, unorthodox, broken-play type of an offense and would
be much more effective for 60 minutes instead of 2 if Denver ran this type of
offense all this time.  You have a QB like Elway, you design your offense
around him.  

As for the HOF, I don't think John gets in unless Denver wins a Super Bowl with
him at QB.  He doesn't have nearly the great numbers deserving of being in the
Hall, but with a ring, his good winning percentage, and all the great comebacks
he would probably get in.  A Marino, on the other hand, is a shoo-in even if
Miami never reaches another Super Bowl, let alone win one.


Joe
    
36.1347BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingTue Oct 20 1992 22:0515
    
    I heard Elway say on a talk show that he just loves it when he has to 
    do a comeback like that because everything is so open and it's alot 
    like sandlot.
    
    He's obviously very good at it.
    
    It seems to me that Reeves would attempt to incorporate this open
    sandlot style of play into a game plan so as to take advantage of
    Elway's ability and love for this style of game rather than attempt to
    fit Elway into an old offensive style that Reeves learned 20 years ago
    from Landry.  FYI IMHO.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
36.1348PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Tue Oct 20 1992 22:345
    Elway:==Brister wif big teef
    
    
    JaKe
    
36.1349Reeves Must Leave !!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 21 1992 13:388
    
     Jake = Loud Mouth for Pit !!  Bubba couldn't carry Johns Toof
    Brush...   ;^)
    
     Well said Glenn...  And there we have it,  Reeves is stuck in Never
    Never land.  
    
    BG
36.1350Toof funny!MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the Kid...Wed Oct 21 1992 14:3510
>> Bubba couldn't carry Johns Toof Brush...   ;^)

    It would probably take an entire eleven man squad to pick that sucker up!
    In fact they are considering using it for the Weight lifting event
    in the next Olympics.  ;^)

    Just picture it,  Horseface walks up to it every morning and runs up
    and down beside it rubbing those oversized insisors on it as he goes!

    Bill
36.1351Betters lineCOMET::FARMERAWed Oct 21 1992 16:505
         Does anyone know what the line is for San Diego Sunday? With
    Bernstein out it was surely to change I would believe.
    
    Drew
    
36.1352And Thats About Right !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 21 1992 17:403
    Denver +1 
    
    BG
36.1353ROCK::MURPHYWed Oct 21 1992 20:277
Give the 1. Or give up.  If Denver can't win in SD, they'll never win on
the road (except for, of course, Cleveland and KC)  Was playing poker this
Sunday in Connecticut with some very angry New Yorkers who have yet to discover
the dogma of taking Denver at home.  Elway truly is, as you so eloquently put
it, Gawd...

Murph
36.1354CSC32::SALZERThu Oct 22 1992 01:0914
    HOF is a sore subject with most Donk fans. Sorry to disagree 
    with you BG but #7 doesn't make it either at least at this
    point in time. Sure Fran made it with 3 SB losses but he 
    had other significant qb rankings to give him the needed votes.
    Elway's only legitimate shot at HOF is to win the bowl. If he wins
    the bowl he's a shoo-in. No bowl. No hall. 
    Drive I
    Drive II
    Son of Drive
    Great grandson of Drive III
    etc..............
    
    BoB
    
36.1355Reeves denies looking for new jobPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 22 1992 13:5614
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc,clari.sports.top
Subject: Reeves denies interest in Phoenix job
Date: 21 Oct 92 19:45:22 GMT

	LOS ANGELES (UPI) -- Denver Broncos Coach Dan Reeves said Wednesday he
would not consider leaving the team after the season to coach the
Phoenix Cardinals.
	ESPN reported Reeves is a leading candidate to replace Phoenix Coach
Joe Bugel, whose team is 1-5 and last in the NFC East.
	``There is certainly no interest on my part in going anywhere,''
Reeves told KMPC radio in Los Angeles. ``Where it (the rumor) gets
started, I don't know.''
	Reeves' contract with the Broncos expires at the end of the season.
36.1356TORREY::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownThu Oct 22 1992 14:047
    
    ESPN did not report that, Fred Edelstein did.  THe same Fred EDelstein
    who said Bugel was gone after they lost the sowboys game.  If
    Edelstein's picks were in the KOH, he'd be the only guy picking the
    Gints every time.  ooops
    
    Brews
36.1357only mains play in the desertFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictThu Oct 22 1992 15:247
    Yeah they had Fred on KTAR last night.  The guy is a sports version of
    Rona Barrett.
    
    I'm glad Reeves is staying in Denver.  His collies wouldn't like it
    here.
    
    Mike
36.1358QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 22 1992 15:444
    
     #&#$%^*%^&^%&(%^#$%#$%@^  We'll never get rid of the curse...
    
    BG
36.1359:-0 cuz c=>:*'))CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Thu Oct 22 1992 15:461
    
36.1360CSC32::SALZERThu Oct 22 1992 20:5012
    Revees' most obvious shortcoming to me is his inability
    to long range plan the team.  He also seems to distance 
    himself from his players and communications problems seem
    obvious at times. 
    On the other hand he has made some pretty good decisions too. 
    I never really expected Denver to make any of the bowls he
    got them to. Many expected or even hoped for a disastorous season
    this year to justify booting the guy. Right now he's 5-2 
    and in 1st place. How many other coaches are on the ropes
    with a 1st place team?  
    
    BoB
36.1361Reeves Must Leave !!!1QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 22 1992 21:008
    BoB,
    
     Whats a matta You,  get it together dude...  Reeves is a loser,
    at least when it counts.  I want a ring for this team and would
    love to see john get one as well.  With Dan around that'll never 
    happen.
    
    BG
36.1362BSS::JCOTANCHThu Oct 22 1992 21:4726
>    Revees' most obvious shortcoming to me is his inability
>    to long range plan the team. 

Well, you certainly wouldn't think so by the way he drafted this past spring. 
I still say he drafted Denver's QB of the future a year or two ahead of time.
 
>   On the other hand he has made some pretty good decisions too. 
>    I never really expected Denver to make any of the bowls he
>    got them to. Many expected or even hoped for a disastorous season
>    this year to justify booting the guy. Right now he's 5-2 
>    and in 1st place. How many other coaches are on the ropes
>    with a 1st place team?  
    
Glad to see at least one Denver fan has some sense.
There's alot of things that Dan does that I don't agree with either, but you 
can't argue with his record.  What was Denver expected to do in '89, coming off
an 8-8 season?  [Answer: not a whole lot].  But what did they do?  Go 11-5 and 
become AFC Champions.  What was Denver expected to do in '91, coming off a 5-11
season? [Answer: zilch].  But what did they do?  Go 12-4 and make it all the 
way to the AFC Championship game.  

BG, maybe you'd be happier being a fan of Indy, Tampa, or Seattle, just to name
a few.


Joe
36.1363CNTROL::CHILDSDecked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbestFri Oct 23 1992 12:059
last's years record is nothing to crow about Joe. It was against a last place
schedule. Look at Vikings this year. Even my Giants benefited from an easier
schedule two years ago. And of course one must not forget the weakness of the
AFC in general and favorable treatment at Pile-It-High....

The Donks without a doubt year in and year out are luckiest team in the league

;^)  
36.1364GENRAL::WADEFri Oct 23 1992 12:3216
    
    	Believe it or not Joe, MikeyC. has a coupla good points.
    
    	The thing that irks me about Reeves is that he will not
    	go get Elway a descent line.  What do you think the Broncs
    	chances are if Elway gets hurt?  They are damn lucky he's
    	not hurt already given the number of sacks he's absorbed
    	(not to mention the hits he takes just after releasing the
    	ball).
    
    	I think overall Reeves is good coach and, all kidding aside,
    	I don't think he should be fired.  I just feel that they are
    	letting JohnnyBoy go to waste.  He's probably got 2-3 more
    	good years left and it'll be spent behind a crap line.
    
    Claybroon
36.1365BSS::JCOTANCHFri Oct 23 1992 13:1427
    
>    	The thing that irks me about Reeves is that he will not
>    	go get Elway a descent line.  What do you think the Broncs
>    	chances are if Elway gets hurt?  They are damn lucky he's
>    	not hurt already given the number of sacks he's absorbed
>    	(not to mention the hits he takes just after releasing the
>    	ball).
 
>    	I think overall Reeves is good coach and, all kidding aside,
>    	I don't think he should be fired.  I just feel that they are
>    	letting JohnnyBoy go to waste.  He's probably got 2-3 more
>    	good years left and it'll be spent behind a crap line.
    

Clay, did you read my note a few back?  Like I said, there's alot of things
Reeves does I don't agree with either, and one of the them is how he utilizes
John.  He wants to establish a running game and a ball-control offense.  Hey,
I'd love to see that, but when you've got a sandlot QB and a terrible offensive
line it's not exactly the best system to go with.  

One thing alot of people forget is that Reeves has drafted a couple of linemen
high in the draft that didn't stick around.  Hinton was a 1st-round pick back
in '83 but was involved in the Elway trade and there was Perry a few years ago
but he couldn't keep himself out of trouble.


Joe  
36.1366GENRAL::WADEFri Oct 23 1992 13:225
    
    	Yeah, I read it.  I just wanted to let you know that there
    	was at least 2 Bronco fans with some sense! :*)
    
    Claybroon
36.1367ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinFri Oct 23 1992 13:2615
    I find it hard to believe that the doinks have had a crappy line
    throughout Bucky's career, and yet they still ain't got no rings.
    
    The way I figure it, Reeves has become the scapegoat despite his
    ability to turn average/sub-average teams into contendahs, simply
    because admiring doink fans refuse to accept the fack that Bucky, in
    all his splendor, still leaves much to be desired. Maybe if Bucky would
    come off his high horse (and by the way, it's very difficult to tell
    which one's which) and try to work with Reeves a little, you know kinda
    like a team, then maybe the doinks could get the ever elusive ring for
    both Bucky and Reeves (and the other 43 players you hardly hear
    anything about). JMHO.
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
36.1368TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelFri Oct 23 1992 14:377
    
    re .1364 by Clay-wad
    
    I think Reeves HAS given Mr ED a descent line.  Once the ball is
    snapped, they all fall down.
    
    Brews
36.1369AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowFri Oct 23 1992 14:561
    
36.1370GENRAL::WADEFri Oct 23 1992 15:019
    
    	Heh, heh.  I saw that after I entered it.  I left it in
    	to see who would snap it up.
    
    	Denver actually has what I call a sentry line.  You know,
    	look-outs.  LOOK OUT JOHN!
    
    Claybroon
    
36.1371donks wins = anti's from woodworkQUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesFri Oct 23 1992 19:4013
       Alot of talk,  but nothing "new" getting said!
    
       Don't be suprised to see the donks lose this weekend.  SD has a
    decent defense (stats wise),  and denver has had trouble stopping the
    run at times this year.
    
      Who knows,  it might be another FG 12-6 type of game.
    
      Mark Jackson says denvers offense is coming around,  and this weekend
    might just tell the tale.
    
      Tim
    
36.1372Pardon the pun.CSC32::SALZERFri Oct 23 1992 22:019
    I hate to beat a dead horse but it seems to me that most
    discussions about Mr Ed are brought on by the anti-Donks(tm)
    But even they have to admit screaming at their TV's on 
    occasion and feeling that terrible sinking feeling in their
    stomach when he breaks out of the pocket.  Don't confuse
    yourself with stats and qb rankings either. Leave the 
    big numbers to Marino and the others. 
    
    BoB  
36.1373everyone's doing itFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictSat Oct 24 1992 01:541
    Go ahead Bob and beat that horse.
36.1374(8^)*CSOA1::JACOBMets in '93Mon Oct 26 1992 04:1713
    Boy, if replay was still being used, Mr. Ed woulda got another chance
    at bringing the Donks from a big deficit, BUT, the Donks got hosed on
    the INT call at the end and lost.
    
    Breaks my heart
    NOT!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Mr. So_Damned_Great and the Donks lose AGAIN, HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
36.1375FDCV07::KINGI've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!!Mon Oct 26 1992 11:553
36.1376BSS::JCOTANCHBeat NebraskaMon Oct 26 1992 14:2724
It's a miracle - Elway didn't get sacked once!

Missed the 2nd half.  It figures that when the offense decides to play a pretty
decent game that the defense gives up more than its share of big plays and Stan
Humphries has a career day.  

6-2 at the midway point would've been great, but 5-3 is pretty good.  Thanks to
KC getting unexpectedly upset last night, Denver still holds a 1-game lead in
the division, but will be a game behind Houston in the race for a bye in the
first round of the playoffs if the Oilers win next week (Looks like I'll be a 
Pittsburgh fan again next week).  Denver has taken care of business at home 
with a 4-0 record, but things are different on the road.  I felt before the 
season a 4-4 road record would've been great, but being only 1-3 and road games
left at LA, Buffalo, and KC, a 4-4 road record will take a minor miracle.

Glancing at the schedules of Denver, KC, and LA, KC probably has the easiest 
of the 3 but only slightly.  Denver still has to play at KC and at LA; the
Faids still have to play at Philly and at Washington.  And add a 4th team to
the race - the Chargers.  With their 3-game winning streak they can move into a
tie with KC at 4-4 with a win next week, and their schedule is pretty soft the
rest of the way.


Joe
36.1377QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Oct 26 1992 15:2623
      Congrats to the Chargers and their fans.  The Chargers dominated the
    1st half.
    
      The officiating sucked.  There were at least 5 bad calls,  and it
    went both ways.
    
      Not sure why Elway was trying to get a TD in that last series that he
    was picked (out of the endzone).  He had plenty of time to just drive
    it down and at least get in FG range.  O'well!
    
      Elway had good protection yesterday!  The running game came around a
    little bit in the 2nd half.  Keep Green on the bench!
    
      Go from shotgun on 1st down more often!
    
      Rivers had a great game.  They are finally using him!
    
    
      Next week off and then its the jets and gints.  It should be 2 more
    wins at home.
    
       Tim
    
36.1378CNTROL::CHILDSDecked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbestMon Oct 26 1992 15:334
 3 interceptions, that my buddy Johnny....

 ;^)
36.1379Stripes take another game from a road team !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 26 1992 15:5510
    
     Another typical Donks game...  Piss an easy win right down their
    leggs. Oh well,  it's a tight race in the west,  could make for an
    interesting late season.   
    
    Big Game
    
    P.s.  That INT call in the endzone with BS...  Not even close.  That
          kinda crap is a great reason to bring back Instant Replay.  Donks
    	  got burned by the Zebras...  No question !!!
36.1380CNTROL::CHILDSDecked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbestMon Oct 26 1992 17:3716
      >   That INT call in the endzone with BS...  Not even close.  That
      >   kinda crap is a great reason to bring back Instant Replay.  Donks
      >  got burned by the Zebras...  No question !!!


   Well now the refs screwed the Donks? I guess there must be a God somewhere.
   It'll still take atleast 100 more screwing of this types for the Donks to
   be even of being on the wrong side of the call. Hopefully those 100 will
   happen sooner than later......

   ;^)

  ps. even if the call was bad, the pass was even worst cause it was in the
      defenders hands....

  mike
36.1381CSOA1::JACOBMets in '93Mon Oct 26 1992 18:3715
36.1382sigh of relief in these partsACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93 == Jake's p-nameMon Oct 26 1992 18:466
    Had I lost this p-name bet it would have made the p-name in the spring
    look like a heavenly god-send. This time it would have been something
    like I love the Bucs so much I am moving to Pittsburgh - gag!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1383PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 26 1992 18:572
    It's not the refs fault that the Broncos dug themselves a 17 point
    hole.
36.1384DECWET::METZGERMon Oct 26 1992 19:0510
Big Game,

Replay wouldn't have overruled that call. The officials decided that the
defender was pushed out of bounds by the wide receiver. IMO it was a 
wicked bad call but Instant replay wouldn't have changed anything.

Yet another unreversible play...

Metz
36.1385Jerry Sieman is a gambler... Got to be !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 26 1992 19:5414
    
     Can It Mac !!!!  ;^)
    
    
        Metz...  That wasn't the only "Wicked Bad Call" that couldn't have
    been reversed by IR.  Did anyone get a gander at the Pass Interference
    call against Mark Jackson...  He never touched Blaylock.  I'm telling
    you,  when I see games like this I wonder if HOOT wasn't correct in his
    claims of fixed games and the NFL being like the WWF.  What a crock !!
    If I were Bobby Cox,  I'd have been ashamed to look Reeves in the eye.
    
    Broncos Still on top !!
    
    BG
36.1386NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 26 1992 19:5917
    
    > If I were Bobby Cox,  I'd have been ashamed to look Reeves in the eye.
    
    Bobby Cox was in on it too?  Wow, loses the Series on Saturday night
    (following /Don's script), and right back at it, game-fixing on Sunday 
    afternoons.
    
    Mac's right.  The Broncos did their usual three-quarters underachievement
    routine, and the great John Elway's not supposed to leave things to
    chance like that.  Does this game get entered into the 4th-quarter
    comeback list, with an asterisk for "woulda been 'cept for da refs!"? 
    
    ;-)
    
    glenn
    
    
36.1387ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93 == Jake's p-nameMon Oct 26 1992 20:028
    
    > Does this game get entered into the 4th-quarter
    > comeback list, with an asterisk for "woulda been 'cept for da refs!"?
    
