[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::sports_91

Title:CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid
Notice:This file has been archived. New notes to CAM3::SPORTS.
Moderator:CAM3::WAY
Created:Fri Dec 21 1990
Last Modified:Mon Nov 01 1993
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:290
Total number of notes:84103

3.0. "The National League (Baseball)" by CAM::WAY (Futue te ipsum et caballum tuum) Fri Dec 21 1990 15:28

This topic is for discussing the National League.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3.1Hopefully ESPN will still have a bunchAGNT99::MACNEALPapa MacMon Jan 07 1991 16:522
    The new home for TV baseball, CBS, will be televising a whopping 16
    regular season games in 1991.
3.2CAM::WAYLet's Dance to the Masochism TangoMon Jan 07 1991 17:1314
3.3CHIEFF::MACNEALPapa MacMon Jan 07 1991 17:585
3.4CAM::WAYLet's Dance to the Masochism TangoMon Jan 07 1991 18:439
3.5Future star or someone on his way out?SHALOT::MEDVIDSpiderman is having me for dinnerFri Jan 11 1991 16:576
    Today's paper says that the Pirates agreed to a one-year, $450,000
    contract with free-agent infielder Curtis Wilkerson.
    
    Um...who's that?
    
    	--dan'l
3.6Utility player...been around...Texas recently...parade in...HOTSHT::SCHNEIDERThe elbow is part of the ballFri Jan 11 1991 17:011
    
3.7STAR::YANKOWSKASDo the Bartman!Fri Jan 11 1991 17:125
    Wilkerson also spent a couple years with the Cubs...generic mediocre
    utility type player...
    
    
    py
3.8OK all you Friday punditsCNTROL::MACNEALPapa MacFri Jan 11 1991 19:495
    OK Y'all,
    
    Get thee to a punnery.  
    
    Go directly to note 69.  Do not pass Go.  Do not collect $200.
3.9A new patch for the AIDS quilt ... :-(EARRTH::BROOKSPsssst .... Elvis is dead.Thu Jan 17 1991 17:0725
    I'm really suprised that this didn't get a play in this note.
    
    Former San Diego Padre 2B/CF Alan Wiggins, died earlier this week of
    AIDS-related complications. He was 32.
    
    In 1984, Wiggins was the catalyst behind the Padres drive to the
    National League pennant, as he stole 70 bases and scored 106 runs.
    However, the next season, drug problems caused him to be suspended,
    then dropped from the Pads. (San Diego never recovered from his loss in
    the lineup.) He was picked up by Baltimore, but he had a relaspe and
    ended up out of baseball.
    
    By the time of his death, he had melted down to 75 lbs. He is survived
    by a wife and three children. 
    
    What is really sad is that for all of the friends that he was supposed
    to have had in the game, only Steve Garvey represented the Pads at his
    funeral (a man with whom Wiggins supposedly didn't get along with). Lee
    Lacy represented the O's.
    
    I assume that his contraction of AIDS was realted to his drug use.
    
    RIP alan.
    
    Doc
3.10too badPNO::HEISERnews: 71 shopping days til no PNOThu Jan 17 1991 17:124
    Yeah I had heard this too!  He had a great post season performance in
    '84!
    
    Mike
3.11REFINE::ASHEAll we are saying...Thu Jan 17 1991 20:203
    Too bad it wasn't good enough... (ha ha)
    
    I heard rumors it was AIDS related, but didn't hear confirmation.
3.12EARRTH::BROOKSPsssst .... Elvis is dead.Fri Jan 18 1991 02:543
    Yeah, when I read that he died of pnemonia, and some other aliments, I
    immeaditely thought AIDS, esp. in light of his past drug use. I'm sorry
    that I was right ... :-(
3.13Sigh yung lad makes good!QUASER::JOHNSTONLegitimateSportingPurpose?E.S.A.D.!Fri Feb 15 1991 14:148
Doug Drabek went to arbitration.
result= $3,335,000.00
per year

maybe I'll tell my kid he can quit school and just throw a baseball six
hours a day.

Mike JN
3.14How do you go to arbitration at DEC? ;^)CAM::WAYThe Axe-masterFri Feb 15 1991 14:206
Hey, for that kind of $$$$, maybe I'll go to arbitration.

I can't pitch worth a darn, but he, maybe I can pick up over 100K,
which is far more than I make here...

'Saw
3.15COOKIE::WAHLFri Feb 15 1991 19:242
    Here, if you go to arbitration, they encourage you to become a free
    agent ...
3.16VAXWRK::NEEDLEMoney talks. Mine says "Good-Bye!"Fri Feb 15 1991 20:3424
The following players are the 29 remaining free agents:

AMERICAN LEAGUE 
--------------- 
Baltimore Orioles (2) -- Ron Kittle, Joe Price
Boston Red Sox (1) -- Danny Heep
California Angels (2) -- Brian Downing, Greg Minton
Cleveland Indians (3) -- Tom Brookens, Candy Maldonado, Ken Phelps
Detroit Tigers (3) -- Darnell Coles, Larry Sheets, Gary Ward
Kansas City Royals (2) -- Steve Jeltz, Frank White
Milwaukee Brewers (1) -- Paul Mirabella
Oakland Athletics (2) -- Ron Hassey, Willie Randolph
Toronto Blue Jays (1) -- John Candelaria


NATIONAL LEAGUE
---------------- 
Cincinnati Reds (2) -- Rick Mahler, Ron Oester
Los Angeles Dodgers (1) -- Rick Dempsey
Montreal Expos (1) -- Dave Schmidt
Pittsburgh Pirates (2) -- Doug Bair, Jerry Reuss
St. Louis Cardinals (3) -- Tom Niedenfuer, John Tudor, Denny Walling
San Diego Padres (1) -- Fred Lynn
San Francisco Giants (2) -- Gary Carter, Mark Thurmond.
3.17STAR::YANKOWSKASThe Celtics are for realMon Feb 18 1991 12:1812
    re .16:
    
    Several of the players listed have received invitations to spring
    training as non-roster players: Larry Sheets with the O's, Ron Hassey
    with Montreal, Rick Dempsey with the Brewers, and Gary Carter with the
    Dodgers.  I think Candelaria also got an invite to the Dodgers camp,
    but I'm not positive.  
    
    I'm shocked that Candy Maldonado still remains available...
    
    
    py
3.18CSC32::W_TUTTLEMon Feb 25 1991 17:077
    The Braves signed Dave Justice to a one-year contract. Does anyone know
    for how much? Why didn't the Braves sign him to a multi-year contract?
    Is it because he needs to prove himself this year  or cause he can't 
    be a free agent for 3 years?
    
    Thanks,
    The Thrill
3.19CSC32::W_TUTTLEMon Feb 25 1991 17:174
    Right-hander Dwight Gooden does an about-face, deciding his agent may 
    reopen contract negotiations with the New York Mets.
    
    Will The Thrill
3.20Denver gets their at-bat todayBSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Mar 26 1991 14:308
    NL expansion committee will visit Denver today, the last of their
    visits to prospective expansion cities.  During their visit, they will
    tour the location of a new ballpark and Mile High Stadium, which is
    where an expansion team would play its first 2 seasons while the new
    park is being built.  A decision on the 2 expansion cities could come
    as early as mid-June.
    
    Joe
3.21STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Mar 26 1991 16:337
    re .20:
    
    I can imagine the "altitude effects" ratholes that would take place in
    this conference if Denver got a MLB team...
    
    
    py
3.22RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Mar 26 1991 18:2918
    Take it to the bank...
    
    Buffalo is a shoe in for 1 franchise.
    
    Washington has a toe up on Denver for the second.
    
    As for the Florida entries; can you imagine playing baseball in July in
    Joe Robbie Stadium? 
    
    Orlando is for Mickey and Goofey - not baseball - besides, it's too
    hot.
    
    Tampa-St Pete has the best shot since they have a dome but that is
    precisely WHY I would not like to see a team go there. Baseball is for
    outdoors on real grass.
    
    Rich
    
3.23You think Buffalo will get a franchise ?CAM::MAZURIt ain't the meat, it's the lotion.Tue Mar 26 1991 19:1414
>    Buffalo is a shoe in for 1 franchise.
    
    I'm curious why YOU think so.  I know why Buffalo SHOULD get it, but
    being from Buffalo, I have a strong feeling they won't.  It's just a 
    law of nature.  Buffalo is not a sexy town.  Sure they have a new
    stadium that is absolutely beautiful (I've been at a Buffalo Bison's
    game), they broke minor league records for attendance, they are a 
    sports town in the sense that NYC, Boston and Chicago are, etc...
    BUT NOOOOOO... (ahem, let me stop here)
    
    So why do you think so.
    
    -Paul 
    (Buffalonian in CT)
3.24CAM::WAYProps have great shoulders to lean onTue Mar 26 1991 19:1811
>    -Paul 
>    (Buffalonian in CT)

Let me correct that for you:

	-Paul
	(Baloney-an in CT)

HTH,
'Saw

3.25Florida hot market...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 26 1991 19:207
                                               
    Everything I've read has said that Florida has one franchise locked up,
    with an outside chance of taking both.  The AL has complained that the
    second Florida franchise should be left to them for a later expansion.
    
    glenn
      
3.26BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Mar 26 1991 21:257
    I've heard and would agree that Florida has 1 franchise locked up. 
    Buffalo's biggest problems are that it only has a population of about
    1.2 million in its metropolitan area, plus Toronto and Cleveland are
    both only about 3 hours away.  I would be very suprised if Buffalo got
    one of the teams.
    
    Joe
3.27RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Mar 27 1991 11:1020
    re .23
    
    Paul, I feel Buffalo is a lock because it has demonstrated such a
    strong support for baseball. 
    
    Attendance in Florida in the summer is a risk. Washington has failed on
    two occasions. Seattle has proven to be a disappointment as has
    Atlanta.
    
    Baseball wants to be assured that the cities chosen will support the
    franchise and I believe Buffalo has shown this better than any
    prospective city.
    
    As far as nthe proximity to Cleveland and Tornonto, I don't see this as
    a problem because we're talking National League. As far as 1.2 million
    in the metro area, how many are in the St Louis area? Or Kansas City?
    Both franchises draw quite well.
    
    Rich
    
3.28AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC - AnotherExcellentLossPendingWed Mar 27 1991 11:188
    	Buffalo will support the team Rich, but the potential for cable
    revenue and pay per view revenue is greater in Miami or any other
    Florida city.  The Buffalo could very well support this team with
    sellout crowds, but if the television revenue isn't there the team
    will operae at a financial loss.  The live gate cannot finance a
    team's expenses.
    
    				/Don
3.29Buffalo's chances slim...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 27 1991 11:4923
    
    The Slasher's got it right-- Buffalo is *not* a lock.  They're
    officially still in the hunt, but one of the expansion committee 
    members even went so far as to make the rather damning statement 
    on the official visit the other day of "It'd be nice if you had 
    another million people".
    
    Washington very definitely could support a franchise.  Previous
    evidence that they can't is misleading, given the growth of the area
    and construction of one of the best public transportation systems in
    the country since the last move.  Between Cal Griffith and Bob Short, 
    DC was saddled with two of the most cheap-assed, short-sighted owners 
    in the history of baseball, too.  I'll go on record as saying that 
    the franchise that eventually ends up in DC will be better off 
    financially than either of the previous two that fled for Minnesota 
    and Texas is right now. 
    
    For my own personal, selfish reasons, I'd like to see the two
    franchises end up in Buffalo and Washington.  Realistically, though,
    it's going to be Florida and probably either Denver or Washington.
    
    glenn
    
3.30RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Mar 27 1991 12:2719
    Good point, Don. However, is Buffalo any less attractive than Milwaukee
    or Seattle for TV? Or Montreal, for that matter?
    
    I think a local TV station up there could do pretty well with them.If
    they created a network that included much of northen New York that
    included Syracuse, Utica and Rochester, your talking some huge
    potential there.
    
    As far as DC. If they are planning on playing at RFK, you are correct
    in that it is on a stop for the Metro. But, sad to say, most games at
    home will be night games and that area of DC is STILL not an attractive
    geographic place to be at night. It's a 1/2 hour away from Baltimore
    and, to get there from northern Virginia is a traffic nightmare. But,
    if they could pull in 15K-20K a game, they would do well with local TV
    and radio contracts. I still don't think ole Faye wants to see empty
    seats.
    
    Rich
    
3.31St. Pete and DCSHALOT::MEDVIDwe were never being boringWed Mar 27 1991 12:448
    What I think this committee will find attractive about St. Petersberg
    and DC is that they both have facilities and could start play tomorrow.
    All the other sites involve new stadiums or expansion of an existing
    one. 
    
    Or do they already have an expansion year set?
    
    	--dan'l
3.32BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Wed Mar 27 1991 13:0721
>    What I think this committee will find attractive about St. Petersberg
>    and DC is that they both have facilities and could start play tomorrow.
>    All the other sites involve new stadiums or expansion of an existing
>    one. 
    
    The problem with DC is that they would be sharing a stadium with the
    Redskins, and the NL has said they prefer a baseball-only stadium. 
    This could hurt DC.  I don't think they have any plans to build a new
    baseball stadium in DC.  Denver could also start play tomorrow.  The
    plan right now is they would play 2 years in Mile High, and then move
    into the new stadium.  The stadium has already been approved by voters
    and will be built if Denver is awarded a team.  Mile High would need
    some minor changes to accomodate Major League baseball for a couple
    years, but that is no big deal.
    
>    Or do they already have an expansion year set?
    
    The 2 expansion teams will start playing in the 1993 season.
    
    Joe                  
 
3.33More on BuffaloCAM::MAZURIt ain't the meat, it's the lotion.Wed Mar 27 1991 13:2119
>    All the other sites involve new stadiums or expansion of an existing
>    one. 
    
    The Buffalo Bisons (Pirates AAA team) currently play in a brand new 
    stadium (Pilot's field).  It's ready to go.  Additional seating can be 
    added between seasons (it was designed to do so).  So in Buffalo's case, 
    I don't think that's an issue.
    
    As for Buffalo's population supporting the team enough through TV
    revenue (I agree that the bucks to be made are in TV not at the gate),
    just look at the Bills.  They are keeping some very expensive players
    on their roster and are doing quite well.  They have the support of the
    fans and because they fill Rich stadium all the other (and I mean
    pretty darn near ALL the other) 1.2 million will watch the game on the
    tube. Also, Rochester is only 70 miles from Buffalo and Syracuse is
    only 120 miles.  Currently, these cities plus Buffalo are Yankee
    territory, but if a National League team was brought in it would be
    supported.
    
3.34Who plays in Mile High now?SHALOT::MEDVIDwe were never being boringWed Mar 27 1991 13:237
    That reminds me of something I've been wanting to know for the past few
    years, Joe.  What type of baseball are they using Mile High for now? 
    Minor league?  I ask because at the beginning of every NFL season, Mile
    High is showing a baseball field as well.  That's an awfully big
    stadium for minor league ball.
    
    	--dan'l
3.35STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Mar 27 1991 13:386
    re .34:
    
    The Denver Zephyrs (Brewers' AAA team) currently play in Mile High.
    
    
    py
3.36A little bit of history on Mile HighBSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Wed Mar 27 1991 14:0914
    Mile High Stadium was originally built for baseball and was originally
    named Bears Stadium.  The east stands (the ones you see on TV, across
    from the cameras) weren't there originally, and they just set up
    temporary bleachers for football season.  As the Broncos became more
    popular, the movable east stands, were installed.  The last phase of
    expansion took place just before the '77 season (just in time for the
    Broncos' 1st Super Bowl season) and involved the 3rd deck being added
    around the whole stadium, except for the open end, of course.  So
    that's why a AAA team is playing in such a big stadium: it wasn't
    originally very big and was built for baseball.  Also, they added some
    luxury skyboxes along the top of the west side of the stadium a few
    years ago.
    
    Joe
3.37AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC - AnotherExcellentLossPendingWed Mar 27 1991 15:3016
    	Rich those small market teams you mention are having trouble
    surviving financially and true the Buffalo football team is making
    money, but other than the few stars there are no long term guaranteed
    contracts and with the NFL players union being so weak it'll be
    some time before the salaries will escalate like they have in baseball.
    
    	The way for the league's smaller market teams to survive is
    for the Yankees and the large market teams to share their local
    cable revenues.  It will not happen until the league almost fails,
    but it will have to happen or the Seattles Pittsburghs etc. will
    only serve as minor league franchises to the big markets.  I'm not
    saying this guarantees winning championships for the rich teams,
    but it will guarantee their making money, while the smaller franchises
    fail.
    
    				/Don
3.38Everyone supports a winnerBSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Wed Mar 27 1991 15:466
    Buffalo is drawing great now, but don't forget they just won the AFC
    title and have won 3 straight AFC East titles.  How were they doing
    before Jim Kelly came to town?  If I remember right, they were one of
    the league's poorer-drawing teams at the time.
    
    Joe
3.39Naw!! The Bills always draw pretty goodCAM::MAZURIt ain't the meat, it's the lotion.Wed Mar 27 1991 16:1913
    RE: Buffalo Bills
    
   >If I remember right, they were one of the league's poorer-drawing teams at 
    the time.  
    
    Negatory!  When they were winning 2-4 games per season, granted they
    weren't selling out, but they would draw a pretty good size crowd
    (better than most any other city that has a 2-14 team).  Face it,
    Buffalo is a blue collar town that will look for any good excuse to
    swill beer.  Buffalo is comparable (people-wise) to Cleveland or
    Chicago (just smaller).  Weren't the Browns still packing them in after
    this miserable season?
    
3.40STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Mar 27 1991 16:227
    re the last couple:
    
    Also, the Pirates' AAA team in Buffalo drew over one million fans in
    1988 despite finishing 13(?) games out of first.
    
    
     py
3.41DECWET::METZGEROh No, I've said too much...Wed Mar 27 1991 16:3123
The reasons the mariners don't get any support in Seattle are many.

1) The team has sucked for most of it's existance. They've never had a .500 
    season in 14 years of existance.

2) Owners with financial difficulty. Now the Latest owner Smulyan is supposedly
    in difficulty with his radio empire.

3) They play in a stinking dome. When you have 7 months of crappy weather, 2  
    months of so-so weather punctuated by 3 months of good weather would you
    want to spend any of the time of good weather sitting inside a concrete
    structure watching a B-bal team play? The local minor league clubs that play
    outdoors draw decent crowds.


Luckily the emergence of Griffey Jr. could turn around the fortunes of the 
mariners.....It's all wait and see right now....

BTW - the M's bring in a total of $25 million/year in all local broadcast rights
       to their games. The Yankees have a $100 million cable deal alone.....

Metz
3.42Are economic franchise moves necessarily bad?NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 27 1991 16:3519
                
    It may be complete misperception, but I see both Denver and Buffalo as
    great football towns, regardless of their teams' records.  I don't 
    know if they'd do as well with baseball, though, but Buffalo has 
    proved some level of support in the recent past if not throughout 
    their minor league history.  I'm more skeptical of Denver.
    
    Rather than continuous expansion, maybe it's not a bad idea to
    circulate some of the weaker franchises after a certain period of 
    proven non-performance and non-support from both local ownership 
    and/or the fans.  Again from my personal vantage point and with no 
    offense to anyone from these cities, I'd say Montreal and Seattle 
    are ripe for moves to greener pastures, with teams like Houston and 
    Cleveland trailing close behind.  I'd include Atlanta, too, but 
    those poor people have never really been given a chance, and perhaps
    have suffered enough.
    
    glenn
        
3.43SHALOT::MEDVIDwe were never being boringWed Mar 27 1991 17:049
    I remember several years ago a shot of two lone fans at a Bills' game
    doing their own private, two-man wave.  One would stand up, then sit
    down while the other one stood up, then sat down, while the other...
    One of the funniest "fan things" I've ever seen.
    
    No one else was in sight.  That would indicate that they weren't
    drawing very well.
    
    	--dan'l
3.44AXIS::ROBICHAUDUNC - AnotherExcellentLossPendingWed Mar 27 1991 17:238
    	Metz, you sure about the 25 million figure?  Sounds high.  But
    the point I am making is if Seattle can't afford to pay Griffey
    around 7-9 million (don't laugh) when he becomes eligible for free
    agency down the road they are doomed to this cycle of getting young
    players, developing them, watching them become stars and then losing
    them.  And the league is worse off for it.
    
    				/Don
3.45RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOKenya Roools againWed Mar 27 1991 17:483
    I thought the figure was closer to 3 million for the Mariners.
    
    JD
3.46DECWET::METZGEROh No, I've said too much...Wed Mar 27 1991 18:2719
Last I heard was that the 25 million was from all tv and radio rights for a 
season. The yankess are pulling in 100 Mill in cable alone (like sportschannel),
not counting radio, local broadcast (ala 38 for the Sox) and other cable (PIX).

However I could be mistaken. I don't have the article any more. If somebody is
positive it's another number then I'll go with it.

I agree with Don that if the M's can't afford to fork over the big bucks when
Junior comes up for his next contract then they are doomed to be a minor league
franchise to the other more lucrative clubs. Also what few fans they have 
here will desert them if they don't sign .Jr and they should probably move to
another city.

Seattle is and always will be primarily a football city. It's probably close
to PitsburgH in many respects.


Metz
3.47Opposite ends of the spectrum are rapidly moving apart...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 27 1991 19:0829
    
> Last I heard was that the 25 million was from all tv and radio rights for a 
> season. The yankess are pulling in 100 Mill in cable alone (like sportschannel),
> not counting radio, local broadcast (ala 38 for the Sox) and other cable (PIX).

    The Mariners are taking in about $10 million from CBS and $4 million
    from ESPN like everyone else.  That'd make $11 million from other
    sources, which sounds high but maybe the local outlets are getting
    taken to the cleaners, who knows.  By comparison, from today's Globe 
    the Brewers are taking in only $5 million from local sources, and I 
    thought that Seattle was in that ballpark.  The Red Sox take in $20 
    million from local TV, cable, and radio; the Yankees $50 million from
    MSG cable alone.
    
    I'd like to see MLB move towards dividing up the TV/radio money, but
    leave gate receipts (which seem to be more equitable, and more 
    a function of team performance) alone in order to maintain some 
    competition between clubs.  For those that think this is unfair to 
    teams like the Yankees, Dodgers, and Red Sox and more than a bit 
    socialistic, consider that baseball does hold an antitrust exemption 
    which legally prevents further expansion into markets like New York 
    and Boston, and protects any dilution of broadcast revenues for the
    owners of those ballclubs.  I for one would love to see National 
    League baseball in Boston, for instance, and would gladly pay money 
    to do so.  With the help of the government, MLB has made that an
    impossibility, though.
    
    glenn                     
    
3.48Much bigger population needed for baseballSHALOT::HUNTSwatch dogs and Diet Coke headsWed Mar 27 1991 19:3114
 If Seattle really wants a $100,000,000 broadcast TV deal, it should add
 about 6 or 7 million people to its population base first.   There is a
 reason why some things seem just a little bigger in New York City.
 
 Also, there is virtually *NO* comparison that can or should be made
 between a city's football fans and its baseball fans.   The Buffalo Bills
 draw well because they have a good team and also because they only play 8
 regular season games plus pre-season and playoff games there every year.  
 
 Baseball teams play 81 games a year at home.   It's very easy to fill the
 stands for the annual Bills-Dolphins game.  It'll be very hard to get the
 same 30,000 plus to come out every single night for baseball.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.49Border Line major league citiesCOGITO::HILLWed Mar 27 1991 20:1140
    re .42
    
    The idea of rotating border-line major league franchises is an
    intriguing one. One of the problems is that once a city loses a team
    (often not by fan support--Brooklyn) it is next to impossible for them 
    to get one back. 
    
    In European pro soccer, teams that finish last (usually the bottom 2 of
    a 16 to 18 team league, depending on the country) drop to the 2nd
    division (Triple A) and are replaced by the top 2 teams. So if a team
    hits the skids for a while, they can rebuild, then get themselves back
    in the big leagues IF they deserve it. 
    
    If baseball were to keep the 12 team leagues (keep the NL style
    schedule) and relegate a team every year, cities like Louisville, 
    Buffalo, Denver, Washington, etc. could have their chance, but if 
    they didn't survive, they just go back to being a triple A team.
    This way teams like the Indians and Braves would have to show a
    comittmet to at least TRY to be competitive. Geez, the Tribe hasn't
    been in a pennant race since the Eisenhower administration.
    
    Louisville is a case in point. A few years ago Jim Bunning was lobbying
    for expansion for Louisville (he's now a Kentucky senator), pointing to
    the good crowds they were getting. The thing was (is?) at that time the
    Reds were really stinking the joint out, and weren't drawing too well.
    Obviously, fans from Kentucky watched the Redbirds instead of the Reds
    if they were to go to a game. I wonder what kind of crowds Louisville
    draws NOW?
       
    The problem would be that the Louisville or Buffalo teams that could be
    border line ML cities would be stocked with farmhands belonging to
    major league teams. In soccer, the smaller teams are independent, and
    instead of Joe Prospect being called up to the bigs, Smallville United
    F.C. sells the Kid to Liverpool for 100,000 to 250,000 pounds, that is 
    used for operating expenses, or perhaps to buy players from teams even 
    lower on the food-chain. It probably works out the same in terms of how 
    much to the big boys spend on player development, but the small clubs CAN 
    make a run at the big time. 
    
