[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_91

Title:CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid
Notice:This file has been archived. New notes to CAM3::SPORTS.
Moderator:CAM3::WAY
Created:Fri Dec 21 1990
Last Modified:Mon Nov 01 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:290
Total number of notes:84103

35.0. "PITTSBURGH STEELERS" by ECAMV3::JACOB (Ah Sh!t, Gotta wait til nexted year) Wed Jan 02 1991 18:54

    This note will be for discussing the NOW IDLE Pittsburgh Steelers.
    
    
    JaKe
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
35.1JMHO'sCELTIK::JACOBDamn, guess I'll wait til nexted yearThu Jan 03 1991 21:2299
For those of you who haved lived since 7:59pm Sunday in an isolated chamber and
have not heard the results, the Houston Oilers ended the Steelers season with a
good old fashioned a$$ whipping, 34-14, on Sunday night in front of a national
audience.

Cody Carlson, starting in place of the injured Warren Moon, played a game that
some QB's only dream about playing.  He, and the Oiler offense, succeeded in
pounding the NFL's #1 defense for over 450 yards and a game that was only close
until Houston scored it's first TD.  In a season where the Steeler offense was
either spectacular or non-existant, I got the feeling that it would be a long
night for the Black and Gold when Tim Worley fumbled the ball away on the
Steelers first play from scrimmage.  houston converted that turnover into 7
points and the rout was on.  The game was nowhere near as close as the 34-14
final indicates.

The Steeler Defense tied the NFL record for least TD's Passing allowed in a
season, finishing with 9, but three of those came in the final game.

As for the future for the Steelers, I offer this analysis.

Offense:
Tim Worley has shown some potential in his 2 years, but he can't stay healthy
   long enough to show how he would be over the course of a season.
   Aslo, Worley seems to have only 2 kinds of plays, good and bad.  On a good
   play, he gains 3 yards, on a bad play, he gains 3 yards and fumbles the ball
   away.

Merrill Hoge will be with the Steelers for years to come.  Doesn't have blazing
   but nevertheless, is a strong running back who is durable.

Other running backs:  Warren Williams is f and, after an early season bout with
   fumblitis, was solid when replacing Worley.  Barry Foster may eventually
   unseat Worley.


At QB, Brister shows signs of being a good QB, but I still have reservations as
to whether he can get this team a Super Bowl ring.  He needs to tone sown his
excitability and show some poise.  He should also buy his mother a big screen
TV and a satelite dish so she can watch the games from home and not be shown so
damn much on TV worrying about her baby.

Tight Ends:  Mike Mularkey remains consistent.  He finds ways to get open and
   is sure-handed, dropping very few passes.

Eric Green, barring injury, will play in the pro bowl someday as the starting 
   TE, mark my words.  He is the best #1 offensive draft pick the Steelers 
   since the they  took Louie Lipps.

Offensive Line:  Played pretty good, will have to give Brister more time if the
Steelers are to make the playoffs next year.

Receivers:

Lipps had a good year but he is the only consistent receiver the Steelers have.
Derek Hill suffers from occasional bouts with lack of concentration, creating a
case of the dropsies.  The rest of the receiving corp is marginally average.


DEFENSE:

The Steeler defense finished this year ranked near the top of the NFL.  
The secondary gave up only 9 TD's via the pass this year, best in the NFL and
tying the all-time record.

Defensive Line:
The Steelers need a dominant pass rusher. Failure to pressure the QB in some
games this year contributed to losses.

Linebackers:  Not Ham and Lambert but David Little made the pro bowl.  Greg
Lloyd is a good pass rush linebacker, Bryan Hinkle still plays well.  Not much
help needed here.

Secondary:Not much help will be needed here.  The Steelers were 2nd in the NFL
this year in interceptions, trailing only the Bears.
Rod Woodson is one of the best cornerbacks in the game today.  He was beaten
only once this year for a TD and that was in the final game against Houston. 
He also made the pro bowl as a starting corner.
The rest of the secondary is also solid, save for maybe Dwayne Woodruff, who
may retire soon.  The Steelers have left Woodruff unprotected the past 2 years
in the plan B free agent list, but Woodruff continues to make the team and play
well, he had 4 interceptions this year.
David Johnson also turned in a fine year, intercepting 4 passes, and will start
for the Steelers for years to come.
   
Special Teams:

Gary Anderson remains one of the best place kickers in the game and showed no
sign this season of letting up.  He should have 3 or 4 more good years in him 
at least.

Dan Stryzinski(sp??), while not posting a top ten avg punting yardage stat
did lead the league in the number of his punts that were either fair caught
or downed inside the 20.  While not possessing a strong leg, he does kick punts
with good to excellent hang times.

Ah well, nexted season is only ~6 months away for the Steelers.

JaKe

35.2Dump Brister, sign Young (SF backup) and watch Pittsburgh fly....DECWET::METZGERIt is happening again...Thu Jan 03 1991 21:5819
I have bad feelings about Brister Jake. Some say he's the next coming of Terry
Bradshaw and only needs a few more years of experience to become a top flight
QB. Personally I think he's the next coming of Marc Wilson. He'll play well
enough to keep a starting job but will remain the weak link on an otherwise 
powerful team.

I gotta think that if PittsburgH had a decent QB this year they'd be in the 
playoffs. I can only think of a few teams that have a worse starting QB than
Brister. My short list is:

  1) Chicago
  2) San Diego

I'd even take rookies like Hodson (of NE), Rosenbaugh (pheonix 2nd year),
Gannon (minny 2nd string) over brister right now. I think the Steelers need
another QB before the rest of the team gets old waiting for Brister to mature.

Metz
35.3IMHO3D::BOYDFri Jan 04 1991 11:3416
    
    I have to agree with Metz about Brister.  The guy has potential, but he
    isn't the QB to lead this team to the Super Bowl.  His inconsistency
    and inability to stay calm under pressure doesn't help this team at
    all.
    
    My hat goes off to Houston for coming up with the big win.  Cody
    Carlson looked pretty good for being a backup QB and the team really
    rallied around him.
    
    The Steelers need help on the DL and in the wide receiver spots.  With
    good draft picks and some wheeling and dealing the Steelers will be a
    dominate team in the coming years...
    
    JB
    
35.5PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonFri Jan 04 1991 14:1341
  I agree with most of what everyone else has said.

  The Steeler's need at least 1 more good wide receiver to be teamed up 
  with Lipp's. They still need a dominate defensive lineman who can get to 
  the quarterback. I also think they can improve their offensive line. 
  Brister, while looking great at times, has also looked like a dog. The 
  Steeler's should be trying to develope another QB who can replace him.
  I've given up on Worley. He's lost his concentration and fumbled in too
  many critical situations and he's injured all the time. He should be 
  traded. The rest of the team looks real solid with possibly the best
  secondary in pro football.

  For the last 10 years, the Steeler's have drafted people I've never
  heard of. Woodson, Lipps, Green have all turned out to be winners. But
  many of the other top picks have turned out to be disaster's. I certainly
  don't know the college prospects as good as the scouts but there are
  some player's I've seen this year that I'd love to see wearing Black and 
  Gold. (I am partial to the CU Buffs). Rocket Ismail has stated that he'd 
  love to play for the Steeler's. I doubt that there's anyway for the 
  Steeler's to pick him up but he could scare the *&^% out of of opposing 
  defenses if the Steeler's can find a way. Chris Zorich really impressed me 
  in the Orange Bowl. He could be the pass rusher the Steeler's need. I'd 
  love to see the Steeler's pick up Mike Pritchard. He's not rated as high
  as many wide receiver's by the scouts so I think he may be available in 
  the 3rd or 4th round. For CU, he always made the big plays under pressure,
  he runs with the ball very well, has good hands and good speed. Use 
  him as a wide recevier and/or 3rd down specialist. There are many fullbacks
  who run better than George Hemingway but I don't think there are any better
  at blocking. He's also a very good receiver, has good speed and doesn't
  fumble(unlike Worley). He may still be available in the 7th or 8th round.
  Gerald Hudson(running back,Okla State) could be a great acquisition if
  he chooses to skip his senior year. Then there's the offensive line. I 
  thought Joe Garten would be a good pick but Zorich beat him pretty bad a 
  couple of times in the orange bowl. I think he dropped from a late first 
  round/early 2nd round to a 3rd or 4th round pick. Maybe the Steeler's could 
  develope him.

  Oh well, I quess we'll just have to wait to see how the Steeler's surprise
  us this year.

  					Keith  
35.6SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Fri Jan 04 1991 17:5042
    
    
    	Well, the Steeler's mainly did it with mirrors this year.  Here is
    a team that had the No. 1 defense but yet they never beat a team over
    .500.  So, that doesn't say to much for being No. 1 defensively.  
    Granted that in some of the games in which they lost, the offense was
    totally inept, but the fact still remains that the Steeler's managed to
    beat only the worst in the NFL.
    
    	As for Brister, I've been his biggest critic and will remain so.
    Bubby has completed 5 years in the NFL as a QB and still only shows 
    potential!  I'm sick of po-tential.  Brister reminds me more of Mark
    Malone everyday, or should I say every game.  He will never be more 
    than an average QB.
    
    	As for the offense in general, they are in pretty good shape
    although I would get rid of Worley.  The kid has some talent, but he 
    fumbles way to much and the biggest downer being a running back is to 
    be labeled a "fumbler".  Hoge is solid as an average back and I would
    like to see more of Williams and Foster next year.  As for the
    receivers, Lipps is still very solid and is capable if they would throw
    him the ball!  The real sleeper here might be this Calloway kid from 
    Michigan.  The times I saw him play, he did a good job seeing that he
    was a rookie.
    
    	As for the Defense, I'd draft the best lineman I could.  The
    Steeler's are only a lineman and a linebacker away from having an 
    excellent defense.  Of course they could use a couple of linemen, but
    they really need a good one right now.  The pass rush is non-existant
    with this current crop.
    
    	All in all this was a pretty disappointing season from where I sat.
    The Steeler's ended up 9-7(again), but couldn't beat a .500 team.
    With the division title at hand, they also couldn't rise to the top
    which is something the team of the 70's had no problem with.  The 
    defense is really the future here, and they could have a good offense
    if they would get rid of Worley and Brister.  But, knowing Noll,
    Brister will be back next year and so the Steeler's will go 9-7 once
    again.
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.73D::BOYDFri Jan 04 1991 18:2013
    
    I didn't realize that Brister has 5 years experience in the NFL.  I
    have to blame Noll for letting him hang on this long.  I admire Noll
    for his coaching abilities, but I feel he hangs onto the "only average"
    players too long.
    
    With a new QB and some dominate players in the defensively line I think
    the Steelers have the makings of a dominate team for the next decade. 
    Noll just has to show that he is willing to make the moves to get the
    team there...
    
    JB
    
35.8ECAMV3::JACOBAh Sh!t, Gotta wait til nexted yearFri Jan 04 1991 20:0218
    Brister has been a member of the Steelers for 5 years but last year was
    his first full year as a starter.  He also only played one year of
    college football.  I think his biggest problem is that he gets too
    excited and loses it.  If he can overcome that problem, he can
    conceivably lead them to bigger and better things.
    
    I also don't think that he is the biggest reason for the offensive
    flops this year.  he threw for 21 TD's and 14 ints, ended up somewhere
    around 5th in the AFC QB ratings.  
    
    I suffered thru Cliff Stoudt and Mark Malone and in no way see Brister
    as a Malone Clone.  I personally would make next year a make or break
    year for Brister if I were with the Steelers.
    
    Worley:==Walter Abercrombie/Greg Hawthorne IMHO
    
    JaKe
    
35.9also has Elway's abilty at reading defensesCHIEFF::CHILDSI could use a dramatic sting hereSun Jan 06 1991 22:526
Why couldn't the Oilers' team that supposedly showed up today have been on
the field last week?

I think Jake hit the Bubby problem right on the head TOO EMOTIONAL

mike
35.10PARVAX::WARDLEI'm a DEVILS' advocate!!!Mon Jan 07 1991 01:033
    PittsburgH lost from the Walton_Effect(tm).
    
    JoJ
35.11Year End NumbersCELTIK::JACOBWhat's a Junk Note????Wed Jan 09 1991 02:07206
           1990 Pittsburgh STEELERS Final Stats

TEAM STATS:

				STEELERS		Opponents
FIRST DOWNS			263			257
   Rushing  			93			102
   Passing			150			130
   Penalty			20			25
3RD Downs made-ATT-pct		74-187-39.6%		81-205-39.5%
4TH Downs Made-Att-Pct		4-10-40%		6-17-35.3%

TOTAL NET YARDS			4525			4115
  Avg per game			282.8			257.2
  Total plays			897			940
  Yds per play			5.0			4.4

NET YDS RUSHING			1880			1615
   Avg/game			117.5			100.9
   Total rushes			456			446
   Yds/rush			4.12			3.62

NET YDS PASSING			2645			2500
  Avg/game			165.3			156.3
  Sacked/yds lost		33-242			34-228
  Gross yards			2887			2728
  Att-comp			408-237			460-236
  Compl pct			58.1			51.3
  Had intercepted		15			24

PUNTING AVERAGE			66-37.2			64-40.9
NET PUNTING AVERAGE		34.1			33.7

PENALTIES-YARDS			110-928			89-719

FUMBLES-LOST			40-17			33-18

TOUCHDOWNS			33			26
   Rushing			11			13
   Passing			20			9
   Returns			2			4

SCORING BY QUARTER:
        	1	2	3	4	Total
STEELERS	64	71	54	103	292
Opponents	58	86	56	40	240

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING		
Player		No Rushes	Yds	Avg	Long	Td
Hoge		203		772	3.8	41+	7
Worley		109		418	3.8	38	0
W.Williams	68		389	5.7	70+	3
Foster		36		203	5.6	38	1
Brister		25		64	2.6	11 	0
Bell		5 		18	3.6	12	0
Stryzinski	3		17	5.7	9	0
Strom		4		10	2.5	10	0
Lipps		1		-5	-5.0	-5	0
Stone		2		-6	-3.0	10	0

PASSING
		Att	Compl	Yds	Pct	TD	Int	Long
Brister		387	223	2725	57.6	20	14	90
Strom		21	14	162	66.7	0	1	22

RECEIVING
		No. 	Yds	Avg	Long	Td
Lipps		50	682	13.6	37	3
Hoge		40	342	8.6	27	3
EricGreen	34	387	11.4	46	7
Mularkey	32	365	11.4	28	3
Hill		25	391	15.6	66	0
Stone		19	332	17.5	90	1
Bell		12	137	11.4	43	1
Calloway	10	124	12.4	20+	1
Worley		8	70	8.8	27	0
W.Williams	5	42	8.4	13	1
O'Shea		1	13	13.0	13	0
Foster		1	2	2	2	0

Field Goals   1-19	20-29	30-39	40-49-50+	Total
Anderson	1-1	3-3	8-8	8-11	0-2	20-25

SCORING		TdRun	TdPass	Ret	PaT	FG	Safety	Tot Pts
Anderson	-	-	-	32-32	20-25	-	92
Hoge		7	3	-	-	-	-	60
EricGreen	0	7	-	-	-	-	42
W.Williams	3	1	-	-	-	-	24
Lipps		0	3	-	-	-	-	18
Mularkey	0	3	-	-	-	-	18
Bell		0	1	-	-	-	-	6
Calloway	0	1	-	-	-	-	6
Foster		1	0	-	-	-	-	6
Johnson		-	-	1	-	-	-	6
Stone		0	1	-	-	-	-	6
Woodson		-	-	1	-	-	-	6
Stowe		-	-	-	-	-	1	2

PUNTING		No 	Yds	Avg	TchBck	In 20	Long	Blocked
Stryzinski	65	2454	37.8	5	18	51	1
Team		66	2454	37.2	5	18	51	1

PUNT RETURNS	No	FairCaught	Yds	Avg	Long	TD
Woodson		38	    8		398	10.5	52+	1
Hill		1	    0		0	0	0	0

KICKOFF RETURNS	No	Yds	Avg	Long	TD      Botched all to hell
Woodson		35	764	21.8	49	0
Stone		5	91	18.2	24	0
J.Williams	3	31	10.3	20	0
Foster		3	29	9.7	13	0	      1
Griffin		2	16	8.0	14	0
E.Green		1	16	16.0	16	0
Lipps		1	9	9.0	9	0
Olsavsky	1	0	0.0	0	0

INTERCEPTIONS	No	Yds	Avg	Long	TD
Woodson		5	67	13.4	34	0
Griffin		4	75	18.8	36	0
Woodruff	3	110	36.7	59	0
Everett		3	2	0.7	2	0
Johnson		2	60	30.0	34	1
Little		1	35	35.0	35	0
Lloyd		1	9	9.0	9	0
Willis		1	5	5.0	5	0
A.Jones		1	3	3.0	3	0
Hall		1	0	0.0	0	0
Lake		1	0	0.0	0	0

DEFENSE		Tackles-Assists
Little		63-17
Johnson		59-10
Nickerson	58-9
Lake		57-10
Woodson		54-12
Hinkle		56-7
Lloyd		55-7
G.Williams	45-4
Everett		28-7
Willis		20-9
Evans		21-5
Griffin		22-3
Woodruff	17-5
Davidson	19-1
J.Williams	13-2
Freeman		11-3
A.Jones		7-3
G.Jones		9-0
Veasey		5-4
Hall		6-0
Olsavsky	6-0
Shelton		4-0
Jenkins		3-0
Stowe		1-0

QB SACKS	No	Yds
G.Williams	6	-47
Willis		5	-25
Lloyd		4.5	-46
Davidson	3.5	-23
Evans		3	-26
Freeman		2	-14
Jenkins		2	-13
Hinkle		2	-11
Nickerson	2	-8
A.Jones		2	-4
J.Williams	1	-6
Lake		1	-5

PASSES DEFENDED
Johnson 18, Woodson 16, Lake 11, Griffin 7, Hinkle 6, Woodruff 6, Everett 5,
Evans 4, Hall 4, Little 4, Nickerson 3, Lloyd 2, G.Williams 2, J.Williams 2,
A.Jones 1, Willis 1.

OPPONENTS FUMBLES RECOVERED
Evans 3, Hinkle 2, Little 2, J.Williams 2, Freeman 1, Johnson 1, A.Jones 1,
Lake 1, Stone 1, Stowe 1, Veasy 1, Willis 1, Woodruff 1.

FORCED FUMBLES
Little 4, Everett 2, Hinkle 2, A.Jones 2, Lake 2, Nickerson 2, Olsavsky 2,
Freeman 1,Griffin 1, Hall 1, Johnson 1, G.Jones 1, Lloyd 1, Stowe 1, G.Williams
1, J.Williams 1, Woodson 1.

FUMBLES 	No.	Lost
Brister		9	3
Hoge		6	3
Worley		6	3	
Williams	5	5
Foster		2	1	
Griffin		1	1
Lipps		1	1
Blankenship	1	0
E.Green		1	0
Hill		1	0
Mularkey	1	0
Stone		1	0
Strom		1	0	
J.Williams	1	0
Woodson		1	0


There's always next year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JaKe
 
35.12IMHO3D::BOYDWed Jan 09 1991 13:2915
    After looking at the numbers, esspecially the comparison of the
    Steelers vs Opponents, I would have to say that they look better on
    paper than what they actually are..
    
    Three things that stick out in my mind..  Fumbles, Penalties and Sacks
    against opponents.   The fumbles/turnovers they could fix by teaching
    Worley how to hang on to the ball.  Penalties well there isn't much
    they can do about that... That is in the hands of the refs...  Sacks
    you have to attribute to the lack of a pass rush..  The Steelers need
    to go to a 4 down 3 up defensive line scheme to help put some more
    pressure on opposing qb's.
    
    IMHO
    
    JB
35.13Got some good laughs out of thisCELTIK::JACOBOh Whoa, the spoils of oilTue Jan 15 1991 00:32117
             CAN YOU SEE THE ROCKET IN BLACK AND GOLD
            
                            BY
                     Gene Collier

Reprinted from the Pittsburgh Press, January 13, 1991 edition, with permission.

	It looks as if it;s getting down to decision time for Rocket Ismail, so
let's look closely at the young man's options and try to think along with him. 
Don't worry, it's not exactly the mental equivalent of heavy lifting.

Does Rocket:
	A). Forego his final year of eligibility at Notre Dame, sign a 5-year
contract with a National Football League team calling for $10 million to $1$12
million, including an approximate $3 million signing bonus, accept a shoe
contract and accompanying market blitz for a reported $6 million that will make
him the Air Jordan of football and live wealthily ever after, OR:
	B). return to college football, where they'll let you take two calculus
courses at once if you're really looking for a good time.

Hmmmmmmmm.  Careful now!!!

	Heres some information on Option B.  Should the Rocket return to
college ball and, after being declared a mental patient, get hurt, he would
jeopardize something like $20 million.

Hmmmmmmm.

OK, Time's up.

	Yes, Rocket should choose "A" because his choice is between a once in a
lifetime oppurtunity (actually a once in several hundred million lifetimes 
oppurtunity) and Notre Dame, which has been there since the discovery of fire
and shows no apparent instability.
	As it happens, conventional wisdom holds that the Rocket will
choose--are you ready---"A".
	"Absolutely," said Ralph Cindrich, the local agent, "He's one of those
unique, exceptional talents, someone who has really distinguished himself.  He
has an aura that appeals to marketing companies and he's a great fan of the
Steelers."

WHOA!

	The Rocket grew up in Wilkes-Barre dreaming of running the
sophisticated trap offense of the Black and Gold??????????

Absolutely verifiable.

George Stewart, the Steelers special-team coach who held the same position at
Notre Dame will tell you.

Sang the words to the Steeler polka as a todler????

Let's not get ridiculuos.

But let's look for a minute at option "C".

C). Rocket returns to Notre Dame for another year, hoping the Steelers will
play badly enough to earn the No. 1 choice in the 1992 draft.

Uh, No.

	Time to give somebody else some options, like the people in the think 
tank at 300 Stadium Circle, like Chuck Noll himself.
        Let's think along with Chuck.  Seatbelts fastened????

Does Chuck:
     A). Content himself with the 15th choice in the draft, which will probably
net someone lit bit-of-a-reach wideout Raheem Scissorhands of Piedmont Bible
College, or:
     B). Trade the New England Patriots Louis Lipps, Tim Worley, Tichard Bell,
Greg Lloyd and the No. 1 draft choice in 1992 for the right to choose the
Rocket, who is only the most electrifying player in captivity.
     Look, Dan Rooney always said he's in the entertainment business.  Who's
more entertaining in a football uniform than Ismail?  Besides Dwight Stone, of
course.
     The residual impact of the Rocket might justify the cost.
     He'll put your team back in the national consciousness and your take from
NFL Properties will go through the sky.  I mean what's the worst thing that can
happen, you won't make the playoffs.
     Think of the focus it would bring Pittsburgh in the meantime.  You'd have
the Rocket, the sport's most compelling figure, all over the tube on draft day
saying, "Gee, it's a dream come true; there's no place I'd rather be than
Pittsburgh."

HE MIGHT EVEN COME TO MINICAMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

     I don't know, but for me, it would be a lot more interesting standing in
the Latrobe heat listening to Noll shrug off the absence of the Rocket than of,
say, Eric Green.
     I'd like to get the chance to hear Noll say, "Raghib who?  Look, I can
only concern myself with the people who are here."
     "He's missed too much already.  He can't help us."
     Then, in a late night August session between Rooney and turbo-powered
agent Marvin Skimoff, Rocket would agree to another record Steelers contract
when Rooney agrees to include in the deal several small aircraft.
     Finally, Rocket's dream date arrives.
     He trots out to receive the kickoff that will open the 1991 season and
launch the NFL into a new era.
     The Cleveland Browns, on whom the moment like many other things is lost,
squib the kick to Brian Blankenship, who falls on it at the 40.
     Rocket joins the huddle.  He splits wide right.  But the first two plays
are runs gaining 2 yards and 2 yards.
     Now it's 3rd and 6, Three Rivers Stadium at a broil.
     And it happens:
     
     The Joe Walton offense dictates that Rocket and Eric Green be replaced by
Chris Calloway and Raheem Scissorhands, who was, incredibly, still available in
the 5th round.

You know what?????

Just forget the whole thing!!!!!
JaKe



35.14Gene Collier calls it againSHALOT::MEDVIDPresident GasTue Jan 15 1991 12:253
    How funny...how true...how sad.
    
    	--dan'l
35.15Steelers great teamsNEMAIL::LEARYMTue Jan 15 1991 14:3014
    I always admired the Steelers of the 70's. Truly a great team.When
    you think of dynasties, up here in Mass,the Steelers always seemed
    to get overlooked. The Niners come up,Dolphins,Packers, and the
    Steelers are mentioned as a great team,but always as an afterthought,
    IMO. However,give me the 70's Steelers anyday; I'd stack up Bradshaw
    in the clutch vs any QB( Including Montana,and I'm an ND guy)
    
    As far as the Immaculate Reception sending the Steelers on their way,
    I recall that that only gave them a win over the Raiders. Weren't they
    pummelled in the championship game vs. Miami that year? I think the
    next year (74-75) they won the Super Bowl. 
    
    MikeL
     
35.16very articulatePNO::HEISERArmageddon AppetiteTue Jan 15 1991 14:435
    Last night's Sportsline has Rocky Bleir(sp?) as a guest.  It was
    interesting to hear him draw parallels with today's events and how it
    affects an athlete in the military.
    
    Mike
35.17Pittsburgh Dynasty 1972-1979FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Jan 15 1991 15:1028
    1972	Win the Immaculate Reception game 13-7, lose AFC title game
    		to Miami 21-17 after posting 11-3 regular season record.  
    		Miami goes on to win Super Bowl
    
    1973	Finish with 10-4 record, end up as wild card, loses playoff
    		game to Oakland 33-14.  Miami beats Oakland the next week
    		27-10 and goes on to win Super Bowl
    
    1974	10-3-1 regular season record.  Beats Buffalo 32-14, Oakland
    		24-13 and Minnesota 16-6 in New Orleans to win Super Bowl 9
    
    1975	12-2 regular season record.  Beats Baltimore 28-10 and
    		Oakland 16-10 before beating Dallas 21-17 in Miami
    
    1976	10-4 regular season record.  Beats Baltimore 40-14 before
    		losing to Oakland 24-7.  Oakland wins Super Bowl
    
    1977	9-5 regular season record.  Loses to Denver 34-21.  Denver
    		beats Oakland before losing to Dallas in Super Bowl
    
    1978	14-2 regular season record.  Beats Denver 33-10, Houston
    		34-5 and Dallas 35-31 to win Super Bowl XIII in Miami
    
    1979	12-4 regular season record.  Beats Miami 34-14, Houston
    		27-13 and Los Angeles 31-19 to win Super Bowl XIV in 
    		Pasadena.
    
    John
35.18AXIS::ROBICHAUDZamfir's Heavy Metal ClassicsTue Jan 15 1991 15:434
    	In 1976 both Franco Harris and Rocky Blier were out of the AFC
    Championship game with injuries.
    
    				/Don
35.19SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Jan 15 1991 16:1911
    
    re: '76 Steelers
    
    	Not to mention that both Harris and Blier gained over 1000 yards
    that year.  
    
    	Many believe that the '76 team was the best of em all.  The defense
    recorded the lowest points against total for a 14 game season at that 
    point with I believe 4 shutouts.  
    
    
35.20EARRTH::BROOKSAfter further review ....Tue Jan 15 1991 17:086
    re .18
    
    Uh oh ...
    
    So I guess that the '76 Championship games loss was a post facto
    Excellent Loss, right Slasher ?
35.21JMOEARRTH::BROOKSAfter further review ....Tue Jan 15 1991 17:107
    Goose, the 76 team was supposed to best of them all, but Bradshaw
    couldn't pick up the slack for the losses of Harris and Bleir right ?
    
    Maybe the D was at their most dominant (possibly the best ever to play
    the game), but I like the 79-80 Steelers better as an offensive force.
    That version of Bradshaw might have been able to beat the Raiders a few
    years earlier.
35.22SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Jan 15 1991 17:4516
    
    re: Doc
    
    	Bradshaw was hurt for part of the year and that is why Harris and
    Blier had 1000 yard years.  I'm not sure when he returned, but the
    Steeler's had a great first round game and blew away the Colts only to
    find that they had lost their backfield.  Having then to play the
    Raiders out there without a backfield of any kind, kinda put the 
    Steeler's on the ropes.  Don't forget that the Raiders and the Steelers
    at this time were probably the best two teams in football.  The
    raiders to advantage of the lack of a running game and won the game
    handily.  Had the Steeler's went in full strength, it would of been
    a better game.
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.23Defense - Defense - DefensePEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonTue Jan 15 1991 17:495
  I agree that the 76 team was the best. The way I remember it, they got off
  to a lousy start. Then Bradshaw got injured and had to sit out the next
  6 games. During those 6 games, the Steeler's had 4 shutouts.

  				Keith
35.24Standing O for Ben DreithNEMAIL::LEARYMTue Jan 15 1991 17:5215
    Don't forget that Pats had a helluva year in '76 also. Methinks
    they woulda been Supa Bowl Champs if they hadn't been Ben Dreith'ed
    in Oakland.
    
    Waddya say John H.?
    
    (GD ruffing the passer against Sugar Bear, !?!!ing Villapiano holding
     Francis!! ARRRRGH)
    
    Deep breath, ok, flashback over! 
    
    Opening Old Wounds
    
    MikeL
                                    
35.25AXIS::ROBICHAUDZamfir's Heavy Metal ClassicsTue Jan 15 1991 17:525
    	Doc, it was almost as excellent as the Lakers 1984 loss to the
    Celtics, or the Lakers 1989 loss to the Pistons, or the Lakers 1990
    loss to the Suns.
    
    				/DoEL
35.26FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Jan 15 1991 18:105
    Could have been, but I refuse to use an official's call as an excuse. 
    What happened happened, and officiating is as much a part of the game
    as injuries are.
    
    John
35.27Where's Larry Barnett?NEMAIL::LEARYMTue Jan 15 1991 18:1710
    John,
    	Did I read somewhere that Dreith was demoted from Umpire this
    year?
    
    IMO it was 14 years too late.
    
    No excuses, still recall the anger. O well
    
    MikeL
    
35.28EARRTH::BROOKSPsssst .... Elvis is dead.Tue Jan 15 1991 18:266
    Dodo - EL , I never claimed EL's for the Lakers ... of course this is
    merely a method of smokescenning that the LB Jihad loves to practice,
    so that you can claim EL's against the Pistons in 88, and the Knicks
    last year.
    
    Not to mention for the next two weeks at least - HAHAHAHHAAAA !!!!
35.29FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 292-2170Tue Jan 15 1991 18:5216
    Both Ben Dreith and Fred Wyant were moved from Referee to Line Judge
    this year.  The NFL cut back from 16 officiating crews to 15.  Tom
    White, in his second year in the NFL (the only other person I know of
    who made to Referee that quickly is Jerry Markbreit) was moved from
    Line Judge to Referee.  That was planned before the season.  Because of
    the illness (and death, in early October) of last year's Super Bowl
    Referee, Dick Jorgensen, Gerry Austin was moved from Side Judge to
    Referee.  Jim Tunney and Ben Dreith are in their 31st year of
    officiating in the NFL.
    
    Jerry Seeman will be moving from the field to the office as he takes
    over for the retiring Art McNally as Supervisor of Officials on April
    1, so there will likely be a lot of movement next year and a lot of
    older officials are likely to retire.
    
    John
35.30Steelers were under the microscopeSHALOT::MEDVIDPresident GasWed Jan 16 1991 13:4122
    I hate to clobber a lifeless equine, but I got to thinking about what
    Bob Hunt said concerning the 70's Steelers benefiting from officials'
    calls.  It has always been my opinion that just the opposite is true.
    
    Lambert was a hard hitter.  I hesitate to say "dirty player" because
    that title goes to Mike Wagner.  Anyway, anytime Lambert was remotely
    close to a late hit (i.e. it really wasn't a late hit or roughing) he
    got flagged.  And that carried over to the rest of the defense.  The
    officials were always watching the Steelers intimidating defense a
    little closer than usual.
    
    And I distinctly remember a long Franco Harris run being called back
    for...are you ready for this..."hurdling."  I don't know if any other
    runner in the history of football has been called for "hurdling."  It
    was the first and last time I ever heard it called.
    
    There were rumors back then that Rozelle didn't want the Steelers to
    win anymore super bowls because he was hungry for parity.  He wanted
    someone else to win.  That can never be proved, but if it was so, the
    Steelers overcame that too.
    
    	--dan'l
35.31Steelers got their share of breaksSHALOT::HUNTBippity Boppity BooWed Jan 16 1991 14:0633
    Harold Carmichael, the Eagles' 6'-8" wide receiver, used to get flags
    for "hurdling" all the time.   Thankfully, the NFL finally ditched that
    rule and now we see it all the time.
    
    As for the Steelers and the referees and all that ...  I simply took a
    shot at JaKe for daring to complain that the Niners get the benefit of
    the doubt.   All dynasties, Steelers and Niners included, get a fair
    share of breaks and good luck and "Dame Fortune" along the way.  
    Otherwise [drum roll please ...], they wouldn't have been dynasties. 
    Tres simple, n'est-ce pas ???
    
    I can remember two calls in the 1970s that went the Steelers' way. 
    
    One, of course, is the one we already mentioned.  The "Immaculate
    Reception" should have been ruled incomplete because the ball hit two
    offensive players in a row.  At *that* time, that was an incompleted
    pass.  It's now okay.
    
    The second occured during one of the two late-70s AFC Conference
    Championship wins over over Bum Phillip's Houston Oilers.   Houston's
    Mike Barber caught a Dan Pastorini pass in the extreme backend corner
    of the Steelers' endzone and got his tippy-toes inside the line but the
    refs blew it out of bounds.   Endless replays showed him with his feet
    just barely in bounds but to no avail since instant replay wasn't in
    force then.   The Steelers took the gift and blew the Oilers away from
    there.
    
    I'm not saying that the Steelers wouldn't have won four Supes without
    the refs' help.  They were a true dynasty in every sense of the word. 
    But don't fool yourselves into thinking that they didn't get some
    breaks in some very fortunate situations.
    
    Bob Hunt
35.32Who knows?SHALOT::MEDVIDPresident GasWed Jan 16 1991 14:2225
    Granted I look at things through black-and-gold-colored glasses, but I
    always try to be rational and objective.
    
    I have both plays Bob points to on video.  To me, both are
    inconclusive.  I watch the immaculate reception and I can't tell if the
    ball hit Frenchy or not.  You mean you can, Bob?  Then you've got a
    camera angle that even the NFL doesn't have because no one is really
    sure...not even those involved in the play.
    
    As for Barber, that was a split second call and I really don't think he
    had downright possession of the ball before he got those tippy-toes in.
    That was also the refs ruling.  He didn't have possession.  It wasn't
    that his feet weren't in.  And I think even instant replay wouldn't
    overturn the call...that's my opinion from what I've seen them call
    "inconclusive" and "conclusive".
    
    Back to the original point, I think both plays are inconclusive so it's
    just up to what we, as individuals see and think.
    
    There's obviously fodder here for two huge ratholes, so let's not get
    into it.  Those who think one way will see those plays that way and
    those who think the other will see it THAT way.  Nothing we can do
    about it.  It's over and the Steelers were champs.
    
    	--dan'l
35.33No rathole hereKUDZU::HUNTBippity Boppity BooWed Jan 16 1991 15:0721
35.34AXIS::ROBICHAUDZamfir's Heavy Metal ClassicsWed Jan 16 1991 16:079
    	You can argue about the Immaculate Reception, but in the 1979
    AFC final against the Oilers, Barber *did* score a touchdown.  Had
    there been an instant replay then it would've counted.  The score
    at the time was 21-14 and the TD would've tied up the game.  The
    Oilers kicked a field goal then the Steelers scored again making
    a 28-17 final (hardly blown out).  Can't say the Oilers would've
    won the game, but that was a touchdown.
    
    				/Don
35.35Renfro was robbedHPSRAD::SANTOSmonster is unleashed for a test runWed Jan 16 1991 16:308
/Don,
        I think the play your talking about was with Mike Renfro catching
      the ball in the corner of the endzone while he was falling. 

      Then again, maybe I don't know what I'm talking.

Chuck

35.36Damn, the memory is fadingKUDZU::HUNTBippity Boppity BooWed Jan 16 1991 16:386
    Now that you mention it, I think it was Mike Renfro and not Mike
    Barber.
    
    The play I remember, the name, well ...
    
    Bob Hunt
35.37Steelers weren't aloneEARRTH::BROOKSPsssst .... Elvis is dead.Wed Jan 16 1991 17:1311
    re .30
    
    If Franco was called for anything, it shoulda been for tip-toeing out
    of bounds like the girly mon he was .... :-)
    
    Actually I felt that the old Raiders teams got the same type of
    mistreatment from refs. Jack Tatum seldom went outside of the rules to
    knock you dizzy, but he would get flagged on his 'rep' more than
    anything else. Ditto for Skip Thomas and Sistrunk. Aktison was probably
    the only real villian in the bunch (but was still a great CB), and the
    rest of the Raiders suffered for him and Ben Davidson ....
35.38EARRTH::BROOKSPsssst .... Elvis is dead.Wed Jan 16 1991 17:198
    re .31
    
    Thanks Bob for mentioning the 78 title game. I have a bias true, but
    the refs copped out big time in Three Rivers, just like they did on the
    I.R. in '72 ...when did a close call ever go against them at home ?
    
    And I noticed that Mr Clean, Chuck Noll - never mentioned the
    Wagner cheapshot that knocked Mike Barber out of that game....
35.39EARRTH::BROOKSPsssst .... Elvis is dead.Wed Jan 16 1991 17:226
    re .35
    
    Chuck is right, it was Mike Renfro - Barber had been knocked out of the
    game earlier. The TD-that-wasn't wouldhave made it a 17-17 game.
    Instead the Oilers kicked a FG to make it 17-13, and the Steelers won
    27-13.
35.40I bleed black and white!SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Jan 16 1991 18:5759
    
    
    	Here I go again defending those darn awful men in stripes...I guess
    I just bleed black and white stripes now.
    
    	Everyone has an opinion of what happened with the I.R.  Frankly, to
    this day, no one really knows except Tatum and Fuqua.  Tatum says he
    never touched the ball, but does anyone really believe anything Tatum
    says?  Boy, Jack sure did a great Houdini after the "accident".  So,
    the only really reliable source is Fuqua.  A few years ago on the 
    anniversary of the I.R. he was supposed to come out and tell his side.
    I never did hear if he did this or not.
    
    	But seeing how everyone has an opinion on these couple of plays, 
    I'll just enter mine from a ref's perspective.  
    
    	In the case of the I.R. the ref's had to of been spread pretty 
    thin all over the field.  The Steeler's were down to their last play
    and they had to throw some sort of bomb.  Adding to the fact that some
    of the refs were positioned for the heave, Bradshaw also had to
    scramble out of the pocket thus occupying some more eyes.  When the
    ball and the two players came in contact, the refs were simply out of
    position to see what happened.  Now, in hoops, if you don't see it,
    you can't call it.  It's as simple as that.  No one really knew what
    happened except that Franco caught a deflected pass and ran it in for
    a score.  They called a conference and no one really knew what
    happened.  Believe me, I've been in a couple of those conferences and
    they are not a lot of fun.  If no one saw what happened, then you go
    with the play.  Given the confusion of a last ditch play, it's easy
    for me to see why the ref's were out of position to see the play 
    properly.
    
    	As for the Houston non-TD, I believe it was a TD.  Another split
    second judgment thing for the ref.  Again, if he felt that Renfro
    didn't quite have possession, then no TD.  If he did, then it should
    of been a TD.  Remember, that official had to look at Renfro's feet
    and his hands at the same time to see if he had possession and both
    feet inbounds.  If I remember correctly, Renfro's catch was slightly
    over the shoulder which would of made it a hard catch to see by the
    other officials.  To be honest to the ref's, if the play is viewed 
    at normal speed, it's really hard to tell.  Only after they broke the
    play down frame by frame (including pictures in SI which I own)
    could you really tell what happened.
    
    	As far as I'm concerned, the Steeler's got some breaks through the
    years and they had some go against them.  But the fact remains, that
    the good teams make the breaks and do the most given the breaks.
    
    	Given these plays, which are really a couple of the toughest to
    call, the refs I believe did the right thing based upon their judgment.
    
    	If instant reply was around, the Oilers would of been given a TD
    in that case, but given the camera angles involving the I.R., I don't
    see how they could of overruled the TD.  After 18 years, we still don't
    know what really happened!  Maybe we could resurrect the Warren
    Commission to review the evidence...where's Zapruder when you need him?
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.41AXIS::ROBICHAUDJust this beer, then one more...Wed Jan 16 1991 19:025
    	To bad HOOT ain't here.  He knows exactly what happened on the
    Immaculate Reception.  The receiver was Renfro, but I still thought
    the score was 28-17. 
    
    				/Don
35.42CELTIK::JACOBThree roses on piano, Tulips on OrganThu Jan 31 1991 18:4415
    Dwayne Woodruff, DB, has stated that he absolutely WILL NOT play for
    the Steelers next year.  Woodruff is the last Steeler with a Super Bowl
    ring from the Steelers 4th triumph.
    
    He stated that the reason he won't return to the Steelers is the fact
    that they haven't treated him well(his opinion) the last three years.
    He is reported to have contacted 3 NFL teams about the possibility of
    playing one or two more years.
    
    The Steelers have said that Woodruff will not be on the protected list
    for teh third straight year.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.43Later DwayneSHALOT::MEDVIDWhen two tribes go to war...Thu Jan 31 1991 19:201
    
35.44MularkeyCELTIK::JACOBTeenage Moody Nugent TurtlesThu Jan 31 1991 22:147
    Mike Mularkey will not be protected this year.  Mularkey underwent
    arthroscopic surgery on both of his knees and it is unknown whether he
    will play football again.  Mularkey has given his word to the Steelers
    that if he is able to play, he WILL play for the Steelers.
    
    
    JaKe
35.45STEELERS plan BCELTIK::JACOBTeenage Moody Nugent TurtlesTue Feb 05 1991 21:2420
    Richard Bell, rb; 
    Brian Blankenship, ol; 
    Gene Cullinane, c; 
    Larry Griffin, db; 
    Derek Hill, wr; 
    Bryan Hinkle, lb; 
    A.J. Jenkins, lb-de;
    Terry Long, og; 
    Mike Mularkey, te; 
    Terry O'Shea, te; 
    John Rienstra, og;
    Tyronne Stowe, lb; 
    Rick Strom, qb; 
    Keith Willis, de; 
    Dwayne Woodruff, cb.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.46Woodson signing?SHALOT::MEDVIDwild but not lostFri Mar 22 1991 12:569
    Can anyone fill me in on some happenings with Rod Woodson?  My dad
    called me the other night from Florida and had just caught the final
    words of a sports story involving the Steelers and Woodson.  Something
    about the Steelers didn't want to lose him so they signed him.
    
    My guess is that it was Woodruff and not Woodson and that the old man's
    hearing aint what it used to be.
    
    	--dan'l
35.47ECAMV3::JACOBIt's a real beauty, A Mexican CutieFri Mar 22 1991 19:2419
    Dan'l:
    
    I haven't heard anything about it lately so I'll make a couple of
    contacts tonite and see what I can drum up, but here's the poop so far
    
    Rod Woodson has had a few meetings with the Atlanta Falcons.  He is, as
    of now, a restricted free agent, meaning he can sign with any team but
    the Steelers get a chance to match the other teams offer.  Also, if he
    is signed by another team, it will cost them 2 first round draft picks
    for taking him.
    
    Woodruff was pi$$ed about the Steelers leaving him on plan B and not
    making him megabuck offers to stay and play with the Steelers.  He
    reportedly has said he WILL NOT play for the Steelers next season.
    
    More when I get more info.
    
    JaKe
    
35.48No Wood*.* signings yet, Dan'lECAMV3::JACOBHow It Got Here, I haven't a ClueTue Mar 26 1991 18:569
    Woodson still hasn't signed with anybody.  The Atlanta Falcons are
    still wining, dining, and sixty-nin....oops, talking to him.
    
    Woodruff, to ny knowledge, has not signed with anybody either.  The
    Steelers can't talk to him until after April 1st, I think being that
    he's a plan "b" free agent.
    
    JaKe
    
35.49Thanks, JaKe. Good to have connections!SHALOT::MEDVIDwe were never being boringTue Mar 26 1991 19:001
    
35.50ECAMV3::JACOBHow It Got Here, I haven't a ClueMon Apr 01 1991 22:5119
    Woodson hyas until midnight tonite to sign with another club or the
    Steelers have to negotiate a contract with him, instead of matching
    somebody else's offer.  
    
    The Steelers, unless anything happens tonite, lost 4 players in the
    Plan "B" extravaganza.  They lost Tyrone Stowe and Derek Hill to the
    Cardinals.  The fact that they are so weak at WR made me wonder why
    they left Hill unprotected.  Lipps isn't getting any younger and Hill,
    while a dissapointment so far, has only been in the league for 2 years.
    
    They also lost John Reinstra to the Brown(spot)s(tm).  Rhino is a 5
    year former #1 draft pick who has been a HUGE dissapointment(no pun
    intended).
    
    They also lost Richard Bell, RB, but I can't remember who picked him
    up.
    
    JaKe
    
35.51Greene, Woodson, and Moore...Steelers No. 1 picksSHALOT::MEDVIDNo I was not pushing that timeTue Apr 09 1991 16:5517
    Dan Rooney gave massive tight end Eric Greene an extra few thousand
    dollars bonus out of the blue several weeks ago.  Greene, who held out
    for about half the season, was a key factor in the Steelers 1990
    turnaround and he was rewarded for it.
    
    Any word on Woodson yet?  I'm sure that rumor over in the Pats topic is
    just that.  Probably some stupid commentator who saw that Pittsburgh
    was having trouble signing him and decided it would be good for the
    Pats to go after him.
    
    Saw a mock draft in the paper where the Steelers would end up getting
    Herman Moore.  Personally, I think Moore is the most talented of all
    the receivers in the draft (including Ismail) and I would jump for joy
    if he were in black and gold.  However, I think he'll go several picks
    higher than the Steeler's 15th...but who knows!!!
    
    	--dan'l
35.52Seems like a decent draft for receivers...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Apr 12 1991 16:2920
    > Saw a mock draft in the paper where the Steelers would end up getting
    > Herman Moore.  Personally, I think Moore is the most talented of all
    > the receivers in the draft (including Ismail) and I would jump for joy
    > if he were in black and gold.  However, I think he'll go several picks
    > higher than the Steeler's 15th...but who knows!!!
    
    Talented, but maybe a tad slow.  Anyone hear his 40 time in any of
    these NFL combines?  Moore seemed to me to be the prototypical tall, 
    good-hands possession receiver instead of the game-breaker type.
    First-round material, but I don't know if he'll go real high.
    
    What's the guy's name who comes from a small school in (I think)
    Texas?  He was supposedly rated just above Ismail as the best prospect
    in the country by one scouting system.  The best performance I saw by a
    receiver all year was by that Perkins kid from Tennessee against Notre
    Dame, too, but I think he was only a sophomore or freshman...
    
    glenn
    
35.53BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Fri Apr 12 1991 18:0313
>                -< Seems like a decent draft for receivers... >-
    
    More like an excellent draft for receivers.  I saw one report where
    something like 7 of the 34 top rated players are receivers.
    
>    What's the guy's name who comes from a small school in (I think)
    Texas?  

    You're probably thinking of Reggie Barrett, WR, from UTEP, or Jake
    Reed, WR, from Grambling (Isn't Grambling in Texas?).
    
    Joe
    
35.54EARRTH::BROOKSNew World Order = Business As UsualFri Apr 12 1991 18:231
    Grambling is in Louisiana, NE of New Orleans ...
35.55COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Fri Apr 12 1991 18:334
   How many of those `talented' receivers do you think will be attempted
   to turn into Cornerbacks?

   Mike JN
35.56Steelers' ChoicesSHALOT::MEDVIDNo I was not pushing that timeMon Apr 22 1991 12:1617
    Jake, got the write up from the Post-Gazette or Press about the
    Steelers' choices?  
    
    1. Huey Richardson, lb, Florida
    2. Jeff Graham, wr, Ohio State
    3. Ernie Mills, wr, Florida
    4. Adrian Cooper, te, Oklahoma
    
    Not bad if the two receivers are OK.  Dallas wanted Richardson and were
    trading down in the draft thinking he was theirs.  No one thought
    Pittsburgh would take him.  
    
    I think it was a good pick if he's any kind of a pass rusher.  That was
    the weakest part of the team...not wide receiver like everyone and
    their mother was indicating.
    
    	--dan'l
35.57CELTIK::JACOBIs a Solar Panel Lacquer-able??Mon Apr 22 1991 12:368
    Sorry Dan'l, 
    
    I'm up in Bedford Mass. for the next week, so no access to the PG or
    the Press.  I missed hearing Myron Cope's ranting and ravings on draft
    day.
    
    JaKe
    
35.58SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Apr 22 1991 15:359
    
    	Yea, I'd like to hear what the _Press_ has to say.  
    
    	Gee, I wonder if we can expect him to play before the season
    opener, or will he be another in the long line that doesn't show up 
    until mid-season?
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.59CELTIK::JACOBIs a Solar Panel Lacquer-able??Mon Apr 22 1991 15:4916
    He'll hold out, Noll will say that he can be of no use to the Steelers
    this season, he'll sign after 6 games then play from the 8th game on
    and get 14 sacks.  That's the way it goes every other year.
    
    The Steelers always seem to have problems signing their #1 and it
    always seems that when the guy does sign, it's for what he was asking
    for originally, anyway.  The Steelers have the second lowest payroll in
    the leagueand seem to want to keep it that way.
    
    Also, I look for them to have problems getting Woodson signed before
    training camp this year.  We should hear Noll say,  "Rod Who????"
    Then he'll sign after 3 or 4 games only to break his leg and sit the
    season out, or something like that.
    
    JaKe
    
35.601991 draftCELTIK::JACOBIs a Solar Panel Lacquer-able??Tue Apr 23 1991 11:2218
    Steelers Picks
    
    1 Huey Richardson    DE  Florida
    2 Jeff Graham        WR  Ohio State
    3 Ernie Mills        WR  Florida
    4 Sammy Walker       DB  Texas Tech
    4aAdrian Cooper      TE  Oklahoma
    6 leroy Thompson     RB  Penn State
    7 Andre Jones        LB  Notre Dame
    8 Dean Dingman       OG  Michigan
    9 Bruce McGonigal    TE  Virginia
    10 Ariel Solomon     OT  Colorado
    11 Efrum Thomas      DB  Alabama
    12 Jeff Brady        LB  Kentucky
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.61Looking better all the time...SHALOT::MEDVIDso much more than everythingTue Apr 23 1991 16:3522
    The Steelers surprised everyone by not taking a quality wide receiver
    in the first round...and stealing the player Dallas was eying on top
    of that.  But then they go ahead and draft the following:
    
    2 Jeff Graham        WR  Ohio State
    3 Ernie Mills        WR  Florida
    4aAdrian Cooper      TE  Oklahoma
    9 Bruce McGonigal    TE  Virginia
    
    The more I think about it, that's not too bad.  Walton experimented
    with a two tight end formation last preseason.  Everyone is complaining
    that not taking a wide receiver with the first pick will mean another
    year of Louis Lipps being double teamed.  But think about it.  If
    either of those tight ends are any good and the Steelers do go with a
    two tight end set, a defense would have to cover two receivers (one
    being Lipps) and two tight ends (one being monster Eric Green).   I
    wouldn't want to be an opposing linebacker facing that.
    
    Then again, none of that matters if Brister spends more time
    complaining than learning.
    
    	--dan'l
35.62CELTIK::JACOBWhore + Pygmy=Little F#$kerTue Apr 23 1991 19:4517
    re.61
    Dan'l
    Let us not forget that Green played quite a few plays lined up as a
    slot receiver, too, and played damned good there.  At TE, Mularkey is a
    question mark, coming off reconstruction of his knee(s).  Taking 2 TE's
    in the draft should yeild at least one new one to the team, but with
    the Steelers luck with the draft in recent years, who knows what the
    hell will happen.
    
    Now the Steelers have to settle down and sign their draft picks, not
    have holdouts like in the past.  They also have to sign Woodson NOW!!!
    
    Give him top bucks and have him ready for camp.
    
    
    JaKKe
    
35.63Steeler Draft rated a D ??CELTIK::R_QUINNTue Apr 30 1991 21:089
    After reading several good grades for the steeler draft, I read the
    sporting news from late last week and it rated the steeler draft as a
    flat out D.  I believe I have several different papers who rated the
    draft, I will see if I can't get them in here tomorrow.  Just from what
    I've read Huey Richarson is super intelligent and makes a lot of plays
    off of intellect and instinct combined but needs to add a bit more raw
    strength.  Florida had a super defense and he was a major part of it.
    
    Roy Q.
35.64Personally, I'm more excited about the two tightends.SHALOT::MEDVIDcould not hear or see for jealousyWed May 01 1991 12:3412
    RE: Huey Richardson
    
    Chuck Noll likes smart players.  And not necessarily football smart,
    but book smart.  I think that had a lot to do with picking Richardson
    first.  However, recent years have proven that the Steelers coaching
    staff has not been able to exploit a player's potential no matter how
    smart he is.
    
    Or maybe the Steelers were just thinking the fans needed one of those
    "ew" type names for the D, since the O has "Looooooooouis" Lipps.
    
    	--dan'l
35.66Men on FootballSHALOT::MEDVIDcould not hear or see for jealousyWed May 01 1991 13:227
    I like those big tightends.  Ya know, yer Oklahomo types like Keith
    Jackson.  I tink Ewic Gween of the Steelers has a nicer tight end than
    any of them, though.  It's comparable to JR's plate stacker.  Now I
    know why the Browns have trouble winning against Pittsburgh.  Bernie is
    way too distracted by Ewics fly patterns.
    
    	--blain
35.67Woodson still in Pittsburgh?SHALOT::MEDVIDthe addiction of duplicitiesWed Jun 19 1991 17:524
    Anyone know if the Steelers signed Rod Woodson or is this going to end
    up another Mike Merriweather type of deal?
    
    	--dan'l
35.68GOBUCS::COOLEYThe Pittsburgh Fan in D.C.Wed Jun 19 1991 20:234

	Mike who?

35.69The annual dragging of the feetECAMV3::JACOBDo nothing...Then Rest!!Wed Jun 19 1991 21:5910
    Dan'l
    
    The Steelers have not signed Woodson yet, nor have they made much
    progress signing draft picks.
    
    Looks like the annual Chuck Noll's, "Rod Who, Huey Who, are they
    brothers??"
    
    JaKe
    
35.70I R Back From VacationECAMV3::JACOBSince 1st I had, Worst I had Was GOOD!Mon Jul 15 1991 19:276
    The Steelers signed their #1 Pick, Hugh Richardson to a 4 year contract
    worth $2.8 million.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.71So.....ROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Tue Jul 16 1991 11:125
    
    Won't make any difference.....
    
    		Have they signed a new QB yet?
    
35.72ECAMV3::JACOBD.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothersTue Jul 16 1991 20:0412
    The Steelers still have not signed Free Agents Rod Woodson and David
    Little.
    
    Sources here in Pittsburgh for both sides say that they are making
    progress in getting Woodson signed and expect his contract to be inked
    in the next week or two.  
    
    There was no word about the status of David Little's negotiations.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.73SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Jul 17 1991 15:2513
    
    re: Jake
    
    	I wouldn't to concerned about Little.  He's been around for awhile
    now, and with their No. 1 pick slated for a inside LB spot, I wouldn't
    think Little would be a priority.  I'd be more concerned about Woodson
    since he is one of the best CB's in the league.
    
    	Other than that, it's good to see their No. 1 get signed so early.
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.74ECAMV3::JACOBD.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothersWed Jul 17 1991 18:4216
    With Little making the pro-bowl lasted year and having just come off of
    a fine season, I think the Steelers HAVE to sign him.  Richardson
    probably won't get tons of playing time this season while he learns the
    ropes.  Word around here is that the Steelers are moving Richardson to 
    an outside LB slot so he can play OLB in a 3-4 and jump up to DE in a
    4-3, like when they play the Bungholes and their wussfull no-huddle.
    
    Woodson does remain their top priority at this time, though, IMHO.
    
    Re signing Richardson already....Sure is nice to see the #1 in camp
    after only missing 4 days, versus seein the #1 miss 4+ games and
    hearing the Noll-isms about no contributions possible etc....
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.75Full camp should helpCELTIK::R_QUINNWed Jul 17 1991 21:0316
    What were the numbers on Huey.  I'm not sure but did I hear 2.6 mil
    over 4 years.  If so it doesn't sound like to much to pay if he pans
    out as a #1 round draft pick.  It is good to have him in camp.  Maybe
    the steelers would have scored touchdowns earlier in the season had
    Green been in camp after only missing four days last year.
    
    Any little tid bits of news coming out the camp thus far Jake?  How are
    the signings going for the steelers other draft picks.  In particular
    the wideouts.
    
    I know the Pirates are still holding the 1 spot in the east so thus
    they still have the headlines.  Any news would be appreciated though.
    
    JAKE -- Sorry about system time and lic. problem vms upgrade went
    arwry.
    
35.76ECAMV3::JACOBD.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothersThu Jul 18 1991 01:4927
    Chuck Noll and "Mean Joe" Greene have both blasted Aaron Jones in the
    past few days.  They say he has the talent but is just not using his
    head.  It was reported that he is still throwing his temper tantrums
    for which he was so highly penalized in his rookie year.  Jones is in
    his 4 th year and this training camp is his make or break.  If he
    doesn't get his head together fast, he'll be gone before the season
    starts.
    
    Eric Green, second year TE, lost 20+ pounds in the off season and is
    wieghing in at 265 now.  Reports from camp are that Green more
    resembles a Wide receiver coming off of the line than a tight end.
    Look for an awesome year out of Green, who not only is very fast, but
    runs excellent routes and has great hands and is also tough to bring
    down after he catches the ball.
    
    Steelers have signed a pick or two but I don't have any names.  The
    Wideouts that were drafted have yet to sign, though.  Tom Donohue needs
    to get his ass in gear and get em signed.  
    
    Louie Lipps is out right now for the next week with a cracked rib and
    will practice then while wearing a flack jacket, so the Steelers need
    to get the rookie receivers into camp PRONTO!!
    
    More news when I get it.
    
    JaKe
    
35.77Men of SteelSHALOT::MEDVIDBack to the Heavyweight JamThu Jul 18 1991 12:2611
>    Chuck Noll and "Mean Joe" Greene have both blasted Aaron Jones in the
>    past few days.  They say he has the talent but is just not using his
>    head.  It was reported that he is still throwing his temper tantrums
    
    I wish Noll would start saying the same thing about Brister.
    
    Why did Green need to lose weight?  He was awsome at 285 last season. 
    Does this mean he'll be faster?  He's certainly not stronger since
    muscle weighs more than fat.
    
    	--dan'l
35.78Black and Gold revving it upCELTIK::R_QUINNThu Jul 18 1991 17:5426
    
    RE: Jones
    
    I don't know what the deal is with steeler #1 picks at DL I don't think
    one has panned out since Mean Joe himself.  Drafting is such an unexact
    science.  There was quite an uproar, me included, when a tight from
    relative obscurity was selected #1 last year and he turns out to be a
    monster with suction cups for hands.
    
    We really need those wideouts in camp. Louis Lipps has been quite
    injury prone lately after some stellar early years.  Of couse, it could
    have come from the abuse he received in the early years.  
    
    Thanks for the info Jake keep it coming!!!
    
    -.1
    
    Buster does needs to get his butt in gear(drive not overdrive) and his
    head outta park or worse yet reverse in some instances.
    
    Can't remember where I read it over the winter but at seasons end but I
    do recall Green saying his goals for this year were to decrease his body
    fat%, work on his blocking skills, and digest more of the complex
    offense.  I hope copied that last goal.
    
    Roy L.
35.79ECAMV3::JACOBD.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMadMothersThu Jul 18 1991 20:0212
    Roy hit it on the head with Eric Green's personal reasons for losing
    wieght.
    
    Word out of camp is that Green has gone from good to great by losing
    the weight and has picked up some speed and resembles a WR more than a
    TE, but can block.
    
    Joe "Booger" Walton has said that Green is the best TE he has seen in
    his 31 years in Football, but who listens to Walton anyway??
    
    JaKe
    
35.80Dwayne Woodruff RetiresECAMV3::JACOBD.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMADDMothersFri Jul 19 1991 21:339
    Forgot to put this in here.
    
    About a week or so ago Dwayne Woodruff announced his retirement from
    the Steelers.  He had been in the NFL for ~12 years.  He holds a law
    degree and is a limited partner in a law firm here in Pittsburgh.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.81SHALOT::MEDVIDBack to the Heavyweight JamMon Jul 22 1991 10:446
    Can anyone out there post or point me to the Steelers' preseason
    schedule?
    
    Thanks.
    
    	--dan'l
35.82PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonThu Jul 25 1991 14:1626
  What's the latest news from the Steeler's training camp ?

  Have Woodson and Little signed yet ? How about their #2 and #3 draft choices,
  Graham and Mills ?

  It's good to see their #1 draft choice join the team early enough to keep
  Noll happy. How's Huey Richardson doing ?

  How about the 2 new tight ends, Cooper and McCon...? I remember watching
  Adrian Cooper play against the CU Buffs and was very impressed. He's
  got good hands, good speed and is hard to bring down. On top of that, I
  think he's a Colorado Springs native. Along with the Green monster, I
  think the Steeler's have a good chance to have the best set of tight ends 
  in pro football. And unless the Steeler's make some improvements with
  their wideouts, they'll need the best set of tight ends in football to
  be competitive.

  Since I'm also a CU Buff fan, I'm hoping free agent Gary Howe and #10 or
  #11 pick, Ariel Soloman can make the team. Howe, who looks like a fire 
  plug, played great at CU, especially rushing the passer. But the 
  big knock on him is that he may be too short(6'1") for the pros. 

  So what's up in Steeler land ?

	Colorado_Keith_who's_a_Pgh_native_but_rarely_gets_any_news_on_his_
			favorite_pro_team
35.83Mini UpdateCELTIK::JACOBD.A.M.M.=DrunksAgainstMaddMothersThu Jul 25 1991 18:4929
    Unless something happened today that I didn't hear about, Woodson,
    Little, Graham, and Mills all are still unsigned.  Mills and the
    Steelers are close, but the Steelers want 3 yrs with an option year and
    Mills agent is saying no to the option year.  The Steelers then made an
    offer without the option year but with decreased bucks.
    
    Noll came out with the annual, "they're missing too much camp and may
    not make the team" jargon yesterday.  Mills, local theory is, may not
    make the team anyway, if his performance in mini-camp is anything of
    a clue as to how he'll perform.  Graham it has been said in the papers
    here, is almost a shoe-in to make the team regardless of when he signs.
    
    The Tim Worley saga continues.  This is the year that many feel will be
    the make or break year, or the "Is Worley another Walter Abercrombie or
    Greg Hawthorne" year.  Worley, though, is having mucho problems with
    his back and has seen a couple of specialists about these problems,
    with each saying that they can find no problem.  Worley practiced
    yesterday in the morning session but sat out the afternoon session
    because his "back stiffened up"
    
    Haven't heard much ala Huey Richardson 'cept for the broken nose he got
    when he ran into someone's elbow in practice in his second or third
    session.
    
    More when it comes in,
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.84More Steeler NewsCELTIK::JACOBSwallowing Saliva causes CancerThu Jul 25 1991 23:1121
    Rumor from Steeler Camp is that Terry Long has failed the NFL steroid
    test and will be suspended from 2 weeks of training camp and the first
    four regular season games.  The Steeler offices admit that Long is in a
    local Pittsburgh hospital but have no comment on the Steroid charge.
    
    The Steelers held a 2 hour scrimmage against the Redskins lasted night.
    The result was a 19-19 tie.  The Place-kickers were the busy players in
    the scrimmage.  Gary Anderson kicked field goals of 57, 41, 38, and 29
    yards, while missing from 54 and 53 yards while another 53-yarder hit
    the crossbar and bounced back.  He also had a 43 yard attempt foiled by
    a bad snap.  Chip Lohmiller hit from 48, 46, 39, and 28 yards.
    
    Steeler Injuries:
    
    Terry Long(hamstring), Donald Evans(ribs), Louis Lipps(ribs), Tim
    Worley(back), Thomas Everett(thigh), Eric Green(back) and Huey
    Richardson(broken Nose).
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.85FDCV06::KINGIf the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!!Fri Jul 26 1991 11:034
    I had heard this morning that a Steeler tried to commit suicide last
    night.... Has any one heard this????
    
    REK
35.86The scoop on LongRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Sox Fall AgainFri Jul 26 1991 14:1116
    Piottsburgh Guard Terry Long was hospitalized Thursday and treated for
    an apparent suicide attempt.
    
    Earlier it was reported that Long had failed a steroids test
    administered by the Steelers on July 11.
    
    It was reported that Long ingested Rat Poison.  LOng, 32, a starter for
    6 1/2 seasons, faces a NFL-imposed suspension.  As a first-time
    offender, he would miss two weeks of practice and the first 4 regular
    season games.
    
    Steeler and NFL officials have declined comment.
    
    Taken without persmission from USA Today.
    
    JD
35.87ECAMV3::JACOBSwallowing saliva causes cancerFri Jul 26 1991 23:45102
(reprinted without permission from The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 26-Jul-1991)

                         LONG FAILS STEROID TEST
                  (hospitalized for swallowing rat poison)

     Steelers right guard Terry Long, who tested positive for steroids and 
faces a four game suspension, was in Allegheny General Hospital last night 
after swallowing rat poison.
     Long was admitted to AGH Wednesday night after paramedics and several
police cars were called to his residence on Sturbridge Drive in Franklin Park. 
Neighbors said the ambulance and police were at Long's home for several hours.
     "He was taken by ambulance to the hospital," said Jim Bennett, an officer
of the Franklin Park Police Dept.  "He appeared to be in relatively good
condition."
     Bennett declined to give a reason for the ambulance call or discuss Long's
ailment.
     It was not immediately clear under what circumstances Long swallowed the
rat poison, but he walked into the AGH emergency room under his own power.
     Long, who turned 32 on Sunday, will be suspended by the NFL for the first
4 games of the season because of his positive test for steroids, a substance
that enhances size and strength and has been banned by the NFL.
     Long, listed as 5 feet 11, 278 pounds, was the Steelers fourth round draft
pick in 1984.  The Steelers media guide claims he is the shortest lineman in
the NFL.  He increased his weight from 160 in high school, and was considered
the nation's strongest player at East Carolina.
     He started seven games as a rookie and has been a starter at guard since. 
But he was facing stiff competition this year from Carlton Haselrig, a
298-pounder who was the Steelers 12th round pick in 1989.
     Long on Tuesday informed several teammates of his positive test result.
     Neither the league nor the Steelers would confirm for the record that Long
had tested positive for steroids.  But the team is aware that Long was recently
notified by Dr. John Lombardo, the NFL's adviser on steroids, about his
positive test.  Long and his teammates took the NFL's mandatory steroids test
July 11 at their St. Vincent College camp in Latrobe, Pa.
     "It's a league matter," said Dan Edwards, the Steelers public relations
director.  "Dan Rooney was in communication with the league.  That's where this
stands right now.  Rooney said he would have no comment at this time."
     The only thing the Steelers would confirm last evening was that Long was
in a Pittsburgh hospital.
     Rooney, the Steelers president, visited training camp yesterday afternoon
but left without speaking with reporters.
     After the teams regular afternoon practice, Coach Chuck Noll approached
reporters, threw up his hands and said, "You guys know more than I do."  He
then walked away.
     Karen Long, an AGH spokeswoman, and not related to Terry Long, said, "I
can't give you any informaiton.  My hands are tied."
     Steve Courson, a former teammate of Long's who has admitted past steroid
use, said Long's girlfriend called him Wednesday afternoon and told him that
Long tested positive.
     "She was wondering if it was possible if he could appeal," Courson said
last night.
     Long's girlfriend, whom Courson only knows as Denise, told him that Long
tested for a high level of testosterone.  Courson told her that such appeals
have been possible in track and field, but he didn't know the procedure in the
NFL.
     Steelers center Dermontti Dawson said he and other teammates were
concerned about Long's health.
     "I just hope he's all right," Dawson said, "I don't know whats going on. 
We'll just have to wait and see.  There are a lot of unanswered questions right
now, I don't want to say too much.  We're concerned, that's basically it."
     Long, who could not be reached at the hospital for comment, has a
hamstring injury.  He was one of 10 injured Steelers who did not make the trip
to Carlisle Wednesday for a scrimmage againt the Washington Redskins.  The
injured players were free to go home Wednesday, and Long's neighbors said that
is what he did.
     He had been in and out of practices the first two weeks of camp because of
the hamstring injury, and he also missed the scrimmage agaisnt the Redskins in
Latrobe on July 17th.
     However, he was with the team this week at their training camp site.
     Greg Aiello, the NFL's director of Communications, said he had no
information on steroids tests from any player this year.  He said if a player
tests positive for steroids, the league in due time would announce it along
with the punishment mandated by the NFL's substance abuse policy.
     Under that policy, a player who tests positive for steroids in  the
preseason is suspended for 2 weeks from practice and the first four regular
season games.  He then must have a negative test before he will be allowed to
resume play.
     Should a player fail a 2nd time, he would be suspended for six games, and
a third offense draws a minimum one year suspension.
     The NFL instituted mandatory steroid testing in 1989 and 13 players were
suspended by the league that year for testing positive.  one of those was
Rollin Putzier, a Steelers defensive lineman at the time he took the test in
training camp.  Before the results were announced, Putzier had been cut by the
Steelers and signed by the 49ers, where he served his 30 day suspension.
     Three NFL players tested positive last year and were suspended for three
regular season games.  The league increased the punishment to four games this
year.
     The only other Steelers known to have tested positive for steroids ate
guard Tom Ricketts and defensive lineman Craig Veasey.  Both, however, had
positive tests at the league's combine workouts before they were drafted by the
Steelers--Ricketts in 1989, and Veasey in 1990.
     Both players explained that their positive test was the result of a
steroid based medication they took in college for an injury.  Heither was
disciplined by the league.
     Beginning in 1990, all NFL players are subject to random steroid testing
both during the season and the off-season.  Aiello said once a player has
tested positive, he most likely will be tested more frequently.



JaKe

35.88CELTIK::JACOBBeer, The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38Mon Aug 05 1991 19:1724
    The Steelers signed their #2 pick , Jeff Graham, WR, lasted week.  No
    terms available.
    
    Steelers beat the Redskins last night, 16-7.  Brister actually looked
    pretty good(I know, it's only the first pre-season game).  He had 2
    TD's called back due to penalties.
    
    Neil O'Donnell saw his first action with the
    Steelers as QB and looked pretty good.  His passing was fairly accurate
    and he showed some poise.  Strom may have problems retaining the #2
    spot.
    
    The Steelers are REAL unhappy with Tim Worley.  It was announced Friday
    that he has been moved down to 7th on the depth chart at running back. 
    He is currently sitting out with a back problem, although he has been
    examined and examined and examined and none of the Doctors can find a
    thing wrong with him.  Maybe if they did a brain scan it'll also show
    nothing.
    
    I'll put the stats in here later tonite if'n I get a chance.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.89CARROL::LEFEBVREA who a say dere ain't no Jah?Mon Aug 05 1991 19:4810
>   Steelers beat the Redskins last night, 16-7.  Brister actually looked
>   pretty good(I know, it's only the first pre-season game).  He had 2
>   TD's called back due to penalties.
    
    What was the call, ineligible mommy downfield?    
    
    How many times did they show Bubbly Blister's mum clasping her hands
    over her face during the course of the game?
    
    Mark.
35.90Bubby's MumSHALOT::MEDVIDtime is eternalMon Aug 05 1991 20:0315
    Bubby's mum is holding out this season.  Dan Rooney has done his best
    to sign her, but her agent, Alexis Carrington, is one tough cookie. 
    Apparently holding up the negotiations is a "signing" bonus...she is to
    be paid $1000 every time she is caught performing the sign of the cross
    on national TV.
    
    Chuck Noll was quoted as saying, "There's no way she can help the team
    now.  I don't even know if she'll be ready to start at all during the
    season."
    
    In the meantime, Betty White has taken her place on the roster.
    
    Hip Herp Holps.
    
    	--dan'l
35.91CELTIK::JACOBBeer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38Mon Aug 05 1991 20:139
    re.90
    
    Dan'l, got any Windex handy????  Just got iced tea all over the screen
    and keyboard!!!
    
    Good one
    
    JaKe
    
35.92Meaningless game #1 StatsCELTIK::JACOBBeer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38Mon Aug 05 1991 23:5850

               	1	2	3	4		T
Washington	0	7	0	0		7
STEELERS	0	3	3	10	       16


SCORING SUMMARY
Pitt-FG anderson 37yd
Wash-Ervins, 19 yd pass from Conklin(Lohmiller PAT)
Pitt-FG Anderson 27 yd
Pitt-Fair 34 yd pass from O'donnell(Anderson PAT)
Pitt-FG Anderson 54 yd	

TEAM STATS:

Washington					STEELERS
15			1st Downs		23
16-64			Rushes-Yds		32-122
194			Passing Yds		207
14-33-0			Comp-Att-Int		20-27-0
2-18			Sacked-Yds Lost		2-18
0-0			Fumbles-Lost		0-0
6-45			Penalties-Yds		9-61
23:02			Time Of Possession	36:58

Individual Stats:

RUSHING
Washington:Riggs 6-27, Byner 7-15, Ervins 2-13, Rutledge 1-9

STEELERS: Foster 11-51, Hoge 5-36, Thompson 5-14, W.Williams 3-12, Worley 4-10,
O'Donnell 4-(-1)

PASSING
Washington: Rypien 3-8-0-74yds, Conklin 6-9-0-89, Humphries 3-8-0-38, Rutledge
2-8-0-11.
STEELERS:Brister 11-14-0-114, O'Donnell 9-13-0-111

RECEIVING: 
Washington: Ervins 3-60, Hobbs 3-27, G.Clark 2-42, Stanley 2-31, Whisehunt
2-14, JiJohnson 1-32, Sanders 1-6.
STEELERS: Fair 3-54, Green 2-33, Calloway 2-25, Foster 2-20, Thompson 2-15,
Hoge 2-12, L.Davis 1-14, Lipps 1-12, Mularkey 1-11, McGonnigal 1-10, Worley
1-8, O'Shea 1-7, W.Williams 1-4.