    Glenn, only Ford Frick can asterisk things.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1388PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 26 1992 20:053
36.1389Zebras in vegas blowing sundays earnings !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 26 1992 20:376
    Big Boo Boo...  That should have read Ross instead of Cox...
    Me stupid !!
    
    And don't you forget it MAC !!!  ;^)
    
    BG
36.1390CNTROL::CHILDSDecked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbestTue Oct 27 1992 13:593
BG, even if replay was around they don't use it on pass interference calls.
They only uses were to verify td, in-bounds, receptions and fumbles...
36.1391You Got a reading problem ??QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 27 1992 14:2622
    
    
    
    
    
    Mikey...  I think you ought to reread what I wrote...  Get a Clue !
    
    BG
    
  							       ^^^^^^  
>>        Metz...  That wasn't the only "Wicked Bad Call" that couldn't have
>>    been reversed by IR.  Did anyone get a gander at the Pass Interference
>>    call against Mark Jackson...  He never touched Blaylock.  I'm telling
>>    you,  when I see games like this I wonder if HOOT wasn't correct in his
>>    claims of fixed games and the NFL being like the WWF.  What a crock !!
>>    If I were Bobby Cox,  I'd have been ashamed to look Reeves in the eye.
    
    Broncos Still on top !!
    
    BG

    
36.1392ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Oct 27 1992 19:2915
36.1393PFSVAX::JACOBMets in '93Tue Oct 27 1992 19:3214
    
    >>snivelling. Elway's a joke, I cain't believe some people actually think
    >>he's HoF bound. By the way, I wunder if there's anyway we could get
    
    I personally think he's HoF bound
    
    Hall of Feces, that is
    
    
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
36.1394Squeelers will show true colors and fold soon too !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 27 1992 20:408
    
    Hey !!!  thats enough of that crap (hehehe)  You girls get outa
    here and get back to the squeelers/faiders topic where ya belong.
    The Donks got burned by the Zebras...  But...  We're still in
    1st place Carlittleone and the faiders are starting their dive
    to the cellar early...  not far to go from where they are either.
    
    BG
36.1395AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowWed Oct 28 1992 15:111
    
36.1396CSC32::SALZERThu Oct 29 1992 00:4113
    
    I didn't see the game or see the play but I have seen enough 
    games and plays this season to know something has to be 
    done about getting the calls right.  It's a tricky problem.
    
    Fortunately the Raiders and Chiefs and Seahawks lost too
    giving the Chargers a 1 game gain on everybody. The 
    Raiders continue to inch their way to the cellar. 
    At the half way point, none of these teams look good. 
    A week off then hosting the Jets may be just what the
    Dr. ordered to get the 2nd half rolling. 
    
    BoB
36.1397It'll be painfully obvious by the end of the seasonHYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoThu Oct 29 1992 11:367
    
    The AFC West is overrated!   After a few off years the real power of
    the AFC is shifting back into the Central.  
    
    HtH,
    
    /Jeff
36.1398QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 29 1992 13:529
    GIVE IT A REST JEFF !!!
    
     Where do you see any "POWER" in the central division ??  More like
    a bunch of wimpy girly-mon open faced sandwich eaten limp wristed
    losers.
    
    ;^)
    
    BG
36.1399HYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoThu Oct 29 1992 15:448
    
    BG..  please refer to  56.1720
    
    Now we'll probably hear the division refered to as "balanced"..   
    
    AFC Central Rooolz.   
    
    /Jeff
36.1400cellar dwellersELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Nov 03 1992 13:2211
36.1401Jets on sundayCSC32::SALZERTue Nov 03 1992 17:128
    Your right Carlos. I stand corrected. The Raiders started 
    in the cellar after playing the Donks.  You also hit
    close to something I don't like too much.  I hope I'm wrong
    but Denver could be ripe for a 2nd half collapse. Either way,
    I dont see any of the AFC west teams doing well in the playoffs
    at this point in time.  
    
    BoB
36.1402QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 03 1992 17:588
    BoB...  are you predicting a Jesters victory...
    
    What are you,
    
    Crazy !!!!!
    
    
    BG
36.1403CSC32::SALZERTue Nov 03 1992 18:308
    The outcome sunday will tell the tale for the Denver's season.  
    Denver should win this game at home but a loss shoots down the 
    whole year. 
    
    Dan Quayle was on TV today. He told everybody to 
    "be sure to go out and vot!"
    
    BoB
36.1404CSC32::SALZERThu Nov 05 1992 01:449
    I was talking with one of the Jets faithfull today.
    She said the Jets came to Denver about 4 or 5 years 
    ago and beat the Broncos. I was at a Jets Bronco game 
    about 10 years ago or more (where does the time go?).
    Todd was qb for NY and they pulled a tremendous come
    from behind win over Denver. They seem to like this
    stadium. 
    
    BoB
36.1405LJOHUB::CRITZThu Nov 05 1992 11:296
    	I was reading yesterday's USA Today. In the Sports section,
    	there was a picture of Elway and his family. He and his wife
    	have four kids. All the kids have as much ivory in their
    	mouths as dad does.
    
    	Scott
36.1406BSS::JCOTANCHThu Nov 05 1992 12:496
    Last time I remember the Jets and Denver playing was in '86 on a Monday 
    night in the Meadowlands.  The Jets won that one 22-10.  I can't recall the
    Jets playing in Denver in quite a while.
    
    
    Joe   
36.1407PFSVAX::JACOBThe Set Hidden Patrol is Riding aginThu Nov 05 1992 18:4814
    

    >>	I was reading yesterday's USA Today. In the Sports section,
    >>	there was a picture of Elway and his family. He and his wife
    >>	have four kids. All the kids have as much ivory in their
    >>	mouths as dad does.
    
    Just think, if those teef were really ivory, Elway'd have to hire a
    security force to protect him and the fambily, cause the poachers that
    are in Africa killing off the elephants fer their tusks would drop
    everything and take the firsted plane fer Denver, big guns in hand.
    
    JaKe
    
36.1408BSS::JCOTANCHThu Nov 05 1992 18:5610
    The last Denver and the Jets played before 1986 was 1980.  Last four
    meetings between Denver and NYJ:
    
    1986 (in NY) Jets won, 22-10
    1980 (in Denver) Denver won 31-24
    1978 (in Denver) Jets won 31-28
    1976 (in Denver) Denver won 46-3
    
    
    Joe
36.1409QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Nov 05 1992 19:405
    Looking good...  Denver's turn to win it !!!
    
    Where are ya JoJ_not...  Ain't heard from ya yet !!
    
    BG
36.1410CSC32::SALZERFri Nov 06 1992 18:103
    2 tix available for sunday's Jets game at $25 apiece
    
    BoB
36.1411PFSVAX::JACOBThe Set Hidden Patrol is Riding aginFri Nov 06 1992 19:065
    I'll take them, send me the two tickets AND the $50 for taking them!!!
    
    
    JaKe
    
36.1412BRONCOS POISED FOR TURN AROUND !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 09 1992 14:3643
    
    YES !!!
    
     Danny Boy let Mr. Ed call his own plays and the Bronco offense 
    actually showed a spark of life against a much improved NY. Jesters
    team.  John called a brillant game against the Jests...  Hopefully
    Dan and the Collies will wake up and use an offense designed to
    take full advantage of Elways top notch quarter backing skills.
    I see the no huddle as the next logical step for these Mighty
    Broncos on their road to yet another AFC championship and a shot
    at a Superbowl victory.   
    
     Sammy Smith was a huge mistake for the Donks...  they should 
    have sucked in their pride and made Bobby Humphries an off to 
    keep him in Denver.  If that could not be accomplished they 
    should have looked for at least an average O'lineman for back-
    up in injury situations.  Smith will again be side lined with a 
    groin injury.  Green showed signs of life towards the end of
    the game but the O'line needs to make a few slightly larger
    hole for him to return to his effectivness of last year.
    
     Next weeks game against the Midgets should be a tell tale game 
    for the Donks.  With LT out (damn Shame by any standard) the offensive
    line should be able to provide Mr. Ed with some protection.  One 
    small tid bit...  No sacks on Teeth in 2 weeks.  This team might 
    be poised to turn the corner.  The true test will come against 
    the surging Doughboys in a few weeks.  If the Donks can win this game 
    they will prove to the NFC (and more importantly themselves)that they 
    can compete in the much touted east.  
    
    
     Elway is truly one of the best team players in the NFL today.  He 
    has supported the teams decisions through think and thin.  For Danny
    to break down and make the drastic changes made this week clearly 
    shows that his job is not as secure as many might think.  Elway is
    this franchise...  Reeves may have figured that out this week.
    
    
    BG
    
    WARDLE...  THE JESTS SIP !!
    
    
36.1413BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 09 1992 14:4117
The Broncos won a must-win game yesterday over the Jets, 27-16.  Denver was on
the verge of putting it away late in the 3rd, but managed to add a little drama
until the Jets turned the ball over at midfield trailing by 4, and Denver
proceeded to take it into the end zone for the clincher.  

The offensive line, a major disaster area a month ago, is slowly turning into 
a solid unit - the running game was decent yesterday and they didn't allow any 
sacks for the 2nd game in a row.  Actually, the whole offense seems to be 
getting better while the defense is starting to slip.  The Jets moved the ball 
quite effectively yesterday, especially on the ground, where NY averaged a 
whopping 8 yards per carry.

Green had a good day, averaging over 5 yards a carry, and Arthur Marshall had a
terrific day with 5 catches for 134 yards and a TD.


Joe
36.1414JoJ_NOT watch, day 1ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Nov 09 1992 15:045
    
    BG did JoJ ever get in touch with you??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1415QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 09 1992 17:466
    
     NEVER...
    
     The guys a loser !!!  I was looking for a P-Name change ...
    
    BG
36.1416time to get even!!!CNTROL::CHILDSBig Imagination, better than real lifeWed Nov 11 1992 15:217
 Well BG, the Giants are coming to town this weekend to kick the crap out
 the Donks per usual. No amount of scrambling or preferential treatment
 will save Mr. Ed. Perhaps you'd care to risk a p-name on the outcome?
 Winner's choice naturally....

 ;^)
36.1417No points... Even up !!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 16:1111
    You're on...  
    
     What did ya have in mind o ye mindless one...  ;^)
    
    
     How about this.  You win,  my P-name becomes "Giants, Greatest Team
    Ever"
    
     I win, Your P-name becomes "John Elway,  My Hero and Mentor"
    
    BG
36.1418CNTROL::CHILDSBig Imagination, better than real lifeWed Nov 11 1992 16:143
Like I said the winner gets to chose the other's p-name....I haven't decided
on yours yet.....and the looser wears it for a week....
36.1419Your on... I got the Donks and we go even, no points !QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 16:185
    You're on !!!   that'll give me some time to think of a really
    great one that will shame you for life.  Nothing to outragous
    though...
    
    BG
36.1420hth ;*)CSTEAM::FARLEYHail to Bill Long and TcMWed Nov 11 1992 16:2410
    a voice from the sidelines....
    
    OK guys, just make syre that the loser's p-name passes the scrutiny
    of MtM.  I don't think you'd want anything hidden from all to see,
    right?
    
    I remain,
    a guardian angle!
    Kev
    
36.1421CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 11 1992 17:074
    Donks are due besides the Giants have never played at
    Denver at night. What ever that means.
    
    BoB
36.1422BSS::JCOTANCHWed Nov 11 1992 17:4311
    The Giants are one of 2 teams that the Broncos have never beaten under
    Reeves.
    
    The other is...
    
    
    
     ...Miami.
    
    
    Joe
36.1423I don't trust you, Mikey !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 17:5711
    
    The Donks will win this one...  And then Childs will be saddled
    with a P-Name that will shame him for life.
    
    BG
    
    ps.  Childs,  One stipulation to the P-Name bet.  The loser (you) has
         to enter a minimum of one note per day for the entire week.  
    	 Agreed ???
    
    
36.1424LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Nov 11 1992 17:594
    Hey Mike, does 'saw know what you are doing?  I mean Ray is still the
    coach...
    
    Brews
36.1425I don't trust ya, Mikey!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 18:189
    
     I couldn't be happier...  The KOD has been applied.  The Midgets
    lose,  thanks Mikey !!
    
    BG
    
    BTW:  I don't consider this P-name wager finalized yet.  I want an
    	  absolute answer.  Yes or No...  Are we on with the stated
    	  expectations.  Do you need me to read them to ya??  
36.1426CNTROL::CHILDSBig Imagination, better than real lifeWed Nov 11 1992 18:359
 Look Jack, you should know by now that I don't run away and not note for
 a while like some might. Because you know that you will be the looser, if
 you feel the need to have the one note per day stipulation put in that's
 fine with me.....

 here's you p-name for next week.   John Elway, Spoiled Brat, Girly-mon

 mike
36.1427CNTROL::CHILDSBig Imagination, better than real lifeWed Nov 11 1992 18:364
 Brews, even Ray can't loose this one.....

 mike
36.1428SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Wed Nov 11 1992 18:373
       Giants/Donks...onea those games where it's too bad one team has to
    win!
                                  Denny
36.1429FDCV07::KINGWed Nov 11 1992 18:453
    Denny, they could tie.....
    
    REK
36.1430CNTROL::CHILDSBig Imagination, better than real lifeWed Nov 11 1992 18:553
that's true they could tie. If they do I say were both loosers BG and have
to wear the p-names of the others choice....
36.1431CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHMelanie's formula - $70/caseWed Nov 11 1992 19:257
36.1432Picky Picky !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 19:4514
    
    Mikey...
    
     Agreed...  I case of a tie we both wear the P-Name.  I haven't thought
    of your P-Name yet...  I'll get back to ya.
    
    =Bob=,
    
     A simple typo...  Don't waste your education on me, I have my own
    to waste.  I think I made my point regardless !
    
    HTH,
    
    BG
36.1433QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesWed Nov 11 1992 20:1618
      Finally,  time to note!
    
      The Broncos OL has looked good,  but they haven't had alot of
    blitzing to deal with,  unlike during the 'skins & iggles games. 
    Expect more pressure on Biff.
    
    
      The defensive line sucks!  They don't have a pass rush that will be
    effective.  Sports casters praise Kragen,  but I don't think he is that
    good,  no matter what his work ethic is like.
    
      Reeves might want to let Biff call the plays this weekend since Elway
    has more of a clue on being less predictable.
    
      If Broncos stop the jints from running wild,  then I beleive they
    will win.
    
       Tim
36.1434PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 11 1992 20:203
    Is Jill_the_excited still around?  Quite a few of the other Bronco
    noters have come out of the woodwork now that football season is in
    full swing.
36.1435QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 20:293
    Don't know...  there was some TFSO action up there.  Ask the Devil Dog
    
    BG
36.1436CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 11 1992 21:074
    I see Jill on occasion. Let's see if we can get an
    encore appearance.
    
    BoB
36.1437TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelThu Nov 12 1992 14:116
    
    Jill, like many donk noters of old, hasn't been seen in here since Jan.
    26 of 1986.  Like JD after UA almost beat Miami, they've been away on
    business quite a bit lately.
    
    Brews
36.1438ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Nov 12 1992 14:125
    
    rooollling Brews. Thanks I needed that.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1439CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Thu Nov 12 1992 14:207
Brews -

UA almost beat Miami.  Sort of like Bush almost beat Clinton, the Argentinians
almost beat the Brits.  Almost is almost.   They lost.   Now, the Dawgs did lose
to UA.  Not almost.    ND did lose to Stanford.  ND almost lost to BC....

JD
36.1440It Never Fails, Open Your Trap and it Happens !QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Nov 12 1992 14:2818
    Well...
    
     I hate to be the one to have to put this in here but it only seems
    right that I do.  I was reading the Denver Post this morning at 
    breakfast,  the sports section had an interesting article about the
    ELWAY VS. REEVES play calling pi$$ing contest.  Elway said "If I had 
    my choice I'd really rather be calling the plays".  Reeves retorts
    with, "It's easy to tell whos calling the plays,  if it works it was
    John,  If it doesn't, it was Me".  
    
     Damn It John !!!   I was just defending you against this kind of crap.
    Put a friggin lid on it and play ball !!
    
    I Remain,
    
    Disillusioned in Colorado Springs,
    
    BG  (Thanks Kev)
36.1441Not gone and glad to see not forgotten!CSC32::KINSELLAit's just a wheen o' blethersThu Nov 12 1992 15:3624
What a minute!  I've made an appearance every year and not just 1986.  Cheap
shot from the cheap shot artist.  TFSO has not taken me yet, but it's looming
on the horizon again.  We're rather busy right now because they are dispersing 
my team into other teams, having us try to figure out what a roles are, and
giving us new job codes...which we don't know what they are yet.  It's a 
trying time.

I am still among the Bronco faithful, but I've got a beau who isn't much
on football, so I haven't seen much this season.  Maybe 3-4 games.  I'm
trying to bring him around, but with church and activities on Sunday,
we don't always get to watch the games.  It's not that he doesn't like
the game, he just doesn't have a favorite team since he's from Phoenix
so it's not high on his priority list.