    Tom
3.50On LouisvilleVAXWRK::SCHNEIDERThe crux of the biscuitWed Mar 27 1991 20:1920
    >Louisville is a case in point. A few years ago Jim Bunning was lobbying
    >for expansion for Louisville (he's now a Kentucky senator), pointing to
    >the good crowds they were getting. The thing was (is?) at that time the
    >Reds were really stinking the joint out, and weren't drawing too well.
    >Obviously, fans from Kentucky watched the Redbirds instead of the Reds
    >if they were to go to a game. I wonder what kind of crowds Louisville
    >draws NOW?
    
    The Louisville Cardinals still draw extremely well.  They are a case
    study in *excellently* run businesses.  I saw a recent documentary
    which brought them up and showed how they have created an atmosphere
    for quality family entertainment, run by conscientious individuals and
    are patronized by customers who appreciate the product they offer which
    is far more than baseball.
    
    They don't deserve your skepticism, but it also doesn't necessarily
    mean that the city deserves a major league team.  It's the way the
    franchise operates which is unique.
    
    Dan
3.51Too close for comfortCOGITO::HILLThu Mar 28 1991 16:2010
    OK, maybe so, but the point was that they drew at least *SOME* fans who
    probably would go to Cincinnati to see the Reds, but at that time the
    Reds were terrible and drew small(er) crowds. There WAS talk that
    Louisville could be a major leage team, but the proximity to Cincinnati
    makes it all but impossible. 
    
    A LOT of minor league franchises are much better run (in the business
    sense) than their major league counterparts.
    
    Tom 
3.52ECAMV3::JACOBHow It Got Here, I haven't a ClueMon Apr 01 1991 22:4510
    Heard today that the Braves waived Andres Thomas(SS) today.
    
    The midget(oops, treading dangerous ground here) who reportedly has
    beat him out is none other than former Pirate Raphael Belliard.
    
    Belliard is a good defensive shortstop but his lifetime batting average
    is somewhere around my bowling average.  Was Thomas that bad???????
    
    JaKe
    
3.53:-)EARRTH::BROOKSThe 83 Coogs, 88 Sooners, 91 UNLVWed Apr 03 1991 17:311
    Was your bowling average that good ?
3.54ECAMV3::JACOBHow It Got Here, I haven't a ClueWed Apr 03 1991 21:336
    re-.1  My best season I finished with a 184 avg(ten pins) and that's
    about where Belliard will finish this year.  Sure he's quick and good
    defensively, but the guy just can't hit the ball out of the infield.
    
    JaKe
    
3.55Who would name a team the Sun Rays?CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 15 1991 13:0210
    I saw in the paper this weekend that some of the expansion candidate
    cities have picked out names for their potential teams.  The one that
    sticks out in my mind is the Orlando Sun Rays.  Baaarrrffff!  There
    were a couple of others, but I can't remember them (Buffalo Bills might
    have been one).
    
    Interesting note was that the cities that already have names selected
    for the franchises are probably the least likely to get teams.  The
    other cities will hold contests to select names should they be awarded
    a franchise.
3.56Go Mudcats (AA, Pirates)SHALOT::MEDVIDwhen our worlds they fall apartWed May 15 1991 13:2312
    The Sun Rays is the name of Orlando's minor league team (AA, Twins).  I
    don't think that's such a bad name and their emblem, if I remember
    correctly, is quite stylish with this golden searay.
    
    There is also a team in Orlando's division named the Carolina Mudcats
    that has an emblem of this big catfish in a C.
    
    Bob Hunt and I went to the Charlotte Knights vs Memphis Chicks game
    last night.  Memphis has an indian chiefs head for an emblem.  Couldn't
    really understand that.
    
    	--dan'l
3.57CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 15 1991 13:295
3.58CAM::WAYJose, did you diddle Madonna?Wed May 15 1991 13:3811
Teams these days pick such wimpy names!

How bout the Orlando Diamondbacks (they have diamond back rattler's in 
Florida, right?)

I mean, get something MANLY.

Sheesh, with a name like the Sun Rays, you'll have guys named Blaine
and Antoine playing for you!

'Saw
3.59conjurs images of anita bryant with an orange!!!SHIRE::ELLISmiddle for diddleThu May 16 1991 07:381
3.60Zimmer is gonzoCELTIK::JACOBWould YOU go hunting with Ted Nugent?Wed May 22 1991 01:119
    Don Zimmer became the second manager in the National League to get the
    axe this season.  The first manager axed was Nick Leyva of the
    Phillies.
    
    Personally, I think that the Cub owners are acting irrationally.
    
    JaKe
    
    
3.61I'll miss his puffy little chipmunk cheeksSHALOT::MEDVIDwhen our worlds they fall apartWed May 22 1991 11:536
    The Cubs are only one game under .500 and it's only May.  Do they
    really think Zimmer was the problem?  Stupid.
    
    I hope he turns up somewhere soon.  He's second only to Billy Ball.
    
    	--dan'l
3.62CELTIK::JACOBImpriso..er..Married 9 years todayWed May 22 1991 18:508
    I agree Dan'l, the Cubs players are where their problem lies right
    now.Most of the Multi-million $$$ free agents they went out and bought
    during the off-season are hitting somewhere around their weight.  What
    they should be hitting is somewhere around Zimmer's weight.  Then the
    club would have been in 1st place by 9 games.
    
    Jake
    
3.63CELTIK::JACOBImpriso..er..Married 9 years todayThu May 23 1991 00:496
    Don't know the guys name, but the Cubs hired a new manager today.  He
    was the manager of their AAA club in, I think,, Omaha, ending Joe
    Altobelli's one day stint as manager.
    
    JaKe
    
3.64AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu May 23 1991 11:1710
	Don Zimmer is an ironhead gerbil.  Remember two years ago when 
everybody in this notesfile was gaga over the Cubs?  Remember who said the 
Zimmer factor would be instrumental in a San Francisco victory in the NLCS?
If Zip gets another job I hope the team he goes to has a rubberarmed 
reliever (Soup Campbell) and no player whose lifestyle is contrary to what 
blubberhead believes it should be, or said player will spend a lot of time on 
the bench (Bernie Carbo and Bill Lee).  How the guy keeps getting a job is 
a tribute to baseball's "good ole boy" syndrome.

				/Don
3.65STAR::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu May 23 1991 12:0711
    re .63, the new cubs manager is Jim Essian; he had been manager of the
    Cubs' triple-A Iowa team.
      
    Frankly, I don't see why so many people picked the Cubs to win the NL
    East.  Going into this season they reminded me of the pre-Clemens Red
    Sox, great offense but not enough pitching....the Pirates have
    comparable offense and *much* deeper starting pitching (even had D.
    Jackson and Harkey stayed healthy).
    
    
    py
3.66Another No-Hitter...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBe Excellent to Each OtherThu May 23 1991 19:414
    It was reported in another conference, byu ex Sports-noter Spud, that
    Tommy Greene of the Phillies has pitched a no-hitter...
    
    JD
3.67CARROL::LEFEBVREI'm digging for fireFri May 24 1991 11:494
    Apparently Greene walked 7 and whiffed 10.  Must have been an
    adventure.
    
    Mark.
3.68BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Fri May 24 1991 19:0013
    The organizing committee for bringing baseball to Denver has decided on
    purple as one of the prospective team's colors. Reasons: No other Major
    League teams have purple as a color, and the correlation to the purple
    majestic Rocky Mountains.  They say there's little chance the team will 
    be called the Bears (Good!!), mainly because when someone says Bears, 
    most people think of the Chicago Bears.  Possible names being tossed 
    around are Rockies, Cougars, and Grizzlies.  No mention of whether the 
    team would be called Denver or Colorado, but my guess is it would be 
    Denver.  From what I hear, they want to have a team name, colors, logo,
    and uniforms ready for the announcement of the 2 expansion cities on 
    June 12th.
    
    Joe
3.69MCIS1::DHAMELLiving the life of a pinballFri May 24 1991 19:418
    
    "The Colorado Purple Majestic Mountain Grizzlies" is a fine name.  They
    could call 'em just "The Rockies" for short, and their theme song could
    be "Gonna Fly (out) Now" sung by John Cougar.  But please, don't mix
    any orange with the purple.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.70BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSTue May 28 1991 14:366
    Joe, I heard that it's going to be Colorado ....., instead of Denver
    ....., because they want more of a regional appeal.  I agree with that
    because when they were promoting the club to MLB, they said that it
    would draw from all of the Rocky Mountain Region, not just Denver.
    
    Glenn
3.71CSC32::J_HERNANDEZFlunk me? Flunk HIM!Tue May 28 1991 14:382
    I know I'll be going when the Dodgers are in town!  8^)
    
3.72Colorado RockiesOURGNG::RIGGENI need some sensible shoesTue May 28 1991 17:434
It's been heavily rumored that the "Mythical" team is gonna be called the 
Colorado Rockies. They will have a BEAR as a mascot. 

Jeff
3.73FDCV06::KINGJesse's Jets!Tue May 28 1991 17:504
    The Hockey team sucked big time, what would they name their baseball
    team after those losers???
    
    REK
3.74CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue May 28 1991 17:513
    Another team name rumor floating about is that the next club in
    Washington, D.C. will be known as the Nationals rather than the
    Senators.
3.75looking like a long summerSTAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles/Patriots/why me?Tue May 28 1991 17:577
    re .74:
    
    Never mind major league baseball in DC.  Bring it back to Baltimore
    first.  :-(
    
    
    py
3.76I like the "Bears"NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue May 28 1991 18:5618
                 
    > Another team name rumor floating about is that the next club in
    > Washington, D.C. will be known as the Nationals rather than the
    > Senators.
    
    I don't think that's a rumor; I think the committee in Washington
    announced officially that the name would be the "Nationals".  Won't
    make much difference, though, as due to questions over the lack of  
    local deep-pockets ownership Washington appears to be all but out of 
    the running.
    
    I think Denver's a lock at this point.  By all rights, tradition
    dictates that the team be called the Denver Bears.  Short, simple, 
    with years of use behind it.  Colorado Rockies, Rocky Mountains, 
    Zephyrs, etc. don't cut it, in my opinion.
    
    glenn
    
3.77'Rockies' it isBSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue May 28 1991 19:158
    Yea, I also heard the nickname will be the Rockies, whether it's Denver
    or Colorado.  The logo probably won't be a bear, but it may be
    incorporated into the uniformor logo much in the same way the A's use the
    elephant.  Look for the logo to be something along the lines of the
    hockey team's old logo or the one used for the Final 4 last year.
    
    Joe
    
3.78GENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelTue May 28 1991 20:108
    
    	The majority of an opinion poll agrees with you Glen on
    	naming them the Bears.  Who gives a rat's patoot if they
    	have the same mascot as some team in another state?  Not
    	every single team in America/Canada can have a unique 
    	mascot.  The "Denver Bears" sounds good to me too.....
    
    	Claybone
3.79BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSTue May 28 1991 20:585
    If memory serves (not a given!) MLB, "strongly suggested" to the
    ownership group that the team NOT be called the Bears.
    
    Glenn
    
3.80BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue May 28 1991 21:1213
>    MLB, "strongly suggested" to the
>    ownership group that the team NOT be called the Bears.
   
    That's pretty much the case.  I'm just glad to hear they won't be called 
    the Bears.    
    
    As for the cities still in the running, everything I've read and heard
    has indicated the only 3 cities still in serious contention are Miami,
    Tampa/St. Pete, and Denver.  Buffalo, Washington, and Orlando are all
    but out of the race for an expansion team this time around.
    
    Joe 
        
3.81CSC32::J_HERNANDEZFlunk me? Flunk HIM!Tue May 28 1991 21:197
    Rocky Mountain Oysters
    Denver Boulders
    Aurora Borealisises (the suburb)
    Denver Diamondbacks. 
    
    Just a few thoughts.
    
3.82RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed May 29 1991 14:555
    Nah, I like the Denver Elways. The mascot could be a baseball with the
    picture of a palomino horse in the middle.
    
    Rich
    
3.83CARROL::LEFEBVREI'm digging for fireWed May 29 1991 15:033
    The Colorado Colada-Sipping Soccer Yuppies.
    
    Mark.
3.84FMCSSE::BROWNsaid the Joker to the QueenWed May 29 1991 15:458
    
    At least they will not have to play in the whimpy American League,
    those of us here in the Rockies will be able to see real teams, not
    the has been's from the American East.
    
    Cadzilla
    
    Denver SkySox?
3.85Ahhh balls!!CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Wed May 29 1991 16:337
Howsabout da Denva Collies! I know Hoot and Monty, where ever they are would
preciate that name! Or better yet, the Denver Oysters.




Steve
3.86CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 29 1991 19:385
3.87RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed May 29 1991 19:405
    Whoops, I forgot, how about the Denver Excitings? They could have
    "mood" uniforms that glow everytime a Bronco player farts.
    
    Rich
    
3.88GENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelWed May 29 1991 19:495
    
    	Hey Mac, lest we forget, the Reds from the mighty NL 
    	West won the WS lasted year.
    
    	Claybone :^)
3.89You tell'm ClayboneFMCSSE::BROWNsaid the Joker to the QueenWed May 29 1991 19:511
    
3.90CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed May 29 1991 20:145
    And the 16th best team in the NHL almost walked off with the Stanley
    Cup...
    
    Didn't the Reds play <= .500 ball following the All Star break last
    year?  They certainly put things back together for 4 games though.
3.91CSC32::J_HERNANDEZFlunk me? Flunk HIM!Wed May 29 1991 20:5636
    Lesse...
    WEST 			East
    
    90 Reds win WS
    89 Giants lose WS
    88 Dodgers win WS
    				87 Cards lose WS
    				86 Mets win WS
    				85 Cards lose WS
    84 Padres lose WS
    				83 Phillies lose WS
    				82 Cards win WS
    81 Dodgers win WS
    
    3-2                         2-3
    
    West 			East
    
    90 A's lose WS
    89 A's win WS
    88 A's lose WS
    87 Twins win WS
    				86 Boston lose WS
    85 Royals win WS
    				84 Tigers win WS
    				83 Orioles win WS
    				82 Brewers lose WS
    				81 Yankees lose WS
    
    West 3-2 			2-3
    
                                   
    Seems the NL West isn't as bad as first thought. Looking at the trend
    it seems that the East was better in the first half of the decade where
    the West is better over the last 5 years. We'll have to see what 1991
    brings.
3.92:^)CARROL::LEFEBVREDoin' it againThu May 30 1991 11:384
    Er, Mac....I'd bet my last dollar that you'd be tickled pink if the Red
    Sox went 0-81 after the All-Star break, yet win the WS.
    
    Mark.
3.93Is Mac a Dean fan or what? ;^)GENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelThu May 30 1991 13:104
    
    	Thankeee kindly there LuFay.  Ya beat me to it.
    
    	Claybone_who's_tickled_pink_the_Reds_won_it_all
3.94What's wrong with traditional names?COGITO::HILLFri May 31 1991 17:1119
    re: a few back
    
    Why did the league object to the "Bears" so much? Isn't that the
    traditional name that Denver's minor league teams have had for years
    (until the ZerOfers recently). A LOT of expansion teams have kept the
    names of the minor league teams. The SD Padres, LA Angels and (I think)
    the Seattle Pilots were originally PCL teams and kept the names when
    they wnet Big-time. 
    
    Montreal Used to be a Dodger team known as the Royals, KC was the
    Blues, a Ynakee farm team, but all the other newer teams are relocated
    from somewhere else. Actually, I think the Milwaukee Brewers was the
    name of a team from a long time ago (pre-Braves) and they revived the
    name.
    
    ANY name is better than some of these ridiculous singular names that,
    unlike the leisure suit, survived beyond the '70s.
    
    Tom 
3.95RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceFri May 31 1991 17:545
    Baltimore's minor league team was the Orioles before the St Louis
    Browns moved there.
    
    Rich
    
3.96Da Managerial Procession OutTheDoor Continues!!CELTIK::JACOBDO NOTHING....and then RestTue Jun 04 1991 03:245
    Buck Rodgers got the axe from the Expos today.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.97St. Pete, what're you gonna do with that dome? BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Wed Jun 05 1991 14:4410
    It's reported in both the Rocky Mountain News and the Miami Herald that
    the latest rumors indicate Miami and Denver will be awarded expansion
    franchises next week.  Miami is supposedly #1 on the list due to their
    strong financial ownership group.  
    
    But, there's also some bad news.  The latest rumor in Denver is that
    the team would be called the Grizzlies.  Stick with Rockies, guys.
    
    Joe
    
3.98CAM::WAYRuck till you puke...Wed Jun 05 1991 15:477
HEY, what's wrong with Grizzlies?  There's a famous rugby team by that
name, and I think it's kind of manly....  Why it makes me think of some
of those stories Claywad tells.....

8^)

'Saw
3.99Miami? Has to be a rumor.SHALOT::MEDVIDPittsburgh: city of champions again!Wed Jun 05 1991 16:134
    No St. Pete?  What the hail are they going to do with that huge
    stadium?  I can't believe they would get snubbed.
    
    	--dan'l
3.100RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Jun 05 1991 16:384
    Hey, what happened to the Denver Elways?
    
    Rich
    
3.101GENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelWed Jun 05 1991 17:0416
    
    	Grizzlies?  That's assa9 (er, I mean stupid)!  There hasn't
    	been a grizzly sighted in Colorado since 1976.  They should
    	call them the Bears (according to the opinion poll they
    	took).  Somebody from the proposed team management was
    	quoted as saying that they are hoping for the disenchantment
    	with the name "Rockies" will blow over.  That's a great way
    	to start off a team/city relationship.  
    
    	I personally vote for "Bears" due to the bad history
    	surrounding the "Colorado Rockies" name.
    
    	Rich, they couldn't find anybody to be the mascot (nobody
    	wif big 'nuff teef that is!)
    
    	Claybone
3.102What they should be named!RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOShould I stay or should I go....Wed Jun 05 1991 17:099
    I like the Denver Marmots.  
    
    Or how bout the Denver Aspens?
    
    The Denver Water Rights?
    
    Nope, I like Denver Marmots...
    
    JD
3.103Rockies = I think of MorgannaBASEX::BROWNWed Jun 05 1991 17:155
    
    I kind of like the Rockies.  You could get Morganna the Kissing Bandit
    to be the mascot for the team.  With those Mts. she would be perfect.
    
    \pjb
3.1048^)CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Wed Jun 05 1991 17:415
I still like the Colorado Collies, why not give the whole state somin'
to root for.


Steve
3.105NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jun 05 1991 17:5711
    
    The Miami Herald is reporting today that the Expansion Committee is
    definitely recommending the Miami franchise to the MLB owners, and 
    most likely the Denver franchise as the second expansion team.  The
    Miami team will be called the Florida Marlins, unless St. Pete gets the
    other team (unlikely), in which case they will be called the Miami
    Marlins.
    
    glenn
    
    
3.106RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Jun 05 1991 18:125
    Marlins, huh? AMC used to make a car called a Marlin. Looked like an
    ugly AMC Javelin.
    
    Rich
    
3.107FMCSSE::BROWNsaid the Joker to the QueenWed Jun 05 1991 18:212
    
    Rocky Mtn's Rejects
3.108CELTIK::JACOBDO NOTHING....and then RestWed Jun 05 1991 18:489
    
    Howsabout the Denver QuicheEaters????
    
    At least Elway would fit in!!!.
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.109No new NL teamsTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is walking!!Thu Jun 06 1991 12:364
I didn't get a chance to read the story, but today's paper reports that the NL
expansion has been put on hold indefinitely.  Sorry Denver, Miami.

=Bob=
3.110NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jun 06 1991 14:0910
    
> I didn't get a chance to read the story, but today's paper reports that the NL
> expansion has been put on hold indefinitely.  Sorry Denver, Miami.
    
    Not necessarily the expansion, just the announcement (which was
    supposed to be next week).  The NL and AL are still squabbling over the
    money...
    
    glenn
    
3.111Money and Politics, necessarily in that order :(BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Thu Jun 06 1991 15:1214
    This delay has COP-OUT written all over it.  It's kind typical of
    baseball after they put expansion off for so many years.
    
    As Glenn W. said, money is the big road block.  $190 million, and how 
    it will be distributed to be specific.  The AL wants their piece of the 
    pie, understandably so.  Also, there is the very small issue is how 
    much of a part the AL will play in the expansion draft.      
    
    You also have to wonder if the rumors yesterday about Miami and Denver
    being the 2 cities have anything to do with this wimpy-a$$ed coput. 
    St. Pete obviously doesn't like hearing that, and they the pressure 
    the committee to put the decision on the back burner to bide time.
    
    Joe
3.112LAGUNA::MAY_BReach 60 = 200Thu Jun 06 1991 23:2520
    
    One of the things that I heard soured the announcement is the fact the
    guy guy who backed the Miami entry is having financial problems.  He
    owns Blockbuster Entertainment, and witn Markie and his friends having
    watched every video on earth already they are all now watching Nots
    Withstanding and other such soap operas.  Having lost much of the
    lucrative, velour covered, yuppie market, Blockbuster's stock has
    halved its price in about 9 months.  
    
    My guess at what happened is that they were ready to announce Dever and
    Miami, but got skeered because the guy with the bucks may not be
    around, so they decided to wait and see (after all, Dances with Wolves
    is coming out on video soon, so Markie will rent that).  If things are
    OK, Miami is in, if not it's St. Pete.
    
    Bruce
    
    PS  How about the Collar[ado] Sister Kissers?  Fits the state's image,
    is plural, and illiterative-- the 3 most important specifications for a
    team name.
3.113CARROL::LEFEBVRESir Not-Appearing-In-This-NoteFri Jun 07 1991 11:308
    Broose, them's fightin' woids.
    
    I *don't* watch Snots Landing.  Wifey-poo does.  In fack, my guitar
    lessons are on Thursdays, so pfftt.
    
    And how *did* I get pulled into this?
    
    Mark.
3.114Alliteracy hurts?SOFBAS::TRINWARDMaker of fine scrap-paper since 1949Fri Jun 07 1991 13:328
RE: .112

>>	Colorado Sister-Kissers ... illiterative ...

Was that an intentional misspelling, and innocent malaprop, or just
another Noter trying to sound *eddicated*...??   (;^})

- Steve, who's_always_trying_to_teach_our_native_language
3.115More on expansionCOGITO::HILLFri Jun 07 1991 14:1558
    Yesterday's SI had an article about this topic. They rated the cities
    on several categories, such as population base, TV market, ballpark,
    proximity to other teams, etc. They also listed biggest asset & biggest
    drawbacks.
    
    For Miami the biggest drawback was the rainy summer weather, and the
    biggest asset was the megabucks guy, since, in addition to the $95 
    million expansion fee, teams need another $30-35 million just for minor 
    league infrastructure, front office, uniforms/equipment, players, etc. 
    This is not including ML payroll. Consider the salaries and the quality 
    of players these teams would get. Wes Gardner at $1.4 million a year....
    What a steal! 
    
    If the Miami owner is having $$ problems, it seems St. Pete would be a
    contendah. Either that, or an existing team (Seattle?) might be
    persuaded to move there. The draback is that they would play in an
    ug-lee dome with astro turf and air conditioning. A friend of mine in
    Florida said that even at night it's hotter than hell in the summer, so
    this it the only way they could get people to come out(in)doors. (Even
    Norman Schwartzkopf could only attract 28,000 to Tampa Stadium, so if
    you think they are going to pack an outdoor park to see Joe Hesketh 
    pitch to Daryl Boston...)
    
    Denver looks like a good bet, but is dependent on peripheral states
    for support, much like the KC Royals. As the only team in the Mountain
    time zone would also make travel easier as a stopover to the west
    coast.
    
    Orlando would have to play in the Royals spring training home, Baseball
    City for a few years until a new park was built. It is also hurt by
    being the 3rd chioce in Florida, and still reasonably close (2 hours?)
    to the Tampa-St. Pete area.
    
    Washington is too close to the Baltimore Orioles, who draw 20% of their
    fan base from the DC area. Also, the new park is a little closer to DC,
    so that would eventually raise the same questions that came up when the
    Senators left before. Vincent said they would "go where baseball
    isn't," so that certainly points to Denver and Florida, and not
    Washington.
    
    Buffalo shot itself in the foot by (very sanely) saying that it was too
    ridiculous to play high-cost baseball the way mediocre players were
    getting H-U-G-E contracts. They've got a nice park and reasonable
    ticket prices, which would certainly change if they joined the NL, so 
    they'll probably stay a triple A team. 
    
    The most important rule is that any city that proposes a singular name
    should be IMMEDIATELY dropped from the list. Miami Marlins is good,
    Buffalo Bisons is good, Washington Nationals is OK. Denver/Colarado, with
    Purple as their color, could be in trouble, depending on the second
    color (gold would be good, but they'll probably knuckle under to the 
    ski-yuppie crowd and go with mauve, teal, aqua, peach, etc.) Haven't heard
    anything about the Tampa-St.Pete name proposals, but as long as they
    don't consult the bozo that chose their hockey name they have a chance.
    The person who chose "Orlando Sun Rays" should be SHOT. It's just as
    well that they won't get a team.
    
    Tom     
3.116"Sun Rays" already in useSHALOT::HUNTDust. Wind. Dude.Fri Jun 07 1991 14:2713
3.117:^)CARROL::LEFEBVRESir Not-Appearing-In-This-NoteFri Jun 07 1991 15:1214
  <<< Note 3.114 by SOFBAS::TRINWARD "Maker of fine scrap-paper since 1949" >>>
                             -< Alliteracy hurts? >-


    Maybe you should practice what you preach?
    
