[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_91

Title:CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid
Notice:This file has been archived. New notes to CAM3::SPORTS.
Moderator:CAM3::WAY
Created:Fri Dec 21 1990
Last Modified:Mon Nov 01 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:290
Total number of notes:84103

15.0. "Big Ten Basketball" by CAM::WAY (Futue te ipsum et caballum tuum) Fri Dec 21 1990 15:37

This note is for discussion of Big Ten Basketball.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
15.1Preseason Big10 PixITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Jan 03 1991 17:5324
    Whoa the Hurryin' Hoosiers look like they might be reel what with 
    the blowout of the admittedly rebuilding Illini last night.  First
    congrat's to ESPN for not broadcasting any Big10 hoops this year,
    I enjoy watching ACC action night in night out nonstop.
    
    But cain the Hoosiers do well against teams with big quick front-
    lines?  Probably not, cuz a: 1) no middlemain, 2) thin at forward
    with no good subs behind Calbert & Eric, and 3) shaky outside shooting
    from a guard-orientated squad.  But, on the other hand they have two
    fine forwards, a bus load a guards, and play tough D.  Oh, and they
    have the best coach ever in the annals of team sports.
    
    Final preconference pix:
    
    1.  Buckeyes (Jim is God and the reast ain't to shabby either)
    2.  State (Peplowski and other young players will come on strong)
    3.  Hoosiers (Big10 familiar with how to zone Hoosiers into losses)
    4.  Illini (don't let last night fool ya)
    5.  Iowa  (they have the hot center looks like)
    6.  Michigan (stupidest coach ever, even by Ann Arbor's low standards)
    7.  Minnesota (young talent)
    8.  Purdue (Gene will find a way he always does)
    9.  Wisconsin (bye bye Yoder!)
    10. Mildcats (a_already bad team made wretched by defections)
15.2ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYMe so thornyTue Jan 08 1991 18:084
    Damn.  I knew that Big10 hoops was down this year but one note
    in one week?!
    
    Big10 Tom
15.3SACT41::ROSSBush will wimp outTue Jan 08 1991 19:0734
Okay, MrT, I'll join in...

I can't track down my pre-season picks, but I think the top three were
Ohio State, Michigan State, and IU in that order.  Here's my pre-Big10
revised picks:

15-3   *Indiana 	: They have the depth, they have the coach, there
			  isn't a whole lot of size in the Big 10 this year,
			  and they have Calbert and Damon;
14-4   *Ohio State      : They don't have the depth that IU has and foul
			  trouble {which is common in the Big 10} will cost
			  them a couple games;  
13-5   *Michigan State  : By default;  They haven't shown any signs of
			  repeating yet;  Missing some solid team players;

10-8   *Iowa            : They've been the surprise team so far;
 9-9   *Illinois        : Better than expected;  Unless Coach Lou finds a
			  way to screw them up;  Thomas is a budding star;
 8-10	Purdue          : Gene will use this season to prep for next year
 8-10	Minnesota       : Lost to Wisconsin?
 6-12	Wisconsin       : Beat Minnesota?
 5-13	Michigan        : Haw Haw Haw... The joke is that Fisher is a worse
			  coach than Freider!   Nothing like taking over a 
			  team with 5 NBA players and turning that into a
			  multi-year contract.
 2-16	Northwestern    : But they'll lead the league in future Tony awards	


* = Tournament Teams


Big game next Monday with the Hoosiers travelling to West Lafayette to 
face a weak Boilermaker team.   A big win by Bob might set the stage for
a championship run.   A loss might cause me to reassess.
15.4OTHER going home?CSOA1::SIMPSON_TWed Jan 09 1991 16:257
	Wandering hoopster Lawrence Funderburke (unaffectionately known as 
"other" in Indiana's statistical summary for the '89-'90 season) is expected 
to enroll for the second semester at Ohio State.  Funderburke would be 
eligible to play beginning the second semester of next year, and would have 
2.5 years of eligibility remaining.

tom
15.5MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: 1990 NoTYWed Jan 09 1991 18:3720
    That's bad news.  The last thing we need is ThunderBurp over in 
    St. John Arena tearing up the paint on behalf of a non-IU squad...
    Deon Thomas' play thus far explains why all the fuss, he's pure
    STUD... Gibbons rates Purdue's recruit #1 in the nation and 
    Henderson only 7th... Michigan looks like they'll end up with the
    #1 recruiting class in the nation... Minnesota will start playing
    Ernest Nsigamasabo more, he's the 6-10 Watusi from Burundi who's
    only played hoops for 3 years, a 4.0 GPA in engineering who speaks
    6 languages and popped the 1400 mark on his SATs (should catch on
    reel quick)... Alan Henderson is a 3.8 1300+ Nat'l Honors Society
    student at Brebeuf, perhaps the top prep school in Indiana... Acie
    Earl is doing very well for Iowa in the middle this year and is now
    regarded by many as the best center in the conference...  Iowa is 
    also ranked in the top few for overall recruiting classes... Clem
    Haskins of Minnesota is working very hard to sign Chris Weber, and
    is reportedly down to the final 3 with State and Michigan (Michigan
    is favored)... 
    
    Big10 Tom
     
15.6QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Wed Jan 09 1991 18:4712
15.7Big Ten Update 1-10-91FORTSC::MOKThu Jan 10 1991 16:2940
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-10-91)  NCAA
Date: 10 Jan 91 16:12:41 GMT
 
Tonight:
 
	#64 Minnesota at #67 ILLINOIS            7:00 pm
	#69 Michigan at #42 IOWA                 7:00 pm
	#68 Wisconsin at #24 MICHIGAN STATE      7:00 pm
	#5  Ohio State at #241 NORTHWESTERN      7:00 pm
  
Saturday:
 
	#42  Iowa at #64 MINNESOTA                1:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#241 Northwestern at #24 MICHIGAN STATE   3:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#68  Wisconsin at #5 OHIO STATE           7:00 pm
	#69  Michigan at #33 PURDUE               7:00 pm
 
Monday:
 
	#6 Indiana at #33 PURDUE               8:30 pm  ESPN 
 
RECORDS:
 
    #5    Ohio State        12-0    2-0
    #6    Indiana           14-1    2-0
    #68   Wisconsin          7-4    1-0
    #42   Iowa              12-2    1-1
    #33   Purdue             9-3    1-1
    #67   Illinois          11-4    1-1
    #24   Michigan State     8-4    1-1
    #64   Minnesota          7-4    0-1
    #69   Michigan           7-5    0-2
    #241  Northwestern       5-6    0-2
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler                        peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu |
| Illinois State Water Survey      or: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu        |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15.8SACT41::ROSSLuck be a lady tonightFri Jan 11 1991 11:2519
Last night in the Big 10:

Minnesota  at ILLINOIS           Illinois won  67-66
Michigan   at IOWA               Iowa     won  79-78  
Wisconsin  at MICHIGAN STATE     Mich St  won  65-50   
Ohio State at NORTHWESTERN       Ohio St  won 102-60  

RECORDS:
 
Ohio State        13-0    3-0
Indiana           14-1    2-0
Iowa              13-2    2-1
Illinois          12-4    2-1
Michigan State     9-4    2-1
Purdue             9-3    1-1
Wisconsin          7-5    1-1
Minnesota          7-5    0-2
Michigan           7-6    0-3
Northwestern       5-7    0-3
15.9CARP::SHAUGHNESSYQUICK! Jump into debunker now!Fri Jan 11 1991 14:035
    Boy, Illinois and Minnesota are badly underrated to be way down
    in the 60s.  Both teams are young, both, especially the Illini,
    have big-time talent. 
    
    Big10 Tom
15.10SACT41::ROSSLuck be a lady tonightFri Jan 11 1991 14:158
So, MrT, when is Minnesota going to do something with all that talent you
talk about?   7-5 is not exactly lighting the world on fire.   They aren't
even much of a threat to go to the NCAA's unless they start winning some
road games in the Big 10.

Illinois and Iowa, unfortunately, seem to be much better than predicted.
Michigan, gleefully, seems worse.   If Fisher doesn't get Chris Weber, does
he lose his job as well?
15.11Golden Goofers Need Time Is AllCARP::SHAUGHNESSYQUICK! Jump into debunker now!Fri Jan 11 1991 17:1722
    Remember first that Clem & Co. have played two road games thus far
    in the Big10 (@ Madison and Champaign).  Second, this team is
    extremely young, basically all first year players except for three
    players:
    
    - Kevin Lynch, big guard who was a role player now thrust into 
      position of go-to guy, and he's fumbling.
    
    - Walter Bond, swingman former role player who's now trying to act
      as if he's Willie Burton.  Bond is OK but no star, especially on
      offense.  Important to note that as a key player he's missed most
      of the year with a foot injury (he's just back now).
    
    - Bob Martin, 9 ft. tall center, has played well occasionally (as
      he did against Ga. Tech in the regional finals last year) but is
      basically a foul-prone no-rebound no-defense stiff.
    
    So Clem needs time, time to break in Ernest Nsigamasabo in the middle,
    time to break in Arriel McDonald on the point, time to break in his
    book-end forwards Carter and Jackson up front.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.12SACT41::ROSSLesboscious!Mon Jan 14 1991 12:0829
Saturday:
 
Minnesota   79  Iowa           77   But can Gophers win on road?  
Mich State  66  Northwestern   59   Wow!  Michigan State is really not as
			            expected.   This was a home game.
Ohio State  92  Wisconsin      60   It's a two team race in the Big 10
Purdue      86  Michigan       69   Any win is a big win for Purdue now, but
				    the spread is very surprising {but
				    gratifying!}
 

RECORDS:
 
Ohio State        14-0    4-0
Indiana           14-1    2-0
Michigan State    10-4    3-1
Purdue            10-3    2-1
Illinois          12-4    2-1
Iowa              13-3    2-2
Wisconsin          7-6    1-2
Minnesota          8-5    1-2
Michigan           7-7    0-4
Northwestern       5-8    0-4


Tonight, the game of the year {for me}... On national TV.   Bob vs Gene.

	#6 Indiana at #33 PURDUE               8:30 pm  ESPN 
 
15.13Purdue Powerhouse?CARP::SHAUGHNESSYAD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989Mon Jan 14 1991 13:437
    Well well, turns out that we all were hoodwinked by what has come
    to be the perenniel blooming of blossomus poormouthicus in the
    garden tended by Purdue Alumni.  Are the Boilermakers a threat for
    the Big10 Crown?!  Peut etre.  We shall see tonight as the Farm 
    Implements host Bob's elegant team of transition gamecocks.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.14SACT41::ROSSLesboscious!Mon Jan 14 1991 14:3913
>   <<< Note 15.13 by CARP::SHAUGHNESSY "AD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989" >>>
>                            -< Purdue Powerhouse? >-
>
>    Well well, turns out that we all were hoodwinked by what has come
>    to be the perenniel blooming of blossomus poormouthicus in the
>    garden tended by Purdue Alumni.  Are the Boilermakers a threat for
>   the Big10 Crown?!  Peut etre.  

Seems like MrT is trying to put the pregame spin-control on... If the
Boilers win, it will be a major upset.   Indiana should be favored by
at least 10.     Purdue is without their starting point guard {Woody
Austin - academics} and has no size, no speed, and little experience.

15.15i seeCARP::SHAUGHNESSYAD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989Mon Jan 14 1991 15:254
    So then, what you're saying, Mr. Farm Implement, is that these Big10
    victories by Purdue are mass hallucinations?
    
    Big10 Tom
15.16Big Ten Update 1-11-91FORTSC::MOKMon Jan 14 1991 23:5386
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-11-91)  NCAA
Date: 11 Jan 91 21:40:04 GMT
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#67 ILLINOIS 67, #64 Minnesota 66:  Lightning struck again in
	Assembly Hall, as Rennie Clemons sank a one-handed prayer and
	subsequent winning free throw with 3.2 seconds left for another
	come-from-behind win.  The Gophers, which were blown out of Wisconsin
	Fieldhouse on Monday, were helped by poor Illinois shooting early
	on, and led most of this game, sometimes by as many as 13 points in
	the second half.  But, just like Purdue Saturday, they could not
	hold on down the stretch.  The Gophers missed some key free throws
	late, but what else is new.  Lou Henson looked like he had just won the
	lottery when Clemons' shot fell, a shot which only Michael Jordan is
	supposed to make.  The Gophers also had big first half leads, once
	of 23-15.  Andy Kaufmann came back after a cold first half to do
	some second half damage.  This is the third straight home game which
	has been preceded by an ice storm...
 
#42 IOWA 79, #69 Michigan 78:  Michigan jumped ahead 12-zip, and set
	the tone for a very exciting and close game at Iowa.  Iowa managed
	to establish a 64-56 lead toward the later stages of the game, but
	the Wolverines tied it up at 71 with 3:25 left, and it wasn't until
	a Val Barnes basket (76-75) that Iowa was up for good.  Barnes had
	17, Rodell Davis 22, and Acie Earl 15 for Iowa, while scoring
	machine Demetrious Calip led Michigan with 23.  This was by far the
	Wolverines best conference game to date...
 
#24 MICHIGAN STATE 65, #68 Wisconsin 50:  This game was played at
	Wisconsin's pace, but the Spartans were just too much at home.  The
	fiesty Badgers actually led by 24-23 at halftime in what must have
	been frustration for the big crowd.  The Badgers widened the lead to
	30-25 early in the second stanza before the Spartans went on a 17-3
	run (42-33) to settle things.  Steve Smith scored 21 and Mike
	Peplowski 19, a career high...
 
#5  Ohio State 102, #241 NORTHWESTERN 62:  The Wildcats were beaten
	by 40+ points for the second consecutive game.  OSU led 44-26 at
	halftime, and outscored NU 25-4 in the early stages of the second
	half to really put it away (69-30).  Jim Jackson had 23 points, 17
	in the second half (as usual).  Northwestern may go winless in the
	conference this year...
 
 
 
Saturday:
 
	#42  Iowa at #64 MINNESOTA                1:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#241 Northwestern at #24 MICHIGAN STATE   3:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#68  Wisconsin at #5 OHIO STATE           7:00 pm
	#69  Michigan at #33 PURDUE               7:00 pm
 
 
Monday:
 
	#6   Indiana at #33 PURDUE                8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
Thursday:
 
	#24  Michigan State at #67 ILLINOIS       7:00 pm
	#42  Iowa at #68 WISCONSIN                7:00 pm
	#241 Northwestern at #69 MICHIGAN         7:00 pm
	#33  Purdue at #64 MINNESOTA              7:00 pm
 
 
RECORDS:
 
    #5    Ohio State        13-0    3-0
    #6    Indiana           14-1    2-0
    #42   Iowa              13-2    2-1
    #67   Illinois          12-4    2-1
    #24   Michigan State     9-4    2-1
    #33   Purdue             9-3    1-1
    #68   Wisconsin          7-5    1-1
    #64   Minnesota          7-5    0-2
    #69   Michigan           7-6    0-3
    #241  Northwestern       5-7    0-3
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler                        peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu |
| Illinois State Water Survey      or: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu        |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15.17Big Ten Update 1-14-91FORTSC::MOKMon Jan 14 1991 23:55107
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-14-91)  NCAA
Date: 14 Jan 91 19:17:11 GMT
 
Don't forget to watch tonight's second part of Big Monday, as Purdue
hosts Indiana in one of the most (if not most) intense college
basketball rivalries in the country...  8:30 pm Central Time with Dick
and Mike...
 
In the interesting stat department, of the 18 conference games played so
far, the road team has only won three times:  Purdue and Ohio State at
Northwestern, and Ohio State at Michigan.  This in contrast to some
recent seasons where The Road Warrior has existed...
 
 
Saturday's Results:
 
#64 MINNESOTA 79, #42 Iowa 77:  The Gophers and Hawkeyes reversed
	cliffhanger roles from last Thursday night, as Dana Jackson tipped
	in a missed driving shot by Arriel McDonald, over Acie Earl, with
	just 1.3 ticks left to win it for Minnesota.  The Hawkeyes blew a
	43-31 halftime lead as the Gophers averted losing their third
	straight home game.  This was Iowa's 13th straight Big Ten road
	loss, a rather remarkable streak which should end soon I would
	think.  The Gophers won this one from the field, scoring four more
	treys than Iowa.  The Hawkeyes took 28 FTs to just 11 for Minnesota,
	but missed 8 of them.  Kevin Lynch led the Gophers with 26 points,
	while Walter Bond had 17.  Jackson had 10.  Iowa was led by Val
	Barnes (a juco, in case some of you don't know him;  you will soon)
	with 24, and Earl had 17.  16,555 raucaus fans on hand at The Barn...
 
#24 MICHIGAN STATE 66, #241 Northwestern 59:  The Spartans struggled
	all game against a Wilcat team which had just been beaten by Indiana
	and Ohio State by a combined 81 points.  The Spartans led by only
	six at the break and still only by four within the final few
	minutes, but hung on.  Steve Smith led MSU with 23 points and Mike
	Peplowski, who may be waking up, had 17 points and 11 boards.  Todd
	Leslie had 22 for NU in what can be considered a moral victory.
	Another sellout of 15,138 at the Breslin Center...
 
#5  OHIO STATE 92, #68 Wisconsin 60:  After playing it Wisconsin's way
	in the first half (slow), the Buckeyes forced the second half
	action and routed the Badgers.  Leading just 32-25 at the break, the
	Buckeyes opened huge second half leads, once of 82-48.  OSU scored
	the final 8 points of the first half and the first 9 of the second
	half to decide this game.  Jim Jackson had 7 of his 17 during this
	stretch.  Perry Carter scored 18 and Treg Lee and Jamaal Brown each
	had 13.  Mark Baker had 11 assists to go with 11 points.  Wisconsin
	was led by the baseball players' son, Larry Hisle, with 12.  OSU was
	only whistled 9 times in this game.  Another sellout of 13,276 at
	St. Johns Arena...
 
#33 PURDUE 86, #69 Michigan 69:  This was blowout city as the
	Wolverines dropped their fourth straight conference game.  Purdue
	jumped ahead 10-5, and Michigan closed to 10-9.  But that's as close
	as it ever got.  Purdue led 19-12, 33-19, 35-27, and then 46-31 at
	the break.  The rout continued in the second half, as Purdue raced
	ahead 62-37, and at the peak, 69-43, before Michigan hit several
	treys in the final five minutes to narrow the gap to it's final
	margin.  Purdue had nearly a dozen dunks in this game, as it had no
	trouble beating a porous Michigan defense.  Jimmy Oliver hit a
	career-high 35 points as the Boilermakers ran wild.  Demetrius
	Calip was a one-man show for a beleaguered Steve Fisher, scoring 26
	and being the only Wolverine in double-figures (second straight
	Purdue opponent to do so).  Michael Talley was next highest at 9.
	Eric Riley was outplayed by Craig Riley, if you can believe that.
	Chuckie White continued his tear, scoring 16, and with Oliver, led
	the dunk parade.  As at times last year, the Wolverines appeared to
	throw in the towel once things got bad.  Steve Fisher may need some
	tutiledge in motivation from Bo..  This was nice for a change:  each
	team committed the same number of fouls (19) and took nearly the
	same number of FTs (21 and 20).  By comparison, in two recent
	cliffhanger home wins, Illinois outshot the opposition from the line
	60 to 23.  14,123 at Mackey, as always...
 
 
Tonight:
 
	#6   Indiana at #33 PURDUE                8:30 pm CST  ESPN
 
 
Thursday:
 
	#24  Michigan State at #67 ILLINOIS       7:00 pm
	#42  Iowa at #68 WISCONSIN                7:00 pm
	#241 Northwestern at #69 MICHIGAN         7:00 pm
	#33  Purdue at #64 MINNESOTA              7:00 pm
 
 
RECORDS:
 
    #5    Ohio State        14-0    4-0
    #6    Indiana           14-1    2-0
    #24   Michigan State    10-4    3-1
    #33   Purdue            10-3    2-1
    #67   Illinois          12-4    2-1
	#42   Iowa              13-3    2-2
    #64   Minnesota          8-5    1-2
    #68   Wisconsin          7-6    1-2
    #69   Michigan           7-7    0-4
    #241  Northwestern       5-8    0-4
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler                        peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu |
| Illinois State Water Survey      or: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu        |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15.18This is what hoop is all aboutSACT41::ROSSIf war, who'll run 7-11's?Tue Jan 15 1991 10:2628
Indiana beat Purdue last night 65-62 in a great game.   IU charged to an 
early 12-2 lead but Purdue slowly chipped away at the lead due mostly to 
foul trouble on Cheaney and Anderson.   After being down by 6 at the half,
Purdue battled to take the lead with about twelve minutes to go.  Knight
then put Anderson and Cheaney back into the game and they took over down
the stretch, especially Anderson, hitting big shots.   Purdue had a chance
to shoot for the tie when Jamaal Meeks bricked two free throws with 6 seconds
left, but the Purdue freshman guard Travis Trice fumbled the ball up the court
and never got a shot off.

Before MrT gloats too much, he should asked himself the following question,
"Which of Purdue's starters would start for IU?"   When he objectively 
answers that question as "None" then he should offer praise to Gene Keady
for the job he does.   Keady is now 10-11 lifetime against Knight.

As for the Boilermakers, I saw a lot of good things to look forward to 
next year.   Cornelius McNary, Ian Stanback and recruit Glenn Robinson 
should make for a very good front line.   Unfortunately, the guard situation
is horrible.   Barrett, Painter, Darner, and Trice have to be the weakest
set of guards in the Big 10.   

For Indiana, Cheaney and Anderson did what they had to do.   Damon Bailey
had a bad, invisible game.   The Hoosiers played fantastic defense outside
the paint.   But there's some holes there that the foul trouble exposed.
Lyndon Jones just doesn't have it.   Nover and Lawson are forgettable.
Meeks is trying a little too hard to pretend he's Quinn Buckner.

A great game.   
15.19Could be very tough come MarchSHALOT::HUNTBippity Boppity BooTue Jan 15 1991 12:4810
    I saw the first 10 minutes of the game when Indiana built up the early
    10 point lead over Purdue.
    
    My initial thought was that Knight has the studs to make a run at the
    title *THIS* year.
    
    It is definitely to Keady's credit that the Boilermakers were able to
    come back enough to make it a tight game.
    
    Bob Hunt
15.20CARP::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 15 1991 14:0333
    Which Purdue players would start for IU?  Oliver at forward and any 
    one of Riley, Stanback, or McNary at center.  Definitely, without a
    shred of doubt, Nover and Lawson would end up 4th & 5th on the depth
    chart behind any of Keady's big men.  As for Oliver, he's stronger
    around the hoop than Cheaney, who ideally should be playing the big,
    or shooting, guard position.
    
    As I predicted in November, Bob was trying to develop either of his 
    stiff middlemen (Nover is actually a scrub foward thrust into the 
    role out of necessity) and when it came time to play for the games that
    count - i.e., Big10 clashes, where no money-grubbing post-season 
    redundancies exist, thankfully - he'd go with his best five players 
    and thus a 3-guard offense.  And so it was, with 6-0 Meeks, 6-1 Jones
    and 6-2 Bailey starting along with Cheaney and Anderson in hopes of 
    successfully running a transition game against a much bigger and
    stronger Purdue lineup.
    
    It didn't work, however, with the little guys unable to keep up on the
    boards or play defense along the baseline.  Often, even without switch
    offs, Purdue was posting up much bigger players for easy buckets.  This
    especially hurt Bailey of the alleged 39" vertical leap, who for that
    reason sat out most of the game.  Even then, with the bigger Pat Graham
    and Chris Reynolds in, the Hoosiers went nearly 9 minutes without a 
    field goal not cuz a poor shooting but cuz they were badly intimidated
    inside, either flubbing or flinching or taking facials by the much more
    athletic players like Chuckie White, Oliver, Stanback et al.  
    
    The Hoosiers, supposedly the third best team in the nation and one of
    the deepest, went 4 or 5 minutes without even getting off a decent shot
    cuz they were overmatched.
    
    Big10 Tom 
    
15.21CARP::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 15 1991 14:1847
    Last night's game showed the weaknesses and strengths of Indiana.
    
    This is not a top10 team.  But, on the bright side, except for poor
    rebounding are a great defensive team, especially when Bailey is on
    the bench in favor of either Meeks or Reynolds.  They D well, pass
    well, transition well, execute well, and with most lineups they use
    usually shoot fairly well.
    
    While the new wave of college hoops is transition, to play that the
    prototype team calls for a raft of positionless clones basically
    comprised of 6-5 to 6-7 jumping jacks who cain dribble and run.  This
    is so cuz you must be able to rebound in order to run.  IU's flaw is 
    that they cain' rebound enough to run enough to compensate for what 
    they give up to bigger teams in the walk-up game.  They need either a
    center or a couple of highly athletic positionless clones.
    
    The Hoosier squad is very unwieldy from a lineup/matchup standpoint,
    and when analyzed by position shows a startling lack of depth.  When
    graded by quality (e.g., a foward who cain survive against a B-forward
    like Chuckie White, who looked like Larry Johnson last night) this is
    apparent:
    
    			  DEPTH BY QUALITY RANK	
    
    Power forward:  1. Eric Anderson
    		    2. 
    		    3. 
    
    Small forward:  1. Calbert Cheaney
    		    2. Pat Graham 
    		    3. 
    
    Center:	    1.
    		    2.
    		    3.
    
    Point Guard:    1. Jamaal Meeks
    		    2. Chris Reynolds
    	  	    3. Damon Bailey
    		    4. Lyndon Jones
                    
    Nover, Lawson, Gregg Graham, and Pat Knight are not good enough right 
    now to survive against big-fast-talented players at their respective 
    postions.  (Remember, this has to do with a #3 team that supposedly has
    a legitimate shot at the Title.) 
    
    Big10 Tom
15.22Purdue talent summed up nicely: P-U!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 15 1991 14:209
    Yup Doug, everybody should start singing the praises of Mean Gene cause
    he can't do the absolute most important thing a coach has to do:
    
    RECRUIT.
    
    What a guy!  What a coach!!  What a team!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.23SACT41::ROSSDick Clark's Rockin' Iraq EveTue Jan 15 1991 14:2022
>    Which Purdue players would start for IU?  Oliver at forward and any 
>    one of Riley, Stanback, or McNary at center. 

Made my day, MrT.   That has to be the funniest thing you've ever written.
Riley is the worst center Purdue has had in ten years.  Stanback looked
good, but is a frosh with no range and a 45% shooter at the line.  McNary
is a raw talent.    But no way ANY of them would start for Bob... no way.
Oliver would only start if you move Cheaney to guard, even though Cheaney
is taller and a better rebounder... He's a legit small forward.

>    It didn't work, however, with the little guys unable to keep up on the
>    boards or play defense along the baseline.  Often, even without switch
 
All that kept Purdue in the game was the foul trouble on Anderson and Cheaney
and also the fact that Anderson did not assert himself on offense until crunch
time.     

You heard Vitale.  Judd Heathcoate said that Keady gets more out of his
"talent" than any coach in the country.    And his 10-11 record against
Knight is amazing.


15.24AnalysisCARP::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 15 1991 14:3255
    ANALYSIS
    
    ThunderBurp's departure left a gaping hole that has not been covered.
    Bailey's outside shooting and jumping ability is a big disappointment.
    Pat Graham washed out as a big shooting guard but has carved out a 
    nice niche for himself as a good backup small forward who drives and
    shoots well but gives up something on D.  Nover is hopeless, he has no
    basketball instincts and is always out of position for rebounds.  The
    squad needs to develop more outside shooting from someone.  Because of
    the depth problems playing Eric Anderson in the middle won't work cuz
    he'll end up in foul trouble every time against big, strong, deep front
    lines like Purdue's.
    
    RECOMMENDATION:
    
    Play Lawson and let him develop.  He saved IU's ass last night, bringing
    in some D and some O and a few boards in the middle, and letting Eric
    either sit or play his natural postion.  Also, when Henderson comes in 
    next year this will allow Cheaney to move to shooting guard and give the
    Hoosiers a clear shot at Title No. 6.
    
    Scrap Bailey for Reynolds at the, who is much quicker, a much better 
    defender, plays much bigger (leaping and arm length), drives better, and 
    shoots at least as well from the outside.  Play Meeks at point, where he
    makes few mistakes, passes as well as Bailey overall, and plays much 
    better D.
    
    Rotate in as first subs Pat Graham at small forward, Nover at big forward
    or center, Bailey at point, and Jones at shooting guard.
    
    Experiment and maybe develop Pat Graham at small forward with Cheaney
    at big guard.  If that worked and Lawson maintained serviceability IU 
    could then be scary.
    
    Big10 Tom's starting lineup:
    
    	F - Anderson
    	F - Cheaney
    	C - Lawson
        G - Reynolds
    	G - Meeks
    
    I think we may see this lineup eventually.
    
    Also, congrat's to the Pudue alumni for a superb job at poor mouthing
    this year.  They have more muscle along the stripe that any team in the
    Big10 and Keady knows it.  When I first saw Riley I said, "surely he's
    a stiff who cain't shoot the rock."  Surprise, Riley drilled a number of
    consecutive baskets to keep Purdue in the game down the stretch. 
    
    Shame on Keady for failing to exploit Oliver's great talent last night
    (only 11 pts.); and shame on the referees for dishing out some of the
    coldest home cooking seen in the Big10 in years.
    
    Big10 Tom	
15.25SACT41::ROSSDick Clark's Rockin' Iraq EveTue Jan 15 1991 14:3426
>    Yup Doug, everybody should start singing the praises of Mean Gene cause
>    he can't do the absolute most important thing a coach has to do:
>    
>    RECRUIT.

Huh?   I know you know that he's already bagged one of the top five in the
country, Glenn Robinson.    McNary, Stanback, and {to a lesser degree, Trice}
all look like good players.    

If you consider the bagging of big name players who then sit on the bench 
as a positive, then you're right, Keady can't recruit.   

If you consider taking lesser blue chip players and molding them into great
teams a negative, then you're right, Keady can't recruit.

If you consider setting academic standards higher than those of the NCAA
and Big 10 and then trying to find players who fit that mold as a negative,
then you're right, Keady can't recruit.

If you call recruiting within spitting distance of Bob Knight and Notre Dame
and not always getting the best players in the state as a negative, then
you're right, Keady can't recruit.

Coming from a supporter of a coach whose had Michael Jordan, Brad Daugherty,
Sam Perkins, James Worthy, Phil Ford, et al pass thru with only a single 
title to his credit, I'd wonder why you'd consider recruiting a big deal.
15.261-15-91FORTSC::MOKTue Jan 15 1991 14:5996
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-15-91)  NCAA
Date: 15 Jan 91 05:44:17 GMT
 
I'm doing this very early, with rum in hand, since I have to dodge
snowflakes to repair raingages in Chicago tomorrow (today).  Tell me,
when is Purdue going to get a clue in the final few minutes of a game?
It doesn't get any easier for them in Gopher Country Thursday.  Well,
the rum is good, anyway...
 
 
Tonight's Result:
 
#6  Indiana 65, #33 PURDUE 62:  Purdue got alot of help from the
	"Sixth Man", but they didn't help themselves much in the final five
	minutes again as poised IU won it's 13th straight game.  IU started
	out the game on fire, nailing three treys and leading 16-4 before
	Purdue knew what hit them (they looked really tight).  The Boilers
	cut the lead to 22-13 before IU went up 26-16.  Purdue then got the
	Hoosiers into serious foul trouble, particularly Calbert Cheaney and
	Eric Anderson, and went to the locker room down only 6, 37-31.
	Purdue then scored 9 of the first 13 second half points and drew to
	41-40.  It was within this period that both Cheaney and Anderson
	drew their fourth fouls.  IU subs quickly regained a 6-point, 46-40
	lead, but Chuckie White went spastic and Purdue took it's first lead
	at 49-48 around the 10 minute mark.  Purdue held this lead for many
	minutes, with leads of up to four points at 52-48 and lastly at
	58-54.  Amazingly, both Anderson and Cheaney came back into the game
	together, and neither drew another foul in leading IU back to
	victory.  The two scored nearly all of IU's points the rest of the
	way, Anderson hitting a bunch of tough J's.  IU scored seven
	straight to lead 61-58, partially fueled by some awful Purdue shot
	selection and the typically ridiculous Dave Barrett telegraph
	pass/turnovers.  Purdue drew back to 61-60, but IU hit a shot to go
	up 63-60 and then Pat Graham nailed two FTs to make the lead 65-60.
	Matt Painter then hit a duece to make it 65-62 under the :10 mark,
	and then we were entertained by several timeouts and aborted inbound
	attempts.   Jamaal Meeks was fouled with 6+ ticks left, and he
	responded under pressure with two absolute bricks.  But, Jimmy
	Oliver, who had a terrible game under extreme pressure (Bob Knight
	is no dummy), rebounded and passed off to a freshman, Travis Trice,
	with a confused look on his face, instead of going for it himself.
	Trice promptly forgot how to dribble once he crossed the time line
	and IU won without Purdue even taking a shot.  Chuckie White, who
	scored 17 and pulled down 10 boards, took an ill-advised shot in the
	final two minutes, as did bricklayer Painter.  Ian Stanback was
	tremenous on the boards, and Purdue seemed to lose some zip when he
	left the game late for several minutes after being elbowed by Craig
	Riley.  Even though Anderson and Cheaney picked up a few pine
	splinters, they led the Hoosiers in scoring with 15 and 14,
	respectively, in a hard-earned win.  Another sellout of 14,123 saw
	Purdue lose for the third time this year by 3 or less after leading
	late, twice already in this young Big Ten season.  This was the
	first game that new IU-East student Woody Austin was missed...
 
 
Thursday:
 
	#24  Michigan State at #67 ILLINOIS       7:00 pm
	#42  Iowa at #68 WISCONSIN                7:00 pm
	#241 Northwestern at #69 MICHIGAN         7:00 pm
	#33  Purdue at #64 MINNESOTA              7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#64  Minnesota at #24 MICHIGAN STATE      Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#69  Michigan at #68 WISCONSIN            2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#67  Illinois at # 5 OHIO STATE           7:00 pm
	# 6  Indiana at #42 IOWA                  7:00 pm
 
Next Monday:
 
	# 5  Ohio State at #6 INDIANA             8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    5      4    Ohio State        14-0     4-0
    6      3    Indiana           15-1     3-0
   24     26    Michigan State    10-4     3-1
   67     36    Illinois          12-4     2-1
   42     24    Iowa              13-3     2-2
   33     40    Purdue            10-4     2-2
   64     44    Minnesota          8-5     1-2
   68     NR    Wisconsin          7-6     1-2
   69     NR    Michigan           7-7     0-4
  241     NR    Northwestern       5-8     0-4
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler                        peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu |
| Illinois State Water Survey      or: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu        |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15.27but could she stop a runaway train in its tracks?CARP::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 15 1991 15:0139
    
    First off: The most important, overriding fack that I, as a_alum of
    Indiana, would like to focus, even dwell, on, is:
    
    
    			Mrs. Keady
    
    
    That's right, Mrs. Gene Keady.  'Nuff said, don't you think?  Whoa.
    Runaway truck, shovel, house fire maybe?  It's a mystery to me, but
    all I cain say is: Mrs. Keady.  Haw haa hee gnhee (tm) !!
    
    Mrs. Gene Keady.  Mrs. Keady Mrs. Keady Mrs. Keady Mrs. Keady Mrs.
    Keady.  Ha ha haaa.  Mrs. *Keady*.  Ho ho ho.
    
    'Nuff said.  Mrs. Keady.
    
    *****
    
    Say what you want, Dougie, but the fack remains that any one of those
    three players would be starting in the middle for the Hoosiers in a 
    minute.  You cain just as easily say that no way ever would a Nover or
    a Lawson be starting for Knight but they have.
    
    You axed the question and I gave a_answer that stands up to reality:
    No way could Bob keep Oliver off the floor (move him to guard, he's
    MUCH more talented than any of the 3 who started last night); and Riley
    looked pretty decent to me.  He put a nifty move on Anderson moving to
    the hoop for a layup, and he popped a few nice little Js, but most of 
    all he - along with White and Stanback and McNary - intimidated the
    smaller Hoosiers out of several easy shots.  
    
    Keady's doing a fine job with a spotty, young team; but so is Bob.
    Mene Gene has 4 bucks he cain throw at you up front, IU has 2.  On the
    other hand Bob has 6 guards, Mene Gene only 1 or 2.  If they played ten
    games Purdue would win at least 3 or 4 of them cuz Keady (ever the
    whiner) has some things that the alleged #3 Hoosiers clearly lack.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.28SACT41::ROSSDick Clark's Rockin' Iraq EveTue Jan 15 1991 16:003
Is Mrs. Gene Keady that black haired, leather-skinned, social x-ray we
saw on camera for what seemed like minutes in the second half?   If so,
then all I can say is that Gene better hope the kids look like him.
15.29CARP::SHAUGHNESSYAD 1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989Tue Jan 15 1991 16:3122
    Oh come ON Doug don't pretend that you don't know now !!
    
    Yes yes YES that black haired, leather-skinned, social x-ray in
    the Holiday Inn Lounge Lizard slatternly get-up that we were forced 
    view repeatedly is Gene's wife, and now you know why he's so doggoned
    Mene.
    
    ESPN must have some fun dudes on their crews, cuz whenever Purdue
    plays the remarkable Mrs. Keady gets major camera time haw haw haw haa.
    
    Btw, you should send Dickie a thank-u note for failing to comment on
    the wildly biased officiating last nite.
    
    And, as for your poor mouthing, just let me say that Riley had the body
    that I had envisioned when I first read that IU had signed a peckerwood
    center two eyars ago.  He's very strong, and coordinated.  Ditto for 
    McNary who also has some other tools.  Stanback could be a star as early
    as next year.  But apparently you consider Lawson and Nover as being at
    some level of preparation other than "raw" haw haw haw.
    
                                                           
    Big10 Tom 
15.30QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Jan 15 1991 17:024
Is it true that T and Ross surreptitiously purloined Lou Holtz' book and
have taken several pages from it?

Mike JN
15.31SACT41::ROSSDick Clark's Rockin' Iraq EveTue Jan 15 1991 17:5852
>    Oh come ON Doug don't pretend that you don't know now !!

I honestly didn't.   I may have seen her on a tv game before, but it never
registered that she was that nasty looking.   I hope Gene is getting a little
action on the side from the Girl in Black or the Silver Twins....

>    ESPN must have some fun dudes on their crews, cuz whenever Purdue
>    plays the remarkable Mrs. Keady gets major camera time haw haw haw haa.

And Dickie Vitale is always commenting on how great she is... Must be looking
out of his blind eye...
    
>    Btw, you should send Dickie a thank-u note for failing to comment on
>    the wildly biased officiating last nite.
 
You mean the ones that kept Anderson and Cheaney in the game with four 
fouls each for the final 13 minutes?  The refs were typical Big 10 - bad
both ways... and it hurts the Big 10 later because they let SO much stuff
go... that come tournament time, the boys can't adjust.   {Watch and see
if the Big East's expirement with 6 fouls this year hurts later on}.

>    And, as for your poor mouthing, just let me say that Riley had the body
>    that I had envisioned when I first read that IU had signed a peckerwood
>    center two eyars ago.  He's very strong, and coordinated.

You've gotta be kidding!  Riley is a stiff... a plodding, oafish, stiff.
He makes Stephen Scheffler look like David Robinson.   Riley averages 
3.5 points a game and had a career high 10 yesterday {4 of them when
guarded by Anderson with four fouls} and you're talking like he's the
next Kent Benson.   I don't remember him grabbing more than a couple
boards.   Plus he's a senior!   A fifth year, I think!  And now he's 
"developing"?????  He's a stiff.

And as for poor mouthing, it's because this year's team is lousy.  
Two years ago when Troy Lewis, Everette Stephens, and Todd Mitchell were
in there, nobody was saying "they bite".   And I have high expectations
for next year and even higher for the year after.  1992-93 should be 
another Big 10 championship year for Keady... especially if he can find
a guard who can knock down the jumper.

>Lawson and Nover as being at some level of preparation other than "raw"

I would say Lawson and Riley are about equal - Indiana cornfed farmboys
who'll probably be driving Paw's John Deere in about 4 months.   Nover is
nothing but raw.   Yes, they needed a Funderburke to be a sure-thing Final
Four team.  But they play well enough to be a possible Final Four team.

The point you miss is that IU has 2 of the top five players in the Big 10,
a very steady set of guards, great team defense, and Bob Knight.   Purdue
has Jimmy Oliver {a second-tier Big 10 star},  a couple raw freshmen, and 
Gene Keady.   They'll win 50% in the Big 10 on guts alone... and that just
might get them in the tournament.... 
15.32MAXWEL::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Tue Jan 15 1991 19:007
Doug, Big East also had the 6 foul rule last year and didn't seem to hurt
them in the tournment.  I don't recall anyone fouling out in the tournment
or coaches having to drastically change their rotations to protect players.


mike
15.33Purdue loses to IU at home haw haw hawCARP::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewTue Jan 15 1991 19:034
    Balderdash, Ross.  You've cut loose a all Reality.  And you're not a 
    gracious Loser I might add.
    
    Big10 Tom  
15.34Bob, You Make My Heart ThrobITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYAD1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989Wed Jan 16 1991 20:0215
    Bob Knight just HAS to be a shoo-in for Big10 CoTY right now!  
    
    Think a it: Bob has no center, no shooting guard, poor depth, no
    front-line widebody muscle-'bounds, a very very young team hurt by
    a highly-touted recruit who's washing out... and yet he's, what?, 
    13-1 and 3-1 and #3.
      
    True, the Hoosiers will slide once they hit the road against the
    tougher squads, and will probably slide as low as the high teens,
    but, hey, they've got a shot at 2nd in the conference and will
    surely make the tournament.
    
    Is it too early for kudos here?  No, I think not: Kudos Bob! 
    
    Big10 Tom
15.35Gettin' way to deep for me...AXIS::ROBICHAUDJust this beer, then one more...Wed Jan 16 1991 20:261
    
15.36yawnEARRTH::BROOKSPsssst .... Elvis is dead.Thu Jan 17 1991 03:141
    
15.37:^)CHIEFF::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Thu Jan 17 1991 12:166
	
 Let him beat Randy Ayers' teams first then we can talk....

 mike    

15.38QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Thu Jan 17 1991 15:369
I  don't know, T....

I've only seen Indy twice this year, but whether it's chemistry and
coaching, or talent.... they look like they could be a contendah!

Things are just starting, and I'm lookin forward to NCAA Tournament
already!

Mike JN
15.39ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYIf war, who'll man the 7-11s?Thu Jan 17 1991 17:5716
    I must be losing my mind.  I coulda swore that poor Bob started
    three guards, a swingman, and a shooting forward at center the
    other night!  And I musta hallucinated about the supposedly #3
    Hoosiers being dominated on the boards by 15 and having several
    insides shots either blocked or given up on.
    
    Reality check: The present IU squad will fold like a cheap tent
    against the likes of Arkansas or several other teams ranked 
    below them right now.  This is as good as it gets at #3, from
    here on it's all downhill.
    
    This is a very talented but one-dimensional fatally flawed IU team
    that'll end up losing several games and bowing out in the 2nd round
    of the NCAA tourney.
    
    MrObjectivityInSportsAnalysis
15.40Ross is the Boss! (in this note, anyway)HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe elbow is part of the ballFri Jan 18 1991 14:264
    I get a feeling that MrT will poor-mouth IU's talent until the day
    Knight starts 5 NBA All Stars.
    
    Dan
15.41MAXWEL::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Fri Jan 18 1991 15:057
 How about them Badgers? Anyone give us a rundown on them? Blew Iowa
 away at home last night. Didn't see as much as would have like because
 of the war. Do we have a little guy here ready to knock heads with the
 big guys of Big ten/eleven/fifteen?

 mike
15.42SACT41::ROSSDeadly, when I play a dope melodyMon Jan 21 1991 13:0919
Big game tonight...

	#3 Ohio State versus #4 Indiana at Bloomington, IN... ESPN... 9:30

	Indiana blew out Iowa at Iowa Saturday... it was close for awhile.


Indiana must win.   The Big 10 title usually involves winning all {maybe one
loss} at home and beating all the bad teams on the road and splitting with
the good ones {Ohio State, Michigan State, Minnesota, Illinois}.   The
matchup I'm looking forward to is Jimmy Jackson vs Calbert Cheaney.  Two of
the three best players in the league {both soph's}.    Knight needs to find
someone to keep Perry Carter off the boards... hopefully, Anderson will show
some guts tonight.

Purdue lost again Saturday.   They've lost by one at Illinois, by three to
Indiana, and by a couple at Minnesota.  Losing the close ones points directly
to their guards - the weakest bunch in the Big 10.  Is it still poormouthing to
call a 2-3 team lousy?  
15.43OSU's guards quickness maybe the difference...MAXWEL::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Mon Jan 21 1991 13:5112
 And Ohio State blew out Illinois 89-55 on saturday so both teams are ready.
 Actually Doug, I'd look for Lawson to pull a surprise here and play well
 enough to off-set Carter. He lacks consistency but has played big in a couple
 of big games he's been involved in and will have a slight height advantage..

 first game of the night is SU/Georgetown so it has all the makings of one
 of the best Big Mondays in a long time. 7:30 est.

 and for the nighthawks and west coaster UNLV/UCSB at midnight...

 mike
15.44SACT41::ROSSDeadly, when I play a dope melodyMon Jan 21 1991 14:1016
> first game of the night is SU/Georgetown so it has all the makings of one
> of the best Big Mondays in a long time. 7:30 est.
> and for the nighthawks and west coaster UNLV/UCSB at midnight...

Wow!   We'll see #1, #3, #4 and whatever Syracuse is... and enough guys
to fill out two All-America teams:
	
	Larry Johnson           Stacy Augmon
	Billy Owens             ???? Anderson {drew a blank!}
	Dikembe Mutoumbo        Alonzo Mourning
	Calbert Cheaney         Anderson Hunt
	Jimmy Jackson           Damon Bailey {;-)}

Stompshin, BayWhine, BoobKnight,The Shirk!

This is why God created ESPN!
15.45blank fill: Eric...agreed on espnMAXWEL::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Mon Jan 21 1991 14:230
15.46ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Jan 21 1991 15:333
    
    OSU by 6... bank on it!
    
15.47MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Jan 21 1991 15:3323
    This is the best Big Monday I cain remember.  And on ESPN so no rude
    interruptions by self-seeking war reporters anxious to explain what 
    they haven't seen, don't know, aren't sure of, or have already told you
    several hundred times! 
    
    >Indiana must win.
    
    Absolutely correct.  Only in the Big10, the dinosaur league that yet
    allows its fans a meaningful championship season fraught with early
    season tension, is this adrenaline-pumping pleasure possible.
    
    I'm buzzed already.  If Indiana gags tonight it's a dog fight for 2nd
    place baby!  Michigan State has regained its form, with Peplowski on
    a roll now, they mainhandled Minnesota until the very end, and then 
    held them off with superior beef.  
    
    >is it still poormouthing...
    
    Oh why don't you CAN IT buddy.  Minnesota's relatively dangerous.  And
    perhaps it's time for us to review Mene Gene's coaching.  Btw, Bob is
    winning his haid-to-haid with him.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.48Big Monday ends after IU beats OSU.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Jan 21 1991 15:3620
    Yea, I've been thinking about tonights "Big Monday" (not to mention
    clearly my schedule from 7:30pm until ???) and it really makes me
    appreciate the NCAA Tournament.
    
    Ya see, we've got four (4) teams in the top 10 (approx) unabashedly
    going at each other, mano-a-mano.  Two will win; two will lose.  Then
    they'll pick up and go at some other Top 20 team next game.
    
    Meanwhile UNLV, who everyone knows could beat the Nuggets on a bad
    night (*their* bad night, not Westhaid's bunch) playing (gasp) *Santa
    Barbara*.  YAWN.
    
    It's unfortunate that such a talented bunch can only battle the best a
    handful of times each year, and what's more, me_thinks their woeful
    schedule will cost them a Title.  They lucked out last year against
    Ball State, but, IMHO, will get knocked off by somebody this year,
    probably before the Final 4.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.49WisconsinMUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Jan 21 1991 15:4329
    >How about them Badgers.
    
    Excellent question.  I've been meaning to write on them but what with
    the race war in the Gulf I'VE BEEN BUSY.
    
    I'd liken the Badgers to Kaintuck.  Against the Hawkeyes they shot an
    eye-popping 11-for-17 from The Land Of Trey.  Anybody who saw the CBS
    game Saturday against Michigan should take care to not be mislead:
    Yoder purposefully held back on the 3-pointers in order to exploit the
    Wolve's woeful lack of inside strength.  
    
    Ellenson, Douglass, Hisle, and especially Locum cain flat put it down
    from afar.  They also are fairly quick, and usually will run run run 
    what with their "big" guys being 6-6 jumping jack Willie Simms (their
    best player) and 6-6 Patrick Tompskins (the ultimate nuclear widebody,
    his bod makes Perry Carter and The Round Mound Of Rebound look like 
    hair stylists clipping locks at Chez Bruce, beauty salon for men).
    
    But Yoder may have sealed his fate losing at home like he did Saturday.
    What made it worse was how ultra-stupe Fisher did it: with 3 seconds
    left and Wisconsin in the backcourt a guard raced over and fouled the
    Badger's best free throw shooter, Hisle (1), and Fisher went to ice 
    him with a TO but in a frenzy of bench disorganization reminiscent of 
    Jim BayWhine failed to call it in time.
    
    Wisconsin still has a shot at the Big10's fourth spot in the tourney.
    The word in Mad City is that Yoder either cops it or he's done. 
    
    Big10 Tom                                                      
15.50MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Jan 21 1991 15:4923
    I might say that I'm quite pleased that Bob took my advice to 
    heart and made the lineup changes I detailed for him last week.
    
    Bob has apparently made the decision to dump the hapless Matt 
    Nover and stick with the short-armed-but-6-10 redhaid Chris Lawson
    in the paint.  That's good.  Also, he's given a central role to
    his best overall guard Chris Reynolds, who's a_awesome defender
    and cain drive to the hoops so sweet, teaming him up with Jamaal
    Meeks and diminishing the PT of the horridly overhyped Damon.
    
    Now, if he'd just insist that Calbert haid fake more on his outside
    J from the standstill and drive to the hoop like only he cain, this
    squad could be ship-shape.
    
    I wouldn't be surprised if Bob puts Eric Anderon on Jim Jackson.
    
    Re: Big Monday
    
    The nicest thing about Big Monday is that it's the only day of the
    week we're not facing several ACC games on the tube.  Also, UCSB is
    thought to be UNLV's toughest conference game.
                                                  
    Big10 Tom
15.51CAM::WAYBo don't know which one's VanilliMon Jan 21 1991 15:539
15.52MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Jan 21 1991 16:0215
    
    >do you have a hotline to the Great One,
    
    I send him a Federal Express package containing my thoughts after
    each game witnessed by me.  Xs & Os type stuff too complicated to
    go into here.  
    
    We used to speak on the phone quite a lot, but that hasn't happened
    since after the University of Richmond game...
    
    He *did* send me a letter this fall after the big Thanksgiving Feast
    final victory on the Bob vs. Dean debate congratulating me and saying
    how proud of me he was, however.
    
    Big10 Tom                       
15.53CAM::WAYGo get yourself some cheap sunglassesMon Jan 21 1991 16:1017
>    I send him a Federal Express package containing my thoughts after
>    each game witnessed by me.  Xs & Os type stuff too complicated to
>    go into here.  

I'm impressed.  Good choice, Federal Express.  I saw a lot on the
games this weekend that Fed Ex is out to make you have a nice day.
I'll bet Bob appreciates that personal touch.
    
>    He *did* send me a letter this fall after the big Thanksgiving Feast
>    final victory on the Bob vs. Dean debate congratulating me and saying
>    how proud of me he was, however.

Which I'm sure is displayed prominantly in your home...

Congrats!
'Saw

15.54BSS::JCOTANCHBills 51, 'Just Win, Baby' 3Mon Jan 21 1991 16:1310
>    Also, UCSB is
>    thought to be UNLV's toughest conference game.
  
    I think most would consider UNLV's toughest conference game to be at New
    Mexico State.  They are currently ranked 21st.
    
    Joe                                              
    
    
 
15.55Murphy BrownMAXWEL::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Mon Jan 21 1991 16:3212
 UNLV has a non-conference game with Arkansas left on their schedule. This
 will be a tough game no matter what even tougher if it's at Arkansas.
 Agreed T, I've been touting Lawson since I saw him in the Maui Classic.
 I also remember the monster he had last year agianst Lou-do's jumping
 jacks.

 mike_who'll_be_in_the_cellar_tonight_while_the_wife_watches_the_classic_bitch

    
 

15.561-18-91FORTSC::MOKMon Jan 21 1991 21:39117
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-18-91)  NCAA
Date: 18 Jan 91 19:19:44 GMT
 
This league is indeed shaping up as the Big 3 and the Little 7, as
Michigan State joined the other two big boys (IU and OSU) at the top of
the conference, and really, should do nothing but get better.  The
Little 7 can probably be divided into Illinois/Purdue/Minnesota/Iowa,
plus maybe Wisconsin or Michigan, and then Northwestern at the end...
 
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#43 Michigan State 71, #62 ILLINOIS 68:  The tables turned on
	Illinois as it was the team which blew a big lead and lost near the
	end.  The Illini had a great first half, running off to a 37-27 lead
	at the break.  The lead balooned to 14 early in the second half
	(41-27) after two Deon Thomas shots, but then the Spartans started
	chipping away as Steve Smith did his damage (he scored 35 points).
	It was just 52-50 Illinois at the 11:54 mark.  The Illini got a
	three point play from Rennie Clemons, then went over 8 minutes
	before scoring another field goal.  By that time, State was up by
	four.  Illinois pulled within two with 1:21 left, and with :33 left,
	Steve Smith was called for traveling with MSU up 67-64.  Andy Kpedi
	nailed two free throws with :15.4 left, but Matt Steigenga answered
	with two of his own with :13.4 left for a 69-66 lead.  Clemons made
	a layup with 7 seconds left, but Smith finished the scoring with two
	free throws at the 6 second mark.  The Illini did not get much of a
	shot off at the end.  Mark Montgomery had 12 for MSU, while Clemons
	led Illinois with 17 and Andy Kaufmann had 16.  11,504 showed at the
	Hall...
 
#67 WISCONSIN 91, #49 Iowa 79:  Blowout City!!!  Wisconsin exploded
	to a 42-27 halftime edge on some great shooting, much from 6'7" John
	Ellenson (he was 4-5 from trifecta land in the first half).  Iowa
	put on a second half rally which got them as close as 80-68 with
	4:32 left (and the final score, of course), but Wisconsin then went
	on an 11-2 run to salt the game away finally (91-70).  This was
	Iowa's 14th straight Big Ten road loss.  Tim Locum whistled the nets
	for 25 points, including 5 for 6 treys.  Ellenson had 21, Willie
	Simms 15, and Patrick Tompkins and Larry Hisle each had 12.  Iowa
	was led by Val Barnes' 19 and Acie Earl's 12.  Wisconsin shot 34-57
	from the field.  10,362 approved of the proceedings...
 
#57 MICHIGAN 79, #234 Northwestern 68:  Michigan struggled for a
	while but then pulled away to beat the Cats.  NU led 33-32 at the
	break after Michigan had led 14-8.  The Wildcats led by as much as
	27-22.  But, Michigan ripped out early in the second half (Steve
	Fisher must have given a rousing halftime speech), and before you
	knew it the Wolverines were up 47-35 with 14:22 left.  Northwestern
	made various runs thereafter, but Michigan was never really in
	danger of losing.  They whipped the Cats on the boards 34-18.
	Demetrius Calip had 22 points, Kirk Taylor 21 and Eric Riley 13 for
	Michigan.  Don Brotz had 19 for Bill Foster and Todd Leslie 18.
	10,548 were on hand in Ann Arbor...
 
#55 MINNESOTA 59, #32 Purdue 56:  Purdue once again came up a day
	late and a dollar short, this time at Minneapolis.  But they are in
	every game until the end.  That's good enough, isn't it???  Last
	night, the Boilers held a 47-45 lead with just 2:51 remaining.
	That's when 35% shooter Arriel McDonald took over, hitting
	the tying shot, the go-ahead shot, another shot and all of his
	freebies.  In fact, the Gophers hit 14 of 15 second half charity
	tosses, not bad for a team which shoots just 68% from the line.
	Even the Gopher fans will agree that this was one of the most poorly
	played Big Ten contests they've seen in a long time.  The halftime
	score was 20-20, as both Kevin Lynch and Jimmy Oliver, the two "Top
	Guns" of their respective teams, shot airballs and generally looked
	awful.  Minnesota once led by 7 in the first half (17-10) in just a
	pathetic display of basketball.  Purdue scored the final four points
	of the first half to forge the tie, then hit the first five of the
	second half and you got the feeling that someone was finally taking
	charge.  But, the Gophers quickly closed to 27-26, and the lead then
	changed hands most of the way until McDonald's flurry.  The Gophers
	went ahead 53-48 before Purdue closed to 55-53 on an Oliver
	trey.  The Gophers then went up 59-53, on free throws, when Jimmy
	Oliver banked in a 35-foot prayer at the horn (why didn't he do that
	Monday night?).  McDonald scored 10 of his 12 points in the final
	2:01.  Lynch ended up 2-13 from the floor, and Oliver was 5-16, as
	both teams shot well below 50%.  Purdue was an incredible 5 for 23
	from three-point land.  Not running much offense lately, Gene...
	Craig Riley was the only bright spot, scoring 19 on 7-10 shooting
	and 5-5 from the stripe, if you can believe that.  Purdue's guards
	were a combined 3 for 16 from the field and scored only 9 points.
	Keady got the obligatory T, but Minnesota only got one point out of
	it.  15,058 fans were happy, but relieved to go home after this one...
 
 
Saturday:
 
	#55  Minnesota at #43 MICHIGAN STATE      Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#57  Michigan at #67 WISCONSIN            2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#62  Illinois at # 3 OHIO STATE           7:00 pm
	# 5  Indiana at #49 IOWA                  7:00 pm
	#234 Northwestern at NORTHEASTERN
 
Monday:
 
	# 3  Ohio State at #5 INDIANA             8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    3      4    Ohio State        14-0     4-0
    5      3    Indiana           15-1     3-0
   43     26    Michigan State    11-4     4-1
   62     36    Illinois          12-5     2-2
   55     44    Minnesota          9-5     2-2
   67     NR    Wisconsin          8-6     2-2
   49     24    Iowa              13-4     2-3
   32     40    Purdue            10-5     2-3
   57     NR    Michigan           8-7     1-4
  234     NR    Northwestern       5-9     0-5
15.57SACT41::ROSSWar, ugh, what is it good for?Tue Jan 22 1991 11:159
Ohio State beat Indiana last night 93-85.    The Buckeyes pulled out to a 
18 point halftime lead as the Hoosiers couldn't hit anything from the outside.
Calbert Cheaney was particularly woeful early on.  In the second half, a team
of Cheaney, Greg Graham, Damon Bailey, Jamaal Meeks and Eric Anderson brought
the Hoosiers all the way back to close to 3 points.   In the end, they couldn't
stop Ohio State that ONE TIME they needed to.

You know, Kenny Anderson may put the fans in the seats, but I think Jimmy
Jackson will win you more ballgames in the NBA.    He was impressive.
15.58ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Jan 22 1991 13:314
    
    RE: .46
    
    So I was off by two... I knew the Bucks would come through. 
15.59it's State vs. State for Big10 Crown nowITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 22 1991 14:1146
    That Bob had to give up on his stiff middlemen and go back to the
    3-guard lineup is unsurprising.  I think IU will want to get Lawson
    PT wherever possible, but he was clearly in way over his red haid
    last night with the nuclear widebody combo of Treg Lee and Perry 
    Carter, one time nearly missing the backboard entirely on a_attempted
    bank shot that was nearly blocked.
    
    IU is better in a 3-guard lineup cuz Lawson/Nover don't rebound anyway,
    and carry a heavy cost in muffed pass receptions, stupid fouls, and
    abject inability to participate in the running game.
    
    While I was sad to see the badly overrated Hoosiers' obvious flaws so
    brutally exposed, you have to credit Ohio State.  Jim Jackson is a
    first team All-America in my book.  And as a Big10 fan it's remarkable
    and pleasing to see how polished Carter and Lee are now, these guys 
    looked like hopeless stiffs a couple of years back, and that's great
    coaching.  
    
    A wagering friend of mine loaded up heavily on the Bucks last night,
    the book on IU was that they exhibited all the tell-tale signs of a
    badly overrated team: 1) many comeback victories against tougher comp,
    2) consistently outrebounded, 3) one dimensional (poor outside shooting),
    4) caught tougher opponents at right time (Louisville, Notre Dame, U. of
    Kaintuck, 5) unstable starting lineup and PT distribution... 
    
    Seeing some of the mismatches last night (Damon Bailey at forward vying
    with Treg Lee and Perry Carter on the boards, for instance) pretty much
    lays out the fact that the Hoosiers are naked against the quality teams
    and will not compete for the Big10 Title.  
    
    I'm sticking with my prediction that the Hoosiers will finish 3rd in the
    Big10 (behind Michigan State) and end up somewhere in the low teens in
    the polls.
    
    They're a small team unable to play the running game cuz they lack 
    widebodies, with the very unusual negative dimension that they are 
    susceptible to zones cuz they're poor outside shooters and to foul woes
    cuz they have no depth on the front-line.
    
    What we saw last night was the reality of Funderburke's departure and 
    the fack that Damon Bailey doesn't have the physical presence to ever 
    be a dominating player.  This is a team with a truckload of point 
    guards and two very very sweet fowards unable to operate optimally cuz
    of the lack of at least two more quality front-line talents.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.60Fun gameSHALOT::HUNTSo much for the Peace Dividend ...Tue Jan 22 1991 15:5122
 That was a great game.  The Buckeyes are truly loaded and they've got
 Final Four written all over them.
 
 Indiana is not as bad off as you make them out to be.   They could have
 used a little better free throw shooting last night, for instance.  They
 must have missed at least 10 charity stripers.
 
 Calbert Cheaney is the real thing and Damon Bailey, I think, will surprise
 you when he's all done in Camp Bob.   He does have an awareness of the
 court despite whatever physical limitations he might have.   That will pay
 off in the right spot at the right time someday in the future.
 
 I also noticed that a chair violently stood there against The General's
 foot.   Nice to know he hasn't mellowed out too much.
 
 Also, this was *EXACTLY* the kind of game (9:30pm tube start on a school
 night) that he was bitching and moaning about a few years ago.  Has he
 changed that tune, too, or was he told to just shut up and play them ???
 
 Vitale is a moron.   He needs a Quaalude or ten.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.61good game. Pat Grahman gunshy againMAXWEL::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Tue Jan 22 1991 16:0013
 Bob, he'd need atleast the 10....He's the worst part of the package
 perhaps someday ESPN will realize it. Tough guy for them to give up though
 cause he's friends with all the coaches and gets the tough interviewees
 for them even if his questions are creampuff...

 Yup great game last night. I agree with Bob on Damon and T on Lee and
 Carter. I wanted to give Jackson POY of the Big ten last year for pete
 sakes and he's only gotten better has Brown and everyone else.

 Ayers' star is rising fast. OSU better make him a quality offer soon...

 mike 
15.62Ugly night in the Knorr & MrT homes!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 22 1991 17:2117
    There I was gettin' ready for game time last night when the wife
    unloads my 5-day old on me.  "No problem - get some sleep." I tell her,
    knowing that any son of mine is gonna love this kind of action!
    
    Well he was fine at first, but it seemed the more the Buckeyes poured
    it on in the first half, the worse he got.  By halftime I was left
    holding a screaming ball of flesh.  Slobber was dripping down his face;
    he stunk like high heaven; he was wailing like a Tel Aviv missile-alert
    siren.
    
    And then it hit me.  My son was undoubtedly doing a *very* good
    MrT impersonation!!!111  
    
    Haw haw haw!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.63ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYAD1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989Tue Jan 22 1991 17:4612
    I'm not making them out "to be that bad."  3rd place in the Big10
    and a top20 ranking is pretty good, but when you lose your top
    recruit and of necessity revert to 3-guard lineups and end up losing
    at home I think you see my point.
    
    This team is dangerous when they're shooting well, and only then.
    They're #3 ranking was a joke.  The Hoosiers have the Spartans in
    E. Lansing.  The bookies have MSU winning that one, which would
    then make IU a long shot for the Big10 Title and would see them
    at about #15 in the polls.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.64ESPN & Dick Vitale have had a *huge* impact on college hoopsRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 22 1991 18:1511
    Better get used to them high expectations MisterT.  I distinctly recall
    Dickie say last night that either IU or Duke will be his preseason #1
    pick for '91-'92.
    
    BTW, I disagree with all the anti-Vitale comments.  He's extremely
    knowledgeable and well-prepared.  As far as I'm concerned he's *way*
    above the competition (Packer, McGuire, etc.) in terms of overall
    knowledge of the game, and he's always up on the recruiting wars.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.65Yeah, but shaddup every over breath thenSHALOT::HUNTSo much for the Peace Dividend ...Tue Jan 22 1991 18:2514
15.66SACT41::ROSSWar, ugh, what is it good for?Tue Jan 22 1991 18:4816
I also think Vitale is head and shoulders above the rest.   He knows more
about the recruits, is great with getting into the spirit of college hoop,
and never is dull.   Billy Packer is okay x-an-o's wise, but has the
personality of what he is - a former ref.   Al McGuire - yuk!  He rarely
seemed to know who was on the court... vastly overrated in my book.

And let me say that I've been very impressed with Jim Valvano in the studio.
His blend of self-deprecating humor and knowledge of the game is refreshing.
I had lower expectations based on his stint with the "Wild and Wacky World
of Sports" {or whatever it was called}, but he's really surprised me.

Since MrT was man enough to not blame the refs last night, I will.  While
they didn't cost IU the game, they were as bad as usual in the Big 10.  There
never seems to be any cohesiveness among the refs.  One guy will call 
everything, one guy will call nothing, and the other one will only make
bad calls.   They've been bad for as long as I've watched the Big 10 - 1979.
15.67CHIEFF::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Tue Jan 22 1991 18:5818
 Nobody is denying Vitale's prep or knowledge it's his delievery I can't
 handle. It's one thing to be excited but he's excited to the point that
 he distracts from the game. He screams on routine plays like somebody
 just won a championship for petesakes and at first his top 5 or 10 lists
 we're ok but now he's got one for everything and I'm really not all that
 interested in everything that he thinks. He also has a bad habit of trumping
 the players that he is watching. Last night he was pushing JJ for top
 small forward in the country ahead of Owens. Next week he'll do a big east
 game and Owens will be the greatest thing since sliced bread.....

 Valvano is good in the studio, he's good on the air with Brent...

 for analyist I'll take Rafferty any day over Dicky. His knowledge is no less
 his delievery is better. He doesn't have the recruiting down like Dicky
 though...

 mike

15.68I disagree on every point, FWIW.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 22 1991 19:4213
    Rafferty is the poor mans Vitale.  As to his lists, I find them
    entertaining.  A welcome diversion from the usual boring color
    commentator.  The fact that he gets excited is, IMO, a *strength*, not
    a weakness.  He sincerely enjoys his work, and the enthusiasm is
    contagious.  Lastly, you imply that Vitale is inconsistent, one week
    calling JJ the best small forward, the next crowning Billy Owens the
    best.  I have NEVER caught Vitale being inconsistent.  In fact it's
    usually the opposite.  He labels somebody his best (in this case
    Jackson) and when Owens is playing he'll point out that he still
    considers Jackson the best.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.69as always agreeing to disagreeCHIEFF::CHILDSTrifecta confirmed. payoff due 9/12!Tue Jan 22 1991 20:2310
 Chris if you didn't disagree with everything I said, we'd have a problem. ;^)
 Sure at first he was refreshing and his ethusiasm was good but now he has
 become a caricuture of himself and goes overboard with it. Also does his
 mouth ever stop? Besides he fawns all over UNC and Deanho, need I another
 reason for my dislike?

 ;^)

 mike
15.701-21-91FORTSC::MOKTue Jan 22 1991 21:58138
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-22-91)  NCAA
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 1991 18:39:09 GMT
 
Saturday's Results:
 
#43 MICHIGAN STATE 73, #55 Minnesota 64:  The Spartans ripped out
	to an 18-point halftime margin and coasted home.  State led 45-27 at
	the break as Steve Smith had 19 in the half and generally had
	everyone shaking their heads.  Unfortunately, the Spartans had
	trouble sustaining this effort in the second half, as the Gophers
	had the lead cut to 5, 53-48, with 10:14 still to play.  But,
	a 3-point play and a trey by Smith kept Minnesota from getting
	any closer.  Smith has scored at least 20 points in 23 consecutive
	games.  Arriel McDonald, who has starred lately for the Gophers, led
	Minnesota with 25 points.  Kevin Lynch was off again, connecting on
	just 4 of 16 field goal attempts.  Minnesota outscored the Spartans
	by 10 from the field.  Another sellout of 15,138 at the Breslin
	Center...
 
#57 Michigan 69, #67 WISCONSIN 68 (OT):  It must be hell to be a
	Wisconsin basketball fan.  They saw the Badgers squander a 16-point
	second half lead and lose in overtime.  The Badgers led 35-21 at the
	break in totally dominating the Wolverines in the first half (just
	like they did against Iowa last week).  Wisconsin hit the first
	bucket of the second half to go up 37-21, then the roof caved in at
	Wisconsin Fieldhouse.  The Wolverines already had the lead cut down
	to 5 or less by the time both teams were in the 40's, and it was
	close the rest of the way although Michigan never tied it until the
	59-all score at the end of regulation.  Michigan opened up a 64-61
	lead in the OT, but Wisconsin regained the lead on free throws.
	Tony Tolbert gave Michigan a 69-68 lead with :05 left on a
	15-footer, and an apparent victory as the Wolverines broke up a
	last-ditch scoring opportunity.  BUT, a foul was called at the horn
	on Michael Talley, and Larry Hisle had a chance to win it.  But, he
	missed BOTH free throws, with no time on the clock, and a wild
	Michigan celebration ensued.  Hisle had been 7 for 8 from the stripe
	in the game before the misses.  He looked awful as he left the
	court.  Talley led Michigan with 18, including several great drives
	to the hoop for layins as Michigan's quickness won out.  Patrick
	Tompkins had 19 to lead Wisconsin.  Michigan outscored Wisconsin
	from the field by 22 points.  11,400 very disappointed fans in
	Madison...
 
#3  OHIO STATE 89, #62 Illinois 55:  It was close for a half, due
	to Buckeye turnovers, but Ohio State woke up in the second half and
	forced Illinois into a school-record 32 turnovers with it's swarming
	full-court, pressing defense.  The first half was very sloppy, with
	OSU leading just 30-27 at the break and neither team playing well.
	The first couple of minutes of the second half were the same, but
	then the OSU turnover patrol started.  Once the score reached 45-35,
	the inevitable occurred.  The crowd and Ohio State team went on a
	frenzy, and the score progressed to 63-43, then 70-45, and shortly
	thereafter the Buckeyes stretched the lead to 30 points and beyond.
	Jim Jackson led a balanced attack with 21 points.  Andy Kaufmann had
	14 for Illinois, even though Lou Henson benched him for 12 minutes
	of the first half in an effort to obtain greater teamwork.  There
	were 53 turnovers in all in this game.  As usual, 13,276 rowdy ones
	filled St. John Arena...
 
#5  Indiana 99, #49 IOWA 79:  The Hoosiers broke away from a 40-40
	halftime deadlock to route the Hawkeyes and their swiss-cheese
	defense.  Calbert Cheaney scored 30 points and Eric Anderson had 14
	to lead the Hoosiers.  Iowa coach Tom Davis described his team as
	"The reality is we just weren't up to it tonight... Maybe it was
	fatigue on our part".  Iowa led 43-40 early in the second half on an
	Acie Earl three-point play, but then IU went on a 17-5 run to go up
	59-50 with 14:55 left.  IU incredibly hit 14 of it's first 16 shots
	in the second half and ended up 61% from the field.  That's pretty
	tough to beat.  The Hoosiers maintained control of the game
	thereafter.  Earl led Iowa with 18 points.  The Hoosiers only hit 23
	of 35 freebies, before 15,500 at Iowa City...
 
NORTHEASTERN 84, #234 Northwestern 79:  The Huskies held off the
	Wildcats in this "Meeting of the Norths".  The Wildcats were down by
	5 at the break, 38-33, so they did make a game of it.  Northeastern
	won it's 6th straight, while NU has a losing streak going of at
	least 6.  Todd Leslie led the Cats with 22 points before 2,418 in
	Boston...
 
 
Monday Result:
 
#3  Ohio State 93, #5 INDIANA 85:  The Buckeyes beat the Hoosier
	team, the wild crowd, Mike and Dick, and the zebras.  Pretty
	good trick, eh?  Why is it that every time Indiana shoots within 10
	feet of the basket, the refs automatically blow the whistle?  Time
	and again in the second half last night, this happened even though
	the Buckeye defender did nothing but stand his ground, put his arms
	straight up and not jump!  Yet, those moving screens by Indiana
	(Bailey has learned well) went uncalled...  Then, the announcing
	zoo-crew of Mike Patrick and Dick Vitale seemed to question every
	call against Indiana in the second half.  Come on guys, I thought
	you were supposed to be neutral?  The game?  Well, OSU put on a
	clinical performance in the first half, even though IU went to
	the line 17 times before the break.  The Buckeyes led 21-12 halfway
	through it and had it up to 48-29 at the intermission.  The swarming
	OSU press had IU in a tizzy, as the Hoosiers had trouble just
	passing the ball or dribbling it.  Halftime came none too early for
	Bob Knight's crew.  Several Buckeyes were in foul trouble in the
	first half already, and both Jim Jackson and Perry Carter played
	only 9 minutes appiece due to it.  It was business as usual early in
	the second half for the Buckeyes, stretching the lead to 22 points
	on several occasions before IU finally got to it.  One 9-2 run got
	it going, but the Buckeyes seemed to get the lead back to 14 or 15
	without much trouble.  It was still 75-63 Buckeyes when IU finally
	broke the door down, and it got as close as 82-79 in the final
	2 minutes.  This game was not really decided until the final 25
	seconds as the Hoosiers finally missed a couple of shots and a
	couple of free throws.  Ohio State had the uncanny ability of
	hitting the crucial shot each time it was needed.  Though I don't
	have the final stats, Jamaal Brown had a career game for the
	Buckeyes, with 29 points.  A great win for the Buckeyes, and a
	great comeback for Indiana, as the Hoosiers really dialed up the
	defense in the second half.  The usual rabid 17,000+ filled the
	red, white and blue Assmebly Hall...
 
 
Wednesday:
 
	#43 Michigan State at #32 PURDUE   7:00 pm CST
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    3      4    Ohio State        16-0     6-0
   43     26    Michigan State    12-4     5-1
    5      3    Indiana           16-2     4-1
   62     36    Illinois          12-6     2-3
   32     40    Purdue            10-5     2-3
   55     44    Minnesota          9-6     2-3
   67     NR    Wisconsin          8-7     2-3
   49     24    Iowa              13-5     2-4
   57     NR    Michigan           9-7     2-4
  234     NR    Northwestern       5-10    0-5
15.71ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYAD1066,1215,1789,1848,1917,1989Wed Jan 23 1991 13:3633
    I learned long ago that one dares cry about obviously damaging 
    officiating after a win.  I'll say this, though: Used to be Bob
    got you +6 points a game with his intimidation act.  After a while
    it became "de rigeur" among refs - especially Big10 refs, the nation's
    worst - to do Bob up.  A ref could make a name for himself that way,
    Ed Hightower for example.  Eventually, Bob recognized this and now 
    he's one of the quietest coaches in the league.  But his legacy isn't
    yet shaken and now I rate Bob at a -6 points, with Mene Gene being
    the King of the Sideline (he even blows up when he *gets* a call!).
    
    As for the Hoosiers, they've played two blue chip clubs and the games
    were similar: nearly blown out, hanging on in the -15 to 20 range,
    the blue chip team loses concentration and hustle, and IU reverts to 
    a quick 3-guard lineup and scrapes back to make the loss look decent
    in the papers.  That isn't the mark of a #3 club. 
    
    WARNING: Watch out for Michigan State, Peplowski iand Steigenga are
    rolling now, and their guards have improved some, along with Smith
    playing more under control.  State has a shot at the Bucks for the
    Big10 Crown.
    
    Dropping to the 4-10 slots in the Big10, here's how I rank their
    "upset quotient":
    
    1. Illini (Deon be baaaad, Kaufman is a scorer, Kpedi a blocker)
    2. Iowa (Earl is 2nd best center behind Carter, great young talent)
    3. Purdue (burly, deep front-line but cruddy guards except for Trice)
    4. Wisconsin (it's 3-point time baby!!)
    5. Minnesota (2 senior starters will come on, youngsters improving)
    6. Michigan (great small men, but Riley's a bust)
    7. Northwestern (decimated by departures, a year of great let-down)
    
    Big10 Tom
15.72REVELATION OF FRAUD-HYPE !!ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYjust what did N. Fouquet know?Wed Jan 23 1991 19:5626
    PROOF !!  INCONTRAVERTABLE PROOF OF ANTI-BOB ANTI-IU HYPE !!
    
    I just watched a tape of the Buckeyes-Hoosiers clash with a close
    friend who's a_OSU grad (he insisted).  Everytime Damon Bailey
    was playing in and around the basket (which was a lot in the 2nd
    half, when he checked up at forward) and jumped up to the hoop I
    forced him to slo-mo to this alleged 39" leaper and freeze frame
    him at his apex.  The highest I caught him going was maybe, and
    this is a stretch, 18" (I have a_eye for this particular length
    cuz it's along the lines of my johnson ;^).  On one particular play
    his main, Treg Lee, was coming in for a lay-in, Damon went for the
    block, leaping, and his hand barely reached the rim.  Treg dumped
    in the two with impunity.
    
    Damon has great body control and cain drive to the hoop (though
    with his poor leaping ability he frequently gets his shots blocked
    or changed), but I challenge anybody out there to send me a tape 
    where he demonstrates any kind of mogambo leaping ability (i.e., with
    his haid and elbows up around the hoop, as is common with super leapers,
    ex-Hoosier Keith Smart for example).
    
    And speaking of Smart - a *real* leaper - I remember *him* grabbing
    'bounds against big guys and even blocking their shots.  Ain't seed 
    that yet with "superstar" Damon.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.73He's no Air Bailey but he ain't stuck to da floorSHALOT::HUNTGulf War = Iraqi Horror Picture ShowWed Jan 23 1991 20:3014
    Damon had at least one very agressive over-the-top-from-behind block on
    a Buckeye down in close to the hoop in the 2nd half.
    
    I don't know if it was 39" in the air but he was "up there" for sure.
    
    Bob Hunt
    
    
    
    
    P.S.  And I'm the Queen of England if your Johnson is anywhere near as
    "tall" as Bailey's max vertical leap.   Besides, it's the thickness
    that counts anyway.  Ever seen Shack's forearms, yeah, well, that's me,
    pal.  Pure heft.   Whomp.   :-) :-)
15.74SACT41::ROSSBeau Knows French!Thu Jan 24 1991 11:192
Purdue upset Michigan State {thanks to MrT's KOD} 62-51 and are now 3-3 in
the league, 11-5 overall.  
15.75SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Thu Jan 24 1991 11:5823
    
    
    	These vertical spec's are about as accurate as the NFL 40 yard
    times we see.  Most of those are done under very controlled
    circumstances and are hard to duplicate under game conditions.
    
    	As for the vertical question, if Bailey were 6'2''(don't know his
    exact height) and he had a 39'' vertical, that would put his haid only
    7'' under the rim.  Seven inches sounds like a lot, but the NBA and the
    NCAA have gone to the smaller boards and now the bottom of the rim 
    bracket is only 6 inches from the rim.  So, Bailey would be in effect
    hitting his haid on the backboard with a 39 in vertical with a height
    of 6'2''.  This doesn't even take account for arm length.  Assuming
    that he has "average" arms, his sleeve length is probably around 35-
    36 inches.  If he held his arms overhead and coupled with that 39in
    vertical, this would put his hands almost 3 feet over the rim!
    
    	As you cain see, this is kinda unlikely...I'm from Mo. so show me!
    
    These stats are highly inflated in my book.
    
    							bill..g.
    
15.76embarassing to ALL us Big10 Brethern...ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYjust what did N. Fouquet know?Thu Jan 24 1991 14:5121
    >Purdue upset Michigan State {thanks to MrT's KOD}
    
    Well this about sez it all now don't it?
    
    Poor-mouthing at its ultimate.  A Boiler alum publicly decrying a
    Purdue win as a_unfortunate product of some kinda kiss of death.
    This main engages here in what amounts to a_analytical variant of
    the game Naked Twister, controting, deforming, perverting good old
    rah-rah sports fervor into a bottom-feeding species of Machiavellian
    rhetoric.
    
    As for me, Dougie, I'll pass on this twisted game you play: *I* will
    root for *my* alma mater regardless of the consequences in notes. And
    I ain't gonna say "I hate to tell you I  told you so" cuz I DON'T hate
    to tell you I told you so cuz I DID tell you so but noooOOOooo you
    couldn't muster the requisite intellectual honesty to accede to the 
    self-evident Truth that Purdue is loaded with a mogambo front-line and
    frosh Linc Darner is bona-fide Big10 RoY meat cuz he shut down the
    league's PoY last nite maino-a-maino *HA* !!
    
    Big10 Tom 
15.77Might beDECWIN::SCHNEIDERI JUST WANNA SHOUT!Thu Jan 24 1991 15:408
    >This doesn't even take account for arm length.  Assuming
    >that he has "average" arms, his sleeve length is probably around 35-
    >36 inches.  If he held his arms overhead and coupled with that 39in
    >vertical, this would put his hands almost 3 feet over the rim!
    
    Only if his arm were attached to the top of his head!
    
    Dan           
15.78Dan, can you touch the net yet? :-)SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Thu Jan 24 1991 16:569
    
    re: dan
    
    	Wiseguy... O.K. if he were normal, his reach over the rim would be
    about 2 feet over the rim which still translates into an extraordinary
    leap.  I'm still skeptical!
    
    							bill..g.
    
15.79slow vs. quickITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYJust what did N. Fouquet know?Thu Jan 24 1991 17:5813
    bill..g., you're absolutely right about specs measured in tests 
    versus under real conditions.  SuperStiff Matt Nover, Indiana's
    starting "center" is a perfect example.  He was maybe the best
    high jumper in state H.S. history.  But when he *does* jump during
    games it's usually only a modest leap cuz the leaping technique 
    that got him over a 7' bar in the field is so excruciatingly slow
    as to be unusable in hoops, where the quickness of a leap is more
    important than its height.  More often than not Nover doesn't jump
    at all.  The only time I've seen his jumping prowess is when he's
    had the uncontested layup, which in his career has happened maybe
    twice.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.80**Attention NCAA Selection Committee! ATTENTION!!!**RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportThu Jan 24 1991 18:265
    Carolina's win @ Purdue is starting to look better-and-better. 
    Remember, we played 'em *before* they lost their best guard!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.81and othersHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughThu Jan 24 1991 18:295
>           -< **Attention NCAA Selection Committee!  ATTENTION!!!** >-

This is what NC State is saying after beating top 10 Duke.

TTom
15.82helpBIS1::ROOSENFri Jan 25 1991 05:229
    Can someone explain to me what's all about the BIG TEN and the PAC TEN.
    I follow the games as much as possible on Eurosport and in the
    conference, but it seems that in controversy to the NBA the overall
    standings are a minor priority regarding to the league.
    Example in precedent reply that Carolina has now 3-3 in the league and
    11-5 overall???
    Can someone show also the standings for all the leagues at this moment?
    
    Patrick
15.83ISLNDS::WASKOMFri Jan 25 1991 11:1538
    I'll try to help with some of it.
    
    In the US, there are so many colleges that play sports that they
    can't all play each other.  Colleges and universities that are of
    a similar size, place a similar emphasis on sports (and particular
    sports within the set of sports available to play) and geographically
    close have formed leagues.  Schools in the league play each
    other a set number of times each year and end the season with a
    league champion.  
    
    However, most of these schools want to play more
    games than there are other teams in their league, so they set up
    games with additional schools that they believe will accomplish
    a number of goals.  One might be getting a win, so their program
    will look good to the athletes they are trying to recruit and the
    pro scouts looking at their athletes.  Another might be that they
    think it will be a good "draw" - a team that will bring either TV
    viewers or lots of spectators or both.  A third might be stronger
    competition, so that their players improve by playing a tougher
    opponent.  There are some schools (Notre Dame is one) who are such
    a good draw that they have chosen not to belong to a league, but
    schedule all their games "independently" - hence they are called
    independents.
    
    The Big Ten is a league of 10 large universities in the mid-West 
    (Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Iowa).  
    The Pac Ten is a set of 10 large universities on the western coast 
    (California, Oregon, Washington, New Mexico and Arizona - maybe a 
    coupla other states).  Because the schools are so big, they have lots 
    of alumnae who want to watch their games.  They also put a lot of
    emphasis on sports, and are regarded as the training/proving ground
    for our professional leagues.  There are other leagues which share
    some characteristics with these two - the ACC (Atlantic Coast
    Conference) gets a lot of air-time in this file for example.  
    
    Hope this helps.  I'll let others post standings :-)
    
    A&W
15.84MCIS1::DHAMELPatriots: Lousy team, great missileFri Jan 25 1991 12:113
    
    Been taking John Hendry lessons, A&W?
    
15.85ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Jan 25 1991 13:155
    Can someone tell me who Arkansas lost to?  I'm wondering how 17-0 OSU
    can still be ranked behind them.  OSU has beaten several good teams:
    @Michigan,@Indiana,Georgetown(neutral),So Miss,Iowa...  of course, they
    played a Georgetown type schedule for the first 10 games or so.
       
15.86Arizona beat ArkansasHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughFri Jan 25 1991 13:283
Arkansas lost early to Arizona, I think in the NIT preseason.

TTom
15.87ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: NoTY 1990Fri Jan 25 1991 13:3939
    Groaner, another problem the Bucks have credibility wise is that 
    they beat Gougetown sans Alonzo Sneering, their best player.  I
    think the Buckeyes cain play with anybody right now, and may be 
    the best team in the nation.  They were here last night and phsycially
    manhandled the Golden Goofers.  They have all the pieces:
    
    Superstar fwd		Jim (aka JJ)
    
    Widebody fwd		Treg
    
    Nuclear widebody center	Perry
    
    Haidy playmaker		Baker
    
    3-point/defensive ace	Jamaal
    
    Bench			quick, big, hustling Jent et al
    
    The Buckeyes are clearly the class of the league.  I think the key for
    them is that they're based upon 3 widebody musclemen who cain 'bound and
    run the floor, which puts them in a position to run with UNLV, Arkansas,
    or anybody else with impunity.  Arkansas has no Jim.  I wonder if Larry
    Johnson is up to Jim's snuff.  Jim cain block, 'bound, pass, run, drive,
    and oh btw knock down the NBA trey.  Jamaal emerging as a 3-point artist
    slams the final nail in the coffin for the Little 9.
    
    Next year they pick up ThunderBurp, and go preseason #1.  (Isn't Perry 
    the only senior fer cripesakes?!)
    
    re: Bob & Ayers
    
    Turns out there's a big connection here: Bob set up Randy with his first
    job as asst. at Army, and played a role in getting him hired on as asst.
    at Bob's alma mater, and recommended him for the haid coaching post.
    
    Turns out that Ayers spoke at length with Bob before taking the chance 
    on ThunderBurp.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.88Who's champion?BIS1::ROOSENFri Jan 25 1991 13:488
    Thanks for the quick response, but still one question.
    Whenever they say here in Europe (in my case Belgium) that a certain
    university (eg. UCLA) has won the university title, does this mean that
    they won the PAC 10 competition or is it (this is what I think) that
    they won the play-offs between al the conferences (Big East,Big
    10,ACC,...)?
    
    Patrick
15.89SACT41::ROSSBeau Knows French!Fri Jan 25 1991 13:596
C'Mon T.. let's not get too carried away.  I've seen Larry Johnson, and
JJ is no Larry Johnson.   

JJ is the next Joe Dumars.
Larry Johnson will be the next Karl Malone.

15.90More JHendry-style infoISLNDS::WASKOMFri Jan 25 1991 16:0321
    re .88
    
    I'm not positive without better context.  The NCAA(National Collegiate
    Athletic Association) has a post-season tournament in basketball.
     Takes place in March.  Automatic entries in the tournament are
    given to the winners of designated leagues, plus a few (somebody
    help out here - how many?) slots for teams that are either independents
    or did well overall.  The winner of that tournament is the NCAA
    champ.  Last year I believe the winner was University of Nevada
    - Las Vegas (UNLV)??  The format of the tournament, invitations
    to participate, and seedings and locations of the games are all
    subjects of intense debate.  One of the consequences is that a team
    with an excellent overall record may not even get to play in the
    tournament, or a team that did well early but has injuries toward
    the end will be defeated early on.  Converses are, of course, also
    true.
    
    One of the difficulties with football is that there is no post-season
    tournament sanctioned by the NCAA to determine the overall "winner"
    - hence all the verbage here and other places about the "mythical
    number one".
15.91AGNT99::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidFri Jan 25 1991 16:3019
 How'd the Badgers make out last night? They were in the process of dumping
 NW before I drop off....I really like this team and look for them to pull
 off an upset of one of the Big 3 before it's all over....

 they've got to be one of the most unselfish teams I've watched this year..

 Arkansas was cruising against Zona holding a 9 point lead and Zona completely
 baffled. Ollie Miller took his 4th personal and a Technical. Zona hit all 4
 foul shots and then a 2 with the ball and steamrolled that into something
 like a 25-6 run to finish the game....

 JJ has the potential Doug to be much more than Larry cause he can play more
 than one posistion and play them all exceptionally well.......

 Larry's a 4 maybe a 3 but I don't think he has the ball handling skills to
 be more than an occasional 3....

 mike
15.92ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: NoTY 1990Fri Jan 25 1991 16:5438
    Jim cain score with impunity, only he digs passing so much that he
    dishes off a lot and therefore only scores 25 ppm.  This is where 
    Jim rises above Steve Smith or Calbert.  I think that Larry Johnson
    is a bit overrated cuz they play the kind of game where spectacular
    moments are maximized.  Jim is no showboat, just Mr. Efficiency.  He
    also plays with great emotion and plays great D.
    
    Wisconsin's Patrick Tompkins scored a career-high 29 pts. last night.
    This team looke to be a low rent Willie Simms road show, but players
    are emerging, Tompkins among them.  Yoder seems to've decided to go
    with the trey against the good teams and to rely on his two fine 
    widebodies in the paint against the lesser teams.  Wisconsin-Purdue
    is gonna be a mighty interesting game from the development standpoint,
    both have tournament potential if they cain show any consistency.
    
    Indiana knocked off the Wolverines last night in Crisler.  A_important
    win for them, losing there would've pretty much ruined them on the
    season.  But, again, they were outrebounded by 10 by a team that's
    *very* weak inside and went pretty much with 3 guards all the way.
    Gregg Graham emerged with a big 19 point night, helping Indiana to a 
    road win even though Cheaney shot poorly (17), Anderson chipped in 15.
    
    From the box it looks like Bob kept his two stiff middlemen on the
    bench where they cain do no harm.  Michigan is an ideal matchup foe for
    the Hoosiers (small, not one widebody, poor shot selection, etc.), but
    a pattern seems to be emerging where Indiana plays well against the
    weak teams but brushes with being blown off the floor against the good
    ones, especially the big ones (IU had to come back from way down against
    lowly - but big - Notre Dame).  I look towards the Hoosier-Illini clash
    for a reading as to how they're likely to fare in the tournament.
    
    The Hoosiers have State tomorrow in E. Lansing.  That could be real 
    ugly for them.  Especially now that State is fighting for its life,
    they'll be giving no breaks (except maybe bones underneath).
    
    Big10 Tom 
    
    
15.93how 'bout BrownHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughFri Jan 25 1991 17:496
T, and others: What's the deal with the other Ohio St Forward, Brown. He
had 20 or so the other night against IU. Was that a career game?

Much obliged

TTom
15.94Career highDECWIN::SCHNEIDERI JUST WANNA SHOUT!Fri Jan 25 1991 18:317
    TTom, I think Brown had 28 or 29 in the OU-IU game.  They said his
    previous high was 20.  He killed the Hoosiers early with the trey.
    
    From what was said, I got the feeling that he isn't usually much of an
    offensive player, but they were going with the hot hand.
    
    Dan
15.95ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: NoTY 1990Fri Jan 25 1991 18:5232
    Jamaal's their off-guard.  Word has it that once the Bucks got thru
    the Gougetown-style cupcake portion of their schedule Ayers noticed
    a lot of doubling on JJ.  Remember, Lee and Carter aren't jump shooters
    by any stretch.  Baker is an excellent driver but not a great J-shooter
    either.  This left Jamaal, who wasn't so much of bad shooter before but
    just got the green light for the first time recently.  He continued
    with the treys and Js last night against Minnesota.  Everybody's looking
    for Brown to keep shooting from the outside to keep the court open for
    them.  In the Big10 you must do this or you get killed with zones by
    teams like State and Purdue.  A shooting guard was the only missing part
    but now Ayers thinks he has that too.
    
    Jent, the scrapper swingman off the bench is a fair jump shooter
    himself (I've played street hoops with him when he was in high school
    in Jersey, he liked to shoot from 20+ there).
    
    Impressive to me is Robinson, the 7 ft. stiff substitute center.  IU
    should have a stiff this good.  He's really picked up some skills that
    were absent last year, fouling less, playing some D, and actually 
    leaving the floor on his "jumps."  Obviously, he'd be the best center
    in a decade if he were on the Hoosier squad.
    
    Many people at Williams last night commented on 3 things:
    
    1) Bucks' strength, muscle, studliness even down to lil' Baker.
    2) Bucks' depth.
    3) They have this look of total-control confidence about them, but 
       also look like they're on a mission.  They have the air of a champ
       about them, like they cain turn it on whenver needed.  Perry Carter
       is their emotional leader; JJ is their star.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.96OSU deserves #1 ranking right now, IMHO.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Jan 25 1991 19:0716
    If the NCAA tourney were held today my money might very well get behind
    the Buckeyes to win the whole enchilada.  They're tough, man.  *TOUGH*.
    
    Trouble is though the NCAA crowns its champeen by the team that
    exhibits *season-ending* peak form.  Anything less just gets ya
    a_excellent loss label.  In both '84 and '87 Carolina played stellar
    hoops during the season, easily as strong as the '82 bunch.  Both
    of these squads went undefeated in ACC conference play - an incredible
    accomplishment.  Alas though, neither squad even got to the Final 4.
    
    What's my point?  Simply that it seems to be a rare occurence that a
    team playing as well as OSU is right now will win a Title, or even make
    it to Indy.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.97ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYJust what did N. Fouquet know?Fri Jan 25 1991 19:1312
    ACCCrisp, must you drag the Buckeyes down into the mire that your
    choke-a-holic hero has made for himself?  Understand that for this
    self-serving analogy of yours to work OSU'd have to be in this 
    position 8 years out of 10 for three decades and STILL have only 
    the one Title that they do have.
    
    Nice try, though.
    
    If IU loses at State they could drop out of the top20, which would
    be the biggest slide seen since the paper tiger UVA gridders.

    Big10 Tom
15.98T talks subjective trash; ACC Chris hits with cold objectivity.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Jan 25 1991 19:2010
    Your outrageously false exagerations aside, I want it known that I'm
    serious here.
    
    When was the last time a team playing as well as OSU is right now in
    mid/late January gone on to win a Title?
    
    The '82 Heels might be the last one ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.99MSU-PU reportFORTSC::MOKSat Jan 26 1991 15:5754
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-24-91)  NCAA
Date: 24 Jan 91 18:32:52 GMT
 
[Here's a little tidbit from Lou Henson yesterday to help everyone get
focused for this coming Monday's Iowa at Illinois extraveganza:
 
"It'll be a long, long time before that feeling (anti-Iowa) changes.
Our players are close to Deon Thomas, just as they were before he came
to Illinois, and they know what he went through during the past year,
and why he went through it.  When a staff does what the Iowa staff did,
using tactics to attempt to destroy a young man and a basketball
program, you can't help but feel that way.  We won't soon forget it, and
I can't say everything is fine because it's not.  We're not letting what
Iowa did slide by."
 
An unrelated quote from Tom Davis, when asked about the "vengeful nature
of the Illinois crowd":
 
"They (Illinois) did a terrific job with that last year.  It's a tough
place to play, but you have to prepare for that everywhere you go in the
Big Ten.  I approach it like any other game and I'll try to keep my club
focused on the game."
 
Bruce Pearl plans to attend Monday's game...]
 
 
Wednesday's Results:
 
 
#29 PURDUE 62, #30 Michigan State 51:  Purdue's offensive funk
	continued during the first 12 minutes of this game, but then
	everything changed and the Boilers won a big ballgame.  With just
	under 8 minutes remaning in the first half, Michigan State led 20-9.
	But, then it was the Spartans turn to cool, as Purdue ran off 15
	straight points to go ahead and never trail again.  A couple of
	baskets were traded to produce a 28-23 Purdue advantage heading into
	the locker room.  State managed to tie the game at 34 with 15:05 to
	play on a Steve Smith trey, but Purdue then gained a 7-point
	advantage at 43-36.  MSU came back with 5 straight to cut the lead
	to 2 with 7:54 left, but Purdue followed with a 5-2 run to go ahead
	48-43.  The lead was still 5 at 52-47 when Purdue blew out to a
	59-47 advantage.  An Andy Penick basket at :49 ended another MSU
	scoring drought.  Twelve of Purdue's final 14 points came at the
	stripe as the Spartans attempted to stay close by fouling.  Linc
	Darner was the offensive and defensive star for Purdue, scoring 16
	points and helping to hold Smith to just 20 points (his average is
	28.1).  Smith was the only Spartan in double figures.  Matt
	Steigenga only managed 4 points.  Mike Peplowski had 9 points and 9
	boards.  Jimmy Oliver added 15 for Purdue, and Chuckie White had 13
	points and 6 carroms.  14,123 at Mackey Arena...
 
    [....]
15.100Thursday night 1-24-91 gamesFORTSC::MOKSat Jan 26 1991 15:5874
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-25-91)  NCAA
Date: 25 Jan 91 17:19:42 GMT
 
For those of you who keep track, Purdue's 26-game winning streak against
Wisconsin will be put to the test tomorrow in Madison.  January 1977
marked the last Badger win in this series, a two-pointer at Wisconsin
Fieldhouse...
 
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#6  Indiana 70, #51 MICHIGAN 60:  Michigan hung tough until the
	final five minutes of this game at Crisler Arena.  Greg Graham was
	the scoring star for Indiana, hitting for 19 points.  Damon Bailey
	did not play due to a left thigh bruise.  The Hoosiers led 33-28 at
	the break and managed a couple of 8-point leads early in the second
	half before the Wolverines came back to trail by only 49-48 about
	midway through the second half.  Michigan had one chance to take the
	lead or tie at that point, but Eric Riley missed a short jumper and
	the Hoosiers returned the favor with a 3-point play at the other
	end.  IU eventually rolled out to a 70-56 advantage just before the
	end in a finish reminiscent of Michigan's against Ohio State a few
	weeks ago.  A pretty docile crowd by the sounds of it last night...
 
#2  Ohio State 80, #60 MINNESOTA 70:  The Buckeyes solidified their
	position at the top of the standings with a convincing win over the
	Gophers at Williams Arena.  OSU used a 21-8 first half run to gain a
	lead it would never relinquish.  The Gophers only got as close as
	6 points in the second half.  Kevin Lynch had a big ballgame for
	Minnesota, but it wasn't enough.  Jamaal Brown had 17 points for
	OSU, and keyed the big first half run.  This is Ohio State's best
	start (17-0 currently) since the 1962 season...
 
#61 Wisconsin 74, #210 NORTHWESTERN 57:  The Badgers came up with a
	rare Big Ten road victory by whipping the Cats at Welsh-Ryan Arena.
	The first half was close, but the Badgers pulled away early in the
	second half and coasted home.  Burly Patrick Tompkins led Wisconsin
	with a career-high 28 points...
 
 
Saturday:
 
	#68  Illinois at #51 MICHIGAN                Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#30  Michigan State at #6 INDIANA            2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#29  Purdue at #61 WISCONSIN                 4:00 pm
	#60  Minnesota at #210 NORTHWESTERN          7:00 pm
 
Monday:
 
	#62  Iowa at #68 ILLINOIS                    8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    2      4    Ohio State        17-0     7-0
    6      3    Indiana           17-2     5-1
   30     22    Michigan State    12-5     5-2
   29     NR    Purdue            11-5     3-3
   61     NR    Wisconsin          9-7     3-3
   68     NR    Illinois          12-6     2-3
   60     NR    Minnesota          9-7     2-4
   62     31    Iowa              13-5     2-4
   51     NR    Michigan           9-8     2-5
  210     NR    Northwestern       5-11    0-6
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Randy Peppler                        peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu |
| Illinois State Water Survey      or: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu        |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15.101SACT41::ROSSWho dares to mock me?Mon Jan 28 1991 11:457
Indiana continued to enforce MrT's KOD on Michigan State, beating them
badly at Bloomington.  Superstar freshman Damon Bailey led the team with 19,
but it is not sure how far off the ground he jumped.

MrT's KOD worked again on Purdue... who traveled to Wisconsin and were beat
66-44.   They're still a fine bunch of widebody studs, right MrT?   They're
a .500 ballclub.  Nothing  more.
15.102ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYJust what did N. Fouquet know?Mon Jan 28 1991 12:5022
    Who you kidding Ross?  Losing at Mad City no longer carries the
    humiliating stigma it once did.  Tompkins & Simms cain mix it up
    with anybody, and when their long range shooters are on target 
    this squad plays like they belong in the top10.  Btw, during the
    State - IU game Peplowski laid some muscle on somebody and colormain
    Greg Kelser remarked, "Peplowski is so strong, there are only three
    middlemen in the Big10 who can bang with him: Tompkins of Wisconsin,
    Earl of Iowa, and Riley of Purdue."  Why he failed to mention the 
    strongest main in the leauge, Perry Carter, escapes me.  But you 
    get the point.  Gene must win this year, he's been blessed with a
    fantastic front-line, and if he fritters it away this will reflect
    poorly on his coaching record.  He's got three guys who'd start 
    ahaid of poor Matt Nover, so it's put up or shut-up time for Keady.
    
    re: ACCrisp
    
    How 'bout last year's UNLV Rebels, for starters.  Michigan comes
    to mind before that, and so on.  You get the idea too, hopefully.
    Remember that OSU woulda lost a game by now probably had they not
    played a Gougetown Cupcake preconference.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.103MSU might get there though ...RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportMon Jan 28 1991 13:1213
    Vegas don't count, cause they didn't play the kind of grueling
    mid-season schedule that OSU is encountering right now.
    
    Michigan?  Come off it.  They weren't even one of the top seeds in
    their regional when they won their unlikely Title, so's I doubt they
    were playing the ultra-high level of hoops that OSU is playing right
    now.
    
    No, mark my words:  OSU will not reach the Final 4.  They're peaking at
    this very moment ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.104SACT41::ROSSWho dares to mock me?Mon Jan 28 1991 14:0818
Hey, MrT, did you happen to see Larry Johnson against Louisville Saturday?
29 points and 13 boards and he was out of there for much of the end.   He
also showed he can handle the ball, at one point taking a pass at the top
of the key, doing a crossover dribble drive to the hoop, leaving his man
in the dust.   He's better than Jimmy Jackson... right now.  

If I were drafting in the NBA, and everybody was available, I'd take:

	1. Shaquille O'Neal
	2. Larry Johnson
	3. Jimmy Jackson
	4. Doug Smith
	5. Billy Owens
	6. Calbert Cheaney
	7. Steve Smith
	8. Kenny Anderson
	9. Dikembe Motuombo
       10. Christian Laettner
15.105ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewTue Jan 29 1991 14:137
    What?  I didn't see Alonzo Sneering on that list.
    
    Acie Earl looked pretty tasty last night to a poor Hoosier fan not
    accustomed to having Division I-A middlemen around. Deon didn't look 
    too shabby, either.  
    
    Big10 Tom
15.1063's away....CNTROL::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidTue Jan 29 1991 14:5511
 Deon looked great physically but I don't recall him doing all that much.
 Of course I missed the tail end of the game but for all the talk about
 how he was going to pay back Iowa I expected a monster of a performance
 which I didn't see. Possibly Acie and the other Iowa widebodies had
 something to do with this....

 the Badgers will beat the Buckeyes...

 mike 
 
15.107ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Tue Jan 29 1991 15:475
    
    The best thing about the Bucks this year is that Taylor is NOT
    the coach.  Too many times did the team go into the NCAA tourney
    with high expectations only to lose very early.  I remember 
    specifically the team with Kellogg that lost to UCLA.  
15.108Who else is on probation?WORDY::NAZZAROWe don't rent pigsTue Jan 29 1991 16:3111
    Nice idea - the top ten guys you'd take if everyone were eligible
    and the draft was today.  I would include Shawn Bradley and Stacey 
    Augmon in my Top Ten, leaving out Cheaney and Laettner.  And Bradley
    would be third, behind Shaq and Mutombo.  The others, in order,
    Larry Johnson, Steve Smith, Doug Smith, Jimmy Jackson, Billy Owens,
    Kenny Anderson, and Augmon.
    
    BTW - does anyone know which teams besides Kentucky are ineligible
    for post-season play?
    
    NAZZ
15.109Big Ten results last SaturdayFORTSC::MOKTue Jan 29 1991 17:4292
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-28-91)  NCAA
Date: 28 Jan 91 23:43:38 GMT
 
 
Saturday's Results:
 
#68 Illinois 72, #51 MICHIGAN 67:  Michigan led early 9-0 and 14-4,
	but once Illinois caught up later in the first half, the game was in
	doubt until the final minute, as Larry Smith pretty much won it by
	himself with 22 second-half points (he had 28 overall).  The
	Wolverines lost the first half lead briefly but regained it to take
	a 37-32 advantage to the lockeroom.  Illinois got things tied up
	pretty quickly in the second half, and the game pretty much
	see-sawed the rest of the way.  Michigan had one six-point run from
	Sam Mitchell which turned a 52-49 deficit into a 55-52 lead.  But,
	an Illinois timeout seemed to change things, and the Illini took the
	lead for good when the score reached the low 60's.  Demetrius Calip
	had 25 for Michigan, but got most of them in the first half.  The
	pivital play of the game occurred with 1:25 left and Michigan
	trailing 65-64.  The Wolverines were trying to set Calip up with a
	shot, but Smith intercepted one of those "skip" passes and flew down
	for a jam.  11,707 at Crisler, with echoes of "Hail to the Victors"
	still rattling in their brains...
 
#6  INDIANA 97, #30 Michigan State 65:  IU had a great first half,
	leading 46-30.  Then the Hoosiers hit 13 of their first 17 second
	half shots.  Game OVER!  This was a complete, thorough blowout off
	the Spartans, as the crowd in Bloomington must have been hoarse
	afterwards.  Steve Smith was held to just 14 points, a season-low
	for him (he had been averaging 27.6 ppg).  Damon Bailey, conversely,
	scored a career-high 19.  The Hoosiers ended up 37 of 57 from the
	field, with five players reaching double figures.  Bob Knight's son,
	Pat, even managed 8 points himself.  Matt Steigenga was a lone
	bright spot for Jud Heathcote with 16 points.  Jud said, "We played
	so bad here.  Is is time to make changes, try some different things?
	We're not getting better and that is a concern.  17,298 in
	Bloomington...
 
#61 WISCONSIN 66, #29 Purdue 44:  I'll deviate from the normal
	format a bit to give you a running score, so that you can see how
	pathetic Purdue's offense can be at times.  Don't be fooled by the
	final score.  It wasn't *that* close, as the February 10, 1977 to
	January 26, 1991, 26-game Purdue win streak was blown to hell at the
	Wisconsin Fieldhouse:
 
				WIS			Pur
				---			---
				4			0
				6			4
				9			6
				14			6
				14			8
				25			8	10:30 left, Badgers 10 for 12, 4-4 treys
				28			8	About 5 minutes left
				32			10
	Half		34			14	Pur: 6 for 21, only White, Riley score
 
				43			14	15+ left
				44			20	12:16 left, Wisconsin had cooled
				53			20	7:57 left, still only White, Riley
				53			25	6:50 left, Darner hits trey
				59			33	3:27 left, Yoder goes to deep bench
				64			35	2:00 left, Purdue 14 of 44
	Final		66			44	Jimmy Oliver SCORELESS!!! Pur 16 of 48
 
	Gene Keady termed the performance "sick" in his postgame interview.
	Wisconsin decided the game early, with it's great shooting, but even
	the Badgers really didn't do much the final 30 minutes of the game.
	If they had, this would have been about 90-44.  Purdue had one
	8-minute scoreless streak in the first half, to go with the 9-minute
	one at Minnesota last week and the 5+ minute one against Michigan
	State.  All credit goes to the Badgers here, for playing a great
	defensive game on Jimmy Oliver.  Chuckie White had a good ballgame,
	but that was it.  Willie Simms led the Badgers with 11 points and
	the great defense on Oliver, who had an 18.1 scoring average.  The
	fivesome Oliver, Travis Trice, Linc Darner, Ian Stanback and Matt
	Painter were a combined 4 for 27 from the floor.  Dave Barrett
	played a good deal of the game and didn't even attempt at shot...
	11,482 howling fans at Madison... [This is for Charlie:  Both
	Machelle Joseph and Joy Holmes are better than some of the men!]
 
#60 Minnesota 85, #210 NORTHWESTERN 68:  The Gophers notched an easy
	win in Evanston.  Randy Carter scored a career-high 29 points for
	Minnesota, and Kevin Lynch chipped in with 18.  Pat Baldwin led the
	Cats with 17.  The Gophers led by only 5 at the break, 37-32, but
	got things rolling in the second half.  No other details thanks to
	my wonderful local paper, other than 6,419 at Welsh-Ryan...
 

[....]
15.110Monday night gameFORTSC::MOKTue Jan 29 1991 17:48103
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-29-91)  NCAA
Date: 29 Jan 91 17:20:30 GMT
 
Three points:
 
	(1)  Besides Ohio State and Indiana, the Big Ten appears to be as
	weak top-to-bottom as it has been in a long, long time.  If somehow
	Illinois would manage to finish fourth (I still have faith in
	Michigan State to take third), I would not be surprised if only 3
	teams are picked for the NCAA tournament, as the next candidate teams
	would be fifth or lower.  After witnessing last night's performance,
	and comparing it to the earlier Syracuse-UConn game and then later
	to UNLV jumping ahead of Utah State 20-2, I'd have to say the Big
	Ten has seen better days...
 
	(2)  Is anyone else getting tired of missing action on these ESPN
	games because Mike and Dick are talking about something else?  Last
	night, with Illinois up by just a point, we had no idea that
	Rennie Clemens missed the front end of a two-shot foul, and had to
	wait until the scoreboard in the arena was shown to note that he did
	indeed miss the shot!  The cameras didn't bother to show the shot
	either...
 
	(3)  Can you believe that TWO writers changed their first-place
	votes in this week's AP poll from UNLV to Ohio State???  I wonder
	how they can justify that?  I wasn't aware that UNLV had done so
	poorly lately...
 
 
Monday's Result:
 
#68 ILLINOIS 53, #62 Iowa 50:  Illinois did nothing right the final
	6 minutes of the game last night, yet managed to hold on as Iowa
	either couldn't hit a free throw or Acie Earl tried a really dumb
	offensive move.  A 7-footer trying to do dribble moves?  Val Barnes
	was the guy to get the ball to down the stretch, but his teammates
	never really looked for him.  He usually had to take it upon himself
	if he touched the ball.  Larry Smith won the game again for
	Illinois.  Andy Kaufmann's stint in Lou Henson's doghouse has broken
	his spirit, don't you think?  He doesn't look anything like the
	player I saw single-handedly bring the Illini back from the dead
	against Purdue a few weeks ago...  The score was tied at only 17-all
	with just 3:25 left in the first half.  Illinois then asserted
	itself, building leads of 28-21, 41-26, and 47-33 with less than 10
	minutes to go, when the Iowa offense finally woke up and made a game
	of it.  Actually, with the Illini repeatedly turning the ball over,
	taking their own dumb shots and missing a boatload of FTs, Iowa
	really could have won this game had they done anything in the final
	2 minutes.  The Hawkeyes ended up shooting as badly as Purdue did at
	Wisconsin Saturday, but almost won anyway.  Guess which great
	shooting teams are playing each other this Thursday???  The biggest
	attendance of the year made it to the Assembly Hall for this blood
	match.  The crowd only got ugly once, throwing debris on the floor
	after an Andy Kaufmann travel (replay vindicated the refs).  Dr. Tom
	was looking for hands to shake after the game, but he didn't appear
	to find many.  Illinois now hosts Wisconsin and Northwestern in an
	unusual schedule which will see them play 6 of their first 9
	conference games at home.  The second half could be rough...
 
 
Wednesday:
 
	#61  Wisconsin at # 6 INDIANA		     7:00 pm CST
 
Thursday:
 
	#62  Iowa at #29 PURDUE				     7:00 pm
	#51  Michigan at #60 MINNESOTA		     7:00 pm
	#2   Ohio State at #30 MICHIGAN STATE    7:00 pm ESPN (!)
 