JaKe


35.93SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Aug 06 1991 18:507
    
    Jake,
    
    	Any progress to report on Woodson or Little?
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.94That's for all those horrible jokesSHALOT::HUNTWho invented liquid soap and why ???Tue Aug 06 1991 18:537
35.95CELTIK::JACOBBeer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38Tue Aug 06 1991 18:5414
    I haven't heard anything about the David Little negotiating, but
    Woodson's agent said that the team made an offer at the end of lasted
    week and that he was going in with a counter offer sometime this week. 
    Haven't heard any more since then.
    
    Woodson's position is slightly stronger since the guy(can't remember
    the name) who was projected to be a back-up cornerback this year broke
    his arm in the game against the Redskins and will be out all season.
    
    
    More when it comes in
    
    JaKe
    
35.96CELTIK::JACOBBeer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38Tue Aug 06 1991 18:5712
    
  >> Nope, JaKe's woodson is still very little.
   
  >> Bob Hunt
    
    Only at rest.  The Mrs. tends to use "two-hander" when refering to it,
    though(and that's not meaning one for the tweezers and the otherhand
    for the magnifying glass either!!)
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.97Game time this Saturday...SHALOT::MEDVIDtime is eternalWed Aug 07 1991 13:537
    Can someone please confirm the start time of the Steelers Vikings game
    this Saturday.  My Steelers schedule says 9:00 PM.  Note 5.440 ('91
    Pre-Season) says it is at 7:00 PM.
    
    Thanks.
    
    	--dan'l
35.98Go Steelers!SHALOT::MEDVIDtime is eternalWed Aug 07 1991 14:004
    Never mind. It seems 5.440 are Montain Time postings.  Game's at 
    9:00 EST. (Why so late?)
    
    	--dan'l
35.99CELTIK::JACOBI LUV CATS-they taste like chickenWed Aug 07 1991 19:128
    dan'l
    
    could be cause they're playing in Minnie-soda and it'll be and 8
    o'clokk start there.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.100CELTIK::JACOBNOW OPEN, JaKe's Deep Fried CathouseTue Aug 13 1991 11:5012
    The Steelers signed Ernie Mills, their 3rd round draft pick, to a 2
    year contract with a third year option, for a reported $840,000.
    
    he is the last of the Steeler draft picks to sign.
    
    Chuck Noll, being true to form, has stated that his late signing has
    left him no chance to make the team, so I expect a pro-bosl year out of
    Mills.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.101Vikes game summaryCELTIK::R_QUINNWed Aug 14 1991 14:077
    
    Jake,
    
    Do you have a game summary or synopsis for the Vikes game.  Of course
    that one didn't make the tube in Atlanta.
    
    Roy L.
35.102Not much, but this may helpCELTIK::JACOBJaKe's Deep Fried Cat HouseWed Aug 14 1991 14:2018
    Roy, 
    
    Unfortunately, I was out with the wife and munchkins all day and part
    of Saturday night.  Can't find the Sunday paper, either for the stats.
    
    I will say this much though.  Neil O'Donnell is breathing down
    Brister's back.  The Steelers receivers dropped 8, count em, 8 passes
    in Sat's game.  2 of those passes would have been sure TD's.
    
    Both QB's performed good in the game, but turnoveritis in the first
    half left them behind 27-3 at the half.
    
    I'll see if I can find the newspaper and get some of the stats or a
    synopsis for ya.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.103CARROL::LEFEBVREKnows his way around a G stringWed Aug 14 1991 14:285
    Question for Steeler fans....
    
    If Bubbly Blister (tm) is benched, will his mother ground him?
    
    Mark.
35.104Mama Blister to start in Pittsburgh!ROULET::LAFOUNTAINEThu Aug 15 1991 02:443
    They plan on bringing in mama blister as backup. She is the one who
    taught Booby everything he knows.
    
35.105CELTIK::JACOBBudweiser, Breakfast of ChampionsThu Aug 15 1991 15:589
    The Steelers announced that, barring injury, Ernie Mills, WR and 3rd
    round draft pick will get a lot of playing time this week.  Mills just
    joined the Steelers after holding out and I guess this is their way of
    giving him all possible chances of making the team, which, being true
    to form, Chas. Noll has given Mills no chance of.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.106CELTIK::JACOBWhatever happened to Honeysuckle Divine??Thu Aug 15 1991 19:206
    Tim Worley is out for the rest of the pre-season.  Arthroscopic surgery
    yesterday, wonder whether it was on a knee or his BIG HAID!!!!!!
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.107ROULET::LAFOUNTAINEFri Aug 16 1991 03:136
    Is it really safe to say that Ernie Mills is getting a chance to make
    the team? Who is going to be throwing the ball to him. The starting 
    QB?............I don't think thats a fair chance to make the team.
    Maybe they should really try Boobies mom out!
    			The Rookie
                                  
35.108CNTROL::CHILDSthataboy George, screw those unemployedFri Aug 16 1991 12:1013
 You guys keep picking on Bubby go ahead...you'll eat your words soon
 enough. He now has Green to open up the field for both him and Lipps.
 He's had a year experience with the offensive system so he'll make
 better reads this year.

 Considering he threw 20 TD's to Elway's 15 and Bernice's 10 and less 
 interceptions than the two of them you guys are standing on shaky
 ground that's about to turn into an earthquake...

 BubbleHaid to lead the Steelers to the Bowl this year....

 mike
35.109GOBUCS::COOLEYThe Pittsburgh Fan in D.C.Fri Aug 16 1991 13:049
>> BubbleHaid to lead the Steelers to the Bowl this year....

Have to agree.  The Bubster looks pretty confident so far this year.  Last
year at this time he was a mess.

Any more news on Woodson?

Warren
35.110Got the sticks in your car? SNDCSL::HAUSRATHToo many projects, not enough timeFri Aug 16 1991 13:067
    
    Just remember who one of Clevelands 3 wins was against last year, Mike.
    Bubby took some real nice shots in that one too..  
    
    Anyhow, usual wager on this years games?
    
    /Jeff
35.111of course...CNTROL::CHILDSthataboy George, screw those unemployedFri Aug 16 1991 14:030
35.112Trying to cause a stir on Friday, AeeeeROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Fri Aug 16 1991 14:277
    
    	Oh come on Mike, what plane did you get off on?  The wrong one for
    sure!  Someone like Bubble Butt Baby Boy Buster Brown will never go 
    anywhere in the NFL!
    
    	Dirty Dawg
    
35.113Bubby Delivers!ACESMK::MEDVIDMerrimack: homme away from homeFri Aug 16 1991 15:114
    Bubby looks real accurate in the Dominos Pizza commercial.  Hits that
    phone right between the numbers!
    
    	--dan'l
35.114BSS::JCOTANCHLarry, Curly, and ModellFri Aug 16 1991 15:582
    With Bernie and Bubby throwing in that commercial you know they must've
    gotten the wrong number.   :^)
35.115Took longer than 30 minutes for sureACESMK::MEDVIDMerrimack: homme away from homeFri Aug 16 1991 16:3310
    Actually, they had to film the commercial several hundred times because
    each time it was Kosar's turn to throw, he kept dialing 
    
    	1-900-HOT-GUYS
    
    Meanwhile, Bubby kept hitting the numbers for his home in Louisiana
    because he wanted to tell his mum all about the commercial.  Little did
    he know, she was in the studio watching from the rafters.  
    
    	--dan'l
35.116ah your mother wears army boots..CNTROL::CHILDSthataboy George, screw those unemployedFri Aug 16 1991 16:348
>    With Bernie and Bubby throwing in that commercial you know they must've
>    gotten the wrong number.   :^)

 Atleast they were good enough to make the commercial. Smellway got AXED
 when he ask for operator's assistance....

 mike
35.117NOW THATS SOME RECORDEAYV01::ATHOMSONSat Aug 17 1991 04:4110
    Guess what the Squeelers have lost six straight to the mighty Bengals
    now thats some record,i suppose it will be eight after this season
    just thought i would remind you squeeler fans that the Boomer and
    the boys like to kick ass at Three Rivers.
    
    
          Scotlands NO1 Bengal Fan saying 
              
           Have a nice day no offense meant
               Get the joke no offense HA HA
35.118Bubbles a QB?ROULET::LAFOUNTAINESat Aug 17 1991 10:4111
    Mike,
    
        I'll give you credit on the TD throws. Beating Bernie and mom is
    really not a challenge. I see Bubbles and Boobie in the same league.
    I'm not a Denver fan but I will stand up for Elway. Elway has brought
    the Broncos to 3 or 4 superbowls, Last year he threw 5 less TD's but
    ran in 3 TD's to Bubbles "0".  Also had 2 + 300 yd games to bubbles 1.
    If Pittsburgh makes it to the big one it will be on the back of a great
    defense and not on the arm of a Junoir QB.
    
    					The Rookie
35.119exROULET::LAFOUNTAINESat Aug 17 1991 10:558
    I've got to correct myself before you big Browns and Steeler fans
    hammer me. I confused Bubbles mom with boobies mom. See, my mistake 
    was that we can tell the differences in their moms. I shouldn't confuse
    their sons with them. My apoligies to the moms.
    
    
    
    The Rookie
35.12011887::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Aug 20 1991 11:4516
    The Bengals - Steelers series has been just as even as the Bengals -
    Browns series if not more so.  After the 1989 season, the Steelers led
    the series 20-19 with 765 pts to Cincinnati's 741.  There have been 9
    splits, 6 Pittsburgh sweeps (including the one game played in 1982) and
    5 Cincinnati sweeps.  This series has been a lot more streaky than the
    Browns - Bengals series.  Pittsburgh won 9 of 12 during its Super Bowl
    years of 1974-79.  Cincinnati has won 8 of the last 11, winning the 4
    games in 88 and 89, after Pittsburgh had won 3 straight and the Bengals
    had won 4 straight.  Again, this is through 1989 only since I don't
    have this year's record book yet.
    
    In case any of you Pittsburgh or Cleveland fans ask, Cleveland has
    dominated the bulk of the series having gone 48-32 against Pittsburgh
    through 1989.
    
    John
35.121Game summary and Steeler NewsCELTIK::JACOBWhere's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days?Tue Aug 20 1991 14:5681
Pre-season Game #3

			1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS		3	0	17	0		20
Philadelphia		7	7	0	7		21


Scoring Summary:
Phil--C.Williams 4yd pass from Cunningham(Ruzek PAT)
PGH---FG Anderson 36yd
Phil--Cunningham 1 yd run(Ruzek PAT)
PGH---Calloway 15yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
PGH---Cooper 9yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
PGH---Anderson 27 yd FG
Phil--Sanders 1 yd run(Piocki PAT)

TEAM STATISTICS:

STEELERS						Eagles
15			1st downs			16
23-139			rushes-yds			27-55
108			passing yds			151
17-33-3			comp-att-int			17-26-2
4-35			sacked-yds lost			2-17
4-31			punting				6-38
2-1			fumbles-lost			2-1
9-95			penalties-yds			8-50
31:23			Time of possession		28:37

INDIVIDUAL STATS:

RUSHING:
STEELERS:  Foster 12-94, Hoge 6-25, Stone 1-17, Thompson 3-3, O'Donnell 1-0
Eagles:    Drummond 9-27, Cunningham 4-12, Sherman 5-8, McPherson 1-5, Sanders
7-5, Goebel 1-(-2).

PASSING:
STEELERS: Brister 6-14-2-25, O'Donnell 11-19-1-118
Eagles:   Cunningham 11-14-1-107, McPherson 2-4-1-13, Goebel 4-8-0-48.

RECEIVING:
STEELERS:  Thompson 4-34, Lipps 2-22, Foster 2-19, Cooper 2-13, Calloway 1-15,
McGonnigal 1-11, Mills 1-7, W.Williams 1-5, O'Shea 1-5, Hoge 1-(-1).
Eagles:    Byars 3-37, C.Williams 3-35, Sanders 3-23, Keith Jackson 3-19,
Harris 2-17, Drummond 2-16, Shuler 1-21.


THEY'RE BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!!OH NO!!!!!NO "O" JOE IS HERE AGAIN!!!!!

Bubby Brister and the 1st string offense have played the first half of each of
3 pre-season games and they have yet to produce a TD that wasn't negated(2),
dropped(1), or caught inches out of bounds(1).
    The Steelers have scored 6 offensive TD's so far this pre-season.  Of those
6, Neil O'donnell has thrown for 5TD's and directed the drive for the other TD.
    Brister has played the first half of each game and has only produced 9
points.
     If Barry Foster doesn't get the start at running back on opening day,
better call Frank Drebbin and Police Squad to investigate, casue the job will
have been stolen from him.  Foster had runs of 32, 29, and 20 yards en route to
his 12 carry, 94 yard performance.  Add in his 2 catches for 19 yards and
Foster had 113 yards in 14 plays, compared to 134 yards on 46 plays for
everyone else.
    Rookie cornerback finally showed the from that made the Steelers trade up
in the draft to get him, intercepting a Don McPherson pass to set up[ a TD,
only to suffer a sprained knee when McPherson tackled him late, when he was
already down and out of bounds. Walker was the only new injury.  Hardy
Nickerson made the trip but didn't play(hip pointer).  15 other players didn't
make the trip.  These were Delton Hall, Tim Worley, Gary Jones, A.J.Jenkins,
Dean Dingham and Rich Drayton, all out after some sort of surgery or another.
Six others nursing minor injuries were Tunch Ilkin(hamstring), Eric Green(lower
leg), Greg Lloyd(ribs), Rick Strom(ribs), Jeff Graham(thigh), and Ricky
Byrd(foot).  Rod Woodson and David Little are still unsigned and Terry Long is
not in camp after attempting suicide.
     Negotiations for Woodwon are not progressing well at all.  Both sides
agree that they are not close on either length of contract or dollars.  The
Steelers remain about $375,000 apart on a 3-year deal offered Little, who has
been offered $2million.   


JaKe

35.122Barry Foster Rookie of the Year?ROULET::LAFOUNTAINEWed Aug 21 1991 03:0813
    Barry Foster had some good looking stats the last game. Do you know
    what his other stats looked like? I'm not fond off Bubby but I do like
    the backfield and the "D" of Pittsburgh. If they can get a great
    running game establioshed and the defense play like last year they
    I think they'll take the Central Division. Yes Hal, Over the Browns. 
    10 wins for the Browns will be really stretching it but they will
    improve from last years record if they stay healthy. Belinchick knows
    how to play a defense to stop teams. The only thing is that Pittsburgh 
    can boast the best "D" in the NFL last year and should stay in the top
    5. Let me hear from steeler headquarter on whether Barry will start or
    not.
    		The Rookie
    
35.123Some info for ya, RookieSHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsWed Aug 21 1991 11:5220
>                     -< Barry Foster Rookie of the Year? >-

    Nope, this is his second year.  He is best remembered last year for
    treating a kickoff like a punt against SF and giving the 49er's a TD.
    
>    The only thing is that Pittsburgh 
>    can boast the best "D" in the NFL last year and should stay in the top
>    5. 
    
    Not a chance without Woodson and Little.
    
    >Let me hear from steeler headquarter on whether Barry will start or
>    not.
    
    I too think Barry Foster should be a starter, but Noll has an affinity
    for Warren Williams.  Williams is a complete running back whereas
    Foster is not that good a blocker.  If Foster can improve this aspect
    of his game, he will no doubt start.
    
    	--dan'l
35.124where to watch 'emHBAHBA::HAASSaint Frank and the Magic CowWed Aug 21 1991 13:346
Dan'l

You may have mentioned this before, but where do you guys meet to watch
the SteelHeadburghers? Is the public invited?

TTom
35.125SRO (for now)SHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsWed Aug 21 1991 13:5314
    TTom,
    
    We moved the club this year to SRO (Standing Room Only) Pub and Deli. 
    It's in Tyvola Place Mall in between the Bi-Lo and Target stores.
    
    I'm not real confident about this move, though, as I don't think this
    guy has a top-o-the-line satalite system and package.  For instance, we
    weren't able to pick up the feed out of Minessota a few weeks ago.  I
    think we'll be OK for the regular season but I'm still worried.
    
    And sure, the public is invited and we really don't care what team you
    root for as long as you have fun.  
    
    	--dan'l
35.126what about PicassoHBAHBA::HAASSaint Frank and the Magic CowWed Aug 21 1991 15:376
Thanks.

Didn't one of the Picasso's do this last year? I know the one at
Providence Square does the Brown's games.

TTom
35.127CELTIK::JACOBWhere's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days?Wed Aug 21 1991 19:0313
    Steeler's roster is down to 60 now.  They waived a bunch of free agents
    and no names, but also waived center Chuck Lanza, DE A.J.Jenkins, 7th
    round draft pick Andre Jones.
    
    Jenkins, plus free agents Ricky Byrd and Rich Drayton were waived after
    reaching injury settlements.
    
    QB Sam Mannery, free agent out of California, was retained and as of
    right now is the third string QB, since Rick Strom aggravated his rib
    injury Monday during practice.
    
    JaKe
    
35.128Picasso's went bustSHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsWed Aug 21 1991 20:198
    Steelers club was at Picasso's Providence Square lasted year but we
    left because:
    
    	- It was too small
    	- It went out of business
    	- The owner of SRO is from Pittsburgh (well, WV)
    
    
35.129OPUS3::JACOBDrive 2 show, Put Out the DoughThu Aug 22 1991 00:4739
    Once again, the Steeler first string offense is showing signs of
    altzheimers(sp?).  They have forgotten where the end zone is.  Now I
    know it's only pre-season, and there's one more game that doesn't
    count, but the 1st string looks like sh!t!!!!  The second string
    offense has far outclassed, outplayed, and outscored the 1st string,
    even if they have played against other second stringers.  Neil
    O'Donnell has shown lots of poise and touch at QB, also.  Brister has
    put up numbers that most QB's would be ashamed of for one game, and his
    are for 3(halves).
    
    Hers is a summary of 1st half(1st string) vs. 2nd half(2nd string), so
    far
    
    	Category		1st half	2nd half
    Points			9		51
    First Downs			18		42
    Yards			312		577
    3rd Down Conv		3-16		8-18
    Turnovers			5		4
    Penalty Yds			131		75
    
    Brister vs O'Donnell is as follows
    
    		Compl-Att-Int	Total Yds	TD	Scoring drives	Rating
    
    Brister	   23-43-4	   182		0		0	25.6
    
    O'Donnell	   34-53-3	   403		5		6	94.8
    
    
    O'Donnell is looking like he may be the person to unseat Brister for
    the #1 QB slot.  Now I DO remember Cliff Stoudt and Mark Malone so I
    won't get my hopes too high, but maybe Emperor Noll, when Brister is
    having one of those 3-23 games, won't hesitate to yank him and give
    Neil his chance.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.130CAM::WAYMighty Mouse kicks buttThu Aug 22 1991 10:364
It's nice to see that people can be realistic about their teams.
It's a refreshing change from *some* topics in here ;^)

'Saw
35.131 THE RETURN TO HELL - Pittsburg theme '91STRATA::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Thu Aug 22 1991 11:3617
    
    	Hey Saw!  
    			What are you talking about?  I'm realistic.  The
    Browns have put up some good numbers this preseason so far.  So there!
    
    	Jake,
    		It is pretty much normal for the the 2nd string QB to
    throw the ball more.  Lets face it, the coach wants to see what he
    can do.  The same goes for Cleveland.  The Browns have to deciede who
    will be the backup, Frances or Pillcox.  Pillcox took the lead because
    he came through in the pressure situation.  I think your right about
    giving the guy the chance though.  The first sign of Bubble Butt
    Burning Bald Bone Baby Buster Brown crying for Mom, he should be taken
    out and sent to his room.
    
    	Dawg Gone
    
35.132I'll stick with BristerSHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsThu Aug 22 1991 13:2223
>    		It is pretty much normal for the the 2nd string QB to
>    throw the ball more.  Lets face it, the coach wants to see what he
>    can do.  

    In this case, however, it is not normal.  The Steelers second-string
    QB, Rick Strom, continues to re-injure his ribcage muscle pull.  There
    really isn't much competition for the second string job now.

    Brister is still the man and it would be very premature for anyone to
    assume Neil O'Donnell will take a snap this season unless Brister gets
    hurt.  

    Noll is set in his ways.  Unfortunately, so are Pittsburgh fans.  When
    Stoudt stunk they called for Malone; when Malone was maligned they
    called for Brister.   I can almost hear the calls into Myron Cope's
    sportstalk:

    	"Yeah, Mahrn, yeah I thinkis Nick MacDonald guy should start
    	 at QB this year.  Yunz thinkina same thing?"

    Insert sounds of Myron going absolutely bonkers.  Yoy!

    	--dan'l
35.133CELTIK::JACOBWhere's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days?Thu Aug 22 1991 18:4520
    
    >>I can almost hear the calls into Myron Cope's
    >>sportstalk:

    >>	"Yeah, Mahrn, yeah I thinkis Nick MacDonald guy should start
    >>	 at QB this year.  Yunz thinkina same thing?"

    >>Insert sounds of Myron going absolutely bonkers.  Yoy!

    >>	--dan'l           
    
    OK Dan'l, are you getting WTAE down there now or did you hear my call
    when you were in Pgh?????  I didn't think you'd get wind of my call but
    you put it in here word for word!!!!
    
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
35.134CAM::WAYMighty Mouse kicks buttThu Aug 22 1991 18:477
Damn, if that don't sound Pennsylvania though.

Funny thing is that out there the women sound the same way....

(used to date a girl from PA)....

'Saw
35.135Woodson Signs!!!SHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsFri Aug 23 1991 12:299
    Rod Woodson signed a contract last night.  The report I heard said he
    was now the highest paid defensive player in the NFL...and he's worth
    it.
    
    The Steelers will still be lacking at ILB.  David Little will be hard
    to replace and I would think the money they are going to pay Woodson
    might hurt Little's chances at getting the hefty sum he wants.
    
    	--dan'l
35.136CNTROL::CHILDSI want a job like Randy West'sFri Aug 23 1991 14:156
 I don't think so Dan-l. He gets 1.3 million. I believe LT, Reggie White and
 a few others make more than that. He's probably the highest paid secondary
 player in the league though...

 mike
35.137The LockerroomSHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsMon Aug 26 1991 15:489
    TTom (and others in Charlotte wondering where to watch the Steelers):
    
    We've bagged SRO as of Friday since he couldn't pull in the game. 
    Obviously not the place to watch the Steelers.  We are now
    unnofficially headquartered at The Lockerroom (next to Lizzie's, across
    from the Embassy Suites on 49).  This is where we shoulda been all
    along, black and gold from top to bottom.
    
    	--dan'l
35.138Bubby's Backup BootedSHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsMon Aug 26 1991 17:3614
    Just got word from up Pittsburgh way that the Steelers cut last year's
    second string QB Rick Strom who injured himself before the first
    pre-season game.  In his place, they kept a kid (don't know his name)
    who rewrote the record books last year at California University of
    Pennsylvania.
    
    This makes second-year QB Neil O'Donnell Brister's backup.
    
    My question is: Strom was an adequate QB who showed flashes of talent
    when he got in the games last year;  why cut him, why not put him on IR
    for the year?  I don't think the rookie even got into a preseason game,
    did he?
    
    	--dan'l
35.139OPUS3::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Mon Aug 26 1991 19:046
    The Steelers cut the 3rd string QB today, too.  Also cut TE Terry
    O'Shea.  Can't remember the others that got cut.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.140If Brister AND O'Donnell get hurt then what?SHALOT::MEDVIDso drowned you were angelsMon Aug 26 1991 19:1414
    
>    The Steelers cut the 3rd string QB today, too.  
    
    Probably so they could keep all those running backs.  Not a bad move. 
    Question is, can one of those RB or one of the WR be listed as 3rd
    string QB?
    
    >Also cut TE Terry O'Shea.  
    
    Was that the rookie from Virginia?  He cut himself by getting a case of
    the dropsies Friday night.  Glad to see Mike Mularky make the squad. 
    He's a valuable vet.
    
    	--dan'l (member ovat ah Nick Macdonald guy fanclub, yenz know?)
35.141Last year Dallas cut all there kickers on this dayHPSRAD::SANTOSThe return of Doomsday in BIG DMon Aug 26 1991 19:2313
>>>               -< If Brister AND O'Donnell get hurt then what? >-

  Dan'l,

        A lot of teams drop there 3rd string QB's on this day. Most will
        bring them back tomorrow. You see, if you place a guy on the IR
        today hes has to be on the IR for the WHOLE season. Tomorrow most
        teams will move players to the IR where they can stay there for
        only 6 weeks and bring back quite a few of the backup players.
        Once the real season start injuries usually solve this over load
        in players.

  Chuck
35.142Game Summary later toniteCELTIK::JACOBWhere's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days?Mon Aug 26 1991 19:2913
    -dan'l
    
    O'Shea has been with the Steelers at least since last spring, but 
    they cut him lasted year also and then brought him back when Mularkey
    lost his knees.
    
    Re Mularkey, there was a story in one of the Pgh rags a week or so ago
    about Mularkey and his knees are shaky at best.  He is only able to
    practice one day a week, and says his knees are *SORE* after that, but
    he's still able to do the job on game day.
    
    JaKe
    
35.143CELTIK::JACOBWhere's Honeysuckle Divine dese Days?Mon Aug 26 1991 21:1924
    Announced Steeler moves as of 18:00 today,
    
    Waived:
        Rick Strom, QB
        Terry O'Shea, TE
        Efrom Thomas, Safety
        Ariel Solomon, Tackle
    
    Released:
    	Cornell Berbich, WR
    	Sam Mannery, QB
    	Gary Howe, NT
    	Kevin Smith, Safety
    	Ron Fair, WR
    
    The Steelers are expected to announce the rest of their moves tomorrow
    morning.
    
    Also, I have misplaced my paper from Saturday and DO NOT have the game
    summary from the Steelers drubbing of the Detroit Lions.  If anybody
    has the game summary and stats would you please enter it in here.  
    
    JaKe
    
35.144A reprieve from Bengal fansEMDS::UCCOOPTue Aug 27 1991 21:4114
    I MUST know where I can go in the greater Boston area to see the
    Steelers play on TV. I MUST know. The ten minute ticker just ain't
    gonna cut it.
    
                                    Ed the coop
                                    Whose_parents_are_from_Pittsburgh_but
                                    who_moved_to_Ohio_and_whose_son_(me)_
                                    goes_to_the_University_of_Cincinnati_
                                    and_has_to_put_up_with_BUNGLE_fans_all_
                                    year_and_who_is_transplanted_to_Maynard
                                    _for_the_summer_but_is_nevertheless_
                                    a_died_in_the_wool_STEELER_fan!
    
    
35.145Mike MularkeyCELTIK::JACOBHoneysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong ballsTue Aug 27 1991 23:4654
Reprinted from the Pittsburgh Press, 8-26-1991, without permission

MULARKEY RUNNING FROM PAIN OF INJURIES
                       by Steve Hubbard

     Humans have performed phenomenal feats in times of terror, and that might 
as good an explanation as any for Mike Mularkey's sudden surge of fleet feet and
pain-free knees.
     "Running scared," a rejuvenated Mularkey said Friday night after his 25
and 23 yard catches set up the Steeler's first ten points in their pre-season
finale, a 16-3 victory against the Detroit Lions.  Mularkey appeared quicker
and faster than he had in months, reassuring not only himself but his coaches
that he can be an important part of their offense for another year.
     Mularkey, 29, did not want to retire, but his balky knees, particularly
his right one, had forced him to miss a lot of practice time and hampered his
performance when he was out there.
     His coaches did not want to retire him or waive him  because they admired
his courage, leadership, sure hands and solid blocking, but they also liked
their four young tight ends and did not want to release one if Mularkey could
practice only a day or so a week and then play on Sundays on aching knees. 
They knew he would practice if the pain was at all bearable, and so they let
him go at his own pace for most of minicamp and training camp.
     Coach Chuck Noll spoke glowinglu of Mularkey's toughness and said he could
skip a practice or two a week, just as John Stallworth, Donnie Shell and others
did late in their careers when practice could have done more harm than good to
their aching joints and muscles.
     But two weeks ago, offensive coordinator Joe Walton told Mularkey and the
media that he would have to press hard to see if his knees would hold up.
     "No matter what they said, I didn't feel good that week," Mularkey said. 
"I couldn't practice every day because my knees hurt so bad.  But this past
week has really been encouraging."
     Mularkey practiced all last week and said his knees felt better than they
had since camp opened.  Mularkey doesn't know if they simply got better on
their own or for some strange reason were less irritated by 3 Rivers Stadium's
artificial turf than St. Vincent College's grass.  All he knows is he really
needed a good week abd a good game, and he got them.
     "My confidence level was really low.  I was just disappointed  that the
knee had bothered me as much as it had.  I felt good in all of the games; the
adrenaline was flowing.  My problem's been not being able to practice.  It
showed I hadn't practiced because I didn't play very well.  I'm the type of
player who needs to practice to play well on Sundays."
     A couple of other recent developments convinced the coaches to keep
Mularkey when they cut the roster today.
     Eric Green figures to be the focus of the offense, but he's missed the
past three games with an inflammation in his knee.  He's expected to return to
practice late this week and play in the regular season opener against the San
Diego Chargers, but if he can't play full time, they need Mularkey's experience
and receiving ability more than ever.




JaKe

35.146CELTIK::JACOBHoneysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong ballsWed Aug 28 1991 00:0122
    Steelers roster moves are as follows:
    
    Placed on IR:
    	Gary Jones
    	Delton Hall
    	Sammy Walker
    
    Signed to practice squad:	
    	Ariel Solomon
    	Jarrod Johnson
    	Gary Howe
    	Ron Fair
    
    Recalled to the team:
    	Kevin Smith
    	Shawn Vincent
    
    One roster slot is still open, that will be filled by the addition of
    Rod Woodson later this week.
    
    JaKe
    
35.147Whom to contact in BeantownSHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youWed Aug 28 1991 11:3011
    Ed,
    
    Contact Linda Hooke of the Pittsburgh Boston Club.  Her number is
    617-495-7744.  She lives in Summerville.
    
    You can tell her you got her name from me (Daniel Medvid, Black and
    Gold Club of Charlotte).
    
    Good luck to yunz.
    
    	--dan'l
35.148David Little signed!GOBUCS::COOLEYThe Pittsburgh Fan in D.C.Wed Aug 28 1991 13:1514
So it seems David Little has signed.  Any quotes from Emporer Chas?

Assuming that they stayed in shape on their own, anyone else think that Woodson
and Little are going to be pretty impressive during the end of the season 
because they skipped the preseason?  Do they lose any pay for missing the
preseason?  

I missed Delton Hall's injury.  What's he out for?  Would he have started
anyway?

Looking forward to a super season - the Bubster permitting.

Warren on Sports 
35.149Thanks in advanceMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Aug 28 1991 17:225
    Whats the Steelers Recieving Squad look like, they drafted a speedster
    in the 3rd round who held out 2 long.  NOLL felt he wouldnt make the
    team due to the holdout, I dont recall his name but I dont think He's
    been Cut..Details please
    
35.150BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSWed Aug 28 1991 18:4912
    Well lets see....Chargers @ Steelers.  
    
    Chargers:  Good D, good special teams, no passing game, new qb, Butts
      	 	just now got into camp.
    
    Steelers:  At home, good D....but how's the offense....how's the
    		special teams?  Has Walton instituted more offensive
    		changes?  Is Brister ok with them?
    
    How 'bout some light on this.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
35.151CARROL::LEFEBVREForBestResults,SqueezeFromBottomWed Aug 28 1991 18:568
    Bubbly Blister's (tm) mom will be in attendance.
    Joe Walton's index finger will be in attendance.
    
    Hence, Chargers and the points.
    
    HTH,
    
    Mark.
35.152Some infoSHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youWed Aug 28 1991 18:5723
    RE: 149
    
    None of the Steelers 1st string and rookie receivers had much of a
    chance to show much in the preseason due to Brister's poor showing.
    
    With that said...
    
    RE: 150
    
    Glenn,
    
    Unless the Steelers offense wakes up like it did against San Diego last
    season, Chargers should win in a low-scoring game.  Steelers continue
    to lack a pass rush and it looks like another five weeks or so for the
    offense to click.
    
    The only way I see the Steelers winning this one is if the secondary
    picks off a few and puts Anderson in field goal range because Brister
    can't seem to move the team.  The only other hope offensively is the
    running of Merill Hoge and Barry Foster.  Eric Green was hurt last I
    heard.
    
    	--dan'l
35.153BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSWed Aug 28 1991 19:337
    dan'l -
    
    Why are the Steelers having problems with this offense?  Isn't it the
    same one that they used last year?  Is there somethin' new to get used
    to?
    
    Glenn
35.154Steelers by 7 to 10CELTIK::R_QUINNWed Aug 28 1991 23:5417
    
    dan'l
    
    I tend to disagree with your game summary.  Because of the following
    reasons.  The chargers have no passing game and the steelers run
    defense is their strong suit because of the lack to pass rush.  The
    steeler db's are still the best in the league.  The offense for the
    steelers hasn't been fluid but there have been a few big plays in the
    preseason.  If those plays don't occur at the time of penalty the
    steelers will be fine.
    
    I suspect a 17-10, 20-13 or 20-10 victory for the steelers will
    transpire.  It also helps that they are at home.
    
    Roy L.
    Almost time to get my fix!!!!!!
    No more substitutes for this football junkie.
35.155CELTIK::JACOBHoneysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong ballsWed Aug 28 1991 23:5816
    Glenn, their offensive problems, according to the papers here in
    Pittsburgh, are mostly because Joe "Booger" Walton has implemented
    completely the complex offense he simplified after a few games lasted
    year.  It remains to be seen how the Steelers will adapt to this
    offense, but, I could be offering a Steeler mug again this year if they
    don't get their asses in gear.
    
    Also heard a rumor that the playbook has some problems with the
    diagrams of the plays, seems Walton made the copies himself and some of
    the originals had some "residue" fromople "Booger" Joe's fingers and
    the players are confused as to the pass routes the receivers are
    supposed to run .
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.156list them allSTRATA::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Thu Aug 29 1991 12:0219
    
    Oh comeon...why not list a few more...you'll surely get one...
    
    	7 - 0
    
    	14-7
    
    	21 - 17
    
    	32 - 21
    
    	etc.....
    
    		The Squeelers can't do anything right with 
    
    	BUBBLE BUTT BONE BABY BOARD BRAT BUSTER BROWN at the helm!
    
    		Dirty Dawg
    
35.157BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSThu Aug 29 1991 14:257
    Well, I'll be watching with NFL eyes on Sunday.  With any luck for me,
    Friesz will have another hot day and my Chargers will prevail.
    
    Do I have a prediction?  .... yes, the Chargers won't lose by 5 pts or
    more.
    
    Glenn
35.158BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSFri Aug 30 1991 19:0251
I got this off the internet
    


	The Bubby story:

	Here's a short article from this weeks Steelers Digest:
	Reprinted without permission.
	
	Quarterback Club: After a good showing in two preseason outings,
	some people were a bit premature in wondering how long
	quarterback Neil O'Donnell would remain a backup. Bubby Brister
	has a firm grip on the starting spot, but is glad to see his
	backup doing well in his first season. "This is my team, and
	it's my job," Brister said. "I'm happy for Neil. He's like a
	brother to me, and I'm glad he's doing a great job. But once we
	get going in the regular season, nobody will remember what
	happened in the pre-season. Once I'm playing well and we're
	winning games, people will come back to the real world."



	Other news:
	   Woodson hasn't signed as of this paper (aug 24).
	The defense really misses him. The offense vs the Eagles (3rd
	preseason game) sounded OK. There were a few things like holding
	etc that hurt drives, but the running game seemed to be going
	really well. Hodge and Foster (Merril Hodge, Barry Foster).
	Foster has beenb known to be fumble prone, and that's why he
	didn't get much time last year. This year, Tim Worley is down
	for a couple of weeks for knee surgery.

	   Foster is also the "very silly person" who let the kickoff roll
	to the five yard line in last years game against the 49er's. The
	9er's took it in for a touchdown (kickoffs are live, unlike
	punts), and never looked back.

	   Foster is tearing up camp, and should be a lock to start. It's
	only his second year, so he could be a great one.


	   After the loss to the Eagles, the Steelers are 1-2 in pre-season.


-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
       ZIP                  "Guitar playing is like sex, except half   
Hey Marty! Hey Lance!        way through a gig, you can switch guitars." 
BUBBY LIVES! (I hope)        GOOOOOO  KEEENNNN, I mean SAINTS!


35.159SD double duty or slight of handCELTIK::R_QUINNFri Aug 30 1991 22:0711
    
    .158
    
    Could there be some slight of hand going on here or multiple
    plublications calling themselves Steeler Digest.  I have at hand the
    august 24 issue and the previously stated words are yet to grace my
    eyes.  Granted those sound like some of Bubby's words but if one could
    be so kind as to direct me to them(ie page numb)  I would be glod
    consume me words.
    
    Roy L. 
35.160O-'-D-O-N-N-E-L-L for cripes sakes!SHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youMon Sep 02 1991 18:3316
    Well, I almost called it on the nose a few days ago.  Not the way the
    game would be played, nor the score, but the Steelers fans ridiculous
    penchant for wanting another Bradshaw and having no patience in the
    rebirth.  What I'm talking about is what I heard while watching the
    game with some fellow Burghers yesterday:

    Brister misses a wide open Eric 'Big' Green streaking toward the
    endzone.  Brister doesn't even see him but everyone else does.  And
    from the back of the room comes "Bench Brister!  Put that MacDonahue
    guy in!"

    Cleveland fans may be predictable assholes, but no one beats Steelers
    fans for lack of knowledge about their own team.  Myron Cope would have
    loved this guy.

    	--dan'l
35.161long gestation!EMDS::UCCOOPTue Sep 03 1991 11:5831
    Well, much to my dismay, my opening day was spent with my eyes hugging
    the tv for that oh so timely ten-minute ticker due to my failure to 
    locate a place that beamed in Steeler games. Being as such, I'd like to
    know some specifics about the Charger game. Here follows some points
    that I would love some more info on:
    
               *Is it true that Brister had a number of passes dropped?
               *From the stats it looked like Foster had a good game. 
                Elaborations anyone?
               *I have heard rumours that the pass rush fairy has once
                again skipped the Steel City and left it with no
                decent pass rushers. Is this true?
               *Four field goals! Were these shoulda-been-touchdowns (ala
                first four games of 1990)
               *How was Woodson? Richardson?
    
       Regarding the impatience for the rebirth of Bradshaw II mentioned
    in the previous reply, remember that the gestation period has been 
    unusually long and painful. It takes a sturdy and strong hearted fan 
    to endure the blazen brilliance of Stoudt at the helm, the breathtaking
    aerial circuses we came to love in the Woodley era, and the precision
    accuracy and come from behind magic of Mark Malone. This is Brister's
    fourth year at the helm. Steelers fans want results, not promises.
    I give Brister this year. (At least the first six - eight games, if 
    he can come back at all, that is. We may see more of Neville McDonough
    than we bargained for!) Bradshaw took some time too, but at the stage
    of his carrer comparable to where Brister was, the Steelers were in the
    Championship game.
       All in all, thankful for the win. On to Buffalo.
    
                                               Ed the Coop
35.162It wasn't out on the satelites for some reasonSHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youTue Sep 03 1991 12:3348
>    Well, much to my dismay, my opening day was spent with my eyes hugging
>    the tv for that oh so timely ten-minute ticker due to my failure to 
>    locate a place that beamed in Steeler games. 

    The three places in Charlotte that said they would show the Steelers
    games came up empty too.  We were forced to make a mad rush to a
    mammoth, impersonal sports bar that showed ALL the games at once on
    four big screens.
        
>               *Is it true that Brister had a number of passes dropped?

    No more than usual I would summise.

>               *From the stats it looked like Foster had a good game. 
>                Elaborations anyone?

    I would guess Foster averaged about 3-4 YPC.  I am impressed.  Worley
    is history if Foster stays healthy and fumble free.  JaKe will probably
    enter the stats if he is at home.

>               *I have heard rumours that the pass rush fairy has once
>                again skipped the Steel City and left it with no
>                decent pass rushers. Is this true?
 
    No pass rush to speak of.  Thank goodness for a great secondary.

    >              *Four field goals! Were these shoulda-been-touchdowns (ala
>                first four games of 1990)

    Two of them should have been TDs.  The offense stalls once inside the
    40.  However, the last TD shouldn't have been.  It was the second
    longest pass play in Steelers history.  Mark O'Douglas threw about an
    eight yard pass to Dwight Stone deep in the Steelers end, Stone broke
    some tackles, stayed in bounds (amazing), got a great block by Lipps
    who took out three defenders at once, and Stone was off 80 yards to the
    endzone.  So, the only play designed to go for a TD that actually did
    was the Steelers' first, Brister to Calloway.

>               *How was Woodson? Richardson?
 
    Woodson was great, David Johnson, even though he was fooled on a
    halfback option that went for a TD, may be even greater in my opinion.
       
    I didn't hear Richardson's name called the whole game.  Jerry Olsavsky
    out of Pitt may have been the most improved player.  He's added about
    30 pounds and #55 was in on every other defensive play.

    	--dan'l
35.163BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSTue Sep 03 1991 14:5610
>    Well, much to my dismay, my opening day was spent with my eyes hugging
>    the tv for that oh so timely ten-minute ticker due to my failure to 
>    locate a place that beamed in Steeler games. Being as such, I'd like to
>    know some specifics about the Charger game. Here follows some points
>    that I would love some more info on:
    
    The game was on Ku band, not C band.  I found it on satellite K2,
    transponder 31.
    
Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
35.164Bubby IIEMDS::UCCOOPTue Sep 03 1991 18:227
    Just read that Brister is expected to start Sunday's game vs Buffalo.
    Reports said he suffered a minor concussion and that it wasn't serious.
    Guess we'll have to wait to see more of Mike O'Dougal, but certainly
    not Anderson.
    
                                                Ed the Coop
    
35.165OPUS3::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Tue Sep 03 1991 19:1216
    Woodson had six tackles and 3 passes defended.
    
    I'll enter the stats from the game either tonite or tomorrow nite. 
    Don't have the sports section with the stats available, so I gotta get
    to my father's house and steal his.
    
    Richardson had 1/2 a sack, as far as I remember.
    
    Didn't get to see but the lasted 4 minutes of the game, was out camping
    and the batteries went dead on the portable TV.   Guess I gotta break
    down and buy a portable generator if'n I'm a goin campin again on game
    day.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.166Game Summary and Steeler NotesOPUS3::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Wed Sep 04 1991 00:15109

Scoring Summary
			1	2	3	4	T
San Diego		0	3	0	17	20
STEELERS		3	7	6	10	26

STEELERS-FG Anderson 38yd
SanDiego-FG Carney 48yd
STEELERS-Calloway 33 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 29yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 31yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 39yd
SanDiego-Lewis 11 yd pass from Bernstine(Carney PAT)
SanDiego-FG Carney 35 yd
STEELERS-Stone 89 yd pass from O'Donnell
SanDiego-Jefferson 5 yd pass from Friesz(Carney PAT)

TEAM STATISTICS

San Diego					STEELERS
20			1st Downs		16
23-95			Rushes-Yards		32-120
186			Passing Yds		270
31			Return Yds		60
20-42-1			Compl-Att-Int		14-25-2
3-17			Sacked-Yds Lost		1-8
5-50			Punts			3-40
2-1			Fumbles-Lost		3-0
5-30			Penalties-Yds		7-56
28:19			Time Of Possession	31:41

Individual Stats:

RUSHING:

San Diego:  Bernstine 12-50, Harmon 4-42, Butts 5-6, Friesz 2-(-3)
STEELERS:  Foster 17-78(4.0/carry), Hoge 13-41(3.2/carry), O'Donnell 1-5,
           Brister 1-(-4).

PASSING:

San Diego:  Friesz 19-41-1 int 192 yds, Bernstine 1-1-0 int, 11 yds
STEELERS:   Brister 13-21-2 int, 189 yds, O'Donnell 1-4-0 int, 89 yds

RECEIVING:

San Diego:  Lewis 6-74, Miller 5-54, Jefferson 3-23, McEwen 2-13, Walker 2-12,
            Cox 1-19, Harmon 1-8	
STEELERS:   Stone 4-124, Foster 3-48, Calloway 2-47, Green 2-30, Hoge 2-15,
            Lipps 1-14


STEELER NOTES(reprinted from Pittsburgh Post Gazette, without permission,
9-2-91)

     Linebacker Greg Lloyd is so mean that sometimes he forgets the laws of
self-preservation.
     Law No 1: When head-butting a teammate who is wearing a helmet, make sure
yuou are wearing one, too!!
     Lloyd forgot that rule after he jumped on a fumble by San Diego QB John
Friesz on the first series of yesterday's(Sunday's) game between the Steelers
and the Chargers.
     He was so excited that he whipped off his helmet, head-butted teammate Rod
Woodson, threw the football 8 rows deep into the stands and then sat stoically
on the bench as trainer Ralph Berlin applied a bandage to the cut on his
forehead.
     "Sometimes we get a little fired up out there and we do some things we
shouldn't do," Woodson said.  "That was one of them."
     The damage to Lloyd's head hardly deterred him.  After that, he came up
with 2 QB sacks and six tackles, earning a game ball from his teammates.
     Lloyd did nothing unusual in a defense that has put more emphasis on
coverages than blitzes.
     "It's the same defense," he said.  "I think I know the defense now.  If
you know what you're doing, you can make a lot of things happen."

SHADES OF TERRY:
     Steeler fans struck a 20-year old chord when they cheered in the 4th Qtr
as backup QB Neil O'Donnell came onto the field for injured starter Bubby
Brister.
     At the time, Brister was crumpled on the turf after getting sandwiched
between LB Leslie O'Neal and DE George Hinkle after he delivered a pass. 
Brister, who suffered a mild concussion, eventually wobbled off, high fiving
O'Donnell.
     The cheers were reminiscent of the time in the early 70's when fans at
Three Rivers Stadium cheered after Terry Bradshaw hurt his shoulder.  There 
was a QB controversy then between Bradshaw and backup Terry Hanratty. and there
has been a slight QB controversy in the exhibition season because O'Donnell
played so well in 2 games.
     "He took a helluva shot at the end," said O'Donnell, who said he was
concentrating too much on the next play to hear the fans.  "I think Bubby will
be OK."
     Brister was alternately booed and cheered by the 55,848 fans.

STONE STEADY:
     Twice last season, WR Dwight Stone inadvertently stepped out of bounds on
what would have been sure long touchdown passes.
     Yesterday, he snapped up O'Donnell's short pass at the 12 and converted it
into an 89 yard TD reception without once coming near a sideline.
     "I stayed in bounds!!" Stone said triumphantly.
     "It was one of those games that one big play makes a difference and I
think the big play was Stoney's,"  Coach Chuck Noll said.  "And Stoney stayed
in bounds."
     Added OT John Jackson, "That was a great catch.  When I saw he had only
one man to beat, I just waved goodbye.  Because nobody is going to catch
Stoney--unless he steps out of bounds."

JaKe

35.167fingers crossedCNTROL::CHILDSLife during Wartimes...Wed Sep 04 1991 13:427
 Jake, you have the Steelers fumbling 3 times and loosing none whilst the
 Chargers had 2 fumbles and lost 1. My paper had it the other way. Can you
 or someone else (possibly Glenn  who watched) confirm who's paper is correct?
 If Jake's correct I win in FFL, if not I loose...

 mike
35.168I think you win, MikeSHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youWed Sep 04 1991 14:343
    
    To the best of my knowledge, for what that is worth, JaKe is correct.
    
35.169Elementary my dear Watson!!!CELTIK::R_QUINNWed Sep 04 1991 14:358
    
    If the notes that Jake entered are correct then his stats indeed have
    to be correct as well.  If Lloyd recovered a fumble by John Friez, that
    would give you the one fumble lost by SD.
    
    Could be wrong but just an observation.
    
    Roy L..........'Watson
35.170BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSWed Sep 04 1991 14:459
    Sorry, I don't recall who fumbled how many times and lost how many, but
    in today's USA Today, the stats for the Steelers say:
    
    	Take-away:  1 Int + 1 Fum = 2 total
    	Give-away:  2 Int + 0 Fum = 2 total
    
    Chargers figures also bear this out....so there you go.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
35.171CSLALL::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Sep 04 1991 15:126
    Mike, I can absolutely confirm that you, my man, might be correct.  On
    the other hand, maybe you aren't.
    
    Hope this hurts,
    
    lEe
35.172CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 04 1991 18:582
    Brister suffered a concussion and is cleared to play after only 1
    week?  Sounds a little dangerous to me.
35.173CELTIK::JACOBHoneysuckle KNOWS Ping Pong ballsWed Sep 04 1991 19:127
    From what they're saying here, it was only a MILD concussion.
    
    Then again, he's a thick-haided Southern Boy, so that could explain it.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.174 ;^)CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Wed Sep 04 1991 19:3110
    JaKe,
    
    Actually he had a Corncussion.
    
    Corncussion: you stepa ona my toes, hurt me and I cuss ya out sucka!
    
    HTH
    
    Kev
    
35.175BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSWed Sep 04 1991 19:447
    All I know is that the hit he took looked pretty damn hard.  Leslie
    O'Neal hit him from behind and thrust him forward and then a split
    second later, George Hinkle hit him from the front and removed his
    helmet.  I was surprised to see him walk off the field on his own.
    I hope he's ok.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
35.176AXIS::ROBICHAUDThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBallsWed Sep 04 1991 19:502
    	Come on Glenn, how cain a guy named "Leslie" possibly hit somebody
    hard?
35.177CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 04 1991 19:508
    There is evidence that a person who gets hit in the head again after
    suffering a concussion can die.  The USARFU and other rugby governing
    bodies recommend at least a 2 week layoff after suffering a concussion. 
    There is no distinguishing between a mild and a severe concussion.  
    
    It should be noted that these are recommendations.  Players on the US
    national team have taken the field a week after suffering a concussion. 
    This has caused a bit of concern.
35.178BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSWed Sep 04 1991 23:097
    >	Come on Glenn, how cain a guy named "Leslie" possibly hit somebody
    >   hard?
    
    I remember when the Chargers drafted him out of OSU, and that's what I
    thought at the time.  It's kinda funny.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
35.179FDCV06::KINGRED SOX, lies, and videotapes!!!!Thu Sep 05 1991 13:103
    What happened to Worley
    
    REK
35.180PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonThu Sep 05 1991 14:277
>    What happened to Worley
    
	I believe he's out with a knee injury and it will be 2-4 weeks before
	he'll be able to play. I also think he's been demoted to 3rd string.

			Keith
35.181Strap your hats boyzCELTIK::R_QUINNFri Sep 06 1991 18:5014
    
    The steelers have one of those put ^ or shut ^ type games coming this
    weekend.  Normally I would give the steelers much of a chance but
    Buffalo showed considerable weakness in it's run defense.  If the
    steelers can run the ball to consume time and score on the drives,
    along with a better than average defensive effort which they are
    definitely capable off, I give them a shot in a close game.  Of course
    those are a lot of ifs'.  26 points is not a huge offensive day but it
    will win most steeler games.  Producing that many points and holding
    the bills will be a job.
    
    A Gary Anderson FG wins it at the buzzer!!!
    
    Roy L. 
35.182GOBUCS::COOLEYThe Pittsburgh Fan in D.C.Fri Sep 06 1991 19:279
Well, the network gods have seen fit to televise the PITT-BUFF game in the
D.C. area, sunday @1:00.  Eager to see what the Steeler-D can do with the
hurry up. Thurmon Thomas worries me alot. Big Test for Pittsburgh.  And not
a bad test for Buffalo, who might still be harking back to the Miami game.

At least the Bubster won't have to worry about Bruce Smith who will not be
playing.

Warren
35.183Buffalow?EMDS::UCCOOPMon Sep 09 1991 12:470
35.184Steelers get a wake up call?GOBUCS::COOLEYThe Pittsburgh Fan in D.C.Mon Sep 09 1991 14:1726
Buffalo 52, Steelers 34

52 points against the mighty Steeler D.  6 Td passes by Jim Kelly.

I thought the game was over at halftime, the Steelers were definitely staring
at the abyss.  But they looked good for the third quarter - two INT's - but 
Bubby couldn't push in the touchdown to tie the game and Steelers were back
into the abyss.

I was kind a dissappointed with Woodson, got burned pretty bad by Lofton and
then missed some kick-of returns because he was out of Oxygen.  But, everybody
looked out of Oxygen and Kelly's passes were right on.  

The comparison between Kelly and Bubby makes you wonder.  I mean Bubby was OK
but he's not going to any super bowls unless he gets alot better.  Kelly was
great, except for the two INT's - but he adjusted right away.  Also, Thurmon
Thomas' run in the third quarter - when he was basically injured - was the
ballgame.  Great back.

So the Steelers have seen what a great team looks like.  Can they regroup and
get it together by the playoffs?

Warren

P.S. I hadn't seen Joe Walton in action before. Boy, he needs some help.
     He just can't keep his hands away from his face!! It's unbelievable.
35.185PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Sep 09 1991 14:3719
  Since they were on national TV, I finally got to see the Black and Gold 
  play this year. What happened to the league's top rated defense ? I quess
  they're just not as good as last year's stats indicate. 

  The Steeler's definately got robbed when Kelly fumbled the ball trying to 
  avoid the pass rush and probably got robbed when they ruled the pass intended
  for Hoge was intercepted and run back for a TD. But I don't think either
  bad call would have made any difference. Buffalo definately played better
  football. Kelly looked awesome and Brister looked average at best. But
  in all fairness, the Steeler offensive line didn't give Brister as much
  time as he needed.

  On the bright side, Barry Foster looks like the best Steeler running back
  since Franco Harris. Also, did anybody else see the block by Eric Green
  on Foster's long TD run ? That has got to be the most devastating block
  I've ever seen. It looked like Green knocked the guy 4 or 5 feet in the
  air. 

					Keith
35.186GOBUCS::COOLEYThe Pittsburgh Fan in D.C.Mon Sep 09 1991 14:449
Yeah, I forgot about Barry Foster.  He looked good, but didn;t get enough
chances.

I think the great block on his long run was by #87 (forget his name) and
not Green - although Joe Willie though it was Green too.  Namath did a
pretty good job, though, I thought.  But maybe I was just glad that we didn't
get enberg and Coach walsh.

Warren  
35.187The silver lining:SHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youMon Sep 09 1991 16:1819
    A few things I was impressed with:
    
    	- Barry Foster.  He has star written all over him.  Great mid-round
    	  pick last year.
    
    	- Eric Green's block.  Yes it was #86.  Made Keith Byers' block
    	  on Pepper Johnson last year look like a pat on the rump.  Wow
    	  did he level that guy!
    
    	- Jerry Olsavsky.  My goodness what a steal in the 11th round.  
    	  He was all over the field.  For a linebacker that small, he
    	  sure plays tough.  Shows what you can overcome if you play
    	  smart ball.
    
    	- The Bills and Jim Kelly especially.  But remember that their 
    	  defense gave up a lot of points also, and for two weeks in a
    	  row at that.
    
    		--dan'l
35.1881-1 and who knows what lies aheadCELTIK::JACOBSEX IS DIRTY..only when done properlyTue Sep 10 1991 00:0555
SCORING SUMMARY
        	1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS 	0	10	17	7		34
Buffalo		10	14	7	21		52

Buffalo-	Lofton, 53 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo-	FG Norwood 50 yds
STEELERS-	FG Anderson 25 yd
Buffalo-	Beebe 34 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo-	Beebe 14 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
STEELERS_	Foster 56 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Buffalo-	Reed 14 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
STEELERS-	W.Williams 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-	Hinkle 57 yd interception return(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-	FG Anderson 27 yd
Buffalo-	Beebe 11 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo-	Beebe  4 yd pass from Kelly(Norwood PAT)
Buffalo-	Odomes 32 yd interception return(Norwood PAT)
STEELERS-	Hoge 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)

Attendance-79,545

TEAM STATS:

STEELERS						Buffalo
14			1st Downs			31
23-152			Rushes-Yards			40-194
113			Passing Yards			343
15-29-1			Comp-Att-Int			31-43-2
2-21			Sacked-yards Lost		2-20
6-36			Punts				2-32
0-0			Fumbles-Lost			1-1
9-63			Penalties-Yards			5-53
26:53			Time Of Possession		33:06

INDIVIDUAL STATS:

RUSHING:
STEELERS----Foster 9-121, Hoge 10-32, W.Williams 4-(-1)
Buffalo-----Thomas 15-107, K.Davis 17-56, Gardner 6-21, Reed 1-11, Reich 1-(-1)

PASSING:
STEELERS----Brister 15-29-1-134 yds
Buffalo-----Kelly 31-43-2-363 yds, Reich 0-0-0-0

RECEIVING:
STEELERS----Hoge 4-36, Mularkey 3-42, E.Green 3-31, Lipps 3-29, W.Williams 2-6
Buffalo-----Beebe 10-112, Reed 9-118, Lofton 4-78, Thomas 4-35, McKeller 2-22,
	    Metzelaars 1-1, K.Davis 1-(-3).



JaKe


35.189Steeler NotesCELTIK::JACOBSEX IS DIRTY..only when done properlyTue Sep 10 1991 00:1427
    Did anybody else who watched the Steeler game yesterday think they saw
    Harvey "Toast" Calyton in the Steeler secondary??????Could've sworn I
    saw him!!!!
    
    Woodson and David Johnson got beat bad, BUT, was Thomas Everett
    conspicious by his inability to get to where he should've been.
    Numerous times he failed to give the help that is his to give deep.
    
    Re Brister, I ain't going to condemn the guy, nor will I praise him,
    BUT, if Kelly was only getting about 2 seconds to throw, do you think
    they would've pummeled the STEELERS the way they did????
    I say "Nah".
    
    Brister was most effect when the play was designed for him to roll out
    to avoid the pursuit while looking for his receivers.  If the Steelers
    don't start giving him time, it's going to be one long season.
    
    Foster gained the most yards since Earnest Jackson gained 125 vs. the
    Chiefs in 1987.  He injured his ankle on his 9th carry, but he returned
    in the 4th Qtr, but only carried one more time, and that was nullified
    by a penalty.
    
    Hinkle's 57 yd TD interception return was the longest Int return by a
    Linebacker since Chuck Noll became coach.
    
    JaKe
    
35.190long season indeed.STRATA::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Tue Sep 10 1991 11:3715
    
    Another INT.....the streak continues!  
    
    	When are they going to take him out of the game........not the 
    coach.........the other team.
    
    	Face it Jake, the Squeelers will go no where with .....
    
    BUBBLE BUTT BONEHEAD BARF BELLY BEAN BAG BUSTER BROWN trying to
    lead the team through a game.  The guy already threw 3 INT'S this
    year.  How many TD's has he thrown?  If he was a real QB, he would
    dump the ball off to someone out of the backfield instead of getting
    his BUBBLE BUTT kicked!
    
    	Dirty Dawg
35.191CAM::WAYIrene Ryan is SUCH a babe!Tue Sep 10 1991 11:465
>    If he was a real QB, he would
>    dump the ball off to someone out of the backfield instead of getting
>    his BUBBLE BUTT kicked!
    
I thought real QB's ate the ball, like Bernice?
35.192Squeelers by 14....?????????STRATA::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Tue Sep 10 1991 11:5212
    
    Wrong Mr. Way......your Way out!
    
    	Bernie would eat the ball and take the sack if no one was open or
    there was a chance of an INT.  If the rush is comming fast.....he dumps
    the ball off to backfield man.....METCALF.
    	If BUBBBBBBLY doesn't start watching Bernie or one of the other top
    5 QB's in the league, he won't walk by the end of the season.
    	BTW, Bernie has had plenty of time to throw the ball this year!
    
    	Dirty Dawg
    
35.193CAM::WAYIrene Ryan is SUCH a babe!Tue Sep 10 1991 12:1310
>    Wrong Mr. Way......your Way out!

Hardly ever.  And it's "you're" not "your".

Anyway, I'm just repeating what you said yesterday.  If you said it, and
then qualify it later with "Well, in this case he does this, and in that
case he does that", then how can I be wrong?

If you've got an answer for that, call Unsolved Mysteries.....    

35.194Bills DayFSOA::HEANEYTue Sep 10 1991 13:1719
    I watched most of the Bills game and I was impressed with the Bills,
    it looks like they can score at will. I don't think it matters what
    team they play they will score.
    
    I was very impressed with Foster he is going to be a great running
    back.
    
    Did any one else see Walton picking his nose? He is in love with his
    nose, he is always touching it, has his hands on it etc etc.
    
    
    Bottom line: it was the Bills day and the Steelers where this weeks
    victims. Do the Browns play the Bills this year? If they do and the
    Bills play as they did against the Steelers the Browns will get smoked.
    
    JMHO
    Mike
    
    
35.195SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Sep 10 1991 15:1250
    
    	First things first.  I did not see the game, so I can only comment
    on it through replays and news articles.
    
    	Before I'd jump all over the Bills bandwagon, I'd remind many that
    they scored at will because they were playing the Steelers.  I never 
    believed the No. 1 ranking the defense earned last year which I believe
    was mainly due to a weaker schedule.  I have thought for years that
    the Steeler's on defense were doing it with mirrors and Sundays game
    seemed to indicate that.
    
    	For the life of me, I don't understand how one of the best, if not
    the best corner in the league can get beat badly not once, but twice.
    I might be able to accept this a little more if it were one of the
    best receivers in the league, but Lofton has seen better days and I
    wouldn't put him in the top 10.
    
    	Looking at the stats around tackles shows that the defensive
    backfield was real busy which isn't good.  Again, no pass rush.  You
    would think that they would of tried more stuff seeing that Kelly
    was hurt and his mobility was hindered, but seeing that he got of
    40+ attempts shows that he was able to throw at will.
    
    	Then we come down to the fact that one Steeler TD was scored by
    the defense (again) and another score was set up by interceptions.
    Here again we see a offense that is rather inept.  Lipps only has 2-3
    receptions (again) so I have to ask what is going on?  People make
    a big deal about Foster gaining 125 yards but was the game in question
    when he was tearing it up?  It was 24-10 at halftime and really should
    of been 24-3.  So again I have to ask, what's the big deal.  Buffalo
    had the game in control in the first half and probably weren't as 
    intense on defense had the game been closer.
    
    	Now after two games, I see the same old, same old.  The offense
    after a whole year and all of preseason still can't seem to move the
    ball.  Brister is still to inconsistant for my money.  The defense is
    really suspect seeing that the front 4 can't get near the QB thus 
    putting all the pressure on the secondary.
    
    	In all, it looks like a long season.  I wouldn't be surprised to
    see the Pats beat the Steelers this Sunday either.  Maybe they should
    lay low and hope that Van Pelt is around come draft time.
    
    	On the positive side, I'm glad to hear that Oslavsky (sp) is doing
    so well.  Although he was a real small LB at Pitt, he always seemed to
    have his nose in every play.  He seems like a guy with a lot of desire.
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.196FSOA::HEANEYTue Sep 10 1991 16:427
    re -1
    
    I am not jumping on the Bills bandwagon and I do know they were playing
    against the Steelers.
    
    Mike
    
35.197a better game than the score would indicate and they'll crush NECNTROL::CHILDSWill it be a boy or a girl?Tue Sep 10 1991 18:1929
 Bill, it just as easily could have been 24-17 at the half as well. For some
 one who didn't see the game I don't know how you can say it could have
 easily been 24-3. The interception TD came in the second half. Lofton made
 a great fake on Wodson turned him inside out. 

 I agree the lack of a pass rush killed the Steelers more than anything else.
 The no huddle confused them and the humpty nine zillion crossing patterns
 that the Bills run killed them.
 
 The Bills are a marvelous offensive team loaded with weapons. As the Giants
 proved the only way to stop them at this stage of the game is to keep the
 ball out of there hands.

 Foster's yards came throughout the game so I don't think you can chalk it up
 to the Bills playing soft. More likely you can contribute the largeness of the
 number to one 57 yard run that resulted in a TD. Still though he ran with
 power as well as showing speed and cutback ability.

 Bubby was Bubby but when he did get time he did checkoff and look for second
 and third options...

 The Steelers really shot themselves in the foot by jumping offsides on too
 many third down plays. In all likely hood buffalo probably would have gotten
 the first down anyways but it sure doesn't help when you hand it to them.
 
 mike
     

35.198SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Sep 10 1991 18:4529
    
    	It was not my intent to say that Buffalo is not a decent team and
    that they looked good only because they played Pittsburgh.
    
    	I did try to say that Buffalo is not as good as some would like
    you to believe, especially with a QB that can barely walk.
    
    	Steeler fans need to wake up a little because I'm getting tired
    of listening to the same old song week in week out.  Last year the
    Steelers failed to beat a team over .500 (I think), and at present
    rate, they look to repeat that.  Used to be when they played a good
    team, they would rise to the occasion win or loose.  Lately though,
    it appears they save their worst appearances for the over .500 teams.
    
    	Again, so Woodson got beat once with a good fake.  Can happen to
    the best of them.  But twice in the same game, no way.  Which reminds
    me, how about defensive adjustments?  Seems like some folks fell asleep
    at the switch.
    
    	I'm still and will always be a Pittsburgh fan, but I refuse to
    call a spade a club.  Simply put, the Steeler's are no better than
    a .500 team, and show no signs (with present personel) of rising
    above that.  Their no. 1 defense ranking last year was a fluke.  In
    the game that counted for the playoffs, the No. 1 defense went south
    for the winter, which is something the defense of the 70's would of
    never done.
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.199Go Pats!AXIS::ROBICHAUDPatriotsJuggernautInvadesSteelCityThu Sep 12 1991 17:421
    
35.200Big Game's Team = Patriots...... I Love `Em !QUASER::HUNTERDec 8th, Bronco's buck Clowns and it's my B-dayThu Sep 12 1991 22:085
    The Patsies can't lose this game.....  They are after all the best team 
    to ever take the field in the history of the game of football as we
    know it.......     ;^)
    
    Big Game
35.201PatriotsJugglenautInvadesSteelCityCSLALL::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Sep 13 1991 10:541
    
35.202We'll take W'sCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Sep 16 1991 12:486
    
    From the highlights it didn't look pretty but that appears to be afc
    central this year.  Eric Green still looks like a winner.  What's the
    skinny?
    
    Roy L. 
35.203PITheticEMDS::UCCOOPMon Sep 16 1991 13:2124
    Overall, I am disappointed with the performance of the Steelers.
    
    Why? Here's why:
    
       * No running game. (Foster had one decent 9 yarder around tackle,
         which seems to be his most effective running spot, so the 
         Steelers decide to run him right up the middle the rest of the
         afternoon and send Hoge on sweeps.)
      
       * One touchdown. One. The offense seemed to run smoothly between 
         the thirties, and then just quit. But what else is new.
    
       * Brister hit a lot of short "quick" passes to give him a rather
         impressive completion percentage. But he badly missed a sure
         catch to Lipps in the endzone and the third down percentage
         was pathetic.
    
    I'm fearful for next week. We all know what happens to the Steeler 
    offense when faced with a decent pass rush. And the Eagles..........
    
    
                                  2-1, but does that really mean anything,
    
                                  Ed the Coop
35.204SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Sep 16 1991 15:3933
    
    	My first chance to see the Steeler's apart from pre-season and I
    gotta say that at least there is one other team that is worse.
    
    	The Steeler's have no pass rush at all.  Most of the game, Hodson
    was able to stand there and fire at will.  Only late in the game did
    the Steeler's put some pressure on him.  The Pat's were also very 
    effective in running the ball which scares me.  Again, this points to
    the front 7 in that they are not controlling the line.
    
    	As for the Steeler offense, it stunk.  They have the same problems
    they did 7 years ago.  Once they get inside the 20, they can't seem
    to score a TD.  If it weren't for Gary Anderson, this team would be
    in serious trouble.  I also thought the playcalling was dismal at best.
    Many times the Steeler's would try 2 running plays which resulted in
    3rd and long situations only to find that Bubby couldn't deliver.
    
    	For all the hype about Foster, I didn't see a thing.  Of course he
    didn't get the ball that much, but when he did, he was stuffed pretty
    good.
    
    	Major concerns for me is that the Steeler's don't have any kind of
    pass rush and Brister can't seem to move the team once they get inside
    the 30.
    
    	As for Eric Green, he is awesome.  He was looking for people to 
    run over once he caught the ball.  If this guy had a QB to get the
    ball to him, he'd be the best in the league no problem.  The guy is
    a monster with great hands.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.205GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreMon Sep 16 1991 19:5816
    I hope the Steelers can wait one more week to get a defensive line. The
    Eagles have considerable difficulty running the ball and could use a
    weak line to try to get some confidence. They didn't allow the Cowboys
    to get to the QB at all last Sunday, but Jimmy Mac was their leading
    rusher with 19 yds. To top it off, the Eagles lead back, Thomas
    Sanders, sprained an ankle and may be out for an extended period. Also
    going down yesterday was Calvin Williams (WR). 
    
    I would  think thatg the Steelers would need to exploit the short
    passing game on early downs to try and deflect some of the Eagles pass
    rush and hope for the best. The Eagles will come out trying to run the
    ball down the Steelers throats and then go to a mid range passing game
    when that doesn't work (which it never does).
    
    Dennis
    
35.206Steelers 2-1, Iggles NextedCELTIK::JACOBItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!!Tue Sep 17 1991 03:2326
    Chalk up a win for the Steelers, but it sure weren't pretty.
    
    Brister continues to fail to produce.  Sure his stats were good(22-29-0
    262 yds 1 td) but pure stats don't win games.  IMHO, he just waits too
    long to get rid of the ball, or he throws it too soft when he should
    rifle it, or visa versa.   
    
    The Steeler offensive line sipped undiscreetly yesterday also, aloowing
    tacklers to hit the running backs before the plays had too much of a
    chance to develop.   
    
    Special teams was a bright spot, though. Gary Anderson kicked his 56th
    straight field goal of 35 yards or less, plus buried the ball to the
    deep part of the end zone on all but one kick-off.  Anderson is kicking
    the ball much deeper this year on kickoffs than he was last year.
    
    Ernie Mills first career TD was a gift from New England punter Brian
    Wagner.  One of Wagners blockers moved back on the kick from the end
    zone and the ball hit another Patriot's back and bounced right into
    Mills' hands for the TD.
    
    I'll put the stats from the game in here tomorrow.
    
    
    JaKe
     
35.2072-1 and not proud of itCELTIK::JACOBItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!!Wed Sep 18 1991 02:5459
    
    Scoring Summary
    			1	2	3	4		T
    New England		0	6	0	0		6
    STEELERS		3	3	0	14		20
    
    STEELERS--FG Anderson 49 yd
    Patriots--FG Staurovsky 33 yd
    Patriots--FG Staurovsky 28 yd
    STEELERS--FG Anderson 32 yd
    STEELERS--E.Green 32 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
    STEELERS--E.Mills 0yd punt return(Anderson PAT)
    Attendance--53,703
    
    TEAM STATS:
    Patriots						STEELERS
    12			First Downs			16
    29-82		Rushes-Yards			21-43
    92			Passing Yards			247
    11-25-2		Compl-Att-Int			22-29-0
    0			Return Yards			100
    3-22		Sacked-Yards Lost		1-15
    6-37		Punts				4-36
    0-0			Fumbles-Lost			3-2
    8-50		Penalties-Yards			7-60
    33:06		TimeOfPossession		26:54
    
    INDIVIDUAL STATS:
    
    RUSHING:
    Patriots: Russell 16-47, Allen 3-17, Stephens 6-11, Hunter 3-6, Hodson
              1-1
    STEELERS: Foster 14-32, Hoge 6-13, Brister 1-(-1)
    
    PASSING:
    Patriots: Hodson 11-24-2 114yds, Fryar 0-1-0 0yds
    STEELERS: Brister 22-29-0-262
    
    RECEIVING:
    Patriots: Fryar 5-62, Cook 3-21, Russell 1-18, Stephens 1-10, Hunter
   	      1-3
    STEELERS: Lipps 7-86, E.Green 4-63, Hoge 4-28, Stone 3-31, Foster 2-19,
              W.Williams 1-29, Mularkey 1-6.
    
    STEELER NOTES:
    
    Louis Lipps passed Lynn Swann on the all time STEELER receiving list
    and moved into second place behind John Stallworth.  Lipps had 7
    catches for 86 yards, giving him 5,476 career receiving yards.
    
    Swann played 9 seasons, Lipps is 3 games into his 8th season.
    
    HB Leroy Thompson and Defensive Lineman were on the inactive list for
    the game.  Thompson has a hamstring injury while Richardson has  a knee
    problem.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.208Bad NewsCELTIK::JACOBItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!!Wed Sep 18 1991 20:0220
    It was reported today the OL Brian Blankenship has been advised by
    doctors to retire from football.   Blankenship suffered a neck injury
    Sunday vs. the Pats and after being seen by team and other physicians,
    was diagnosed as having a problem between the third and fourth
    vertebrae that, if stressed by further play, could result in
    blankenship's paralysis.
    
    Blankenship's agent released the prognosis but Blankenship said he
    wants to see another specialist or 2 before making any decisions.
    
    In related news, the Steeler luck with first round picks just goes on
    and on.  Tom Ricketts, who was the Steelers second pick in the first
    round the year they got Tim "perpetually injured" Worley has been
    listed as 8th on the Steelers depth chart as far as OL go.  When
    Blankenship went down Sunday, Chuck Noll chose to substitute Terry Long
    for Blankenship instead of Ricketts, who has been described by Steeler
    coaches as disappointing, very disappointing.
    
    JaKe
    
35.209I found this funnyCELTIK::JACOBItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!!Thu Sep 19 1991 00:18102
GOOD BOOS NOTHING BUT PASSION WITH A PUNCH
         by
      Gene Collier
reprinted without permission from The Pittsburgh Press 9-17-91

A somewhat unusual element has turned up in the otherwise common fallout of the
first two Steelers home games, it being this sudden consignment to the media on
the matter of appropriate vs. inappropriate crowd response.

Like BOOING is an applied science, right???