              <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                          -< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 13.1607                     TRADE RUMORS                       1607 of 1607
SOFBAS::TRINWARD "Maker of fine scrap-paper since 19" 0 lines   7-JUN-1991 11:02
                        -< Bring baczk the Spike-man! >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
3.118FYI:SOFBAS::TRINWARDMaker of fine scrap-paper since 1949Fri Jun 07 1991 15:1716
RE: previous note:

A typo 

	"baczk" 

due to too-fast fingers


does not equal a misused word 

	"illiterative",

... at least not in my book    8^}

- Steve, who's_still_trying_to_bring_baczk_(tm)_English_as_a_first_language
3.119BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Jun 07 1991 15:275
    Steve, who's_always_trying_to_teach_our_native_language
    
    Just what Indian language are you trying to teach?
    
    Lee
3.120The Hahahaha dialect...SOFBAS::TRINWARDMaker of fine scrap-paper since 1949Fri Jun 07 1991 16:140
3.121RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Jun 10 1991 16:478
    Actually the holdup has to do with the Screen Animal Guild. You see,
    they are demanding a percentage of the prospective Denver/Colorado logo
    that will be on the outfield walls of many NL parks. Since Mr. Ed was a
    bona fide member of the SAG, royalty payments must be made by any team
    displaying the Denver/Colorado logo.
    
    Rich
    
3.122CARROL::LEFEBVREDon't make me dream about youMon Jun 10 1991 18:083
    Rich, wouldn't the Colorado Lassies have the same dilemma?
    
    Mark.
3.123Right over my head, almost...SOFBAS::TRINWARDMaker of fine scrap-paper since 1949Mon Jun 10 1991 18:1919
RE: .121

>>   Actually the holdup has to do with the Screen Animal Guild. You see,
                                                   ^^^^^^ 
>>  they are demanding a percentage of the prospective Denver/Colorado logo
>>  that will be on the outfield walls of many NL parks. Since Mr. Ed was a
							       ^^^^^^
>>  bona fide member of the SAG, royalty payments must be made by any team
>>  displaying the Denver/Colorado logo.
    
>>   Rich
    
Whew!  I read that one quickly, and was trying figure out why the "Screen
Actors [sic] Guild" and "Mr. Ed (Asner)" would have problems with the
logo...

Clever, whether intended or not...!

- Steve, who_just_hopes_the_Stallions_don't_leave_too_many_*apples*_around
3.124RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Jun 10 1991 18:197
    Thas rite, Mark. The Collies or the Elways. Heck, even if it's the
    Grizzlies or the Bears, Gentle Ben's agent is liable to file suit. 
    
    Just that national anti-Denver bias coming to the forefront.
    
    Rich
    
3.125PLAY BALL, DENVER!!!!BSS::JCOTANCHColorado Football: #1 for 1990Tue Jun 11 1991 13:4520
    It's all but official now, Denver will be playing in the NL starting
    with the 1993 season!  The expansion committee has recommended Denver 
    and Miami, as new cities, and the owners need only approve that
    recommendation.  That official approval could come tomorrow at the
    owners' meeting, but most likely won't happen for about 2 or 3 weeks.
    
    Team colors are purple, black, and silver.  It's a nice color scheme,
    but I've always felt 3 colors were one too many.  The Seachickens are the
    only team I can think of that use three colors other than white.  A
    logo and team name are expected to be unveiled in the next 7-10 days.
    
    According to Baseball Tonight last night, the Miami team will be called
    either the South Florida or Miami Marlins.  They should go with Miami
    IMO.  I can't see why they don't want to call them Florida, because
    there's a good chance St. Pete could get a team within the next decade
    or so either by exapansion or another team moving there.  I just don't
    think South Florida would sound good.
    
    Joe
    
3.126$$$SHALOT::MEDVIDPittsburgh: city of champions again!Tue Jun 11 1991 14:0514
    RE: South Florida
    
    Having lived and worked in Boca Raton in the past, I can understand the
    push for this moniker.  Miami is the hub of South Florida (a.k.a. the
    Gold Coast), but the spokes (Boca, Ft. Lauderdale, Delray Beach, Palm
    Beach, Hollywood, Miami Beach etc.) like to think of themselves as part
    of the whole picture...when the picture is good.  They distance
    themselves from Miami when you talk of crime and other negatives.  This
    is just another effort for all the Gold Coast wealthies to feel a part
    of what will be a "nice thing" about the area.
    
    Wasn't the Marlins the name of a team Miami once had? 
    
    	--dan'l
3.127More than double your money in 7 yearsBASEX::BROWNTue Jun 11 1991 14:268
    
    Back in 1984 when Tom Monaghan bought the Tigers he paid $50 million.
    
    Not a bad return on his investment if a new team cost $95 million 
    plus $35 million franchise fee.
    
    \pjb
    
3.128M's will be here for the 90's at least...DECWET::METZGERHow about those M's?Tue Jun 11 1991 17:5515
What's all this talk about the Mariners possibly moving to St. Pete in the 
future? The team has a long term lease on the kingdome and they've been drawing
pretty good crowds for the past 2 seasons. 

I haven't heard a word about it locally but ESPN and CNN seem to mention this
rumor with every breath.

I could see the Indians moving out of Cleveland for St. Pete but I don't see the
M's moving in the near future. Now that they've got a decent team they should
remain in the area (and draw fairly well) for quite some time. If they had a 
decent stadium (removable roof) they'd draw even better.


Metz
3.129NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jun 11 1991 18:0710
    
    I think the Indians and Astros are the most likely candidates to
    be making moves...
    
    glenn
    
    
    
    
                                                    
3.130CSC32::GL_JOHNSONLA:Mother of all comebacksTue Jun 11 1991 18:1814
    
    	I can see the Indians possibly making a move, but why the Astros?
    Are they doing that badly in Houston & the Dome?
    
    	After all the years of carrot dangling, it's about time that 
    Denver got a baseball team.  Granted the team won't be competitive
    for a few years, but it will draw good crowds as there are lots of
    transplants from all over the country and they brought their previous
    baseball allegiances with them.  Plus, it would give the Donks some
    serious competition as for sports attention.  Not to mention that I'd
    get a chance to see the Mets whenever they're in town. :-)
    
    
    						 glen j.
3.131CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jun 11 1991 19:293
    I believe that the 'Stros are for sale.  After spending the last few
    years in the cellar, excercising a self imposed salary cap, and dumping
    players, the attendance isn't what it was.
3.132Soapbox TimeRDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Jun 11 1991 19:3128
    I am totally against naming a franchise after a state. The California
    Angels should be the LA Angels. They draw heavily from LA County,
    probably have games televised by LA stations and probably have games
    aired on LA radio stations.
    
    Ditto Minnesota North Stars, Twins and Vikings. Name them either
    Minneapolis or St. Paul. But pick one!
    
    Ditto Texas Rangers - Should be Dallas or Ft Worth Rangers. Pick one.
    Does Arlington have a TV or radio station?
    
    Golden State Warriors sounds ridiculous to me. Call 'em either San
    Francisco or Oakland Warriors.
    
    New England Patriots should be either the Boston or Providence
    Patriots. I lean towards Boston because advertising revenues to Boston
    stations is higher.
    
    New Jersey Devils should be called the Hackensack Devils.
    
    Griffith started this trend in 1960 when he moved the Senators to
    Minneapolis and called the team the Minnesota Twins. Then Finley got a
    hockey franchise and called them the California Golden Seals. 
    
    I don't like it.
    
    Rich
    
3.133RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Jun 11 1991 19:475
    Whoops - forgot the Utah Jazz. Now someone tell me THAT name makes
    sense!
    
    Rich
    
3.134RAVEN1::B_ADAMSPoconose no boundries!Tue Jun 11 1991 21:2710
3.135L.A. DREAMINGWMOIS::E_FASSETTWed Jun 12 1991 15:2011
    RE: 132
    
    The California Angels should never be called the L.A. Angels. If
    anything it should be the Anahiem Angels, also the L.A. Rams should be
    the Anaheim Rams. Both these teams are in Orange County, and are about
    an hour drive from Los Angeles. Although they do draw a lot of fans frm
    L.A county the majority of people who attend these games come from
    Orange County.
    
    ED who used to live in L.A. (it was only 5 minutes to Dodger Stadium
    but an hour to Anahiem stadium).
3.136AXIS::ROBICHAUDWed Jun 12 1991 15:323
    	Hey Rich, how do you know the New York Giants/Yankees/Mets/Rangers
    /Knicks/Jets aren't really using the state name and not the city
    name?
3.137Yeah, and since when did New England become a STATE???CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis today??Wed Jun 12 1991 15:491
    
3.138RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Jun 12 1991 16:188
    re /Don - ya GOT me, big guy.
    
    re Angels and Rams. 
    
    Anaheim is OK by me.
    
    Rich
    
3.139CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jun 12 1991 16:515
    I have no problem with a team being associated with an area, be it New
    England or a state.  They draw fans from a much larger area than the
    city they play in, so why not have the team name reflect their fan
    base?  You also have several teams which play their games in the
    suburbs and not in the city they are named after.
3.140GENRAL::WADEIBeenDrivinAllNight...MyHandsWetOnTheWheelWed Jun 12 1991 16:529
    
    	Well, I've changed my mind regarding the team name for the
    	Denver/Colorado franchise.  In honor of all those mountain
    	men we used to/still have, they should be called the Denver/
    	Colorado "Johnsons" (you know, as in Jeremiah!) :^)
    
    	Claybone
    
    	ps  Yeehaw!  I get to see the Reds play now!
3.141RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOShould I stay or should I go....Wed Jun 12 1991 23:125
    I think the NY Jets should be known as the RON Jets.
    
    HTH
    
    HH
3.142EARRTH::BROOKSLet's get it together ...Thu Jun 13 1991 21:565
    I read in today's Hearld that DAve Dravecky will undergo surgery next
    Tuesday to amputate his left arm in an effort to stop infection and arm
    problems as a result of the tumors that he had.
    
    Sad.
3.143BOSOX::TIMMONSI'm a Pepere!Fri Jun 14 1991 10:064
    Yeah, I read that today, too.  What a shame.  The poor guy has already
    had a very bad time with it, and now it's past saving.
    
    Lee
3.144NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jun 14 1991 12:2511
    
    > Yeah, I read that today, too.  What a shame.  The poor guy has already
    > had a very bad time with it, and now it's past saving.
    
    The irony is that the comeback he made, which eventually resulted in
    him breaking it twice, probably cost him the use of the arm.  He has no
    regrets though, and I've got to admire him for deciding to go ahead and
    do what he loved best at whatever risk...
    
    glenn
    
3.145TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Mon Jun 17 1991 13:095
Loved those mid'60s uniforms that Cinci and Philladelphia wore yesterday!  It
was a great throwback.  Was it some kind of old timers day or something in 
Philly?

=Bob=
3.146Tougher than his previous come backSHALOT::MEDVIDthe addiction of duplicitiesThu Jun 20 1991 13:277
    
    For the record, Dave Dravecky had his arm and shoulder amputated
    yesterday to keep his cancer from spreading.  Doctors are not
    commenting, but all indications is that he should recover soon and get
    on with his life.
    
    
3.147Hope I'm right!TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Thu Jun 20 1991 14:118
RE: Dravecky

I had heard that doctors stated that his prognosis for rull recovery was "very 
good".

Wish him the best.

=Bob=
3.148Charlotte worth mentioning...SHALOT::MEDVIDthe addiction of duplicitiesThu Jun 20 1991 19:2724
    Last night, some big hoohas were in Charlotte to attend a Charlotte
    Knights baseball game and consider the site for expansion to one of the
    new AAA clubs.
    
    The Knights' only gimmic to get people to the park was to be a softball
    game between the Hornets and the local media.  However, at about 5:30
    the skies opened up in a big way.  The softball game was cancelled. 
    The weather cleared around gametime enough to start playing ball
    in front of
    
    
    
    9,200+ fans. 
    
    When you consider the weather conditions and the fact that they weren't
    giving away a car or a year's supply of Spam or anything like that,
    that's mighty impressive.  These league officials had attended a 
    Birmingham Barons (also in the running for AAA) game the night before
    for a game that attracted just under 6,000 on a 3 for the price of 1
    ticket giveaway.
    
    Bob Hunt, it's gonna happen!
    
    	--dan'l
3.149Alright !!!GOLDKY::HUNTI just want to help the ballclub ...Thu Jun 20 1991 19:5518
 That's great news, Dan'l.   
 
 If I had been in town, it would have been 9,200+ plus 1.
 
 For the record, the Charlotte Knights were the attendance leaders in *all*
 of AA ball lasted year and they outdrew many AAA teams as well.  And the
 team was brutal.   The record for one night was 12,500+ in a 10,000 seat
 stadium with grassy overflow areas.   That was the night "The Chicken" was
 in town.   He really is a hoot.
 
 This year the team is just a little better than lasted year's wretched
 squad and the attendance is hanging in there, too.   9,200 has to be the
 top crowd of the year so far since "The Chicken" hasn't been there yet
 this year.
 
 AAA ball in Charlotte ???   Has a nice ring to it.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.150Chicken & Clown Prince have come and goneSHALOT::MEDVIDthe addiction of duplicitiesFri Jun 21 1991 12:149
    For the record, Bob, you missed The Chicken.  Last Friday, Max Padkin
    was there and Saturday was The Chicken's night.  Cliff and I went, but
    when we got to the exit at 6:30 and the traffic was backed up to the
    welcome center (1 mile) we turned around and went to a sports bar in
    Dilworth.
    
    See ya tonight, dude.
    
    	--dan'l
3.151Damn!GOLDKY::HUNTI just want to help the ballclub ...Fri Jun 21 1991 13:1210
 Dan'l,
 
 What was the attendance for Chicken Night lasted Friday in Charlotte ??? 
 
 Also, I believe The Chicken will be in Charlotte *twice* this season.   In
 addition, the Phillie Phanatic will be there, too, for a one-game visit in
 August sometime.   You know me and the MicroHUNTs will be there for that
 one.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.152CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Jun 21 1991 13:343
    It was reported in the Baseball conference that the Denver franchise
    has settled on a name of the team.  They will be caled the Colorado
    Rockies and have a bear as a mascot.
3.153CAM::WAYToonces, the Rugby Playing Cat....Fri Jun 21 1991 13:549
re Denver: 

	Darn, I was hoping for the "Rocky Mountain Oysters".....

re Chicken Night:

	When they have Smelt Night, could someone please let me know....

'Saw
3.154Pi-RightsSHALOT::MEDVIDkiss them for meTue Jul 09 1991 16:2312
    Up until two days ago, the Pirates had maintained the best winning
    percentage in baseball (LA surpassed them by one game Saturday). 
    However, there are only two Pirates on the NL All-Star team, Bobby
    Bonilla and John Smiley.  
    
    That's either the mark of a great team playing as a team, a terrific
    bench, a great manager, or a combination of all three.
    
    And if you ask me, Bonilla doesn't necessarily deserve to be there let
    alone starting at DH hitting .286.
    
    	--dan'l
3.155Dion skipping out during race...TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey is a toddler now!Thu Aug 01 1991 12:019
dan'l mentioned Dion Sanders in the Pittsburgh Pirates note, and it reminded me
of something I saw in the paper this morning.  It said that he is supposed to 
report to Falcon training camp nexted week.  The story I read said that he asked for some
time off in between, and that the Falcons said no.

Kinda stinks for the Braves, who are in the middle (okay, the outskirts of the
middle) of a pennant fight, to lose a starting player.  I guess $$$ rules again.

=Bob=
3.156tick tick tickSHALOT::MEDVIDboys have wants, girls have needsThu Aug 01 1991 12:457
    Sanders is only starting because the Braves, like the Bucs, are hit by
    the injury train (as Jake so eloquently put it).  He was only hitting
    around .200.  
    
    Countdown to Deon Doom starts this Sunday.
    
    	--dan'l
3.157Possibly the best game of the year (and I was there!)RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Aug 02 1991 11:5426
    re: .-1
    
    No, Deion didn't start because of injuries.  The Braves gave him a
    start because it was his last (baseball) game of the year.  The timing
    worked out well because it allowed Ron Gant to serve a 1-game
    suspension at the same time.  Whoever made the decision to start him
    deserves a kudo, cause his 3-run homer was *huge*.  
    
    I was at the game and the fans of Atlanta seem to be taking an actual
    liking to the young man.  Every at-bat was greeted with decent applause
    - absolutely no booing.  (His BA was around .190.)  When he hit the HR
    the fans *demanded* a curtain call, and when the Braves pulled a
    double-switch in the 7th and took him out he got a rousing standing
    "O", which "Prime Time" responded to by blowing kisses to the 23K on
    hand!
    
    One other note from the game - apparently Ted and Jane were in
    attendance.  Turner visited with the team before the game before
    heading for his owners box.  Then, with the Braves trailing 6-1
    they both left, only to miss probably the most stirring comeback
    of the whole season!  Haw haw haw!!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    
3.158FDCV06::KINGIf the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!!Fri Aug 02 1991 12:305
    Knorr.. as in Snorr... :-} Just kidding.. Sanders got the start because
    Gant drop his appeal for a 1 game suspension.... Gant figured he had
    better take the game now instead of waiting until September....
    
    REK
3.159Factual correction is necessaryRHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportFri Aug 02 1991 13:117
    Rong, REK.  Gant decided to take his 1-game suspension cause the Braves
    wanted to give Deion a start on his last game of the year.
    
    HTH,
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.160FDCV06::KINGIf the shoe fits... BUY IT!!!!!!!!!!!!Fri Aug 02 1991 13:183
    Isn't that what I said Snorr?????
    
    REK
3.161Knorr and T: Bandwagon BloodbrothersSHALOT::MEDVIDboys have wants, girls have needsMon Aug 05 1991 12:116
    What's this?  Chris Knorr suddenly an Atlanta Braves fan...now that
    they're winning?!?  Seems the same thing happened with a guy named Mr.T
    around the time a certain hockey team began winning.  You two do have
    something in common!!!
    
    	--dan'l
3.162Fair weather fans in Dixie ??? Yessiree ...SHALOT::HUNTPee Wee's Bogus Adventure ???Mon Aug 05 1991 14:5032
 My thoughts exactly, Dan'l ....
 
 Used to be you could have your very own personal *section* in
 Atlanta-Fulton County.    Just you and a hundred other empty seats
 around you.
 
 Now, it's oh-so-chic in Hotlanta to be a Braves fan.   Apparently,
 they're even doing some sort of new group cheering activity in
 Bravesville.   Called the "Tomahawk Chop" or something like that. 
 
 Seems as though, when cued by appropriate stereotyped tom-tom music,
 all the nouveau fans stand up and start making chop-chop motions with
 their right arms simulating a group scalping, I guess.
 
 Wonder how long it'll be before a Native American rights activist
 group gets the clever idea to spring a lawsuit claiming some sort of
 prejudicial harm done to their image.    Hmmm ???
 
 I guess it's better than The Wave, though.   Would have liked to have
 seen the one guy in the stands doing the Tomahawk Chop a few years
 ago.  Probably would have been arrested on suspicion of doing the
 Pee-Wee Thang.
 
 Atlanta is still the *ONLY* sports town in the country with at least
 three major league teams ... all of whom have *never* even played for
 a world championship title.    Perfect for Tar Heel fans !!!
 
 Bob Hunt
 
 P.S.  Atlanta's sports stock has jumped big time in the non-pro
 ranks, however.   Georgia Tech's 1/2 national title lasted year and
 the Olympics in 1996 are prime time accomplishments.
3.163Bandwagon jumper? Absolutely.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Aug 05 1991 14:5613
    I plead "GUILTY" to the charges of 'Braves Bandwagon Jumping', along
    with an estimated 2,000,000 other Atlanta residents.  In our defense
    I would only raise the issue of how hapless this franchise has been for
    so long.  Guess it took a Tar Heel fan (and our storied history of
    Consistent Excellence) to turn things around.
    
    (BTW Ketch, the equation with Carolina basketball with Atlanta based on
     the non-Title metric is wholly false and bogus, cause in 1982 Michael
     Jordan hit a baseline jumper to give UNC a victory over Georgetown
     in the NCAA Tournament finals.  HTH.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.164"Starvin' Marvin" Freeman for President!STAR::YANKOWSKASYou watch too much TV kidMon Aug 05 1991 15:329
    re Bob Hunt it's not just in Dixie, here in Southern NH/Northeastern MA
    I'm seeing a LOT more people wearing Braves' hats this year than in the
    recent past.
    
    (that being said the Braves are my favorite NL team, hope they can pull
    it off...)
                
    
    py
3.165MCIS1::DHAMELDude without a 'tudeMon Aug 05 1991 16:205
    
    The Boston Braves.  Yep, one of my favorite teams too.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.166RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceMon Aug 05 1991 18:5236
    Bob Hunt mentioned that attending Braves games is the "in" thing in
    Atlanta now. I don't dispute that but I would like to bring up a lousy
    situation in good old Boston.
    
    Going back only 4-5 years ago, one could almost assure themselves of a
    bleacher seat for any Red Sox game at the gate except versus the
    Yankees, on Opening Day or on Patriots' Day. Of course, during some
    late months, when the Sox were in the thick of a pennant race, seats
    became scarce.
    
    But now, it is quite unlikely to get a seat the day of the game at
    Fenway. Sure, much of the crowd are dedicated baseball fans who would
    support the team through thick and thin. But it's almost gotten to the
    point where those frustrated yuppies who couldn't get a Celtic season
    ticket now get a Red Sox season ticket. 
    
    And I wouldn't say Atlanta is alone in wagon jumping. Houston and
    Cleveland had huge crowds when the teams were winning. When the Yankees
    stumbled through the first 1/3 of the season this year, fans were hard
    to find - sans George even. Then the Yanks put together a respectable
    winning streak and fans returned.
    
    As far as the Braves go, I think they are somehow a darling of fans.
    When in Milwaukee they captured the imagination of the country as they
    dominated in the late 50's, dethroned the Yankees once and paraded a
    list of greats like Spahn, Matthews and Aaron before the public.
    
    Turner tried to label them America's team through TBS but that never
    worked. But they have their old uniforms back, have cultivated good
    talent through their farm system, made wise trades and hired a pretty
    good baseball mind in Bobby Cox. They lack that one charismatic person
    to put them into the national spotlight. Justice isn't that yet,
    Niether is Nixon or Glavine. But they are close......
    
    Rich
    
3.167It's the long haul that counts; not the high pointsSHALOT::HUNTRIP, Chris ShortMon Aug 05 1991 19:3430
 It's only natural for more fans to attend more games when the team is
 winning.   Nobody argues with that and it's one of the primary
 reasons why an owner would want the best team possible in the first
 place.
 
 What is arguable is the raw spread between low points and high
 points.   If the Red Sox have a great year, they pack all 33,000
 seats in Fenway.   Jam 'em in butt cheek to butt cheek.   If they
 sip, they draw, what, only 30,000 per game ???
 
 Same thing in Philly.   When the Phils do well, they pack in 35,000
 to 40,000 every single night.   If they do poorly, they draw 25,000
 to 30,000 every single night.   Fans in Philly are legendary for
 their preference for the Phils.   Back in 1981 or '82, I think, a
 Game 7 between the Sixers and the Bucks drew only 7,000 fans while
 more than 35,000 saw a Phillies-Cubs game across the street.
 
 You can say that about a lot of teams ... Toronto draws well, win or
 lose.  So do the Cubs.
 
 But when the Braves can have season after season full of games with,
 like, maybe 5,000 fans or less in the seats and then zoom up to over
 20,000 to 25,000 per night, then you've got bandwagon jumping.
 
 It's not evil or anything like that.  It's just not quite proper, as
 the English would say.   You've got to suffer in the bad times in
 order to earn real spurs as a true-blue fan.   Braves fans don't
 count yet.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.168But it'd be nice to see 'em win the west regardlessSHALOT::MEDVIDtime is eternalMon Aug 05 1991 19:5510
    Let's take what Bob Hunt said one step further.  Pittsburgh.  When
    Pittsburgh had the terrible teams between 81-88, Three Rivers was like
    a ghost town.  Yet, not a day went by when you didn't talk about what
    the Bucs did last night.
    
    In Atlanta, people didn't even give a darn about the Braves until this
    year.  Atlanta, as a city, is made up of bandwagon jumpers.  Don't
    believe me?  Ask the Falcons.
    
    	--dan'l
3.169BTW, the Tomahawk Cheer is cool! (Much better than The Wave)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Aug 05 1991 20:0119
    re: Atlanta (bandwagon town)
    
    I don't disagree with this.  I think the reason for it is two-fold:
    
    1. Atlanta is a very transient city.  People come.  People go.  In
       our subdivision if you've been here more than 2 years you're
       considered an old-timer.
    
    2. Atlanta sports teams have had a long, storied history of LOSING.
       Now it's true that the BoSox haven't won a Title since time
       immortal, but they always have a competitive product on the field.
       Not so for the Braves, Falcons, or Hawks.
    
    Additionally the south is very much into the college game, especially
    college football down here.  The papers are chalked-full of college
    football on a daily basis from now until January.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.170Please God, don't let Atlanta win the NL WestCELTIK::JACOBBeer,The Airplane Drink,Drink 1,P-38Mon Aug 05 1991 20:1116
    
             <<< Note 3.168 by SHALOT::MEDVID "time is eternal" >>>
            -< But it'd be nice to see 'em win the west regardless >-
               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    Dan'l,
    
        May I remind you that the Braves beat the living sh!t out of the
    Bucs this year.  The Bucs went 0-6 in Fulton County Stadium and 3-3 in
    3 Rivers vs the Braves.   Personally, I hope someone else wins the West
    'cause the Bucs will have a helluva time vs. the Braves cause the
    Braves seem to have the Pirates number this year.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.171Atlanta's Tomahawk Cheer: Mass Yuppie MasterbationSHALOT::MEDVIDtime is eternalMon Aug 05 1991 20:3927
>    1. Atlanta is a very transient city.  People come.  People go. 