I'm glad to hear the O-line is coming together a little more.  I've been
screaming at them in half the games I've watched.  Thank goodness I can
yell loud enough for them to hear.  I'll try to make sure to catch the
Giants game and make another appearance.

Okie dokie?

Jill
    
36.1442re: .1441, skip church?? :-)ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Nov 12 1992 16:024
    
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1443Church - #1 PriorityCSC32::KINSELLAit's just a wheen o' blethersThu Nov 12 1992 17:467
    
    Somebody has to pray for you heathens.  ;')   Not to mention the
    Broncos.  I call upon Divine Intervention alot.  That's why we 
    have all those last minute comebacks that seem impossible.
    
    Jill
    
36.1444AXIS::ROBICHAUDJohn 3:16 - Patriots 0:16Thu Nov 12 1992 18:264
    	Be careful with these P-Name bets, a couple of upper/lower case
    mistakes and you get branded a crook for life!
    
    				/Don
36.1445CNTROL::CHILDSBig Imagination, better than real lifeThu Nov 12 1992 19:355
I thought in Denver, Pile-it-High Stadium was a church??? It makes sense when
you consider the respect the refs give the hometown team. The way the folks
were orange and worship the grown BBJ walks on....

;^)
36.1446ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Nov 12 1992 19:588
    
    Didn't lots of churches start services early a few years back so they
    would be finished before a Bronco playoff game? I think it was the AFC
    Championship game in Cleveland that had a 12:30 Eeaster, 10:30 Mountain
    start that "necessitated" the change of time for church services.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1447C'mon give'm a rest (NOT!) ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYHail to Bill Long and TcMThu Nov 12 1992 20:1112
    
    just a word of advice (Hey, I'm a nice guy)
    
    Be careful with all these notes about churches, ya might make MtM
    start to count again!
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    willing to lend him my calculator (w/instructions)!
    Kev
    
36.1448LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelThu Nov 12 1992 20:125
    
    Careful about the church talk in here before a Jints game, Jill, or
    we'll bring back Reverend Jim.
    
    
36.1449Besides, Come to the stadium and see GAWD, aka Elway !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Nov 12 1992 20:158
    
    TRUE...  Churches in Denver and C. Springs have early services when
    their regular times overlap important Bronco Games...  You gotta love
    it.  Even the men and women of the cloth have there priorities !!
    
    ;^)
    
    BG
36.1450QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Nov 12 1992 20:253
    There should be Their...
    
    BG
36.1451LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelThu Nov 12 1992 20:484
    It's a good thing you corrected that, I thought I was gonna have to
    insult you're intelligence again.
    
    Brews
36.1452CSC32::SALZERThu Nov 12 1992 23:089
    I was at a game several years back and at half time they 
    let some kids come out to mid-field and show banners that
    they made to the crowd. Two little kids unfurled theirs
    
    THE DENVER BRONCOS LOVE LAWRENCE TAYLOR
    
    It had everybody in stitches. 
    
    BoB
36.1453CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Fri Nov 13 1992 11:598
Very nice to see a note by Jill.  Hope all is well.

Very good discussion in here.  Highly informative.  Nothing repeated, no recurring
themes.  Just good honest football talk.

Love it.

JD
36.1454QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 13 1992 14:1921
    Glad we could make your day for ya JD...
    
     So,  an article in the paper the other day talked about how the 
    dumb sh*t Tommy Maddox almost got ran down by the Broncos mascot
    (A Giant White Horse) while returning to the sidelines after another
    turn at playing $1,000,000 a year holder on exta points and field goals.
    This guy is a waste product.  They did however have a stupid line in 
    the sports section regarding this "incident".  Went some thing like
    "If Tommy (the dumb sh*t) could take a hit from that horse and get up,
    he can take a hit from anyone".  The Denver papers are out of control,
    they'll write about anything.  I bet it won't be long before we find
    out what kind of candy John handed out this year.  I guess the point of
    this note is that the Bronco "Brain Truss" (HA !) will spend a
    $1,000,000 a year on an unproven girly mon like Maddox but won't cough
    up the $$$ to pick up someone that would really help the team, like
    Keith Jackson maybe...  
    
    BG
    
    PS.  Donks crush the Midgets by more than 10 pts
    
36.1455CAMONE::WAYGot my mojo workin'Fri Nov 13 1992 14:2717
>    out what kind of candy John handed out this year.  I guess the point of


	Oh it's scrumscious, when it crunches,
	that's why John like's Nestle's Crunch

	[cut to scene of John throwing a candy bar to Mrs. Ed]


	Oh it's scrumscious, when it crunches,
	that's why John like's Nestle's Crunch




hth,
'Saw
36.1456John Is Gawd... Midget Lose, So Does Childs !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 13 1992 16:0416
    
    
    Good one `Saw....  I hated that damn thing.
    
    Actually,
    
     I can't believe I just read this but John was quoted in the
    paper as saying "I really fooled them all this year...  I handed 
    out everything.  "Snickers, Nestle's Crunch, Reeses, Suckers,
    Gum, you name it."
    
    Sick Man...  I wish they'd write about something important like when 
    Reeves is gonna be fired...
    
    
    BG
36.1457PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Nov 13 1992 16:101
    I think BG is finally seeing the light, eh Mike C.?
36.1458I saw the light... I was a friggen train !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 13 1992 16:278
    Just pissing in the wind Mac...  Playing both sides of the fence incase
    the donks pull their usual gag while playing the NFC...  ;^)  Beside,
    by saying how much I like the Giants, what a great team they are and
    that they can't possible lose in pile-it-high I'm sure to put a major
    KOD on them boys.
    
    
    BG
36.1459sorryCNTROL::CHILDSBig Imagination, better than real lifeMon Nov 16 1992 11:427
Congrats BG and the Donks. As bias as the refs were though, it didn't matter.
The Giants with the exception of Pepper Johnson played like a dead dog. I
figured with the rest of the division loosing they'd be inspired but nope.
I shoulda went to bed...

;^
36.1460CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my hero &amp; mentorMon Nov 16 1992 11:457
 I knew the game was over when they knocked BBJ out. Giants always loose to
 second string QB's. The break Thiesman's leg, "Jay Shreder" beats them, they
 knock Jaworski out of a game Cunningham beats them, and the list goes on and 
 on....

 mike
36.1461CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Nov 16 1992 12:0420
Mikey, 

I wanted to tell you last week, as I've told Brews "never bet the Giants".


I watched the game with a coldly detached fascination, much as one might
watch a cat toying with a mouse, before licking it all over and then
biting its head off.

The Giants SUCKED.  They proved last night that when they play a REAL team,
they just don't have it.   My long dead grandmother could have run through
some of the tackling in the secondary, and it wouldn't matter who the
QB was, that read and react crap from Rust is just plain ineffective.
(btw, did anyone see Rod Rust do the Joe Walton?  It was classic).

I've been trying all morning to find the words to describe Ray Handjob
bundled into his snowsuit.  It was classically funny.


'Saw
36.1462YESSS!!BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 16 1992 14:2219
Finally, an impressive win, against an NFC team, on national TV.  This was
definitely the most complete game Denver has played this season.  Even after
NY cut the lead to 7 midway thru the 4th and had grabbed the all-important 
momentum, Denver responded with a TD drive to regain control of the game and
pretty much put it away.

The offense, the line in particular, is now past the stage of looking like an
NFL offense and is now turning into a good offense.  This was the 3rd game in
a row that Denver hasn't allowed any sacks, and in the last 4 games they've
scored 27 points 3 times and 21 the other time.  For comparison, Denver 
averaged 12 points per game thru the first 6 games of the season.  The fact
that Maddox came in and did a great job is as much a tribute to the offensive
line as it is to Maddox himself.

Elway's initial X-ray was negative and right now it sounds like he will be
playing next week.


Joe
36.1463FAids week starting!QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Nov 16 1992 14:2417
      Mike is starting to sound more like Hal:-)
    
      I think the broncos played a good game.  No sacks,  as they sacked
    hoss 5x!!  Green actually had a great game,  but credit needs to go to
    the OL.  3 weeks with no sacks!
    
      Kragen woke up.
    
    
      Any details on Biff?
    
      Is Shawn Moore still around?  I have not seen any news of him being
    cut,  but a friend of mine insists that he was cut.
    
      Maddox did well though.
    
    	Tim
36.1464Doinks are awesome....(ouch, that hurts!)ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Nov 16 1992 14:307
    Looks like the doinks finally got a QB worth talking about.  I was
    impressed with Maddox. Maybe Reeves knows what he's doing after all? 
    Nahhhh! The doinks are looking real tough and the faids are gonna have
    a real hard time stopping them....(just trying out BG's KoD theory..:-)
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
36.1465CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Nov 16 1992 14:3529
>Finally, an impressive win, against an NFC team, on national TV.  This was
>definitely the most complete game Denver has played this season.  Even after
>NY cut the lead to 7 midway thru the 4th and had grabbed the all-important 
>momentum, Denver responded with a TD drive to regain control of the game and
>pretty much put it away.


Ahem.  The Giants didn't grab any momentum.  They recovered a fumble,
the Donks got a little nervous, the Giants had a flash in the pan TD,
and then the Donks came back with a vicious left hook to the temple.

Believe me, as a Giants fan I felt no more excited about them pulling
within 7 as I would if they had pulled within 34.   They weren't going
to do it.

>The offense, the line in particular, is now past the stage of looking like an
>NFL offense and is now turning into a good offense.  This was the 3rd game in
>a row that Denver hasn't allowed any sacks, and in the last 4 games they've
>scored 27 points 3 times and 21 the other time.  For comparison, Denver 
>averaged 12 points per game thru the first 6 games of the season.  The fact
>that Maddox came in and did a great job is as much a tribute to the offensive
>line as it is to Maddox himself.

Maddox is talented, and I compliment Reeves for some excellent play calling.



'Saw

36.1466CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my hero &amp; mentorMon Nov 16 1992 14:547
 Hey let's not get out of hand here praising the Donks' offensive line. 
 Although Kay did get called for tackling it was clearly a call that
 the refs could have called all night. It seemed to me everytime a Giants'
 pass rusher got close to the Qb he end up face first on the ground. 

 mike
36.1467BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 16 1992 14:5522
> Ahem.  The Giants didn't grab any momentum.  They recovered a fumble,
> the Donks got a little nervous, the Giants had a flash in the pan TD,
> and then the Donks came back with a vicious left hook to the temple.

> Believe me, as a Giants fan I felt no more excited about them pulling
> within 7 as I would if they had pulled within 34.   They weren't going
> to do it.

I didn't say "Denver gave away 7 points" more or less to protect myself.  It
got me extremely pissed off at that point for Denver to cough up the ball
when they had played a very solid game and were in firm control at that time.
After that fumble and ensuing TD, nothing but bad thoughts were in my head. 
I've seen Denver play a good game and dominate the opposition before only to
totally fall apart in a short span and lose (the 1990 game in Buffalo is
what I'm thinking of).  Plus, it was exactly the kind of break NY needed to 
give them some life.  They're 2 TD's down, Denver is driving in good field 
position eating up the clock, and suddenly you're only down by 7 with plenty 
of time left.


Joe
36.1468CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Nov 16 1992 15:1522
>I didn't say "Denver gave away 7 points" more or less to protect myself.  It
>got me extremely pissed off at that point for Denver to cough up the ball
>when they had played a very solid game and were in firm control at that time.
>After that fumble and ensuing TD, nothing but bad thoughts were in my head. 
>I've seen Denver play a good game and dominate the opposition before only to
>totally fall apart in a short span and lose (the 1990 game in Buffalo is
>what I'm thinking of).  Plus, it was exactly the kind of break NY needed to 
>give them some life.  They're 2 TD's down, Denver is driving in good field 
>position eating up the clock, and suddenly you're only down by 7 with plenty 
>of time left.

Okay, Joe, I see now.

You were coming from a Denver fan's point of view, where you've seen them
blow it.

I was coming from a Giants_Under_Ray_Handjob point of view, were I knew
that the Giants didn't have an icicles chance in Hell of pulling it out
after that TD....8^)


'Saw
36.1469Of course!!!CSC32::KINSELLAit's just a wheen o' blethersMon Nov 16 1992 16:128
    
    I didn't even watch...I knew the game was in the bag.  The Broncos
    always win for my birthday, which is tomorrow.  It's my yearly
    present from them.  I actually pray for an AFC West team to have
    this weekend every year, but it doesn't always work out that way.
    But hey, a win is a win.
    
    Jill, offensive & defensive prayer coordinator ;^)
36.1470Lack of oxygen MikeOURGNG::RIGGENHey Bill is chicken pluckin a good career move?Mon Nov 16 1992 17:4314
Hey let's not get out of hand here praising the Donks' offensive line. 
 Although Kay did get called for tackling it was clearly a call that
 the refs could have called all night. It seemed to me everytime a Giants'
 pass rusher got close to the Qb he end up face first on the ground. 

 mike
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Not the Denver death gripe again, how about the Giants TE that lets Croel by 
without even a look till after Jeff "9th tr Rookie" Hostetler is sitting
on his butt. I didn't believe you Saw' but Ray "big fat boob" made Dan look 
like a real NFL coach. 

Jeff
36.1471CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Nov 16 1992 17:5520
>Not the Denver death gripe again, how about the Giants TE that lets Croel by 
>without even a look till after Jeff "9th tr Rookie" Hostetler is sitting
>on his butt. I didn't believe you Saw' but Ray "big fat boob" made Dan look 
>like a real NFL coach. 

Told ya Jeff.

Ray Handjob is about as much of an NFL coach as I am a millionaire.
He couldn't coach Pop Warner league, let alone the NFL.


The two most enjoyable moments of the game for me were when Ray Doughboy
was whining to the refs, and then yelled "Goddam it", and later when
they showed a shot of Rod Rust doing his best Joe Walton "I've almost
got it, let me shove my finger farther up there" impression......


classic,

'Saw
36.1472What a coach!SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Mon Nov 16 1992 18:063
       And how about that Raymond Berry guy. He seems to be doing a good
    job with that kid Maddox!
                                   Denny
36.1473have been lousy since he leftFRETZ::HEISERI jam, therefore I amMon Nov 16 1992 20:252
    I wish Berry was still in New England.  At least they were competitive
    then.
36.1474LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Nov 16 1992 21:3711
    
    I don't want to jd you guys and let the excuse of being away on a
    business trip to not get in, so here goes:
    
    Congrats to the Broncos and their fans (especially Jill) on their fine
    win over my men in blue.  Once again they have proven that they know
    how to win, when the game doesn't matter.
    
    I'll be back in a few days to finsish up.
    
    Brews
36.1475DECWET::METZGERThis space being flea bombed..Mon Nov 16 1992 22:227
Maddox will lead the Broncos to a super bowl victory before his career in Denver
is over...John-boy will never lead them to the promised land...

You heard it here first...

Metz
36.1476CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Tue Nov 17 1992 11:4411
Mr. Boss.

Even while away, I did come in here.  I obviously missed mr. Jolmama's note
- and no one  seemed to press the issue for months.   I didn't read every
unseen note.   

Still waiting to hear what sports you play.   

(Going on a week now...)

JD
36.1477John Elway, *MY* Hero and Mentor !!! QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 15:1729
    
    Great Bronco Victory...
    
     The Broncos finally played a complete game.  Elway look sharp in the
    first half and really distributed the ball well during the time he was 
    in the game.  The Bronco's line is actually comming around.  John may
    just live through the season.  I wonder if He's promised them a new car
    if they can get him out alive (Elway owns 3 or 4 dealerships in
    Denver).  The defense did a good job against the happless Midgets. 
    Bronco fans shouldn't get to excited about this win.  The Midgets are
    a mear shaddow of their old selves and are not a competive NFC team.  They
    showed how inept (sp?) they are Sunday night on national TV.  Hoss is
    a loser...  I'd rather have Simms in there than Hoss.  Tommy Maddox
    show signs of actually being able to play in the NFL.  He's got pretty
    good touch and seems to have learned to keep his cool.  Saying that
    Maddox will lead the Broncos to a super bowl at this point is crap.
    Metz is just pissed and trying to crank up the bronco faithful.  This
    team is comming around.  After the clinic in how not to play defense
    given during last nights Monday Night game,  the Broncos could be a
    Contender for the AFC title.  We'll see.  
    
    
     Childs,  The Donks Win, The Donks Win, The Donks Win...  It don't
    matter how many qualifiers you want to put on it...  The Zebras,
    The Denver Death Grip,  The Pike-It-High curse, Etc...  The Broncos
    kicked the crap outta the Happless Midgets and you're wearing the
    greatest p-name of all time !!    HAAAAAAAA  !!!  I love it !!!
    
    BG
36.1478Hudson Elite Society Of ReadOnlyNoters JS-pres.CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my Hero &amp; MentorTue Nov 17 1992 16:587
Geez BG, what da hail did ya do petition the HESORON to get after me?
People been walking up to me in the halls here and saying John Elway
my Hero and Mentor and chuckling....such abuse in my own building.
how much you payin' em'....

mike  still smiling
36.1479CSC32::SALZERTue Nov 17 1992 17:0314
    They finally shook a rather large monkey off their back.
    If they can just get rid of that gorilla hanging around
    their neck now. 
    