Two consecutive home crowds, which are largely the same throbbing mass, have
been ripped via typical media truculence on two counts of inappropriate
response, the first for apparently cheering an injury to quarterback Bubby
Brister and the second for booing Brister during a performance that would wind
up looking favorable statistically.

Prison terms aren't likely.

The first count can't be proven and the second assumes that those booing are
doing so in spite of the up-to-the-minute statistical printouts provided
constantly to the 59,000 seats.

Although the medias position on that first count is that you have to be some
form of rodentia to purposely cheer an injury, you may only have to be a half
rodentia with half a bag on.  Refreshing beverages with alcoholic content are
sold at these meetings, remember, many in cups big enough to qualify as an
aquarium.  We needn't be stunned when confronted with evidence of a diminished
understanding of the humanities.

But the second count is actually troubling.  It has been suggested that many
boo out of ignorance.  It has been suggested that lack of effort is the only
rational impetus for booing.  It has been suggested that booing is stupid,
inasmuch as it can detract from a performance the crowd is there to support.

BOOING, obviously, is getting way too much analysis!!

BOOING is an inalienable right of the paying customer.  It is not vulgar.  It
is merely the opposite of cheering.  It is simply a way for an audience to tell
the performer that right here, right now, they are not happy.  BOOING is one of
the great sounds of sport, so demonstratively superior to the murmur and moan
of golf and the squeal and gasp of tennis that comparison insults the booer.

A great boo, a giant, caustic, Philadelphia-quality boo actually begins with a
guttural "m" sound and explodes out of it.     "mmmBOOOOOO."  It's the kind
Mike Schmidt, Hall of Famer to be, used to get in the playoffs.  Not out of
ignorance, not out of nonsupport, out of passion.  Right there, right then,
they were very unhappy with him.  That's all it meant.  He may as well know it,
don't you think??

As for the support angle, the first two Three Rivers Stadium crowds supported
the club with something in the neighborhood of $2 million per game in ticket,
parking, and concession prices.  I think that fulfills their obligation.  The
people on the sofas might find their comportment objectionable, might find the
studio audience a little different than the one on "The Price Is Right".  But
you know, you get into "The Price Is Right" for free.

"How about this lovely four-poster bed?  OOOOOOH, AAAAAAH!!"

"How about this lovely 2-yard run by Merrill Hoge??  BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!"

I don't think it's so complicated.  I had thought of setting up the media
bureau of boo control, through which you can request a boo application for a
boo license, and I was wrestling with the idea of a possible seven-day boo
waiting period, but I figured I'd just give you this list instead.

If, to you, to boo or not to boo is really a question at Steelers games, you
might want to consult these very general guidelines.  The rest of you may
proceed on instinct.

Bubby hurt:  Don't boo
You paid for tickets, but got complimentary parking:  Boo quietly.
Hoge runs wide:  BOO
Steelers punt on 4th and 1 inside opponents 40:  BOO
Steelers punt on 4th and 2 inside the opponents 40: BOO
Steelers punt on 4th and 3 inside the opponents 40:  Grumble to yourself
Gary Anderson:  DON'T BOO
you never played the game:  Boo infrequently
You played in high school:  Don't boo in the first 3 quarters
You played in college:  Boo after halftime
You played Div. I-A college ball:  Boo anytime after the 1st quarter
You played pro ball:  BOO anytime
You coached pro ball:  Boo the warm-ups
You played AND coached pro ball:  Boo your wife
Your wife played pro ball:  DON'T BOO
Bubby overthrows:  Boo
Bubby underthrows:  Boo
Bubby calls time:  Boo
Bubby completes an 8-yard pass on third and 9:  Boo
Bubby is sacked:  Boo
Bubby is hurried:  Boo
Bubby fumbles snap:  Boo
Barry Foster is replaced:  Boo
Joe Walton wears baseball cap backwards:  Boo
You are tailgating:  Don't boo
You are listening to Chuck Noll's pregame show while tailgating:  Boo
Halftime shoe:  Don't boo
Pre-game presentation of pingpong table-sized check to worthy charity:Don't boo

I'll bet you knew that last one.


35.210SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Fri Sep 20 1991 18:3510
    
    re: .209
    
    	Too funny!!  I always thought the Pittsburgh Press sports writers
    were better than what I've read in different parts of the country, and
    this piece is another gem.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.211Gene Collier and Bob Smizik are two of the bestCELTIK::JACOBItTakesAColdOneToHeatThingsUp!!Fri Sep 20 1991 21:4413
    re-.1
    
    I agree with ya on the quality of sportswriters in Pittsburgh.  Now I
    gotta figure out how to get the wife to keep the ~30 newspapers laying
    around cause I'm headed for Colorado Sunday and won't be back in
    Pittsburgh until Oct. 19th.  I want to look thru the papers when I gets
    back to see if there are any other good gems available.  She's a clean 
    freak and pitches the  newspaper as soon as I lay it down.  Sure is tough 
    reading thru coffee grounds and other garbage if I forget to lack it away!!
                        
    (8^)*
    
    
35.212Put that McDonnell Douglas guy in!SHALOT::MEDVIDI'll find myself as I go homeMon Sep 23 1991 12:181
    
35.213CELTIK::JACOBMe&amp;MySolarPanelInColoradoSpringsMon Sep 23 1991 13:279
    Anybody who saw the game able to give a summary in here.  I'm not going
    to be able to enter the stats so could somebody else take care of it
    for me????
    
    
    Thanks
    
    JaKe
    
35.214Steelers looked great early but ...SHALOT::HUNTRumblin', bumblin', stumblin' ...Mon Sep 23 1991 13:4230
 Dan'l Medvid and I watched the Eagles-Steelers game together at a
 sports bar in Charlotte.  The Steelers got off to a great start with
 scoring drives on their first two possessions.   They certainly
 looked prepared and focused.  Eric Green was a one-man wrecking crew.  
 He was open short, open medium, and open long.
 
 The Eagles did score on a long drive of their own in between the
 Steelers two scores so they were in position to keep pushing for the
 lead.    Then Roy Green entered the game and that was it.   The
 Eagles picked him up off the waiver wire last week to replace Calvin
 Williams (shoulder) and the two old vets, McMahon and Green, looked
 like they had been playing together for years.   Green caught 6 for
 114 yards.
 
 Meanwhile, the Eagles got 2 FG's in the 2nd quarter and the defense
 finally cooled the Steelers' offense.  Halftime was 14-13.
 
 Second half was a no contest.  Steelers offense was gone which played
 right into the Eagles' hands.  The defensive line could tee off and
 Brister was on the run the entire half.   He didn't handle the
 pressure very well but at least he didn't take the beating Aikman
 took lasted week.   Eagles' offense scored 10 boring points and it
 was over, 24-13.
 
 The Steelers definitely looked great in the first quarter and then
 they slid pretty quickly after that.   Losing Rod Woodson with a neck
 sprain was a big blow.    Didn't lose any ground, though, because the
 entire AFC Central took the collar yesterday.
 
 Bob Hunt
35.215FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Sep 23 1991 14:0010
    First downs were 20-11, Phil.  Penalties were virtually non-existent. 
    Philly had the ball for almost 40 minutes.  Rushing was Philly 36/95,
    with Sherman being 20/67.  Sherman outrushed Pittsburgh, who was 17/66,
    with Foster being 9/52.  Brister was 12/25 for 190, 2 TDs, 1 int and
    was sacked 3/30.  Green was 8/58, Hoge was 4/32.  McMahon was 22/31,
    286 yards, 1 Int, 0 TDs and sacked 1/7.  Green was 6/114, Barnett 6/42,
    Byars 4/81, Sherman 4/27 and Jackson 2/22.  Philly had 279 total yds,
    Pitt had 160.
    
    John
35.216Offense was tough for 15 minutesSHALOT::HUNTRumblin', bumblin', stumblin' ...Mon Sep 23 1991 14:1112
35.217Cleveland cut Roy Green. Great personnel move there.SHALOT::MEDVIDI'll find myself as I go homeMon Sep 23 1991 14:1434
    All kidding aside about replacing Brister with Ed McMahon, I just have
    to believe that the Steelers aren't coached well...and it's not just
    Joe Walton.
    
    Yesterday's offense was like night and day between the two halves.  The
    Steelers moved the ball very well in the first half and took a lead
    into the locker room.  Then they just stalled in the second half.  I
    don't recall Brister completing a pass to a WR all game.  How can you
    not exploit the fact that the Philly D adjusted to Big Green in the
    second half?  Receivers had to be open somewhere?  The Eagle pass rush
    was not as rough as it was on Dallas, but Brister got way too flustered
    and left his pocket prematurely.
    
    On defense, the theme for this season seems to be jumping offside on
    third down.  Unbelievable!  That's just bad coaching and lack of mental
    discipline.  They did get ripped off a couple times by a no replay
    reversal on bad official calls (a one foot inbounds catch that wasn't
    even reviewed, and a fumble on 3rd and goal that was given back to the
    Eagles), but those are no excuses for giving up the points.  Good teams
    overcome bad calls.
    
    The only coaching bright spot up until yesterday was special teams, but
    after losing Woodson, that too looked a bit sour.
    
    Jerry Olsavsky continues to impress with heady plays and wreckless
    abandon, but I did notice his size tends to get him knocked on his butt
    a lot during misdirection plays.
    
    Chuck Noll is still one of the greatest coaches in the game, but I
    gotta believe he needs to chew some duppa on his staff.  The Steelers
    don't have a great team, but they can certainly play better than
    yesterday's exhibition.
    
    	--dan'l
35.218Richardson down for a whileCELTIK::JACOBMe&amp;MySolarPanelInColoradoSpringsTue Sep 24 1991 18:056
    The Steelers first round draftee this year, Huey Richardson, was to
    undergo arthroscopic knee surgery yesterday in Atlanta.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.219GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreWed Sep 25 1991 13:0015
    
    I thought the turning point of the game was the sack of Brister by
    Clyde Simmons. That caused the STeelers to keep Eric Green and block,
    taking away what was their only offensive weapon. The Steelers
    completed no passes to their WR.
    
    As far as the bad calls go, I thought the fuble near the goal line was
    debatable, but the review couldn't tell when the knee hit the ground.
    Whatever the zebras called couldn't have been reversed. The call that
    stuck in my craw was the non call on Brister for intentional grounding.
    I think it was in the second quarter when three Eagles were on top of
    him and he just threw the ball and covered up. Nice job, Bubby.
    
    Dennis
    
35.220CELTIK::JACOBMe&amp;MySolarPanelInColoradoSpringsWed Sep 25 1991 13:458
    The Steelers put QB Rick Strom on the roster to fill the slot left
    vacant when they put Huey Richardson(knee problem) on Injured reserve.
    
    Greg Lloyd signed a contract extension yesterday, also.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.221From US)less)A TodayCELTIK::JACOBFlush the John, DTN UnknownWed Sep 25 1991 18:2352
STEELER STATS (abbreviated)

Record= 2-2

Passing:
		att	comp	yds	td	int	rating
Brister		104	62	775	4	4	79.6
O'Donnell	4	1	89	1	0	118.8

Opponents	141	84	966	8	6	81.5

Receiving:
		#	Yds	Avg	Long	TD
EricGreen	17	282	16.6	49	2
Hoge		14	101	7.2	16	1
Lipps		11	129	11.7	24	0
Stone		7	155	22.1	89*	1
Foster		5	667	13.4	31	0

Opponents	84	966	11.5	53	8

Rushing
		Att	Yds	Avg	Long	Td
Foster		49	283	5.8	56*	1
Hoge		36	101	2.8	11	1
(Rest of Steeler rushing not listed in US(less)A Today)

Opponent	128	466	4.2	33	2

Interceptions:
Hinkle, 1-57yds, Everett 1-27 yds, Griffin 1-22 yds. 3 others not listed in
US(less)A Today

Sacks:

Lloyd 3, J.Williams 2, Willis 2, Evans 1, Jones 1.
Opponents=8

Kicking:
		PAT/Att	FG/Att	Long FG		Points
Anderson	10/10	8/9	49	34

Punting:
		#	Yds	Long	Avg	TB	BLK
Stryzinski	19	746	50	39.3	1	0

Fumbles:

Brister 1, Foster 2, E.Green 2, Hoge 2, Woodson 1

JaKe

35.222CELTIK::JACOBMummifiedManInAustriaIsJimmyHoffaFri Sep 27 1991 13:329
    Steeler RB TimWorley, on Injured reserve for abscence of brain...er...I
    Mean.. a knee injury, was arrested for driving under the influence late
    Wednesday.
    
    $Set mode/voice=Mr. Rogers
    Hey Tim, can you say "unemployment line"?????
    
    JaKe
    
35.223whither steelhead club?HBAHBA::HAASMental ModelTue Oct 01 1991 19:016
Yo Dan'l

Anyword on the Steelers Club? They have a chance at indy nexted week and
inquiring minds want to know.

TTom
35.224Charlotte SteelersSHALOT::MEDVIDTalk slowly; I'm hard of thinkingTue Oct 01 1991 19:2210
    Other than the Scoreboard, you can see the Steelers in Charlotte at:
    
    	- Gold Players Sports Bar & Grill (4908 Central Ave.)
    
    	- The Graduate (Independence)
    
    The Steelers Club meets at the Gold Players Bar.
    
    See you there, maybe, huh?
    
35.225thanks, see ya thereHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelTue Oct 01 1991 20:225
Yeah, don't be surprised if a couple of stragglers show up for the Colts
game. Hell, if the Burghers win, and if we're invited back, it could
become a regular event.

TTom
35.226National Exposure of Bubby's MediocritySHALOT::MEDVIDTalk slowly; I'm hard of thinkingWed Oct 02 1991 11:2610
    TTom,
    
    the game is this Sunday at 7:00.  Don't know what kind of crowd we'll
    have since it's available on cable.  In fact, the next two games are on
    national TV because the Steelers play the Giants on Monday night the
    following week.  Dread.
    
    Send me mail toward the end of the week if'n yer plannin' on goin'.
    
    	--dan'l
35.227CELTIK::JACOBYou Trying to make ME sick????Wed Oct 02 1991 12:377
   --dan'l
    
    Are you sure it's 7, I thought it was at eight, EST.  That's the normal
    TNT Sunday night time.
    
    JaKe
    
35.228What time is kickoff?SHALOT::MEDVIDTalk slowly; I'm hard of thinkingWed Oct 02 1991 16:198
    Well, I've got two times according to two sources:
    
    	- SI NFL Preview issue has the game listed at 7:00
    
    	- Steelers Digest has the game listed at 8:00
    
    Who can confirm?
    
35.229CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodWed Oct 02 1991 16:215
My schedule card lists this as a TNT game Sunday game.  Those are at 8pm.

I will try to cofirm a little more firmly tomorrow....

'Saw
35.230CELTIK::JACOBYou Trying to make ME sick????Wed Oct 02 1991 16:544
    US(eless)A Today lists the game as 8pm est.
    
    JaKe
    
35.231GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreWed Oct 02 1991 16:556
    
    Both guides are correct. The SI guide lists the games at local time,
    which for Indy is Central. The game will be at 8 pm Eastern time.
    
    Dennis
    
35.232At their best they're averageSHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneMon Oct 07 1991 12:2410
    The Steelers struggled early against the winless Colts and then came on
    in the second half to win 21-3.  Not very impressive...special teams,
    linebackers, Barry Foster (even though he fumbled at the goal line),
    and Joe not picking his nose once on national TV were the only bright
    spots.
    
    The scarey thing is, one good shot on Warren Moon and Pittsburgh might
    win the AFC Central.  
    
    	--dan'l
35.233CELTIK::JACOBkweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbweMon Oct 07 1991 12:3510
    The Steelers couldn't do sh!t in the first half, even with Brister
    going 6-9, 80+ yards, but two of those 3 misses were completed to Colts
    defenders.
    
    Brister did have a good second half, hitting on 8 of 8 for 100+ yards,
    finishing up 14-17, with 180+ yards, and 2 TD's. One on a perfect pass
    to Eric Green, and the second on a pass and run play to Barry Foster.
    
    JaKe
    
35.234SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Oct 07 1991 14:2514
    
    	What is really scary is that the Steeler's "rolled" it up
    bigtime on a WFL team.  I mean, the Colts are nothing better than
    a expansion team right now and the Steeler's still had a hard time.
    
    	Next week will be a real test...a playoff team!  I'm still not
    impressed in the least.  If they can manage to beat the Giants, maybe
    there is some hope.  The only real ray of hope is that the Steelers
    may well have the best TE in the NFL.  If Green were playing for a
    team that threw him the ball, he'd already have the "all-world" tag.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.235Central could get swept this week but the Benges may winMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Oct 07 1991 15:5910
    THe Giants are attempting to get over .500 and just pitt stands in
    there way, not to mention that there 3 games out of first with wash
    playing against clevland at home...This is a must win for NY seeing
    that wash will no doubt be 7-0.  Sorry pitt.. Houston on the other
    hand gets to play the Jets...Of course if they can lose to NE they
    could lose to anybody...Look for the Steelters/Oilers/Browns to all
    lose the the DAMN Bengals get there first win against my Boys...Boo
    I wish cinncy had won this week...I hate seeing them winless going
    into dallas...
    
35.236CELTIK::JACOBDIHMon Oct 07 1991 16:028
    The Steelers, most likely, will get beat this week when they play the
    Gnats, but I don't think Cincy will beat Dallass.   My question is how
    long will the Cincy Mgmt go before doing the "Ron Meyers" dance on
    Wicky-Wacky-Wyches forehaid????
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.237I gots to knowCELTIK::JACOBDIHMon Oct 07 1991 17:117
    Could somebody Pulease enter the team and individual stats from lasted
    nights Steeler-Dolt game.
    
    Mucho appreciation in advanco
    
    JaKe
    
35.238COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Oct 07 1991 19:097
      I think all the AFC central will lose next week. The only team that
    stands a chance at winning is the oilers.  the jets are playing good
    ball,  and if they don't choke in the 4th,  they might win it.
    
      A 8-8 season will win this division,  whomever it might be.
    
    	Tim
35.239CELTIK::JACOBDIHTue Oct 08 1991 15:4513
    AT what point did Brister get hurt Sunday??
    
    I couldn't hear the TNT announcers 'cause of the noise in the bar but
    I thought it uncharacteristic of Noll to take Brister out and put
    O'donnell in whilst the Steelers had a 21-3 lead.  Noll almost NEVER
    relieves a QB unless there is a lead/deficit of 100 points or more.
    
    Then today, I read in USelessA Today that Brister is listed as probable
    for the Monday night Gnats game, with an injured knee.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.240COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Oct 08 1991 20:344
      The Stellers will be no different of a team.  o'donnell will choke
    under the pass ruch of jints just the same as BB.
    
    	Tim
35.241CELTIK::JACOBWed Oct 09 1991 16:468
    USelessA TODAY reports that an MRI scan yesterday revealed that Brister
    sprained ligaments in his left knee in the Dolts game.
    
    Brister is now listed as questionable for the Gnats game Monday night.
    Neil O'Donnell will start if Brister is unable to go.
    
    JaKe
    
35.242SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Oct 09 1991 18:3019
    
    	re: brister out
    
    	Maybe this could be a blessing in disguise??  Why can't the
    Steeler's be on the other side of the coin when a player off the bench
    comes in to play the game of his life?  Why is it that they are always
    victimized by others doing the same thing?  
    
    	For me, I hope O'Donnell gets the start.  I think the Steeler's
    have wasted enough time with Bubby.  If O'Donnell plays well, maybe
    we'll see a return to the days of Hanratty-Gilliam-Bradshaw when
    all three were constantly jerked in and out of games if they didn't
    produce.
    
    	Maybe a change of scenery will do the Steeler's some good.
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.243CELTIK::JACOBWed Oct 09 1991 19:0936
    >>	Maybe this could be a blessing in disguise??  Why can't the
    >>Steeler's be on the other side of the coin when a player off the bench
    >>comes in to play the game of his life?  Why is it that they are always
    >>victimized by others doing the same thing?  
    
    I agree, see one Cody #$%&@$% Carlson lasted year in the final game of
    the year.
    
    >>have wasted enough time with Bubby.  If O'Donnell plays well, maybe
    >>we'll see a return to the days of Hanratty-Gilliam-Bradshaw when
    >>all three were constantly jerked in and out of games if they didn't
    >>produce.
                   
    I dunno if that would be too good of a thing to happen.  In the early
    Emperor Noll days, he jumped ship on QB's at the drop of a hat, and had
    little success with it.  One thing that I feel when it comes to a team
    and QB, consistency.  If a team is continually jumping from one QB to
    another, I can't see where they can do ANY good whatsoever.  Unless
    both QB's ALWAYS get the same amount of practice time, AND game playing
    time.  A qb can p[ractice all they want, but unonce they get into the
    game and face REAL defenses, it don't mean sh!t!!
    
    Brister isn't the best QB in the league, by the same token, he isn't
    the worst either.  He's a known quantity.  Tons of potential, but only
    mediocre results.  Part of this blame has to go on the "O" line.
    I don't recall Brister ever having much time to throw when the Steelers
    play a decent defense.  When he has time, like he did SUnday .vs. the
    Colts, he had a good day, though, mistakes on part of the offense left
    them trailing at the half.
    
    I'd like to see O'Donnell play just to see if what he showed in
    pre-season is real or not.
    
    
    JaKE
    
35.244O'Donnell should win starting spot after thisSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 03:0324
    Well, about 15 hours ago I wrote in the Browns note that good teams
    overcome poor officiating.  The Steelers proved they were a good team
    during MNF last night.  For those of you who went to bed or had the
    Pittsburgh offense lull you to sleep, you missed a great finish.
    
    Brister was benched in the third quarter and Neil O'Donnell (yes, it's
    time to start using his proper name [even though Gifford called him
    O'Donald once]) brought the Steelers back to tie the game at 20-20 with
    a minute left.  Matt Bahr kicked the game winning field goal with nine
    seconds in the game.
    
    One can only wonder what the outcome would have been if:
    
    	- The officials would have thrown a flag on the obvious pass
    	  interference on Hoge during the second quarter.  Instead, the
    	  ball was intercepted and the Giants picked up a field goal.
    
    	- O'Donnell had played the entire game.
    
    The Steelers didn't win, but to come rouring back like that against a
    solid opponent tells me that they've got a better team than I had given
    them credit for.
    
    	--dan'l
35.245CAM::WAYParty on, GarthTue Oct 15 1991 10:0529
I can only believe that the Steelers resurgence was a case of utterly
poor coaching on the Giants part.  The Steelers executed VERY well, and
it's probably no coincicdence all of the major pass plays were made by 
the receiver being covered by Gary Reasons.

Parcells would NEVER have let that comeback happen.  Whenever his team
was ahead he was always riding them, cautioning them against celebrating
before the final gun.  Handley and Groh (Tweedledee and Tweedledum)
have no such control.

This was a classic case of a team sitting on a lead and trying to ease
on into the lockerroom with a W.   How important now looms the Megget
30 yard TD run.


Personally, I'm very glad Pittsburgh pushed it, and made a game out of
it.  Maybe it will send a wakeup call to the Giants coaching staff (average
IQ about 5 degrees below room temp).

This Giants team reminded me of the Giants teams of the late 70s early
80s  --  watching a sieve like prevent defense trying to prevent the
inevitable....


I'd like to be in Pittsburgh this week to see what happens with the QB
situation.....


'Saw
35.246HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Oct 15 1991 10:253
       WOW! I went to bed about 11:45. The Steelers had no chance.
    Obviously JoJ has been right all these years. Joe Walton IS a genius!
                                             Denny
35.247Sure wish we'd have some inter-divisional games allreadySNDCSL::HAUSRATHRockin' in the Free WorldTue Oct 15 1991 11:3215
    
    Shoe's on the other foot now, Dan'l.  If you consider overcoming
    poor officiating LOOSING, then I guess that's your opinion.  
    
    The Browns had a similiar second half comeback against the 
    Giants (at the Giants), so I see a trend with this years Giants team.
    This Giants team is not playing anywhere near the level they were
    playing at last year, so I don't consider a close-but-no-cigar
    performance at home against them as an indication of anything.   
       
    The bottom line is the Steelers are 3-3, 2 games back of the Oilers.  
    At least Noll finally woke up and smelled the fresh brewed coffee about 
    Bubby.  
    
    /Jeff
35.248May Brister Ride the Bench, EternallyCELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 12:0219
    I, for one, was happy to see Brister get some bench splinters in his
    butt in the second half.  
    
    Sheez, I wish I were back in the 'Burgh this week to witness the
    outcries on Myron Cope's radio show for Brister to get his walking
    papers.
    
    'Saw, I partially agree with ya on the Gnats letting up, BUT, you have
    to give O'Donnell credit.  Almost every pass he threw was right on the
    money, and thrown with authority.  Something we Pittsburghers haven't
    seen out of Brister very often.  With Brister in the same situations
    that O'Donnell was in, the Steelers would have probably just been
    intercepted 2 or 3 times.
    
    Does anybody have the stats on the game(especially Brister's and
    O'Donnell's)??????????????Could somebody post them here, PUULLLEEASE!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.249Personally I think it was the QB out-of-the-pocket optionANGLIN::KIRKMANWhat a WONDERFUL honeymoonTue Oct 15 1991 12:0431
    re:244
    
    I watched that play (the pass interference non-call) and all the
    replays.  I agreed with the call, and there were several points that
    the game anouncers ignored.
    
    	- Once the QB leaves the pocket, the defender can legally disrupt
    	  the pass route, as long as the pass is not in the air.  This rule
    	  is an outgrowth of the QB-rollout pass-run-option play. 
    	  Otherwise the defender has no way of protecting himself from the
    	  reciever blocking on the run option.
    	  Brister was definitly out of the pocket on this play.
    
    	- It looked like the Saftey was in a possition to make the int
    	  anyway.  The refs may have decided the pass was not catchable for
    	  that reason.
    
    	- A (very weak) case could be made for Offensive pass interference. 
    	  After all, the Steeler reciever did collide with a nearly
    	  stationary Giant defender.
    
    Note: This play was reviewed TWICE by instant replay.  (The Steelers
    took a timeout to give every opportunity.) There must have been some
    rule allowing it that the announcers were not aware of.
    
    Commander Scott
    
    P.S.  The Giants should have blown the game open in the 1st half and
    didn't.  Then there wouldn't have been a comeback. The Steelers managed
    only 1 first down in the 1st half, yet the Giants could only manage a
    13-0 lead.
35.250CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 12:1235
    
    >>	- Once the QB leaves the pocket, the defender can legally disrupt
    >>	  the pass route, as long as the pass is not in the air.  This rule
    >>	  is an outgrowth of the QB-rollout pass-run-option play. 
    >>	  Otherwise the defender has no way of protecting himself from the
    >>	  reciever blocking on the run option.
    >>	  Brister was definitly out of the pocket on this play.
    
    Granted, Brister may have been out of the pocket, BUT, Hoge was slammed
    with the ball in the air, not while Brister was on the move.
    
    >>	- It looked like the Saftey was in a possition to make the int
    >>	  anyway.  The refs may have decided the pass was not catchable for
    >>	  that reason.
    
    Hoge would have been in position to break up the interception had he
    not been knocked down.
    
    >>    - A (very weak) case could be made for Offensive pass interference. 
    >>	  After all, the Steeler reciever did collide with a nearly
    >>	  stationary Giant defender.
    
    Oh please stop, this is one of the funniest things I've read all
    morning.  The defender was about as "nearly stationary" as the people
    in the fast lane on I-495 are "nearly stationary" every morning(at
    75+mph).  Hoge was interfered with, CLEARLY, and the officials on the
    field BLEW the call.  But that one call wasn't the problem with the
    Steelers losing, it was the rancid play of the offense in the first
    half.
    
    BTW, as far as I know, there are no provisions for CALLING a penalty
    from the replay booth.
    
    JaKe
    
35.251Neil! Neil! Neil!SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 12:1814
    All your reasons are null, I belive, Scott, because the ball was in the
    air when Hoge was hit.  The receiver must be given a chance to catch
    the ball.
    
    As far as the "shoe being on the other foot," what I was pointing out
    was that the Browns get blown out and Whitehair (et. al.) are in here
    blowing steam about how they were jobbed by the refs.  But a good team
    overcomes bad calls.  The Steelers overcame that call; the Browns never
    overcame the officials.  By my reasoning, Steelers are good, Browns are
    not.
    
    Good teams do lose.  Bad teams lose a lot.
    
    	--dan'l
35.252CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 12:2820
    --dan'l, I ain't trying to dispute anything you're saying, BUT, I ,
    personally, am certainly not ready to call the Steelers a "GOOD TEAM",
    after only 20 minutes of brilliance lasted night.  Sure, they looked
    GREAT in the comeback, but I need another 2 or 3 wins in a row to be
    able to hang the "GOOD" label on them.
    
    I do, however, think that O'Donnell should be given a start nexted
    week, .vs. the Seattle ocean pigeons, but knowing Noll's ways, Brister
    will probably be back in there, unfortunately.
    
    IMHO, O'Donnell didn't show the nervous feet that Brister has never
    gotten rid of.  He hung in the pocket, moved up when he had to, and his
    scramble to the Giants 5 set up the 2nd Steeler TD.  
    
    My prediction:  Brister will be bench warming regularly within the next
    year to year and a half.  O'Donnell, barring injury, will get to show
    his stuff from a starting position.
    
    JaKe
    
35.253Big difference in level of competition.. wait and seeSNDCSL::HAUSRATHRockin' in the Free WorldTue Oct 15 1991 12:4214
    
    There is a LOAD of difference between the Redskins and the Giants.  
    If you can't see that Dan'l then then you are blind.  The Steelers and
    the Browns both lost to the Giants by 3 points.  The Browns, however,
    lost in Giants stadium, not at home.   I don't think any comparison can
    be made between the two teams until they square off against each other. 
    
    The Steelers are not bad, however, I don't consider the Browns to be
    bad either.  I consider both teams to be average, and I think they'll 
    both finish about .500 this year.  Too bad neither is good enough to 
    take Houston outta the top spot.  A perfect 0-fer record is a terrible
    thing to waste.  
    
    /Jeff
35.254CAM::WAYParty on, GarthTue Oct 15 1991 12:4630
As for as O'Donnell, he wasn't facing much of a pass rush.  And the run
was working because of the STOOOPPPPPIIIIIDDDDD Prevent Defense.

I do not understand why the Groh (Giants Def Coord) did not just go
with what had been working.  Instead of rushing two guys and an LB,
why not continue with the pressure on the QB.  Instead, he gave Pittsburgh
TIME to find those receivers, most often in one on one coverage with
Reasons.


As to the Interference call, yeah, could've been.  It's not a reviewable
call, btw.  The ball seemed awfully far away, but then again, the
receiver never got there ;^)  


The Giants: 

Yes, this team is NOT the same team from last year, in terms of intensity.
The Giants have never been a "blow you out" team, but this year instead
of edging the others, the others have been edging them.

I don't know if Handley is capable of coaching this team, only time will
tell.  I feel it's a coach's job to motivate, and he doesn't (probably
because he's about as dynamic as a wet dishrag) so we differ substantially
on that view.

I see this game as a win, but NOT a victory.....


'Saw
35.255SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Oct 15 1991 14:3341
    
    
    	First of all, the Steelers stink.  Yes, I am a fan of the Steeler's
    but they did stink for 3/4 of the game.  
    
    	Secondly, I was glad, rather elated that O'Donnell was finally
    given a chance.  Bubby's been around for 4 years now and really hasn't
    done much to improve.  I've gotta ask, how long do we have to wait for
    him to get it in gear?  O'Donnell deserves a shot and he got a good
    shot last night.
    
    	Yes, I felt the Giants let up a little, but the comment about 
    O'Donnell not getting any pass rush is way out of line.  Taylor was
    blitzing on almost every down and I curious as to why our announcers
    weren't trying to develop that point more because on Pittsburgh's
    first scoring drive, they let LT come and just ran inside of him.
    If you can blame anyone on the Giants, you don't have to look much
    further than LT.  He played a great game, but in the 4th, he gambled
    way to much and the Steeler's finally ran to him.
    
    	I've also got to wonder why it took almost 3 whole quarters before
    they got the ball to Green?  Here's one of the best TE's in the league
    and they don't throw to him at all for nearly 3 quarters.  When they
    do throw to him, he is like a Mack truck and ends up catching a TD to
    tie the game.
    
    	In general, Bubby panics way to much in the pocket and gives up
    to soon.  On the other hand, O'Donnell stood in there longer which
    gave his receivers some more time to get open and he delivered the
    ball with a lot of accuracy.  The TD to Lipps was a perfect throw as
    was the throw to Green.  The throw to Green spilt two defenders and
    the throw to Lipps was placed perfectly over the reach of the defender.
    
    	All this isn't saying that O'Donnell is the man now because of 
    one quarter of heroics, but after 4 years of watching Bubby bumble
    around, I'm ready to give this kid a chance to see what he can do.
    We already know what Bubby can('t) do, so let's see what this kid
    can do.
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.256NY-Pitt statsBSS::JCOTANCHSeachickens &amp; Blue Jays are Chokers!Tue Oct 15 1991 14:3754
NY Giants      7   6   7   3 - 23
Pittsburgh     0   0   3  17 - 20

                      NY      Pit
First downs           17      20
Rushing               10       9
Passing                7      11
Penalty                0       0
3rd-down eff.        9-17    2-10
4th-down eff.        0-0      0-0
Total yds.           311      377
Total plays           65      57
Net rushing yds.     197      148
Rushes                38      18
Avg per rush         5.2      8.2
Net passing yds.     114      229
Completed-Att.      14-25    17-37
Yards-pass-play      4.2      5.9
Sacked-yds lost      2-2      2-20
Punts-avg.           6-41     6-41
Return yards         85       144
Punts-returns        0-0      4-29
Kickoffs-returns     4-68    6-115
Ints.                1-17     0-0
Penalties-yds.       1-10     9-65
Fumbles-lost         0-0      2-0
Time of poss.       36:17    23:43


Individual Stats

Rushing:
NY - Hampton 25-96, Hostetler 6-48, Meggett 3-44, Carthon 2-7, Tillmsn 2-2  
Pitt - Hoge 8-73, Foster 7-60, O'Donnell 2-13, Brister 1-2

Passing:
NY - Hostetler 14-25-0-116
Pitt - Brister 6-16-1-97, O'Donnell 11-21-0-152

Receiving:
NY - Meggett 4-34, Carthon 3-15, Turner 2-21, Cross 2-20, McCaffrey 2-20,
Ingram 1-6
Pitt - Lips 5-64, Green 4-58, Hoge 3-18, Stone 2-78, Graham 1-15, 
Thompson 1-9, Mularkey 1-7


Interceptions: 
NY - Collins
Pitt - None

Missed FG's:
NY - None
Pitt - None

35.257CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 14:467
    re.256
    
    Thanks, Joe
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.258Green>>JacksonCHIEFF::CHILDSInthehotredlightofablack&amp;white ROSESGROWTue Oct 15 1991 14:519
 Hey Jeff, what's the world of difference between the Giants and the Skins?
 Skins have had a cakewalk of schedule so far. Lions without Sanders, Eagles
 with no-QB and gift wrapped and hand delievered win from the Vitalsis man
 down in ERVINE...Bears have no o and the rest of the teams are stumble
 bums. Wait two weeks you'll see when the STREAK reaches 7.....

 mike    

35.259Now that I've calmed down...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 15:3619
    Yeah, OK, I need to apologize to Jeff and JaKe.  I just got caught up
    in the Steelers looking good for a quarter.  One game does not a good
    team make, let alone one quarter.  (At the same time, calling the
    Steelers "good" was a relative comparison to the Browns, not to the
    rest of the NFL.)
    
    I fall back on my old prediction that both the Browns and Steelers will
    finish at .500 this year.  And what was Hal's prediction?
    
    But I gotta believe that O'Donnell is the Steelers' future.  I backed
    Bubby for so long while others were maligning him.  I argued in his
    favor for four years.  And even during the preseason when Steelers fans
    were yelling, "Bench Brister and start Doug MacDoogel," I still claimed
    Brister was the man.  All that changed over the last few games and
    culminated last night.  Brister can't move the offense.  O'Donnell can. 
    O'Donnell will have his share of bad games and rocky starts, but I say
    hand him the reins come Wednesday's practice.
    
    	--dan'l
35.260FIX!HAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersTue Oct 15 1991 16:071
    Giants let up so Pittsburgh could beat the spread!
35.261SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Oct 15 1991 16:1420
    
    
    	I'm also a little surprised that no one mentioned the celebration
    penalty that cost the Steeler's 5 yards on the kickoff which was 
    subsequently kicked out of bounds, thus giving the Giants the ball
    at the 40.  That was huge and I hope Eric Green has learned a lesson
    though his celebration dance..
    
    	I will say this about the Giants and that is if last night was
    any indication of the Giants play then they should be glad that they
    have a backup.  Hostetler (sp) was on the run all night and I believe
    he ran for 4 firstdowns including the one that set up the winning
    field goal.  He took a pretty good pounding, but the fact that he
    had to run so much doesn't say a whole lot for the offensive line.
    Hostetler is a gutty guy, but if has to keep running to keep the
    offense moving, Simms entrance might not be to far off.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.262CAM::WAYParty on, GarthTue Oct 15 1991 16:1628
If you look back at the prevent that NY plays, they're usually rushing
two down lineman, and an LB, who 99% of the time happens to be LT.

O'Donnell didn't have as much pressure late, as Brister did early, because
the damn Giants were trying to "prevent" exactly what happened.

LT was playing pass.  The entire Giants defense was playing pass.  Why?
Because that's the way Twiddledum Groh wanted it.  Also, the one slight
defense you have against LT is to run at him, which Pittsburgh did well.


Green wasn't open much early on because the Giants were covering him
with people who are good at that (CBs) and not the LB on the Giants who's
best against the run (Reasons).

Bubby *was* tentative, and O'Donnell wasn't, but the kid is not the second
coming of Christ either.

I still say that if Tweedledum Groh has the Giants playing basic defense
instead of prevent, the Steelers don't get back into the game....


btw, regarding the PI non-call, I feel it was fairly well offset by
Cashion's "i'm looking right at it, he's taken three steps but I'm 
not gonna call" Roughing the Passer non-call.....


'Saw
35.263CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 16:5314
    I gotta question.
    
    The Steelers got hit with the celebration(bogus A$$ rule, IMHO) and
    were penalized 5 yards on the kick-off, thus making them kick from the
    30, instead of the 35.  Anderson's kick goes out of bounds, ball should
    be spotted at the 35, but they put the ball at the 40 yd line.  Thus,
    the Steelers get penalized TWICE for the infraction, right????
    
    If Anderson had kicked the ball into the end zone, would they have
    spotted the ball at the 25?????  I think the refs screwed that one up. 
    But then again, I could be wrong, but it'd be the first time.
    
    JaKe
    
35.264SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 15 1991 16:551
    Isn't there a 5 yard penalty for kicking the ball out of bounds?
35.265CAM::WAYParty on, GarthTue Oct 15 1991 17:0411
It would depend on how the Kickoff OB rule is written.

A team has a choice of kick over or at the 35.

Now, if the "at the 35" part is ABSOLUTE, then there was a mistake.

If, however, that part of the rule is written "or at a spot x yards from
the spot of kickoff" then they are correct....


'Saw
35.266Steelers almost pulled a Raiders!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOEven so, come, Lord Jesus.Tue Oct 15 1991 17:1513
    Looking through the replies I see that most think the Steelers stunk
    up the place in the first half, but I gotta dis-agree, the Steelers
    defense played well through-out the game (IMHO), but especially
    in the second half when the offense woke up. Once the offense did
    start scoring the defense clamped down and stopped the Giants from
    returning the favor. O'Donnell has been getting the hero treatment
    in here but the real heroes were on defense. Incidently, I wonder
    what you guys think about Noll's decision to kick one of the first
    two field goals when they had a chance to score a TD, and change
    the whole outcome of the game, I remember thinking that they shoulda
    gone for it.
    
    Carlos
35.267Moral Victory...kind ofSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 17:3019
    Carlos, you are right about the Steelers D, but they did give up some
    key 3rd downs during the entire game.
    
    Regarding the first field goal, that's Noll.  He takes points when he
    can get them.  With the way Brister and the O tend to shut down inside
    the 20, I didn't disagree with kicking a field goal on 4th and goal
    even though they were down by 20 points.  And look what happened!  By
    taking the sure thing, the Steelers ultimately ended up in a position
    to send the game into OT.  
    
    Somebody like Sam Wyche goes for it on 4th and goal.  That's why Noll
    is still one of the masters and Sam is on the ropes.  Subtle confidence
    will win more games than trickery.
    
    Maybe there is something to this excellent loss thingie.  Steelers will
    be a better team because of last night's game and good coaching
    decisions...maybe.
    
    	--dan'l
35.268Word To Your Mother Bubby.... You Stink !!QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football, Feel The ThunderTue Oct 15 1991 17:4010
     Well,
    
     I was really sorry to see the Squeelers lose that game last night.
    I thought that their defense played extremly well and that Doug
    McDoogle guy came on strong at QB in the second half.  I was screaming
    at the TV for them to bench BOOBY after the second series I can't
    stand him or his mother.  At any rate....  I say give the young guy
    a shot, he can't possibly screw it up any worse than BUBBA....
    
    Big Game
35.269Plus, they'll bring their Ref's with them ;-)SNDCSL::HAUSRATHRockin' in the Free WorldTue Oct 15 1991 17:4316
    
    Mike, your argument would hold up if the Redskins had been simply
    "getting by" their opponents..(ala Giants)  Their victories however, 
    have been of the total domination variety.  It took a trick play to
    score points for the first time in RFK against their defense.  
    They marched with EASE against the previous top ranked defense in the 
    AFC and scored 42 points.  They have a proven winner for a coach and
    are stocked with veterans.  Bill Parcels saw the writting on the wall 
    and took a hike.  The Giants might have been the better team last year,
    but I haven't seen anything this year to indicate ANY team in the league 
    is playing at the Redskins level this year.  
    
    I'll be amazed if the Giants can stay within 10 points of the Redskins 
    when they meet, provided the Redskins stay as hot as they are now. 
    
    /Jeff   
35.270SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Oct 15 1991 17:5121
    
    	I haven't heard anyone in here stating that O'Donnell is the
    second coming.  What I have heard are some people including me 
    stating that Bubby has had 4 years at the starting position with
    little to show for it.  We believe that it is time to make a change,
    or at least give his backup a shot.  It is clear that Brister has 
    had big problems with Walton's offense.  Maybe it is one of those 
    things were O'Donnell is better suited to execute his offense.
    
    	That celebration penalty really killed the Steelers along with
    Anderson kicking the ball out of bounds.  If the Giants would of
    started on the 30, the outcome might of been different.
    
    	Anyway, as a Steeler fan, I will welcome a change at QB. I've
    sat through Cliff Stout, Mark Malone and now Bubby Brister.  All 
    these guys were supposed to have the tools, but none never produced.
    How long should a team wait until they make a change?
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.271CAM::WAYParty on, GarthTue Oct 15 1991 18:249
I'll say this:

	Brister should not have been playing.  It's obvious to me
	that at the very least O'Donnell looks very capable, and
	why put a QB with a very chancy knee in there when you
	could have pulled the kid in from the opening kickoff....


'Saw
35.272CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 18:3119
    'Saw,
    
    I agree that Brister shouldn't have been playing.  I also think he
    should get to sit on his plate stacker for the next game, at least,
    whilst O'Donnell, who is 100% helathy, gets a crack at running the
    Steelers "O".  As has been stated by others, Brister has had 4 years,
    and, while showing some improvement, is is clearly evident that
    barring an act of God, he'll never take the Steelers to the Super Bowl.
    I've sat thru not only Stoudt, Malone and Brister, but the good years
    AND bad years of Bradshaw, Hanratty and, Gilliam, who would've been one
    helluva QB if he could've kept the needle out of his arm, plus Bill
    Nelson before them and a long line of others, whose names escape me as
    of this writing.
    
    Give O'Donnell the chance to make Brister just a memory.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.273Yet Another ACC QBSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Tue Oct 15 1991 18:446
    Neil O'Donnell, you say ???    Quarterbacking an NFL team, you say ???
    
    Hmmm, very interesting.   Wonder what collegiate football conference he
    came from ...
    
    Bob Hunt
35.274My 2 centsWARIOR::QUINN_RTue Oct 15 1991 20:5119
    
    I agree with giving O'Donnell a solid shot at the job.  It has been
    Noll's penchant to go with the veterans whether or not the younger
    player appears to prove himself in practice or preseason. That has been
    proven in more than one position.  RB -- Barry Foster still doesn't get
    enough carries but it took him two great preseasons and a Tim Worley
    injury to play.  Hoge is a good tough runner but there are times where
    he simply shouldn't be in as the single back on second or third with
    7-8-9-10yds to go.  That should be Barry Foster territory.  They
    drafted to young wideouts who still seldom get in until garbage time. 
    I believe that Eric Green was quite lucky that the  Steelers didn't
    have a tight ends other than Mularky that Knoll had faith in when he
    joined the team.  At some point he has to put production over
    potential when a player has had his opportunity to prove his worth.
    
    Seattles no push over but this steeler team should really be ready to
    redeem themselves after last night.
    
    Roy L.
35.275CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatWed Oct 16 1991 14:067
    US(eless)A TODAY says that Brister has a torn knee ligament and will,
    most likely ride the bench .vs. the Seattle Ocean Pidgeons this Sunday.
    
    Miracles never cease!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.276CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatWed Oct 16 1991 14:127
    The Steelers are 9th in the AFC in team offense moving an average 
    of 306.7 yds per game.
    
    They are 7th in the AFC in team defense, giving up an average of 311
    yards a game.(
    
    JaKe
35.277SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Oct 16 1991 14:2818
    
    	The interesting thing about the Steeler's this year is that they
    do have some po-tential.  When I thought about it, they have Green 
    who is in his second year and looks like he could be a great TE.  They
    have Foster who is either in his 2nd or 3rd year and it appears that
    he could have a bright future.  The secondary is also pretty young with
    some 2nd and 3rd year players.  With the addition of O'Donnell at
    QB, he too is a 2nd year player.   If they are building on the future,
    these people could fit the bill.  They are all young and hungry for
    time and attention.  Not to mention that there are some young WR's
    too.
    
    	With a defensive lineman pick, this team could be poised to gel
    in a couple of years if a QB ever decides to take over.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.278CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatWed Oct 16 1991 14:356
    FWIW, Foster is in his 2nd year and Eric Green is in his 3rd year.
    
   
    JaKe
    
    
35.279BSS::JCOTANCHGo Air Force - Stun the Irish!Wed Oct 16 1991 14:384
    Seachokes waived Kemp yesterday.  I thought I heard Krieg is ready to
    play again.
    
    Joe
35.280RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Sons of Katie ElderWed Oct 16 1991 14:4410
    It was nice to see Keith Willis still playing for the Steelers.  He's a
    great guy (went to Northeastern...)  I was also happy to see his 55 1/2
    career sacks rank him 3rd on the all-time Steeler list behind L.C. and
    Mean Joe.
    
    go Keith!
    
    
    
    HD
35.281SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Oct 16 1991 14:4910
    
    re: Jake
    
    	Don't you have that backwards?  Green was a rookie last year while
    Foster was in his second year.  Last year is when the Steeler's went
    a whole month with scoring a TD.  Green signs and scores a couple in
    his first game in October.
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.282CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatWed Oct 16 1991 15:0412
    Bill,
    
    Come to think of it, you may be right in regards to Green, but Foster
    is definitely a 2nd year player.  Lasted year was when he made his
    biggest rookie mistake and let the kickoff .vs. the 49ers just fall on
    the ground, and the 49ers recovered it, and subsequently scored putting
    the game out of reach.
    
    It just seems to me that Green has been around longer than 1+ years.
    
    JaKe
    
35.283PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonWed Oct 16 1991 15:2723
  Green and Foster are both 2nd year players. Foster came out of college
  at the end of his junior year. I think that, if he had stayed at
  Arkansas another year, he may have been a #1 draft. The Black and Gold
  are lucky he came out early and got him in the 4th round.    

  With regard to the Monday night game. The Steelers definately got robbed
  with the non-call pass interference against Hoge. But they overcame it
  later in the game. The penalty that really ticks me off is the one for
  celebrating in the end zone which may have cost them the win. It wasn't
  even a long or blatant celebration. I mean, what's a team supposed to do 
  when they come back from a 20-0 deficit and tie the game with 50 seconds 
  left.  This celebration rule sucks. 

  I though the defense(even the pass rush) looked good the entire game.
  There's only so much a defense can do when, for 3 quarter's, the offense
  go 3 downs and out. 

  The offense definately looked more enthused and confident with O'Donnell
  in the driver's seat. Glad to hear he'll start next week. They do have 
  some talent. I'm hoping this excellent lose will be a turning point for 
  the Black and Gold. 

				Keith
35.284CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 16 1991 15:273
    So, was Bubby pulled on Monday night because he was ineffective or
    because he was injured?  Is this injury a way for Bubby and his backers
    to save some face?
35.285CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatWed Oct 16 1991 15:4523
    re.284
    
    Noll, quoted in US(eless)A TODAY, says he "screwed up".
    
    "I made a mistake," said Noll.  "That's one of the traps you run into
    as a coach, when you go with a guy who's less than 100% when you have a
    guy on the bench who can do the job."
    
    The article says Brister had limped thru practices all week anbd also
    wore a knee brace.
    
    I think it's a combination of Brister being ineffective, and the injury
    that caused him to be pulled.   A couple of times, after Brister got
    popped, he grasped the knee, and limped more noticably afterward.
    
    FWIW, the Steeler's backup behind Neil O'Donnell is Rick Strom, who
    first played for the team during the strike year.
    
    Re Green and Foster, thanks for clearing that up, Keith.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.286DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingWed Oct 16 1991 18:317
In the paper today they said that the official made the wrong call on the 
celebration rule. it seems the NFL officials like the rule even less than the
fans so they are calling it for any celebration in hopes that the rules 
comittee will pull it for next season....

Metz
35.287Tweet !!! (I hate this rule!!!) ????SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Wed Oct 16 1991 18:3715
35.288Can you be more specific?SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadWed Oct 16 1991 18:3911
>In the paper today they said that the official made the wrong call on the 
>celebration rule. 
    
    Who is they?  
    
    How can a judgement call be called wrong?
    
    What was wrong about it; the call or penalizing the Steelers twice for
    one call?
    
    	--dan'l
35.289right next to article about Jane and Ted getting stuck in the Braves elevatorDECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingWed Oct 16 1991 18:5919
Direct from the local rag...


The chairman of the NFL's competition committee suggested that game officials 
made the wrong call on an "illegal demonstration" penalty that helped the NY 
Giants beat the Pittsburgh Steelers Monday Night.
 Jim Finks, the rules chief, also said that game officials may be making such
calls as a protest against a rule they don't like.
 The rule was invoked after the steelers scored the tyoing touchdown against the
Giants who eventually won the game 23-20.

 "What I saw was not hte intent of our rules,"sad Fink, who is also president of
the NO Saints.
 "It's a judgement call, up to the officials but my impression is that they don't
like the rule so they're going out of their way to call it to show that."


Metz
35.290AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlueWed Oct 16 1991 19:1510
    	I believe what Green did was exactly what the rule was supposed
    to prevent.  Now let me add that I think the rule stinks, but what
    the league is doing to the referees stinks.  Every time someone
    whines or complains about it the league will say the refs made a
    mistake in their interpretation of the call, making the indecision
    on the referees part whether to throw a flag or not on this "illegal
    demonstration" foul even greater.   Main these guys would make great
    Senators, dontcha think?
    
    				/Don
35.291CAM::WAYParty on, GarthWed Oct 16 1991 22:2613
Pittsburgh was NOT penalized twice for the same call.

If the ensuing kickoff had not been erroneously kicked o/b, then
the Giants probably start around the 25.

I'm still not sure of the o/b kick rule.

If the rule states:   kick again or start on 35, then the refs did it wrong.
However, if the rule is expressed as kick again or x yards from spot of kick
then NOT wrong....


'Saw
35.292FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Oct 17 1991 10:2521
    I didn't see the play and I've been next unseeing a lot of things,
    since I was at a class on Monday and Tuesday, so I don't know what
    happened.
    
    If a kickoff goes out of bounds without having been touched first by
    anyone (other than the kicker), the receiving team has at least a
    couple of options - take the ball at a point 30 yards from where the
    ball was kicked or take the ball at the point where it went out of
    bounds.  I don't know if they still have the option to force the rekick
    from 5 yards further back, but I believe they do.
    
    Most kickoffs take place from the 35.  Most kickoffs go out of bounds
    at a point inside the receiving team's 35, hence, the usual outcome is
    for the receiving team to take the ball on its 35.  The only time the
    receiving team would take the ball at the point where it went out of
    bounds would be if it went out at a point between the 35 yard lines. 
    Under the new rule, I really can't imagine very many situations where
    the receiving team would force a rekick on a kickoff out of bounds
    since most kickoff returns don't get to the 35 anyway.
    
    John
35.293FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Oct 17 1991 10:279
    And one more - there is a rarely applied rule that gives the receiving
    team the ball at a very advantageous location on the field should the
    kicking team kickoff out of bounds 3 consecutive times.  In other
    words, kickoff goes out of bounds, tack on the penalty.  Kick again,
    out of bounds again.  Kick again, out of bounds again.  I don't
    remember the spot since it happens so seldom and probably never happens
    now, given the rules change.
    
    John
35.294CAM::WAYParty on, GarthThu Oct 17 1991 10:3115
Then the Steelers were NOT penalized twice for the same call.


	1. Green gets hit with a 5 yard penalty for celebrating to
	   be enforced on the kickoff.

	2. Kickoff from 30 yard line, goes OB.

	3. Giants have option:  rekick or start 30 yards from where
	   ball kicked...  ie the 40 yard line.

No problem.


'Saw
35.295CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatThu Oct 17 1991 12:145
    Thanks for the clarification, Ninj.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.296would have been fine for anyone elseQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderThu Oct 17 1991 16:524
     I still think it was a bad call.......  Only because it favored
    the Midgets !! 
    
    		Big Game
35.297PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Thu Oct 17 1991 20:058
    US(eless)A TODAY says that although the STEELERS haven't announced that
    Neil O'Donnell will make his first NFL start, Sunday .vs. Seattle, but
    injured QB Bubby Brister said: "(Coach) Chuck (Noll) told me he wants
    me to rest my knee, so he's going with O'Donnell Sunday."
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.298Useless Stat of the DayPTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Thu Oct 17 1991 20:156
    The Steelers are 4th in the NFL in total points scored per game, and
    22nd in the league in total points per game given up.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.299DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingThu Oct 17 1991 20:438
Paper out here said that bubble will be bench bound for two weeks to rest his 
knee......

Maybe mommy will kiss it and make it better,


  Metz
35.300PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Fri Oct 18 1991 12:4434
    Mac
    
    You wondered why I call the paper the hilton gives me every day
    "US9eless)A TODAY,  I'll tell ya now.
    
    1st, the NLCS ended lasted night at about 10:30, mountain time.  The
    paper here doesn't even have a hint to what the score was.
    
    And, 1st, In one part, they list Neil O'Donnell as being the starting
    QB for the Steelers Sunday, .vs. the Seattle Ocean Pidgeons, whilst in
    another column, not 12 inches away, they list Brister as the probable
    starter, but state that he has a "Hamstring" injury., while the whole
    football world knows that the guy hjas a gimpy knee, the result of a
    torn ligament.
    
    Lasted week, before the Gnats game, they listed on 3 consecutive days,
    different knees as the injury.  First leeft, then right, then left. 
    Suprized they didn't list a middle knee injury as his problem.
    
    As a generic newspaper it's not too bad, but I think it's worth is much
    greater when paper training a puppy, than as a source for ACCURATE
    info.
    
    Sheez, they have a main section, a money section,. a sports(term used
    loosely) section, a Life section.  Maybe they need to add a
    "corrections" section, but that would double the size of the paper.
    
    =Glad I'm going home tomorrow and will get to read REAL newspapers, ie
    the Pittsburgh Press and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette!!!
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
35.301Have a fun flight back, maybe next time...COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Oct 18 1991 13:235
      Why Jake,  you couldn't possibly be refering to the Gazzette?  I hope
    you haven't wasted your time reading Ralph Rotton's column.....He is
    such a hypacrit (sp?), not to mention he doesn't have a clue.....
    
    	Tim
35.302PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Fri Oct 18 1991 13:2713
    Tim
    
    Nah, the HILTON didn't give me the Colo. Springs Gasette, just
    US(eless)A TODAY.
    
    >>            -< Have a fun flight back,  maybe next time... >-
    
    After 4 weeks in a hotel, away from the wife and little ones, I
    thoroughly look forward to tomorrow afternoon whence I arrive back in
    Pittsburgh.
    
    JaKe
    
35.303BSS::JCOTANCHGo Air Force - Stun the Irish!Fri Oct 18 1991 13:5910
    JaKe,
    
    USA Today must have different editions 'cuz I picked mine up at a 7-11
    this morning and it has a story on the game plus a complete box.
    
    BTW, it was a pleasure meeting you, glad you enjoyed yourself at the AF
    game and have a good flight back.
    
    
    Joe
35.304STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesFri Oct 18 1991 14:189
    > USA Today must have different editions 'cuz I picked mine up at a 7-11
    > this morning and it has a story on the game plus a complete box.
    
    They do.  Check the upper left corner of the front page -- it'll say
    either "Inside Sports" or "Sports Final".  "Sports Final" is the later
    version.
    
    
    py
35.305When do the hockey playoffs start?SHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsMon Oct 21 1991 15:2119
    For the record, the Steelers stunk yesterday.  Except for a beauty of a
    pass from O'Donnell to Dwight Stone for the only Pittsburgh score, I
    honestly can't remember any other play, offensive or defensive, that
    was executed well enough to even smile about.
    
    The secondary was pitiful.  The linebackers were used and abused.  The
    defensive line got close but never got to Craig.  
    
    Too many mistakes all around.  Penalty after penalty.  Tough to win
    football games like that.
    
    O'Donnell still has what it takes but had no time whatsoever to throw
    the ball yesterday.  The offensive line was pushed around like toys.
    
    Any word on the injury to Barry Foster?  What a blow that would be,
    although Warren Williams and Leroy Thomspon are quite adequate as
    backups.
    
    	--dan'l
35.306QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeMon Oct 21 1991 19:075
    I just hope that Chuck doesn't judge O'Donnell to harshly for
    this one performance.....  The Squeelers need to leave Bubby
    on the bench !!!
    
    Big Game
35.307Can't figure 27-7 at homeWARIOR::QUINN_RMon Oct 21 1991 21:4511
    
    I can't figure it.  Just when the steelers look like they are about to
    get things headed in the right direction the run into a brick wall.  I
    didn't see the game yesterday but the  10 minute ticker sure made it
    look bad.  On the little clip yesterday on primetime they only showed
    the steelers getting burned and Greg Lloyd on bunch of late hits.   Was
    the steelers offense as bad as the first half Monday night which left
    the defense on the field all game or is the defense actually playing
    that bad?
    
    Roy L. 
35.308CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatMon Oct 21 1991 22:2325
    FWIW, O'Donnell was 14 of 22 for 184 yards, with one TDand 1 int.
    not too bad for the way the rest of the team played.
    
    Noll was quoted,"We just did not function.  We made mistake after
    mistake after mistake.  Offensively, we killed ourselves,  Defensively,
    we killed ourselves."
    
    Added Gene Collier, columnist for the Pittsburgh Press:
    
    "Uh-huh.  The rare double suicide, with an inquest continuing on
    special teams, a third corpse at the crime scene."
    
    14 penalties, 6 fumbles, 5 missed tackles, minimum, 4 scks, 3 dropped
    passes, one interception, one blocked punt.  One conversion on nine
    third or fourth down situations.  More indiscretions than Jimmy
    Swaggart, more blunders bloopers and boners than "America's Funniest
    Home Videos!!!
    
    The Steelers sipped, no make that SUCKED yesterday.  If they don't get
    their a$$es in gear, they may be lucky to win 2 or 3 more games the
    rest of the year.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.309Hire Ron Meyer...COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Oct 22 1991 20:154
      Where is Childs?   HE talks crap about other teams when they lose, 
    but is silent here?
    
    	Tim
35.310CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentTue Oct 22 1991 23:2249
    STEELERS .vs. SeaPidgeons
    
    Scoring Summary
    			1	2	3	4		T
    SeaPidgeons		3	14	3	7		27
    STEELERS		0	0	7	0		7
    
    Sea--FG Kasay 36 yd
    Sea--Williams 1 yd run(Kasay PAT)
    Sea--Chadwick 14 yd pass from Krieg(Kasay PAT)
    STEELERS--Stone 57 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
    Sea--FG Kasay 21 yd
    Sea--Tice 1 yd pass from Krieg(Kasay PAT)
    
    Attendance--54,678
    
    TEAM STATISTICS
    Seattle						STEELERS
    18				First Downs		12
    30-65			Rushes-Yds		15-78
    25-31-0			Compl-Att-Int		14-22-1
    3-7				Sacked-Yds lost		4-22
    6-46			Punts			7-33
    0-0				Fumbles-lost		6-2
    6-48			Penalties-Yds		14-90
    39:55			Time of Possession	20:05
    
    Individual Stats:
    RUSHING
    Seattle: J.L.Williams 17-43, Warren 11-13, Krieg 2-9
    STEELERS:  Foster 7-36, Hoge 6-22, Thompson 1-14, O'Donnell 1-6
    
    PASSING
    Seattle: Krieg 25-31-0-266 yds
    STEELERS: O'Donnell 14-22-1-184 yds
    
    RECEIVING
    Seattle: J.L.Williams 7-50, Kane 6-102, Chadwick 5-76, Blades 3-29,
    	Tice 2-7, Clark 1-5, Warren 1-(-3)
    STEELERS: Calloway 3-32, Lipps 3-28, Stone 2-67, Hoge 2-18, Thompson
    	2-8, Green 1-18, Foster 1-13.
    
    FUMBLES
    STEELERS:  Foster 2, O'Donnell 2, Lloyd 1, Hoge 1.
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
35.311CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 23 1991 00:20109
    It's not quite midseason for the STEELERS yet, BUT, if they keep
    playing like they did Sunday against the SeaPidgeons, the second half
    of this season is going to seem like an eternity.  The Steelers were
    supposed to have an improved defense over lasted year, which would have
    made them about the best in the NFL, but so far, the defense has been
    offensive.  More like a strainer trying to hold water.
    
    Now the offense.  This is the 2nd(and hopefully last) year of the "Joe
    Booger Walton" offense in Pittsburgh.  Lasted year, it took 4 games
    before the Steeler offense scored a TD.  This year, although the
    Steeler offense has scored some TD's, they are a 3 down and out
    offense, suffering from penalties, penalties, penalties.   It seems
    that every time the STEELERS get the freakin' ball, somebody jumps
    before the snap, or somebody is guilty of holding, or some other STUPID
    penalty pops up and the Steelers are faced with starting in a deep
    hole.  So far, the Steelers are averaging 8 penalties for 58
    yards/game.
    
              What doesn't help, they are suffering from horrendous play
    calling on third down, by, you guessed it, Joe "Booger" himself.  The
    offense is truly offensive, too!!!  Poor execution, putrid offensive
    line, receivers dropping an average of 4 passes per game, fumbles,
    fumbles fumbles...Although Barry Foster leads the Steelers in rushing
    yardage, he has fumbled 5 times in 84 carries, an average of once every
    16+ times he gets the ball.
    
    	The STEELERS have not beaten a team with a winning record yet. 
    Their 3 victories came against teams whose aggregate mark is 4-19,
    while their 4 losses came against teams who are a combined 18-12.
    
    
    The Steelers have been thru the easy part of their schedule now and
    tougher roads lie ahead.  At this point, judging by the teams they've
    played, the STeelers should be 5-2 or even 6-1, but the team just never
    seems to be prepared properly, and takes 2 or more quarters to get the
    ball moving, and by then it's too late and they're normally facing a
    comeback instead of holding a lead.
    
    The Steelers remaining schedual, and my predictions for these games are
    as follows
    
    	Oct 27, at Clevescum
    Clevescum is fielding a much improved team over lasted year.  Bernice
    is getting more time to throw and has played well so far this year. 
    The defense is much improved also.  If the STEELERS "SHOW UP" for this
    game, it should be a close one, but judging by the way they've played
    so far, I see it as Clevescum 24-10.
    
    	Nov. 3  at Denver
    Don't know much about the Donks this year, but their 5-2 and leading
    the AFC West, and seem to be playing much better ball than they did
    lasted year, also.  The Steelers and Donks have put on some good, close
    football games in the past at Pile-It-High, bgut the STEELERS will
    succumb to thin air, and thin brain tissue on part of Joe "Booger"
    and fall again, 31-13.
    
    	Nov 10, at Cincinnati
    Sam Wyche, getting crazier by the week, will don a clown outfit and
    show his true colors.  By halftime, he will have been taken off of the
    field by 3 large men in white suits, never to be seen again outside of
    the asylum.  Ickey Woods gets named interim coach and spends the second
    half getting flagged for doing stupid dances on the sidelines everytime
    it looks like the Bungholes will gain a yard.  Still, the STEELERS trip
    over their own feet, but nudge out a close one, 21-20.
    
    	NOV 17  Washington
    STEELERS get scalped, 42-3.
    
    	Nov. 24  Houscum
    Warmand Mooned and the Oilslicks invade Three Rivers and slip thru the
    declining secondary, building a 24 point first half lead, but slip in
    the second half but still manage to hold on, 35-24.
    
    	Nov 28	at Dallass
    Troy Aikman and Mr PerfectHair's Cryboys have a tough day in Tex-Ass
    stadium, but Steeler penalties again come back to haunt them on
    Thanksgiving day as the Steelers get caught with turkey on their face,
    24-23.
    
    	DEC 8, at Houscum
    The Oilslicks, with their pansy blue, in the house of the brain dead,
    look past the STEELERS, and fall flat on their faces, losing to the
    Black and Gold, 24-10.
    
    	Dec 15, Cincinnati
    The Bungholes come into Three Rivers with their newest gimmick, the
    hurry up defense.  Boomer tries throwing right handed, and the
    Bungholes lose their 15th of the year, 27-6.
    
    	Dec 22  Clevescum
    The Brown(spot)s(tm) and the STEELERS both enter this game with 6-9
    records.  Bernice will be out for this game, after spraining an ankle
    when the heel of his favorite pumps breaks off unexpectedly.  his
    replacement will do his Bubby Brister imitation, while Brister does his
    Bubby Brister imitation, and the teams finish out the '91 season
    playing to a 3-3 tie that sees league records in both penalties in one
    game, and in penalty yardage in one game.  3-3
    
    The Steelers would have to consider this season a success if they
    finish at .500.  The continued ineptitude on either side of the ball
    should be cause for a house cleaning of all assistatn coaches, and
    possibly of the entire coaching staff, Noll himself included.
    
    These are only my predictions as of right now, they are subject to
    revision at any time, and are in no way factual.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.312CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 23 1991 01:096
    BTW, the Steelers were 1-8  on third down conversions Sunday, bringing
    their season total to 18 of 70 on 3rd down(a whopping 25.7%).
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.313STEELER FANS: Required reading!!!!CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 23 1991 01:10100
Reprinted from The Pittsburgh Press, without permission, from Monday, Oct 21,
1991

by 

Gene Collier

	Neil O'Donnell, making his first professional start at QB, completed 14
of 22 passes for 184 yards, including a 57 yard TD strike to Dwight Stone
yesterday as almost all of the other Steelers stunk like you wouldn't believe
and got ripped by the Seattle Seahawks, 27-7, in a game Seattle should have
been ashamed not to win by 50 points.
	Hmph. It wasn't that hard at all.
	I'm supposed to be writing about O'Donnell, but I couldn't figure out
how to work him in.
	He was merely the mechanic on duty yesterday, bent over the blown
engine that is the 1991 Steelers.  He just happened to be standing around when
the brilliant sunshine backlit this team for what it really is, a noxious
backfire of ignorance and apathy with the collective attention span of cheese.
	"We didn't have a good week(of practice)," Chuck Noll said, "We have to
have better preparation if we have to stay out all day and all night to get
that attention."
	"We just did not function.  We made mistake after mistake after
mistake.  Offensively, we killed ourselves.  Defensively, we killed ourselves."
	Uh-huh.  The rare double suicide, with an inquest continuing on special
teams, a third corpse at the crime scene.  
	How it'll wash out is hard to tell, but the easiest conviction should
be fraud.  Charging people cash to see THIS under the label of professional
football should get somebody three to five.
	But back to O'Donnell.  Although Neil did his very best, it's not fair
to imply that the young man was the only Steeler who was mistake-free.  In
truth, he was once charged with delay of game; his problem was that he couldn't
delay it enough.
	His teammates helped put together a memorable opening series for him. 
It included three penalties, a fumble, a sack, and they wrapped it up with a
blocked punt.   THE TOTAL PACKAGE!!
	Then, things got ugly!!!
	O'Donnell searched his memory to find out why he wanted this job.  The
Steelers did this for him, fumbled six times, committed 14 penalties, dropped
three passes, blew about a dozen assignments and nearly got him killed.
	The offense, had seven false starts, more than NASA.  Tom Ricketts got
the hat trick, although not a natural one as the Steelers tucked six other
penalties between his second and third false starts.
	"I just told everyone to keep working hard," O'Donnell said of his
comportment in the huddle.  "I told them to just relax, that mistakes were
going to happen.  I just never thought that this many could happen."
	Even in his own naivete, O'Donnell had a right to expect better for
himself than this, but expecting anything at all from this team is only a
gaurantee of disappointment.
	In the third wuarter, with a sullen crowd growing hostile, punter Dan
Stryzinski's baby picture was flashed on the scoreboard as part of a quiz, a
multiple choice name-that-baby bit.  Better to take all of these guys baby
pictures and put them in the game program each week.
	Poise??Demeanor??Concentration?? Yes, of babies, and the baby lobby
probably won't be too happy with that.
	Rod "No Comment" Woodson drew consecutive unsportsmanlike conduct
penalties,  Donald Evans was ejected for hitting somebody(finally) and Greg
Lloyd threw in an incredible daily double--the offside penalty on third and 5
and the drive sustaining cheap-shot roughing the passer penalty.
	These guys are critical parts of the defense that turned generic
Seattle QB Dave Krieg into Otto Graham.  
	Krieg, in his first game after seven weeks of inactivity, went 25 for
31(including 19 for his first 22) in leading a pedestrian team to a 17-0 lead
and on to an easy victory, it's fourth in eight games.
	On O'Donnell's side of the ball, things are much worse, so much so that
Neil might be losing touch.
	"I don't think anybody on this team is going to give up," he said.
	Too late on that one.
	"There's a lot of talent out there."
	Too early on that one.
	Offensively, figuring the Steelers is like reading some absurd, poorly
crafted mystery.  Under the old Chuck Noll/Tom Moore offense, you always knew
what was wrong when it was; the fellows weren't executing.  Under the new Chuck
Noll/Joe Walton offense, all anybody including the offense knows is that it
just doesn't work.
	Yesterday's time of pessession was 20:05, the sixth consecutive game in
which the Steelers failed to get half the possession time, the sixth in which
they failed to get even 27 minutes.  Even if you're scoring in those precious
minutes, you're putting too much pressure on the defense, not that the Steelers
are scoring, and not that the defense doesn't collapse under minimal pressure,
anyway.
	The Steelers have scored one ruching TD in the past five games, and
when Dwight Stone scored his second TD of the year yesterday, he moved ahead of
Louis Lipps, the other starting wideout, who remains tied with linebacker Bryan
Hinkle with one.  Oh, I forgot, the passing game is tight-end oriented.  Is
that why the supposed best tight end around got the ball thrown to him once
yesterday???
	Somebody get a clue with this team.
	Noll was clear with his distaste for yesterday's performance, and
suitably threatening in his proposed solutions, but when someone asked him what
causes a team to be so ragged, so undisciplinied, he said:

	"Your guess is as good as mine."

If that is true, what's he doing there?????



JaKe

35.314At least we and the Pittsburgh press are objective...SHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsWed Oct 23 1991 12:1111
    JaKe, thanks for printing .313.  Truly sums things up.  I especially
    loved:
    
>	The Steelers have scored one ruching TD in the past five games, and
>when Dwight Stone scored his second TD of the year yesterday, he moved ahead of
>Louis Lipps, the other starting wideout, who remains tied with linebacker Bryan
>Hinkle with one.  Oh, I forgot, the passing game is tight-end oriented.  Is
>that why the supposed best tight end around got the ball thrown to him once
>yesterday???
    
    	--dan'l
35.315CNTROL::CHILDSEver meet a weak Ape?Wed Oct 23 1991 12:556
 Hi Tim, I'm here what would you like me to say? So the Steelers
 stunk sunday woopie. If I was you I wouldn't throw stones when
 my team finished in lasted placed lasted yeared..

 ;^)
35.316Bring back the trap playsPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonWed Oct 23 1991 13:137
  Jake, .311 is a great note. I laughed after every line. Maybe
  you should send it into Steeler's Digest. The only sad thing is that
  it looks like all of your predictions will come true.

  J_e (where's the o) has to go. 

	Keith
35.317CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 23 1991 17:4713
    Barry Foster's sprained ankle most likely will keep him out of Sunday's
    game in the sludge pit.
    
    Noll said that since Worley is not ready physically(probably mentally
    too) to return, the Steelers may go to the "Mistake by the Lake" with
    only 3 running backs.
    
    Noll also said that Neil o'Donnell will get at least one, maybe more,
    starts whilst Brister nurses his boo-boo on his knee.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.318Donks Lasted(tm) place finish better than the SqueelersQUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeWed Oct 23 1991 18:407
    Now Now Mikey....  don't get too cranky with Tim.....  You know
    we all hate to see you beloved Squeelers fall victim to the sea
    chickens.  Listen Mikey.....  I'd be willing to bet the Squeelers
    don't win another game this year and finish with a much worse 
    record than the donks did lasted(tm) year.
    