    So why aren't they coming and going like they used to?  Nope, Atlanta
    reminds me very much of the Brie-eating, champagne-sipping yuppie
    Northstar fans...and you've joined their company, Chris.  

    You see, it's the thing to do.  "Let's go to a baaaaaaallgame, Muffy." 
    No one went to Falcons games until last year, but then it became the
    thing to do because Glanville came to town and changed the uniforms to
    a chic black base.  "Bravo.  Encore, old chap!  Pass the caviar for my
    Chic-Fil-A, Bifboy.  Thanks, you are a dear."

    And as soon as the Braves start losing again, you'll see the signs of
    old: "Go Braves...and take the Falcons with you!"

    Jake,

    You don't have to remind me of the Bucs skid in Hotlanta.  The best
    part about Atlanta winning the west would be the Bucs going back to
    Fulton County Stadium and womping their wigwam right there in front of
    their tomahawking fans...you know, the cheer they stole from Florida
    State.

    Let's see how much Knorr like that cheer when the Seminoles are beating
    the crap out of UNC every year.

    	--dan'l
3.172RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceTue Aug 06 1991 14:3620
    Interesting how some cities support teams maniacally while shunning
    other teams. 
    
    Take the Braves. In their last year in Boston I believe thier total
    attendance for the year was slightly over 200,000. While the Red Sox
    pulled in over 1,000,000. This just 3 years after the Braves won the NL
    pennant!
    
    Bob Hunt - do you recall the disparity between the Philadelphia
    Athletics and Phillies? And, in THAT case, the Athletics were the
    franchise with the most success, weren't they?
    
    Boston is wild about the Celtics, Red Sox and Bruins. Crowds are over
    85% of capacity regardless of how they do. Yet they only fill the
    stands in Foxboro if the Patriots are winning.
    
    Interesting.........
    
    Rich
    
3.174MAXWEL::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 06 1991 15:194
    The Patriots are relatively rookies in the New England sports scene. 
    Add to that their not so-impressive record and the grassroots following
    of the older Giants and they really don't have a strong base of loyal
    fans.
3.175Philly an NL city since 1883SHALOT::HUNTWho invented liquid soap and why ???Tue Aug 06 1991 15:2020
3.176CAM::WAYCall her up on the spank lineTue Aug 06 1991 15:2220
Well, I think a lot has to do with how the team is perceived by the
fans, not just how they're doing.

If the fans perceive ineptitude in the front office, then they tend to
discount the team.  While the Sox have ineptitude in the front office,
they have years and years of tradition and history (and some excellent
losses and almost theres) to offset the fans tendency to stay away.

The Patriots have a jackass in the front office, who's managed to put
his feet in his mouth a couple of times...


I like to look at the Whalers.  With no winning tradition, and with
sheer ineptitude running rampant in the front office, and continually
rising ticket prices, the fans are saying "Forget about it...."


These aren't the only factors though.....

'Saw
3.177Come on 1993!CSC32::GL_JOHNSONMandelaMarcusMalcolmMartinMarleyWed Aug 07 1991 02:4132
    re: fans
    
       It will be interesting to see how the many fans the Colorado
    Rockies draw in comparison to the Broncos, especially if and 
    when they become good enough to challange for the pennant.  
       
       The Broncos were Colorado's first ever major league sports 
    franchise and have consistenly sold out since '69, excluding 
    strike years.  Ever since the franchise beginnings they've had 
    a virtual monopoly on the Denver sports scene.  All the other 
    happenings, barely receive any notice.  Everyone breathes, eats, 
    drinks, and farts Broncos.  Granted, Denver isn't like Chicago or 
    Boston, larger cities that have long histories of great atheletes 
    and competitive teams.  But even in the relatively short period
    of time since 1960, some competitive teams and players have 
    passed through.  Like David Thompson, Dan Issel, Alex English, 
    the early/mid 70s CU Buffs, the '85 Air Force Football team.  
    Big deal.  To hear the fans and media tell it, the Broncos are 
    *it*. 	
                                                               
       CUs 1990 national championship season is the lone exception 
    thus far.  Even their glory is short-lived as another August 
    rolls around and the media camps out in Greeley and gives daily
    updates about the Broncos.
    
       I'd expect the Rockies(hope that name isn't a bad omen) to
    do well for their first 2 seasons.  Then the newness will wear
    off and we'll see what happens.
    
    
                                                 glen j.  
    
3.178SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 07 1991 12:563
    Glenn, you forgot to mention the several National Championships Air
    Force has rung up in Rugby.  Then again, by not mentioning it, you
    probably make your point even better.
3.179CAM::WAYCall her up on the spank lineWed Aug 07 1991 13:547
Mac, 

You and Glen both forgot to mention the National Club Champion Denver
Barbarians, for 1990....

Hope this helps,
'Saw
3.180The Rockies will FLYOURGNG::RIGGENJeff Riggen &quot;RSS&quot;Wed Aug 07 1991 16:408
Yo Glen you also forgot to mention that World Arena Football championship 
that the Denver Gold won in 88' 


I suspect that the Rockies will have big Draw every summer till about Mid-July
when they have been mathmatically eliminated from the rest of the Division. 

Kind like the Braves, Mariners, Cubs, Indians, White Sox....
3.181CSC32::J_HERNANDEZTheOrigionalKegOBeerMentalityWed Aug 07 1991 17:451
    I'll be there whenever the Dodgers are there!
3.182BSS::JCOTANCHWed Aug 07 1991 18:1612
    Hey Jeff, that was the Denver Dynamite that won the Arena Football
    championship a few years back.  Come on, don't you know you're Arena
    Football trivia? :^) :^)  The Denver Gold played in the USFL.
    
    It would be fairly safe to say the Rockies will draw 3 mil their first
    year.  There will be the obvious large crowds at the beginning, but
    there will be a 2nd stage of excitement in mid-'94 or '95 when the new
    stadium opens.  In their early years, I would think crowds will start
    to shrink in August & September when they're in or near last place and
    football season is starting up.
    
    Joe
3.183Don't want to sit upper deck outfield at Miami!SHALOT::MEDVIDtime is eternalWed Aug 07 1991 18:2411
    I was told last week that Florida (Miami) is going to play in Joe
    Rob-me Stadium.  Is this true?  If so, won't that be a sh!tty place to
    watch a game.  It's not like the cirular stadiums of Cinci, Philly,
    Pitt, etc.  It's a football stadium (big enough to play world class
    soccer on).
    
    Montreal played in an unmodified Olympic Stadium for several years and
    had no right field or center field seats.  It was like a cavernous
    tomb.
    
    	--dan'l
3.184I don't believe it.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Aug 07 1991 18:4617
    > It would be fairly safe to say the Rockies will draw 3 mil their
    > first year.
    
    Come back?  3,000,000 is an awful lot - that's an *average* of close
    to 37K per night!  Very few teams in baseball history have reached this
    lofty number.  (The Dodgers have done it alot and I think Toronto has
    also.)
    
    I was at a Nuggets game a few years ago and, despite a very competitive
    product (this was obviously before the Paul Westhaid fiasco) there were
    only around 8,000 bodies in the building.  Hopefully they'll support
    baseball better than hoops ...
    
    If the Rockies draw more than 2mil I'll be impressed ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.185NL pennant racesSHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youThu Aug 29 1991 13:114
3.186CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 29 1991 13:212
    Pittsburgh defeated LA.  Braves now have a full game lead on the
    Dodgers.
3.187finalCTHQ3::LEARYThu Aug 29 1991 13:238
    dan'l
    
    St.Louis 2 - Sand Diego 1
    Pittsburgh 6- LA 4
    
    MikeL
    Closet Bucs fan (when Sox sux)
    
3.188Who'da thunked it?SHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youThu Aug 29 1991 13:348
    Thanks for the responses.  Atlanta leads the west.  How about that.
    
>    St.Louis 2 - Sand Diego 1
    
    Are you sure this isn't reversed?  Someone just told me SD won and the
    Bucs are up 5 games in the east.
    
    	--dan'l
3.189whoopsCTHQ3::LEARYThu Aug 29 1991 13:424
    Pardonez-moi
    
    Twas SD 2, St. Loo 1. Sorry. Hurst wins 15th
    
3.190AXIS::ROBICHAUDSPORTS Goodfellows-Schneid,MrT,Jo*Thu Aug 29 1991 15:373
    	The Braves were always one of my favorite National League teams.
    
    				/Do*
3.191Anything can happenMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Aug 29 1991 16:553
    THe Braves who ??? Is this the Atlanta Braves....What were the odds
    against the braves to go to the World Series at the begining of the
    season...The Braves are better then the Redsox's..What a YEar
3.1922 UP!10881::DEVLIN_JOWill the Pernicious Gits Repeat?Fri Aug 30 1991 15:048
    YEah, and the Braves have all those pitchers like Glavine and Smoltz
    and Avery that Sox fans said weren't worth trading the likes of Mike
    GreenTeeth for....
    
    Terry Pendleton and Otis Nixon were fantastic pickups, and Sid Bream
    was activated yesterday (got 2 hits).   The Dodgers lost again...
    
    JD
3.193Brave New WorldAXIS::ROBICHAUDSPORTS Goodfellows-Schneid,MrT,Jo*Fri Aug 30 1991 15:425
    	What Red Sox fans are those JD?  The fictional ones you make
    up in your haid?  Darryl Strawberry better start worrying about
    the Braves now!
    
    				/Don
3.194Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop! (etc.)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Aug 30 1991 16:221
    
3.195RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOWill the Pernicious Gits Repeat?Fri Aug 30 1991 16:224
    Naw /Don - the clique in the Red Sox note.  Heck, most of 'em wouldn't
    trade Greenwell for Canseco and Rickey Henderson even up.
    
    JD
3.196CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Aug 30 1991 16:324
    At the time the rumors of Greenwell going to Atlanta were flying, the
    Braves pitching staff looked very sorry indeed.  It took them a couple
    of years to finally live up to their potential.  Who knows, the Braves
    may go the way of the Orioles of a couple of years ago.
3.197You're not going to get 100% agreement anywhere...GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Aug 30 1991 18:319
    
    > Naw /Don - the clique in the Red Sox note.  Heck, most of 'em wouldn't
    > trade Greenwell for Canseco and Rickey Henderson even up.
      
    Dream on, JD.  Greenwell has had his very vocal detractors for quite
    some time now...
    
    glenn
    
3.198RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOWill the Pernicious Gits Repeat?Fri Aug 30 1991 18:4611
    Glenn-
    
    Dream on yourself.   I've yet to see an intelligent trade discussion in
    that file.  Perhaps this year, finally, folks are thinking they could
    dump Mikey or Ellis - now that their worth is down.
    
    I knnow that no matter what I say, you'll say the opposite.
    
    The world is round.
    
    JD
3.199I repeat, you'll get 100% agreement *nowhere*GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Aug 30 1991 18:5918
    
    > Dream on yourself.   I've yet to see an intelligent trade discussion in
    > that file.
      
    Now this much I'll agree with.  Most of the trade suggestions are
    along the lines of dealing a Greenwell or a Burks for Vince Coleman
    or Gary Pettis, fercripessake!  Talk about overcompensation!
    
    > I knnow that no matter what I say, you'll say the opposite.
      
    No, I reject the notion that the world of Boston sports fans is
    a single-minded collection of know-nothings that can only be wrong
    because they don't agree with you.  If you have a point, make it.
    You don't have to insult the intelligence of anyone who happens
    to be a Boston Red Sox fan to do so...
    
    glenn
    
3.200RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOWill the Pernicious Gits Repeat?Fri Aug 30 1991 19:5026
    Glenn -
    
    Since I'm a Sox fan, I don't hold the views that *you* seem to think
    that I do.  There are a vast majority of boston fans who are
    knowledgeable - just as there are in every city/town/area I've ever
    lived in my life.  
    
    Of all the places I've been - and if you take *big* cities, that's New
    York, Boston, DC and Seattle, I found Boston fans to be the ones who
    over infalte the value of *themselves* and their players the most.
    
    Most of the trades are along the "Marty Barrett and a John Moses Card
    to Chicago for McDowell and Thomas" variety.
    
    Any time an intelligent trade is brought up - especially one that is
    *risky*, i.e. the Sox have to give up a 'prospect'  or a 'name', it is
    quickly shot down.
    
    You'll never get 100% agreement - no kidding!  You got the patent on
    that thought?   You seem to have a kneejerk reaction to defending the
    Sox and Boston whenever a criticism is brought forward.
    
    As I"ve always said "fans are fans are fans - doesn't matter where you
    are."
    
    JD
3.201Not a Bostoner, but still think they take a bad rap...GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Aug 30 1991 20:0413
    
    > You seem to have a kneejerk reaction to defending the
    > Sox and Boston whenever a criticism is brought forward.
      
    Which would be ironic because I'm not from Boston or New England
    originally, absolutely despised the Red Sox until around 1983-84,
    and am not much of a fan of any of the other Boston teams.  I guess
    your opinion of Boston fans comes from closer to the perspective of
    an original insider, and mine as an outsider.  Funny that we perceive
    the same things so differently, and from the opposite inclination...
    
    glenn
    
3.202RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOWill the Pernicious Gits Repeat?Fri Aug 30 1991 21:3727
    Glenn -
    
    But I'm not an original Bostoner nor New Englander.  Maybe because I
    went to school in Boston with a vast majority of New Englanders, all
    Boston fans, that have the views that I do.  
    
    Sox fans are a strange bunch.  The Sox are a frustrating team.
    
    I still think they need to scrap 'oldthink' - since it hasn't gotten
    them a title in years, and turn it around.  Maybe a St. Louis Cardinal
    Northeast is what is needed.  Would drive the fans nuts, but if they
    won, they'd love 'em.
    
    Of course, the Sox problems start with ownership - upper management has
    been a joke, and will continue to be one.  They always seem to be on
    the edge of a diving board - but afraid to dive in and get wet -
    because they want assurances that the water is perfect, that they have
    a towell to dry off with, etc.  Even when they make moves - like the
    free agent signing this winter, they seem paralized with fear to make a
    trade.  
    
    As for taking a bad rap - bostoner's take no worse a bad rap than folks
    from Detroit do, or New York, or Miami.  In fact, IMO, they get off
    easier.  Nationally, Boston's problems (busing notwithstanding), are
    kept fairly local, compared to other large cities.
    
    JD
3.203Glenn's right JD. Surrender now and save face.AXIS::ROBICHAUDThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBallsTue Sep 03 1991 14:192
    
    
3.204RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Sep 04 1991 19:296
    Went to see the Braves in Atlanta one week ago today. The night they
    climbed into a 1st place tie. Only 16,000 fans in the stands. What a
    disgrace!
    
    Rich
    
3.205AXIS::ROBICHAUDThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBallsWed Sep 04 1991 19:474
    	Yeah but Rich, I think that was the night they had to go head
    to head with the midget car racing finals or something.
    
    				/Don
3.206RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceWed Sep 04 1991 19:5718
    Kinda sad, really. They've got this kinda neat stadium that they will
    tear down in'96, an exciting baseball team that only sells out on
    weekends and Georgia Bulldog bumper stickers on most cars. I guess the
    priorities I am used to don't apply there.
    
    Could not believe it only cost $3.00 to park at Atlanta-Fulton County.
    The wife and kids met and shook hands with Homer the Brave. Bought
    tomahawks for the kids. 
    
    Nice to see so many ex-Richmond Braves on the big league roster. Brian
    Hunter, Keith Mitchell, Armando Reynoso and Mark Wohlers were all with
    the R-Braves in June/July. Then, it was nice to see other players I've
    seen in Richmond such as Treadway, Blauser, and Olson. However, the
    R-Braves have been picked clean. Worst record in the IL this year. Poor
    Phil Niekro had little left by the middle of August.
    
    Rich
    
3.207AXIS::ROBICHAUDThePatriots-ATeamWithALotOfBallsWed Sep 04 1991 20:057
    	Sounds to good to be true Rich.  First you ain't got to deal
    with DockerWearin', VolvoDrivin', PerrierDrinkin', BrieEatin' 
    IzodShirtWearin' yuppie eventgoers.  AND, you get to see real baseball
    not pseudo-softball like you get in the Almost League with lead-footed
    fatsos tryin' to hit homeruns every time at bat.
    
    				/Don
3.208BSS::G_MCINTOSHULTRIX NETWORKS, CSC/CSWed Sep 04 1991 23:136
    Doesn't Turner show all the Braves games on TV?  That may have
    something to do with low attendance at the games, plus the fact that
    Fulton County Stadium is downtown and the perimeter and interstate
    system is gridlock from 4pm till 7pm.
    
    Live from Charger Central.......Glenn
3.209Stadium better than the fans in itSHALOT::MEDVIDinbuilt guilt catches up with youThu Sep 05 1991 12:2811
    Fulton County Stadium has relatively easy access.  It is one of the
    nicest stadiums I've been in.  To tear it down and build another
    abomination (a.k.a. a dome) is a crime.
    
    And if you don't think that the majority of that crowd are yuppies,
    you're dead wrong.  They, like the Minissotans, have come out on the
    bandwagon and asking friends for good baseball books to read.  This
    after years of not so much as taking a passing glance at FCS during the
    summer months as they passed by in their BMWs.
    
    	--dan'l
3.210STAR::YANKOWSKASLithuania is free again!Thu Sep 05 1991 12:317
    re .208:
    
    About 130 of the Braves' 162 games are shown on WTBS; the remaining
    games are shown on the SportSouth cable channel.
    
    
    py
3.211RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Sep 05 1991 13:5630
    o Most Braves home games are on WTBS
    
    o Home games start at 7:40. Traffic on I-75/I-85 not gridlock after 6
    
    o Saw lots of Dockers in the stands and Jags in the parking lot
    
    o The "Chop/Chop" thing is really dependant on the organists whims
    
    o Atlanta Fulton County stadium is CLEAN and easy to get to.
    
    
    The decision was made, while I was there, to defintely tear the
    currenty stadium down. Olympic Stadium will be built, within the next
    few years, in the current parking lot adjacent to AFC stadium. The
    current stadium will be used for some events in 1996 and then it will
    be torn down. The Braves will then play in the new Olympic Stadium
    which will be modified somewhat. 
    
    The Georgia Dome and Olympic Stadium are not the same thing as I
    understand it. The Falcons will play in the Dome as will, most likely
    Georgia Tech.
    
    Of all the inner city stadiums I have been to, Atlanta Fulton County is
    the easiest to reach. Parking is ample and affordable. I guess the only
    thing I don't like about it (and this is based on my Fenway/Wrigley
    bias) is that if you put plastic grass down, it would look almost just
    like Bush Stadium. The place has no character.
    
    Rich
    
3.21229633::JCOTANCHThu Sep 05 1991 14:1310
    Another dome in pro football....a tragedy to the game.
    
    Yet another reason college football rools, the very low percentage of
    dome teams.  Houston, Syracuse, and Minnesota are the only ones that
    come to mind.
    
    Atlanta will make 7 dome teams out of 30 (after expansion), nearly a
    quarter of the league.  :^(
    
    Joe
3.213ACC Chris witnesses baseball history!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Sep 12 1991 12:217
    Broke into my daughters piggy bank yesterday so's I could head down to
    the (chop! chop!) Braves game last night.  (chop! chop!)  I was justly 
    rewarded, (chop! chop!) what with three (3) Atlanta hurlers (chop!
    chop!) tossing the first combined no-hitter in NL history! (chop!!!)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.214Was it an error or wasn't it?CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 12 1991 12:510
3.215SHALOT::MEDVIDhe starts to shake &amp; coughThu Sep 12 1991 13:006
    It looked like an infield hit to me.  You were there, Chris, so let us
    hear your point of view...and be objective.
    
    Why did they pull the starter if he was throwing a no hitter anyway?
    
    	--dan'l
3.216CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 12 1991 13:125
3.217Error in my book...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBrowardCountyPimpService,erPoliceThu Sep 12 1991 13:148
    I flet it wa an error.  In fact, its that type of 'hit' that is many
    times called a hit that pees me off about official scoring.  Pendleton
    had it the whole way, but I think he saw Belliard out of the corner of
    his eye and misplayed the ball.  Error in my book.  And the decision by
    the official scorer was quick - and he said he would have scored it an
    error if it was the first batter of the game, FWIW.
    
    jD
3.218RDOVAX::BRAKEA Question of BalanceThu Sep 12 1991 13:219
    re Taking ther starter out
    
    Merckur (sp?) has been a reliever nearly his whole career. The plan
    when he pitches is to get 5-6 good innings out of him.
    
    Why risk runing the guy for the year? 
    
    Rich
    
3.219Everything you wanted to know (and probably more...)RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Sep 12 1991 13:3028
    re: Why pull Mercker
    
    Rich is right.  He's a relief pitcher whose been called into service
    as a starter because of the Braves complete lack of a 5th man in the
    rotation.  No way was he ready to go 9 innings.
    
    
    re: the error
    
    To be honest, those watching on TV probably have a much better
    perspective on this than I do.  I was sitting out in the left field
    stands - not exactly right on top of the play!
    
    From the replays I've seen though as well as the comments made by the
    official scorer, I agree with JD.  The official reason he gave the
    error to Pendleton was because he started for the ball and then
    stopped.  This can be grounds for an error.  Earlier this year the
    same scorekeeper got a kudo from Sports Illustrated cause he gave an
    error to an outfielder who called for a short pop but then let it drop
    untouched cause of a communication breakdown with his shortstop.
    
    (BTW, the reason Pendleton stopped going for the ball is cause he lost
    it in the lights ...)
    
    Great game.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.220CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 12 1991 13:427
    When the no hitter was being reported on during the Sox broadcast last
    night they said that the no-no had been broken up by an IF hit.  They
    later reported that the ruling was changed and an error was given on
    the play.  Is this true?
    
    Most of the high choppers I've seen have been awarded IF hits since the
    scorer usually decides that the runner would have beat it out any way.
3.221Whoever reported it was a hit was wrong.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Sep 12 1991 13:519
    That reports was completely wrong Mac.  The scorer *IMMEDIATELY* ruled
    the play an error.  There was no hesitation, and there certainly was no
    changed call.
    
    In the paper this morning the scorer said he was so confident of his
    call that he didn't even bother to look at the replay.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.222AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHThu Sep 12 1991 14:474
    	'Twas a "Baltimore Chop" hit all the way.  What a homer (not
    Simpson) call.  One that should make a DeanDisciple proud.
    
    				/Don
3.223HitNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Sep 12 1991 15:4917
    
    Based on current, consistent (same standard as if there's not a
    no-hitter) official scoring practice, it's a hit all the way. 
    The ball was chopped very high, and Pendleton would have had to make 
    an exceptional play to even have a chance at throwing Jackson out, if
    he even had that much chance.  That's a hit 100% of the time if there's
    not a no-hitter going.
    
    And either way, of course the official scorer is going to make the
    error decision quickly and then back it up later.  I mean, if he rules
    a hit, he better be ready to flee the stadium being chased by 30,000
    tomahawk-wielding Braves fans.  When you're at the game like that,
    you're not going to be as objective as when you're at home watching on
    TV with the benefit of replay.  I wouldn't be, either.
    
    glenn
     
3.224CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Sep 12 1991 15:557
    Somewhere (notes, papers, ?) I read a suggestion that MLB add another
    umpire to each crew.  The extra umpire would serve as the official
    scorer.  Umps would rotate as they do now so that each member of the
    crew would have a turn in the field, behind the plate, and as the
    scorer.  It was suggested that this would provide consistency and help
    eliminate bias in the scoring.  It would also help get the good umps
    promoted from the minors.
3.225<sniff>PEACHS::MITCHAMAndy in AtlantaMon Sep 16 1991 20:2916
    Bad new for Braves fans -- Otis Nixon, league leader in stolen bases
    and lead off batter for the Braves starting line-up, has been suspended 
    for apparently failing a drug test.  No further details (ie. what the
    suspected drug is, etc.).
    
    What is curious (to me, maybe others will know better) is that drug
    tests are not mandated for Major League baseball players ('least that's
    what I understand).  Rather, they are given if volunteered or if a
    problem is obvious.  Certainly I don't know first hand Otis' case but
    it didn't -appear- he had a problem.  So, perhaps he approached someone
    regarding the issue.  I dunno... 
    
    Suspension is for 60-days which will extend the remainder of the
    regular season, the playoffs, and into next season (beginning today).
    
    -Andy
3.226shock..RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODid Gail finish? We want to KNOW!Mon Sep 16 1991 21:034
    Yowaza -  That might really hurt the Braves.  Who takes over left =--
    Lonnie SMith??
    
    JD
3.227PEACHS::MITCHAMAndy in AtlantaMon Sep 16 1991 22:4718
    In retrospect, Otis underwent drug rehab while playing for the
    Cleveland Indians (I believe) and may still be under some kinda drug
    rehab program.  If this is the case, it -is- possible he was submitted
    to a random drug test.  In fact, thinking back, it might have been
    about last Wednesday/Thursday -- I think he missed a home game against
    the Padres (no explanation given that I know of).  

    Rumors were flying about earlier on the 6:00 news as to if he can
    appeal or not -- one station said he might be able, another says
    definitely not.  Personally, I think he won't be able to but I'm no
    expert.