Saturday:
 
	#61  Wisconsin at #68 ILLINOIS           Noon    Big Ten/Raycom
	#210 Northwestern at #62 IOWA            2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
 
Sunday (FINALLY!!):
 
	#29  Purdue at #2 OHIO STATE             1:00 pm ABC (National)
	#6   Indiana at #60 MINNESOTA            3:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
 
Next Monday:
 
	#210 Northwestern at #68 ILLINOIS		8:30 pm ESPN (ugh!)
 
 
RECORDS:
 
 (Old)  (New)
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    2      3    Ohio State        17-0     7-0
    6      4    Indiana           18-2     6-1
   30     34    Michigan State    12-6     5-3
   68     NR    Illinois          14-6     4-3
   61     NR    Wisconsin         10-7     4-3
   29     NR    Purdue            11-6     3-4
   60     NR    Minnesota         10-7     3-4
   62     40    Iowa              13-6     2-5
   51     NR    Michigan           9-9     2-6
  210     NR    Northwestern       5-12    0-7
15.111Md, Ill, Mo also on probationHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughTue Jan 29 1991 19:418
Nazz,

Maryland (last year, this year), Illinois (this year, next year) and
Missouri (this year, next year) are also ineligible.

There may be more.

TTom
15.112CNTROL::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidWed Jan 30 1991 11:386

 Mine would be, Shack, Mutumbo, Anderson, Owens, JJ, Larry, Doug Smith,
 Stith, Mourning and Murdock...

 mike
15.113ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYMike Heiser, R.I.P.Wed Jan 30 1991 14:2911
    1.  Shack (is Allah)
    2.  Jim Jackson
    3.  Larry Johnson
    4.  Billy Owens
    5.  Alonzo Sneering
    6.  Steve Smith
    7.  Brian Stith
    8.  Kenny Anderson
    9.  Doug Smith
    10. Dikembe Mutumbo
       
15.114ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYJust what did N. Fouquet know?Wed Jan 30 1991 15:218
    Hate to say it but I have to agree with Lou Henson on the unscrupulous
    behavior of Dr. Tom Davis & Company.  Much ado about nothing, after all
    the wild accusations about "$80,000 + Chevy Blazer" turns out it was more
    like "$20 + bus money to mom's funeral."  Reason I hate to say it is that
    Deon woulda been MUCH happier had he gone on down to Bloomington where
    he belongs.  
    
    Big10 Tom
15.115Heard this tune beforeNEMAIL::LEARYMWed Jan 30 1991 18:086
    Re. -1
    
    Yeah, 
      Sounds familiar( see Holtz ). And Holtz got pilloried for the same
    basic thing.
    
15.116He's going to make them forget Steve AlfordSACT41::ROSSCaught up in 'As DEC Turns'Thu Jan 31 1991 12:116
Indiana whipped Wisconsin last night at Bloomington... Non-leaper Damon
Bailey led the team in scoring for the second straight game with 21.  Damon
will end the season with more points than all of the Tar Heel Superfrosh
combined.

Mrt, please sign in and discount Damon's play as mediocre.
15.117they'll get even at homeCHIEFF::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidThu Jan 31 1991 13:537
 Any more details than that Doug. I mean I would have thought that those
 the Badgers would have made a game of it. Especially considering that
 Tompkins and Simms are of the widebody variety that Bob can only have
 wet dreams about???

 mike
15.118SACT41::ROSSCaught up in 'As DEC Turns'Thu Jan 31 1991 14:3623
From AP:

	Damon Bailey scored 21 points at Bloomington, In and Calbert Cheaney 
	added 14 as No. 4 Indiana defeated Wisconsin for the 22nd consecutive
	time.
	Indiana (19-2, 7-1) led by as many as 14 points in the first half,
	helped by a tenacious defense that held the Badgers scoreless for
	separate stretches of 3 and 4 minutes.
	The Badgers (10-8, 4-4) pulled to 34-24 at the half, then came on
	strong at the beginning of the second half.

	{that's it... seems like we missed the good stuff due to space
	 considerations... I can't complain, though.  The Columbia, SC
	newspaper has more scores and more writeups about college hoop
	than any paper I've seen.   Plus they get the late scores too.}


---

	Ohio State versus Michigan State tonight on ESPN.   A Spartan
	loss will make the Big 10 a two team race.  The conference season
	will be at its halfway point on Saturday.   Any team with 3 or
	more losses is done.
15.119More details on UW-IU game last nightFORTSC::MOKThu Jan 31 1991 16:1263
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (1-31-91)  NCAA
Date: 31 Jan 91 15:50:41 GMT
 
Wednesday's Result:
 
#4  INDIANA 73, #48 Wisconsin 57:  The Badgers managed to do what
	some recent teams visiting Bloomington could not do:  not get blown
	out.  IU had a couple of early 14 point leads and it looked bad for
	Wisconsin, but the Badgers fought back and only trailed by 10 at
	halftime (34-24) after having been down by just 8 points.  Early in
	the second half, they even had the lead down to 7 at 38-31.  At
	40-32, IU scored 12 straight points to take a 50-32 lead, and managed
	to stay ahead by at least 15 the rest of the way.  The largest lead
	was at 60-39.  Damon Bailey scored a career-high 21 points (he's
	made his last 7 three-point attempts), despite finding out earlier in
	the day that his sister has cancer.  Calbert Cheaney had 14 points
	on perfect shooting.  Pat Thompkins and Willie Simms starred for
	Wisconsin, but gunner Tim Locum was scoreless.  IU was 19 of 20 from
	the stripe in a great shooting display.  Both teams were below 50%
	from the field, however.  The Assembly Hall sellout was a bit
	quieter than usual as Wisconsin's defense held the Hoosiers in check
	more than usual...
 
 
Tonight:
 
	#2   Ohio State at #41 MICHIGAN STATE		6:00 pm ESPN
	#59  Iowa at #35 PURDUE					7:00 pm
	#69  Michigan at #54 MINNESOTA			7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#48  Wisconsin at #60 ILLINOIS			Noon    Big Ten/Raycom
	#228 Northwestern at #59 IOWA			2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
 
Sunday:
 
	#35  Purdue at #2 OHIO STATE			1:00 pm ABC
	#4   Indiana at #54 MINNESOTA			3:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
 
Monday:
 
	#228 Northwestern at #60 ILLINOIS		8:30 pm ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    2      3    Ohio State        17-0     7-0
    4      4    Indiana           19-2     7-1
   41     34    Michigan State    12-6     5-3
   60     NR    Illinois          14-6     4-3
   48     NR    Wisconsin         10-8     4-4
   35     NR    Purdue            11-6     3-4
   54     NR    Minnesota         10-7     3-4
   59     40    Iowa              13-6     2-5
   69     NR    Michigan           9-9     2-6
  228     NR    Northwestern       5-12    0-7
    
15.120CHIEFF::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidThu Jan 31 1991 16:144
 Thanks Doug. Gametime 7:30, 8:00 for tonight?

 mike
15.121to answer myself 7:00 thanks Charles for the report and timeCHIEFF::CHILDSWhen love rears up it's ugly haidThu Jan 31 1991 16:210
15.122ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Jan 31 1991 17:1521
    >Mrt, please sign in and discount Damon's play as mediocre.
    
    Now dagblamit Doug that's just plain UNFAIR.  Ain't said that Damon
    is mediocre.  All I said was coming outta H.S. this kid had a build
    up comparable to that of Lou Alcindor and what we end up seeing is a
    kid with limitations too-often described by commentators in "but she
    has a nice personality" terms.  When the hype was going down I had
    visions dancing in my haid of a power player capable of playing the
    front-line with sneering impunity (slam-jams, blocked shots, mogambo
    nuclear rebounds, etc.), and when I first saw him in big-time
    competition I logged the same disappointment as YOU.
    
    Btw, this is the Midwest, so it goes without saying that the game
    wasn't broadcast here - we got Big East and Almost Close action just
    like the other 6 nights of the week...  Also, it was the Hoosiers'
    22nd straight victory at HOME against the Badgers.
    
    Big game tonight from the standpoint of Hoosier fans.  And I'll be in
    row 16 in the barn Sunday afternoon with my print-outs at the ready.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.123prediction...ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Thu Jan 31 1991 17:474
    
    OSU by 4 over MSU in a close one.  Jackson and Lee get in foul
    trouble early.
    
15.124ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Jan 31 1991 18:1516
    >Holtz got pilloried for the same basic thing.
    
    Watch it with the past tense there!  Holtz goes before the Infraction
    Committee this Friday.  In this morning's Mpls paper they had a_expert
    saying that Holtz did the same thing that Galen Hall did and that there
    was pressure to have the same punishment assessed on Lou: 5 yr ban from
    NCAA coaching.  The same article quoted Texas Christian's coach saying
    that Lou's mistake was being honest, which may have put him on a
    different level as a person but will see him on a higher level of
    punishment for having done so.
    
    As a Notre Dame grid fan I'm hoping Lou doesn't get it, but part of the
    guy's charm is how he relates to people, and in this case it may see
    him outta college grid.
    
    Big10 Tom 
15.125SACT41::ROSSCaught up in 'As DEC Turns'Fri Feb 01 1991 10:427
A big night of upsets in the Big 10 on Thursday.

First Michigan State beat Ohio State 75-61 at MSU.
Then  Iowa beat Purdue {that talented team} 78-69 on Purdue's home court.
And   Michigan beat Minnesota  66-62.

Indiana and Ohio State are now tied for the Big 10 lead.
15.126Is there anything Smith can't do?CHIEFF::CHILDSI'm a victim of SADORISISFri Feb 01 1991 12:299
 Saw alot of the MSU game and they flat out wanted it more than OSU. They
 played up to the potential of their pre-season ranking. Hard to believe
 they lost by 30 to the smaller Hooisers. They did a good job of keeping JJ
 in check. Be an interesting rematch when they go to Buckeye land. I kind
 of missed the play that lead up to Ayers taking the technical. Seemed key
 as OSU had just taken a slight lead....

 mike
15.127ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 01 1991 15:214
    
    OSU did not play well at all.  They could not seem to get things going
    in the second half.  They also seemed to be in a panic early... like
    down 8 with 8 minutes to go, and they were in a panic.
15.128GO BADGERS!!CHIEFF::CHILDSI'm a victim of SADORISISFri Feb 01 1991 16:2511
 Could be that they weren't ready for the physicaliness of MSU. Which leads
 one to suspect that although Perry is carved up suprememely he isn't mentally
 into the banging. 

 One thing for sure it proves the guys who gave them those #1 votes have Rocks
 in their heads.

 Arkansas vs. UNLV coming soon!!!!!!!!!!!!

 mike
15.129ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Fri Feb 01 1991 17:586
    
    Mike, one loss does not mean the team is not one of the top teams in
    the land.  Remember, Arkansas has 1 loss, and UNLV hasn't exactly
    played a tough schedule...  When UNLV loses to the Razorbacks, #1 will
    be up for grabs.
    
15.130CHIEFF::CHILDSI'm a victim of SADORISISFri Feb 01 1991 18:539
 Paul, I wasn't implying that they weren't one of the top teams just that
 they certainly aren't #1. I like OSU, I was touting em last year especially
 JJ. Arkansas has the personal and the game plan to beat UNLV but Ollie
 Miller has to stay out of foul trouble. If he doesn't play the Razorbacks
 will not be able to physically match UNLV in the box. 

 mike    

15.131Dirty anti-Bob myth-lie debunked by fact !!ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 04 1991 13:2834
The only reprehensible act of any substance by Bob was his allegedly having
taken his team off the floor against the Russians.  Turns out, he didn't. 
Also turns out that, as usual, the press took liberties with the facks in the
incident, so much so that what started as just plain fake reporting became
self-perpetuating myth:	

	The entire litany was revived at the opening of the 1987-88 season
	in the widely-reported "Russian incident."  Unanimously, reporters
	wrote that in protest against the officiating Knight took his team 
	off the floor.  Yet this is not what happened at all.  After Knight
	had protested against leaving, referee Jim Burr had raced over to
	the scorer's table and written that the game was forfeited before 
	anyone realized what was happening.  Only then did Knight and his 
	team leave.  

	Weeks later, reporters, with the exception of Dick Vitale on ABC
	television, still had Knight removing his team from the floor as if
	it had been a matter of his choice, his decision.  As in the case
	of Puerto Rico, the original error was perpetuated in the press: 
	Knight petulantly had led his team off the court.  "Grow up," wrote
	Harvey Araton in the New York Daily News, adding, "punch a cop in 
	San Juan, if you must, throw a few chairs, but do get us into the
	Final Four."  Even Andy Rooney of Sixty Minutes had his say via the 
	Tribune Media Services: "Knight decided, on the spot, to take his
	team off the floor and forfeit the game."

	There is a profound difference between a team leaving the floor 
	after a forfeit and taking your team off thefloor and by so doing
	forfeiting the game...  Acknowledging (that the rules hadn't been
    	adhered to in the Russian game) the Amateur Basketball Association
	apologized "for inconsistencies in the official's enforcement of
	the the Russian's coach's box, substitution and free throw lane
	rules," an apology which never made the newspapers.
15.132ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 04 1991 13:5671
    >One thing for sure it proves the guys who gave them those #1 votes
    >have Rocks in their heads.
    
    I don't think that's for sure at all.  Remember, while the Bucks are
    going into Breslin and Assembly Hall etc. the Runnin' Rabble are off
    munching on cupcakes like San Jose State.  The Rabble are a_excellent
    team (btw, what do you think Augmon and Larry got for staying this
    year, $250,000 each?), but playing in a pud league tends to magnify
    them in comparison to the other excellent teams, who put it on the line
    week in week out [yes, I remember the game in Detroit].
    
    The call on which Ayers took the T was indeed unbelievable.  But he
    gave the other team a 7 point trip down the court, and it killed them.
    I think the key thing hurting the Bucks was that Jamaal Brown and JJ
    shot poorly, but give the D credit on this.
    
    Steigenga is hard to understand.  I dunno if he's slow-witted, but I've
    rarely seen so much talent so poorly used.  And you cain't fault Jud,
    Steigenga simply insists on making stupid passes, stupid fouls (he fouled
    out on 5 stupid, unnecessary fouls, 4 of which came after he'd already
    put the shooter in a position where he was throwing up a prayer, only to
    be sent to the line for free-throws), and stupid shot selection.  He's
    constantly out of position on offense, on defense, and in transition.
    The guy seemingly hasn't learned a thing in 3 years.  But he'll still be
    an NBA draft pick, and a good one.
    
    Btw, a buddy of mine went out for post-game drinks with Ayers and his
    entourage, and when axed about Funderburke Ayers said that he had a 
    "very very rough upbringing" and was indeed a haid case and that he had
    no idea whether he'd stick at OSU, but he's a great player and probably
    learned his lesson in Bloomington, and represents a huge bluebird for
    the OSU program cuz all top Ohio players (both hoops and grid) by long-
    standing tradition go to Michigan for some reason.
    
    I was at the Indiana-Gopher game, which the Hoosiers won by 12 or so.
    This is no #4 team, going down to the young, not-so-good, Gophers by
    13 several times in the first half.  They were unable to make a move
    until they reverted to the 3-guard lineup with Anderson in the middle.
    After that they inlet passed constantly to Anderson who'd go up, get
    fouled, and go to the stripe.  He won't be able to do that against a
    good team (and wasn't against OSU and SyrExcuse).  
    
    Gregg Graham also suffered a reversion, going back to his old ways
    making at least 10 errors on offense, 3 of which cost sure baskets in
    the first half that resulted in Indiana falling far behind.  Little
    Chris Reynolds did an unbelievable job of D on Kevin Lynch, shutting
    him down.  Lynch, showing his typical lack of class, cried during the
    post-game about being double-teamed all the time cuz he's on a team 
    short of scorers.  Odd thing is, except for the usual weak-side help
    outs, Lynch was never doubled by Indiana.  
    
    The Hoosiers fell behind in the first half largely cuz they played 
    NO inside game at all when Nover was in.  Nover's abject inability to
    receive inlet passes was partially responsible for this, but more than
    that was that Indiana contented themselves to take open midrange Js
    that they consistently missed.  IU finally grabbed the lead with 11
    minutes left in the game, kept it around 5 points going into the last
    few minutes, and then stretched it out at the foul line at the end. 
    
    The 3-guard offense gives the Hoosiers much better D, and until they
    went to it they were unable to get the motion offense going cuz Nover
    was getting eaten alive by Ernest Nsigamasabo, Minnesota's 4.0
    engineering student Watusi who just learned how to play hoops 3 years
    ago as a_exchange student.  I got skeert when Clem countered the
    3-guard lineup with 3 straight successful mismatch lay-ins against 
    much smaller Hoosier defenders.  But gradually Indiana motioned the
    poor Goofers to death until their defense fell apart and they ended
    up in big-time fould trouble, whereupon the Hoosiers surgically took
    control over the contest.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.133dam Illini beat the Badgers too...anyone got a weekend roundup?CNTROL::CHILDSI'm a victim of SADORISISMon Feb 04 1991 14:1011
 Well maybe "rocks" was too a strong a statement but I do feel that not
 only is UNLV better so is Arkansas. The Buckeyes sure looked impressive
 yesterday in the last five minutes against Gene's boy. Larry certainly
 could have taken a few lesson from JJ yesterday don't you think Doug?

 I remember the play now that Ayers got the T. The big boy Robinson stepped
 in perfectly to a charge on a 2-1 break that MSU was dealing up and got
 called for blocking....

 mike
15.134Fortunately, the tourney renders this a *disadvantage*!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 04 1991 14:468
    Course you'd think Vegas & the Hogs are better.  They don't play
    anybody and rack up huge numbers as a direct result!
    
    If you put Arkansas in the ACC, Big East, or Big 10, I'll guarantee
    they'd end up with at least 5 losses.  (Maybe more ...)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.135ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 04 1991 14:504
    UNLV'd wouldn't go undefeated in the ACC or Big East, although
    they might in the down Big10 this year, but I doubt even that.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.136Wait til ACC tourney, I'll probably OD on Kenny ASACT41::ROSSOpen for suggestionsMon Feb 04 1991 16:1713
>Larry certainly could have taken a few lesson from JJ yesterday don't you
>think Doug?

Unfortunately, Mike, I now live in the SOUTH.  Where the only hoops allowed 
on TV must involve the ACC.   That's right, Purdue Vs Ohio State was not shown
locally in Columbia, SC.   We got the distinct pleasure of seeing Ga Tech vs
NC State.  That would be fine most days, but since we had seen GA Tech vs
Duke on Wednesday, and Wake Forest vs Clemson, and UNC vs Clemson and god knows
how many other ACC games last week, it's getting a little old.   It's
unbelievable how many games they show.... and how much network stuff they'll
preempt to do it.

Tell me, what did JJ do?  :-(    And how bad were the Purdue guards?
15.137Debunking yet more dirty anti-Bob lies...ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 04 1991 16:2431
    
    From falsehood to distortion, the media vultures are ever-anxious to
    feast on poor Bob's carcass, seeking in this case to promote an 
    otherwise unremarkable documentary by sensationalizing a_innocent
    reference, a_intellectual literary reference, indeed a highbrowed 
    quote to his pantheon-mate Voltaire, into a_alleged enorsement of
    the act of rape:	
    
    	On April 25, Connie Chung's documentary, "Stressed To Kill,"
    	aire on NBC  Barely a moment into Bob Knight's segment, almost 
    	his first words are "If rape is inevitable, relax and enjoy it."
     	It's as if the subject of the program were sexuality in the 80s,
    	with a basketball coach a peculiarly unlikely commentator.  
    	Completely gone is the context in which the coach made the remark:
    	Knight himself immobilized by unjust officiating, rendered as
        helpless as a rape victim, attempting to perceive what it might 
    	feel like to be completely and hopelessly vulnerable.
     
    	Recognizing that the figure of speech, no matter its origins in
    	Voltaire's Candide, might be understood, Knight goes on immediately
    	to qualify: That's just an old term that you're going to use.  The 
    	plane's down, so you have no control over it.  God, I'm not talking
    	about the act of rape, don't misinterpret me there.  But what I'm
    	talking about is something's happened to you so you have to handle
    	it.  You have to be able to realize that there's nothing you can do
    	about it."
    
    	The wire services alter the text, adding an emphatic "now!" after
        "so you have to handle it," whereas the "now" came later, after 
        "nothing you can do about it, now..." as the transition to Knight's
        next thought."
15.138ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 04 1991 16:2812
    Oh quit you're poor-mouthing, Doug.  You've gotten so bad with it you
    now embarrass even ME with this threadbare technique of yours!  Tellya
    what, I'll trade you Matt Nover, Chris Lawson, and throw in Pat Graham
    if you'll just let me have this Riley stud.  Whatta main, and he really
    knows how to play.  Package a_NBA-bound pivotmain like him with this
    Oliver, who makes Anderson and Cheany look like non-athletes, and what
    we have is a subpar coaching job being runed in by Mene Gene.
    
    Btw, up here in the midwest it's the same, we get a slate of nonstop
    ACC games, with maybe 1 or 2 Big10 clashes thrown in if we're lucky.
    
    Big10 Tom                                                           
15.139Having to forfeit is probably just as bad ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 04 1991 16:369
    re: .131
    
    So tell us then, exactly *why* was the game ruled a forfeit?
    
    I'd also be curious as to your source for all this sudden insight. 
    Seems strange that it took you so long to find out "the truth".
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.140CNTROL::CHILDSin my Muntumo, Muntumo MambaMon Feb 04 1991 17:1215
 Chris just because their respective conference aren't top notch doesn't 
 mean that the Hogs and the Rebs aren't. Both have the offensive and more
 importantly defensive talent to be atop any one of the major conference.
 While they certainly wouldn't be undefeated I say 5 losses is a possibilty
 but it would probably be less...

 Well Doug unfortunely I only saw the last five minutes when I tuned in it was
 53-51 OSU. Purdue tied it then OSU turned up the defense and forced a few
 bad passes as well as scoring on all their chances. JJ hit 4 or 5 shots down
 the stretch all from different places on the court a few assists, rebounds etc.
 They certainly looked top notch crunch time but some of the pass by the purdue
 guards were dumb...

 mike
15.141AXIS::ROBICHAUDHome E. CheeseMon Feb 04 1991 19:094
15.142Did Bob whisper a new commandment in his disciples' earS?NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 04 1991 20:099
15.143the TRUE story...ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Feb 05 1991 14:4626
    >So tell us then, exactly *why* was the game ruled a forfeit?
    
    It was ruled a forfeit cuz Bob, ironically enough, REFUSED to leave
    the floor after receiving his 2nd technical.  The rules had been
    set aside on several occasions (the Russians had 6 guys on the floor
    with the ball in play twice, for example, with no technicals called;
    the Russian coach was out of the coach's box most of the game, again
    no Ts, etc.), and Bob went crazy when *his* 3rd technical was called
    for being out of the coach's box - after he'd been complaining the 
    entire game about the Russian coach!
    
    Anyway, Bob refused to leave, instead staying with Bill Wall, then
    Prez of the AAU (?), trying to work a compromise where the rules were
    either enforced or not enforced equably.  After only about 15 seconds
    of ignoring the referee and speaking with Wall the ref ran over to the
    bench and declared the game forfeited and over.  Only then did Bob and
    his team leave the floor (in fack AFTER the Russians had left).
    
    Not coincidentally, the officiating crew was the same one filed against
    by Dale Brown the previous tourney over the phone-slamming incident; a
    scene that purportedly cost the crew a Final Four appearance.
    
    Funny how things get twisted into exact opposite LIES where sensationalism
    cain be generated.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.144ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Feb 05 1991 14:5410
    >I haven't hardly even heard any mention of Bob since the Thanksgiving
    >fun.  What gives?
    
    Wail, after the ACCrook/Dan axis suffered abject defeat on the Bob vs.
    Snuffy Smif' issue (in no small part due to your fine work) it's much 
    less necessary to anlayze things Bob.  I've always been one a Bob's 
    biggest (truthful) critics in here, so I don't want to publicly beat my 
    own devil, so to speak.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.145Big Ten last ThurFORTSC::MOKWed Feb 06 1991 06:4977
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-1-91)  NCAA
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 1991 19:16:50 GMT
 
Michigan State reduced the ranks of the unbeaten by one, while
Iowa ended it's 15-game Big Ten road losing streak at reeling Purdue,
and the Wolverines pulled a surprise at The Barn...
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#41 MICHIGAN STATE 75, #2 Ohio State 61:  I knew they could do it.
	Remember last year, when a 5-3 Michigan State team visited an 8-0
	Purdue team and came away with an 11-point victory which propelled
	them to a 15-3 league title?  Will that happen again?  It will be
	tougher, since there is a second team up at the top this year
	(Indiana).  But, this was a tremendous performance by a team with
	it's back to the wall, coming off it's worst loss in years.  MSU was
	5-3 going into the game, Ohio State 7-0 and undefeated overall.
	What may have been the key to the game occurred during the final
	minute of the first half when MSU, down 36-32, got a hoop and then a
	technical foul call on OSU coach Randy Ayers.  The Spartans tied the
	game up after the T and then someone named Kris Weshinskey nailed a
	trey to give State a 39-36 halftime advantage.  The Spartans then
	built upon that lead in the second half.  Ayers said, "My technical
	was the biggest play of the game".  Part of the Breslin Center
	sellout of 15,000+ ran out on the floor after the momentus win...
 
#59 Iowa 78, #35 PURDUE 69:  Purdue's slide into oblivion continued,
	as the Hawkeyes hammered them in the final ten minutes of the game
	before the quietest Mackey Arena sellout I've heard in some time.
	In recent games, Purdue has gotten behind early 16-4 (IU), 20-9
	(MSU), and 28-8 (at Wisconsin).  Earlier, Cal had them down 19-8 and
	Stetson had that 43-21 halftime lead.  Last night, Iowa led 18-7.  I
	wonder what Keady tells the team before the games?  But, as usual,
	Purdue came all the way back to lead, this time with a 15-1 run.
	The Boilers led 29-23 with about 6 minutes left in the first half
	when Iowa took over again, outscoring Purdue 19-12 to take a slim
	42-41 lead to the lockerroom.  Iowa, which shot a miserable 33% at
	Illinois Monday, blistered the nets at a 62% rate in this half.  The
	first 10 minutes of the second half were a low-scoring see-saw.  A
	Linc Darner trey put Purdue up 52-50, and then the game changed for
	good.  Twice, Purdue forced Iowa turnovers only to blow fast break
	attempts (the crowd was really going at this point) and blow a
	chance to take a decent lead.  Iowa then seized on this chance and
	transformed this two-point deficit into a 62-53 lead which
	essentially decided the game.  Unfortunately for Purdue, Chuckie
	White had severely sprained his ankle during the final seconds of
	the first half and didn't play any of the second half until he
	pleaded his case with the coach and entered the game at this point.
	He did his best, helping to cut the lead to just 72-68 within the
	final two minutes.  But, two Val Barnes hoops extended the lead to
	76-68 to finally ice it.  Acie Earl enjoyed a huge size advantage
	inside and had a big game.  Purdue has now lost 7 of it's last 11
	games (10 of these since the Woody Austin news came out)...  It
	doesn't get any better, what with a national TV date at Ohio State
	coming up...  The Hawkeyes ended up shooting 55% for the game, and
	were 21 of 30 from the stripe after being only 3 of 12 at
	Illinois...  Keady termed his team as "not very good" in his
	postgame interview, citing "we're back where we were 11 years ago
	when I came here" (actually, that team was much better!)...
 
#69 Michigan 66, #54 MINNESOTA 62:  In somewhat of a surprise (at
	least to me), the Wolverines pretty much had their way at
	Minneapolis last night.  Minnesota's season seems to be paralleling
	Purdue's at this stage - losing, and no offense.  The Wolverines led
	by six at the break and built a 12-point second half lead before
	blowing it, when the Gophers took a 62-59 lead with just 2:29 left.
	That's when Demetrius Calip took over.  He hit a trey with 1:36 left
	to tie the game at 62.  Then, after a Kevin Lynch baseline miss with
	just over a minute to go, Calip nailed the game-winning trey with 24
	seconds to go.  Both Lynch and Nate Tubbs missed subsequent
	three-point attempts, and Michael Talley finished off the scoring
	with a free throw.  Michigan has won 9 of the last 11 and 13 of the
	last 16 meetings between these two schools.  After not playing all
	that much last year (except when Sean Higgins was hurt), Calip has
	become one of the stars of the conference this season...
 
15.146Sat and SunFORTSC::MOKWed Feb 06 1991 06:50122
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-4-91)  NCAA
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 1991 21:08:46 GMT
 
Saturday's Results:
 
#60 ILLINOIS 70, #48 Wisconsin 62:  The Illini hung on again as
	their opponent again was ice cold from the stripe.  Wisconsin could
	only manage 8 of 18 from the charity line, and added to Iowa's last
	Monday, makes it 11 of 30 against Illinois.  Must be that two-headed
	cow they have behind the basket...  This game may have been decided
	during the final 2:30 of the first half, when Illinois turned a
	23-20 deficit into a 27-24 halftime lead and never trailed again,
	though it did get close.  The Illini were down by as much as 21-15
	in the first half before taking the lead at the end of the half.  In
	the second half, they built leads of 47-38 with 11:52 to go and
	58-48 a few minutes later.  But, the Badgers came back, and with the
	help of an Andy Kaufmann T, trimmed 5 points off of the lead
	quickly at 58-53.  The Illini answered with three points off of a
	steal to lead 61-53 with just 5:42 to go.  But, Wisconsin outscored
	Illinois 9-4 over the next 4+ minutes to whittle the lead to 65-62.
	They had some chances, most notably a missed Larry Hisle trey, but
	Illinois hit 5 free throws inside the final minute to win.  Both
	Kaufmann and Larry Smith had 16 points for Illinois.  Pat Tompkins
	was a bear for the Badgers, scoring a game-high 17 points and
	pulling down 8 boards.  The largest attendance of the year, 16,295,
	was on hand...
 
#59 IOWA 82, #228 Northwestern 66:  This score is not indicative of
	the game, as the Hawkeyes stormed out to a 43-18 halftime advantage
	after leading 32-10.  This was Northwestern's 41st consecutive Big
	Ten road loss, the last win coming at Minnesota, of all places, on
	February 20, 1986 (65-60).  Iowa's biggest lead was 57-29 with 14:28
	to play, and the Hawkeyes just coasted home thereafter.  Acie Earl
	led the Hawkeyes with 19 points and 6 blocked shots.  Rodell Davis
	had 11 points.  The Wildcats were led by Pat Baldwin with 16.  Since
	coming to Northwestern, Bill Foster is 8-72 in league play and 0-40
	on the road!  15,500, as usual, at Iowa City...
 
 
Sunday's Results:
 
#2 OHIO STATE 66, #35 Purdue 59:  Amazingly, Purdue was able to throw
	a big-time scare at the Buckeyes and their fans before Jim Jackson
	settled things down the stretch.  There were times in the first half
	of this game that Purdue didn't even belong on the same floor as the
	Buckeyes.  OSU did pull away from a slim 8-7 lead to go up 23-14,
	but that's as large as the lead ever got until the final score.
	From 23-14, Purdue outscored the Buckeyes 14-9 to cut the lead to
	32-28 inside of the final minute of the first half.  But, aided by a
	couple of turnovers, the Buckeyes were able to go up 36-28 at the
	break.  Purdue came out fast in the second half, outscoring the
	Buckeyes 13-4 to open the half and take a 41-40 lead.  The two teams
	then played evenly until the 8:00 mark, when Purdue still led at
	51-48.  It was at this point that Mr. Jackson took the game over, as
	he consistently penetrated for easy J's.  The Buckeyes took the lead
	over inside the 4 minute mark, and held on as Purdue could only must
	8 points down the stretch.  During the final 6 minutes, OSU
	outscored Purdue 15-6.  Jackson had 8 points in the final 4 minutes,
	and finished with 22.  Jimmy Oliver also had 22 for Purdue as he
	broke his slump.  Chuckie White also had a big game for Purdue, as a
	couple of his jams really got his team going.  Linc Darner hit a
	couple of big treys.  Purdue became the first team to outrebound OSU
	this year, 26-23.  13,276 nervous fans in Columbus...
 
#4 Indiana 77, #54 MINNESOTA 66:  The Hoosiers overcame 30% shooting
	and a 13-point deficit in the first half to come back and whip the
	Gophers.  A 17-1 run by the Hoosiers, keyed by Calbert Cheaney and
	Eric Anderson, turned the tables on Minnesota and the Hoosiers
	gradually salted the game away.  The win avenged a huge loss the
	Hoosiers suffered at The Barn last year on Super Bowl Sunday.  Both
	Cheaney and Anderson had 22 points, and Kevin Lynch's 20 put him
	15th on the all-time Gopher scoring list.  No more details on this
	one, as they chose not to show it locally, but a near-capacity crowd
	on hand in Minneapolis to see the Gopher slide continue...
 
 
Tonight:
 
	#228 Northwestern at #60 ILLINOIS		8:30 pm CST    ESPN
 
Wednesday:
 
	#60  Illinois at #35 PURDUE				7:00 pm
 
Thursday:
 
	#4   Indiana at #228 NORTHWESTERN		7:00 pm
	#59  Iowa at #41 MICHIGAN STATE			7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#41  Michigan State at #48 WISCONSIN	Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#228 Northwestern at #2 OHIO STATE		2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#59  Iowa at #69 MICHIGAN				7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#35  Purdue at #4 INDIANA				1:00 pm  ABC (National)
	#60  Illinois at #54 MINNESOTA			3:00 pm  ABC (Regional)
 
Monday:
 
	#69  Michigan at #2 OHIO STATE			8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    2      3    Ohio State        18-1     8-1
    4      4    Indiana           20-2     8-1
   41     34    Michigan State    13-6     6-3
   60     NR    Illinois          15-6     5-3
   59     40    Iowa              15-6     4-5
   48     NR    Wisconsin         10-9     4-5
   35     NR    Purdue            11-8     3-6
   54     NR    Minnesota         10-9     3-6
   69     NR    Michigan          10-9     3-6
  228     NR    Northwestern       5-13    0-8

15.147Ohio State clinches Big10 TitleCARP::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewWed Feb 06 1991 15:5510
    Well, the Bucks have pretty much wrapped up the Big10 Crown, given 
    that the undersized Hoosiers must visit both St. John and Breslin
    whereas the boys in Red & Silver have already been to Breslin and
    Bloomington.  
    
    Congrat's to the Buckeyes on winning the only meaningful conference
    Crown in the nation.  
    
    Sadly,
    Big10 Tom 
15.148Are you sure?ROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Wed Feb 06 1991 16:2516
    
    Gee Tom, Thanks!
    
    	I really haven't seen too much of them this year except for Sundays
    game and to be honest with you, I hope they have looked better.  I
    don't think I would say things are wrapped up yet though....I think
    they still have to play Indiana one more time this year.  Its hard for
    me to understand why Indiana can still be ranked above Ohio State in
    the National rankings with the Big "O" beating them once this year
    allready.  
    	I'll be looking for Ohio State to be in the final 4 this year and
    be top seeded.  Unlike last year where they had to play UNLV in the
    early rounds.......when is the reagular season over for them?
    
    	Hal
    
15.149ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Wed Feb 06 1991 17:294
    
    Hal, look at the national rankings... you'll find that OSU is ranked
    higher than IU and have been since the victory...
    
15.150Monday resultFORTSC::MOKWed Feb 06 1991 21:0263
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-6-91)  NCAA
Date: 6 Feb 91 18:18:02 GMT

[....]
 
Monday's Result:
 
#60 ILLINOIS 73, #224 Northwestern 59:  This was a fairly easy,
	though not embarassingly easy win for Illinois, as Northwestern does
	play hard (it must be tough to get up for each impending loss).  The
	Illini led 38-24 at halftime after the Cats had sort of made a game
	of it early, though they were down 30-13 at one point after a 20-3
	Illinois streak.  Illinois then extended the lead to 60-39 before
	the walk-ons entered the game.  Northwestern, either leading the
	country in free throw shooting or in the top couple, again was 20 of
	26 for 77%, the one bright spot on the team.  The Illini dominated
	the boards 39-26.  Deon Thomas led the way with 22 points, while
	6'11" Kevin Rankin had 19 for Bill Foster & Co.  12,068 on hand...
 
 
Tonight:
 
	#62  Illinois at #40 PURDUE             7:00 pm CST
 
Thursday:
 
	#4   Indiana at #224 NORTHWESTERN       7:00 pm
	#45  Iowa at #25 MICHIGAN STATE         7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#25  Michigan State at #50 WISCONSIN    Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#224 Northwestern at #3 OHIO STATE      2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#45  Iowa at #60 MICHIGAN               7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#40  Purdue at #4 INDIANA               1:00 pm  ABC (National)
	#62  Illinois at #68 MINNESOTA          3:00 pm  ABC (Regional)
 
Monday:
 
	#60  Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE          8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    3      3    Ohio State        18-1     8-1
    4      4    Indiana           20-2     8-1
   62     35    Illinois          16-6     6-3
   25     25    Michigan State    13-6     6-3
   45     48    Iowa              15-6     4-5
   50     NR    Wisconsin         10-9     4-5
   40     NR    Purdue            11-8     3-6
   68     NR    Minnesota         10-9     3-6
   60     46    Michigan          10-9     3-6  Give me a break, AP!
  224     NR    Northwestern       5-14    0-9

15.151ITASCA::SHAUGHNESSYTearyEyedYellowRibbonSobNationThu Feb 07 1991 16:3622
    Wail, looks like my preseason prediction that Illinois would be at
    the top of the bottom of the heap is coming true.  The Illini's big
    road win in Mackey serves notice that they cain challenge State and
    maybe even Indiana for 2nd place this year - especially if Kaufmann
    gets untracked, what with Deon and all.
    
    The thing to remember about Indiana is that they haven't made a 
    really tough road trip yet, with these visits remaining:
    
    St. John
    Breslin
    Assembly Hall - Illinois
    Crisler
    Mad City
    
    This list leaves the Hoosiers the most likely to drop off during the
    second half of the schedule.  The question is, willy they collapse and
    end up behind State or maybe even Illinois or Wisconsin.  They showed
    some class against Iowa and Minnesota on the road, but the 5 toughest
    road games all remain.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.152Illinois beats PurdueFORTSC::MOKThu Feb 07 1991 18:5974
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-7-91)  NCAA
Date: 7 Feb 91 16:54:43 GMT
 
Wednesday's Trainwreck:
 
	#62  Illinois 59, #40 PURDUE 56:  I'll spare you the details of this
	game, mostly because I can't bear to think about them again and also
	because the game was an instant replay of every other Purdue
	loss this year (except Wisconsin):  Purdue trails the first ten
	minutes of the game as the offense is non-existent, then puts on a
	spurt to close out the first half with a modest lead (36-28, was
	36-26 with 3 minutes left in the half), then comes out flat as a
	pancake in the second half, scoring 20 measley points, missing all
	but one free throw, but not relinquishing the lead until the horrid
	final 3+ minutes when neither team could hit a free throw.  Illinois
	did it's best to play the gracious visitor, committing two
	ridiculous turnovers in the final 30 seconds, with the score 59-56,
	but then gladly taking the victory after Purdue missed every three
	point attempt it took, including 5 in the final 12 seconds.  Jimmy
	Oliver was the only Boilermaker who looked of Big Ten caliber.
	Chuckie White had one of his worst games in a Purdue uniform,
	fouling out with 6 points and a couple of boards.  Deon Thomas had a
	nice second half for Illinois, as did Larry Smith.  This game was
	a typical foul-marred Big Ten tilt.  14,123 disgruntled fans at
	Mackey Arena saw history - the first Purdue team to ever lose 5
	games in one season in Mackey's 23-year history.  The loss was also
	it's fourth straight and sixth out of it's last 7, the worst such
	period since a 7 out of 8 streak two years ago.  Keady had his
	tersest post-game show ever.  Illinois has now won 5 straight,
	somehow...  I'll disagree with the recent post-er who thought this
	was a "great game".  It was terribly played on both sides,
	foul-marred, and like having your teeth pulled as you watched.
	A quick flip to the UNC-NC State game revealed a different caliber
	of basketball, frankly...
 
 
Tonight:
 
	#4   Indiana at #224 NORTHWESTERN       7:00 pm
	#45  Iowa at #25 MICHIGAN STATE         7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#25  Michigan State at #50 WISCONSIN    Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#224 Northwestern at #3 OHIO STATE      2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#45  Iowa at #60 MICHIGAN               7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#40  Purdue at #4 INDIANA               1:00 pm  ABC (National)
	#62  Illinois at #68 MINNESOTA          3:00 pm  ABC (Regional)
 
Monday:
 
	#60  Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE          8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    3      3    Ohio State        18-1     8-1
    4      4    Indiana           20-2     8-1
   62     35    Illinois          17-6     7-3
   25     25    Michigan State    13-6     6-3
   45     48    Iowa              15-6     4-5
   50     NR    Wisconsin         10-9     4-5
   68     NR    Minnesota         10-9     3-6
   60     46    Michigan          10-9     3-6
   40     NR    Purdue            11-9     3-7
  224     NR    Northwestern       5-14    0-9
15.153QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Thu Feb 07 1991 19:1510
15.154AXIS::ROBICHAUDIndustrial Strength NoterThu Feb 07 1991 19:205
    	I think some pinhead at the National rates every one of 'em
    Mike JN.  Imagine deciding who should be #200 and who should be
    #201?  GET A LIFE!
    
    				/Don
15.155CARP::SHAUGHNESSYTearyEyedYellowRibbonSobNationFri Feb 08 1991 12:4111
    With State being dropped at home by the inconsistent but dangerous
    Hawkeyes the Illini are well positioned to take 3rd, even conceivably
    2nd, place in the Big10.  Should that happen then we're looking at a
    probable max of three teams in the tournament - although I'd like to
    see Wisconsin sneak in along with State, IU, and the Bucks.
    
    What IS it with Peplowski?  His knee's not bothering him anymore, but
    he flip-flops from being the best middlemain in the league to a non-
    entity (last nite: 2 points).
    
    Big10 Tom
15.156FORTSC::MOKFri Feb 08 1991 17:147
    Mike, I crosspost the "reports" from usenet and they were written by a
    guy Peppler in Illinois.  The # ranking is I think the Sagarin power
    ratings.  Sagarin I think lists all division I programs, every single
    one of them.
    
    Charles
    
15.157Thursday resultsFORTSC::MOKFri Feb 08 1991 17:1568
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-8-91)  NCAA
Date: 8 Feb 91 16:15:53 GMT
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#4  Indiana 105, #224 NORTHWESTERN 74:  Northwestern definitely
	gave IU a run for it in the first half, but the Hoosiers steamrolled
	the Cats in the second half.  NU actually led on several occasions,
	with the largest lead at 25-19 midway through the half.  The
	Hoosiers tied the score up at 27, but the Cats took a couple of more
	small leads before the Hoosiers tied it for the last time at 33.  IU
	then outscored the Cats 10-2 to end the first half and lead 43-35.
	The Hoosiers then opened the second half with an 18-11 run to lead
	61-46, and then coasted home.  The second half was 62-39 IU!
	Calbert Cheaney led the Hoosiers with 21, while Eric Anderson
	chipped in 16 points.  Five Hoosiers reached double figures.  Four
	Wildcats reached double digits.  The Hoosiers had a very good
	shooting and rebounding second half.  A sellout of 8,117 at
	Welsh-Ryan...
 
#45 Iowa 71, #25 MICHIGAN STATE 67:  Unfortunately, I have very
	little detail on this one, but Iowa handed the Spartans just their
	second loss ever on the Breslin Center court.  After losing
	15-straight Big Ten road tilts, the Hawkeyes have now won two
	straight at two of the tougher places to win at.  Iowa led 29-28 at
	the break, and led by Acie Earl's strong scoring and inside play,
	were able to win this one at the end.  A very disappointed sellout
	crowd in East Lansing.  Jim Szabo, the Iowa radio announcer, was
	practically beserk during the post-game show.  He and James Moses
	had a great chat.  The Hawkeyes have never won at both MSU and
	Michigan in the same year, but now get the chance to do that
	Saturday at Ann Arbor.  I'll try to add a bit about this very
	interesting game in Monday's report...
 
 
Saturday:
 
	#25  Michigan State at #50 WISCONSIN    Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#224 Northwestern at #3 OHIO STATE      2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#45  Iowa at #60 MICHIGAN               7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#40  Purdue at #4 INDIANA               1:00 pm  ABC (National)
	#62  Illinois at #68 MINNESOTA          3:00 pm  ABC (Regional)
 
Monday:
 
	#60  Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE          8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    4      4    Indiana           21-2     9-1
    3      3    Ohio State        18-1     8-1
   62     35    Illinois          17-6     7-3
   25     25    Michigan State    13-7     6-4
   45     48    Iowa              16-6     5-5
   50     NR    Wisconsin         10-9     4-5
   68     NR    Minnesota         10-9     3-6
   60     46    Michigan          10-9     3-6
   40     NR    Purdue            11-9     3-7
  224     NR    Northwestern       5-15    0-10
15.158Jay EdwardsFORTSC::MOKMon Feb 11 1991 14:5854
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (JIM SLATER, UPI Sports Writer)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.basketball
Subject: Ex-Hoosier Edwards has no regrets
Date: 10 Feb 91 20:13:30 GMT
 
	BLOOMINGTON, Ind. (UPI) -- Jay Edwards returned to Assembly Hall on
Sunday, having made peace with his troubled past while looking toward
his NBA future.
	Edwards departed the Hoosiers for the NBA in 1989 after his sophomore
season, ending a college career marred by academic suspension and drug
rehabilitation. Had Edwards stayed in school, he would have been a
senior on the fourth-ranked Indiana team he saw play arch-rival Purdue
Sunday.
	The forward who earned Big Ten Freshman of the Year honors and was
named a UPI All-America as a sophomore admitted having second thoughts
about leaving the Hoosiers early.
	``I think about it a lot,'' Edwards said. ``The decision was made and
I have to stick with it. I have thoughts both ways. I can't regret it. I
have to live with it.''
	Edwards was selected by the Los Angeles Clippers in the NBA draft,
but saw little playing time before failing a rookie drug test. He was
reinstated last month but is on the injured list after spending the past
10 months rehabilitating injured knee ligaments. Edwards is expected to
rejoin the active roster when the Clippers play San Antonio Feb. 22.
	``I just need the chance to get in and show what I can do,'' Edwards
said. ``I'll get that chance. I just had to do a lot of growing up. I
learned a lot in the past two years. I did all the growing up watching
other people play while I had personal problems and injuries.''
	Edwards spoke with Indiana Coach Bob Knight during a three-day campus
visit that lifted his spirits.
	``I sat down a couple of days ago,'' Edwards said. ``We had a nice
talk. I told him where I was at. It feels good to come back and be
accepted.''
	Edwards blames himself for drug use, citing his reaction to the star
treatment he received since leading Marion High to three straight
Indiana state prep titles.
	``It wasn't peer pressure,'' Edwards said. ``Anything I did is
because I wanted to do it. I had a lot of opportunities as a player. I
took advantage of them. Everything came so easy to me all the way
through high school.''
	Edwards misses having Indiana senior Lyndon Jones as a teammate.
Jones was benched much of the past two seasons, but has returned to lead
a young Indiana squad. Until Edwards departed, he and Jones were
teammates since grade school.
	``I talk to Lyndon on the phone at least once a week -- good times and
bad,'' Edwards said. ``I try to help him out with that and he's helped
me. We've been friends since I was 5. He's survived a lot, being on the
bench. (My departure) has affected us both. He knows how I play and I
can take the pressure off him. He has players now who can do that.''
	Knight dropped Edwards from the Indiana team after his freshman year
for poor grades. Edwards worked his way back onto the squad over the
summer despite undergoing drug rehabilitation. Edwards quit school after
his second season after alleged threats and an incident involving
charges he slapped a female student.
15.159on their way to the NCAA'sAGNT99::CHILDSTango &amp; Cash, George BushMon Feb 11 1991 16:5010
 Any details on the Badgers beating of MSU would be greatly appreciated.


 Also for those of you in the New England area who get pissed off at ABC
 for not carrying the Big ten clashes oposite  NBC and CBS's games, channel
 27 WHLL out Worcester carries them. This sunday's the rematch of IU/OSU
 should decide the conference...

 mike
15.160FORTSC::MOKMon Feb 11 1991 21:1812
    Re: Boston's ABC station not showing ABC Sunday college games: I have
    complained about it for a long time.  Now that I am in the SF Bay Area
    both the SF and San Jose ABC affiliates do show those games, in favor
    of Boston favorite "Star Search" featuring favorite son Ed McMahon. 
    Sure when there is a Pac-10 game in an ABC regional broadcast they will
    show that instead of the Big Ten game, but like yesterday at least the
    Purdue-IU game was shown though the Illinois-Minnesota game was not. 
    Still beats my trying to catch the Worcester broadcast in Boston, which
    is usually "have sound, no picture."
    
    Charles
    
15.161Big Ten last weekendFORTSC::MOKMon Feb 11 1991 21:18147
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-11-91)  NCAA
Date: 11 Feb 91 19:07:40 GMT
 
Saturday's Results:
 
#50 WISCONSIN 84, #25 Michigan State 78 (2OT):  It took two
	overtimes, but Wisconsin finally managed to win one of these home
	cliffhangers which they so often blow.  The key play of the second
	OT and game was an airball by Jay Peters, which Pat Tompkins grabbed
	and layed back (and was fouled).  His three points gave the Badgers
	a 78-74 lead which it would not give up.  At times, the extra
	sessions looked like Steve Smith highlight films, but he just
	couldn't do it all.  Wisconsin committed a couple of boneheaded
	turnovers at the end of regulation which allowed State to tie it and
	nearly win it.  Larry Hisle missed two more FTs near the end of
	regulation which could have won it, but atoned with some clutch
	shooting during the overtimes.  The score was only 58-all at the end
	of regulation and 64-all at the end of the first OT.  Tompkins led
	the Badgers with 22 points, while John Ellenson had 14 and Hisle and
	Tim Locum each had 13.  Smith had 28 for State and Matt Steigenga 20
	in one of his better showings.  Wisconsin nailed 8 treys and
	outscored the Spartans by 11 from the line.  11,501 in Madison...
 
#3  OHIO STATE 96, #224 Northwestern 64:  The Cats hung tough for a
	half, but the Buckeyes blew them out in the second half.
	Nevertheless, it amounted to NU's 43rd straight Big Ten road loss.
	The Buckeyes just had six days off since beating Purdue, and it
	showed early, as they looked a bit rusty.  The halftime lead was
	only 44-32, but was widened quickly in a 52-32 second half.  The
	Buckeyes had 26 assists and pounded the Cats on the boards 38-19.
	Jim Jackson scored 26 points and Perry Carter 16.  Todd Leslie had
	19 for Northwestern, before 13,276...
 
#60 MICHIGAN 84, #45 Iowa 70:  Iowa didn't get it's much-coveted
	Michigan sweep, as the Wolverines whipped them in Ann Arbor.  The
	Wolverines continue to impress, as they've now beaten the Hawkeyes
	ten straight times in Crisler Arena.  The Wolverines had their way
	most of the game, leading 41-29 at the break and by as much as 66-49
	in the second frame.  Michael Talley led the way with 21 points,
	while Chris Street and Jay Webb each had 15 for Dr. Tom Davis.
	Michigan managed to do a good job keeping Iowa off of the boards,
	which others haven't done very well lately.  The teams combined to
	make only 5 of 20 three point shots.  12,644 at Crisler...
 
 
Sunday's Results:
 
#4  INDIANA 81, #40 Purdue 63:  Like Wisconsin recently, Purdue
	managed not to get routed at the Assembly Hall, but the outcome
	never really seemed in doubt, either.  The game looked to be a
	yawner at the beginning, with the Hoosiers racing out to a 10-0 lead
	before Gene Keady had seen enough.  Purdue cut the margin to 10-5,
	but over the next 10 minutes the Hoosiers built a 28-13 lead.  The
	Boilers then managed to cut the lead to five at 28-23 on 5 of 7
	shooting.  IU then scored the next 7 to lead 35-23, and led 41-27 at
	the break.  Purdue had a pretty good opening 7 minutes of the second
	half, cutting the lead to 6 at one point (46-40), and still only
	trailed by 7 a couple of minutes later at 50-43.  But, the Hoosiers
	then regained a 10-12 point lead and kept that until the very end,
	when registering their largest lead with the final margin.  Jamaal
	Meeks had 10 points during the game's critical second half stretch
	when IU widened the slim six-point lead.  Purdue made 12 turnovers
	in the first half, many of them very early.  Travis Trice, who a few
	games ago looked pretty good, can't even dribble a basketball at the
	moment.  Jimmy Oliver got a little more help this time, as Chuckie
	White matched him with 17 points.  IU's Calbert Cheaney had 18 to
	lead all point-getters.  Damon Bailey had 13 after going scoreless
	the first time these two friendly foes met, and Pat Graham had 10.
	IU only outscored Purdue by two from the floor, but cashed in at the
	line, making 32 of 39.  Purdue outrebounded the Hoosiers 37 to 33
	and hit 7 treys, but still only shot 38% for the game.  Keady got
	the obligatory Assembly Hall technical.  Cheaney became only the
	fifth IU soph to eclipse the 1,000 point mark.  The loss was
	Purdue's 5th straight and 7th out of 8.  But, as Jim Valvano said,
	"they are probably playing the best they can, given what they've
	got."  17,283 fans saw IU get the measure of Purdue this sports
	season, with the coveted "trifecta"...
 
 
#62 Illinois 94, #68 MINNESOTA 74:  The Illini finally won AND
	played well while doing it.  In fact, they were sensational,
	dominating the Gophers beginning with the final five minutes of the
	first half.  The Illini hit over 50% from the field for the first
	time since mid-December against Mizzou, and hit an incredible 33
	of 37 free throws, as the Gophers continued to hack the opposition.
	The Gophers did play well early, and led by six with just 5:28 left
	in the first half.  That's when Illinois, led by Rennie Clemons,
	went on a 17-1 tear which saw them blister the nets on fast breaks
	while the Gophers were throwing up clunkers from short-range on the
	other end.  The Illini led 47-35 at the break, but the Gophers
	closed to 49-45 early in the second half.  That comeback ended
	quickly as the Illini scored 13 consecutive markers to lead 62-45,
	and the closest Minnesota could get thereafter was 8 points.  I
	think the final margin was the largest lead.  Illinois ruled the
	boards 46-36.  Andy Kaufmann scored 28 points, Larry Smith 25 and
	Deon Thomas 19.  Clemons only had 9, but most of those got the team
	going with the lead.  Kevin Lynch had 28 for Minnesota.  The Gophers
	were only 3 of 16 from beyond the arc.  Just a couple of short weeks
	ago the Gophers let one get away in Champaign, but these two teams
	have headed in opposite directions since.  16,305 at Williams Arena
	saw the Gophers lose yet another home game and the Illini win their
	6th straight...
 
 
Tonight:
 
	#60  Michigan at #3 OHIO STATE             8:30 pm  CST ESPN
 
Thursday:
 
	#25  Michigan State at #224 NORTHWESTERN   7:00 pm
	#3   Ohio State at #50 WISCONSIN           7:00 pm
	#68  Minnesota at #45 IOWA                 8:30 pm  ESPN
 
Saturday:
 
	#62  Illinois at #25 MICHIGAN STATE        Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#68  Minnesota at #40 PURDUE               2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#60  Michigan at #224 NORTHWESTERN         7:00 pm
	#50  Wisconsin at #45 IOWA                 7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#4   Indiana at #3 OHIO STATE              1:00 pm  ABC (Regional)
 
Next Monday:
 
	#40  Purdue at #60 MICHIGAN                8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    4      4    Indiana           22-2    10-1
    3      3    Ohio State        19-1     9-1
   62     35    Illinois          18-6     8-3
   25     25    Michigan State    13-8     6-5
   50     NR    Wisconsin         11-9     5-5
   45     48    Iowa              16-7     5-6
   60     46    Michigan          11-9     4-6
   68     NR    Minnesota         10-10    3-7
   40     NR    Purdue            11-10    3-8
  224     NR    Northwestern       5-16    0-11
15.162REFINE::ASHEWhatever happened to Haystacks Calhoun?Tue Feb 12 1991 21:084
    I thought some channel like 27 picks it up... some UHF station.  It's
    in the 30's on my cable box.
    
    _Walt
15.163Monday's gameFORTSC::MOKTue Feb 12 1991 23:3767
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-12-91)  NCAA
Date: 12 Feb 91 21:13:59 GMT
 
Monday's Results:
 
	#3 OHIO STATE 81, #60 Michigan 65:  A really good ballgame to watch,
	as Michigan had just enough athletic talent (except Eric Riley, who
	may be a bigger stiff thatn you-know-who) to make this game
	interesting.  The Wolverines caught the Buckeyes cold early, jumping
	out to a 7-2 lead.  But, Ohio State ripped ahead after the first TV
	timeout 16-9, and had a nine-point lead until the Wolverines drilled
	a J to end the first half, with the score 36-29 Buckeyes.  At times
	Ohio State threatened to blow the Wolverines out in the second half,
	but either Demetrius Calip or Michael Talley would drill a couple of
	threes to keep it interesting.  Ohio State's front line of Treg Lee
	and Perry Carter totally dominated the Michigan interior people, and
	the press forced Michigan into countless turnovers.  Chris Jent
	showed everyone why he is "Mr. Hustle".  Jim Jackson also had a
	field day driving into the paint.  Ohio State did not get much from
	it's guards, though, and Dick Vitale thought they were thinking
	ahead to Indiana on Sunday.  They better not be, as they have a date
	in Madison on Thursday, which could be very interesting.  It's too
	bad ESPN isn't showing that.  Talley had a great scoring game but
	also committed a bunch of turnovers.  Lee and Carter had a couple of
	prolific dunks which moved Dick to scream his famous "MONSTER MASH"
	line.  13,276 fans in St. John's getting ready for Sunday...
 
 
Thursday:
 
	#25  Michigan State at #224 NORTHWESTERN   7:00 pm
	#3   Ohio State at #50 WISCONSIN           7:00 pm
	#68  Minnesota at #45 IOWA                 8:30 pm  ESPN
 
Saturday:
 
	#62  Illinois at #25 MICHIGAN STATE        Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#68  Minnesota at #40 PURDUE               2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#60  Michigan at #224 NORTHWESTERN         7:00 pm
	#50  Wisconsin at #45 IOWA                 7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#4   Indiana at #3 OHIO STATE              1:00 pm  ABC (Regional)
 
Next Monday:
 
	#40  Purdue at #60 MICHIGAN                8:30 pm  ESPN
 
 
RECORDS:
         New
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    3      2    Ohio State        20-1    10-1
    4      4    Indiana           22-2    10-1
   62     26    Illinois          18-6     8-3
   25     42    Michigan State    13-8     6-5
   50     NR    Wisconsin         11-9     5-5
   45     44    Iowa              16-7     5-6
   60     NR    Michigan          11-10    4-7
   68     NR    Minnesota         10-10    3-7
   40     NR    Purdue            11-10    3-8
  224     NR    Northwestern       5-16    0-11
15.164ACC > B10, according to MidWesterner Montross. :^)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 15 1991 14:4918
    [Excerpt from recent Eric Montross interview by Carolina Blue]
    
    Carolina Blue:	"Eric, has playing in the ACC been all that you 
    			 expected it to be?"
    
    Montross:		"I think it's been more than I expected.  I knew
    			 what the Big 10 was like, and I had been to the 
    			 (N.C.) State game here before I committed, but I
    			 hadn't experienced it firsthand.  I had always
    			 heard that the Big 10 was the craziest and the
    			 loudest and all of that, but I think they should
    	 		 all wake up and realize that the ACC is even more
    			 so.  I think you can't really compare the 
    			 experience of going to Virginia and playing at
    			 Duke to some other games."
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.165Were Dean's lips moving when he said it?MAXWEL::CHILDSNaw Saw's the guy that beats up EvanFri Feb 15 1991 15:5910
 Who cares what he thinks about crowd noise? What does he think about the
 play? Does he think it's less physical than the Big Ten, Big East (as I do}?
 The ACC to me seems to be a quards/small forward league whilst the Big Ten
 and Big East are the domain of the Wide Bodies/Physical players.

 Also again it's from Caroline Blew(tm) so it should be taken with a grain
 of salt...

 
15.166What do you think he's gonna say to 'Carolina Blue'?NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 15 1991 16:046
    Apparently the experience was just soooo great that Montross left his 
    game back in the Midwest...
    
    glenn
    
15.167Uh, over here, Eric ...SHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Fri Feb 15 1991 16:056
15.168Eric putting together a solid year - will only improve.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 15 1991 16:079
    Montross' game is just fine, thank you, and it's gonna get a whole lot
    better as time goes on.  
    
    I dunnot know if Eric thinks the ACC is better than the Big Least or
    Bigot 1X but, based on his choice of school, I could make some purty
    good guesses!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.169MAXWEL::CHILDSNaw Saw's the guy that beats up EvanFri Feb 15 1991 16:559
 and my guess would be that he's wuss and went where there were no physical
 players to beat him up. With Christian Lattiner as the premire big man in
 the conference you do lack a physical presence in the post. Lattiner's got
 a great game but physicaliness isn't one of it's attributes...

 of course you think Eric's game is fine, you thing Dean's a great coach...

 nuff said
15.170Thursday resultsFORTSC::MOKFri Feb 15 1991 17:5482
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-15-91)  NCAA
Date: 15 Feb 91 16:26:52 GMT
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#32 Michigan State 55, #223 NORTHWESTERN 53:  This was
	Northwestern's best attempt at Big Ten victory, as the Wildcats led
	until 1:25 was left in the game, and the Spartans limped out of
	Evanston fortunate to win.  The Wildcats had leads of 19-12 and
	23-15 in the first half before settling on a 28-21 advantage at the
	break.  The lead was expanded to as many as 10 points in the second
	half before the Spartans mounted their comeback, and took their
	first lead at the 1:25 mark, 51-49.  The Wildcats missed a very long
	three attempt at the final horn after each team traded four points,
	and Bill Foster took out his frustration on a chair.  Parish Hickman
	was the only Spartan in double figures with 15 points, as Steve
	Smith was held to a season-low 8 points.  Kevin Rankin led a
	balanced NU attack with 19 points.  6,002 at Welsh-Ryan...
 
#4  Ohio State 73, #49 WISCONSIN 71:  Wisconsin overcame a 12-point
	halftime deficit and some larger early second half ones to almost
	knock-off the Buckeyes.  During one stretch in the first half the
	Buckeyes ran off 20-straight points, and led 41-29 at the break.
	They still led 51-37 several minutes into the second half when the
	Badgers ripped off a 24-9 streak and took a 61-60 lead with 5:37 to
	go.  Ohio State regained a 64-61 lead with 3:06 left, and the game
	was closely contested the rest of the way.  The Badgers trailed
	71-68 when Louis Ely hit a short shot and ensuing free throw with
	:35 left to tie the score at 71.  Then, the Buckeyes held the ball
	until the :11 mark, called a timeout, and finally Mark Baker hit a
	twisting J in the paint to win it as the clock expired.  Jim Jackson
	led Ohio State with 21 points, while sharpshooter Tim Locum had 23
	for the Badgers.  A great comeback for Wisconsin, and a huge win for
	Ohio State ahead of Sunday's date with Indiana.  10,525 at The
	Fieldhouse...
 
#47 IOWA 82, #79 Minnesota 69:  The Hawkeyes pretty much had their
	way with the Gophers after about the first 10-15 minutes of the
	game.  Iowa got off to a very slow start, scoring only 5 points in
	the first 8 minutes of the game, but then got it going and took an
	8-point halftime lead.  Leads in the second half dwindled to as
	little as 5 early, but then were as large as 15.  Minnesota was
	hitting it's threes late, so they managed to stay withing striking
	distance.  However, the Gopher inside game was practically
	non-existent again, and Iowa was able to wear them down.  No other
	details on this game, except the Iowa crowd seemed awfully quiet,
	and Wayne Larivee, the ESPN announcer, referred to Bruce Pearl
	as a "fine coach" (that's for you Illinois fans!).  Probably the
	usual 15,500 at Carver-Hawkeye...
  
Saturday:
 
	#38  Illinois at #32 MICHIGAN STATE        Noon CST Big Ten/Raycom
	#79  Minnesota at #48 PURDUE               2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#52  Michigan at #223 NORTHWESTERN         7:00 pm
	#49  Wisconsin at #47 IOWA                 7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#2   Indiana at #4 OHIO STATE              1:00 pm  ABC (Regional)
 
Monday:
 
	#48  Purdue at #52 MICHIGAN                8:30 pm  ESPN
  
RECORDS:
 
Sagarin   AP    School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ------          -------  -------
 
    4      2    Ohio State        21-1    11-1
    2      4    Indiana           22-2    10-1
   38     26T   Illinois          18-6     8-3
   32     42    Michigan State    14-8     7-5
   47     44    Iowa              17-7     6-6
   49     NR    Wisconsin         11-10    5-6
   52     NR    Michigan          11-10    4-7
   48     NR    Purdue            11-10    3-8
   79     NR    Minnesota         10-11    3-8
  223     NR    Northwestern       5-17    0-12
15.171Montross doesn't strike me as the wuss type Mike ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 15 1991 17:5715
    If Eric has a physical weakness it's quickness.  If he were a "wuss"
    the last place he'd wanna show up is the ACC, where quick big men are
    plentiful.  (Laettner, Davis, Mackey, Rogers, Gugliotta, etc.)  Eric
    can bang with *anybody*.  Just ask Shack, who confessed recently his
    toughest defensive opponent to date was Montross over the summer in
    those north/south games.
    
    No, Eric's no dummy (SAT scores upward of 1300).  He took a look at
    Dean's 10/17 success ratio in turning big men into high-salaried
    professional hoopsters (should be 11/18 - Chilcutt looks like NBA
    material to me) and realized his earnings potential was best served by
    signing up with Coach Smith.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.172Another frozen rope smacked down the lineSHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Fri Feb 15 1991 18:0313
15.173Hanging changup smacked outa the park.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 15 1991 18:377
    Big diff Ketch.  Namely, Eric also intends to get a degree out of the
    process.
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.174RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsFri Feb 15 1991 18:4711
    Chris,
    
    How *do* you know Eric intends to get a degree?? How do you know the
    dove didn't??  Face it Chris, the *only* reason this is an issue is
    because it happened in the Big East, and not the ACC.  And it happened
    with, *gasp*, foreigners.  
    
    If Eric, or any other *American* really intends to get an education
    first, then they should get their degree *beforee* going into the pros.
    
    JD
15.1757221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Feb 15 1991 18:5725
    In my not-so-humble opinion, most of the young men who play major
    college football and basketball are hired guns, are brainwashed into
    thinking they're going to make the pros, see no reason to study and
    will try to skate by as much as they possibly can.  If you look at the
    percentage of those who finish 4 years of eligibility the graduation
    percentage as a whole is pretty low (though I will admit some schools,
    among them North Carolina in hoops, are better than others).
    
    To suggest that big-time football and basketball has anything
    whatsoever to do with the educational process is not only incorrect,
    but a complete hypocrisy.  It's no more wrong for a foreign student to
    come here and use the system for all it's worth than it is for an
    American to do the same thing.  After all, the system will use that
    person and the person will find it's his own responsibility to make
    sure he gets the education he's playing for.
    
    To me it makes no difference whether a student is a native born
    American, a foreigner or an alien from another planet.  If that person
    is qualified to play a particular sport, let him play it under the same
    eligibility rules as any American citizen.
    
    American, Land of Opportunity.
    
    John
    
15.176let he who is without sin...HBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughFri Feb 15 1991 18:593
Let's not forget that foreign hired gun for the Tar Heels, "Hank" Rodl.

TTom
15.177Let me try one more time ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 15 1991 19:1421
    Only diff TTom is Henrik fully intends on getting his diploma.
    
    Forget about The Dove and Marco for a sec and consider the case of
    Andrew Gaze, who helped SHU reach the Final 2 a couple_a years ago.  He
    has openly admitted that he came over here for one reason:  to play
    basektball.  Once hoops season was over he packed his bags and headed
    home - forget about completing the semester!  That's a Hired Gun,
    folks.  It gave SHU a competitive advantage (going out and bringing in
    a season pro like Gaze) and it goes against everything that has to do
    with the student/athlete concept.  (Yes folks, some of us still believe
    in that archaic concept.)
    
    This kind of thing is wrong.  Flat out wrong.  And for those of you who
    can't see the difference between Andrew Gaze and Henrik Rodl or Eric
    Montross, I can only sadly shake my haid and say (in true Mike Childs
    fashion) "You STOOPID!"
    
    (Many ;^)'s after that last crack!)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.178Eric Montross: Disappointment & Failure Under SmiffMUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 15 1991 19:2916
    Bob, you could go on to also say that Montross, after only a few
    months under 'Snuffy, is beginning to walk, talk, and sound like
    a *duck*.
    
    People in Hoosierland, who know their hoops, are deeply disappointed
    in what's happening to poor Montross.  It was his and Bob's tough
    luck about the unfortunate contretemps between the Pantheon-dweller
    and Eric's old man shyster (when Eric was only a tyke of 10 or so)
    that stemmed from Bob's unflinching committment to his players and
    to his personal Bob-ethics, that robbed poor Eric of the opportunity
    to learn from the Master and forced him to go to a choke-aholic like
    Smif'.  
    
    Cruel fate knows no mercy.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.179what did he say?HBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughFri Feb 15 1991 19:3811
>    Forget about The Dove and Marco for a sec ...

All fine and good, Chris, but you broght it up with regard to Marco.  By
the time Bob Hunt is finished with you and your "looks like" you'll wish
we'd all forget about everything you've said.

Besides, I know the difference between Gaze and Rodl: Gaze is from
Australia and is a better basketball player. Where Montross fits into the
ratings remains to be seen.

TTom
15.180RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsFri Feb 15 1991 19:4514
    Gaze was under pressure from his father to return to Oz and compete on
    his hoop team, which floundered without him.  
    
    And Chris, when you get a scholarship from a college, they don't, at
    least from what I know, ever ask you 'Do you intend to finish all 4
    years and get a degree'.   They want to make sure you'll arrive in good
    shape, you'll go to class and get acceptable grades, and help the team
    - and if not, you're gone, unless you're a star like King Rice.
    
    Funny, Chris, Andrew Gaze and this gosh darn foreigners are horrible
    for college hoops cause they may be hired guns, yet King Rice, who's a
    hired gun who beats up women, are otay in yours and Dean's eyes.  
    
    JD
15.181DECWET::METZGERJohn-man,johnster,johnerino,the j-man...Fri Feb 15 1991 19:4519
I agree with Crisp in that bringing in a foreigner whose only intention is to
play basketball is wrong. Andrew Gaze being the best example.

However....how is one to know that the foreign student being brought in has
no intention of attempting to study? You don't. Therefore you can't ban the
schools from bringing these guys in because you might be discriminating against
the guy whose intention is to come to the states, play some hoop and get a 
degree also.

Did Manute Bol ever graduate from bridgeport? Did Henfield really never intend
to finish up school or was he pressured into changing his mind? Unless the 
admittance board can read minds I don't think you should pass any rules stating
when a foreign player can or can not be brought to a school under scholarship.

that's my HO,


 Metz
15.182Metz raises valid point. (1st point to do so besides me!)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 15 1991 19:5014
    Correct Metz, there's a difficult if not impossible problem in
    proving that they're_a Hired Gun.  Doesn't mean it doesn't happen, and
    doesn't mean it's right.
    
    As to Montross being a failure MorT, I think it's a tad premature for
    that label.  His numbers right now are solid albiet unspectacular, but
    he's shown flashes of being *dominant*.
    
    (Course, when that happens, we'll all here 'bout his boatloads of
    talent, but just remember, B10Bigot Doug Ross himself labeled the kid
    'journeyman', based on his astute scouting observations.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.183So why UNC ???SHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Fri Feb 15 1991 19:5527
 Okay, Soup, maybe he intends to get his degree.  Fine.
 
 So why North Carolina then ???  Indiana and Michigan both offer comparable
 undergraduate degree progams, don't they ???  
 
 So why The University of North Carolina then ???  In your own words,
 Chris, because Snuffy has put 10 out of 17 big men into the NBA and Eric
 figured out that was a pretty good ratio.
 
 North Carolina ain't the *ONLY* school in the entire freakin' Milky Way
 galaxy to offer undergraduate degree programs, Chris.
 
 By your logic, Eric Montross came to North Carolina and thus did not go to
 another school for the singular purpose of getting himself better prepared
 to play professional basketball.
 
 And *THAT* is the same thing you dinged Henefeld at Connecticut and Gaze
 and Lokar at Seton Hall for yesterday and today.   That's the exact same
 criteria you used to call these three players "hired guns".   You were
 advised to drop it early in yesterday's debate but you kept at it ...
 
 You can't have your soup and sip it, too, Soup.
 
 Bob Hunt
 
 P.S. Obviously, Montross ignored Dean's other ratio.  You know, that 1 out
 of 30 one.
15.184MUSKIE::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 15 1991 20:1232
    Crisp, don't brandish the ridiculous spectre of Doug Ross' hoops 
    "expertise" in my face and expect anything but crossed eyes and one
    very loudy stinking fart.  (Doug routinely communicates to me via
    mail seeking my consultancy on college roundball.)
    
    >His numbers right now are solid albiet [sic] unspectacular,
    
    As for Eric, let's just leave it that the word "disappointment" is
    being used in his case and that's that.  He's shown flashes mainly of
    being both poorly used and poorly taught and on the low road to the
    middle of Nowhere.
    
    As for Andrew Gaze, let's not forgeth the tens of thousands of dollars
    deposited into a trust fund in Andy's name by investors in his dad's
    pro team, with the idea being that the dough would serve as a retainer
    for his continued services after his return from one year of quality
    training in big-time American college hoops.
    
    But many foreign students are true students.  Uwe Blab, for one, graduated
    with top honors in math or comp sci or somesuch.  Or this Watusi kid from
    Burundi at Minnesota right now, he's skeering his teammates cuz he's taking
    Phsyics as a_*elective*.  If anything these foreign students are better
    prepared to compete as real students cuz they don't come from America's
    sad-sack educational system.
    
    In fack, I just wish that Bob would start recruiting internationally. He
    already ties a hand behind his broad muscular back by recruiting only in
    the immediate area (IN, IL, OH, & sometimes MI) and not nationally, and
    with IU's famous Languages Institute it'd be perfect!  Recruit tall Germans
    Bob!!
    
    Big10 Tom
15.185Talkin' outta both sides againSHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Fri Feb 15 1991 20:3121
15.186SACT41::ROSSPrepared food, prepared dude!Mon Feb 18 1991 10:139
What a game yesterday.  Ohio State beat Indiana 97-95 in double OT.  Jimmy
Jackson was immense yesterday, hitting the shot to send it into the first OT
and making the pass to Treg Lee to set up the winning hoop.   Damon Bailey
was fantastic as well for the Hoosiers scoring a career best {short career}
32 points and taking charge after Calbert Cheaney fouled out.  Bailey did miss
a FT near the end of regulation that would have given the Hoosiers a 3 point
lead, but he also hit some big shots and handled the ball very well.   At 
some point, MrT is going to have to pull the old switcheroo and start calling
for Damon's HOF induction.
15.187Was not to be...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Feb 18 1991 11:5512
               
    I didn't get to see all of this one (I wish I had), only the
    overtimes.  Indiana did just about everything possible to give it away
    at the end of the first overtime.  With a four-point lead, they seemed
    to let down on defense, forced a bad shot with plenty of time left on 
    the shot clock in their next-to-last possession, didn't take a time out
    and got off only an off-balance heave on the last possession.  Most 
    unlike a Bob Knight-coached team, after having seemingly pulled off the 
    upset on the road with their best player on the bench...
    
    glenn
     
15.188CNTROL::CHILDSNaw Saw's the guy that beats up EvanMon Feb 18 1991 12:1713
 Definately one of the best college games I've seen all year. Neither team
 could get more than a 4 point lead at any time. I could have watched a 
 dozen overtimes in this one. While IU did loose Calbert, OSU overcame the
 loss of their pointman Baker. Of course this is where JJ showed his versitily
 moving to point forward and controling the game for OSU. As Doug said Damon
 lived up to his advanced billing. OSU as Dicky was pointing out didn't use
 Carter enough as IU had no real answers defensively for him.

 I like Vitale on ABC he tones down his act alot and doesn't feel like he has
 to talk from start to finish without loosing his enthusiasium...

 mike
15.189More ...SHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Mon Feb 18 1991 12:3915
 Damon Bailey comes of age.   A monster game.
    
 I thought it was a riot listening to Keith Jackson do the play-by-play. 
 Boy, did he sound uncomfortable away from the football field.  I was
 expecting him to yell "FUMBLE" whenever a loose ball rolled by.  Lots of
 his trademark expressions like "Oh, my goodness" and "Oh, baby".  It was
 just way too much excitement for him with critical plays every 30 seconds
 or so.
    
 And is there anyone out there who does not yet know that the initials "P"
 and "T" when placed together mean "Playing Time" ???   Vitale insists on
 over-explaining what he thinks are his little nuances.   "Jent is getting
 the PT (playing time), baby, that's where it counts, baby."
    
 Bob Hunt
15.190Great game yesterday - congrats to OSU.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 18 1991 13:3321
    re: Montross
    
    I pick up my paper Saturday and see stats as follows:
    
    		FGA-FGM		FTA-FTM		PTS
    
    R Rogers	 4 - 6		 1 - 4		 9
    G. Hill	 2 - 4     	 0 - 0		 4
    Montross     4 - 4  	 1 - 1		 9
    
    Eric won't be rookie-of-the-year, but he's playing *solid* basketball.
    Keep in mind he's playing behind a guy who'll probably be in the NBA.
    (Chilcutt)
    
    Eric's not even getting close to the minutes of other freshmen in 
    the league or the country.  Eric knew this coming in.  Dean's had
    the luxury of bringing him along slowly and is taking advantage of
    it.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.191One more time, with feelingRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 18 1991 14:3939
> By your logic, Eric Montross came to North Carolina and thus did not go to
> another school for the singular purpose of getting himself better prepared
> to play professional basketball.
 
> And *THAT* is the same thing you dinged Henefeld at Connecticut and Gaze
> and Lokar at Seton Hall for yesterday and today.   That's the exact same
> criteria you used to call these three players "hired guns".   You were
> advised to drop it early in yesterday's debate but you kept at it ...
 
You seem to be having a little problem with this concept Ketch, so have
a swig of java, put yer thinkin' cap on, sit back, and read carefully
whilst I try one more time ...

Eric Montross came to North Carolina (by his own admission) for TWO
reasons:

1. To get his degree.  (pre-law)
2. To give him the best possible shot of earning the big bucks in the pros

There's two reasons there.  TWO.  2.  T-W-O.  DOS.  II.

He chose North Carolina over other schools because of the basketball angle,
but that in no way eliminates the fact that he wanted to get his degree.  To
take it a step further to prove the point, the kid wanted to major in 
pre-law.  Not every school woulda sufficed in that category.  North Carolina
fit the bill on BOTH counts.

I've dinged Gaze and The Dove and Locar because they couldn't care about
#1, only #2.  Do you think any of these kids cared about what kinda majors
SHU or UConn offered?  I think not.  I *know* Gaze couldn't care.  He 
was a classic Hired Gun.  The fact that Locar followed in his footsteps
to the same school gives credence to my 'Looks like_a, Acts Like_a, 
Sounds Like_a, ... Probably is' theory.

HTH,


- ACC Chris
    
15.192CARP::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Feb 18 1991 14:4346
    re 1
    
    Just what is this "solid" basketball you keep harping about, Crisp?
    Solid like a cigar store Indian... as in STIFF?
    
    re The Game
    
    Classic game, but when it came crunch time the Hoosiers couldn't answer
    the bell, having blown not one, not two, not... you get the idea, they
    had several chances to win the thing and they never closed.  Granted, the
    Bucks played relentless D, but no more so at the end than at the tipoff.
    Here's how the Hoosiers blew the game (in approximate sequence):
    
    - Damon missing 2 foul shots (2-4) in the last minute of regulation which
      directly cost the win.
    
    - Calbert's *unbelievably* sloppy display of dribbing which allowed the
      other teams center to steal the ball at midcourt.  With 20 seconds to
      go all they had to do at that point was dribble the game out.
    
    - The referee's gutless inability to then call Perry for carrying the
      ball a la Barry Sanders atop his shoulder for two full steps on his way 
      to the slam-jam.
    
    - In the first OT, Gregg Graham failing to see Damon wide open underneath
      for several seconds as the final seconds of the first OT ticked away,
      thus missing a sure lay-in for the win.
    
    - In the second OT, Indiana's abject inability to stop Ohio State from
      grabbing offensive rebounds allowing them extra shots four straight 
      trips down the floor.  The centerless Hoosiers were outrebounded by at
      least 15 on the game.
    
    - Both clutch plays by JJ occured on called plays where he took the ball
      on the right side and dribbled straight down the paint.  On the first
      one, his bucket, Indiana had only the hapless Matt Nover to take him on
      with predictable results.  On the second, his dump off, Indiana was 
      forced to double team - a practice the Hoosiers rarely engage in but 
      were forced to revert to for lack of a widebody in the middle.
    
    The good news: Damon Bailey finally arrived as a player.  True, he choked
    at the line and cost his team a win, but he found his range from outside
    at long last. 
    
    Big10 Tom
    
15.193TruthCARP::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Feb 18 1991 14:5015
    >He chose North Carolina over other schools for the basketball angle...
    
    Eric Montross publicly expressed a desire to play for home state hero
    Bob, but underwent extreme pressure from his father who publicly stated
    that he'd do anything to stop him from playing for Knight, after Bob
    publicly humiliated Eric Sr. into returning tens of thousands of dollars
    to the disabled ex-Hoosier player Landon Turner when Eric Sr. tried to
    take a full 50% of Turner's court damages awared as his lawyer in a lawsuit
    against an automaker.
    
    After that, it became a choice between Michigan (Eric Sr.'s alma mater)
    and the field.  That being so, it cain thus be said that Dean Smith edged
    out Steve Fisher in the recruiting battle for Eric Jr.'s services.
    
    Big10 Tom                                                         
15.194SACT41::ROSSPrepared food, prepared dude!Mon Feb 18 1991 14:5616
Chris,

Who has developed more basketball-wise this season - Damon Bailey or Eric
Montross?   What one factor is responsible for that happening?   Do you think
Montross would be in the same stage of development/production had he gone to
IU?

True or False:

	    Eric Montross was overrated by all of the experts last year who
	    rated him the top big man in the senior class.   He should not 
	    have been expected to contribute anything beyond limited minutes
	    and coincidental offense to the Tar Heels.   He should not have 
	    been held up to the high standards usually expected of the top
            freshman big man in the country {like the Mourning's, Ewing's,
	    O'Neal's, Laettner's, etc.}  
15.195OSU, OSU, OSU, OSUROULET::WHITEHAIRDon't just sit there.......Do it now!Mon Feb 18 1991 14:567
    
    	Yesterdays game was the best I've seen Ohio State play in their
    last several attempts.  I would have liked to of seen them play more
    full court though.  I think they got the last second basket down pat
    right now.  
    
    	Hal
15.196Bottom line: He's wearing 00 for Carolina. :^) :^)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 18 1991 14:578
    Listening to MrT's whining about no big man during his game analysis,
    then explaining how one of the best big men in Indiana HS 
    history got away is truly music to my ears!
    
    Haw haw haw!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111111
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.197Bad comparison, but great timing Mr. Ross!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 18 1991 15:0617
    Everybody knows that it's tougher for big men to adjust to the
    college game than the little guys.  But I do find it funny that you'd
    offer this comparison after Damon's best game (by far).  If he'd had
    his usual 8 points or so would you be so forthcoming? [no]
    
    As to your phony question, it all boils down to unrealistic expectations
    placed on 17 or 18 year olds by the media.  Kids who haven't even made
    a single collegiate hoop are hailed as the next Walton, West, or Russell. 
    
    It's ridiculous, but it sells.  (Only thing that matters, media-wise.)
    The logical mind would have to say it's much more meaningful to judge a
    coach based on the delta between when a player entered school and when he
    left.  Toward this end I'd offer 2nd tier HS talents Rick Fox
    and Pete Chilcutt as evidence of Dean's tutelage.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.198CARP::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Feb 18 1991 15:0914
    Montross would definitely be playing much better right now if he 
    were with Indiana.  He looks the same now as he did last year with
    Lawrence Central.  Especially shocking is that he's still allowed
    to play that shuffling high school footwork, playing with his legs
    too close together, standing to straight, with his arms too far from
    his body.  Eric's lack of technical improvement positively screams
    out for some coaching.  Like any big main, he needs to be taught to
    keep his center of gravity under better control.  Flailing around 
    like a goose flapping his wings don't cut it.  He has no natural moves
    and therefore must be taught them.  Question, of all these big men 
    supposedly in the NBA cuz a 'Snuffy's genius, were any a them white
    guys?
    
    Big10 Tom
15.199RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 18 1991 15:126
    Joe Wolf
    Mitch Kupchak
    Tommy LeGarde
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.200tutelage = ensilageHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughMon Feb 18 1991 15:1314
>    The logical mind would have to say it's much more meaningful to judge a
>    coach based on the delta between when a player entered school and when he
>    left.  Toward this end I'd offer 2nd tier HS talents Rick Fox
>    and Pete Chilcutt as evidence of Dean's tutelage.

And where does that leave King "1st tier" Rice?

Actually, one of the culprits in the hype has to be the Baby Blue
Propoganda Machine, who continue to write about the greatest recruiting
class in the history of college basketball. And for those who notice this
type of thing, they'll still be ranting and raving about Dean after he
fails to win *IT* with this gang.

TTom
15.201Media Perception <> RealityRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 18 1991 15:158
    Fine.  Throw in King Rice.  He's having an excellent senior year and
    has progressed drastically since his freshman year.
    
    (BTW, the delta I'm talking about is how good the player *really* is
     when he enters college, not how long his press clippings are.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.202Not Knight's best coaching job yesterdayHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe elbow is part of the ballMon Feb 18 1991 15:1526
    >- The referee's gutless inability to then call Perry for carrying the
    >  ball a la Barry Sanders atop his shoulder for two full steps on his way 
    >  to the slam-jam.
    
    I don't think guts had anything to do with it.  The ref called the foul
    on Chaney before Perry took his steps.  He never went in for the
    slam-jam, but stepped to the line and sank the crucial two freebies.
    
    Chaney was rightfully disgusted with himself.  He has no business
    exposing the ball like that.
    
    With all the strength the Hoosiers have at guard, particularly
    Reynolds, I'm surprised Knight didn't pressure the ball a lot more once
    OSU lost their point man.  Jackson was dog tired at the end of the
    game, and with more pressure this could have made a difference.
    
    Speaking of their lack of a big man, what happened to top 50 recruit
    Lawson?  Hasn't Knight developed the kid in two years, and given him
    those famous "extra points" on defense?
    
    JJ locked up big 10 player of the year yesterday, didn't he.  At the
    end of regulation, I was surprised to see him step into the back court
    with 10 seconds left to receive the inbounds pass.  Turned out to be
    excellent strategy considering the Hoosiers almost never picked him up.
    
    Dan
15.203Soup invents history once againSHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Mon Feb 18 1991 15:2323
15.204In Search of ExcellenceSACT41::ROSSPrepared food, prepared dude!Mon Feb 18 1991 16:055
>    Joe Wolf
>    Mitch Kupchak
>    Tommy LeGarde

Eric Montross --- "The Tom LeGarde of the 90's"  --- has a nice ring to it.
15.205Eric shoulda redshirtedSACT41::ROSSWolf,Kupchak,LeGarde,MontrossMon Feb 18 1991 16:1717
>But I do find it funny that you'd
>    offer this comparison after Damon's best game (by far). 

Wait a sec... weren't you the one who posted Montross' big 9 point game as
compared to Grant Hill and Rodney Rogers 4 and 9 point games as some sort
of indicator of Eric's progress?   Didn't you just do that today???

> If he'd had
> his usual 8 points or so would you be so forthcoming? [no]

Wrong again... Damon's averaging 12.? right now and is probably averaging close
to 16-18 in the Big 10 games.   He's led the team in scoring a couple times in
the past few weeks, scoring 21 and 19.   After a slow start, Knight has seen
the on-court skills are too  good to leave on the bench.  The playing time
Bailey gets just brings him along faster.   Tell me the Montross would not be
better off  playing 30 minutes a game in the Big 10...  And he wouldn't be 
an afterthought on the offensive end like he is now.   
15.206CARP::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Feb 18 1991 17:4321
    >Speaking of their lack of their lack of a big man, what happened to
    >top 50 recruit Lawson?
    
    I don't remember Lawson ever having been highly ranked.  He in fact
    was by a wide margin the lowest ranked of his recruiting class, wasn't
    he?  From the first I heard of Chris Lawson he was described as a 
    "project" who looked like a career reserve.  He's very slow, has short
    arms and small hands, doesn't jump well, but has a nice shooting touch
    for those rare moments when he does manage to successfully receive the
    ball in the middle.
    
    But, to answer: He's been beat out by Matt Nover, another project who
    was originally slated as a substitute forward.
    
    >The ref called the foul on Chaney before Perry took his steps.
    
    The ref called the foul for a reach-around from behind about 20 feet
    from the hoop after Cheaney'd caught up with Carter several steps after
    the obvious travel.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.207ACC, phone home...for help!SHALOT::MEDVIDto discover war is not the answerMon Feb 18 1991 18:3312
>>But I do find it funny that you'd
>>    offer this comparison after Damon's best game (by far). 
>
>Wait a sec... weren't you the one who posted Montross' big 9 point game as
>compared to Grant Hill and Rodney Rogers 4 and 9 point games as some sort
>of indicator of Eric's progress?   Didn't you just do that today???
    
    Ewwwwww, good one there, Doug.  I can't wait to see what kind of 
    "Yes, but..." hypocritical response that one's gonna get!
    
    	--dan'l
    
15.208SACT41::ROSSNot a damn yankee anymoreMon Feb 18 1991 18:447
>I can't wait to see what kind of 
>    "Yes, but..." hypocritical response that one's gonna get!

Oh, I got a response.   Sort of a "waving the white flag" response.  But
Digital policy prevents me from posting personal mail without the author's
permission.  Can I Chris?  Chris-er-ino?  Chris-Man?  Christo of Knorropolis?
Chrismeister?  
15.209Still celebrating my new freedom to generalizeSHALOT::HUNTBlessed are the peacemakers ...Mon Feb 18 1991 18:529
 Say no more, Doug.   The picture is loud and clear.
    
 Besides, I'm sure you wouldn't deceive us.   After all, if it looks like a
 surrender, acts like a surrender, and sounds like a surrender, then it
 must be a surrender.
 
 Nuf said.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.210RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsMon Feb 18 1991 19:1314
    Chris can always revert to his "Blame it on the media" arguement - that
    always works.  Why, he even kinda worked in to his .201.
    
    The FBI's anti-organized crime unit could use Chris, that's fer sure.
    Just plop him down anywhere and let him point out hired guns.  HE sure
    seems to know a lot about them.  Heck, he even *knows* what Gaze, Locur
    and the Dove were *really* thinking.  He's simply amazing.  The real
    fack in those cases are that they are from the Big East and are
    foreign.  That's the only reasons there are.  But hey, I'd rather have
    a women-beater on MY team, and praise the guy, then have a *gasp*
    foreigner who might be *gasp* a hired gun.  Perhaps if those three had
    punched a few women around, they'd be more accepted.  
    
    JD
15.211Item 2B: come to the dome and pay homageHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughMon Feb 18 1991 19:204
Looks like we need to see Knorr's unconditional withdrawl list of
conditions and linkages...

TTom
15.212;-)RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBullwinkle RooooolsMon Feb 18 1991 19:2035
    Great game yesterday between IU ansd OSU.  Made even better by having
    the wife wif me.  
    
    Wife  "Now what game are you watching..."
    
    ME   :Ohio State and Indiana - 2 of the top teams in the country.  
    
    Wife:  Why's that one team look so slow and short?
    
    Me:  Oh, that's Indiana, their players are alwasy slow and short, but 
    all of them are playing out of position.
    
    Wife:  They don't look like ball players, sure hope they study...
    
    ME:  Yep, they all study, in fact, the slowest and shortest and most of
    position guys out there are all graduate students.
    
    Wife:  Really?  Do they still get scholarships?  Which one is there
    coach?
    
    Me:  Scholarships?  Surely you jest, theyse guys play hoops just to be
    near the master, Bob Knight (point Bob out).
    
    WIfe:  Geeez, he's got a pot stomach - the other coach looks better.
    I still can't believe they are playing so close - they must be playing
    their hearts out.
    
    Me:  Yep, overachieving to the max.  After the game, they all do
    volunteer work around town, and then study all night.
    
    Wife(at end of game):  Too bad they lost - but for a bunch of slow,
    short, out of position, volunteering grad students - they sure do play
    well.  If only they could get a big man...
    
    JD
15.213QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Feb 18 1991 19:376
HAH!

I just let out a whoop.... which I tried to strangle in mid whoop... and
that guy's looking over the cube at me again.

Mike JN
15.214In true Dean fashion, always congratulate the opponent.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportMon Feb 18 1991 19:3911
    Actually I commend Mr. Ross for some fine logical thinking.  I even
    went so far as to send him some congratulatory remarks via e-mail.
    
    The ultimate issue at hand is Playing Time.  Eric's not getting as much
    as he would've had he gone to IU, Michigan, or just about any other
    school north of LSU.  I certainly can't blame Dean for this.  Chilcutt
    is playing ahead of him and is having a terrific season.  Montross'
    time will come, I'm confident of that.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.215STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishMon Feb 18 1991 19:4120
    Classic, JD, absolutely classic.... I'm still laughing.....:-)
    
    Only wish my future wife had such amazing perception skills when it
    comes to Basketball....:-)
    
    Of course it isn't as funny as watching ACChris try to get up from 
    every thundering blow that he suffers in this notesfile.  
    
    Hey ACChris, a couple of things....
    
    	1:  Montross has been a HUGE disappointment this year...
    	2:  Dean can't develop a big man unless he is an incredible
    	    talent coming out of school.  Remember the old-adage,
    	    you can't coach size(the NBA loves those wide-bodies).
    	    Name one big-man that Dean developed that was not a
    	    highly rated HS All-American.
        3:  Henrik Rodl and Kenny Harris were both higher rated recruits 
    	    than Lawson was...
    	    Rodl was being hailed as the next Detlef Schrempf and Harris
    	    was supposed to take over for King Rice.  What happened?
15.216Harris could be good...HBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughMon Feb 18 1991 19:458
>    	    Rodl was being hailed as the next Detlef Schrempf and Harris
>    	    was supposed to take over for King Rice.  What happened?

Rodl became a hired gun at Chapel Hill and Harris is still looking for
some girl to beat up. In typcial Dean fashion, Rice will teach Harris to
congratulate the girl.

TTom
15.217Big Ten Saturday and SundayFORTSC::MOKTue Feb 19 1991 15:55117
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-18-91)  NCAA
Date: 18 Feb 91 22:04:57 GMT
 
Saturday:
 
#32 MICHIGAN STATE 62, #38 Illinois 58:  The Spartans held on as
	Illinois sliced an 8-point deficit to just 3 in the final minutes.
	The Spartans had leads of up to 9 points in the second half, and as
	little as nothing, but regained the 8-point lead in the final four
	minutes, and needed some free throws down the stretch to salt it
	away.  The first half was very closely contested, and after a very
	hot start by both teams, it stagnated into a 26-26 deadlock at the
	break.  Illinois came out cold in the second half, and Deon Thomas
	sprained an ankle which cost him some second half playing time.  MSU
	built a 38-29 lead before the Illini came back to tie the game at
	45-all and 47-all.  But, State built the winning 59-51 lead, and
	weathered a trey and another nice shot which cut the score down
	to 59-56.  Andy Pennick made some big free throws late.  Steve Smith
	scored 24 points, but he's still off of "his" game.  After making 42
	straight free throws earlier this year, he was just 7 of 13 in this
	game, and only 8 of 19 from the field.  Andy Kaufmann had 21 for the
	Illini.  A friend of mine Saturday night said "the refs stole the
	game from us".  I guess there were lots of bad calls in this game,
	and Lou got a marginal T, but the refs were probably gracious by not
	giving him a second T late when he probably deserved one.  15,138 at
	Breslin...
 
#48 PURDUE 89, #79 Minnesota 82:  Purdue almost blew a 13-point lead
	in the final 3 minutes, but Chuckie White made sure the five-game
	losing skid ended.  Up 78-65 with only 3:20 left, the Gophers went
	on a shooting tear and got within 79-76 with almost a minute left.
	But, some free throws and a White dunk off of a steal won it.
	Again, the Gophers were terribly outscored from the foul line, this
	time 39 to 16 (that's not the worst this year, even!).  But, they
	foul ALOT.  It didn't help them in this game that they got down by
	as much as 71-57 in the final five minutes, and 78-65 as I
	mentioned.  The strategy became one of fouling, as Purdue has not
	distinguished itself at the stripe this season.  But, when Chuckie
	White can nail 16 of 21, the gods are on your side.  Minnesota's
	11-1 run until the :55.6 mark, cutting the lead to 79-76, was a thing
	of beauty.  Several of the shots made were of the "circus" variety,
	and a couple of Purdue throwaways in the backcourt helped things
	along.  This game was like all the others, though.  Minnesota led
	most of the game's first 10 minutes, then Purdue got hot and built a
	five point lead until Rob Metcalf, who scored 16 points, drained a
	three at the halftime horn, to cut the Purdue lead to 36-34.  Purdue
	then struggled a bit out of the second half gate, but got hot
	again, and built the aforementioned 14-point lead before wilting.
	But, this lead was just too much for Minnesota to overcome.  Jimmy
	Oliver led Purdue with 30, though he vanished in the game's final
	minutes.  White had a well-deserved 16 points.  Walter Bond had 15
	and Arriel McDonald 13 for the Gophers.  14,123 on hand at Mackey...
 
#52 Michigan 64, #223 NORTHWESTERN 58:  The Wolverines held off the
	pesky Wildcats' bid to finally win a conference game.  Michigan
	trailed by 5 at halftime, 30-25, and the NU lead got as large as 7
	in the second half.  But, Demetrius Calip put the Wolverines ahead
	for good midway through the second half with a three pointer, as he
	scored 17 points.  The loss, NU's 14th straight, helped give them
	their longest skid since 1955-56.  Kevin Rankin, who scored 19
	against Michigan State the other night, was scoreless.  Charles
	Howell and Pat Baldwin each had 16, though.  7,278 at Welsh-Ryan...
 
#49 Wisconsin 56, #47 IOWA 55:  The Badgers did blow a 13-point lead
	in the final 5 minutes, but a Brian Good trey at the horn gave back
	the victory.  The win was Wisconsin's 5th straight in this series.
	The Badgers led 49-36 with just 5:47 left (that's right, just
	36 points for Iowa in 34 minutes!), before the Hawkeyes took the
	lead, incredibly, in the final seconds.  Iowa finally took that lead
	with just 6 ticks left when Kevin Smith hit a trey.  But, on the
	ensuing inbound pass from John Ellenson, muscle-man Patrick Tompkins
	dribbled the ball just past halfcourt and fed Good, who took a step
	back behind the line and won the game.  The halftime score was Iowa
	18, Wisconsin 17, which is hard to believe in this era.  But,
	Wisconsin got Iowa playing it's pace, and it eventually worked out
	for them.  The Hawkeyes were a pathetic 22 of 72 from the floor
	(30.5%), taking 25 more fielders and just one less FT than
	Wisconsin.  The two teams combined to shoot just 6 of 31 from
	three-point land, as the Badgers won this one ugly.  Tompkins led
	the Badgers with 17 points, and Smith had 13 for Dr. Tom.  15,500 at
	Carver-Hawkeye...
 
 
Sunday:
 
	#4  OHIO STATE 97, #2 Indiana 95 (2OT):  One of the best games you
	will ever see, but I couldn't!  I did get to listen to the two
	overtimes, though, and St. John Arena has never been louder.  Jim
	Jackson hit the tying shot to send the game to overtime, and Treg
	Lee's baseline J won it with :02 left in the second overtime.  The
	Buckeyes had to erase a five-point deficit at the end of regulation
	to force the first OT, and a four-point deficit at the end of the
	first extra-session to force the second, in what was a very
	frustrating loss for Indiana.  The Buckeyes also overcame the loss
	of point guard Mark Baker in the first half, as he injured an ankle
	and will miss the next week or so (definitely will miss the game at
	Illinois Wednesday).  Damon Bailey was tremendous in the OT's,
	scoring 17 of his career-high 32 points.  Jim Jackson was great as
	well, scoring 30 and snaring 11 boards.  Didn't you think OSU was
	dead just before the end of regulation?  IU was up 77-74, in
	possession of the ball, in the hands of Calbert Cheaney, no less?
	And he had the ball stripped.  OSU hit two FTs, and then after IU
	made just one FT at the other end, Jackson tied the game with one
	tick left.  Wow!  And Bailey had missed a couple of FTs down the
	stretch.  The Hoosiers then missed a really good chance to
	win the game at the end of the first OT, as OSU had tied it with :45
	left.  But, the Hoosiers just couldn't get it to drop.  Jamie
	Skelton hit some huge shots for the Buckeyes in the second
	overtime, as he saw extra duty due to Baker's injury.  Indiana
	missed a tough trey at the very final horn from Pat Graham.  Knight
	said, "Obviously, it's a game we really would like to have won.  We
	had our chances, and we can't ask for a hell of alot more than that".
	13,276 in Columbus...
 
[....]
15.218Purdue defeats Michigan 2OT Monday nightFORTSC::MOKTue Feb 19 1991 15:5996
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-19-91)  NCAA
Date: 19 Feb 91 16:49:09 GMT
 
Monday's Result:
 
#48 Purdue 83, #52 MICHIGAN 77 (2OT):  These two teams decided that
	what Indiana and Ohio State did Sunday was fun, so they did it, too.
	This was a pretty entertaining game for two second-division teams.
	Michigan led all of the first half, or nearly all of it, but
	couldn't shake Purdue, taking a 38-35 lead into the lockerroom.
	Both teams shot well, especially Purdue, which hit at 60%.  The
	second half was a completely different story, though, as both teams
	were cold.  However, Purdue, over the first 9:30 of the second half,
	outscored Michigan 14-4, taking a 49-42 lead.  But, Michigan hit a
	three and caught fire, going on a 12-1 run of it's own and building
	a 54-50 lead.  They had several chances to up that lead as Purdue
	continued to struggle (going nearly 10 minutes between field goals),
	but failed, and Purdue managed to regain a 59-57 lead inside of the
	final minute.  The Boilers even had possession of the ball with that
	lead, and 31.9 seconds remaining, when Matt Painter couldn't make an
	inbounds pass in 5 seconds, turning the ball over.  After running
	the clock, Demetrius Calip, who scored at least 32 points in the
	game, hit a short J with 1.9 seconds left to tie the game.  A
	desparation heave from Painter to Craig Riley under the basket nearly
	resulted in a Purdue win, but he was too far behind the backboard.
	Purdue led nearly all of the first overtime, and still had a 69-66
	lead with 20 seconds to go.  But, Kirk Taylor hit about a 23-foot
	trey with 12 seconds left to tie the game again, and Purdue never
	managed to get a shot off before the horn sounded.  So, tied again
	at 69, Michigan raced out quickly in the second OT and seemingly put
	the game away.  Calip started out with a three, then after a Riley
	free throw cut the score to 72-70, the Wolverines scored five more,
	three on a trey and two more on a Sam Mitchell slam.  Down 77-70,
	with just over 3 minutes left, the game changed again for good.
	Matt Painter hit a three to cut the deficit to 77-73, then Michigan
	began a series of terrible offensive possessions in which it took
	either hurried or ill-advised shots.  With Painter's three, Purdue
	scored the final 13 points of this game, mostly on Chuckie White,
	Riley, and Jimmy Oliver fielders and ensuing FTs.  Dick Vitale
	became quite critical of Steve Fisher's not having his team run the
	clock after getting the big lead.  It was a shocking turnaround in
	the second overtime, that's for sure.  James Voskuil had a big game
	for Michigan, scoring 16, while Craig Riley again outplayed his
	namesake, Eric Riley, getting a career-high (23, maybe?).  Oliver
	and White also were big scorers for Purdue, before alot of empty
	seats up at Crisler Arena...
  
Wednesday:
 
	#4   Ohio State at #38 ILLINOIS            7:00 pm CST
 
	(no major TV, but if you want to listen to it, you can catch the OSU
	network on WWWE out of Cleveland (around 1100 am?), or the Illinois
	network on WLS, 890 am, Chicago.  Both are 50,000 watt stations...
	As someone pointed out yesterday, Mark Baker has a badly turned
	ankle and most likely will not play.  Also, Deon Thomas turned his
	ankle at Michigan State Saturday and was hobbling around at practice
	yesterday, so his status for Wednesday is still undetermined...)
  
Thursday:
 
	#47  Iowa at #2 INDIANA                    7:00 pm
	#49  Wisconsin at #52 MICHIGAN             7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#48  Purdue at #32 MICHIGAN STATE          Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#79  Minnesota at #4 OHIO STATE            2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#38  Illinois at #47 IOWA                  7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#223 Northwestern at #49 WISCONSIN         1:00 pm
	#52  Michigan at #2 INDIANA                3:00 pm  ABC
 
Next Monday:
 
	#32  Michigan State at #79 MINNESOTA       8:30 pm  ESPN
 
RECORDS:
                New
Sagarin   AP    CNN   School          Overall  Big Ten
-------   --    ---   ------          -------  -------
 
    4      2     2    Ohio State        22-1    12-1
    2      4     4    Indiana           22-3    10-2
   38     26T   35    Illinois          18-7     8-4
   32     42    40    Michigan State    15-8     8-5
   49     NR    45    Wisconsin         12-10    6-6
   47     44    50    Iowa              17-8     6-7
   48     NR    NR    Purdue            13-10    5-8
   52     NR    NR    Michigan          12-11    5-8
   79     NR    NR    Minnesota         10-12    3-9
  223     NR    NR    Northwestern       5-18    0-13
15.219Iowa beats IndianaHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughFri Feb 22 1991 10:274
Iowa upset Indiana, 80-79 in OT. The Hoosiers missed a series of free
throws that could have won the game in regulation.

TTom
15.220AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhatever Homer wants, Homer gets...Fri Feb 22 1991 10:494
    	I guess Bob's had the guys hitting the books instead of practicin'
    their free throws.
    
    				/Don
15.221Don't think we'll hear any Bailey > Montross stuff today :^)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 22 1991 11:576
    Extract from Iowa @ IU box score:
    
    Bailey 0-3,0-2 0
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.222Had to be saidSHALOT::HUNTSame Old World OrderFri Feb 22 1991 12:043
 Bailey is better than Montross.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.223stiffHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughFri Feb 22 1991 12:093
You're right, Chris. Montross is much more a stiff than Bailey.

TTom
15.224ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Feb 22 1991 16:4127
    Wail, as sad as this turn a events is at least I won't have to put
    up with you people sniffing and sneering about how I'm a Ross-style
    poor-mouther... given that the season is progressing very nicely 
    along its way towards fulfilling my bold preseason prognostication.
    Here's the scoop:
    
    - Hoosiers cain't go on winning despite being consistently outrebounded
      by 10-15 boards and blocking/changing almost no shots inside.
    
    - Hoosiers' depth and talent is partly myth: this is a team of point
      guards, who are missing a center, a widebody forward reserve, and
      a_outside shooting threat.
    
    - Hoosiers' weaknesses were masked by unusually easy preconference and
      conference schedule cuz a_a confluence a_events with opponents' programs.
    
    - Hoosiers are a dangerous team but a limited one who waver when up against
      your modern sytle quick/strong widebody front lines - they'll croak in 
      the tourney against a much lower ranked team like LSU.  A team with the
      physical limitations of this one could only be truly dangerous when they
      a senior (not sophomore) dominated.
    
    - Damon Bailey had his career game after his opposite exited the Ohio State
      game with a_ankle injury.  He's gonna have his problems when up against
      big-time quickness like he saw with last night's Iowa frosh.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.225Musta been the refsHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughMon Feb 25 1991 11:584
Poor little Indiana struggled and barely got passsed the far superior
Michigan Wolverines, 112-79. 

TTom
15.226Looks like y'all were payin' attentionSHALOT::HUNTSame Old World OrderMon Feb 25 1991 13:377
 Saw in today's paper that Acie Earl, Iowa's stud widebody, got picked up
 for assaulting a female student.
 
 What gives, Big Tenners ???   You got your hoop riots and now your woman
 beaters ... you guys been taking notes from the ACC or what ???
 
 Bob Hunt
15.227ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 25 1991 17:2928
    re 1
    
    If you're looking for hoops riots, I refer you to the Big East, the
    Big8, and the SEC.  We have no hoops riots in the Big10.
    
    As for the woman-beating allegation, remember: "Innocent until proven
    guilty."  And even then, if it does turn out that Acie is a Univeristy
    of North Carolina at Chapel Hell-scumbag, the matter of face will STILL
    hinge on whether Dr. Malpractice tacitly endorses gal-abuse as did 
    Reverend Underachievement.
    
    re 2
    
    Indiana's perfect opponnet, another team with no inside game. Steal
    got outrebounded by 5, but that's much less than is usual against 
    the good squads.  Indiana blew out the Wolverines cuz they're more
    talented, if just as stunted.  G-g-give it u-up, TTom, you cain't 
    dispute what your main main said yesterday:
    
    	I don't see Indiana going that far.  They lack the big man,
    	the inside game, to be able to make a run for it in the tourney.
    
    						Jim Vulvano, 2/29/91
    						
    
  
    Big10 Tom  
  
15.228Big Ten last WednesdayFORTSC::MOKMon Feb 25 1991 19:1539
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-21-91)  NCAA
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 1991 16:14:50 GMT
 
Wednesday's Result:
 
#5  Ohio State 73, #36 ILLINOIS 64:  I found out an hour before
	tipoff that I was going to the game!  The game had its moments, but
	really wasn't very well played by either team.  Illinois missed
	countless "bunnies", and Ohio State couldn't hit a jumper to save
	them.  The Buckeyes were definitely "off" last night, as their
	offensive execution was terrible, mostly relying on one-on-one
	moves to get shots.  Because they could not hit a J, Illinois just
	sat back in a 2-3 zone most of the game, and watched the Buckeyes
	pass the ball around the perimeter.  Neither Mark Baker nor Deon
	Thomas played, so the effects were probably neutralized.  Ohio
	State led most of the game's first 10 minutes, but Illinois had
	one of its best streaks of the game in taking a 26-22 lead.  But,
	over the final 7 minutes of the half, the Buckeyes outscored them
	17-6, including a 10-0 run, and took a 39-32 lead to the lockerroom.
	The second half was much sloppier.  Ohio State took an early 44-35
	lead, but Illinois answered with 8 straight points to close to
	44-43.  The Buckeyes were still only up one at 50-49 with 8:35 left
	and shortly thereafter by 54-53, but Chris Jent finally hit a
	Buckeye trey to lead 57-53, and Treg Lee, who scored 14 points, made
	a huge rebound and basket for a 66-60 lead.  Andy Kaufmann picked up
	a T in the final 20 seconds when saying the magic words after a
	bizarre charge as he attempted a three-pointer.  Ohio State
	outscored Illinois by 13 points from the stripe, though the Buckeyes
	committed more second half fouls until the final couple of minutes
	when the Illini fouled on purpose.  Both teams shot 43% from the
	field.  Andy Kpedi probably had his finest game in an Illini
	uniform, picking up the slack for Thomas.  Alex Davis had a nice
	game as he seemed to fill in most for Baker.  Jim Jackson had a bad
	night.  Illinois blew countless second half opportunities to tie the
	game.  They just never could get over the hump, as Ohio State always
	answered with a clutch rebound or hoop.  Just over 13,000 at the
	Assembly Hall, mostly non-believers of an upset at that...
15.229Big Ten last ThursdayFORTSC::MOKMon Feb 25 1991 19:2363
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-22-91)  NCAA
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 1991 18:24:02 GMT
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#50 Iowa 79, #3 INDIANA 78 (OT):  The Hoosiers inability to hit a
	free throw at the end of regulation (they missed six straight), and
	the blowing of a 16-point second half lead doomed them last night,
	as James Moses tipped in a missed Chris Street tip of an Acie Earl
	bomb, at the first overtime horn.  Iowa enjoyed a huge rebounding
	advantage, and cleaned up at the stripe, as the Hoosiers ended up
	missing 15 of 34 attempts.  This is truly an amazing result, as IU
	had beaten the Hawkeyes by 11 at Iowa City earlier, and makes it
	much easier for Ohio State to win the Big Ten.  The loss also may
	have made the arguments about Indiana possibly being a #1 seed in
	the tournament moot.  This was Iowa's first win at Assembly Hall
	since 1985.  The Hawkeyes jumped out to a 5-0 lead as IU couldn't
	find the mark.  Once the Hoosiers got rolling, they led most of the
	first half, and took a 35-32 lead to the lockerroom.  They blitzed
	Iowa during the first six minutes of the second half, going on a
	15-2 run fueled by 9 points by Calbert Cheaney.  Down 50-34, it
	looked bleak for Iowa, but they scored 6 straight and gradually
	whittled the lead down to 65-64 with only 4:25 left.  Val Barnes,
	who with Acie Earl scored 19 points, hit a trey, and James Moses
	followed with another hoop to give Iowa a 69-65 late.  But, in the
	final two minutes, the Hoosier defense stepped it up a bit, as the
	Hawkeyes had trouble getting off shots and even travelled.  Hoops by
	Lyndon Jones and Chris Reynolds tied the game, but the missed free
	throws by people like Cheaney, Reynolds, and Matt Nover prevented
	the Hoosiers from winning in regulation.  IU did start finding the
	mark in OT, taking a 77-74 lead with two minutes to go on the
	strength of five FTs from Nover and Cheaney.  But, Hawkeye
	sharpshooter Troy Skinner drew two fouls, and nailed all four
	freebies (he's almost a 90% shooter).  With Iowa up one at 78-77,
	Cheaney was fouled on a drive and sank two more FTs to put the
	Hoosiers back up with 30+ seconds left.  Iowa held the ball until
	only 8 seconds were left, and called a timeout (I thought they
	waited too long).  A difficult inbounds pass was caught by Earl, who
	dribbled a couple of times and launched a J from well beyond his
	range.  It clanged off the rim right to Chris Street, who missed a
	bunny putback.  But, James Moses was right there to tip in the
	botched Street attempt, and the horn sounded to much jubilation on
	the Iowa bench.  Iowa had a ten board advantage over IU at the end
	of regulation, and the Hawks dominated the glass on that last
	sequence.  Cheaney scored 26 for IU, while Lyndon Jones tied a
	career-high with 21.  Strangely, Damon Bailey was scoreless and got
	in alot of pine-time last night.  Over 17,000 very disappointed fans
	in Bloomington...
 
