[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_91

Title:CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid
Notice:This file has been archived. New notes to CAM3::SPORTS.
Moderator:CAM3::WAY
Created:Fri Dec 21 1990
Last Modified:Mon Nov 01 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:290
Total number of notes:84103

29.0. "The Boston Red Sox Note" by MCIS1::DHAMEL (Go home Saddam Who's-Insane) Wed Jan 02 1991 13:47

    
    This topic is for the discussion of,  uh,  ...I forget.
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
29.2STAR::YANKOWSKASDo the Bartman!Fri Jan 11 1991 14:133
    >             -< My guess: he'll get $5mil per year...... >-
    
    From a west coast team after the 1991 season.
29.3damed if they do damed if they don'tCNTROL::CHILDSI could use a dramatic sting hereFri Jan 11 1991 14:2010
Not west coast team but probably the Astros who are dropping all their high
priced talent now to help beef up the treasure chest his "highness" walks 
away with. Soxs are in big trouble here. With their luck they give him 5
million per for 5 years quaranteed and his arm is blown out. They don't sign
him this year he has a great year and packs....

personally I'd do the later he's a head case anyways...

mike
29.4Just fill in the amount and sign it, RogMCIS1::DHAMELClothes are a form of censorshipFri Jan 11 1991 14:299
    
    I say "Take a chance.  Sign him."
    
    It ain't my money, and yes, he could have a blown arm in a year.  But
    gee....maybe, just *maybe*, he'll continue to be the best pitcher in
    the game for another five years. 
    
    Dickstah
    
29.5Maybe the RangersSALEM::DODAWorthy's X-mas list: Ho, Ho, HoFri Jan 11 1991 15:086
Astros aren't likely to be signing anyone for that kind of money. 
Their dumping all their high-priced talent because they want to 
lower the payroll so a buyer can be found. Unless the teams is 
sold, doubt that present management will spend the bucks.

daryll
29.6AXIS::ROBICHAUDZamfir's Heavy Metal ClassicsFri Jan 11 1991 15:204
    	Roger would sell a lot of tickets.  Plus in that canyon he would
    be real tough to hit.
    
    				/Don
29.7Sox rumorsMPO::GILBERTPats in '91 - Showin' the fireMon Jan 14 1991 14:5819
    
    Talks continue between the Sox and Clemens as well as the Sox and
    Mike Greenwell. 
    
    Clemens agents, the Hendrick's brothers, have stated they are looking
    for a "highest paid player" contract ($4M+) and that the Sox need
    to get it done within the next two weeks or so. The Hendricks
    apparently have a number of clients who will keep them very busy
    during arbitration hearings (the Sox appear to be equally tied here
    too) and they refuse to negotiate after spring training starts.
    
    
    Greenwell has placed a 4 year $12 million plus deal on the table. The
    Sox have offered four years at around $11 million. Greenwell will
    probably file for arbitration shortly. I still expect the Sox to
    trade him. After all, would you nearly double your original offer
    to a guy whose position is fillable?
    
    
29.8Clemens appealCNTROL::MACNEALPapa MacTue Jan 29 1991 12:264
29.9"Don't you know who I am?"CNTROL::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidTue Jan 29 1991 12:586
 and because the Bank of Kuawait is located in the same building everyone
 entering has to be stopped and searched. Boy I would have like to seen
 his "highness" reaction to that....

 mike
29.11MCIS1::DHAMELParade in October 91,92,93,94,95Mon Feb 11 1991 11:538
    
    Clemens signs!  The price?  Half the oil in Kuwait, but who cares?
    YAHOO!!!  THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP IS JUST AROUND THE CORNER!  THE
    FRUSTRATION ENDS!  COMMITMENT TO WINNING IS REALIZED!  MANY LONG TIME
    SOX FANS CAN DIE HAPPY!!  YIPPEE!
    
    Dickstah
    
29.12STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in 1991Mon Feb 11 1991 12:115
    If this team doesn't come smoking out of the starting gate, the "ya bum
    ya" types are going to be on them like flies on you-know-what...
    
    
    py
29.13MCIS1::DHAMELParade in October 91,92,93,94,95Mon Feb 11 1991 12:379
    
    >    If this team doesn't come smoking out of the starting gate, the "ya bum
    >    ya" types are going to be on them like flies on you-know-what...
    
    
    And deservedly so.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.14AXIS::ROBICHAUDDee NiceMon Feb 11 1991 15:085
29.15bring back rogelio moretNEMAIL::LEARYMMon Feb 11 1991 15:289
    Whoa,
    	Let's not castigate dem Sox already if they don't come out smokin'
    After Clemens and Darwin,can the Sox rely on a good 3rd or 4th starter
    (Young,Dopson,Harris, somebody please step forward). And what about
    team speed? Burks and that's it. And 3 mil for a Dh( greenwell cain't
    field,he's the dick stuart of the outfield). Plenty of questions
    
    MikeL
    
29.16same old ____ different day...AGNT99::CHILDSTango &amp; Cash, George BushMon Feb 11 1991 16:575
 Yahoo they signed Clemens, I don't have to worry about material for the next
 5 years. It a shame though to see them throw money at Greeny, Bruno and Clark
 whilst Ellis sits around waits....

 mike
29.17AGNT99::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 11 1991 17:428
29.18bridge for sale!!! AGNT99::CHILDSTango &amp; Cash, George BushMon Feb 11 1991 18:185
  hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaahahahahahahahahahahahahaa

  believe what you want Mac, but I know it's not a senority thingy....

  mike
29.19CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 11 1991 18:526
29.20Sox get million $ outfieldCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 18 1991 15:574
    Sox sign Burkes to a 1 year contract reportedly worth $1.825 million.
    
    Sox are going into Winter Haven with no contract grumblings (no
    holdouts, no ugly arbitration hearings) for the first time in a while.
29.21CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesMon Feb 18 1991 16:2414
Since the Sox have so much money to spend on their players, they'd
better make it good for the fans this year.  I'd expect to see
some high class promotions.  Some suggestions are:

	- Rolex Watch Day

	- Gucci Handbag Day

	- Dom Perignon Day

With Promotions like this, they'll set attendance records and allow
maximum exposure of their gold plated, billion dollar all club....

'Saw
29.22CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Feb 18 1991 16:543
    'Saw, they are already setting attendance records. 
    
    Besides, I'd rather have a champeenship than a Gucci handbag.
29.23CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesMon Feb 18 1991 17:035
29.25CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesMon Feb 18 1991 17:085
Heck, the fans have waited SO LONG for a champeenship, if they win
one, they should give the FANS World Series rings and not the players!

hahahahha,
'Saw
29.26Lou Lou where are you?MPO::GILBERTWhere have all the flowers gone? When will they learnMon Feb 18 1991 19:1822
    
    While they won't have any contract squabbles to worry about don't
    count on this team to be quiet and reserved. Mike Marshall is already
    bellyaching about how great he is and that he should be handed a
    job or traded. He's pissin' and moanin' about Vaughn and Quintana.
    The guy hasn't completed a season in 5 years and spent the winter
    exploring possibilities in a foreign country. Get real. 
    
    Then there'll be the Clemens_tribute_to_the_departed nonsense. 
    
    And there's bound to be a Lou Gorman statement about Britt Burns
    or one of these other aging arms being another "Jack Billingham".
    
    Oh yah, By the Way, we also have all these millionaire outfielders
    who'll now start griping about all kinds of other things.
    
    Nay, nay. Things are never dull for very long in Sox land. 
    
    What didya say? The truck ain't shown up yet? The doors to the park
    are locked? 
    
    Typical. 
29.27It's gonna happen. You heard it here...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 18 1991 19:376
    
    Look for the Sox to win a champeenship in the next five years.  I'm
    serious.
    
    glenn
    
29.28Give me Louis Rotereur's Rose.CUBIC7::DIGGINSWhat the hell is that?Tue Feb 19 1991 11:177
    
    Dom's over-rated, unless it's a Rose of course! 
    
    
    
    
    Steve
29.29CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesTue Feb 19 1991 11:539
29.30It's probably out of your price range, too. :^>WFOV12::MORRISONHomer Simpson's twin brotherTue Feb 19 1991 12:245
    'Saw, you can defer in all cases. I'll drinking all the cases :^>
    
    Bull~
    
       
29.31CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesTue Feb 19 1991 13:2113
29.32@^)-hicCUBIC7::DIGGINSWhat the hell is that?Tue Feb 19 1991 13:268
    
    Believe me 'Saw if I had my choice bixtween an expensive bottle
    of chapagne or a case of Oktoberfest, I'd take the brew anyday!
    Unless of course the bottle of champagne happens to be a Magnum!
    
    
    
    Steve
29.33MCIS1::DHAMELFreedom bell rang; he cried NO MASTue Feb 19 1991 14:1312
    
    The Woostah papah has an editorial cartoon today of the Red Sox bus
    heading down to spring training, and there's singing coming out of the
    bus:
    
    "A hundred bottles of Dom Perignon on the wall, a hundred bottles of
    Dom...."
    
    Looks like they've been scooped by the SportsNotes.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.34RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsTue Feb 19 1991 14:517
    One refreshing change this year is that the Sox have to be considered
    favorites in the east (along wif Toronto) - so in here and in the Sox
    notes I won't have to wade through the usual "overachieving" B.S. that
    most Sox fans throw out every year.  There are NO excuses if the high
    rolling Sox don't do it this year.
    
    JD
29.35FDCV06::KINGJesse's Jets!Tue Feb 19 1991 15:184
    A couple of years ago it was 24 players- 24 cabs...
    Now its 24 players and 24 limos.....
    
    REK
29.36AXIS::ROBICHAUDIndustrial Strength NoterTue Feb 19 1991 15:1916
    	The best cartoon was the one run in the Herald Sunday.  It showed
    Roger stepping out of a Rolls Royce that had steer horns on the
    hood.  Over on the side were another 10-20 Rolls Royces with different
    players names on them.  Underneath the caption read...  "The Boston
    Red Sox, 24 players, 24 Rolls Royces."  8^)
    
    	Also that Philly writer Conlan was debating with Bob Ryan whether
    or not Roger should've gotten the money.  Conlan had a classic line...
    "why would you guarantee over 20 million to a guy who *could* spend
    the rest of the season with Nurse Ratched saying 'put the ball in
    the hole Chief'"  I was rolling.  Was almost as good as his "one
    foot on a banana peel and the other in the Betty Ford Clinic" when
    talking about the Yankees guaranteeing Pascual Perez's contract
    last year.  The guy's a piece of work.
                                    
    				/Don
29.37CARROL::LEFEBVRESupport the liberation of KuwaitTue Feb 19 1991 15:3013
    JD, I disagree.  I don't see Boston taking the East as I feel that
    numbers 2-5 in the rotation are still question marks.  Also, unless Rob
    Murphy returns to his 1989 form, I don't see anyone stepping forward to
    fill Larry Anderson's role.  Reardon's back still has to be tested over
    the long haul.  No closer, no parade in October.
    
    Toronto has a better everyday lineup and a healthy Baltimore will
    compete to the end. 
    
    Boston may have the fattest payroll, but they still need to fill some
    key holes.
    
    Mark.
29.38RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsTue Feb 19 1991 15:3924
    Hey thanks Mark.  Now, come Sept. when the Sox are still in it, I can
    hear the familiar litany "Who ever expected them to be where they are. 
    What a gutsy bunch of guys.  Overachieving to the max.  Blah, blah,
    blah"
    
    I don't know, in the past, teams spending a lot of cash were put down
    if they didn't win it all.  Sox have NO excuses this year.   If they
    don't win this year, they will be chokers, plain and simple.
    
    By popular opinion (Boston-area), the Sox have the best pitcher in
    baseball, the best 3rd baseman, the best catcher, 2nd baseman and
    center fielder in the American league, a solid left and right fielder,
    plus a solid first base/designated hitter combo.  After the franchise,
    they have a very passable starting rotation, plus a stopper.
    
    This team is talented. This is not an overachieving team.  This is an
    underachieving team.  
    
    No excuses.  No excuses.  No excuses.  It's finally put up or shut up
    time for this team.  No more loveable 2nd place finishes, no more
    valient sweeps in the playoffs.  Either win it all or drop to the
    cellar.
    
    JD
29.39JD, try switching to Decaf...AXIS::ROBICHAUDIndustrial Strength NoterTue Feb 19 1991 15:441
    
29.40Darwin + Young = Boddicker? Reardon = Smith?CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 19 1991 16:011
    
29.41Underacheiver = MetsCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 19 1991 16:021
    
29.43MCIS1::DHAMELSox go 162-0; swept in playoffsTue Feb 19 1991 16:312
    
    
29.44STAR::YANKOWSKASThe Celtics are for realTue Feb 19 1991 17:2111
    It'll come down to whether or not Darwin and Young succeed in picking
    up the slack left by Boddicker's departure.  If they do, the Sox should
    win it.  Toronto is different, but I'm not convinced they're better;
    much as I'd like to see the O's win it, I still think they're a year
    and a Rhodes and a Mussina away.
    
    If Darwin and Young fall flat on their faces, this team could very
    easily finish fifth....
    
    
    py
29.45More sad, dishonest Red Sox rhetoric (try living in Cleveland)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 19 1991 17:4012
    Exactly what expectations did *you* have for the Red Sox the past five
    years, JD?  Anything close to the three division titles and one
    pennant that they did win?
    
    To be sure, the Red Sox have been imperfect and have come up short, but
    I've probably gotten more enjoyment out of watching them play over the 
    last five years than have the baseball fans in all but a few cities 
    (and I'm first and foremost a displaced Baltimore Orioles fan!)  
    
    glenn
    
29.46CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesTue Feb 19 1991 17:4522
Pena is a good solid catching, perhaps approaching greatness.  But the best?
I love to watch him play however.


I tend to agree with Hawk.

The Sox have marginally increase their talent over last year, for a much
more expensive outlay of dinero.  Personally, while some of you may
disagree, I think that Gorman could General Manage his way out of a
paper bag.  And while they owner may not be a blatantly inept as
George was, they have been quietly mucking up the works for years.

Pitching wins ball games.  Team speed wins ball games.  The Red Sox
have one great pitcher, and a passable remainder as JD has said.
They have know team speed.  Even I, who have all the speed of
Yogi Berra carrying a Franklin Stove, would be fast on the REd Sox....

Alas, I think we've just spent a ton of dough to keep the status quo...

No parade in October....what else could you expect?

'saw
29.47CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesTue Feb 19 1991 17:469
29.48Depends on if it's his lunch bag or not ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 19 1991 17:5410
    Wasn't that supposed to have been a WET paper bag, 'Saw?  When I first
    read it, and thought that not only could Gorman manage his way out of a
    paper bag, but a *dry* one, I said to myself, "Damn, that's impressive.  
    I'm glad the Sox are in such good hands..."
    
    Quite a feat for Lou, if'n ya think about it...
    
    glenn
     
29.49They've given excitement over the past 5 years.....DECWET::METZGERJohn-man,johnster,johnerino,the j-man...Tue Feb 19 1991 17:5426
That's what I love so much about baseball. You can't tell anything about a team
judging it from pre-season. You can't even predict one game from another
never mind trying to predict a whole season..

Who would have figured the White Sox to play so well last year and the Royals
so poorly? Joe superstar can just as easily have a horrible season as a good one
during any given year. There's just too many variables to say if X team doesn't
win it all than they've underachieved (except if it's the Mets)

Granted the A's should be in the playoff hunt with the talent on the team but to
predict in the pre-season when there's 162 games plus playoffs to go that they
should win it all without a doubt is really quite funny.

Especially with a team like the Sox with some huge holes in their lineup 
(Starting pitching after Clemens, Closer, SS) you can't predict much of anything.

The Royals, Angels and Padres have proven many a time that having the highest 
paid players doesn't mean that you have the best.

If the Sox had signed Boddicker then I'd say they would be the favorites to win
the AL East..but with Young (19 losses) and Darwin trying to fill his shoes I
have to say the East is a toss up this year between the Sox, O's and Jays.

Metz

29.50CAM::WAYToo much forking, lots of child processesTue Feb 19 1991 17:5520
Glenn, 

I gotta have the field circus guy come out and look at this
keyboard.  It throwing a words is very you know.

I mean, It KEEPS throwing a LOT OF words AND is very EXASPERATING you know!

Right.  

	Lou Gorman manage bags!

I mean


	Lou Gorman could not General Manage his way out of a wet paper bag!


Phew!

'Saw
29.51WRONG, BIG-TIME GLENNRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsTue Feb 19 1991 18:5829
    Glenn,
    
    First, where do you get off with the sad dishonest bullsh*t?  I've
    expected a LOT from the Sox over the last 5 years.  They've had a very
    talented team, except that Sox fans, for the most part, seem to feel
    securer if they label them as average - thereby the scenario of"
    
    *  If they win, it's amazing that they did it, what with the lack of
       talented players that play for them.
    
    *  If they don't win, it's - "Hey who expected them to do anything,
       anyway"
    
    The negative response I get from the so-proclaimed Red_Sox Super Fan
    Jihad, both here and in the Sox notes, only leaves me to believe that
    most Sox fans are afraid to say the Sox are good.  Afraid that the
    razzing they've given other teams will come back to haunt them.
    
    So Glenn, I know it's hard for you to believe, but you're way off base
    on this point.  I've been a Sox fan my whole life, and I feel that
    they've had a good product over the last few years - and that they've
    underachieved, not overachieved.  
    
    And my feelings are being borne out again - everyone is already
    starting the"  "well, we ain't really that good, oh sob" - but come
    August it will be "WOW, what a bunch of overachievers!!!  What a bunch
    of scrappy, blue collar players... "
    
    JD
29.52Where is that de-caf?NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Feb 19 1991 19:2124
    
    > First, where do you get off with the sad dishonest bullsh*t?  I've
    
    Probably the same place you do with the usual "sanctimonious" Red Sox
    fan routine.  You don't take it too seriously, and neither will I,
    okay?
    
    > And my feelings are being borne out again - everyone is already
    > starting the"  "well, we ain't really that good, oh sob" - but come
    > August it will be "WOW, what a bunch of overachievers!!!  What a bunch
    > of scrappy, blue collar players... "
    
    Not from me.  If you noticed, yesterday I said that this team has
    enough going for it, with their current players and what I see coming
    up, that I have reasonable expectations that they'll win it all 
    sometime in the next five years.  I don't think you could have made 
    that statement five years ago, and if you did, I think you were being 
    unrealistic.
    
    By the way, what're you gonna do if they ever do win it, JD?  Enjoy it
    or implode from all that pent-up frustration? ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.53CARROL::LEFEBVRESupport the liberation of KuwaitTue Feb 19 1991 19:273
    JD, what a crock. (lats notwithstanding)
    
    Mark.
29.54RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsTue Feb 19 1991 19:339
    Glenn,
    
    Sanctimonious can be easily proven.  Just read the Sox notesfile for a
    year or so.  More back-patting in there then at the dog show.  
    
    Boston teams are generally characterized as gutsy underachievers.  Many
    fans characterize other teams as ovverated, media hyped, etc....
    
    JD
29.55CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 19 1991 19:3517
    JD, just about everyone in baseball, not just in Beantown, didn't
    expect the Sox to win the AL East when they did.  If you really think
    Kieker, Bolton, Gray, et.al. didn't overacheive last season, I guess
    you didn't get that many games in Seattle.
    
    I think there will be big things expected of the Sox this year, though. 
    There won't be as many distractions in spring training.  Burkes,
    Greenwell, Brunansky, and Reardon are healthy.  They've added a slugger
    in Jack Clark.
    
    There are some serious questions on this club, though.  Can Darwin and
    Young replace Boddicker?  Can Murphy come back to form and give them
    back a Larry Anderson type stretch performance.  Will Lamp's luck
    finally run out?  How is Reardon's back really holding up?  Will we see
    sophmore slumps from the likes of Bolton, Kieker, Gray, and Quintana?
    
    I'm just going to sit back and enjoy being close to baseball again.
29.56RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsTue Feb 19 1991 20:1412
    Mac,
    
    How can a team win 3 of 5, yet everyone not expect nothing less than a
    title year?  That unreal.  With the lineup they have, they should
    always be in it.  The pitching isn't as bad as everyone is making it
    out to be.  I strongly feel that Darwin will win at least 16 games. 
    Clemens should win about 27 with that lineup.  
    
    Overall, the Sox strenghtened the team in the offseason.  They should
    take the next logical step up.  A World Series berth is expected by me.
    
    JD
29.57COOKIE::WAHLTue Feb 19 1991 20:4822
    As a somewhat objective bysitter, I think JD's got a pretty solid
    point.  I was in Boston doing Sandbox demos at DECWorld last August
    when the Sox started to struggle and the papers, TV and  radio
    reporting was nothing but "Oh, well, this was inevitable.  The boys was
    playin' over dere heads, an' it's come home to roost."  Remember the
    Globe printing the countdown as the Sox lost their lead in the AL East? 
    I kept that one for a souvenir.
    
    My wife made a nifty comment when she came back to New England with me
    for a foliage vacation and business trip.  She was looking at the Globe
    one morning during breakfast, either right after the ChiSox series or
    after the first game of the LCS.  Somebody was paying the Sox a left
    handed complement for staying alive long enough to have the opportunity
    get vaporized in the LCS.  She commented, "This town doesn't deserve
    this team."
    
    To be fair (as George reminded me in the baseball notesfile last year),
    the media isn't the same as the fans.  But I do think that a lot of
    people read this crud and it affects the way a whole bunch of people
    think about the Red Sox.
    
    Dave W.
29.58AXIS::ROBICHAUDIndustrial Strength NoterWed Feb 20 1991 10:517
    	So if we are using payroll as the measuring stick of a team's
    talent one would have to surmise that the team with the largest
    payroll is the league's best, and if that team does not win the
    World Series they choked.  Want to guess who has the largest payroll
    in baseball?
    
    				/Don
29.59CARROL::LEFEBVRESupport the liberation of KuwaitWed Feb 20 1991 11:1356
    
    
	Pitchers 
		1990		1991
	ROTATION:
	1.	Clemens		Clemens
	2.	Boddicker.......Darwin
	3.	Harris..........Young
	4.	Bolton		Bolton
	5.	Kiecker		Kiecker/Dopson
	BULLPEN:
	6.	Reardon		Reardon
	7.	Andersen........Harris
	8.	Gray		Gray
	9.	Murphy		Murphy
	10.	Lamp		Lamp/Kiecker/Hetzel
		Hesketh		Hesketh
		Gardner.........

	Departed: Boddicker, Andersen, Gardner 
	Added:    Darwin, Young, (healthy Dopson?)

	Everyday players and bench

		   1990		1991
	STARTERS:
	11.	C  Pena		Pena
	12.	1B Quintana.....Vaughn	
	13.	2B Reed		Reed
	14.	3B Boggs	Boggs
	15.	SS Rivera.......Naehring
	16.	LF Greenwell	Greenwell
	17.	CF Burks	Burks
	18.	RF Brunansky	Brunansky
	19.	DH Evans........Clark
	BENCH:
	20.	   Marshall.....Quintana (Marshall?)
	21.	   Barrett......Rivera
	22.	   Heep.........Moses
	23.	   Marzano	Marzano		
	24.	   Romine	Romine (Plantier?)
	25.	   Kutcher	Kutcher	
	
	Departed: Evans, Barrett, Heep, (Marshall?)
	Added:    Vaughn, Naehring, Clark, Moses, (Plantier?)

    
    Net minus on the pitching side, and if Reardon's back isn't healed you
    can throw away a third of Clemens' wins.
    
    Net plus with the everyday lineup, but a lot of question marks
    regarding the long term health of Clark and Naehring.
    
    Overall, I see little improvement over last year's team.
    
    Mark.
29.60By and large, the Fenway crowd is positive...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 20 1991 12:4436
    
    > My wife made a nifty comment when she came back to New England with me
    > for a foliage vacation and business trip.  She was looking at the Globe
    > one morning during breakfast, either right after the ChiSox series or
    > after the first game of the LCS.  Somebody was paying the Sox a left
    > handed complement for staying alive long enough to have the opportunity
    > get vaporized in the LCS.  She commented, "This town doesn't deserve
    > this team."
    
    I think there's some confusion here.  The Boston media's attitude
    towards the Red Sox is a lot closer to JD's than those of the fans who 
    can appreciate what they've done in the recent past.  That is, come 
    last September the papers starting filling up with the "choke" stories, 
    immediately followed by the ALCS "choke" stories, and inevitably there 
    would have been World Series "choke" stories had they made it that far.  
    Sure, occasionally a Bob Ryan pops in for an apologetic reality check, 
    but generally the Shaughnessys of the papers dominate and are quick, 
    swift and relentless with the hammer, regardless of the circumstances.  
    
    I even heard Nick Cafardo, a competent baseball writer, come right out 
    and say on a radio show last week that as a beat man he gets much more 
    enjoyment out of his work with a losing Boston club than a winning one.  
    I'd say that's typical in Boston.  In some other cities no one would 
    even bother picking up the paper if the team wasn't doing well, but in
    Boston it's relished by the media and a very vocal contingent of
    malcontented fans. 
    
    I don't think your wife was referring to the fans who appreciated
    the effort and came away nothing more than a little disappointed with
    their ALCS performance (which was not up to snuff, win or lose, I
    freely admit).  Anyone who was sincerely counting on an ALCS win over
    the A's, followed up by a World Series victory, was not residing in 
    this world.  Hoping, yes, but not expecting...
    
    glenn
     
29.62CAM::WAYThe time you won your town the raceWed Feb 20 1991 13:2420
One thing that you can say about the Boston Red Sox is that their fans
are loyal.  Regardless of what attitudes may be attributed to us, 
or regardless of what excuses are attributed to us, we are LOYAL.

My dad has been a Red Sox fan for years and years and years.  I've
been a Sox fan since I started following baseball in 1966.

No matter what they have done, no matter what Liebestod we've gone
through in 1967, 1975 (bad), 1986 (THE WORST), we've stood by them.

In fact, if/when the Sox ever win the Big One, I won't know how to
react.


JD, I can understand what you are saying, but if you take a step 
back there are many, many teams whose fans are the same way.
It's not just a Boston phenomenon in this case....

'Saw

29.63REFINE::ASHEWhatever happened to Bic Bananas?Wed Feb 20 1991 13:254
    I'd bet Plantier and Vaughn start the year in the minors so they don't
    accumulate seniority for future arbitration later....
    
    -Walt
29.64COOKIE::WAHLWed Feb 20 1991 13:4316
    I agree about the crowd which shows up for the games, Glenn.  I love
    going to games at Fenway.  Of course, I like going to the Twinkie
    Metrodome too, which tells you that I have no standards ;-).
    
    It seems to me that Boston has embraced Red Sox chokes as some kind of
    cultural heritage.  Some towns think winning is a birthright, and other
    towns have baseball but almost conciously ignore it until the team gets
    into the pennant race with a shot at the big prize.  But Boston seems
    unique in this pessimism.
    
    As far as paying players is concerned:  you may not be able to buy a
    pennant, but I think there is a flip side to that principle -- you can
    fritter a good team away by not rewarding them or by rewarding them
    inequally. Take a look at Houston and the post-Thrift Pirates.
    
    Dave W.
29.65seriously Walt, I won't bet against you...STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Feb 20 1991 14:018
    re .63:
    
    Moe Vaughn, whom the Boston media has already handed the AL Rookie of 
    the Year award to on a silver platter, start the year in the minors?
    Heaven forbid...  :-)
    
    
    py
29.67will they win one in my lifetime?NEMAIL::LEARYMWed Feb 20 1991 14:4022
    
    I,too,.have been a loyal,diehard Sox fan for years. I agree that the 
    media creates an atmosphere of expected doom for the Sox which the fans
    always point to when the Sox end up on the losing end. However, it
    doesn't deter me from rooting my a** off for them every year. I think
    one of these years, they're going to win it all. Glenn, I agree with
    you that a champeenship will come within 5 yrs(look at the influx of
    young talent, Reed,Naehring,Vaughn,etc. just keep developing some
    young pitching and keep the pursestrings relatively open). But, then
    again I've been an optimist all these years.
    	I'm still not over '86 tho, and every btime the Sox come close,I
    always expect the worst. I'll never forget being at a Halloween party
    watching game 6,with all the partgoers seemingly throwin them pitches
    with Schiraldi and Stanley. As soon as they lost, party was over. The
    house was cleared out in 10 minutes.
    
    Hey 'Saw, how close are you to the Connecticut Yankee-Red Sox mythical
    d-mark line?  closer to Pew haven than Hereford?
    
    MikeL
    
    
29.68AXIS::ROBICHAUDIndustrial Strength NoterWed Feb 20 1991 14:487
	Walt, old bonehaid Morgan is already sowing those seeds in the 
media with his "it's Quintana job" quotes.  My guess is Mo will get the 
call after a good start in the minors and they will *try* to trade Carlos 
to anyone who wants a 25 year old firstbaseman with the body of a 40 year 
old.

				/Don
29.69CAM::WAYThe time you won your town the raceWed Feb 20 1991 14:5520
>    Hey 'Saw, how close are you to the Connecticut Yankee-Red Sox mythical
>    d-mark line?  closer to Pew haven than Hereford?

Nope.  I grew up in Glastonbury, which is just slightly south east of
Hartford, across the Connecticut River.

It's smack dab in the middle of that area that is the MIX of Yankmee and
Red Sox fans.  One of my dad's best friends was a Yankee fan.  You should
have heard the two of them go at it.  The "best" was when the Yanks
and Sox would play head to head.  One time I remember Yaz fanned to end
the game.  The stuff from the Yank's fan was unbearable, until later
in the series, Yaz had an excellent game to help the Sox come from behind
to win -- then it went the other way....

Nothin' like it....

'Saw
    
    

29.70Red Sox fans are specialSHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Wed Feb 20 1991 15:1150
 No, I beg to disagree ...
 
 Right now, Red Sox fans are a breed unto themselves.  Just about all of
 that special something is wrapped up in the l-o-n-g titleless streak
 dating back to 1918.  And each seven-game nightmare Series loss (1946,
 1967, 1975, 1986) just enhances the dark legend that much more.
 
 Other teams have long losing histories.  The Cubs and the Phillies come to
 mind.  The Cubs' fans, who have waited even longer than Boston, seem to
 inspire a lovable "what-the-hell-let's-party" attitude about their
 misfortunes.  Many, many times I have resolved to adopt that exact
 attitude about my own favorites if only to save my own sanity.  
 
 Red Sox fans will do no such thing.  Each loss is another chapter in the
 I-Told-You-This-Is-Agony Book.   
 
 I sympathize with Red Sox fans and I wish they could have a title.  I grew
 up a Phillies fan and the 1970s were a gut-wrenching roller coaster ride. 
 They had a simply awesome team with a young Mike Schmidt and a prime time
 Steve Carlton.  They had great defense, plenty of sock, solid fundamentals
 and a deep bullpen.  They were my dream team.
 
 However they had the albatross of 97 years of franchise history and not a
 single title to show for it.  And their long history of failures was just
 as heart-rending as the Red Sox.  Whisper "1964" in any Phillies' fan's
 ear and you'll see him shudder in dread horror of that debacle.
 
 So, they won three straight *dominating* division titles in 1976, 1977,
 and 1978 yet lost in the playoffs each year.
 
 And the doom gloomed lower each year.   Finally, Danny Ozark was canned
 and Pete Rose arrived and all the ghosts went away forever in 1980. 
 
                             *** FOREVER ***
 
 I sincerely hope the Boston Red Sox can have their own "1980" someday. 
 But you will have to give up a certain part of your "heritage" as Sox
 fans.  1980 was the Promised Land for the Phillies but once you drink from
 the Holy Grail, the whole world changes.  The drink is sweet, no doubt,
 but it marks a significant change and you'll never drink the old drink
 again.  Part of the special unique feeling you have now as Red Sox fans
 will be gone forever.   A lot of people will gladly say so long but still
 others will look back and say it was so simple back then when they blew it
 every year.
 
 How Red Sox fans survived 1986 is beyond me.  I have never seen sports
 fate so cruel and rotten than in the 10th inning of Game Six in Shea
 Stadium.
 
 Bob Hunt
29.71VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Feb 20 1991 15:3012
>>	Walt, old bonehaid Morgan is already sowing those seeds in the 
>>media with his "it's Quintana job" quotes.

I read the same quotes, /Don, but I read them differently.  I think Morgan was
just stating the obvious for the papers.  People have already awarded Mo Vaughn
the rookie of the year/MVP trophies.  Morgan was just reminding people that it
was Quintana's job to lose in spring training (same for Rivera/Naehring at SS). 
He points out that the lineup that won them the pennant last year was a good
starting place for the spring and the rookies would have to win their jobs from
the vets.  That's a healthy attitude.

j.
29.72RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsWed Feb 20 1991 15:4818
    Hawk and Saw - I've been saying for years that 'fans are fans" - but
    there's still that "boston fans are the best in the world" mentality.
    
    Yep, Mark, you iced it.  The division winning team is improved over
    last year.  The Jays aren't as good, IMO. Sox should repeat.  I expect
    it.   I'm with the Sox where I was with the Giants in 1985.  After
    decades of nothing, the Giants finally made the NFL playoffs in 81. 
    The team had a bad year, but generally improved.  I started to not
    revel in merely making the playoffs, or making it beyond the first
    round.  I wanted a division title, I wanted a Championship.  And they
    delivered.  IMO, you have to go beyond, at times, being happy with a
    excellent loss.   The Sox need positive kharma from the fans.  After
    they win it all, then revert back tothe old ways.  I did it with the
    Giants, which is why this year's championship was completely sweet..
    
    It's been fun seeing ya squirm, though.
    
    JD
29.73I think Vaughn's safe...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 20 1991 15:5010
    
    Mo Vaughn will come north with the club unless he absolutely stinks
    Winter Haven up, whether he's the starter or not.  There's been too
    much written about him, and too many glowing reports from within the
    organization for anything else to happen.  Don't expect to see any
    fuel for the racist/arbitration fire from this one, even if it's 
    because the issue has been pointed out and everyone's watching...
    
    glenn
      
29.74CARROL::LEFEBVRESupport the liberation of KuwaitWed Feb 20 1991 16:256
    JD, I challenge you to dig up even *one* example of a anyone in here
    saying Boston fans are number 1.
    
    REK don't count.
    
    Mark.
29.75QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Feb 20 1991 16:5528
I've always kind of liked the Sox



                       The Chicago WHITE Sox!!!!


                           HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

                 Cubs and White Sox... ALL THE WAY!!!!

                        WHATTA SERIES!!!!!!!!!!


ALL TOGETHER NOW!!!:::

TAKE! ME out to the BALLLL gaaame
TAKE! me out with the Crowwwwwd
BUY me some peanuts and CRACKerjacks
I don't care if I EVer get back 
So let's ROOT ROOT ROOT for the Cuuuuubbies 
if they don't win it's a shaaaaaaame!!!
`Cause it's ONE... TWO... THREEE strikes you're out
at the OLLLLLLLLLD... BALLLLLLLLL GAAAAAME!!!


YEEEAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
Mike JN
29.76RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsWed Feb 20 1991 16:5614
    Mark,
    
    Firsted off, the archived copies of SPORTS aren't available - and
    frankly I don't have time.  Heck - "M.L." Carr's p_name for a long long
    time was "Boston - best overall Sports town".  I've read the Boston
    fans are #1 in the Globe, Herald, the Sports note, and the Red Sox
    note.   Hey Mark, I lived there fore 13 years - right in the heart of
    town.  My arguement was always that they were no different than fans of
    other cities - Big Mac should be able to back that up - we sent mail
    about it when he first went to Texas.   It stemmed from the great NY
    bashes that used to go on all the time.  
    
    JD
    
29.77AXIS::ROBICHAUDIndustrial Strength NoterWed Feb 20 1991 17:082
    	He's got no proof Mark.  I bet you beat him in the "Fenway Great
    Lat Posedown" this year too.
29.78MCIS1::DHAMELSox go 162-0; swept in playoffsWed Feb 20 1991 17:138
    
    Re .70 Bob Hunt
    
    That was a truly beautiful note.  Certainly worthy of the Red Sox notes
    file, where all the best writers are.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.79Boston may not be the hands down best but close to itKIDVAX::MBROOKSWed Feb 20 1991 17:3414
    I dont see the big difference in this years team compared to last year
    just that there paying big money up front rather than waiting untill
    after people hold out before giving them the big money...Most cities
    would kill to have sports teams like boston (other than a few).  We
    have the celtics (Best Basketball team of all time, most championships
    great fans, the garden).  We have the Broons, who in case you didnt
    know have the longest winning streak of any professional sport (thats
    an above .500 season)..Then we got the soxs, who cosistently almost
    get there, but they give the fans something to be excited about.  Then
    lastly the patiots, who never win but sure get alot of press, and hey
    ya got ta love em....So sit back relax and watch the redsox almost get
    there once again, and if you think there going to win it all you better
    put some money on it becasue im sure it will pay great odds....
    								MaB
29.80DECWET::METZGERNatasha - Go get Moose and SquirrelWed Feb 20 1991 17:4920
Having lived in Seattle for 6 months now I think that their is a difference
between Boston fans and Seattle fans.

The Boston fans are more knowledgeable about their teams but tend to use it
in a negative way. (ie xxx sucks, xxx should be traded) Around here you get
more positive statements. The fans are a lot more rabid about football but
could care less about Basketball and baseball.

You also seem to get a lot more people that could care less about professional
sports in any way.

Boston fans tend to pat themselves on the back a lot and look snobbily down 
on other cities....


JMHO,

  Metz
 
29.81FDCV07::KINGJesse's Jets!Wed Feb 20 1991 18:315
    Cute Laflub, real cute....
    
    REK
    
    
29.82AXIS::ROBICHAUDIndustrial Strength NoterThu Feb 21 1991 10:172
	Hey Metz what do you know anyway, you thought Spike Owen was
    an All Star!
29.83CAM::WAYThe time you won your town the raceThu Feb 21 1991 11:0615
Well, I'm one of those unusual fans who support some Boston teams
and some New York teams.  I'm fiercely loyal to all of them.

I think there is a certain mystique to being a Boston fan.  Whether or
not that's different than being a fan of another team from another
large metropolitan area, I can't say.

I think it takes a certain kind of something to be a Boston Red Sox
fan, just as it took a certain kind of something to be a New York
Giants fan in the late 60's and all of the 70s.

I try to avoid (on a personal level) handing out superlatives such
as BEST.  I mean, you can't compare apples and oranges....

'Saw
29.84The crowning glory of boyhoodVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERRah! Rah! Bronx! Go, Bronx!Wed Mar 06 1991 21:309
>No matter what they have done, no matter what Liebestod we've gone
>through in 1967, 1975 (bad), 1986 (THE WORST), we've stood by them.
    
    Frank, please don't leave out 1978.  I've heard opinions that it was
    even worse than '86 from some circles.
    
    Mark, do you remember what happened?
    
    Dan
29.85He picks wings off flies, too.COOKIE::RECURS::WAHLThu Mar 07 1991 03:4010
    
>    Frank, please don't leave out 1978.  I've heard opinions that it was
>    even worse than '86 from some circles.
    
    Sumthin' about the day "Bucky @#$%ing Dent" entered all our
    vocabularies, as I recall.
    
    You can be cruel, Dan.  ;-)
    
    Dave W.
29.86AXIS::ROBICHAUDHeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYouThu Mar 07 1991 10:488
29.87"You can tell by the way /Don used to walk ...."LUNER::BROOKSNah .... tax problems ...Thu Mar 07 1991 11:1214
    Ha ha ha ....
    
    I can just picture The Slasher in his white John Travolta suit with the
    bell bottoms and big lapels, getting busy to the beat of the Bee Gees
    .... :-)
    
    That's even better than Bob Hunt as M.C. Hammer
    
    Ah Ah Ah .. Stayin' Alive, Stayin' Alive ... Ah Ah Ah .. Stayin' Alive 
    Stayin' Aliiiiiiiive  ....
    
    Them was the days !
    
    Doc
29.88Doc that was pretty good...AXIS::ROBICHAUDHeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYouThu Mar 07 1991 12:381
    
29.89MCIS1::DHAMELA toon trapped in a man's bodyThu Mar 07 1991 12:4219
    
    I think most long-time hemorredsox sufferers will agree that '86 was
    the worst emotionally.
    
    I remember the Halloween dance at the town hall where most of the
    attendees left the dance floor and huddled around the few tiny black 
    and white portables to watch the end of the game.  When the game ended,
    so then did the party for all intents and purposes.  If Poe were to
    re-write "The Masque of the Red Death" today, the tragedy and the
    horror and disgust of that night would make the plague seem like a
    diaper rash.
    
    Even in the seventh game where the Sox took a three run lead, I
    couldn't get excited, but just stared at the screen, resigned to the
    inevitable.  At that point the spirit was just too broken.  I had
    learned to accept fate in all its ugliness the Saturday night before.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.90What happened in '86 Dickster?AXIS::ROBICHAUDHeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYouThu Mar 07 1991 14:311
    
29.91MCIS1::DHAMELA toon trapped in a man's bodyThu Mar 07 1991 14:466
    
    Slasher, about them 'shrooms you got that wipe away all traces of bad
    memories:  If you're sellin', I'm buyin'.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.92AXIS::ROBICHAUDHeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYouThu Mar 07 1991 14:599
	Dickstah, you know how they got hypnotists to help you lose weight, 
hypnotists to help you quit smoking.  Well there now is a hypnotist who 
helps you forget memorable Red Sox collapses.  Every time you hear Dick 
Stockton's voice say "there's a high fly ball headed to right", your mind 
goes blank and you start hearing birds chirping, bees buzzing and you get 
the feeling of oneness with nature.  Same thing happens everytime Bill 
Buckner starts to bend down to pick up that slow roller.  It's great.

				/Don
29.93MCIS1::DHAMELA toon trapped in a man's bodyThu Mar 07 1991 15:586
    
    I'll have to give that a try.  Nothing like the birds and the bees to
    take your mind of the unpleasant.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.94MILKWY::SLABOUNTYGot into a war with reality ...Thu Mar 07 1991 19:4512
    
    	RE: .92
    
    	"High fly ball to right?"  Wasn't Bucky's shot to left or
    	left-center?
    
    	And that was just the icing on the cake for that year.
    	The Red Sox were ahead of NY by something like 13 or 14
    	games before they started their "decline".
    
    							GTI
    
29.95RE .94 See how well it works...AXIS::ROBICHAUDHeySurgeonGereral,ThisBUD'sForYouFri Mar 08 1991 10:441
    
29.96Is there a "Flatline"to erase bad memories?NEMAIL::LEARYMFri Mar 08 1991 16:219
    '86 takes the cake for this Sox fan. The sheer,savage,shocking slap
    in the face during the bottom of the 12th killed me. In '78, you
    had a month of gradual agony before the playoff game so you were
    kind of expecting the results. I could just kill Schiraldi,Stanley,
    Gedman, Buckner, and Johnny Mac.
    
    The visions still remain.
    MikeL
      
29.97Quality starts..ASABET::J_REIDBart Simpson for GovernorWed Mar 13 1991 14:0510
    
    
    Does anyone have how many quality starts Roger Clemens had last year?
    
    
    I need it to win a bet...Thanks..
    
    
    
    Jim
29.98CAM::WAYHappiness is a warm scrum, monWed Mar 13 1991 14:1541
29.99Sometimes Red Sox fans are just too much...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 13 1991 14:3725
    
> And Stanley and Gedman....  To me, Stanley will forever carry the same
> kind of stigma that Chicago Black Sox carried.  He blew it.  But
> Buckner.....  Bill Buckner is still a dirty word in my folks house...
    
    And Buckner stills resides in some kind of fantasy world where he
    expects the fans to be completely displaced and objective and to 
    forget it ever happened (the game was already tied, blah, blah, blah).
    Kind of sad, really.
    
    That reminds me of something I read a couple of weeks ago in the Globe
    that tells you something about Boston fans and really had me rolling.
    Some guy wrote a letter really giving it to Bill Buckner about getting
    a life and accepting responsibility and owning up to the fact that he,
    not the fans, blew it in that game.  It was scathing and pretty long,
    and at the bottom, in the spirit of forgiveness, the letter was signed:
    
    Reverend Something Somebody
    Boston, MA
    
    Brought tears to my eyes (don't ask me of sadness or joy)!
    
    glenn
     
    
29.100MCIS1::DHAMELBart meets Doogie on 'The Symptoms'Wed Mar 13 1991 14:537
    
    Actually, the Boston fans were quite forgiving of Billybuck.  After he
    had returned to the Sox (last year?) he was given one of the longest
    ovations in the opening day introductions.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.101AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Northeastern! What a Team!!Wed Mar 13 1991 15:494
    	Stanley gets the blame for the "wild pitch", but Gedman really
    should've had the "passed ball".
    
    				/Don
29.102MCIS1::DHAMELBart meets Doogie on 'The Symptoms'Wed Mar 13 1991 16:383
    
    /Don, take some more of those 'shrooms.  You're starting to remember!
    
29.104CAM::WAYHappiness is a warm scrum, monWed Mar 13 1991 17:3210
Slasher, 

I don't care how you spread the BLAM.  Stanely couldn't throw, and
Gedman couldn't see out of those slits for eyes he has...

Buckner is so old he couldn't bend over, and Johnny Mac...well....

Oh well.....

'Saw
29.105I Don't Like That GuyRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Mar 21 1991 18:2327
    Gedman, that big fat pig, missed the ball. Plain and simple. He was
    probably planning his next at bat and figuring how to keep his feet on
    the ground when he allowed a pitch that was slightly outside and high
    to go to the backstop.
    
    Then he and his fat butt waddled back there as Stanley chugged in to
    cover home.
    
    People seem to place alot of blame on Stanley due to his lack of
    effectiveness in his latyer years. But Stanley was one of the best
    relievers in the American League for awhile and actually contributed to
    any success the Sox had during his career. He agreed to start, be a
    middle reliever and a closer. He did it all and never gave any hokie
    excuses. A class act from beginning to end.
    
    But Gedman, that fat pig, has one decent year and holds out for some
    huge amount of money. Then he starts swinging a bat like Cloris
    Leachman, for heavans' sake. In the event a pitcher hits his fat butt
    with a pitch and he gets on base he runs about as fast as George
    Kevarian to a closed hot dog stand.
    
    Big Foot was one og my all-time favorites. It really irks me when he
    gets blamed for that play when it was really that fat pig, Gedman's
    fault.
    
    Rich
    
29.106CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Mar 21 1991 18:314
    But Rich, how do you really feel.
    
    Stanley did pretty well in his later years, too.  He did some great
    pitching down the stretch and in the playoffs in '86.
29.107Pardon the sarcasm...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Mar 21 1991 18:3220
    
    > Gedman, that big fat pig, missed the ball. Plain and simple. He was
    > probably planning his next at bat and figuring how to keep his feet on
    > the ground when he allowed a pitch that was slightly outside and high
    > to go to the backstop.
    
    Actually, I think it was inside and kind of low, but I still concur
    with the opinion.
    
    > But Gedman, that fat pig, has one decent year and holds out for some
    > huge amount of money. Then he starts swinging a bat like Cloris
    > Leachman, for heavans' sake. In the event a pitcher hits his fat butt
    > with a pitch and he gets on base he runs about as fast as George
    > Kevarian to a closed hot dog stand.
    
    And there you have it, folks.  The opinion of another one of those
    glassy-eyed, adoring, rationalizing Red Sox fans.  Gotta lov' it!
    
    glenn
    
29.108Telephone call for Mr. BrakeNRADM::GALVINo..........|||| CandlepinsThu Mar 21 1991 18:403
    Ring....Ring....Ring
    
    "Hello......Mr. Brake, it's for you.  It's Rich Gedman.
29.109AXIS::ROBICHAUDHomer,Plato,Voltaire,DonKingThu Mar 21 1991 18:481
    	Hey Rich, are you implying that George Kevarian is slow?
29.110RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOLet's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN!Thu Mar 21 1991 19:1717
    Glenn,
    
    I got the sarcasm, but Sox fans, especially over in the Sox note,
    basically stage a love-fest for the team.  God forbid anyone with a
    differing opinion, as I found out last year after the Clemens/Cooney
    fiasco, when so many of those objective, bitter Sox fans saw fit to
    send me mail and basically try to run me out of the conference because
    I didn't side with Roger (i.e. God).
    
    Glenn, yep, certain players can be criticized - Stanley, Rice, Buckner,
    Gedman, sometimes Barrett, Rivera - but not any of the demigods,
    especially Roger.  
    
    The Sox are alway the underdog, just like the Tarhells are.  Makes
    rationalizing loses in big games a lot easier.
    
    JD
29.111RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Mar 21 1991 19:3430
    Wait a minute, JD. I'm older than you, son, and, hence, have been a Sox
    fan longer than you've been alive. 
    
    And, if I'm pissed at Roger or Wade or Ellis or anybody that I think is
    a bonehead, I'll come out and say it.
    
    I used to despise Dwight Evans. The guy pissed me off because he would
    hit 20 HR's a year but they would usually come when the Sox were up or
    down by 10 runs. And he always seemed to get picked off first. It was
    not fashionable to criticize Dewey, "The greatest right fielder in
    baseball". Well, I felt then that Winfield was better and still feel I
    was correct.
    
    But, to Evans' credit, he ended up with quite a career and I found
    myself changing my tune.
    
    As for you, Glenn, I am not starry eyed. You got a problem with my
    analysis of that big fat pig, Gedman? Huh? 
    
    And while we're at it, how can I forget to castigate John "My nose gets
    in the way of the game" MacNamara. Why he didn't put Stapleton in to
    play 1B in Game 6 in '86 still puzzles me. He did it all year long yet
    he kept the guy who taught Mike Dukakis how to grow one eyebrow glued
    to 1B. 
    
    And, yes, /Don, I think Kevarian and Gedman in a 100 yard waddle would
    be a tough call.
    
    Rich
    
29.113MCIS1::DHAMELKill me with Cadbury Cream EggsThu Mar 21 1991 19:5411
    
    George Kevarian once beat Carl Lewis to an *open* hot dog stand.
    
    JD, and when have the Sox ever been the favorite going into the World
    Series?  In our lifetime, that is.
    
    Rich,  I can't really tell if you're serious or not, but that note had
    me rolling on the floor.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.114Or izzit "Pizza the Hut?"CARROL::LEFEBVREBorn at the right timeThu Mar 21 1991 21:175
    JD, give it up.  It's not funny anymore.
    
    Rich, speaking of Keverian, whatever happened to Jabba the Hut?
    
    Mark.
29.115AXIS::ROBICHAUDSnuffy'sSeenMoreChokesThanHeimlichFri Mar 22 1991 10:345
    	Rich, it's obvious you've been out of the state for a while.
    George Keverian went on a slimfast diet and has trimmed down to
    around 450 lbs.  Hey JD how's the beard coming along?
    
    				/Don
29.116CAM::WAYSame old, same old, Jimmy Rain...Fri Mar 22 1991 11:061
Who is George Kevarian?
29.117He looks like Eddie Andelmans twin.CUBIC7::DIGGINSWhat the hell is that?Fri Mar 22 1991 11:1110
    
    George Kevarian is the speaker of the house in the Mass. senate.
    The man never met a donut he didn't eat, or a hot dog, or a sausage,
    or a pizza, a twinkie, a ding dong, an entire turkey, any buffet,
    or a baby's arm holding an apple.
    
    The man is an obese pig.
    
    
    Steve
29.118CAM::WAYSame old, same old, Jimmy Rain...Fri Mar 22 1991 11:1413
Thanks Steve.

Bill Cibes, the Connecticut State Treasurer is no stranger to the 
training table either.  

Perhaps we could have a real down home, old fashioned PORK OFF....

Set 'em up like Mr Creasote in Monty Python and see which one
explodes first!

Yeee-haha, it's Friday!

'Saw
29.119Hello. Domino's?METS::DERRYFri Mar 22 1991 11:162
    I don't think he's the speaker any longer.  Didn't he run for 
    treasurer or something?
29.120CARROL::LEFEBVREBorn at the right timeFri Mar 22 1991 11:194
    Yeah Karen, he ran for treasurer and was soundly defeated.  He's been
    seen doing the McDonald's, Burger King, Wendy's, KFC circuit.
    
    Mark.
29.1217221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Mar 22 1991 11:208
    George was Speaker of the House since 1984.  He ran for Treasurer this
    past year, coming in second to Bill "The Prince of Darkness" Galvin in
    the Democratic Primary.  Galvin lost to Joe Malone in the finals.
    
    Keverian had been a long-time legislator from Everett and worked his
    way up the leadership ranks.
    
    John
29.122He heard that treasurer's get free McMuffins.CUBIC7::DIGGINSWhat the hell is that?Fri Mar 22 1991 11:228
    
    I'm dyin! HA HA HA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
    
    Mr Creosote, that's him!! Just one more cracker....
    
    
    
    Steve
29.123He's supposedly a good guy... too much of a pol, thoSACT41::ROSSBobKnight &gt; DeanSmithFri Mar 22 1991 12:063
Howie Carr of the Herald, when referencing the big guy uses:

	"George Keverian (DEM: Papa Ginos)"
29.124REFINE::ASHEYou're watching 3CP1, All-Russian TV...Fri Mar 22 1991 12:571
    No, no... it's one more after dinner mint... wafer thin...
29.1257210::MGILBERTPaul Tsongas for PresidentFri Mar 22 1991 13:014
    
    A democrat in papa ginos is a true oxymoron. The guy who owns papa
    ginos makes Jesse Helms look like a liberal.
    
29.126Mass Politics - worst in the nationLEAF::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is walking!!Fri Mar 22 1991 13:2710
"Chubby George" took over for Tom McGee, beating him in a commitee election 
to be Speaker.  McGee was a power hungry ignoramus (similar to Bulger [Senate 
President]).  At the time everyone, including myself, felt it was a good thing.

As time went on, Keverian became a lacky for Dukakis, and they even know in 
Conn. how popular the Duke was at the end.

=Bob=

BTW - JD is growing a beard?  This I gota see.
29.127too muchHPSRAD::SANTOSBo, get a Pump for your hipFri Mar 22 1991 13:337
    I forget who said it but I broke ribs laughing after hearing it.



    - How do you balance the Mass. state budget?

    - Take George Keverians lunch money for a month.
29.128Joe Malone was the right choice!NRADM::GALVINo..........|||| CandlepinsFri Mar 22 1991 13:378
    RE: .121
    
    Hey John, taking shots at my Uncle Billy......Not nice  :-)  
    
    Only kidding, I am a devoted republican, and no relation to the Prince
    of darkness.
    
    RTG
29.129No no no, I'm quite full, thank you.KEPNUT::DIGGINSWhat the hell is that?Fri Mar 22 1991 13:517
    
    Thanks Walt! I couldn't quite remeber if it was a cracker or a 
    mint! too funny..
    
    
    
    Steve
29.130RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOUn Rosalind der schplatFri Mar 22 1991 13:589
    Mark,
    
    Whattsa matter, a little truth hurt?
    
    Sox fans caint take any criticism at all.
    
    Boo Hoo
    
    JD
29.131CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Mar 22 1991 14:003
    Please take the Python and Kevarian stuff to the Junk Note.  Better
    yet, take the Kevarian stuff to NOTED::MASSACHUSETTS.  There's plenty
    of bitching in there about the state of the state.
29.132CARROL::LEFEBVREBorn at the right timeFri Mar 22 1991 15:459
       <<< Note 29.130 by RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Un Rosalind der schplat" >>>
    
    JD, you claim that fans are gushing in the Sox notesfile.  If you took
    the time to check, you'd have found that the Sox file has been
    uncharacteristically quiet over the last several weeks.
    
    Please try to keep up.
    
    Mark.
29.133EARRTH::BROOKSPick up the pace ....Fri Mar 22 1991 15:508
    
re .117
    
>    George Kevarian is the speaker of the house in the Mass. senate.
 
    As I heard a comic say at a club two weeks ago :
    
    "Speaker of the House !? ... He *IS* THE F--KING HOUSE !" :-)
29.134RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Mar 22 1991 17:1224
    Hey JD.....you been drinking too much of your node lately? I don't know
    why you still are on the Sox fans' case but it's getting a little
    stale. 
    
    Loving the Sox is a religeous experience. But, when you look at them
    objectively, how can you favor them to win anything? They seldom have
    more than 1 or 2 frontline pitchers, have the team speed of the
    National Snail Sprint Club, are in the middle of the pack fielding-wise
    and have some thick-armed guys who can crank the ball over "Da Wall"
    once in awhile. The last time they were favored to win anything big, I
    believe, was in 1946 versus the Cardinals. Yet, even then, they had
    little for pitching as witnessed by the starting of Denny Galehouse in
    the crucial 7th game. Same ole Sox.
    
    Mac, chill out. How can one divorce the Red Sox from Massachusetts
    politics? Ole Honey Fitz leading the Royal Rooters, Mayor Curley
    offering to buy Landsdowne St and "give" it to Yawkey to extend left
    field. It's tradition. And, with the crew of lackies on Beacon Hill in
    Mass, it's no wonder that they are targets once in awhile.
    
    Now, with that said, Let's Go Sox!!!!!
    
    Rich
     
29.135:^)CARROL::LEFEBVREBorn at the right timeFri Mar 22 1991 17:238
    Rich, don't get me wrong.  I didn't say *all* Red Sox.  Just the vast
    majority of them.  Remember, I'm a life long Red Sox fan and I'd like
    nothing better than to see them win the whole enchilada.
    
    But the constant rah rah, "my team can do no wrong" of the Red Sox
    noters is .......
    
    JD
29.136AwesomeRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Mar 22 1991 17:269
    That's good, Mark........it almost worked. 
    
    I was all set to lay into JD again, then I saw when you were born and
    remembered his Pecs and, I thought better of it.
    
    BTW - Anyone see Luis River's muscles this spring?
    
    Rich
    
29.137RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOUn Rosalind der schplatFri Mar 22 1991 18:0537
    Rich,
    
    First, my comments in the ACCnote were explained pretty well by Glenn
    today.  I may not have put them forth too well.
    
    I believe that there's a "We is underdogs" mentality instilled in some
    Boston area fans (especially Sox and Broons fans...)   Everytime they
    win a division its because of overachieving - other teams (especially
    teams from LA and New York underachieve, using this logic...)
    
    I think many Sox fans contradict themselves.  They'll argue for eons
    about how talented their players are, but will then say "Oh woe, our
    team doesn't have the talent to win it."
    
    I've seen it *too* many times.  I've heard demin-god praise for
    Clemens, Burks, Boggs, Reed, Pena, Greenwell - yet the team doesn't
    have the talent.
    
    The acquisitions were pooh-poohed.  The Sox, in case you haven't
    noticed, picked up some good ballplayers.  Darwin was slated to be
    Houston's #1 man.  Jack Clark is a good power man and an RBI man.  
    
    What I said this year, which was deemed horrible by so-called Sox fans,
    was suggest that IMO, the SOX have at the *LEAST* stayed at the same
    talent level as last year, but IMO, have gone up in talent.  And given
    the fact that these poor, underdog, underachieving, striving for
    greatness, boys-town choir boys have *WON* the Eastern Division 3 of
    the last 5 years, I had the audacity to say I *EXPECT* them to win the
    division, and the pennant, and fell that anything less is a failure and
    an underachievement.
    
    You can remain the a perfect Sox fan - always excusing or bitching
    about failure, and attributing success to overachievement, but I'll
    take a little more objective view and say that the Sox are one of the
    best teams in baseball.  
    
    JD
29.138CAM::WAYSame old, same old, Jimmy Rain...Fri Mar 22 1991 18:138
>    noticed, picked up some good ballplayers.  Darwin was slated to be
>    Houston's #1 man.  Jack Clark is a good power man and an RBI man.  

Yes.  I've heard that Darwin has evolved quite nicely, and could be
the missing link in the Sox rotation.  That is if he doesn't wind
up the Beagle in the Dog House.

'Saw
29.139STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Mar 22 1991 18:449
    re the last few:
    
    If this year's Red Sox finish first or second in the AL East, they'll
    have performed about to expectations.   Lower than that has to be
    considered disappointing.   It would take at least an ALCS win for talk
    of "overachieving" to have any merit.
    
    
    py
29.140RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Mar 22 1991 18:5047
    JD,
    
    I've been down your road too many times before. I've waited for Opening
    Day with baited breath expecting the likes of Dick Gernet, Eddie
    Bressoud, Ike Delock, Jim Pagliaroni, Billy Consolo and a cast of
    thousands to bring home the banner last cast in 1918. I believed in
    those teams. Right up until that fat pig Gedman blew a catch and that
    Dukakis-eyebrow Buckner failed to bend over low enough to catch a dinky
    grounder.
    
    That's when I figured it out, JD. I had come into so many seasons
    trying to make the Sox the best team in baseball in my mind. I made
    excuses for 35 years. Now I don't make any excuses. I look at the Sox
    with a cynical eye.
    
    Sure, they picked up Clark but who's gonna play shortstop?
    
    Sure, they got Darwin and Young but will they fill Boddicker's shoes?
    
    Who will steal more than 10 bases for them?
    
    Will Mike Greenwell still play left field like Horace Clarke played 2nd
    base?
    
    Who will set up Reardon, Murphy?
    
    Will Murphy be a 1990 or 1989 model?
    
    Can we really expect Harris and Kiecker to do what they did last year?
    
    Why is it that Pawtucket has the potential to have a starting infield
    with everyone over 30 years old?
    
    Can Mo Vaughan hit a major league curve or is he another Sam Horn?
    
    What happened to Carlos Quintanna's neck?
    
    Be serious here. The Sox are not a lock on anything. They have zero
    depth on the bench at 3rd or 2nd base. Naehring is still a rookie and
    untested. Romine still your premier outfield bench man? Matt Young and
    Danny darwin are question marks. Jack Clark is a distraction and will
    piss of Morgan very quickly.
    
    Sorry, JD - too many questions for cynical ole me.
    
    Rich
    
29.141Can't get too confidant as a Sox fan....DECWET::METZGEROh No, I've said too much...Fri Mar 22 1991 18:5525
I'd say the Sox stayed even talent wise this off season....

gains were Clark, Darwin and Young (19 losess is a gain)
Losses were Boddicker and Anderson


Some of the players might have had career years last year (Harris,Bolton,Keicker
Gray and QUintana) while others (Greenwell,Brunansky, Boggs) under achieved
compared to previous years.

I'd say that since they won the division last year and no other team has 
noticably improved to any extent that they would be the favorites to win the 
division this year. I wouldn't consider it overachivement if they do so. 

I would consider it underachievement if they don't. Talent wise compared to the
whole of MLB I would consider it a slight overachievement if they win the 
whole she-bang but nothing like a '69 Mets team.

I expect great things out of the Sox this year....I anticipate a total 
collapse and a 3rd place finish :-(


Metz
 
29.142CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Mar 22 1991 19:196
    It was sportwriters and "experts" around the country that picked the
    Sox to finish 5th in '86.  It's not the Boston fans crowning the Sox as
    overachievers.  It's all of baseball.  Afterall, the Toronto Blue Jays
    were supposed to be the dominant team in the A.L. East over the last 5
    years.  The Sox were supposed to be middle of the pack to contenders
    (but not winners) depending on whose column you read.
29.1437221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Mar 22 1991 19:277
    As far as the Bruins go, there is a "perception" that because of the
    seemingly large number of injuries they have to overcome every year
    that they are lucky to go as far as they do.  I do count myself among
    that crew but also don't claim to know how their injury rate compares
    to the rest of the NHL.
    
    John
29.144RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOUn Rosalind der schplatFri Mar 22 1991 19:3349
    Rich,
    
    Be as cynical as you want.  So can other Sox fans. I'll show some
    optimism. If you or other fantastic SOx fans don't like it, tough
    cookies.
    
    Losses:  Boddicker - I feel Darwin will be an adequate replacement.
             Anderson - C'mon, the guy isn't Cy Young, or even Bob Stanley.
                        IMO this wasn't a super loss.
    
             Barrett - no loss here.
    
    Gains:   Jack Clark - Power, RBI's, can play first.  Big Gain.
             Darwin - will replace BOddicker (who will, IMO, end up with a 
              worse record than Darwin.
             Young - this is a no lose proposition.
    
    Outfield:  Greenwell, Burks, and Brunasky.  Not bad at all.  SO what
    about Greenwell's defense - lots of clubs field worse then him - look
    at the Dodgers outfield - YIKES.
    
    3B:  Boggs - great hitter, and his fielding has been defended to near
    death by Sox faithful
    
    SS:  Naehring/Rivera - Sox offense can spare having a no hit SS like
    Rivera.  So what if Naehring is just a rookie - every player was once a
    rookie.  THat's how they start out.  
    
    2B:  Jody Reed - again, listening to many Sox fans, this is a premier
    ball player.
    
    1b/dh - Clark, Quintana, etc. - Again, good offense, thought there may
    be a sligt defensive defeciency.
    
    C:  Tony Pena - handles the staff well.  Leadership.  Good offense.
    
    Pitching:  The Sox Fan proclaimed greatest pitcher of all time taking
    the mound every 5th day.  Darwin a good #2 man.  Kiecker and the boys
    have a  year under their belt.  Is Dopson healthy?  
    
    Some question marks, but a better staff then they've had in a few
    years.
    
    A very good baseball team.
    
    My prediction:  SOx win the east.  Sox fans say "What a great
    overachieving, blue-collar bunch of guys.  Beat the overachieving,
    media-hyped teams from Toronto.  Who would have ever predicted they'd
    win the division (insert many pats on back...)"
29.145So I exaggerate, but not much...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Mar 22 1991 19:3612
    Fact is, for every slightly objective Sox fan who's disappointed but
    thinks they've done okay *lately*, there're a hundred vindictive 
    sportswriters, loutish radio talkshow hosts, knee-jerk slobs on the 
    street and displaced Dan Schneiders who bellow "choke!" the minute 
    the Sox slip a half-game out of first.  The reason I asked JD how 
    long he lived here was not to question his fanhood now that he's 
    gone as he presumed, but because I couldn't believe that he had not 
    observed this phenomenon while he was here.
    
    glenn
      
29.146RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOUn Rosalind der schplatFri Mar 22 1991 19:4524
    Glenn,
    
    I did observe the phenon of teh vindictive sportswrites, etc.  But I
    didn't find it much different from the hype in NY.  The papers there
    can be mighty cruel on teams and players, as can the fans.
    
    In fact, when I first went to Boston I was amazed how the papers seemed
    tame, and that they were always picking the Boston teams to win their
    divisions - didn't seem objective at all.
    
    Now, the 78 team choked.  No question about it.  
    
    I feel that the real phenom in Boston is the double standard used in
    talent appraisal - individually, players are praised as the best at
    their position, but collectively, they are identified as a band of
    average players, banding together to fight large odds, reaching down
    and overachieving to win another division title.
    
    Not directed at you, but the real problem is that Many Sox (and Boston
    fans) really believe the "Best Sports Fans in the World" propoganda
    line they've been spoon-fed, and they also cannot take criticism.
    They can dish it out, but they caint take it.
    
    JD
29.147RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Mar 22 1991 19:5022
    OK, let's look at a lineup as follows:
    
    1B - Cecil Cooper
    2B - Denny Doyle/Jerry Remy
    3B - Butch Hobson
    SS - Rick Burleson
    LF - Jim Rice (vintage)
    CF - Fred Lynn
    RF - Dwight Evans
    C - Carlton Fisk
    
    You have here a lineup that could blow the SOX off the 1991 edition.
    Add Yaz as a DH and you have one of the most potent lineups the Sox
    ever had. Yet, they couldn't win the WS. Heck, they only won one
    pennant. 
    
    I'll root for them till I die but nobody is gonna look at that team and
    tell me they are the best in the AL East. Hey, if they win it all, I'll
    be happy. If they lose, .....I'm conditioned.
    
    Rich
    
29.148WMOIS::JBARROWSBruinsasaurusFri Mar 22 1991 20:095
    re: .143
    
    John,
    
    FYI-The Bruins are leading the NHL in most man hours lost to injuries.
29.149RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Mar 26 1991 13:275
    Small blip in the Richmond paper this morning about Wade Boggs escaping
    serious injury when he fell out of a moving van. Any details?
    
    Rich
    
29.1507221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Mar 26 1991 13:385
    Not really.  He and Debbie were driving back from dinner going about 25
    MPH, he leaned against the door and it popped open.  Got some cuts and
    bruises, missed a couple of games.  
    
    John
29.151CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onTue Mar 26 1991 14:541
And she said "Sh*t, I missed again!"
29.152MCIS1::DHAMELBlinded by the LiteTue Mar 26 1991 14:565
    
    "Wade, look!  Is that Margo I see over there on the sidewalk?"
    
    "Wher.....AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
29.153EARRTH::BROOKSPick up the pace ....Tue Mar 26 1991 16:023
    re .152
    
    HA HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!!!
29.154This scab on my elbow is preventing me from extending...VAXWRK::SCHNEIDERThe crux of the biscuitTue Mar 26 1991 17:044
    If Wade gets off to a slow start, you know we'll hear about this
    again...
    
    Dan
29.155MCIS1::DHAMELBlinded by the LiteTue Mar 26 1991 17:083
    
    Was this Debbie's way of telling him to "hit the road?"
    
29.156CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 26 1991 17:113
    Wade is hitting .170 in the grapefruit league.  I'd say this was a slow
    start and it occured before he fell out of the truck.  I haven't heard
    any excuses yet.
29.157Take a ridalyn, Wade...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 26 1991 17:5119
    Boggs is a real piece of work, though.  You or I or the next guy falls
    out of the car in a drunken stupor and the next day at work we're 
    making up a story about walking into a door, out of embarrassment.  
    But no, Boggs proceeds to go on about his life flashing before his 
    eyes and how the incident puts his .170 average into perspective and
    the thing turns into a damn melodrama.  The press kinda blushes and 
    grins at all this, nonetheless taking it all in for the next day's 
    papers while Boggs makes a fool of himself.
    
    Last year it was the night he was held at knifepoint after showing off
    his revolver to some strangers outside a bar.  Before that, Margo.  But
    the worst part is that Boggs seems to think that we're all interested
    in his exploits, so he wears this stuff like a badge of honor.
    
    This is a strange man, Wade Boggs...
    
    glenn
      
29.158MPH as a benchmarkNEMAIL::LEARYMTue Mar 26 1991 18:3222
    Youse guys got me thinking about Gedman again. Rich, your mention way
    back in .104 or so about his fat butt lumbering after the "passed ball/
    wild pitch" and his tremendous acceleration down the line makes it
    clear to me that we can utilize his speed or lack of as a benchmark.
    Lets' make the fat turd famous.
    
    Just as we use a VUP as a measure of performance, we can use Gedman's
    time down the line as a base measure of performance( must be close to
    1/2 hour)
    
    Let's call it a MPH (Mister Potato Head)
    Therefore Rich Gedman has a MPH of one; Ellis Burks must be measured
    at least at 15 Mister Potato Heads ( the greater the MPH, the greater 
    the speed)
    Anyone who has a (-) MPH is either designated as dead or living in an
    iron lung. (Mike Marshall might be close)
    
    Think of the Gedman MPH as akin to the famous Mendoza line (he of that
    famous .188 batting average)
    
    
    
29.159CARROL::LEFEBVRERather be trout huntingTue Mar 26 1991 18:463
    :^)
    
    Mark.
29.161RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Mar 26 1991 19:0824
    That's it....I just spewed half-eaten peanut M&M's all over my
    keyboard!
    
    What a great idea - MPH's.
    
    Let's see, we'll take a look at the starting lineup:
    
    Boggs      - 1.5 MPH
    Reed       - 2.25 MPH
    Naehring   - 2.5 MPH
    Greenwell  - 2.0 MPH
    Burks      - 4.0 MPH
    Brunansky  - 1.5 MPH
    Quintanna  - 1.25 MPH
    Pena       - 1.75 MPH
    Clark      - 1.5 MPH
    
    Boy, what a bunch of burners. Team MPH must be around 2.0 MPH with some
    blazin speed coming off the bench, to boot.
    
    I love it...a lasting tribute to that big fat pig.
    
    Rich
    
29.162CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onTue Mar 26 1991 19:1110
My mph?

Probably around .4 MPH.  I'm the slowest thing since Heinz ketchup.

I mean, if you want me to run a 100yd sprint, pull the trigger on the
gun, go have a coffee, think about taking a leak, go find the mens'
room, take a leak, go get a coffee refill, and you'll still have time
to hold the tape for me at the finish!

And NO, I'm NOT in an Iron LUng......
29.164CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onTue Mar 26 1991 19:194
It may be half baked, but I think if it were voted on the eyes would
have it.....
    

29.165Was you moon-walking when tested?NEMAIL::LEARYMTue Mar 26 1991 19:217
    Say it ain't so 'Saw!
    
    You cain't be slower than Geddie! Nobody physically can be. Tell me
    you ain't below the MPH line! Hath thou been running in quicksand
    
    MikeL
    
29.166COMET::WADEI won't....back....down.Tue Mar 26 1991 20:376
    
    'Saw,
    
    	Does this mean we should time you with a calendar or a sun dial?
    
    Claybroon 8^]
29.167CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onWed Mar 27 1991 11:3123
I've always been slow.  From what I've read about running, the muscle
fibers that make you fast or slow are a mix of two types.  All the
studies show it's hereditary.

Now my dad was a superb quarter miler in his time, but I don't guess
I got any speed from him.  I take more after my uncle on my mom's
side -- big kind of a guy, excellent lineman material.

I'm not the slowest guy on the rugby team, but fortunately, rugby
is one sport where you don't need to be a speed burner to play
the game.  (thank god!)  And like Mac has said, knowing the game
allows you to conserve energy and play heads up...

I might be faster than Gedman.  I mean, I can see the finish line
better because I don't have slits for eyes...

Maybe this summer we can get Gedman to that track in Northboro.
We can hogtie the WelcherDinz(tm) and get him there too.  AFter
Dinz runs around in his jock, then I can race Gedman and we
can determine my MPH.


'Saw
29.168RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Mar 27 1991 12:315
    'Saw, Nell Carter can run faster than Gedman. Roseanne Barr can run
    faster than Gedman. And, I know you can catch Roseanne Barr....8^)
    
    Rich
    
29.169CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onWed Mar 27 1991 12:596
>    'Saw, Nell Carter can run faster than Gedman. Roseanne Barr can run
>    faster than Gedman. And, I know you can catch Roseanne Barr....8^)

Yeah, now that you put it in those terms.  Although I'd much rather
catch the lass who plays CJ on LA Law.....;^)    

29.170RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOKenya Roools againWed Mar 27 1991 15:365
    Dana Keicker sure has been pitching well in the Grapefruit League.  I
    think the Sox pitching staff will be fine this year.  No doom and gloom
    from me.
    
    JD
29.171CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 27 1991 15:459
29.172MCIS1::DHAMELRedSox: Building momentum since '18Wed Mar 27 1991 17:0211
    
    THIS IS DEFINITELY THE YEAR THE RED SOX WILL GO ALL THE WAY.  THE WHOLE
    NINE YARDS.  THE BIG ONE.  THE ENTIRE ENCHILADA.  THE KINGDOM AND THE
    POWER AND THE GLORY.  JOT DOWN THIS NOTE TOPIC AND NUMBER, SO YOU'LL
    KNOW WHERE YOU READ IT FIRST.  NEVER MIND, I'LL MAKE A NOTE OF IT MYSELF
    SO I CAN RE-POST IT IN OCTOBER.  SO IT IS WRITTEN.  SO LET IT BE DONE.
    AMEN.
    
    Dickstah
    
    
29.173RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Mar 27 1991 17:034
    
    
    DICKSTA IS TO BLAM!
    
29.174A friend of mine wants to know if the Sox are home April 10-13SHALOT::MEDVIDwe were never being boringWed Mar 27 1991 17:100
29.175MCIS1::DHAMELRedSox: Building momentum since '18Wed Mar 27 1991 17:263
    
    4/11 is the home opener, 12th off, 13th vs. Cleveland
    
29.176METS::DERRYWed Mar 27 1991 17:262
    Yeah.  The Sox are home on the 11th and the 13th, against Cleveland.
    Both games start at 1:05.
29.177Chin Music, Roger's #1 song look out TerryCHIEFF::CHILDSQualified Mentally for HP ParkingWed Mar 27 1991 17:386
 and home all of October...

 ;^)

 mike
29.178MCIS1::DHAMELRedSox: Building momentum since '18Fri Mar 29 1991 17:4812
    
    Anybody out there like to have Mike "I'm the best and deserve to play
    every game" Marshall?  Seems he walked out of spring training,
    urinating and lamenting about taking his ball and going home about
    not playing every day.
    
    To his credit, though, I believe he *is* leading the Sox in hitting
    this spring.  Gorman says he's tried to shop him, but nobody seems
    interested.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.179CARROL::LEFEBVRERather be trout huntin'Fri Mar 29 1991 18:003
    He's back in camp today.  Says he took a "personal day".
    
    Mark.
29.180CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Mar 29 1991 18:012
    His wife was arrested after she decided to rearrange the cones in the
    parking lot to voice her displeasure over Mike's situation.
29.181Noone wants him cuz he gots a (-) MPHNEMAIL::LEARYMFri Mar 29 1991 18:031
    
29.182Ken Coleman's great callNEMAIL::LEARYMFri Mar 29 1991 18:357
    Here's a spot of trivia.
    
    In April of 1967, we all know that Elston Howard of the Yanks broke
    up Billy Rohr's no-hitter.  Who was the Yankee that hit the long drive
    to left that Yaz went back,dove and made a great catch in order to
    preserve the no-hitter at that time?
    
29.183Tom TreshMETS::DERRYDonnieWahlbergLightsMyFireFri Mar 29 1991 18:381
    
29.184I'll take "The Esophagus" for 100 Alex.CUBIC7::DIGGINSWhat the hell is that?Fri Mar 29 1991 18:437
    
    Ooooo Karen your little miss quick trivia for $1000 today aren't you!
    8^)
    
    
    
    Steve
29.185CARROL::LEFEBVRERather be trout huntin'Fri Mar 29 1991 18:445
    She's got a book handy.
    
    "Cheat, cheat, ne'er beat."
    
    mark.
29.186/Don should organize the next outing.METS::DERRYDonnieWahlbergLightsMyFireFri Mar 29 1991 18:504
    I did have to look up the question.  That took some effort.
    
    What do I win?  Free tix to the next Tigermania?  They'd have to be
    free if I gotta sit next to REK again.  
29.187Are we on this year or not ?EARRTH::BROOKSPick up the pace ....Fri Mar 29 1991 19:062
    If we had gone and did the M-thang like we were supposed to last year
    Karen, you wouldn't have been stuck next to REK ..... :-)
29.188Even tho ya kinda cheated!NEMAIL::LEARYMFri Mar 29 1991 19:107
    Congrats, karen
    
    You win an infinite number of tickets to Hawk's and 'Saw's male strip
    show. Bring your barf bag.
    
    MikeL
    
29.189WORDY::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is walking!!Fri Mar 29 1991 19:255
    Damn - I knew the answer to that off the top of my haid.
    
    I even would have given the prize to Karen.
    
    =Bob=
29.190METS::DERRYDonnieWahlbergLightsMyFireFri Mar 29 1991 19:407
    =Bob= - Quick.  That's the name of the game.  
    
    Okay, here's an easy one.  October 2, 1978.  What was the count to
    Bucky before he hit the homer?
    
    Doc, you never showed at the last one.  I woulda been stood up if I'd
    have went.
29.191FDCV07::KINGJesse's Jets!Mon Apr 01 1991 00:075
     C'mon Karen.. I had your brothers rolling in their seats the whole
    night.. You are still mad about telling me that JD was a scrawny
    little wimp.. :-}
    
    REK
29.192BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Mon Apr 01 1991 11:043
    Ellis Burks walked out of camp.  No reasons given in the report.
    
    lEe
29.193try againGIAMEM::MIOLAPhantomMon Apr 01 1991 11:096
    
    
    April Fool to you too.....
    
    
    Lou
29.194I'd never stand you up ... you're the only one 4 me ...EARRTH::BROOKSPick up the pace ....Mon Apr 01 1991 12:211
    I wuz there on Pats Day ! Ask John, Hawk or /Don !!!!!!
29.195CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onMon Apr 01 1991 12:4110
Doc WAS there on PATS day.  He had his camera, and was gonna ask
me to hold it until he realized the high state of inebriation that
I was in at the time.  I think I remember him asking my brother
to hold it.

I was faced, and had the time of my life, but I remember that
Doc WAS there on Pats day.....


'Saw
29.196METS::DERRYJane's Addiction in...Fitchburg?!Mon Apr 01 1991 12:518
    I'm thinking about organizing the next Tigermania and I'll let 
    you know Friday if my plastic can swing it.
    
    Yeah, that's all fine and good but it wasn't the Pats day game that
    were were supposed to do it at.  I could swear it was to have been
    at the last Tigermania.  (The one where Frank was sweating buckets.)
    
    Might be wrong... it's happened before.
29.197CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onMon Apr 01 1991 12:5810
>    at the last Tigermania.  (The one where Frank was sweating buckets.)
    
I was not sweating buckets.  

I was sweating like a man on Drugs....8^)


'Saw


29.199This year's Pats day?COGITO::HILLMon Apr 01 1991 13:365
    Sooo, Speaking of Pats Day, who will be there this year? I have tickets
    in the grandstand, but if there's a group going to the game, I'd definitely
    be up for meeting youze for a few hunderd bee-uhs. The Rat?
    
    Tom
29.200I'll be at the Rat just before the bartender.VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Mon Apr 01 1991 13:490
29.202CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onMon Apr 01 1991 14:0211
Tom, 

Look for the guy in the rugby t-shirt, with a PropButt(tm).

If Mac doesn't wear a rugby t-shirt, then it's 100% chance it's
the Chainsaw.

Otherwise, you're looking at 50-50 that it's me....


'Saw
29.2037221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Apr 01 1991 14:164
    I'm going and I may have an extra ticket.  Send me mail if interested
    (Lufay?).
    
    John
29.204To the tune of "Take mE out to the Ballgame"RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOYo Sugar Ray, you sweating alot!Mon Apr 01 1991 16:4512
    Take me out to the bleachers
    Meet me early in the Rat
    Buy me some beers and sportsrooms(tm)
    I don't care if Hawks got no hair
    Cuz its BLAM BLAM BLAM
    On the Sportsters
    I they don't get faced, they wear dockers
    Cuz its Saw, Ninja, and /DOn 
    at the nexted ballgame...
    
    
    
29.205EARRTH::BROOKSThe 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLVMon Apr 01 1991 19:3014
    John, I'm interested in that ticket.
    
    Walt, I need a best man ... are you interested ?
    
    Hawk, would you serve as chaplain ?
    
    John_H, will you bring a BIll James Abstract to serve in place of a
    Bible ?
    
    Saw, will you be the bridesmaid ?
    
    :-)
    
    Doc
29.2067221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Apr 01 1991 19:399
    I'll know for sure by mid-week.  After that, I've sort of offered it to
    Lufay first if he's interested, then if neither person takes it Doc,
    it's yours.
    
    The Bill James Abstract hasn't been printed in a couple of years. 
    Since I sort of work with them, I'll bring a 1991 Elias Analyst.  Might
    as well help keep my friends in business.
    
    John
29.207CARROL::LEFEBVREDon Henley must dieMon Apr 01 1991 19:426
    Sorry, John.  I mentioned to Hawk that I'm goin' a fishin', so I cain't
    make the game.  I just assumed he told you.
    
    Thanks for the offer.
    
    Mark.
29.208EARRTH::BROOKSThe 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLVMon Apr 01 1991 19:421
    You're a real pal Ninja ! :-)
29.2097221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Apr 01 1991 19:504
    Lufay, Hawk didn't tell me.  Sorry you cain't be there.  Doc, you move
    to the top of the waiting list and I'll let you know midweek.
    
    Ninj
29.210REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Bert Campanaris?Tue Apr 02 1991 04:1212
    I'd take a ticket...
    
    Mo Vaughn got sent down... SHOCK!!! I bet he's up after the amount of
    time needed to extend a year of arbitration.
    
    Rob Murphy got traded to Seattle...
    
    To quote a commercial Doc,  "No my brother, you have to buy your
    own..."   I'll come on the white horse (watch it Dickster) and
    sweep Karen away at the last minute....
    
    -Walt
29.211CARROL::LEFEBVREBeen dealt a pretty good handTue Apr 02 1991 11:5613
    Walt, you always did have a hankerin' for horses.
    
    Anyway, I'm not disappointed at Vaughn being sent down.  He's too
    valuable a commodity to have sitting on the pine for the first 6 weeks
    of the season.  He admitted himself that he got off on a slow start and
    felt he deserved to be sent down.  He also said he'd be back soon
    <insert Arnold's voice-over here).  He'll tear up the International
    League for a month or two and should be up by early June.
    
    Now, if Vaughn got off to a monster spring training, then I'd say yeah
    to the arbitration tactic, but not this time.
    
    Mark.
29.212Where is everyone??!!METS::DERRYJane's Addiction in...Fitchburg?!Mon Apr 08 1991 17:326
    Sox up 5-1.  Jack Clark hit a grand slam.
    
    You guys should be ashamed of yourselves... I had to get the score
    from the Grateful Dead file.
    
    Gotta love baseball.
29.213VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Mon Apr 08 1991 17:4612
>>    You guys should be ashamed of yourselves... I had to get the score
>>    from the Grateful Dead file.

Everyone's in the RED_SOX conference, where they've received instructions on
how to get onto the distribution list for updates.

BTW, end of 5:

Toronto		1-4-0
Boston		5-4-0

Clemens has 5 strikeouts.
29.214MCIS1::DHAMELI need some sensible shortsMon Apr 08 1991 17:4810
    
    >    You guys should be ashamed of yourselves... I had to get the score
    >    from the Grateful Dead file.
    
    Imagine!  People trying to discuss a serious subject like the Dead 
    and other people jumping in with Red Sox clutter!  It's a good thing
    people don't do that in *this* file. 8*)
    
    Dickstah
    
29.215Yowza!!RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThen Came BronsonMon Apr 08 1991 18:553
    It's OVER!  SOx up 5-1 - the champeenship is RIGHT around the CORNER!
    
    JD
29.216(:^)ECAMV3::JACOBHEY, gimme back my hair!!!!!Mon Apr 08 1991 19:016
    Lessee, Clemens will go, say, 21-6 this year, that coupled with a few
    other wins will make the Soxx 26-136 this year, and they'll take second
    in the ALeast.
    
    JaKe
    
29.217DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Apr 09 1991 09:083
    No way, JaKe, no way with Jack Clark now on a 648 RBI pace!  :*)
    
    lEe
29.218162 HRs too!WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Apr 09 1991 09:272
       Been listening to Eddie Anvilhead, eh lEe?
                                     Denny
29.219AXIS::ROBICHAUDThoseBallsAndStrikesAddUpFastTue Apr 09 1991 12:464
    	Jack Clark is Gawd!  The Sox are going all the way.  Is it to
    early to order ALCS and World Series tickets?
    
    				/Don
29.220REDSOX conference?CADSYS::CAVETue Apr 09 1991 12:575
COuld someone tell me the name of  the REDSOX conference.  I somehow lost
it in the shuffle.


                                                    thanks, Alan
29.221VAXWRK::RED_SOX7221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 09 1991 13:061
    
29.222Shufflin' AlongBOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Tue Apr 09 1991 13:463
    Was that the "World Series Shuffle", kinda like the Superbowl Shuffle?
    
    lEe  :*)
29.223And this is a worst-case scenario! ;-)WORDY::NAZZAROPursue, capture, incarcerateTue Apr 09 1991 14:2314
    Roger Clemens goes 31-2.
    Matt Young goes 19-10.
    Danny Darwin goes 22-6.
    Tom Bolton undefeated at 17-0.
    Greg Harris is 12-3, but gets injured.  Dana Kiecker replaces
    him in the rotation and goes 10-4.
    
    Bullpen = 19-7.
    
    Red Sox overall record = 130-32.
    
    PENNANT FEVER SWEEP HUB!
    
    NAZZ
29.224STAR::YANKOWSKASMeghan's daddyTue Apr 09 1991 15:136
    > Was that the "World Series Shuffle", kinda like the Superbowl Shuffle?
    
    Nah, more like the Curly Shuffle.  :-)
    
    
    py
29.225MCIS1::DHAMELI need some sensible shortsTue Apr 09 1991 15:387
    
    A fair projection, Nazz, but how do you see the Red Sox losing 32 games
    this year?  Are the umps that much against them?  Anything less than
    undefeated is a choke job. 8^))).
    
    Dickstah
    
29.226COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Tue Apr 09 1991 15:4915
29.227CARROL::LEFEBVREDigging for fireTue Apr 09 1991 15:526
   >	How `bout 103 - 61 ????
    
    Why the 2 game playoff?
    
    Mark.
    
29.228????RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONancy Says: DomedomedooooTue Apr 09 1991 16:053
    Are the Sox in town July 13,14,15,15,17???????
    
    JD
29.229MCIS1::DHAMELI need some sensible shortsTue Apr 09 1991 16:194
    
    Yes, if your town happens to be in Minneapolis (or thereabouts) or
    Chicago.
    
29.230CARROL::LEFEBVREDigging for fireTue Apr 09 1991 16:204
    Negative, Sarge.  In Minny on the 13th and 14th.  In Chi-town the 15th
    through the 17th.
    
    Mark.
29.2317221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 09 1991 16:255
    All-Star break is July 8-10.  Nearest home game before the 13th is the
    7th against Detroit.  Nearest home game after the 17th is on the 18th
    against the Twins.
    
    Ninj
29.232CARROL::LEFEBVRENancy sez: Stop spreading the newsTue Apr 09 1991 16:313
    When is the Fayster supposed to rule on Clemens?
    
    Mark.
29.233To dream, the impossible dream, to .....WORDY::NAZZAROPursue, capture, incarcerateTue Apr 09 1991 17:078
    Thought I should be conservative in my prediction.
    
    Please note that I even figured in an injury factor (although
    not to Roger of course, since he's superhuman).
    
    HTH,
    
    NAZZ
29.234JACK CLARK BREAKS WIND - PARADE IN OCTOBER !!!EARRTH::BROOKSThe 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLVTue Apr 09 1991 17:211
    
29.235AXIS::ROBICHAUDThoseBallsAndStrikesAddUpFastTue Apr 09 1991 17:275
    	Doc, if that's the result of Clark breaking wind then I'm sure
    we could get up a collection amongst Red Sox fans to give Jack a
    seasonal pass to Taco Bell.
    
    				/Don
29.236Clark - A great hitter, but a leader ?EARRTH::BROOKSThe 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLVTue Apr 09 1991 17:3411
    Hey, go for it. It jut cracks me up how Sox fans seize on a savior
    every year .... Pena last year for his leadership. This year it's
    Clark, who is supposed to be a clubhouse leader, and long-ball threat.
    I can see half of that ... but this guy has also been a pain in the ass
    in SF, StL, and San Diego last year. If Jim Rice showed 10% of the
    'leadership' Clark did in SD last year, he'd been shot.
    
    Sox fans had better hope Clark hits 30 HR's (likely), and doesn't P.O.
    too many people (a crapshoot) ....
    
    Doc
29.237CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Apr 09 1991 17:3910
29.238AXIS::ROBICHAUDCeaser,U.S.Grant,Patton,JackClarkTue Apr 09 1991 17:442
    
    
29.239"No can hit curve ball. Bats are afraid." STAR::YANKOWSKASMeghan's daddyTue Apr 09 1991 19:279
    > Sox fans had better hope Clark hits 30 HR's (likely), and doesn't P.O.
    > too many people (a crapshoot) ....
    
    ...and that AL pitchers take a while to realize that Clark is to the
    Red Sox what Pedro Cerrano was to the Indians in the movie "Major
    League".
    
    
    py
29.240Good movieEARRTH::BROOKSLip reading, New Taxes, Kurds :-(Tue Apr 09 1991 20:103
    "I say f--- you Jo-Boo, I'll do it myself !"
    
    He was too funny !!!!
29.241DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Apr 10 1991 09:528
    Doc, where is this stuff about Clark being the new leader?  In the Sox
    file?  I really haven't seen it in here, but I admit I've done an awful
    lot of skipping due to being out a few days, and the slow response time
    I've experienced with CAM.
    
    Lee
    
    
29.242CAM::WAYOnly thing better 'n rucking is...Wed Apr 10 1991 11:4414
>    lot of skipping due to being out a few days, and the slow response time
>    I've experienced with CAM.
    

Slow response time is due to network problems north of us.  Unfortunately
we've been on our backup line a lot, and all of our outside access
is slow.

Plus, from what I've heard, there's some political stuff surrounding these
problems, so it's anyone's guess when it will all work out.....

'Saw    
    

29.243MCIS1::DHAMELI need some sensible shortsWed Apr 10 1991 11:589
    
    THE RED SOX PICK UP ALL THESE GREAT PLAYERS AND SIGN THEM FOR TWICE THE
    NATIONAL DEBT AND WHAT ARE THEY DOING?  THEY ARE PLAYING .500 BALL,
    THAT'S WHAT!
    
    T'ROW DA BUMS OUT!!!
    
    Dickstah
    
29.244CARROL::LEFEBVRESox fans back to earth, film @ 11Wed Apr 10 1991 12:032
    
    
29.245AXIS::ROBICHAUDEdsels,Ishtar,DrM,'91RedSoxWed Apr 10 1991 12:544
    	The Red Sox STINK!  Trade everybody on the team!  Fire the manager!
    What's the number for the Skydome ticket office?
    
    				/Don
29.246CAM::WAYOnly thing better 'n rucking is...Wed Apr 10 1991 12:554
      <<< Note 29.245 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Edsels,Ishtar,DrM,'91RedSox" >>>
                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Don't forget the Rainbow, Pro300 etc etc etc....
29.247let's not forget the Lynx either :*(CSTEAM::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Wed Apr 10 1991 15:128
    They made howmany?  ~128 units
    
    ...and sold ~78!!!!
    
    
    2+ years in development????
    
    
29.248Up there with Kapri?REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Ralph Carter?Wed Apr 10 1991 17:203
    Re: Lynx
    We had one of those, tested most of it once the product was shipped.
    Great deal, can we have our test unit back?
29.249DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Apr 11 1991 09:466
    Well, the Sox are now 1 for 3 on the road, but *UNDEFEATED* at home!
    
    Projecting this out results in 27 wins away, 81 at home for a .666
    winning percentage!  :*)
    
    lEe
29.250WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Apr 11 1991 10:152
       And clark's down to a mere 54 HRs already!
                                      Denny
29.251What a bunch of bums!AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Apr 11 1991 10:521
    
29.252CAM::WAYOnly thing better 'n rucking is...Thu Apr 11 1991 11:551
As usual Morgan left in pitcher in just a tad too long last night....DUH!
29.253COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Thu Apr 11 1991 14:4310
   Isn't it also true that they are one for three on the road.... and
   haven't won a game at home?
                           (just trying to help)

   Wasn't that Stottlemyer, who pitched for the Jays the son of the guy
   that pitched for the Yanks? And back in 70? 71? he traded his wife,
   house, kids, cars, for another pitcher's wife, house, kids, cars? Guy
   named Kechik, or Kechim, or somethink like that?

   Mike JN
29.254CAM::WAYOnly thing better 'n rucking is...Thu Apr 11 1991 14:4611
Well, 


So far this season, I'd say Gray is holding the Caterer's Award....
If I could serve up meatballs like that, I'd be a chef in the city,
not a software engineer.....

And Morgan...was he asleep again?  Yeah, I know, I know, I saw him walking
around in the dugout, but that doesn't mean he wasn't asleep.....

'Saw
29.255STAR::YANKOWSKASMeghan's daddyThu Apr 11 1991 14:579
    re Mike JN:
    
    Yes, Todd Stottlemyre is Mel's son.  
    
    The two Yankees who were involved in the wife-swapping incident were
    Fritz Peterson and Mike Kekich(sp?).
    
    
    py
29.256A babe to be named later ?EARRTH::BROOKSNew World Order = Business As UsualThu Apr 11 1991 15:171
    How bout some details ....
29.257BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Apr 11 1991 15:303
    You mean Todd traded his mother?  For who?  :*)
    
    lEe
29.258CARROL::LEFEBVREWillin'Thu Apr 11 1991 15:573
    A MTBNL.
    
    Mark.
29.259CARROL::LEFEBVRETime for a WitnessThu Apr 18 1991 19:414
    Clemens shuts down KC, 1-0.  Saberhagen gives up an unearned run. 
    Reardon with the save.  
    
    Mark.
29.260Surprised no one commented on the CLEMONS/SWIDELL! matchup Saturday...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 18 1991 19:447
    
    Clemens' ERA now stands at 0.36 after three starts and three wins.
    No one's going to convince me that he's not the best pitcher in
    baseball.  Clemens is GOD!
    
    glenn
    
29.261Roger certainly earning his $$$ so farSTAR::YANKOWSKASMeghan's daddyThu Apr 18 1991 19:494
    Actually Clemens had an off day today.  He walked a batter.
    
    
    py
29.262Who says all he can do is pitch ???SHALOT::HUNTWorking For The ClampdownFri Apr 19 1991 00:156
    Yep, and he got himself indicted or charged or arraigned or whatever,
    too, for the bar brawl incident from a few months back.
    
    Quite a fun-filled couple of days for the Rocket Man.
    
    Bob Hunt
29.263WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Apr 19 1991 01:482
       'Psycho' Lyons is back wif the Sox!
                                       Denny
29.264CARROL::LEFEBVRETomorrow People, where is your past?Fri Apr 19 1991 11:277
    Glenn, you bet your bottom dollar that when Clemens has an inevitable
    slump, the naysayers will be here in force.
    
    Bob, actually Clemens was indicted on a lesser charge - hindering arrest
    (misdemeaner) rather than assaulting a police officer (felony).  
    
    Mark.
29.265just laying in the weeds awaiting..it'll happen, it's a givenCHIEFF::CHILDSYesterday, we'll it seemed so cool...Fri Apr 19 1991 12:214
 "what you talkin' about Willis...I mean Mark"....  ;^)

 mike
29.266CHIEFF::CHILDSYesterday, well it seemed so cool...Fri Apr 19 1991 13:256
 Another thing about his "highness"' fast start. The umps are giving him
 a strike zone slight smaller than the Atlantic Ocean so as not to give
 his "highness" more ammo in his upcoming appeal with Fay...

 mike
29.267YawnSALEM::DODAWeather'sHere,WishUWereBeautifulFri Apr 19 1991 13:324
Yeah, those those opposing hitters are intentionally swinging and 
missing too....

daryll
29.268forced tooCHIEFF::CHILDSYesterday, well it seemed so cool...Fri Apr 19 1991 13:515
 What choice do they have Daryll? They know the ump isn't going to give them
 a fair shake...

 mike
29.269Roger :== Demi-god Swindell is too BLAM(tm)WFOV11::MORRISONThat was just a dream.Fri Apr 19 1991 13:595
    
    I see Mike is wielding the BIG spoon again. Stir that pot!
    
    Bull~
    
29.270COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Fri Apr 19 1991 15:0313
29.271AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Apr 19 1991 15:062
    	Hey you whineykisseyfaces ROGER CLEMENS is 3-0 against Bret
    Saberhagen.
29.272DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Apr 19 1991 15:065
    Yeah, the guys a bum.  The Umps are scared of him.  The Sox ought to
    trade him.  That's the ticket, send him to ah, um, er, Detroit.  Yeah,
    Detroit.
    
    lEe
29.273COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Fri Apr 19 1991 15:2110
29.274Fraud!AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Apr 19 1991 15:241
    
29.275WMOIS::RIEU_DRead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Apr 19 1991 15:381
       Brett evun wun too Sigh Jungs!!!
29.276CARROL::LEFEBVREA who a say dere ain't no Jah?Fri Apr 19 1991 15:403
    Yeah Slasher, but what's Roger's record against Mr. Stewart?
    
    Mark.
29.277Mark, you mean the guy who makes those microwave pizzas?AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Apr 19 1991 15:441
    
29.278WFOV11::MORRISONThat was just a dream.Fri Apr 19 1991 15:585
      No, I think he means Jimmy Stewart. As far as I know, Roger never
    faced Monty Stratton :^>
    
    Bull~
    
29.279Beyond beliefSALEM::DODAWeather'sHere,WishUWereBeautifulFri Apr 19 1991 18:0518
How's the song? "Stretch the truth till it snapped?"

You guys are gettin' there. 

Yessir, Roger's got the whole umpires association in his right 
pocket. Owns 'em...

And all it took was a few choice words last fall.

Pretty soon, guys like Leary and Davis will be swearing up a 
storm and callin' all those umps real nastly names so they can 
git this preferential treatment too...

Listen to yourselves for pete's sake.

Get a grip.

daryll
29.280Sure, I'll go along with it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Apr 19 1991 18:3322
    
    Daryll, I may be wrong, but I'm just assuming that these guys are 
    being facetious to stir things up.  Doesn't really matter either way.  
    I do know that in the 6-8 starts I see Clemens pitch a year from my
    seat in dead centerfield, there's no evidence of preferential 
    treatment, just great control.  It's tougher to get a true measure of 
    balls and strikes on TV because the outfield camera angles are almost 
    always to the right of the pitcher ('cept that beautiful SkyDome
    overhead shot), but being there is to see what it's all about.
    
    It's also funny how all those opposing players, being the fierce
    competitors that they are, just trudge back to the dugout with their 
    eyes lowered after Roger punches them out, and then proceed to 
    deliver all those somber but respectful praises to him in the 
    lockerroom aftermath.  I suppose it's all just part of the game, paying
    the mandatory respects to the pampered star for the good of the game.  
    They wouldn't want to be critical of Clemens or the umpires after one 
    of his masterpieces, or the commissioner wouldn't like it, and
    somebody's pay might get cut or something.
    
    glenn
      
29.281ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Apr 19 1991 18:586
    
    
    re:  .264
    
    Mark, you're just sticking up for Roger because you both drive
    Volvo's!
29.282CARROL::LEFEBVREA who a say dere ain't no Jah?Fri Apr 19 1991 19:088
    Groaner, my car was made in the same country as your yuppie Prelude.
    
    Hope this hurts.
    
    BTW, I hope my new nephew keeps you up at night when warmer weather
    requires an open window at night.
    
    Mark.
29.283UPWARD::HEISERyenom ruoy em dneSFri Apr 19 1991 19:221
    I drive a big burley Suburban.  A Man's Truck!
29.284CAM::WAYOnly thing better 'n rucking is...Fri Apr 19 1991 19:299
Re the Suburban:

	Alright.  I find the Suburban a tad long to handle easily around
	town, which is why I chose my mid-size pickup, but GMC makes great
	trucks......

	Manly, yes!

'Saw
29.285VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Fri Apr 19 1991 19:514
>>    I drive a big burley Suburban.  A Man's Truck!

They let you buy it anyway, Mike?

29.286just say no to yuppiesZEMI::HEISERyenom ruoy em dneSMon Apr 22 1991 15:553
>They let you buy it anyway, Mike?
    
    That says a lot since I own one and you don't.
29.287COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Mon Apr 22 1991 16:088
   I find it difficult to believe that any real SPORTS Noters would be
   DRIVING Yuppie type, Quiche biting, foreign vehicles; let alone
   actually OWN one.

   I have to assume it's a mistake, and they'll be getting a Manly car as
   soon as possible.

   Mike JN
29.288CAM::WAYOnly thing better 'n rucking is...Mon Apr 22 1991 16:437
Agreed Mike JN....

If it don't say Ford, Chevy, Dodge or GMC, it ain' worth bein' in.
If it ain' got 4 Wheel Drive, you'd better have a good reason why too....

Hope this helps,
'Saw
29.289LAGUNA::MAY_BRGraphic sexual innuendoMon Apr 22 1991 16:456
    
    Is a company-owned Ford Taurus with the paint peeling off from the
    Arizona sun manly?  It's DARK blue, and I figure that's gotta be manly
    in Phoenix.
    
    Bruce
29.290CAM::WAYOnly thing better 'n rucking is...Mon Apr 22 1991 16:5922
Manly, Bruce, very manly.

However, there are some rules to be followed when driving a company car.

First, keep a crash helmet on the front seat.  When you get into those
"situations" with other cars where you're vying for space, put it on.
It lets people know you're serious.

Second, never miss an opportunity to try to ram that car into the smallest
possible space.  Yell out the window "Outta my way, this is a COMPANY car!"
and you'll be surprised at the success you have....

Finally, install automatic door openers on all four doors.  When you're
in a position to block other cars from sneaking up beside you, flip all
the doors open.  Your car can double it's "area" that way, and take up
more space.

Finally, go everywhere as fast as possible, in as low a gear as possible.


Hope this helps,
'Saw
29.292WAYBAK::LEFEBVREEverybody knows this is nowhereMon Apr 22 1991 22:116
    Don't *ever* mention 'zero defects' and Ford, Chevy or GMC in the
    same note *ever* again.

    Mark.    


29.293AXIS::ROBICHAUDTue Apr 23 1991 15:028
    	Hiya Bruce.  I thought I saw you on Donohue the other day when
    he was discussing the World Cup.  Was that you?  8^o
    
    	Sox are rolling.  Ellis Burks is GAWD!  For this week anyway!
    Read my lips - "ROGER didn't lie, Cooney did!"  When do the World
    Series tickets go on sale?
    
    				/Don
29.294LAGUNA::MAY_BRGraphic sexual innuendoTue Apr 23 1991 15:2629
    
    Sorry guys, I've been working hard.  You see, the company has this
    *GREAT* incentive trip for us sales guys.  If we work REAL hard and
    make about 200% of our quota, we get to go to Palm Springs.  WOW!! 
    Imagine getting a chance to rub elbows with the only Boknows who isn't
    on crutches.  As you can imagine, after moving to Phoenix I'm really
    motiviated to work hard so I can spend a week in a desert with a bunch
    of geriatics in golf carts.  And no, if you don't make your quota, you
    don't get two weeks in P.S.
    
    Now about this Clemens thing, I think Mike Childs is onto something,
    only it's much bigger than we all thought.  I believe it has to do with
    the NEw World Order and the Trilateral Commission.  I believe Roger
    Clemens is a central character in the biggest conspiracy ever (and
    don't forget, I'm the guy who uncovered that Doc is a Celtic fan).  See
    if this makes sense:
    
    Roger and the umps, as we all know, are in cahoots.  The umps have
    given Roger a strike zone half the size of 'saw's butt (were talking
    BIG).   When the batters realize that they have this "cheeky" strike
    zone, they naturally become despondent and lethagic, and just give up. 
    Soon everyone on television will be watching our heroes, playing our
    NATIONAL pastime being despondent and lethargic.  This is just what
    Roger, George Bush, and Gorby want.  We will have no choice but to
    subconsciously emulate our heroes, so that we too, become despondent
    and lethargic.  Once this happens the New World Order can EASILY be put
    into place as none of us will care anymore.  Kinda scary, huh?
    
    Bruce  
29.295Time to break out the spoonWFOVX8::MORRISONThat was just a dream.Tue Apr 23 1991 16:0012
         I know it's only 2 weeks into the season, but I might as well
    try and stir things up.
         
         How long do you bat a .250 hitter lead-off and a .100 hitter
    second? Shouldn't some thought be given to a little lineup change?
    Sure, Wade went 2 fer 3 last night and sure the Sox have won 5 in
    a row, but they're wasting Greenwell's .290+ average by having no
    one on base in front of him. The win streak are due to suprisingly 
    good pitching and timely hitting from the middle of the line-up.
    
    Bull~
    
29.296if you believe the conspiracyZEMI::HEISERJCM 900 rules!Tue Apr 23 1991 16:394
>    only it's much bigger than we all thought.  I believe it has to do with
>    the NEw World Order and the Trilateral Commission.  I believe Roger
    
    ...and don't forget the Illuminati.
29.297Can't believe everything you read...COGITO::HILLTue Apr 23 1991 16:514
    Don't believe a word of it. It's all Neo-Fascist Dogma, designed to
    undermine the very value system, nay, the very essence of what it means
    to be a 'mercan. If you do fall for this, you might as well buy a pair
    of season tickets for the Exit 16W Nets....
29.298EARRTH::BROOKSI'm having an old friend for dinner...Tue Apr 23 1991 16:587
    Waitaminute ... I thought there was a Vatican-Mafia connection, at least
    with the AL. The National League has a simular set up with the
    Trilateral Commission, the Yakuza (I hear Bruce is well-connected there
    - helps to have those Bay Area roots huh ?), and a possible, but
    tenuous link with the Medialian Drug Cartel ....
    
    
29.299CAM::WAYI believe I'll dust my broom...Tue Apr 23 1991 17:183
Actually, it's all those people who decided to read Dianetics, or Diuretics,
or whatever it's called....

29.300CNTROL::CHILDSWhen it matters, Dean never winsTue Apr 23 1991 18:339
 But Bull, if there were guys in front of him on base Greenwall would be
 hitting 150 not 290 so the choice is obvious. Let Greeenwall hit 290
 cause they're overpaying him....

 when does my idol pitch nexted?

 mike    

29.301AXIS::ROBICHAUDQuicheLorraine,Soccer,BoatingTue Apr 23 1991 18:454
    	Tonight Mike.  You got your official ROGER CLEMENS Bosco glass
    all set?
    
    				/Don
29.302Childs Knows, .... well, not SPORTS! RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 18:537
    It pleases me to no end to realize that one of Dean's biggest bashers
    also thinks Roger Clemens is a stiff!
    
    Haw haw!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
29.303LAGUNA::MAY_BRGraphic sexual innuendoTue Apr 23 1991 19:185
    
    Actually, the Mafia-Vatican connection comes in from another direction.  
    Consider this:  Clemens is from Texas, JFK was shot in Texas.  Everyone
    knows the CIA and the Mafia are the ones who shot JFK.  Coincidence?  I
    think not!  Clemens was the 2nd gunman on the grassy knoll.
29.304let us not forget they both whine like babies and chokeCNTROL::CHILDSWhen it matters, Dean never winsTue Apr 23 1991 19:298
 Never said he was a stiff Chris, just overrated, over pampered, and above
 criticism just like Deano...

 oh I forgot both are poor misunderstood souls who are unfair attacked by
 mere mortals like myself....

 mike
29.305Your hero.METS::DERRYCheck's in the mail, eh?Wed Apr 24 1991 10:114
    Mikey, I knew it was only a matter of time before you came around...
    
    Rog - 4-0.  30 scoreless innings...  7 k's, 0.28 ERA.  He wasn't even
    "on" lasted night.
29.306And the OTHER chump Boggs, hit his 3rd homerBUILD::MORGANWed Apr 24 1991 10:136
    4-0 (2 against the Blue Jays), 1 earned run in four starts, 0.28 ERA,  
    30 consecutive scoreless innings.  As I've said before Mike, you're
    watching a HOFer and you can't even bring yourself to appreciate his
    greatness.
    
    					Steve
29.307DECXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Apr 24 1991 10:144
    Whatever, Roger won again last night.  Sox in sole posession of 1st
    place right now.
    
    lEe
29.308major league :)))))COBRA::DINSMOREWhat ever happened to Bill Duggleby?Wed Apr 24 1991 10:319
    Lee,
    
    Are you a sox  fan now?  Just curious, anyways, wave the pennent
    
    flags folks the sox are in first, and its already april!
    
    
    dinz
    
29.309WFOV12::MORRISONThat was just a dream.Wed Apr 24 1991 10:3611
    
    BTW, before I become as misunderstood as "God" & Deano, I'm a Sox
    fan and I'm not trying to bash any players. Just asking a fairly
    obvious question.
      Sure it was just a matter of time before Wade started hitting, but
    how long should Turnpike Joe have waited before doing something?
    
    Bull~
    
    
    
29.310The cella dwella's!CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Wed Apr 24 1991 11:2610
Dinzee you still rooting for that sorry excuse of a ball club, the Skanks?

Tsk..tsk..tsk.. those who live in glass houses and all that other malarkey.

GO RANGERS! HA HA HA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!



Steve
29.311CAM::WAYI believe I'll dust my broom...Wed Apr 24 1991 11:419
Well, I for one am very pleased at the way Roger is performing this year.

The man wanted more money, got it, and now is filling the bill.  Regardless
of what anyone else thinks about him, I think he's a great pitcher.

And what's with Wade Boggs and the home runs.  Do you think Wade transfered
his sex addiction to a steroid addiction?  8^)

'saw
29.312COBRA::DINSMOREWhat ever happened to Bill Duggleby?Wed Apr 24 1991 11:414
    hi digger,
    
    just having some fun,  you know  my style by now..  ha..
    
29.313HOF a non-factor according to Mr. ChildsRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Apr 24 1991 12:3611
    > As I've said before Mike, you're watching a HOFer and you can't 
    > even bring yourself to appreciate his greatness.
    
    Heck Steve, Mike watches a *current* HOFer all the time (Dean Smith)
    and bashes on him ceaselessly.  You don't expect Clemens to get
    different treatment just cause he's destined for Cooperstown, do ya?
    
    Ha!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
29.3147210::MGILBERTPaul Tsongas for PresidentWed Apr 24 1991 13:3610
    
    RE: .303
    
    Bruce must believe in reincarnation. If memory serves me correctly
    Roger wasn't even born when JFK was shot. He might have been a twinkle
    in his mother's eye though.
    
    But it's a nice theory Bruce :-) :-)
    
    
29.315RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockWed Apr 24 1991 13:5014
    Just because some player is going to be a HOFer doesn't mean one has to
    like that player, or fall down over them, or j**k off to posters of
    them.
    
    Geez.  Roger is a great pitcher.  I don't think he's the greatest ever.
    I sure hope Morgan doesn't burn him out, or Roger doesn't burn out and
    slide down the stretch.  With Darwin out, the Sox really need him to
    *never* lose.
    
    re:   Chris - how the hell does Dean Smif get into the Red Sox note? 
    The only connection I can see is that the Sox haven't won since 1918,
    and Dean's only one once in 31 years.... ;-)
    
    JD
29.316BUILD::MORGANWed Apr 24 1991 14:016
    JD, 
    
    Never said you had to like, fall down, or lacquer up over posters to
    APPRECIATE a great ball player.
    
    					Steve
29.317RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockWed Apr 24 1991 14:1714
    Steve, 
    
    I know.  Some folks seem to think that you have to love a guy cuz he's
    a HOFer.   That's what always got me into trouble with Bird. 
    Appreciate he's playing, just never felt he was the greatest thing
    since sliced bread.  And for that I'd get nailed.
    
    Anyway, its too early in the season for me to start proclaiming anyone
    as super.  It's a great start, but one sore shoulder or other ailment
    wipes it all out.
    
    Hey, Roger is on my DECfantasy team, so I'm happy!
    
    JD
29.3187221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 24 1991 15:044
    Roger was born in 1962, if memory serves me correctly, and his name is
    William Roger Clemens.
    