    Big Game
35.319Worley searching for the answer to his problemsCELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 23 1991 22:426
    Steeler Running back Tim Worley checked into an Alcohol Rehab center
    today.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.320ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Oct 24 1991 12:333
    
    What a waste of talent.  I thought Worley would be a dominant force
    in the NFL for years.  
35.321CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentThu Oct 24 1991 18:018
    Graoner,
    
    Looks more like a waste of a #1 draft pick to me!!!!
    But the Steelers are used to wasting those.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.322Numbers, Numbers, and more NumbersCELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentFri Oct 25 1991 21:00164
STEELER STATS thru 7 games

Results and Attendance:
STEELERS  	26		San Diego	20	55,848
STEELERS	34		Buffalo		52	79,545
STEELERS	20		New England	 6	53,703
STEELERS	14		Philadelphia	23	65,511
STEELERS	21		Indianapolis	 3	55,383
STEELERS	20		NY Giants	23	57,608
STEELERS	 7		Seattle		27	54,678

Record 3-4

TEAM STATISTICS:
				STEELERS	Opponents

Total First Downs		103		133
  Rushing			 37		 42
  Passing			 64		 80
  Penalty			  5		 11

  Third-down:
    made/att			18/70		47/105
    3rd down percentage		25.7		44.8
    4th Down Percentage		 0.0		100

Total Net Yards			2080		2190
	Avg. per game		 297.1		 312.9
	total plays		 353		 464
	Avg. per play		   5.9		   4.7

Net Yards Rushing		731		770
	per game		104.4		100
	total rushes		153		220

Net Yards Passing		1349		1420
	per game		 192.7		 202.9
	Sacked/yds lost		16/134		19/119
	Gross yards		1483		1539
	Att/Comp		184/108		225/145
	Completion %		58.7		64.4
	Had intercepted		8		6

Punts/Average			36/38.9		35/41.0

Net Punting Avg.		35.6		33.9

Penalties/yards			58/412		36/266

Fumbles/lost			19/5		5/4

Touchdowns			16		16
  Rushing			 4		 4
  Passing			10		11
  Returns			 2		 1

Score by periods:
			1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS		20	20	20	62		142
Opponents		27	52	24	51		154

INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS

SCORING
			TD
		Rush	pass	ret	PAT	FG	S	total pts
Anderson	0	0	0	16/16	10/11	0	46
EricGreen	0	4	0	0	0	0	24
Hoge		2	1	0	0	0	0	18
Foster		1	1	0	0	0	0	12
Stone		0	2	0	0	0	0	12
Calloway	0	1	0	0	0	0	 6
Hinkle		0	0	1	0	0	0	 6
Lipps		0	1	0	0	0	0	 6
Mills		0	0	1	0	0	0	 6
W.Williams	1	0	0	0	0	0	 6
STEELERS	4	10	2	16/16	10/11	0	142
Opponents	4	11	1	16/14	14/18	0	154

RUSHING:
		#	Yds	Avg	Long	TD
Foster		75	428	5.7	56	1
Hoge		59	328	4.0	15	2
Thompson	3	26	8.1	14	0
O'Donnell	4	24	6.0	11	0
W.Williams	9	16	1.8	9	1
Brister		3	-3     -1.0	2	0
STEELERS	153	731	4.8	56	4

RECEIVING:
		#	yds	avg	long	TD
EricGreen	25	400	16.0	49	4
Hoge		20	146	 7.3	16	1
Lipps		19	221	11.6	24	1
Stone		13	316	24.3	89	2
Foster		 9	117	13.0	31	0
Calloway	 8	150	18.8	33	1
Mularkey	 5	55	11.0	21	9
W.Williams	 4	40	10.0	29	0
Thompson	 4	23	 5.9	 9	0
Graham		 1	15	15.0	15	0
STEELERS	108	1483	13.7	89	10
Opponents	125	1539	10.6	53	11

INTERCEPTIONS:
		#	Yds	TD
Hinkle		1	57	1
Everett		1	27	0
Griffin		1	22	0
Woodson		1	20	0
Johnson		1	 0	0
Lloyd		1	 0	0
STEELERS	6	126	1
Opponents	8	83	1

PUNTING:
         	#	Yds	Avg	Blk

Stryzinski	35	1402	40.1	1
STEELERS	35	1402	40.1	1
Opponents	35	1435	41.0	0

PUNT RETURNS:
		#	FC	Yds	Avg	Long	TD
Woodson		17	9	214	12.6	40	0
Graham		2	1	 13	 6.5	13	0
Mills		1	0	  0	 0.0	0	1
Vincent		1	0	  1	 1.0	1	0
STEELERS	21	10	228	10.9	40	1
Opponents	9	17	 62	 6.9	16	0

KICKOFF RETURNS
		#	Yds	Avg	Long	TD
Woodson		23	467	20.3	42	0
Mills		 4	129	32.3	54	0
Stone		 2	 29	14.5	25	0
Thompson	 1	  8	 8.0	 8	0
STEELERS	30	633	21.1	54	0
Opponents	19	343	18.1	33	0

PASSING:
		Att	Compl	Yds	Pct	TD	Int
Brister		136	81	1053	59.6	6	7
O'Donnell	48	27	 430	56.3	5	1
STEELERS	184	108	1483	58.7	11	8
Opponents	225	145	1539	64.4	11	6

QB SACKS
Lloyd		4
J.Williams	4
Willis		4
Evans		2
Hinkle		2
Jones		2
Veasey		1
G.Williams	1


JaKe



		

35.323GRRRRRRR!UFHIS::MENGLISHMon Oct 28 1991 11:0313
   xxxxxxxxxx                                       xxxxxxxxxx
  x          x                                     x          x
 x            x                                   x            x
x              xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              x
x                                                               x
 x                                                             x
  x            WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!WOOF!            x
 x                                                             x
x                                                               x
x              xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              x
 x            x                                   x            x
  x          x                                     x          x
   xxxxxxxxxx                                       xxxxxxxxxx
35.324re-.1 edited for realismCELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentMon Oct 28 1991 19:0317
                                       xxxxxxxxxx
                                      x          x
                                     x            x
  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              x
                                                   x
                                                  x
    BERNICE'S "DAWG" BONE                        x
                                                  x
                                                   x
  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              x
                                     x            x
                                      x          x
                                       xxxxxxxxxx




35.325Steelers now 3-5CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentMon Oct 28 1991 23:0451
SCORING SUMMARY:
			1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS		0	7	0	7		14
Brown(spot)s(tm)	3	7	7	0		17

'Spots--	FG Stover, 34 yds
'Spots--	Hoard 2 yd lookiewhatIfound, er, I mean pass from Bernice,
		Stover PAT
STEELERS--	O'Donnell 1 yd run, Anderson PAT
'Spots--	MacK 1 yd run, Stover PAT
STEELERS--	Willians 1 yd run, Anderson PAT
A--78285

TEAM STATISTICS:

STEELERS					Brown(spot)s(tm)
18			1st Downs		19
23-75			Rushes-Yards		27-83
207			Passing Yds		179
19-35-2			Compl-Att-Int		21-29-0
2-14			Sacked-Yds Lost		0-0
1-37			Punts			3-41
1-0			Fumbles-Lost		1-0
5-35			Penalties-Yds		6-40
26:41			Time of Possession	33:19

INDIVIDUAL STATS:

RUSHING:
STEELERS:  Hoge 12-48, Williams 9-26, O'Donnell 2-1.
'Spots:	Mack 19-54, Metcalf 1-12, Moris 2-9, Bernice 4-6, Hoard 1-2

PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 19-35-2int, 221 yds
'Spots: Bernice 21-29-0int 179 yds

RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Hoge 6-56, Lipps 5-69, Stone 3-53, Green 3-25, Calloway 1-17, Cooper
	  1-1
'Spots:  Brennan 5-52, Slaughter 4-38, Mack 4-21, Metcalf 3-23, Langhorne 2-13,
	 Jackson 1-26, Galbraith 1-4, Hoard 1-2.

PUNTING:
STEELERS:  Stryzinski 1-37 yds
'Spots:  Hansen 3-124


JaKe



35.326Today's Gene CollierCELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentMon Oct 28 1991 23:5890
STEELERS CREATING AN ILLUSION OF MEDIOCRITY; TRUTH IS, THEY AREN'T THAT GOOD!

reprinted from The Pittsburgh Press, Monday 10-28-1991
without permission

BY

Gene Collier

CLEVELAND--The Steelers worked 60 hard minutes on an illusion here yesterday
and very nearly sold it to the Cleveland Browns and some 78,000 of their
admirers.
	The ruse was that Chuck Noll's team was of standard blood and guts
posture and temperament, eminently worthy of this storied rivalry, and
certainly a physical match for anybody on Any Given Sunday, especially a team
with a record no better than it's own 3-4.
	Right, and Sophie Masloff is an operatic Tenor.
	The gap between how ostensibly mediocre the Steelers are and how bad
they really are is sometimes so vast that people get lost in it.  They
hallucinate.
	Look at Bernie Kosar, Browns QB, who yesterday threw an unusual 2-yard
TD pass that clanked off a defender and fell into the hands of Leroy Hoard, who
was flat on his back in the end zone.
	"I really don't know what happened," Kosar said, "I know the ball was
tipped; I think by them.  I saw it tipped and I saw a black jersey."
	Well, Bernie, there were no black jerseys out there yesterday.  The
Steelers wore white and the Browns wore brown.  See?  These Steelers just
aren't what they appear.
	Had Noll's team somehow pulled this off, perhaps had Gary Anderson's
52-yarder avoided the upright to the good side and perhaps had he banged home
another in overtime, noll's team would be 4-4 and someone would be trying to
figure a route to a wild-card game.
	Fortunately, there was a man out there in the grass playing his 25th
Steelers-Browns game, and he made two monstrous plays in the final minutes to
put just the right spin on things.
	Clay Matthews, the 35-year old linebacker who first met the Steelers in
1978, ran down Neil O'Donnell on a blitz for a 9-yard loss with 1:33 to play,
shoving the Steelers into a third and 19 situation from which they would not
emerge.
	"We'd called for that blitz once before, but they'd jumped offsides on
the play," Matthews said, "I didn't really do anything on it; they just didn't
block me."
	Oh, Matthews has made maybe 200 tackles in this series.  They jsut
didn't block him on that play.
	Two plays later, O'Donnell was looking for Eric Green down the middle
for a fourth and 14 desperation fastball.  Matthews intercepted and ran 35
yards toward the lake, ending this episode with Cleveland ahead 17-14.
	"It's always gratifying to beat the Steelers," Matthews said, "The
interesting thing was that before the game we went out there and the rain was
coming down and for some reason, my first five years here, when the Steelers
were really good, every time we played them it was like that.  It was just like
we turned the clock back 10 to 14 years."
	That, of course, is strictly a weather related deja vu.
	Had this been 14 years ago, the Steelers would have crushed this Browns
team like a roach.  Cleveland went into its eighth game claiming only victories
against Steelers patsies New England and San Diego and a one-point victory
against still winless Cincinnati.  Opponents were converting nearly half of
their third downs against the Cleveland defense, and the Steelers used that
weakness to improve their horrible conversion rate toward actual
respectability.
	And yet at a station many would characterize as not very good at all,
the Browns were clearly superior to Noll's team, especially in the aspect of
ball control.
	Cleveland ate two-thirds of the first quarter on the game's opening
possession with a 15-play drive, its longest of the season.  A subsequent
15-play drive swallowed 7 1/2 minutes.
	"Seven and eight minute drives kill you," Noll said after his club's
third consecutive loss, and fourth in its past five games.  "It doesn't leave
enough time for the offense."
	Right, especially this offense, which continues to "develop" at about
the rate of a third world country.  Only two of their eight opponents have
figured out a way to allow three Steelers touchdowns on the same day, and one
of those was Indianapolis.
	What a team like the houston Oilers is going to do to the Steelers
isn't entirely clear, but I'll bet it's something like what the Denver Broncos
and Washington Redskins are going to do with them as well, and it won't be
flattering.
	If they're fortunate, the Steelers will finish without another victorym
or with one at the most, and that will clarify the situation.  This is not a
team or a franchise that needs tinkering or patience.  It needs a wrecking ball
and then an architect.
	You should really hope it doesn't rally to 8-8 and send the wrong
signal.  Any run toward a wild card would ensure another decade of hopeful
non-achievment.



JaKe


35.327CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentTue Oct 29 1991 00:019
    In yesterday's(Sunday's) "Press", Gene Collier compared Noll's record
    over the lasted few years with other "former" coaches records over the
    same time span.  To say Noll's Steeler teams have been mediocre over
    that timespan is an understatement.  If'n the Mrs. didn't pitch it,
    I'll bring it in tomorrow and enter it into here if I gets the chance.
    Good article.
    
    JaKe
    
35.328Here's the article I promised in -.1CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 30 1991 01:0099
STEELERS JOB MAY NOT BE NOLL'S LIFE'S WORK

Reprinted without permission from The Pittsburgh Press
10-27-1991

By

Gene Collier

	Remember Al Saunders????
	No, not the guy on ESPN, that's John Saunders.
	Nope, not the former Pirates announcer, that's John Sanders.
	No, not the minor league maven in "Bull Durham", that's Susan Sarandon;
now you're getting ridiculous.
	Al Saunders, c'mon.  One-time head coach of a National Football League
team, sort of.  I mean pretty recently.
	All right, don't sweat it.  Just about nobody remembers the Al Saunders
era, mostly because he took over for Don Coryell halfway through the 1986
season and hung around the San Diego Chargers until the end of 1988, then he
wasn't there anymore.  No big thing; he just didn't so enough to keep his job
by contemporary standards.  He went 17-22 and that wasn't what his employers
had in mind.
	At exactly the same time, that's mid '86 until the end of 1988, Chuck
Noll's record with the Steelers was exactly the same, 17-22.  Even head to
head, Noll and Saunders met twice and split.
	But Saunders is long gone and all but forgotten while Noll remains
unforgettable.  What was unacceptable in San Diego was acceptable in
Pittsburgh, and remains so.
	At the end of the 1989 season, Jerry Glanville had overstayed his
welcome in Houston.  He landed a job with the Atlanta Falcons right about the
time he was going to land among the nation's unemployed.  His record at
Houston, in five seasons, was 38-41 and the Oilers reached the playoffs three
times.
	In that same period, Noll went 35-44 and the Steelers made the playoffs
once.  Less than what was unacceptable in Houston was acceptable in Pittsburgh,
and remains so.
	On Oct 1, coach Ron Meyer was fired by the Indianapolis Colts.  The
Colts were 0-5, but Meyer's record, beginning with the 14th game of the 1986
season, was 36-35, and the Colts reached the playoffs once.  
	In that same period, Noll was 35-35, and the Steelers made the playoffs
once.  Less than what was unacceptable in Indianapolis was acceptable in
Pittsburgh, and remains so.
	For Meyer, it was his second firing.  He was dismissed by the New
England Patriots in 1984 after having won 18 and lost 14 in a period in which
Noll went 20-13.  So essentially, Meyer was fired in two different places for
going 54-51 while Noll was a vastly superior 55-48.  Hey, Pittsburgh has its
standards.
	At the end of the 1989 season, Ray Berry was no longer welcome at New
England.  His teams had made the playoffs twice and one was the only New
England team ever to reach the Super Bowl.  Berry's record was 48-39 when his
days as a head coach ended.
	In that same period, Noll went 40-47.  Less than what was unacceptable
in New England was acceptable in Pittsburgh, and remains so.
	As Berry's career as a head coach was ending, so was Joe Walton's with
the Jets.  Walton had coached seven seasons and his teams had made the playoffs
twice.  His record was 54-59-1.  In those seven years, he had won exactly as
many games as Noll.
	What was unacceptable in New York was acceptable in Pittsburgh, and
remains so much so that Walton now runs the Steelers' offense, such as it is.
	Obviously, Noll does not have to conform to contemporary standards.  It
is enough that he "might".  The team he runs out there today against the
Cleveland Browns "might" go 3-13; that's how bad it is.
	When last seen, Noll's 23rd team was playing a game we've all seen
before, playing out a classic script.  It was the typical
"game-before-the-coach-is-fired" performance.  Fourteen penalties, seven for
false starts(the trademark of an undisciplined, poorly coached team), six
fumbles, pathetic offense, its emotional wiring smoking and cracking on defense
with unsportsmanlike conduct, unnecessary roughness, and other violations, one
of which drew an ejection.  The basic, total disgrace.
	"I'm not going to say too much at this time; there's not much to be
said about that game," Steelers president Dan Rooney said in his office the
other day.  And he didn't.  As to the matter of the head coaches
accountability, either for his team, this season, or this past decade, Rooney
said only, "Everybody has accountability in this organization."
	Perhaps so, but the accountability, if the head coaches situation is
any indicator, is to a low standard.
	One hundred and fifty people have been hired as head coaches in the NFL
since Rooney hired Noll in 1969.  Buffalo has hired 11, Indianapolis 11, New
England 10, Houston 9 and New Orleans 9.  Those are the examples of
instability, certainly, but they are also examples of pulse.  Even franchises
of relative stability-Denver, the Raiders, the Rams, and Cincinnati; four that
have produced 6 Super Bowl teams since Pittsburgh last did--have hired 16 head
coaches since Rooney hired Noll.
	Rooney no doubt envisions a day when he will tell Chuck it's over, but
i think when he does, he also hears the voice of John Facenda, intoning all the
glories of the '70s in that Hall of Fame soundtrack, and it makes it very hard.
	Noll's a legend and a hall of famer, so one last comparison.
	At the end of the 1988 season, Tom Landry had soached his last game for
the Dallas Cowboys.  He was the only head coach in their history.  He'd won
more games(270) and been to more Super Bowls(5) than even Chuck Noll.  But in
his final four seasons, the Cowboys went 27-36.  Over that same period, Noll
went 26-37.  What was no longer acceptable in Dallas, even by a legend and a
hall of famer, was acceptable in Pittsburgh, and remains so.
	The Cowboys are 5-2 and making progress.  The Steelers are only making
mistakes.


JaKe

35.329Not to be taken for grantedUFHIS::MENGLISHWed Oct 30 1991 04:372
    Great article! The more I read from this guy here, the more I miss the
    wonderful sports writers in the states.
35.330CAM::WAYMUNG, the #1 WORST TreatWed Oct 30 1991 09:473
That guy is good.

He's even approaching Dave Barry status, although with a sports bent....
35.331CELTIK::JACOBSnorkeller extraordinaireWed Oct 30 1991 18:2712
    
    Noll said yesterday that, for all intents and purposes, the position of
    starting QB is O'Donnell's to lose.  He said that although O'donnell
    has made some mistakes, ie interceptions and formation problems, he
    remains impressed with the second year QB.
    
    Huey Richardson, who had the "scope" stuck in his knee in Sept, started
    practicing Oct 18, and now has a severely inflammed knee.  The Steelers
    luck with first rounders sips big-time.
    
    JaKe
    
35.332CELTIK::JACOBFri Nov 01 1991 18:0021
    Tim Worley is at it again, this guy seems to be trying to get himself
    kicked off of the Steelers for good.
    
    Word has it that he has been suspended for 6 games, (until Dec 9th) for
    failing drug tests.  Seems they found traces of nose candy in his
    leakage.
    
    He had tested positive for cocaine during the summer but the NFL
    doesn't release first time offenders names.
    
    Worley is currently receiving rahabilitative services for Alcohol
    abuse.
    
    He better get his head on straight or his NFL career will have been
    VERY VERY short.
    
    Sheez, the guy had the world by the balls and is trying to throw it
    away.
    
    JaKe
    
35.333Steelers now 3-6, have lost 4 in a rowCELTIK::JACOBMon Nov 04 1991 22:2738
SCORING SUMMARY:
		1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS	3	7	0	3		13
Broncos		0	17	3	0		20

TEAM STATS:
STEELERS				BRONCOS
19		first downs		17
31-146		rushes-yards		31-144
163		passing yards		130
18-33-1		compl-att-int		10-23-1
6-41		sacked-yards lost	1-10
6-42		punts			4-47
2-0		funbles-lost		3-1
6-91		penalties-yards		4-27
33:13		time of possession	26:47

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS:  Williams 11-63, Hoge 13-43, O'Donnell 4-37, Thompson 3-3.
Denver:	   Lewis 19-111, Elway 5-17, Humphrey 5-15, Sewell 2-1

PASSING:
STEELERS:  O'Donnell 18-33-1int 1TD 204 yds
Denver:	   Elway 10-23-1int 1TD 140 yds

RECEIVING:
STEELERS:  Lipps 5-81, Hoge 5-32, Green 3-34, Williams 2-20, Calloway 1-14,
	   Mularkey 1-12, Stone 1-11.
Denver:	   Jackson 3-54, Young 2-32, Kay 1-32, Russell 1-11, Sewell 1-6,
	   R.Johnson 1-4, Sharpe 1-1.


JaKe




35.334Neil will displace Brister from here to eternityCELTIK::JACOBMon Nov 04 1991 22:3525
    Bright spots out of lasted nights game:
    Neil O'Donnell looks destined to make Bubby Brister a second string QB,
    which is where he(Brister) belongs.
    
    Dark Spots:
    Greg Lloyd gets involved in an altercation with Broncos tackle Ken
    Lanier and gets flagged for 15 yards, Jerrol Williams gets flagged for
    5 yards for delaying the game by moving the ball, Aaron Jones hits Mr.
    Ed 6 feet out of bounds, when horse face was already on the ground, and
    gets nailed for 15 yards.  STUPID PENALTIES which cost the Steelers the
    game.  
    
    The play calling on the final drive, once the Steelers got to the Conks
    9 and had the ball 2nd and 1 to go, STUNK.  3 passes into the end zone,
    when another yard further, and the Steelers would have had a first down
    and had 4 tries to get it into the end zone. Dumb, just plain Dumb.
    
    Greg Lloyd is quickly becoming a liability, instead of an asset.  For
    every sack he gets, he seems to give up more yardage in penalties for
    late hits, or fighting, and it has hurt the Steelers.
    
    Lasted night, dumb Steeler penalties cost the Steelers 10 points.
    
    JaKe
    
35.335CELTIK::JACOBMon Nov 04 1991 22:4010
    One footnote to be added to .334
    
    Neil O'Donnel's stats so far are as follows:
    	Compl	Att	Yds	Int	TD	Compl %		Long Compl
    	64	116	855	4	5	55.2		89
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.336Can't wait to see ya grovel !!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 05 1991 13:118
     Hey JaKe.....  Only Seven more games to pull out a win !!
    Do the Squeelers play the Dolts ???   Could be their only 
    prayer....
    
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game
35.337FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Nov 05 1991 14:053
    Pittsburgh has already beaten Indianapolis.
    
    John
35.338ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Nov 05 1991 15:519
    
    Jake,
    
    YOU NEVER SENT ME THE DOLLAR you lost to me last year... (I wanted
    to post it next to the Dork Midwife BUCK I've got hanging in my
    office)... anyways... want to make a friendly bet on who will 
    have a better record at the end of the season (browns or steelers)?
    
    
35.339QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 05 1991 16:317
    
     Thanks Ninj.....  I guess I can't lose now !!
    
    Big Game
    
    P.s I'll have a question for ya in the QA note soon,  hope you can
    help!
35.340CELTIK::JACOBCity of Chicago says,Vote Early,Vote OftenTue Nov 05 1991 17:539
    Groaner,
    
    As I stated in the mail message I sent you, grasp into the deep
    recesses of your brain(if it's IN today), and remember the CHECK for $5
    that I sent you and you CASHED lasted year after the Steelers failed to
    meet the wagered upon record.
    
    JaKe
    
35.341CELTIK::JACOBChicago says, Vote Early &amp; OftenTue Nov 05 1991 18:2415
    During Chuck Noll's weekly press conference yesterday, he said that ho
    doesn't think that this team is that far away from being a championship
    caliber team.  HAHAHAHAHA.
    He said that they just have to learn to win the close games.  Right,
    now tell me something I don't already know.
    
    Noll also stated, when asked if he'll start playing the rookies to get
    them some game experience, that the team will continue to play it's
    best players and not give up on this season, and they will play to win
    every game, regardless of what their record falls to.  Oh well, guess
    they'll win just enuf to be out of the hunt for a top player in the
    draft nexted year.
    
    JaKe
    
35.342CELTIK::JACOBMon Nov 11 1991 04:3222
    Great comeback by the Steelers yesterday at Riverfront to take the lead
    with less than 2 minutes remaining in regulation time, after trailing
    early, 17-3.  They Take the lead with 1:30 left, 27-24, only to have
    the Bungholes drive into Steeler territory and tie it up with a field
    goal.  In the OT, Greg Lloyd strips Ickey "Dancing Dork" Woods of the
    ball and a couple of plays later, Neil O'Donnell hits a WIDE open Eric
    Green for the game winner.  O'Donnell hit 3 TD's in the game.
    
    Jerroll Williams, LB, returned a Boomer Esiason fumble for a TD for the
    Steelers first TD, then O'Donnell hit rookie wide receiver Ernie Mills
    for a TD, and he also hit Louis Lipps for a score, on a play where
    Lipps put forth a tremendous second effort to get into the end zone.
    
    Ya know, after suffering thru Cliff Stoudt, Mark Malone, and Brister, I
    hate to say this, but O'Donnell, though still making some mistakes due
    to inexperience, looks 300% better than Brister ever has, and shows
    beau coup poise under pressure.
    
    I'll put the game stats in later on this evening, time permitting.
    
    JaKe
    
35.343ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Nov 11 1991 15:012
    
    Have the Steelers beaten the Browns this year?
35.345CELTIK::JACOBGrin &amp; Bear it or Bare It &amp; Grin??Mon Nov 11 1991 17:566
    Kwak:
    
    I concur whole-heartedly!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.346No QB controversy here anymore!!!CELTIK::JACOBGrin &amp; Bear it or Bare It &amp; Grin??Mon Nov 11 1991 18:1412
    FWIW
    
    I don't have my paper in front of me but I think O'Donnell's stats
    yesterday were as follows:
    
    24-39 0 Interceptions, 3TD's, 309 yards.  He threw his first 2 TD's in
    the fourth quarter when he rallyed the Steelers from a 11 point
    deficit, and threw the third in OT to Eric Green who held onto this
    one.
    
    JaKe
    
35.347They finally win one !!PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Nov 11 1991 19:0419
  It's nice to see the Steeler's get over the Cincinnati jinx and finally
  win one in Riverfront stadium. How long has it been since they beat the
  Bengal's ? How long since they won in Riverfront ?

  I remember the last time they played each other. It was basically for the
  Central divison championship and Bubby overthrew at least 2 or 3 wide
  open receivers on critical plays. At that time I gave up on Brister. It's
  good to see O'Donnell playing this well. I hope stays healthy and continues
  to improve. I think he could be one of the better QB's in football. It's also
  good to see one of the rookie receiver's finally get into the game and make 
  a big play(Ernie Mill's TD reception). The TD by Lipps shows why he's one 
  of the best money player's to ever wear a Steeler uniform. He's definately
  in the same class as Swann and Stalworth. It's just too bad, he had QB's
  like Malone and Brister throwing to him for most of his career.

  With all of these good things said, I still don't think the Steeler's are 
  going anywhere until they get a better offensive line. 

				Keith
35.348Steelers !!!!! Best team in football !!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 11 1991 20:4818
    Absolutely incredible......   The Steelers have to be the come 
    back team of the year.  What an incredible Defense !!!  The 
    whole team played to the caliber that I always knew they could. 
    O'donnell is going to be a Hall of Fame QB and Woodson seems to have 
    put his cloudy past behind him and is playing Pro-Bowl football.
    Joe Walton called the best game of his life and is only going to get
    better and better as his tenure with the Steelers continues.  I know
    that the Jets watched this game and are kicking themselve for ever
    letting this offensive genius go. I think that the Steelers are going
    to be the team to beat as we progress through the 1990's.  I can see 
    Chuck knoll putting together dynasty in Pitt that could very well 
    run rough shod over the rest of the NFL for years to come.  I can't
    say enough about how impressed I am with this team.....  They are 
    heads and sholders above the Donks,  no question about it !!
    
    Go Steelers...
    
    Big Game
35.349Steelers now 4-6CELTIK::JACOBGrin &amp; Bear it or Bare It &amp; Grin??Tue Nov 12 1991 00:0869
SCORING SUMMARY

		1	2	3	4	OT		T
STEELERS	0	6	7	14	6		33
Cincy		10	7	0	10	0		27

Cincy--FG Breech 29 yds
Cincy--Woods 4 yd run(Breech PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 44 yd
Cincy--Holman 18 yd pass from Esiason(Breech PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 46 yd
STEELERS-J.Williams 38 yd fumble return
Cincy--Woods 1 yd run(Breech PAT)
STEELERS-Mills 35 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Lipps 12 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Cincy--FG Breech 47 yd
STEELERS-EricGreen 26 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)

TEAM STATISTICS:
STEELERS					Cincy Bungholes
18			1st Downs		25
22-58			Rushes-yds		24-70
294			Passing Yds		336
24-39-0			Compl-Att-Int		32-43-1
2-15			Sacked-Yds Lost		3-25
6-42			Punts			4-43
1-0			Fumbles-Lost		3-2
5-40			Penalties-Yds		8-65
31:00			Time of Possession	35:32
A-55,503

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: Hoge 17-48, W.Williams 4-9, O'Donnell 1-1
Cincy:	  Brooks 15-35, Woods 7-33, H.Green 2-2

PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 24-39-0, 309 yds 3 TD's
Cincy:	  Esiason 32-43-1, 361 yds 1 TD

RECEIVING:
STEELERS: Hoge 5-46, E.Green 4-50, Lipps 4-47, W.Williams 3-44, Stone 3-22,
	  Mills 2-65, Thompson 2-19, Calloway 1-16.
Cincy:	  Brown 10-98, Holman 7-87, Brooks 4-35, Woods 4-11, McGee 3-101,
	  Kattus 3-23, Barber 1-6.

One of the keys to the Steelers being able to come back in this game, IMHO, was
the ability of the defense to keep James Brooks and Ickey Woods from running
for beau coup yards.  Brooks has, historically, been a Steeler killer, and has
had some of his best games .vs. the Steelers.

The Steeler victory was just the Steelers third win in Riverfront Stadium since
1979.

The Steelers QB comparison is as follows:

		Compl	Att	Yds	Compl Pct.	Td	Int
O'Donnell	88	155	1164	56.8		8	4
Brister		81	136	1053	59.6		6	7


WR Ernie Mills, a rookie, had his first career reception in the 3rd quarter, a
35 yd TD pass from O'Donnell.  Mills also had a second reception, good for 30
yards, later in the game and a couple of plays later, Louis Lipps caught a 12
yard pass and with good second effort, got into the end zone for the TD which
temporarily put the Steelers up, 27-24.

JaKe

35.350Or is it just a virus?SHALOT::MEDVIDFrom Lake Geneva...Tue Nov 12 1991 09:5810
    re: .348
    
    Hey, Big Game, can you pass on the code so I can install the software
    behind:
    
    	SET PROCESS/STYLE=HAL_INANE
    
    That was great!
    
    	--dan'l
35.351GENRAL::WADEGimme the beat boysTue Nov 12 1991 12:344
    
    	So, Big Game.  Who'd you lose a bet to?
    
    	Claybroon
35.352Impressive Steelers get DONK Fan K.O.D !!!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 12 1991 12:5213
    
     No one Clay Wad...  I really feel that the Steelers are going to
    be the team to beat in the `90s.....  They have a promising defense,
    a great QB and the Greatest coach to ever coach in the NFL behind
    the almighty Vince of the GB Packers....  Look for the Steelers to 
    win the rest of their games this season and start 10-0 nexted(tm)
    year
    
    
     N O T !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    Big Game
35.353CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILETue Nov 12 1991 13:433
    The Steelers.  One of my all-time favorite teams.
    
    lEe
35.354Check your coffeeCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Tue Nov 12 1991 15:329
      Claybroon asked,  and sooooo will I.  Who did you lose the bet to
    Jack?   Ernie maybe?
    
      You would never say this unless the price was right or you stuck your
    foot in it;^^
    
      Steelers sip and thats that!
    
    	Tim
35.355CELTIK::JACOBGrin &amp; Bear it or Bare It &amp; Grin??Tue Nov 12 1991 18:307
    I personally enjoy seeing Mr Hunter have such confidence in a real
    team!    (8^)*  Tee-Hee, HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa
    
    Good notes, Big Game
    
    JaKe
    
35.356I always payoff..... Even when it hurts !QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerWed Nov 13 1991 11:4212
    Well,
    
     I wasn't going to let the cat outta the bag but since JaKe has all
    but said that I lost a bet to him I guess I can talk now.  The bet
    was that the Squeelers wouldn't win another game after the loss to 
    the Donks.  Obviously the Tigers let me down and allowed an other-
    wise happless bunch of bums sneak out a totaly undeserved win in 
    what could be called the luckiest game ever played.
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game
35.357A down-to-earth kind of guySHALOT::MEDVIDNaze koor fateeriFri Nov 15 1991 11:5254
    A profile of Neal O'Donnell from "Steelers Digest"
    ==================================================
    
    Birthday: July 3, 1966
    
    Height: 6-3  Weight: 225
    
    Position: QB
    
    Born: Morristown, NJ
    
    Current Home: Wexford, PA
    
    Favorite Singer: Bruce Springsteen
    
    Favorite TV Show: Cheers
    
    Favorite Food: Chicken and pasta
    
    Nickname: O'D
    
    Make of Cars: 300ZX, Jimmy 4x4, Ford Explorer
    
    Hobbies: Golf and biking
    
    Favorite Pro Team: New York Knicks, Boston Celtics
    
    Community Activities: Multiple Sclerosis, Make-A-Wish
    
    Pet Peeves: People who chew with their mouth open.
    
    If I Could Change One Thing About Myself: "I would find more time to be
    by myself."
    
    Toughest Thing ABout Being an NFL Player: Getting pumped up each week
    after a tough loss.
    
    What I Like Most About Pittsburgh: The people, the size and cost of
    living in and around the city.
    
    If I could Have Three Wishes: More wins, my golf game could use some
    improvement, and a long, successful career with the Steelers.
    
    People Would Be Surprised to Know That: "I'm the yougest of nine
    children and I had eight different coaches in nine years of football --
    four different in both high school and college."
    
    My Strangest Moment In Football: "Calling my own plays my sophomore
    year in high school.   My coach had a heart attack on the sideline in
    the second quarter.  It was my first high school varsity start and we
    didn't have an offensive coordinator or head coach."
    
    Life After Football: Success and happiness.
    
35.358What brand of undies does he wear?CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Fri Nov 15 1991 12:027
But gee, what's his fave color and what books is he currently reading?
I just gottsta know! 



Steve
35.359CTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSFri Nov 15 1991 12:123
    I would think it'd betough being both a Knick and Celtic fan
    
    
35.360what the status of FosterCELTIK::R_QUINNFri Nov 15 1991 12:1915
    
    Any news on the Barry Foster injury ?  What's his status for Sunday ? 
    You get the feeling that had preseason served it's true purpose, 
    Foster and O'Donnell would have started the season and therefore would
    have long since gotten the bugs out of the O.  Although there is an
    appreciation for high draft picks, I don't think the steelers should
    throw in the towel.  At this point I think the skins are ripe for a
    pickin.  Big blowout over Atlanta, training camp buddies of the
    steelers, and their on the road in what could be a hostile environment. 
    Granted the steelers haven't been playing great but these kinds of
    games help to make seasons when things have been tough.
    
    Roy L.
    
    
35.361ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 15 1991 12:284
    
    I just can't wait until they start showing O'Donnell parents on TV
    during the Steelers games.  That's probably what I miss most about
    that STIFF Brister riding pine.
35.362Answers...SHALOT::MEDVIDNaze koor fateeriFri Nov 15 1991 12:4722
    RE: Foster
    
    Foster practiced the week before the Cinci game and was listed as
    probable.  The week's worth of practice, however, put strain on the
    ankle and he was downgraded to doubtful before the game.  Foster is
    being sent for a second medical opinion.
    
    RE: Washington game
    
    Remember that the Steelers were the only team to beat the 49ers in the
    '84 season just when everyone was thinking they would go 16-0.  Of
    course, that Steelers team went to the AFC Championship game that year.
    
    RE: Gronowski
    
    Stop spewing Cuyahoga Crap.  The networks haven't shown Brister's mom
    in two years.  It's an old joke.  Give it up before you sound even more
    jealous.  And what you'll end up missing the most is not seeing his
    mom, but the fact that with Brister the Steelers were an easy win for
    the Browns.  Now you actually have to face a quality QB.
    
    	--dan'l
35.363ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 15 1991 13:216
    
    Funny how when Brister was the starting QB the Pittsburgh Boys
    (Dan'l and Jake) were talking about how superior he was to Kosar.
    ... now that the guy is picking splinters its "...with Brister the
    Steelers were an easy win for the Browns."  WHAT NEXT?
    
35.364COMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Fri Nov 15 1991 15:034
      All those personals sounds like a brown nosing job to keep his job
    and not be traded....
    
    	tim
35.365Statements without facts only serve to hurt you.SHALOT::MEDVIDNaze koor fateeriFri Nov 15 1991 15:4216
>    Funny how when Brister was the starting QB the Pittsburgh Boys
>    (Dan'l and Jake) were talking about how superior he was to Kosar.
    
    Paul, please repost a note where I ever said Brister was superior to
    Kosar.  Wait, I'll save you some time...and some face.  Don't bother
    looking, because I never said it.
    
    I am on record, however, as saying Kosar is a good QB and I'd love to
    have him on my team.  Now let's just hope you can be man enough to
    admit the same about O'Donnell if and when he attains his potential.
    
    Oh, and congratulations on being able to type JaKe's name and not tag
    it with slanderous personal attacks.  You just might become a better
    person than I thought was within your potential.
    
    	--dan'l
35.366ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 15 1991 15:538
    
    Danny Boy, The Bowling Pin Man is JaKe's REAL NAME!
    
    I will agree right now that O'Donnell is far superior to Brister.
    The guy is big, has a strong arm and can run.  The Steelers may
    have found a gem in this guy.
    
    
35.367CELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinFri Nov 15 1991 17:5723
    I would also like to challenge you, Mr Groanoutski, to find ANYWHERE,
    where I've stated that Brister was a superior QB to Kosar.  I only
    ragged Bernice as bad as I have to tout Mr. whitehaid cause I got sick
    of his "Bernice is the second coming".  Guess Mack came first, eh??
    
    Brister seemed to have all of this potential, yes potential, one word
    that when tagged on a player, makes you watch and watch and wonder what
    the f__k everybody sees that you don't.  He has always been too
    excitable and I personally got tired of waiting for him to develop
    somewhere in the early stages of lasted season.  The guy is a second
    string QB and nothing more.
    
    Brister was quoted as saying that if he's going to be the #2 QB nexted
    year, he wants traded during the off-season to somewhere where he can
    start.  Does Bumfuct Egypt have a football team??????  (8^)*
    
    Re your "SLUR, Mr Groanitout, you claim someone helse hung that on me,
    but when you started using it, that certain someone had never even met
    me.  I first played football with him finally showing up lasted winter,
    you started spewing the offensive slur at least 4 years ago.
    
    JaKe
    
35.368 ;^) "QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 15 1991 18:534
     Oughta turn out the lights on this topic and the Clowns...
    After all the years over for both so called pro football teams!
    
    Big Game
35.369Bring on Houston! I wanna be 4-8!SHALOT::MEDVIDin which case: I'm doomedMon Nov 18 1991 09:5517
    4-7!  Yeeeeehaaaaa!  Go Steelers!  And if they can lose to the Browns
    one more time, they'll get an easier schedule next year to go along
    with their high draft pick (which they will blow, of course).
    
    Steelers were kilt 41-14 by the undefeated Redskins.  Neil O'Donnell
    still continues to impress.  He made one big mistake by grounding the
    ball to kill the clock...ON THIRD DOWN!  That set up a 4th and long. 
    His long passes are pretty much pinpoint.  But the great thing he has
    over Brister is that he takes a look at his secondary receivers if the
    primary one is covered.  Brister never did that.
    
    In watching this team in defeat, I noticed that they do have some very
    good talent.  It's the system that sucks.  The offensive scheme can't
    buy a first down and the defense is wide open for short passes that add
    up to long drives.  Why can't they figure that out?
    
    	--dan'l
35.370CAM::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Mon Nov 18 1991 10:023
35.371GroadyCOMET::JACKSONTAYou forgot the Violin again!!Mon Nov 18 1991 13:093
       Must be to busy deciding which nostril gets it next;^)
    
    	Tim
35.372skins pick/ pick skins ??CELTIK::R_QUINNMon Nov 18 1991 13:2414
    So much for the skins being ripe for the pickin' theory.  That is
    unless of course your referring to Joe nasal skins.  
    
    No running game is eventually going to get O'Donnell killed.  The 2nd
    and 3rd & longs let defense pin their ears back all day long.  The OL
    definitely needs some help as well.
    
    The db's are doing such a bad job of tackling on the short passes and
    just the sheer completion rates were enormous.  They've tried to
    compensate and now the are getting beat deep quite regularly.  A lot 
    of that credit has to go to the defensive line though.  They did apply
    enough pressure to blow up a balloon.
    
    Roy L. 
35.373passed the bird pleaseCNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalMon Nov 18 1991 13:306
 If only Green would learn to concentrate better he again dropped some easy
 balls. This offense needs Foster back bad...Defense needs a pass rusher...
 I need some asprin...

 mike
35.374SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Nov 18 1991 14:3346
    
    	Really, is there a worse team in the league than the Steelers?  If
    there is, I haven't seen them.
    
    	The Steelers are so horrible that yesterday, CBS decided to cut
    from the Steelers game which is the first time I can remember any
    network doing so while the Steelers were playing in over 20 years
    of watching them.
    
    	Again, same old, same old.  Absolutely no offensive game plan at
    all.  Steeler's open up any series with a run, lose 2, then try two
    passes which fail.  Or they might get tricky and run on first and
    second down, only to have 3rd and long.  Game plan?  What game plan?
    
    	Again they waste nearly a quarter and a half in getting the ball
    to Eric Green.  Hey Joe, throw Green the ball on the very first play
    will ya!  No draws, no screens, just terrible play calling.  When
    O'Donnell was being pressured so much, why didn't they try a screen
    or a draw?  This of course brings up another bright spot, the offensive
    line.  Amazing that these guys can even put their pads on correctly.
    Hasselrigg (sp) never played football but yet he's one of the best they
    have which don't say much for the other bodies impersonating football
    players.
    
    	As for the defense, what defense?  The front 4 or 3 or 5 or 2 or
    whatever can't even get close to the QB.  This in turn puts a great
    deal of pressure on the LB's and corners which doesn't help.  Pourous
    is to kind a word for this defense.
    
    	This team is basically in a state of total disarray.  They need
    offensive line help, defensive line help, linebacker help and most of
    all, some coaching help.
    
    	And yes, maybe it is time to say addios to Noll.  All he has done
    is hired a bunch of his old players who really haven't showed they can
    coach, along with hiring the bafoon Walton who can't seem to develop
    a game plan.  Noll is still a decent coach, but maybe he has worn out
    his welcome in Pittsburgh.  Wait till next year just don't cut the
    mustard anymore.  Of course, I'm not a season ticket holder which
    doesn't require me to plunk down 50-60 bucks everytime the Steeler's
    are in town to see a bunch of ex-college dropouts so who am I to
    complain?
    
    	Thank god for hoops season!
    
    								bill..g.
35.375PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Nov 18 1991 14:5715
  re: 374 

        Bill, you hit the nail right on the head with your description
  of the Steeler's in your last note. It was very painful watching the 
  first half of yesterday's game. How many times this season have they 
  converted a 3rd down play only to have it called back with a penalty ?
  The team does have some excellent talent with Green, O'Donnell, Lipps,
  Foster and Woodsen but they are not being utilized. The offensive line 
  may be the worst in pro football. Walton has been a complete disaster.
  I've defended Noll all through the 80's but I'm beginning to think it's 
  time for him to retire and end a great coaching career, head up to the 
  front office and get an entirely new coaching staff made up of mostly
  younger men than they have now.

					Keith
35.376Will Connie Hawkins return ?EARRTH::BROOKSToo legit ! Too legit to quit !Mon Nov 18 1991 16:1710
    re .374
    
    > thank god for hoops season !
    
    What's up Goose ? Did the Pittsburgh Pipers restart their francheise ?
    I didn't hear about that one !
    
    :-)
    
    Doc
35.377Whadda fiasco yesterday was, EH????CELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinMon Nov 18 1991 17:586
    Would the person who left the 11 six year old boys at Three Rivers
    Stadium please return to get them, they are beating the Steelers 35-3.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.37841-14, mirror scoreCELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinMon Nov 18 1991 18:2733
    Lessee, the offense as a whole sucks, the defense as a whole sucks,
    special teams are a fraction of an inch from sucking.  Other than that,
    the team is in pretty good shape.
    
    O'Donnell, I agree with --dan'l, is one of the few bright spots on this
    team.  The guy really appears to have a clue as to what he's doing out
    there.  It's a shame that in this stage of learning, he had to face the
    foreskins yesterday.  He was sacked, what, 5, 6, maybe 7 times????
    The offensive line couldn't keep my grandmother from getting to him,
    AND SHE'S BEEN DEAD SINCE 1976!!!!!!
    
    The defense is one HUGE dissapointment.  Lasted year they were first in
    the AFC, this year, they're trying to become a doormat.  They tried to
    put pressure on Rypien, but he still seemed to have all day, even when
    the Steelers blitzed.  The Foreskins, on the other hand, when they
    blitzed they were on O'Donnell faster than sh!t.  
    
    O'Donnell has a few dumb mistakes to learn from, as --dan'l said, the
    spike on 3rd and whatever with 1:09 left.  Or the interception he threw
    while trying to get the ball to Eric Green.  But overall, I'd rate his
    performance as a B-.  Eric Green gets a C, at best, as he continues to
    drop some balls that MUST be caught.
    
    Oh well, 4-7, same as the Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm), and on their way
    to a high-priced draft pick.  
    
    As to the assertion that the Steelers are the worst team in the league,
    I don't agree, Indy is worse, Wicky-Wacky's Bungholes are worse. 
    That's about it though, but there are some teams playing on the same 
    level as the Steelers, (See Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm))
    
    JaKe
    
35.379FBI WARNING !!!!QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerMon Nov 18 1991 21:207
    re .377
    
     Hey.... !!!  You owe royalities JaKe....  Thats an old Donk Line !
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game
35.380Royalties, ShmoyaltiesCELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinMon Nov 18 1991 22:028
    Nah, Big Game, it's been used here in Pittsburgh since the early '80's,
    plus I've seen it used in numerous different cities, so blow the
    royalties out your.....well you know where.
    
    (8^)*    (8^0*
    
    JaKe
    
35.381A dismal 4-7, headed to 4-12, or 5-11CELTIK::JACOBOne of Several Possible MusiksTue Nov 19 1991 00:4779
Scoring Summary
		1	2	3	4		T
Washington	7	10	10	14		41
STEELERS	0	0	0	14		14

Wash-Riggs 1 yd run(Lohmiller PAT)
Wash-FG Lihmiller 36 yd
Wash-Monk, 11 yd pass from Rypien(Lohmiller PAT)
Wash-FG Lohmiller 41
Wash-Riggs 1 yd run(Lohmiller PAT)
STEELERS-Cooper 5 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Stone 40 pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Wash-Clark 49 yd pass from Rypien(Lohmiller PAT)
Wash-Sanders 40 pass from Rutledge(Lohmiller PAT)

TEAM STATS:
Washington					STEELERS
23			first downs		16
37-97			rushes-yards		14-41
365			Passing yards		241
22-29-0			Compl-Att-Int		23-36-1
0-0			Sacked-yards lost	5-48
1-42			Punts			5-36
2-0			Fumbles-lost		1-1
3-28			Penalties-yards		7-54
37:05			Time of Possession	22:55

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING
Washington: Ervins 23-84, Riggs 5-8, Byner 9-5, 
STEELERS:   Hoge 7-29, Thompson 1-4, O'Donnell 2-4, Foster 4-4

PASSING:
Washington:  Rypien 21-28-0-325 yds, Rutledge 1-1-0-40 yards
STEELERS:    O'Donnell 23-36-1-289

RECEIVING
Washington:  Monk 8-130, Sanders 4-67, Clark 3095, Byner 3-37, Ervins 3-25,
	     Warren 1-11.
STEELERS:    Green 6-73, Stone 4-84, Lipps 4-59, Calloway 4-47, Thompson 2-9,
	     Hoge 2-2, Cooper 1-5.

NOTES:
A comparison of lasted years Steeler defense  at the same point in the season:

Category				1990	1991
3rd down conversions allowed            .395	.487
Total yards				257.2	326.7
Passing yards				156.3	220.9
Passing percentage			.513	.659
Passer rating				54.3	93.6
td-interceptions			9-24	16-8
Points per game				15	24.5



Bubby Brister has said that he has maintained his friendship with O'Donnell,
but "hopefully I can beat him out later on if the job's open."  Noll, however,
gave no indication that it will be open.

Yesterday's game was the 7th consecutive game in which the Steelers failed to
generate a 100 yard rusher or a 100 yard receiver.  It was the 9th consecutive
game that a runner failed to get 100. Barry Foster's 121 yards against Buffalo
was the teams only 100+ yard rushing performance of the season.  
Dwight Stone and Eric Green both had 100 yard receiving performances in
September.
           
The Steelers' QB numbers so far this season

		Compl-Att	Yards	%age	TD	InT	
O'Donnell  	111-194		1453	57.2	10	5
Brister		 81-136		1053	59.6	 6	7


JaKe




35.382QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 19 1991 12:313
    I still say ewe owe me some Bucks $$$$$
    
    Big Game
35.383CELTIK::JACOBOne of Several Possible MusiksTue Nov 19 1991 17:5516
    Lessee, back in .311 I made some predictions on how the Steelers would
    do for the rest of the season, here's how the predictions are holding
    up:
    
    Predicted				Actual result
    Brown(spot)s(tm) win 24-10		'Spots won 17-14
    Donks win 31-13			Donks won 20-13
    Steelers over Bungholes, 21-20	Steelers won, 33-27
    Washington win 42-3			Washington won, 41-14
    
    the scores weren't all that correct but the W/L predictions are 4-0.
    If this keeps up, the Steelers wmay finish the season 6-9-1, although I
    now see the Steelers finishing either 4-12 or 5-11, at best.
    
    JaKe
    
35.384CELTIK::JACOBPgh Surf &amp; Turf=Carp and KolbassiFri Nov 22 1991 18:357
    Dere's a QB controversy brewing here in PGH.  I got an article on
    Brister being pretty PO'd about not getting his starting job back and
    I'll put it in here later if'n I git the chance.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.385He's Out Classed, Out Gunned and Out Of A JOB !QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerFri Nov 22 1991 18:489
    
     Screw the Bum.....   Let him go cry to his mommy about it....
    she is at every game you know !!  
    
     I say make him get his job back the old fashion way....
    
    	EARN IT !!!
    
    Big Game
35.386CELTIK::JACOBPgh Surf &amp; Turf=Carp and KolbassiFri Nov 22 1991 19:0610
    The laugh is, he says he "held this team together" over the lasted 4
    years and doesn't deserve to lose the starting job the way he did.  He
    says he's not a second string QB.  I agree, he's a practice squad QB. 
    He thinks he'll be able to go somewhere else and be ushered into a
    starting job, no questions asked.
    
    I say send him and his mommy into the WLAF!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.387Oilers still have never won a division titleSHALOT::MEDVIDWild-Hearted SonMon Nov 25 1991 12:0023
35.388GRANPA::DFAUSTDon't drink the KoolaidMon Nov 25 1991 12:084
    I hope they can play like that on Thursday. 
    
    Dennis
    
35.389COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Mon Nov 25 1991 13:204
      Snow and cold huh?   Sounds like the wimpy dome team couldn't handle
    it;^)
    
    	Tim
35.390LUNER::BROOKSToo legit ! Too legit to quit !Mon Nov 25 1991 13:487
    Sounds like three straight heart-stoppers were too much,a nd finally
    caught up to the Oilers this week. Since I had to watch the hated
    Cowboys beat Washington, could someone fill me in on the details ?
    
    Thanks,
    
    doc
35.391From what I can remember between pitchersSHALOT::MEDVIDWild-Hearted SonMon Nov 25 1991 15:4139
    I'm sure JaKe will post the stats, Doc, if he's not on vacation this
    week (like a lot of people).
    
    There's no way I would have bet against the Oilers yesterday what with
    Rod Woodson and Eric Green out for the Steelers.  I'm glad I'm not a
    betting man.
    
    Moon was just awful.  He was throwing the ball into the ground, over
    heads, and for the most part where there were no receivers.  He wasn't
    helped much by a perfectly thrown ball that hit Jeffries right in the
    facemask in the endzone and bounced away.  That would have changed the
    game with about eight minutes to play.
    
    The Steelers scored most of their points on drives in which the defense
    had given them the ball.  Pittsburgh still had trouble getting the ball
    into the endzone, but Joe Walton's offense seemed to be confusing the
    hell out of the Oilers.  Merrill Hoge and Barry Foster (until he
    reinjured the ankle) were picking up good ground yardage.  Adrian Cooper
    was a huge offensive threat; Steelers didn't even miss Eric Green.
    
    Dwight Stone is becoming O'Donnell's receiver of choice (though the
    double team on Lipps probably has a lot to do with that).  Stone made a
    great catch on a great 50-yard toss for a TD that was the beginning of
    the end for Houston.
    
    Pittsburgh's secondary was still wide open for short passes.  Like I
    said, if Moon was on the Oilers would have won.  Instead, he was
    throwing right into coverage and got picked five times.  A lot had to
    do with the Steelers' pass rush which it looked like Houston hadn't
    prepared for.  Craig Veasey and Greg Lloyd were all over Moon during
    some of his poorer passing moments.
    
    But the big turning point came when O'Donnell was intercepted in the
    fourth quarter.  The Oilers could have pulled within three.  Instead,
    Moon threw his fifth interception to player-of-the-game Shawn Vincent
    on the very next play.  Vincent ran it back to mid-field and the
    Steelers were able to score again.
    
    	--dan'l
35.392CELTIK::JACOBPgh Surf &amp; Turf=Carp and KolbassiMon Nov 25 1991 18:0026
    Nah, --dan'l, I'm here this week.  UNFORTUNATELY!!!!
    
    I'll get the game stats and scoring summary in tonite, given the
    chance.
    
    Also got a good "Gene Collier" column on the Oilers losing colely
    because of "field position"( the field played in wasn't positioned in
    Houston, ya know the one, the 9 acre controlled environment where they
    win).  Also a good Collier on Bear Hunting.
    
    O'Donnell didn't have a stellar performance, completion percentage in
    the 40%'s, 1 td 1 int.  The cold was accompanied by some gusty winds
    which helped secondaries from both teams yesterday, making some passes
    sail long, and some dive short.  The Steelers found some semblance of a
    pass rush, which suprized the sh_t out of me.  I still look for the
    Steelers to end up, at best, 6-10 this year.  My prediction fo teh
    Oilslicks winning yesterday fell short, but it's a bittersweet
    victory.  The Steelers get a win, but drop in the "draft pick" race.
    
    What was yesterday, BLACK SUNDAY??????????????  Suprised to see all 6
    division leaders fall.
    
    More later
    
    JaKe
    
35.393Steelers 5-7 and going nowhereCELTIK::JACOBFork ItMon Nov 25 1991 22:0144
SCORING SUMMARY
		1	2	3	4		T
Houston		0	7	0	7		14
STEELERS	6	10	7	3		26

STEELERS-FG Anderson 20 yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 28 yd
Oilers-Givins 10 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 33 yd
STEELERS-Stone 43 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Williams 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Oilers-Jeffires 15 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS-FG Anderson 24 yd
A-45,795

TEAM STATISTICS:
Houston						STEELERS
21			1st Downs		16
17-24			Rushes-Yds		39-139
307			Passing Yds		155
24-48-5			Compl-Att-Int		12-29-1
2-17			Sacked-Yds lost		1-0
3-42			Punts			4-39
4-1			Fumbles-Lost		1-1
5-50			Penalties-Yds		5-49
27:50			Time of Possession	32:10

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Oilers: Pinkett 7-18, White 6-9, Moon 3-2, Givins 1-(-5)
STEELERS: Foster 16-60, Hoge 13-54, W.Williams 5-15, O'Donnell 3-9, Stone 1-2,
Thompson 1-(-1).

PASSING:
Oilers: Moon 24-48, 5 ints, 2 tds 324 yds
STEELERS: O'Donnell 12-29, 1 int 1 td 155 yds

RECEIVING:
Oilers: Jeffires 8-122, Duncan 5-62, Givins 4-48, White 4-39, Hill 3-53
STEELERS: Cooper 3-35, Lipps 3-24, Stone 2-48, Hoge 2-22, Cash 1-20, Graham
1-6.

JaKe

35.394CELTIK::JACOBFork ItMon Nov 25 1991 22:3629
    
    The Steelers win was the first win against a team with a winning record
    in the last 11 chances, totalling a span of 728 days.
    
    The Steelers came up with more turnovers(6) than they had in their
    previous six games(5).
    
    Aaron Jones latest temper tantrum didn't draw any flags from the
    officials, but it drew harsh words from head coach Chuck Noll, and
    assistant coaches Joe Greene and George Stewart.  Jones, frustrated,
    smashed his helmet against Gary Anderson's helmet, brakeing Anderson's
    single bar face mask during Houston's fourth qtr TD drive.
    
    The door to the AFC Central division title still runs through
    Pittsburgh after all.  It might be splintered and barely standing, but
    once again, the Oilers couldn't knock it down.
    
    The Oilers are assured of no worse than a tie for the AFC Central div
    title, with four games left and a four game lead over the Steelers and
    Brown(spot)s(tm).
    
    Thomas Everett got a gameball for his two interceptions, but he could
    also have deserved a kick in the backside.  Both interceptions came on
    fourth down plays, and both were inside the Steelers' 20 yard line when
    he picked them off.  Had he knocked them down instead of catching them,
    the Steelers would have gotten good field position in both cases.
    
    JaKe
    
35.395QUASER::HUNTERClean Environment Means Better BeerTue Nov 26 1991 13:116
    
     Jake,  I saw that on the sports channel lasted(tm) night,  I couldn't
    beleive the guy actually grabbed those INT's...  Oh well I suppose
    you get a little excited in the heat of the moment.
    
    Big Game
35.396Now I'm confused but I'm pretty sure this is it...SHALOT::MEDVIDWild Hearted SonWed Nov 27 1991 18:0719
    JaKe, to answer your Q over in the Browns note, I'm pretty darn sure it
    was Malone.
    
    It was the 1984-85 season.  I was a senior at Ohio U.  Pittsburgh was
    the only team to beat SF that year and they were thinking it would be a
    great matchup in the Super Bowl.
    
    The Steelers D won it against Denver.  I remember a crucial
    interception by somebody that sealed it.  Then Pittsburgh went down to
    Miami and played them tough until Marino took the defense  apart in the
    second half.  Malone couldn't move the offense either.
    
    I'm pretty sure it had to be Malone because that was one of the things
    that kept him around well past his time.  People kept bringing up that
    he took the team one game short of the Super Bowl in '85.  
    
    The USFL was in full swing by '85 and Stoudt was playing in Birmingham.
    
    	--dan'l
35.397Moved this to the Steelers NoteCELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobWed Nov 27 1991 19:2340
    All dem years "in decline" seem to run together nowadays seeing as the
    team is sucking the scum water in the bottom of the barrel right
    now(and for the lasted 5 years+).
    
    I think Stoudt played one year after Bradshaw left and then handed the
    reigns over to either Malone or David Woodley, both of whom had short
    undistinguished careers as Steeler starting QB's.
    
    Anyroad, I know O'Donnell is young and prone to the woes that have
    plagued the Steelers with QB's since Terry B. retired, BUT, and that's
    a huge plate-stacker quality BUT, of all the starting QB's that have
    gone thru the Steelers' revolving door, O'Donnell has the best arm, and
    he shows more poise than any of them have at the same point in their
    career.  O'Donnell, before lasted week, was 3rd in the AFC passing, and
    5th overall in the NFL.  Not bad for his "rookie" year.  I use the word
    rookie because he missed training camp lasted year altogether, then
    signed somewhere near midpoint in the season, and got to do a whole lot
    of nothing.  He didn't take a snap until the pre-season games this
    year(against any competition), and fared rather well, He took over for
    Brister and, though his completion percentage is lower than Brister's
    is for THIS year, he has better yardage, plus 11 TD's against 6 int's,
    whilst Brister has 6 TD's vs. 7 int's.  O'Donnell is 2-3 as a starter,
    but those three losses have come during fine performances on
    O'Donnell's part, whilst the defense missed the games totally. 
    O'Donnell has a lot to learn, like when to throw the ball away, but he
    throws deep better than Brister, he hangs in the pocket better than
    Brister, he keeps his cool better than Brister, he got some tangible
    college experience, while Brister played football exactly 1 year in
    college, while opting for baseball instead.
    
    Maybe in a couple of words I'll have to eat these words, and I'll
    gladly do so if I'm wrong, but I think O'Donnell will be able to stand
    with the Marinos, the Kellys, and the Montanas of this league when he
    gets some experience under his hat.  The guy has a great arm, reads the
    defense awful well(so far), is big(6'3", 215+ lbs.), and just seems to
    play sh!tloads better than anyone in Pittsburgh(consistently) over the
    past 8-9 years.
    
    JaKe
    
35.398Info from the official guideSHALOT::MEDVIDWild Hearted SonWed Nov 27 1991 20:1125
    One more thing I remember about the Steelers '84 win over the 49ers is
    that I didn't get to see it.  Going to school in southeastern Ohio, I
    still got to see all the Steelers games broadcast out of Parkersburg, WV
    (Steelers Country).  However, that day the game was pre-empted by the
    MLB playoff game.  I was majorly POed.
    
    Here's what I can piece together from the Steelers Media guide:
    
    	- date of the win against SF was 10-14-84, Steelers won 20-17, and
    	  their record that year was 9-7, good enough to win the AFC
    	  Central.
    
    	- 12-30-84 Steelers beat Broncos in Denver, 24-17, in the AFC
     	  Divisional Playoff.
    
    	- 1-6-85 Steelers lost to Dolphins in Miami, 45-28, in AFC
    	  Championship.
    
    	- Mark Malone was with the Steelers from 80-87.
    
    	- Cliff Stoudt was with the team from 77-83.
    
    Go Steelers.  Beat Dallas tomorrow!
    
    	--dan'l
35.399CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobWed Nov 27 1991 22:3827
    from The Pittsburgh Press, 11-26-1991
    by
    
    Bob Smizik
    
    -It isn't just the so-called negative print media that has been
    critical fo the Steelers.  Even supreme loyalist Myron Cope of WTAE has
    jumped on the Steeelers bashing bandwagon.  In the Nov. 23 issue of
    Steelers Digest, Cope wrote, "The players are not playing, the coaches
    are not getting them to play and the ownership for too many years has
    demonstrated a complacency that leaves this franchise seemingly
    disinterested in improving its roster with astute, aggressive signings
    of Plan B free agents and trades.  Front office paralysis translates
    into paralysis on the field, and now the Steelers have paralysis all
    over the place and little more than the hope of occasionally winning
    close over a fellow stiff."
    
    -As it looks more and more like the Steelers will go with Neil
    O'Donnell as their quarterback, they have a luxury not many teams have:
    a backup QB with decent credentials and plenty of experience.  They
    wouldn't want trade Bubby Brister for just anybody because a team needs
    two good QB's.  But if the offer is attractive, the Steelers should
    listen.  With all of their glaring needs, not to do so would be
    foolish.
    
    JaKe
    
35.400HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Mon Dec 02 1991 09:513
       Why do the Steelers have those cars parked along side the field at
    Three Rivers?
                                           Denny
35.401CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobMon Dec 02 1991 17:5611
    Cause stadium parking sucks at 3 Rivers!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    Actually, your guess is as good as mine, but one of them is some kind
    of Chrysler or another and is designated as the official "car" of the
    Pettsburgh Steelers.  Seems right that it's a Chrysler with the
    Steelers, both are in the sh!thole!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.402CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobMon Dec 02 1991 18:1726
    Dem Steelers sucked BIG TIME .vs. the DallAss Cryboys on Turkey day.
    
    20-10 loss, the bozos should lose the rest of their games and go for
    the higher picks in the draft, but, as usual, they'll get somebody,
    he'll hold out for 6-10 weeks, Noll will say the guy has no chance to
    help the team, the guy will then proceed to play and play great, then
    the nexted year he'll break his leg or arm or get nailed for cocaine or
    smack up his car and get paralyzed or just stink the joint up.  Why
    not, that's what happens to all of the other Steelers' #1's.
    
    O'Donnell didn't look very good Thursday, but then neither did the rest
    of the team.  The offense stunk, the defense stunk, too, but not quite
    as bad, the special teams stunk, Dermonti Dawson ESPECIALLY, with the
    lousy snaps.  Gary Anderson's miss on the 50+ yard field goal attempt
    was the worst I've EVER seen him kick a ball, MAJOR SHANK!!
    
    Lessee, when will Chuck Noll get fired??????
    Should be this week, but knowing the way Dan Rooney exercises his
    strangle hold on the Steelers it'll be just after the season ends,
    
    In 2015, after the Steelers 15th consecutive non-winning season.  And
    only then because Noll refuses to sign over his Social Security
    payments to the team.
    
    JaKe
    
35.403CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobTue Dec 03 1991 00:0148
SCORING SUMMARY:
		1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS	0	0	3	7		10
Cowboys		7	3	0	10		20

Cowboys--E.Smith 6 yd run(Willis PAT)
Cowboys--FG Willis 19 yd
STEELERS-FG Anderson 42 yd
Cowboys--FG Willis 43 yd
STEELERS-W.Williams 3 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Cowboys--Irvin 66 yd pass from Beuerlein(Willis PAT)
A-62,253

TEAM STATS:
STEELERS					Dallas
17			1st Downs		20
21-65			Rushes-yds		35-116
134			passing yds		181
17-36-0			Compl-Att-Int		14-25-0
3-33			Sacked-Yds Lost		4-36
4-39			Punts			2-38
3-1			Fumbles-lost		0-0
6-50			Penalties-Yds		2-29
25:45			Time of Possession	34:15

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: W.Williams 8-59, Hoge 9-9, O'Donnell 1-1, Stryzinski 2-0, Foster
	  1-(-4).
Dallas: E.Smith 32-109, Johnston 2-8, Beuerlein 1-(-1).

PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 17-36-0 167 yds.
Dallas: Beuerlein 14-25-0 217 yds

RECEIVING:
STEELERS:  Lipps 5-54, Williams 4-33, Stone 3-39, Cooper 2-18, Cash 2-15, Hoge
	   1-8.
Dallas:  Irvin 8-157, E.Smith 3-19, martin 1-23, Awalt 1-12, Roberts 1-6.





JaKe



35.404CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobTue Dec 03 1991 00:1725
    Was it just me or did Jeff Graham, rookie wide receiver and 1st round
    pick, give up on a VERY catchable ball on the far sideline lasted
    Thursday????   O'Donnell threw to Graham on a fly pattern, only to have
    the ball barely graze off of Graham's SLIGHTLY outstretched arms.  A
    little dive froward would have made the ball extremely catchable.  If
    it had been Lynn Swann or John Stallworth, some sort of move other than
    just letting the ball fall JUST in front of the receiver would have
    been made.  I now question Graham's ability to stand up and be counted
    as a bona-fide pro wide receiver.  The guy ain't showed me much before
    this game, but he showed me even less during the game.  Another #1
    draft pick gone bust.
    
    FWIW, Chuck Noll said that if things keep going the way they are, he
    may "get on with his life" after the season is over if that's what is
    required of him.   I think he's hinting at the fact that he'll retire
    if asked to, or possibly move up into the front office.  There was a
    time that I thought Noll sat up there near God, but lately, with the
    teams he is fielding, I think it's time to say so long Chuckie baby,
    it's been real, then go out and hire some young coahc with some
    innovative ideas, and get on with the business of returning to winning
    form.
             
    
    JaKe
    
35.405CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobTue Dec 03 1991 00:2227
    TRIVIA INVOLVING THE STEELERS(answers at end)
    
    1.)  What do the following have in common?????
    	a) Man inventing the wheel
    	b) Dinosaurs becoming extinct
    	c) Democrats winning the White House
    	d) The Steelers winning the AFC Central Division
    
    2.)  What's a big play???
    
    3.)  What's special about the Steelers' special teams????
    
    4.)  Why do Steeler fans paint "J_E Must Go" banners????
    
    Answers:
    
    1.)  They're all ancient history
    
    2.)  Something the other teams make
    
    3.)	They're especially bad
    
    4.)  There's no "O" in Steelers.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.406COMET::JACKSONTAWhy ask why? Because thats why!Tue Dec 03 1991 15:244
      If Chuck retires,  does this mean the nose man gets the directors
    chair?
    
    	Tim
35.407QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 03 1991 17:106
     If so...  The Steelers won't see a winning season till JaKe 
    buys the team and fires the gold digger himself !!
    
    ;^0
    
    Big Game
35.408CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobTue Dec 03 1991 17:559
    MeThinks if Da Emperor Chas. Noll leaves, most of the coaching staff
    will be gonzo as soon as whoever gets the head job gets the go ahead to
    hire his own assistants.  MeAlso Thinks that J_E B__GER WALT_N will be
    pounding the pavement looking for a job, maybe even being the Offensive
    Coordinator for Dr. Midwife's fag, er I mean Flag football team!!
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.409CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobWed Dec 04 1991 23:0850
    More on Noll and retirement.
    
    Noll was asked at his Monday press conference if he plans to retire
    after this season.  He replied that he would step aside at the end of
    the season if asked to do so.
    
    Dan Rooney, Steelers President, declined to discuss the subject with
    rreporters.
    
    Tom Donahoe, the Steelers director of football development, said Noll
    would be evaluated at the end of the season, just like every other
    coach on the staff.
    
    This was the first time Noll addressed questions about his future, but
    not the first time he has been asked them.
    
    In Oct. '88, after the Steelers started 1-6, Noll was asked at his news
    conference if he would consider resigning at the end of the season. 
    Noll laughed and cut off the reporter saying, "I won't even answer that
    question," and then abruptly walked out of the room.  The Steelers
    finished 5-11 that season.  The next season they came within 2 points
    of acvancing to the AFC Championship game.  Noll was selected AFC Coach
    of the year in 1989.
    
    Monday, while asked some questions about his future, he was asked if he
    plans to return next year, to which he replied, "That's something we'll
    talk about after this is all over."
    
    Noll has maintained since training camp that the Steelers have
    championship talent and have more talent than the 1989 team that lost
    to the Broncos, 24-23.  With 3 games remaining, the Steelers are 5-8
    and are looking at a slimn possibility of finishing .500 at the very
    best.  Noll said that this has been the most disappointing of his 23
    seasons with the Steelers.
    
    Noll:  "It has because I had real high aspirations for this team.  I
    thought we could get done what we had to and overcome the problems you
    would have through a year."
    
    If the Steelers lose their final 3 games, they would finish with a 5-11
    record, same as in 1988 when Rooney ordered Noll to fire several
    assistant coaches at the end fo the season. Noll balked and nearly
    resigned in protest, but eventually agreed.
    
    Noll dodged a question Monday when asked about his staff's performance,
    "When you've lost as many games as we've lost, the blame comes right
    here, on me.  And I'm the only one that has to answer for it."
    
    JaKe
    
35.410O'Donnell's got to go!SHALOT::MEDVIDSteeeempy, you eeeediot!Fri Dec 06 1991 16:0214
    Ohmagawd!!!  I just realized something.  Neil O'Donnell cannot be
    allowed to start anymore for the Steelers.  Before Brister got injured,
    the four starting QBs in the AFC Central were named:
    
    	Warren
    	Norman
    	Bernie
    	Walter
    
    Neil has just too normal a first name to be allowed to continue at QB in
    this division.  Sorry, Neil.
    
    	--dan'l
    	
35.411PTOVAX::JACOBFat, Dumb, and Happy!!!Mon Dec 09 1991 17:5323
    The Steelers were so bad in the House of the Braindead yesterday,
    Brister refused to play in the fourth quarter.  It seems that with the
    score, 24-6, J_e Walt_n told Brister to warm up 'cause he was going in. 
    Brister promptly refused saying he was no rookie needing playing time
    and also that O'Donnell wasn't hurt so nothing could be accomplished by
    him going in.  Brister then said he didn't want to go ninto a
    game(unless O'Donnell got hurt) unless the score was 0-0.
    
    Noll said he understood the reason Brister didn't want to go in late
    was his knee was too stiff and sore.   Brister has also sasid he will
    not sign a contract with the Steelers unless he will be a starter.(this
    is the lasted year of Brister's contract)
    
    O'Donnell made almost all of the mistakes that a developing QB can
    make.  Fumbles, throwing into a crowd, going OB when the 1st donw stick
    is a dive away.  I still feel that this kid is the future of the
    Steelers offense, though.  Just gotta work the inexperience out of him.
    
    5-9 and headed for a high draft pick, although I see the Steelers MAYBE
    beating the Bungholes or the BrownTurds in one of the final two games.
    
    JaKe
    
35.412That's got to be it for Chuck, sorry to saySHALOT::MEDVIDsing your lifeMon Dec 09 1991 18:2620
>Just gotta work the inexperience out of him.
    
    Well, with the way the offensive line lets the defense pour into the
    backfield, O'Donnell should be worked enough to be experienced and
    heading for retirement by week 16.
    
    The game was televised here in Charlotte after a viewer pole pre-empted
    the Browns-Broncos game because more people called in for the
    Steelers-Oilers.  How embarrasing!
    
    And the worst part is, by the end of the third quarter I was wanting to
    watch Denver beat up on Cleveland instead.  
    
    I'm not one for "ifs" and "buts" like Hal, "but if" Lewis Lipps doesn't
    fumble that ball after the second quarter catch, I think the Steelers
    would have won.  That play took them out of the game mentally. 
    Actually, I'm not convinced he ever had possession...but who cares now? 
    We're going for the high draft pick! 
    