    Sorry Reeves bashers but there's no way Bolan can dump
    him now. 
             - Mr Ed starts and calls own plays. A good move.
             - Mr Ed goes down switch to unproven green qb.
               Reeves shows faith and Maddox returns favor.
             - Rivers fumbles at mid field setting up Giants
               only td.  Reeves calls Rivers' number the 
               clinching score. 
             
    BoB
36.1480Raiders Best in NFL... can't lose to Denver !! KOD !!!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 18:0915
    
     Childs...  I got connections everywhere !!  ;^)
    
     BoB...  You're right on there.  i don't know that once the Broncos
    clinched a winning season that Bowlen could get rid of him and survive
    the rath of the Denver faithful.  
    
     I have to say that the little bout with the press on his total lack of 
    creativity in play calling might have done him some good.  That was not
    the typical Reeves game plan he called after John went down.  Maybe
    Elway was whispering in his ear on the sidelines.  I could live with a
    Dan Reeves that call a game like that.  Good mix,  lots' of passing in 
    non passing situations...  Got to love it !
    
    
36.1481clairificationQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 18:114
    When I say clinch, I'm assuming a win against the Sea Chickens both at 
    home and away !!
    
    BG
36.1482BSS::JCOTANCHTue Nov 17 1992 18:328
>             - Rivers fumbles at mid field setting up Giants
>               only td.  Reeves calls Rivers' number the 
>               clinching score. 
             
That was Lewis you're thinking of, not Rivers.


Joe
36.1483Go Donks !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 19:469
    Right you are, Joe...
    
     This Bronco team could make the Superbowl again this year.  To
    bad they won't make it past the awesome Raiders, the are the best team
    in football.  The only reason the Raiders are where they are is because
    for the Zebras.  Bad calls have kept them and their god like coach and
    GM out of the superbowl.
    
    KOD by BG
36.1484God help us, puhleeeze!CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Tue Nov 17 1992 19:581
    
36.1485So Sorry....CSC32::KINSELLAit's just a wheen o' blethersWed Nov 18 1992 18:038
    
    Childs,
    
    I send my condolences.  It must have been really hard for you to watch
    your hero and mentor get hurt.  I know you must be thrilled that it's
    not serious.  
    
    Jill
36.1486CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my Hero &amp; MentorThu Nov 19 1992 13:003
thank you for your sympathy Jill. it has been tough week. thank the lord it's
almost over..... 
36.1487QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Nov 19 1992 19:516
    Maybe you'll think twice about betting against the MIGHTY DONKS in 
    the future, Mikey.  I've extracted your p-name form the file and 
    sent it to BBJ along with the phone number you can be reached during 
    the day.
    
    Jack
36.1488CSC32::SALZERFri Nov 20 1992 00:4326
    Anymore bets like that and we'll have Childs seriously
    thinking about jumping onboard the the Bronco wagon.
    Good to see your coming around and begining to become
    a decent judge of horse flesh. Pardon the pun.  
    
    As far as I can recall, this is the first game Elway has
    ever missed due to injury.  There was the game that they
    forgot to bring his knee brace then there were a few 
    missed due to illness.  
    
    There was a whole bunch of hitting going on out there 
    sunday night.  Bodies were laying everywhere and the shot
    of NY's lb on the sideline with the mud and blood was 
    classic.  Smith was dishing out some hits but he got 
    nailed at least one good time too. I hadn't seen the 
    Broncos in that style of game in a long time. 
    
    Several of the Hostettler's sacks were attributed to the
    pass coverage.  He had the pocket and the time but no receiver.
    That's been a long time coming too.  Three games now without
    a sack allowed!  The running game seems to be coming on.
    Sunday at Raiders is the big one.  Everybody gets ready and 
    nobody looks past it.  Overall it's more critical for the
    Raiders but the Broncos have a great deal riding there also.
    
    BoB
36.1489QUASER::JACKSONTABG + Carlos=KOD nauseaFri Nov 20 1992 11:099
      If the donks play like they did against the jints,  the game is in
    the bag.  If not,  then???
    
      Of course this will probably be the typical less than 7 point victory
    for whomever wins.
    
      Go Broncos!!!
    
    	Tim
36.1490CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my Hero &amp; MentorFri Nov 20 1992 12:3111
First of all Jack, you know I'm not going to give up. Like I said  earlier
I'll see you in Three Rivers or Pile it High again in the offs'. 

BoB, that piece of horse flesh you're talking about more like an intestine
no guts you know what I mean? The little boy got hit a few times so he went
to the sideline. Once he threw that inty he paniced and got his butt replaced.
Biggest mistake we made was knock him out of the game. He'd have given it
back....

mike
36.1491Ouch !!! I'm gonna put the hurt on ya during the `offsQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 12:5921
     Carloskiwitz...
    
     You know that the Donks ca't win this game.  They are totaly out
    classed by your up and coming Raiders.  the Raiders will be the
    nexted(tm) NFL dynasty, starting this year.  The raiders are the 
    only team in the AFC that can and will bring the Superbowl back 
    to the conference.  Yes,  there is know wat the Raiders can lose
    this one at home in front of their Quiche Eat Yuppy Fans.... BTW,
    Do you eat Quiche, Carloskiwitz ??? Inquiring Minds and all that
    Bull S___.
    
    Childs...
    
     Can't wait to see ya with another p-name for the playoffs.  Maybe
    something like,  "John Elway, The Greatest QB to ever Play",  or
    "John Elway, The Giant Killer" or perhaps "John Elway, I Love Him"
    or maybe even "I wish I had John Elways Teeth"  or even worse, "John
    Elway's Wife Is A Babe".  If you're man enough to wear something like
    that for a week or two,  I'm sure we can work something out.
    
    BG
36.1492QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 13:003
    Damn...  I got fat fingers today !!!
    
    BG
36.1493FRIDAY::WADEHis hair was perfect...Fri Nov 20 1992 13:125
    
    	It appears Sammie Smith has opted for surgery to repair his
    	*groin problems*.  This will end his season.........
    
    Claybroon
36.1494QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 13:365
    What's the problem, Claybroon...  Does he have some torn tissue
    or what.  Those kinds of things usually heal all by their lonesome.
    
    BG (Going to get the sports section)
    
36.1495CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my Hero &amp; MentorFri Nov 20 1992 15:384
 I'll be working on your p-name until then.... ;^)

 Smellway three time LOOSER!!!!
36.1496MCIS2::DHAMELThing of beauty and a boy foreverFri Nov 20 1992 16:273
    
    There goes that damn Loose/Lose alarm again!
    
36.1497QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 16:314
    Surgery not a sure this for Sammy yet...  Trade or waivers are in
    his future though...  Just a feeling.
    
    BG
36.1498ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 20 1992 17:102
    
    Have the donks ever won an NFL championship?
36.1499Clowns Fans Are Really Obnoxious !! Groaner, where Ya BeenQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 17:2612
    
    Here we go !!!
    
     Have The Clowns ever won (in the modern era fo football) a game that 
    ment anything.  Have the Clowns ever beat Denver to get the right to
    go to a Superbowl,  Have the Clowns ever been to a Superbowl (besides
    sitting in the stands).  Do the Clowns have a manly QB who doesn't wear
    dresses...  I think Not !!!
    
    Thats all for me,
    
    BG
36.1500browns have won and NFL championship... donks.. NOT!ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 20 1992 17:324
    
    
    I've been read only for the past couple of months... too much work to do.
    
36.1501ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 20 1992 17:333
    
    
    ... p.s. If everyone sends me $, I will go back to read-only.
36.1502QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 17:3510
    it might be worth it...  ;^)
    
    How ya been anyway !!
    
    BG
    
    speaking of $ I still got that one I won from ya...  Hanging in my
    office..
    
    
36.1503CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Nov 20 1992 17:4612
Wow, guys, I hate to be a spoil sport, but in the past few notes,
we done busted up a couple of rules:

	First off, you can't be talking about Bernie Kozar and 
	dresses any more.   

	Second off, you can't be soliciting $$$ in here.
	(I know, I tried 8^))


You may now continue your regularly schedule Broncos-Browns debate,
'Saw
36.1504FRETZ::HEISERI jam, therefore I amFri Nov 20 1992 18:031
    Does Mr. Ed play QB for the Browns?
36.1505QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesFri Nov 20 1992 19:293
     Ohhhhh  pretty damn original, Heiser...  
    
    BG
36.1506just curious?QUASER::JACKSONTABG + Carlos=KOD nauseaSat Nov 21 1992 14:434
      You've been a RON fur 2 months because your too busy?  If thats the
    case,  then you should'nt be RON', right?
    
      Tim
36.1507PFSVAX::JACOBNewcastle Brown 'll sure smack ya downSun Nov 22 1992 20:269
    Judging by the firsted half, this rookie is just as adept at fouling up
    the Donks offense as Mr. Ed is.  
    
    He threw the interception that set up the TD with just the right
    authority, and Mr. Ed could only have been happy this guy is following
    in his footsteps.
    
    JaKe
    
36.1508uglyQUASER::JACKSONTABG + Carlos=KOD nauseaMon Nov 23 1992 13:0013
       The donks defense just can't get motivated on the road.  The offense
    moved the ball long enough to turn it over.
    
       Jay had all day to throw.  That was obvious since he didn't have a
    pick.
    
      Shawn Moore maybe would have done better.  Then again,  I don't think
    it would have mattered.
    
      Enjoy Carlos & co....At least this donk fan doesn't have to order the
    bird!
    
       Tim
36.1509There's the "Road" Broncos and the "Home" Broncos...BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 23 1992 13:1635
Okay Carlos, you win this one. :^(

Killer loss.  This one is all the worse when you consider that KC, SD,
Pittsburgh, and Luckalo all won.  Heading into this 2-game road trip, I figured
Denver would lose all of their road games except at Seattle and win their 2
home games to finish at 10-6.  I still think that's how they'll finish out -
whether or not that would be enough to win the division, I don't know, but 
probably not.

I thought Maddox played pretty well, considering it was his first NFL start and
on the road against a very tough defense.  Sure, he made a couple key mistakes,
but also showed quite a bit of composure and threw the ball pretty well.  The
thing that bothered me most about him is how he just plain dropped the ball 3
times.  Maybe it was jitters, but remember when he was drafted how they said he
has small hands and has trouble holding onto the ball?  I'm surprised the
Faiders didn't blitz him alot more.  His big mistakes were throwing the 
1st-quarter pick that led to LA's first TD and the fumble in the 3rd quarter 
when they were driving.  The rest of the offense made their share of mistakes -
2 holding penalties that helped stall drives, Vance dropping a pass that he 
should've caught for a TD, a blocked FG, and a measly 1 for 11 on 3rd downs.  
Denver dominated the 3rd quarter but just couldn't get the ball in the end
zone.

Defensively, Denver played terrible in the first half.  Dickerson ran for
nearly 100 yards before halftime.  

For what it's worth [nothing IMO] the game was much closer than the score
indicated.  There's no comparison to this loss and, say, the 30-0 shellacking
at Philly, but a loss is a loss.  The big differences in this one were that LA
took advantage of their scoring opportunities while Denver did not, and the
turnovers.  3rd down conversions were also a big factor - LA converted 50% whil
Denver was 1 for 11.


Joe
36.1510AFC West is up for grabs....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinMon Nov 23 1992 13:2819
       ___________                          __________
                 /    /       /            /         /
                /    /       /            /         /        /
     __________/    /_______/_   _____   /         /        /
    /                      /            /         /        /
   /                      /            /         /        /
  /___________           /            /_________/        *
    
    
    	
    Hey Big Game, that KoD stuff really works! Heh heh heh....:-)
    By the way, I take it all back...the doinks sip! Maybe if that super
    genious (Reeves) woulda got Bucky an OL with that #1 pick instead of
    TM-jr. he wouldn't be hurt right now....not that it would've mattered
    yesterday anyhow.
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
    
36.1511KOD failed me this week. QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 23 1992 15:1011
    
     Bad loss for the Donks...  Didn't get to see it since I was remodeling
    the kitchen all day but did hear some on the radio...  I must have been
    ugly.  With this loss, Denvers destiny in in the hands of outhers as
    far as the playoffs coming through denver.  Oh well...  Good win 
    Carloskiwitz...  The haids looked tough against the happless Donks.
    One good thing,  I didn't lose any money.
    
    BG
    
    
36.151224-0OURGNG::RIGGENHey Bill is chicken pluckin a good career move?Mon Nov 23 1992 20:1110
This game just plain sipped...

		The entire defense laid back and got beat on a Franco-Harris run 
for the sideline play all day. 

Stoopid lose. 

Seems like the loss fits with the Jeckel and Hyde season though. 

Jeff 
36.1513QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 23 1992 21:1911
    The Broncos may have turned the wrong way at the turning point of
    their season.  With a win in L.A. they would have been the master
    of their own destiny.  The loss puts them at the mercy of others.
    The K.C. and Luckalo games are now must wins for the Donks.  Also,
    the Dallas and Seachicken games will be very important to this team
    if they plan on collecting post season monies for christmas.  Like
    I said,  I didn't watch the game, only listened to it but the more
    I think about this loss the more I know it could very well be the 
    difference between sitting at home in the post season or playing.
    
    BG
36.1514BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 23 1992 22:0725
>    The K.C. and Luckalo games are now must wins for the Donks.  Also,
>    the Dallas and Seachicken games will be very important to this team
>    if they plan on collecting post season monies for christmas.  Like
>    I said,  I didn't watch the game, only listened to it but the more
>    I think about this loss the more I know it could very well be the 
>    difference between sitting at home in the post season or playing.
    
Well, KC and Luckalo are must games depending on what you're talking about. 
For Denver to get a bye in the first round or even home field throughout,
they're definitely must game.  (Actually, Denver would probably have to win out
to get home field all the way).  The division will most likely come down to the
final game at KC, and Denver will most likely lose that one.  It would have been
nice for Denver to have the divison wrapped up going into KC but that's
unlikely now since Denver would have to be 2 games up on KC before that one
since Denver's division record will most likely be worse than KC's.  But the
division title won't mean a whole hell of alot (compared to one of the wildcard
spots) unless you can get one of the byes.  

I'll agree about the Dallas and (at) Seattle games being important for this 
team to make the playoffs.  Assuming they lose at Luckalo and KC, they'll need
the other 3 for 10-6 which will almost certainly get them in, whereas 9-7 would
be a question mark.


Joe
36.1515Ah'm in disguise!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Nov 24 1992 12:0027
    >>>
              <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 36.1512                      Bronco notes                      1512 of 1514
OURGNG::RIGGEN "Hey Bill is chicken pluckin a good " 10 lines  23-NOV-1992 17:11
                                   -< 24-0 >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This game just plain sipped...

		The entire defense laid back and got beat on a Franco-Harris run 
for the sideline play all day. 

Stoopid lose. 
         ^
****     |
         -     ALERT!!!!!
    
    Somebody get the  loose/lose police!!!!
    
    
    I remain,
    Kev_for_Dickstah!
        
    
    ;^)
    
36.1516My, my, my,...hmmm, hmmm, hmmm,....well, well, well....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Nov 24 1992 12:4414
    Geez, it seems like just a week or so ago youze guys were talking about
    how great the defense was playing, the offensive line was much
    improved, the running game was coming around, Bucky was Gawd, and the
    doinks were just about a lock for representing the AFC in the 'Big
    Dance' as Art would put it. And now you guys are talking possible
    wild-card spots for the donks, or even worse, the donks possibly
    sitting at home for the playoffs......
    
    	No wonder you guys hate the faiders......:-)
    
    HtH
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
36.1517You should worry about what LA's doing for the postseason...BSS::JCOTANCHTue Nov 24 1992 13:3130
>    Geez, it seems like just a week or so ago youze guys were talking about
>    how great the defense was playing, the offensive line was much
>    improved, the running game was coming around, Bucky was Gawd, and the
>    doinks were just about a lock for representing the AFC in the 'Big
>    Dance' as Art would put it. And now you guys are talking possible
>    wild-card spots for the donks, or even worse, the donks possibly
>    sitting at home for the playoffs......
  
Carlos, I wish you wouldn't generalize by saying "youze guys" because I never
said they were the favorite to reach Pasadena or how great the defense has been
playing.  I think the defense has been a big disappointment this year, the game
against the Giants withstanding.  The O-line is coming around and played decent
against the Faiders this past week - the offensive line isn't one of the main
reasons they lost.

Going into this 6-game homestretch, I expected Denver to lose at LA, Luckalo,
and KC, and win the rest to finish 10-6.  So given that, the only they'd win
the division is if they go into KC with a 2-game lead, and it doesn't look like
that's gonna be the case.  KC has won 3 in a row since the break and, quite
honestly, I expected them to lose *at least* 1 of the past 3.  The bottom line
is, it looks like the division will come down to the last game at KC and I
don't think Denver will win that game.
 
Anyway, you're just saying that "we" said Denver is the favorite to take the
AFC but you know I don't think that (right now), so just single out who you're
talking about or address your notes to them.  Hell, we all know who you're
talking about anyway.  :^)


Joe
36.1518It's all my fault Joe... QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Nov 24 1992 15:0912
    
    Joe...  you're pretty snooty about all this...  Let Carloskiwitz
    have his fun and don't take it personal.  Deflect all the heat to
    me cause "we all know who hes talking about anyway"  Lighten up,
    dude.  You know what you write, only answer to that. I'll take car of 
    the rest.
    