    John
29.319RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockWed Apr 24 1991 15:055
    So, he shouldn't really be ROcket Roger, but something like Ballistic
    Bill, or Whiffling William...
    
    
    DJ
29.320CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Apr 25 1991 15:145
29.321Multiple smileys intendedWFOV12::MORRISONThat was just a dream.Thu Apr 25 1991 16:198
        
       I must have contracted something along the lines of the
    Dinsmore Kiss of Death. The minute I start pluckin' on the Holy
    Chicken Man, he wakes up.
       He's still a bum!
    
    Bull~
     
29.322AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Apr 25 1991 18:216
	I was listening to Eddie Anvilhaid on the way home last night and 
he decides to call up Western Union and send a telegram to Wade Boggs 
urging him to continue swinging for the fences and wanting to win, instead 
of caring about personal goals.  It was pretty funny.

				/Don
29.323MR4DEC::WENTZELLBuilt for comfortThu Apr 25 1991 18:3516
RE: Boggs and personal goals


Intersting note related....last night Boggs got his 1,800th career hit, 
it was a double to left.  When they flashed this on the diamond vision, the 
crowd gave Boggs a standing O.  The camera zoomed right in on Boggs and for 
about 15-20 seconds it seemd like he had no idea why everyone was cheering (he 
was standing on 2nd with his back to the diamond vision).  When he started 
looking around to figure out what was going on, he looked behind and you could 
see that he realized what all the noise was for.  He then gave a nice 
tip-o-the-cap to the crowd.

Didn't seem to concerned with his own hit count last night.

FWIW,
Scott
29.324FDCV07::KINGJesse's Jets!Thu Apr 25 1991 19:036
    How come we have never seen the SLasher and eddie at te same
    dinner table... Hmmmmmmm.....
    
    REK
    
    many :-}
29.325It has to be said ...LUNER::BROOKSI'm having an old friend for dinner...Fri Apr 26 1991 13:213
    re .323
    
    Boggs is a good actor that's all ...
29.326Knew it was comingMR4DEC::WENTZELLBuilt for comfortFri Apr 26 1991 13:576
 RE:                          -< It has to be said ... >-


Yup, I would have been quite dissapointed if no one had said it.

8^)
29.327CAM::WAYI believe I'll dust my broom...Fri Apr 26 1991 14:1310
Kind of gives you that familiar "homey" feeling, ya know.

Like coming home on a Friday night, knowing how comfortable your furniture
is, sitting down, putting your feet up on the coffee table, knowing that
first beer is going to go down so well.


If it hadn't been said, it would feel so uncomfortable in here.....

'Saw
29.328MCIS1::DHAMELI need some sensible shortsFri Apr 26 1991 14:146
    
    I wish Boggs would bunt more, cuz he can lay one down with the best of
    'em.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.329the widest strikezone in the game...CHIEFF::CHILDSWhen it matters, Dean never winsFri Apr 26 1991 15:287
 Tough to get excited about 1800 hits when 1300 of them are girly mon little
 dribblers just out of the shortstop's reach....

 Steve, it's hard to appreciate a guy who has an unfair advantage....

 mike
29.330That amazing expanding, contracting Fenway strike zone...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Apr 26 1991 18:568
    
    >               -< the widest strikezone in the game... >-
    
    Who, Boggs or Clemens?  You're coming so fast with these conspiracy
    theories, mike, I can't keep up with ya...
    
    glenn
    
29.331Clemens suspension upheldCHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Apr 26 1991 20:143
    Before the Red Sox conference became unreachable, I saw a note that
    reported that Vincent has upheld Clemen's suspension.  He will get a 5
    game suspension and will miss his next start.
29.332easy to figure out..AGNT99::CHILDSAlmost as misunderstood as ClemensSat Apr 27 1991 02:526
 Cmon Glem widest strikezone is Clemens, smallest strikezone is Boggs...

 ;^)

 mike
29.333CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Mon Apr 29 1991 12:059
How come we never see /Don and Eddie at the same table?

Because there both in the kitchen licking the pot!

Sorry /'er it had to be said. 8^)


Steve
29.334VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Mon Apr 29 1991 19:013
>>    Before the Red Sox conference became unreachable

Yeah, sorry.  Someone pulled a cable, leaving us in a network by ourselves.
29.335AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 09 1991 10:584
    	You mean to tell me that Roger didn't pitch a shutout again
    last night?  What a bum!
    
    				/Don
29.336Nice slide, Wade.CARROL::LEFEBVREGun Control:== Steady AimThu May 09 1991 11:144
    Yeah Slasher, the bum's ERA soared to 0.73.  And he's on the cover of
    SI to boot.
    
    Mark.
29.337AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 09 1991 11:565
    	Agreed Mark.  The guy's ERA has more than doubled in his last
    two starts.  I think the Red Sox should trade him now while they
    still can get something for him.
    
    				/Don
29.338WhaddayagonnadoMR4DEC::WENTZELLNotbadNotemptyNotaliveThu May 09 1991 12:089
29.339REFINE::ASHEWhatever happened to the JoboxersThu May 09 1991 14:199
    I hope Mr. Clemens realizes he's keeping the juggernaut of the Detriot
    (tm?) Tigers from first place.  Sure, if Gullickson was 6-0 instead
    of 4-0, who would be winning the AL East?  
    
    I think they should ban that 'do he's got.  He's probably got some
    styling mousse in it that he's using like Gaylord Perry.  Does he
    put it on before or after his Dockers?  Slasher, whaddya think?
    
    -Walt
29.340AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 09 1991 14:276
29.343CAM::WAYThe National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW!Fri May 10 1991 11:109
I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but the jeans advertised in those
commercials where the guys are removing the stump and playing that
manly game of full contact volleyball are Levi's jeans.

In fact, one of them is for Levi's 540s, the jeans designed for props.  ;^)

Great photo of Roger on this week's SI cover!!!

'Saw
29.344CARROL::LEFEBVRETake your instincts by the reinsFri May 10 1991 12:046
    Boston scored 5 in the 7th for a come-from-behind 8-4 victory.  Bolton
    finally got hit hard.  Franco's tater into the CF bleachers was a shot.
    
    Detroit and Toronto win to keep pace.
    
    Mark.
29.345LEAF::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is walking!!Fri May 10 1991 12:054
Hate those jeans with the button fly!  It's brutal when you have to go 
REALLY bad.

=Bob=
29.346CAM::WAYThe National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW!Fri May 10 1991 13:3717
Those are the 501 button fly.  Levi's also make a 505 regular fly,
a 519 I think, and the 540s.  If you're built like a prop, the 540s
feel REALLY comfortable.....

When I was in the FD, we used to have parade uniforms with wool pants,
button fly.  I used to carry the American flag a lot, so it was really
a bitch when you had your little parchesi cup on, and then had to
dump the beers you drank on the way to the parade, just before marching.

Undo seven buttons, move that parchesi cup, take care of business,
do up seven buttson, rearrange that parchesi cup, and then run back
to the head of the unit because the Chief was having a coronary about
"where's the American flag, where's the American flag????"

After two years, we finallyg got some new pants!

'Saw
29.347CARROL::LEFEBVRETake your instincts by the reinsFri May 10 1991 14:533
    What's this have to do with the Red Sox?
    
    Mark.
29.348Maybe sometin 2 do wif fly poppin'?CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Fri May 10 1991 15:251
    
29.349CAM::WAYThe National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW!Fri May 10 1991 16:5310
DUH!,  are you guys stupid.

The point was that our pants were SO old they were new the last
time the Sox won the series.

I mean, REALLY, you guys are slipping!

8^)

'Saw
29.350AXIS::ROBICHAUDLazarus,ThePhoenix,BroonsFri May 10 1991 17:024
    	Hey to me all these yuppified jeans are all the same anyhow.
     I look for the cheapest...
    
    				/Don
29.351CAM::WAYThe National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW!Fri May 10 1991 20:119
Shame on you Slasher!

Levi's jeans yuppiefied?  Bull hooey...

For a long time Levi's were all there were.  It's still pretty much all
I wear in jeans.  It's nice that they've come out with different styles
however, for those of us with ample gluteus maximus areas....8^)

'Saw
29.352FrankWa, U sayin you got a plate stacker????CSTEAM::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Mon May 13 1991 00:401
    
29.353CAM::WAYThe National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW!Mon May 13 1991 11:0218
Kev --

I wouldn't call it a plate stacker, more like a prop butt.  8^)

It's bigger now than I'd like, but by the end of the summer it should
be better. 

Alas, I'll never have the uplifted, cut up buttocks that Franz was drooling
over in SNL this season 8^)


And if I could wish for ONE thing, for ONE day before I die, I'd like
to have, just for ONE day, **BLAZING** speed.  I'd love to know what it's
like to go one-on-one with some guy down the sideline, turn on the jets,
and watch him eat my dust.  THAT'S what I'd like 8^)


'Saw
29.354He blacks out the Yank part tho' 8^)CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Mon May 13 1991 11:166
/Don wears "Big Yank" jeans. 2 for 9.99 at Woolworths.




Steve
29.355AGNT99::CHILDSWilt's heart was 2 sizes 2 smallMon May 13 1991 11:217
 Saw, at one time maybe not but now with the 5 or 6 different styles and the
 extra 10 bucks for the name Levi's classify as yuppiester leg warmers...

 and long before there was Levi's there were Wranglers....Lee's rule!!!

 mike
29.356CAM::WAYThe National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW!Mon May 13 1991 11:375
Oh, see I never pay extra money for my Levis.  I get them a Bob's stores,
and they're usually pretty cheap.  I mean, I could pick them up at a place
like The Gap, but there I'd pay the yuppie price...  8^)

'Saw
29.357RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon May 13 1991 12:4317
    Down on the farm, the PawSox swept a 3 game series with Richmond over
    the weekend. Pawtucket's pitching gave up 3 runs in 3 games. Quintall,
    just up from New Britain, pitched a no hitter Saturday. Morton looked
    good yesterday.
    
    Only homer was by Jeff Stone, the Sox' latest Chico Walker
    impersonator. Lancelotti continues to get a hit a game. Good looking
    shortstop named Valentin. Scott Cooper continues to UNIMPRESS. Marty
    Barret's younger brother, Tom, plays second for Pawtucket. Plantier
    looking polished and Vaughan looking more and more deadly. Eric Wedge,
    the catcher out of Wichita St very good defensively. Has yet to impress
    at the plate. 
    
    PawSox in first place now in IL.
    
    Rich
     
29.358RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon May 13 1991 12:447
    re - last
    
    My mistake....Qunitall did not pitch a no-hitter. He gave up no runs
    and 5 hits.
    
    Rich
    
29.359Inventor of the Jean machineJURAN::MCKAYMon May 13 1991 20:447
    Frank,
           Who are you kidding Bob's Stores is the yuppied Bob's Surplus
    and you know it 8*)  About the only difference in the gap and bob's
    stores is one's generally in a mall.........
    
    Jimbo
    
29.360REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to the Sugarhill Gang?Tue May 14 1991 03:502
    Do they sell power generators?
    
29.361CARROL::LEFEBVREDannyAterio,SDavisJR,GregHines,JDTue May 14 1991 11:433
    Well, Reardon was due.
    
    Mark.
29.362CAM::WAYThe National Inbreeding Finals -- Sign up NOW!Tue May 14 1991 11:4615
No way, Jimbo.

At least not the one in Manchester.  The prices are GREAT.  (And that
my friend, helps me decide where to shop).

Jeans, as I said, are cheaper, but not only that, I can usually save
about 25% on running shoes, which really helps out.  

Besides, I didn't see any rollerblades sold in the store, so it can't
be YUPPIE.....


Re the Sox:

	So it was reardon catering lasted night???
29.363CARROL::LEFEBVREDannyAterio,SDavisJR,GregHines,JDTue May 14 1991 11:494
    Not exactly catering, Saw.  Sox lead 3-2 with two outs and two strikes.
    The rest is history.
    
    Mark.
29.364CAM::WAYJose, did you diddle Madonna?Tue May 14 1991 12:259
Sox?  Which ones.  I didn't see the game -- although during the power outage
they did show some of the Canada-Japan rugby international.

So, lemme get this straight.  The Sox were ahead 3-2 and Reardon served up
a homer meatball to tie the game?

Reardon doesn't usually cater, that's usually Jeff Gray's responsibility...

'Saw
29.365NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue May 14 1991 13:038
> Reardon doesn't usually cater, that's usually Jeff Gray's responsibility...
    
    Gray catered in the tenth.  Not with the one big entree like Reardon, 
    but with a nice a little buffet spread nonetheless...
    
    glenn
    
29.366YAWNLEAF::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is walking!!Tue May 14 1991 13:1616
I was at the game.

Wicked bizzare when the lights went out.  The guy I went to the game with told
me he was in the middle of checking out a young lady, when ZAP!  He thought he
was being taught a lesson.  

Sherm Feller, who has been the PA announcer for as long as I can remember, led
the crowd in singing "Take Me Out to the Ball Game", and Ninj would have totally
lost it over all the beach balls that were bouncing around once the emergency
lights came on.

Between the blackout and extra innings, it made for quite a late night.  Lindsey 
doesn't seem to understand this, and was still up at 5:30.  Glad I
could come in to work to get some rest. ;*)

=Bob=
29.367CAM::WAYJose, did you diddle Madonna?Tue May 14 1991 13:185
Hell, I could pitch better than Gray, and on a good day, I'm lucky
if I have enough control to hit the Mike Childs Definition of the
ClemensZone(tm)....

'Saw
29.368FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue May 14 1991 13:183
    If I'd been there last night I could have been the "Stealth Ninja"
    
    John
29.369CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue May 14 1991 13:4511
29.370CARROL::LEFEBVREWelcome to the occupationTue May 14 1991 13:569
    What Mac said.
    
    Gray has been *very* effective this year and if you asked Reardon, he'd
    tell you that Gray effective setup role has been the primary reason
    Reardon's been so effective.
    
    Saw, do you guys get newpapers or TV in Hebron?
    
    Mark.
29.371STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue May 14 1991 14:016
    Agree that Gray has been effective, but the Sox need to take care not
    to overuse him (he had 17 appearances already going into this weekend's
    action).
    
    
    py
29.372CAM::WAYJose, did you diddle Madonna?Tue May 14 1991 14:3824
Mark --

Yeah, we get all kinds of TV...lots of Meningitis and Pneumonia too...


Seriously, yes, I do get TV.  I don't watch all that much TV, and I
skim the papers.  I don't read the box scores, but check the standings
most of the time.

The Red Sox games I have seen, Gray has screwed the pooch and stepped out
the door.  Admittedly, I don't watch many games -- I have to be in the
mood.  Plus, with rugby season in full swing, and things to do out and
around, I'm not home all much.

So, I haven't seen every opportunity that Gray has had.  The ones I have
seen....gee, maybe I'M the jinx....


On a related note, I did watch Sunday's game.  I thought the pitcher
that they brought in after Lamp (#50-something) pitched pretty well.
That game was funny for the comedy of errors in right field....


'Saw
29.373Remembering the childhood years 8*)JURAN::MCKAYTue May 14 1991 14:569
    C'mon now Frank Bob's surplus was a great store when it had one
    store in Middletown now it has three and they are all certainly 
    a bunch more upscale than the original.  Bob's Surplus was the
    spags of jeans at one time and it certainly isn't that now....
    
    I can also vouch for tv in Hebron and just about everything Frank
    says about the area 8*)
    
    Jimbo
29.374CAM::WAYJose, did you diddle Madonna?Tue May 14 1991 16:3918
You might be right Jimbo.

But see, I've been trained not to see yuppie stuff.  When I go to Bobs
I go to one of three sections:  Running Shoes, Work Boots, or Levis Unwashed
(virgin - no acid shit or stone stuff) 540 Jeans.  Occasionally, if 
heavy sweats (like Russell or Champions) are on sale I'll stop there.
And in the winter I pick up a couple of Five Brother chamois shirt or
flannels on sale.

Then I go drool over the cashiers (attractive HS girls ) while I pay
for my purchases...

After that I'm outta there.  

'Saw

PS  On the rare occasion I've seen a quiche eater in there, I snarl and
    bump into their skrawny little rollerblading bodies 8^)
29.375yeah I know we should get back to baseball, but...STAR::YANKOWSKASJose fiddles and diddlesTue May 14 1991 16:536
    re 'Saw, best place for low-price jeans is the Vanity Fair Outlet
    Complex (there's one in North Dartmouth, MA and one in Reading, PA). 
    Lee jeans 1/2 off *everyday*...
    
    
    py
29.376CAM::WAYJose, did you diddle Madonna?Tue May 14 1991 18:348
PY --

GREAT, GREAT p-name, there dude....

And if I'm up in that neck of the woods, I'll have to try to find those
places....

'Saw
29.377CHAINSAW DOES IT DOGGIE STYLE - FILM @11:00CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Wed May 15 1991 15:084
    >> I snarl and.....
    
    ;^)
    
29.378AXIS::ROBICHAUDWed May 15 1991 15:564
    	Did Gorman really want Tom Gordon for Mike Marshall?  It's no
    wonder he can't trade the guy.
    
    				/Don
29.379RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri May 17 1991 03:235
    Can anyone explain the dark spots on the outfield grass at Fenway? It
    looks like crap on the TV.
    
    Rich
    
29.380DASXPS::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri May 17 1991 10:033
    Rich, try washing your TV.  :*)
    
    lEe
29.381RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceSun May 19 1991 13:056
    Yeah, I know, LeE. Now that I'm down south, lordy knows what kind of
    critters get on the cable wires or what varmints make nests on my screen.
    
    Seriously, looked like lots of the Fenway OF was spray painted.
    
    
29.382Much more of this and it may be time to fire the groundkeeper...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon May 20 1991 00:2311
    
    > Can anyone explain the dark spots on the outfield grass at Fenway? It
    > looks like crap on the TV.
    
    New sod in some spots where the grass was supposedly killed by some
    fungus.  I agree, it looks like sh!&.  Worsted I've ever seen it.  But
    it still probably plays better than last year when there was no grass
    in those same spots...
    
    glenn
    
29.383Happy Mondays: Pills, Thrills and Bellyaches...CNTROL::CHILDSShot NG! He forgot to call the bankMon May 20 1991 12:4210
    
    > Can anyone explain the dark spots on the outfield grass at Fenway? It
    > looks like crap on the TV.
    

	That's the Clemens' spot. Roger's doctor told him that a black spot
        in that particlar area of the field would effect the home plate ump's
        vision thus increasing Roger's strikezone....

 ;^)
29.384CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon May 20 1991 19:126
    I must say I am impressed with the self-restraint of Mike C.  I figured
    he'd be in here today going on and on about Clemens' first loss of the
    season.  At the very least, I expected a mail message or two.
    
    Then again, Mike may still be recovering from the elimination of the
    Celtics...
29.385CNTROL::CHILDSand her head has no roomTue May 21 1991 11:064
 1 loss not enough ammo, just wait....

 ;^)
29.386AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Jun 20 1991 19:136
	Last week when Eddie Anvilhead had abandoned the Red Sox cause he 
said that the money spent of the free agents over the winter was the worst 
waste of money since the french built the Maginot Line.  I thought it was 
funny.

				/Don
29.387CARROL::LEFEBVREAspiring Fender BenderThu Jun 20 1991 19:154
    This, the same Addie Anvilhead, who proclaimed that this was the year
    of the Red Sox based upon these very same signings?
    
    Mark.
29.388STAR::YANKOWSKASIt just takes a smidgeon...Thu Jun 20 1991 19:3610
    Andleman isn't happy unless he has something to bitch about.  In the
    weeks that followed Mike Boddicker's defection to KC, he groused
    endlessly that the Red Sox were "futzing around", and kept saying
    "Sign Jackie Clahk no matter what the cost."  The Sox did just that
    (along with signing Egg Foo Young and Darwin), so then he changes his
    tune and says "the Sox were bidding against themselves, bla bla bla."
    Yawn...
    
    
    py
29.389Straight sports shows are just as boring... they all are...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 20 1991 19:506
    
    Sheesh guys, it's talk radio.  Like pro wrestling, you know what's
    going on, and you get what you pay for...
    
    glenn
    
29.390Hey, any of us in Sports qualifies! 8^)CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Fri Jun 21 1991 11:087
I can't believe the money anvilhead makes for being a total stiff!!
America! What a concept!



Steve
29.391"Mike appreciate the support your Hero"-Roger Clemens ;^)AGNT99::CHILDSI'll meet you by the 3rd PyramidFri Jun 21 1991 11:113
 Hey Don how'd my good buddy Clemens do the other night when he pitched I didn't
 catch the results????
29.392Next question?CARROL::LEFEBVREAspiring Fender BenderFri Jun 21 1991 11:1613
    <<< Note 29.391 by AGNT99::CHILDS "I'll meet you by the 3rd Pyramid" >>>
         -< "Mike appreciate the support your Hero"-Roger Clemens ;^) >-


> Hey Don how'd my good buddy Clemens do the other night when he pitched I didn't
> catch the results????
    
    He gave up 0 earned runs and lost because his team couldn't make 2
    routine plays. 
    
    Thanks for asking.
    
    Mark.
29.393but Markie 6 walks????AGNT99::CHILDSI'll meet you by the 3rd PyramidFri Jun 21 1991 11:210
29.394CARROL::LEFEBVREAspiring Fender BenderFri Jun 21 1991 11:275
    The 6 walks mean nothing if he had a defense.  Not a vintage Clemens
    performance, but he did pitch out a couple of jams.  He definitely
    pitched well enough to win.
    
    Mark.
29.395CAM::WAYRuck till you puke...Fri Jun 21 1991 11:3016
Mike, Mike, Mike --

Everybody has a slightly off day from time to time...

I mean, you do, I do, Dr Midnight does, Lufay does, Schneider does, MrT does,
Bob Hunt does, Dickstah does, JD does, ACC Chris does, Dean Smith does
a lot in the NCAA Tourney, Dinz does, Slasher does.....

So, Roger had an off day...

I mean, when you come right down to it, we're all a little off.....

(Except for Hawk -- he's just a plain freakin' lunatic!)


'Saw
29.396AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Jun 21 1991 11:586
29.397AGNT99::CHILDSI'll meet you by the 3rd PyramidFri Jun 21 1991 12:4011
 but Markie if he doesn't put those guys on base they don't score right?

 Saw I realize this, also realize this is friday chopsbusting day supreme
 and when he was godly like at the beginging of the year how many barbs got
 hurled at moi? I took them in stride bid my time now it's my turn aren't
 you boys man enough to take it?

 ;^)

  
29.398He puts 'em on, they stays there!SOFBAS::TRINWARDCareful Don't Step in DECrapFri Jun 21 1991 12:4511
    >> if he doesn't put those guys on base they don't score right?
    
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I recall the inning they scored all the
    runs, the runners got on on errors, then got driven home by Griffette (tm)
    {I'm sick of this "Griffey-Junior" cr*p} with his GR double...
    
    Don't recall that Rocket walks occurred in that inning; he managed to
    keep those runners from scoring...
    
    _ SteveT
    
29.399CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 21 1991 12:463
    Actually, Mike, I don't think the walks hurt him.  He pitched himself
    out of a couple of bases loaded jams.  The damage came in the 5th when
    the Sox committed 2 errors which accounted for 3 unearned runs.
29.400hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaAGNT99::CHILDSI'll meet you by the 3rd PyramidFri Jun 21 1991 13:103
 whatever......

 here you go grease your woodies   ROGER IS GAWD!!!!!
29.401Talk about greasing it up...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 21 1991 13:507
    Hey, Mike, if the best you can do is sling barbs at a guy who is
    obviously in a slump but whose ERA still hovers around 2.00 for all his
    bad work, then bring it on!
    
    glenn
    
29.402August swoon???AGNT99::CHILDSI'll meet you by the 3rd PyramidFri Jun 21 1991 14:256
 yeah Glenn it has been a tough hoe this year. He's been good to kids, the press
 and murder on the opposition. Not much ammo for me to use. Hopefully in time
 that will change. 

 mike
29.403CARROL::LEFEBVREAspiring Fender BenderFri Jun 21 1991 14:425
    Actually, Mike, I was expecting to hear from you after Roger was forced
    to turn in his gun permit.  After all, what the Hell does anyone need
    to own a gun for?
    
    Mark.
29.404Superman, he ain'tSOFBAS::TRINWARDCareful Don't Step in DECrapFri Jun 21 1991 14:458
    >>  He's been good to kids, the press and murder on the opposition. 
    >>  Not much ammo for me to use.
    
    Not much for Roger, either, now the Framingham cops took his
    gun-permit.  (Still got his guns, though -- under his wife's name.)
    
    - SteveT, glad_to_see_Rocket_succeeding_as_a_member_of_the_human_race
    
29.405AGNT99::CHILDSI'll meet you by the 3rd PyramidFri Jun 21 1991 16:147
 For some silly reason that's beyond me Mark some people actually find enjoyment
 from them Mark. I don't begrudge them that as long as they do it safely and
 store them properly. I went shooting a couple of times when I was younger
 never really enjoyed.

 Also I never heard the story until now....
29.406CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 21 1991 17:021
    No self respectin' Texan would be caught dead without a coupla guns.
29.407Soxs up 4-1, Mike doesn't worry remembers 9 run lead blown beforeCHIEFF::CHILDSwe're chained...Wed Jun 26 1991 13:2510
    
"My worst asset may be being around the plate too much...The harder I throw
 the harder it comes back at me"...

 my idol his highness the grand poopaa's comments after last night's loss...

 maybe he isn't even going to wait till august to swoon...

mike     

29.408SI is to blam!CRBOSS::DERRYInside is out, Outside is in...Wed Jun 26 1991 14:332
    Yo, Mike.  Hope you don't end up with Shaun Cassidy and/or Saturday
    Night Fever, on that tape...
29.409CARROL::LEFEBVREAspiring Fender BenderThu Jun 27 1991 10:553
    "Yanks Spank, Sox Stank", film @ 11.
    
    Mark.
29.410Inquiring O's fans gotta knowSTAR::YANKOWSKASIt just takes a smidgeon...Fri Jun 28 1991 16:025
    What's the story with Clemens?  I heard on NESN this morning that he
    may not make his scheduled start on Sunday because of a stomach ailment?
    
    
    py
29.411REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Starland Vocal Band?Fri Jun 28 1991 16:262
29.412'Tis true!TNPUBS::NAZZARORick Fox: 1991's Michael Smith???Fri Jun 28 1991 17:017
    Actually, Clemens ate a triple helping of refried beans on "A Taste
    of Mexico" day i n the clubhouse Wednesday, and the beans have yet 
    to leave his system.
    
    HTH,
    
    NAZZ
29.413GONGGONGGONGGONGGO - fallin' fast for 3rd...CRBOSS::DERRYInside is out, Outside is in...Mon Jul 01 1991 12:191
    
29.414AXIS::ROBICHAUDTue Jul 02 1991 15:5414
	The Hit Dog was barking last night, and the rest of the Red Sox 
regulars are grumbling about playing time.  While Brunansky and Clark 
struggle to stay above the Mendoza line, it seems like Bonehaid will make 
the .305 hitting Quintana ride the pine.  The two best candidates for the 
odd man out in the rotating lineup are Bruno and the Whiffer, at least 
until one of them can prove he can hit consistently.  The Globe reported 
that Bonehaid wanted to make sure everyone knew that Carlos was responsible 
for losing the game Sunday in Baltimore despite never telling Carlos of his 
intentions of playing him in right field until game time (Quintana didn't 
even have his outfield glove with him).  The sad truth is that the only 
change that Bonehaid is capable of handling is that of the quarter, nickle 
and dime variety.  8^(

				/Don
29.415Lots o runsMR4DEC::WENTZELLSET HELP/EARTHDAY=EVERYDAYWed Jul 03 1991 11:572
29.416Gossage,Fingers,Lyons :-)STAR::YANKOWSKASParty on Garth! Party on Wayne!Mon Jul 22 1991 10:551
    
29.417Hey, when's the B's season start. (-:CRBOSS::DERRYJumpin' ship...Mon Jul 22 1991 11:071
    GONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONG...  You gotta laugh.
29.418Time to jump on the Twinkies B-wagon?NEMAIL::LEARYMMon Jul 22 1991 11:376
    yer right.
    For whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee, Lou and Joe.
    Boggs thinks that this is just another way the Lord is testing them.
    Don't ya luv them reborn sexahexaholics.
    
    
29.419A mighty stench eminating from the Fenz.30301::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Mon Jul 22 1991 11:3913
    
    Do we start building the coffin yet?
    
    Is this the end of Tollway Joe?
    
    While thier at it why don't they can Gorman too.
    
    Wait...if they did can Gorman, they'd lose alot of hotdog & pizza 
    revenue. He probably doesn't pay for it anyway. 
    
    
    
    Steve
29.420Which is worse?HPSRAD::RIEUI want my CIPBM!Mon Jul 22 1991 11:472
       If they can Lou, does that put a Sully back in charge?
                                                 Denny
29.421I know it's bad...WV3::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Mon Jul 22 1991 13:177
    
    Maybe we hope that Mrs. Yawkey finally croaks??
    
    
    
    
    Steve
29.422MAXWEL::CHILDSsign said, Stay Away Fool..Wed Jul 24 1991 19:222
 Is Clemens injuried? 
29.423CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 24 1991 19:504
29.424MCIS1::DHAMELBadda-bing, badda-boomWed Jul 24 1991 19:536
    
    Oil Can Boyd goes for Texas tonight as the Sox seek to extend their
    losing streak.  This could be humiliating.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.425Hesketh, the best they got??????WV3::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Thu Jul 25 1991 11:028
    
    Oh boy. Sox win 2-1 over Trash Can and the Rangers. I think the
    Rangers must have felt bad for Boston and let em have the last 
    game.
    
    
    
    Steve
29.426Sox wuz luckyEARRTH::BROOKSIncrease The Peace !Thu Jul 25 1991 14:451
    
29.427MCIS1::DHAMELBadda-bing, badda-boomTue Jul 30 1991 16:3549
    
    Are you a Red Sox fan who feels "There's nothing good on TV" (all 80
    channels) when there is no game?
    
    Are you tired of watching them lose day in and day out?
    
    Well, being a supporter of the arts, I want to pass along some
    alternative viewing that can be had FREE on one of many of your local
    public-supported stations.  PBS is good and good for you.
    
    [from the monthly PBS broadcast magazine]
    
    "The Civil War:  Part XII, The Humour"
     
    -This documentary chronicles the jokes made about Abe Lincoln from both
    sides of the Mason-Dixon line.  Highlights include Ulysses S. Grant's
    collection of whoopie cushions, hand buzzers, and fake horse doo; the
    diary of Fred Putznoop, who delivered the stand-up monologue at Ford's
    Theater the night Lincoln was shot; short-sheeting while tenting on the
    old camp ground.
    
    "Cooking with George Washington Carver"
    
    -This month covers such items as peanut pancake surprise, peanut
    5-alarm chile, peanut napoleons, and peanut sausage.  Sponsored by
    Planters(tm).
    
    "Sickening Kingdom"
    
    -This charming nature show features the eating habits of the vulture as
    we see these beautiful creatures dining on an armalillo road kill. 
    Next is a lion family as they stalk the fleet gazelle, rip it to
    shreds, and drag the flyblown remains back to the rest of the nuclear
    family.  Finally, see how mother yellow-bellied crawbills lovingly
    regurgitate half-digested insects into the mouths of their young
    waiting hungrily in their nest.  This show is made possible through a
    grant from Little Debbie Snack Cakes.
    
    "I, Pee Wee"
    
    This is a fictional account of a former shortstop turned children's
    television show host, who manages to tumble from heroism to ignominy,
    in the classic tradition of the great Greek tragedies.  Includes
    interviews with Dr. Ruth Westheimer.  Narrated by Fred Rogers.
    
    Check your local listing for times/dates.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.428CAM::WAYPee Wee = Manson minus swastikaTue Jul 30 1991 16:4420
Actually, I have a woodie over the way the Red Sox are playing.

I mean, if you wanna stink up the joint, why not cheese off a really good
sulfur one.  That's what the Sux are doing.

They bought all that talent, and they put all their eggs in the basket
marked Roger Clemens.  Clark is a stiff, Morgan, well, I still haven't
figured out if this guy has a brain or where he hides it if he does...

Gorman?  Should be running a used car lot for all his savvy.  

The owners?  Hope they die, because that's what it will take to put
a winner in Fenway Park....


Like Pee Wee, who as *almost* there, the Red Sox never quite climax....



'Saw
29.429HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxes!Tue Jul 30 1991 16:466
>    Are you a Red Sox fan who feels "There's nothing good on TV" (all 80
>    channels) when there is no game?
    
       I think you meant to say: "there's nothing good on TV even when
    there IS a game on." Right?
                                     Denny
29.430CAM::WAYPee Wee = Manson minus swastikaTue Jul 30 1991 16:554
Any time the Sux play lately it's NO GAME.....


8^)
29.431suprised Karen hasn't gonged latelyCST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Tue Jul 30 1991 17:0414
    Hey there - Lighten up willya???
    
    The Sox are playing the way they are
    
    
    
    
    	To prepare us for the Patriots!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    ta boom!!!!
    Kev
    
29.432Funniest note of the yearVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERSome folks trust in reasonTue Jul 30 1991 17:253
    I PeeWee?!?  Dickstah, you're a nut!
    
    Dan
29.433sulfur indeedSTAR::YANKOWSKASYou watch too much TV kidTue Jul 30 1991 17:2510
    Just when you thought this team had made every bonehead play in the
    book, they come up with another one -- Kevin Morton The Phenom has
    *balked* in a run in this afternoon's game!
    
    2-1 Texas in the third inning.  For anyone who gives a rat's butt,
    they're giving updates in VAXWRK::RED_SOX (check the last few replies
    to topic 76).
    
    
    py
29.434enjoying every minute of it...MAXWEL::CHILDSHe even danced with Maryln-NO WAY!Wed Jul 31 1991 03:289
 is Roger's era over 5 yet?

 hahahahaaa 6-0 and he won't even win 20.....he who laughs last laughs
 best...

 jack clark on a 684 rbi pace hahahahahhaaa

 mike
29.435STILL THE BESTLUDWIG::GARRYGo IrishWed Jul 31 1991 09:537
    
    Mike,
    
    
    Its not even half of 5 and won't be all year.
    
    Tom
29.436BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Wed Jul 31 1991 10:036
    Is it true that, every time the "Q" comes to the plate two times in the
    same inning against the Can in Fenway, he gets 6 RBI's?
    
    Amazing how he "always" does this.  Never failed.
    
    lEe  :*)
29.437MCIS1::DHAMELDude without a 'tudeWed Jul 31 1991 12:0615
    
    And The Can urinating and lamenting after the game was, well, classic
    Oil Can.
    
    "I din Wan pitch here, Ah tol' 'em I din wan pitch here, Ah don' wan
    pitch here ev'agin.  They's too many bad thins here and too much for me
    to think 'bout and not cons'trate on mah pitchin."
    
    HAHAHAH.  Yeah right, Can.  Get paid a million bucks a year, then tell
    your owner/manager you don't like to pitch in certain places and may
    you please be excused from your turn in the rotation.  Get a job, fer
    cripes sake.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.438STAR::YANKOWSKASYou watch too much TV kidWed Jul 31 1991 12:2418
    re a couple back, Quintana's second hit in the 3rd inning (the 2-run
    double) was off Wayne Rosenthal, who came in to relieve Boyd halfway
    through the onslaught.
    
    As for the Can, since the trade to the Rangers just last week he has:
    
    	Publicly said he'd rather be back in the National League
    
    	Demanded that the Rangers sign him for $2 million next year
    
    	Bitched about having to start in Fenway against his former team
    
    Gotta wonder how much longer it'll be before he wears out his welcome
    in Texas...
    
    
    py
                  
29.439WMOIS::COOK_TSmithwick's @ McSwiggins=HeavenWed Jul 31 1991 12:444
    The Red Sox are to Baseball, what the Whalers are to Hockey!
    
    Conan
    
29.440HAH!CAM::WAYHigh-Toned Son of a BitchWed Jul 31 1991 12:5824
No, they're not.

The Red Sox, since 1918, have come close a lot.  They were in four World
World Series, the last three out of five years(?) they played in the 
ACLS.  Of course, every remembers 1978 8^)

In the late 40's they were consistently in the hunt, often losing the
pennant in the late days of the race.


The Whalers on the other hand, have never, ever, even come anywhere near
close by the time the fat lady sings.  They've never moved out of their
division, even.

The Whalers are the ULTIMATE in mediocrity.  They have never had a superstar,
whereas cases can be made for many players who've worn the Red Sox uniform.


Nope, yer comparision falls down miserably when the light of cold
hard facks(tm) is shone upon it.  Like PeeWee when the lights came up
and the cops came by, your analogy was just a tired, spent, little deviant  8^)


'Saw
29.441Gordie Howe was a superstar(not for Whalers)CTHQ3::LEARYWed Jul 31 1991 14:3910
    But 'Saw,
    
    Methinks I recall you lusting for das MegaSuperstar RON FRANCIS!!
    
    
    MikeL
    
    PS. BTW, Have you read Koontz' new book "Cold Fire "?  Wifey's reading
    it now and says it's OK. Don't know the plot though.
    
29.442Double Hah!WMOIS::COOK_TSmithwick's @ McSwiggins=HeavenWed Jul 31 1991 14:426
    Me_thinks you defend the Red Sox with the same voracity as ACCrisp does
    UNC.  Lets see; 1 in thirty 31 versus 1 in 73,  I'd call that
    mediocrity!
    
    Conan
    
29.443AXIS::ROBICHAUDTheFew,TheProud,TheBonehaidsWed Jul 31 1991 15:194
    	How many games do the Red Sox have to lose before Gorman gives
    Bonehaid Morgan a job application for the Mass Turnpike Authority?
    
    				/Don
29.444Plow them roads boy!HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxes!Wed Jul 31 1991 15:343
       I don't think he needs an application /Don. They're holding his old
    job for him.
                                Denny
29.445CAM::WAYHigh-Toned Son of a BitchWed Jul 31 1991 15:5124
Nah, the Sox are different from UNC is one very special way.

YOu'll never hear a Baby Blue alum get on Dean-O.  You'll never hear 
them say He choked.

Red Sox fans (and believe me, I've been around a ton of them all my life)
feel the angst in every loss.  Then we unmercifully get on the team,
the coach (has ANYONE forgiven Mac for leaving Billy Buck in there?)
and the GM and owners.

re Ron Francis:

	Ronnie is a darn good hockey players, and a very classy act
	off the ice.  He was treated like SHIT by the Whalers.

	He is not, however, a Gretzky or Lemieux. 

	Hence, the Whalers have never had a Superstar...


My logic still holds, impeccably.


'Saw
29.446This could be funWMOIS::COOK_TSmithwick's @ McSwiggins=HeavenWed Jul 31 1991 16:318
    I'm mot talking about fan (or lemming) support just the record in the
    big dance! 8^)
    
    
    Logic is flawed in that regard
    
    Conan
    
29.447RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Jul 31 1991 16:4023
    What's up with Jeff Gray?
    
    re Red Sox and Whalers
    
    I think if one would look at won loss stats for the 80's, the Red Sox
    would have one of the best in the American League - not THE best, but
    one of the best.
    
    'Saw is correct...the Sox have come a heck of alot closer more often
    than the Whalers ever have - even in their short history.
    
    The Red Sox won the first World Series ever played. Hall of Famers such
    as Babe Ruth, Tris Speaker, Cy Young, Bobby Doerr, Jimmie Foxx
    and Ted Williams played for the Sox. The Red Sox lost the AL pennant on
    the last day of the season in 1948 and in 1949. Only the Athletics and
    Yankees have appeared in more World Series, from the American League,
    than the Red Sox.
    
    Clearly, there is no logical comparison between the Whalers and Red
    Sox.
    
    Rich
     
29.448Got a quarter? No, Well F*ck youCTHQ3::LEARYWed Jul 31 1991 16:4626
    'Saw,
    I know all that stuff about Francis. Implied smileys, only busting
    your cojones. 
    Speakin of the Sox n stuff, ain't them rascally Yankee nitwits in your
    DMZ zone in Ct. actin' up a bit with the Sox being lobotomized for the
    rest of the season!!
    
    Speakin of DMZ zones. Can any of you Yank fans tell me the name of the
    jail just south of Yankee Stadium ? I took the wife to a Sox-Yankee
    game in the fall of '86 and parked near this hellhole of a prison
    There were windows high up near the top of the jail, and the prisoners
    were looking through the bars and screamin' bloody murder at the 
    people walkin' by going to the stadium. It was a riot! The fans (!??!)
    going to the stadium were more abusive to the guys in jail than
    vice/versa. The best part of that weekend was the next day when a 
    few of us ventured to Times Sq. area. On the way back to our hotel, we
    went by Madison Sq and the infamous Hotel Penta. There we saw a sight 
    that only was possible in NYC. About 20' from the entrance of the 
    Penta (in broad daylight ) we passed a a buck naked filthy dude,
    stretched out laying on the sidewalk, head crooked in palm ala Joe
    Namath, wearing sunglasses, smokin' a cigar, drinkin' a Bud, with
    a sign TAPED on his chest " HELP ME ". Priceless.
    
    
    MikeL
    
29.449WMOIS::COOK_TSmithwick's @ McSwiggins=HeavenWed Jul 31 1991 16:474
    Since when has logic appied to ::Sports?  8^)
    
    Conan
    
29.450Scooter = the Johnny Most of BaseballTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Wed Jul 31 1991 16:568
Seen on the tube lasted night...

As the Yanks were losing to the Athletics, fans at Yankee Stadium lit a Red Sox
hat on fire and held it up on a pole.  

The amazing thing was when that a** hole Scooter got a woodie over it.

=Bob=
29.451CAM::WAYHigh-Toned Son of a BitchWed Jul 31 1991 17:5831
re CT DMZ:

	Nope, nobody's really going bonkers over much of anything down
	here except the possibility of a_incomeTax and our lack of a
	budget.

	It's a mess, really, and I figure that no matter what happens
	the Old Chainsaw will be bendin' over as far as he can, grabbing
	his ankules, and hopin' the State at least uses Vaseline....

	Us young single folk who work hard for that paltry salaries we
	get will bear the brunt of paying for the years and years of
	fiscal mismanagement, and the year of old Rummy O'Neill's 
	administration getting fat.

	
	Other than that, not much is happening.

	The hottest SPORTS topics down here of late are the GHO, which
	was a rousing success with all the Pros getting HUGE woodies over
	the redesigned course (even I had a modest woodie), and
	the Nutmeg Games.

	The Nutmeg Games pit athletes from the four regions of the State
	East West North South, against in other, in a plethora of
	Sports.  They'll run from today through the end of the weekend...


Just in case anyone was interested....

'Saw
29.452AXIS::ROBICHAUDTheFew,TheProud,TheBonehaidsWed Jul 31 1991 17:594
    	Rich, Jeff Gray had a case of JoeMorganis (i.e. a brain spasm)
    he should be all right.
    
    				/Don
29.453RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Jul 31 1991 18:048
    Thanks for the update, Slasher.
    
    His condition wouldn't have anything to do with overwork, would it?
    Seems every day when I check the box scores, Gray and Fossas are
    pitching. Doesn't Gray lead the league in appearances or something?
    
    Rich
    
29.454STAR::YANKOWSKASYou watch too much TV kidWed Jul 31 1991 18:209
    re .453:
    
    Through Monday's games, Gray was the AL leader in appearances with 50.
    
    Heard somewhere that Gray had a similar blackout in college, so I don't
    know if recent overwork had anything to do with it.
                                                   
    
    py
29.455CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 31 1991 18:468
    One of the Globe writers quoted a Miami sportswriter who compiled
    winning percentages for teams in the 4 major sports (hoops, baseball,
    hockey, football) over the last 25 years (of course, the Dolphins came
    out on top).  The BoSox were in the top 10 and were in the top 3 among
    baseball teams.  The only "Boston" sports franchise that did not appear
    in the top 25 was the New England Patriots.  The article basically
    asked why Boston area fans (other than Pats' fans) were whining so much
    about the Cs, Bs, and BoSox.
29.456FDCV07::KINGIf the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!!Wed Jul 31 1991 18:524
    Mac, The red SOx were 25th on the list and the fifth baseball team
    listed. The Lakers were second and the Celtics were third...
    
    REK
29.457VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Jul 31 1991 20:249
>>    Penta (in broad daylight ) we passed a a buck naked filthy dude,
>>    stretched out laying on the sidewalk, head crooked in palm ala Joe
>>    Namath, wearing sunglasses, smokin' a cigar, drinkin' a Bud, with
>>    a sign TAPED on his chest " HELP ME ". Priceless.

That was me.  That's Digital's new travel plan.  Oh, and you also have to
deduct any money you make on your expense report.

j.
29.458CAM::WAYHigh-Toned Son of a BitchWed Jul 31 1991 20:319
>That was me.  That's Digital's new travel plan.  Oh, and you also have to
>deduct any money you make on your expense report.


Jeff, I'm ROLLWARD!

Please don't say that too loud however.  Jack Smith with hear you,
get a woodie, and next thing you know, we'll be selling BASEstar
from the  gutter in the Back Bay area.....
29.459Boston Fans dooing the B & M ???CSTEAM::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Thu Aug 01 1991 02:118
    Mac,
    
    Was the author, by any chance Dave Barry??
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
29.460The Big House isCSC32::FARRAHERSend lawyers, guns &amp; moneyThu Aug 01 1991 04:477
    re. .448
    
    
    	The jail near Yankee Stadium is the Bronx County Courthouse & Jail.
    Comes in hand when the Yankee's run a Handgun Night promotion(2.50 off
    of reserved grandstand seats when you show your handgun at the
    turnstile)
29.461CAM::WAYHigh-Toned Son of a BitchThu Aug 01 1991 11:0310
>    	The jail near Yankee Stadium is the Bronx County Courthouse & Jail.
>    Comes in hand when the Yankee's run a Handgun Night promotion(2.50 off
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    of reserved grandstand seats when you show your handgun at the
>    turnstile)



If it was in Sarasota, they'd all get arrested.....

29.462CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 01 1991 13:143
    Thanks, REK.  I read the article while on vacation with a cooler of
    malt beverages close by.  I think I read something sometime about brain
    cells and alcohol, but I can't remember now.
29.463MCIS1::DHAMELDude without a 'tudeFri Aug 02 1991 12:3319
    
    Just saw this article a few days late in the Boston Hearall(tm):
    
    A fan had made arrangements with the Red Sox public relations
    dapartment to present to Mike Greenwell a painting he had done of Mike
    in action.  Said it took him almost 200 hours to complete, so he was
    allowed to visit the dugout before the game and give Mike the painting
    for his 28th birthday.  Greenwell, thinking the guy just wanted it
    autographed, seemed genuinely pleased when the guy told him it was his
    to keep.  Greenwell, in turn, thanked the guy and gave him an
    autographed bat.
    
    Sometime later in the game, Mike had a bad trip to the plate (struck
    out, popped up or something), and his temper got the best of him.  So
    what does Mike do?  You guessed it.  He put his bat through the
    painting.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.464Little Help PleaseOPUS3::JACOBPete Rose's bat or Rock Hudson's chin???Tue Aug 06 1991 23:345
    Can anybody tell me what Cy Youn...ER...Roger Clemens record and era
    are for this season so far?????
    
    JaKe
    
29.465Was just looking at the sports sectionTOOK::BKWALWed Aug 07 1991 09:398
    
    From today's Boston Globe:
    
    Clemens has 12 wins, 7 losses, 2.49 ERA, 170 IP, 40 BB, 151 SO
    
    Bill K.
    
    (Damn I just blew my Read Only NOTY ;-)
29.466Oh those jokers at 'bcn...CRBOSS::DERRYRIP SoxFri Aug 09 1991 11:365
    The 'BCN Red Sox funeral procession began about a half hour ago... I
    thought I heard that Peter Gammons was to deliver the eulogy???  
    sniff sniff.., hand me a hanky.
    
    Just think, they could leave Toronto 15.5 or so games back.  
29.467What do you say about a bunch of losers?? CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Fri Aug 09 1991 16:219
I heard teh ulogy on my way to Six Smegma training in MR0. It sucked, just
like the team it was said for. Personally I think this team should be 
cremated(sp?), and thier ashes should be put on a rocket with a direct heading
for the sun.



Steve
29.468Just when you think you've got it figured out...CRBOSS::DERRYStop that bandwagon!Mon Aug 12 1991 09:291
    
29.469CSLALL::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Mon Aug 12 1991 10:353
    Ha ha ha  :*)
    
    lEe
29.470SHIRE::ELLISTwo fat parsons - click, click, click!!Mon Aug 12 1991 10:397
Still a third of the season to go, eh!

What happened yesterday with the Sox, Tigers, and Jays?

tks. a lot

rick
29.471CRBOSS::DERRYStop that bandwagon!Mon Aug 12 1991 11:203
    Sox beat the Jays, for the third straight day...
    
    Tigers lost 2 to the Yanks.
29.472tks. karen & thank god Detroit lost!SHIRE::ELLISTwo fat parsons - click, click, click!!Mon Aug 12 1991 11:300
29.473parade in October :-)STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Aug 16 1991 16:525
    Red Sox conference reports that the Sox have just picked up Dan Petry
    off the waiver wires.
    
    
    py
29.474Who is Dan Petry?AGNT99::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Aug 16 1991 16:570
29.475FDCV07::KINGIs there life before Friday?Fri Aug 16 1991 17:014
    Another GODDAM&**^%^%&$^%&*$#%^*(()_*^$^%$&%&**(*(_)^%
    Pitcher  with 20 plus years in the majors!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
    
    REK
29.476Don't you just love it when they move that REK likes?CNTROL::CHILDSthataboy George, screw those unemployedFri Aug 16 1991 17:078
>    Another GODDAM&**^%^%&$^%&*$#%^*(()_*^$^%$&%&**(*(_)^%
>    Pitcher  with 20 plus years in the majors!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
    
    REK, could you repeat that please i don't quite thing I got it all...

 ;^)

29.477I'm not afraid of sharptooth either!CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Fri Aug 16 1991 18:327
    Sheesh, all this time I thought Petry was the baby
    teradactyl who couldn't fly in "The Land Before Time"
    
    :^)
    
    Kev
    
29.478HAVASU::HEISERin the land of the morning starFri Aug 16 1991 18:501
    just don't smoke those star leaves!
29.479KBD's wagon foot on the pedal, hand on the emercencyCNTROL::CHILDSTake me to Roslyn's Cafe PleaseSun Aug 18 1991 23:526
  
>>>  just don't smoke those star leaves!

	Yeah save em for the Soxs they need em...

29.480Tigers coulda helped...CRBOSS::DERRYStormy MondayMon Aug 19 1991 12:206
>           -< KBD's wagon foot on the pedal, hand on the emercency >-

    (-:
    
    Let's hope that the Jays lose a few more before they get back on
    track.
29.481SHIRE::ELLISPeter Arnett heads to Moscow?Mon Aug 19 1991 12:4812
    
>>    Let's hope that the Jays lose a few more before they get back on
>>    track.

Oh Oh,

Karen, could you let us know what happened to Toronto, Detroit, and Boston
over the weekend?

Thanks a million

rick
29.482Tks. just got the results in BASEBALL!! awright!!SHIRE::ELLISPeter Arnett heads to Moscow?Mon Aug 19 1991 12:540
29.483RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Aug 22 1991 14:4616
    The recent success of the Sox indicates a terrible AL East rather than
    a good Boston club. When one considers that Joe Hesketh is the ace of
    the Boston staff, something is wrong.
    
    In addition, I've got to wonder how Detroit is doing so well. Neither
    the Sox or Tigers are particularly good - yet they are on the heels of
    the reeling Jays.
    
    The Indians and Orioles sip. The Yankees are rebuilding and the Brewers
    are capable of the same things the Red Sox and Tigers are. With the
    Jays finishing up their season out West, I look for Milwaukee and
    Detroit to fight it out for the AL East crown. The Red Sox will make it
    interesting but they have the weakest pitching staff in the division. 
    
    Rich
    
29.484CARROL::LEFEBVREKnows his way around a G stringThu Aug 22 1991 15:226
    The Sox still have time to take over first place...
    
    
    ...and end up 8 games out.
    
    Mark.
29.485yes I told you so... ;^) CNTROL::CHILDSI want a job like Randy West'sThu Aug 22 1991 15:479
  The pressure of a pennant race is again upon the Red Soxs and one Roger
  Clemens can't win a ball game....

  Strange coincidence???

  I think not....

  mike
29.486CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 22 1991 15:567
    Mike, you forgot to mention Clemen's previous performance on 3 days
    rest.
    
    I must admit I am bothered about Clemens recent propensity toward
    digging himself and his teammates a hole.  Once he gets through the
    first 2 innings he looks like vintage Roger Clemens.  During the first
    2 innings he can look like Wes Gardner.
29.487(-:CRBOSS::DERRYThe music never stopped...Fri Aug 23 1991 09:596
>    first 2 innings he looks like vintage Roger Clemens.  During the first
>    2 innings he can look like Wes Gardner.
    
    Not true.  Wes was/is a smidge better looking than Roger.
    
    HTH.
29.488CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Aug 23 1991 12:077
29.489Back to lifeHPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Aug 23 1991 12:353
       Good point about the funeral Mac. Ever see 'Night of the living
    dead'? Those zombies walked the way the Sox run the bases.
                                    Denny
29.490MCIS1::DHAMELI'm not distorted. Reality is.Fri Aug 23 1991 13:005
    
    -1
    
    HAHAHAHAAHAHAHA(tm)
    
29.491HAVASU::HEISERstep into my grooveFri Aug 23 1991 16:171
    don't worry though, they're just teasin' us again
29.492...Upon further review...AXIS::ROBICHAUDThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBallsWed Aug 28 1991 16:079
    	A local station here, channel 56 obtained a home video tape from
    a Phoenix resident who happened to be recording when the
    Greenteeth/Vaugn battle erupted and it looks like old Greenteeth
    was the instigator.  Now why the club is taking Greenteeth's side
    is open to discussion, but as they say one picture is worth a thousand
    words.  The truth is the fight was better than the "Match Made In
    Hell" they had on SummerSlam.
    
    				/Don
29.494lets have itHPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Aug 28 1991 16:243
       Yeah, this is as good a note as any for a rasslin' update. I'm sure
    REK is waiting on the edge of his seat!
                                  Denny
29.495FDCV07::KINGIs there life before Friday?Wed Aug 28 1991 16:274
    Check out the Red SOx notesfile.... Greenwell should have had that
    bat he was swinging shoved up his ass!
    
    REK
29.497Greenteeth talks the talk, but he cain't walk the walkAXIS::ROBICHAUDThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBallsWed Aug 28 1991 18:261
    
29.498AXIS::CHAPPELHillbilly Patriot FanThu Aug 29 1991 13:187
I finally had a chance to see the video of the Vaughn - Greenwell match.

Mike Greenwell should be very thankful that Jack Clark was there to save his 
bacon, because if he wasn't, Mo woulda put a serious hurt on him.

Chap
29.499HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Aug 29 1991 13:503
       Actually, Dreamwell coulda been charged with assault for going after
    him wif that bat.
                                       Denny
29.500Gator popsicleAXIS::CHAPPELHillbilly Patriot FanThu Aug 29 1991 15:109
29.501RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Sep 09 1991 17:3415
    Surprised that there is no action in this note today. The Sox swept
    Seattle to remain 5 1/2 games out. They are now alone in 2nd place as
    the Tigers begin to fade and Toronto heads West.
    
    Seems Toronto will have the toughest schedule for the rest of the year.
    They get to play the AL west where it will be much tougher on them. The
    Sox and Tigers, though, get Baltimore, Cleveland and New York to play
    with.
    
    Sad really. The Tigers and Red Sox are really not very good yet they
    may very well be the teams that battle in the final days for the AL
    East title.
    
    Rich
    
29.502Put out the lights, the party's overTNPUBS::NAZZAROLife w/out meaning cannot be borneMon Sep 09 1991 17:4314
    I disagree that the AL West is tougher at this time of year.
    
    Teams like Kansas City, Texas, Seattle, and California will most likely
    be looking at their rookies the last month of the season, since they're
    just playing out the string.  Only Chicago, Oakland, and Minnesota
    might play the BLue Jays tough.
    
    Also, the Sox must play five games with Detroit, who is battling them
    for second place.  ;-)
    
    In order for the Sox to win the pennant, if Toronto only goes 12-11,
    the Sox would have to win 20 of 26 games.  A very long shot.
    
    NAZZ
29.503RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Sep 09 1991 19:1819
    Don't care, Nazz. Kansas City is ALWAYs tough as is Texas, at home.
    Perhaps California is throwing in the towell but Seattle is still young
    and hungry and will play their hearts out. And, with their pitching
    staff, they are still capable of going on a 8-10 game streak.
    
    Toronto has shown in the past a propensity to play tight and blow it.
    They don't know how to kick a guy when he's down. After a long year,
    they will finish out on long plane rides to the West coast and the
    soutwest. It will take it's toll.
    
    Yet, I still believe Toronto is the best in the East and deserves the
    title. I just can't look at the Tiger and Red Sox lineups and swallow
    the fact that they are still in it this late. Give the Tigers a couple
    more pitchers and, yeah, I'd like their chances but Frank Tanana? Gimme
    a break. The Red Sox sputter along with medicre pitching after Clemens
    and Reardon. Joe Hesketh? Nah..
    
    Rich
    
29.504CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 09 1991 19:237
    The Sox are 9-4 against Toronto in head to head competition.  Who is
    the better team?
    
    The Seattle players are trying to be the first Mariner team to post a
    winning record in the franchise history.  Don't look for them to roll
    over.  They have also been a streaky team this season.  They just
    finished a cold streak...
29.505don't tease yourselfHAVASU::HEISERstep into my grooveMon Sep 09 1991 20:031
    it's not worth the stress
29.506FDCV06::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Tue Sep 10 1991 11:045
    The Yankees are 6 and 1 against the Red Sox...
    
    Who is the better team?
    
    REK
29.507RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Sep 10 1991 11:315
    How 'bout that crowd in Cleveland lasted night? Over 1,600! Wow!!!!
    Thos Celeveland fans really know how to support a team, huh?
    
    Rich
    
29.508CARROL::LEFEBVREFor best results, squeeze bottomTue Sep 10 1991 11:476
    Rich, the Jays are over .500 vs. their remaining opponents, while the
    Sox are something like 12-17 vs. their remaining opponents.
    
    Sox are toast.
    
    Mark.
29.509SHIRE::ELLISMedia PA here I come!Tue Sep 10 1991 12:1317
Mark, you have it in -1

The Jays are .600 against the teams that they will play their remaining games:

            W L
Minnesota   4-2
Oakland     3-3
Seattle     6-1
California  2-4

Totals     15-10

The RedSlobs are done like dinner!

Rendevouz in the Dome in October!

rick
29.510MCIS1::DHAMELI'm not distorted. Reality is.Tue Sep 10 1991 12:3222
    
    >    How 'bout that crowd in Cleveland lasted night? Over 1,600! Wow!!!!
    
    And the real funny part is that they had a special promotion where all
    seats were $3.00.
    
    Can you imagine going to a baseball game and having the guy at the
    ticket window ask "Where would you like to sit?"
       "Oh, how 'bout the first row between home plate and the dugout?"
       "Visitors or home dugout, sir?  O.K., here's your four tickets, that
    will be $12.00, sir."
       "Thank you.  Oh, while I'm here would you mind validating my parking
    ticket?"
       "Certainly, sir."  "Now," he says as he closes the ticket window and
    places the 'back in 5 minutes' sign in front of it, "I'll show you to
    your seats.  Would you care for a hot dog or beer or anything?  I'll
    go get them for you if you like.  A blanket perhaps?  It gets very
    drafty in this place.  If you need anything, I'll be back in my ticket
    booth."
    
    Dickstah
    
29.511RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Sep 10 1991 14:2920
    Yeah, Dickstah, I can picture that scene. 
    
    But can you imagine what it feels like to PLAY in a stadium that size
    in front of such a small crowd? Geez, it must be humiliating.
    
    This is my opinion but I feel that a major league team should draw at
    least 15,000 for home games no matter where they are in the standings.
    The Indians played a competitive game lasted night yet hardly nobody
    noticed. If there is a franchise primed for a move, it is Cleveland.
    And I would have no sympatyhy with anyone who cried about them leaving.
    
    We never had less than 5,000 people for a Richmond Brave game this year
    and we had the worsted team in the IL. We'd kill for a major league
    team as would scores of other cities.
    
    I'm all for tradition and everything but keeping baseball in Cleveland
    is apparantly only important to the commish's office.
    
    Rich
    
29.512Only in SPORTS are people expected to buy inferior productRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Sep 10 1991 14:3814
    Blaming the fans for management failures is bogus at best.  Cleveland
    has been dismal for years and years.  Is this the fans fault?
    Ticket prices have been escalating for years, ballplayers have become
    more arrogant, distant, and disloyal, yet the fans are still supposed
    to trot-on-out to the ballpark to root on the home team.
    
    Bah.  It's *good* that Cleveland isn't drawing this year.  If this
    happened more places maybe we'd actually see a tappering off of
    salaries.  As it stands today, I can *barely* afford to take my family
    of 4 to a Braves game a couple_times a year, and we've got some of the 
    most reasonable ticket prices in either league.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
29.513as Emily said "never mind"...CNTROL::CHILDSInbread quilty catching up with Dan-l??&quot;Tue Sep 10 1991 14:479
 well if you'd stop wasting your money on the poop sheet, carolina blew,
 tarheels forever. etc. you'd be able to afford take your family more
 often...

 oh I forgot when you can't win championships you have to get your jollies
 over the recruiting war stories...

 ;^)
29.514Try Fenway or Shea SometimeRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Sep 10 1991 16:4635
    Chris -
    
    I CAN'T BELIEVE YOUR WHINING ABOUT BRAVES TICKETS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Since most contributors to this file are from New England and Colorado,
    you can appreciate this.
    
    2 weeks ago I took my wife and 2 kids to Atlanta-Fulton County. Paved
    parking lots adjacent to the ball park (which is a couple 100 feet from
    the Interstate with it's own ramp) with a cost of $3.00. 
    
    On Tuesday nights there is a promo by Kroger supermarkets that gets you
    one free upper deck ticket for each one you buy. Upper deck tickets are
    $6.00. Bought 2, got 2 free. Total cost (excluding snacks) was a
    whopping $15.00!!!!! And, if we wanted to sit in CF, the cost is $4.00
    per adult and $1.00 for a child!!!!!
    
    Wow, Chris, now THAT's some serious cash there!!!!
    
    
    Back to Cleveland......Teams left Boston, St. Louis and Philadelphia
    and they averaged more people than showed up at Cleveland last night.
    
    Point is, I grew up in a major league market and I miss the excitement
    of having major league teams in my city. You tend to take it for
    granted when it's in your back yard. Well, there are many other cities
    that can support a team and, if Cleveland's support was eveidenced
    lasted night, then I hope the owners take 'em outta there.
    
    You are correct, Chris, about over-inflated egos, salaries, etc. But
    don't blame the fans for that. Gate receipts don't come close to paying
    the mega salaries.
    
    Rich
    
29.515VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Tue Sep 10 1991 17:146
Let's not draw too many conclusions about Cleveland from lasted night's game. 
It was a makeup scheduled 2 weeks ago.  This is a park that has a hard time
drawing 15,000 anyway.  A short-notice, Monday game long after the home team is
out of it is bound to have a poor turnout.

j.
29.516FSDEV2::MGILBERTKids are our Future-Teach 'em WellTue Sep 10 1991 17:227
    
    RE: Rendevous at the Dome in October
    
    
    Which Dome? Skydome or MetroDome? 
    
    
29.517FDCV07::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Tue Sep 10 1991 17:294
    Has there been a play-off series that both teams play indoors?
    
    
              REK
29.518CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 10 1991 17:321
    Wasn't there the threat of rain in Cleveland last night also?
29.519FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Sep 10 1991 18:1314
    There was a threat of rain last night in Cleveland, no baseball playoff
    series has been completely indoors, a late scheduled makeup game will
    have trouble drawing (a mid-week, afternoon makeup game between the Sox
    and Tribe 2 weeks ago drew 14K in Fenway Park) and I believe that once
    Cleveland gets its new stadium, support for the Indians will go up. 
    Between a newer ballpark that's smaller (the sheer size works against
    drawing a good crowd) and situated away from the ocean *, it will have
    to be a more pleasant atmosphere for baseball than exists now.
    
    John
    
    * - refers to the famous Oil Can Boyd quote from 1986, when he said in
    reference to a fogged-out game in Cleveland, "That's what you get when
    you build a ballpark by the ocean."
29.520RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMary Ann ROOLZ!Tue Sep 10 1991 19:2023
    Rich -
    
    About Cleveland.  With the talk of Seattle moving, despite drawing
    ~2,000,000 a year - it seems wierd that Cleveland isn't in trouble.
    
    Do you know why?  Corporate support, that's why.  Cleveland is going to
    get a new stadium (or its in the works) - they aleady have sold out all
    luxury boxes, etc, to local corporations.  Sure, no one from the
    corporations may go to a meaningless game in September - but that's the
    bottom line.
    
    Truth is stranger than fiction sometimes.
    
    JD
    
    PS - on another, general topic - I'm sick of Florida and some other
    places constantly whining about wanting a pro team - so they build a
    stadium and try to steal established teams - ah yes, America at its
    best.  Covet the neighbors goods.  Grease the palms.  As far as I'm
    concerned, I hope all those cities NEVER get a pro team - let 'em cry
    in their milk of magnesia...
    
    
29.521CAM::WAYIrene Ryan is SUCH a babe!Tue Sep 10 1991 19:221
JD -- Voice your displeasure.  Send them a picture of Burgess Merideth!!!!!!
29.522RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Sep 10 1991 19:4839
    JD,
    
    re your displeasure with Florida...
    
    From the way you describe it, you would also have had a problem with
    Milwaukee in 1952. They had a stadium and "whined for a team". The
    Braves drew less than 200,000 in Boston that year and went to Milwaukee
    which supported the heck out of them till they left.
    
    I have no problem with the Braves leaving Boston. I DO have a problem
    with the Braves leaving Milwaukee or the Colts leaving Baltimore or the
    Raiders leaving Oakland or the Dodgers leaving Brooklyn. In all the
    latter instances, those teams had broad support. Yet greed by the
    owners caused them to jump ship and slap the very people who had helped
    make those franchises great.
    
    re Cleveland
    
    For a blue collar town, just how much money can be generated for luxury
    boxes? Cleveland, like most midwest/northeast cities, is in serious
    financial problems and industry is hurting, too. I also don't buy the
    makeup game excuse. Cleveland has radio stations and TV stations and a
    newspaper. If the city had real baseball fans, they would have made it
    a point to KNOW there was a game lasted night and support their team.
    
    I am sick and tired of places that have franchises that do not support
    them. Soryy John H. but the Patriots are in this category. New England,
    based on it's past support, condition of stadium access, etc, doesn't
    deserve a pro franchise. They have had years to clean up their act and
    still haven't. I can support a loser that tries. A trip to a game in
    Tampa or Green Bay or Atlanta is an enjoyable experience. Not so in
    Foxboro. Lousy parking, the drunkest fans in the NFL.....take the green
    glasses off and the place is a sty.
    
    Well, how 'bout dem Sox? Playing the Tigers tonight. Rocket vs the
    Banana Man.
    
    Rich
    
29.523RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMary Ann ROOLZ!Tue Sep 10 1991 20:0120
    Rich -
    
    I guess being in Seattl now, I'm sick of hearing about St. Pete's and
    other money grubbing Florida teams whining and crying about not having
    a team.  Tough.  They have spring training (and are stealing away the
    Cactus League) - hey the folks in Billings, MT would probably love a
    team - but not everyone can have one.
    
    And Seattle falls into the category of a team getting fan support.
    
    About Cleveland - I report what I read.  It was in the paper out here
    in one of the zillion "Will the M's leave town for Florida" stories.
    Remember, though depressed area, the Browns sell out every game, and
    that's a lot of folks.  The article mentioned that Cleveland not only
    receives lots of corporate sponsership, but just as important, the
    Indians receive Civil support from the local governments.   If the
    Indians didn't, don't you think the wolves from Florida would have
    already been gnawing at the Indians extremities??
    
    JD
29.524JD - "haven't been getting any lately"? :*)CSTEAM::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Wed Sep 11 1991 01:161
    
29.525FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 11 1991 12:1533
    Rich Brake - 
    
    While this more appropriately belongs in the Patriots topic, I will
    reply here.
    
    I've never said that the Patriots must stay here regardless of the
    level of support.  I feel the team must be a winner to be supported,
    unlike the Bruins and to a certain extent, the Celtics and Red Sox.  I
    think it's wrong for the team to be moved if it's not winning because a
    losing team will not be supported here.  If the team is winning and
    isn't being supported, then ownership is 100% justified in moving the
    team.  It would be wrong for Kiam and company to have not put an effort
    in at all to turn the team around.  He could very easily have said
    "f**k it, I want this team somewhere else, I'll let it stink until the
    lease is up and then I'm out of there."  To his credit, he's not doing
    that.  Things are getting better and I think anyone who has been to a
    game this year will say that - both on the field and in the stands. 
    Sam Jankovich spends most of his time during games walking through the
    stands and around the stadium instead of sitting in the press box
    because he wants to find out what's right but more importantly what's
    wrong and how to fix it.  I give him genuine credit for that.  If the
    team was going to move when the lease is up, he wouldn't be doing that.
    
    Bottom line for me is this:  If the team cannot be turned around and
    moves I will be very, very upset because I'll then believe that not all
    possible will have been done to keep it here.  If the team is a winner
    and isn't being supported, I will be very disappointed but I will agree
    with the decision.  The team isn't being run for my benefit, it's a
    business.
    
    John
    
    
29.526RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Sep 11 1991 12:4125
    Perhaps we should rename this: The Boston Red Sox Junk Note ^8)
    
    JD - Speaking of Seattle - I read this morning that the Seattle City
    something or other voted 7-3 in favor of buying 200,000 seats for
    remaining Mariners' home games. Something about an attendance clause in
    the lease. Now THAT is a city that wants a team, although I'm not so
    wild about tax $$ going for that purpose.
    
    re John - Whoa, Ninja, Whoa......I agree with everything you said in
    .525. My position is that, over the 30 years the Patriots have been in
    Boston (New England), it is my opinion that they have treated their
    fans like dogs. The facility, parking, etc. I, like you, appreciate NFL
    football and will support it as long as the experience is an enjoyable
    event - win or lose.
    
    re RED SOX - How 'bout dat Roger Clemens. Two hits the Tiggers and ole
    Ellis cums out of a hole and clears the bases with a 3 run double. Heck
    of a pitching exhibition last night by the Rocket. 
    
    Now da Sox is justed 4 games behind the Jays (3 out in the loss
    column). Da Sox is also 13 1/2 games ahead of da Yanks. Da Sox will be
    in the Bronx this weekend for a big series. 
    
    Rich
    
29.527FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 11 1991 13:037
    Rich, I'm in a lousy mood this morning and what you said got to me.  It
    made me feel like I felt the New England area had a civic duty to
    support the New England Patriots.  It doesn't - it has to be earned.
    
    Truce?  And now back to the Sox?
    
    John
29.528The worse sales pitch ever...ICS::FINUCANETraveler of both time &amp; spaceWed Sep 11 1991 14:5917
    Just a quick note to add to this Pats thang...
    
    It's funny you said that, John (.527).  I work in Corporate Employee
    Services and the Pats organization called me and wanted me
    to carry tickets within DEC.  To make a long story short, the deal they
    were offering stunk and I told them, 'Sorry, no can do.'  I was then
    told by this person that Digital and other business in the area had an
    obligation to (financially) support pro sports teams because that would
    make your company more attractive to potential employees from
    out-of-state.  I didn't buy it.
    
    Let's just say that my response to him was polite but to the point. 
    8-)
    
    Cath 
    
    
29.529FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 11 1991 15:582
    I don't know who talked to you but guess who told the team how to reach
    Employee Services ....
29.530CAM::WAYIrene Ryan is SUCH a babe!Wed Sep 11 1991 16:201
Hal Litelocks???
29.531HAVASU::HEISERthe rock stomps here!Wed Sep 11 1991 16:211
    Dr. Midnight???
29.532FDCV07::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Wed Sep 11 1991 16:263
    DENNY and ?DON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    REK
29.533Where's Da Beef?RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Sep 11 1991 16:3023
    So anyways guys and gals, why for no Sox chatter here? Why didn't
    sumone tell me to shaddup 'bout the Patriots?
    
    This iz September and da Boys uv Summer in Fenway are making it
    interesting............again!!!!!
    
    JD - Where you Bee? Cum on there, fella,. and get on this here wagon.
    Markie, Saw-Man, Hawkster, /Donbo.../..come on boys, where's da spirit,
    huh?
    
    Will the Rog-man win 20? Is he in line for the Sie Yung? Will Margo Man
    win the batting title? How do da Boston fans feel about benching Bruno
    for the man from Plantier's Peanuts? Should Clark bar hang 'em up and
    should Joe Bore-gan play Mo evry day?
    
    Where's da chatter? 4 games out, gang.....
    
    
    Now dat I have single-handedly authored the kiss of death to them, on
    with the festivities.
    
    Rich
    
29.534RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBrowardCountyPimpService,erPoliceWed Sep 11 1991 17:088
    Rich -
    
    Perhaps you don't remember - but I was very optomistic this spring - to
    the point that folks wanted me to start peeing in the little cup.  I've
    felt this was the Sox to lose.  So this doesn't surprise me. However, I
    feel that the Tigers will win tonight - just a gut feeling.
    
    JD
29.535CAM::WAYIrene Ryan is SUCH a babe!Wed Sep 11 1991 17:0918
They are four games out.

But I don't think they can do it.  I think they had one too many slumps
early on after the All-Star Break.

Like a marathon runner who slows his pace due to cramping at mile
15, and the hell-bent-for-leather kick he puts on to try and win comes
up short, so to will the Red Sox come tantalizingly close, only to 
be a few seconds behind at the tape.


For the Sox to take the division, the Jays would have to stage one of 
the biggest choke jobs MLB has ever seen (or the Sox would have to 
be invincible...)


'Saw

29.536AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHWed Sep 11 1991 17:407
	Rich the last time I was on a Red Sox bandwagon it got four flats 
and a Boston metermaid cited it.  The Sox management has to be drooling 
over what Plantier is doing because they can bench Bruno and not have to 
guarantee the third year of his contract.  Remember the Who song "Won't get 
fooled again"?                  

				/Don
29.537They'll throw the money around with the best of 'emNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 11 1991 17:5316
    
> The Sox management has to be drooling 
> over what Plantier is doing because they can bench Bruno and not have to 
> guarantee the third year of his contract.  Remember the Who song "Won't get 
> fooled again"?                  
  
    Unfortunately, even though Bruno has deserved to be benched for
    non-performance (a fact that even he has graciously admitted to), it 
    appears that with late-inning defensive appearances Sox management is 
    going to do the exact opposite and allow him to reach his incentive 
    guarantee.  For all their stupidity, being tight-fisted has never
    really been one of the Sox' faults...
    
    glenn                                        
    
                                    
29.538RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Sep 11 1991 19:1733
    JD - I know,,,I remember what you said in the spring and I wuz one of
    the sceptics. But don't this make you just a little bit excited? I'll
    tell ya, the woodie that crept up lasted nite whilst I wuz watchin'
    Rojah was incredible. 
    
    /Don - Shame on ya, my lad. Ya follow the Brunze and da Celts yet ya
    let the Olde Yowne Team fend fer itself in September. I've been burned
    as many times, son, but sumthin' keeps calling back. "Rich, Oh Rich,
    bend over Rich...."
    
    'Saw - Come on Man. The Mets and Yanks are out of it. The Phillies and
    Orioles sip. Da Only team in the northeast dat has a chance is the
    beloved Sox. Stand up on your box and beat yur manly chest and cheer on
    dem Sox. Get your Matt Young poster out from behind the wall and hang
    it up for all to see and adore. Matt Young ROOLZE.
    
    Everyone now, get ready nexted time Luis Rivera comes to da plate....
    "Looo-IE, Looo-IE,  Looo-IE". 
    
    How 'bout dat Tony Pena fella. What a many type guy!
    
    Are we all THAT gun shy? ........... I know..............my name is Dan
    Schneider. The Yanks could eat the Sox for breakfast lunch and dinner.
    That silly bandbox the Sox play in would not even pass as a dugout for
    the great Yankees. Wade Boggs has no woodie. Never has.Never will. He
    does, however, survive thanks to the park effect. Wade could not play
    for any other team. If Wade played in the national league he would not
    have had one hit, ever.
    
    Now!!!! Juices running now? 
    
    Rich
    
29.539CAM::WAYIrene Ryan is SUCH a babe!Wed Sep 11 1991 19:2816
Rich, you slay me... 8^)

I'd *love* to see the Sox do it.

But you know I was thinking last night, what would I *ever* do if the
Sox were to win all the marbles.  I mean, I have NO idea?

I'd be like speechless (a condition which the Chainsaw is *rarely* in)
and I'd be like the high school kid who suddenly realizes his fantasy
and has a live, naked [enter Supermodel name of choice] in front of him
begging him for sex.

No, I'd rather be safe and secure in my own little niche right here, knowing
the Sox are going to do an el-foldo just like always ;^)

'Saw
29.540CARROL::LEFEBVREFor best results, squeeze bottomWed Sep 11 1991 19:377
    Jd, I have to belly up to the bar and order a heaping plate of crow. 
    I predicted in pre-season that the middle and short relief were
    questionable and that the Sox would fail as a result.  
    
    Gray, Lamp, Fossas and Reardon have proved me wrong.
    
    Mark.
29.541Wade Boggs has no woodie! Classic!NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 11 1991 19:451
    
29.542Call to ArmsRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Sep 11 1991 19:5342
    A plane is flying over our Richmond office right now. It's writing
    words in the sky. Lemme see, it says:
    
    "Yanks still #1. Love, Jim Wardle"
    
    Plus, I just got a strange voice mail message:
    
    "Rich, pacKIt iN, (no kidding, voice mail can differentiate between
    upper and lower case) BuB. Sox Blow bIG tIme. YAnks ArE GrEaT. JiM
    DINSmoRe."
    
    Now Red Sox Fans. R We Going to stand for this? Huh? Of course not.
    Slasher, you are in charge of counter Wardle actions, see? 'Saw, you
    have a court order to tap my phone and tape any more incoming messages
    from JiM DInsMore. Mr. Boston has come out of retirement and will be
    releasing his "Get In Shape Red Sox Fans" video nexted week. JD - You
    are head of our West Coast bureau. That makes you the West Coast Bureau
    Chief. You get a secretary and a FAX machine. Your task is to ensure
    that Twin Peaks remains calm.
    
    Markie - Where are ya, lad? Still pissed at me for saying Bob Seger is
    GAWD!!!??? Well, let's put silly things behind us. You are assigned to
    watch Bob Gamere. make sure he doesn't jog around the Fenway after dark
    Bad publicity, ya know.
    
    Hey Hawkman....what gives? Get in touch with your bested friend, Jeff,
    and start writing letters to the editor of every major paper in America
    proclaiming Red Sox Resurrection day.
    
    How's about our Southwest Bureau Chief Mike Heiser? Come on, young man,
    stand up and be counted. You need to ensure no insurgents cross the
    border and bolster the Blue Jays roster. And where is Bruce May? Still
    in the Bay? We need you to root on Oakland and sabotage Toronto's water
    supply when they play in Oakland. You are also encouraged to praise
    Jose's pecs loudly in front of the Jays' dugout.
    
    Come on Guys, Schneid, JimWa and Dinz have initiated an insult to our
    manliness. We need to respond and stand up tall behind our Fenway
    heros.
    
    Rich
    
29.543RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBrowardCountyPimpService,erPoliceWed Sep 11 1991 19:5327
    Mark -
    
    THe relief has been a pretty good.  I thought that Darwin and Young
    would make a difference - but its really been guys like Fossas and
    Hesketh who have done it.
    
    Rich -
    
    Y'know, I have a feeling that the Sox can do it - but I admit my
    pre-season optimism is dampered byu one thing.  I call it the "Red
    Sox/Boston so close, so far" syndrome.  The way I see, the Sox end up a
    game, maybe 3 behind the Jays.  The ol' false sense of security creeps
    in.  All trades are quashed, cuz the Sox won't give up on anyone cuz
    they got so close.  The No Riskers will win out.  The team will be the
    same as this year.  The same questions.  ANd management and the fans
    will hope they can crank the ride up again for a decent season.
    
    I really felt before the season that this was THE season for the Sox to
    do it.  I also felt that if they didn't do it, that they should
    dismantle and try to build another team.  As I've said, I'd like them
    to get radical - go for speed and defense and pitching.  Become the
    AL's answer to the Cards of the 80's.  That won't happen, however.
    
    I do fear, Rich, another season where the Sox provide excitement, some
    entertainment, but aren't on the tube come the end of October...
    
    JD
29.544Need offense as much as pitching! Can kids fill the bill?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 11 1991 20:3440
    
    > The team will be the
    > same as this year.  The same questions.  ANd management and the fans
    > will hope they can crank the ride up again for a decent season.
      
    Not with Phil Plantier and Mo Vaughn around for the whole season.  My
    feelings are that these two are the real thing, and if management had
    gotten them up a little bit earlier when the offense was positively
    sucking wind behind the likes of the underachieving Bruno, Burks,
    Clark (for large chunks of the season), et al, things might be a 
    little bit different right now.
    
    But other than that, I agree with you, JD, the Sox need to make some
    moves.  I'd be shocked if they didn't, though-- Gorman has already
    acknowledged the overload at the outfield/1B/DH positions with the 
    arrival of the two kids and has publicly stated that the issue will 
    be taken care of this winter.  My only concern is that they make the 
    *right* decisions.  The Sox have been active with trades in the past 
    and badly burned by stupidity in the pre-Gorman years (Sparky Lyle, 
    Cecil Cooper, Ben Oglivie, Carlton Fisk) just as much as they can be 
    criticized for inactivity in the Gorman era.  I can just envision them
    pulling a real boner like deciding that Wade Boggs is the problem with
    the team or something like that, too.  I can definitely live with a 
    trade of Greenwell, Quintana, or even Burks (would have to get a CF in 
    return) for fair value, though... 
    
    I can't see where you can say that the Sox have been complacent over at
    least the past few off-seasons.  There have been some important players 
    shuttling in and out of here recently, mostly for the worst, in my 
    opinion (Hurst, Boddicker, Lee Smith).  The wisdom of some of the 
    decisions is certainly open to question.  The Matt Young decision
    probably fills out the top five slots on that list.
    
    Bottom line is that I give them 4-5 years where they can still put a
    solid team around a still-dominating Roger Clemens and make a run at 
    it.  If it doesn't happen in that time period, there's going to be 
    rebuilding whether people want it or not... 
    
    glenn
    
29.545HAVASU::HEISERthe rock stomps here!Wed Sep 11 1991 21:2515
>    How's about our Southwest Bureau Chief Mike Heiser? Come on, young man,
>    stand up and be counted. You need to ensure no insurgents cross the
>    border and bolster the Blue Jays roster. And where is Bruce May? Still
>    in the Bay? We need you to root on Oakland and sabotage Toronto's water
>    supply when they play in Oakland. You are also encouraged to praise
>    Jose's pecs loudly in front of the Jays' dugout.
    
    Bruce is in the desert down the highway from me.  I've called Ft.
    Huachuca and alerted the border patrol, but all I heard on the other
    end was cynical laughter.  I love the BoSox, but have been jilted one
    time too many.  If they win the division, fine.  Then they will just
    lose to the Twins (who seemed to manhandle them a few times this
    summer.  I remember scores like 19-2.)
    
    Mike
29.546No room for optimismCARROL::LEFEBVREFor best results, squeeze bottomThu Sep 12 1991 10:253
    Sox are toast.
    
    Mark.
29.548AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHThu Sep 12 1991 11:357
    	Forget it Rich!  I don't care if the sad Yankees sweep the Sox.
    The Red Sox are a team for New England's yuppies, kind of like the
    Celtics.  The Broons and Pats are the only teams left for us New
    England fans who still wash our hands with Lava soap (i.e. a main's
    main type of team).
    
    				/Don
29.549FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 12 1991 11:4421
    4/30	Boston 7	at Minnesota 5
    5/1		Boston 0	at Minnesota 1
    5/7		at Boston 3	Minnesota 9
    5/8		at Boston 8	Minnesota 3
    7/11	Boston 3	at Minnesota 7
    7/12	Boston 4	at Minnesota 5
    7/13	Boston 1	at Minnesota 3
    7/14	Boston 5	at Minnesota 3
    7/18	at Boston 3	Minnesota 11
    7/19	at Boston 2	Minnesota 3
    7/20	at Boston 0	Minnesota 8
    7/21	at Boston 1	Minnesota 14
    
    Record:  Boston wins 3, Minnesota wins 9, with Boston winning 2 on the
    road and 1 at home.
    
    Runs:  Boston 37 (17 home, 20 road), Minnesota 74 (24 home, 50 road).
    
    Stick a fork in 'em.  They're done.
    
    John
29.550Beat Da YanksRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Sep 12 1991 11:5816
    Well, now, such sceptecism. The Sox losted last night after a supreme
    effort by Matt Young got wasted. Evryone's talking defeatism. Hell,
    team, they shoot you for that in Soviet Georgia. Markie, you don't even
    get a blindfold and a slice of pizza.
    
    Now Joe Bore-gan's band moves into the Bronx asylum. That Noriega
    lackey, Pascal Perez goes for the Yanks against that wholesome lad Mr.
    Morton whose sister is a nun and whose father is is sister's father.
    Yankee Stadium in September, me boys. Let's get behind 'em.
    
    I'm not askin' for a Denver Bronco type crowd or a brie-eatin', BMW
    drivin', Muffy-datin' gang of Docker-wearin' YUPS. Bring back the
    Narragansett drinkin', Yaz bashin' gang of old and cheer this group on.
    
    Rich
    
29.551RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Sep 12 1991 12:0739
    JD and Glenn,
    
    My serious hat is on. In all candor, the Sox don't look to be making
    the kinds of changes, from within, that will transform them into the
    kind of team we all know is needed for the fuiture. Pawtucket led the
    IL in HR's and was last in stolen bases. I saw them a couple of times
    and they played old style Red Sox baseball....station to station.
    
    There are no phenom pitching prospects on the farm so any help for
    Clemens will have to come via trade.
    
    Pawtucket had the oldest team - age wise - in the IL. Lancelotti and
    Pankovits are over 30. So is Jeff Stone, I believe. Mickey Pena has yet
    to prove himself and Zupcic is a big guy who reminds me of Bob Allison.
    Lot's of power potential with less than average speed. And he started
    in CF for them.
    
    I would love to see some creative trading this winter. I would keep
    Burks but have Quintana, Greenwell and Brunansky on the table.
    Greenwell and Carlos are both .300 hitters so there has to be some
    value there. I would like to see them get 1 quality starting pitcher
    and a quality OFer with speed out of that deal.
    
    One thing to remember when discussing the Sox, though. Joe Carter and
    Ozzie Smith both said that Boston is one place where they wouyld NOT
    allow themselves to be traded to because of the racial climate in the
    city. This is significant becuase there are likely many other quality
    players who feel the same way.
    
    The Sox don't teach speed in the minors. There is no great pitching on
    the farm. Sox management seems to be committed to the same style of
    play that has characterized the team for the past umpteen years. It
    fills the stands and has produced competitive teams for decades.
    Perhaps WE are wrong, who knows?
    
    But, in any event, they are my Sox and I'll be behind them 100%. 
    
    Rich
     
29.552CNTROL::CHILDSAssassinate Steve Erkel NowThu Sep 12 1991 12:085
 Soxs are out of it. How else can one explain Clemens actually winning games
 in September?

 
29.553STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 12 1991 12:1212
    re .551:
    
    > I would love to see some creative trading this winter. I would keep
    > Burks but have Quintana, Greenwell and Brunansky on the table.
    
    Sox could've had Pete Harnisch for the Q last winter.
    
    Quintana and Greenwell could bring a decent return, but the Sox wouldn't
    get a box of Cracker Jacks for Bruno with his salary.
    
    
    py
29.554ExplanationRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Sep 12 1991 12:2318
    re <<< Note 29.547 by SASE::SZABO >>>
    >>                  -< The man was definitely racin'! >-

    >>Rich, send me up a handful of whatever it was that got you going
    >>yesterday afternoon...  :-)
    
    >>Hawk
    
    Hawk - it's called keg shine. Friend of mine in Lilburn, Georgia gave
    me some. Said, "Son, Ya cain't say ya been to Dixie iffin yan haven't
    slugged Keg Shine."
    
    It is brewed like moonshine but they put the nectar in a barrel in the
    ground for a few days to "add color". Stuff would put hair on Heather
    Locklear's chest.
    
    Rich
    
29.555CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 12 1991 12:399
    One reason the Sox don't have much pitching on the farm this past
    season was they were put right into Fenway with injuries to Darwin and
    Young.  The Sox had at least 3 teams in their farm system compete in
    the post season.  They can't be doing too bad down there.
    
    I think the collar is tightening around the collective neck of the Blue
    Jays.  They dropped their second straight at home against Seattle.  If
    the Sox had been able to figure out that "mediocre" Tiger pitching
    lasted night, we could be looking at the Jays from only 3 games out.
29.556RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBrowardCountyPimpService,erPoliceThu Sep 12 1991 13:0513
    Glenn -
    
    I hope Plantier is the real thing - I haven't had a chance to see that
    much - since the SOX aren't on much out here.  I'd like to see
    Greenwell and Q traded for some pitching - or for a standout all around
    infielder - but there aren't too many of them on the block.  
    
    And yes, the Sox have made moves the last few seasons - but I guess
    what I meant is the moves seem to be same old Sox type moves - even
    though I thought Jack Clark was going to be a good pickup - someone to
    supply a real power threat and get 100+ ribbys.  
    
    JD
29.557How can so-called "fans" *not* be interested?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 12 1991 13:5622
   > Forget it Rich!  I don't care if the sad Yankees sweep the Sox.
   > The Red Sox are a team for New England's yuppies, kind of like the
   > Celtics.  The Broons and Pats are the only teams left for us New
   > England fans who still wash our hands with Lava soap (i.e. a main's
   > main type of team).
    
    Sorry, Slasher, but all the yuppies jumped off the bandwagon after the 
    horrendous July.  The bleachers have been seriously de-populated the
    past few weekend series.  I've noticed a sudden absence of many so-called
    "regulars", with a lot of new faces out there all of a sudden.  Rest
    assured, if the Sox magically back into the playoffs or something, I'll
    see all those old faces out there again...
    
    I for one have not given up.  I don't predict that they're going to
    pull it off, but I'm not so serious about it that if they flop again
    I'll be too proud to watch the train wreck, either.  I'm just going
    to sit back and enjoy.  With *13* straight games against New York and
    Baltimore alone, you can't say it's over yet...
    
    glenn
     
29.558AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHThu Sep 12 1991 14:364
    	Dandy Don Merideth said it best... "Turn out the lights, the
    party's over"
    
    				/Don
29.559Pennenat Fever Grips ConfederacyRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Sep 13 1991 16:5822
    Peanuts, Popcorn, Cold Beah Heah............................
    
    Grab a seat and enjoy as the Red Sox continue their assault on the
    Toronto Blue Jays. 
    
    Lasted nite the Sox jumped on Pasqual "Little Manny" Perez. Gator
    Greenteeth came through as did the Peanut Man. Mr Morton looked sharp
    thru 6. Greenteeth also stole his 14th base of the season. Donbo Hair
    hit a meaningless home run as Joe Boregan used plenty of his bench in
    the 7-2 victory of the Yanks.
    
    Now Mr. Gardiner (not a relation to Wes "Jaws" Gardner) goes to the
    hill. 
    
    Could this be a Braves/Red Sox October? Ah, the words just trickle from
    the mouth like foam from a Krueger Cream Ale. Baseball in it's purest
    sense, on natural grass, the Braves and Red Sox.
    
    Go Sox
    
    Rich
    
29.560more infoHAVASU::HEISERthe rock stomps here!Fri Sep 13 1991 17:051
    Did Toronto win last night or were they idle?
29.561Go Blue Jays!AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHFri Sep 13 1991 17:111
    
29.562FDCV06::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Fri Sep 13 1991 17:123
    They had the nite off....
    
    REK
29.563RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri Sep 13 1991 18:5410
    Mike is taking the bait. FINALLY, a lad with the guts to ask a
    pennant-race-related question.
    
    My hat's off to ya, Mike ma lad. Welcome aboard. Have some peanuts and
    a cold beah. Sox in NY tonight while the Jays are entertaining the
    Atletics. Dave Stewart going for LaRussa's squad of manly men against
    that gaggle of domers.
    
    Rich
    
29.564HAVASU::HEISERthe rock stomps here!Fri Sep 13 1991 19:0814
29.565I'm with ya, Rich...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 13 1991 19:0930
                            
    > My hat's off to ya, Mike ma lad. Welcome aboard. Have some peanuts and
    > a cold beah. Sox in NY tonight while the Jays are entertaining the
    > Atletics. Dave Stewart going for LaRussa's squad of manly men against
    > that gaggle of domers.
    
    Like they say in that ripped-off Old Milwaukee commercial featuring 
    the Swedish bikini team and other ridiculous accoutrements, it most
    certainly does get better than this!  This is a real, honest-to-
    goodness pennant race, folks, and it's only gonna get closer.  I don't
    know who's going to win, but this is why all those players play all
    those ultimately meaningless games.  It's for these oh-so-few 
    important ones, that's what.
    
    The response to date in Boston has been decidedly underwhelming, I must
    say.  People in Atlanta are whacking each other with foam tomahawks
    like a bunch of lobotomized idiots, and they've got a lot more to 
    complain about in the history department than we do.  I know people 
    don't want to get burned again, but they were excited in April, so 
    why not now when the real thing is here?  So there were a few bumps in 
    the road.  A hard-fought race is always more enjoyable than an easily 
    gained one.  Besides, one of these days it's really gonna happen, and 
    why not in a flukish, come-from-behind way?  (That's *not* a
    prediction, by the way.)
    
    I know, I know; Sox are toast... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
     
29.566RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Sep 16 1991 12:1011
    Sox take 3 out of 4 in Yankee Stadium and now return home to Fenway to
    entertain the Orioles while Toronto heads west starting in Seattle
    tonight. The gut tells me we will be in 1st by the weekend.
    
    Roger has taken pages from Bob Gibson and Don Drysdale. Someone burns
    him, he makes 'em pay. 
    
    Go Sox
    
    Rich
    
29.567back atcha big guy!GENRAL::WADEMon Sep 16 1991 13:075
    
    	I thought I was gonna die laughing last night when Matt
    	Nokes fired that ball back at Clemens.  :^)
    
    	Claybone
29.568Couple of excitement-filled games this past weekendNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 16 1991 13:3414
    > Roger has taken pages from Bob Gibson and Don Drysdale. Someone burns
    > him, he makes 'em pay. 
    
    Not only did Roger send out an obvious message, he may have sucked the
    Yanks into the retaliation trap and cost them the game.  A couple
    innings later, it looked like Guetterman was trying to give Greenwell
    the old kneecap job (either that or he temporarily lost his control
    very badly).  It was a real weak effort, with Greenwell backing into
    the pitch as it brushed the back of his calf muscle, and he later ended
    up scoring the winning run...
    
    glenn
    
29.569FDCV07::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Mon Sep 16 1991 13:566
    Gleen, Gutterman tossed a soft inside curve to Greenwell, and Greenwell
    took the pitch to get to first.. 
    
    REK
    
    PS Greenwell did not try to get out of the way of that pitch....
29.570RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Sep 16 1991 14:0322
    A ghame like lasted night's is a classic reason WHY this conference
    misses the likes of Jim Wardle and Dan Schneider. You just know that
    these two would be in here today whining about Clemens. They would
    bring up that game versus the Tigers where Clemens gave up two homers
    and then hit Shelby. 
    
    In Nokes' case, the Mat Man hit an RBI single off Roger his previous
    time up. So Roger sent a message.
    
    To be honest, I hate to see a guy intentionally thrown at. But, again,
    after seeing "When it Was a Game" on HBO, I started to feel that
    today's batters are pansies. If you have a guy the caliber of Clemens,
    Gibson, Drysdale and Ryan (all flame throwers) enhancing their
    performances by keeping the batter off guard, then I'm for it. 
    
    On the other hand, I remember when Sox 2nd baseman Doug Griffen was
    beaned by a Ryan fastball some years back and I recall the hush that
    came over the room as we all wondered whether the guy would get up
    again.
    
    Rich
    
29.571HAVASU::HEISERthe rock stomps here!Mon Sep 16 1991 15:2310
    So how did the Jays do?  How far back are the Sox now?
    
>    On the other hand, I remember when Sox 2nd baseman Doug Griffen was
>    beaned by a Ryan fastball some years back and I recall the hush that
>    came over the room as we all wondered whether the guy would get up
>    again.
    
    I remember that.  Nolan was pretty wild in his younger days.
    
    Mike
29.572three and a half and counting....GEMVAX::HILLMon Sep 16 1991 15:521
    Jays lost to the As, so the Sox are 3-1/2 back.
29.573STAR::YANKOWSKASWho cares where Waldo is?Mon Sep 16 1991 15:5313
    re .571:
    
    Blue Jays lost to Oakland yesterday; their lead over the Red Sox is now
    3-1/2 games.
      
    Toronto is idle tonight while the Sox start a 3-game set at home
    against the Orioles.  For those Sox fans who've already penciled in Ws
    for tonight, tomorrow, and Wednesday, a gentle reminder that Baltimore
    is 5-2 against the Sox so far this year (and has a healthy Glenn Davis
    this time around).
    
    
    py
29.574SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 17 1991 13:5217
    REK, the pitch at Greenwell was behind him.  I think a batter's first
    instinct is to step back when a pitch is coming at him.  Even the ESPN
    announcers said Greenwell had nowhere to go.  It was good to see a
    batter trot to first for a change rather than charge the mound
    (especially considering this could have been retaliation).  Nokes
    throwing the ball back at Clemens was bush.  Clemens jawing at him when
    he reached first was also uncalled for -- he should have just drilled
    him with a pickoff throw ;^).
    
    Rich, there is a big difference between pitching inside and
    headhunting.  Unfortunately fans, batters, and umps these days don't
    understand that.
    
    Sox and Jays both lost last night.
    
    Paul, next time you see that oriole in your backyard, do all Sox fans a
    favor and chase it away for the next few days.
29.575Pennant fever grips Deliverance Dude...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 18 1991 19:0030
    I went to the Sox game last night, and while it was an excellent game,
    I'm pretty positive that I had the Deliverance Dude's dad (DDD?) next
    to me (or maybe his uncle, or both).  From the earlier descriptions, I 
    don't think it was the 'Dude himself, because he seemed a little older, 
    but not too much older, maybe only ten or twelve years or whatever's
    biologically feasible...
    
    Well anyway, this guy was whooping up a storm on some pretty tame 
    stuff, like a called strike for Kevin Morton (he called him Morty; maybe 
    they're related too?) with the count at 2-0.  He kept leaning over and
    repeating stuff to me, too, like "Cleveland's beating Detroit, 3-1",
    even though I could see the score too and had already told him the
    first time that I was more concerned about Toronto right now.  Then,
    late in the game, he asked me who was warming in the bullpen. 
    "Reardon", I replied.  A half-inning later, it was "guess who's coming 
    in next inning?"  Still later, in the top of the ninth, it was "guess
    who's coming in *now*?"  Uh, gee, lemme guess now, could it be...
    Reardon?
    
    Didn't hear any "Eeeeeee, eeeeee, eeeeees", though, except appended to
    the end of Luis Rivera's name.  He had the "Loueeeeeeee, Loueeeee" down 
    pretty well.
    
    Late in the game the guy tells me he doesn't even have a ticket to the
    game.  Apparently some cop he knows lets him in and he sits anywhere.  
    Go figure...
    
    glenn
    
29.576SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 18 1991 19:063
    It was nice to see a Sox player get the benefit of Pesky's Pole for a
    change.  It seems like the opposition always gets the benefit of the
    short porch in RF.
29.578SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 19 1991 14:063
    Sox are still 2.5 out as they hung on to win 7-5 over the O's last
    night.  Toronto blew a 1-0 lead the M's in the 8th last night, but came
    back to win the game in 12 innings.
29.579HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Sep 19 1991 14:174
       Ch 4 reported lasted night that the Sox are trying to pry Dewey away
    from the O's for the stretch drive. Seeing as how the OFers are
    dropping like flies this might not be a bad idea.
                               Denny
29.580No DEWEY...DEWEY...DEWEY this yearMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Sep 19 1991 14:245
    IF someone Out there has the schedule and the time could they enter
    who the Redsox have Left (h-a) and who toronto has left as well.
    Thanks. On the Dewey note, I wouldnt come back to the Sox's if I
    were him.  The Deal would have to include next season !!!
    								MaB
29.581SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 19 1991 14:254
    Too bad Dewey wouldn't be eligible for post season play should the Sox
    get him and pass Toronto in the standings.  It sure would be nice to
    give Evans one more chance at a WS ring after a long and productive
    career.
29.582FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 19 1991 15:2410
    Sox:  9/20-9/22 New York, 9/23-9/25 at Baltimore, 9/27-9/30 at
    Milwaukee, 10/1-10/3 Detroit, 10/4-10/6 Milwaukee.
    
    Jays:  9/20-9/22 at Oakland, 9/23-9/25 at California, 9/27-9/29
    Minnesota, 9/30-10/2 California, 10/4-10/6 at Minnesota
    
    Tigers:  9/20-9/22 Milwaukee, 9/23-9/26 Cleveland, 10/1-10/3 at Boston,
    10/4-10/6 at Baltimore
    
    John
29.583CSLALL::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Thu Sep 19 1991 15:244
    Heard this AM that Greenwell may be back next week.  A strained
    ligament, I believe.
    
    Lee
29.584SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 19 1991 15:374
    According to Doc Pappas, Greenwell's knee injury is not the cartilege
    tear they suspected, but rather a ligament strain as Lee said. 
    Ironically it is not the knee injury which will keep Gator out, but
    rather a severe groin pull he suffered on the same play.
29.585CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 26 1991 18:043
    The Sox win the first half of the twinbill in Baltimore 2-1.  Clemens
    pitches a complete game for his 18th win of the season.  Pretty soon
    even Mike Childs will be rooting for Roger to get his 3rd Cy Young ;^)
29.586AXIS::ROBICHAUDJohnHendry-99and44/100% objectiveThu Sep 26 1991 18:357
    	Sox better win that second game or they're toast.  Is it just
    coincidence that when the Boggs and Greenwell came back the Sox
    started losing?  Is it possible that when the team has guys that
    were managed by Butch Hobson in the lineup they're a better team?
    Hmm...
    
    				/Don
29.587USCTR2::NAHEARNThu Sep 26 1991 18:3911
    re: -1,
    
    /Don,   Your shot at Boggs in the previous reply is bogus!!!  Boggs
    missed what, 2 games??  He was there for their 30 wins in 40 games
    run...and hit about .380+ during it.  Seems to me that when Boggs is
    doing well, the Sox do well.
    
    
    Hope this hurts,
    
    Nelly
29.588they'll probably tease us until the last game of the yearHAVASU::HEISERhold me, I'm a fermataThu Sep 26 1991 19:411
29.589I'm mad as hell, and I'm not gonna bleepin' take it anymore!NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 26 1991 22:2615
    I'm afraid it really *is* all ovah but the cryin' now.  Unbelievable.
    In a can't-lose game the Sox blow a 5-1 lead and finally lose in the 
    bottom of the ninth, 6-5.  Reardon is apparently incapable of going in
    a *real* emergency save situation, and with a spent Greg Harris on the
    mound Joe Morgan has *nobody* in the pen warming until it's completely 
    obvious that Harris is done.  Even then, he's allowed to go ahead and
    walk the last two batters, forcing in the winning run.
    
    My dad called me from DC five minutes after this game was over and 
    asked if Morgan had been fired yet.  The guys on the HTS network 
    couldn't believe what they were seeing, I guess.
    
    glenn
     
29.590FDCV06::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Fri Sep 27 1991 11:0410
    Now that the Rex Sox snatched defeat from the jaws of victory lets 
    get down to basic math....
    
    If Toronto goes 5-4 in its remaining 9 games that will mean the 
    Red Sox will have to go 8-2 just to tie......
    
    REK
    Rosanne Arnold has been spotted going down the Mass Pike towards Fenway
    park with a wide-load sign on her butt... And she has a 10 piece band
    on board with her warming up....
29.591Now *those* are the Red Sox I'm used to... 8^)AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHFri Sep 27 1991 13:131
    
29.592sigh.RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODial-a-POPE 1-900-8255463Fri Sep 27 1991 14:4617
    Typical.  We were taken for a ride AGAIN!
    
    And next year, this team will be the same.  Changes won't happen.  WHy?
    Well Lou and the boys will say "Look, we came *so* close last year, and
    we had injuries, and the kids are really ready, and blah blah..."
    
    And we will eat it up, once again.  And the park will be filled.  And
    the SOx will take us for another ride.
    
    Rooting for the Red SOx is like getting a free ride on the Eternal
    Ferris Wheel of life.  However, you never get off, you either keep
    going around in circles, or get stuck right *NEAR* the top - always
    longfully looking at the guy stuck at the *TOP* with the good looking
    babe, while you are with your sister, a warm coke, and a dry box of
    popcorn.
    
    JD
29.593AXIS::ROBICHAUD1-900-FISHER-OF-MENFri Sep 27 1991 14:506
    	Think the Sox will try to get Mariano Duncan as a free agent?
    They need a shortstop and this guy can play the position and hit.
    Wrong skin tone for a Sox free agent acquisition though.  They prefer
    to prusue guys that are "a whiter shade of pale".  8^(
    
    				/Don
29.594CAM::WAYRIP Dr. SeussFri Sep 27 1991 15:0513
>    Wrong skin tone for a Sox free agent acquisition though.  They prefer
>    to prusue guys that are "a whiter shade of pale".  8^(

As Billy Connelly says in his comedy special:  "A pale blue Scottish person"...


re JD:

	What an analogy.  You should be writing novels my man...


'Saw

29.595CELTIK::JACOBMummifiedManInAustriaIsJimmyHoffaFri Sep 27 1991 15:0916
    Whilst watching SportsCenter this AM on ESPN, after the bit on the Sox
    blosing the 5-1 lead in the bottom of the ninth, and the pitcher(can't
    remember his name) walking in the winning run, they interviewed the
    pitcher and he said the problem was the umpires, not his.  He said the
    Umpire was giving up on the guy's breaking ball early and calling it a
    ball, no matter where it went.
    
    Joe Morgan also backed up his pitcher.
    
    IMHO, the guy should've thrown REAL strikes and not ones in his haid,
    and Morgan should've yanked the guy a batter or two earlier.
    
    Blame the Ump, did the guy go to Clemsuck or somethin???????
    
    JaKe
    
29.596CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 27 1991 15:147
29.597OuchSHALOT::HUNTDon't forget the coffee !!!Fri Sep 27 1991 15:2320
 The Billy Connolly special on HBO is a riot.   
 
 I was rolling when he was describing how dogs "do it" the right way.  
 
 	"C'mon, lads, everybody join in !!!"
 
 Methinks Sox fans have already packed their bags.  Sure, yesterday's
 loss was oh-so-familiar but we're talkin' Blue Jays here.   They
 haven't salted it away yet either and they have their own famous
 Snuff Chokes, too.  "1987" still rings loud and clear in their ears.
 
 Still, couldn't help but wonder if Elrod Hendricks wasn't somehow
 smiling as Harris heaved ball four yesterday.   Recall the Fenway
 Faithful were giving the O's the "Choke, choke!" cheer two seasons
 ago as the Birds came miraculously close to winning the East.  
 
 Hendricks shot back that the Sox fans certainly knew that they were
 talking about.   Yes, indeed.
 
 Bob Hunt
29.598AXIS::ROBICHAUD1-900-FISHER-OF-MENFri Sep 27 1991 15:359
29.599Can they do it ???SHALOT::HUNTDon't forget the coffee !!!Fri Sep 27 1991 15:4110
29.600see ya thursday for the final nail...CNTROL::CHILDSUpthrutheCracksOutthruthebrokenGlassFri Sep 27 1991 16:019
 Like Bob said remember 87? Naw why don't you guys forget it. It's more
 fun watching you guys praise, beat, slash, write off/on Joe's bums...

 :^)!!!!!!!!

 Is Boggs still sitting out protecting his batting average???

 mike
29.601he did play yesterdayCHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 27 1991 16:043
29.602his stripes have been reveal before...CNTROL::CHILDSthatelectricprescription4urFunkyIllsFri Sep 27 1991 16:258
 Simple:

 	Give Franco a week to drop. If he doesn't then attack him for a
 week. If he doesn't catch him he can plam the layoff. We are talking 
 about Wade aren't we?

 mike
29.603CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 27 1991 16:314
29.604Been quiet huh?SALEM::DODAWith autumn closing in...Fri Sep 27 1991 16:424
Mike's just pissed that the Rocket's got another Cy under 
wraps...

daryll
29.605CNTROL::CHILDSthatelectricprescription4urFunkyIllsFri Sep 27 1991 17:127
 He ain't got wrapped up yet. If he gets it, it's because he gets so much
 overhyped press. He was awesome out of the gate sucked pondwater in the
 middle and is suddenly hot again. I would think a more consistant pitcher
 like Mark Langston or Jim Abbott deserves it more....

 mike
29.606CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 27 1991 17:205
    C'mon Mike, put your personal bias aside for a moment.  Roger Clemens
    is in the #1 or 2 slot in each of the categories used to judge starting
    pitchers, ERA, Wins, Ks, BA against, IP, Complete Games, etc.  Most
    pitchers in the AL would have loved to be sucking the same pond water
    Clemens did in the middle of the season.
29.607uh-huhSALEM::DODAWith autumn closing in...Fri Sep 27 1991 17:214
Nice but Langston got his haid handed to him a couple of days ago 
and Abbott couldn't buy a win for the first month of the season.

daryll
29.608Too damn many heartbreakers this season...ARWEN::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 27 1991 17:2821
    Way too funny, Mike.  A 6-0 start and a 6-0 finish (to date) with an
    ERA of around 1.00 combined over those stretches, with a "pondwater 
    sucking" 6-8 oreo middle of an ERA of around 3.25.  Yeah, you're 
    better off finding someone more "consistent".
    
    The big problem with this edition of the Sox, in spite of the comeback, 
    is that they woefully underachieved through the beginning of August.  
    I know JD won't like this, but last year's team *did* 
    uncharacteristically overachieve (with great pitching backed by 
    precious little run scoring, combined with mucho clutch performances in
    the tough ones-- check out the record in one-run decisions).  This 
    year's team has lost so many close games that were seemingly in the 
    bank and has been victimized by enough bouts with stupidity by the 
    manager that thinking about where they *should* be but how close it 
    appears they'll fall short almost makes you wanna cry...
    
    Ain't over till it's over, though.
    
    glenn
      
29.609FSDEV::MGILBERTKids are our Future-Teach 'em WellFri Sep 27 1991 17:4610
    
    While it's still going to be tough I think the schedule still favors
    the Sox. The Jays have to face Minnesota for 3 days at home and then 3
    with the Angels before finiishing with 3 in Minnesota. That's 6 games
    against the winners of the AL west and the last 3 on the road. The Sox
    get 4 games against the sub .500 Brewers in Milwaukee and then come
    home to finish with 3 against detroit(who've lost 7 of their last 10)
    and 3 more with the brewers.
    
    
29.610RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODial-a-POPE 1-900-8255463Fri Sep 27 1991 17:498
    If the Sox pull it out, Clemens wins easily.  If they don't, I hope
    Erickson gets it, or someone else from Minnesota.  If Clemens gets  it
    then, it won't be too surprising.  Hype and bigger markets always win
    over smaller markets (see Valenzuela over Seaver, 1981...)
    
    Plus, the voters are always enamoured by the power pitcher...
    
    JD
29.611CNTROL::CHILDSthatelectricprescription4urFunkyIllsFri Sep 27 1991 17:5110
 yeah but what you guys fail to include and realize is that ROGER is the
 beneficiary of the largest strike zone on the planet. Hey I ain't say
 he isn't good but he's not the Greatest. He gets way to many gifts for
 me to consider him great. Toss in his personality and line of excuse
 (after he snaps the loosing streak we hear about tendenitis) and for
 me you have as Big Russ Thompson would say a "Waste of Skin"....

 mike

29.612HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Sep 27 1991 18:015
       Yeah, right Mike. After his runin with Cooney lasted year his strike
    zone must be up to the size of a matchbook by now.
       The Twins will coast as soon as they clinch. Even the Jays will be
    able to beat them then.
                                        Denny
29.613FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Sep 27 1991 18:0214
    Mike, has it ever occurred to you that Roger Clemens has *EARNED* that
    large strike zone by his great performances in the early part of his
    career.  Let us face it, whether we like it or not, the great
    performers in baseball earn a certain amount of respect from the Men in
    Blue.  For example, Ted Williams would seldom get a strike called on
    him if he didn't swing at the pitch.  Does that diminish his
    achievements?  I don't think it diminishes Roger's - he's earned that
    respect.  His personality has nothing to do with it, or shouldn't.
    
    I have no complaint with the way the Sox have played since August 7. 
    It was the 3 month stretch from May 17-August 7, when they went 31-51,
    that will ultimately kill them.
    
    John
29.614CAM::WAYRIP Dr. SeussFri Sep 27 1991 18:0718

 The Red Sox go undefeated the rest of the way while Toronto self-destructs.

 The global warming trend mysteriously stops, and equilibrium returns.

 All off the Great Lakes are found to be clean enough to drink from.

 Governor(?) Weicker comes in one morning and repeals the income tax by
 	executive order.

 Jamie Lee Curtis has a chance meeting with Chainsaw, gives up her family
	and acting, and yearns to follow his rugby career.,...




Yup, the Dead must be in town again........
29.615can't get it up against the sub-500 teamsCSCMA::FINIZIOHey Get a grep on itFri Sep 27 1991 18:0910
    
    
    	All we keep hearing is how the sox will have it easy facing
    	the sub .500 eastern division teams......in the case of
    	two of them (Balt & New York) they couldn't take the season
    	series from them. Why should Milwaukee be any easier? In the
    	past 6 games they're 3-3 vs sub .500 teams.....
    
    		Or maybe it's the Park affects......?
    