#62 MICHIGAN 65, #43 Wisconsin 62:  The Badgers blew a big chance to
	take a positive step towards making the tournament, as Michael
	Talley scored Michigan's last six points in sparking them to victory
	in the game's final minute.  Wisconsin had the ball and a 60-59 lead
	with 1:12 left (erasing an 11-point second half Michigan lead), when
	John Ellenson was called for a 5-second violation.  Talley then hit
	a jumper with :54 left to give Michigan a 61-60 lead it would not
	relinquish.  Talley hit four FTs thereafter to clinch it.  Wisconsin
	has not won at Crisler since 1982, and even that win was later
	forfeited.  The previous win there was in 1979.  Demetrius Calip had
	16 points for Michigan and Talley had 14.  Ellenson, Willie Simms
	and Patrick Tompkins each had 15 for Wisconsin...
15.230Big Ten Saturday and SundayFORTSC::MOKMon Feb 25 1991 19:49171
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-25-91)  NCAA
Date: 25 Feb 91 20:49:31 GMT
 
Clem Haskins was publically reprimanded by Gopher AD Rick Bay for his
outburst to the media following Minnesota's heartbreaking loss at Ohio
State, while Iowa center Acie Earl was charged with simple assault
Sunday after an altercation with an ex-girl friend following the loss to
Illinois.  On the brighter side, Gene Keady and Jud Heathcote, two
beloved coaches in Illinois, looked like old pals after MSU's win in
East Lansing, and Lou Henson and Tom Davis shook hands before the game
Saturday as the hatchet was buried just a little...
  
Saturday's Results:
 
#45 MICHIGAN STATE 75, #42 Purdue 58:  The Spartans played a great
	second half and blew open what had been a close game.  Steve Smith
	and mates got off to a quick start, jumping out to a 14-7 lead, but
	then Purdue put on some defense and held the Spartans in check the
	rest of the first half, taking a 30-28 lead to the break.  However,
	Purdue's offensive woes rejoined them in the second half, and State
	quickly seized control of the game.  Dewayne Stephens, who often
	doesn't do much but has been a royal pain in Purdue's ass the past
	two seasons, led the second half charge with 14 points.  Stephens
	said, "The coach told me to shoot the ball more today, so I did and I
	hit the shots.  Once I started scoring, the guys kept getting me the
	ball."  MSU began the second half with something like a 17-6 run and
	just kept it going, though Jud Heathcote said, "The score makes this
	look like an easy win, but it wasn't.  We put a lot of defensive
	pressure on the ball in the second half, we dove for loose balls,
	and we scored on the break."  Purdue had a chance to do some damage
	after Mike Peplowski picked up his fourth foul and the lead was
	still only around 5 points.  But, Craig Riley had a lousy game
	inside for Purdue, and that was it.  Jimmy Oliver was only 6 of 18
	from the floor, though he led Purdue in scoring with 18 points.  The
	difference in this game was shooting, as the Spartans made 8 more
	field goals than Purdue in one less attempt.  MSU had a lot to do
	with Purdue's shot selection, however.  Steve Smith had 24 for
	MSU before 15,138 at the Breslin Center...
 
#5  OHIO STATE 63, #87 Minnesota 62:  Clem Haskins cried foul, but
	to no avail, as the Gophers played a sensational first half and
	almost pulled the unthinkable.  Minnesota beat the Buckeyes at their
	own game in that first half, scoring at least ten buckets on fast
	breaks after Buckeye missfires or when the press was broken.  The
	Gophers led 40-33 at the break, and still led 58-51 with just 6:07
	left when Clem Haskins was given a T.  It was prompted when Jim
	Jackson stole the ball and went out of bounds with it.  Official
	Steve Welmer mistakenly gave possession to OSU, and Haskins charged
	the floor (to midcourt) and was given the T by Ted Hilliary before
	official London Bradley could correct Welmer's call (typical B.S.
	officiating in this conference).  In rare postgame words from an
	official, Hilliary said, "London had it the other way.  He was
	coming in to correct the call.  It was going to be Minnesota's ball.
	Clem was out of his coach's box and, I felt, in an unsportsmanlike
	fashion."  Jackson hit the two T free throws, which began an 8-0
	Buckeye run to make the score 59-58 with 3:13 left.  The Gophers
	regained their composure and scored the next four points, all by
	Randy Carter, a good-looking freshman, to lead 62-59 with 1:44 to
	go.  Jackson hit another shot to cut the gap to 62-61 with 1:21
	left.  Ariel McDonald was then hit with a five-second violation with
	:46 to go, and Jamaal Brown drained a 15-footer with :32 left to
	make the score 63-62.  McDonald later drove the basket with :07 left
	and shot over Jackson.  The ball missed it's target and was tipped
	towards the out-of-bounds.  But, Chris Jent got to it and heaved it
	into the backcourt and out-of-bounds, leaving just one second left.
	Bob Martin's 15-footer clanged off the back of the rim to end the
	game.  Haskins said, "We really played well and we really won the
	game.  We beat the number two team in basketball and, unfortunately,
	the headlines tomorrow are going to show that we lost the game.  But
	the Gophers won the game by one point to seven points if we don't
	get the big-time screws put to us at the end.  Any time you play
	like we did tonight and don't come up with a win, it's really,
	really tough in coaching.  Because you do everything and then you
	get out there and they call a game like that.  And you get three
	jackasses and it really, really hurts your players.  Those three
	guys today were a disgrace to basketball in the Big Ten."  On Sunday
	he said, "I accept and understand the public reprimand.  But I'm
	still disappointed, not for Clem Haskins, but for this group of
	young men who played so hard and so well yesterday."  I think Clem
	learned his lessons well from Gene Keady when they were at Western
	Kentucky together...  Jackson scored 26 points while Kevin Lynch had
	14 for the Gophers.  13,276 in Columbus...
 
#36 Illinois 79, #50 IOWA 74:  Another strange home game for the
	Hawkeyes, but of the more emotional variety due to the happenings of
	the past year or so.  It's remarkable that this team could sandwich
	the Indiana road win with awful home offensive performances (and
	losses) to Wisconsin and Illinois.  Against Wisconsin a week ago
	Saturday, the Hawkeyes could only muster 35 points in the game's
	first 34 minutes, then lost on a trey at the horn 56-55.  This time,
	after getting out to an early 17-10 lead, Iowa went into it's funk,
	getting outscored 15-4 over the next 10 minutes to trail 25-21.
	Tehy managed to get the score knotted at 29 at intermission.
	Illinois, on the heels of 56% shooting, then took the game over,
	running out to leads of 38-33, 44-38 and 61-45, the latter with just
	over seven minutes to go.  The lead was still 71-56 Illinois with
	4:48 left when the Hawkeyes began to go wild from three-point land,
	led by James Moses, who scored 20 in the final minutes.  He pulled
	Iowa to within 76-74 with :35 to go.  By this time, the Illini were
	helping the Iowa cause by bricking free throw attempts and failing
	to guard the perimeter, though a couple of Moses' bombs would have
	made Larry Bird proud.  Rennie Clemons hit a free throw with :18
	left to give Illinois a 77-74 lead, as Moses fouled out.  He missed
	the second attempt, though, and Brooks Taylor rebounded and was
	fouled.  He promptly bricked both attempts, and Iowa had a chance to
	tie.  But, Clemons stripped Val Barnes of the ball, and Larry Smith
	dropped two freebies with :05 left to end the scoring.  Iowa, which
	had outrebounded Indiana by 10 the other night, was licked on the
	boards 41-26.  Andy Kaufmann scored 32 points as he hit 9 of 10
	shots in the second half, one a baseline bankshot which defied
	physics.  Moses scored 30, which may have been a career-high, and
	Acie Earl had 21.  15,500 loud but disappointed fans at Carver-
	Hawkeye, whom Moses later praised "because the Illinois fans were
	very rude to us in Champaign...and the players really have no
	knowledge of that controversy", referring to the Deon Thomas/Bruce
	Pearl incident.  Iowa didn't arrive in Iowa City until 5:30 am on
	Friday after the IU win, as the team plane was forced down in Peoria
	due to mechanical problems.  That should have been an omen...
 
 
Sunday's Results:
 
#43 WISCONSIN 79, #216 Northwestern 76:  Once again, the Wildcats
	appeared to have victory in their grasp, only to see it again slip
	away before a surprised Wisconsin Fieldhouse crowd of 10,042.  You
	really have to hand it to Northwestern for fighting so hard late in
	this awful season.  The Wildcats expanded a 42-40 halftime lead to
	61-52 with just 11:53 to play.  Wisconsin then put on it's surge to
	gain a 68-65 lead.  The game then see-sawed until the Badgers went
	ahead to stay 76-74 with only :57 left on a Willie Simms hoop as the
	shot clock was expiring.  A foul on NU's Don Brotz with :25 left
	allowed Wisconsin to help seal the victory.  Bill Foster was
	critical of the officiating, saying, "I know what Clem Haskins felt.
	You can fill in the blanks."  Pat Tompkins led Wisconsin with 18
	points, while Charles Howell had 20 for NU...
 
#3  INDIANA 112, #62 Michigan 79:  Indiana decided to blow off the
	steam of two straight losses by routing the Wolverines yesterday.
	This was the highest scoring output of the season for IU in a win
	more reminiscent of those in January than lately.  The Michigan
	guards, who do the bulk of the scoring, got out of the blocks
	slowly, and IU was able to pull away from a 32-28 advantage to lead
	48-35 at the intermission.  The Hoosiers poured it on most of the
	second half, as even Pat Knight played.  Four Hoosiers made double
	figures in scoring, led by Calbert Cheaney's 30.  Demetrius Calip
	eventually scored 28 after I believe only having 4 points at
	halftime.  IU outscored the Wolverines by 21 from the stripe.
	Michigan did win the battle of the boards 40-35, before 16,285 in
	Bloomington... 
 
Tonight:
 
	#45  Michigan State at #87 MINNESOTA       8:30 pm CST  ESPN
 
RATINGS/RECORDS (old ratings):
 
Sagarin   AP    CNN   UPI   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ---   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    5      2     2     2    Ohio State       14-1    24-1      24-1
    3      4     4     4    Indiana          11-3    23-4      23-4
   36     30    35    NR    Illinois          9-5    19-8      18-8
   45     37    40    NR    Michigan State    9-5    16-8      16-8
   43     NR    45    NR    Wisconsin         7-7    13-11     12-10
   50     NR    50    NR    Iowa              7-8    18-9      16-9
   62     NR    NR    NR    Michigan          6-9    13-12     13-12
   42     NR    NR    NR    Purdue            5-9    13-11     13-11
   87     NR    NR    NR    Minnesota         3-10   10-13     10-13
  216     NR    NR    NR    Northwestern      0-14    5-19      3-19
15.231last night....FORTSC::MOKTue Feb 26 1991 16:2863
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (2-26-91)  NCAA
Date: 26 Feb 91 16:03:55 GMT
 
Monday's Result:
 
#45 Michigan State 76, #87 MINNESOTA 74:  The Spartans played great
	for about 30 minutes, then some terrible ballhandling and passing
	almost let a victory slip away.  Steve Smith was particularly sloppy
	down the stretch.  He appears to be developing a big-time attitude,
	I'm afraid.  The Spartans were ahead 62-46 when the Gophers began to
	chip away with some nice shooting (mostly not from Kevin Lynch,
	though he did have a couple).  It was 64-53, and before you knew it,
	the lead was down to three on a couple of occasions within the final
	couple of minutes.  Lynch hit a major league bomb at the final horn
	for the final margin of two, a banker, no less.  Nate Tubbs, from my
	high school, had a huge hand in the Gophers' late run, making a
	couple of treys and some other nice shots.  He's turning into a good
	player.  Mike Peplowski fouled out, as the Spartans lost both of
	their inside people to fouls down the stretch.  Kind of a sedate
	crowd at The Barn, as Minnesota must now win the rest of it's games
	in order to finish at .500.  This will not be easy, with road trips
	to Columbus and Bloomington left.  What's with Mark Montgomery's
	long passes against the press?  He either threw it over a teammates
	head out of bounds or into a Gophers hands.  Not a very good job by
	MSU down the stretch.  This kind of breakdown in the tournament will
	translate into a quick exit...
 
Thursday:
 
	#3   Indiana at #45 MICHIGAN STATE         6:00 pm ESPN (last one)
	#62  Michigan at #36 ILLINOIS              7:00 pm
	#216 Northwestern at #87 MINNESOTA         7:00 pm
	#43  Wisconsin at #42 PURDUE               7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#3   Indiana at #43 WISCONSIN              Noon    Big Ten/Raycom
	#36  Illinois at #216 NORTHWESTERN         2:00 pm Big Ten/Raycom
	#42  Purdue at #50 IOWA                    7:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#45  Michigan State at #5 OHIO STATE       1:00 pm ABC
	#87  Minnesota at #62 MICHIGAN             3:00 pm ABC
  
RATINGS/RECORDS:
 
         New    New
Sagarin   AP    CNN   UPI   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ---   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    5      2     2     2    Ohio State       14-1    24-1      24-1
    3      5     5     4    Indiana          11-3    23-4      23-4
   45     35    ??    NR    Michigan State   10-5    17-8      17-8
   36     30    NR    NR    Illinois          9-5    19-8      18-8
   43     NR    NR    NR    Wisconsin         7-7    13-11     12-10
   50     37    ??    NR    Iowa              7-8    18-9      16-9
   62     NR    NR    NR    Michigan          6-9    13-12     13-12
   42     NR    NR    NR    Purdue            5-9    13-11     13-11
   87     NR    NR    NR    Minnesota         3-11   10-14     10-14
  216     NR    NR    NR    Northwestern      0-14    5-19      3-19
15.232SACT41::ROSSOh no, thirtysomething soon!Tue Feb 26 1991 16:589
A major gripe.. If I were in charge of negotiating the Big 10's contract with
ESPN, I would give them the following ultimatum:

	Either we flip-flop every other week on who leads off on Big Monday,
	or else we'll take our games elsewhere.

It's ridiculous to have to watch the Big East games run over EVERY SINGLE 
WEEK past the 9:30 time slot.    Half the Big 10 teams are in the same
time zone as the Big East.
15.233I'd like to see them change it too...CHIEFF::CHILDSthis house sure gone crazyTue Feb 26 1991 17:257
 Blame the big east refs Doug they're whistle happy. It was better when they
 only had 5 fouls to give the refs were a bit more forgiving...

 I saw a replay of the call and I'd say Clem had a right to bitch...

 mike
15.234another Big 10 scandalHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughWed Feb 27 1991 12:2211
Yo Cap, better get over here!

Acie Earl, Iowa sophomore, has pleaded guilty to the assault of a
17-year-old girl. Acie remains on the team but apparently his punishment
is that he can't start. 

Tough stand there, Iowa. Much more severe than the famed King Rice event.
I guess King had a better lawyer: no assault charge and still starting.
It's easy to see the moral fiber of the Big10. Not.

TTom
15.235STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishWed Feb 27 1991 14:1125
    Ttom,
    
    Barking up the wrong tree here son.... Personally I don't give a rat's
    ass what happens at Iowa.  I'm a Indiana fan not an Iowa fan.  The King
    Rice affair raised my gander because of the hypocritical treatment that
    King Rice was given by Dean Smith and the upstanding Carolina program.
    
    It was embarrassing seeing Dean Smith bow to the pressure of winning by
    failing to properly discipline a convicted criminal.
    
    Acie Earl, BTW, is not starting.  The girl(an old-time friend) dropped
    the charges and pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor assault charge(from
    what I heard he just grabbed her arm in an arguement.)  That's a little
    different than choking a girl, resisting arrest, fighting with cops and
    punching a hole in a cell wall all the while being blasted out of his
    mind by alcohol or some other substance.
    
    I don't care what happens at Iowa, but from what I read it's not a 
    serious situation.
    
    Cap
    
    P.S.  Of course it's not even close to being as serious as shaving
    	  points on the behalf of some organized crime figure.  What 
    	  school was alledged to have done that?????  :-)
15.236clear nowHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughWed Feb 27 1991 15:4511
Acie, unlike the object of your focus King, was convicted of assault on a
girl. Very much like King, he received little or not punishment from the 
school or team. 

You're right, Cap, wrong tree. I mistook your previous notes as an
indication of your interest in this type of injustice. I understand now
that you merely have a hardon for Dean Smith and aren't interested in
anything like "hypocritical treatment", "failing to properly discipline"
and the like. It will help all of us interpret your future notes. 

TTom
15.237STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishWed Feb 27 1991 16:0931
    No TTom,
    
    Simple assault is a misdemeanor, no battery was involved which means no 
    physical harm was committed to the girl in question.  There was only
    a threat or presumed threat, stemming from an argument.(Acie Earl
    situation)
    
    Felonious Assault and battery is a felony in which physical harm was
    committed.  This is what happened in the King Rice affair.
    
    There is a huge difference between the two.  If Acie Earl had committed
    the latter and still remained on the team, I would remain the same.
    
    Anyone who is involved in a heated argument with another person runs
    the risk of being charged with simple assault.
    
    Get your facts straight before you go on an unwarranted attack.  As
    much as I like to rag on Dean Smith, the King Rice/Smith situation was
    completely wrong and an embarrassment to the university and college
    basketball and it would have been wrong at any school, Indiana
    included.  The Acie Earl situation is not even close to being the same
    situation.
    
    Before you go out trying to assume my motives in a situation, why don't
    you think before you try to analyze me personally?
    
    Better start using the ol' noggin before trying to compare to
    situations that are different as night and day....
    
    Cap
    
15.238SACT41::ROSSOh no, thirtysomething soon!Wed Feb 27 1991 16:1910
>Very much like King, he received little or not punishment from the 
>school or team. 

Acie got "little", King got "none".... unless we count those extra laps
he had to run after practice. :-)

>I understand now
>that you merely have a hardon for Dean Smith

Mine's bigger.
15.239nextHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughWed Feb 27 1991 16:236
>    ... As
>    much as I like to rag on Dean Smith, 

Q.E.D.

TTom
15.240NextSTRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishWed Feb 27 1991 16:4611
    
    TTom,
    
    HA!  Your response reminded me a little of Saddam Hussein.  Get your
    butt kicked(in an argument) but try and extract a little quote and make 
    it into a tiny victory.
    
    Oh well, try again sometime, but this time do a little research so that
    you're not embarrassed by the actual facts.
    
    Cap :-)
15.241ass, butt; what's next?HBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughThu Feb 28 1991 11:3124
Cap,

Let's do a quick review:

1. I baited you.

2. You stated the case that while King and Acie were both convicted of 
assault, 

>    ... The King
>    Rice affair raised my gander because of the hypocritical treatment that
>    King Rice was given by Dean Smith and the upstanding Carolina program.

I didn't - never, don't, won't - dispute either your description of your
reaction to the King Affair or your characterization of the King Affair. 

3. This is pure gravy!

>    ... Personally I don't give a rat's
>    ass what happens at Iowa.  

Go Big 10. ;-)

TTom
15.242CAM::WAYWhen Nick returns: Mother of all PartiesThu Feb 28 1991 11:324
15.243STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishThu Feb 28 1991 14:0317
    TTom,
    
    You didn't bait me with the Acie Earl situation, you baited me with an
    underhanded personal stab.  King and Acie's(good poker hand) situation
    are on different ends of the spectrum and you looked foolish trying to 
    compare the two.
    
    I don't care if you want to rag on the Big10.  Nothing pleased me more
    than Illinois get caught with their hand in the cookie jar and would
    feel the same about any Big10 team or player that breaks the rules and
    is not justly punished.
    
    I just thought that with all the criminal-atheletes that have passed
    through NC State that you'd know the difference between Simple Assault
    and Assault and Battery. :-) (many smilies)
    
    Cap
15.244SACT41::ROSSSome people call me Maurice...whoowooThu Feb 28 1991 17:259
Another BIG night in college hoop:

	Indiana at Michigan State   7:00  ESPN
and     Tar Heels at Georgia Tech   9:00  ESPN

Look for an easier-than-expected IU win {say, 84-72} as Bobby tunes up the 
team for the tournament.


15.245a fanHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughThu Feb 28 1991 19:235
Actually, Cap, I'm a fan of the Big 10. My sister went to Purdue and my
brother went to Northwestern. Lots of friends who went to some of the
others.

TTom
15.246dot dot dotANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewThu Feb 28 1991 20:1815
    HUGE game for the Hoosiers, they need to win the rest in order to 
    stay as overrated as possible so as to get the best seed and there-
    fore the weakest opponents... Michigan's recruiting class is shaping
    up as maybe the best ever... Apparently Poploski's knee is acting up
    again and that's why the poor play... MrT is going to Mad City for
    the second toughie of the week for the poor Hoosiers... Rumor has
    Gene Keady leaving Purdue for the UNLV job (one ugly coach for
    another)... If Yoder don't git his boys into the NCAAs he could be
    toast...  Clem Haskins' recruiting isn't shaping up as too good, he
    and Rick Bay aren't getting along, he may split Minnesota for a worse
    job... Dr. Tom Davis has been nominated by technical analysts for the
    much coveted Dean Smith Coaching Incompetence Cup (a spitoon of the
    type used by choking patients in dentist offices)...
    
    Big10 Tom
15.247Games last nightFORTSC::MOKFri Mar 01 1991 21:23145
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-1-91)  NCAA
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1991 20:13:05 GMT
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#4  Indiana 62, #35 MICHIGAN STATE 56:  The Hoosiers got off to a
	great start, then had to fend off the Spartans in Steve Smith's
	final home game.  Fend off maybe isn't the right term.  IU only
	could make two of it's final 16 field goal attempts in this game (!)
	spanning the last 15:51, and still won!  That's because the Spartans
	could only make 10 of 30 the entire second half!  Yet, the Spartans
	still could have won this game.  Eric Anderson was only 5 of 13.
	Smith could only hit 9 of 22.  Matt Steigenga ripped the cords for
	17 first half points, but went scoreless in the second half.  Both
	coaches blamed poor officiating on their team's second half woes.
	"Three or four of those shots were Damon Bailey under the basket
	where he was fouled every time.  I thought it was Cubans cutting
	down banana stalks.", is how Bob Knight put it after the game.  Jud
	Heathcote added, "I know Steve Smith got butchered a couple of times
	on drives, and they (the officials) just looked at him.  I'm not
	questioning the officiating [right!].  But in a defensive game like
	this, if you get some of those calls it can make a difference."  IU
	got off to something like a 10-0 start, and then State spent the
	rest of the first half catching up.  They did, though, as the score
	was knotted at 33 at the break.  Calbert Cheaney hit his first three
	shots but was then shut out the rest of the half by Dwayne Stephens.
	During the first 4:09 of the second half, the Hoosiers reestablished
	their lead at 43-35 as Cheaney hit three more shots.  That was it
	for him in the game.  MSU closed to 43-41 around the eight minute
	mark.  Matt Nover hit a short J to give his team a 45-41 lead, but
	IU relied on some better free throw shooting down the stretch to win
	the game.  The Hoosiers had another 6-point lead at 52-46 before the
	end.  Cheaney had 18 points and Anderson 10 as the only IU in double
	figures.  Smith had 19 in his Breslin Center finale, and with
	Steigenga's 17 were the only Spartans in double figures.  Smith had
	a lousy game, as he was brilliant one moment and then forcing
	something awful the next.  Knight said, "The most satisfying thing
	was when we had to win, we did.  We hung on."  Jud added, "...In
	these kinds of games it's hard to single out anyone who had a great
	game.  These kinds of games just don't look good."  15,138 on hand,
	hoping the Spartans fare better the rest of the way at Ohio State
	and at Michigan...
 
#32 ILLINOIS 68, #68 Michigan 65:  Illinois won another one "ugly"
	(as the Chicago Tribune put it), overcoming a horrendous first half
	of shooting to overtake the Wolverines in the game's final 15
	minutes.  The Illini couldn't shoot from the field in the first
	half, they couldn't shoot from the line at all, and generally looked
	disorganized all night.  Yet, they won.  Michigan was only 22-56
	from the floor themselves, so that helped.  The Wolverines did get
	off to a good start, though, and led at halftime 34-29, though 
	they could have and should have led by much more.
	Michigan still led 40-31 5:24 into the second half when the Illini
	went on a 28-11 run, making nine straight shots, including a bank
	shot from three-point land from Rennie Clemons, who hasn't shot much
	from out there this year.  The lead remained at 8 with just 1:59 to
	go when the Illini tried to "purdue" one away.  Demetrius Calip and
	Michael Talley combined for three treys to draw Michigan within
	65-64 with just 24 seconds left.  Andy Kaufmann then bricked two
	free throws (he once hit 32 consecutive this season), but the Illini
	rebounded after the second miss and Kaufmann hit one of two for a
	66-64 lead with :15 left.  Calip then hit one free throw with 6
	seconds left for a 66-65 score.  Kaufmann was quickly fouled, and
	he made the first one for a 67-65 lead.  He missed the second, but
	somehow the Illini picked up the loose ball and Andy was given
	another reprieve.  He again hit the first shot for a 68-65 lead, and
	again missed the second.  Michigan appeared to rebound this one, but
	a bad pass allowed the Illini to steal the ball and the final two
	ticks mercifully expired.  Eric Riley scored 13 in the first half
	for Michigan, but only four in the second half as Andy Kpedi held
	him in check.  Calip had 16 points, but was only 6 of 17 from the
	floor.  Kaufmann had 18 for Illinois, but was just 5 of 15 from the
	floor and 8 of 14 from the stripe.  Clemons and Larry Smith each
	had 14.  The Illini, at 44%, ended up outshooting Michigan.  14,584
	at the Assembly Hall...
 
 
#75 MINNESOTA 88, #209 Northwestern 70:  The Mildcats lost their 15th
	conference game in as many tries as the Gophers finally won a home
	game themselves.  The current losing streak of 16 games for NU is
	it's longest in 67 years.  The loss marked the 45th straight on the
	Big Ten road for them as well.  The Gophers were a bit off too,
	blowing a 15-point first half lead as the Cats closed to one at the
	buzzer, 38-37.  NU then took an early second half lead of 40-38
	before Minnesota turned the tables.  One stretch saw the Gophers
	extend a 43-42 lead to 55-42.  Northwestern then cut the lead to six
	at 63-57 before falling apart in the game's final 6 minutes, as the
	Gophers went on a 25-13 tear.  Kevin Lynch led the Gophers in
	scoring with 22 points, and Ernest Nzigamasabo (we haven't called
	his name much this season - "Zig-uh-muh-za-bo") had 21 in perhaps
	his best game so far.  Pat Baldwin was 10 of 11 from the field and
	led NU with 23 points.  14,597 at Minneapolis...
 
#47 PURDUE 69, #54 Wisconsin 62:  Purdue overcame a late first half
	8-point deficit, and then held off the Badgers in a tight ballgame
	at Mackey Arena.  The Boilers got off to another sluggish offensive
	start against Wisconsin, sort of like the first game in Madison.
	From a 7-7 tie the Badgers jumped out to a 15-9 lead.  The lead
	remained around five points until it was extended to 27-19 with
	under five minutes to go in the half.  Purdue then went on it's best
	run of the game, outscoring Wisconsin 11-2 the rest of the half in
	taking a 30-29 lead to the break.  The second half remained close.
	It was 50-48 Purdue under the 12 minute mark when the Badgers took a
	couple of small leads, the biggest being of I believe three points.
	The game was retied at 57 with just over two minutes left when
	Purdue took command.  The Boilers went ahead 60-57, and after the
	Badgers closed to one, Jimmy Oliver hit a trey as the shot clock was
	expiring for a 63-59 lead.  Willie Simms had a three-footer
	rejected by Chuckie White when the Badgers had a chance to tie the
	game at 63.  Purdue finally got the lead above four in the
	final :30 by hitting some free throws, and the Badgers were unable
	to free Tim Locum for any threes.  The others attempted were
	missed.  The Badgers shot well from the stripe while the Boilers
	labored.  White had several big baskets inside down the stretch, as
	the Boilers did a good job on Patrick Tompkins again.  14,123 on
	hand for the students' final home game of the season...
 
Saturday:
 
	#4   Indiana at #54 WISCONSIN              Noon CST   Big Ten/Raycom
	#32  Illinois at #209 NORTHWESTERN         2:00 pm    Big Ten/Raycom
	#47  Purdue at #43 IOWA                    7:00 pm
Sunday:
 
	#35  Michigan State at #6 OHIO STATE       1:00 pm ABC (national?)
	#75  Minnesota at #68 MICHIGAN             3:00 pm ABC (regional?)
 
RATINGS/RECORDS:
 
  New    New    New   New
Sagarin   AP    CNN   UPI   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ---   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    6      2     2     2    Ohio State       14-1    24-1      24-1
    4      5     5     7    Indiana          12-3    24-4      24-4
   32     30    NR    NR    Illinois         10-5    20-8      19-8
   35     35    ??    NR    Michigan State   10-6    17-9      17-9
   43     37    ??    NR    Iowa              7-8    18-9      16-9
   54     NR    NR    NR    Wisconsin         7-8    13-12     12-11
   47     NR    NR    NR    Purdue            6-9    14-11     14-11
   68     NR    NR    NR    Michigan          6-10   13-13     13-13
   75     NR    NR    NR    Minnesota         4-11   11-14     11-14
  209     NR    NR    NR    Northwestern      0-15    5-20      3-20
15.248oh those helpful handy REFS AGNT99::CHILDSI was testing the bounds of realityMon Mar 04 1991 12:545
Second time in a few weeks that the refs had the say in an OSU victory. I
think it's a conspiracy to keep a #1 ranking for a Big Ten team in the
Midwest Regionals. Shameful call yesterday considering the wide open play
of the rest of the game. Shades of Seton Hall/Michigan....
15.249ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Mar 04 1991 14:508
    Third time.  Don't forget Perry Carter carrying the ball atop his
    manly shoulder after stealing the ball from Calbert as the clock
    ticked down to zero.  True, Indiana didn't deserve to win anyway.
    The most egregious of the three certainly would be the Minneosta
    call that led to the now infamous "three jackasses" vituperations from
    Clem.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.250AGNT99::CHILDSI was testing the bounds of realityMon Mar 04 1991 15:475
 Agreed the 5 second call was the most bogus. What did ole Clem say? All
 I got to hear or read back here in the NECCJ (tm) was that he got reprimanded.

 mike
15.251Big Ten last Sat and SunFORTSC::MOKMon Mar 04 1991 21:52181
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-4-91)  NCAA
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 1991 21:10:01 GMT
 
The Buckeyes clinched at least a tie for the Big Ten title yesterday,
their first since 1971 (Luke Witte, Alan Hornyak, etc.).  It wasn't
easy, though.  Indiana continued it's surge after the Iowa loss with a
second straight big road win.  Illinois just about nailed down third
place for the year, Purdue kept alive it's NCAA hopes with a stunning
comeback at Iowa, and Michigan probably iced an NIT berth.  Minnesota
was eliminated from postseason play.  Wisconsin dropped another game and
further jeopardized it's post-season aspirations (NIT at best now).
Michigan State lost yet another heartbreak to an excellent team...
 
Saturday:
 
#4  Indiana 74, #54 WISCONSIN 61:  The Badgers led by three at the
	break, but IU's superior execution in the last ten minutes of the
	game made it look easy at the end.  The Badgers tight defense (most
	of the time) held the Hoosiers to just 23 first half points.
	Calbert Cheaney himself scored more than that in the second half,
	24, as Bob Knight switched to a 1-3-1 offense in the final 20
	minutes and watched his team blister Wisconsin for 51 points.  The
	final five minutes were vintage Indiana, as, with the game still
	very much in doubt, the Hoosiers time-and-again worked for great,
	easy shots and made them.  Steve Yoder called Cheaney "by far the
	best player in the Big Ten".  Knight summed it up well:  "Wisconsin
	seems to be starcrossed.  They've played well but come up a bit
	short.  But with the fan support they've had, they could be very
	tough in the NIT".  Eric Anderson chipped in with 11 points, while
	Greg Graham looked very quick in getting 10.  Cheaney ended up with
	30 points.  Willie Simms had 22 for Wisconsin, and Tim Locum 13,
	all in the first half (I don't think that's the first time that's
	happened).  Another great road victory for the Hoosiers, who could
	have gone into the dumper after the home loss to Iowa.  11,924
	filled the old UW Fieldhouse...
 
#32 Illinois 91, #209 NORTHWESTERN 81:  The Illini shot 59% to fend
	off the pesky Wildcats, who are playing pretty well despite their
	awful record.  Actually, the final score is probably a bit
	misleading, as Sweet Lou put in the walkons.  Uncharacteristically
	for this season, both teams shot well over 50% (Illinois was 59.6
	while NU was 55.6).  The Illini pulled away late in the first half
	for a six-point lead at 40-34.  The Wildcats had hung tough all
	half.  Illinois then surged ahead quickly in the second half,
	building leads of 49-38 and 64-48.  The Illini hit 18 of their first
	24 second half shots.  Many aspects of the game were quite even, as
	Northwestern didn't embarrass themselves.  Larry Smith scored a
	game-high 26 points, 12 of them coming from the stripe.  Andy
	Kaufmann had 21 on 10-15 shooting.  Don Brotz had 22 points for NU.
	Kevin Rankin had 15.  A sellout crowd of 8,117 saw this game at
	Welsh-Ryan Arena...
 
#47 Purdue 70, #43 IOWA 65:  Purdue staged a tremendous comeback in
	the game's final 7:56, outscoring Iowa 21-4 to grab a huge victory.
	The players had dedicated the game to Gene Keady, who's mother had
	passed away either Thursday night or Friday.  Keady also got the
	heave-ho, earning two technicals (he looked grouchy from the opening
	tipoff).  The first one came only about two minutes into the game,
	as Tom Rucker whistled him after calling Matt Painter for one of
	those touch fouls.  The second one came about 5 or so minutes into
	the second half after another call Gene didn't like.  The Purdue
	radio announcer commented, "Gene's over-reacting again".  Iowa
	really didn't cash in on either T, though.  One of Jimmy Oliver's
	patented, angled, bank-in trifectas won this game in the final 20
	seconds (believe it or not, Iowa fans, he's made that shot at other
	times this year).  The first half was pretty interesting, and
	high-scoring, as Troy Skinner drilled a bomb at the horn to tie the
	game at 38 heading into the lockerroom.  Purdue had started quickly,
	as Acie Earl sat, and led 18-13 when he entered.  Iowa then went on
	an 11-2 run, going ahead 24-20, much to the delight of the loud
	Carver-Hawkeye sellout.  Purdue then regained a 36-31 lead just
	before halftime and another Iowa surge.  Purdue scored the first
	hoop of the second half, 40-38, then didn't score again until about
	another six minutes elapsed, as the Hawkeyes led 49-40.  The teams
	traded baskets, then, over the next 6 minutes, until Iowa took a
	61-49 lead, with 7:59 left.  Purdue, over the next 5+ minutes,
	scored 11 straight points to close to 61-60.  During this stretch
	the Hawkeye offense broke down, either missing shots or committing
	turnovers.  Even with this help, Purdue blew four consecutive
	chances to overtake the Hawkeyes, including two bricks at the line
	from master bricklayer Chuckie White.  Val Barnes finally broke the
	ice for Iowa to give them a 63-60 lead and seemingly the kick in the
	pants the team needed.  But, that's when Oliver woke up, as he
	bombed in a three to tie the game at 63 late.  Earl then missed a
	pretty short one, leading to Oliver's bank-in three and a 66-63
	Purdue lead, this with only about 20 seconds left.  Iowa then missed
	it's own three, and Craig Riley nailed two freebies after a foul.
	After an Earl dunk, White finally hit a couple of FTs to close out
	the scoring.  Oliver led Purdue in scoring with 21 points, Ian
	Stanback had 15 in a very good performance, and Riley and Linc
	Darner had 11 each.  Barnes led Iowa with 14 points.  Earl and
	Skinner had 12 each.  Iowa's play noticibly drops when Earl is on
	the bench.  The officiating in this game was interesting as well, as
	the Hawkeyes were allowed their style of board crashing and back
	climbing, in addition to the Keady kickout.  There was also a
	phantom whistle on Acie Earl, called by Tom Rucker, as Earl was
	demonstrating to another ref a move Riley had just made.  The groan
	of the Iowa crowd when Oliver dropped in his 25-footer was
	incredible...
 
 
Sunday:
 
#6  OHIO STATE 65, #35 Michigan State 64:  The Buckeyes continue to
	live dangerously, as the Spartans gave it all they had before
	falling on a foul shot.  OSU seemingly put this game away around the
	two minute mark, leading 64-57.  One of the definitive hoops in the
	OSU surge was a steal after a bad Andy Pennick pass and subsequent
	dunk.  The Buckeyes must have thought the game ended then, though,
	as Matt Steigenga (wasn't Keith and Dick's argument over the
	pronunciation of his name silly?) hit a beautiful three to tie the
	game at 64 with :39 still left.  The Buckeyes got a good shot from
	Jamaal Brown with :05 left, but he sent it in hard and it came right
	back to him.  Pretty much in one motion, he rebounded and re-shot,
	as Steve Smith tapped his shooting elbow.  The whistle blew as Brown
	went down hard, and after bricking the first FT, he rattled in the
	second to win the game.  The oft-mentioned refs' convention around
	the scorer's table preceded the FT's, though, as one second was put
	back on the clock.  The ensuing MSU inbounds was thrown clean over
	the opposite end line, so OSU got to inbound under it's own hoop to
	end the game.  Smith had 23 to lead the Spartans, but he was only 9
	of 25 from the floor and never drew a foul while shooting (he never
	went to the line at all).  He also was careless at times.  Steigenga
	and Dewayne Stephens played solid games.  Neither team shot very
	well, but it was an interesting game, as MSU led a good deal of it,
	including 33-32 at halftime.  Jim Jackson had 20 for the Buckeyes.
	13,276 worn-out fans at Columbus...
 
#68 MICHIGAN 68, #75 Minnesota 60:  Michigan really played well
	yesterday and ensured a losing season for the Gophers.  UM won
	this game in the first half, sprinting out to a 39-27 lead at the
	break.  Demetrius Calip hit 5 threes in the game, and scored 29
	points.  He's really had a fine season for Michigan and should cop a
	few post-season accolades (he was a key player filling in for
	overrated Sean Higgins two years ago during Michigan's glory run).
	The Gophers had a balanced attack, but they just couldn't keep up.
	Dana Jackson had 14 for this basically young team, one which will get
	much better soon.  Michigan is probably a lock for the NIT now, but
	a win against Michigan State next Saturday would ice it.  10,485
	at Crisler Arena...

Wednesday:
 
	#6  Ohio State at #47 PURDUE                7:00 pm CST
	#32 Illinois at #54 WISCONSIN               7:00 pm
 
Thursday:
 
	#75 Minnesota at #4 INDIANA                 7:00 pm
	#43 Iowa at #209 NORTHWESTERN               7:00 pm
 
Saturday:
 
	#54  Wisconsin at #75 MINNESOTA             Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#35  Michigan State at #68 MICHIGAN         2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#209 Northwestern at #47 PURDUE             1:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#4  Indiana at #32 ILLINOIS                 11:00 am Big Ten/Raycom
	#6  Ohio State at #43 IOWA                   1:00 pm ABC (regional)
  
[End of Regular Season]
 
RATINGS/RECORDS:
 
  Old    Old    Old   Old
Sagarin   AP    CNN   UPI   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ---   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    6      2     2     2    Ohio State       15-1    25-1      25-1
    4      5     5     7    Indiana          13-3    25-4      25-4
   32     30    NR    NR    Illinois         11-5    21-8      20-8
   35     35    ??    NR    Michigan State   10-7    17-10     17-10
   43     37    ??    NR    Iowa              7-9    18-10     16-10
   47     NR    NR    NR    Purdue            7-9    15-11     15-11
   54     NR    NR    NR    Wisconsin         7-9    13-13     12-12
   68     NR    NR    NR    Michigan          7-10   14-13     14-13
   75     NR    NR    NR    Minnesota         4-12   11-15     11-15
  209     NR    NR    NR    Northwestern      0-16    5-21      3-21
15.252cain you thay, "unequivocal?"ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Mar 05 1991 15:2410
    >What did ole Clem say?
    
    Paraphrasing from memory:
    
    "It's a goddamned shame that these kids worked so hard and beat the
    #2 team in the country on their home floor only to have the game 
    stolen from them by three jackasses wearing striped shirts.  I don't
    know what they were thinking, except to prevent Ohio State from losing.
    If the Big10 and NCAA had any class, cared about fairness, they'd run
    these three stupid jackasses out of college basketball for good."
15.253Another Ellenberger violation?HBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughTue Mar 05 1991 16:1020
Norm Ellenberger, currently a full-time assistant at Indiana, has been
cited for alleged improper recruiting contacts while at UTEP. The NCAA is
investigating their program, where Ellenberger was a part-time coach from
86-90. NCAA rules bar part time coaches from recruiting off campus. The
NCAA report made public accused UTEP and Ellenberger with 2 prospective
recruits.

This is Ellenberger's second confrontation with the NCAA. He was fired at
New Mexico in 1979 after a grade-fixing scandal at that school.

Bobby Knight can probably deflect this while the status is still at the
level of allegations. If proven to be true, the school would have no
choice but to fire him. Also, if true, the NCAA should act like they did
in the Kentucky scandal and bar Ellenberger for some period of coaching.
If they are proven to be inaccurate, Knight and Indiana should make that
clear, since some investigations just fade away and one is left with a
notice that the allegations were made and not much fanfare when the
investigations disprove them.

TTom
15.254STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishTue Mar 05 1991 18:1618
    It sounds like another one of those petty-ass NCAA rules, it's a shame
    the NCAA doesn't hit the real violaters hard but instead go after these
    small violations.
    
    i.e. The hotel stuff at UNLV, free sneakers at school's, Steve Alford
    posing for a charity poster and a million other meaningless things.
    
    This is not in defense of IU because no violations have occured there
    but to go after a part-time coach who might have contacted a recruit
    during a legal time-period. Hell I'd even complain if this happened at
    North Carolina.  It's a little different than shipping thousands of 
    dollars to the father of a prospective recruit(Kentucky violation).
    
    It's about time for a separate orginazation outside the NCAA to begin
    to investigate these rule violations and for the NCAA to get rid of 
    some of these petty rules.
    
    Cap
15.255ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Mar 06 1991 14:5623
    Bob & Indiana could care less about Ellenberger's problems at UTEP
    cuz Bob brought him on with the explicit understanding that he'd done
    wrong prior to showing up at IU.  
    
    Bob has a career history featuring two thrusting prongs: 1) He does 
    things geek PR freaks tend not to like, such as hiring a coach with
    a troubled past, and, 2) he runs a_immaculate program, which is why
    his teams never feature high-priced centers and widebodies.
    
    If you care so much about rules violations write about UNLV, who
    recruit kids with SATs of 550 and criminal records who also happen to
    be great hoopsters no other univeristy (i.e., UCLA, Zona, etc.) cain
    touch, and if they do well they're paid upwards of a $500,000 per year
    and are illegally wired into mega real estate deals and retailing start
    ups.
    
    If the IRS investigated Tark, he'd not only not be coaching, he'd be
    doing time in the federal penintentary.
    
    Big diff between *scum* and giving a miscreant a second chance just to
    spite the geek freeks.
    
    Big10 Tom  
15.256third chance?HBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughWed Mar 06 1991 19:3915
I get the point about hiring the coach with a "troubled past". I
especially like it this is directed at PR freaks.

I get the point about UNLV. I missed the leap from SATs and paying
players to Tark should have a problem with IRS. Are you saying that he
too is receiving illegal - undeclared - compensation? Now, I'm not saying
that he might be not somehow criminally involved with some of this but I
don't know and haven't heard details of a tax problem. 

>    Big diff between *scum* and giving a miscreant a second chance just to
>    spite the geek freeks.

What if this is changed to third chance?

TTom
15.257SACT41::ROSSSome people call me Maurice...whoowooThu Mar 07 1991 11:2810
Purdue beat Ohio State last night 72-67, which should cause all sorts of
problems for the NCAA committee.   I can't prevent the cynical side of
me from thinking there's some sort of conspiracy going on to get as many
Big 10 schools into the tournament.   Each team is worth $250K to the
league... Purdue was out of it completely two weeks ago.. now they're
a win away {Northwestern, I think} from a pretty decent shot at a slot
in the tournament.

Ohio State hasn't exactly been dominating lately... They had won several
very close games in a row.  Hope they get things going again soon.
15.258CHIEFF::CHILDSI was testing the bounds of realityThu Mar 07 1991 15:258
I was thinking the conspiracy had more to do with Keady's recent personal
tragedy. The again Doug they did blow the first game against OSU so maybe
it's just the kids are coming of age. They certainly look cool last night
at crunch time. The pass to White off the trap in the corner was a beauty.
Wish ESPN had covered more of it...

mike
15.259Yeah, Purdue!FORTSC::MOKThu Mar 07 1991 22:49114
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-7-91)  NCAA
Date: 7 Mar 91 19:57:22 GMT
 
Who says Steve Smith has "no help"?  Did you know that Mark "Monty"
Montgomery leads the Big Ten in assists (he should, since Smith takes so
many shots) and is third in steals!!!  Let's not hear anymore whining
out of East Lansing... ;-)
 
Wednesday's Results:
 
#39 PURDUE 72, #8 Ohio State 67:  The Boilermakers boosted their
	stock tremendously for NCAA tourney consideration as they led most
	of this game and held the Buckeyes off down the stretch, before an
	ear-shattering 14,123 at Mackey Arena.  The keys to this game were
	OSU shot selection (again), as Purdue outshot the Buckeyes 60% to
	39% from the floor, and Matt Painter's defense against Jim Jackson.
	Also, another tremendously inconsistent officiating job by the refs,
	headed up by Ed Hightower.  Purdue got the benefit of the doubt in
	the first half, being whistled only 5 times to OSU's 11, but in the
	second half, Purdue had already committed 10 fouls by the 10:10
	mark, while OSU finally committed a 7th with 3:30 left.  The
	Boilers ended up with 15 in the second half to OSU's 10.  Both
	teams overcame these "consistencies" to put on a great show.  I
	understand ESPN picked up the final 1:30 of the game, so I hope you
	got to see it.  The teams traded hoops early, and then Purdue
	assumed a lead after the score was tied at 15, as they led
	20-15 after a couple of hoops by Chuckie White and Ian Stanback.
	OSU tied it up at 22 on a Chris Jent trey, and after Mark Baker
	tied the game again at 24, Purdue shot ahead 32-24 with 3:35 left in
	the first half.  The Buckeyes shaved the score to 32-31 with 1:22 to
	go on a Jim Jackson trey.  Baker hit two free throws with :04 left
	to send the teams to a 35-33 Purdue advantage at the break.  The
	Boilers led all of the first 14 minutes of the second half, jumping
	out to leads of 41-36 and 53-45, the latter with only 6:38 left.
	Over the next few minutes, the only thing Purdue had to show for
	itself was a White dunk.  Ohio State, on the other hand, scored 11
	points, and led 56-55.  The game see-sawed for a couple of
	possesions, and then Purdue went ahead and kept the lead.  Jimmy
	Oliver hit a huge three to give Purdue a 64-60 lead, and then the
	Boilers went up 68-63 with 1:18 to go.  Perry Carter then hit a free
	throw and missed the second (way short), but Chris Jent snared
	the board and whipped the ball to Jackson, who drained a three to
	cut the lead to just one, 68-67, with 1:14 still left.  Oliver
	and Linc Darner iced the game with free throws down the stretch, as
	Purdue held off the Buckeyes.  The Buckeyes have now not won in West
	Lafayette since 1985.  Oliver had a great game, scoring 27 points
	and hitting the big shots when they had to be hit.  Chuckie White
	celebrated his 23rd birthday with 21 points in an inspired second
	half.  Painter had 6 points and generally did one of the best jobs
	of the year by a Purdue guard running the offense.  The Boilers got
	a bunch of good shots in this game.  Jamaal Brown had a nice game
	with 14 points, tying Jackson for team honors.  Mark Baker had 11.
	Treg Lee and Perry Carter combined for only 17 points, but both
	helped OSU to a 36-25 rebound advantage, 28 of them in the second
	half!  I told Randy Ayers to "Beat Vegas" after the game.  He smiled
	nicely, as always...
 
#55 WISCONSIN 85, #33 Illinois 77:  The Badgers kept their
	tournament hopes alive as well by holding off the Illini after
	dominating most of the evening.  Or, as the Chicago Tribune put it
	this morning, "Illini turn sour up in Dairyland".  Four senior
	starters were honored in the final home game at the Fieldhouse.
	Wisconsin jumped out fairly quickly (both Deon Thomas and Andy Kpedi
	got into first half foul trouble), leading 15-11, 39-32, and finally
	46-34 at the break, as the Illini defense had a few lapses.  Both
	teams shot over 50%, so defense wasn't a highlight.  The Badgers
	increased the lead to 59-44 early in the second half, and led by 17
	with 14:24 to go.  Illinois reduced the lead to 76-70 with just
	1:12 to go, but the Badgers did not break.  With just the six point
	deficit and the ball, Rennie Clemons missed a three, and after some
	fouls, the Badgers made 7 of 8 at the foul line down the stretch.
	The Badgers had five players in double figures, led by  Willie
	Simms' 18 points.  Andy Kaufmann led Illinois with 19 points.  The
	Illini only went to the line four times, and two of those came on a
	technical whistled on Patrick Tompkins.  Pretty amazing in this era.
	11,189 in Madison making their NIT plans...
 
 
Tonight:
 
	#71 Minnesota at #2 INDIANA                 7:00 pm CST
	#48 Iowa at #201 NORTHWESTERN               7:00 pm SportsChannel
 
Saturday:
 
	#55  Wisconsin at #71 MINNESOTA             Noon     Big Ten/Raycom
	#29  Michigan State at #63 MICHIGAN         2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#201 Northwestern at #39 PURDUE             1:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#2  Indiana at #33 ILLINOIS                 11:00 am Big Ten/Raycom
	#8  Ohio State at #48 IOWA                   1:00 pm ABC (regional)
 
[End of Regular Season]
  
RATINGS/RECORDS:
 
  New    New    New   Old
Sagarin   AP    CNN   UPI   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ---   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    8      2     2     2    Ohio State       15-2    25-2      25-2
    2      3     4     7    Indiana          13-3    25-4      25-4
   33     26    28    NR    Illinois         11-6    21-9      20-9
   29     49    37    NR    Michigan State   10-7    17-10     17-10
   39     NR    NR    NR    Purdue            8-9    16-11     16-11
   55     NR    NR    NR    Wisconsin         8-9    14-13     13-12
   48     NR    NR    NR    Iowa              7-9    18-10     16-10
   63     NR    NR    NR    Michigan          7-10   14-13     14-13
   71     NR    NR    NR    Minnesota         4-12   11-15     11-15
  201     NR    NR    NR    Northwestern      0-16    5-21      3-21
15.260More ugliness in the Big TenNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 11 1991 16:3010
    What's Lou Henson's problem?  From the clips I saw, sure, Bob was being
    a poor winner, but given Henson's outburst I'd say Knight got the best
    of him and now firmly holds the upper hand.
    
    These guys truely hate each other guts, eh?  (Henson:  "He's nothing
    but a bully... I asked him to step outside with me...")
    
    glenn
    
15.261Last ThursdayFORTSC::MOKMon Mar 11 1991 17:0679
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-8-91)  NCAA
Date: 8 Mar 91 17:43:31 GMT
 
Thursday's Results:
 
#2  INDIANA 75, #71 Minnesota 59:  The Gophers played tough early,
	leading by as many as nine, but the Hoosiers' superior talent wore
	them down over the long haul.  Calbert Cheaney scored all of his 16
	points in the second half as the Hoosiers pulled away.  I'll try to
	relay more details as they become available.  My radio reception was
	terrible, and neither McPaper nor the Chicago Tribune had much on
	it today...
 
#48 Iowa 79, #201 NORTHWESTERN 76:  The Hawkeyes dodged a major
	league bullet last night, trailing by as many as 13 in the first
	half and by as many as six with seven minutes left before pulling one
	out at Welsh-Ryan Arena.  James Moses was instrumental in bringing
	Iowa back, hitting five three's in the game.  He hit a huge one in
	the final minutes which gave the Hawkeyes a lead they wouldn't
	relinquish, though NU did shave it to one at 77-76 and had the ball
	at the end, down three, after a missed Iowa 1-and-1.  Jim Zabel
	implored all of us to "squeeze your radios tight" in the last few
	minutes, and it worked.  He's going to have the "big one" during one
	of these cliffhangers...  Back to the game, Northwestern led 49-40
	at halftime before Iowa started to chip away.  The Hawkeyes pulled
	within 61-57 under the 10 minute mark, but were down six again,
	68-62, with 7:20 left, when 6'11" NU center Kevein Rankin fouled
	out.  This was a major blow, as the Wildcat offense then stagnated,
	scoring only two more points until the 0:31 mark of the game.  They
	almost won anyway.  Iowa took the lead finally at 69-68 on a Chris
	Street basket.  Pat Baldwin quickly put NU back up 70-69, but then a
	three by Moses and another Street hoop put Iowa up 74-70.  The lead
	became six at 76-70 with just 0:31 left when Todd Leslie and Don
	Brotz sandwiched threes around an Iowa free throw to cut the Iowa
	lead to just 77-76 (Zabel was going beserk by this time).  The Cats
	called a timeout after Brotz' three, but were assessed a technical
	since they had no timeouts left.  However, since there were only 5
	seconds left, it was the only strategy they had left.  Troy Skinner
	drained both FTs to make the score 79-76, and then Iowa passed the
	ball in.  A Hawkeye was immediately fouled (forgot who), but he
	bricked the free throw and NU had one last chance, but they may not
	even have gotten a shot off.  Zabel was cheering more than
	announcing at that point, so who knows.  Val Barnes twisted an ankle
	in the first half and sat out the second, making the win even more
	remarkable.  Moses had 29 points and James Winters 13 for Iowa.
	7,112 on hand in Evanston to see Northwestern lose another home game
	in frustrating fashion...
  
Saturday:
 
	#55  Wisconsin at #71 MINNESOTA             Noon CST Big Ten/Raycom
	#29  Michigan State at #63 MICHIGAN         2:00 pm  Big Ten/Raycom
	#201 Northwestern at #39 PURDUE             1:00 pm
 
Sunday:
 
	#2  Indiana at #33 ILLINOIS                 11:00 am Big Ten/Raycom
	#8  Ohio State at #48 IOWA                   1:00 pm ABC (regional)
 
[End of Regular Season]
 
RATINGS/RECORDS:
 
  New    New    New   Old
Sagarin   AP    CNN   UPI   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ---   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    8      2     2     2    Ohio State       15-2    25-2      25-2
    2      3     4     7    Indiana          14-3    26-4      26-4
   33     26    28    --    Illinois         11-6    21-9      20-9
   29     49    37    NR    Michigan State   10-7    17-10     17-10
   48     NR    NR    NR    Iowa              8-9    19-10     17-10
   39     NR    NR    NR    Purdue            8-9    16-11     16-11
   55     NR    NR    NR    Wisconsin         8-9    14-13     13-12
   63     NR    NR    NR    Michigan          7-10   14-13     14-13
   71     NR    NR    NR    Minnesota         4-13   11-16     11-16
  201     NR    NR    NR    Northwestern      0-17    5-22      3-22
15.262AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Northeastern! What a Team!!Mon Mar 11 1991 17:474
    	So MorT, what do you think of yet another shameful BobKnight
    episode.  You know Tark would never show up another coach like that.
    
    				/Don
15.263Last regular season updateFORTSC::MOKMon Mar 11 1991 18:2097
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-11-91)  NCAA
Date: 11 Mar 91 15:39:53 GMT
 
A productive weekend for the conference, as 5 teams were selected to the
Big Dance and two made the NIT.  Ohio State got a #1 seeding in the
Midwest, at Dayton, despite getting hammered at Iowa.  Indiana cruised
by Illinois and took the #2 spot in the Southeast at nearby Louisville
(I predicted those two).  Michigan State won at Michigan and took the #5
spot in the West at Tucson, while Michigan will travel to Colorado to
face the Buffaloes in the NIT on Wednesday (ESPN).  Iowa took the #7
spot in the Midwest at the nearby Metrodome in Minneapolis, Purdue
routed hapless Northwestern and nailed down the #7 spot in the East at
Cole Field House in College Park, Maryland, against Bill Cosby's Temple
Owls, and finally the Wisconsin Badgers will host Bowling Green
Wednesday night in Madison in the NIT.  I will issue a separate posting
on the antics which occurred after the IU-Illinois game between Bob
Knight and Lou Henson...  Northwestern became the first team to ever
finish 0-18 since the round robin format was began back in the early
1970's...
 
I will have tourney updates as the teams advance... 
 
Saturday:
 
#67 MINNESOTA 80, #60 Wisconsin 70:  The Gophers broke open a close
	game in the second half, building a 19-point lead with a 27-7 run 
	before Wisconsin got within nine late.  Rob Metcalf had a couple of
	big treys to get the run going.  Kevin Lynch led Minnesota with 18
	points in his collegiate swan-song while Willie Simms had 23 for
	Wisconsin.  Before this win, the Gophers only had two wins over
	Northwestern to show over the last 13 games.  16,622 at The Barn...
 
#26 Michigan State 66, #68 MICHIGAN 59:  Steve Smith scored 18
	points in the second half (24 for the game) as the Spartans held off
	the Wolverins before a packed house of 13,609 in Ann Arbor.
	Michigan hung in there in the first half despite 30% shooting and
	Eric Riley's 9+ minutes of pine-time due to foul trouble.  But, the
	Spartans were able to keep Michigan at bay in the second half though
	they could never put them away.  Demetrius Calip led Michigan with
	21 points...
 
#32 PURDUE 77, #204 Northwestern 48:  Purdue blew away from the
	Wildcats in the last 8 minutes of the first half and cruised to an
	easy victory before 14,123 at Mackey Arena.   Leading just 22-21,
	the Boilermakers put on a 14-4 run to close the first half to lead
	36-25, and began the second half with a spurt of 17-11 to go ahead
	53-36, and finished the game with a 24-12 run.  Jimmy Oliver, making
	a bid for first-team all-Big Ten, scored 26 points.  Kevin Rankin
	had 17 for the Wildcats, who have now lost 46 straight Big Ten road
	encounters and 22 straight Big Ten games...
 
 
Sunday:
 
#4  Indiana 70, #44 ILLINOIS 58:  The Hoosiers opened with an 11-0
	run, as it took Illinois six minutes to score, and IU basically
	cruised.  The Hoosiers led 16-2 before the Illini woke up, and saw
	the lead trimmed to 24-18.  But, IU closed the first half with a
	17-7 run and took a 41-25 lead to the lockerroom.  The Hoosiers led
	by 18 several times early in the second half, then the Illini cut
	the lead to 10-12 points and it seemed to stay that way until the
	2:30 mark, when Illinois cut the deficit to 63-56.  But, that's as
	close as the Illini got, as IU made the free throws down the stretch
	and put this game away.  Eric Anderson led IU with 20 points while
	Andy Kaufmann bulled his way to 21 for Illinois.  16,321 at the
	Assembly Hall in Champaign...
 
	#45 IOWA 80, #9 Ohio State 69:  The Buckeyes closed out the season
	on a very sour note, as the Hawkeyes beat them at their own game and
	earned an NCAA bid.  Iowa played a tremendous first half, blowing
	out to a 47-39 halftime advantage.  OSU got behind by as many as 14
	points in the second half, but closed to within four twice, at 69-65
	and 71-67, the latter with 2:05 left.  After Perry Carter stripped
	Acie Earl of the ball, the Buckeyes had a chance to get within one
	or two, but Earl forced Carter into a travel and Iowa salted the
	game away at the stripe.  Rodell Davis led Iowa with 19 points,
	while Jim Jackson had 24 for OSU.  15,500 rowdy ones at
	Carver-Hawkeye Arena...
  
RATINGS/FINAL STANDINGS:
 
  New    Old    New
Sagarin   AP    CNN   Post   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ----   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    9      2     5     #1    Ohio State       15-3    25-3      25-3
    4      3     3     #2    Indiana          15-3    27-4      27-4
   44     26    45     --    Illinois         11-7    21-10     20-10
   26     49    32     #5    Michigan State   11-7    18-10     18-10
   45     NR    37     #7    Iowa              9-9    20-10     18-10
   32     NR    NR     #7    Purdue            9-9    17-11     17-11
   60     NR    NR     NIT   Wisconsin         8-10   14-14     13-13
   68     NR    NR     NIT   Michigan          7-11   14-14     14-14
   67     NR    NR     --    Minnesota         5-13   12-16     12-16
  204     NR    NR     --    Northwestern      0-18    5-23      3-23
15.264QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Mar 11 1991 18:435
What happened re: Knight and Henson? And When...

I didn't hear about anything on Sports news.

Mike JN
15.265Knight: classless; Henson: worseHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe crux of the biscuitMon Mar 11 1991 19:3910
    Knight apparently got his hands on some Illinois self-promotional hype,
    and sarcastically belittled the selections it made for Big 10 XXX of
    year.  Not so bad, even though most adults could have avoided it.
    
    Henson responded by  whining about Knight's actions, and tried to get
    the state of Illinois to close ranks around him.  ESPN speculated that
    he was doing this with an eye toward recruiting as Knight has pulled
    some plums from Ill. recently.
    
    Dan
15.266ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Mar 12 1991 18:0454
    >what do you think of yet another shameful BobKnight episode...
    
    Bob ain't NEVER done anything wrong or shameful.  He has a clean 
    slate.
    
    >You know Tark would never show up another coach like that.
    
    Cuz Tark is in the same class as Lou-do: Low class, as in cheating
    for competitive advantage.
    
    According to inside accounts, here's what happened:
    
    Lou-do approached Bob in the runway outside the locker rooms and
    offered to shake His hand.  Bob told him he was a cheater and refused
    Lou-cheat-ass' extended hand, turned and went into the visitor's
    locker room.  Lou, enraged at somebody showing enough honor & honesty
    to call a cheat a cheat and to treat him accordingly, then proceeded
    to pound on the locked Indiana door and to scream obscenities through
    the door and for Bob to come out and fight.  Bob declined, perhaps
    unwisely, to come out and capitalize on a once-in-a-lifetime golden
    opportunity to kick a lying cheat-ass' ass.  Then, in the press room,
    Bob, understandably angry from the threats and obscenities, borrowed
    a pad and paper from a reporter and proceeded to mock Lou's infamous
    press conference from last year where he'd drawn a map of the midwest
    with arrows thrusting into Illinois from Iowa and Indiana (to explain
    to the NCAA investigators why he ran such a scuzbag cheaty program) - 
    Bob drew Indiana thrusting a big thick black arrow thrusting into
    Illinois from Hoosierland and, speaking in a whiney voice, mocked Lou
    by putting on a_explanation about how the undermanned Hoosiers managed
    to beat such a_awesome program as the one extolled in the SID's brochure 
    which failed to mention cheating and probation.  Bob then explained
    that a bullshit brochre like the one he was brandishing "wore his
    ass out" and that he understood that a troubled program like Illinois'
    "needed help" and that "I'd like to help this program solve their
    problems but I'm too busy right now, I've got a NCAA tourney to go
    to."
          
    Then Lou-do got up and did his whiney routine, falsely implying that 
    it's bullying to refuse to shake a known liar's hand, or to come out
    and kick a known cheat's ass.
    
    I disagree with these false assertions.  I point out that Lou commands
    the undying disrespect of several other honest coach's who've recruited
    against the high-paying Lou-do, Dr. Malpractice and Digger Phelps among
    them.  
    
    This almost tops the time Bob did a 20 minute interview on his TV show 
    with a jackass dressed up as a Purdue cheerleader wherein he queried
    Ms. Mule on the Boilermaker hoops program and campus life in West Lafayette.
    
    Ha haa.  Way to go Bob!  Chump the old cheat-ass!  Give him his just
    disrespect.  In Lou's face !!  Haa.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.267Many similaritiesSHALOT::MEDVIDwild but not lostTue Mar 12 1991 18:1510
    From what I've read, this seems like the old Chuck Noll/Sam Wyche
    arguement.  Notice the similarities between Noll and Knight, two
    tell-it-like-it-is winners; notice the similarities between Wyche and
    Henson, two crybaby losers.
    
    Like Noll said when Wyche whined about not getting a handshake: "I
    don't shake the hands of people I don't like; it's hypocritical. 
    Winners let it go. Losers cry about it."  End of press conference.
    
    	--dan'l
15.268I thought there were no cheat-asses in the BIG10?AXIS::ROBICHAUDGo Northeastern! What a Team!!Tue Mar 12 1991 18:201
    
15.269proper perspective...ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYSodomWDavisDFennerJWorthyACChrisTue Mar 12 1991 18:2111
    Thank you, dan'l.  Let's look at this situation from the perspective
    of Bob.  Put yourself in *Bob's* shoes: If you were standing in a 
    dark alley, and a whorish AIDS victim came up to you - open running
    puss sores in the forehaid, damp spots on her dress from open leisions,
    the stench of dried scab all about her - and she demanded that you let
    her plunge her long mottled tongue down your throat by way of a good-bye
    kiss...
    
    Is it wrong for you to decline?
    
    Big10 Tom
15.270Bob was quite the comedian to Henson's fool...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 12 1991 18:4410
    I liked the part when a sarcastic Bob referred to the obvious "NCAA
    conspiracy" that had staked out and snared poor Henson...
    
    Henson comes off a lot like one of them TV preachers, with the whiny
    twang in his voice that barely masks the underlying insincerity.  Maybe
    there's a place for him in the ACC?
    
    glenn
     
15.271Let's get the parameters before I decideSACT41::ROSSBlub... blub.. blubTue Mar 12 1991 18:536
>    her plunge her long mottled tongue down your throat by way of a good-bye
>    kiss...
>    
>    Is it wrong for you to decline?

How many lesions and how far down my throat?
15.273HelpRAVEN1::B_ADAMSHotlanta is getting warmer!Tue Mar 12 1991 20:328
    
    Cain someone pluz tell me where this dude's place on the court is?
    
    Jim Jackson..OSU
    
    Thanks,
    
    B.A.
15.274QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Tue Mar 12 1991 20:497
When I saw him he was playing Forward, but the Associated Press named
him to the All America Second Team as a Guard.

????  if you are thinking about him for the Contest, check with Doug,
since he's running it for us; maybe Jimmy can be an either/or.

Mike JN
15.275ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYSodomWDavisFennerWorthyACChrisWed Mar 13 1991 18:108
    >Knight: classless;
    
    Of course, what Dan's saying here is that in order to be "classy"
    one must accord respect to a known cheat.  Not surprising, coming 
    from Dan SnideAir, a fellow who's made public impassioned pleas for
    racial segregation and lowered academic standards, eh?
    
    Big10 Tom
15.276ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYACCrisp: MaleHumanAlumnusSlutWed Mar 13 1991 18:4911
    
    >in order to be "classy" one must accord respect to a known cheat.
    
    Didn't think a it when I wrote this, but you're setting us up.  Right
    now we're celebrating the 1st anniversary of the rigged contest in
    which you were caught cheating.  Ergo, to be "classy," we must accord
    you respect and courtesy.  
    
    LouHenson,JimValvano,NormStewart,EddieSutton,JohnWooden,DanSnideAir
    
    Big10 Tom
15.277Ah, go make up another story about Knight and the RussiansHOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe crux of the biscuitWed Mar 13 1991 20:589
    >...which you were caught cheating. 
    
    *I* was caught cheating?!  Ah yes, hysterical, historical revision
    time, I guess.
    
    It was found that I won honestly and deservedly, and I magnanimously
    gave a ticket to the second place finisher.
    
    Dan
15.278RECURS::WAHLSemper GumbyThu Mar 14 1991 15:509
    I'm confused.  I know that's not hard to do, but nevertheless, I
    don't understand what Knight's problem is.  (That is, what
    specific problem Knight has with Henson.)  How did Henson 
    allegedly cheat, and whose ass was cheated?
    
    Maybe I should just stick to baseball.  It's easier to understand
    Rickey Henderson and Darryl Strawberry than these guys.
    
    Dave W.
15.279HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe crux of the biscuitThu Mar 14 1991 18:1411
    Re: .-1 Henson as cheater
    
    Illinois has been placed on probation for two years for "lack of
    institutional control".  A lot of wrongs going on, one of which was an
    offer of $80,000 and a Chevy Blazer to two recruits, one of whom is
    currently an Illini (Thomas) whom admitted it on tape.
    
    Knight and Henson have both been reprimanded by the Big 10 for
    embarrassing the conference.
    
    Dan
15.280A no big deal cheat ass, one would supposeSHALOT::HUNTSwatch dogs and Diet Coke headsThu Mar 14 1991 19:027
 Keep in mind that this same Lou Henson whom our fabled MrT is now calling
 a "cheat ass" is the same Lou Henson whose program's violations were also
 called "no big deal" by that same MrT.
 
 Cake and eat it, I suspect (sigh) once again ...
 
 Bob Hunt
15.281RECURS::WAHLSemper GumbyFri Mar 15 1991 04:435
    $80K and a car for playing roundball?  *I* wouldn't shake his hand,
    either.  If that's "poor judgement", I'd hate to see what a real
    crime is.
    
    Dave W.
15.282J.Brown?RAVEN1::B_ADAMSHotlanta is getting warmer!Mon Mar 18 1991 18:339
    
    	Help...
    
    	How many points did Jammel Brown have in the second game this
    weekend?
    
    Thx...
    
    B.A.
15.283Why shouldn't they pay? Very good question ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 18 1991 19:2021
    Gotta admit I'm really enjoying the new adidas ads.  So far I've seen
    BobKnight in a couple of different ones and a John McEnroe look-alike
    smashing his racket whilst having at the linesman.  The amazing part is
    they're actually dealing with some real meaty arguments, like poor
    sportsmanship and the recent NCAA decision to cut hoops scholarships.
    
    Bob sez he's always looking for other/better ways and he suggests they
    start charging the media to attend NCAA events to pay for the drop in
    scholarships.  (Around 600 kids will not get scholarships thanks to the
    recent ridiculous NCAA convention during which they put on a great
    media hype show whilst dealing with NONE of the serious issues facing
    college athletics.)
    
    Anyways all I can say is "AMEN, BOB.".  At the ACC Tournament alone I
    counted five (5) tables running the length of the court that were
    strictly for the media.  They all got in for zilch.  (The tourney tix
    ran ya $105 per, *if* you were lucky enough to have the opportunity to
    buy them.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.284Yeah, but you're forgetting ...SHALOT::HUNTSwatch dogs and Diet Coke headsMon Mar 18 1991 20:0511
 You're forgetting again, Soup, that Bob Knight needs the media every bit
 as much as they need him.
 
 Asking the media to pay for tickets to cover a sports event would be like
 us forcing Computerworld to pay to see our newest VAX.   Guarantee ya that
 they'd go over to IBM instead for the free hors d'oeuvres and open bar.
 
 You have this anti-media thing nailed down solid, don'tcha ???   Both Dean
 and Bob would be very proud of ya.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.285QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Mon Mar 18 1991 20:065
I haven't caught many of the commercials, I'm usually either watching in
a Sports Bar, where you can't hear anything anyway, or at home with the
sound turned down so there's not all that squeaking  ;'D

Mike JN
15.286ISLNDS::WASKOMMon Mar 18 1991 20:2214
    The new Adidas ad, with the multiple shots of folks doing sports
    "no-no's", is excellent.  It even made my 17-year old sit up and
    say "That's terrific".  Yes, that is John McEnroe throwing a tantrum
    on the tennis court.  A shot of a steroids container with the over-dub
    "Sports isn't about gimmicks".  A shot of a stock car driver switching
    hats during the post-race interview and the over-dub "Sports isn't
    about commercialism".  Final shot is a casket and flowers, over-dubbed
    with "Sports shouldn't be (or aren't, I've forgotten) life and death" 
    [why am I reminded of British soccer games?].  Final comment is 
    something to the effect of "Let's get back to the basics of sport".
    
    Brings up a lot of the more serious issues that we cover in here.
    
    A&W
15.287RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOLet's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN!Mon Mar 18 1991 20:359
    While these new ads are nice, I don't remember Addidas doing anything
    about their infamous "Addidas Troop" line of 'sports' accessories -
    which were basically clothes for gangs.  They didn't give a flying
    blank at a rolling doughnut then, did they?
    
    Oh, and A&W, you may have thought about British soccer cause there's a
    small shot of a riot at a British soccer game in the ad.
    
    JD
15.288Compared w/ most endorsements, Knight did himself proudNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 18 1991 20:5429
    Only problem with the Adidas ad might be that by the end, where I've 
    agreed with everything they've said, I'm asking myself: "They're
    right.  What do I need that new $75 pair of Adidas for?"  Adidas might 
    not be hyping their product as much as the others, but their 
    top-of-the-line isn't any more essential to sport than the next guy's.
    
    I think Knight made his point.  The closing line about the media was
    *A JOKE*.  Given Bob's history with the media and his dead-pan
    delivery, I thought it was very funny the first time I saw it.  And
    while Knight might realize that the media serves a purpose and he needs
    it, he's also smart enough to know that his criticisms of it aren't
    going to hurt him or his program.  That's the beauty of it: if he
    combats the media and keeps it honest, they'll only keep coming back
    for more.  As long as he stays clean, he's a curmudgeon, a character, 
    a constant in college basketball.  Everybody wins...
    
    As an example, I liked Knight's treatment this weekend of the 
    reporter who kept pestering him about whether he'd make adjustments 
    in response to Florida State's "athleticism".  Instead of sputtering 
    some nonsensical cliches, he kept the guy at bay by saying that he 
    didn't know what he meant, that basketball is an athletic game, an 
    athletic competition, so FSU's "athleticism" didn't concern him more
    than any other team's.  It was Knight at his most difficult, but a
    straightforward Knight you could respect for giving a stupid, 
    loaded question the reaction it deserved.
    
    glenn
        
15.289RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOLet's go Seton Hall, SJU, UCONN!Tue Mar 19 1991 13:326
    Glenn,
    
    Right on.  I found Knight's media comment to be pretty funny.  IMO,
    'athleticism' is one of those 'veiled' comments.  
    
    JD
15.290ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYACCrisp: MaleHumanAlumnusSlutTue Mar 19 1991 18:2322
    > -< Ah, go make up another story about Knight and the Russians >-
    
    Given your wanton wholesale disregard for Factual Reality, we'll
    just "forget" these established facts:
     
    1. Indiana's squad left the floor only after the Russians did.
    2. The Russians left after the official went over to the scorer's
       table and officially declared the game over, forfeited by Indiana
       per the 3 bench technical rule (Bob drew 3 bench TFs).
    3. The USAA sent Bob a letter apologizing for the offical's actions.
    
    We'll just "pretend" that Bob got sore and yanked his squad from the
    floor, and never mind the fact that 15,000 people (Dick Vitale among
    them) thought they saw what's described above.  Let's just call it
    a mass hallucination and remind ourselves that the needs of Bob myth-
    building is better served by the story that he quit the game.
    
    > -< Let's go Seton Hall, SJU, UConn! >-
    
    And sports ain't about regional bias, neither, is it, JD?
    
    Big10 Tom
15.291BEast loyalty in yo face!!!!!! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Wed Mar 20 1991 00:059
    BTTom,
    re: regional bias comment....
    
    Take a *** pill!!!
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
15.292All-American/All-Big TenFORTSC::MOKWed Mar 20 1991 21:4043
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-12-91)  NCAA
Date: 12 Mar 91 17:29:49 GMT
 
The AP All-American team included Jim Jackson of Ohio State and Steve
Smith of Michigan State on it's second team, while Indiana's Calbert
Cheaney made the third team.  Honorable mention included:  Damon Bailey
of Indiana (c'mon), Treg Lee of Ohio State, Kevin Lynch of Minnesota
(double c'mon).  No Jimmy Oliver of Purdue, Eric Anderson of IU, or
Demetrius Calip of Michigan, three players which would supplant Bailey
and Lynch on most any Midwestern team.
 
Then, the AP All-Big Ten was announced:
 
First Team:  Jackson, Smith, Cheaney, Oliver, Patrick Tompkins (Wis)
 
Second Team: Lynch, Calip, Andy Kaufmann (Ill), Eric Anderson (Ind), and
			 Acie Earl (Iowa).  No Bailey!
 
I didn't catch the third team, but Randy Ayers of OSU was named Coach of
the Year and Damon Bailey was named Frosh of the Year.  The announcer
did not list a Player of the Year, but if they chose one, I assume it
was Jackson.

[....]

RATINGS/RECORDS:  (IU ended up 3rd in UPI, OSU 5th and MSU 22nd)
 
  New    New    New
Sagarin   AP    CNN   Post   School         Big Ten  Overall  vs. Div I
-------   --    ---   ----   ------         -------  -------  ---------
 
    9      5     5     #1    Ohio State       15-3    25-3      25-3
    4      3     3     #2    Indiana          15-3    27-4      27-4
   44     37    45!    --    Illinois         11-7    21-10     20-10
   26     35    32     #5    Michigan State   11-7    18-10     18-10
   45     29!   37     #7    Iowa              9-9    20-10     18-10
   32     NR!   NR!    #7    Purdue            9-9    17-11     17-11
   60     NR    NR     NIT   Wisconsin         8-10   14-14     13-13
   68     NR    NR     NIT   Michigan          7-11   14-14     14-14
   67     NR    NR     --    Minnesota         5-13   12-16     12-16
  204     NR    NR     --    Northwestern      0-18    5-23      3-23
15.293Last WedFORTSC::MOKWed Mar 20 1991 21:4138
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-14-91)  NCAA
Date: 14 Mar 91 23:14:20 GMT
 
Wednesday's Results in the NIT:
 
	#34 COLORADO 71, #68 Michigan 64:   The Wolverines led by only six
	points at halftime, even though the Buffaloes shot an incredibly bad
	14% from the field, and it killed them, as the Buffs got hot in the
	second half and pulled away from Michigan in the final couple
	minutes.  Shaun Vandiver was a man, as he and Demetrius Calip led
	their respective teams in scoring.  A tough assignment for Michigan
	out in Boulder.  Colorado moves on in the NIT, while Michigan's
	season ends at 14-15, their first losing one since the 8-19 team of
	1982.  Vandiver scored 17 of his 27 points in the second half, as
	the Buffaloes cam back from a 25-19 halftime deficit.  They took
	their first second-half lead at 42-41 with 10:49 left, though the
	game see-sawed and was in doubt until the final minute...
 
	#60 WISCONSIN 87, #78 Bowling Green 79 (OT):  The Badgers had their
	hands full with the Falcons from Ohio, a team which has beaten
	Michigan State each of the last two seasons.  Willie Simms scored a
	career-high 31 point, six of them in the second session.  Bowling
	Green (17-13) had tied the game at the end of regulation on a
	10-footer by Ed Colbert in this exciting game...
 
Big Ten NCAA lineup: 
 
	#45 IOWA 76, #19 East Tennessee State (28-5) 73:  More details
	tomorrow morning, but the Hawkeyes staved off ETSU with two FTs with
	2.8 seconds remaining.  Iowa trailed by as many as 10 in the first
	half.  Rodell Davis made a huge steal, and an ensuing basket gave
	Iowa a 74-70 lead, this very late in the game.  ETSU hit a three to
	make things interesting...
                    
[....]

15.294Last ThurFORTSC::MOKWed Mar 20 1991 21:4378
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-15-91)  NCAA
Date: 15 Mar 91 20:57:49 GMT
 
[....]
    
Big Ten NCAA lineup:
  
Thursday's Results:
 
Midwest Region, Minneapolis:
 
#45 IOWA (21-10) 76, #19 East Tennessee State (28-5) 73:  Rodell
	Davis' steal on the press and hoop gave Iowa a 74-70 lead which
	turned out to be just enough.  The Hawkeyes trailed by 10 points in
	the first half to the depleted ETSU team, but came back and held on.
	ETSU still had a four point lead of 37-33 at halftime.  Troy Skinner
	was perfect from the field and scored 14 points, along with James
	Moses.  Acie Earl had 18.  The Hawkeyes ruled the boards 39-26,
	before 25,759 at the HumpDome...
 
East Region, College Park:
 
#35 Temple (22-9) 80, #32 PURDUE (17-12) 63:  The Owls, who normally
	struggle offensively with a 43% field goal percentage and a scoring
	average under 70 points, blistered the Maryland nets to the tune of
	65% (30 of 46) and pulled away from Purdue.  After a 9-8 Purdue
	lead, the Owls never trailed.  From a 13-13 tie, they blew out to
	27-18, 31-20, and 37-27 at the break.  Temple shot 69% in the first
	half (15-22).  Purdue looked to turn the tide early in the second
	half, scoring the half's first 8 points to close to 37-35.  But a
	Temple trey, duece, and trey produced 8 consecutive points of it's
	own (45-35) and the closest Purdue ever got again was five twice, at
	45-40 and 68-63, with 2:11 left.  The Owls biggest lead (before the
	final margin) was at 62-49.  Two Purdue treys had brought the
	Boilers within 68-63, one of them by Travis Trice.  But, Temple just
	could not miss in this game, and scored the game's final 12 points.
	Mik Kilgore, a 6'8", 210 pound forward who roams the perimeter, was
	just too much to handle, scoring 25 points on 8 of 11 shooting from
	the field and a perfect 6 of 6 from the stripe.  He was 3 of 4 from
	three-point land, even though he's only a 39% shooter from that
	distance normally.  Temple was 6 of 10 from that range overall.  The
	four starters besides Mark Macon, who scored 19 but was not
	dominant, were 23 of 32 from the floor (72%).  Jimmy Oliver had 21
	points for Purdue (the only one in double figures), but was only 8
	of 19 from the floor.  Chuckie White had 13 boards but was terrible
	on offense, scoring only 7 points.  John Chaney said, "You can only
	hope and dream for a night like this.  We did a good job of getting
	the ball to the principal people on the floor, and hitting the A, B,
	C shots."  Gene Keady said, "Their quickness was a major factor".
	The Owls played a great game and will now face Dick Tarrant and the
	Richmond Spiders.  Good luck...  13,386 at Cole Field House...
 
Southeast Region, Louisville:
 
#2  INDIANA (28-4) 79, #105 Coastal Carolina (24-8) 69:  In the
	first half, Coastal Carolina looked like the worst team which ever
	played in the NCAA tournament.  In the end, Indiana was relieved to
	get a tough victory.  Brian Penny, a guard, put on one of the
	greatest shooting displays in NCAA tourney history, nailing 13 of 15
	fielders (5 of 6 from trifecta land), and nearly brought the
	Chanticleers (a stud rooster) back from the 46-30 halftime deficit.
	Actually, they were down by just three with just over two minutes to
	go, with the ball, but Eddie Lesaine, who scored only 5 points, took
	an ill-advised three with no rebounders under the hoop, and IU
	grabbed the carrom and salted the game away at the stripe (why
	didn't they let Penny shoot?!?).  Indiana committed only 2 second
	half fouls, prompting the CCU coach to comment, "Indiana University
	plays the cleanest defense in the country", in a sarcastic tone.
	Eric Anderson led IU with 22 points, while Penny finished with a
	career-high 34 points.  IU repeatedly stole errant Chanticleer
	passes in the first half and scored on the break.  Damon Bailey hit
	a crucial three after Lesaine's miss, before a partisan crowd of
	18,217 at Freedom Hall...
 
[....]

15.295Last Fri - SunFORTSC::MOKWed Mar 20 1991 21:43120
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-18-91)  NCAA
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1991 20:21:24 GMT

Friday's NCAA Results:
 
West Region, Tucson:
 
#26 MICHIGAN STATE (19-10) vs. #66 Wisconsin-GB (24-7):  A Steve Smith
	15-foot J at the horn gave the Spartans a tough win over the Phoenix
	of UWGB.  The leading scorer for UWGB, Tony Bennett, was held to
	just 9 points, perhaps due to some foul trouble.  State trailed much
	of the game.  Smith ended up with 19 points, while Dean Vander Plas
	led the team from Titletown with 17 points, before 13,367 at
	gArY's hOuSe...
 
Midwest Region, Dayton:
 
#9  OHIO STATE (26-3) 97, #154 Towson State (19-11) 86:  OSU ended
	it's two-game losing skid with a win over TSU.  The Buckeyes built
	an 18-point second half lead (after being ahead 45-37 at the break),
	but Towson got within 75-70 with only 5:33 left.  Ohio State then
	began to pull away again with a 7-2 spurt.  Towson played OSU pretty
	tough in this game.  Jim Jackson led the Buckeyes with 24
	points, before a partisan crowd of 13,055 at the UD Arena... 
 
Saturday's Results:
 
Midwest Region, Minneapolis:
 
#5  Duke (28-7) 85, #45 IOWA (21-11) 70:  The Blue Devils dismantled the
	vaunted Iowa press with passes over the top and easy hoops to blow out
	the Hawkeyes.  The first half was fairly close up to the point when
	Duke led 30-26, but they then had a 14-3 run to close the half and led
	44-29 at the break.  The lead ballooned to 53-33 before Iowa made a
	comeback, getting as close as 12 points, but Duke was never in
	danger.  Duke is such a well-coached team.  Christian Laettner led
	the scoring for the ACC team with 19 points, while James Moses had
	23 for the Hawkeyes.  28,114 at the Metrodome up north, including
	lots of Hawkeye backers...
 
Southeast Region, Louisville:
 
#4  INDIANA (29-4) 82, #46 Florida State (21-11) 60:  Florida State played
	a great first half and a horrid second half, as a 6-point haltime lead
	turned into a 22-point loss.  The 'Noles led by 11, at 36-25, late
	in the first half, and the aroma of upset was in the air.  But, IU
	closed the first half with a 7-2 run, including a trey in the waning
	seconds, and opened with a 21-2 second half run (28-4 in all), to build
	a 53-40 lead, and the game was over.  The Hoosiers made 3 treys
	during the second half surge.  FSU got into some foul trouble as
	well, which didn't help them.  Calbert Cheaney led IU with 24
	points, while Douglas Edwards had 18 points and 14 boards for Pat
	Kennedy's crew, before 18,946 partisan IU supporters at Freedom
	Hall...
  
Sunday's Results:
 
West Region, Tucson:
 
#43 Utah (30-3) 85, #26 MICHIGAN STATE 84 (19-11) (2OT):  In a great game
	marred by some really assine switching by CBS (do those buffoons really
	think we would rather listen to Nance, Packer, and dough-boy Francesa
	instead of watching one of two cliffhangers in progress?), it seemed
	as though the Spartans had the "luck of the green" going for them,
	turning apparent defeat into extra sessions twice, using some
	strange circumstances.  This game was closely contested from the
	opening tipoff, as both teams seemed evenly matched.  State led
	33-29 at halftime, though both teams led the half, and the second
	half remained a see-saw affair.  The Spartans appeared dead, down
	64-60 with only about 30 seconds left in regulation, when a bizarre
	drive and hoop by Matt Steigenga (I think) and foul by Utah on Steve
	Smith resulted in a four-point play (the whistle blew as Steigenga
	was still driving, so I really don't know how the hoop could have
	counted).  Smith made both FTs, and the teams went to OT after Utah
	missed a trey.  Utah led the first OT with something like 6.6
	seconds to go when Mike Peplowski missed a bunny put-back, but was
	fouled.  He bricked both FTs, but the second one went right to Jon
	Zulauf, who put in the carrom and sent the game to a second OT.  The
	luck finally ran out for State in OT-2, though, as the Utes built a
	four-point lead and withstood Smith's last trey, as MSU could not
	stop the clock and Utah simply held the ball out of bounds.  Smith
	had 28 points, and Josh Grant 29 for Utah, as Rick Majerus does
	another great coaching job at Utah.  He called it, "the best
	game I've probably ever been involved in in my life".  13,497 antsy
	fans at the McKale Center, who were waiting for the Vegas-G'town
	game to start...
 
Midwest Region, Dayton:
 
#9  OHIO STATE (27-3) 65, #23 Georgia Tech (17-13) 61:  The Buckeyes
	were lucky to win this game, as the Jackets blew several
	opportunities to tie or reduce the lead when down by just 2 or 3 for
	what seemed like an eternity down the stretch.  Perry Carter scored
	19 points and grabbed 18 boards in a great effort.  Kenny Anderson
	just couldn't buy a hoop, shooting a miserable 8 of 28 and missing
	countless shots down the stretch.  The Buckeyes saw their 8-point
	halftime advantage, which went to 10 with nine minutes to go,
	dwindle to just two at 58-56 with only :32 left.  The Buckeyes
	managed to get the important boards and make the FTs when it
	counted, finally.  Many of Anderson's misses were wide-open.  Both
	teams shot an identical .369 from the floor (24 of 65), and the game
	had 94 rebounds because of the terrible shooting (OSU had 50).
	Anderson still led Tech with 25 points, while Jim Jackson was held
	to 16 on 5 of 17 shooting, before 13,055 in Dayton...
 
Thursday Night:
 
	Southeast Regional, Charlotte Coliseum:
 
	#4 INDIANA (29-4) vs. #7 Kansas (24-7)
 
Friday Night:
 
	Midwest Regional, Pontiac Silverdome:
 
	#9 OHIO STATE (27-3) vs. #39 St. John's (22-8)

[....]

15.296Saying nice things about BobSHALOT::MEDVIDwild but not lostThu Mar 21 1991 13:4322
    A few days ago, a Charlotte Observer sports columnist wrote a column in
    which he found it hard to say anything nice about Bob Knight.  So
    people wrote and faxed things to him.  Here are some highlights of
    today's column:
    
    "There are three nice things to say about Bobby Knight.  And they're
    hanging in Assembly Hall.  How many nice things does Dean Smith have?
    One?"
    
    "Bobby Knight embarrassed our school and our state and didn't act like
    a class guy.  But that's Bobby Knight.  And if Indiana beats Kansas,
    they'll beat Arkansas.  Bet?  You want to bet?  I can't bet money. 
    Lunch." - Kendall Gill
    
    "There's the good and there's the bad about Bobby Knight.  I'm trying
    to be as vague as possible." - Steve Scheffler
    
    "Bobby Knight is thoughtful, loyal and considerate" - Quinn Buckner
    
    (Knight's reply to Buckner's statement: "What was he on?")
    
    	--dan'l
15.297another reason why he's the best AGNT99::CHILDSBaseball = Hi-Bore-Nation Season ;^(Thu Mar 21 1991 14:0512
 How about Knight's classic yesterday? There was a press conference scheduled
 at X-hour. Knight shows up about 12 minutes late. He then explains that the
 NCAA has a rule which states that all games must start by 10 pm EST and his
 game saturday nite started at 10:12 pm so he figured his watch must be off
 12 minutes so he was just adding that much time to his watch so he would be
 in time with the rest of the univere....


 hahahahahaaahahahaha

 mike
15.298KnightismsSHALOT::MEDVIDwild but not lostThu Mar 21 1991 14:2111
    As that press conference continued, he had some other good ones.
    
    The camera lights were bright and shining in his eyes.  He put his hand
    to his head and covered his eys, squinting, and said: "You'd have a
    hard time catching a bly ball in here."
    
    Knight on Kansas coach Roy Williams: "He coaches well and he is as
    impressive as any coach I've seen.  He and the boy at Duke, I never
    could pronounce that SOB's name, have done a great job."
    
    	--dan'l
15.299SACT41::ROSSBobKnight &gt; DeanSmithThu Mar 21 1991 14:322
That's the biggest difference between Bob and Dean.   Bob's real, Dean's 
a cipher.
15.300I'm not a member of either Jihad, but this is silly EARRTH::BROOKSIn memorium : Al Cote ...Thu Mar 21 1991 15:326
    Bob mentioned Coach K at Duke. 
    
    talk about taking the pipe ! How many titles has Duke hauled in anyhow,
    out of how many Final Four trips ? And how bad were the beatings ?
    
    Doc
15.301It's the Man, not the menSHALOT::MEDVIDwild but not lostThu Mar 21 1991 16:0710
    Duke has taken the pipe in the final four, yes.  But, in my opinion, K
    has coached them to that point whereas the talent that Smith has
    recruited is what got them to the dance so many times.  
    
    Just my opinion, mind you, but a very valid one.  UNC has been loaded,
    dripping, listing with talent over the years and goes home early just
    about every year.  Duke has had one or two stars and a supporting cast
    that K manages to take pretty darn far...three straight final fours.
    
    	--dan'l
15.302IU lostFORTSC::MOKFri Mar 22 1991 19:3744
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: Big Ten UPDATE (3-22-91)  NCAA
Date: 22 Mar 91 15:16:27 GMT
 
Thursday Night's Result: 
 
Southeast Regional, Charlotte Coliseum:
 
#7  Kansas 83 (25-7), #4 INDIANA (29-5) 65:  This was simply a
	good, old-fashioned butt-whipping by Roy Williams' Jayhawks,
	following the same thing inflicted on Alabama by Arkansas.  This
	one began early, as the Jayhawks raced out 12-2, 16-4, 21-4, and
	26-6 before IU knew what it them.  The Hoosiers then righted
	themselves and cut the huge lead down to 28-17 with about 8 minutes
	to go in the half.  The lead remained in the 11-15 point range then
	until late in the half, when KU blew out to a 49-27 halftime
	advantage.  They slightly broadened the lead during the first
	portion of the second half, to 60-37, before IU mounted a comeback
	which saw them get as close as 13 points, but that was it.  The
	first time the team pulled within 14 was at 68-54 with about 6
	minutes to go.  It was 74-61 under the five minute mark when the
	Jayhawks ran off 4 points to lead 78-61, and coasted home with free
	throws.  Actually, the outcome probably could have been much worse if
	KU had made their free throws during the bulk of the second half.
	At one point, they were only 6 of 14 and had missed 3 or 4
	consecutive front ends of bonuses.  This was probably the only
	thing which allowed IU to remain within shouting distance.  Kansas
	dominated every other aspect of this game, in what some might
	consider a shocking result.  Roy Williams has to be given
	all the credit for devising a great game plan, as Kansas repeatedly
	worked for easy shots in the paint against IU's admittedly weak
	inside game.  The guards lit it up from outside early as well, which
	always helps open things up.  A most-impressive showing to be sure
	from this Big Eight power, setting up a very interesting contrast in
	styles tomorrow versus Arkansas (what do you think of the Hogs now,
	Mimi Griffin???  Arkansas doesn't even have to face IU!)...
                        
Tonight's Matchup:
 
	Midwest Regional, Pontiac Silverdome:
 
	#9 OHIO STATE (27-3) vs. #39 St. John's (22-8)    6:40 pm CST
                        
15.303Awful quiet in here!WMOIS::REEVE_CMon Mar 25 1991 16:011
    
15.304Belated final updateFORTSC::MOKWed Mar 27 1991 17:3933
From: peppler@reepicheep.sws.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball
Subject: FINAL Big Ten UPDATE (3-25-91)  NCAA
Date: 25 Mar 91 14:57:40 GMT

Friday's Miserable Result:
 
Midwest Regional, Pontiac Silverdome:
 
#39 St. John's (23-8) 91, #9 OHIO STATE (27-4) 74:  Ohio State
	certainly picked the worst possible time to lay a big, fat egg.
	But, Easter is coming up, isn't it...  43-24 at halftime!  It was an
	"NCer", to be sure.  The Redmen from the tough, tough Big East
	conference completely dismantled the Big Ten's purported best team
	before a mostly partisan 30,461 Big Ten fans at the Pontiac
	Silverdome, site of Purdue's collosal choke to Kansas State three
	years ago.  As the AP put it, St. John's "beat the top-seeded
	Buckeyes at their own game...They outshot, outran and outrebounded
	Ohio State..."  Mark Baker said, "St. John's kind of catches you
	off-guard.  Everybody said they like to control the tempo, but they
	pushed the ball up."  Looie said, "To play that well and sustain it
	makes me feel very, very good."  Ohio State only got as close as 16
	points in the second half.  When the score read 84-59, I just
	thought to myself, "You've got to be kidding!"  St. John's is good,
	obviously, but Duke sure kicked them yesterday.  Not a good final
	month for the Buckeyes, who truly struggled after the epic second
	OSU-Indiana matchup.  Jim Jackson had 19 points to lead OSU.  The
	seniors Perry Carter and Treg Lee had bad finales, scoring 9 and 6,
	respectively.  The Buckeyes even got outrebounded 29-28, and that
	doesn't happen often.  Robert Werdann had a career-high 21 points
	and Malik Sealy 22 for the Johnies...
 
[....]
15.305Tsk, tsk, tskSHALOT::HUNTSwatch dogs and Diet Coke headsThu Mar 28 1991 15:527
 Minnesota got two years of probation, a ban on football post-season for
 next year, and the loss of a hoops scholarship for next year, too.  The
 wrestling team had some minor penalty placed on it as well.
 
 Lou Holtz and Luther Darville were both implicated in the infractions.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.306Henderson vs. Robinson in HoosierDomeANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoMon Apr 22 1991 17:1324
    Saw the Indiana state high school hoops championship game on ESPN
    this weekend.  It featured star recruits Glenn Robinson (Purdue)
    and Alan Henderson (Indiana).  
    
    Let me just say that the only question remaining about Robinson is
    whether he's ready for the NBA.  This kid is a true widebody.  Very
    explosive.  He reminds me a lot of Alonzo Mourning, but seems to be
    somewhat quicker in the open court.  I have trouble imagining how
    this Webber kid from Michigan cain be any better than Robinson.
    
    Henderson is a painfully thin, but highly skilled.  Dunno if he was
    tired (they play twice on Championship day) but he was slow to get
    upcourt.  Henderons' game suffered mightily from Gary Roosevelt's
    collapsing zone designed to take his game away.  He acted on his
    frustration by canning a trey or two and going 1-on-2 with some
    success.  He's got good hands, a nice shot, cain put theball on the
    floor effectively, and fine timing on his jump.  His major weakness 
    is lack of strength, but he's only 17 somaybe his physique will fill 
    out.  I'd heard that Alan was slated to play forward, but with his 
    current skills he looks more like a center to me.
    
    Glenn, on the other hand, has the muscled body of a 28 year old main.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.307Get ready folks, cause the 'No Widebodies' notes will start soonRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Apr 22 1991 17:478
    Nice setup MrT.  Having said all that you can now, in all good
    conscience of course, point to the fack (tm) that IU was physically
    outmanned each and every time they lose next year.
    
    Poetry!  Sheer, poetry!!  [:^(]
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.308ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoMon Apr 22 1991 18:0924
    As is always the case, both independent analysts and events will
    confirm my statements.  Henderson is skinny.  Real skinny.  Glen
    is a buck stud by anybody's definition.    
    
    These plain facts cain't be wiped away by your foundation-laying 
    obfuscation.  
    
    As for next year's Hoosier talent level, I see this team (guessing,
    cuz I haven't even seen two of their three recruits) as being the
    most talented since the Isiah team of '81.
    
    For the first time in a full decade Bob will have height, strength,
    and depth along the front-line.  It's possible that Calbert Cheany
    will shift at least part-time to his more natural position of off
    guard.  No 6-2 ex-substitute guards in grad school playing forward,
    no centers and/or forwards who went largely unrecruited out of high
    school.  A real honest to god team along the lines of what the other
    big-time programs have.  
    
    True, I was disappointed the second I saw Henderson stand next to the
    scary Robinson, but five guys play on each side and Henderson looks
    like he'll be Indiana's best front-court player in a loooooong time.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.309And you'll still be claiming upset wins, too.SHALOT::HUNTIf Do Then Damned Else DamnedMon Apr 22 1991 18:299
15.310Expectations will be soaring for the Hucksters(tm)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Apr 22 1991 19:1119
    Neither me nor Dean ever declared ourselves the 'poor underdog every
    time (we lace up our sneakers)'.
    
    We *have* correctly pointed out that when we go 29-6 with marginally
    talented players it doesn't mean we cruised 29 times on our talent
    and were upset 6 times.
    
    Enough on this anyways.  What I wanna know is if MorT will belly to the
    bar and admit that IU deserves the favorite role for the National Title
    next year.  (As Dickie Vitale has already indicated.)
    
    I personally feel as though Duke deserves this honor, but that IU
    should be given the #2 spot.  Anything less than a Big 10 Title and
    trip to the Finals should be considered a disapointment.  (If they
    don't play Duke in the Finals, BTW, anything less than a Title should
    be considered a disapointment.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.311I mean, they've got Final Four "experience" and everything...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Apr 22 1991 19:488
    
    Other than the obvious reason of the respective coaching, why shouldn't
    North Carolina with the "marginally talented" (Chris) "Greatest 
    Freshman Class of All Time" (hoops experts) be considered Number Two to
    Duke in the pre-season?
    
    glenn
      
15.312Unbelievable consistent excellence by Dean has side effects...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Apr 22 1991 20:2022
    Ha ha!  Good one glenn.  Imagine trying to accuse the media of *under*
    valuing Carolina's team in a given year!  Haw haw!!!
    
    No, just wearing jerseys that read 'NORTH CAROLINA' instantly means a
    Top 10 preseason ranking, minimum.  Any HS player we're interested in 
    will have his stock immediately raised by the talent scouts.  Anything
    less than a Title or at least a Final 2 appearance is a disapointment. 
    And to suggest anything else labels you a 'whiner'.
    
    Truthfully I'd say next years Carolina bunch has the *potential* to
    compete with the Nerds for the ACC Title, but realistically they're the
    favorites and we'll be battling with the mega-talented Demon Deacons
    for 2nd.  I'd think we have the *potential* to be a Top 10 team; the
    *potential* to do well in the post-season (as we've typically done);
    the *potential* even to reach the Final 4.
    
    Alas though, *potential* is the key, cause we're gonna be very, very
    young, with only 1 senior on the whole squad.  Should be fun watching
    Dean develop 'em though.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.313COMET::JOHNSTONStand Back! I'll handle this!Mon Apr 22 1991 20:249
   Depending on next year's recruiting, I think Indiana could be projected
   a #1 in two to three years.

   I would guess next year they would be projected, on the basis of Bob's
   excellent coaching, to be ranked at 4th or 5th, when in reality, on the
   basis of pure talent, age, and experience, they more fairly would
   expect to be ranked in the 18 to 24 range.

   Mike JN
15.314NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Apr 22 1991 20:2710
    > Ha ha!  Good one glenn.  Imagine trying to accuse the media of *under*
    > valuing Carolina's team in a given year!  Haw haw!!!
    
    Huh?  I was talking about *you*, not the media.  You said Indiana
    should be #2.  Considering their performances this past year, why 
    should Indiana be ranked any higher than North Carolina?
    
    glenn
    
15.315All "supposed to's" are bullVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERLet Sununu hitchhike!Mon Apr 22 1991 20:3415
    >Considering their performances this past year, why 
    >should Indiana be ranked any higher than North Carolina?
    
    Let's see.  They both sort of won their conference title.  They both
    lost to the same team in the NCAA tournement.  They both have recently
    had the best recruiting year in the country, only Bob's is a year
    older.  Besides, Bob has HS Player of the Decade, Damon Bailey and Mr.
    Indiana (or is it Mr. Illinois) Eric Anderson as a senior.  To counter,
    Dean has Lynch and Davis as significant non-great recruiting class
    players.  Oops, Bob snuck in the frosh wide body sky scraping stud,
    Henderson.
    
    Dan
    
    
15.316Bye, bye clangers; hello swishersSHALOT::HUNTIf Do Then Damned Else DamnedMon Apr 22 1991 20:528
 Why of course Carolina will be better ... They just said sayonara to
 three seniors who picked up their masonry degrees by shooting a
 collective 8-for-36 in their choke job to the Jayhawks.
 
 Hey, I'd be looking better, too, if I jettisoned that kind of
 "baggage".
 
 Bob Hunt
15.317From ACCrisp's own mouth last year....DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Mon Apr 22 1991 21:2010
Don't forget...


This is year #2 for the greatest freshman class of all time......

Only 3 more shots at the title.


Metz
15.318I might've called it Dean's best, but never 'Best Ever'.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 00:5112
    Firstly Mr.Metz, *I* never labeled them the greatest freshman class of
    all time.  *Those* unfair expectations were placed by the media.  (BTW,
    they're saying the same thing about the awesome bench coming into
    Michigan this year.  Every year somebody's got 'The Greatest Recruits
    Ever.'  That's what *sells, main!)
    
    Having said that I'll go on and say this crew is 1-for-1 in ACC
    Championships; 1-for-1 in Final 4 appearances; 1-for-1 in *TWENTY-NINE*
    win seasons.  (That's alot, folks.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.319Gotta "snuff" out these Excellent Loss weedsSHALOT::HUNTIf Do Then Damned Else DamnedTue Apr 23 1991 02:029
15.320JUPITR::PARTEECharlie -- Lemieux est le mieuxTue Apr 23 1991 08:4611
>RHETT::KNORR "Carolina Blue"                         12 lines  22-APR-1991 21:51
>         -< I might've called it Dean's best, but never 'Best Ever'. >-
    
    I stay the hell out of this debate (although my expert hoops knowledge
    tells me that Knight is the better coach) because I couldn't care less, 
    but damn, I would have sworn on a witness stand (whether facing a 
    chain-smoking defense attorney or not) that you called it the greatest 
    freshman class ever, ACChris.
    
    Charlie
    
15.321Mourning returns with a vengence HOYAS #1!!!!!!!!CNTROL::CHILDSWhen it matters, Dean never winsTue Apr 23 1991 12:248
 Yeah Dan but Deano already has that widebody stud Eric Montross sitting there
 with a year's experience under his belt. You know the guy Smitty benched 
 cause he was doing too much to control the Kansas game and we couldn't have
 a freshman upstaging the seniors now could we?? hee haw!!!!!!!!!!!

 mike    

15.322RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockTue Apr 23 1991 14:025
    Ah yes, and Chris retreats back to his old arguement - blame the media.
    
    I love it.  The media has caused all of Dean's woes....
    
    JD
15.323Indiana'll be about the 7th best next year...ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 14:3750
>>should Indiana be ranked any higher than North Carolina?
    
>    Let's see.  They both sort of won their conference title.  

Except the Big10 was its weakest ever while the Almost Close was the
nation's best...

>   They both lost to the same team in the NCAA tournement.  

Is there a point here?...

>   They both have recently had the best recruiting year in the country, 

Dan-the-inveterate-fibber just cain't bring himself to tale the whole 
Truth and go on to mention "... but Indiana's was rated 7th best until 
they signed Funderburke, who subsequently left, so what I'm really trying
to say here is that Indiana had the 7th best recruiting year in the country
but I just cain't bring myself to tell the truth in this matter..."

>   Bob has HS Player of the Decade, Damon Bailey and 

So, you're saying that Damon Bailey is the best player to come out of high
school in the past ten years?  I dunno, but if *I* were gonna give out that
honor I'd be looking at David Robinson, Shaquille O'Neal, Shawn Kemp, or
about 125 players before Damon.  What Damon is is the most hyped player of
the decade, benefiting from being white and, most of all, embodying the very
character of the romanticized shooting star in the movie "Hoosiers."

>   Mr. Indiana (or is it Mr. Illinois) Eric Anderson as a senior.  

Mr. Illinois.  He's from Chicago.  It'll be nice to see Eric for the first
time playing power forward instead of weak center, but based on reports his
chronic back problem (he could barely move in the tournament) might see him
undergoing surgery and going red shirt next year.

>   Bob snuck in the frosh wide body sky scraping stud, Henderson.
    
Henderson is anything but that.  He's a_extremely skinny finesse player whose
game reminds me a lotta Ralph Sampson.  And since when is 6-10 "sky scraping?"

Truth is, Bob will for the first time have all the cards up front, with Eric
and Calbert joined by Todd Lindemann (7-1) and Brian Evans (6-7 widebody) in
addition to Pat Graham at small forward (he's really a guard) and the two
stiffs Lawson and Nover for pick-meat.  More important, he'll finally have a
team that cain rebound and, gasp!, block and/or intimidate shots!

No more 3-guard or 4-guard lineups!!

Big10 Tom  
15.324RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockTue Apr 23 1991 14:4510
    To back up MrT - Indiana's recruiting class was ranked high - due to
    Funderburke being a member of it.  W/O him, it dropped.
    
    No way, no way is Damon Bailey the best H.S. player of the decade -
    unless you are talking the 1890's.   That's a NO-BRAINER.  Mr. T starts
    a list of better H.S. players (The Shack comes to mind right away...)
    
    They should have a damn good team over the nexted few years.
    
    JD
15.325Just an observation ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 16:238
    Interesting that JD sees fit to evaluate HS players based on their
    eventual performance when it comes to Indiana, but when critiquing
    Carolina all we hear about are all of Dean's HS All-Americans.
    
    :^(
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.326ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 16:3818
    Where's your beef?  Indiana players traditionally have been lower
    rated outta high school than the Star Heels, and ultimately the
    Star Heels end up glutting the NBA while one or two Hoosiers moon
    about here and there on the end a benches.
    
    No way in HAIL that Damon Bailey is the best H.S. player of the past
    ten years.  He's a nice little guard, not too quick not too strong,
    not the greatest shooter, but a great passer who plays a mistake-free
    floor game.
    
    Input or output, the 'Snuffer ends up the loser on the "G" string.  
    
    As for the comparo between the Hoosiers and the Blews, one need only
    point out that Bob will have Lindemann in the middle cuz the guy he
    wanted will be centermain for the team from Chapel Hell.
    
    Big10 Tom
                                                                      
15.327ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 16:478
    Lost in the shuffle is "coach" Steve Fisher's first monster recruiting
    class, called by Bob Gibbon as even better than last year's harvest
    by North Carolina.  At the haid a this group is Chris Webber, who 
    apparently is a monster widebody.  Then they got this kid from Texas
    who cain sky, David Thompson-style.  They let Voshon Leonard slip away
    to Minnesota, but overall had a killer recruiting class.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.328Fairness in analysis is all I'm looking for.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 17:1016
    My beefs with JD's Thypocritical analysis, not with Bob's failure to 
    develop HS talent into NBA breadwinners.
    
    When evaluating IU HS talent he compares them with what they achieved
    post-HS.  (A correct approach.)
    
    When evaluating Dean Smith and UNC he moans about all our "HS
    All-America's, regardless of how they did post-HS.  (An incorrect
    approach.)
    
    Damon Bailey was a great HS player.  King Rice was a great HS player. 
    Michael Jordan was a great HS player.  Doesn't make them defacto
    collegiate All-Americans though ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.329ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 17:3818
    >Bob's failure to develop HS talent into NBA breadwinners.
    
    Bob has had no such failure.  His failure has been failing to recruit
    future NBA breadwinners.  The good players he's had outta HS (Isiah,
    Wittman, et al) did quite well in the NBA.  He also got several players
    in the NBA who otherwise never woulda been there (Steve Alford for one).
    
    JD's not being hypocritical at all.  He's simply disagreeing with the
    rating given Damon OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL by many.  That's a widespread
    sentiment, especially after Damon got the ball stuffed down his throat
    several times at the McDonald's All Star game.  Damon's a decent recruit,
    one projected after being seen in person as a "future solid player."
    
    This does not put him in the class of Michael or Sam or Shack or Mr.
    Robinson.  And as such the onus cain't be put on to Bob as if he were
    in that same class.
    
    MrT
15.330RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 17:4213
    I agree with JD's judgement of Damon.  Trouble is everytime I try to
    mention the fact that King Rice maybe wasn't the most talented kid in
    the universe I get "But he was a McDonald's All-American - Dean's
    wasting great talent." stuffed down my throat.
    
    The fact is you can't judge players out of HS and, as a result, you
    can't use the argument that "X coach gets HS All-Americans every year
    so X coach outa win more Titles."
    
    Doesn't wash, and Damon is a prime example of why.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.331Bob H, intellectually dishonest, wasn't it?VAXWRK::SCHNEIDERLet Sununu hitchhike!Tue Apr 23 1991 17:4623
    >To back up MrT - Indiana's recruiting class was ranked high - due to
    >Funderburke being a member of it.  W/O him, it dropped.
    
    I'm sure you'd all line up on Dean's side, say, if he ran Montross off
    his team, then prevented him from attending the college of his choice. 
    Sure you would.
    
    But in this twisted sports commentary we participate in, where
    poor-mouthing your favorite team stands alone in the pantheon of
    achievements, the Funderburke fiasco has actually turned into a feather
    in Bob's cap.  By the way, the Best in the Country recruiting class for
    IU in '89 did count Fenderburke, but didn't count Cheaney.  Seems to me
    that he more than makes up the difference.  He'll probably be
    pre-season All America, despite the fact that MrT whines that this
    prototype college quick forward belongs at the off guard!  Maybe in the
    NBA, but at very few college programs, but than that's just part of the
    coin of the soft soap peddling, isn't it?
    