     Carloskiwitz,  What the scoop on TM...?  The Denver Post says that
    he's been demoted to 3rd string QB.  What gives...  Did it "Snow"
    in LA when we weren't looking or what?
    
    BG
36.1519BSS::JCOTANCHTue Nov 24 1992 17:0317
    
>    Joe...  you're pretty snooty about all this...  Let Carloskiwitz
>    have his fun and don't take it personal.  Deflect all the heat to
>    me cause "we all know who hes talking about anyway"  Lighten up,
>    dude.  You know what you write, only answer to that. I'll take car of 
>    the rest.
    
I don't think I'm being snotty (assuming that's what you meant) about this - I
just thought I'd ask Carlos if he'd be more direct about who he's talking to,
since he was referring to previous notes regarding predictions of Denver taking
the AFC.  I'm not trying to take away from Carlos' fun either.  It's just that 
when he says "you guys", it makes it sound like we're *all* unrealistic Bronco 
fans wearing orange colored glasses when you're the only one talking the note
up with these predictions.  


Joe
36.1520ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Nov 24 1992 17:2814
    Somebody pleez take the coffee mug away from Joe before he really gets
    uptight and kills a million or so people at the Cinderella shopping
    mall (or is that in Dallas?), and when the authorities do finally
    subdue Joe, he's mumbling something about DEC's new philosophies, and
    Carloskiwitz generalizing and lumping all doink fans together...:-)
    
    BG, I don't know what the deal with TM is...I think maybe when Shredder
    was benched he took it like a man and supported TM, but now that the
    foot's on the other shoe, TM's proberly snivelling about it, and showing
    his maturity (or lack thereof). Of course this is just speckylation on
    my part, but that's what I figure is happening.
    
    Carlitos-ski
    
36.1521PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 24 1992 17:375
36.1522SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Tue Nov 24 1992 17:472
       I'll bet he ain't even painted his dawg orange yet!!
                                   Denny
36.1523GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Tue Nov 24 1992 18:075
    
    	How could we be Mac?  We've got so many *objective* noters
    	in here to keep us in our place! :*)
    
    Claybroon
36.1524right off the pressQUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Nov 24 1992 18:4125
    
     Sorry Joe...  I kinda accidently for the :^)
    
      I ain't painted the dog yet but I did buy the paint...
    It's only a matter of time.
    
     Carlitos Ski...  I was wondering,  you think there might have
    been an unexpected "SNOW" fall in L.A....  TM has had a record 
    of substance abuse in the past and I can't see Art putting up
    with it (at least not during the season).
    
     Interesting note in todays sports page.  Reeves lambasted the
    Bronco players say that they played the game against the Raiders
    like it was a preseason game.  He said he wasn't so sure that his
    players even wanted to make the playoffs judging by the way they 
    played.  He also eluded to their sorry a$$ed record on the road 
    as a show stopper for the up comin playoffs.  You could tell he 
    was pissed that they got blown out on top of getting beat.
    
     In other new...  I heard Elway tried to throw again today without
    success.  I guess he's hurt pretty bad.  He said that he thought he'd
    be ready to play this week but I wouldn't bet the farm on it.  They
    really ought to sit him down another week.  
    
    BG
36.1525tolda he was a big sissy!!! ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSDontcha miss Charlie's Angels reruns?Tue Nov 24 1992 18:520
36.1526QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Nov 24 1992 18:5810
    Childs...  I was wondering what happened to ya...  I don't miss
    Charlies Angles reruns but I do miss your p-name from lasted(tm) 
    week.  Elway ain't no sissy.  In FACK(tm) he is one of the most
    durrable QB ever to play the game.  He Big, Strong and tough as 
    nails.  Hell,  75% of the girly mon QB's in the league won't even try
    to pick up a fe extra yards like our man John.  
    
    Big Bad John is #1,
    
    BG
36.1527PFSVAX::JACOBNewcastle Brown'll sure smack ya downTue Nov 24 1992 19:018
    
    >>durrable QB ever to play the game.  He Big, Strong and tough as 
    >>nails. 
    
    Not to mention he smells like a dead decomposing fish!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
36.1528As nails that isMSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionTue Nov 24 1992 19:184
    
     >> Elway ain't no sissy. He Big, Strong and tough as nails.  
    
        And every bit as smart.
36.1529Chevy, Apple Pie and John Elway !!!QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Nov 24 1992 20:217
    Youze girls are getting on my nerves...   Elway graduated from Stanford
    with honors,  he ain't no dummy.  And Jake,  any self respecting
    football player always comes into game day smelling like dead
    decomposing fish.  Get a clue ladies... either one of the organizations
    you back (footbal that is) would kill to have BBJ at the helm.
    
    BG
36.1530QUASER::JACKSONTABG + Carlos=KOD nauseaTue Nov 24 1992 22:454
      Elway was dumb for trying to get an extra yard on that run, which was
    2nd and 9 if I remember correctly.
    
      Start Shawn Moore!!!
36.1531CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 25 1992 02:5418
    There's a number of ways you can look at that game sunday.
    
    1. The Raiders are a far superior team than the Broncos or
       any of the other 1/2 dozen or so teams that have beaten them
       so far this season. 
    
    2. This is the price you pay for breaking in your future.
    
    3. The Broncos are a far inferior team without Mr. Ed in the
       saddle.  Everybody (except a few) knew that anyway.
    
    It might sound like I've been drinking out of Carlos' cup
    but overall, I thought Maddox did reasonably well.  He 
    threw 2 picks down deep but it was the int returns that 
    killed them.  The Raiders were primed to initiate the guy
    and who could blame them?
    
    BoB
36.1532?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinWed Nov 25 1992 13:027
36.1533CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 25 1992 17:5010
    Did anybody see KC at SEattle sunday night?  The Seahawks have
    the worst record in the league right now.  Time and time again
    their qb blew it big time.  This guy ( and I can't recall his name)
    could make Todd M. look good.  Seattle showed an overall decent
    defense and the new back Warren following J.L's blocks looked
    very painfull. Monday night with a home crowd against the Broncos
    could prove interesting.  There is probably nothing Seattle likes 
    doing more than beating Denver.  
    
    BoB
36.1534TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Nov 25 1992 17:593
    
    I saw the remaining MNF sched yesterday, and they all look like pretty
    bad games.
36.1535CSC32::SALZERWed Nov 25 1992 18:014
    Funny thing about any given game is you never can tell 
    what's going to be good or bad.  
    
    BoB
36.1536QUASER::JACKSONTABG + Carlos=KOD nauseaWed Nov 25 1992 18:079
      re- MNF,   I agree Bob,  There haven't been to many good MN games
    this year.  This past one was billed to be great,  but it was boring
    and a romp.
    
      Next weeks will probably be good to watch. 
    
      Watch for Denver to have to pull it out in the 4th.
    
      Tim
36.1537CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Nov 25 1992 18:119
Bob,

The Seattle QB was named Kelly Stouffer.  I know, because I knocked him
on his butt in a bar in Federal Way.

Ask JD....


'Saw
36.1538MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionWed Nov 25 1992 18:122
    
     Really, `Saw ?!?!? Please elaborate.
36.1539Ugh!CSC32::KINSELLAit's just a wheen o' blethersWed Nov 25 1992 20:487
    
    Too bad my birthday isn't every weekend.  Boo Hoo...
    Angonizing game.  I watch every grueling second of it.
    I just don't understand why the D even bothered to suit
    up...they certainly didn't show up.
    
    Jill
36.1540Home for the Holidays too huh?ELMAGO::CGRIEGOBeholdTheLambOfGodThatTakesAwaySinTue Dec 01 1992 09:2911
    Heh heh heh......the doinks almost pulled off a major upset of the
    powerful seahawks in O.T......:-)
    
    And with the Cowboys, Bills, and again the powerful seahawks, and
    lastly the Chiefs left on the doinks schedule, they'll be lucky to be
    at .500 when it's all over.
    
    HtH
    
    Carloskiwitz
    
36.1541WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsTue Dec 01 1992 11:493
    
    
    Donks and all TM's Sip......
36.1542real busy but had to comment on this debachleQUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 01 1992 12:287
    
     HA !!!   What a friggen joke !!!  Typical Dan Reeves %^&%^^$%& 
    football.  Oh well,  Seasons over, donks stay home for the holidays.
    Bet they get their asses kick real bad at home by Dallas next week.
    
    
    BG
36.1543BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 01 1992 12:564
    As devastating as a loss can get.  No way in hell they should've lost
    that one, but somehow found a way.
    
    Joe
36.1544P UGENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Tue Dec 01 1992 13:4010
    
    	That one really hurt.  Carlos is right.  They'll be home
    	for the Holidays.
    
    	I hope #31 gets his walking papers today.  He's not the 
    	sole reason they lost but he sure helped in a big way.
    	He's lucky they didn't tack another 15 yards onto that
    	facemask penalty for slugging that Seahawk......
    
    Claybroon
36.1545Hey Carlos maybe we cain trade Toad for Tommy Gun ?OURGNG::RIGGENHey Bill is chicken pluckin a good career move?Tue Dec 01 1992 13:4312
Denver played the worst game of the season last night. 

nexted to the Philadelphia 

nexted to the Washington

nexted to the Raider

lets just say the entire team sipped last night and I am very happy that I only 
watched the perfect Mark Jackson TD catch...

Jeff
36.1546BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 01 1992 14:1935
If ever a game epitomized Denver's lack of a killer instinct, this was it.  I'm
still shocked that they managed to lose this game.  For the first time since
who knows when, I felt Denver was in total control of a game away from home. 
About the only thing that would get Seattle back into the game in the 4th
quarter would be a turnover, but even after Marshall coughed up the ball on a
punt return the 'Hawks still couldn't manage any points.     

Denver's offense was nonexistent after the first quarter, although they were 
dealing with terrible field position for much of the game.  It probably won't 
be mentioned much, but Seattle's punter deserves alot of the credit for this 
win.  Reeves opened the game with some aggressive play-calling, but went
conservative after Maddox threw an interception on a short, routine pass in 
the flat that was almost returned for a TD.  The other factor that made Reeves
go conservative was Denver's constant poor field position.

One thing you have to wonder about is why Reeves didn't go to Shawn Moore when
the offense went flat in the latter stages of the game.  Here's a guy who
probably would've done well against Seattle's aggressive d-line with his
running ability.  Nobody asked Reeves after the game why he didn't do this, but
his response would've been that they have confidence in Maddox and he is their
QB of the future and needs to be in a situation like this and learn.  I'll
agree with that, but this wasn't the time to be giving the guy experience or
learning time.  The bottom line is this team is (or at least was) very much in
the hunt for a playoff berth and they desperately needed a win last night, 
regardless of how the hell they got it.  The single biggest element in Seattle
coming back to tie the game was them changing QB's.  

Nevertheless, Denver had numerous opportunities to put this game away and just
didn't do it.  The biggest play down the stretch was probably the face-mask on
the punt return that gave Seattle the ball at the Denver 30.  


Joe
                                   

36.1547WKRP::LEETCHUS Messaging Practice DTN 432-7628Tue Dec 01 1992 14:427
Re: MNF

What happened? I went to bed after Seattle couldn't score after the 4th quarter
fumbled punt and trailing 13-3. Seattle's offense had looked completely 
pathetic. Driving to work this AM I hear Seattle won 16-13.

Bruce
36.1548CSC32::J_HERNANDEZGetting back in touch.Tue Dec 01 1992 14:591
    Too funny.
36.1549Donks SIp BIGTIME!!PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckTue Dec 01 1992 15:139
    I guess that'll teach ya to go to bed early, eh????
    
    Seattle "manhandled" the Donks, as the Donks snorted a whole big pile
    of Seachicken SLOF's lasted night.
    
    The Steeler's should keel the Seachickens!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
36.1550LJOHUB::CRITZTue Dec 01 1992 17:549
    	Dierdorf kept saying it last night, "Denver keeps trying to
    	lose the game ...."
    
    	If he said it once, he said it five times.
    
    	I thought Denver tried hard to lose and Seattle looked like
    	a bunch of Keystone Kops.
    
    	Scott
36.1551CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Tue Dec 01 1992 18:027
I thought the SeaHawks were bad a few years ago when I went to the 
hawks-Browns game in teh 'dome with Chainsaw.  Remember that 'exciting'
game Frank.

But this edition is pathetic.  They look like a PAC10 team.  ;-0

JD
36.1552AXIS::ROBICHAUDAHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboroTue Dec 01 1992 18:084
    	Actually the SeaChickens are about as offensively exciting as
    a Little Ten school...
    
    				/Don
36.1553NWD002::JOLMAMAI'm a Romper Room DO BEE.Tue Dec 01 1992 18:206
    But what about the SeaHawk defense?  Don't hear much Bronko babble on
    this matter?
    
    I agree with JD, the PAC10 teams are close to the NFL!
    
    Matt the Mariner
36.1554CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Tue Dec 01 1992 18:3013
Matt -

given the problems the Huskies have had wif drugs and everything (along
wif other Pac10 schools), they do seem like the NFL.   Glad to see you
back in here after the Dawgs were exposed for the pretenders that they were.

Caint wait for them to play a main's schedule...

And are the Pac10 defenses overrated?  After all, USC had a top defense 
against the run, and Notre Dame went through them like a hot knife through
Shedd's Spread....

JD
36.1555BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 01 1992 18:3817
>    	Dierdorf kept saying it last night, "Denver keeps trying to
>    	lose the game ...."
>    
>    	If he said it once, he said it five times.
    
That's what I can't stand about Dierdork - the way he overemphasizes his
points.  He seems to have some pretty good points and analyses, but the way he
drags on about something is extremely irritating.  A typical Dierdork analysis
might go something like this (read at about half your normal reading speed to 
get the true effect): "WHAT - AN - *INCREDIBLE* - COACHING - DECISION - BY - 
MR. - SHULA.  - *THAT*, - LADIES - AND - GENTLEMEN, - IS - AN - EXCELLENT - 
EXAMPLE - OF - WHY - DON - SHULA - IS - ONE - OF - THE - GREATEST - COACHES
- IN - THE - HISTORY - OF - THE - NATIONAL - FOOTBALL - LEAGUE."  Now he
proceeds to talk about Don Shula for the next 10 minutes. 


Joe
36.1556What is the story with next years draft ?????DEVOTN::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 01 1992 18:435
    The Seachickens blew there #1 pick by dropping the donks last night.
    There now tied with NE, the only other team that seattle beat so NE
    now holds the #1 pick in next years (if)Draft.  So I guess the only
    teams the Seahawks can beat is Denver and New England :-)...
    								MaB
36.1557DECWET::CROUCHLiving example of God's bad tasteTue Dec 01 1992 18:5613
    Last night's game was the most pathetic, inept, futile effort I've
    ever seen in the NFL.  Stouffer is without a doubt the worst starting
    QB in the league.  He can't read a defense, he doesn't get rid of
    the ball, he has no clue when he's about to get sacked, he's immobile,
    and he's injury-prone.
    
    I was bummed that the SeaChokes pulled it out.  But, they won't win
    again this year.  If NE wins one more, the Chokes have the #1 pick
    wrapped up.  And, they had better take Drew Bledsoe.  The only worse
    QB in the league than Stouffer is the Chokes' backup, Dan McGwire,
    who's about as mobile as an apartment building.
    
    Pete 
36.1558GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Tue Dec 01 1992 19:078
    re. Seahawk's D
    
    	They played very well last night.......against a 21 year old
    	rookie QB.  However, I'd love to have Kennedy and Porter in
    	an orange uniform.
    
    Claybroon
    
36.1559JARETH::YANKOWSKASDEC = Wang Version 2.0Tue Dec 01 1992 19:1213
    re .1557:
    
    Pete, don't sweat it if the Seahawks end up with the 2nd overall pick
    behind New England, the Pats will find a way to blow it and you'll get
    the guy you want. :-)
    
    
    Another noter here who saw just the first quarter, figured the Broncos
    would roll, and woke up this morning very surprised at the outcome.
    Had to make sure it was the first of December and not of April...
    
    
    py                   
36.1560ulgy, uglyr to ugliest!QUASER::JACKSONTABG + Carlos=KOD nauseaTue Dec 01 1992 19:5121
       What is Reeves thinking when he is calling the plays?  I agree that
    Shawn Moore shoulda been playing,  but I've said that all season (only
    when Biffy can't play)...  TM2 kept advertising whom he was throwing
    to.  Thats why he is getting picked on the LEFT side!!
    
    At the end of regulation (seattles last poss,  the prevent defense?!?!
    Prevent from winning defense that is!!!
    
      The donks definetly don't deserve to go to the playoffs if they can't
    beat the sorry 'hawks!!  I say put collie to pasture and let Wade
    Phillips or a real offensive coord take the head position.  Can't be
    any worse at play calling.
    
    
      At least Atwater finally had a decent game.
    
      I hope Elway is back for the cowgirls.  If so,  he will be rusty, 
    but he can't be any worse than we have seen the last 2 weeks.
    