29.616Sox are much better than Pseudo Sox FansUSCTR2::NAHEARNFri Sep 27 1991 18:1418
    I believe that the Sox can go 8-2 while the Jays go 5-4.  I also
    believe that the Sox would/will win the playoff game and go on to beat
    the Twins.  .....and, until proven wrong...I'm no more incorrect than
    all you naysayers.
    
    Further, even if the Sox DON'T come through....SO WHAT!!??  I'm one fan
    that appreciates the fact that they are competitive year in, year out.
    Being a FAN has NOTHING to do with requiring a winning team!!!  If
    winning IS a prerequisite for one to follow a team, then that
    individual is pretty pathetic IMHO.
    
    Lastly, is there any way for me to program my keyboard and/or 'next
    unseen' key to skip any replies from Mike Childs regarding Roger
    Clemens?
    
    Thanks in advance for your help......
    
    Nelly
29.617CAM::WAYRIP Dr. SeussFri Sep 27 1991 18:2028
>    Being a FAN has NOTHING to do with requiring a winning team!!!  If


ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
ACC Chris is a FAN 
29.618 Yanks sip.CRBOSS::DERRYFri Sep 27 1991 18:214
    Hey Bob... These are for you, buddy.
    
    GONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONG
    GONG...
29.619NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 27 1991 18:3211
    > If winning IS a prerequisite for one to follow a team, then that
    > individual is pretty pathetic IMHO.                             
    
    I couldn't agree more, Nelly.  For instance, in addition to being a
    Boston Red Sox fan but not much of one for the Celtics or Bruins, I'm
    also a *big* fan of North Carolina football, but I can't stand their
    basketball team.  Some things go deeper than winning or losing...
    
    glenn
    
29.620Go Sox! (Yes, I'm a FAN.)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Sep 27 1991 18:456
    I'm curious W-main (tm).  Why the love for Carolina football?  Does
    this date back to our Lawrence Taylor glory years, or is this a recent
    phenomenon.  (Like, is Mack Brown your distant cousin or somethin' ...)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
29.621;^)CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 27 1991 19:489
    When was the last time the Sox won the World Series?
    
    1918
    
    What other memorable event happened in 1918?
    
    The Russian Revolution
    
    Bet the farm on the Red Sox!!!!
29.622I thought the Russian Revolution was in 1917.VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Fri Sep 27 1991 19:500
29.623CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 27 1991 19:554
29.624CAM::WAYRIP Dr. SeussFri Sep 27 1991 19:5814
>    It sounded good after a few post-practice beers last night.  I guess I
>    better call my bookie and cancel that bet ;^)


Well, I was a good boy after practice.  I had three glasses of ice
water and a pint of ginger ale.

I've lost six pounds of late.


The Sox stand as much chance of winning the series as I do of discovering
how to beam people around a la Star Trek.....

'Saw
29.625FDCV06::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Sat Sep 28 1991 01:456
    Saw, you could save DEC with that invention!!!!
    
    BTW, Jays win tonight and the Sox are behind 7-2 in the top of the
    7th.......
    
    REK
29.626Nelly hit the coma key above the enter on the little keyboard...CNTROL::CHILDSthatelectricprescription4urFunkyIllsMon Sep 30 1991 12:118
 John, why should they? I think this attitude of they've earn the respect
 is BS. Ok throw the personality crap out of it but Cooney's tossing out
 of Roger last year was the best thing that ever happened to Roger cause
 the Umps treated him with kid gloves this year. Nice strike zone and they
 allowed him to throw at batters without repercusion....

 mike
29.627Dead SoxTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPMon Sep 30 1991 12:267
    
    They did it again...
    
    Thye gave the fans just enough to make us think thye had a chance, and
    then blew it.  This time it wasn't in the playoffs at least.
    
    =Bob=
29.628MCIS1::DHAMELDr. Seuss, M. Davis, R. SoxMon Sep 30 1991 12:402
    
    
29.629FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Sep 30 1991 12:4336
    Mike, I'm not saying I agree with the psychology of umpiring but it's
    something that exists, it's known, the players understand it and
    respect it.  It happens in other situations too.  Take, for example,
    the phantom doubleplay.  This happens when the shortstop steps on the
    bag before even having the ball and doesn't stay on the bag waiting for
    it to arrive.  More often than not the umpire will call the runner out
    because the umpire figures that the runner would have been out anyway
    and why get the shortstop hurt waiting for it.
    
    In the case of umpiring around the plate, if a pitcher proves that he
    can throw to a certain spot on a regular basis (just off the plate for
    example) and the hitters are swinging at it consistently, then if the
    pitcher throws the same pitch later on in the game and the batter
    doesn't swing, then as long as the catcher doesn't have to lunge for
    the ball it will generally be called a strike.  Why?  The pitcher has
    proven that in most cases, it's a strike.  Umpires prefer to call
    pitches when the pitcher has good control - it's less work, less
    aggravation and more consistent.  The pitcher who can throw strikes
    consistently will tend to have a bigger strike zone.
    
    In Roger's case, when he can establish the high fastball and the batter
    is swinging at it and he has his good control then it will be called a
    strike.
    
    A good player in any sport (basketball and baseball are perhaps the
    worst) earns respect from the officials and they get more of a break
    than a mediocre player.  Right or wrong, that's they way it is and the
    players learn to adjust to it.  As long as it's consistent I have no
    problem with it, and the players all understand it and adjust to it. 
    Fair?  Not completely.  Understandable?  Yes.  Acceptable?  To me, yes.
    
    John
    
    PS - Sox must go unbeaten to force a tie if Toronto wins 2 games.  Sox
    must win 6/7 if Toronto wins 1 game and must go 5-2 if Toronto goes
    winless.  Stick a fork in them.
29.630Enjoy him now, there won't be another soon...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 30 1991 13:0316
    Assuming Mike's not just yanking chains, he should consider one thing. 
    While Roger Clemens is not the greatest pitcher of all time, he is the
    greatest in the game today and has been for at least five years.  Even
    if you're not a Sox fan, if you're a baseball fan and you live near 
    Boston you should appreciate that FACT for what it means and derive any 
    possible enjoyment out of it that you can.  The odds and common sense 
    say that when Clemens goes, it will probably be the 22nd century before 
    you ever see Boston holding the game's best pitcher over such a 
    significant period of time again...
    
    This being Boston, though, undoubtedly many of Clemens' biggest fans
    will only emerge long after he's hung 'em up...
    
    glenn
    
29.631Hate to say I told you so, but...AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHMon Sep 30 1991 14:201
    
29.633not sure about playoff recordCNTROL::CHILDSthatelectricprescription4urFunkyIllsMon Sep 30 1991 18:0022
  <<< Note 29.632 by CNTROL::CHILDS "thatelectricprescription4urFunkyIlls" >>>
                       -< not sure about playoff record >-


 John, for you it's acceptable for me it's not unless of course it's
 Larry leaning into his defender to rub him off. ;^) You're correct
 (nothing new here) that it's allowed everywhere even in the holy bastin
 of college bball where a certain bum ass coach can walk halfway out 
 on to the court without getting a T...

 Glenn, yes when it comes to Roger my main emphasis is chain yankin but
 I still don't buy him as the best pitcher in the game today. Maybe best
 power pitcher but not best pitcher. My personal favorite for that honor
 is "Sweet Music". I like a guy who can throw all the pitches not just 
 the fast ones. Also I don't see how you can label the guy "the greatest"
 when he has yet to win a post season or world series game?

 mike

    


29.634CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 30 1991 18:0712
29.635As the evidence overwhelmingly supports...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 30 1991 18:4417
    > Post season W/L (or regular season W/L for that matter) has alot to do
    > with the production of the rest of the team.
    
    Like if that <unmentionable> Calvin Schiraldi had held on to either of 
    the two leads he was given in Game 6 of the 1986 World Series.  If he 
    had held the original lead Clemens gave him after seven innings, Clemens 
    would have posted wins in the deciding games of both the ALCS and WS 
    (giving up one and two runs respectively), and they'd both be heroes 
    today.  Alas...
    
    Still, Clemens' overall performance in the postseason (he has won a game
    in spite of Mike's claims) is only average.  Those seven starts don't
    change my total assessment of him as the best in the game today, though.
    
    glenn
     
29.636MCIS1::DHAMELDr. Seuss, M. Davis, R. SoxMon Sep 30 1991 18:4915
    
    The bandwagon rolled out of Kenmore Square on it's final run of the
    season.  The old calliope would be silent for the season, and the
    wooden wheels that rumbled over the cobblestones were not nearly enough
    to drown out the shrill singing of the fat lady around the corner.
    
    Dogs came out of the alleys to bark at the rickety contraption and nip
    and the fetlocks of the tired horses as they wearily sauntered down
    Commonwealth Ave.  "Last stop," croaked the aqualunged driver as the
    remaining passengers disembarked for their new destination outside the
    Boston Garden.  "Broon fans to the left, Celtic fans to the right. 
    Thank you for joining us, and have a good winter."
    
    Dickstah
    
29.637CNTROL::CHILDSthatelectricprescription4urFunkyIllsMon Sep 30 1991 18:497
 Like I said Glenn, I wasn't positive if he had or hadn't won a post season 
 game.

 So what Mac? How many games did His Highness win in August? Everyone has 
 slumps. A slider is still a power pitch in my book and a curve at 80+ is
 still a power pitch. 
29.639RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOIs Paris Burning?Mon Sep 30 1991 18:5928
    Over the lat 5 years, Clemens may be the best, but in individual years,
    there are other pitchers I'd take.
    
    And I'd start with the 88 Orel Hershiser.  He became unhittable down
    the stretch, through the playoffs, and into the series.  He carried the
    Dodgers to the Series win on his back.  And that's something truley
    great athletes can do.  Roger Clemens has not done that.  Ever.  
    
    He seems to start great, then slump.  He reflects the Sox.  He puts up
    good stats.  He gets the fans all worked up.  But alas, no champeenship
    banner.
    
    I feel SOX fans always have to have a guy they can say is the best, the
    greatest.  In some way, it makes them feel good.  Sometimes I think
    SOME Sox fans (notice use of word SOME) would rather have Wade win the
    batting title, Roger the Cy and get other awards then win.  
    
    I've already seen the 'wait til next year note' in the SOX conference,
    and true to form, have seen the 'Sox as Over Achievers' reply. 
    Typical.   I'd still rather have a Series win followed by a decade of
    mediocrity, then have 5 years of almosts.
    
    And I've also noticed that Roger has never really lost a game.  The ump
    has squeezed him, the batters haven't produced, or the bullpen hasn't
    held a lead.  Good thing he's not in the NL, where he would be yanked
    for a pinch hitter and end up with more no decisions...
    
    JD
29.640RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOIs Paris Burning?Mon Sep 30 1991 19:0318
    And just to clarify the Roger greatness over the last 5 years.
    
    If I needed a season - I'd pick Roger.  He's been pretty consistent,
    and fairly injury free.
    
    If I needed a guy to either win a playoff or a World Series, and could
    choose, I'd pick, before the Rocket man:
    
    1988 Orel Hershiser
    1990 Jose Rijo
    1987 Frank Viola
    1986 Bruce Hurst and Mike Scott
    
    
    Roger wouldn't get the call.  Those guys became virtually unhittable. 
    They rose to the occasion.
    
    JD
29.641with all due respect, of courseHAVASU::HEISERbriefing for the ascentMon Sep 30 1991 19:105
    Re: single performers vs. team winners
    
    I think BoSox fans do that because that's all they have.  Cheap
    compensation, but its something.
    
29.642As objectively as I can state it, perceptions asideNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 30 1991 19:1523
    Keep it up, JD, and Clemens will someday join the ranks of Namath,
    Lemieux, and Jordan in your personal pantheon of athletes who "couldn't 
    win the big one".  And we'll both be the happier for it, too, I'm
    sure...  ;-)
    
    No, I have no illusions about this version of the Red Sox.  They were
    not overachievers.  For every game they won when they were beset by
    injuries and the chips were down, they handed one away earlier in the
    season when there were absolutely no excuses.  They're still only going
    to win about 85 games, which is pretty pathetic considering even
    reasonable pre-season expectations.
    
    But, I cannot realistically see what this has to do with Clemens. 
    Forget his personal stats or whether or not he'll win 20; I really
    could care less about that either.  The Sox are 23-10 in games he
    started (best *team* record in the league behind an individual starting
    pitcher), 59-62 in all other games.  That's the bottom line.  Guess
    what: Roger Clemens ain't the problem with the Red Sox; nor does he in
    any way symbolize what is or has ever been wrong with them.
    
    glenn
     
29.643RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOIs Paris Burning?Mon Sep 30 1991 19:2515
    Glenn -
    
    Hey, like I said, I'd take Clemens in a second. Pencil in 20 wins.
    Then go from there.
    
    I have no real problems with him.  Though I do see Clemens 'fans'
    acting like Jordan, LeMeiux and Bird fans ;-)
    
    Perhaps I have my own version of the KOD.
    
    Yeah, lets see "Jeff Hostetler can't win"
    
    Now, let's see what happens  ;-)
    
    JD
29.644STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Mon Sep 30 1991 19:4017
    > I'd take Clemens in a second. Pencil in 20 wins.
    > Then go from there.
    
    So would I.  Problem with this team is, there's no #2 starter whom you
    can then pencil in for 15-18, or a #3 who can be counted on for 13-15,
    and so on.   Contrast that with the Sox teams of the late 80s, who had
    Hurst, Boyd for a couple years, and Boddicker to fill those roles.
    
    
    re a few back on Calvin Schiraldi:
    
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think Sachiraldi got cut by San Diego
    early this year, had a brief stint with Texas, and then the Rangers cut
    him.  Don't know if he's still in baseball.                
    
    
    py
29.645JUPITR::PARTEECharlie -- Lemieux est le mieuxMon Sep 30 1991 20:0314
>RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Is Paris Burning?"                28 lines  30-SEP-1991 16:59
>    Dodgers to the Series win on his back.  And that's something truley
>    great athletes can do.  Roger Clemens has not done that.  Ever.  
    
    But Mario has, right, JD?
    
    :-)
    
    Charlie
    
    (yeah, I know, notes before this one made the same point.  But I wanted
    to say it, too!)
    
    
29.646RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOIs Paris Burning?Mon Sep 30 1991 20:2722
    Charlie,
    
    Mario didn't carry anyone on his back.  Penguins were lucky that the
    Stars got hot and beat the best teams.  Best thing that happened to the
    Pens last year was Mario's injury.  They turned into a real team when
    they realized they could win and play good hockey without Mr. Ego
    skating around.  
    
    Back to baseball:
    
    Paul Y. - agree 100%.  But the Sox let the pitching go.   And they
    won't deal a Greenwell or a Burks for a top notch pitcher.  Nor will 
    they pay big bucks for a real free agent gem.
    
    Yeah, Darwin and Young were tries.  But would the Sox go for a guy like
    Viola.  Nope.  Not in my lifetime.
    
    They made the run.  Satisfied the fans - competitive, exciting, etc.
    The management will do nothing but raise ticket prices and talk about
    the shoulda's and coulda's.  And the ride will start again next year.
    
    JD
29.647I don't know why I bother but ...FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Oct 01 1991 10:3412
    Mike, if you accept that it's OK for Larry to benefit from officiating
    then you must accept that it's equally OK for Roger to benefit from the
    same and then it can't be part of your anti-Clemens analysis. 
    Conversely, if it isn't OK for Roger to benefit then it's not OK for
    Larry to benefit and you must equally downgrade Bird's achievements for
    the same reason.
    
    Or why not just be completely honest and admit that you don't like
    Clemens and won't give him credit for anything he does because you
    don't like him?  That's really what it's all about, isn't it?
    
    John
29.648I haven't got time for the painCTHQ3::LEARYTue Oct 01 1991 11:1625
    JD,
    I'm not speaking for other Sox fans, but I'm certainly not satisfied
    or content. Sure the Sox have been competetive since '67 but what have
    they won. ZIP. I won't be satisfied until they win at least one. Then we
    can start talking about remaining competetive,blah, blah, blah. Also
    I could give a flying you-know-what for individual stats ( like Boggs'
    batting titles or Clemens' Cy Young awards), give me a CHAMPEENSHIP.
    Not denigrating individual achievement but they pale so much in
    comparison to the big enchilada. On to next year Sox' fans. They'll
    probably break my heart, but I'll root for them and criticize 'em just
    the same.
    
    On another vein, JD, your remark about Hostetler got me thinking about
    my ex-favorite team, the Jints. You know I used to be a die-hard Jints
    fans until the late 60's. Then I met my first New Yawker. See you
    later, sayonnara Jints.  8^)
    
    Glenn,
    Didya have to go and mention Schiraldi and the '86 series? Anguished
    flashback. I have a tremendous headache! Back to therapy. I swore in
    '86 if I ever met Schiraldi,Gedman, Buckner, or Mac in person I'd
    walk up and say. "Thanks for '86, assh*le", and then duck.
    
    MikeL
    
29.649NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 01 1991 11:2322
        
    John, I wouldn't even waste my time in accepting Mike's premise (that
    Clemens benefits from an enlarged strike zone).  I personally haven't
    seen it.  I sit in dead centerfield almost thirty games a season and
    have groaned over just as many Clemens' near-strikes that weren't
    called as times I've acknowledged the Sox caught the breaks.  If it 
    even exists, this "star treatment" is nowhere near as prevalent in MLB 
    as it is in the NBA.  At least in baseball, in the overwhelming 
    majority of cases you've got to get the job done on your own merits.  
    If someone takes your fastball out of the park, there's no
    stripe-shirted geek to come rushing in, whistles ablazin', claiming
    there was contact on the play and nullifying the dinger to the delight 
    of the home crowd.
    
    Mike has tipped his hand again with this ridiculous "power pitcher" 
    thing, too.  The surest formula for longterm, consistent pitching 
    success in the history of baseball is to be a power pitcher.  There 
    are exceptions (like Warren Spahn), but most of the all-time greats
    (Koufax, Gibson, Johnson, Feller) didn't throw no lollipops either...
    
    glenn
      
29.650AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHTue Oct 01 1991 11:328
	JD, wasn't it you who said before the season that this Sox team was 
a juggernaut and trashed on any Sox fan who pointed out weaknesses?  Now 
you are admitting that the pitching after Roger is mediocre at best.  
Sounds like a contradiction to me.  I said way back in April that pitching 
and defense were lacking on this team and that's still going to be the 
problem entering next season unless something is done.

				/Don
29.651CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 01 1991 12:085
    FWIW, Gorman has said he will be looking for pitching and speed this
    winter.  Greenwell and Burkes are available for the right deal.
    
    C'mon Sox and Jays.  Quit teasing us.  Just put us out of our misery,
    will ya?
29.652CAM::WAYThank you, Thank you, Sam I amTue Oct 01 1991 12:1734
>    FWIW, Gorman has said he will be looking for pitching and speed this
>    winter.  Greenwell and Burkes are available for the right deal.
>    
>    C'mon Sox and Jays.  Quit teasing us.  Just put us out of our misery,
>    will ya?

Same old same old.

Hell, I'm probably as fast as most of the Red Sox.  And Mac, you've
seen first hand how slow the Chainsaw is.  I mean, I coulnd't beat
a man carrying a stove in a race to first base.


The Red Sox are always saying they need speed.  What they need are
some new owners and a GM who are committed to getting and developing
talent for a contender.

The Red Sox will say they need speed, yet their entire ball game is
geared towards making it up in one fell swoop.  Why else have the
Strikeout-in-the-cluth-King Jack Clark on the roster?

Pitching?  Oh yeah, the Red Sox have had some GREAT pitching over the
years.  In fact, the Sox should win an award for best developmental
squad in the majors.  The pitchers the Sox have thrown away who
then excelled are far numerous to list here....


Yup, they're looking for pitching and speed.  Only problem is that like
every year the pitching and speed they get are sub-par....

8^)

'Saw

29.653my final words on his highness...CNTROL::CHILDSthatelectricprescription4urFunkyIllsTue Oct 01 1991 12:4210
 John, yes I do think it distracts from Larry's greatness. Just like Magic
 and Jordan taking 45 steps before dribbling. It's the reason why I've turned
 into a college basketball fan more than a pro fan.

 you're correct though I don't like Roger and I will never give him credit for
 anything he does. Why??

 Because the man is bleeding crybaby. Every time he looses a ballgame there's
 an excuse....
29.654RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Walk in the SunTue Oct 01 1991 12:5230
    re Roger Clemens
    
    I get a howl whenever I hear Sox/Roger fans whine about poor ol' Roger
    getting squeezed.  ANother reason I RON the SOX conference.  Comic
    relief.
    
    re /Don
    
    Yep, I thought Darwin and Young would help the team.  I thought Darwin
    was good for about 16 wins.  His injury really hurt them.  I felt this
    was the SOX year, and anything short of a champeenship would be a case
    of underachievement.  And that's how I feel.
    
    ANd now we have good ol' Lou saying 'for the right price' Burks and/or
    Greenwell are available.  We've heard that before.  We know what the
    Right price.  Heck, California could offer Finley and another player,
    for Greenweel, and Gorman would say "Nope, we want Finley, Abbott and
    Harvey"  The Angels laugh - and then Gorman says "They backed out..."
    
    Same ol same ol.  What will the SOx do with SPEED?  Heck, where would
    the Sox put someone with speed?
    
    I think they should sign Mariano Duncan for SS.  And get a real leadoff
    type speedster for the OF.
    
    I'll believe it when I see it...
    
    Gorman won't take a risk.
    
    JD
29.655Burks fow what? another CF?CTHQ3::LEARYTue Oct 01 1991 13:178
    Educate me guys,
    Greenwell as trade bait I can see. Plantier can step in. But if you're
    offerin' Burks, you better package that deal with a centerfielder in
    return. I don't think you'd want Housie or Lyons full-time in that
    position. Anybody else in their system that could step in? Doubt it.
    
    MikeL
    
29.656FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Oct 01 1991 13:284
    Bob Zupcic could play CF at least defensively.  Don't know how good his
    offense is.
    
    John
29.657Believe it or not, most of us are in violent agreementNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 01 1991 13:2925
                              
    Here we go again.  As the Red Sox are generally being villified here 
    in Boston for the collapse of this past week, JD has propped up his
    imaginary Mr. Typical Red Sox Fan strawman, the one who is still
    supposedly insisting that the Sox were mighty overachievers on the
    whole (at least in between his whines over Roger getting squeezed--
    how the heck did that issue get turned around from Mike's complaints to
    the opposite?), and is thrashing the living stuffing out of it.  Even 
    though the naysayers like Mr. Brake were right on the money (these 
    naysayers somehow being the same blind fans who see nothing wrong with 
    the Sox and who are major contributors to the problem; you figure that 
    one out) and he was wrong, it's poor Mr. Typical Red Sox Fan who must 
    pay the price.  Yes, all is well and good in SPORTS... ;-) ;-)
    
    All kidding aside, JD, believe me, there is no celebrating the Sox' limited
    "success" going on down in Kenmore Square as we speak.  Barely one week 
    ago I witnessed the most savage booing seen in these parts in some
    years, levied at Mr. Matt Young and his manager as they departed the 
    field with the hopes for first place slipping away.  The frustration you
    feel is the same as *most* feel towards Sox' management and personnel,
    the occasional individual you single out is most decidedly in the
    minority...
    
    glenn
     
29.658STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Tue Oct 01 1991 13:367
    The Sox did not "overachieve".  They did not "underachieve".  They'll
    most likely end up exactly where this noter and most objective/national
    observers (as opposed to the Boston yahoos proclaiming this is *THE*
    year back in March) thought they'd be, second behind Toronto.
                                                          
    
    py
29.659RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOA Walk in the SunTue Oct 01 1991 13:4029
    Glenn -
    
    I guess since I get most of my news from the SOX file, I feel that
    folks are in the 'overachieving' mode again.  Yeah, there is some
    criticism.  But I find the tone in their to always be one of "I'd
    rather be competitive than anything else.."
    
    And I guess some comments I read in there stick in my mind, especially
    ones voiced by some of the 'chosen few' in that file...
    
    As you know, my other favorite team is the Mets.  And boy, did they
    do some underachieving in the 80's. But they brought home a
    champeenship, and that's a goodness (unfortunately, they did it against
    the Sox).
    
    And I do consider the Mets as winning that series, and not the Sox
    blowing it or losing it.  The Mets were down 0-2 and heading TO Fenway,
    but they showed their heart and guys to come back.   And with one
    strike to go, they did a gut check and got back into it.  Yep, the
    passed ball by Gedman and the Buckner error helped, but it was only
    sheer determination by the Mets that made those things possible.
    
    I want to see the Sox gamble with a trade.  I don't care about
    finishing over .500, or being able to belittle Cleveland or Seattle
    fans.   I want a World Series.  Anything else is a failure at this
    point.  Yep, I'm still a fan.  Always have been, always will be.  
    but I've had enough.  
    
    JD
29.660How about Eric Davis?NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 01 1991 13:4121
    
    There is no one ready in the Sox' system to take over in centerfield,
    including Housie and Zupcic (who hasn't hit well in the minors and 
    probably never will).  One interesting thought I had was to make an
    attempt to get ahold of Eric Davis, who has had major problems in 
    Cincinnati and who they'll almost certainly be trying to move at less 
    than dollar value.  It's a risk, because he's been terminally injured, 
    but when he's been able to play in the past he's been the kind of 
    immense talent that Burks will probably never be, and Davis is still
    only 29 years old.  Who knows, it might not even take Burks to get
    him, and it'd be interesting to see how he'd hold up away from 
    Riverfront's turf and on Fenway's soft lawn (Burks hasn't held up even
    then...).
    
    I know, I know, all standard disclaimers about the Sox actually making
    an effort to obtain a disgruntled black player inserted; it's just a 
    thought.
    
    glenn
    
     
29.661CAM::WAYThank you, Thank you, Sam I amTue Oct 01 1991 13:5030
There is something almost Wagnerian in the the constant struggle
of the Boston Red Sox, and their fans.

I mean, change the protagonists, change the setting, and you're
reading a novel by Herman Hesse, chock full of angst and seeming
futile efforts.

And JD, in relating this to what you just said in the Sports Quote
note, I'd be willing to bet a lot of money (let's say as much
as the stupid State of Connecticut is now starting to steal from
my pay each week) that when (if) the Red Sox ever win the series,
that the actual winning will be anticlimactic as compared to the
angst suffered by the faithful over the years.

What was it Lucifer said?  Better to rule in Hell than serve in 
Heaven?

See, if the Red Sox win a series, then the raison d'etre of the
average Sox fan goes right out the window.  The Sox fan's major
reason for his/her fanaticism is the slow August fade, occasionally
punctuated by a late September teasing surge.

Take that away from them, and they have nothing.

And I'd bet that in the subconscious of every Sox fan, they wouldn't
trade the sublime suffering they go through for any hollow
Series victory.....


'Saw
29.662AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHTue Oct 01 1991 13:537
	I'm not sure that Plantier won't turn into a Kevin Mass.  After all 
he hasn't played a full season yet.  Now with Greenwell you're pretty sure 
what you'll get.  Between a .280 - .300 batting average, 80-100 RBI's, 
15-20 HR's, 10-15 fielding boners, 5-10 baserunning blunders and 2-5 fights 
with minority members of the team.

				/Don
29.663sick of excellent lossesCTHQ3::LEARYTue Oct 01 1991 14:4512
    Ha! Good one /Don,
    With a Haircut from Hell to match.
    
    Sigmund 'Saw 8^)
    NO,NO,NO. I want a CHAMPEENSHIP. I don't want angst, I want one, then
    two, three,etc. champeensh. ( do i sound like a 2 yr old or what ).
    
    And, on Wednesday eve. if Toronto clinches, I'll be a-booin' from the
    bleachers ( logical or not !)
    
    MikeL
    
29.664IAMOK::WASKOMTue Oct 01 1991 20:0917
    I sometimes wonder if being a Red Sox fan isn't more angst than being a
    Cubs fan.  At least with the Cubs I don't *expect* them to do well. 
    Several years ago, when they made a serious run, I just knew that it
    wouldn't happen.  The only issue was when they would die.  Now they're
    back to their normal mediocrity - which is just fine, thank you very
    much.  Go out to the game, enjoy the sunshine and peanuts and Cracker
    Jack, and go home.  Simple.
    
    With the Sox, you keep hoping that they'll finally get that one small
    step better.  They're constantly the bridesmaid, never the bride. 
    (Cubs are lucky if they're even in the church!)  They've made it to the
    "Big Dance" within the living memory of most of their fans.  And then
    they find ways to *throw the game(s) away*.
    
    Brutal.
    
    A&W
29.665CAM::WAYThank you, Thank you, Sam I amTue Oct 01 1991 22:2811
I think that part of it is how many times the Sox have come close.

I don't remember the Cubs being around all that much.  The Red
Sox will never come closer than they did in '86.

While JD is right, the Met came back from a 2-0 deficit, the 
Sox threw it away with guys like Schiraldi, Gedman, and Stanley.

Names that will live in infamy.....

'Saw
29.666Clemens Haters take HeartFSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Oct 01 1991 23:066
    Roger has given 2 homers and the game is in the 5th.  Tigers lead 3-0,
    Jays are winning, doesn't look like Roger will win 20, looks like
    tomorrow night could see the final elimination.  Won't that be ironic
    on Fan Appreciation/Noters Night?
    
    John
29.667Spread on the jam....CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Wed Oct 02 1991 09:4613
I thought fer sure that Childs' would get reply #666. 8^))))

Mr. "Clutch" Clemens does it again. I wouldn't have felt so bad if
it had been Tettleton and Fielder who hit shots, but Bergman and 
Incaligula??? Gawd it was depressing. Maybe the can manage to eek 
out a win tonight.


Thank God it's hockey season!


Steve
29.668CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodWed Oct 02 1991 10:2323
No, no. 

This fits in perfectly with the script.

The Red Sox "Siegfried", their ultimate warrior finally folds late
in the battle.

The stage is set for the lush strains of the Gotterdammerung to 
rise over Fenway Park (The Hall of the Gods) this evening.

You will be witness to one of the finest spectacles since the
late 1800's performances of the Ring Cycle at Beyreuth......


Sit back, and enjoy.  Let the gestalt of the utter angst wash over
you.

You are Red Sox fans.  You're smart, you're witty, and doggone it,
you *like* it.....



'Saw
29.669They'd better appreciate us!CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 02 1991 11:452
    Yeah, thanks alot John.  Get us tickets to the game during which the
    Sox are eliminated from the Pennant Race. ;^)
29.670FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Oct 02 1991 11:488
    Well, at least we'll have fun talking cynically about the Olde Town
    Team.  We'll at least get a free calendar.  One of us may even have a
    chance to win a car.
    
    For a long time, we were looking at this game as being completely
    meaningless, and now it's only partially meaningless.  :-)
    
    John
29.671CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodWed Oct 02 1991 11:5939
Look on the bright side!

How many people can go to a baseball game and get some culture at the
same time.


Think of the WONDER of it all.  There you will be, sitting in Fenway
Park, the noble, all but out of it Red Sox struggling away, fighting
the good fight, striving despite the fact that all around them is
the carnage of a season gone bad.

When, out in the Centerfield bleachers, a large, heavy woman, in
armored breast plate, and a Viking hat with horns on it, and long
blonde braids, will rise.  She'll breath deep of the cool October
air, and one clear ringing note will be heard across the land the
Pilgrims settled.

Suddenly, a hush will fill the stadium while the note pierces the
stillness.

Fans will share a private moment with their thoughts, thinking perhaps,
back to the days of early April.  Some of you may remember the losing
marathon in the cool rainy dampness of Patriots day.  Others may
remember a hot July afternoon.

Then, swiftly as it came, the note will die out.  But in it's short
lifetime it will have changed the complexion of a season.  For the
remaining innings of the remaining games will be to baseball what
a lame duck is to politics....simply marking time till things close
up for the winter.

The Fat Lady will have sung, and you will have been there behold
it.....


Not many people get a chance like that in life.....


'Saw
29.672MEIS::SIKESWed Oct 02 1991 12:2941
Re: .640

>    If I needed a guy to either win a playoff or a World Series, and could
>    choose, I'd pick, before the Rocket man:
>    
>    1988 Orel Hershiser
>    1990 Jose Rijo
>    1987 Frank Viola
>    1986 Bruce Hurst and Mike Scott
>    
>    
>    Roger wouldn't get the call.  Those guys became virtually unhittable. 
>    They rose to the occasion.

 I'd agree with the '88 Hershiser, and the '86 Scott, but the '87 Viola? Not 
exactly unhittable. 

1987 Frank Viola      G   W  L   Pct.   IP     H   R  ER  BB   Ks  ERA
 champ series         2   1  0  1.000   12    14   8   7   5    9  5.25
 World Series         3   2  1   .667   19.1  17   8   8   3   16  3.72

1988 Orel Hershiser   G   W  L   Pct.   IP     H   R  ER  BB   Ks  ERA
 champ series         4   1  0  1.000   24.2  18   5   3   7   15  1.09
 World Series         2   1  0  1.000   18     7   2   2   6   17  1.00

1990 Jose Rijo        G   W  L   Pct.   IP     H   R  ER  BB   Ks  ERA
 champ series         2   1  0  1.000   12.1  10   6   6   7   15  4.38
 World Series         2   2  0  1.000   15.1   9   1   1   5   14  0.59

1986 Bruce Hurst      G   W  L   Pct.   IP     H   R  ER  BB   Ks  ERA
 champ series         2   1  0  1.000   15    18   5   4   1    8  2.40
 World Series         3   2  0  1.000   23    18   5   5   6   18  1.96

1986 Mike Scott       G   W  L   Pct.   IP     H   R  ER  BB   Ks  ERA
 champ series         2   2  0  1.000   18     8   1   1   1   19  0.50

1986 Calvin Schiraldi G   W  L   Pct.   IP     H   R  ER  BB   Ks  ERA
 champ series         4   0  1   .000    6     5   2   1   3    9  1.50
 World Series         3   0  2   .000    4     7   7   6   3    2 13.50

Bob
29.673CELTIK::JACOBYou Trying to make ME sick????Wed Oct 02 1991 12:3014
    
    >>						One of us may even have a
    >>chance to win a car.                        
    
    
    With the way the last 2 weeks or so have gone for the Sox, what're they
    giving away,
    
    AN EDSEL???????????????????????????/
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
29.674My car: a metaphor for Sox' season...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1991 13:1625
    That homer Incaviglia hit last night was a titanic blast!  Maybe the
    longest ball Clemens has ever given up.  I'll be the first to admit he
    just didn't have it.  Only the third game all season he's given up five
    or more earned runs (Texas, Toronto, now Detroit), though.
    
    Just to give you an idea of what the attitude at Fenway is already like
    at this point in the season, another guy from work and I went down
    there last night and bought somebody's return tickets, three rows
    behind home plate.  It's over, and the regulars are obviously fleeing
    the ship like rats.  We were sitting right behind ESPN's radar gun guy.  
    The highest I saw Roger register was 93, Tanana 83.  Tanana bottomed out 
    with a 50 mph lollipop that froze Wade Boggs in his tracks.  Bergman's
    homer came off a 90-mph straight fastball; Inky turned on a 92-mpher (I
    missed Fryman's homer).
    
    Fairly rotten evening given expectations for a Clemens' start.  I also 
    managed to damage a tire on one of Boston's infamous bleepin' back 
    street potholes and the thing blew up on the way home (I was having new 
    tires put on today anyway, but ain't it great how things just happen to
    work out like that!).  Not fun.  But not to worry, I'll be back for more 
    abuse tonight... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.675The End Is near...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOFrom Here To EternityWed Oct 02 1991 13:1795
    STAGE:   Somewhere on the Mass Turnpike.   A long, king-of-the-road,
    touring bus, with tinted windows, and gothic paintings on the side
    hurtles down the freeway - flashing its lights at any import or
    domestic that dares to get in its way.  It blares its horn at trucks,
    which obediently get out of the way.  State troopes look the other way,
    knowing that they can do nothing to stop this rambling vehicle.
    
    It cruises past Sturbridge and Westborough - causing folks to feel a
    strange coolness sweep their body.  Those foolhearty to stare at the
    riveted behemoth get a glimpse of the destination sign:
    
         "EXPRESS:  FENWAY PARK"
    
    It rampages steadily, always heading east.  And folks in towns it
    hurtles by swear they hear orchestral strains and the sounds of a diva
    warming up "LA LA LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LAAAAAAAAA"
    
    The crescendo gets louder the close to Landsdowne street it gets.  At
    the Natick tollbooths, the bus flashes its lights, blares its horns,
    and the booth collector only gets a glimpse of the driver.  He looks
    vaguely familiar, a rotund man, with 'Babe' stitched across his breast
    pocket.   A faded poster for the opening of "No No Nanette" can barely
    be seen through the windows.
    
    Inside the bus, a fever pitch is developing.  The star is still warming
    up - exercising her sizeable lungs.  Her manager, Bucky, jokes with
    Enos, the wardrobe man, and Bill, the accountant.  "Love Beantown,"
    Bucky guffaws..."It's the one steady gig this chic has - nothing after
    this til we hit Madison Square in May! Haw!" 
    "LALALALALALAAAAALADEEDAAAAAAA!!!!!!!" the lady bellows.
    
    The bus rolls through the outlying 'burbs of Boston - like a metal
    apolyptic horseman.  Grandfathers suddenly sit straight up and say
    "Throw the Ball!  THrow the Ball!  He can't score from FIRST!!!"
    Their sons and daughters scream "Get up Luis, GET UP!"   Their sons and
    daughers cry "Jim WIlloughby!"  and thier children spit up and wet
    their beds, chanting 'Buckner, Buckner, Buckner'
    
    A shrill laughter fills the night, as the bus of doom slams into
    Beantown.  In her mansion, the owner feels the prescense of her
    husband, his mournful cries startling her - she glances at the calander
    - OCTOBER - it sneers back at her.  "She's back again, Tom" the old
    lady trembles...
    
    In Kenmore Square, everything moves at a slower speed.  A dark cloud
    obscures the stars.  No animals move, rats and pigeons holed up until
    the inevitable passes.   The faithful file in, feeling strangely
    germanic and lethargic.  In the clubhouse, the Ol' Towne Team wears a
    collective grimace.  
    
    The Bus hurtles down Beacon Street, the noise too much for people to
    take.  The lady keeps warming up, the bus driver blares his horn.  The
    road crew opens the windows to laugh at the cowering masses "Poor
    schmucks" Bucky roars.....A chant that sounds like "Eupheus, Eupheus"
    can be heard....a cruel mocking chant.  
    
    Those with strong stomachs see the vanity license plate "1918" 
    A block from the destination, Babe starts laughing - hey guys - those
    spirits are going to try to stop us again - "Won't those poor souls
    EVER learn!!!"  A ghostly collection of ex-Sox and fans form a human
    chain, trying to stop the bus - but they freeze when they see the 
    name of the bus, emblazoned in Yankee Blue "Frazee"
    
    The bus rolls right over a sausage vendor.  The doors open.  The
    entourage gets out, slowly rolling a red carpet, which fits right
    through the legs of Bill.  The star slowly steps down, with
    a Toronto batting helmet on, a Genuine Bill Buckner autographed glove,
    Enos Slaughter's spikes, and a variety of other articles of clothing.
    
    Inside the park, the announcer asks everyone "To Please Stand...."
    But just as the strains of the National Anthem are about to start, a
    huge booming of drums cuts it off.  The lights in the stadium dim.  A 
    spotlight hits the top of the Green Monster, and 36,000 souls gasp -
    the
    FAT LADY has arrived....She belts out one last LALALALAAAAALADEEEDA...
    The glass protecting the 600 Club cracks.....
    
      And to the tune of the "Hallejuh Chorus", she belts out this year's 
      rendition ....
    
    
      "OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER, FORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOX
       OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER,
    WAITTILNEXTYEARWAITTILNEXTYEARWAAAIIITTTTIL NEXT YEAR..."
    
    From Bar Harbour to WInter Haven, Provincetown to Barrington, the faded
    hats with the "B" are placed away for another winter.  When the Fat
    Lady finishes singing, a small fire starts burning in the heart of the
    faithful.  The fire of eternal hope, mixed with the embers of
    despair...another ride on the Red Sox Ferris Wheel has lurched to a
    stop...and once again, the Sox fan is stuck near the top.  The only
    solance one can take is to peer down at the seats stuck just below -
    the one's with those two guys from Chicago....
    
    JD
29.676CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodWed Oct 02 1991 13:226
Chilling JD, absolutely chilling.

Polish that one up and submit it to USA Today or something!


'Saw
29.677MCIS1::DHAMELToday is a good day to dieWed Oct 02 1991 13:385
    
    Helluva note there, JD!
    
    Dickstah
    
29.678CSLALL::TIMMONSWhat happened to Walt's What happened? Wed Oct 02 1991 13:494
    Great job, JD!  I don't know how, but you managed to get all of the
    ghosts in there.  Tooooo funny!!  :*)
    
    Lee
29.679There was something to cheer about last nightCHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 02 1991 14:362
    Last night Wade Boggs became one of the few players in ML history to
    record 40+ doubles in 8 seasons.
29.680Don't want the glas from the 600 club to fall on meTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPWed Oct 02 1991 16:503
RE: JD's note

Now we'll all be looking over our shoulder for a bus tonight!!
29.681EARRTH::BROOKSKickin this note into the effect mode...Thu Oct 03 1991 01:1929
    re Eric The Red (Sox ?)
    
    Excuse me, but where would they play him ?
    
    :-(
    
    Anyhow, Davis is almost certainly a Dodger, and I predict that 100+
    games on grass will do for him what it did for Andre Dawson, and he's
    younger than The Hawk.
    
    re Big Game Pitchers
    
    The 1986 Mike Scott was even more untouchable than Orel H. The Mets in
    general, and Gary Carter in particular, were *terrified* to see him in
    a 7th game. The 88 Hershier was right up there too, so was the 1983 (?)
    Saberhagen.
    
    But why did y'all forget the 1989 Dave Stewart ? Sheesh ....
    
    random stuff,
    
    The Sox need to go after Ozzie Smith. He's still the best, and he might
    lose some hits on grass, but he'd take even more hits away on D. Plus
    he provides leadership and some speed. In addition, I'd trade
    Greenwell, move Burks to left, trade Brunasky (if possible), load up on
    the pitching, and if you can't sign Eric Davis, go the hell for
    Bonilla, Tartabull, or (best of all) Roberto Kelly.
    
    Doc 
29.682EARRTH::BROOKSKickin this note into the effect mode...Thu Oct 03 1991 01:215
    re .675
    
    Unbelieveable. 
    
    You ghostwriting for Stephen King ? (Pun intended)
29.683CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodThu Oct 03 1991 09:497
Well, for those of you who were there, I hope that the Fat Lady
sang REALLY well.

I mean, as long as she's gonna sing, you want your money's worth, right?


'Saw
29.684A rather enjoyable evening!CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Thu Oct 03 1991 09:598
She was singin' real good until she was pelted to death by 
"Fan Appreciation" calander paper airplanes!!!!!!!




Steve
29.685CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodThu Oct 03 1991 10:1817
Well, now that the season is, for all intents and purposes, over,
I thought we could hand out some awards to the Red Sox players.


The first one that comes to mind, especially from THIS rugby player,
is the 

		BEST TACKLE of the YEAR

and it goes to 

		John Marzano 

for pulling down that guy before he got to Rocket Roger...


'Saw
29.686Not one beachball was snared by NinjCTHQ2::LEARYThu Oct 03 1991 11:118
    Best singing of lasted night was Kev 8^)
    
    Hey Kev, how many times didya call Mac a fascist?!!
    8^)
    
    Great evening!
    MikeL
    
29.687"Dewey, Suemm and Howe" are on retainer!!!!!CST17::FARLEYThe Man with 1,000 ID'sThu Oct 03 1991 11:4520
    MikeL,
    
    Not Once did I direct such a slur at dear ol' Mac!  They were ALL
    
    directed at the "Youth Police" who were rounding up those pool
    
    beach-ball wackers!  I mean, they paid GOOD MONEY ('bout $6 bucks
    
    right?) to enjoin in a little exercise with the cheap seat crowd
    
    and WHAM!!!! all of a sudden they get ejected!!!!
    
    Again, I repeat, I deny your accusation and intend to contact a
    
    lawyer about you slandering my good name!
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev_?
    
29.688Hey ! Lamp! Gettouttahere!CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Thu Oct 03 1991 12:0812
Wait a minute there Kev, I HEARD you call Mac a fascist, and am 
willing to testify on behalf of Mr. Leary, just as long as he
countersues and gives me half! I thought the EEEEEEEEE! EEEEEEEEE!
imitation by Kevin was quite good. It's just too bad 'Saw wasn't
there to see it, definitely wet pants material! The best singing
of the night tho' went to Dickstah and the SO, signing thier rendition
of famous sitcom jingles! They actually got a few people in the
row in front of them to join in, and were taking requests! 8^)


Steve
29.689CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodThu Oct 03 1991 12:2211
But see, unless Walt, Hawk, Mike or I were there, no DD impression
could be even close.

Not that Kev couldn't do it (in fact, has anyone ever seen Kev and
the DD together?????)

but, well, there's only ONE DD......


8^)
'Saw
29.690STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Thu Oct 03 1991 12:2910
    re Doc's random stuff in .681:
    
    I heard/read that the Cards are going to resign Ozzie for '92.  Given
    that he's one of few veterans around what's basically a young
    rebuilding team, probably not a bad a idea.
    
    NO WAY would the Yankees deal Roberto Kelly to Boston.  
    
    
    py
29.691REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Beth Howland?Thu Oct 03 1991 12:3213
    I was there 'Saw... it wasn't bad considering they didn't see the
    original.  Kevin had:
    
    1) A lot more teeth
    2) No number 1 hand 
    3) Too much of a likeness to Allison Yankowskas  (ha ha)...
    4) Nobody down the row in dockers, sipping wine and eating from a
    yuppie tablecloth...
    
    Although he did babble on and on the whole night... and occasionally
    had the look of befuddlement like when the guys behind you left. 
    Definitely needed work.  Ways to go before Kwak calls him a geek(ha ha)...
    
29.692Walt was there, I'm SURE he'll come to my defense! ?CST17::FARLEYThe Man with 1,000 ID'sThu Oct 03 1991 12:4531
    Oh yeah, I knew there was something I forgot to mention,
    
    I was also directing my [alleged] comments at the umpires too!
    
    Like I said before, I'm innocent of all charges and I'm feeling
    
    like a victim of circumstantial illogical conclusions!  In fact,
    
    I belive Mac is one of the most even handed, fair and impartial,
    
    un-opinionated moderators ever to walk the planet!!!!!!  ;^)
    
    Besides, hearing someone who MAY sound like me is inconclusive
    
    proof that *I* actually said what ya'all said I said to a specific
    
    individual and I'm truely hurt at this attempt to slander my name
    
    and tarnish my reputation as a mild mannered, well behaved, quiet
    
    kind o' guy!!!!!
    
    (based on the way y'all are jumping on the vigilante bandwagon, anybody
    
    know if a certain wheelchair bound attorney is available????)
    
    Who_is_this_guy_called_Kev_anyhow???????
    
    ;^>
    
    
29.693CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodThu Oct 03 1991 12:491
Kevin Farley....the MrT of Tigermania!
29.694AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoc Flutie?Thu Oct 03 1991 12:494
    	Hey Kev you seen my license?  Taking up on Saw's theme I think
    the best solar panel on the team belongs to (Door)Matt Young.
    
    				/Don
29.695HarmlessAXIS::CHAPPELCurly Q. LinkThu Oct 03 1991 12:599
29.696CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodThu Oct 03 1991 13:329
Look at it THIS way fans:


	It's only 143 days until the start of Spring Training,
	the point at which the Red Sox will no longer be
	mathematically eliminated any more.....


'Saw
29.697Hey, I cain't find me license, You got it Kev?CTHQ2::LEARYThu Oct 03 1991 13:4325
    Flintstones, we're the Flintstones
    and
    Car 54 where are you!
    
    The Addams Family
    
    A Horse is a Horse
    
    Let me tell ya a story 'bout a main named Jed.
    
    Yep, Dickstah and the SO had 'em rolling. Loved his Three Stooges
    suspendahs.
    
    Hey Kev, The accusation stands!  We also know you directed your
    "fascist" comments to the Haid-Crackin' Militia but under yo' breath
    we hoid you mutter " You too, Mac" 
    Here's an "Eeeee, Eeeeee" to you! 8^)
    Thank you Monsieur Diggins for your corroboration. 
    
    OK, Glenn amd Bob, recite back the '84 Tigers champeenship starting 
    lineup!! 8^)
    
    MikeL
     
    
29.698Not that it'll ever happen but ...SHALOT::HUNTTed, that's the prom queen !!!Thu Oct 03 1991 13:4724
 When will the Sox ever learn ???    If they would just *TRY* to build a
 team with superb up-the-middle defensive skills, they might just do it.
 
 They need a great defensive catcher, an Ozzie Smith clone at shortstop, a
 superb second baseman and a quicksilver center fielder who'll flag down
 just about everything in between both foul lines.   Then add a couple more
 fireballers and a junkballer or two and let the other team beat ground
 balls up the middle all day long.
 
 2-1 wins count just the same as 8-7 wins.    They don't need Mike
 Greenwell, Jack Clark, or Tom Brunansky.    They need guys like Sandy
 Alomar, Walt Weiss, Billy Ripken, and Devon White or suitable equivalents.
 
 Keep Phil Plantier.  He's a hard-nosed scrapper.   Mo Vaughn has Sam Horn
 written all over him although he looks a little better in the clutch than
 Horn.   Wade Boggs I could care less about.   Yeah, sure, he hits .330 but
 he still spells the word "team" with all "I"'s.   Send him packing and
 pick up or develop a Terry Pendleton clone.
 
 The Sox need to clean the house from top to bottom and start over with
 defense.    Kiss contention good-bye for a few years and build, build,
 build.   All the way up from the very bottom.
 
 Bob Hunt
29.699CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 03 1991 14:3929
29.700What's wrong with Jody Reed at Second?FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Oct 03 1991 14:421
    
29.701I'd gladly make a Billy Ripken for Reed trade :-)STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Thu Oct 03 1991 14:4811
    re .700:
    
    Beat me to it John.  As one who's not a Sox fan, but sees a lot of them
    because they're the local team,  I think Reed has made great progress
    defensively the last couple years.  In particular, he seems to have 50%
    more range this year than in the past.  I'd stop short of putting him
    on the same plane as a Sandberg or a Chico Lind, but have no qualms
    about ranking him on the next level just below.
    
    
    py
29.702More ...SHALOT::HUNTTed, that's the prom queen !!!Thu Oct 03 1991 14:5420
 Hey, I have no real passionate interest in the Red Sox.  Just
 opinions ...
 
 Reed, Rivera, Burks, et al might be just the players the Sox need to
 play good up-the-middle ball.   But I believe the Sox need to stop
 worshipping Dr Long Ball and start playing "little ball" which calls
 for speed, leather, and brains.   
 
 On offense, keep pushing relentlessly for the next base with steals,
 hit-and-runs, singles, sacs, and so on ... and, on defense, smother
 absolutely everything up the middle.
 
 They've let their home park dictate their lineup for far too long
 now.   A 3-2 win in Fenway counts the same as a 10-9 win, too.
 
 And I know what kinda numbers Boggs puts up.   Yeah, they'd be hard,
 if not impossible, to replace.   But the Sox need a team player and
 Boggs is anything but.
 
 Bob Hunt
29.703NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 03 1991 15:1437
    
 > On offense, keep pushing relentlessly for the next base with steals,
 > hit-and-runs, singles, sacs, and so on ... and, on defense, smother
 > absolutely everything up the middle.
    
    Why doesn't everyone do this, Bob?  Sure, it's one formula for success,
    but it's easier said than done to find the players who can do all these
    things and execute them well...
    
    One thing that would be foolish for the Sox to do would be to obtain
    players who can't take any advantage of The Wall.  I'm not talking
    about the guys who are "guaranteed" to hit 50 homers and then come in
    and have trouble hitting 20, or who, like Jack Clark, will hit 25 homers
    but only 15 doubles.  I'm talking about all kinds of hitters, including 
    lefthanders, who can pepper the thing, hit some homers, and run up what 
    should be the near-automatic 40 doubles.  Boggs is the best at this;
    it can't be denied, but it would be ideal if he had a little more speed
    to use once he's gotten to second.  Still, it doesn't make much sense
    to concentrate on hitting balls up the middle when you've got That
    Thing out there to give you easy check-swing doubles (Carlos Quintana
    and Mo Vaughn should take note of this; Phil Plantier already has).
    
    There's also nothing that precludes having an excellent pitching
    staff complemented by a power offense or a speed-based offense (there
    may be some small trade-offs on defense).  Unfortunately, while the Sox
    have developed some decent pitching talent in the last 10-15 years,
    they've been pretty efficient at getting rid of it before it had a
    chance to infect the team with the dreaded disease of "success".
    
    There are no magic formulas.  Overall incompetence by Sox management,
    in a lot of areas, have hurt them more than any supposed wedding to a
    particular philosophy.
    
    glenn
    
    
    
29.704Not so bad... REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Reggie Dupard?Thu Oct 03 1991 15:221
    Doesn't Sam Horn have 23 or so HR's?
29.705CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 03 1991 16:049
29.706WMOIS::COOK_TSkysurfinonmyBoogieBoardThu Oct 03 1991 21:168
    Re .687
    
    Kev, you forgot one thang!  In order to be slandered, you have to start
    with a good name!  8^)
    
    
    Conan
    
29.708I got a scoop!!!!!!1111TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPTue Oct 08 1991 16:158
STOP THE PRESSES, STOP THE PRESSES!

Just got a call from someone who is home today...

The Sox just fired Joe Morgan and replaced him with Butch Hobson.


=Bob=
29.709It's true ...CSCOA1::ROLLINS_Rso what do *I* know, signed MrTTue Oct 08 1991 17:5124
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
 
	BOSTON (UPI) -- Joe Morgan, whose Boston Red Sox collapsed in a
September pennant drive, Tuesday was fired as manager of the club in a
surprise move and replaced by Butch Hobson.
	The Red Sox announced the dismissal at a news conference, two days
after the club completed the season tied for second place, seven games
behind Toronto in the American League East. The Red Sox lost 11 of their
last 14 games after pulling within a half game of the Blue Jays.
	Morgan, part of the Red Sox organization since 1974, had shown no
indication the Red Sox were unhappy with his leadership. Last week he
was asked last week how long he wanted to keep managing.
	``Another hundred years,'' he replied.
	Hobson, a former Red Sox third baseman, managed Boston's Pawtucket
farm team this season to a division championship in the International
League. He received a two-year contract.
	Morgan, 60, of Walpole, Mass., managed the Red Sox for 3 1/2 seasons,
leading Boston to two division titles. He was UPI's Manager of the Year
in 1988 when the Red Sox set an AL record by winning 24 straight home
games. The Red Sox won 12 straight after he became manager in July of
that season.
	Morgan's dismissal comes one day after the New York Yankees removed
Manager Stump Merrill. Of the 26 major-league managers that began the
season, 10 have since been fired, including four in the AL East.
29.710Good interview on 4.CRBOSS::DERRYWasUpAboveIt...NowI'mDownInIt...Wed Oct 09 1991 09:328
    I was like "What?" when I heard this yesterday.  So, who wants
    to tell me why he was fired?  Maybe he couldn't control his day
    care center and some of his actions were questionable but why 
    say the guy was doing an "excellent" job after you've pulled the
    rug out from under him...
    
    Are the 30+ yr old guys making mega $$ really going to "listen" to
    Hobson?  I hope so and wish him luck.
29.711HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Oct 09 1991 09:523
       Gorman says he was afraid he'd lose Hobson to another team. Yeah,
    right Lou.
                                          Denny
29.712CAM::WAYWith Malice Toward NoneWed Oct 09 1991 10:0815
I heard that Morgan said a couple of days ago:

	I'm pleased with second place.  We had a good season
	and second place is a good accomplishment.


If that's true, and I was Gorman, and I'd heard him say it, I'd have
canned him on the spot.

Also, his decisions down the stretch were highly questionable....

Glad he's gone.  Not that it will help, but I'm glad he's gone....


'Saw
29.713FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Oct 09 1991 10:506
    The timing stinks in 1 sense - he's 40 days of major league service
    short of 10 years and a full pension.  He only wanted to manage next
    year anyway and then he would have qualified.  I hope someone will pick
    him up for long enough so he will qualify.
    
    John
29.714Weep not for Granpa Joe.....CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis Today?Wed Oct 09 1991 11:3430
    
    RE:	Pension eligibility
    
    Does the fact that he's been appointed to a scouting position
    
    (at a mere $375K/year) have any bearing on his pension?
    
    
    Hey, I kind of liked the ol' codger but lets face it, when it really
    
    mattered, he blew it big time and went with his hunches instead of
    
    his intellect/experience.  
    
    Karen, loved your reference to "kindergarden"!  Great!!!
    
    What was management to do?  Suspend him for a couple of weeks because
    
    he was screwing up too much and hope that he'd learn?  Either keep him
    
    (with probably the same result) or remove him from the position.  The
    
    latter btw, is NOT IMO a firing.  Joe's been transferred to another
    
    position.  Firing=severence.  Joe's gonna make $375,000 nexted year.
    
    I should be so unfortunate.
    
    Kev
    
29.715STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesWed Oct 09 1991 12:5010
    re .711:
    
    >   Gorman says he was afraid he'd lose Hobson to another team. Yeah,
    >   right Lou.
    
    Hobson's name was mentioned as a possibility (albeit remote) for the
    vacant Yankee manager job.
    
    
    py
29.716;-)RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONone But The BraveWed Oct 09 1991 12:535
    One thing about Hobson, you know that if he argues with the ump and
    kicks dirt, that the dirt will fly over the Umps feet and hit the bat
    boy...
    
    JD
29.717FWI & FWIW Hobson is a ripe ol' 40 years oldCST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis Today?Wed Oct 09 1991 13:101
    
29.718CAM::WAYWith Malice Toward NoneWed Oct 09 1991 13:1211
Yeah, but Kev, it's like this:

	Hobson looks young and fast, like the new Red Sox wannabe

	Morgan looked 100, and like his IQ was even less, and looked
	like Rich Gedman *and* the Chainsaw could beat him in a race.
	Like the new RedSox don't wannabe....


hth,
'Saw
29.719Sure, Lou, what REALLY happened?GLITTR::HILLWed Oct 09 1991 13:1914
    re .711
    I heard that too on channel 5:
    
    Lou: "Well,WeWantedToMakeSureHeDidn'tGetSnappedUpByAnotherTeam.TheBest
    WayToDoThatIsToGetHimToTheMajorsAsSoonAsPossible."
    
    [Quick cut to Hobson]
    
    Q: "Have you been approached by other teams?"
    A: "No."
    
    Seems like they caught Ol' Turkey Neck in a little disingenuousness...
    
    Tom 
29.720CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 09 1991 13:215
29.721AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopWed Oct 09 1991 13:2717
	Paul hit the nail on the head, the Sox were afraid Hobson would go 
to the Yankmees and make them winners leaving them holding  the bag (Morgan) 
and trying to explain why they let boy wonder go but kept the Rain Man.  
Just about every writer is moaning the firing (of course the fact that he 
charmed the press and his stupid quotes were always good copy is probably 
not the reason), but the Sox never won 90 games under Morgan.  And it's 
possible that after what the 'Can said about him, the Slobs could never entice
a black or latin free agent to Boston (of course this is assuming they want 
to).

	As far as Hobson goes I'll say now that the first two guys he butts 
heads with are Boggs and Greenwell and whether or not the club stands 
behind him will go a long way in determining how long Butch will stay.  
Hobson wants to win, but trying to find 9 guys on the Sox who want the same 
thing (re: World Championsip) is damn near impossible.

				/Don
29.722AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopWed Oct 09 1991 13:286
    	I don't believe that a team could've just called up Hobson but
    would've had to contact the Slobs first and get permission.  So it's
    possible that if someone wanted to talk to him he didn't know about
    it.
    
    				/Don
29.723Ground ball to Hobbie.Duck! up the lineCTHQ3::LEARYWed Oct 09 1991 13:5410
    Clell Laverne was goin gray when he played with the Yanks. He looked
    like some ol' codger on the prowl on the Love Boat with his styled
    gray hair, open collar, and chains. Where's John Travolta! ( Hey, you
    got a IOU, budabing!)
    
    Good one JD. My memories of Clell are of him at third base re-adjusting
    his floating bone chips in his right elbow B4 the inning began. Ouch!
    
    MikeL
    
29.724room temperature IQ (tm)HAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersWed Oct 09 1991 14:071
>	Morgan looked 100, and like his IQ was even less, and looked
29.725AGNT99::CHILDSHey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya?Wed Oct 09 1991 14:216
 my recollection of Butch is that heseemed to be a few cards short of a full
 deck.....

 I got to wonder if he'll be able to manage with his brain. I sure he'll be
 able to motivate but I think we'll see another hunch player...
29.726Hebner's toast too...SALEM::DODABill Buckner for Sox Batting CoachWed Oct 09 1991 14:441
29.727I think he should dump the nickname "Butch", though...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 09 1991 15:0819
    
    > Clell Laverne was goin gray when he played with the Yanks. He looked
    > like some ol' codger on the prowl on the Love Boat with his styled
    > gray hair, open collar, and chains. Where's John Travolta! ( Hey, you
    > got a IOU, budabing!)
    
    You caught that too, huh, Mike?  My only thought was that maybe he's
    caught in a time warp and still thinks he's in the glory season of
    1978!
    
    Geez, you would have thought one of those old bluebloods in the Sox'
    front office would have told him to button his shirt, much less put on
    a tie...
    
    (By the way, I support this move entirely.  Continued disrespect from
    the players + bonehaid field managing = gone...)
    
    glenn
    
29.728LUNER::BROOKSClarence T, were you down wit OPP ?Thu Oct 10 1991 14:1412
    Slasher, I think the first player Hobson is going to go to war with is
    Jack Clark.
    
    Like i told allof you lasted winter, Clark is divisive and ovverrated.
    
    Of course Gorman shipped out Lee Smith because he was a problem - how
    many saves did he get anyway ?
    
    Doc
    
    p.s. Was Hobson wearing lipstick during his first interview ?
    Funny-looking guy that Hobson ....
29.729AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlueThu Oct 10 1991 14:247
    	The problem with Lee Smith was Bonehaid Morgan, but it's to
    late to undo the damage he did.  I disagree Doc about Clark.  He can
    go 0-5, but if the team wins he'll be happy.  There are others on
    this team who aren't like that and they'll be the ones to draw Hobson's
    wrath.
    
    				/Don
29.730THE MAN HAD NO CLUE!!!WMOIS::FASSETT_EThu Oct 10 1991 14:378
    re:725
     " My recollection of Butch is that heseemed to be a few cards short of
    a full deck....."
    
    If you were to rate Joe Morgan the same way, the only cards of a deck
    that he had was the 2 JOKERS!!!!!!!!
    
    
29.731CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 10 1991 14:544
29.732AGNT99::CHILDSHey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya?Thu Oct 10 1991 14:544
 Who Slasher, Who??? Spill the beans.....

 mike
29.733not overrated, too predictableCTHQ3::LEARYThu Oct 10 1991 14:577
    Yes Mac, but he was virtually non-existent from April through June.
    Is he being paid to produce for 1/2 the year? Think of where the
    Sox might have been if he did anything the first half. And yes, I'm
    aware of his history.
    
    MikeL
    
29.734Jack Clark - BrownnoseTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPThu Oct 10 1991 15:4510
Clark was what he always was:  a streaky slugger, who made as many big outs 
as he did big hits.  I think the guy is worth keeping around.  He's no William
Bedford (rocket scientist) but he can add somehting when hot.

As far as feuding with Hobson is concerned, however, I wouldn't think so.  Clark
bad mouthed Morgan in the paper the past couple of days, saying that the team's 
attitude was to win in spite of Joe.  To me that sounds liek he is lining up his 
brownie points with management, and gettign ready to suck up to Hobson.

=Bob=
29.735Clark pulled his weight, in generalNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 10 1991 16:5820
    
    Clark is far from overrated.  He's not great, but he's actually better
    than most fans give him credit for.  Most see him as an all-or-nothing
    home run or strikeout guy, but beyond that he is pretty patient at the
    plate, only swings at his pitches or takes the walk.  If you've got 
    someone to pick up from there (which the Sox didn't until Plantier came 
    up and Brunansky was benched), that's a pretty good strategy.  The 
    injuries don't help, though, and they're inevitable with Clark.
    
    It must also be noted that this season the San Diego Padres, without 
    Clark's bat and his supposed disruptive presence on the heels of his 
    fallout with the Wade Boggs of the NL, Tony Gwynn, suffered on
    offense this season as their run scoring dropped significantly (to
    ninth in the league).  Fact is, in the time he was there, Clark was 
    one of the keys to keeping that offense barely afloat (it still wasn't 
    great).  Overrated?  Hardly.  There's more than a few Sox in line ahead
    of him for that honor...
    
    glenn
    
29.736Can I name them Glen??? ;^)AGNT99::CHILDSHey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya?Thu Oct 10 1991 18:150
29.737Have at it, Mike...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 10 1991 18:241
    
29.738my cut at...who's nextAGNT99::CHILDSHey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya?Thu Oct 10 1991 18:289

   Let's see I'd start with Wade, then I think Bruno, followed by in no
 particular order Greenwall, Burks and Vaughn.

 Pena's iffy and Roger most definately makes the list because all though he
 is a most excellent pitcher he's not GAWD. He stinks in the clutch....

 mike
29.739A few moreTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPThu Oct 10 1991 18:428
How's this:
  Jody Reed   - good second baseman, but not untouchable.
  Jeff Readon - Doesn't strike fear in the hearts of opponents like Sox fans 
                think.
  Bill Fisher - Some Sox fans think the guy actually KNOWS something.  I'm glad 
                he's gone.
  
=Bob=
29.740VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Fri Oct 11 1991 01:5012
Clark's probably the last guy I'd worry about being at odds with Hobson.  Say
what you might, Clark is a competitor and a team player.  Yeah, he says some
things that are kind of ridiculous.  He's no politician.  But he's a team
player and plays hard to win and takes it hard when the team loses.

The guys to watch are Mike Greenwell (he might never make it to spring
training), Matt Young (kiss him good bye), and maybe Tom Brunansky, although I
think Bruno will take well to Hobson's style.

But only time will tell.

j.
29.741AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopFri Oct 11 1991 09:341
    
29.742CAM::WAYParty on, GarthFri Oct 11 1991 11:4218
Don't look now, but my morning paper says


		the Gerbil's back....


Gonna be in the box on the 3rd baseline.

Also, heard that Allenson came up and will be the Bullpen coach.


Meantime, Morgan still doesn't have a clue as to why he was fired.  Somehow
I get the impression that Morgan doesn't have much of a clue about 
anything.....



'Saw
29.743AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlueFri Oct 11 1991 11:5329
29.744CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 11 1991 12:166
    Rick Burleson has been named the batting coach.  Anyone would be an
    improvement over Hebner.  Allenson is going to be the bullpen coach? 
    Wasn't he managing in New Britain last year?  I thought they'd move him
    up to Pawtucket.  They had a pretty well respected man in the bullpen
    already that they picked up from the Toronto organization.  I think his
    name is McLaren.  Anyone named to replace Fisher yet?
29.745FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Oct 11 1991 12:2616
    Position	Former Staff		New Staff
    
    1st Base	Al Bumbry		Al Bumbry
    3rd Base	Dick Berardino		Don Zimmer
    Pitching	Bill Fischer		Rich Gale
    Bullpen	John McLaren		Gary Allenson
    Hitting	Richie Hebner		Rick Burleson
    
    Gary Allenson was the manager at New Britain last year and apparently
    had the option of either managing Pawtucket or being the bullpen coach
    for the Red Sox.  Also, I've heard that Roger Clemens is going to
    management to protest the firing of Bill Fischer and I'm willing to bet
    he'll memorialize him in some way in spring training nexted year like
    he did with Jim Rice and Dwight Evans.
    
    John
29.746Bullpen coach?NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 11 1991 12:3510
    Why would anyone want to be the bullpen coach in the bigs instead of
    the manager at the AAA farm club (especially at Pawtucket, one of the
    best minor league franchises in the country)?  Seems like a dumb career
    move for Gary Allenson.  Bullpen coaches get to answer the phone, relay 
    messages, entertain the crazies and try to stay awake through the game,
    all from one of the worst seats in the house.
    
    glenn
    
29.747But Don Zimmer?TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPFri Oct 11 1991 12:374
I'm not surprised the Sox kept Bumbry, just frustrated that they continue to 
resort to such tokenism.

=Bob=
29.748LUNER::BROOKSClarence T, are you down wit OPP ?Fri Oct 11 1991 13:0223
    I think Clark is a better politicain than you give him credit for Jeff.
    Moreover, he's had run-ins EVERYWHERE he's been ... in SF, SD, NY, now
    Boston (St Louis was pretty peaceful on the field, it was with upper mgt
    where he went to war).
    
    re Glenn,
    
    Gwynn = NL Boggs ? Ha. He steals bases, is a Gold Glove cailber RF
    (after being a above-avg CF), and no one EVER questioned his work ethic
    until Clark did. Not managers (past and present), players, peers,
    opponents, or anyone else.
    
    Fact is (here comes the snowstorm), if Clark was black, he'd be another
    Lee Smith, Oil Can, [insert "bad influence"] and would have been
    already packing his bags for another city.
    
    And BoSox mgt. wonders why they can't get any decent black talent here.
    The double-standard is rampant.
    
    Speaking of which, what type of year did that notorious bad influence
    Lee Smith have ? And will Joe Torre want him gone ?
    
    Doc
29.749My assessment had *nothing* to do with raceNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 11 1991 13:1830
                          
    > Gwynn = NL Boggs ? Ha. He steals bases, is a Gold Glove cailber RF
    > (after being a above-avg CF), and no one EVER questioned his work ethic
    > until Clark did. Not managers (past and present), players, peers,
    > opponents, or anyone else.
    
    Sure, Doc, all this might have been true before Gwynn got fat (which
    *is* relevant to work ethic).  Have you been paying any attention to
    what's been going on with Gwynn the past couple years?  Gwynn stole 8 
    bases this year, and was caught 8 times.  Last year he stole a whopping 
    17.  And in spite of his batting average (dominated by singles), his
    OBP is a positively lackluster .355.  Even Clark's was .374!  (Boggs
    was .421 this year.)  I submit that at the current level of decline,
    Gwynn is on the verge of becoming a liability, not an asset, unless he
    comes back in better shape and turns things around.
    
    > Fact is (here comes the snowstorm), if Clark was black, he'd be another
    > Lee Smith, Oil Can, [insert "bad influence"] and would have been
    > already packing his bags for another city.
    
    Complete red herring, as I agree with you 100%.  The Lee Smith thing
    was one of the biggest travesties to unfold here in quite some time
    (far worse than the Oil Can situation, even, the difference being that
    Smith just counted his blessings to be gone, without complaint).  This 
    has nothing to do with Jack Clark's attitude or his perception in
    Boston, though.  I'm going strictly by the numbers, and by the numbers 
    Jack Clark has not been "overrated".
    
    glenn
    
29.750The more things change, the more....CTHQ3::LEARYFri Oct 11 1991 13:3514
    Slasher, few back.
    
    ESPN had better not try to beam anythang off Zip's haid, because with
    that steel plate up there,they will relay Zim's darkest remembrances of
    Funway. "Torrez deals. There's a high fly to left. Yastrzemski looks up
    and it's in the net!" Viewers only hear a distant wail "Bucky 'Bleepin'
    Dent, Bucky 'Bleepin' Dent"
    
    BTW with old boy network in place for Clell Laverne, there's still
    an opening for a sixth coach. Ya think da Stump might be gettin' a
    call?  There's enough spitoons 'round to accommodate him.
    
    MikeL
    
29.751Talk about "appearance challenged". Zip fits that bill...AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlueFri Oct 11 1991 14:101
    
29.752LUNER::BROOKSClarence T, are you down wit OPP ?Fri Oct 11 1991 15:0034
    re .749
    
    First, I didn't mean to imply that your assessment of Clark is racially
    based. I just wanted to bring up that point, since it hadn't been
    touched.
    
    As fo Gwynn, he has never been a particulary swevte man. His
    Pillsbury/Don workout figure has always been the subject of a few
    jokes. As for the declining SB total (believe me, I have him on two
    rotis teams), a big chunk of it is due to him batting 3rd, instead of
    leadoff in the batting order. He's asked to drive in more runs, and
    he's done it. Another factor (this year) was the knee he injured in
    July (he batted just .241 after the All-Star break), and continued to
    play on despite the fact that his BA was dropping like a lead brick
    (which gives lie to Clark's slander of Gwynn's "protecting" his BA). 
    
    Moreover, Gwynn has never been a guy to take a walk when he can get a
    hit (which will be the reason why he won't hit .400), and that affects
    the OBP. Finally, Gywnn has never had a lot of protection in the
    batting order. Bip Roberts was the best leadoff man the Pads had for
    Gywnn since the late Alan Wiggins, but he never got untracked this
    year. You get a speedster in front of Gwynn, McGriff and another big
    bat behind him, and Tony will hit .370 again.
    
    Now tell me this - Why does Boggs get lambasted for not swinging enough
    to be a run producer, yet Gwynn is nailed over his OBP ? What will make
    these so-called pundits happy ?
    
    Yes, Gywnn is not the player he was 4 years ago, but not nearly a
    liability either, and he won't be for a while.
    
    Regards,
    
    Doc
29.753LUNER::BROOKSClarence T, are you down wit OPP ?Fri Oct 11 1991 15:0723
    More on Jack The Wiffer :
    
    Clark by the numbers had a decent season : .250, 28 HR's 89 RBI. .370
    OBP.
    
    The reality is that a large portion of those numbers came when the Sox
    were DEEP in the hole, and looked dead. When it mattered early, and
    late, he was a non-factor. When they were 11.5, 9 out, he was a terror.
    
    Sorry Glenn, that doesn't hack it my book.
    
    As for the human relations part, Clark will wind up being a seriously
    divisive factor on this team, if he hasn't been already. At least
    Greenwell wears it on his sleeve. Clark has more finesse. Do you really
    think Clark waited until AFTER the Morgan canning to let his teammates
    and management know how he felt ?
    
    At some point next season, Hobson and Clark will have a few rounds at
    each other - I hope I'm wrong, but I'd bet on it ...
    
    Doc
    
    
29.754I'm sure he'll butt heads again-- doesn't bother meNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 11 1991 15:2225
    
    Doc, my point is that all this stuff about being "divisive" and a "bad
    influence" is mostly garbage, which is why I brought up the point that
    getting him out of the San Diego clubhouse didn't help their team one
    bit.  The important thing is what you do on the field.  You yourself 
    have long argued that such labels are often applied stereotypically and 
    capriciously, that they're unfair and dangerous, and I agree.  I don't 
    see how it's any different with Clark.  Everyone knows that Clark 
    shoots off his mouth, and I disagree that he does so tactfully or 
    cleverly.  Even Morgan (who has shown an amazing amount of class over 
    his firing) brushed off Clark's comments as just part of his
    schizophrenic up-and-down behavior.
    
    As for Clark's performance, beyond the raw stats I read somewhere that 
    a very high percentage of his 28 homers came in close game situations
    with the game on the line.  Sure, he was terrible in the beginning of
    the season (as always), but you can't brush off what he did as purely 
    garbage-time production, not considering that the Sox pulled to within 
    a half game with Clark as a big reason for it (but with Plantier as the
    major force).  Hey, I've admitted that he's not great, just that he did
    what was expected.  There were too many other shortcomings and holes to
    fill, but Clark wasn't one of them.
    
    glenn
    
29.755SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 11 1991 15:427
29.756Slowest HR trot on recordSMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 11 1991 16:078
29.757FSDEV::MGILBERTKids are our Future-Teach 'em WellFri Oct 11 1991 17:337
    
    Clemens ought to sit down and shut his mouth until he's got enough of
    Jean Yawkey's money to buy her out. He was the lead guy in the "Gang of
    10" that got Morgan fired. Joe Morgan wasn't my favorite Red Sox
    Manager but Gorman was the one who should have gone.
    
    
29.758Now that Mao's widow is dead...SPARKL::HILLFri Oct 11 1991 17:396
    re last
    Huh? Could you elaborate on this? I didn't get a paper today, but did
    Clemens come up with one of his gems? Who are the "Gang of 10"? Seems
    that a lot of the players might not have cared for Tollway Joe.
    
    Tom 
29.759You played yourself there Mac ...EARRTH::BROOKSClarence T, are you down wit OPP ?Fri Oct 11 1991 20:147
    re .755
    
    Rodney Peete - Mac, what is that stiff doing in Detroit anyway ?
    
    heh heh heh 
    
    Doc
29.760DECWET::METZGERGojiro, defender of the EvolooFri Oct 11 1991 20:2414
 >   re .755
 >   
 >   Rodney Peete - Mac, what is that stiff doing in Detroit anyway ?
 >   
 >   heh heh heh 
 >   
 >   Doc


 Don't you mean Andre Ware, Doc? Or was that Major Harris ? You've had so many
favorites I forget...


Metz
29.761STAR::YANKOWSKASAny knucklehead can scoreMon Nov 11 1991 11:225
    SportsChannel will be showing Roger Clemens' 20-strikeout game tonight
    at 9 PM Eastern Time (part of their "Baseball's Greatest Games" series). 
    
    
    py
29.762CLEMENS WIN CY YOUNG #3ESKIMO::GARRYGo IrishWed Nov 13 1991 21:2011
    This notes for Mike Childs,Kevin West and Paul(swindell)Gronowski,your
    least favorite hurler has won his 3RD CY YOUNG award by a landslide.
    Rocket Roger Clemens has once again proved he is the best in the game 
    today bar none.Say what you want but he is the most consistent man
    out there and every team would love to have a pitcher with half his
    credentials,he is only 29 so he still may win another 2 or 3.
    It only goes to show that the voters don't only look at "wins" they 
    look at overall stats and he is the best at his position for the
    year 1991.
    
    Tom
29.763step up Joe H.CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorThu Nov 14 1991 14:497
 Pure BS Tom. I swear he must have split his bonus with the writers. He wins
 the thing on two good months. The rest of time it was JACKCITY BABEE!!!

 and the biggest game of the year where was the dominating stuff? 

 heck he wasn't even the most valuable pitcher on his own team....
29.764CAM::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Thu Nov 14 1991 14:561
Mike, please tell us how you REALLY feel ;^)
29.765FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Nov 14 1991 15:0010
    It's not worth getting an ulcer over.  Remember, these are opinions and
    they are like a**holes - everyone has one.
    
    My own viewpoint - whether or not he "deserved" it (and until the
    standards are a bit more quantified, deserved is a bit nebulous), it's
    nice to see as a Red Sox fan but it doesn't take the place of a World
    Series win.  I'd trade every individual honor received by Sox players
    in my lifetime in return for a couple of World Series wins.
    
    John
29.766FDCV07::KINGBe nice to me, I'm a Pheresis Donor!!Thu Nov 14 1991 15:257
    John, you forgot the whole saying.....
    
    Opinions are like a$$holes... Just some are bigger than others...
    
    REK
    
    :-}
29.767CAM::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Thu Nov 14 1991 15:474
>    Opinions are like a$$holes... Just some are bigger than others...
    
Yeah, but a$$holes are useful and have a purpose.  Some people's 
opinions aren't 8^)
29.768GENRAL::WADEGimme the beat boysThu Nov 14 1991 16:004
    
    	You forgot something else:   ...and they all stink.
    
    	Claybroon
29.769AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Nov 14 1991 17:394
    	Come on now Mike.  If you keep acting like this you ain't getting
    that autographed picture of Roger and Wade I promised you.
    
    				/Don
29.770ROGER CLEMENS IS GOD - A great individual contributor...ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 14 1991 17:5013
    
    re: .762
    
    That's what the Sox need... a bunch of individual contributors who
    win individual awards and CHOKE when it comes down to crunch time.
    
    BTW, winning the AL Cy Young does not make Roger Clemens the
    "best in the game bar none".
    
    One more thought for you to ponder Mr Garry... its been 73 years
    since the last Sox WS title... and we're still counting.  I'm sure
    Scott Erickson is sitting at home saying "Geez, I sure wish I could
    trade this WS ring in for one of those Cy Young Awards..."
29.771ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 14 1991 17:514
    
    Has Roger Clemens ever won a World Series game?  Seriously, because
    I don't know.
    
29.772MEIS::SIKESThu Nov 14 1991 18:1628
Re:.770 
    
>    That's what the Sox need... a bunch of individual contributors who
>    win individual awards and CHOKE when it comes down to crunch time.
 
 How dare Clemens give up 2.62 earned runs a game, and pitch an average
of 7.8 innings per start, why didn't he do something for the team?!?
    
>    BTW, winning the AL Cy Young does not make Roger Clemens the
>    "best in the game bar none".

 Right, it just makes him the best pitcher in the AL for the 1991 
regular season.
    
>    One more thought for you to ponder Mr Garry... its been 73 years
>    since the last Sox WS title... and we're still counting.  I'm sure
>    Scott Erickson is sitting at home saying "Geez, I sure wish I could
>    trade this WS ring in for one of those Cy Young Awards..."

 Probably more like "Geez, if Clemens hadn't pitched so well, I would've
won the Cy Young..."

 I still don't understand how much more a pitcher can do for his team than
hold the other team to as few runs as possible, while lasting as far into
the game as possible? 

Bob

29.773CSOA1::BACHTHE Chicago Bear FanThu Nov 14 1991 18:165
    RE: .770 (Groanowski)
    
    Try being a Cub_Fan...
    
    Chip_GSH_Bach
29.774FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Nov 14 1991 18:2316
    Roger Clemens winning the Cy Young award doesn't make him a bad person
    or a selfish pitcher.  It may or may not over inflate his achievements. 
    I'm glad he's on the Red Sox and I hope he stays here for the length of
    his career.  His work ethic is second-to-none, I believe he's maturing
    as a person and I hope the good parts of his personality and game would
    rub off on his teammates.
    
    I will not get into the merits of whether he deserved the award or not
    because I don't believe in individual awards in team sports.
    
    I still feel, though, that his individual achievement is worth far less
    than it would be if it was done in the context of a World Series title
    for the Sox.  I am nowhere near as happy with all these individual
    awards as I would be with just 1 measly World Series win.
    
    John
29.775ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Nov 14 1991 18:4212
    
    re: .773
    
    
    I'm an Indians fan...  that's right up there with being a Cubs
    fan, but not quite as bad as being a Sox fan.  See, with the Indians
    and Cubs, there is always hope... the Sox have proven they will
    Choke every time...  its not even much fun to root against them
    anymore (other than the financial gains to be had living in this
    area - MA).
    
    
29.776CELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinThu Nov 14 1991 19:1211
    
>> How dare Clemens give up 2.62 earned runs a game, and pitch an average
>>of 7.8 innings per start, why didn't he do something for the team?!?
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Does the designated $hitter get an assist on the Cy Young award. 
    Without the DH he only would've pitched about 5 or 6 inning per start,
    on the average.
    
    JaKe
    
29.777EARRTH::BROOKSOPP ? No ! Are you down wit HIV ?Thu Nov 14 1991 20:1210
    re JAke
    
    The DH also means that his ERA is all the more impressive since he
    isn't facing an automatic out 3 times a game (at least).
    
    re Groaner
    
    'there's always hope [for a Cleveland fan] ....'
    
    Of what ? Finishing over .500 ?
29.778RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOAren't Reaganomics Wonderful!Thu Nov 14 1991 21:259
    ALl I hope is that along with the Cy Young, they gave Roger a videotape
    that included the pitching performance of Avery, Smolz, and Morris -
    entitled "How to Pitch in Big Games" - and I hope Roger watches it
    about a zillion times.
    
    He's d great pitcher.  No arguement.  But personally, there are a lot
    of pitchers I'd give the ball to before Roger come big game time.
    
    JD
29.780Roger well deserving thised year.KEPNUT::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Fri Nov 15 1991 10:5512
    
    If Roger's mates could've held on to the lead more often, Clemens
    could've easily won over 20 this year. Look it up, he left at least
    4 games witha one or two run lead and the team lost. They had a 
    break down of his game by game perfomance in the Globe yesterday.
    Say for about 4 lousy games he was in every other one. Pretty damn
    good when you lead the league in starts, not to mention K's, shutouts, 
    and ERA. 
    
    
    
    Steve
29.781Can Bob Feller still pitch?CTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSFri Nov 15 1991 11:269
    New rallying cry for Cleveland
    "Hope for the Indians in '92"
    
    Let's complete the phrase
    "Hope for the Indians in '92 to average 5,000 per game and git 60 wins"
    
    HTH
    MikeL
    
29.782Paul, U din't buy my CLE games this yr? Why?SALEM::DODADavid Duke is a sheetheadFri Nov 15 1991 12:1211
Re: .781

Ha!

When was the last time the Indians finished over .500? Hope?

Damn these Red Sox, every year they're in it till the end and I 
have to keep watching them. If I were an Indian fan, I could 
start looking forward to football( ha!) at the All-Star break.

daryll
29.783CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorFri Nov 15 1991 12:189
 Yeah Doc, but by the same token how many times would Roger have lasted 7 or
 more innings without the DG? His ERA would have been alot worst cause when
 he was getting tattooed it was early. In the NL he'd have been pulled early
 for offense and hence a higher ERA....

 In the NL where the high hard one is just another ball, he'd be in trouble..

 mike
29.784Great pitching is great pitching...GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Nov 15 1991 12:3217
    
    The DH versus having to come out early in the NL would be a wash
    for Clemens.  The bigger effect would be getting out of Fenway Park
    and pitching in those more spacious parks in the National League.
    Clemens would almost certainly be helped there, as on average all
    NL pitchers are, much less pitchers moving from Fenway to the NL
    (take a look at Bruce Hurst, Bob Ojeda, John Tudor's ERA numbers, 
    before and after).
    
    Sure, Roger would have to make an adjustment to the strike zones
    of a new set of umpires.  While some NL umpires take away the high 
    strike, they also have the tendency in the NL to widen it as
    compensation.  Clemens has good control, and lives on the corners.
    He'd do just fine, 'cause he's Roger... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.785HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Fri Nov 15 1991 12:446
       Since the inception of divisional play in baseball in the 1960s,
    every team has finished ahead of every other team in it's division at
    least once, except for 1 case. The Cleveland Indians have NEVER
    finished ahead of the Boston Red Sox during that 20+ year stretch.
    HTH
                                  Denny
29.786AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Nov 15 1991 12:484
    	That tears it Childs, I'm sending the autographed Wade&Roger
    picture to JD!
    
    				/Don
29.787ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 15 1991 13:068
    
    re: .785
    
    Denny, I hate the break the news to you... finishing about the Indians
    over the past 20 years is no great accomplishment.  
    
    Since the Red Sox World Series title in 1918, the Red Sox HAVE NOT
    won another... since that time, the Indians have.
29.788ESKIMO::GARRYGo IrishFri Nov 15 1991 16:048
    Mike C admit it a great pitcher is a great pitcher regardless of the
    league he pitches in...if you are so sure Rocketman woould'nt do well
    in the NL how come the NL's best don't hammer him in the allstar game
    Clemens mows them down every time.
    Sounds like sour grapes to me....and besides depite all your negative
    notess about him how come you have a picture of him in your office?
    
    Tom
29.789And if he was in the Japan league bla bla...CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Fri Nov 15 1991 16:057
As usual, Childs is grasping at straws. Why don't you just admit it Mike, 
Clemens is the best pitcher in the Americam League for the '91 season.
It's not hard, come on you can say it...8^)


Steve
29.790CRBOSS::DERRYHere We Are Now...Entertain UsFri Nov 15 1991 17:135
>    Sounds like sour grapes to me....and besides depite all your negative
>    notess about him how come you have a picture of him in your office?
  
    Must be that nice autographed picture that I gave him.   I knew he'd
    treasure it.
29.791ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Nov 15 1991 17:236
    
    I noticed alot of small (dart sized) holes in that picture last time
    I was in Mike's office.  That might be a clue as to what he's using
    it for.  Also, I didn't know that Roger had a beard - he does in
    the picture that Mike has in his office.
    
29.792CELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinFri Nov 15 1991 17:4514
    
    >>If Roger's mates could've held on to the lead more often, Clemens
      ^^
      ^^
    
    Yeah, that good old word    "IF"
    
    Ya know, IF your uncle had mammaries you'd call him "Aunt"
    
    
    Schnort Schitt SChwanz
    
    JaKe
    
29.793Goose? Gander? Bueller?CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Fri Nov 15 1991 17:525
Just tryin' to make a point Rake. If Mike can speculate so cans I!


Steve
29.794CELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinFri Nov 15 1991 18:058
    Steve,
    
    Just busting your chops!!
    
    Went back and noticed I forgot the smiley, meant there to be one.
    
    JaKe
    
29.795no was GCNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorSun Nov 17 1991 11:5623

 I still believe I ain't grasping at straws. Sure he put up some mavelous
 stats but he started what 6-0 then we won like six more in the august time
 fram so for other four months of the baseball season he was hardly dominating
 goinging 6-10. He was repeatly bombarded early in games, games which he would
 have been pulled in the NL but hung in would shut them down for 3 or 4 innings
 With his wide strikezone of course he's going to get easier K's and more K's
 lead to a lower ERA.

 The point is he certain was in the top 3 but he blew that game when they
 were 1 out it the last week of the year when yor ACE is absolutely postively
 supposed to win (ie Viola, Hershier, Morris).     

 He was inconsistent durning the year as was Erickson but Abbott was pretty
 steady with a little less spectacular figures. Given Clemens already owned
 2 why not give it to someone else who had stats that were on par with his.
 Also Erickson did get 20 whixh was supposed to be the magic number...

 Glenn I agree he would be able to adjust to the NL league umps, but his
 bread and butter has been the high hardone...

 mike
29.796Well Fileder had 60 hmrs but he won lasted year so lets...CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Mon Nov 18 1991 09:5712
He was repeatly bombarded early in games, games which he would
 have been pulled in the NL 


Mike this statement has no bearing, Clemens pithches in the AL. 
Therefore I submit that you are grasping at least one straw! 8^)

Jake, don't you think I knew that? What makes you think I didn't
know that? I knew that? 8^)))


Steve
29.797CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 18 1991 11:504
    Mike, even when Clemens went into his "slump", his ERA was around 3 in
    those games.  He finished in the top 3 of just about every category
    that a starting pitcher is measured by.  You don't do that by going
    south for a significant part of the season.
29.798AXIS::ROBICHAUDN.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptusMon Nov 18 1991 11:595
    	I agree Mike, you're not grasping at straws...
    
    	You're grasping at air.
    
    				/Don
29.799It don't add up!CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEMon Nov 18 1991 13:427
    I gotta agree with Mike one this one, the Cy Young Award should not be
    based on statistics and facts.
    
    It should be awarded based on the total sum of each players
    intangibles.  
    
    lEe  :*)
29.800AXIS::ROBICHAUDN.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptusMon Nov 18 1991 14:221
    	That's what Don Zimmer will bring to this team.  Intangerbils!
29.801Here's something for the Clemens bashers to muddle overCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 26 1991 13:0421
              <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                          -< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 108.528                      Roger Clemens                       528 of 532
MEIS::SIKES                                          14 lines  26-NOV-1991 08:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: .524 

 Clemens' career statistics through 1990.....    

                          W -  L  ERA
 Before All-Star break   65 - 30  3.11
  After All-Star break   51 - 21  2.58

                April    18 -  6  2.30
                May      22 - 10  3.15
                June     20 - 10  3.52
                July     19 - 10  2.71
                August   20 -  9  3.23
                Sept/Oct 17 -  6  2.19
    
29.802CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILETue Nov 26 1991 14:103
    Mac, did you send a copy directly to Mike?
    
    LeE  :*)
29.803CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 26 1991 15:072
    I sure did LeE.  Mike said he's going to take it to a card show that
    Roger is appearing at and pay the $15 to have him autograph it.
29.804CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalTue Nov 26 1991 15:184
 that's if I can't get him to autograph my body....

 ;^)
29.805CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 26 1991 15:271
    Mike, I think that will cost ya extra.
29.806vs Contenders...see there's still plenty to bashCSCMA::FINIZIOHey Get a grep on itTue Nov 26 1991 18:204
    
    	How about a breakdown of CLemens stats in games that mean
    	something?
    
29.807GUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Nov 26 1991 18:477
    
>             -< vs Contenders...see there's still plenty to bash >-
 
    Can someone please run the numbers minus the Yankee games?
    
    glenn
    
29.808you get the idea...ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Nov 26 1991 18:503
    
    Has Roger Clemens ever beaten the Mets?  Has Roger Clemens ever
    beaten Super Contra for NES?  Has Roger Clemens...
29.809CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Nov 26 1991 19:037
    Bob, when you can successfully define "Meaningful Game", I'm sure
    someone can come up with the numbers.
    
    Only the NL president will tell you that a game in September means more
    than a game in April.  And even if you do agree with the NL Prez,
    Roger's stats shows he is consistent, if not better as the season gets
    "more meaningful".
29.810CELTIK::JACOBR.I.P, Badger BobTue Nov 26 1991 21:4211
    >><<< Note 29.808 by ROCK::GRONOWSKI "the dream is always the same..." >>>
    >>                        -< you get the idea... >-

    
    >>Has Roger Clemens ever beaten the Mets?  Has Roger Clemens ever
    >>beaten Super Contra for NES?  Has Roger Clemens...
    
    Has da Groaner ever put in a meaningful note in his lifetime??????
    
    JaKe
    
29.811CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEWed Nov 27 1991 09:065
    Ha ha ha ha ha, you really got me rooooolllling on that one, Jake!
    
    :*)  :*)
    
    lEe
29.812To much pressure for himCSCMA::FINIZIOHey Get a grep on itWed Nov 27 1991 10:565
    
    
    	Actually if you run the stats minus the Yankees, Clemens era
    	should drop as the Yankees own Clemens....
    
29.813ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Nov 27 1991 11:522
    BowlingPinMan (aka Jake), I entered a meaningful note once... which
    is more than I can say about you.
29.814MCIS1::DHAMELCharlie! He walka like 'dis..Fri Dec 13 1991 18:0715
    
    Rocket Roger was found not guilty on assault or whatever charges were
    pressed against him as a result of his bar room brawl incident.
    
    Since the event took place in Texas, he still has to face further
    charges of "NOT having a gun without a good reason".  I understand the 
    law is pretty strict about that in Texas. [isfh]
    
    But all seriousness aside, how come this important trial was not
    carried by the "Court Channel" and CNN??  I mean they spent all
    that time covering the William K. Smith thang, and how many Cy Young's
    has *he* ever won???
    
    Dickstah
    
29.815No really, the farce is not over!GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Dec 13 1991 18:4723
                           
    Just another defeat in absentia for our dear departed friend, Dan 
    Schneider.  When the facks came out, Roger was guilty of being
    inebriated and putting a moonlighting cop/security guard, who had
    just knocked Clem's brother to the floor, in a "bear hug" (as 
    described so damagingly by the prosecution's star witness).  Dan 
    was trying to convince us that this "barroom brawl" was yet another
    clear example of Roger's pattern of borderline psychotic behavior.
    If anything Clemens was trying to prevent a fight and/or keep his
    brother from getting his head kicked in!
    
    Never ones to call it a day and save the taxpayers a few bucks, 
    though, the DA's office has filed new charges against Clemens on a 
    Class B misdemeanor (now down from a felony count of assaulting
    a police officer and a Class A misdemeanor for hindering arrest--
    the judge delivered a directed verdict on this second count as 
    Clemens' brother had already been arrested when the "assault" 
    occurred) for "interfering with a police officer".  Gotta luv that 
    Texas judicial system, especially Houston's...
    
    glenn
    
    
29.816CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Dec 13 1991 18:524
29.817CNTROL::CHILDSSpecializing in feather ruffling notesMon Dec 16 1991 12:375
 yeah but it's basketball season Mac and I got time to deal with Clemens.
 Besides I've been a 5 maybe 6 maybe a dozen bar brawls in mt life time 
 too so I know you never know who started what other than the Alchol was
 to BLAM (TM)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
29.818MCIS1::DHAMELWe *all* put the yeast in!Fri Dec 20 1991 13:049
    
    Sox finally orchestrate a deal.
    
    Viola will play in Boston, if the Doctors determine he's in tune.
    
    Parade in October!
    
    Dickstah
    
29.819AXIS::ROBICHAUDAKinderGentlerBigGame?Fri Dec 20 1991 13:053
    	Sox sign Viola!
    	
    	Surgery is June!
29.820HPSRAD::RIEURead his Lips...Know new taxesFri Dec 20 1991 14:073
       Who's June? 
       And cain she pitch?
                                    Denny
29.821Frankley, does it matter?CST17::FARLEYDashing throught da Droods(tm)Fri Dec 20 1991 14:211
    
29.822SALEM::TIMMONSTHEY MUSTA SEEN ME AT THE Y!Tue Dec 24 1991 12:425
    Will he be rated behind Clemens?  If so, will he be playing second
    fiddle, or second viola?
    
    lEe
    
29.823SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Jan 17 1992 09:034
    Heard today that the Sox have signed Jim Rice as a roving hitting
    instructor/coach.
    
    Lee
29.824AXIS::ROBICHAUDHOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknightFri Jan 17 1992 09:292
    ...a move that guarantees the team will lead the league in double
    plays into the next century.
29.825AXIS::ROBICHAUDCrashCansecoStrikesAgainFri Feb 14 1992 16:021
    	Why are the Slobs and Jody Reed going to arbitration over $100K?
29.826'cus Jody is a cheesedickSALEM::DODASend a Message: Laughlin for PresidentTue Feb 18 1992 16:010
29.827RUGBY1::wayCheesed a big one offTue Feb 18 1992 16:5017
Darryl!

You can't say that in NOTES!


You have to use some other expression, something like:


	He is a penicular appendage composed of dairy product material.

	He is a cheese-weinie.

	He is a cheese-Richard...


hope this helps,
'Saw	
29.828'cus Jody is a dairy-type appendageSALEM::DODASend a Message: Laughlin for PresidentTue Feb 18 1992 17:011
29.829AXIS::ROBICHAUDHomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCansecoTue Feb 18 1992 17:501
    	Wade Boggs has been lifting weights!  Parade in October!
29.830the fat lady doesn't countFRETZ::HEISERstop making sense!Tue Feb 18 1992 17:551
>    	Wade Boggs has been lifting weights!  Parade in October!
29.831PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Tue Feb 18 1992 18:004
What can't you say?  Cheese?  Or Dick?  One's going to piss off /Don and the
other will certainly aggravate Mr. Hamel.

j.
29.832CAMONE::WAYCheesed a big one offTue Feb 18 1992 18:1011
You can say "Cheese" and you can say "Dick", but you can't say the
both of them together without another word or three or seventeen in
between to separate them.

Unlike the two words pencil and neck, which you can put together, cheese
and dick don't fit together in a "family" style atmosphere here...

It's called politically correct (formerly kinder and gentler) vocabulary.


'Saw
29.833AXIS::ROBICHAUDHomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCansecoTue Feb 18 1992 18:141
    	Whooda thunk Jody Reed would spark such controversy!  8^o
29.834politically correct is an oxymoron!FRETZ::HEISERstop making sense!Tue Feb 18 1992 20:260
29.835SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Wed Feb 19 1992 14:574
    Hmmm, my Dad had a oxymoron ring that he got from his father.  Why is
    that politically correct?
    
    lEe  :*)
29.836SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesFri Feb 21 1992 12:335
       Jean Yawkey had a stroke last night and is in serious condition at
    MGH. TeeVee said that if she should pass on the partnership or
    shareholders agreement says  the team will be sold to the highest
    bidder.
                                             Denny
29.837his bid might be too high thoughFRETZ::HEISERstop making sense!Fri Feb 21 1992 13:031
    Maybe that's what Hawk saved the ticket money for.
29.838FSDEV::MGILBERTGHWB-Anywhere But America Tour 92Fri Feb 21 1992 14:1010
    
    Actually I'ld look to see a number of players should this occur. First
    and foremost is Harrington. He's got the most to lose by losing
    control. Next watch and see if Haywood Sullivan or Buddy Leroux begin 
    to accumulate money promises. I'ld also watch the local sports guys
    like Paul Fireman of Reebok. Harrington, IMO, would be ok. Sullivan
    and Leroux would be absolute disasters (they've lost their interest in
    anything but making a buck). Fireman would probably be the best guy.
    
     
29.839RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Fri Feb 21 1992 14:165
    Gee, imagine if a consortium wanted to buy them and move them from
    Fenway.  Wouldn't that be something?  Wonder what the reaction would be
    by certain noters....
    
    JD
29.840FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Feb 21 1992 14:208
    One of the major, major pieces of the team's worth is Fenway Park and
    the land it sits on.  Sooner or later, Fenway Park is going to have to
    be replaced.  I've often thought the Red Sox are very quietly
    stockpiling land (like Disney did down in Florida) to build their
    future home.  I can never see the Red Sox going into a multipurpose
    stadium that they don't own - they'll want to maintain control.
    
    John
29.841NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 21 1992 14:2914
    
    > Gee, imagine if a consortium wanted to buy them and move them from
    > Fenway.  Wouldn't that be something?  Wonder what the reaction would be
    > by certain noters....
    
    I'd probably want the commissioner to get involved to protect the
    interests of the fans, just as I've argued all along...
    
    I don't think you're going to see Buddy LeRoux back with the Red Sox. 
    In the first place, he's no longer even a limited partner, right?  In
    the second place, he's got no money...
    
    glenn
     
29.842good but futile.....CST17::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Fri Feb 21 1992 14:3013
    I heard a Japanese group is going to submit a bit.  If accepted, many
    of the players and management are going to be fired or replaced.
    
    Apparently this group is lead by a no nonsense Japanese businessman
    named
    
    	Wyn Won Suun
    
    
    ta boom
    
    Kev
    
29.843SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Feb 21 1992 14:584
    I wonder if the comments from that ingrate, Jody Reed, had anything to
    do with her having the stroke?
    
    lEl
29.844That cheesedi, uh, dairy-type appendage!SALEM::DODAReform DCU: Elect Petition CandidatesFri Feb 21 1992 15:241
29.845Move to California by 4/20, please...SASE::SZABOFri Feb 21 1992 15:455
    Hey, if they move, I wouldn't have to find those damn tickets that I
    ain't gonna find anyway...
    
    Hawk
    
29.846CNTROL::CHILDSmake the right choice, TsongasFri Feb 21 1992 18:249
 Just imagine if I could afford to buy em....hahahahaaa

 The thought of Roger washing my car and Boggs cutting my grass is too good
 to be true.....

 think Bill Murray would coach em' for me???

 ;^)e+10
29.847SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Feb 24 1992 11:055
       The 'Q' was in an auto accident in Venezuela. He has a broken foot
    and a broken arm. Gil Santos said Q was on his way to the hospital with
    his brother who had been SHOT, when he sideswiped a car and hit a
    bridge. Musta been a tough weekend.
                                        Denny
29.848CAMONE::WAYYou'll be left with empty armsMon Feb 24 1992 11:1017
Article in yesterday's Courant (which I found out is the oldest paper in the
US), about the Sox.


It mentioned that Hobson is very different from Morgan, in that he's very
dynamic and expects everybody put out a bazillion percent.  It said
that could cause problems with the old "wealthy" veterans.

It said that the team was pretty much the same as last year excepting
for the addition of Viola.....


The way I see it, the Sox finish second or third in a hunt that includes
Toronto and Detroit.  Toronto wins the East....


'Saw
29.849JARETH::YANKOWSKASMy father has only memory of itMon Feb 24 1992 11:1213
    > It mentioned that Hobson is very different from Morgan, in that he's
    > very dynamic and expects everybody put out a bazillion percent.  It
    > said that could cause problems with the old "wealthy" veterans.
    
    Maybe that'll be the kick in the pants this team needs.
    
    I'll agree with your prediction of Toronto finishing first IF they have
    a healthy Dave Steib all season...Steib only started nine games last
    year, a full productive season from him would mean as much to the Jays
    as the addition of Viola will to the Sox.
    
    
    py
29.850USCTR2::NAHEARNMon Feb 24 1992 14:138
    I predict the Sox by 7 games over Toronto.   They win the ALCS is five
    games and the Series in six!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
29.851MCIS1::DHAMELForgot to cut my imbecilical cordMon Feb 24 1992 14:306
    
    Well, now it looks like Moe Vaughn gets the chance to play full time
    and prove himself.  Think you can walk the walk, Moe?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.852I'm NOT making this up!SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesTue Feb 25 1992 15:007
       It was all over the nooze lasted night that The Rocket didn't show
    up with the rest of the pitchers and catchers yesterday. Bob Lobel
    tracked down the reason: He'll appear tomorrow for a charity bartending
    gig at, get this,
    The Velvet Elvis in Houston!
    Must be onea Doc's old haunts eh?
                                    Denny  8^)
29.853According to Tank...SASE::SZABOTue Feb 25 1992 15:467
    Supposedly, Roger has a clause in his contract that allows him to
    arrive 1 week after pitcher/catcher camp opens.  Supposedly, Butch was
    on the horn to him last night.  Supposedly, Roger will show before the
    1 week is up...
    
    Hawk
    
29.854CAMONE::WAYYou'll be left with empty armsTue Feb 25 1992 16:025
Yes, I've heard the same thing, only I heard that he didn't have to
show up until 3/6.


'Saw
29.855It's in there...CUBIC7::DIGGINSPlaydough,Homey,Vitale,BobKnightTue Feb 25 1992 16:105
ALL MLB players have it in their contract that they don't have to 
show up for spring training until 3/6, not just Rog...

Phoe shit shlep 
29.856It's a throw to 1st Babeeeeee!!!!!7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Tue Feb 25 1992 19:5812
    
    another rumor has it that while Dick Macdunna (sp?) does stuff
    for CBS, Channel 38 has spoken to (double gasp!)
    
    
    
    Dick Vitale to do the Sox games!!!!
    
    schlop srtep shcepl
    
    Kev
    
29.857PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Feb 25 1992 20:027
29.858AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhere's Roger?Wed Feb 26 1992 12:385
    	The look on Hobson's face when asked about Roger is priceless.
    This is the 90's and 5 million dollars a year says more about who's
    boss than a title.  
    
    				/Don
29.859FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Feb 26 1992 19:224
    It's being reported in the Red Sox conference that Jean Yawkey has just
    died.
    
    John
29.860MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 27 1992 12:3914
    Jean Yawkey passed away yesterday after suffering a stroke last week. 
    Mrs. Yawkey was 83.  The Yawkeys have owned the Red Sox since 1933. 
    The Flag at Winter Haven is flying at half mast.
    
    Greenwell ended his silent treatment of the press by saying that he
    resented Morgan letting him hang out to dry after the batting cage
    incident with Mo Vaughn.
    
    Tank of WBCN (please, no Tank bashing, it's been done to death)
    supposedly spoke to Roger Clemens on the phone yesterday.  Roger had no
    idea that his showing up "late" for Spring Training would be viewed as
    undermining the manager's authority.  He just had some things to do
    before camp officially opened.  He's going to meet with Butch privately
    when he gets into Winter Haven.
29.861TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey IS two!!!Thu Feb 27 1992 12:4612
Lotsa stuff in the Boston area rags about the future of the team.  I've heard 
everything from they will go on status quo for ever, to they will be sold within
a year.  

One thing in the Sox favor is that, unlike some ownership, the majority of the 
profits of the company (JRY Corp.) goes back into the team.  This means that 
they can continue to spend the exorbinant amounts of money on free agents, etc.

Boston is so provincial, that if someone from outside New England tried to buy 
the team, it would be like the Nintendo trying to buy the Mariners.

=Bob=
29.862SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesThu Feb 27 1992 12:5310
       Will McDonough was talking about the Yawkeys on the radio yesterday
    afternoon. Tom Yawkey told his GMs  he didn't want to lose money, BUT
    he also didn't care if he made money. That's why the Sox have had one
    of the highest payrolls for so long. Jean continued the tradition.
       WD also had this observation: "The Sox and Fenway are worth
    $150 million. If somebody borrows that much money to buy the team, at
    10% interest, their interest payments alone will take up the first $15
    million of income each year. Look for a lot of cahnges if they're
    sold."
                                     Denny 
29.863AXIS::ROBICHAUDGreenwell talks, Roger balksThu Feb 27 1992 13:3213
	McDonough also said that Mrs. Yawkey gave lots of money to inner 
city althetic leagues, and that it angered him when people spoke of the Red 
Sox as a racist organization.  My feeling is that if she had made these 
contributions public it could've gone a long way in repairing relations 
with the black community, and change the perception of the organization that 
black players have.  He then ragged on a Globe series done a while back 
about the Red Sox and racial issues, a series that I thought was fairly 
factual.  Whenever this team is bought, I doubt you'll see the payroll that 
it has now.  The cable television revenues, while good are nowhere near 
what the Yankees and Mets collect, and like Denny said somebody will be 
paying interest on the loan secured to buy the team.

				/Don
29.864AXIS::ROBICHAUDGreenwell talks, Roger balksThu Feb 27 1992 15:221
    So what's the E.T.A. for the "Petulant One" (i.e. Roger Clemens)?
29.865PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Feb 27 1992 15:243
29.866AXIS::ROBICHAUDGreenwell talks, Roger balksThu Feb 27 1992 15:271
    So I assume he's concluded his bartending duties at the Velvet Elvis?
29.867DEMING::MCKAYThu Feb 27 1992 15:5817
    Just saw a copy of the Red Sox schedule
    
    Opening day is on Monday April 13 vs. Baltimore
    Patriots day is on Monday April 20 vs. Toronto (I have my own tix Hawk)
    Yankees weekend series is the LAST weekend of the year Oct 2,3,4
    
    I have the weekend season deal and it's too bad the Yanks are coming to
    town so late in the year.  I suppose if the games actually meant
    something in October, but I figure the division will be locked up
    by the Sox in late September.....
    
    You have to love Toronto coming in for Patriots day followed by the 
    Marathon.  Sure to be a great day.
    
    Jimbo
    
    
29.868Reason fer not showin'...AKOCOA::PETERSONThu Feb 27 1992 16:144
    
    
    ....Rogers just mad cuz Elvis has his own stamp now and he doesn't.
    
29.869AXIS::ROBICHAUDMoVaughn-RogainePosterChildFri Feb 28 1992 13:035
    	Did Sid Fernandez and Mo Vaughn go to the same weight loss clinic? 
    And who's taking bets as to when His Royal Petulance will deign
    to grace Camp Butch with his presence?
    
    				/Don
29.870SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesFri Feb 28 1992 13:472
       During the interview he did on TV Wed. night he said 'next week'.
                                      Denny
29.871JARETH::YANKOWSKASMeghan is walking!Fri Feb 28 1992 14:007
    >	Did Sid Fernandez and Mo Vaughn go to the same weight loss clinic? 
    
    Guess we'll find out when the next round of Ultra-Slim Fast ads hits
    the airwaves.   :-)
    
    
    py
29.872PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Feb 28 1992 15:131
    Imagine that.  Mo lost 30 lbs. just by shaving his haid.  ;^)
29.873USCTR2::NAHEARNFri Feb 28 1992 15:4712
    Wade Boggs spent the winter working out in his new $30,000 gym he built
    in his home....came to camp with a noticeable change in upper body
    definition!!!!   Squarer (is that a word?) shoulders and slimmer waist.
    
    
    PARADE IN OCTOBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
29.874Still a lousy baserunner!!CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsFri Feb 28 1992 15:515
    So he cain hit the ball harder off the wall and git thrown out at
    first?
    
    MikeL
    
29.875BUCYK::ROBICHAUDFri Feb 28 1992 15:553
	I believe he's next in line to fight Greenteeth.

				/Don
29.876Parade in Oct.!!SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Mar 02 1992 10:353
       According to Gil Santos, Rocket checked into Chain o FLakes before 7
    this AM. Now we cain all sleep at night!
                                     Denny
29.877RUGBY1::wayHand me down my shootin' iron...Mon Mar 02 1992 11:1531
I can't remember where I read it (it could have been The Globe, because
I read that last week at training, or it could have been the Courant
on Saturday morning), but I read an article/editorial on the Red Sox and
ownership possibilities.

The one thing that stuck out to me was the fact that if a new owner does
buy the team, that Fenway Park will probably go the way of the dinosaur.
The writer said that Fenway, while a small ballpark, has a ton of character
and is a link to baseball's historic past.


Personally, I like Fenway.  The "ghosts" there are a lot more visible than
in other ballparks.  It's more like Field of Dreams, where the guys walked
out of the corn.

When I go to Fenway, I can feel Ted Williams there, or Carlton Fisk,
or Yaz.  I can remember Luis Tiant, with that crazy windup he had, or
Jim Lonborg in 1967....

I remember my Dad telling me how he went to Fenway, and telling me of
the Green Monster.  I remember him telling me how he wanted to take
me to a game there, and I remember when we finally did.  It's been something
I've always wanted to do when I have kids....  I hope it'll still be around.


I'd hate like hell to see them tear down Fenway.  I mean, so many of the
wonderful parks where they used to play the game are gone, or so blatantly
remodeled.....


'Saw
29.878AXIS::ROBICHAUDRogerWatch-Day10Mon Mar 02 1992 11:286
    	If that's true Denny, I can't wait for the reaction when His
    Royal Petulance goes to his locker!  The milk carton with his picture
    on it adds just the right touch.  What are the odds that the first
    team fight precedes the first spring training game?
    
    				/Don
29.879FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Mar 02 1992 11:3716
    'Saw, we all love Fenway but we have to face reality - it costs a lot
    of money in renovations to keep that place going.  Sooner or later
    (Peter Gammons predicts within 15 years), the place will have to be
    replaced.  Fenway works to the Red Sox advantage in a lot of ways -
    mostly because the small size forces people to buy tickets early.  On
    the other hand, it doesn't have the creature comforts a lot of stadiums
    have, it has no parking, it can be hard to get to (face it, there are
    a lot of folks who just don't like to take the T and prefer the
    convenience of driving in, even if they pay through the nose for it and
    sit in traffic for an hour) and it can't be expanded.  I've often
    thought and I still think the Red Sox have been quietly buying land
    over the years in preparation for building the new stadium they need.
    
    I agree with Gammons - Fenway will be gone eventually.
    
    John
29.880RUGBY1::wayHand me down my shootin' iron...Mon Mar 02 1992 12:115
It would be nice if they could preserve it somehow, as a historical
site....  It is one of the few "old" parks left....


'Saw
29.881PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Mar 02 1992 12:307
    I hear a reporter in USA Today is predicting that Sox will have a new
    home in downtown Boston in 5 years...
    