    >No way, no way is Damon Bailey the best H.S. player of the decade -
    
    He won the award.  The others didn't.
    
    Dan
15.332DECWET::METZGERThere's a jar with your name on it.Tue Apr 23 1991 17:4914
Chris,

I don't have the time to go back through all the old sports notes so I'll leave
it at this. If you didn't call Dean's freshman class the greatest of all time
you certainly expressed great joy in the news medias assesment of it as such.

In fact I bet you used the quote from the papers several times in describing 
this class. I even made it a point last year to ask you if after 4 years this
class failed to win the big enchilada if you would consider Dean an 
underachiever ? 


Metz
15.333Webber = power forwards stud. Needs disciplineVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERLet Sununu hitchhike!Tue Apr 23 1991 17:5216
    >At the haid a this group is Chris Webber, who 
    >apparently is a monster widebody.
    
    I saw him play some in one of those All Star games ESPN telecasts.  It
    was tough to make any judgements because it was very play ground.  Most
    times, the big guys would haul down a rebound and then set off down
    court with it and pull up for a 20 foot J, Webber doing this frequently. 
    All you could really see was the athleticism, and it was there in
    abundance.
    
    Travis Best looked very good to me running the offense (when the
    centers and forwards let him).  I think Tech will appreciate him
    relative to Anderson as he seems to understand there's four teammates
    on the floor with him.
    
    Dan
15.334ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 17:5415
    >didn't count Cheaney.
    
    Yes it did.  Cheaney was accounted for in the rating of that 
    particular recruiting class.
    
    As for Funderburke, he was thrown off his HS team for behavioral
    problems, and offered himself to Bob (Bob didn't go to him) saying
    that what he needed was discipline.  Most everybody (including 
    Lawrence's HS coach, MrT, and Doug Ross) predicted he'd be off the 
    Indiana team within a season and they were right.  That's not "a 
    feather in Bob's cap," it's only a simple, plain fact that you couldn't
    bring yourself to recognize in your statement what you already knew.
    
    Big10 Tom
    
15.335I was hoping for a few years of IU probation!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 18:029
    > offered himself to Bob (Bob didn't go to him) saying that what he
    > needed was discipline.
    
    An interesting analysis, especially considering the hot water IU nearly
    found themselves in regarding charges of Bob's assistant coaches
    illegally tampering with Funderburke.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.336At least cancels out the poor mouthing over FunderburkeVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERLet Sununu hitchhike!Tue Apr 23 1991 18:2811
    >Yes it did.  Cheaney was accounted for in the rating of that 
    >particular recruiting class.
    
    He wasn't in that the strength of that recruiting class was the 4 or 5
    top 50 high schoolers.  Cheaney was not among them.  He was a sleeper, a
    plum.
    
    Bob's failure with Funderburke notwithstanding, Cheaney more than makes
    up for it.
    
    Dan
15.337wrong... and wrongANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 18:5511
    Again, you're wrong on both points.  Cheaney was ranked in the top
    50 - all of them were except for the stiff redhaid Lawson.  From
    memory, Cheaney was somewhere down in the high 30s or low 40s.
    
    And it's doubtful, on a team forced to play 3- or even 4-guard
    lineups that Cheaney's scoring (he's still learning how to play the
    boards and inside D) "more than makes up for" a star stud middlemain
    who cain block shots, monster the boards, and score at will from the
    inside.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.338ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 18:5918
    >interesting analysis, especially considering the hot water IU
    >nearly found themselves in regarding charges of Bob's assistant
    >coaches illegally tampering with Funderburke.
    
    Ahhh, classic Indiana recruting scandal: A competitor school 
    levels the charge that the recruit HAD A_ILLEGAL PHONE CALL PLACED
    to him to verify whether he still intended to sign the following
    week.
    
    That's why it was a class act for Bob to force ThunderBurpe to 
    make good on his minimum academic committment to the school and
    finish his freshmain credits: A troubled kid who himself admitted
    to having everything handed him cuz a his hoops prowess needs to 
    learn that the game is a two-way street.  One cain only sigh in
    resignation that it'll be a competitor school that reaps the benefit
    from this fine lesson.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.339Bob loosens the reigns, perhaps to stay competitive?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 19:0416
    > Ahhh, classic Indiana recruting scandal: A competitor school
    > levels the charge ...
    
    Apparently IU's not the only school to get turned in by a competitor. 
    Iowa turned in Big10 bro Illinois, which then landed into the
    equivalent of the NCAA's Big House.  Haw!
    
    Bottom line #1:	Just cause somebody turned you in doesn't mean
    			you're innocent.
    
    Bottom line #2:	Indiana wanted Thunderburke *badly* cause he was
    			a big time player.  (Top 5 in USA, as his early
    			season play at IU attested to.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.340ClarificationRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockTue Apr 23 1991 19:4814
    Chris,
    
    YOu totally misinterpreted me.  Dan made some ermark about Damon Bailey
    being the H.S. Player of the Decade.  I simply said there is no way in
    hell that Bailey was the player of the decade.  However, just like the
    Star Heels, Bailey is a H.S. All-American.  Just like them.   I don't
    make any differences.   Dean happens to have 12 of em all the time. 
    And does virtually nothing with them.
    
    As for the recruiting class, I read that Bob's class was devalued after
    initial reports.  Nothing more than that.  It still was a darn good one
    - but inferior to last year's haul by the Tarhells.
    
    JD
15.341I'm asking the obvious, I realize ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Apr 23 1991 19:528
    > Dean happens to have 12 of em all the time.  And does virtually
    > nothing with them.
    
    Is it safe to assume, JD, that "virtually nothing" is your definition
    of failing to win a Title?  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.342ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoTue Apr 23 1991 19:559
    >Indiana wanted Thunderburke *badly* cuz he was a top 5 player...
    
    He was the top player, period, in the ratings I saw.  And, sure,
    the Hoosiers wanted him badly.  But, ThunderBurpe approached the
    Hoosiers.  We never go after a superstar stud big guy, cuz we know
    that they'll never come to a place where the work ethic is high
    and the pay is low ($0.00 per hr.).
    
    MrT
15.343STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishTue Apr 23 1991 20:0015
    
    Just adding facts, go about your regular business....
    
    Ranking of IU's freshman class:
    
    1. Funderburke
    2. P. Graham
    3. G. Graham
    4. C Cheaney
    5. C. Reynolds
    6. C. Lawson
    
    The first 5 were top 50 selections....
    
    Source: Street + Smiths
15.344RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JONew Squids on the BlockTue Apr 23 1991 20:0112
    Chris,
    
    Yep, failing to win a titile, despite yearly overwhelming talent.
    
    Also, Dean and Bob have great framework right now to build a
    champeenship team.  I'd expect to see a champeenship banner hanging
    from the rafters of one of em by the end of 94.  How's that.
    
    And Dan, if Montross was kicked off of UNC's incoming class, then they
    wouldn't have had the 'greatest recruiting class' ever.  how's that.
    
    JD
15.345EARRTH::BROOKSI'm having an old friend for dinner...Tue Apr 23 1991 21:1717
    
re .342
    
>    We never go after a superstar stud big guy, cuz we know
>    that they'll never come to a place where the work ethic is high
>    and the pay is low ($0.00 per hr.).
   
    Yeah, like Moruning, Ferry, Ewing, Worthy, Lattner, Daugherty, and
    about ten dozen other big men ?
    
    Fack is T, is that Knight is inflexible and incapable of recruiting big
    men if they threw themselves at his feet.
    
    You're sounding more like Chris everyday. Stop making excuses and tell
    Da Troof !                                                     
    
    The Doc
15.346ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoWed Apr 24 1991 14:0654
    >You're sounding more Chris everyday...
    
    Ouch!  Main, that really hurt, Doc.  You reely go straight for 
    the 'nads.  Ok ok, I was jest baiting him a beat, but, remembering
    that Bob - wisely or otherwise - restricts his recruiting more or
    less to the core midwest region, from memory here are a couple a
    big men Bob didn't git and why:
    
    - Deon Thomas, demanded big cash, turned away by Bob, paid $80,000
      plus perks by "coach" Lou Hitsome.
    
    - Sean Kemp, told Bob that he needed "many tens of thousands" and
      was turned away only to fall into the clutches of the infamous
      scumbag (and latter-day ESPN victim-hero) Eddie Sutton. 
                 
    The stories go on.  I've long felt that Bob needs to go national as
    his competition did a long time ago.  But he's a traditionalist, and
    has a team dominated not only by kids from the neighborhood but indeed
    by Hoosier homies.  Cain't git away with that anymore, not when the
    big-time recruiters ('Snuffy, Heathcoate, Fisher, Pitino, and many
    others) recruit on your home turf.  This is especially true with the
    quality big men, who of course are as rare as hen's teef'.
    
    >quit making excuses...
    
    Again must I point out to you that in Bob's case no excuses are
    necessary, not even on "G"-string issues?  You persist in confusing
    input issues with output issues.  Sure Bob's a lousy recruiter, in
    part cuz he consciously limits himself.  But when you're on top on
    the output side nothing need be explained when you've won nearly half
    your conference Titles (we have real Titles out here, btw) and have
    been inducted into the Pantheon for winning you-know-what 3 times.
    
    re: Cap
    
    Thank you thank you, but it's a given that factual reality won't make
    a dent in our egomaniacal friend's armor-plated tongue.  Funny, but
    it's hard to imagine either Graham bro being that highly rated.  I
    like them both (especially Gregg), but both have limitations.  Pat's
    got a SEVERE case of WMD, but is gutsy and now that he's found his
    shot again will really help.  Gregg has never been a good J-shooter,
    a real failing for a_off guard.  He has all the physical talents, 
    though, he's very explosive off the floor.  I saw him put down a
    slam in the faces of Minnesota's two big guys and they looked 
    helpless in 1-on-2.
    
    Calbert needs to continue improving his floor game.  His defense and
    rebounding cain be awful at times, but Bob's unrelenting instruction
    has gotten him nearly consistent... so long as things are going ok
    with the whole team.  He cain disappear on the defensive end when
    things've gone awry for the squad, leaving only out-of-position Eric
    to lead.
    
    Big10 Tom 
15.347New LogoANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoWed May 01 1991 16:018
    The Big10 unveiled its new logo yesterday.  Purty slick, it's a
    block lettered BIG TEN... with the number "11" delineated in the
    background bracketing the "E."  
    
    It was designed by a grad student in fine arts and the University
    a Northern Illinois, a MidContinent Conference.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.348Ah, the advantages of not locking yourself in with numbers...RHETT::KNORRACC: Conference of the 90'sWed May 01 1991 16:149
    Granted I don't have my PhD in mafematics, but could someone please
    explain to me (either verbally or via some presumably complex equation)
    the significance of the "TEN" in "BIG TEN", given that there's eleven
    (11) teams in the conference.
    
    Thankee.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.349MCIS1::DHAMELI need some sensible shortsWed May 01 1991 16:198
    
    The Big 11 has a 10 in it for the same reasons the Lakers play nowhere
    a lake, and the Utah team plays in the jazz capitol of the world.
    
    Dickstah
    
    P.S.  The Red Sox don't wear red socks either, just red stirrups.
    
15.350virtually 10HBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughWed May 01 1991 16:239
>    Big10 Tom

Shouldn't that be BIG TEN Tom?

It's interesting the it's blue and white, the Penn State colors. And my
first impression was to warn Northwestern to watch out. Maybe the big
plan is to edge them out and go back to a real 10 team conference.

TTom
15.351All hail Penn State!NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed May 01 1991 16:2712
        
> It's interesting the it's blue and white, the Penn State colors. And my
> first impression was to warn Northwestern to watch out. Maybe the big
> plan is to edge them out and go back to a real 10 team conference.
    
    I really see no good reason to continue this myth that Northwestern
    is actually a part of the Big Ten.  At this point, I think they 
    probably qualify under MrT's criteria as one of them moochy-mooch 
    welfare-state schools...
    
    glenn
    
15.352There really *is* an answer!RHETT::KNORRACC: Conference of the 90'sWed May 01 1991 16:556
    Yea, that's the ticket, TTom.  There's only enough physical space for
    TEN teams, but thanks to good ole virtual memory a very large number of
    teams could be added without changing the conference name!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.353Northwestern suporterNEMAIL::LEARYMWed May 01 1991 17:5313
    Don't think that Northwestern would be a-bounced from the Big Ten.
    It is a vital asset to the Big Ten academically. I think it is head and
    shoulders above the rest of the Big Ten academically (with the
    exception of Michigan overall  and Purdue in some specialized areas).
    
    Just a couple of observations. I'm not overly familiar with the Big
    ten, only having been geographically close to some of the schools (ND)
    and knowing a bunch of people who went to some of the state schools
    out there.  Perhaps someone a little closer to the conf (MrT ?) could
    expand.
    
    MikeL
    
15.354LUNER::BROOKSI saw Marvin Gaye yesterday ...Wed May 01 1991 18:152
    T isn't that close to the Big 10 - he just stays within rollerblade
    striking distance, if you know what I mean ....
15.355ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoWed May 01 1991 19:3223
    >I think it is head and shoulders above the rest of Big Ten
    >academically
    
    Here we go again.  Harking back to Dan's caste bilge... "a place
    to meet future business associates" ... "find a wife" ... and so
    forth.  
    
    Fact is, small private colleges, with major exceptions such as 
    MIT, Caltech, Carnegie-Mellon, pedal exclusivity more than academic
    excellence, with people slavering over as gene-pool schools.  The
    University of Minnesota alone could swallow all of NU into its 
    School of Engineering.
    
    Northwestern and other schools like it serve primarily as a place
    for rich kids to go and get their MBAs and law degrees.  Who needs
    'em?  Wisconsin, for instance, is a much heavier academic environment
    overall.  
    
    If NU left the Big10 they wouldn't be missed, especially entering an
    era where science and engineering have taken a position of predominant
    importance.
    
    Big10 Tom 
15.356BUDDUA::WASKOMWed May 01 1991 20:1429
    Northwestern has one of the top 10 rated business schools in the
    country, outstanding legal and medical schools, and a very well
    regarded school of engineering.  I believe that their journalism
    program is one of the top 10 in the country, along with an outstanding
    drama department and strong liberal arts programs.  They do not have an
    agriculture program, nor a home economics program - both of which were
    listed at Purdue as required departments for a land grant university
    when I was attending there.  I don't remember there being a major
    available in Phys Ed, either.  (I grew up within 10 miles of Northwestern, 
    did some high school programs there, and have investigated it as a 
    potential school for my son.)
    
    I don't believe that you will see Northwestern leave the Big Ten, in
    spite of their perenniel underdog status in the major team sports.  To
    the best of my knowledge, which includes personal friendship with
    alumni recruiters/interviewers for the university, they do "needs
    blind" admission, and have very few students who are unable to attend
    for financial reasons -- ie, they have a great financial aid endowment
    available to put together packages for their students.  They emphasize
    academic performance and leadership potential as their criteria for
    admittance - in that order.  Academics come first there, and it's an
    example that I wish more schools would follow.
    
    The Big Ten is about more than sports, although that's all that we ever
    hear about in the press.  Northwestern more than carries its weight in
    the academic, research, and administrative areas that constitute the
    other venues of conference interest.
    
    A&W
15.357ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoThu May 02 1991 02:1126
    Be that as it may, the statement was thatNU is head and shoulders
    ave the rest of the Bigbovg10 academically, which is a_ignorant 
    statement.  In a recent magazine ranking (and granted they're 
    flawed) the other 9 Big10 schools were plastered all over the top
    listings in various areas - some more so than NU.  
    
    It's an old saw that private schools are automatically better, a
    natural reaction to the attractiveness of the exclusivity involved.
    As r "needs blind" admission, wanna bet whetNU's demographics
    blow out those of the 9 state schools?  
    
    Fact is that top state schools compare faorably.  The Big10 happens
    to have a fairlheavy lineup of fine state schools.  Buoth there are
    many others (Berkeley, Penn State,arolina, UCLA, Washington, etc.)
    
    It's simple east coast provincialism that brings out this crap that
    thtoprivate schools blow out the top state schools. Out there,
    maybe, but not west of tppalachians. 
    I'm not putting down NU.  I'm just pointing out some convenient 
    myths and the reasons for them.   Private schools are a collection
    of core departments devoid of the ancillary departments/schools
    that stateuniversities are chartered to run.  If one's talking
    academic excellence, the core dept./schools of the two groups is
    the only fair comparison.
    
    MrT
15.358lacking somethingHBAHBA::HAASBig Smile at the DrivethroughThu May 02 1991 11:0911
Academic ratings notwithstanding, I see no reason why Northwestern can't
be competitive in major athletics.

Duke does it. Stanford does it. Hell, Rice looked good lasted year in
football.

Maybe it's part of the "Northwestern Is Better" mystique to have lousy
basketball and football teams. To that extent, Northwestern lowers the
prestige of the BIG T1E1N.

TTom
15.3597221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu May 02 1991 11:5419
    The anti-public college and university chauvinism is killing the
    University of Massachusetts and the state college system around here. 
    The attitude is and always has been "why have a public college and
    university system when we have the greatest private colleges and
    universities in the world?"  Making matters even worse is that
    virtually no one in state government is a product of our state schools. 
    The ones who aren't part of the Boston College old-boy network (or even
    better, Triple Eagles, those who went to Boston College High School,
    then Boston College then Boston College Law School) are from the
    Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.  We also have John Silber,
    President of Boston University, lobbying to keep certain programs out
    of the state system because they'll compete with his programs at BU.
    
    Of course, this state is such a f**ked up mess right now that maybe it
    needs its graduates of state colleges and universities to straighten it
    out.
    
    John
        
15.360Buy them out, whatever; the games just aren't funny anymore...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu May 02 1991 12:2116
    
    Northwestern's academic quality had absolutely nothing to do with my
    statements.  They simply come nowhere near a minimal standard of
    competition on the gridiron or on the hardcourt, and as was 
    suggested, I think they almost enjoy that fact.  If they want to 
    remain in the alliance in areas where they're competitive, both 
    academically and athletically, I would have no problem with that.  
    But at their near 1-AA status in both these major revenue sports, 
    their participation is a joke.  I don't expect that fact to be 
    recognized by the sports media if this subject ever seriously comes 
    up within the Big Ten, though.  Rather, I'm sure we'll be hearing 
    the usual money-first, greed-in-sports angle even when it doesn't 
    apply here.  
    
    glenn
    
15.361ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoThu May 02 1991 12:4114
    It's much easier for a private school to suceed at hoops than
    football cuz a the size of grid squads.  Apart from SoCal and
    Notre Dame, I'd guess Stanford does about the best, and they're 
    seldom at the upper echelon of the Pac10 (do they *really* only 
    care about the Cal game?).  I'm not sure whether Pitt is public
    or private.
    
    A real disappointment has been Foster's effort with the Mildcats.
    He seemed to have them positioned to break through, then, year
    before last, everybody transferred out for some unknown reason.
    
    Big10 Tom
    
    
15.362SACT41::ROSSI got me some Pumps!Thu May 02 1991 13:075
It's too bad the Big 10 couldn't buy out Northwestern to get them to leave
the Big 10.   A swap out with Penn State would have made the most sense...
Continue to give NW a cut of the revenues, but let them seek a more
competitive league.   

15.363The REAL school in Pittsburgh is Carnegie-MellonSHALOT::MEDVIDcould not hear or see for jealousyThu May 02 1991 14:325
    Pitt is a public school.  Relatively cheap tuition for in-staters.  
    
    Isn't Clemson a private school?  If so, there's one for your list, T.
    
    	--dan'l
15.364ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoThu May 02 1991 14:553
    Yeah, Dan'l, but Clemson's special: They cheat like crazy.
    
    MrT
15.365CAM::WAYThat mean mannish boy....Thu May 02 1991 14:592
I can't for the life of me figure out why, but for some reason
Carnegie-Mellon University always makes me think of Busty Heart.....
15.366Still got that chip on your shoulder, MrT?VAXWRK::SCHNEIDERSununu escaped from Animal FarmThu May 02 1991 15:0020
    >Here we go again.  Harking back to Dan's caste bilge...
    
    There was no "caste bilge" in any of my notes.  And, as a matter of
    fact, when MrT made an issue implying racial inequity at the superior
    private schools relative to the state school that he was promoting, I
    went and looked it up.  In fact, he was dead wrong.
    
    People have to determine this issue for themselves.  If you're
    interested talk to educational counselors, go to the library or
    bookstore and find books which discuss programs offered at each, talk
    to heads of businesses and find out where they get the best people
    from.  Try to determine which schools accept the brightest students,
    which have the lowest student-teacher ratios.
    
    After examining all these factors, and certainly more, the answers
    become very clear.  Nothing to do with race, nothing to do with caste,
    nothing to do with gene-pool.  Everything to do with quality of
    education, quality of student and the future.
    
    Dan
15.367ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoThu May 02 1991 15:1212
    >I went and looked it up.  In fact, he was dead wrong.
    
    Total bull.  Another Dan-fib.  You never submitted any sources
    on that one.  Fact is, beyond the programs to bring in the tokens,
    private schools are populated by whiter richers students.  Suggestion
    otherwise is total unmitigated bullshit.  Of course, in the technical
    schools (like Stanford) most of the grad students seem to be oriental,
    but the same holds in the public grad schools.  :^)
    
    And no, no chip on my shoulder, just clearing up the ridiculous
    statement about NU being "head and shoulders" above the rest of
    the conference.
15.368*Gigantic* chip on MrT's shoulderVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERSununu escaped from Animal FarmThu May 02 1991 15:1915
    >Total bull.  Another Dan-fib.  You never submitted any sources
    >on that one.  Fact is, beyond the programs to bring in the tokens,
    >private schools are populated by whiter richers students.
    
    It's so nice to see you make something like this up.
    
    THere are no disclaimers about these alleged "token programs", but I
    invite anyone who is interested in the issue to troop on down to a book
    store, and just browse through college and/or grad school catalogs. 
    They break down minority students for you there, and you'll see the
    truth for yourself.
    
    It certainly wasn't in 15.367.
    
    Dan
15.369'All Men Are Created Equal' not a motto the Ivies live by...RHETT::KNORRACC: Conference of the 90'sThu May 02 1991 15:3610
    The 'gene pool' argument has some merit, when you consider that alums
    of the big-money private schools (and big-time donors, no doubt) are
    virtually guaranteed assurance their son/daughter will be granted
    admission, regardless of qualification.  
    
    The slot this person takes will no doubt take away a position of a more
    qualified applicant.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.370CAM::WAYThat mean mannish boy....Thu May 02 1991 15:406
Dan and MrT:

		The Ali-Norton of SPORTS


8^)
15.371ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoThu May 02 1991 15:4415
    >After examining all these factors, and certainly more, the answers
    >become very clear.
    
    Only if you compare the top private schools to all state schools.
    If you compared top vs. top, the answer, of course, wouldn't be so
    clear at all.  And if you compared all vs. all, the private schools
    would lose out very badly, for the majority of pud schools in this
    country are private schools, the ones you never hear about, from 
    Air or anybody else.  This comparison would be even starker if one
    looked at out-of-state applicant criteria.  Ftm, if you look at 
    out-of-state tuitions of the better state schools they look a helluva
    lot like the better private schools.
    
    MrT
    
15.372ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMandingoThu May 02 1991 15:4613
    >Dan and MrT:
    >
    >		The Ali-Norton of SPORTS
    
    Good one, Frankie.  Air of course would play the role of Ken Norton,
    the main who abstained from sex months prior to a fight to get psyched
    up, the main who put form over function... the main who led with his 
    chin.
    
    This is why I use the p_name Mandingo.  To honor Air, for Ken played
    the rebellious slave in that fine but forgotten work a art.
    
    MrT 
15.373VAXWRK::SCHNEIDERSununu escaped from Animal FarmThu May 02 1991 15:5119
    >The 'gene pool' argument has some merit, when you consider that alums
    >of the big-money private schools (and big-time donors, no doubt) are
    >virtually guaranteed assurance their son/daughter will be granted
    >admission, regardless of qualification.  
    
    When you consider that the same is true of virtually any school, the
    'gene pool' argument has no merit.
    
    BTW, the Kellogg School, Northwestern's b-school, is again the top
    rated business school in the country from Business Week's annual
    survey.  Other reports have it very high as well (some first), and it
    easily outdistances the rest of the Big 10, though Michigan puts in a
    strong showing, and Indiana gets a mention here or there.
    
    There is no need to support the argument that Northwestern doesn't
    compete athletically with the rest of the conference, and this does
    support the non-T arguments about its academics.
    
    Dan
15.374These people go on to lead companies, people.RHETT::KNORRACC: Conference of the 90'sThu May 02 1991 16:0118
    > When you consider that the same is true of virtually any school,
    > the 'gene pool' argument has no merit.
    
    If you're right (and you very well may be) I'd agree with you, *for the
    purposes of this discussion*.  (i.e. private vs. public schools)
    
    In the larger sense I find the concept of Muffy and Biff getting into
    'Name your Big Time School' cause of mommy and daddy's bucks a
    sickening thing indeed.
    
    What makes it worse at a private school is that *usually* it's harder
    to get admitted to these schools but, once you're in, a very high
    number graduate.  Other schools (Georgia Tech is one) will admit alot
    of people, but actually getting your degree ('specially engineering) is
    *extremely* difficult.  (Usually takes 5 years @ Tech.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.3757221::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu May 02 1991 16:125
    Most schools have engineering programs that last 5 years.
    
    Clemson is a state school.
    
    John
15.376SACT41::ROSSI got me some Pumps!Thu May 02 1991 16:144
>Dan and MrT:
>		The Ali-Norton of SPORTS

That would be Ali McGraw and Ed Norton, right?
15.377MrT can't seem to handle the truthVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERSununu escaped from Animal FarmThu May 02 1991 17:227
    >If you compared top vs. top, the answer, of course, wouldn't be so
    >clear at all.
    
    I was speaking of comparing the top to the top.  The answers from the
    assembled data are very clear.
    
    Dan
15.378ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYThu May 02 1991 18:507
    That's not so at all, Ken.  Half the names on the various lists 
    are state universities.  Also, analyses of entrants into the 
    prestige grad programs show that grads of the better state 
    schools fare very well.  So much for your theory that the elites
    predominately come from private ones.  
    
    MrT
15.379ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri May 31 1991 15:049
    The Minnesota Golden Gophers' recruiting class ended up ranked
    9th in the nation thanx to the recruitment a 6-6 Voshon Lenard
    outta De-troit.  Michigan's class is ranked No. 1 in the nation.
    Indiana may be shopping for another big main now that the under-
    talented redhaid Crhis Lawson has gone to Vandy.  One wonders 
    where Purdue's class is ranked having recruited Glen Robinson,
    who may turn out to be the best player of the whole group.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.380ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYAyrton Senna, show us I dare yaMon Jul 08 1991 15:3814
    Gophers' class was ranked 19th by Future Stars, a scouting service
    out of Iowa.  Small forward Voshon Leonard was top10, Minnesota
    also got a big guard and long range shooter outta Martinsville
    Indiana (forget his name).  Bob rues not having gone after him, but 
    there is no room for another guard on his squad.  The Golden Goofs
    tapped another top20 type in Jayson Walton, a jumping jack outta
    Dallas.
    
    Nuclear widebody stud and Purdue recruit Glenn Robinson failed to
    score well enough on his SATs to play this year, he'll go Prop 48
    or whatever it is now.  To a_Indiana fan this ain't necessarily the
    most heartbreaking news...
    
    Big   Big10 Tom
15.381ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Jul 22 1991 15:437
    This note is just to extend, from the Big10 corner, our heartfelt
    thanks to those ACC men who participated in the recent co-op 
    victory in the Snuffy Smif' debate.
    
    Kudos, gents!
    
    Big10 Tom
15.382So much for Bob's alleged talent woes ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 16 1991 14:195
    "It would be great to coach like Bob Knight at Indiana and play nothing
     but man-to-man - as long as you can be as sure as he is that you'll
     have the athletes to do it year in and year out."
    
    - Pat Kennedy, hoops coach of the ACC's Florida State Seminoles 
15.383CAM::WAYParty on, GarthWed Oct 16 1991 14:2310
>
>    "It would be great to coach like Bob Knight at Indiana and play nothing
>     but man-to-man - as long as you can be as sure as he is that you'll
>     have the athletes to do it year in and year out."
>    
>    - Pat Kennedy, hoops coach of the ACC's Florida State Seminoles 


Sounds like another ACC Coach working up to have a reason for a_excellent
loss......
15.384locked upHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelWed Oct 16 1991 14:2611
Hold on there, Saw.

There is one team in the ACC that reveres and practices the art of the
excellent loss and that team is the No Carolina Tar Heels. It has taken
that program 30+ years to perfect it and they are not about to let anyone
else get in on that plan without a fight.

Up with excellent losses! Down with Champeenship type end of season
peaks! Go Slasher!

TTom
15.385Man-to-man needs lung capacity and focusSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Wed Oct 16 1991 14:3313
 It doesn't take an abundance of God-given basketball *talent* to play
 man-to-man defense.
 
 On the contrary, man-to-man is a very simple defense to play on the
 chalkboard.    What it takes on the court are extremely well-conditioned
 and well-coached players.   Knight's players have *rarely* ever lacked
 those characteristics.
 
 Conditioning and discipline are separate from talent.   Always have been. 
 Mark Aguirre at DePaul was a prime example of this simple but elegant
 truth.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.386All the guts in the world won't make up for slow feetRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 16 1991 14:4121
    > It doesn't take an abundance of God-given basketball *talent* to play 
    > man-to-man defense.
    
    Apparently you're in direct disagreement with Pat Kennedy (a pretty
    fair coach BTW) but heck, ya know more than a HoFer so why should we be
    surprised?
    
    I realize this probably belongs in the ACC note, but what they hey.
    Here's FSU's record against ACC schools:
    
    			W	L
    		       ---     ---
    Wake Forest		1	1
    Georgia Tech       15	9
    Maryland		0	0
    Virginia		0	0
    Duke		0	1
    NC State		2	3
    Clemson		5	6
    North Carolina	1      11
    
15.387Dan Dakich meet Michael JordanSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Wed Oct 16 1991 14:5721
15.388peaking gutsHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelWed Oct 16 1991 15:116
>           -< All the guts in the world won't make up for slow feet >-

And all the regular season victories won't make up for no guts in the
champheenship.

TTom
15.389AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopWed Oct 16 1991 15:145
15.390Can't believe you buy MrT's no-talent line... Unreal.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 16 1991 15:1811
    Making a distinction between "talent" and "athletes" has gotta be the
    grossest example of splitting hairs I've ever heard.  THEY'RE ONE
    AND THE SAME THING.
    
    I'll grant you that some athletes don't play man 'D' very well because
    they lack stamina and work ethic, but the fact remains that you CANNOT
    play man-to-man defense unless you possess the necessary foot speed and
    quickness.  It's a prerequisite for the job, plain and simple.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.391CAM::WAYParty on, GarthWed Oct 16 1991 15:2820
>
>    Making a distinction between "talent" and "athletes" has gotta be the
>    grossest example of splitting hairs I've ever heard.  THEY'RE ONE
>    AND THE SAME THING.


NOT!


I'll give you two examples:  Athlete A posesses skill and can do magic
with a round ball.  Athlete B has a modicum of skill, one giant heart full
of enthusiasm and willingness to work, and works his tailbone off.

Both may excel, but one does so on grit and determination, and the other
on the whim of his brain....

Not the same thing at all....

'Saw

15.392RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Sons of Katie ElderWed Oct 16 1991 15:3526
    Chris -
    
    You are WAY wrong on thinking 'talent' and 'athlete' are the same
    thing.
    
    Talent can only take you so far.  Granted in *some* cases, talent can
    take one to the pinnacle.  However, not all athletes are talented.  
    That's why some folks have to work and work and work to get anywhere on
    the athletic field (field used generically.....)
    
    You can make up for foot speed in many ways - cheating, anticipating.
    Dan Dakich (SP?) didn't have great foot speed, now did he, but he sure
    as heck shackled one Mr. Air Snub the Prez Jordan, now didn't he.
    
    Also, the quote that you are getting 'woodied' about - you could change
    "Bob Knight" and put in most coaches from big, successful hoops
    programs.   They do get athletes every year.  Some get more talented
    athletes than others (which is why you see recruiting classes rated).
    
    If talent and athlete were the same, then everyone would be even, no?
    
    I'll tell ya one thing, in my personal experience, there was a ton of
    difference between walk-on athletes and talented scholarship
    athletes...
    
    JD 
15.393Today's lunch special ... Good Ol' Fashioned Fried SoupSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Wed Oct 16 1991 15:5616
 Had enough yet, Soup ???
 
 My high school baseball coach had a sign in the locker room that read ...
 
 	"Talent Without Hustle Is Nothing,
 	 Hustle Without Talent Is Something,
 	 Hustle With Talent Is Everything."
 
 For the record, Pat Kennedy is right.  Indiana teams are never as bereft
 of raw talent as our beloved MrT would like to have us believe.   But
 there is also little doubt that each of Knight's *THREE* titlists were
 most definitely *not* the most talented teams in the country that year.  
 
 Their hustle and discipline carried them over the top.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.394Ketch successfully dodges issues, then makes my point!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 16 1991 16:3019
    > For the record, Pat Kennedy is right.  Indiana teams are never as bereft
    > of raw talent as our beloved MrT would like to have us believe.   
    
    Thank you, oh thank you (!!!) for making my point for me.  This fact,
    so beautifully stated by you, was my singular motivation for posting
    the quote in the first place.  Please feel free to return to your
    talent vs. athlete rathole though.
    
    > But there is also little doubt that each of Knight's *THREE* titlists 
    > were most definitely *not* the most talented teams in the country that 
    > year.  
    
    Come back?  Bob's '76 undefeated team is generally regarded as the best 
    collegiate basketball team of All-Time.  His '81 team was loaded to the 
    gills in talent as well, as even MorT admits.  Only his '87 team can 
    honestly be considered overachievers.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.395STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishWed Oct 16 1991 16:5527
    
    ACChris has given us the essence of Dean Smith the man and the
    choker in his attempt to put NC in a positive light.
    
    >I realize this probably belongs in the ACC note, but what they hey.
    >Here's FSU's record against ACC schools:
    
    >			W	L
    		       ---     ---
    >Wake Forest	1	1
    >Georgia Tech       15	9
    >Maryland		0	0
    >Virginia		0	0
    >Duke		0	1
    >NC State		2	3
    >Clemson		5	6
    >North Carolina	1      11
    
    An analysis of the 1-11 record shows the following.  NC beat Fla. St. 
    11 times during the regular season and lost to them only once...
    
    But it was during the Final Four and Carolina was heavily favored to
    win....(1972)
    
    At least Dean is consistent....
    
    Cap
15.396CAM::WAYParty on, GarthWed Oct 16 1991 16:599
As usual, Cap has shed light into the darkened corners of the 
UNC Propaganda room.

Just like Jimmy "I have sinned (sob sob) against God" Swaggart getting 
arrested again, so too has Dean been effectively shown to be the choker
that he is.....


'Saw
15.397STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishWed Oct 16 1991 17:0013
    IU in 76 was the best 'TEAM' in the country but an arguement could be
    made that they were not the most talented individually.
    
    UCLA with Kermit washington, Marques Johnson, Andre McCarter, David
    Greenwood and Ray Townsend were very talented individually(but they
    were coached by Gene Bartow not Wooden).  Both Rutgers and Michigan 
    were very talented as well.
    
    Almost every expert does agree though that this team was the result of
    one of the best coaching jobs in the history of the NCAA's, as it
    resulted in perfection....
    
    Cap
15.398Fly on your own from now onSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Wed Oct 16 1991 17:0433
15.399RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Sons of Katie ElderWed Oct 16 1991 17:1218
    Hey, everyone *knows* IU hgets hoop talent.  No doubt about it.  Cept
    it aint in the Tarhells(tm) class.  Wanna take a gander at those 1981
    starting lineups again....
    
    Knight's first team was indeed a very good hoop team.  No doubt about
    it.  Also a perfect team.  
    
    But the talent on that team was/is equal to a typical Snuffer squad.
    How many first rounders did snuffer have this year?  How many titles
    did he bring home?  (Hint, begins with a "Z" and rhymes with "hero"
    
    So you made a point - and even if it is a 'win' - as you claim, it
    still shows that Bob has produced 3 *times* the amount of chameenships
    (in less time, BTW) with his *talent* then the snuffer has.  So, you
    *proved* once again who the bested coach is (Hint, begins with "K" and 
    rhymes with a word used to describe Snuffer's title count - "Slight")
    
    JD
15.400"Dean Smith is a Great Coach." - Bob HuntRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 16 1991 17:2722
    > Yet another in a long chain of so-called "points" that you've tried
    > to make only to fatally fling yourself off the cliff of reason
    > instead.
    
    The only mistake I made was to even acknowledge the stupid athlete vs.
    talent rathole, cause it had absolutely NOTHING to do with the issue at
    hand.  Pat Kennedy sez BobKnight consistently gets the necessary
    athletes to play man-to-man, and he (Kennedy) doesn't.  MrT is constantly 
    moaning about IU's lack of athleticism.  Period.  End of discussion.  
    If you don't agree with Kennedy, fine.  Like I said, you already know more
    than a HoFer, so this is small-time stuff ...
    
    
    re: Cap
    
    Who says I was trying to paint UNC in a positive light?  I knew
    full-well somebody would point out the 1 'L' was in the Final 4.
    For the record, FSU lost by a mere 5 points to a thoroughly loaded
    UCLA team which was led by Bill Walton. 
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.401I bow to the masterSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Wed Oct 16 1991 17:3213
15.402ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 16:4650
    Clear differentiation between talent and athleticism, in terms a hoops,
    using salient examples from these parts:
    
    1) Scott May (great shooter, tough D, good footwork boxing on boards
       but no jump and morbidly slow-footed)
    
    2) Scott Skiles (talent galore, but small and not expecially quick, best
       ball handler outta Hoosierland since Larry)
    
    3) Steve Alford (allegedly 6-2, allegedly 180 lbs, again morbidly slow,
       no jump, not much strength, but could shoot and pass very well, also
       learned how to drive to hoop)
    
    It's ironic that Pat Kennedy's comment would be used, for going into
    the NCAAs last year every analyst in the world predicted doom for IU in
    against Florida State cuz FSU was loaded with fleet-footed musclebound
    jumping jacks.
    
    They had athleticism all over Indiana.  Everybody said this for two
    weeks leading up to the game.  But, after soaring out to an 18 point 
    lead with mindblowing leaps, slams, whirlybird drives, and steals...
    Indiana wore them down and beat them by 16 or so with superior talent
    (i.e., dribbling, passing, shooting, boxing out, moving without the 
    ball, and so on).
    
    So Pat Kennedy's the last guy in the country to talk about needing 
    athletes to win.
    
    Also, I never said Indiana has no talent, but I'm persistently accused
    of having said that.  Again, show me a major conference champion who 
    started a 6-2 white guy ex-backup guard at power forward.  Hillman's
    role was unprecedented at that level and it happened cuz Indiana usually
    has big holes in its lineup.
    
    Take Matt Nover, for instance.  PLEASE.  Here's a guy who has no biz
    in big-time hoops from talent standpoint, not to mention the fack that 
    he's a forward by size and training, and he started at center all last
    year for Indiana.  Against good teams he'd usually fold up like a cheap
    suit and be replaced by forward Eric Anderson in the middle, thus forcing
    Indiana into a 3-guard offense.  This happened all last year.
    
    Show me a single squad from the all-talent programs (SyrExcuse, Gougetown,
    Star Hells, Zona, Runnin' Rabble, Michigan, etc.) where almost every year
    they have no one to play a key position.
    
    I could go on, but the facks are there and you must recognize them, at
    least, if not the truth a the matter.
    
    Big10 Tom
    
15.403ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 22 1991 17:1317
    Bad news on the Hoosier Hoops front: F/G Pat Graham is down for
    4-6 weeks with a broken bone in his foot.  Earlier this summer
    Damon developed a stress fracture caused by athlete's foot, which
    is apparently healed but these things have a way of coming back
    sometimes.  Less publicized but most worrisome of all is Eric
    Anderson's ongoing battle with lower back troubles, but he's been
    able to play in pain so far...
    
    Over at Illinois, F Andy Kaufmann, probably the Illini's second best
    player, and definitely their best offensive player, is out for the
    year for academic woes.
    
    Voshon Lenard, Minnesota's most touted recruit since Clem Haskins
    took over, is blowing minds in workouts.  There's already talk that
    this 6-6 jumping jack will go pro after two years.  We'll see.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.404CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 22 1991 17:404
15.405From Tuesday's Cincinnati EnquirerDYPSS1::ROPERBillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnightWed Oct 23 1991 23:019
    IU lands prep star
    
       TERRE HAUTE, Ind. - Steve Hart, a senior guard at Terre Haute South
    High School, said he will sign a basketball letter of intent next month
    with Indiana University.  Hart, who averaged 13.6 points a game and
    helped South to the state tourney Final Four last spring, said he
    picked the Hoosiers over Indiana State.
    
     - Wildcat
15.406Good press for coach KnightDYPSS1::ROPERBillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnightTue Oct 29 1991 17:5032
    From December Issue of SPORT magazine.
    
    NO STARS FOR KNIGHT
    
         Bobby Knight was enshrined in the Basketball Hall of Fame after
    winning three NCAA titles at Indiana, but you can't give him any medals
    for producing NBA stars.  Only one, Isiah Thomas, has had an impact in
    the pros.  North Carolina's Dean Smith, on the other hand, can claim
    some credit for Michael Jordan, James Worthy and Brad Daugherty.
    
         Is there something wrong with Knight's coaching?  Does he ruin his
    players?  The short answer is "No."
    
         According to Marty Blake, head scout for the NBA, Bobby Knight
    recruits good--not great--players who will fit into his system.  Smith
    however, starts out with the very best talent available.  In other
    words, Knight does a lot with the guys he gets.
    
         "Bobby Knight doesn't recruit players with the idea of developing
    them into NBA stars," says Blake.  "He just wants role players to help
    him win games at Indiana.  It's not his job to supply us with NBA
    talent."
    
    Your welcome MrT :-)
    
     - Wildcat
    
    P.S. - The same issue of SPORT had this to say of Rick Pitino.
    
     - "Rick Pitino, perhaps the finest basketball coach on earth, ..."
    
    	BRAVO PITINO!
15.407HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Oct 29 1991 18:127
 >   P.S. - The same issue of SPORT had this to say of Rick Pitino.
 >   
 >    - "Rick Pitino, perhaps the finest basketball coach on earth, ..."
    
       I get the feeling you're leaving something out here. Maybe the rest
    of a sentence or paragraph. Couldn't begin with 'but' now could it?
                                       Denny  ;^)
15.408DYPSS1::ROPERBillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnightTue Oct 29 1991 23:1426
    >> I get the feeling you're leaving something out here.  Maybe the rest
    >> of a sentence or paragraph.  Couldn't begin with 'but' now could it?
    
    C'mon now Denny!  How could you think that of ole Wildcat?  I
    understand that there may be some unscrupulous noters in SPORTS that
    have tried to pull the wool over many an eye in the past, but not the
    'Cat!
    
    'Cause I don't want to develop a Mr(T)arnished SPORTS reputation, here is
    the missing text.
    
    Story was relating the differences between Pitino and his NY
    background, and the current crop of 'Cats.
    
    "Rick Pitino, perhaps the finest basketball coach on earth, is as
    N'Yawk as a $35 cab fare.  John Pelphrey, Deron Feldhaus and Richie
    Farmer are kids from Eastern Kentucky towns not likely to even have
    cabs.  Somehow, they've meshed at the University of Kentucky--along
    with a couple of big-city talents, New York power forward Jamal
    Mashburn and Indianapolis point guard Sean Woods--to make the Wildcats
    leading candidates to be the success saga of this college basketball
    season."
    
    HTH's
    
     - Wildcat 
15.409Thanky, Wildcat. You're one classy dude.ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureWed Oct 30 1991 12:521
    
15.410Would you like your face eggs Benedict Arnold?ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Oct 30 1991 13:1216
    One a the greatest disappointments I ever experieced was the other
    day in the infamous keeling fields a 17.  
    
    Here we have a Big10 main, Doug Ross, submitting a detailed forecast
    a the Almost Close Conference.  Fine.  But, only last year he was
    seen barking like a dog singing vile praises for Snuffy Smif'.  He
    told me he humiliated himself like that willingly cuz ACCrook had 
    agreed to cut him in on that crooked contest such that he'd git tix
    for the sold-out (pun intended) Almost Close redundantly meaningless
    money-grubbing spectacle in Charlotte.
    
    But, only months later, he's crossed the line.  Doug Ross is clearly
    no longer a Big10 main.  He analyzes and writes reports on the ACC
    and he's MIA on the Big10 - The All-Time Greatest Conference.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.411GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Oct 30 1991 13:218
    
    See, Denny, you wuz right!  Pitino is as "N'Yawk as a $35 cab fare".  
    The attentive reader would have immediately seen the connotation 
    for "finest" to mean "in actuality, Big Apple-overhyped".  Very
    perceptive, sir!    
    
    glenn
    
15.412IU recruiting summary (so far)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 30 1991 13:5833
    Well I must be in a particularly generous mood today.  First I dig up
    recruiting info for Mildcat (tm), now for MrT.
    
    The following represents IU's early commitments so far.
    
    Enjoy,
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    
    
WILLIAM LIEBERMAN	5-8, 175, Greenwich, CT (North)

o	A classic overachiever who gets it done with hard work.  He can't
	run or jump and he's certainly not quick.  Voted 'Most Cerebral'
	at under 17 AAU's.


JOHN WALTERS		6-10, 135, Nashua, NH  (Central)

o	Future is all ahead of this kid.  Hard worker whose projected
	to grow several more inches.  Early commitment to Indiana.  Not 
	quick, fast, or a leaper, but should fit in well in Bob Knight's
	system.  (Five Star)
	

KYLE NEVE		6-4, 310, Cincinnati, OH (Moeller)

o	Hard working rebounder who pulled down close to 20 board per
	game at the prestigious Under 12 AAU's.  Hasn't grown much since 
	then, but should make an impact wherever he goes!  Lacks quickness
	and is quite slow, but makes up for it with smarts!
    
15.413AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightWed Oct 30 1991 14:074
JOHN WALTERS		6-10, 135, Nashua, NH  (Central)

    	Yikes this kid will make Manute Bol look like a bodybuilder!
15.414RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 30 1991 14:126
    True /Don, but remember: Manute Bol has gone onto a fairly profitable
    NBA career.  I suspect Walters will end up CBA-bound like most Knight
    products ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.415nitSTAR::YANKOWSKASThis *IS* my day job...Wed Oct 30 1991 15:539
    re .412, .413:
    
    There is no Central High in Nashua, just one public high school (Nashua
    High) and a Catholic high school (Bishop Guertin).   However there is a
    Central High in nearby Manchester, perhaps that's what the publication
    meant...
    
    
    py                                               
15.416Must be from Manchester ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 30 1991 16:014
    Yup, that must be it py.  Tanks.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.417Smoke and Mirrors, I guess ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 30 1991 16:228
    BTW, neither Lieberman, Walters, or Neve are listed in my Poop Sheet's
    list of the top *200* HS prospects in the USA.
    
    Hate to admit it, but it appears I've been wrong.  Bob really *does* do
    more with less.  :^(
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.418No egos in that bunchANGLIN::KIRKMANMoving is HELLWed Oct 30 1991 18:248
    I saw the words "slow", "can't jump", "not quick", "hard working" all
    over that Indiana recruiting report.  Sounds like the typical BobKnight
    team, they should fit right in.
    
    After all, isn't what coaching (as opposed to recruiting) is all about
    - getting more out of your players.
    
    Commander Scott
15.419Nope. Not a single ego.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 30 1991 18:3413
    Right Commander.  Couldn't agree more.  I predict Bob will get
    *maximum* mileage outa that bunch.
    
    Ya know, Dean's warned me (and those like me) in the past about not
    paying any attention to those recruiting ratings, and the more I think
    about it, the more I think he's right.  I wish we'd_a signed one of 'em
    but no, Dean only sticks with the top-notch studly types, whilst Poor 
    Bob gets the leftovers.
    
    Oh well,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.420Will they enter as grad students?CSOA1::SIMPSON_TThu Oct 31 1991 19:0710
	re .412

	Funny stuff, Chris.  And nicely done.  Some people *APPEAR* to have
	believed it.

	Any word on how Montross is looking in pre-season?  He may be a 
	traitor to the true cause :^), but I'm still curious.

tom
15.421Sound a SilenceANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Nov 01 1991 10:455
    I'm not saying anything in here teal rap master D. Benedict Ross,
    Purdue main, musters a little interest in his home Conference and
    note...
    
    Big10 Tom
15.422DUGROS::ROSSI came, I saw, I leftFri Nov 01 1991 17:1438
>  <<< Note 15.421 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" >>>
>                             -< Sound a Silence >-
>
>   I'm not saying anything in here teal rap master D. Benedict Ross,
>   Purdue main, musters a little interest in his home Conference and
>   note...

Okay, MrT... you try moving to ACC land and get any info on the Big 10.

Here's the pre-pre-preseason prediction for the Big 10:

1) Indiana 	- Anything less than second place in the conference and
		  a Great 8 NCAA finish will mean Bob underachieved.  Cal
		  Cheaney is exceptional.   Everyone else will play their
		  assigned roles.   If Damon Bailey gets even a little
		  bit better, and frosh widebody stud Henderson lives up
		  to expectations, this team should be a test for Duke for
		  the title.   Yes, they are lacking in size and big athletes,
		  but that's Bob's fault.


2) Ohio State   - They faded last year but should be strong again this
		  year, especially if Lawrence Funderburke stays in school.
		  Jimmy Jackson will hopefully continue to improve.


Rest of the bunch...


Iowa
Michigan - best recruiting class since Dean's 1990 :-)  Steve Fisher better
	   win with this bunch or he's toast.
Illinois
Minnesota
Michigan State
Purdue
Northwestern
Wisconsin
15.423ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Nov 05 1991 12:3319
    >frosh wideobyd stud Henderson
    
    Main you ARE outta touch!
    
    Alan Henderson is the exact opposite a a widebody stud.  Alan (a 
    Nat'l Honor Society student, btw) is what they call painfully
    skinny.  He's got skeels awright, but not a the nuclear widebody
    mogambo studly nature: great hands, nice touch, excellent jump
    timing, good feet, long arms, etc.
    
    Perhaps you mistook Alan for Glenn Robinson, who IS truly a widebody
    nuclear stud.  Glenn has NBA written all over his massively musculated
    bod, and has a mean streak to go along with his sneering Alonzo
    Mourning-style turnaround jumper and he likes to make people fly thru
    the air when he boards.  But it'd be hard to mistake for Glenn, cuz
    Glenn couldn't muster the minimum SAT scores and will sit out prop48
    (and IU ain't never had no prop48 meat).
    
    Big10 Tom
15.424Reality check.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Nov 11 1991 18:3021
    re: .-1  (MrT)
    
    In the words of my hero Ronnie Reagan, ...  
    
    "There he goes again."  :^(
    
    MorT would have us believe that Henderson is some geeky kid with thick
    glasses who gets sand kicked in his face when he goes to the beach and
    his shot slapped back whenever he dare step inside with the Big Boys.
    
    Unfortunately this fails to wash with the simple fact that Alan
    Henderson was ranked in every Top 10 recruting list in the USA and,
    more often than not, in the Top 5.  (Along with Glenn Robinson.)
    
    This makes it two (2) years in a row Bob has nailed one of the premier
    forwards in the USA, and the Hoosiers are ranked in everybodies Top 5.
    Failure to win the Big10 and reach the Final 4 would have to be
    considered underachievement, IMHO.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.426HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Nov 12 1991 11:393
       We've known about Chris' political problem for years Hawk. You
    shoula axed, we'd have helped.
                                      Denny
15.427Reality check revisitedCSOA1::SIMPSON_Tgive me your sweet soul dreamWed Nov 13 1991 00:3643
15.428Revisited reality check revisitedRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Nov 13 1991 11:1912
    tom,
    
    Me_thinks you're forgetting about IU's signing of Top 5 Lawrence
    Funderburke, who Bob chased off.  (Nothing new here.)  Interesting that
    he chose to go to Ohio State.  In the ACC this wouldn't happen, cause
    there's a gentleman's agreement among the coaches to not take each
    others transfers.  For instance, Clifford Rozier wanted to go to FSU,
    but Pat Kennedy honored this agreement and told Cliffy to look
    elsewhere.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.429Time flies, don't it?CSOA1::SIMPSON_Tgive me your sweet soul dreamThu Nov 14 1991 00:3318
Chris,

	Didn't (couldn't!) forget the wandering one, but he was recruited
two years before Henderson.  Two premier forwards in *3* years - definitely
a minor nit.

	There's a similar agreement in the Big Ten, but it's broached on
occasion.  Two other instances I can think of are Derek Holcomb transferring
from Indiana to Illinois 10-12 years ago, and Brad Sellers going from 
Wisconsin to Ohio State in the mid-80s.  

	The word from around the Ohio State campus, btw, is that Funderburke
is playing well enough to look like a POTY candidate for next season.  Have
to wonder if he can keep his head straight for that long, though.

	HOW'S MONTROSS?

tom
15.430No, he's not gonna transfer back to Indiana. ;^)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Nov 14 1991 10:5322
    > HOW'S MONTROSS
    
    Dunno.  Last year he averaged 5.8 ppg, 4.2 rpg.  Considering he was a
    freshman who was only getting around 15 mpg, that's not bad.  Also
    consider that he played by far his best basketball toward the end of
    last season, especially on defense.  
    
    It's a plus that he made this years Pan Am team but, for whatever
    reason, received almost no playing time.  He was relegated to 3rd
    string, behind Laettner and Peplowski.  :^(
    
    Montross is a solid player and, despite Doug Ross' dire predictions, I
    think he'll develop nicely.  No predictions on numbers this year but,
    assuming he stays injury-free, he'll see plenty of minutes.  That alone
    should get him toward double-digit rebounding numbers.  Dean sits down
    with every player after the season and tells him what he wants him to
    work on in the off-season.  He told Montross he wanted him to work on
    his offensive moves, particularly posting up on the block.  We'll see
    soon how much improvement he's made!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.431GophsANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Thu Nov 14 1991 11:469
    One guy to watch this year may be Voshan Leonard of the Gophers.  Clem
    Haskins recruited him out of the Detroit area and everyone is gushing
    over him locally.  I haven't seen him yet, but I've heard he was ranked
    in the top 25 freshman recruits.  Some of the people that have watched
    him are saying things like he's the best player on the roster right now
    to he'll be gone in two years. (NBA)
    
    
    Spud
15.432ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightFri Nov 15 1991 17:5748
    Voshon Lenard was ranked in the top dozen in those lists I saw.
    
    On Indiana, they're definitely overranked right now, but could fulfill
    a top4 ranking by the year's end.  The reason they're so highly ranked
    is that the sportswriters know that Bob is loaded with talent for the 
    first time in a decade, and the ranking reflects his abilities as a
    coach more than the team.  
    
    As to the team, as Mr. Simpson so nicely positioned, they're gonna have
    to rely on two raw freshmen on the front line... hardly a proposition
    for being the 2nd best squad in the nation at this point.  Beyond that, 
    if Lindemann (who's not a blue chipper) stumbles against the big studs 
    then it's back to either forward Eric Anderson outta position and
    undersized in the post, or the awful Matt Nover, who was barely even
    recruited outta H.S. and also outta position and undersized in the post.
    
    More may depend on Lindemann than Henderson.  If he flops then IU is
    back to people outta position on a team that's small to begin with.  
    Also, against the nuclear widebody stud squads like Michigan and Iowa 
    they'd like to move Calbert to off-guard and beef up along the front
    line (Cheany's not very good at defense and reboudning inside, although
    he's improved).  Henderson could help there if Lindemann flops by either 
    going into the post (again, outta position) or by playing forward while
    Anderson or (ugh) Nover plays the middle.
    
    The other non-2nd best aspect of this squad is that none of their guards
    are talented outside shooters except PGraham, who may miss the year.
    Damon's ok, but needs to improve.  This is a team dominated by PGs.
    
    Also, the injury situation is somewhat shaky, especially with Anderson's
    chronic bad back.  Then there's Damon's broken foot.  And then PGraham's
    broken foot.
    
    re: Funderburke
    
    No "gentlemen's agreement was broached."  Bob worked with Ohio State's 
    coach (who agreed that he should be forced to sit out a year to get his
    scrambled haid together) and encouraged Lawrence to return to his home
    town and play for the Buckeyes.
    
    Should be a close game tonight against UCLA.  Whether or not the Hoosiers
    lose tonight they'll drop down into the 10-15 ranking range as their
    holes and youth manifest themselves.  They could be 2nd best by year's 
    end... IF the injury situation doesn't go bad and Lindemann-the-project
    holds up.
    
    Big10 Tom
             
15.433DYPSS1::ROPERBillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnightSat Nov 16 1991 14:255
    Beautiful piece of coaching last night by the General.  I suppose
    Calbert's gonna be a better man later on for setting out the most
    crucial part of the game!  Beautiful Mr. Humble, simply beautiful.
    
     - Wildcat
15.434Horrid coaching effort by Knight.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Nov 18 1991 10:5612
    Gotta agree with Wildcat on this one.  Why Knight saw the need to
    humilate Cheaney is beyond me.  (Me thinks it's his *HUGE* ego, which
    sees the need to constantly puff his chest and show his players who's
    in charge ...)  Give the UCLA kid credit for playing some great
    in_yo_face defense.  Give Knight credit for removing any possibility
    for Indiana to win the game by sitting Calbert down for practically the
    entire 2nd half ...
    
    Alan Henderson looks good though.  The real thing for sure ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.435Not particularly suprising, but there are signs...ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightMon Nov 18 1991 12:3248
    While you guys are busy attempting to prove that Bob cain't coach
    (he of the 3 Nat'l Championships and 10 Big10 Titles in 20 years)
    Knight was busy preparing his team to have its best chance at both
    his conference and the NCAAs:
    
    * Calbert deserved to sit and he knew it.  After two years he's still
      unable to unleash that lightning first step of his to help out on
      D or fill the rebounding lanes.  Vitale did several replays of IU
      defensive breakdowns, and they were two culprits: Nover, who cain't
      move and has no business even as a scrub on a Div. IA squad... and
      Calbert.
    
      He and the team will be better for his pine time.  Also, it was a 
      blowout anyway and so a perfect teaching opportunity.
    
    * It was devastating to see Nover starting ahaid a Lindemann.  But,
      after seeing Lindemann, it was apparent that IU is at least a half
      season away from having a serviceable (i.e., grade C) center.
    
    * Damon, who got more hype coming out of H.S. than anybody since Lou
      Alcindor, was overmatched.  Time and again he penetrated only to be
      stripped of the ball or have in jammed down his throat.  Being haidy,
      he adapted by staying outside.  Trouble is, this is a poor outside
      shooting team unless Eric and Calbert go outside, and so the blowout
      deepened.
    
    On the bright side:
    
    * While he may not be a center, Alan Henderson is the best big main 
      recruited to IU since Landon Turner matriculated in '78.  Not saying
      much, true, but that makes it all the more significant.
    
    * Kudos to Bob for redshirted his quickest and best defensive player
      Chris Reynolds so that he could learn how to shoot.  Coulda used him
      against UCLA, but it was best for his future.
    
    * The Hoosiers, purportedly the 2nd best squad in the nation, were able
      to keep the blowout from getting outta hand against what has to be
      the most physically talented team in the nation.  UCLA not only has
      widebodies crammed down to the end of the bench, they've got a great
      young point guard in Madkins (?) and a fine senior big main in McClean.
    
    It's unlikely that Indiana'll be able to play with a loaded U. Kaintuck,
    but they should be able to stay with Louisville and ND and the others and,
    hopefully, fashion some form of floor game (i.e., rebounding & D) and
    find an outside shooter by the beginning of the Big10 season.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.436Not one of Bob's better efforts, for sure.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Nov 18 1991 13:0117
    The thing I find so shocking about the Hoosiers game was that this is a
    team basically intact from last year.  The only big change is the
    addition of someone even MrT acknowledges to be a mega-talent.  (If
    memory serves, last years Hoosiers were ranked in the Top 4 at season
    end before stumbling in the tournament ...)
    
    BTW, I disagree that the game was out of reach when Calbert hit the
    pine.  Behind by 10-15 points with most of the second half to play
    ain't squat but, as Vitale pointed out, Bob has failed miserably at
    incorporating the 3-point shot into his offense, despite having a
    plethora of fine outside shooters.  (3 point shooting can get you back
    in a game *quick*, but Friday night Bob's mega-ego seemed content at
    humiliating officials and players alike, as opposed to concentrating on
    a 'W'.  Go figure ...)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.437ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightMon Nov 18 1991 13:1849
    >despite having a plethora of outside shooters.
    
    Well, you cain reinvent reality all you want, but the most glaring
    weakness of the Hoosiers, IMNSHO, isn't the lack of a center, it's
    the total lack of outside shooting.  GGraham is a great athlete, but
    coming out of H.S. his flat-arch shot was so bad that this past summer
    they reworked his delivery from the ground up, and are hoping he'll 
    show some shooting skills with it.  PGraham, whom experts regard as
    IU's only quality outside shooter, has a broken foot.  Even Bob, the
    best coach in the history of the game, proved unable to heal PGraham's
    fracture.  And even if this miracle worker coulda, PGraham is a acute
    WMD victim and has trouble developing good shots and carries a big cost
    in IU's main-to-main D scheme..  Reynolds' shot is so bad that he and 
    Bob agreed that he'd redshirt this year and rework *his* shot from the 
    ground up like GGraham.  Jamaal Meeks has never been touted as a shooter, 
    but cain cain the medium range jumper if open.
    
    Then there's Damon.  He has yet to emerge as a good outside shooter. 
    His shot selection and shooting mechanices look near perfec, but he
    hasn't yet shown the consistency required to get the permanent green
    light from Bob.  In fairness to Damon, he played SF in H.S. in a very
    rural league, and is still learning.
    
    Halfway into last year the experts agreed that IU's outside shooting
    was suspect except for Calbert and Eric.  
    
    I say that this paucity of perimeter shooting outweighs the absence of
    a grade C middlemain cuz Indiana has succeded before with a 3-guard
    lineup... but with outside shooting.  
    
    Bob will thrash his lineup mixing PT among his guards, losing games and
    hurting his precious overall winning percentage, until he finds a combo
    that works.  At the same time he'll struggle to fashion the young Todd
    Lindemann into a serviceable guy in the paint, changing some shots and
    grabbing some bounds and picking up some trips to the FT line.
    
    Until then, as I said before the UCLA game, look for Indiana to drop
    into the teens in the rankings as they demonstrate an inability to play
    with the Final Four contenders (i.e., Duke, Kaintuck, Arkansas, SyrExcuse,
    Iowa, UCLA, et al) and a tendency to have close games against grade B
    teams.
    
    2nd ranked Indiana is on the cusp between grade A and B, but they should
    improve with experience and Bob's player development program.  Right now
    they look like they should finish 3rd in the Big10 behind Iowa and the
    maize and blue...
    
    Big10 Tom
    
15.438Teach in November; Win in March ...SCNDRL::HUNTFrom the young man in the 22nd row ...Mon Nov 18 1991 13:199
I watched most of the Indiana-UCLA game, too, and I had some of the same 
thoughts about Indiana that T has stated.   They'll be a powerful team come 
season's end.   Alan Henderson is the real deal.

Nothing wrong with Calbert Cheaney grabbin' some pine in November.  He'll 
be on the floor in March.   And I still like Damon Bailey.  He could play 
for my team any day.

Bob Hunt
15.439CNTROL::CHILDSI get wild, it's Automatic, somebody shut the doorMon Nov 18 1991 13:2010
    > Friday night Bob's mega-ego seemed content at
    > humiliating officials and players alike, as opposed to concentrating on
    >  a 'W'.  Go figure ...)
    
    Kind of Like Snuffy refusing to play zone at home against Duke or getting
    tossed from the Kansas game with 35 ticks left and congratulating the
    oppossision...


    
15.440"More ..." - Bob HuntRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Nov 18 1991 13:5129
    > Teach in November, win in March
    
    Why not teach *and* win in November, teach *and* win in March?  Nowhere
    is it written that these two (2) items are mutually exclusive.  I
    personally don't subscribe to the notion that Bob is a master of this
    anyway.  He's managed to peak masterfully on three (3) season-ending
    occasions.  He deserves and receives mucho credit for this.
    
    But what about the other 17 years?  What about all those disapointing
    early exits?  What about *last* year, when he had a team in the Top 4
    in the country.  They then struggled to win games against Coastal
    Carolina and FSU before getting blown away by Kansas.  Guess Bob's
    November teaching wasn't good enough, although he sure was piling on
    the W's ...
    
    I just can't understand the need to bench your best player, a preseason
    All-American, in a game you can still win.  What does this teach him
    that can't be taught in practice?  (Other than how to be humiliated
    on national television ...)   I also find it hilarious that MorT, whose
    been exclusively complaining about IU's lack of a big man as their
    achilles heel, suddenly sez they don't have a perimeter game.  Haw! 
    Bailey can shoot and make 3's.  So can Andersen.  Clearly Cheaney can. 
    That's 3 outa 5 players who are OUTSTANDING outside shooters.  Let's
    not talk about how your bench scrubs can't shoot - let's talk about how
    your prime time players CAN shoot.  (When Knight let's 'em play, that
    is.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.441ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightMon Nov 18 1991 14:3464
    >What about all those early exits?
    
    What about 'em?  He's had less than most coaches.  Certainly far 
    fewer than Snuffer.
    
    >He's managed to peak masterfully on three (3) season-ending
    >occasions. 
    
    Translated in to plain English: He's managed to win three National
    Championships in 20 years; while Snuffy, with oodles more talent (just
    look at his NBA All-Stars) has managed only one in 30 years, and needed
    a end-game gift from a stoned guard to avoid squandering *that* one.
    
    >let's not talk about... scrubs
    
    I went over the outside shooting skills of all the guards on the team.
    You said the Hoosiers were loaded with outside shooters, and I showed 
    you that they don't really have one, except maybe PGraham, who's hurt,
    and even *he* shot only about 30% last year from outside last year.
    
    Damon Bailey has not shot well from outside.  Yeah, he cain cain the 
    trey, and has some great outside shooting games, but overall he's a
    debit right now from the arc.  You fallaciously criticize Bob for
    poorly integrating the trey into his game plan, but fail to mention
    that he's unleashed many trey attempts when he had the shooters.  He
    doesn't this year, so he's better off sticking with the inside game.
    
    Btw, two of the three fine outside shooters you mention (Eric and
    Calbert) are needed inside given the dire situation in there (IU tends
    to get badly outrebounded, did last year).  True, with Alan Calbert 
    will be more freed up to go out to the corner.  False, until he
    improves his J no way is Bob gonna give the green light to Damon and
    that's fine by me.
    
    Sitting Calbert was deserved and necessary.  The Hoosiers were overmatched
    and Cheany was doing a horseheet job with the floor game.  If he persists
    at hurting his team by not helping out on D and rebounding, he could end
    up seeing a lot more pine time.
    
    As for FSU, about half the pundits last year predicted that the Seminoles
    would beat IU cuz a their vastly superior physical talent.  Sure 'nuff,
    IU was intimidated with magambo blocked shots, bounds, and jams, and
    went up by 17.  But then, their poor hoops skeels showed up as the Hoosiers
    gutsily stuck to their game plan and didn't freak out.  IU won by 18 or
    so, with a "coaching swing" of about 35 points in less than a quarter.
    
    UCLA has the same suite of nuclear widebodies that FSU had, but these
    kids knokw how to play the hoops, especially Madkins and McClean. Ditto
    for Kansas, whom IU would have trouble keeping up with even now.
    
    Face it: the Hoosiers are vastly overrated due to their coach's vaunted
    capabilities.  They're chock full a holes.  As Dickie-poo intelligently
    observed, Bob cain't work his magic on this flawed squad until at the
    earliest halfway through the season.
    
    Meanwhile, Michigan will be preening the "best incoming freshman class
    ever."  And Iowa is loaded, with a fine center and some tough front-line 
    guys.
    
    Here's hoping for another "masterful season-ending peak!"
    
    Big10 Tom
    
    
15.442Poor IU. Can't rebound. Cain't shoot. Cain't play 'D'. Cain't jump. Cain't RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Nov 18 1991 15:2324
    You've reached new lows on the Intellectual Honesty front, MorT.  (And
    that's sayin' something, *believe* me!)  
    
    How you can look us in the eye (figuratively speaking) and say that
    Florida State had tons more talent than last years Hucksters is
    amazing.  (I suppose Coastal Carolina had more too, right?)  How you
    can bad-mouth IU's talent, when that very same talent took them to a #1
    seed in the NCAA Tournament, is equally amazing.  (They've got more this
    year than last, with the addition of the studly Henderson.)
    
    I also think you're giving UCLA too much credit.  They've got talent,
    but they haven't gotten over their old problems of selfishness, poor
    shot selection, and lack of intelligent play.  No way should they have
    blown out the highly ranked Hoosiers.
    
    BTW, I ran into my HoosierHead (tm) neighbor yesterday.  First words
    outa his mouth (spoken crisply) were 'I'm not talking about The Game.'
    Luved it!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.443AXIS::ROBICHAUDN.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptusMon Nov 18 1991 15:395
	MorT, let me get this straight.  The same scribes and pundits who 
vastly overrate IU's talent are right on the money when assessing UNC's 
talent?

				/Don
15.444CAM::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Mon Nov 18 1991 15:4448
I was at a get together to watch the Giants game yesterday.

One of the fellows had seen Bob Knight speak recently (or maybe last
year, I couldn't quite tell) at a Massachusetts showcase for new talent
of whatever.

After the speakers, they had the assistant coaches get up and answer
questions.

One boob in the audience, of course, asks about The Chair.

The ass't coach says

		"Geez, here we go again.  Everybody always asks
		 about the chair.  I really don't see what the big
		 deal is.  Bob saw an old lady on the far side of
		 the court who didn't have a chair, and being
		 the gentleman that he is, slid one across for her"


I guess there was also a story about Bob coaching Jordan in da Olympics.
The US was playing Canada and we're beating them up pretty good.
Jordan in particular was having a great game.  Come halftime, Knight had
to go in and make some kind of speech to fire up the team for the
second half.

On his way in, he really couldn't think of anything else to say so he
decided to pick on Jordan (who was playing best of anyone).  So, Knight
starts in on Jordan:

		"Dammit Michael, I haven't seen you set ONE pick out there
		 tonight.  Oh you're shooting well, and passing well,
	 	 but dammit, get into the game.  I wanna see you setting
		 some PICKS in the second half"

Well, it turns out Michael had recently read a quote from Knight were
Knight said that Jordan was probably the quickest player he'd ever seen.
So Michael replies:

		"Yeah, but Coach, I was reading how you think I'm the
		 quickest player you've ever seen.  I was setting pick
		 out there.  I was just setting them so quick you
		 couldn't see 'em"

Well, Knight just broke out laughing and had to leave the locker room....



15.445ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightMon Nov 18 1991 15:4641
    FACT: IU was a poor rebounding poor outside shooting team last year.
    
    FACT: IU was the weakest team in the middle in the conference last year,
          and, given that Matt Nover is probably the worst Div. IA center in 
          the game right now, they IU may indeed be the weakest team in the
          middle in the country.
    
    You're right, with the addition of superstar Alan nothing has changed
    from last year.  And, based on their 29-5 record last year, another 
    thing that won't change is their being overrated, this year starting
    out at #2, dropping down to #18 or so, and then - as Bob's teaching and
    experience catch up, moving up to #6-8 or so.
    
    Dick Vitale said UCLA is loaded, not me.  Dick Vitale also said that in
    order to compete at the highest level they needed to get some play from
    the center position.  The most popular upset prediction in the pre-NCAAs
    prognostication was FSU over IU.  This was in USA Today and on ESPN,
    poor MrT had nothing to do with it.  
    
    What's your point?  That talentless/skilless Matt Nover is a big-time
    center?  That a team that got outrebounded with regularity last year is
    loaded in the middle?  That a team that shot very poorly from the arc
    last year is a great perimeter shooting team?
    
    That' Bob cain't coach?
    
    Here's my point: IU shoulda been preseason ranked at about #15, cuz 
    that's about what they are.  They'll get better as Alan catches on. If
    big Todd Lindemann catches on they'll get a LOT better and in a hurry.
    No matter what they do they'll be a poor guard-shooting team and in the
    Big10 that means 4 or 5 losses cuz they'll be zoned to death.
    
    And that with 3-for-20 and 10-for-20 Bob's coaching credentials are
    beyond dispute... He's the best ever.
    
    Your capacity for twisting things and refusing to allow the Truth is
    beyond me.  I call 'em as I see 'em, and I see 'em as they are.  This
    is why I've been referred to in here thousands a times as "MrT, SPORTS'
    Objective Analyst."
    
    MrT
15.446Come clean MrTEARRTH::BROOKSToo legit ! Too legit to quit !Mon Nov 18 1991 15:5610
    MorT (what doesn THAT mena anyhow ?), Dick Vitale also picked IU as the
    best in the country.
    
    As did SPORT and INSIDE SPORTS ...
    
    So tell us, are all of these people lying ? And like Slasher says, if
    in fact they overrate IU's talent, then they must be doing the same for
    UNC right ?
    
    Dr Midnight
15.447ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightMon Nov 18 1991 16:0046
    >The same scribes and pundits who vastly overrate IU's talent are
    >right on the moneyw hen assessing UNC's talent?
    
    Nice try, Hairy Smithna, but you fall short in a ridiculous manner:
    
    1) Forget the writers and lookit Bob and Snuffer.  Each rated Eric
       Montross as the top center two years ago.  Snuffy got him cuz Bob
       had to pay the price to make sure that his crippled PF didn't get
       screwed by Eric's shyster-father.  
    
       So, at the center position both coaches are on-record.
    
    2) IU has more talent now than at any time since '81, when they had a
       true superstar in Isiah.  I'm on record having said that.  
    
       But I'm also on record for having said that they had two gaping holes
       last year: No center, poor perimeter shooting, and a sorry lack a
       depth  at the forwared position.  In other words, after Funderburke
       left, Bob's first highly touted recruiting class in over ten years
       was Calbert and a half dozen poor shooting point guards.
    
    What's changed this year is that with Alan they now have some depth at the
    forward spot.  What hasn't changed is the center problem (note: Snuffy
    has a passle of 7 footers) but that maybe, could, possibly, potentially,
    change if Todd Lindemann improves, and the perimeter shooting problem,
    which will definitely improve somewhat with Alan freeing up Calbert, but
    won't improve to the point where IU is a big-time hard-to-beat Duke/UCLA/
    Arkansas/Carolina/SyrExcuse/et al level unless at the very least Damon
    Bailey learns how to hit the outside shot. 
    
    He's young, he might.  Lindemann's young, and totally inexperienced at
    not having a one foot height advantage, but he might improve to.
    
    Right now IU is looking for a shooting guard and a center.  This is not
    the mark of a top team.  I'd rank IU at about #18 right now.  
    
    Carolina has no holes to speak of.  They have the center Bob wanted to
    be his first true star center ever.  They have one a the hottest outside
    shooters ever.  They have a widebody who cain play either SF or PF. 
    They have H.S. A-As falling off the end of the bench.
    
    Only thing they don't have is a great coach, a Bob-style coach.
    
    But who does?  [IU]
    
    MrT(erribly Objective On This)
15.448ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightMon Nov 18 1991 16:0828
    >are all of these people lying ?
    
    No, they're paying tribute to Bob's genius, a tribute to his capacity
    for "meaningless end-of-season peaks" which has nothing to do with 
    where they are right now.
    
    They're also ignoring the FACK that Indiana is starting at center a guy
    who was projected all along to be an end-of-bench backup PF with poor
    skills and little H.S. experience.  The loss of Montross, then Funderburke,
    and other big-time centers that Bob has failed to recruit saw to Nover's
    unexpected role.
    
    And they're ignoring the FACK that IU was a poor rebounding team last 
    year and the FACK that IU was, with the exception of Calbert, was a poor
    perimeter shooting team last year.
    
    Who's wrong?
    
    I'll stand by my preseason prediction.  Indiana's gonna lose a lotta
    games (4-8) and will slump to somewhere in the 15-20 range (unless the
    insanity rankings persists) and will take a run at a Big10 Title that
    may or may not work out (but wouldn't work out if the Big10 wasn't
    rebuilding this year) and will end the regular season at about #6-8 
    and will maybe make the Sweet Sixteen but certainly is only a longshot
    to make the Final Four - where they'd have no chance at all against
    more veteran teams with no gaping holes to speak of.
    
    MrT(ruthful Even When It's Unpopular)
15.449MorT proven hopelessly dishonest [again]RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Nov 18 1991 16:1312
    > Here's my point: IU shoulda been preseason ranked at about #15,
    
    Let me get this straight.  IU finished #4 in the USA last year.  IU
    lost NOBODY from that team.  IU added one of the top 5 players in the
    USA.  And you say they should be preseason #15.
    
    Here's *my* point:  You're fulluv_it.  (BS, that is.)
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.450DYPSS1::ROPERBillyMartin,WoodyHayes,BobKnightMon Nov 18 1991 16:2416
    'T, you're definitely a "LEGEND IN YOU'RE *OWN* MIND" :-)
    
    Allow me to correct you on your assesment of UK's "loaded" team.  This
    team is the same team plus Jamal Mashburn that Pitino inherited two
    years ago.  He inherited a team of nobody's.  Pelphrey, Feldhaus,
    Woods, Farmer, Brassow ... Not exactly a group of blue-chippers here. 
    Eddie Sutton had the same team plus Chris Mills, Leron, Ellis, and Sean
    Sutton, and went something like 13-18 his last year!  Pitino comes in
    and takes the group minus Mills, Ellis, and Sutton and nobody over 6-7
    and goes 14-14 the first year, and 22-6 last year!  I only wish Pitino
    had the talent IU has the last couple of years.  
    
    BTW, this years freshman class at UK was rated number 17 I believe by
    Bob Gibbons.
    
    Wildcat 
15.451AXIS::ROBICHAUDN.E.Patriots-FootballusInterruptusMon Nov 18 1991 16:334
    	MorT, you never answered my question just babbled on for about
    50 lines or so.  You should follow a career path in politics.
    
    				/Don
15.452ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightMon Nov 18 1991 19:4036
    >Let me get this straight.  IU fnished #4 in the USA last year.
    
    Oh, you got it straight alright.  Straight that joe such a pathological
    lie that even if wanted to (and you certainly do not) joe cain't stop:
    
    1) IU got blown out of the Sweet Sixteen.  Thus, it's reasonable to 
       call them #16 based on last year.
    
    2) IU, as you have been panting heavily all day long, had trouble with
       Coastal Carolina and FSU, which factoring for the draw might even 
       cause one to conclude that they weren't even in the top16 based on
       real world results at last year's end.  
    
    3) IU added a great, but extremely green, young forward.  Not a great
       rebounder or power player, but a truly fine player.  Meanwhile,
       their two main holes (no off-guard, no center), remain unsolved.
    
    4) And most egregiously, you persist in fallaciously implying that I'm
       comparing last year's March edition to this year's.  I aim not.  All
       I'm saying is that last year's team was flawed and this year's team
       has the same danged flaws, and that it'll take a coupla months to 
       find out whether this team cain be considered a contender to make
       the Final Four.
    
    They could emerge as such a contender, but I rather doubt that they
    will.  While they have a lotta horses, they just don't seem to have the
    right horses.  Unless, of course, Todd Lindemann surprises the living 
    hail outta me, which could happen and which I of course *hope* happens...
    
    No, I'd trade IU's lineup for Carolina's lineup in a New York minute.
    They have the center IU lusted for but didn't get cuz a their classy
    behavior, in Lynch they have a forward who'll go farther in the NBA 
    than Eric Anderson will, in Hubert they have a guard who cain actually
    light it up from afar, and they have... experience.
    
    Big10 MrT
15.453IU poses mega-matchup problems to almost every opponentRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 19 1991 11:1924
    > IU got blown out of the Sweet Sixteen.  Thus, it's reasonable to
    > call them #16 based on last year.
    
    Hardy-Har-Har!  Not so fast, MorT.  IU underachieved *badly* in this
    years tourney, just like they've underachieved *badly* in past years. 
    With Bob it seems you either get a marginal degree of overachievement
    or (more often) a similar degree of underachievement.  (In the cases of
    Cleveland State and Richmond, we're talking exponential
    underachievement.)
    
    IU is clearly a legitimate Top 4 club last year.  I've yet to see a
    poll this year that didn't put them in the Top 4.  They're the
    favorites to win the Big 10 this year, and rightly so.  For whatever
    reason they fell flat on their faces against an admittedly well-playing
    UCLA squad.
    
    BTW, when comparing UNC with IU I'd hasten to point out we don't have a
    player who even comes close to the ability of Cheaney, who's about as
    sweet_a offensive talent as you'll ever wanna see.  Andersen impresses
    the heck outa me with his shooting and all-around game.  And your
    stable of guards leaves Carolina flat-out in the dust.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.454ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKightTue Nov 19 1991 12:4938
    ACCrock, you're capacity for staring down Reality is, well, almost
    Dan-like in its unabashed majesty:
    
    * These "early round exits" you keep huffing and puffing about are
      much less frequent that you'd have us believe, in fact, less frequent
      than in a certain Star Hell program that'll go unnamed.
    
    * Yes, Cheaney's a supreme offensive talent.  He also may soon be a 
      substitute unless he starts playing an at least mediocre floor game 
      with the D and the 'bounds.
    
    * We'll probably never know how good a college player Eric Anderson 
      coulda been, cuz on D they routinely rotate out the awful Nover and
      rotate in Anderson to belly up against true centers, which just as
      routinely causes him to end up in foul trouble (as against UCLA),
      tire out (as against UCLA), or reinjure his chronic lower back (as
      against Kansas).
    
    * The great guard talent you keep talking about is certainly real in
      terms of speed, jumping ability, quickness, etc.  It is, alas,
      certainly not there in terms of jump shooting.
    
    >With Bob it seems yo either get a marginal degree of overachievement
    >or (more often) a similar degree of underachievement.
    
    If by "marginal degree of overachievement" you imply that he hasn't 
    attained the "consistent excellence" that CoachK sneeringly congratulated
    Snuffy for during that hilarious pre-Final Four interview last year, I 
    cain only clutch my Bob Doll and weep with thanks.
    
    On the other hand, you must somehow reconcile this fantastic assertion
    with the fact that Bob has one a the highest overall winning percentages,
    one a the highest NCAA tourney winning percentages, and 10 Big10 Titles
    in 20 years.
    
    Good luck, 'Crockmeister!
    
    Big10 MrT
15.455Big Ten preseason scheduleFORTSC::MOKSat Nov 23 1991 00:44184
From: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Big Ten Pre-conference Schedules
Date: 21 Nov 91 23:05:00 GMT
 
Thanks to the many who contributed to this.  Home games in CAPS, road
games and road tourneys in lower case...
  
Penn State
 
n25    illinois
n27    BUFFALO
d2     american
d6-7   first bank classic (milwaukee)
         (Marquette, Columbia, and St. Francis)
d14    BOWLING GREEN
d18    drexel (palestra)
d21    georgia (kuppenheiner classic - atlanta)
d27-29 west palm beach classic (miami)
         (Miami, Fl., Marshall, and George Washington)
j2     ohio state
j7     james madison
j11    MORGAN STATE
j13    BROWN
j16    marshall
j18    MIAMI, OH.
j21    butler
j25    penn (hershey)
j27    TOLEDO
f2     MARYLAND-BALTIMORE COUNTY
f3     DUQUESNE
f8     old dominion
f10    temple (hershey)
f17    maryland-baltimore county
f20    LAFAYETTE
f24    OLD DOMINION
m2     AMERICAN
 
 
Illinois
 
n25    PENN STATE
n30    NE LOUISIANA
d3     TENNESSEE STATE
d6-7   ILLINI CLASSIC
         (vs. Hawaii, and SC State vs. Washington)
d10    temple
d21    MARYLAND-BALTIMORE COUNTY
d23    missouri (st. louis)
d30    illinois-chicago
j4/5   CONNECTICUT
 
 
Indiana
 
n15    ucla (springfield, ma)
n30    BUTLER
d3     NOTRE DAME
d7     KENTUCKY (Indianapolis?)
d10    VANDERBILT
d13-14 INDIANA CLASSIC
         (vs. Boston U., and Central Michigan vs. UT-Martin)
d21    st. johns
d27-28 HOOSIER CLASSIC (Indianapolis)
         (vs. Texas Tech, and Indiana State vs. Kent)
j4     cincinnati
 
 
Iowa
 
n23    MARYLAND-EASTERN SHORE
n26    WESTERN ILLINOIS
d3     DRAKE
d6-7   AMMANA-HAWKEYE CLASSIC
         (vs. Army, and Bowling Green vs. Louisiana Tech)
d10    nothern iowa
d14    iowa st.
d27-28 tribune invitational (florida)
         (South Florida vs. NE Illinois, and Butler vs. Iowa)
j4     CENTENARY
 
 
Michigan
 
d2     detroit
d7     cleveland state
d9     CHICAGO STATE
d12    EASTERN MICHIGAN
d14    DUKE
d16    CENTRAL MICHIGAN
d21    RICE
d28-30 red lobster classic  (florida)
         (Florida vs. Virginia Tech, and BYU vs. Michigan)
 
 
Michigan State
 
n25-27 maui invitational (hawaii)
         (Chaminade vs. Providence, Arizona State vs. Rice, 
          Arkansas vs. Minnesota, Lamar vs. Michigan State)
d4     NEBRASKA
d7     dayton
d14    DETROIT
d17    ILLINOIS-CHICAGO
d21    CINCINNATI
d27-28 SPARTAN OLDS CLASSIC
         (vs. Austin Peay, and Sienna vs. Stanford)
 
 
Minnesota
 
n25-27 maui invitational (hawaii)
          (Chaminade vs. Providence, Arizona State vs. Rice, 
           Arkansas vs. Minnesota, Lamar vs. Michigan State)
n30    HOWARD
d2     YOUNGSTOWN STATE
d11    AKRON
d14    alabama-birmingham
d17    DETROIT
d19    memphis state
d23    WEBER STATE
d27-28 far west classic (portland)
         (Oregon vs. Minnesota, and LaSalle vs. Oregon State)
 
 
Northwestern
 
n22    ILLINOIS WESLEYAN
n30    COLUMBIA
d2     VANDERBILT
d4     tulane
d14    NORTHEASTERN
d16    IDAHO STATE
d21    loyola of chicago
d27-28 tribune classic (tempe)
         (Arizona State vs. Brown, and Creighton vs. Northwestern)
j6     CHICAGO
 
 
Ohio State
 
n26    MIAMI-OHIO
n30    CHICAGO STATE
d4     OHIO UNIVERSITY
d7     OREGON STATE
d14    HOWARD
d18    UC-SANTA BARBARA
d21    southern cal
d29    AMERICAN
j2     PENN STATE
 
 
Purdue
 
n21    BALL STATE (Pre-Season NIT)
n23,27,29  (Possible Pre-Season NIT)
d2     indiana state
d6-7   BOILERMAKER CLASSIC
         (vs. Prairie View A&M, and Central Michigan vs. UW-Green Bay)
d15    GEORGIA
d17    STETSON
d21    butler
d23    SW MISSOURI STATE
d28    loyola-chicago (rosemont)
j2     north carolina
j4     WESTERN MICHIGAN
 
 
Wisconsin
 
n23    LOYOLA-CHICAGO
n25    SE MISSOURI STATE
n30    portland
d3     SMU
d5     CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE
d7     COSTAL CAROLINA
d11    nebraska
d13    SAM HOUSTON STATE
d21    HOWARD
d27-30 rainbow classic  (hawaii)
         (Hawaii vs. Navy, Alabama vs. Bradley,
          Fresno State vs. Villanova, Washington State vs. Wisconsin)
j2     MARQUETTE
 
15.456Big Ten update 11-21-91FORTSC::MOKSat Nov 23 1991 00:4426
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten Update (11-21-91)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1991 23:16:43 GMT
 
Upcoming Big Ten games:
 
Nov. 21:	Ball State at Purdue, NIT, 6:30 pm CST, ESPN
 
Nov. 22:	Illinois Wesleyan at Northwestern
 
Nov. 23:	Maryland-Eastern Shore at Iowa
		Loyola-Chicago at Wisconsin
		Possible action for Purdue in NIT (site TBA)
 
Nov. 25:	Penn State at Illinois
		Michigan State vs. Lamar; Minnesota vs. Arkansas at Maui
		SE Missouri State at Wisconsin
 
Nov. 26:	Western Illinois at Iowa
		Miami-Ohio at Ohio State
		Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
 
Nov. 27:	Buffalo at Penn State
		Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
		Possible action for Purdue in NIT at New York
15.457Big Ten update 11-22-91FORTSC::MOKSat Nov 23 1991 00:4552
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
From: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Subject: Big Ten Update (11-22-91, and it's even Friday)
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1991 21:15:53 GMT
 
Results and Upcoming Big Ten games:
 
Nov. 20:	MICHIGAN STATE 92, Athletes in Action 71
 
Nov. 21:	MICHIGAN 100, Athletes in Action 93 (Romar had 45 for AIA!)
 
		PURDUE 56, Ball State 48:  If you love scrappy, hard-nosed
		defense, then you loved this game.  Purdue's D forced
		BSU into all sorts of calamities, mostly very poor shot
		selection (the FG % shows it) and inability to get off
		shots much before the clock expired.  BSU's D forced
		Purdue into a boatload of turnovers.  There's a silver
		lining for both - Purdue got very positive contributions
		from some of it's "question marks", namely Matt Waddell,
		Cuonzo Martin, and Brandon Brantley.  Also, Woody Austin
		seemed to get himself loosened up as the game wore on.
		If Purdue can play defense like this every time, especially
		against a guy like Chandler Thompson (who looked silly at
		times), then the team will have chance most nights.  For BSU,
		the team has nowhere to go but up, and should do quite
		well in the MAC and beyond...  The halftime score was
		26-24 Purdue, and the second half was 30-24 Purdue.  The
		final margin was the games largest.  Waddell hit some
		key shots and generally looked good.  So did Ian Stanback,
		whom Craig Riley could emulate for hustle...  A sellout of
		14,123 at Mackey Arena.  The new floor paintjob looks
		great!
 
Nov. 22:	Illinois Wesleyan at Northwestern
 
Nov. 23:	Maryland-Eastern Shore at Iowa
		Loyola-Chicago at Wisconsin
		Purdue at Oklahoma State in NIT action (no ESPN due to
		their football commitments on Saturday)
 
Nov. 25:	Penn State at Illinois
		Michigan State vs. Lamar; Minnesota vs. Arkansas at Maui
		(the Mn-Ark game is on ESPN at 3:30 pm Central!!!)
		SE Missouri State at Wisconsin
 
Nov. 26:	Western Illinois at Iowa
		Miami-Ohio at Ohio State
		Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
 
Nov. 27:	Buffalo at Penn State
		Michigan State/Minnesota at Maui
		Possible action for Purdue in NIT at New York
15.458Good news, bad newsCSOA1::SIMPSON_Tgive me your sweet soul dreamMon Nov 25 1991 22:3314
	Update on Hoosier basketball:

	* Chris Reynolds has been un-redshirted.  According to
 	  Knight:  "He's our best guard, and this team can't play
	  without its' best guard".

	* Damon Bailey's been out since last Wednesday with a
	  nerve injury.

	* Pat Graham is recovering nicely, but they won't be able
	  to make a decision on whether or not he can play this
	  season for another couple of weeks.

tom
15.459RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOREG. PENNA DEPT. AGR.Tue Nov 26 1991 12:4810
    
    From USA Today:
    
    " I like to think that every experiment Edison tried didn't result in
    the light bulb."
    
    - IU Coach Bob  Knight, changing his mind about redshirting junior
    guard Chris Reynolds after a season-opening loss to UCLA.
    
    JD
15.460Classic Knight ... Why he's the bestSCNDRL::HUNTFenestracryptographer WannabeTue Nov 26 1991 14:0019
Bingo !!!   And *THAT* is why Bobby Knight is the best college basketball 
coach in the country followed up very closely by Mike Krzyzewksi ... and 
Roy Williams coming on incredibly fast and strong.

They keep on experimenting and tinkering and refining and perfecting things 
until they get it right ... and then they tinker with it all over again.   
True *CRAFTSMEN* who are never quite satisfied with success.

And way, way, way back there in the way, way, way back of the bus is the 
Snuffer ... refusing to call time outs, refusing to play zones, refusing to 
put his senior masons on the bench and, finally and pathetically, 
abandoning his team when it needed him most desperately.

Remember the Kansas players after the Carolina game ... "Everybody knew all 
the plays so we just improvised better than they did."   Do you think 
Thomas Edison might have "improvised" just a little bit to get that ol' 
lightbulb burning ???

Bob Hunt
15.461HoFers ride in the back of the bus? Hardly.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 26 1991 14:4414
> Remember the Kansas players after the Carolina game ... "Everybody knew all 
> the plays so we just improvised better than they did."   Do you think 
> Thomas Edison might have "improvised" just a little bit to get that ol' 
> lightbulb burning ???

So tell me then Mr.Hunt, how come Bobby Knight, "the best college basketball
coach in the country", couldn't find a way to defeat this same Kansas team?
Or at least avoid getting blown out?  

Don't tell me.  No talent, right?


- ACC Chris
    
15.462No brainerSCNDRL::HUNTFenestracryptographer WannabeTue Nov 26 1991 15:3815
- So tell me then Mr.Hunt, how come Bobby Knight, "the best college        
- basketball coach in the country", couldn't find a way to defeat this same 
- Kansas team? Or at least avoid getting blown out?  

That's an easy one.   Knight himself stepped up to the podium after 
Indiana's loss to Kansas here in Charlotte and admitted that his team had 
come as far as it was expected to go.

Knight, by his own admission, had the talent to get to the Sweet Sixteen 
and no further.   As the Region's No. 2 seed, they were overrated ... again 
his own words.

No such words comin' outta Snuffy, were there ???

Bob Hunt
15.463CAMONE::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Tue Nov 26 1991 15:497
>No such words comin' outta Snuffy, were there ???

Bob, it's hard to talk wif a chicken bone stuck in your throat....


hth,
'Saw
15.464No brain Ketch? I agree ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 26 1991 16:1019
    > That's an easy one.  Knight himself stepped up to the podium after
    > Indiana's loss to Kansas here in Charlotte and admitted that his
    > team had come as far as it was expected to go.
    
    Hah!  In my very best Church_Lady voice, ....  "Isn't that
    **CONVIENIENT**!"
    
    I can only imagine what the weasel throngs woulda said if the 4th
    ranked Tar Heels (we were ranked 5th, BTW.  IU was 4th) had gotten
    blown out in the Sweet 16 and Dean had said "I didn't expect us to 
    go any farther".  You woulda had a field day.
    
    As it was Dean overachieved in almost everybodies book, taking a very
    young and inexperienced bunch to the Final 4 before barely losing to
    the identical team.  Yet Knight's a genius and Dean rides in the back
    of the bus.  Get_a clue, Ketch!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.465RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOStop Bush/Quayle Wetlands Massacre..Tue Nov 26 1991 16:2018
    
    Chris -
    How come when talking about last year - you always say Smith took a
    young, inexperienced team, blah, blah blah
    
    BUT 
    
    When talking about this year - you talk about all the senior leadership
    lost from last year's team.
    
    So, which is it, Soup:
    
    Was last year's team young, or did it have senior experience and
    leadership?  
    
    Is this year's team young again?
    
    JD
15.466Last year was a masterpiece by Dean, IMO.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 26 1991 16:3314
    Both teams were/are young, JD.  Last years had five (5) freshmen and
    six (6) sophomores.  True we did have three (3) senior leaders, but it
    was still a young team.
    
    This year we've only got 1 senior, but only 1 frosh.  The overall
    experience is better (Dean sez practice is going *much* better than
    last year cause everybody already knows the plays at least) despite
    the lack of senior leadership.
    
    I will say that in '92-93 and '94-95 we should be a very experienced
    team, with lots of seniors and juniors.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.467AXIS::ROBICHAUDPats 16 - Bills 13! WOODYWARD!!Tue Nov 26 1991 16:468
15.468More ...SCNDRL::HUNTFenestracryptographer WannabeTue Nov 26 1991 16:5018
-    As it was Dean overachieved in almost everybodies book, taking a very
-    young and inexperienced bunch to the Final 4 before barely losing to
-    the identical team.  Yet Knight's a genius and Dean rides in the back
-    of the bus.  Get_a clue, Ketch!

Yeah, he overachieved big time, didn't he ...   The No. 1 seed in the East 
plays the Nos. 16, 9, 10, and 12 seeds and you call that *OVER*achieving ???  
The first seed he saw in an upper half of any bracket was Kansas and we all 
know what happened there.

Should Indiana have lost to Kansas ???   No, probably not.   But those two 
teams were *MUCH* more evenly matched than the Tar Heels and Kansas.   

Carolina, with The Teacher at the helm, should have had few problems 
dealing with The Student from Lawrence.    Yet, ol' Teach had his rock 
chalk Jayhawk handed to him, didn't he ???

Bob Hunt
15.46963,000 bankruptcies lasted year but it's still not a recession ...SCNDRL::HUNTFenestracryptographer WannabeTue Nov 26 1991 16:537
 - True we did have three (3) senior leaders, but it was still a young  
 - team.

Spin control at its igKnorrant best.

Bob Hunt

15.470Still "More ..."RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Nov 26 1991 17:2119
    Well said, bro_/Don.  Well said.  I saw where Fox went for something
    like 25 the other night, 16 in the 2nd quarter alone!  
    
    re: LeftWingBob
    
    Desperately trying to goad me into_a political debate, eh?  Wail take 
    it to SOAPBOX bub, before I sick_a moderator on ya.
    
    As to Dean under/overachieving, it's a rare event to reach the Final 4
    and consider the season a disapointment.  Let's not make the false
    assessment that just cause there were alot of upsets in the East that
    it takes away from the achievement.  The teams we played (except for
    1st round Northeastern) had all beaten somebody good or they wouldn't
    have advanced.  The fact that we didn't fall victim to an upset like
    all the other high seeds is an accomplishment Carolina should be
    congratulated for.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.471Is that excuse number 3 or 4 from the UNC Excuse Book?SHALOT::MEDVIDWild Hearted SonTue Nov 26 1991 17:4014
>The fact that we didn't fall victim to an upset like
>    all the other high seeds* is an accomplishment Carolina should be
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>    congratulated** for.
     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    *Duke?  UNLV?
    
    Fall victim to an upset?  You mean like Kansas beating Indiana?  The
    same team that beat UNC?  Let's see, you criticize Knight for the same
    choke job you laud** Smith for.  Oh, OK, this fits into "ran into a hot
    team" excuse.  Sorry.  For a minute there I didn't understand.
    
    	--dan'l
15.472Knight lost to Kansas. So friggin' what!GUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Nov 26 1991 18:1526
    
    I'll be honest: I don't think Knight had his team ready for that
    Kansas game.  A team that comes out and plays a sloppy, lackluster,
    go-through-the-motions game like that one is a reflection, however 
    minor, on the coach for that particular outing.  Even considering 
    the talent level, Indiana played as poor a game as Carolina did 
    against Kansas later.  So we'll make no excuses for Knight last 
    season, even if they're still coming in by the bushelfull from the 
    other side ("System versus System ==> sloppy game"  Haw haw haw!)
                           
    I'd even be willing to bet that there have been entire recruiting
    classes of kids for whom Knight's total hardass approach just flat 
    didn't work.  They don't want to buy into his system, don't want to 
    commit, and Knight won't compromise his very high principles.  I 
    have no problem with that.  Still doesn't take away from the kids who 
    do commit, and have pulled down three titles in the last 20 years 
    because of the level of their commitment to Knight's demands.  Still 
    doesn't explain away all of the wailing and bawling coming out of the 
    Smif' camp, and the paucity of titles produced by the Rev's lenient, 
    "go-ahead-and-do-whatever-pleases-you-JR", soft-on-standards-and-
    discipline approach.  Never hurts to peel away all the bogus 
    platitudes and gratitudes and examine the ol' bottom line, now 
    does it?
    
    glenn
    
15.473ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Nov 27 1991 11:3143
    What keelt IU in the Kansas game was 1) they didn't have a center
    to go up against Kansas' strong front-line, leaving an exhausted,
    hurt, and outta position Eric Anderson frozen as they pounded to
    the hoop on drives and rebounds, 2) abysmal outside shooting, and
    3) the inablity to solve the outside shooting problem by hitting
    medium shots and/or close shots.  A physical big guy woulda hit the
    inside shots, of which they had plenty, but the rejections and tough
    D Kansas put on them stopped that approach early.
    
    Of course, MrT predicted all that, and said they were vastly overrated
    as a #2 seed and 4th ranked.
    
    This year's Hoosier edition's loss to UCLA exhibited some of the same
    weakness with the poor outside shooting.  But their inside game will
    be better with Alan Henderson and Lindemann.  Trouble in that game 
    comes from relying on those two while still totally inexperienced, 
    especially Lindemann, who until that day played againsslow 6-2 
    centers in the Michigan UP.  But they'll get better, a lot better. 
    Henderson will FINALLY give them an inside defensive presence. 
    Lindemann looks extrememly green, but should be servicble with his
    floor game by year's end and could be a good player all 'round by 
    next year or his junior year with development.
    
    The lousy outside shoong is of grave concern.  Last year they won
    a Big10 Title against a nuclear widebodied by short Ohio State front-
    line by going inside with their quickness.  Now OSU has a top ranked
    center, and so does Michigan, and Iowa's big main is a year older and
    coming into his own.  Meanwhile, Minnesotwill feature its most talented
    lineup since the Trent Tucker/Randy Bruer daze, with the 7-2 Bruer-like
    Bob Martin looking like he'll come into his own with (finally) guards
    who cain fill it up and who cain penetrate, and some big-time but
    youthful talent along the baseline.
    
    IU's not a dominating team, they're missing a couple of ingredients.  
    They'll be zoned to death in the Big10.  If they don't solve the
    outside shooting problem they're hurting  Even if they do they'll still 
    lose some based on having two frosh in featured roles.
    
    Watch out for young Minnesota.  They played Arkansas tough the other 
    day and they beat Providence last night.  They're shooting for 4th in
    the Big10 and a tourney bid, and it looks like they'll do it.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.474Stop it already !EARRTH::BROOKSToo legit ! Too legit to quit !Wed Nov 27 1991 16:251
    Boo hoo hoo ... poor IU ....
15.475The answer, folks, is that he wasn't playing badly.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Nov 27 1991 16:349
    Yea, I'm cryin' too, but the tears are from laughter.  MorT analyzes
    the IU-UCLA game and fails to even mention how badly Cheaney played,
    despite the fact that his idol-coach sat his All-American butt down for
    almost the entire 2nd half! 
    
    Haw haw haw!!!!!!1111111
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.476ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Nov 28 1991 11:5183
    I'll igKnorr the catcalls from the Peanut Gallery and take comfort
    in knowing that my review is, as always, both objective and a good
    indicator of the team's success, and that events will prove me out
    to a.... T.
    
    re: Big10
    
    With State roughing up a admittedly short-handed Arkansas and a good
    showing by the young but unusually talented Gopher squad, it looks 
    like the Big10 will be very deep this year.  Michigan is rolling out
    what's being called "the best freshman class ever," Iowa will be good
    but inflexibly coached by Dr. Malpractice, Ohio State has a first team
    All-America guard (JJ) and a fine point guard (Baker) and others from
    last year to go with transfer Lawrence Funderburke who was thrown off
    his H.S. team but was still considered the best schoolboy center his
    senior year, and Indiana will be tough despite the outside shooting
    and center voids (great coaching) and could become dangerous by year's
    end.  
    
    Illinois lost their best offensive player Andy Kaufmann to dumb-bunny
    disease but has Deon Thomas and some others, but will be down.  Ditto
    for Purdue, who lost Glenn Robinson - the best player to come out a 
    Hoosierland since Larry Bird (he smoked Alan Henderson in the IHSAA
    Title game - to Prop48.  Northwestern will be Northwestern, Wisconsin
    will be spotty on the talent level but will win games with the outside
    shooting they always seem to have for some reason.
    
    Here's how it should turn out in the ONLY big-time hoops conference
    with a real Title to offer:
    
    1.  Ohio State
    2.  State
    3.  Indiana
    4.  Michigan
    5.  Iowa
    6.  Minnesota
    7.  Purdue
    8.  Illinois
    9.  Wisconsin
    10. Northwestern
    
    Of course there's a real chance that haid case Thunderburpe will become
    more than disciplinarian Randy Ayers cain put up with dropping State to
    centerless status and into 3rd or 4th in the standings.  But having a
    great one like JJ backed by superquick trey specialist Baker and NOW a
    widebody in the middle is compelling.
    
    Jud Heathcoate's great recruiting class has left him with many milirems
    of nuclear widebody meat to parlay.  Jud cain coach, but last year was
    a mystery.  Peplowski healthy, nuke forwards, and dashing guards will
    be hard to handle.
    
    Bob unredshirted Chris Reynolds in a desperation move, and it should 
    help.  The key here is either GGraham and/or Damon learning how to
    shoot with consistency.  It's likely Bob will go more with a penetration
    game looking for dish-offs to take advantage of Henderson in the paint.
    Nover may stay in the middle if he cain minimize the damage he does,
    but it might pay off better if he suffers through the huge and problematic
    learning curve young Todd Lindemann is facing.  Indiana will be good
    and bad from game-to-game but should come on turning into the home
    stretch.  
    
    Michigan is ultratalented and very young.  Combine that with "coach"
    superstupe Steve Fisher, who'll let 'em run and stay chaotic on both
    ends, and you've got a wild card on your hands.  This will be a streak
    shooting team that could be very dangerous in the tourney.  
    
    Iowa better rebound people to death, cuz everybody saw how easy it is
    to make mincemeat of this team by passing over their obsolescent full
    court press with the clinic CoachK put on Malpractice in Minneapolis 
    last March.  Good center though.
    
    Minnesota will feature freshmen around 7-2 stiff-but-serviceable Bob
    Martin.  Jumping Jack Voshon Lenard is great.  They have two soph 6-8
    forwards who cain 'bound and one is smooth with the ball in close. 
    They have maybe the best outside shooter in the league in a frosh from
    Martinsville IN (John Wooden's home town) who should light it up.  Weak
    point guard from North Carolina who should lose his job during the
    season.  Clem teaches rebounding and D, and he has his first talented
    team ever.  Look for the Golden Goofs to post some upsets.  I may not
    wear the colors to Williams this year.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.477go buckeyes...ROCK::GRONOWSKIthe dream is always the same...Mon Dec 02 1991 17:554
    
    I saw that the Buckeyes struggled over the holidays... what was
    the final 111-46 or something like that... Must have been playing
    a Division II team or a team from the SWC.
15.478STRATA::CAPPELWed Dec 04 1991 10:3712
    
    Calbert Cheaney sure looks like a different ballplayer the last two 
    games(rebounding, playing D, moving without the ball).  
    
    I really didn't think he would survive after Knight sat him during 
    the basketball game with UCLA.  How in the world could any 21 year
    man, take such humiliation(insert major sarcasm)?
    
    I'm sure glad that Knight did not let him continue to play poorly, as
    it now looks like Calbert is ready to take his game to another level.
    
    Cap
15.479Yawn.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 04 1991 12:0214
    re: .-1
    
    This was predictable.  Every good game Cheaney has from here on out
    we'll be reminded about that genius BobKnight and what a brilliant move
    he made to embarass the kid on national TV.
    
    Well bull.  The kid was a **preseason All-American**.  He's
    mega-talented.  His success now has ZILCH to do with Bob's stupid
    benching, which might've cost him a 'W'.
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.480STRATA::CAPPELWed Dec 04 1991 12:1819
    Possible scenario:
    
    Player A reads all his press clippings, thinks he is a superstar and
    stops doing all the little things that made him a pre-season
    All-American(i.e moving without the ball, playing team defense, 
    rebounding positioning, etc).
    
    Coach quickly recognizes this and benches player, hoping that it will 
    cause Player A to go back doing the things that made him great.
    
    Of course since we don't know any of the circumstances that led up to
    the benching(i.e events that happened in practices, falling behind on
    schoolwork, not working hard in practice or any other number of things)
    so we really can't say if the benching was justified or not, can we?
    
    But if Dean would have benched him we wouldn't have heard a peep from 
    you would we(except for saying what a brilliant move he made).
    
    Cap
15.481ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Dec 04 1991 13:1915
    If Calbert is "mega-talented" then please reconcile his paltry career
    statistics as a small forward for rebounds, blocked shots, and assists
    in comparison with other star fowards (Larry Johnson might be a good
    example to take, he was considered "mega-talented" and is making good
    on that claim in the NBA now).
    
    Cheaney is one a the finest pure offensive players Bob's ever had.  But,
    as a complete player, he has a looooong way to go to measure up to other 
    top Bob-players such as Isiah, Ted Kitchel, Steve Green, Scott May, et
    al.
    
    You don't know what you're talking about.
    
    MrT
    
15.482RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMacaulay Culkin makes me puke!Wed Dec 04 1991 13:419
    Well, Chris' whole tirade has been predictable.  What Calvin should do
    is go out, find hissself a good women, and hit her upside the haid a
    few times.   Then Bob should do nothing about it.  That will build
    *REAL* character in old Calvin.   Then, somewhere down the road, in a
    *BIG* game and Calvin is stinking up the joint, shooting with the
    accuracy of a sawed-off shotgun, Bobby should jest let him fire away -
    damn the final results.  Now - that would be genius.
    
    JD
15.483Suffice to say Cheaney's the only one who'll be humiliated...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 04 1991 14:109
    > You don't know what you're talking about.
    
    Then neither does Streets & Smith, which rated Calbert Cheaney first
    team All-America.  There were only a total of ten (10) players
    selected, BTW, and you don't become an All-American by not playing
    defense, not having a floor game, and not rebounding.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.484CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalWed Dec 04 1991 14:1910
 Cap, Dean could only sit Calbert for 10 minutes a game given that he's
 a junior. Next year it will be 5 minutes a game. It's part of the 
 system. It's the way to recruit...

 "Well my son if you come to UNC I promise you that every year I will
  increase your playing time so as to improve your pro value. Why look
  at my track record." - Dean Smith...

 mike
15.485CSC32::J_HERNANDEZJust say 'HO'Wed Dec 04 1991 14:411
    What would it be like if Santa was a Hoosier?
15.486RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMacaulay Culkin makes me puke!Wed Dec 04 1991 14:5310
    Soup -
    
    You are way off base in your remark that you don't become an
    all-american if you don't play defense, pass, rebound, etc.  Most folks
    simply look at offense.  There have been players that have been
    all-american that were pretty dang one-dimensional.  Was Pete Maravich
    an All-American?  I surely don't remember ol' Pete playing much
    Defense, or crashing the boards...
    
    JD
15.487RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 04 1991 15:019
    re: JD
    
    Are you comparing Calbert Cheaney's offense with Pistol Pete's?!
    
    If so, MorT's right.  Somebody around here don't know what they'b
    talking 'bout.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.488The Pistol - One of the Greats.DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Wed Dec 04 1991 15:438
    Regarding the Pistol.
    
    When you can average 40 ppg, I don't think any coach in the land is
    gonna be to concerned about whether you're the best defensive whiz in
    the world.  Also, last I checked, guards didn't get graded on their
    ability to "crash the boards".  Unless of course your MAGIC! :-)
    
    WILDCAT
15.489ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Dec 04 1991 16:1533
    You're mixed-up again, ACCrisp.  I'm fully aware of S&S and other
    mags having posted Calbert as a 1st or 2nd team All-America.  So
    what?  I was addressing the efficacy of Calbert's floor game in 
    connection with his much deserved benching, which, btw, Calbert
    said he deserved and accepted with understanding.
    
    History is littered with A-A's who were offense-only players.  You
    know who they are.  If you don't, just follow the NBA's media during
    their camps.  Then you'll read quotes from coaches scouts and GMs
    talking about how the newly-acquired A-A "needs to learn how to play
    defense" or "how to fill the passing lanes" or "how to maintain 
    position underneath" or "how to help out on weak side D" or "how to
    make the adjustment to full time man-to-man" or "how to hit the glass
    on offense" or "how to fight his way through picks" or "how to set
    picks" and so on.
    
    Calbert was judged and benched based on his real-world performance with
    the floor game.  He's been in and out of the dog house both with the
    press and the Indiana media for two years now for disappearing on
    defense and on the boards.  He's also been busted for trying to showboat
    and trying to go coast-to-coast with the ball, which he tried against
    Ohio State only to have it stripped at midcourt thus blowing last year's
    double OT loss to a superior Buckey team.
    
    In sum, he's been sat down before and he deserved it.  Based on the
    fack that Calbert understands he's screwing up and Bob's track record
    for player development, I look for a well-rounded Cheaney by his senior
    year.
    
    I believe this cuz if Bob could mould the gawky slow-footed Jay Edwards 
    into a serviceable defensive guard and rebounder anything's possible.
    
    Big10 Bigot Tom 
15.491here's the proofRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMacaulay Culkin makes me puke!Wed Dec 04 1991 16:3436
Just to refresh the memory. 