    	--dan'l
35.413Steelers 5-9 headed for 5-11 or 6-10, Bye ChuckPTOVAX::JACOBFat, Dumb, and Happy!!!Mon Dec 09 1991 22:2542
SCORING SUMMARY:
		1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS	0	3	3	0		6
Houston		7	3	7	14		31

Hou-Pinkett 7 yd run(Del Greco PAT)
Hou-FG Del Greco 24yd
PGH-FG Anderson 54 yd
Hou-Jeffires 16 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
PGH-FG Anderson 36 yd
Hou-Pinkett 11 yd run(Del Greco PAT)
Hou-A.Smith 70 yd fumble return(Del Greco PAT)
A=59,225

TEAM STATISTICS:
STEELERS					Houston
14		1st Downs			23
23-85		Rushes-Yards			22-117
147		Passing Yds			233
16-30-1		Compl-Att-Int			24-38-1
7-41		Sacked-Yds Lost			3-23
6-44		Punts				4-47
4-3		Fumbles-lost			3-1
8-62		Penalties-Yards			5-40
30:02		Time of Possession		29:58

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS: W.Williams 4-39, Thompson 10-23, Hoge 8-18, O'Donnell 1-5.
Houston: Pinkett 16-98, White 2-21, Moon 1-0, Carlson 1-(-2).

PASSING:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 16-30-1 int 0tds, 188 yards
Houston: Moon 23-36-1, 1 TD, 254 yards, Carlson 1-2-0 4 yards

RECEIVING: 
STEELERS: Lipps 6-71, Thompson 6-67, Cooper 3-41, Hoge 1-9.
Houston: Hill 8-97, Jeffires 6-77, Givins 5-44, Pinkett 2-4, Coleman 1-4.


JaKe

35.414PTOVAX::JACOBFat, Dumb, and Happy!!!Mon Dec 09 1991 22:3229
    --dan'l, i gotta agree with ya to an extent on the Lipps fumble.
    Although I think he caught it, if he doesn't fumble the ball, I think
    the Steelers make a game of it.  It did seem to take the wind out of
    their sails, though.
    
    Gary Anderson's 54 yards field goal, which would have gone through from
    60+ yards, was the second longest in Steeler history, with the longest
    being 55 yards by Anderson on Nov 24, 1984.
    
    Anderson's 2 field goals yesterday made him just the 19th player in NFL
    history to go over 1,000 career points.
    
    Rookie WR Jeff Graham made a couple of BONEHAID plays.  The first in
    fielding a punt at the 7 which probably would have gone into the
    endzone.  The second in signalling for a fair catch and then running
    with the ball, drawing a penalty which backed the Steelers up within
    their own 5 yard line.  I don't know, but Graham is a first round pick
    and he looks like SH!T to me.  The guy hasn't shown me anything to be
    hopeful about, either.
    
    The roughing the passer call on Jerrol Williams was the biggest crock
    of horse manure i've ever seen.  Moon had JUST released the ball and
    Williams, who was already airborne, knocks Moonie out of bounds and
    gets flagged for roughing, and the drive stays alive and the Oilscum
    score a few plays later.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.415Stats aren't everything, but....COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterTue Dec 10 1991 07:555
      Looking at the stats, it seems the turnovers and sacks killed the
    sqeelers.  I didn't see the game,  but when you have those types of
    problems,  you will normally lose....
    
    	Tim
35.4165-11 wouldn't bring me tears!!CELTIK::R_QUINNTue Dec 10 1991 11:4212
    
    Jake,
    
    Isn't Graham a number 2 round pick.  Richardson being #1.  I think
    Lloyd and Williams are developing well at the outside linebacker
    positions.  The DLman out of Washington sounds a winner to me but I am
    sure he won't be available at the steeler pick.  Steelers should be
    able to get something for Brister the way the nfl is hurting for
    quarterbacks.  He actually did look good in the simplified offensive
    scheme of Tom Moore.  The OL has looked horrid the last two games.
    
    Roy L.
35.417PTOVAX::JACOBFat, Dumb, and Happy!!!Tue Dec 10 1991 17:3516
    Yeah, Roy, come to think of it Graham is a second rounder, but still
    looks like a SLOF, IMHO.  
    
    Re Brister
    
    Noll, as of his news conference didn't know about Brister's "refusal",
    an said he thought Brister's knee was bothering him.  Noll said he
    would be scheduling a meeting with Brister immediately to resolve the
    matter.  When asked if Brister would be disciplined or fined, Noll said
    no, that his speaking out is part of his freedom of speech protected by
    the first amendment.  He did say, though, that it looks like O'Donnell
    will be the starter for the lasted two games of the season here in Pgh,
    against the Bungholes and the BrownTurds.
    
    JaKe
    
35.418PTOVAX::JACOBDasher, Dancer, Donner and BLITZED!!Thu Dec 12 1991 00:0945
    Word has it that Tim Worley will be activated for Sunday's game against
    the Cincy Bungholes.
    
    Terry Long is not expected to be activated.
    
    Noll had his meeting with Brister yesterday over Brister's comments and
    refusal to warm up and go in the drudgery in the a$$h_ledome.  The
    meeting, it was reported, lasted less than 5 minutes and Noll said
    afterward it was a 2-way meeting, and not a good old a$$-chewing.
    
    Warren Williams, who carried the ball only 4 times but ran for 39
    yards, had been sick with the flu earlier in the week and left the game
    after becoming sick.  Williams, IMHO, other than when he had his bout
    with fumble-itis, is one good running back who, when called upon toi
    fill the void left by injury/suspension, always seems to come thru. 
    Over his career, Williams averages 1 TD for every 14 times he gets the
    ball, pass or run.
    
    I know I've been down on Worley earlier this season, BUT, I truly hope
    the guy turns his life around and keeps himself on the right path.  An
    article here in Pittsburgh about Worley(the wife threw it out, dammit)
    qouted him as saying he was crying out for help while hooked on the
    booze and cocaine.  I truly believe it must be hard to step into the
    limelight and have all those HUGE expectations dropped on your back. 
    First he holds out, gets the big bucks, then comes in and runs good for
    a while, then develops fumble-itis, gets hurt, gets suspended during
    training camp for drugs(unpublicized by the league cause he was a first
    time offender), has a business that is in financial deep do-do and
    being investigated, loses starting(and second string) jobs, gets
    injured and accused of faking it, gets arrested for drunk driving, and
    suspended for 4 weeks by the league for failing second cocaine test.
    
    The guy has been in the pitts, but I hope if he plays Sunday, he gets a
    decent reception by the fans in Three Rivers.  I know his recent
    escapades have been textbook How-Not-To, but it's a proven fact that
    some people just can't handle the pressures and turn to drugs and
    alcohol.  
    
    I only wish Tim Worley the best in his football career and in keeping
    himself off of the substances.  Everybody deserves a second chance, and
    this is Worley's.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.419Uncle Al will come callingSHALOT::MEDVIDsing your lifeThu Dec 12 1991 11:2811
>    gets suspended during
>    training camp for drugs(unpublicized by the league cause he was a first
>    time offender), has a business that is in financial deep do-do and
>    being investigated, loses starting(and second string) jobs, gets
>    injured and accused of faking it, gets arrested for drunk driving, and
>    suspended for 4 weeks by the league for failing second cocaine test.
    
    Sounds like the perfect Raider to me.
    
    	--dan'l
    
35.420QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 12 1991 12:207
     JaKe...  Why activate  the guy...  It's not like
    the Squeelers are going to the playoffs or anything.
    
    
    HHHHAAAAAAA!!!!
    
    Big Game
35.421PTOVAX::JACOBDasher, Dancer, Donner and BLITZED!!Thu Dec 12 1991 17:5512
    First of all, Worley was suspended for 6 weeks, not the 4 weeks I
    originally put in here.
    
    Secondly, BOTH Worley and Long are expected to be activated for
    Sunday's game with the Bungholes, but Long still has some tenderness in
    his elbow, which may keep him out of the game.
    
    Thirdly, Mr. Big'n'Lame, go back-off in your own jack yard.
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
35.422QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Dec 12 1991 18:385
    Now Now, JaKe...
    
     That could be promoting un-safe sex !!   ;^)
    
    BG
35.423FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Dec 13 1991 10:477
    Open letter to Jake.
    
    Yo.  I've got the information you requested but I cain't send it to you
    since you've maxed out your disk quota.  Clear some space and I'll send
    it along.  
    
    Ninj
35.424ninj, send it to Hawk instead!CST17::FARLEYfeed your Xmas Drood(tm) BethleHAM and CheeseFri Dec 13 1991 10:501
    
35.425PTOVAX::JACOBPlayin with the box the kids came inFri Dec 13 1991 23:3611
    Read in today's paper that the indy Colts have incluede J_e Walt_n(no
    "O") in their list of prospective head coaches.  Show they don't have a
    clue at what they'll have to do to turn their team around, Eh??
    
    Will Sunday's meeting between the Steelers and the Cincy Bungholes be
    the lasted meeting between Noll and Wicky Wacky Wyche?????
    
    Both are in danger of losing their jobs after the season ends.
    
    JaKe
    
35.426Steelers are now 6-9, and tied with the 'SpotsPTOVAX::JACOBPlayin with the box the kids came inMon Dec 16 1991 23:5562
SCORING SUMMARY
         	1	2	3	4		T
Bungholes	0	7	3	0		10
STEELERS	10	0	0	7		17

STEELERS-Cooper 47 yd pas from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS-Anderson 47 yd FG
Cincy-	Fulcher 27 yd interception return(Breech PAT)
Cincy-	Breech 39 yd FG
STEELERS-Cash 19 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
A-35,420

TEAM STATS:

Cincy					STEELERS
13		1st Downs		18
26-75		Rushes-Yards		36-149
120		Passing Yds		177
14-26-2		Compl-Att-Int		15-28-2
1-5		Sacked-Yds lost		1-7
5-40		Punts			1-54
3-0		Fumbles-Lost		4-3
5-30		Penalties-Yards		7-64	
27:31		Time of Possession	32:29

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Cincy--Green 18-62, Brooks 6-11, Esiason 2-2
STEELERS--Hoge 16-79, W.Williams 6-35, Worley 6-33, Brister 5-12, Thompson 1-1,
	Stryzinski 2-(-1)

PASSING:
Cincy--Esiason 14-26 2 INT, 125 yards
STEELERS--Brister 15-28 2 INT, 2 TD's, 184 yards.

RECEIVING:
Cincy--Brown 5-50, Barber 3-27, Green 2-29, Holman 2-5, Brooks 1-9, Taylor 1-5
STEELERS--Cash 4-55, Hoge 4-33, Lipps 3-33, W.Williams 2-2, Cooper 1-47, Mills
	1-14.


Tim Worley, who had not, before this week,  practiced with the Steelers since
August, gained 33 yards on 6 carries(5.5/carry) but fumbled the ball away on
his first carry of the game.  He said he got encouragement on the sidelines
from the coaches and fellow players and returned to the game.

The local Pittsburgh papers, both the Press and the Post-Gazette "hailed"
Brister and said he resurected the offense.  I don't know what game they were
watching, but in the Steeler-Bengal game I watched, if the Steelers had a
competent QB at the helm, they would have won 42-3.  Personally, I think the
Steelers played Brister to showcase him for a possible off-season trade.
Brister is the probable starter for nexted Sunday's game .vs. the 'Spots.
Brister, in 7 prior meeting vs the Bungholes, was 0-7.

Noll hinted in his news conference today that he may not return nexted season
to coach the Steelers.  When asked if he would consider coaching another team,
Noll said emphatically, "NO!!".

JaKe



35.427QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Dec 17 1991 12:4110
>   <<< Note 35.426 by PTOVAX::JACOB "Playin with the box the kids came in" >>>
>              -< Steelers are now 6-9, and tied with the 'Spots >-
    
    
     For what, JaKe ...  The worst team in the NFL in the weakest 
    divison with a Bozo nose picking fool for an offensive coordinator ?
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game
35.428PTOVAX::JACOBPlayin with the box the kids came inTue Dec 17 1991 18:1610
    
    >> For what, JaKe ...  The worst team in the NFL in the weakest 
    >>divison with a Bozo nose picking fool for an offensive coordinator ?
    
    Hey watch it, Big'n'Lame,
    
    The Steelers resemble that remark!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.429PTOVAX::JACOBPlayin with the box the kids came inTue Dec 17 1991 18:297
    The Chuck Noll retirement watch is now at T-Minus 1 game and counting.
    	
    Any prognostications on what day eh'll announce his retirement, OR get
    fired????
    
    JaKe
    	
35.430RAVEN1::B_ADAMSTime for F.A.R.T. again!Tue Dec 17 1991 19:294
    
    	He'll stay...with Joe headed out the door.
    
    B.A.
35.431PTOVAX::JACOBPlayin with the box the kids came inTue Dec 17 1991 19:3212
    In his weekly news conference, he sounded like he may just say "to hell
    with it", and get on with his life's work after the season ends.
    
    If he stays, expect an almost complete change in the coaching staff
    under him.
    
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
    
35.432QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Dec 18 1991 13:204
     I for one won't be suprised to see him take his leave...
    He's hung in for a long time.
    
    BG
35.433Big day in PittsburghSHALOT::MEDVIDCooler than JesusThu Dec 26 1991 12:3512
    Today is the day Chuck Noll meets with Dan Rooney.  It is speculated
    that one of two things will happen:
    
    	- Noll will retire.
    
    	- Noll will continue as Steelers head coach but the coaching staff
    	  will undergo a major overhaul with Joe Walton being the first out
    	  the door.
    
    Either way, Walton is gone.  Sounds good to me.
    
    	--dan'l
35.434Pay for Performance?????CELTIK::R_QUINNThu Dec 26 1991 13:2018
    
    According to a NFL survey the Steelers have the lowest total base
    salary $13,229,500 & total salaries(bonuses and incentives) $17,256,100
    in the league.
    
    A look at AFC central:
    
    	Clevaland	Houston 	Cincinnati	Steelers
    
    * $21,018,500(5) $19,453,500(10)   $20,756,800(8)  $13,229,500(28)
    
    % $28,348,750(2) $23,245,500(13)   $23,073,800(14) $17,256,100(28)
    
    * Total Base  %Total Salaries
    
    Individual numbers on the way.
    
    Roy L.
35.435Just the way the Rooneys are...SHALOT::MEDVIDCooler than JesusThu Dec 26 1991 13:237
>                         -< Pay for Performance????? >-
    
    The Steelers have historically been the lowest paying team in the
    NFL...even during the super bowl years.  This is nothing new and is not
    based on the recent lack of team performance.  
    
    	--dan'l
35.436Individual salariesCELTIK::R_QUINNThu Dec 26 1991 18:0673
POS      NAME               SALARY    POS      NAME             SALARY
DB  Rod Woodson       $1,000,000      QB  Bubby Brister       $900,000     
WR  Louis Lipps         $750,000      LB  David Little        $650,000     
LB  Greg Lloyd          $410,000      RB  Merril Hoge         $400,000     
TE  Mike Mularkey       $350,000      LB  Brian Hinkle        $350,000     
RB  Tim Worley          $350,000      OL  Tunch Ilkin         $350,000     
PK  Gary Anderson       $350,000      LB  Huey Richardson     $325,000     
DL  Keith Willis        $325,000      DL  Gerald Williams     $300,000     
DB  David Johnson       $300,000      TE  Eric Green          $300,000     
OL  Terry Long          $277,000      DL  Aaron Jones         $275,000     
DB  Delton Hall         $275,000      OL  Tom Ricketts        $250,000     
LB  Hardy Nickerson     $236,300      OL  John Jackson        $225,000     
OL  Dermotti Dawson     $220,000      WR  Jeff Graham         $220,000     
DB  Carnell Lake        $220,000      DL  Kenny Davidson      $210,000     
WR  Ernie Mills         $200,000      DB  Thomas Everett      $194,300  
QB  Neil O'Donnell      $185,000      WR  Dwight Stone        $176,000     
QB  Rick Strom          $165,000      LB  Jerry Olsavsky      $160,000     
DL  Craig Veasey        $160,000      OL  Dean Caliguire      $150,000     
LB  Rob McGovern        $145,000      OL  Brian Blankenship   $145,000     
DB  Larry Griffin       $137,000      DB  Richard Shelton     $135,000     
P   Dan Stryzinski      $132,000      DB  Sammy Walker        $125,000     
TE  Adrian Cooper       $125,000      LB  Jerrol Williams     $120,000     
RB  Leroy Thompson      $115,000      WR  Chris Callaway      $115,000     
DL  Donald Evans        $110,000      RB  Barry Foster         $97,500  
OL  Dean Dingman         $95,000      OL  Carlton Haselrig     $90,000     
LB  Jeff Brady           $90,000      DB  Gary Jones           $88,500  
OL  Justin Strzelczyk    $85,000      DB  Shawn Vincent        $75,000     
DB  Kevin Smith          $65,000     
			    Pay by Position

POS    NAME               SALARY      POS    NAME               SALARY
DB  Rod Woodson         $1,000,000    DB  David Johnson         $300,000
DB  Delton Hall           $275,000    DB  Carnell Lake          $220,000
DB  Thomas Everett        $194,300    DB  Larry Griffin         $137,000
DB  Richard Shelton       $135,000    DB  Sammy Walker          $125,000
DB  Gary Jones             $88,500    DB  Shawn Vincent          $75,000
DB  Kevin Smith            $65,000

DL  Keith Willis          $325,000    DL  Gerald Williams       $300,000
DL  Aaron Jones           $275,000    DL  Kenny Davidson        $210,000
DL  Craig Veasey          $160,000    DL  Donald Evans          $110,000

LB  David Little          $650,000    LB  Greg Lloyd            $410,000
LB  Brian Hinkle          $350,000    LB  Huey Richardson       $325,000
LB  Hardy Nickerson       $236,300    LB  Jerry Olsavsky        $160,000
LB  Rob McGovern          $145,000    LB  Jerrol Williams       $120,000
LB  Jeff Brady             $90,000

OL  Tunch Ilkin           $350,000    OL  Terry Long            $277,000
OL  Tom Ricketts          $250,000    OL  John Jackson          $225,000
OL  Dermotti Dawson       $220,000    OL  Dean Caliguire        $150,000
OL  Brian Blankenship     $145,000    OL  Dean Dingman           $95,000
OL  Carlton Haselrig       $90,000    OL  Justin Strzelczyk      $85,000

P   Dan Stryzinski        $132,000    PK  Gary Anderson         $350,000

QB  Bubby Brister         $900,000    QB  Neil O'Donnell        $185,000
QB  Rick Strom            $165,000

RB  Merril Hoge           $400,000    RB  Tim Worley            $350,000
RB  Leroy Thompson        $115,000    RB  Barry Foster           $97,500

TE  Mike Mularkey         $350,000    TE  Eric Green            $300,000
TE  Adrian Cooper         $125,000

WR  Louis Lipps           $750,000    WR  Jeff Graham           $220,000
WR  Ernie Mills           $200,000    WR  Dwight Stone          $176,000
WR  Chris Callaway        $115,000

Very few skilled position players are paid well but also very few have 
performed well.  Few all star players few all star salaries!!!

Roy L.
35.437A little analysisCELTIK::R_QUINNThu Dec 26 1991 18:1312
    RE: -2
    
    I agree with the Rooney's.  Those players that have been all-stars a
    number of years are making the most money i.e. Woodson, Lipps, Little 
    and Brister although he hasn't quite panned out.  Brister still may
    flourish in a less complicated offense.  Tunch Ilkin has been an All
    Pro lineman and he still only gets $350K(relative of other All Pro
    linemen).  There are a number of teams with big salaries that have
    traditionally been below the steelers in wins.   However that could be
    related to all the high draft choices(Indianapolis).
    
    Roy L.
35.438Knoll Retires!!!!CELTIK::R_QUINNThu Dec 26 1991 19:2110
    I heard on the radio seconds ago that Knoll has indeed retired!!!  He
    is outta there.  I did like Knoll very much as far as his philosphies
    went.  He did one thing over the last few years that didn't help him a
    whole lot though; he gave his assistants to much reign(coordinators). 
    He always took the criticism but J_e Waltons offense just never panned
    out.  With his leaving though.  Who would be a suitable replacement.  I
    hope it is a balanced aggressive coach type.
    
    Roy L. Quinn
    x31141
35.439coaches never retire, they just go to the booth...CNTROL::CHILDSBang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang!Fri Dec 27 1991 10:2513
 for all the offense he's produced over the years Gary Anderson is one under
 paid dude....

 too bad Chuck couldn't have gone out on winning note. he definately was one
 of the all time great player/coaches in the game. 

 I do agree his assistants have hurt him. Despite spending some high draft 
 picks on the DL, Joe Greene hasn't done much with em....

 think he'll make a good analyst?

 mike
35.440Just came in to get me paycheck, todayPTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementFri Dec 27 1991 11:2017
    
    
    THE EMPEROR IS DEAD!!
    
       LONG LIVE THE EMPEROR!!!!!
    
    Noll said it would've been nice to go out on a winning note, but that's
    the breaks.
    
    To all of you louses out there,
    
    HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!
    
    I'm outta here til nexted thursday.
    
    JaKe
    
35.441Knew it was coming, but my heart is still heavy todaySHALOT::MEDVIDCooler than JesusFri Dec 27 1991 11:3428
> too bad Chuck couldn't have gone out on winning note. 
    
    It wasn't a winning season, but he did go out on a winning note.  The
    Steelers beat Cinci and Cleveland in their last two games.  The players
    gave Noll the game ball after the Cleveland win obviously thinking it
    would be his last game.
    
    At least he was allowed to call his own shots on his retirement, unlike
    the Dallas debacle.  Noll and Landry were the last of the career
    coaches.  Noll had 23 years with the Steelers and no one else.
    
> I do agree his assistants have hurt him. Despite spending some high draft 
> picks on the DL, Joe Greene hasn't done much with em....
    
    According to ESPN's SportsCenter, Joe Green is the first man in line to
    succeed Noll.  The front office is concerned about Green's lack of head
    coaching experience...take a look at Art Shell, Rooneys.
    
    Myself, I wish Schottenheimer were available.  He was a player under
    Noll and he is from Pittsburgh...went to highschool with my uncle and
    won the state championship in basketball with him.
    
    I won't complain if they give Green a shot as long as Walton is gone. 
    I'll tell you one thing, I wouldn't want to be a referee and make a bad
    call against head coach Joe Green.  Yowza, what an ear licking that
    would cause.
    
    	--dan'l
35.442Chuck-- getting on with his lifes work???CELTIK::R_QUINNFri Dec 27 1991 12:1733
    I would be highly surprised if Chuck heads to the booth.  I don't think
    Chuck likes pandering to an audience to much.  I could be wrong but it 
    could indeed be worse with a TV audience.  But who am I to say, all the 
    other coaches seem to like the booth.
    
    When times were really hard, fans have called for Knoll's head but not
    many wanted to see him actually go.  Although he will still have to go
    down in history as a Great coach (4SB winners) he was never awarded the 
    "Coach of the Year" award.  
    
    I as Dan'l stated liked the fact that it appeared to be knoll's choice. 
    He didn't look to be upset or mad about the situation but did harbor
    the disappointment of not having 10 wins and being in the playoffs.
    
    Replacement:
    
    Greene -- ESPN does say he is the leading candidate with very little
    competition behind him.  My concern is basically with the offense.  I
    has been so dismal over the last few years and it make your defense
    look much worse than it is. I.E. long stints on the field.  I'm for
    Greene but where would the offensive coordinator come from.
    
    AFC Central Coaches of Past Few Years
    
    Pitt-Knoll	Clev-Belicheck	Cinn-Wyche	Hou-Pardee
    		    -Carson	    -?????	   -Glanville
    		    -Schottenhiemer -?????	   -????????
                    -Rutigliano	    -?????	   -Phillips
    
    Sam and Chuck held the fort the longest also the only Superbowl
    participants as coaches.  Can anybody fill in the blanks.
    
    Roy L.
35.443FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Dec 27 1991 12:2214
    At least one of the Houston coaches between Bum Phillips and Jerry
    Glanville was Hugh Campbell, who had been Warren Moon's coach up at
    Edmonton.  They had at least one interim coach in there, who I believe
    was Chuck Studley.
    
    Cincinnati's first coach was Paul Brown and then he was replaced by
    Bill "Tiger" Johnson, in the move that in turn caused Bill Walsh to
    move out to the West Coast, first to San Diego, then Stanford and then
    finally San Francisco.  Tiger was replaced by Forrest Gregg, who
    coached them to their first Super Bowl appearance.  When Gregg left to
    go to Green Bay, Wyche replaced him.
    
    John
                      
35.444Greatest Coach Ever: "Chuck Noll, 4 Rings"SHALOT::MEDVIDKooler than JesusFri Dec 27 1991 12:2916
    OK, first things first: Chuck spells his last name N-O-L-L.  There is
    no K as Glanville would have liked everyone to believe a few years ago.
    
    Noll is definitely not suited for any kind of announcing or analyst
    position.  He's a quiet man with a quick temper.  And can you imagine
    him at CBS with Bradshaw?  Hooboy.
    
    My greatest worry is that some team will talk Noll out of retirement in
    a few years and he'll take the job.  What a terrible sight it would be
    to see Noll somewhere else.  Successful or not, it would almost be a
    feeling of betrayal.  Kind of hard to understand except I have felt it
    before when Franco put on a Seattle uniform and Mike Webster put on a
    KC uniform.  And I'm getting prepared to feel it this spring when I see
    Bonilla in a Mets uniform.
    
    	--nufrie ;-)
35.445No one in Pittsburgh can be happy about this...GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Dec 27 1991 12:4312
    
    Also, Joe spells his name G-R-E-E-N-E.  That last E gives him a
    little distinctiveness.
                 
    Noll's departure was indeed a sad event, but I guess everyone's got 
    to go sooner or later.  Like dan'l said, though, there's really no
    good way to do it and there's no way that Dan Rooney would do
    to Noll what Jerry Jones did to Tom Landry.  The next coach will
    have a huge shadow hovering over him...
    
    glenn
    
35.446Give head job to Walton!COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterFri Dec 27 1991 13:158
      Good luck Chuck!  I never cared for your Sqeelers,  but you did have
    strong teams during the 70's.
    
      I think Greene would be a flop.  I also think that whomever does take
    this job will end up having the same bad seasons as Chuck has these
    past few.
    
    	Tim
35.447AXIS::ROBICHAUDAristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.SmithFri Dec 27 1991 16:022
    	Heard on SportsCenter lasted night...
    	"First the Iron Curtain, now the Steel Curtain..."
35.448CAMONE::WAYTesticles,JennyTailya,D.SmithFri Dec 27 1991 16:238
>   <<< Note 35.447 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Aristotle,Socrates,Euclid,D.Smith" >>>
>
>    	Heard on SportsCenter lasted night...
>    	"First the Iron Curtain, now the Steel Curtain..."

That's a great one, Slasher....


35.449SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Fri Dec 27 1991 16:2332
    
    
    	I'm sad to see Noll go, but then again, maybe it was time for a
    change.  Nothing wrong with change either.
    
    	Noll gave the Steeler organization 23 great years.  Yea, there
    were some bad and some terrible years, but those 10 good years have
    a way of erasing all the negative stuff.
    
    	Noll was stubborn and an S.O.B., but maybe that's what it takes to
    be effective.  He never let the players boss him around and he always
    let them know who was in charge whether they liked it or not.  He
    really didn't have any favorites...everyone was treated the same.
    
    	Chuck wasn't perfect, but he was an excellent teacher of basic
    fundamental football, and told it like it was.  He's not and never
    was a media darling, but that's just the way he wanted it I'm sure,
    and it's probably the way most Pittsburgher's wanted it.  
    
    	Although building what has been called the greatest team in the
    history of the NFL and along the way winning 4 Super Bowls, the one
    award that has escaped him has been Coach of the Year.  Somewhere in
    those 23 years, this coach certainly deserved that honor, but I guess
    that's the way he wanted it and I guess most Pittsburgher's feel the
    same way.
    
    	Here's hoping that Chuck stays retired and enjoys his trip to
    Canton in 5 years.
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.450Noll did win COY in a year he really deserved itSHALOT::MEDVIDKooler than JesusFri Dec 27 1991 16:4814
    Actually, Noll did win COY in '89.  It was the year the team got
    outscored in its first two games something like 92-13.  They won their
    last five games, made the playoffs as a wild card, beat the Oilers in
    Houston on Gary Anderson's memorable 52-yard field goal in OT, and
    played their hearts out in Denver (especially Merrill Hoge) before
    losing the game in the last five minutes.  
    
    Everyone expected the Steelers to ride that success to the AFC Central
    title the next season, but the team went backward instead of forward. 
    You really have to believe a lot of this was due to Joe Walton.  Gotta
    wonder what would have happened had Noll gone with a different
    offensive coordinator.
    
    	--nufrie
35.451Black and Gold are great colorsPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonFri Dec 27 1991 20:0218
  Before Noll, the Steeler's were the doormat of the NFL for 35 years.
  He took the most pitiful team in the NFL and turned it into maybe the
  best NFL team ever. Last night on ESPN they showed an interesting stat.
  The 49'ers who have won 4 superbowls have 9 players with 4 superbowl
  rings while the Steeler's have 21 players with 4 superbowl rings. While
  the 49'ers saw a number of changes in there Superbowl victories, the 
  Steeler's were basically the same team in all 4 Superbowls. Thanks for
  all the memories Chuck, you did a great job.

  In regards to Joe Greene, I can remember his rookie year in 1968 when the
  team went 1-13. The team was terrible but in every home game, there was
  at least one standing ovation for "Mean Joe". You could tell that he was
  bringing some kind of winning spirit to a team that never had any. If as
  head coach he can capture that magic again and motivate the players as he 
  did as a player, he'll be a success. If the Rooney's want Mean Joe, I'm
  all for it.

					Keith
35.452SHALOT::MEDVIDKooler than JesusSat Dec 28 1991 16:296
>    Also, Joe spells his name G-R-E-E-N-E.  That last E gives him a
>    little distinctiveness.
    
    Hey, how was I supposed to know...he never gave ME his smelly jersey!
    
    
35.453CAMONE::WAYWake up Mamma, turn your lamp down lowMon Dec 30 1991 09:231
I thought that was a GREAT commercial 8^)
35.454Interesting statsCTHQ1::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeMon Dec 30 1991 11:449
    Keith,
    Interesting stats on SF vs. Pitt on SB rings.
    
    Not to put down Noll as the 70's Steelers were my all-time fav,
    but cain you infer that SF had the superior coaching and drafting
    prowess by simply looking at these stats? I cain.
    
    MikeL
     
35.455Pointless...both teams were greatSHALOT::MEDVIDKooler than JesusMon Dec 30 1991 12:0814
>    but cain you infer that SF had the superior coaching and drafting
>    prowess by simply looking at these stats? I cain.

    Arguments can be made in both directions so it's kind of pointless. 
    Noll drafted and developed a team that won four super bowls in six
    years.  That may never be done again.  A combination of low draft picks
    and almost all his coaching staff from those teams moving on to bigger
    positions really hurt the Steelers in the 80's.

    When those low picks didn't pan out and the Gabe Rivera tragedy
    occurred, the Steelers never did attain their goal of "one for the
    thumb."

    	--dan'l
35.456Probably comes down to years of contention vs. titlesGUSHER::WAUGAMANMon Dec 30 1991 12:1616
    
>    Not to put down Noll as the 70's Steelers were my all-time fav,
>    but cain you infer that SF had the superior coaching and drafting
>    prowess by simply looking at these stats? I cain.
     
    Depends on how you look at it, Mike.  Pittsburgh obviously had the
    better concentration of draft talent.  Stuff like two Hall of Famers
    in the same draft (Lambert and Swann), and maybe the best collection
    of talent of all time assembled in the span of 5-7 years.  So which
    is "better", beating the so-called draft crapshoot in a big way
    all at once or doing maybe not quite as well in the short term but
    spreading it out?  Either way, it's four rings (although San Francisco
    may not be done in the Montana era...)
    
    glenn
    
35.457Both at nadirCTHQ1::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeMon Dec 30 1991 12:229
    True dan'l,
    Both teams were great. As you pointed out many factors affect
    continued success. At first glance, my initial reaction was to be
    more impressed with SF; however when you are looking at the higher
    plateau both teams reached, it seems pointless. And it is. I'm looking
    for no argument, just a little more wowed by SF. I remain.
    
    MikeL
    
35.458CAMONE::WAYWake up Mamma, turn your lamp down lowMon Dec 30 1991 12:2411
>                               -< Both at nadir >-
                                           ^^^^^


Zenith.  Nadir is the opposite low point....  (unless of course you're
referring to their CURRENT sitauation 8^))


'Saw
    

35.459who said this conf wasn't educationalCTHQ1::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeMon Dec 30 1991 12:359
    I stand corrected, SIR. 
    Wow, first Apostrophe Police, now Correct Word Selection Militia.
    
    I have been schooled. Danke.
    
    MikeL
    
    P.S.  Good points Glenn
    
35.460Noll>>>Walsh MOPB...CNTROL::CHILDSBang!Bang! Let the Music go Bang!Mon Dec 30 1991 12:4114
 Niners also had the advantage of plan B for two of their victories and an
 owner who wasn't tight with his money and bought and traded for any player
 Billy W. wanted.

 Also Steelers won 4 in 7 years, Niners 4 in 9 years. Also have to feel the
 talent base has been more widely distributed during the Niners years. So
 while an argument can be made that they had less of an edge, it can also
 be argued for the Steelers that they had to beat another "great" team every
 year (ie Raiders) to advance...    


 mike

35.461PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonMon Dec 30 1991 13:3528
  A few replies back someone said the Steeler's had 2 Hall of Famer's in
  one years draft. Actually, it's one Hall of Famer but with a slim possibility
  that it may become 4 Hall of Famer's. The year was 1974. Lynn Swan was the 
  #1 pick. Jack Lambert was the #2, Mike Webster was #3 and John Stallworth
  was the #4 pick. Lambert is all ready in the HOF, Webster is probably a 
  shoe in for the HOF, Swann has a good shot at making the HOF and Stallworth
  has an outside shot of making the HOF. With out a doubt, the Steeler's 1974
  draft was the best in the history of Pro Football.

  If I remember correctly, I believe the Steeler's #1 draft's were:
	1968: Joe Greene
	1969: Terry Bradshaw
	1970: Mel Blount
	1971: Franco Harris
	1972: Can't remember
	1973: Can't Remember
	1974: Lynn Swan plus Lambert, Webster and Stallworth in the later 
	      rounds .

  Does anyone remember when Jack Ham was drafted and in what round ?

  > Also Steelers won 4 in 7 years, Niners 4 in 9 years. 

  Minor nit but the Steeler's won it all in 74,75,78,79. That makes 4 SB wins
  in 6 years. Allthough many people believe the 1976 Steeler's team was
  the best team they ever had. 

			Keith
35.462LAGUNA::MAY_BRNeed one of those endolphin rushesMon Dec 30 1991 13:382
    Are you sure Swann and Stallworth were drafted the same year?  I
    thought Swann came out a year or two before Stallworth.
35.463'74 no doubt the best draft ever by anyone!SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Dec 30 1991 14:0023
    
    re: Drafts..
    
    	O.K. here's what I've been able to come up with from my Steeler's
    of the Decade program..sorry, I used to have a Steeler Press Guide,
    but it's not here at work.
    
    	1969: Greene, Jon Kolb (3rd round), LC Greenwood (9th round)
    	1970: Bradshaw (1), Mel Blount (3rd round), 
    	1971: Ham (second round), Larry Brown (8th)
    	1972: Franco (1st),  Steve Furness (5th)
    	1973: J.T. Thomas (1st)
    	1974: Swann (1st), Lambert (2nd), Stallworth (4th), Webster (5th)
    	      Note: Randy Grossman and Donnie Shell signed as free agents.
    
    	Don't know where guys like Ron Shanklin, Dwight White, Ernie Holmes
    Mike Wagner and Glen Edwards fit in, but these guys also played major
    roles, not in all 4 SB's, but for the most part in the early to mid-
    70's...Oh, I did leave out the 'Rock'..Rocky Blier!
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.464More draft infoCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Dec 30 1991 18:0726
>>    	1969: Greene, Jon Kolb (3rd round), LC Greenwood (9th round)
>>    	1970: Bradshaw (1), Mel Blount (3rd round), 
>>    	1971: Ham (second round), Larry Brown (8th)
>>    	1972: Franco (1st),  Steve Furness (5th)
>>    	1973: J.T. Thomas (1st)
>>    	1974: Swann (1st), Lambert (2nd), Stallworth (4th), Webster (5th)
    	      Note: Randy Grossman and Donnie Shell signed as free agents.
    
>>    	Don't know where guys like Ron Shanklin, Dwight White, Ernie Holmes
>>    Mike Wagner and Glen Edwards fit in, but these guys also played major
>>    roles, not in all 4 SB's, but for the most part in the early to mid-
>>    70's...Oh, I did leave out the 'Rock'..Rocky Blier!

	1968: Rocky Blier(16th)
	1969: Terry Hanratty(2nd)
	1970: Ron Shanklin(2nd)
	1971: Dwight White(4a), Gerry Mullins(4), Ernie Holmes(8b)
	      Mike Wagner(11)
	1972: Joe Gilliam(11)
	1973: Loren Toews(8b)

This is all the additional information that I guide find from the Steelers
1990 media guide.  I couldn't find anything on Glen Edwards though.
	     
    
Roy L.     		    
35.465Edwards free agent 1971CELTIK::R_QUINNMon Dec 30 1991 18:115
    
    Glen Edwards is listed as playing for the Steelers frm 1971-1977 so he 
    had to be a free agent pickup out of Florida A&M.
    
    Roy L. 
35.466worse than Jack TatumSHALOT::MEDVIDKooler than JesusMon Dec 30 1991 18:125
    Wow, I didn't realize Mike Wagner was an 11th round pick.  He was one
    of the best defensive players ever and oh what a hard hitter...and a
    dirty player too.  Receivers absolutely feared him.

    	--dan'l
35.467CAMONE::WAYWake up Mamma, turn your lamp down lowTue Dec 31 1991 09:216
Blier was drafted in 68, but he didn't start playing until 1970, right?
Because of being in 'Nam and having his foot wounded and all....

Just trying to get some years straight....

'Saw
35.468They're still a fog!HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesTue Dec 31 1991 10:152
       I'm still trying to get those particular years straight myself 'Saw.
                                             Denny
35.469CAMONE::WAYWake up Mamma, turn your lamp down lowTue Dec 31 1991 10:229
>       I'm still trying to get those particular years straight myself 'Saw.

hahahahahahahaha....

Yeah, but I was like 12 then, Denny.  That's not to say that I wasn't
a little wild, but...


'Saw
35.470All You OLDDDD People...No wonder you cant get the yearsRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 31 1991 11:472
    1970...Hmmmm... I was lets see... 3
    						M_air_Brooks
35.471MCIS1::DHAMELSleeping with the LambsTue Dec 31 1991 15:288
    
    >    1970...Hmmmm... I was lets see... 3
    						M_air_Brooks
    
    Air, you don't even shave yet! 8^)
    
    Dickstah
    
35.47224 years old and counting....RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSTue Dec 31 1991 16:238
    Hey Dickstah Dont you owe me something, you said you were going
    to say something nice after you collected :-)
    
    And believe me the worst day of my life was when I had to shave
    the first time, I hate it...... Luckily I dont have to do it very
    often :-)  (hair dont run in my family but neither does Baldness)
    
    							M_Air_Brooks
35.473Finally got this modem thing working.PTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementTue Dec 31 1991 18:1425
    
  >>shoe in for the HOF, Swann has a good shot at making the HOF and Stallworth
  >>has an outside shot of making the HOF. With out a doubt, the Steeler's 1974
    
    Actually, I think Stallworth has a better chance of getting into the
    HOF than Swann does.  Swann has already been passed over a few times. 
    He had good stats for the years he played, plus some GREAT circus
    catches, but he didn't have longevity.  He quit after doctors told him
    another concussion could render him either daid or a candidate for a
    Veg-A-Matic.
    
    Stallworth played something like 12 years, and missed very little time
    to injury.  He is the Steelers leading receiver in many categories, but
    may be passed by Louis Lipps if Lipps stays around long enuf.
    
    BTW, the top 3, according to 2 TV stations here in Pittsburgh, in the
    Steelers coaching search are Dave Wannstadt(sp?), defensive
    co-ordinator for Dallas, ???? Holmgren, Offensive co-ordinator in San
    Fran, and the defensive co-ordinator for the New York Jets, whose name
    escapes me at this moment.  I hope they don't pick the guy from the
    Jets, cause everybody knows about the lasted coach they got from the
    Jets!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.474CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementTue Jan 07 1992 17:5719
    The Steelers have scheduled an interview with Rod Rust(no, please,
    don't hire him, PULEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE DON'T)
    They also plan to interview, or have already interviewed the following:
    
    Current running back coach, Dick Hoak, defensive line coach Joe Greene,
    secondary coach John Fox
    
    Greg Landry
    Dave Wannstedt
    Bill Cowher
    Mike Holmgren
    Stanford coach Dennis Green
    San Antonio Riders(WLAF) coach Mike Riley
    
    There are others whose names excape me as of this writing, who either
    were interviewed, or will be soon.
    
    JaKe
    
35.475you definitely don't want RustJARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Jan 07 1992 18:0010
    re .474:
    
    > The Steelers have scheduled an interview with Rod Rust(no, please,
    > don't hire him, PULEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE DON'T)
    
    As one who saw Rust's "work" all too close-up here in New England last
    year, I read you loud and clear.
    
    
    py
35.476DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Tue Jan 07 1992 18:083
    Jake, I predict that Dave Wannstedt will wind up with the Steeler job.
    
    WILDCAT
35.477FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jan 07 1992 18:115
    As I understand it, Rod Rust isn't being interviewed for the job of head
    coach, but rather, the job of defensive coordinator at both Pittsburgh
    and San Diego.  He's a great defensive coordinator.
    
    John
35.478PTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementTue Jan 07 1992 18:1720
    
    >>Jake, I predict that Dave Wannstedt will wind up with the Steeler job.
    
    >>WILDCAT
    
    I don't klnow what it is, but something keeps telling me that this is
    true.  I have had that feeling ever since his name popped into the
    bucket full of candidates for the job, which was the day Noll retired.
    
    Re Ninj
    I wouldn't mind seeing Rust come back to Pittsburgh as defensive
    co-ordinator.  He built the Steeler defense that finished #1 lasted
    year, even though eh was in N.E. by then.  David Brazille did nothing
    to change Rust's defense, but then decided to try and fine tune it this
    year and they finished considerably lower.  Rust would be a good choice
    for the defensive job here.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.479QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSTue Jan 07 1992 21:166
    JaKe...
    
     I Predict the Squeelers will be at the bottom of the weakest division
    in football once again nexted(tm) season...  Wanna bet ???
    
    BG
35.480CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementWed Jan 08 1992 01:2612
    
    >> I Predict the Squeelers will be at the bottom of the weakest division
    >>in football once again nexted(tm) season...  Wanna bet ???
    
    1st of all they finished in 2nd place in the AFC Central this year, not
    lasted.
    
    Secondly, if they'll be at the bottom of the weakest division in
    football, they'll have to change divisions to the AFC West.
    
    JaKe
    
35.481;^)QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 12:4610
    
     Not !!!!
    
     I beleive that the AFC West had 3, count `em, 3 teams in the playoffs
    this season.  I can see how you could make a case for it being the
    weakest division from stats like that.  And to top it off,  The AFC
    West has a team in the Championship game...  When was the lasted(tm)
    time the Central did...
    
     BG
35.482Entire AFC is weak, nothing to proud of at allSHALOT::MEDVIDpaint me in leatherWed Jan 08 1992 13:069
    Cleveland, 1989, lost to Denver who had barely gotten by Pittsburgh the
    week before.
    
    But what JaKe was pointing out, Big Pain, was that you said Pittsbugh
    would finish at the bottom of the AFC central AGAIN.  When, please
    tell, was the last time that happened?
    
    	--dan'l
    
35.483I kinda like "Big Pain" I was rollward !!QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 13:5412
    Not sure dan'l... 
    
    The bottom line is that the Squeelers are weak.  Their division is the
    weakest in the AFC if not the Entire NFL  (NFC Central a tie or close
    2nd) So...  My Point was (and it was in fun) that it really doesn't
    matter who coaches the Squeelers this year or nexted(tm).  They have
    much rebuilding to do and it will take some time (1 to 2 years) to get
    them out of the cellar
    
    HTH
    
    BG
35.484BP, you must have a funny looking houseSHALOT::MEDVIDpaint me in leatherWed Jan 08 1992 16:0811
>    much rebuilding to do and it will take some time (1 to 2 years) to get
>    them out of the cellar
    
    Big Pain, the Steelers are/were not in the cellar!!!!!  They finished
    second in their division and there are about nine or ten teams picking
    in front of them in next year's draft.
    
    I'm not certain, but I would guess that the Steelers have not finished
    at the bottom of the AFC Central since 1969.  
    
    	--dan'l
35.485FSOA::JRODOPOULOSIntl. Business SupportWed Jan 08 1992 18:448
    If Wandstedt (sp) get the job it will be a big loss to the Dallas
    Cowboys.  He did an excellent job the last two years with minimal
    talent.
    
    But then again as Dallas fans it sure feels great knowing that others
    within the NFL appreciate our coaching staff.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
35.486JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Jan 08 1992 19:435
    I've read/heard a couple reports stating that Mean Joe Greene is the
    leading candidate for the head coaching job...any truth to these?
    
    
    py
35.487QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 19:5010
    Heard the Same...  I think it would be a step in the right direction
    for the Squeelers.  Look what Shell did for the Faiders.  With a half
    assed QB they surely would have beaten out the Donks for the AFC West.
    Also,  With the overwhelming Population of Blacks in the NFL it seems
    quite odd to me that we only have one Black head coach considering the 
    available talent in the assistant coaches ranks.  Joe Greene as done a
    great job for the Squeelers both as a player and a coach.  I say give
    the bum a shot at it.
    
    Big Game Hunta
35.488PTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementWed Jan 08 1992 19:5512
    The one drawback with Greene is his lack of experience.  He has been
    defensive line coach for the Steelers, but that has been his ONLY
    coaching job since retiring as a player.  Greene will be given an
    interview, and I sincerely hope he gets a head coaching job someday,
    but I think he needs some more experience, as a defensive co-ordinator,
    before he'll be ready to step in as a head coach.
    
    Would be something, though, eh, Mean Joe returns and builds another
    super bowl team.
    
    JaKe
    
35.489QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSWed Jan 08 1992 20:055
    Well,
    
     That may be taking it a bit far, Rake
    
    Big Game Hunta
35.490no room to talk...CNTROL::CHILDSIs it a question of Love? hahaaaaaThu Jan 09 1992 11:133
 small time Hunta,  I'S gottsta to no 'ow u cain sit thar & lambast Wrong Way
 when he's polished off those wimpy a$$ Donks 5 out of the last 6 games?
35.491QUASER::HUNTERBad_Boy of ::SPORTSThu Jan 09 1992 13:227
    
     I can Blam(tm) Wrong Way because he's always sitting at home when
    the Donks are in the Championship game.  Jay gets lucky and Beats
    the Donks (and it surely ain't all Jay either...) But he can't keep
    them in it till the end.  Wrong way is weak, weak, weak...
    
    BGH
35.492EARRTH::BROOKSThe People's NoTY 1991 : DrMThu Jan 09 1992 16:303
    Speaking of ex-Steeler assistants, what about Tony Dungy ? He was
    former D.C. of the Steelers, did a great job, and was considered to be
    the fav. to be the 1st black head coach. Then, I hear nothing.
35.493Is exper necessary//How much did Chuck Noll have?CELTIK::R_QUINNFri Jan 10 1992 18:0014
    RE: -1
    
    I saw Tony Dungy in the coaches booth for a team in the playoffs.  I
    think it was KC.  He did sort of fade out of the limelight.  His name
    hasn't even been mentioned lately.
    
    As a part of a SD feature early to mid season Mean Joe says that he
    isn't quite ready for head coaching.  He may feel that this year taught
    some valuable lessons.  How much experience did Art Shell have as a
    coach before getting the head job??  I wonder how much input Chuck gets
    if any at all.
    
    Roy L.
                  
35.494DungyCELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementMon Jan 13 1992 21:158
    Dungy fell out of favor around the NFL when his Steeler defense went
    south a few years ago when he was defensive coordinator for the
    Steelers.  The Steelers fired him and brought in Rod Rust to replace
    him.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.495CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementMon Jan 13 1992 21:2019
    The Steelers, once the interview Woody Widenhofer tomorrow, will have
    completed their list of candidates for the vacant head coaching job.
    
    It appears, short of adding Widenhofer to the list, that they have
    whittled their list down to 3 people, KC defensive coordinator Bill
    Cowher, Dallas Defensive coordinator Dave Wannstedt, and Steelers
    defensive line coach Joe Greene.  These were the only 3 who have been
    interviewed twice, and Tom Donahoe said today no other candidates are
    to be scheduled for a second interview, but the three mentioned above
    may be scheduled for third interviews shortly.
    
    Wannstedt met with the Steelers for an 8 hour interview Saturday, and
    is said to be the leading candidate for the job.
    
    Donahoe also said that an announcement naming the new head coach could
    come as early as the end of this week.
    
    JaKe
    
35.496Head coach of college intramural teams or what?SHALOT::MEDVIDnot one ounce or inch of controlTue Jan 14 1992 11:195
    The knock against Joe Greene is that he has no head coaching
    experience.  What are Cowher's and Wannstedt's experiences regarding
    this category?
    
    	--dan'l
35.497FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jan 14 1992 11:295
    None that I know of.  The real knock against Greene is that he's never
    been a coordinator which is the usual career path to becoming a head
    coach.
    
    John
35.498EARRTH::BROOKSCan you say 'triangulated crossfire'?Tue Jan 14 1992 18:341
    Yeah, Greene has been soley DL coach, no other experience.
35.499JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Jan 14 1992 18:446
    Wasn't Art Shell solely an OL coach before becoming the Raiders' head
    coach?  Haven't heard many complaints from Raider fans about Shell's
    coaching...
    
    
    py
35.500.500! :-)JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Jan 14 1992 18:441
    
35.501Which means he'll probably get the job...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jan 14 1992 19:248
    
    Is Greene really a candidate or his name there for appeasement
    purposes?  I find it hard to believe that Greene's a serious candidate
    after he himself stated that he wasn't sure if he was ready or if he
    really even wanted the job at this time...
    
    glenn
    
35.502CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementTue Jan 14 1992 19:3014
    glenn
    
    I think Greene is on the list for "sentimental" type reasons.  Ya know,
    HOF'er from the glory years, working for the team for the lasted few
    years.  Given 2 interviews as more a courtesy than anything else.
    
    Common consensus around Pittsburgh is that the Steelers, if they hired
    Greene, would have to surround him with the best of assistant coaches
    in every position to make this team go anywhere.  They'd end up like
    Hal's Brown(spot)s(tm) and have a zillion assistant coaches, and like
    Hal's 'Spots, go absolutely nowhere.
    
    JaKe
    
35.503QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Tue Jan 14 1992 19:495
    Kinda like this year,  Huh Fake !!
    
    ;^)
    
    Big Game Junta
35.504PTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementWed Jan 15 1992 18:1112
    Cowher interviewed for ~5 hours with the Steelers the other day. 
    Widenhofer is on the list to be interviewed SOON.  
    
    It's almost getting easier to list who HASN'T been interviewed for the
    vacant head coach position.
    
    Latest news here is still that Wannstedt is the leader and Cowher is
    right behind him.  Both are from the Pittsburgh area with close ties to
    the city.
    
    JaKe
    
35.505QUASER::HUNTERSteelers To The Super Bowl In `93Wed Jan 15 1992 21:246
    Hey FaKe...  Dose it really matter ??  A simple coaching change ain't
    gonna help your happless Squeelers... Give up on the Bums and come 
    over to a real team like thye Mighty Broncos of Denver Colorado. 
    Now thats manly team !!   ;^)
    
    BGJ
35.506CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementWed Jan 15 1992 22:515
    Ya know, Little 'n' Lame, that's one thing I like about you, you always
    make me laugh.  Sorta like a HaloftheBroncos.
    
    JaKe
    
35.507CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementFri Jan 17 1992 18:4211
    Head Coach position expected to be filled Monday or Tuesday.  Wannstedt
    is still the leading candidate.  The Steelers gave him a third
    interview yesterday.  he's the only of the interviewees to be talked to
    3 times, but Bill Cowher is expected to get 1 more interview, as is the
    Offensive Coordinator from the Oilers, whose name escapes me at this
    time.
    
    Got my money on Wannstedt
    
    JaKe
    
35.508CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementMon Jan 20 1992 18:468
    The Steelers will announce at a press conference at noon tomorrow that 
    the new Head Coach will be:
    
    
    Bill Cowher, Defensive Coordinator of the Kansas City Chiefs.
    
    JaKe
    
35.509CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementMon Jan 20 1992 19:287
    First rumor about Cowher is that he'll hire Lindy Infante as the
    Offensive Coordinator.
    
    Cowher will have full power over who is hired as assistant coaches.
    
    JaKe
    
35.510QUASER::HUNTERSteelers need a coach and 5 yrsMon Jan 20 1992 21:184
     after what Infante did at Greenbay I'd better change my p-name to 
    "Steelers still need coaches and 20 or 30 years"   Ha.... !!
    
    BG
35.511CELTIK::JACOBIntrospective...Make a StatementMon Jan 20 1992 23:4524
    Re Infante, new reports say that Infante said he has no interest in
    coaching again in the near future.  I wonder if it could be about the
    fact that the Packers have to pay him ~$1 million over the nexted two
    years, and he wants to just go golfing and collect his money??
    
    Ya know it's sort of funny, Cowher hasn't even OFFICIALLY been
    announced as head coach and the local media is soiling their pants over
    the guy already.  Tonite, a local radio station that is ALL-TALK and
    nothing but sports in the evening started having all of these people
    that had something to do with Cowher and football as he was growing up in 
    Pittsburgh.  They were getting people like assistant coaches from his
    intermediate school days, etc.  I almost expected them to get someone
    like the next door neighbor of Cowher's Pee-Wee football coach's
    brother-in-law's uncle and have the guy saying something like, "Ya
    know, we uset ta watch dis kid when he wuz 8 or 9 years old and I just
    told all of my buddies back then that in 25 years or so, dis kid would
    be da coach of da Stillers."  
    
    It's sort of ridiculous to interview all of these bozos and think that
    they remember every Tom Dick and Harry who comes through the schools
    and different programs as well as they project they do over the radio.
    
    JaKe
    
35.512CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Wed Jan 22 1992 23:1110
    Would the 2 people who sent me mail asking about info on getting the
    "Steeler's Digest" among other Steeler paraphenalia please send me
    another mail message.  I seem to have lost the other mail messages with
    your node addresses and names.
    
    
    Sorry
    
    JaKe
    
35.513Cowher ConfirmedCELTIK::R_QUINNThu Jan 23 1992 19:007
    
    It was confirmed via yesterdays paper that Cowher did get the job. 
    Second youngest in the league behind Shula at Cincinnatti.  Other than
    the information posted here I haven't heard much about though.
    
    Roy L.
    
35.514Minor notesCELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Fri Jan 24 1992 19:0411
    FWIW, Mike Shanahan is in Pgh. today interviewing for the job of
    Offensive Coordinator for the Steelers.
    
    George Stewart, special teams coach, has taken the same job at Tampa
    Bay under Wicky Wacky Wyche.
    
    Joe Walton has been given formal notice that he will not be retained as
    Offensive Coordinator for  the team.
    
    JaKe
    
35.515Ex-Steelers coaches popping up everywhereCELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Sat Jan 25 1992 01:529
    David Brazille, who WAS the Steelers defensive coordinator this past
    season has accepted the position of secondary coach for the NY Giants.
                      
    Tony Dungy, who held the defensive coordinator position for a few years
    for the Steelers, has been hired as defensive coordinator for the
    Minny-soda Vikings.
    
    JaKe
    
35.516More on Cowher pleezeSHALOT::MEDVIDtoo sexy for my carSun Jan 26 1992 14:2511
    JaKe (or others),
    
    how about some info on Cowher.  Age.  Experience.  Pittsburgh
    connection...I see from the Gene Collier article that he is from
    Crafton...did he play for Carlinton or perhaps Canevan?  Where did he
    play college ball?  You know, all the stuff that I've been missing on
    ESPN and up in the local media.
    
    Thanks.
    
    	--dan'l
35.517FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Sun Jan 26 1992 20:445
    Cowher played at NC State and then played for the Browns from 80-82. 
    He coached at Philly in 83-84, Cleveland 85-88, Kansas City 89-91.  No
    other info available.
    
    John
35.518CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Mon Jan 27 1992 19:026
    Cowher is 34 years old, and played for Carlynton High School.
    
    I'll see what else I cain dig up on him for ya, --dan'l.
    
    JaKe
    
35.519Cowher hires some coachesPTOVAX::JACOBIntrospective....Make A StatementMon Jan 27 1992 22:5910
    
    Ron Erhardt--Offensive Coordinator
    
    Dick Hoak--retained as running backs coach
    
    Steve Furness--Defensive line coach
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.520Profile on CowherCELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Tue Jan 28 1992 01:24199
--dan'l, you asked for it, here it is.
    
    
    
THE EYES HAVE IT!!

Cowher's enduring qualities can't be seen on his resume.

By Bill Utterbeck

from The Pittsburgh Press, 1-26-1992


	Steelers coach Bill Cowher was born in 1957, the peak year of the baby
boom, the year that produced Donnie Osmond, Melanie Griffith, Michelle
Pfieffer, Geena Davis and Vanna White.  A good year for beautiful women, but
perhaps, but a year that has not yet produced many dynamic quality males.
	Can you picture Donnie Osmond stalking the sideline as head coach,
jumping in Bubby Brister's face about a poor decision, questioning Greg Lloyd
about a personal foul??  Isn't 34 too young to step into a world ruled by
experienced coaches such as Marv Levy, Joe Gibbs, Don Shula, Jack Pardee, Mike
Ditka, and Chuck Knox?
	When Cowher was born, Knox was head coach at Elwood City high school
and Pardee was a rookie with the Los Angeles Rams.  When Cowher was learning to
walk, Levy was head coach at New Mexico State University.  When cowher was 3,
Shula began coaching in the NFL.  When Cowher was in first grade, Ditka earned
his first NFL championship ring with the Bears, and Gibbs was designing
offensive schemes with passmaster Don Coryell at San Diego State.
	how can a young guy compete against men who were inventing and
ingesting football before he was born??  While Cowher was attending college
parties, Dan Reeves worked as an offensive coordinator in consecutive Super
Bowls with the Dallas Cowboys.
	"Cowher was a crazy guy," said jim Richter, an offensive lineman of the
Buffalo Bills and a college teammate of Cowher's who will be playing in Super
Bowl XXVI today.  "he was one of the fun guys to be with.  The people he hung
out with, they'd break down doors, stay up late.  He was the typical college
football player.  It is hard to picture him as being the coach over the players
and having to discipline them and that kind of stuff.  It's hard to see it."
	Cowher is the youngest head coach of the Steelers since John Michelson,
33, was hired in 1948.  (The Steelers had several coaches age 35 or younger in
the early days, including John "Blood" McNally).  Cowher's resume says he
played with the Cleveland Browns and Philadelphia Eagles, and coached with the
Browns and the Kansas City Chiefs.  He has worked for 12 seasons in the NFL.
	People who know Cowher suggest his best assets cannot be revealed in a
resume.  They believe he has many qualities that can make him competitive with
any of the NFL's coaches, regardless of their experience.
	
Look into his eyes
------------------

	Passion.
	"I remember the first day I met Bill," said Lou James, a boyhood friend
and high school teammate of Cowher's.  "We were 8 or 9 years old and we got
into a fight in the alley behind his house.  I whipped him that day and then I
hid from him.  I can still see the look in his eyes.  It was scary.  he hates
to lose.  he gets so intense and you can see the intensity in his eyes.  They
say Mike Singletary has the most imposing eyes in football, but they can't be
any more imposing than Cowher's.
	Those eyes also made impressions in high school.  "You would look at
him in the huddle and he'd be so intense, so emotional, that there would
actually be tears in his eyes," said Bill Ellsworth, also a Carlynton High
School teammate.
	Cowher's college teammates at North carolina State saw more than tears. 
"We laughed when we said it, but we thought he was borderline insane when it
came to football," said Brad Holt, a college teammate who played at Beaver high
School.  "there was something about his eyes.  You could see the fire in them. 
If you looked into his eyes as he walked onto the football field, it was like
he was leaving the planet.  He was the most intense player I'd ever seen."
	The eyes, the passion, the intensity did not diminish when cowher began
his coaching career with the Cleveland browns.
	"We had a nickname for him in Cleveland," said former Browns safety,
Ray Ellis, who was a teammate of Cowher's with the Philadelphia Eagles.  "We
called him 'The Face'. Frank Minnifield named him.  It had to do with the
intensity we saw in his face.  During the game, you would look over at him and
he looked like a big, old, mean grizzly, stalking and prowling.
	
Labors of love
--------------

	Cowher's passion was fueled by preparation and knowledge.  He has only
been on the planet for 34 years, but he has been taking notes most of the time.
	"Even as a boy, Bill was a student of the game," said Ed Hamer, one of
Cowher's youth league coaches with the Little Cougars in Crafton.  "he was all
ears if you were talking about football.  He soaked up everything like a dry
sponge and he never forgot anything you told him."
	At Carlynton high school, Cowher often stayed after practice to watch
game films with defensive coordinator Bill Yost.  He went to yost during study
halls to watch films or talk about defensive schemes.  "he was always asking
questions.  He always wanted to know more about what we were doing adn why we
were doing it," said Yost.
	At North Carolina, he continued his film study.  "The offensive
linemen's meeting began an hour and a half before anybody else on the team, but
whenever we got there, we'd find Bill, sitting in the dark with the projector,
running game film back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, looking for
some little edge, some little insight that was going to help him during the
game," said Holt.
	"Bill couldn't rlax, couldn't think about anything else, until he was
sure he knew everything he needed to know for the next game," said Russ Matt,
Cowher's north carolina teammate and rommate from Jeannette.
	As a player and coach in the NFL, Cowher continued to rely heavily on
preparation.
	"Bill always paid tremendous attention to detail.  He worked very, very
hard at preparing himself mentally.  his determination to gain every edge
possible was extraordinary," said Frank Gansz, who was special teams coach with
the Eagles when Cowher played.
	Kaye Cowher, who met her husband in college and married him in 1983,
said Cowher's typical workday with the KC Chiefs ended at 10 pm Monday, 3 am
Tuesday, 1 am Wednesday, 11 pm Thursday, and 7 pm Friday.  Sundays, he would
sometimes look at the game films after the game.
	"he's the type of person who has to be sure he's done everything
possible," said Kaye Cowher.

Leader of the packs
-------------------

	Preparation and passion made Cowher a leader as a player.
	he was elected captain and most valuable player by his teammates in
college.  he was elected special teams captain after one season with the Browns
and voted special teams MVP after one season with the Eagles.
	"Bill was probably as well respected by his peers as any player I've
been around," said Marty Schottenheimer, head coach of the Chiefs.
	his influence was first felt on Hawthorne Street in Crafton. he talked
his friends into lifting weights with him.  He talked them into going to
football camp at IUP(Indiana University of Pennsylvania) with him.  cowher went
on to an NFL career and three of his buddies from the neighborhood--Lou James,
Jim James, and Tom Hennessey--went on to play for national championship teams
at Westminster College.
	"Bill was the leader from the beginning and everybody else followed,"
said Lou James.
	"On the field, Bill did every thing he could to make sure the rest of
us knew what we were doing.  he wanted everybody involved in every play, even
if he had to pick you up by the seat of your pants and throw you at the
quarterback," said Ellsworth.
	"He never said much when the coaches were around, but when we got on
the field, he did all the talking and everybody listened to him," said Jim
James.  "I remember we didn't have a goal-line defense, we'd never practiced
it, so he made one up in the huddle at Peters Township.  He just said, 'You get
down, You get Down, You get down.' he positioned all of us, and it worked."
	At North carolina State, Cowher was a three-year starter and twice led
the team in tackles.  The defense was driven by the inside linebackers: Cowher
and Kyle Wescoe.  they were called butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, and
Starsky and Hutch.  They took turns calling plays and making plays, but Cowher
took control in the toughest times.
	"Bill always knew the right thing to say and the right time to say it,"
said Wescoe.  "When things were going good, he wouldn't say much.  But when
things got tough, he could motivate his fellow teammates very easily.  He was a
great motivational-type person."

The flip side
-------------

	Passionate.  Driven.  Possessed.  Intense.  Focused.  Those adjectives
are used again and again when friends and acquaintances begin talking about
Cowher.  The initial image is of a man consumed by the game.  But that isn't
accurate.
	Neighbors refer to him as gentle and kind and polite, a guy who could
sit on the front porch and talk about anything but football.  Teammates say he
was demanding and driven on the field, but considerate and relaxed away from
it.
	"He was a good-hearted person.   he would do anything for you.  he was
very easy-going.  he liked to get away from the game sometimes," said Matt.
	"We loved to shoot pool or go to places where the regular crowd
gathered," Wescoe said.  "We liked fitting in with people who weren't so
concerned with people."
	Kaye Cowher played on North Carolina State's nationally ranked women's
basketball team.  She was attracted to Cowher because he wasn't like many of
the other athletes she had met on campus.
	"I knew he was a big football player on campus, but he was different. 
He was sweet and gentle and very nice."
	Through the years, although the demands of football have intensified,
Cowher has maintained the separation between football and family.
	"You should see him with our little girls.  He's so gentle.  If he wins
a big game, or loses a big game, our girls would never know it from him.  When
he comes through the door, he doesn't bring football with him."
	The Cowhers have three daughters: Megan,5; Lauren, 4; Lindsay, 1.
	"Megan played soccer this year and Bill made it to a lot of her games. 
Every thought he would have to be down on the sidelines coaching, but he sat
and watched and smiled."
	The years and the family may have mellowed Cowher.  he's not the wild
man that Richter remembers from college.  He doesn't sprint down the sideline
as he did as a special teams coach with the Browns.  But he's still the same
person, with the same qualities, he was at Carlynton and North Carolina State
and Cleveland and Philadelphia.  his passion and his preparation and his
leadership ability are as potent as ever.
	"My belief is that things have to be thoroughly done," he said.  "I be
lieve the best chance you have for success is that every one have a true
understanding of what's expected of them.  If that means spending time at 2
a.m., we will do it....It is not just talent that can get you someplace.  If
you make a commitment, and you believe in it, you can obtain anything."
	The philosophy is the same.  And "The Face" is the same.
	"I watched him on the sideline during playoff games and he has calmed
down a little," said Holt.  "But did you see his eyes?  You can still see the
fire in them."




JaKe

35.521CNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationTue Jan 28 1992 12:072
If Furness is the DL coach, where does this leave Joe Greene?
35.522Unemployed, no doubtFSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jan 28 1992 12:421
    
35.523Jake, You Like The P-Name ??QUASER::HUNTERJaKe... The Best GD Noter Ever !!Tue Jan 28 1992 21:064
    
     Yet another Bum to carry on the Losing tradition...  ;^)
    
    BG
35.524CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Wed Jan 29 1992 00:054
    At least you pay up on wagers!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.525CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Wed Jan 29 1992 01:1925
    
>>If Furness is the DL coach, where does this leave Joe Greene?
    
    Greene will be gone from the Steelers.  He will probably catch on
    somewhere else.  He has been the Steelers DL coach for the lasted five
    years.  
    
    On the radio here in Pgh, there are a  lot of people calling in and
    crying that Greene got porked in the whole matter.  Personally, I'm sad
    to see him go, BUT, the Steelers have given Cowher full say in who his
    assistants are, AND, he cain't be expected to keep Greene on for
    strictly sentimental reasons.
    
    Wicky Wacky Wyche has said that he may have a job for Greene in Tampa.
    
    I figure Mean Joe to land a head coaching job in 3-5 years, who knows,
    maybe in Pittsburgh, even.  He will have more experience than just
    having been a Defensive line coach. 
    
    I could possibly see Cowher hiring Greene as Defensive Coordinator,
    seeing as since Cowher himself was a DC, he will probably oversee the
    defense on the Steelers more than the offense.
    
    JaKe
    
35.526COMET::JACKSONTAThe 9 hitterWed Jan 29 1992 14:544
      Mean Joe back in pitt in 3-5 years as head coach?  Given up on
    Cohwer already JaKe?
    
    	Tim
35.527fyiLUNER::BROOKSDickButkus,BobGriese,BobKnight?Wed Jan 29 1992 15:072
    BTW, Dennis Green is aking Tony Dungy if he wants the DC job in
    Minnesota ....
35.528USCTR2::NAHEARNWed Jan 29 1992 19:367
    I was under the impression that Dungy (sp?) had already accepted the
    position!!   
    
    No?
    
    
    Nelly
35.529CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Wed Jan 29 1992 21:0211
    
    >>  Mean Joe back in pitt in 3-5 years as head coach?  Given up on
    >>Cohwer already JaKe?
    
    Nah, just when he proves to be EXTREMELY sucessful NBC will offer him
    Beau Coup bucks to jump to the booth, leaving Greene his opening.
    
    Cowher BTW has a 4 year contract.
    
    JaKe
    
35.530CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Thu Jan 30 1992 18:488
    The Steelers announced today that Bill Cowher has hired Dom Kapers as
    defensive coordinator.  Kapers was with New Orleans for the lasted 6
    years as secondary coach.
    
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.531CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Fri Jan 31 1992 00:325
    make that "Capers", not Kapers.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.532CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Fri Jan 31 1992 01:257
    Heard also that the Steelers are going to hire Marvin Lewis as their
    special teams coach.  Lewis has been outside linebackers coach at the
    University of Pittsburgh recently, and worked with Cowher when he
    coached at Pitt.
    
    JaKe
    
35.533questions questions questionsCELTIK::R_QUINNFri Jan 31 1992 19:3212
    
    I know the season is a long way off but there is a certain amount of
    eeriness concerning the teams future.  This team appeared to be
    somewhat talented but mired in an offensive system that was awkward and
    complicated which also lead to the defense spending long stints on the
    field which caused tiredness and giving up points.  To see a totally
    new staff without major experience(except O coor.) you have to wonder
    what types of D and O to look for next year and will it take time such
    as in a Dallas scenario(1-15) for the coaching to catch up.
    
    Roy L. Quinn
    
35.534New staff will help more than it hurtsSHALOT::MEDVIDtoo sexy for my carFri Jan 31 1992 19:5632
    Roy,

    bottom line is that the Steelers were a bad "team" in the true sense of
    the word.  They managed to finish second in the division, but not
    because of fantastic play; instead, Cleveland got real caught up in
    thinking they could make the playoffs and instead ended up behind the
    Steelers after the final week.  Steelers beat them, sure, but it was
    more a Browns fold than a Pittsburgh rejuvenation.

    What I'm saying here is that there is talent on this team that was not
    utilized to its potential, especially on offense.  And as good a coach
    as Noll was, he still couldn't bring it out.  The hope is that the new
    staff will tap the potential and create a team in the true sense of the
    word.

    I'm not filled with much optimism, unlike some other Brown-stained fan
    is every year.  I think the most telling point was made in a Gene
    Collier article that JaKe posted a few months back.  In it, it was
    stated that Chuck Noll became a 9-5 coach; in his glory years, Noll
    slept in his office during the football season.  If that's an
    ingredient to success (and I'm not sure it is) then everything you read
    about Kowher points to a winning season.

    If not, the team is no worse off than before.

    Houston will still win the AFC Central next year (barring Moon getting
    hurt).  Pittsburgh and Cleveland will be dogging it out for second
    place honors.  Cinci has made the biggest mistake of any coach-seeking
    franchise in the hiring of young Shula and will be in the cellar once
    again.

    	--dan'l
35.535CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Fri Jan 31 1992 21:39134
    As far as the team goes, here's how I see the talent:
    
    QB--Brister- not a great QB but he's also not absolutely horrible,
    		either.  Doubt his ability to win the "Big One" if he ever
    		was to get there.
    	O'Donnell--Jury still out.  Showed glimmers of being the Steelers
    		saviour lasted year, but also made some dumb mistakes. 
    		Bottom line on Neil is he lacks experience, but I think he 
    		will be a good QB once he gets more playing time under his
    		belt.
    
    Running Backs-With Worley and Foster, if both stay healthy(and keep
    		their noses clean, if'n ya know what I mean), the Steelers
    		have the potential to have a top-notch backfield.  Add to
    		this Merrill Hoge and (guy from Penn State whose name
    		escapes me at this moment) + Warren Williams and the
    		Steelers are not hurting at running back, which will be
    		important nest season because both Cowher and Erhardt have
    		said they want to implement a power running game, with some
    		passing.  The Steelers main focus will be the running game,
    		though.
    
    Offensive Line--Truly offensive.  The Steelers' offensive line lasted
    		year was pretty dismal.  Tunch Ilkin has lost a step(if he
    		had it in the first place) and may have only a year or two
    		to go, and those will probably see him playing sparingly at
    		best because of increased problems with nagging injuries.
    		Rest of the line is poor to lousy.  Tom Ricketts turns out
    		to be a bust.  Carlton Haselrig shows brilliance, then
    		looks like sh_t for awhile.  
    
    Tight Ends--Strongest part of team.  Eric Green, if he returns at 100%
    		after breaking his anklelasted year, will be one of the
    		best tight ends in the league.  Keith Cash and Adrian
    		Cooper filled in admirably.  Mike Mularkey will(or already
    		has) retire, and would like to sign on with the Steelers in
    		a coaching capacity.  We'll see on him.
    
    Recievers--Another weak spot.  Louis Lipps is on the downward side of
    		his career, and never has shown the brilliance he had
    		before the 2 years of hamstring problems.  Rookies Jeff
    		Graham and Ernie Mills were VERY UN-IMPRESSIVE in the 
    		games in which they played.  Graham looked like a waste of
    		money, failing on one play to stretch out and make a
    		"falling catch".  Mills seemed to have grease coated hands.
    		Dwight Stone has good to great speed, but suffers from
    		bouts of the dropsies.  The rest of the reciever corp is
    		average to slightly below average, AT BEST.
    
    Kicking game--Anderson made 22 of 32 field goals this year, which is
    		a bad year for him, but should rebound next year.  He's one
    		of the best there is.  Dan Stryzinski(sp??) is an adequate
    		punter who doesn't kick them long, but gets great hang time
    		resulting in very low return numbers.  His biggest problem
    		this year was dealing with the Steelers' abscence of a 
    		qualified long-snapper.
    