    Jeff Gray, the Sox reliever who suffered a stroke last season, is doing
    quite well and says he'll be back on the Sox before the end of the
    season.  Jeff's been throwing from a mound for a couple of months now
    and his velocity is in the 70's.
29.882How about turn it over to da Parks and Recreation Dept?7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Mon Mar 02 1992 12:4914
    MtM,
    
    Regarding your prediction of a new stadium in 5 years!
    
    Who you trying to jive anyway??????  If'n their lucky they MIGHT
    have a building permit!  The only thing that the PRM can do quicker
    is raise taxes!
    
    Pass me some of those 'schrooms.  I wanna fanticize too!
    
    I remain,
    cold stone sober (for Monday),
    Kev
    
29.883PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Mar 02 1992 12:537
29.884SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Mar 02 1992 13:164
       With the location of Fenway, if they move to a new park the place is
    history! The new owners, whoever they might be, won't be able to afford
    not selling the land Fenway's on to some developer.
                                  Denny
29.885look again (and don't edit it either!!!!!)7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Mon Mar 02 1992 13:379
    MtM,
    
    Ya didn't make *ANY* reference to a paper being the source.  You
    led me (us) to believe it was your PO&PB!
    
    I remain,
    easily misguided?,
    Kev
    
29.8867389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Mon Mar 02 1992 13:418
    
    OK. I'm wrong.  I admit it.  Sorry MtM,  It's my fault.  I didn't
    read it correctly.
    
    I remain,
    asking forgiveness,
    Kev
    
29.887AXIS::ROBICHAUDRogerWatch-Day10Mon Mar 02 1992 14:056
	Will poor Jody Reed be able to get over the hurt and trauma of 
being paid only 1.6 million dollars this year?  And will having to deal 
with this psychologically devastating problem affect his on-field 
performance?

				/Don
29.888CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsMon Mar 02 1992 14:347
    Gotta love what the Bosox practical jokers done to Roger's locker.
    Rumor has it that Greenwell set up his cassette/radio with Aretha
    Franklin's "RESPECT" in Jody's locker. 
    What a fun group (for now)
    
    MikeL
    
29.889better reserve me a rubber room!!USCTR2::NAHEARNMon Mar 02 1992 15:5610
    I expect Jody Reed to hit .285 and be a valuable contributor to the
    1992 World Champion RedSox.
    
    
    To qualify my position, I also think Matt Young will be a shining light
    this year!!!   :^)     
    
    
    Nelly
    
29.890His Highness doesn't believe in FUNCNTROL::CHILDSmake the right choice, TsongasMon Mar 02 1992 19:204
 Betcha Roger hires Mo Vaughn to kick Greenwall's butt for him......

 ;^)
29.891AXIS::CHAPPELFor DUTY and HUMANITYTue Mar 03 1992 13:1213
29.892Roger & me woulda been buddies in high school, '69-'73...SASE::SZABOTue Mar 03 1992 13:267
    Roger Clemens is a lot like (no, not rugby!) "pro" rasslin'.  Years
    ago, he was the poster boy good guy role model media darling.  Now,
    he's portrayed as the no good bad boy media rebel.  I used to hate the
    guy, now he's my hero.  Kinda like Jim McMahon...
    
    Hawk
    
29.893WWFSCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesTue Mar 03 1992 13:292
       Roger Clemens looks like the 'Mountie'!
                                        Denny
29.894RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 14:2119
I saw Super Fly Jimmy Snooka lasted night.  Boy has he changed....
Loved the song he used to (still?) comes out with....  Super, Super, Super Fly.


What ever happened to Ax and Smash....


What ever happened to Rick Derringer (from my hometown), you know,
Rock 'n Roll Hootchy Coo....


If Roger has been working out with Chuck Norris, does that mean he
is gonna throw a lot more beanballs this year?  Will John Marzano have
to come out and tackles batters like last year?  (btw, Marzano made an
EXCELLENT tackle that time).....



'Saw
29.895AXIS::ROBICHAUDThe ProdiROGERgal Son Returns!Tue Mar 03 1992 15:187
    	In the true Colonel Eagan/Ted Williams tradition, Globe writer
    Dan Shaughnessy has taken upon himself the enormous task of informing
    the paper's readers of what a blight on society, what a threat to
    everything good and wholesome, what a truly despicable human being
    Roger Clemens is.
    
    				/Don
29.896MCIS1::DHAMELForgot to cut my imbecilical cordTue Mar 03 1992 16:235
    
    > What ever happened to Rick Derringer
    
    He got loaded one night and was fired.
    
29.897RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 16:5221
Slasher, 

Do you mean that Col. Eagan used to tell everyone how bad Williams was?


Or do you mean that Williams has told everyone how bad Clemons is?



Dickstah!  Don't you be makin' fun of one of my homeys.....  (Actually, I 
never knew Derringer went to G-bury, except that they had a "home grown"
segment on a local station, and played some Derringer because he was from
town)....


		Rock and roll hootchy-coo, Lawdy mama light my fuse,
		Rock and roll hootchy-coo, truck on out and spread the news!



'Saw
29.898USCTR2::NAHEARNTue Mar 03 1992 17:1230
    re: a few back,
    
    Don (?),
    
    I was amazed/pissed to read Shaunessy's (sp?) column this morning!!
    He writes as if he's speaking for all of us in regards to our being
    owed an explanation and/or apology.  I can only speak for myself, but
    it is MHO that I am not owed an apology from Roger!!!  That he honored
    his contract and arrived 'in time' is alright with me!!  Given that his
    belated arrival was looked upon as showing up Hobson, his apology to
    Butch may have been warranted, but not to anyone else (except, perhaps 
    his teammates)!!
    
    The writer suggests that the player *OWES* the 'public' a peak inside
    his head......whereas I believe that the player owes the paying public
    an honest effort....and anything provided beyond that is icing!!!
    
    I pay to watch Clemons PITCH, and nothing else!!!!!  The fact that many
    consider him to be an *sshole does not bother me at all.....in fact it
    gives me and Roger something in common!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    Helps to Hurl,
    
    Nelly
    
    
    
    
    teammates).
29.899AXIS::ROBICHAUDThe ProdiROGERgal Son Returns!Tue Mar 03 1992 17:245
    	I think Eddie Anvilhaid's right.  A public whipping of Roger
    Clemens in Schaefer/Sullivan/Foxboro Stadium with the proceeds to
    go to the Jimmy Fund, and use a cat o' nine tails!
    
    				/Don
29.900Clemens wrong; but we got one vindictive media in BostonNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 03 1992 19:2847
    > In the true Colonel Eagan/Ted Williams tradition, Globe writer
    > Dan Shaughnessy has taken upon himself the enormous task of informing
    > the paper's readers of what a blight on society, what a threat to
    > everything good and wholesome, what a truly despicable human being
    > Roger Clemens is.
    
    [Reposted from RED_SOX conference]
    
    I must be missing something, because I didn't think Clemens' interview
    was all that bad.  Sure, it was chock full of the usual disconnected 
    speech fragments, but his responses to the questions (actually, more 
    like one question over and over: why didn't you call?) were easy 
    enough to understand.  Hell, the sitting President of the United States 
    more often than not manages to sound like a blathering idiot when he's 
    quoted verbatim.
    
    Here's an example of one of Shaughnessy's interpretations from the 
    interview:
    
    Clemens: "I think for me, being here and seeing what we got on our
              sleeve, I think that's basically the most important thing,
              about Mrs. Yawkey being gone... When the season gets started
              and things get under way it'll be great, but right now,
              again, we lost a big void in Boston with Mrs. Yawkey passing.
              That's what we were pressing so hard to win so just a part of
              their family could enjoy something.  And I'm kind of feeling 
              let down by that, we weren't able to do that..."
    
    Shaughnessy: It would be easy to raise objections when an inconsiderate
                 superstar uses the death of a beloved owner to take heat
                 off himself...
    
    It's pretty easy to see what's going on here.  Essentially, there are
    certain reporters in this town who will go to any lengths to run an
    imperfect athlete down.  Why did the Boston media allow a silly story 
    on Clemens' absence upstage the story of the passing of an era in Boston
    sports history?  Why is it considered objectionable for Clemens to
    speak his mind on Mrs. Yawkey (deliver a tribute actually) instead of
    answering the question about the phone call again and again and again?
    
    I completely understand why Roger Clemens refuses to speak to the
    media.
    
    glenn
    
                                      
29.901USCTR2::NAHEARNWed Mar 04 1992 11:1017
    After entering my reply yesterday, I looked at Shaughnessy's article
    again and realized my error.....it was not Shaughnessy's Globe article,
    but rather Michael Gee's Herald article that I had read which really
    pissed me off!!  Did anyone out there read Gee's column yesterday?
    If so, did you think he came off as speaking for everyone?  He seemed
    to think that he and the rest of us deserved an apology from Clemens
    for his late arrival!!  *I* certainly need no apology from Clemens...he
    did nothing to *ME*!!  His tardiness is between him and his coach and
    teammates.....who do members of the media think they are that they are
    owed an apology for his being late?
    
    
    Gee's column was a perfect example of the media's iflated image of
    their self-worth.
    
    
    Nelly
29.902SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 04 1992 11:124
       Some of the TV reporters down there were steamed because they were
    supposed to come home before last weekend and had to stay a few extra
    days waiting for His Lateness.
                                    Denny
29.903Red Sox controversy - the '92 seasonHYDRA::HAUSRATHBearCATS &gt;&gt;&gt; BuckeyesWed Mar 04 1992 11:1412
    
    Nelly, maybe the jist of it is that Roger's late arrival is being
    viewed by the Herald writer as a lack of effort... if this is the 
    case, then he owes an appology to the people who pay his salary.. 
    namely, the Boston fans.  
    
    These overpaid cry-babies don't need our sympathy or protection..  for
    the money they make they deserve every bit of heat they take (maybe
    more).  For the good of the team, Roger should have been in camp on 
    time! 
    
    /Jeff  
29.904His paycheck doesn't warrant any fanasskissing...SASE::SZABOWed Mar 04 1992 11:566
    For the good of his highly respectable bad boy image, I'm glad Roger
    showed when he did, and kinda disappointed that he didn't wait a little
    longer...
    
    Hawk
    
29.905It's the rag, not the writer.TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna be a sister!!!Wed Mar 04 1992 12:158
I saw some of the Gee column (I'd never BUY the Herald, I just read Mike Leary's
sometimes).

I kinda feel bad for Gee.  I think he is a competant journalist, but since he
writes for the Herald, he has to pull hatchet jobs like this to sell newspapers.
Kinda like the reason Phil and Oprah talk about sex all the time.

=Bob=
29.906Gee whizzesCTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsWed Mar 04 1992 12:171
    
29.907PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 04 1992 12:276
29.908PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Mar 04 1992 12:297
    Roger has been named the starting pitcher for the Sox Grapefruit League
    opener against the Tigers on Saturday.  Viola gets the start on Sunday. 
    Each is expected to go 3 innings.
    
    Jeff, you can say alot of things about Roger Clemens (Mike C. has said
    most of them), but one thing that can't be said is that he shows a lack
    of effort.
29.909AXIS::ROBICHAUDYouDownWithRichieHebner?Wed Mar 04 1992 12:455
    	I don't think an apology is enough.  How about a week in leg
    irons?  Or maybe he has to pitch the entire exhibition season with
    a scarlet number.
    
    				/Don
29.910SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 04 1992 12:473
       We noticed Dickstah wasn't wearing Rocket's number on his shirt
    lasted night. Musta been his own way of protesting.
                                    Denny
29.911RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsWed Mar 04 1992 13:014
I think Roger needs a little session with Pepper and "Purple Rain" to
get his big main's ego in check.....8^)

'Saw
29.912CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsWed Mar 04 1992 13:0713
    This Clemens thang is way overblown. So the guy's a balloonheaded
    jerk. If he apologized to Hobson it's between them, He don't owe me
    squat. The man comes ready to pitch. He'll perform and get his near
    20 wins or so. I might think he's a vacuum-brain personally, but
    give me his right arm and work ethic anyday.
    
    Now Boggs is anudder story. louigi boorman musta coughed up his
    12-aig breakfast when he heard Chicken man stating that the 28 million
    that Sandberg received were "within his parameters" Haw Haw. Mortgage
    the farm, babeee, or trade the dude or let him fly the coop.. 
    
    MikeL
     
29.913EARRTH::BROOKSSoftware : Art Of The StateWed Mar 04 1992 13:151
    Am I the only guy to notice that Butch Hobson walks like a pansy ?
29.914AXIS::ROBICHAUDYouDownWithRichieHebner?Wed Mar 04 1992 13:213
    	No Way MikeL!  I'm a fan and I want my pound of flesh!
    
    				/Don
29.915Viola will be the ACE by July....CNTROL::CHILDSThe SYSTEM has spung a leakWed Mar 04 1992 13:329
>    	No Way MikeL!  I'm a fan and I want my pound of flesh!
    
    				/Don


 I hear he's got plenty to spare /Don......especially between the ears!!!

 ;^)
29.916RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGetting Rich: The United WayWed Mar 04 1992 13:4311
    Re Michael Gee 
    
    I liked him when he first started out - he wrote the sports column for
    "B.A.D." better known as the Phoenix.  Really great stuff he wrote back
    then.  Methinks the Herald was able to offer more money, and
    opportunity, for a sports wrtier, then the Phoenix did - and he
    probably has to satisfy the sports editorial policy of the Herald.  He
    had talent.  I haven't seen his stuff in years, but it sounds like he's
    regressed.
    
    JD
29.917Dare you to knock that Duracell off Butch's shoulder...SASE::SZABOWed Mar 04 1992 13:456
    > Am I the only guy to notice that Butch Hobson walks like a pansy ?
    
    No, Dock, there are plenty of other limp-wristed guys that have noticed
    what you have...  :-o
    
    
29.918RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsWed Mar 04 1992 13:4812
He may walk like a pansy, but his wife is pretty hot.


He's a nice guy too.  Used to manage in New Britsky, and would always
stop and chat if you caught him when he wasn't too busy.


I hope he does well.....
Can't do any worse than some others....


'Saw
29.919SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 04 1992 13:584
      Anyone notice when Rocket and Butch had their little jogging chat
    that Roger still had his walkmain on? Probably never heard a word
    Hobson said.
                                   Denny
29.920But he cain pitch!CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsWed Mar 04 1992 14:133
    HAHA Denny,
    Was the audio version of "How to win Friends and Influence People"
    
29.921SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Wed Mar 04 1992 15:0428
    Re back a few:
    
    Was the writer REALLY on the pulse of the fans, or did the media cause
    the pulse to quicken, with it's never ending crap about a guy not
    showing up early?
    
    I know I'm generalizing, but I can't stand Boston writers.  Or even
    some of the writers on the local rag.  Every one of these guys is an
    expert.  They all know what has to be done.  But, for some strange
    reason, NONE of them play the game at the pro level, never mind the
    BIGS.  Craig Mustard is a prime example of the airway version of this
    type of "reporting".  What an egotistical jerk. 
    
    All I ever seen to read or hear is that the "local team" must win it
    all.  Never mind if they have the horses or not, that's a management
    problem.  Never mind that a backbone type of player may get hurt, it
    was either his fault for playing when he shouldn't have, or he took a
    chance he shouldn't have, or the manager should have known that he
    might get hurt, or the general manager didn't have an adequate backup
    available.  Day after day, sport after sport.  It really has taken away
    a lot of the fun I used to have when following sports.  
    
    As soon as I had heard the very first report about Clemens not being in
    camp, I just knew that it would be blown totally out of proportion.
    
    Ho hum, same crap, different day.
    
    lEe
29.922RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGetting Rich: The United WayWed Mar 04 1992 15:2110
    Lee -
    
    Hey, quit that bashing of Boston, or Mac will get really mad at you.
    
    Geez, I'm sick of all you guys bashing Boston, and the Boston papers,
    and the Boston pitchers.
    
    ~/~
    
    JD
29.923RUGBY1::wayKO: we're 2 legit 2 quitWed Mar 04 1992 15:277
JD,

We've never bashed a pitcher as long as it was full of beer....


hth,
'Saw
29.924AXIS::ROBICHAUDYouDownWithRichieHebner?Wed Mar 04 1992 15:285
    	I agree Lee about Craig Mustard, he doesn't quite cut it.  He
    tries to spice up his show with sensationalism, but in my opinion
    he's yellow.
    
    				/Don
29.925CELTIK::JACOBdan'l ain't getting near MY daughterWed Mar 04 1992 15:295
    re.923
    did drain QUITE a few lasted night, though, eh Saw??
    
    JaKe
    
29.926you're a GAS, Slash!CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsWed Mar 04 1992 15:311
    
29.927;-)RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGetting Rich: The United WayWed Mar 04 1992 15:517
    Slash -
    
    I hear he's a real hot dog, but some folks just think he's a weiner.  I
    wouldn't relish having to listen to him, that's for sure.  He should
    quit while he's on a roll...
    
    JD
29.928You can't believe every thing you read, especially in BostonNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 04 1992 16:0027
    
    I think you missed Lee's point, JD.  With apologies due for maybe
    overgeneralizing a bit, I think in order of priority you've bashed the 
    Boston fans, then the Boston management and players, and maybe 
    lastly the Boston sports media.  I would also definitely have to put 
    the Boston sports media at the top of my own hit list (with exceptions
    made for a few real journalists-- or the closest a sports reporter can
    come to that-- like Peter Gammons).  I've never seen anything like it 
    in any other city I've lived in or visited.  New York might match the 
    Boston sports media for sensationalism, but definitely not for the 
    level of sarcasm and vindictiveness.  
    
    I think that in a lot of ways the Boston sports media has distorted the
    real feelings of a large number of fans.  Boston Red Sox fans are 
    always stereotyped as whining, cynical complainers who refuse to 
    appreciate the general success of the franchise over the last 25 years
    (I for one am appreciative, championship or not).  They are taken to 
    task for it by the national media.  While obviously a lot of that 
    bitterness does exist, why is there hardly a mention of summer after 
    summer of a sold-out Fenway Park full of diehard fans, many full of 
    hope or out enjoying themselves just the same.  Yet those fans are 
    usually portrayed as fatalistic masochists who just can't help
    themselves.  It makes for great copy, but from what I've experienced
    firsthand it just ain't the total truth...
    
    glenn
       
29.929Kielbasa this !EARRTH::BROOKSSoftware : Art Of The StateWed Mar 04 1992 16:156
    re .927
    
    JD, let's just say that Slash is ain't a weenie ...
    
    
    Pigs in a blanket comes to mind ... :-)
29.930RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsWed Mar 04 1992 16:3015
I'm not familiar with the Boston Media.


Is the sensationalism you mention found in what should be factual reporting,
or in their editorializing.


In the Hartford Courant, there are factual pieces and then commentary/editorial
type columns.  The editorial columns can be quite controversial (if one
reads the letters to the SPORTSeditor)....

I just wondered how it's done up there....


'Saw
29.931Boston Papers have no obhective reportingTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna be a sister!!!Wed Mar 04 1992 17:2614
There is very little "straight reporting" in the Boston papers.  Even the game
stories are laced with writer's opinions and prejudices.  I suspect that the 
Boston papers do this to compete with each other and to differentiate themselves
from local rags.  I agree that in most of the big city newspapers I have read,
you do not get this to the degree you have it in Boston.

I read the Courant (a newspaper named after a spice, hmmm), and the 
Providence Journal as often as I get a chance to, and there is no comparison
in the level of non-editorialized reporting.  

I personally would like to read a straight account of the game (or skip it if I
watched the game), and then read a column about it with editorial content.

=Bob=
29.932RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGetting Rich: The United WayWed Mar 04 1992 17:3912
    Glenn.
    
    Nice note.  My note to Lee, I thought, was a fairly obvious joke.
    
    Should have put the smiley in.
    
    And complain all you want about teh Globe sports writers - compared to
    most papers I've read - they are a lot better.  The guy who used to do
    hockey - Rosa - was the absolute worst though.  He blamed every Bruins
    loss on the refs.
    
    JD
29.933RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsWed Mar 04 1992 17:5919
I heard someone mention on a sporting show that the Hartford Courant
is the oldest continuous daily in the US.

It's not a bad paper.  Recently they've taken a very pro-Weicker stand, which
bugs me a bit, but on the whole, they're good.

There Sports staff in my mind has always been exemplary, going back to 
Bill Lee (whom I started reading in the Late Sixties).  His column was called
"Grist From the Mill" and his slogan was "With Malice Towards None" and that's
the way he editorialized.

I am really hooked on the separation of factual reports and editorials.


Courant (not a spice, Lindsey's Dad ;^)) is think comes from the same route
as currier or something like that....


'Saw
29.934RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGetting Rich: The United WayWed Mar 04 1992 18:0310
    Saw -
    
    I used to go out with a girl who worked at the Courant.  Reason I know
    Hartford so good.  ANyway, the Courant, is the oldest continuous daily,
    and it owned by the same folks who one the L.A. Times.  They have (had)
    a decent profit-sharing/bonus system.  She used to get a bonus at
    Christmas time equal to 6 weeks of pay.   I always managed to visit her
    that weekend ;-)
    
    JD
29.935SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 04 1992 18:062
       I think a courant is a fruit, no?
                                       Denny
29.936RUGBY1::wayKO says &quot;We're 2 legit 2 quit&quot;Wed Mar 04 1992 18:066
Well, now that you're married and all, if she still works there do you
have her number????

8^)

'Saw
29.937RUGBY1::wayKO says &quot;We're 2 legit 2 quit&quot;Wed Mar 04 1992 18:078
Yeah, the fruit is spelled currant.


Since the paper started in 17** something, it's probably one of them 
colonial type words no one uses anymore except MrT when he's on a roll....


'Saw
29.938There's good and bad but the criticisms can get petty..NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 04 1992 18:1740
    
    > Nice note.  My note to Lee, I thought, was a fairly obvious joke.
    
    I know you were joking, but there's an essence of truth to the Boston
    fan-bashing, so I just made reference to it as different from Boston 
    media-bashing.  No big deal; it wasn't the point of my response to 
    debate you on the matter, but rather to give my thoughts on the Boston 
    sports media as a Boston sports fan.  I think the perception of the 
    attitudes of each as one and the same is wrong.  I think there are more 
    level-headed, appreciative sports fans in Boston than is generally 
    accepted.
    
    > And complain all you want about teh Globe sports writers - compared to
    > most papers I've read - they are a lot better.
    
    I agree.  It's strange, but I do find the Boston Globe sports pages to
    be worth reading most of the time, because as far as sportswriters go 
    most of them aren't bad writers, and in spite of the common accusation 
    of Boston provincialism they do provide fairly comprehensive national
    coverage compared to the papers I've read in comparably sized cities.  
    Basically I object to a lot of the messages within the medium but not
    the medium itself, but even then not without exception.  I actually 
    like Bob Ryan-- I think he can think freely without his knee jerking 
    simultaneously (even if I don't agree with him on something), he 
    writes fairly well and he's even been known to blast the Red Sox 
    beat writers and the pessimistic fan on the street for their constant 
    whining and crying.  I think both Ryan and Peter Gammons are honest 
    about what they're writing rather than just holding their noses to 
    make a buck for the paper, and the difference is noticed.
    
    On the other hand, the TV sports guys, maybe without exception (I'm
    undecided on Mike Lynch, who usually shows some decency but with the
    occasional relapse from time to time) are smarmy, know-it-all cynics
    with no apparent function other than to botch scores, show goofy
    highlights, and deliver ridiculous commentary.  I credit Bob Lobel as
    the father of this unappealing genre of "news" reporting.  Thank god 
    for SportsCenter...
    
    glenn
    
29.939AXIS::ROBICHAUDYouDownWithRichieHebner?Wed Mar 04 1992 18:206
29.940Yup, Clark Booth was too good for sports (and got out)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 04 1992 18:281
    
29.941CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsWed Mar 04 1992 18:297
    On occasion I enjoy John Dennis. He can be a journalist first,
    smarmy entertainer second, when he has to (unlike jerky but likeable
    Lobel).
    I liked Jack Edwards when he was here.
    
    MikeL
    
29.942You dat old Waugamain?AXIS::ROBICHAUDYouDownWithRichieHebner?Wed Mar 04 1992 18:301
    
29.943NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 04 1992 18:339
    
    >                      -< You dat old Waugamain? >-
    
    Nah, but I've seen Booth wax eloquent on sports before so I'm using my
    imagination a little bit.  Sort of like how I daydream about how things
    must have been when Upton Bell was in charge of a football team... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.944CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsWed Mar 04 1992 18:374
    Dadgum youngsters
    I remember when Eddie Anvilhaid had his own TV show (wif the other
    Huddlers) in the early 70's
    
29.945Ding and DongSCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 04 1992 18:443
       Hey! Upton Bell drafted John Hannah. The man's a jeanyus!
       Remeber Bob Lobell and Upton Bell's radio show? 
                                      Denny
29.946NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 04 1992 18:4911
    >   Hey! Upton Bell drafted John Hannah. The man's a jeanyus!
    
    True, and he did a pretty good job as a player personnel man with my
    old Baltimore Colts, too.  I just can't figure out if Upton Bell is an
    old guy who looks young or a young guy who's been living too much of 
    the hard life.  He's kind of a goof now, but I've heard less funny 
    sports people...
    
    glenn
    
29.947CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsWed Mar 04 1992 18:504
    Yup, preceded by "I know everything,you know jacks#&t" Guy Maniella
    
    MikeL
    
29.948SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 04 1992 18:542
       I liked Guy, wish he was still on. 
                                     Denny
29.949COBRA::BRYDIEJulie's in the Drug SquadWed Mar 04 1992 18:5910
    Well, smack my crack and call me a homer but for my money the
   Globe has the best Sunday sports page I've read, especially now 
   that Gammons is back. McMullan is a bit weak as the basketball
   writer (Ryan was better) but Borges is a fine boxing writer, he
   also handles football quite well. McDonough is an excellent football 
   writer and Shaugnessy and Madden are passable columnists. The rest of
   the staff is pretty good too. As for the Globe's rival the Herald you 
   couldn't make me read it.
    
29.950SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 04 1992 19:066
      The Globe wins national awards all the time for it's sports page. I
    agree with most of what you said Tommy, but Borges always seems to have
    a chip on his shoulder. He hates Mike Tyson. and because of his
    exposing the Pats' drug problems has had trouble with them.
    
                                    Denny
29.951And the bias gets bigger when he's on a national platformLUNER::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Wed Mar 04 1992 19:539
    re .938
    
    Glenn, we'll have to agree to disagree on Bob Cryin' ("bout the
    Celtics) of the Globe.
    
    He is such a Celtics apologist, that if old Red Aurbach (sp) had a
    Minister of Propaganda, Ryan would be it.
    
    Doc
29.952Would that be the guy who says Magic is the best ever?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 04 1992 19:551
    
29.953If he did, I suspect he was in C.M.A. mode ...LUNER::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Wed Mar 04 1992 20:0715
    If so Glenn, he's *very* reluctantly jumping on the bandwagon. 

    Because a few years back in Dick Vitale's mag (the equiv. of Maz's
    baseball preview, and Don Heinrich's football preview), Bird was the
    best, and no one in the same time zone. I think Russell got 2nd, and
    Magic was 4th or 7th.

    Ryan's comment was that Magic "was one of the few who was on the same
    wavelength as Bird."

    He also ranked Bill Walton as the greatest center of all time. I think
    Russell was next in his all-important opinion, then the rest of the herd.

    Hell, if I had worn Celtic green, he probably would have ranked me
    among the top point guards ...
29.954SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu Mar 05 1992 10:0940
    For some reason, the Sunday edition of the Globe does seem to be more
    objective than the daily.  I don't know why, it just seems that way to
    me.
    
    Another aspect of media that gets to me are the call-in shows.  Sure,
    there are some very good callers, but I get so damn tired of guys
    calling in with their idea of a great trade.  Doesn't matter what sport
    or what team, they've got some unbelievable trade in mind.  And the
    host very often gets sidetracked into discussing that trade and his own
    version.  If it was so damn easy, how come no one has figured it out to
    the point that his team is a constant champion, year after year?  Sure,
    there have been dynasties, but not lately, and that was back when there
    weren't the drafts we now have.  Money was a big part of the old method
    of getting players, as was territorial rights.  It's a different
    business now.
    
    In talking to everyday fans, such as Sox fans, I often hear the
    optimistic view as the training camp goes into gear, and it stays on
    thru the season if the Sox are in contention.  I don't hear the
    negative crap nearly as often as I would expect to hear it, based on
    the media accounts.  
    
    Take the situation with Boggs.  I heard radio reports that BIG trouble
    is on the horizon in regards to his new contract.  That he puts himself
    on the same level as Ryne Sanderson, or even above.  You know, worth
    the same, some 7+M$ a year.  Well, I didn't read the same thing in one
    paper, I read where he said something to the effect that it gives him
    more range to play with.  While I completely agree that players are
    making too much money for what they do (some players, anyway), it's the
    Chi owners fault.  They skipped right over the 6M$ figure, which no one
    has made to date.  The highest was 5+M$ before this latest signing. 
    What the h*ll is the matter with these so-called businessmen?
    
    As to the players, What they get isn't really any of my business, but
    if it's publicized, then I've got the right to be very critical when
    one of them carps about being treated badly, like Jody Reed.  Trade
    places with me Jody, for just 1 year.  I'll be financially set for
    life, and you just might realize what a racket you've got.
    
    lEe
29.955MCIS1::DHAMELForgot to cut my imbecilical cordThu Mar 05 1992 12:0717
    
    Right now I don't see Boggs being on the Sox roster next year, as I
    don't see the Sox ready to offer him anywhere near what he's hinting
    at.  I get the impression that Boggs feels he's underpaid, and the only
    way he's going to know for sure is by testing the open market.
    
    Before it's all over, Wade will wind up being PO'd at the Sox and sign
    elsewhere even if they match the best offer.
    
    I'm a Wade fan, and it would be nice to see him finish his career here,
    but I'm afraid there's another team that will give this 36 year old a
    four or five year contract for $4 or $5 million or so.  If I were Sox
    management I wouldn't do it, so "S'long Wade, it's been good to know
    ya."
    
    Dickstah
    
29.956At least they got rid of Charlie PierceCTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsThu Mar 05 1992 12:1817
    One thing I respected about Boggs was his choice in not bitching about
    the relative low pay scale he was at. He negotiated a contract and
    stuck by its terms even when lesser players passed him by. As he said
    a contract is a contract. I think that will be in his favor during
    new contract talks.
    
    Regarding the Herald, Steve Bulpett is a respected journalist covering
    the Celtics. I also enjoy Gerry Callahan's irreverent slants on
    occasion. I used to like Mike Shalin's and Karen Guregian's work, but
    what the hail happened to them?? The rest are mere shallow fluff,
    including the worst journalist (if you want to call him that),
    I've ever read (cringe!), Joe Fitzgerald. Bake this cake Joe, and
    I hope Mr. Fugi bodyslams ya!
    
    MikeL
     
    
29.957USCTR2::NAHEARNThu Mar 05 1992 13:1015
    FYI.....
    
    Wade Boggs is 33 years old.  He has stated that he intends to play 6 or
    7 more years.....and his agent says that a Sox offer of $5M/year would
    be in the ballpark they're looking for!!!
    
    Boggs has been very fair in his contract dealings with the Sox in the
    past....and as was stated earlier, he has never cried 'renegotiation'
    once in his career.  I'd personally be bummed if he didn't finish his
    career in Boston!!  Do I think that the Sox' management will, in my
    opinion, do the right thing.....NO!!  But then again, I thought they
    would have screwed up long before this and lost him already!!!
    
    
    Nelly
29.958MCIS1::DHAMELForgot to cut my imbecilical cordThu Mar 05 1992 13:2416
    
    > Boggs has been very fair in his contract dealings with the Sox in the
    > past....and as was stated earlier, he has never cried 'renegotiation'
    
    And I laud him for his stand on this.  Funny though, how "integrity"
    and "doing the right thing" is such an out-of-the-ordinary thing
    these days that some players feel they have to be rewarded even more
    for simply doing what they're suposed to do.  This isn't a knock on
    Boggs, though, just an observation of baseball business in general.
    I tend to side with management when a player walks out of the office
    thinking he Melvined management on a long term contract, then cries 
    'foul' a year down the road when his salary doesn't bring him the
    proper 'respect.'
    
    Dickstah
    
29.959PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Mar 06 1992 15:5215
29.960SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesTue Mar 31 1992 15:012
       Socks just waived Dana Keicker(sp?).
                                     Denny
29.961SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Tue Mar 31 1992 16:073
    Too bad he doesn't play football, the Pats could use another Keicker.
    
    lEe
29.962Well, that must be it for the rest of the season!7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Wed Apr 01 1992 12:4918
    
    
    OK all you sinners, better repent and do all the right religious stuff.
    The end of the world is at hand!!!
    
    Ya wanna know how *I* came to be blessed with this information?  Why
    it's quite simple,
    
    	Matt Young pitched SIX (6) innings of shutout baseball yesterday!
    
    
    
    Methinks we'd all better drop to our knees RIGHT NOW!!!!!!
    
    I remain,
    looking for a place of worship,
    Kev
    
29.963SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 01 1992 12:563
       Slasher's been trying to tell us all along that (Door)Matt Young
    would come around!
                                      Denny
29.964OuchSHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 01 1992 13:0715
 The other night, ESPN did an "Oscars" thing and invented some new names
 for some movies about baseball.  "The Prince Of Slides", "Deer Strikes
 Out" and so on.   Best one was ...
 
                  "The Hunt For The Red Sox In October"
 
 Priceless.
 
 Bob Hunt
 
 P.S.  SportsChannel NY replayed 1986 Game 6 lasted night as part of the
 "Greatest Games Ever Played" series.   Ouch, that was painful to watch
 again.   You kept hoping that this time Schiraldi would get the third
 strike but noooooooooooo ... Tough to watch and I'm not even a diehard Sox
 fan.
29.965Please, stop using that S-word! (Calvin S@#$%^%%^)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 01 1992 13:111
    
29.966CAMONE::WAYShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Wed Apr 01 1992 13:2015
Dammit Bob, 

I'm bleeding again.  The scar opened up and you'd swear I've got stigmata...

Hang on, I've got to get a Kleenex to soak up some of this blood....


Happens every time someone mentions that S-word, or the B-word....



Damn, gonna need more stitches!


'Saw
29.967SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 01 1992 13:212
       I thought the s-word was (S)tanley.
                                      Denny
29.968SALEM::DODAClinton: Stoner with a bonerWed Apr 01 1992 14:545
Bob,

This spring "Silence of the Bats" would be appropriate.

daryll
29.969Nah....It can't be for realSALES::THILLWed Apr 01 1992 16:543
    I heard that bit on Matt Young pitching 6 innings og shutout ball, but
    it was laced with so many other improbables that I figured that it was
    another April Fool's collij prank
29.970FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 01 1992 17:097
    Schiraldi set up Stanley for the disaster.  McNamara never should have
    pulled Clemens and he should have started Boyd in the 7th game.
    
    It kills me to even think about it.  I seriously thought about tossing
    my TV out the window that night.
    
    John
29.971The Can probably should have been first out of the pen, thoughNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 01 1992 17:1513
    
    > Schiraldi set up Stanley for the disaster.  McNamara never should have
    > pulled Clemens and he should have started Boyd in the 7th game.
    
    Everyone says this in hindsight, but I wanted Hurst out there for Game
    7 and he actually did a pretty good job.  He tired in the sixth after
    pitching five shoutout innings and the Sox brought in that damn S%^%^&&^ 
    person again to blow his umpteenth game of the postseason.  Would the 
    bullpen have held up better for the Oil Can?  Would Oil Can have given 
    up no more than two runs over 7+ innings?  We'll never know...
    
    glenn
    
29.972Bring Can in from the penSALES::THILLWed Apr 01 1992 17:298
    Well, what was wrong with bringing in the Can out of the bullpen to
    pitch the rest of Game 7 after Hurst got tired? If you remember, Boyd 
    was supposed to start game 7, but it was rained out, and by the
    following day, Hurst was rested enough to pitch. I can't argue with
    that, but you gotta feel for the Can having a chance to pitch game 7
    take away.
    
    Tom
29.973NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 01 1992 17:529
    
    I agree, Tom, Boyd should have had a shot before that procession of
    misfits got the call (as indicated in my reply title).  Still, there's
    no way you could deny Hurst the ball to start that game with the
    postseason he'd had.  By contrast, in Boyd's only Series start, he'd
    been hammered badly...
    
    glenn
    
29.974Enough AlreadyRDOVAX::BRAKEWed Apr 01 1992 17:5727
    No, No NOOO!!
    
    It was that big fat slob Gedman who should have been charged with a
    passed ball and who had no idea HOW to calm Schiraldi down. That tub of
    lard is the reason we lost. 
    
    Can you see if Fisk or Pena or even Sammy White or Bob Tillman would
    have been catching? They woulda been out there calming the kid down.
    But not Twinkie-king Gedman!! 
    
    The other culprit was MacNamara. He had no logical reason to keep a
    one-legged 1st baseman on the field with a lead in the 9th. He had used
    Stapleton all year as a late inning replacement. His stupidity rivals
    the use of Butch (Throw the ball in the Dugout) Hobson in the thick of
    a pennant race by that master of bonehaid moves, Zipperhead.
    
    Schiraldi had 1/2 season worth of major leagure experience. The kid was
    responsible for even getting the Sox into the Series. Bob Stanley was
    one of the classiest guys ever to play for the Sox. Bill Buckner,
    though an arrogant, self-centered clown, was a heck of an offensive
    threat.
    
    Talk about handling pitchers by MacNamara is an oxymoron. He won
    despite his incompetence. 
    
    Rich
    
29.975It's healthy to get it all out... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 01 1992 18:2026
    
    Nah, you're all messed up, Rich. ;-)  The Potato Head wasn't on the top
    of his game that night, to be sure, but he's taken a bum rap from the
    Legion of Bob Stanley Apologists (LBSA) all these years.  First off, he 
    had nothing to do with S%^$%##%$'s lack of success in Game 6.  S%^%^%$%% 
    had been in there way too long.  How many closers do you know of who go 
    a full three innings, 50+ pitchers in an outing?  Yet the ultimate 
    Non-Thinking Man's Manager McNamara allowed him to give up three 
    consecutive sharp hits before figuring out that the game wasn't over 
    yet.
    
    Secondly, this mass delusion causing the LBSA to blame Gedman for 
    allowing a wild pitch and sticking poor, poor Bob Stanley with the goat 
    horns because it supposedly should have been scored a passed ball is a 
    lot of nonsense.  How many times do you see a catcher set up outside and
    then the pitcher almost hits the batter with the ball (Mookie did a
    great job just getting out of the way!)?  Face it, Stanley had the 
    chicken bone firmly lodged and was badly in need of the Heimlich.  After 
    the game, he said the ball "just didn't feel right" in his hand.  He,
    like Schiraldi, was obviously fogged in by the pressure...  
    
    Thirdly, Gedman had a pretty damn good postseason.  No Gedman in the
    1986 ALCS, no trip to the World Series.  Look it up!
    
    glenn
    
29.976CAMONE::WAYShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Wed Apr 01 1992 18:2212
I don't know if it's in this conference or not, (ie this iteration of
SPORTS) but I sure would love to see that note JD put in again
about the Bus coming into Boston and all the kids having the nightmares
and the old men yelling "Throw the ball"....

I don't remember if it's in here or not.


Still have that JD????


'Saw
29.977SHALOT::MEDVIDtwisting in the waterWed Apr 01 1992 18:245
    Boy, this one is better than the one pulled on Saw!  Bob Hunt enters
    one sentence about 1986 and you guys get April Fooled into reliving
    your worst nightmare.  Too funny.
    
    	--dan'l
29.978Something bad happened in 1986?AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhWed Apr 01 1992 18:271
    
29.979You talking about this, Saw?RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOAnybody but the DukiesWed Apr 01 1992 18:28102
              <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 29.675                  The Boston Red Sox Note                  675 of 977
RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "From Here To Eternity"            95 lines   2-OCT-1991 11:17
                            -< The End Is near... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    STAGE:   Somewhere on the Mass Turnpike.   A long, king-of-the-road,
    touring bus, with tinted windows, and gothic paintings on the side
    hurtles down the freeway - flashing its lights at any import or
    domestic that dares to get in its way.  It blares its horn at trucks,
    which obediently get out of the way.  State troopes look the other way,
    knowing that they can do nothing to stop this rambling vehicle.
    
    It cruises past Sturbridge and Westborough - causing folks to feel a
    strange coolness sweep their body.  Those foolhearty to stare at the
    riveted behemoth get a glimpse of the destination sign:
    
         "EXPRESS:  FENWAY PARK"
    
    It rampages steadily, always heading east.  And folks in towns it
    hurtles by swear they hear orchestral strains and the sounds of a diva
    warming up "LA LA LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LAAAAAAAAA"
    
    The crescendo gets louder the close to Landsdowne street it gets.  At
    the Natick tollbooths, the bus flashes its lights, blares its horns,
    and the booth collector only gets a glimpse of the driver.  He looks
    vaguely familiar, a rotund man, with 'Babe' stitched across his breast
    pocket.   A faded poster for the opening of "No No Nanette" can barely
    be seen through the windows.
    
    Inside the bus, a fever pitch is developing.  The star is still warming
    up - exercising her sizeable lungs.  Her manager, Bucky, jokes with
    Enos, the wardrobe man, and Bill, the accountant.  "Love Beantown,"
    Bucky guffaws..."It's the one steady gig this chic has - nothing after
    this til we hit Madison Square in May! Haw!" 
    "LALALALALALAAAAALADEEDAAAAAAA!!!!!!!" the lady bellows.
    
    The bus rolls through the outlying 'burbs of Boston - like a metal
    apolyptic horseman.  Grandfathers suddenly sit straight up and say
    "Throw the Ball!  THrow the Ball!  He can't score from FIRST!!!"
    Their sons and daughters scream "Get up Luis, GET UP!"   Their sons and
    daughers cry "Jim WIlloughby!"  and thier children spit up and wet
    their beds, chanting 'Buckner, Buckner, Buckner'
    
    A shrill laughter fills the night, as the bus of doom slams into
    Beantown.  In her mansion, the owner feels the prescense of her
    husband, his mournful cries startling her - she glances at the calander
    - OCTOBER - it sneers back at her.  "She's back again, Tom" the old
    lady trembles...
    
    In Kenmore Square, everything moves at a slower speed.  A dark cloud
    obscures the stars.  No animals move, rats and pigeons holed up until
    the inevitable passes.   The faithful file in, feeling strangely
    germanic and lethargic.  In the clubhouse, the Ol' Towne Team wears a
    collective grimace.  
    
    The Bus hurtles down Beacon Street, the noise too much for people to
    take.  The lady keeps warming up, the bus driver blares his horn.  The
    road crew opens the windows to laugh at the cowering masses "Poor
    schmucks" Bucky roars.....A chant that sounds like "Eupheus, Eupheus"
    can be heard....a cruel mocking chant.  
    
    Those with strong stomachs see the vanity license plate "1918" 
    A block from the destination, Babe starts laughing - hey guys - those
    spirits are going to try to stop us again - "Won't those poor souls
    EVER learn!!!"  A ghostly collection of ex-Sox and fans form a human
    chain, trying to stop the bus - but they freeze when they see the 
    name of the bus, emblazoned in Yankee Blue "Frazee"
    
    The bus rolls right over a sausage vendor.  The doors open.  The
    entourage gets out, slowly rolling a red carpet, which fits right
    through the legs of Bill.  The star slowly steps down, with
    a Toronto batting helmet on, a Genuine Bill Buckner autographed glove,
    Enos Slaughter's spikes, and a variety of other articles of clothing.
    
    Inside the park, the announcer asks everyone "To Please Stand...."
    But just as the strains of the National Anthem are about to start, a
    huge booming of drums cuts it off.  The lights in the stadium dim.  A 
    spotlight hits the top of the Green Monster, and 36,000 souls gasp -
    the
    FAT LADY has arrived....She belts out one last LALALALAAAAALADEEEDA...
    The glass protecting the 600 Club cracks.....
    
      And to the tune of the "Hallejuh Chorus", she belts out this year's 
      rendition ....
    
    
      "OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER, FORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOX
       OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER,
    WAITTILNEXTYEARWAITTILNEXTYEARWAAAIIITTTTIL NEXT YEAR..."
    
    From Bar Harbour to WInter Haven, Provincetown to Barrington, the faded
    hats with the "B" are placed away for another winter.  When the Fat
    Lady finishes singing, a small fire starts burning in the heart of the
    faithful.  The fire of eternal hope, mixed with the embers of
    despair...another ride on the Red Sox Ferris Wheel has lurched to a
    stop...and once again, the Sox fan is stuck near the top.  The only
    solance one can take is to peer down at the seats stuck just below -
    the one's with those two guys from Chicago....
    
    JD
29.980It's no joke, dan'l... it's a living nightmare... :-(NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 01 1992 18:291
    
29.981CAMONE::WAYShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Wed Apr 01 1992 18:3718
>        <<< Note 29.979 by RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Anybody but the Dukies" >>>
>                       -< You talking about this, Saw? >-
>
>              <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
>               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
>================================================================================
>Note 29.675                  The Boston Red Sox Note                  675 of 977
>RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "From Here To Eternity"            95 lines   2-OCT-1991 11:17
>                            -< The End Is near... >-
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yes!!!!

Now I can extract that baby and save it.  That was priceless!!!!!


'Saw
29.982RDOVAX::BRAKEWed Apr 01 1992 19:4243
    OK, let's get serious about the Stanley, Gedman thing. I rag on tub-so
    alot but let me try and get as objective as is possible for a guy who
    has seen the film "Hunt for Red Sox in October" 43 times.
    
    Rich Gedman had a heart as big as his girth. He also had little
    catching experience as a catcher prior to the big leagues. His strength
    was his arm. He was certainly not a cat behind the plate and, for his
    size, had little power with the bat. His speed on the basepaths was not
    what one would call legendary.
    
    He had one year where he made the ALAS team and hit for average. That
    was the year when he had some of his natural swing and a hint of a
    Hriniak helicopter. The following years saw a total Hriniak style that
    Gedman couldn't handle. He was built and designed for power and treated
    like a Mark Belanger-type hitter.
    
    My contention is that, in a tight game, a truly "good" (not great, just
    good) catcher would be on his toes trying to block every pitch with
    every inch of his body. Gedman lacked the A) experience, B) athletic
    ability, C) smarts, D) All the above to arise to the situation.
    
    As far as Bob Stanley goes, this man was asked to be a starter, long
    reliever, closer, bullpen coach and beachball popper by the Sox. Never
    complained, grabbed the ball and did his best. He was affectionatley
    called Big Foot for years. From 1975 to 1985, he was the most
    consistent, successful pitcher the Red Sox had. Let's not EVER forget
    that. His best years were behind him in 1986 yet, as the season
    started, he was expected to be the main closer. He gave it a shot and
    failed. He was better suited, at that point in his career, to being a
    middle reliever.
    
    The problem with Game 6 was when MacNamara brought in Schiraldi so
    soon. Stanley should have come in instead while Schiraldi was held for
    the 9th inning. 
    
    As far as Schiraldi goes, let's not forget how he performed in the ACLS
    against the Angels. National exposure didn't cause the guy to choke.
    However, fatigue and mishandling by MacNamara, Gedman and whoever was
    the pitching coach then, in my opinion, caused Calvin to run out of
    gas in game 6.
    
    Rich
    
29.983SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 01 1992 20:013
       As soon as a saw Stanley headin' in from the bullpen, I knew the
    game was blown! Really, I cain still remember it. 
                                   Denny
29.984S%$%^#%^& was *born* with fear in his eyes...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 01 1992 20:0111
                                          
    > As far as Schiraldi goes, let's not forget how he performed in the ACLS
    > against the Angels. National exposure didn't cause the guy to choke.
    
    You mean when he came into that critical Game 4, the Sox trailing in
    games 2-1 but up 3-0 in the ninth and looking good to knot things up, 
    gave up a few hits and then plunked a batter with the bases loaded to 
    force in the tying run, then lost the game in the tenth?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.985CAMONE::WAYShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Wed Apr 01 1992 20:0716
C-c-c-can w-w-we change the s-s-subject.

I'm st-st-starting to flashb-b-back on a-a-a-all the old p-p-problems
I had in nine-nine-nine, uh, forget it, eighty six...

I've l-l-lost control of my b-b-bladder involunt-t-tarily again, and
now my skin is starting to f-f-flake, all in o-o-one day....

Pu-pu-pulease don't d-do this to m-me....


Doctor Inga, w-w-where are y-y-you?????



'S-'S-'Saw
29.986My B&^% is STILL MacNamaraRDOVAX::BRAKEWed Apr 01 1992 20:1329
    Unfortunately, certain players are remembered for only one or two
    things in a career. Johnny Pesky never lived down the double hitch from
    the 1946 WS as Enos Slaughter sped round the bases. Yet the man had an
    incredible career and, concerning the play, it is seldom brought up
    that Dominic had been replaced in CF and that the 2nd baseman did not
    yell directions when Pesky had his back to the plate.
    
    Ditto with Schriraldi, Glenn. I rememeber a classic confrontation
    between Calvin and Brian Downing in the ALCS. Downing was totally
    overmatched. But, at the same time, Schiraldi was being used up. The
    kid had been called up from the minors in July, for heaven's sake and
    led the team in Saves. Mac worked his tail off. And, in college, I
    believe he was a starter.
    
    Denny, you may have cringed when you saw Stanley coming in from the pen
    in Game 6. I did, too. I know the guy didn't have it anymore. But,
    there were many years I used to clinch my fist in a victory salute when
    I saw the Bobster coming into a game. 
    
    Do people blame Yaz for making the last out in the '78 playoffs? Not
    really. They blame Torrez for serving up the 'mater to (&%#$^&* Dent.
    People knew Yaz had passed his prime and hoped for the best. Why
    doesn't Stanley get this treatment? 'Cause he never had a bread named
    after him? Cause "Stanley" sounds like a wimp name? 'Cause he was
    overweight and ugly? 'Cause he couldn't run? Funny, but these traits
    never caused negative reactions in the '75-'85 years. 
    
    Rich
    
29.987Straighten up 'Saw, it's good for youNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 01 1992 20:3221
          
    In all seriousness, I have no problem whatsoever with Bob Stanley.  He
    had a fine career, and generally got a raw deal from the fans of
    Boston.  Yet I still hate to see the tendency to place the blame on 
    Rich Gedman to cover for Stanley's shortcomings later in his career, 
    including 1986.  Gedman really did have an excellent postseason that 
    year, no matter what happened later.
    
    S%^%^%&^%$ is a completely different story, though.  We can queue up the
    violins and pretend that McNamara and the Red Sox experience forever 
    ruined him, but rarely are things that simple in baseball.  The guy has 
    pretty much been a stiff wherever he's gone, and he was just never cut 
    out for the pressure that a relief ace has to deal with.  He did have a
    great run in the last two months of the 1986 regular season, but I
    suspect that that was all it was, a hot streak, too short to properly
    evaluate or place in context.  I agree that a deeper ballclub wouldn't 
    have had to rely on him to the ridiculous extent that the Sox did, time 
    after time in the postseason after repeated and notable failures...
    
    glenn
     
29.988PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Apr 01 1992 20:3510
29.989DECWET::METZGERWe'll always have Paris.Wed Apr 01 1992 20:4223
Actually as witnessed by Calvin's less than Stellar career post Red Sox I'm
surprised he did as well as he did. The man threw a flat fastball in the low
90's with little to no movement. He also had a tendency to throw the ball
around navel to chest high. 

Toss in the fact that he was gassed from overwork and only had 1 pitch I'm
still amazed he got as far as he did.

The can should never have been the first pitcher out of the pen in game 7. 
Oil can was always an extremely slow starter and had a tendency to get pounded
in the first 2 innings of a game. If he got out of them then he had a good 
chance of going 6 strong innings. He never had the temperment to be a relief
pitcher. It would have been suicide to bring him into game 7 as a reliever.

The sox really lost it when they blew a 2-0 game lead going back to fenway and
the Mets won it when Sid Fernandez came out of the pen and totally shut the
sox down in long relief.

I couldn't watch the game last night....it's just too painful. Somethings are
better off forgotten.....

Metz
29.990LUNER::BROOKSYeah, da Tew Yutes ....Thu Apr 02 1992 00:1519
    re Rich 
    
    We agree on one thing, The Can should have started game 7. He gives you
    5 innings or so, and you're all set, because then Hurst can come in and
    throw the last 4 at full speed.  Yes, Boyd was hit hard in Game 2 - but
    it was EARLY when it happened (what is forgotten is that he retired 19
    of his last 20 batters, or something close to that) ....
    
    Instead, what should have been obvious happened, Hurst ran out of gas,
    and the Sox got hammered.
    
    And I was rooting hard for Boston, because I couldn't stand the
    arrogance of the Mets, Knight and Carter especially. 
    
    But McNamara was a joke as a manager, and nothing proved it more to me
    than skipping The Can, and bringing in Al Nipper in Game 7.
    
    I congraulated the Mets fans for winning the WS right there on the spot
    - in the 7th inning.
29.991depends on your point of viewACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 02 1992 07:528
    re: .964
    
    Au contraire that game is ALWAYS a PLEASURE to watch, OVER and OVER and
    OVER again as the ball goes through Buckner's legs and completes an
    incredible comeback.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.992In a more serious veinACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 02 1992 08:0425
    Actually from a Mets fan perspective Wilson was not the player you
    really wanted to see at bat in the 10th inning with 2 outs. He always
    had a tendency to swing at bad pitches. Somehow he managed to connect
    on those swings in that at bat.
    
    If I recall Schiraldi had a pretty good season in 1986 didn;t he?
    
    I have always wondered if a healthy Seaver would have put the Sox over
    the top that year.
    
    Oil Can was not the right choice for Game 7, Hurst was. Hurst had
    pitched 2 phenomenal games already in the series. If you recall game 7
    was rained out and therefore Hurst could pitch that game. Most of the
    NY media wrote that the extra day certainly helped Boston because Hurst
    and not Boyd would start that game. The Mets were not terrified of
    Hurst like they were of Mike Scott in the NLCS but he was not their
    first choice. If you want to blame anyone in game 7 blame McNamara.
    Letting Hurst pitch to Hernandez made sense as a lefty-lefty match up.
    But if I am the manager I have Clemens warming up for such a situation
    and have him come in right after Hernandez's hit to try and blow away
    the side for 1 inning. Its the last game, and Clemens could have easily
    pitched one all out inning.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.993FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Apr 02 1992 12:166
    For those of you who don't read the papers:  The Red Sox may start the
    season wearing their blue practice uniforms in road games.  Their new
    road uniforms were returned when it was found they didn't fit the
    players properly.
    
    John
29.994Or tight in the crotch?KEPNUT::DIGGINSIn search of the lost chord.Thu Apr 02 1992 12:425
    
    What? Where the hats too small?
    
    
    Steve
29.995RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Apr 02 1992 12:4850
    Let's face it, only Red Sox fans (and, perhaps Cubs fans) continue to
    rehash and replay "What almost happened" over and over.
    
    Mac, I have seen the clip of the '46 Series countless times. Slaughter
    was running on the pitch and Walker hit a shot into the CF-RF gap. I
    can't recall who took DiMaggio's place in CF but the replacement lacked
    Dom's speed and arm. Peskey positioned himself correctly in short CF
    between the CF'er and home. As the ball was bouncing to him on 2 hops
    from the CF'er, the 2nd baseman is looking at the play in the outfield.
    
    Peskey catches the ball and, not knowing whether Slaughter is holding
    at 3rd or coming home, turns and scans the field for a split second.
    Noticing that Slaughter is 2 steps past 3rd at this moment, he then
    reloads and pegs to home where his throw is late.
    
    Peskey was lambasted by the Boston press for his hesitation. Yet, very
    little is said of the decision to start Denny Galehouse in that
    critical 7th game. Do the Sox ever change? Galehouse in '46, Waslewski
    in '67, Burton in '75 and Nipper in '86. (Actually, Waslewski pitched
    the 6th game in '67 to give Lonborg an extra day but, Lonborg was
    burned out by that time. Since Santiago and Bell were not that
    effective against the Cards, Williams tried something new).
    
    I think Peskey was unfairly criticized by ignorant press types for the
    play. 
    
    re Doc
    
    I'm not so sure about starting Boyd in Game 7. (I don't recall, was
    that in NY? I think it was) The Can had a load of talent but he was
    also prone to being affected by outside distractions. And, Lord knows,
    Shea Stadium had distractions. Perhaps, if he could have started and
    done well in the first 3 innings, he would have cruised. He certainly
    was well rested. The choice of Nipper, actually, was not a bad one. The
    NL is a fast ball league and, junk ballers have had some success in
    their first round through the league. But Nipper was NOT a premier junk
    baller and his fast ball, so to speak, would get hammered at the AA
    level. There was a chance, if Nipper was on, he could have frustrated
    Mets free swingers enough to get them pressing and lunging. But, it was
    typical Nipper....hammer time for the Mets.
    
    The story of Dennis Boyd is interesting. He was mishandled and
    mistreated in Boston. I think the same would have happened in Chicago,
    New York or Philadelphia. I think the intense media attention adversely
    affected a delicate personality. If the Can could have started in, say,
    Kansas City, Seattle or San Diego, he might have been an annual
    All-Star. 
    
    Rich
    
29.996EARRTH::BROOKSYeah, da Tew Yutes ....Thu Apr 02 1992 13:0423
    re .995
    
    re Pesky : I was reading an issue of "The Show" (?), and the famous
    'hesitation' was discussed. Apparently, none of the other players - on
    either team - nor any of the press present, felt that Pesky did
    anything wrong on the critical play. Somehow, someone entered 'Pesky
    hesitated' into a story - and many people believe that Walker's hit was
    a single (infact it was a legit 2B). Combined, Pesky was turned into a
    undeserving goat.
    
    Full credit should go Slaughter for hustle and speed, and a little to the 
    2B who didn't tell Pesky where to make his relay.
    
    re The Can,
    
    Interesting point Rich. Given Boyd's fine work his only full season in
    Montreal (the anthesis of Boston and NYC - at least for baseball),
    there may be merit to that. I really hope some team gives him a chance.
    Right now, he's caught in a money trap ... :-(
    
    Doc Oil Can
    
    
29.997USCTR2::NAHEARNThu Apr 02 1992 13:129
    Oil Can Boyd may very well have been (that's right, PAST TENSE) the
    most overrated pitcher to put on a big league uniform!!!  All mouth,
    little substance!!!  The Red Sox babysat him for years.....and IMHO he
    wasn't worth their efforts!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
29.998IAMOK::WASKOMGoofy's MomThu Apr 02 1992 13:257
    Cubs fans don't tend to replay key games like Red Sox fans do.  (Trust
    me, my first exposure to baseball was at Wrigley field.  (-:  ) 
    However, the only reason they don't is because they so seldom get close
    enough for it to count!  They're much more numb to failure than y'all
    here on the coast.
    
    A&W
29.999The CanRDOVAX::BRAKEThu Apr 02 1992 13:4333
    Nelly, I disagree. Dennis Boyd showed his skills in Boston too much for
    someone to ignore. Sure he was a character. He said outrageous things.
    He talked of being Satchel Paige reincarnated. He wore gold chains and
    talked to himself. 
    
    But, when Hrabosky or Fidrych acted eccentric, it was charming. At the
    same time, Hrabosky and Fidrych knew how to take advantage of their
    strange antics. Boyd, on the other hand, was a naive kid thrust into
    the limelight of a voracious sports town that looked to adore a star or
    find a goat for continued failings.
    
    When the Can first came up, his enthusiasm was cheered as a breath of
    fresh air. Boyd was like a 12 year old kid being exposed to a childhood
    icon. And the kid had a live arm. 
    
    He was "babied", as you say, because he had talent that needed to be
    developed and properly channeled. I think the Sox learned from the
    Rogelio Moret fiasco. They  lost a great talent in that kid (as they
    did in Bobby Sprowel, for that matter) and they didn't want to repeat
    the same thing with the raw talent they saw in Boyd.
    
    He never attained star status. But, an argument could be made that Boyd
    deserved an All Star birth a couple of years where he was left off.
    Supporters could make a good case that he was passed over due to his
    penchant for speaking his mind. (Something Bob Knight is applauded
    for).
    
    I liked the Can. He made me nervous but his enthusiasm was infective
    and a true departure to the typical malaise one becomes accustomed to
    in Sox players.
    
    Rich
    
29.1000NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 02 1992 13:5521
    
  >  Peskey was lambasted by the Boston press for his hesitation. Yet, very
  >  little is said of the decision to start Denny Galehouse in that
  >  critical 7th game.
    
    I think you're confusing games, Rich.  Denny Galehouse was the starting
    pitcher (picked by Joe McCarthy over Mel Parnell) for the one-game 
    playoff in 1948, and was shelled.  I don't know who pitched Game 7 in
    1946, but I don't think he had a particularly bad game...
    
    Pesky's hesitation is a thing of myth, for the most part.  It's been
    well-documented that the radio announcers at the game and the print
    guys in their columns the next morning made no mention of it, as it was
    oh-so-slight and might not have even made a difference.  To this day
    Pesky contends that he did nothing out of the ordinary on that play.
    However, some bigwig-type columnist (might have been Red Smith, I'm not 
    sure) made note of it in a nationally syndicated column or something,
    and then it was off to the races...
    
    glenn
     
29.1001Way too late for the Can or anyone else...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 02 1992 14:0713
    
    Oh yeah, and by the time Al Nipper came into 1986 Game 7, the game was
    already over.  He's the one that gave up the insurance home run to the
    Straw, right?  By that time S%^&^%^%@ had come into a tie game, given 
    up the game-winning homer to Ray Knight, put another man on, wild
    pitched him to second (on a pitchout, for cripes sake!) and let him
    score on another hit.  Nipper was only out there because at the time it
    wasn't clear whether the Sox bullpen was going to allow the game to 
    end...
    
    glenn
    
    
29.1002WhoooopsRDOVAX::BRAKEThu Apr 02 1992 14:4817
    re <<< Note 29.1000 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
    
    >I think you're confusing games, Rich.  Denny Galehouse was the starting
    >pitcher (picked by Joe McCarthy over Mel Parnell) for the one-game 
    >playoff in 1948, and was shelled.  I don't know who pitched Game 7 in
    >1946, but I don't think he had a particularly bad game...
    
    Damn, Glenn, ya got me. I just finished reading an SCD story on
    Galehouse and should've known better.
    
    I believe that Pesky DID suffer from what was percieved on that play. I
    agree, it was not mentioned by radio or newspaper that day or the next
    but the subject DID come up shortly after the Series and Pesky DID
    become a goat, unfairly.
    
    Rich
    
29.1003AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhThu Apr 02 1992 15:4614
    	Good to have you back Rich, I disagree with Santiago pitching
    poorly against the Cardinals.  He lost game one of the series 2-1
    to Bob Gibson (and got the Sox only run with a homer).  Possibly
    because he did pitch in the first game it was to soon to bring him
    back for game 6.  And as far as Moret goes the guy never had a chance
    no matter who he pitched for.  He had an IQ of just over 70 and
    no matter where he went management just looked at his ability to
    pitch and not his inability to deal with the stress of a major league
    ballplayer's life.  The Sox were just as guilty as the other teams
    he pitched for as far as neglecting an obvious problem, but they
    didn't ruin his career.  Gammons did a real good article about Moret
    not long after his breakdown.
    
    				/Don
29.1004JARETH::YANKOWSKASMeghan is one year old todayThu Apr 02 1992 15:476
    re the Can:
    
    Did any team pick him up this spring, even to a triple-A contract?
    
    
    py
29.1005LJOHUB::CRITZThu Apr 02 1992 16:458
    	RE: 29.994 [RE: 29.993]
    
    	No, it wasn't that their hats were to small.
    
    	They returned the uniforms because their wallet pockets
    	were too small.
    
    	Scott
29.1006RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Apr 02 1992 17:3024
    Hey Slasher - How ya doin?
    
    Santiago had that one good game in #1 but showed nothing after that. It
    was clear that the Sox were a 1 pitcher team - that pitcher being
    Lonborg. The race for the pennant had sapped that staff.
    
    As far as Moret goes, if I am not mistaken, he was 14-2 for the Sox one
    year. Admittedly, he was no Rhodes scholar (but, since Clinton is one,
    I'll wait for awhile before I call that a handicap) but he had a live
    arm and a lot of potential. I'm not saying the Sox are the only team
    that would have lacked the sensitivity to deal with him. But certainly
    they didn't go out of their way to ease things for him. 
    
    I know, I know, a major leaguer must have the mental toughness to go
    along with with physical talents. But this kid coulda been a contenda!
    If the Sox would have shielded him from the media or made a few moves
    to ease his anxiety, they may have had a heck of a pitcher who would
    have matured slowly but surely. Who was the pitching coach then,
    Jackson? Surely his minor league manager must have known his delicate
    nature. Surley this should have been discussed with management prior to
    his advancement.
    
    Rich
    
29.1007Boyd not faultless, but the Sox pinned themselves inNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 02 1992 17:4423
    
    I think the Sox were more negligent with Moret than Boyd.  I don't
    recall anyone ever lifting a finger to help Moret, who really had some
    serious psychological problems.  Boyd was, as his career record 
    indicates, just flat-out average.  Yes, he had a couple of decent years, 
    but nothing that should have guaranteed him a spot on the All-Star team 
    (as if the Sox had any control over that in the first place).  Stuff 
    like barging out of the clubhouse and quitting the team in the middle
    of a pennant race because he wasn't selected for the All-Star team was 
    immature and irrational.  
    
    If anything, the Red Sox dealt with Boyd much too leniently because of 
    the heat generated by their abysmal record of developing minority
    players.  That's their own damn fault, and they've paid the price in a
    number of ways (the Boyd saga being only a relatively minor one).  By 
    contrast, even though Boyd pitched decently for them for a while, when 
    things got ugly in Montreal and the Can starting complaining about his
    innings the Expos sent him packing pronto, with absolutely no one to 
    have to answer to.  The obvious difference is that the Expos'
    organization has always treated everyone the same way...
    
    glenn
    
29.1008Boston Red Sox Player SalariesSOFBAS::BELISLEMike Belisle MRO4-3/H9 297.3324Thu Apr 02 1992 18:0020
Pitchers Tom Bolton	  470,000	Infielders Wade Boggs	  2,700,000
	 Roger Clemens	4,555,250		   Scott Cooper	    125,000
	 Danny Darwin	3,250,000		   Tim Naehring	    130,000
	 John Dopson	  265,000		   Jody Reed	  1,600,000
	 Tony Fossas	  350,000		   Luis Rivera    1,075,000
	 Mike Gardnier	  167,000		   John Valentin    109,000
	 Greg Harris	1,400,000		   Mo Vaughn	    155,000
	 Joe Hesketh	1,775,000		   Jack Clark	  2,900,000
	 Peter Hoy	  109,000
	 Jeff Reardon	2,633,334      Outfielders Tom Brunansky  2,700,000
	 Frank Viola	4,733,333		   Ellis Burks	  2,300,000
	 Matt Young	2,266,667		   Mike Greenwell 3,050,000
						   Phil Plantier    185,000
Catchers John Marzano	  350,000		   Herm Winningham  450,000
	 Tony Pena	2,400,000
	 John Flaherty	 unsigned

1992 Team Payroll $42,203,584(4th in MLB)
Average Salary    $ 1,507,271
29.1009MCIS1::DHAMELLive long and perspireThu Apr 02 1992 20:037
    
    Yowza!  Imagine earning over $100k, say in the case of Hoy, and having
    nowhere to go but up!  I guess the old expression "getting invited up
    for a cup of coffee" is one mighty fine cup of coffee.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1010MCIS1::DHAMELLive long and perspireMon Apr 06 1992 12:4232
    
    Some predictions on this day before the opener against the damn
    yankees:
    
    -Sox will go no more than 10 games above .500, which will keep them in
    the hunt, but not long enough or strong enough.
    
    -Moe Vaughn will prove to be the second coming of Sam Horn, except
     Sam had more power.
    
    -Sox will draw over 2 million. Duh!  This is guaranteed.
    
    -Clemens/Viola combined records will be a disappointing 5 games above
     .500.
    
    -Sox will play their best ball in September, narrrowing the 1st place 
     gap from 10 to 4 games, only to play sub .500 ball the last two weeks
     of the season.
    
    -Tony Pena will be fooled by a changeup and lash a hit to left field.
     Boggs will do likewise, and hit one to right.
    
    -Sox will find out too late in the season that Valentin-Naehring is one
    helluva SS-2B combo.
    
    -First major flareup will be between Greenwell and Hobson, and will
    occur before Memorial Day.
    
    -I will watch all or parts of just about every game.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1011My predictions.......USCTR2::NAHEARNMon Apr 06 1992 16:2937
    
    
    -Sox will win the American League East by 7 games
    
    _Sox will win ALCS
    
    -Sox will win World Series
    
    -Boggs will win batting championship
    
    -Plantier will be IMMENSE
    
    -Burks will exceed career average in ALL categories
    
    -Greenwell will hit .320 with 18 dingers, 110 RBI's (and will be 3rd on
    the team in RBI's!!!)
    
    -Clark, Darwin and Young will each exceed the expectations people had
    for them last year!!!
    
    -Matt Young will be voted TV38 Tenth Player Award winner
    
    -Danny Darwin will be personally responsible for 3 bench-clearing
    brawls!!
    
    -Tim Naehring's back will withstand the rigors of a full season and
    postseason.
    
    -Wade Boggs will win a much-overdue Gold Glove.
    
    -Tom Brunansky will be Mr. Clutch this year.
    
    -Clemens will win 24, Viola will win 21 and Matt Young will win 17!!!
    
    
    
    Nelly
29.1012RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 06 1992 16:3273
    
    >>-Sox will go no more than 10 games above .500, which will keep them in
    >>the hunt, but not long enough or strong enough.
    
    Given that the AL East has two teams fading fast (Tigers and Brewers)
    and two teams bound to building (Indians and Yankees) it appears to me
    that the Sox will be a co-fav with the Jays. However, I see the East
    race being a 3 team affair with the Sox, Jays and Orioles. I see the
    Sox doing a little better than 15 games over .500.
    
    >>-Moe Vaughn will prove to be the second coming of Sam Horn, except
    >>Sam had more power.
    
    Funny you said this, Dickstah. I just told a friend of mine the same
    thing. I think Mo will make the Sox realize how much they miss Carlos.
    
    >>-Sox will draw over 2 million. Duh!  This is guaranteed.
    
    Agreed. But, what will the settlement of the Yawkey estate mean to the
    team? I understand she left her interests to Harrington who intends to
    sell that pending final settlement of Jean's estate.
    
    >>-Clemens/Viola combined records will be a disappointing 5 games above
     .500.
    
    I disagree with this prognosis. Rojah will go 21-12 and Frankie will
    start slow but end up at around 18-9. After that, though, they are
    shakey. Hesketh will probably be out of the rotation by Memorial Day.
    Last year was fluke for him. Young may win 10 but he will also lose 10.
    I think using Darwin as a setup man for Reardon is smart. Darwin should
    be able to take the place of Jeff Gray. Morten and Gardiner? Who knows?
    
    >>-Sox will play their best ball in September, narrrowing the 1st place 
    >> gap from 10 to 4 games, only to play sub .500 ball the last two weeks
    >> of the season.
    
    I see them making the run in July and the first part of August, fading
    into Labor Day and then churning it back up for a climatic end of
    September battle with Toronto and Baltimore.
    
    >>-Tony Pena will be fooled by a changeup and lash a hit to left field.
    >> Boggs will do likewise, and hit one to right.
    
    We will see alot more of John Marzano. Tony is losing it offensively
    but one cannot minimize his leadership and ability to handle pitchers.
    I think Boggs will hit .320 and play 130 games. The disparity between
    his offense in Fenway and away will become even more apparent. He will
    re-sign with Boston.
    
    >>-Sox will find out too late in the season that Valentin-Naehring is one
    >>helluva SS-2B combo.
    
    I disagree. Naehring has yet to show he is a big leaguer. Magnificent
    at AAA but who knows what he can do in the show. Would be nice to see
    another Burleson (That's who he reminded me of when he played at
    Pawtucket) but who knows. Valentin may be called up by July 4 if Luis
    plays like Luis. 
    
    I also do not think Jody Reed should be tampered with. He is now one of
    the best 2nd basemen in the game.
    
    >>-First major flareup will be between Greenwell and Hobson, and will
    >>occur before Memorial Day.
    
    That's a pretty good bet. Other possibilities are Clark and Hobson,
    Boggs and Hobson or Clemens and Hobson.
    
    >>-I will watch all or parts of just about every game.
    
    Wish I could say the same.
    
    Rich
    
29.1013Book itAXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhMon Apr 06 1992 18:494
    	One Boston scribe noted that the Red Sox always win the World
    Series the year after a Russian revolution.
    
    				/Don
29.1014SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Apr 06 1992 18:542
       Looks like Nellie went out for lunch!
                                 Denny 8^)
29.1015Not.SHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubMon Apr 06 1992 18:5713
29.1016'86 sealed it fer meCTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 06 1992 19:3612
    Well I look at it this way,
    
    The Bosox are in a cabal with the other doomed teams ( Rangers,
    Cubbies,etc.) Since this is/was the best chance that the Rangers
    have of winning the Stanley Cup only to be striked out ( still
    outstanding), then natcherly their bosom-soulmates, the RedFlops,
    will go down in a choked-filled inferno. The year doesn't matter.
    Destiny wins out.
    
    MikeL
    
    
29.1017:^)USCTR2::NAHEARNMon Apr 06 1992 19:547
    I stand by my predictions and am offended by the suggestion that
    alcohol consumption influenced my thoughts.....(HICK)......!!!!
    
    
    Regards,
            
    (HICK)Nelly
29.1018FRETZ::HEISERmaranatha!Mon Apr 06 1992 21:444
>    	One Boston scribe noted that the Red Sox always win the World
>    Series the year after a Russian revolution.
    
    Yeah but the Communist revolution II won't occur until later this year.
29.1019ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Apr 07 1992 16:1111
    re: .1001
    
    Glen,
    
    When Nipper came in the Red Sox had come form a 6-3 deficit to make it
    6-5. They had the tying run at 2nd with no one out but Orosco shut them
    down. The HR Nipper gave up was a huge blow to the Sox that late in a
    one run ball game.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1020You should be renamed "The Thankful Met" 8^)CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 07 1992 16:231
    
29.1021Hip hip hooray for Johnny MacACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Apr 07 1992 16:276
    re: .1020
    
    Yo, leave my name/handle alone :-)
    
    The Crazy (ok ok and in that case Thankful) Met
    
29.1022RUGBY1::wayShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Tue Apr 07 1992 16:5215
Did anyone catch the piece about Carlton Fisk, entitled "Pudge"
on CBS Sunday Morning?

It was interesting to hear his thoughts about Boston and what they
did to him.  

He said he felt violated, he said he has problems with getting TOO up for
the Boston games.


Have to hand it to this man.  They talk of Nolan Ryan, but Pudge is also
an incredible player.....


'Saw
29.1023RDOVAX::BRAKETue Apr 07 1992 17:1816
    Clark Booth did an interview with Fisk about 3 years ago and the
    message was the same. He felt slighted that the Sox waited one extra
    day to mail him his contract. 
    
    That was the bottom line, to me. Although I miss seeing the guy in a
    Red Sox uniform I think his ego got the best of him. Sure, Pudge spoke
    of some other piddly things but the bottom line was he felt he was too
    important for the Sox to have mailed his contract 1 day late.
    
    Why this hatred has lasted so long....I can't understand. I can
    understand if he carried a grudge against Hayseed Sullivan or Don
    Zimmer but I can't see how he can still hold such hatred for the whole
    organization.
    
    Rich
    
29.1024RANGER::LEFEBVREIntel Inside (tm)Tue Apr 07 1992 18:214
    Vaughn and Plantier jacked taters in the 2nd against Sanderson.  Sox
    lead Yanks 2-1 after 4.5.
    
    Mark.
29.1025parade in OctoberJARETH::YANKOWSKASOrioles 162-0Tue Apr 07 1992 18:241
    
29.1026No parade in October!CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 07 1992 20:424
    Yankmees win 4-3, Clemens gits the loss. HR's by Plantier ands Vaughn.
    
    Fire Hobson and Gorman! Season's over!
    
29.1027GONG :-)JARETH::YANKOWSKASOrioles 162-0Tue Apr 07 1992 20:451
    
29.1028Heard on radioSCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 08 1992 11:443
       Sox caint sell beer at Fenway for a couple weeks...
    They lost the opener!
                                 Denny
29.1029Wait'll next year... (-:SHARE::DERRYMatt 'Cy' YoungWed Apr 08 1992 11:571
    
29.1030Stick a fork in 'em...MCIS1::DHAMELIron Mike VS Queen of Mean on PPVWed Apr 08 1992 12:292
    
    
29.1031STIFFS!KEPNUT::DIGGINSHELP! I'm having hockey withdrawl!Wed Apr 08 1992 12:421
    
29.1032AXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Wed Apr 08 1992 14:1818
It doesn't bother me so much that they lost, as it does how they lost.

It looked like a continuation of last year. They left 8 men on base, they
got the lead-off man on 4 times the lasted 5 innings, they failed to move
the runners along, they failed to sacrifice when it seemed appropriate,
they failed to pinch-run for Pena late in game....etc.

I am certainly willing to give Hobson the time he needs to mold this team
into "his" team, but with all of this talk about, "being more aggressive",
I would at least like see some signs of it.

It's goning to be a long season,

I could use a good dose of hockey, to keep my mind off of the Sox til June,

Chap
    

29.1033PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Apr 08 1992 14:476
29.1034AXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Wed Apr 08 1992 15:0223
29.1035Petrocelli goes back, he's got it! There's pand..CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSWed Apr 08 1992 15:0213
    
    Need help with this one.
    
    I've been frantically searching for a '67 Red Sox calendar kinda
    like Denny's Sports Calendar. Thought it would be fun looking at
    Red Sox history in '67 on a day by day basis since this is the
    25th anniversary of The Impossible Dream. Anyone seen/heard of
    such a calendar or advice on where to look. If'n I find it, I'd
    be glad to post the daily events in here. 
    
    Danke,
    MikeL
    
29.1036PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Apr 08 1992 15:058
29.1037FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 15:117
    Flaherty was at home in New Jersey when Marzano was put on the DL
    yesterday.  Flaherty got caught in traffic and a normal 20 minute trip
    took him over an hour.  Given that he got to the game just as it was
    beginning and so forth without much of a chance to adjust, Hobson was
    reluctant to put him in.
    
    John
29.1038AXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Wed Apr 08 1992 15:1218
29.1039SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 08 1992 15:475
      The guy called up was already there. Hobson said he didn't want to
    put hin in for the bottom of the 9th pressure. Looks like he didn't
    have to worry about that though huh? They never got to the bottom of
    the 9th and Pena never got off of 1st base!
                                     Denny
29.1040no pressure no problemAD::HEATHWed Apr 08 1992 16:034
    Yes, Flaretty (sp) was there and the poin about not putting him in the
    bottom of the ninth pressure is a joke.  No run no bottom, no problem!!
    
    Jerry
29.1041AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhWed Apr 08 1992 16:299
    	Hey MikeL, if you ever find that '67 Sox Calendar check to see
    if they have my favorite '67 Sox Moment, the day Tony Horton got
    stuck between the tarpaulin and the wall in Cleveland trying to
    chanse down a fly ball.  I thought they were going to get a crane
    to haul him out.  My second favorite Sox Moment came when the Sox
    and the Yankees had a beanball brawl and Rico Petrocelli knocked
    off Joe Pepitone's wig.
    
    				/Don
29.1042That Boston team's really on the beam. Cuz we...CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSWed Apr 08 1992 16:3910
    /Don,
    HAHAHA. I remember Horton between tha tarp and the wall. And Pepitone!
    Thad Tillotson started it. Remember Reggie Smith picking up Tillotson
    and slammin' him to the ground?
    
    As mentioned before, my all-time favorite was seein' Tillman play
    ricochet with Wyatt's haid!
    
    MikeL
    
29.1043....got Yaz! Pow! There it goes again! Carl Yast...CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSWed Apr 08 1992 16:411
    
29.1044AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhWed Apr 08 1992 16:464
    	...and remember when Williams benched Scott (who was batting
    over .300) 'cuz he was to fat?
    
    				/Don
29.1045RUGBY1::wayShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Wed Apr 08 1992 16:469
Scott...

Whatta rush.  He just like to hit them "taters"....



8^)

'Saw
29.1046SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 08 1992 17:011
    ...he liked to eat 'em too!
29.1047SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu Apr 09 1992 10:453
    And George was ALWAYS ready for an interview!  The media loved him.
    
    lEe
29.1048Ah, baseball.SHARE::DERRYMatt 'Cy' YoungMon Apr 13 1992 10:508
    Wow.  Whatta wacky weekend...
    
    Young throws a no-hitter (the rules sip) *and* throws to first.
    
    I admit that when they blew a 5 run lead on Saturday, I shut the
    game off.
    
    Clemens is GOD.  Hi Mikey. (-: 
29.1049Tribe bats can only get better HYDRA::HAUSRATHNew grass on the fieldMon Apr 13 1992 12:156
    
    Clemens always looks "all-world" against Cleveland..  
    
    If the Tribe could have bunted Saturday, they would have won that one.  
    
    /Jeff
29.1050Always a Hard Luck GuyRDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 13:071
    Now Matt Young knows how Andy Hawkins feels.
29.1051CNTROL::CHILDSAnybody but the LakersMon Apr 13 1992 14:008
 cmon now Karen you know Clemens, you know his ego meter was pegged to over-
 load and ready to crash and burn under big game (ie opener 33k+ fans) pres-
 sure so he took the easy way out and pitched in front of a thousand.....

 Ditto what Jeff said....right Slash?

 ;^)
29.1052'67CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 13 1992 14:5617
    Well it's not a day to day calendar of the '67 Red Sox Impossible
    Dream season, but I guess it'll do.  Beginning today WEEI will be
    running a daily segment called Impossible Dream Remembered. At
    8:15 AM on weekdays and 9:15 on weekends, Ken Coleman,the voice of
    the '67 Red Sox, does a one minute segment (taped of course) on
    the Bosox' baseball events of that particular day in '67.
    
    So for 4/13/67, the Red Sox go 1-0, Jim Lonborg is 1-0 as the Red
    Sox beat the White Sox 5-4 in front of 8,243 customers at frigid
    Fenway. SS Rico Petrocelli is the star as he gits HR #1 and knocks in
    4 RBI. John Wyatt and Don McMahon relieve for Lonborg.
    
    1-0!
    
    MikeL
    
    
29.1053MCIS1::DHAMELBut I never exhaledMon Apr 13 1992 15:256
    
    Indians get 20 hits Saturday and lose.  Two hits yesterday is enough
    to split a double header.  Funny game, this Bazeball.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1054MONGUS::BRYDIEThat's when I reach for my revolverMon Apr 13 1992 15:443
    
     Another interesting little factoid given during yesterday's games was 
    that the Red Sox payroll is $42 million to Cleveland's $8 million.
29.1055NOT.............WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 15:564
    
    
          Impossible Dream? What did the Sox win something that year of
    NInetEEn hundad and sixseven.
29.1056down into the ratholeACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 15:596
    Chappy,
    
    Sox won a whole lot more in 1967 than the Yankees
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1057?????????????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 16:048
    
    
           Wheres the big ring...
    
             Crazy Sox fan.....
    
    
           Chap.....
29.1058AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhMon Apr 13 1992 16:044
    	Hobson should've had Reed bunting in the 9th inning of yesterday's
    first game.  
    
    				/Don
29.1059PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Apr 13 1992 16:143
    The Sox have not finished in last place in their division since 1932. 
    This is the longest such streak in baseball (and perhaps in all
    sports).
29.1060out of loathing of the YankeesACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 16:157
    re: 1967
    
    Sorry Chappy, but this guy don't give a hoot if the Sox won the WS or
    not, they beat the Yankees making it in my eyes a good year for them.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1061RANGER::LEFEBVRELet's eat sushi and not payMon Apr 13 1992 16:213
    I'd gladly trade a season or two in the basement for a Ring.
    
    Mark.
29.1062AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhMon Apr 13 1992 16:321
    	I thought they tied for last in 1965.
29.1063I'd trade 74 years in the cellar for a ring...WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 16:336
    
    
           Who cares if they haven't been in the cellar since 1934. isn't
    Cleveland in there Div? All I hear is 1967 impossible dream impossible
    dream. Geez they didn't win it. Is 1981 the Yankee's impossible dream
    because they almost beat the dodgers in 7. NO! 
29.1064PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Apr 13 1992 16:5925
29.1065We're not last !!! We're not last !!!SHALOT::HUNTRoss Is My HossMon Apr 13 1992 17:227
29.1066RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 17:2634
    Well said, Mac - and I had no idea they haven't finished last since
    '32.
    
    I guess it's hard for folks who haven't lived with this franchise to
    understand the deeper meaning of 1967 to us. They didn't see Dick
    Stuart blow games with the glove and they weren't witness to Pinky
    Higgins running the team. They were not here when Pumpsie Green and
    Gene Conley jumped the team to fly to Israel. They have heard of Ted
    Williams but, in reality, he was just about the only reason to go to
    the ball park. 
    
    The mediocraty of the '53-'60 Red Sox compounded with the lethargic
    uninspired play of the '61-'66 Sox led the Sox fans to expect more of
    the same.
    
    Yet, '67 was magic. Eddie Stankey called Yaz an All-Star from the neck
    down. Nobody thought the Sox were for real. The Chisox, Twins and
    Tigers all had more experienced, powerful teams - on paper. The Sox had
    youngins like Foy and Scott and Jones and Andrews. Reggie Smith was the
    opening day 2nd baseman. Mike Ryan and Russ Gibson - two very
    forgettable players were the Sox catchers. It would be like the Indians
    winning it this year. Yeah, there are a lot of young players who have
    promise but they haven't been through a pennant race before.
    
    So, let those who haven't had the excitement of '67 in their blood
    laugh at us. It makes it all the more enjoyable to recall that
    wonderful year.
    
    BTW - Those who didn't live through it can't even begin to understand
    how important it was for every Sox fan to do a perfect Yaz batting
    stance.
    
    Rich
     
29.1067something a Yankee fan will never understandACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 17:406
    To some extent those of us who rooted for the 1969 Mets know what it
    must have felt like rooting for the 1967 Red Sox. In a somewhat similar
    vein those who rooted for the 1991 Braves.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1068Don't categorize Yankee fans ............WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 17:587
    
        "Something a Yankee fan will never understand"
    
            Untrue Yoseff. The Yanks too have had there doldrums. I
    remember one year when we were down 14+ games on July 19th(my birthday)
    and they were written off and came back to win the division and the
    WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP.
29.1069ouchRANGER::LEFEBVRELet's eat sushi and not payMon Apr 13 1992 18:021
    
29.1070Still not the sameACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 18:0813
    re: .1068
    
    Chappy, sure the Yankees had a great comeback in 1978 but there is no
    way you can compare that to the 1967 Red Sox, 1969 Mets, 1991 Braves.
    The Yankees won the World Series in 1977, so their winning 100 games in
    1978 and then the WS again was not a real great surprise. The surprise
    would have been if they had not won the division (ala the 1987 Mets).
    In the other 3 cases we're talking about teams that were way at the
    bottom of their division or league one year and then went on to at
    least win the pennant the following year.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1071Define Miracle - Spell ItRDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 18:3419
    re Chappy
    
    You just don't understand, freind. Your Yankees have won more world
    championships than any other pro franchise in America. How can anyone,
    other than totally self-indulgent gluttons, call any season in Yankee
    history a miracle? 
    
    Your bought the Babe, you bought Reggie and Dave. You bought Don
    Gullet. Expectations are always high. Yanks win? Who cares? Ho Hum.
    Sorta like the Celtics or Lakers. They are expected to win. If the
    Lakers are a lottery team this year and they win the whole thing next
    year, would you call it the miracle of 1992-93? Of course not.
    
    Long sufferers like fans of the NY Rangers, Cubs, Phillies, Red Wings,
    Bullets, Patriots - these are teams - should they win a championship,
    that would be a miracle.
    
    Rich
     
29.1072WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 18:4510
    
    
          I'm not sayingit was a miracle in 78. It was a joke. If you were
    a sox fan living in New York. Or a Celtic fan living in LA, you would
    know my premise. I just get sick of hearing about the Impossible dream
    or about 1975. When you finally do win it you'll know what I mean.
                    ^
                    IF
    
    
29.1073CTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 13 1992 18:4524
    Rich and Mac
    You hit the nail on the head about the significance of the '67 Red Sox.
    If I remember correctly, no one much suffered with the World Series
    loss to the Cards. We were all astounded they were even there. '67
    brings back the fun fun summer we all had watching the Sox. 
    I started attending Bosox games in the summer of '60 when my Dad took
    this young 6 yr old to his first game. I saw a few games every year
    from '60 to '66 ( anyone recall going in buses from their local Elks
    clubs to sit in the right field grandstand?) and loved every minute 
    of it. The feeling of being in a pennant race and exhilirating in it
    was sheer joy for most Red Sox fans. The team won its fans hearts back
    in '67. It is just a special club to me, much more than any other
    Red Sox team, World Series loss nonwithstanding.  
    
    The present day Red Sox angst surfaced after the
    Aparicio-trip-rounding-third-73 Sox; choking-on-Oriole presuure-74 Sox;
    Darrell Johnson-Jim Burton-cupcake-75 sox; and the
    BFDent-Torrez-Gerbil-78 Sox. Redsoxangst was indelibly marked in Shea-
    choked-86 Sox.
    
    Nuff said,
    67 rules
    MikeL
     
29.1074What's next, you ran into a hot team?SHALOT::MEDVIDNew Dream Date LogMon Apr 13 1992 18:548
    Ahhhhhhh, 1967, the year of the Excellent Loss.
    
    You sure the BoSox don't wear Carolina Blue jock straps?
    
    And do you guys realize how funny you sound waxing poetic in Hare
    Smithna fashion?  Rollllllward!
    
    	--dan'l
29.1075SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Apr 13 1992 18:561
       ...so how bad are the Socks losing in the opener today?
29.1076ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 18:597
    Chappy, I too get sick of hearing about the Impossible Dream and stuff
    like that, and I am not a Yankee fan or fan of any AL team. The point
    is that being a Yankee fan there are certain things that you just can't
    understand. 
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1077CTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 13 1992 18:597
    No way dan'l!
    
    Big difference. Losses are never rationalized, (well in this case,
    tolerated 8^)  ). We strive for champeenships, thus the angst!
    
    MikeL
    
29.1078go Birds!JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasMon Apr 13 1992 19:028
    >   ...so how bad are the Socks losing in the opener today?
    
    5-3 Orioles after three innings.
    
    There's a notesfile for game updates, LIME::SOX_UPDATES
    
    
    py
29.1079PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Apr 13 1992 19:105
    The reason you are hearing so much about the Impossible Dream team
    lately is because it happened 25 years ago.  It's kind of like the
    publicity around the 75th anniversary of the NHL.
    
    If you don't like it, you can always go back to the Bronx...
29.1080WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 19:148
    
    
        6-3 4TH INNING
    
               Go O's...
    
             If I didn't love the Yankee file so much I would quit my job
    and move to the Bronx. :-)
29.1081RANGER::LEFEBVRELet's eat sushi and not payMon Apr 13 1992 19:173
    Viola knocked out in the 5th.
    
    Mark.
29.1082RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 19:2438
    Cappy - I have never lived in Denver. For the life of me, I cannot
    understand the fanatic support given to the Broncos. Read the Bronco
    note to get a taste of this fan support. These guys, I guess, have more
    suffering than Red Sox fans since we can at least say we HAVE won a
    world championship. 
    
    Red Sox fans are cynics. Bronco fans tend to be optimists, IMO.
    
    I have also felt that part of the strong feelings about the Sox have
    their roots in Harry Frazee's selling of the Babe to the Yankees. When
    Boston got the Babe back, he was washed up and in a Braves uniform.
    
    I'll tell you, I spent August in Atlanta last year and it was magic.
    Every play was diagnosed to death, every pitch disected. People were
    happy to get stuck in a traffic jam if it meant having a few more
    minutes to listen to the game.
    
    Yankee fans may NEVER have this feeling. It's hard to explain. The Mets
    had it in '69. They know.
    
    As far as Excellent Losses, I find that accusation rather insulting.
    Red Sox fans are the first to say that the best team won in the '67
    Series, Zimmer blew it in '75 by feuding with Carbo and not leaving
    Willoughby in to pitch, Zimmer blew it by keeping Hobson at 3rd base in
    '78 down the stretch, MacNamara blew it in '85 by not replacing
    Stapleton n the 9th. 
    
    Think about the above. Sox fans don't blame the other team or ump
    calls. They look at their own team and analyze their
    faults/shortcomings. You don't hear talk of favoritism, home field
    advantage, being weary or playing with injuries. Those are cop outs and
    those would be the alibis of Excellent Losers.
    
    If you live in greater Boston, Capp, get used to it. It is a religion
    and it is as much a fabric of life as the air you breathe.
    
    Rich
    
29.1083Chappy and me in the same boat, oh no! :-)ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 19:339
    re: .1082
    
    Replacing Stapleton in 1985??? Don;t you mean Buckner in 1986.
    
    Otherwise a good explanation. But I am sure Chappy will agree that
    despite all of that we don't have to like it.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1084RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 19:3910
    
    re .1083
    
    >>    Replacing Stapleton in 1985??? Don;t you mean Buckner in 1986.
    
    Yeah, your right. Sorry 'bout that. You have no idea how hard it was
    for me to omit my feelings on Rich Gedman that b*% Fa$ S@#b.
    
    Rich
    
29.1085Grasp throat and squeeze tight now....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 19:487
    
    
            A met and a Yankee fan in the same boat nahhhh couldn't
    happen. Even though the Mets from 85 to the present kind of remind me
    of the early eighty yanks 81-83. all the talent and so little to show
    for it.
    
29.1086ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 19:587
    I like taking over this note :-)
    
    Chappy, wasn't Jackson gone by the 1982 season and didn't they lose
    some other players around that time (Chambliss, etc.)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1087PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Apr 13 1992 20:172
    Apparently Chappy is actually a closet Red Sox fan.  He's been seen in
    HECKLE::BASEBALL looking for updates of the score of today's game.
29.1088WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Mon Apr 13 1992 20:228
    
    
    
             NOT.........
    
            I just love hearing about the Sox losing. And I just LOVE
    BASEBALL in general.....
    
29.1089CUPMK::DEVLINEmployees and Kevin Only!Tue Apr 14 1992 12:188
    Mac -
    
    Big Deal.  They haven't finished on top of Baseball since 1918.  Stats
    like the one you put forward, IMO, are loser's stats.  I'd rather have
    9 years of last place ball and 1 year of a champeenship, then 10 years
    of second place.
    
    JD
29.1090RDOVAX::BRAKETue Apr 14 1992 13:1124
    re .1089
    
    I don't know, JD. Can you imagine how hard it is to be an Indian fan?
    Sure they won the Series in the 40's and came close in '54 but year in,
    year out, they are at the bottom. Crowds are embarrasing. Seems every
    year they are out of it by the All Star break. Ditto with the Atlanta
    Braves until last year. 
    
    With the Sox they were respectable through the 40's and early 50's,
    they had Ted Williams to showcase through their mediocre times in the
    mid to late '50's. In the early '60's they were awful. The Indians of
    their day. Since '67 they have had a shot at the pennant nearly every
    year and kept the fans interested into September and, sometimes,
    October.
    
    What is so wrong with being one of the top teams for 25 straight years?
    Sure, the championship will be nice when it comes but my team has gone
    toe to toe with the best of them for a quarter century and at least I
    know each year they have as good a chance as anyone.
    
    BTW - Outside of K Griffey Jr, who ya have to root for in Seattle?
    
    Rich
    
29.1091HAHAHAHAHAHA(tm)SHALOT::MEDVIDNew Dream Date LogTue Apr 14 1992 13:2110
>    What is so wrong with being one of the top teams for 25 straight years?
>    Sure, the championship will be nice when it comes but my team has gone
>    toe to toe with the best of them for a quarter century and at least I
>    know each year they have as good a chance as anyone.
    
    Yet another quote from the Tarheel mantra collection.  Keep it up,
    guys.  This is rollwardly funny.
    
    	--dan'l
    
29.1092Ix-nay the Tarhell connectionCTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 14 1992 13:3116
    I dunno Rich,
    It's nice to be in a competetive position for 25 years, but I want
    a dadgum CHAMPIONSHIP!!. THE HELL WITH ALMOST THERE!
    You cain stop laughin' now dan'l, I've purged this discussion from
    delving further into the Tarhell mantra. Your welcome.
    
    MikeL
    
    P.S. Maybe I'd rather be an Indian fan, that way I don't git the
    ultimate tease. You can draw an analogy of the Red Sox fan sittin at
    the front row of the strip joint, eyes a-ga-ga at Marina, knowin' it
    cain never be, while the Indian fan sits a-chortlin' in a different
    joint watching and cringin' at Roseanne Barr, but not givin' a damn.
    
    HTH
    
29.1093wait til next year baby.........WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Tue Apr 14 1992 13:481
    
29.1094Yanks will sink like TitanicCTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 14 1992 13:547
    Jump on that Yankee bandwagon!
    
    Patience. We'll see what the dog days of August hold for the Yanks.
    In fact, go Yanks, beat dem Jays.
    
    MikeL
    
29.1095Appreciate the moment...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Apr 14 1992 15:1422
    Not finishing last since the 1930s or whatever is not something to be
    terribly proud of.  Obviously there are a lot of circumstances involved
    there that have nothing to do with the Red Sox.  However, finishing
    with a winning record in 23 or 24 of the last 25 years has got to be
    worth something.  At the very least, it means that if you're a Red Sox
    fan and you buy a ticket before the season starts chances are you'll 
    see some decent baseball from the home team.  Hey, anyone can be a
    frontrunner and claim to be a big fan after the championship is won,
    but at least the Red Sox give a reason to go out to the park and hold
    out some hope, however slim, almost every year. 
    
    Anyone who compares Red Sox fans with Carolina fans either hasn't spent 
    enough time in New England or has completely missed the boat.  For any
    given rate of success short of a championship win, the Red Sox are the
    least appreciated team in baseball, bar none (unless you consider having
    something to gripe about a metric of appreciation, which some do).  
    According to the Boston radio talk shows and their call-in fans, the 
    1992 season is already over.  It really has to be heard to be believed...
    
    glenn
      
29.1096CUPMK::DEVLINGoodbye Loooooiiieeeee!Tue Apr 14 1992 15:1729
Rich -

My point of view stems, in part, to my personal competitive feelings.

It was 'nice' to be on a contending team - but once we one that first 
champeenship - I knew what if felt like.   There's no shame in giving one's
best and falling short.  But nothing beats a champeenship.  In the long run,
teams I ran for that finished 2nd are not much different than those that finished
4th.  But the champeenship teams.  Those live on in memory forever.

There's not much solance in being near the top every year.  Sure, for a 
team like Atlanta - last year was GREAT.  But if for the next 3-4 years they
are competitive, but not champeens - it will be a disappointment.

It's kind of why folks (unnamed) criticize the NYMETS of athe last decade
of being underachievers, etc - yet they have a champeenship.  As a Mets fan -
I can handle the 2nd places, the 1988 loss to the Dodgers - because of that
1986 champeenship.  

I'm sure Twins fans don't mind a few bad years - if they win two world
champeenships in 5 years.

I think many Sox fans have become complacent - and perhaps that is a trend
that  permeates the whole organization.  

As a Sox fan, I find the 3 eastern champeenships in the last few years as 
nice - but unfullfilling.  

JD
29.1097RDOVAX::BRAKETue Apr 14 1992 15:337
    re Glenn - Nicely put.
    
    re JD - Also nicely put. I can understand where your coming from much
    better. 
    
    Rich
    
29.1098It's the end of the world as we know itCOBRA::BRYDIEThat's when I reach for my revolverWed Apr 15 1992 16:069
  
     I read in this morning's Boston Globe that you can now buy Evian
    water for two bucks a pop at Fenway's concession stands. I guess those 
    guys simulating the mattress mambo with the inflatable dolls build up 
    quite a thirst and nothing will slake it like a nice cold bottle of
    yuppie water.
  
    
29.1099Think about itSCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 15 1992 16:093
"Evian" spelled backwards is ...


29.1100Dickstah's an asset, in case Donnie Wahlberg causes trouble again...SASE::SZABOWewease Bawabbas!Wed Apr 15 1992 16:479
    re: Evian at Fenway
    
    Hey, that just might the solution to Dickstah's bladder control
    problems.  Instead of guzzling Fenway brews, he cain sip Evians!
    Tell me, do they have complimentary lime wedges, or will Dickstah have
    to bring his own?
    
    Hawk :-)
    
29.1101Your ashtray = my urinalMCIS1::DHAMELTreated like a king. Rodney KingWed Apr 15 1992 17:0412
    
    How much Evian you gonna have stashed in the back of that #$%^box wagon
    of yours in the parking lot, Hawk?  I hear the parking lot attendants
    (The Boyz in the Hood) can be bought off with with a six of the stuff
    if you throw in some firm brie. (Watery brie gets yer tires slashed.)
    
    I'll bring the stone-ground whole-wheat crackers and the paper
    umbrullas for the cocktails.  Do you prefer red or white wine for
    the spritzers?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1102AXIS::ROBICHAUDIBelieveReebokCommercialsSipThu Apr 23 1992 16:295
	The Brewhas cancelled the game 'cuz it was too cold?  Main, if 
beisboll keeps this up they're gonna catch up wif' soccer on the 
testosterone chart.

				/Don
29.1103WimpsSCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Apr 23 1992 17:212
       I heard it was only in the 40s! That's baseball for ya!
                                  Denny
29.1104Many :-)'sWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDONBO,DANBO,AND ROBERTBO...Thu Apr 23 1992 17:3328
    
    
    
               The story I heard this morning was that Wade Boggs was the
    man who had the game cancelled, aparently a old friend of his was in
    the stands w/o any underwear on. ???? Just something I heard...
    
              
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    :-)
    Chappy....
29.1105Go back to the Stankees notes fileWMOIS::FASSETT_EThu Apr 23 1992 19:425
    Hey FauxChap- It was King George III that was in the stands with no
    undies on, he wanted to see a real baseball team so he flew in to see
    the Red Sox. 
    
    
29.1106AXIS::ROBICHAUDIBelieveReebokCommercialsSipThu Apr 23 1992 19:434
    	If he wanted to see real baseball he should've taken in a National
    League game.
    
    				/Don
29.1107? ? ? ? ? ? 7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Fri May 01 1992 01:4421
    
    Right about now, the Bo'sox are 3 games behind the division (?)
    leaders.
    
    General consensus (how do you spell dad word anyhow?) is they are
    playing terribly - mostly with no hitting.  Naturally, the Manager,
    one Bruce Hobsin is saying wait till it warm up and you'll see the
    hits.
    
    Do we have any body here who knows what kind of April history the
    Bo'sox
    usually have?
    
    What's their (and Roger's too) dastistical performance been in Arril?
    
    deen to wonk
    
    I remain,
    mebbey getting interested in baizeball,
    Kev
    
29.1108RUGBY1::wayAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownFri May 01 1992 12:0520
They're five back as of yesterday.  Since I read the morning paper when
I got home from work (most days) and since we don't have a decent evening
paper (The Hartford Times went out of business years ago 8^( much to everyone's
dismay) my stats are only as good as yesterday morning.


I think Hobson is doing some wishful thinking.


In fact, I'm about to add Jack Clark to my "Most Useless Athletes of All
Time Club".  At least that way John "Sweet Boy" Cullen will have some
company.


It's May now.  I guess if we have a cooler than normal summer the Sox
will finish the season about 25 back, right?



'Saw
29.1109USCTR2::NAHEARNFri May 01 1992 12:5811
    The Sox (RED) will win the World Series this year!!!  Hobson is
    right...the hits will come....they'll go on a tear and leave everybody
    eating their dust!!!!
    
    
    I have it on good authority that the above WILL happen!!!  
    
    
    Heard This Here,
    
    Nelly
29.1110PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri May 01 1992 13:329
29.1111CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!!Fri May 01 1992 13:419
Hey Mac, thanks for your unbridled, continued optimism.  8^)

The prevailing sentiment right now in Boston is that the Sox are severely 
limited due to lack of team speed.  I think the truth is somwhere between 
them being a .500 team, and them breezing to a divisional win.  I don't know
their records, but my recallection is that they often start slow, and just 
when you think they are out of it...

=Bob=
29.1112CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownFri May 01 1992 13:437
Toronto looks hard to catch.

One can only hope that, like a marathoner who bolts out of the gate with
a blistering pace, they will falter somewhere along the way.


'Saw
29.1113DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEFri May 01 1992 13:4411
    Does Jack Clark have *ANY* hits yet? If he takes time getting started,
    why don't the Sox send him down to Pawtucket to get it out of his
    system? With the large # of LOB's the Sox have had, this guy is part of
    the problem.
    
    Read that Roger's ERA is about 1.5 yet he is 3-2. Leads league in SO's.
    Sure hope the team starts hitting for him. Doesn't he usually have
    about 10-11 wins by the AS break? 
    
    Rich
    
29.1114CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!!Fri May 01 1992 13:463
The LOBs are the bain of the Sox existance.  NOBODY is hitting with men on base.
Such was the case lasted year too.  I dunno what a manager can do about that.

29.1115SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri May 01 1992 14:015
    re:LOB
       Take Greenwell the other night. Pitcher walks the bases loaded,
    cain't find the plate with a telescope. So what does Greeny do? HE
    SWINGS AT THE FIRST PITCH!!!...and grounds out!  What an oaf!
                                          Denny
29.1116CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownFri May 01 1992 14:1217
>       Take Greenwell the other night. Pitcher walks the bases loaded,
>    cain't find the plate with a telescope. So what does Greeny do? HE
>    SWINGS AT THE FIRST PITCH!!!...and grounds out!  What an oaf!


That's a HABIT with him in pressure situations.  I heard either Remy
or Monty talking about it earlier this season.  With men on, and potential
scoring situations he ALWAYS swings at the first pitch.

That's curable too.  If I were Butch, for the next month in those situations
I'd find him $100 for every time he swings at the first pitch.  If he
does it and hits a homer, I'd fine him $200....


8^)

'Saw
29.1117SASE::SZABOFri May 01 1992 14:3116
 >      Take Greenwell the other night. Pitcher walks the bases loaded,
 >  cain't find the plate with a telescope. So what does Greeny do? HE
 >  SWINGS AT THE FIRST PITCH!!!...and grounds out!  What an oaf!

    I agree, that he's an oaf for swinging at the first pitch.  But, what
    should he have done in this situation, after taking the 1st pitch or 2?
    In other words, should he be looking for the walk, especially since the
    pitcher was wild, or should he be looking for a hit regardless?  And,
    if he should've been looking for the walk for the easy run and bases
    loaded still, isn't this what Boggs has been critisized so much for
    over the years (ie. no guts to go for the 2+ runs scored hit)?
    
    Just wondering...
    
    Hawk
    
29.1118CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownFri May 01 1992 14:4014
Kwak,

See my earlier reply.  With Greenwell, this is a problem.  He swings at the
first pitch regardless of whether it's a good pitch or not.

One could accept it if the first pitch was borderline, but I've seen
him go golfing up there, with men on, and a low first pitch.

Obviously, you have to take the situation into account.  Hobson should
be having the Gerbil giving him the take sign on the first pitch anyway,
if the pitcher has been wild...


'Saw
29.1119Too Much!SHALOT::MEDVIDWho's got segmented eyes?Fri May 01 1992 14:5810
    RE: Greenwell swinging with bags loaded
    
    Weren't you guys just last week getting on Boggs for looking for the
    walk instead of swinging the bat to try to get the game winner?  Said
    he wasn't a team player if I do remember correctly.
    
    BoSox fans can find fault in anything.  
    
    	--dan'l
    
29.1120SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri May 01 1992 15:084
       What we're saying dan'l is Greenwell always swings at the first
    pitch. Even if it's in the backstop. The pitcher was throwing nothing
    but balls, but he's swingin' anyway.
                                  Denny
29.1121CNTROL::CHILDSVanilla Trainwreck-What a Band!Fri May 01 1992 15:0810
 No Dan-l and Kwah that was I finding fault with Boggs not the faithful. Big
 difference....

 ;^)  the smiling anti-

 for the record Clemens' best month is April over his entire career. Makes
 sense less pressure in April....

 mike
29.1122CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownFri May 01 1992 15:0916
No, we're not complaining about Greenwell swinging.

Read my keystrokes 8^) :


	Greenwell has a neurotic/phobic tendency, with men on base,
	in scoring and/or pressure situations, to swing indiscriminantly
	at the first pitch, whether it is hittable, or would plow the
	guy with the orange wig behind home plate square in the forehaid.


I don't know 'bout anyone else in here, but that is what I'm griping about.
That behavior is not good baseball.  


'Saw
29.1123CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownFri May 01 1992 15:1017
> for the record Clemens' best month is April over his entire career. Makes
> sense less pressure in April....

Mikey, Mikey, Mikey.....


April is the freshest month.  His arm has come out of the hibernation over
the winter (where it only got exercised swinging at cops) and so his
"heat" is there.  

From April onward, his arm will slowly get more and more tired.  

For a pitcher like Clemens or Ryan, the season is like a marathon.....



'Saw
29.1124CNTROL::CHILDSVanilla Trainwreck-What a Band!Fri May 01 1992 15:1515
> April is the freshest month.  His arm has come out of the hibernation over
> the winter (where it only got exercised swinging at cops) and so his
> "heat" is there.  

> From April onward, his arm will slowly get more and more tired.  

  Looks like Saw agrees with me that Clemens is nothing more than a thrower
  of heat.

  ;^)

  mikey

  ps. Saw wasn't Clemens as hot as pistol last september until the big clutch
      game to tie the Jays for the division lead?
29.1125CAMONE::WAYAt 6', 245, from Parts UnknownFri May 01 1992 15:2117
>  Looks like Saw agrees with me that Clemens is nothing more than a thrower
>  of heat.

Hey, Roger's obvious strength is his fastball.  I think he's improved
as a pitcher over his career, but you have to remember you're talking
to a guy who couldn't pitch if his life depended on it.....


>  ps. Saw wasn't Clemens as hot as pistol last september until the big clutch
>      game to tie the Jays for the division lead?

You could be right.  I honestly don't remember.  He does have a history
of "Doing the Snuffy(tm)" in big games....


'Saw

29.1126One day, perhaps, Greenwell will surprise youSHALOT::HUNTHappy Happy, Joy JoyFri May 01 1992 15:4111
 I used to constantly bitch and moan about Garry Maddox's perpetual habit
 of swinging at the very first pitch every single damn time he was up ...
 
 Over and over again, stranding hundreds, no thousands, no millions of
 Phillie baserunners at the very worst of possible times ...
 
 ... until the top of the 10th inning of Game 5 of the 1980 NLCS against
 the Astros when he stroked the pennant winner up the middle on Joe
 Sambito's very first pitch to him.
 
 Bob Hunt
29.1127PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri May 01 1992 15:416
29.1128SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri May 01 1992 15:506
    'Sides, a REAL pitcher would lose almost every start, but be
    unstoppable if his team somehow made it to the playoffs, right Mikie?
    
    :*)
    
    lEe
29.1129I axe again, only clearer, I thinks...SASE::SZABOFri May 01 1992 15:5313
    You guys missed my point.  I agree that it was stupid to swing at the
    1st pitch.  What I was wondering about, is what you guys felt he should
    be doing in this situation, especially had he taken that 1st pitch. 
    Since the pitcher was wild, should Greenwell have gone for the walk and
    a sure run with a bases-loaded situation for the next batter, or,
    should he have been looking for a multiple-run hit (after taking a
    pitch or 2, of course)?  And, if it's the former, then how does this
    differ from what Boggs has been highly critisized for?
    
    Mikey "Voodoo" Childs need not reply....  :-)
    
    Hawk
    
29.1130AXIS::ROBICHAUDIBelieveReebokCommercialsSipFri May 01 1992 15:564
    	Squak, it's very simple.  Greenteeth should not swing at the
    first pitch, but Boggs should.  Got it?  
    
    				/Don
29.1131SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri May 01 1992 16:107
    >            <<< Note 29.1127 by PATE::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll" >>>
>    This has been shown to be a myth many times.  First becasue noone
>    really has a good definition of "big game", and second because his
>    stats show he is pretty consistent and are decent in post-season play.
       I find this hard to believe. I cain't remember Clemens winning many
    post season games. And I'm NOT a Clemmensbasher. Got any stats?
                                  Denny
29.1132April & Sept = Clemens' best months...MEIS::SIKESFri May 01 1992 16:1523
Re:.1121 

> for the record Clemens' best month is April over his entire career. Makes
> sense less pressure in April....

I don't have last year's numbers handy, but Sept/Oct looks pretty good for
Clemens also.......

 Clemens' career statistics through 1990.....    

                          W -  L  ERA
 Before All-Star break   65 - 30  3.11
  After All-Star break   51 - 21  2.58

                April    18 -  6  2.30
                May      22 - 10  3.15
                June     20 - 10  3.52
                July     19 - 10  2.71
                August   20 -  9  3.23
                Sept/Oct 17 -  6  2.19
                         


29.1133can't keep a good file downCNTROL::CHILDSUp thru the cracks, out thru da broken glassFri May 01 1992 16:454
 Hahahahahaha  the last twenty = BROKENRECORD.COM

  ;^) TGIF
29.1134PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri May 01 1992 16:467
29.1135AXIS::ROBICHAUDIBelieveReebokCommercialsSipFri May 01 1992 16:514
    	Mike Childs is secretly a Clemens lover.  Matter of fack he
    paid $200.00 for the limited edition poster of Roger and Wade. 
    
    				/Don
29.1136PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri May 01 1992 16:5786
    I couldn't find his post-season numbers, but here a are a copy of good
    notes with some facts on Clemens:
    
              <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                          -< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 108.690                      Roger Clemens                       690 of 767
NAC::G_WAUGAMAN                                      34 lines  18-MAR-1992 14:29
        -< Clemens' shortcomings in postseason greatly exaggerated... >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     
    Ken, we've been through this many times before.  Clemens' postseason
    record is average, but it's not horrendous.  People remember the bad 
    games and ignore the good ones.  They forget the 1986 ALCS Game 4 where
    Roger went 8+ and Schiraldi blew the game in dramatic fashion.  They 
    forget the 1986 ALCS Game 7 win.  They forget the strong, very winnable 
    1986 WS Game 6 (7 IP, 1 ER).  They forget that even if he did give up 
    the stupid HR to Canseco in 1988 ALCS Game 2 that it was still another 
    quality start that was handed over to the bullpen to lose.  They 
    remember the Cooney thumb but they forget that Clemens handed a 1-0 
    lead to the bullpen in a much more important Game 1 (the Sox weren't 
    down, 3 games to none) only to have the pen completely collapse once 
    again, not a week removed from Clemens coming off the deck after a 
    month's inactivity to shut Toronto down in a crucial last-weekend 
    divisional game (still one of the biggest thrills I've had at the 
    ballpark).
    