    
       Tim
36.1561MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionTue Dec 01 1992 19:563
    
     Woe is me. The Donks fans suffer another humiliating defeat. During
    the regular season no less. Let me slit my wrists.
36.1562Go length wise it's quicker...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsTue Dec 01 1992 20:0010
    
                Heres the razor... :-}
    
                ------------
                |          |
                ------------
                
    
    
                
36.1563QUASER::JACKSONTAReeves and play calling don't mixTue Dec 01 1992 20:091
      Isn't commiting suicide at work against policy?
36.1564Talk about bad football....BALBOA::PUGHTue Dec 01 1992 20:2711
    On behalf of all Charger players, coaches, their wives, fans, and
    anybody else who cares, I want to personally thank the Donks for a 
    fabulous effort last night.  Based on what I saw in the 1st quarter,
    I too figured this was a slam dunk win for the Donksters.  Then I 
    turned the TV back on in the 4th quarter and got an early XMAS 
    present!
    
    Doug
    
    P.S. The SeaClucks are a sorry lot, but that Kennedy is a real man!
                                      
36.1565A Dork is a Dork of course of coursePEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Dec 01 1992 21:1615
>That's what I can't stand about Dierdork - the way he overemphasizes his      
>points.  He seems to have some pretty good points and analyses, but the way he
>drags on about something is extremely irritating.

  I agree with you on everything you said except..

>He seems to have some pretty good points and analyses.

  It seems like half the time he's wrong and the other half he says things
  that my 2 year son can figure out. DorkDork has got to be the worst
  prime time color analyst I've ever heard. 
  
  Give me Dave Logan anyday .. please.

	Keith 
36.1566DECWET::CROUCHLiving example of God's bad tasteTue Dec 01 1992 21:3212
    re .1559
    
    Paul, I must admit I turned it off in the third quarter.  Hell, the 
    Chokes can barely score once a game, much less twice in a little over
    a quarter.  I turned it back on to catch the OT.  You should hear the
    radio call in shows here in Seattle.  Long-suffering fans are wetting
    their pants over the win.  Hey, folks.  The 'hawks still have the worst
    offense IN THE HISTORY OF THE FRIGGIN' NFL!!!  They're averaging 7
    lousy points a game.  Last night was either their best or second best
    offensive output of the year.  
    
    Pete (long-suffering Seattle sports fan)
36.1567Cowboys vs BroncosCSC32::SALZERWed Dec 02 1992 02:148
    This game was not bad. It was horrible. That was about the
    sorriest excuse for a football game witnessed lately. 
    It felt like it took about 6.5 hours to complete with little
    to no entertainment value.  As bad as it might be, there  is 
    one thing that can turn the season around. Beat Dallas on
    sunday and all will be right with the world again. Maybe.
    
    BoB
36.1568ELMAGO::BENBACAI've got three knees!!Wed Dec 02 1992 03:581
    It's possible. The cowboys have never faired well in Denver.
36.1569CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Wed Dec 02 1992 12:1614
Pete -
Without a doubt, Monday's game rivaled the epic Giants/Cardinals OT Monday Night
Thriller (I believe ending in a 20-20 tie) of many moons ago.  Neil O'Donahue missed
4 field goals, including 2 or 3 in OT in that game.

Cheer up.  YOu could still gave Ground Chuck as coach, and the Hawks would play
just well enought to be in the playoff hunt...


Maybe they can do a nice rebuilding job.  Kennedy is a damn fine ball player.  A
Bledsoe would be a great pickup - and even if the Pats do get #1, I doubt they
would draft a QB #1.

JD
36.1570ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Wed Dec 02 1992 12:199
    JD,
    
    I was thinking about that Giants/Cardinals classic as OT was winding
    down. Last tie in the NFL was November 1989. Both teams on Monday night
    deserved to lose; since that is not possible an badly played tie would
    have been most appropriate.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1571John Elway exposed againCNTROL::CHILDSKaroke Hockey catch the fever!Wed Dec 02 1992 12:208
Speaking of Bif, what a girly-mon out with a bad tendon? Give me a break..
How many countless stories have we heard of real men playing with broken
bones etc? Not Bif though. My theory is that he knew the begining of the 
season was shear luck and now the fiddler has to be payed. He ducked out
while he could....

mike
36.1572GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Wed Dec 02 1992 12:477
    
    	Aw come on MikeyC.  Quit trying to imitate Hoot.  :*)
    
    	Tommy, aren't you a Pats fan?  I guess you're suffering
    	more than us so you're allowed........
    
    Claybroon
36.1573MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionWed Dec 02 1992 13:1017
    
   >> Tommy, aren't you a Pats fan?  I guess you're suffering
   >> more than us so you're allowed........
    
      Yes Claybroon, I am a Pats fan. However, my suffering was over 
      at about week four of the season when I resigned myself to the
      fact that this year's team stinks. I can still get excited about 
      things like the semi-emergence of Scott Zolak and John Vaughn or 
      the Pro Bowl calibre of play of Vincent Brown but my expectations
      ain't all that high. Donks fans on the other hand will die a thou-
      sand deaths before this season is over and then another thousand
      in the off-season rehashing what might have been and what went wrong
      and I must admit I take some pleasure in that. That's just the kind
      of sicko I am.
    
    
      _Tommy
36.1574GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Wed Dec 02 1992 13:394
    
    	I see.  In other words, misery loves company. :*)  Enjoy!
    
    Claybroon
36.1575only Denver will doNWD002::JOLMAMAI'm a Romper Room DO BEE.Wed Dec 02 1992 18:208
    The joy in Seattle is not based upon the belief that the Hawks have
    turned the corner.  It is because Seattle, the worst team in the NFL, 
    embarrased the despised Donkos, in prime time, in an utterly inglorious,
    and amateurish manner.  No other victory could be as sweet.
    
    Still in a state of bliss,
    
    Matt the Mariner 
36.1576CSC32::SALZERWed Dec 02 1992 19:569
    
    Well, it always has been said that ignorance is bliss.
    It's still reassuring  that SEattle knows they
    havn't turned the corner. At least they have some grip on
    reality. 
    Anybody know when the last time Dallas played at Denver?
    I think it has been less than 4 years.  
    
    BoB
36.1577BSS::JCOTANCHWed Dec 02 1992 20:135
    Dallas last played at Denver in 1986 and the Broncos won by a score of
    29-14 (I think!).  Denver hasn't played at Dallas in the regular season
    in quite a while - '77 might be the last time.
    
    Joe
36.1578CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Dec 03 1992 11:5912
JD, 

I could never forget that game or our two "home boys" from Vancouver.


The thing I could not get over about the MNF game was when the Seahawks
put in Gelbaugh, it was like a completely and radically different team.

Stouffer shoulda stayed on his butt in that bar, eh, JD?


'Saw
36.1579Tell me this isn't true, pleaseeeeeeeQUASER::JACKSONTAReeves and play calling don't mixThu Dec 03 1992 12:4914
      I hope this is a joke!  Reeves stated that if Elway isn't ready to
    go, that he would do a 2 QB rotation every other play.
    
      If its really in his thick head to do something like that,  then it
    just tells me that he doesn't have the gonads to admit he should of
    played Shawn Moore instead of Maddox these past 2 weeks,  plus he is
    worried about TM2's feelings.  Give me a break!
    
      I wanted to hurl when seeing that.
    
      Of course Dallas was the last team to do this,  and if he does go
    with it,  Dallas will eat them alive IMO.
    
        Tim
36.1580QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterFri Dec 04 1992 12:4219
     
     My money says that Reeves ain't coaching the Broncos next year
    if he pulls a stunt like that.  Hell,  he might not be there 
    anyway if what you read in the local rag is true.
    
     Heard on the way into work this morning that Elway is out for this
    weeks game after seeing the doctor.  Man,  that hit he took just 
    didn't look that bad...  John's getting old and it's taking him a 
    lot longer to heal than it used to.  
    
     Tim,  As far as the rotation of the QB goes...  it don't matter,
    the season is done.  Denver will have to win 3 of the last 4 to
    have a shot at getting the snot kicked out of them in the playoffs
    and we know that aint gonna happen without a healthy Elway !
    
    
    BG
    
    
36.1581QUASER::JACKSONTAReeves and play calling don't mixFri Dec 04 1992 22:264
     This weekends game might end up looking like a road game if ya know
    what I mean!
    
    	Tim
36.1582Not as bad as its potetential.QUASER::JACKSONTAReeves and play calling don't mixMon Dec 07 1992 12:5027
       Turnovers killed the donks yesterday.  Reeves finally calls a good
    offensive game plan (except the QB rotation), and Maddox gives the ball
    up 5x, and 4 of those were critical.  1 was a hail mary at half.  It
    was 14-0 within the 1st 5 mins (Dallas).  The donks hung in there and
    actually had the lead at one point.
    
      I thought the donks overall played a great game despite losing to the
    supposed best team in the NFL. 
    
      The defense shut down Emmit from running for the most part.  Sloppy
    tackling on dump passes hurt the defense.
    
      No turnovers went towards denver.  The had 1 chance for TO, but
    Aikman was able to grab the ball back before  Kragen got his paws on
    it.
    
      Maddox showed yesterday that he has the potential,  but still is not
    ready.  His IMO is killing denver with his turnovers.  Yes Biff does to
    at times,  but not at the rate TM2 does.
    
      Shawn Moore started slow, but came along just fine for not being able
    to get in the rythm.
    
      Next game is Saturday I beleive.  Buffalo isn't looking real
    impressive,  so that means they may wake up, but who knows.
    
      Tim
36.1583CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Dec 07 1992 12:5322
>      I thought the donks overall played a great game despite losing to the
>    supposed best team in the NFL. 

For my money, I still think that San Fran is better than Dallas.  More
weapons.  But I'd say Dallas is running a close #2.  

Randy Cross, calling the Giants game, kept saying how Dallas had such
great team speed.  That's very important.

    
>      Next game is Saturday I beleive.  Buffalo isn't looking real
>    impressive,  so that means they may wake up, but who knows.
    
OJ was saying how it takes Buffalo a few games to get out of a slump,
so you might just have a chance.   

Kelly looked terrible late in yesterday's game....




'Saw
36.1584NWD002::JOLMAMAI'm a Romper Room DO BEE.Mon Dec 07 1992 14:193
    Dandy Don, you are needed in Denver.  Croon that old tune of yours
    'turn out the lights, the party's over'.
    
36.1585Playoffs are looking bleaker by the weekBSS::JCOTANCHMon Dec 07 1992 14:4627
    Pretty good game - Denver did much better than most people thought they
    would, especially after getting down 14-0 very quickly.  And if someone
    would've said before the game that Denver would turn the ball over 5
    times and Dallas none, nobody would've given them a chance.
    
    I can't believe Reeves actually went thru with the QB rotation deal. 
    Definitely one of the stranger things I've ever seen in a football
    game.  It turned out pretty good however, but I still think it's better
    to have one guy in there running the offense so he can get into the
    flow of the game. 
    
    Defense played a good game, but for the 2nd week in a row they couldn't
    hold the opposition on the final drive.  
    
    I liked the way Vance to motioning to the crowd by pointing to Maddox
    after Vance scored a TD.  He was basically saying, hey, quit booing
    this guy and give him some credit.  However, I think most of the boos
    weren't really directed at Maddox, but just at the fact that he was
    playing instead of Moore.
    
    Denver definitely needs to win one of their 2 road game to have a shot
    at the playoffs now.  You figure if the Jets can win at Luckalo just
    about anybody can - but I have hardly any confidence in this Bronco
    team on the road.
    
    
    Joe
36.1586OURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodMon Dec 07 1992 16:130
36.1587Help we've fallen and can't get upOURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodMon Dec 07 1992 16:198
Not even the mile high majic could pull this rabbit out of the hat. 

Hey Dan Reeves is Shannon Sharpe only a blocker. I know Clarence Kay has 
dropped a few passes this season does that make him ineligable. 

I liked the rotation piece I wouldn't mind seeing more of that type of offense.

Jeff 
36.1588CNTROL::CHILDSI must not think Bad ThoughtsTue Dec 08 1992 15:121
So I hear BBJ (Big Baby John) plans to sit out another..what a wuss....
36.1589Sure it hurts....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Wed Dec 09 1992 10:3720
36.1590shredder sips sonQUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksWed Dec 09 1992 16:1219
      Fans have wanted Reeves' head for awhile now.  Most of the media is
    already blasting him.
    
      As to Biffy, you know that he has to be about %100 to throw those 5
    yard drill balls or especially those 50 yard cross field balls, so if
    hes at %50 or whatever,  then you know that
    playing him would just cause more int's.  Then again,  it can't be
    worse than TM2.
    
      I also didn't think the hit that he took was that bad looking,  but I
    see people end up with those deep bruises that last for 1-2 months just
    by "nipping" into a table or chair as they walk by.    If you think
    about it, the hit that Bo took on his hip wasn't that rough looking and
    look what happened to him.  Those kinda hits happen in every game.
    
       Some say he may not play again this year.  I disagree,  but we will
    see.  He won't play this sat.
    
      Tim
36.1591Pay is the SAMEOURGNG::RIGGENWill Note for foodThu Dec 10 1992 18:217
I think BBJ found out that if your hurt you get paid the same as you do if
you play. Seems that this is a easy early season Vacation. 
I would love to see this rotation thang with TM and BBJ Denver needs a good 
play fake and TM cain do that but if they need 10 on 3rd down BBJ has about as
many weapons as Randall C. To make that type of magic work. 

Jeff
36.1592pre-game capsuleELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Fri Dec 11 1992 12:2147
    Taken off the internet:
    
    
                             Saturday, Dec. 12
                        Denver (7-6) at Buffalo (9-4)
            Favorite -- Buffalo by 14.
            Turf -- Artificial.
            Rankings -- Denver: 24th on offense, 22nd rushing, 20th
    passing. 24th
    on defense, 23rd rushing 23rd passing. Buffalo: 2nd on offense, 2nd
    rushing, 4th passing. 12th on defense, 4th rushing, 22nd passing.
            Broncos -- This will be the 500th game in franchise history and
    the
    Broncos could have picked a better place to play it. Without QB John
    Elway, who has an injured shoulder tendon, Dener is 0-3. The Broncos
    came close to upsetting Dalla last week with Tommy Maddox and Shawn
    Moore alternating plays at QB. Even when playing, Elway has not had not
    had the best of seasons despite leading three late rallies that have
    kept Denver in the playoff picture.
    
            Bills -- Buffalo can clinch a playoff spot with a win, but the
    Bills
    have managed to lose their last two. The Bills have two home losses for
    the first time since 1989. They have not lost as many as three home
    games since 1987. Offense has sputtered of late, but QB Jim Kelly still
    leads the league in TD passes (22) and RB Thurman Thoma is second in
    the AFC with 1,155 rushing yards. S Henry Jones leads the NFL with
    eight interceptions.
    
            Keys to the Game -- In last year's AFC title game, Denver
    stayed close
    by putting pressure on Kelly and disrupting him all day. The Bills did
    not score an offensive touchdown in that game. Denver must have more of
    the same, much more.
            Head-to-head -- Buffalo leads, 16-10-1, winning their last
    meeting
    which came in last season's AFC championship game.
            Streaks -- For the second time this season, Buffalo is facing a
    three-
    game losing streak if it falls to Denver. The Bills have had only one
    such losing streak in the last five years.
    
    HtH...
    
    Carloski
                                            
    
36.1593Donks By 27 !QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterFri Dec 11 1992 20:496
    
     Donks should win this game...  No question that this Denver team
    out classes the slobs from Luckalo.  Look for Jim Kelly to have his
    Tutu on this weekend...  Dancing with Lofton on the side lines !
    
    Bg
36.1594ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Sat Dec 12 1992 23:216
    re: .1593
    
    Get thee to the Crow note - quickly!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1595To the Crow note indeed!ELMAGO::BENBACAI've Got Three Knees!!Sun Dec 13 1992 01:394
    Denver plays well at home but on the road they stink. I can smell em
    all the way over here in Albuquerque! Phew!!
    
    I hope your hungry  :^)
36.1596No Elway = no winsQUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksMon Dec 14 1992 12:3316
        Did maddox and moore change jersey's on the flight to luckalo or
    what?  So much for my thoughts of moore being better than maddox.  He
    had 5 turnovers which the bills didn't turn any off them into points, 
    but still stopped denver from getting into a "swing".
    
      As usual,  denvers defense croaks at the end of the game,  but then
    again the offense croaked the 1st half.
    
      Denver is still in the hunt for a wildcard,  but is unlikely to get
    one.
    
      Seattle almost beat the iggles yesterday,  so this seachicken team is
    primed to upset again.  they had 10 sacks on the leaper yesterday. 
    most impressive!
    
        Tim
36.1597Should be AFC Weak not West....ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Dec 14 1992 15:178
36.1598QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksMon Dec 14 1992 15:2514
      Of course Elway isn't the only guy on the team,  its just that the QB
    rotation has turned the ball over 5x each in the last 2 games, and had
    critical turnovers that they(he) couldn't overcome the previous 2
    games before that (seattle, la).
    
      You know how  it is when your team doesn't have a good QB Carlos!
    
      If Shredhead is presured tonight, then the faids will lose. If he has
    good protection,  then they stand a good chance to win, though you know
    I would rather see the fish win!
    