    Defensive line--Aaron Jones will get one more year, AT THE MOST.  Jones
    		was forced to play in the 3-4, where his talents are NOT SUITED
    	        He may play in a 4-3 alignment this year, whic, with his
    		speed and HOPEFULLY increased maturity, he is more suited for.
    		Keith Willis is getting old and slowing down.  May have one
    		or 2 more years, tops.  Gerald Williams played good this
    		past year and will probably start again next year.  The
    		rest of the Steelers "D" line , Donald Evans, Craig Veasey,
    		etc. needs work.
    
    Linebackers--Greg Lloyd and Jerrol Williams were good at putting
    		pressure on the QB's, although Lloyd tends to flap his
    		jaws too much and also gets too damned close to drawing the
    		personal foul calls.  Bryan Hinkle needs a cane and walker
    		if he wants to continue playing.  He had a good year but
    		has slowed odwn considerably and gets beat on pass routes
    		more and more each successive season.  David Little doesn't
    		seem to play with the intensity he used to.  Hardy
    		Nickerson, if he remains healthy, is solid.
    
    Secondary--Woodson continues to be one of the best in the game.  Thomas
    		Everett got beat time and time again lasted year.  Richard
    		Shelton showed TONS of promise with his spot playing.  His
    		3 int's of Kosar, plus the "nestea plunge" were nothing
    		short of great.  David Johnson also showed signs of slowing
    		by continually getting beat.  Larry Griffin is average.
                                                                
    One plus for the team next season will be N_ M_RE J_E WALT_N.  I have
    no idea who will be at QB, but Brister wants a long term contract at
    ~$2 million per.  Lot of money for a guy who still cain't control
    HIMSELF on the field, let alone the rest of the offense.  
    
    The Steelers need to get offensive lineman who cain give whoever is QB
    3-4 seconds to throw. Plus, the running game will go nowhere without
    bolstering the O line.  The "D" line could use some help as the
    opposing QB's felt very little pressure last season.  
    
    Oh well, it's a long wait til July.
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    	
    
    
    may
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
35.536CELTIK::JACOBUshering in a new era...Sun Feb 02 1992 10:4426
    Steelers Plan "B" Unprotected List
    
    Warren Williams     RB
    Chris Calloway	WR
    David Little	LB
    Keith Willis	DE
    Delton Hall		CB
    Dan Stryzinski	P
    Keith Cash		TE
    Bryan Hinkle	LB
    Terry Long		G
    Dean Caliguire	G
    Dean Dingman	G
    Larry Griffin	S
    Kevin Smith		S
    Rob McGovern	LB
    Jeff Brady		LB
    Sean Vincent	CB
    Rick Strom		QB
    Mike Mularkey	TE
    Brian Blankenship	G
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.537JUNCO::WHITEHAIRMon Feb 03 1992 10:442
    
    	All a bunch of No-names.
35.538USCTR2::NAHEARNMon Feb 03 1992 15:4313
    Hal,
    
    You've got your head buried so deep in the Browns that it's not
    surprising that you've heard of none of the Steelers listed!!!
    
    
    To anyone with knowledge of players NOT on the Browns....what's
    happened to Delton Hall?  A coupl'a years ago he was expected to do
    great things....was he injured this past year?  I'd think that someone
    would take a chance with him via Plan B!!
    
    
    Nelly
35.539Hall & BradySHALOT::MEDVIDthe illusion is deepMon Feb 03 1992 16:0719
    
>    To anyone with knowledge of players NOT on the Browns....what's
>    happened to Delton Hall?  A coupl'a years ago he was expected to do
>    great things....was he injured this past year?  I'd think that someone
>    would take a chance with him via Plan B!!
    
    Hall has lived up to his billing.  He is a headhunter.  But that's
    about it.  No sense in having a tough hitter in the secondary if the
    receiver is five yards past him downfield.
    
    Any idea how the Steelers came up with this list?  Afterall, the new
    coaching staff really doesn't know these guys.
    
    BTW, expect Jeff Brady, if not signed by the Steelers, to be a major
    player on someone else's team.  Steelers Digest did an article on him
    mid-season titled "Good Enough To Start."  Actually, I'm surprised
    Olsavsky didn't lose his job to Brady by game 8.
    
    	--dan'l
35.540FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Feb 04 1992 11:123
    Joe Greene is now going to be Defensive Line coach of the Dolphins.
    
    John
35.541SALEM::SCALZOThe Sky is CryingTue Feb 04 1992 12:028
    re -1
    
    
    I like it!!
    
    FWIW
    
    jeff
35.542CELTIK::JACOBJust DON'T light a match!!Wed Mar 04 1992 15:3413
    Looks like Tim Worley is at it again.
    
    Read in the paper today where he has missed 2 mandatory drug tests in
    the  lasted month.  He faces a possible 1 year suspension now for
    missing these tests.
    
    All that talent and no brains to go with it.
    
    Wonder if he's related to Barry Bonds????
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.543what a waste of talentROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Mar 04 1992 15:464
    
    Worley has a load of talent.  Involvement with drugs is one possible
    explanation why he hasn't reached the level of play that was expected
    of him when he was drafted.
35.544Steelers get some help on Offensive LineCELTIK::JACOBA double flutter blast!!Thu Mar 12 1992 00:419
    
    The Steelers signed Plan B free agent Duval Love, formerly of the LA
    Rams to a 3 year $1.8 million contract.
    
    Love is an offensive guard, something the Steelers are in dire need of.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.545-Very few plan B moves-Very few plan B movesVery few plan B movesCELTIK::R_QUINNWed Apr 01 1992 22:126
    The steelers seem to make very few moves with plan B free agency.  I
    would have suspected that there would have been a few free agent moves
    on the ol.  Duval Love will certainly help.  The released Terry Long
    though or to be correct didn't invite him back.
    
    Roy L. 
35.546CELTIK::JACOBThursday is D-DayThu Apr 02 1992 00:1610
    Overall, the Steelers have signed 5 plan "B" free agents, and they're
    working at the lasted minute trying to sign QB Chuck Long.
    
    I know they've signed Duvall Love, plus the punter from Tampa Bay whose
    place Dan Stryzinski took, plus some Stan someoneorother from the
    Patriots, but I don't have all of the names available right now.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.547USCTR2::NAHEARNThu Apr 02 1992 13:048
    Punter Mark Royals
    
    OL Stan Clayton
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
35.548Draft needs and InklingsCELTIK::R_QUINNTue Apr 21 1992 21:446
    Jake,
    
    Any word on what the steeler brain trust think they need and are
    thinking about in Sunday's Draft???
    
    Roy L.
35.549From Steelers DigestSHALOT::MEDVIDanother who has maddening viewsTue Apr 21 1992 21:5935
35.550filler timeACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Apr 21 1992 22:437
    Sheesh people talking about steeenkin football this time of year. This
    is baseball time and NBA and NHL playoff time. Football is meant for
    that short time of year when not much else is happenin' Otherwise it
    doesn't serve much purpose.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.551(8^)*CELTIK::JACOBA Plotcher, hard luck Your LordshipTue Apr 21 1992 22:4913
    
    >>Sheesh people talking about steeenkin football this time of year. This
    >>is baseball time and NBA and NHL playoff time. Football is meant for
    
    What's an NBA???  Does is stand fer "Nothin' But A__holes"????
    
    What's a backsketball????
    
    
    Inquiring mindless and all that
    
    JaKe
    
35.552ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Apr 22 1992 03:316
    Jake,
    
    I suggest you stick to answering questions in the ASK Jake note :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.553SHould be a fun day, wheeling and deelings are in the makesPOPE::CBULLS::MBROOKSWed Apr 22 1992 11:1711
    Actually from mid june to august there usally no real sports on
    TV....  I very much enjoy going to see the Sox's play but I just
    cant watch baseball on TV.  IF they changed it so each batter got
    1 pitch then Id watch but when the same guy gets 7,8 or 9 pitches
    3, balls 2, strikes, 3 or 4 fould tips its just too much.....
    
    Id rather watch Golf or Tennis... and thats pretty bad.
    
    The draft is this sunday, I hope Indy doesnt screw up again.
    
    							come on pats :-)
35.554SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Apr 22 1992 11:442
       Football is the only REAL sport. The others are just time fillers. 
                                   Denny
35.555ROYALT::ASHEShe done knocked me down once...Wed Apr 22 1992 13:042
    He's just mad because the last team associated with Pittsburgh was the
    Pittsburgh Pisces... (The team from "The fish that saved Pittsburgh...)
35.556Let's get back to the Steelers anyhowsSHALOT::MEDVIDanother who has maddening viewsWed Apr 22 1992 13:558
>    He's just mad because the last team associated with Pittsburgh was the
>    Pittsburgh Pisces... (The team from "The fish that saved Pittsburgh...)
    
    Hey, come on now.  Robert Morris put up a most memorable
    down-to-the-wire battle with UCLA in the tournament...NOT!
    
    	--dan'l
    
35.557Klingler Pitt---I hope it's a ployCELTIK::R_QUINNWed Apr 22 1992 14:597
    After I posted a note yesterday about who the steelers might be looking
    at in the draft, I got most discouraging news.  Tom Donahoe Steeler
    personnel director says the Steelers would take David Klingler if he is
    still available when they pick.  He seems to think that Klingler is a
    franchise quarterback yeeesh!!!!
    
    Roy L.
35.558LUNER::BROOKSHere's a story/Of a babe named Brady ...Wed Apr 22 1992 16:035
    Klinger has 4.7 speed, a 32" vertical leap (yeah, I know, dunking
    doesn't get you much in the NFL), and most importantly - an arm like a
    cannon (I've seen him fire *flat* passes into the seams 40 yards
    downfield with ease) ... the tools are there. But I don't know if the
    coaching is (if he winds up in Pgh) ...
35.559No confidence in the sidearmersCELTIK::R_QUINNWed Apr 22 1992 16:236
    He also slings the ball sideways like Bernice and is likely to blast
    that cannon into lineman helments in the NFL.  I'm not saying he can't
    be successful as by nfl standards Kosac has is rated high but I hate to
    see him play.
    
    Roy L.
35.560How many teams wish they had taken Marino instead?SHALOT::MEDVIDanother who has maddening viewsWed Apr 22 1992 16:4011
    I seem to remember a few years ago a young Dan Marino having
    spectacular years at Pitt, being talked up as the '82 Heisman front
    runner, Jackie Sherrill leaving, Foge Fazio turning a great team into
    nothing in no time, Marino having a poor senior season, 26 NFL teams
    passing on him in the first round before Miami picked him, and Marino
    becoming one of the best QB's in NFL history.
    
    First part of that sounds very similar to the story of one David
    Klingler.
    
    	--dan'l
35.561PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Apr 22 1992 16:432
    dan'l, you forgot the part about Marino's bum knee.  Klinger doesn't
    have an injury excuse.
35.562Injury ? No. But bad O-line and defense didn't help ...LUNER::BROOKSHere's a story/Of a babe named Brady ...Wed Apr 22 1992 17:005
    No Mac, but Klinger played behind a pathetic offensive line, and I
    don't care how good you are, I've yet to see a QB look goof throwing
    from a prone position (I know - right Walt ? :-) ...
    
    Doc
35.563SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Apr 22 1992 17:333
       ...but dan'l the Pats took Tony Eason and we all know he was 10x better
    than Marino!
                                 Denny 8^)
35.564FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 22 1992 17:365
    Small nit - it's Klingler, not Klinger.
    
    John Hendry (who's sick of always having the "D" dropped from his last
    name and being confused with a steel drivin' man, a horse and/or a
    fashion designer)
35.565CELTIK::JACOBA Plotcher, hard luck Your LordshipWed Apr 22 1992 19:4812
    --dan'l
    
    I think Marino was gone from Pitt when Foge Fazio took over for his
    short-lived stint as coach.
    
    Marino's problems at Pitt in his senior year were due, in part, to a
    penchant for nose candy.  This info I got first hand from someone I
    knew who was at Pitt during the same time period and hung in the same
    crowd as Danny boy.
    
    JaKe
    
35.566FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 22 1992 20:0412
    Foge Fazio became head coach at Pitt in 1982.  The reason I remember
    about Sherrill being at Texas A&M is that the opening day of the 1982
    season lives in infamy for all of us anti-Eagles.  That day, the first
    game of St Douglas of the Heights' sophomore season, Boston College
    went down to Texas A&M and blasted the Aggies in Sherrill's debut as
    head man in Aggieland.  It began 3 years of infamy for those of us who
    barf at the sight of maroon and gold.
    
    In any event, Foge was Pitt head coach for Marino's senior year at
    Pitt.
    
    Ninj 
35.567Surprised he never addressed the rumors while at school...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 22 1992 20:3512
    
    > Marino's problems at Pitt in his senior year were due, in part, to a
    > penchant for nose candy.  This info I got first hand from someone I
    > knew who was at Pitt during the same time period and hung in the same
    > crowd as Danny boy.
    
    I was at CMU during this time and if this wasn't the truth then it was 
    only what 99% of the college scene believed to be the truth.  Danny
    Boy used to come up to the Beta house to party a bit... 
    
    glenn
    
35.568Fazio handed Marino to the DolphinsSHALOT::MEDVIDanother who has maddening viewsWed Apr 22 1992 20:4014
    JaKe, it may have been Marino and an affection for cocaine, but it was
    more Fazio than anything.  After that season ended, players openly
    stated how the team had lost drive and motivation continually
    throughout the season.  I remember reading one receiver's quote that
    stated by the fifth game, if a ball was thrown high he wouldn't jump
    for it for more fear of being hit than being yelled at by Fazio.
    
    Under Sherrill these kids played with emotion and put their talent on
    the line.  Fazio took one of the best teams in the country back in '82
    and destroyed it.  Marino, bum knee and rumored drug problems or not,
    could do nothing to keep the ship from sinking because the captain 
    didn't know how to sail.
    
    	--dan'l
35.569CELTIK::JACOBA Plotcher, hard luck Your LordshipWed Apr 22 1992 21:084
    I stand corrected.
    
    JaKe
    
35.570Amp Lee would have excited me, but boring is betterSHALOT::MEDVIDWho's got segmented eyes?Mon Apr 27 1992 16:4315
    Not as exciting as Chuck Noll's first draft, but it looks like the
    Cowher administration got some guys for the long haul:
    
    	1. Leon Searcy, ot, Miami
    	2. Levon Kirkland, lb, Clemson
    	3. Joel Steed, dt, Colorado
    	4. Charles Davenport, wr, NC State
    	5. Alan Haller, db, Michigan State
    
    All needs were addressed in proper order it seems.  Probably pick up
    more linemen and a running back today.
    
    Any info on these five is appreciated.
    
    	--dan'l
35.571SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Apr 27 1992 17:079
    
    	Yea, to draft is one thing...to sign 'em is another!  
    
    
    	Let the 'games' begin!
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.572Could be a good oneBSS::JCOTANCHMon Apr 27 1992 17:206
    Davenport is a guy I thought was kind of intriguing from what I read
    about him - he played QB for 3 and a half seasons before being switched
    to WR, and Mel Kiper said he probably would've been a top 10 pick if he
    had played WR for his full tenure at NCState.
    
    Joe
35.573Surprised he was a 3rd round pickPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Apr 27 1992 17:2217
    Any info on these five is appreciated.
    
    The only one I'm familiar with is #3, Joel Steed, dt, Colorado.
    He's a Denver native and was an all Big 8 nose tackle the last two tears. 
    You won't see many highlight films of him running over 2 or 3 blockers 
    on his way to smashing the QB. But you will see a lot of films of the 
    other teams not running in his direction. He was very solid in the middle 
    and was good at breaking up plays. He's strong but his biggest asset is 
    probably his quickness. Since he plugged up the middle so well, and 
    chased QB's and running backs from where they wanted to be, it 
    made it easier for the linebackers to make the big plays and get the 
    publicity.  
    
    All in all, he's a solid player but I didn't expect him to be drafted
    until the 5th or 6th round. 

		Keith
35.574CELTIK::JACOBA Plotcher, hard luck Your LordshipMon Apr 27 1992 19:464
    I'll put in whatever info the paper has on the first five, tonite.
    
    JaKe
    
35.575PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Apr 27 1992 20:068
>    	Yea, to draft is one thing...to sign 'em is another!  
    
>    	Let the 'games' begin!
    
  Any bets on whether we'll hear Bill Cowher say "Leon who ?"


	Keith
35.576CELTIK::JACOBA Plotcher, hard luck Your LordshipMon Apr 27 1992 20:2013
    I doubt if Cowher say "Leon WHo?   He may question the guy's will to
    play in the NFL, but he won't use Noll-isms.
    
    Cowher has started off with more appeal to the public than Noll did.
    Noll refused any kind of radio show, 'cept for the 5 minute thang on
    game day.  
    Cowher will have a 1-2 hour show(presumably WITH Myron Cope) once a
    week during the regular season.
    
    Plus, he's been showing up at fund raisers all over the city.
    
    JaKe
    
35.577CELTIK::JACOBNO JUNK....what bunk!!!!Tue Apr 28 1992 01:0860
THUMBNAIL SKETCHES OF STEELERS' CHOICES(choices 1-5)

from The Pittsburgh Press, 4-27-1992

Leon Searcy, No. 1(11th Overall Selection), T/G, Miami, 6-3 1/4, 296 lbs.
	Extremely quick athlete with outstanding strangth and excellent
hand-eye coordination. Regarded as one of the nation's premier pass protectors.
Moves well in the open and is known for his aggressive nature.  Possesses
massive legs, squatting 600 lbs, and has size 17 EEE shoes.  Ran 5.14 in the
40-yard dash.  Three year starter at tackle who has been projected as a guard
in the NFL because of his height.  1991 first team All-American by Football
Writers Association.  All Big East Conference first-team selection.  Played
last season at quick(left) tackle as Hurricanes averaged 441.3 yds per game. 
Crecited with 68 knockdowns and 84 percent grade for blocking consistency.  As
a junior, had 88 percent grade for blocking consistency and started every game
at right tackle.  Moved into starting lineup as a sophomore at right tackle and
earned praise as he developed into team's premier pass protector.  In addition
to football, lettered in track, finishing fourth in conference and district
finals in shot put and discus.  Agent is Marvin Powell.

Levon Kirkland, No. 2(38th Overall) ILB, Clemson, 6-0 1/2, 240 lbs.
	Rugged open field tackler who excells as a blitzer.  Explosive hitter
who is hard to contain in one-on-one situations and is a punishing outside
penetrator.  Played outside linebacker all four years but played inside
linebacker in Hula and Senior bowls and excelled.  Has solid pass coverage
skills and a smooth change of direction.  Timed at 4.84 in the 40.  Has 6.62
power ratio(strength based on body weight), the best total by a Clemson
linebacker in 7 years.  Bench presses 385 lbs with an 800 lb leg sled.  Has 32
1/2 inch vertical jump.  Third on team with 67 tackles, 5.5 sacks, and 12
tackles for losses.  Recovered 2 fumbles, deflected 6 passes, and had 15 QB
pressures.  4 year starter.  Was MVP of 1989 Gator Bowl against West Va. with 9
tackles, 2 sacks, and 3 stops for losses.  

Joel Steed, No. 3(67th Overall), NT, Colorado, 6-2, 285.
	Anchor of the Colorado defensive line and one of the top nose guards in
the country.  Spectacular run defender with great agility for a player his
size.  Keeps his feet when hit low and has quickness to spin off blockers.  One
of the stongest players on the team with a 425-lb bench press and 800-lb hip
sled.  Timed at 5.14 in the 40.  

Charles Davenport No. 4(94th Overall) N.C. State, 6-3 1/2, 206.
	Fine all-around athlete who return to his natural position after
playing QB his junior year.  Tall and slender reciever with a long stride in
the open.  Has terrific ability and deep acceleration.  Elusive runner after
the catch with a great reach that allows him to grab the high pass.  Will
likely be considered a possession reciever in the Steelers offense.  Very
effective in running the reverse and has good spin moves to escape defenders. 
Ran 4.57 in the 40.   Led team with 33 receptions for 558 yards and 4 TD's.  

Allen Haller, No. 5(123rd overall) CB, Michigan State, 5-10 3/4, 177 lbs.
	Tough defender who has experience at cornerback and safety.  3-year
starter at CB who moved to free safety during senior season.  Good cover man
who has good speed and strength and has strong run support.  Very Smart Player. 
Timed at 4.48 in the 40 and was a sprinter for 3 years for the Michigan State
track team.  Projected as good special teams player and CB and/or nickel back
in secondary./  Made 77 tackles last season, his 3rd as a starter.  


JaKe

35.578Steelers drafted some great wordsSHALOT::HUNTHappy Happy, Joy JoyTue Apr 28 1992 13:2510
35.579COMET::JACKSONTAHangManTue Apr 28 1992 15:258
      re-1
    
      Agree,  but its that way for every team.
    
      Does anyone have an average of how many drafties are actually kept by
    a team?
    
      Tim
35.580Steelers filling all the holesSHALOT::MEDVIDWho's got segmented eyes?Tue Apr 28 1992 16:3319
    7 - Russ Campbell, TE, Kansas St.
    7 - Scottie Graham, RB, Ohio St.
    8 - Darren Perry, DB, Penn St.
    8 - Hesham Ismail, G, Florida
    8 - Nate williams, DT, Mississippi St.
    9 - Elnardo Webster, LB, Rutgers
    10 - Mike Saunders, RB, Iowa
    11 - Kendall Gammons, G, Pittsburg St.
    12 - Cornelius Benton, QB, U Conn.
    
    If Eric Green and Adrian Cooper, the two best tight ends in the NFL
    right now, didn't spell the end of Mike Mularky I would think that the
    drafting of a third monster in the seventh round does.  Don't know
    anything about Campbell, but he must be something for the Steelers to
    want to grab him already having Big Green and Coop.  
    
    Any info on these guys is, again, appreciated.  
    
    	--dan'l
35.581Yep, he's a good onePEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Apr 28 1992 17:0320
>    7 - Russ Campbell, TE, Kansas St.
    
>  Don't know anything about Campbell, but he must be something for the 
>  Steelers to want to grab him already having Big Green and Coop.  
    
>    Any info on these guys is, again, appreciated.  
    
   I've seen Campbell play a couple of times. Since he played for Kansas State,
   the doormat of the Big 8 until last year, it was ussually hard to get
   the ball to him. But once the ball was thrown anywhere near him, he ussually 
   made a good catch and was pretty good running with it also. It's too bad
   he had such a lousy team around him for most of his college career.
   Otherwise he may have gotten more publicity. I also remember watching
   him play in the Japan bowl. They threw to him often and he was very effective
   in helping the team. In fact, he was probably the standout receiver in that
   game. I see his strongest asset as being able to get open and to catch the 
   ball. But I don't see him as the type of guy that can run over tacklers 
   and punish the defensive backs like Cooper and Greene.

		Keith
35.582FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 28 1992 17:1312
    There is actually a pretty high turnover in the NFL each year - about
    25%.  On the average, a career lasts 4 years or less.  I couldn't tell
    you, though, how many of the guys drafted each year on average play
    long enough to reach the 4 year mark.  I'm willing to bet it's less
    than 100 out of the 336 taken each year.
    
    Drafting is an art, not a science.  At best, it's a crapshoot.  The
    work scouting departments do in evaluating players is at best only an
    attempt to improve the odds.  It's not as bad as baseball though, where
    even fewer draftees make it every year.
    
    John
35.583EARRTH::BROOKSPrince &gt; MadonnaTue Apr 28 1992 17:413
    Is it me, or did this draft seem to have less so-called 'impact player'
    talent ? Not to mention what seemed to be a glut of linemen and
    linebackers taken ?
35.584Did Cohwer keep J_e Walt_n ?EARRTH::BROOKSPrince &gt; MadonnaTue Apr 28 1992 17:421
    
35.585his ole buddy gave him a jobCNTROL::CHILDSwill forgive us now, for wasting the dawnTue Apr 28 1992 18:266
nope he's in Philly now to help retard Randall's progress....

 ;^)

mike
35.586Parade in January - 2093 !EARRTH::BROOKSTwentyfive or 6 to 4 ...Tue Apr 28 1992 19:152
    Oh no .... he *will* retard RC's game ... about the only guy who will
    benefit will be Keith Jackson.
35.587CELTIK::JACOBNO JUNK..whadda buncha BUNK!!!Tue Apr 28 1992 19:519
    Steelers new OC is ron Erhardt(sp?).
    
    Erhardt was on Myron COpe's radio show lasted night and stated that the
    offense will be a power back style offense, with lotsa blocking and
    possession type stuff by the tight ends.  Mularkey has stated that he
    will probably retire cause of his knees, and would like to go into
    coaching.
    
    JaKe
35.588CELTIK::JACOBWhere'll we get L.A.LAW Reports??Tue Apr 28 1992 21:259
    
>>11 - Kendall Gammons, G, Pittsburg St.
                             
    Rumor has it that Gammons was taken because he is a very good
    "long-snapper".  His play at other locations on the offensive line is
    said to be fair at best.
    
    JaKe
      
35.589should have studied HBAHBA::HAASMental ModelWed Apr 29 1992 21:174
Just heard the Worley was suspended from the NFL for "at least" 1 year.
He failed to show up at a couple of urine tests.

TTom
35.590Worley go to the Barry Bonds school of thoughtCELTIK::JACOBGimme a beer and a junk noteThu Apr 30 1992 01:1611
    
    Worley says he missed the urine tests because he and some fellow NFL
    players decided to go to the NCAA's.
    
    I sure hope he had one helluva good time cause with being suspended
    without pay, he's going to miss out and more than a million $$$
    in pay.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.591Steelers 92 ScheduleSHALOT::MEDVIDi can't lick that farThu May 07 1992 15:4918
    
    9/6		@Houston
    9/13	NY Jets
    9/20	@San Diego
    9/27	@Green Bay
    10/4	open
    10/11	@Cleveland
    10/19	Cincinnati (Monday Night)
    10/25	@Kansas City
    11/1	Houston
    11/8	@Buffalo
    11/15	Detroit
    11/22	Indianapolis
    11/29	@Cincinnati
    12/6	Seattle
    12/13	@Chicago
    12/20	Minnesota
    12/27	Cleveland
35.592My picksSHALOT::MEDVIDi can't lick that farThu May 07 1992 16:0123
    Pittsburgh got away with a pretty easy home schedule.  If they can win
    some of those home games and not get upset on the road, they could go
    10-6. Just so I don't get accused of Halpocrisy(tm), here's my picks to
    justify that prediction:
    
    9/6		@Houston	L 0-1
    9/13	NY Jets		L 0-2
    9/20	@San Diego	L 0-3
    9/27	@Green Bay	W 1-3
    10/4	open
    10/11	@Cleveland	W 2-3
    10/19	Cincinnati (Monday Night)	W 3-3
    10/25	@Kansas City	L 3-4
    11/1	Houston		W 4-4
    11/8	@Buffalo	L 4-5
    11/15	Detroit		W 5-5
    11/22	Indianapolis	W 6-5
    11/29	@Cincinnati	W 7-5
    12/6	Seattle		W 8-5
    12/13	@Chicago	L 8-6
    12/20	Minnesota	W 9-6
    12/27	Cleveland	W 10-6
    
35.593COMET::JACKSONTAHangManThu May 07 1992 21:281
      Fairly easy IMO.
35.594UPI: Woodson and brother arrestedFORTSC::MOKThu May 21 1992 16:5426
Subject: Steeler Rod Woodson, brother arrested
Date: Thu, 21 May 92 7:51:13 PDT
 
	FORT WAYNE, Ind. (UPI) -- Police arrested Pittsburgh Steelers
cornerback Rod Woodson and his brother, who fought in their parents home
about whether to remove life support from their terminally ill father.
	Woodson, 27, and his mother, Linda, had agreed life support should be
removed, but expected the football player's brother, Jamie, 28, to
object violently when he learned of their decision, they told officers.
They called police to the scene Tuesday night as a precaution, but
things got out of hand anyway.
	Officers said Jamie punched Rod in the face and the two policemen on
hand were hit by both brothers. The officers eventually calmed, arrested
and jailed the brothers.
	Preliminary charges of aiding in battery to a police officer and
resisting arrest were brought against Rod Woodson. Jamie was charged
with battery to Rod and to an officer and resisting arrest.
	They appeared in court Wednesday. Rod Woodson, a former Purdue
University star, was released on $1,500 bond; Jamie on $2,000 bond.
	A deputy prosecutor said the Allen County prosecutor's office wanted
72 hours to review the incident before bringing formal charges. The
brother's next court appearance, officials said, could be as soon as
Friday but would likelier be Tuesday.
	Police said the ailing father is in a Fort Wayne hospital, but they
lacked details on his ailment or condition. He became ill sometime
during the past year.
35.595QUASER::JACKSONTAPlayoff boundThu May 21 1992 17:175
      re-1  Thats to bad.  That kinda of decision has got to be tough. 
    Some close friends of mine had to make that decision last week.  I hope
    they work it out and do the right thing.
    
    	tim
35.596RANGER::LEFEBVREPC's 'R UsThu May 21 1992 17:346
    As one that has been through what the Woodson's have been through, I
    hope that the police and judge are lenient.  When someone dear is
    obviously suffering, it is difficult at best to keep one's cool when
    deciding whether to terminate life support for a loved one.
    
    Mark.
35.597CELTIK::JACOBLosing it from all the right placesWed Jun 17 1992 23:0010
    The Steelers signed Walter Brister to a one year + option contract
    yesterday.  Other terms have not been disclosed.  Brister had surgery
    on his bad knee in Feb. but is expected to be in mini-camp at the end
    of the month.
    
    The Steelers also signed Hardy Nickerson to a one year contract
    yesterday.
    
    JaKe
    
35.598$1.3 mil not bad for #2 stringerCELTIK::R_QUINNThu Jun 18 1992 14:336
    Atlanta Journal says $1.3 mill plus incentives that could make it a $2
    mill deal.  Still not bad for a guy who ended up as a second stringer
    last year.
    
    Roy L.
    
35.599QUASER::JACKSONTAThanks for charging us for your screw up!Thu Jun 18 1992 19:401
      Marc Wilson all over again
35.600PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Jun 29 1992 19:5123
  What's new with the Steelers ? Are they having any luck signing their
  draft choices ? It looks like Cowher has taken some major steps (plan B
  and drafting Leon Searcy) to improve their biggest weakness, the offensive
  line. So far, I like what he's done but we won't know how successful he's
  been until they play a few games this fall.

  A few months ago, I put in my opinion of Joel Steed, their 3rd round draft 
  pick. I was surprised they drafted him so high. I expected him to go in the
  6th or 7th round. Recently, I watched a tape of an old Colorado/Nebraska
  game when Steed was a sophmore. In that game, Steed looked awesome. Then
  I learned, that at the end of his junior year, he was picked by many people
  to be a 1st round pick the next year. Well, the summer before his senior
  year he got some rare disease and started the season 40 lbs below his normal
  playing weight. Then he broke his hand and later hurt his foot. Thus,
  he had less playing time and wasn't as effective his senior year. None of
  these problems were career threatening and he's now fully recovered. I've
  heard one draft expert say that he was a wasted 3rd round pick and another
  draft expert say that he may be one of the biggest steals in the draft. 
  After watching that tape of him as a sophmore, I'm more optimistic that 
  he can make some major contributions playing defensive tackle or nose tackle
  for the Steelers.(which is an area where they do need help).

		Keith
35.601CELTIK::JACOBSun-ripened for Mildness!Mon Jul 06 1992 21:236
    Searcy remains unsigned.
    
    Mike Mularkey(TE) was put on waivers.
    
    JaKe
    
35.602CELTIK::JACOBSun-ripened for Mildness!Tue Jul 21 1992 19:5715
    Don't have much news on the Steelers since the damned newspaper is
    still on strike, BUT, they plan to be printing a paper starting maybe
    Friday, so maybe nexted week, I cain get some updates.
    
    Barry Foster, who is under contract until after this year, still has
    not shown up in camp.  The Steelers have evidently told him stay away
    much longer, and he might as well never return, as the new offense
    supposedly won't need any feature back, whatever that means.
    
    Top 2 or 3 picks are still unsigned, Searcy reportedly because of the
    "slotting" process in determining how much a guy gets by looking at the
    guy picked right ahead of him's contract.
    
    JaKe
    
35.603What we need is an offense with no feature QBSHALOT::MEDVIDdancin' pretzelsTue Jul 21 1992 20:3920
>    Barry Foster, who is under contract until after this year, still has
>    not shown up in camp.  The Steelers have evidently told him stay away
>    much longer, and he might as well never return, as the new offense
>    supposedly won't need any feature back, whatever that means.
    
    Here we go again.  This has shades of Chuck Noll all over it.  For
    once, I'm on the athlete's side.  Barry Foster has run his heart out
    for Pittsburgh on the contract he signed as a hardship rookie.  He is
    one of the most talented players on the offense.  What's Pittsburgh's
    problem with giving the kid what he deserves?  Or is he asking way too
    much?
    
    No feature back?  I guess that means I can suit up and be at St.
    Vincents for a tryout, huh?  This scares me.
    
    BTW, I heard that Kowher was in a car wreck last week.  True?  What's
    the scoop? 
    
    	--dan'l
    
35.604CELTIK::JACOBSun-ripened for Mildness!Tue Jul 21 1992 23:1124
    
    >>once, I'm on the athlete's side.  Barry Foster has run his heart out
    >>for Pittsburgh on the contract he signed as a hardship rookie.  He is
    >>one of the most talented players on the offense.  What's Pittsburgh's
    >>problem with giving the kid what he deserves?  Or is he asking way too
    >>much?
    
    One fact stands out through each side of the story, Barry Foster IS
    UNDER CONTRACT for one more year.  Who's he think he is, Mike
    Merriweather????   (8^)*
    
    >>BTW, I heard that Kowher was in a car wreck last week.  True?  What's
    >>the scoop? 
    
    Nothing but a minor fender bender.  No injuries, 'cept egos that was
    hurt.
    
    BTW, on Myron Cope's radio show tonight he said Cowher has set a weight
    ceiling of 275 for Eric Green.  When asked if he thinks Green cain get
    to 275, Cowher replied that he (Green) will reach 275 by this weekend.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.605SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Jul 22 1992 18:0210
    
    	re: foster
    
    	I also read some quotes from Foster in USA TODAY that were not
    to favorable for Steeler management.  It all came out after the
    NFL trial where the owners salary and profit/loss statements were made
    public.
    
    							bill..g.
    
35.606PFSVAX::JACOBTue Aug 04 1992 19:3918
    The Steelers signed Searcy, so he's now in camp.
    
    All Steeler draft picks have now been signed and there are 4 veterans
    still holding out, Louis Lipps, Carnell Lake, Thomas Everett, and Tunch
    Ilkin.
    
    Steelers firsted pre-season game is Saturday at Three Rivers Stadium
    and today I gots a call on the tellyfone axing if me and Mrs. JaKe
    wanted to attend FOR FREE!!
    
    Hot Damn, free tickets, in a corporate box, food and drunk, er, drink
    provided, wonder if'n they gots a waterbed in there, too???
    (8^)*
    
    Oh well, back to work
    
    JaKe
    
35.607So Barry reported, eh?SHALOT::MEDVIDthere is really no-one leftTue Aug 04 1992 19:565
    JaKe, from your note can I presume that Mr. Foster came to his legal
    senses and reported to camp...unlike Mr. Merriweather or Mr.
    Washington?
    
    	--dan'l
35.608PFSVAX::JACOBTue Aug 04 1992 20:066
    Yeah, Foster has been in camp for a week or two, don't know exactly
    when, cause I was out of town, and there still ain't any newspapers
    here that are worth a damn, so cain't tell ya exactly when.
    
    JaKe
    
35.609Must be some good West Virginny papers around!CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Aug 04 1992 20:091
    
35.610SHALOT::MEDVIDthere is really no-one leftTue Aug 04 1992 20:125
>              -< Must be some good West Virginny papers around! >-
    
    You mean the Mom and Pop variety, better known there as Brother and
    Sister.
    
35.611ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Aug 04 1992 21:0338
    
    JaKe...
    
    the
    
    Steelers
    
    are
    
    going ------------------------------------------------.
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          |
    
                                                          |
                                                          |
                                                          v
    
    
    
                          DDDDD     OOOOOO   W               W  N    N  !!!
                          D    D    O    O    W             W   NN   N  !!!
                          D     D   O    O     W     W     W    N N  N  !!!
                          D     D   O    O      W   W W   W     N  N N  !!!
                          D    D    O    O       W W   W W      N   NN
                          DDDDD     OOOOOO        W     W       N    N  !!!
    
    
    BTW, how do you like the new noting style, commonly referred to as
    iceNOTES (c).
35.612PFSVAX::JACOBTue Aug 04 1992 21:4413
    
    Where, DOWN with the Brown(spot)s(tm)????
    
    
    
    >>BTW, how do you like the new noting style, commonly referred to as
    >>iceNOTES (c).
    
    Just like a Brown(spot)s(tm) fan, all hype and no content!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.613exitROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Aug 04 1992 22:2819
    
    Its
    
    all
    
    blue
    
    smoke
    
    and
    
    mirrors!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    
    
    
    !
35.614PFSVAX::JACOBTue Aug 04 1992 22:3110
    Lessee, Groaner, you're just COPYING the style that Hal used the first
    year or two he was in here, nothing original.  How fitting, how
    fitting.
    
    Re blue smoke and mirrors, nah I doubt it, more like you're just
    blowing smoke out your....er I better not continue this sentence cause 
    it could get me set hidden for the first time in ages.
    
    JaKe
    
35.615SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 05 1992 11:463
       Well, we only have to read the 1st line a his notes now, that's
    refreshing!
                                     Denny
35.616In a dilemma(sp?)CELTIK::JACOBSun-ripened for Mildness!Thu Aug 06 1992 20:2615
    HELP!!!!
    
    Anybody know a babysitter that travels???????
    
    I needs a babysitter for Saturday night.  If'n we don't get one, we
    don't go to the game!!!!
    
    Saturday  should be a most ecksallent night, though.  Going to go down
    to Pittsburgh earlier in the day and take in some of the Three Rivers
    Regatta, including the 25 lap Formula 1 boat races, then to the Steeler
    game, then a big fireworks and laser show at the "Point" after the
    game.
    
    JaKe
    
35.617PFSVAX::JACOBFri Aug 07 1992 20:4533
    Do you believ this sh_t!!!
    
    Had free admission to the Steeler game tomorrow night, and cain't go
    cause we cain't find a babysitter!!!!!
    
    (8^(*
    
    The tickets were to be from a friend of my wife's who was looking for
    another couple to go with them, but seeing as we cain't shake the
    rugrats for the night, both of us cain't go, and the operative word was
    "couple".
    
    Supposedly, these tickets for the corporate box will pop up during the
    season, too, when all of the babysitters ain't on freakin' vacation.
    
    So, tomorrow, me and Mrs. JaKe will just have to load up the troops and
    spend the day at the Three Rivers Regatta, watching the F1 boats, and
    the water ski  shows, and (me, mainly) the scantily clad wimmens that
    attend these things, and drinking ber after beer after beer, and having
    grilled sausage sandwiches, and gyros, and, ah sh!t, I'm sorta dieting,
    ain't I, ah, the hell with the diet for tomorrow, ?I'm going to enjoy
    myself if it kills me, just no Steeler game.
    
    Doubt I'll stay for the Fireworks and Laser show at 9:45, either, cause
    the kids will be mondo whiney, and there'll be 250,000 other idiots
    there, and traffic would take about 3 hours to get thru, ah shit, I may
    just stay home tomorrow and strip the baseboard in the "This Old
    Freakin' House" I live in.
    
    Not attneding the Steeler game, and major bummed
    
    JaKe
    
35.618Where's your sense of adventure?SHALOT::MEDVIDthere is really no-one leftFri Aug 07 1992 20:587
    JaKe,
    
    leave the wife at home and call an escort service.  Perhaps Pepper is
    free.  You'll just have to wash the lipstick off a yo haid before you
    go home.
    
    	--dan'l
35.619Ain't that a shame ...ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Aug 07 1992 22:0014
    JaKe,
    
    You should have called me. I got a brother in Pittsburgh. Could have
    visited him for the weekend and baby sat on Sat. night. Of course I am
    not sure that you would be willing to pay the price.
    
    Price would have been that your p-name would have to read
    
    Mets in '92
    
    until after the baseball season.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.620probibly better this wayJUNCO::WHITEHAIRSat Aug 08 1992 10:097
    
    	Jake,
    		No matter, you would have gotten depressed once you saw
    how lowsey you team really is.
    
    		WOOF!
    
35.621SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Aug 10 1992 03:583
       The little Jakes must be like the Simpsons eh? Nobody wants ta watch
    'em!
                                  Denny  8^)
35.622High Scoring Game//No D or Good OCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Aug 10 1992 14:415
    Jake,
    
    I know you're teeeeeeeed still but any post game reports.
    
    Roy L.
35.623PFSVAX::JACOBMon Aug 10 1992 19:4720
    As usual, Brister looked like cow excrement, Strom only fair, and
    O'Donnell, even though he was playing mopup in the 4th quarter, added
    some excitement to the game by bringing them to the Iggles 25 or so
    with 4 seconds left, but the Steelers lined up without a tackle,
    slammed the ball into the ground to stop the clock, incurred the
    illegal formation penalty, and the refs ran 10 seconds off of the
    clock, therefore ending the game at 35-33, as there was only 2 seconds
    left BEFORE the penalty.
    
    I have to take a call about 110 miles from here in a little while, but
    I'll get all the stats and some synopsis of the Steeler performance in
    here if I get back here tonight, or if I get a chance tomorrow night.
    
    Steelers .vs. The Saints nexted Monday, O'Donnell gets his turn at
    starting QB.
    
    Overall, the Steelers looked pretty lousy Saturday night.
    
    JaKe
    
35.624TV????????MKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Fri Aug 14 1992 11:488
Does anyone know if the Steeler - Saints game is supposed to be on 
ABC Monday Night Football?  I'd much rather see this one than the Bills-Lions.

I was pretty impressed with O'Donnell last year and would like to see him 
given the nod over Brister.  Has Lipps signed yet?

Bill

35.625PFSVAX::JACOBGetting older by the minuteFri Aug 14 1992 19:336
    As far as I know, Lipps is still holding out.  ABC is showing the
    Bills-Lions here in Pgh., so I doubt if they'll be showing the
    Steeler-Saints debacle anywhere.
    
    JaKe
    
35.626BSS::JCOTANCHFri Aug 14 1992 19:583
    Bills-Lions is on ESPN, not ABC.
    
    Joe
35.627Q'sSHALOT::MEDVIDSeasick, yet still dockedMon Aug 17 1992 15:1811
    A. Why are the Steelers and Saints playing tonight if the game isn't
    going to be on ABC or ESPN?
    
    B. Is it being played in Pittsburgh or New Orleans?
    
    C. What time does it start?
    
    D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
    shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
    ripe young age of 21), and not score?  
    
35.628CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntMon Aug 17 1992 15:2911
>    D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
>    shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
>    ripe young age of 21), and not score?  


Why ask why?



    

35.629QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Mon Aug 17 1992 15:411
      Bad breath maybe?
35.630Maybe we shoulda had Tic-TacsSHALOT::MEDVIDSeasick, yet still dockedMon Aug 17 1992 15:507
    >      Bad breath maybe?
    
    Nope.  In fact my friend and I were making light of the fact that there
    was "no way we'll would strike out tonight.  We have gum."
    
    Now, back to the Steelers Saints...
    
35.631good questionsMKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Mon Aug 17 1992 16:2912
	a.  I'm stumped on this one.

	b.  New Orleans

	c.  7:40pm

	d.  No clue

I guess .500 isn't too bad

Bill
35.632wrong positioning of the potato??SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Aug 17 1992 17:5220
    
    re: dan'l
    
    
>    D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
>    shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
>    ripe young age of 21), and not score?  
    
    
    	Next time, stick the potato in the front of your pants...
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
    p.s. just got back from the Steel City and if it's any consolation, 
    you'll probably be glad the Steeler's aren't on national t.v. cause
    they are not a pretty sight.  But I'm sure if you hop on down to your
    local tavern with a dish, they could probably find the uplink to the
    Steel City cause the Steelers will be on back there (I think).
    
35.633PFSVAX::JACOBGetting older by the minuteMon Aug 17 1992 19:3811
    
    >>D. Why did I go to that bar last night, dance with women who
    >>shouldn't be able to bend their bodies the way they did (even at the
    >>ripe young age of 21), and not score?  
    
    Shot hit the post?????????
    
    Re-.1  Rollward!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.634what a drubbingPFSVAX::JACOBGetting older by the minuteTue Aug 18 1992 03:2810
    Steelers get their clocks cleaned, 26-0 at the hands of the Saints.
    
    In the QB duel, NOBODY looked good.
    
    Jerry Olsavski(sp?), LB, suffered a broken bone in his hand.
    
    Duvall Love suffered a bad sprain of the ankle.
    
    JaKE
    
35.635PFSVAX::JACOBBush=Truly a Legend in his own mindMon Aug 24 1992 13:1713
    STEELERS  	28
    Bears	17
    
    Neil O'Donnell, IMHO, takes the lead in the QB race.
    
    Woodson hurt, out 3 weeks(and the first game of the season is against
    the Oilers, sh*t).
    David Johnson hurt also, out 2-4 weeks.
    
    Time to sign Thomas Everett.
    
    JaKe
    
35.636PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Aug 24 1992 15:3823
  I finally got to see the Steeler's play last night. It looks like they're
  making some progress especially in the weakest spot, the offensive line.

  I'm not sure that O'Donnell has won the QB race yet. He played well last
  night but so did Brister. But Brister was going up against Chicago's 
  1st string defense. When O'Donnell played, the Bears were freely substituting 
  the younger players while the Steeler's basically used their first 
  string offense until the middle of the 4th quarter. Also, Harbaugh had
  an incredible performance in the first half which limited the playing time
  of Brister and the Steeler offense.

  It looks like Joel Steed played well. He had half a sack and caused a fumble
  by running down a QB 15 yards away from his area of responsibility. After
  the fumble, the momentum really went the Steeler's way. Adrian Cooper looked
  as good as Eric Green and finally Graham and Mills have made some 
  contributions. I really liked the reverse to Dwight Stone. With his speed,
  I can't understand why the Steeler's haven't used him in the reverse more in 
  the past.
  
  A win is a win, but I doubt that they would have won if Harbaugh had played
  the whole game. 

	Keith
35.637SHALOT::MEDVIDI will feel so glad to goMon Aug 24 1992 20:158
>  I really liked the reverse to Dwight Stone. With his speed,
>  I can't understand why the Steeler's haven't used him in the reverse more in 
>  the past.
    
    I can.  Joe Walton.
    
    	--dan'l
    
35.638Who's RunningSALEM::HARRIS_KThu Aug 27 1992 20:263
    Who looks to be the #1 ball carrier, Hoge or Foster????
    
    Kenn
35.639PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineThu Aug 27 1992 20:3710
    Ya know, it's a crime.  There are no WORTHY newspapers here in
    Pittsburgh right now, and I don't watch hardly ANY television, hell, I
    haven't even caught any of the radio sports shows recently, so all I
    know about the Steelers right now is that they're 1-2 in preseason.
    
    Maybe I'll go home and call my Dad tonite, cause he has all the info
    handy.
    
    JaKe
    
35.640ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Aug 27 1992 20:5111
    Papers are still on strike? How long has it been?
    
    Do people with subscriptions to out of town papers (NY Times, Wall
    Street Journal) get there papers delivered??
    
    Last newspaper strike in NY was man years ago (last 1970's) and it was
    only for a few weeks and it was very frustrating for even a short
    period of time. How do theatres advertise movies, stores advertise
    sales, etc??
    
    The Crazy Met
35.641QUASER::JACKSONTAAvoid TAP, keep back against wallThu Aug 27 1992 21:128
    re-1  Advertise on tv maybe?  Let the theaters show times as new movies
    are being pushed.  
    
      Who cares about grocery stores?   They are the biggest ripoffs next
    to gas stations!  If you save .20 cents on one thing,  you pay .30
    cents extra for something else.
    
    	Tim
35.642MtM, Is this sports related??? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeFri Aug 28 1992 03:061
    
35.643PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineFri Aug 28 1992 12:1919
    The Pgh Press is on strike, or lockout or whatever the hell you want to
    call it.  The little local papers, ie community by community type have
    minute coverage, so to get good coverage of the Steelers, I guess I'll
    have to get a subscription to "Steelers' Digest".  
    
    The paper has been out for over 3 months now. There are actually 2
    papers here, the Pittsburgh Press and the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. 
    Only the Press is actually on strike, but since the Post-Gazette uses
    all of the Press' equipment under some kind of special agreement, they
    cain't put out a paper, either.
    
    Yes, TCM, out of town papers get delivered.  A very good friend of mine
    works 2 hours each night delivering 72 papers, and Sunday he delivers
    90 papers, I think it's the New York Times or some other NY paper.  HE
    gets paid $150 a week for 14 hours work, so I cain only imagine what
    the people getting the paper are PAYING for it.
    
    JaKe
    
35.644PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineFri Aug 28 1992 12:2418
    Neil O'Donnell will get the start in the Steelers pre-season finale.
    Brister will play some or all of the second half.
                                         
    With the paper strike here, 2 radios stations have attained the
    services of Pgh. Press sportswriters Bob SMizik and Gene Collier.
    Both, this morning, agree that Cowher should go with O'Donnell this
    season, cause this team is going nowhere this year.  They said if the
    team had a chance at the playoffs, Brister would be the choice, but
    since they are exssentially in a rebuild, go with O'donnell and groom
    him for the future.
                                                    
    Lipps is still holding out, and IMHO, the Steelers should just release
    him.  He hasn't been the force he was in his first year or two and I
    think the game is passing him by.  He ain't worth big bucks as he
    thinks he is.
    
    JaKe
    
35.645more...SHALOT::MEDVIDI will feel so glad to goFri Aug 28 1992 17:398
    Accoridng to Steelers Digest, Hoge will still be the primary ball
    carrier.
    
    Latest issue features Dwight Stone and his all-pro potential.  After
    reading it, I gotta believe with a new offensive scheme Stone might
    become a star.
    
    	--dan'l
35.646PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineMon Aug 31 1992 11:4711
    Steelers waltz over Giants Sat. Night, 24-3.
    
    O'Donnell had a very impressive first half, while Brister's very first
    pass of the game was, you guessed it, and interception.
    
    O'Donnell appears to have won the starting job, so I'll try to catch
    some radio news this week and as soon as I hear something, I'll get it
    in here.
    
    JaKe
    
35.647CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntMon Aug 31 1992 12:105
And I can tell by Handley's post-game comments that the man is much
more clueless than I ever imaginged....


'Saw
35.648????????CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeMon Aug 31 1992 12:187
    pray tell Chainsaw,
    
    Wot did he say?
    
    deen to wonk,
    Kev
    
35.649CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntMon Aug 31 1992 12:2217
>    pray tell Chainsaw,
>    
>    Wot did he say?
>    
>    deen to wonk,
>    Kev


Oh, a lot of doublespeak about continuity and sh*t like that.


They're plagued by the same thing as always.....no problem until they
hit the Red Zone.....


'Saw    

35.650Neil O at the helm of the Steelers' OPFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineMon Aug 31 1992 21:3213
    
    THE GREAT QB DEBATE IS OVER!!!!!
    
    Neil O'Donnell will be the Steelers starting QB this year.
    
    The Steelers made some moves today, including cutting OL Tom 
    tickets, a 1st round pick a couple of years ago, and QB Rick Strom,
    perenially a last cut, then they'll pick him back up in a week or so.
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
35.651QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesMon Aug 31 1992 21:537
      Its only over for the 1st week.  If O'donnel starts doing bad, 
    Boobsy will probably step in, but not up!  The faiders have the same
    delima,  what QB do we want to lose with?
    
      HTH
    
    	Tim
35.652PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineMon Aug 31 1992 22:5416
    Tim,
    
    I ain't so sure about that.  Brister has had 6+ years to show
    somehting, and he's shown a penchant for throwing interceptions,
    throwing stupid passes, and dancing around behind the line.
    
    I think Cowher will go with O'Donnell and give the guy a real chance,
    not just a game or two.  This is a team much in the need of a
    direction, and flipping Brister in there at the first sign of trouble
    would prove nothing.  I say let Neil play, and take the consequences,
    and let the guy learn during the year.  That way, in a year or two or
    three, Brister will be drinking beer and passing gas and watching the
    games on the tube, whilst Neil O leads the Steelers to SB ring #5.
    
    JaKe
    
35.653ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Tue Sep 01 1992 02:141
    The backfield looks like Hoge and Williams?
35.654SALEM::DODARedSox Magic # 911Tue Sep 01 1992 13:051
What about Foster?
35.655O'Donnell deserves it, by the way!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 01 1992 14:2614
    >> The faiders have the same delima,  what QB do we want to lose with?
    
    >> HTH
    
    >> Tim
    
    Tell me something Tim, how many times have the faids lost to the donks
    with Schroeder leading the faids and Bucky leading the donks? 
    
    In the lasted five years or so (since Schroeder took over) it's gotta
    be something like 8-2 or 7-3, in favor of Schroeder. Of course the
    donks probably ain't much of a yardstick though huh? :-)
    
    Carlitos
35.656I knew this would stir ya up;^)QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesTue Sep 01 1992 16:2614
      Come-on Carlos,  Jay can take credit for one of those wins, Bo takes
    credit for 1, and the rest should go to the faids defense.  The win Jay
    can take credit for is the monday nighter at mile hi that saw the faids
    down 24-0 at half,  but came back to win 30-27 or something like that.
    
      Other than that,  I can't recall anything that he has done.
    
      You would be smiling big time if you had Elway instead of Shread.?!
    
    
    
       Next week will be fun to watch as long as I'm in town!
    
    	Tim
35.657WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MRAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!!Tue Sep 01 1992 16:493
    
    
          I'd be smilin Bigtime if I had O'Donnell instead of Shred...
35.658defense can't do it alone!ELMAGO::CGRIEGOTue Sep 01 1992 17:2913
    Ok, I'll give you that the defense played a big part in those wins, but
    still, the faids' offense (with shredder at the helm) had to put more
    points on the board than the doinks in order to win, which he did.
    Now either the doinks defense must have really sucked, if shredder's as
    bad as you claim. Or else it's something else, and everybody knows that
    the doinks defense has been pretty good recently (weren't they ranked
    #1 in the AFC lasted year). So basically, schredder must be doing
    something in order for the faids to be dominating the doinks like they
    have been since he's been around. :-)
    
    By the way Mark, I think I'd rather have Bucky than O'Donnell.
    
    Carlitos
35.659Bucky would rather have the Raiders "O" Line tooQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Sep 02 1992 20:466
    Hey...  Move this Crap to the Broncos or Raiders conference.  We don't
    want to talk football in a topic that has nothing to do with it !!
    
    ~/~
    
    BG
35.660PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineWed Sep 02 1992 23:4627
    Huey Richardson. lasted years #1 draft pick, was dealt away to the
    Redskins today for an undisclosed draft pick, rumored ot be a middle
    rounder.
    
    So, in 3 days this week, the Steelers have gotten rid of last years #1,
    and 2 years ago's 2nd first round pick(Tom RIcketts).  This only shows
    the ineptitude of the former Steeler staff in the draft over the lasted
    10 years.  Rod Woodson and Eric Green are the onlyu 2 1st rounders that
    have been worth a damn.
    
    I think Cowher had little problem getting rid of these former 1st
    rounders because they weren't his picks.  Had they been his picks,
    would he have been so quick to get rid of them???
    
    Also, heard that in lasted weeks win over the Giants, Cowher was giving
    verbal counselling to Richardson and Richardson started arguing with
    Cowher, and was wagging his finger in Cowher's face and coming also
    close to hitting him.  With Cowher being a YOUNG head coach, some
    players are going to test him to see what they cain get away with.  I
    don't know if getting rid of Richardson has anything to do with the
    incident Sat. night, but it sort of sends a message to anybody who
    might have ideas of going against Cowher.
    
    JMHO
    
    JaKe
    
35.661Good example where 1st rounders' salaries are out of handSHALOT::MEDVIDthe same deep water as youThu Sep 03 1992 17:485
    Keith Olberman (or however you spell it) on ESPN, said Huey Richardson's
    stats for the Steelers last year were 2 tackles...he got paid $750,000
    a piece for them.
    
    	--dan'l
35.662PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineThu Sep 03 1992 20:169
    >>Keith Olberman (or however you spell it) on ESPN, said Huey Richardson's
    >>stats for the Steelers last year were 2 tackles...he got paid $750,000
    >>a piece for them.
    
    Hail, for that kinda $$$, I'll go make a tackle or two.  For that
    matter, they cain pay me $100k per tackle, and I won't bitch about it.
    
    JaKe
    
35.663Has he signed yet?MKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Thu Sep 03 1992 20:243
    What's the latest on Lipps (of the Louis variety)?
    
    Bill
35.664Lipps jokes starting again....CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadThu Sep 03 1992 20:421
Lipps has kissed his contract goodby...
35.665PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineThu Sep 03 1992 20:434
    I seriously doubt if Lipps will ever stand in another Steeler huddle.
    
    JaKe
    
35.666PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineThu Sep 03 1992 20:517
    The poop on Lipps is that he's asking for ~$1 million/year.
    
    The guy's on the seriously downside of his career and will never get
    that kind of money, plus he's forever injured.
    
    JaKe
    
35.667CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinThu Sep 03 1992 20:524
Louis Lipps sink ships....


'Saw
35.668CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Sep 04 1992 13:215
Lipps sticks it to Steelers, Pouts away from team, Agent all puckered out.

Teammates say Lipps is all wet....

JD
35.669CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadFri Sep 04 1992 13:472
Lipps' contract would take a bite out of the Steelers payroll.  Although I've 
heard that he ia a fine chap, it seems to me that he is a sucker.
35.670ELMAGO::CGRIEGOFri Sep 04 1992 13:543
    The Steelers management is in the process of putting together a
    contract similar to the one that the Bears put together for the Fridge,
    it seems that they're afraid of having a fat Lipps.
35.671Steelers will please if you aren't expecting too muchSHALOT::MEDVIDthe same deep water as youFri Sep 04 1992 15:3325
    After reading the last pre-season issue of Steelers Digest, there is
    some optimism.  But hell, when your new punter is the brightest spot of
    the pre-season, you just gotta wonder.
    
    I think O'Donnell will be OK, but he really doesn't have any quality
    recievers that aren't tight ends.  Dwight Stone is great once he
    catches the ball, so I figure he'll be the primary target to be double
    teamed.
    
    Running game should be strong but not dominant.
    
    Offensive line should be better...how could they get worse?
    
    Defensive line and linebackers are essentially the same as last year
    which means Kosar and Moon will have ages to throw the ball.  Still
    tough against the run though.
    
    Defensive secondary is suspect after being the best in the league two
    years ago.
    
    This spells nothing more than a .500 season for the Steelers.  Anything
    better than 8-8 will be gravy.  But the sad thing is, with the current
    state of the AFC, 9-7 could put a team in the playoffs.
    
    	--dan'l
35.672PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineFri Sep 04 1992 22:405
    Only thing --dan'l, I don't think they'll reach 8-8 this year, I see
    6-10, or 7-9 as a probability, personally.
    
    JaKe
    
35.673SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Fri Sep 04 1992 22:526
    
    	Iffin they can survive the first 8 weeks of their schedule, they
    might end up 9-7.  But that first half is a real killer with most of
    the games away.
    
    
35.674Gotta gloat while we canPFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineTue Sep 08 1992 03:0556
        When the book is closed on the 1992 NFL season, this win in 
game one by the Steelers over the Oilers may be meaningless.  Right now,
though, it looks big, very big.  Gone are the days of the Emperor Chas.
Noll, his weak general Joe Walton, and all of the other staff that made 
the Steelers as predictable and horrendous as anyone could want.
        Here, now, is the beginning of the reign of Emperor wannabe, Bill
Cowher, and his offensive general Ron Erhardt.
        Mind you, that most of us here in Pittsburgh remember that one 
young coach with the last name of Noll took over a then horrendous Steeler        
team, and in his first regular season game, took that same team to win num-
ber one.  The team then proceeded to lose their next 13 games(in a 14 game
season), prompting many to believe that Noll was headed for the same 
unemployment line that the previous Steeler head coaches used.  Little
were we to know at that time the heights Noll would take that team to.
        I seriously doubt that this Steeler team will lose 15 games this
season, but I also seriously doubt that this team will be playing in any
playoff games this year, either.
        The game was exciting, with O'Donnell giving the Oilers some TD's,
Brister-style on fumbles.  Barry Foster running like his life depended on it,
and the inclusion of a FAKE PUNT, something that the emperor of late hardly
ever used.  
        But the best performance, for the Steelers, of the day was that of 
Oiler QB Warren Moon, who, at times, threw the most ill-advised, poorly 
poorly thrown balls, he's thrown since joining the NFL.  One of which came 
either late in the third qtr, or early in the 4th qtr(effects of beer on the 
memory), when the Oilers were driving for a TD which would have put firmly 
them in the lead, and good coverage by the Steeler secondary forced Moon to 
move outside of the poocket.  His pass protection then broke down, and Moon, 
under pressure, let lose a truly lame duck that Rod Woodson picked out of 
the air and returned 50+ yards.  Shortly thereafter, Neil O'Donnell threw a 
TD pass that put the Steelers up by a score of 29-24, and that's the way it
ended.
        Stat of the day, under QB stats:

                Warren Moon, Interceptions=5

        Cowher took the ceremonial dousing with Gatorade near the end of the 
and appeared very happy, getting his first NFL win.

Long Live The New Emperor.

BTW, I realize that in a few weeks, I may be crying, "Run the Bum out of Town"
but I realize that this season, in all likelyhood won't be a playoff year
for the Steelers and I have to enjoy these bright spots as they come.

I'll try and find a paper with the Stats from the game, but in the meantime,
if anybody has the stats, either team, individual, or both, would they please
enter them in here???

Thanks

JaKe



35.6755 INTs... that's the Moon we like ;-)HYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoTue Sep 08 1992 12:285
    
    
    Where's Midnight when we need him!     
    
    /Jeff
35.676A meaningful win made all the more meaningfulSHALOT::MEDVIDthe same deep water as youTue Sep 08 1992 16:2819
    It wasn't Moon's bad day.
    It wasn't Barry Foster's running.
    It wasn't Adrian Cooper's game-winning catch.
    It wasn't Jeff Grahm's consistent play.
    It wasn't Bill Cowher's new and exciting brand of football.
    It wasn't the Steelers' opportunistic secondary.
    It wasn't the good performance by Neil O'Donnell.

    No, folks, the highlight of Sunday for me was the phone ringing at 4:03
    and hearing my father's exuberant voice on the other end.  I haven't
    heard him this happy on a Sunday afternoon since January 1980.

    JaKe's right, Pittsburgh probably won't be in the playoffs, but this
    win was enough to make that man that I respect so dearly enjoy his
    Sunday afternoon for a change.  He bleeds black and gold and gave me
    that same blood.  It truly makes the season, no matter what happens the
    other 15 games.

    	--dan'l
35.677PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineTue Sep 08 1992 19:2837
    I agree with ya --dan'l, but for those that don't know what these
    statements equate to, here goes
    
    >>It wasn't Moon's bad day.
    Good stats for Moon, 'cept for the interception one, he was something
    like 28-45 for 330 yards, but those 5 INT's killed him/the oilers.
    
    >>It wasn't Barry Foster's running.
    About 24 carries for 109 yards(stats may be off slightly)
    
    >>It wasn't Adrian Cooper's game-winning catch.
    A nice one at that, IN TRAFFIC!!
    
    >>It wasn't Jeff Grahm's consistent play.
    7 catches for 89 yards
    
    >>It wasn't Bill Cowher's new and exciting brand of football.
    Exciting, I do agree.  Fake punts, decent blocking, not just the same
    old Steeler plays.
    
    >>It wasn't the Steelers' opportunistic secondary.
    5 ints, what else can be said.
    
    >>It wasn't the good performance by Neil O'Donnell.
    Brister has his unemployment papaer filled out already.  Not a great
    performance, but a good one.
    
    Bill Cowher, in his weekly press conference(which I only caught an
    excerpt from) praised his team, but said they will have a tough game
    Sunday against the Jests.  He called for lots of noise from the fans
    this coming Sunday, and he said that, since the game is at 4pm, the
    fans will have 3 extra hours to "prepare" to be extra noisy.
    
    Stats will be in here later tonite if time permits.
    
    JaKe
    
35.678SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Sep 08 1992 20:1527
    
    
    	To say that I was in shock on Sunday is a understatement.  For a
    young team, this first win away and against a superbowl possible is
    a fantastic motivator.  No one gave the Steelers much of a chance, but
    AGAIN they went to the 'Dome and pulled the great game out of their 
    hats.  
    
    	A couple of years ago, it was a wildcard win in Houston that sent
    them to Denver where they played their hearts out and the nation got
    to see Bubby's mom every 10 seconds.  Years ago during the dynasty, it
    was Bum and the 'ropes' and how the Oilers would destroy them.  Seems
    that the Steelers conked them something like 31-3.
    
    	I saw the fake punt on the highlights and it was beautiful. 
    Brought back bad memories of that fake punt in '72? against the
    Dolphins in the playoffs that preserved their perfect season.  Now, the
    shoes on the other foot!  Glad to see some changes in the offense.
    But, seeing all those fumbles again remined me of the Steelers of the
    last 8 years.  But where there is light, there is hope.
    
    	Let's hope they can make it two in a row!
    
    
    					pour on the Iron...
    
    
35.679PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemTue Sep 08 1992 20:2018
35.680PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemWed Sep 09 1992 00:5310
    Eric Green finally underwent an MRI today.  He was supposed to undergo
    one yesterday, but the scanner at the hospital he went to wasn't big
    enough to fit him in.
    
    Diagnosis is that Green has a bruised rotator cuff in his right
    shoulder, and is expected to be out about 3 weeks.
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.681STEELERS 1-0PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemWed Sep 09 1992 01:1058
    
STEELERS 		29
Oilers			24

		1	2	3	4		T
STEELERS	7	9	6	7		29
Oilers		14	10	0	0		24

Scoring Summary:
1st Quarter
Houston--Meads 15 yd fumble return (Del Greco PAT)
Houston--Givens 11 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS--Foster 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)

2nd Quarter
STEELERS--FG Anderson 30 yd
Houston-- FG Del Greco 36 yd
Steelers--Graham 20 yd pass from O'Donnell(PAT blocked)
Houston--Givens 8 yd pass from Moon(Del Greco PAT)

3rd Quarter
STEELERS--FG Anderson 25 yd
STEELERS--FG Anderson 37 yd

4th Quarter
Steelers--Cooper 9 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)

Team Stats:

STEELERS				HOUSTON
20		First Downs		23
34-136		Rushes/yds		14-104
245		Passing Yds		330
15-24-0		Comp-Att-Int		29-45-5
3-22		Sacked/yds lost		0-0
2-51		Punts			2-48
2-2		Fumbles-lost		0-0
7-69		Penalties-yards		7-61
32:41		Time of Possession	27:19

Individual Stats:
Rushing:
STEELERS:  Foster 26-107, STone 2-26, Hoge 3-8, O'Donnell 3-(-5).
Houston:   White 13-100, Givens 1-4

Passing:   
STEELERS:  O'Donnell 14-23-0, 223 yards, Royals 1-1-0, 44 yards.
Houston:   Moon 29-45-5, 330 yds.

Receiving:
STEELERS:  Graham 7-89 yds, Stone 2-80 yds, Foster 2-26 yds, Hoge 2-19 yds, 
	   W. Williams 1-44 yds, Cooper 1-9 yds.
Houston:   Duncan 8-98 yds, Jeffires 7-117 yds, L.Harris 7-49 yds, Givens 4-42
	   yds, White 3-24 yds.

JaKe


35.682one down , fifteen more to goMKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Wed Sep 09 1992 11:4624
First off, thanks a bunch for the stats, JaKe.

A few things that I am concerned about though,

>>        STEELERS				HOUSTON  
>>        3-22		Sacked/yds lost	        0-0

These are the two biggest weaknesses from last year, poor pass protection
and poor pass rush.  I had hoped they would have made some improvements.

>>Steelers--Graham 20 yd pass from O'Donnell(PAT blocked)
                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^
How long has it been since this has happened?  IMHO Anderson has been the most
consistant kicker I've seen in black and gold.  I can only hope that this was a
blown blocking assignment at the line and not a sign of things to follow.

Did Green get hurt in the game or has this been something that happened 
earlier this spring?  I don't remember hearing anything about it up here
in Cow Hampshire.

This sure was a sweet one, regardless of how it was played.  Especially
coming out of the "House with no brains".  ;^)

Bill
35.683SHALOT::MEDVIDthe same deep water as youWed Sep 09 1992 13:3432
>These are the two biggest weaknesses from last year, poor pass protection
>and poor pass rush.  I had hoped they would have made some improvements.
    
    There was no pass rush at all for the Steelers unless they blitzed from
    the secondary.  Linebackers need fresh blood.
    
    The pass protection wasn't too bad and O'Donnell made the best of the
    time he had.  Lots of penalties on the O-line.  Especially Duvall Love
    who Pittsburgh got from the Rams.  But love was up against Ray Childres
    and that's usually a problem for any mediocre lineman.  Camera did
    catch a shot of Cowher bitching at Love after a holding call.
    
    Cowher also was shown chewing out a rookie LB after a kickoff.  The kid
    was getting into a shouting/shoving match and Cowher got on his butt. 
    These guys are going to behave or else.  
    
>How long has it been since this has happened?  IMHO Anderson has been the most
>consistant kicker I've seen in black and gold.  I can only hope that this was a
>blown blocking assignment at the line and not a sign of things to follow.
    
    Again, I think this was Love vs Childres and you know who won.
    
>Did Green get hurt in the game or has this been something that happened 
>earlier this spring?  
    
    Green got hurt the first play of the game.  Never showed what happened. 
    The frightening thing (for opponents) is that Adrian Cooper is just as
    big and just as good.  Cooper filled Keith Jackson's place at OU when
    Jackson graduated.  Good stock.
    
    	--dan'l
    
35.684MKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Wed Sep 09 1992 16:0216
    
 >>   Cowher also was shown chewing out a rookie LB after a kickoff.  The kid
 >>   was getting into a shouting/shoving match and Cowher got on his butt. 
 >>   These guys are going to behave or else.  
 
	This reminds me of another first year head coach that I saw on the 
	sidelines at Pitt Stadium in 1969 (or was it 1968).  Considering 
	the latter's accomplishments, I'd say Cowher is on the right track.
	Time will tell.

	By the way, is Joe Green still involved with coaching staff?  Last I
	heard he was working with the defensive line, but that was admittedly
	a few years ago.


	Bill
35.685FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 09 1992 16:344
    When Noll retired after last season most of the coaching staff left. 
    Joe Greene is now the Defensive Line coach for the Dolphins.
    
    John
35.686SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Sep 09 1992 16:3427
    
    re: Joe Greene
    
    	Joe has moved on to help with the Dolphins.
    
    re: Jake
    
    	Nope, the game with the Oilers was in the dome and was during the
    '70's.  If I'm not mistaken, it was a Monday night game too.  This was
    before the Houston Oiler fightsong came out and all that Luv ya blue 
    junk.  Anyway, the 'dome decided to give out all these little ropes in
    hoping that the Oilers could rope, err hog tie the Steelers.  
    
    	Away from home, the Oilers stunk.  And yep, those were some great
    games at 3 Rivers involving the Oilers.  Two great teams fighting it 
    out.  Never forget the way Joe and Co. completely shut down Earl too.
    And if memory serves me correctly, it was during those games that
    wearing the 'glove' became fashionable in the NFL.  Up to that time,
    it was stick'em galore but no gloves.  Then Swann decided to wear a
    skindivers glove since the temp was so cold and rainy.  Seems that the
    gloves gave not only warmth and dry hands, but the rubber outers helped
    them hold onto the ball a little better... and as you say, the rest is
    history.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
35.687re: Joe GreenMKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Wed Sep 09 1992 16:477
	Joe Green coaching with the phins????

	I guess he doesn't mind waiting a REAL long time for that fifth ring.;^)


	Bill
35.688Green out 3 gamesLJOHUB::MFFL::StraubKramer for PresidentWed Sep 09 1992 18:196
Re. Eric Green

The SPORTS_91 notesfile says that he underwent an MRI on his shoulder 
which hurt in the game and is expected to miss 3 games.

Dave
35.689ah's confusedCTHQ1::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Sep 09 1992 18:217
    -1,
    Wait a sec, this IS the SPORTS notesfile, n'est-ce-pas?
    I didn't miss a synapse again, did I?
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
35.690Same conference.. different replyLJOHUB::MFFL::StraubKramer for PresidentWed Sep 09 1992 18:2727
Re. -1, and -2

Oops... you're right.  This is SPORTS_91... the note is #.680...  Long
day, sorry.  - Dave 

             <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
              -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
============================================================================
===
Note: 35.680                     PITTSBURGH STEELERS                680 of 
682
PFSVAX::JACOB "Carp Per Diem"                       10 lines   8-SEP-1992 
20:53
                                     -<  >-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
    Eric Green finally underwent an MRI today.  He was supposed to undergo
    one yesterday, but the scanner at the hospital he went to wasn't big
    enough to fit him in.
 
    Diagnosis is that Green has a bruised rotator cuff in his right
    shoulder, and is expected to be out about 3 weeks.
 
    JaKe
 
 

35.691CSOA1::JACOBGetting older by the minuteWed Sep 09 1992 19:547
    Green did injure the shoulder on the first play of the game, but it is
    being reported that the initial injury actually happened a couple of
    weeks ago but Green never rested with the injury.  Cowher has said the
    Green will rest for the nexted 2-3 weeks while the injury heals.
    
    JaKe
    
35.692ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Thu Sep 10 1992 00:542
    Did Meads score on an O'Donnell fumble?
    
35.693PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemThu Sep 10 1992 02:105
    Yeah, O'Donnell was hit and fumbled and he picked it up and waltzed
    into the end zone for the TD.
    
    JaKe
    
35.694PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemMon Sep 14 1992 12:1719
    Barry Foster runs wild, the Steelers again play opportunistic defense,
    and they win, 27-10 over the now lowly Jests.  The Steelers are now
    2-0.
    