>================================================================================
>Note 15.483                    Big Ten Basketball                     483 of 490
>RHETT::KNORR "Carolina Blue"                          9 lines   4-DEC-1991 12:10
>       -< Suffice to say Cheaney's the only one who'll be humiliated... >-
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    > You don't know what you're talking about.
>    
>    Then neither does Streets & Smith, which rated Calbert Cheaney first
>    team All-America.  There were only a total of ten (10) players
>    selected, BTW, and you don't become an All-American by not playing
>    defense, not having a floor game, and not rebounding.
    
    
>    - ACC Chris
 
So Chris - notice - you make assertion about what makes an all-american.

>Note 15.486                    Big Ten Basketball                     486 of 490
>RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Macaulay Culkin makes me puke!"   10 lines   4-DEC-1991 12:53
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Soup -
    
<    You are way off base in your remark that you don't become an
<    all-american if you don't play defense, pass, rebound, etc.  Most folks
>    simply look at offense.  There have been players that have been
>    all-american that were pretty dang one-dimensional.  Was Pete Maravich
>    an All-American?  I surely don't remember ol' Pete playing much
<    Defense, or crashing the boards...
    
>    JD

Notice - no comparison to Cheaney (who isn't even mentioned).


15.492after correcting a mistake...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMacaulay Culkin makes me puke!Wed Dec 04 1991 16:3527
              <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 15.490                    Big Ten Basketball                     490 of 491
RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JO "Macaulay Culkin makes me puke!"   21 lines   4-DEC-1991 14:16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Chris -
    
    Get real willya bud.
    
    No where did I compare or say that Cheaney was the offensive equal of
    the Pistol.
        
    Lets refresh that baby blue memory.  You said that no way does a person
    make all-american unless they excel at all aspects of the game.  I
    called you on it, saying that isn't always the case - and that of all
    the aspects of the game, folks are most impressed with offensive
    numbers.  I then used Pistol Pets as an EXAMPLE (not a comparison to
    Cheaney) of a player that was an all-american, yet did not excel in all
    aspects of the game - thereby proving your assertion false.  And I'm
    sure Pistol Pete isn't the only all-american that was on the team based
    on pure offensive abilities.  
    
    So, once again you make a general statement, get called on it - and
    then try to squirm out of it by twisting the original note around.
    
    jd
15.493Will JD continue to Obfuscate?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 04 1991 16:4823
    Just what in the heck are you going on about, JD?  You're worried about
    the boat needing a new paint job when it's just struck an iceburg and
    is settling to the bottom of the Atlantic.
    
    Why not address (specifically and directly, if possible) the following:
    
    A. According to college hoops experts, Calbert Cheaney is one of the
       TEN (10) best players in the USA.
    
    B. Despite not even playing that badly, Fight (tm) sat him on his
       butt for almost the entire 2nd half against UCLA, therefore
       eliminating any possibility for Indiana to win.
    
    The *only* reasonable defense I've read from anybody is from Cap,
    who agrees with me that Knight's inexplicably benching was, indeed, 
    inexplicable, and that there must be forces at work that we don't know 
    about.  (i.e. missed class, injury, etc.)  If this proves to be the
    case I assure you I will offer complete and forthright apologies all
    the way around.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
15.494Spin, spin, spin..RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMacaulay Culkin makes me puke!Wed Dec 04 1991 16:5415
    I'm not obfuscating, oh Soupster.  You made a calim that you don't make
    all-american unless you can play good de, rebound, etc.  I called you
    on it.  You then tried to claim I compared Cheaney to Maravich - and I
    proved you wrong on that point.
    
    So now   you are in spin control at its finest.  You couldn't grasp
    that someone would play your game of calling folks on generalities -
    and you don't have a clue on how to answer (BTW - all you needed to say
    is you were wrong, and let it go...) so you are spinning and spinning
    and bringing up Bob's benching of Cheaney - which has nothing to do
    with your general claim about All-Americans or my rebuttal.
    
    The floor's waxed Soup - start spinning some more.
    
    JD
15.495Another example of an incomplete A-A ...SCNDRL::HUNTFenestracryptographer WannabeWed Dec 04 1991 17:2018
15.496ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Dec 04 1991 17:2421
    >Cap, who agrees with me that Knight's inexplicably benching, was,
    >indeed, inexplicable.
    
    Shameless.  Cap agreed to no such inexplication.  In fack, Cap
    *explained* the benching, and quite well thank you.
    
    You're least worst off by just leaving it as you originally framed it:
    
    1) That this was the first star benching ever
    2) That Calbert wasn't playing that badly
    3) That it all happened cuz Bob is insane.
    
    At least then, with the exception of 1) above, you're in the element
    you like best, that is, pure subjectivity.
    
    Btw, who are *you* to carp on so about substitutions?  Need I remind
    you of 93 substitutions in a certain Final Four upset loss and the role
    it played?  Where Bob's benching made perfect sense, this unnamed
    "coach's" 92 benchings were madness when the clutch was down.
    
    MrT
15.497GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Dec 04 1991 17:3813
    
    Chris, let me ask you an honest question.  What do you care if Knight
    did indeed sacrifice an opening game victory to drive home a lesson
    for later on?  Weren't you crediting Smith with some such genius last
    year over a decision on man-to-man versus zone in an early-season game?
    What's the difference?  (And don't bring up that humiliation nonsense,
    since we've already heard that Cheaney agreed with the benching,
    and it's widely recognized that such an action is effective in the
    personal development of young players in spite of that kiss-and-make-up
    psychobabble you and Wildcat have been throwing around...)
    
    glenn
    
15.498Machine Gun attack on BobDisciples RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 04 1991 17:4933
    > it's widely recognized that such an action is effective ...
    
    "Widely recognized", glenn?  There's not a coach in the USA who
    would've benched Cheaney for almost an entire half like Knight did
    based on his performance.  (Which wasn't that bad.)   None.  No one.
    Nada.  
    
    The fact that Cheaney "agreed with the benching" was a MrT quote, which
    means it's inheriently unreliable.  Even if he really did say this it 
    doesn't surprise me.  Knight's got him in_a sleeper hold, eligibility-wise.
    He either plays by Knights rules or effectively ends his collegiate
    career, since transferring at this point is a desperate option.  
    
    
    re: MorT
    
    Cap has *repeatedly* admonished me for not being fully aware of the
    facts surrounding the Cheaney benching.  Why else would he say this
    unless he himself drew the same conclusion I did.  Namely, that Bob
    had some other reason to intentionally not try to win a game, cause
    Calbert sure wasn't playing that poorly.
    
    
    re: JD
    
    I congratulate you JD for snookering me into_a whirlwind of
    obfuscation.  In the battle of trivial nonsense, you're the winner.
    Sadly (for you) though we must increment your "L" column in this
    Bob war, cause his bench coaching in the UCLA game was horrid and
    his handling of his best player inexcusable.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.499RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMacaulay Culkin makes me puke!Wed Dec 04 1991 17:5822
    Chris -
    
    Do you know every coach in the USA personally - and absolutely ,
    positively *know* as *fact* that not one other coach in the USA would
    have benched Cheaney?  Or is that your *opinion* that every other coach
    would have let poor ol Calvin play?  Remember, Chris - opinions aren't
    fact.  Seems that you are guilty of the same crimes you blam others
    for....
    
    In fact - this whole thang is based on your opinion, and your main main
    Dick Vitale.   That, my amigo, does not make it gospel.  And isn't it
    your opinion that Calvin wasn't playing badly, against others opinion
    that he wasn't playing all-around ball - and that opinion includes Bob
    Knight - he of 3 titles, a gold, and HOF credentials.   
    
    And nice double pump spin move admitting you were wrong - and then
    somehow tying that to the loss to UCLA.   Spin control that Ronny,
    georgie and Deanie would simply admire!
    
    Kudos.
    
    JD
15.500William Kennedy Smith could use a main like you, JD.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 04 1991 18:018
    You'd make a great lawyer, JD ...
    
    
    
    But a tewible basketball analyst.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.501Teaching Fundamentals 101DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Wed Dec 04 1991 18:0324
    Tsk, Tsk, Tsk gentlemen.  Let's see if I can say this so that everyone
    grasps it.  
    
    Ok, real slow now, ready?
    
    As stated previously (pause)... Bob Knight could've done a (pause)...
    
    much better job of (pause)... teaching if he had taught (pause)...
    
    young Calbert during the game (pause)... rather than waiting (pause)...
    
    several days later in practice.
    
    It really has nothing to do with the young Calbert's emotional health. 
    It's fact that he would've learned more however if Knight had used the
    game as a teaching opportunity.  Sit him for a few minutes, and then
    bring him back in the game to *LEARN*.
    
    That's the end of todays lesson.  Next week, will explain why they took
    the bottom out of the peach basket!
    
    Many :-)'s
    
    WILDCAT
15.502STRATA::CAPPELWed Dec 04 1991 18:0429
    
    Chris,
    
    If you going to speak on my behalf than please don't lie....
    
    Coaches bench star players all the time(it happens in HS, it happens
    in College, it happens Pro Sports, it happens in Rec league's, etc).
    This usually occurs due to a lack of effort or lack of performance
    either during the game or it is built up over the course of
    time(previous practices, games, etc).  The goal of a move like this
    is to show the player that if they are not going to play up to their
    capabilities and provide 100% effort than they are going to sit the
    bench.  IU was not going to win with Cheaney playing that poorly.
    He was playing extremely poorly on defense and was not moving at all
    without the ball(thus not getting any open shots).
    
    My premise is that Cheaney was playing poorly(which he was) and that
    you can't make the case that Knight sole mission was to humiliate
    Cheaney without knowing ANY OF THE FACTS that might have led up to
    this benching.   Being ignorant of the possibility of other issues
    involved in this situation, I just wanted to remind you to look at
    the whole picture.
    
    You can keep up with the Knight humiliating Cheaney charade if you
    want, it doesn't bother me any.  It just gives alot of people the
    opportunity to make you look bad.
    
    Cap
    
15.503STRATA::CAPPELWed Dec 04 1991 18:1015
    
    Wildcat that is a perfectly viable teaching alternative and perhaps
    Knight should have done it that way, but since we don't know what
    motivates Calbert(and we should presume Knight knows since he has 
    molded him into the player he is), than we really can't knock Knight's
    coaching techniques unless Calbert goes into the tank this year(and 
    judging by his last two performances, I'd say Knight's technique worked
    quite well).
    
    Chris, on the other hand, took this opportunity to try and paint this
    move as sinister and that it would affect Calbert's psyche, which
    is a completely inaccurate statement without knowledge of all the facts
    within this situation.
    
    Cap
15.504Congrats, Chris, for never answering my question!GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Dec 04 1991 18:131
    
15.505DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Wed Dec 04 1991 18:179
    Cap, you made a good point about us not knowing what motivates Calbert. 
    Perhaps he had gotten a swelled head from press clippings.
    
    Anyway... I'll get to see the boys in person this Saturday at the
    Hoosier Dome.
    
    GO CATS!
    
    WILDCAT
15.506ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Dec 04 1991 18:5612
    Rope, you're living in Kaintuck or Mecca?  Wish I could be there.
    It's on national TV.  The UK-IU hoops rivalry may be the most
    storied, longlived, and bitter in the game.
    
    Hey, if you're in Kaintuck watch out.  Word from Mecca is that
    the Indiana State Troopers are gonna be running a roadblock at
    the I-65 bridge over the Ohio checking for passports and green
    teef'.
    
    Good luck!
    
    Big10 Bigot Tom
15.507Talk about your humiliations ...SCNDRL::HUNTFenestracryptographer WannabeWed Dec 04 1991 18:5815
15.508STRATA::CAPPELWed Dec 04 1991 19:0410
    Wildcat,
    
    Have a blast, remember to wear red and white.... :-)
    
    Should be a very exciting game(I love watching games that involve
    Pitino because his teams are exciting to watch play).  It will be 
    interesting to see what Pitino devises to free up his 3-point shooters
    for easy shots(a problem they had the last time they played IU).
    
    Cap
15.509RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOMacaulay Culkin makes me puke!Wed Dec 04 1991 19:389
    Chris -
    
    So - you get called to the carpet a couple of times trying to pass off
    your biased opinions as facts - and all you can come up with is a
    faintly veiled insult thrown my way.    Nice going bub.  So - still
    wondering - how do you know that *every* other coach in the USA would
    not have benched Calvin?  
    
    JD
15.510ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Dec 05 1991 11:0024
    It seems that Rick knows he has a nuclear widebody mogambo stud in
    Mashburn and is gonna use him.  That could be a bigger threat to IU.
    Allegedly 6-8 no particularly strong, quick, coordinated, quick-jumping,
    good-shooting, good-ball-handling, or otherwise skilled Matt Nover will
    look to survive against Mash on D and to not turn the ball over more
    than five times on offense.  If Mash runs wild jamming and blocking
    shots and rebounding and passing that will put IU on their heels and 
    finally open up the trey too.
    
    However, if Nover survives the IU system could hold up nicely.  Also,
    if he flops - as he did many times last year against top centers, Bob
    might opt for the 3-guard lineup and take on the Mildcats with quickness.
    
    Note: Eric Anderson and Damon Bailey did not start against Notre Dame.
    My speculation is that Damon was sat for his poor outside shooting and
    inability to do anything on the floor against UCLA's quick guards. 
    Don't know why Anderson was sat.  Quick defensive-minded Chris Reynolds
    started for Damon and budding star Alan Henderson started for Anderson.
    
    Maybe he should start Anderson in the middle.  He'd get into fould
    trouble against MonsterMash but he'd be a heckuva lot better than the 
    awful Matt Nover...
    
    MrT
15.511DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Thu Dec 05 1991 11:549
    'T, I suspect that you'll see Anderson at his usual forward spot on
    offense, then on defense he will guard the Monster Mash.  UK still has
    major problems at the other two spots on the front line.
    
    Also, Tuesday, UK lost a major player.  Starting guard Jeff Brassow,
    the best player in the motion offense was lost for the season with a
    serious knee injury. :-(  Brassow's loss will be tough to overcome.
    
    WILDCAT
15.512CNTROL::CHILDSG.Bush, unconvicted criminalThu Dec 05 1991 13:059
 >   Also, Tuesday, UK lost a major player.  Starting guard Jeff Brassow,
 >   the best player in the motion offense was lost for the season with a
 >   serious knee injury. :-(  Brassow's loss will be tough to overcome.
    
   Richie Farmer stepped in and filled the void rather effectively last night
   I'd say. I like Farmer I think he brings a more well rounded game to the
   floor than Brassow. He is more of a liability defensively though...

  Mash warmed up with 28 last night T, think Matt's shaking??
15.513A larnin year fer IrishCTHQ2::LEARYBetter than LDSThu Dec 05 1991 13:269
    Thanks T,
    I needed to hear that IU started out wif one hand tied loosely
    behind the back whilst slappin' poor Irish 'round with big
    1st half lead THEN bringin' in studs to slap Irish 'round more
    in second half. 32 points, tis embarraskin. Man, and I cain't wait
    till this squad travels to Lexington. Whew.
    
    MikeL
    
15.514Sadam Hussan Debate Tactics 101ANGLIN::KIRKMANBack to shoveling snow again (Uugh)Thu Dec 05 1991 13:2921
1.  If winning - Declare glorious victory.  Remind your opponent of this 
debate repeatedly during every other debate.  Attempt to prolong the debate. 

2.  If evenup - Declare glorious victory.  Quietly move to the next debate.

3.  If losing - Stall.  Ignore your opponent's points.  Complicate the issue.
Reinvoke old won debates.  Change the subject.  At a later time, declare 
glorious victory.

How is this related to Big Ten Basketball you ask?


	Sounds like the recent Bob vs. Dean discussions


;-)  8-)

Scott

P.S. My tongue-in-cheek aggreement with John Hendry.  The discussion can be 
interesting, but can get old real fast.
15.515ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Dec 05 1991 14:1916
    re: MikeL
    
    This is the worst Irish team since Digger had to use football players
    way back when.  Awful, but they'll get better.   Bob ran his players
    cuz IU is in disarray as far as who's gonna step forward and run the
    system in several roles.
    
    re: Scott and John Hendry
    
    Let me be blunt.  Those of us involved in the Grate Debate don't give
    a damn what you think of the rathole.  If you don't like it, butt out.
    That's why we have N.U. keys.  Use 'em.  Quit clogging our hoops notes
    up with non-sports-related egotistical political diatribes about what
    great writers you are.
    
    MrT
15.516DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Thu Dec 05 1991 18:0531
    re .506
    
     >>   Rope, you're living in Kaintuck or Mecca?  Wish I could be there.
     >>   It's on national TV.  The UK-IU hoops rivalry may be the most
     >>   storied, longlived, and bitter in the game.
    
    'T, I've lived in both.  However, I'm currently located in Dayton, OH
    (YAWN) :-)  Certainly agree with you about the rivalry.  The games are
    always hotly contested.  It may be the most important game of the year
    for the fans of both programs.  As far as UK goes, the only other teams I
    like to  see them beat consistently is Louisville, and maybe LSU.  Any
    win over IU is sweet for UK and vice versa.
    
    re .508
    
        Wildcat,
    
        Have a blast, remember to wear red and white.... :-)
    
        Should be a very exciting game(I love watching games that involve
        Pitino because his teams are exciting to watch play).  It will be
        interesting to see what Pitino devises to free up his 3-point
    shooters
        for easy shots(a problem they had the last time they played IU).
    
        Cap
    
    Cap, blue and white and you've got a deal!  Should be a very intense
    ballgame.
    
     - WILDCAT
15.517Cheaney had 4 fouls, btwCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Dec 06 1991 00:4618
T,

	Anderson didn't get the start because of poor work habits in practice.
	According to Ellenberger, Eric was so fidgety sitting next to him on
	the bench that he could hardly concentrate on the game, and told him
	that Knight had gotten his attention.

	Bailey seems to still be feeling the effects of the foot injury over
	the summer, and the back(?) injury that forced him to sit out the
	game against the Soviets.  Even if he was healthy, Reynolds would
	be starting (Knight says he's their best guard), and Graham has 
	improved enough that Bailey might not be able to beat him out for
	the starting spot.

	Defending the 3s will be the key against the Mildcats, I expect.  
	When the 3s don't work, the rest of their offense seems to fall apart.

tom
15.518ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Dec 06 1991 10:337
    Any word on Lindemann's progress?  I see that Nover is still starting
    and getting the minutes, but that Lindemann's been doing backup time.
    
    But Alan Henderson... ahhhh.  Probably the best player at IU since
    Isiah.  We'll see.
    
    MrT
15.519STRATA::CAPPELFri Dec 06 1991 11:1820
    >  <<< Note 15.517 by CSOA1::SIMPSON_T "In search of mythical kings" >>>
    >                     -< Cheaney had 4 fouls, btw >-
    
    
    Well we finally have a good reason why Cheaney sat(outside of his
    horrible play), he sat in the 2nd half due to foul problems and the
    game was not within reach by the time Knight was ready to send him 
    back in.
    
    Knight probably felt that if they could have come within 10 by the 
    10 minute mark than Cheaney could be brought back in, however the
    spread was 20 or so points at that time, so why risk injury to your
    star player in a game that you are going to most likely lose anyway.
    
    Now let's see if ACChris is a man of his word(he says he always admits
    to mistakes and offers a public apology).  
    
    Get in here, Chris.....
    
    
15.520Oops ... I should say Simpson instead of Cap Yawn anyhowLUNER::BROOKSStardate 12.06.91 - BE THERE !Fri Dec 06 1991 15:496
    Cap, why did wait a full 2 weeks to offer this piece of obvious
    evidence ? 
    
    Asuming of course, that it really cain be considered evidence ...
    
    Doc
15.521Anybody got a tape of this game?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 06 1991 16:136
    Really, Doc.  Besides the fact that I don't think this is correct. 
    Maybe Bob *thought* he had four (4) fouls, but to the best of my
    recollection Cheaney didn't have 4.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.522That was my assumption, anyways ...CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RFri Dec 06 1991 16:276
>                         -< Cheaney had 4 fouls, btw >-

        Cap,

	Don't you think this refers to the Notre Dame game, since the
	rest of the note also refers to the IU-Irish game ?
15.523STRATA::CAPPELFri Dec 06 1991 16:3257
    Doc,
    
    For once, please, show me you can add something intellegent to one
    of these conversations.....
    
    ACChris, 
    
    Good person to align yourself with(Doc), really helps out your
    credibility..... :-)
    
    I think a public expression of your error is required here(at least
    if your BIG enough to admit when you are wrong).
    
    Here's what we have:
    
    o A noter enters in the fact that Cheaney had 4 fouls(which I believe
      is correct because Cheaney did start the 2nd half against UCLA),
      which would more than justify Calbert sitting.
    
    o Cheaney for his skills was having a terrible game, shooting poorly
      without the ball, not moving without the ball on offense, getting
      burned on defense and committing stupid turnovers.
    
    o We have a direct quote that Anderson sat against Notre Dame due to
      poor practice habits and work, something that could have justified
      Knight sitting Cheaney.
    
    You have accused Knight of intentionally trying to humiliate Cheaney
    on national TV, although you can produce absolutely no evidence of this
    happening.  Also there was no outcry about this in the national papers
    or the media.  We only had Dick Vitale say that Knight could not win
    without Cheaney, but he did not mention anything about humiliating
    Cheaney.
    
    Now it's amazing how cowardly you are in dealing with this situations
    and other questions that have been asked of you(the so-called objective
    analyst).  
    
    - You have failed to document any facts behind Knight's supposed 
      humiliation(don't say past behaviour because I also asked you
      to document any incident in the last 3 years that paints Knight in a 
      bad light).
    
    - You have failed to answer even the simplest questions concerning 
      the failures of your favorite program, falsely claiming that they
      have been answered in the past.
    
    - You fail to acknowledge an obvious mistake.  I'll be the first to 
      admit that Knight was wrong if he tried to humiliate Cheaney, but
      I don't think he did and you have offered not even one piece of
      evidence that supports your crazed accusations.
    
    Now either offer up evidence that Knight did this on purpose or show
    us your a man of your words and admit your error.
    
    Cap
     
15.524STRATA::CAPPELFri Dec 06 1991 16:4025
        >Cap,

	>Don't you think this refers to the Notre Dame game, since the
	>rest of the note also refers to the IU-Irish game ?

    Yes that might be the case but it since no reference was made to
    Cheaney in that note and since this note has been dedicated lately to his
    benching, I assumed that this was the case.
    
    If not I was wrong in my assumption and I'll admit it, it still doesn't
    stop the fact that Chris has offered up no evidence that Knight was
    purposely trying to humiliate Cheaney.  
    
    Having 4 fouls would just be one variable in what might have caused the
    extended benching, it might be simpler if I just ask the simple
    question:
    
    ACChris, Do you know any of what went on prior to or during the game
    that may or may not have justified Calbert's benching and do you have
    any evidence that Knight was purposedly attempting to humiliate
    Cheaney?
    
    Let's see if he has the backbone to answer that simple question.
    
    Cap
15.525As MrT sez, nothin' worse than a mistaken correction!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 06 1991 16:504
    Haw haw haw!!!!1111
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.526STRATA::CAPPELFri Dec 06 1991 17:0015
    
    I have not admitted that was a mistake, no question was asked about
    Cheaney concerning the ND game, he has only been mentioned in
    conjunction with the UCLA game so it is most likely that he was
    referring to the UCLA game.
    
    I had already thought of this premise before I entered in my note
    and if I was wrong in my assumption I will admit.
    
    Anyway if it thrills you to gloat over false victories so be it,
    I'm still waiting for you to grow a backbone and answer the questions
    put forth or can't you have an intellegent, objective basketball
    conversation?
    
    Cap
15.527Prediction: Indiana 76, Mildcats 69CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Dec 06 1991 17:1921
All,

	Sorry for any confusion.  I thought it would be obvious that I was
	referring to the UCLA game.

Chris,

	I *HAD* a tape of the game and verified this after coming back from a
	trip and reading the plethora of notes concerning poor humiliated
	Calbert.  Can't say that I have it now, though.  Not exactly a game
	I'd want to watch over, and over, and over.



	By the way, I in no way consider this evidence for anything, since
	I don't have any desire to take part in this "discussion".  It's
	simply a fact that hopefully will help people move on to better
	arguments.


tom
15.528Any public admission of error Chris?????STRATA::CAPPELFri Dec 06 1991 17:249
	>By the way, I in no way consider this evidence for anything, since
	>I don't have any desire to take part in this "discussion".  It's
	>simply a fact that hopefully will help people move on to better
	>arguments.
    
    I agree 100%, thanks for the inputs and the dagger that killed off
    this charade that was being played.
    
    Cap
15.529The documented evidence has been lost? Hmmm ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 06 1991 17:255
    Seems funny Tom that ESPN never picked up on this fact.  I never heard
    a single mention of Cheaney being in foul trouble.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.530STRATA::CAPPELFri Dec 06 1991 17:2910
    Tom,
    
    Any word on how Reynolds and Meeks played against Notre Dame.  I think 
    they are the key to breaking Kentucky's pressure.  Also has Greg
    Graham's ballhandling skills improved any?  It looks like he's improved
    an outside shot which probably would keep Bailey on the bench.
    
    Thanks,
    
    Cap
15.531ESPN and Vitale: unimpeachable sources...GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Dec 06 1991 17:4012
    
>    Seems funny Tom that ESPN never picked up on this fact.  I never heard
>    a single mention of Cheaney being in foul trouble.
     
    Well, Crisp, you know how accurate and thorough your buddy Dick
    Vitale can be when he gets on one of his tangents, what with the 
    likes of his assessment of the Big East as the superior conference in
    the country and of Eric Montross being the wrong player in the wrong 
    system...
    
    glenn
      
15.532The Truth and Objectivity are all I'm ever after.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 06 1991 17:5721
    Never said ESPN/Vitale are unimpeachable glenn, although I will say I
    find Dickie to be a breath of fresh air in terms of speaking openly and
    honestly.  (A rare breed on the tube, to say the least ...)
    
    What we have here is a factual discrepency that needs correction.  *IF*
    it turns out Cheaney was indeed in foul trouble and got yanked cause of
    that (and didn't reenter the game cause IU was already blown out) then:
    
    o I'm right about Cheaney not playing that badly.
    
    o MrT is dead wrong about Cheaney playing badly.
    
    o BobKnight made a poor coaching move to not get Calbert back in the
      game before it was too late.
    
    All things considered, I'd be more than happy to admit I erred in
    saying Fight (tm) was trying to humiliate Calbert.  (Again, assuming
    somebody can lay their hands on the game tape to verify the 4 fouls...)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.533ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Dec 06 1991 18:0532
    Haa.  Turns out that once again ACCrock was caught operating without
    a clue on what he was blabbing about and he got cold-busted.  And not
    only won't he admit his most egregious error, he's implying that the
    superobjective t_Simpson is a lie.  Sad.
    
    Hey, Crock-o'-Holic: You ever gonna answer Cap's fine questions?  Or
    are you skeert.  [no and yes]
    
    Now that we've managed to put this little imbroglio behind us, MrT
    wants to axe a_overarching question:
    
    	Do you think Bob will stick with the awful Matt Nover or 
    	will he throw in the towel and move over to starting a
        3-guard lineup?
    
    re: Minnesota
    
    Look for this squad to pull some upsets.  6-4 frosh Voshon Lenard is
    causing a stir with his play, 6-8 240 widebody Randy Carter is racking
    up boards and tossing in points from the paint, and 7-2 senior Bob
    Martin's listless play has ended with his diagnosis and treatment of
    a sever iron deficiency.  Townsend Orr is playing very well, and so are
    most of the frosh, my fave being 6-9 small forward Chad Kolander.
    
    Clem cain coach, and these guys are gonna roll.
    
    re: Michigan
    
    The numbers for the "best frosh class ever" over their first games
    have been mind-blowing.  17 rebounds by Chris Webber?  Whoa.
    
    MrT
15.534DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Fri Dec 06 1991 18:206
    'T, why would IU go to a three guard lineup?  I suspect you'll see
    Henderson starting and Anderson moving to center.  True, may not be the
    ideal slot for Anderson, but many teams including UK would kill to have
    a player of Eric's ability in the middle.
    
    WILDCAT
15.535ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Dec 06 1991 18:2619
    Dunno for sure, but I have a sneaking suspicion that Bob is committed
    to playing Eric at forward full-time, finally, to give him the best
    shot at the NBA.  Anderson's sacrificed a lot in terms of stats and
    physical punishment by playing in the middle.  Also, when up against
    bigger and/or quicker middlement Eric usually gets into early foul
    trouble.  He's just not a good center.  And when he goes to the bench
    late in the first half with 3 PFs it has a nasty effect on the team's
    overall play, especially at offensive end.  On the other hand, IU does
    have some depth at forward now with Alan, so maybe Bob'll do it.
    
    I agree, I'd prefer to see Anderson at center.  If not that, then 
    play Lindemann full-time and suffer through the learning curve.
    
    But if anything thus far it looks like Anderson/Henderson/Cheany 
    splitting time at the two F slots and Nover/Lindemann in the post.
    
    Yucky.
    
    MrT
15.536No title for this replyCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Dec 06 1991 18:2716
Chris,

	ESPN reported it as Cheaney's fourth when the foul occurred, but
	as far as I could tell Vitale and the other guy never mentioned
	it during the rest of the game.

Cap,

	Reynolds is playing very well, although the shooting is still a real
	problem.  The coaching staff thinks Meeks is playing a lot better
	just trying to keep up with him.  

	Graham's made a lot of improvements, but so far this year they're
	still keeping the ball out of his hands as much as possible.

tom
15.537IU should handle the Cats easily, IMO.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 06 1991 18:2810
    I can understand why you'd wanna drop the whole thing MorT, seeings how
    you thought he got benched cause of horrendous play!  Haw!!
    
    Since ESPN never reported on the four (4) fouls I made the logical
    assumption that Bob was in the midst of one of his notorious
    and well-documented humiliation campaigns.  Instead it just turns out
    that he did a lousy coaching job.  Oh well ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.538ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Dec 06 1991 18:3813
    We don't want to drop anything.  It just turns out that you made a 
    horrible mistake and in light a your repeated claims to "objective
    analyst" status we expect you to admit your mistake and maybe even
    apologize for the way you handled things.
    
    Btw, in keeping with things turning out the way MrT had predicted
    them UCLA is now the 2nd ranked team in the country.  And rightfully
    so, they're probably the most talented team out there.  And they have
    the best shot at nabbing the Title from the nation's best team, the
    Duke Blue Devils led by pretty boy Teutonic dream boat Christian Laettner 
    and that ugly little Irish point guard.
    
    MrT
15.539DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Fri Dec 06 1991 18:4614
    The thing that worries me about tomorrows game is the play of John
    Pelphrey.  He just hasn't looked good at all the last two games.  I
    believe UK can win tomorrow if they shoot well (at least 50%).  One big
    problem in my mind could be Alan Henderson.  If you assume that Mash
    has to take Anderson, who takes Henderson?  One of the Frosh
    (Timberlake or Rhodes)?  That along with how well they do defensively
    on Cheney may determine the outcome of the game.
    
    My buddy and I will leave Dayton farily early tomorrow morning so that
    we are in Indy for any pre-game festivities, etc.  The Hoosier dome
    will be electric tomorrow.  IU-UK is truly an exciting contest no
    matter how each team is doing.  I'll give a report Monday morning.
    
    WILDCAT
15.540Who's televising IU vs. Kaintuck tomorrow?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Dec 06 1991 18:5115
    > horrible mistake
    
    Speaking of horrible mistakes, what about *yours*, insisting that
    Calbert was having a **TERRIBLE** game and therefore wholly deserved
    a 2nd half benching.  
    
    
    > horrible mistake
    
    Speaking of horrible mistakes, what about *Bob's*, who left Calbert
    on the bench just long enough for IU to never have a chance to win
    the game.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.541DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Fri Dec 06 1991 19:024
    Chris, I believe CBS will be televising the game at 3:45.  Can't figure
    the wierd start time.
    
    WILDCAT
15.542A little too early.....POCUS::SALTALAMACCHSat Dec 07 1991 10:456
    Re: a few back...
    
    Rhodes...Isn't he a senior in HS who has committed to KU?
    
    Redmen Phil
    
15.543ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightSun Dec 08 1991 15:3616
    >horrible mistake
    
    >>... what about yours?
    
    Whaddya blabbing about now Crockmeister.  Calbert was having a awful
    game, had four fouls, was deservedly benched, and by the time to come
    back the game was a out a reach blowout so why risk injuring Calbert 
    when you could give some gbage time to young Henderson?
    
    Y mouthed off about Bob being a insane maniac and didn't even know
    he was burdened with 4 fouls.
    
    Shame on you for your abject inability to admit the error a your ways
    and to apologize.
    
    MrT
15.544AP/UPI/CNN polls to Bob: "Bye bye!" [Haw haw!!11]RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Dec 09 1991 13:148
    Dick Vitale's pre-season #1-ranked Indiana Hoosiers dropped their 2nd
    game of the year this Saturday, losing a virtual home game to the hated
    Kentucky Wildcats by a deuce.
    
    Just thought y'all would want to know.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.545Indiana is a poor-shooting finesse teamANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Dec 09 1991 13:1523
    The Kaintuck game was a good one, but, sadly, it was total and bitter
    vindication for poor MrT:
    
    Billy Packer: "It should be obvious to any IU fan what the two major
    		   weaknesses of the Hoosier team are."  
    
    Billy Packer: "Indiana doesn't have a center."
    
    Bob:	  "We really don't have an inside game to speak of, so we
    		   worked on defense to keep the ball from Mashburn if
    		   possible while jumping out on the three point shooters,
    		   and looked to get the ball to Cheany for good shots from
    		   the wing."
    
    Billy Packer: "Indiana needs somebody to step up and hit the perimeter
    		   shots.  They're getting good shots from outside, but
    		   don't seem to have a guy who can hit them except for 
    		   Cheany.  They're not a good outside shooting team at all."
    
    Billy Packer: "Mashburn is dominating inside.  What's going to happen to
 		   Indiana this year against teams with big people inside?"
    
    Big10 Tom:	  "Told you so."
15.546ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Dec 09 1991 13:3037
    Bob may have answered my question about what type of lineup he'll
    go with to mask the Hoosiers' obvious talent shortfalls.  He started
    forward Eric Anderson at center and 6-2 guard Damon Bailey at forward,
    thus opening up the 2nd guard spot for Chris Reynolds.  This left them
    running: 
    
    	     F -  6-6
    	     F -  6-2
	     C -  6-8
    	     G -  6-1
    	     G -  6-4
    
    This worked well against Pitino's trapping press, but Bob was forced 
    to bring in Matt Nover when Mash starting tearing the place up, twice
    actually getting the eye-popping mismatch against 6-0 Jamaal Meeks on
    the post and turning 3-point plays on both.  Pitino initally started 
    out working the outside game but soon recognized that Mash could have
    his way against the small front-line IU was using, especially where
    switches were forced... so he started running a motion offense on the
    baseline to force switches and it worked like a charm.  
    
    Pitino from the outset challenged IU's guards to shoot, which also was
    smart.  
    
    I steal take some comfort in the fack that IU was able to go down to
    the wire against a fine team like Kaintuck with a Monster like Mash.
    
    But if the Hoosiers aren't going to come up with a viable center in 
    Lindemann (and he must be pretty bad if he's unable to beat out Nover,
    who when recruited was viewed as a 3rd string foward type) then they
    MUST come up with somebody who cain shoot from the outside besides 
    Calbert.
    
    Also, it's looking more and more like Damon's threatened with a 2nd
    string role behind Reynolds and GGraham, who are far superior athletes.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.547DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Mon Dec 09 1991 13:439
    MrT:
    
    While watching the game, I noticed that on several occasions Anderson
    and Cheney made shots about a foot inside the three point line.  Pitino
    jumps down the players throats if they take a shot inside the line. 
    His philosophy is if you're that close, take a step back, and get the
    three.  Both Anderson and Cheney can hit the shot.  Why not take it?
    
    WILDCAT
15.548Honest question to_a Honest discrepencyRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Dec 09 1991 13:5810
    Ah, apologetics any philosopher would be proud of.  Only thing I
    haven't heard explained though is how a team that finished in the top 5
    in the USA last year and didn't lose anybody but did add one of the
    finest frosh in the land cain suddenly have so many horrible weaknesses
    that would put a 'W' over a CYO team appear uncertain.
    
    Could you explain this for me, MrT?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.549STRATA::CAPPELMon Dec 09 1991 14:038
    Chris,
    
    How can you ask any questions of anyone, when you so cowardly take
    the back door(by giving excuses, refusing to answer, etc) when any 
    objective question is put forth for you to answer.
    
    Simply Amazing....
    
15.550STRATA::CAPPELMon Dec 09 1991 14:1741
    Wildcat,
    
    I don't know why IU is not shooting the three this year(as it's always
    been a part of IU's offense).  One thing that might be happening, is
    that Bob likes to use the schedule prior to the Big10 season to work
    the kinks out of the offense and defense.  Anyway, failure to step out
    the extra foot for the trey probably cost them the game.  I wouldn't
    want Anderson consistently trying threes but Cheaney should be shooting
    them.
    
    Kentucky had a great defensive scheme on Reynolds and Meeks(by backing
    off them).  Knight should have had them shooting those shots in the
    2nd half just to see if they could make them and force Kentucky to
    guard them.
    
    Thoughts from the game:
    
    o Two good comebacks by IU, showed they do have the ability to stop
      the other team defensively when needed.
    
    o IU's interior defense is terrible, Mashburn was able to establish 
      position with ease.  I don't see an answer here unless Lindeman can
      play.  I think IU will play more zone this year than ever....
    
    o Outside shooting is a problem, hopefully Pat Graham can come back
      from his foot injury.
    
    o Good move by the coaches to keep the freshman out of this game.  From
      a defensive standpoint, it was a fascinating game to watch(as IU and
      Kentucky play the best man-to-man help defenses in the country).
    
    o I was happy with Greg Graham's aggressiveness in taking the ball to
      the hoop, but he should not be putting up shots outside of 15 feet.
    
    o Damon Bailey looks like he lost some quickness(he wasn't that fast
      to begin with), does anyone know if he's still having problems with
      his feet.
    
    o Pitino coached a very strong game, Knight coached well but should
      have had Reynolds and Meeks shooting more.
    
15.551ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Dec 09 1991 14:3770
    Rope, it depends on the flow leading up to the shot.  In Kaintuck's
    case they were running and then quick-reversing the ball to the weak
    side for the trey.  This leaves the Kaintuck with sufficient time to
    step back if necessary.  It's harder if you're a_inside main who's
    coming across the lane through traffic with a nearby defender,
    sometimes more than one.
    
    >Could you exlain this for me, MrT?
    
    Sure!
    
    First, anybody who believes that IU was among the five best teams going
    into last year's tourney is crazy.  They had the same holes then and it
    showed against Coastal Carolina, the FSU rioters, and Kansas.
    
    Second, Alan Henderson is in his fourth game.  He needs to be developed.
    He's not at full power yet in terms of net benefit to the team.  Ergo,
    your question is rather stupid.  You should defer until the tourney
    (assuming Indiana makes the tourney, and I think they will) until calling
    Bob's account due on the added dimension Henderson gives, which is the
    inside defensive and rebounding presence and shooting they so clealry
    lacked last year. 
    
    Third, Pat Graham is down with a broken foot.  He's the only guard on
    the team with the potential to develop into a fine outside shooter. 
    He's not too phsycial and is very slow of foot but he has a fine stroke.
    Pat also served as a third forward last year even though he's really
    a guard, and gave them a_offensive option when they collapsed over onto
    Cheaney and/or Eric.  I.e., Pat Graham is not playing yet this year,
    and may indeed sit out the entire year.
    
    Fourth, as Billy Packer repeatedly stated, Bob will make marginal
    sacrifices in preconference games to benefit preparation for the Big10
    schedule.  He did this Saturday by not playing Henderson for more
    minutes.  He's going to phase him in.  Beyond that, Bob's teams have
    historically shown steady improvement as the season progresses.  So,
    again, your comparison of an end-of-season Bob squad with a beginning-
    of-season Bob squad is a useless mistake.
    
    I cain see why you'd tend to make such a useless mistake, though, given
    that Snuffer's squads typically play at about the same level over an
    entire season.
    
    >apologetics any philospher would be proud of.
    
    Kaintuck won fair and square.  Pitino saw and exploited what Billy
    Packer pointed out were IU's two "obvious weakenesses."  These weaknesses
    in talent turned out to be exactly the same as those pointed out by me.
    IU is on track with my preseason prediction, having dropped in the rankings.
    
    So it's not apologetics but instead objective analysis of acknowledged
    facts.  Starting a 6-2 forward is not something Bob would do if he could
    avoid it, but he and everybody else in the Western Hemisphere realizes
    how severely limited Matt Nover is.
    
    IU will rack up a few cupcake victories with their annual munch-o'-thon
    Indiana Classic.  This tuning time will improve the team.  Then, they'll
    go into the Big10 and continue sustaining losses to the widebody teams
    like OSU, Iowa, State, Michigan, and Minnesota and sink into the low
    teens in the rankings, or maybe even into the 20s.
    
    But they'll improve.  Especially if they cain get PGraham back and/or 
    roll out Todd Lindemann as a serviceable center. 
    
    If they get on a roll they have a decent shot at making the Sweet Sixteen
    before sustaining a most Excellent Loss - and MrT looks forward to that
    and the pride it will bring me.
    
    MrT
    
15.552First the SEC then the BE .......CST17::FARLEYMcDroodburgers - toss em up or down!Mon Dec 09 1991 15:1322
    
    Attention all you IU Hooser fan(s):
    
    Right now, take out your pencils and mark down "another excellent
    loss" nexted to Bobby's name.  Date it 12/21.  Know why?????
    
    
    
    
    
    		still curious?
    
    
    
    
    'cause LOUIEEEEE!!!!! and the SJU Redmen are gonna make sure ta exploit
    ALL the deficiencies IU has!!!!!!!
    
    
    so there!
    Kev
    
15.553UofMOLDTMR::RACZKACant cheat with notes, gotta sing emTue Dec 10 1991 11:545
    
    Hey...Those Wolverines are now 3-0 on the year
    after last nights  112-62 win over Chicago St
    
    chris UCLA '82
15.554Deja vu all over againCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Dec 11 1991 00:2329
	The IU-Kentucky game looked a lot like last year's.  No outside 
	shooting, no ability to post up, and no chance at playing interior 
	defense without massive help from the guards.  Kentucky finally
	hit their 3s (some of them amazing), which you knew they'd do
	sooner or later, and Indiana didn't counter with much of anything.

	They looked much better against Vandy tonight, of course; harder
	play on both ends of the floor, and they kept it up for most of
	the game.  But Vandy's no Kentucky ---  no one like Mashburn on the 
	inside to dominate, and a much less effective outside game.  This 
	gave the Indiana guards time to recover without getting burned after 
	going inside to help out.  At some point they need to go out and
	beat a top quality team.  It's been a long time since we've seen
	them do that.

	I was surprised Cheaney and Anderson didn't play more the second
	half, although that may have had something to do with the score.
	Wasn't too surprised that they (along with Bailey) were out the
	entire first half, though.  When Knight makes this big a change
	it normally lasts more than a few minutes.

	Holiday tournament this weekend for the Hoosiers.  Should be two
	easy W's, and maybe the start of the kind of improvement they'll
	need if they want to be competitive with the really good teams
	in the country (or the conference, for that matter).  

	They've got a long way to go.

tom
15.555ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Dec 11 1991 11:2447
    The Vandy team was a good sounding board for a team like IU, a 
    team looking for people to step up and fill holes, a team looking
    to improve enough to ove up to the next level.  This is cuz Vandy,
    under Smif' acolyte Eddy Fogler, has done some recruiting that gained
    national recognition the last year.  LeRoy Woods, Milholland, and 
    Milburn are all big guys (LeRoy wears  1/2 size shoe) with good
    bodies and some talent.  True, they're almost all frosh and like IU
    have no outside shooters to speak of, but they're a decent barometer
    for a team looking for a front-line:
    
    * Alan Henderson is Indiana's most talented player.He blocked shots
      and hit the O-boards and generally outplayed the Vandy's big, highly
      recruited freshmen.
    
    * Todd Lindeman did OK too.  Again, as with Henderson, these weren't
      UCLA's widebodies they were playing, but he shot over some people 
      and grabbed the D-boards he should've, which oftentimes Nover is
      unable to do.
                                                                  
    * They played with the best defensive intensity I've seen in at least
      two years.  True, again, it was against aoung and raw squa but
      that kindplay will make up for their talent gaps in most games 
      during the Big10.
    
    * On the negative side, Indiana attempted 13 treys, most in the first
      quarter of the game... and missed most of them.  
    
    As the announcers repeated said, Bob is obviously looking hard for some
    inside players on D and the bs, and some outside shooting.  He's 
    found half his inside game in Alan, and may be forced to move Anderson
    into the middle (where he played when he was oncourt last night) or
    maybe even Calbert to 
    
    GGraham is their most consistent player.  He started at F last night,
    which at a long-armed 6-4 makes more sense than Damon cuz he's quicker
    and a quicker jumper for boards and on D.
    
    This team will get better.  I'd rank them at about 20th in the nation
    right now.  If Lindeman emerges and Alan continues to develop and
    somebody finds 3-point range, they might even be dangerous.
    
    But at this juncture I'm wondering if I shoulda predicted Indiana
    finsihing behind Michigan for 4th in the conference.  Michigan looks 
    very skeery right now.  Rebounds.  Ooodles a boards.And they're on
    the tube Thursday night.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.556ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Dec 11 1991 15:4645
    Anybody notice the sign being held up by a student in a couple of
    the crowd shots last night?
    
    		"Dear Santa, Please Send a Big Man!"
    
    Haa.  Apparently just another sandbagger.  
    
    It'll be interesting to see what this Lindeman kid cain do against
    the big men in the Big10: Webber, Peplowski, Martin, Moses, et al.
    If he cain hold his own on the D, the D-boards, draw a few fouls and
    chuck in a FG or two that would make a world of difference as far as
    the Hoosiers' chances go.
    
    It's tough to sort out where the roles and PT thing is going based on
    last night, what with the big shakeup (Calbert, Eric, and the alleged
    superstar talent Damon didn't start or play in the 1st half last night)
    and the blowout against Vandy and the resultant garbage time.  
    
    But it could be that 6-3 G Todd Leary will get a shot given his outside
    shooting ability.  He's beefed up some, but in order to stay on the
    floor he's gonna have to play some D, something he's been unable to do
    against top drawer competition to date.  The more time Leary gets the
    less likely it is that PGraham is gonna come back this year.  His foot
    is still in a cast.
    
    The Hoosier (Cupcake-Munch-o'-Thon) Classic is this weekend and usually
    gives a good view as to who's gonna be first off the bench during the
    Big10 season.  It sez here that Leary will get PT and a shot.
    
    I noticed in the 2nd half that Eric was playing C with Calbert and Alan
    on the wings.  Probably their best front-line talent.  If Bob stays
    with Nover and then Lindeman in the post something's got to give what
    with Henderson's fine play.  Somebody'll have to play backup F, possibly 
    Anderson.  No way cain either Anderson or Cheaney stay with Henderson
    when it comes to block and/or changed shots and O-rebounds - something
    the undersized Hoosiers sorely need.
    
    Also a potential sub this year is Damon.  Meeks/Reynolds/GGraham are
    much quicker and play better D than the slow-footed Bailey.  Also,
    Meeks and Reynolds seem a little better and dishing.  So, to stay in
    a starter's role Damon's gonna need to light it up from outside,
    something he's only been able to do sporadically to date (like the
    national TV game against Ohio State last year).
    
    MrT
15.557VCR camping -- IU reviewCELTIK::R_QUINNWed Dec 11 1991 19:5012
    I am impressed with Henderson.  He is one of those Freshmen that you
    have to let play though.  He has the killer instinct on both ends.  I
    wouldn't say he is the most talented IU player but He's got the best
    instincts for what Bob likes, hard play, in your jock D, and boards,
    boards, boards.  Lindeman looks a little like a guy by the name of Ted
    Kitchel who used to play at IU 8-10 years ago.  He looked about the
    same as a freshman(early).  He had a decent future until a knee injury
    I believe.
    
    I bowl on thursday night but I have the vcr camped out for the UM game.
    
    Roy L.
15.558ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Dec 12 1991 00:0732
    The Wolverines' game against E. Michigan will be sorta like the
    IU game against Vandy: A test against representative but inferior
    talent.  Dunno much about EMU except that they usually have about
    3 hot players and a bunch of stiffs.  With Vandy we saw a team that
    was extremely young but had some blue chip talent and will threaten
    for the SEC, maybe, in 2-3 years.
    
    Lindeman's unlike Kitchel in that Kitch was your 6-8 banger widebody
    forward type.  Kitch got very ugly about giving up boards.  I see
    Lindeman as more the gangly slowcenter type, but one with
    hope if he cain get his feet to talk to his haid on a fast enough
    response frequency.  tually, I believe it was a debilitating lower
    back injury that kiboshed Kitch's NBA career prcts, n his knee.
    
    The announcers were pretty smart durinthe Vandy-IU game, pointing 
    out that Eric really needs to play facinghe basket, i.e., he needs
    to play fwd and not C.  But if Lindeman's not capable, who is?  Looks
    like Eric oNover to me, and if it's Nover IU's going nowhere in the
    Big10 or the tourney.
    
    Cain't wait to see Webber.  He's quite the quipmeister in the press.
    Wanna see Jalen too.  These guys could be a frosh wrecking crew.  But
    they haven't played anybody yet.  EMU will be a tougher challenge.  
    Will find out just how far offhey are on Saturday against Duke.
    
    But, as Chris said, "Duke is the so-called #1 team in the country so
    we'll have to improve.  But sometimes teams play down to the level of
    their competition, so we'll see."
    
    Haa.  Gottaove it!
    
    Big10 Tom
15.559Did Marcus Kennedy (E Michigan) make the pros?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Dec 12 1991 11:2619
    re: .-1
    
    Somebody get the MrT decoder ring out - he's usin' his Hayes
    DumbModem again  ...
    
    E Michigan made the Sweet 16 last year before getting beaten soundly by
    North Carolina.  That's the good news.  The bad news is my S&S sez they
    lost their top 7 players!  In other words, look for Michigan to win
    *big*.
    
    Michigan - Duke could be close, but I doubt it.  Make no mistake,
    The Devils are no UNLV.  They can be beaten without a minor miracle
    taking place.  But with so many youngsters playing against such a
    seasoned team such as Duke, wail, I can't see this one being a game.
    Should be interesting to watch though, just to see UM's awesome talent
    arsenal.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.560OLDTMR::RACZKACant cheat with notes, gotta sing emThu Dec 12 1991 11:3810
    RE: -1
    
    DUKE   at   MICHIGAN
    
    This has all the makings to be a really great game
    
    But I think Webber, Howard and Rose will be too much 
    and that the wolverines will win
    
    chris UCLA alumni, who is waiting for the DUKE at UCLA game!!
15.561ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYRedSox,Broncos,MoiraLasch,DeanMon Dec 16 1991 12:3520
    Well, it seems my speculation on the Hoosiers starting lineup was
    on the right track: Against Cent. Mich. U. Henderson took Anderson's
    fwd spot, and Reynolds moved out the badly overrated Damon.  This
    left Nover in the middle.
    
    Michigan clearly has a shot at the Big10 Title this year.  I don't
    think they'll win it over OSU, but this is the best group a freshman
    I've seen since Wooden's heyday.  Chris Webber played Laettner to a
    standstill (and he's in his, what, 5th game as a collegian?), but the
    one who impresses me is this Rose.  
    
    You know there's trouble when Billy Packer starts yelling every time 
    a 6-2 junior guard touches the ball about how it must go to Jalen to
    protect it cuz he's so much better the ball handler... and Rose is 6-8.
    
    I don't think the Fab Five have had anybody come close to them on the
    boards yet, with Duke coming the closest thus far having only been out
    boarded by several.  The block shot situation had to be about the same.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.562Wow!SHALOT::HUNTMusicians For Free-Range ChickensMon Dec 16 1991 13:186
 Michigan's Fab Five look downright scary.   That's a very tough Duke team
 they took down to the wire.
 
 I'll be very surprised if Chris Webber stays all four years in Ann Arbor.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.563anybody notice that Juwan looks like he's 28?ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYRedSox,Broncos,MoiraLasch,DeanMon Dec 16 1991 14:241
    
15.564REFINE::ASHEWhaddya want for nothin'?Mon Dec 16 1991 14:342
    Which one was Jimmy (ex-Piston, not JJ) Walker's son?
    
15.565ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: SPORTS' Objective AnalystMon Dec 16 1991 14:5227
    Anybody heard what the story is with Lawrence Funderburke?  The media
    seemed pretty clear that he was fully eligible this year and I ain't
    seed his name in any a the Buckeyes' box scores.
    
    re 1
    
    Here are the Fab Five:                            
    
    Chris Webber C  6-10 (and growing) and I'd say about 240 lbs, quick,
    		    smart, aggresive and highly skeeled
    
    Juwan Howard F  6-10 and about 230, very strong, fairly quick, seems
       		    like he'll be the most mistake prone and might have
     		    a_attitude problem (he's always contorting his face
    		    about some call or other)
    
    Jalen Rose   G  Just your nice basic run a the mill 6-8 ballhandling
     		    PG who penetrates and bounds and plays D with verve,
    		    seems very polished
    
    Jimmy King   G  I'd guess about 6-4, an amazing jumping jack very quick
    		    off his feet and dangerous with the trey
    
        ?	    I thought the fifth Fab Five member - who I ain't seen
    		    play - was a guard whose surname was Jackson.  Dunno.
    
    MrT
15.566Execellent Game to watchCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Dec 16 1991 15:3823
    
    re -.1  Last of the Fab 5 is Ray Jackson out of Texas as is King.  He is
    also a leaper with good ball handling skills.  Against Eastern he
    looked to have the best penetration skills of the group but he got very
    few minutes against Duke.  Talking to one of my buddies back home he
    said the UM coach referenced a few questionable calls down the
    stretch.  Of course all of the calls went Dukes way.  He seemed to
    think a little bit of the NBA thing happened where rookies don't get
    any calls.  He then stated overall the refs. did a good job.  After
    looking at the game again this morning I sort of agree.  Billy Packer
    makes several references to phantom fouls or bad calls.  At this point
    in the season I don't think calls are a big issue because UM is really
    still gauging its talent and team play.  I think the team proved it's 
    ready for the big time errors and all.
    
    The "D" was much better than anticipated but Duke doesn't have any
    bangers.  Cherokee Parks withstanding because I haven't seen him play. 
    As for the being the top ranked recruiting class it may or may not be
    true but they have a clear advantage in that the have been getting
    immediate playing time.  Unlike Dean's and Bobby's kids.
    
    Roy L.
    "Goooooooooooo Blue"  
15.567Webber Power ForwardCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Dec 16 1991 15:414
    
    re. -2
    
    Webber is playing forward, Howard and Riley are playing center.
15.568ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: SPORTS' Objective AnalystMon Dec 16 1991 15:4826
    >they have been getting immediate playing time.  Unlike Dean's and
    >Bobby's kids.
    
    Now wait a minute.  Calbert started from game one.  So did Damon.
    So did Eric.  Also, the situation with Michigan this year is one that
    the team was wide open for new players, which no doubt greatly helped
    Fisher in recruiting such a class.  Eric Riley is a physically talented
    (very big, fairly quick, fine blocker, not real skeeled otherwise)
    player.  Voskuil is a good role player type.  Ditto for the guard (name
    escapes me right now).
    
    Bob has always believed in playing the best players regardless of age,
    race, or raw talent.  To wit: Benching the much-hyped Damon in favor of
    Chris Reynolds.  Bob has a long history of starting freshmen who cain
    do the job.  Alan Henderson's this year's example.  Lindeman will be
    soon if he measures up.  I don't buy your point.
    
    Also, many Big10 people are counting on Steve Fisher's wretched and
    undisciplined coaching to come through when the clutch goes down come
    Big10 time.  The Wolves have the talent to take the Title from Ohio
    State for sure, and regardless of experience.  If you're blocking and
    intimidating shots and dominating the board the coach is in the
    position to work on shot selection, matchups, and defenseive strategy
    to take a young team like this to a Big10 Title.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.569...qualified statementCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Dec 16 1991 17:2517
    
    RE: -1
    
    I should have qualified the statement:
    
    >they have been getting immediate playing time.  Unlike Dean's and
    >Bobby's kids.
    
    I tend to agree with your reasoning as it refers to Bob Knignt that he
    will play as his talent level dictates but seldom are there enough open
    spaces in his lineup for a full class of Frosh to play.  Dean has AA
    after AA(all america) on his squads so again even great Frosh get
    limited minutes.,  Reynolds would indeed be redshirted if not for
    injuries if I recall correctly.  Talley is the junior starting guard
    decent O and ball handling.
    
    Roy L.
15.570ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: SPORTS' Objective AnalystMon Dec 16 1991 18:0415
    Talley, that's it.  I thought he was the Wolves' best player last
    year.  But you know what I mean: The Wolves' roster was wide open
    this year.  
    
    It's unclear why Reynolds was brought back.  It's unlikely that he
    was brought back to replace PGraham (their only good shooting guard)
    cuz Reynolds is the worst shooter on the team (besides the awful Matt
    Nover the tiny center who is strongly discouraged from touching the
    ball under any circumstance besides rebounding).  It's more likely
    that he was brought back to give some D where Damon Bailey couldn't.
    
    And believe me, if Bob were able to recruit one a the good centers he
    went after he'd be starting frosh right now.
    
    MrT
15.571STRATA::CAPPELMon Dec 23 1991 10:1513
    Two recent quotes....
    
    Calbert Cheaney: "I deserved to sit and should have been benched.  I
    was playing terribly.  I need to find a way to stay focused all the 
    time.  Coach Knight helped me regain my focus."
    
    Dick Vitale: "Bobby, doesn't it hurt your recruiting when you bench
    your star players?"
    
    Knight: "Well I go by one simple rule, you play hard in practice, you
    play in games, you don't than you sit.  I would think that recruits
    would want to come into a program where everyone is treated fairly 
    and have the same chance to play."
15.572Bingo! BINGO !!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYLive human male exotic dancerMon Dec 23 1991 12:451
    
15.573Knight--c'mon talent doesn't matter at allCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Dec 23 1991 15:1712
    RE -2
    
    That direct comment doesn't reference talent but a player with light
    weight skills could practice his "donkey" off and would still probably
    get very little playing time.  I am making reference to the five guys
    on the end of the pine that tend to be practice quad only.
    
    Does College basketball offer 12 or 15 scholarships for hoops??  Also,
    when a player has a career ending injury does he still receive his
    scholarship and that count against the ncaa limit.
    
    Roy L.
15.574CSC32::J_HERNANDEZHippos-HippiesWithLowerVoicesMon Dec 23 1991 16:254
    
    Didn't the highest reanked big ten team get beaten by an unranked
    pac-10 team recently in college hoops. Wasn't their initials OHIO
    STATE?
15.575CTHQ1::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeMon Dec 23 1991 17:107
    Yep,
    USC pulled the upset and is now in the Top 25 for the first time under
    Raveling.  Is USC projected in the top 3 in BBall for the Pac 10 this
    year?
    
    MikeL
    
15.576final preconference Big10 pix anyone?ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Jan 06 1992 18:411
    
15.577DYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Mon Jan 06 1992 18:4814
    I'll take a stab at the first few.
    
    1. Indiana - Very impressive win over a talented UC squad Saturday.
                 Henderson's developing nicely.
    
    2. Ohio State - I'm not sure they have the "TOUGHNESS" to take the
                    title.  They'll give IU a run for their money though.
    
    3. Michigan - Maybe sheer talent will pull them into the upper echelons
                  of the Big 10.
    
    4. Michigan State - Playing very well.  Could surprise the favorites.
    
    WILDCAT
15.578REFINE::ASHEWhat's this about Creme de Menthe?Mon Jan 06 1992 20:2510
    Michigan
    Indiana
    MSU
    OSU
    Illinois
    Iowa
    who cares...
    
    
    
15.579Cast in StoneRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 07 1992 11:2213
    1. Indiana
    2. OSU
    3. MSU
    4. Michigan
    5. Iowa
    6. Minnesota
    7. Illinois
    8. Purdue
    9. Wisconsin
    10.Northwestern
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.580Sportswriter's Big10 PixANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 07 1992 13:5825
    Here are the pix from Dennis Brackin, Mpls. Star-Tribune college
    hoops beat writer:
    
    1.	Ohio State	Jim Jackson is the Big10's best; can Lawrence
    			Funderburke find happiness?
    
    2.  Michigan St.	The best chemistry and a great shooter in Shawn
    			Respert.
    
    3.  Indiana		Bob Knight needs perimeter shooting and more muscle
    			inside.
    
    4.  Michigan	The league's best talent, but they're only freshmen.
    
    5.  Iowa		Everybody's back from last season's NCAA team.
    
    6.  Purdue		No one gets more out of his talent than Gene Keady.
    
    7.  Minnesota	Randy Carter's aching feet will tell the story.
    
    8.  Wisconsin	Badgers finally have a point guard in Tracy Webster.
    
    9.  Illinois	Fate sealed with Andy Kauffman's academic woes.
    
    10. Northwestern	Much improved, but still the Mildcats.
15.581Duke's Grant Hill Speaks Out on Big10 Pix !!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 07 1992 14:0415
    Funny, but Brackin's comments Indiana ring familiar.  He's talking
    like, who, Billy Packer?, MrT?  Aw, he must be sandbagging.
    
    Duke's Grant Hill's prediction:
    
    	"Michigan is more athletic and they bigger (than) either of the
    	UNLV teams we met in the past two NCAA Final Fours.  Vegas had 
    	five good players, Michigan goes seven or eight deep and they 
    	seem to enjoy playing together... They should win the Big Ten
    	this year.  I can't see anybody stoppeng them.  They're the best 
    	team we've faced the last two years."
    
    Brrr !!
    
    Poor MrT 
15.582MrT Pix Big10 All-Frosh Squad ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 07 1992 14:075
    F	Alan Henderson	Indiana
    F	Juwan Howard	Michigan
    C	Chris Webber	Michigan
    G	Jalen Rose	Michigan
    G	Shawn Respert	Michigan State
15.583Antoine goes globalHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelTue Jan 07 1992 14:215
Didn't someone ask something about Antoine Joubert? In any case, he's
been signed by the Mid-Michigan Great Lakers of the Global Basketball
Association. He's still listed as a guard.

TTom
15.584MrT's Big10 PixANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 07 1992 14:3376
    1.	Ohio State	JJ & TB team up with ThunderBurp to make trouble.
    			Their backup C Bill Robinson would be hailed as IU's
    			best middlemain since Ray Tolbert.  This team is
    			deep, experienced, and well-coached.  JJ's trey is
    			up to 54% from last year's 33%.
    
    2.  Michigan	When you have a 6-8 PG who'll probably be the best
    			ballhandler in the conference and who digs driving
    			the lane, shooting treys, stealing balls, blocking
    			shots, and crashing the boards... and he's only 
    			your 2nd best player - this is real bad trouble.
    			Webber is the best frosh in the land.  Howard gives
    			them a nukewidebodystud presence up front.  Talley,
    			last year's best player, is humping to maintain PT.
    			7-2 Eric Riley's much improved but now a sub.  Most
    			talented team in the country in years.
    
    			We cain only pray that Fisher's influence will yield
			poor shot selection, stupid fouls, and the like, but
			don't count it: Chris Webber is running this team.
    			
    			Could easily surprise the Buckeyes and take the Big10.
    
    3. Indiana		Hoosier's crisis in Springfield against the talented
                        was probably the best thing for this flawed team. In
    			an impressive win over talented (and physical) Cincy
    			on the road Bob put Henderson at C and Anderson on
    			the wing, very important cuz Eric is a fine J-shooter
    			and from the wing he'll get more and better shots and
    			this'll somewhat alleviate their obvious shooting
    			woes.
    
    			Hoosiers need someone to take over the team from the
			PG slot.  Passing has improved dramatically but they
			need to put better pressure on the ball.  Also need
    			PGraham back for some outside shooting cuz they'll
    			see zones in Big10.  Maybe "superstar" Damon Bailey
    			can gain consistency with his J.
    
    4. Michigan St.	Respert is best outside shooter in league.  Matt
    			Stegenga is best athlete in league.  Peplowski is
    			strongest C in league.  Great recruiting classes 
    			coming to fruition now.  Could easily surpass Indiana
			if they play with any consistency.
    
    5. Iowa		Only thing holding this squad back is Dr. Malpractice's
			knucklehaided insistence on clinging to that useless
			PermaPress defense with a plodding but physical squad.
			Acie Earl may be slowfooted, but he's tough on the 
    			blocks.
    
    6. Illinois		My surprise pick.  Clemons is a fine guard and Deon
    			is maturing.  They have a passel of role players and
			are playing that tough Illini D.
    
    7. Purdue		6-10 240 Glenn Robinson is, IMNSHO, better than Chris
			Webber in the middle - but he's Prop48.  Woody Austin
			and gang will execute Gene's Bob-like passing game
    			and hang tough in most games.
    
    8. Minnesota	Great frosh guard in Voshon Lenard, but their best
    			player the past two years was PF Randy Carter who
    			shot for high % and banged the boards, and he's going
			down with bone spurs in his feet.  7-1 center Bob
    			Martin is maturing, finally, as a senior.  Young but
			talented squad.  Could surpass Purdue and Illini if
    			Carter stays on and young frosh hold up. 
    
    9. Wisconsin	Tracy Webster is a dynamite PG, but they're backfilling
			for departed Willy Simms and Patrick Tompkins up front.
			Their big people are untested, but big.
    
    10. Northwestern	Could well blow by Wisconsin and move up as high as
    			8th.
    
    MrT
15.585Pat Grahm UpdateDYPSS1::ROPERBRAVO PITINO!Tue Jan 07 1992 15:0622
    MrT, got some news last night on Pat Grahm.  The Louisville Courier
    Journal reported in Sunday's edition that Knight has decided to
    red-shirt Grahm this season.  Grahm apparently just started practicing
    with the team a week or so ago.  Knight decided over the weekend to
    save him for next year.
    
    Also, on my Big-Ten picks, I forgot that OSU was getting Funderberk for
    the Big Ten season.  With that in mind, I'll have to switch my top two.
    
    	1. Ohio State
    	2. Indiana
    	3. Michigan
    	4. Michigan State
    		.
                .
                .
    
    Although Michigan is quite talented, I can't see such a young squad
    surviving the rigors of the Big-Ten and beating the likes of Ohio State
    and Indiana out for the title.
    
    WILDCAT
15.586REFINE::ASHEWhat's this about Creme de Menthe?Tue Jan 07 1992 17:212
    How big is Joubert now?  About 250 pounds?
    
15.587In under the wireCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsTue Jan 07 1992 21:2941
	Predictions:

	1. Ohio State -  Good defense at guard, better at forward (when
	                 JJ's there).  Offensively, a good outside team
                         with the quickness to get to the basket from
                         4 positions, and the strength to get there from
                         2.  But the Wandering One makes the difference.

	2. Indiana - Great defense, but without the shooting abilities of
                     Ohio State.  Matchup problems on the front line with
		     (at least) Ohio State and Michigan.  However, a lot
                     of experience and a lot of talent give them a shot if
                     Funderburke *doesn't* make the difference.

	3. Michigan - Great front line, but should see a lot of foul trouble
                      on the road.  Will they have enough balls to keep 
                      everybody happy?  They'll overwhelm a lot of people,
		      but the experience isn't there (and the coaching might
		      not be either).

	4. Michigan State - Lower expectations than last year, but Jud's
	                    having a lot more fun.  Probably not enough
		            talent to compete for the top.

	5. Iowa - Another mediocre year for another mediocre coach.  Can't
		  wait to see the Hoosiers play against that press in
		  Bloomington.

	6. Purdue - Keady gets the most out of a team with serious weaknesses.

	7. Illinois - They'll play great defense, but after Deon Thomas who
		      is there.

	8. Minnesota - Just a down year.

	9. Northwestern - Not as bad as they've been recently.

	10. Wisconsin - Wisconsin.  


tom
15.588Stay awake for the whole thing...CNTROL::CHILDSIs it a question of Love? hahaaaaaWed Jan 08 1992 11:2711
 I'm glad that ESPN listen to Bobby and gave the Big Ten their own night
 with a leadoff spot. Last night's game was a good opener. As Tom said 
 The Wandering One will be the difference in a good OSU squad and a great
 one.

 Poplowski play a nice strong game for MSU. 

 Wonder if JJ has a chance to take the CPOY away from the "Shack"...

 mike
15.589OLDTMR::RACZKACant cheat with notes, gotta sing emWed Jan 08 1992 15:127
    
    Ohio State  62    (over-rated) MSU  46
    
    Jim Jackson led OSU with 17
    
    Peplowski led MSU with 13
    
15.590FRETZ::HEISERreach out and taunt someoneWed Jan 08 1992 15:3963
Article: 4343
From: peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Randy Peppler)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Big Ten Update (1-8-92)
Date: 8 Jan 92 16:25:34 GMT
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
 
Immediate Results and Upcoming Big Ten games (home teams in CAPS):
 
Jan. 7:		OHIO STATE 62, Michigan State 46:  A very closely contested
		1st half (29-26 OSU) turned into a rather convincing first
		loss for MSU.  The Buckeyes seemed to get a boost out of
		the debut of Lawrence Funderburke, and he played pretty
		well, but has some cobwebs.  Amazing that this guy has only
		played in 6 "organized" games since the end of the 1987-88
		season (his junior year in high school).  Jim Jackson remains
		the man, and came through when needed.  I thought this game
		might be higher scoring than it was.  Jackson led OSU with
		17 points and 9 boards, while Larry had 7 points, 3 boards,
		and 3 blocks.  OSU once led by 19 at 56-37.  I urge everyone
		to tune in on Thursday for the Michigan-Iowa matchup - could
		be the "funnest" Big Ten game in years...  13,276, as always,
		in Columbus...
 
		Penn State at James Madison:  Was this played or is my
		schedule wrong?  I saw no mention of it in USA Today this
		morning...
 
Jan. 8:		Purdue at Illinois (7 pm CST, I'll be there, of course,
		perhaps with bag over head)
		Northwestern at Wisconsin
 
Jan. 9:		Minnesota at Indiana
		Michigan at Iowa (ESPN, 7:30 pm CST)
 
Jan. 11:	Illinois at Michigan State (CBS, 3 pm CST)
		Indiana at Wisconsin
		Iowa at Purdue (7 pm CST)
		Michigan at Minnesota (Raycom/Big Ten Network, 12 pm CST)
		Ohio State at Northwestern
		Morgan State at Penn State
 
 
RECORDS:
 
	Sagarin		Team		All	Conf
	-------		----		---	----
	   6		Ohio State	 9-1	 1-0
	  16		Michigan State	10-1	 0-1
	  13		Michigan	 8-1
	   1		Indiana		 9-2
	  15		Iowa		 8-2
	  99		Penn State	 8-3
	 107		Northwestern	 7-3
	  84		Wisconsin	 9-4
	  65		Purdue		 8-4
	  29		Minnesota	 8-5
	 100		Illinois	 6-4
-- 
-------------------------------
| Randy Peppler               |
| Illinois State Water Survey |
| peppler@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu    |
15.591Young team - all freshman and sophs except 2ANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Wed Jan 08 1992 20:318
    No real Big 10 predictions here, but I'll say my Gophs will go 8-10 in
    conference play.  I will predict this though, the Gophs will win one of
    their first two games.  They have always played IU tough in Bloomington
    under Clem and play anybody tough at home.  Michigan over the Gophs is
    not a gimmie by any means.
    
    
    Spud
15.592ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Fri Jan 10 1992 13:3731
    I like the starting lineup Bob seems to've settled on:
    
    PF - 6-9 Eric Anderson
    SF - 6-6 Calbert Cheaney
    C  - 6-9 Alan Henderson
    OG - 6-2 Damon Bailey
    PG - 6-1 Chris Reynolds
    
    Eric, as I predicted long ago, has taken off with his outside shooting
    now that he's not being planted into the blocks by a much stronger C
    and tiring and ending up in foul trouble.  
    
    Henderson is long-armed and high-jumping and much better in the paint
    that Eric could ever be.  He still looked scary shooting from the
    outside last night though, casually popping 15-20 footers.
    
    The bigger frontline relieves Calbert of pressure on his weak points
    (inside D, rebounding) and frees him up to do more creation with the
    pill.
    
    Damon is finally showing signs that he cain be consistent from the 
    outside.  Chris or GGraham will never be great shooters, but both 
    have the the ability to penetrate the zone and dish or drive.  These
    three along with Jamaal Meeks are showing relentless pressure D.
    
    The team is thin up front, but experienced and blessed with good 
    quickness.  They've seem to've pretty much mastered Bob's system with
    few breakdowns.  They could be dangerous and maybe even threaten the
    Buckeyes and the Michigans for the Big10 Title.
    
    MrT
15.593Good enough to overcome adversity?CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsTue Jan 14 1992 20:5113
	Well, after much discussion with the Mildcat over the last couple
of days, I'd planned to predict a 7-point Hoosier victory tonight (something
like 82-75).  HOWEVER...
	
	Columbus, OH television just reported that Alan Henderson, Eric
Anderson, and Damon Bailey all have strep.  Henderson was reported as being
out for the night, with Anderson and Bailey likely playing.  Given this,
I suspect the Buckeyes might be able to beat the Hoosiers up (again) on the
front line.  So...

	Ohio State 75, Indiana 68

tom
15.594What a pleasant surpriseCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsTue Jan 14 1992 23:4122
	Ok, so what do I know anyway.

	Ohio State showed little board strength and less shooting, especially
in the first half.  Mostly, however, they showed a complete lack of emotion
and composure.  Ayers has to be really disappointed with the number of bad 
shots that were put up in the first half, no matter how good IU's defense was.

	The Hoosiers, on the other hand, once again got a monstrous effort out
of Greg Graham.  Over the last six or eight games he's easily been their best
player, and along with Anderson has given them the outside game they need to
be competitive.  I didn't think Bailey showed any ill effects of flu/strep, 
but Anderson clearly seemed to tire late.


	A very good effort by a team that's been playing very, very well.

tom

	I agree with Dicky V, by the way.  A time-out was clearly in order. 
I would have been shocked if one had been called much sooner than it was,
however.
15.595DYPSS1::ROPERTHE MONSTER MASHWed Jan 15 1992 00:3920
    Tom, great game by IU.  IMO, Ohio State looked pathetic on offense. 
    Mark Baker and co. were throwing up garbage at crucial points of the
    game.  They seemed to have no patience offensively.  
    
    To beat IU, especially at home, you need offensive patience.  A team
    must be prepared for a physical, hard fought contest.  Nothing comes
    easy in Bloomington.  OSU was playing way too much one-on-one
    basketball.  
    
    IU played extremely well considering the loss of Henderson, Anderson
    ailing, etc.  Remember folks, this is the same team that many thought
    was the best team in the country heading into the NCAA's last season. 
    Don't let MrT fool you!  GET A T.O. MrT!  You're gonna have to do some
    serious back peddling!
    
    BTW, Knight almost let the game slip away when OSU went on their 21-2
    run.  Luckily, Calbert entered the game with 12 minutes to play saddled
    with four fouls and played flawlessly the remainder of the contest.
    
    WILDCAT
15.596Main, dem Hoosiers gots some talent!AXIS::ROBICHAUDHOMER,PLATO,VOLTAIRE,bobknightWed Jan 15 1992 09:311
    
15.597Knight ought have somebody cheapshot Bailey early every game ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSThis note sure gone crazyWed Jan 15 1992 09:4210
 and if Meeks can learn to hit that bomb consistently and take it a little
 more often this team becomes downright scary. If Pat Graham hadn't got hurt
 Chris Reynolds would have been redshirted. I like Graham but it's hard to
 imagine him bring more to the floor than Chris. Yet Knight would have went
 with a weaker team in order to help the kid develop into an even better
 player. What a guy....

 mike    

15.598Still no T ? Talk about runnin' skeert !EARRTH::BROOKSHarem guards, geldings, MrTWed Jan 15 1992 11:501
    
15.599Could be real tough come tourney timeSCNDRL::HUNTKiller Ninja Nuns At The OK CorralWed Jan 15 1992 11:535
Any thoughts of Indiana's demise are also exaggerated.   They've got lots 
of talent and the best coach in the game.   They may not make a title run 
this year but you can't help but think that Knight is gearing up for one.

Bob Hunt
15.600DYPSS1::ROPERTHE MONSTER MASHWed Jan 15 1992 12:315
    They better gear up for a run real quick Bob.  Their window of
    opportunity is this year and next.  After next season, they lose the
    farm.  Bob better have a quality recruiting crop next October.
    
    WILDCAT
15.601ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYUnitasGrieseMontanaMarinoElwayFri Jan 17 1992 12:5031
    Yeah IU has lotsa talent but unfortunately that doesn't include 
    shooting guard or center.  Other than that, they're loaded with 
    quickness, a refreshing thing looking back to the plodding days
    of Alford & Co., who couldn't guard the quick guys at all.
    
    IU's played 4 top teams and have gone 2-2.  The major question to
    take out a this game is how much a it was emotion (the Hoosier
    players hated ThunderBurp's guts when he was in Bloomington, the
    game had big Big10 Title implications) and how much a it was superb
    execution of Bob's system, which when properly run cain imbue a squad
    with "machine like" properties that enable them to play at a very high
    level.
    
    My guess is the latter.  They should lose about 4 games in the Big10
    and drop to 10-15 in the standings, but then they make their run.  If
    Henderson steps in nicely at C this team could be dangerous.  They'll
    still be susceptible to foul trouble for lack a front-line depth
    against aircraft carrier squads like UCLA, but they'll be good.  If 
    GGraham and Damon cain continue to shoot well.
    
    Purty smart a Bob to take MrT's advice and compensate for poor outside
    shooting guards by slashing them inside to pick up beaucoup FTs or to
    dish.
    
    re 1
    
    This year's recruiting class didn't even make the ratings in Basketball
    Weekly.  It's all or nothing once the juniors (GGraham, Reynolds, Meeks,
    Cheaney, et al) leave.
    
    MrT
15.602IU fan lost in the EastROULET::KATTAUMon Jan 20 1992 11:276
    
    
    	Did IU win on Saturday?  How did they look?
    
    
    	Kat
15.6034 down, 14 to goCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Jan 20 1992 13:0724
	Hoosiers won 96-62 at Northwestern on Saturday night.  Calbert 
Cheaney, who'd been averaging about 11 shots a game while spending most
of the season in foul trouble, took 12 shots in the first half and ended
up with 26(?) points for the game.  He also stayed OUT of foul trouble for
the first time in recent memory.  Bailey and Graham continued their good
play of recent games, and Alan Henderson was back from his bout with 
strep/flu, although he wasn't full speed.  He's expected to be 100% by
Tuesday night, when Michigan and the Fab Five come to Bloomington (7:30 EST,
ESPN).

	Two interesting items about Michigan:

	First, the best line I've yet heard about the "greatest recruiting
class ever".  This from a sports talk show host in Fort Wayne: "The problem with
the Wolverines is that they don't play the game with enough basketballs.
Michigan needs four - three for Jalen Rose and one for everybody else."

	Second, I read that the players are actually having discussions with
the news media on WHAT THEIR NICKNAME SHOULD BE.  That's right, five college
freshmen who've never won anything are concerned about what the media call them.
Easy to see why they didn't end up at Indiana, NC or any of a dozen other 
schools that wouldn't put up with that kind of attitude.

tom
15.604ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Jan 20 1992 13:4221
    Hey Tom, picking up that good 100,000 watt WOWO all the way down
    in Dayton?  
    
    Some impressions: Indiana has played its two tougher games (OSU
    & Minny) at home, two cupcakes ont he road...  Michigan has picked 
    up two Ws against toughies (Iowa and Illini) on the road and have
    also played and lost to relative toughie Minny away from home...
    Lawrence ThunderBurp is as talented as they say, but based on his
    low-class behavior I'm glad he left Hoosierland... Purdue's W at
    Crisler arena had one mind-blowing stat: they outrebounded the 
    Fab Five or 5 Xs or whatever in the hell they're called 40-20 !!...
    I think Prop48 Glenn Robinson is better than Chris Webber, so who
    knows how good Purdue will be next year... Indiana will lose two
    players to graduation and both are front-liners on a team very weak
    along the baseline, Anderson and Nover, which'll leave then-senior
    Calbert, Lindemann, and red-shirt Evans, only 3 front-liners, which
    is scary cuz the only recruit thus far this year is a 6-3 guard, so
    next year's senior-laden class mighty weak up front in a conference
    filling up with widebodies...
    
    MrT
15.605Wandering One has an attitude, don't he?CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Jan 20 1992 18:3624
	Actually, hard as it is to believe, I think Nover's one of those "is
he EVER going to graduate" kind of guys.  If I remember correctly, he was in
the same class as Anderson and Meeks, but a red-shirt year makes him a junior
in eligibility.  Assuming he's back, combining him with Cheaney, Lindemann,
Henderson, and Evans should leave the Hoosiers in decent shape on the front
assuming Lindemann's good enough to play next year.  He's not this year.  Add
in a returning Pat Graham (and a returning Pat Knight) and things shouldn't
look bad at all.  There'll be a lot of quickness and talent to replace the
year after that, but that's way too far ahead to worry about.

	WOWO comes in clear as a bell most nights.  A few hours from now
I'll be sitting down to listen to the BobKnight "call-in" show.  For those
of you who can get it (WOWO, 1190 AM out of Fort Wayne, IN) I'd recommend
giving it a listen.  For better or worse, it's definitely NOT your 
run-of-the-mill coaches show.  

	Word out of Columbus is that the coaches have been working really
hard on Funderburke trying to get him to tone it down a bit.  They think
he got a bad call and bad press on the foul against Bailey, but are worried
about the extra-curricular shoving that he participated in during the IU
game.  Might be why he didn't get the start against Iowa over Bill "The Ultimate
Stiff" Robinson.

tom
15.606Golden GophersANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Mon Jan 20 1992 20:3710
    Gotta love my Gophs so far, 3-1 and second place to themselves. 
    They've already beaten two ranked teams in Michigan and MSU and won at
    Wisconsin for the first time in Clem's tenure here.  Tough game coming
    up at OSU on Wednesday night.  I'm hoping for a split this week as
    Illinois comes in on Sat.
    
    Minnesota's home magic seems to be back!
    
    
    Spud
15.607WOWO - Sweet Memories :-)DYPSS1::ROPERTHE MONSTER MASHMon Jan 20 1992 23:0925
    Glad to hear there are some WOWO fans out there.  Being from Fort
    Wayne, I listened to WOWO regularly.  I can remember many a night
    staying up late to here the Fort Wayne Komets play their International
    Hockey League foes.
    
    Since the subject is radio talk shows, there are a couple of other good
    ones to check out.
    
    1. 700 WLW.  This show comes from Cincinnati.  All in all, I think WLW
    has the best sports talk show that I've ever heard.  Chris
    Collingsworth (former wideout for the Bengals) is the host.  Andy
    Furman is another outrageous character on the show.  The show runs from
    6-9 every evening.  WLW is a 50,000 watt station.
    
    2. 84 WHAS.  WHAS is also 50,000 watts.  WHAS IMHO has the best college
    basketball coverage in the Mid-West.  No other station gives anywhere
    near as good of roundball and football recruiting coverage as WHAS. 
    WHAS also covers all Louisville and Kentucky basketball games.  I
    picked up WHAS when I was in Maine last year, so I know thos up East
    should be able to get it.  Same goes for WLW.
    
    Both WHAS, and WLW have toll-free numbers that you can call to voice
    your opinion.
    
    WILDCAT
15.608CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RTue Jan 21 1992 11:402
	Both WLW and WHAS come in fine here in Atlanta.  I have often listened
	to Reds games on WLW in the past few years.
15.609ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 21 1992 15:3518
    Well, the Hoosiers have the Fab Five or 5 Xs or whatever in Assembly
    Hall tonight.  Every tough game for the Hoosiers has been at home
    thus far, while Michigan has impressed like hell for frosh taking
    two road wins at Illinois and Iowa.
    
    You cain bet that Bob'll look at the films a Purdue's startling
    road win at Crisler, trying to figure how in the world the Boilers
    took 40 rebounds from an all-nuke front-line.  
    
    Damon's played very well lately, taking the leadership role.  Ditto
    for GGraham, who may actually have learned how to jump shoot.  Hope
    they keep it up and that Calbert doesn't get into early foul trouble
    against the nukes on the baseline.  Should be brutal.
    
    I'm most excited about seeing Alan going up against Chris.  If he does
    well against the #1 frosh then he's really something...
    
    MrT
15.610A win's a win, but...CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Jan 22 1992 01:2816
	Difficult 15-point win for the Hoosiers over the Wolverines
tonight.  Michigan was hurt badly by their inexperience on the defensive
end, resulting in open jump shots for the Hoosiers and lots of fouls (tough
being a freshman on the road in the Big Ten).  No real bright spots for 
Indiana --- they looked tired and the concerns about whether they'll be able
to hold up against the powerful front lines around the country are back.  
Cheaney didn't have a prayer with Juwann Howard, and Anderson didn't look 
much better.  Henderson, recovered or not, looked a lot like a kid compared 
to both Howard AND Webber.  If they find a point guard for next year and 
everyone stays around (and stays happy), Michigan has a chance to be 
seriously good next season.

	Next up for Indiana: Purdue at home on January 28.  The week off
should do them good.

tom
15.611I see Michigan, I see Orange. huh? CNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationWed Jan 22 1992 10:0212
 Maybe Jalen will get it together Tom and Michigan will have their point. 
 Definately the worst I've seen Anderson play in a long time offensively
 but as usual he did contribute in other ways. I thought Damon's more
 aggressive offensive style and Reynolds and Graham defense were bright
 spots. What Novar? 2 buckets in the first 5 minutes of the game? I almost
 fainted. Too bad he revert back to form in the second half. 

 Fisher better wake up and take over his team otherwise I see them falling
 short of their potential. 

 mike
15.612NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 22 1992 12:239
    I still like Indiana's chances in this year's tourney.  They're
    talented, disciplined and they've got the master at the helm.  If
    anyone can give Duke a run for the title this spring, I think it's
    Indiana, Ohio State, or UCLA (all longshots still, but everyone 
    else is off the board).
    
    glenn
    
15.613Miller would have to stay out of foul troubleCNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationWed Jan 22 1992 13:589
 Glenn, I'd put Arkansas in the group as well especially if Nolad doesn't have
 to do too much coaching. Another team that might have a shot at Duke is UCONN.
 They're talented, experienced and have the revenge factor having been sent
 home the last two years by Duke. 

 UNC? they'll be home long before they'd have a chance....

 mike
15.614BSS::JCOTANCHWed Jan 22 1992 17:355
    I was impressed with Oklahoma State the other night.  This team is not
    just Byron Houston (sp?), either.  They have an excellent backcourt and
    some good depth.
    
    Joe
15.615DECWET::METZGER/Slasher welshes on a bet?Wed Jan 22 1992 17:5011
I was also. They showed great composure in not getting caught up in Oklahoma's 
run and gun offense. Especially after the first 3-4 minutes when the shots were
flowing like junk notes.

As was even more impressed with UMass's win over Oklahoma as a result of this
game. 

Which is a very nice thing :-)

Metz
15.616ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDon Robichaud = /Daidbeat DonWed Jan 22 1992 19:4740
    I agree that Oklahoma St., Arkansas, and UCONN also have a legit shot
    at Duke.  By season's end I think a powerful Zona squad will too.
    
    What worries me about the Hoosiers is that they'll spend the last month
    playing all the tough opponents on the road (they've played the Big10's
    only two cupcakes, NW & Wisc., on the road and will have played OSU,
    Michigan, Minny, and Purdue at home.  So the stage is set for them to
    prove themselves down the stretch on the road.  They'll either hold up
    to the road pressure or show cracks, I think they need to go 3-3 on the
    road against OSU/State/Michigan/Purdue/Minny/Iowa to come into the
    tourney poised to make a run at a Title.
    
    As Tom said IU showed their deficiencies along the front-line last
    night, having shots blocked/changed and giving up O-rebounds by the
    lot.  On the other hand had they shot well from the stripe they woulda
    put the game away much earlier.  If "coach" Steve Fisher had run in
    the first half the O-set he ran in the second Michigan woulda won.  
    
    Bob clearly is looking for the perimeter shooting to establish itself.
    They started out bombing, with Damon and Reynolds (of all people)
    canning treys.  Then it was boing boing boing, and they had to go back
    to the weave n' pick offense to get those sweet foul shots.
    
    It woulda been easy for Bob to cave in when Talley and Voskuil started
    canning those treys that Indiana was daring them to shoot as they
    collapsed on Howard and Webber.  But he stuck with his plan and it
    worked.  With the Hoosiers' lack a inside muscle had they spread the
    defense I think Michigan woulda ran wild along the baseline.
    
    Damon Bailey has arrived.  All the guards are showing great intensity.
    True Calbert was helpless against Juwan but looking at how close he
    was covering him I think only Shack coulda stopped him in that 2nd
    half.  
    
    Look for Alan Henderson to blossom big-time in the 2nd half of the
    conference season.  This kid is a lot tougher mentally than I ever 
    expected him to be at this young age.  Maybe it's natural for a son of
    a heart surgeon to not be prone to nervousness...
    
    MrT
15.617FRETZ::HEISERreach out and taunt someoneWed Jan 22 1992 20:147
>    I agree that Oklahoma St., Arkansas, and UCONN also have a legit shot
>    at Duke.  By season's end I think a powerful Zona squad will too.
    
    From what I've seen of UCLA, I'd add them to the list too.  They were
    impressive in their win in Tucson, especially Maclean!
    
    AridZona always starts slow.  Must be a Lute Olson team trademark.
15.618ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDon Robichaud = /Daidbeat DonWed Jan 22 1992 20:475
    UCLA was in Waugamain's original Duke hit-list.  Based on their
    physical talent, depth, and newfound maturity, I consider the
    UCLAns to be definitely #2, and maybe the best of all.
    
    MrT 
15.619ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDon Robichaud = /Daidbeat DonWed Jan 22 1992 21:097
    I also consider Jim Jackson to be the best player in the nation 
    right now.  The more I see him the more I realize that he doesn't
    have a single flaw in his game.  Great J shooter, cain post up,
    cain dribble to the hoop from either side, great rebounder guard,
    fine D-player, superb passer... he cain do it all.  
    
    MrT
15.620FRETZ::HEISERreach out and taunt someoneWed Jan 22 1992 21:321
    does he MWWTB (Move Well Without The Ball) ala Jim Paxson? ;-)
15.621Gophs lose a close oneANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Thu Jan 23 1992 12:3424
    Gophs battled and lost a close one in Columbus last night.  They were
    up eight in the first half, but trailed by one at intermission.  The
    Gophers went cold to start the second half and eventually found
    themselves down by 13 midway through the second half.  Slowly but
    surely, they made their way back and with about two minutes to go they
    started nailing three pointers.  After hitting about four in a row (in
    between fouling to kill the clock) they cut it down to one point. 
    After two more OSU FT's the Gophs had two chances to tie in the final
    30 seconds.  The first shot was a good one to take and went off the
    rim, but they got the rebound.  With 16 seconds left, McDonald must've
    panicked, because he lauched about a 25 footer.  It was way off and
    that was the game.  
    
    Playing without Randy Carter now, some of us thought the Gophs would
    have a tough time the rest of the way, but instead they seem to be
    getting better.  They're playing the big boys even up and right now
    I don't see any reason why they couldn't beat anyone (including
    Indiana) at home this year.
    
    For such a young team I thought they'd be a year or two off, but they
    may be ready sooner.
    
    
    Spud
15.622ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDon Robichaud = /Daidbeat DonThu Jan 23 1992 15:3022
    Is Ohio State as good as thought?  They were lucky to win at home
    against a Gopher squad minus its best player Randy Carter.  Somehow
    the Gophs manage to scratch and scrape and drag better teams down
    into an ugly low percentage game that leaves them a shot at winning.
    I think that horrific 45 point blowout in Bloomington hardened this
    young team.  Arriel McDonald looked like the world's worst outside
    shooter last year and this year he's scary with the trey, as is 
    Townsend Orr.  
    
    Allegedly 7-0 C Bob Martin (looks more like 7-2 to me) started off
    great blocking shots and boards and then, after a few bad exchanges,
    did his usual disappearing act - hard to do when you're that big and
    a redhaid to boot.  If the insonsistent Martin had showed up for the
    2nd half OSU woulda lost.  
    
    Lawrence ThunderBurp was all over the map last night, playing outta
    control, making stupid mistakes, and giving up on D.  Burp looks like
    he's always trying to make the spectacular play at the expense of his
    floorgame.  One wonders how long the tough-minded Ayers will tolerate
    this.
    
    MrT
15.623Mornin'ANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Fri Jan 24 1992 12:3842
    MrT, you're wishy-washy.
    
    First you say the Gophs are going to be better than expected this year,
    then after some losses you say they're not going to do very well.  Then
    again the other day after the MSU win you say "I told you they were
    going to be good."  Make up your mind, will ya?!!!
    
    Let's get a couple of things straight.  McDonald has NOT had a good
    season really, he has shot terrible overall.  Witness his poor
    judgement as well on the ill-advised shot to tie it from 25+ feet when
    they had plenty of time to work for one much better.  The Gophers best
    player is NOT Randy Carter.  Someday he could be, but with Voshon
    Leonard, I doubt it.  Right now the Gophers two best players are
    Leonard and Kolander, both freshman.  Orr has really come on the last
    couple of games nailing four and five three's in each.  He'll very
    likely take PT away from McDonald.  
    
    As for the Gophers scratching and scraping, hey, it's the Big10 way
    and if you're going to survive, you'd better learn how to deal with it.
    How does IU do it "without the big man?"
    
    The bad loss at Indiana was ugly, no question about it.  Clem has
    mentioned a couple of times that he intentionally let it get out of
    hand once they were out of it - to teach the young team a lesson that
    you have to be ready to play. (and remember, after trailing 44-18 at
    the half, they closed it to 12!!  This being one of your arguments a 
    couple of years ago when the Gophs blew out IU here by about 30.  IU
    had cut that lead to all of 18 and you were giving it the "moral
    victory" speech)
    
    Let's give the Gophs a little credit here.  They've had one bad game
    out of six.  OSU is good, the Gophs executed and were prepared to play.
    They almost pulled it out.  
    
    I think you are (again) skeered that IU is gonna have a tough time
    here.
    
    Now, the REAL question is whether you will keep your reply to 100 lines
    or less...
    
    
    Spud  :*)       
15.624ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDon Robichaud = /Daidbeat DonFri Jan 24 1992 18:269
    Randy Carter is their best player.  Voshon Lenard has disappeared the
    last few games.  Carter is the Gophers' best rebounder and inside 
    player on D and offense.  He's the one the NBA scouts are panting over.
    
    Voshon for now at least is high school press clippings.  He looked for
    real against Minnesota's annual cupcake nonconf schedule and has gone
    into the tank since the Big10 started.
    
    MrT
15.625VLAB::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Jan 28 1992 15:584
       Anyone else notice that the Loosiers are on ESPN AGAIN tonight?
    Seems like every time you look there's red belly again. Think he paid
    off those made for TV types?
                                            Denny
15.626cakewalkCTHQ2::LEARYLook what they've done to my song,MawTue Jan 28 1992 16:293
    Will the 'Boilers upset the poor Hoosiers at their pit??
    Nah.
    
15.627I'll be watching, but don't expect the upset ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Jan 28 1992 17:138
    No way can Purdue beat the Hoosiers, who are one very scary unit at the
    moment.  Credit Carolina for pasting the Boilermakers though.  Purdue
    has turned into a very solid club, which adds value (from an NCAA
    Tourney Selection Committee perspective) on our solid 'W' at the Smith
    Center.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.628ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDon't mess with MrT !! [macho]Tue Jan 28 1992 17:3816
    I'm not so sure about that.  The Boilers rolled into Crisler and 
    banged the Fab5 for a 40-20 rebounding edge.  Don't know how they
    managed it, given the huge size and athletic ability of Michigan,
    but Gene Keady always manages very well with the hand he's dealt.
    
    Purdue must have some muscle.  Indiana is acknowledged as having
    weakness inside.  If the Boilers cain work their game plan and Woody
    cain pump it up the Boilers could win going away.
    
    IU is the type of team that must execute at a very high level or
    they've got big problems, especially against a team with a rock 'em
    sock 'em baseline.
    
    Should be fun.
    
    MrT
15.629IU will rooolCTHQ1::LEARYLook what they've done to my song,MawTue Jan 28 1992 19:3711
    Should be fun for you, MrT.
    
    No way cain the 'makers win going away. Not in that red'n'white lion's
    den. Michigan can be very undisciplined as you saw and Purdue (on home
    court under Keady's tutelage) had the master plan. No way cain he 
    defeat the Master at home. BK owns Keady at home jest like he
    owned Phelps everywhere. Purdue'l make a run, but like OSU and UM,
    will go down to the Red Scourge. And you know it well.
    
    MikeL
    
15.630The WideBodyStuds vs. The BookwormsAXIS::ROBICHAUDPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Jan 28 1992 19:381
    
15.6316 down, 12 to goCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Jan 29 1992 01:2628
	This one was over early.  Purdue has a *serious* quickness
problem at guard.  You can get away with that against a Michigan team
that doesn't have much guard play, but the Hoosiers have (I believe) the
best defense at guard in the country right now.

	The really bright spot of this game, besides the fact that it was
Indiana's largest margin of victory ever over the Boilers, was the continued
excellent play of Calbert Cheaney.  He's not o looking for shots, he's
playing good defense and hitting the boards hard.  If he continues to play
this well, things will stay opened up for Bailey, Anderson, and Graham, and
scoring shouldn't be a problem on most nights.

	Disappointed, but not surprised, to hear that they might redshirt
Lindemann next year.  Hope they won't be leaving themselves a little short
on the front line.

	Next week will make four straight Tuesdays on ESPN.  The other
coaches in the leagues are calling the new schedule Bob Knight Tuesday.
Very wierd arrangement, but shouldn't hurt recruiting any.

	Next up:  Michigan St. on Saturday in East Lansing

tom

	
    

15.632ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 11:3029
    re 2
    
    Cool p_name, /Donny !!  But you air: Purdue awaits nuke widebody  C
    Glenn Robinson to roll off a prop48.  Meanwhile IU ain't never tasted
    the prop48 meat.
    
    re 1
    
    One key is that with Alan in the middle Eric cain play facing the hoop
    where he's much more effective, and also less prone to tiring and foul
    woes.  Another is the emergence of GGraham.  He's a totally different
    player from last year, and a much better one.  Those "torture camp"
    practices are really paying off and he looks like an NBA prospect all
    of a sudden.
    
    Damon Bailey too.His defense has shown up, finallly.  
    
    Speaking a beat-camp phsyco-torture (which Dr. Inga would deplore if 
    the myth were true, but isn't) what about all those victims, all those
    mentally devastated ex-players sitting behind the Bob-bench last night?
    I guess John Moneystein would say the brainwashing paid off eh?
    
    This Bob-squad is, IMNSHO, executing the Bob-system at the highest
    level, right now at least, ball handling, picking, weaving, defending,
    passing, shot selecting, lane filling, and everything else since the
    75-76 squad.  Wouldn't be prudent to swing them nito that level a 
    proficiency, not as physically talented, but O what a "team"!
    
    MrT
15.633ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 11:4815
    The Hoosiers are 6-0 in the Big10 yet have not played a tought road
    game yet, having played only two on the road and those against the
    Mildcats and the Badgers.  There is steal much for them to prove and
    their stretch drive is gonna be brutal with trips to Ohio State,
    Minnesota, Ohio State, and Illinois.
    
    We'll see.  Is the State game in East Lansing?
    
    Btw, the other Big10 coaches are sneering that ESPN's Tuesday night
    should be renamed "Bob Knight Tuesday on ESPN."  I agree!  Should
    help recruiting, which right now is not looking too good.
    
    Hey Tom, any news on this 6-3 kid IU recruited out a Terre Haute South?
    
    MrT
15.634ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 11:495
    whoops, they ain't gonna play Ohio State twice in that stretch drive
    on the road, my mistake.  It'll be MIchigan, Minnesota, Ohio State,
    Illinois.
    
    MrT
15.635Will the shame never end?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jan 29 1992 12:388
    
   > <<< Note 15.634 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Plato,Homer,Voltiare,BobKnight" >>>
                                                         ^^^^^^^^
    
    A vicious and unwarranted slur on Francois Voltaire!
    
    glenn
    
15.636AXIS::ROBICHAUDPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 13:446
    	So MorT, are you actually saying that this Whoosier team,
    should/could have some expectations placed on them?  That maybe
    they have a little more talent than say, Northwestern or Amherst
    College?
    
    				/Don
15.637CNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationWed Jan 29 1992 13:4516
 Personally I wouldn't mind if they showed IU every tuesday nite. The way
 they excute their offense is a joy to watch and Chris Reynolds on defense
 is worth the price of admission all by himself.

 I think Bob's real happy with this team. If he wasn't he'd have reamed GGraham
 six ways to sunday over that showboating missed dunk. Especially considering
 just a minute before he tried to jam one home instead of dishing the rock to
 the trailer. 

 Alan Henderson keeps improving. If he can continue they just might take the
 big one...

 mike

 
15.638ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 14:3918
    >   So MrT, are you actually saying that this Hoosier team, should/
    >could have some expectations blah blah blaa-aah...
    
    I from the beginning have documented that these Hoosiers are at a
    talent level well above the recent past including the '87 Titleists.
    But unlike the Titleists they don't have a true center and have shown
    a propensity for getting beat up along the baseline even when they're
    winning.  Going up against a nuke-widebody operation they'll need to
    continue shooting from the outside picking up forced fouls and
    executing at their current high level a efficiency or they're daidmeat.
    
    Which is exactly what Dick Vitale said last night and I agree.
    
    Btw, it sure looks like "the most diappointing team of the year" has
    benefited mightily from the benchings and reamings that befell Eric/
    Calbert/Damon, eh?
    
    MrT
15.6391992 HOOSIERS = 1975 HOOSIERS!DYPSS1::ROPERNFC RULES!Wed Jan 29 1992 14:4227
    Simply AMAZING!  All of a sudden we have IU and Bob Knight supporters
    crawling out of the woodwork!  Where oh where were you MrT, when only
    ACC Chris and the WILDCAT were proclaiming IU to be a Final Four team
    at the beginning of the season?  I believe it was you who was belly
    aching about this being one of the *POOREST* IU teams in recent memory. 
    Now all of a sudden they're being mentioned in the same breath as the
    '75-'76 teams!!!
    
    Someone stop me, I'm laughing myself to death!!!  Let's see if I
    understand how this little game works.  I think that UK is really a
    pretty pitiful squad having only one *LEGITIMATE* college player in
    Jamal Mashburn.  Therefore I think they'll only win one more game the
    rest of the season.  That game being the one tonight in Lexington
    against Ole Miss.  Now, If I follow correctly, if UK wins more than one
    game that must mean that Rick Pitino is the greatest coach on the
    PLANET!!!
    
    Ha, Ha, Ha!  You IU fans certainly have a great *MARKETING PLOY*!  
    
    Face if B-Ball fans, if IU doesn't make it to at least the final eight
    this year, it will be a major choke to be explained by one Bob Knight. 
    If they don't make the Final Four, it can be considered at the very
    least to be a *VERY POOR COACHING* job turned in by Bob Knight.
    
    HTH's
    
    WILDCAT
15.640MrT oughta work for the SuperBowlHypeCommitteeRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Jan 29 1992 14:549
    Here, here, 'Cat!  Not only that but just yesterday I predicted that
    there was no way a very skeery IU outfit was not gonna lay an awful
    pasting on Purdue.  MorT countered by saying he thought_a upset was
    possible.
    
    Result?  Gene Keady's worst loss of all time!  Ha!!11
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.641poor Rope is having a /Don-Crock fantasy attackANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 15:5343
    >1192 HOOSIERS = 1975 HOOSIERS!
    
    Never said that.  Said something quite different.  Your failure to
    show a quote on this will stand as tacit admission of your misquote.
    
    >I believe it was you who was bellyaching about this being one of the
    >*POOREST* IU teams in recent memory.
    
    Never said that either.  The record will show that I said they were
    overrated as a preseason #2 due to a weak frontline and the widebody
    UCLAn nukes and Jamaal Mashburn proved me right.  I also went on to
    say that these Hoosiers would go into a tumult (they did, with their
    three stars hitting the bench) absorb some losses, sink in the ratings
    to about 18th (didn't happen, they sunk to about 10th with inspiring
    wins at St. John's and Cincinnati) and then move back into the top
    ten.
    
    Your failure to show a quote on this will stand as tacit admission that
    you misquoted me.
    
    I still may be roughly right on IU's season.  They haven't played a
    tough road game in weeks (Cincinnati) and must go to East Lansing and
    then on to six additional toughies and history tells us that they'll
    probably pick up 2-4 losses en route, which'd leave them with 4-6
    total losses and somewhere in the lower half of the top ten, which is
    where I said they'd end up anyway.
    
    Setting aside your self-serving fantasies, tellit: IU has no true
    center and absolutely no depth along the front-line.  They don't have
    anybody to match up against a big guard.  Their outside shooting has
    been inconsistent at best.
    
    On the other hand, with young Alan holding his own in the middle and
    Eric facing the basket and Calbert finally playing some D, if their
    shooting holds up at about 50% from the floor executing at the level
    they are right now they'll be nearly impossible to beat unless you're
    Duke/Arkansas/UCLA or somesuch.
    
    Hope this helps clear up joe self-serving fuzzy-haided "mistakes."
    
    You're welcome.
    
    MrT
15.642IU fans .neq. termitesCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Jan 29 1992 16:2111
	According to the post-game reports, Knight was trying very hard to get
hot about Graham's slam-brick, but one of the assistants pointed to the score
and he just let it go.  Bet it comes up in the film session, though.

	Haven't heard anything at all about what kind of senior year Steve
Hart from Terre Haute is having, but I don't see him getting much PT next year
anyway.

tom (who's never been in any woodwork, but think's Eric Anderson's disappearing
     into it on a regular basis)
15.643ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 18:014
    Whoa, but Eric's been canning the treys and Js.  Much needed in light
    of the doubles Calbert was seeing earlier in the year.
    
    MrT
15.644ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jan 29 1992 18:557
    Hey Tom, does Bob have another scholarship to give for next year
    or is he done? 
    
    Lesee, Nover and Eric graduate, but PatKnight, PGraham, and Brian
    Evans come in from the redshirt.
    
    MrT
15.645If they're so bad, how'd they beat IU?CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Jan 29 1992 20:1311
T,

	If you figure 13 current players (10 plus 3 redshirts), the loss of 
Anderson and Meeks and the addition of Hart, they should have 1 scholarship
left they could use for next year.  I doubt if they'll use it, though.  It's
unlikely there's anybody left for the spring signing period that will be good
enough to use it on.  More likely they'll save it till next fall and hope they
can put it to good use for the following season, when they'll really need some
help.

tom
15.646ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Jan 30 1992 13:0617
    I thought Meeks was a junior and Nover a senior.   Whatever, here might
    be the starting lineup for next year:
    
    F Calbert
    F Brian Evans
    C Alan
    G Damon
    G GGraham
    
    Of course, PGrhaham might end up at F in a small lineup, but I doubt he
    has the physicality needed there - especially with a small nonphysical
    forward like Calbert on the other side.
    
    Who knows, maybe as his PT slides in favor of Salvidori Montross might
    rn to t homeland and start learning how  play the game right.
    
    MrT
15.647CNTROL::CHILDSthat Sir, is a_inebriate fabricationThu Jan 30 1992 14:067
>Who knows, maybe as his PT slides in favor of Salvidori Montross might
>rn to t homeland and start learning how  play the game right.
   
  But Purdue will have Robinson next year. Oh I see, he'll sit on the bench
  and learn from Glenn. Oh yeah good idea....

 ;^)   
15.648nukewideobystudcityANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Jan 30 1992 15:389
    I've seen Glenn Robinson play (in IHSAA Title game, where he smoked
    Alan Henderson, and in a All-Star tilt) and this guy is awesome.
    Once Gene Keady gets ahold of a talent a this magnitude (many in 
    Hoosierland regard him as the best out a the state since Shawn Kemp
    and then Larry Bird before that) look for Purdue to make a serious
    run against Michigan/Indiana/Ohio State for a Big10 crown and maybe
    more...
    
    MrT
15.649CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsThu Jan 30 1992 23:0612
T,

	It's not just Robinson either.  They've got a JC transfer sitting
out this year named Kenny Williams.  People who've seen him at games say he's
about an inch taller than Robinson, and a little bulkier.  He apparently more
than holds his own with Robinson in practices.

	Steve Hart, btw, apparently has been averaging about 26 points, 7
boards, 5 assists, 3 steals, and 3 blocks.  Should be a big help for the
Hoosiers in a couple of years when the current group of guards is all gone.

tom
15.650CTHQ2::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsFri Jan 31 1992 12:0811
    IU boys,
    
    If my memory doesn't fail me, hasn't IU handled Purdue pretty
    well over the years? Not putting Keady down, but rarely do
    the Boilers worry the Hoosiers in Bloomington, n-est-ce-pas?
    And occasionally they give IU a tussle in West Lafayette.
    Plenty of things cain happen in a year,sheeeit, enjoy this one
    as you could be dancin' in Minny come spring.
    
    MikeL
    
15.651CNTROL::CHILDSWilt,Dean,Clyde,BigBadJohnFri Jan 31 1992 12:208
 Actually Mike, Purdue leads the series all time by a wide margin. They 
 mentioned the stats the other night and it was 95 + wins for Purdue and 55+ 
 for IU. Bobby is better than 500 against them and Keady is slight less than
 500 against them. Of all the teams in the Big Ten I would venture a quess
 that Purdue has given them the most trouble...

 mike
15.652CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Jan 31 1992 12:258
	Purdue leads the all-time series by a lot, but things have been
	decidedly in Indiana's favor since Knight's arrival.

	Minny in the spring sounds real nice.  The next two games (at Michigan
	State and at Illinois) should go a long way towards show just
	how good a shot the Hoosiers have at making it there.

tom
15.653CTHQ2::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsFri Jan 31 1992 12:3315
    Thanks guys,
    Actually I should have made it clear that I was lookin' at the
    Knight era. But dat shows ya that my BBall knowledge pales nexted
    to y'all.
    
    BTW Mikey,
    I did some research on the LSU-UK matchup and I'll acceed to yo'
    superior BBall knowledge. I was ROPED in by the 'CAT. 
    I'll flip-flop. UK should win. That's what I git for my 
    tongue in cheek analysis.
    
    
    MikeL
    
    
15.654and college cheeleaders are all pure of heart ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSWilt,Dean,Clyde,BigBadJohnFri Jan 31 1992 12:3912
 I wouldn't claim I have superior bball knowledge just that I watch as many
 college basketball games as I can. 

 Heck the other night the Celtics were in a tough struggle with the the Bullets
 and IU was blowing Purdue off the court and I still spent more time watching
 the IU game.

 The beauty of the college game is that they do not allowing traveling, palming
 etc. and it's a real team game where a coaches stratgies make a difference.
 NBA is more of a one on one league where the pecking order decides who gets
 away with what...
15.655DYPSS1::ROPERWILDCATS of 1992 &gt; 1975 hoosiersFri Jan 31 1992 12:4113
    MikeL, color me confused and dissapointed!  I'd never try anything so
    underhanded that would even remotely associate me with the actions of
    IU faithful.
    
    After lunch I'll post the starting lineups of UK and LSU over in 207. 
    Let the noters decide then who has the most talented squad.  Heck, I
    don't even need to do it (but I will), when you've got O'Neal vs. 6-7
    people it's no contest.
    
    There is absolutely no way UK can stop this Man-Child from wrecking
    havoc on this once proud, tradition filled, basketball program.
    
    WILDCAT
15.6568^)CTHQ2::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsFri Jan 31 1992 13:0815
    
>>  There is absolutely no way UK can stop this Man-Child from wrecking
>>  havoc on this once proud, tradition filled, basketball program.
    
>>  WILDCAT
    
Sigh... imitating the literary style of another. Don't tell me 'CAT that
    you're about to go work fer a small software company, too.
    
    
    Color me confused and disappointed also,
    
    MikeL
    
15.657There's no place like home, there's ...DYPSS1::ROPERWILDCATS of 1992 &gt; 1975 hoosiersFri Jan 31 1992 14:1115
    MikeL, I just decided to try something a bit new.  MrT and his merry
    band of IU sheep (excluding the totally objective Mr. Simpson of
    course) seem extremely content in living in a FANTASY world.  
    
    I've tried it for a couple of days this week, and it works
    great.  It goes something like this.  I deliberately bash and demean UK
    and it chances then when they win, I look like a hero.  I mean the
    congratulatory mail messages I received this week after the Ole Miss
    upset were incredible!
    
    Alas, you and Mr. Childs have snapped me back to reality.  However,
    this current group of Wildcats IMO could compete nicely with the 1975
    indiana hoosiers :-)
    
    WILDCAT
15.658Good work 'CAT, 8^)CTHQ2::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsFri Jan 31 1992 14:291
    
15.659ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Jan 31 1992 15:4330
    Shaddap Mildcat.  You tacitly conceded that I went on record months
    ago that this IU squad is more talented than any in years but suffers
    from too many guards too small a front-line and no front-line depth
    and no true center.  But, unlike all IU teams since '81, this squad
    has oodles a speed, quickness, and athletic ability.  
    
    re: Childs
    
    You're so right.  That's why I cain't watch the NBA.  I mean, here's
    a sport where they're seriously talking about raising the basket to
    increase the level of difficulty yet they won't enforce the rules that
    are there to give the game its "basketballness" in the first place.
    