    In eight postseason games, Clemens has had three poor outings
    (counting the Cooney game), and five strong if not brilliant ones.  
    If credit could be granted solely on the basis of individual
    performance, Clemens would be 5-3, which at .625 is not far from what
    is expected from even the game's best pitchers (also keep in mind that
    in each series, with the possible exception of California in 1986, 
    Clemens was up against the teams considered to have the finest offenses
    in baseball).  As it stands, he's won one game and lost two with 5
    no-decisions, the no-decisions in particular due to absolutely 
    horrendous bullpen performances. 
    
    Again, if you want to see postseason mediocrity, take a look at Dwight
    Gooden's record.  Gooden is the consensus *second* greatest pitcher in 
    baseball over the span of the Clemens/Gooden careers. 
    
    glenn
    
    
              <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                          -< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 108.753                      Roger Clemens                       753 of 767
ASABET::FREDRICKSON                                  34 lines   6-APR-1992 12:43
                           -< Note: quiz at bottom >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Clemens appears on the cover of last week's USA TODAY BASEBALL 
    WEEKLY as "the dominant pitcher of his era." 
    
    They compare his numbers over the past six years (1986-91) to 
    the rest of the 10 winningest pitchers over that time, and no 
    one is really even close. 
    
    Clemens is 118-52 over this period, 14 more wins than second-place 
    Dave Stewart (who is 104-61). Only Dwight Gooden has a better 
    winning percentage (.695-.694), but he also has 27 fewer wins 
    (91-40). This sells Gooden short a little because I believe Doc's 
    best year was 1985; this comparison was obviously set up with 
    Clemens' parameters (his 24-4 '86) as the starting point. 
    
    Clemens has the best ERA (2.69, with no one else under 3), has 
    averaged 19.7 wins per year (no one else is over 17.3), and he's 
    got 350 more strikeouts over this period than runner-up Frank 
    Viola (Nolan Ryan is not on the list because he hasn't won 
    enough games during this period.)
    
    The article also points out that Clemens is the first pitcher in 
    major-league history to strike out 200 or more and post a .600 
    winning percentage for six straight years. 
    
    Based on this data, the Sox now have baseball's two most 
    consistently strong starting pitchers over the last six years in 
    their rotation. While Viola is third over this period in wins 
    (103-74, one win behind Stewart), he has a better ERA than 
    Stewart (3.43 to 3.56) and more Ks (1106-964).
    
    Just for fun, a little quiz (no fair if you have the data): Name
    the 10 winningest pitchers from 1986-91 (I've given you four). 
     
    Mark 
29.1137SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri May 01 1992 17:152
       Sounds pretty good to me Mac. Better than I thought.
                                   Denny
29.1138CNTROL::CHILDSUp thru the cracks, out thru da broken glassFri May 01 1992 19:156
 looks to me like the only big win he got, he had to take a month off before
 that to rest his arm and get it ready. Must have been from throwing to many
 heaters in April...

 the smiling anti
29.1139CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingTue May 05 1992 16:384
 Does anyone know how the Red Soxs made out last night? Didn't Clemens pitch?

 ;^)
29.1140RANGER::LEFEBVREPCs 'R UsTue May 05 1992 16:404
    Ignore Mike, he'll disappear during Roger's next regularly scheduled
    gem.
    
    Mark.
29.1141KBD, Don, Mac, etc... ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingTue May 05 1992 17:093
 Mark, I never disappear unlike the choir of faithfuls I hear when Roger
 does pitch one of those rare gems who can't be heard from today.....
29.1142If Rog got some run support....SHARE::DERRYMatt 'Cy' YoungWed May 06 1992 11:361
    Hey Mikey, take a pill buddy.  (-:
29.1143PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 06 1992 15:216
29.1144CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingWed May 06 1992 16:5915
>    I'll overlook this little inaccuracy (well maybe not - where were you
>    anyway after Rog won his 3rd Cy?), and just say that if this were true,
>    we would still disappear much less frequently.


  I believe I was in here pulling for one Jim Abbott to win it last year, no?
  Sure you'd have to disappear much less frequently but given the roar I hear
  in here the silence yesterday was deafing. 

  I've been knockdown by stats, called names and had a few other things hurled
  my way in this little SDUC, I got to take my shots when I can...

  TSA
  
29.1145AXIS::ROBICHAUDIBelieveReebokCommercialsSipWed May 06 1992 18:444
    	Secretly MikeC adores Roger and wants his son to grow up just
    like him (i.e. RICH).  8^)
    
    				/Don
29.1146RANGER::LEFEBVREPCs 'R UsThu May 07 1992 18:055
    Not really an update, but the Red Sox lead 4-0 in the first after Hough 
    and Alvarez walked 6 in a row after a Herb Winningham single.  With Matt 
    Young pitching for the Red Sox, it could be a *long* afternoon.
    
    Mark.
29.11476-6, end of the thirdHBAHBA::HAASFuture Man and the SynthAxe DrumitarThu May 07 1992 19:140
29.1148Typical ALmost baseball...AXIS::ROBICHAUDARisingTideLiftsAllYachtsThu May 07 1992 19:161
    
29.1149You just gotta laugh.SHARE::DERRYMatt 'Cy' YoungFri May 08 1992 11:351
    time to change the p_name...
29.1150And I thought I was bad...CUBIC7::DIGGINSEBFSGNCNBHPFFS!Fri May 08 1992 11:578
HA HA!! I thought you were reaching a bit, just a tad mind you, in 
da firsted place Karen! Matt 'Cy' Young, hardee har har! My mother 
could make a throw from the mound to second base! 



Steve
29.1151Rumor or fact?HYDRA::HAUSRATHCarson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff'Fri May 08 1992 12:128
    
    Just heard this news flash on the Radio..  
    
    The Sox have traded Jack Clark to L.A.
    
    For 4 cops that can hit...   ta-dum.  
    
    /Jeff
29.1152Sign her upCTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!!Fri May 08 1992 13:156
Hey Digger

Is mom a righty or lefty?  More importantly, can she move a runner over and hit
in the clutch?

=Bob=
29.1153MCIS2::DHAMELDoes the LAPD have a DH?Fri May 08 1992 15:207
    
    15 walks! That's *fifteen* free baserunners!  A six run handicap given
    to them and you'd think they could get a few hits and take advantage of
    the situation, BUT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO.....
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1154Maybe she could field for Young..CUBIC7::DIGGINSEBFSGNCNBHPFFS!Fri May 08 1992 17:006
=Bob=, mom's a lefty, good arm, decent speed, no bat. 8^)



Steve
29.1155PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon May 11 1992 14:581
    What were you saying about Roger Clemens, Mike?
29.1156CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingMon May 11 1992 17:386
 Hey Roger's always been able to beat the dregs of the leagues. Why do you
 think he flew out to Cleveland earlier this year? You'll never see him
 strike out 20 batters against a top flight team....

 mike
29.1157USCTR1::NAHEARNMon May 11 1992 17:5019
    Mike,
    
    We've never seen ANYONE strike out 20 batters on ANY team, other than
    Clemens vs. the Mariners!!!
    
    
    Just thought clarification was in order!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Further, should Clemens be looked down upon for beating teams he should
    beat?
    
    Beating those that you should and going .500 vs. everyone else would
    land even you in the Hall of Fame, Mike!!!!!
    
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
29.1158PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon May 11 1992 18:075
    Mike, I thought only throwers had high K counts, while pitchers could
    get outs in other ways.  Kind of like Clemen's 4 Ks against the Royals
    and 15 groundball outs.
    
    That was Clemens' 31st career shutout.
29.1159CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingMon May 11 1992 18:127
 Not necessarily Mac. Probably means he's lost speed so the hitters are able
 to catch up with but he had good enough control to keep it low in the strike
 zone resulting in ground balls. He was probably forced to keep low by a good
 ump who wouldn't give him his legendary "gifted" high hard one....

 
29.1160CAMONE::WAYA&amp;E - the World War II channelMon May 11 1992 18:4214
> Not necessarily Mac. Probably means he's lost speed so the hitters are able
> to catch up with but he had good enough control to keep it low in the strike
> zone resulting in ground balls. He was probably forced to keep low by a good
> ump who wouldn't give him his legendary "gifted" high hard one....


How 'bout he's just a REAL good pitcher that most teams would give their
left you-know-what to have on their team 8^)


hth,
'Saw
 

29.1161CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingMon May 11 1992 19:013
 Can't argue with that Saw. Just have maintained he isn't great through
 out this LDUC....
29.1162PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon May 11 1992 19:1511
29.1163shootin' fish in a barrelPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon May 11 1992 19:204
29.1164CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingMon May 11 1992 19:2213
    
>    Someone (McRae, Hobson?) was quoted as saying Clemens didn't have his
>    best stuff that day.  As to the umpiring dig (still haven't given up on
>    that one, eh Mike?), his high hard one usually results in a swinging
>    strike, not a called one.  Alot of good pitchers "climb the ladder". 
>    And, the umps have expanded the strike zone a bit for everyone this
>    season.

 Don't know about the quote and obviously I don't care. As for the ump
 dig what's a batter to do? If the first pitch is high and called a strike
 you may as well swing instead of paying a six pack fine for going down not
 swinging. Agreed pitchers climb the ladder. The last line says it all now
 "everyone" not just his Highness is getting a bigger strike zone....
29.1165CNTROL::CHILDSCities crumble, George does nothingMon May 11 1992 19:296
 Not many great ones out there these days Mac. Viola, Morris and Hershier
 are about the only ones I can think of. Great equals mixing stuff and 
 winning big ones....

 mike
29.1166ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon May 11 1992 19:354
    Toss in Saberhagen to that mix.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1167PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon May 11 1992 19:512
    And Clemens has outperformed all of them.  The only exception is in
    post season play and that's because he didn't have the supporting cast.
29.1168HOGWASHACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon May 11 1992 20:0312
    Clemens got shellacked pretty good in game 1 of the 1986 playoffs,
    couldn't hold a lead in late game 2 of the 1988 playoffs, did ok but not
    great in game 2 of the 1986 WS. Only game he pitched well and won was
    game 7 of 1986 playoffs, and pitched well in game 6 of the 1986 WS.
    I am not sure how much supporting cast really has to do with
    post-season performance. Hershiser in 1988 had a worst supporting cast
    then Clemens had in 1986 or 1988. 
    
    I think I got the years right.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1169JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasMon May 11 1992 20:205
    Red Sox notesfile reports that Mo Vaughn has been sent down to
    Pawtucket (Mike Brumley was called up to take his place on the roster).
    
    
    py
29.1170numbers...numbers....numbers.....7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeTue May 12 1992 12:419
    
    Cain anybody tell me how Roger's ~1.32ERA compares to all the other
    pitchers?  I thought I heard that Nolan Ryan's era is somewhere around
    32.x.
    
    I remain,
    chopping mo wood for da fire!,
    Kev
    
29.1171ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue May 12 1992 13:1912
    
    Clemens	1.89
    
    The two hottest pitchers in the AL, one getting no support...
    
    Appier	1.40
    Krueger	1.62
    
    Ryan	8.59
    Plunk	0.00  \
    Wickander	0.00   -- couldn't resist
    Power 	0.93  /                  
29.1172EARRTH::BROOKSI am the margin of error.Tue May 12 1992 15:571
    ROGUR HAS FEE SIGH YUNGS!!!!! HE AINT TWO BLAM !
29.1173DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEMon May 18 1992 20:4517
    What's the consensus up North about Tony Pena? Has he reached a point
    where his defense no longer cancels his offensive liabilities?
    
    The reason I ask is that I recently caught thye PawSox in a series here
    with the Braves (Richmond) and Eric Wedge looks like he is finally
    living up to the potential he had coming out of Wichita St. He threw
    out one of the fastest guys in the IL (Ramon Carabella) on a sweet
    throw to 2nd, is hitting over .320, had 5 or 6 homers and a bunch of
    RBI's. He took one of the Braves biggest pitching prospects, David
    Nied, deep over the LF fence - a mammoth shot. 
    
    Also, sat next to, and spoke a lot to, Daryl Irvine's dad. Irvine had
    two saves in the series and looked real sharp. Nice to see Rico wearing
    his old #6 again.
    
    Rich
    
29.1174A year awaySALES::THILLMon May 18 1992 20:538
    I think they don't want to rush Wedge up to the bigs just yet. The plan
    was for him to spend a whole year in AAA. They figure Pena can still do 
    it, but he's definitely slowing down. It might make a good trasition to 
    have them share the catching duties next year, with Wedge eventually 
    taking over once he's ready. Wedge can learn a lot about pitch
    selection, how to handle the staff, etc. rom Pena.
    
    Tom 
29.1175Wedge - catcher of the futureCTHQ2::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna HAVE a sister!!!Mon May 18 1992 20:5411
re: Pena

Pena seems to have pretty much lost it at the plate - he can't seem to get 
around anymore.  He even seems to have lost a little in the throwing department, 
even though it is tough to tell with the Sox inability to hold runners.

I think that there is a good chance that at the end of this year, when his 
contract is up, the Sox will turn to Wedge as their #1 catcher.  They seem to 
want him to have a full year in Triple A before calling him up.

=Bob=
29.1176FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue May 19 1992 12:369
    The Globe hypothesized this past weekend that Pena would be gone at the
    end of this season, probably to the Marlins, for promotional and PR
    purposes among Miami's large Latino population.  It's possible he may
    get sent to a pennant contender at the end of this season if the Sox
    are out of it but that's my own gut feeling.  I feel their catchers of
    the immediate future will be Wedge and Flaherty with Marzano probably
    being the odd man out.
    
    John
29.1177RANGER::LEFEBVRERed eye gravy and possum fatTue May 19 1992 15:494
    Although Pena hasn't many hits this year, most of them have resulted in
    big runs.
    
    Mark.
29.1178PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue May 19 1992 16:572
    Wedge wasn't able to beat out an injured Marzano and a non-name John
    Flaherty in spring training.  The time in Pawtucket will do him good.
29.1179DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKETue May 19 1992 18:2711
    Thanks for the update, guys. I did see Wedge in AAA last year and he
    looks much better this time around. He was very tentative with the bat
    then. Now, he strides up, looking nasty and putting up some good
    numbers.
    
    Sad to see John Shelby hanging on with Pawtucket. He just doesn't have
    it any more. And, for those of you who remember Wayne Housie from last
    year, he is slumping big time. 
    
    Rich
    
29.1180JARETH::YANKOWSKASFIRST PLACE ORIOLESTue May 19 1992 18:5815
    Question -- did Wedge appear in any games for the Red Sox in late
    September last year?  
    
    If not, he'll likely spend all of 1992 at Pawtucket.  
    
    Reason: the expansion draft for the new Miami and Colorado NL teams
    takes place at the end of this season. One of the expansion draft rules
    states that any player who has appeared *in even one big league game*
    can be selected if he's not protected.  Minor leaguers who have never
    played in a big league game and have less than three years professional
    experience (four years if the player was under 18 when he signed)
    aren't eligible to be taken in expansion.
    
    
    py 
29.1181NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue May 19 1992 19:1613
                                                   
    > Question -- did Wedge appear in any games for the Red Sox in late
    > September last year?  
    
    Yes, he did-- but it doesn't really matter, as Wedge was drafted out of
    college in 1989 and is playing in his fourth season in the minors.  I 
    expect that the Red Sox will protect Wedge and leave all their other 
    catchers unprotected.  If they protect Pena and/or Marzano over Wedge, 
    they're making a big mistake.  Wedge is the only catcher in the system 
    with any indication that he can hit even a lick...
    
    glenn
    
29.1182DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKETue May 19 1992 19:214
    Bob Geren is also on the Pawtucket roster.........
    
    Rich
    
29.1183AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 21 1992 16:315
    	Why are the Red Sox so concerned about Mo Vaughn's friendship
    with Jack Clark?  Is Butch Hobson overreacting 'cuz he hung around
    with a group of pothaids in the late 70's?
    
    				/Don
29.1184Much ado about nothing, imoNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu May 21 1992 16:5024
                     
    > Why are the Red Sox so concerned about Mo Vaughn's friendship
    > with Jack Clark?  Is Butch Hobson overreacting 'cuz he hung around
    > with a group of pothaids in the late 70's?
    
    I've only heard very vague reference made to this friendship being a
    problem, but I tend to think it's just media b.s. (that's mainly taken 
    on a life of its own under the guidance of one Eddie Andelman).  I heard 
    an interview with Butch Hobson and he seemed to indicate that clubhouse 
    ties or behavior had nothing to do with Vaughn's demotion.  On the other 
    hand, Hobson doesn't seem to want to come out of his shell yet and be 
    direct or straightforward about anything with the media.
    
    I've grown very tired of Andelman's act on the Red Sox.  He effectively
    goaded and used Vaughn, who was in a delicate situation as it was with 
    his recent comments on his demotion, to promote his own cynical agenda.
    Result: more bad press for Mo, even though he did nothing more than try
    to explain himself in response to some very loaded questions.  But not
    to worry, if the Red Sox continue their recent improved play and move
    into first place, Eddie'll bury the hatchet, claim again that he's 
    "just a fan", and all will be well again in the love affair with the Sox...
    
    glenn
        
29.1185AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 21 1992 17:405
    	Glenn, the comments about Vaughn's friendship with Clark being
    a problem came from Mo's mouth himself.  Not a newspaper quote,
    but a teevee interview.
    
    				/Don
29.1186Mrs Clark?DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEThu May 21 1992 17:484
    So, I mean, who IS a friend of Jack Clark?
    
    Rich
    
29.1187NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu May 21 1992 18:1514
    
   > Glenn, the comments about Vaughn's friendship with Clark being
   > a problem came from Mo's mouth himself.  Not a newspaper quote,
   > but a teevee interview.
    
    What'd he say?  I missed that (that's what I meant by I'd only heard 
    vague references).  Was he responding to what was reported in the
    papers or what Butch told him directly?  If the latter, I agree; that's
    pretty low of Hobson.  I mean, the Red Sox and some of the writers have
    constantly been trying to tell us what a great guy and a leader Clark 
    is (seriously), so then they'd tell a rook to stay away?
    
    glenn
    
29.1188Huh?PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 21 1992 18:270
29.1189Score?DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEWed May 27 1992 13:214
    How'd the Sox do vs the Angels lasted night?
    
    Rich
    
29.1190Sox winPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 27 1992 13:284
29.1191DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEWed May 27 1992 14:124
    Thanks, Mac. How many saves is Reardon behind Fingers now? 
    
    Rich
    
29.1192PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 27 1992 14:164
29.1193Lee's a favorite of mine...SASE::SZABODangerous neophyte technoweenieWed May 27 1992 14:246
    re: Lee Smith
    
    Why cain't the Sox get guys like that?  :-)
    
    Hawk
    
29.1194JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed May 27 1992 14:598
    re .1192:
    
    Lee Smith is still 11-12 career saves behind Reardon.  Unless Reardon
    gets injured or the Sox go on a horrendous losing streak, he should
    pass Fingers first.
    
    
    py
29.1195AXIS::ROBICHAUDWed May 27 1992 16:025
    	Rich, Mike Greenwell finally got his first extra base hit of
    the season (May 26th).  Watching them hit and run the bases is a
    great sleep aid (almost as good as the WLAF).
    
    				/Don
29.1196JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed May 27 1992 16:127
    > Mike Greenwell finally got his first extra base hit of the season (May
    > 26th).
    
    Now he's got as many as Dave Eiland.  :-)
    
    
    py
29.1197PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 27 1992 16:175
    For Mike C. ~/~ :
    
    Clemens is now 7-3, tied with Jack McDowell for the lead in wins. 
    He leads the league in ERA (1.65), innings, strikeouts, shutouts 
    and complete games. 
29.1198was a nothin' game, tho Mac! 8^)CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed May 27 1992 16:251
    
29.1199Ojeda couldn't believe itSHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightWed May 27 1992 16:378
29.1200SASE::SZABODangerous neophyte technoweenieWed May 27 1992 16:395
    Yabbut(tm), it's steel Spring, Mac.  Roger's steel strong from the long
    Winter's rest.  Let's see how he's doing in August...
    
    Hawk, for Mikey :-)
    
29.1201PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 27 1992 16:492
    Apparently Greenie's extrabasehitless streak was through 98 ABs
    stretching all the way to last September!
29.1202nothing more to add to those replies which say it allCNTROL::CHILDS&quot;I'll get briefed up on that&quot; hahahaaaWed May 27 1992 17:032
 thanks guys  ;^)
29.1203\DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEWed May 27 1992 17:5927
    I read where Greenwell was on the DL for awhile. Is there a physical
    problem with him?
    
    re Clemens
    
    Because he is outspoken, brash and confident, some folks will never
    give him the respect he deserves as one of the finest pitchers of this
    era.
    
    Perhaps these same Clemens-bashers would have found fault with the
    likes of Dizzy Dean, Joe DiMaggio (holdout), Ty Cobb and Leo Durocher
    for some of the same reasons. 
    
    I either dislike a guy personally or like him. I either think a guy is
    a bad ball player, a so-so ballplayer, a good ballplayer or a great
    balplayer. Because I don't admire a guy's personality doesn't mean I
    can't appreciate his stature as a pitcher.
    
    If Clemens was not the talent he is, I don't think he would be as
    outspoken (read: perceived rude) as he his. But he knows that, because
    of his talent, his voice will be listened to so he speaks out when he
    deems it necessary. I may not agree with what he has to say alot, I am
    really ticked that he never answered a ltter from my microBrake, but I
    respect what he does on the field.
    
    Rich
    
29.1204PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed May 27 1992 18:1610
29.1205FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed May 27 1992 18:3317
    You really shouldn't be pissed when a player doesn't answer his mail. 
    The volume of mail these guys get is sometimes beyond comprehension and
    they need full time help just to keep up with it.  I wouldn't be
    surprised if Clemens gets over 100 letters a day.  I don't think
    anyone, no matter how rich and famous, should be expected to keep up
    with that kind of volume.
    
    I don't know how many fan letters even get read, due to volume and also
    because a lot of them are folks asking for something.
    
    I do know that in some cases the secretaries in a team's front office
    know how to come close to writing a player's signature and they'll sign
    the requests for autographs, so even if you do get an answer and an
    autograph it isn't even necessarily from your hero, whoever that hero
    is.
    
    John                     
29.1206CAMONE::WAYTwo Bullets and a LadyWed May 27 1992 18:4215
>    I do know that in some cases the secretaries in a team's front office
>    know how to come close to writing a player's signature and they'll sign
>    the requests for autographs, so even if you do get an answer and an
>    autograph it isn't even necessarily from your hero, whoever that hero
>    is.
    
You mean my Will Carling could be a fake???????


Oh, how will I cope?


;^)

'Saw
29.1207FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed May 27 1992 18:539
    That's right, it could be.  The collectibles business is full of scams.
    
    Rich, I apologize if I came down hard on you for being ticked off at
    Clemens.  I wasn't trying to defend just Roger, but if an athlete did
    everything the fans wanted him to, he'd have no time for a family life,
    between answering fan mail, signing autographs and doing personal
    appearances.  Heck, he'd barely have time to practice or play.
    
    John
29.1208I like the bad boy image...SASE::SZABODangerous neophyte technoweenieWed May 27 1992 19:0511
    I hated Clemens years ago for his contract baloney, but have since
    forgotten about it because of the commonplaceness of broken contracts
    for more money in the wonderful world of professional sports business. 
    I actually like him now, not because I've forgiven his greediness, but
    because I've taken a liking towards the bad boy types.  And, I thought
    Mikey C. was on the bad boy bandwagon too, which is why I don't 
    understaind why he don't like Roger like me and the Slasher.  C'mon
    Mikey, Roger Clemens ain't no Hulk Hogan! :-)
    
    Hawk
    
29.1209LUNER::BROOKSI'm too sexy for this note ...Wed May 27 1992 19:361
    Then you guys ought to idolize me .....
29.1210CAMONE::WAYTwo Bullets and a LadyWed May 27 1992 19:3711
>    Then you guys ought to idolize me .....


Doc, there's bad, and then there's BAD, and then there's bad attempts
at being bad.

I'll let the rest of the noters decide  8^) 8^) 8^)


'Saw

29.1211TORREY::MAY_BRAngels redefine the term 'road trip'Wed May 27 1992 19:433
    
    Doc, Roger has at least one redeeming quality.  Schools still out on
    you...
29.1212PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 27 1992 19:502
    I didn't think Roger broke any contract.  I thought he just held out
    when his contract expired until a new one to his liking was written up.
29.1213DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEWed May 27 1992 20:3624
    John - my miniBrake's letter was written back in January following an
    appearance here in Richmond at a card show by Roger. To make a long
    story short, the folks who put the show on ensured that we couldn't
    even get a glimpse of Clemens unless we forked over $26. I know the
    pressure pro athletes are under and I know the unscrupulous collectors
    who take advantage of the goodwill exhibited by some players but it was
    a really nice letter explaining how much the mini guy admired him and
    was sorry he couldn't afford to "see" him. (Actually, MacroBrake was
    too cheap).
    
    I guess I kind of expected a reply since it was during the off-season
    and I knew he wasn't due in spring training for about 4 weeks.
    
    So, although irrational, I'll remain a bit ticked.
    
    BTW - What a difference here in Tripple A land. The Richmond Braves
    revel in coming out early to sighn autographs. Last year, miniBrake got
    Keith Mitchell, Mark Wohlers, Brian Hunter and Cabrera's autographs.
    R-Bravbe mgr Phil Niekro refused to come out, though. These guys get
    such a kick out of the adulation afforded them by the kids. Just love
    it.
    
    Rich
    
29.1214ROYALT::ASHEYou'll dance to anything...Wed May 27 1992 20:523
    So if I send a card down to Leonard Russell to sign, what's the chance
    that Ninj will sign it for him?
    
29.1215FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed May 27 1992 21:0124
    Not much, since I'm no good at forging signatures and can barely write
    my own.  I take the 5th on whether someone else will sign it for him.
    
    Rich, I don't blame you for not paying the money so microBrake could
    meet Roger.  If you write to the team during the off-season, it may be a
    while before the athlete gets the mail.  If you write to the athlete's
    home, he's probably being flooded by mail there too.  There are books
    out for autograph collectors that give the off-season addresses of many
    of the players to make it easier for these guys to get tracked down.
    
    Athletes probably have bills and checks sent to their agents, have a
    private PO Box for family and friends and I wouldn't be surprised if
    they trash everything else that comes to their homes.  Seriously.  They
    have to do something to protect what little privacy they have left and
    probably would have to hire someone to help them keep up with their fan
    mail if they chose to answer it.
    
    Finally, as far as guys in the minors go, most of them probably will
    never make the majors so they are enjoying the adulation while they're
    getting it.  Once they get to the majors and experience it, some of
    them become jaded and I think to a certain extent it becomes more of a
    pain than a pleasure after a while.  
    
    John                            
29.1216SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu May 28 1992 10:496
    What Ninj says is true.  That's how I've had to handle it.  I used to
    reply to ALL autograph requests, but now I just trash most of them as I
    just don't have the time.  Afterall, I'd probably have to miss "Home
    Improvement" and "Northern Exposure" if I tried to reply to all.
    
    lEe
29.1217A new angleCTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu May 28 1992 13:097
    HAHAHA lEe,
    If ya signed it LT, mebbe some young'uns would think it's Lawrence
    Taylor. Think of the dosh you could make!
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
29.1218Sox win first 2 on dreaded West Coast tripPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 28 1992 13:144
    Reardon blew his first save of the season last night, but got the W
    while Darwin got his second save as the Sox win in the 10th 4-3 on a
    clutch RBI BB by Jack Clark ;^).  Viola pitched fairly well only giving
    up 2 runs on 2 solo HRs.
29.1219DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEThu May 28 1992 13:3016
    Mac - thanks for posting the game results. 
    
    On autographs
    
    I know that professional collectors have ruined the practice for the
    kids. I recall going to a card shop in Vermont and Bob Feller was
    there. We could get an autographed picture of him for $2.00. A guy went
    in and dominated Feller for mover an hour by plunking down $200. A
    couple years later, I saw this same guy at the big Shriners show in
    Wilmington selling these autograped pics for $10.
    
    BTW - Ninj, it's miniBrake. Bob Hunt has the (tm) on the micro prefix
    for his brood.
    
    Rich
    
29.1220AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 28 1992 14:504
    	Vaughn and Hobson patched up their differences during a midnight
    call last Saturday.  Now I can sleep nights.
    
    				/Don
29.1221PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 28 1992 15:022
    What exactly happened when Vaughn was sent down anyway?  I hear he's
    not hitting in Pawtucket these days either.
29.1222PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu May 28 1992 15:0420
    Well, here's some numbers that seem to blow away the "Roger's can't
    pitch when it counts", "Roger's too burnt out in the second half", and
    a few other of Mike C.'s "observations":
    
 Clemens' career statistics through 1991.....    

                          W -  L    IP    ER  ERA
 Before All-Star break   76 - 35  1012.0 337  3.00
  After All-Star break   58 - 26   772.1 228  2.66

                April    22 -  6   255.0  58  2.05
                May      25 - 12   339.2 122  3.23
                June     22 - 13   297.0 109  3.30
                July     21 - 12   321.2  99  2.77
                August   23 - 11   312.1 109  3.14
                Sept/Oct 21 -  8   258.2  68  2.37
                         
 W - L  ERA    G   GS CG SHO    IP   HITS  R   ER  BB  K's
134-61  2.85  241 240 78  29  1784.1 1500 628 565 490 1665
    
29.1223AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 28 1992 15:106
    	Vaugh said some things to the press BigMac after he was sent
    down.  Kind of hinted that his friendship with Jack The Whiffer/Walker
    had something to do with his demotion.  But now they've made up
    and the Red Sox can continue on their merry way towards mediocrity.
    
    				/Don
29.1224Who's your idol? The DOCTOR....JURAN::MCKAYThu May 28 1992 16:056
    Mac thanks for the stats...take that Chili!
    
    Doc I have to ask 8*)  Exactly what sport should you be idolized for,
    and how come the Cardinals keep forfeiting?
    
    Jimbo
29.1225SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu May 28 1992 16:334
    Mac, I see the numbers you posted, but how many of those late-year wins
    were BIG wins?  :*)
    
    Lee_for_Mike
29.1226"this is from your Uncle Roger" CNTROL::CHILDS&quot;I'll get briefed up on that&quot; hahahaaaThu May 28 1992 17:2313
Rat on LEe!!! He could easily be 8-1 in september when they were out of it
and 3-7 when the collar was tight in another year....How many times you going
to try and beat me over the haid with the same stats?

Here's one to get wooderize over Jimbo-0-0-fer....

 in a poll published in sports taken of major league players  50% of those
 interview said Clemens was the toughest pitcher in the Majors, 6% for Dave
 Cone, Ryan, Saberhagen and I think Morris got 3% of the vote each....

 at childs central rumor has that all players interviewed received 100 dollar
 savings bonds in their kid's name.....
29.1227Did Boggs vote for Matt Young?CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu May 28 1992 17:251
    
29.1228CNTROL::CHILDS&quot;I'll get briefed up on that&quot; hahahaaaThu May 28 1992 17:308
 Boggs vote for himself....He just a team player ML and the team needs him out
 there everyday that's why he plays third. If he pitched he'd only be able to
 help them out every 5 days. Then again this is the Almost League with the geek
 so he could DH when he doesn't pitch. Geez wonder if he's approached Hobson
 with the idea yet...

 ;^)
29.1229LUNER::BROOKSI'm too sexy for this note ...Thu May 28 1992 17:489
    Jimbo, I should be idolized as a Bad Boy with a cause.
    
    I could also be Patron Saint for Beleaguered, Physically Abused
    Quarterbacks .... :-)
    
    As fro the Cards, damned if I know. A lot of us were wondering the same
    thing Tuesday. 
    
    Well, at least we had a great pickup hoops game at MRO .... :-(
29.1230AXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Thu May 28 1992 17:538
29.1231PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jun 01 1992 19:221
    Is a game after a loss or losses considered a "Big Game"?
29.1232Seattle's a nothing team though...AXIS::ROBICHAUDMon Jun 01 1992 19:511
    
29.1233PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Mon Jun 01 1992 23:146
29.1234took 2 outta 3 from the Sox though...DECWET::METZGEROoohh, a sextet of ale...Tue Jun 02 1992 00:003

Dave Fleming for Rookie of the year... 
29.1235SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Tue Jun 02 1992 10:5417
    Mac, any game that "Big Game Hunter" watches is the definition of a
    "Big Game".
    
    Actually, I was yanking MikeC's chain a bit.  I've always felt that ANY
    game prior to the pennant being clinched is a "Big Game".  None of that
    crap about late games being more important, they are all of equal
    importance while the title is in contention.
    
    I'd hate to imagine the hoopla that would have occurred had Clemens
    spent all this time in NY.  Yankmees or Muts, it wouldn't have
    mattered, we would have been inundated with stories about him.  Good
    and bad, he would have received much more national press and media 
    exposure for any and all of his escapades.
    
    If I was an owner, I'd want him on my team, period.
    
    Lee
29.1236CUPMK::DEVLINDowntown Saturday Night in WiltonTue Jun 02 1992 12:0710
    Personally, I don't think the 'win after a loss' stat is that great.
    
    big deal.  Your ace #1 pitcher usually follows your 4th or 5th pitcher.
    The chances of pitching after a loss are greater - and since you are
    the ACE you are expected to win.   
    
    No, big games are played in October, not in the Kingdome at the end of
    May.
    
    JD
29.1237JD, is Gooden still better than Clemens?AXIS::ROBICHAUDTue Jun 02 1992 12:111
    
29.1238SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Jun 02 1992 12:212
    ...not to mention Greg Swindell!
                                          Denny
29.1239CUPMK::DEVLINDowntown Saturday Night in WiltonTue Jun 02 1992 12:3411
    Slash
    
    Clemens is better.  But he's not the greatest to ever play the game, as
    many would have you believe....
    
    Lets see if he cain carry a team to a title - you know, like Orel H.
    and frankie V. have...
    
    Does he have the guts..
    
    JD
29.1240ROYALT::ASHEYou'll dance to anything...Tue Jun 02 1992 16:431
    I think Lofton will get ALROTY before Fleming...
29.1241ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 02 1992 19:524
    
    I don't think Fleming can maintain his pace for the entire season.  I
    think Lofton can.  Lofton is definitely the favorite right now for
    ALROTY.
29.1242JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Jun 02 1992 20:0811
    re AL ROTY:
    
    Pat Listach (Milwaukee SS hitting over .300 and among the AL leaders in
    stolen bases) is right up there too.
    
    It's definitely a deeper field than last year, where Chuck Knoblauch
    almost won it by default.
    
    
    py (who picked Lofton in the BASEBALL notesfile before the season
    started)
29.1243DECWET::METZGEROoohh, a sextet of ale...Tue Jun 02 1992 20:2211
Why don't you think Fleming can keep it up for the year? He's a control pitcher,
only pitches 7 or so innings per start and has been decreasing his pitch count
in almost every outing. 

Do you think the hitters will figure him out in the 2nd half of the season or 
are you predicting fatigue?

Metz_Very happy with the M's 1st round draft choice....

 
29.1244Still could be ALROY with respectable record, thoughNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jun 02 1992 20:2818
    
> Why don't you think Fleming can keep it up for the year? He's a control pitcher,
> only pitches 7 or so innings per start and has been decreasing his pitch count
> in almost every outing. 
> 
> Do you think the hitters will figure him out in the 2nd half of the season or 
> are you predicting fatigue?
    
    I think with neither of the above occurring it's unlikely that Fleming
    can keep up the winning pace he's set to date.  I know he shut the Sox
    out the other night (no huge deal these days) and I don't know what his
    stats look like right now, but at one point he was 5-1 with an ERA up
    around 5.00.  That tells me he has had the benefit of some run support
    from a team that hasn't exactly been tearing it up offensively. 
    That'll likely even out...
    
    glenn
    
29.1245PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jun 02 1992 20:345
29.1246FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jun 02 1992 20:395
    While it was the first time the Red Sox have been shut out, it's still
    no big deal with the way they've been hitting and I'm surprised it
    didn't happen sooner.
    
    John
29.1247NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jun 02 1992 20:3914
29.1248PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jun 02 1992 20:426
    I found it interesting in light of their anemic offense.  If they
    aren't last in scoring in the AL, they are close.  They lead the league
    (if not the majors) in ERA, yet are still barely above .500.
    
    Let's hope last night's 7 run outburst is a sign of things to come (and
    the 10 runs allowed isn't).
29.1249ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 02 1992 20:577
    
    
    Fleming is a control pitcher.  He is 7-1.  At the current pace, he'd
    end up around 23-3.  I don't see it happening.  He has pitched well
    lately, but his ratio is still pretty high.
    
    
29.1250not bad for a 23 year old rookie...DECWET::METZGEROoohh, a sextet of ale...Tue Jun 02 1992 23:2216

Fleming's era of 4.xx or so as of a couple of games ago was the result of
2 bad outings. He's going to be a Mike Boddicker pitcher circa 1988 or so. 
He's going to get you into the 7th inning most times without giving up too many
runs. He's also going to get shellacked a few times s year when he just doesn't
have it.

He'll never win an Era title but he'll win a lot of games for the M's....

BTW - I, also think that the Rookie for Cleveland will win the ROY if he can 
       keep up the current pace....


Metz
  
29.1251NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 03 1992 14:278
    
    After a second look, I'd have to change my mind and go with that
    Listach kid Paul mentioned for the moment.  If you account for the 
    fewer games (and at-bats) he's played than Lofton to date, he's 
    even up there with him in SB, with a clear edge in BA, OBP, and SLG...
    
    glenn
    
29.1252MEIS::SIKESThu Jun 04 1992 13:2314
re:.1236 

>    Personally, I don't think the 'win after a loss' stat is that great.
>    
>    big deal.  Your ace #1 pitcher usually follows your 4th or 5th pitcher.
>    The chances of pitching after a loss are greater - and since you are
>    the ACE you are expected to win.   

 Right, the chances of pitching after a loss are greater because you follow 
the weakest starter in the rotation.  But since you are the ACE, the 
opposition usually has their #1 or #2 guy going against you, making winning
the game more difficult.

Bob
29.1253NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 04 1992 13:3224
    
>>    big deal.  Your ace #1 pitcher usually follows your 4th or 5th pitcher.
>>    The chances of pitching after a loss are greater - and since you are
>>    the ACE you are expected to win.   

> Right, the chances of pitching after a loss are greater because you follow 
> the weakest starter in the rotation.  But since you are the ACE, the 
> opposition usually has their #1 or #2 guy going against you, making winning
> the game more difficult.
    
    What's amazing about Clemens' record after a loss is not his number of
    wins, but his winning *percentage*.  There's no reason that Clemens'
    percentage should be any higher after a loss than a win (and it doesn't
    matter who precedes him), but it is.  As for the matchups versus
    opponents, in this day and age of set, rigid rotations Clemens'
    opposing pitcher is more or less random from game to game...
    
    With that said, I still think the stat is somewhat overrated.  Why is
    breaking a losing streak more important than keeping a winning streak
    going?  A win is a win.  I'm quite happy with Clemens' near .700 career
    winning percentage over *all* starts, thank you...
    
    glenn
    
29.1254ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Jun 04 1992 14:405
    
    At the beginning of the year, #1 starters face #1 starters.  As the
    year goes on, all teams have not played the same number of games, so
    the rotations for all teams are not lined up and #1 is no longer facing
    #1 all the time.
29.1255PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jun 08 1992 15:535
    Roger Clemens is named the pitcher of the month for May, a month in
    which he went 5-1 with an ERA under 1.  To celebrate, Roger pitched a
    sub-Clemens game (he gave up 9 hits and walked a couple) in a 5-1
    victory over Cleveland to become the first AL pitcher this season to
    record 9 victories.
29.1256Important announcement! ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jun 08 1992 16:0617
    Clemens will probably next pitch against Toronto on Thursday.  I'm
    letting Mike Childs know in advance, as even in June this one qualifies 
    as a "big game", representing a 2-game swing in the standings coming
    against the division co-leader.  By the way, Clemens has not lost a
    game in these "big" head-to-head matchups with Toronto since the middle
    of 1988, going something like 8-0 in that stretch (although he did
    pitch poorly in one of those games last season that he should have
    lost).
    
    If Clemens doesn't pitch on Thursday, it'll be because the Sox are
    bringing him back in a pinch to go on three days' rest on Wednesday
    against the other division co-leader, Baltimore.  This one also 
    qualifies as a "big game".
    
    glenn
     
29.1257CNTROL::CHILDSIf I were A....I'dMon Jun 08 1992 16:515
 Thanks Glen but your "big game" standards and mine might differ. I find it
 hard to get juiced up over a game when there's still what 100 games or so 
 left. While the Blew-J's are near the top their choke bone history is well
 established having blown the division to Detroit a few years back.....
29.1258"Never let up, never give in!" -Mikey Childs, 6/8/92 :-) SASE::SZABOA Day In The Life.Mon Jun 08 1992 17:001
    
29.1259JUNCO::GARRYboston red sox in 92Mon Jun 08 1992 18:508
    
    RE-1 Mike C
    
    Mikes attitude might also be because his favorite pitcher Frank V is 
    not doing much so far and he was supposed to be Bostons ace in 92.
    
    
    Tom
29.1260NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jun 08 1992 19:256
    
    Viola's pitched fairly well.  He's not Roger and even Hesketh has
    pitched better, but Viola's deserved better than his 5-4 record...
    
    glenn
    
29.1261PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jun 08 1992 19:463
29.1262ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Jun 09 1992 17:003
    
    Viola faced a better pitcher in Nagy.  That is why he lost.
    
29.1263RogSHARE::DERRYColor Me Impressed...Fri Jun 12 1992 10:212
    I know how many homers he gave up but how many k's did he get lasted
    night?
29.1264SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Jun 12 1992 11:105
    ROCKET BLOWS ANOTHER BIG GAME!  :*)
    
    Hiya, Mikey!
    
    lEe
29.1265SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Jun 12 1992 12:063
       I think he struck out 7. He's given up FIVE HOMERS this season.
    Whataya think Mike? Time to waive him!!?
                                  Denny
29.1266Playing the role of Devil's advocateHYDRA::HAUSRATHCarson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff'Fri Jun 12 1992 12:217
    
    Two straight non-"Roger" type games.. remember he gave up a lot of 
    hits against the Tribe on Saturday.   Could it be time for the
    annual-mid-season-swoon-brought-on-by-mysterious-unnannounced-injury?
    
    /Jeff
    
29.1267good Sox seats pleaseSTRATA::FELDMANpatriots in 92Fri Jun 12 1992 12:2817
	Doug Feldman
	strata::feldman
	225:5224
	


	I've watched allot of Red Sox games on TV and I've attend several
	games but I never seem to get really good seats. I've always
	wanted to sit behind the plate or around the Sox's dug out. I'm
	looking to purchase 2 tickets in one of those 2 areas. so if
	you have a couple of tickets you'd like to sell please reply by
	mail with the location of the seats and  the price and the date
	of the game.

		thanks

		Doug
29.1268CNTROL::CHILDSIt wasn't a big game anywaysFri Jun 12 1992 13:114
 Anyone know if the Yankees won last night?

  ;^)
29.1269I'll admit it, Clemens pitched poorly in a big game...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 12 1992 14:1818
    
    > Two straight non-"Roger" type games.. remember he gave up a lot of 
    > hits against the Tribe on Saturday.   Could it be time for the
    > annual-mid-season-swoon-brought-on-by-mysterious-unnannounced-injury?
    
    Ah yes, one of those "swoons" where Roger's ERA rises to 2.80 over a
    stretch instead of 1.80.  I was at the Indians' game.  They had one big
    hit and a bunch of harmless singles.  Unlike what the Blue Jays did
    last night, that's not a good formula for beating Clemens.  I'm worried
    about the Red Sox, but not Roger...
    
    Well, Mike C. might not think so, but I still say that last night's game
    was a very big one.  Neither Clemens nor the bats came through. 
    They're in a hole to two teams now that I don't believe they can escape
    from even if they do play as well as one can expect the rest of the way...
    
    glenn
    
29.1270FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Jun 12 1992 14:193
    Sox will be no better than 82-80 this year.
    
    John
29.1271Six, two, and even. PeriodCTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Fri Jun 12 1992 14:201
    
29.1272His ERA can't be 2.8HYDRA::HAUSRATHCarson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff'Fri Jun 12 1992 14:5615
    
    
    RE: .1269
    
    glenn, I was joking about the swoon, but maybe I'm not too far off... 
    
    Clemens usually dominates Cleveland, so I consider giving up 9 hits to 
    be a poor performance for him...  besides, a few clutch Cleveland hits
    in that game and he takes an early shower.  The media said that game was a 
    non-Clemens type performance, and I think last nights effort falls into
    the same catagory. 
    
    Time to start the Nagy/Clemens rivalry note?  
    
    /Jeff 
29.1273PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 12 1992 14:5918
29.1274CNTROL::CHILDSIt wasn't a big game anywaysFri Jun 12 1992 15:0510
>   To Clemens credit, he got tougher and nastier with men on base.  Many
>  would say this is an indication of his prowess as a pitcher (right,
>   Mike?).
    
  no Mike would say it's a case of getting some extra help from the umps...
  You know the old double wide, double high strike zone he's famous for...

  but Mike's not here today...

  ;^)
29.1275NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 12 1992 15:1925
    
    > Clemens usually dominates Cleveland, so I consider giving up 9 hits to 
    > be a poor performance for him...
    
    I agree with you; the key words being "for him".  That kind of outing,
    unlike last night's, is still good enough for a win, though.  Believe
    it or not Roger Clemens has never been at the very top of the league in
    opponents' batting average.  He'll give up some hits, but his control 
    and ability to avoid the big extra-base hits usually carry him (again, 
    last night he had neither).
    
    Clemens' ERA is still at 1.79.  The 2.80 comment was in reference to 
    last year's run where he was indeed criticized for posting something 
    like a 3.30 ERA (well below average) over a ten-game stretch 
    conveniently located between the endpoints of his two bad starts on 
    the season (Texas and Toronto).  Those kind of statistical games can 
    be played with anyone; bottom line result was still a league-leading 
    ERA on the season.
    
    You can joke about mysterious arm troubles, but once again Clemens was
    stupidly allowed to throw 131 pitches on a bad night in a lost cause.
    No way any other manager in baseball allows his bread-and-butter go out
    for the eighth inning like that...
    
    glenn  
29.12761.86 sounds betterHYDRA::HAUSRATHCarson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff'Fri Jun 12 1992 17:306
    
    Glenn, you can't put all the BLAM on the manager for Roger's inning 
    totals..  many time he'll want to continue pitching, or pitch through
    injuries without telling the manager.  
    
    /Jeff
29.1277ROYALT::ASHELaugh while you can, Monkey-boy...Fri Jun 12 1992 18:021
    Roger shouldn't be running the show...
29.1278You ask your players to give 100%, but don't abuse it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 12 1992 18:2413
    
    > Roger shouldn't be running the show...
    
    No, he shouldn't be, but if he is in this case it's not his fault.  If
    he's not hurt, and I don't think he is right now, he shouldn't have to
    ask out of the game.  It's the manager's job to exercise a little bit
    of common sense in the use of his pitching resources.  It shouldn't
    even matter if Clemens feels good or not at the moment; given his 
    history at the end of seasons where he's pitched league-leading innings
    totals, you err on the side of caution in a game that's a lost cause...
    
    glenn
     
29.1279CNTROL::CHILDSIt wasn't a big game anywaysFri Jun 12 1992 19:124
 yeah Glen that's true but where talking about a certified "head case"  here.
 pull Clemens when he doesn't want to be and he'll be asking for a trade in
 the morning.....
29.1280I thought you said you gave up alcohol ;^)PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 12 1992 19:191
    Where do you come up with this stuff, Mike.
29.1281Mikey, that's what makes Roger a bad guy. Doncha love it?!SASE::SZABOA Day In The Life.Fri Jun 12 1992 19:251
    
29.1282he's looney toons for sure!!CNTROL::CHILDSIt wasn't a big game anywaysFri Jun 12 1992 19:3311
 of course I do Hawk...  ;^) Wade's boring but Roger's a thrill a minute...
 Mac, you telling me that in the heat of the pennant race that a stable minded
 idividual of Roger's talents would be punching out doors in the manager's 
 office?

 Speakin of ole Wade last time I looked he was batting down near the mendosa
 line then I hear he's hit a couple of homers the last few games, I have to
 wonder is Margo back in town???

 mike
29.1283I love the guy; I really do...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 12 1992 19:5221
                  
 > yeah Glen that's true but where talking about a certified "head case"  here.
 > pull Clemens when he doesn't want to be and he'll be asking for a trade in
 > the morning.....
    
    You may be on to something, Mike, but that's what that 5-year contract
    was for.  You've got three years left to smooth things over...
    
    Speaking of Roger's headstrong tendencies, any of you guys seen that
    Reebok commercial on ESPN (I've asked others, but no one seems to have
    seen it)?  Roger's going through his insane workout paces, each routine 
    of which they ask what he's doing, to which he explains and then 
    angrily demands: "You got a problem with that?!"  Crazy stuff like 
    punching his fist into a big bag of rice to strengthen his forearm 
    muscles...  At the end he finally whiffs some pathetic excuse for an 
    actor trying to resemble a hitter and barks again, "You got a problem 
    with *that?*! Good!"  Much better than the in-your-face commercials;
    all it lacks is Terry Cooney...
    
    glenn
    
29.1284PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 12 1992 20:1117
29.1285FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Jun 12 1992 20:3118
    OK, Mike Childs, I'm going to ask you a serious question:  What more do
    you want from Roger Clemens?  He is single-handedly keeping the Sox
    alive this season.  He is doing it without much run support and without
    a great bullpen.  He is doing it knowing he almost has to pitch a
    shutout everytime out.  He hasn't complained or bad-mouthed anybody all
    season that I know of.  He hasn't said anything stupid to the press.
    
    You can't use the fact that he's not pitching when it really matters
    because the Sox aren't going to play any games that really matter in
    1992.  They'll finish no better than 82-80 and probably won't even do
    that well.
    
    The last person to have lived up to the standards you seem to have for
    Clemens was put on a cross and crucified on Good Friday in AD 33.  I'd
    really like to know what it would take for him to satisfy you and
    whether you'd be happier with him traded or sold somewhere else.
    
    John
29.1286Goeorge's cousin?SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Jun 12 1992 20:363
       Mike doesn't like Roger 'cause he's from Texas and probably a
    Republican!
                                Denny 8^)
29.1287NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 12 1992 20:378
    
    John, I think Mike C. has with maybe some slight serious reservations 
    here and there made it clear that he's a chain-yanker par excellence 
    when it comes to Clemens.  At least I know I'm only having fun with 
    it...
    
    glenn
    
29.1288CELTIK::JACOBLosing it from all the right placesFri Jun 12 1992 20:3713
    
    >>The last person to have lived up to the standards you seem to have for
    >>Clemens was put on a cross and crucified on Good Friday in AD 33.  I'd
    
    
    Hey Ninj,
    
    Those are some pretty strong words, there.  Love it, though.  Sorta
    gets you're point across!
    
    JaKe
    
    
29.1289ACESMK::FRANCUSPittsburgh Penguins, 1992 Stanley Cup ChampionsFri Jun 12 1992 20:389
    re: .1285
       
>    The last person to have lived up to the standards you seem to have for
>    Clemens was put on a cross and crucified on Good Friday in AD 33. 
    
    That is debatable. Now back to the Red Sox.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.12904th Cy Young coming in 92......JUNCO::GARRYboston red sox in 92Fri Jun 12 1992 20:4213
    re -1
    
    Good question John,I myself would like to hear Mike C say what it
    takes from the Rocket to satisfy him........The guy has done everything
    any major league pitcher can do,you can't blame him for not winning
    a world series because it takes 9 guys to do that,if you could win a
    world series one on one Clemens would probably have won 5 by now.
    The guy is paid very well to pitch and he is the best there is in
    baseball.Mike if he pitched for the A's in 88,89,90 I guarantee he
    would've won 30 games each year because they were a complete team and
    had it all,hitting,fielding and the best closer in baseball right now.
    
    Tom
29.1291Childs comes clean film at 11:00CNTROL::CHILDSIt wasn't a big game anywaysFri Jun 12 1992 21:3621
 Roger pleases me all the time I don't know what you guys are talking about.
 He's always doing something out of the norm and has a rebel spirit which is 
 high on my list.  Like JD and a countless other noters had problem with the 
 Bird Jihad, I have problems with the Roger Jihad. Before this year there were 
 guys who you could truthfully say pitched better than him. Now you really 
 can't. I'd still like to see him win a world series game though before I can 
 truly consider him to be the greatest ever. Even still power pitchers will
 never rate high with me. I got a rag-arm so I like pitchers who throw junk.

 As Glen so eloquently put it, I'm just a chain-yanker here because you
 folks have gotten so bent out of shape over the years cause I refused to
 kiss the guys feet. I wasn't even going to mention today's game but lo
 and behold the first five messages in here where written to me so I had
 to respond.

 Mac a bat swung by Clark is a hell of a reach in comparision to Roger almost
 damaging his hand in the middle of a race over a petty squabble with Morgan.
 So Wade's average is coming up? Margo or Margo II must be in town....

 mike
29.1292FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Jun 15 1992 12:188
    First, I apologize for throwing in the comparison to Jesus Christ. 
    While it made my point, it was uncalled for.
    
    Second, Roger will never win a World Series game with the surrounding
    cast he has.  At the rate they're going, they won't win a divisional
    title for the nexted few years.
    
    John
29.1293Roger might not get another chanceSALES::THILLMon Jun 15 1992 14:099
    Walter Johnson, who you could make a pretty good argument as the best
    ever, only won one WS game. That was only because they brought him in
    late in the game as a relief pitcher, which especially in those days, was 
    very rare.
    
    Whether a pitcher even has the chance to win a WS game says more about
    his team than the pitcher himself...
    
    Tom
29.1294PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jun 15 1992 15:015
    Jeff Reardon tied Rollie Fingers all-time save mark with his
    performance on Saturday against the Jays.
    
    I think Lou Gorman should either try to get Joe Carter or pay some
    National League team to make a trade for him.  
29.1295JURAN::MCKAYMon Jun 15 1992 16:375
    Mikey,
    	a rag arm?  I thought you had a cannon!!!  Those guys all
    had world class speed on the bases.......8*)
    
    Jimbo
29.1296CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Mon Jun 15 1992 18:205
    Rag arm? Never heard that. We woulda called ya puss arm, Mikey!
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
29.1297LUNER::BROOKSDon't go gently into that good night ...Mon Jun 15 1992 20:135
    re .1293
    
    Actually, Johnson won 1 game in the 1924 series (in relief) after
    losing the first two. He then won Games 1 and Four in 1925, but lost
    Game 7 ....
29.1298PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jun 16 1992 14:532
    Jeff Reardon broke Rollie Fingers' career save mark by notching #342
    against the Yankees last night to preserve a 1-0 BoSox win.
29.1299SASE::SZABOA Day In The Life.Tue Jun 16 1992 14:597
    It was a great moment too.  
    
    And, when he took his cap off, he was the spittin' image of the Snide!
    
    Hawk
    
    
29.1300ROYALT::ASHEThey beat up Hulk, he might not make itTue Jun 16 1992 15:272
    And they lifted him on their shoulders to kiss his wife... oh sorry
    Mac, didn't want to get mushy again...
29.1301AXIS::ROBICHAUDTue Jun 16 1992 16:254
    	...and Clemens stupidly doused him with Gatorade causing Reardon
    to come down with pneumonia!
    
    				/Don
29.1302This one's for DanDCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKETue Jun 16 1992 16:596
    You know, Reardon probably never would have broken Fingers' record had
    it not been for the park effect created by the new, improved Fenway
    Park. ;-}
    
    Rich
    
29.1303GIAMEM::LEFEBVREHow does Dan Quayle spell relief?Tue Jun 16 1992 17:052
    
    
29.1304USCTR1::NAHEARNTue Jun 16 1992 17:158
    This just in...........
    
    Jeff Reardon does NOT have pneumonia!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
29.13057389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeTue Jun 16 1992 17:199
    Danny boy spells it with an "E"
    
    
    like in podatoe
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
29.1306Rog, you're the best, man...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jun 16 1992 17:207
    Still was nice seeing a me-first, non-team-player like Roger Clemens 
    willing to risk that precious right shoulder to put a teammate in the
    spotlight, wasn't it?  ;-)
    
    glenn
     
29.1307CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Morrou for PresidentTue Jun 16 1992 17:372
Glen, I think you got Rog and Boggs confused...
29.1308park effects fer shureLUNER::BROOKSDon't go gently into that good night ...Tue Jun 16 1992 18:393
    re .1302
    
    You took the words away from me Rich ! Haa !
29.1309MCIS2::DHAMELCelebrate with loot and lyreWed Jun 17 1992 13:1813
    
    Jeff Rearend, coming off a glorious performance the night before,
    failed miserably in saving a well-deserved win for Roger lasted night.
    Coming in in the ninth with a 2-1 lead, he promptly surrendered the
    go-ahead runs as the Damn Yankees went up 3-2.  Plantier homered in
    the bottom of the ninth for the tie, and the Sox won it in the 10th.
    Now, if the Sox had scored two in the bottom of the ninth, Roger's
    gutty performance would have been a no-decision and Rearend's miserable
    show would have given him a win, n'est pas?
    
    Dickstah
    
    
29.1310FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jun 17 1992 13:2414
    That's exactly right, Dickstah.  Bob Stanley was famous for blowing
    saves in the 9th inning and having the Sox win in the bottom of the
    9th, which is why he was known as the Vulture.
    
    Games like last night had an important role in the invention and
    evolution of the save rule as well.  In 1959, Roy Face had a 18-1
    record as a relief pitcher for the Pirates.  Jerome Holtzman, noted
    Chicago sportswriter, did some research on Face and found that in most
    cases he was coming in, blowing leads and then getting the win when the
    Pirates came back to win.  Holtzman felt Face really wasn't being very
    effective and a more accurate measure of a pitcher's effectiveness was
    needed, hence, the save.
    
    John
29.1311Maybe Clemens wanted to toss him into the crowd the other nightNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 17 1992 13:3624
    > Games like last night had an important role in the invention and
    > evolution of the save rule as well.  In 1959, Roy Face had a 18-1
    > record as a relief pitcher for the Pirates.  Jerome Holtzman, noted
    > Chicago sportswriter, did some research on Face and found that in most
    > cases he was coming in, blowing leads and then getting the win when the
    > Pirates came back to win.  Holtzman felt Face really wasn't being very
    > effective and a more accurate measure of a pitcher's effectiveness was
    > needed, hence, the save.
    
    But at least Face was blowing those leads over 3-4 inning outings, not
    these 2-3 batter jobs.  His overall pitching record (ERA, etc.) was 
    actually quite good and he was effective that season, bogus save rules 
    notwithstanding...
    
    Jeff Rearend?  Ouch.  The simple fact of it is that Reardon blew the 
    game because I was there last night.  I swear, I've seen half the guy's
    blown saves while with Boston in person, and probably half of those
    with a Clemens' win on the line.  I think I saw a graphic on ESPN this
    morning that showed that 4 of Reardon's last 6 blown saves over the
    past two years have come at Clemens' expense.
    
    glenn
    
29.1312PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 17 1992 13:417
29.1313Mac, a convert? ;^) I like his style...CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentWed Jun 17 1992 14:410
29.1314MCIS2::DHAMELCelebrate with loot and lyreWed Jun 17 1992 14:548
    
    It's a shame that Roger doesn't have the win/loss record to match
    the rest of his stats, and this game is an example why---blown saves
    and lack of run support.  Sure Roger can have a bad day and come away
    with a 9-7 win, but it ain't happened yet this year.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1315Way to hustle WadeCTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed Jun 17 1992 15:3810
    Hey Glenn,
    Since you was there. What didya think of Boggs no-hustle in the third.
    He dogged it to second on the Clark DP. Sheeit if he hustled a bit
    and slid he woulda beat the throw easily. And the replay was 
    convincingly damning. As he sheepishly ran to the dugout faster than
    he did to second. Hobson shoulda leather-lunged him. And Monty
    trying to rationalize his "gaffe". 
    
    MikeL
    
29.1316NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 17 1992 15:5411
    
    > Since you was there. What didya think of Boggs no-hustle in the third.
    
    An absolute disgrace, an insult to the national pastime...
    
    Boggs might have been forced at second even with the hit-and-run on; I
    don't know, but at the very least Gallego should have been buried
    somewhere out in short left field...
    
    glenn
    
29.1317I really DID think this at the time...SALES::THILLWed Jun 17 1992 16:208
    Why is it a LAW that the closer MUST pitch the 9th? I know it sounds
    like second-guessing, but Harris pitched the 8th and was effective, so
    why not keep him out there and give Rearend a rest? 
    
    Also, why didn't Hobson pinch-hit (Bruno?) for Pena in the 9th with 
    Burks on 2nd and 1 out?
    
    Tom
29.1318AXIS::ROBICHAUDP-O-T-A-T-O-E ?Wed Jun 17 1992 16:3612
	Tom, that stuff about the closer is in the rule book.

	Page 666

	Paragraph A

	Subparagraph 3

	Section 1.6.9

	"A closer must pitch the 9th inning of a one run game or forfeit 
	 the title of said closer..."
29.1319Pena's better than Flaherty, but c'mon, play to win...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 17 1992 17:099
    
    > Also, why didn't Hobson pinch-hit (Bruno?) for Pena in the 9th with 
    > Burks on 2nd and 1 out?
    
    Skeered to use his backup catcher in these kind of close late-game 
    situations if the pinch-hitter doesn't come through (I'm serious).
    
    glenn
    
29.1320On the roster all year, played only the last gameSALES::THILLWed Jun 17 1992 17:164
    If Flahrety is that bad, he shouldn't be on the roster, especailly
    considering Pena's age. Flahrety is clearly the backup, but c'mon, he
    could give them a couple of decent innings. It's not as if he's Roger
    LaFrancios....  
29.1321MCIS2::DHAMELCelebrate with loot and lyreWed Jun 17 1992 20:1114
    
    And how 'bout Pena allowing the runner on second to tag up and go to
    third on a pop-foul behind the plate?
    
    And how 'bout Greenwell (before he threw a guy out from the corner)
    chasing a ball into the corner and, conceding the double, casually
    picked up the ball without even glancing around at the runner?  The
    runner *could* have fallen down, or he *could* have stupidly tried
    for third, but Greenie must have seen the ball land, said "Well, that's
    a double".  End of play.  Maybe he did get yelled at and that's why he
    hustled on the next one.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1322PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 17 1992 20:329
29.1323A win is a winHYDRA::HAUSRATHCarson on BB: Awesome 'Stuff'Thu Jun 18 1992 11:567
    
    All this complaining amidst a 3 game winning streak and 
    a potential sweep of the dreaded Yankees.   You guys are too hard on 
    these guys..  ;-)
    
    /Jeff
    
29.1324Pennant fever grips Hub!!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jun 18 1992 12:192
    
    
29.1325JURAN::MCKAYThu Jun 18 1992 15:405
    back a few
    	How about "A closer must pitch the 9th or forfeit his millions
    to the set up reliever"
    
    Jimbo
29.1326SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu Jun 18 1992 16:206
    /Jeff, I think it's more like "hated" Yankees, rather than "dreaded".
    
    'Sides, Sox fans haveta have something to complain about.  Usually,
    that's not a problem, tho.  :*)
    
    lEe
29.1327AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Jun 18 1992 16:415
    	Did Hobson tell Harris and Clark to go to their rooms without
    supper after last night's game?
    
    
    				/Don
29.1328Some good newsSHARE::DERRYSo What'cha want?Thu Jun 25 1992 11:121
    at least they aren't gonna lose today....
29.1329JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jun 25 1992 14:077
    re 58.95:
    
    NESN SportsDesk this morning reported that Burks suffered severe back
    spasms, but nothing more.  They said he's day-to-day.
    
    
    py
29.1330Cain't git blood from a stone.CTHQ3::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu Jun 25 1992 15:0620
    GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GO... and counting.
    
    As Steve Tyler says " Going Dowwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnn?!"
    
    Which Milwaukee pitchers are salivating at the thought of their ERA
    dipping lower towards the Mendoza line ? As the Bosox avg. gits nearer.
    
    Sad state of affairs for this lifelong Sox fanatic. All three
    outfielders injured, PawSox already up, the pitchers must really
    be enjoying this season. Wheww. Poor Hobson looks lost, what can he do.
    Funny how both Boston papers are running features on Joe Morgan. Joe
    must be grinning like the proverbial Cheshire cat. Well both Morgan
    and Richie Hebner just about predicted as such preaseason. And Hobson
    can't do a dang thing about it.
    
    When do the Patriots begin?
    
    Sadly,
    MikeL
    
29.1331Thank God for WTBS and National League baseball!AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateThu Jun 25 1992 15:501
    
29.1333Will the Gerbil be placed on the DL?AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateThu Jun 25 1992 15:511
    
29.13349.5 GONGS and rising...JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jun 25 1992 15:5350
    re .1331:
    
    Amen Slasher!
    
    re .1330 (MikeL):
    
    I agree 100%, Butch Hobson is the least of this team's problems
    (and Dan Shaughnessy's suggestion that the return of Joe Morgan would
    magically make all this team's problems go away is full of it, even by
    Shaughnessy's standards).
                                                 
    I think a big turning point downward for this franchise was the
    off-season between the 1990 and 1991 seasons.

    As a panic reaction to Mike Boddicker being signed by KC, the Sox went
    nutzoid and gave megabuck free agent contracts to Jack Clark (whom no
    one else except the Phillies had a passing interest in), Matt Young
    (WHY?!?!?),  Danny Darwin (whom they mistakenly assumed had the
    durability to be a full-fledged rotation starter), and extended the
    contracts of some other so-so players (Brunansky for one).

    No plan, just a reaction with little if any thought.

    The end result is a roster with a significant percentage of so-so
    players who are untradeable because they come with hefty price tags
    (see also Kansas City Royals, California Angels).  

    For this reason, the "trade to shake things up" that Sox fans are
    clamoring for ain't gonna happen.  What's there on the Boston roster
    for tradeable commodities, beyond maybe a 3-4 starter?  A Jody Reed
    that everyone knows is eligible for free agency at the end of next
    year?  One of a cast of thousands of fair-to-decent average, no power,
    mediocre defense 1B/OF/DH types?  Only in the dreams of "geniuses" like
    Eddie Anvilhaid who open their shows with "I'm So Excited" one day and
    "Abandon Ship" the next.

    And the strong free agent pool (Bonds/Sierra/Puckett/Ripken/Swindell/
    Drabek among others) that'll be out there after this season?  Thanks to
    funds committed to a bunch of deadwood, the Sox' ability to pursue
    these players will be severely limited (if not out of the question
    altogether).

    Top all this off with a Pawtucket club cluttered with the likes of has
    beens and never wases like Tommy Barrett, Luis Aguayo, John Shelby, Bob
    Geren. etc., etc., etc., and the bottom line becomes all too clear.  

    It's going to get a lot worse for the Red Sox before it gets better...


    py
29.1335ROYALT::ASHEDon't leave me hangin, I wanna be ganginThu Jun 25 1992 16:295
    Tsk tsk tsk... youze guyz sound like you're out of it or something.
    The Tigers are only a Go (half gong) behind you guys.  We have the
    pitching to go all the way.  Don't you think a rotation that includes
    Tanana, Terrell and Leiter strikes fear in the AL?
    
29.1336AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateThu Jun 25 1992 16:335
    	Hey Walt, that trio of Cy Young candidates will not get to pitch
    against the Fortune Sub/.500 team all the time.  Heck, if DoorMatt
    Young got to picth against the Slobs he would finally win a game.
    
    				/Don
29.1337ArnoldEarlyJackLamabeIkeDelockMattYoungDannyDarwinCTHQ3::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu Jun 25 1992 16:4525
    I hear ya PY,
    Agreed. I hear Louigi is lookin at Gary Pettis? Why, jest bring up
    Shelby. And why ain't Cerutti up. Plenty of seats will be available in
    August and September, and people will scoop em up because of the
    park. Hope the Sox don't misinterpretate (thanks Clem) that.
    We cain probably sit behind da dugout fer right field seat prices
    when Tigermania rolls ( yea I mean you Cecil!) around. 
    
    One thing about Morgan I gots to relate. Now Joe has remained pretty
    tightlipped about the whole situation, but I heard him on Eddie
    Andelman's show the other day. Eddie was ranting about the 600 Club
    effect and asked him what he thought. Joe paused for a sec and said
    and I paraphrase " I was talking to Greenwell last year and he told
    me that when he hit the ball to left field it died and sliced towards
    the stands so it had to be the 600 club. I told Greenwell that the
    reason they all died wuz because he couldn't hit the damn ball hard
    enough!" I was rolling. No wonder the veterans didn't like him.
    
    One thing I do enjoy about Anvilhaid is the "GONGS" as he opens the
    show. He said yesterday that it was his mission in life to be an
    ingrown hair on Lou's ass. And I quote.
    
    MikeL
    
    
29.1338"If Eddie Andlemnan knows baseball..I'll wrassle cowsCTHQ3::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu Jun 25 1992 16:494
    HAHAHA Slash.
    DL for ZiM?? Discombubulated Lemming?
    
    
29.1339Sox threw a lot of money away, but it clears up soon...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 25 1992 17:0438
    > And the strong free agent pool (Bonds/Sierra/Puckett/Ripken/Swindell/
    > Drabek among others) that'll be out there after this season?  Thanks to
    > funds committed to a bunch of deadwood, the Sox' ability to pursue
    > these players will be severely limited (if not out of the question
    > altogether).
    
    Maybe, maybe not.  Peter Gammons wrote recently that Lou Gorman made
    the comment that he should be able to free up $8-10 million from his
    payroll this winter.  The question is whether they'll be willing to do
    something with it or just cut their current free agent losses and 
    pocket it.  If the writing on the wall regarding the upcoming national 
    TV contracts (affecting small market teams more than large market ones) 
    finally becomes clear before this off-season's free agent season, the 
    glut of top-notch free agents might force a reduction in what some of 
    the players are asking for.
    
    I don't know if they'll do anything (probably not), but I like the Red
    Sox' current salary structure more than that of some other large market
    teams like the Mets, Cubs, and Dodgers who also aren't getting their
    money's worth but have made some larger, more recent signings.  By the 
    end of the 1993 season, the hefty contracts of Boggs, Pena, Greenwell, 
    Young, Clark, Brunansky, Burks, and Reardon will all be gone (Boggs, 
    Pena, Reardon, and Bruno after this season).  Only Roger Clemens and 
    Frank Viola are signed on into the mid-1990s, and I have absolutely no 
    problems with that. 
    
    I can see the acquisition of either Bonds or Sierra as a prudent
    investment, more so than the recent signings of Strawberry, Bonilla,
    Sandberg, etc.  For the bucks they're asking, I'd stay away from the
    rest, the guys over 30 (both Ripken and Puckett turn 32 this season and
    will be 33 in the first year of their deals-- that's a definite risk to
    any five-year deal).  I'd like to see the Red Sox thinking that way if 
    it's at all possible, and not just throwing up their hands claiming
    that they (stupidly) tried free agency but it just doesn't work.
    
    glenn         
     
29.1340CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Jun 25 1992 17:1410
Hey who cares??   Maybe Roger will win another Cy Young.   That will make
the Sox fans so happy they'll buy another 2 million tickets.  Rather win
a Cy Young then a WOrld Series.

JD

PS:  Glenn - why do folks think the Bonilla signing is so bad?  He's on his
way to another 100 ribby season - which is all I, as a Mets fan, wanted or
expected.  If HoJo could start hitting, it would help.  Bonilla, IMO, has
been doing fine.
29.1341I don't think he's in the top 15 players in baseball...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 25 1992 17:2015
       
> PS:  Glenn - why do folks think the Bonilla signing is so bad?  He's on his
> way to another 100 ribby season - which is all I, as a Mets fan, wanted or
> expected.  If HoJo could start hitting, it would help.  Bonilla, IMO, has
> been doing fine.
    
    It's not a bad signing; I just don't think Bonilla's in that top tier
    of players with Bonds, Sierra, Griffey, etc.  The unanswered questions
    are what's he going to be worth in 5 years and what will salaries look
    like in general at that time?  If the Mets don't win with him *now*, 
    with the uncertain baseball financial climate it could turn out to be 
    an expensive mistake...
    
    glenn
     
29.1342The opposite is much closer to the truth...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 25 1992 17:2514
> Hey who cares??   Maybe Roger will win another Cy Young.   That will make
> the Sox fans so happy they'll buy another 2 million tickets.  Rather win
> a Cy Young then a WOrld Series.
    
    Just keep repeating something long enough and eventually even *you*
    believe it, eh JD?  Have you been back to Fenway Park recently?  It's
    not exactly the most pleasant of atmospheres.
    
    Pretty humorous that you made this ridiculous comment in the same reply 
    that you state that "a 100 rbi season" is all you want from Bonilla...
    
    glenn
    
29.1343CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Jun 25 1992 17:3011
Glenn -

Hey, lighten up!  Geez.  But after reading the latest group of "IS Roger
the Greatest" in the love-fest note, you gotta see where I get it ;-)

But I'll make ya a bet.  Despite the 'ugliness' at Fenway - I bet that next
year, they line up like lambs, and we'll hear a lot of Roger praising.

Admit it Glenn - you are simply using the 'repeat...' line as a cop-out.

JD
29.1344He ain't the problemCTHQ3::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu Jun 25 1992 17:368
    One thing JD,
    They'll show up like lambs but won't be as meek. Vocal and mean
    maybe, but not meek.
    
    BTW what's wrong with Roger praising. The man's a thoroughbread (sp)
    and you know it. You'd love him near LaGuardia.
    
    
29.1345CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Jun 25 1992 17:5210
Mike -

Praising was too timid a word.  He's great.  End of discussion.  But, as 
youshould know by now, I don't go into diety raising - and way too many
folks have moved Roger to God-dom.   Especially the "Greatest of All  Time"
crap.  

I'd take Bob Gibson, among others, in a heartbeat.

JD
29.1346RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKEThu Jun 25 1992 17:5324
    I'm half with you half agin' you, JD, on this.
    
    In one way, it would be great iffin the fans said, "enough is enough"
    and stopped going to the games. But, hey, I love baseball, I attend
    nearly 35 minor league games here in Richmond and if I have a MAJOR
    league team in town, I'm gonna go see them
    
    What I would REALLY like to see is all those/you folks who have NESN,
    cancel the darn thing. Let Sox management know that you'll go to see
    the Sox in person but in no way will you PAY to have them come into
    your den/living room.
    
    I think that would send a message that they couldn't weasel out of. If
    thew fans stop coming, ala Detroit, they could start to threaten a
    move. However, if the 2,000,000 keep coming, they couldn't get league
    approval.
    
    One other thing...when Baltimore had that horrid season a few years
    back, they brought in close to 2M in attendence. We all said, "Wow,
    what die hard baseball fans". If the Sox stink and they bring in 2M
    fans, we are a bunch of "blinded by Roger's Light" fools.
    
    Rich
    
29.1347CTHQ3::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu Jun 25 1992 18:2413
    Rat on Rich,
    
    JD, I know that. As far as Roger in the elite, yea well maybe. He's
    got a way to go and if he can maintain his consistency he very well
    could be considered in the top 5 by the time he hangs 'em up. But he's
    got some unfinished bidness in the postseason to giddyap after. And
    I hope he can get the opportunity at least one more time in the not
    so distant future. And I mean with the RedSox!
    
    MikeL
    How'd you know ah like Gibson before all the others also??
    Wif Seaver and Carlton not too far behind.
    
29.1348SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jun 25 1992 18:302
       I still like Koufax, and a course Greg Swindell!
                                      Denny
29.1349CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Jun 25 1992 18:356
Rich -

At least the Orioles have won  a championship that folks can remember - in the 
modern era.  

JD
29.1350Clemens *is* a *baseball* deity; catch it now! ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 25 1992 18:3730
    
    I don't subscribe to NESN; I steal it.  Is taking as opposed to
    giving to Red Sox TV coffers okay?  (Just kidding about stealing NESN;
    actually it just sort of comes in on my cable system with a distorted
    but watchable signal-- kind of like the Red Sox in the flesh).
    
    I'd go to the ballpark 25 times a year if the Red Sox were losing 100
    games a season.  I'm no frontrunner.  I don't consider myself a sheep;
    I wouldn't be going to heap praise on the hometown boys, but I don't 
    think I'd have to apologize to anyone for going to the ballpark and 
    enjoying myself just the same.  I've yet to see any evidence that 
    "sending a message" to MLB ownership has any positive effect on 
    operations.  If anything, it has a negative effect.  The Red Sox 
    were just as lethargic in the periods of their history when their 
    fans were relatively the same.  About which MLB teams do people 
    currently claim that things are looking up because the fans are 
    staying away in droves?
    
    What's wrong with appreciation for Roger Clemens?  What fans in any
    baseball city don't behave in the same manner towards their stars?  Why
    shouldn't I prefer going to the park to see Roger Clemens pitch instead
    of Mike Gardiner?
    
    Bob Gibson?  Hell yeah, I'd be out at the park to see him pitch every
    chance I could get.  Would Gibson have been any less great of a pitcher
    toiling for a team like the Red Sox?  In this alternate universe would
    we be standing accused of being Gibson-worshippers?
    
    glenn
    
29.1351SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jun 25 1992 18:416
       I don't go along with this 'sheep' crap either. I've missed 7
    Patriot home games since 1975, and it's not because I thought the Pats
    were doing a swell job. I just like football! I'm sure lots a the
    people at Fenway feel the same way. Now only if we could get 500,000
    more suckers to go to Foxboro, they might hang around.
                                   Denny
29.1352ROYALT::ASHEDon't leave me hangin, I wanna be ganginThu Jun 25 1992 18:426
    >Heck, if DoorMatt
    >Young got to picth against the Slobs he would finally win a game.
    
    I don't know, he did groove a nice one to Cecil on that granny the
    other night.
    
29.1353An observation I've had for years...SASE::SZABOA Day In The Life.Thu Jun 25 1992 18:575
    JD, you are certainly the grandmaster "tweeker" of ::sports, and love
    every tweeking minute of it, that's for sure!
    
    Hawk
    
29.1354Damn right I'm sensitive! ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 25 1992 19:5910
    > JD, you are certainly the grandmaster "tweeker" of ::sports, and love
    > every tweeking minute of it, that's for sure!
    
    We're wearing him down, though, Hawk.  He's no longer demanding a trade
    of Clemens as after that Cooney incident in the playoffs, and today he
    even used that "g"-string word in connection with Roger... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.1355FDCV07::KINGFri Jun 26 1992 02:165
    Ahh JD... If Gibson of 1966-1970 were to pitch today he would NOT win
    15 games..... He would be thrown out and Suspended for throwing at
    batters... Different era, different rules...
    
    REK
29.1356SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Jun 26 1992 10:5643
    Not being a Sox fan, I can comment on something that's been bugging me.
    
    How come Sox fans are sheep for going to Fenway?  Is there another MLB
    game in town that I haven't heard about?  Some fans like the game,
    other people like the atmosphere.  What's wrong with that?
    
    If they only go when the team is winning, they are front-runners.
    
    Fans of other teams are called "loyal" when they go to watch a team
    that loses more than it wins.
    
    Which fans are better today, Sox or Tiger fans?  The Tigers are dying
    at the gate.  Is that having a positive impact on the team?  As a Tiger
    fan, I can tell you "NO".  If anything, it's a negative impact.  The
    Tigers have a heavy payroll but are not one of the rich clubs.  I'm
    dying with them this year, and the fun I get with them right now is
    watching the HR and RBI race.  That's all I've got to look forward to,
    other than the development of Travis Fryman.  However, if I had someone
    in the catagory of Clemens, then I'd at least know that in 1 of every 4
    games or so, we stand a chance of winning without having to put a few
    outa the park.  My longterm infield combo of Whitaker and Trammel is
    aging, and won't be around that much longer.  So, I go with what
    they've got.
    
    JD, try not to let SOME of the Sox fans get to you.  They are NOT
    indicative of all Sox fans.  I can empathize with you somewhat, having
    lived here all my life and never being a Sox fan.  Matter of fact, I
    spend a lot of my youth having to listen to Yankee fans lord it over
    everyone back in the 50's.  Back then, I also followed the Dodgers, who
    finally won a WS in '55.  That kinda got the monkey off of my back as
    far as the Yankees were concerned.  
    
    I caught h*ll during 1967, particularly when the Sox won the pennant on
    the last day as my Tigers lost to the Angels.  But, I sure made up for
    it, and more, in 1968.
    
    New Englanders love their Sox, and hate to see them lose so often and
    for so long.  But at least they are loyal, for whatever their reasons
    are.
    
    You can't have your cake and eat it, too.
    
    Lee
29.1357Maybe a rear runner.CUBIC7::DIGGINSOrson Wells, Rosie Ruiz, MrTFri Jun 26 1992 11:5212
How anyone can accuse a Red Sox fan of being a 'front runner' is
beyond me! 

Cripes you shoulda heard me at the lasted game I went to! I had 
the crowd roaring and gave it to the bums cuz they deserved it!

8^)



Steve
29.1358SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Jun 26 1992 12:163
       Didn't the Fabulous NY Football Giants draw huge crowds when they
    were at the bottom a the heap?
                                   Denny
29.1359PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 26 1992 13:0513
29.1360CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Jun 26 1992 13:1727
First off - the sheeps line is actually atributed to one of the BoSox's own
writers.   It's been used by lots of folks since.  Don't know why, but it
does get a rise out of folks!

Denny - yep, Giants always drew well.  I was one of those folks treking from 
Yankee Stadium to the Yale Bowel to the Meadowlands following them.  
But I havent' seen any airplanes circling Fenway with messages like they
did over the Meadowlands.  Haven't seen or heard of season ticket holders
burning their tickets in the parking lot.    Besides, IMO, theres a huge 
difference between Football fans and baseball fans.  Something primal about
football, but cerebral about baseball.   

I guess it stems from the attitude of Sox fans - most at least - I know all
of the Sox fans in here never fit this category - but when I first came to
Boston in 1977 I had never met sports fans who thought they were so damn
knowledgeable and fantastic as Sox, and for the most part, Boston fans.  It
was hilarious.   From "X City only got X people at their championship parade,
to, well fans in X city are thugs, to fans in X city don't know nothing..."

Many Sox fans seem to think only if you know the amount of hairs on Dalton
Jones' butt are you a real fan.  

And remember, I've always claimed fans are fans - no matter where you go.  Fans
without champions tend to dwell on whether they are the best, or how much
they fill the park....

JD
29.1361FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Jun 26 1992 13:5532
    Bob Ryan has pointed out consistently over this season that there is
    whining streak in Sox fans that sets them apart from others.  They seem
    to feel personally let down when the Sox don't win and take it
    personally that the Sox never win a championship.  I take it to the
    next extreme - a lot of Sox fans get pleasure out of this misery and I
    think this portion of fans will drift away if the Sox ever win a World
    Series.
    
    As far as the sheep of New England goes, it has been argued that the
    Sox have no incentive to do anything to improve the team when they sell
    2,000,000 tickets before the season starts.  I'm not sure if any team
    in baseball except Toronto and Los Angeles does that year after year
    (and I'm not sure if Baltimore will either once the novelty of OP@CY
    wears off).  Lee, I see your point about the Tigers but I would feel
    better about the Sox actually doing something to improve if the fans
    took a "Show me" attitude and didn't buy as many tickets before the
    season started (and/or cancelled NESN in droves).  I'm not talking
    about the signings that turned out to be mistakes either, I'm talking
    about getting really solid front office management.
    
    Finally, JD, your feelings when you came to Boston are exactly the
    sorts of feelings that pissed me off about New York fans, teams and
    media in my younger days before I stopped caring so much.  Consider the
    1970 Knicks title.  The Knicks won 1 title compared the Celtics just
    finishing their streak of 11 in 13 years, and all we heard from New York
    is "Greatest Team Ever, Greatest Dynasty Ever".  Also, I grew up a
    Celtics fan and it annoyed me no end that the Knicks seemed to get 10
    times as many books ever written about them for having won one
    championship as the Celtics ever did for winning 11 out of 13.  It
    works all ways.
    
    John
29.1362PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 26 1992 14:178
29.1363JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Jun 26 1992 14:365
    Mac, my guess is that JD is referring to the "Roger Clemens -- Greatest
    Pitcher of All Time?" note in the Red Sox notesfile...
                                    
    
    py
29.1364CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Jun 26 1992 14:3615
Mac -

More and more I'm convinced that you only read what you want to - you know -
the stuff you say I do (or T, or others).  Its look in the mirror time, bud.
More than one person has trumpeted him as the greatest.

John H.

Funny.  Being in New York, everyone I knew was very cognizent of the fact
taht the Celtics teams were much better and greater, history-wise, then 
the Knicks.  But one thing I noticed when I came hear, was the Boston papers
always reported things from New York which fit their needs.  I've always
felt that Boston has some sort of complex about New York.

JD
29.1365FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Jun 26 1992 14:407
    Boston does have an inferiority complex to New York in a lot of ways. 
    You may be right about the Boston media reporting what served its
    purposes, but there were many books written about New York's one title
    and it seemed to me at the time, many more than were written about the
    Celtics.
    
    John
29.1366Civilization ends after the Hudson RiverSALES::THILLFri Jun 26 1992 15:1513
    I think a lot of places might have an inferiority complex regarding New
    York. In Boston, it used to annoy me how college kids from the NY area
    would sneer that Bawston is such a smawl town and that everything in
    New York is better, etc. Sure, it's bigger in NY, but that extreme goes
    in all directions, such as crime, high prices like $1,000 for a cup of
    cawfee, etc. Not to get on a New York bashing tirade, but I wonder if 
    Philadelphia feels the same way, after all, it's the next major city down 
    the road from New York in the other direction. I got the impression that 
    a lot of New Yorkers would look at Boston and other major cities (that 
    aren't as big and "important as NY) as the equivalent of say, Scranton, 
    Pee-Ay.
    
    Tom 
29.1367AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateFri Jun 26 1992 15:189
    	Giants fans supporting a losing team means they're great fans.
    
    	Red Sox fans supporting a losing team means they're sheep.
    
    	Why?  'Cuz JD says so.
    
    	You must be inhaling that rarefied Wilton air.
    
    				/Don        
29.1368GIAMEM::LEFEBVREEHaskell,ConradDobler,JDFri Jun 26 1992 16:012
    
    
29.1369ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Jun 26 1992 17:068
    I've never really noticed that Philadelphia has an inferiority complex
    relative to NY. In Boston you sense this all the time, in Philly I
    can't remember ever having that feeling.
    
    Remember: an inferiority complex can be based on reality (.5 :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1370PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jun 29 1992 13:216
29.1371Those vagabond blues...CAMONE::MAZURIt ain't the meat, it's the lotion.Mon Jun 29 1992 13:2921
    I had the same feeling but even worse, growing up and going to college
    in Buffalo.  Those Lon-GUY-lan-ders and folks from THE CITY (what city?
    as if THE CITY said it all) would come up to the SUNY campus in Buffalo
    and piss and moan all 4 years about how backward Buffalo was and how
    you couldn't get a decent deli sandwich and how there was no great art
    museums etc, etc, etc...  What a bunch of crybabies. Rude!, let's not
    even start on that tropic.  Well, I honestly feel that most
    Buffalonians (All Upstaters I should say) didn't have an inferiority
    complex to NY (a general inferiorirty complex, I'll admit, but not to
    NY).  I think we were glad we were 350 miles from the cess pool. 
    Unfortunately we had to pay huge taxes to support the problems of one
    of the worlds major cities.  Despise is the word.  Anyway, when these
    crybaby students got there degrees, guess where they headed ?  To THE
    CITY ?  Naw, they stayed in Buffalo (oh that horrid place) or moved
    elsewhere.  But most of them didn't return.  They eventually saw the
    light.
    
    I honestly believe that most New Yawkers strive to get out of the city,
    not the other way around.  Unfortunately they'll never admit it, that
    would tarnish there only "badge".
    
29.1372Which City?SALES::THILLMon Jun 29 1992 13:5010
    "THE CITY..." Haw! I almost forgot about that expression. OF COURSE
    there is only one city on the planet worth that distinction. I once stayed 
    at a youth hostel in the suburbs of Paris. I asked a woman who was from 
    the NY area where she got something-or-other, and she said in The City.
    "Oh, in Paris?" She looked at me as if I had 3 haids!
    
    Didn't the SF Warriors have "The City" on their uniforms in the '60s? I
    always thought that was a little odd. Now if that was the Knicks.... 
    
    Tom
29.1373NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jun 29 1992 13:5426
    
> More and more I'm convinced that you only read what you want to - you know -
> the stuff you say I do (or T, or others).  Its look in the mirror time, bud.
> More than one person has trumpeted him as the greatest.
    
    Actually, I've seen this topic raised in quite a few places in the 
    *national* media in the past year, by Elias, Baseball Weekly, Bill James 
    and others.  The mere fact that someone raised the question in the 
    RED_SOX conference is not so preposterous.  What's preposterous is that 
    such discussion is immediately relegated by some to the domain of 
    parochial self-interest.  Open your eyes, man!
    
    It's also generally the national media which hypes Boston's fans as
    knowledgeable and critical, which romanticizes Fenway Park and Boston
    Garden, etc.  Granted, such praise has undoubtedly gone to the heads of
    some Boston fans, but that doesn't change the fact of where it comes
    from.  When a noted baseball lover like Bob Costas comes out (or used to 
    come out) to Fenway Park and proceeds to wax poetic about the entire
    atmosphere around Fenway, I don't see why Bostonians should be held
    responsible and have to apologize.  Maybe some fans could be a bit more 
    humble, but why do these national figures say such things if they don't
    believe them?  Exactly how far does this Boston sports conspiracy
    reach?
    
    glenn
    
29.1374CAMONE::WAYDeath before DishonorMon Jun 29 1992 13:5626
People always tend to be divided on NY City.

There is some cool stuff to do there, no doubt, and I love the museums, 
personally.

But, being a country boy, I've always felt "It's a GREAT place to visit
for a day, but I wouldn't want to live there".


When I lived in Paris for 6 months, I really missed the country, the
fresh air, the birds and crickets and stuff.  When I'd go running after
work, I'd go into the Bois de Boulogne, which was as "country" as you
could get in my section of Paris.   Again, a damn interesting place,
but not one where I'd like to live for the rest of my days.

(I'll never forget coming home for Thanksgiving, and getting out of the
car at my house.   It was a cold November night, and the moon, if not
full, was definitly waxing, and I got a good lungful of that cold country
fresh air.....  Heaven.)


The people I know who live in The City, are pretty nice, but they don't
understand why I like it out in the boonies so much 8^)


'Saw
29.1375CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jun 29 1992 14:1817
Glenn -

For a long time, many of the 'powers' in national sports journalism were
from the general Boston area - or had attended Boston College or Harvard,
for example.

It has lessened, a little, but still the town wields influence beyond
its size and importance.  

Big deal about Fenway.  Same is said about Wrigley.  Folks get teary eyed
about these old parks.

And my personal stance on Elias, Bill James, etc., is well known.  I don't
value them, and am damn pround to say I've never picked one up and had
my mind sullied with their dastistics (tm).

JD
29.1376GUSHER::WAUGAMANMon Jun 29 1992 15:1719
                        
> And my personal stance on Elias, Bill James, etc., is well known.  I don't
> value them, and am damn pround to say I've never picked one up and had
> my mind sullied with their dastistics (tm).
  
    That's besides the point.  I don't value a lot of it either.  In
    my opinion Bill James has turned into something of an pompous jerk
    (I picked up his latest book at the store, saw that every other
    paragraph contained a profanity or some other kind of snide commentary,
    and put it right back-- we're talking about baseball, and if it's
    something my kids shouldn't read I don't want to own it), but that
    doesn't change the fact that such topics have national exposure.  Do
    you refuse to watch baseball on ESPN on principle, too?  If you want 
    to stick your head in the sand and pretend that discussion of the 
    future legacy of players like Roger Clemens are only the lunatic 
    rantings of blinded locals, feel free, I guess...
    
    glenn
    
29.1377SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Wed Jul 01 1992 10:418
    Sox beat the Tigers last night, 8-5.
    
    So, this AM, there was a piece of an interview by a WBZ sports reporter
    (didn't catch his name) with Scott Cooper, to wit:  "Do you think this
    victory will ignite a winning streak?"  What an asinine question to
    publicly ask a ballplayer.  What's he supposed to say, NO?
    
    Lee
29.1378Says that Burleson is a jerkCTHQ1::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed Jul 01 1992 13:1123
    Anyone see the Glob article on Bill Lee this AM?
    Bill is back touring New England Grey Sox, whatever that is. Only
    had a chance to quickly glance at the article and Lee came up with a
    couple of his usual Spaceman quips. Now I think Lee is full of bull,
    but he can be entertaining and he doesn't disappoint. When told that
    his old nemesis the Gerbil Zim was retiring after the season, Lee
    quipped, "Why wait?". He spewed the usual stuff about 25 guys trying
    to please the manager back when he was playing as opposed to the
    manager nowadays trying to please 25 guys.
    Actually had some good things to say about Hobson. Said that Butch
    wasn't really the kick-ass type of guy the press has made him out to
    be. Lee states that Butch is a real nice guy and a good friend. Must
    be intimating that he'll be eaten alive as BoSox manager. 
      Then he got started on Matt Young. Vintage Lee. Stated something
    about running Matt 6 miles every day at the beach to exhaust him.
    Lee said that when you run your brain secretes some enzyme that sloes
    you down and relaxes you. He said that that was all Young needed; to
    be exhausted and relaxed. Said the mind thinks clearer when exhausted.
    Hey maybe he's got something there! Nothin' else has worked with Young.
    Think what you want of Lee, but he makes good copy.
    
    MikeL
    
29.1379MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 01 1992 14:152
    Is Zim really retiring after this season?  That's the first I've heard
    of it.
29.1380MCIS2::DHAMELLeave a Beep after the message.Wed Jul 01 1992 14:445
    
    Sounds to me like Matt Young's injury was "ordered" to make a roster
    move.
    
    
29.1381JURAN::MCKAYWed Jul 01 1992 15:285
    Mac I had read somewhere (Globe or Herald) that Zim was contemplating
    retirement due to health reasons.  The guess was that Gary Allenson
    would be called up to Third base coaching duties.
    
    Jimbo
29.1382SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Jul 01 1992 16:063
      He probably hit a big Twin-tri over at Blunderland!
    
                                         Denny
29.1383As attested to on tee vee!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Jul 01 1992 16:219
    
    I wonder if instead of running 6 miles a day, Matt should graze?
    
    same effect huh?
    
    I remain,
    (writers block here...)
    Kev
    
29.1384Try a pulled cerebellumMR4DEC::WENTZELLDon't say I didn't warn youWed Jul 01 1992 16:387
In the Globe today Young claims he is injured (groin) and that this injury has 
affected his performance his last few outings because he can't push off the 
mound.

All I can say is...yeah, right.

Scott
29.1385needs a personal shrink, call Dr. LeeCTHQ1::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed Jul 01 1992 16:5012
    Doormatt is right Scott,
    
    Ya see since his groin is bothering him, he really can't push off the
    mound so when a runner takes a lead off first base, Matt can't throw
    there. Now that really is affecting his performance because you don't
    see any more baseballs flying into the right field stands. So it really
    has affected his performance, you see. We're not seeing his normal
    repertoire.
    
    HTH
    MikeL
    
29.1386Homo IgnoramusCTHQ1::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed Jul 01 1992 16:539
    Forgot to mention this,
    
    Heard on the radio this AM that Young is upset that his family has been
    harassed by fans recently. Don't know any more details, but this makes
    me sick. #@$%^ fans can boo all they want, but leave the poor bastard
    and his family alone. What do they think this is, real life!!
    
    MikeL
    
29.1387Makes me sick...SALES::THILLWed Jul 01 1992 17:033
    Well, Boston fans ARE the most knowlegeable in the country (just ask
    us), so I'm sure there was a good resaon to harass the family. It's
    just the usual biased media only telling one side of the story.  
29.1388CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Jul 01 1992 17:147
Tom -

I'm with you.  Can't believe how fans from the greatest sports town in the
world could act like that.   Must be lies from New York journalists or
something...

JD
29.1389Hell, Bonilla isn't even playing that badly...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 01 1992 17:2011
          
> I'm with you.  Can't believe how fans from the greatest sports town in the
> world could act like that.   Must be lies from New York journalists or
> something...
    
    Wonder if Matt Young would like to trade places with Bobby Bonilla for
    a day?  Recent New York tabloid headlines have called Bonilla "a liar" 
    and by the pet nickname "Bobby Bogus"...
    
    glenn
    
29.1390Isn't NU is summer session, JD? 8^)'sCTHQ1::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed Jul 01 1992 17:234
    Nah,
    Must be dumb NY college students here fer summer school. Couldn't be
    any of our illustrious natives.
    
29.1391Fans prove their ignorance again and againSHALOT::MEDVIDthe strain of smilingWed Jul 01 1992 17:308
>              -< Hell, Bonilla isn't even playing that badly... >-
    
    In fact, he's now in third place for the NL outfield balloting for the
    All-Star Game.  How ridiculous.  He's followed by Strawberry.  Hell,
    I've got to put Felix Jose, Andy VanSlyke, or Larry Walker before these
    two over-hyped mediocrities.
    
    	--dan'l
29.1392These fans SipRDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKEWed Jul 01 1992 17:3711
    These "fans" that are harrassing Matt Young's family........are they
    the same outstanding folks who jeered and hooted at Jim Eisenreich as
    he was suffering a fit on the grass in CF? Or those same knowledgable
    folks who tossed missiles at Mickey Rivers? Would they, per chance, be
    the ones who were so kind to Bob Stanley's family a few years back?
    
    Hey, Young stinks. But I don't recall EVER seeing any of his kids blow
    a lead for the Sox.
    
    Rich
     
29.1393SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Jul 01 1992 17:405
       I think Mrs Doormatt and the younguns were getting on Matt and the
    Fenway Faithful were just sticking up for him!
                                 Denny   8^)
    
     
29.1394CTHQ1::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed Jul 01 1992 17:558
    Agreed Rich,
    But let's be careful to characterize them as the lunatic fringe.
    They're not indicative ( I hope!) of the mainstream BoSox fandom,
    as you well know. Plus, we don't want to get JD started again!
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
29.1395RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKEWed Jul 01 1992 18:469
    Mike, I know these morons are the fringe. And I know that the majority
    of fans, no matter where they live and who they root for, are out for
    fun and enjoyment.
    
    But it seems that the fringe is sometimes the loudest and most
    obnoxious in Boston.
    
    Rich
    
29.1396No "Fringe" = everyone is "normal"SALES::THILLWed Jul 01 1992 18:5813
    The "Fringe" is always the loudest, most obnoxious. By definition, it
    can only be the fringe who do things like....
     
    Batteries thrown at Dave Parker from the stands....
    "Coke is it" chants at certain players just off suspension....
    "Keg party at my house" to recovering alcoholics...
    English/German/Dutch hooligans in Sweden...
    Various drunks/morons in the Bleachers.... 
    
    "Normal" fans don't do any of these things. It's just a handful of
    idiots who paint the rest with a broad brush.
    
    Tom 
29.1397NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 01 1992 19:0413
               
    I wish that "these fans" and their stories would be accurately 
    and religiously detailed in the sports section of the local papers as 
    opposed to only broadly alluded to in brief news reports.  There would 
    be many purposes to doing so: 1) it would serve as public humiliation 
    and punishment of those actually involved, 2) it would serve to place 
    specific blame as opposed to the generalities used to give a bad name
    to everyone else, 3) it would serve as a deterrent to such behavior in
    the future, and 4) it would prevent myth-making of the kind involved 
    with the infamous inflatable doll and Eisenreich incidents.
    
    glenn
    
29.1398AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateWed Jul 01 1992 19:094
    	Okay, okay, it was me taunting Matt Young Jr.  He went to throw
    a slush puppie at me and hit the guy three rows up.
    
    				/Don
29.1399Less attention is better...SASE::SZABOA Day In The Life.Wed Jul 01 1992 19:118
    glenn, while what you listed may deter some of the fringe idiots, in
    place, it would attract attention-seekers.  In fact, it would escalate
    the problem, I would think.  Yes, public humiliation would affect you,
    me, and most everyone in this file.  But, these idiots causing the
    problems have no conscience and couldn't care less...
    
    Hawk
    
29.1400CTHQ1::LEARYSix, two, and even.Wed Jul 01 1992 19:123
    HAHAHA /,
    Only three rows, mo' control than Pop!
    
29.1401CAMONE::WAYYou think slower when you grazeWed Jul 01 1992 19:148
If society is represented by a bell curve, then there's always gonna
be a fringe....


Scary thought!


'Saw
29.1402A bell curve is alot like rugby!SASE::SZABOA Day In The Life.Wed Jul 01 1992 19:151
    
29.1403CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Jul 01 1992 20:054
Hell Saw, if society was represented by a Matt Young curve, almost everyone
would be on the fringe!  ;-)

JD
29.1404MCIS2::DHAMELLeave a Beep after the message.Wed Jul 01 1992 20:107
    
    I heard the Slush Puppy was fired from the sixth floor of the
    Prudential building, although theorists say a second was slung from a
    grassy knoll in right field.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1405RDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKEWed Jul 01 1992 20:294
    Glenn - how is the fact that bleacher idiots taunted Eisnreich a myth?
    
    Rich
    
29.1406It's just been accepted but I've never seen the source...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 01 1992 20:5518
    
    > Glenn - how is the fact that bleacher idiots taunted Eisnreich a myth?
    
    I believe that the incident has been mythologized.  It wasn't reported
    at the time; I think someone called it to Peter Gammons' attention
    later on and he wrote about it and the thing took on a life of its own.
    I've heard from someone who was there that no one knew what was going
    on (Eisenreich's condition was unknown at the time) and most fans 
    thought he was putting on some kind of act between innings and a few 
    responded to it.  I just don't believe that the centerfield bleacher 
    area was this frothing mass of humanity that drove Eisenreich to a 
    nervous breakdown like it's been made out to be.  I would once like to 
    hear Eisenreich's version of what happened from his point of view, 
    though.  It'll inevitably come up if he's sent to Boston as has been 
    rumored of late (but I'd say that's unlikely).
    
    glenn
    
29.1407EisenreichRDOVAX::POOLQ::BRAKEThu Jul 02 1992 12:3722
    Glenn, as I recall the incident (and it WAS reported on the next day),
    Eisenreich was playing for the Twins/Royals and was known to suffer from a
    condition that caused him to have involuntary spasms. Matter of fact,
    before the Twins/Royals series, there was a nice write up in the paper
    talking of Eisenreich's courage and the Twins'/Royals' patience and
    understanding.
    
    While in CF, Eisenreich began to experience a mild seizure. Hard to see
    twitches and such.
    
    Sadly, there were a few morons (The Fringe) who had been giving him a
    little hard time. They picked up immediately on what was happening and
    started carrying on and enlisting others to join him. Admittedly, only
    a few participated but they made alot of noise and yelled derisive
    remarks as a trainer led Eisenreich off the field.
    
    As far as I know, Eisenreich never commented on the incident, publicly.
    But, it was not a myth, it did happen, and it was reported, though not
    sensationalized, the next day.
    
    Rich
    
29.1408NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 02 1992 13:2725
                                          
    Your recollections on Eisenreich are probably closer to the truth than 
    mine, Rich.  I guess my only objection is that with every passing year, 
    in Ainge/Rollins fashion, the story has moved towards how the Boston
    bleacherites taunted Eisenreich into a nervous breakdown.  While a
    couple of ignorant jerks probably did taunt him as it was going on, I 
    don't think they were the cause of his problems (I feel a lot worse 
    about some of the stuff Dave Stewart put up with while warming up in 
    the bullpen where the hecklers knew *exactly* what they were doing).  I 
    practically live out in those CF bleachers and while there are some real
    sharp wits out there who are a lot of fun I've never seen anything
    remotely similar to that kind of cruelty, so I'm probably just defensive 
    about it.
    
    I did see the comments from Matt Young, and I honestly don't know if
    there's a solution to that one.  The fans weren't heckling Young's
    family, they were heckling *him* before Young's wife told them to show
    some class around the kids.  Hopefully they did, but I can tell you
    from experience there's no place in that ballpark (except maybe The 600
    Club) where you're not going to hear Matt Young jeered and booed. 
    Whether or not that's acceptable behavior is another debate in itself.
    Within bounds, my personal opinion is that it is...
    
    glenn
      
29.1409Is that flamingo or flamingoe?MCIS2::DHAMELHonk if you hate noise pollutionThu Jul 02 1992 14:0822
    
    So what's the story with the Red Sox now playing rock 'n' roll between
    innings?  C'mon, do they *have* to be like fifteen-thousand-eight-
    hundred-and-twenty-one other parks/arenas that play "Centerfield",
    "Rock 'n' Roll, Pt. II", "We Will Rock You" and all those other tunes
    every time there's a break?  Like, do people go "Hey, let's go to the
    game this weekend, I hear they play music now?"
    
    I'm neutral on the organ music.  I can take it or leave it, except that
    there is a warm, fuzzy feeling hearing "Take me out to the ballgame" in
    the middle of the seventh.  Tradition and nostalgia and all that rot.
    
    Hey, here's a novel idea:  How 'bout they play the "Charge!" call on
    the trumpet everytime they get a runner on base.  Oh, and as long as
    we're talking tacky, why not a goofy mascot who prenends to harrass
    the umpires?  Yuk, yuk....that gets the fans goin' every time.
    
    Hey, while they're at it, let's plant some plastic pink flamingoes
    in the outfield.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1410Hire Tommy LaSordid as manager! Wayne Newton sings the N.A.!NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 02 1992 14:111
    
29.1411or was it everyone in Fenway, or all of Boston?MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 02 1992 14:177
29.1412MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 02 1992 14:191
    Dickstah, why stop there?  Let's get Dot Races at Fenway!!!!
29.1413AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateThu Jul 02 1992 15:284
    	I think they should play the song that those left on the Titanic
    were singing just before it sank.
    
    				/Don
29.1414CAMONE::WAYYou think slower when you grazeThu Jul 02 1992 15:5710
>    	I think they should play the song that those left on the Titanic
>    were singing just before it sank.
    

Nearer my God to Thee, nearer to Thee.....



hth,
'Saw
29.1415MCIS2::DHAMELHonk if you hate noise pollutionThu Jul 02 1992 17:193
    
    Excuse my ignoramousness, but what's a Dot Race?
    
29.1416CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Thu Jul 02 1992 17:292
    
    
29.1417FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jul 02 1992 17:4410
    Dickstah,
    
    A dot race takes place on a message board at a ballpark.  It shows an
    oval track with 3 lanes, each lane has a dot in it.  The dots race
    around the track.  It's the sort of thing that's baseball purists
    totally disdain while nouveau fans love them.  Sort of like rock music
    instead of organ music, placards, cheerleaders, mascots, the DH, phony
    turf and lights.   :-)
    
    Ninj 
29.1418SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 02 1992 18:013
       So what's 6, 2, and even? I know Turnpike Joe said it in a
    commercial once.
                               Denny
29.1419JARETH::YANKOWSKASMeghan is 15 months old todayThu Jul 02 1992 18:098
    re .1418:
    
    I remember hearing "6 2 and even" on the Dick Tracy cartoons...one of
    Tracy's assistants (Joe Jitsu?) used to say it as he was signing off on
    his wristwatch radio.  Don't know if that's where it originated.
    
    
    py
29.1420AXIS::ROBICHAUD25 or 6 to 4Thu Jul 02 1992 18:162
    
    
29.1421CAMONE::WAYYou think slower when you grazeThu Jul 02 1992 18:178
36,24,36



'Saw_for_Hawk
    
    

29.1422only 36!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 02 1992 18:342
       Being a little less than generous there aren't ya 'Saw?
                               Denny
29.1423DCAMONE::WAYYou think slower when you grazeThu Jul 02 1992 19:121
29.1424not so great to be backCNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentMon Jul 06 1992 17:1710
 How can Wade Boggs have 600K+ plus votes for the All Star game? Only way
 I can figure it is that his agent hired some ole timers at 5 bucks an
 hour to stuff the ballot box.....

 Po Po Roger....You just knew he was hurting to be pitching that bad...

 mike


29.1425FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Jul 06 1992 17:4410
    Mike, it has to do with what happens when fans get the vote.
    
    Most fans are not knowledgeable.  Most fans will therefore take the
    easy way out and vote for the familiar name(s) when filling out an
    All-Star ballot.  All-Star voting is biased against players in the
    early parts of their careers and toward players in the later parts of
    their careers.  All-Star voting is dumb.  All-Star voting is not worth
    getting excited over.
    
    John
29.1426PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 06 1992 17:482
    And afterall, it is the All-STAR game and not the
    All-Best-Player-Between-March-And-June Game.
29.1427face it guys I'm right this timeCNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentMon Jul 06 1992 19:546
 Sorry guys but the amount of the votes reeks of ballot stuffing to me. He's
 like 300K votes ahead of anyone else. Given his on-going contract fueding
 I smell a rat....

 mike
29.1428JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasMon Jul 06 1992 20:078
    re AL All-Star 3B:
    
    I voted for Edgar Martinez.
    
    Robin Ventura also deserves it ahead of Boggs this year IMO.
    
    
    py
29.1429like Ninj says - yecch!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeMon Jul 06 1992 20:218
    there was a blurb in SI about a bunch of DJ's in Pittsburgh (?) who
    mounted a campaign in shopping malls to get 2 guys voted in.  I forget
    who they were but the were both #3 in the voting but are #1 in
    dastistics.
    
    hth,
    Kev
    
29.1430FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Jul 06 1992 20:2410
    There ain't nothing you cain do about ballot stuffing.  There ain't
    nothing you cain do about about the voting.
    
    It's a meaningless mid-season exhibition game.  Why do so many people
    get so bent out of shape about who's playing?
    
    The game has always been an award for meritorious service to the game
    anyway since a past-prime Babe Ruth made it in 1933 and 1934.
    
    John
29.1431NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jul 06 1992 20:3811
                                                                          
    I really don't think there's any ballot-stuffing going on in Boston in
    behalf of Boggs.  The guy is just not that popular in Boston, period,
    and unlike with the situation in Toronto where every hometown player
    is receiving a high number of votes, Boston players are not getting 
    many in general (nor do they deserve to).  He's riding on past 
    accomplishments and national reputation, or as I heard someone suggest,
    with the kids on his rookie card value...
    
    glenn
    
29.1432FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Jul 06 1992 20:429
    True.  I read somewhere this weekend that if you left the All-Star vote
    up to the kids, they'd still vote for Bo Jackson because the value of
    his cards is so high.
    
    The Red Sox, to their credit, do not seem to encourage the Fenway
    Faithful to vote for the Sox players as much as other teams encourage
    their fans to vote for their own homeboys.
    
    John
29.1433CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentMon Jul 06 1992 20:4417
                                                                          
>    I really don't think there's any ballot-stuffing going on in Boston in
>    behalf of Boggs.  The guy is just not that popular in Boston, period,
>    and unlike with the situation in Toronto where every hometown player
>    is receiving a high number of votes, Boston players are not getting 
>    many in general (nor do they deserve to).  He's riding on past 
>    accomplishments and national reputation, or as I heard someone suggest,
>    with the kids on his rookie card value...
    
    
    That's part of my point Glen. The Locals aren't stuffing the boxes for
    him so who is? Don't seem like Kids could make a 300K vote difference.
    But an agent paying people to punch out them little Wade spots, now that
    sounds plausible.....

   mike 

29.1434Hey Hey My My... Sox are dyin'SHARE::DERRYGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGGONGTue Jul 07 1992 12:1613
    Okay.  I'll be the first to admit that I haven't seen a Sox game since
    Clemens 2nd try at number 10 (and I won't watch them again until he
    wins 10).  
    
    They are now 12 games back and will soon be sharing rent with Cleveland
    so... what the heck is going on?  You can't blame it on injuries and
    you can't blame Hobson, ALTHOUGH, I thought this guy was supposed to be
    some hard nose, take no crap, put in 100% every game type of guy.  I
    certainly haven't seen any indication that he's pushing any buttons...
    
    Are they going to unload all those big $$$ nonproducers?  Go with the
    kids?  Will the fans be willing to accept that scenario?  Would they
    care?  Do you?
29.1435FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jul 07 1992 12:3335
    Mike, while it may seem plausible it's highly unlikely.
    
    Wade Boggs, like it or not, is arguably the best-known third baseman by
    the general populace in the American League.  He's been playing at a
    consistently high level for a long time, he's won a lot of batting
    titles and he was involved in a major off-the-field scandal.  All of
    this makes him the most famous third baseman currently playing.  Note
    that I didn't say he's the best third baseman currently playing,
    because he's probably not (and I find it hard to say who's the best at
    anything) but he's certainly the best-known.
    
    If you restricted All-Star voting to rotisserie nuts, you'd get the guy
    who was having the best season (and I have no idea who that is).  If
    you restricted it to a combination of players and media, you might get
    the guy having the best season at the position or you may not, because
    these folks may vote on reputation just as much as statistics.  But,
    take your average casual fan at a ballpark.  S/he goes to a game, is
    handed a ballot and starts to punch the little squares.  S/he comes to
    3rd base, American League, and thinks "Boggs.  He's had lots of good
    seasons before and probably is having another good one.  I'll vote for
    him.  Besides, I don't know who half these other guys are."  It's a
    conditioned reflex.
    
    Boggs didn't make some games early in his career when his numbers
    probably warranted him going.  Cal Ripken probably didn't.  Kirby
    Puckett probably didn't.  Ryne Sandberg probably didn't.  These guys
    will probably make it until they die.  Heck, if Steve Garvey's name was
    still on the ballot he'd probably still be going.
    
    All-Star games and voting are as much lifetime achievement awards as
    anything else.  Once a player becomes established in the minds of the
    fans as an All-Star he'll continue to make the team whether or not his
    performance actually warrants it.
    
    John 
29.1436MCIS2::DHAMELHonk if you hate noise pollutionTue Jul 07 1992 13:0111
    
    Time to clean house.  Clemens is the only keeper, IMO.  Everybody else
    goes out on the yard sale table.  Get as many young prospects as
    possible and sort 'em out later. O.K., keep Viola, too.
    