    Foster carried the ball 33 times for 190 yards, and now has 297 yards
    on the season.
    
    I only got to listen to bits and pieces of the game, cause WCBS out of
    NY kept fading in and out on the car radio on the drive up here, but
    the Steeler defense carried the team, IMHO, while the offense tried to
    give it away at times thru turnovers.  FOster, while running up the
    yardage, also fumbled the ball three times.
    
    This team has suprized me in the firsted two games.  
    
    GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.695Proud to be a Steelers fan once againSHALOT::MEDVIDthe same deep water as youMon Sep 14 1992 14:5534
    The Steelers didn't look like world beaters yesterday, but they played
    good ball.  Pittsburgh will be roughed up by the better NFL teams.
    
    Bright spot was Barry Foster, he who would only gain about 20-30 yards
    per game in the Joe Walton offense.  Foster averaged over 6 yards per
    carry, that stat helped by a beautiful 54 yard TD run.  Steelers are
    2-0 and Foster has 100+ yards in both games...see any correlation?
    
    O'Donnell made some really pretty passes, especially in crucial third
    down situations.  And a beautiful hail Mary that gave the Steelers a
    boost before halftime.  Noll would have run out the clock.  Instead,
    Steelers went into the locker room tied rather than 3 points down.
    
    Jeff Grahm is finally coming around and was on the receiving end of a
    few of those nicer O'Donnell passes.
    
    The only points NY scored were due to Steelers mistakes, a fumble in
    their own end and a fluke interception for a TD.
    
    Steelers secondary was in high gear, especially David...excuse me...
    D.J. Johnson (changed the name in the off season).
    
    Still no pass rush.  Tunch Ilkin went down so that could hurt the
    already weak O-line...although O'Donnell and Foster didn't seem to be
    having too much trouble.
    
    But the best thing about this team is their discipline.  There are no
    more Keith Gary/Keith Willis type unsportsmanlike conduct calls.  No
    more jumping offside in 3rd and short.  Very few false starts.  The
    team appears to be well coached.
    
    I like Bill Cowher and I like this team.
    
    	--dan'l
35.696Steelers 2-0PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemMon Sep 14 1992 16:2944
		1	2	3	4		T
Jets		3	7	0	0		10
STEELERS	0	10	0	17		27

Scoring Summary
NY--	Fg Staurovsky 32 yd
STEELERS--Foster 23 yd run(Anderson PAT)
NY--Brim 77 yd interception return(Staurovsky PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 28 yd FG
STEELERS--Foster 54 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 35 yd FG
STEELERS--Griffin 65 yd interception return(Anderson PAT)
Att--56050

TEAM STATS:

Jets						STEELERS
12			1st downs		17
22-110			Rushes-Yds		45-215
129			Passing Yds		155
10-33-4			Comp-Att-Int		11-22-2
1-5			Sacked-yds lost		5-30
5-38			Punts			5-36
3-3			Fumbles-lost		3-3
7-52			Penalties-yds		3-20
22:42			Time of Poss.		37:18

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
Jets--Thomas 10-49, Baxter 6-43, McNeil 4-28, Nagle 2-(-10)
STEELERS--Foster 33-190, Hoge 8-29, Thompson 1-1, O'Donnell 3-(-5)

PASSING
Jets--Nagle 9-29-1 117 yds, O'Brien 1-4-3 17 yds
STEELERS--O'Donnell 11-22-2 185 yds

RECEIVING:
Jets--Moore 3-50, C.Burkett 3-32, Toon 2-31, McNeil 2-21.
STEELERS--Graham 6-146, Hoge 2-13, Cooper 1-14, Mills 1-12, Foster 1-0


JaKe

35.697Steelers 2-0, Chargers nexted weekPFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemMon Sep 14 1992 16:5946
Here's the UNOFFICIAL cumulative Stats for the Steelers so far.
    

Scoring by Quarter
		                                        
		1	2	3	4		T 

STEELERS	7	19	6	24		56
Opponent	17	17	0	0		34

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD		FG		PAT	Total
Anderson	0		5	        5	20
Foster		3		0		0	18
Graham		1		0		0	 6
Cooper		1		0		0	 6
Griffin		1		0		0	 6

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
		Rushes		Yards
Foster 		 59		297  
Hoge	  	 11		 37  
Stone	          2		 26  
THompson	  1		  1  
O'Donnell	  6		(-10)

PASSING:
		Att	Compl	Int		Yds	TD
O'Donnell 	45	25	2		408	2
Royals 		 1	 1	0		 44	0
	
RECEIVING:
        	No.	Yds
Graham 		13	235
Hoge 		 4	 32
Foster 		 3	 26
Stone 		 2	 80
Cooper 		 2	 23
W. Williams 	 1	 44
Mills		 1	 12


JaKe


35.698PFSVAX::JACOBAnybody got some aspirin????Mon Sep 21 1992 12:1013
    Neil O'Donnell threw for 2 TD's and ran for another as the Steelers
    beat the Chargers, 23-6.
    
    The Steelers are 3-0 for the firsted time since 1979, and we all know
    how far they went that year.
    
    Still waiting for the Steelers to be tested to find out what they're
    really made of, though.
    
    Cowher is the first Steeler rookie head coach to go 3-0.
    
    JaKe
    
35.699Steelers 3-0PFSVAX::JACOBAnybody got some aspirin????Mon Sep 21 1992 12:2144
		1	2	3	4	T
STEELERS	0	7	0	16	23
Chargers	3	3	0	0	6

SCORING SUMMARY
Chargers--Carney 24 yd FG
STEELERS--Cooper 24 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Chargers--Carney 43 yd FG
STEELERS--Stone 6 yd pass from O'Donnell(PAT failed)
STEELERS--O'Donnell 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 42 yd FG

TEAM STATS:
STEELERS					Chargers
16		1st downs			16
33-67		Rushes-yds			24-109
205		Passing yds			221
17-24-1		Comp-Att-int			16-36-3
1-10		Sacked-yds lost			1-8
6-37		Punts	    			6-45
2-2		Fumbles-lost    		0-0
9-57		Penalties-yds			10-95
32:56		Time of Possession		27:04

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 21-36, Hoge 8-34, O'Donnell 4-(-3)
Chargers--Bernstine 11-65, Butts 9-23, Harmon 3-17, Humphries 1-4

PASSING--
STEELERS--17-24-1 215 yds
Chargers--Humphries 13-29-2 151 yds, Gagliano 3-7-1 78 yds

RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Stone 5-69, Graham 3-67, Cooper 3-36, Hoge 2-23, Mills 1-14, Thompson
1-7, Foster 1-(-1).
Chargers--Jefferson 4-45, Harmon 3-77, Lewis 3-36, Walker 3-15, Miller 2-49,
Bernstine 1-7


JaKe


35.700Green update!JURAN::WESTMon Sep 21 1992 14:258
    
    
    Does anyone know when the Steelers are expecting the return of Eric
    Green? At first he was out 2-3 weeks now I hear 6 weeks (3 more weeks)
    can someone give me an update, my Fantasy football team could use him
    with the bye weeks coming up....thanks
    
    kevin
35.701PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Sep 21 1992 15:234
  The most impressive stat for the Steeler's so far this year is that
  0 points have been scored against them in the 2nd half.

	Keith
35.702PFSVAX::JACOBAnybody got some aspirin????Mon Sep 21 1992 16:094
    The Steelers lead the league(so far) with 12 interceptions in 3 games.
    
    JaKe
    
35.703thrown to or caught from? <he he he ;*)>CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeMon Sep 21 1992 16:351
    
35.704PFSVAX::JACOBU S 1992 Rodeo Sex ChampionMon Sep 21 1992 16:434
    Ok, Kev, The Steelers have INTERCEPTED 12 passes.
    
    JaKe
    
35.705STEELERS UNOFFICIAL Offensive statsPFSVAX::JACOBU S 1992 Rodeo Sex ChampionMon Sep 21 1992 18:2347

Scoring by Quarter
		                                        
		1	2	3	4		T 

STEELERS	7	26	6	40		79
Opponent	20	20	0	0		40

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD		FG		PAT	Total
Anderson	0		6	        7	25
Foster		3		0		0	18
Cooper		2		0		0	12
Graham		1		0		0	 6
Griffin		1		0		0	 6
O'Donnell	1		0		0	 6
Stone		1		0		0	 6

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
		Rushes		Yards		Avg
Foster 		 80		333		4.16  
Hoge	  	 19		 71		3.73  
Stone	          2		 26 	       13.00 
THompson	  1		  1             1.00
O'Donnell	 10		(-13)         (-1.30)

PASSING:
		Att	Compl	Int		Yds	TD
O'Donnell 	69	42	3		623	4
Royals 		 1	 1	0		 44	0
	
RECEIVING:
        	No.	Yds	Avg.
Graham 		16	302 	18.9
Stone 		 7	149	21.3
Hoge 		 6	 55	 9.2
Cooper 		 5	 59	11.8
Foster 		 4	 25	 6.3
Mills		 2	 26	13.0
W. Williams 	 1	 44     44.0
Thompson	 1	  7	 7.0


JaKe

35.706PFSVAX::JACOBFifty-Seven brain cells &amp; nuthin onWed Sep 23 1992 14:3312
    re somewhere in this conference, where it was stated that the Steelers
    have been underdogs all 3 games and won all three:
    
    This week, they're favored by 3.5 over the Meat Packers from Wisconson.
    
    Now, dammit, why do they have to go and favor the Steelers???
    
    Now they'll probably lose, cause they're supposed to win.  I say just
    make them the underdogs EVERY game, and don't jinx them.
    
    JaKe
    
35.707"favored" Steelers drop one to Green BayMKFSA::LONGso many braincells so little timeMon Sep 28 1992 11:1416
>>    re somewhere in this conference, where it was stated that the Steelers
>>    have been underdogs all 3 games and won all three:
    
>>    This week, they're favored by 3.5 over the Meat Packers from Wisconson.
    
>>    Now, dammit, why do they have to go and favor the Steelers???
    
>>    Now they'll probably lose, cause they're supposed to win.  I say just
>>    make them the underdogs EVERY game, and don't jinx them.
    
>>    JaKe
 

	Nice going, Karnak!

	Bill
35.708PFSVAX::JACOBA Rodeo-Sex Weekend was Great!!Mon Sep 28 1992 19:3419
    
    >>	Nice going, Karnak!

    >>	Bill
    
    Just had that feeling, whaddid I tell ya in the terminal room lasted
    week.
    
    Rod Woodson left his brain in Pittsburgh, had one HORRIBLE game, burnt
    TWICE for TD passes, and dove for a muffed punt and lost it, then on
    the nexted play he got burnt for one of his 2 TD's he gave up. 
    
    The defense wasn't TOO bad, but the offense reminded me terribly of
    lasted years.
    
    Stats later 2nite or tomorrow night depending on workload.
    
    JaKe
    
35.709STEELERS are now 3-1PFSVAX::JACOBAnd Nirvana can fly outta my buttTue Sep 29 1992 14:3345

SCORING SUMMARY:

                1       2       3       4       T
STEELERS        3       0       0       0       3
Green Bay       0       10      0       7       17

STEELERS--Anderson 35 yd FG
Packers--Jacke 47 yd FG
Packers--Sharpe, 76 yd pass from Favre(Jacke PAT)
Packers--Brooks, 8 yd pass from Favre(Jacke PAT)

TEAM STATS:

STEELERS                                        Green Bay
16                      First Downs             16
18-145                  Rushes-Yds              38-99
208                     Passing Yds             195
16-41-0                 Comp-Att-Int            14-19-0
2-16                    Sacked-Yds Lost         2-15
5-40                    Punts                   5-39
2-1                     Fumbles-Lost            2-0
4-35                    Penalties-Yds           6-41
22:25                   Time of Possession      37:35

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
Rushing:
STEELERS: Foster 12-117, Hoge 3-18, Stone 1-5, O'Donnell 1-5, Thompson 1-0. 
Green Bay: Workman 26-85, Favre 4-12, E.Bennett 2-5, McGee 4-4, Sydney 1-3,
           Sharpe 1-(-10).

Passing:
STEELERS:  O'Donnell 16-41-0 224 yds
Green Bay:  Favre 14-19-0, 210 yds

Receiving:
STEELER:  Stone 5-101, Graham 3-32, Hoge 3-29, Mills 2-24, Cooper 1-17, 
          Davenport 1-13, Jorden 1-8.
Green Bay:  Workman 4-20, McGee 3-28, Sharpe 2-93, Harris 2-23, Taylor 1-28
          Sydney 1-10, Brooks 1-8.


JaKe

35.710STEELERS UNOFFICIAL cumulative statsPFSVAX::JACOBWhere the Hell am I??Tue Sep 29 1992 15:0449

Scoring by Quarter
							
		1       2       3       4               T 

STEELERS        10      26      6       40              82
Opponent        20      30      0       7               57

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               7               7       28
Foster          3               0               0       18
Cooper          2               0               0       12
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Stone           1               0               0        6

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster           92             450             4.89  
Hoge             22              89             4.05  
Stone             3              31            10.33 
THompson          2               1             0.50
O'Donnell        11             (-8)          (-0.73)

PASSING:
		Att     Compl   Int             Yds     TD
O'Donnell       110      58      3               847     4
Royals            1       1      0                44     0
	
RECEIVING:
		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          19      334     17.6
Stone           12      250     20.8
Hoge             9       84      9.3
Cooper           6       76     12.7
Foster           4       25      6.3
Mills            4       50     12.5
W. Williams      1       44     44.0
Davenport        1       13     13.0
Jorden           1        8      8.0
Thompson         1        7      7.0



JaKe
35.711MKFSA::LONGBucs = NL East Champs x 3Tue Sep 29 1992 16:095
	I think that makes four 100+ yard games for Foster. Watching the game
	two weeks ago I was really impressed with this guy's accelleration 
	into, and through, the line.

	Bill
35.712PFSVAX::JACOBWhere the Hell am I??Tue Sep 29 1992 17:175
    Actually, Bill, Foster has 3 100+ yd games, and one where he only
    gained about 29 yards.
    
    JaKe
    
35.713PFSVAX::JACOBWhere the Hell am I??Tue Sep 29 1992 18:418
    OK, Bill, in the San Diego game, Foster was held to 36 yards on 21
    carries.
    
    Sunday, most of his yardage came on the 74 yard run.  Other than that,
    he was something like 11 carries, 43 yards, or thereabouts.
    
    JaKe
    
35.714PFSVAX::JACOBWhere the Hell am I??Tue Oct 06 1992 23:2112
    Damn, Damn, Damn
    
    The Steelers are FAVORED again against the freakin' Brown(spot)s(tm).
    
    Now since Cowher took over, they've won the 3 games they were underdogs
    in, and lost the only game they were favored in.  Wish they were
    underdogs, cause making them favorites sorta jinxes them.
    
    A buncha crappola
    
    JaKe
    
35.715ROULET::WHITEHAIRWed Oct 07 1992 11:4412
    
    	Don't worry Mr. Fake,
    
    		The Squeelers will be under the Dawg on Monday because
    	the Dawgs are gona kick some butt.  Look for the Squeelers to
    	turn the ball over at least 4 times in the game.
    
    		Mack is Back!
    
    	WOOF!
    
    
35.716Conspiracy by the bookiesSALES::THILLWed Oct 07 1992 15:495
    Yabbut, favorite/underdog ratings have notheing to do with the relative
    strenght of the teams. It only is there to try to make sure +/- the
    same amount of money is bet on both teams.
    
    Tom 
35.717USCTR1::NAHEARNFri Oct 09 1992 18:3211
    Mack is back.................and wearing lots of extra equipment!!!!!!
    
    :^)
    
    
    Hal Tried Hallucinogens (TM),
    
    
    Nelly
    
    
35.718Steelers now 3-2PFSVAX::JACOBAnd I fall down 3 times a dayMon Oct 12 1992 03:4327
        What an exercise in mediocrity the Steelers and the Brown(spot)s(tm)
put on in the Mistake by the Lake today.

        Gary Anderson hits the top of the upright on one of his field goal
attempts, and turnovers and the inability to punch the ball in and stupid
turnovers sealed the coffin on the Steelers second loss in a row, and their
tenth loss in Clevescum Stadium in their lasted 11 games there.

        Early in the game, the crap they tried to pass off as turf started
to gurgle, buble and surge, leaving ruts in the field up to 6 inches deep.
Neil O'Donnell played a decent game, Barry Foster showed signs of bright-
ness, and signs of frustration.  The Steelers got caught in a confused 
state and Tomczak caught them and burned them for a long TD pass.  Eric
Metcalf hurt them, as he has hurt other temas this year, with his running.

        One stat that showed how the Brown(spot)s(tm) defense was bottling
the Steelers receivers was a stat they showed midway thru the 2nd Qtr,
that stat was that Foster, receiving, had 5 catches for 40 yards, a lot of
throws to a back that early in the game, eh??

        The defense again appeared porous when they needed to suck it up and
keep the 'Spots offense out of the end zone.

        The Steelers offense has not scored a touchdown in over 8 quarters.

JaKe

35.719Browns win BIG GAME!LUDWIG::WHITEHAIRMon Oct 12 1992 13:369
    
    	To put it simple Mr. Fake,
    		
    		The Squeelers rust up in the 2nd half as the "Thriller"
    	does the moon walk and Mack goes on the attack!
    
    
    		WOOF!
    
35.720TORREY::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownMon Oct 12 1992 15:214
    
    At least Jake was man enough to show up!
    
    FOOW!
35.721Steelers 3-2 & in need of a lot of workPFSVAX::JACOBAnd I fall down 3 times a dayTue Oct 13 1992 01:0647
SCORING SUMMARY:

		1	2	3	4	T
STEELERS	3	3	0	3	9
Brown(spot)s(tm)0	3	7	7	17

STEELERS--FG Anderson 25 yds
STEELERS--FG Anderson 36 yds
'Spots--FG Stover 51 yds
'Spots--Mack 1 yd run(Stover PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson 40 yds
'Spots--Jackson 47 yd pass from Tomczak(Stover PAT)

Team Stats:

STEELERS					'Spots
20			first downs		12
30-122			rushes-yds		27-85
228			passing yds		168
25-32-0			Compl-Att-Int		10-17-0
2-13			Sacked-yds lost		1-3
3-41			Punts			4-42
6-54			Penalties		8-67
2-1			Fumbles-lost		1-1
34:47			Time of Possession	25:13

Individual Stats:
Rushing:
STEELERS:Foster 24-84, Stone 1-17, Hoge 3-12, O'Donnell 2-9
'Spots:  Metcalf 7-49, Mack 12-32, Vardell 3-7, Tomczak 5-(-3)

Passing:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 25-32-0, 241 yards
'Spots:  Tomczak 10-17-0-1TD, 171 yards

Receiving:

STEELERS: Graham 8-87, Foster 6-49, Green 3-36, Stone 3-31, Mills 2-21, Hoge
	  2-9, Cooper 1-8.
'Spots:   Metcalf 3-48, Jackson 2-62, Smith 2-21, Bavaro 1-23, Mack 1-9,
	  McCardell 1-8.

Nexted week, The Bungholes on Monday MINUS Boomer Esiason.

JaKe


35.722STEELERS Unofficial stats thru 5 games(3-2)PFSVAX::JACOBAnd I fall down 3 times a dayTue Oct 13 1992 01:1950

Scoring by Quarter
							
		1       2       3       4               T 

STEELERS        13      29      6       43              91
Opponent        20      33      7       14              74

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               10              7       37
Foster          3               0               0       18
Cooper          2               0               0       12
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Stone           1               0               0        6

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          116             534             4.60
Hoge             25             101             4.04
Stone             4              48            12.00
THompson          2               1             0.50
O'Donnell        13               1             0.77

PASSING:
		Att     Compl   Int             Yds     TD
O'Donnell       142      83      3              1088     4
Royals            1       1      0                44     0
	
RECEIVING:
		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          27      421     15.6
Stone           15      281     18.7
Hoge            11      113     10.3
Foster          10       74      7.4
Cooper           7       84     12.0
Mills            6       71     11.8
E.Green		 3	 36	12.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0
Davenport        1       13     13.0
Jorden           1        8      8.0
Thompson         1        7      7.0



JaKe
35.723PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Tue Oct 20 1992 03:089
    Steelers beat the Bungholes, 20-0.
    
    Foster ran for ~ 108 yds, O'Donnell 22-36, no ints, don't know the
    yardage.
    
    Stats in here tomorrow given the chance.
    
    JaKe
    
35.724PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Tue Oct 20 1992 03:124
    Anybody know what time the Steeler game is nexted week at KC?????
    
    JaKe
    
35.725TNTLJOHUB::MFFL::Straub...salsa, selzer...Tue Oct 20 1992 11:405
Re. -1

I believe the Steelers-Chiefs game is the Sunday night, 8:00 eastern time.

Dave
35.726yupCNTROL::CHILDSU.S. Tech found in IRAN! Bad GeorgeTue Oct 20 1992 12:458
                                    -< TNT >-

Re. -1

I believe the Steelers-Chiefs game is the Sunday night, 8:00 eastern time.

Dave

35.727HYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoTue Oct 20 1992 14:067
    
    
    That's kinda strange having back to back night games..   
    
    Should make for fun watching tho.  
    
    /Jeff
35.728not often I'll pull for the SqueelersQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 20 1992 17:293
    Go Squeelers !!!  Slap KC
    
    BG
35.729PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Tue Oct 20 1992 18:267
    Found a schedule today and the TNT Sunday night game at Kc is starting
    at 7:30.
    
    Thanks to those that replied.
    
    JaKe
    
35.730CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 20 1992 18:297
Perhaps this belongs in the question note, but why, all of a sudden,
are the TNT games starting at 7:30?

Earlier this season they were starting at 8pm?


'SAw
35.731PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 20 1992 18:331
    Daylight savings time?
35.732GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseTue Oct 20 1992 19:147
    re: 7:30 pm start
    
    It's to try to get a lead in crowd interested in the game so they won't
    switch to a LCS game or game 7 of the World Series.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
35.733CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 20 1992 19:247
>    It's to try to get a lead in crowd interested in the game so they won't
>    switch to a LCS game or game 7 of the World Series.
>    
\

Oh......    

35.734no problem JaKeQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Oct 20 1992 20:094
    Well,  it won't work this week...  KC will have the game all but won
    in the first quarter...  ;^)
    
    Bg
35.735STEELERS now 4-2, tied for AFC Central leadPFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Tue Oct 20 1992 22:5039
		1	2	3	4	T
Cincy		0	0	0	0	0
STEELERS	3	7	0	10	20

SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Anderson, 21 yd FG
STEELERS--Stone, 24 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Stone, 5 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson, 27 yd FG

TEAM STATS:
Cincy						STEELERS
6			First Downs		26
19-48			Rushes-Yds		37-173
11-24-0			Compl-Att-Int		23-37-0
70			Passing Yds		251
3-16			Sacked-Yds lost		4-36
8-47			Punts			5-44
8-49			Penalties-Yds		3-20
21:25			Time of Possession	38:25

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
Rushing:
Cincy--H.Green 12-45, Fenner 6-4, Esiason 1-(-1)
STEELERS--Foster 24-108, L. Thompson 8-33, Stone 2-25, Hoge 1-7, W.Williams 2-0

PASSING:
Cincy:  Esiason 11-22-0, 86 yds, Hollas 0-2-0
STEELERS--O'Donnell 23-37-0, 2 TD's, 287 yds

RECEIVING:
Cincy--McGee 3-33, H.Green 3-8, Pickens 2-25, Brennan 2-14, C.Thompson 1-6.
STEELERS--Graham 7-115, Stone 6-58, Mills 3-52, L.Thompson 2-25, Hoge 2-8, 
	  Foster 1-21, Jorden 1-6, E.Green 1-2.


JaKe

35.736STEELERS UNOFFICIAL STATS thru 6 gamesPFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Tue Oct 20 1992 23:0752

Scoring by Quarter
							
		1       2       3       4               T 

STEELERS        16      36      6       53              111
Opponent        20      33      7       14              74

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               12              9       45
Foster          3               0               0       18
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          2               0               0       12
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          140             642             4.59
Hoge             26             108             4.15
Stone             6              73            12.01
THompson         10              34             3.40
O'Donnell        13               1             0.77
W.Williams	  2		  0		0.00


PASSING:
		Att     Compl   Int    Comp %         Yds     TD
O'Donnell       179      106     3     59.2           1375     6
Royals            1       1      0    100.0             44     0
	
RECEIVING:
		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          34      536     15.8
Stone           21      339     16.1
Hoge            13      121      9.3
Foster          11       95      8.6
Mills            9      123     13.7
Cooper           7       84     12.0
E.Green		 4	 38	 9.5
Thompson         3       32     10.3
Jorden           2       14      7.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0
Davenport        1       13     13.0



JaKe
35.737Pit could be tough before the 21st centuryQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 21 1992 13:466
    Man Cincy is really bad...  Too bad I'm afraid to beat the
    Clowns even once.   Clevescum may make 8-8 after all.
    
    BG
    
    FWIW  O'Donnell look like he's gonna be real good real soon !!
35.738CSC32::M_MACGREGORThu Oct 22 1992 16:179
    			1	2	3	4
    STEELERS		xx	xx	6	xx
    Oppenents		xx	xx	7	xx
    
    Guess this means that when half-time comes, you can go mow the
    lawn or clean the car, then come back for the 4th, cause the
    third ain't worth watching if you enjoy points 8^)
    
    
35.739STEELERS win 27-3, now 5-2, No TDS lasted 2 gmsPFSVAX::JACOBMets in '93Mon Oct 26 1992 04:0630
        It was the first meeting of new Head Coach Bill Cowher against his
former boss Marty Schottenheimer and the KC Chiefs.
        The guys in black and gold did a lot tonite to gain some respect.
In beating the Chiefs, 27-3, they went over the first of many hurdles and
now remain tied with the Oilscum for the AFC Central lead with a 5-2 
record.  
        The defense was the real story tonight, intercepting Dave Krieg
2 times(or was it 3), and stuffing the Chiefs running AND passing attacks.  
        On the offense's side of the field, Barry Foster ran for ~105 yards
and ran for a TD while regaining the lead among NFL rushers, as Emmit SMith
had temporarily taken the lead earlier in the day.  Neil O'Donnell, while not
at top form, played formidably, completing passes important to keeping some
drives going, and completing one TD pass to Eric Green.  O'Donnell was not
intercepted in the game, leaving him with 7 TD passes, while only having an
AFC low 3 interceptions.
        Rod Woodson's 80 yd punt return for a TD was a work of art, and the 
game was never really close from there.  Gary Anderson added 49 yd and 30
yard field goals in the first half for the Steelers first half 13 points.
Eddie Murray, subbing for injured KC Chiefs kicker Nick Lowery(who is psycho,
BTW), got the only points on the board with a 52 yard FG that barely made it.
Woodson also had 4 solo tackles.
        Next week the Oilscum come into 3 Rivers for what will be a TOUGH
    divisional matchup. Actually, the nexted 3 weeks are tough for the
    Steelers, facing the Oilscum here, the Bills in Buffalo, and then the
    Lions here in Pittsburgh.

On cloud nine

JaKe

35.740CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 26 1992 12:2613
The thing that impressed me a lot was how INTENSE Cowher is.

Every time a squad came off he'd be pumping them up.

I'll tell you the team looked impressive last night.  If this keeps up,
the team will be going places.


btw, I like they guy they got playing Nose Tackle.  A guy after me own
heart.....


'Saw
35.741NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 26 1992 14:109
    
    Yes, the Steelers are now looking like they are *not* just another .500
    team playing over their heads for a few games.  One of the two Steelers'
    games I've gotten to see was the Browns game when I was in Pittsburgh,
    and I didn't think much of them.  It's beginning to look as if that
    game was the exception...
    
    glenn
     
35.742DEFENSE DEFENSEPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Oct 26 1992 15:3817
  This is two games in a row where the Steeler's looked dominating. You
  couldn't read too much out of the Cincy game since the Bengals are a
  a very weak team but their victory over a very good Chief team in 
  Arrowhead Stadium has to turn a few heads. I always felt the Steelers
  had a good defense the last few years but under J e Walt n, their offense
  always went 3 downs and out. That put too much pressure on the defense
  and sooner or later, some cracks started to appear. Now that they have
  Cowher and a new offensive coordinator who knows how the use the talent
  available, the offense is playing respectable football and making the
  other team work. Thus, when the defense gets on the field, they are rested
  and look awesome.

  Can't wait to hear the cries of DEFENSE, DEFENSE again in 3 rivers stadium.
  The place will be rockin next weekend when the Houscum Oinklers slip into 
  town.

	Keith
35.743CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 26 1992 16:088
If you look at the Giants offense in the Super Bowl years, that is what
Pittsburgh is trying to accomplish.  Looks like they have the running
backs for it....

And man, what a secondary!


'Saw
35.744QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 26 1992 19:295
    
    Squeelers looking tough...  Guess I'll be a fan again this week
    against the Soilers.
    
    BG
35.745CSOA1::JACOBMets in '93Mon Oct 26 1992 19:4019
    I think the reason for the resurgence in the Steelers is the different
    coaching styles of Bill Cowher and his predecessor, Chuck Noll.  Noll
    had become complacent in his OLD age, and his practices were no longer
    tight and structured.  The discipline wasn't there either.
    
    Let anybody pull what the Bunghole player pulled on Shula during the
    game lasted Monday night, and they'd be outta here before the clock
    struck midnight.
    
    Seem some Bunghole player had f__ked up bigtime during a play, and when
    he left the field, SHula started giving him the what for, and the guy
    reached up, flicked off Shula's hat, and walked away.  They say Shula
    wasn't happy, but also didn't discipline the guy by what I heard.
    
    Cowher woulda probably put the guy in orbit, cause you let one guy walk
    on ya like that, and others will try, too.
    
    JaKe
    
35.746STEELERS now 5-2, Houston Nexted week in 3RiversCSOA1::JACOBMets in '93Tue Oct 27 1992 00:2443
                1       2       3       4               T
STEELERS        7       6       7       7               27
Chiefs          0       3       0       0               3

SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Woodson, 80 yd punt return(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson, 49 yd
STEELERS--FG Anderson, 30 yd
Chiefs----FG Murray, 52 yd
STEELERS--Foster, 4 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--E.Green 4 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)

TEAM STATS:
STEELERS                                        Chiefs
16              1st Downs                       14
40-154          Rushes-Yds                      26-121
109             Passing Yds                     58
13-22-0         Compl-Att-Int                   9-27-3
1-5             Sacked-Yds lost                 2-24
5-50            Punts                           5-45
0-0             Fumbles-Lost                    3-0
11-101          Penalties-Yds                   6-40
35:31           Time of Possession              24:29

Individual Stats:
Rushing:
STEELERS: Foster 24-105, L.Thompson 6-32, Stone 2-11, Hoge 3-6, O'Donnell
          5-0
Chiefs: Okoye 11-73, Word 8-32, McNair 2-14, H.Williams 3-12, Anders 1-1,
        Davis 1-(-11)

Passing:
STEELERS: O'Donnell 13-22-0, 114 yds, 1td
Chiefs: Krieg 9-27-3 82 yds

RECEIVING:
STEELERS: L.Thompson 4-47, Cooper 3-27, Green 3-21, Foster 1-12, Hoge 1-5, 
          Mills 1-2
Chiefs: Birden 4-46, McNair 4-27, W.Davis 1-9


JaKe
35.747MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the Kid...Tue Oct 27 1992 12:409
	Yeah,  If they will only leave the Steelers as underdogs for the
	rest of the season....


	Sure wish we got TNT in Cow Hampshire!

	Bill

	p.s.  JaKe, with that p-name I'd have to stop noting for 3 weeks! ;^)
35.748LJOHUB::CRITZTue Oct 27 1992 15:185
    	Bill,
    
    	I live in Nashua and get TNT. What's the deal?
    
    	Scott
35.749CSOA1::JACOBMets in '93Tue Oct 27 1992 18:3712
    Bill,
    
    It was a fair wager, and I lost.
    
    I cain't do without noting fer a week, so I'll live with it, but will
    have to get the P_name space disinfected afterwards, probably.
    
    I agree on them making the Steelers underdogs.  They're 4-0 as
    underdogs, 1-2 as favorites.
    
    JaKe
    
35.750where did I put that cable stretcher anyway...MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the Kid...Tue Oct 27 1992 18:4016
>>   	Bill,
    
>>    	I live in Nashua and get TNT. What's the deal?
    
>>    	Scott


	Next time the Steelers are on TNT either we are going to have to 
	sting up a cable between Nashua and Merrimack or else I'll just 
	have to make the LONG trip south. ;^)

	By the way, Scott, got another comforable chair in front of the 
	TV?  Not too far from the fridge I hope!  [lotsa ;^)]


	Bill
35.751NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 27 1992 18:4911
    
    > It was a fair wager, and I lost.
    
    Something is definitely amiss, though, when the Pirates win the NL
    East, the Mets finish damn near last, Toronto wins it all, and you're
    still forced to run a "Mets in '93" p-string.  This is not the same
    in-your-face kind of thing as the Penguins taking down the Strangers.
    I think you wuz had, JaKe...
    
    glenn
    
35.752CSOA1::JACOBMets in '93Tue Oct 27 1992 18:518
    Nah, we made the wager back when I was up there in Taxachewshits and we
    was tilting cold ones.  I said if the Bucs made it to the WS they'd win
    it, and TCM said if the Jays made it there they'd win it, so we wagered
    and I went down.  No biggee, I'll get TCM back this year in the Hockey
    playoffs, AGAIN!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
35.753ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93 == Jake's p-nameTue Oct 27 1992 18:567
    
    > No biggee, I'll get TCM back this year in the Hockey playoffs, AGAIN!!!!
    
    You're on JaKe, details to be determined in March/April.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.754PFSVAX::JACOBMets in '93Tue Oct 27 1992 19:009
    I knew you wouldn't be able to resist the hockey thang again, TCM.
    
    It'll be great having ya wear a Pens P-name fer, lessee, how long DID
    you have that thing earlier this year, it seemed like a month or two!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
35.755ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93 == Jake's p-nameTue Oct 27 1992 19:016
    It was for the series against Boston, Chicago and then for 2 more
    weeks. However, since this year the Pens will probably be favored it
    won't be for that long a time - if I lose.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.756PFSVAX::JACOBMets in '93Tue Oct 27 1992 19:1416
    
    >>  <<< Note 35.755 by ACESMK::FRANCUS "Mets in '93 == Jake's p-name" >>>

    >>It was for the series against Boston, Chicago and then for 2 more
    >>weeks. However, since this year the Pens will probably be favored it
    >>won't be for that long a time - if I lose.
    
    >>The Crazy Met
    
    You're just lucky the Pens played as good as they did, cause they
    knocked of both of those losers in 4 games, so ya only had to keep it
    fer 8 days per series, had those series both gone to 7 games, ya would
    have had to wear that fer another 12 days or so.
    
    
    JaKe
35.757STEELERS Unofficial stats, record is 5-2PFSVAX::JACOBMets in '93Wed Oct 28 1992 01:4655

Scoring by Quarter
							
		1       2       3       4               T 

STEELERS        23      42      13      60              138
Opponent        20      36      7       14              77

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               14              12      54
Foster          4               0               0       24
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          2               0               0       12
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
E.Green		1		0		0	 6
Woodson		1		0		0	 6

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          165             747             4.53
Hoge             29             114             3.93
Stone             8              84            10.50
THompson         16              66             4.13
O'Donnell        18               1             0.06
W.Williams	  2		  0		0.00


PASSING:
		Att     Compl   Int    Comp %         Yds     TD
O'Donnell       201      119     3     59.2           1489     7
Royals            1       1      0    100.0             44     0

	
RECEIVING:
		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          34      536     15.8
Stone           21      339     16.1
Hoge            14      126      9.0
Foster          12      107      8.9
Mills           10      125     12.5
Cooper          10      111     11.1
Thompson         7       79     11.3
E.Green		 7	 60	 8.6
Jorden           2       14      7.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0
Davenport        1       13     13.0



JaKe
35.758Thank You Al Del GrecoPFSVAX::JACOBMets in '93Sun Nov 01 1992 21:0823
    THESE GUYS MAY BE FOR REAL, AFTER ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    The Steelers beat the Oilscum today, 21-20.
    
    They came back after trailing 20-7 going into the fourth quarter.  It's
    the second time this season they've beat the Oilscum, and the firsted
    time since 1986 that they've swept the season series with Houscum, and
    the secondtime they've came back from a deficit to beat the Oilscum
    this season.
    
    Barry Foster had hissixth 100 yard performance in 8 games, and ran for
    1 td while O'Donnell hit tight ends Adrian Cooper and Eric Green for
    the Steelers other two TD's.  Hell, a few years ago the Steelers didn't
    even throw to the TE's, letalone let them score.
    
    More tomorrow.
    
    THE STEELERS ARE IN FRISTED PLACE IN THE AFC CENTRAL, with a 6-2
    record.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.759Sentence Served, see P_name!!!!PFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Sun Nov 01 1992 21:095
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.760NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 02 1992 12:367
    
    Had to chuckle at the picture of Cowher standing there on the sidelines, 
    grinning like he knew Del Greco would choke... what is it about the
    Oilers?
    
    glenn
    
35.761Steelers in command nowLJOHUB::HAUSRATHMon Nov 02 1992 13:138
    
    I was suprised the Oilies didn't use the clock more effectively down
    the stretch and at least attempt to get a touchdown.  Face it,
    fieldgoals are never guaranteed, especially 39 yarders.  
    
    Poor coaching, plain and simple.  
    
    /Jeff
35.762PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Nov 02 1992 15:4912
  The Steelers played their hearts out yesterday. The sounds of "Defense
  Defense" and "Here we go Steelers" in 3 Rivers Stadium are music to my ears.
  The won lost column in the AFC central show the Steelers with a 1 game lead,
  but in effect, it's a 2 game lead since they beat the Oilers twice.

  The Steeler's will have another big test next weekend in Buffalo. I hope
  they're the underdogs again. At least everytime they have been an underdog, 
  they won.

  Black and Gold are great football colors.

	Keith  
35.763PFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Mon Nov 02 1992 18:326
    BET DEM UNDERDOG STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Happily
    
    JaKe
    
35.764Go Steelers - as long as you're playing the bad guysBSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 02 1992 18:374
    So the Steelers are playing Luckalo next week.  Looks like I'll have to 
    pull for Pittsburgh for the 3rd week in a row.
    
    Joe
35.765PFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Mon Nov 02 1992 18:4329
    Lessee, two weeks in a row, I go into the game with lots of beer and
    munchies so's I cain get fat and drunk and not worry whether they lost
    or not, and two weeks in a row, they come thru and beat tough teams.
    
    Headed fer "Beer World" before nexted Sunday's game abainst the Bills,
    that's fer sure.  
    
    BTW, anybody able to tell me what time nexted weeks game starts?????
    
    Cain't find a schedule.
    
    Stats from the game in here tonite.
    
    BTW, any of youse actually get to watch this game?????  If so, Why the
    f___ did Cooper get 15 yards for "taunting" when all he did was spike
    the ball when some Oilscum player was nearby????  ALso, did the
    officiating seem one-sided AGAINST the Steelers fer the first three
    quarters??  At one point, the Steelers had amassed 8 penalties for a
    mile and a half, and the "angelic" Oilscum had NO PENALTIES at all!!!
    
    Now, since when does a Houscum team go fer three quarters without
    comitting SOME kind of infraction.  NOt since the days of Bum Phillips.
    
    Also, anybody see the segment on the pregame show about the classic
    Steeler-Oilscum playoff matchups of the late '70s????  Great segment,
    IMHO.
    
    JaKe
    
35.766PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 02 1992 18:494
35.767CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicMon Nov 02 1992 18:5418
35.768PFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Mon Nov 02 1992 19:008
    Youse, Younze, you say tom-ah-to, I say to-may-to, Quayle says potatoe.
    
    Mux Nix.
    
    Both are used around here, but I fergot the "n", to tell the trufe.
    
    JaKe
    
35.769CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for President!!!!!!!Mon Nov 02 1992 19:044
My guess is it's a 4:00 game. NBC/AFC is in the doubleheader bubble this
coming week. I'm sure they'd want to have a premier game as the second
game of the week....
35.770smileys appendedACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Nov 02 1992 19:087
    'Saw
    
    'ya gotta be understandin. Kev's notes have begun to sound like
    English, so JaKe is taking over the RCASO heritage.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.771MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the Kid...Mon Nov 02 1992 19:118
re: yunz, youse...

	According to my O-fishal Pittsburghese dictionary...yunz is most common,
	but since Pittsburghers are anything but standardized, any similar
	variation will do.


	Bill
35.772encircled by womens-libers !!!!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 02 1992 19:179
    Saw the Squeelers/Soilers game...  Fun to watch !!!  Got my first taste
    of baby sitting an infant.  My sister just had a kid about a month ago
    and asked if I could watch the little bugger while she ran an out to a
    NOW rally with my other Sister, my Mother and my Girl Friend.  What a 
    trip that was...  I decided I'm not ready for kids !!!
    
    BG
    
    
35.773PFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Mon Nov 02 1992 19:2312
    
    
    >>						 Got my first taste
    >>of baby sitting an infant. 
    
    What, did Elway come over to your house yesterday????????
    
    How bout them Stillers, BG??
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.774QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Nov 02 1992 19:379
    Squeelers looking pretty tough...  Me and some of the boys were
    just talking about the fact the we were glad that the Squeelers weren't 
    heading out to Denver this season.  They always give the Donks fits
    even when they suck !!...  
    
    I'll tell ya,  that baby stuff is for the birds !! 2 hours is way to
    long...  let alone your entire life.
    
    BG
35.775PFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Mon Nov 02 1992 19:4347
This says it all
                             Central
>>Pittsburgh                     6   2  0   .750   159  97
  Houston                        5   3  0   .625   199 141
  Cleveland                      4   4  0   .500   117 131
  Cincinnati                     3   5  0   .375   139 184

		1	2	3	4	T

Houston		3	3	14	0       20
STEELERS	0	7	0	14	21

Hou--FG Del Greco 29
Hou--FG Del Greco 19
STEELERS--Foster 1 run (Anderson PAT)
Hou--Slaughter 11 pass from Carlson (Del Greco PAT)
Hou--Childress 8 fumble return (Del Greco PAT)
STEELERS--Cooper 2 pass from O'Donnell (Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Green 5 pass from O'Donnell (Anderson PAT)
A--58,074
                             ------
Hou 						Pit
21		First Downs                     20
15-55		Rushes-Yds			35-119
228		Passing Yds			181
28-42-0		Compl-Att-Int			14-22-1
3-20		Sacked-Yds Lost			2-13
3-44.7		Punts				4-41.8
1-1		Fumbles-Lost			2-2
5-29		Penalties			9-101
28:35		Time Of Posession		31:25


RUSHING:
Houston--White 12-44, Moon 2-11, Carlson 1-0
STEELERS--Foster 31-118, Hoge 1-3, O'Donnell 2-2, Thompson 1-(-4)


PASSING:
Houston--Moon 13-19-0-104, Carlson 15-23-0-137
STEELERS--O'Donnell14-22-1   201 yds


RECEIVING
Houston--Jeffires 9-68, White 6-32, Slaughter 5-71, Givins 5-47, Duncan 3-23
STEELERS--Mills 4-61, Green 3-52, Foster2-15, Stone 1-20, Thompson 1-20, 
	  Hoge 1-20, Graham 1-11, Cooper 1-2.
35.776PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Nov 02 1992 19:5815
  Yea, I couldn't believe that ref who threw the flag for spikin the ball.
  Where'd they get that guy from anyways, Romper-Room ??
  Next thing ya know, they'll be dropping flags for spittin or sayin cuss
  words.

  How'd everyone like that big 3rd and 15 completion to the Green monster
  where a couple of defensive backs bounced off him after he caught the ball.
  It didn't look like those defensive backs liked the idea of trying to tackle
  a Mack truck.

  What's the status on Dwight Stone's injury ? The play where he was knocked 
  out of the game looked like a late hit to me. The Black and Gold will need 
  his big play capability next week.
  
	Keith
35.777SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Nov 02 1992 20:1120
    
    
    	Another issue was why in heavens name wasn't this game the BIG
    game for NBC?  Man, the Steelers get no respect.  Instead, Endberg
    and Trumpy were in NYC for the Jets and the Dolphins!  
    
    	I guess money does make the world go around and the NYC market
    was chosen in hopes of drawing more fans to the tube.
    
    	But, clearly, this game was the game of the day yesterday.  Not
    only for 1st place, but the game itself was between rivals and came
    down to the last play!
    
    	Once again, NBC fails to deliever...especially up here in NE!!
    
    	Maybe next week I'll get to see them since they are playing the
    Bills.
    
    	bill..g.
    
35.778ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Nov 02 1992 20:188
    
    Part of it is that NY is a big market, but they could have show it
    locally and maybe not lost too much. Jets-Miami is a big rivalry. They
    always put on an aerial display; so in this case I am not sure that
    Jets-Miami as the national game is as ridiculous as .777 states.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.779NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 02 1992 20:1915
                
    > Another issue was why in heavens name wasn't this game the BIG
    > game for NBC?  Man, the Steelers get no respect.  Instead, Endberg
    > and Trumpy were in NYC for the Jets and the Dolphins!  
    
    Steelers-Oilers was the game being hyped nationally in TV ads on
    Saturday.  I don't know why they didn't have the #1 team on it, but
    they were pushing this matchup as the national game.  Even if it had 
    been a colossal Super Bowl rematch of undefeateds, we weren't going 
    to get it in New England, though, because the Patriots were playing 
    at the same time and they weren't at home where the blackout could 
    have spared us...
    
    glenn
    
35.780ROYALT::ASHEWhoa Black Betty, wham-a-bam...Mon Nov 02 1992 20:231
    Albany got Bills-Pats... Utica got Jets-Dolphins..
35.781BSS::JCOTANCHMon Nov 02 1992 20:523
    Pitt-Luckalo is at 4 eastern nexted week.
    
    Joe
35.784GO STEELERS!!!!!!!Unofficial stats thru 8 gmaesPFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Tue Nov 03 1992 03:0964
                                                          
							
		1       2       3       4               T 

STEELERS        23      49      13      74              159
Opponent        23      39      21      14              97

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               14              15      57
Foster          5               0               0       30
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          3               0               0       18
E.Green		2		0		0	12
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Woodson		1		0		0	 6
Team Stats:

STEELERS				Opponents
151		First Downs		120
272-1121	Rushes/yds		185-731
1592		Passing Yds		1399
134-224-4	Comp-Att-Int		127-243-15
20-145		Sacked/yds lost		13-91
13-11		Fumbles-lost		10-5
52-457		Penalties-yards		57-434
33:11		Time of Possession	26:49
                                                    

Individual Stats:
RUSHING:
		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          196             865             4.41
Hoge             30             117             3.90
Stone             8              84            10.50
THompson         18              62             3.44
O'Donnell        20               3             0.15
W.Williams	  2		  0		0.00
                                                                
PASSING:
		Att     Compl   Int    Comp %         Yds     TD
O'Donnell       223      133     4     59.6           1690     9
Royals            1       1      0    100.0             44     0
                                                                
	
RECEIVING:
		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          35      547     15.6
Stone           22      359     16.3
Hoge            15      146      9.7
Foster          14      122      8.7
Mills           14      186     13.3
Cooper          11      113     10.3
E.Green		10	112	11.2
Thompson         8       99     12.4
Jorden           2       14      7.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0
Davenport        1       13     13.0



JaKe                                
35.785PFSVAX::JACOBThis Space Being Dis-Infected!!Tue Nov 03 1992 03:0914
    
    The stats in -.1 are inaccurate in the "fumbles-lost" area because I
    don't have the fumbles stats from teh Monday night game against
    Cincinnati.
    
    Anybody out there have that stat?????
    
    I'd appreciate it.
    
    thanks
    
    JaKe
    
    
35.786SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Tue Nov 03 1992 11:243
       Steelers should win easy this week. NOBODY wins after playing the
    Pats the week before. Takes a while for the stench to wear off I guess!
                                              Denny
35.787CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicTue Nov 03 1992 12:4618
re Yunz-Youse:

	Oh, I just thought that Youse was the Eastern Pennsylvania
	variation.

	At any rate, I think it's neat.


re Pitt-Hous:

	I too was disappointed not to see that game.  I had a choice
	of NY-Miami on WVIT-TV30 out of New Britain CT, or 
	Buff-NE on TV22 out of Springfield......   Yuk to both....




'Saw
35.788PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 03 1992 14:204
    Bill G., New England is in the AFC East.  There are alot of New York
    fans in New England.  The Dolphins are a main contender in the AFC
    East.  Given all that, I'm not surprised that the Jets/Dolphins game
    was carried in New England rather than an AFC Central game.
35.789PFSVAX::JACOBVote Early AND Often!!Tue Nov 03 1992 18:447
    Thanks fer the KoD, Denny!!!
    
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
35.790SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Thu Nov 05 1992 15:2919
    
    
    	Wow, I never said anything to the issue of why the game wasn't
    on in my area here in NE.  I was questioning why Enberg and Trumpey,
    NBC's no. 1 team was in NYC doing the Jets/Miami game.  
    
    	Even if the Steeler/Oiler game was the No. 1 game, I wouldn't of
    seen it.  My problem dealt with the issue of why NBC's no. 1 team
    wasn't doing that game.
    
    	Personally, because of where I live, I hardly ever get to see
    the Steelers play unless they are on in prime time or are on at a
    different time then the Patriots and then only if the Jets are 
    playing Monday night.  Hey, it comes with the territory.  But my main
    beef still is the fact that if NBC's no. 1 game was Pitt/Houston, where
    was the no. 1 broadcast team?
    
    	bill..g.
    
35.791SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Thu Nov 05 1992 16:212
      Bills/Stillers are on Ch4 @4:00.
                                   Denny
35.792STEELERS LOSE, Green gone fer 6 gamesPFSVAX::JACOBThe Set Hidden Patrol is Riding aginMon Nov 09 1992 18:3324
    Steelers lose to the Bills, but didn't look totally horrible in doi8ng
    so. The guys just don't quit, though.  The Steelers still have to look
    upward to see the AFC's top teams, but the view ain't as bad as it used
    to be.  They trailied 21-6 at the half, the closed it to 21-13 but gave
    up a quick score to the Bills to fall behind 28-13.  The Steelers got
    one more TD, as O'Donnell threw his second TD of the day, closing the
    game to 28-20, which also was the final score.  Berry Foster was held
    to 77 yards on 22 carries.  Eric Green led the Steelers with 4 catches.
    
    The big, in more ways than one, story here in Pittsburgh today is that
    TE Eric Green has been suspended for six weeks by the NFL for substance
    abuse.  The report said it is not steroids, either, so he's evidently
    done some nose candy or toking.  SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEIT!!!!
    
    Rooney said the help is there if Green needs it, Cowher said he's
    disappointed but it's a team sport and the show must go on, with or
    without Green, and Green apologized fer letting his teammates down.
    
    Green will be eligible, if he clears, to return to the Steelers just
    before their lasted game of the season, against the Brown(spot)s(tm).
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.793musta been the second timeHBAHBA::HAASGandhi Cactus JuiceMon Nov 09 1992 19:1013
re: Green.

If'n the punishment is a 6 week suspension, that means that this is the
second time Eric has been caught. They way I understand the rules, the
firsted time you violate the drug rules you get a private warning with no
suspension. 6 weeks means you're a repeat offender.

And as to how big a loss this is, didn't the Steelers do OK if not well
without him earlier this year when he was out?

In any case JaKe, just be glad Detroit is coming to town.

TTom
35.794PFSVAX::JACOBThe Set Hidden Patrol is Riding aginMon Nov 09 1992 19:168
    Adrian Cooper is just as good as Green, at least that's how he looked
    when Green was out with the shoulder injury.
    
    Yer right TTom, this is #2 offense, as teams are prohibited from
    releasing the news when the first offense is taken care of.
    
    JaKe
    
35.795Beebe is a STEELER killer--STEELERS now 6-3PFSVAX::JACOBThe Set Hidden Patrol is Riding aginMon Nov 09 1992 23:2950
SCORING SUMMARY
		1	2	3	4	T
STEELERS	0	6	14	0	20
Bills		7	14	7	0	28

Bills--Lofton 22 yd pass from Kelly(Christie PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 28 yd FG
Bills--Frerotte 2 yd pass from Kelly(Christie PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 50 yd FG
STEELERS--Mills 12 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
Bills--Lofton 45 yd pass from Kelly(Christie PAT)
STEELERS--Hoge 10 yd pass fromO'Donnell(Anderson PAT)

TEAM STATS:
STEELERS					Bills
16		First Downs			31
25-86		Rushes-Yds			44-174
147		Passing Yds			284
15-25-0		Compl-Att-Int			26-33-0
1-12		Sacked-Yds lost			1-6
5-48		Punts				2-30
1-0		Fumbles-Lost			3-2
10-73		Penalties-Yds			7-60
27:28		Time of Possession		32:32

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 22-77, Thompson 2-8, Hoge 1-1
Bills--Thomas 37-155, Davis 4-16, Kelly 3-3

PASSING:
STEELERS--O'Donnell 15-24-0,159 yds 2 TD's, Foster 0-1-0 0yds.
Bills--Kelly 26-33-0, 290 yds 2 TD's.

RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Green 4-41, Foster 4-36, Davenport 3-44, Hoge 2-18, Mills 1-12,
	  Thompson 1-8
Bills--Beebe 8-101, McKeller 5-59, Thomas 4-30, Lofton 3-79, Reed 2-2, Tasker
       1-7, Metzelaars 1-6, Davis 1-4, Frerotte 1-2.





JaKe




35.796STEELERS 6-3, 1 game up in AFC CentralPFSVAX::JACOBThe Set Hidden Patrol is Riding aginMon Nov 09 1992 23:4872
                                                          
							
		1       2       3       4               T  

STEELERS        23      55      27      74              179
Opponent        30      53      28      14              125

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               16              17      65
Foster          5               0               0       30
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          3               0               0       18
E.Green		2		0		0	12
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Woodson		1		0		0	 6
E.Mills		1		0		0	 6
Hoge		1		0		0	 6

Team Stats:                                  

STEELERS				Opponents
167		First Downs		151
297-1207	Rushes/yds		229-905
1739		Passing Yds		1683
149-249-4	Comp-Att-Int		153-276-15
21-157		Sacked/yds lost		14-97
14-11		Fumbles-lost		13-7
62-530		Penalties-yards		64-494
32:33		Time of Possession	27:27
                                                    

Individual Stats:

RUSHING:

		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          218             942             4.32
Hoge             31             118             3.81
Stone             8              84            10.50
THompson         19              70             3.68
O'Donnell        20               3             0.15
W.Williams	  2		  0		0.00
                                                                
PASSING:                                                        

		Att     Compl   Int    Comp %         Yds     TD
O'Donnell       247      148     4     59.9           1849    11
Royals            1       1      0    100.0             44     0
Foster		  0	  0  	 0	0.0		 0     0
                                                                
	
RECEIVING:
		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          35      547     15.6
Stone           22      359     16.3
Foster          18      158      8.8
Hoge            17      164      9.6
Mills           15      198     13.2
E.Green		14	153	10.9
Cooper          11      113     10.3
Thompson         9      107     11.9
Davenport        4       57     14.3
Jorden           2       14      7.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0



JaKe                                

35.797ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Nov 10 1992 04:255
    Actually Steelers lead Houston by 2 since they beat Houston twice this
    season and would get the nod in a tiebreaker with the Oilers.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.798MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Nov 10 1992 13:311
	But they are not 2 games up over Cleveland.
35.799A couple of STEELER notesPFSVAX::JACOBThe Set Hidden Patrol is Riding aginWed Nov 11 1992 22:469
    Neil O'Donnell has a very respectable 91.3 QB raitng after 9 starts
    this year. 
    
    The Steelers activated TE Russ Campbell, who had broken his hand in the
    season opener in Houston, to backup Adrian Cooper, with Eric Green out
    on suspension.
    
    JaKe
    
35.800STEELER now 7-3, 1 game up in AFC CentralPFSVAX::JACOBWas Bush Cursed?I'd Haiti to think soMon Nov 16 1992 14:0966
It was U G L Y, but a win is a win.
    
    

                1       2       3       4       T
Detroit         0       7       0       7       14
STEELERS        7       3       0       7       17

SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Mills 11 yd pass from O'Donnell(ANderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 20 yd FG
Detroit--Green 73 yd pass from Kramer(Hanson PAT)
Detroit--Sanders 1 yd run(Hanson PAT)
STEELERS--Jorden 1 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)

TEAM STATS:
Detroit                                 STEELERS
20              First downs             18
23-90           Rushes-Yds              30-152
286             Passing Yds             164
20-37-2         Compl-Att-Int           19-35-1
3-18            Sacked-Yds Lost         3-33
5-32            Punts                   6-38
5-4             Fumbles-Lost            2-1
8-64            Penalties               10-102
25:50           Time of Possession      34:10

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Detroit--Sanders 21-94, Kramer 2-(-4)
STEELERS--Foster 25-106, Mills 1-20, Thompson 1-13, O'Donnell 2-8,
          Hoge 1-5.

PASSING:
Detroit--Kramer 20-37-2, 304 yds, 2TD's
STEELERS--O'Donnell 17-31-1, 182 yds 1 TD, Brister 2-4-0, 15 yds 1 TD

RECEIVING:
Detroit--Green 6-115, Perriman 5-89, Moore 5-71, Sanders 3-23, McLemore 1-6
STEELERS--Foster 5-52, Mills 4-43, Didio 3-39, Davenport 2-32, Thompson 1-15,
          Hoge 1-7, Cooper 1-6, THigpen 1-2, Jorden 1-1.

Mark Didio was activated from the practice squad Saturday, and caught three
passes for the Steelers, all third down completions for first downs.

Barry Foster had his 7th 100-yard game of the season, tying the club record 
set by Harris in 1975.  Foster needs only 198 yards to set the all-time 
Steeler record for one season, also held by Harris and set in 1975, at 1,246.
Foster has 1,048 right now.  

Foster is only the 4th Steeler running back in their 60 year history to run
for 1,000 yards in a season, including Franco Harris, Rocky Bleier, and 
I ain't sure who the fourth was.

Brister took his first snaps of the 1992 season, and made a decent play fake
on the 1 yd TD pass to Tim Jorden.

No word yet on the severity of O'Donnell's hamstring pull, but speculation
is that he WILL miss next weeks game against the Colts.


JaKe




35.801CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my hero &amp; mentorMon Nov 16 1992 14:444
 Jake have they put Dwight Stone on the IR list?

 mike
35.802MKFSA::LONGI miss Billy the Kid...Mon Nov 16 1992 15:3216
>>Foster is only the 4th Steeler running back in their 60 year history to run
>>for 1,000 yards in a season, including Franco Harris, Rocky Bleier, and 
>>I ain't sure who the fourth was.


JaKe,  

	I'd guess that the fourth would be John Henry Johnson.

re: next week

	I wouldn't worry too much about next week.  Hell, if the Pats can 
beat the Colts, even Mrs Brister's little boy Bubby should be able to handle
the task.

Bill
35.803PFSVAX::JACOBWas Bush Cursed?I'd Haiti to think soMon Nov 16 1992 18:3110
    
 >>Jake have they put Dwight Stone on the IR list?
    
    Mike,
    
    Not to my knowledge.  'sfar as I know, he just keeps being de-activated
    each week.
    
    JaKe
    
35.804STEELERS 7-3, UNOFFICIAL STATSPFSVAX::JACOBBush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!!Mon Nov 16 1992 20:5389
                                                          
							
		1       2       3       4               T  

STEELERS        30      58      27      81              196
Opponent        30      60      28      21              139

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               17              19      70
Foster          5               0               0       30
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          3               0               0       18
E.Green		2		0		0	12
E.Mills		2		0		0	12
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Woodson		1		0		0	 6
Hoge		1		0		0	 6
Jorden		1		0		0	 6

Team Stats:                                  

TEAM STATS:
Detroit                                 STEELERS
20              First downs             18
23-90           Rushes-Yds              30-152
286             Passing Yds             164
20-37-2         Compl-Att-Int           19-35-1
3-18            Sacked-Yds Lost         3-33
5-32            Punts                   6-38
5-4             Fumbles-Lost            2-1
8-64            Penalties               10-102
25:50           Time of Possession      34:10
                                                          
STEELERS				Opponents
183		First Downs		170
328-1367	Rushes/yds		252-995
1895		Passing Yds		1973
168-284-5	Comp-Att-Int		173-313-17
24-195		Sacked/yds lost		16-104
17-13		Fumbles-lost		21-14
71-627		Penalties-yards		72-558    
32:45		Time of Possession	27:15
                                                    

Individual Stats:

RUSHING:

		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          243            1048             4.31
Hoge             32             123             3.84
Stone             8              84            10.50
THompson         20              83             4.15
Mills		  1		 20	       20.00
O'Donnell        22              11             0.50
W.Williams	  2		  0		0.00
                                                                
PASSING:                                                        

		Att     Compl   Int    Comp %         Yds     TD
O'Donnell       278      165     5     59.4           2031    12
Royals            1       1      0    100.0             44     0
Brister		  4	  2	 0     50.0		15     1
Foster		  1	  0  	 0	0.0		 0     0
                                                                
STEELERS--Foster 5-52, Mills 4-43, Didio 3-39, Davenport 2-32, Thompson 1-15,
          Hoge 1-7, Cooper 1-6, THigpen 1-2, Jorden 1-1.
	
RECEIVING:
		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          35      547     15.6
Foster          23      190      8.3
Stone           22      359     16.3
Mills           19      241     12.7
Hoge            19      151      7.9
E.Green		14	152	10.9
Cooper          12      119      9.9
Thompson        10      122     12.2
Davenport        6       89     14.8
Didio		 3	 39	13.0
Jorden           3       15      5.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0



JaKe                          
35.805PFSVAX::JACOBBush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!!Tue Nov 17 1992 13:0829
    Neil O'Donnell, who has led the Steelers to a 7-3 start, their best
    since 1983, is out indefinitely.
    
    O'Donnell's injury was diagnosed as a pulled hamstring.  He was walking
    gingerly, without crutches, when he reported to 3 RIvers Stadium
    Monday, wearing a bandage on his upper left leg.
    
    It is unlikely that O'Donnell will even practice this week, and he is
    not expected to be in uniform for the game against Indianapolis Sunday.
    
    Former Steeler backup QB Rick Strom had a workout with the Steelers
    yesterday, but did not sign a contract.  It is possible he will sign
    later this week.  He has been an off and on Steeler since 1989, and was
    cut prior to this season.  He lives in Pittsburgh.
    
    Walter "Bubby" Brister will get the start this Sunday, his first start
    of the 1992 season.  Starting against him will be Jack Trudeau, subbing
    for injured QB Jeff George, who has a fractured wrist.  
    
    Brister is 26-27 in 53 starts, Trudeau is 14-25 in his 39 starts.
    
    If the Steelers win SUnday, and they are favored by 11, they can clinch
    a no worse than .500 record. Most of the media that covered them during
    training camp believed the team would be fortunate to win 5 games this
    season.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.806PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 17 1992 16:264
35.807SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Tue Nov 17 1992 16:313
       On his lasted play Mac, the one where Tim Goad planted him in the
    turf. He got up holding his hand. Says he hit it on a helmet.
                           Denny
35.808PFSVAX::JACOBBush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!!Tue Nov 17 1992 19:1835
    Finally remembered that Tuesday is the day Bill Cowher's news
    conference is broadcast on the radio, and REMEMBERED TO LISTEN!!!
    
    Cowher said O'Donnell will be in uniform this Sunday, but will only
    play if it's emergency circumstances.
    
    He wouldn't say who, but the Steelers will sign and have in uniform
    another QB Sunday.  Odds are that QB is Rick Strom, who was with the
    Steelers thru pre-season, and according to Cowher, has a very good
    grasp of the Steelers offense.  
    
    COwher also said that O'Donnell will miss this week, but may be back
    nested week.  He stated that a QB having a hamstring problem is not
    like a running back or wide receiver having hamstring problems.  It
    just limits their mobility some.  
    
    He also said that he is concerned with the mounting problem of
    penalties.  The Steelers have had 40 penalties in the lasted 4 weeks.
    
    Back to the QB situation, one reporter asked Cowher if he would
    consider changing status of QB's if Brister plays like Sammy Baugh
    during his tenure as substitute starter.  Cowher returned that he'd
    never seen Baugh play, so he wouldn't know it if Brister played like
    him.  He then said that Neil O'Donnell is his starting QB, and when
    he's healthy enuf to play, he will assume that role once more.
    
    A reporter also asked Cowher if he is concerned about the lack of REAL
    deep threats in the Steeler passing game, and asked him how he, if he
    were still DC with another team, would prepare for the Steelers. 
    Cowher replied that if he was DC at another team, he would be concerned
    with stopping the Steelers running game, and not really worry too much
    about the deep pass.
    
    JaKe
    
35.809QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesTue Nov 17 1992 20:194
    Look for a Squeeler loss this week... Bubby is a bum and will
    prove it this week !!
    
    
35.810PFSVAX::JACOBBush Cursed??I'd Haiti to think so!!Tue Nov 17 1992 20:589
    Big'n'Lame
    
    You know that and I know that BUT he's also going to be running a real
    offense now, not J_e Walt_n's dog dung _ffense.
    
    The defense will keep it in line.
    
    JaKe
    
35.812PFSVAX::JACOBWIll Hillary run the White House??Wed Nov 18 1992 00:2320
    
    Another thing that Cowher addressed during the news conference was the
    problems the Steelers had with the holds on two field goal attempts
    Sunday.
    
    He excused the first botched hold due to weather, as it was snowing
    fiercely when the play was ran.  He said the second one was completely
    Royals' fault, as the snap was good enuf to get down, but the ball was
    placed improperly, causing Anderson to kick it into the line.
    
    When asked whether he was considering replacing Royals as holder,
    Cowher said no.  He said if he replaced a player just because of a
    couple of mistakes, he would have replaced Barry Foster after game 2,
    as he had fumble troubles early on in the season.
    
    JaKe
    

    
                         
35.813QUASER::JACKSONTAAs the stomach churnesThu Nov 19 1992 13:461
      Careful BG,  you don't want to chomp on that bird monday!
35.814A Sad Lesson that Drugs hav no place in Da WorldPFSVAX::JACOBWIll Hillary run the White House??Thu Nov 19 1992 14:4283
SCURRY'S SAD LESSON MAY SAVE GREEN
reprinted WITH permission from Gateway Publications, 11-18-1992

By

Jim Damp

        They played different sports, but both arrived in Pittsburgh with
blaring trumpets announcing how these two young men would forever change
the face of the games they played.
        Both men had the extraordinary ability to dominate games as amateurs 
and, according to their reams of press clippings, would continue to do so at
the professional level.
        Each man was a number one draft pick nad each was expected to help
his team hoist plenty of championship banners at 600 Stadium Circle(Note:
this is the address of Three Rivers Stadium).
        Eric Green of the Steelers probably never met former Pirate Rod
Scurry.
        But, it would behoove the mammoth Steeler tight end to hear the story
of the late Bucco left-hander.
        Scurry led his Reno, Nev. high school team to the state championship.
Soon after, the Pirates picked the southpaw in the first round of the 1974 
amateur draft.  He was the 11th player selected overall.
        Scurry's curve ball broke like the river in Brady's Bend(JaKenote:
Brady's Bend is a place in Pa. where the Allegheny River makes a couple of U
turns).  The pitch broke so hard that he often made contact hitters look 
foolish.  After a six-year stint in the minor leagues, Scurry made it to 
"the show" in 1980.
        He was an integral part of the Pirate teams that challenged for penn-
ants in the early 1980s.  Scurry was the left-handed stopper out of the 
bullpen and showed flashes of brilliance that led one to believe he would
eventually reach the potential expected of a first round draft pick.
        Scurry never soared to the heights that he probably could have 
reached on talent alone.
        In addition to being an integral part of the team a decade ago, Scurry
was also a major player in the darkest era in the history of Pittsburgh 
baseball.  The Bucco reliever was one of the plethora of players involved 
in the drug scandal that made the Pirate clubhouse look more like a crack-
house.
        This era came close to killing baseball in Pittsburgh.  The same era
had a huge hand in the demise and eventual death of Rod Scurry.
        Scurry, as everyone with even a remote interest in sports knows, was
a substance abuser.  He was addicted to cocaine.
        In this timeframe, Scurry admitted he barely cared about baseball.
All he really cared about, he said, was putting the white powder up his nose.
He often came to the ballpark loaded nad without sleeping for three days at
a time during binges.
        His teammates either didn't know or didn't care.  And the abuse con-
tinued.
        Scurry eventually felt he was killing himself, he said, after check
ing himself out of rehabilitation for the first time.  He either had to 
change or would die, he told reporters.  The left-hander tried.  He was in
and out of rehab throughout the decade.
        Earlier this month, his Reno neighbors called police to report 
erratic behavior by Scurry.
        Scurry told police he was being "bitten" by snakes.  This type of 
severe paranoia accurs in people who have used cocaine for a number of years.
He refused to cooperate with the Nevada lawmen who wanted to take Scurry to
a safer place.
        A struggle ensued and Scurry lapsed into a coma.  Several days later
Rod Scurry was dead, long before he reached his 40th birthday.
        The National Football League and the Steelers refuse to tell us 
exactly what Eric Green was abusing. But a second offense garners a suspension
so it's something he has used on more than one occasion.
        A hockey player once told me that the most difficult part of being 
a professional athlete is dealing with the amount of free time the job allows.
        "It's easy to see how guys have alcohol and drug problems, because
our days aren't regimented," he said.
        Eric Green has teh potential to redefine the position of tight end 
in the NFL.  He's huge, he's fast, and he has hands that are viselike when
it comes to catching passes.
        There's probably not a lot Green needs to learn on the field to become
an all-pro.
        Off the field, Green might need a lesson on how to better manage his
time, before his time runs out.
        Like Scurry's did.



JaKe


35.816STEELERS 8-3, headed for AFC Central titlePFSVAX::JACOBNewcastle Brown 'll sure smack ya downSun Nov 22 1992 20:3533
    The Steelers beat the COlts today, 30-14.  The defense played good
    almost all day, 'cept fer a 81 yd brain cramp that led to the Colts
    first TD.  Also, Trudeau moved the Colts good in a quasi two-minute
    drill, driving for one TD, then driving towards another, only to throw
    an interception in the end zone.
    
    Barry Foster set a Steeler record, rushing for 168 yards, and his 8th
    100 yard game of the season, breaking Franco Harris' record of 7 100 yd
    games in a season.
    
    Foster needs less than 50 yards(don't remember the EXACT amount) to
    break Harris' single season STeeler record of 1248.
    
    Brister showed why he's a no. 2 QB, looking indecisive at times, and
    throwing many incompletions way over the receiver's heads.  Thanks God
    Indy is one lousy team.
    
    The Steelers chances of winning the AFC Central crown were helped
    immensely today as CLevescum AND Houscum both lost.  They now have a 2
    game + lead(won season series) over the Oilscum, and a 3 game lead over
    the Brown(spot)s(tm).  
    
    The New York Times power ratings for the NFL place the Steelers at 4th
    place overall, behind San Francisco, Buffalo and Dallas.
    
    It's about time the Steelers won big over a bad team.
    
    More tomorrow, stats and all.
    
    JaKe
    

    
35.817STEELERS 8-3, 2+ game lead in AFC Central!!!!PFSVAX::JACOBNewcastle Brown'll sure smack ya downMon Nov 23 1992 17:1945
                1       2       3       4       T
Colts           0       0       7       7       14
STEELERS        7       6       14      3       30

SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Foster 20 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 31 yd FG
STEELERS--Anderson 22 yd FG
Colts--Culver 1 yd run(Biasucci PAT)
STEELERS--Foster 13 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Thompson 2 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Colts--Culver 4 yd pass from Trudeau(Biasucci PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 36 yd FG

TEAM STATS:
Colts                                           STEELERS
16                      First Downs             20
21-71                   Rushes-Yds              44-253
258                     Passing Yds             109
19-42-3                 Compl-Att-Int           10-22-1
1-8                     Sacked-Yds lost         0-0
7-43                    Punts                   4-50
2-0                     Fumbles-Lost            1-1
11-79                   Penalties-Yds           5-37
22:41                   Time Of Possession      37:19


Individual Stats:
RUSHING
Colts--A.Johnson 19-68, Culber 2-3, 
STEELERS--Foster 28-168, Thompson 8-52, Stone 1-17, Hoge 3-14, Brister 4-2

PASSING
Colts--Trudeau 19-41-3 266 yds 1td, Tupa 0-1-0
STEELERS--Brister 10-22-1 109 yds 0 TD

RECEIVING:
Colts--Langhorne 8-98, Brooks 5-50, Hester 2-88, A.Johnson 2-4, Cash 1-22
       Culver 1-4
STEELERS--Mills 4-36, Thompson 2-16, Hoge 2-6, Foster 1-42, Davenport 1-9.


JaKe

35.818NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 30 1992 15:3613
    
    With the Steelers at 9-3 now, and the Bills the same after an 
    incomprehensible loss to the Colts yesterday, Pittsburgh should be 
    thinking big, towards home-field advantage throughout the playoffs.
    The Bills own the head-to-head tie-breaker, but have two tough road
    games left the last two weeks of the season (New Orleans and Minnesota,
    I think).  I can't see anybody in the AFC beating Buffalo in Buffalo
    (not that I expect anyone to beat them on the road, either, but at
    least there's hope).  The Steelers should use this as their motivation
    if they continue to play this well and wrap up the AFC Central early...
    
    glenn
    
35.819PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckMon Nov 30 1992 17:0426
The Bungholes started breaking in a QB yesterday who will be good competition 
for Bernice Kosar.  Klingler looked pretty good in uniform, but how long
will it be before he breaks out the dresses and heels he used to wear
in the TV show M*A*S*H ???????  (8^)*


A few team records fell yesterday during the Steelers' beating of the hapless
Bungholes.

        1.)  The Steelers had 10 sacks, most in a game in the team's 
             history.  THe most previous was 9, also against the Bungholes
             in 1983.

        2.)  Barry Foster eclipsed Franco Harris single season team record
             of 1246, which Harris set in a 14 game season.  It took Foster
             only 12 games to break it.

        3.)  Foster also broke Harris' single season combined yardage Steeler
             record.