    	HTH
    
    	Tim
36.1599ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Dec 14 1992 18:315
    Speaking of Bucky, he says that 'there's no question' he'll be ready to
    play nexted weekend against the suddenly tough seahawks.
    
    CG
    
36.1600too little, too lateFRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VMon Dec 14 1992 19:001
    Seems like the Seahawks always put together late-season strings.
36.1601DECWET::METZGERThis space being flea bombed..Mon Dec 14 1992 19:1612
the only tough thing about the chickenhawks is the defense...the offense only
managed 87 yards in 5 quarters yesterday. The defense recorded 89 yards in QB
sacks..

All you need to do is kick one field goal and then sit on the ball and not 
let the defense get a big turnover for points....

Chickenhawks ain't tough....


Metz
36.1602QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksMon Dec 14 1992 20:368
      re-1  That means the iggles ain't tough either?
    
      Denver will win this game with or without Biff....
    
      Why do I say that,  'cause its in Denver and the donks very rarely
    lose 2 home games in a row.  Elway will be a plus no doubt about it!
    
     Tim
36.1603BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingMon Dec 14 1992 21:246
    
    It's interesting that the Broncos are scoring more points now than when
    Elway was in at QB.  Of course, there're alot more turnovers too.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
36.1604QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksTue Dec 15 1992 12:479
      Good point Glenn.
    
      When Elway started the jets & jints,  they scored 27 in both I
    beleive.  The 1st 2 games without biff weren't that great, 
    0 at la and what 10 or 13 at seattle?  Actually,  in the last 4 games, 
    I think that all the defenses that they went up against were ranked
    within the top 10 of the NFL.
    
      Tim
36.1605BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 15 1992 13:297
    Well, the playoffs are all but out of the question at this point. 
    If SD or KC wins this week, Denver can't win the division.  For a
    wildcard, they'll need a loss by Houston, which is very probable since
    the Oilers play Cleveland and Luckalo.  The biggest hurdle for Denver
    right now will be winning in KC.
    
    Joe
36.1606QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksTue Dec 15 1992 14:562
      The biggest hurdle is for Denver to win this weekend,  which I think
    they will!!
36.1607PlayoffsROCK::MURPHYWed Dec 16 1992 16:3213
Comment on this...

IF (big if) Denver wins their last two, they make the playoffs if Houston loses
either game or if KC loses to the Giants, or if SD loses both, or if Miami
loses two.

I think one of the support scenarios will occur, so if Denver can win out they
can get into the wildcard games, but will have to play on the road three
times - no chance.  But at least they get one extra game.

What is Elway's status?

Murph
36.1608METSNY::francusMets in '93Wed Dec 16 1992 17:473
Elway will reportedly play in this weeks game.

The Crazy Met
36.1609QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterWed Dec 16 1992 21:4411
    
     Elway will play...  However,  there is still no "official" line
    on the game.  Looks like the bookies are waiting to see if its really
    true.  Denver will be at leasta 7 pt fav. if John starts.  Look for 
    3 (homefield) if he doesn't go.  The Donks may make the `offs but
    playing on the road they won't go far.  I would love to see them get
    to take a bite outta the Fish before they go down though.  The KC
    game is going to be the factor that allows the donks into the `offs.
    The seachicken are a mail in with BBJ back !!
    
    BG
36.1610Go Seachickens!!!CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway NFL Baby of the Year WinnerThu Dec 17 1992 12:255
Looks like Big Baby will start this week. High dramatics as always with this
baby. Figures he'll look like a savior if he can lead his team to two late 
victories. What a sham!!! 

mike
36.1611GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Thu Dec 17 1992 13:227
    
    	Forget about Elway coming back for a moment.....
    
    	The biggest news out of Denver is that the barrel man is
    	retiring after this Sunday!
    
    Claybroon
36.1612He is naked under that?QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 17 1992 13:5123
      I hear ya Claybroon,  he's been wearin' that thing for 15 years!?
    
      I guess that heart attack thathe had 1-2 years ago did him in, 'cause
    it couldn't be all that cold weather and snow^)
    
      I hear that Wymon has finally be benched, mainly do to his injury, 
    now the problem is they put in Dimry.  He isn't that much better if at
    all.  Li lo Lang will also see action which is good.
    
      Shane Dronnett will start for Brian Sochia.
    
      Cedric Tillman will start for the Vance. I guess Vance is hurt again!
    
      Micheal Young was called back, but said no thanks Danny.  I'm not in
    the football spirit and don't want to play for you.  That was somewhat
    of a shock when they let him go a few weeks back.
    
    
      The line is 8 1/2 for the game Cacti....
    
      Will Reeves be back.  Alot of speculation going on around that...
    
    	Tim
36.1613ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Thu Dec 17 1992 14:263
    The barrel man ????......huh? What's that mean?
    
    CG
36.1614Elway to startPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 17 1992 15:2012
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc
Subject: Sports Digest
Date: 14/15/16 Dec 92

Broncos: Quarterback John Elway will play Sunday against Seattle, returning 
	after sitting out four losses with a bruised right shoulder.
	The Broncos enter the game against the Seahawks with a 7-7 record, one
	game behind the Houston Oilers for a wild-card berth. In the AFC West
	race, the Broncos are two games behind co-leaders Kansas City and San
	Diego. Elway threw approximately 150 passes Monday and said he has
	regained most of the strength in his shoulder. 
36.1615QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 17 1992 16:0015
      I saw something on the supposed last wildcard birth,
    
     and that is, if (big if) the oilers lose one of their last 2 games and
    the donks win both of theirs,  then they are in no matter what the
    other hopeful do.  This is assuming the fish and chargers win at least
    one of their remaining games.
    
      The donks win the tie breaker between indy, spots and oilers...
    
      Can the donks win both of their last?  Hard to say,  but anything is
    possible.  I don't think they will,  but what the heck, heres to hoping
    they do!!
      
    
       Tim
36.1616Hip Hip HorrayCNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway NFL Baby of the Year WinnerThu Dec 17 1992 17:532
and here's to hoping that they don't!!!

36.1617QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 17 1992 19:202
      I'm sure you are hoping they don't, 'cause they might hurt your
    stellers;^)
36.1618BBH (Big Baby Hoss) is back for MidgetsROCK::MURPHYFri Dec 18 1992 19:414
If the Giants can take out the Chiefs this weekend, they will clinch the
Broncos a spot (WHEN Denver wins the last two)

Murph
36.1619Uh-Oh..WLW::TURCOTTEThanksgiving for every wrong moveFri Dec 18 1992 19:495
    
    If youse is countin on the jints, for a clinch, youse is in worse shape
    than you know.
    
    Turk
36.1620CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Mon Dec 21 1992 15:0422
    Well I'd never thought I'd be saying this, but I'll be rooting for
    the Donks to beat the hail out of the Chiefs next week to git into
    the playoffs ( not as champeens tho, go SD!). Why you ask? Not because
    I'm suddenly enamored with the Broncos, but I'm sick of watching what
    used to be my fav team ( KC) do the Jekyll and Hyde thang.
    I don't want to see the Chiefs in the playoffs at all. No flippin'
    cojones. Take this team away from Arrowhead, and they're as timid as
    a titmouse. Go back to Clevescum Scottenheimer, you bum. What a 
    motivator. So go Donks nexted week ( and thusly soon to be banished
    from the 'offs, i hopes!).
    
    Speakin' of the Donks, another display of mediocrity. They ought to
    send a personal thank you to Warren (?) for fumbling that ball.
    And did they import the Clemson timekeeper for the end of the game?
    THREE seconds elapsing for a spike by the QB?  What a joke!   And
    then the last incompletion heave by the QB. There were THREE ticks left
    on the clock when the ball fell incomplete and the ref gave the signal.
    But presto! 3..2..1..0. Game over.  Natural Orange progression...
    Clemson to the Donks.  8^)
    
    MikeL
    
36.1621Winnin UgleeeROCK::MURPHYMon Dec 21 1992 16:4810
Same Broncs - with Elway they play 2-3 points above the competition at home, 
without they play 4-7 points below.  

re -.2 told you the jints would come through...

Mail this one in - Marty has to be having some recurring nightmares this
week, and Danny and Elway are licking their chops... Bring on the fish...
Even at home, Marty can't beat Denver...

Murph
36.1622METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 21 1992 16:544
Next weeks game is in KC?? If that is the case Broncos can kiss their playoff 
hopes good bye.

The Crazy Met
36.1623ROCK::MURPHYMon Dec 21 1992 17:453
Wanna put your p-name where your mouth is?

Murph
36.1624CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Mon Dec 21 1992 17:485
    KC will be a chokin' on that chickenbone. Denver wins this one ugly,
    but win they do.
    
    MikeL
    
36.1625DEAL! p-name bet it isMETSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 21 1992 17:554
Actually I don't give a hoot who wins, but sure I'll put a p-name
bet on this one.

The Crazy Met
36.1626Good - I have a good one set up.ROCK::MURPHYCopper Mountain here I come!!!Mon Dec 21 1992 18:248
Now that I figured out how to turn the dang thing on, I am ready
for ya.  I have a real good one ready.  Will reveal it nexted week.

Have one extra boost for the Bronco gods this week, as I will be in 
Boulder come Tues Nite.  Anyone care to comment on the ski conditions?  Be nice
to get on THE slopes (the Wachusett slush just don't turn me on.)

Murph
36.1627METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 21 1992 18:397
So what will my p-name need to be if the Broncos win. I mean we usually
set this up ahead of time.

I am ope to suggestions as to what Murph's p-name will be next week, I assume
the p-name bet is for one week. So if you have suggestions, send me mail.

The Crazy Met
36.1628Murph's p-name to beMETSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 21 1992 19:329
p-name that Murph will use for a week after the Broncos lose will
be: (courtesy of Mr. Childs).

John Elway Girly-Mon Supreme!


Week begins with the first use of the p-name in this notesfile.

The Crazy Met
36.1629Funny, I should ask about "being too big" hahahaCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeTue Dec 22 1992 01:1311
    
    Fantasy question for MikeC
    
    Will your P-Name fit in the allocated space?  Is it too big for Murph?
    
    ????????
    
    I remain,
    returning after an absense!
    Kev
    
36.1630And the winner is...ROCK::MURPHYCopper Mountain here I come!!!Tue Dec 22 1992 13:418
OK, your p-name will be...

Harry Carray is my hero!

I had some other Cubbie derivatives that seemed to be too long for this
particular forum...

Murph
36.1631METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 22 1992 14:277
Kev,

Yeah I tested the p-name and it will fit.

I remain, your tester of wierd things

The Crazy Met
36.1632METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 22 1992 14:285
Murph,

Are you a Cub's fan? Just curious.

The Crazy Met
36.1633Bleacher BumROCK::MURPHYCopper Mountain here I come!!!Tue Dec 22 1992 15:5611
This April will be the first Cub's opening day I have missed in 4 years.
Just finished studies at the U of Illinois, so I was poisoned by the masses
of Chicago folk there during my six year stay (what the hey, there was no home
team in Denver). Spent all last summer as a bum at my friends' pad at 722 W.
Addison.

So yes, I am a Cubs fan.  But then, as a stroke of fortune would have it,
I came to be employed by Digital, and moved to Boston to add an AL team to 
my portfolio - just in time for THEM to ne in last place...

Murph
36.1634METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 22 1992 16:228
So let me get this straight.

A Bronco fan whis is a Cubs fan, probably a Rockies fan, and
now a Red Sox fan as well. Hmm, you could see all 3 of your
teams in last place in the same season. A bit far fetched,
but ...

The Crazy Met
36.1635WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYTue Dec 22 1992 16:346
    
    
        C'mon Yoseff you know the Cubs will finish ahead of the Mets...:-)
    
    
    Chappy
36.1636May happen, thoughANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Tue Dec 22 1992 18:224
    As well as the Indians finishing ahead of the Yanks!  ;*)
    
    
    Spud 
36.1637QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksTue Dec 22 1992 19:265
      Will Schottenhiemer (sp?) hex himself come sunday?
    
      Will it matter?
    
      Tim
36.1638heh heh hehACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Sun Dec 27 1992 19:1110
    
    Mike Child - you owe me one!
    
    Actually I had little interest besides the p-name bet in who won the
    game. That is until I found out that I was betting my p-name against a
    CUBS fan. How sweet it is. I hope that Murph notes often during the
    next week or so.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
36.1639Derrick, Derrick!!!CNTROL::CHILDSCool Down, Stop actin' CrazyMon Dec 28 1992 11:006
 Thanks TCM. Much like the Elway/Marty curse was broken, you've broken my
 curse against the Donks.....I was happy to see KC win even more happy that
 Elway contributed 2 td's to winning effort........

 ;^)
36.1640Turned ugly quick!QUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesMon Dec 28 1992 12:1615
      The donks started out good,  but then fell apart once KC got the
    their 1st turnover.  Derrick Thomas deserves the game ball from
    Schottenhiemer.
    
      Congrats to the Cheifs and fans, if there are any in here (RONS?).
    
      The cheifs defense scored 3x and set up a 4th.
    
      The cheifs offense is suspect.  They didn't have to go far to score
    the offensive points.
    
      It shows in the post today that Denver only had 3 turnovers?  I
    thought they had more than that?
    
      Tim
36.1641METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 28 1992 12:306
Broncos had more than 3 fumbles, but only 3 turnovers - that is KC got
the ball. When the KCplayer fumbled on the 3 yard line and a 21-13 score
I thought Marty must be thinking about that 2nd Denver-Cleveland AFC
championship game.

The Crazy Met
36.1642DraftsROCK::MURPHYJohn Elway - Girly Mon Supreme!Mon Dec 28 1992 14:0116
Add one more draft to wait and worry about. Bad weekend to be Orange and Blue...
but that will change.  Look for two Orange and Blue wins this week - Illinois
and Syracuse.

If Denver doesn't draft an OL in the first round or use the free agent market
that is developing to pick one up, I quit.  Looking at Freeman, I really think
they could have been served well by trading Humphrey and a couple of picks for
an all-pro OL rather than an injured Sammie Smith.  It seems counter intuitive
to me to be building for the future the year after you almost went to the
Super Bowl... that is when you should be trying to pick up the last cog for this
year's machine instead.

Do the Pats get the number one pick?  Who do they take?  Bledsoe/Mirer?
Garrison Hearst?

Murph
36.1643METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 28 1992 14:046
Pats get first pick in the draft, Seattle second, Jets third. ESPN had
the Pats taking a non-QB, Seattle taking Mirer and the Jets taking a
non-QB. Bedloe was not listed since he is not officially in the draft.

The Crazy Met
36.1644outta hereQUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesMon Dec 28 1992 20:0919
      Just heard from a co-worker that Reeves is gone.  He heard it from
    the radio.
    
      Alot of us wanted his head and now that time has come.  BG will be
    happy once he hears.  Whats next?  I hope that they get a motivational
    coach that can draft! players that is...
    
      Any early speculation as to whom the new coach will be?
    
      Wade Phillips?  Mike Shannahan?  probably neither.  No cowaboy has
    been pleaaassssssssseeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
      Next year should be interesting.  Regardless of whom it is,  it will
    be either dismal or great, but probably no in-between (8-8) like this
    year.
    
      Are there any great coaches out there?
    
      Tim
36.1645BSS::G_MCINTOSHEarn More Sessions By SleavingMon Dec 28 1992 20:146
    
    Tim, Bill Parcells is available, but he may want more control than
    Bowlen is willing to give.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
    
36.1646METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 28 1992 20:265
Hey if Reeves were fired last season than Walsh might have been available. 
The challenge of winning a Super Bowl as coach of the Broncos might have
been too intriguing for Walsh to pass up :-)

The Crazy Met
36.1647PARVAX::WARDLE_MMon Dec 28 1992 20:289
    Well, with Reeves gone who is the horse gonna mate with? 
    
    On that note, the discussion on the FAN today was around Reeves
    becoming the new head coach of the Giants.
    
    Mike C., wouldn't you just love that? Mebbe he'll bring your buddy
    Elway with him.
    
    JoJ_NOT
36.1648ELMAGO::CGRIEGOPut your hope in God!Mon Dec 28 1992 20:406
    I think Denver screwed up! Expect the doinks to return to their pre-Dan
    Reeves form......Bucky or no Bucky.....
    
    Carloski
    
    
36.1649MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionTue Dec 29 1992 13:304
    
     If'n it weren't for Reeves, Sea Biscuit never would have thrown those
    two INTs or fumbled in the end zone. They should have drawn and quart-
    ered the bugger ! Firing's too good for him !
36.1650ReevesROCK::MURPHYJohn Elway - Girly Mon Supreme!Tue Dec 29 1992 13:489
My preDitkacion - Reeves coaches the Bears next year - to the Super Bowl.
Harbaugh makes all-pro. AFC finally wins a Super Bowl - Dolphins.

My other money is on Shanahan getting the head coach job.  Gotta make Elway
happy.

You heard it here first.

Murph
36.1651You heard it here second...FDCV06::KINGBe nice, I'm a Pheresis donor...........Tue Dec 29 1992 14:473
    Lou Holtz will be the nexted Bronco coach...
    