    This team was a lot more fun when they hit the hell out of the ball
    but still had a lousy record. Where's Dick Stuart when we really need
    him?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1437It's over, long gone...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 07 1992 13:0214
    
    You can't blame the Sox' demise on injuries because they were stinking
    it up even when everyone was relatively healthy, but injuries have now 
    taken over and precluded any shot at a comeback.  Earlier in the year 
    Sox' fans were lamenting the fact that the guys who were in there 
    weren't meeting expectations with the bats in scoring so few runs, but 
    now with Greenwell and Burks shelved and with Plantier in and out I 
    think they're exactly meeting expectations in scoring so few runs. 
    When you look at that everyday lineup now it's deflating to the spirit
    before the game has even started...
    
    glenn
    
     
29.1438Mo *DID* hit a homer last night tho'CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeTue Jul 07 1992 13:131
    
29.1439PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 07 1992 13:494
29.1440AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateTue Jul 07 1992 15:191
    	I think they should keep Boggs now that he's shaved his moustache.
29.1441Not what they used to beCTHQ2::MCCULLOUGHComing soon: Lindsey's Sister!!Tue Jul 07 1992 19:334
    The explaination of bad years by Boggs, Burks and Greenwell is
    partially injuries (small part), and largely diminished talent and poor
    attituded.  I predict Boggs will come alive in the second half of the
    season, in a dialing-for-dollars move.
29.1442FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Jul 07 1992 19:538
    I don't think anyone is going to want to sign Boggs for anywhere near
    the money he wants.  I think the Red Sox were smart to not tie him up
    in a long-term contract before the season started.
    
    I predict also that a lot of these Red Sox players will find the market
    radically different when it comes time to sign their next contracts.
    
    John
29.1443PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 07 1992 19:5710
29.1444NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 07 1992 21:1419
                   
    The way Boggs is going, by the end of the year he'll be begging for 
    the two years, $8-9 million the Sox were offering before the season
    started.  No way is anyone going to give him a four-year, $15 million
    deal at this point.  Before the season started I thought that the Sox
    should have compromised with a three-year deal, but now it looks like
    they made the smart decision.
    
    Boggs doesn't have injuries as an excuse, but Greenwell's and Burks'
    injuries have only played a small part in their problems?  Greenwell's
    out for the year after they opened up his elbow and found a major tear
    and tendon damage.  There's no way a career .300 hitter drops to .220
    with zero power otherwise.  And I wasn't even totally dissatisfied with 
    Burks before went down with the back injury.  He was the only guy 
    really hitting some home runs and driving in some runs on the entire 
    team.  Injuries to these two have hurt the Sox significantly...
    
    glenn
    
29.1445XCELR8::DHAMELHonk if you hate noise pollutionWed Jul 08 1992 13:0911
    
    Jeff Rearend, The Terminator, I mean the Firestarter, The Opener not
    The Closer, serves up another ninth inning meatball to George Brett
    to tie the game.  He must've thought Roger was pitching as was
    originally scheduled.
    
    Roger will need to shut out his opponents in order to have a chance for
    a win, and that most likely will go extra innings.
    
    -Dickstah, keening while passing water again
    
29.1446MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 09 1992 12:469
    
     "I'm sure every time I come to the plate and look up at that
    [owner's] sky box, I wanna hit the ball off the wall and hit 
    those three-run homers. It might have been a different year 
    if I'd have signed in spring training. It might have been a 
    totally different year."
    
                        _Wade Boggs on why he's batting .225 at
                         Fenway so far this year.
29.1447FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jul 09 1992 12:595
    I was at Fenway for the first time in a couple of months last night. 
    Dead ass on the field, apathetic in the stands and 3.5 hours to play a
    9 inning game.  It doesn't get any better than this.
    
    Ninj
29.1448Yawn! Another ball game...CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHComing soon: Lindsey's Sister!!Thu Jul 09 1992 14:068
re .1477 (Ninj)

Rat on.  These games (not just the Ded Sox) are getting out of hand in terms 
of length.  I can't put my finger on why, other than the increased commercial 
time.  I guess pitchers and batters are taking longer between pitches or 
something.  I know it makes it impossible to sit through an entire game.

=Bob=
29.1449FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jul 09 1992 15:0722
    1.  An extra minute of commercial time between innings adds up to 20
    minutes right there.
    
    2.  Either the strike zone is too small or pitchers don't know how to
    throw strikes anymore
    
    3.  Too many throws to first base
    
    4.  Too many pitching changes
    
    5.  Pitchers take too long to pitch when the bases are empty
    
    6.  Batters step out of the box too much.
    
    I didn't get out of the game until 11, got home at 1230, got to bed at
    1 and am just cooking along today on 5 hours sleep.
    
    To their credit however, the Sox are running the bases more
    aggressively (they're 4th in going from 1st to 3rd on singles) and
    performed a successful suicide squeeze last night.
    
    John
29.1450MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 09 1992 15:1612

    There seems to a double standard at work here. Rickey Henderson, the 
   all-time leading base stealer and inarguably the greatest lead-off 
   hitter of all-time, flexes his mighty ego and is instantly vilified
   yet Wade Boggs does the same and despite the fact that Wade holds zero
   records and the same amount of World Series rings and has played his
   whole career in a park conducive to his hitting style nary a word is
   said. Granted, Boggs is little more subtle about it but even so.

    
    
29.1451MCIS2::DHAMELOlympic Village IdiotThu Jul 09 1992 15:2310
    
    Re:  more agressive base running
    
    Yeah, like the Gerbil sending Vaughn home from second on a sharp
    single to shallow right.  The catcher took the throw and actually fell
    asleep waiting for Moe to get there and was jarred awake when Moe
    lumbered in like a man arriving home to the wife at 3 A.M.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1452FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jul 09 1992 15:273
    Where was Wade Boggs flexing his ego?  I didn't even see it.
    
    John
29.1453Agree 101% with Ninj. ZZZZZZZZZ...JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jul 09 1992 15:2714
    I for one am sick of hearing the Sox and their fans use the 600 Club
    as an excuse for this year's lackluster offense.
    
    They didn't show a lot of offensive moxie in a recent series at Tiger
    Stadium (very much a hitter's park) either.
    
    Even as a Orioles fan,  I must say that the Red Sox teams of the
    70s-early/mid 80s with tater bashers galore were fun to watch.
    
    Now, the only time I go out of my way to watch a Sox game is when
    Clemens is pitching.
    
    
    py
29.1454PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 09 1992 15:318
    But John, look at the entertainment time/dollar ratio now.  Baseball
    provides a better deal at $2/hr than a movie at $4.67/hr ;^).
    
    Tommy, what's your point?  I went back and reread that quote and didn't
    see anything about if I don't feel appreciated I don't think I can play
    100 %, or I don't feel appreciated so trade me, or I am the greatest. 
    I see a guy saying he screwed up by not signing that offer sheet back
    in spring training.
29.1455MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 09 1992 15:388
    
     I'm not just talking about that quote. I'm talking about a guy who
    has consistently referred to himself in the third person, a guy who
    thinks the other eight guys on the field are his supporting cast and
    now that he's struggling it's not because he isn't executing it's the
    front office's fault even though to everyone else on the planet it
    looks like they made a very wise move. 
    
29.1456PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 09 1992 15:412
    Ah yes, the old "Wade Boggs is a selfish person" attack.  I see the
    arguments for that are as weak as usual.
29.1457!0 great years and 0 WS ringsMONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 09 1992 15:4410

    "I've had 10 great years here. I went through [Mike]Torrez, Eck
    [Dennis Eckersley], [Jim]Rice and [Bob]Stanley all booed out of 
    town. Is that happening to me ? Are people saying, 'He's strugg-
    ling now we got him ?"

                             -Wade Boggs on being booed at Fenway
    
    
29.1458GIAMEM::LEFEBVREMakin' the run to GladewaterThu Jul 09 1992 15:474
    Don't dust off that mantel to make room for the NOTY trophy yet,
    Tom.
    
    Mark.
29.1459EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Thu Jul 09 1992 15:473
    re .1450
    
    Hold your tounge ! Ricky has more rings than Wade ....
29.1460MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 09 1992 15:549
    
     Doc, what I meant was Wade holds zero records and that same number of
    WS rings.
    
     Mark, I don't believe there should be a NotY which is why I didn't
    even bother to vote last year. However, I admit I'm stunbling badly 
    here. It *may* be because I don't have a leg to stand on but I never 
    let that stop me before.
    
29.1461PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 09 1992 16:0011
29.1462PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 09 1992 16:012
    And unless you've been living in a cave, you must have noticed the long
    history of Boggs bashing in Boston.
29.1463ROYALT::ASHEDon't leave me hangin, I wanna be ganginThu Jul 09 1992 16:0717
    
    >What are you fishing for here, Tommy?  Admission to race related
    >prejudice?
    
    Why does everything start leaning towards race in here?  What's
    the deal Mac?  It's starting to wear thin and I didn't see it mentioned
    by Tommy... maybe I missed it.
    
    Wade Boggs looks out for himself
    Rickey Henderson looks out for himself
    Barry Bonds looks out for himself
    Nolan Ryan just wants to play ball.
    Kirby Puckett wants to play ball in Minneapolis, but may move
    on.
    George Foreman looks out for the next burger in his direction.
    
    Anyone else we need to cover?
29.1464AXIS::ROBICHAUDNewYorkSaysNoSLAPingThu Jul 09 1992 16:159
	If you think the Sox games last long, imagine if the still had Fisk?
Man the games would be running into the next day every night!  And Paul I 
think you misread what people are saying about the 600Club.  It's not the 
reason why the Sox are boring, but the reason why the Sox fans are boring.  
I believe it's creeping yuppieism.  They don't allow blue jeans in the 
600Club, you have to pay for everything with plastic in the 600Club.  
Creeping yuppieism.

				/Don
29.1465200 hit clubJUNCO::GARRYboston red sox in 92Thu Jul 09 1992 16:167
    Re .1460
    
    One record that comes to mind right off is most consecutive 200 hit
    seasons
    
    
    Tom
29.1466MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 09 1992 16:194
    
     No Mac, it's even simpler than that. I don't like Wade. I never 
    have and I never will. He's a sleazy, egomaniacal, selfish, heart-
    less creep. And those are his good points.
29.1467AXIS::ROBICHAUDNewYorkSaysNoSLAPingThu Jul 09 1992 16:204
    	Come on Tommy, since Wade's shaved his moustache he don't look
    sleazy anymore.
    
    				/Don
29.1468George Foreman, you're Wendy's kind of peopleJARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jul 09 1992 16:307
    Trade just reported in the Red Sox notesfile -- Tom Bolton traded to
    Cincinnati for OF Billy Hatcher.
      
    re Walt, rollward on the line about Foreman...
    
    
    py
29.1469PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 09 1992 16:317
29.1470MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 09 1992 16:4014
    
    >> The last time Tommy brought up Rickey he said he didn't want to 
    >> say it was a race thing, but....

      Not exactly, Mac. What I said was that I was thinking the exact same
      as Glenn Waugaman when he said, "I really don't want to start another 
      race rathole, but I think in fairness without painting with too broad 
      a brush *some* cultural differences must be accounted for in a straight
      comparison between Henderson and Ryan.  Ryan grew up on a farm in Texas, 
      and Henderson grew up on the city streets of Oakland.  There are going 
      to be differences in philosophy based on environment, whether one likes 
      it or not."
    
    
29.1471NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 09 1992 16:5713
    
    I'll stand by that point.  However, as has been mentioned, it's not
    true that "never a word is said" about Boggs and his ego.  Turn on a
    sports talk show in Boston, any one of them, and you'll hear otherwise.  
    Even the quote that Tommy offered where Wade flexed the ego muscles a 
    bit explicitly mentioned that it was in response to being booed at
    Fenway.
    
    Wade Boggs is easily the most controversial figure of the past decade
    in Boston baseball history...
    
    glenn
    
29.1472FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jul 09 1992 17:459
    Boggs also gets rapped more for being selfish, for taking walks when
    the team needs him more to get a hit and for not adjusting his hitting
    to the situation than he does for acting like Rickey Henderson and
    calling attention to how great he is.
    
    Note I'm not saying that Boggs doesn't do this but my impression is
    that he doesn't - or if he has I can't remember him doing it.
    
    John
29.1473WWSSB::COOK_TThey don't call them serial wounders, do they?!Thu Jul 09 1992 17:5815
    Did anyone happen to catch the bit about Fenway Park last night on CNN?
    It seems that this MIT professor built scale models of Fenway and the
    surrounding area before and after the 600club was built in 1989.  He
    put both models in a wind tunnel and demonstrated the changed wind
    pattern.  He showed how before the wind used to blow straight out at
    center, but now it blows towards center and then back to the plate. 
    This fall he and his students will model it with some type of wing on
    top of the 600club to see they can get the wind pattern back to what it
    used to be.
    
    
    Conan
    
    So much for park effect! 8^)
    
29.1474PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 09 1992 18:207
    Wow, this made CNN?  It has made the rounds of the local news and
    talkshows.  There is some discussion on it in the Sox notesfile.
    
    John, I can sympathize with you about last night's game.  I was at home
    watching it all.  That was some real bad baseball interspersed with
    some highlight film material by both sides.  How can 2 teams look so
    bad one minute and so good the next?
29.1475FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jul 09 1992 18:257
    I really long for the days when 2.5 hours was a long game.  It's
    getting to the point now where I don't enjoy going to night games
    because I get home too late.  I'm an extreme morning person.
    
    I'd also like to see the Sox start their home games at 7PM.
    
    John
29.1476CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentThu Jul 09 1992 18:406
 I'd like to see the Soxs start their homegames in FLorida myself...
 
 ;^)

 
29.1477WWSSB::COOK_TThey don't call them serial wounders, do they?!Thu Jul 09 1992 18:4410
    re .1474
    
    Yup, CNN.  They interviewed Butch, and he said something to the
    effect.."So this guy is from MIT?  He must be right! I only graduated
    from the University of Alabama!". The wind pattern was dramatic, in the
    way it would blow out and then curl down under itself and head back to
    the mound.
    
    Conan
    
29.1478CAMONE::WAYValhalla I am coming!Thu Jul 09 1992 19:0510
Walt,

You missed one:


	The Chainsaw is looking for how Emilio Lizardo became John Worfin....


hth,
'Saw
29.1479SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Jul 10 1992 10:463
    Ha ha ha, good one, Mike.  :*)
    
    lEe
29.1480EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Fri Jul 10 1992 15:124
    re .1463
    
    I've noticed this lately from Mac The Knife as well ... a little
    backlash Mac ?
29.1481PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 10 1992 15:161
    Care to 'splain, Doc?
29.1482This observation has been brought to you by....DKAS::RIVERSGive me a tall ship and a star...Tue Jul 14 1992 19:4333
    
    It's been a couple years and I gotta say sumpthin'.  Save your salvos. 
    This broad has Teflon coating.  :)
    
    
    I find it remarkable how much people complain about the Red Sox.  Oh,
    the angst.  The Suffering.  The Denied Fans.  Even the Hub complained
    how the Red Sox ALWAYS do so awful and he doesn't even like baseball.
    
    
    erf.
    
    
    'cuse if I trod all over some kind of semi-religious ceremony here,
    but really, you folks got nothing to cry about.  Hell, I root for the
    Padres and what have they done?  Nuthin' much.  One World Series that
    set the record for being the Most Boring Four (or was it Five?) Games
    on Earth.  And they didn't even win.  But, as old farts are wont to
    say, We Liked It.  The world didn't end when they promptly collasped
    back to the Familiar Depths in those following years.
    
    Now, I don't have stats programmed to memory, but the Red Sox seem to
    have made the playoffs the last couple years.  And if memory recalls,
    they haven't exactly been gracing the basement forever.  
    
    That's not bad.  So they're wobbling around in mediocrity.  It happens.
    Not everyone can be at the top all the time.  
    
    
    Life really does get worse.  You could be a Padres fan.  =8)
    
    
    kimBO
29.148310 GONGS!CTHQ2::LEARYSix, two, and even.Tue Jul 14 1992 19:4910
    Yabbut kimBO,
    How long have the Friars been in the league? 20 yrs. or so.
    Plus it makes us feel good to angst away.
    And remember: A Excellent_Loss is still a loss.
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
    PS. Want Jack thw Whiffer back??
    
29.1484CAMONE::WAYI'm a crawling king snake, babyTue Jul 14 1992 19:4918
It's not so much that they've been near the top, or even that
they're being mediocre now.

We're talking about a phenomenon that goes back generations, way back
past baseball's Golden Era.   We're talking about tradition, and history,
and the Curse.

It's something you grow up with.  Fathers who are Red Sox fans pass it
on down to their sons and daughters, in fact, the case could be made that
the lore of Red Sox fandom is one of the last great oral traditions
on Earth.


I truly pity the first generation fans after the Red Sox finally win the
series.  They will have missed so much....


'Saw
29.1485COBRA::DINSMORESlash, the 2nd coming of AndelmenTue Jul 14 1992 19:513
    im passing down my yankee heritage to my  daughter
    
    and remeber  marlins in 1992.. 
29.1486COBRA::DINSMORESlash, the 2nd coming of AndelmenTue Jul 14 1992 19:512
    make that 1993.. :)
    
29.1487Hope this gushes enough for my man Bob Hunt 8^)CAMONE::WAYI'm a crawling king snake, babyTue Jul 14 1992 19:5638
Last night, I watched "When It Was A Game II" on HBO.

I sat there quietly, and let the old images of baseball's Golden Era,
and the remarkable words of the players, sportscasters, and writers,
wash over me, filling me with that quiet warmth and satisfaction usually
reserved for autumn afternoons after a nice brisk walk.

There was some awesome footage of Ted "The Splendid Splinter" Williams,
and footage from the Cardinal's ballpark (with the "Star of the Game"
billboard in right field).   

And some striking footage, of The Babe, only a few months from death,
a mere shadow of the great, hulking ballplayer he was in his prime.


If baseball can be considered the lifeblood of America, the common thread
through our generations, the constant in our lives, the "one real thing"
as they said in "City Slickers", than this special program highlights
that, and touches us in special places where we are rarely touched.


For me, it was a wonderful experience.  To actually see players that
my father has talked of, to see them run and jump, catch and throw.....
What an experience.


It is an experience enhanced by the rarity of the footage presented.

Years from now my son will hear me speak of watching Jim Longborg,
or Carl Yaztrzemski, and he will be able to pull up a video.  It won't
be quite the same....



If you get a chance to see it, watch it.


'Saw
29.1488PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 14 1992 20:504
    Dinz, there are child abuse laws in this state...
    
    'Saw, thanks for that pointer on WIWAGII yesterday.  I'da missed it
    otherwise.
29.1489EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Tue Jul 14 1992 20:524
    re .1482
    
    Kim, I grew up rooting for Dave Winfield, Randy Jones, Gene Richards,
    et al ... I didn't think it was so bad ....
29.1490AgreedSHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightTue Jul 14 1992 21:0317
 Way to go, Kimbo.   
 
 As a lifelong card-carrying member of the Phillies Phife and Drum Corps, I
 know exactly what you speak of.   My beloved Phils took 97 years of pure,
 mind-numbing tortured mediocrity before they phinally delivered us to the
 Promised Land.   Sox fans have *nothing* to piss and moan about until they
 go 97 years without The Big One.   Let's see now ... 1992 minus 1918
 equals 74 years ... that's only 23 more years to go.
 
 I will say that the BoSox have choked away more Series than I thought was
 possible.  Perhaps their fans do deserve a little time off for submitting
 themselves to cruel and unusual punishment.
 
 Bob Hunt
 
 P.S.  And yes, Frank, that was one helluva gush there, dude.  No mention
 of the Sumerians though.  Better luck nexted time.
29.1491DKAS::RIVERSGive me a tall ship and a star...Tue Jul 14 1992 21:0419
    re. last
    
    
    Yeah, those guys.  We had Rollie Fingers and Goose and all those other
    guys who seemed to make the Padres one of their last stops before
    retirement.  And We Liked It.  :)
    
    
    My point is, that indeed, it is not all that bad to have a losing team. 
    It's not a bragging point, but not all that bad.  That's why it puzzles
    the hell out of my why Boston area fans seem to go into great fits 'o
    angst over "only" being in first.  (present standing excepted)
    
    
    Cheers,
    
    kimBO
    
    
29.1492PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 14 1992 21:1211
    Part of it is the Anti-Sox fans who love to rub Sox fans' noses in the
    "What have you done since 1918".  Some love to explain it away using
    the theories of Calvinism.  I suppose it would be difficult to
    understand coming from outside the area.  Cubs fans are the only ones
    who come close to understanding.
    
    Bob, it was mentioned in When It Was A Game II that the Sox have always
    been known as one of the first tier teams with the likes of the
    Yankees, and Dodgers.  The Phillies were in the second tier along with
    the likes of the Browns and Athletics.  This might help explain the
    difference in expectations.
29.1493More ...SHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightTue Jul 14 1992 21:4045
29.1494AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhenItWasAGameIII,IV,V-OnlyOnHBOTue Jul 14 1992 22:024
    	Kimbo, being a Red Sox fan is kind of like what Satchmo said
    about jazz, if you have to ask you'll never know.  Lucky for you.
    
    				/Don
29.1495ROYALT::ASHEThe story of Peter PumkinheadWed Jul 15 1992 02:466
    Doc liked 'em probably because he had that Oscar Gamble 'do...
    
    Saw - can you tape that special for me?
    
    -Walt (fan of the lasted AL East team to win the World Series)
    
29.1496FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jul 15 1992 11:3311
    There is a school of Red Sox fans who take great pleasure in being
    tortured every year.  There is also another group that likes to whine
    and complain about the Red Sox always choking and their lives wouldn't
    be complete without it happening.  The Red Sox are also the number 1
    team among the people who write and teach for a living (see:  Giamatti,
    A Bartlett) waxing poetic about Fenway Park and so forth.
    
    In my case, I would like to see lowered expectations before a season
    and a World Series win in my lifetime.
    
    John
29.1497PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 15 1992 12:336
    Bob, When It Was a Game II concentrated on the years 1935-1960ish. 
    People thought free agency would create the haves and the have-nots. 
    They were there long before.  Teams like the Yankees would buy players
    from those other teams so those teams could meet their expenses.  The
    Sox have been known as a "have" since near the turn of the century.  As
    you pointed out, the Phils didn't reach the first tier until the 70s.
29.1498CAMONE::WAYI'm a crawling king snake, babyWed Jul 15 1992 13:0043
Bob,

If you get a chance, check this special out.  More Phillies footage than
in the first one, and the uniforms of "then" are just about like they
are now, in terms of the Phillies logo.


re the Sox:

Yes, there are other teams who have waited for years, like the Phillies,
the Cubs, the White Sox, but around the Red Sox, a whole "lore" has 
been built up.   Yes, the Sox have choked some series away, but in
retrospect, it seems to be the most awful luck, or The Curse.

Perhaps the fact that the Sox have always been "in the hunt", makes the
angst a little more intense.

As they said on WIWAGII, "Hope springs eternal".




on WIWAGII:

Perhaps the most chilling, or spine-tingling segment of the show was the
final seconds, when they read "Game Called".  God it reminded me so much
of that time, maybe a tad more than a month or so after school would start, 
long about the the clocks would change, when you'd put the ball glove
up on the closet shelf, a ball carefully wrapped inside, and you'd stand
the bat up in the corner (behind your one good suit), and you'd bring
out the pigskin.   

The sun would be going down earlier, and your thoughts had changed to
football, you and your buddies suddenly becoming your favorite Giants
players instead of your favorite Red Sox players...

"Game Called"......  stunning, absolutely stunning.


'Saw


PS  Bob, next time I'll work in the Sumarians AND the Hittites...
29.1499A deeper appreciation for the gameNROPST::MPO12::MCFALLA feather in your capWed Jul 15 1992 13:1828
	I only caught the end of the show, but did catch Ruth and
"Game Called". Jack Palance did a heck of a job in reading his portion
of it.

	Seeing this, and reading a book about my favorite team, the Yankees,
called The Yankee Reader, recently, has brought back to my mind the reason
why I wound up liking the team I liked. It was the players. Their attitudes
and habits, and their performances on the field. Listening to west coast
games on the transistor radio when I was supposed to be asleep. Could The
Mick (Mantle) hit another one out? Could that young kid Stottlemyre come
through again? Waking up in the morning and rushing out to get the paper
to read the boxscores and see who did what. I didn't like the Yankees
because they won championships, I liked them because I liked the players
they had on their current team, and I enjoyed hearing about the exploits
of their former players, like Ruth, Gehrig, Dickey, Ruffing, Rolfe, Dimaggio,
Crosetti, Lazzeri, Combs, Pennock, etc. The legends meant something. Only
in the last 10-15 years or so has winning become so important. How could you
like "X" team? They haven't won anything in X years - is a frequent
observation. So what!

	Enjoy your teams, and your teams players. Looking back, it didn't
really matter whether they won or lost, it was that they played the glorious
game of baseball, and provived me with a new adventure to listen to or watch
virtually every day of the summer.

	BTW, 'Saw - you got it wrong. You stopped pretending to be your favorite
YANKEE players, then started pretending to be a New York Football Giant! :^)
29.1500CAMONE::WAYI'm a crawling king snake, babyWed Jul 15 1992 13:3440
>	I only caught the end of the show, but did catch Ruth and
>"Game Called". Jack Palance did a heck of a job in reading his portion
>of it.

Palance has one of those *voices*.  He's great.  I also like Jason 
Robards too.



>like "X" team? They haven't won anything in X years - is a frequent
>observation. So what!

I agree 100%.  Too much emphasis is placed on winning.  Way too much.


		To win the game is great.
		To play the game is greater.
		To love the game is greatest.



>	BTW, 'Saw - you got it wrong. You stopped pretending to be your favorite
>YANKEE players, then started pretending to be a New York Football Giant! :^)

Nope.

You're from Connecticut, you know the drill.  Connecticut is pretty split
between the Yanks and Red Sox.  But for football, there was ONLY one team.

My dad was a Red Sox fan, ergo, I am a Red Sox fan.   But oh, how I remember
the ribbing and razzing that went on between my Dad and his friends when
the Yanks took one, or the Sox took one.

I remember one night when Yaz struck out with men on base to end a Yanks-Sox
game, with the Yanks winning.  I'll never forget how my Dad's friends
ribbed him about that......


'Saw

29.1501Steel waiting for the Sumerians & Hittites stuff, Sawmain... :-)SASE::SZABODances with unemployedWed Jul 15 1992 14:261
    
29.1504EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Wed Jul 15 1992 15:239
    re .1495
    
    At least the Pads knew how to break the Cubs heart ! Ha ! Down 2-0 in a
    best of 5, the Pads smoked the Cubbies three straight in San Diego. And
    there were a lot of Cubs' fans on campus. Suffice to say that it was
    rather morgue-like after that .... :-)
    
    Also the Pads had some of the coolest uniforms until they went deep
    into pinstripe madness ...
29.1505maybe a uniform topic discussion?ROYALT::ASHESometimes I rhyme slow...Wed Jul 15 1992 16:413
    Brown and Gold were always my favorite colors... Up there with the
    Grand Rapids Hoops of the CBA, in their Purple, Orange and Green...
    and of course, the Michigan Panthers...
29.1506At least the brown was originalSALES::THILLWed Jul 15 1992 18:3911
    Rathole alert!
    
    The Padres looked like giant tacos back then! I think they also had
    some orange or red (tomatoes) to go with the brown (meat) and gold
    (shell). All they needed was a touch of light green for the lettuce
    effect.
    
    Why did the Pads change to from borwn to the boring navy blue that
    about 2/3 of all teams wear?
    
    Tom
29.1507EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Wed Jul 15 1992 20:494
    Like I said Tom ... it was the packherd mentality that too many teams
    have. 
    
    I liked the home jerseys of the early 80's ...
29.1508AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhenItWasAGameItWasStillABusinessThu Jul 16 1992 16:468
    	Craig Mustard has been filling in for Anvilhaid this week and
    yesterday's show was about Barry Bonds and Kirby Puckett not wanting
    to come to Boston.  One guy called up and said that Bonds was probably
    to black for Boston.  Most callers were trashing on Kriby for what
    he said, but if I was a black superstar, and saw what happened to
    Rice, I would be hesitant to come here too.
    
    				/Don
29.1509GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPersonal Computer GroupThu Jul 16 1992 16:575
    I'll beat Mac to the punch.
    
    What happened to Rice?
    
    Mark.
29.1510COBRA::DINSMORESlash, the 2nd coming of AndelmenThu Jul 16 1992 17:062
    marcus,
    its probaly that number 6-4-3
29.1511SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 16 1992 17:154
    > what happened to Rice
       His eyes went bad?
       He couldn't catch the ball?
                                   Denny
29.1512SASE::SZABODances with unemployedThu Jul 16 1992 18:056
    > what happened to Rice?
    
    Got steamed?  In a minute?
    
    Hawk
    
29.1513MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 16 1992 18:073
    
     Add Tim Raines' name to the long list of black players who do not
    want to play in Boston for the Red Sox.
29.1514Another mythGIAMEM::LEFEBVREPersonal Computer GroupThu Jul 16 1992 18:337
    Tim Raines' name is NOT added to the long list.
    
    Tim Raines was interviewed on WEEI earlier this season by Dale Arnold
    and indicated that this was not true.  I heard him say he'd love to
    play in Boston if the right opportunity emerged.  
    
    Mark.
29.1515FDCV06::KINGThu Jul 16 1992 19:004
    Yeah Marky... If the red sox moved!!!!
    
    
    REK
29.1516I miss the Pads in brownCTHQ2::MCCULLOUGHComing soon: Lindsey's Sister!!Thu Jul 16 1992 19:3315
RE: Pads, a few back

The unis changed lasted year.  Many of the faithful were saddened by the move, 
not only in that they lost their uniqueness, but in that the brown was true
to the padre theme, since it indeed matched the color of the robes worn by the 
dudes who worked in the missions found in the area.

RE: Sox and blacks

The problem is real, and I think it is not so much with the fans, but with the 
team.  They are making strides, however, and a big one was the hiring of Frank 
White to be groomed as a manager in the system.  They have a long way to go, 
however.

=Bob=
29.1517ROYALT::ASHESometimes I rhyme slow...Thu Jul 16 1992 21:544
    re Rice:
    If you put up numbers like that, would you want your "Day" shared with
    Bob Stanley?
    
29.1518Rice is working for the club, fercryinoutloud...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 16 1992 22:0214
    
    > If you put up numbers like that, would you want your "Day" shared with
    > Bob Stanley?
    
    Rice has a standing invitation to have his "day", by his lonesome, 
    whenever he wants it.  The thing with Stanley was just a quickie 
    acknowledgement right after both players refused to retire with any 
    grace so it had to be done for them, and has been blown so far out 
    of proportion as to be unrecognizable.  Yaz had his "day" after he 
    was elected to the HOF (1990), and Ted Williams had his just last 
    year!
    
    glenn
    
29.1519LUNER::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Fri Jul 17 1992 16:0517
    I was listing to WRKO yesterday afternoon .... forget the Sox coming to
    their senses anytime soon. Joe Castiglone was spouting the usual
    right-wing crap ...
    
    I knew the Sox were in trouble when Joe Carter passed up Boston because
    of race. And he LOVES Fenway ...
    
    The Sox will only improve their status by drafting and signing more than the
    occasional Mo Vaughn or Ellis Burks. Then getting them to the majors.
    
    It would also help if they signed more than the occasional Herm
    Winngham. For example Bonds AND a decent player with maybe a little
    speed ?
    
    At least it's a good thing Hobson's the manager. If he really wants to
    play ButchBall, he'll need to get a different type of ballplayer in
    here.
29.1520AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhenItWasAGameItWasStillABusinessFri Jul 17 1992 16:0728
	Rice's problem was a combination of media and club.  MrT's cousin 
Dan Shagnasty tried to make it look like Rice was trying to collect 
unemployment after he retired when it was something he had to do because of 
his injury.  Larry Bird and Jim Rice were basically the same early in 
their careers, but the media cut Bird a whole lot of slack, while comming down 
real hard on Rice.  Certain members of the Boston press tried to portray 
George Scott as some kind of fat, chicken eating moron when in fact George 
was a helluva glove, a very good power hitter and certainly not stupid.  
Truth is Scott managed an unaffiliated minor league team to a championship 4 or 
5 years ago, but nobody even offered him a minor league job.  The club never 
backed it's black athletes like say Dick MacPherson did with Fryar when 
he fumbled a punt in the Patriot's first home game of the season.  In my 
opinion that helped turn things around for Fryar, because he knew that no 
matter what the media said about him the club (i.e. MacPherson) stood 
behind him.  The Red Sox basically let their guys swing in the breeze when 
the media starts taking potshots.

	You have to wonder why a guy like Lee Smith, was never considered a 
"problem" in Chicago or later St. Louis, but was portrayed as one in Boston.
Ditto for Reggie Smith, only what he went through in Boston was real bad.  
So if you're Kirby Puckett you probably will not entertain any offers from 
the Red Sox, and that certainly doesn't make him a bad guy.  You have to 
believe that the players talk, and if all the stuff said about the Red Sox 
and black athletes were absolutely false that fact would be communicated to 
the players through the grapvine.  If the Red Sox ever want to bid for the 
services of black superstars, then they certainly have some work to do.

				/Don
29.1521PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 17 1992 16:3625
29.1522NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 17 1992 17:2314
    Basically the same discussion has been raging on the last few days in 
    the RED_SOX conference.  I don't care what he's had to say about 
    Boston, I still want Barry Bonds!  If the Red Sox keep trying and give
    it the effort (and most of their high draft picks the past 3-4 years
    *have* been minorities-- Vaughn, Frankie Rodriguez, Steve Rodriguez,
    Jeff McNeely, J.J. Johnson, Boo Moore), there can and will be change.
    
    Doc, Joe Castiglione is the Red Sox play-by-play man and is about as
    non-controversial as they come.  If you're going to smear someone
    without explanation, you might as well get the right person...
    
    glenn
    
29.1523OK ... how 'bout "parrot" ?EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Fri Jul 17 1992 18:0115
    Hey Glenn, I'm fairly certain that was the guy I heard yesterday
    saying,
    
    "Minorities cry racism every time ...."
    
    (He used Oil Can as an example. Never mind that he did get harrassed
    here, and never mind that even if he was a jerk, it doesn't explain Lee
    or Reggie Smith, or Scott.)
    
    "The Sox get players based on ability alone ..."
    
    Maybe right-wing was the wrong phrase, but "party line", and Pollyanna
    seem to fit ...
    
    Doc
29.1524ROYALT::ASHEJerry Lewis: Giving hope to carry onFri Jul 17 1992 18:342
    You sure this was RKO and not EEI?  What time was it?
    
29.1525SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Jul 17 1992 18:473
    Walt, if it was Jeo C. talking it was probably'RKO. That's the station
    the games are on.
                                  Denny
29.1526What would it take?NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 17 1992 19:0134
              
    No Doc, the guy you're referring to is Boston Herald sportswriter Joe
    Guilliotti, not Red Sox play-by-play man Joe Castiglione (a major
    difference, as one is affiliated with the ballclub and the other is
    not; the association with the club being your point).  I heard the 
    entire show, including the pre-game where the WRKO call-in host 
    questioned Lou Gorman on the subject, and no one but a caller came 
    remotely close to saying "minorities cry racism every time".  It was an
    even-handed discussion of the problem, not a race-baiting session.  
    Agree or disagree, Guilliotti was of the opinion that while the perception 
    problem is a reality amongst MLB baseball players, it is still only a 
    perception, as from his experience he knew of no black ballplayers who 
    were especially mistreated in Boston.  He claimed most liked Boston, 
    and that yes, Oil Can Boyd complained, but that he also said the same 
    things when Montreal released him (which he did).
    
    I've admittedly grown tired of the Red Sox-bashing because while
    they've had a very checkered history, I think they've made a lot of
    progress in the last 10 years, including through the draft, in the
    organizational coaching ranks (two minority minor-league managers), 
    in the front office (assistant GM), and in the tens of thousands of 
    dollars ownership (basically Jean Yawkey) has put back into the 
    community in the form of inner-city sports programs.  Do we ever hear 
    about any of these positives?  No, the Red Sox are still held to a 
    different standard because of their past.  
    
    Already this year Barry Bonds has had similar criticisms of the 
    Pirates, and Gary Sheffield has had something bad to say about 
    Milwaukee just about every other week.  Are there any exceptions,
    anywhere?  Can you ever correct problems and put history behind you?  
    
    glenn
    
    
29.1527ROYALT::ASHEJerry Lewis: Giving hope to carry onFri Jul 17 1992 19:182
    I asked because Jimmy Myers had callers talking about it yesterday.
    Guillioti makes sense...
29.1528EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Fri Jul 17 1992 19:4819
    Glenn, things can change, but let's face it, it only takes a Dee Brown
    or Roberto Kelly to undo any good works that the Sox have done. And
    when this stuff happens every couple of years (Boyd in Chelsea in 88 ?,
    Brown in 90, Kelly in 91, Tommy Harper for good measure), it's hard to
    build that momentum.
    
    I personally haven't had any problems when I've been in Fenway (may be
    my game face and dark sunglasses), but many black people still won't
    go, for they percive it to be a bad place to go. Moreover, Boston's
    black athletes - be it perception or reality - have a rep of not caring
    a whole hell of a lot about the black community - or wanting to be
    around it (Reggie Lewis being one *very* admirable exception to this),
    hence Jim Rice didn't exactly warm the hearts of many black fans around
    Boston either. When people can seize on a hero (the way fans do
    Meuthen's Jeff Reardon), it helps to keep the stands packed.
    
    JMP (P is for perspective.),
    
    Doc
29.1529PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 17 1992 19:521
    Kelly in '91?
29.1530CTHQ2::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Fri Jul 17 1992 19:5314
    Doc,
    I don't even know of many white players that care to get involved
    in the community either, excepting for the usual appearances which
    half of them look real pleased to be participating.  Now isn't Vaughn
    supposedly getting involved more in the black community since
    he's been around? And I hear Pena is quite involved in the Hispanic
    community.
    
    And from what I've heard and perceived, and I might be wrong, the
    Patriots players of all ethnicities seem to get involved more in the
    community.
    
    MikeL
    
29.1531SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Jul 17 1992 19:582
       John Stephens of the Pats does/did a lot of work with kids in Roxbury.
                                  Denny
29.1532PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jul 17 1992 19:589
    All of the Sox charitable work seems to be very low key, except for the
    Jimmy Fund.  Since Mrs. Yawkey passed away we've learned of more and
    more things the Yawkey family and the Sox have done for charity.
    
    Part of this may be that not many of the Sox players live in the area
    in the off season, so it's not big news in the Boston area if these
    players are doing big things in their hometown (Clemens and Greenwell
    spring to mind).  Part of it is they choose to keep it lowkey (the
    Yawkeys especially so).
29.1533NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 17 1992 20:4619
       
    > Kelly in '91?
      
    I think this in reference to Mel Hall being detained at Logan by
    airport security.  Again, what I didn't and still don't understand is
    what this had to do with the Red Sox, or even Boston.  Those guys are 
    federal employees, have no association with the city of Boston, and 
    work under very strict guidelines.  Why would something like a black
    man being detained in an airport be specific to Boston?  Joe Morgan
    (the HOF ballplayer, not the Sox' sleepy ex-manager) sued the gov't 
    for being pinned to the ground and held for several minutes at gunpoint
    by DEA agents and airport cops in LA, and won.  There's obviously a 
    race-associated implication of guilt held by a lot of people in this
    world, and it's going on everywhere, including but not exclusively
    in Boston (there was *no* excuse for the Dee Brown incident,
    unquestionably...)
    
    glenn
     
29.1534CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 12:326
Geez, no comment on 'the greatest pitcher in the history of the game's" latest
little temper tantrum?   

This place is slipping...

JD
29.1535SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jul 20 1992 12:493
       I woulda done the same thing. Sounds like Kimball didn't research
    his story.
                                    Denny
29.1536CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 12:5511
Denny -

Even if true, I've always felt in matters like that, its better to do it
mano-to-mano, and not for the benefit of lots of folks - sounded like it
was a planned reaction by Roger, and not spontaneous - from the outburst to
the apology to the rest of the reporters.   

Hey at least the greatest pitcher of all time finally won his 10th, which
ensures him of the Cy Young award again.

JD
29.1537PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 12:591
    Hw about that 2 hitter against the hottest team in baseball!
29.1538SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jul 20 1992 13:109
       So JD, why aren't you criticizing the writer for not going to Roger
    for his side of the story before he exposed it to a million people?
    Roger doesn't have a column to write a response in, so I see nothing
    wrong with going public. 
       BTW, Kimball was on vacation for 3 weeks so this was Roger's first
    oppurtunity.
       What would your feelings be if the story was written about Doc
    Gooden or Nolan?
                                     Denny 
29.1539PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 13:1610
    Can you imagine the outcry if Clemens did something a couple of weeks
    ago?  The Clemens bashers would be out in force claiming that Clemens
    was taking out the frustations of his winless streak on an innocent
    bystander.
    
    The reporter wrote about an incident that occurred 2 years ago.  He
    didn't even have his facts straight.  Another writer came to Clemens
    defense in a recently published article citing his charity work and
    willingness to sign autographs long after other players would have gone
    home.
29.1540CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 13:2112
Denny -

Gooden?  Ryan?  WQhy would I defend either.  

I got what I wanted.  Mac replied in exactly the way I knew he would.  I'm
glad predictability is still there.

Denny, the writer should  have - but he didn't.  So by doing the outburst thing,
Ol Rockethaid merely lowers hisself to that level.  but I guess when you
are the greatest of all time, you don't worry about that...

JD
29.1541Herald = WWN (-:SHARE::DERRYMon Jul 20 1992 13:2915
    I thought Roger asked that all the camera people, etc. leave but ESPN
    radio had someone in there to get all the gossip... I could be wrong.
    
    While Roger has pulled some stoopidhaid moves, I don't consider this
    one of them.  The "incident" happened two years ago and the grandmother
    decides, recently, to send Kimball a letter.  Did she say, "please sign
    this for my dying grandson," or "would you sign this for me?"  I don't
    know for sure but if I'm Joe Big Jock and I've been signing my name on
    everything for 15, 30, 60 minutes whatever, I'm gonna want to stop
    sometime.  You can't please everyone.  Kimball was a schmoe to write
    about this and not just because it was about Clemens.  It could have
    been about Phil Plantier, Rick Fox or Billy Andrade, I'd still say
    Kimball was wrong.
    
    
29.1542SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jul 20 1992 13:4113
       MAc answered the exact way he should answer. Clemens did nothing
    wrong. What is really predictable is you JD. And what's with the
    'greatest pitcher of all time' nonsense. Who in here calls him that?
    MAybe in the Red Sox conference, but that's not where we are. IF you've
    got a personal problem with Clemens, fine. But why keep trying to "/"
    in here? 
       EVERY writer on Sportsbeat last night said Kimball was wrong, and 2
    of them write for the same paper as he does. One (Callahan) is the guy
    who said Roger has a $5 million dollar arm and a $5 brain. So these
    weren't guys who love Clemens. The other 2 were Dan Shaughnessy and
    Steve Bulpett, who also have written loads a negative stuff in the
    past.
                                     Denny
29.1543PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 13:543
29.1544PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 13:575
29.1545PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 13:597
29.1546CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 14:0016
No Mac, I knew you'd get on your valient white charger, and race to the defense
of poor Roger (or any other Boston player).   

Denny.  Now of course, have I said Kimball was right?  No, I didn't.  So you
merely knee-jerked.   Remember, Roger is the public figure, and sorry, he's
in the limelight.   He can chose to handle these things professionally, or like
a spoiled moron.  He usually chooses the latter, unfortunately.   

As I said, IMO, he stooped to Kimball's level (which should have been obvious as
a dig to the professional standing of Kimball in my eyes...)

Geez, I keep seeing this line "There is no crying in baseball"  Don't know
where it comes from - but its the biggest lie ever.  All there is is
crying in baseball - from spoiled millionaires.

JD
29.1547PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 14:122
    Ah yes, JD is at it again.  His old Quixotic quest to try and tear down
    the superstars of the game.
29.1548JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasMon Jul 20 1992 14:137
    > Geez, I keep seeing this line "There is no crying in baseball"  Don't
    > know where it comes from
    
    The movie "A League of Their Own"
    
    
    py
29.1549Roger was choked up and said what he felt, and I loved it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jul 20 1992 14:1838
    JD, you going touchy-feely-soft on us?  A guy's to be criticized for
    defending himself?  You're starting to sound like these spineless
    journalists who play up the absence of emotion in the highly-paid 
    athlete, and then crap all over him when he delivers, even when HE'S 
    ABSOLUTELY IN THE RIGHT.  They're all millionaires, they're all 
    pampered and spolied, they don't show us that they care, and when they 
    do we're going to write that they're millionaires who should just
    shut up and take it anyways...  
    
    From listening to all the fall-out, including on yesterday's postgame
    "Sportsbeat" program which regularly features some of the biggest
    yahoos in the sports media business, I'd have to say that I'm 
    pleasantly surprised by the Boston sportswriters' reaction to the 
    Clemens incident.  To a man, I haven't heard anyone yet say that they 
    blame Clemens for what he did (although this Steve Bulpett character 
    did go out of his way to obfuscate around the issue of what limits
    that sorry paper he writes for and its editor will stretch the truth 
    to in the name of "journalism"). 
    
    Not only did these reporters state for the record that the article was 
    unfair and that Clemens does more in the community than most Boston
    athletes, Gerry Callahan also claimed that this woman's particular 
    story was full of holes to boot, and without even considering the lack
    of context provided by the piece it was an example of very poor
    verification work.  It's apparent to me, at least, that this was 
    nothing more than another in a long line of attempts by a Boston sports
    "journalist" to make a name for himself by trying to run another great,
    marginally unpopular athlete out of town.
    
    Kimball says Clemens was grandstanding.  Great!  I wish more athletes
    would do so.  Without consulting Kimball, Clemens embarrassed him in
    front of a couple dozen of his peers.  Without consulting Clemens,
    Kimball created a piece of fiction and embarrassed Clemens in front of
    a half a million people.  I'd seek retribution, too...
    
    glenn
     
29.1550as strong as the Dinz KOD...CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentMon Jul 20 1992 14:257
 My buddy Roger ought to pay me to bad mouth. Everytime I do he pitches
 a masterpiece....And the buns hahahahahaaaaaa

 Kimball's an idiot. He's one those guys who thinks his SLOF doesn't stink..
 
 mike 
29.1551I like Roger's way better (the buns will immortalze this!)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jul 20 1992 14:3116
    
> He can chose to handle these things professionally, or like
> a spoiled moron.  He usually chooses the latter, unfortunately.   
  
    By the way, what would be the "professional" way to handle something
    like this?  To take the writer aside and say that this was a bad, bad
    thing that he did and that you don't ever want it to happen again,
    and then to shake hands with no hard feelings?  Seems to me that the
    logical "professional" thing to do when one's character has been
    wrongly smeared in public would be to file a lawsuit.  I can only
    imagine the public reaction to that, coming from a "spoiled millionaire" 
    and all...
    
    glenn
    
    
29.1552CNTROL::CHILDSwhy does Led Zep bore these days?Mon Jul 20 1992 14:357
 the most important part of the story's missing though, without an ump's
 help were all the buns, strikes????
    
    
mike

29.1553HBPCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Mon Jul 20 1992 14:361
    
29.1554CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 14:3616
Actually Glenn - I'd have cheered Roger if he did put a lawsuit forth.  There's
no place for crap like Kimball's piece.  But ol macho Roger had to live up
to his billing - and blow up in the lockerroom.  He, IMO, played right into
a jerk like Kimball's hand.  Ol Roger is almost as predictable as Mac.

Speaking of Mac - where did I tear down the greats of the game?  Where did I
address Roger's ability as a pitcher?  Where, ol mighty Mac?  Where?  Now c'mon,
you should be better at this - it is a sport played with a little round ball.

IMO, Roger did the predictable thing - and IMO, it was a planned reaction.  And
IMO, he would have been better really going for the juglar.

In your zeal to prove I'm on some sort of quest, you've stumbled over yer
legs, yet again, ol Mac.

JD
29.1555CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 14:398
And I didn't even mention throwing hamburger buns.  C'mon, isn't that just
a little juvenile?  Don't know about you, but when I was about 5, if I did
such a thing, I'd a been sent packing to my room.

Ol Roger really does seem to have a little bit of simpleton rolling around
in his haid, don't he...

JD
29.1556;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jul 20 1992 14:4613
    
> Ol Roger really does seem to have a little bit of simpleton rolling around
> in his haid, don't he...
    
    I'm surprised that you'd stoop to the level of the average sportswriter
    in demeaning the intelligence of one of the very best at what he does, a
    task (pitching) that by the all accounts demands intense thought and
    concentration, regardless of talent level.  Why should this 
    "unprofessional" commentary, much like the "Magic don't talk too good, 
    do he?" criticisms of the past, be dignified with a response?
    
    glenn
    
29.1557CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 14:5012
Glenn,

You lost me there.   I haven't questioned his pitching, or the intense 
concentration it takes to do it.

However, it does seem painfully clear that Roger has problems in certain
settings, and unlike a Larry  Bird, for example, he hasn't seemed to 'get it'
as his career has moved on.

Making fun of a Magic Johnson for his speech?  What the hail are you talking
about?  You better check your valient charger Glenn, it may be a burro.  ;-))
JD
29.1558MCIS2::DHAMELMon Jul 20 1992 14:566
    
    The situation would have been far funnier had there been pies handy
    instead of hamburger buns.  N'yuk-n'yuk.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1559PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 15:087
29.1560Not too many things more humiliating than being told you're dumb...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jul 20 1992 15:3123
                                            
> However, it does seem painfully clear that Roger has problems in certain
> settings, and unlike a Larry Bird, for example, he hasn't seemed to 'get it'
> as his career has moved on.
    
    My point is: so what, and why is this fact worthy of comment?  Why is
    an athlete's intelligence or demeanor worthy of public scrutiny (and
    yes, I did read that stuff about Magic in here; I didn't say you wrote it),
    so long as he stays on the right side of the law, like any other citizen?
    Time and time again I see and hear Clemens' supposed lack of intelligence
    (off the field, not on) belittled by condescending, self-righteous
    sportswriters (which translates to the same from brainwashed fans), and 
    my response is always the same: what does that say for the smartass who 
    makes a living writing about such trivia?  Can you imagine being 
    required to deal with people every day who've openly and publicly 
    ridiculed your intelligence in the past, and not only being asked not to 
    respond to it but to *accomodate* it, with pleasant interviews and other 
    requests (yeah, yeah, I know, "for x million dollars it should be a 
    privilege to be humiliated like that")?
    
    glenn
    
     
29.1561:^)GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPersonal Computer GroupMon Jul 20 1992 16:083
    Will the last one out of the building please re-boot JD?
    
    Mark.
29.1562USCTR1::NAHEARNMon Jul 20 1992 16:2914
    JD,
    
    Your comments regarding predictability (sp?) come across as very
    insultory!!!  Clemens predictable....[INSULT]    Mac
    predictable....[INSULT]     If being predictable is so damn bad, then
    you might want to look in the nearest mirror!!!!  You won't like what
    you see!!!!    Personally speaking, I tire less from reading
    predictable optimism (sp?) than predictable pessimism!!!
    
    
    Don't care if this helps,
    
    
    Nelly
29.1563CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 16:4012
Mac -

As I've stated before, my diatribes, as you call them, are always in response
to the over exuberance of certain noters to those players you named - I'll
try to aim lower so it doesn't zoom over your haid (FWIW:  M.Air Brooks - Jordan,
Lemiux, Charlie Partee, and Schramm; Bird - all Celts fans)

Nelly -

Who care what you think.  I certainly don't.

JD
29.1564COBRA::BRYDIEThe last gang in townMon Jul 20 1992 16:467
    
     What are insults and personal attacks doing here in our friendly
    little 'Electronic Tavern' ? Some folks would do well to remember
    we're talking sports here. That's all just sports. We ain't settling
    the balance of power in the Middle East or ending world hunger so
    lighten up a little.
    
29.1565SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jul 20 1992 16:497
> As I've stated before, my diatribes, as you call them, are always in response
> to the over exuberance of certain noters to those players you named - I'll
    
     Response eh? Care to tell us who brought up the Clemens matter this
    AM? You admitted the only reason you mentioned it was to get a
    'predictable' response from Mac.
                                         Denny
29.1566CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 16:546
Denny -

Someone has to keep this place from becoming a boring lovefest, now don't 
someone?

JD
29.1567PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 16:549
    So, JD, what is the point then of bringing up only a portion of a
    story?  A portion that reflects badly on a local sportsperson?  Just
    looking to harrass (oops, sorry, bring in line) his fans?
    
    Of course some defense would be brought up in this case.  The defense
    has already been brought up in the media.  It is inevitable that a
    defense would be brought against claims that were half-baked to begin
    with and by a reporter who made no attempt to get verification,
    nevermind the other side of the story.
29.1568PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 16:565
29.1569CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 16:5814
Going back over these notes, I'll remind folks that I started off asking a
question.  The nexted replies were directed at me.  I replied in same.

The only insults, if taken that way, were against Roger Clemens, and not
fellow noters.  If I was thin-skinned, I could make the charge that Mac's
obvious quest against me was insulting and attacking - but I don't care what
he thinks anyway.  

So, what's folks problems?  I made a comment about Roger, directed to no one,
and got personal replies back?

Perhaps some folks (Nelly) need to read before reacting.

JD
29.1570SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jul 20 1992 16:585
    JD,
       I have no problem with "/", as long as you admit that's what you're
    doing. But don't get all self-righteous and tell us your just
    'responding' to over-adoring fans.
                                      Denny
29.1571SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jul 20 1992 17:0211
> Geez, no comment on 'the greatest pitcher in the history of the game's" latest
>little temper tantrum?   
>
> This place is slipping...
>
< JD
    
       Yeah, real innocent question there JD! You didn't even mention
    Clemens' name. And you didn't axe a question, you told us it was a
    'tantrum'.
                                       Denny
29.1572CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 17:0411
Mac -

again.  Did I ever, ever, ever say that Kimball was right?  No.  You've missed
it completely.  All I said was Roger, IMO didn't handle it right, and IMO,
stooped to the level of  Kimball.  Obviously, you and others have a hard
time understanding that.  

Regarding the conference rep - hey, with endless notes about everything from
abortion, sex, baldness, etc. - at least I'm addressing a sports issue.  

JD
29.1573CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 17:0711
Denny 

But, in the cases of Jordan, Bird and Lemiuex, I was responding to fans (and
I even named them).   With utter amazement, and a few chuckles, I was dumbfounded
at the amount of people who bit - especially when, in the case of Jordan, I
was so obviously blatant about who I was addressing my reply to (in fact,
I usually named him!) - but still, folks only saw what they wanted, and
started in I was anti-Jordan.  I simply rode with it.  As I did Bird and
Mario.

jD
29.1574CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 20 1992 17:086
Denny -

Hey, if I never named him - then how did folks know who I was talking about?
He
must be the greatest ever - that proves it!  [isfh]

JD
29.1575LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Jul 20 1992 17:085
    
    Hey guys, lay off JD.  Can't you understand his pname?  It says "I wish
    to bore whoever I chosse."  He's just chosen this notes file.
    
    Brews 
29.1576M Air Brooks, Charlie Partee, all Celts' fans... love it! ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jul 20 1992 17:0910
    
    Aw, lay off JD.  He's only serving to underline the fact that Clemens
    is the greatest pitcher in the game today, and unless you were a
    Dodgers' fan when Koufax was pitching, or a Cardinals' fan with Gibson,
    or a Mets' fan with Seaver, you haven't seen anyone better in the last
    30 years.  Otherwise, he wouldn't be receiving so much attention.
    
    Signed,
    Roger's most adoring, over-exuberant fan...
     
29.1577PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Jul 20 1992 19:496
29.1578Kimball's article was a non sequitorLUNER::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Mon Jul 20 1992 20:3810
    re .1536
    
    JD, I'd have lost it as well. Maybe it wasn't spontaneous, but
    Kimball's article wasn't either. I'm no worshipper of Clemens, but that
    'article' was a hatchet job of the lowest order, and he wasn't even
    competent enough to be subtle about it.
    
    Good for Clemens.
    
    Doc
29.1579FDCV06::KINGTue Jul 21 1992 12:583
    JD.. GREAT spin control....
    
    REK
29.1580Learning a lesson from Rice?PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 21 1992 13:234
    Wade Boggs says that one of the reasons for his subpar performance this
    year is that he's not picking up the ball well out of the pitcher's
    hand.  He was fitted for glasses last week.  He hasn't worn them yet
    but went 0-fer last night, so it just might be a matter of time.
29.1581Call me skeptical, he was 3 fer on SundayCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Jul 21 1992 13:261
    
29.1582USCTR1::NAHEARNTue Jul 21 1992 13:291
    correction...........he was 4-fer on Sunday!!
29.1583MONGUS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townTue Jul 21 1992 13:469
     
      First it was the contract negotiations that were at the root
     of his hitting woes. Now, it's his vision. What's he going to 
     blame it on if he gets glasses and he still isn't hitting ? Cer-
     tainly not his deteriorating skills. No, he'll probably blame
     it on the world wide turmoil and his concerns for his fellow
     man.
    
29.1584CNTROL::CHILDSwhy does Led Zep bore these days?Tue Jul 21 1992 14:007
 Anybody else know someone who's 20-20 and needs glasses? I don't. I thought
 20-20 was just right. Boggs was reported to be 20-15 a few years ago. Doesn't
 seem to me that going from better than perfect to perfect vision would effect
 anybody Wade.....

 Next thing you know he'll be Oprah pinning for Margo....
29.1585SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Jul 21 1992 14:093
       I think it's the stoopid sunglasses he was wearing at the beginning
    of the year!
                                 Denny
29.1586MCIS2::DHAMELTue Jul 21 1992 14:176
    
    Since he gave up his extramarital affairs something seems to be causing
    him to go blind.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1587CTHQ4::MCCULLOUGHComing soon: Lindsey's Sister!!Tue Jul 21 1992 14:217
re 
.1586 - rooollllward Dickstah

Actually, I've worn glasses/contact lenses for, oh, 20 years, and always 
thought that your vision cannot be corrected to be better than 20-20.  Something
about your cornea adjusting.  Maybe these glasses are a palcebo for Boggs.

=Bob=
29.1588NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 21 1992 14:3815
    
    20-20 is *not* perfect vision.  It only means something about being
    able to read 20-point letters at 20 feet, or something like that.  For 
    a normal person, if you have 20-20 vision, the doctor's not going to 
    bother to give you a prescription, but 20-20 is not even good vision, 
    really.  Most corrected vision is better than that.
    
    Hey, it's still an excuse, but you can't knock Wade for inconsistency.
    Wade was telling tall stories and using the same silly superstitions back
    when he was hitting .365.  Like with Rickey Henderson, Boggs just does
    not fit that prototypical profile of an athlete.  He dances to a
    different drummer, no question about it...
    
    glenn
    
29.1589He has incident to prove it!CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Jul 21 1992 14:476
    Well if he was wearing glasses a few years ago, he wouldn't fallen
    out of his wife's truck.  Wif glasses, he woulda grabbed the seat belt
    rather than the door handle.
    
    I truly believe him ( right)
    
29.1590Yellow journalism at its worst...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 21 1992 14:5820
    I got a chance to hear "the lowlife" himself on the radio last evening
    and he actually had the gall to claim that he only decided to air the
    woman's story in the first place because it contradicted Clemens'
    previously stated "autograph policy", and that under close examination
    he really never came out and wrote that Clemens knowingly denied an 
    autograph to a sick child.  Yeah, right.  I don't know about you guys, 
    but I lie awake at nights worrying about the ongoing saga of the 
    ballplayers' ever-changing autograph policies.  Maybe even enough to 
    buy the Herald.  They're providing a public service, almost.
    
    It's amazing how far some of these "journalists" and their "editor" will 
    bend the truth and still expect a gullible public to buy into it.  
    Sickening, really, considering how even after being cold-busted by their 
    peers they continue to try to turn the tables by presenting a totally
    irrelevant defense like Clemens didn't even read the article, or was too
    stupid to understand what it meant, etc...
    
    glenn
    
29.1591COBRA::BRYDIEThe last gang in townTue Jul 21 1992 15:0021
    
  >>  Hey, it's still an excuse, but you can't knock Wade for inconsistency.
  
      Again, first he blamed his problems on management now it's his vision.
      If'n that ain't inconsistent...

  >>  Wade was telling tall stories and using the same silly superstitions 
  >>  back when he was hitting .365.  

      There's a rather large difference between superstitions and flat out
      lame excuses. His numbers have been dropping steadily for a few years
      now - a rather tough thing to take for a numbers hanger.

  >>  Like with Rickey Henderson, Boggs just does not fit that prototypical 
  >>  profile of an athlete.  He dances to a different drummer, no question 
  >>  about it...
    
      Can't ever remember hearing Rickey make these kinds of pathetic excuses
      or ever seeing Boggs carry a team. The only thing these two have in com-
      mon are humongous egos and only one of them is justified.    
    
29.1592PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 21 1992 15:2226
29.1593NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 21 1992 15:2619
    
    Well, I disagree, Tommy; while I don't think that Boggs is quite the 
    player that Henderson is, he had a career .345 BA/.435 OBP going into 
    this season, his numbers had only "steadily dropped" to .332 BA/.421 
    OBP as of just last season, and he will be going to the Hall of Fame 
    someday, you can count on it.
    
    Yes, the excuses are lame, absolutely.  You don't have to like Wade
    Boggs, nobody does, but the ego analogy to Henderson is there.  Just 
    last spring Rickey Henderson was directly quoted that he couldn't 
    perform with the thought of being underpaid in his head, as had 
    happened in his last year with the Yankees (his words, not mine).  He
    then proceeded to have an "off" year by his standards, and looks to be
    following that up this year.  His statement, with an underlying threat
    implied, was almost *exactly* the same as the one that you criticized
    Boggs for earlier. 

    glenn
    
29.1594MCIS2::DHAMELTue Jul 21 1992 15:476
    
    What Wade's vision problems really boil down to is "I can't see playing
    for the Red Sox next year."
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1595COBRA::BRYDIEThe last gang in townTue Jul 21 1992 15:5018
    
>>  The "I have trouble concentrating because of a contract dispute" excuse
>>  has been around a long time.  Why when Rice was allegedly having vision
>>  problems did it seem a plausible excuse, but with Wade it's lame?
  
    Did I ever say it was a plausible excuse for Rice ? It might have been
    a plausible excuse for Boggs if it had been the first excuse but it just
    the latest in what is sure to be a long line of 'em.

>>  "Carry a team" is one of those touchy-feely expressions that never
>>  seems to have a well thought out definition, especially in baseball. 
>>  Kind of like "big game" and "clutch hitter".

    For a more thorough explanation of "Carrying a team" see Yastremski, Carl
    circa 1967.  It's not surprising though Macadoo that being a Boggs defender
    you not familiar with the phrases 'big game', 'clutch hitter' and 'carrying 
    a team'.
    
29.1596PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 21 1992 15:5831
29.1597GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPersonal Computer GroupTue Jul 21 1992 16:486
    Glenn, I heard Kimball on the radio last night as well, and
    wholeheartedly agree.  To Gerry Callahan's credit, he also publicly
    trashed Kimball for the article and they share adjacent offices at the
    Herald.
    
    Mark.
29.1598XCELR8::DHAMELWed Jul 22 1992 12:426
    
    You know it's a bad season when you switch to "Circus of the Stars" for
    its superior athleticism and entertainment value.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1599AXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Wed Jul 22 1992 12:465
And I guess you could describe Mo Vaughn's defensive exhibition lasted 
night as "A Little Shop of Horrors"

Chap    

29.1600real baseballCNTROL::CHILDSCard Carrying LibertarianWed Jul 22 1992 12:563
 You should have watched the Braves, Dickstah....

29.1601XCELR8::DHAMELWed Jul 22 1992 13:5121
    
    True story.
    
    Casey's Uncle Bert died last weekend, a long-time die-hard Red Sox fan.
    He was, in fact, buried with a Red Sox cap, although he wasn't actually
    wearing it.  Aunt Edie (his wife of 65 years!) talked about how Uncle
    Bert had been slipping a lot recently, but recounted how he would
    become most animated when watching the games.  "He'd pound his fists
    on the arms of the chair and mutter 'goddam Goodwell or Greenberg' or
    whatever that player's name was.  He'd always be sneakin' off when we
    had company over and I knew I'd find him in the parlor watching the
    game."
    
    Uncle Bert was 19 years old when the Sox last won the pennant, and I'm
    sorry I never got the chance to talk to him about it. I hope I live
    long enough to see it someday so I can meet him again and compare
    notes.
    
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1602XCELR8::DHAMELWed Jul 22 1992 13:558
    
    Correction:
    
    >    Uncle Bert was 19 years old when the Sox last won the pennant, and I'm
                                                               ^^^^^^^
    
                                       Should read "Enchilada"
    
29.1603SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Jul 22 1992 14:298
       Nice touch burying him with the hat Dickstah. My Grandfather was an
    avid poker player. We put a deck a cards in his pocket right before
    they closed the casket. He always wore a Red Auerbach-like loud sport
    coat, even if he had to go to the store for a loaf of bread. When the
    undertaker asked my grandmother for clothes to dress him in, she gave
    him a dark suit. He (undertaker) said "no way! he never wore anything
    like that." They put hin in his most outrageous jacket.
                                   Denny
29.1604XCELR8::DHAMELWed Jul 22 1992 14:366
    
    I guess they didn't put the hat on him so he wouldn't be confused with
    Matt Young.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1605CAMONE::WAYJust 33 and I don' mind dyin'Wed Jul 22 1992 14:3811
>    I guess they didn't put the hat on him so he wouldn't be confused with
>    Matt Young.
>    
>    Dickstah


Cold, man, totally cold.....


8^)    

29.1606AXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Wed Jul 22 1992 15:3510
29.1607Good for Uncle Bert, Dickstah! May he RIP!NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 22 1992 15:351
    
29.1608AXIS::ROBICHAUDRIP Howard SternWed Jul 22 1992 15:596
    	You know if I was Nissen or some other bread maker, I would
    ask Roger if he would do a commercial for my hamburg rolls.  Hey
    Dickstah at least Casey's uncle got to see those bums win a World
    Series.  None of us will die with that distinction.
    
    				/Don
29.1609CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Jul 22 1992 16:166
/Don -

One of the stations' had a commercial on this morning (fake) with Roger
shilling for Nissan buns (They give ya the control you need...)

JD
29.1610SASE::SZABOKen &amp; me: gone fishin'!Wed Jul 22 1992 16:4014
    > One of the stations' had a commercial on this morning (fake) with Roger
    > shilling for Nissan buns (They give ya the control you need...)
    
    JD, that was 'BCN.  Yesterday morning, they (Charles & Tank) called-up 
    Roger at his home and talked to him for a good 10 minutes.  As the
    conversation was drawing to a close, Charles axes Roger to hold on a
    minute while he played a commercial (the phoney Roger Nissen bun
    commercial), and afterwards, Roger was rolling!
    
    Listening to Roger giving his views and stuff, I've got a lot of
    respect for him...
    
    Hawk
     
29.1611 I'd sooner shut my radio off then listen to "BCN..CNTROL::CHILDSCard Carrying LibertarianWed Jul 22 1992 16:447
    
>    Listening to Roger giving his views and stuff, I've got a lot of
>    respect for him...
    
 
 It easy to give the right answers when you have a week to prepare...     

29.1612I wanna party with Bad Boy Roger!SASE::SZABOKen &amp; me: gone fishin'!Wed Jul 22 1992 16:486
    I dunno, Mikey.  Didn't sound like anything was prepared, especially
    the way Charles axes the uncanny questions which are very unlike the
    usual & predictable Bob Lobel/Mike Dowling/Mike Lynch questions...
    
    Hawk
    
29.1613Hawk, thought you didn't listen to BCN?GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPersonal Computer GroupWed Jul 22 1992 16:502
    
    
29.1614SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Jul 22 1992 17:064
       Ch 4 had their company picnic lasted night. They had one a those
    pitching cages set up where you get your fastball clocked by radar.
    Noone could fling a hamburger roll faster than 38mph.
                          Denny
29.1615XCELR8::DHAMELWed Jul 22 1992 20:188
    
    >          <<< Note 29.1612 by SASE::SZABO "Ken & me: gone fishin'!" >>>
    >                 -< I wanna party with Bad Boy Roger! >-
    
    You prolly wanna party with Uncle Bert, too.
    
    8^)
    
29.1616CAMONE::WAYJust 33 and I don' mind dyin'Wed Jul 22 1992 20:2036
|    >          <<< Note 29.1612 by SASE::SZABO "Ken & me: gone fishin'!" >>>
|    >                 -< I wanna party with Bad Boy Roger! >-
|    
|    You prolly wanna party with Uncle Bert, too.
|    
|    8^)
    

Been done already:


================================================================================
Note 20.128                   The SPORTS.Joke Topic                   128 of 128
CAM::WAY "She said she sure could take it if I roll" 18 lines  30-APR-1991 14:09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read this in USA Today yesterday.  It's true, not a joke, but it strikes
me as hilariously funny.


In (get this) Batesville, Arkansas, a 29 year old guy was arrested by the
police for disturbing a corpse.

With the permission of the funeral home, he checked out his mother's corpse
(she had died recently) and he took her to a party that she had requested
(but never got) before she died.

Police found her at the party, with a can of beer in one hand, and an
unlit cigarette in another....


Too much!

'Saw



29.1617PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 22 1992 21:184
    It was also done in a movie with John Candy starring as a cop who fell
    in love with a woman who worked at a funeral parlor.  Some of his Irish
    friends took a recently deceased friend out for one last round at the
    local pub.
29.1618CAMONE::WAYNeed a remedy for what's ailin' meThu Jul 23 1992 12:2716
>    It was also done in a movie with John Candy starring as a cop who fell
>    in love with a woman who worked at a funeral parlor.  Some of his Irish
>    friends took a recently deceased friend out for one last round at the
>    local pub.


Yeah, funny scene.

It's the one where John Candy meets Ally Sheedy for the first time....


And it is Baseball and Sox related, because they had a picnic in
Comisky Park for their first date....


'Saw
29.1619CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Jul 23 1992 13:3010
    Watch it Mac,
    We Irish only take the deceased to a pub if'n they still have money
    in their pockets. 8^)
    
    Speakin' of deceased, this is appropriate to the topic. 
    Butch finally blasted his team in public. What a sorry display by
    the team.
    
    MikeL
    
29.1620PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 23 1992 15:279
    What the heck happened last night anyway?  Around 10 pm, Viola was
    cruisin' and the Sox were up 3-0.  I flipped over to HBO to watch Tales
    from the Crypt.  When it was over I flipped back to the game and saw
    they were down 5-3!  I flipped back to HBO for Dream On and then back
    to the Sox in time to watch them look pathetic against Montgomery in
    the top of the 9th trying to overcome a 6-4 deficit.
    
    I heard something on the radio about a 5 run inning with 3 errors and
    only 1 ball leaving the infield.
29.1621CAMONE::WAYNeed a remedy for what's ailin' meThu Jul 23 1992 15:5119
>    cruisin' and the Sox were up 3-0.  I flipped over to HBO to watch Tales
>    from the Crypt.  When it was over I flipped back to the game and saw
>    they were down 5-3!  I flipped back to HBO for Dream On and then back
>    to the Sox in time to watch them look pathetic against Montgomery in
>    the top of the 9th trying to overcome a 6-4 deficit.
>    


Tales from the Crypt was really taking place in Kansas City last night.

Poor old Uncle Bert led a rebellion from the cemetary, and the living
dead took over on the field for the Sox, but they were all a bunch of
stiffs, so they lost.

Dream On was what the Sportwriters were telling Butch afterwards.....


hth,
'Saw
29.1622A real three-ring circus, I'm afraid...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 23 1992 15:5513
    
    > What the heck happened last night anyway? 
    
    Just replay the mental tape of what happened to Hesketh Tuesday night
    and you've got your answer.  Rivera made a couple of diving stops look
    more impressive than they really were but both times the ball trickled
    away, Boggs pulled Vaughn (who really looks lost out there) off the 
    base on a throw, Vaughn fell asleep momentarily and the runner on third
    scored when he made a throw to the wrong side of home plate, 
    etc...basically your run-of-the-mill Red Sox play...
    
    glenn
    
29.1623FRETZ::HEISERthe extremistThu Jul 23 1992 16:061
    ...and I thought the Angels were bad!
29.1624AXIS::ROBICHAUDRIP Howard SternThu Jul 23 1992 16:116
    	Got to love that NESN SportsDesk in the morning with Amy Stone.
    Right after you get the "low"down on the Sox game they immediatelty 
    follow it with the Blue Jays score.  Like somehow we should construe 
    the two to be intertwined.
    
    				/Don
29.1625Everyone said they'd miss the QMAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 23 1992 16:145
29.1626Plenty of seats available real soonCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Jul 23 1992 16:4630
    Don't know Mac,
    They looked pathetic in that inning, even more than usual. Even Frankie
    V. added to the comedy, attempting a pickoff play at second base and
    no one was around. The ball sailed into center field and was even
    uncatchable if Rivera had been near the bag. Simply pathetic.
    Loved Hobson's post game harangue,
    " I ain't taking the blame for this weak bleep bleep you guys had
    to watch the last two nights. I apologize to the people in Boston
    who listened to it on the radio and watched it on the television...
    if they continued to watch it. They probably turned it off trying
    to find the bleep Three Stooges. But I ain't gonna take the blame for
    it.  From this point on, for the rest of the year we're gonna find
    out who belongs here and who don't and who wants to be here and
    who don't. We'll find out. We've got a long homestand. We'll find
    out, every day, starting when we get to the ballpark. I don't have
    to explain it. You know what I mean. We try our best to prepare
    the club to play major-league ball like a major-league team. Right
    now we're playing like the Winter Haven Red Sox. My apologies to the
    people watching it in New England. It's embarrassing."
    
    And on NESN and the Blue Jay watch, hell, the Sox are in SIXTH
    place, one % point behind the mighty Tigers and Yankees. But look
    at the bright side, we're still 6 1/2 games up on the last-place 
    Tribe!
    
    And we're GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG GONG
    out of first place.
    
    MikeL
    
29.1627SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 23 1992 16:483
       If I was on the Winter Haven Red Sox, I'd be pretty steamed at
    Hobson!
                                  Denny
29.1628CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Jul 23 1992 16:505
Mac -

You should have watched Seinfeld.  Kramer moves like a Sox base-stealer...

JD
29.1629TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelThu Jul 23 1992 16:546
    
    Good for Butch!  I didn't know that modern day managers were allowed to
    talk like that to the players any more (since Billy Martin died,
    anyway).  I betcha Jack Clark's mad now!
    
    Brews 
29.1630Parade in OCT!!!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 23 1992 16:592
       Wade got his specs...says he cain see now!
                                Denny
29.1631CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Jul 23 1992 17:004
    Yea,
    He can see the ball much better. But he musta seen two Mo Vaughn's
    last night
    
29.1632Woof WoofAXIS::CHAPPELNyuk, Nyuk, Nyuk, That's a pipen !Thu Jul 23 1992 17:0211
29.1633SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 23 1992 17:034
       Wade axed Luis Rivera how he keeps them from fogging up. Rivera told
    him to rub toothpaste on 'em. I think he oughta take them down to
    Pudgy's, they'll fix 'em up for him!
                                  Denny
29.1634MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 23 1992 17:131
    Wade doesn't wear his specs to play the field...
29.1635WHERE IS THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE?AD::HEATHThu Jul 23 1992 17:156
    WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE ?
    I KEEP GETTING AN ERROR MESSAGE LIKE
    REMOTE NODE UNKOWN
    
    THANKS
    JERRY
29.1636SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 23 1992 17:151
    ...play the field? I thought he was happily married now!
29.1637JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jul 23 1992 17:1813
    re .1625:
    
    > Actually, the Red Sox had been playing some pretty decent defense this
    > season.  Were they just playing above their heads are now reverting
    > back to normal?
    
    Maybe they're a decent fielding team on grass, but have problems when
    they get on turf (where there's less time to react)?  Even in years
    where the Sox have been contenders, they've rarely done well in KC...
    
    
    py
                                                                         
29.1638re .1635 -- read note 25.1689JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Jul 23 1992 17:211
    
29.1639COBRA::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Jul 23 1992 17:4810
    
  >> Wade doesn't wear his specs to play the field...
    
     Mac's right, Wade doesn't wear his specs to play the field. To play 
    the field he wears a lime green polyester leisure suit, white patent 
    leather shoes with real imitation gold buckles and and he wears about 
    half a  bottle of Hai Karate.
    
    
    HTH
29.1640You can only shout in the Debils(tm) note...CAMONE::WAYNeed a remedy for what's ailin' meThu Jul 23 1992 17:5923
>                        <<< Note 29.1635 by AD::HEATH >>>
>                     -< WHERE IS THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE? >-
>
>    WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE RED_SOX NOTES FILE ?
>    I KEEP GETTING AN ERROR MESSAGE LIKE
>    REMOTE NODE UNKOWN
>    
>    THANKS
>    JERRY


WHAT ARE YOU SHOUTING FOR JERRY!?

The node that the Red Sox notes file is on actually moved last weekend
and it has a new DECnet node ID.  

First off, have your system manager update your database.  Meantime,
earlier in this note, or in the Q&A note (25.*) there is a command
string you can use to set your notebook entry to allow you to access it...


hth,
'Saw
29.1641MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 23 1992 19:302
    Not quite, Tommy.  I have it on good authority Wade wears cowboy boots. 
    He injured himself trying to take them off once, remember?
29.1642Tee-HeeCOBRA::BRYDIEThe last gang in townMon Jul 27 1992 14:552
    
     Wade "Mr. Magloo" Boggs went 0-4 yesterday. 
29.1643forgot his night tintCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Mon Jul 27 1992 14:581
    
29.1644MCIS2::DHAMELNo mane in Spain, playin' to reignWed Jul 29 1992 15:576
    
    Should be a good matchup tonight:  Roger Clemens on the mound, and
    Terry cooney behind the plate.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1645AXIS::ROBICHAUDChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMassWed Jul 29 1992 16:144
    	RE: Clemens and Cooney
    
    	I hope they settle their differences the gentlemenly way.  With
    their fists!
29.1646it ain't da shoesCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Jul 29 1992 16:158
    For those who don't like watching the pro's in the 'pics, feel
    free to watch tonight's Red Sox game.  I understand the team's made up
    of a bunch or amateurs!
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
29.1647Go O's!JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Jul 29 1992 16:165
    I'm going to the Friday afternoon game -- anyone know who the scheduled
    starter is for the Sox?
    
    
    py 
29.1648ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Jul 29 1992 16:437
    re: .1647
    
    going to the Red Sox game instead of the SPORTS get together. shame,
    shame, shame :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1649SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Jul 29 1992 16:482
       He cain stop on the way home. Mac said he was too!
                                 Denny
29.1650CTHQ2::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Jul 29 1992 16:509
    Actually TCM,
    PY would probly tell you he is going to an ORIOLE game. Still no
    excuse. PY, you and Waugamain owe us each a brew fer stiffing us
    for the game. 8^)
    
    MikeL
     BTW TCM, it has been voted among us RedSox fans that you and JD each
    us a beer for the 86 "gift".  Small solace
    
29.1651ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Jul 29 1992 16:597
    re: .1650
    
    JD and I voted that losers buy, so each of you Red Sox fans owe us a
    beer. Call it even.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1652PhtttttttttttttttCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Jul 29 1992 17:031
    
29.1653you started it, take your lumps like a real man!ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Jul 29 1992 17:043
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1654Thank God you'r not a Yankthee fan.CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Jul 29 1992 17:061
    
29.1655CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Jul 29 1992 17:166
Mike,

If I bought you a beer, I'd slide it down the bar to ya - but I'm afraid
it might go through yer legs.

JD
29.1656DOUBLE OUCH!! Touche, mon ami. You going?CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Jul 29 1992 17:181
    
29.1657CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Jul 29 1992 17:226
Mike

At this point, I'd have to say that I am going, at least for a little
while.

JD
29.1658rooolllingACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Jul 29 1992 17:254
    BRAVO JD! For that reply I will buy you a beer!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1659SALEM::DODADave &gt; DanWed Jul 29 1992 19:465
Can anyone recommend a good, quiet restaurant within walking 
distance of Fenway? 

thanks
daryll
29.1660PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Wed Jul 29 1992 19:5510
29.1661PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 29 1992 20:048
29.1662Grab one on your way out ... in the 5th inningSHALOT::HUNTHeartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay GinWed Jul 29 1992 20:237
29.1663CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Jul 29 1992 20:272
    
    
29.1664PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 29 1992 20:285
29.1665Good place to grab a tanCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Jul 29 1992 20:294
    Whoops.
    Good one Bob. I imagine it's a big gabfest. "Say who's up?"
    "Who cares, it's your round.".
    
29.1666MCIS2::DHAMELNo mane in Spain, playin' to reignWed Jul 29 1992 20:295
    
    re: .1663
    
    Hear hear! Well said, Mike.
    
29.1667:-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)SHALOT::HUNTHeartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay GinWed Jul 29 1992 20:3611
 Oh, Mac, do I have to spell out the word "S-M-I-L-E-Y" for you ???
 
 I know full well that Fenway is sold out.  Hell, Bahstin can always
 scrounge up 33,000 get-a-lifers who think somehow someway somebody like
 Joe Hesketh is gonna toss a no-no.   Or that Phil Plantier is gonna crush
 4 dingers.
 
 33,000 butts in the seats do not add up to a roaring throng when the BoSox
 sip.   More like a very large Back Bay funeral home.
 
 Bob Hunt
29.1668PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 29 1992 20:374
29.1669And watch Bawlmer winCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Jul 29 1992 20:4317
    Thank you Dickstah and to expound upon that,
    
    Mac is correct in this, as we NE'ers are well aware. The vast % of
    the park is sold out for the rest of the year, and let's face it,
    Fenway is a beautiful place to watch a game. Now we, well the realists,
    understand that the Bosox are woefully out of it, but I'm heading to
    the park on Sunday and am looking forward to it. Why? I like baseball
    and what a great setting to relax, enjoy a brew or two, eat some dogs,
    soak in some sun, ogle the tipsy babettes in da bleachers, observe
    the bleacher shennanigans, enjoy more brews, yell at Matt Young, 
    ogle some more babes, enjoy a couple more brews, make fun of Billy
    Hatcher as he re-enacts the Perils of Pauline in CF, enjoy a coupla
    more brews, wake up, and then go home. It's FUN!
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
29.1670SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 30 1992 12:072
       Forget the Socks, come on down to Foxboro for the rest a the year.
                                                  Denny
29.1671AXIS::ROBICHAUDChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMassThu Jul 30 1992 13:125
    	I suggest if you must go to a baseball game try McCoy Stadium.
    The tickets are cheap, the parking is free and the quality of baseball
    (AAA) is the same you get from the Red Sox.
    
    				/Don
29.1672SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 30 1992 13:142
      And the Chinese rest. across the street has great Fog Cutters!
                                 Denny
29.1673Sox lost, but saw some great ball at Fenway last weekendMR4DEC::WENTZELLIfMusicBeTheFoodOfLove,PlayOn!!!Thu Jul 30 1992 13:2011
    >	I suggest if you must go to a baseball game try McCoy Stadium.
    >The tickets are cheap, the parking is free and the quality of baseball
    >(AAA) is the same you get from the Red Sox.
    

Yahbut, at least at Fenway you get to watch the other team.  The Minnysoda 
games were fun to be at even though the Sox got wumped for the most part.  
Sunday's game had some fine highlight film defensive plays.  Baseball fans can 
usually enjoy themselves at Fenway even if the Sox don't come out on top.

Scott
29.1674CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Jul 30 1992 13:406
    Yo Slash,
    You gittin' on the Anvilhaid express to McCoy? 
    Free Pearl country club dogs and soda.  (Mich Dark in a Thermos?)
    
    MikeL
    
29.1675USCTR1::NAHEARNThu Jul 30 1992 15:098
    In response to the question a ways back......I believe Matt Young is
    pitching the afternoon game on Friday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
29.1676PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 30 1992 15:184
29.1677Better hope they score a lotMCIS2::DHAMELBarkley for Foreign AmbassadorThu Jul 30 1992 15:526
    
    Young will most likely pitch less than one inning no matter which game
    it is.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1678Did Clemens Win?RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Jul 30 1992 17:154
    What happened in lasted night's game?
    
    Rich
    
29.16796-5 SocksSCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 30 1992 17:202
       Yes, he's now 11-7. Cooney gave him all the close ones too!
                                  Denny
29.1680PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 30 1992 17:245
    Clemens struggled a bit last night only going 6-1/3 innings.  He threw
    a lot of pitches (and had to warm-up twice because of an hour rain
    delay), got behind alot of batters, and gave up 4 runs (2 of them on a
    Sierra homer).  He had a lot of strikeouts (at least 7), but certainly
    wasn't at his best.  Texas always seems to give him problems.
29.1681USCTR1::NAHEARNThu Jul 30 1992 19:416
    If I'm not mistaken, it was a Palmero homerun....not Sierra.
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
29.1682RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Jul 30 1992 20:0537
    Thanks, guys.......
    
    You know, I justed got back from two weeks on Cape Cahd. Got all
    excited when I discovered that the TV in our cottage had a converter
    box on top. Got even more excited when I found out that the owner had
    subscribed to NESN.
    
    Thought to myself....Man, am I gonna get my fill of the Red Sox during
    this vacation.
    
    Well, after seeing that team, night after night, showing ineptitude,
    carelessness I don't even see in the International League, a lack of
    desire AND (something I didn't expect) - BONEHAID moves by Hobson....
    
    Well, after a week, I didn't even care to watch them anymore and opted
    to take my son to see a few Cape Cod League games. 
    
    I can understand a team losing. I can understand guys getting
    outplayed. But I cannot tolerate a team that is outhustled,
    out-thought, outEVERYTHING. 
    
    I sincerely hope that they are surpassed by Cleveland this year and end
    up at the bottom of the heap. I think that may be the only way that
    management might make the smart moves necessary to bring the team back
    to respectability.
    
    I would trade Zupcic now. He will be nothing more than a Reid
    Nichols/Garry Hancock/Sam Bowen type player although he has drawn alot
    of interest. 
    
    They all seem to have given up. Hobson allowed Gardiner to hang himself
    and lose a game without even having anyone warming in the pen. If he is
    building for next year, say so and don't delude us into thinking the
    Sox have a chance this year.
    
    Rich
    
29.1683What is the easy way to Fenway???SPEZKO::SKABOMoney talks, mine say's GOODBYE!Thu Jul 30 1992 20:1514
    I have tickets to Sundays game at Fenway and having never been to
    Fenway (to Three Rivers and Forbs Field in Pittsburgh, many times ;*)),
    I would like to know what is the best way to get to Fenway from the
    north (NH) .....

    	o	Drive to Lechmere and take the T???

    	o	Park someplace close??? if so, where???

    	o	Something else???

    
    Thanks for any hints!!!
    	
29.1684Bailiff, whack his pee pee!!!!!! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Jul 30 1992 20:197
    NOTE'S P-NAME PLAGARIZER!!!!!!!!
    
    Jeff Needle's had that one for 4+ years!!!!!!
    
    hth,
    Kev
    
29.1685PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 30 1992 20:259
    I take the Green Line in from Riverside.
    
    Take 495 South to the Mass Pike.  Take the Mass Pike to 128S.  Take the
    first exit, take a left at the end of the ramp, follow past the hotel
    and you're at the Riverside Stop for the T.  There's plenty of parking
    and the train goes right to the Fenway stop.  Follow the crowd to the
    park (it's only a few blocks). The fare is free on the way back out if
    you get on at Fenway (if you get on the train at Kenmore Square you'll
    have to pay again).
29.1686GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPersonal Computer GroupThu Jul 30 1992 20:4013
    Whoa Mac...
    
    You're not actually asking this person to drive from NH down 495 to the
    Pike are you?
    
    Depending upon where in NH you're coming from you can take I95 to Rt. 1
    to the Expressway to the Dock Square exit and park at the Government
    Center garage.  From there take the Green line into Kenmore Square and
    the park.  Or you can take I93 to the Expressway and do the same.  Or
    you can take Rt. 3 in to 128S and take the Riverside Green line into
    Kenmore Square.  Riverside is in Newton.
    
    Mark.
29.1687PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 30 1992 21:004
29.1688PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Fri Jul 31 1992 03:155
Just park on Beacon Street in Brookline, a few blocks past Park Drive (where
the meters are 10 hours) and either walk (20 minutes) or hop the green line for
two stops to Kenmore.

j.
29.1689AXIS::ROBICHAUDChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMassFri Jul 31 1992 12:374
    	Better yet try to sell your tickets and spend the money on
    something more worthwhile than the Red Sox.
    
    				/Don
29.1690Where is the fan enthusiasm???SPEZKO::SKABOMoney talks, mine say's GOODBYE!Mon Aug 03 1992 15:4631
	Well, I went to my first Boston Red Sox game on Sunday at Fenway...
It took some time for me to want to go to an American league game, but I did
Love the old ball park, as it reminded me of the old Forbes Field in
Pittsburgh. The old classic field's (not many left) have so much to offer. 
Being close to the field, as not being miles away like the new super ball 
fields (Three Rivers, Riverfront... etc). But missing from Fenway was the fan 
spirit and fan enthusiasm. No wonder the Blow Sox are doing so poorly, if 
only the fan's and the Fenway keepers, would show some real support.... Some 
of the examples would be (as I have been to Pittsburgh games many times) that 
the organist should lead the crowd (34K yesterday) to cheers and chanting but 
instead, the only signs of life at Fenway was the people in the bleacher 
section passing a beach ball back and forth as the game was very boring... The
fans did try to do a WAVE, but it sort of died out most of the time 1/3 around
the field (it did make it around once, guess they woke up!). The organist did 
play when the game was over (if you can call it that). In Pittsburgh, as most 
other ball parks (?), lots of chants, air horns and the score board even 
starts the people into cheers, this is what is needed to help entice the home 
team, that the fans want them WIN!!!


	This is only my opinion, but would like to see more Fenway support....


Go Bucs!!!! Would love to see them play the Red Sox sometime in October!!!


btw: (-reply a few notes about parking) I parked at Leachmere for $2.50 and
took the MBTA ($1.70) to Kenmore Sq. - No problems getting in/out of the city..
easy for me coming down I-93. 

29.1691MCIS2::DHAMELBarkley for Foreign AmbassadorMon Aug 03 1992 15:525
    
    Fan enthusiasm?  It went south with the *team's* enthusiasm.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1692MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Aug 03 1992 16:004
    Apparently most of what you want to see at a ballpark is what most
    folks around here want to see kept out of Fenway -- the Wave, stupid
    things on the scoreboard, organists/scoreboard operators telling the
    fans when they should be cheering, etc.
29.1693SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Aug 03 1992 16:103
       Dickstah's right, daid teams get daid fans! The only reason anyone
    shows up is because they bought tickets 6 months ago.
                                      Denny
29.1694AXIS::ROBICHAUDChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMassMon Aug 03 1992 16:275
    	The same nameless, faceless suits who go to the Celtic games
    now go to Red Sox games too.  Corporate America's been daid for
    years.
    
    				/Don
29.1695PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Mon Aug 03 1992 16:464
Air horns?  The wave?  Beachballs as a "sign of life"?  Organists telling
people when to cheer?

You've got to be kidding.
29.1696It's the team; give it a year or two and try again...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Aug 03 1992 16:5214
    
    > The same nameless, faceless suits who go to the Celtic games
    > now go to Red Sox games too.  Corporate America's been daid for
    > years.
    
    I don't see too many suit-types out in the bleachers, though, and even
    they're dead.  This Sox team is the most uninspiring I've ever
    followed.  The contrast in fan response to marginally successful
    teams like 1990 and 1988, or even teams that hung in there for a while
    like 1991 and 1989, is huge.  And of course 1986 was one summer-long 
    party out in the cheap seats, many great games and much enthusiasm...
    
    glenn
      
29.1697AXIS::ROBICHAUDChronologicallyGiftedPersonOfMassMon Aug 03 1992 17:045
    	Glenn, take a look at who owns the lower box seats.  Back in
    the 70's you could get great seats without having to shell out the
    dough for a season ticket.
    
    				/Don
29.1698CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Aug 03 1992 17:1210
See, Red Sox fans are the most knowledgeable in the world.  They are so 
knowledgeable that the don't *need* to cheer or show enthusiasm.

They simply think of it, and it happens.  Silently.  But if you look around,
you can see smirks and smiles on faces, and knowing nods as they go absolutely
bonkers inside, yet remain stoic on the outside.  They are the M&M's of fandom.

HTH.

JD
29.1699CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityMon Aug 03 1992 17:2116
Nope.  It ain't that.

It's just that the Sox are mired in that no-man's land between being
marginally able to contend, and being so horrendously bad that the
fans could get into them being so bad (cf. New Orleans Saints fans
in the early years).

Right now they just suck.  So who gives a hoo-hah about the organist
whipping up the fans.   Or the scoreboard doing dweeby things.  Or the
Wave.  (The wave actually died three years ago, but some stupid fans won't
let the corpse rest in peace).

When the Sox give us something to cheer about, we'll cheer....


'Saw
29.1700CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Aug 03 1992 17:2947
DOn't listen to Saw.  He's just spouting Red Sox Fan hoooo-haaaa.

Here's the translation:


>>               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
Z================================================================================
>Note 29.1699                 The Boston Red Sox Note                1699 of 1699
>CAMONE::WAY "There are monkey boys in the facility"  16 lines   3-AUG-1992 13:21
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Nope.  It ain't that.

Yep.  It is that.  Fellow Sox fans know that by not saying something, one means
exactly that.

>It's just that the Sox are mired in that no-man's land between being
>marginally able to contend, and being so horrendously bad that the
>fans could get into them being so bad (cf. New Orleans Saints fans
>in the early years).

The Sox are a bunch of lunch pail guys give their all, but just are falling
on tough luck.  Our undying fan support is testament to the legacy of close
misses by underachieving happy-go-lucky teams.  We fans support them through it
all.

>>whipping up the fans.   Or the scoreboard doing dweeby things.  Or the
>Wave.  (The wave actually died three years ago, but some stupid fans won't
>let the corpse rest in peace).

We'd love to have car races on the scoreboard, but by not having them, we retain
a link to our past, namely, to anal-rentitive pilgrims who were so stupid they
came to this country without a clue on how to feed themselves.  Everyone knows
Pilgrim is an Indian word for "Dumb Turd"

>When the Sox give us something to cheer about, we'll cheer....

We cheer on the inside.  Shows of emotion are for intellectually barren 
yokels from Iowa.

>'Saw
>

"Frank"



Hope that helped.  ;-)   JD
29.1701RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Aug 03 1992 17:4824
    So, JD, you prefer auto races on the scoreboard and someone with a
    keyboard in front of him to give you a clue as to when to start to
    cheer?
    
    Don't you give YOURSELF enough credit to KNOW when to cheer? Don't you
    wonder, sometimes, why there is not an organist cueing us when to boo
    when the circumstance requires such a response?
    
    I've been to too many stadiums where people will munch on their hot
    dogs and swill their beer, hear someone say, "Hey, Merle, thar's that
    cute little rooster in a <TEAM_NAME> outfit. He wants us to say, Yeah!"
    And old Merle drops his hot dog and spills his beer 'cause he is
    conditioned to cheer when some ridiculous man in chicken suit is
    exhorting him.
    
    Red Sox fans can be some of the loudest and vocally supportive in all
    of baseball - provided the team is giving it's all. Just like fans in
    St. Louis, Chicago and Philadelphia. 
    
    Bottom line: We don need no steenkin' car races on the scoreboard and
    an organist to lead us in cheers.
    
    Rich
    
29.1702CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Aug 03 1992 17:508
Rich,

Though I left out the smiley's, I hoped they were inferred.   I'm a Sox fan too,
remember.

Ask me sometime about how much I 'enjoyed' going to the Kingdome....

JD
29.1703DECWET::METZGERMmmmmmm, Doughnuts.Mon Aug 03 1992 18:107

You lived for the hydroboat races on the big screen JD 

:-)

Metz
29.1704CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Aug 03 1992 18:119
Metz,

I did enjoy the 'Bil and Ted' short during the first game..

"Dust, Wind, Dude"

;-)

JD
29.1705RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Aug 03 1992 18:154
    Sorry, JD - Shoulda known better. 
    
    Rich
    
29.1706NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Aug 03 1992 18:2514
    
    > Glenn, take a look at who owns the lower box seats.  Back in
    > the 70's you could get great seats without having to shell out the
    > dough for a season ticket.
    
    Hey, I agree with you.  But the difference between the Celtics and the
    Red Sox is that you can still occasionally get a ticket to a Red Sox
    game, it might even be a reasonably decent one and it won't necessarily 
    cost you an arm and a leg.  Red Sox management might have invented the 
    fan rip-off, but the Celtics have perfected, patented, and franchised
    it...
    
    glenn
    
29.1707CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Aug 03 1992 18:4610
Rich -
No problem.

JD

BTW:  regarding this year's red sox.  This team doesn't even have an 
interesting characters.  No off-the-wall types to make this aweful year 
just a tad better - you know, no Bill Lee or Bernie Carbo or even an Oil
Can - no quotable quotes....sigh

29.1708SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Tue Aug 04 1992 10:384
    Billy Hatcher steals Home last night, first time a Sox player has done
    that in 19 years!!!111  (<- In memory of the dINZ)
    
    lEe
29.1709CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityTue Aug 04 1992 12:317
>    Billy Hatcher steals Home last night, first time a Sox player has done
>    that in 19 years!!!111  (<- In memory of the dINZ)
    
Who was the last guy to do it, and when?


'Saw
29.1710MartyMCIS2::MCDONNELLTue Aug 04 1992 12:351
    Marty Barrett 1988
29.1711WHAT a jump!!!!!HYDRA::HAUSRATHTime to change the P-NameTue Aug 04 1992 12:366
    
    Maybe it's the last time a Sox player has done it at Fenway in 19
    years..  but, I don't think Jody Reed has been with the team, quite that 
    long.   Jody was the last Red Sox player to do it.   
    
    /Jeff
29.1712CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityTue Aug 04 1992 13:1010
>    Maybe it's the last time a Sox player has done it at Fenway in 19
>    years..  but, I don't think Jody Reed has been with the team, quite that 
>    long.   Jody was the last Red Sox player to do it.   
    
The last time I saw anyone steal home in a game I was watching, was
Tommy Agee with the Mets, in the early 70s (or perhaps it was 1969, I'm 
not sure).....


'Saw
29.1713FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Aug 04 1992 13:567
    Jody Reed was not the last player to steal home.  According to both the
    Globe and the telecast last night, Marty Barrett did it in 1988 and
    Tommy Harper did it sometime in his career.  Both of those were on the
    road so this was the first steal of home in Fenway in who knows how
    long.
    
    John
29.1714MCIS2::DHAMELBarkley for Foreign AmbassadorTue Aug 04 1992 14:0514
    
    >    road so this was the first steal of home in Fenway in who knows how
    >    long.
    
    Must be park effects.
    
    Hatcher had it in the bag as soon as the catcher jumped in front of the
    plate while the pitch was on the way.  Good thing the batter didn't
    swing to try to protect the runner, or else the catcher would still be
    seeing birdies today while nursing a_aig on the back of his haid.
    
    Dickstah
    
    
29.1715NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 04 1992 14:1310
    
    Technically, Jody Reed may have been the last Sox to steal home as both
    the Barrett/Harper instances referred to straight steals, and the
    steal of home on the front end of a double steal is relatively
    commonplace, even for the Red Sox.  The problem the researchers run
    into is that the scoring rules make no differentiation for a "straight"
    steal, so they have to work from memory or newspaper accounts, etc.
    
    glenn
    
29.1716Mind ain't workin' yet this week.HYDRA::HAUSRATHTime to change the P-NameTue Aug 04 1992 17:596
    
    
    I probably heard Barrett and thought Reed.. you know how easy it is to 
    get 2nd basemen confused.   
    
    /Jeff
29.1717MCIS2::DHAMELA legend in six decadesMon Aug 10 1992 12:4412
    
    Jack Clark filed for personal bankruptcy this weekend.  Assets of
    around $4 mil and debts of $11 mil.  He apparently owes a lot on his
    classic car collection, and lost a bundle on some racing team he had a
    hand in.
    
    Hard to believe how much dough this guy has made in the last ten years
    or so, and he winds up in debt.  I wonder if he has some kind of
    gambling problem?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1718CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Mon Aug 10 1992 15:178
    Ya know there ain't much positive to say about the Yankees and the
    Yankee fans but.......
    
    I was rollin' bigtime when I heard the fans serenadin' Flat-Broke Jack
    by waving dollar bills when he came to the plate.  
    
    MikeL
    
29.1719SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Aug 10 1992 15:562
    Yeah, but it it was Sox fans, JD'd be in here saying how mean and
    inconsiderate they are.  
29.1720MCIS2::DHAMELJack Clark: Will DH for foodTue Aug 11 1992 13:158
    
    Jeff Rearend, the closer (pronounced as in "We're closer to the bottom 
    of the league than the top") did it again with a walk, followed by a
    homerun trot.  I don't wanna see his name on the roster at the end of
    this week, let alone next spring.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1721Unbelievable error by Mo. What concentration?CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Aug 11 1992 13:271
    
29.1722Tribe: Team of the mid to late '90sHYDRA::HAUSRATHTime to change the P-NameTue Aug 11 1992 13:297
    
    Gotta love Carlos Baerga..   the definte "sleeper" in the trade that
    sent Carter to SD for Alomar, James and Carlos.  Sure looks like a 
    sweet deal now, don't it!  Best thing is that Baerga is only 22, Alomar
    is only 25.  
    
    /Jeff
29.1723MSBOS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townTue Aug 11 1992 15:2925

     Well, ole Wade went 0 for 5 last night and is now batting a 
    whopping .264, which might not be so bad if he didn't also have
    fewer homers than teammate Ellis Burks who has been out since
    before Father Porter surpassed George Bush in favorability 
    ratings. What's worse from a Boggsian standpoint is that Wade,
    he of the mighty ego, seems to have lost his confidence. A
    swing and a miss by Boggs which used to be a rare occurence is 
    becoming increasingly less so, as are pops ups. Could it be that 
    someone has hung a garland of kryptonite around the neck of our 
    hero? Has Wade "I never met a mirror I didn't like" Boggs picked
    the worse possible year to have a really bad one ? Given his age
    there's a very good chance that this may be the last baseball con-
    tract Boggs ever negotiates and with every 0-5 game as the season 
    progresses a whole lot of dollars are subtracted. If a bidding war,
    or more likely a skirmish, were to erupt are the Sox willing to join 
    the fray ? Not likely, which of course would be fine by me and that's
    why I'm hoping this season has a lot more 0-5 games in store for Wade
    because it won't be enough for me to just see him go, I'd also like 
    to see him go on a real down note. Bye Wade, you won't be missed.

    

    
29.1724Judging from the "R" column...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 11 1992 15:367
    
> Bye Wade, you won't be missed.
  
    I'm afraid that the old Wade is already sorely missed...
    
    glenn
                                         
29.1725PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 11 1992 15:375
    He's also slumping in the field.  He committed his 14th error of the
    season last night and leads the Sox in this category.
    
    What is it with Sox players lately that they have such a precipitous
    decline?  Rice, Clark, Boggs...
29.1726CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Tue Aug 11 1992 16:085
Mac -
They haven't really declined fast.  It's just the inflated hype of SOx fans
and the press that built them up... ;-O  ~/~

JD
29.1727PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 11 1992 16:256
29.1728You'll never learn Mac. (-:SHARE::DERRYTake your time...hurry up.Tue Aug 11 1992 17:081
    
29.1729MSBOS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townTue Aug 11 1992 17:1112
    I don't know about Clark but Rice reminded me of a shot fighter 
   towards the end. His skills disappeared almost overnight and every-
   one could see it but Rice himself. He went from one of the most 
   feared hitters in baseball to an almost automatic out, often an
   automatic two. He grasped at straws by adjusting his stance and 
   swing, getting glasses but you can't turn a hamburger back into a 
   prize bull. Boggs seems to be heading down the same path. He never 
   used to get cheated during an at bat but now it's becoming a regular 
   thing.    

    
29.1730DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Tue Aug 11 1992 17:474
    All I know is that Rice IMHO never should've been MVP in 1978.  What an
    injustice!
    
    Bob "WILDCAT" Roper
29.1731Rice deserved it in '78SALES::THILLTue Aug 11 1992 18:075
    -1 Why is that? Say what you want about Rice, but in '78 he had an
    outstanding year. I dont remember his stats exactly, but I think it was
    as close to a triple-crown year as anyone has come in recent years. 
    
    Tom
29.1732PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 11 1992 18:304
    He's probably a Yankee fan who's miffed that Rice won it over Guidry.
    
    In the end I think it came down to a decision of everyday player vs.
    pitcher.  Both had outstanding years.
29.1733ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 11 1992 19:045
    And I am sure that .1730 would then conclude that Clemens did indeed
    deserve it over Mattingly in 1986 :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1734Mattingly > Clemens in 1986!DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Tue Aug 11 1992 19:4414
    re - 1)  Please don't get me started on 1986!!!
    
    re .1732
    >>He's probably a Yankee fan who's miffed that Rice won it over Guidry.
    
    
    Mac, you nailed that one!  I was a big Yankee fan in '78.  You're right,
    both players had superb seasons.  Guidry however had a "Magical"
    season.  One that will certainly be hard to match.  If memory serves,
    Guidry was 25-3 with a 1.78 ERA.  I'd be interested in seeing Rice's
    numbers again, but I suspect that those numbers have already been
    matched or bettered since 1978.
    
    Bob "WILDCAT" Roper
29.1735ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 11 1992 19:505
    Will someone post the numbers for Rice and Guidry in 1978 and 
    Clemens and Mattingly in 1986?
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1736Some rotisserie player could say for sure...SALES::THILLTue Aug 11 1992 20:042
    I may be wrong, but somehow I remember Rice having about 35 HR, 110 RBI
    and a BA of about .305. Not too shabby.
29.1737WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MRAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!!Tue Aug 11 1992 20:257
    
    
    78 Rice      46 hr's  139 ribbies .315
    78 Guidry    25-3 1.74 Era.
    
    86 Clemens   24-4 2.48 Era.
    86 Donbo     .352 31 HR's 113 Ribbies 53 Doubles
29.1738SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelTue Aug 11 1992 20:274
    
    Fisk > Munson
    
    Brews
29.1739A vote for Jim RicePOWDML::HEIERTue Aug 11 1992 20:2916
    The previous note is somewhat wrong.  Rice had a pretty remarkable
    year.   He batted about .325 with 46 HR and I believe 125 RBI.  I
    know players such as Fielder and Canseco have matched the HR and RBI
    but no power hitter since has matched those two stats with such a high
    on base percentage.  Also I do believe he had 406 total bases that year
    with over 200 hits also.  
    
    I'd have to say that was the most amazing offensive season in the past 
    15 years or so.  Imagine how much salary he would have commanded today; 
    perhaps eight million dollars a year.
    
    Guidry's statistics are correct. 25 wins, 3 losses, 1.78 era.  But
    remember that at that time, there was a great relunctance to vote
    a starting pitcher as MVP.
    
    Larry
29.1740ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 11 1992 20:3010
    re: .1737
    
    Thanks. Looks like a real tossup in both years.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
    ps Now I am sure a Yankee fan will complain about anti-Yankee sentiment
    in the media. Actually can the media really be blamed for that :-)
    
    
29.1741FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Aug 11 1992 20:315
    When the standards of how voting is done seem to change at a whim every
    year and with an inability to decide just what a Most Valuable Player
    is, this is an issue not worth getting excited about.
    
    John
29.1742SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelTue Aug 11 1992 20:336
    
    And don't forget that in '78 the Sox and Yeankees ended up with the
    same record 8^(, whereas in '86 the Yankees finished behind the Sox.
    
    
    Brews
29.1743PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 11 1992 20:3310
    Also keep in mind that in 1978 the Sox and the Yanks finished tied for
    first.  In 1986 Mattingly played for an also ran.
    
    Think about the word "valuable" and it's meaning.  Guidry and Rice
    arguable carried their teams to first place (and thus a good case could
    be made for either player).  I think Rice won out because he was out
    there everyday instead of every 5th day.  Take Clemens out of the Sox
    rotation in 1986 and they would have been a mediocre team instead of a
    pennant winning team.  Take Mattingly off the 1986 Yankees and they
    still would have been a mediocre team.
29.1744DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Tue Aug 11 1992 20:427
    Ahhh, 1978.  For a Yankee fan, it didn't get any better.
    
    There was a player for the Yanks other than Guidry who had an
    incredible August.  IMO, this player gave the team a monumental lift
    that summer.  Can you name this player?
    
    Bob Roper
29.1745ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 11 1992 20:4213
    re: .1743
    
    Good point. 
    
    But, the real problem is that the writers have never decided what
     "valuable" really means. Dawson in 1987 had a phenomenal season but the 
    Cubs still finished in last place. When Foster won for the Reds he had great
    stats but the Reds had such a good team they would have easily
    contended without him. And I am sure we could find many more examples
    one way or the other.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1746Munson >Bench>Fisk......WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MRAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!!Wed Aug 12 1992 12:3810
    
    
          Re-2 August???????????????
    
                 I know who had a great October(especially Oct. 5th)
    
    
    
    
                 The    BUCKSTER.......
29.1747FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Aug 12 1992 12:4332
    I went back and reread Bill James discussing the various MVP awards. 
    In the case of Mattingly vs Clemens, using his different formulae, he
    felt Clemens made more of a contribution to the Sox than Mattingly made
    to the Yankees.  In 1978, he felt the contributions of both Guidry and
    Rice were mathematically equal but since the Yankees won the pennant,
    Guidry deserved the award.
    
    It can be argued since after 162 games there was no pennant winner,
    Bucky Dent actually deserved the MVP since he made the leading
    contribution to the pennant being won.  :-)
    
    I still think, however, since this award has never defined itself it's
    pointless to argue about who wins in a given year.  Should it be the
    player with the best stats regardless of how his team does?  Should it
    be the best player on a championship team?  Is it the most
    indispensible player (ie, remove player A from Team B and they hit rock
    bottom)?  Then, the standard has to be applied consistently year after
    year for the award to have any true meaning.
    
    I don't know what the standard for MVP should be.  My standard for
    Coach/Manager of the Year is Coach/Manager of the Championship Team,
    and this disagrees with the defacto standard that says the award
    generally goes to the Coach/Manager of the most improved team, or team
    that outdid preseason expectations.
    
    While Glenn Waugaman disagrees with me, I feel College All-Americans
    should be chosen based on NFL Draft order and the Heisman Trophy should
    go to the player first drafted by the NFL.
    
    None of these issues causes me to lose sleep.
    
    John
29.1748WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MRAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!!Wed Aug 12 1992 13:2213
    
    
              I thought that there should have been duo Mvp awards in 86.
    Clemens pitched great all year and Mattingly was the 1st American
    Leaguer in the history of baseball to collect 230 hits 100 + ribbies
    and 30 + homers in a single season. Not too mention if the batting
    Champ that year(His name eludes me) didn't have a mysterious injury for
    the last 4 games of that season he probably would have won the Batting
    title.
    
             But Clemens got the award and it was much deserved and seeing
    Mattingly won it in 85 anyways it wasn't too hard of a pill to swallow
    for us Yankee fans.
29.1749MCIS2::DHAMELJack Clark: Will DH for foodWed Aug 12 1992 14:276
    
    The QE2 and Jack Clark both hit rock bottom this week.  Guess which one
    is cheaper to bail out and keep afloat?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1750WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MRAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!!Wed Aug 12 1992 14:467
    
    
    
             Wohhhhhhhhh
    
          Dickstah your p-name toooooo funny.
    
29.1751Hot August '78 Munson?CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Aug 12 1992 16:321
    
29.1752mebbe should be in my collection?CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Aug 13 1992 02:1810
    Gotta laugh about the WEEE EEEEE EYE broadcasters!
    They're pushing everybody to buy Indian BBall Hats as a sign of 
    displeasure and force "manglement" to make the team better!
    
    guffaw, guffaw 
    
    I remain,
    a disinterested Bayseball kinda guy!
    Kev
    
29.1753SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu Aug 13 1992 11:018
    Heard this the other morning on the radio:
    
    Butch Hobson wanted to put Jack Clark at first for last night's game,
    but couldn't because Clark had a sore arm.  
    
    Seems the arm was hit by the lid of a Salvation Army clothes container.
    
    Lee
29.1754So... have they hit bottom yet?SHARE::DERRYI think ya hear me knockin'...Thu Aug 13 1992 11:071
    
29.1755SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Aug 13 1992 11:433
       1/2 a gong out and falling. Hope they end up there, might be the end
    for ol' Lou!
                                    Denny
29.1756MCIS2::DHAMELJack Clark: Will DH for foodThu Aug 13 1992 13:2118
    
    Yup, they could be in sole possession of the cellar as early as
    tonight.  Whoop-dee-freakin-doo!
    
    Whooda thunk that a team with Clemens and Viola could be that close to
    being the worst team in baseball?  ERA-wise, they're still at or very
    near the top of the league.  Offensively, they're at or near the bottom
    in runs produced, batting average, on-base percentage, steals, doubles,
    singles, triples, homers, and just about every other category which
    causes or contributes to a win.  And with what they have down on the
    farm, the rebuilding process looks bleak.  It'll take a miracle worker
    to put together enough trades and acquisitions to contend, and that
    should be just about the time the pitching is all washed up.  Lou
    Gorman, BTW, is no miracle worker, in case you didn't already know
    that.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1757CSOA1::ROPERThu Aug 13 1992 14:4814
    Okay, finally the long awaited answer to the trivia question.
    
    <INSERT DRUM ROLL...>
    
    
    
    	CATFISH HUNTER.  If memory serves, Jim went 6-0 during the crucial
    month of August 1978.  Remember the Boston Massacre? (Yanks 4 games out
    in August, sweep 4 game series in Fenway)  Anyway, Hunter was
    magnificent the latter part of the season, particularly August.  Yanks
    needed someone to step forward other than Guidry, and Hunter was the
    man.
    
    Bob Roper
29.1758PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 13 1992 15:2817
29.1759The New Breed of GMMSBOS::BRYDIEThe last gang in townThu Aug 13 1992 16:039
    
  >> Gorman has at least come forward and said that his (and other GM's)
  >> hands are tied with the salaries.  He can't add more money to the
  >> payroll and other GM's aren't willing to add money to theirs. 
    