    Last year Len Elmore was the color main for the T-Wolves.  After a
    player galloped for about 4 steps, palming the ball, hooking his
    defender trying to work his way around teammates who'd been standing 
    in the lane for about 20 seconds, as he chucked up a shot he was 
    intentionally fouled and the ref blew the whistle but he continued to 
    go for the hoop travelling a 2nd time and got the continuation...
    
    ... and Len started saying that the integrity of the game was being
    threatened by constant travelling/palming/camping/pushing/holding etc.
    and that if they called the NBA the way they do college "spectacular"
    plays would be truly so and also much less frequent but the overall
    game would be much more enjoyable to watch ESPECIALLY IF THEY WENT
    TO A 45 SECOND CLOCK SO SOME STRATEGY COULD BE USED.
    
    Len don't announce for the T-Wolves no more.
    
    MrT
15.660The NBA could be sooooooooooo much better ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 31 1992 16:3811
    re: NBA
    
    Good point, MorT.  Also consider the fack that (as BobHunt recently
    reported) a certain rookie for the Hornets got whistled for a crucial
    end-game foul, only to be told later by the refs that, in due time,
    he'll start getting those kinds of calls.
    
    Yuk.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.661ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Jan 31 1992 17:116
    Agreed.  College refs cain be bad (especially Big10 refs) but they
    call 'em as they see 'em and don't give a rat's ass if it's a 
    Jimmy Jackson or Christian Laettner that gets fouled out, they see
    the foul they make the call.
    
    MrT
15.662Julie, see the guy w/the red sweater? He's > Dean... IMBACQ::SZABONumbers 7 &amp; 8 RULES !Fri Jan 31 1992 17:4722
    I've mostly next-unseened this note lately, but the last few replies
    about NBA "fantasketball" vs. College basketball_the_way_it_should_be_
    played strikes an increasing sore spot with me.  I see more and more
    pre-high schoolers, including my daughter (who's shaping up to be a
    fine athlete), picking up the bad habits that make fantasketball what
    it is.  Why?  That's what these kids watch.  They don't know that 4
    steps on a lay-up is travelling.  They don't know what palming the ball
    is.  They don't get any basic fundamentals from watching fantasketball. 
    But, they do know the triple-axle through the legs twice upside down
    slam dunk real good!
    
    Trying to break my daughter's bad habit of palming/carrying the ball
    (all kids seem to be doing this, btw), I realized that she needs to
    watch less fantasketball and more college ball, that's why I've been
    turning her on to ESPN at night, instead of TBS and SportsChannel. 
    Kind of an absurd thought (like ACC Chris' poll) but, I wish they'd
    make NBA games R-rated, so that kids under 17 couldn't see them, or
    else simply cut out all of the "censored" parts, but then they'd have
    trouble filling-up a half hour with quality basketball...
    
    Hawk
    
15.663CNTROL::CHILDSWilt,Dean,Clyde,BigBadJohnFri Jan 31 1992 17:4811
 Refs can be bad or good at all levels T, but I'd take the Big Ten refs over
 the Big East's anyday. Like you said they call them as they see em' but they
 also allow the game to have some flow to it. In the Big East it's just one
 whistle after the other. 

 Gotta be the 6-foul limit. It turns people like  John H. right off and it's
 starting to get to me too. When a college game takes 2 1/2 hour without any
 overtime that's bad. 

 mike
15.664FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Jan 31 1992 18:0810
    It's not just the 6-foul limit that makes the last 5 minutes last
    forever.  It's the timeouts after missed baskets and the constant,
    constant fouling.  This problem doesn't seem to be as bad in the NBA. 
    I don't know what to do about it for college ball.
    
    The problem also seems to be the worst in the Big East for some reason. 
    Don't know why.  I do agree that the college game is purer than the
    NBA, FWIW.
    
    John
15.665I personally wouldn't send *my* daughter, mind you ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Jan 31 1992 18:179
    Easy problem to solve Hawk:	Send your daughter to one of them summer
    				BobCamp's that Knight runs.
    
    She'll learn fundamentals that will carry her through any amount of NBA
    action she might be forced to watch, although I cain't vouch for her
    mental condition when she finishes. 
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.666CAMONE::WAYCuimhnich, 13 February 1692Fri Jan 31 1992 18:3420
>    Easy problem to solve Hawk:	Send your daughter to one of them summer
>    				BobCamp's that Knight runs.
>    
>    She'll learn fundamentals that will carry her through any amount of NBA
>    action she might be forced to watch, although I cain't vouch for her
>    mental condition when she finishes. 
    

I had a French teacher in Freshman year that I HATED.  In fact, 
every student that ever had her HATED her.  Nobody got better than
a C.  Nobody.

But, the next year, all of her students were the best in Sophomore
French and we really began to appreciate her.


Bob Knight is a leader in the finest tradition...


'Saw
15.667Wanted: Slow 7-footer with bad hairCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsSun Feb 02 1992 19:4131
	
	Bad weekend for IU and it's fans.

	On Saturday, Michigan State completely dominated the Hoosiers from
start to finish.  Bailey and Cheaney started the game a combined 0-9 from the
field; Cheaney recovered to finish with 17 for the game (on 7-18 shooting), but
Bailey ended up with 0 points and 4 fouls.  Greg Graham again led Indiana, this
time with 23.  Knight may HAVE to put him in the starting lineup soon.  

	The most worrisome thing for the Hoosiers, and the reason IU fans aren't
convinced about this team, is that the inside problems surfaced again in a big
way.  Indiana was completely incapable of handling MSUs front-line players 
(Peplowski, Miller, Stephens, etc.) on either end of the floor.  There was no
inside scoring for the Hoosiers, little rebounding (final margin for MSU was
something like +16), and little interior defense.  For the game, there were
26 rebounds off MSU missed shots; Indiana grabbed 12 and the Spartans grabbed
14.  Any team that gives up more offensive boards than it gets in defensive
boards is going to lose big-time, and that's what happened.  With a break or
two in the brackets this might be a Final Four team, but I don't see a
championship anywhere on the horizon.

	Then, on Sunday, Ohio State grabbed control of the conference race with
a convincing win over Michigan.  OSU, even though they've had some problems
recently, seems to me to be getting better and better.  They're learning how to
use and not use Robinson and they're starting to get good contributions from
several front-line players off the bench.  Michigan, on the other hand, 
continues to be a team that only plays about 10-15 minutes every game.  Wonder
if Fisher wishes he'd only gotten about 3 of the "Fab Five"?  Sure would have
made his job a lot easier.

tom
15.6687 footer with bad hair? Uwe Flop again?!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPatrick Buchanan for UXSun Feb 02 1992 22:2050
    You summed it up.  Not only are the Hoosiers weak across the front
    line and without a true center, they have no depth up front.  They
    were completely dominated underneath.  I don't remember a single 
    offensive rebound by the Hoosiers.  The front-line shot a collective
    15-39 from the field.
    
    I was unhappy that they didn't slice the zone with guard-drives and
    dishes, but Damon got inside a few times early and, as is his habit,
    either got the ball jammed back in his face or struggled just to
    maintain possession.  So maybe they decided to just try and shoot over
    the zone.
    
    GGraham has been their best player this season.  It's hard to believe
    that this former bricklayer was their only effective jump shooter
    yesterday.  
    
    The only silver lining is that the Hoosiers got a lot of open shots
    with their offense,  they just couldn't hit anything.  Wide open 5
    footers, 10 footers, 18 footers, didn't matter, they all seemed to hit
    the back of the rim.  If they had shot around 50% it woulda been a game
    even despite the utter domination by the Spartan big men... but they
    shot 29% from the floor.
    
    I watched this game with a college buddy, and he maintained that they
    still could make the Final Four.  I don't think so, their record
    against top level teams is not all that impressive (4-3 by my count),
    and they have 7 relatively tough road games left.
    
    The State game thoroughly exposed their two major weaknesses: Spotty
    shooting and a front-line that's thin and prone to intimidatin by big
    quick players, just as it was by Kaintucky and UCLA.  IU is slated to
    see several such lineups down the stretch: Iowa (twice), State again,
    and visits to Ohio State and Michigan.
    
    They need to perfect what they showed against Michigan: relentless
    defensive pressure, near perfect execution all around, and a lot of 
    guard penetration resulting in either baskets or foul shots.
    
    It's bad luck to play a road game after your host has suffered a bitter
    loss.  State had just lost at home to the Fab5; the Illini will be mad
    as hornets about giving the Mildcats their first conference win in
    nearly two years.
    
    I sure would like to see Eric Anderson assert himself.  Young Alan
    Henderson can only do so much up front.
    
    Meanwhile, if State could only find some consistency with a little luck
    they could end up making a run at a 2nd Big10 Title in 3 years.
    
    MrT
15.669BUT, but, they are as good as the 1975 team!!DYPSS1::ROPERWILDCATS of 1992 &gt; 1975 hoosiersMon Feb 03 1992 13:0517
    re 15.632:
    
    >>    This Bob-squad is, IMNSHO, executing the Bob-system at the highest
    >>    level, right now at least, ball handling, picking, weaving,
    >>    defending, passing, shot selecting, lane filling, and 
    >>    everything else since the 75-76 squad.
    
    HAHAHAHAHA!  Looks to me like they need to work a little on ball
    handling, picking, weaving, defending, passing, shot selectin, lane
    filling, and everything else since 1975-1976!!!
    
    MrT, if this is executing the Bob-system at the highest level, then
    they are in serious trouble!!!
    
    Great analysis 'T :-)
    
    WILDCAT
15.670ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPatrick Buchanan for UXMon Feb 03 1992 13:2925
    Nobody ever said "they are as good as the 1975 team."  I said that 
    they'd been executing as near flawlessly as seen since that team,
    which was not to say that that would continue, especially in light
    of the fack they hadn't played a tough road game in the conference
    yet, and that they are seriously flawed - as has been observed by
    Billy Packer and others.
    
    My preseason prediction is looking fairly good, although I hope I'm
    proved wrong.  Ohio State should take first place which I got, I was
    wrong on which Michigan would vie for second place, and Indiana may
    indeed finish third unless either Henderson or Anderson really kicks it
    in on the inside play as far as defense, rebounding, and close-in
    shots.
    
    So while you fallaciously contend that I was wrong about something I'm
    looking righter and righter with each passing week.
    
    Unlike the '76 and '81 teams, this squad MUST play near perfect ball to
    compete at the highest level.  They're more like the '87 team, and may
    have more overall talent than that team while still being weaker: i.e.,
    the '87 team could shoot all day from outside, had a long-armed 6-11 
    center who blocked shots and hit the boards (but could do little else),
    and had two or more players for each of the five roles.
    
    MrT
15.6711992 hooisers >= 1987 hooisersDYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Mon Feb 03 1992 14:408
    Let's see if I follow.  Before debacle against MSU, IU was >= the 1975
    team.  After the *POOR* performance this weekend they are >= 1987 team! 
    Gotcha!
    
    You're getting righter and righter?   NOT!  How about you're getting
    more SUBJECTIVE and doing more back peddling each successive week!
    
    WILDCAT
15.672Great call Chris!RAVEN1::TURNERA'64ToplessTripower4-SpeedGTOtogo!Mon Feb 03 1992 14:429
    I understand now....
    
       They could be like the '76 team, then again they may be like the 
       '87 team, but with out a doubt they're an exact replica of the '81 
       team, on the otherhand..... and maybe.....
    
               and they may or may not win their next game.....
    
       Come on Chris, Quit fooling around on Mr. T's terminal!
15.673ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPatrick Buchanan for UXMon Feb 03 1992 15:2235
    You geeks are real geniuses, huh?
    
    There are two elements in any athletic team's chances for success:
    
    1) Talent, of two kinds:
    
       a) overall talent 
    
       b) talent for specific roles
    
    2) Level of execution
    
    This year's Hoosiers have more of 1.a than in quite a while, but even
    for a team whose played more out of position players than any other
    college hoops program, they're weaker in category 1.b than they've been 
    in memory, having tried three forwards at center and two guards at forward
    and on a lineup filled with guards have the worst outside shooters in
    the conference except for maybe Minnesota.
    
    Level of execution changes through time.  IU's was very bad early in
    the year but the UCLAn nuclearwidebodystuds served as a loud wakeup 
    call and they stepped up their level of execution to the highest level,
    so overall this year in category 2 they get an A minus.
    
    Trouble is, they must execute perfectly to compete at the highest level. 
    They've been blown out by UCLA and Michigan State, and had to work hard
    to avert being blown out by Kentucky who led the entire game.
    
    No rebounding, no inside defense, no inside offense, shaky outside
    shooting.  No true center, no quality front-line substitute.
    
    If that's the third best team in the country I'm the Dalai Lama.
    
    MrT
    
15.674Is "Air Knight" next ???SHALOT::HUNTIs that a great new Pepsi can or what?Mon Feb 03 1992 15:3012
 The Hoosiers will go far in March.   Knight looks as contented with his
 team as he has in a long, long time.   That's always a telling sign with
 him.   He's been filling in their talent gaps for years and this year is
 no exception.
 
 On a more serious note ... Did I see "The General" doing a Domino's
 commercial ???   On the ACC network, no less.   What is this world coming
 to ???   All my faith in Robert Montgomery Knight went out the window as
 he lifted the gooey slice to his mouth, chomped down and then smiled for
 the camera.  Tsk, tsk, tsk ...
 
 Bob Hunt
15.675CNTROL::CHILDSParty at Ground ZeroMon Feb 03 1992 15:428
 Yeah I was taken back too Bob. First the quick blurp and I says to meself
 is that Knight? Sure enough he comes back and it is. Could be he's donating
 his money to charities. Could be pocketing the money too. Wouldn't blame
 him if he was.....

 mike

15.676Dean == Bob? RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Feb 03 1992 15:4828
    > Did I see "The General" doing a Domino's commerical??? 
    
    Oh yes, you saw it all right.  And saw it.  And saw it.  And saw it! 
    They must've run that spot *AT LEAST* 20 times.  I've seen Bob's mug
    now enough times to last me a lifetime ...
    
    re: IU needs a 7-footer wif a bad haircut
    
    Despite DougRoss' relentless pestering, "Doctor Double Zero" as he's
    now called by his teammates is probably exactly what the Hoosiers could
    use.  He's big.  He rebounds.  And he's really developing some nice
    moves around the bucket.  For better or worse though, he's actually
    competing for playing time with fellow center Kevin Salvadori, who's
    currently leading the ACC in blocked shots!  Sadly they're both too
    slow to play on the floor at the same time against any team with
    reasonable quickness.  Happily they're both proving why big men go to
    learn the game from Dean.  They've both improved *significantly*,
    although they're still woefully inconsistent.
    
    re: BobKnight
    
    Okay folks, listen up.  I've read some disturbing news in my latest
    Carolina Blue that is gonna force me to eat some *major* crow on the
    Bob vs. Dean debate.  Stay tuned for details, but suffice to say "The
    Great Debate" may at long last be coming to an end.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.677CNTROL::CHILDSParty at Ground ZeroMon Feb 03 1992 15:5313
    
>    re: BobKnight
    
>    Okay folks, listen up.  I've read some disturbing news in my latest
>    Carolina Blue that is gonna force me to eat some *major* crow on the
>    Bob vs. Dean debate.  Stay tuned for details, but suffice to say "The
>    Great Debate" may at long last be coming to an end.
    
    
  What debate? It's a world wide (minus 1) aknowledge fact that Bob is
  the greater of the two...

 a more worthwile debate that you just might win is Dean vs. Thompson....
15.678Guess what just froze over!!!!!!! ;^)CST17::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Mon Feb 03 1992 16:021
    
15.679ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPat Buchanan for U.S. PresidentMon Feb 03 1992 17:357
    >but suffice to say "The Great Debate" may at long last be coming to
    >an end.
    
    Given all the accounts that've been balanced over the last week or
    so even this extremely unlikely event wouldn't totally shock me.
    
    MrT
15.680ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPat Buchanan for U.S. PresidentMon Feb 03 1992 17:376
    False alarm.  I went back for a second gander and saw the title which
    read "Dean == Bob?"
    
    You're looking for a draw, and hell hasn't yet frozen over buddy.
     
    MrT
15.68110 left, and they need 8 (at least)CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Feb 05 1992 01:3813
	Solid but unspectacular win tonight for the Hoosiers over a bad
Illinois squad.  Greg Graham again played well off the bench, and Cheaney's
finally starting to look like an All-American (21 pts., 8 rebs., 3 steals).
Henderson looked good in limited action, and Matt Nover completely controlled
an un-inspired Deon Thomas.  Down-side:  Bailey's once again struggling, and 
this game's poor shooting performance will cause Anderson's 43% field-goal 
shooting to drop a bit lower.  He's slowly but surely becoming invisible.

	Next up:  Iowa on Sunday in Bloomington.  Wish the Hawkeyes still
played that 40-minute-all-out-in-your-face-while-you-run-by-me press.

tom
15.682False AdvertisingANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPat Buchanan for U.S. PresidentWed Feb 05 1992 13:5828
    Again I agree, Tom.  The good news is that Calbert hit the boards with
    some gusto last night, the bad news is that he was finally doing it 
    against someone his own size (and with less ability).
    
    The Hoosiers shot something like 25-54 from the field, and that equates
    into a ace kicking if they're at Ohio State or Iowa or somesuch.
    
    Damon is fading.  He needs to find his shot.  To his credit he did just
    that during the two stretches when his mates needed it most.  
    
    One wonders why he insists on driving to the hoop.  Yes, he has fine
    court sense and is a very good dribbler and cain do a good job getting
    inside; but when he gets there he usually gets bitch-slapped with
    leather to the face, or sometimes simply has it stolen or a jump ball.
    
    Yeah yeah it's true that he's one a the most talented hoops players in
    history (on par with Lew Alcindor and Moses Malone coming out a H.S.),
    and yeah it's true he cain leap 36", but for some unknown reason Damon
    has settled on jumping only about 12-16" off the floor [myjohnson], 
    usually a slow release jump and not a quick jump, and is overpowered 
    defensively.
    
    Given that we all know that he cain jump 3 feet from the floor, why 
    doesn't Damon just sky over everybody and slamjamthankUmam?  
    
    Dunno.
    
    MrT 
15.683AXIS::ROBICHAUD1960-69Celtics &gt; 1960-69LakersWed Feb 05 1992 15:154
    	What's with those Hoosier warmup pants?  Do they moonlight as
    candy stripers or is there a barber shop quartet on campus?
    
    				/Don
15.684DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 05 1992 17:498
    MrT, you answered your own question.  The reason Damon doesn't fly to
    the hoop ala Rex Chapman (who some moron compared him to in High
    School) is because he was indeed a case of "FALSE ADVERTISING".
    
    Don't get me wrong, Bailey is a *good* ball player, just not the
    "SUPER STUD" Bob Knight and John Feinstein would've had us to believe.
    
    WILDCAT
15.685ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Feb 05 1992 18:369
    I agree.  In fack, I never heard the Chapman comparison, but when
    all the talk about how good Damon was got out I immediately envisioned
    him to be a Rex-type player: 6-5, stringy but strong, quick, high-
    jumping... very athletic.
    
    His potential is more in the Scott Skiles mode, which he might still
    attain and ain't all that bad either.
    
    MrT
15.686Another possible explanation ...CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RWed Feb 05 1992 18:5013
>    Given that we all know that he cain jump 3 feet from the floor, why 
>    doesn't Damon just sky over everybody and slamjamthankUmam?  
    
>    Dunno.
    
>    MrT 



     It could be, as was mentioned, false advertising.

     But it could also be that he is being shackled by a coach who prefers
     a more conservative style of play.  Such things have been known to happen.
15.687Ain't been that way for yearsCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Feb 05 1992 23:1913
>     It could be, as was mentioned, false advertising.

>     But it could also be that he is being shackled by a coach who prefers
>     a more conservative style of play.  Such things have been known to happen.


	Of course, anyone who'd actually WATCHED INDIANA PLAY over the last
several years would know that's not the case.

	HTH.

tom
15.688ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Feb 06 1992 13:0823
    Damon suffering from Bob's team-style?  This threadbare canard 
    has been trotted out before with no success.  Bob has proven
    over the years that he's highly flexible with the type of talent
    he's working with.  Who cain forget the NCAA tourney matchup 
    against the Runnin' Rabble when the bookies said the Hoosiers had
    no chance against UNLV's speed.  So the Hoosiers come out running
    and beat a more talented team.  Or when the skeptics said that 
    Isiah would be stifled in Bob's system.  Instead Isiah had a green
    light to penetrate with the ball, crash the boards, or, within 
    limits, work one-on-one situations - all of which he did on yet
    another Title team.
    
    The list goes on.  Damon has a green light to drive the lane.  It's
    hurt against teams with big quick front-lines, but Bob lets him 
    persist on the bet that he'll develop the ability to present enough
    of a credible inside scoring threat to either draw defenders and
    dish assists, pick up fouls, or actually score.
    
    I cain't think of anything that Damon's not being allowed to do.  In
    fack, nobody has a red light on this team right now, even the awful
    Matt Nover and the no-shot Chris Reynolds are chucking it up.
    
    MrT
15.689ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Feb 06 1992 16:0728
    Indiana 	7 - 1
    Ohio State  7 - 1
    State	4 - 3
    Iowa	4 - 3
    Minnesota   5 - 4
    Michigan	4 - 4
    Purdue	4 - 4
    Wisconsin	2 - 6
    Nrthwstn.   1 - 7
    
    Whoda thunk that Mene Gene would have his squad tied with the Fab5
    or 5 Xs or whatever they're called ... The conference makes the turn
    into the 2nd half of the double round-robin after this weekend ...
    Indiana faces a road schedule that'll make it nearly impossible for
    them to win the Title: Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio State, Purdue, Iowa
    ... the Hoosiers probably need to win four of these to tie Ohio State,
    or win three and win at Ohio State ... the Fab5 or 5 Xs have the opposite,
    a young team with not too many tough road games left (go Steve, ruin this 
    team !!) ... State has been very inconsistent, if they fix that they
    might vie for 2nd or even possibly the Title ... Minnesota looks to
    fade ... I was wrong about Illinois, Purdue will be the surprise team
    ... Tracy Webster, UW is awesome, he replaces Respert on my all-frosh 
    squad at PG ... best centers: Acie, Pep, then Chris ...
    
    Big10 Tom 
    
     
      
15.690ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Feb 06 1992 16:1211
    >or win three and win at Ohio State
    
    Correction: win two and win at Ohio State... 8^o
    
    All Big10 so far:	F - Calbert
			F - JJ (plays SF a lot)
    			C - Acie
    			G - Tracy
    			G - Jalen
    
    MrT 
15.691ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Fri Feb 07 1992 13:3217
    So Acie has a relatively bad game going up against his competition
    for the best Big10 center in Peplowski and the Hawkeyes still beat
    up on the visiting Spartans.
    
    I'm glad they won, though.  I'd a hate to have had the Hoosiers 
    going into Carver-Hawkeye with the Yellow & Black smarting from a
    home loss.
    
    This weekend's matchup will be quite interesting in terms of testing
    how well Indiana's front-line cain do against an Acie Earl and a 
    pretty fair complement of big guys.  I see this game as a defining
    moment as to whether the Hoosiers cain make a run against the Buckeyes
    for the Big10 Title.
    
    Isn't it nice to have a real conference Title?  I think so.
    
    MrT
15.692ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Mon Feb 10 1992 14:0725
    3 scheduling factors weigh upon the Hoosiers going into the 2nd
    half of the 18 game double round-robin:
    
    1) You either play 4 road games one half, 5 the other.  Indiana
       faces their 5 road game half.
    
    2) You play 9 road games.  Indiana's 4 road games thus far include
       3 against the conference's 3 cupcakes (UN, UW, Illinois) and only
       1 against a toughie (MSU).  Their 5 remaining road games are all
       against toughies: Minnesota, Michigan, Ohio State, Purdue, Iowa.
    
    3) They're tied with Ohio State; but OSU has been beaten only by 
       their competition, Indiana; and Indiana must play in Columbus.
    
    Bottom line, some combination of OSU losses and Indiana road wins
    must compile to keep the Hoosiers in contention for the Title.  
    
    Indiana cain be master of its own destiny by beating the Buckeyes
    in that snakepit St. John Arena and going at least 3-1 at Williams
    (another snakepit), Crisler, Mackey (yet another snakepit), and
    Carver-Hawkeye.
    
    A tall order for a not-so-tall team.
    
    MrT
15.693Michigan beats 'em in b-ball, too!BSS::JCOTANCHMon Feb 10 1992 14:2513
    Finally got to watch the Fab 5 for a bit yesterday, and man, are they
    fun to watch!  Webber put on a show - that one-handed-alley-oop slam
    early on was spectacular.  And late in the game King made a Jordan-type
    move under the basket for a layup.  The Fab 5 scored all of Michigan's 
    points. 
    
    The young Michigan squad showed some good character yesterday by
    holding on on the road after blowing a big lead - the Irish managed to
    get within 4 once.
    
    
    Joe
    
15.694ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJohn (Big Bad John)Mon Feb 10 1992 14:5936
    As the Wolverines mature they become the conferences wild card
    during the second half.
    
    As for Indiana's performance yesterday;
    
    * They totally dominated at the guard position.
    
    * Calbert Cheaney's playing a great floor game.  It's hard to believe
      this is the same guy who's been pushed around for the boards and
      on D by UCLA, Kaintuck and State.
    
    * Eric Anderson had a great game yesterday.  True, he didn't shoot well
      but who does going up against Acie?  He blocked shots and grabbed
      boards and played like the big main force IU so sorely lacks.
    
    * Matt Nover ain't half bad.  He's progressed, having learned how to 
      contribute despite hit limited abilities without detracting (too
      much).
    
    * If Damon Bailey cain shoot with the authority he did yesterday the
      other major deficiency of the Hoosiers disappears and makes them 
      dangerous in the tourney.
    
    * Iowa has a lotta front-line talent.  Acie is a future NBA center.
      Street is a player.  Winters is a explosive widebody.  Yesterday's
      game is a good chart of how Indiana must play in order to win against
      the widebody squads both in the 2nd half and the tourney.
    
    Now we get to see how they'll do on the road.  The history has been
    disturbing for this squad, mainhandled by State, and by UCLA (and to
    some degree Kaintuck) on neutral courts (the UK game was in Indy).
    
    Indiana is still questionable cuz the great squads don't get blown out,
    they lose in close ones when they do lose.  We'll see.
       
    MrT
15.6959 down, 9 to goCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Feb 10 1992 21:5914
	Most amazing statistic from Sunday's Indiana game:

		Cheaney had 13 rebounds!!!!

	This is a guy that's been known to go an entire game without
	grabbing a boardHe's definitely picked his game up a notch
	over the last month.  Now, if he could just remember where
	he left his jump shot...

	Next up:  Wednesday in Williams Arena.  Hope the Gophs don't
	remember that 46 point loss last month in Bloomington.

tom
15.696CNTROL::CHILDSRodney Dangerfields&gt;The Dream TeamTue Feb 11 1992 12:248
 I agree Tom, I was amazed at Calbert's board work last sunday. As T also 
 touched on Anderson played with fire for a change. Matt Nover has come a
 long way. Didn't see to much of Alan Henderson. perhaps he's slacking off
 in practice? Meeks has got to pop that shot more often. He so wide open
 it's sin....

 mike
15.697colorsANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPynchon,Rushdie,Berger,IrvingTue Feb 11 1992 17:584
    The Hoosiers visit the old barn tomorrow night in Minneapolis.  MrT
    will be there in red and white.
    
    MrT
15.698AXIS::ROBICHAUDIWantMySISwimsuitIssue!Tue Feb 11 1992 18:014
    	Hey MorT, is the game on ESPN?  If so why don't you bring a
    "Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" sign so we'll know it's you.
    
    				/Don
15.699What do BobKnight and Vanna White have in common? Both on @ 7:30RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Feb 11 1992 18:5911
    re: .-1  ("Is the game on ESPN?")
    
    If it's Tuesday night then Indiana is on.  I believe this will be the
    *FOURTH* straight week that Hucksters (tm) have been on Tuesday night,
    which is a tribute to the political muscle Bob has.  Ever since his
    moaning-and-groaning about the late night TV games (FWIW I think his
    point is extremely valid) the Hoosiers have been almost as as much a 
    fixture at the 7:30 slot as Vanna White and Wheel-of-Fortune!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.700CNTROL::CHILDSRodney Dangerfields&gt;The Dream TeamTue Feb 11 1992 19:056
 which is fine with me. I love to watch a well coached team excute. 

 and no UNC doesn't qualify...too much moaning and bitching for calls...

 mike
15.701JENEVR::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Feb 11 1992 19:226
    >  which is fine with me. I love to watch a well coached team excute
    
    I much prefer it when Indiana is executed.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.702CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsTue Feb 11 1992 20:1110
    Wearin' red'n'white T??
    We didn't know ya owned BK undies.
    Now try and get that by the ESPN censors.
    
    MikeL
    P.S.
    Make up a sign " /Don is guilty"
    8^)
    
    
15.703CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsTue Feb 11 1992 20:5513
	This one's a Wednesday night game, but Indiana was already on 
ESPN four straight times --- against Ohio St., Michigan, Purdue, and
Illinois.  As I mentioned at the time, Big 10 coaches started calling
it "Bob Knight Tuesday on ESPN".  And I loved it.  Had to help recruiting.

	The only thing I've heard about Henderson is that he's still a 
little weak from that bout with the flu several weeks ago.  Seems like a long
recovery, but I guess a 6-9 guy who drops from 202 to 192 is going to be 
weak for a while  

tom    

15.704CNTROL::CHILDSRodney Dangerfields&gt;The Dream TeamWed Feb 12 1992 12:2116
 I was a bit surprised last night that Keady didn't blow his cork, with the
 way his team blew the game last night. Usually the jacket's up in the third
 row over those kind of losses.

 Also IMHO JJ is the player of the year in college. Watching Shack last night
 and saturday have left me convinced. 

 Anyone who caught Bill Walton's comments on Close-Up with Firestone about
 Shack would be hard pressed to argue with him.

 Shack had best better stay in school and learn how to shoot those free throws.
 He was better last year. Speaks volumes for the lack of coaching Dale Brown
 does...

 mike
15.705ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPynchon,Rushdie,Berger,IrvingWed Feb 12 1992 13:5120
    I haven't seen anyone play as well as JJ.  Laettner is awfully good,
    but sometimes suffers from the collapse defenses.  JJ does it all.
    All the hype about Shaq has more to do with his NBA potential than 
    what he's doing right now.  
    
    The best college center ever should stand as the paradigm for the true
    superstar college middlemain.  That was, of course, the big redhaid,
    Bill Walton.
    
    I cain't put Shaq on the same level with Walton the way he's playing
    right now.  Walton solved the collapse Ds with pinpoint passing, and
    by developing a menu of inside shots (the jump hook, the fade-J, the
    finger roll)... where is this menu from Shaq?
    
    Shaq is being praised for his considerable potential, not for his
    current level of play.  If you wanna see a C who cain fill it up and
    block shots and change shots and move wihtout the ball and pass watch
    Iowa's Acie Earl.  
    
    MrT
15.70630311::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Feb 12 1992 18:524
       Well we finally agree on something T. Walton is without a doubt the
    best COLLEGE center ever. No question. I'd say if anyone disagrees they
    prob'ly never saw him play.
                                         Denny
15.707DUGROS::ROSSRally roolz!Wed Feb 12 1992 19:539
    Purdue looked terrible against Illinois last night... losing in OT
    76-71.    They had the game in the bag, but could not deny Deion
    Thomas the ball down the stretch.  No excuse for such shoddy defense
    against Illinois' only good player.
    
    The Boilers are bad and getting worse.  Time for Mean Gene to
    take one of those  job offers he gets every year to go out west.
    
    
15.708It's still the same old story...CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsThu Feb 13 1992 01:5820
	The fat lady may have sung earlier than usual in the Big Ten race.

	Indiana loses 71-67 at Minnesota, in a game that looked all to 
familiar to people who watch Indiana more than occasionally.  Outside shooting
was once again non-existent and Eric Anderson and Damon Bailey BOTH disappeared,
but rebounding (have I mentioned in here before that Indiana has this slight
rebounding problem?  I thought that I had) was again the difference.  Second
half rebounds were 17-5 Minnesota at one point, and for the game the Gophers
ended up with 19 (this is NOT a typo) offensive rebounds, the majority of 
which ended up in scores.  Minnesota played aggressively defensively, made both
open and tough shots, and generally outplayed Indiana more than the final score
indicated.  With all of that, the Hoosiers had the ball 2 points down with under
20 seconds left, and didn't get off a shot.

	Next up:  Northwestern at home on Saturday
		  Michigan State at home next Wednesday
		  Ohio State on the road on the 23rd

tom

15.709No ESPN!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Feb 13 1992 11:152
       How come the game wasn't on the BobTV lasted night?
                                             Denny
15.710ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant-Rex)Thu Feb 13 1992 12:2238
    Same-o same-o.  Even though anybody who knows the team would expect
    them to be outrebounded, they were unable to outplay Minnesota on D
      from the guard position.  The U is a fine scrappy defensive team, 
    but Indiana missed dozens of open jumpers.  While the surging GGraham
    and the resurgent shot well, the guards shot 6-18.
    
    Minnesota's big people (they have a huge center jokingly listed at 
    7-0 but who must be taller) gave Anderson and Henderson a lot of 
    trouble.  Indiana never got the running game going and with that big
    redhaid standing on the middle the  pick n' weave looked more like 
    the dodge n' stumble.
    
    No D on the ball, no running game, without these two things they're
    daid meat cuz on the road it's likely they'll shoot poorly and they
    never rebound well (ok, almost never).
    
    Indiana has played two non-cupcake Big10 road games and are 0-2.
    They have 4 remaining.  Indiana played 4 top level nonconference 
    games and went 2-2.
    
    Looks like my preseason predick was right on, except I didn't realize
    how front-loaded the Big10 schedule was with cupcake roadies.  They
    didn't play a tough host until the 9 game first round was nearly over
    and got beach-slapped at State.  Now this.
    
    The talk about Indiana being a lock for the #1 seed and the Final Four
    should end now.  The Hoosiers must solve some problems and                   
    be able to consistently mask their obvious front-line deficiencies.
    This will make them a fun team to watch.  Not great, but potentially
    trouble for anybody if they play virtuoso team basketball, which
    they've shown themselves capable of doing.
    
    They're a longshot for the Final Four, but, like Villanova and some
    other teams, it cain be done.  They'll probably get worse before they
    get better.  We'll get a good idea of whether they have what it takes                  
    to make the Sweet16 when they visit St. John arena in two weeks.
    
    MrT
15.711Huh?????CST17::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Thu Feb 13 1992 12:3710
    MrT,
    
    Please clarify "St. John" arena.  According to my schedule, LOUIEEEE
    and the boys have only one out-of-conference game remaining - Notre
    Dame on Leap Years Day.
    
    tanks,
    
    Kev
    
15.712SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Feb 13 1992 12:433
       St John srena is Ohio State's gym.                       
                                         HTH,
                                         Denny
15.713AXIS::ROBICHAUDIWantMySISwimsuitIssue!Thu Feb 13 1992 12:581
    
15.714ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant-Rex)Thu Feb 13 1992 13:2923
    Not really.  They have a giant center who plays well at home but
    is a disappearing 7-2 redhaid on the road, and big guards.  Minny,
    who almost beat OSU in St. John Arena, is a deep scrappy squad who
    drags better teams down into a low percentage scratch match.  They
    win ugly, but at 3rd place in the league with their lack of experience
    Clem Haskins may be a shoo-in for Big10 CoY.
    
    Both IU and the The U are poor shooting teams.  The difference is that
    The U is a fairly good rebounding squad.  When they took a 17-4 edge
    in 2nd half boarding Indiana looked very frustrated, as if they knew
    they couldn't miss another shot and win.  
    
    On the bright side Calbert is playing a total game, moving without the
    ball on O and hustling on D like never before.  GGraham also played
    well and shot well.  The rest of the squad sucked.
    
    Eric Anderson cain't continue shooting 30% from the field.  Even if he
    resurges, to go to the Excellent8, or even the Sweet16, Indiana needs
    Alan Henderson (who looked skinnier than ever last nite, he must be 
    6-9 185 by now) to blossom and Matt Nover on the bench except to spell
    any tired front-liner.
    
    MrT
15.715Acie earl info wantedDEMING::MCKAYThu Feb 13 1992 15:007
    Could someone post Acie Earl's stats.  I've seen him play and
    while I agree with the shot blocked/altered part of his game,
    I haven't seen the offensive part of his game.  I thought he
    looked "awkward" on the offensive end.  He definitely has some good
    size to him especially his legs.
    
    Jimbo
15.716ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Thu Feb 13 1992 17:1312
    I'll post them if I ever see them.  Acie looks awkward, so awkward
    that I predicted he'd never amount to anything.  But Acie is one
    of the best O players in the conference now.  He finally caught
    on and moves relentless without the pill.  When he gets it inside
    he's very hard to stop, you basically just hope he misees his 
    fadeaway or travels going up for the lay-in.  I saw him in person
    against Duke at the Sweet16 and he played at par with Laettner.  Not
    saying he's as good overall as Christian, but he's very good in the
    paint and will play C in the NBA.  I think he's the Hawkeyes' leading
    scorer at around 20 ppg.
    
    MrT
15.717So thick you cain cut it ...SHALOT::HUNTIs that a great new Pepsi can or what?Thu Feb 13 1992 18:0810
 Ooooh, with this latest heart-breaking loss to the Golden Gophers, should
 we start "charting the ins and outs" of Bob's chances to go Dancing ???  
 
 Maybe it's time to start gnawing on our fingernails or staying up late at
 night praying to the Hoop Gods.   Will "The General" make it ???   What
 will happen if he doesn't ???   And what about Naomi ???
 
 Oh, this Big Ten suspense is just killing me.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.718CST17::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Thu Feb 13 1992 18:1114
    Bob,
    
    How's this??????
    
    
    
    
    
    Gong, Gong, Gong
    
    
    ;^) 
    Kev
    
15.719ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Thu Feb 13 1992 18:3310
    It's the boredom of the Almost Close conference season that's
    rotting your brain WitchHunt.  With the remaining schedule last
    night's loss purty much wraps things up for OSU.  Meanwhile, The
    U is slotted for a probable tourney bid.
    
    If this was Almost Close like you are Almost Close, last night's
    extravaganza woulda been a mere feeling-out probe experiment session
    for the Big Weekend Money-Grubathon.
    
    MrT
15.720Save me from this incredible tensionSHALOT::HUNTIs that a great new Pepsi can or what?Thu Feb 13 1992 19:1314
 Oh, that's right, I forgot ... In the Big Ten, we save our real worries
 and only do the "Ins And Outs Chart Dance" for the lower-middle tier.
 
 In the Big Ten, we just concede the title to Ohio State now on the 12th of
 February and then just play out the rest of the string waiting for the
 5:30pm Big Dance Bracket Show on the final Sunday of the regular season. 
 Wow.
 
 Will Purdue make it ???   (How 'bout Bill Cartwright ???) 
 
 And what about the Gophs ???   Oh, I cain't stand it any longer.   It's
 just too tense.  
 
 Bob Hunt
15.721DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Thu Feb 13 1992 19:3114
    I'm at a loss as to why this hasn't been asked by one of our esteemed
    noters earlier, but here goes.
    
    Can the Bob Knight *sheep* please explain how a team can lose a game to
    an opponent that they beat by 46 points earlier in the season?  I'm
    stunned, honestly.  Is this some sort of bizzare learning experiment
    that the "2nd Lt." is conducting?
    
    I just have a hard time figuring how a coach could allow a 50 point
    swing in a months time.
    
    Patiently waiting,
    
    WILDCAT
15.722ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Thu Feb 13 1992 19:3713
    E-Z: The Hoosiers shot the lights out a the hoop the first time
    around.  They had the same open mid-range jumpers last nite and
    could barely hit one.  Also, the game was in Williams Arena, a
    loud old barn and perhaps the best home advantage outside of
    Albequerque, they had the revenge factor to motivate them, and as
    the league's second youngest team have progressed markedly since
    IU spanked them in the opener.  
    
    Oh, they also had stuff bouncing on the rim three times and dropping
    through (fair n' square: shooter's touch) where in the first game 
    they missed several layups.
    
    MrT
15.723Ahhhh, revenge is SWEET!ANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Thu Feb 13 1992 21:0017
    MrT's really in a catch-22 here.  He doesn't want to make the Gophs
    sound too good.  On the other hand he cain't say too many bad things
    either, because he'd be doing FatBlob's underachiever's a wrong at the
    same time.
    
    Fact is, the 46 point loss in Bloomington was more like a 20-25 point
    loss.  Clem let it get out of hand to teach the kids a lesson that they
    haven't forgotten since.  (They've gone 7-3)  In the Big10 anyway it's 
    tough as hell to win on the road.  The Gophs beat NW here by 42, then win 
    there by 2.  Gophs are unbeaten at home and may well knock off all the 
    rest of the home wins against OSU, Iowa, Purdue and Wisconsin.
    
    BTW MrT, we're still waiting for the "spanking" your Loosiers were
    going to put on us.  :*)
    
    
    Spud
15.724WeaselGroupThink (tm) doesn't like these kinds of observations...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 14 1992 12:149
    re: .722
    
    How does this compare with my so_called "The other team was hot and we
    weren't" excuse?
    
    Just wonderin' ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.725ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Fri Feb 14 1992 15:0920
    re 2
    
    If you'll remember MrT boldly predicted that the Golden Goophs would
    make the tourney, and it looks like I'm gonna be right.
    
    >How does this...
    
    This?  You mean the hot shooting, which was only one small component
    of "this?"  Here's how I'll explain it: The hot shooting explained why
    a team lost one game.  We should all be cautionary about making the
    extremely misleading and just plain stupid logic leap that this is in
    any way equivalent or comparitive to "explaining" why a talent-laden
    squad beat 5 trillion to one odds by running into similar "hot shooting
    teams" over a 30 year period.
    
    Oh, I failed to mention one other disappointment in IU's performance
    at Williams: They played lousy defense from the guard position, which
    has been their most important asset as a team this year.
    
    MrT
15.726ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Tue Feb 18 1992 13:5214
    Bob has stated that he'll redshirt 7-0 Todd Lindeman next year.
    
    In comments made to a Minneapolis writer at dinner the night before
    their game at Williams, Bob said he expected a close game and said
    he worried that the Hoosiers "have major holes to exploit."  As it
    turned out those holes were gaping and fully exploited by the Goophs:
    they got dominated on the boards and had a awful outside shooting
    game.
    
    Bob commented in '87 to this same writer that he actually thought 
    that that team could win the Title if it played near perfectly, so
    it's not like Bob is a sandbagger.
    
    MrT 
15.72711 down, 7 to goCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsTue Feb 18 1992 15:0211
	Knight said after the Iowa game that Acie Earl was someone everybody
who played Iowa had to worry about, and that "we'll have someone like that in
a couple of years."  I assume he was talking about Lindemann, and I hope he's
right.

	Indiana just received a verbal commitment for a spring signing from
Malcolm Sims, 6-4 out of Shaker Heights, OH.  Guess you can never have too
many guards. :^)

tom
15.728CTHQ2::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsTue Feb 18 1992 15:186
    Dang Tom,
    If'n ya got a plethora of guards, how about shippin them north about
    a coupla hundred miles. We sure could use 'em!!
    
     MikeL
    
15.729AXIS::ROBICHAUDChicken McShaughnessy?Tue Feb 18 1992 15:216
15.730look like a obstacle courseCTHQ2::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsTue Feb 18 1992 15:356
    HAHAHA Slash,
    Any of our NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS@ are more like NUKEWIDEBODYSTATUES@
    
    HTH
    MikeL
    
15.731AXIS::ROBICHAUDChicken McShaughnessy?Tue Feb 18 1992 15:374
    	That's okay Mike, BobKnight will turn them into NBA first round
    draft picks, and win an NCAA title with them to boot!
    
    				/Don
15.732ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Tue Feb 18 1992 17:2534
    You're damn right, /Roacher - although I sense you might be curling
    your ever-flapping lip in sarcasm when you speak this truth.
    
    Another 6-4 guard?  That's two 6-4 guards for this year, and I
    assume there are no more slots open, maybe one, dunno, would like
    to find out.  
    
    I just wish Bob would do the BayWhine/Tark thing and unwittingly
    send one a his rich Indianapolis alums out to LA checkbook in hand
    and write that $100K check and get one a them 6-10 musculated 
    coordinated aircraft carriers.  Sure could use one a them.
    
    Maybe if they have another scholarship it's time to dip into the
    juco ranks for a big guy with good grades who could give them a
    extra big body to deal with.  
    
    Next year Eric's gone, Calbert's small but better, Alan should be
    better and hopefully heavier, 6-7 Brian Evans will debut... and
    that's it up front.  Unless you count Nover.
    
    re: OSU
    
    Randy Ayers announced that ThunderBurp will start in place of 7-footer
    Bill Robinson at C against Iowa.  Ayers has done a good job, teaching
    this haid case a lesson by using him as a substitute and bringing him
    to the fore just in time for Iowa and Indiana.  
    
    Tonight IU has State at home.  People are starting to whisper that
    State may be better than even OSU.  If the Hoosiers lose at home
    tonight they're in a dogfight for 2nd place and a #2 seed in the
    tourney - which could damage their chances for a meaningless end-of-
    season peak.
    
    MrT
15.733Can T stay honest ?LUNER::BROOKSYou down wit MSG ?Tue Feb 18 1992 18:005
    So T, are you saying that Ayers is doing a better job coaching the
    allegedly uncoachable Thunderburke than the sainted "tough lover"
    BobFright ?
    
    Doc
15.734Lousy, lousy source, dudeANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Tue Feb 18 1992 20:2410
    Re: .726  The Minneapolis "writer"
    
    You have to be referring to Sid "Bobby Knight Could Walk on Water if He
    wanted to" Hartmann.  What a joke.  Haven't you noticed that Sid has
    been absolutely wrong about everything he's said in the last year???
    
    Gawd, Sid would probably kiss FatBlob's feet if he was asked to...
    
    
    Spud
15.735ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Wed Feb 19 1992 14:0433
    Whaddya talking about.  Sid may have guessed wrong on who's gonna
    win or what trade's gonna be made, but he in fact broke the story
    that Lindemann's going to red-shirt.
    
    re 2
    
    I'm saying nothing of the sort.  ThunderBurp was rated among the
    top5 players in the nation as a HS junior.  He was such a flaming
    ani haid case his teammates went to the coach and they threw him
    off the team.  Burp has been involved with one problem after another
    and admitted it when he signed with Bob, stating that he needed the
    discipline in order to get straightened out.
    
    Tom Simpson and I both at the time predicted right here in this file
    he wouldn't be with the Hoosiers long.  He got his discipline.  Same
    deal.  Anus was flaming big-time, the players went to Knight and said
    if there was gonna be a different set of rules for him the team would
    fall apart and nobody could stand the guy.  They wanted him off the
    team.  So Burp "walked off."  
    
    Ayers (who was assisted by Bob in recruiting Burp) agreed totally that
    he needed to cool his heels for a year or two and learn that he isn't
    all that special.  
    
    All I'm saying is that Ayers is doing the same thing with Burp that
    Bob woulda done: Teaching a 6-8 225 lb talent with the emotional 
    maturity of a 6th grader that the team comes first and if he wants to
    whine he's welcome to move on.
    
    I think Burp, no Einstein, is catching on.  We cain thank Bob for that.
    Altruism, tough love, at its best!
    
    MrT
15.736DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 14:549
    So, if he was such a "haid" case, why did Bob Knight lower his "lofty"
    standards and recruit him in the first place?  Waiting...
    
    Let's see you back up your statement with some documented proof that
    the players went and complained to Knight about Lawerence.  Waiting...
    
    Patiently waiting...
    
    WILDCAT
15.737ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Wed Feb 19 1992 15:2518
    The team meeting has been well documented, talked about in any number
    a sports rags and on ESPN.  Lookit up joeself.
    
    It's not "if" Burpmeister was (is?) a haid case, the Burper admitted
    to it himself.  The extraordinary actions of his HS coach prove the
    same, and ditto for his HS teammates.  You deny that he got thrown
    off his HS squad despite being a top5 prepster as a junior?  Again,
    lookit up joeself.
    
    Also acknowledging that he's a haid case is Randy Ayers.  Not to
    mention Dick Vitale, and 43,281 others by my count.
    
    Bob didn't recruit Burper, Burpoid recruited Bob.  Bob laid out the
    program and said he'd have to change cuz the program wasn't gonna
    change for him.  Burp agreed, changed his mind, got called out for
    it by his teammates, and left.
    
    MrT
15.738How did you arrive at the 43,281 figure?AXIS::ROBICHAUDHomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCansecoWed Feb 19 1992 15:331
    
15.739One day Hawkeye fanCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Feb 19 1992 15:3812

	Michigan State at Indiana tonight.  A Hoosier win would set up a
nice Sunday afternoon of basketball this weekend.  Hard to imagine how Jim
Jackson could get held to 7 points by anyone.

	re. 736

	What are these ""lofty" standards"?  Is this just a response to comments
from T, or do you actually believe this?

tom
15.740UCONN would bury IowaDEMING::MCKAYWed Feb 19 1992 15:413
    43,281 is a very conservative estimate.
    
    Jimbo
15.741LUNER::BROOKSYou down wit MSG ?Wed Feb 19 1992 16:258
    Yo Roper, I'm waiting for T to come up with an excuse for why Bob would
    let his *players* make personnel decisions !
    
    Cain you see the players saying, "He goes or we go ?" to *Bob* ?
    
    Yeah right T !
    
    Doc
15.742DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 16:5610
    re MrT - Never questioned the fact he was thrown off of his HS team
    second semester senior season.  Questioned why Bob recruited him in the
    first place.  Furthermore, Lawrence did *NOT* recruit IU!  Ha, what a
    joke.
    
    re Tom - I mentioned "lofty" standards because we've been led to
    believe from MrT that Bob won't recruit anyone that's not on their way
    to Rhodes Scholardom ala Alan Henderson!
    
    WILDCAT
15.743MrT is losing grip on sanity.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Feb 19 1992 16:5713
    > Bob didn't recruit [Funderburke], [Funderburke] recruited him.
    
    Haw haw!  How quickly we forget the charges levied against Indiana
    recruiters for making an illegal contact with none other than Top5
    Lawrence Funderburke.  Whether the contacts were illegal or not is open
    to question, but you must be outa your cottin_pickin mind if you think
    one of the Top 5 HS players in the USA is gonna attend a University that
    didn't even recruit him.
    
    Thanks for the laugh though!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.744Knight should have gained the upper hand by letting goNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 19 1992 16:5818
    
    Everyone's missing the major point on the Funderburke situation. 
    Bob Knight giving the kid a chance and recruiting him was not the 
    problem.  Bob Knight giving him the boot after the kid screwed up was 
    not the problem.  The only problem was that Knight should have cleared
    Funderburke to go out and do whatever it was he wanted to do with his
    life (including play basketball with someone else), but Knight held him 
    to his Indiana commitment.  I'm a pseudo-Knight admirer, but I think
    giving the kid your best advice and then completely divorcing yourself
    of him if he doesn't want that advice would be the *right* thing to do, 
    regardless of the self-serving NCAA regs that make it legal (it 
    certainly would have completely erased any doubts about who was at 
    fault-- because it was Funderburke who was at fault).  Instead, Bob 
    Knight did appear to act out of revenge or in the best interests of 
    Indiana basketball.
    
    glenn
        
15.745DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 16:585
    RE DOC - Great point!  Who is running the ship at IU?  Has Bob lost
    touch?  One would think the inmates may be running the asylum after the
    50 point turn-around to Minnesota!
    
    WILDCAT
15.746DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 17:018
    I feel like we need to clear up a misconception that 'T has spread
    about Sir Lawrence of Funderburke.  Bob Knight DID NOT kick 'burke off
    the team.  Lawrence told him and IU to take a hike, and left of his own
    free will.  Knight wanted him to return to the team.
    
    HTH's
    
    WILDCAT
15.747AXIS::ROBICHAUDHomerSimpsonPinchHitsForCansecoWed Feb 19 1992 17:074
    	If you guys are waiting for MorT to get some facks you better
    make plenty of coffee.
    
    				/Don
15.748STRATA::CAPPELWed Feb 19 1992 17:1122
    T,                                         
    
    Just ignore Wildcat...
    
    Remember that he is a fan of one of the most corrupt, undisciplined
    and underachieving programs in the history of college basketball.
    They had no morals, no discipline and no 'lofty' standards....
    
    From Rupp to Joe B. Hall to Eddie Sutton.....
    
    I think he might be a tad bit envious and very jealous....
    
    And T, as to Doc Midnite, when was the last time he put something with
    substance in this notesfile.....
    
    Finally as to ACChris, he has such faith in his program that he is
    constantly predicting 'potential losses' to vastly inferior teams,
    dreaming up excuses for embarrassing losses and being blinded by his
    professed love for his idol.
    
    What a trio of basketball analysts.... NOT!
    
15.749Dean Smith = Guy Lewis + Freddy BrownHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelWed Feb 19 1992 17:140
15.750As a defender of personal freedoms I'm sure MrT agrees... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 19 1992 17:1517
    > I feel like we need to clear up a misconception that 'T has spread
    > about Sir Lawrence of Funderburke.  Bob Knight DID NOT kick 'burke off
    > the team.  Lawrence told him and IU to take a hike, and left of his own
    > free will.  Knight wanted him to return to the team.
    
    Whatever.  It's almost semantical.  At some point they reached an
    understanding that Funderburke would not be playing basketball ever
    again at Indiana.  My main point still stands.  Knight should have 
    decided to be the better man and let Lawrence play his act somewhere 
    else if that's what he really wanted.  That would have been completely
    consistent with Bob Knight's philosophy of only wanting players around 
    who want to be there and not stooping to NCAA-sponsored gamesmanship in
    the competition for players.  I think he mishandled this one.
    
    glenn
    
15.751Bob on the ropes, so Cap starts the personal attacks ...RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Feb 19 1992 17:349
    re: Cap
    
    Nice Objective Commentary there bub.  Really addresses the issues at
    hand ...
    
    :^(
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.752Where's the personal attack???STRATA::CAPPELWed Feb 19 1992 17:471
    
15.753STRATA::CAPPELWed Feb 19 1992 17:506
    Also there is no issue here.... only a new person trying to dredge up
    an old arguement...
    
    It doesn't bother me about the Funderburke situation, in my eyes it's
    no different than the Rozier situation(where Smith drove him away
    and he was illegally contacted by another school).
15.754Thypocrisy (tm) makes me sick.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Feb 19 1992 18:318
    > Also there is no issue here.... only a new person trying to
    > dredge up an old arguement
    
    Kinda reminds me of a couple_a noters who continuously bring up certain
    questions about a certain coach, don't it?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.755DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 18:5320
        RE .748
    
        Unbelievable babble!  Cap, you've obviously obtained you're writing
        style from reading too many articles from liberal, set agenda minded
        reporters!
    
        UK underachievers??? - NOT!!!  I've been fairly reluctant to bring up
        UK's past successes in the tourney, records set, etc.  If that's what
        it takes however, so be it!  UK more than holds its own with any school
        in the country in regards to basketball tradition.
    
        Please tell also what you've personally got on Rupp, Hall, and
        Sutton that the NCAA never had?  More garbage you've read from the
        National Enquirer no doubt!
    
        And now back to our regularly scheduled nonsense,
    
    
        :-)
        WILDCAT
15.756OutANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Wed Feb 19 1992 18:578
    Ok, all of you, get out of here.  Clear the room.  Leave this note.
    You come in here barking like dogs yip yip yip dredging up old bones
    that nobody's interested pinching loaves seeking only to make trouble.
    
    You're welcome to come back to 15 when you're ready to talk substantively
    about Big10 hoops.
    
    MrT
15.757*U* git out, until you clean up your act. RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Feb 19 1992 19:096
    Git out yourself MorT, at least until you apologize for your ridiculous 
    assertion that one of the Top5 players in the USA would attend a
    university that didn't even recruit him.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.758Out Crockmeister. OUT.ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Wed Feb 19 1992 19:261
    
15.759Kentucky's cheating is a matter of official NCAA record...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 19 1992 19:2719
    
    >    Please tell also what you've personally got on Rupp, Hall, and
    >    Sutton that the NCAA never had?  More garbage you've read from the
    >    National Enquirer no doubt!
    
    Is this a joke?  In addition to being a white supremacist who had to be
    dragged kicking and screaming into the 20th century (and finally into
    retirement), Rupp was cold-busted in the early 1950s by the NCAA and his 
    team effectively given a one-year death penalty (allowed to play only
    in exhibitions) after widespread recruiting violations were uncovered 
    during an NCAA game-fixing investigation that involved Kentucky.  Sutton 
    was fortunate to avoid the death penalty after a second strike against
    Kentucky (a fact that was acknowledged by the university administration). 
    Forget about the National Enquirer, do they have someone in Kentucky go 
    through the history books Soviet-style, erasing all references to these 
    violations and NCAA-enforced probations?
    
    glenn
    
15.760Rope's on the ropes. Haa. You cain stay Glenn!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Wed Feb 19 1992 19:291
    
15.761Just for the fun of it...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Wed Feb 19 1992 19:315
    re .755
    
    Maybe he got it from conservative, set-agenda journalists.
    
    JD
15.762Still waiting ...RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Feb 19 1992 19:407
    re: MrT
    
    You gonna explain to us how Funderburke went to IU unrecruited MorT, or
    am I gonna haveta pester you into submission?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.763Still a fan of the wandering one, btwCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Feb 19 1992 19:4718
Glenn,

	As an IU fan, I was also uncomfortable with Knight not letting 
Funderburke go out and sign up with whoever wanted him.  It didn't "feel"
right to me, and I'm sure as I can be that this sort of thing hurts Indiana
in the recruiting wars.

	I've heard two explanations for why Knight wouldn't let Funderburke
go.  One is, as you've said, that Knight was being vindictive.  The other is
that Knight has gotten tired of 18-year-olds that feel like they don't need
to live up to their commitments, and want to run away when things don't go 
their way.

I have no idea which, if either, is accurate, or if some combination of both 
is close to the truth.  As far as I know, Knight's never made any public
comments on the specifics of that situation.

tom
15.764NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 19 1992 19:5012
    
    > You gonna explain to us how Funderburke went to IU unrecruited MorT, or
    > am I gonna haveta pester you into submission?
    
    Who cares?  Like I said, it's a total non-issue.  Unless, of course,
    you believe that it's wrong to give a kid who meets the academic
    entrance requirements a chance because he's got an "attitude" tag.  It 
    didn't work out and I didn't like the way Knight handled it on the way 
    out, but that's irrelevant to the kid's recruitment...
    
    glenn
    
15.765STRATA::CAPPELWed Feb 19 1992 20:2119
    
    Wildcat,
    
    As Glenn so eloquently wrote, Rupp was considered one of the original
    slime in college basketball and Kentucky during his era was one of
    the most corrupt in the history of intercollegiate sports.  Maybe you
    need to do some historical reading in order to widen your scope on 
    the history of Wildcat basketball.  Send me mail and I can suggest some
    books for you....
    
    And you don't want to get me started on the corruption evident in 
    Eddie Sutton's tenure.  It's sad that you don't recognize these
    evident defenciencies in Kentucky's past.....
    
    Plus if Kentucky didn't underachieve than please explain why Joe B.
    Hall got the moniker, "Joe B. Hall - The Dean Smith of the 70's".
    
    Cap
    
15.766B-Ball History 101DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 20:2371
    Whoa Nellie!  Here we go again.  As long as we deal with specifics and
    not generalize, I guess I can live with it.
    
    re 15.759
    
    glenn, you are quite correct that Kentucky's infractions are part of
    official NCAA record.  You'll not find one single reference anywhere
    that I've stated anything to the contrary.  I stand by my original
    statement.  The NCAA found no wrong doing on the parts of Adolph Rupp,
    Joe Hall, and Eddie Sutton.  That's NONE.  Believe me, they tried their
    collective best in doing so.  UK's past problems were caused by over
    zealous idiots (boosters) who believed they were above the law since
    they were rick, etc.  A lack of institutional control was also a major
    factor.  By that I mean prior administrations had a bad habit of
    allowing boosters in the locker room prior to and after games.  That
    bad habit has been taken care of!
    
    Now, a couple of nits with your comments.
    
    >>  Is this a joke?  In addition to being a white supremacist who had to be
    >>  dragged kicking and screaming into the 20th century (and finally into
    >>  retirement), Rupp was cold-busted in the early 1950s by the NCAA and his
    >>  team effectively given a one-year death penalty (allowed to play only
    >>  in exhibitions) after widespread recruiting violations were uncovered
    >>  during an NCAA game-fixing investigation that involved Kentucky. 
    
    Where do you get this white supremacist garbage?  From reading one too
    many Sports Illustrated articles?  Give me a break!  Perhaps an SEC
    history lesson is in store?  I'll wait while you come up with some sort
    of justification for calling Adolph Rupp a "white supremacist".
    
    Secondly, Rupp wasn't "cold-busted" by anyone.  Three players on the
    team were found guilty of associating with a New York City gambler and
    fixing games.  No, repeat no recruting violations!  Adolph Rupp was
    totally exonerated by the NCAA.  Anyone who knows the kind of coach
    Rupp was knew that he'd never fix a game!  The man hated to lose. 
    Perhaps that's why he's the winningest coach in the history of college
    basketball.
    
       
    >> Sutton was fortunate to avoid the death penalty after a second strike
    >> against Kentucky (a fact that was acknowledged by the university 
    >> administration).
    
    Sutton avoided nothing.  The University avoided the death penalty. 
    Sutton wasn't sober enough at the time to realize the shape the program
    was getting into!  That point by the way is documented.  David Rosell,
    who was UK's President at the time, sold the University up the river. 
    He was on record as stating that he didn't like basketball to begin
    with.  UK could've and should've fought many of the charges levied
    against them in 1987.  They obviously did some things that were wrong. 
    Not denying that.  It wasn't nearly as "EVIL" as the press would have
    you believe.
    
    The NCAA had a Vendetta against UK in 1987.  You see they spent many
    months and dollars trying to nail them in 1985, but left Lexington
    red-faced and empty handed.  The investigation in 1987 dragged on for
    well over a year!  Recruiting was crippled for two seasons before any
    penalty was ever handed down.  Never before has the NCAA gone after a
    school the way they hounded UK.  Those are facts, not some UK fan
    spewing forth propaganda.  UK bent over backwards by cleaning house. 
    Firing the Athletic Director, forcing Sutton to quit, etc.  Never
    before has a school cleaned house this way.  Did the NCAA cut them any
    slack for admitting trangressions and cleaning house? - NOT!
    
    It's funny to see how the NCAA deals with other programs with a
    limp-wrist!
    
    Class dismissed,
    
    WILDCAT
15.767DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 20:248
    re -1 
    
    Should read - 
    
    Over zealous idiots (booster) who felt they were above the law because
    they were RICH not "rick"
    
    WILDCAT
15.768RAVEN1::B_ADAMSTime for some ROCK and roll!Wed Feb 19 1992 20:287
15.769DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 20:319
    CAP, see re -2 for my reply concerning Rupp, Sutton, etc.  Thanks for
    the offer on the books, but I've read my fair share.  As a matter of
    course I tend to form my own thoughts after reading said books and
    commentary.  It's too easy to be a "SHEEP" and blindly accept
    everything that John Feinstein, Frank Deford, and others write.
    
    HTH's
    
    WILDCAT
15.770DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 20:3620
   >>     And you don't want to get me started on the corruption evident in
   >>     Eddie Sutton's tenure.  It's sad that you don't recognize these
   >>     evident defenciencies in Kentucky's past.....
    
   >>     Plus if Kentucky didn't underachieve than please explain why Joe B.
   >>     Hall got the moniker, "Joe B. Hall - The Dean Smith of the 70's".
    
    CAP, perhaps you should re-read some of my prior notes over in 207
    concerning defenciencies in Kentucky's past.  I think you'll find that
    I've never denied said defenciencies!
    
    Also, please explain the bit about Joe being the "Dean Smith of the
    70's".  Quit while you're ahead, you'll get bloody on this one.  I've
    followed UK since 1972 and never heard that one.  If you'd like, I'll
    point you to the era in which some thought Joe underachieved.  Hint: 
    It was'nt in the 70's!
    
    HTH's
    
    WILDCAT
15.771RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Wed Feb 19 1992 20:4415
    Wildcat -
    So who did you read?  Were you a SHEEP in believing all you read? 
    Sounds like it to me.
    
    The richest moment in NCAA history was when all-black Texas Western
    beat Rupp and Kentucky for the NCAA title.  Old Rudolph was a might
    mad then.  
    
    Rupp was merely an icon for his times - a time which saw less racial
    equality then now - and outward bigotry was more accepted - especially
    in the south and border states.
    
    HTH.
    
    JD
15.772Wow, that really was one heck of a piece of propaganda...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Feb 19 1992 20:4616
    Wildcat, 
    
    I'll provide the sources for my contentions later, but first to the
    point.  Is it your honest assertion that while all the garbage was
    going on around Rupp and Sutton, they were in no way complicit?  That
    they had absolutely no knowledge?  That they were, in fact, both
    completely innocent of the charges?  Let's not hide behind the politics 
    of the NCAA and what they did or didn't say about the coaches in their 
    official reports (i.e. by sanitizing the charges with respect to the
    coaches with the old "institutional control" catch-all tag).  I want to 
    hear it straight: do you honestly believe these two coaches had nothing 
    to do with what was going on?
    
    glenn
     
15.773Still Standing :-)DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 20:4812
    Sheesh, this must be why Knight has such a rotten reputation.  So many
    people tend to read only the negative comments and either don't see or
    overlook the positive.  As MrT will attest, Knight has done plenty of
    positive things over the years that many will never hear about.
    
    Repeat after me, many writers have their own personal agendas, and will
    stop at nothing to defame individuals, etc.  In other words, DON'T
    BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU READ!
    
    Steadfast and True,
    
    WILDCAT
15.774RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Wed Feb 19 1992 20:5519
    Wildcat -
    
    No kidding about the writers.  You just think that up?  And I hope YOU
    listen to yourself - and don't just believe what you WANT to believe -
    but get the information from as many sources as you can.  It's easy to
    read something, not agree with it, and shake it off as "The writer has
    a secret agenda and is out to get my hero..."   That's easy, real easy.
    
    I'd venture a guess that hte vast majority of writers out there don't
    have agendas against people - but they report what the
    worshippers/fans/etc of people DON'T WANT TO HEAR.   One of the easiest
    cop outs of all time is to blame the media.  
    
    And yes, Bobby Knight has done many positive things.  And I've read
    about many of them.  They are reported on.  But folks who don't like
    Knight only remember the bad incidents.   It's the reader's perception
    in most cases, not the writer's words.
    
    JD
15.775Honest Question - Honest AnswerDYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 21:0827
    re .771
    
    JD, I'd like to comment, but I honestly find nothing there but
    subjective ramblings.  No thanks.
    
    re .772
    
    glenn, I think if you'll re-read my entry you'll find that it's fairly
    objective and not a "piece of propaganda".  My intentions were for it
    not to be propaganda in any event.  
    
    Since you asked, I'll try and answer your question's honestly.  I
    wasn't even a glimmer in my parents eye when Rupp's Cats were nailed. 
    But my gut feeling is that Rupp was innocent of any wrong doing.  The
    man wanted to win too badly to have ever been caught up in a
    point-shaving scandal.  BTW, the NCAA agreed.  As far as Sutton goes,
    I've gone on record earlier stating my disapproval of the way he
    handled the basketball program.  I believe however that he did not have
    a hand in the wrong doing, but knew something was amiss.  It's fairly
    well documented that Eddie Sutton was suffering from alcoholism while
    at UK.  This undoubtedly clouded the mans judgement.  I guess what I'm
    saying is that Sutton may not have done anything himself, but I believe
    he had knowledge of wrong doing.
    
    BTW, where does Joe Hall fit into all of this?
    
    WILDCAT
15.776DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 21:1716
    JD, I understand your point about reading/believing what you want to
    believe, etc.  It's a given however that writers tend to be
    vindictive, etc.
    
    Understand that since I live 2 1/2 hours from Lexington, and have
    lived in this area my entire life that I understand a little more than
    a person who doesn't live in this area about the goings on at UK, IU,
    OSU, etc.  People from other parts of the country get the news from
    National columnists.  We get it all here, both good and bad!  All I've
    tried to bring forth is that the "Nation" didn't get the entire story
    about what happened in Lexington 5 years ago.  If you think you did,
    then you're blind. :-)
    
    Still going and going and going (until dinner time that is!)
    
    WILDCAT
15.777RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Wed Feb 19 1992 21:308
    WILDCAT -
    
    I'd just like you to prove your statement that it's "a given however
    that writers tend to be vindictive, etc."
    
    All writers?  Or just those that write stuff you don't believe in.
    
    JD
15.778DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Wed Feb 19 1992 23:386
    JD, the only writers that are vindictive are those that write stuff I
    don't believe in.
    
    This should clear up any and all confusion.
    
    WILDCAT
15.77912 down, 6 to go, and they need to win 5CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsThu Feb 20 1992 02:1928
	Thought about entering this in the Southeastern Conference note, 
	but...

	Good win for Indiana over Michigan State tonight.  Amazing how much
	difference it makes where and when you play somebody.  Three weeks
	ago Indiana went to East Lansing undefeated in the conference, and
	got blown out by a Spartan team that had just given a game to 
	Michigan.  This time, the Hoosiers were all over them from the opening
	tap and it was no contest, 103-73.  Indiana led 55-26 at the half,
	with Cheaney and Anderson held to a combined 7 points.  Graham had
	18 in the half, Bailey had 15, and Henderson played an awesome game
	at both ends of the floor.

	Only downside for the Hoosiers was Matt Nover, who got quick fouls,
	kept playing the wrong defense, and insisted (unsuccessfully) on
	trying to score over Peplowski.

	The most amazing player in the conference has to be Matt Steigenga.
	He had 2 points tonight.   He's been interspersing 1 good game with
	3 or 4 bad ones for 4 years now, and I just can't figure it out.
	He's quick, he's pretty athletic, and he's a pretty good shooter; but 
	more often than not you'd swear he's not even in the game.  Go
	figure.

	Next up: Sunday at Ohio State for the conference lead.  

tom
15.780"remember I don't know a thing" CNTROL::CHILDSmake the right choice, TsongasThu Feb 20 1992 11:5110
 While I'll agree with you Wildcat on Rupp not being in on the fixes, why do
 you not address the illegal recruiting violations? Surely a man that wanted
 to win as badly as you say he did, wouldn't be above bending the rules?

 How can you say Sutton knew nothing when his son sat there aside of Eric 
 Manuel during his second SAT testing? I also seriously doubt Casey acted
 on his own. Sort like Regan and Iran if you get my drift...

 mike
15.781STRATA::CAPPELThu Feb 20 1992 12:3027
    Kentucky excuse #1
    
    Coach was drunk so could not be blamed for infractions committed by 
    his program.
    
    Re: Sheep
    
    Wildcat, 
    
    Maybe you should take a long look in the mirror and see if your fleece
    is 'white as snow'.  You've only been in this file a very short time
    and have not seen me criticize Knight(which I've done on many of an 
    occastion).  You seem to take on the Sheep moniker by blindly believing
    that there was no wrong done and making up feeble excuses for some of
    the worst transgressions committed in college basketball.
    
    Re: Joe B. Hall
    
    Make sure you have all your facts down before stepping over this line.
    My opinion as well as many of Kentucky's fans is that Hall greatly 
    underachieved with the amount of talent that he possessed at Kentucky.
    If you can argue with opinion than so be it, but I'm sure glad to see
    that the comment rattled you so......:-)
    
    It's amazing how quickly one can change the subject....:-)
    
    Cap
15.782LUNER::BROOKSYou down wit MSG ?Thu Feb 20 1992 12:3613
    T, while Glenn is right about the racist-white-supremecist Rupp, and
    the sleziod scum Sutton (I've hated him from his Arkansas days), you
    STEEL haven't come clean with the ThunderBump case.
    
    Don't try to divert the discussion ....
    
    And CapMeister, my sterling rep as an honest, objective noter of
    substance is safe, and will not be challanged by your Hoosier
    Propaganda ....
    
    The truth must win out !
    
    Doc
15.783As promised, a Kentucky basketball primer...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Feb 20 1992 13:30132
Wildcat, I dug up my sources (yes, Sports Illustrated) and found that the 
factual record is indeed in violent opposition to your version of events
at Kentucky.  Considering your feelings on the motives of these writers, 
feel free to ignore what you feel to be biased, opinionated material and 
concentrate on refuting the *facts* (NCAA reports on violations, first-
hand testimony, etc.).
    
>    Where do you get this white supremacist garbage?  From reading one too
>    many Sports Illustrated articles?  Give me a break!  Perhaps an SEC
>    history lesson is in store?  I'll wait while you come up with some sort
>    of justification for calling Adolph Rupp a "white supremacist".

I am well aware of the history of the SEC with regards to integration.  
However, just as in all parts of the country, there were those who spoke 
out against segregation, there were those who kept their mouths shut 
regardless of how they felt, and there were those with racist motivations 
who fought it tooth-and-nail, well past the time of change.  Rupp was 
indisputably in the latter category.  As a matter of fact, Kentucky was in
a position to *promote* change, because unlike with Mississippi and 
Alabama, the state government and university administration was pushing
for integration of the athletic programs (integration of the school had
long since occurred and the football team was integrated three years
before the basketball team, but Rupp still remained a straggler even by
SEC standards).  Rupp just wouldn't budge: 

[from SI, April 1, 1991]

	A couple of years earlier [than 1966, when Kentucky met Texas 
	Western in the famous championship game] Rupp, under pressure from
	Kentucky president John Oswald to recruit minority players, had 
	attained much publicity while recruiting a black center named 
	Westley Unseld, who instead chose his hometown school, Louisville.  
	Years later Unseld would tell friends that Rupp made a single 
	visit to his house, during which Rupp made it plain to Unseld's 
	parents-- Westley wasn't even home-- that he didn't want to be 
	there.  In a 1979 book entitled _Adolph_Rupp_as_I_Knew_Him_, the 
	Baron's longtime assistant, Harry Lancaster, revealed his boss's 
	recruiting agenda more fully.  Returning to his office after yet 
	another meeting with Oswald, Rupp told Lancaster, "Harry, that 
	sonofabith is ordering me to get some niggers in here.  What am I 
	going to do?" 

That was Rupp's trusted assistant of 20+ years that wrote that!  Another 
traitor?

In a newspaper interview after his retirement, Rupp had more to say about 
the impact of that game:

	In a 1975 interview with the Louisville Courier-Journal, 
	Rupp said that his "all-time favorite team" had lost the '66 NCAA 
	final to a "bunch of crooks".  He revealed a pathological side 
	of his sorrow.  He said that his biggest career disappointment was 
	"not winning in '66 and finding out that Texas Western had all 
	those ineligible players... one was on parole from Tennessee State 
	Prison.  Two had been kicked out of junior college in Iowa.  Texas 
	Western was suspended by the NCAA for three years after that".

In fact, all of Texas Western's players were academically eligible and no 
such NCAA suspension or probation ever occurred.


>    Secondly, Rupp wasn't "cold-busted" by anyone.  Three players on the
>    team were found guilty of associating with a New York City gambler and
>    fixing games.  No, repeat no recruting violations!  Adolph Rupp was
>    totally exonerated by the NCAA.  Anyone who knows the kind of coach
>    Rupp was knew that he'd never fix a game!  The man hated to lose. 
>    Perhaps that's why he's the winningest coach in the history of college
>    basketball.
 
Again, these are not the facts (NCAA violations and punishments do not 
cover activities like game-fixing or other crimes that are unknowingly 
committed outside and independent of the athletic program):

[from SI, May 29, 1989]

	Cheating is nothing new to the pages of Kentucky's basketball 
	scrapbook.  Adolph Rupp's 1952-53 team was nailed with what 
	amounted to the NCAA's first death penalty-- the Wildcats had to 
	sit out the winter playing intrasquad exhibitions-- because of 
	payments to players, which came to light during an investigation 
	into a point-shaving scandal involving several Wildcat players.

Joe B. Hall, you ask?:

	[In 1976], the NCAA announced that the Wildcats' scholarships 
	would be limited for two seasons because of recruiting violations.  
	Still, Hall gave the fat Cats boosters among the horsemen and 
	coal-mine operators in the commonwealth access to practices and 
	the locker room, even at halftime of games.
   
On the latest go-round...       

    > David Rosell,
    > who was UK's President at the time, sold the University up the river. 
    > He was on record as stating that he didn't like basketball to begin
    > with.  UK could've and should've fought many of the charges levied
    > against them in 1987.

Again, your version of events.  The NCAA had a completely different view 
of Roselle:

	If anyone can bring the Kentucky program under control, the 
	soft-spoken Roselle, a Duke Ph.D. who rooted for Blue Devils Art 
	Heyman and Jeff Mullins in the mid-1960s, can.  Last week the NCAA 
	went out of its way to praise him for what amounted to a textbook 
	investigation [note: the NCAA also explicitly stated in their 
	report that Kentucky's violations were sufficient to warrant the 
	death penalty and Roselle's cooperation was cited as the 
	difference].  Indeed, Roselle has emerged as a leader of the new 
	breed of university presidents who are trying to keep big-time 
	sports from compromising their schools' academic standings.

	Bad as the situation in Lexington may be, it could have been worse.  
	Still, the call-in shows are humming with vilifications of Roselle 
	for giving in, rather than with hosannas for having saved 
	basketball from imminent demise.  In January, Roselle said 
	privately that he was taking the biggest gamble any Kentucky 
	president could imagine by cooperating with the NCAA.  "If I 
	fail," he said, "no future president will have a chance to do 
	things right."
		Instead, thanks to Roselle, the Wildcats have another 
	chance to do things right.  One final chance.

By the way, guess who was the person responsible for bringing in C.M. 
Newton (the man most responsible for large-scale integration of the SEC, 
while at Alabama) as athletic director-- with friend Bob Knight's 
recommendation, and for convincing Rick Pitino to come to
Kentucky?  Yup, Roselle. 

glenn

15.784RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Thu Feb 20 1992 13:5911
    Glenn -
    
    Whatsamatta wif you?  Sports Illustrated.  All of them writers there
    got vindications against poo' ol' Kaintuck.  they all have hidden
    agendas.  You should read the local Kaintuck papers - they know better.
    
    Just like the local Las Vegas papers know ol Jerry Tark ain't done
    nothing wrong - just them gosh darn vindicitive secret agenda media
    folks who ruin it for that perfect gentlemain.
    
    JD
15.785STRATA::CAPPELThu Feb 20 1992 14:3914
    
    7,8,9,10.....
    
    And Wildcat still hasn't risen from one of the most viscious beatings
    that has ever been suffered in this notesfile.... :-)
    
    Wildcat, bit of advice for you, don't ever challenge Glenn when he
    makes a statement because I assure you that he has all of his facts
    together before writing a note on a potentially controversial subject.
    
    Ouch....
    
    
    
15.786Far more hilarious ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Feb 20 1992 16:0610
    re: .-1
    
    I wouldn't talk Cap.  Less than one (1) day after your unbelievable
    claim that Bob hasn't had a 'T' since 1987 MChilds reports he got one
    *** LAST NIGHT ***!!!  
    
    Haw haw!!11
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.787STRATA::CAPPELThu Feb 20 1992 16:074
    My sides are splitting....
    
    Oh well, still would be willing to bet that Dean has had more.  Would
    you like to wager????
15.788ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJihad vs McWorld (Tyrant Rexus)Thu Feb 20 1992 17:2411
    >You mean like Indiana? Those guys are so terrified of bla-aaah !!
    
    Bob has never been accused of anything.  There were rumors a asst.
    phoned a recruit a few years ago, and that about sums it up.  Mebbe
    you're thinking about the time Bob wrote a check of $80K for his
    (last) nukewidebody Landon Turner, but that was after he was paralyzed
    and so probably didn't concern the NCAA.
    
    HTH,
    
    MrT
15.789CNTROL::CHILDSmake the right choice, TsongasThu Feb 20 1992 18:0812
 Yeah but Bobby's T last night I'll venture to quess (considering the score)
 was a Red Auerbachiane style T, that's sole purpose was to send a message to 
 his team that no matter how bad the score, it ain't over till it's over. He's
 in the game for the duration and they dam well better be too...

 Snuff's was as whinny and stupid as they come considering that his team had
 just cut the lead to 5 just a few minutes earlier  only to see lead mushroom
 back up to 10, his own player just caught one so four shots and the ball.
 dumb dumb dumb dumb.......

 mike
15.790DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Thu Feb 20 1992 18:2264
    RE 15.780
    
    >> While I'll agree with you Wildcat on Rupp not being in on the fixes,
    >> why do you not address the illegal recruiting violations?  Surely a
    >> man that wanted to win as badly as you say he did, wouldn't be above
    >> bending the rules?
    
    >> How can you say Sutton knew nothing when his son sat there aside of
    >> of Eric Manuel during his second SAT testing?  I also seriously
    >> doubt Casey acted on his own.  Sort like Regan and Iran if you get
    >> my drift ...
    
    Mike, why don't I address illegal recruiting violations?  Simply
    because I wasn't asked my opinion on them.  Be glad to share them with
    you however.  First of all I have a problem with the statment "surely a
    man that wanted to win as badly as you say he did, wouldn't be above
    bending the rules?".  
    
    Come on now Mike, neither you, myself, or anyone truly know what's
    inside the heart of another man.  I have know idea how Rupp's great
    desire to win affected his decisions.  I know that I also have a great
    desire to win at anything I undertake but that desire is tempered by a
    desire to be a man of integrity.  Now, my opinion on that is another
    matter.  I just take major offense when we jump all over a person when
    we don't know all that went on.
    
    Was Adolph Rupp as pure as the driven snow?  Extremely doubtful.  Was
    he any worse then any other big-time collegiate coach?  Don't know the
    answer to that one.  Perhaps, perhaps not.  I've never, NEVER said Rupp
    was without blemishes.  I do however get a hearty laugh whenever I see
    someone read one man's opinion in an SI article and take that as the
    absolute truth.  I'm not defending Rupp here, I'm talking about
    gathering ALL the facts and coming to some sort of intelligent
    decision.  A certain noter has made reference to me living in a cave
    buried to my neck with Lexington Herald Leaders!  Couldn't be further
    from the truth.  All I'm saying is that I and others who live in this
    area (Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky) have much more information on the
    goings on at the University of Kentucky then people in other parts of
    the country.  Just as people on the East Coast have much more
    information on St. Johns, U Conn, and North Carolina then I.
    
    Now, on to our man Eddie Sutton.  If you'll take a minute and read some
    of my past notes on Sutton in the SEC topic, etc.  You'll find that
    I've never defended the actions of him.  I have mentioned his
    alcoholism.  I've never said that this was an excuse for him to be
    totally exonerated from wrong doing.  I belive Sutton was in charge of
    the program along with Cliff Hagan, program went bad, and that he
    should take the burden of responsibility.  No less, no more. 
    
    BTW, Mike, Sean Sutton DID NOT sit next to Eric at the SAT's.  That was
    the original story from the media.  Sutton gave Manuel a ride to the
    test, and if you'd like I'll dig up the NCAA's transcript on this. 
    Just a small nit, but shows that it's hard to believe everything you
    read.
    
    CAP and glenn.  You're next!  I'm still standing and gathering steam. 
    glenn, I do appreciate you quoting sources, particulary Harry
    Lancaster.  I do believe you're being objective.  We may just be
    arguing semantics.  I'll return the favor with some quotes this
    evening.  CAP on the other hand, it appears you're just hanging on in
    this little discussion to try and rattle some cages with inane
    commentary.  Try harder.  :-)
    
    WILDCAT
15.791Underutilized perhaps. But only cause Salvadori is so good ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Feb 20 1992 18:3716
    re: MChilds
    
    Yea except for the fact that, as someone else mentioned, Carolina
    started getting *lots* of calls go their way from that point forward. 
    The lead was down to 5 again and the game within reach.  Unfortunately
    at that point ESPN decided it was in the viewers best interest to go
    watch timeouts.  :^(
    
    
    re: Ross
    
    Ah yes, Carolina loses so it's time for the obligatory Carolina/Montross
    sip note.  ***YAWN***.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.792SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition Candidates!Thu Feb 20 1992 18:484
       I'd rather watch timeouts than a Dean induced foul-a-thon. Why caint
    these guys take a loss like a main instead of turning 5 minutes into
    15!!?
                                          Denny
15.793STRATA::CAPPELThu Feb 20 1992 19:0847
    >CAP on the other hand, it appears you're just hanging on in
    >this little discussion to try and rattle some cages with inane
    >commentary.  Try harder.  :-)
    
    I'd say for the amount of effort that I put into this it was incredibly
    effective.  Let's look at the scenario:
    
    1: Wildcat is attacking B. Knight over a non-issue dealing with 
       L. Funderburke.
    2: Cap enters a small statement saying to ignore Wildcat because
       he is simply in awe of the IU program due to the corruption
       that has occured at Wildcat's favorite program.
    3: Wildcat launches into a diatribe about how is program is
       misunderstood and misinterpreted.  An embarrassing note filled
       with denials and excuses.
    4: Glenn than whomps Wildcat upside the 'haidbone with pure facts
       that leave Wildcat shaken, bloodied and confused....
    5: Cap sits back, laughs and wonders what happened to the Bobby 
       Knight discussion(Although this Kentucky one is a good one).
    
    You see Wildcat you can say anything you want about Knight, because it
    doesn't bother me in the least bit.  I understand his faults, have 
    commented on how embarrassed I've been by certain actions in the past
    associated with Knight and understand that he has made mistakes(both
    personally and coaching mistakes).  So you are allowed to have your
    opinion and won't get a rise out of me if you criticize Knight(and I
    might agree with you on occasion).  Personally I feel that Knight
    should have let Funderburke out of his committment but since I don't
    know the reasons why Knight did this than I am comfortable with his
    decision to do so as he could have had a very valid reason for doing
    this.....
    
    A suggestion is that you should join us and focus some of your
    basketball energy towards analyzing why Dean Smith is the biggest
    underachiever in the history of college basketball.  It's highly
    enjoyable and reaps great benefits as it's easy to score decisive
    victories over a certain pro-Dean Smith noter.  
               
    However you do need to face up to the fact that Kentucky has had 
    one of the most corrupt programs in the history of college basketball.
    They made a very good move, getting C.M. Newton and Pitino and
    hopefully will run a clean program in the future(I enjoy watching a 
    Pitino coached team and think Rick is one of the better young coaches
    in the game) but you can't ignore nor really defend their past as it
    is full of transgressions and violations.
    
    Cap
15.794CNTROL::CHILDSmake the right choice, TsongasThu Feb 20 1992 19:1410
 I'm the one who stated UNC got alot of calls after the T's Chris. Which in
 a way I'd admit on the surface makes Dean's tirade look a smart move cause
 he finally got what he'd been begging for all night, all season etc, all the
 calls but my problem is that it wasn't caculated he's been carrying on like
 this for how many years? With his talent, his supposed superior intellect of
 the game etc., does he really need all the calls too? Is he that insecure?
 Untrusting of the system?

 mike
15.795Amazing. Simply, amazing.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Feb 20 1992 20:0315
    > Personally I feel that Knight should have let Funderburke out of 
    > his committment but since I don't know the reasons why Knight did 
    > this than I am comfortable with his decision to do so as he could 
    > have had a very valid reason for doing this.....
    
    My my, how we're so "comfortable" when it comes to decisions Bob makes
    where the movitations and details surrounding them aren't public 
    knowledge, yet when Dean Smith punishes King Rice but decides not to go 
    public with the details, you're all over him.
    
    Can you say "Thypocrisy (tm)"?  I knew you could ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
15.796My only response to such a weak attemptSTRATA::CAPPELThu Feb 20 1992 20:2637
    Only a small discrepency here....
    
    To my knowledge Knight has never been publicly asked to explain his 
    decision and Funderburke has never complained about the situation in which 
    Knight held back his committment. Knight does not pull punches and if
    asked about the situation he would have honestly given his reasons
    behind it.  
    
    However, King Rice was arrested, charged and was found guilty of committing
    a crime in which Dean Smith completely ignored.  It was part of the 
    public record and for the integrity of the school and program Smith
    should have publicly denounced Rice's actions and punished him for
    this embarrassing criminal activity.
    
    Lot's of young people look up to players in major college programs
    and Smith sent out the wrong message by not decrying the act to 
    be wrong and letting him go unpunished.
    
    Smith doesn't have the integrity nor the backbone to take a public
    stance like this.  His lack of response showed everyone that abusing
    alcohol, beating up a woman, destroying property and resisting arrest
    is ok by Dean Smith and the Carolina program.
    
    Dean was too worried about losing his point guard than to do the right
    thing and send a message to his players, the university and the fans.
    
    So in your book beating up a woman is good, but holding a kid to his
    committment is bad.  What if it was your daughter that was attacked and 
    beat up by a college basketball player???  Me thinks your position
    would change.
    
    It's a very sad situation and one in which you should be ashamed of
    supporting.  
    
    Cap
    
    
15.797RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Thu Feb 20 1992 20:598
    Chris -
    
    I don't remmber Fundebunk beating up on a woman, ala King Rice.  Big
    difference, in my book.  IMO, King shoulda been chucked from the team
    for such an offense - but I guess in Dean's book its okay to slap a
    woman around...
    
    JD
15.798Tried to resist, Mildcat, really I did :^)CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsThu Feb 20 1992 21:379
    RE .745 - Great point!  Who is running the ship at MSU?  Has Jud lost
    touch?  One would think the inmates may be running the asylum after the
    46 point turn-around to Indiana!

    
    WILDCAT - NOT!!!



15.799AXIS::ROBICHAUDTalkin' SoftballFri Feb 21 1992 11:204
    	I was still wonderin' did Knight recruit Funderburke or did
    Funderburke recruit Knight?  Will we ever know?
    
    				/Don
15.800CAMONE::WAYYou'll be left with empty armsFri Feb 21 1992 11:353
Does any body really know what time it is?

Does anybody really care?
15.801caring about time is alot like rugbyCST17::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Fri Feb 21 1992 11:481
    
15.802Cap like a Cat backed into a corner whenever Bob is threatenedRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 21 1992 12:5461
>    However, King Rice was arrested, charged and was found guilty of committing
>    a crime in which Dean Smith completely ignored.  It was part of the 
>    public record and for the integrity of the school and program Smith
>    should have publicly denounced Rice's actions and punished him for
>    this embarrassing criminal activity.
    
    This is a 100% bald-faced lie.  "Completely ignored"?  You can't be
    serious.  Didn't publicly denounce?  I posted the exact text of Dean's
    press release after the incident, during which he most definitely
    publicly denounced Rice's poor judgement.  You're way, way off base
    here, with your only axe to grind the fact that Dean didn't publicly
    state exactly what punishments he imposed, a matter he considered
    private.
    
>    Lot's of young people look up to players in major college programs
>    and Smith sent out the wrong message by not decrying the act to 
>    be wrong and letting him go unpunished.
    
    Another lie.  He did speak out against the event and did punish Rice.
    What kind of integrity can you hope to maintain when you state
    completely incorrect information?  [none]
    
>    Smith doesn't have the integrity nor the backbone to take a public
>    stance like this.  His lack of response showed everyone that abusing
>    alcohol, beating up a woman, destroying property and resisting arrest
>    is ok by Dean Smith and the Carolina program.
    
    What a load.  Not even the most orthodox of Weasel would dare suggest
    that Dean doesn't have integrity or a backbone to take a public stand. 
    He benched JR Reid prior to an NCAA Tournament game for missing curfew
    by a few minutes.  Why don't you go ask your buddy Bob Knight what kind
    of integrity Dean has - or anybody else on the planet who possesses
    even the smallest understanding of what integrity is all about.
    
>    Dean was too worried about losing his point guard than to do the right
>    thing and send a message to his players, the university and the fans.
    
    Bull.  Dean had recruited a PG who was more talented than Rice.  Most
    coaches would've written King off and gone with the freshman.  
    
>    So in your book beating up a woman is good, but holding a kid to his
>    committment is bad.  What if it was your daughter that was attacked and 
>    beat up by a college basketball player???  Me thinks your position
>    would change.
    
    Spare us the melodrama.  The woman involved was his girlfriend, not a
    total stranger.  Rice was wrong - I've said it, Dean's said it, our
    criminal justice system has said it.  Rice pulled community service
    time for his offense.  The only issue at hand is whether Dean's
    punishments shoulda been made public.  BIG DEAL.
    
>    It's a very sad situation and one in which you should be ashamed of
>    supporting.  
    
    Ashamed of supporting the fact that Dean Smith decided to punish King
    Rice without telling the whole world what those specific punishments
    were.  Oh yea, this is a moral transgression that ranks up there with
    the worst of 'em all right.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.803Say what!?SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesFri Feb 21 1992 13:033
      What in the world difference does it make that the girl was his
    'girlfriend' and not a 'total stranger'?
                                    Denny
15.804Nit-picking around the edges of both men's established integrityNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Feb 21 1992 13:0412
    Both the King Rice and Lawrence Funderburke situations are complete
    non-issues that pale in comparison to some of other the stuff that has
    gone on in intercollegiate sports.  Not only are they both non-issues,
    depending on your interpretation they both may even be examples of 
    coaches doing *right* (considering Smith's hidden punishment of Rice and
    Knight's missing explanation for holding back Funderburke we're dealing
    with incomplete information).  The attacks from both sides on these two 
    situations are clearly motivated out of self-interest and partisanship...
    
    glenn
    
15.805FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Feb 21 1992 13:2033
    I back Knight 100% on the Funderburke issue - except for why he didn't
    let him out of the letter of intent.  I think he should have.
    
    I back Smith 100% on the Rice issue - especially on not making the
    punishment public, because I don't think it needed to be.  Not
    everything that goes on with an athletic team can or should be public
    knowledge, and I don't think this equates to it being swept under the
    rug.
    
    If we're going to attack anyone in college basketball, we should be
    spending our time attacking the sleazeballs - not these two guys.  Who
    does and who doesn't get a technical foul and why and for how long
    between technicals is completely irrelevant.  The only shortcoming in
    Smith's career is the relative lack of national championships he's won.
    Chris is obviously happy with this lack.  Most of us either sincerely
    are not or use it as a means of needling him about it.  Besides, it
    means more national championships available for your favorite team, so
    I don't see why it should bother you - you should be glad that Smith
    "chokes."
    
    If you objectively ask the question (as I have), if you had a
    basketball playing son, would you have him play for this man, I think
    you can answer the question, objectively, yes in both cases.  If I had
    a son and if he was going off to play for Knight, however, I would make
    damn sure he knew what he was getting into and be able to handle it - I
    equate playing basketball at Indiana to a certain degree to enlisting
    in the Marines.  If he was going off to play for Smith, I would make
    sure he knew the System is above all and Smith will stick with it and
    never deviate from it even when it's not working.
    
    Time to crawl back into my hole.
    
    John
15.806RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Feb 21 1992 13:425
    Apologies to Cap for calling him a "liar".  Uninformed may have been a
    better choice.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.807DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Fri Feb 21 1992 13:443
    Excellent note John.  You need to crawl out of your hole more often!
    
    WILDCAT
15.808CNTROL::CHILDSmake the right choice, TsongasFri Feb 21 1992 13:538
 Well I do have a son and if given the choice I'd have my son play for Bobby.
 Why? Because Bobby's system rewards players that work hard from week to week,
 year to year. Dean's system rewards seniors requardless of their lack of
 ability or work habits. Bobby adapts better in the clutch, and isn't against
 changing his system to fit his players, the other guy is a stubborn ole coot.

 mike
15.809ESKIMO::CAPPELFri Feb 21 1992 14:559
    
    Thanks ACChris,
    
    I never read an issued statement from Dean or attributed to Dean on
    the King Rice situation and if he did condemn these actions publicly
    that I reverse my stand.....
    
    It's true that the punishment did not have to be made public as long
    as the actions were condemned by the university and coaching staff.
15.810ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Feb 21 1992 15:3526
    re .793
    
    Classic note Cap.  You genius you.  If I were in the same city as
    you I'd have your toes jammed in my mouf' right now!
    
    As for the Burp, he had extreme behavioral problems as a youth.  He
    got into some very serious trouble.  His family background is such
    that what I heard from a buddy who partied with Randy Ayers in Mpls.
    last year cain't even be entered in here.  Let's just say he comes 
    from a past that raises eyebrows even in the ghetto.
    
    Kids like this often get sent away to the Marines or Infrantry to
    figure it all out.  They have no choice but to, cuz you cain't quit.
    Burp decided he wasn't up to the Marines and wanted to stay and slough.
    His fellow soldiers said either measure up or wash out.  He washed. 
    
    I agree with Bob for not releasing him.  He needed a final lesson that
    being a widebody nuke doesn't mean a separate set of rules.  Not only
    did he learn that lesson, he publicly stated he felt bad about quitting,
    holds nothing against Bob, and is glad he ended up at OSU.  If you
    followed the list a some a the scumbag programs he wanted to go to if
    he'd been released you'll agree he's better off on a team with people
    like Jim Jackson and Randy Ayers to help this emotional 12 year old
    grow up.
    
    MrT
15.811Go for 7 again, JJ, go for 7CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsSat Feb 22 1992 12:3715
	This note is NOT related to any on-going Lawrence Funderburke
discussion.

	Just read in the local paper that Dick Vitale has issued an apology
for remarks he made about Funderburke during a commercial break.  Apparently
the announcers were viewing a replay of an exchange of forearms between
the Wandering One and Chris Street, and Vitale said "That (expletive) 
shouldn't even be in college basketball - we were right."  His mike was live,
so the comment went out over the satellite feed.

	Anybody see this play?  Was Vitale overreacting (does he ever NOT
overreact), or has Funderburke still not cleaned up his act?

tom
15.81213 down, 5 to go, 4 would do itCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Feb 24 1992 01:5317
	Big 6-point win for the Hoosiers today at Columbus.  Alan Henderson
and Calbert Cheaney led the way offensively, but Cheaney's defense on JJ
may have been the difference in the game.  Jackson ended up with 24, but most
of those came in the second half off of switches that left him posted up on
Damon Bailey.  Cheaney effectively made Jackson a second option, and Ohio 
State's offense suffered for it.

	Lawrence Funderburke continues to impress on the defensive end, but
the Buckeye offense has seemed out of synch ever since he became eligible, 
and you have to wonder if they'll be able to find their stride before the end
of the season.  The Hoosiers, on the other hand, continue to show that their
a very good team on the offensive end when the jump shots fall early.

	Next up:  Illinois in Bloomington on Sunday.

tom
15.813ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 24 1992 13:3847
    Biggest win for my Hoosiers since '87.  Their first grade A road win
    of the year.  The non-Almost Big10 Title is theirs for the taking now,
    all they have to do is match OSU with the tough road games and hold
    at home.
    
    On the Hoosiers: They proved they cain win a tough one even with 
    1) Eric Anderson still mired in his inexplicable shooting slump, 
    2) GGraham - who's challenged Calbert for best player - having a quiet
    game, 3) poor shooting from the guard position and, 4) their usual poor
    start on offense.
    
    They outrebounded the Buckeyes 32-30.  Calbert Cheaney's floor game has
    been inspired, playing at a level hard to imagine before his "humiliating"
    benching by the "insane" Bob Knight.  He shut JJ down.  He got critical
    'bounds.  He moved relentlessly without the ball.
    
    The best news out a this game for the Hoosiers is Alan Henderson. Hindu
    arrived in a road game against a very tough team going up against big
    quick guys like Jent and Burp... and he starred.  From the opening bell
    Hindu looked possessed, taking charge in the paint and with the ball in
    his hands.  He shot 10-13 on the day with 9 'bounds, several blocked
    shots, and 24 points.  If Hindu cain keep himself at this level the
    Hoosiers might be an outside shot to overcome the deep widebody squads 
    and move into the Final4.
    
    Ohio State?  I like Randy Ayers, he's a great recruiter and his teams
    play inspired ball and tough D.  But his teams' offensive execution is
    sloppy and inefficient.  It looks like OSU is in the midst of a late
    year mini-fade for the 2nd year in a row.  
    
    Also, anybody notice how Burpoid disappeared in the 2nd half?  Yes he
    made a number of awesome blocks and 'boards but the Hoosiers kept
    running it straight at him and he faded.  Hindu outplayed him just like
    Calbert outplayed JJ.  At *their* place.
    
    It was also great to see Damon come out and be physically intimidated 
    by bigger quicker guards and manage to establish himself.  "Airr Haiiids!!
    Airrr Haiiids!!"  He shot 6-12 with 3-5 from the Land o' Trey and 17 pts.
    
    Only criticism of the Hoosiers is how the guards kept picking up the 
    dribble down the stretch.  But maybe Bob had told them to do this for
    some reason.
    
    Funderburke is a thug who doesn't belong in the Big10 and definitely
    never belonged in an Indiana uniform.
    
    MrT
15.814RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Mon Feb 24 1992 14:198
    MrTr -
    
    Henderson sure did look good.  Anderson's shooting woes have, IMO, not
    bothered the rest of his game - he played good defense and had some
    great blocks in the 2nd half.   Calbert is playing very well, and
    Bailey is showing more confidence in his game every time I see him.
    
    JD
15.815we may never knowANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 24 1992 14:1922
    Funderburke had 8 pts, 9 'bounds, and 7 blocked shots.
    
    On the Vitale comment, here's what happened.  In the Iowa vs. OSU
    game a week ago, Burp did his usual thing and clocked Chris Street
    with a forearm to the chin, reminiscent of the clothesline job he
    laid on Damon at Bloomington earlier this year, and several other 
    cheap shots he's pulled since he donned the red & silver.
    
    After the refs separated them a TO was called.  Vitale assumed his
    mike was dead.  He said, "Did you see that? This &#)&^%#$@# Funderburke
    guy doesn't belong in college basketball, he's proved us right."
                                                               
    You cain feel in the blank as to what Vitale said.  But those watching
    the game on satellite dishes and rural cable networks that cain't sell
    the commercial time heard it live.
    
    I've got a college buddy who's VP a a media outfit that runs several
    cable operations checking to find out what Dickie said.  Trouble is the
    engineers usually keep the sound muted on the live feed as they sit
    there in the cable control operations center.
    
    MrT
15.816AXIS::ROBICHAUDDeanSmith &gt; SteveKnightMon Feb 24 1992 15:144
    	Can we safely assume that Indiana played the perfect game
    yesterday, given their dearth of BIGMAN talent?
    
    				/Don
15.817HYDRA::HAUSRATHBearCATS &gt;&gt;&gt; BuckeyesMon Feb 24 1992 15:365
    
    OSU is overrated...   Expect an early exit from the NCAA's for the 
    Buckeyes.  
    
    /Jeff
15.818CELTIK::R_QUINNMon Feb 24 1992 15:4320
    
    It is an observation of mine that the IU win was due not only to the
    solid(but not great) defense and the OSU offensive execution was poor
    as mentioned.  I ususally hate to agree with announcers but Packer was
    totally right in that OSU didn't go back to JJ after he brought them
    back.  Their offensive was to get JJ open off screens or whatever but
    after the game was tied he would come off the screen and someone would
    already be shooting the ball.  Particularly Baker and Brown had poor
    second halfs.  Cheaneys D was good in a denial phase but if and when JJ
    got the ball in his hand it didn't matter whether Cheaney or Baily was
    on the D, they got used up.  
    
    There is certainly and Knight(pun intended) and day difference in IU
    when a few J's fall.  It makes even their passing 3 or 4 times more
    efficient.  To OSU discredit they still didn't figure out, no matter how
    many passes the ball was still going back to the hot guy.  Which is why
    they didn't use the tactics themselves.
    
    Roy L. Quinn
    x31141
15.819ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 24 1992 15:5739
    JJ was covered primarily by Calbert in the first half and shot
    poorly.  In the 2nd half they went to switches in order to get
    Damon on JJ (this despite the FACK that Damon was established in
    H.S. as one a the most talented guards in the game's history, he
    of the putative 36" leaping ability) and raised JJ's shooting to
    12-23.  Even then, with everybody in the building aware that JJ
    was gonna run the clear out 1-on-1 against Damon JJ had the ball
    taken out a his hands by help-out guys 2-3 times which clinched 
    the game.
    
    Calbert has learned how to get his jump against his assignment and
    maintain verticality with his blocking-hand and not make the stupid
    foul.  Eric and Alan were doing the same thing: Beaten along the
    baseline they bothered the shooter without making the desperation
    foul - probably the key to the win.
    
    re: /Roach
    
    Yeah, they *did* play at peak efficiency despite the lack a a BIGMAN.
    They played great D, boarded well, kept running the offense, and after
    their usual bad J-shooting at the outset ended up shooting well.
    
    But there's a twist.  If Alan cain play at that level they're much less
    weak along the baseline.  True, OSU is a 3-guard team and relatively
    small, so it's not indicative of what they cain do against, say, an
    Arkansas or Zona or UCLA.  But if Alan, all 6-9 200 lbs a him, cain
    play with the intensity of yesterday his good timing hands and quickness
    make them harder to punish in the paint.
    
    Regardless they'll still be woefully shallow in the front-court, with 
    only the extremely limited Matt Nover as a backup.  But if they stay
    out a foul trouble and play some inside D and rebound ok and Alan's
    progress continues then Indiana cain potentially upset one a the top
    teams in the tourney.
    
    Michigan will be a good litmus test of how they cain do against nuke
    widebodystud talent.
    
    MrT
15.820IU vs. OSUJURAN::MCKAYMon Feb 24 1992 15:5711
    I didn't think JJ was shut down by anyone.  He certainly abused 
    Bailey on the low post in the second half.  I think OSU should have
    used him more in the O.
    
    I thought it was a good game to watch.  OSU had the lead the entire
    first half until the last few minutes.  Bailey hit a great three
    pointer from inside the half court line to end the half.  I thought
    the difference in the game was Indiana was hitting the three and 
    OSU didn't.
    
    Jimbo 
15.821ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Feb 24 1992 16:0931
    JJ himself stated after the game that he had a lousy first half cuz
    Calbert & Co. did a great job a denying him the ball.  Also, in the
    1st half Calbert forced JJ to miss some shots and to change others.
    JJ even had a shot stuffed back into his face!
    
    The buckets that JJ did get in the 1st half were often of the highlight
    film variety, one a drive n' stop in the lane where Cheaney stayed with
    him and JJ leaped backwards toward the foul stripe and double pumped an
    eye-popping fall-down fadeaway to the bottom of the net.
    
    This is why in the 2nd half OSU decided to run picks designed to get
    JJ away from Calbert and isolated against the all-time-great-talent
    Damon Bailey.  They did this several possessions in a row.
    
    I thought the difference in the game was the grade C offensive scheme
    that Randy Ayers is somehow stuck with, and that Indiana stayed in
    their offense the whole way through, even when they were down by 10
    points.
    
    Funny thing, if you didn't know the score and watched the first half -
    with ThunderBurp making mindblowing blocks and bodies-flying 'bounds
    and JJ dropping impossible shots with Calbert laying all over him - 
    you couldn't have believed that with 2 minutes left in the half that 
    Indiana was down by only 2.
    
    Then the two Damon treys, then the 2nd half outset run, then the failed
    reliance on the JJ clearouts, not to mention ThunderBurp's disappearance
    in the 2nd half.  Wish I had a film of the game to see what Bob put on
    Burp after the half, it worked.
    
    MrT
15.822Not too easy for either oneCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsTue Feb 25 1992 01:1125

	Remaining schedule for the Hoosiers and the Buckeyes:

	Ohio State			Indiana
	----------			-------

	2/26  at Purdue
	2/29  at Michigan State
					3/1   Illinois
	3/3   Michigan
					3/4   at Iowa
	3/7   Northwestern
					3/8   at Michigan
	3/11  Illinois
					3/12  Wisconsin
	3/14* at Minnesota		3/14* at Purdue

	* - both games have a 3/15 alternate date

	Nice time for a week off for the Hoosiers.  By the time they play 
	again, they'll have a pretty good idea of what they have to do to 
	win the title.

tom
15.823CNTROL::CHILDSmake the right choice, TsongasTue Feb 25 1992 13:2112
 What Packer failed to mentioned is that after JJ brought them back by
 abusing Damon, Bobby brought Reynolds in off the bench to play JJ. Chris
 Reynolds is one of the best players in teh game at overplaying his opponent
 and not allowing him to get the ball...

 Bobby sure is patient with Damon...

 Henderson's game was a great surprise. I thought he not Calbert should have
 been player of the game...

 mike
15.824ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Feb 25 1992 13:2818
    So it all comes down to the week of the 8th.  Although Gene Keady
    always has something up his sleeve when the Hoosiers roll into that
    snakepit called Mackey Arena.
    
    I see the Michigan game as a perfect test for the Hoosiers.  I also
    could barely believe that the AP has Iowa ranked at about 40th.
    
    The Buckeyes may be in for a nasty surprise when they come to 
    Williams - the Gophers are a young team that should be at their best
    at season's end, and will have best-player Randy Carter back in shape
    by then.
    
    Yoder announced he's leaving Wisconsin, the school's buying out his
    contract.
    
    MrT
    
     
15.825Things could change, but probably will not...CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RTue Feb 25 1992 14:2812
>    Regardless they'll still be woefully shallow in the front-court, with 
>    only the extremely limited Matt Nover as a backup.  But if they stay
>    out a foul trouble and play some inside D and rebound ok and Alan's
>    progress continues then Indiana cain potentially upset one a the top
>    teams in the tourney.
    
     It will be pretty hard to "upset one a the top teams in the tourney"
     when they will likely be a #1 seed in either the East, Southeast, or
     Midwest regionals.  Unless teams make some major blunders, it appears
     to me that Duke, Indiana, Kansas, and UCLA should be the top seeds in
     the 4 regionals.  Any IU victory before the final four could not be
     considered an upset.
15.826UM season rides on March 8thDTIF::MCEVOYTue Feb 25 1992 15:1031
    I think Michigan will beat Indiana in Ann Arbor for a couple of 
    reasons:
    
    1) Michigan has the best talent in the Big Ten
    2) Chrysler will be rockin' for that game; it will too loud for the
       refs to hear/be-intimidated-by Knight
    3) This is the biggest game of the year for the Wolverines
    
    The current Michigan team is similar in talent to the Joubert/Grant
    years in Ann Arbor. Typically, they would lose @ Indiana even though
    they had no business doing so (Frieder can't coach,) then they would
    come back and paste Indiana in the Ann Arbor game. I look for the same
    thing to happen this year, UM big. Of course, they lost in Bloomington
    this year as well, Fisher cant coach either.
    
    I look for a real exciting NCAA tourney this year. There is no dominant
    team, I think the championship could go to any of the top ten or twenty
    teams, whoever gets on a roll. 
    
    From the Big Ten, I think OSU still has the best shot at winning the
    whole thing, and of course you can't count out Indiana with Knight.
    
    Michigan has a shot if they get on a roll, but they'll probably lose
    as soon as they run into a coach on a neutral floor.
    
    MSU has a shot, Jud always has them ready, but I don't know if there's
    enough talent to go all the way.
                    
    -dennis 
    
    
15.827ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Feb 25 1992 15:3120
    I agree that OSU has the best shot at the NCAA Title, and that MSU
    could be tough if they found any consistency cuz they have the pieces.
    I have been disappointed in the job Jud's put in with this squad the
    past two years, but he cain coach and might get the inconsistency
    problem fixed by tourney time.
    
    I also agree that Indiana should lose at Crisler.  But they shoulda
    lost at St. John and they ended up controllling the 2nd half.  UM
    will win big ONLY if they totally dominate up front (blocks, boards)
    which is a possibility.  If they only outplay them up front, which
    they should with their superior talent and size, then IU cain win with
    good shooting and execution.
    
    You're so right about the emotion surrounding Bob's appearances in
    Crisler, and that'll be a big factor, especially with a young team
    where emotion is so important.
    
    Don't count Iowa out - most underrated squad in the country.
    
    MrT
15.828AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhere's Roger?Wed Feb 26 1992 12:334
    	Indiana's ranked #2!  They've been playing so many perfect games
    maybe we should call this a perfect season!
    
    				/Don
15.829ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewWed Feb 26 1992 15:387
    Cake it, smart-ace.  How cain IU be better than UCLA, who stomped
    them on a neutral floor, and with twice as many losses?  These
    polls are stupid but important (seeds, recruiting, TV exposure),
    but IU is a long-shot for the Final4 and probably has no business
    in the Excellent8.  [nocenternofrontlinedepthspottyoutsideshooting]
    
    MrT
15.830PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Feb 26 1992 15:482
    .829 sounds to me like someone who has had enough of the big, black
    bird. ;^)
15.831SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Feb 26 1992 15:512
       Nah Mac, just his usual sandbaggin'.
                                          Denny
15.832AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhere's Roger?Wed Feb 26 1992 16:275
    	Sandbaggin'?  What he's doing is worse.  He's spinning more
    than a 45 at a Sock Hop!  Indiana is #2 in the nation.  Anything
    less than a Final Four appearance is SnuffmeisterLikeGaggin'!
    
    				/Don
15.833No rewarding IU regular season IU underachievement this season! :^)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Feb 26 1992 17:568
    MrT just sent me mail indicating that, due to obvious weaknesses and
    talent shortfalls, reaching the round of 16 should mark this a
    successful year for the Hoosiers.
    