    Who'll take his place?  I don't think that's been ironed out yet but
    whoever it is definitely won't be as quick as Otis.

    Keep on choppin'...

    -Andy
3.228For you Braves fans out there...PEACHS::MITCHAMAndy in AtlantaWed Sep 25 1991 11:3514
- Cincinatti & Atlanta were rained out last night.  Will play a double header
  this afternoon (if the rain lets up).  Dodgers won last night (boo, hiss)
  which puts them up by 2 games.

- Deon Sanders was reactivated as a Brave (currently using Otis' locker).  He
  is expected to be used, at least, as pinch-runner.  Maybe more...  He -will-
  be playing for the Falcons this Sunday against the Saints.  This is the
  only time (that I know of) that a pro athelete has been activated to play 
  two different sports for two different teams at the same time (and in the
  same stadium, no less!).

- Keith Mitchell was arrested last night on DUI charges.

-Andy
3.229HELIX::TORRESWheel In The Sky Keeps On Turning...Mon Sep 30 1991 15:4112
    
    	What do you guys think of the trade between the Braves and Cubs? I
    think it is a little too late for a trade, specially for a pitcher that
    might not get a start and will be inelegible for post season...  The
    catcher might be of help...  Wasn't the catcher (can't remember his
    name) highly touted once...
    
    	If the Braves don't make it, it will not be for lack of desire...
    
    	Go Braves!
    
    LT
3.230 like itRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODial-a-POPE 1-900-8255463Mon Sep 30 1991 15:4312
    Good trade, I think.  Shows they want to win this year.  Bilecki might
    be a help from the bullpen - which has been hurting the Braves lately.
    
    
    Berryhill can spell Olsen for a game this week. He needs it.
    
    As for next year.  Bilecki can be the 5th starter, and Berryhill either
    the starter or platoon with Olsen.
    
    I like it.
    
    JD
3.231traded who?GRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Mon Sep 30 1991 16:143
    So just what was the trade... I still haven't seen all the players.
    
    Rick
3.232I'd have liked it better were it 2 weeks agoSTAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Mon Sep 30 1991 16:4910
    Trade was Berryhill and Bielecki for two prospects, can't remember who.
    
    Like the trade, but wonder if it's too little too late as far as this
    year goes.  Olson has been slumping in September, probably due to
    overuse, and the Braves sure could have used another arm yesterday with
    Pena unavailable.  (Have to wonder if Wohlers just plain not having it
    yesterday was also a result of being used often lately.)
    
    
    py
3.233btw, what's up with the BASEBALL notesfile?STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Mon Sep 30 1991 16:501
    
3.234CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Sep 30 1991 17:244
3.235thanks MacSTAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Mon Sep 30 1991 18:031
    
3.236HERIAM::CORBETTDo you think people will ever learn?Tue Oct 01 1991 10:238

RE: Baseball notesfile


	Hope to have it up later this afternoon.  

Tex
3.237AXIS::ROBICHAUDForAGoodTimeCall 1-800-8-RAHRAHTue Oct 01 1991 11:5615
	Well it looks like Bill White decided to reverse his suspension of 
the Nastiest Boy because it was in the "best interests of the pennant race". 
BullCookies!  It was in the best interest of the Los Angeles Dodgers!  Now 
while the blue crew are the benefactors of this decision I'm not sure that 
they originated it.  White did this because the fellows at CBS aren't to 
pleased with Minnesota and Toronto being in the ALCS and PittsburgH being one 
of the participants in the NLCS.  Nothing against the teams but the 
television markets are small and while the Braves have the potential to 
capture America's immagination like the '69 Mets did the backroom decision 
makers at CBS would rather a solid TV market team like the Dodgers be the 
other team in the NLCS.  This was a network decision that was pushed on 
baseball.  I never thought Bill White would prostitute himself like this.


				/Don
3.238Who's playing where when?SHALOT::MEDVIDTalk slowly; I'm hard of thinkingTue Oct 01 1991 11:594
    
    Anyone know the schedule for the NLCS and World Series?
    
    
3.239Bizarre leadership from White, to say the least...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 01 1991 12:1915
    
    Bill White has made some of strangest decisions this year I've ever
    seen.  Stuff like limited or *no* suspensions for obvious beanballs and
    large brawls, a fine but no suspension for Rob Dibble throwing at a
    baserunner "because he's been punished enough", an unprecedended *7*
    game suspension for Norm Charlton because he had the nerve to admit to
    an obvious beanball (hypocrisy at its worst from White), and now the
    startling conclusion that games involving the Reds in September *really
    are* more important than games involving the Reds in June, even though
    the rules don't change according to schedule (and even though the Reds 
    are out of it now!)
    
    glenn
     
    
3.240The whole world bleeds Dodger Blue, right?RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueTue Oct 01 1991 12:4010
    Boy /Don, that note looked almost cynical enough to be one_a mine!  (Or
    even MorT's ...)
    
    No doubt you're right - the boys at CBS are pulling for the Dodgers
    big-time.  Wonder if White was on the line to Roger Craig the other
    night, instructing him to leave Righetti in while he was serving nothing 
    but BP to the Dodgers ....
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.241Hrumph...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOIs Paris Burning?Tue Oct 01 1991 12:4318
    Ha.  Big deal.  I've felt that baseball's 'rulers' have been full of
    doo-doo for years.  the phrase "The Integrity of the Game" makes me
    laugh whenever I hear it.  It was at its worst under that pompous ass
    Bart Giamatti, and the league presidents and the commish are full of
    it.
    
    How come Don ZImmer hasn't been crucified in public yet?  How come Don
    Zimmer hasn't been proven guilty before due process - like a certain
    ex-Cincy Red was?
    
    Why this move by White?
    
    Baseball is hurting on TV, that's why.  CBS has lost millions on the
    contract, and caint stand the prospect of a Pittsburgh-Toronto world
    series.  They'll go nuts.  The want L.A. and Tommy Pasta and Darryl
    Burrberry and Mike Sciatia there.  
    
    JD
3.242CAM::WAYThank you, Thank you, Sam I amTue Oct 01 1991 12:4911
If an investigative reporter, like the kind that prowls around Capitol Hill
ever got the key to Baseball's Closet, so many skeletons would fall it
it would like like a biology lab on "Put the Cat Skeleton Together Day".

There'd be so much dirt in there that MLB would be forced to induct
Shoeless Joe into the HoF post haste.

Can you say Hypocrites?  Sure, I knew you could.....


'Saw
3.243It's now ba$eballTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPTue Oct 01 1991 15:229
The ultimate ruler of MLB, like all sports is not Bill White, Faye Vincent or
Bart Giamatti's ghost, but the almighty $.  i don't beleive this was always the
case, Judge Landis took no s*it from anyone, he was simply a hateful and 
predudice man.

The past several years, money has made the baseball go round.  I even question
the outcome of the playoffs and series.

=Bob=
3.244CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Oct 01 1991 15:305
    There is some kind of discombobulated logic to this whole thing.  The
    original offense was committed against the Dodgers.  To suspend the guy
    now with the Reds playing the Braves could be viewed as penalizing the
    Dodgers.  Then again, you'd have to subscribe to the theory that
    September/October games are worth more than June games...
3.245GENRAL::WADETue Oct 01 1991 16:1424
    
    	White put three days of Charlton's suspension on hold 
    	until after the three game series with the Braves.
    
    From the local rag:
    
    	"With the close pennant race in the Western Division, it	
    	is imperative that all teams play with their full complement
    	of players in order to guarantee that the competition is 
    	fair and balanced," White said.
    
    	White handed down the suspension one week after the incident
    	at the beginning of a 2 game series with LA.  Charlton
    	appealed, putting the suspension on hold.  He dropped the 
    	appeal Sunday with one week left in the season so it would
    	not carry over to next season.
    
    	"I don't really understand it," Charlton said.  "There's
    	this thing called the integrity of the game that Pete
    	Rose got kicked out for.  They said Pete Rose might ruin the
    	integrity of the game.  Yet Bill White suspends me against
    	LA.  I drop the appeal, and he make me play against Atlanta."
    
    Claybroon
3.246Did White ever play left field ???SHALOT::HUNTTed, that's the prom queen !!!Wed Oct 02 1991 11:4320
 This Bill White-Norm Charlton thing is truly bizarre.    
 
 Not only does White concede, through his decision, that late season
 games are more important than early or mid-season games.    Not only
 does he directly influence the pennant race in favor of the Dodgers.
 
 But he also jeopardizes the Reds' chances for *NEXT* season.  
 Charlton was suspended for 7 games for admitting that he threw at
 Mike Scoscia and now that White has allowed him to play these three
 Braves games, Charlton will not be able to finish his suspension this
 year.
 
 He'll have to sit out two games of the 1992 season.   White better
 hope the Reds either win the division or lose it by more than 2 games
 because if they lose it by 1 or 2 games, they have every reason to be
 damn angry.
 
 White is doing 'shrooms big time.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.2478^)CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodWed Oct 02 1991 11:525
> White is doing 'shrooms big time.
 
Just so the record is clear on this, he *didn't* get them from me!

'Saw
3.248GENRAL::WADEWed Oct 02 1991 12:5621
    
    Bob,
    
    	Let me qualify this by stating that I am a big Reds
    	fan.  Now that we've established that........
    
    	I think Charlton timed this whole thing on purpose.
    	He immediately appealed in time to face the Dodgers.
    	He then gave up the appeal in time to not face the
    	Braves.
    
    	It's common knowledge he HATES the Dodgers (Charlton	
    	that is).
    
    	This is, of course, my opinion.  
    
    	I just might be searching for a new team after all the 
    	bush antics the Reds have been pulling.  Hey!  Isn't
    	Denver getting a team? ;^)
    
    	Claybroon
3.249RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueWed Oct 02 1991 16:1517
    Excellent point, Bob-man.  
    
    The Braves pulled off a most-improbable "W" over the Reds lasted night. 
    Down 6-zip after 1 inning, the Reds have Rijo on the mound, ... and
    they pull off the 7-6 win.  Unreal.  
    
    
    re: Wade
    
    I'm a Reds fan too and you very well may be right, but the theory is
    sheer conjecture and certainly could not be used by White to base his
    decision.  Charlton says he wants to get his suspension
    outa the way so he'd be ready for next year, and that's perfectly
    reasonable explanation.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.250Dodgers don't need White's helping handSHALOT::HUNTTed, that's the prom queen !!!Wed Oct 02 1991 17:0014
 And two of the Braves runs came off Charlton so perhaps "Justice" is
 being served after all.
 
 Regardless, that still doesn't relieve White from a bonehaid
 decision.  And, furthermore, consider this ...
 
 Bill White based his decision to suspend Charlton's suspension for
 the Braves series because he said he wanted to make sure the pennant
 race competition was as fair as possible and that all the teams
 involved had all their players at hand.
 
 Wonder what Otis Nixon thought of that ???
 
 Bob Hunt
3.251CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 02 1991 17:217
3.252League suspected Nixon, then nails him in pennant race :^(RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Oct 02 1991 17:4021
    re: Otis Nixon
    
    The timing of the Nixon suspension definitely feeds my cynical
    appetite.  Consider that he apparently tested positive way back in
    July, but for some reason or other the league never notified the
    Braves or Nixon.  Apparently there was some question as to the validity
    of his showing up positive (to Cocaine).  Then in the heart of a fierce
    pennant race he gets retested and (surprise!) turns up positive.  What
    a shock it musta been to the league, huh?
    
    I realize it's tough to have sympathy for Otis given that he's
    admitted his guilt, but consider that since his initial coke problem
    in 1987 he's been tested over **TWO HUNDRED** (200) times!  *If* the
    league had noticed the Braves of the questionable test back in July
    there's a halfway decent chance he woulda stayed clean at least through
    the rest of the season.
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
    
3.253Naw, no conspiracy here, but maybe an attempted cover-upNAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1991 18:1420
    > *If* the
    > league had noticed the Braves of the questionable test back in July
    > there's a halfway decent chance he woulda stayed clean at least through
    > the rest of the season.                                     
    
    If I'm not mistaken, the Braves and Nixon were fully aware of his 
    marginal positive test.  It would have been kind of hard for them not 
    to be, since Nixon flew to New York to meet with the commissioner to 
    discuss the problem.  ;-)
    
    I don't think the Braves really have a beef on the Nixon suspension. 
    If anything, Vincent let him slide in the "best interests of baseball",
    which can most succinctly be expressed as "whatever keeps our good name
    out of the mud".  The rest of the league could make the argument that
    Vincent was obligated to suspend Nixon the first time, as he was
    technically in violation of his aftercare treatment agreement.
    
    glenn
    
3.254RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Oct 02 1991 18:319
    re: .-1
    
    According to the Braves GM, John Scherhoff (sp), he was never notified
    of the failed drug test.  I believe Nixon had to go to NY because of
    his run-in with a Phillies pitcher who beaned him.  (Otis went after
    him wif his bat.)
    
    
    Chris
3.255NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 02 1991 18:4113
                                                 
    > According to the Braves GM, John Scherhoff (sp), he was never notified
    > of the failed drug test.  I believe Nixon had to go to NY because of
    > his run-in with a Phillies pitcher who beaned him.  (Otis went after
    > him wif his bat.)
    
    Okay, that sounds reasonable.  But Nixon definitely knew of the test, 
    and he still stuck his nose back in the bag.  And even if he hadn't 
    known, he still had to know that he was acting in violation of league
    policy and susceptible at any time to getting caught.  No excuses...
    
    glenn
    
3.256Maybe yes, maybe no.RHETT::KNORRGraphics Workstation SupportWed Oct 02 1991 18:538
    > No excuses
    
    As I said, difficult to argue with this, but I'll always be curious if
    Nixon played for, say, the LA Dodgers, if the same events would've
    transpired ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.257**OFFICIAL NLCS NOTE**CELTIK::JACOBYou Trying to make ME sick????Wed Oct 02 1991 21:524
    This'll be the official note to discuss the NLCS!!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.258RAVEN1::B_ADAMSQueen city will be his last stand!Wed Oct 02 1991 23:578
    
    	Are we making predictions? If so, I'll take the Dodgers to go with
    the Pirates.
    
    	Go big Blue!
    
    B.A._if_not_then_delete_this_note_
    
3.259CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 03 1991 12:362
    Since we already have a topic to discuss the National League, I see no
    reason why the NLCS can't be discussed here.
3.260AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoc Flutie?Thu Oct 03 1991 12:406
	I was listening to Sports on W-eee-eee-I this morning and they had 
one of the Dodger players whining about how the Reds laid down for the 
Braves because they were pulling for Atlanta to beat Los Angeles.  What a 
pathetic bunch of crybabies.  All the more reason to root for my Braves!

		/Don(making tomohawk motions as I type this)
3.261REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Reggie Dupard?Thu Oct 03 1991 12:463
    Uh-oh... when does Farley call him a dirty name again?
    
    Dodgers bleed weenie blue...
3.262Terrific pennant race ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 03 1991 12:4616
    re: .-1
    
    Boo hoo!1  Those poor Dodgers ...  BOO HOO!!!!!!! 
    
    Blah.  Guess they forgot about the fact that the same Reds "layed down"
    for the Dodgers a week or two ago, getting swept in LA!
    
    Anyway, after ONE HUNDERED AND FIFTY-NINE (159) games, the Dodgers
    and Braves are in a dead heat.  Advantage has to go to Atlanta right
    now, with three (3) home games against the Astros, while LA travels to
    San Francisco to face a mean Giants team.
    
    Chop!  Chop!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.263Spoken words are fleeting, written ones are proof!!!!CST17::FARLEYThe Man with 1,000 ID'sThu Oct 03 1991 12:5920
SEE?????  Just like I been sayin.....
    
    
    Most excellent, wise, thoughtful and profound bit of fair-handed
    
    moderator authority *I've* ever seen!   WAY TO GO! your exalted
    
    moderatorness!!!!!!

    ;^)
    
           <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 3.259               The National League (Baseball)               259 of 262
CHIEFF::MACNEAL "ruck `n' roll"                       2 lines   3-OCT-1991 10:36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Since we already have a topic to discuss the National League, I see no
    reason why the NLCS can't be discussed here.

3.264CONME BACK!! PLEASE?????? CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Thu Oct 03 1991 13:175
Bring the Braves back to Boston where they belong!!!!!!!!!
For cripes sake!

8^)
3.265Can they keep it going ???SHALOT::HUNTTed, that's the prom queen !!!Thu Oct 03 1991 13:1817
 Yes, the Braves do have the advantage of playing the lasted three at home
 against lasted-place Houston while the Dodgers have to visit the Stick,
 the traditional house of horrors.
 
 But the Braves also have the pressure of trying to build on a current
 six-game win streak.  It's very very hard to win 9 major league baseball
 games in a row.
 
 If the Braves do win 9 in a row to end the season, they deserve the flag.  
 If the Dodgers sweep the Giants and the Braves then win their 10th in a
 row in Game 163 in LA, then the Braves deserve a parade down Peachtree
 Street.
 
 Must be a new feeling for you, Soup.  You know, rooting for an
 overachieving gotta-love-'em underdog.   Keep up the good work.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.266CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodThu Oct 03 1991 13:2810
I'd like to see the Braves do it, if only for the fact that it's someone
DIFFERENT.

I love underdogs.  Underdogs are the American Way of Life.  Overcoming
tremendous odds to win everything...  It's an orgiastic feeling that
pervades the heart of every American....


jmho,
'Saw
3.267And I like Sid Coffee and BreamRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOIn Harm's WayThu Oct 03 1991 13:368
    The only problem with the Braves winning is you have all these
    new-fangled yuppie style, tomahawking bandwagon fans like Soup
    strutting their chests.
    
    However, I'd like to see 'em win only because I caints stand Tommy
    Pasta or Darryl Burrberry.
    
    JD
3.268FDCV07::KINGCan't think of anything clever.......Thu Oct 03 1991 13:374
    Who really gives a sh*t who wins the west... The "winner" will lose
    4 straight to the Pirates anyway....
    
    REK
3.269HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Oct 03 1991 14:192
    Rick, that's what everyone said about the As last year too.
                                      Denny
3.270Pirates over hated Dodgers would be nice, too...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 03 1991 14:5415
    > The only problem with the Braves winning is you have all these
    > new-fangled yuppie style, tomahawking bandwagon fans like Soup
    > strutting their chests.
    
    This is what I was saying, in favor of the Dodgers, until Tommy Lasorda 
    emerged as a first-rate crybaby down the stretch.  Now I can't think of 
    anything sweeter than the Giants (who I prefer to either team) sticking 
    it to their hated rivals this weekend in Candlestick. 
    
    Still, the Buccos are the only ones left to really hold my interest in 
    the postseason...
    
    glenn
    
3.271REFINE::ASHEWhat happened to Reggie Dupard?Thu Oct 03 1991 15:254
    Yeah, but JD, how can you not root for a city that has radio stations
    giving away tix when the listeners hear a slurping sound and call in
    to say "Tommy Lasorda sucks Slim-Fast"?
    
3.272STAR::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Thu Oct 03 1991 15:4014
    > The only problem with the Braves winning is you have all these
    > new-fangled yuppie style, tomahawking bandwagon fans like Soup
    > strutting their chests.
    
    Perhaps, but for every such wagon hopper there's a fan like the author
    of .229 (who I remember from the old Braves' notesfile), who's stood by
    the Braves through what were frankly some rotten seasons in the
    mid/late 80s. For those people, you can't help but be happy.
    
    And Glenn Geiger, wherever he may be right now, is surely smilng too.
    
    
    py
                                                               
3.273RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOIn Harm's WayThu Oct 03 1991 15:4911
    Pau. Walt, et al -
    
    Hey, I know that.  Heck, I want the Braves to do it just cuz they kinda
    remind me of the 69 Mets.  I was just making a cut at Soup, who I don't
    remember showing any interest in baseball over the last years.
    
    And yes, I'm sure Glenn Geiger is smiling, wherever he is.  I met him
    in CXO, and he was a super guy.  And heck, Paul, Glenn and I had by far
    the worst DNR teams ;-)
    
    JD
3.2742 kids, no money. Definitely not a yuppie.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 03 1991 15:5511
    No interest in America's Pastime, JD????  Where were *you* when I
    boldly predicted a Cincinnati 'W' in the playoffs (after Nazzaro's 
    pre-playoff statement that he thought the Pirates would give the A's a
    nice battle) as well as a Cincinnati 'W' in the WS???
    
    I WILL confess to being a Braves bandwagon jumper.  No way around that. 
    But if you saw the car I was drivin', you'd drop that 'yuppie' label
    but_quick.  :^(
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.275Are T and Crisp the same person?CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 03 1991 16:151
    ACChis is to baseball as MrT is to hockey.
3.276CAM::WAYJack Daniels and RedMan - SOME goodThu Oct 03 1991 16:346
JD,

If all you had to root for was a team that wore the prettiest shade
of baby blue, and who achieve excellence during the recruiting season
and regular season, but then who continually choked on Beechnut Strained
Peas in the Big Dance, wouldn't YOU jump on a bandwagon too?  8^)
3.277CELTIK::JACOBYou Trying to make ME sick????Thu Oct 03 1991 16:4617
    I think that the Bucs will beat hooever they play from the west, BUT,
    and that's a huge plate-stacker style BUT, I hope they don't go to
    sleep the way they did lasted year .vs. the Reds.
    
    Drabek has been scheduled to start the NLCS opener nexted wednesday.
    
    Hopefully, Bonds won't go 0 fer NLCS the way he did lasted year, too.
    What got me was he blasted Jeff King for not playing but he suyre
    didn't do anything to prove that he was on the field, either.
    
    Bonds made a pretty big turnaround this year, though, I must admit.
    After batting about .190 thru the end of May, he has played good ever
    since.  
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.278T and Soup vastly different on this scoreSHALOT::HUNTTed, that's the prom queen !!!Thu Oct 03 1991 16:4823
 Yeah, but Soup's bandwagon ride is a little easier to swallow than
 T's illegitmate ride on the North Stars chariot.
 
 I mean the No Stars got into the NHL's worthless playoff system with
 a losing record, fer cripes sake.   And it took an upset win or two
 or three or more before T decided he'd "discovered" ice hockey.   Did
 we hear any manly admissions about how losing teams didn't deserve a
 shot at the Cup ???   Oh, no, all we heard was "miracle this" and "on
 a roll that" and so on and so forth ???   You'd have thought the
 sport was invented in Minnesota, fer cryin' out loud.
 
 At least Soup hopped on the wagon of a team that has to truly earn
 its post-season berth.
 
 But he did succumb to the Tomahawk Chop silliness so he's not
 completely blameless in all this.   He needs to step forward *now*
 and denounce the Chop as an over-hyped media symbol of a one-time
 only bandwagon filled to overflowing with sunshine warriors.   Not
 only that ... he should reject the clearly racist implications behind
 the unfortunate gesture.    Factual intellectual honesty demands that
 he do this *NOW* !!!
 
 Bob Hunt
3.279Chop! Chop! Chop! Chop!!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 03 1991 17:031
    
3.280AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopThu Oct 03 1991 18:2618
			    ACC Heelbilly
	(sung to the theme song from the Beverley Hillbillies)

	Come and listen to my story 'bout a man named Cyst,
	A poor Tar Heel fan makin' tommy chops wif' his fist.

	And then one day he started rootin' for the Braves,
	When the good folks of SPORTS started callin him a knave.

	Yuppie that is.  Bandwagon jumper.

	Well the first thing you know ol' Cyst's a baseball main,
	The SPORTS folks said "Cyst cut out whilst you cain".

	They said "'Snuffy and the Heels are the only team you luv",
	"So take your Excellent Losses outta here or we'll give you a shove".

	Tossed off the bandwagon.  Jilted.
3.281RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOVon Ryan's ExpressFri Oct 04 1991 13:195
    /DON -
    
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA(TM)
    
    JD
3.282From USA TODAY...RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOVon Ryan's ExpressFri Oct 04 1991 13:2554
    From USA Today:
    
    From the home office in Tijuana, the top 10 reasons why no one outside
    of Los Angeles is rooting for the Dodgers to outlast the Braves on this
    final weekend:
    
    
    
    10.  Atlanta's tomahawk chop is our best hope for getting rid of the
    wave.
    
    
    
    9.  If the Dodgers win, there will be no escaping Tommy LaSorda's
    Slim-fast commercials.
    
    
    
    8.  Jane Fonda needs the TV time, and Ted Turner will see that she gets
    it.
    
    
    
    7. We've gone this long without seeing Eddie Murray smile.  WHy change
    now?
    
    
    
    6.  Some of us still have a grudge about Al  Campanis' theories on
    buoyancy.
    
    
    5.  We used up the last of the smog and sushi jokes during the
    Bulls/Lakers series.
    
    
    
    4.  Atlanta gives you Justice.  LA gives you gas  wiht the pitching duo
    of Orel and Belcher.
    
    
    
    3.  For a town that has never hosted a sporting event of consequence,
    Atlanta could use some practice before the 1996 Olympics.
    
    
    
    2.  In all of sports, is there any phrase that rolls off the tongue
    more easily than "Beat LA"?
    
    
    1. and the Number ONE reason the world is rooting against the
    Dodgers...If the playoffs are in Atlanta, we'll be three time zones
    away from Sonny Bono's Senate Campaign.
3.283CSC32::SALZERFri Oct 04 1991 18:293
    What is the tie breaker for homefield if the season ends tied?
    Coin flip?
    head to head record?
3.284CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 04 1991 18:315
3.285LA won the coin flip. :^(RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Oct 04 1991 18:321
    
3.286CHIEFF::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 04 1991 18:404
3.287GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreSun Oct 06 1991 19:092
    The Coin flip didn't matter!!!
    