     I agree. It's really refreshing to see a GM shun blame. I'm so sick of
     the standard, "Yeah, it's the team I built and it sucks. So fire me. 
     See if I care." It's gotten really old.
    
29.1760Look in the mirror Lou!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Aug 13 1992 16:305
       Yeah, Lou's hands are tied because of the salaries alright. Who is
    it who signed this flock a cattle at these outrageous prices? I don't
    have a big problem with players making tons a dough, as long as they're
    PLAYERS, and not daidbeats like the Socks seem to get.
                                      Denny
29.1761GIAMEM::LEFEBVREI brake for tailgatersThu Aug 13 1992 19:083
    Rollward, Tommy.
    
    Mark.
29.1762MCIS2::DHAMELTired, poor, and wretchedFri Aug 14 1992 12:476
    
    Does a must-win game that keeps the Sox out of the cellar qualify as
    a big-game clutch win for Clemens?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.17631978 vs 1986 MVP stats....MEIS::SIKESMon Aug 17 1992 17:0914
                                                                          Team
                            Win                                          Record
1978     G  GS  CG   W - L  Pct    IP    H    R  ER  BB  SO  SHO  ERA     W - L
Guidry  35  35  16  25 - 3 .893  273.2  187  61  53  72  248  9   1.74   100-63

1978        G   AB  R   H  RBI 2B 3B HR HR%   TB  BB  SO SB   BA   SLG    W - L
Rice       163 677 121 213 139 25 15 46 6.8  406  58 126  7  .315 .600    99-64

                            Win                                          
1986     G  GS  CG   W - L  Pct    IP    H    R  ER  BB  SO  SHO  ERA     W - L
Clemens 33  33  10  24 - 4 .857   254   179  77  70  67  238  1   2.48    95-66

1986        G   AB  R   H  RBI 2B 3B HR HR%   TB  BB SO  SB   BA   SLG    W - L
Mattingly  162 677 117 238 113 53  2 31 4.6  388  53 35   0  .352 .573    90-72
29.1764I'm a Sox fan, but...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Aug 17 1992 18:3617
                              
    Both Guidry and Clemens deserved it, and we might as well throw in Orel
    Hershiser in 1988 and Dwight Gooden in 1985, too.  One of the biggest
    myths going is that a starting pitcher doesn't have the impact or the 
    value of a star everyday player (of course the same baseball minds that
    tell you this will also say, out of the other side of their mouths,
    that pitching is 75% of baseball).  A pitcher like Guidry, with a 1.74 
    ERA, gives his team about a 2.5-run advantage every time he takes the
    mound (in Fenway Park, Roger Clemens' 2.48 wasn't far behind).  You've
    almost got a guaranteed win once every 4-5 days.  The team wins 30 of
    the guy's 35 starts, finishes .500 in the rest, and they're just about
    a 95-win team.  Rice had one of the greatest offensive seasons of the
    last 20 years, but he was not as valuable as a guy who gave up only 53
    ER in 35 starts, with 9 shutouts...
    
    glenn
     
29.1765PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Aug 17 1992 18:392
    Keep it up, glenn, and I'll write to the Sox about having your season
    tickets revoked ;^)
29.1766back into the frayCNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Tue Aug 18 1992 13:439
 Ah Glenn, just being nice to Guidry to protect Roger...I for one think
 Rice deserved it and Mattingly also. Pitchers have the Cy Young award
 and although it's great to say hey we got a quaranteed win just about every
 5 days who carries you the other 4 days? The all-star everyday player that's
 who. Pitchers especially the AL variety have no business winning an MVP in
 my opinion. Heck there overpaid as it is already isn't that enough for them?

 mike
29.1767NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Aug 19 1992 18:1118
    Roger Clemens made his personal tribute to the Great One last night,
    wearing a number "33" on the side of his cap while warming up before
    the big bad AL umpires made him remove it.  So Roger went out and 
    pitched a 4-hitter for his 34th career shutout, a more fitting tribute
    to athletic greatness anyway... 
        
    For career milestones, Clemens goes for his 150th career victory on
    Sunday (and I intend on being there to see it, boring Red Sox or no
    boring Red Sox).  He's lowered his career ERA to 2.77.  Whitey Ford's
    was 2.74 and Sandy Koufax's was 2.76-- both compiled in pitchers' 
    parks-- and other than that there are none better from starting pitchers 
    post-WWII.  His lifetime winning percentage of .687 is now second in 
    major league history to Whitey Ford's .690, as Dwight Gooden appears
    to be fading into the sunset.
    
    glenn
    
29.1768ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Thu Aug 20 1992 02:303
    Yeah yeah, Gary DiSarcina (of Billerica) wore #33 on his back as
    a jersey number tonight...
    
29.1769SHARE::DERRYI think ya hear me knockin'...Thu Aug 20 1992 11:356
    Nicknames for Butch Hobson's new baby boy -
    
    Homer - 'cause the Sox ain't using it.
    Owen  - 'cause the Sox are 0 and one since his birth.
    
    
29.1770SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Aug 20 1992 11:562
       Well, they've reached their goal, they're ZERO gongs out!
                                    Denny
29.1771Not really.....CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Aug 20 1992 12:277
    yabbut they're sharing it with 2 others
    
    (for today anyway)
    
    hth,
    Kev
    
29.1772FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Aug 20 1992 12:504
    Even though he beat the Red Sox and fellow UMass alum Jeff Reardon,
    Gary DiSarcina sure made me proud last night.
    
    Ninj
29.1773CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 20 1992 13:038
Because a bet is riding on this day after tomorrow,  are the Sox and
Yanks TIED in the cellar right now?  (Haven't seen the paper yet).

Also, do they both play tonight and tomorrow night?


tanks,
'Saw
29.1774uh huh!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Aug 20 1992 13:0811
    'Sawmain,
    
    Yup, dey is tied for the celler!
    
    Dunno about the Yankmees but tonight=California, tomorrow=Seattle,
    Sattiday=Seattle, Sundayyyyy=Seattle, Monday->Wednesday=Oakland.
    
    Hope this hertz,
    
    Kev
    
29.1775CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 20 1992 13:5020
>    Dunno about the Yankmees but tonight=California, tomorrow=Seattle,
>    Sattiday=Seattle, Sundayyyyy=Seattle, Monday->Wednesday=Oakland.
    

Every year that we have gone to Giantsmania, Beak (you guys remember Beak,
right?) and I have had a bet.

If the Red Sox are ahead of the Yankees in the standings, Beak opens
my beers before and during the pre-game tailgate.

If the Yankees are ahead of the Red Sox, I open Beak's beers before and
during the pre-game tailgate.


I have never lost the bet.   Tonight's game and tomorrow night's games
will tell the tale....


'Saw    

29.1776better start doing finger Push-UPSCNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Thu Aug 20 1992 13:540
29.1777CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 20 1992 13:5612
>                    -< better start doing finger Push-UPS >-


Knowing Beak, he'll have bottles with caps that are hard to unscrew.

Thank God I've got an opener on my key ring!


8^)

'Saw

29.1778ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Thu Aug 20 1992 14:013
    Eh... I don't know...
    
    -Joe Morgan
29.1779I'd say it's better than 50-50 that you'll at least get a tieNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Aug 20 1992 14:218
    
    You might catch a break, Saw.  The Sox have two fairly hot pitchers in
    Darwin and Viola going the next two nights, while the Yankees have the
    whiz-kid Millitello against the 1st-place A's and then an undetermined
    stiff tomorrow night against California.
    
    glenn
    
29.1780CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 20 1992 15:036
I could live with a tie.

Hell, I'm in better shape than I was a month ago....


'Saw
29.1781It's in the OrangebookSCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Aug 20 1992 15:082
       If you guys tie, I think /Don gets to drink all your beers! 
                                  Denny
29.1782CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 20 1992 15:108
>       If you guys tie, I think /Don gets to drink all your beers! 
>                                  Denny


If you don't keep an eye on him, he tries to do that anyway [many 8^)]


'Saw
29.1783Shaadup 'Saw!AXIS::ROBICHAUDTabooIX-StarringWoodyAllenThu Aug 20 1992 16:541
    
29.1784Someone go to the game...JURAN::MCKAYThu Aug 20 1992 17:415
    I have 4 tickets for this Saturday August 22 vs. Seattle for sale.
    Section 31 row 4 seats 5,6,7,8.  My season tickets, nice seats,
    nice people in our section.  $10 per ticket.
    
    Jimbo
29.17858^)CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Aug 20 1992 19:3214
>>    I have 4 tickets for this Saturday August 22 vs. Seattle for sale.
>>    Section 31 row 4 seats 5,6,7,8. " My season tickets, nice seats,
>>    nice people in our section."  $10 per ticket.
    
>>    Jimbo
    
  Big mistake offerin' 'em up in here, Jimbo.  You'll be "shunned"
    nexted game!!  
    
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
29.1786JURAN::MCKAYFri Aug 21 1992 03:015
    I almost had a buyer for the tickets.  Price goes down to $30 for
    the 4 tickets. Why do I feel like I'm going to eat these
    tickets. 8*)
    
    Jimbo
29.1787Red Sox highlights warning!SHARE::DERRYBush: vegetable or noxious weed?Fri Aug 21 1992 10:164
    Maybe it wasn't that long ago but when was the lasted time the Sox were
    in last this late in the season?  
    
    Totally clueless.
29.1788SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Aug 21 1992 11:561
    1966!!
29.1789SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Aug 21 1992 18:437
    Re .1787
    
    "Totally clueless."
    
    Karen, isn't that Hobson's line now?
    
    Lee
29.1790SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Tue Aug 25 1992 15:384
    Heard that last night the Sox went over 2M in attendance, as they also
    took over sole place of last.
    
    Lee
29.1791CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntTue Aug 25 1992 15:577
THANK YOU Red Sox!


They held off just long enough so I wouldn't lose that bet.....


'Saw
29.1792MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrTue Aug 25 1992 16:0018
  >> Heard that last night the Sox went over 2M in attendance, as they also
  >> took over sole place of last.
    
     Yup, over 2 mil for the seventh consecutive season. Granted, Fenway is 
     a beautiful park right in the middle of a nice town but with the teams
     they field year after year they don't deserve such fan loyalty. Last 
     night almost 34k showed up to watch the last place Sox get drubbed
     by Oakland. Even sadder with Lou "I never saw a banquet table I didn't
     like" Gorman as GM you can bet the only thing the Sox will improve in 
     the off season is their grip on second tier status. How long will Sox
     fans put up with this ? As long as the Sox play in a small park that 
     puts tickets at a premium and as long as their fans brim with Hal-like
     optimism. The real tragedy is that Roger Clemens, the best pitcher in 
     baseball, has a better chance of winning the Hustler Honey of the Year
     than he does of winning a World Series ring here in Boston something he
     richly deserves.
    
29.1793PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 25 1992 16:2711
29.1794FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Aug 25 1992 16:3127
    Tommy, you summed up the problem with the Red Sox exactly.  Management
    has no incentive to improve the team as long as they are drawing over
    2,000,000 in attendance.  People know that with a small park tickets
    will be at a premium during the years when the Sox are in a pennant
    race and on weekends regardless of how well the team is doing.  Thus,
    it's in management's best interest to pour money into Fenway Park for
    the short term, even though Fenway Park biases the Red Sox negatively
    on the field.  Besides being small, Fenway Park is an attraction in and
    of itself.
    
    The Red Sox will not improve until they are forced to move from Fenway
    Park and this will happen for one of two reasons:
    
    1.  The cost of maintaining the place becomes prohibitive
    2.  The team is sold.  They can get away with Fenway Park now because
    the franchise is virtually debt free.  Once the Yawkey Foundation sells
    the team, debt is back in the picture and the small ballpark coupled
    with declining radio and TV revenues will force them to either jack the
    prices sky high or build a bigger park.
    
    When that happens, a major part of their attractiveness will go away. 
    They will then be forced to rely on winning teams to draw enough folks
    to pay the bills.  They will also be forced to build a team that can
    compete in 162 games a year, which means speed and defense instead of
    the long ball (which everyone will admit hasn't worked out this year).
    
    John
29.1795PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 25 1992 16:496
29.1796Say NO to Domes!!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Aug 25 1992 16:532
       I wouldn't pay to go to a Sky Dome. Well, once maybe, but that's it!
                                        Denny
29.1797MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrTue Aug 25 1992 17:0421
 >> I suppose Celtics or Bruins fans should also be called sheep since they
 >> haven't won a world championship in awhile either...

      Should "also" be called sheep ? Who called anyone "sheep" ? What I 
     said was the Sox don't deserve such loyal fans and they don't. Pats 
     coach Dick MacPherson has a commercial where he delivers the line, 
     "they told me build a winning team and they will come", the Red Sox 
     don't have such worries. They can stink the joint out (and do) and the 
     fans still show up. And it's not just that they're bad but this is one 
     boring team. I've seen more excitement at quilting bees. Like I said 
     Fenway is a beautiful park and there are few better places to be in all 
     the world than Fenway on a nice summer day but enough is enough. Red Sox 
     fans deserve better.

     BTW - "haven't won a world championship in awhile" ? How'd you like to
           wait such awhile for your next raise ? Continents are formed in
           less of "awhile" than it's taken for the Sox to win another 
           series.
    
    
29.1798Hehehehe....ICS::FINUCANETue Aug 25 1992 17:168
    
    So, uh, Tommy....  How many quilting bees have you been to?
    
    
    
    8-)
    
    Cath
29.1799Emotionalism aside, Red Sox fans have not been "cheated"NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 25 1992 17:3526
    Look for attendance to be down significantly next season.  There's
    usually a time delay in fan response to a lack of success on the field.  
    This is only the second season since the Red Sox won a division title, 
    and the first season since the early 1980s that portends continued 
    mediocrity.
    
    The Red Sox don't "deserve" such loyal fans?  Well, I'm one, and I don't
    think that any such moral judgement applies to sports teams, or
    conversely to their fans.  Teams sell a product and they get as many 
    customers as the market for their product will bear, no more, no less.  
    Granted, the Red Sox may play in a market that historically favors 
    baseball over football (something I truly believe, but on the other
    hand, for what they're trying to sell I don't think that the Patriots
    have been price-competitive for some time), but if they don't remain 
    somewhat successful they won't draw as many fans and they won't make 
    as much money, simple as that.
    
    To put it another way, half of all teams in all sports are below
    average, and half are above average.  Do the fans of the teams who are
    below average "deserve better"?  Nah, that's just the way the game is
    played; there's a winner and a loser to each one.  And which side of
    that equation have the Red Sox been on most of the time since 1967?
    
    glenn
    
29.1800CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntTue Aug 25 1992 17:4115
Fan loyalty is an important thing.   And you don't have to have a winning
team all the time either.

There were always second tier teams that had loyal followings:  The
St. Louis Browns, the Washington Senators, the Philadelphia Phillies pre-1980.

Some second tier teams never came close to winning a pennant.  As one
former player for the Browns said "Hell, if we won four in a row that
was something".   Yet their fans were still loyal.

I've been a Sox fan for 26 years.  I couldn't conceive of Not Being a Sox
fan....


'Saw
29.1801RDOVAX::BRAKETue Aug 25 1992 17:4339
    Why in the world should a Red Sox fan feel he/she should "apologize"
    for attending baseball games in the stadium closest to home?
    
    For heavens' sake, the Cubs stink and they get good attendence. Ditto
    the Dodgers. I dare say even the Phillies could sell close to 2 million
    ducats while fielding a last place team.
    
    Wrigley, the Vet, Chavez Ravine and Fenway have loyal fans. Win or
    lose. What's the matter with that?
    
    I think Sox fans are caught in a Catch-22. If they support a lousy
    product, they are merely abetting management's clandestine effort to
    stand pat. If they don't show up for games, they're a bunch of whiney,
    front-running spoiled yuppies.
    
    The problem with the Sox ain't the fans. The problem is that a
    tentative GM made some trades that, on paper, shoulda coulda worked.
    So, the Sox are stuck with a bunch of overpriced baggage that no one
    will accept in trade. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that
    out.
    
    I look at the Sox box scores every day. I see names like Vaughn,
    Valentin, Zupcic (rememeber when so many starters' names started with
    "B"?), Cooper and now Wedge. Boggs, Pena and Reed remain from the past.
    Bruno continues to hit well while Clark and Mario Mendoza are getting
    to know each other quite well. The 8 everyday players are changing
    faster than I would have thought.
    \
    But pitching? Past Clemens, Viola and Harris, it really isn't much. The
    team has no closer and no #3-#5 starter. And, from what I've seen of
    the Pawsox, there ain't much to get worked up for on the farm.
    
    I hope fans continue to support the team. Boston is a fabulous baseball
    town that Seattle could only hope to emulate. The fans don't deserve
    the lousy product on the field, but if a fan loves a day at the
    ballyard, why shouldn't he take advantage of it?
    
    Rich
    
29.1802PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 25 1992 17:477
29.1803DECWET::METZGERHello...ello...lo...o...o...Tue Aug 25 1992 18:0622
The Sox are lucky they play in Fenway park.

If you swapped the current M's with the current Sox the Sox in Seattle
wouldn't draw squat. Despite having the worst record in the majors 
I'd rather see the M's out on the field than this edition of the Olde
Towne Team. The players on the M's put out effort every game, they 
play solid defense, they have great position players and (other than
Randy Johnson and Harold Reynolds lately) don't whine continually.

The pitching staff is an absolute mess and the managers are probably
equal in stupidity but there is no doubt who I'd rather see at the
park..

If you took the Sox pitching staff and combined it with the M's starting
9 and found a real closer somewhere you'd have a division champion...

Other than Clemens, Viola and Harris this Sox team disgusts me with
their lack of fundementals and their lack of caring about how they
play on a given day...

Metz
29.1804PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 25 1992 18:1110
    Sorry guys, but I ain't buying the they ain't trying line either.  I
    don't think it is possible for anyone who grew up playing sports
    competitively to just pick up a paycheck and put a token appearance on
    the field.
    
    I also think it's interesting how we're hearing the cries of "boring
    baseball".  Some of these same folks are saying can the DH because we
    really don't measure excitement in terms of offense.  Well folks, you
    have the Sox involved in alot of low scoring, 1 and 2 run differential
    games.  I thought that was how you defined "exciting baseball".
29.1805MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrTue Aug 25 1992 18:1314
       re. Glenn

      Attendance won't be down "significantly" and the Red Sox damn 
      well know it. You'll be there next year and a whole bunch more 
      just like you will be there too because you can't put "emotionalism 
      aside" or apply macroeconomics when it comes to things like team 
      loyalty elsewise there'd be no Green Bay Packers. The Sox are the 
      only truly regional team in the game and they'll draw two mil or 
      close to it for as long as they play in Fenway. And if you don't think 
      you deserve better than what they've been passing off as baseball over 
      on Yawkey Way then I know you'll be back next year. 

    
29.1806FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Aug 25 1992 18:2027
    Rich, while I agree there's a lot to there just being a baseball fan
    and liking the game, I still think the Red Sox management won't make
    any significant changes until they're forced to.  What will force them
    to make changes will be a decrease in revenue.  This can be
    accomplished by a decline in attendance, a decline in NESN
    subscriptions or a decline in ratings on either their "free" radio or
    TV.  As long as they have 2,000,000 tickets sold before the season
    starts, they don't care about improving the team - they don't have to.
    
    I don't bash anyone for wanting to go to the games.  Fenway Park is a
    great place and I really enjoy watching baseball in the summer (and I'd
    enjoy it even more if the games weren't so damn long and slow, but
    that's another issue), and many of our fellow New Englanders agree with
    that sentiment as well.  Given the scarcity of good seats, I don't
    blame anyone for having season tickets, especially for the field boxes
    and for weekend games.
    
    It's a paradox, I know, but to me the only way the Sox are going to
    improve is for the fans to stay away.  I don't think that's ever going
    to happen.  For what it's worth, it's worked with the Patriots - we
    didn't start trying to improve both on and off the field until the fans
    of New England voted with their wallets and stayed away.  You can
    criticize the lack of results so far, but you can't criticize the
    effort and you can't criticize the results in some areas, mostly off
    the field (except the stat crew, which needed no improvement)
    
    John
29.1807Just remember Glenn, RedSox Magic #, 911CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Aug 25 1992 18:241
    
29.1808JARETH::YANKOWSKASsigh of relief goes hereTue Aug 25 1992 18:3413
    Metz hit on two big points in .1803.  Defense and fundamentals.
    
    There have been mediocre Red Sox teams and boring Red Sox teams in the
    not too distant past.  
    
    But I don't ever recall a Red Sox team that has botched so many plays
    in the field as this year's team has the past couple months.  If I were
    a Sox fan, this would have me reaching for the Excedrin a lot faster
    than the lack of offense or lack of a closer or Lou Gorman's
    shortcomings...
    
                   
    py
29.1809CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Tue Aug 25 1992 19:0013
 Mac both a 2-1 and 10-8 game can be exciting. Difference is the 2-1 games
 are the design of the Senior league (the only real league in MLB, IMO) and
 the junior league is designed for the 10-8 with geek....

 Didn't my buddy Clemens pitch a beauty the other day. Unbelievable stat from
 the other day if you wanted to bet Roger you had to either lay 120 to make
 50 or give up three runs. I'd have taken the runs in a heartbeat and sat back
 in rocking chair.....

 Is wade boggs hitting his weight yet????????

 mike
29.1810PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 25 1992 19:034
29.1811CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Tue Aug 25 1992 19:222
 Don't worry Mac he'll be back....
29.1812Waitaminute. The Sox are spending $40M/year to avoid change?NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 25 1992 19:2842
    
    Tommy, if every year were like this year I wouldn't go back, at least
    not for the number of games that I do.  But what exactly is it that Red
    Sox fans "deserve"?  Did they deserve the quality of play they got in
    1991? 1990? 1989, 1988, 1986?  (I'm not complaining about any one of
    those years.)  If your answer to my question is that the fans "deserve" 
    nothing less than a championship, then I strongly disagree.  There is 
    no moral claim by the city of Boston to a baseball championship.  None
    whatsoever.  That's the usual fatalistic woe-is-me crap that gives 
    Boston sports fans a bad name.  Loyalty and enjoyment of the game for 
    the way it's played (and I admit, *this year* it hasn't been played 
    well in Boston) are their own rewards.
    
    This business about the Red Sox refusing to try is so much bull, too. 
    If anything, they've tried too hard, and really screwed up doing so!
    In 1990, nine out of every ten doomsaying Red Sox fans said that the 
    team would pinch pennies and surely Roger Clemens would leave 
    town.  Result: the Sox signed Clemens to the largest contract in 
    baseball to that point, as they both expressed a commitment to winning 
    in the 1990s (at least Clemens has backed that up).  Since then they've 
    gone out and spent big bucks for Tony Pena, Jeff Reardon, Jack Clark, 
    Danny Darwin, Matt Young, and Frank Viola (not to mention the money to
    retain Tom Brunansky, Joe Hesketh, Mike Greenwell and others who
    haven't gotten the job done), and claim one of the highest payrolls in 
    baseball.  Does that sound like a team that's cynically sitting on its 
    expenses, counting the money that's pouring in?  Could a team have 
    intentionally devised a more *unsuccessful* strategy for wasting their 
    money and turning off the fans at the same time?  
    
    On the other hand, the Patriots are credited for the "great strides"
    they've made.  I think it's perception, mostly, coaching or 
    organizational changes that have proven to be cosmetic to this point.  
    Which team annually seems to lose more Plan B free agents than they sign
    (for a rebuilding team this should work the other way around), leaving
    themselves at a major disadvantage when it comes to overall team depth,
    a critical necessity in the NFL?  Which team just fired the young player 
    personnel guy who just last year was going to be instrumental in 
    rebuilding the team through the draft?  I still see disarray, I really
    do...
    
    glenn
      
29.1813MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedTue Aug 25 1992 19:4513
    
    The Sox are around 12 games above .500 at home and 19-40 on the road.
    For the life of me, I can't explain the big difference, other than a
    lack of motivation when not receiving the cheers at home.  A
    defeatist, lackadasical, poor attitude (lack of trying) is what I see.
    
    A couple of players will give 100% all the time, but as a team they
    seem to belly up on the road once the other team takes the lead.  It's
    probably a combination of lack of individual motivation, and the
    failure of the manager to motivate.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1814MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrTue Aug 25 1992 19:5619
    Re Glenn
    
     What do Sox fans deserve ? Better than the worst team in the weakest 
    division in baseball. Better than the only excitement at the ballgame
    being the "Guess The Attendance Quiz".  I never said that Boston de-
    serves a championship every year so cut the "woe-is-me crap" crap. A
    team with a little life is all I ask. Furthermore, point out to me where 
    I said that the Sox weren't trying. The problem with the Sox, as with
    most teams that are incapable of winning, starts from the top down.Gorman 
    put this team together and signed all of those highpriced barnacles
    you mentioned. The problem isn't that they haven't gone into the free 
    agent market. It's that they've gone in and come out with iron pyrite.
    As for the Pats they were a few plays (that's right "plays") from making
    the playoffs last year. The Sox will be damn lucky to improve as much as 
    the Pats did last year from the previous one.
      
    
     _Tommy
29.1815ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 25 1992 19:598
    re: trying
    
    I don't thinkone can argue that management has not tried to build a
    team, but sometimes you look at the team and have to wonder what they
    are thinking about, surely not baseball.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1816PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 25 1992 20:0218
29.1817DECWET::METZGERHello...ello...lo...o...o...Tue Aug 25 1992 20:0624
The big problem with the Sox free agent signings is that they are
throwing big bucks at marginal talent too often...

I don't think anybody has any problems with the signing of Viola or Pena.
They were good moves to make.

However throwing big bucks at Clark, Young, Darwin and Reardon wasn't
too smart. Clark was on the down hill slide of a good career. It was
spotable even without hindsight. Darwin was a 50-50 call after a year
where he led the league in ERA but didn't throw that many innings (I
think), Converting him over to a starter was a crap shoot, signing
Reardon was stupid because the Sox already had a good closer..Smith
was the better investmant at that time, signing Young for the contract
he did was sheer folly, after losing 19 games for the M's the previous
season Young was a total crapshoot who might have been worthy of a 
small investment but certainly not a huge free agent signing...

The Sox should stick to signing the big money proven free agents that
they can afford and stop signing the marginal free agents to big buck
contracts..Go after the Barry Bonds but stay away from the Danny Jackson,
Randy Johnson, Eric Davis type investments..

Metz
29.1818FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Aug 25 1992 20:1532
    I want to expand a little bit on what I mean about the Red Sox trying
    to improve.
    
    Misguided though they may be, they've attempted to do so on the field. 
    Their approach may have been wrong and their results may have been
    disastrous, but they've at least tried.
    
    They have to go through a front office revolution like they went
    through in September 1965 on the day of Dave Morehead's no-hitter when
    they fired Mike "Pinky" Higgins as General Manager and replaced him
    with Dick O'Connell.  That move more than any other built the basis for
    1967 and made the Red Sox into consistent contenders for the next
    quarter century.
    
    The Red Sox do a great job in marketing and promotion.  They have good
    scouting (albeit a bit biased for the uniqueness of Fenway Park), good
    minor league coaching and good player development.  They need more.
    
    They need a guy who will go out and scout the major leagues to see who
    is worth spending the money on and who is worth trading for.
    
    They need a team of guys who will go out and evaluate the minor
    leagues.  The Red Sox lag behind just about everyone else in baseball
    when it comes to pirating young prospects away from other minor league
    systems where Toronto is a leader in this area.  The Red Sox
    consistently are net losers in this area.
    
    I don't know if they need a new General Manager or not, but I do know
    that no matter who they have in that post, he's not going to succeed
    without more help in the evaluation areas.
    
    John
29.1819MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrTue Aug 25 1992 20:168
  
     I'll give you the worst team stuff but I still didn't say that they 
    weren't trying just that they were  boring and they stink. Tell me I'm
    wrong. And as for the Pats went from being the laughingstock of the NFL 
    to an entertaining, competitve squad. Although with this year's schedule 
    that could all change.
    
    
29.1820It doesn't take long to re-load in baseball...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 25 1992 20:2324
    
> The Sox should stick to signing the big money proven free agents that
> they can afford and stop signing the marginal free agents to big buck
> contracts..Go after the Barry Bonds but stay away from the Danny Jackson,
> Randy Johnson, Eric Davis type investments..
    
    Absolutely no argument here.  I've only been defending the Sox on the
    basis of their intentions, and what fans have a right to expect. 
    Cynicism aside, I think you will see the Red Sox cut most of the $14
    million in payroll that's available to them this winter (Boggs,
    Brunansky, Harris, Hatcher, Pena, Reardon, Winningham) and draw into
    the equal amount that goes away next winter (Reed, Greenwell, Burks, 
    Clark, Young), and make at least one big-ticket signing of an offensive 
    talent in this off-season.  Contrary to popular belief, the Red Sox are 
    subject to economic forces and must take some action this winter or they 
    will lose marginal revenue at the gate, and probably more importantly on 
    the tube.
    
    As for last place, so what?  I don't consider it to be a cataclysmic
    event (or maybe I hope it is a cataclysmic event).  It hasn't happened 
    to the Red Sox since 1932, but it's inevitable for any team...
    
    glenn
    
29.1821Dodgers in last as wellACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 25 1992 20:2810
    re: last place stuff
    
    Dodgers last finished in last in 1905. Unless they go 20-17 they will
    finish with the worst record they have had since moving to LA. The
    difference between fans in Boston and LA is truly highlighted by the
    reactions to their teams predicaments. No criticism intended of wither
    teams fans, just a remarkable difference.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1822PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 25 1992 20:2915
29.1823SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Wed Aug 26 1992 11:027
    Loved hearing Bob Lobel talk last night about the T-shirts being sold
    outside Fenway:  
    
    
    	Sox Magic Number is 911.     :*)  :*)
    
    Lee
29.1824CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Wed Aug 26 1992 12:319
 Keep up the good humor boys...hahahaaa

 now if his highness throws a few more stinkers this will indeed be a worth
 wile season....

 imagine you guys can't even pick on Cleveland anymore...

 hahahahahaaa
29.1825yRDOVAX::BRAKEWed Aug 26 1992 13:1246
    To me, the strength of any organization is it's minor league
    affiliates. I recall going to see the Tidewater Tides in 1969 in
    Norfolk when I was in the navy. They had a couple of guys named Ken
    Singleton and Amos Otis patrolling in the outfield. The Mets have
    continued to do a good job with their farm system.
    
    Ditto the Orioles, Dodgers and Yankees. In the Yankee case, they always
    seemed to trade really good prospects or brought kids up too soon and
    then gave up on them ala Dravecky.
    
    The Red Sox have usually had a decent farm system but, as John Hendry
    pointed out, they lacked the foresight to provide expert specialized
    coaching - even in AAA. This, I think, has adversely affected their
    pitching woes for years. 
    
    This years' Pawtucket team scares the heck out of me. I see very little
    help on the way from AAA. Retreads like John Shelby, Bob Geren and
    Steve Lyons toil as everyday players under Petrocelli. Admitted,
    Valentin, Wedge and Plantier were plucked from the roster. But,
    apparently, there was nobody down in New Britain to make the step up to
    AAA and develop further. I know Class A Lynchburg is tearing up the
    Carolina league but these players are about 3-5 years away from the
    majors. So, internal development looks bleak at this time.
    
    Contrast this to what I see with the Braves. Their AAA club here in
    Richmond has bona fide prospects like Ryan Klesko, Kieth Mitchell,
    Francesco Cabrera, Ramon Caraballo and Jeff Manto. They have a guy who
    can play all infield positions named Boi Rodriguez who has the highest
    HR per AB ratio in the IL. They have a real good pitching prospect
    named David Nied and another pitcher named Armando Reynoso who led the
    IL in ERA last year and is in the top 3 this year. Closer Mark Wohlers
    has shown his stuff in Atlanta already but is back down because there
    simply isn't room at the major league level for him. Add dale Polley
    and Randy St. Claire as middle relievers and the Braves should feel
    good about what is in their future. 
    
    And, at AA Greenville, Chipper Jones is making the Braves feel good
    about making his a #1 pick.
    
    Can the Red Sox feel good about their farm system? I don't think so. 
    
    One note of interest. For all you "Bull Durham" fans, Durham Athletic
    park (DAP) will be torn down at the end of the 1993 season. 
    
    Rich
     
29.1826Some life at Fenway, expect more today...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Aug 26 1992 13:2122
                               
    There was some small consolation in last night's game for those
    lamenting the lack of excitement with the Red Sox.  In the context of 
    a single game that doesn't have a whole lot of meaning beyond itself,
    this might have been the most entertaining and interesting game of the
    year for the Sox.  Beating Eckersley is so rare, and special when it
    happens, especially with his history of lording over his old team since
    his conversion to erlief ace.
    
    Also refreshing was the response to the A's usual intimidation techniques 
    (one of the things that has made them and Tony LaRussa great over the 
    years) after Terry Steinbach took exception to the Sox playing the game 
    the same way the A's like to play it, hard and relentless.  Danny Darwin 
    came out and stuck up for his 160-pound teammate Scott Cooper (who would 
    have been pile-driven had he responded to Steinbach's egging) by 
    plunking Rickey Henderson on the thigh.  Even though it resulted in an 
    important run for the A's, from this lifeless, last-place team I was 
    glad to see it.  Henderson eventually left the ball game, so expect more 
    fireworks this afternoon.  Tony LaRussa doesn't forget.
    
    glenn
    
29.1827JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Aug 26 1992 13:388
    re .1826:
    
    Cooper also made an excellent defensive play on a hard hit ball down
    the third-base line, a play that the Wade Boggs of 1992 would not have
    made.
    
    
    py
29.1828this from the anti-sox contingentROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Aug 26 1992 13:437
    re: .1825
    
    Cabrera and Manto are no longer bonafide AAA prospects in my opinion.
    
    I think alot of the Sox people forget about the injuries to Greenwell,
    Burks and Quintanna.  With those three players, they team would be
    alot better than they are now...
29.1829JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Aug 26 1992 13:508
    > I think alot of the Sox people forget about the injuries to Greenwell,
    > Burks and Quintanna.  With those three players, they team would be
    > alot better than they are now...
      
    I'd also add Jeff Gray to that list.   
    
    
    py
29.1830ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Aug 26 1992 14:0211
    
    Forgot about him AND Plantier.
    
    Greenwell might be no gold glove outfielder, but he is a .300 hitter
    and so is Carlos.  The teams problem this year has been hitting and
    not pitching.  Me thinks we those two and Burks in the line-up, the
    team would be above .500.  I'd still take the Jays or O's to win
    the division, but they certainly would not be in last.
    
    The injuries have given them a chance to take long looks at some
    of the guys in the majors, this will help in the long run.
29.1831Sox = living in the pastCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadWed Aug 26 1992 14:0724
To jump on a bandwagon a bit...

I agree that the Red Sox, at one time had a top notch organization, but time 
has passed them by.

The lack of instructors on the minor league level, along with the apparent 
inability to evaluate talent (most of the "future stars" to come up have been
mediocre at best, while we all know about good ones gettign away), the lack of 
major league scouting (I've heard they operate off year old scouting reports for
an entire season), the lack of talent in the front office (the Glob today has 
two columns that basically say that the job is too big for Lou Gorman, and he 
refuses to recognize it) all add up to a team caught in the 1970s.  Compare 
them to the Athletics, for instance - great scouting, top flight instructors 
in the majors and minors, etc. and the future is glum.  On top of that, the 
Boston fans seem to think that there are people on the roster that other teams
would actually be interested in trading for.

re: last night's game

Darwin pitched a gutsy game, and it is a shame that it wasn't his win.  Of 
course it would have been, if the defense wasn't so uniformly awful.  Glad the
Sox have a former NLer like Hatcher who can come through in the clutch.

=Bob=
29.1832FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Aug 26 1992 14:3038
    
    For the true believers, I present the 1993 Red Sox home schedule.
    
Apr 12, 14, 15	Cleveland 
Apr 16-19	Chicago
Apr 30, May 1-2	California
May 3-4		Seattle
May 5-6		Oakland
May 17-19	Toronto
May 21-23	New York
May 28-30	Texas
May 31, Jun 1-2	Kansas City
June 10-13	Baltimore
June 21-23	Minnesota
June 25-27	Detroit
June 28-30	Milwaukee

July 15-18	Seattle
July 19-21	California
July 22-25	Oakland
August 10-12	New York
August 13-15	Toronto
August 17-18	Chicago
August 19-22	Cleveland
Aug 30-31, Sep 1  Texas
Sept 3-5	Kansas City
Sept 13-15	Baltimore
Sept 24-26	Minnesota
Sept 27-30	Detroit
Oct 1-3		Milwaukee

Note:  All weekend games are currently listed at 105, though 1 Sunday game
will probably be moved to night for ESPN.  Weekday afternoon games are April
12, April 14, May 6 and July 21.  6PM games are April 15, April 16 and June 2.
All other weekday games are at 735.

John
29.1833MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrWed Aug 26 1992 16:0816

     Do you think that (just maybe) everyday when he looks at the 
    standings in the paper Joe Morgan has little chuckle to himself ? 
    He hung that "dead ass ballclub" tag on the Sox last year but 
    compared to this year's club that one looked like the '27 Yankees.
    Ayuh, old Joe gotta be sittin' on his back porch down on the Cape
    listening to the ballgame on the radio, drinking a 'Gansett and 
    having a few guffaws. On the other hand, there's probably a suicide
    watch on poor Butch Hobson. The guy has his dream come true when 
    Lou "Body By Budweiser" Gorman taps him on the shoulder to manage
    the Sox then he gets a reality smack when he finds he's saddled with
    baseball's answer to the Washington Generals and the future looks
    brighter in New Orleans than it does for the Sox right now. I guess
    it's true, timing *is* everything.
    
29.1834AXIS::ROBICHAUDMachoRoomsUpstairsWed Aug 26 1992 16:107
29.1835When the team rebounds the bandwagon will refill...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Aug 26 1992 17:2516
    
    > Why do they
    > draw 2 million fans?  'Cuz the racial makeup of the team appeals
    > to the yuppie brie eaters who own all the good seats.
    
    Please... if the racial makeup of the team changes do you think the
    place is going to clear out?  The yuppie brie eaters and the
    corporations who own the good seats are automatic renewals.  It's the 
    grandstands and the bleachers where attendance will fluctuate with
    performance.  Even a yearly attendance of 2 million is a drop of over 
    400K of these fans and represents a loss to the Red Sox of several 
    million dollars, straight from their profit bottom line if expenses 
    aren't adjusted.
    
    glenn
    
29.1836FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Aug 26 1992 17:5244
    The lower boxes are all sold to season ticket holders.  Those are
    pretty much automatic renewals.
    
    The upper boxes from about section 8 all the way over to section 33 are
    all sold to season ticket holders.  Those are pretty much automatic
    renewals.
    
    There is some proportion of bleacher seats sold to season ticket
    holders.  I don't think you'd see that change much.
    
    Most of the seats up on the roof are sold to season ticket holders. 
    That won't change.  The remaining roof seats go fast.
    
    The grandstands from section 8 to 33 are sold out on weekends.  I'm not
    sure how much of the grandstands or upper boxes beyond section 8 are
    sold to season ticket holders on weekends.  They are not sold out
    during the week.
    
    I would guess for any weekend game they have a minimum of 25,000
    tickets sold to season ticket holders.  Since weekend games are almost
    all played during the day, I would guess that weekends will continue to
    sell out for the forseeable future no matter how bad the team gets.
    
    I would also guess they sell a minimum of 20,000 tickets to season
    ticket holders for night games and weekday afternoon games.  When they
    start to lose attendance it will be noticed in the deep right field
    grandstands and in the bleachers first.  I have noticed some thin
    crowds out there for some of the weeknight games this year, especially
    against the poorer opponents.  I'd bet if Seattle was here in midweek
    last week, we'd have seen some dreadful crowds and I'll also bet the
    Milwaukee and Cleveland series next month draw poorly.
    
    Any weeknight game in April or May against a poor opponent remains the
    best bet for seeing a game and getting decent seats.  Even against
    a good Minnesota team in May I bought 2 great grandstand tickets at 7PM.
    
    Best bets for decent seats next season:
    
    1.  Cleveland on either April 14 or April 15
    2.  Seattle on either May 3 or May 4
    3.  Oakland on either May 5 or May 6
    4.  Detroit on either Sept 27, 28, 29 or 30
    
    John
29.1837MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrWed Aug 26 1992 18:0010
    
  >> Please... if the racial makeup of the team changes do you think the
  >> place is going to clear out?  

     The racial makeup of this team hasn't changed in thirty years and I
     doubt it will as long as the Yawkey Foundation owns the club. On the
     other hand despite Boston's horrible reputation (much of it deserved)
     I think if the Red Sox fielded an exciting, competitive club the fans
     would come out no matter what the racial makeup. 
    
29.1838Look at the greatest years of Red Sox' success...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Aug 26 1992 18:1321
    
  >> Please... if the racial makeup of the team changes do you think the
  >> place is going to clear out?  

   >  The racial makeup of this team hasn't changed in thirty years and I
   >  doubt it will as long as the Yawkey Foundation owns the club. On the
   >  other hand despite Boston's horrible reputation (much of it deserved)
   >  I think if the Red Sox fielded an exciting, competitive club the fans
   >  would come out no matter what the racial makeup. 
    
    I agree wholeheartedly with the latter statement, but I would point 
    out that by no coincidence the 1967, 1975, and 1986-era teams were all 
    racially diverse (by MLB standards), were all very successful, and 
    maybe most importantly were all very popular.  Whatever prejudices 
    Tom Yawkey may or may not have harbored (and it's indisputable that his
    cronies and associates were among the biggest racists in baseball), I
    do not accept the premise that he was only carrying out an agenda that
    the common Boston Red Sox fan requires and demands.
    
    glenn
    
29.1839AXIS::ROBICHAUDMachoRoomsUpstairsWed Aug 26 1992 18:196
    	I agree Tommy.  If a team is winning you could put 8 convicts
    out there and people would still pack the park.  But if a team is
    mediocre, or worse, more white guys on the team means more fans
    in the stands, and not just in Boston.  Just my opinion.
    
    				/Don
29.1840MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrWed Aug 26 1992 18:5211

      Glenn, I wish I had the rosters for each of the years you mentioned
     because in all the years that I've been a Sox fan I can't remember a
     single club that could be labeled as "racially diverse" by any standard.
     And I refuse to believe that it's sheer coincidence that the clubhouse 
     in Shoal Creek is more integrated than the one in Fenway. And I agree
     with /Don, Yawkey may or may not have been trying to give the people what
     they want, with the lack of racial diversity, but obviously they've liked 
     what they've gotten.
    
29.1841JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Aug 26 1992 19:119
    re .1838., .1840:
    
    The 1986 roster included Jim Rice, Oil Can Boyd, Dave Henderson, and
    Don Baylor.  
    
    Did Ellis Burks get a late-season callup that year?
    
    
    py
29.1842It's a sorry history, but there have been bright spots...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Aug 26 1992 19:3136
    
    Tommy, the racial diversity of those successful pennant-winning teams 
    was pretty well documented in a special three-part piece that ran in
    the Globe last year (which I saved to serve as kind of a mental
    benchmark on the social state of the Sox, 1991, if anyone is ever 
    interested in this subject as I am, as a Red Sox fan).  From memory, 
    the 1967 team had George Scott, Joe Foy, Reggie Smith, Jose Tartabull, 
    Jose Santiago and John Wyatt all as key contributors.  The 1975 team 
    had Jim Rice, Cecil Cooper, Luis Tiant, Roger Moret, Diego Segui and 
    Juan Beniquez (and maybe a couple of other part-timers I've forgotten).  
    The 1986 team had Rice, Don Baylor, Oil Can Boyd, Dave Henderson, Ed 
    Romero, Tony Armas, and Rey Quinones.  There *were* the most racially 
    diverse teams in Red Sox history (and above the MLB averages), and also 
    the most successful.
    
    Red Sox fans have *not* always liked what they've gotten.  What got this
    entire string started was the opinion (mine) that Red Sox fans have
    liked the team when it's successful, and have delivered attendance 
    hits when it hasn't been.  Certainly Red Sox fans *disliked* with a
    passion the pathetic, nearly all-white teams assembled under notorious 
    racist Pinky Higgins in the early 1960s (the Don Buddins and the Eddie 
    Bressouds and the Dick Stuarts of that era give at least a partial lie 
    to the assertion that, at the very least, bad white players will 
    tolerated).
    
    I'm not saying that Sox fans couldn't have done more, been more openly
    outraged and staged protests or whatnot.  I think what you'll find is 
    that the major sports leagues are not usually the most obvious or
    accepted political arena, and fans tend to vote more quietly, with their
    feet.  And (as was my point from the start), even Red Sox fans have 
    voted with their feet in the past, and will do so again if mediocrity
    persists.
    
    glenn
    
     
29.1843Elston Howard was also on the 1967 teamJARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Aug 26 1992 19:531
    
29.1844CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 27 1992 13:1424
I saw the New Britain Red Sox play the Canton-Akron Indians last evening,
at Beehive Field in New Britain.

Folks, things look bleak.   The Britsox are not hitting well, in fact
they look like Jack Clark clones.  The highest batting average on the
team is .246!

Their pitcher (forget his name) is now 3-19, but in watching him pitch,
he could throw some heat.  I'm wondering how he'd be doing with some
good ball players behind him.

The shortstop Bethea was pretty good in the field, but he had a horrible
night at the plate.


The Indians pitcher had something like 9 or 10 Ks in the game.  He was
throwing some smoke also.


Sox lost 3-2, almost pulled it out in the 9th with a 2-run homer, but
then the last man up (you guessed it) struck out.....


'Saw
29.1845FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Aug 27 1992 13:324
    The size of the New Britain ballpark is known for having a negative
    effect on batting averages.
    
    John
29.1846MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Aug 27 1992 14:3421
  >> The size of the New Britain ballpark is known for having a negative
  >> effect on batting averages.
    
      To the extent that no one is capable of hitting over .246 ?  I think
     the fact that now one down in New Britain can hit is a more plausible
     explanation for that anemic stat. It's often said (and probably true)
     that no city places as much emphasis on its baseball team as Boston.
     With the future looking darker than nighttime in Homestead the loyalty 
     of BoSox fans will be severely tested over the next few years. Granted,
     having Carlos Quintana, who just may be their best everyday player, back
     will help. And if Greenwell and Burks are both healthy next year the
     club will be significantly improved but there are some gaping holes in 
     this team. Furthermore, Burks has never really lived up to expectations,
     injuries or no, and Greenwell put the excitement back into the routine
     fly ball. You just can't win in the majors with a slow, one base at a
     time, defensively weak ballclub and that's exactly what the Sox are. But
     that's nothing new, is it ?
 
      
    
29.1847CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 27 1992 15:0927
|  >> The size of the New Britain ballpark is known for having a negative
|  >> effect on batting averages.


That and the fact that the bats had this tremendous tendency to stay
on shoulders.   Also, the fact that when the bats were swung they 
didn't make contact with the ball.  8^)


With the exception of the home run, the Sox were two hit last night,
and the first was a GIFT:
	
	Grounder to first, 1B toss to P who misses bag, then HITS
	back a half a step before the batter did.  (I was on the 1B
	line, perfect view).

	Ump calls the guy safe, Official Scorer flashes the H.

So the Sox had one legitimate hit before the homer.  There was one
line drive out, and one fly out, one foul pop, and the rest harmless
infield grounders.


'Saw 
      
    

29.1848Who hit the home run, Saw?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Aug 27 1992 15:4337
                   
    The Sox have only three everyday players in New Britain (and Pawtucket,
    for that matter, not counting guys being punished like Phil Plantier) 
    who are considered potential quality major-leaguers-- Greg Blosser (who
    is destroying the NB home run record this year, showing that batting
    average isn't anything), Jeff McNeely, and Scott Hatteberg.  The 
    shortstop Bethea may be a sleeper, but the rest of the high 
    minor-league talent is filler.  That's okay, though, as long as at 
    least two of the above-mentioned names pan out.  That's the real job of 
    the minor-league system, to produce one or two major-league talents a 
    year; not to win minor-league pennants (even though that's what AAA ball 
    has evolved into, to draw fans).
    
    As I pointed out earlier, three of the Red Sox' top amateur draft 
    picks the past four years are all-around athletic types with speed, 
    who also happen to be black (McNeely, J.J. Johnson, and the kid from 
    Florida they drafted out of high school this past spring whose name 
    eludes me at the moment).  They still have to prove they can hit first
    though, because unless you're a shortstop you just can't get by in 
    the big leagues on speed and defense alone.  The fourth top pick was 
    the much-heralded Frankie Rodriguez, who is a great athlete but has 
    been converted to pitcher because he also has a 95-mph fastball.
    
    I am not nearly so discouraged by the prospects of the Red Sox for the
    next few years as the Boston media and most of their fans are.  They
    like to talk one game-- rebuild from within, don't panic, be patient--
    but the reality is that when a kid comes to Boston and fails to impress
    in his first 200 ABs he's immediately labelled a failure.  I still
    believe that Phil Plantier, Mo Vaughn, John Valentin, and Eric Wedge
    can be successful big-leaguers (I'm not as sold on Bob Zupcic and Scott
    Cooper, though).  With the exception of Blosser, the Red Sox have been
    drafting heavily for althleticism and pitching over the past five years.
    It may not work, but at this stage that game plan is in place and
    should not be abandoned because the fans perceive that there's no hope.
    
    glenn
    
29.1849CTHQ1::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Aug 27 1992 15:447
    Park effects, eh?
    I didn't know NB had a 600 Club also. Good training for the Big Yard
    excusism??
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
29.1850AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismThu Aug 27 1992 15:541
    	MikeL, New Britain has a 700 Club.  They pray for a good season.
29.1851HAHAHAHAHA Good one /CTHQ1::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Aug 27 1992 15:591
    
29.1852CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 27 1992 16:1815
Actually, the park in NB is a nice little park.

We had free box seats (my dad got some complimentaries) and they've
actually put seats in the box sections.  Used to be bleachers, like the
rest of the park.

Beer is available and so is non-alcoholic brew ($2 for a 16oz, $3 for 
Sam Adams 16oz).  The food there used to be good, but I didn't sample it
last night, cause I'd eaten already.

Not a bad seat in the house, and they run a lot of the "lucky number"
type things in the half-inning breaks...


'Saw
29.1853PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 27 1992 16:3911
29.1854It ain't that badPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 27 1992 16:4511
29.1855PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 27 1992 16:508
29.1856MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Aug 27 1992 17:176
    >> Tommy, speaking of prejudice, what's this hangup you seem to have with
    >> those who are waistline challenged?
    
        Didn't think I had a "hangup" but I can see how others would after
       going back and reading some of my comments about Gorman. I'll try
       and be a little more sensitive in the future.
29.1857CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Thu Aug 27 1992 17:184
 big deal Mac, Boggs would have blown the play as well.....of course he'd
 have doven to the ground after the ball was already into left field to
 make it look good.........
29.1858RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Aug 27 1992 18:2842
    Pretty good assessment of the current Sox minor league situation,
    Glenn. I don't get to see or read anything about New Britain so I'm not
    at clear as to who is waiting for the train towards Pawtucket. What
    concerns me is what I have seen in AAA. I usually see the Pawsox
    everytime they are in town to play the Braves (now that the Triple-A
    Aliance is dead, that's a heck of a lot more than in the past) and I
    see alarming signals that bode badly. 
    
    For instance, last Friday night, the Pawsox came back to win 6-5 in 10
    innings. BUT, inning after inning, they would get 4 or 5 hits and move
    one base at a time. Other than Housie, who is hitting near .200, and
    Jim Byrd (slick fielding SS), they have zilch for speed. Lumbering
    around the bases, one at a time. 
    
    The only spark was Lyons. The guy is really a hoot. He was playing 3rd.
    Braves 2d baseman Caraballo is a threat to steal and likes to bunt.
    Everytime he came to bat, Lyons would charge to within 10 feet of home
    plate yelling like a banshee. Psyched Caraballo out big time. 
    
    Then, Braves 3rd baseman started jawing at Lyons about the antics.
    Lyons started swiping his feet around between pitches and I really
    didn't pay any attention. Then, when Manto went out to play 3rd the
    next inning, he started laughing and so did Lyons from the Sox dugout.
    Lyons had scrawled, "You A^%hole" in the dirt. 11,000 fans realized
    what was going on and started cheering and clapping. I tell you, Steve
    Lyons is one character.
    
    But, back to the game. The Pawsox, outside of Irvine, don't seem to
    have a reliever who can do much. Jeff Plympton comes in, looking as
    chubby as LaMar Hoyt, and tosses lollipops up there. I have to wonder,
    if the Sox have "anything" in AA or A, why don't they promote them to
    give them better competition? Morton is sucking rain water. Was he
    ruined ala Bobby Sprowel up in Boston last year? 
    
    The perception is that the Sox accept mediocrity. By keeping players
    like Matt Young and Jack Clark on the major league roster, by having
    players like John Shelby and Bob Geren taking up spots in AAA, they are
    sending a message to their fans that they are content at the top and
    don't mind clogging up their top farm system with has beens.
    
    Rich
     
29.1859PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 27 1992 18:486
29.1860PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 27 1992 18:513
    Hmm, the Indians have a farm team in Canton-Akron.  I wonder why they
    didn't make that team their AAA club.  Canton-Akron is a heck of a lot
    closer to Cleveland than Colorado Springs.
29.1861JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Aug 27 1992 19:0714
    re .1859:
    
    > Beehive Field is widely known as one of the worst hitting parks
    > anywhere.
    
    Also, the Eastern League as a whole is a pitcher's league (contrast
    with the Pacific Coast League, where everybody and their brother hits
    .300).
    
    But still, even a team playing half its games in Yellowstone ought to
    have somebody closer to .300 than .200...
      
    
    py
29.1862PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 27 1992 19:153
    Rumor today is that Jack Clark cleaned out his locker prior to the West
    Coast roadtrip.  Expectations are that he will either be traded or
    released.
29.1863CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntThu Aug 27 1992 19:3118
I had to opportunity to watch a lot of Steve Lyons when he played in
New Britain.   He was so enjoyable to watch, it made the game exciting.

One night, in a definite bunt situation, late in a game they were leading
by a run, I saw Lyons line up on the outfield grass.   On the warmup
he came charging in at 100mph, the batter laid down the bunt, Lyons
barehanded it, and made the throw to end the inning...  Great stuff.


Beehive Field is 325 down the left field line, 8 feet more than
Fenway.  The right field line is similar, it's no longer marked, but
I believe that it's 403 straight-away.

While it may not be a hitter's park, it is a Fan's Park, and next
year it might be fun for a gettogether....


'Saw
29.1864RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Aug 27 1992 19:5413
    >>Beehive Field is 325 down the left field line, 8 feet more than
    >>Fenway.  The right field line is similar, it's no longer marked, but
    >>I believe that it's 403 straight-away.
    
    Well, it sounds to me as though Beehive field fits in with just about
    most parks. The Diamond in Richmond is 325 down both sidelines and 402
    to center. I think McCoy has similar dimensions.
    
    Heck, the senior Little League field near my house has 310' foul lines
    and 390 to center field.
    
    Rich
    
29.1865NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Aug 27 1992 20:4321
    
    Forget about the dimensions.  Maybe the ball doesn't carry there (I 
    think they did move home plate out to reduce the distances, but it's 
    still a pitcher's park).  For all of the home run hitters the Red Sox 
    have had over the years, Greg Blosser is still the first player ever 
    to hit even 20 home runs in a season at New Britain, and he's hit 18 
    or 19 of those on the road.  But come to think of it, these days 20 
    home runs anywhere below AAA is a pretty fair accomplishment.  Maybe 
    it's the fact that in AA we're talking about young 20-22 year-old kids 
    who aren't fully physically developed.
    
    That doesn't explain the low batting averages, though, which say most
    of the players just can't hit the pitching they're seeing, for whatever
    reason, inexperience, lack of talent, whatever.  Jeff Bagwell (whatwould
    wedowithhimjustanunprovenkidneverknowhowaprospect'sgonnaturnoutcan'tpass
    uptheopportunitytowinitallwithaLarryAndersengodblesshim) won the
    overall AA batting title there two years ago...
    
    glenn
    
             
29.1866MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Aug 27 1992 20:447
    
    What would a "senior Little League" be?  All I can picture is a bunch
    of middle-aged guys with a mental age of under 12.  Do they provide
    all the equipment or do I have to bring my own spikes?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1867Dickstah wants a teamACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Aug 27 1992 20:536
    Hey Dickstah were you applying to join a senior Little League??
    
    :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1868H'mmm.....better than MtM's mebbe?CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeFri Aug 28 1992 03:0413
    Sounds like it beats Rugby!
    
    Where cain I apply?
    
    I cain cry, stomp my feet, swing and wiff at pitches, I like to play in
    the sand and chase insects.
    
    Could be my kind of game!!!!!!!!
    
    I remain,
    a competitive child at heart!
    Kev
    
29.1869NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 28 1992 13:4414
                                        
    > As I pointed out earlier, three of the Red Sox' top amateur draft 
    > picks the past four years are all-around athletic types with speed, 
    > who also happen to be black (McNeely, J.J. Johnson, and the kid from 
    > Florida they drafted out of high school this past spring whose name 
    > eludes me at the moment).
    
    Tony Sheffield (no relation to Gary, or Doc, alas) is the kid's name, 
    if anyone cares.  He's only 18 years old, plays the outfield, can run 
    but also has power.  He's the latest "next Willie Mays" in the Sox' 
    organization, so remember the name... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.1870AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Aug 28 1992 14:329
29.1871RDOVAX::BRAKEFri Aug 28 1992 14:338
    Senior Little Leage is the name given to organized ball played by kids
    aged 13-16 here in Virginia. Guess you Yanks call it Babe Ruth League.
    
    Read in this mornings paper that McCoy is 325 down the lines and 380
    to dead center.
    
    Rich
    
29.1872I'd rather see these kids than the old-timers at Pawtucket...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 28 1992 14:368
29.1873McCoy Stadium is fun too. And cheap!AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Aug 28 1992 14:501
    
29.1874CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntFri Aug 28 1992 14:5812
29.1875AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Aug 28 1992 15:315
    	They actually serve Samuel Adams beer there 'Saw?  Seems like
    the beer gets better as you work your way down from the majors through
    the minor league chain.
    
    				/Don
29.1876CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntFri Aug 28 1992 15:3317
>    	They actually serve Samuel Adams beer there 'Saw?  Seems like
>    the beer gets better as you work your way down from the majors through
>    the minor league chain.
    
Yes.

Bud, Bud Light, Coors, Coors Light, O'Douls and Samuel Adams.

Everything but Sammy is $2 for 16oz, Sammy is $3 for 16oz....


You do have to be 21 to buy O'Douls, but we figured that's because there's
no way to tell what you have in the cup (it all looks like beer) so
by limiting it, they cut they're liability....


'Saw
29.1877AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Aug 28 1992 15:344
    	At McCoy they serve a 20oz. beer for $3.00.  Fenway beer sips
    bigtime, as do the Sox.
    
    				/Don
29.1878CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Fri Aug 28 1992 15:4911
    Well I called in a request to Bob Starr to whistle " Leaving on a
    Jet Plane" to Jack Clark on the team bus to the airport. Seems he did
    a thorough job cleaning out his locker including name plate.
    
    However let's not jump the gun, though. My main main, Link da Fence,
    told me that Jack was seen sneakin' into a pawn shop on LaGrange St.
    looking for some weekend scratch.
    
    MikeL
    
    
29.1879MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Aug 28 1992 15:5610
     And the winner of the "Person Most In Need Of A Reality Smack
     Award" is...
    

    
     According to this morning's Globule, apparently Wade Boggs is bummed 
    that the Sox aren't willing to talk to him about a contract approach-
    ing that of Cal Ripken's.
    
29.1880CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Fri Aug 28 1992 16:006
    Rat on Tommy,
    Purty soon ol' Wade'll be talkin' in the third person agin.
    Maybe he needs Margo or somethin'
    
    MikeL
    
29.1881AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Aug 28 1992 16:103
    	I think Boggs *should* made Ripken money..
    
    	Billy Ripken.
29.1882Says Sen. Bentson.....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MRAIDERS just beat people up!!!!!!Fri Aug 28 1992 16:193
    
    
            Wade I know Cal Ripken, and Believe me Wade your no Cal Ripken
29.1883This O's fan nominates .1881 for note of the week!JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Aug 28 1992 17:171
    
29.1884Yes, Boggs has become deluded, confused, bitter...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 28 1992 17:4114
    
    Wade is hosed right now, badly.  He will not even be offered what the
    Red Sox "insulted" him with before this year.  Not only has he stunk it
    up this season but last year's excellent performance will put him over
    the ratings hump and make him a Type A free agent, requiring
    first-round draft pick compensation.  At this point in time the Red Sox
    will probably prefer the draft picks to Wade at almost *any* price, and
    there will be little push from others to give up theirs.
    
    I suspect that Wade will attempt to single out his agent for this
    miscalculation over the winter...
    
    glenn
     
29.1885Somebody else's Jack ClarkCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadFri Aug 28 1992 18:0111
RE: Boggs

The thing that makes me wonder is if the guy is washed up or not.  Early last 
season it looked like he was going down, but then he had a good second half.  
Thised year that is not happening.  You would think he would do the typical 
major league "dialing for dollars" in his free agent year.

There will likely be SOME ML team willing to pay him $4mil/year, but I wonder if
they wouldn't be getting hosed.

=Bob=
29.1886CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Fri Aug 28 1992 18:045
anybody who would pay Wade Boggs 4 million is in serious need of help or looking
for a tax write off....

the wimpy singles hitter this side of the planet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
29.1887I hopeCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadFri Aug 28 1992 18:074
29.1888USCTR1::NAHEARNFri Aug 28 1992 18:4125
    I personally would hate to see Boggs sign anywhere else!!!  Further, I
    think he would be a valuable addition to ANY team in Major League
    Baseball.....and well worth whatever price it would take to sign him!!
    He may be a singles hitter, but he is one of the GREATEST singles
    hitters to ever play the game....and one poor season (average to the
    majority of big league players) does not officially signal the end of a
    TREMENDOUS career.  Further, I find it to be a manager's shortcoming
    that a lifetime .340+ hitter with a .400+ OBP did not contribute more
    to his team.
    
    
    "Hey Tom (Kelly),  I've got a guy that will hit .340 for you and get on
    base 45% of the time......problem is, he's mostly a singles hitter,
    although he's led the league in doubles numerous times.......you
    interested?"   
    
    Everyone of the BoSox managers has s*cked in my opinion because they
    were unable to figure out a way to use such incredible numbers to their
    team's advantage!!
    
    Substitute .300 for the .340 and .370 for the OBP and the numbers still
    warrant interest and big $$$$.
    
    
    Nelly
29.1889would Lou Gorman qualify for stupid enough?CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Fri Aug 28 1992 19:050
29.1890...and Jack the whiffer too!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Aug 28 1992 19:202
       Absolutely! That's why he'll probably be back.
                                  Denny
29.1891PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Aug 28 1992 19:2018
    Fans scream for loyalty from the local players and teams.  There was a
    huge outcry when Bruce Hurst decided to jump ship.  However, when a key
    contributor to a number of decent Sox season starts to slip (OK,
    plummet), those same fans don't show any loyalty in return.
    
    Boggs probably won't get his big bucks due to market conditions and a
    bad year.  He hasn't tried to renegotiate contracts despite all his
    silver bats.  It could be argued that he was underpaid for a good
    portion of his career.  Do you think Ripken or Sandberg are actually
    being paid for what they are expected to produce over the next 5 years? 
    No, they are being paid for what they've done over the past X years. 
    Ripken and Sandberg got the money they got because they represent their
    team, i.e. they put butts in the stands.  Puckett will probably stay in
    Minnesota for the same reason.  Boston has Clemens for that and he's
    paid accordingly.
    
    I'm surprised Tommy is so down on Boggs because there are alot of
    similarities between him and Rice.
29.1892AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Aug 28 1992 19:244
    	Rice played in pain BigMac.  Boggs always had troublesome injuries
    late in the season, if someone was close for the batting title.
    
    				/Don
29.1893CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadFri Aug 28 1992 19:257
I hear ya Mac, but I also don't feel that Sandberg and Ripkin deserve to be the 
highest paid players in MLB.  Sandberg particularly has been a solid performer
for a number of years, but IMHO is not the best player in baseball.  So as far 
as the loyalty thang goes, it's one thing to pay someone for past service, but
another to make him the highest paid player in the game for it.

=Bob=
29.1894JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Aug 28 1992 19:3311
    re .1893:
    
    A big reason for the high value of Sandberg and Ripken is the positions
    they play.  Middle infielders have been traditionally looked at as 
    glove men first, and any offense they provide is a bonus.  Ryno and Cal
    provide 20+ HRs annually to go along with Gold Glove caliber IF defense,
    making them highly prized commodities...their value probably wouldn't
    be as high if they played, say, first base or outfield.
    
    
    py                             
29.1895Those are the breaks, that's all...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 28 1992 19:3617
    
    Until very recently (another reason why his value has diminished), 
    Wade Boggs put in full seasons, not these 130-gamers a lot of these 
    so-called franchise players average now.  The "lack of toughness" 
    label does not apply to Wade Boggs.
    
    Boggs has missed the big-bucks contract window on a couple of
    occasions, no question about it.  The last time it was immediately
    after collusion, right before salaries exploded.  But there's really
    nothing that can be done about it now, nor should anyone shed any 
    tears over Wade Boggs' financial situation (the lack of respect for 
    what he did in the glory years is another matter entirely).  The Red
    Sox just are not in a position, financially and on the field, to be
    handing out lifetime achievement awards...
    
    glenn
    
29.1896RDOVAX::BRAKEFri Aug 28 1992 19:4834
    Nelly - Great note!
    
    I've got to think about a guy named Ken Oberkfell. Played for the
    Cards, Braves and a few others. Always seemed to find someone willing
    to trade for or buy his services.
    
    Ken Oberkfell doesn't even approach Wade Boggs in talent.
    
    Boggs may be on the way down. Perhaps he doesn't get the right message
    from Hobson. Perhaps the Sox are actually serious about building with
    youth and Boggs isn't comfortable with it. Perhaps Burleson is screwing
    with Boggs and Boggs is being kind in not airing the issue. Perhaps he
    is genuinely slower, his refelxes have dimmed and his eyesight is
    blurred.
    
    The fact remains that, during the 80's, Boggs and Tony Gwynn were the
    premier contact hitters in all of baseball. For nearly a decade, these
    2 guys dominated pitchers. And, even with lofty credentials like that,
    Boggs was stiffed time and again at contract time.
    
    Admitted, Boggs was not the RBI man that, say, Mattingly was. But, I
    don't think that was ever supposed to be his job. And, frankly, it is
    one area of his game he could never master.
    
    He developed into a damned good 3rd baseman. He has begun to fade on
    the field these days but so have other stars.
    
    Because of his off field antics, his unbelievable ego and the fact that
    he plays 1/2 his games in Fenway, he will be derided, downrated and
    sneered at. He deserves some of it. But, he also deserves recognition
    as the best hitter in the AL during the 80's.
    \
    Rich
    
29.1897SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Aug 28 1992 19:575
       Sandberg and Ripken aren't being paid for being 'the best players in
    baseball'. They're only the 'best players who's contracts happened to
    expire last season.' This years 'best players' will be Puckett and
    Bonds,  and whoever elses contract is up.
                                denny
29.1898It's like with Larry Bird; it's because they're special...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 28 1992 20:1716
    Sandberg and Ripken were both paid heavily for the loyalty factor and
    due to fan pressure.  Ripken is 32, Sandberg 33.  Middle infielders 
    or no, neither will be worth their salaries *based on performance* in 
    the last couple of years of their contracts, if not earlier, and I
    don't think even their clubs are dumb enough to believe otherwise (look
    at Ripken's numbers at the time the contract was signed-- they're
    horrible, not much better than Boggs', and it's his worst season ever).
    Ripken even got an incredible one-way option for the last two years, 
    where if he doesn't produce the Orioles still have to pay him $6
    million a year, but if somehow he's worth more at that time he can
    walk!  I'm a big Cal Ripken fan, but even I didn't think that
    one-directional show of loyalty was right...
    
    glenn
     
29.1899DECWET::METZGERHello...ello...lo...o...o...Fri Aug 28 1992 20:3630

Wade Boggs was never stiffed during contract negotiations. He signed 
his contracts willingly. Nobody put a gun to his head and said "You 
have to play for $x"

Wade Boggs Has always gotten his due for being a great singles hitter.
Nobody ever said the guy couldn't hit the ball. He's gotten criticism
for failing to adjust to game situations, never hitting for power, never
driving in runs and poor baserunning. Whether these are valid criticisms
or not can be argued ad nauseum...

Wade Boggs is not currently worth what he thinks he is. He's never been
the Sox drawing card like Ripken and Sandberg are. He's always been over
shadowed by Rice and then Clemens. Financially speaking you pay the
big bucks to young superstars or older drawing cards...you don't break
the bank for aging, slipping veteran players that might rebound...

I cry not for Wade Boggs. He's made a great living out of playing ball.
He will be employed next season albeit not at the price he thinks he
is worth....

Clemens is the only player currently on the Sox who people try and see.
You'll see more of this in the future. Teams will sign certain players
for big $$$ and then try and sign the rest of the roster to low paying
contracts...

Metz


29.1900FDCV06::KINGSat Aug 29 1992 02:588
    Boggs is not worth 5 mil a year... 3.5 at the max... You will see
    salaries start to scale back for 2-3 tier players like Boggs, Gwynn,
    Whitacre, Sabo, Davis etc.. The big money TV contract has expired and
    the networks are not going to pay big bucks out when the super-stations
    are broadcasting the same game. The Superstars will get the bucks but
    the rest will get alot less...
    
    REK
29.1901CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntMon Aug 31 1992 12:078
Didn't see the paper, but heard on the radio that Reardon (aka Dan
Schneider) was traded.

To who, for whom?


thanks,
'Saw
29.1902SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Aug 31 1992 12:085
       Yeah baseball's really popular these days. last Sat. (8/22) CBS
    passes up baseball for exhibition football! Now I like football 10
    times as much as baseball. but considering the bucks CBS's paying, it's
    crazy.
                                Denny
29.1903Reardon is a BraveGRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseMon Aug 31 1992 12:084
    He was traded to Atlanta for two PTBNL.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
29.1904CAMONE::WAYCrucial TauntMon Aug 31 1992 12:1115
>    He was traded to Atlanta for two PTBNL.
>    
>    Dennis Faust


Thanks Dennis.

Gee, sounds like the Cone deal.

Watch for Reardon to catch on fire now that he's out of Boston....



'Saw    

29.19052 minor leaguersCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeMon Aug 31 1992 12:179
    The two PTBNL both are minor league players.  One is a pitcher
    with a ERA of ~2.5, winning record.  I don't recall eggzactly
    if the other is a SS  or an outfielder.
    
    Supposedly Hotlanta has a fairly strong farm system.
    
    hth,
    Kev
     
29.1906MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedMon Aug 31 1992 12:295
    
    Look for a new stat to be created for relievers:  Blown Pennants.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1907RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Aug 31 1992 13:1435
    >> The two PTBNL both are minor league players.  One is a pitcher
    >> with a ERA of ~2.5, winning record.  I don't recall eggzactly
    >> if the other is a SS  or an outfielder.
    
    There are 2 pitchers on the Richmond roster that meet this description.
    One is David Nied who has a tremendous amount of talent and who Atlanta
    has been showing great interest in. The other is Armando Reynoso who
    has had a couple cups of coffee in the bigs, is in his mid-late 20's
    and who, last year, won the IL ERA title. Nied throws hard and is
    learning to throw a curve more effectively. Reynoso relies on control
    more.
    
    The starting SS for the Richmond Braves is Vinny Castilla. The guy can
    hit but is an adventure in the field. Very erratic glove, limited
    range, string arm. Outfielders include Kieth Mitchel (currently hitting
    around .220) Andy Tomberlain (although he excels in McCoy Stadium
    versus the Pawsox, he has been nothing more than a Sam Bowen/Garry
    Hancock clone down here), Sean Ross (pretty good speed, some power,
    great glove, weak arm) and, for the life of me, I can't recall the 4th
    outfielder who has a great bat, better than average speed, good arm and
    glove. With the exception of Tomberlain, all Braves outfielders are
    threats to steal.
    
    If you got questions on any Braves' prospects, let me know and, if I
    don't get TFSO'd, I'll keep you up to date.
    
    >> Supposedly Hotlanta has a fairly strong farm system.
    
    Yes, I think they are strong. They don't have the team talent of
    Columbus or Scraton-Wilkes-Barre in the IL but some of their individual
    players are really something. Chris Chambliss has shown to be a really
    postive influence on these kids.
    
    Rich
    
29.1908Not bad, considering Reardon has no value to the SoxNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Aug 31 1992 13:379
    
    The players rumored to be coming to Boston are 25-year-old Sean Ross 
    (forget it, non-prospect) and 23-year-old RHP Nate Minchey (excellent 
    stats at AA Greenville, control pitcher, not overpowering).  Second
    baseman Ramon Carabello was also mentioned by ESPN, but he's probably a
    bit too much of a prospect for the Braves to give up for Reardon...
    
    glenn
    
29.1909RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Aug 31 1992 13:4517
    Ross "could" be something. He has more power than Wayne Housie but
    lacks dicipline at the plate. 
    
    Caraballo would have been a  great deal for the Sox. He's tiny, but
    can run with the wind. Steals bases like mad. Made instant impact upon
    being called up from Greenville.
    
    Have not heard anything in Richmond papers about Nate Minchey. And we
    usually do get advance notice on AA prospects. We heard raves about
    Klesko last year and, this year, heard alot about Caraballo. Now we
    read alot about Chipper Jones.
    
    I guess I agree with Glenn's assessment on Ross, though. Certainly not
    much to get excited about.
    
    Rich
    
29.1910PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 02 1992 13:402
    Roger Clemens was named AL pitcher of the month for August.  During the
    month Roger went 5-1 with a 1.90 ERA, 3 complete games, and 1 shutout.
29.1911CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Sep 02 1992 13:546
    So what's the verdict on Matt Young? 
    Is Lou gonna now want him back because of a couple of ok games?
    I hear he tossed a pickoff attempt away agin. That's the Matt both
    we Bosox and Mariners fans know.
    
    
29.1912big deal who'd beat Cleveland and the Yankmees?CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Wed Sep 02 1992 14:072
 Jack Morris got robbed!!!! Atleast the BlueJays games mean something...
29.1913NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 02 1992 14:3013
                                        
 > Jack Morris got robbed!!!! Atleast the BlueJays games mean something...
    
    Morris   33.0 IP   4-1  3.55 ERA
    Clemens  47.1 IP   5-1  1.90 ERA
    
    Update on Matt Young:
    
    Still winless since May, 1991, and still a member of the Boston Red
    Sox, for some inexplicable reason...
    
    glenn
     
29.1914MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedWed Sep 02 1992 14:437
    
    And Jack Morris' has 18 wins with an ERA over 4.00.  Just shows to
    go ya why the number of wins should *not* carry the most weight when
    it comes to Cy Young votes.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1915CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Sep 02 1992 14:4913
Dickstah -

I tend to disagree.   Morris is pitching in the pressure of a pennant race -
and has all year.  The closest Roger has had to pressure was running out
of rice to exercise his arm in.

The Sox are out of it.  Roger is doing well.  Jack Morris is 6-1 in his last
7 starts - all at a time when the Jays have been struggling, and have had
Guzman out with injuries.   Roger has wet dreams that he could perform
like Morris does under pressure.  See last year's world series  for more
proof.

JD
29.1916has he blown any saves this year?CNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Wed Sep 02 1992 14:539
 I thought I saw on ESPN that Morris was also 5-1 in August? So Clemens
 has a better ERA big deal. Morris is carrying Toronto on his back to
 the playoffs maybe. Clemens is just inflating his stats against a bunch
 of loosers in meaningless games.

 as for the CY....I say give it to the ECK!!!!

 mike
29.1917CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Sep 02 1992 14:553
I agree with Mike.  If Dennis Eckersly doesn't win the Cy Young, its a travesty.

JD
29.1918Th' Eck deserves CyCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadWed Sep 02 1992 14:566
29.1919FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 02 1992 15:105
    Well, I just hope you guys are consistent when your favorite player has
    a great season playing for a lousy team and he doesn't get an award for
    it.
    
    John
29.1920Yeah, the Sox stink so Clemens should take the rap...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 02 1992 15:1521
    
    Of course Dennis Eckersley himself says that the Cy Young Award belongs 
    to mainly-main 250-IP starting pitchers, not one-inning guys.  Even if 
    the Eck had blown five or six saves (instead of his one) like the 
    average reliever and the A's had gone on to lose most of those games, 
    they'd still in first place with room to spare.  Somebody's got to get
    him that lead before he goes to work.
    
    Pressure or no pressure, the Blue Jays are scoring more runs for Jack
    Morris than for their other starters.  Last I checked, the DH rule was
    still in effect and Morris doesn't bring his bat to the plate, so what
    accounts for the difference?  Can you say "luck"?
    
    If Roger Clemens finishes up with 20+ wins and an ERA hovering around
    2.00 over his 270-280 innings and wins the Cy Young, it will be
    controversial but no travesty.  Not until they change the rules to
    state that "only players from division winners are eligible for
    postseason awards".
    
    glenn
    
29.1921PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 02 1992 15:1610
29.1922PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 02 1992 15:226
29.1923MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedWed Sep 02 1992 15:476
    
    Jack Morris getting a win in 8-4 games is more a reflection on his
    team, not the pitcher.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1924Was this 1966??ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Sep 02 1992 16:014
    When was the last time the Red Sox finsished the season under .500??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1925FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 02 1992 16:074
    Nope.  It was either 1987 or 1989.  I don't have the records in front
    of me so I can't say for sure.  Before then, it was 1983.
    
    John
29.1926SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Wed Sep 02 1992 16:274
    C'mon Mac, you should know that Mike will support anyone that's going
    up against the Rocket!  :*)
    
    lEe
29.1927AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismWed Sep 02 1992 16:307
    	An E.R.A. of 4 is pretty hefty and considering the Jays defense
    is one of the better ones, I would guess there are no cheapies.
    The only reason Toronto is in a pennant race is because they've
    consistently underperformed all year.  I say congrats to Rajah on
    a well deserved award.
    
    				/Don
29.1928undressed again by Dinz's buddyCNTROL::CHILDSIf Bush was a horse, you'd shoot em'Wed Sep 02 1992 17:577
LEe, unless you got something useful to add to the argument butt out will
ya!!!

;^) lots of em'

mike
29.1929Rocket will grab # 4ROULET::GARRYDALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACKWed Sep 02 1992 18:157
    re.   Until against Boston says it all......no Cy for Eck......giving
          up runs to Boston of all teams....
    
    Roger should start making room on his mantle for # 4....
    
    
    Tom
29.1930CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Sep 02 1992 18:567
    Yep,
    Rog might git a few more before he's done, and unless he gits goin
    elsewhere, don't look like he'sd gonna have that cherished Ring
    to center his mantlepiece.
    
    MikeL
    
29.1931RDOVAX::BRAKEWed Sep 02 1992 20:2024
    Clemens is #2 in the AL in strikeouts - 1 behind Perez.
    
    Clemens has one of the 5 lowest ERA's of AL starters.
    
    Clemens is only 2 wins behind the winningest pitcher in ther AL.
    
    Clemens had 3 or 4 games blown by his bullpen.
    
    Clemens is pitching for a team with the lowest BA in the AL, lowest
    runs produced and lowest # of HR's.
    
    Clemens pitches for a team not known for it's defense.
    
    I think if you took his stats for 1992 and applied them to a pitcher
    for the Mariners, Phillies or Angels, you'd have to say he desrves the
    Cy Young, hands down.
    
    But because he is Roger Clemens and because he has an "attitude", some
    will never appreciate what this guy has done this year.
    
    Oh, by the way, how many 1-0 games has Clemens won or lost this year?
    
    Rich
    
29.1932NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 02 1992 20:428
    
    > Oh, by the way, how many 1-0 games has Clemens won or lost this year?
    
    I think he's won one (two-hitter against Minnesota and Scott Erickson), 
    lost none.
    
    glenn
    
29.1933MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Sep 03 1992 12:5110
    
    Roger wins!  Roger wins!  Now tops in the league in major pitching
    statistics! ("wins" is a minor category, since his performance
    had nothing to do with a few of his losses.)  He should have 5 starts
    left, 6 if they pitch him every fifth day, not every fifth game.  The
    quest for the Cy is about the only thing about the Sox worth caring
    about.  How about that.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1934Okay, how many 2-0 games has Roger lost this year?AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismThu Sep 03 1992 13:061
    
29.1935CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Sep 03 1992 13:1421
Well the one thing you guys are proving is my theory that Sox fans don't care
about the team as long as one of the players brings home some sort of
trophy.

If Roger Clemens was 0-20, the Sox would be in last place.  Guess what.  They are
still in last place.  Big f'ing deal.

I recall one year (was it 86?) that old Roger had unreal run support.  I don't
remember any of you dudes whining about it then.

As I've said before.  Roger has never strapped a team on his back to a
champeenship - things Frank Voila, Orel, and Morris have  all done.  Heck
Bruce Hurst almost did it as a Sox.

Ah yes "We finished last.  Who cares, Rocket won the Cy - wicked pisser awesome!"

BTW, to Rich Brake.   If Roger pitched for any of the teams you mentioned - he
wouldn't EVEN be CONSIDERED for the Cy Young.   And you can take that to the 
bank.

JD
29.1936I see that JD is back to drinking coffee again...AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismThu Sep 03 1992 13:231
    
29.1937SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Sep 03 1992 13:264
       Who said the Sox fans don't care about the team? I read where
    Dickstah said that seeing as how they're in last, all that's left to
    root for is the Cy! So what?
                                    Denny
29.1938RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Sep 03 1992 13:3270
    >>Well the one thing you guys are proving is my theory that Sox fans don't 
    >>care about the team as long as one of the players brings home some sort of
    >>trophy.
    
    Wrong, JD. You fail to collect the brass monkey. Don't you think Cubs
    fans were rooting for Andre Dawson to win the MVP while their team was
    going nowhere? 
    
    I'm surprised at you. You have lived through pennant races in Boston
    before and you know the enthusiasm it elicits. Winning the pennant is
    the most important thing to Sox fans. Hey, a Series cahmpeenship would
    be nice, too. 
    
    But, hey,. the team stinks and we have a legitimate HoF pitcher. There
    is nothing else to root foor, realistically. The Sox have no chance mto
    overtake the Brewers, let alone the Jays and O's. They don't treat the
    fans to exciting baseball by stealing bases. They don't put dents in
    the OF walls. They DO have one of the best pitchers of this era,
    though, and this pitcher is putting up pretty good numbers. He has a
    chance to win the Cy. 
    
    So, what is the crime in getting excited about this?
    
    >>I recall one year (was it 86?) that old Roger had unreal run support.  
    >>I don't remember any of you dudes whining about it then.
    
    What's your point? What was his ERA? 
    
    >>As I've said before.  Roger has never strapped a team on his back to a
    >>champeenship - things Frank Voila, Orel, and Morris have  all done.  Heck
    >>Bruce Hurst almost did it as a Sox.
    
    
    Well, JD, I guess you don't think very much of Bob Feller, huh? I guess
    a pitcher has to have played for a WS champ to get your seal of
    approval. 
    
    Heck, Lew Burdette won 3 WS games one year. Was he better then than
    Roger is today? Does Burdette deserve more recognition than Spahn
    because of this WS thang?
    
    The list you provided....I'll give you Morris. He was one of the few
    bright spots on the Tigers for years. He is there, year in and year
    out. But Orel? What has he done lately? Viola did, indeed, have a
    wonderful year with the Twins that year. Sort of like Jim Lonborg from
    '67.
    
    But, JD, would you really rather have Clemens or Lonborg? Not for one
    season but for a career. Clemens has put forth his numbers over a
    career in the smallest ballpark in baseball. 
    
    >>Ah yes "We finished last.  Who cares, Rocket won the Cy - wicked pisser 
    >>awesome!"
    
    Where do you see this? What paper was it in? I know you are being
    facetious but I think it really is a little ridiculous.
    
    >>BTW, to Rich Brake.   If Roger pitched for any of the teams you mentioned
    >> - he wouldn't EVEN be CONSIDERED for the Cy Young.   And you can take 
    >>that to the bank
    
    Well, JD, I obviously would invest in a bank you recommended. Clearly
    you think only players from major markets get notoriety. I guess I can
    live with the fact you have this bias and I won't try to change your
    mind. I'll only say, categorically, you are WRONG!
    
    Have a nice day.
    
    Rich
    
29.1939So sue me alreadyMCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Sep 03 1992 13:338
    
    So, what's so wrong about rooting for the home-town guy to excel and be
    chosen the best pitcher in the game?  Is it detrimental to my health
    or something?  Does it mean I don't care about the rest of the team?
    Nope.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1940JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 03 1992 13:3610
    >>BTW, to Rich Brake.   If Roger pitched for any of the teams you mentioned
    >> - he wouldn't EVEN be CONSIDERED for the Cy Young.   And you can take 
    >>that to the bank
    
    I'd maybe agree about the Mariners -- look where Edgar Martinez
    finished in the All-Star voting -- but not about the Angels or
    Phillies, they play in major markets (LA and Philly).
    
    
    py
29.1941Gits mighty boring in Wilton, eh JD?AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismThu Sep 03 1992 16:301
    
29.1942QETOO::TIMMONSThu Sep 03 1992 16:416
    Stirrin' the pot again, eh JD?  :*)
    
    Roger is a bum, pure and simple.  Trade the bum to, ahh, err, let's
    see,  Detroit.  Yeah, that's the ticket, Detroit.
    
    lEe
29.1943SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Sep 03 1992 16:504
       I hope you don't think I was picking on you Dickstah. I was asking
    JD what was wrong with your note. You certainly weren't being anti-team
    as JD says 'some' (though he doesn't say who) are.
                                             Denny
29.1944MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Sep 03 1992 17:2012
    
    >       I hope you don't think I was picking on you Dickstah. I was asking
    
    Not at all, Mr. Denny.
    
    My note in all fairness did say that Clemens' winning the Cy was the
    only thing about the Sox to care about.  A more apt choice of words
    might be "the only thing about the Sox worth getting excited about"
    at this point of the season.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.1945Can relateSHALOT::HUNTLast one out, hit the lightsThu Sep 03 1992 17:3620
 There's nothing inherently *wrong* in setting your sights on an individual
 player's award potential after your team has bagged it for the year.  I
 have years of experience in that department with the most famous example
 being Steve Carlton's 1972 season where he won 27 games with a 1.92 ERA
 and 300+ whiffs for the dead, deader, deadest lasted-placed Phils. 
 Believe me, he was the one and only reason to watch the Phillies try to
 play baseball that year.
 
 It's when your team was expected to do well and doesn't even come close
 that individual awards seem somehow less then extra special.   Clemens has
 had yet another monster season on the mound.  There isn't a GM in any
 league in the world who wouldn't give his left filbert to have Roger on
 his team.   He's easily the most valuable pitcher on the planet with the
 possible exception of a properly utilized Dennis Eckersley.
 
 But the BoSox have become the BoSux and even Roger's 4th Cy Young Award
 ... which would tie him with the afore-mentioned Mr Carlton ... will seem
 like very weak icing on a truly horrid cake.
 
 Bob Hunt
29.1946I predict that a team much better than the Red Sox wins it allNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 03 1992 17:4227
    
    Let's break this down to see if we can detect a pattern:
    
    1991-- Roger is good, but he's no Jack Morris.
    1990-- Roger is good, but he's no Jose Rijo (sidebar: what a choke
             artist that Dave Stewart is!).
    1989-- Roger is good, but he's no Dave Stewart.
    1988-- Roger is good, but he's no Orel Hershiser.
    1987-- Roger is good, but he's no Frank Viola.
    
    Hmmmm, what do we see?  It seems that every year an outstanding team 
    wins a championship, and that team usually features one outstanding 
    pitcher.  But every year this pitcher seems to be different, and in 
    some years today's goat was yesterday's hero!  Could it be that logic
    dictates that one team will win the World Series (with the aid of an
    ace pitcher), regardless of how high (1991) or how low (1989) the
    overall level of play might be?  Is it "clutch", or is it simply 
    inevitable that one team and its players must necessarily prevail?
    
    My challenge: who will be this year's postseason goats?  This year's
    hero?  What happens to past assumptions if Jack Morris gets shelled 
    this year?  And, who will be the next pitcher that Roger Clemens 
    can't hope to touch before quickly disappearing from baseball's 
    pinnacle?
    
    glenn
    
29.1947CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Sep 03 1992 17:4926
Before the season started, I said that Sox fans seem more interested in
'trophies' by individuals than a champeenship.  The usual cabal shouted
me down.  I said I could guarentee if the Sox were in the bag, that the cries
of 'so what, so and so will win the Cy Young, batting title, etc..."

Again, the cabal shouted me down.

History has borne me out.  I was correct.  The same cabal shouts me down
again.  Many of the same folks that I remember criticizing Andre Dawson's
selection as MVP (they would have finished out of it without him..) - the
same arguement is pooh-poohed by this almight and righteous cabal.

Yes, criticize other organizations.   Criticize other fans.  Other players.
Just don't touch the Sox or Roger.

And I'll repeat - this horrible season will be justified, and to some, be
considered a success, if Roger hauls in another trophy.

Regarding Rich Brake - Rich, give me a one year wonder that leads my team
to a champeenship over a multi-year chokes under pressure but gets the individual
stats and trophies ANY day of the week.  

iI'll take Bruce Hurst's 1986 Postseason (Esp. W.S.) pitching over anything
ROger >Clemens has ever done.

JD
29.1948RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Sep 03 1992 17:5513
    re .1945
    
    Excellent note, Bob. I guess, using JD's logic, Steve Carlton and the
    Philly fans aren't worth a hoot. I mean, obviously, Philly fans
    contented themselves with Left's heroics over the team. And, how many
    teams did Carlton "carry on his back" to a world championship?
    
    Heck, Carlton pitched in the '67 Series against the Red Sox and was
    outshined by Bob Gibson. So, clearly, Carlton was not really much of a
    pitcher "~).
    
    Rich
    
29.1949CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinThu Sep 03 1992 17:5724
Yeah, but doing that stuff JD, is natural.

I mean, if I were a fan of the St. Louis Brown's, I'm SURE that I would
have looked for something to cheer about, even if it was a pitcher
who was pitching really well.

There's not a Sox fan in here who'd RATHER have Roger win a Cy Young than
a championship.  But hey, I've seen championship teams and I can tell you
that these Red Sox are NOT a championship team.   So, we look for
other things to root for.


It's kind of like in a sporting match, if you're horrendously down, you
start working on things for next week.  (Like in rugby, if we're losing
by 40, then you kind of start trying out new things).

So maybe I watch to see who they bring up from Pawtucket or whatever.


Believe me, no one wants a champeenship more than a Sox fan.  But in that
abscence I can still root for Roger to win the Cy Young....


'Saw
29.1950One moreSALEM::DODAMA:Home of the IndictmentThu Sep 03 1992 18:095
Glenn,

Don't forget 1986 and Gooden comparison.

daryll
29.1951I just wanted 1950! (my birth year! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Sep 03 1992 18:101
    
29.1952rats! missed again! :*(CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Sep 03 1992 18:101
    
29.1953CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Sep 03 1992 18:2228
First, the fundamental flaw in Rich Brake's, and others, anti-JD comments are
that I have not said that Roger is an inferior pitcher, or a bad pitcher.  He's
a great pitcher.  Howwever, IMO, winning a Cy Young this year means nothing
to me as a Sox fan.  Nothing.  Nada.  

I'd rather have him go 10-10 but the Sox win the Series then him go 28-4 and
get another piece of hardware.

Only thing I can compare it to are the New York Football Giants.  Always a 
die hard fan - but as the 80's rolled around, I wanted a winner.  Not a 9-7
team.  But a Super Bowl winner.  I didn't care about individual awards, stats,
etc.  Sure, its nice to have top players.  But after 30 years of no champeenships
I was fed up (as were many Giants fans - who had done things like burn season
tickets, hire planes to circle the stadium...).   And the Giants produced 
a champeenship.  Everything after that was gravy (I.E. individual awards).

With Sox fans, it seems that instead of getting angry at the absolute undeniable
fact that it has been a damn LONG time since a champeenship banner was raised, -
they take solace in individual accomplishments, like Roger going for the Cy.

No, a team can't win a champeenship every year.  But once every 50 or so
years would be nice, no?

As for Darryl Doda - Gooden sucked in the 86 series, and I've never said otherwise.

So bark up another tree.

JD
29.1954Ring first, Individual secondCTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Sep 03 1992 18:3916
    Hey JD,
    Bark, bark, woof, snarl, grrrr. 8^),
    
    I don't think ANY Sox fan in here has stated that we prefer individual
    achievements over the Enchilada. When that Enchilada is obviously
    a meal for someone else, it's nice to follow someone's quest, however
    it pales to the Ultimate, for individual mastery in a lost season.
    Individual stats in the end, mean nothing in comparison to the Series,
    but it proves that said player is great at what he does. In the end
    Roger himself, as well as us, would tell ya the Cy's mean nothing,
    in comparison, to the Ring.  But in a game where comparison to your
    peers becomes important, I think a Cy Young for Roger is a worthy
    goal, albeit a subgoal.
    
    MikeL
    
29.1955SOLANA::MAY_BRI need a bambulanceThu Sep 03 1992 18:407
    
    OK, JD, show us one, just one, Sox fan who says they would rather have
    Roger win the Cy then the Sox win the WS.  Feel free to choose among
    the myriad of notesfiles or news reports you have available to you.  If
    you can find just one, maybe someone else will agree with you.
    
    Brews
29.1956CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinThu Sep 03 1992 18:4149
>IMO, winning a Cy Young this year means nothing
>to me as a Sox fan.  Nothing.  Nada.  

IMO, it doesn't come close to winning a champeenship, but it's only
natural that a fan who can't root for a championship will look at other
possible things to root for.  Nothing wrong with rooting for and hoping
that Rogers gets the Cy Young.


>I'd rather have him go 10-10 but the Sox win the Series then him go 28-4 and
>get another piece of hardware.

Ditto.  But that's kind of backwards.  We're not saying we'd rather have
Roger win the Cy  Young that get a series, rather that since we ain't gonna
win the Series, it'd be nice if we could see Roger get the Cy Young.


>Only thing I can compare it to are the New York Football Giants.  Always a 
>die hard fan - but as the 80's rolled around, I wanted a winner.  Not a 9-7
>team.  But a Super Bowl winner.  I didn't care about individual awards, stats,
>etc.  Sure, its nice to have top players.  But after 30 years of no champeenships
>I was fed up (as were many Giants fans - who had done things like burn season
>tickets, hire planes to circle the stadium...).   And the Giants produced 
>a champeenship.  Everything after that was gravy (I.E. individual awards).

Again, ditto.  

But through those years when they were playing at 3-11, or 3-12-1, or
worse, you'd try to find something good about the Giants.  Maybe it was
that they beat the Cowboys in one game.   I remember one year they beat
the Cowboys something like 16-7 (i think) and we danced around the living
room like I did years later when they won the Bowl.


The WORST season for me as a Giants fan was the 9-5 season where they
lost to the Ram 31-3 in the last game and miss the playoffs.  It was easier
for me to deal with 3-11 or 5-9, than in having them come so close....



No Sox fan would rather have Roger get the Cy Young instead of the team
get the Ring.....


'Saw




29.1957SALEM::DODAMA:Home of the IndictmentThu Sep 03 1992 18:4219
JD, show me where I attributed anything to you in my reply.

Fact: In 1986, the debate raged in here as to who the better 
pitcher was Gooden or Clemens. It fit in very well with Glenn's 
comparisons.

Clemens deserves the Cy Young based on HIS performance this year 
not the team's record. As a baseball fan, I'll be happy if he 
gets justifiably recognized by getting the Cy this year. (How 
convienently you sidestep the Carlton comparison.)

I'm glad you happen to have your finger on the pulse of the 
majority of Red Sox fans (in MA? the NE? the world?, who knows?).
Guess those of us in here that happen to disagree with you are 
the minority.

Take a pill.

daryll
29.1958SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Sep 03 1992 18:442
       Jd just likes yankin' chains, he won't (can't) back it up.
                                  Denny
29.1959CNTROL::CHILDSRoger Clemems, what a waste of disk spaceThu Sep 03 1992 19:009
 I think if the red soxs fan look deep inside they'd hasve to admit JD's right.
 They'd rather the individual award for Roger than a Championship. After all 
 first if the Soxs did win it all it would be a fluke, second people would be
 drunk for days, some might even jump out of windows. Red Soxs fan are of the
 kinda gentler variety and don't want to see anyone harm themselves...that's
 why they prefer the individual award......

 JD remember how proud they were when Rog won a Cy and Wadzie a BT????
29.1960Youse guys keep up this barking, and Hal will be here before you know it!CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadThu Sep 03 1992 19:000
29.1961CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Sep 03 1992 19:0123
It's basically inferences.  I dont' have the energy, nor the time, to go
through a few thousand notes in here, the Sox file, the Baseball file, or
through conversations with Sox fans while running 20 milers, at games, in
cars, on the phone, in airports, or hearing stuff on the radio.

I can let you guys go back to your Roger circle jerk.  

But I'll use the standard arguement that I know I've seen Mac and others
use when saying 'so and so doesn't deserve the MVP'?

Where would the Sox be without Roger Clemens?  Last Place.

For arguements sake, where would the Blue Jays be without Jack Morris (Hint,
not in 1st place.)

Where would the A's be without the Eck?

Or are you all too vain to admit that you are using double standards when
it comes to Roger?

Probably.  

JD
29.1962Roger Clemson is no two BLAM! :-)JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 03 1992 19:051
    
29.1963Then Morris/Eck deserve an MVP, not a CYSALEM::DODAMA:Home of the IndictmentThu Sep 03 1992 19:080
29.1964CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Sep 03 1992 19:0822
Mike -

I've often wondered if Sox fans have taken '1918' and besides from false
bravado - actually revel in the fact they've gone so long without a champeenship.
(And to keep the hounds at bay, I have the same wonderings about Cubs fans...)

It's like a badge of honour.  It helps with the aura of the team, the veneer
that is the Sox.  It fits in with the staid New England Yankee image.

And a Champeenship may frighten some.   Take some of the noteriety of going
70+ years with just a few sniffs of a real award, a real banner, a real trophy.

The Olde Towne Team - wiping out the legacy of 1918, and all that goes with
it (Harry Frazee and the Babe, Denny Galehouse, Enos Slaughter, Luis Aparachio
falling, Yaz' Triple Crown, Fisk's homor, Bucky Dent, Bill Buckner and Mookie)
- ripping the frabric out of the web that is essential to the 'real' Red
Sox fan.

All of those things would be pale memories of yesteryear if a  champeenship
flag waved over Fenway.

JD
29.1965CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Sep 03 1992 19:106
Darryl -

I believe the MVP should be for everyday players, and not once every 5 game
players.

JD
29.1966RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Sep 03 1992 19:1163
    >>First, the fundamental flaw in Rich Brake's, and others, anti-JD comments
    
    JD, first off, we have sparred in here on and off since at least 1986.
    Why all of a sudden do you need to refer to me as Rich Brake? I sign my
    notes "Rich". Seems we honor other noters by addressing them as they
    sign themselves (Dickstah, 'Saw, /Don, dan'l, etc)... so I ask please
    to refer to me as Rich.
    
    Secondly, after reading over my notes in this string, I realize that I
    was getting too aggresive towards you which is wrong. I apologize. I
    guess my notes etiquette suffers somewhat since I don't have the
    opportunity to note as much as I once did. Please accept my apologies.
    
    >>Howwever, IMO, winning a Cy Young this year means nothing
    >>to me as a Sox fan.  Nothing.  Nada.
    
    
    Anyone who mdisagrees with this is NOT a Red Sox fan. I don't care if
    nobody on the team hit a HR all year, if the team ERA is 10.95 and if
    the Sox didn't steal 1 base. If they won a championship, THAT would be
    the most important thing in the world to me vis a vis baseball.
    
    >>I'd rather have him go 10-10 but the Sox win the Series then him go 28-4 
    >>and get another piece of hardware.
    
    We are on the same wavelength here. Could not agree more
    
    JD, your comparison to the NY football Giants is good but doesn't come
    close to capturing the wait Red Sox fans have endured. I want a winner.
    'Saw wants a winner. Denny, Jeff and all other Sox fans in here want a
    winner. We want it more than a Triple Crown winner or Cy Young winner
    or any other kind of individual winner.
    
    >>With Sox fans, it seems that instead of getting angry at the absolute 
    >>undeniable fact that it has been a damn LONG time since a champeenship 
    >>banner was raised, - they take solace in individual accomplishments, like
    >>Roger going for the Cy.
    
    I'm angry, JD. I was angry at Zimmer, at Gorman. I was angry about the
    Danny Cater for Sparky Lyle trade. I was angry about using Bob Baily as
    a pinch hitter. I look at some of the inept managers - from Mike
    Higgins to Billy Jurges to Johnny Pesky to Billy Herman. I lived with
    this bunch through the 50's and early 60's. I felt a breath of fresh
    air with Dick O'Connell and Dick Williams. I soared with the fortunes
    of the team in '67 when they finally shed their losers image. I skipped
    freshman classes in the '67 WS to watch Santiago throw thye first WS
    pitch in Boston since 1946. Being there was MORE improtant than Yaz'
    Triple Crown. 
    
    I see where you are coming from but I just don't see where any of us
    Sox fans have indicated that a Cy for Roger is better than a
    championship banner for the team. I have heard outrage in here about
    Matt Young still being on the team. I've read about Jack Clark being
    useless. I've read about disgust at the inactivity of the front office.
    And, occasionally, in an effort to keep interest in the team alive,
    fans have pointed to the one bright spot on the team...a reason to tune
    in every 5th game for a glance at a professional. 
    
    Later,
    
    Rich
    
    
29.1967CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinThu Sep 03 1992 19:1614
JD,

As a Giants fan, winning the 1986 Super Bowl did not diminish the
angst of the years under Alex Webster, or the Fumble, or the
31-3 loss to the Rams and no playoff berth.

Quite the contrary.  Winning the Championship was like what winning the
marathon must be like after ALL of those hundreds (thousands?) of
miles in the heat, the rain, the snow, the humidity.   It heightens
the experience, brings them back to the front of your mind, and gives
them purpose.....

I'd rather have a Red Sox WS than anything.  But I wouldn't want to
be in the City if it happens.  Why the stampede alone would cause a quake....
29.1968ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Sep 03 1992 19:288
    Cy Young Award has always been for the best pitcher in the league and
    not for most valuable pitcher. The place where a pitchers team finishes
    should not have any real bearing on who wins the award. On the other
    hand MVP .. well the name of the award says it all and thus an argument
    can be made that a teams finish should be taken into account.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1969The award is irrelevant to actual achievement...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 03 1992 19:2822
                                                              
    For the record, I won't be upset if Roger Clemens doesn't win the Cy
    Young and Dennis Eckersley does.  I responded to JD's comments that it
    would be "a travesty" if he does.  That's far from not caring if Roger
    wins the award; it's taking a strong position against such a thought!  
    So who exactly is it that's pre-occupied with the possibility?  Once 
    again, the illogical position that rooting for a team and a player on 
    a team are mutually exclusive is proffered, and JD gets the reaction he 
    wants.  Yawn...
    
    The reason that I'm not too worried about the award is that Clemens is
    the same pitcher (I believe the undisputed best pitcher in baseball) 
    whether he wins it or not.  I enjoy watching him perform, regardless 
    of what some group of writers think of his performance in the abstract.
    
    And yes, as a Red Sox fan at this point in this lost season I am much
    more interested in their trade and free agent prospects for the
    off-season (damn I wish they'd packaged Frank Viola in a bid for
    Canseco!) than the awards banquet circuit...
    
    glenn
    
29.1970RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Sep 03 1992 19:3845
    Good theory about the secret wishes of Sox fans. That is, quiet
    consolation in being the fan of a perrenial also-ran. And, in a way,
    the fact the Sox drought has added to the lore of the team.
    
    But, unlike the Cubs, the Sox have come close. They took the Cards to 7
    games in '46 and '67. They took the mighty Reds to 7 games in '75 and
    the more powerful Mets to 7 in '86. 
    
    And, although I was not around in '46, I witnessed the heartbreaks of
    the last 3 Series the Sox were in. I would have given anything for a
    jubilant scene on the mound with Tiant or Hurst or Lonborg being
    carried around on the shoulders of the fans. 
    
    My pain was shared by millions of Sox fans. We, in no way wished for
    just another bridesmaid.
    
    Ask Mac if he can watch a replay of Buckner's error or Armbrister's
    failed bunt Yaz popping out to Nettles without wincing in anguish. Ask
    me or /Don how we feel about it. 
    
    I think the Sox fans in this file are fairly representative of most Sox
    fans. We are not takling heads from the Globe or Herald. We suffer with
    this team and continue to come back for more.
    
    Along the way we point with pride to the homers of Jimmy Foxx or the
    heroics of Joe Cronin or the masterful hitting of Ted Williams or the
    incredible year of Jackie Jensen or the antics of Jimmy Piersall. These
    are part of the fabric of the team we love. 
    
    But the team transcends individual accomplishments. Make no mistake
    about that. The glory of a championship remains as an eternal flame in
    each players' belly. A flame that never dies, that represents the
    heights of achievment. Unlike the medal pinned on the chest of the
    soldier of a losing army just before surrender. 
    
    I just am befuddled as to what is acceptable to some people. Should Sox
    fans ignore the fact that they have a great pitcher? Should we dwell on
    the fact that he did not walk on water in post season play, instead? 
    
    Would the Sox have made it to post season play without him? 
    
    Should, in fact, individual awards be abolished?
    
    Rich
    
29.1971NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 03 1992 19:4110
             
> I'd rather have a Red Sox WS than anything.  But I wouldn't want to
> be in the City if it happens.  Why the stampede alone would cause a quake....
    
    I *will* be there for that glorious day!  But until that time I'm not 
    going to cry and moan and bitch and wail but shut up and watch the
    game! ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.1972CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Sep 03 1992 20:2717
Rich -

Actually, I've always felt that individual accomplishment awards have no
place in team sports.  IMO, they place the individual above the team - and
that goes against everything I've every felt about being on a team.

Of all my awards I've ever received, a high school MVP award for cross-country
is the least revered.  Never displayed it because I was competing on a team
sport that fielded a 7-man team, with the top 5 counting in each meet's success.

The MVP's were the 7 who were on the team.   Because without them, the 
individual's efforts were nothing but massaging the ego.

Awards like Cy Young and MVP seem to be more to show off the collective
'wisdom' (or in some cases spite) of the baseball writers in this country.

JD
29.1973FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 03 1992 20:319
    I never have believed in individual awards, either, both for the main
    reason JD espouses as well as for the fact that they're too subjective
    with no standards applied consistently.
    
    Also in football, the quality of an individual's performance is
    affected by a lot of other factors - namely, the quality of the team
    the individual has around him.
    
    John
29.1974CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinThu Sep 03 1992 20:5129
>    I never have believed in individual awards, either, both for the main
>    reason JD espouses as well as for the fact that they're too subjective
>    with no standards applied consistently.
>    
>    Also in football, the quality of an individual's performance is
>    affected by a lot of other factors - namely, the quality of the team
>    the individual has around him.
    
I tend to agree with John in one sense, but disagree in another.

There are some individual awards that I like to see, like the 10th Man
in baseball, or the 6th man in hoops.   Someone who is not a starter
yet who fills the 10th man role well.

I also like the sportsmanship type awards.  All too often we forget that
the essence of sport is not winning.  Grantland Rice summed it up
very well:

	Nor victory, nor yet defeat,
	Is chalked against the player's name,
	But down the roll, the final scroll,
	show only how he played the game.



But MVP and stuff can be so subjective....


'Saw
29.1975FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 03 1992 21:0212
    'Saw, while I like the concept of the "10th player" or "the 6th man",
    very often (at least around here, for the Red Sox, Bruins and Celtics)
    it becomes more of a popularity contest than anything else.  These are
    put to fan votes.
    
    One of my objections to the Hall of Fame is that sportswriters vote for
    it and unfortunately, their view of an athlete is very often tainted by
    how that athlete was to deal with when he was active.  For example,
    I'll bet it costs Jim Rice some votes as he was a notoriously difficult
    interview.
    
    John
29.1976CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinThu Sep 03 1992 21:5926
>    One of my objections to the Hall of Fame is that sportswriters vote for
>    it and unfortunately, their view of an athlete is very often tainted by
>    how that athlete was to deal with when he was active.  For example,
>    I'll bet it costs Jim Rice some votes as he was a notoriously difficult
>    interview.
    

Yes, John, you're probably right.  I don't see any truly objective way
for some of these things.

One of the things I like is when a bunch of players will pick other players.


I might be wrong, and I know that Mac will correct me, but I believe the
All World Cup XV at the last Rugby World Cup was chosen by peers.  That
made American Kevin Swords selection as Captain of the All World Cup XV
even more special....

There will always be bias, but for the most part I'd go with a large
group of sportswriters (numbers should average out bias) or a group
of peers.

Fans are unconscinable dumb, as has been proven often....


'Saw
29.1977SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Fri Sep 04 1992 11:0919
    I like the Sigh Yung award, myself.  I don't see anything wrong with
    presenting such an award to a pitcher who has displayed his craft to
    where he is considered the best for that particular period of time.
    
    I also like the MVP, whereby a player is recognized for his
    contribution to his team.
    
    What I don't like is the selection process.  No, I don't have a better
    one in mind, but that doesn't take away the fact that I believe the
    award itself is a good thing.
    
    No, it doesn't take the place of a WS ring, or even a league
    championship.  But, for me, I do take some pleasure in Cecil Fielder's
    run at the RBI title.  As a Tiger fan, what else do I have to look
    forward to?  So what if we finish above Cleveland, Boston and the
    Yamkees?  We're still mired way down in the division, so I'll take my
    pleasure where I find it.
    
    Lee
29.1978AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Sep 04 1992 12:0213
29.1979CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinFri Sep 04 1992 12:2723
29.1980HAHAHA Bobby Duhon and Tucker FredericksonCTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Fri Sep 04 1992 13:321
    
29.1981CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinFri Sep 04 1992 13:4514
>                -< HAHAHA Bobby Duhon and Tucker Frederickson >-


Hey!

Bobby Duhon is daid I think.  And Tucker runs a chain of Health Spas....


Don't be blastin' them old Giants, unless you wanna blast Leon Not-So Bright.


'Saw
    

29.1982CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Fri Sep 04 1992 14:137
    Hey 'Saw!
    I was a Jints fan in me childhood, ya know, the Tittles, Giffords,
    Morrisons, Shofners, etc. When Ma voice started crackin' I followed
    the Patsies 'cuz by that time, the Jints had brought in Fran da Weasel.
    
    MikeL
    
29.19831970 GiantsSALES::THILLFri Sep 04 1992 14:1613
    I remember the 31-3 game well. The previous week the Jints beat the
    Skins on a late long TD pass from Tarkenton. Mary Glickman, the Giants 
    radio guy damn near fell outa the booth!
    
    The Rams were pretty good that year, I think they won their Division.
    (Caint remember if the 49ers won that year or the nexted). Roman Gabriel 
    was their QB, and that was when the Rams had the white horn on their
    helmet instead of the gold one now. It wasn't as if they got whupped by a 
    chump team, but it still hurt pretty bad...
    
    Always liked Spider Lockhert and Homer Jones... 
    
    Tom
29.1984CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinFri Sep 04 1992 14:3213
>    The Rams were pretty good that year, I think they won their Division.
>    (Caint remember if the 49ers won that year or the nexted). Roman Gabriel 
>    was their QB, and that was when the Rams had the white horn on their
>    helmet instead of the gold one now. It wasn't as if they got whupped by a 
>    chump team, but it still hurt pretty bad...
    
Yeah, back then their colors were white/blue.  

They were pretty good, but I thought the Giants could beat them....8^(


;^)
'Saw
29.1985AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Sep 04 1992 14:423
    	You can't mention the 1970 'Jints without mentioning Ron Johnson.
    
    				/Don
29.1986RDOVAX::BRAKEFri Sep 04 1992 15:4231
    re Giants.
    
    The Giants were the first team I rooted for. I'm afraid I go back a
    little further. Yes, Gifford was there but the trademark of the team I
    followed was the defense. The line of Dick Moduleski, Jim Katkavage and
    Andy Robistelli with Rosevelt Brown and Jimmy Patton and Sam Huff. Of
    course, #42 Charley Connerly was throwing to Kyle Rote and handing off
    to Mell Triplett and Alex Webster. And the Giff was a youngster then.
    
    re Awards.
    
    I tend to agree with John and JD - awards like the Cy Young and MVP are
    simply too subjective and there is NO way to change this. For instance,
    is Eckersly more valuable for saving over 40 games? But, how many of
    those saves were amassed by coming into a game with the A's up by 3 in
    the 9th? There is no way to minimize the Eck's accomplishments but at
    the sake of ignoring McDowell, Brown or Clemens? Or even Morris, for
    that matter.
    
    I think an award should be given for the best reliever which would be
    based on an algorithm which is made up of saves, ERA, # of inherited
    runners who scored and, perhaps, opponents BA.
    
    In addition, perhaps an award for starting pitcher based on wins, ERA,
    opponents BA, strikeouts to walks ratio and such.
    
    It seems a shame for some guys like Eck and Clemens to possibly not get
    a major award after dominating a particular phase of pitching all year.
    
    Rich
    
29.1987AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Sep 04 1992 16:115
    	Yeah, saying that Clemens winning the Cy Young is a "travesty"
    is a bit severe.  It's not like it would be a real travesty, like
    if say Phil Simms were elected to the Football Hall Of Fame.
    
    				/Don
29.1988ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Sep 04 1992 16:1812
    The formula used for the Rolaids Relief Award (or wahtever it's called
    these days) is pretty good. Once they started including losses and
    blown saves in the formula it becam pretty accurate.
    
    There is something to be said for an award like Cy Young or MVP that is
    not based on a formula. It allows for someone to win not solely on
    statistical accomplishment. Sure I still think that the sportswriters
    robbed (more like grand larceny) Strawberry of the MVP award in 1988,
    but it is tough to argue that Gibson had absolutely no claim on it.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1989NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 04 1992 16:3711
    
    > Sure I still think that the sportswriters
    > robbed (more like grand larceny) Strawberry of the MVP award in 1988,
    > but it is tough to argue that Gibson had absolutely no claim on it.
      