    Just thought y'all would want to know,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.834CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RWed Feb 26 1992 18:017
	T's problem is that he thinks all the other teams have no problems
	themselves.  It is true that IU has some problems, but it seems to
	me that all the other teams have problems as well, which T seems to
	forget.  IU deserves their #2 ranking at this point, and if they
	win their home games, and beat Michigan on the road, they'll be a
	#1 in the NCAA's and anything less than a final four spot would be
	underachieveing (just like last year, BTW).
15.835JENEVR::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Feb 26 1992 18:1110
    
    Indiana as #2 is pushing it, they just happened to win a big game the
    same week that lots of teams in the top 10 lost. There are probably
    more teams that can win the NCAA's this year then usual. So even if a
    team has a #1 seed in a regional, not getting to the final 4 does not
    necessarily mean underachieving this year. The one possible exception
    to that is Duke.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.836BSS::JCOTANCHWed Feb 26 1992 18:134
    Indiana barely moved into the #2 spot, edging out Kansas by 1 vote. 
    Both IU and KU received 7 first-place votes.
    
    Joe
15.837AXIS::ROBICHAUDWhere's Roger?Wed Feb 26 1992 18:284
15.838Michigan still dazed ???SHALOT::HUNTStop! Or Stallone Will Act Again ...Thu Feb 27 1992 16:473
 Wisconsin oughta fire their coach more often !!!
 
 Bob Hunt
15.839ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewThu Feb 27 1992 18:0021
    Lookit, the Hoosiers fell behind a not-great Kaintuck team, in
    Indiana, by 18 pts. and then came back to save face losing.  They
    got blown out on a neutral court by UCLA.  They got blown out on
    the road by Michigan State.  They were handled by a non-tourney
    team Minnesota on the road.  
    
    This is not the mark a a great team.  Especially considering what
    the analysts have noted repeatedly now:
    
    		notruecenternofrontlinedepthshakyoutsideshooting.
    
    With the knowledge and prep time available to Bob in the Big10 he
    cain squeeze the last drop out a these guys.  When he goes into the
    tourney they're a 2nd rank squad behind the likes a Duke/UCLA/Arkansas/
    Kansas/Zona.
    
    That's just the way it is.  Don't blame *me* for joe inability to deal
    with Reality!
    
    MrT
    
15.840IU '92 -- Dance Fever ???SHALOT::HUNTStop! Or Stallone Will Act Again ...Thu Feb 27 1992 18:1815
15.841duke excuses already ?DTIF::MCEVOYThu Feb 27 1992 18:222
    Duke is very beatable with/without injuries. Michigan gave them the
    game back in Ann Arbor when Duke was at full strength. 
15.842I'm comin' round to MrT's way a thinkin'AXIS::ROBICHAUDGreenwell talks, Roger balksThu Feb 27 1992 18:235
    	No way Bob!  If Indiana can win it's first round game it will
    be a tribute to what an Xcellent coach Bob Knight is!  Anything
    after that qualifies as miracle material!
    
    				/Don
15.843Ain't an excuse ... just realitySHALOT::HUNTStop! Or Stallone Will Act Again ...Thu Feb 27 1992 18:4012
15.844How 'bout some Objective Proof?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Feb 27 1992 19:079
    > is *easily* the best coach in the ACC
    
    Bob, would you mind posting CoachK's head-to-head record against Dean
    Smith for confirmation of this.  Assuming you don't find it fair to
    compare overall records cause K took over a floundering program, how
    'bout just the last five (5) years?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.845STRATA::CAPPELThu Feb 27 1992 19:2616
    
    Re -1
    
    This will prove the following:
    
    1: If Dean has won more games against Coach K than it clearly shows
       that Dean is an underachiever as Duke has made the final four
       so many times in that span and that Coach K is a superior coach.
    
    2: If CoachK has won more games against Snuffy, than it clearly shows
       that he is a superior coach and Snuffy is an underachiever.
    
    Since this is a no-win situation for the Snuffster why put yourself
    through such misery?  If you want to continue to do so than please 
    provide your answers on why Dean has been the better coach over the
    last 5 years.  
15.846DTIF::MCEVOYThu Feb 27 1992 20:0714
    Duke has a good team, no doubt, but they are not heads above the 
    rest of the country with or without injuries. If they were, they would
    not have had the close calls that they did. 
    
    The best team in the country will win the NCAA tournament. If that's 
    Duke, then great, but it won't matter whether or not they had injuries.
    
    I'm hoping for one of the lower seeds to take it this year; I really 
    think there is enough balance for it to happen.
    
    we'll see, I can't wait, for me, the NCAA tourney is the Sporting Event of
    the year!
                     
    -dennis
15.847Simple question.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Feb 27 1992 20:078
    Let me get this straight.  When comparing two (2) coaches it's more
    fair to use NCAA Tournament results (defined as 'Number of Times They
    Reached The Final 4') than head-to-head results.
    
    True?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.848you are kidding, right???JENEVR::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Feb 27 1992 20:2217
    re: .846
    
    >  The best team in the country will win the NCAA tournament.
    
    Utterly ridiculous. The best team in the country does not always win
    the NCAA unless your definition of the best team is solely based on who
    won the NCAA tournament.
    
    NC State was no the best team in 1983, Villanova was not the best in
    1985, I don't think Duke was the best in 1991. All 3 teams won the NCAA
    tournament. Of course the best team occasionally does win, NC in 1982,
    Vegas in 1990, maybe Indiana in 1987, Georgetown in 1984.
    
    fyi: I may have some of the years mixed up, but you get the idea.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.849Believe me, I'm not lobbying for change.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Feb 27 1992 21:008
    Correct, Met.  As has been documented, the best team very rarely wins
    the NCAA Tournament.  I don't think this detracts from the
    accomplishment in any way, but if we really wanted to select the best
    team we'd only invite a few teams and let them play a best-of-7 series,
    NBA style.  (**BORING!!**)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.850ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 28 1992 01:2340
    >This is the same problem Bob had in '87 .
    
    No way.   In '87 Bob had a long-armed 6-11 true center in Dean Garrett.
    Granted, he wasn't all that talented, but he could block and change
    shots and board and fulfill his role.  '87 Hoosiers also had a number
    of other front-line players who were vets, big people who could set
    picks and play D and hit the open J.
    
    Not so this year.  '92 Hoosiers have a 195 lb frosh fwd at center, a
    good fwd in Anderson, a great small fwd in Calbert... and then nobody
    to play even a role on the big-time level.  In fack, the only sub they
    have for the front-line is the awful Matt Nover.  Frosh Todd Lindemann
    coming into a hotly contested game would be a_unmitigated disaster. 
    He'll be redshirted next year.
    
    Big diff between '87 and '92.  '87 had balance; '92 doesn't.
    
    re: Last two
    
    The best team seldom wins?  Duke was clearly the best last year.  Ditto
    for the Runnin' Rabble year before last.  I've done this routine before
    (deep breath): UCLA was almost always clearly the best their 10 champ
    years when they dominated recruiting totally and were so well coached.
    Kentucky was the creme de la creme when the Robey/Givens/Phillips team
    won.  Same for IU in '76, maybe the best *team* ever, and in '81 when
    they coalesced late and swept through the tourney rolling over a tough
    bracket setting the record for widest avg tourney winning margin that
    still stands (Landon and Ray Tolbert and Isiah were just too much).
    
    Michigan was the best in '89, the most talented. TRue, it took the
    firing a a stupid coach to allow them to take their Title, but that's 
    the key: Those "best teams" who didn't win were usually coached by the
    likes a a Jim BayWhine or Lou HitSome.
    
    Also on the "best team Titleist" would be the '81 Carolina team and
    the Gougetown team.
    
    Add '84 to the stumblebum category, they were the best awright...
    
    MrT
15.851ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 28 1992 01:3023
    Add to the best team Titleist roster both a Denny Crum's squads,
    not to mention the David Thompson team.
    
    The thing is this: In some years, most in fack, it takes a tourney
    to prove who's best cuz the thing starts with 3-5 teams in a class.
    In some years there's a outstanding squad whom everybody sees winning.
    
    This year Duke's the best, but they're not outstanding from the creme
    de la creme.  My creamy Title group this year would be:
    
    Duke
    Arkansas
    UCLA
    Kansas
    Zona
    
    Then you drop to your B-teams, the Okla States and Indianas and
    Star Hells and the like.
    
    Then the C-teams, who in this parity year could win It All, like 
    Gougetown, Michigan State, Iowa, Missouri, and similar ilk.
    
    MrT
15.852AUNTB::ROSSMrT smells like Teen SpiritFri Feb 28 1992 02:3511
    MrT, sandbagging again... Indiana will be underachieving if they fail
    to reach at least Final 8.    
    
    For those of you who care to listen to IU on the radio, I have been
    able to pick them up loud and clear at 1190 AM all the way down here
    in South Carolina.    Bob Knight's radio call-in show is a trip.  Last
    week he could be heard rummaging around in his trash can {he does the
    show via phone from his office} looking for a stat sheet.... just left
    the air for about two minutes. 
    
    
15.853AXIS::ROBICHAUDMoVaughn-RogainePosterChildFri Feb 28 1992 11:213
    	If UCLA is cream, it's definitely sour cream after last night.
    
    				/Don
15.854DTIF::MCEVOYFri Feb 28 1992 11:439
    re .848
    
    NC State was the best team in 1983 
    Villanova was not the best in 1985 
    Duke was the best in 1991
    
    that's why they play the tounament. That's why polls don't always tell
    the truth.
    
15.855Do I see Da Lite ?LUNER::BROOKSSoftware : Art Of The StateFri Feb 28 1992 12:528
    re .842
    
    Slasher, let's see if I get this right ... Indiana is incapable of
    underacheiving right ?
    
    All wins are due to the genius of Coach BobCat ?
    
    Doc
15.856AXIS::ROBICHAUDMoVaughn-RogainePosterChildFri Feb 28 1992 12:565
    	Absolutely Doc, one visit with Ms. Odorgaard and your anti-Hoosier
    sentiments will be history.  I'm on the bi-weekly schedule.  She
    has shown me the value of BobKnight discipline.
    
    				/Don
15.857LUNER::BROOKSSoftware : Art Of The StateFri Feb 28 1992 12:567
    re .854
    
    You have got to be doing SPORTSrooms if you *really* believe that
    NC Skate was superior to the Coogs in '83.
    
    The Coogs were the best team not to win a title in NCAA history (thanks
    Guy Lewis ...:-( ....
15.858JENEVR::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Feb 28 1992 13:038
    re: .854
    
    In a one game crapshoot teams can pull an upset.
    If Duke-UNLV in 1991 or Houston-NC State in 1983 had played a best 
    of 7 I would put my money on UNLV and NC State winning the series.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.859RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSeinfeld roolz!Fri Feb 28 1992 13:3617
    For the most part, the best team does win the tourney.  DOn't forget,
    that the '6th' man of those teams is the coach.   Take Houston vs. N.C.
    State.  Yeah, Houston *may* have had the names - but think about N.C.
    state's team.  They had talent - and Valvano was a far superior game
    coach than Lewis.  Don't forget what plagued the Cougars in thier
    failures - foul shooting was very bad - and coaching.  Akeem was still
    pretty unpolished, and no where near the force he became in the
    tourney.   I think both teams were closer in talent than most folks
    think.
    
    The Cougs came close, and lost.   It ins't like they had a
    Perkins/Jordan/Daugherty type lineup and got beat, afterall...
    
    And even if Bob does underachieve this year - so what - he's still
    light year's ahead of the master underachiever down there at UNC.
    
    JD
15.860ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 28 1992 14:0618
    re: Midnight and /Roachy in the peanut gallery
    
    What happens to the Hoosiers in the tourney will have nothing to do 
    with Bob's greatness, which he has already established over a period
    of 20 years.
    
    Say what you will, but joe all is anti-sandbagging.  The Hoosiers 
    show all the signs of a team playing at maximum, occassionally
    breaking down and ending up 18 behind a Kaintuck, 14 behind a Minny,
    25 behind Michigan State, or 28 behind UCLA.
    
    They're good but not great.  Too thin up front, and it shows.  The
    script here sez they'll run into a 3-5 seed with big quick people 
    who'll shooting 50% and outrebound them by 10-15 and block several
    shots and change even more... IU could get blown out by such a team.
    
    MrT
     
15.861Anti-sandbagging?AXIS::ROBICHAUDMoVaughn-RogainePosterChildFri Feb 28 1992 14:081
    
15.862Same goes for Dean, BTW ...CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RFri Feb 28 1992 14:1421
>   They're good but not great.  Too thin up front, and it shows.  The
>   script here sez they'll run into a 3-5 seed with big quick people 
>   who'll shooting 50% and outrebound them by 10-15 and block several
>   shots and change even more... IU could get blown out by such a team.
    
    As you say, they could be blown out by such a team.  Of course, it could
    happen because they weren't prepared to play that team, or because they
    had a bad game plan.  Let's face it, if a team is the #2 ranked team in
    the country, it didn't happen by accident, and with proper preparation
    and motivation, should be able to beat a team that is perhaps a little
    more athletic but has weaknesses that have been exploited more often
    and more easily by other teams than the nation's #2 team has.  And that's
    the point:  IU has weaknesses, but so does everyone else, and the fact
    is that everyone else's weaknesses have been even more easily exploitable
    than Indiana's.  With proper preparation and game coaching, IU should be
    able to beat teams not as highly ranked as they are, and would have to be
    considered underachievers if they are upset in the tournament.

    And, as you say, such an upset wouldn't have any bearing on Bob's past
    triumphs.  It would be a reflection, to some degree, on his coaching of the
    current team, however.
15.863BSS::JCOTANCHFri Feb 28 1992 14:1424
    I don't think the best team usually wins it.  With a 7-game series the
    best team usually would win it (see NBA), but with the 1-loss
    elimination format things are much less predictable.  Ask yourself if
    these teams would've won it if they were playing best-of-7:
    
    NCState in '83
    Villanova in '85
    Kansas in '88
    Duke in '91
    
    Answer: No way.  But that's what makes the tourney great.  Compare it
    to the upcoming NBA playoffs - the only suspense is whether anybody can
    get 2 wins against the Bulls in a series. (BTW, anyone who thinks Duke was 
    flat-out a better team than Vegas last year is high).
    
    Even years like '89 you can get a couple semi-darkhorses in the
    championship game.  Weren't Michigan and SEton Hall both #3 seeds?  I
    know for a fact that hardly anyone gave Seton Hall a chance to even come out
    of the West that year with teams like Arizona and Indiana making it to
    the West Regionals.
    
    
    Joe
    
15.864Anti-sandbagging ... whatta hoot.SCNDRL::HUNTThree little birds sit by my doorstep ...Fri Feb 28 1992 14:2611
There's no doubt that the Hoosiers *could* get blown out at any time in the 
Big Dance.   None whatsoever.   But when they're on and playing Bob's 
system to perfection, they can go a long, long way.  I think they will this 
year.   They've shown enough brilliant flashes to convince me that they'll 
make a run.   I think Bob knows it too.

Could I be wrong ???   Absolutely, but I'll feel comfortable knowing that 
I'll still be light years behind a certain Baby Blue Prognosticator in the 
Prediction Boo-Boo Department.

Bob Hunt
15.865LUNER::BROOKSSoftware : Art Of The StateFri Feb 28 1992 15:0324
    Bob, let's not take the heat off of MrT. ACChris will screw quite well
    on his own - don't let T divert the heat off of his rather sizeable
    arse.
    
    re JD
    
    JD, the Coogs had (H)Akeem, Drexler, Young, et al ... man for man (yes,
    down at least 8 deep) - I'd stack the 82-84 UH teams against ANY club
    in NCAA history.
    
    However, I (unlike a couple of noters in here) will freely admit that
    Guy Lewis was worth about 5 points a game ...
    
    
    To the opposition. That man couldn't coach a dog to roll over and play
    dead ! And I never meant to imply that NC State was talentless. Valvano
    was (and is) slime, but he's a good coach. That team and some unreal
    outside shooting with Wittenburg, Gannon, Myers, and Lowe. And Thurl
    Bailey's NBA career underscores his play in college.
    
    But there is no way in hell they should have been within 10 points of
    UH on 8 nights out of 10 (at least).
    
    Doc
15.866ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 28 1992 15:4527
    
    Ok /Roach, *reverse*-sandbagging.
    
    And Rolly, say what you will but show me another top ranked team that
    only has one big-guy sub, and a guy who received few offers out a H.S.
    and has an abject inability to handle the ball or shoot.
    
    Most top teams have several big guys (Zona must clone them).
    
    Knight himself has noted that this team "has gaping holes to be
    exploited."  He's talking about the fack that Indiana is the only top
    30 team in the country who has only three Div. I-A players along the
    front-line.  They use Nover to spell the three and they suffer for it.
    After that they go to a 3-guard lineup.
    
    And, beyond that, of the three front-line guys (Calbert, Alan, Eric)
    none is strong physcially in terms of rebounding and defending.  If
    IU's gonna have a thin front-line they need a Jamal Mashburn type to
    even things out a bit and they don't have that.
    
    If Alan plays like he did at OSU they could win the Title.  The
    slightest letdown and they could get blown out by a 5-seed.
    
    Not so for Duke/Arkansas/Zona/UCLA/etc, cuz they have the pieces to
    play with.
    
    MrT
15.867Reverse-Sandbagging?AXIS::ROBICHAUDMoVaughn-RogainePosterChildFri Feb 28 1992 15:571
    
15.868I agree, IU may underachieve in the NCAAs in 1992.CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RT's Anti-Reverse-Sandbagging AginFri Feb 28 1992 16:119
	No doubt about it, T, Indiana has some problems.  I never said
	they didn't; in fact, in each of these notes I have admitted they do.
	I expect good teams to exploit some of those weaknesses if they
	can.  However, everyone else has weaknesses, too.  A lot of these
	NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS have a very undisciplined, playground sbrand of
	basketball, and the teams depending on athleticism have plenty of
	holes, too.  If BK has his team prepared, and if he has a good game
	plan, IU's superior basketball skills will beat the team that may
	have a couple of NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS on the front line.
15.869ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 28 1992 16:4929
    IU may underachieve?  
    
    Well, they've proven they can handle the nukewidebodystud squads last
    year when they went down by 18 to FSU and then took over.  However, 
    doing that all depends on whether the shots are falling for a team like
    that.  
    
    >If BK has his... and if he has a good...
    
    You really do agree: If if if.  Too many ifs for them to be second 
    ranked, much less a money shot at the Cup than, say, Arkansas.
    
    This is cuz there are some nukewideobdystud squads who are NOT 
    undisciplined or stupidly coached.  Meanwhile, the Hoosiers have a
    very thin situation up front, and a history for drawing blanks from
    the perimeter.  They must continue to improve rapidly and have some
    luck in the tourney to have any shot at the Final4.  My point is that
    this needn't be said for several teams ranked behind them.
    
    One other thing: That they're ranked 2nd now doesn't mean they'll be
    ranked 2nd going in.  They must play at Iowa and Michigan (not to
    mention Purdue, talk about heated rivalries) and have some tough games
    at home.
    
    Given that they've been either perfect or on the ropes, the Hoosiers
    bubble could snap (kinda like strutting one's chest) and they could
    lose maybe three games and end up going in ranked 15th.
    
    MrT
15.870re .867, yeah, I said reverse-sandbaggin so what?ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 28 1992 16:501
    
15.871AXIS::ROBICHAUDMoVaughn-RogainePosterChildFri Feb 28 1992 17:326
    	I humbly apologize MrT.  I should've realized you know just
    about everything regarding sandbagging.
    
    	You do so much of it!
    
    				/Don
15.872if that were true I'd agree with joe point!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewFri Feb 28 1992 18:451
    
15.873I'll takes T's word, IU not coached well enough...CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RT's Anti-Reverse-Sandbagging AginFri Feb 28 1992 19:4722
>  <<< Note 15.868 by CSCOAC::ROLLINS_R "T's Anti-Reverse-Sandbagging Agin" >>>
>            -< I agree, IU may underachieve in the NCAAs in 1992. >-
>
>	             If BK has his team prepared, and if he has a good game
>	plan, IU's superior basketball skills will beat the team that may
>	have a couple of NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS on the front line.

>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Note 15.869                    Big Ten Basketball                     869 of 872
>ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Carolina Blew"                  29 lines  28-FEB-1992 13:49
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>    >If BK has his... and if he has a good...
>    
>    You really do agree: If if if.  Too many ifs for them to be second 
>    ranked, much less a money shot at the Cup than, say, Arkansas.
    

     Too many ifs (count em, 2) to be second ranked.  I guess T is saying that
     it's really questionable as to whether Bob can really prepare his team
     AND have a good game plan, both at the same time against a good team in
     the NCAAs.  Seems to me that's the only qualifications I put on the win,
     but T says thats Too many ifs.  I guess he'd know, however.
15.874NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 02 1992 13:2925
    > Let me get this straight.  When comparing two (2) coaches it's more
    > fair to use NCAA Tournament results (defined as 'Number of Times They
    > Reached The Final 4') than head-to-head results.
    
    NCAA tournament results (times to the Final 4, Final 8, whatever; with 
    emphasis placed on championships won) are more "fair" and definitive 
    than head-to-head results in the regular season.  NCAA tournament play 
    is almost universally recognized as the goal and of the highest caliber 
    in college basketball.  I'm sure you can come up with all sorts of
    strange results using head-to-head comparisons between all the coaches
    in college basketball, or even within a conference (like Bob Knight's
    troubles with Gene Keady, for example).
    
    Given the statistical uncertainty of the results in any single year
    (not over a 30-year period, for example), I'd say that Indiana is
    underachieving if they fail to reach the Final 16, is a disappointment 
    if they fail to reach the Final 8, and a success if they reach the 
    Final 4.  There are too many teams at a very close level this year to
    expect much more than that from any team (again, with the possible
    exception of the defending champs)...
    
    glenn
    
    
15.875this week is itANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Mar 02 1992 15:5722
    A_enigmatic performance by the Hoosiers at home against the undermanned
    Illini.  Outrebounded by 10, they have a 22 point lead with 6 minutes
    to go and it turns into a nailbiter.  Sloppy defensive play by the guards
    against the trey late.
    
    The good news is that Calbert continues on his tear, Alan has settled
    into a groove in the middle, and Eric ACTUALLY hit 4 of 8 jump shots!
    
    It's Title Week for the Hoosiers.  Noted biased-Hoosier-sandbaggers
    Bill Walton and Ted Robinson spoke at length about IU's weakness
    defensively inside - the lack a a true center and front-line depth and
    front-line muscle.  
    
    Robinson wondered what Bob could do against a team with the big main
    and Bill correctly observed, "we'll find out this week, the Hoosiers
    are going to visit Acie Earl and then Chris Webber."
    
    Right he is.  We'll finally see what the Hoosiers are made of this
    week.  And don't forget they finish up at that snakepit Mackey Arena,
    which is no gimme.
    
    MrT
15.876SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Mar 02 1992 16:122
       Who cares about how the Loosiers played. How was our commercial?!!
                                        denny
15.877wondering when somebody would axe...ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Mar 02 1992 18:295
    Bob's Pizza Hut campaign has been running for a few weeks now.  
    
    IMNSHO it's a danged fine commercial!
    
    MrT
15.878AXIS::ROBICHAUDRogerWatch-Day10Mon Mar 02 1992 18:345
    	You have to give Bob credit where credit is due.  Although he
    was tempted, he *didn't* throw a chair yesterday.  Congrats Bob
    on showing such restraint.
    
    				/Don
15.879How about DEC ad?SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Mar 02 1992 18:432
       Isn't Boob selling Dominos pizza?
                                     Denny
15.880AXIS::ROBICHAUDRogerWatch-Day10Mon Mar 02 1992 18:464
    	Yeah I thought it was Dominos too.  Pizza Hut puts out a quality
    product.  Dominos pizza tastes like sauce and cheese on a tree bark.
    
    				/Don
15.881Papa Gino's Rooles!!!!!!7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Mon Mar 02 1992 18:551
    
15.882SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Mar 02 1992 18:563
       That's because the hot rodders that deliver it have to store it in
    the car's engine compartment ta keep it warm!
                                      Denny
15.883Pizza Hut is betterFRETZ::HEISERstop making sense!Mon Mar 02 1992 19:254
    It looks like Bobby has been sampling a few too many from his new
    employer.
    
    Mike
15.884DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Mon Mar 02 1992 19:595
    Trivia Question:
    
    Why didn't Bob throw the chair yesterday?
    
    WILDCAT
15.885Won't go far nowCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Mar 02 1992 21:1513
    Trivia Question:
    
    Why didn't Bob throw the chair yesterday?
    

	Correct answer:  He's much too much a fine and upstanding citizen
		         to do such a thing (again).

	Answer you're probably looking for:  The chairs are now tied down;
			have been for, oh, about 7 years now.

tom
15.886They weren't playing Perdue?RAVEN1::TURNERA'64ToplessTripower4-SpeedGTOtogo!Mon Mar 02 1992 21:241
    Bad Back?
15.88714 down, 4 to go; 3 to tie, 4 to winCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Mar 02 1992 21:2621
	Hoosiers played another of their far too frequent 10 minute games
yesterday.  For that 10 minutes, they looked as good as any team I've seen
this year.  For the other 30, they looked more like #52 than #2.

	Cheaney continues to play well, but the real story on the good news
side is Alan Henderson.  Not sure how this idea that he wasn't aggressive
got started his senior year in high school, but those responsible should never
be allowed to comment on high school players again.  Henderson, right now, is
as tenacious on the boards and defensively as anyone who's played for IU in
years.  

	The bad news side is the guard play.  Since he's been inserted in the
lineup Greg Graham seems to be becoming steadily less effective shooting the
ball, Bailey gets more chances to go one-on-one(this is bad), Reynolds has been
ineffective coming off the bench, and Meeks seems confused in what's become 
limited playing time.  I know it's tough to keep the guy who's playing best
for you in a sixth-man role, but I wish they had.

	Next up: Wednesday at Iowa.  Always a tough place to play.

tom
15.888ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewTue Mar 03 1992 01:3228
    You have it right, Tom.  The Hoosiers need two things to happen
    going into the meaningless-end-a-season-peak time:
    
    1) GGraham to rediscover his outside J.
    
    2) Eric Anderson to rediscover his outside J.
    
    Ya gotta figure Alan will continue to progress, Calbert will continue
    to roll, and that the inconsistent shooting of Damon and the rest is
    inherent in the squad.  Ditto for the sometimes laggardly guard defense
    on the ball and the alway suspect inside D and rebounding.
    
    But no way cain they have a shot at a regional title without one good
    shootin guad and a finesse forward who's their biggest guy wihtout the
    shot that carried him for 3 years.
    
    Iowa, then Michigan, then Purdue.  Three tough road games.  We'll see
    what they're made of.
    
    One thing I like is watching all these Almost Close and Big Least games
    and they're reduced to talking about the joy over winning the "regular
    season conference championsip."
    
    At least we have something substantive to shoot for, win or lose.
    
    Bring 'em on!
    
    MrT
15.889fire fisher before the tournament...DTIF::MCEVOYWed Mar 04 1992 11:5928
    Michigan played well for much of the game last night at Columbus,
    but in the end, they couldn't finish it off once again. They were up
    by 5 with about 5 minutes left, and they proceded to throw the ball 
    away three times in a row for 3 OSU breakaways. OSU coasted from there.
    
    Fisher continues to show no control over this team. He just lets them
    play. If they're hot, as they were at Iowa, then this strategy does 
    allright. But it does not cut in in the close games. The three turn
    overs happened in about one minutes time. Fisher should have stepped
    in to get some control before they let it slip away. Fisher did get
    mad (first time I've seen it) arguing a substitution call, I was hoping
    he'd get tossed and let Watson coach the team.
    
    Anyway, it was exciting as usual. Webber had a 360 breakaway jam. Ray 
    Jackson played well in the first half, he had a pretty alley-oop, and
    some nice rebounds. This guy is quite an athelete. Rose was ice cold,
    he must have missed close to 10 3 pointers. But he did have some nice
    passes. Both Webber and Howard were posting up and passing nicely.
    
    I'm hoping Howard finds his shooting touch again for the IU game. He
    does a nice job of posting up, but he's been missing of late.
    
    I'll stick with my original prediction, UM over IU sunday. I think
    Indiana will win tonight, and end up tied with OSU for the big ten and
    get the number 1 seed.
    
    -dennis        
     
15.890wish I could've watched this gameOLDTMR::RACZKAsweet and saxyWed Mar 04 1992 13:5810
    RE: .889
    
    dennis,
    
        Thanks for the update ... what was the final score ??
    
        I too believe that Perry Watson will replace Fisher at
        some point
    
    chris
15.891ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina Blew? They SUCKED!Wed Mar 04 1992 14:1411
    Why does everybody underrate Iowa so?  They're ranked 40th!  They could
    beat up a dozen a the squads ranked over them.
    
    On Ohio State: JJ showed his "G" string last night.  What'd he git,
    13 rebounds?  What a player.  Didn't see the game but the key, I think,
    is whether the Buckeyes ran a organized offense.  If and when they
    start doing that with consistency they've got a shot at the Title,
    and are still on the inside track for at least a tie for the Big10
    Title.
    
    MrT
15.892DTIF::MCEVOYWed Mar 04 1992 16:045
    Michigan ended up losing by 10 I think. JJ was superb, numerous
    jump shots with defenders right in his face -- he is a class
    act all the way, he'd be a great choice for the Olympic team.
    
    
15.893ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina Blew? They SUCKED!Wed Mar 04 1992 19:055
    IU vs. Iowa ain't on the boob tube tonight.  Bah.  Everybody's
    skeert a Acie.  No, they ain't skeert a Acie's tri-level hair-do,
    it's his inside game that has all a Hoosierdom fretting!
    
    MrT
15.894Just like on their journey to the Final 8NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 04 1992 19:146
    
    I predict that the Hoosiers will win with room to spare but their lack
    of an inside game will be horribly exposed nonetheless...
    
    glenn
    
15.895ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina Blew? They SUCKED!Wed Mar 04 1992 19:279
    Chris Street has been coming on up front.  And you never know whether
    Moses is gonna uncork one a his unconscious perfmances.  They've got
    that lightning quick little guard (Jackson?), but he's been spotty.
    
    Hope Dr. Malpractice commits everything to that stoopid full-court
    press, which the quick Hoosiers should go over 'round and thru with
    much impunity.
    
    MrT
15.89615 down, 3 to go; 2 to tie, 3 to winHANEY::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsThu Mar 05 1992 01:3826
	Gutty performance by the Hoosiers tonight in Carver-Hawkeye to hold
on to a 64-60 win.  IU trailed 10-2 early but closed the gap quickly and it
stayed pretty much even the rest of the way.  36-33 Iowa at the half, but
after the lead moved to 5 on the first play of the second half Cheaney scored
a quick 8 points to bring the Hoosiers back to even, where it pretty much
stayed till the final 3 minutes.  Cheaney left the game with 4 fouls with
about 11 minutes left, but Greg Graham stepped up big-time and was the 
difference the rest of the way.  He had 14, all in the second half.

	Cheaney finished with 29 on 13-17 shooting.  The rest of the team was
something like 12-39 from the field.  Acie Earl was a force defensively,
but pretty much a non-factor offensively.  Iowa did the majority of their
damage outside, with 7 3s.  Eric Anderson may have disappeared on the 
offensive end, but he's become a force on the defensive end.  12 boards 
tonight, and exceptional defense on Earl.  Saw an article that said in
the 7 games leading up to the second Illinois game, Anderson had the defensive
assignment on Peplowski(twice), Deon Thomas, Earl, Bob Martin, Kevin Rankin,
and Lawrence Funderburke.  He's smaller than all of them, and their average
production was something like 11 points, 6 rebounds, and 40 percent shooting.
Don't know if he can hold up through the next 3 then the tournament, but he's
been a real force defensively for (at least) 9 games in a row.

	Next up: Michigan on Sunday in Ann Arbor.  Another tough challenge.

tom
15.897CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsThu Mar 05 1992 12:3412
    OK IU hoots,
    Give me yo thoughts the Hoosier-Baby Wolverine matchup on Sunday.
    Will Chris Webber tear IU's frontcourt a new a#$hole?  How bout
    Juwan? I watched the earlier matchup at SnakepitU and Michigan
    looked downright scary at times. Cain these still_wet_behind_their_
    ears 'rines pull off a 5-10 pt win? Or will IU's outside shooting
    and Cheaney's matured athleticism make the infants wish they were
    wearing Depends ?? Be honest dudes ( especially you T 8^)).
    
    Inquiring gray matter and all that rot,
    MikeL
    
15.898New technique for Pay-Per-WRHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Mar 06 1992 14:4814
    Seems Big10 member Wisconsin contacted Georgia State coach Bob
    Reinhart about one_a_them payoff games next year.  The Badgers were
    offering $18K for Reinhart to bring his Panthers to Madison next
    season.  (i.e. Buy_a_W)
    
    Reinhart turned down the 18 grand, but did offer a different policy. 
    He said they'd play for $1,000 p/ point.  If Wisconsin beats Georgia
    State by, say, 50, they owe 'em 50 grand.  If GSU beats Wisconsin, they
    owe nothing.  
    
    Sounded reasonable to me, but Wisconsin hasn't gotten back to him.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.899ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYYou are incapable of shameFri Mar 06 1992 15:5920
    Crocker, did you know that ALL visiting teams get paid to appear?
    And YOU are hardly in a position to be bleating about "buy_a_W" 
    after "your" Star Hells cupcake gorging jag this year.
    
    re: Iowa game
    
    Huge win for the Hoosiers.  This should position them for hopefully
    at least a share.  It also enhances their chances at Crisler given
    the confidence building that should flow from it.
    
    Did I hear that Eric played center and checked Acie all the way?  His
    floor game (blocks, inside D, even rebounding) has flourished the past
    month, and he's even avoiding foul trouble.
    
    Again, we'll see how viable this set-up is against the Fab5 on Sunday.
    Plenty a big guys to test oneself against.  
    
    The Hoosiers win at Michigan they win the Big10.  Bring 'em on !!
    
    MrT
15.900RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Mar 06 1992 16:4419
    re: .-1
    
    You tellin' me ALL visiting teams get offered 18K to appear?  I doubt
    it.  
    
    Anyway this type of Pay-Per-Win is commonplace and fair.  Why shouldn't
    the "haves" (i.e. schools bringing in megabucks) share with the
    "have-nots", specially when you consider the opposition has every right
    to share gate receipts.  (Even if everybody is payin' to watch 'em get
    slaughtered, kinda like the team the Globetrotters used to play ...)
    
    BTW, Georgia State ain't that bad.  They made the NCAA's last year (got
    absolutely keeled by Arkansas in the first round).  They've got a kid
    named Luckydoo who may be an NBA prospect.  Course he's graduating this
    year, which is no_doubt why the Badgers felt bold enough to invite 'em
    up for a win.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.901ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYYou are incapable of shameFri Mar 06 1992 18:414
    So now paying a team is routine and GSU ain't all that bad.  We'll
    just assume you were only kidding first time 'round on this...
    
    MrT
15.902Truth and I are old company. RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Mar 06 1992 19:085
    Kidding about what?  I was reporting the truth, something I realize is
    a foreign commodity to U.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.903ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYYou are incapable of shameFri Mar 06 1992 19:2110
    You backed of.  You said UW was buying a W, then, when challenged
    by a big strong dude making a point, you backed down and abjectly
    admitted that everybody gets paid and GSU could probably beat UW
    anyway.
    
    I.e., you were kidding?  Or is it, in saying that you weren't kidding,
    you are for the first time in joe life finally admitting that you were
    WRONG?
    
    MrT
15.904Wrong? Not likely ...RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Mar 06 1992 19:359
    > You said UW was buying a W
    
    True, but you're overly sensitive Bigot10 persona naturally assumed
    that this implied a criticism.
    
    Not so.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.905NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Mar 06 1992 19:4115
    >> You said UW was buying a W
    
    > True, but you're overly sensitive Bigot10 persona naturally assumed
    > that this implied a criticism.
    
    > Not so.
    
    That's the way I read it, too, Chris, based on your astonishment over
    the amount of the dollar figure (which isn't really all that much) and
    the way you presented Wisconsin's non-response to what amounted to an
    illegal wager...
    
    glenn 
    
15.906Astonished? Hardly.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Mar 06 1992 19:467
    I wasn't astonished at the 18K glenn.  Only that MrT equated that 18
    thousand with the normal amount that a visiting team gets.  I doubt
    very much that Wisconsin would pay, say, Duke University $18,000 to
    play a game on their home floor.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.907ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYYou are incapable of shameSat Mar 07 1992 16:397
    I disagree.  I think UW would gladly pay Duke eighteen grand to
    come up and play.
    
    Spin control it however you like, but you backed down after making
    a false claim, and that's good.
    
    MrT
15.908ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Sun Mar 08 1992 19:4713
    re: .899
    
    Yo T-man, Michigan was brought on and wupped Indiana's butt. Hell of a
    coaching job by whats that guys name at IU?? Anyway they were pretty
    much outplayed in every phase of the game, in addition to not being
    able to buy a basket for minutes at a time. A very enjoyable game if I
    do say so. 
    
    Will be interesting to see if IU or OSU get a #1 seed in the NCAA
    tournament.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.909go blue!DTIF::MCEVOYMon Mar 09 1992 12:1126
    Great Win for the Wolverines!
    
    Michigan came out hot but they let Indiana back into it. Actually
    I think Indiana did a good job of pushing Webber and Howard further
    out on the post. Great game from Jimmy King especially with the much
    needed offense in the first half, and a great all round effort from
    Webber. Webber is going to be All American, he's got all the tools.
    
    UM was letting things slip away at the end of the first, then they came
    out ice-cold in the second half. Credit to Fisher and the boys for
    coming back after being down. I wasn't feeling too comfortable when
    they fell behind. But they finally started hitting again, and we're
    able to hang on. Indiana could not hit a free throw at the end, I think
    Knight will be talking to his boys about that.
    
    Of course the play of the game was the alley oop from Howard to Webber
    at the start of the game, just like old times... when they were beating
    up on the cupcakes at the start of the year, Michigan was getting a few
    of these every game.
    
    This should wrap up a tournament bid. I'm afraid they won't get too
    far this year, but its just great to see them back in it. They've got
    the potential to beat anyone on a given day, but I can't see them winning
    3 in a row.
                                   
    -dennis 
15.91057112::ASHESometimes you're a windshield...Mon Mar 09 1992 15:251
    Send them to Worcester!!!
15.9116984::CHILDSFour Tops &gt;&gt; TemptationsMon Mar 09 1992 15:526
 sure send em. given a choice I'd rather have OSU come to worcester so I
 can see JJ in person....then of course the General again. Maybe we'll get
 lucky and get two Big Ten teams here. We always get atleast one.

 mike
15.912A few thoughts on tourney time28922::QUINN_RTue Mar 10 1992 02:1941
    Send the wolve's to the Southeast.  I say them play a few years  back
    at the omni when the had  Grant,  Tarpley and a frosh by the
    name of Rice.  Packer mentioned it Sunday and it may be due to being so
    young.  The UM players appear to be much more focused for games that
    have been built of over time.  You can't really count on it but the
    ncaa tourney can't be an ultimate buildup.  Isn't coach Steve
    undefeated in the "Big Dance"???
    
    Tourney Possibilities:
    
    IU -- History says all the way or out early(Round 2). Achilles heel
          outside shooting not size.  Its been proven you can win without
          size.  When the outside shooting is on the efficiency to way up.
    
    OSU -- Recent history has yielded poor results.  Well coached but poor
    	   timing.  They always appear to peak before the tourney. 
           Execution and someone to step forward along with JJ to get them
    	   to the final 4.
    
    MSU -- Jud seems to do better when he is least expected to do so. 
           Along with Minnesota history says they overachieve in the
           tourney.  Final eight with a good seed and the right bracket.
    	   Shot selection and Stieninga(sp?) are keys.
    
    UM -- I hope they watch the tapes of the last UM trip to the big dance.
    	  Young but so was Duke when they made the trip to the final 4 the
          last 2 years.  Great potential this year could be just a learning 
    	  experience.
    
    Iowa -- For their talent level they could get to the sweet sixteen. 
            Dr. Tom has blown a few.  The press is great if you have
            shooters his has been suspect.  Earl could be a factor.
    
    Minn -- NO tourney lock for sure-- big bubble may be burst by the end
    	    of the weekend.  If they get in look out.  Consistent
            overachiever.  Seton Hall like if you will.  Good D no great
            shooting but they don't let you shoot well either.
    
    Bring on the DANCE !!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Roy
15.913for thos who haven't guessed, toungue-in-cheekACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Mar 10 1992 13:3215
    This morning I fell like a disappointed puppy. Let me explain.
    Yesterday I got in to this notesfile expecting to see at least a 50
    line post from the T-man about the Indiana-Michigan game on Sunday. In
    it I expected to at least read how IU was really playing at the level
    they should be playing and how they have overachieved all season. The
    clincher would be the line that THAT COACH (hereafter known as TC) was
    a genius for managing to keep his team within 10 points of the awesome
    Wolverines. Alas, yesterday there was no note. So I figure give T-man
    one more day, since this note would be a tough task even for a man of
    his eloquence and verbosity. But here it is a day later and still no
    note. T-man is beginning to behave like some ACC fellow. Sigh, is
    nothing sacred anymore.
    
    The Crazy (and disappointed) Met
    
15.914ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Mar 10 1992 14:0727
    re 2 
    
    Size matters when you give up 15 offensive rebounds.  A lot.  It also
    matters in terms of your shooting percentage if you're going up against
    a relatively quick 6-8 guard and the front-line sizeable fellows are 
    all cat-quick too.
    
    re 1
    
    I couldn't get into this file yesterday AM ("node unreachable") and was
    in meetings the remainder a the day.
    
    I'll say this now, though: Bob has done a masterful job a keeping his
    team at or near peak efficiency through motivation, player development,
    game preparation, game coaching, and so on.  But they blew the game by
    shooting miserably even when they had the open Js, and nailed their own
    coffin by missing four straight front-ends of 1-and-1s down the stretch.
    
    Bob cain only do so much.  He cain't play the games for them.
    
    Good news: Alan Henderson has served notice that he should be first
    team All-Frosh.  Bad news: Eric's awful shooting continues unabated,
    and Damon must be the most inconistent player in the country.
    
    Poor MrT
    
    
15.915ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Mar 10 1992 16:144
    Thanks t-man I'll sleep better tonight.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.916GOOEY::MCEVOYWed Mar 11 1992 18:412
    you have to give Knight his due; give that team to Fisher or Henson and
    they'd be down there fighting with Illinios.
15.917ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Mar 11 1992 21:397
    re: .916
    
    I knew someone would say somethin like that eventualy. Just thought
    that t-man would be the first.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.918Slim Pickens must wins SundayCELTIK::R_QUINNThu Mar 12 1992 12:133
    
    Woe is Minny!!!! Big Dance sliding away.  Boilers bidding ado(sp) as well.
                                                     
15.919ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Mar 12 1992 15:216
    Looks like both Minny and Purdue are tap city.  Maybe Purdue cain
    nudge in by chumping the undermanned Hoosiers at Mackey Sunday.
    
    Five Big10 squads to the tourney.
    
    MrT
15.920AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Mar 12 1992 15:335
    	I'll bet that either Minnesota or Purdue will make the dance
    and it wouldn't surprise me if they both did.  Undermanned Hoosiers?
    HAHAHAHAHAHOHOHOHOHOHEEHEEHEEHEE!!!
    
    				/Don
15.92116 down, 2 to goCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsThu Mar 12 1992 21:3628
15.922AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Mar 13 1992 11:271
15.923a bad winANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Mar 13 1992 12:447
    A disquieting win for the Hoosiers against the lowly Badgers.  They're
    at home in a must win game against a weak team not exackally revered
    for its defensive prowess... and they shoot for the lowest percentage
    in team history.  They pull anything approaching that against Mene
    Gene's minions in Mackey and they're daid-meat.
    
    MrT
15.924C'mere, sis, osculate me ...SHALOT::HUNTVirginia -- 1992 ACC Women's Hoops ChampsFri Mar 13 1992 12:467
 Gosh, the suspense in the Big Ten is just killing me.   
 
 After all these many months, we might have two teams with equal records
 sharing the conference title.   Oh, what tension !!!    How can you stand
 it ???
 
 Bob Hunt
15.925NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Mar 13 1992 14:338
    
    A tie is a perfectly acceptable result in a fair and equitable
    competition.  Unless, of course, you prefer the ACC/BigEast/Big8 
    equivalent: throw out the results of the competition, tie or no, 
    and let them shoot penalty kicks!
    
    glenn
    
15.92634873::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Mar 13 1992 18:4212
    re .924
    
    Witch, apparently you cain no longer fathom wending your way through
    a 2 1/2 month comptetion.  That's your loss.
    
    Enjoy your phony redundant money-grubbing weekend spectacle (which you
    say THRILLS you so); just remember that what happened the previous 
    three months is, how you say, a_exhibition season.
    
    What made-for-TV crap it all it.
    
    MrT
15.927Go Eastern Illinois!!ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Mar 16 1992 13:156
    Big time choke for Indiana yesterday. They had the lead and a #1 seed
    playing near home in hand but couldn't winb the game. A satisfying
    SUnday.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.928ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorrMon Mar 16 1992 13:2726
    A not particularly surprising loss.  A tough rivalry against a tough
    coach in a snakepit a a arena.
    
    As the announcers gushed about how Craig Riley was the key cuz a his
    inside offense and widebody I had to laugh at the sandbagging I've 
    been abused with over the years from that reprehensible manipulator
    Doug Ross (Purdue alum and ex-Big10 main).
    
    Indiana is surely one a the worst shooting teams in the nation.  I
    never saw so many wide open squared-up mid-range jumpers missed.  Check
    that, I've seen as many missed in several other Indiana games.  But
    when they're going up against a team with some inside presence they
    cain't fall back on the drive-for-fouls tactic and they lose.
    
    The Hoosiers are a small, poor shooting team.  They should lose in a 
    blowout to LSU in the 2nd round.  Shack will be on a mission and the
    centerless Hoosiers lack a depth along the front-line will pay.  Their
    only hope is the extra-dumb Dale Brown.
    
    Yesterday's loss hurts most cuz it cost a Big10 Title, something
    Indiana may not again be in a position to win for some years.  It also
    hurts cuz it was Purdue.  The seeding and the NCAA was beside the
    point, cuz they don't have the horses to make a serious run at the
    thing.
    
    MrT
15.929RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGo Fordham Rams!Mon Mar 16 1992 13:328
    I tell ya one thing, Nick Anderson better find his shot, or the
    Hoosiers are home early.  He clanged big time yesterday.  Henderson
    looked and played like a frosh.  Lets hope that he got his bad game out
    of his system.  
    
    Could see the Shack vs. the Hoosiers in the 2nd round...
    
    JD
15.930ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorrMon Mar 16 1992 13:3927
    
    
    
    Eric Anderson hasn't been able to shoot all season.  I think maybe 
    Alan was a bit intimidated by the game (a really big rivalry) and 
    the rough play.  Wait till he gets a load a Shack.
    
    Indiana has one shooter in Calbert.  After that their next best 
    shooter is Greg Graham, who was known for his bricklaying prowess
    even as an all-state prepster.  Alan cain shoot some, at least he has 
    lately.
    
    Then you have the total abject non-shooters, talented players with
    no J at all: Chris Reynolds, Jamaal Meeks, and Damon Bailey.  I'd
    include the awful Matt Nover here but he has no talent.
    
    The injury to sharp-shooter Pat Graham was more costly than imagined.
    They'll be better next year with him and Pat Knight and Brian Evans,
    who apparently cain shoot some.
    
    I think the Hoosiers need to run more and slash inside more on the
    halfcourt offense.  Their outside shooting is nearly hopeless. 
    
    They had a good season but missed their shot at the Title when they
    lost at Gophers.
    
    MrT(ears)
15.931If we put T's nonsense aside and look at the truthCSCOA1::ROLLINS_RMon Mar 16 1992 13:5434
First Round:

#2 Indiana 23-6				#15 Eastern Illinois 17-13
---------------				--------------------------
C  Eric Anderson    6-9 Sr  10.5 ppg	C  Curtis Leib      6-7 So   8.6 ppg
F  Alan Henderson   6-9 Fr  11.1 ppg	F  Barry Johnson    6-7 Sr  14.0 ppg	
F  Calbert Cheaney  6-6 Jr  17.5 ppg	F  Dave Olson       6-6 Sr  11.3 ppg
G  Chris Reynolds   6-1 Jr   4.5 ppg	G  Kavin Martin     6-3 Sr   4.6 ppg
G  Damon Bailey     6-3 So  12.2 ppg	G  Steve Rowe       6-2 Sr  15.0 ppg

Second Round Possibilities:

#2 Indiana 23-6				#7 Louisiana State 20-9
---------------				-----------------------
C  Eric Anderson    6-9 Sr  10.5 ppg	C  Shaquille O'Neal 7-1 Jr  23.9 ppg
F  Alan Henderson   6-9 Fr  11.1 ppg	F  Clarence Ceasar  6-7 Fr  11.7 ppg
F  Calbert Cheaney  6-6 Jr  17.5 ppg	F  Vernel Singleton 6-7 Sr  14.6 ppg
G  Chris Reynolds   6-1 Jr   4.5 ppg	G  Jamie Brandon    6-4 So  11.0 ppg
G  Damon Bailey     6-3 So  12.2 ppg	G Maurice Williamsn 6-0 Jr   7.3 ppg

#2 Indiana 23-6				#10 Brigham Young 25-6
---------------				----------------------
C  Eric Anderson    6-9 Sr  10.5 ppg	C  Gary Trost       6-10 Jr 14.5 ppg
F  Alan Henderson   6-9 Fr  11.1 ppg	F  Kevin Nixon      6-9 Jr  11.4 ppg
F  Calbert Cheaney  6-6 Jr  17.5 ppg	F  Jared Miller     6-8 Jr   7.4 ppg
G  Chris Reynolds   6-1 Jr   4.5 ppg	G  Nathan Call      5-11 Sr  9.3 ppg
G  Damon Bailey     6-3 So  12.2 ppg	G  Mark Helsop      6-5 Sr   9.7 ppg

The truth is, Indiana should beat EIU and either LSU or BYU.  LSU's only
area in which they are stronger is at center.  The IU forwards and guards
match up favorably to LSU's, and IU is deeper than the Tigers.

If a person really looks at the matchups, IU would be underachieveing if they
don't get to the Western Regional finals.
15.932Brown is a 100% bonafide idiot.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 14:0313
    re: LSU vs. Bob
    
    This is one game where I'd like to see:
    
    o IU clock LSU
    
    o Bob clock Dale Brown.
    
    Is there any doubt whatsoever that Dale Brown is the biggest jerk in
    college coaching?  Not in my book ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.933IU Chokes #1 seed away.....STRATA::CAPPELMon Mar 16 1992 14:2112
    Indiana choked big time yesterday... No way they should have lost to
    that Purdue squad.  They better break out of this shooting slump soon.
    
    IU should make the sweet 16, if they shoot over 50% they have a shot
    at another title this year.  Anything less and they are history...
    
    I didn't get to see the game as I was center court in the Gahden to
    see another installment of Larry's Legends.  What a great experience.
    
    I wouldn't want to be at this week's practices, maybe this loss will
    give them a shot in the arm....
    
15.934Depressing, VERY depressingCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Mar 16 1992 14:5719
	Unfortunately, and most disturbingly for Indiana's chances in the
tournament, yesterday's loss at Purdue WASN'T a choke.  They played exactly 
the same way they've played essentially every game since the second Ohio 
State game.  No outside shooting at all, and no ability to shut a team down 
with the game on the line.

	The Hoosiers should handle Eastern Illinois, but the only way they beat
LSU is if the outside shooting makes a (miraculous) comeback.  If they can't 
handle Craig Riley on the defensive end, they don't have a prayer against 
Shaquille.  And even as bad a coach as Brown will figure out that he can just
pack it in to keep Shaq out of foul trouble.

	Interesting that IU and LSU are once again in the same bracket.  The 
NCAA's been trying to give CBS this matchup pretty much every year since the
'87 tournament controversy.  Looks like they may have finally succeeded, unless
the Hoosiers get lucky and LSU looks past BYU.

tom
15.935Some constant themes year-to-year in NCAA Tourney ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 15:0916
    re: .-1
    
    What's this, MrObjectiveAnalysis Cap, who can brilliantly second guess
    a HoFer, erred saying Indiana "choked"?  (Despite his own admission
    that he didn't see the game.)  Cain't belive it.
    
    
    re: IU vs. LSU
    
    It's amazing to me the trends that take place year to year with the
    brackets.  Carolina has gone to the Southeast to play either Michigan
    or Alabama at least 5 times since the early 80's.  It's almost like
    they use a template to put the brackets together ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.936ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorrMon Mar 16 1992 15:1930
    re .931
    
    I'll just go ahaid and agree with any number of commentators on the
    Hoosiers' apparent lineup weakness: They don't have a center, they
    don't have a single physcial front-line player, and they only have
    3 bigtime college front-liners, and have only one front-line subsitute.
    
    This has been gone over again and again.  It's even in the summary in
    today's Mpls. paper, "poor shooting and weak inside."
    
    I'm sure you're right and everybody's wrong, Rolly, but it was plenty
    apparent how Indiana managed to give up 12 offensive rebounds to 
    Michigan.
    
    There's more to a player than his height: weight, quickness of jump,
    height of jump, quickness, speed, muscle, and so on.
    
    IU has one great player on its squad, the small fwd Calbert Cheaney.
    Then they have a 190 lb superfrosh at big fwd, and a slow no-shot
    no-jump fwd playing center with his back to the basket who everybody
    knows is only halfway effective facing the basket.
    
    They have no effective sub up front.
    
    The Hoosiers are a small, poor shooting team.  A deadly combination,
    and certainly not a #4 squad that'll roll over Shaquille, who could
    block 12 shots and change several and grab 20 boards and, most
    important, get Indiana's shallow front-line in early foul trouble.
    
    MrT
15.937ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPinnochio,Nixon,Bakker,ChrisKnorrMon Mar 16 1992 15:3317
    Interesting point, tom: The standard strategy against Shack is to foul
    the hell out a him.  Indiana has lotsa fouls to give from the guard
    position, but no fouls to give from the front-line.  
    
    The only positive I took from yesterday's (Big10 Title) loss was that
    Eric was able to play the brutish Craig Riley for a full game that was
    very rough and not, as he had in the past, ended up in early foul 
    trouble.
    
    You gotta figure he's gonna get in early foul trouble against Shack
    and hit the pine with about 10 minutes left in the first half (this
    was the pattern for Eric up till this year)... and then you've got
    Matt Nover vs. Shack - The Matchup From Hell!  
    
    8^o
    
    MrT
15.938STRATA::CAPPELMon Mar 16 1992 15:5024
    >What's this, MrObjectiveAnalysis Cap, who can brilliantly second guess
    >a HoFer, erred saying Indiana "choked"?  (Despite his own admission
    >that he didn't see the game.)  Cain't belive it.
    
    This is from the same guy who can second guess a HOFer(Knight) but is
    aghast when anyone question's Dean Smith(including experts).
    
    Yes IU choked away the Big10 title after being in the driver's seat.
    They should have beaten both Minnesota and Purdue but clearly were
    not focused to do so....
    
    This is a team that has a huge problem, without an inside presence,
    they have to shoot perfectly from the outside to win ballgames.  Knight
    has done a great job in perfecting the offense so that they have
    makeable 12-15 footers, unfortunately they have not hit the shots.
    
    IU is a well-coached team right now(as shown by their strong defensive
    efforts and minimal offensive mistakes) and could make a strong title run 
    if they hit their shots.
    
    NC however showed strong signs of being a poorly coached team in their
    recent 3-6 showing(Terrible defensive effort, huge turnover #'s, etc.)
    Clearly their season must be deemed a disappointment....
    
15.939Commentators agree: Both IU and UNC have severe weaknesses.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 16:1912
    Ah yes, here we have more B-grade Objective Analytical work by Mr. Cap.  
    IU loses the B10 Title yesterday yet Knight has an extraordinarily 
    well-coached team.  Carolina plays its guts out over the weekend, 
    knocking off Wake and Florida State before falling to what can only 
    be described as an awesome Duke squad and our season's a huge 
    disapointment.  Presumably you consider Indiana's season a success.
    
    Keep it up (!), and while you're at it, how 'bout some Objective Analysis
    about all of Dean's horrid coaching moves during yesterdays Duke game?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.940ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ BayouMainMon Mar 16 1992 16:2426
    >Yes IU choked away the Big10 title after being inthe driver's seat.
    
    I don't buy it.  They seemed to be in the driver's seat only cuz 
    they played such a pud 1st half, i.e., all their tough games at home.
    
    They lost to Minny cuz the Golden Goofs play very tough defense from
    the guard position, and with big guards of the type who send Damon
    to the bench pronto.  And it's in a noisy snakepit.
    
    They lost to Purdue cuz the Spoilermakers cuz they have the big inside
    presence and play an offense nearly as optimized as Bob's.  And it's in
    a noisy snakepit.
    
    Four league losses with this squad is plenty good.  They didn't choke
    so much as begin playing the tough road games after game nine.  When
    you have the paucity a permiter power that these guys have shooting 
    under 40% from the field is to be expected.
    
    When they were up by 10 I called it, figuring that it was only a matter
    a time before that great little guard Woddy Austin caught fire.  He
    did, and that was that.
    
    The only good news for me this weekend was learning that I'm in Executive 
    Suite #117 for the Final4...
    
    MrT
15.941UNC :== Major Disappointment (Outside Chapel Hill)SHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Mon Mar 16 1992 16:3312
15.942please, do not /Roach out on meANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ BayouMainMon Mar 16 1992 16:465
    re 1
    
    Excuse me again, buddy, but your p_name is out a specification.
    
    MrT
15.943Most important games still lie ahead folks ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 16:5319
    Never said this years Carolina team was a huge success (though compared
    to the results of your beloved Wahoos I'd certainly put it in that
    context).  Fack is, this team played pretty darn well except for a
    horrid two (2) week stretch in February, during which they had the
    misfortune to close out the season with 5 outa 7 games on the road. 
    For a young team like Carolina, that proved to be too much.  Confidence
    waned and the results were predictably disasterous.  To their credit
    though, they've gotten off the mat to win 3 out 5.  (Both L's coming to
    Duke.)
    
    As to preseason expectations, I look no further than your soul mate
    Doug Ross, who correctly pointed out how incredibly slow and
    un-talented UNC was this year.  He went so far as to say the 20-win
    streak would die, the Top 20 finishes would end, and the Sweet 16
    streak would extinguish.  Based on his metrics you'd have to say Dean
    has overachieved nicely to this point.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.944C'mon, T, I'm paying it off ...SCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Mon Mar 16 1992 16:587
15.945Bah (continued) ...SCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Mon Mar 16 1992 17:0825
15.946STRATA::CAPPELMon Mar 16 1992 17:1429
Just in case you missed this one Chris.....I see you cowardly hid from 
it in the ACC note.... :-)
    
              <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 17.3716          Atlantic Coast Conference Basketball          3716 of 3729
STRATA::CAPPEL                                       19 lines  16-MAR-1992 12:39
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I still haven't seen a note from ACChris concerning his absolute
    ridiculous statements concerning Walt Williams(not being known
    by NBA Coaches, scouts, etc.).  Not even a single comment on how
    stupid that comment was??? :-)
    
    Plus did anyone else noticed how quickly he shut up when given hard
    evidence that he called Charlotte's pick of Larry Johnson the right
    pick and that they shouldn't have picked Mutombo.  Not even an
    admission of error????
    
    Plus he's on the Virginia underachieved bandwagon but fails to point
    out how miserably UNC has underachieved this year.  Talent-wise they
    were a top-5 team with no holes and a supposed superior coach.  Instead
    they end the season 3-6 after an 18-3 start.  Dean must be thanking
    his lucky stars that he scheduled his regular 7-10 cupcakes again this
    year.                 
    
    And he has the gall to call himself objective....
    
15.947Simply put, you're wrong.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 17:149
    Best know your facts before speaking so boldly Ketch.  Virginia's
    horrid road trip thru North Carolina last year was set up strictly 
    as the result of the Cavs desire to get in an extra non-conference game.  
    (Notre Dame, whom they barely beat.)  On the other hand UNC had absolutely 
    no control over their season-ending schedule - it was handed to them
    and not modified.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.948Still waiting for the critique of Dean's weekend coaching ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 17:1914
    re: .946
    
    For the record I was on the Larry Johnson bandwagon at least as early as
    BobHunt.  Up until recently it appeared that was a mistake.  Now I'm
    not so sure, although the crook Westhaids obvious explotation of
    Mutombo is certainly not helping the kid.  
    
    As to Walt Williams, you've misquoted me so badly it's hardly worth
    pointing out.  Did I say nobody would know about Williams?  No.  Only
    that going to Maryland was a mistake and cost him money, which is an
    opinion I'll admit can't be proven or disproven.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.949re: Chris' lastedSCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Mar 16 1992 17:2820
    Trackin' down these mistruths a chris's could be a full-time job!
                                  Denny
    
              <<< CAM::$1$DUA5:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 17.3665          Atlantic Coast Conference Basketball          3665 of 3731
28964::KNORR "Graphics Workstation Support"          10 lines  13-MAR-1992 13:29
           -< Walt in Carolina Blue.  Ooo, it woulda been *sweet*! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    No I ain't busted Waugamain.  I said *I'd* take him at #2.  I seriously
    doubt he'll go that high.  If he'd_a gone to UNC his fundamentals would
    be better, his shot selection better, and every man, woman, and child
    in the USA woulda heard of him, to say nothing of every owner, agent,
    coach, and scout.               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    Humbly yours,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.950TV exposure == money in Faintastic NBARHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 17:457
    re: .-1
    
    If every man, woman, and child in the USA has heard of Walt Williams,
    then I stand humbly corrected.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.951Only the true believers can ride this bus !!!SHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Mon Mar 16 1992 17:5219
15.952You meant *that* Walt Williams? Never mind...JARETH::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Mon Mar 16 1992 17:539
    re .950:
    
    > If every man, woman, and child in the USA has heard of Walt Williams,
    > then I stand humbly corrected.
    
    oh yeah, I remember him...wasn't he the baseball player with no neck? :-)
    
    
    py
15.953Not denying your point on IU's front line BTW...CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RMon Mar 16 1992 17:5620
	T, I'll admith that IU does not have a physical front line.	
	Shaq should dominate at the center position.  In fact, if LSU meets
	IU, Shaq could have a field day if IU goes man-to-man, which they
	probably will.

	However, IU should have the advantage at every other position.
	If you don't think so, then tell me which of LSU's other players
	is better than Indiana's equivalent player.

	LSU's outside shooters are even worse than IU's have been lately,
	and that should continue.  LSU isn't a very good defensive team,
	either, as compared to IU which plays a very good defense.

	Shaq should have a great game, and IU should win.  I haven't seen
	any commentators suggest otherwise, even though they may also claim
	that IU is a poor-shooting, undersized team.  Tell me, T, which of the
	prognosticators you read who describe IU as you do also claim that IU
	should lose to LSU, should they meet ?

	
15.954DUGROS::ROSSD-o-u-gMon Mar 16 1992 17:569
    Hey, MrT, which of IU's frontline players {Henderson, Cheaney, or
    Anderson} would Purdue's center Riley start ahead of if he played for
    IU?
    
    In the long line of Purdue's NUKEWIDEBODYDUDS {Russell Cross, Jim
    Rowinski, Stephen Scheffler, Craig Riley}, Riley is a distant fourth.
    He's about three steps slower than Montross with half the heart.
    
    -dr {exBiG10 Bigot, now ACC Acolyte}
15.955FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Mar 16 1992 17:5621
    NBA scouts, management and coaches will find a good player no matter
    where he is.  If Walt Williams is going to end up being a #1 draft
    choice, then Maryland was the right choice for him if that was what he
    wanted, although perhaps with less notoreity and definitely with fewer
    wins while he was in college.  Being the number 1 draft choice is
    something bankable, the college fame and the memories are not.
    
    Now, if Williams had wanted to play in a top-notch college program and
    get more notoreity, then North Carolina would have been a better
    choice.  The tradeoff would have been - would he have still be a #1
    choice had he been a Tar Heel?  No one can answer that question.  You
    can say that he would have won more games in his college career and had
    been more noticed by the average college basketball fan had he gone to
    Carolina.
    
    Williams did the right thing, though the payoff won't be known until
    June.
    
    John
    
    There were no guarantees for Williams going into college.  
15.956ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ BayouMainMon Mar 16 1992 18:2722
    Raftery was drooling over Riley after having watched the films.
    Drooling just like MrT started to drool after watching him coming
    on with the strong inside O last year.
    
    Riley could play in the NBA if he'd just quit making the non-stop
    stupid OTB/reach/stumble fouls, so he's going nowhere.  But he's
    a huge mountain a a main with moves and a sweet shot who boards ok
    for his massive size and much better than either Hoosier.
    
    To answer: Based on the past two months Eric would be coming in off
    the bench to spell either Craig or Alan.  Or, more likely, Eric would
    start and Bob'd roll Alan off the bench to spell any a the front-liners,
    which with his quickness he'd be able to do.
    
    Rolly, I'm not saying Indiana has no chance against LSU.  In fack, with
    dumb bunny coaching they could win.  But their miserable shooting and 
    susceptibility to front-line foul trouble up front combined with the
    fack that Shack is gonna be on a mission from Allah in this game if I
    were a betting main I'd lay the 3 points or whatever it is and ride his
    Herculean back to the winner's window.
    
    MrT 
15.958RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGo Fordham Rams!Mon Mar 16 1992 18:5412
    
    So, taking the Walt Williams 'mistake' to a logical end.  Did Michael
    Jordan make a mistake going to UNC?  It cost him millions, as he was
    only the #3 pick in the draft.  Playing for the square peg, round hole
    team from Chapel Hell, Jordan's talents were not displayed enough - not
    featured enough, to let him leapfrog over Sam "ow, my laig" Bowie and
    the #1 pick?  If Jordan had gone to a school that allowed him to be THE
    MAIN MAN for his tenure - the star - and put up numbers more in line
    with his pro performance, wouldn't have been drafted higher, and
    consequently, signed  a rookie deal more lucrative...
    
    JD
15.959Can't do better than be PoY, no matter where you play ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 19:2012
    re: .958 
    
    Your logic ain't bad JD, but don't discard the fact that the two (2)
    NBA execs who failed to pick Jordan just plain blew it.  After all,
    Michael not only played for a team on TV as much as any in the country,
    and not only played for a coach long regarded for his success in
    turning raw high schoolers into NBA bread-winners, BUT, ... Michael was
    recognized by the entire USA as the #1 collegian in the country!  (i.e.
    Collegiate PoY)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.960In anticipation of LSU vs. IURHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 19:247
    I wanna go on public record as stating that I will NOT debit Bob's 'Moral
    Woes' statistic if he should feel the need to clock Dale Brown.
    
    Just wanted to say it.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.961ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ BayouMainMon Mar 16 1992 19:2510
    Which brings us back to that troubling question you've evaded for
    years now: If SuckSmif' is so danged good at moulding "raw talent"
    into NBA "breadwinners" how does that conflict with winning Titles?
    
    Jordan went third cuz he was viewed as a an excellent role player type
    with good skills but not a great body.  In other words, his awesome
    talent was NOT showcased cuz it wasn't used, which perhaps also
    explains why an unstoppable player such as Michael won ony one Title.
    
    MrT
15.962Deja Vu all over again ???SCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Mon Mar 16 1992 19:386
If Bob Knight could shut down His Airness in 1984, why cain't he shut down 
His Shaqitude this year ???

Hmmmm ???

Bob Hunt
15.963Must be both lucky and good.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Mar 16 1992 19:418
    There's certainly no conflict in molding raw HS talent into NBA
    breadwinning material, but there's also no one-to-one correlation
    between having good players and winning Titles.  As has been proven
    many, many times, the best team in the country usually does not win the
    Russian Roulette known as the NCAA Tournament.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.964NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 16 1992 20:0422
    
    > There's certainly no conflict in molding raw HS talent into NBA
    > breadwinning material, but there's also no one-to-one correlation
    > between having good players and winning Titles.  As has been proven
    > many, many times, the best team in the country usually does not win the
    > Russian Roulette known as the NCAA Tournament.   
    
    And which has been refuted many, many, times as completely irrelevant
    and totally ignorant of statistical theory.  To wit, as the number of
    opportunities go up (particularly chances late in the tournament 
    fielding talented teams), the probability of multiple championships go 
    up.  Does 1-for-30 overall and 1-for-8 in the Final Four look better 
    or worse than the expected, break-even performance?
    
    Those are pathetic numbers unless, of course, you can prove the
    ridiculous notion that not only does the best team not usually win but 
    that the best teams are actually underdogs and at a disadvantage, i.e. 
    that it's a burden being stocked with top-notch talent in the NCAA 
    tourney, rather than a blessing...
    
    glenn
     
15.965So easy to shoot down....STRATA::CAPPELMon Mar 16 1992 20:3753
    >As has been proven
    >many, many times, the best team in the country usually does not win the
    >Russian Roulette known as the NCAA Tournament.
     
    Boy was I waiting anxiously for this statment from ACChris.....    

    Since college polls are purely objective it would be a safe assumption 
    that the best team in the country is one of the top 8 seeds in the NCAA
    tourney.

    So taken that into account I did some research over the last 32
    years(sound familiar Chris) and found that 72% of the time a #1 or
    #2 seed(one of the top 8 teams) won the tourney.  If you add the #3
    seeds(who could clearly be the best team in the country that just got off 
    to a bad start as IU did in 1981) than the percentage rises to 87% of
    the time.  Only 3 times in the last 32 years did a seed lower than #4
    win the Tourney(NC State, Kansas and Villanova)

    Tourney winners summary:

    	#1 Seed: 16 wins
    	#2 Seed:  7 wins
    	#3 Seed:  4 wins
        #4 Seed:  1 win
    	#6 Seed:  2 wins
        #8 Seed:  1 win

    Also when a #1 did not win the tourney, a #1 seed lost in the final
    9 other times, making 25 of 32 years that one of the 4 best teams(and
    possibly best team)made the final game.

    The funny thing is that prior to this year, Snuffy has made the tourney
    in 21 of the 31 years as a coach.  His seedings for the tourney were
    as follows:

    		#1 Seed: 10 times
    		#2 Seed:  5 times
    		#3 Seed:  5 times
    		#8 Seed:  1 time

    So 15 of his 21 appearances, Snuffy has had a golden road to the final
    4 and could only come up with **ONE** title.  This is particularily
    humiliating to NC fans since NC has had more raw talent than any other 
    program over the last 20 years.

    No wonder he's made the sweet 16 so often, it's easy when your heavily
    favored to do so and have all that talent.  The hard part comes in
    actually winning championships once you've gotton there....

    Cap

    
15.966Pre-emptive strike to stop the spinning from ACChrisSTRATA::CAPPELMon Mar 16 1992 20:3930
    Because I know ACChris will start spinning like a top after reading my 
    previous note, I'll ask him to pick out in what years was it clear that
    the best team in the country did not win the tourney.  Here are the
    champs:

    60 Ohio State	71  UCLA	82  NC
    61 Cincy		72  UCLA	83  NC State
    62 Cincy		73  UCLA	84  Georgetown
    63 Loyola		74  NC State	85  Villanova
    64 UCLA		75  UCLA	86  Louisville
    65 UCLA		76  Indiana	87  Indiana
    66 Texas Western	77  Marquette   88  Kansas
    67 UCLA		78  Kentucky	89  Michigan
    68 UCLA		79  Mich. St	90  UNLV
    69 UCLA		80  Louisville  91  Duke
    70 UCLA		81  Indiana     

    Please list who was clearly the best team in the years in question: My
    own opinion says that clearly Kansas, Villanova, NC State and Marquette
    were not the best teams in the country in the years that they won.

    Georgetown in 84(North Carolina had one of the greatest teams of the
    last 50 years) might be added to the list but they were 34-3 that year.

    So possibly 5 of the last 32 winners were clearly not the best team
    in the country.  The remaining champions had very impressive records
    and teams.

    Cap
    
15.967RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGo Fordham Rams!Mon Mar 16 1992 20:395
    Cap -
    
    But that #8 seed was a very overachieving club.  ;-)
    
    JD
15.968!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Tue Mar 17 1992 01:298
    Cap,
    I'm impressed!!!!!
    
    and I applaud your deadly "fatal shot".
    
    WOW,
    Kev
    
15.969SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesTue Mar 17 1992 11:183
       Another 'slam dunk' for Cap. Dang he makes it look so easy don't
    he?!
                                        Denny
15.970small nitACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Mar 17 1992 12:416
    I'll add Duke in 1991 as not being the best team in the country. A good
    team, absolutely, one of the best sure, but UNLV was clearly the best
    team in the country in 1991. In a 7 game series Vegas in 5 or 6.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.971SASE::SZABOTue Mar 17 1992 12:4510
    Very impressive replies indeed.  And, nothing "weaselish" about it. 
    Not a thing....
    
    BTW, as a casual college hoops fan back when Jordan played at UNC, the
    1st and only time I've ever noticed him was during the championship
    game.  I suspect that only the die-hard college hoops junkies really
    knew anything about him (ie. that he had talent)...
    
    Hawk
    
15.972NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 17 1992 12:5319
                                           
    Nice work, Cap.  You put a lid on any possible future use by Chris of 
    the exception to logic I outlined below:
    
    > Those are pathetic numbers unless, of course, you can prove the
    > ridiculous notion that not only does the best team not usually win but 
    > that the best teams are actually underdogs and at a disadvantage, i.e. 
    > that it's a burden being stocked with top-notch talent in the NCAA 
    > tourney, rather than a blessing...
    
    While the best team does not always win and maybe doesn't even usually
    win, what you've proved is that in general, over the long haul, the
    cream does rise to the top, consistent with statistical theory.  Dean 
    Smith has been in it for the long haul with said top-notch talent, and 
    therefore has no excuses of the "bad luck" variety that Chris is fond of
    using.
    
    glenn
    
15.973STRATA::CAPPELTue Mar 17 1992 12:5514
    
    I would agree if UNLV had been upset earlier and not beaten by Duke.
    However Duke was clearly one of the best teams in the nation and proved
    that they were a better team than UNLV.  The two teams were close in
    talent, had good coaches and were clearly the best two teams in the
    nation last year.  I don't think a clear argument can be made that
    UNLV was clearly a better team than Duke was last year.
    
    If Kansas had won the title instead of Duke or some other team than I 
    would say that clearly the best team did not win the title.  But I see
    no evidence pointing to the fact that UNLV was clearly better than
    Duke.
    
    
15.974Lest we forgetSHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Tue Mar 17 1992 12:5714
15.975STRATA::CAPPELTue Mar 17 1992 13:094
    Good point Glenn,
    
    Didn't even realize the vast implications of this study and your 
    evaluation just made it so much sweeter... :-)
15.976Ya gotta have standards...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 17 1992 13:1226
15.977STRATA::CAPPELTue Mar 17 1992 13:2722
    
    Glenn,
    
    Weren't Loyola and Texas Western only considered underdogs because
    they mainly featured black players and many experts during that time
    thought that black players played an undisciplined and unintelligent
    game.  I know Loyola started 4 black players which was basically
    unheard of in those days(in fact there were a few southern teams that
    pulled out of the NIT and NCAA during the late 50's, early 60's rather
    than play a team with a black player) and that Texas Western started
    5 black players against all-white Kentucky.  Both Loyola and Texas
    Western proved the experts of the day wrong by playing a disciplined
    and intelligent style of play.  Particularily impressive was Loyola's
    28-2 record in 63 since when playing in the south, the black players 
    had to deal with the racial tendencies of those times(different hotels,
    resteraunts, etc).  
    
    Also Loyola was the #3 ranked team in the nation the year that they won
    and Texas Western was #2(28-1 record).  Without the racial prejudices
    of the day, both teams might have been considered favorites.
    
    Cap
15.978You fanned on that one, big guySHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Tue Mar 17 1992 13:3315
 You missed my point.  It has nothing to do with the NCAA Tournament and
 whether it's watered down or not.  
 
 The 83 NC State Wolfpack speaks for the ACC Tournament, Glenn.   The 83
 Pack was the ACC Champion and got into the NCAA's on that basis alone.  
 The conference sent its champ and the champ brought home the national
 champeenship in return for the favor.    
 
 If memory serves, the NCAA was *not* capped at 64 teams in 1983 (1985 was
 the first 64 team year).  In 1983, they were still giving first round byes
 to the top 4 seeds in each region, I believe.   But it doesn't matter,
 even if the NCAA's only invited 32 or 16 teams, the 83 Pack was going and
 they can thank the ACC Tournament for that.   That was my point.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.979Still a great storySHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Tue Mar 17 1992 13:3914
15.980History as it has played out does not justify itself...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 17 1992 14:0129
    
    I don't know about Texas Western, but Loyola was definitely an underdog, 
    Cap.  Maybe not as big as an NC State or Villanova, but they took down
    mighty Cincinnati, which was gunning for its third straight
    championship.  Rallied from something like 15 down in the second half
    to do it, too.
    
    Bob, I didn't miss your point at all.  NC State justifies the ACC
    Tournament only if you accept the fact that what the regular-season
    champ or other deserving teams accomplished over 25+ games and what
    those teams might have done in the tourney is irrelevant (in the case
    of Virginia this year you want to place emphasis on the regular 
    season).  There were only 48 spots available in 1983 whether or not 
    NC State won or not, so their victory sent someone home, and that kind 
    of thing has happened many times in many conferences (it's UW-GB's 
    beef this year, for example).  How do you know if only regular-season 
    champs were allowed automatic bids that there wouldn't be a different 
    list of NCAA champs and we'd be congratulating the NCAA and the 
    conferences for setting up the system that way?
    
    I don't dispute the fact that in a system relying on end-of-season 
    tournaments that middling teams can put together a winning streak 
    and win it all.  My contention that is that, regardless, it's not 
    preferable.  Whether teams belong or not should be determined strictly 
    on how they perform over the entire season.  It's the American way, as
    implemented by MLB, for instance.
    
    glenn
      
15.981ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ BayouMainTue Mar 17 1992 14:0418
    re .974
    
    Hunt, you cain vituperate all you want against integrity in college
    regular seasons (hint: what you have now is a exhibition season)...
    
    ... but you agreed to run the p_name and this is the upteenth time
    I've seen "Go Lady 'Hoos !!!" instead a my payment.
    
    Now, granted, you are desperate for something to cling to since your
    vastly overrated football team crashed and burned in its meeting 
    with reality and your hoops squad was rightfully relegated to the 
    NIT, and you are now grasping for this weak straw called women's
    college basketball (YAWN) - do all a that that's fine it's all right
    everything's gonna be ok but...
    
    PAY THE DAMNED DEBT BUDDY.
    
    MrT
15.982ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ BayouMainTue Mar 17 1992 14:0816
    I don't buy this jive-bull about the Runnin' Rabble being "clearly
    the best team" last year.
    
    Duke had the better center (Laettner is "clearly" the best player
    this year and was nearly the best last year), the best point guard
    (true, theirs was a sudden business genius multimillionaire), and
    in Grant Hill had by far the best swing player.  Duke also was much
    better coached, with Tark suing his jizz-bag team into the tourney
    and then blowing it by taking a ultra-quick squad into a zone at
    the darndest times.
    
    Also, when discussing this team or Tark's career people inevitably
    and inexplicably forget the Runnin' Rabble's chump change conference
    and the oodles a cupcakes it serves up week in week out.
    
    MrT
15.983Cain't you read ???SCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Tue Mar 17 1992 14:3611
15.984ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainTue Mar 17 1992 15:307
    Otiose obfuscation at its most vile.  .978 was and is out a spec
    and you are, drip by drip, slowly welshing on me.  Don't MAKE ME
    flex my legal know-how in here.  Do you wanna go home to joe family
    some night at weepily confess that you've just been found criminally
    insane by a panel a joe peers?  Do you?
    
    F. Lee ShagNasty
15.985Stupid bet deserves stupid punishment.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Mar 17 1992 15:319
    > Can't you read?
    
    I can read fine, and note 15.979, entered today, clearly lacks the
    required title.
    
    In other words buddy, you're welshing on your bet.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.986Not as accurate as portrayed ...CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RTue Mar 17 1992 15:325
	Not sure how Cap got the "seedings" of teams prior to the early
	1980's, because the NCAA didn't seed teams until then.  And if
	the polls are the measure, then we should use them throughout;
	i.e., let's not count UMass as a #3 seed, but make them the #5 or
	#6 seed in the east.
15.987the model should be honed by this pointANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainTue Mar 17 1992 15:510
15.988You been outsmarted, smartySHALOT::MEDVIDDancing in the deepest oceansTue Mar 17 1992 15:530
15.989You is barkin up da wong tweeSHALOT::MEDVIDDancing in the deepest oceansTue Mar 17 1992 15:560
15.990A big factor nobody ever talks about ...EARRTH::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Tue Mar 17 1992 20:0011
    re .976
    
    Bob is right about NC State. And what's more, if it hadn't been (IMO)
    for the weenie 3 point shot that the ACC had that year on an
    experimental basis (about 17' 6" if memory serves me right), NC State
    would have never won the ACC Tourny. 
    
    That line was a travesty, but the Pack had guys who could drain it
    (Wittenberg, Lowe, Gannon, Myers), and it paid off in a few wins.
    
    In any other season, they would have been dogmeat ...
15.991RAVEN1::B_ADAMSI'm too tough to tame!Tue Mar 17 1992 20:547
15.992STRATA::CAPPELTue Mar 17 1992 22:4620
    Wrong Rich,

    My information is completely accurate.

    You don't think the NCAA committee seeded the teams prior to the
    tourney?  Do you think they would do it arbitrarily?  It wouldn't
    make much sense to schedule a game between the #1 and #2 ranked teams
    in the first round now would it?  Any tournament committee would want
    that matchup for the regional final.  

    Also why would certain teams receive first round byes in the 60's and 
    70's?  Were they just lucky or do you think they were #1 seeds?

    I think you need to put some research into this before declaring 
    someone's work inaccurate.

    Cap

    
    
15.993Your statements are accurate ... NOTCSCOA1::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 18 1992 13:2752
>    Wrong Rich,
>
>    My information is completely accurate.
>
>    You don't think the NCAA committee seeded the teams prior to the
>    tourney?  Do you think they would do it arbitrarily?  It wouldn't
>    make much sense to schedule a game between the #1 and #2 ranked teams
>    in the first round now would it?  Any tournament committee would want
>    that matchup for the regional final.  
>
>    Also why would certain teams receive first round byes in the 60's and 
>    70's?  Were they just lucky or do you think they were #1 seeds?
>
>    I think you need to put some research into this before declaring 
>    someone's work inaccurate.
>

     I'll provide the information tomorrow, since I don't have it here today,
     but your information is incorrect.  They didn't seed the teams prior to
     the tournament, and it often provided one first/second round game between
     the lesser lights, with another game between two tough teams.
    
     As far as first round byes, the ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big Eight, Missouri
     Valley, Pacific Eight, and West Coast Conference champions got automatic
     first round byes until the NCAA tournament expanded to 32 teams in 1975.
     They usually were the better teams among tournament winners, but often
     there was an independent team with a better record, and yet independent
     teams never got first round byes.  Marquette was one of the better known
     examples, even coming into the tournament with a 25-1 record one year,
     but Penn was ranked #2 in the country in 1971 as undefeated Ivy League
     champions and didn't get a first-round bye (it went to the ACC champ,
     as the East Regional had 7 teams and only one bye from the late 50's-1974).

     You are wrong, and I'll demonstrate it before the end of the week when
     I have the time to type some glaring examples in here.  Meanwhile, I
     assume you have your research right at hand, so I'll be expecting a
     rebuttal to the facts when I enter them.

     Do I think they seeded teams arbitrarily ?  No.  Let's take the Mideast
     Region for example.  Prior to 1975, the SEC, Big Ten, Ohio Valley, and
     Mid-American champions automatically went to the Mideast Region, along
     with 2 independents.  One year the bracket would look like:
	OVC Champ vs Independent / winner vs SEC Champ
	MAC Champ vs Independent / winner vs Big 10 Champ
     The next year the bracket would look like:
	OVC Champ vs Independent / winner vs Big 10 Champ
	MAC Champ vs Independent / winner vs SEC Champ
     Region independents generally came from the region (i.e., you wouldn't
        see an eastern independent like Duquesne, for example, playing outside
        the eastern region), and generally would be placed in a bracket where
        there earlier rounds weren't against the same teams the played the
        previous year.  The facts will bear my statements out.
15.994Seeding argument essentially irrelevant; look at the teams...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 18 1992 13:5213
    
    The AP rankings should be sufficient to handle this argument if a
    strict seeding procedure was not in place in the 1960s and 1970s.  Those 
    rankings are readily available (they're listed in The 1991 Info Please 
    Sports Almanac, which I don't own; and I'm sure many college hoops
    books, which Cap probably does).  I do have a list of the Final Four 
    contestants on hand, though, and from the looks of it I believe that 
    Cap's contention that the top-seeded teams (or let's say AP Top 10 if 
    there was no seeding) generally were the ones to fill out the Final Four 
    ranks...
    
    glenn
     
15.995More BK Theater ???SHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Wed Mar 18 1992 14:396
 What's this we hear about Bob, in a fit of rage over the Purdue loss,
 canceling the team's upcoming annual post-season awards banquet ???
 
 What happened ???  Domino's couldn't deliver that night ???
 
 Bob Hunt
15.996perfect NCAA == Indiana and NC losing in round 1ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Mar 18 1992 14:415
    I though BobK cancelled an appearance before some annual dinner if a
    club that has been having them for a long time.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.99761-75 info wrong, 75-91 still supports claimSTRATA::CAPPELWed Mar 18 1992 14:4648
     >As far as first round byes, the ACC, SEC, Big Ten, Big Eight, Missouri
     >Valley, Pacific Eight, and West Coast Conference champions got automatic
     >first round byes until the NCAA tournament expanded to 32 teams in 1975.

    That's right I have not disputed that, they garnered either a #1 or
    #2 seeds based on winning tougher conferences, thus received byes and 
    easier 2nd round games.  This is what this book stated and I had no reason 
    to dispute that.  You simply stated that someone's work was inaccurate 
    without providing any proof whatsoever, I'll be the first to admit 
    something is wrong if it is proven wrong.
    
    During the early 60's it was taken as fact that despite records,
    winners of these conferences were considered the stronger teams, thus
    they received the byes and easier roads to the final four.  There
    might have been an anomoly here or there, but this was true in the 
    majority of cases. 
    
    I did not know that they used a specific formula for the Mideast region
    and that it alternated as you stated, this fact was not brought up in
    the book I used.  This does not alter the fact that the Big10 and SEC
    received the top rankings in their region(as well as the ACC and other
    conferences you listed).  This is what this reference stated, so since
    it seems I was wrong in this interpretation than I must redo my
    premise.
    
    However, this does not change the premise of the best teams
    winning the tourney, which was my point.  For example, 11 of the 17 
    winners since 1975 were top seeds and it can easily be said that 
    Cincinatti was the top team in the their region in 62, UCLA was the best 
    in 64-65,67-73 and NC State was the best in 74, which means that 22
    of the 31 years the best team in their region won the tourney and in
    each one of those years as well as many others it can easily be said
    that the one of the top teams in the country(top 4) won the tourney,
    quite a difference from saying that the best team in the country rarely
    wins the tournament.  That statement is unfounded, don't you agree.
    
    I found this information in a book at the Library(College basketball 
    reference book) while taking a break during work I was doing for my
    Master's.  If you'd like I will provide you with the name and author
    of the book next time I am there so that you can see how easily it
    was to think that teams were seeded based on the statements in the 
    book.  For example, it talked of the top-ranked East Regional team
    facing the top-ranked West Regional team in the 69 final and it talked
    about Dayton advancing from a lower seeding to break into the final 4
    in 1967.
    
    Thanks for correcting the error.
15.998STRATA::CAPPELWed Mar 18 1992 14:5514
    That's correct Glenn, my entire premise is that the best teams do
    win the tourney instead of rarely winning the tourney(as was previously
    stated).  This author was apparently in error based on his statements
    (although they may have been personal observations), but he stated 
    that the winners of certain conferences received the top 1 or 2 seeds
    (dependent upon the region) based on there winning their
    conference(because their winning was considered a significant 
    accomplishment as it was felt that the competition in these conferences
    was greater than between the  independents or other conferences).
    
    I'd be willing to bet that the winners of the major conferences were
    also among the top ranked teams in the polls the majority of the time.
    
    Cap
15.999FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Mar 18 1992 14:5921
    The Greater Bloomington Kiwanis Club has been hosting the annual awards
    banquet for the IU hoop team since the forties.  BK decided to cancel
    it this year.  His rationale, according to what I read in the paper, is
    that the seniors on the IU team (which to him was the true purpose of
    the dinner, honoring them) were being adequately honored at the last
    home game of the season.  I don't know whether it had anything to do
    with their poor performance against Purdue or not.
    
    The problem comes in with the way the cancellation was supposedly done. 
    This banquet raises funds for worthy causes.  Knight cancelled the
    banquet through his secretary two days ago.  The Kiwanis Club had
    already spent the money on promotion, tickets and so forth and now
    needs to refund a whole lot of money.
    
    My opinion?  If he wants to cancel, then that's fine.  He should have
    done it either months ago, or had the banquet this year and cancelled
    future ones after it.  Don't pull the plug at the last minute.
    
    This is from not knowing more than what I read in the paper.
    
    John
15.1000ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainWed Mar 18 1992 15:0119
    re .995
    
    Witch, why don't you just get out a this note.  We pay our debts
    out MidAmerica way.  
    
    As for the good Bob, yes he cancelled the annual Kiwanis Club
    men's basketball awards banquet saying nobody on this team deserves
    an award - except maybe something like "Most Pathetic Jump Shooter"
    or "Worst Rebounder" or "Most Abject Inside Defender."
    
    Yes, Witch, Bob pays *his* debts (unlike you), but the thing is this
    year none are due.  He also might be trying to motivate a squad that
    many familiar with it figure to either lose to LSU or to Gougetown/
    FSU one game later.
    
    That's why missing out on the Big10 Title hurts so much, this is not
    a tournament year for the Hoosiers.
    
    MrT                                
15.1001SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Mar 18 1992 15:253
       SO T how do you justify him stiffing the charities at the las
    minute. Cain't do it eh? At least you could admit Bob is wrong here.
                                      Denny
15.1002STRATA::CAPPELWed Mar 18 1992 15:4315
    
    My feeling is that since Knight donates tens of thousands of dollars
    out of his pockets to worthy causes and contributes time and effort
    as well and that it is not known if IU or Knight will reimburse money to 
    the charities mentioned that perhaps judgement on Knight should be 
    withheld until the full story is known.
    
    If he pulled out of this event and it cost the charities money than
    he was wrong.
    
    Canceling an engagement at the last minute is not what I would consider
    a good act as I'm sure many people were inconvenienced.
    
    However I don't know the full story of what happened.
    
15.1003ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainWed Mar 18 1992 15:466
    What's this?
    
    The AP article was careful to mention that Bob will cover the Kiwanis
    Club's losses out a his own pocket.
    
    MrT
15.1004update !LUNER::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Wed Mar 18 1992 15:467
    This is The Doc here at Midnight Central .... we now switch you to spin
    control specialists Shaughnessy and Cappel, who will comment on the
    positive aspects of the cancellation, with an analysis on how this is
    but further proof of BobKnights 'greatness'.
    
    Switching over live to Bloomington, IN with special feeds to Hudson, MA
    and Minneapolis, MN ....
15.1005This ain't like himSHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Wed Mar 18 1992 15:487
 I don't know the full story either but if he canceled this annual gig in a
 quick fit of pique over their loss to Purdue, then this is either BK
 Theater Deluxe (meaning the event will go on as usual once BK simmers back
 down) or he's giving his detractors all the more reason to question his
 tactics.   Or both.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.1006I think it stinksCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsWed Mar 18 1992 15:5118
	As I understand it, Knight told the Kiwanis club that that he'd 
reimburse them for all of their expenses.  I don't know what exactly that's
supposed to cover.

	As an IU fan, I ***HATE*** this.  Whether or not cancelling the banquet
is somehow justifiable, and I doubt that it is, it's going to end up looking
like (another) overreaction on Knight's part, and an incredibly arrogant one
at that.  I don't know all of the facts either, but years ago when I got to
watch the awards banquest on TV, it seemed like an honor for the players that
both they and the attending/viewing audience really enjoyed.  I don't like
seeing that go away.

	Then, of course, this will become another item in the opposing coaches'
list of "Reasons you shouldn't go to Indiana".  Knight just keeps making
recruiting harder and harder on himself.

tom
15.1007FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Mar 18 1992 15:577
    The oversight was unintentional (since I generally like Knight) but I
    also did read that IU/Knight would make good on the expenses incurred
    thus far.
    
    I basically agree with .1006
    
    John
15.1008STRATA::CAPPELWed Mar 18 1992 15:5812
    >If he pulled out of this event and it cost the charities money than
    >he was wrong.
    
    >Canceling an engagement at the last minute is not what I would consider
    >a good act as I'm sure many people were inconvenienced.
    
    Geez Doc, this doesn't look like spin control to me.  I simply stated
    that pulling out of any event at the last moment was bad and that since
    the full story was unknown let's not condemn anyone.
    
    
    
15.1009Reimbursement not good enough...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 18 1992 16:0513
    
    Commitments were made to people who paid who live and breathe Indiana
    basketball and who were counting on seeing this thing.  Apparently it's
    a 41-year tradition that pre-dates Knight.  The reimbursement of the
    charities is wonderful but irrelevant to the issue of Knight's behavior
    and the people, his fans, that his behavior inconveniences and betrays.
    If MrT's explanation that Knight did this as a sort of punishment for
    an undeserving team truly is the only mitigating circumstance, it's
    inexcusable.  I'm sure he could find another way to punish his team
    without punishing Indiana basketball fans.
    
    glenn
    
15.1010What I wanna believeSHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Wed Mar 18 1992 16:095
 This *has* to be BK Theater ... played out for motivational purposes only. 
 To his credit, Knight treats the IU Faithful as well as any college coach
 has ever done.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.1011CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RWed Mar 18 1992 16:413
	BK may be reimbursing expenses to date to the Kiwanis,
	but they won't be able to raise any money from this, either,
	which seemed to be the point of the event in the past.
15.1012STRATA::CAPPELWed Mar 18 1992 16:4210
    I agree if done as a punishment to the players that in turn punishes
    the fans and inconveniences people who put effort into planning the
    event than this is wrong also.
    
    It certainly doesn't make you proud to be an IU fan.
    
    Cap
    
    P.S. I certainly would have been pissed off if I was attending this 
         event and it was canceled.
15.1013STRATA::CAPPELWed Mar 18 1992 16:5210
    To Knight's credit, he is probably one of the most active coaches
    in terms of charities in the country.  I would imagine that the 
    Kiwanis club will either get money from Knight or the team will
    have a function at a later date to raise money for charities.
    
    Again since I don't know the full story, can't comment on the charity
    aspect of it....Perhaps we will see something happen in the near 
    future.

    
15.1014Note .1004 (?) has no real serious value ...(but don't tell T)LUNER::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Wed Mar 18 1992 17:217
    re .1008
    
    Cap, I started writing my note *before* you posted yours. It was
    intended to be a joke about future notes from you but especially MrT
    defending Knight (which may very well be justified) ....
    
    I mean, why spoil a good needle with facts ? :-)
15.1015Go Blue Young Guns!!!CELTIK::R_QUINNWed Mar 18 1992 18:3921
    Enough of the that IU stuff.  The FAB 5 will be in town Friday an it
    looks like I'll be hustling a ticket or two for the weekend.  They have
    a nice layout in the Atlanta Journal/Constitution.  Some comparisons to
    the 1989 Title Team:
    
     *	The Wolverines were third in the Big Ten and played in the
    	Southeast Regional(Atlanta).
    
     *	The regional semifinals and final were in Lexington Ky.
    
     *	The Final Four was played in a dome.  Seattle Kingdome in '89;
    	the Minneapolis Metrodome this year.
    
     * 	Steve Fisher as coach only not newly hired.  One of three Big Ten
    	team coaches that have won an NCAA tourney.  In two trips to the 
    	tourney 1 winner 50% ratio.
    
    The odds are against the 'rines but I wouldn't count them out.  It
    could be a great match up with 'Zona file if seeds go as planned.
    
    Roy L.
15.1016ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainThu Mar 19 1992 12:598
    Bob and the AD had been talking to the Kiwanis for months about
    cancelling the thing, the thinking being that Seniors' Day at the
    last home game already fulfilled that mission.
    
    As for charity, only one coach I know of has taken nearly $100,000
    out of his own pocket to help one if players in dire straits.
    
    MrT 
15.1017Bob's mean, but his players apparently aren't.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Mar 19 1992 13:126
    Sports Cover Story in todays USA Today features, you guessed it, Bob. 
    To sum up the story, it appears the kinder & gentler BobKnight has
    taken a backseat in recent weeks ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1018DUGROS::ROSSParty on, MrTThu Mar 19 1992 13:3921
    MrT will get plenty of ammunition out of today's article in USA Today,
    though, Chris.
    
    1) The Indiana team is characterized as "loaded" with talent.  Except:
    
    	"It could use some bulk, yes.  Maybe a purer outside shooter or
         two."
    
    	Gee, other than lacking size and shooting talent, they're awesome!
    
    
    2) Despite Bob's rampage, all of the quotes from the IU players show
       that they know it's their fault for lacking mental toughness and
       no backlash at all at the coach.
    
    
    I think this Knight episode is going to start a nice run for the 
    Hoosiers.  I expect a Final Four appearance.  If they make it there,
    watch out.  
    
    Chris, could you live with 4 > 1????   
15.1019I'd much rather have 3 > 2!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Mar 19 1992 14:0610
    Objectively speaking Ross, I'll be absolutely flabergasted if IU were
    to even advance to the Final 4, let alone win a Title.  Nothing against
    Bob, but I've gotta concede that Indiana, like North Carolina, is a
    flawed operation.  In our case, we're incredibly slow afoot.  In IU's
    case, they're small but, even worse, live and die by the outside
    jumper.  Tough to win a Title that way, cause some days you just aren't
    gonna shoot it well ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1020ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainThu Mar 19 1992 14:1522
    That's right, the only way to cover the occassional bad shooting 
    skein (or, in IU's case, the occassional good shooting skeing) is
    to get easy inside shots through sheer power, and to compensate by
    getting more shots by way of rebounding, with the O-'bounds being
    especially delectable cuz they so often yield the easy tip-in or
    jam.  Also helpful is the ability to make up for poor shooting by
    blocking and/or changing the other team's shots.
    
    IU has some things going for it (great team speed, good shot selection,
    tough D on the ball and in the passing lanes, good ball handling) but
    however it's told is steal... a small, poor shooting team.
    
    Given their spotty performance against tip-top competition (except OSU,
    who also lacks size) the Hoosiers' #2 seed is quite generous.  
    
    But their bracket is anything but, looking at LSU and then either
    Gougetown or those nukewidebodystudlys from Tallahassee.
    
    They'll be damned lucky to make the Sweet16 this year.  Worse, there is
    no big main on their horizon in terms of incoming recruits.
    
    MrT
15.1021CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RThu Mar 19 1992 14:496
>    They'll be damned lucky to make the Sweet16 this year.  Worse, there is
>    no big main on their horizon in terms of incoming recruits.
    
     No, they will be favorites in both of their first two games.  It will
     be a choke if they lose to EIU or BYU, and an upset loss to LSU which
     would require Bob to be outcoached by Dale.
15.1022The computer says......DEMSUP::MACDONALDI love March Madness!!Thu Mar 19 1992 15:0418
RE:  .1020

>>>They'll be damned lucky to make the Sweet16 this year.  
    
>>> MrT

	That's not what Jeff Sagarin's "objective" computer says.
According to Tuesday's USA Today, he played  the tournament 640,000
times on the computer and the most frequent winner was INDIANA with
141,250 wins.   Kansas was 2nd and Duke 3rd.  
	Altho the article goes on to say Saragin's computer hasn't 
been right about the champ since '82,  how do you account for the
big difference between winning the computer tournament more than
any other team and you're claim quoted above?   Sure you're not
just setting everyone up for "one of the greatest coaching performances
of all time"  should IU make the Final Four [or better]???     :-)

MAC2
15.1023ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainThu Mar 19 1992 15:0817
    You cain say that so long as you accept that they're not overrated,
    which I don't.  They gave up big leads to several teams this year,
    and have a mediocre record against top level competition.  What kept
    them so highly ranked was preseason expectactions, Bob's reputation,
    and the pud first half of their conference schedule.
    
    I don't think Bob expects much out a this team, and I know I don't.
    They'll be pitting any of three forwards against Shack, or Alonzo,
    and this is a team poor shooting team that needs to either hit from
    the outside or drive the lane to win.  They've had trouble with every
    dominating big main they've seen this year, losing more often than
    not, and Shack and Alonzo are certainly dominating.
    
    Poor rebounding, especially on defense, and susceptibility to having
    a lot a shots either blocked or changed is the reason for this.
    
    MrT
15.1024And ya calls me a sandbagger!CTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSThu Mar 19 1992 15:3410
    T,
    You reminds me of the High School coach who shouts "No, No" as his
    backup guard takes a three-pointer, then yells "Great shot" as it
    swishes through the net.
    
    Even tho I recognize IU's shortfalls, I got 'em in the Final 4,
    which is whar they'll be.
    
    MikeL
    
15.1025Big Ten only hype if IU ends up #2CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RThu Mar 19 1992 16:4417
	I finally recognize that T is right.  IU is not a great team.
	They would struggle against LSU, a #7 seed (which is where LSU
	should be seeded).

	Some reasonable conclusions:
	IU, unable to be convincing against a #7 seed, should themselves
	be seeded in the #6-#8 range somewhere.  They probably wouldn't
	even get out of the first round then.  Seems like the NCAA really
	is doing Bob a favor.

	The Big Ten Conference, which had IU as one of its two best teams,
	clearly is overrated.  Ohio State, which lost twice to the lowly
	Hoosiers, probably should be a #2-#4 seed somewhere.  If we
	make IU a #6 seed, we would need to seed Michigan State around #8
	and Michigan around #10.  This overrated conference only deserves
	4 teams at most, so we should see Iowa kicked out, and perhaps
	deserving Virginia in the NCAA's instead.
15.1026ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainThu Mar 19 1992 17:2925
    I don't see how the Big10 could be overrated given that the league
    is rated somewhere in the 3rd-5th best category this eyar.
    
    But you overlook certain things:
    
    1) Bob knows the other teams/coaches cold, and has the time to
       prepare for them well ahaid a time.
    
    2) Indiana goes into the tourney on a downswoop; not so State,
       OSU, and Michigan.
    
    3) Michigan was chosen by Bill Walton to win it all; they've gotten
       more dangerous and better with each game.
    
    4) Ditto for OSU with Funderburke.
    
    5) In a tourney scenario Bob lacks the team/coach knowledge and
       prep time he has in Big10 play.
    
    6) Michigan State goes in recovered from injuries to key players
       (Stegenga).
    
    Other than these things, you're right!
    
    MrT
15.1027EARRTH::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Fri Mar 20 1992 13:351
    More T Obstu-fic-ca-shon ...
15.1028dis-tor-shonANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYDailyAffirmation w/ CajunMainFri Mar 20 1992 15:131
    re 1
15.1029Defense? We don't need no steenking defenseCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsSun Mar 22 1992 22:0037
	Nice win by the Hoosiers to make the Sweet Sixteen.  What had to happen
happened --- good outside shooting by Indiana, and not much from the outside
by LSU after that incredible shooting stretch in the first 6 or 7 minutes.
Nice that Eric Anderson's back from his long vacation on the offensive end.

	Observations:

	*  If the key to the game for LSU is changing defenses to keep IU's
offense off balance, why is it they don't change defenses till the end of the
game?

	*  Is LSU the only team in country to run a defense for an ENTIRE game
that seems to be designed solely to keep a player out of foul trouble?

	*  Shaq better stay in college another year.  He's a nice player 
offensively from inside 8 feet, but he's apparently got no game beyond that
at all.  He's without a clue defensively.  Matt Nover went for what must have
been a career high against him, and Cheaney made him look worse.  For a while
I thought they'd have to be scraping pigeon droppings off Shaq during the
timeouts.

	*  How can a college player be so winded he needs to come out after
EIGHT MINUTES?

	* Bill Walton has a severe case of mumble-mouth, but he makes better
observations than any other color person in the tournament.


	Interesting path for the Hoosiers to get to the Final Four.  First, 
the LSU matchup the committee (read: CBS) has been trying to set up for 5 
years.  Then, the Florida State team they ousted from the tournament last year.
(Can you spell R-E-V-E-N-G-E?  I knew that you could).  If they get past them, 
they probably go up against a team that already beat them this year by 18 on 
a neutral court.  But if they play like they did lasted night...

tom
15.1030DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Sun Mar 22 1992 23:1714
    Tom, nice win by IU.  I believe however, that it wasn't so much what
    Indiana did as it was what LSU didn't do.  That had to be one of Mr.
    Brown's poorer coaching jobs.  I said earlier this season that he
    hadn't been coaching well since 1987.  Last night just proved my point. 
    Horrendous is the only way to describe it.  It should've been obvious
    to anyone that Anderson and Henderson were hot and would continue to
    drain the baseline jumper.  Therefore, you'd better come out of the
    zone, right Dale?  Wrong, you stay in it and let them have their way
    with you!
    
    Again, nice win by IU but I'd rather have seen Rupp coach LSU last
    night, and he's been dead 16 years!
    
    WILDCAT
15.1031NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 23 1992 12:3716
    
    > Shaq better stay in college another year.  He's a nice player 
> offensively from inside 8 feet, but he's apparently got no game beyond that
> at all.  He's without a clue defensively.  Matt Nover went for what must have
> been a career high against him, and Cheaney made him look worse.  For a while
> I thought they'd have to be scraping pigeon droppings off Shaq during the
> timeouts.

    If Shaq goes in for this "college is to enjoy" bull from Dale Brown
    he's making a big mistake, in my opinion.  I don't think he's learned a
    damn thing about hoops at LSU over the last couple years.  Better to
    come out, take the #1 money, and learn on the job, for real...
    
    glenn
    
    
15.1032CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Mar 23 1992 13:0418
    Nice little sidelight during the IU-LSU game was the occasional
    reminder of the '87 IU-LSU matchup and BobKnight's comments regarding
    Dale Brown's coaching ability. 
    I was amused at Knight's comments and I paraphrase "I was not confident
    about coming back from the deficit ( 13? point at halftime) and then
    I remembered who was coaching down the hallway. Then I knew we had a
    chance." Pretty damning and accurate, Bob . And right, we're supposed
    to believe that Knight has changed his mind about Brown's coaching
    ability. Based on what??  Haw Haw.
    
    Geez, with Bob putting on a leetle weight, adding more gray and always
    wearing that red/scarlet sweater, he's getting more and more to look
    like the OSU alum that he is!
    
    Could Columbus eventually be Bob's " coaching finale" down the road??
    
    MikeL
    
15.1033Will Shaq be back?CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsMon Mar 23 1992 13:3111
	Good point, Glenn.  I was thinking Shaq needed to work on other 
aspects of his game, but maybe staying at LSU will just make that worse
instead of better.  He certainly didn't get a chance to show anything on
Saturday.  The bad thing is that you know it doesn't have to be that way.
He's quick enough to play legitimate defense, and I don't think it would take
long to turn him into a reasonable shooter from about 10 feet.  He already
seems to have solved his free-throw shooting problem (13-13 against IU, I
believe).

tom
15.1034ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Mar 23 1992 16:4429
    Dale Brown dominated the game.
    
    Great job by this vaunted genius a a coach, staying in the zone
    like he did.  He robbed the Hoosiers a the chance to drive down
    the lane all day long and get their haids and shoulders deep
    bruised with rejected balls.
    
    As Alan Henderson said, "I didn't understand what was going on with
    that, but I sure enjoyed getting those (open) shots."
    
    But I credit Brown for the classy maudlin touch he laid on those
    cliched-catharsis grubbers called sports "journalists."  He tells
    a story about how some kids toss a concrete block through a windshield
    and kill a family and how the husband grieving his daid family held
    no grudge, and, sensing the parallel between that mass murder and
    Bob slamming a telephone in '87 decides that he will set aside his
    anger toward Bob and give him a call and inform him that he is
    forgiven.
    
    Haa !!
    
    Btw, MikeL, it was was 20 seconds or so left and IU down by a few and
    Bob calls a TO and, "I was afraid we were gonna lose, but then I looked
    down the sideline and saw Dale Brown talking to his players and knew
    right then we could pull it out."
    
    Haa hee !!
    
    MrT
15.1035CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Mar 23 1992 16:5611
    Thanks for the correction T.  Still makes me laugh!
    
    Haw
    MikeL
    
    As Hoosiers und Knight react with glee with the continued zone,I am
    reminded of the UNC-Marquette game whence McGuire and squad
    stupefyingly watch Deano's denizens go into the fo'corners and destroy
    mo'.  
    
    
15.1036RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 23 1992 17:038
    Mike L -
    
    When I watched the replay of Marquette-UNC a few weeks ago at lunch at
    a local 'restaurant', I was chuckling when UNC went to the 4 corners. 
    The Marquette players eyes got huge, Maguire started licking his chops,
    and the Heels went spinning down the tubes....genius move...
    
    JD
15.1037Not much fun to look forward to ...SHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Mon Mar 23 1992 17:155
 Michigan starts five freshmen and makes the Sweet Sixteen.
 
 Whimper.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.1038ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Mar 23 1992 18:087
    I had to luv it when the marble-moufed Bill Walton (the greatest
    college middlemain ever) said, "you have to give a lot a credit
    for this win to Bob Knight, he is able to get his player's to 
    believe in themselves and stick with their game plan even when
    14 points down and being completely dominated by Shaq."
    
    MrT
15.1039I thought you hated when they said that ???SHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Mon Mar 23 1992 18:123
 So, are they making a run or not, Mr Sand Bagger ExTraordinare ???
 
 Bob Hunt
15.1040ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Mar 23 1992 18:195
    Not talking to you buddy, Dr. Inga tells me that it cain turn
    into a self-abuse pattern to continue interacting with someone
    who has cheated you.
    
    MrT
15.1041SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Mar 23 1992 18:2120
    
    
    	After hearing Mr. T (ultimate Spin doctor) talk about how poorly 
    his IU team shoots, I expected them to build a new addition given the
    presence of shaq.  But nooo, they shot the ball pretty well and simply
    showed what a little outside shooting can do against a feeble zone.
    
    	T, you're still the greatest spin doctor around...you should really
    think about helping the Dem's out...they need some good folks who can
    tell a lie and make people believe it.
    
    	I though IU handled the situation very well and I was impressed
    with their poise after being down by 14.  They shot the ball real well
    which is contrary to what I've been hearing for 5 months..  
    
    	I guess seeing is really believing.
    
    
    							bill..g.
    
15.1042RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 23 1992 18:2511
    Bill -
    
    In fairness to MrT, I watched a few of Indiana's games down the stretch
    - and they were shooting horrbly.  Henderson was in a funk, as was
    Bailey, and Eric Anderson looked like he'd miss the ground if he
    dropped the ball out of his hands.
    
    The Purdue game was perfect example - IU come down, make a zillion
    passes - CLANG.   Repeat.  Clang.  Repeat.
    
    JD
15.1043ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Mar 23 1992 18:3116
    bill..g, say what joe want but the fack remains that against the 
    tough comp Indiana has shot poorly more often than not, and has
    been badly outperformed in terms a rebounds and blocked shots.
    
    They're a small team that MUST shoot well to win.  They shot 55%
    yesterday and won, but over the last several games (excerpting 
    the Ohio State game) had hovered around 35%.
    
    If joe are big you cain shoot badly and make up for it with the
    O-boards or blocks.  Not so IU.
    
    As I said, Dale Brown dominated this game.  They won't have that
    luxury against, in sequence, Pat Kennedy, Bob Harrick, and CoachK,
    who also have much more balanced teams than LSU.
    
    MrT
15.1044Montross would seem to have size on Funderburke ...RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportMon Mar 23 1992 18:5211
    I gotta fess up and state I've barely seen any Ohio State games this
    year.  (Seems Indiana's been absolutely *dominating* the tube from the
    Big10 conference ...)
    
    Anyway what cain Dean/UNC expect Thursday night?  Given that Carolina
    doesn't have a player in the same stratosphere as JJ
    height/position-wise, cain the Heels hope to exploit Montross & Co. in
    the interior?  What're the weaknesses of this Buckeyes 5?
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1045CAMONE::WAYDoin' the Vatican RagMon Mar 23 1992 18:539
MrT,

did you happen to catch the HOward STern show this weekend?

If you didn't, and you want a copy, send me a tape...  I'm telling you,
this show was WORTH saving for posterity....


'Saw
15.1046ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Mar 23 1992 19:006
    I'd luv to obtain the tape.  I was a avid listener of Howard and
    Robin in their early daze in New York and thought the show was
    entertainment at its best.  I've only seen his TV show twice, and
    I tell you MrT was NOT dissapointed!
    
    MrT
15.1047ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Mar 23 1992 19:0724
    The Buckeyes biggest weakness seems to be their lack of offensive
    concept, i.e., their propensity for chucking the pill to JJ and
    standing around admiring him like everybody else.
    
    OSU seems to be a slow-starting squad, and is not especially big
    up front.  ThunderBurp is a much quicker/higher jumper than Montross
    and has better timing and overall skeels.
    
    The Bucks are quick and will no doubt try to run n' gun if the stiff
    Montross should have any effect.  If that doesn't work they'll match
    Smif' stiff-for-stiff and send in 7-1 Bill Robinson.
    