3.288HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Mon Oct 07 1991 10:284
       Strawberry says the teams that played da Braves down the stretch
    didn't care about winning. Of course he also said all the teams that
    the Blew played were out to get them.
                                          Denny
3.289Strawberry whineSTAR::YANKOWSKASThis was a season to remember?Mon Oct 07 1991 11:0210
    re .288:
    
    The same Daaarrryyll who went 1 for 8 in Friday's and Saturday's games.
    
    The Dodgers didn't lose it down the stretch.  They lost it by not
    putting Atlanta away back in July, when the Braves were 9-1/2 back and
    Justice and Bream were just starting DL stints.
    
    
    py
3.290RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Great EscapeMon Oct 07 1991 12:278
    I loved it when Darryl whined.  When he was up in the 9th, man on, down
    by two - I told my wife - Darryl will stike out.  He did.  Somethings
    never change.
    
    Braves were 55-28 after the all-star break - best in baseball.  Folks
    are handing the Pirates the Pennant already.  I don't think so...
    
    JD
3.291Atlanta has gone wacko ...RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 07 1991 12:4123
    > Folks are handing the Pirates the Pennant already.  I don't think
    > so...
    
    Agreed, JD.  The amazing thing to me is that any Pirates fan could
    actually be confident heading into this series.  Consider:
    
    o Atlanta had the best record in baseball the 2nd half
    o Atlanta won the season series 9-3 against Pittsburgh
    o The Pirates supposedly are susceptible to lefties, and the
      Braves figure to throw a couple of tough ones at them
    
    I'm not so sure Atlanta will win.  The Pirates have an experience edge,
    especially in pitching, which I think is significant.  I also tend to
    minimize the Braves hot play down the stretch, cause of Dean's theory
    about tournaments.  (You build momentum IN the tourney, not prior ...)
    
    But the fact remains that Vegas' making Pittsburgh a prohibitive
    favorite would leave me salivating, assuming I was a gambler.  (Which,
    BTW, I'm not.)
    
    
    - ACC Chris
    
3.292CELTIK::JACOBkweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbweMon Oct 07 1991 12:4410
    
    >>o The Pirates supposedly are susceptible to lefties, and the
    >>  Braves figure to throw a couple of tough ones at them
    
    ESPN had a graphic yesterday showing the BUcs had the best record in
    the NL .vs. lefties.    Something like 34-16 against left handed
    starters.  Is that being susceptible??????
    
    JaKe
    
3.293Real (unsupportive) fans vs. Yuppie TomahawkersSHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneMon Oct 07 1991 12:5326
    As a Pirates fan, the Braves certainly scare me.  But I'd much rather
    be playing them than the Dodgers.  A few points:
    
    - The Bucs do have an experience edge, but two of 90's Pirates,
    Belliard and Bream, are now playing for Atlanta.  And Terry Pendleton
    adds lots of post-season play experience and leadership.
    
    - Bream will be cheered in Pittsburgh again.  Belliard will be booed.
    
    - The Pittsburgh weather might play a factor.  It's getting cold up
    there.
    
    - One, two, or all three of the Pittsburgh outfielders will be too hot
    to touch.  My guess is Bonilla.  VanSlyke will struggle against the
    lefties; perhaps unstoppable against the righties.
    
    - The Braves might be living high right now and celebrating winning the
    division a bit too much.  They might have a bad attitude of, "Well,
    even if we lose the playoffs, we had a great season."  The Pirates are,
    on the other hand, looking to avenge their horrid October 1990.
    
    - I just think it would be great for Pittsburgh to beat the Minessotta
    Yuppies twice in one year in two major sports.  They have to get past
    the Atlanta Volvos first.
    
    	--dan'l
3.294RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 07 1991 12:536
    Interesting, Jake.  I forget where I heard the lefty thing ...
    
    Haven't read the paper today, but I'd guess the Braves 3-man rotation
    will be either Glavine-Smoltz-Avery, or Glavine-Avery-Smoltz.  Anybody
    hear?  Also, who do the Pirates figure to being throwing ...
    
3.295more...SHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneMon Oct 07 1991 13:0818
>Also, who do the Pirates figure to being throwing ...
    
    I would think the Pirates rotation will be
    
    	Drabek
    	Smiley
    	Smith
    
    That would put Tomlin in the bullpen for strong middle relief...if
    needed.
    
    And I'll go out on a limb here for the hell of it:
    
    	Pirates win pennant in five games, Garry Redus MVP
    
    How's that for brash?
    
    	--dan'l
3.296HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Mon Oct 07 1991 13:102
       What I wanna know is: are the Bucs as unstoppable as the '90 As?
                                          Denny
3.297BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 07 1991 13:154
    If the Braves and Twins can go from worst to first in one year, nothing
    says the Rockies can't win the NL West in '93.  :^)
    
    Joe
3.298Coming from a Dodger fan.CSC32::J_HERNANDEZTired of it.Mon Oct 07 1991 14:071
    Congrats to da Braves. I hope they kick PIttsburgh's ass.
3.299/Chop.../Chop.../Chop.../Chop... Braves in 7.AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopMon Oct 07 1991 14:291
    
3.300CELTIK::JACOBkweoihwensodnfwefoiwefouinbweMon Oct 07 1991 15:068
    The Tomahawk Chop is not an Atlanta original, they stole it from
    
    PeeWee Herman's Florida Theater motion!!!
    
    (8^)*    (8^0*
    
    JaKe
    
3.301inbreeding --> green-teefANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYFrom MattSewell to MikeSewellMon Oct 07 1991 15:245
    Hey, you guys see the picture of that Braves fan in today's USA 
    Today?  Sorta reminds me of that guy in David Lynch's "Wild At
    Heart."  Haa.
    
    MrT
3.302controversial kinda guyHBAHBA::HAASMental ModelMon Oct 07 1991 15:348
William Dafoe is the guy from Wild at Heart. Truly nice teeth. Ends up
blowing his own head off but has very memorable seen with Laura Dern. One
can only wonder if the Braves fan suffers similar ignominy.

FWIW, Dafoe made a mark with his portrayal of the title role in "Last
Temptation of Jesus Christ".

TTom
3.303One of my faves. He and Mickey Rourke should team upSHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneMon Oct 07 1991 15:389
    Willem Dafoe:
    
    Streets of Fire
    To Live and Die in LA (played a most excellent bad guy)
    Platoon
    (some other Vietnam movie with Gregory Hines and Fred Ward)
    Last Temptation of Jesus Christ
    Wild at Heart
    
3.305I've always been a closet Braves fanAXIS::ROBICHAUDRussMeyers-UnappreciatedGeniusMon Oct 07 1991 16:291
    
3.306CELTIK::JACOBDIHMon Oct 07 1991 16:308
    
    >>How did LA not win the NL West?
    
    The whole team choked on one of Tommy Lasordid's Ultra-Slim Fascist
    cartons!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.307CELTIK::JACOBDIHMon Oct 07 1991 16:3112
    
    >> <<< Note 3.305 by AXIS::ROBICHAUD "RussMeyers-UnappreciatedGenius" >>>
    >>               -< I've always been a closet Braves fan >-
    
    
    Right, but you're still in the closet on some things, right
    slasher??????
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.308Slasher's in the closet doin' the tomahawk chop!SHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneMon Oct 07 1991 16:341
    
3.309CAM::WAYWith Malice Toward NoneMon Oct 07 1991 16:5023
Read in an article not long after his stunning performance in Platoon
(all the performances in that movie were GREAT), but anyway,
Willem Dafoe's REAL name is William.

When he was a kid a baby brother or someone couldn't pronounce William
and it came out Willem.  It was kind of a nickname that stuck, and
he's used it as a stage name since he got into acting.

Some of his friends were so taken by his "death" in Platoon that they
called him to see if he was okay.



Now, as to /Don in the closet, the only thang he doing in there is
desensitizing his filberts for the Olympics, so that if dInz *does*
tickle him there, it won't blow their routine.


Finally, I'm glad Atlanta won.  It's nice to see someone different
in there for a change....


'Saw
3.310AXIS::ROBICHAUDRussMeyers-UnappreciatedGeniusMon Oct 07 1991 17:055
    	Be nice boys, otherwise when the Braves beat the Pirates we
    won't let you on this wagon.  We've already thrown Faux and his
    Excellent Losses off.
    
    				/Don
3.311CSC32::J_HERNANDEZTired of it.Mon Oct 07 1991 18:012
    Dafoe was not a nice man in To Live And Die In L.A. He did have some
    huge ganos though. 
3.312On PittsburghANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYFrom MattSewell to MikeSewellTue Oct 08 1991 14:3410
    Big question now is...
    
    Cain the Pirates actually sell out their NCLS games?  If not, maybe
    they cain bring in that stupid-assed Elvis impersonator and Ulf-the-
    Underhanded to perk things up a bit to attract more attendees by 
    working the stands.  If that won't work, I suggest Fay pick up the
    tix and T&L and bus in several thousand real baseball fans from 
    Cincinnati to make for a sellout.
    
    MrT
3.313CELTIK::JACOBDIHTue Oct 08 1991 14:417
    re -.312
    
    
    Y A W N !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.314What's dat smellCTHQ3::LEARYTue Oct 08 1991 14:4313
    Several thousand fans from Cincinnati,
    Why 3/4 of dem musta be from Kaintuck, so if'n you import 'em to
    Pittsburgh, that'll lower/increase the IQ level of Steel City by a
    significant amount, dependin' on yo' perspective. Since Pittsburghians
    support said-maimster UlfEeeee,I gotsa believe the IQ will be greatly
    increased.
    
    
    And THAT's even admittin' that when several thousand Cincinnati fans
    simultaneously think, all fire dept.'s are put on top alert!!
    
    MikeL
    
3.315CELTIK::JACOBDIHTue Oct 08 1991 15:4027
    
    >>support said-maimster UlfEeeee,I gotsa believe the IQ will be greatly
    >>increased.
    
    
    >>And THAT's even admittin' that when several thousand Cincinnati fans
    >>simultaneously think, all fire dept.'s are put on top alert!!
    
    >>MikeL
    
    
    Hey Mike, thanks, I was feelin' sorta down today until I read this and
    got a huge laugh out of it.
    
                                  
    BTW, who has 18 teef and an IQ of 136??????
    
    The State of Ohio(not including Clevescum)
    with Clevescum it's
    
    19 teef and an IQ of 63
    
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.316CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RThe gnat that bit MrTTue Oct 08 1991 18:3321
From: clarinews@clarinet.com
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball,clari.news.law.crime.sex,clari.news.group.women,biz.clarinet.sample
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 91 10:10:27 EDT
 
	PHILADELPHIA (UPI) -- A New Jersey woman claims New York Mets pitcher
David Cone raped her in a Philadelphia hotel room last weekend.
	Police say they are investigating the allegations by the 24-year-
woman but no charges have been filed.
	The woman says the 28-year-old Cone assaulted her at the Hilton
Towers in downtown Philadelphia on Saturday night.
	Hours after the alleged assault, Cone tied a National League record
by striking out 19 Philadelphia Phillies in the last game of the season.
	The woman reported the incident on Sunday.
	A published report Tuesday quotes a source as saying Cone and the
woman, who were previously acquainted, met at a bar Saturday night and
then went to Cone's room.
	According to the report in the Philadelphia Inquirer, the woman
contends Cone, who was naked, forced himself on her after she gave him a
massage.
	Police spokesman Ed Tenuto says that for now the incident is being
treated as an ``allegation,'' not a rape.
3.317CELTIK::JACOBIGRFHWed Oct 09 1991 14:2510
    I see USelessA TODAY researches their facks.
    
    The say, in both an article, and in a picture caption that Andy Van
    Slyke is a "Switch hitter".
    
    Funny, in the years that he's been in Pittsburgh, I've never once seen
    him bat right handed.
    
    JaKe
    
3.318For the record...SHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneThu Oct 10 1991 11:3210
    Pirates win 5-1.  Andy "can't hit lefties" VanSlyke took young Glavine
    deep in the first inning and had an RBI double in the third.  That
    essentially ended it.  So lord knows why Drabek felt compelled to try
    to turn that double into a triple.  He could be out for his next
    scheduled start (Sunday) but the paper today says it doesn't appear to
    be that serious.
    
    Go Bucs!
    
    	--dan'l
3.319STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesThu Oct 10 1991 11:5513
    > Pirates win 5-1.  Andy "can't hit lefties" VanSlyke took young Glavine
    > deep in the first inning and had an RBI double in the third.  That
    > essentially ended it. 
    
    yep, when I saw that ball go over the fence I knew right then and there
    it wasn't going to be the Braves' night.
    
    Got a kick out of how Buck and McCarver said absolutely nothing after
    Van Slyke connected...didn't need a bunch of commentary, the crowd
    noise and picture spoke for itself.
    
    
    py
3.320CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RThe gnat that bit MrTThu Oct 10 1991 12:206
	Van Slyke does have much more of a problem with most lefties.
	Unfortunately for Atlanta, Tom Glavine isn't one of those he has
	a problem with, as his lifetime average vs Glavine is around .370.

	BTW, Doug Drabek's next scheduled start is Monday.  Randy Tomlin
	is slated as the game 4 starter on Sunday night vs Leibrandt.
3.321CAM::WAYWith Malice Toward NoneThu Oct 10 1991 12:236
Regardless of whether Drabek was smart to try and stretch it into
a triple or not, it sure was fun to watch a pitcher step into the box,
swing some lumber, and poke the ball over the CF's haid!


'Saw_who_wishes_the_DH_would_go_AWAY!
3.322We miss ya, Dan...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 10 1991 12:3320
    
> Regardless of whether Drabek was smart to try and stretch it into
> a triple or not, it sure was fun to watch a pitcher step into the box,
> swing some lumber, and poke the ball over the CF's haid!
    
    Exackly what I said when it happened...
    
    But, to be fair since he's not here, let's give equal time to the
    opinion of Dan Schneider:
    
    "That poke by Drabek is exactly why we need the DH.  It serves as a
    reminder of how rare such occurrences really are.  Why, the other two
    times up Drabek struck out feebly.  The near-triple is strictly
    anecdotal evidence of the fictional excitement that is generated with 
    a pitcher up at the plate..."
    
    We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming...
    
    glenn
    
3.323CELTIK::JACOBThu Oct 10 1991 12:3611
    T'wer a truly excellent game.
    
    Van Slyke for the HoF.
    
    Glavine should go back to hockey.  (8^)*
    
    Bucs in 5
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.324Is Drabek hurt?TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPThu Oct 10 1991 12:438
Is Drabek's injury serious?  I heard pulled muscle, but didn't hear if he will
be able to make his next start.

I know Van Slyke gets his share of press, but it was still nice to see him as 
the hero, rather than Bonds or Bonilla.  Taking nothing away from those guys,
of course.

=Bob=
3.325CELTIK::JACOBThu Oct 10 1991 13:4111
    Lasted nites crowd of 57k+ was the largest crowd ever to see a game at
    3 Rivers Stadium.
    
    Haven't heard whether Drabek's injury is major or not.  ESPN this AM
    said Drabek will be checked today and more will be known later.
    
    Van Slyke earned a major portion of his $4.2 million lasted night.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.326yup we miss him...AGNT99::CHILDSHey Sis, pull my toungue out ,will ya?Thu Oct 10 1991 14:5212
 Most excellent Glenn!!!!!hahahahahaa

 If I didn't look at the header I'd have sworn I was reading true Schneidisms...

 hahaa

 yup Andy's shot was the game last night. Before it Glavine looked like
 a cool collected customer, after it he looked all hopped up like he'd
 got a bad batch of Saw's Shrooms....

 mike
3.328Sweep?SHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneThu Oct 10 1991 15:585
>	BTW, Doug Drabek's next scheduled start is Monday.  
    
    They're starting the world series on Monday?  ;-}
    
    	--dan'l
3.329Andy is a rocket scientist on off daysGRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Thu Oct 10 1991 16:5511
    I am as big a fan of VanSlyke as possible.  I got to point this out
    however...
    
    In the post game interview, Andy says...
    
    "Now I know how Cin. felt after taking the first game last year."
    
    Obviously Andy is no brain surgeon.  Pitt won game one last year.  It
    must be nice to be in your own little world!
    
    Rick
3.330CELTIK::JACOBThu Oct 10 1991 17:047
    Van SLyke's clubhouse nickname is "Norman Bates".
    
    That about says it all.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.331Andy Van Slyke = William Bedford = Jack Clark = brain surgeonsTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPThu Oct 10 1991 17:170
3.332Great pitching on both sides last nightSHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneFri Oct 11 1991 10:1610
    Barry Bonds continues to be Mr. Untober.  At two key points in last
    night's game he grounded into a double play and popped up.  The latter
    was especially costly because Bonilla had a lead off double and there
    were no outs in the ninth.  Braves win 1-0 in a terrific pitcher's
    duel.
    
    He better produce in Atlanta or the Pirates might have a long trip home
    next Monday night.  They need to win two or they're done.
    
    	--dan'l
3.333CELTIK::JACOBFri Oct 11 1991 12:3017
    IMHO, Avery threw a masterpiece at the Bucs lasted night.
    
    What killed the Bucs was the mis-play at third base, which allowed Dave
    Justice to score.   I think it was a combination of Bueschel splitting
    his concentration between getting the ball and tagging Justice, instead
    of concentrating on getting the ball first, then worrying about
    Justice, and one ton of spin on the ball causing it to take a weird
    hop.    When Zane Smith got out of the bases loaded and nobody out jam
    in the second, I thought it would be another oneof the Bucs nights, but
    Steve Avery had different thoughts on that, eh!!
    
    On to Atlanta tomorrow and as --dan'l, Mr Swimmer, said, the Bucs HAVE
    to take 2 out of 3 there or we could be witnessing 1990 all over again.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.334Pirates didn't even whimper till the eighthNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 11 1991 12:4320
    > Barry Bonds continues to be Mr. Untober.  At two key points in last
    > night's game he grounded into a double play and popped up.  The latter
    > was especially costly because Bonilla had a lead off double and there
    > were no outs in the ninth.  Braves win 1-0 in a terrific pitcher's
    > duel.
    
    Three-and-one count, too, dan'l.  That really hurt.  Bonds had reason 
    to be upset after that one, although it's generally considered classier 
    to throw your tantrum in the dugout instead of out on the field.
    
    Steve Avery was immense.  I think one of the biggest myths in baseball 
    is the advantage of being the "experienced veteran" in a pennant race 
    and the postseason (as the Braves have shown since the All-Star break).  
    In the last two days we've seen great efforts from Juan Guzman and now
    Avery, who looks like he's still a junior in high school.  If you're 
    good, you're good...
    
    glenn
    
3.335TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPFri Oct 11 1991 12:446
It's too bad that Beucelle will wear the goat's hat for lasted night.  From
what I saw on ESPN towards the end of the season he was rock solid at 3B.  I 
agree that Avery pitched a great game, nothing like a good old pitchers duel/
defensive game.

=Bob=
3.336CELTIK::JACOBFri Oct 11 1991 13:5614
3.337AXIS::ROBICHAUDCarolina BlueFri Oct 11 1991 13:594
	If all the games are like last night, I hope this thing goes
    7 games.
    
    				/Don
3.338CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEFri Oct 11 1991 14:028
    Jake, nothing used to get me PO'd more than having someone take a pitch
    in that situation, with a count of 2 strikes already.  
    
    Hey, we need a modern-day Yogi Berra.  Hell, he used to pick them off
    of his feet, or even over his head, and get that run in.  Probably was
    THE best badball hitter to ever play.
    
    Lee
3.339No. 21SHALOT::HUNTTed, that's the prom queen !!!Fri Oct 11 1991 14:308
3.341I'll cast a vote for Billy Williams as well ...LUNER::BROOKSClarence T, are you down wit OPP ?Fri Oct 11 1991 15:091
    
3.342SMARTT::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 11 1991 16:033
    I don't know about best, but according to my calendar of Hall of Famers
    hanging in my office, this month's calendar boy, Yogi Berra, was "a
    notorious badball hitter."
3.343mike royko articleJUPITR::PARTEECharlie -- Lemieux est le mieuxSat Oct 12 1991 14:4579
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Mike Royko)
Newsgroups: clari.feature.mike_royko
Subject: NICE TOWNS FINISH IN FIRST, AT LAST
Date: 9 Oct 91 16:30:30 GMT
 
MIKE ROYKO
	
	The last time the Cubs made the playoffs, readers in other parts of
the country sent me numerous newspaper columns written by those who
loathe the Cubs, their fans and Chicago.
	They were fun to read because that's part of baseball's charm,
finding some irrational reason to dislike strangers and hoping a flyball
lands on their heads.
	Because the Cubs are so seldom involved in postseason play, I've
always prepared for the playoffs and the World Series by trying to work
up a good hate. It's either that or fall asleep in front of the tube.
	The choice has been easy when a New York team is involved, Yankees or
Mets. The Yankees, because as a child I was taught that they represented
the greedy forces of Wall Street who exploited the workers. My
grandfather taught me that. I later learned that my grandfather was
mostly exploited by bookies and bartenders, but I disliked the Yankees
out of habit.
	And the Mets? Well, any Cubs fan knows why.
	It is also easy to generate an instant grudge against any California
team, with their effete, face-lifted, fanny-tucked movie-star groupies
and laid-back, trend-hopping, glassy-eyed fans. If nothing else, I
merely remind myself that California gave the nation Richard Nixon and
Ronald Reagan. May its grapes rot.
	As you can see, the players have nothing to do with it. The choice of
hate objects is dictated by the city, the state or the region. Sort of
my own personal mini-civil war.
	In a pinch, for example, I can develop an instant hate against
Boston. It's a nice city, but I just remind myself that Harvard is
there, and like any decent, envious, class-conscious American, I'm
filled with resentment. And the thought of Ted Kennedy helps too.
	But this year, generating even a mild dislike is a challenge. I can't
remember any playoffs when there have been four cities so ... I'm trying
to think of the right word ... decent, I suppose.
	Minneapolis. How can anyone dislike Minneapolis? The city is so
clean. The politicians are so honest that they must be retarded. And the
people, most of them well-scrubbed Scandinavians, are so polite and
decent that when they catch a walleye, which is their main recreational
activity, they thank it for biting their hook. And Minneapolis gave us
Hubert Humphrey, the last liberal Democrat who didn't look morose.
	Pittsburgh, another town that can only be described as nice. Can
anyone say Detroit is nice? Or Miami, Chicago, New York or even
Philadelphia? No, but Pittsburgh is nice. It used to be a sooty mill
town, but now it is neat. Many of the people are real ethnics, but they
don't stomp each other out of pride. And I'm told that very few women in
Pittsburgh get their biceps tattooed anymore.
	Toronto. I suppose I could use the fact that it's a Canadian city as
an excuse to sneer and jeer at their efforts to become champions of our
national pastime. (No, not homicide, silly, baseball.) And if it were
Montreal, I might become chauvinistic because in Montreal they persist
in talking French, a language favored by twits and snobs. I even resent
the fact that French is spoken in Paris, a practice calculated to
frustrate American tourists. But Toronto is another clean, civilized
city. And when I visited there, I couldn't help being impressed at how
fluently the natives spoke English, considering that they are
foreigners.
	Atlanta. It is a tempting target because it's in the South, and I've
never understood why Southerners brag about their hospitality when their
roadside restaurants deep fry everything, even spaghetti, and their bars
are populated by beady-eyed guys named Junior and Rufus, who are hostile
to anyone who doesn't have facial bottle scars. But Atlanta isn't like
that. The last time I was there, I ate in a fine restaurant where the
waiter removed the cork from the wine bottle and offered it for my
perusal. That is sophistication. And with a touch of salt on it, it was
the finest cork I ever ate. Besides, Ted Turner is from Atlanta, and
ever since he took up with Jane Fonda, she hasn't said one idiotic
thing, which is her all-time record.
	So I don't know what I'm going to do to generate some wholesome
venom. I never thought I'd say it. Or even think it. And I'm not sure
that I can write it. But I'll try.
	I really miss the Mets.
	