    It's even tougher to dispute that Orel Hershiser wasn't the most
    valuable, best, most dominating, or whatever-other-platitude-you-want-
    to-use baseball player on the planet that year...
    
    glenn
                              
29.1990ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Sep 04 1992 18:257
    Not sure I agree about Hershiser. He had a phenomnal last
    AUgust/September but his April-July was good but not unconscious.
    Hershiser was certainly not in the top 3 of the voting that year, since
    first 3 were Gibson, Strawberry, McReynolds.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1991CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Sep 04 1992 19:067
All Orel did was something that another great pitcher that plays in Boston
has yet to do - strap a contending team on his back and carry them to 
a champeenship with super, fantastic, basically flawless pitching performances
in the pressure cooker of a pennant race, champeenship series and the World
Series.    that other guy does it when the team is in last place `/~

JD
29.1992CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinFri Sep 04 1992 19:117
>All Orel did was something that another great pitcher that plays in Boston
>has yet to do - strap a contending team on his back and carry them to 
>a champeenship with super, fantastic, basically flawless pitching performances
>in the pressure cooker of a pennant race, champeenship series and the World
>Series.    that other guy does it when the team is in last place `/~

Gee, I didn't know that Orel could score runs from the pitcher's mound....8^)
29.1993Like you've told me, Roger had no chance 'gainst the awesome MetsNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 04 1992 19:2412
    Knock it off, JD.  Roger "strapped it on" in 1986 and you darn well
    know it (no Roger, no division, no pennant, no... er, heartbreak).  
    It's just that he and the Red Sox "ran into a better team" in the
    Series [the previous opinion is generously offered to New York Mets 
    fans who love to complain that Red Sox fans don't give the 1986 Mets
    the credit they so richly deserve].
    
    ;-) ;-)
    
    glenn
     
29.1994RDOVAX::BRAKEFri Sep 04 1992 19:5230
    Sorry, JD, but I think you continue to bark up the wrong tree on this
    analagy. 
    
    Agreed, Hershiser did carry that woeful bunch of Dodgers to a
    championship. Without him, they would not have won.
    
    However, in '86, I doubt a pitching staff of Hurst, Boyd and (???)
    would have even made it to the post season. Hurst, if I recall, had a
    decnr year in '86. Yet, I would not call him the go-to guy in every
    critical series the Sox were in.
    
    I think Roger led the league in innings pitched in '86 as well as in
    shutouts. I may be wrong on this but I think it is valid. I recall the
    last week in the season, Clemens being hit somewhere on his body by a
    line drive that caused much concern. It was felt the Sox didn't have a
    snowballs' chance of anything without Clemens. Point is, Clemens was
    the pitching heart and sole of that team.
    
    I do also want to go back to other pitchers that have been discussed
    before. Pitchers like Herb Score, Bob Feller, Steve Carlton, Robin
    Roberts, Warren Spahn, Juan Marichal, Billy Pierce, Jim Bunning...
    
    All pretty good pitchers. Some in the HoF. And none of them are known
    for post season heroics. 
    
    Could it be that these guys pitched so hard to get their team in
    contention that they were blown out come October?
    
    Rich
    
29.1995More on LeftySHALOT::HUNTNo, Daddy, I glued them on the fish!Fri Sep 04 1992 20:0126
29.1996Roger Clemens is the best bar noneESKIMO::GARRYDALLAS COWBOYS ARE BACKFri Sep 04 1992 20:1610
    Re. JD
    
    Orel did not win 4 games in the series which it takes to win right,
    last time I checked it was 4 of 7......He knocked in zero runs in 
    the series so the best he did was tie every game at best 0-0.
    To win the big one it takse a TEAM effort.....if you don't realize
    that then you need to read up on sports...this isn't track and field
    where you can win alone its a team sport...
    
    Tom
29.1997Circumstances have always separated many of the greats...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 04 1992 20:2129
    Yeah, Bob, but you've also got to admit that Lefty had some dud
    seasons, too.  In my mind the only reason he was not considered to be
    quite as great a pitcher in his time as Tom Seaver was his consistency. 
    Remember the big run-in he had with that clown Bill Conlan (now semi-
    famous for his appearances on the ESPN Sportwriters program) that
    precipitated his clamming up for the rest of his career?  The whole
    thing started because Conlan wrote that Carlton came into the 1973
    season off his historic 1972 cocky, fat and out of shape.  And indeed,
    Carlton proceeded to double his ERA and lose 20 games with a winning
    percentage below that of the rest of his team (in stark contrast to the
    previous season, the rest of the team improved greatly but Carlton
    regressed).
    
    The point?  Not that Carlton isn't a HOF pitcher, there's no question
    about that, but rather than the mind tends to color the past in a
    positive way, glossing over the failures and celebrating the successes.
    I think that's what many of the modern players are up against when
    compared with their predecessors.  For a guy like Clemens I'm rooting
    hard that he gets his ring (hey, he's got nothing to prove to me), 
    because he's given it 100% every year since he's been in the league, 
    without a *single season* where he hasn't been stellar, much less only
    average or slightly better.  There's no question in my mind that if you
    can make such a judgment (we all know too well that life doesn't
    promise to be fair), Clemens has earned and deserves an even shot
    at that ring...
    
    glenn
    
29.1998ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Sep 04 1992 20:329
    re: Hershiser
    
    Not clear the Dodgers get to the NLCS if Gibson is not on the team,
    ditto Mets with Strawberry. In the NLCS Hershiser pitched a brilliant
    game 7, and got out McReynolds in game 4. But he started both games 1
    and 3 and the mets won those 2 games.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.1999MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedTue Sep 08 1992 12:289
    
    Roger wins!  Roger wins!  Seven in a row!  Eight innings shutout, 3-hit
    ball.  9 K's.  His 18th win.  ERA lowered to 2.18.  192 K's for the 
    year.  It's a 2-horse race between Roger and Eck for the Cy, now. 
    Naturally, Roger should win when you compare the stats of a starter
    against a mere reliever.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2000MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedTue Sep 08 1992 12:305
    
    Oh, by the way, Roger defeated some old guy for the Rangers.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2001Good dule for 7 innings.HYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoTue Sep 08 1992 12:305
    
    Dickstah, I don't think that's 7 in a row..  didn't he get smacked
    around a couple of outtings ago?   
    
    /Jeff
29.2002SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Sep 08 1992 12:342
       I think he meant 7 strikeouts in a row.
                                 Denny
29.2003MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedTue Sep 08 1992 13:427
    
    Actually, I thought the guy on the radio meant 7 wins, but I guess it
    must've been the K's he was talking about.  What do I know, I was
    struck dumb and blinded by the magnificence of His Majesty's pitching.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2004Da bum...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 08 1992 15:2511
    
    > Actually, I thought the guy on the radio meant 7 wins, but I guess it
    > must've been the K's he was talking about.  What do I know, I was
    > struck dumb and blinded by the magnificence of His Majesty's pitching.
    
    He has won 8 of his last 9, with Mike Leary and I having the privilege
    of seeing the loss...  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
             
29.2005PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 08 1992 16:5745
29.2006PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 08 1992 17:5818
29.2007PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 08 1992 18:0310
29.2008PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 08 1992 18:0713
29.2009PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 08 1992 18:176
29.2010Mac - Read for once - and comprehend, if possibleCUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Sep 11 1992 17:117
    Mac -
    
    Wake up on the wrong side of the bed again?
    
    One too many head-ons in practice?
    
    JD
29.2011PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 11 1992 17:403
    JD,
    
    Apparently I wasn't the only one to interpret your comments as I did.
29.2012USCTR1::NAHEARNFri Sep 11 1992 19:1510
    I read and interpreted them the same as you did, Mac!!
    
    
    And to spare you the time it'd take to reply, JD......
    
    "I don't give a ^%#&* what you think, Nelly!!"
    
    
    
    Nelly
29.2013Bye-bye CyMCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedSun Sep 13 1992 11:4012
    
    Roger loses!  Roger loses!  Stock market plummets!  Astronomers report
    a misallignment of planets!  Record cold grips the nether world! 
    Neitche says, "Clemens is dead."
    
    Me, I was going to jump off the Tobin Bridge, but the line was too
    long.  Oh, the humanity!  Instead I'm going up to the Prudential
    Building with a high-powered rifle.  Actually, all I have is a 12-guage
    and some birdshot, but it might make me feel better anyway.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2014Go for it, Dickstah!NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 14 1992 13:299
    
    > Me, I was going to jump off the Tobin Bridge, but the line was too
    > long.  Oh, the humanity!  Instead I'm going up to the Prudential
    > Building with a high-powered rifle.
    
    I think you can reach the ballpark from there...
    
    glenn
    
29.2015CAMONE::WAYFeed My FrankensteinMon Sep 14 1992 14:0215
|    > Building with a high-powered rifle.
|    
|    I think you can reach the ballpark from there...
    

Reminds me of something a standup comic said the other night:


	I was really enjoying the New Kids on the Block concert.
	I was really enjoying watching them, until security took
	away my high powered rifle....


'Saw    

29.2016ROYALT::ASHEI think ya hear me knockin'Mon Sep 14 1992 15:153
    What did you guys expect... they were playing da Tigers... 
    
    -Walt (who was there even if the rest of Tigermania wasn't)
29.2017ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Sep 15 1992 22:207
    re: Cy Young
    
    Don't rule out Guzman, 14-3 and doing well since coming back. Few more
    starts and he could be in the 18-3 range.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2018PFSVAX::JACOBWhen did MassPike go '65'???Wed Sep 16 1992 12:0310
    Roger Clemens in today's Globe:
    
    
    "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH"
    
    
    Schnort Schit Schleps
    
    JaKe
    
29.2019CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Sep 16 1992 12:333
Ah yes, Roger and Wade, two guys with egos bigger than Iris Chacon's butt.

JD
29.2020CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttWed Sep 16 1992 12:3514
>Ah yes, Roger and Wade, two guys with egos bigger than Iris Chacon's butt.
                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

FINALLY.  Finally, finally, finally!!!!!

SPORTS is beginning to remind of SPORTS again.


Thanks JD. Man, you made my day!


'Saw

PS  Do monkies ever fly out of Iris Chacon's butt?
29.2021here's the poop....CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Sep 16 1992 12:3819
    For those not in the know, the story is that on Saturday, Wade was
    officially charged with an error.  After the game, he spent 1/2 hour
    with the official scorekeeper, beraiting him and insisting that it
    wasn't REALLY an error and it should have been classified a hit.
    
    I suppose he wore the guy down enough to change the card.  This
    resulted in Roger being held responsible for 2 runs.  This raised
    his ERA a couple of points and that now makes his Cy Young highly
    improbable.
    
    Roger's supposedly claiming Wade's not a team player!
    
    hth
    
    I remain,
    a_fill_in_the_blanks_kinda_guy!
    
    Kev
    
29.2022FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 16 1992 12:433
    Makes me glad I don't have the baseball official scoring job ....
    
    John
29.2023"what kinda Girls do you think we are?"CNTROL::CHILDSQue es un selfisho uno, Rogie a Wadie?Wed Sep 16 1992 12:4810
 Loved it when I opened up the paper this morning to those headlines hahahahaa

 I love the shot Rogie threw at Wade about sitting on his duff winning the
 batting crown while he, his Highness was out there mowing down Molitor and
 Mattingly for Wade's sake...

 and then I listen to "the Mothers - Fillmore East 1971 on my way in.....

 it's a great day so far
29.2024Is it hockey season yet?SHARE::DERRYBush: vegetable or noxious weed?Wed Sep 16 1992 13:026
Chuck was talking to Bob Lobel (ack) thised morning, asking him about which
side he's on... and they got around to the exorcism, held on the 24th for those
interested, and perhaps offering a human sacrifice and Lobel says, "I think we 
should sacrifice the guy who has never sacrificed anything."

Guess we know which side Bob's kissin'.
29.2025I don't think Wade's going to win this one...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 16 1992 13:2129
    This is great stuff!  How else can the Red Sox continue to be at the
    very top of the sports page when there's no on-field action worth
    reporting?  The more negative publicity, the worse the finish, the
    greater the impetus for change.  There can be no denial on Yawkey Way
    in the winter of 1992-93...
    
    Clemens would have been well-advised to keep his mouth shut.  Danny
    Darwin was handling Boggs' selfishness quite nicely for the team
    without him.  In any case, either side of the argument is only about 
    statistical measurement (it's the same play, and a poor start by 
    Clemens and a poor play by Boggs, no matter what the official scorer 
    says), and not about actual performance.  Clemens' performance doesn't 
    need any amplification.
    
    I was also at the game and initially scored the play a hit in my
    scorecard when I saw it (after muttering something unprintable about
    Boggs' fading reflexes).  Not because Boggs couldn't have made the 
    play, but because it wasn't hit right at him and he didn't react.  You 
    can argue the merits of such a system, but those kinds of plays are 
    ruled hits 95% of the time in practice.  I suspect that the scorer was 
    consciously or subconsciously protecting Clemens in the first place.
    
    As for Boggs, he appears to be doing whatever is necessary to guarantee
    him the fewest number of options and the absolute minimum dollar value
    for his services next year...
    
    glenn
    
29.2026CNTROL::CHILDSQue es un selfisho uno, Rogie a Wadie?Wed Sep 16 1992 13:302
I'm confused KBD, what sacrfices has either of them made?
29.2027PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 16 1992 13:364
29.2028This is the Red Sox, after all...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 16 1992 13:4311
29.2029MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrWed Sep 16 1992 14:1518

     Wade Boggs is selfish ?!??! I don't believe it ! I refuse to believe 
    it ! I won't believe it ! Tell me Whoopi Goldberg is a former Miss 
    America, tell me that Richard Simmons works part-time as a bouncer at
    a biker bar but DON'T try and tell me Wade Boggs is selfish. Not the
    Wade Boggs who just a couple of weeks ago said, "Even Helen Keller
    or Ray Charles could see that I'm struggling." Not that Wade Boggs.
    Not the Wade Boggs who when asked about Larry Bird's retirement immed-
    iately drew comparisons to himself. No way. I'm not buying it. Say it 
    ain't so, Joe please say it ain't so. That's not what I want to hear,
    Joe and I've got a right to know. Wade can't be selfish. It's just not in 
    his blood. We're talking about a guy who whenever he passes a beggar 
    says, "Spare change ? No, sorry I haven't got any spare change all I've
    got are these here hundreds." and then he walks a way laughing because
    he knows he at least tried to help. Nope, I'd sooner believe that Uncle
    Ken is going to stage a comeback than believe that Wade is selfish.
    
29.2030MKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Wed Sep 16 1992 14:265
	re -1

	no sarcasm there   ;^)

	Bill
29.2031Ya had to be there, I guess.SHARE::DERRYBush: vegetable or noxious weed?Wed Sep 16 1992 14:284
>I'm confused KBD, what sacrfices has either of them made?
    
None.  I guess the point Lobel was making was that Boggs would rather
try for a hit than sacrifice.  
29.2032CNTROL::CHILDSQue es un selfisho uno, Rogie a Wadie?Wed Sep 16 1992 14:328
> None.  I guess the point Lobel was making was that Boggs would rather
> try for a hit than sacrifice.  

 Well a sacrifice doesn't count as a time at bat so I would think Wade would
 try a sacrifice seeing it wouldn't hurt his precious average. Then again it
 would help the team so.......

 mc
29.2033It's been a hell of a show, Wade, don't let the door hit ya...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 16 1992 14:4115
       
    >  Not the
    >  Wade Boggs who just a couple of weeks ago said, "Even Helen Keller
    >  or Ray Charles could see that I'm struggling."
    
    Hey, that was a great line!  I choked on my lunch when I read that
    Wade had actually said that.  You must understand that superseding the 
    selfishness, the man is a bizarre human being first, with a total and 
    complete self-absorption that does not even entertain the notion that 
    others might judge him and act on what he says or does.  But it makes 
    for great copy, and the scribes in this town will sorely miss him when 
    he's gone...
    
    glenn
    
29.2034<insert clever smiley here>PFSVAX::JACOBIf I only had a bulldozerWed Sep 16 1992 14:5011
    
    >  Not the
    >  Wade Boggs who just a couple of weeks ago said, "Even Helen Keller
    >  or Ray Charles could see that I'm struggling."
    
    I think the above statements just serve to show that Mr. Boggs DOES NOT
    practice the valuing differences philosophy and uses blind people as
    the brunt of his jokes.
    
    JaKe
    
29.2035ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Sep 16 1992 16:413
    Thank you for .2029!!
    
    The Crazy Met
29.2036With a bullet...a bullet..CUBIC7::DIGGINSFolly Yurken?Wed Sep 16 1992 17:007
Hey Mike,

Go take a ride on the electric cooled pony harness with fuel injection...
fuel injection...

8^))))))))
29.2037FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 16 1992 17:056
    Seeing this entire brouhaha between Boggs, Clemens and Scoggins makes
    me really happy I work in pro football where the players never
    complain, the coaches seldom complain and I never hear from fantasy
    players since no one knows the rules anyway.
    
    John
29.2038The scorer always comes out with the upper hand in these things...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 16 1992 17:1011
    > Seeing this entire brouhaha between Boggs, Clemens and Scoggins makes
    > me really happy I work in pro football where the players never
    > complain, the coaches seldom complain and I never hear from fantasy
    > players since no one knows the rules anyway.
    
    I dunno, John, you'd be famous!  (Scoggins already was well known as a
    longtime scorer for the Red Sox.)
    
    glenn
    
29.2039It's that time of year again.....CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Sep 16 1992 17:18100
    NOTE:  Updated since the original....


    STAGE:   Somewhere on the Mass Turnpike.   A long, king-of-the-road,
    touring bus, with tinted windows, and gothic paintings on the side
    hurtles down the freeway - flashing its lights at any import or
    domestic that dares to get in its way.  It blares its horn at trucks,
    which obediently get out of the way.  State troopers look the other way,
    knowing that they can do nothing to stop this rambling vehicle.
    
    It cruises past Sturbridge and Westborough - causing folks to feel a
    strange coolness sweep their body.  Those foolhearty to stare at the
    riveted behemoth get a glimpse of the destination sign:
    
         "EXPRESS:  FENWAY PARK"
    
    It rampages steadily, always heading east.  And folks in towns it
    hurtles by swear they hear orchestral strains and the sounds of a diva
    warming up "LA LA LA_LA_LA_LA_LA_LAAAAAAAAA"
    
    The crescendo gets louder the closer to Landsdowne street it gets.  At
    the Natick tollbooths, the bus flashes its lights, blares its horns,
    and the booth collector only gets a glimpse of the driver.  He looks
    vaguely familiar, a rotund man, with 'Babe' stitched across his breast
    pocket.   A faded poster for the opening of "No No Nanette" can barely
    be seen through the windows.
    
    Inside the bus, a fever pitch is developing.  The star is still warming
    up - exercising her sizable lungs.  Her manager, Bucky, jokes with
    Enos, the wardrobe man, and Bill, the accountant.  "Love Beantown,"
    Bucky guffaws..."It's the one steady gig this chic has - nothing after
    this til we hit Madison Square in May! Haw!" 
    "LALALALALALAAAAALADEEDAAAAAAA!!!!!!!" the lady bellows.
    
    The bus rolls through the outlying 'burbs of Boston - like a metal
    apocalyptic horseman.  Grandfathers suddenly sit straight up and say
    "Throw the Ball!  Throw the Ball!  He can't score from FIRST!!!"
    Their sons and daughters scream "Get up Luis, GET UP!"   Their sons and
    daughters cry "Jim Willoughby!"  and their children spit up and wet
    their beds, chanting 'One Strike AWAY! One strike!'
    
    
    A shrill laughter fills the night, as the bus of doom slams into
    Beantown.  In the corporate offices, the owners feel the presence
    of the husband and wife team that guided the team for so long - 
    their mournful cries send shivers down their necks - he glances at
    the calendar - SEPTEMBER - and he realizes the Lady isn't even 
    waiting til October this time....

    In Kenmore Square, everything moves at a slower speed.  A dark cloud
    obscures the stars.  No animals move, rats and pigeons stay holed up until
    the inevitable passes.   The faithful file in, feeling strangely
    germanic and lethargic.  In the clubhouse, the Ol' Towne Team wears a
    collective grimace.  
    
    The Bus hurtles down Beacon Street, the noise too much for people to
    take.  The lady keeps warming up, the bus driver blares his horn.  The
    road crew opens the windows to laugh at the cowering masses "Poor
    schmucks" Bucky roars.....A chant that sounds like "Eupheus, Eupheus"
    can be heard....a cruel mocking chant.  
    
    Those with strong stomachs see the vanity license plate "1918" 
    A block from the destination, Babe starts laughing, "Hey guys - those
    spirits are going to try to stop us again - Won't those poor souls
    EVER learn!!!"  A ghostly collection of ex-Sox and fans form a human
    chain, trying to stop the bus - but they freeze when they see the 
    name of the bus, emblazoned in Yankee Blue - "Frazee"
    
    The bus rolls right over a sausage vendor.  The doors open.  The
    entourage gets out, slowly rolling a red carpet, which fits right
    through the legs of Bill.  The star slowly steps down, with
    a Toronto batting helmet on, a Genuine Bill Buckner autographed glove,
    Enos Slaughter's spikes, and a variety of other articles of clothing.
    
    Inside the park, the announcer asks everyone "To Please Stand...."
    But just as the strains of the National Anthem are about to start, a
    huge booming of drums cuts it off.  The lights in the stadium dim.  A 
    spotlight hits the top of the Green Monster, and 36,000 souls gasp -
    the
    FAT LADY has arrived....She belts out one last LALALALAAAAALADEEEDA...
    The glass protecting the 600 Club cracks.....
    
      And to the tune of the "Hallelujah Chorus", she belts out this year's 
      rendition ....
    
    
      "OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER, FORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOXFORTHEREDSOX
       OH ITS ALL OVER NOW, ALL OVER,
       WAITTILNEXTYEARWAITTILNEXTYEARWAAAIIITTTTIL NEXT YEAR..."
    
    From Bar Harbour to Winter Haven, Provincetown to Great Barrington, 
    the faded hats with the "B" are placed away for another winter.  
    When the Fat Lady finishes singing, a small fire starts burning in the 
    hearts of the faithful.  The fire of eternal hope, mixed with the embers 
    of despair...another ride on the Red Sox Ferris Wheel has lurched to a
    stop...and once again, the Sox fan is stuck near the top.  The only
    solace one can take is to peer up at the seats stuck just above -
    the one with those two guys from Chicago....
    
    JD
29.2040USCTR1::NAHEARNWed Sep 16 1992 17:219
    So far as I'm aware, there is no documented PROOF that Wade Boggs EVER
    had the conversation with the beggar that Tom Brydie alluded to!!!!!!
    
    
    
    HTH,
    
    
    Nelly
29.2041And we air our dirty laundryCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Sep 16 1992 17:427
    Gotsta admit JD, younze consistent.
    
    As the refrain goes, " Kick 'em when they're up, kick 'em when they're
                           down."
    
    MikeL
    
29.2042FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Sep 16 1992 17:457
    Glenn, while I appreciate your feeling I'd be famous, to tell you the
    truth I wouldn't really want it.  I actually prefer my relatively low
    profile.  All of you in notes, my family, my work group and a lot of my
    friends know about my job but I certainly would never want to be better
    known than that.
    
    John
29.2043Good oneSHALOT::HUNTNo, Daddy, I glued them on the fish!Wed Sep 16 1992 17:475
 Funny stuff, JD.   Got a rendition for the Phillies ???
 
 Bob Hunt
 
 P.S.  And it looks like Handley's Jints might need one soon, too.  ;-)
29.2044CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Sep 16 1992 17:498
    JD,
    
    Ya main enuff to cross post that littel gem in the ::Sox conference?
    
    btw - once again t'was an excellent note!
    
    Kev
    
29.2045PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 16 1992 18:265
29.2046"I hear that train a comin'..."MKFSA::LONGCarpe diem.Wed Sep 16 1992 18:308
re:.2039

	JD

	Where do you guys come up with this stuff?  That is hilarious!


	Bill
29.2047He did it in ::Sox!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Sep 16 1992 18:319
    JD,
    
    'pologize for my littel remark.  I've just seen where you posted that
    little gem in ::Sox at 1:30PM, about 12 minutes before I replied here.
    
    Yer a mainly kinda main!
    
    Kev
    
29.2048NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 16 1992 18:418
    
    I don't think there'd be any kind of strenuous objection to that piece
    in the Sox file.  It's good stuff, and in one way or another it does 
    represent the frustration that all Sox fans feel, however they respond
    to it.  All those terrible things did happen!
    
    glenn
    
29.2049MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Sep 17 1992 13:398
    
    Interesting game lasted night in a quirky way.  Sox-Brewers going 15
    innings.  Sox, 11 hits, Brews, 10 hits.  All singles. What a slugfest,
    eh?  Sox win 2-1, each team scoring a run on a safety squeeze,
    including the game winner.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2050MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Sep 17 1992 13:459
     Apparently Copernicus was wrong the planets actually orbit around
    Wade...
    
    
    
     " I don't see where I did anything wrong."
    
                   _Wade Boggs on the now famous "Was it a hit or an error"
                    controversy.
29.2051PFSVAX::JACOBIf I only had a bulldozerThu Sep 17 1992 13:518
    
    >>eh?  Sox win 2-1, each team scoring a run on a safety squeeze,
    
    What's a safety squeeze, is that when you don't know whether it's gas
    or substance, and you proceed with extreme caution??
    
    JaKe
    
29.2052CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttThu Sep 17 1992 13:5714
>    What's a safety squeeze, is that when you don't know whether it's gas


Bases loaded, you lay down a bunt to the first base side.  

The Suicide Squeeze is bases loaded, you lay down a bunt to the third
base side. 

I guess that rationale is that on the safety, the ball is going away
from the incoming runner....


'Saw    

29.2053CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadThu Sep 17 1992 14:097
29.2054JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 17 1992 14:1410
    re the play that stirred the Boggs/Clemens "controversy":
    
    I finally saw it on ESPN last night.  Didn't appear that Boggs even
    touched the ball, so I'd have scored it a hit.  
    
    That being said, a Ventura or Caminiti or any 3B with range makes that
    play easily...
    
    
    py
29.2055PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 17 1992 14:1810
    I thought a safety squeeze is one in which the runner on third waits to
    make sure the ball is bunted and bunted well.  The suicide squeeze is
    the one where the guy on third is coming down the line no matter what.
    
    Hobson stepped into the Boggs/Clemens controversy and said that it's
    much ado about nuthin'.  Both were raised by good parents to be
    gentlemen.
    
    According to a transcription of a UPI report I saw yesterday, the
    scorer came to Boggs afterwads, Boggs didn't go to the scorer.
29.2056MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Sep 17 1992 14:268
    
    >You mean people are still watching these games?
    
    Well, a baseball game is still better than watching "America's Funniest
    Most Wanted Top Cop Eyewitness Rescue Videos."
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2057Suicide vs SafetySHALOT::HUNTNo, Daddy, I glued them on the fish!Thu Sep 17 1992 14:2936
29.2058I'm watchin' da tomahawk choppersCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadThu Sep 17 1992 14:305
29.2059SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Sep 17 1992 14:412
       The Home Shopping Club is better than a baseball game!
                                   Denny
29.2060PFSVAX::JACOBIf I only had a bulldozerThu Sep 17 1992 14:466
    BobHunt
    
    .2057 is one of the reasons I'll miss ya in here.
    
    JaKe
    
29.2061MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Sep 17 1992 14:473
    
    Yer unAmerican, Denny.
    
29.2062CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttThu Sep 17 1992 14:4811
re Bob and Mac....


Yeah, sorry guys, excuse my ignorance.  I really messed that one up.

That's what I get for doing two things at once.   As soon as you both
talked about the REAL definition, a big bell went off in my head
that said "Idiot!"


'Saw
29.2063MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedThu Sep 17 1992 14:528
    
    "Don't ask for whom the bell tolls.  It tolls for you."
    
    Now, is a suicide blonde different from a safety blonde, and should
    peroxide blondes be banned along with artificial surfaces?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2064and they say this kind of stuff only happens in the NL...PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 17 1992 14:5711
29.2065CNTROL::CHILDSBush Ad -*, H. I. *****, Seinfeld ******Thu Sep 17 1992 15:084
wathc it Saw or you'll be sliding into a hole with the TBBB aka TRBC...

 ;^)
29.2066MSBOS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Sep 17 1992 15:166
    
  >> According to a transcription of a UPI report I saw yesterday, the
  >> scorer came to Boggs afterwads, Boggs didn't go to the scorer.
    
     Boggs summoned Scoggins and proceeded to give him a list of reasons
     why it should be scored a hit.
29.2067CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttThu Sep 17 1992 15:1813
>wathc it Saw or you'll be sliding into a hole with the TBBB aka TRBC...


8^0


Well, fortunately for me, my belly is definitely getting smaller.....
And when I wear my shirts I don't get that crater you can see through
the shirt where the belly button is.....8^)


'Saw

29.2068Great fun!NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 17 1992 15:2014
    
  >> According to a transcription of a UPI report I saw yesterday, the
  >> scorer came to Boggs afterwads, Boggs didn't go to the scorer.
    
   >  Boggs summoned Scoggins and proceeded to give him a list of reasons
   >  why it should be scored a hit.
    
    It sounded like it was somewhere in between.  Scoggins was working at
    his day job as a reporter in the clubhouse and Boggs leaned over to him
    and said "that was a tough error, you know".  And the rest is
    history...
    
    glenn
    
29.2069FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 17 1992 15:236
    If a coach or a PR director comes to me with a question about a play
    I'm always willing to talk it over.  If they don't accept my
    explanation then I refer them to the Elias Sports Bureau.  If they rant
    and rave, I won't listen.
    
    John
29.2070Just say no to tantrum-throwing athletes!NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 17 1992 15:3415
             
    You know, John, I *really, really* think you need to get yourself in 
    a situation where you call it by the book and someone gets denied a
    1000-yard season or something.  Think of the celebrity!  More
    importantly, think of the honor brought to the profession!  ;-)
    
    I seem to recall something like that happening to an Atlanta Falcons
    running back in the early 1970s.  The guy had gone over the 1000-yard
    mark for the season, and they gave him the ball and all of the
    congratulatory handshakes and such, and then on the next play he lost
    five yards and fumbled, or something similar to that.  And that was 
    his last carry of the season...
    
    glenn
     
29.2071BoggsPOWDML::HEIERThu Sep 17 1992 15:3515
    A good point to make is why does Wade Boggs even care if he got
    an error.  It didn't effect the outcome of the game and they lost.
    It shows that some players are much more interested in how they do
    and not how the team does.  Wade has used every excuse this year 
    to explain his poor hitting (injury, sight) to no avail.  He knows
    he gave up 10 million dollars over the next two years to play out
    his option since he thought he was worth more.  As it turns out,
    he made a terrific gamble, and lost!! He will be lucky to get 2
    million next year.
    
    An over used example of a team player was Larry Bird.  After he scored
    40 points in a game but they lost, Bird didn't want to talk about his
    own stats, just the team.  And Boggs tries to compare himself to Bird.
    JEEEZ.
    
29.2072CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttThu Sep 17 1992 15:479
My father is very fond of saying "Takes all kinds to make up a world"....

I guess he's right.

I mean, look at the difference between Ricky Henderson and Nolan Ryan.
Boggs should shut his mouth, and just be a team player......


'Saw
29.2073FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Sep 17 1992 16:396
    Glenn, I hope if I'm ever faced with that situation, I call it right
    and stand up for what I believe in.  If I'm wrong I'm wrong (I've made
    mistakes before and corrected them), but I hope I never change a call
    because of pressure.
    
    John
29.2074WKRP::LEETCHUS Messaging Practice DTN 432-7628Thu Sep 17 1992 16:5815
Re: .2071

>    A good point to make is why does Wade Boggs even care if he got
>    an error.  

I'm neither a Wade Boggs defender not detractor but the fact is is that the
amount a MLB player gets paid depends solely on his individual stats.

Arbitration, free agency, etc. all reward players with good stats. They don't
(for the most part) reward players for playing on a winning team. 

Not that I agree with the above, but dem's the facts of life. Wade is looking
out for his pay stub.

Bruce
29.2075ROYALT::ASHEI think ya hear me knockin'Thu Sep 17 1992 17:2812
    I listened to RKO last night and they had the scorer on.  He said he
    couldn't tell from the replay, but had to make a call and ruled it an
    E.  Because he wasn't 100% he was willing to change it.  Boggs had
    someone tell the scorer he wanted to talk to him, they talked for 90
    seconds and he decided to change it at Wade's request.  In the back
    of the scorer's mind, he knew that would change the ERA, and was
    surprised Wade asked him about it, but that point was never discussed.
    If Wade changed his mind again, he wouldn't have changed it back.
    
    See, and that was the Tigermania game... gee Kev, why didn't ya buy the
    tix?  (hahah)
    
29.2076ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Sep 17 1992 17:2810
    re: .2074
    
    Morris got 5 million from the Blue Jays. A real chunk of that was
    because he had that phenomenal WS, especially game 7. Sure he pitched
    well last year, but the WS was what really got him additional bucks.
    Similar stuff with Ripken and Sandberg, more for the past than the
    future.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2077It's a cain't-missNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 17 1992 17:3712
                                             
    > See, and that was the Tigermania game... gee Kev, why didn't ya buy the
    > tix?  (hahah)
      
    Good stuff always happens at Saturday afternoon Tigermania games. 
    Clemens throwing 165 pitches in 95 deg heat while Tollway Joe snoozes
    in the dugout, Clemens inciting a riot by plunking John Shelby, Roger 
    and Wade starting the Basebawl Scandal...
    
    glenn
    
    
29.2078AXIS::ROBICHAUDW I N D - It BlowsThu Sep 17 1992 18:344
    	If Clemens and Boggs were real main they would settle their
    differences in a steel cage!
    
    				/Don
29.2079ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Sep 17 1992 18:367
    re: .2078
    
    Not everyone can be like you Slasher :-)
    
    HtH
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2080SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Sep 17 1992 18:492
       Think we cain get the two a them on that 'grudge match' show on TV?
                                           Denny
29.2081CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttThu Sep 17 1992 19:3419
No, I liked Slasher firsted idea.

A steel cage, no holds barred, wrasslin match.  Hulk Hogan could
be the celebrity ref.

I can see it now.  Boggsy is getting the better of Rog, and Mo Vaughn
comes running out of the chute, grabs the bars, pulls them aside,
jump in the cage, bashes Wade with a steel chair, but behind Mo,
Greenwell has come into the cage wif a cattle prod and he jabs
Mo in the butt.

This upsets the crowd, and Kirby Puckett, who just happened to be
in the audience, rushes up and jumps on Greenwell's back....


Man, it's good enough for Wrasslemania XXIII.....


'Saw
29.2082anyone besides me admit to watching Grudge Match?JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 17 1992 19:438
    nah nah nah, Grudge Match is definitely the way to go..in round 1, Wade
    and Roger battle it out with oversized Nerf bats, Round 2 could be a
    hamburger bun fight.  In Round 3 provide both combatants with a ream
    of the new no-frills 25 cent Red Sox scorecards, which they can dip in
    grudge glop and hurl at each other... :-)
    
    
    py
29.2083Rog would shut that little weenie up in nuthin flatMR4DEC::WENTZELLIfMusicBeTheFoodOfLove,PlayOn!!!Thu Sep 17 1992 20:065
No contest, Rog would squash po Wade.  After all, I doubt Wade jams his fist 
into buckets of sand - you got a problem wid dat??


29.2084Nexted year, Rog!SHARE::DERRYBush: vegetable or noxious weed?Fri Sep 18 1992 10:071
    
29.2085MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedFri Sep 18 1992 12:409
    
    Roger is shelled!  Five errors committed to boot!  What a bunch of
    bums!
    
    This weekend I'm organizing a group of other equally frustrated fans,
    and we're gonna go out and bomb baseball clinics.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2086ROYALT::ASHEI think ya hear me knockin'Fri Sep 18 1992 13:302
    Winner gets the winner of Pinella-Dibble?
    
29.2087AXIS::ROBICHAUDW I N D - It BlowsFri Sep 18 1992 15:215
    	Wonder if the Sox will raise ticket prices this year?  Maybe
    Dibble and Roger should square off for the "Bad Boy Of Baseball"
    title.
    
    				/Don
29.2088NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 18 1992 15:2712
                              
    > Wonder if the Sox will raise ticket prices this year?
    
    Believe it or not, I've heard such murmurings.  Someone I know who was 
    trying to exchange from a rain-out was told that there might be a hike
    in some of the grandstands, which didn't get one the last time around.
    But considering the way things are wrapping up, and the widespread
    apathy, the Red Sox may re-consider that one this winter...
    
    glenn
    
    
29.2089AXIS::ROBICHAUDW I N D - It BlowsFri Sep 18 1992 15:375
    	WOW Glenn, that's some nerve.  The Broons, Celts and Red Sox
    have had yearly increases for a few years now.  Guess my Pats tickets
    are the best bargain in town.
    
    				/Don
29.2090...relatively speakingAXIS::ROBICHAUDW I N D - It BlowsFri Sep 18 1992 15:371
    
29.2091PFSVAX::JACOBW I N D- it passes and breaksFri Sep 18 1992 15:415
    Just hear that there are 5 guys outside the official scorers office
    wanting to talk about lasted night's decisions.
    
    JaKe
    
29.2092ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Sep 18 1992 16:304
    Is Mike Childs on vacation? 12:30 and no note, must be a new record :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2093JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Sep 18 1992 16:3414
    > Just hear that there are 5 guys outside the official scorers office
    > wanting to talk about lasted night's decisions.
    
    They ought to be thankful only five errors were charged, there were at
    least as many non-error defensive miscues (like not covering bases and
    double plays/fielder's choices that should have been converted and
    weren't).  And that was just in the five innings that I watched before
    turning this game off in disgust.  As an O's fan who was hoping to get
    some more distance put between Baltimore and Milwaukee, thanks for
    nothing.
    
    
    py         
            
29.2094NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 18 1992 16:4310
    
    > As an O's fan who was hoping to get
    > some more distance put between Baltimore and Milwaukee, thanks for
    > nothing.
      
    The Orioles will get their turn next weekend, Paul... and a shot at an
    apparently burnt-out Roger Clemens, too... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
29.2095JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Sep 18 1992 16:477
    re .2094:
    
    Good point Glenn...hopefully after the Jays visit Camden Yards next
    weekend will still mean something.
    
    
    py
29.2096PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Sep 18 1992 16:538
    I've seen 2 sure signs that the Sox are indeed finished (other than the
    standings, of course).  
    
    WTAG AM broke into the Sox telecast the other night to provide updates
    on results of the primary elections.  
    
    All of the TVs at Stoney O'Brien's last night were tuned into the
    Rutgers/Pitt game.
29.2097NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 18 1992 16:5415
    
    > WOW Glenn, that's some nerve.  The Broons, Celts and Red Sox
    > have had yearly increases for a few years now.  Guess my Pats tickets
    > are the best bargain in town.
      
    The Red Sox haven't had yearly increases on a particular seat (I know
    the Celtics have, and massive ones).  I've been out in the bleachers
    for five years and they've gone from $5 to $7 in two $1 increases. 
    Those won't go up this winter, either, or the bleachers will only get
    emptier.  But to raise the price on *any* seats this winter will be a
    PR disaster, no question...
    
    glenn
    
    
29.2098CNTROL::CHILDSClick, Bang. Your daddy just shot po' me..Fri Sep 18 1992 17:107
 When you consider that two weeks ago Roger all but had that Cy Young signed
 sealed and delievered, the soxs out of the pennant, the only pressure on
 Roger was to perform. He's still gaggin' on the big game folks in my best
 questimation....

 mike
29.2099CTHQ::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Fri Sep 18 1992 17:107
    What a disgusting display.  5 flippin' errors, mental miscues.
    Workin' hard fer their money, I see. 
    This team knows how to do one thing, TANK.
    
    
    MikeL
    
29.2100CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Sep 18 1992 17:195
I heard that before the game, the Sox players patted Roger on the butt, handed
him the ball, and said "Roger, pitch like this was the 7th game of the
World Series"  And he went out and did just that.

JD
29.2101Little roller up along first...JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Sep 18 1992 17:207
    re .2100:
    
    And the position players fielded like it was the 6th game of the World
    Series... :-)
    
    
    py
29.2102From philosophy class ;^)MR4DEC::WENTZELLIfMusicBeTheFoodOfLove,PlayOn!!!Fri Sep 18 1992 18:083
"It's hard to soar like an eagle when you're working with turkeys."

29.2103(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBW I N D- it passes and breaksFri Sep 18 1992 19:018
    re .2100
    
    JD, ya wanna send me some windex and paper towels, please???
    
    I gotta clean the diet coke offa this terminal afore I leave.
    
    JaKe
    
29.2104ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Sep 21 1992 20:3410
    The "triple crown" in pitching is Wins, ERA, K's. I just saw a list of
    triple crown winners and Clemens in 1986 was not one of them. Which of
    these categories did Clemens not lead the league in??
    
    As an aside, has there been a player who would have won the triple
    crown in either league. That is he had the highest BA, most HR, most
    RBI's in the majors in a given year?
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2105I'll check at home tonightJARETH::YANKOWSKASCan you do this one?Mon Sep 21 1992 20:3810
    re .2104:
    
    > The "triple crown" in pitching is Wins, ERA, K's. I just saw a list of
    > triple crown winners and Clemens in 1986 was not one of them. Which of
    > these categories did Clemens not lead the league in??
    
    I think Mark Langston won the strikeout title that year.
    
    
    py                                                 
29.2106NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 21 1992 20:3918
    
    > The "triple crown" in pitching is Wins, ERA, K's. I just saw a list of
    > triple crown winners and Clemens in 1986 was not one of them. Which of
    > these categories did Clemens not lead the league in??
    
    Mark Langston edged out Clemens by a few strikeouts in 1986.  There
    have been no pitching Triple Crown winners in the AL since Hal 
    Newhouser did it in 1945.  Dwight Gooden is the last NLer to do it, 
    in 1985. 
    
    Clemens still has a shot at it this year but he'd have to win his last
    three games in strong fashion and hope for some help.  All of the top 
    starters in the AL (Clemens, McDowell, Brown, Morris, Guzman, Appier) 
    have run into some difficulty lately.  The innings start taking their 
    toll...
    
    glenn
    
29.2107ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Sep 21 1992 20:504
    McDowell has 20 wins, Clemens 18, right?? What do the others have?
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2108NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 21 1992 20:5610
    
    > McDowell has 20 wins, Clemens 18, right?? What do the others have?
      
    Brown 19, Morris 19, Guzman 15, Appier 15 with a 2.46 ERA (and done for 
    the season as clubhouse ERA leader, I think).  If Clemens were to win 
    three all it would probably take would be for McDowell to be held to 
    21 wins... but it ain't gonna happen.
    
    glenn
    
29.2109CNTROL::CHILDSGeorge Bush, mental wimpTue Sep 22 1992 12:5910
     
>    Brown 19, Morris 19, Guzman 15, Appier 15 with a 2.46 ERA (and done for 
>    the season as clubhouse ERA leader, I think).  If Clemens were to win 
>    three all it would probably take would be for McDowell to be held to 
>    21 wins... but it ain't gonna happen.
    
 
 Which one Glenn? McDowell checked at 21, or His Highness winning 21?

 ;^)
29.2110NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 22 1992 13:239
    
> Which one Glenn? McDowell checked at 21, or His Highness winning 21?
    
    McDowell may be slightly longer than even odds to win 22, but with
    Bozo's Bigtop Circus behind him the odds on His Highness winning 21 are
    off the board...
    
    glenn
    
29.2111MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedWed Sep 23 1992 13:5213
    
    Po' Mr. Rocket.  In the "Them's the Breaks Dept.", Roger got no support
    again.  That was his 4th complete game loss, coupled with 3 blown saves
    behind him this year.  Plantier didn't come within 5 feet of a 2-out
    fly ball that let in one run, while Hatcher botched a not-so-routine-
    but-catchable 2-out ball that bounced out of his glove like he was
    wearing a dinner plate instead of a glove for another pair of runs. 
    Now that was a play that could have been argued with the official
    scorer.  His Highness ain't so high after three straight losses.
    Trade the bum. ;-)
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2112NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 23 1992 13:5912
    
    Hatcher is one of those massively overrated "underrated" players. 
    After watching him for almost a full season now, he's only a marginal
    improvement over Mike Greenwell in the outfield.  Seriously.

    Clemens didn't get it done, though.  His overpowering stuff has
    deserted him for the rest of the season.  Doesn't mean that with a
    little support he couldn't have picked up a couple of more wins, but
    he's cooked...
    
    glenn
    
29.2113JARETH::YANKOWSKASCan you do this one?Wed Sep 23 1992 14:068
    Didn't see last night's game, but in Clemens' previous start vs.
    Milwaukee there were a good number of hard-hit balls off him.
    
    I suppose any horse's back will break sooner or later if he has to
    carry 24 jockeys...
    
    
    py
29.2114CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Sep 23 1992 14:303
    I see Roger was in post season form again lasted night.
    
    JD
29.2115He always get injuried when he rolls a turkey... CNTROL::CHILDSGeorge Bush, mental wimpWed Sep 23 1992 14:384
 When are they going to announce Roger's injury????

 mike
29.2116If he shut it down right now I'd have no problems with it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 23 1992 15:0314
    
    What do you guys want?  If Clemens were winning these games they'd be
    "meaningless"... if he's losing them they're equated with the
    postseason.
    
    In the past few years there's been a pretty good correlation between
    the Red Sox tanking it and Clemens going along with them after the
    fact, and on the other side of the coin between the Red Sox contending 
    and Clemens rising to the occasion (shutting out Toronto twice down the
    stretch in 1990, etc.).  That doesn't sound like a stats and awards guy
    to me.  I'd rather have it this way than the other way around...
    
    glenn
    
29.2117SOLANA::MAY_BRI need a bambulanceWed Sep 23 1992 15:134
    
    glenn, they just want to bust your b@!!s.  Ignore them.
    
    Brews
29.2118I just had to say that!!KEPNUT::DIGGINSFolly Yurken?Wed Sep 23 1992 15:146
    
    Phil Plantier is a stiff.
    
    
    
    Steve
29.2119Can't wait for October 8!SHARE::DERRYOnly 151 days til spring training...Wed Sep 23 1992 15:221
    
29.2120NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 23 1992 15:329
    
    > glenn, they just want to bust your b@!!s.  Ignore them.
    
    Yes, I know, but I'm trapped by my obligation to play the foil in this
    note and to keep the record straight... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
    
29.2121JARETH::YANKOWSKASCan you do this one?Wed Sep 23 1992 15:337
    In fairness, Roger is far from the only Cy Young contender who's
    running out of gas as the season winds down...Tom Glavine has pitched
    poorly since winning his 20th, ditto with Jack McDowell, and Kevin
    Appier sustained an injury that put him out for the season.
    
    
    py
29.2122CSC32::M_MACGREGORWed Sep 23 1992 23:566
    Boy am I glad I'm in Colorado Springs now.  I no longer have to suffer
    through the Red Sox and I'm swapping teams.  Now I can't really be
    called a trader because it is a different league and an expansion team.
    Colorado's own Rockies (yay!  Probably get a better record too)
    
    Marc
29.2123CSC32::SALZERThu Sep 24 1992 03:2811
    I didn't want to come into the 93 inagural Rockies' season 
    cold. Since last season I've been following events fairly
    close both here and around the leagues. I thought it would
    be an easy transition to the Rockies full time. What I've	
    found out is that I think I'll keep my allegiance to the 
    the Indians as much now as ever and devote time to the 
    new guys too. One team in the AL and one in the NL ought
    to keep me going next year. 
    
    BoB 
    
29.2124Da curseSHARE::DERRYOnly 151 days til spring training...Thu Sep 24 1992 13:421
    Father Guido Sarducci is exorcising Fenway in about 5 minutes...
29.2125(8^)*PFSVAX::JACOBMartina's half the man Jimmy C. isThu Sep 24 1992 13:454
    Is Father Porter taking part, too????
    
    JaKe
    
29.2126+CSTEAM::FARLEYCandidate for TossingThu Sep 24 1992 13:5816
    
    Lasted time I seen a exorcism, the yung lass spinned her haid all
    around.
    
    Will Fenway Pahk lift itsalf up and spin 'round and 'round sorta like
    somthang y'ud see in a GhostBuster's(tm) movie?
    
    If it does, will the popcorn kernels and empty plactic cups fall to the
    ground or will they be "forced" towards the outer edges of the stadium?
    
    wondering.......
    
    I remain,
    an angel (as of lasted night)
    Kev
    
29.2127AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo,That'sAllYaGottaKnowThu Sep 24 1992 15:554
    	HA!  I can see it now.  Gorman's haid spinning 'round and 'round
    saying "What would we do with Barry Bonds".
    
    				/Don
29.2128ROYALT::ASHEI think ya hear me knockin'Thu Sep 24 1992 20:582
    What's the tragic number now?
    
29.2129Ya right...KEPNUT::DIGGINSFolly Yurken?Fri Sep 25 1992 12:459
    
    Hey the Stiffs actually won a game lasted night!!! 
    
    Looks like the WBCN excorsism worked! Allrighta!! 
    
    1993 WORLD SERIES CHAMPS!!!!
    
    
    Steve
29.2130FDCV07::KINGI've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!!Fri Sep 25 1992 14:024
    Enjoy baseball thised year because there won't be Major League baseball
    nexred year for a while...
    
    REK
29.2131Winners of 3 outta 4 since the big E.SHARE::DERRYOnly 146 days til spring training...Mon Sep 28 1992 09:151
    
29.2132CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Sep 28 1992 11:223
Yep, and old Roger gets an injury.  Or so he says.

JD
29.2133CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadMon Sep 28 1992 12:241
I think Rog' got a case of the "I'm-out-of-the-Cy-sweepstakes-itis".
29.2134NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 28 1992 12:3610
    
    As I said earlier, Clemens should just shut it down.  He admitted to
    hurting himself during that great game against Texas and Nolan Ryan
    (not after a loss or a bad game) and he's stunk since.  The *team*
    thing to do would be to not risk further injury and just to pick it up
    next year, but I'm sure either way he goes the decision will be
    criticized...
    
    glenn
    
29.2135CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttMon Sep 28 1992 12:4114
>    As I said earlier, Clemens should just shut it down.  He admitted to
>    hurting himself during that great game against Texas and Nolan Ryan
>    (not after a loss or a bad game) and he's stunk since.  The *team*
>    thing to do would be to not risk further injury and just to pick it up
>    next year, but I'm sure either way he goes the decision will be
>    criticized...
    
Kind of like the Patriots yesterday -- by the end of the game they
just wanted to get outta there without any injuries...


Two peas in a pod,
'Saw    

29.2136But I bet Al Bumbry will be coaching first base nexted seasonCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadTue Sep 29 1992 13:2811
Ya know, as a long time Red Sox fan, I feel so much better that the team is 
mending their ways when it comes to the recognized racist policies of the past. 
Yup, something to be proud of.

Oh gee, what's this I read in today's paper - they have decided that they would 
only renew one contract between Tom Brunansky ($2.3M) and Billy Hatcher ($2.0M), 
and that they have decided upon Bruno.  Oh, and the other item I read was that 
the expansion list leaves Ellis Burks unprotected, while Mike Greenwell is 
protected.  I couldn't be a pattern, now could it?  Nah, not the new Red Sox.

=Bob=
29.2137They're all bums...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 29 1992 13:3917
    Brunansky should not be renewed at the price, even though he had the 
    best season at the plate of any Red Sox.  The rest of the moves make 
    complete sense.  Billy Hatcher can't run anymore and that means he 
    can't play, and certainly not for $2 million.  Ellis Burks is coming 
    off two of the most serious injuries an athlete can have-- both back 
    and knee problems, and likely won't be drafted while Greenwell could 
    be (personally, I'd dangle both if there was anybody at all with the
    slightest chance of developing in the minors).
    
    And of course, a white franchise "legend" like Wade Boggs probably
    isn't going to be asked back either, and is going out in a wave of
    shame to boot.  The Red Sox are stocked with stiffs, black and white.  
    Let's see who they replace them with.
    
    glenn
    
29.2138MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedTue Sep 29 1992 14:0016
    
    Brady Anderson....Brady Anderson....now where have I heard that name
    before?  He didn't happen to play for the Red Sox at one time did he?
    He became the first American Leaguer to have 20 or more homers, 50
    stolen bases (do the Sox as a team have 50 this year?) and 75 RBI's in
    one season.  It's enough to bring tears to one's eyes to think of the
    Brady's, the Cecil Coopers, the Pudge's, and others who went on to
    shine elsewhere.  I honestly can't think of anyone who the Sox have
    "stolen" who went on to have a distinguished career in Boston, with
    the possible exception of Luis Tiant, who they took from the scrap
    heap.  Sure they may have grabbed a Tom Seaver, a Bill Campbell, even
    a Nick Esasky or a Tony Armas who served a short-term purpose, but...
    (sigh).....Brady Anderson.....why can't we get guys like that?
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2139CAMONE::WAYAnd monkies might fly outta my buttTue Sep 29 1992 14:154
	

	
		Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear?
29.2140AXIS::ROBICHAUDNewEnglandPatriots-ItsGonnaTakeAlotTue Sep 29 1992 14:214
    	The Boston Red Sox are the biggest waste of money and hoopla
    since the '92 Mets.
    
    				/Don
29.2141SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Sep 29 1992 14:343
       Any truth to the rumor the Socks are throwing Mighty Matt Young at
    the Jays tomorrow night? Oughta make the Brewers all warm and fuzzy!
                                     Denny
29.2142PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Sep 29 1992 14:4912
29.2143Inquiring minds and all thatPFSVAX::JACOBAnd Nirvana can fly outta my buttTue Sep 29 1992 15:029
    >>That's what Ned & Jerry said last night.  Hobson was thinking about
    
    
    What do the Ice Cream guys have to do with baseball????
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
29.2144one gong to goCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeWed Sep 30 1992 01:465
    
    Guess who lost 5-2  to Toronto just now?
    
    ?
    
29.2145PFSVAX::JACOBWhere the Hell am I??Wed Sep 30 1992 01:5011
    re-.1
    
    The bigger question is 
    
    
    WHO CARES!!!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
29.2146PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Sep 30 1992 12:054
    Viola asked to pitch in tonight's game and is being allowed to do so. 
    He's going on 3 days rest.
    
    Clemens will miss the remainder of the season due to a groin pull.
29.2147AXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeBush-Let'sGetItOn!...LaterWed Sep 30 1992 14:506
    	Just a coincidence that Viola pitches tonight?  Could be the
    "Commissioner Committee" decided that the only race left could be
    over one day sooner if the doorMatt pitches and let the Sox know
    about it.
    
    				/Don
29.2148TypicalCTHQ::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Sep 30 1992 16:2311
    Yabbut I want to know, not that it matters to me, but the BrewCrew
    fans must be lovin' it,
    
    What the hail was Hobson doing in the top of the seventh? Sox down,
    5-2 two on two out. Gaston removes Key for Duane Ward with Jody Reed
    due up.  hobson lets Boy Wonder hit and he flie meekly to center.
    Now Ward's a righty, Reed bats righty. WHERE WAS EITHER VAUGHN OR
    PLANTIER?? I could hear the shout all the way from Milwaukee.
    
    MikeL
    
29.2149CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Sep 30 1992 16:268
MIke....

Clell has tucked his tail betwixt his banged up laigs and headed home
to Abalama....if only figuratively.....


hth,
'Saw
29.2150My comments from RED_SOX... Butch's brain has calcified...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Sep 30 1992 16:2717
    The Butcher did it again last night!  He was sitting on his hands
    in the 7th as Jody Reed was allowed to hit with two men on, and then
    Wedge is again the guy who gets sat down later when he finally figures 
    out to use Vaughn.  Now the Brewers have something to legitimately 
    protest.  It's pretty bad when the Red Sox home announcers are 
    not-so-subtly banging on your every decision (or non-decision).
    
    Is it just me, or can anyone else stop themselves from bursting out
    in laughter when the cameras keep showing Butch and Zim sitting
    side-by-side, stoically, silently in the dugout?  Does Butch ever even
    move?  I'm serious; I rarely see him even talking to anyone in there,
    much less his so-called "mentor"...
    
    glenn
    
                                        
29.2151CNTROL::CHILDSMagic an egomanic or NBA=WWF?Wed Sep 30 1992 16:386
 Does it really matter? I mean we are talking the Red Soxs here. Let say
 Butch had made the switch and Vaughn or Wedge hit it out to tie. They
 surely would have lost it later....

 mike
29.2152Butch cain't think1/2 move aheadCTHQ::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Sep 30 1992 16:566
    As I said it really doesn't matter to me at this point.
    But this looks like just an indication of brain-dead tactics.
    Hosbon has no clue. Where's Tollway Joe?
    
    MikeL
    
29.2153AXIS::CHAPPELCalling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.HowardWed Sep 30 1992 16:5912
29.2154SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Sep 30 1992 17:234
       Gee, isn't that 'commissioner committee' headed by the owner of the
    ...
    Brewers!!?
                                        Denny
29.2155Just lookin' after the "best interests a' baseball" there DennyAXIS::ROBICHAUDGeorgeBush-Let'sGetItOn!...LaterWed Sep 30 1992 18:431
    
29.2156JUPITR::MIOLAPhantomThu Oct 01 1992 03:348
    
    
    And Viola backs up his request with a one hitter....
    
    9'th inning single.
    
    
    Lou
29.2157Many Gongs!!!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Oct 01 1992 11:112
       Sox Clinch last. But they backed in w/a Tiger loss!
                                       Denny
29.2158AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowThu Oct 01 1992 11:144
    	A nohitter would've at least salvaged a shred of dignity for
    the season.  Hey Selig, the Sox held up their end of the deal.
    
    				/Don
29.2159wasted artillary CNTROL::CHILDSMagic an egomanic or NBA=WWF?Thu Oct 01 1992 12:108
> 	A nohitter would've at least salvaged a shred of dignity for
>      the season.  Hey Selig, the Sox held up their end of the deal.
  
 and it would have been an accomplishment the his Highness has never achieved
 with this sad sack team. I shouldn't have watched that ninth inning I probably
 KOD'ed him...

 mike
29.2160Score anyone?KEPNUT::DIGGINSFolly Yurken?Thu Oct 01 1992 12:389
    
    So did Swillwalkee beat Seattle lasted??
    
    
    Nice job by Viola, you just knew he wasn't going to get the
    steenkin' no hitter tho'...........
    
    
    Steve
29.2161NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 01 1992 13:1113
    
    > So did Swillwalkee beat Seattle lasted??
    
    Nope.  See ya...
    
    How did I know that a jab at my main Roger would work its way into this?  
    Until someone else strikes out 20 batters in a game (hint: it's been done
    *once* in over 150,000 major league starts), I'm not going to criticize
    anyone for their failure to achieve a dastickical novelty... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
    
29.216225 years ago today!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Oct 01 1992 15:163
       2 Excellent articles in today's Glob about the '67 finale. One by
    Bob Ryan and one by Kevin Dupont. 
                                      Denny
29.2163CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Thu Oct 01 1992 15:3210
    Heard some fuuny remembrances about '67 this morning on WEEI.
    One guy who went to the game and was on the field remembers taking
    the train back to Reveyah and seeing many "souvenirs".  He said
    it was amusing to see sheet metal sections of the scoreboard being
    dragged onto the Blue Line.  This caller said one guy had sections
    that said "CLEVE" and "NY". Too funny.
    
    
    MikeL
    
29.2164AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowThu Oct 01 1992 15:3414
	Yeah Denny, brings back some good memories.  I was 13 years old and 
lived and died with the Sox that summer.  Even had a transistor radio to slip 
under the pillow so I could catch the west coast games.  My brother and I 
watched the game over my grandmother's because our TV was one of those crappy 
blue portable jobs with rabbit ears, while granny had a console model attached 
to a real antenna.  I think channel 5 did that game with Coleman, Martin and 
Parnell swithcing assignments from radio to TV every few innings.  What a game.
I remember going over to what was then Bert's Variety to listen to WHDH's 
broadcast of the Tigers game against the Angels and the place was SRO.  All I 
can remember was the Tiger announcer saying that Al Kaline was on deck when 
McAuliffe hit into the double play.  What a time.  If I only knew then what I 
was getting suckered into.  8^)

				/Don
29.2165Under Lufay's tutelageCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Thu Oct 01 1992 15:378
    Yea Slash,
    Because of '67, yer legacy will forever be leading those poor
    Japanese exchange students in doing the wave barechested (ah, you
    that is).
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
29.2166MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 01 1992 15:526
    
     Nice little slice of American there, Slashman. I was seven years old
    in '67 and the Boomer was my favorite player later to be replaced by
    Reggie Smith and Joe LaHoud. I don't think kids get quite that juiced
    about sports in geeneral and baseball in particular anymore but I could
    be wrong.
29.2167CNTROL::CHILDSMagic an egomanic or NBA=WWF?Thu Oct 01 1992 16:296
 Heck, I'm almost 29 and I don't get the juiced about baseball either...
 :^)

 of course now if you want talk "I wannabe like Mike".....the blood just 
 rushes to my head
29.2168ole Tiger greatFRETZ::HEISERresident apologeticistThu Oct 01 1992 17:021
    Al Kaline, now there was a ball player!
29.2169hot rivalryCNTROL::CHILDSMagic an egomanic or NBA=WWF?Thu Oct 01 1992 17:046
>>>    Al Kaline, now there was a ball player!

       but was he better than "the Yaz"?

 mike
29.2170Jest gotta raise 'em right... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 01 1992 17:088
    
    > Nice little slice of American there, Slashman. I was seven years old
    > in '67 and the Boomer was my favorite player later to be replaced by
    > Reggie Smith and Joe LaHoud. I don't think kids get quite that juiced
    > about sports in geeneral and baseball in particular anymore but I could
    > be wrong.
    
    Mine do!
29.2171SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Oct 01 1992 17:093
       Yeah, Glenn, but what choice do they have standing next to your
    chair with beers on their li'l haids!
                              Denny
29.2172Parental influence is *so* important...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 01 1992 17:146
    
    Damn straight!  One will do at home, but at Fenway you gotta have two
    cuz that's the beer limit...
    
    glenn
      
29.2173-1, Rollward glenn!!!CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Thu Oct 01 1992 17:281
    
29.2174CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Oct 01 1992 17:418
Mike -

Al Kaline > Yaz (And I was a big Yaz fan - until his last years...)

And while the 67 Impossible Dream was great - especially for a Sox fan in
da Bronx - the 69 Mets were one step better (I.E. they won teh champeenship..)

JD
29.2175'SIXTY _ SEVEN ??????????? sheesh!!!!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeThu Oct 01 1992 23:4115
    
    Good grief Tommy!
    
    In '67, when you wuz 7 years old, collecting cards and chewing the flat
    pink gum and flipping and playin 'wallies with the "guys" and woulda
    probably hurled if'n somebody suggested swappin spit with a GIRL,
    I was a H.S. junior engrossed in the pursuit of doing just that!
    
    ps - just to keep JaKe at bay, I was also a very successful pursuer!
    Probably had a "hit" 60% of the time!
    
    I remain,
    younger than LeE and with fresher memories!
    Kev
    
29.2176FDCV06::KINGI've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!!Fri Oct 02 1992 00:228
    I remember 67... I was in the 8th grade.. football.. starting left
    linebacker on a team that went 8-0 267 points for and 18 against..
    We were awesome.. ( The 72 team went 7-1-1 and won the State
    championship NH "I" Division". I remember our caoch pulling us off the
    field to listen to KEN COLEMAN call the games against the Cardinals..
    Great Series... 
    
    REK
29.2177CSC32::M_MACGREGORFri Oct 02 1992 12:574
    Wow, 67, what a great year, why I remem...hmm wait a minute, I wasn't
    even born yet...never mind.
    
    Marc
29.2178JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Oct 02 1992 13:2412
    I was in 5th grade in 1967.  Back then all World Series games were
    played during the day; the kids in my class begged and pleaded with our
    teacher to be able to listen to Game 1 during school time.  We reached
    a compromise where we could listen to the game, but had to prepare a
    report on it as a homework assignment.  
    
    Not everyone in my class was rooting for the Sox -- there happened to
    be a girl in my class who had moved to West Boylston from Missouri that
    summer.  Turned out she got the last laugh...
    
    
    py
29.2179CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicFri Oct 02 1992 13:3416
>    I was in 5th grade in 1967.  Back then all World Series games were
>    played during the day; the kids in my class begged and pleaded with our
>    teacher to be able to listen to Game 1 during school time.  We reached
>    a compromise where we could listen to the game, but had to prepare a
>    report on it as a homework assignment.  
    
Me too.

Seems that the school bus NEVER got home fast enough.   We were literally
incommunicado in school.  No radio, no TV, no nothing.

Although I'm sure the principal was sitting on his pompous ass watching
it in the teachers lounge....


'Saw
29.2180MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedFri Oct 02 1992 13:5227
    
    Ah, the summer of '67.  The best summer of my life, so far.  Went to
    the final game with some guys on a whim (we had no tickets), but got
    there early enough to scarf some standing room on the first base side.
    Went down on the field afterwards.  Saw a lot of games that year, and
    Yaz seemed to hit one out every time.
    
    Took the T out to B.C. after the game to meet a friend and hung around
    the campus.  We had a radio, but we didn't need one since either everyone 
    that walked by had one (walkmen weren't invented yet), or the sounds of 
    the game could be heard coming from the open dorm windows.  The place
    just lit up when the Tigers lost.
    
    Wish we had gone back to Kenmore square to kiss the girls again. (It
    was the Summer of Love, after all.  Scott McKenzie sang San Francisco,
    The Doors did Light My Fire, Cream scored with Sunshine of Your Love,
    and the Boston Common was Haight-Asbury East.)
    
    Off to college, classes were cut to watch the games, but then again,
    most of the teachers were seen in the student lounge glued to the tube
    also.  The student union building had "Yaz, sir, that's my baby" across
    the windows of the top floor, a sign in front of the school proclaimed
    "Yaz went here", and I was still a virgin.
    
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2181AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowFri Oct 02 1992 14:005
    	Sister Mary Jean, the Saint Bernard's High principal was such
    a die-hard Red Sox fan that she had the World Series games piped
    in through the school's intercom system.
    
    				/Don
29.2182ROYALT::ASHEOk Dennis Leary, 2 words: Dave EdmundsFri Oct 02 1992 20:531
    I would start kindergarden the nexted year...
29.2183TORREY::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownFri Oct 02 1992 22:476
    
    Walt, you are confused.  It was 1_9_67, not 1_8_67.  
    
    HTH,
    
    Brews
29.2184ROYALT::ASHEOk Dennis Leary, 2 words: Dave EdmundsSun Oct 04 1992 22:174
    Yeah, I know Bruce... what class were you in when you heard about JFK?
    
    -Walt (who was getting a 2 week checkup and doesn't remember that
    event).
29.2185ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Oct 05 1992 15:2114
    
    Oldies 103 uses a character playing Joe Morgan (former manager of the
    Red Sox) who calls in every so often. So he calls in this morning and
    asks some basic questions like where did the Red Sox finish, how many
    games worse than 1991. Then he asks:
    
    What do the Red Sox have in common with 14 year old boys with zits on
    their faces??
    
    
    None of them can score
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2186PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 05 1992 15:347
29.2187CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 15:472
 how the heck come Wade played yesterday? Why wasn't he protecting his average?
29.2188CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 05 1992 15:496
Why did they can Ned Martin?  Did he ping on Clell one too many times?

Was he telling it like it is?


'Saw
29.2189MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedMon Oct 05 1992 15:599
    
    I liked Ned in his day, but that day is gone.  I got the impression
    that his mind just wasn't on the game anymore (didn't know the count,
    the score, or who was at bat.)  His enthusiasm was shot, but that could
    be just a reflection of the team itself.  Guess it's time for a change
    all around.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2190PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 05 1992 16:067
29.2191MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedMon Oct 05 1992 16:3726
    
    Endings We'd Like to See Dept:
    
    It is the final game of the season.  It is the bottom of the ninth.
    The Sox trail 9-0, having given up runs on 4 errors, 5 walks, a passed
    ball, and a wild pitch.  The Sox themselves have left 16 runners on
    base through a series double plays, pickoffs, and baserunning blunders.
    
    As Jody steps to the plate, a rumbling is heard up in section 3.  It
    is the sound of booing.  It is getting louder, and it is spreading. 
    Jody takes strike three down the middle, and the noise becomes louder.
    Boggs taps to short for out number two, and the boos now rain down from
    the grandstand, the bleachers, and even the roof boxes.  Jack Clark
    steps up to a tremendous uproar of boos and jeers.  34,000 people are
    now on their feet, booing in unison.  Nothing like this has ever been
    seen at Fenway before.  Clark takes strike two, and 34,000 fans
    continue the uproar, while all 34,000 turn their backs to the lousy
    team on the field.  The noise becomes deafening, then begins to fade
    as the fans file out.
    
    The stands are completely empty when the umpire calls "Steerike three!"
    
    Fitting, I'd say.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2192ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Oct 05 1992 16:477
    re: .2191
    
    The fact that you start with the assumption that 34,000 fans are in the
    park for such a game means that that ending will never happen.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2193DUGROS::ROSSTake a spin on DEC Death SpiralMon Oct 05 1992 17:325
Token JD response:

	 Yeah, and if Clark happened to hit a HR rather than 
	 strikeout, the fans would rush back in and chant,
	 "MVP, MVP, MVP. "
29.2194WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MCowboys sip......Mon Oct 05 1992 17:376
    
    
             And Don't forget if Clark hit that homer Lou Gorman would say
    I knew he'd come through for us and Than he'd extend his contract.
    
    Chap(PY)
29.2195DUGROS::ROSSTake a spin on DEC Death SpiralMon Oct 05 1992 17:4421
Solution to the Red Sox problems:

	1. Fire Lou Gorman
	2. Trade  Burks/Plantier to Yankees for
		Roberto Kelly
	3. Release Jack Clark, Matt Young, Hatcher
	4. Don't re-sign Boggs
	5. Make following free agent offers but warn fans
		ahead of time that signing these free agents
		will require adding $2 per seat per game to ticket
		prices

		a. Ruben Sierra  5 years for $24 million
		b. Barry Bonds   5 years for $26 million
		c. Kirby Puckett 5 years for $26 million		
	
	6. Hire Don Baylor as batting coach.  
	7. Develop plan to expand Fenway by 10K seats by 1995
	8. Trade Viola/Greenwell to Reds for Dibble/O'Neill

	
29.2196LAGUNA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownMon Oct 05 1992 18:007
    
    re-1
    
    Raising ticket prices by $2 will only pay for only one of those
    signings.
    
    Brews
29.2197PW BoggsCNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 18:027
 I was kinda refering to his lifetime average Mac. Which he did protect cause
 after he went 1 for 2 he pulled himself out the game...

 according to a quote I just read, he played cause wife told him too....

 mike
29.2198PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 05 1992 18:125
29.2199CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 18:175
 yeah the same bad wheels he had when Roger was out there strucking out Donbo
 and Molitor while Wade was calling KFC......

 wannna buy a bridge?
29.2200AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowMon Oct 05 1992 18:206
    	Even though Martin was not the same announcer he was when he
    worked with Woods, he did deserve to go out better than this.  Course
    the Red Sox did the same thing to Woods when they let him go so
    they're consistent, consistently classless.
    
    				/Don
29.2201PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 05 1992 18:382
    4 at bats at this stage in his career are not going to have a
    significant impact on his BA.
29.2202CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 18:572
 to a stats freak like him they certainly do mean something....
29.2203PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 05 1992 18:584
29.2204CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Mon Oct 05 1992 19:034
 it means another hit he may never get.....

 I guess at the rate this ine's going we'll have to agree to disagree...
29.2205NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 05 1992 19:3119
    
    If Wade's looking to protect his lifetime batting average, he'd better
    retire, and quick.  It drops almost five points during seasons like 
    1990 and 1992 (I'm not sure if you're serious or not, Mike C-- you do 
    keep us on our toes, though!).
    
    What exactly did the Red Sox do to Ned Martin that was so classless?
    He didn't want to go, so they fired him.  Should they have publicly
    announced that?  This is *not* an Ernie Harwell situation.  Martin is 
    69 years old, has faltered less than gracefully, and he's only working 
    NESN (which no one really cares about) anyway with one of the worst 
    announcers currently employed in the game, Jerry Remy.  NESN's team is
    so bad that I don't know why anyone would put up with it instead of 
    turning on the radio.  Why are the Red Sox the only team in MLB that
    can't replace a fading player, manager, or other employee without 
    public apology?
    
    glenn
    
29.2206FDCV06::KINGI've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!!Tue Oct 06 1992 11:2656
Solution to the Red Sox problems:

>	1. Fire Lou Gorman
    
    or

Hire an assistant who knows the minor league players...

>	2. Trade  Burks/Plantier to Yankees for
>		Roberto Kelly

Even the Yankees are not this stupid. The yanks have NO USE for
Red Sox OF's. With the Williams and Tartabull and the signing
of either Sierra or Bonds.... Plus Burks or Plantier could
carry Kelly's jock....

>	3. Release Jack Clark, Matt Young, Hatcher

Keep Hatcher as an 4th OF...

>	4. Don't re-sign Boggs

Depends on the price tag...

>	5. Make following free agent offers but warn fans
>		ahead of time that signing these free agents
>		will require adding $2 per seat per game to ticket
>		price

>		a. Ruben Sierra  5 years for $24 million
>		b. Barry Bonds   5 years for $26 million
>		c. Kirby Puckett 5 years for $26 million		

This is a joke right? The bidding will start at 5 years 32 mil...
And I don't think either of these 3 want to come to Boston. Plus
JRY Corp. would never spend the money.....
	
>	6. Hire Don Baylor as batting coach.  

Good move, but would he sign with Boston? I don't think so, he 
wants to be a manager....

>	7. Develop plan to expand Fenway by 10K seats by 1995

Yeah.. Right! Where? I wish the place would BURN down so we could
get a real baseball park..... Fenway has passed its time....

>	8. Trade Viola/Greenwell to Reds for Dibble/O'Neill

Anoter pipe dream.. The Reds are not this stupid.... Look for
Dibble to end up in New York.. The Yankees.... Something like
a Roberto Kelly and one of the kid pitchers for Dibble...

REK

	
29.2207I guess Mike C will have to listen to the radioPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 06 1992 13:382
    Clemens will be a guest commentator for CBS during the championship
    series television broadcasts.
29.2208CNTROL::CHILDSWill Ross, throw George a life-jacket?Tue Oct 06 1992 14:057
 No way Mac. He ought to udder some juicy tidbits for me to devour......

 Glenn, I'm serious about Boggs. History show he's in love with two things
 himself and his stats....

 mike
29.2209Beats the heck out of Jerry Remy.SALEM::DODAPatriots: Red Sox in helmetsTue Oct 06 1992 15:4211
Ever notice how as the game went on ole Ned would get more and 
more mixed up? Wrong count, wrong batter, wrong inning...

Rumor was that Ned hit the beer stand early and often and as the 
game went on, well, you get the idea...

I really enjoyed Martin and Starr, sober or not.

I doubt he'll catch on elsewhere if the rumors are true.

daryll
29.2210CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicFri Oct 09 1992 20:2511
>   <<< Note 154.441 by PFSVAX::JACOB "Could Ted Williams bat .400 today?" >>>
                                       ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I'd bet he could.  For my money, the man had the best eye in baseball.


The Splendid Splinter....


'Saw

29.2211ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Fri Oct 09 1992 20:519
    'Saw
    
    No debate that Williams had the best eye, or close to it, in baseball
    history. But with all the relief specialists these days I am not so
    sure if he would have hit .400 today. I wonder if anyone has stats on
    how many hits Williams got in each inning of his .406 season.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2212PFSVAX::JACOBCould Ted Williams bat .400 today?Fri Oct 09 1992 21:2113
    Personally, I doubt he could hit .400 today, maybe he could hit .200 or
    .225, but definitely not .400.
    
    My main reasoning for this stance is because
    
    THE MAN IS 72 YEARS OLD!!!!  How could a 72 year old have a quick enuf
    bat to hit .400????
    
    (8^)*
    In search of a new p_name since ya finally picked up on it.
    
    JaKe
    
29.2213CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 12 1992 11:2019
>    THE MAN IS 72 YEARS OLD!!!!  How could a 72 year old have a quick enuf
>    bat to hit .400????
    
WRONG, Mr. Pittsburgh!

Ted Williams was born in 1918.  I remember that because it's roughly
the same age as my Dad.  That makes him 74, which is a year younger
than my dad.

About 10 years ago, however, there was some speculation that Williams,
if he shed some weight, could still hit well against Major Leauge pitching.
It was interesting to read, but I was doubtful.

While I've only seen Williams play in old film clips, I'd prefer to remember
him that way....


'Saw    

29.2214PFSVAX::JACOBAnd I fall down 3 times a dayMon Oct 12 1992 18:4412
    
>>WRONG, Mr. Pittsburgh!

>>Ted Williams was born in 1918.  I remember that because it's roughly
    
    So I was off by 2 years, I'll have to go back to the moron who told it
    to ME and nail him to the wall.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
29.2215CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 13 1992 11:518
>    So I was off by 2 years, I'll have to go back to the moron who told it
>    to ME and nail him to the wall.
    
Send me pictures....8^)


'Saw    

29.2216Rumors rumors.HYDRA::HAUSRATHMoney talks, but Credit has an EchoTue Oct 13 1992 12:056
    
    So, is Roooooooooger headed to Texas?   
    
    Inquiring minds...
    
    /Jeff
29.2217no more Wade, no more Roger=real boring baseballCNTROL::CHILDSWould Saw dump a Harley for a Woman?Tue Oct 13 1992 12:419
 If he has his way he is. I say a quick interview with him on a golf course
 and basically he said he wouldn't mind being traded at all. He liked Texas
 lineup, said they had alot of hitting and potential...

 please don't trade him Lou. ::Sports is in enough trouble already, if we
 don't have Roger to kick around who will we have?

 mike
29.2218CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadTue Oct 13 1992 13:114
Ya mean Roger bashing wouldn't be jsut as much fun if he were a Ranger?  Why 
not?

=Bob=
29.2219;^)CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLTue Oct 13 1992 13:205
 cause you guys wouldn't be telling me he's God anymore. There also wouldn't
 be 120 articles a week in the local rags about him. There is hope though
 cause him and Canseco might get into a few who's better who's best contest
 simular to him and Wade....
29.2220AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowTue Oct 13 1992 13:585
    	If the Sox trade Clemens then you know the team is being sold
    and the balance sheet is being tidied up for the new owners.  It
    will also mean years and years of cellar dwelling.
    
    				/Don
29.2221cellar dwelling that is...CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLTue Oct 13 1992 14:474
Well they got a good start on it this year.....

mike
29.2222LJOHUB::CRITZTue Oct 13 1992 15:019
    	Well, as the sport person on channel <?> said, "He'll never
    	be more valuable than he is right now."
    
    	If they plan on trading him, now, while he's still a dominating
    	pitcher, is the best time.
    
    	Whether they should EVER trade him is another issue.
    
    	Scott
29.2223PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 13 1992 15:125
29.2224CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLTue Oct 13 1992 15:3416
29.2225LAGUNA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownTue Oct 13 1992 18:285
    
    Mike, who pays for the ENquirer?  That's what long lines at the grocery
    store are for...
    
    Brews
29.2226didn't know Boston dumped himFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictThu Oct 15 1992 19:541
    How did Dan Schneider get on the Braves?
29.2227AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowThu Oct 15 1992 20:004
    	SnideAir was traed lasted August for a couple of minor league
    "prospects".
    
    				/Don
29.2228AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowThu Oct 15 1992 20:036
    	...and speaking of the Slobs this Clemens for Gonzales would
    be vintage Red Sox.  I mean Juan is the quintessential Red Soxer.
    He hits a ton of homeruns (none in the clutch), and he plods along
    in the outfield like a Clydesdale.
    
    				   /Don
29.2229ROYALT::ASHEand I'm bringin Deion &amp; his big bad K...Thu Oct 15 1992 20:542
    Something about going to wear Columbia blue uni's...
    
29.2230QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 15 1992 21:042
    I knew...  Schnide and Reardon are the same person !!
    
29.2231need help from Red Sox fans - can't believe I said thatACESMK::FRANCUSFrancisco Cabrera, my heroThu Oct 15 1992 23:4711
    While drowning away his sorrows, Bill came up with another possible
    measure - other than the dreaded ex-Cubs factor - in trying to
    determine who will win a series. This could be especially important
    since an ex-Cubs factor differential of one is considered to be
    meaningless. So the question for all you Red Sox mavens is how many
    ex-Red Sox are there on the rosters of Atlanta and Toronto. 
    
    Reardon is obviously one on the Braves.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2232Nobody help out Craze, let him figure it out hisself!AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowThu Oct 15 1992 23:530
29.2233ACESMK::FRANCUSFrancisco Cabrera, my heroFri Oct 16 1992 03:387
    re: .2232
    
    Don't be a spoil sport just because you don't know enough to help out
    :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2234GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPipsqueak Aryan CabbageheadFri Oct 16 1992 11:578
     <<< Note 29.2227 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "JackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnow" >>>
>
>    	SnideAir was traed lasted August for a couple of minor league
>    "prospects".
    
    Whattabout Billy Hatcher?
    
    Mark.
29.2235PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 16 1992 12:175
29.2236CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Fri Oct 16 1992 12:265
    I think Reardone might be it, Craze.
    Why do you think these two teams made it to the Series?
    
    MikeL
    
29.2237PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 16 1992 12:323
    There has been no documented "ex-Red Sox jinx".  The "ex-Cub jinx" only
    holds for the World Series and has no bearing on either of the
    championship series.
29.2238ACESMK::FRANCUSFrancisco Cabrera, my heroFri Oct 16 1992 13:007
    re: .2237
    
    Reread my note MtM! We were developing a new indicator if the ex-Cubs
    factor was not applicable in a given year. Sheesh some people :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2239It's almost that time of year again... pick the winner...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 23 1992 12:2415
    
    We need to update this list.  Any predictions?
    
    1992-- Roger is good, but he's no ???? ?????? (sidebar: what a stinking
             bum that Jack Morris is!).
    1991-- Roger is good, but he's no Jack Morris.
    1990-- Roger is good, but he's no Jose Rijo (sidebar: what a choke
             artist that Dave Stewart is!).
    1989-- Roger is good, but he's no Dave Stewart.
    1988-- Roger is good, but he's no Orel Hershiser.
    1987-- Roger is good, but he's no Frank Viola.
    
    
    glenn
    
29.2240easy " No John Smoltz "CNTROL::CHILDSDecked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbestFri Oct 23 1992 12:270
29.2241ROYALT::ASHEBuckner...Eckersley...Reardon?Fri Oct 23 1992 20:033
    The p-name above is a list of ex-Sox who screwed up a World Series
    for their team... any others?
    
29.2242I got a good chuckle out of itCNTROL::CHILDSDecked out like Aces,We'd beat anybody'sbestMon Oct 26 1992 12:404
 Did you guys enjoy the World Series moment they showed saturday nite??

 ;^)
29.2243this is getting oldFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictMon Oct 26 1992 15:091
    So how many more years before the Bambino's curse expires?
29.2244MCIS2::DHAMELThing of beauty and a boy foreverMon Oct 26 1992 14:247
    
    
    >    So how many more years before the Bambino's curse expires?
    
    It expires with the Second Coming of the Bambino to Boston.
    
    
29.2245ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93 == Jake's p-nameMon Oct 26 1992 14:507
    
    re: .2242
    
    Immensely!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2246FRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictMon Oct 26 1992 14:594
    that's too bad.  It's pretty sad when an expansion team does in 16
    years what the BoSox have been trying to do in the last 75 years.
    
    Mike
29.2247Other teams have done it tooSALES::THILLMon Oct 26 1992 15:1323
    re expansion team
    
    The quickest championship for an expansion team was the NY Mets who won
    the whole enchilada in their 8th year, 1969. The Globe had a table with
    the records of various expansion teams, with the best they've ever
    done. From memory it looks something like this:
    
    Team	1st year	best finish	year
    Angels	1961		Div Champs   	1979
    *Rangers	1961		2nd in Div	1974
    Mets	1962		World Champs	1969	8th year
    Astros	1962		Div Champs	1980
    Royals	1969		World Champs	1985    17th year
    +Brewers 	1969		League Champs	1982
    Padres	1969		League Champs	1984
    Expos	1969		Div Champs	1981
    Blue Jays	1977		World Champs	1992    16th year
    Mariners	1977		4th place	19??
    
    Tom
    
    * Originally Washington Senators (2nd edition)
    + Originally Seattle Pilots
29.2248ROYALT::ASHEBuckner...Eckersley...Reardon?Mon Oct 26 1992 20:546
    I was at the Ground Round near Alewife Saturday night.  When the
    flashback came on, everyone booed and hissed or laughed, depening
    on who you rooted for I guess.  Everyone booed and hissed when
    Reardon started warming up in the pen... except for the 2 Jays
    fans who cheered...
    
29.2249CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHMelanie's formula - $70/caseTue Oct 27 1992 13:033
29.2250CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 27 1992 13:0815
>Johnny Pesky


Not!


There was an article the day after that didn't BLAM him, and I recently
saw a special where they talked about the play and said that Pesky
was not too BLAM, someone else was.....


8^)


'Saw
29.2251If it sounds good, run with it...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 27 1992 13:138
    Pesky was not to BLAM, but he still fits in the p-string.  Buckner was
    not so much to BLAM as Schiraldi or Stanley, but then again they didn't 
    auction off the Steamer's wild one at $95,000, either.  Extra points are
    awarded for mythological content...
    
    glenn
    
29.2252Jim Burton, Mike Torrez, Luis Aparicio,YazCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Tue Oct 27 1992 15:171
    
29.2253SALEM::DODAPatriots: Red Sox in helmetsTue Oct 27 1992 15:503
Yaz cost em? when? Add Rich "All-star indeed" Gedman.

daryll
29.2254PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 27 1992 16:002
    Perhaps he was referring to Yaz' popout in the final at bat in the '78
    playoff game.
29.2255Maybe unfairCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Tue Oct 27 1992 16:029
    Yaz,
    Last at bat, 1975 and 1978. Didn't bring the bacon home. Maybe unfair
    'cuz he did fine during the games, but I'll always remember hin making
    the last out ( remember Rooster on third in '78 and the fly to Geronimo
    in '75). 
    
    JMHO
    MikeL
    
29.2256SALEM::DODAPatriots: Red Sox in helmetsTue Oct 27 1992 16:3511
Frankly, I think it is unfair. He didn't cost the sox the game. 

The game was lost earlier in both cases.

Yaz' playoff and WS numbers are excellent. If you toss in the 
final series in '67 and the '78 playoff game, he hit well over 
.400.

But then again, I'm slightly biased.

daryll
29.2257CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Tue Oct 27 1992 16:5410
    I put him in there because he was in a position to win it and didn't.
    Unfair, yes, I'll agree for your reasons. I do not remember him as
    a goat at all, just as the last forelorn figure against the crushing
    weight of the Curse ( how'd i do, 'Saw). 
    
    But I'll still keep him there.
    
    MikeL
    
    
29.2258CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 27 1992 19:467
>    a goat at all, just as the last forelorn figure against the crushing
>    weight of the Curse ( how'd i do, 'Saw). 
    
Classic, MikeL, classic.

The imagery it conjures up is superb......    

29.2259Whatta guy!NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Nov 05 1992 13:069
    Word has it that Roger Clemens has stolen the show both on and off the
    field on the current US All-Stars' trip to Japan.  He closed out his two
    appearances with a 1-0 record, 12 IP, 4 H, 15 Ks, and a 0.00 ERA.  The
    Japanese are enamored with his gracious and accomodating personality,
    bundled up in the new Roger the Inquisitive World Traveler package...
    
    glenn
    
29.2260MCIS2::DHAMELThing of beauty and a boy foreverThu Nov 05 1992 14:153
    
    Has he thrown any egg rolls at the Japanese sportswriters yet?
    
29.2261MCIS2::DHAMELThing of beauty and a boy foreverFri Nov 06 1992 12:227
    
    The Sox announced that they would *not* raise ticket prices nexted
    year.  That means A) They wouldn't dare after last season, B) You
    won't see them sign any decent free agents, C) Both.
    
    Dickstah
    
29.2262Jerk!!CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Nov 18 1992 12:4715
    Anyone care to supply the logic in this draft??
    
    Gorman gives Colorado a Wedgie. This kid hit 5 more homers at
    Fenway in a limited role than WhifferJack did! This guy cain hit.
    How the hail can they project how "bad" his elbow is?
    Stupid, dumb. Lou should be fired.  
    In the second round no less! Who the hail the Sox pull back after Reed
    was lost? This is inexcusable.
    
    Now we get a whole winter of excuses by Sox brass. Gorman be on the
    defensive all year. Nice going Lou. The fans'll be nasty in April.
    
    MikeL
    
    
29.2263Dumb jerkCTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHMelanie's formula - $70/caseWed Nov 18 1992 12:5918
Mikey, I agree. 

I can't understand them not protecting Wedge in the first 
place, but to pass on an opportunity to pull him back?  I
just don't get it.

There is talk (of course denied by Lou Moron-Gorman) that the Red Sox are
pissed at Wedge because he usurped Dr. Pappas for hsi surgery. If this was 
the issue, the Red Sox are cutting off their nose to spite their face, with 
no other catcher in the system. Even if he never catches another game, he 
has a better bat than any DH on the roster.

I dunno, Rich Gedman is a free agent, maybe they are planning on 
signing him.

Looks like I'll be tuning in to TBS this summer.

=Bob=
29.2264Bobby, I heard Rick Cerone is availableCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Nov 18 1992 13:061
    
29.2265I agree MikeL, LOU MUST GO -- NOW!AXIS::CHAPPELCalling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.HowardWed Nov 18 1992 13:200
29.2266Sox sip, that explains it all...AXIS::ROBICHAUDWatchin' Scotty throw...Wed Nov 18 1992 15:121
    
29.2267SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Wed Nov 18 1992 15:173
       How cain you guys say this stuff about Lou? We all know what a judge
    a young talent he is! Why look at how that stiff Bagwell turned out!
                                     Denny
29.2268CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my Hero &amp; MentorWed Nov 18 1992 15:313
you guys and gals could refuse to go to games this year. As long as that
turnstile click 2 + million times a year they aren't going to change their
ways or better yet sell the team....
29.2269SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Wed Nov 18 1992 15:545
       Nobody cain afford to buy the Socks as long as they're in Fenway
    Pahk. The team and Fenway would cost $200 million. Just the interest
    alone would be a killer, then add in the salaries. Who can pay for that
    @3x,000 fans per game?
                              Denny
29.2270CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my Hero &amp; MentorWed Nov 18 1992 16:006
 Denny you telling me that Fenway is worth 194 + million. I subtracted the
 5 + million they pay his Highness cause he's the only value on that sorry
 team....

 ;^)
29.2271Ah, Lou,I REALLY don't mind if ya trade me!!CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Nov 18 1992 16:158
    Interesting point mikey,
    With Rog openly questioning the Sox commitment to winning, wonder 
    if he'll be calling Lou soon. Asking the same questions we are....
    
    
    Hmmmm
    MikeL
    
29.2272I wish they would be sold, and quickly...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Nov 19 1992 16:3720
                                                           
    > Nobody cain afford to buy the Socks as long as they're in Fenway
    > Pahk. The team and Fenway would cost $200 million. Just the interest
    > alone would be a killer, then add in the salaries. Who can pay for that
    > @3x,000 fans per game?
    
    On the other hand, while perhaps they could do better in a larger park,
    that's still one of the highest attendances in baseball.  How do the
    other teams survive?  Add in NESN, good TV and radio deals, and 
    merchandising and the Sox are in the top 5 in baseball in total revenues.
    If the JRY Corp decides it wants to sell the Sox, the price they'll get 
    is what the market will bear, no more, no less.
    
    Make no mistake, the Boston Red Sox are a money-making machine. 
    They've got it too good.  I'd be surprised if the team couldn't find a
    taker for an almost guaranteed $10M/year profit on $80M in revenues. 
    Imagine the possibilities if the team was well-managed!
    
    glenn
    
29.2273the players they lost back then? TRAGIC!!!CNTROL::CHILDSJohn Elway my Hero &amp; MentorThu Nov 19 1992 16:455

That's why Jean should have sold the team to ATT way back when....

mike
29.2274SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Mon Dec 07 1992 14:133
       Heard on the radio this AM that Lou has turned his sights on Mark
    McGwire. He's also close to bringing Bruce Hurst back to Boston.
                                  Denny
29.2275AXIS::ROBICHAUDAHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboroMon Dec 07 1992 15:133
    	Keep selling those tickets Lou...
    
    				/Don
29.2276Hiding out in the 'Sox note. How weak!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Dec 07 1992 15:167
    /Don, I *demand* you move yourself over to note 17 IMMEDIATELY and
    answer the rather serious charges that you've been convicted of lying.
    
    Huf.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
29.2277NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Dec 07 1992 15:177
    
    Stupid bleep.  Lou won't stop until he's totally destroyed what's left
    of this ballclub.  As soon as I heard the name Bruce Hurst I knew there
    was trouble brewing...
    
    glenn
    
29.2278AXIS::ROBICHAUDAHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboroMon Dec 07 1992 15:223
    	Now that you're back, I'm glad I'm leaving CrooKed...
    
    				/Don
29.2279Just come clean Robichaud! (Repeat: GO TAR HEEL!!)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Dec 07 1992 17:185
    Careful, /Don, or I might not write you_a teary-eyed eulogy like I did
    BobHunt. 
    
    
    - ACC Chris
29.2280ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 07 1992 19:525
    
    
    Is he going to claim that Hurst is the lefty that he promised to
    get to replace Hurst?
    
29.2281MCIS2::DHAMELMarge Schott: Designated HitlerTue Dec 08 1992 12:213
    
    The Sox have not offered Wade Boggs arbitration.  He's outa there.
    
29.2282PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 08 1992 15:2610
    Viola was the lefty to replace Hurst.
    
    I can't believe that didn't offer Boggs arbitration.  After what he's
    done for the Sox, they at least owed him that.  Doesn't that mean they
    won't be compensated if Boggs does sign with someone else as a free
    agent?
    
    People talk about lack of loyalty from the players when guys like Hurst
    and Boddicker left.  Where's the squawks about owner and fan loyalty
    when something like this happens?
29.2283ROYALT::ASHEWhat people do... for money...Tue Dec 08 1992 15:342
    Lost when they offered him $9 million for 2 years and he said no, he
    could do better at the start of the season...
29.2284CNTROL::CHILDSI must not think Bad ThoughtsTue Dec 08 1992 15:456
 Boggs has never been loyal to the team so why the heck do they owe him
 anything Mac? He's never ever thought of anybody but himself so I think
 the Soxs did the right thing...

 mike
29.2285PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 08 1992 15:526
    Oh yes, the old tired "selfish Wade" routine.
    
    The guy has always quietly signed his contracts, never attempted to
    renegotiate a contract, took extra fielding and batting practice, led
    his team in runs scored, BA, and OBP for most of his career, and he's
    called selfish.
29.2286CNTROL::CHILDSI must not think Bad ThoughtsTue Dec 08 1992 15:596
that's right Mac. any bum who sits out a game with a fake injury to protect his
batting average is selfish IMO. All that extra batting and crap you spout off
about was done to protect his own individual stats. Especially the fielding 
where he sucked pondwater and had/has the range of three toed sloth....

mike
29.2287They get progressively smallerMSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionTue Dec 08 1992 16:015
    >> Lost when they offered him $9 million for 2 years and he 
    >> said no, he could do better at the start of the season...
    
       Poor Wade. Any DECcie could have told him, "Always take the
       first package."
29.2288PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 08 1992 16:0817
29.2289CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Tue Dec 08 1992 16:0913
    Putting the selfish stuff aside.
    Let me ask a question.
    
    If the Sox opffered arbitration, yet Boggs opted to sign with someone
    else, wouldn't they get two draft choices? Seems to me they should
    have, business-wise, offered the arbitration in trying to garner at
    least a couple of draft choices.
    
    MikeL
    
    BTW, FWIW
    Boggs was selfish between the chalk marks.
    
29.2290See P'NameWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsTue Dec 08 1992 16:149
    
    
            Right and runs scored are because of the players behind him
    he always thought RBI's meant Ruins BOGGS's Individual Stats. Thatsd
    why he never tried to get many....:-)
    
       Wade is Loyal to noone but him self  (ask his wife she'll tell ya)
    
    Chappy
29.2291CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Tue Dec 08 1992 16:185
Mike -

Don't argue with Mac.  He's always right.   

JD
29.2292MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionTue Dec 08 1992 16:238
   Wade rolled the dice and they came up craps. If'n he had hit .360
  instead of .260, he'd be in the drivers seat, but he didn't. Now, he's 
  going to get paid exactly what people think he's worth - no more, no less. 
  Anybody have any idea what third basemen, who hit.260 with no power, have
  the range of a Maytag washer and the foot speed of Tip O'Neil on quaaludes, 
  are going for these days ?
    
29.2293ROYALT::ASHEWhat people do... for money...Tue Dec 08 1992 16:3422
Article 9496 of clari.sports.misc:
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!enterpoop.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!wupost!uunet!looking!clarinews
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (United Press International)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.misc
Subject: Tuesday Sports Transactions
Keywords: misc sports
Message-ID: <transactionsU2D81205pe@clarinet.com>
References: <transactionsU2uS140pe@clarinet.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 92 9:04:49 PST
ACategory: sports
Slugword: transactions
Priority: regular
Format: table
ANPA: Wc: 125; Id: z3253; Sel: xxsz.; Adate: 12-8-1205pes; Ver: 127/0
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Codes: &sz.axx., tnrb...., txia....
Lines: 14

                            Baseball
        Boston -- Traded pitchers Mike Gardiner and Terry Powers to
Montreal for outfielder Ivan Calderon; signed free agent pitcher Scott
Bankhead to a two-year contract.
29.2294Parade in October.....in Toronto!CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Tue Dec 08 1992 16:371
    
29.2295ROYALT::ASHEWhat people do... for money...Tue Dec 08 1992 16:3759
Article 19281 of clari.sports.baseball:
Xref: nntpd.lkg.dec.com clari.sports.baseball:19281 clari.local.massachusetts:747 clari.news.canada:1521
Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!enterpoop.mit.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!wupost!uunet!looking!clarinews
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball,clari.local.massachusetts,clari.news.canada
Subject: Red Sox acquire Calderon, Bankhead
Keywords: baseball, men's professional
Message-ID: <bb-meetings-bostonU2D81158ae@clarinet.com>
References: <bb-meetingsU2D81020ae@clarinet.com> <bb-meetingsU2D3455pe@clarinet.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 92 9:04:49 PST
Location: massachusetts, canada
ACategory: sports
Slugword: bb-meetings-boston
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 365; Id: z3232; Sel: xxsbp; Adate: 12-8-1158aes
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Codes: ysbprxx., &sbprma., &sbprcn., tnrb....
Lines: 36

	LOUISVILLE, Ky. (UPI) -- The Boston Red Sox Tuesday traded pitchers
Mike Gardiner and Terry Powers to Montreal for outfielder Ivan Calderon,
then signed free agent Scott Bankhead to a two-year contract.
	Calderon, 30, appeared in 48 games with Montreal and hit .265 with
three home runs and 24 RBI. On June 24, he had arthroscopic surgey on
his left shoulder and spent most of the year on the disabled list. After
his return from the DL in September, Calderon batted .305 the rest of
the season.
	In 1991, Calderon led Montreal with a .300 average, 19 home runs and
75 RBI in 134 games. He was selected to the National League All-Star
team that year as well.
	A nine-year major league veteran, Calderon has a .277 lifetime
average with 103 home runs and 422 RBI in 842 games. He played for
Seattle from 1984-86, the Chicago White Sox from 1986-90, and Montreal
from 1991-92.
	``Ivan gives us a solid contact hitter with some power and a player
who can drive in runs,'' Boston general manager Lou Gorman said. ``He
will be used primarily as a DH (designated hitter) and also play some
outfield.''
	Gardiner, acquired by the Red Sox from Seattle prior to the 1991
season, was 9-10 with a 4.85 ERA in 22 starts in 1991, and 4-10 with a
4.75 ERA in 28 games in 1992.
	Powers, 21, was the Red Sox's 10th round pick in the June 1990 draft.
In 21 starts for Winter Haven in '92, he was 5-10 with a 4.51 ERA.
	Bankhead, 29, who pitched for Cincinnati this season, agreed to a
two-year deal. Terms were not disclosed.
	He was 10-4 with a 2.93 ERA and one save in 54 relief appearances
with the Reds, holding opponents to a .218 batting average against. He
won eight of his first nine decisions, and was 9-2 with a 1.94 ERA at
the All-Star break.
	Bankhead began his major league career with Kansas City in 1986. He
was a first-round pick in the June 1984 draft out of the University of
North Carolina.
	``Scott is a very versatile pitcher who can be used as either a
reliever or a starter,'' Gorman said. ``He is an outstanding athlete and
competitor. He will add additional depth overall to our pitching staff.''


    
29.2296You can get lots of RBI's that way tooPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 08 1992 16:386
29.2297HmmmmmmmmmmmmmWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsTue Dec 08 1992 17:086
    
    
    Hr?????  :-)
    
             BTW I believe Calderon's contract is at 3 Mil a year. What a
    deal huh?
29.2298As old as baseball itselfNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Dec 08 1992 17:368
    
> that's right Mac. any bum who sits out a game with a fake injury to protect his
> batting average is selfish IMO.
    
    Like George Brett did two years ago?  He admitted it!
    
    glenn
    
29.2299CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsTue Dec 08 1992 17:4212
>> that's right Mac. any bum who sits out a game with a fake injury to protect his
>> batting average is selfish IMO.
>    
>    Like George Brett did two years ago?  He admitted it!
    
Not many guys left like the Splendid Splinter, who played the second
game of a double header after finishing the first at .401.  A manly
man, he finished at .406....


'Saw    

29.2300feel better Glenn? :^)CNTROL::CHILDSI must not think Bad ThoughtsTue Dec 08 1992 17:501
Geroge Brett is a shelfish bum....
29.2301Hope his wife ain't allergic to shelfish 8^)CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Tue Dec 08 1992 18:021
    
29.2302ROYALT::ASHETue Dec 08 1992 18:372
    At least he was man enough to admit he was a selfish bum...
    
29.2303I think not!!!!!WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsTue Dec 08 1992 19:3510
    
    
           Besides if we are talking about 1986 when The Wade man sat out
    the last 4 games of the season against the Yanks when Donbo was just
    three points behind him for the batting title.
    
              Wade reported he had a hamstring pull. But he than went on to
    steal a base in the 3rd inning of the 1st playoff game. He must be a
    fast healer Huh!
    
29.2304ROYALT::ASHEWed Dec 09 1992 16:232
    Randy Myers signed today.... with the Cubs...
    
29.2305But where will we play him...for realSALES::THILLWed Dec 09 1992 18:114
    I heard on WBCN that the Soxes signed Andre Dawson....and were "about
    to sign" Tom Henke...
    
    Tom
29.2306CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Thu Dec 10 1992 13:358
    Melendez,Fletcher,Calderon,Bankhead,Dawson.
    
    Rumor has it that the Sox will tender offers to anyone who played
    in the now defunct Senior League. Middle relievers and outfielders
    are especially needed.
    
    MikeL
    
29.2307So much for reducing the payroll, LouSALES::THILLThu Dec 10 1992 13:416
    I soar on the news lasted night that the Soxes dumped about $10.5
    million in salaries, but added $12.5 million. This is including $3.3
    million for Henke, which people seem to think is almost a done deal.
    Then again, I heard that 3 other teams were in the running....
    
    Tom
29.2308AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlewThu Dec 10 1992 14:534
    	Same old Sox.  Building a team that will sell tickets in December
    not win pennants in October...
    
    				/Don
29.2309ROYALT::ASHEThu Dec 10 1992 15:322
    People in Texas think they've got a shot at Henke too...
    
29.2310CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Thu Dec 10 1992 15:514
I'm glad I didn't say that /Don.  I'd be accussed of war crimes or
something by the fearsome-twosome.

JD
29.2311:^)GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPCG Product ManagementThu Dec 10 1992 15:594
    JD, you just gotsta get your money back on that Dale Carnegie course
    you took.
    
    Mark.
29.2312Is Hoyt Wilhelm available?CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Thu Dec 10 1992 18:052
Henke definitely qualifies as someone the Red Sox should go after - he's 38, and
has his best years behind him...
29.2313ROYALT::ASHEThu Dec 10 1992 19:102
    I thought he was only 35...
    
29.2314CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Thu Dec 10 1992 19:143
29.2315PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 10 1992 20:093
    Melendez is only 27.
    
    What's next, Lou?  Going to recruit from the Gray Sox?
29.2316SCHOOL::RIEULife after DEC!Fri Dec 11 1992 12:293
       Every Sox game is also a old timers game! Maybe they'll charge 2
    admissions!
                               Denny
29.2317ROYALT::ASHEFri Dec 11 1992 13:592
    They missed Tanana... he signed with the Mets...
    
29.2318but they found this oneACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 01:287
    
    In a move guaranteed to solve all their problems, the Red Sox signed:
    
    Bob Melvin
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2319WHO?!FRETZ::HEISERarms raised in a VTue Dec 15 1992 03:181
    
29.2320ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 03:576
    I know he was a backup on the SF Giants, spent time in KC, and I think
    1 or 2 other cities - most definitely the franchise type player the Red
    Sox have been looking for :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
29.2321CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Tue Dec 15 1992 11:457
;-)

Melvin is the 'catcherbetterthanSteinbach' that Lou Gorman promised!  ;-)

Parade down 5th avenue in November!!! (Sponsered by Macy's!)

JD
29.2322ROYALT::ASHETue Dec 15 1992 13:012
    He spent some time in Bal'mo' too..
    
29.2323PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Dec 15 1992 15:226
29.2324AXIS::ROBICHAUDScott...NOT! JeffCarlsonIsOurHeroTue Dec 15 1992 15:383
    	Great!  I got Bob Melvin's rookie card!
    
    				/Don_for_Denny
29.2325TORREY::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanTue Dec 15 1992 20:382
    
    Hey TCM, tell us about those great MEts signings.
29.2326METSNY::francusMets in '93Tue Dec 15 1992 20:4611
Brews, back in October I was hoping (see NYM notesfile) that the Mets would
not make radical changes. Sure the Mets were mediocre in 1992, but a good
option was to let a team that underwent radical changes after the 1991
season to gel into a team for the 1993 season. Mets have question marks:
Gooden, Saberhagen, HoJo, Bonilla to some extent. They made a good move
in picking up Tony Fernandez. The Mets, unlike the Red Sox, never made
any commitment to make wholesale changes via trades or the free agent market
for the 1993 season. It is in that context that the Red Sox have made some
bonehead, or at the very least questionable, moves.

The Crazy Met
29.2327TORREY::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanTue Dec 15 1992 20:533
    bonehead moves?
    
    look at the '86 team that was to "contend for years." Wha happened?
29.2328ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Wed Dec 16 1992 00:2210
    Yeah Mets made some real bad moves as well. But consider that the 1986
    team contended in 1987, won the division in 1988, contended in 1989 and
    1990 and then fell apart in late August of 1991. Not too shabby. Not
    you said contend and that is what I am responding too. 1986-1990 is
    5 years. Go back to 1984 and that was 7 years.
    
    Also consider that whether or not the Mets made bad moves it does not
    in anyway justify what the Red Sox did or did not do.
    
    The Crazy Met
29.2329PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 16 1992 13:064
    Allegedly the Sox were offered Fernandez but declined because they were
    looking for an outfielder.  Let's see.  They have about 20 OF/DH/1B
    types and 1 legit shortstop who hasn't played a full season in the
    major leagues.
29.2330AXIS::ROBICHAUDScott...NOT! JeffCarlsonIsOurHeroWed Dec 16 1992 15:025
    	WEEI's morning drive time DJs are having a "Boggs Bash" this
    Friday night somewhere near Boston.  I hear that Dan Schneider is
    driving up for the occasion.   
    
    				/Don
29.2331Brain crampSHARE::DERRYEggnog? Ick.Fri Dec 18 1992 09:512
    So the Sox, who had to keep Burks on the very very protected list, now
    let him go and get zilch in return.    
29.2332METSNY::francusMets in '93Fri Dec 18 1992 11:449
re :. 2331

But, but, but its all part of ....


The Plan


The Crazy Met
29.2333uhSALEM::DODASave the wailsFri Dec 18 1992 13:061
I thought Burks was left unprotected and nobody wanted him?
29.2334Stoopider and stoopiderCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Fri Dec 18 1992 13:2514
29.2335Yes, stoopid indeed...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Dec 18 1992 13:3724
                  
    Actually, Bob, the Sox only protected Burks after the round in which
    Wedge was taken.  That doesn't prove much, though.  Burks is not the
    kind of player that the expansion clubs were after (Wedge is, dammit!),
    but that doesn't mean there is no interest in him.  There is.
    
    The Sox let Burks go because he's one of the few guys with a decent
    salary which isn't guaranteed.  A healthy Burks is needed by the Sox
    much more than $3M Mike Greenwell, especially with Ivan Calderon on the
    scene.  There is no interest in Greenwell at that price.  Keep that in 
    mind the next time the Red Sox PR machine springs into action, claiming 
    that Greenie is swinging the bat really well and he's healthy and 
    excited about the 1993 season.  After all, it was only a month ago that
    the Sox claimed that Burks' medical prognosis was encouraging.  Hell,
    half this team will spend a third of the season in the doctor's office,
    so you can't tell me that Burks is the exception.
    
    Yes, this ballclub is clueless.  By June, Ivan Calderon will be in
    centerfield, breaking in on balls that are hit over his head, with the
    Fenway patrons rolling the aisles with laughter (but only to keep from
    crying).
    
    glenn
      
29.2336CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Fri Dec 18 1992 13:507
29.2338Had to be said...ICS::FINUCANEFri Dec 18 1992 15:186
    
    Sox management/DEC management....
    
    One in the same?  8-}
    
    C                 
29.2339MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionTue Dec 22 1992 11:5518
   And now from the "Is This Guy For Real ?" Dept...

    Ole Wade now says that his back problems may have been stress 
   related. Wade says that his back stiffened up immediately after
   a reporter informed him that Clemens said he believed Boggs was
   not behind him in his quest for a fourth Cy Young Award because
   Boggs questioned a scoring decision that was reversed and cost 
   Clemens two earned runs. 
   
    "By the time I got to the clubhouse, I sat down and I could bare-
    ly move," Boggs said.
    
    


   
     
    
29.2340Wade does New YawkCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHMelanie ate baby food!!!Tue Dec 22 1992 12:2510
RE: -1

As indicated in Nick Cafardo's column in the Boston Globe today, the NY media is
going to LOVE this guy.

Pyscosematic bad backs, willing himslf invisible, falling out of jeeps, 
Margogate, all "who cares" stuff to most, but definite back page material for 
the Daily News.

=Bob=
29.2341LAGUNA::MAY_BRjust another maytag salesmanTue Dec 22 1992 12:294
    
    I guess Wade has proven the old adage that the truth hurts.
    
    Brews
29.2342PLUGH::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says &quot;Good-Bye!&quot;Tue Dec 22 1992 19:414
Gee, I read the paper quickly this morning and I thought it said that Wade sat
out alot because he was a stiff.

j.
29.2343Psychosomatic bad back... The dude's twistedCTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Tue Dec 22 1992 19:5910
    As was said before,
    Then Noo Yawk press is gonna love this guy. Best thing for his career,
    he'll remake the Daily News and the Post. Can't wait until he starts
    talking in the third person. Don Imus  will have a field
    day on FAN. Too bad Howard Stern ain't at WOR anymore. Wade woulda fit
    in quite well. 
    Open up your doors, George, here comes your new eccentric!
    
    MikeL
     
29.2344SHARE::DERRYEggnog? Ick.Wed Dec 30 1992 10:485
    Rog notified the team that he'll show up for camp at least 10 days
    later than the other pitchers and catchers.
    
    Wonder if this is going to be the top story, for days, come late
    February...
29.2345CNTROL::CHILDSPete Pavia a true American HeroWed Dec 30 1992 10:557
think the extra 10 days off are his way of protesting the Soxs letting go of
Boggs??

Don't think so, he probably needs the 10 days to sober up from all the partying
he'll be doing to celebrate the release of Boggs...

I hope like heck he beans Boggs this coming year....make him a real SuperHero
29.2346Expecting (hoping for?) the typical Sox overreaction...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Dec 30 1992 12:1113
    
    Without making a real ugly scene of it, Clemens is doing what he can
    here and there in an effort to get himself traded.  Who can blame him?
    He's already seen what getting on village idiot Butch Hobson's bad side
    did for Phil Plantier and a host of others.  Anyway, trading Clemens 
    would be the final master stroke in Lou Gorman's ingenious plan to make 
    the Red Sox cellar-dwellers for the next decade to come.  What the
    hell; I'm so disgusted with the Red Sox at this point that I almost
    wouldn't mind the thought of Clemens pounding the Sox 4-5 times a year
    as he moves on to the higher things that the Sox can't give him...
    
    glenn
     
29.2347ANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Wed Dec 30 1992 12:216
    Hmmm, he could be the one starter the Twins are looking for.
    
    ;*)
    
    
    Spud
29.2348AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlewWed Dec 30 1992 14:484
    	Well Glenn, at least if the Sox traded Roger, MikeC would stop
    chastising him.  
    
    				/Don
29.2349don't do it LouCNTROL::CHILDSLiz Smith wants Madonna's bodyWed Dec 30 1992 15:205
If they trade Roger, I'm going to cry. He's been more fun for me than any
other player in the league.

mike
29.2350Just wondering...:-)WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MNo. 3 Looms over FENWAYWed Dec 30 1992 18:073
    
    
      So will Rog be wearing # 26 on his uni this spring?
29.2351backwards for BurksSALEM::KUPTONRed Sox - More My AgeWed Dec 30 1992 18:151
    nope....12
29.2352AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlewWed Dec 30 1992 18:225
    	Roger will be wearing #65.  The minimum age a player has to be
    before the Sox are interested in him.  The Sox insurance costs should
    plummet since half the team is eligible MediCare.
    
    				/Don
29.2353CNTROL::CHILDSLiz Smith wants Madonna's bodyWed Dec 30 1992 18:233
still got your sense of humor Slasher, good to see....

;^)
29.2354ROYALT::ASHEMon Jan 04 1993 19:592
    Burks signed today with the ChiSox...
    
29.2355Look up in the sky !! It's Willy in the flesh.SALEM::STIGHe died for you n' meMon Jan 04 1993 23:522
    Really??  Maybe he'll finally be the second coming of Willy Mays. The
    Red Sox thought that..didn't they ???...