The Steelers are one step closer to the AFC Central title, retaining a 2 game
advantage(actually more like 2-1/2 since they beat the Oilscum twice)over the
Oilscum of Houston, and a 3 game lead over the Brown(spot)s(tm).

JaKe

35.820STEELERS now 9-3PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckMon Nov 30 1992 17:0539
                1       2       3       4       T
STEELERS        7       7       7       0       21
Bengals         0       6       0       3       9

STEELERS--Davenport 34 yd fumble return(Anderson PAT)
Bengals---Breech 33 yd FG
STEELERS--Foster 2 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Bengals---Breech 42 yd FG
STEELERS--Foster 1 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Bengals---Breech 38 yd FG

TEAM STATS:
STEELERS                                Bengals
17              First Downs             15
33-99           Rushes-Yds              25-160
141             Passing Yds             68
10-18-1         Comp-Att-Int            16-34-0
1-8             Sacked-Yds Lost         10-72
5-45            Punts                   7-40
1-1             Fumbles-Lost            2-1
2-10            Penalties               3-13
27:25           Time of Possession      32:35

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 25-102, Hoge 3-8, O'Donnell 3-(-4), Thompson 2-(-7)
Bengals---H.Green 16-116, Klingler 8-44, Ball 1-0

PASSING:
STEELERS--O'Donnell 10-18 1 INT 149 yds
Bengals---Klingler 16-34 0 Int 140 yds

RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Graham 5-60, Stone 2-33, Davenport 1-31, Foster 1-16, Hoge 1-9
Bengals---Query 5-49, Thompson 5-40, Pickens 4-34, Holman 2-17.

Jake

35.821Like to see the New up and coming teams :-)RUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSMon Nov 30 1992 17:3112
    Someone made a comment about Defense Wins Championships !!!! Well low
    and Behold the Steelers have only allowed 162 pts, a mere 13pts per
    game, not bad for no D, now lets look at the Mighty Bills D, 37 more
    with 199 or 16pts per game, not a BIG Difference, but 3 pts is about
    the difference between beating Indy or losing to them :-)
    
    GO Steelers, it doesnt look good for the Raiders or the colts so Ill
    be rooting for the Steelers or San Diego to come on strong down the
    stretch, let send Buffalo, Miami and Denver home Early on in the
    Playoffs....
    
    								MaB
35.822Go SEACHICKENS!!!!!!CNTROL::CHILDSDontcha miss Charlie's Angels reruns?Mon Nov 30 1992 17:3610
    
>    GO Steelers, it doesnt look good for the Raiders or the colts so Ill
>    be rooting for the Steelers or San Diego to come on strong down the
>    stretch, let send Buffalo, Miami and Denver home Early on in the
>    Playoffs....
    
 
 let's not send Denver at all!!!!!!!!!!!!

 mike
35.823PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Nov 30 1992 18:2616
  I've only seen 2 or 3 complete Steeler games this year. But I've seen a lot
  of highlight's on ESPN's NFL primetime. Foster certainly looks like a 
  great back but when I watch all of those highlight's, I see a lot of the 
  defenders being knocked over by the Steeler offensive linemen. Last year,
  the Steeler offensive line was one of the weakest in the NFL. It still
  isn't a great offensive line but it is one of the better offensive lines 
  in the AFC. Duval Love was a Plan B steal. Hat's off to Cowher and company 
  for turning a weakness into an asset.

  The Steeler's have an excellent chance to get home field advantage 
  throughout the playoffs. 3 of their last 4 games are at home against
  average to poor teams. It would be very hard for them to beat the Bills 
  in Buffalo, but in 3 Rivers Stadium, Jim Kelly and company don't have to 
  like it.

	Keith
35.824SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Nov 30 1992 20:2223
    
    
    	Although I've only seen a couple of games and I'm still a steeler
    fan, this fan still remains skeptical about this present version of
    the Steelers.
    
    	Why?  Simply because the Steelers have had a real easy schedule.
    Because of their poor finish last year, that enabled them to play more
    sub .500 teams than say a Buffalo.
    
    	I don't have the figures handy, but I'd like to see how many .500+
    teams the Steelers have played this year based upon last years final
    results and compare that with some of the other division leaders or
    wild card hopefuls.
    
    	Mind you, this in no way takes away from a fine year they have had,
    but I'm also looking at the strength of schedules too.  The Steelers
    have a shot, a real shot with basically a no-name team.  My only wish
    is that I had more of a chance to see them on the tube!
    
    
    	bill..g.
    
35.825STEELERS UNOFFICIAL Cumulative stats, 9-3PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckMon Nov 30 1992 21:2383
							

		1       2       3       4               T  

STEELERS        44      71      48      84              247
Opponent        30      66      35      31              162

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               20              25      85
Foster          9               0               0       54
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          3               0               0       18
E.Green         2               0               0       12
E.Mills         2               0               0       12
Davenport       1               0               0        6
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Woodson         1               0               0        6
Hoge            1               0               0        6
Jorden          1               0               0        6
Thompson        1               0               0        6
						     

TEAM STATS:                                               
							  
STEELERS                                Opponents
220             First Downs             201
405-1719        Rushes/yds              298-1226
2145            Passing Yds             2299
188-324-7       Comp-Att-Int            208-391-20
25-203          Sacked/yds lost         27-184
19-15           Fumbles-lost            25-15
78-674          Penalties-yards         86-650
32:18           Time of Possession      27:42


INDIVIDUAL STATS:

RUSHING:                                            

		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          296            1318             4.45
Hoge             38             145             3.82
Thompson         30             128             4.27
Stone             9             101            10.50
Mills             1              20            20.00
Brister           4               2             0.50
O'Donnell        25               7             0.28
W.Williams        2               0             0.00
----------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          405            1721             4.25                                                                

PASSING:                                                  

		Att     Compl   Int    Comp %   yd/comp   Yds     TD        
O'Donnell       296     175      6     59.1     12.46     2180    12
Royals            1       1      0    100.0     44.00       44     0
Brister          26      12      1     50.0     10.33      124     1
Foster            1       0      0      0.0      0.00        0     0
--------------------------------------------------------------------        
TOTAL           324     188      7     58.0     12.49     2348    13
RECEIVING:

		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          40      607     15.2
Foster          25      248      9.9
Stone           24      392     16.3
Mills           23      277     12.7
Hoge            22      166      7.5
E.Green         14      152     10.9
Cooper          12      119      9.9
Thompson        12      138     12.2
Davenport        8      129     16.1
Didio            3       39     13.0
Jorden           3       15      5.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0
------------------------------------
TOTAL          188     2326     12.4

JaKe                          

35.826PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckFri Dec 04 1992 18:374
    Barry Foster was named AFC Offensive player of the Month for November.
    
    JaKe
    
35.827OH MY GAWD, IT'S BUBBY BALL (8^(*PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckSun Dec 06 1992 19:3617
    STEELERS win   * U G L Y *, over the Seachickens, 20-14, but lost Neil
    O'Donnell INDEFINITELY with a cracked tibula in the right leg.  I'll
    put more in here on this when I get wind of it.
    
    Barry Foster ran for his 10th 100 yd of this year, leaving him 2 shy of
    Eric Dickerson's(Football's answer to Barry Bonds) record of 12 in a
    season.  Foster and the STEELERS have 3 games to go.
    
    The best thing to come out of today is that the Jests beat the Bills,
    leaving the STEELERS with the best record in the AFC, and on top of the
    AFC Central.  The STEELERS only need to win 1 of their remaining 3
    games to clinch the AFC Central title.  Having the best record, should
    they win their remaining 3 games, would give them homefield throughout
    the playoffs.
    
    JaKe
    
35.828CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Dec 07 1992 10:545
And as Terry Bradshaw said late yesterday, "Woe to the teams that come
into Three Rivers when there is playoff fever in the air"....


'Saw
35.829Not thrilled by the prospect of Bubby BallPFSVAX::JACOBBack to the old grindMon Dec 07 1992 12:2923
    The word here in Pittsburgh is that O'Donnell is out fer "ABOUT" six
    weeks.  And it's a cracked fibula.
    
    The Steelers are 138-42 in Three Rivers Stadium.
    
    Brister continued to sail the ball in yesterday's close call, he's
    sailed his passes throughout the games he's played this year.
    
    O'Donnell had 6 interceptions coming into this game, and before leaving
    with the broken leg, he threw three in the game, in fact, he completed
    his firsted attempt, then threw 3 consecutive interceptions.   The only
    good to come from that was Seattle's inept offense converted NONE of
    those turnovers into points, even though two of them left the
    Seachickens deep in Steeler territory.
    
    How long before Seattle waives that place kicker and signs somebody
    new??
    
    Are the Steelers DOOMED by the impending return of "Bubby Ball" or will
    the best thing he does be handing the ball to Barry Foster??
    
    JaKe
    
35.830CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Dec 07 1992 12:418
>    Are the Steelers DOOMED by the impending return of "Bubby Ball" or will
>    the best thing he does be handing the ball to Barry Foster??
    
It could be the end of the Steelers season.  Then again, who knows....


'Saw    

35.831If the Giants won with Hostetler, the Steelers have a chanceNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 07 1992 13:1012
    
    The end?  I don't think so.  *If* (a big if, I'll admit), Brister can 
    avoid making big mistakes, the Steelers aren't a much different team 
    than with O'Donnell in there.  The Steelers aren't relying on their
    quarterback to make many plays, less so than any other winning team
    than football, as a matter of fact.  They do need to hold onto that 
    homefield advantage, though, where playing in Pittsburgh (the worse the 
    weather, the better) can allow them to win games on the strengh of their 
    running game and defense...
                     
    glenn
    
35.832Who's next?CSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketMon Dec 07 1992 13:256
What is the Steeler's remaining schedule?  Please include where they
play, also.

Thanks,

Jerry
35.833BTW, STEELERS first in AFC to clinch playoffs berthPFSVAX::JACOBBack to the old grindMon Dec 07 1992 15:596
    Nexted week, they play the Bear in Chicago, then they play the Vikings
    in Pittsburgh, and they close the regular season out in Pittsburgh
    against the Clevescum Brown(spot)s(tm).
    
    JaKe
    
35.834Squeelers No 1 ??????? NOT! LUDWIG::WHITEHAIRMon Dec 07 1992 16:016
    
    	Looks like a 0 - 3 showing...maybe 1 - 2 at best!
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
35.835PFSVAX::JACOBBack to the old grindMon Dec 07 1992 16:058
    Hey Hal, 1-2 gets them their first AFC Central title since 1983 and I'm
    sure we'll take it.
    
    The 'Spots will sip Lake Erie Scum water and finish out 2-1 at best,
    fer sure.
    
    JaKe
    
35.836STEELERS 10-3, best record in AFCPFSVAX::JACOBBack to the old grindMon Dec 07 1992 16:0542
                1       2       3       4       T
Seattle         0       7       7       0       14
STEELERS        7       3       0       10      20

SCORING SUMMARY:
STEELERS--Mills 19 yd pass from O'Donnell(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson 38 yd
Seattle---Kane 28 yd pas from Gelbaugh(Kasay PAT)
Seattle---J.L.Williams 3 yd pass from Gelbaugh(Kasay PAT)
STEELERS--Foster 4 yd run(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--FG Anderson 39 yd

TEAM STATS:
Seattle                                         STEELERS
10                      1st Downs               16
22-67                   Rushes-Yds              37-138
153                     Passing Yds             168
13-28-1                 Compl-Att-Int           16-29-5
3-26                    Sacked-Yds lost         2-5
4-40                    Punts                   3-46
4-1                     Fumbles-Lost            3-0
6-59                    Penalties-Yds           7-50
23:57                   Time of Possession      36:03

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Seattle---Warren 14-43, Gelbaugh 3-16, Blades 1-5, J.L.Williams 4-3
STEELERS--Foster 33-125, Stone 1-7, Brister 2-6, O'Donnell 1-0

PASSING:
Seattle---Gelbaugh 13-28 1 Int 2 TD's, 179 yds
STEELERS--O'Donnell 10-17 3 Int's 1 TD 104 yds, Brister 6-12 2 Int's 69 yds

RECEIVING:
Seattle---J.L.Williams 8-98, Kane 2-40, Blades 2-40, Heller 1-1
STEELERS--Foster 5-29, Stone 3-44, Thompson 3-41, Graham 2-30, Hoge 2-10
          Mills 1-19

JaKe


35.838Steelers leading the packHBAHBA::HAASGandhi Cactus JuiceMon Dec 07 1992 17:0217
JD,

This comes back to the earlier discussion of exactly who is going to
represent the AFC in the Super Bowl. It seems that about everyone at the
top except for Pittsburgh - and possibly San Diego - is working hard at
losing now and avoiding the playoffs. Buffalo has to be the most pathetic
since they're doing everything they can to keep the rest of the pack in
the hunt. The AFC West is folding fast. San Diego looks like they're
trying hard to win it.

So looking at the record it looks like Pittsburgh is the team to beat and
they're still winning.

As soon as the AFC decides if they're going to show up this year we can
probably pencil them in for another Super Loss.

TTom
35.840CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Dec 07 1992 17:4235
The only thing lacking with the 'Boys is they are one weapon short.

If you can shut down Irvan and Smith, then you've shut them down, period.
That's a lot to try and do, but if a rejuvenated Buffalo could do it,
then it might be an interesting Super Bowl matchup.


If it were not for this losing streak that Buffalo is on, I would rank
the teams (in echelon) as follows:


		San Fran	Buffalo
	----------------        ----------------
		Dallas		Pittsburgh
	---------------		----------------
		N.O.		Denver
		Phil		KC
		Wash		Miami
	---------------		----------------

	all the rest		all the rest


No order is implied within a level.  And obviously, it's open to much
interpretaion, in fact, I might almost put Miami in with Pittsburgh
if they had a better o-line....


Just an opinion of the moment....


'Saw


PS  I bet San Fran takes it all......
35.841ROYALT::ASHEWhat people do... for money...Mon Dec 07 1992 17:511
    Novacek's not a bad receiver...
35.842WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsMon Dec 07 1992 18:1610
    
    
    Saw, Though I do agree with ya about SF takin it all I also think your
    ranking Miami and Denver a bit high. I believe both SD and Cleveland
    have got a better team than the previous 2 I mentioned.
    
           Even Though Kosar will find a way to blow it down the wire and
    Clevelands Defensive stand the past 4-5 weeks will all be for not.
    
    Chappy.
35.844PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Mon Dec 07 1992 18:4543
Not to denigrate Jake, but if the Steelers are the
best team in the AFC, then AFC fans can expect, barring
a miracle, another loss in the Super Bowl.   

>>The Steelers have a nice team.  But I wouldn't be
>>putting them in da BOWL yet...
>>Not to denigrate Jake, but if the Steelers are the
>>best team in the AFC, then AFC fans can expect, barring
>>a miracle, another loss in the Super Bowl.   

>>The Steelers have a nice team.  But I wouldn't be
>>putting them in da BOWL yet...
    
  JD, see below 
    
    
              <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 35.836                    PITTSBURGH STEELERS                    836 of 843
PFSVAX::JACOB "Back to the old grind"                42 lines   7-DEC-1992 13:05
                     -< STEELERS 10-3, best record in AFC >-
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    I didn't even think of implying that by having the best record, the
    STEELERS are the best team in the AFC.  The STEELERS have come a long
    way from lasted year's 7-9 finish, but they have a long way to go
    before they even come close to the likes of Buffalo and even KC.
    Unlike some fan of another AFC CENTRAL team, that sees the world thru
    BROWN glasses, and gets his thought jumbled that his team has
    re-arrived at playoff football, It would suprise me greatly if this
    STEELER team was to make it through the playoffs, although anything's
    possible, especially if they get home field advantage throughout the
    playoffs, and it's cold and snowy, etc.  
    
    They've won the games this year that they lost in the recent past years
    and made them a losing team.  They played Buffalo tight, and have yet
    to be blown out.  The defense is opportunistic, but the offense is
    riding a roller coaster that, in the lasted three weeks, is having
    trouble getting back to the top of the big hill.
    
    JaKe
    
35.845QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksMon Dec 07 1992 19:017
      I take it that yesterdays sqeelr/seachick game was as bad as last
    mondays donk/seachick game?
    
      Alot of turnovers and possible turnovers.  Maybe seattle just has a
    nack of making people look bad?
    
     Tim
35.846ROYALT::ASHEWhat people do... for money...Mon Dec 07 1992 19:182
    No, that was the Colts/Pats game.  I had a chance to go for free
    and still am glad I didn't go...
35.847PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Mon Dec 07 1992 19:3445
    
    >>    <<< Note 35.845 by QUASER::JACKSONTA "The QB shuffle stinks" >>>

    >>  I take it that yesterdays sqeelr/seachick game was as bad as last
    >>mondays donk/seachick game?
    
    >>  Alot of turnovers and possible turnovers.  Maybe seattle just has a
    >>nack of making people look bad?
    
    You got it, Tim.
    
    The Steelers, after turning the ball over on their first three
    possessions, all of which resulted in 2 missed field goals fer the
    SeaChickens, finally got out in front 10-0, only to allow Seattle to
    put together two drives and make the score 14-10, Seattle.
    
    With 2:20 left, Barry Foster capped a 13 play, 80 yard drive with a 4
    yard run, putting the Steelers up 17-14.  Seattle failed to get a
    firsted down on the next possession, and the STEELERS ran three up the
    middle and kicked a FG to seal it at 20-14.
    
    O'Donnell opened up the game with a completion to Hoge, and then
    proceeded to throw three consecutive interceptions, one a bad pass that
    just took a little too long getting to the reciever, letting the DB
    step in front and pick it off, the next, a pass that bounced out of the
    hand of the intended receiver and up into the air, making it easy
    pickings fer the defense, and the third, a throw just out of the reach
    of Jeff Graham and into the arms of the DB.
    
    Brister also had two "classic Brister" interceptions, right into the
    hands of the defense, making it a grand total of 5 ints fer the day,
    this from an offense that had only thrown 7 interceptions for the first
    12 games.
    
    Foster had 125 yards on 33 carries, but had no run longer than 12 yards
    in the game.
    
    I sure hope the offense shows up, even though O'donnell won't be
    running it, nexted week in Chicago, and hope the defense continues to
    play the "bend but not break" defense that has them ranked 2nd in the
    league in least points allowed, with New Orleans being the only team
    that's allowed fewer points.
    
    JaKe
    
35.848PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 07 1992 19:3711
>  pencil in a loss
>  chalk up another loss for the AFC
>  etc.

   The last time we heard things like this about a Steeler playoff team 
   was in 1974 when the winner of the Raider/Dolphin playoff game was 
   supposed to be the sure fire winner of the Superbowl.

   Shall we say the rest is history.

	Keith
35.849SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Dec 07 1992 19:5229
    
    re: -1
    
    
    	yea, but the Steelers of '74 had an awesome defense along with
    a crushing running game.  They had the O weapons and had plenty to
    go around on D.  The curtain was rising!  This edition worries me on
    defense.  To many gambles and no rush without sending the corners.
    Add to that a questionable offense i.e. Foster right, Foster left,
    Foster up the middle, and the Steelers could be stopped rather easily.
    
    	The main issue now and in the nexted few weeks is which team is
    peaking!  The Bills seemed to have peaked early in the season along
    with the Dolphins and Steelers.  Over in the NFC, the same could be
    said for Philly.
    
    	Going into the playoffs, a team should be peaking and not past its
    peak.
    
    	Either way, I still say the Steelers have had it easy schedule wise
    and this could really show come playoff time.  Although the '9ers and
    Cowboys look good right now, this is a pretty open playoff with no real
    clear cut 'heavies'.  
    
    	But, if the Steelers do manage to make it to the AFC Championship,
    it will be a real Cinderella story that's fer shere!
    
    bill..g.
    
35.850PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Mon Dec 07 1992 19:594
    IMHO, Bill Cowher already has AFC Coach of the Year wrapped up.
    
    JaKe
    
35.851IMOHOWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsMon Dec 07 1992 20:025
    
    
        Should only be 2 contenders Him and Bobby Ross.
    
              Unless Hal wants to nominate Belicek :-).
35.852PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 07 1992 20:4627
  Yea, Bill, I agree with you. It's hard to see the Steeler's going to
  the Big Dance and winning it, especially with Bubble Ball, who pitches
  wiffle balls, at the healm.

  But... I felt the same way back in 74. Yea, the Steeler's don't have
  a great offense like Miami or Oakland. Bradshaw still can't spell C A T.
  The Black and Gold defense will play good and keep them in the game but 
  they'll be out matched by the multi dimensional attacks of the Raiders or 
  the Dolphins. In 74, everybody knew the Steelers had a good defense, they 
  just didn't know how good. The rest of the 70's proved they had one of the 
  all time great defenses. The offense hadn't arrived yet even though the 
  future stars were on the team.
  
  The optimistic side of me says that the defense can play inspired ball,
  especially the secondary where they are capable of making big plays.
  Recently, the defensive line has looked much improved over previous years.
  Barry Foster and a few well timed passes could carry them a long way.
  And, as someone pointed out a few replies back, woe to any team who comes
  to 3 rivers stadium when playoff fever is in the air. When it's cold outside
  and the snow flakes are flying and 60,000 fans are yellin DEFENSE, DEFENSE,
  a lot of good teams could find themselves packin back to their home
  towns wondering what hit em.

  Here's hopin Bubble Baby plays the best ball of his life the rest of 
  the season.

	Keith  
35.853STEELERS UNofficial Stats thru 13 games(10-3)PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Mon Dec 07 1992 20:5185
							   
		1       2       3       4               T  

STEELERS        51      74      48      94              267
Opponent        30      73      42      31              176

STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               22              27      93
Foster          10              0               0       60
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          3               0               0       18
E.Mills         3               0               0       18
E.Green         2               0               0       12
Davenport       1               0               0        6
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Woodson         1               0               0        6
Hoge            1               0               0        6
Jorden          1               0               0        6
Thompson        1               0               0        6
						     
                                                          
TEAM STATS:                                               
							  
STEELERS                                Opponents
236             First Downs             211
442-1859        Rushes/yds              320-1293
2313            Passing Yds             2452
204-363-12      Comp-Att-Int            221-419-21
27-208          Sacked/yds lost         30-210
22-15           Fumbles-lost            29-16
85-724          Penalties-yards         92-709
32:35           Time of Possession      27:25


INDIVIDUAL STATS:

RUSHING:                                            

		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          329            1443             4.39
Hoge             38             145             3.82
Thompson         30             128             4.27
Stone            10             108            10.80
Mills             1              20            20.00
Brister           6               8             1.33
O'Donnell        26               7             0.27
W.Williams        2               0             0.00
----------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          442            1859             4.21

PASSING:                                                  
                Att	Comp	Int	%	Avg/com	   Yds	  TD   Int %
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O'Donnell       313     185      9     59.1     12.35     2284    13    2.9
Brister          38      18      3     50.0     10.33      193     1    7.9
Royals            1       1      0    100.0     44.00       44     0    0.0
Foster            1       0      0      0.0      0.00        0     0    0.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL           353     204     12     57.8     12.36     2521    14    3.4


RECEIVING:

		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          42      637     15.2
Foster          30      277      9.2
Stone           27      436     16.1
Mills           24      296     12.3
Hoge            23      176      7.3
Thompson        15      179     11.9
E.Green         14      152     10.9
Cooper          12      119      9.9
Davenport        8      129     16.1
Didio            3       39     13.0
Jorden           3       15      5.0
W. Williams      1       44     44.0
------------------------------------
TOTAL          204     2521     12.4

JaKe                                                      


35.854JUPITR::PARTEEit's a great day for hockey!Mon Dec 07 1992 23:2510
    
    The deservedly much-maligned Brister did have a great game in the
    playoffs against Denver a few years back.  Stillers should have won 
    that one. 
    
    There's still a dent in my coffee table from a beer bottle flung in
    anger during that game.
    
    Charlie
    
35.855PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Tue Dec 08 1992 02:0511
    
    >>There's still a dent in my coffee table from a beer bottle flung in
    >>anger during that game.
    
    Now I hope it was an empty beer bottle, it'd be a miserable waste of a
    good beer if it was full.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
35.856MKFSA::LONGchoosy drinkers choose JifTue Dec 08 1992 11:143
	Does anyone know when (if) Eric Green is due back?

	Bill
35.857FSCORE::PAVEZKADrink Canada Dry....I'm tryingTue Dec 08 1992 11:525
    I heard last night that the reports on Neil O's injury are not as bad
    as first feared.  The bone broken is a non-weight bearing bone and he
    is expected back in about 2 weeks.
    
    pete
35.858PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Tue Dec 08 1992 18:3710
    A.)  Eric Green is eligible to play again the last regular season game
    this year.
    
    B.)  re.857, TRUE.  It was stated here today the O'Donnell will be
    allowed to return to running and practicing as soon as the discomfort
    eases.  The bone is indeed, non-weight bearing and O'Donnell is said to
    be slated to return for the Clevescum game.
    
    JaKe
    
35.859Browns 2 - Squeelers 0ROULET::WHITEHAIRWed Dec 09 1992 10:598
    
    	Sounds like the Squeelers are worried about losing the game on the 
    27th.
    	I keep reading in the newspaper and on the radio that the Browns
    are said to have the best chance at beating the Squeelers at home!
    
    	WOOF!
    
35.860Reading on the radio? Must be brailleHBAHBA::HAASGandhi Cactus JuiceWed Dec 09 1992 11:030
35.861Just more whooffingPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFWed Dec 09 1992 14:107
>Reading on the radio? Must be braille 

  Hal has also been known to aquire his indisputable knowledge of 
  pro football from such things as strange voices while he's dreaming,
  oiuji boards and dogs barking.

	Keith
35.862HE IS BACK!JUNCO::WHITEHAIRWed Dec 09 1992 14:5911
    
    	Funny you should mention that dream Keith...I was thinking about
    it myself the other day.  Since that night, a new feeling has come
    over me....a sence of something insperational, something that says
    Bernie will do it.  He told me he was ready....I swear it was real.
    It will probably be the closest I'll ever get to the hero of the 
    Browns.....  Bernie Kosar - QB - CLEVELAND BROWNS - #1
    
    
    	WOOF!
    
35.863QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksWed Dec 09 1992 16:261
      I thought the hero of the browns was/is Jim Brown?
35.864TORREY::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanWed Dec 09 1992 16:435
    
    Jim Brown is the hero of the Browns because he's the only one who knows
    how to handle people who wear dresses.
    
    Brews
35.865CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Dec 09 1992 17:078
>    Jim Brown is the hero of the Browns because he's the only one who knows
>    how to handle people who wear dresses.
    
Some of the BEST football footage I have EVER seen is footage of
Jim Brown and Sam Huff going head to head.    Unbelievable....


'Saw
35.866;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 09 1992 18:0512
    
>>    Jim Brown is the hero of the Browns because he's the only one who knows
>>    how to handle people who wear dresses.
>    
> Some of the BEST football footage I have EVER seen is footage of
> Jim Brown and Sam Huff going head to head.    Unbelievable....
    
    Sam Huff wore a dress?  That was my opinion, but I didn't expect to
    hear it from a Giants' fan...
    
    glenn
    
35.867CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Dec 09 1992 18:2411
>    Sam Huff wore a dress?  That was my opinion, but I didn't expect to
>    hear it from a Giants' fan...
    
Huff was one of the all-time GREATEST LBs ever to play the game, and the
GREATEST in the era before Nitschke and Butkus.

Huff ALWAYS manhandled Brown....


;^)    

35.869PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Wed Dec 09 1992 18:3514
    HAL, 
    
    just what recreational Pharmaceuticals ARE you doin'???????????
    
    STEELERS worried about the mistakes from the lake???  HAHAHAHAHA,
    thanks fer the funny, HAL.
    
    Bernice hates Three Rivers cause his high heels keep breaking off here.
    
    Just who is saying that the 'Spots have a chance in Pittsburgh???? 
    SOmeone who don't know sh_t, that's who.
    
    JaKe
    
35.871CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsWed Dec 09 1992 18:4311
NO, but I've been remiss today.


For like the millionth time, let's cut the baloney about Bernie Kosar
wearing a dress, high heels or whatever.....


Okay?  Okay.


'Saw
35.874respect...Kosar, Kelly, Marino, Elway, Young...ESKIMO::WHITEHAIRWed Dec 09 1992 18:5111
    
    	It doesn't hurt me in any way when you all want to tease about
    Bernie...it just shows how much you would really want him on your
    team.  I can take it and I'm sure he can too.  
    	I have alot of respect for Moon but anyone from Squeelers 
    contry has got to prove himself first before I'll give him any 
    credit.
    
    	
    	WOOF!
    
35.875MKFSA::LONGchoosy drinkers choose JifWed Dec 09 1992 18:574
	I'm certain that getting Hal's respect is right at the top of
	Neil O'Donnell's Christmas list.

	Bill
35.876PFSVAX::JACOBBack to work, still in pain!Wed Dec 09 1992 19:014
    Hey HAL, whaddya think of Barry Foster?????????
    
    JaKe
    
35.877PFSVAX::JACOBPC is not fer METhu Dec 10 1992 13:477
    Whadda day here in the 'Burgh.
    
    3 inches of snow on the ground, and 9-12 more forecast.  Looks like it
    could be an interesting night if'n I cain make it in later.
    
    JaKe
    
35.878Thanks in advanceRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Dec 10 1992 17:011
    Was Neil ever put on IR officialy ???? FFL NEEDS TO KNOW.
35.8796 inches and still fallingPFSVAX::JACOBPC is not fer METhu Dec 10 1992 18:214
    Neil O'Donnell is NOT on IR, nor will he be put on it.
    
    JaKe
    
35.880SOLANA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanThu Dec 10 1992 21:166
>PFSVAX::JACOB "PC is not fer ME"                      4 lines  10-DEC-1992 15:21
>                        -< 6 inches and still falling >-    
    
My condolences to Mrs. Jake.
    
    Brews
35.881ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Dec 11 1992 01:216
    Brews,
    
    As a mod you should be hiding notes like .880, not writing them :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.882PFSVAX::JACOBPC is not fer MEFri Dec 11 1992 03:125
    Well, we're up to 11-1/2 inches now and still piling up.  Forecast is
    16-24 inches before the end comes about.
    
    JaKe
    
35.883Bubby's bustedPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 14 1992 14:435
  After yesterday's game, it looks like the Steelers are a much different
  team with O'Donell out of the lineup. I think the Steeler's need to look
  for a QB in the upcoming draft.

	Keith    
35.884PFSVAX::JACOBPC is not fer MEMon Dec 14 1992 14:5715
    Two words sum up the STEELERS loss to the Bears yesterday:
    
    Bubby
    
    Brister!!!
    
    The STEELERS, who, to quote BIll Cowher, had "Won ugly" the pasted 4
    games, lost VERY ugly to the Bears yesterday.  The Bears were playing
    with tons of emotion, since it was Mike Singletary's last home game,
    but the Steelers should have keelt the Bears.
    
    Stats and stuff later
    
    JaKe
    
35.885TORREY::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanMon Dec 14 1992 14:596
    
    I read yesterday that the Bears had never lost at home to a team whose
    city's name began with the letter "P."  Included Pitts, Philly, and one
    other from the old NFL days (Pottstown?).
    
    Brews
35.886SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Dec 14 1992 15:5147
    
    
    	All I can say is, a huge storm hits here in NE and by a miracle,
    a local station carried the game and spared me of watching the Jets
    and Colts.  Biggo mistake.
    
    	For only about the second time this year, I was treated to a
    Steeler game on TV.  As I have said before, the Steelers have failed
    to deliever against even .500 teams and yesterday was no different.
    
    	Jake, although Bubby stunk really bad, he had nothing to do with
    the Bears crossing the goal line.  The Steeler D played fairly well
    at times and sipped for most of the game with a team that has no
    offense at all.  Sound familiar?
    
    	I was amused though at the taunting the Steelers managed to do
    while getting their collective butts kicked.  Nothing better than
    seeing a bunch of taunters that can't back it up.  If this is what I've
    been missing for the last 12 weeks, I'm glad I didn't waste any Sunday
    afternoons watching these guys try to imitate a intimidating defense.
    I think they did manage to scare or intimidate a couple of small
    children in the stands though.  Really classless.  At least when Joe
    Greene got tossed, he did some tossing, but Nickerson?
    
    	Overall, I can't figure why the Steelers gave up so quickly on the
    run.  Also, they had decent success over the middle passing the ball
    but then continued to throw the out patterns that require a great arm
    and excellent timing...something that Brister doesn't have.  Then,
    if Bubby wasn't bouncing the balls or throwing them 10 feet over the
    recievers heads, the ends were dropping them!  Bubby has got to go.
    Pay the guys salary and send this moron packing!
    
    	It really is amazing that a team as inept as this one appeared to
    be yesterday could have 10 wins.  They have absolutely no offense once
    Foster is stopped.  Their defense is real suspect if you can handle the
    stunts.  Shoot, they actually made the Bears look good yesterday and 
    the Bears had lost 6 straight!
    
    	Amazing what it can do for you to have a schedule that is made up
    of sub .500 teams to play.
    
    	And in spite of this exercise some would call football, I am still
    and always be a Steeler fan.  But somehow I doubt that the Steelers
    will go very far come playoff time.
    
    	bill..g.
    
35.887CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Mon Dec 14 1992 16:117
Rod Woodson quote about the game:

"why be worried.  You act like it's the Super Bowl.."

WOODSON set the tone for the game, fumbling the opening kickoff...

JD
35.888CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsMon Dec 14 1992 16:218
I think WVIT-TV30 (who carried the game) lets the fans vote on which
telecast to carry.

22 in Springfield had the Pats, and by rights, 30 would have had the Jets.
But, I guess the fans wanted to see the Steelers....


'Saw
35.889bubby suks...DECWET::METZGERThis space being flea bombed..Mon Dec 14 1992 18:2118
Bubby bites the big one...I can't believe Parcells was saying the recievers 
should have come up with a bunch of those balls. Bubble was hanging his receivers
out to dry with his high passes that required a full extension to approach..while
the db is just waiting to undercut the recievers going up for the pass....

If I was a WR in that game I wouldda told bubble to throw the ball to hisself 
next play...I'm surprised the steelers didn't lose a few wr's permanently 
during that game...

Do ya think his mom was proud of him in the stands watching him lead the team to
defeat? If O'Donnell was in that game the steelers would have won. It was
mightly easy for the bears to shut down the run after they realized that bubble
couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. That's why the coaches had to resort to 
sideline patterns. at least when he missed high the ball would only sail into the
stands not into some db's arms waiting down field...

Metz
35.890PFSVAX::JACOBPC is not fer MEMon Dec 14 1992 18:5726
    Brews, the STEELERS are 0-11 in Chicago dating back to 1934.
    
    >>	Jake, although Bubby stunk really bad, he had nothing to do with
    >>the Bears crossing the goal line.  The Steeler D played fairly well
    >>at times and sipped for most of the game with a team that has no
    >>offense at all.  Sound familiar?
    
    You put the defense on the field fer as long as they were yesterday,
    with the STEELERS doing multiple "3 and outs", and eventually, you're
    going to give up some drives.The defense gave up two long drives, one
    of 77 yards, and the other of 80 yards.  Basically, it was a team
    effort to lose this bad, but Bubby headed it.  
    
    Brister made Cowher's decision to go with O'Donnell as the #1 QB look
    as good as it ever has.  This game looked like vintage Brister-type
    play.
    
    Brister sucked, as usual, plus they DID have a lot of dropped passes.  
    Hail, the recievers had more balls go throught their hands than an Army
    doctor in the enlistment center does on a busy day.
    
    I didn't see all of the game, and what I did made me want to puke. 
    Nickerson's tirades were uncalled fer.
    
    JaKe
    
35.891A Ballet Of Bubby BunglesPEAKS::WOESTEHOFFMon Dec 14 1992 19:207
  Bubble Butt Bubby Bombed out Big against the Big Bad Bears. His Bumbled
  Bombs couldn't hit the Broad side of a Barn(well, maybe the top) and left
  his receivers Bruised, Broken, Black and Blue. 

  nuf said,

	Keith
35.892SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Dec 15 1992 15:4038
    
    re: jake
    
    	yea but remember those glory days especially in '76.  In that
    case and many others, the defense rose on occasion after occasion to
    shut down the other team even though the offense was basically 3
    and out for much of the stretch when Bradshaw was hurt.  On Sunday,
    the defense could of risen and proved itself that indeed it is one
    of the best in the AFC, but they fell flat.  They couldn't muster
    a turnover which frankly has me wondering if the Steelers can win
    without the defense getting the ball in the endzone or a simple INT.
    Especially yesterday too with the Bears.  Very average team with a
    below average offense yet they controlled the ball for most of the
    game.
    
    	I really feel sorry for some of the Steeler faithful because they
    have been given a team doing it with mirrors.  They have only a
    slightly better than average QB and absolutely no backup.  They don't
    have a really decent wideout and especially one that has proven he can
    come up with a catch in traffic.  They have a decent RB, and they have
    a decent pair of TE's if they would only throw the ball to more than
    2 times a game.  Come playoff time, folks are going to see what a
    sub-par .500 schedule gets you.  I would of rather seen the Steelers
    stink a little more this year and get another good draft pick to build
    upon, but then again, the way they have managed their previous picks,
    they don't need a first round pick.
    
    	Now instead of building some steam going into the playoffs, they
    have to deal with Bubby running the show.  Next two games will be
    tough especially since both of the remaining teams are looking for
    playoff berths and will need a win.
    
    	I'll also be curious to see how Mike Merriweather plays coming back
    to the the 'burg after his less then cordial leave from the Steelers.
    
    
    bill..g
    
35.893PFSVAX::JACOBDenver's QB Shuffle = Curly ShuffleTue Dec 15 1992 18:4930
    
    bill..g
    
    I agree with ya fer the mosted part.  The defense has played very well
    at times.  Sunday they played well, but gave up the long drives.
    
    The Steeler defenses in the '70s, though, particularly 1976, was an
    established defense.  The defense this year HAS at times, got it done
    with smoke and mirrors, while at other times, played VERY well.  They
    are playing a new defensive system from last year, and I think they've
    done decent overall.  They rose to the occasion in KC, came back and
    played a good second half in Buffalo, and played well enuf to give the
    offense the ball and make the comebacks against the Oileers, twice.
    
    IMHO, the game Sunday, especially the 4th qtr, looked like the games
    lasted year where they just cain't get up the energy to stop the
    opposing offense, cause they've spent almost 2/3 of the game on the
    field already.
    
    I don't expect the team to go very far in the playoffs, unless
    O'Donnell returns and is in the form he was in for most of the first 9
    games of the season.  Brister doesn't have the filberts to carry this
    team thru a game against a good defense.
    
    IMHO, the Bears could've beat almost anyone Sunday, with it being Mike
    Singletary's lasted game in Chitown.  It just coincided with the
    Steelers being there, unfortunately.
    
    JaKe
    
35.894METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 18:562
Which year was it that Bradshaw was injured and the Steelers defense "threw"
4 shutouts in 5 games or something like that.
35.895PFSVAX::JACOBDenver's QB Shuffle = Curly ShuffleTue Dec 15 1992 18:594
    I think that was 1976.
    
    JaKe
    
35.896PFSVAX::JACOBDenver's QB Shuffle = Curly ShuffleTue Dec 15 1992 19:2016
    Now, my memory is a little bit fuzzy, and John Hendry ain't here
    anymore, so I gots a couple of questions fer younze.
    
    What was the lasted year that Bradshaw played???Was it 1984??? 
    
    If so, was that the last time, before this year that the Steelers won
    the AFC Central??
    
    That was the year that Cliff Stoudt  took them to 8-1, on the strengths
    of the defense and the running game, and then proceeded to throw bounce
    pass after bounce pass, and interceptions until Bradshaw came back for
    1 half of football versus the Jets and threw his last two TD passes,
    lifting the team to a victory and the playoffs, where they lost.
    
    JaKe
     
35.897SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Dec 15 1992 19:2944
    
    	re: defense
    
    	It was '76 and many including myself believe this unit was the 
    greatest defensive unit to ever suit up.  That year they also set a
    record for fewest points allowed while Franco and Rocky both eclipsed
    the 1000 yard barrier.  But despite this incredible showing, Franco and
    Blier were hurt in the first playoff game (I believe) and the Steelers
    had to face Oakland in the AFC Championship in Oakland.  Even with
    Bradshaw back, without their main offensive weapons, they were toast
    for the soon-to-be crowned Superbowl camps the Oakland Raiders.
    	
    	Here's the breakdown of their schedule in '76.
    
    	game 1:		at Oakland	Oakland 31 Steelers 28  Oakland
    					scores 17 points in last 3 minutes
    					of 4th quarter off turnovers.
    	game 2:		at Pitt		Steelers 31 Cleveland 14
    	game 3:		at Pitt		Patriots 30 Steelers 27  Steeler
    					blow 20-9 lead with 6 fumbles in
    					1st half.
    	game 4:		at Minny	Minny 17    Steelers 6
    	game 5:		at Clev.	Browns 18   Steelers 16, Bradshaw
    					hurt.
    	game 6:		at Pitt		Pitt 23     Cincy 6
    	game 7:		at NY giants	Pitt 27     Giants 0
    	game 8:		at Pitt		Pitt 23	    Chargers 0
    	game 9:		at KC		Pitt 45	    Chiefs   0
    	game 10:	at Pitt		Pitt 14	    Miami    3
    	game 11:	at Pitt		Pitt 32	    Oilers  16
    	game 12:	at Cincy	Pitt 7	    Cincy    3
    	game 13:	at Pitt	        Pitt 42	    Bucs     0
    	game 14		at Oilers	Pitt 21	    Oilers   0
    
    	Playoffs:	at Colts	Pitt 40	    Colts    14  Franco and
    					Blier hurt.  Bradshaw complets 78%
    					of his attempts.
    
    			at Oakland	Oakland 24   Steelers 7  although
    					Steeler D held Oakland to only 220
    					total yards.
    
    
    bill..g.
35.898Hoping they get a REAL wide receiverPFSVAX::JACOBDenver's QB Shuffle = Curly ShuffleTue Dec 15 1992 19:3710
    I just hope that come draft time nexted year, the Steelers make a deal
    or two and move up in the draft and get themselves a receiver who cain
    hang onto the ball when it's put in his breadbasket.  
    
    Also, they have to find a receiver who cain be a true deep threat.  The
    Steelers longest completion of the year is only 51 yards, that coming
    on an alley-ooop play in the second game of the year.
    
    JaKe
    
35.899PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Dec 15 1992 20:189
  '76 was really an incredible performance as reflected in .897. Thanks
  fer postin it.

  Another incredible stat that most people don't remember is that during one
  of their superbowl years (maybe 1975), the combined rushing yardage against
  the Steelers in all post season games was less than 100 yards and one of
  the teams they beat had the Juice playin for em. 

	Keith
35.900got it!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeWed Dec 16 1992 00:0314
    
    Yabbut 2 years later I got (honorably) discharged when I completed
    my enlistment!  THAT YEAR WAS THE GREATEST!
    
    I had to say that, I wanted #.900
    
    ;^)
    
    we now resume to out regularly schedule spit swap
    
    I remain,
    gladly a civilian!
    Kev
    
35.901SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Dec 16 1992 15:3948
    
    re: -2
    
    	O.K. I'm looking it up.  
    
    	'72 was the first Steeler playoff year.  They beat Oakland and then
    lost to Miami (mainly on that fake punt) in the AFC final.
    
    	'73 they were bounced in the first game at Oakland but only gave up
    65 rushing yards.
    
    	'74 they bet the Bills in round one and then Oakland in the AFC
    final.  They gave up 100 yards to the Bills (OJ was 15-49), 29 to 
    Oakland and then in the Superbowl, 17 to the Vikes.  So the total 
    rushing yards was 146 on 62 attempts in 3 games...not bad!
    
    	'75 they beat the Colts and then Oakland and then Dallas.  Total
    rushing yards for each game: 82, 93, 108.
    
    	'76 they beat the Colts and then lost to Oakland.  Total rushing
    yards for each game: 71, 157.
    
    	'77 they lost to the Broncos in round one.  Rushing yards allowed,
    103.
    
    	'78 they beat Denver, beat Houston, beat Dallas.  Rushing yards 
    allowed each game: 87, 72, 141.
    
    	'79 they beat Miami, Houston, and LA Rams.  Rushing yards allowed
    each game: 25, 24, 107.  Total rushing yards was 156 on 73 attempts!!
    
    
    	So, '74 and '79 were the best years at stopping the rush.  Geez,
    in '79 during the first two games, the average per carry was 1.1!!
    Unbelievable!!  Campbell had 17 attempts for 15 yards in the '79
    playoff game!  Talk about shutting someone down!  In the previous 
    years playoff, he didn't do much better gaining only 62 yards on 22
    attempts.
    
    	Hey, I have the stats for any game the steelers played during the
    '70's, so if you have a question about any of those games, just post
    it here and I'll get you the answer if it is in the stats.  Hey, the
    book was one of those your Mom orders that at the time is kindof stupid
    but now some 10+ years latter it is pretty neat to have around!!  I
    guess that's what Mom's are for!
    
    	bill..g.
    
35.902BillCUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Wed Dec 16 1992 15:598
Bill -

IN the 79 game vs. Houston, if I remember, it was played
in an ice storm.  Pastorini was either hurt or in bad
shape.   They had no offense.  Still a great defense
display, that's for sure...

JD
35.903SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Dec 16 1992 17:4330
    
    	Which '79 game?  The Steelers beat Houston 2 straight years.  They
    beat them druing the '78 SEASON where the game was actually played
    in Jan. of '79, and they beat them again during the '79 SEASON when
    again, the game was played in Jan. of '80.
    
    	In the first game (78 season, played in 79), the Steelers had
    379 total yards on offense to the Oilers 142.  Yes, the Oilers only
    managed 142 TOTAL yards!  As for the next year, the Oilers managed
    227 total yards to the Steelers 356.  The second game was the more
    memorable because that is the game where Renfro caught that pass in
    the endzone that was ruled no touchdown because he didn't have both
    feet inbounds.
    
    	Both games were marked somewhat by the weather, but it goes both
    ways.  The Steelers racked up a lot of offense on the same playing 
    field as the Oilers.  Holding Campbell to negative yards was no
    small feet no matter what the conditions seeing that Campbell was
    considered the best back in the league at the time.
    
    	Looking back over the stats, one thing is apparent during those
    last 4 years of the 70's which is Bradshaw had amazingly great games
    during the playoffs.  Some of these games were superhuman.  Over 70%
    completion rate (and we're not talking throwing 5 yarders to a back)
    and complete consistency.  Purely looking at the stats, Bradshaw really
    had some hall of fame years there.  I guess that's why he is in
    Canton.
    
    	bill..g.
    
35.904PFSVAX::JACOBDenver's QB Shuffle = Curly ShuffleWed Dec 16 1992 18:4910
    The one year, they beat the Oilers 34-5, in an ice storm.  I was at
    that game and it was 31-3 at the half.  The second half was boring from
    a football standpoint, but it was great fer us inebriated fans in the
    stands who was doing some big time celebrating.  
    
    The game with the Renfro "non-catch" was played in cold weather, but it
    was dry as a bone.
    
    JaKe
    
35.905BillCUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Wed Dec 16 1992 19:396
Bill -
Wasn't lessening the effort - just trying to remember
which game it was - the Steelers were truley awesome,
and better than Houston.    

JD
35.906QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterWed Dec 16 1992 22:034
    
    Heres hoping the squeelers win in minnihaha...
    
    BG
35.907PFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanThu Dec 17 1992 00:428
    >>Heres hoping the squeelers win in minnihaha...
    
    Minor nit, the game is in Three Rivers Concrete Bowl-a-drome.
    
    Still, sure do want those STEELERS to win.
    
    JaKe
    
35.908QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 17 1992 13:531
      If the Steelers lose,  then it must be QB related, eh Mike?
35.909AXIS::ROBICHAUDScott...NOT! JeffCarlsonIsOurHeroThu Dec 17 1992 14:588
    	Boy do I remember the year the Steelers crushed the Soilers.
    I loaded up on Houston that day.  That was the year Dan and his
    flak jacket beat the Patsies in Foxboro.  The highlight of the Pats 
    game was when someone threw a hibachi at soon to be departing Chuck
    Faribanks as he made his way up the ramp after the game.  Hey, maybe
    it was the Deliverance Dude who heaved the hibachi?
    
    				/Don
35.910CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway NFL Baby of the Year WinnerThu Dec 17 1992 17:584
I'd say Tim that the reason Pitt lost had more to do with the fact that Foster
was held to 25 yards than plain ole Bubby badness.....Also any defense that let's
an old crepid unit like the bears score 30 has got some problems.

35.911PFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanThu Dec 17 1992 18:4922
    
>>I'd say Tim that the reason Pitt lost had more to do with the fact that Foster
>>was held to 25 yards than plain ole Bubby badness.....
    
    IMHO, the Steelers gave up on the running game WAY to early.  After
    giving up on it, they had to rely on the Bubster's arm and,
    unfortunately, decisions on what passes to throw.  I'd have felt a
    helluva lot more comfortable with O'Donnell in there, cause Bubby
    telegraphs ALL of his passes.  Looking off  receivers is not one of his
    strong points.  Hence, it seemed he was throwing into crowds all day
    long.
    
>>    						Also any defense that let's
>>an old crepid unit like the bears score 30 has got some problems.
    
    My memory may be horrible, but weren't 14 or so of those points set up
    by turnovers?????  
    
    Schnort Schitt Schlepps
    
    JaKe
    
35.912QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 17 1992 19:234
      I was refering to the game this coming weekend...
    
      Minni has a better defense than d-bears.  Could be a long day for
    Bubbles.
35.913Read p-name if you need clariification Tim ..CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway NFL Baby of the Year WinnerThu Dec 17 1992 19:246
Could be Jake, I didn't see the game but I do know the Bears aren't a 30 points
a game team....

Tim was fishin' and got hooked hisself.....

;^)
35.914QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 17 1992 20:157
      Huh?  Your p_name has no basis!;^)
    
      It's not bubbles were talking about here, ya know the guy who
    complains about being 2nd string when he is maybe 3rd string caliber at
    best!
    
      Your just mad 'cause you lost that p-name bet with BG;^)
35.915QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterThu Dec 17 1992 21:167
    Yea Mikey..  What Tim said !!!
    
    
     Jake,  I'm glad its in squeeler-ville...  Give `em a better chance to
    win and set up the Pack with a chance at the `offs
    
    BG
35.916DECWET::METZGERThis space being flea bombed..Thu Dec 17 1992 22:2711
It's easy to stop Foster when you have 9 guys on the line of scrimmage. Da Bears
did just that and other teams will continue do do it with bubble at QB. When
your qb can't hit the ground with his spit then the other teams are going to gear
up to stop the run..

the squeelers aaaare in for a long road with bubble at QB...and a lot of hurt
WR's if he keeps leaving them out dry with his 11 feet above the ground passes...


Metz
35.917Steelers now 10-5, in need of a jump startPFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanSun Dec 20 1992 22:2814
    Steelers lost to the Bikes today, 6-3, sounds more like a baseball
    score.  I have no idea what happened in the game as I was on call this
    weekend and spent all day on site, only able to listen to about 3
    minutes of the game, total.
    
    Anybody wanna provide a DECENT synopsis of the game.  Foster run
    good???  Brister show up, or was he still throwing hot air balloons
    that just kept rising and rising and, well, ya get the picture.
    
    Oh well, guess either 11-5 or 10-6 won't be too bad fer a team that was
    expected to win 5 or 6 games this year.
    
    JaKe
    
35.918ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Dec 21 1992 02:316
    Yeah a baseball score between Minnesota and Pittsburgh, sort of like a
    score that the Twins vs. Pirates might have come up with. Woops I
    forgot, it was the Braves and Twins in the 1991 WS.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.919ANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Mon Dec 21 1992 14:5610
    It was a game that showed how inept the two starting QB's were.  The
    Vikes turned the ball over three times in Pittsburgh territory and
    muffed a FG after driving to the two-yard line.  The Vikes should have
    walked away with an easy win by a couple of TD's.  Allen ran for over
    170 yards and Foster had 119 before getting hurt at the very end.  I
    did feel a little bad for Bubby though, he's was getting pounded by the
    Vikes D all day long.  He's got to be a hurting pup this morning.
    
    
    Spud
35.920A week late on this onePFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanMon Dec 21 1992 18:2145
Scoring Summary
                1       2       3       4       T
STEELERS        0       3       0       3       6
Chicago         3       10      7       10      30

Chi--Butler 37 yd FG
Chi--Lewis 3 yd run (Butler PAT)
Chi--Butler 26 yd FG
STEELERS--Anderson 38 yd FG
Chi--N.Anderson 15 yd pass from Harbaugh(Butler PAT)
Chi--Butler 38 yd FG
STEELERS-Anderson 38 yd FG
Chi--N.Anderson 6 yd run(Butler PAT)

TEAM STATS:
STEELERS                                Chicago
10              1st Downs               20
15-35           Rushes-Yds              44-212
105             Passing Yds             71
14-31-2         Comp-Att-Int            11-21-0
5-38            Sacked-Yds Lost         4-19
6-40            Punts                   5-43
3-2             Fumbles-Lost            0-0
7-80            Penalties-Yds           4-31
22:01           Time of Possession      37:59

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
STEELERS--Foster 12-25, Brister 2-10, Thompson 1-0
Chicago---N.Anderson 11-56, Morgan 2-51, Lewis 16-47, Muster 8-27, Harbaugh
          3-16, Green 3-12, Gentry 1-3

PASSING:
STEELERS--Brister 14-31 2 INT, 143 yds, 0 td
Chicago---Harbaugh 11-21 0 Int, 90 yds, 1 TD

RECEIVING:
STEELERS--Cooper 3-58, Graham 3-30, Foster 2-10, Thompson 2-10, Mills 1-20,
          Hoge 1-7, Jorden 1-6.
Chicago---Davis 3-41, Jennings 2-15, Muster 2-6, N.Anderson 1-15, 
          Wright 1-8, Gentry 1-5, Lewis 1-0.

JaKe

35.921STEELERS now 10-5, MUST win nexted week fer playoofsPFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanMon Dec 21 1992 18:2241
Scoring Summary

                1       2       3       4       T
Vikings         0       0       0       6       6
STEELERS        0       3       0       0       3

STEELERS--Anderson 23 yd FG
Vikings---Reveiz 38 yd FG
Vikings---Reveiz 36 yd FG

TEAM STATS:
Vikings                                 STEELERS
18              1st Downs               17
44-216          Rushes-Yds              31-158
121             Passing Yds             130
7-18-0          Comp-Att-Int            13-22-0
1-10            Sacked-Yds Lost         3-30
3-54            Punts                   6-38
3-3             Fumbles-Lost            3-1
6-64            Penalties-Yds           8-58
28:27           Time of Possession      31:33

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Vikings--Allen 33-172, Craig 5-27, A.Carter 1-14, Salisbury 3-4, Henderson
         2-(-1)
STEELERS--Foster 24-118, Thompson 3-30, Stone 1-7, Hoge 2-3, Brister 1-0.

PASSING:
Vikings---Salisbury 7-17 0 Int 131 yds, 0 TD, Newsome 0-1
STEELERS--Brister 13-22 0 Int 160 yds, 0 TD

RECEIVING:
Vikings---A.Carter 4-64, Reed 2-56, Jordan 1-11.
STEELERS--Thompson 3-56, Mills 2-24, Foster 2-8, Graham 1-20, Cooper 1-20,
          Hoge 1-18, Davenport 1-7, Jorden 1-5, Stone 1-2.

JaKe



35.922Injury reportPFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanTue Dec 22 1992 00:3314
    Neil O'Donnell practiced and ran with the STEELERs today, but
    tentatively, Brister is still slated to start Sunday, hopefully that
    will change later in the week.
    
    Carnell Lake, who originally was diagnosed as having sprained his ankle
    yesterday, actually has a minor bone break, but will play next week.
    
    Barry Foster's MRI on his back showed no damage, and Foster is slated
    to play nexted Sunday.
    
    Eric Green returned to practicing with the STEELERS today, and is also
    expected to play Sunday.
    
    JaKe
35.923SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Dec 22 1992 17:3711
    
    	Geez, just when your team needs this week to rest some of its
    key players, it appears that they will have to play them in order
    to get a little 'mo' going into the playoffs.
    
    	I'd sit Lake, Foster, and O'Donnell and not risk further injury.
    But then again, one would hate to go into the playoffs with a 3 game
    losing streak!!
    
    bill..g.
    
35.924METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 22 1992 17:5310
It is more than that. If SD wins and the Steelers lose than the
Steelers do not get a first round bye in the playoffs. You can bet
they want a week off. 

Actually if SD and Steelers are both 11-5 who wins that tiebreaker??
What if SD, KC, Steelers are all 10-6. KC wins the division, and
who wins the KC, Pittsburgh tiebreaker??

The Crazy Met
35.925QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksTue Dec 22 1992 19:285
      Pitt would beat out KC since they beat 'em earleir this year.
    
      Thats what I saw in the paper this weekend.
    
      Tim
35.926METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 22 1992 19:353
What about SD and Pitt??

The Crazy Met
35.927NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Dec 22 1992 19:449
    
    I read that if the Steelers win, they get the first-round bye
    regardless of what anyone else does.  I guess this means that they win
    all tie-breakers for home field too, except with Buffalo.  I think it's 
    because of their AFC record-- Steelers have been beaten by Green Bay, 
    Chicago, and Minnesota from the NFC.
    
    glenn
    
35.928METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 22 1992 19:4919
Buffalo wins a tiebreaker with the Steelers because they beat them during
the season. 

To continue:

If Miami, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, SD all finish up at 11-5:

Pittsburgh, Miami, SD win the divisions.
Pittsburgh gets home field throughout the playoffs since Buffalo
would get in as a wildcard and a division winner always plays at
home against a wildcard team.  So Buffalo can end up anywhere from
home field for the entire playoffs or a wildcard with the first game
at home.  Given that I think Buffalo will beat Houston. Buffalo has
a lot more riding on the game than Houston does. I don't think Houston 
can get a home game for the first round even if they win since I believe
they lose a tiebreaker with Miami.

The Crazy Met
35.929CELTIK::JACOBBush Cursed???I'd Haiti to think so!!Wed Dec 23 1992 12:0610
    I read that if the STEELERS end up in a 3 way tie fer best overall
    record, even if Buffalo is in that group, theSTEELERS would get home
    field THROUGHOUT the playoffs.  This is based on the fact that if 3 or
    more teams are tied, they throw out the head to head tiebreaker, and go
    with conference record as the first tiebreakethe STEELERS, with a win
    on Sunday, would have a 10-2 Conference record, better than the others
    by a game or two or three.
    
    JaKe
    
35.930Buffalo might be wild cardHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortWed Dec 23 1992 13:096
There's another way for the Burghers to win home court. If'n they end up
in a 3 way tie with Miami and Buffalo, then Miami would win their
division, making Buffalo the wild card team which puts them on the road
for the divisional playoff games.

TTom
35.931MKFSA::LONG&quot;just keep it between the lines&quot;Wed Dec 23 1992 14:1111
	re: .923

	I'm with you.  I'd hate to see the three you mentioned get hurt
	in the last week of the season before the playoffs start,

	BUT,

	seein' how we're talkin' 'bout da brownies, I'd hate even more
	to loose this game.

	Bill
35.932It's a 'burgh thing!MKFSB::LONG&quot;just keep it between the lines&quot;Mon Dec 28 1992 17:4514
    Guess JaKe must be on vaca.  Steelers clinch homefield throughout
    the playoffs with a woopin' of the Brownies yesterday.  
    
    Wish I had the stats.  I understand that O'Donnell did not play,
    Green was back and Foster gained another >100 yds.
    
    Steelers get a bye for the firsted week.  Another week off can 
    only help O'Donnell.  
    
    Ah yes, the rivers are starting to ice up, snow is flying...
    It's playoff time again for the Steelers.
    
    
    Bill
35.933STEELERS finish 11-5, Homefield throughout the playoffsPFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanMon Dec 28 1992 18:3546
Bill, ask and ye shall receive!!
    
                1       2       3       4       T
Cleveland       0       3       7       3       13
STEELERS        7       10      3       3       23

SCORING SUMMARY
STEELERS--Foster 7 yd run(Anderson PAT)
Cleveland--Stover 22yd FG
STEELERS--Jorden 2 yd pass from Brister(Anderson PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 36 yd FG
Cleveland--M.Jackson 38 yd pass from Tomczak(Stover PAT)
STEELERS--Anderson 29 yd FG
Cleveland--Stover 22 yd FG
STEELERS--Anderson 28 yd FG

TEAM STATS:
Cleveland                                       STEELERS
17              First Downs                     20
27-120          Rushes-Yds                      30-105
173             Passing Yds                     203
13-22-1         Compl-Att-Int                   18-25-0
1-9             Sacked-Yds Lost                 5-20
3-39            Punts                           4-40
2-2             Fumbles-Lost                    0-0
2-15            Penalties-Yds                   6-79
28:28           Time of Possession              31:32

INDIVIDUAL STATS:
RUSHING:
Cleveland--Hoard 7-55, Mack 10-32, Metcalf 7-25, Kosar 2-4, Tomczak 1-4
STEELERS---Foster 26-103, Stone 1-3, Hoge 1-2, Thompson 1-(-1), Brister 1-(-2)

PASSING:
Cleveland--Kosar 5-7 0 int's, 0 TD's, 41 yds, Tomczak 8-15 1 Int 1 TD, 141 yds
STEELERS---Brister 18-25 0 Int's 1 TD 223 yds

RECEIVING:
Cleveland--M.Jackson 4-85, Bavaro 4-61, Smith 2-28, Hoard 1-11, Metcalf 1-4
           Mack 1-(-7)
STEELERS---Stone 5-61, Mills 3-43, Graham 3-24, Thompson 2-33, Hoge 2-31,
           Foster 2-29, Jorden 1-2.


JaKe

35.934PFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanMon Dec 28 1992 18:3625
The STEELERS, by virtue of Houston beating Buffalo lasted night, have home
field advantage for however long they last in the playoffs.

Barry Foster came in second in the NFL in rushing this year, finishing behind
Emmitt Smith of the Cowboys.  Foster did tie Eric Dickerson's record of 12 
games of 100 yards or more rushing in a season.

Brister had the best game he's had in years, in beating the Brown(spot)s(tm),
and failed to throw any "receiver killer" floating passes all day.

The STEELER defense in 1991 gave up 344 points, or 21.5 per game.  The 1992
STEELERS gave up 226 points, or 14.1 points per game.

Five of the STEELERS wins came by ten points or less.

Bill Cowher has again stated that "Neil O'Donnell is our quarterback."  Mean-
ing that we will in all probabilities see O'Donnell when the Steelers host
their first playoff game in ~2 weeks.  Yaaaaaaaaay!!!!

The STEELERS will host San Francisco, New Orleans, Buffalo, New England, San
Diego, Houston, Clevescum, and Cincinnati next season.  They will play on the 
road at Atlanta, the LA Rams, Miami, Denver, Seattle, Clevescum, Houston, and 
Cincinnati. (The Buffalo and Miami games may be switched)

JaKe
35.935PFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanMon Dec 28 1992 18:4816
    Brister started out the game 0 fer 2, but both were perfect passes
    which Jeff Graham and Eric Green just dropped.  Brister then rattled
    off 11 straight completions in the half, and they weren't just little
    dink passes.  A couple were perfect sideline passes for third down
    conversions.  Now, personally, I cain't stand the thought of Brister in
    a playoff game, although the last playoff game the STEELERS were in, he
    played a good game against the Donks, BUT, if O'Donnell comes out in
    two weeks and looks like crap, Cowher should consider throwing Brister
    in as a reliever type QB.
    
    IMHO, the STEELERS, although I'd like to imagine it turning out
    different, probably won't go too far in the playoffs.  BUT, I sure as
    hell hope they suprize EVERYONE and beat the snot out of whoever they
    play.
    
    JaKe
35.936METSNY::francusMets in '93Mon Dec 28 1992 18:505
JaKe,

here's hoping that in this case your wishes are not fulfilled.

The Crazy Met
35.937Foster?CSC32::J_HENSONFaster than a speeding ticketMon Dec 28 1992 19:146
The ESPN guys said that Foster took himself out of yesterday's game
because he was hurt.  He later went back in to try to get his 100
yards (which he did).  What's the deal?  Is Foster hurt?  If so, how
badly?

Jerry
35.938PFSVAX::JACOBCheez-Whiz, Choice of NathanMon Dec 28 1992 20:048
    Foster was having some back pain, from the back sprain he suffered
    against the Vikings the week before, and seeing the game was in hand(or
    so it seemed) he took himself out.
    
    He should be fine by the first playoff game the Steelers play.
    
    JaKe
    
35.939STEELERS 11-5, final(unofficial) StatsPFSVAX::JACOBTue Dec 29 1992 00:4694
		1       2       3       4               T  

STEELERS        58      90      51      100             299
Opponent        33      86      56      50              225


STEELER INDIVIDUAL SCORING:
		TD              FG              PAT     Total
Anderson        0               28              29      113
Foster          11              0               0       66
Stone           3               0               0       18
Cooper          3               0               0       18
E.Mills         3               0               0       18
E.Green         2               0               0       12 
Jorden          2               0               0       12
Davenport       1               0               0        6
Graham          1               0               0        6
Griffin         1               0               0        6
O'Donnell       1               0               0        6
Woodson         1               0               0        6
Hoge            1               0               0        6 
Thompson        1               0               0        6

                                               
TEAM STATS:                                               
							  
STEELERS                                Opponents
283             First Downs             266
518-2157        Rushes/yds              435-1841
2751            Passing Yds             2817
245-441-14      Comp-Att-Int            252-480-22
40-296          Sacked/yds lost         36-248
28-18           Fumbles-lost            34-21
106-941         Penalties-yards         104-813
31:49           Time of Possession      28:11


RUSHING:                                            

		Rushes          Yards           Avg
Foster          391            1689             4.32
Thompson         35             157             4.49
Hoge             40             150             3.75
Stone            12             118             9.83
Mills             1              20            20.00
Brister          10              16             1.60
O'Donnell        26               7             0.27
W.Williams        2               0             0.00
----------------------------------------------------
TOTALS          517            2157             4.21        


PASSING:                                                  
                Att	Comp	Int	%	Avg/com	   Yds	  TD   Int %
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
O'Donnell       313     185      9     59.1     12.35     2284    13    2.9
Brister         116      63      5     54.3     11.41      719     2    4.3
Royals            1       1      0    100.0     44.00       44     0    0.0
Foster            1       0      0      0.0      0.00        0     0    0.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL           431     249     14     57.8     12.24     3047    15    3.2
                           

                           
RECEIVING:

		No.     Yds     Avg.
Graham          49      711     14.5
Foster          36      324      9.0
Stone           33      499     15.1
Mills           30      383     12.8
Hoge            27      232      8.6
Thompson        22      278     12.6
E.Green         14      152     10.9
Cooper          16      197     12.3
Davenport        9      136     15.1
Didio            3       39     13.0
Jorden           6       28      4.7
W. Williams      1       44     44.0

JaKe                                                      












35.940momentous occasion! re: .939ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Dec 29 1992 04:366
    
    
    JaKe - caught without a p-name!!!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.941Squeelers out in the second round (their first game)QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 17:514
    Congrats to JaKe and the Squeelers...  Can't wait to get you girly mons
    in mile high nexted year...  The Donks will rip you apart !!
    
    BG
35.942PFSVAX::JACOBTue Dec 29 1992 19:278
    What BG, when the Doinks hire some loser to be head coach and he turns
    them from a near miss into total losers, with them finishing 5-11.
    
    STEELERS will cause Mr. Ed to look fer some EXPENSIVE dentures nexted
    year.
    
    JaKe
    
35.943Something like "Elway is GOD... Squeelers Suck !QUASER::HUNTERThe Often Quoted Big Game HunterTue Dec 29 1992 20:254
    Cain't hardly wait to invade the space in You and Mikey's P-Name
    area nexted year.
    
    BG
35.944PFSVAX::JACOBPgh. Paper back on Jan. 18th, FINALLY!!Sat Jan 02 1993 14:1311
    FWIW,
    
    The STEELERS will host an AFC playoff game for the first time since
    1983.
    
    In that game in 1983, they lost to the Dan Fouts led San Diego Chargers
    31-28.
    
    
    JaKe
    
35.945ACESMK::FRANCUSCubs in 93Sun Jan 03 1993 19:3712
    
    re:.944
    
    So?? :-)
    
    Anyways, the beer and the champagne were quite good New Year's Eve.
    
    JaKe, what time did you get home? by what time were you  uh,uh tipsy,
    yeah thats the word??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
35.946(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBPgh. Paper back on Jan. 18th, FINALLY!!Mon Jan 04 1993 18:386
    Got home just before midnight, had a sixer gone by 1am.
    
    re "So??"  I DID put FWIW in front of it, if it bored ya, T S .
    
    JaKe
    
35.947PFSVAX::JACOBSTEELERS.vs.Bills, no oil leaksMon Jan 04 1993 22:506
    STEELERS Head Coach, Bill COwher announced today that Neil O'Donnell
    WILL start the playoff game Saturday against the winners of the fixed
    game that was played in Buffalo yesterday, the Bills.
    
    JaKe
    
35.948And I hate the Bills !!QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonTue Jan 05 1993 18:516
    
     The Houstonchoke/Greatestcombackinnflhistory/Fixedgame Spells the end
    for the Squeelers...  Luckalo will kick the sh*t outta the Squeelers,
    Neil Odorko or not and I got a P-Name to say so, Fake !!
    
    
35.949STEELERS over Bills, 28-24PFSVAX::JACOBSTEELERS.vs.Bills, no oil leaksTue Jan 05 1993 19:009
    Big'N'Lame,
    
    Baffle-O shot their wad coming back from that deficit, and will be
    minced meat after the STEELERS take care of them(I hope).
    
    Contact me via mail fer the p-name wager with possibilities
    
    JaKe
    
35.950PFSVAX::JACOBSTEELERS.vs.Bills, no oil leaksTue Jan 05 1993 19:279
    
    >>Neil Odorko or not and I got a P-Name to say so, Fake !!
    
    Ya 'fraid Big'N'Lame, ya ain't answering my mail!!!!
    
    Hit me with the particulars, Oh Lame-O.
    
    JaKe
    
35.951AXIS::ROBICHAUDR.I.P. JohnnyWed Jan 06 1993 15:223
    	JaKe, don't sweat it.  The Steelers are going to beat Buffalo.
    
    				/Don
35.952METSNY::francusCubs in 93Wed Jan 06 1993 15:274
I think Buffalo will surprise the Steelers. But this is a game that is too much
of a crapshoot to try and handicap.

The Crazy Met
35.953PFSVAX::JACOBMets (suck) in '93Wed Jan 06 1993 18:4312
    
>>I think Buffalo will surprise the Steelers. But this is a game that is too much
    
    What's to suprise.  Baffle-O already beat the STEELERS this year, and
    the STEELERS know that if they're to advance to the AFC Championship
    game, they're going to have to play their absolute best game possible.
    
    It ain't like the late '70s when EVERYBODY expected the STEELERS to
    walk away with the playoff games.
    
    JaKe
    
35.954QUASER::HUNTERBig Game... On The BOLTS BandwagonWed Jan 06 1993 19:114
    
    GO LUCKALO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    BG
35.955SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Wed Jan 06 1993 19:3718
    
    	Personally, I'll root all the way for the Steelers, but even if
    they lose, they've still had a tremendous season.  I was one way back
    in August that said this was a horrible team and that they would be
    lucky to win 5 games.  Well, I still have doubts because of their 
    schedule, but they have had an exceptional year from what was expected.
    
    	I think the Steelers can win and I think they can win by >10. 
    Buffalo has got to be a little worn out and can't possibly be riding
    as high after that miracle last Sunday.  That win might of taken to 
    much out of them.  Then on the other hand, it might just carry them
    though.
    
    	Either way, break out the moth-ridden 'terrible towels'.  I'll
    be rootin for the Steelers.
    
    bill..g.
    
35.956CELTIK::JACOBMets(still suck) in '93Wed Jan 06 1993 20:3020
    
 >> <<< Note 35.672 by PFSVAX::JACOB "Bald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex Machine" >>>

 >>   Only thing --dan'l, I don't think they'll reach 8-8 this year, I see
 >>   6-10, or 7-9 as a probability, personally.
    
 >>   JaKe
    
    
    I'm with ya ..bill.
    
    Just glad this prediction DIDN'T come true.
    
    Even if Baffle-O wins Sat.('cept fer the p_name I'll have to wear to
    settle up with Big'N'Lame) I'll be happier than a pig in dung over the
    outcome of this season.  The real test, however, will be nexted season
    when the STEELERS have to play the first place schedule.
    
    JaKe
    
35.957CELTIK::JACOBMets(still suck) in '93Wed Jan 06 1993 20:3313
    
    >>	Either way, break out the moth-ridden 'terrible towels'.  I'll
    >>be rootin for the Steelers.
    
    
    There have been NUMEROUS commercials on around here with Myron Cope,
    Steelers color man, asking that EVERY FAN who attends the game
    Saturday, enter with a terrible towel on their shoulder, ready to wave
    like crazy.  I even think they're giving out some kind of promotional
    junk fer everybody who has one.
    
    JaKe
    
35.958What's next, rootin' for the Faids??BSS::JCOTANCHWed Jan 06 1993 21:0311
    
>    GO LUCKALO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>    
>    BG

And all this time we thought you were a true American, BG...

We're disappointed.


Joe
35.959PFSVAX::JACOBMets (suck) in '93Wed Jan 06 1993 21:4312
    
>>And all this time we thought you were a true American, BG...
    
    Joe, 
    
    He's rooting for Baffle-O cause he doesn't to be wearing the P_name
    I've picked fer him should they lose.
    
    BTW, tell Tom and Becky I said Hi.
    
    JaKe
    
35.960PFSVAX::JACOBMets (suck) in '93Wed Jan 06 1993 21:4712
    
    >>         <<< Note 35.951 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "R.I.P. Johnny" >>>

    >>	JaKe, don't sweat it.  The Steelers are going to beat Buffalo.
    
    >>					/Don
    
    Hey Slasher, why the KoD on the STEELERS?????  ya gots money on
    Baffle-O or sumthin?????
    
    JaKe