	(C) 1991 BY THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE
	DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
    
3.344royko article: Bucs doomed...JUPITR::PARTEECharlie -- Lemieux est le mieuxSat Oct 12 1991 14:4795
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Mike Royko)
Newsgroups: clari.feature.mike_royko
Subject: PIRATES COURTING `FACTOR' DISASTER
Date: 11 Oct 91 16:01:41 GMT
 
MIKE ROYKO
	
	It was a year ago, almost to the day, that I was the target of
widespread ridicule and derision. Oh, the hooting and jeering I endured.
	That was the day, shortly before the World Series began, that the
headline above my essay declared: ``A's might as well throw in the
towel.''
	As that headline indicated, I had written that the Oakland A's did
not have the remotest chance of winning the series.
	Some of my sportswriting associates and many readers thought it was
the most idiotically funny thing they had ever seen.
	Didn't I know, they asked, that the mighty A's were overwhelming,
unbeatable, incomparable, and were creating a dynasty? They had won the
previous World Series in four straight. They had just won their playoff
series in four straight. They were like Desert Storm.
	Or, in the words of Ben Bentley, host of the Sportswriters TV
madhouse: ``Could the A's be the greatest team in history?''
	We all know what happened next. Not only did they lose, but they
didn't win one game. They were crushed and humiliated, and they haven't
been the same since.
	So here we are, once again approaching the World Series. And once
again I caution the experts: Don't sneer at a mysterious force that is
so powerful it defies all odds, all logic, and can change the course of
baseball history.
	I'm referring, of course, to the amazing Ex-Cub Factor.
	For those who may be unaware of it, the Ex-Cub Factor works this way:
	Since 1946, 14 teams have entered the World Series with three or more
former Cubs on their rosters.
	As with Oakland last year, some of these teams were thought to be
superior to their opponent. Others weren't that strong. But bulge of
bicep, fleetness of foot, managerial cunning, experience, poise -- none
of it mattered.
	All but one of these Cubs-tainted teams lost.
	That's what happened last year. The Oakland A's had three ex-Cubs.
They lost in four straight games. One year earlier, when they had only
two ex-Cubs, they won in four straight games. Strange, eerie and
terrifying.
	So what does that tell us will happen this year? It tells us that if
the brawny and cocky Pittsburgh Pirates get past the upstart Atlanta
Braves, the Pirates will be doomed.
	That's because the Pirates, in an act of suicidal folly, put four ex-
Cubs on their roster. No other team in the playoffs has the curse of
even three.
	You would think that by now, no team would defy the Ex-Cub Factor. It
hasn't been a secret.
	It was discovered in 1981 by a Ron Berler, a Chicago writer, teacher
and baseball stats nut. He sounded the alarm, but did the experts
listen? No, they sneered and said it had no scientific validity; it was
just a silly, meaningless coincidence.
	That's what they said when the Boston Red Sox had certain victory
within their grasp. Then Bill Buckner, one of their three ex-Cubs, let
that fatal ground ball dribble it all away.
	And that's what they said before the unbeatable Oakland A's, with
their four ex-Cubs, turned to mush.
	Naturally, the ex-Cubs become indignant when it is suggested that
they might be responsible for disaster.
	A reporter mentioned the Factor to Gary Varsho, one of the four ex-
Cubs on the Pirates. He dismissed it, saying: ``No one around here
brings it up or thinks about it.''
	Naturally, he'd say that. If managers ever come to accept the virtual
certainty of the Factor, no ex-Cub would be able to find work. They
might have to file discrimination complaints with the federal
government. But even the bureaucrats might hesitate to take action when
they looked at the evidence.
	Nobody knows why the Cub factor is so devastating. It isn't that the
ex-Cubs are terrible players. Some are remarkably good, such as Dennis
Eckersley, of the A's, who became a big star after he left the Cubs. Of
course, he might have been a big star with the Cubs if he had ever
experimented with pitching while sober.
	Some students of the game believe that having once been Cubs gives
players something called ``Cubness,'' which means that in their hearts
they know they're losers.
	But this theory doesn't hold up. If a team has only one or two ex-
Cubs, their Cubness doesn't appear. Which is why Toronto, with mighty
Joe Carter, an ex-Cub, isn't afflicted. Only when there are three does
the Factor kick in.
	Which has led some scholars, such as Dr. I.M. Kookie, the noted
expert on lots of stuff, to theorize that it is not a curse, but a virus
that becomes active only when there are three carriers in the same
dugout.
	If this is true, one would think that the government would have
launched a research program to isolate this virus and find a cure.
	But as Dr. Kookie says: ``There would be a taxpayers' revolt. With
all the other problems in the world, why spend good money to find out
why Cubs are losers? It's something we have to live with. Like the new
old saying goes: `Two Cubs are company, three's a complete disaster.'''
	
	(C) 1991 BY THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE
	DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
    
3.345Bonds SucksSHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneMon Oct 14 1991 02:298
    Pirates take game four, 3-2 in ten innings.  Ex Digital employee Mike
    LaVallier tags clutch hit.
    
    I'm a complete ball of noives.
    
    Goodnight.
    
    	--dan'l
3.346CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 12:1711
    I just figured something out.   
    
    Eric Gregg is using a chartered "Concorde" plane and travelling at high
    speeds betwixt the ALCS games and the NLCS games.  At the ALCS games he
    is going by the name of Kirby Puckett!!!
    
    
    Many, many (8^)*'s
    
    JaKe
    
3.347CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 12:2116
    The Bucs are trying hard to overcome the "Ex-Cub factor", as they have
    more ex Cubbies on their roster than the Atlanta Braves do.
    
    BTW, is it just me or what.  Somewhere near the 3rd inning of each
    game, I'm ready to turn off the TV sound 'cause I'm sick of that Indian
    singing in the stands at Fullofit County Stadium.  Hell, I'd rather
    watch the Steeler games and see Brister's mother 3 or 4 hundred times a
    game than listen to that chanting.
    
    I still say the Braves fans stole the "tomahawk chop" motion from
    PeeWee Herman!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.348CAM::WAYParty on, GarthMon Oct 14 1991 12:2313
What annoys me is that you can tell the Atlanta fans are "rookie fans".

Having just hopped on the bandwagon at mid-season or so, they are inept
as to the art of true fandom.

That tomahawk chop thing is SOOOOO hokey, ad are most of the fans.

It almost peed my pant last night, as the camera found these two old
ladies, who most likely had no idea that a curve ball is any different
that a highball, and they're all doing the tomahawk chop.  Stupid.


'Saw
3.349CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 12:2713
    I HAVE A REQUEST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    I'm in class out here in Colorado Springs all day today, and the
    Bucs-Braves game starts at 1pm, Colorado time.
    
    Could someone that listens(or watches) today game whilst it is going on
    put some updates in here throughtout the afternoon????
    
    
    It would be DEEPLY APPRECIATED!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.350Tomahawk thisSHALOT::MEDVIDI'll sail this ship aloneMon Oct 14 1991 12:3622
>    BTW, is it just me or what.  Somewhere near the 3rd inning of each
>    game, I'm ready to turn off the TV sound 
    
    It's Tim McCarver that's getting to me.  He adds nothing to the game as
    far as I'm concerned.  "Yes, Tim, I did see the catcher run to third on
    the bunt.  Routine.  You don't have to replay it five times."  Why does
    he insist on reporting the extremely obvious when just the obvious will
    do?
    
    Last year, when Penn State played FSU in the Blockbuster Bowl, the
    Seminole fans did the tomahawk thing the entire game.  At the time, I
    thought it was great.  In fact, I remember saying to myself, "I wish I
    had gone to school there.  That looks like a fun crowd."  Now I'm not
    so sure.  Maybe it's the fact that these adults are the ones doing it,
    including Jane Fonda and the former president of the US.
    
    Actually, when they show the crowd, you can see some old, die-hard
    Braves fans (the few hundred that went to the games even when they were
    losing) just sitting there.  I can almost hear them saying, "For God's
    sake, ya'll, please shut up!"
    
    	--dan'l
3.351CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 12:409
    
    >>so sure.  Maybe it's the fact that these adults are the ones doing it,
    >>including Jane Fonda and the former president of the US.
                ^^^^^^^^^^
    
    I must say, for someone in her 50's. Jane still looks pretty good!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.352CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 13:239
    While Barry Bonds continues to possess a VERY anemic bat, he does
    continue to play good defense.
    
    I felt he got screwed on being charged with an error on the play at the
    plate in the first inning.  Slaught missed the ball, the throw was on
    the money.
    
    JaKe
    
3.353CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 14 1991 13:392
    The ex-Cubs factor doesn't kick in until the WS.  There is no
    correlation between number of ex-Cubbies and CS performance.
3.354BSS::JCOTANCHSeachickens &amp; Blue Jays are Chokers!Mon Oct 14 1991 13:4412
    Come on JaKe, if you were a *real* baseball fan you would've been sick
    today.  :^) :^)
    
    Let's get this straight once and for all: the FSU fans originated the
    tomahawk chop and the Indian chant; the Braves and Chiefs have copied
    it just this year.  I turned on a few minutes of the baseball game last
    night and Atlanta's chant is weak - the FSU fans can make that
    much noise when they're on the road.  You ever watch an FSU home game?  
    That war chant is very, very loud the whole game. 
    
    
    Joe
3.355Anyone hear an echoCTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSMon Oct 14 1991 14:007
    I cain't wait till nexted year when my new amour, them Cleveland
    Indians start out of the block in April
    Cain't you feel the emotion!! The 250 Indian fans Chop, Chop, Choppin'
    away!
    
    MikeL
    
3.356STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesMon Oct 14 1991 14:159
    > Let's get this straight once and for all: the FSU fans originated the
    > tomahawk chop and the Indian chant
    
    No one disputes that -- in fact, didn't all this Braves chopping start
    with Deion Sanders (from FSU) doing it in the dugout in an early seaosn
    game?
    
    
    py
3.357CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 14:169
    
    >>Come on JaKe, if you were a *real* baseball fan you would've been sick
    >>today.  :^) :^)
    
    I'd kill for one of those SONY Watchman things right now(well actually,
    in about 2 hrs and 45 mins.)
    
    JaKe
    
3.359SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Oct 14 1991 14:1814
    
    	Ditto on this chanting...  It is stolen and Atlanta and Chief
    fans should have to pay restitution to FSU! :-)
    
    	I'll admit, a couple of years ago when I watched FSU for the first
    time against Miami and their fans were doing that chant, I felt the
    same as Dan'l...awesome chant.  This is what college football in
    general is all about.  To this day, when I hear it, it sends chills
    up and down my spine.  Greatest cheer I've heard, and I think it is
    pretty un-imaginative for these other teams to adopt it as their own.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
3.360stop the chant!GRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Mon Oct 14 1991 14:416
    Between McCarver's innane chatter and the war chant, I'm glad I have a
    mute button on the remote control.  The headaches are getting to me.
    Why can't the fans in Atlanta just scream, yell, and throw stuff like
    the rest of the country?
    
    Rick
3.36110/14 NLCS GameCGVAX2::MILLERMon Oct 14 1991 17:425
    
    Does anybody have an update to this afternoons game?
    
    
    steve
3.362CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 17:4911
    If someone with brains went into Fullofit County stadium in Atlanta,
    and went to each fan with a fake foam tomahawk, and shoved the thing
    down the owners throat, what would the maintenance crew have to clean
    up under the seats after the game????
    
    Toma-HOCKERS!!!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.363RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 17:513
    zip-zip after 2.  Braves just had the sacks saturated with no outs,
    but failed to score.
    
3.364updateGRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Mon Oct 14 1991 17:595
    Bucs go down 1-2-3 in the top of the third.  In the home half of the
    second... Glavin fails to get the suicide squeeze bunt down... the
    Pirates get a double play.
    
    Rick
3.365RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 18:152
    0-0, Braves batting in bottom of 4th ...
    
3.3660-0 after 4RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 18:267
    Braves seemingly go up 1-0 in the 4th, as David Justice scores from
    2nd on a single.  
    
    BUT NO!!!!!!!!!!  He missed 3rd base!!!!!!  Declared ***OUT***!!!!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.367BizarreRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOHi-OO Silver, AwaaayyyyMon Oct 14 1991 18:2716
    ANd a bizarre bottom of the 4th.  Justice hits a grounder toward lind
    that Redus fields and throws away - Justice to 2nd.
    
    Hunter hits a tapper in front of plate, and is called out on
    interference - just like Armbrister/Fisk, I guess (I'm listening on the
    radio, not watching...)
    
    Then Olson hits a line drive to center, that is questioned if it is a
    catch or not.  It is.  2 outs, Justice on 2nd.
    
    Lemke singled, Justice scored - but is called out when Smith throws
    ball to Buchele at 3rd - Justice missed the base...
    
    Braves are squandering lots of chances...
    
    JD
3.368SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:306
    Bonds just popped up to lead off the fifth.  Oh wait, that's not knew. 
    You probably could have guessed that.
    
    VanSlyke did indeed catch that ball in the bottom of the 4th.  No question.
    
    
3.369SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:332
    Beuchel and Slaught on first and second, 1 out.
    
3.370SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:341
    Beuchel scores on Lind's RBI single.  Pirates lead 1-0.
3.371Keep dem reports comingCELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 18:388
    Good work --dan'l, JD, and ACChris, keep it up, I got to see the 
    lasted out of the 4th whilst on break but it's back to serious learning
    now.
    
    Mucho Appreciated
    
    JaKe
    
3.372SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:391
    Pirates strand Slaught and Lind, lead 1-0 going into bottom of 5th.
3.373SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:512
    Atlanta threatens in bottom of 5th but comes up empty.  Smith pitching
    well.
3.374SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:565
    VanSlyke doubles off Glavine.  Deadmeat of the order coming up with one
    out in top of 6th.  
    
    Bonilla being intentionally walked.  Here you go, Mr. Bonds.  Time to
    deliver.
3.375SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:581
    Bonnds strikes out looking.  What a freaking bum.
3.376SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 18:591
    Beuchel grounds out for third out.
3.377SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 19:051
    1-2-3 inning for Smith in bottom of 6th.
3.378SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 19:101
    1-2-3 inning for Glavine (Smith being third out).
3.379Still 1-0.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 19:183
    Braves go down 1, 2, 3.
    
    
3.380SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 19:303
    Top of the 8th, 2 outs, Bell on third.  Again they intentionally walk
    Bonilla to pitch to Bonds and true to form, Bonds flies out.  Still 1-0
    Pirates in bottom of 8th.
3.381RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 19:353
    Bottom of 8th, 2 out.  Pendleton triples.  Leyland replacing Smith
    w/ Roger Mason ...
    
3.382SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 19:361
    Pendelton hits two-out triple in 8th.  Leyland calls for Roger Mason.
3.383RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 19:362
    Beat ya to it, dan'l!
    
3.384Hi, Chris!SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 19:361
    
3.385Hi.RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 19:372
    This is just like VAX PHONE!
    
3.386RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueMon Oct 14 1991 19:402
    Gant pops up.  1-0 after 8.
    
3.387SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 19:421
    Roger Mason shuts down Braves.
3.388SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 19:534
    Pirates get Beuchel to third with two outs.  Leyland does not hit for
    Mason.  Tries suicide squeeze.  Pena balks (yes it looked like one to
    me, he had his hands up and set for a second) but it isn't called. 
    Leyland pretty POed.  Mason strikes out.
3.389ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYClarence Thomas for PresidentMon Oct 14 1991 19:5813
    Hey, I don't wanna place a down note in here but we were watching
    the game last night and everybody was noticing how tentative, even
    defensive, the Pirates were playing.  Then on came a shot a Jim
    Leyland smoking a butt in the dugout.  Some wag in the room then
    commented, "no wonder Leyland's smoking and the Pirates need dumb
    errors to win games - the Pirates' coach looks like a_AIDS victim,
    so he figures he doesn't have long to live anyway and the players 
    just want to finish these games and git out a the lockerroom and
    shower back at the hotel!"
    
    Unfair comment?  Maybe.  But this had to be reported.
    
    MrT(wins Win)
3.390SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 20:001
    One out, bottom of ninth, Braves have runners on first and second.
3.391Pirates lead series 3-2.SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadMon Oct 14 1991 20:043
    Roger Mason pitches out of jam.  Pirates win 1-0.
    
    Zane Smith player of the game.
3.392CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 20:0610
    Re .389
    
    "T" go tell your mother she wants ya.   Already trying to stir things
    up for the BUcs/Minnysoda series that the Bucs will take in 6, huh??
    
    re --dan'l and ACChris, thanks tons for the updates.  DEEPLY
    Preshkiated!!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.393yea, guys - thanks for the updates - making a late night more enjoyableTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPMon Oct 14 1991 20:340
3.394CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 20:4717
3.395CELTIK::JACOBMon Oct 14 1991 20:557
    FWIW, 
    
    Barry "0-fer" Bonds is 3 for 20, .150 avg, with NO RBI, with 3 stolen
    bases.
    
    JaKe
    
3.396They had 'em all the way!PRAVDA::JACKSONYou run your mouth, I'll run my business brotherMon Oct 14 1991 22:3438
    I just looked for this note today, and found it to be enjoying.  (esp
    the "What a freaking bum" comment about Bonds)
    
    
    It's amazing that Bonds has come up to be such a bum in post-season
    play.  (and I wish that nitwit would stop saying "he's always
    dangerous when he comes to the plate")   I took in three games in
    Pittsburgh this summer (they sewpt the hated Mets) and Bonds was on
    fire.  The guy can really hit the ball, but this week he sucks!
    
    Other comments:
    
    	Bonds got a bum rap for the throwing error
    	Jay Bell was out at third
    	Both teams have squandered more runs in this one series than
    	  I've ever seen before
    	The Pirates are the better team, but they sure aren't playing 
     	  Like it.
    	Leland took a hell of a chance today letting Mason hit
    	  (he would have been in serious trouble if the braves had scored)
    	Why do these games start so damned late?  Last night's 12:30 finish
    	  was a pain in the ass.
    	Is Doug Drabek really that stupid to try to stretch it to third?
    	Is Leland that stupid to encourage that behavior?
    	The Atlanta fans are obnoxious with their chop.  It was neat the
    	   first time I saw it
    	Tim McCarver is an idiot
    
    And finally
    
    	I'm Soooooo Jealous of my brother, who has tickets to Games 6/7 of
    the NLCS and games 3/4 of the World Series.
    
    
    -bill
    From Pittsburgh
    
    
3.397back to the quiet of 3RiversGRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Mon Oct 14 1991 22:3814
    Barry "I want 4.2 mil" Bonds may not need to wake up...
    
    VanSlyke's comment about bad Pirate pitching sure looks stupid now...
    
    The much maligned Buc pitching appears to be good enough.  Mason really
    did a great job today.  Five pitches to Gant and not one ball.
    
    How good are the Pirates at catching the ball in the OF?  As good as it
    gets.
    
    This series may be over in game six.  Thank goodness the chant is
    history for this NLCS!
    
    Rick
3.398Time for MrT to take in his first game of the year againNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 14 1991 22:4319
    
    The Pirates may just yet win this thing, but I gotta admit that they're
    giving me heart failure doing it.  The Braves have outplayed them, but
    just aren't pulling the trigger on situations.  Two tight games in a 
    row where an Atlanta win probably pushes the Bucs over the edge for
    good, but they manage to pull 'em both out (thank gawd that Cox pulled
    Mercker last night; I had a good feeling about the forgotten free agent 
    Spanky Lavalliere-- Smokey Burgess reincarnate-- coming through, what 
    with all this billion-dollar talent around him floundering).  Hopefully 
    Game 6 will be short and sweet, with the Bucs finally breaking loose at 
    home.
    
    It's everyone's greatest nightmare looking like it'll be back from the 
    dead: Pittsburgh versus Minnetwinky (no cockiness here; until counted 
    out these Braves are still alive).  Gotta hand it to those northerners 
    to keep coming back from adversity, only to be hammered down again...
    
    glenn
    
3.399A few things...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 02:5413
>    - the Pirates' coach looks like a_AIDS victim,
>    so he figures he doesn't have long to live anyway 
    
    T, this is one of the most offensive and insensative comments I have
    ever read in this conference.  Please be a little more careful in the
    future.
    
    Bill Jackson, were you at the Saturday game in August when the Bucs
    swept the Mets?  So was I!  Two SPORTS noters so close and not getting
    together?  What's wrong with us?!?
    
    	--dan'l
    
3.400No more Braves...Puhleeze!HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Oct 15 1991 10:102
        That stupid war chant is starting to make the wave look good!
                                          Denny
3.401WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Tue Oct 15 1991 10:576
    Re -1   I'll second that! Just a bunch of yuppies trying to get back to
           nature learning how to chop firewood. Please.....somebody make
           them stop!
     
                                                   Night Flier  ~~v~~
3.402Another good, old fashion pitcher's duelTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHDr. Seuss - RIPTue Oct 15 1991 11:0511
From what I saw of the highlights of yesterday's game, it looks like the Braves
came down with a case of Red Sox disease (not beign able to come up with 
important hits).  

I heard on the radio this morning that replays reveal that David Justice did
indeed graze third base with his spikes on the way by.  Think of the uproar if
baseball had an instant replay official, and changed that ruling!!11

=Bob=

BTW - thanks again for the updates, guys
3.403Win some, lose someSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 12:115
    There was a miniscule puff of white powder only visible on super slow
    instant replay.  The fact that Justice didn't even argue the call says
    that he himself didn't feel his foot hit third.  Good call.
    
    	--dan'l
3.404Da umpires viewCELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 12:2219
    Umpire Crew Chief Doug Harbey's version of what happened yesterday,
    from USelessA TODAY:
    
    -on Dave Justice's failure to touch third after scoring on Mark Lemke's
    single:  "If you notice on replays, he went around third, held up and
    then broke.  He had a thought in his mind that he had missed third
    base.  That was the tipoff right there, when he stumbled, took a step
    back toward third and then broke for home"
    
    -On Andy Van Slyke's running grasstop catch of Greg Olson's liner
    "There was a catch and Dana DeMuth from the left field line ran out and
    called it immediately.  There was no doubt in my mind on it."
    
    -on the batter's interference against Brian Hunter:  "The hitter hit
    the ball, and he moved out in front of the plate and stood there.  Then
    he didn't make an attempt to run and they collided.  He never made an
    attempt to run."
    
    JaKe
3.405RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOThe Sons of Katie ElderTue Oct 15 1991 13:1625
    First, it always amazes me how snobbish fans are.  Whenever a team that
    hasn't been in the playoffs for a while gets in, and their fans show
    some enthusiasm, 'real' fans get down on them.  
    
    I think the chant is pretty neat.  I cold do without the foam tomahawks
    - but hey - i like them better than white hankies or green weenies.
    
    What's the big deal - what's the proper way to cheer.  Perhaps someone
    in this conference should write a book (hey, maybe we could collaborate
    on it) about the proper way to cheer at a ballpark.
    
    No doubt, most folks would want to use say, Boston fans, as models.  
    
    On the Series;
    
    I thought the Suicide Squeeze was a stupid call by Cox.  Bases loaded,
    let the pitcher strike out, and have your #1 and #2 men try to bring a
    run in.   
    
    Also, I think Cox should be playing Bream instead of Hunter.  Bream
    gets pumped up playing his ex-mates, plus he has experience and soul.
    I don't care about the lefty/righty thing.  I think using Hunter must
    make Leyland and the Bucs happy.
    
    JD
3.406AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopTue Oct 15 1991 13:316
    	Justice did touch third and lucky for Barry Bonds that the umpire
    blew it because he would've had to answer why he double pumped and
    held on to the ball so long then made a bad throw to the plate.
    I wonder if Ed Armbrister watched the game?
    
    				/Don
3.407SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Oct 15 1991 14:1618
    
    re: -2
    
    	Wait a minute...the green weenie is sacred!  The green weenie was
    seen as a lucky charm to the 60 Pirates.  It just didn't develop over
    night during the world series.  You can't even put foam tomahawks in
    the same class as the green weenie!  
    
    	It seems as if Pittsburgh fans have a special place in their hearts
    for these lucky charms..  I can think of three.  The green weenie which
    helped propel the Pirates to the 60 series win.  The terrible towel
    which came along way before SB XIII, but helped propel the Steelers
    to 2 additional SB titles, and the babushka (sp).  The babushka was
    not as evident as the other two, but it was a trendy thing in the early
    70's for the Pirates.
    
    							bill..g.
    
3.408GENRAL::WADETue Oct 15 1991 14:238
    
    	Not that it means anythang now, but Justice DID touch
    	3rd.  Jake, Glen Johnson, and I all saw the replay at
    	my house.  We all agreed he touched it.  It was ever
    	so slight, but that "puff of chalk" came from off the
    	top of the bag, not the foul line.
    
    	Claybroon
3.409SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Tue Oct 15 1991 14:4115
    
    re:-1
    
    	Well, there's a decent shot in the Boston Herald that shows Justice
    not touching the bag as he rounds it.  The shot is from slightly above
    the thrid base line directly in line with the bag.  The bag is in the
    left of the photo and Justice is on the right side about a foot away
    while turning.  
    
    	To be honest, I didn't see the play, but from this picture, it
    is pretty clear that he didn't touch the bag and that the chalk dust
    people are talking about is from the line.
    
    							bill..g.
    
3.410Carnac The Umpire ???SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Tue Oct 15 1991 14:4227
3.411PRAVDA::JACKSONYou run your mouth, I'll run my business brotherTue Oct 15 1991 14:556
RE: .399

Yea, I was there for all three days in August against the Mets.  


-bill
3.412CHIEFF::CHILDSInthehotredlightofablack&amp;white ROSESGROWTue Oct 15 1991 15:126

 What slays me about the call is that when you look at Alomar's supposed
 double play the other day when he spread-eagled the bag and the other
 automatics they give the defense that they could turn around and call
 that. I for one also thought he grazed the top of the bag....
3.413GENRAL::WADETue Oct 15 1991 15:254
    
    	A still photo has nothing on a slow motion replay....
    
    	Claybroon
3.414SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 15:546
    
    A slow motion replay has nothing on a split-second call on the field.
    
    Thank goodness baseball is still pure.
    
    	--dan'l
3.415Braves got gyped, but also didn't help themselvesSTAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesTue Oct 15 1991 15:549
    From the angle on the slow-mo replay I saw, it appear that Justice
    brushed the bag.
    
    That being said, failure to get anything across with bases loaded and
    none out in the second croaked the Braves just as much as any calls/
    noncalls....
    
    
    py
3.416Braves should have won it in the second anywaySHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 16:0311
    BTW, Bonds double pumped because he saw Justice was at a point of
    indecision.  Justice had already stumbled by third and the third base
    coach was waving him home.  Justice, it seemed, feeling he had missed
    third faultered and thought about going back to the bag; that is when
    Bonds double pumped...why throw home when the runner isn't going?
    