    The worse news for the Star Hells could be ultra-quick Mark Baker,
    who likes to play the D and will be in Hubert's face.  Also quick is
    Chris Jent, who might match up against Lynch.
    
    The Star Hells could also have difficulty dealing with the Buckeyes'
    pressure D.
    
    MrT
    If Snuffer cain force the pace on OSU like he did this weekend on
    Bama he cain win the game.  If the Bucks are able to run it's the
    standard U.S. Government issue Sweet16 Excellent Loss and goodbye
    routine for the Hells.
15.1048CAMONE::WAYDoin' the Vatican RagMon Mar 23 1992 19:0817
Send me a tape:

	Either
		 Frank Way  BMF 1-1


	Or

		Frank Way
		85 North Street
		Hebron CT 06248


I'll make you a copy.  You'll LOVE it....


'Saw
15.1049ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Mar 23 1992 19:2610
    Hey 'saw I might send a tape as well. I remember having the combo of
    Imus in the morning and then Howard and Robin in the afternoon when
    both were on NBC in NY. Howard's dial a dates for Friday afternoons
    were something else. They ranged from getting a date with a virgin -
    self proclaimed don;t think he went as far as checking - to dates with
    call girls to dates with women into heavy metal. Real fun stuff, almost
    made Fridayt afternoon traffic at the bridge/tunnel bearable.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
15.1050CAMONE::WAYDoin' the Vatican RagMon Mar 23 1992 19:426
He is way far out now....  

I actually HURT on Sunday morning from laughing so hard....


'Saw
15.1051Everyone now, send a tape to the 'Sawmain!SASE::SZABOThe TicketmasterTue Mar 24 1992 11:521
    
15.1052Hawk, Hawk, Hawk....RUGBY1::wayWrap them knees, boy!Tue Mar 24 1992 12:1518
No....


Everybody send a tape to HAWK at

		John Szabo
		c/o The Black Hole For Tickets
		7 Yellow Brick Road
		Bradford Mass


I guarantee he will lose your tapes, and then I won't have to work at making
copies....


hth,
'Saw

15.1053CTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Mar 24 1992 13:2618
    Ah Howard.
    Wasn't he in DC in the early 80's?  I remember when the Air Florida
    jet crashed into the Potomac in early '81. Friend of mine who lived
    in DC told me the next day Howard was calling the airline requesting
    Air Florida to change its flight pattern so's their jets wouldn't fly
    over that particular bridge at rush hour. Cold man,cold. Don't remember
    if my friend told me Howard originated from DC or was in syndication
    from NY.
    
    You guys remember back a few years when 'BCN would run his radio shows
    on Sat. AM?  I recall one show when he was singin with the Fabulous
    Thunderbirds in a little re-hash of "Ain't that tough enough (?!)"
    called "Ain't no m#ff too tough." Classic.
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
15.1054RUGBY1::wayWrap them knees, boy!Tue Mar 24 1992 13:298
I think Howard was syndicated out of New Yawk....


He's irreverant, without a doubt.  His show is getting farther and farther
outta control every week.  He's pushing the envelope, and I love it...


'saw
15.1055Just a thought....AKOCOA::PETERSONTue Mar 24 1992 13:367
    
    ...Saw'
    
         Ya think Howard deserves his own note?
    
    Mel
    
15.1056More ...SHALOT::HUNTGo Lady 'Hoos !!!Tue Mar 24 1992 13:3816
15.1057RUGBY1::wayWrap them knees, boy!Tue Mar 24 1992 13:586
Should probably keep Howard either in the Junk Note, OR, because it
doesn't conflict with the LA Law and Northern Exposure noting in the
Southern Cal note, we could do it there....


'Saw
15.1058SASE::SZABOThe TicketmasterTue Mar 24 1992 14:0315
    re: the Air Florida disaster
    
    What a coincidence- last night I was having conversations with my bar
    customers about plane crashes as the Sony wide-screen was showing the
    latest, and one of my comments was that whenever I 1st hear of a crash,
    I get this sick feeling as I recall the Air Florida crash and the
    footage of the rescue scenes in the river.  I also did know someone who
    died in the AF crash- a salesman from a company I worked at before
    DEC...
    
    Also, one of my wildest fantasies is to be a survivor of a plane
    crash...
    
    Hawk
    
15.1059Wasn't feeling too confident on yesterday's flightSHALOT::MEDVIDDancing in the deepest oceansTue Mar 24 1992 15:019
    Jai's cousin with whom we stayed in Maimi a few weeks ago was an Air
    Florida sky-waitress (better known as flight attendants) and was
    scheduled for that flight out of National.  She was rescheduled to
    another flight the day before the crash.
    
    Funny Jai was just telling me this the other night after the USAir
    crash and now we're talking about it in here.
    
    	--dan'l
15.1060on airplane crashesANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Mar 24 1992 15:2727
    I'm not sure I like all this talk about crashing and burning in 
    the Big10 note during the middle a the NCAA tourney.
    
    Take it to the Big8 or Big Least note please.
    
    Howard & Robin started off in DC and were run out a town on a rail
    after his little Air Florida imbroglio.  Also, he started his storied
    radio career on the BU college station.
    
    A close friend a mine in Denver's wife was the haid stew on the 
    United flight that went down in Portland several years ago, a
    especially harrowing experience seeing that they circled for hours.
    She said the when they ran out a fuel the engines made a wierd noise
    and the plane jolted and then the lights went out.
    
    Then the plane made the too fast descent down towards the river.
    She said it was funny how there was no wailing or hysteria, just
    quiet whimpering.  Then the crash, she comes to, her chair is 10 ft.
    above the floor at the front edge of the back half, looking down at
    a pile of mangled bodies.  She was unhurt.
    
    Perhaps the most amazing uninvestigated fack EVER by our allegedly
    liberal-adversarial media is the undisputed FACK that the flight
    blown up by explosives during takeoff from O'Hare during the heat
    of Watergate contained Howard Hunt's wife... carrying $25,000.
    
    MrT
15.1061I should've known better than to askFRETZ::HEISERmaranathaTue Mar 24 1992 18:206
>    Perhaps the most amazing uninvestigated fack EVER by our allegedly
>    liberal-adversarial media is the undisputed FACK that the flight
>    blown up by explosives during takeoff from O'Hare during the heat
>    of Watergate contained Howard Hunt's wife... carrying $25,000.
    
    MrT, are these "facks" from some sourc... oh never mind!
15.1062ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Mar 24 1992 18:4017
    That Mrs. Howard Hunt perished on a flight that crashed on take
    off from O'Hare because a bomb exploded somewhere in the cabin, 
    and that she was carrying $25,000 is not open to dispute.  It was
    reported by AP, UPI, Reuters, everybody.  But they mentioned it
    in a small article, once, and never sought out the answers to the
    obvious questions stemming form this.  Also, the electronic media
    shrugged it off, and the so-called investigative committee somehow
    decided that it was all just a big coincidence and that we shouldn't
    get hung up on CIA conspiracy theories.
    
    As they say, you cain look it up!  Try some microfiched newspapers
    in joe public liberry.  Or any good Politcal Science desk liberrian
    there will know of this by heart and cain tale joe the date and 
    add'l references.
    
    HTH,
    MrT
15.1063NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 24 1992 18:467
                        
    So what's the critical missing piece of information, then, MrT?  I'm 
    sure that, as usual, there's more to this story than you're being up 
    front about, you conspiracy buff you...
    
    glenn
    
15.1064LAGUNA::MAY_BRIt ain't the thing, it's the flingTue Mar 24 1992 20:474
    
    Mrs. Hunt shot JFK!  Don't tell the micro-Hunts, though.
    
    Brews
15.1065ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Mar 24 1992 22:2326
    Nyah, say what you will, but it is acknowledged and established
    fact that Mrs. Howard Hunt died in Chicago when the thing was
    starting to unravel in a plane that the FAA concluded was blown 
    up and had in her possession at least $25,000.
    
    If that sounds normal to you, ok by me.
    
    As with JFK, MLK, RFK, and Iran Contra, the powers-that-be ran 
    a show investigation careful to avoid all the critical issues
    and evade the hardest questions and noisily swept the thing under
    the rug.
    
    Nixon didn't resign for threat of impeachment based on what was 
    known, they threatened him into leaving with revealing the really
    big stuff.  He agreed, and part of the packaged included a pardon
    from Ford and a show investigation.
    
    Dunno what it was, but there was something as the non-investigation
    of Mrs. Hunt's wierd demise proves, and Nixon wasn't afraid of
    embarrassement so much as being impeached for Treason, which carries
    a strict death penalty at its most egregious.
    
    We'll never know, just like we'll never know what was in the 600 
    pounds of documents Ollie and that buck-toothed sec'y of his shredded.
    
    MrT
15.1066CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSWed Mar 25 1992 13:146
    Awright T!
    Been researching and reading the same stuff ah has. Keep it up
    ma main.
    
    MikeL
    
15.1067ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Mar 26 1992 12:1034
    Bob's on a classic roll this tourney.  (No, I'm not talking
    about Bob "Witch" Hunt's badl-faced face-saving exercise, I'm
    talking that Pantehon-dweller.)
    
    At various news conferences:
    
    - He's said he' gonna talk fiction cuz that's all sportwriters
      write anyway.
    
    - He said that after the Purdue loss he made his team sleep 
      outside.
    
    - He appeared yesterday before the press brandishing a bullwhip,
      explaining that dipping the sink in water enhanced its effectiveness
      saying, "there is no finer device you could have" than the 10 foot
      bullwhip he was snapping, or tryhing to snap.
    
    - Hee looks down at WAC SID Jeff Hurd, who introduced him, asking
      "can I have some water?"  (Hurd served him immediately.) 
    
    - When asked if he thought games started too late, he answered that
      they should start at seven in the morning to get the housewives off
      of the Nordic Traks and TV weight programs and cuz coaches would have
      time to golf and fish to unwind after the game.
    
    - Later he reminded the press that when his team was in the parking
      lot trying to fall asleep, shivering, he occassionally took a fire
      hose and watered them down.
    
    Haa.  They write lies about him anyway, so it was classic to start a
    conference by pulling out a 10 ft bullwhip, glowering at the press,
    and axeing, "anybody got a question?"
    
    MrT
15.1068Classic KnightSCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Thu Mar 26 1992 12:513
So, are the Hoosiers making a run or not ???

Bob Hunt
15.1069sated satyrANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Mar 26 1992 14:594
    Hoosiers have MADE their run.  Sweet16 excellent loss so sweet 
    cain't wait bring on the FSU nukewidebodies !!
    
    MrT
15.1070It's there!RAVEN1::B_ADAMSI'm too tough to tame!Thu Mar 26 1992 17:486
    	In the dictionary, under Bob Knight, it says...See Jerk!

    What a wimp...

    B.A.
15.1071.1069,UGH!CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSThu Mar 26 1992 18:061
    
15.1072ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Mar 26 1992 18:204
    Yeah, B.A., when he gave out $75,000 a his own pocket to Landon 
    Turner when he went down paralyzed... he was being a real jerk.
    
    MrT 
15.1073look what I foundSYOMV::SPRAGUEThu Mar 26 1992 19:4214
15.1074WELCOME!!!!!7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Thu Mar 26 1992 20:0511
    Hello Stan and welcome to the world of freekin sports lunatics!!!!
    
    Hope ya have fun here and stick around for a long time!
    
    Please put an intro someplace in the beginning of the file, maybe note
    2?
    
    I remain,
    today's official greeter!
    Kev
    
15.1075RAVEN1::B_ADAMSI'm too tough to tame!Thu Mar 26 1992 20:1710
15.1076ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Mar 26 1992 22:2117
    This new guy Stan knows his hoops.  Vegas has the Hoosiers by 
    9 1/2.  Way I figure it there's a predictive paradox: IU should
    win by 12 IF they shoot well, but if FSU's streeballers get on
    a roll and go unconscious they could win by 35.
    
    A game a asymmetrical margins is what it is.
    
    You are so RIGHT, sir!  Alan is the key.  Damon too.  If he drops
    4 or 5 treys then the inevitable eye-popping 2-3 minute surges by
    the 'Noles will be negated, and Indiana weal win cuz a shot selection
    and passing lane filling D.
    
    Cassell is one skeery widebody though.
    
    Bring on the 'Noles!!
    
    MrT
15.1077Bring on the BruinsCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Mar 27 1992 01:4326
	Eric Anderson's the key for the second game in a row, scoring a
season-high 24 as the Hoosiers win by 1 more than the line, and 1 less
than Stan (EXCELLENT prognostication).  Calbert Cheaney scores only 2 the
first half (not his fault, according to the coaches) but comes back with
15 in the second half, and also grabs 11 boards as IU outrebounds FSU by
3 or 4.  Damon Bailey played most of the game, I assume because he wasn't
doing anything dramatically wrong.  He sure as heck wasn't doing anything
dramatically right.

	On the post-game show, Norm Ellenberger felt like they played
tentatively the whole game.  The hope is that, now that they've gone farther
than last year (one of the pre-season goals), they'll relax for Saturday's
game.  He said it's nice to walk away from a big win like this and know you
can play better.

	The Noles were truly undisciplined offensively, which was expected,
but I was surprised at the lack of defensive discipline.  Serious foul
trouble the whole game, and it was all because reaching is a way of life
for that team.

	UCLA (I assume) on Saturday.  They had them in November and let them
get away, which has been a common trait for this time.  Maybe they can get a 
little revenge this time around.

tom
15.1078What goes around comes around ....ELMAGO::BENBACAStardust, Thats what you are!Fri Mar 27 1992 03:266
    Norm Ellenberger. Boy is that name a blast from the past. Used to be
    head coach here at the PIT. Got in trouble with the NCAA, was out of
    coaching for a while. Coached a team in the now defunct women's pro
    league. Went to UTEP for a while with the Don Haskins and now surfaces
    with Bobby Knight, who almost ended up here in the PIT as head coach
    UNM a couple or three years back. 
15.1079Drown a few worms, down a few beers..CUBIC7::DIGGINSIn search of the lost chord.Fri Mar 27 1992 11:297
Any man who loves fishing as much as Bob Knight can't be all
that bad.



Steve
15.1080ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Mar 27 1992 11:5518
    The Hoosiers shot well (27-52) and won by 11.  It's telling
    that this is with Eric having his game a the season to reach
    49% from the field, but on the other hand they missed five
    layups and Damon (who has no rotation on his shot) continued his
    inconsistency.  
    
    It looked bad when Alan picked up his 3rd foul in the first half
    banging with FSU's widebodies, but besides the foul trouble he was
    holding his own.
    
    The Hoosiers CAIN'T spot UCLA a big early lead,  which has indeed
    been their habit against nearly all tough opponents since they did
    it starting the season against the Bruins.
    
    A good start, good shooting, smart defense, and no fould trouble and
    they cain write their ticket to the Final4.
    
    MrT
15.1081Indiana deserves better than ye of so little faithNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Mar 27 1992 12:038
    
    > A good start, good shooting, smart defense, and no fould trouble and
    > they cain write their ticket to the Final4.
    
    Wow, your confidence is really picking up steam now, huh, MrT?
    
    glenn
    
15.1082Hoosiers did what they had to do. FSU didn't.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Mar 27 1992 12:2518
    Nice effort by the Hucksters last night to control FSU.  I thought the
    Noles really played into their hands by playing their trapping defense
    so much.  When they've been most effective with it is when they use it
    sparringly, springing it only occasionally much to the surprise of the
    opponent.  Last night, against a team everyone agrees is loaded with
    ballhandlers, they tried it early and often, with the result usually
    being an easy shot for the Hoosiers.  (They missed alot of lay-ups,
    BTW.)
    
    Also Sam Cassell's shot selection left *much* to be desired.  The shots
    he was taking were shots they could've gotten any time, yet he felt the
    urge after about 1 pass thru the offense.
    
    All in all, a nice 'W' for IU, but certainly not one_a Pat Kennedy's
    better game plans ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1083Good strong win. Cheaney's possessedCTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSFri Mar 27 1992 12:369
    Stop Holtzin' it T!
    Be proud a ya alma mater.  Heh, Heh. Things are looking good fer
    me pool. Gots Duke over UK and IU to revenge itself on the UCLAns
    
    Dukies and Hoosiers in Final 4. Bob gits back to the Promised Land
    agin his pupil.
    
    MikeL
    
15.1084ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Mar 27 1992 13:0934
    Waugamain, nothing's changed in my Hoosier analysis.  I've said
    all along that this is IU's most talented team in years, probably
    their quickest team ever, but that they're unbalanced in the type
    a talent they have, i.e., they're small and have no depth up front,
    and that they're a so sporadic with their shooting that they're 
    the kind a team that cain beat most anybody or get mainhandled by
    most anybody.
    
    It's like that when you cain't compensate for poor jump shooting with
    offensive rebounds and blocked/changed shots and such.
    
    All this holds true for the UCLA game, only more so.  You saw the 
    lack a front-line depth against FSU when Alan got the early three
    and went to the bench... never to return.  But FSU is also a 3-guard
    team, so Bob went to that, leaving both a his ostensible centers (Alan
    and Nover) on the bench for the 2nd stanza as GGraham and Damon, 6-4
    and 6-2 respectively, went up front.
    
    They won't have that luxury against UCLA, who is much bigger, better
    shooting, and deeper.  But they cain win if the resuscitated Eric keeps
    it up, and nobody gets into early stupid foul trouble.
    
    Notice that Bob is hedging against foul trouble by starting the awful
    (but much improved) Matt Nover in the post to pick up the early fouls
    against the other squad's true center(s).
    
    McLean Sylvester and, who, Murray?  Whoa.  They'll need to be at their
    best here.  In a way they match up against Duke better.
    
    Bob has acquitted himself now.  He's got them to the Final8 and is now
    going up against a higher seed, a team who blew them away on a neutral
    floor this season, a much deeper and more balanced team.
    
    MrT
15.1085NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Mar 27 1992 13:209
    
    I know your analysis hasn't changed, MrT, and I commend you for that,
    but you're actually giving Indiana a chance now if they play well as
    opposed to your earlier "imminent middle round elimination at the
    hands of the nukewidebody studs".  Glad to see that you can still be a
    fan, too...
    
    glenn
    
15.1086Will you admit it if they snip the nets in Minny ???SCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Fri Mar 27 1992 13:273
So, Po', are they making a run now or what ???

Bob Hunt
15.1087ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Mar 27 1992 13:3942
    Waugamain my prediction thus far is only one game off (and I hope it
    ends up 3 games off) but the analysis holds in that somehow Bob has
    gotten this team righted just as it entered the tourney, and it's now
    shooting very well - something that with this team could change in a
    second to a abrupt end.
    
    Setting the shooting aside, what has happened thru the Big10 season
    (we have a real conference season in the Big10, not a 5 day season like
    the Big8 or Almost Close for example) has been encouraging, things 
    that have built up over the last two months:
    
    - After early awful floor game play (and a psycho insanity abusive
      benching by Bob) Calbert has gone on a mission rebounding and
      defending - his best performance EVER was the D he put on JJ during
      the Blmgtn. game.
    
    - Alan Henderson may be 30 lbs underweight, but he's wiry strong and
      tough minded and has emerged as a force.  We knew he could shoot, 
      but he has dispelled any lingering doubts whether somebody that thin
      could bang inside.  He's got talent in his great timing, especially
      jumping, and great hands.  Alex English was skinny too.
    
      Henderson's emergence has given them a true front-line, if lacking
      a creditable substitute up front.  Quinn Buckner was probably right
      last night when he traced Eric's terrible shooting woes to, after
      3 years, finally moving to his true position and playing facing the
      basket.
    
    - The team has settled into its roles.  Especially among the guards,
      where they have only one complete player in GGraham, but also
      including Nover and Damon playing up front.  Matt Nover has little
      or no talent, but about mid-way through this season he suddenly 
      became an effective role player, no longer making the stupid passes
      failed pass catches stupid fouls freak out turnovers dribbles of the
      foot desperation shots in non-desperation situations.  He's now
      playing a clean game, within his limits.
    
    - The emergence of fairly decent rebounding.  Eric is boarding better
      than ever, ditto Calbert, and they have a true windex main in Alan.
      Damon and GGraham are as always crashing the boards.
    
    MrT
15.1088SYOMV::SPRAGUEFri Mar 27 1992 13:5622
 Like I said, Cassall and Edwards never saw a shot they didn't like (or take)
 and the incredible lack of discipline and inovation on offence would be the
 downfall of FSU. Kind of reminded me of Dale Brown's intricate offence last 
 week. But I was a litte off IU only won by 11.

 Lets here it for Eric Anderson. After single handedly losing the Michgan 
 game, then teaming with Baily to loose the Purdue game, loosing his starting
 job, and looking like he was afraid to take a free throw 1 week ago, he comes 
 out shootin the rock, and leading IU to victory. 

 I'm encouraged, last night, Hendersone stunk, Baily stunk, Renolds stunk, 
 Graham was ok, Cheney was average, Nover may not have suited up, Meeks played 
 well, and Anderson was great --  and the still won by 11.

 UCLA will be tough. Baily and Graham are going to have to contribute. 
 Hendersone may again be the key. Cheney and Anderson should almost offset
 the M+M boys, so the role players will decide the outcome.

 I don't know why, but I have a hunch the winner of this game could very well
 be our national champ ?

 Stan.
15.1089Seen too many open 3's this year ... :^(RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Mar 27 1992 14:086
    The one aspect of Indiana's game that I really like is there great
    perimeter defense, which *really* comes in handy with the 3-point shot
    innovation.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1090RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Fri Mar 27 1992 14:3512
    Be atough game for IU vs. UCLA.  But next to Howard Miner and USC, Don
    American Pie, Tracey Murray,and the rest of the Bruins are even easier
    to dislike.  The key to UCLA is Murray - and not McLean.  The team
    feeds off of Murray.  Get him into early foul trouble - if I was Bobby
    K. - I'd try to get Calbert isolated on Murray.  Murray is simply a
    horrible defender, and will hack away in his attempt to stop the
    offense.    But he cain killya with those threes...
    
    BTW, Bobby's press conference was another classic.  ANother big
    difference between Knight and Snuffy Smif.  Bobby has a personality.
    
    JD
15.1091CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Mar 27 1992 18:1815
	Expect the Hoosiers to pack it in early against the Bruins and make
them show they can hit the outside shot in a big game.  Unless Murray and
Maclean really light it up, keeping them outside also keeps them off the
offensive boards.

	The transition game was what beat IU in the November matchup.  If
they do the offensive things they need to do to slow UCLA down --- protect
the ball, shoot a reasonable percentage on shots they get by running the
offense, and hit the offensive boards a little bit --- it should be a good
game.  If UCLA's transition game gets going, though, it could be lights out.
The Hoosiers transition defense has been shaky all year, and UCLA's run the
break well when I've watched them.

tom
15.1092RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Fri Mar 27 1992 19:348
    Tom -
    
    Murray was the PAC10's highest percentage 3-point field goal shooter. 
    Letting him bomb from outside might be suicide.  If Murray gets going,
    the Bruins are hard to stop.  However, Murray seems to get frustrated
    easy.
    
    JD
15.1093Coulda fooled meSHALOT::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now!!!Sat Mar 28 1992 22:1113
 Indiana 106, UCLA 79
 
 Looks like a title run, smells like a title run, cracks a bullwhip like a
 title run ... Geez, it's too bad the Hoosiers suck so badly otherwise I'd
 say they're making a title run ... which a certain yours truly noter has
 been calmly insisting would happen all along.
 
 But, alas, it's not ... 'cause of course they're .. what is it ??? ... Oh,
 yeah, they're slow on the wings, weak inside and cain't shoot for sheet.
 
 C'mon, Po', are they making a run or not ???
 
 Bob Hunt
15.1094RAVEN1::B_ADAMSI'm too tough to tame!Sat Mar 28 1992 22:325
    
    	B.Knight is still a jerk!
    
    B.A.
    
15.1095ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightSun Mar 29 1992 16:3325
    Witch, I have never said that Indiana is slow on the wings.  This
    is the quickest Hoosier team ever.
    
    UCLA played a dirty gutless game yesterday.  The refs let them get
    away with several outrageous cheap shots early in the game (MacDirty
    flings an elbow at Eric's haid, Madkins goes through a pick throwing
    his hands up in Damon's face, Murray swings and elbow at Alan's haid,
    MacDirty flings Alan to the floor, MacDirty elbows Alan and then talks
    trash to him going up the floor, with senior Jamaal stepping in only
    to pick up a T, then, with a foul finally being called, MacDirty throws
    yet another elbow, this time connecting, and gets only a intentional
    foul instead a thrown out a the game).
    
    And when it was over they're blaming it on the elevation as if the 
    Hoosiers were playing at sea level.
    
    Career games for Nover, Henderson, and Anderson.  Best game the squad's
    played all year, best defense they've played in a long long time.  I 
    think UCLA dirty cheaty approach to the game really backfired on them.
    
    Quinn Buckner said it best when MacDirty got the intentional call,
    "when things aren't going your way, you should just take it like a main
    a accept it instead of pulling stunts like that."
    
    MrT
15.1096SYOMV::SPRAGUESun Mar 29 1992 20:5630
"Ditto" to eveything MrT said. Macdirty never got it going,
got frustrated and started jawin' and throwin' elbows. Murry 
to his credit stuck with it and toughed it out for a few points.
How bout that hoosier perimiter D. No easy shots for the M&M 
boyz. MrT noted Nover, Henderson and Andersons efforts, 
I'd like to mention Damon played real well. Lets here it
for Digger who on the pregame show who said something like "IU
will win easy, and Baily will have a huge game".  After watching
ten years or so of ND Basketball I was ready to conclude
Digger knew nothin bout hoops. 

As long as we're on the pregame show, nice to see Dale Brown
put marble mouth Walton in his place. Everyone takes shots
at Dale, and he certainly isn't the greatest x&o's coach,
but he is, the most positive, upbeat, likable guy around, 
and didn't deserve Walton blasting him for an entire week.

Back to the game... watching Henderson Dominate the paint w/ 
rebounds and block shots brings back memories of DC (thats Derick 
Coleman for you non upstate new yorker's) grabin' 19 boards against 
IU in '87.  Nover looked like a player, and Calbert was his steady
self. You heard it here first, IU beats Duke by a tre. UK proved 
Duke's beatable and exposed some weakneses. (Like for instance, a 
ultra quick point guard can beat Hurley like a rented mule.) Also
The monster mash out quicked Laetner to many rebounds - Alan will
have to do the same.  Man for man Duke is probably a better club,
but the best club rarely wins this tourney. Give BK a week, and he
could beat the Bulls.(alright, maybe the Knicks).

Stan.
15.1097That was a clinic ... and it was *no* accident.SHALOT::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now!!!Mon Mar 30 1992 05:5012
15.1098So much for the Big Ten champsSHALOT::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now!!!Mon Mar 30 1992 06:1220
 Congratulations to the Big Ten for placing 2 teams in the Final Four. 
 Very impressive run by the conference this year.   Michigan is downright
 scary and ought to be able to dispatch of the Bearcats while the Duke-IU
 matchup ought to be one of the best of all time.
 
 I don't suppose it will solve the endless urination contest over the ACC
 Tournament vs the Big Ten round-robin but it should be noted that at least
 the ACC placed its champion in Minnesota.   The Big Ten's champ is on a
 bus ride home.
 
 Indiana's loss to Purdue was the best thing that could have happened to
 them.  They might not have survived the Southeast Region had they won the
 Big Ten.   Going out west meant fewer distractions and perhaps slightly
 less pressure as the No 2 seed.   And then Knight was brilliant, of
 course, in focusing the media circus on him instead of on the players ...
 The bullwhip and the hilarious "game" faces were priceless.
 
 Wonder if Cheaney will be running laps in practice Monday ???
 
 Bob Hunt
15.1099hailDTIF::MCEVOYMon Mar 30 1992 12:5216
    hard to believe that a team that lost by 20 to Wisconsin late in the
    season is now in the final four!
    
    Hats off to Steve Fisher, the team continues to play focused and in
    control for all 40 minutes. I have a lot more respect for him now,
    I don't think Bill Frieder would have been capable of bringing this
    team this far.
    
    This team is so much fun to watch, I hope they all stick around for
    a few years.
    
    I would love to see an all big ten final. While Laettner certainly
    deserves to be suspended, I hope he doesn't so Duke doesn't have any
    excuses. 
    
    -dennis
15.1100SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Mar 30 1992 13:423
       Just remember 1 thing about this Michigan team. If they all don't
    turn pro early, we might be in for a long run a titles here.
                                         Denny
15.1101ROYALT::ASHEWho can turn the world on w/ her smile?Mon Mar 30 1992 13:481
    Let's go Blue!!!
15.1102I'll be rooting for Indiana, but still...SHALOT::MEDVIDDancing in the deepest oceansMon Mar 30 1992 14:2410
    Why does Laettner deserve to be suspended?  What he did was
    unsportsmanlike for sure and I have formed a new opinion of the jerk,
    but the proper punishment was handed out as would be handed out to any
    other player...a technical foul, two shots and the ball.

    If the Kentucky player had gotten up and started swinging and Laettner
    swung back, then, as the NCAA rules state, both would be suspended.  As
    for this incident, it was handled very appropriately (i.e. by the book).

    	--dan'l
15.1103Expect Laettner to play, but it looks bad...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 30 1992 14:3320
    
    > Why does Laettner deserve to be suspended?  What he did was
    > unsportsmanlike for sure and I have formed a new opinion of the jerk,
    > but the proper punishment was handed out as would be handed out to any
    > other player...a technical foul, two shots and the ball.
    
    The main reason being given is that UConn's Rod Sellers was suspended 
    last year for a very similar incident after a review of the tapes of 
    their game with Duke.  I heard Billy Packer and company saying yesterday 
    that this was somehow different because it was handled on the court by 
    the officials.  That's a very weak rationale.  Since when does a 
    technical foul equal a game suspension for the same offense?  The NCAA
    is caught in a serious bind whichever way they go on this one.
    
    Just curious about the feelings in here, since the Sellers incident was 
    discussed in detail last year...  Did you think the suspension was
    justified then?
    
    glenn
     
15.1104RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 14:369
    Dan'l-
    
    I think Laettner should be suspended because Sellers of UCONN was
    suspended for a_intentional foul in last year's tourney - he sat out
    UCONN's first game.  The message seems to be "Touch Chrissy, get
    suspended, but Chrissy cain do it and get away from it - and get
    praised by the announcers..."
    
    JD
15.1105RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 14:3819
    Before the tourney, I said that Eric Anderson had to start hitting for
    IU to have a chance.  He's been hitting.
    
    Knight's been great.  the game faces were fantastic.  The bull-whip
    thing is blown out of proportion, and the NCAAP once again does the
    knee-jerk without looking at the whole picture.  
    
    
    Denny -
    
    As I said earlier, IMO, Michigan better win it this year.  I predict
    nothing  from them in the future if they don't.   Rose and Webber are
    the top candidates to go pro.
    
    in general, how does this affect Michigan recruiting?  Why go to a
    school that has a ton of guys only a year older than you in the
    starting lineup?
    
    JD
15.1106the rationality shoul have been severity not he already got punishedCNTROL::CHILDSHulkster is Blubster w/out vitaminsMon Mar 30 1992 14:4310
 JD, small nit but Sellers wasn't called for anything last year. Given that
 Sellers repeatedly slammed Laettner he deserved what he got. Laettner on
 the other hand did get punished for what he did. I look at the severity
 of the offenses, Sellers was trying to harm Laettner, Laettner on the other
 hand was sending a message that he wasn't none too happy about being undercut.
 He didn't kick him as hard as he could have and wasn't trying to injury the
 other player in my mind so the punishment fits the crime here. No Suspension

 mike
15.1107RUGBY1::wayShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:0713
The bullshit about Seller's suspension is that no foul was ever called.
Hell, if CBS hadn't have shown the replay so many times nothing would
have come of it.

IMO, the NCAA at that point was like those dweebs who call up the PGA
when they see some rules infraction on TV....


Laettner is the fair-haired boy.  You won't see the NCAA reviewing any
of this to suspend him in his next game....


'Saw
15.1108RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:175
    I guess I get this feeling that say if, oh, Alonzo Mourning had stomped
    on a guy's stomach, that the refs would have chucked him out without
    batting a_eyelash.
    
    JD
15.1109It was a classicSHALOT::MEDVIDtwisting in the waterMon Mar 30 1992 15:334
    All this talk of the Laettner incident is taking away from what was one
    of the greatest games in the history of the NCAA tournament.  Shame.
    
    	--dan'l
15.1110Laettner is the root of all of American's problemsRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:3810
    Dan'l
    
    It was a great game.  But there were lots of great games in the
    tourney.   Georgia Tech was in a few of them.  The tech-Memphis State
    game was a great game.    And incidents like Laettner's do take away
    from the game.  There is no place for cheap shots like that.  His
    stomping, IMO, detracts from his last second shot.  Shows that cheaters
    cain win - the 'merican way.
    
    JD
15.1111Can't wait for nexted weekend...SASE::SZABOFrank Way is the write-in way!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:387
    I agree dan'l.  It's also a shame that all the negatives about the
    teams seem to be brought up, nothing good, nothing positive.  Doesn't 
    anybody enjoy anything anymore?  Personally, I've found this to be the
    most enjoyable March Madness in quite some time...
    
    Hawk
    
15.1112WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MDonnie Baseball is a legendMon Mar 30 1992 15:408
    
    
             Oh Definitely JD Mourning would probably get jail time. I want
    Duke to beat Indiana but the NCAA should remain consistent and seeing
    they bounced Sellers for a game Christy should be gone too.
    
    
     Chappy...
15.1113RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:4425
    Hawk -
    
    For you.
    
    Wasn't it great seeing Cincy and Memphis State battling for the Final
    Four?  Two schools that arent' among the 'normal' power elite.   
    
    Was Georgia Tech in the most exciting games of the tourney, or what.  
    And Travis Best is a PLAYER.  
    
    If you can't get to a TV, the radio coverage of the NCAA's is
    excellent.  I enjoyed it.
    
    Anfernee Hardaway is a hoops player.  A little out of control at times,
    but the man can pass.  
    
    Van Excel and Jones are great players on the Bearcats.   
    
    Calipiri and Pitino seem to be both cut from the same mold.  Pitino's
    comments after the loss to Duke were very good.  A loss like that
    shouldn't be the end of the world.
    
    JD
    
    
15.1114Laetner with a line through himJURAN::MCKAYMon Mar 30 1992 15:459
    Sellars did not deserve the suspension.  I loved poor little Chrissy
    taking a few forearms to the head.
    
    Laetner won't be suspended, should he be? Yes, since Sellars was the
    precedent has been set.  I'd rather no one ever was suspended for
    any tourney game unless fighting was the cause.  I want to see Duke
    lose with the team intact!
    
    Jimbo
15.1115RUGBY1::wayShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:4713
Laettner should be gone.


Asked Denny what I kept saying at the Game on Saturday, everytime 
Svoboda or Pressley tried to goon it up with the Broons:

		Cheaters Never Prosper


At least that's the way it's supposed to work....


'Saw
15.1116Much better, JD. Didn't that feel good now? :-) SASE::SZABOFrank Way is the write-in way!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:511
    
15.1117:-) :-) :-)SCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Mon Mar 30 1992 15:593
How was the coverage on CBC, JD ???

Bob Hunt
15.1118RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 16:018
    Bob -
    
    HAHAHAH.  The CBC  had coverage of teh Ice Skating Champeenships, and
    the curling, and evena  report on the softball.  And hockey.
    
    JD
    
    
15.1119Christian Laimbeer?SASE::SZABOFrank Way is the write-in way!Mon Mar 30 1992 16:1114
    > How was the coverage on CBC, JD ???
    
    Had I not seen it for myself (on CBS), I would've been envisioning the 
    Choirboy doing a triple-inverted-double-secret suplex on the Kentucky 
    guy from JD's apparent outrage.  Maybe that's what CBC did show?  :-)
    
    On a serious note, from an NBA perspective, is this display of
    aggression of Laettner's good, bad, or indifferent?  In other words,
    does his "stock" rise in the eyes of the teams that have a shot at
    picking him, or does it hurt him?  IMO, if I was a GM, I'd view it
    favorably...
    
    Hawk
    
15.1120RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 16:2313
    Haawk -
    ONly thing - if he tried that in the NBA he'd get his butt kicked. 
    Every team has some sort of enforcer type - can you imagine him doing
    that to PHilly, or Detroit, of Chicago?  Someone would mop the floor
    with his face.
    
    Of course, the jury's out on his pro stock, IMO.  Mainly due to Duke's
    track record for pros.  Alarie and Ferry come to mind right away.  I'm
    not sure he's physical enoubht ot play inside with the really big boys
    in the NBA.   But he's a talent.   Perhaps he should follow Ferry's
    lead and opt for the ravioli circuit.
    
    JD
15.11216'-11" with an outside shot == NBASCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Mon Mar 30 1992 16:4022
15.1122CNTROL::CHILDSHulkster is Blubster w/out vitaminsMon Mar 30 1992 16:4510
 I don't know JD you might be the only one in that jury. Ferry and Aliare
 were statsman glamour boys. They were never able to raise their own or
 their teams level of play when the game was on the line. Laettner gets the
 tough board for ya, blocks a few shots, does whatever his team needs out
 of him to win. Bottom line is he takes the game personally with his heart
 the other two never could. He's got the tools, he's got the heart I don't
 see him missing or needing the spagetti league....

 mike
15.1123COBRA::BRYDIEJulie's in the Drug SquadMon Mar 30 1992 16:487
   Laettner is a leadpipe cinch to be a lottery pick. As far as any
  comparisons to Ferry or Alarie, Laettner has a national title under
  his belt, 'nuff said. Is he cocky and arrogant ? Yeah, but he's as got
  as good a combination of the inside and outside game as anyone in 
  college ball.
    
15.1124NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Mar 30 1992 16:5928
    
> Before this season, I would have had the same hesitations about his pro 
> stock given Ferry's apparent flop but Laettner went out this past summer 
> and developed a college trey.  He led the country, I believe, in trey 
> accuracy.   The NBA will salivate over that skill.    Depending on team 
> needs, he's a lottery pick.   Probably top 5 but could go somewhere 
> between 7 and 10 just as easily.
    
    I would be stunned if Laettner falls from the top 5 picks.  I think
    the NBA types believe he's for real.  They'll overlook his lack of
    bulk for his height and his shooting touch.  Height alone has prompted 
    NBA teams to draft complete stiffs fairly high, and Laettner has proved 
    that he's no stiff.
    
    All the talk about Laettner's indiscretion in Saturday's game does not
    detract one iota from the greatness of the game, in my opinion.  If 
    anything it'll just make it more memorable, providing one more unusual 
    incident and a little bit of controversy for the ages to a game that 
    already had so much that was out of the ordinary.  What happened 
    shouldn't or needn't be forgotten and Laettner forgiven just because 
    he turned out to be the hero later in the game.  There's no reason to 
    have to portray the winners as good guys just to make a better story 
    of a great story.  I don't know if Laettner does or doesn't fit the 
    role (and really don't care), but sometimes the guys in the black hats 
    win too...
    
    glenn
      
15.1125but Joubert graduated, right?DTIF::MCEVOYMon Mar 30 1992 17:1219
    I agree with the previous replys. I don't think Sellers deserved to
    be suspended either, but the NCAA should be consistant. But at the same
    time, I don't want Duke to be shorthanded, that would take away from
    the eventual winners. Maybe they should just make him shave his
    sideburns... 
    
    Laettner is a much better player than I ever thought he was, but he
    has absolutely no class. I hope he ends up in Sacramento where I never
    have to see him again. 
    
    Webber outplayed Laettner in the game in Ann Arbor. Both players have
    gotten better since then. It would be great finale.
    
    Michigan has at least one more year in the spotlight. I hope that the
    current players have learned something from Eric Turner and Sean
    Higgins. Good point about the recruiting, but they always seem to 
    bounce back. Since Frieder took over, I think they've only had really
    bad recruiting year (last year) when they bet the bank on Montross and
    lost. But then again, that one bad year was worth this year, eh?  
15.1126Could beSCNDRL::HUNTStop The ACC Tourney Now !!!Mon Mar 30 1992 17:1512
15.1127RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOABD - Anybody But Duke!Mon Mar 30 1992 17:2516
    What positioin will Lawtner play in the pros?   I'd dink he'd be more
    of a forward than a center. As Bob said, he'll go top 5, depending on
    who comes out early.   I think he's a team-dependent type pick -
    inotherwords, I don't expect stardom no matter what - but if he gets
    into the right position, he'll do okay.  One team that would be okay
    for him would be Philly - if they keep Barkley.  But even then I'm not
    too sure.  Of course, he'd be a perfect Celtic [isfh].
    
    He'd be perfect for Golden State - but he'll be long gone.  With
    Nelson's offense, he'd be a weapon.  He'll turn moldy if he goes to
    places like Milwaukee.
    
    I'd like to see as the small forward on the KNicks, but he'd be too
    slow to cover some most of the small forwards in the league.
    
    JD
15.1128Take it where it belongsSHALOT::MEDVIDtwisting in the waterMon Mar 30 1992 17:395
    Hey, guys, how about taking this talk over to the ACC note where it
    belongs.  This note should be left for the deserving Fab Five and the
    clinic-giving Hoosiers...and for T's obfuscations on the title run.
    
    	--dan'l
15.1129ROYALT::ASHEThe V X'z boyz rool!Mon Mar 30 1992 18:187
    Yeah, otherwise, dan'l and I will talk about UNCC, their Golddiggers,
    Marlu Dottin and the rest of the team... (ha ha)...
    
    Still can't see how everyone can get on Laettner's case and not mention
    the head butt Jent laid on Howard.  Superfly Snuka or Dusty Rhodes
    would have been proud...
    
15.1130Fabulous 4 includes a FAB 5 whatayaknow!!!CELTIK::R_QUINNTue Mar 31 1992 00:3825
    
    .-1
    That head butting incident showed some maturity on Howard's part. 
    Early in the year he might have gotten himself kicked outta the game
    'cause of retaliation.  Could be because the ref. got there in a hurry
    just as well.
    
    The FAB 5 are playing considerably better defense at this point in the
    season.  That window of dissarray is getting smaller(ex. OSU 11-0 run)
    and they have gotten to the point where they won't let that run take
    them out of the game.  I thought the refs. were going to take the game
    Friday and suv it on a platta.
    
    The 'rines will love playing a team like cincinnati who likes the open
    court kind of game.  Cincinnati would be playing Michigan right into a
    Champeenship game.  I think Michigan would rather play Duke than IU but
    would have confidence against either.  Overtime loss to Duke early in
    the year and Avenged a loss to IU in Crisler arena.  Only IU is hitting
    on all cylinders now.
    
    GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BlUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    Roy L.
    
    Congrats Cincinnati, IU, and Duke fans  
15.1131DTIF::MCEVOYTue Mar 31 1992 12:382
    Cincinatti could give Michigan a run for their money, this game is
    certainly not a lock. Anyone see a point spread yet?
15.1132MONGUS::BRYDIEJulie's in the Drug SquadTue Mar 31 1992 13:185
    
    >> Anyone see a point spread yet?
    
       According to this morning's Globe, Michigan is a three point
       favorite and Duke is a two point favorite.
15.1133Duke favored; see The LineHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelTue Mar 31 1992 15:050
15.1134A hand for Steve FisherCELTIK::R_QUINNWed Apr 01 1992 22:0714
    Fab Five seem to have a decent following amid the fresh success.  I
    think that something however small has been overlooked.  The coaching
    of Steve Fisher.  I think he looked absolutely like a terrible coach
    early to mid season but as time goes on he looks better and better. 
    Granted he has some awsome talent but they are freshman and very few
    have taken freshmen this far.  Many coaches wouldn't have the balls to
    start 5 freshmen(ie tobaca ruins).  It is apparent that Fisher has been
    teaching by the defenses the wolves are playing and the better shot
    selections that are happening.  I think he did a good job of not
    suppressing all of their talents and allowed them to make some early
    mistakes.  While not a great X and O guy I think Fisher's getting
    better.
    
    Roy L. 
15.1135HYDRA::HAUSRATHBearCats 2 wins awayThu Apr 02 1992 12:349
    
    Don't take the BearCats lightly.. Michigan fans.  The Cats should show 
    the Fab-5 some of the tightest pressure D they've seen all year, and 
    it'll be interesting to see how the youngsters react.  
    
    Hopefully, the Fab-5 is taking the BearCats as lightly as their fans 
    seem to be...
    
    /Jeff    
15.1136I'd like to see Fisher bald...DTIF::MCEVOYThu Apr 02 1992 12:364
    Howard and King are supposed to join Webber and Rose in the shaved head
    club for saturday, Jackson says no way.
    
    
15.1137ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewThu Apr 02 1992 16:179
    It should be pointed out that Cincinnati features eight juco
    transfers on its squad.  The Big10 has a rule that requires
    jucos who at matriculation did not meet the Big10's academic
    guidelines to sit out a year as if they were Prop48.  This rule
    expires in August, and, if the NCAA continues to endorse low
    academics, may be forced to suspend this rule, which is unique
    among power conferences.
    
    Big10 Bigot Tom
15.1138scandalousHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelThu Apr 02 1992 16:215
What's this "may be forced" stuff, T? You mean that in the interest in
money and more money the Big10 might compromise its integrity and lower
itself to the NCAA standards?

TTom
15.1139GOOOOOOOO BlUUUUUUUEEEEEEEECELTIK::R_QUINNThu Apr 02 1992 16:5712
    RE: .1135
    
    I don't think the Bearcats are being taken lightly but I do think they
    have a general lack of respect.  I think that's due more than anything
    to lack of press clippings.  Of the final four, Duke is the reigning
    National Champ, Indiana has Bob Knight, Michigan has five well
    publicized freshman but Cincinnati has generate a marquee appeal.  It's
    apparent that they are a good basketball team at 29-4 but they will
    have to earn respect all the way to a championship.
    
    Roy L.
    
15.1140ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewThu Apr 02 1992 16:5716
    That's r-right, TTom.  The Big10 may be forced to lower its 
    quality standards in order to keep up with the other power
    conferences, you know, like the Big Lease and the Almost Close.
    
    Competitive fairness.  Now, doan git me wrong, this'll have no
    effect on the Michigans and Ohio States who're rolling big-time
    on the recruiting front.  But may prove necessary for Bob, whom
    everybody agrees is a awful recruiter at his level, to dip into
    the juco ranks in order to tab that elusive nukewidebody or maybe
    a center who cain move his feet without looking like he's walking
    in a vat a molasses.
    
    I say dump the rule and help the Minnesotas and Wisconsins and
    Illinoises and Indianas try to keep up with Ann Arbor and Columbus.
    
    Big10 Bigot Tom
15.1141Let's have a little perspective...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 02 1992 17:1917
    > Competitive fairness.  Now, doan git me wrong, this'll have no
    > effect on the Michigans and Ohio States who're rolling big-time
    > on the recruiting front.  But may prove necessary for Bob, whom
    
    Don't forget about my main mens Paterno and Parkhill!  Those two are
    going to lend a whole new meaning the term NukeWideBodyStud (well,
    maybe Paterno moreso than Parkhill...)  ;-)
    
    By the way, dealing with more important matters than this Big Ten hoops
    business, the grid skeds for 1993-94 have been released: State will be
    taking on everyone 'cept creampuffs Wisconsin and Purdue each of the
    first two years.  Indoctrination the right mainly way-- including the
    beast Michigan at home in '93!
    
    glenn
    
15.1142Lets check it outCELTIK::R_QUINNThu Apr 02 1992 18:175
    Glen,
    
    If time and desire exist can ya post that grid sched. in note 15.
    
    Roy L.
15.1143-.1 make that note 16CELTIK::R_QUINNThu Apr 02 1992 18:351
    
15.1144Indiana has most talent of Final FourHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelThu Apr 02 1992 18:439
What's this I read?

Under the title of "No Big Macs", a blurb reported that Cincinnati had no
MacDonald's all americans. Duke and Michigan each have 4.

Indiana, that no talent, white guys can't jump, type of team lead the
Final Four with 5, count 'em, 5 Big Mac Genuine All-Ams.

TTom
15.1145Great-MidWest proved to be one of toughest conf. in the NCAAHYDRA::HAUSRATHBearCats 2 wins awayThu Apr 02 1992 19:1218
    
    re:-1
    
    Not too terribly suprising.. Cincy gets by on the strength of their 
    TEAM defense, not on the ability of individual superstars.  
    
    Of their four losses, two were by 1 point, in games they never should 
    have lost (Michigan St. and DePaul).  The other two were @DePaul and 
    Indiana.  Tough wins on their schedule included in-conference
    match-ups with UAB, Memphis State, and Marquette and out of conference
    games against the likes of Xavier OH (granted they were somewhat down 
    this year) and Miami (OH).  I'm sure there were other tough games that
    I can't remember and a number of cup-cakes too.   
    
    Guess we'll know how they stack up against the "big boys" (or should
    that be "baby boys"?) on Saturday. 
    
    /Jeff  
15.1146STRATA::CAPPELThu Apr 02 1992 23:319
    One of them AA's TTom is sitting on the end of the bench in street 
    clothes; Pat Graham their best outside shooter was redshirted this 
    year.
    
    So Duke, IU and Michigan each have 4.  Cincy just has 8 very good 
    college jucos on their squad.
    
    IU has the style to give Duke problems.  If they shoot better than 50%,
    I think they will win.
15.1147Who knows? They *could* be on a rollANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightSat Apr 04 1992 18:568
    Wail, I aim off to the Dome in a few minutes.  I give the 
    disciplined Hoosiers 1 outta 3 in this one.  If they play
    like the UCLA game they cain do it.  Here's hoping for good
    shooting and no fould trouble up front...
    
    Wish me luck!
    
    MrT
15.1148I *HATE* B-ball withdrawal!DYPSS1::SIMPSONSun Apr 05 1992 16:2231
	Well, it was a disappointing end to an up-and-down season.   The 
Hoosiers played a nice first half, even without getting Cheaney into the
action, but the bad judgement when they had the ball and an 8-point lead
with no shot clock at the end of the first half was the clear turning point.
If they'd held the ball for the last shot and gone in with an 8-10 point lead,
MAYBE they could have weathered Duke's run at the start of the second half (if
there was one) and played Monday night.  As it was the quick, bad shot turned
into 3 on the other end, and they were scrambling to hold onto the 5-point
lead.  They then reacted badly to some adversity, as they have so often this
year; the shooting went south, as it has so often this year; and they ended up
with a mountain that was too big to climb.

	You have to give the Dukies credit, of course.  As always, when the
Blue Devils need a player to step up and make the plays, someone responds.
They look very beatable, but they just keep on winning.  And, as I've often 
said, they don't give style points in b-ball.  They just look at the final 
score and see who has the most.

	On the positive side, the 3-game run to the Final Four was as much
fun as I've ever had watching Indiana play, and they played better in that
stretch than any IU team in a long time.  And, the fact that the Hoosiers 
were able to turn around the end-of-season slump and make a great run in the 
tournament may bode well for next season.  The players most responsible for
that turn-around will be back, and overall they may gain more than they lose.
PGraham will be a big help offensively, but they'll have to find a way to 
replace Eric Anderson's interior defense.

tom
	

15.1149LUNER::BROOKSYeah, da Tew Yutes ....Sun Apr 05 1992 20:274
    Looks like Knight pulled a reverse-Smif' by not putting in that kid
    bomber (I forget his name) until too late. Three straight 3's, the last
    one was a double-clutch job with a main hanging all over him. I had to
    admit, that last minute was great stuff, pity it didn't go to OT ...
15.1150Great GameRDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 06 1992 12:0315
    Really impressed by the IU/Duke game. Great intensity by both teams.
    Hard to say which team was better. In hindsight, many may fault KB
    (King Bob) but his outburst "could" have stopped Duke's mementum, also.
    I think KB sensed his team was losing it and tried to fire them up.
    'Course, KB bashers will simply look at the "T" called on him and blame
    him for the loss.
    
    Coach K continues to impress me. This guy is one heck of a motivator
    albeit totally different than KB.
    
    Looks like Duke forward Brian Davis is out for tonights game. Duke's
    best defensive player will be missed.
    
    Rich
    
15.11518^)CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 06 1992 13:296
    Yea Doc,
    That kid throwin up them three pointers for AhU was clutch. Must
    come from good stock. Whatsisname??
    
    MikeL
    
15.1152Good gameSHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubMon Apr 06 1992 15:5116
 You were right, Po'.  They weren't making a run.   Too bad because they
 would have made a great story.  And I think Knight would have out-coached
 Fisher before the game even started.
 
 Duke sure can turn up the defensive heat when they need to and they sure
 as hell needed to on Saturday.   Knight's first-half effort was sublime
 right up until they let the 12-point lead slip back to 5.
 
 Did Billy Packer really say that no one squares up on the trey better than
 Damon Bailey ???   I guess Bobby Hurley wasn't listening 'cause he torched
 the Hoosiers from treyville.
 
 A good game and the 2nd time in a row that a student has beaten the
 mentor.
 
 Bob Hunt
15.1153ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Apr 06 1992 19:533
    Er, CoachK was 0-1 vs. Bob going into Friday's game.
    
    Big10 Tom
15.1154ClarificationSHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubMon Apr 06 1992 19:589
15.1155CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 06 1992 20:009
    So T,
    How's about yer semifinal eyewitness analysis from da luxury box?
    Hope you was all bedecked in red.
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
    
15.1156ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Apr 06 1992 20:0139
    Whoa, wait a minute.  The TO called was NOT called on Bob.  
    It was called on the bench cuz two guys on the end of the 
    bench leaped up at a non-call on a Hurley play as they were 
    going up court.  Amazingly, the ref himself informed both 
    Calbert and Bob that the T was for jumping off the bench, and
    not for anything that was said cuz the ref sez he didn't  hear
    anything.
    
    You're right on one thing though, it *did* prove to be the game.
    
    Amazing.  Certain teams spend the entire game standing and 
    giving officiating signals in protest, and in a game a that 
    magnitude the ref blows the whistle for two players jumping
    up, giving no signals, and saying nothing.
    
    The game was over in the first 3 minutes anyway.  All those soft
    foul calls did this:
    
    - Put nearly the entire starting lineup on the bench, which meant
      IU was shuttling the rest a the way and never got back into the
      flow.
    
    - Put Duke into the 1-and-1 with 14:30 left.
    
    - Put Duke into the 2-shot foul situation with 12 minutes left.
    
    And Indiana still nearly pulled it off.  Both Bob and Calbert made
    veiled references to the officiating, but would speak no further.
    
    The Cheaney charging call was bogus.  It was right in front a me,
    and it was a move he's made his entire career: fake, drive the baseline
    and jump straight up for the J and shoot.  Trouble was, a Dukie came
    up on him and they rubbed a bit and even though Calbert was in the air 
    before the guy moved in and the contact was minor and incidental he 
    got called for the foul (his 4th).
    
    Go Blue.
    
    MrT
15.1157Blue definitely wins it tonight ... unless OT, then tomorrowSHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubMon Apr 06 1992 20:1216
15.1158ROYALT::ASHEEasy come easy go, will you let me go?Mon Apr 06 1992 21:383
    I go thru all these notes and no-one mentions Michigan?  Fine, no
    bandwagon jumpers allowed without a note from Mom...
    
15.1159EXCUSES 101RAVEN1::OGLESBYBlue HeavenMon Apr 06 1992 22:0820
     EXCUSES, EXCUSES, AND MORE EXCUSES.
    
    Face it weasels, Bob Knight choked big time.
    
    Tell me this..  
     How can you have a ten point lead in the first half, and then get
    outscored 33-8, without making adjustments.
    
    Don't get me wrong, I think Knight is a great coach, but if I did
    not know better I would have sworn the Knight was the student.
    
    As far as the "T", Knight should of had better control of his players!!
    
    
    So what I'm getting at weasels is for those of you who said Dean Smith
    choked against #1 seeded Ohio State team after having the lead in the
    first half, The same can be said about Bob Knight..
    
    Big "O"
    
15.1160Oh well...RAVEN1::B_ADAMSWilkes county N.C.!Mon Apr 06 1992 22:149
15.1161LUNER::BROOKSYeah, da Tew Yutes ....Mon Apr 06 1992 22:275
    Lasted year, Snuff gets big T ... UNC loses to mentee ....
    1992, Bob Fright gets big T ...IU loses to mentee ...
    
    That ought to keep a certain debate quiet for at least a few hours ...
    :-)
15.1162Two for the Wolves'CELTIK::R_QUINNTue Apr 07 1992 00:5115
    
    Time to go witness the second coming to the maize and blue championship
    dance.  I kind of though we'd be dancing with IU(which would have been
    a bit more skeery to me).  With the emotional edge of knowing they
    should have beaten Duke earlier in the year I think the wolves will be
    National Champs 3 hours from now.  It should be a great game but hope
    this on doesn't fall in the hands of the ref's like a couple of others
    did on Duke's road into the championship.  I won't say it was
    deliberate or intentional or even benefits to a reigning champion the
    calls seem to have been in favor of Duke the whole tournament.  I
    saying this as a non-detractor of Duke although I am a big TEN(11) fan.
    
    GOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEE
    
    Roy L.
15.1163LJOHUB::CRITZTue Apr 07 1992 11:305
    	Duke wins 71-51.
    
    	I'd have been happy if Michigan had won.
    
    	Scott
15.1164tough lossDDIF::MCEVOYTue Apr 07 1992 12:347
    Congrats to Duke, those Hills just keep coming at you.
    
    Good season for the Wolverines, next year will be great.
    
    That alley-oop from Rose to King in the first half was fabulous!
    
    -dennis
15.1165COBRA::BRYDIEThat's when I reach for my revolverTue Apr 07 1992 13:0017
 
  re .1156
      

  >>  The menu?  Tellya what, it won't be the sour grapes that UMASS
  >>  fans are dining on today.  Their coach is making a fool out a 
  >>  himself, way outside of the box, a good solid call is made, he
  >>  takes it like a main, sorta, and now all this fine whine about 
  >>  how "the flow of the game changed."  
    
  >>  Poppycock.  Kaintuck was on their way to a W as it was and all
  >>  the justified call did was give Raftery and Francesa a morsel to
  >>  mull over on a otherwise dull night.
    
      Remember when you wrote this about UMASS ? Well just substitute Indiana
      for UMASS and it fits to a "T".
    
15.1166STRATA::CAPPELTue Apr 07 1992 14:5816
    Re: Doc
    
    Need to get your facts straight(as usual :-) before spewing such
    drivel.  Knight did not receive a technical the IU bench did, look
    it up in the boxscore.
    
    Re: Big O
    
    Anyone that writes such nonsense without providing any insight on how
    Knight choked, especially since he had his 4 best players in foul
    trouble(Graham, Cheaney, Bailey and Henderson) with 4 fouls apiece,
    really should be ignored.  But humor me with your in-depth analysis
    on how Knight choked in a 3 point game to a better team with 4 of
    his best players shackled with foul trouble and only having a bench
    of 10 players.  Please provide specific examples.
    
15.1167STRATA::CAPPELTue Apr 07 1992 15:0825
    I personally wasn't as disappointed in IU's loss as I thought I'd be.
    Thought Knight's gameplan was brilliant and gave IU a chance to win
    even though they played terribly in the 2nd half.
    
    I thought the foul trouble really hurt IU in the second half as Cheaney
    and Graham played very soft on Grant Hill who proceeded to eat the
    Hoosiers alive on the offensive boards during a key stretch.
    
    IU held Laettner to a career low 8 points which reminds me of how a
    Knight led team held Jordan to a career low game as well.
    
    Anderson's shot at the end of the first half provided a potential 5
    point turnaround and killed IU's momentum.   Definately was a stupid
    play.
    
    Officiating played a role but was an overwhelming factor.  The decision
    to call so many charging calls hurt IU as they drive the basket more
    than Duke.  33 fouls were called on Duke, while only 18 were called
    on IU.  Without the foul trouble we might have seen a different game.
    However I do feel that Duke was the better team with as good a coach.
    
    Coach K is one hell of a coach and will go down as one of the best in
    history of college ball.
    
    
15.1168How straight is this fact ? :-)EARRTH::BROOKSRIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992Tue Apr 07 1992 15:501
    So Cap, why didn't we see Leary until there was a minute left ?
15.1169STRATA::CAPPELTue Apr 07 1992 16:1018
    Doc your basketball IQ has to be smaller than Woody Harrelson's 
    vertical jump :-) but I will answer your question as I am sympathetic
    with the basketball challenged. :-)
    
    Because he's not as talented as Graham, Bailey, Meeks, Reynolds,
    Cheaney, Anderson, Henderson or Nover and had played minimal minutes
    during the season.
    
    By saying that playing Todd Leary significant minutes just
    because he came in and hit 3 miracle bombs is one of the most
    ridiculous arguements that I have ever heard.  Leary is slow, plays
    terrible defense and basically made no contributions to a very 
    successful IU season.  Hell Matt Nover hit a 3 at the end of the
    game, should Knight have had Matt throw a few up since he has probably
    got a career 3-pt shooting pct. of 1.000(1-1)?
                                        

    
15.1170Gee Cap, ya coulda been a leetle nicer!CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 07 1992 16:221
    
15.1171I was just teasing, he knows that...STRATA::CAPPELTue Apr 07 1992 16:271
    
15.11728^)CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 07 1992 16:367
    No Cap!
    To Leary that is, the hail wif Doc!! 
    
    8^)'s
    
    MikeL
    
15.1173Good one Mike....STRATA::CAPPELTue Apr 07 1992 16:411
    
15.1174SYOMV::SPRAGUETue Apr 07 1992 16:4419
My .02,

  I though the officiating was real bad in the IU/Duke game. Alot has been said,
  about Calbert's 4th "charging" foul, quite possibly the worst call in tourney 
  history, but I think his first or second foul was an exact replica. Baily's
  fifth was weak. Like a peck on the wrist affected Cherekee Parks thunder
  dunk. I thoght BK himself might have to suit up in the last minute or so.

  Alright, enough whinnin. The single reason IU lost is because their guards
  decided to take the night off on the defensive end. If someone had stepped
  up and put one back in Hurley's face, or even sent him to the deck once or 
  twice maybe he would not have burried shot after open shot. As it was bobby 
  hoisted Crissy and the rest of the devils on his back and carried them to
  victory.

  Did anyone hear that load bang saturday night ? Was that Crissy's stock 
  droppin ?  Maybe Danny Ferry could hook him up with that agent in Italy.

   Stan
15.1175ROYALT::ASHEEasy come easy go, will you let me go?Tue Apr 07 1992 17:147
    Congrats to Duke and Michigan... the foul trouble cost them in the
    second half.  Couldn't play as aggressive defensively and they lost
    their rhythm on offense.  Duke deserved to win....
    
    Go Blue next year!  As Webber said, there won't be a team with frosh
    like this for a long time...
    
15.1176ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Apr 07 1992 17:3934
    Stan, I gotta disagree on the guard defense.  It was clear that 
    the plan was to sag on Laettner and jump out on the perimeter 
    shooters and hope that Hurley pacifically wouldn't uncork a career
    game, which he did.  He misses a couple a those treys and the
    Hoosiers beat a great team with Matt Nover logging heavy minutes.
    It was the best plan but didn't pan out.
    
    Cap, I threw away my box score and admit right here and now that I've
    been running some chronic hangovers the last four daze (college buds
    in town) but I thought IU got called for 42 fouls and Duke 18.  Anybody
    got the box?
    
    Anytime you send the opposition into 1-and-1 with 14:30 and two shot
    fouls with 12 minutes it's hard.  I cain see a clearly overmatched team
    that grabbing and hanging on for dear life ending up in such foul
    straits, but Indiana more than held their own underneath, outrebounding
    the taller quicker Blue Devils.
    
    Todd Leary is the last guard off the bench because he's awful on 
    defense and has trouble maintaining possession of the pill against 
    tough defenders.
    
    It was good to see the Big10 proved the best hoops league, not so nice
    to see Fisher playing into K's hands with his stupid offensive plan,
    trying to run a Duke/IU-like pattern offense where the spacing was
    awful, the passing tentative, picks non-existent, and shot selection
    wretched.
    
    Fisher shoulda gone run n' gun from the outset.  If he just HAD to play
    a classic offense then he shoulda benched Rose for Talley after the
    first TO, by which time it was clear that Jalen is incapable of running
    a disciplined offense (and not a running offense).
    
    MrT
15.1177:^) BSS::JCOTANCHTue Apr 07 1992 18:503
    Who'd play a guy with a name like Leary??
    
    Joe
15.1178AhemCTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 07 1992 19:4020
    Wail, ifn. he cain't play D, is slow, gives up the pill whence
    under pressure, but cain shoot treys, he definitely is related
    to these poor East Coast shanty Irish.  And he's intelligent, for
    sure, attendin' the best school in thease here US of A fer furthering
    his basketball knowledge and larning under THE Yoda(fer BBall).
    Now if he was football-minded, I'd suspect, with his inherent
    brilliance, he'd a opted fer the Mecca a coupla hundred miles
    northward.
    
    Fine state Indiana, Basketball prowess down south, football prowess
    up north. Just shows ya these Leary's know what's bested fer them,
    yessir.
    
    
    8^),
    MikeL
    
    
    
    
15.1179I've got your vertical leap ! :-)EARRTH::BROOKSRIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992Tue Apr 07 1992 19:5112
    Cap, if Leary is slow, caint play D, but can hit the three - what is
    the problem ?
    
    According to your cohort MrT, he's the perfect IU player. In fack, he
    sounds suspicously like Steve Alford ... :-)
    
    Face it Cap, The General didn't whip out the right weapon at the right
    time, and beetch-slapped by his mentee.
    
    Pantheon my a** ..... :-)
    
    Doc
15.1180ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Apr 07 1992 20:1114
    Hey Mike, Jeff George is from central Indiana, Indy!  Now
    *that's* prowess!
    
    Speaking of intelligent basketball players, how in the hell
    cain juniors and seniors have undeclared majors?
    
    The Hoosiers couldn't win the Final4, but they woulda won a
    quiz show matchup with the other three, with a starting lineup
    featuring a molecular biology major, three biz school kids (Calbert,
    Reynolds, Nover), and only one Criminal Justice major and one 
    sociology major (a favorite with Duke and Bearcat players) on
    the squad.
    
    MrT
15.1181CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 07 1992 20:2214
    T,
    I was wonderin the same thing. How CAIN a jr. or sr have an undeclared
    major?? Makes no sense to me. Mebbe they're "on loan". Sheesh
    
    Speakin of Indy, what's the name of the big Catholic HS there? Coupla
    whacky ND boys in me dorm ( fine lads by the names of McDonald and
    Loughery) came from an Indy Catholic HS. Mebbe you went to same?
    And I can't remember for the hail of me what the name of the famous
    Indy bar that dishes in all ND games (football und BBall)! Got a
    great rep. 
    
    MikeL 
    
    
15.1182Cathedral H.S., or Brebeuf H.S. (Jesuit prep)ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Apr 07 1992 20:261
    
15.1183Ah, was Cathedral!CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSTue Apr 07 1992 20:271
    
15.1184ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightTue Apr 07 1992 20:4932
    Interesting star gazing over the weekend, especially last
    night, when we ended up crashing CBS' private party at
    Boccio's (a upscale yuppoid sports bar downtown) without
    even realizing it!  MrT's objective observations:
    
    Leslie Visser has skinny legs... Mike Francesa, whom we 
    stood near at the bar for quite a while, is a genuine nice
    guy, the kind a New York salt a the earth good guy that never
    gets talked about, this dude is no phony... Pat O'Brien is
    without a doubt the biggest egomaniac I've ever encountered
    personally.  There were legendary stories already about him 
    after the Series, but when he came walking in (with a big
    bodyguard obsequiously brushing the stairs free of dust so
    Pat's Bally's would touch no dirt) smoking a stogie, he was
    emanating a "aura zone" so wide that you woulda thunk that
    it was John Lennon or Michael Jordan or President Bush coming
    in.  A truly amazing display... Bill Walton is tall.  Real
    tall... Billy Packer doesn't do bars, he came to the entrance
    and had a flunky go get Francesa to go get something... Did
    you know that a CBS Sports big-wig (he seemed like he was up
    in the org by all the beautiful blondes fawning to such a ugly
    old main) went to Duke, and worked totally bedecked in Duke
    sports wear?... 
    
    I'll never forget O'Brien's entrance.  Nobody will.  A half-hour
    after he swept through even the bartenders were shaking their haids
    saying, "cain you believe it?  Unbelievable!"
    
    Pat should move to west LA where they don't notice craven egomania
    on such a grand scale.
    
    MrT
15.1185Oh well maybe 3 more shotsCELTIK::R_QUINNTue Apr 07 1992 21:459
    I thought Fisher knew to dance with the one that brought ya. 
    Changin O strategies with frosh aint the same as veteran squads. I hope
    it was a lesson well learned.
    
    Somehow wolverines fans should be adjusted to the big game loses but in
    this game I guess being a 6point underdog should have keyed lower
    expectations.
    
    Roy L.
15.1186ABC and NBC's 6 whole games don't cut itBSS::JCOTANCHTue Apr 07 1992 21:464
    Hey T, you shoulda told one of those CBS big-wigs that they need to
    start doing college football again.
    
    Joe
15.1187:*)RAVEN1::B_ADAMSWilkes county N.C.!Tue Apr 07 1992 22:2910
15.1188ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Apr 08 1992 02:065
    Speaking a anal orifi, Pat O'Brien goes down in my book as the
    biggest flamer I've ever encountered in person, and I've been
    around the pits at a lot a F1 races!
    
    MrT
15.1189If you only knew...RAVEN1::B_ADAMSWilkes county N.C.!Wed Apr 08 1992 02:386
15.1190tell me more about Ms. Visser.....;^)7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Wed Apr 08 1992 03:551
    
15.1191AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhWed Apr 08 1992 12:3017
15.1192Duke not receiving the credit they deserve...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 08 1992 13:3730
    
    Francessa's unpopular because he tells it like he knows and feels it, 
    and that upsets people.  The guy's one of the most knowledgeable college
    football/basketball analysts around.  Others might be better with one
    or the other, but I don't who is more well-rounded at both (and let's 
    not hear any more of this sacrilege about bringing back the totally
    vacuous Brett Musburger to pump the hype back up in these "events").
    I have no reason to dislike Mike Francessa even if he is from New
    York...  ;-)
    
    > Cap, I threw away my box score and admit right here and now that I've
    > been running some chronic hangovers the last four daze (college buds
    > in town) but I thought IU got called for 42 fouls and Duke 18.  Anybody
    > got the box?
 
    Is anyone going to up front and honest with us about this Duke
    favoritism business and tell us how many of the free throws came after 
    Indiana (or any of their other opponents in the tourney, Kentucky 
    excepted) sent player after player to the charity stripe after the Duke 
    lead became unmanageable?  Much has been made of the fact that Duke has
    dominated their opponents from the line in the past few years, but
    guess what?  When you're constantly winning you're constantly placed in
    the timeout-foul-timeout-foul bore that is college basketball's final
    minutes.  Once again in the Indiana game, I thought the game was fairly
    poorly officiated (all penetrations called for charging, for both
    teams), but was not the reason Duke won.  They won because they played
    great defense in the second half...
    
    glenn
    
15.1193FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 13:449
    Glenn, I have to agree with about Francesa.  I don't always agree with
    what he says, but he at least has an opinion and expresses it.  I also
    think he's quite a knowledgeable analyst.
    
    It's funny - people bemoan the banality of most analysts and then when
    there is one who is vocal and opinionated, he's disliked for being that
    way.
    
    John
15.1194Good point, NinjSCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 08 1992 14:237
15.1195PerspectiveFSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 14:566
    And remember - Francesa's opinions are no more or less valid than
    yours, he just has a bigger forum in which to express them.  (it's just
    like Hall of Fame voting, or the Oscars or the MVP - your opinions are
    no more or less valid than the ones that count towards these awards).
    
    John
15.1196SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 08 1992 15:482
      Listen to Francesa on WFAN, he's the voice of reason on THAT shaw.
                                        Denny
15.1197STRATA::CAPPELWed Apr 08 1992 16:4320
    
    Glenn,
                                 
    Duke hit 8 of 10 free throws at the end of the game when IU was
    fouling intentionally(Clark was 5-6, Parks was 1-2 and Hurley was
    2-2) so that would have left the foul difference at 28 - 18 Duke.
    In fact before the IU bench got the T, the foul situation in the 
    2nd half was 9-1 or 9-2 in favor of Duke with IU's 4 best players in
    foul trouble with 4 fouls apiece.
    
    Not saying that IU would have won this game as they shot terribly in
    the second half but it would have been nice to see if IU could have
    mounted an earlier comeback with their best lineup.  
    
    Duke was the better team.  I was happy with IU's performance in the
    tourney this year.  No sour grapes here as they certainly had enough
    opportunities to win that game.  If they had shot in the 2nd half as
    they did in the first, it would have been a 10 pt IU win.
    
    Cap.                         
15.1198Pat Knight kicked off IU team after arrestFORTSC::MOKThu Apr 09 1992 19:0523
Subject: Knight boots son from IU team after arrest for public intoxication
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 92 11:26:14 PDT
 
	BLOOMINGTON, Ind. (UPI) -- Indiana basketball Coach Bob Knight didn't
hestitate after his son, Pat, was arrested for public intoxication and
disorderly conduct.
	The younger Knight was kicked off the Hoosiers' basketball team, a
report said Thursday.
	Police confirmed that Pat Knight, 21, was arrested early Wednesday in
a car near a Bloomington tavern.
	Authorities said Knight was a passenger in a car whose driver was
stopped after leaving the tavern. Police said Knight was arrested after
becoming unruly.
	The Bloomington Herald-Times said Coach Knight kicked his son off the
team after learning of the arrest.
	Knight's office said the coach was out of town Thursday and
unavailable for comment.
	The university issued no statement but a source said no other
disciplinary action was planned against the younger Knight, who was
released from custody on his own recognizance later Wednesday.
	Knight, a sophomore, sat out the 1991-92 season as a redshirt. He
earlier played at Bloomington North High School and New Hampton Prep
School. He scored 39 points at Indiana as a freshman.
15.1199SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesThu Apr 09 1992 19:073
       you mean the IU seniors didn't get to decide the punishment like a
    certain ACC coach does it? 
                                    Denny
15.1200I could use some peace and quietCSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Apr 10 1992 02:3028

	Nothing double-secret about this punishment, fortunately or no.  So
far, no one's 100% sure on whether Pat Knight is PERMANENTLY off the team.
The talk shows and papers seem to think he is, but history might suggest he's
not.  Back in '78 when the "Great Marijuana Incident" occurred, the only
players permanently dropped were the three who lied about their participation.
The other two were suspended from the team for some length of time which I 
no longer remember.  

	So, in the last three weeks, we have:

	*  The "Great Banquet Scandal";

	*  The (ongoing) "Great Whip Controversy"; and,

	*  The "Coach Kicks Son Off Team" headlines


	Knight's getting a lot more early support on this one on the call-in
show I listen to than he did on the others, btw.


	Gosh, I wonder how recruiting will be this fall :^(

tom


15.1201settled?HBAHBA::HAASMental ModelFri Apr 10 1992 13:085
>	Gosh, I wonder how recruiting will be this fall :^(

I thought the consensus was that Bobby couldn't recruit, anyhow?

TTom
15.1202What's next? Pat transfers to NC?CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Apr 10 1992 13:319

	I don't think can't recruit is accurate, although some might disagree.
Certainly it's only a consensus if your opinion sample is small :^)

	But the "lowlight" tape opposing coaches use when they go up against 
Knight in a recruiting battle HAS to be on it's second cassette by now.

tom
15.1203another crushing rib-shotANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Apr 10 1992 14:5314
    Knight cain recruit fine, compared to, say, Minnesota or USC or 
    Villanova or St. John's or or Illinois or Pitt or Missouri or
    a lot a other big-time programs.  But, basically limiting himself
    to a 3-state recruiting ground, he's never moved the program up 
    to the top level, the Star Hells, SyrExcuses, Dukes, et al.
    
    One thing fer sure: Bob's consistent.  I was looking forward to 
    having Pat playing, he's kinda slow and a 'tweener size wise, but
    he cain flat shoot and plays tough on the boards/picks/D.  It's
    a setback for next year for sure.  And most quality players are
    already signed, so it'll be interesting to see whom he comes up
    with for a refill.
    
    Poor MrT 
15.1204CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Apr 10 1992 14:5711
	T

	Actually I'm glad Pat Knight won't be there (assuming he won't).  I
didn't like the idea of him being on the team anyway.  Seems to me that coach's
kids, ESPECIALLY non-star coach's kids, often have a negative impact on team
chemistry.

	There *should* be enough shooters to go around next year.

tom
15.1205DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Fri Apr 10 1992 15:225
    T and Tom.  Come now, haven't we seen instances in the past where Bob
    the Great has made hasty decisions!  No need to worry T, Pat Knight
    will be on the end of the bench next season.
    
    WILDCAT
15.1206The punishment is a bit harsh.SASE::SZABOFri Apr 10 1992 15:288
    Allie Maguire (McGuire?) certainly was no negative impact on his dad's
    Marquette Warriors!
    
    I also think that Pat will be back on the team next year, maybe not at
    the beginning of the season, but sometime shortly after, at least...
    
    Hawk
    
15.1207CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Apr 10 1992 15:3311

	True about McGuire.  On the other hand, walk-on Brian Donoher was a
big-time negative impact on Don Donoher's last University of Dayton team(s).

	I'd agree that being permanently banned would be harsh.  Wouldn't be
the first time Knight's overreacted, though, and he may hold his son to a
pretty high standard.

tom    

15.1208FSOA::JRODOPOULOSIntl. Business SupportFri Apr 10 1992 15:416
     >   Pat Knight, 21........a sophomore.....
    
          I guess Coach Knight did not pass his son any smart genes. :)
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
    Whose wearing his Duke stuff today
15.1209RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOYowza!Fri Apr 10 1992 16:205
    Having read some of the dribble in here from the Big Zero and Doctor
    Many Zeroes, I feel that my assessment that neither has a clue is
    correct.
    
    JD
15.1210maybe he needed some food in his belly...ROYALT::ASHEA mosquito... Yacopino...Fri Apr 10 1992 16:322
    So when's the banquet?
    
15.1211SYOMV::SPRAGUEMon Apr 13 1992 15:0411
Pat Knight and the Banquet will be back in '93.

As far as the recruiting goes, BK will never get the kids who couldn't play
in a disciplined system, and who wants 'em.  Let the Syracuse's and Depaul's
and the UNLV's and the Arkansas' and the LSU's have those selfish gunners. For 
the few, the proud, that are hoosier material, neither the banquet nor the Pat 
Knight debacle will change their mind.

my $.02

Stan.
15.1212SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Apr 13 1992 16:144
       Gee, no mention from MorT of Wisconson's hockey team going after the
    ref after the final game! Guess they chased him all the way down the
    tunnel. Thought that only happened in aCC land!
                              Denny
15.1213AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhMon Apr 13 1992 16:373
    	Typical BigTen behavior Denny.  Riot and fight when you lose.
    
    				/Don
15.1214ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Apr 13 1992 18:0815
    >I guess Coach Knight did not pass his son any smart genes. :^)
    >
    >John "D Cowboys" R.
    >Whose wearing his Duke stuff today
    
    Pat lost a year by going to a prep school, I think on the east
    coast.  Choate or one a those big-time schools.  Pat's older
    brother attended Stanford as a non-athlete.
    
    If we wanna talk scholar-athlete low-lights, how 'bout all those
    Sociology and Afro-American Studies majors on Duke; or how 'bout
    those undeclared juniors and seniors on Michigan; or maybe the
    All-Criminal Justice Bearcats, hmm?
    
    MrT
15.1215The hockey gods never forgetCTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 13 1992 18:228
    Wisconsin went after the ref after the champeenship game??
    HMMM. It took a long time but the hockey gods remember 1973 and
    the Badgers got their comeuppance finally! Lordy I wishes Bob Johnson
    was around AND at Wisconsin to experience "what goes around comes
    around." ( in a hockey sense mind you)
    
    MikeL
    
15.1216LUNER::BROOKSYour mother's an astronaunt ...Mon Apr 13 1992 18:361
    Tough love from BobKnight ... my thighs are a'shudderin' ....
15.1217PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Apr 13 1992 18:481
    And we all know where young Mr.Knight picked up his vocabulary ;^)
15.1218FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Apr 13 1992 19:163
    Pat Knight went to New Hampton Prep in Concord, NH.
    
    Ninj
15.1219FSOA::JRODOPOULOSIntl. Business SupportMon Apr 13 1992 20:048
    Hey T, what is this adoration with Coach Nightee (tm) ?  Does your wife
    know about this problem ?
    
    BTW, I have to admit that T is not what I expected when I first met
    him.  He is a young, caucasian, Irish, backslapping kinda guy.  He is
    also a slender kind of fellow.  Nice guy.
    
    John "D Cowboys" R.
15.1220Midwest Micky D' AA for the last 15 yearsCELTIK::R_QUINNMon Apr 13 1992 22:0172
USA Today list the McDonalds All America players by State.  It has been 
in existence for 15 years.
Key: Big Ten
(IL)-Illinois, (IU)-Indiana, (IO)-Iowa, (M)-Michigan. (MS)-Michigan St.
(MN)-Minnesota, (O)- Ohio St, (P)-Purdue (WI)-Wisonsin (N)-Northwestern    

Other Midwest Schools
(ND)- Notre Dame, (D)-Depaul, (MQ)-Marquette

I notated those players who I was aware of that played in the Big 10 and 
other midwestern schools.  There are definitely names I am not familiar with.
Some of these guys may have been mired on the end of schools bench or left
the midwest for some unnamed schools(acc, big east, sec). It is also possible
that some of these players went to smaller schools.  It is amazing that so 
many players did play in the midwest where they attended high school.
Feel free to update the listing.

Illinois
Mark Aquirre(D), Eric Anderson(IU), Nick Anderson(IL), Jamie Brandon, 
Chris Collins, Russell Cross(P), Daryl Cunningham, Bruce Douglas(IL), 
Walter Downing, LaPhonso Ellis(ND), Teddy Grubbs, Lowell Hamiltion(IL),
Phil Henderson, Ed Horton(IO), Juwan Howard(M),  Richard Keene, 
Tom Kleinschmidt, Marcus Liberty(IL), Roger McClendon, Raymond McCoy(D),
Howard Nathan, Michael Payne(IO), Glen Rivers(MQ), Daryl Thomas, 
Deon Thomas(IL), Isiah Thomas(IU), Raymond Thompson, Chuck Verderber, 
and Efrem Winters(IL).

**Illini got a fair share of these players.  Iowa and Duke get a couple.
  Outside of NY and CAL this looks to be the largest concentration.

Indiana
Damon Bailey(IU), Tom Baker, Ken Barlow(ND), James Blackmon, Delray Brooks(IU), 
Jay Edwards(IU), John Flowers(IU), Greg Graham(IU), Pat Graham(IU),
Roger Harden, Jerome Harden, Alan Henderson(IU), Kip Jones(P), Shawn Kemp,
Troy Lewis(P), Charles Macon, James Master, Eric Montross, Glen Robinson(P),
Ray Tolbert(IU), and Landon Turner(IU).

**Bob Knight may not get national recruits but he does a heck of a job in the
  midwest in particular Indiana and Illinois.  Purdue and ND get a few.

Iowa
Al Lorenzen(IO)

Michigan
Tim Andree, Derrick Coleman, Earvin Johnson(MS), Antoine Joubert(M), Mark Macon,
Roy Marble(IO), Tim McCormick(M), Terry Mills(M), Kenyon Murray,
    Anthony Pendelton, Jalen Rose(M), Kevin Smith(MS), Barry Spencer, 
    Matt Steigenga(MS), Eric Turner(M), Sam Vincent(MS), and Chris Webber(M).

**Michigan and Michigan State got a few but quite a few got away.

Minnesota
Jim Peterson(MN)

Ohio
Dwight Anderson, Rick Calloway(IU), Gary Grant(M), Jimmy Jackson(O), 
Clark Kellogg(O), Jerome Lane, Treg Lee(O), Martin Nessley, John Paxson(ND),
and Greg Simpson. 

Wisconsin
Joe Wolfe
    
****************************************************************************
For futures

Pennsylvania
Gene Banks, Barry Bekkedam, Sam Bowie, Dallas Comegys(D), Reggie Jackson, 
Jeff Lebo, Donyell Marshall, Bill McCaffrey, Alonzo McFarlan, Billy Owens,
Horace Owens, Dave Popson, Jerome Richardson, Mark Stevenson(ND), and 
Clarence Tillman.


15.1221Finally, proof! No plate-stacking butt!!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Apr 13 1992 23:241
    
15.1222FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Apr 13 1992 23:428
    Phil Henderson - Duke, Teddy Grubbs - DePaul, Daryl Thomas - Indiana,
    Eric Montross - UNC, Derrick Coleman - Syracuse, Mark Macon - Temple,
    Gene Banks - Duke, Sam Bowie - Kentucky, Jeff Lebo - UNC, Donyell
    Marshall - Connecticut, Bill McCaffery - Duke, Billy Owens - Syracuse,
    Horace Owens - Rhode Island, Dave Popson - UNC and Jerome "Pooh"
    Richardson - UCLA.
    
    John
15.1223ROYALT::ASHEThought I lobster, but now I flounder...Tue Apr 14 1992 14:061
    Shawn kemp - Kentucky
15.1224CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri May 08 1992 12:4510
	Pat Graham, Indiana junior who sat out last season after breaking
his foot in a pre-season practice, has broken the foot again.  At this time
they claim to be optimistic that he can be fully recovered by next season.

	Anyone know how likely, or unlikely, it is that he can come back from 
this and be effective?  It's always seemed to me that recovering fully from a
second break is pretty rare.

tom
15.1225DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Fri May 08 1992 21:404
    Tom, sounds like he has the same disease Sam Bowie had at UK.  That's
    too bad.  Sounds as though this could be one of those chronic injuries.
    
    WILDCAT
15.1226Multiple breaks tend to lead to chronic problemsCELTIK::R_QUINNMon May 11 1992 23:144
    
    A similar deal took Andrew Toney of the '76ers out of the game.
    
    Roy L.
15.1227UPI: Purdue wrestling coach quit because of low payFORTSC::MOKThu May 28 1992 20:5338
    This has nothing to do with basketball really, but a Big Ten school's
    athletic program nonetheless.
    
    
Subject: Purdue mat coach quits because of low pay
Date: Thu, 28 May 92 6:40:00 PDT
 
	WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. (UPI) -- Purdue head wrestling coach Mitch Hull
quit with an open letter complaining that his pay was the lowest in the
Big Ten.
	Hull, 35, said his pay of $25,500 was simply too low to support a
wife and three children. After being Boilermakers head coach for the
past four seasons, he took an administrative position with USA Wrestling
in Colorado Springs, Colo., at nearly double his Purdue salary, he said.
	The $25,500 is for a 10-month contract. Purdue pro-rates pay for a
year and lists Hull at $30,970 per year.
	Hull said the day he was promoted from assistant coach his mood went
swiftly from joy to gloom when he learned his 10 percent raise would
leave him struggling financially.
	``I became phyusically ill by the thought of having to tell my wife
that the sacrifice I put my family through toi become head wrestling
coach at Purdue was going to bring us $22,000 a year,'' he said. 
``Imagine, being the head coach at a Big Ten university and qualifying
for food stamps.''
	``I'm sorry and disappointed that Mitch resigned and did it that way,
'' said retiring Athletic Director George King Wednesday, ``but I think
I understand where he's coming from.
	``Hopefully some good can come from this,'' King said. ``It is hard
to dispute facts, and facts are that we have a number of our people who
really are underpaid,'' he said. He said one of the reasons he is
retiring June 30 is ``to try to give the departmment a chance to get
into different types of funding.''
	He said the only somewhat well-paid person in the department is
basketball coach Gene Keady, while Jim Colletto is ninth or 10th among
the conference football coaches in pay and King probably ranks around
ninth or 10th among the athletic directors.
	Keady is paid $137,700 and Colletto $110,000, while King's salary is
$107,000, Purdue sources said.
15.1228ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYThe Opposite Of Macho Is BimboThu Jun 04 1992 14:206
    Any word on how Glenn Robinson did academically as a frosh?  This
    guy is maybge better than Chris Webber and is the reason Gene 
    Keady, who loves to interview, wouldn't even consider several job
    opportunities this spring.
    
    MrT
15.1229CSOA1::SIMPSON_TIn search of mythical kingsFri Jun 05 1992 13:117
	No details, but my understanding is that he'll be eligible next year.

	Robinson, who's *probably* as good as Chris Webber, and Kenny Williams
will give Purdue a monster frontcourt for other Big 10(1) schools to deal with.

tom
15.1230Recruiting InfoSTRATA::CAPPELMon Jun 08 1992 19:5043
Looks like IU might have some NUKEWIDEBODYSTUDS in 93-94.
    
Article: 15281
From: foerster@zman.rtp.dg.com (Mike Von Foerster)
Newsgroups: rec.sport.basketball.college
Subject: Bob Gibbons says
Date: 7 Jun 92 12:14:41 GMT
Sender: foerster@zman (Mike Von Foerster)
Organization: Data General Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC
 
 
I just got my Bob Gibbons news letter for May and the keywords for
1993 recruiting are Indiana and Duke.
 
Duke has received committments from Jeff Capel 6'4" PG from Hope Mills, NC
and Greg Newton 6'10" PF from Niagara Falls, Ontario Canada.
 
Indiana has received committments from Robbie Eggars 6'10" C/PF, Cuyahoga 
Falls, OH and from Richard Mandeville, 7'0" C from LaCanada, CA. Word is
Joe Hillman helped a lot with this one. Bob Gibbons projects an Indiana
front line of Eggars, Mandeville and Henderson. Oooohhhh My, Hoosier fans
will be adjusting their TV's to be able to get these big guys on the 
screen.
 
Gentry Sparks, 6'8" PF is going to FSU.
Derek Anderson 6'4" 2G is officially signed with OSU.
Sydney Coles 6'4" PG signed with Memphis State (younger brother of Bimbo Coles)
Brandon Titus 6'4" 2G signed with LSU. LSU recruited no one over 6'6". All 5
                      recruits are perimeter players
Craig Tyson, 6'4" 2G from Southern Idaho JC signed with Arkansas. This guy can
                      let them fly from downtown.
 
There's a lot of good stuff in his news letter
 
 
-- 
 
Michael von Foerster           Internet: foerster@dg-rtp.dg.com
DG/UX Core Development         UUCP:     {world}!mcnc!rti!dg-rtp!foerster
Data General Corporation
62 T.W. Alexander Drive
RTP, NC. 27709                 Phone:    919-248-6327
    
15.1231Big10: Nation's tip-top hoops circuit next yearANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYNavigating from the poop deckTue Jun 09 1992 16:3516
    I've gotten by for 8 years with my 13 inch Sony, but with this
    big wide Class a '93 coming in I have a year and a half to save
    up for a 32 inch job.
    
    But even for next year we got the Ohio PoY coming in with the
    signing of 6-4 Maurice Sims and the 6-4 Steve Hart, who apparently
    cain jump higher than Keith Smart!
    
    It's looks like Bob has weathered the malicious fiction put out
    by that fat NorthEastCorridorCircleJerk sudden millionaire creep
    and the program is BACK ON TRACK.  
    
    Maybe these good things are happening cuz a the coaching lesson 
    Bob dog-walked his acolyte through in the Dome last March...
    
    Big10 Bigot Tom
15.1232better win with themHBAHBA::HAASWTOE RadioTue Jun 09 1992 16:417
Let's see: "best coach", "best program", "best recruiting".

Seems a whole lot like that program in Chapel Hill. Now all we need is
Bobby to not win it with this group and then we can apply the much
coveted El Deano Choko award.

TTom
15.1233FRETZ::HEISERI *AM* MikeTue Jun 09 1992 17:125
>    I've gotten by for 8 years with my 13 inch Sony, but with this
>    big wide Class a '93 coming in I have a year and a half to save
>    up for a 32 inch job.
    
    No wonder they call you Po' Mr.T!  You need a few more inches!
15.1234and furthermore.......7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeTue Jun 09 1992 17:139
    
    I still don't agree with the freshman eligibility rule.
    
    I wanna see it abolished!!!!!!!
    
    imo, of course,
    
    Kev
    
15.123513 inches is plenty big buddyANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYGunsDon'tKillPeopleBulletsDoTue Jun 09 1992 17:451
    
15.1236I wouldn't cut any off for anyoneFRETZ::HEISERelectric warrior/acoustic saintTue Jun 09 1992 18:261
    
15.12384:09 PMCTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHQuayle: Murphy caused the LA riot!!Tue Jun 09 1992 19:100
15.1239btw - what was the purchase price?7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeTue Jun 09 1992 19:2816
    
    Hail I don't care what base or scale MrT uses to measure length.  All
    I want is him to cert and cert and cert to the tune of ~180% of goal.
    
    Naturally, this is to set an example of overachieving  ;^)
    
    Sell "T", sell.....
    
    bring in the money
    
    pleeze?
    
    I remain,
    wanting the stock to go up!
    Kev
    
15.1240lucky for Mr.T ;-)FRETZ::HEISERelectric warrior/acoustic saintTue Jun 09 1992 20:391
    Po' Mrs.T has no sense of distance
15.1241ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYGunsDon'tKillPeopleBulletsDoMon Jun 15 1992 19:414
    I aim a visionary and visonaries always have a superb sense
    a distance, thank you.
    
    MrT
15.1242Bob > DeanANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jun 17 1992 12:301
    Bob > Dean
15.12437389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Jun 17 1992 13:064
    
    LOUIEEE > Bob > Dean < Bumheim
    
    nuff said!
15.1244Pop quiz on the Basketball Hall a FameANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jun 17 1992 16:0611
    The admission of Louie Carnagesickum into the hoops HoF:
    
    a - Cheapened the HoF
    
    b - Made a laughinstock of the HoF's admissions standards
    
    c - Was a ringing endorsement of mediocrity
    
    d - Amounted to a victory of maudlin personality over performance
    
    e - All a the above
15.1245SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Jun 17 1992 16:172
       I think it was the sweaters that did it!
                                       Denny
15.1246jest jealous cause Bob has fewer fans than LOUIEEE!7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Jun 17 1992 16:3514
    
    MrT(terminal),
    Of course that last reply was your opinion and as we all know, 
    opions(tm) are like a**holes.
    
    IMO, I'm gonna consider your opion(tm) and a**hole to be one and the
    same!
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    greatful you clarified and removed all doubt about CP II being a hoax!
    Kev
    
15.1247stains?ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jun 17 1992 16:417
    >I think it was the sweaters that did it!
    
    Denny, more likely it was the fack that Carnagesickum never saw
    a reporter's shoe that he wouldn't lick.  Sorta makes you wonder
    where all those big ugly splotchy spots on his sweaters came from...
    
    MrT
15.1248twisted man, really but I unnerstand7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Jun 17 1992 16:5622
    
    I'd like to correct one small error in your (erroneous) opinion
    and obvious biass Mr. Platestacker,
    
    You (obviously from contact with that thug Rev. Knight) are
    misinterpreting a well bred gentlemanly behavior of LOUIEE with
    a weakness, since Rev. Knight has no class and believes that anything
    other than uncivilized behavior must be considered "shoe licking wimp
    behavior"!!!!!
    
    I don't know about your family but *I'm* raising my kid to be well bred
    and to exhibit superior human qualities by avoiding violence!
    
    Therefore to correct someting:
    
    LOUIEEEE > Rev. Knight because a superior man abhors violence while
    a_inferior man thrives on it!
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
15.1249bid difference, thatANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightWed Jun 17 1992 19:386
    I seem to remember that Mr. Carnagesicum, whom you extoll as a
    avoider a violence, has had problems with basketball riots involving
    his team.  On a more positive note, Bob has never had a single player
    involved in a single fight.  Ever.
    
    MrT
15.1250hth7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeWed Jun 17 1992 19:5612
    
    Brain cells are shorted out again MrT(temporary),
    
    They were simply defending themselves (i.e. blocking & stopping
    punches) by those thugs in Gougetown.
    
    No tanks necessary, jest send money!
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
15.1251Carnagesickum does NOT belong in the HoFANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Jun 18 1992 13:556
    However you spin control it, Bob's criticised for violence but in
    25 years never had a player in a fight; Carnagesickum is praised as
    a beacon of peace and yet has more violent blotches on his record
    than on those awful sweaters he covers is pot gut with.
    
    MrT
15.1252Can you say arrest warrant?7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Jun 18 1992 15:2211
    
    
    LOUIEEE never threw a chair, never punched out a policeman
    or pulled his team off the floor in a fit of childlike rage!
    
    your serve......
    
    I remain,
    havin fun with this!
    Kev
    
15.1253Bob Knight: Integrity Personified...ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightThu Jun 18 1992 17:4112
    Bob never pulled his team off of any floor.  He was ordered to
    remove his team by the haid official three minutes after the
    Commies had already gone to the locker room.  USA Basketball later
    issued a letter a apology to Bob for the mix-up that lead to them
    calling the game a forfeit and forcing him to pull his team from
    the floor.
    
    And yes, Carnagesickum never punched anybody.  He relied on his
    street punk "scholar" athletes to do the assault and battery
    piece.
    
    MrT 
15.1254ya forgot to mention the chair T-emporary !7389::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeThu Jun 18 1992 18:441
    
15.1255big frikkin' dealANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYMrT: SPORTS' Master BaiterThu Jun 18 1992 21:411
    
15.1256you sure look good in that "G" string BobANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYFace.... The Final FrontierFri Jun 19 1992 11:1213
    Bob, you make my heart throb.  
    
    Bobby, thank you for the Excellence, the Integrity, the sublime
    motion offense, all those Big10 Titles, the humiliation of stupid
    big-mouthed "coaches"... but Bob, thank you most a all for all those
    National Championships.
    
    I cain't protect you in here anymore Bob.  This sad task must now
    be left to Cap and Tom Simpson.  But wherever I go, Bobby, I will
    stand foursquare to preach the gospel and protect your legacy a
    Greatness.
    
    Big10 Bigot Tom
15.1257Not like trying to protect Dean, or KYCSOA1::SIMPSON_TBarth,Coover,Robbins,MrTFri Jun 19 1992 12:305
	Bob'll be fine, T.  As you've said on more than one occasion, standing
up for integrity and greatness is an honor, not a chore.

tom
15.1258CAMONE::WAYDeath before DishonorFri Jun 19 1992 12:369
Good point Tom.

Many are called, few are chosen.  Bob was not only chosen, but he has
excelled.

MrT should know that his legacy in here will not be forgotten.....


'Saw
15.1259DYPSS1::ROPERBRoper DTN-433-4336Fri Jun 19 1992 14:277
    Yeah right!  I'd love my kids too look up to Bob Knight as a role
    model.  How to treat others with respect, etc.  How to sacrifice your
    own ego for others, etc.
    
    NOT!!!
    
    WILDCAT
15.1260Some things never changeWWSSB::COOK_TThey don't call them serial wounders, do they?!Fri Jun 19 1992 14:549
Re: last few

I love this...  MorT going down in a blaze of POPB!!

Losing control over the one thing he has always rallied against.



Conan
15.1261ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYFace.... The Final FrontierFri Jun 19 1992 16:4110
    A question I always wanted to axe, but didn't: Is BobKnight God?
    Or maybe just a angel?
    
    Bobby if I ever meet you again I aim gonna suck your toes slamming
    my face into your feet woodpecker-style under my lips are all puffy
    and bruised!
    
    What a wonderful person joe are Bobby...
    
    Big10 Bigot Tom
15.1262Goodbye to ol' #15ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Jun 19 1992 16:411
    
15.1263-2,you just gave Bob diarrhea of the cloven hoofCTHQ1::LEARYSix, two, and even.Fri Jun 19 1992 16:571
    
15.1264WWSSB::COOK_TThey don't call them serial wounders, do they?!Fri Jun 19 1992 17:0110
re: .1261

I'm dying...  HAHAHAHAHA(tm)!

All I can picture is ugly girl spoof on "In Living Color"

"I'll rock your world"...


Conan
15.1265Knight on radioJURAN::MCKAYMon Jun 22 1992 16:536
    I read in Sunday's paper how one of the local am stations is having 
    a one hour (fishing?) panel made up of Ted Williams, someone else 
    and The General.  I think it's happening on Tuesday of this week.
    If anyone is interested send me mail and I'll look up the specifics.
    
    Jimbo
15.1266SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Jun 22 1992 17:013
       I think it's Dale Arnold on WEEI at noon tomorrow. The 'other guy'
    is Curt Gowdy.
                                     Denny
15.1267CAMONE::WAYDeath before DishonorMon Jun 22 1992 17:044
I'd call that a Blue Ribbon Panel then.


'Saw
15.1268Wait till next year...or the year afterCSOA1::SIMPSON_TBarth,Coover,Robbins,MrTThu Nov 12 1992 00:0118
	The Hoosiers signed 5 recruits today:

	Richard Mandeville, 7-0, La Canada, CA

	Robbie Eggers, 6-10, Cuyahoga Falls, OH

	Sherron Wilkerson, 6-3, Jeffersonville, IN

	Rob Foster, 6-3, Los Angeles, CA

	Steve Hart, 6-3, Terre Haute, IN

	
	Hart initially signed with the Hoosiers last year, then ended up in a
prep school after failing to make the minimum score on his SATs.

tom
15.1269CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Thu Nov 12 1992 11:455
Oh MAIN!  Ya mean da Hoosiers and Sir Bob Knight finally got some nuke-clear
wide-body studs!  Oh Main, my thighs are a shuddering....and MrT is all
thrust up and knobby ;-)

JD
15.1270Hate to say it but..ROCK::MURPHYThu Nov 12 1992 18:379
I don't think Indiana even has to wait until next year.  They should win
the Big 10 even though it is tough and the Michigan players are off the hook.
I just hope the Lou Doo can get the Illini back to 20 wins.  From the I would
have to see it to believe it department, at Illinois Midnight madness, they
turned the lights down, put a coffin at midcourt, shined down a spotlight,
and the players lifted the lid.  Out popped Lou dressed as a vampire.  Bet
he looked like Grampa Munster....

Murph
15.1271We're Number 1.......or notCSOA1::SIMPSON_TBarth,Coover,Robbins,MrTTue Dec 01 1992 21:3110
	Pat Graham *appears* to be out for the year after suffering yet
	another broken foot in Indiana's win over Fla. State in the pre-
	season NIT.  There's still a slight chance that he could be ready
	by tournament time, but given his history it's unlikely they'll rush
	him back.  Always a shame to see a guy lose a year of eligibility.

	Next up:  #1 (in one poll) IU vs. #2 (in some) Kansas

tom
15.1272dominating last nightCNTROL::CHILDSKaroke Hockey catch the fever!Wed Dec 02 1992 12:257
Especially when you been waiting to see this guy break through. Tough break
for Pat and IU. 

Wonder if Chris Webber has NBA #1 draft pick 1993 on his mind?? 

mike
15.1273RoyWilliams (i.e. DeanSmith) > Bob.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Dec 07 1992 14:141
    
15.1274Whar's MrT when ya need him? Calling Cap!!CTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Mon Dec 07 1992 14:181
    
15.1275Bigot10 clearly 2nd tier. (ACC alone on 1st.)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Dec 07 1992 17:444
    Awful quiet in this_here "Big Ten" conference today.  Heh heh!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1276ROYALT::ASHEWhat people do... for money...Mon Dec 07 1992 17:483
    Michigan lost to Duke.  Not a surprise to me the way they struggled
    against Rice.  Didn't see the KU-IU game... so?
    
15.1277But the Big Ten is overated....WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsMon Dec 07 1992 18:207
    
    
            ACC-Chris Duke is alone on the top tier not the ACC. (See NC,
    NC State....etc.
    
    Chappy
    
15.1278CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Mon Dec 07 1992 18:305
Chriss.

After Duke, the Acc is toast.  Didn't IU beat FSU?  

JD
15.1279Overrated --- maybeCSOA1::SIMPSON_TBarth,Coover,Robbins,MrTMon Dec 07 1992 22:0716

	IU did beat FSU...alsoUCLA and Seton Hall on their way to the
pre-season NIT title.

	The Kansas games was disappointing only in the free-throw shooting.
Other than that, both teams played pretty well.  Indiana once again (must be
five times already this year) blew a substantial lead, but that has more to do
with playing a lot of people than anything else.  That problem should be worked
out by the time the Big 10(1) season rolls around.  Good to see Cheaney 
continuing his excellent play, and Bailey having his first good game of the 
year.  They'll need him if they want to be a contender.

	Next up:  Tuesday at Notre Dame

tom
15.1280Triple ouch tonightCTHQ::LEARYWhy George why? Because it's there!Tue Dec 08 1992 12:2612
    -1,
    Well tom,
    You can send your cheerleaders up to South Bend to beat ND tonight.
    Gradiation hit 'em bigtime with LaPhonso, Bennett and Sweet gone
    and the pickin's mighty slim ( thanks Digger for sitting on yo' fat
    arse for the last couple). MacLeod's gonna have a rough year.
    You know things ain't gonna be right when their captain 
    is 'Brooks Boyer'. Sounds like he should be playing polo pony.
    
    MikeL
    Who don't want to look up the score in the AM
    
15.1281WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MPlease George don't sign BoggsTue Dec 08 1992 12:2710
    
    
            I can see Michigan and Indiana being rated this high. But Iowa
    in the Top Ten. Please! I saw them play the week before last and they
    weren't that impressive. Plus one of the polls has 7 Big ten Schools in
    the top 30. That is overating a conference.
    
    
    
    Chappy
15.1282Overrated?ROCK::MURPHYMon Dec 14 1992 14:088
re -.1

We'll see - methinks the Illini have righted themselves after the early one
point setback.  The Missouri and Texas games will tell the tale.  I would
agree that Iowa is a little high, but still a top 20 team.  OSU plays on the tube
this weekend so we'll get to see how good Funderburke is carrying the team.

Murph
15.1283Ohio State Buckeyes @ Lawrence FunderburkeRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 23 1992 13:0522
    > we'll get to see how good Funderburke is carrying the team.
    
    OSU has two (2) consecutive L's (West Virginia on the road; North
    Carolina at home) but Lawrence Funderburke is extraordinarily talented. 
    His arm length reminds me of Pervis Ellison or Sam Perkins -
    incredible.  The Bucks will be okay - they've got alot of young,
    talented players.  Ayers just needs to decide who he wants to play
    and stick with 'em.  
    
    Watch out for this club come year-end.  (BTW, Funderburp told Dick
    Vitale during the shoot-around that UNC was his 2nd choice to Indiana
    outof high school.  I knew we were in the hunt for him.  Me_thinks if
    he'd gone to Carolina the results would've been the same for him - i.e.
    he'd simply have a different school that he could've said he was FROM. 
    I know I critized Bob for how he handled him, but this kid is mouthy. 
    Never shuts up.  Dean doesn't go for that kindof thing any more than
    Bob does.  Strikes me as a troublemaker with a giant chip on his
    shoulder.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
15.1284deja vuDDIF::MCEVOYWed Dec 30 1992 12:0710
    Big win for the wolves last night. Did anyone see the game? I'm courious
    to hear how the game went, was NC ahead most of the way? How many did
    Webber get, etc.
    
    I saw the highlight of the last second shot by Jalen for the win, it 
    looked a lot like Higgins put-back to beat Illinois in the '89 Final Four. 
    Now, hopefully tonight, the Kansas game will finish like the Seton Hall 
    game did in 89 as well!
    
    -dennis
15.1285More on UNC vs. MichiganRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Dec 30 1992 15:569
    Dennis, take a look at 17.4532.  The definitive UNC vs. Michigan note.
    Webber had a nice game - 21 points I think and quite a few rebounds. 
    (Approximately 11.)  Montross and Lynch played him tough though.  Eric
    changed a few of Webber's shots, and that ain't easy to do.  Course
    Webber slapped back more than a few would-be UNC baskets.  Lynch had at
    least 16 rebounds, and Montross had around 11.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1286go blueRAB::MCEVOYThu Dec 31 1992 11:5813
    Nice win for Michigan over Kansas last night, sounded a little
    easier than the NC game. This should put UM back in the top 5
    before the Big 10 opens. I think this tourney shows that Michigan
    will be tough come tournament time if they come in on the right
    note. For Michigan, I think that means they need to finish 2nd
    or 3rd in the Big Ten, drop down in the national rankings so that
    they have something to prove in the NCAA's. I think a number one
    seed is the worst thing that could happen to them. If they come
    into the tourney as a 2 or 3 seed, they will be tough. I hope Duke
    goes undefeated in the regular season, stays #1, and saves their
    loss for the final four.
    
    -dennis
15.1287good winHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortThu Dec 31 1992 13:3214
It's a little early to compare Kansas with No Carolina based solely on
how the teams lost to Michigan. Michigan played its best game of the
season lasted night and Kansas simply doesn't match up. The more the
Kansas guards tried to pressure the Rose, the more the middle opened up
for Webber. 

This was a much better effort than the No Carolina game. One thing should
be added to Knorr's analysis. While it might have been a great game, the
No Carolina game was not well played by either team.

And all this only emphasizes how good Duke is to be able to beat
Michigan.

TTom
15.1288SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Thu Dec 31 1992 13:5512
    
    
    	No small feat is the fact that Michigan beat 3 top 20 teams over
    a 72 hour period!  3 games in less than 3 days and all in the top 20
    and all were wins.  That's a pretty impressive feat.
    
    	Give Michigan another shot at Duke in late February or March and
    the results might be different especially if played at Michigan.
    
    
    bill..g.
    
15.1289possible matchupsHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortThu Dec 31 1992 14:0215
3 wins in 3 days are impressive. You really can't count Nebraska as a Top
20 team. I know that's what they were rated going into this tourney but
losing to SW Louisiana ain't what it takes to stay with the elite.

Musing on a Michigan-Duke rematch shows how important the seedings are
for the NCAA tourney. In the Rainbow Classic tourney, Kansas, No Carolina
and Michigan could all be final 4 teams. Throw Duke into this mix and
probably Kentucky and it's clear that not all will get there even if you
don't consider upsets and choke jobs. The semis could be final 4 type
matchups.

In any case, if'n Duke and Michigan get to play each other again, it'll
be on a neutral court and not in the midst of the crazies in Durham.

TTom
15.1290oh yeah: don't forget IndianaHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortThu Dec 31 1992 14:030
15.1291More ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Dec 31 1992 14:0917
    TTom's right - the Michigan vs. UNC game was not terribly well played. 
    Carolina shot the ball extremely poorly and had way too many unforced
    turnovers, especially in the first half.  Michigan lost won of its
    SuperSoph's early and I was less than impressed with their
    replacements.
    
    Didn't see the Kansas vs. Michigan game last night. (Although I must
    admit to being a tad impressed with TTom's love for the game - a 1AM
    start time is nothing to sneeze at!)  Michigan had to be feeling
    confident after beating Nebraska and Carolina.  Meanwhile Kansas had
    walked thru an incredibly easy draw.  Whoever did the pairings for this
    Tourney must've been drunk at the time.  Michigan, UNC, Nebraska, and
    SW Lousiana all in one bracket, meanwhile Kansas was paired with
    absolutely nobody.  Weird.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1292Happy New Year to allHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortThu Dec 31 1992 14:228
Chris, I wish I could claim that I stayed up for the game. In fact, it
just turned out that I was just coming home from getting ready for this
latest holiday season.

All in all, the Rainbow tourney was a classic, bracket pairings
notwithstanding.

TTom
15.1293MIMS::ROLLINS_RThu Dec 31 1992 16:382
	I believe the brackets were set up to assure that host-school
	Hawaii did not end up playing in the 7th vs 8th place game.
15.1294ROYALT::ASHEMon Jan 04 1993 20:201
    FWIW, Andy Van Slyke thinks Iowa will win it all...
15.1295verdict is outHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortMon Jan 04 1993 21:1711
I saw that.

Iowa has a lot to get through to get there. Let's see how they do after a
couple of games against Indiana and Michigan. The Acie Earl-Mr. Robinson
matchups could be worth wathcing as well.

From my view there's a handful of top teams right now: Duke, Kansas,
Indiana, Michigan, Kentucky and possibly No Carolina. Iowa and Purdue are
probably in the nexted tier with Seton Hall.

TTom
15.1296DUGROS::ROSSBaby Makes FiveTue Jan 05 1993 18:206
Michigan plays at Purdue on Thursday night.   A Purdue win would probably
move them onto the edge of Top 5 territory {which is about 15 places too
high, in my view... they've squeeked by in a number of games}. 

It'll be interesting to see how the Robinson/Webber matchup turns out.
Too bad the chances are slim-to-none that we'll see many more of them.
15.1297DeanSmith sporting .658 win pct. over Big10.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Jan 06 1993 20:0919
    Dean Smith's record vs. Big10:
    
    Michigan		2	2
    Indiana		4	5
    Ohio St.		5	1
    Penn St.		3	0
    Iowa		0	2
    Northwestern	2	0
    Purdue		5	2
    Michigan St.	2	0
    Minnesota		0	1
    Illinois		2	0
    
    TOTAL:	       25      13
    
    
    HTH,
    
    - ACC Chris
15.1298ANGLIN::WIERSBECKRemember Twins/Braves in '91?Wed Jan 06 1993 20:275
    THAT'S why they never play the Gophs!  He loses and then refuses to
    reschedule.
    
    
    Spud
15.1299all games are not equalHBAHBA::HAASA Log of EffortWed Jan 06 1993 21:1812
>    Indiana		4	5

Wasn't one of the these a late season peak for Isiah and the rest of the
Hoosiers in 81?

>    Iowa		0	2

I remember one of these when Gamble (I recollect?) was given the ball to
shoot free throws when someone else had been fouled. At Chapel Hill, no
less!

TTom