    REK
36.1652BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 29 1992 15:4139
    Holtz in Denver - HA!  At least it'd get him out of South Bend.  And if
    I think the Bronco haters are bad now...
    
    Well Leary, so much for your pick of Denver beating KC.  We can only
    hope you have an equal lack of success in your Cotton Bowl prediction. 
    (you're picking ND, right? :^))
    
    This offense sure looks pathetic away from Mile High.  They don't move
    the ball with *any* sort of consistency, and to top it off they hand
    the Chiefs 3 TD's.  Not to take anything away from the KC defense, but
    needless to say you're gonna almost always lose when the opposing defense 
    scores 21 points.  
    
    It isn't too hard to figure out the biggest problem of the '92 Broncos
    - when they go on the road, they're among the worst in the league.  For
    whatever reason, this team was like night and day between road and
    home.  Even a measly 4-4 road record would've given this team a bye in
    the playoffs and possibly home field throughout.  
    
    The biggest surprise about the Reeves decision to me was that it came
    so quick.  I was also surprised about the number of people who were
    upset about his firing.  It seems like I you heard and read was
    criticism of Dan, but now that he's gone they don't like the decision. 
    It was like it was fashionable to criticize Reeves, even though people
    really preferred him as the Bronco coach.  
    
    I'll be very surprised if Shanahan isn't the next Bronco coach.  Wade
    PHillips is also an obvious frontrunner, but anyone can see the
    problems this team has had in the past couple years is on offense,
    which gives Shanahan the edge.  And it was in '86-'87 when Shanahan was
    fully running the offensive show that Denver's offense was among the
    league's best.  The bad part of this is that there's a good chance that
    Phillips will follow Reeves if Reeves gets hired elsewhere.
    
    About the only other candidates being mentioned at this point are
    Dennis Erickson and Steve Spurrier.  
    
    
    Joe 
36.1653It's been real Dan... Now Git !!!QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 15:5337
    
     Gawd...  Anyone but Holtz !!!   Please !!
    
     I'm glad to see Reeves gone.  He's done alot for the Donks but his
    time has passed.  He needs to rethink his football and come out fresh.
    I would'nt be suprised to see him in HOTlanta.  He is after all from 
    there.
    
     My money is on Shanahan but I don't htink that would be the best
    decision for the Donks.  I'd love to see Parcells come to Denver
    but it would mean a few years of rebuilding to bring the team around
    to his style assuming he'd want to do that.  I'd love to see Mouse
    Davis come in with a highly modified version of the R&S.  Bill Walsh
    would be a dream coach for Elway and the Donks but that ain't gonna
    happen.
    
     I kinda feel sorry for Reeves that way things happened but I have to 
    disagree with Carloskiwitz...  The will be good for the donks in the
    long run.  
    
     Nexted year will be interesting...  The Donk's probably won't make the
    playoffs two years in a row.  It will take longer that this offseason
    to fix the problems unless Bowlen hits the road with a wide open check-
    book for the upcoming free agents.  That is doubtful because Bowlen is
    as tight fisted as Joe Robbie(Miami) ever was.  Look for the Donks to
    either finish 5 - 11 next year or 12 - 4...  From Donk land,  It will
    be interesting.
    
    My Top Five Coaching Choices for Bowlen:
    
    Bill Walsh
    Bill Parcells
    Mouse Davis
    Wade Phillips
    Mike Shanahan
    
    p.s.  Jerry and Elvis' seats will be gon from Hotlanta soon !!
36.1654CNTROL::CHILDSPete Pavia a true American HeroTue Dec 29 1992 17:1314
Let's see Elway throws 9 TD's and 17 interceptions for the year and you think
being away from home was the biggest problem Joe? Of course if you look at it
as being away from home as the biggest problem than it would support me 
contention that most of Bucky's big comebacks were with the able assistance
of the refs....

;^)

BG, I thought you told us they were going to the Superbowl? Guess what just
like the Giants they're out playing golf.........

happy trails to you....

mike
36.1655QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 18:087
    
     Mike....  I got a P-Name that syas the Donks finish better than the
    GIants next year...
    
     Joe,  I like the Dennis Ericson theroy...  He'd be great !!
    
    BG
36.1656Go Reeves......and take BigTeef wif ya!CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Tue Dec 29 1992 18:1015
    HAHAHA,
    My reverse whammy worked. Got Schottenheimer the wisenheimer out from
    underneathe the BigTeefCurse! Go Chiefs!!
    Now all I gotta do is praise the Aggies to high heaven and pick 'em by
    10!  In da bag!
    
    Lou Holtz in Denver?? Never happen. Cain ya hear po' Lou talking about
    "the best Raider team he's ever seen" TWICE during the year. Keep him
    in South Bend where he's appreciated.
    
    Add this to the Donks' short list for a coach: Rod Humenick. 
    The Patsies "gift" to the future success of the Donks...
    
    MikeL
    
36.1657METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 29 1992 18:119
Erickson just signed an extension at Miami. Sure he could leave anyway
but it just is not going to happen.

Assume that Parcells will only go back to coaching if he has real control.
Sounds like Bowlen is not willing to give a coach that kind of authority.
Also, if Parcells has a choice of going back to the Giants (may or may not)
I doubt that he will go anywhere else.

The Crazy Met
36.1658DECWET::METZGERThis space being flea bombed..Tue Dec 29 1992 18:1917
I think the away record is the true indication of the Doncs. Year after Year
they look more impressive than they are because they can pile on the wins in
the high altitude of Denver. Usually coming on strong in the 2nd half when
the opposition runs out of breath...

Put them in a stadium without that advantage and they suck....

Firing the coach isn't going to improve the team...

Look for Bowlen to hire some flunky and watch the team hit the skids...

Bowlen is another Ken Behring (Seahawks owner)..cheap, stupid and thinks he 
knows more about football than the professionals....


Metz
36.1659CNTROL::CHILDSPete Pavia a true American HeroTue Dec 29 1992 18:201
if we survive you're on BG.....
36.1660QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 18:308
    
     Ok Childs...
    
    
     Metz,  I have a feeling you might be right (about Bowlen) but I really
    hope not.  The rest of what you said is a bunch of anti-donk crap.
    
    BG
36.1661PFSVAX::JACOBTue Dec 29 1992 19:128
    Hey Big'N'Lame,
    
    I know another coach who's available(but maybe not willing)
    
    How's about the Emperor Chas. Noll??
    
    JaKe
    
36.1662not such a bad idea, consider ...METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 29 1992 19:216
Yeah JaKe, Noll might be acceptable. I mean Parcell's team whipped Denver
in the SB, Walsh's team whipped Denver in the SB. But Denver happened to
face Dallas during the Steelers glory years, so Noll never got the chance
to take a crack at Denver.

The Crazy Met
36.1663PFSVAX::JACOBTue Dec 29 1992 19:245
    The STEELERS and Denver both knocked each other off during the
    playoffs, though, many times throughout the years.
    
    JaKe
    
36.1664BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 29 1992 19:3132
Childs, I was just talking in general.  They played absolutely terrible in 
just about every road game and finished 1-7.  And you can talk about Elway's
poor stats all day - he's never had great stats and probably never will. 
That's just the type of QB he is.  As good as he can look in the last couple
minutes of a game though, he sure can look bad on occasion.  He deserves a good
portion of the blame for the loss at KC.
  
> I think the away record is the true indication of the Doncs. Year after Year
> they look more impressive than they are because they can pile on the wins in
> the high altitude of Denver. Usually coming on strong in the 2nd half when
> the opposition runs out of breath...

I don't think it's all due to the altitude, alot of it is probably just mental.
That's one area I feel a new coach will be good - hopefully whoever it is will
get this team ready to play on the road, especially in the big games.  Under
Reeves I recall Denver winning only one big game on the road in very impressive
fashion.

> Put them in a stadium without that advantage and they suck....

That was very true this season, but last year they managed to go 5-3 away from
home and they ended up with the 2nd-best record in the AFC.

RE: Erickson
I'd love to see him here too, but on the other hand I'd hate to see the Canes
lose him.  And true, he did just sign a 7-year contract, but I heard something
about it having an escape clause in it about him going to the pros.  I think
he's a longshot to come to Denver, though.


Joe
36.1665METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 29 1992 19:395
Denver won against the Brown on the road - but they needed a last minute 
drive to do that. Which big game did they win on the road in impressive fashion?
Just curious on this one.

The Crazy Met
36.1666Bowlen = Cheap?ROCK::MURPHYJohn Elway - Girly Mon Supreme!Tue Dec 29 1992 19:447
I'm not sure on this score, Metz...

I've heard some poor house Bowlen stories, but doesn't Denver have one of the
higher league salary levels? Fortunately for Bolwen supported by the team
support...

Murph
36.1667QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 20:246
    
     Murph...  Did you lose a P-Name bet ??
    
     if not you're a trator !!!
    
    BG
36.1668from the king of the p-name bettersMETSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 29 1992 20:365
BG,

read .1621-.1630 and you'll understand Murph's p-name.

The Crazy Met
36.1669BSS::JCOTANCHTue Dec 29 1992 22:0118
> Denver won against the Brown on the road - but they needed a last minute 
> drive to do that. Which big game did they win on the road in impressive fashion?
> Just curious on this one.

Last game of the '84 season, Denver goes into Seattle.  Winner gets the
division title while the loser has to play the following week in the wildcard
game.  I believe the score was 31-10, Denver.

RE: Bowlen
I'm also a little worried about him being a little cheap, and that'll
especially hurt with free agency looming on the horizon.  One of the more
interesting things that came out of the Reeves dismissal was that Dan wanted to
get certain players thru trade or whatever (Webster Slaughter and Mike
Pritchard were a couple names that came up) but Bowlen wouldn't let him because
of financial reasons.  Doesn't sound good...


Joe
36.1670PARVAX::WARDLE_MTue Dec 29 1992 23:0311
    This just in from Mike and the Mad-dog on the FAN....Donks are
    considering, among others, former Jets coach Joe "Brain Dead" Walton
    for the head coaching spot in Denver. HA HA HA HA HA...I hope they sign
    him!!!!
    
    I'll bet he could pick and shoot those boogers a couple extra feet in
    Pile-it-High Stadium.
    
    Hawwwww!!!
    
    JoJ_NOT
36.1671Overrated NY talkmastersCTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Wed Dec 30 1992 11:236
    HAHA
    Mike and the Mad Dog. You know how knowledgeable they are; they think
    Lee Corso is a great analyst. Nuff said!
    
    MikeL
    
36.1672All speculation for 1-2 more weeksQUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesWed Dec 30 1992 13:449
      JoJ_*,  Of course you only show up when the donks are out.  You
    dissapeared for what seemed like half of the season.  What happened to
    those Jesters?  I thought you said they would win the east?
    
      This nose picker "twist" is bunk!
    
      MikeL, I will have to agree with ya.....re-1
    
     Tim
36.1673PARVAX::WARDLE_MThu Dec 31 1992 22:1416
    Wait a second...Mike and the Mad Dog are truly America's sports
    authorities. Geez, they announced Handley's firing a week before the
    Giants would admit to it.
    
    They had ol' Joey Brain Dead Walton on the show today. He sounded kinda
    congested, but it could have been that finger cloggin up the works.
    Anyway, he said that he and the Donks have been in contact and he's a
    top candidate for the position.
    
    C'mon, you donkolas would love that nose picker hangin on the sidelines
    in Pile it High.
    
    Imagine how the horse would get confused with Waltons complex offensive
    scheme...he'd throw 4 INT's for every TD.
    
    JoJ_NOT
36.1674CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Jan 04 1993 11:1116
>    Wait a second...Mike and the Mad Dog are truly America's sports
>    authorities. Geez, they announced Handley's firing a week before the
>    Giants would admit to it.
    
I have to agree with JoJ on this one.  


Say, JoJ, believe it or not, the Giants actually finished with a 
better record than the Jests....  How bout that.  Remember the chat
we had after Giantsmania?????


BTW, I never knew that Mesereau was from Southern Ct State.....


'Saw
36.1675QUASER::JACKSONTAA2 brings out the hypocritesMon Jan 04 1993 12:1919
      I'm gonna lose it if the picker comes to Denver.
    
      I say either Wade Phillips or Shannahan will be coach.  At 1st I said
    Shannahan wouldn't be back,   but Bowlen doesn't care about salt in the
    wound and they DO get along!
    
      It won't matter if Bowlen doesn't give up some $$$$ for a good OLT
    and a premeir pass rusher other than Simon.  Those are the 2 key
    positions now.
    
      Maybe Jumbo Elliot and REggie White?
    
      At CB, they could use Byrd from SD.  Dump Dimry and Henderson if they
    get a good man-man CB.  Le Lo Lang should start with Braxton as Nick
    back!
    
      Tim
    
      
36.1676PARVAX::WARDLE_MMon Jan 04 1993 23:3411
    Hey Saw, 
    
    it cost me a lunch with a Giants fan at work. I thought the Jets would
    have won that game against the Dolts and the Giants and Jets would have
    finished with the same record. But then, the Jets crashed, and the
    Giants pulled one outta their butts.
    
    Oh well, at least I'm not a Donk fan. That's one thing to be happy
    about.
    
    joJ_not
36.1677QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Jan 05 1993 17:5028
    
    
    
    JoJ_NOT
    
    
     Don't tell me you're happy about being a Jests fan...  The haven't 
    won a division title since the league merger...  Lets see,  The Donks
    have won 5 in the last decade.  The jest are one of the worst teams
    in the NFL,  have been for quite some time now.  You think they were
    bad this year...  wait till next.  The Fish are strong, Luckalo will
    always be good with kelly, and the Patsies are going to be up and
    coming very soon...  Look for the flippin Jesters to sit in the cellar 
    for some time to come.
    
    
     Well,  Bowlen is running aroound telling everyone who will listen the 
    Mike Shannahan isn't a lock for the Denver job.  The press however
    thinks it all said and done and Mikey will be back slamming beers with
    Elway right after the 9er's win the bowl (yes thats a prediction).
    I gotta believe this is the case as well since Bowlen wants a yes man
    to help run the team into the ground.  I sure hope Pats doesn't do 
    something stupid like that.  I'm not saying that Mike could'nt do a
    good job and that he hasn't learned anything from his stint in LA
    and SF but it just to much buddy buddy for me.  I say bring in a fresh
    crew... Ericson would be cool !!
    
    BG
36.1678CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Jan 05 1993 18:2310
Yeah, there's been lots and lots of Jests stuff on the FAN lately.

In fact, now that Ray Handley is gone, wait for the cries of Bruce must
Go to fill the Meadowlands nexted season.

There are a bunch of rabid Jets fans calling in, and they are waiting
for the draft to see what kind of mistake gets drafted this time.....8^)


'Saw
36.1679Jests = red Sox !!QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 19:148
    
     And thats about it !!  The Jests are the perfect example of a 
    poorly managed team with no talent and a bunch of crybaby, whiney,
    jaded, Girly Mon, whimp Fans, JoJ_NOT included.  JoJ... I'll be out
    next fall,  get me some ticket to a game so I can watch the Jets
    crash and burn.
    
    BG
36.1680PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 05 1993 19:184
36.1681QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 19:305
    True...  I hate to say this but Jest = Cubs...  Jests = Nuggets
    
    and so on !!
    
    BG
36.1682PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jan 05 1993 19:411
    The Cubs have won the NL East a couple of times in the last 10 years.
36.1683QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 20:114
    
    Ok, Ok !!!  Lets see... ahhh how about  Jets = Jets
    
    BG
36.1684FRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VWed Jan 06 1993 15:062
    If it wasn't for Elway & Co., Reeves would be another Handley.  I sure
    hope Bidwill doesn't axe Bugel for this guy.
36.1685AXIS::ROBICHAUDR.I.P. JohnnyWed Jan 06 1993 15:214
    	JoJ_NOT, you may not be a Donkey fan, but I remember when JoJ
    was one...
    
    				/Don
36.1686Elway made Reeves... I think that pretty clear !QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonWed Jan 06 1993 19:1016
    
     Me too, Slasher...  When that punk from Jersey lived out here he
    was rabid about the Donks
    
    
     Mike Heiser,
    
     We don't usually agree on much but I believe you hit the nail on the 
    head with your analysis of coach Reeves performance in Denver.
    
    I remain,
    
     Pissed about the Junk Note Scandle
    
    
    	BG
36.1687PARVAX::WARDLE_MWed Jan 06 1993 22:2211
    re: /Donus and Cocka_Jack
    
    JoJ was *never* a Donks fan. And another thing, Red Sox = Rangers.
    
    Jets will rule nexted year.
    
    And Cocka_jack, if you come out here nexted fall, I'll get the seats by
    those Biker dudes that you were high-fivin when the Jets crushed the
    Fish.
    
    JoJ_not
36.1688AXIS::ROBICHAUDAnother NEW Boston Garden goneThu Jan 07 1993 15:276
    	Hey JoJ_NOT, I was kind of hoping you would save those "Harley"
    seats for me.  I kind of liked the girl with the tatoo of the skull
    and crossbones on her cheek.  She seemed sweet and wholesome.  And
    JoJ was indeed a Donkey fan when they were winning.
    
    				/Don