    Bonds made a good throw (not excellent, just good) and it just happened
    to skip in there at the same time Justice did.  Slaught should have
    come up with it.
    
    	--dan'l
3.417Bonds = scruitinyGRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Tue Oct 15 1991 16:096
    Bonds is getting a bum rap everytime he does something in the field. 
    Both throws he's made were more than adequate.  LaValliere makes BOTH
    plays.  Slaught just isn't quite as good.  People love to pick at Bonds
    because his attitude sucks.
    
    Rick
3.418GENRAL::WADETue Oct 15 1991 16:129
    
    dan'l
    
    	I didn't mean to imply baseball needs instant replay.  I
    	hope they never institutue it.
    
    	Just pointing out a bad, easy to miss, bad call.........
    
    Claybroon
3.419GENRAL::WADETue Oct 15 1991 16:235
    
    	Quote from the local rag:
    
    		"I know I touched it," Justice said.  "It's the
    		 only reason I kept going."
3.420CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 16:476
    FWIW, in USelessA TODAY the Braves' 3rd base coach is quoted as saying
    he thought Justice missed the bag.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.421Tomorrow...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 17:1322
    OK, enough about whether Justice hit the bag, VanSlyke made the catch,
    Slaught should have come up with it, Cox should not have squeezed, etc.
    Game's over.  Pirates lead series 3-2 going back to cold Pittsburgh.

    A few Q's:

    	- Does anyone think Avery will pitch tomorrow as well has he did in
    	  game two?  Think the hamstring will knock Drabek out early?

    	- If the Pirates win this thing, who is your NLCS MVP?  No one
    	  has stood out for the Bucs.  Bell is hitting .400+, Lind leads
    	  in RBIs, Beuchel has had a good series.  If Avery does a number
    	  on Pittsburgh tomorrow night, but the Pirates win Thursday, it
    	  very well could be young Steve in a losing cause.

    	- If Bonds should get an extra base hit at some point tomorrow
    	  night, does anyone else besides me think he'll be unstoppable 
    	  after finally doing so?

    Go Bucs!

    	--dan'l
3.422AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopTue Oct 15 1991 17:168
    	Sorry but Bonds throw was not good.  He was in very shallow
    left field and there is no way any other catcher could've made the
    play because the throw was to the first base side of the plate and
    got there just before Justice crossed the plate.  I for one think
    Bonds is the MVP in the National League this year, but the throw
    still sipped big time.
    
    				/Don
3.423no score runs no can winSTAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesTue Oct 15 1991 17:308
    >     Does anyone think Avery will pitch tomorrow as well has he did in
    >	  game two?
    
    He very well might, but then one has to ask the question -- will the
    Braves score enough runs to make it not count for naught?
    
    
    py
3.424whoopsy daisyANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYClarence Thomas for PresidentTue Oct 15 1991 18:548
    >Thank goodness baseball is still pure.
    
    It's good to see you publicly confess that you consider plastic
    rugs in keeping with baseball's purity, dan'l.  Also, I look forward
    to your extolling this same purity when the Pirates send in their
    first Designated Geek against the Twins.
    
    MrT(wins Win!)
3.425CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 19:5313
    "T"
    
    At least in baseball they don't stop after every play, even the obvious
    ones, and let some BOZO watch the play 35 times from 35 angles to see
    if it was called correctly.    I'll hate it when the "designated
    horrible defensive players" get to bat in place of the pitchers when
    the games are played in the HHH Metronome, but that's the rules,
    nomatter how assinine they be.
    
    The ManySordid Twinkies will fall in 6!!!take it to the bank.
    
    JaKe
    
3.426Pirates have little to DH withSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadTue Oct 15 1991 20:075
    That brings up an interesting point.  If the Pirates do make it to the
    series, who will be the DH?  MacLendon, Varsho, or Wilkerson I suspect. 
    That's pretty scarey.  If the Braves go, Bream is the easy choice.
    
    	--dan'l
3.427CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bear-sort ofTue Oct 15 1991 21:2311
    QUESTION:::
    
    Jim Leyland asked the league if he could use one roster(from the
    eligible pool) for the NCLS, and alter that roster if the Bucs made the
    World Series(presumably for the purpose of the designated lousy fielder
    or gimpy kneed player).  What did the league say about
    this???Approve-disapprove?????
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.428NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Oct 15 1991 21:3617
    
    Fess up, T.  The baseball atmosphere in Minnesota is as "impure" as it
    gets anywhere in the world.  Dome, turf, baggies, baffles, speakers-- 
    you name it, it's there-- *and* The Geek.  How cain you live with
    yourself?  
    
    On the umpire thing: it's just as much the umpire's responsibility to
    make sure that a player touches all the bases while traversing them 
    as making sure he's missed one.  Let's be honest:  Justice stumbles, 
    stretches out his big toe to just barely brush the bag, if even that 
    (and which *maybe* he felt but no mere human being was going to see), 
    rounds it, STOPS, and looks back, and the umpire is arrogant and 
    incompetent for calling him out?  Hey, you'll see at least one call 
    worse than that almost every time out...
    
    glenn
    
3.429WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Wed Oct 16 1991 04:0816

         It seems we have allot of questions as to if Justice touched the
    bag or not. In a still photograph it looks as if the bag was not
    touched but in a replay there is dust being kicked up. Not much dust
    though mind you. Personally even though I see the dust kick up a little
    bit I still do not see Justice's foot touch the bag. It brings me to
    this....if you were to have dust on the bag and sweep your hand across
    it at the same speed as Justice's foot was crossing the bag you would
    see dust fly. This is just my opinion and other people may differ but
    it may have just been the breeze from his foot causing dust to fly. In
    any case the Umpire was looking right at it and it is his call. It was
    just smart of Pittsburg to appeal at third.

                                                   Night Flier  ~~v~~
                                                
3.430PittsburgHSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadWed Oct 16 1991 10:1611
>    just smart of Pittsburg to appeal at third.
    
    CBS had a great replay angle of Jay Bell trailing Justice and his eyes
    (best I can tell through his sun glasses) are focused right on
    Justice's feet.  Jay Bell is the one who made the appeal.
    
    Think about that for a second.  When you're playing softball and a
    batter hits the ball to the outfield, where are you looking?  Guess
    that's why the dudes in the majors get paid big buccos.
    
    	--dan'l
3.432HumbledSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadWed Oct 16 1991 11:027
    Point well taken, Mark.  My point, however, was that it was hard for me
    to feel sorry for Helms.
    
    Two wrongs don't make a right.  Nor do hundreds.  Let's all be a little
    more sensative, me and T included.
    
    	--dan'l
3.433WAYBAK::LEFEBVREShe talks to angelsWed Oct 16 1991 11:045
    Case closed.
    
    Thanks, Dan'l.
    
    Mark.
3.434glass houses, mud slinging, obscenity & Dan'lANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYClarence Thomas for PresidentWed Oct 16 1991 12:5213
    Speak for yourself, Dan'l.
    
    The single most offensive comment I've ever read in here was your
    distasteful, oppresive, obscene, pornographic, lurid, harrassing,
    embarrassing, humiliating, and unjust equation of AstroTurf with
    baseball purity.
    
    >How cain you live with yourself
    
    Easy, Waugamain: I don't say anything nice about the place, and only
    go there once a year (postseason excepted).
    
    MrT
3.435CAM::WAYParty on, GarthWed Oct 16 1991 13:0518
>    embarrassing, humiliating, and unjust equation of AstroTurf with
>    baseball purity.


I wonder if the inner city youths that Willie Mays used to go play
baseball with after a Giants game ever thought their brand of
baseball any less pure because it was played on asphalt?

If the game brings pleasure, and the smiles, sweat, strain, concentration,
and joy are present in the players, then how is the game not pure?

Is the game not greater than the surface on which it played?  Is the
game not stronger than the attempts to fence it in and dome it?

The only abomination, IMO, to sully the game is the designated hitter.


'Saw
3.436HelpRAVEN1::B_ADAMSIt's about time Richard!Thu Oct 17 1991 00:026
    
    	Anyone got any news for us 2nd shifters?  Last I heard it was 0-0 in
    the 1st in.
    
    
    B.A.
3.437Avery & Drabek both tossing shutoutsRHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 17 1991 01:0710
    re: .-1
    
    The Braves are putting on one of the most enemic offensive displays
    ever seen in the history of playoff baseball.  They've now gone 26
    straight innings without scoring a run!
    
    0 - 0 going into the bottom of the eighth ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.438LUDWIG::GARRYGo IrishThu Oct 17 1991 01:157
    Its 0-0 going to the top of the 9th.
    
    line score thru 8
    
             R  H  E
    Atlanta  0  6  0
    Pitts    0  3  0
3.439Smoltz vs. Smiley for all the marblesCSC32::GL_JOHNSONHipDip skipped a beat.Thu Oct 17 1991 03:3020
3.440Braves bats will come alive tonightSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadThu Oct 17 1991 11:1715
    I just loved that pitchers' duel last night.  What an awesome display
    by two terrific arms.  Hard to believe that Drabek ends up with the L.
    
    I think the Pirates are done.  The team that won the NL East was not
    the team that lost in the ninth last night.  VanSlyke has been in a
    position to win three games and has struck out or grounded out in each
    instance.
    
    I'm teaching class tonight so I'll probably miss the first four innings
    or so.  I fully expect to return home with the Bucs in the hole by
    about five runs.  It's over.
    
    Freakin' Bonds.  Trade the chump tomorrow!
    
    	--dan'l
3.441BSS::JCOTANCHGo Air Force - Stun the Irish!Thu Oct 17 1991 11:3316
    I sat down for about the last 4 innings and saw some exciting baseball.  
    I don't follow baseball that much and am not a fan of either team (I'm
    pulling for the Braves though) but I was on the edge of my seat the last
    couple of innings.  Van Slyke sure extended the drama with all those
    foul balls he hit.  Gant should've caught that lead-off hit in the ninth,
    which looked more like an error.  That double play turned by the Braves 
    in the 6th was a thing of beauty.
    
    I don't think the Braves should've pinch-hit for Avery in the top of
    the 9th.  The guy had given up only 3 hits thru 8 innings and you've
    just broken on top by a run - why take a chance on changing pitchers? 
    Granted, they did have a runner in scoring position but in a tight game
    like this I think they should've left it up to Avery after they got the
    1-run lead.  
    
    Joe
3.442This explains it....BSS::JCOTANCHGo Air Force - Stun the Irish!Thu Oct 17 1991 11:434
    I just read in the paper that Avery told Cox he requested to be
    pinch-hit for because he felt he was losing a little.  
    
    Joe
3.443AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopThu Oct 17 1991 11:498
    	What a magnificent game.  The only downer is that after watching
    the two best teams in baseball battle down to a deciding 7th game,
    the World Series against the "Spamball" champion will be such an
    anticlimactic event.  Although I picked the Braves to win, all I
    can say is bravo to both teams and good luck (although they shouldn't
    need it) to the winner in the Series.
    
    				/Don
3.444CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatThu Oct 17 1991 12:2831
3.445A few points...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadThu Oct 17 1991 12:4415
    - Gotta agree with JaKe on where Buechele was stationed.
    
    - Drabek had struck Gant out, McCarver even said so, but the ump didn't
    give him the call and that ran the count full.  Bummer.
    
    - The strike to VanSlyke looked more like a ball than the
    aforementioned called ball that Drabek threw to Gant.
    
    - Bary Bonds can make up for everything tonight.  I can only hope he
    will.
    
    - Anyone notice the Pirates fans behind the plate last night doing the
    horizontal chop? 
    
    - Pittsburgh is a beautiful city.
3.446CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatThu Oct 17 1991 12:5923
    
    
    >>- Pittsburgh is a beautiful city.
    
    I am decidedly biased, BUT, I think that Pittsburgh at night, with all
    of the lights on, is one of the most beautiful cities I've ever seen.
    
    Anyone who has come into the city from the west at night, and come thru
    the Fort Pitt tunnels has to agree that the view upon exiting the
    tunnels is AWESOME.  Anybody who visits the city, MAKE SURE for the
    BEST view, go to the West End Overlook.
    
    >>- The strike to VanSlyke looked more like a ball than the
    >> aforementioned called ball that Drabek threw to Gant.
    
    I agree, BUT, Whether Van SLyke was fooled on the pitch or not, it was
    a close enuf pitch that Van Slyke should've made an attempt, even if it
    was feeble, at trying to foul the thing off.  It pisses me off to see
    someone watch strike 3 go by, ending the game, with the tying run on 
    third!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.447Great Great Game !!!SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Thu Oct 17 1991 13:3436
 What a great game !!!   Filled with so many tiny events that were
 absolutely titanic in scope.   Baseball at its exquisite finest.
 
 Lonnie Smith slides ever so slightly past second base on a steal attempt
 and is tagged out.    Makes up for it a few innings later with a perfect
 throw to cut down a shocked Don Slaught.
 
 Tim McCarver sets up the situation perfectly by insisting that Gery Redus
 will *not* ground into a double play because a) he hasn't done so all year
 long and b) Avery is throwing high in the strike zone.    
 
 Whap ... grounder to Bream and he and Belliard turn one of the most
 beautiful double plays you will *ever* see.    The 3-6-3 DP is an
 extremely tough one to pull off and those two ex-Pirates did it
 beautifully.   Noticed that McCarver didn't chew any crow on his setup,
 though.  He should have.
 
 Ron Gant steals 2nd in the top of the ninth.   He does *not* score on
 Olson's hit if he had stayed at first.   "Little ball" at its best.
 
 Pena throws his only off-speed toss of the night on the final pitch and
 Van Slyke is totally frozen.  Even Froemming's punch out call was
 off-speed so even the ump was fooled by it.    Beautiful pitch.   What
 pitching is all about.   Work fast, throw strikes, change speeds.
 
 And, Chris, even though the Braves were held scoreless for all those
 innings, they kept plugging.   I remember sitting through the Phillies
 1980 NLCS with Houston.   The Phils went thru an 18 inning drought and I
 must have tossed in a dozen towels in defeat.   Yet they kept on plugging.
 
 Braves are in great shape.   They'll be flying high tonight and the Bucs
 are going to have to regroup a bit.   They gotta be mumbling to
 themselves.   This will easily be the most important and biggest baseball
 game in Atlanta Braves history.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.448CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatThu Oct 17 1991 13:5615
    
>>and is tagged out.    Makes up for it a few innings later with a perfect
>> throw to cut down a shocked Don Slaught.
 
    Another gripe on my part, Slaught was a dead duck at second.  I know
    it's a split second decision on his part, but the ball wasn't really
    the type that you get a doble out of.  The ball was hit hard, and not
    that far to the left of Smith, plus Slaught doesn't have blazing speed.
    
    Belliard had an almost identical hit, and Belliard has good speed,
    later in the game and when he saw Bonds come up with the ballo, he put
    the brakes on BIG TIME.  Slaught, IMHO, should have done the same.
    
    JaKe
    
3.449Pre-programmed decision ???SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Thu Oct 17 1991 14:0415
3.450AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopThu Oct 17 1991 14:267
    	Does anyone remember this kind of banter (questioning baserunning
    decisions and managerial strategies) happening during the SLCS
    (Spamball League Championship Series)?  I mean other than Cito starting
    the SLCS with his third best pitcher (but hey after not making
    decisions all year long it's tough to start).
    
    				/Don
3.451SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Thu Oct 17 1991 14:3745
    
    
    	Great game, but these are not the Pirates I've grown up with who
    were always refered to as "the Lumber Co.".  These guys are more like
    the Slumber Co.!  I've never seen such a pathetic lack of offense
    as the Pirates have shown over these 6 games.  The big 3 B's have 
    pretty much stunk up the joint while the minor B's have picked up
    most of the slack.  I've also never seen so many hitters (Pirates)
    swinging at the first pitch.  Almost every batter does this and 
    ends up being in the hole after 2 pitches..  
    
    	No excuse for Van Slyke watching the last pitch.  Anything close
    and you gotta protect the plate!  Amazing that these guys that are
    making 4 mil a year can't seem to remember basic baseball fundamentals!
    
    	As for the run scoring double, Buchelle(sp) or the managers should
    be hung out to dry.  I played 16 years of organized baseball at 3rd
    base and given the same situation, I would of been standing on top of
    the line!  Give up the hole between short and third because you have
    a great arm in left and the runner might not score on a single in the
    hole.  But if the ball gets down the line, it's a sure double, and
    sure enough, Buchelle was to far off the line!  What's even more
    curious is that the announcers didn't even persue that line of thinking
    after they continually analyze every other play to death.
    
    	Given the situation in the 9th of a close ballgame, I would protect
    the corners to the strong side of the batter.  At least that is what
    I was always taught!  If Bushelle was on the line, Atlanta wouldn't
    of scored and the outcome might of been different.  Bushelle has been
    touted as having a great glove, but all I've seen him do in this 
    series is cost the Pirates two games with mental "errors".
    
    	At this point, I don't even care if the Pirates make it or not.
    This is not the same type of Pirate team I grew up with or identify
    with.  There is no team leader and no offensive power.  That's not
    taking anything away from the Atlanta pitchers because they have
    pitched awfully well, but I think the Pirates are making them all look
    invincible.
    
    	I'm surprised that on one has used the big "C" word yet...but there
    still is time!
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
3.452glimpse at the futureNOVA::SIMONThu Oct 17 1991 14:414
    Hey, at least we know how the Pirates will be in NLCS after Bonds and
    Bonilla eventually leave.  Getting there might be another story, but
    you could have a 50-year old Matty Alou out there and it wouldn't make
    much difference, at least in the offensive categories.
3.453More ...SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Thu Oct 17 1991 14:4928
3.454Bottom line: Gant's steal of 2nd was *HUGE*RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 17 1991 15:2016
    re: Buechele
    
    I cain see both sides to this argument.  Normally you'd definitely be
    guarding the line in the late innings (though some managers no longer
    subscribe to this 'conventional wisdom') but in this case there's a
    runner in scoring position with terrific speed.  It's highly doubtful
    that Bonds is gonna throw out Gant on a single between short and third.
    
    On the other hand Greg Olsen absolutely makes a living pulling the ball
    down the 3rd baseline.  I've seen him do it countless times, and I'd of
    thought the scouting report would show this.  Still, I suspect Leyland
    was 'playing by the book' by NOT guarding the line, since a single is
    most likely gonna score the runner.  
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.455And another beef...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadThu Oct 17 1991 15:255
    Avery pitched a great game, but I got a little tired of both announcers
    gushing over him.  Drabek was doing just as well and I didn't hear half
    the orgasmic compliments they were dribbling on young Steve.
    
    	--dan'l
3.456DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingThu Oct 17 1991 15:4714
I wouldn't BLAM Van Slyke at all for getting caught looking. Pena threw the
perfect pitch at the perfect time. You gotta give whomever called that pitch
some credit. Van Slyke was sitting on and hammering the fastballs (but foul).
There was no way he could recover enough to even try and pull the trigger on
that pitch.....it was a beauty....

Methinks you Buc's fans are a little sensitive after staying up too late last 
night..btw, I'm rooting for the Buc's also...

I just hope we get as good a game tonight as we got last night....


Metz
3.457STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesThu Oct 17 1991 16:4915
    re .455:
    
    > Avery pitched a great game, but I got a little tired of both announcers
    > gushing over him.  Drabek was doing just as well and I didn't hear half
    > the orgasmic compliments they were dribbling on young Steve.
    
    Even as one rooting for the Braves, I have to agree 100% Dan'l.
    
    If Atlanta takes Game 7 it's going to be a house divided at my
    place, as my wife who's originally from "Meffa" will surely be rooting 
    for Pags and the Twins.
    
    
    py
                           
3.458Great baseball...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 17 1991 16:5541
                                                                 
    And they say that ACChris is only a bandwagon baseball fan.  Could have 
    fooled me with that absolutely correct analysis of Buechele's positioning 
    in the ninth.  There is no "book" on guarding the lines with a man on 
    second and *two outs*.  *Any* outfield hit will score Gant; I don't care
    who's out there.  So the decision rests with the batter and the pitch,
    which in this case was a fastball, not a curve.  In his previous
    at-bat, in a similar situation on the same pitch, Olson hit a ground ball 
    to *short* (the play where Bell nailed Gant at the plate).  I really
    can't come to the conclusion that Leyland or Buechele made the wrong
    decision, except of course with the benefit of 20-20 hindsight.
    
    The same thing goes with Van Slyke's strikeout.  It's not like the guy
    just choked on the first two-strike pitch that he saw.  He fouled
    several good fastballs off, most of them hard hit, before Pena just
    absolutely fooled him.  You can't blame the batter there, not after
    that kind of a tough at-bat.  Sure, maybe he could have just waved at 
    the thing and been all the way around on his swing before the ball
    reached the plate, but then today we'd all be saying what a dummy he 
    was for swinging at an unhittable ball that might have been out of the
    strike zone.  You got to give credit where it's due.  That was a
    *great* pitch...
    
    I, too, was surprised that Drabek didn't throw over to first on Gant in
    the ninth.  McCarver kept speculating on the pitchout, but fearing that 
    it would cause Drabek to lose the batter, I didn't like that idea
    (which the Bucs promptly executed anyway, putting Drabek behind 2-0 and
    giving Gant a guaranteed pitch count to steal on).  All he needed to do 
    was to keep him a little honest.  I haven't seen that much of Drabek 
    this season.  Is he one of those guys that has a mortal fear of throwing 
    to the bases or something?
    
    One last thing.  While I won't question his positioning, has Steve
    Buechele *cleanly* fielded a hard-hit ball since he's come over to the
    artificial turf fields of the NL?  Okay, so he looks good with his 
    dives, but can he actually *catch* a ball on the funny stuff without
    backing up on it or otherwise letting the ball play him?  This guy was
    supposedly the top Gold Glove candidate in the AL when he was traded...
    
    glenn
     
3.459CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatThu Oct 17 1991 16:5820
    Over lunch, another flaw in Leyland's "strategic" workings occured to
    me.  It was the ninth inning, Gant was on second with two outs, after
    leading the inning off with a walk and swiping second.
    
    Now, Olsen is batting 7th, right.  For the series to that point, he's
    hitting somewhere around .350, with 3 RBI.  Raphael Belliard, who
    couldn't hit the ball over the fence from 2nd base, and who couldn't
    pull the ball it it was sitting on a batting T, is in deck.  Raphael
    was hitting an anemic .154(which BTW was higher that Barry Bonds'
    avg., and first base was open.
    
    Why the fluffin hay didn't they walk Olsen and set up an "any base"
    force with Belliard up next?????????????????
    
    SAheez, you sit long enuf and think about the game for long enuf, you
    cain find all of the flaws.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.460Manager not always right/wrong cuz something worked/didn't *once*NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 17 1991 17:1622
    
    > Why the fluffin hay didn't they walk Olsen and set up an "any base"
    > force with Belliard up next?????????????????
    
    Probably wouldn't have hurt any, but you wouldn't have seen Belliard. 
    You'd get a pinch-hitter, one (Hunter?) who by the percentages, at
    least, is a better hitter than Olson.  If the Braves' manager is
    content to leave his .240-hitting righthanded catcher out there against
    my righthanded pitcher, I can probably live with that.
    
    I'm not just trying to stick up for Jimmy Leyland at all costs here.  I 
    think he's made some strange decisions that have both worked and
    failed.  Letting Roger Mason hit the other day was pretty bizarre, but
    it worked (barely).  I also thought he should have had Espy in there as
    a pinch-runner when Varsho singled to lead off the inning, had Merced
    looking at a few pitches from the occasionally wild Pena and then had
    Espy stealing.  The way the Bucs were going, that first out in the ninth
    was too valuable to give away without at least a fight from Merced, who 
    has a very good eye, not with speed on the bench, at least...
    
    glenn
      
3.461ACC Chris Knows Baseball!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueThu Oct 17 1991 17:171
    
3.462I like Minny In the seriesQUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderThu Oct 17 1991 17:186
    
     Obviously a sign of a deeply flawed team...!!!...
    
    		GO BRAVES !!
    
    			Big Game
3.463CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatThu Oct 17 1991 17:3119
    Although I PRAY that the Bucs win this thing tonite, even if they lose,
    I feel that, at least for me, this has been one of the most exciting
    LCS's, whether NL or AL, that I've seen in many years.  3 1-0 games and
    a 3-2 game, with a 10-3 shellaquing and a 5-1 Bucco pounding thrown in
    for good measure.
    
    Although I don't expect a high scoring event tonite, it would be nice
    to not have another nail biter and have the Bucs bat around inn the 1st
    inning(wishful thinking).
    
    Wasn't it just a year ago when the Braves fans were saying "Go Braves,
    and take the Falcons with you"????
    
    
    GGGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo
    BBBBBBUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCCCCCCCCSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.464PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonThu Oct 17 1991 17:5020
  I grew up in Pittsburgh and remember Mazeroski's homer to win the 60
  series. I never enjoyed watching a player more than Clemente and he
  certainly lived up to his reputation in the 71 series. In 79, the team
  was tight and adopted the song "We are Family". In all of those years
  they seemed to have something special going for them. Now in 91, the
  Bucs probably have the best talent for one team in all of baseball. But
  at the same time, you have a couple of so-called stars talking about 
  leaving the team at the end of the year and for the most part, the talented 
  stars are not producing. This is in sharp contrast to the leadership of
  people like Clemente and Pops Stargell and the "We are Family" attitude
  of the past. I hope the Bucs pull this one out but something in the back
  of my mind doesn't have the confidence that I had in 60,71 and 79.

  With that said, I think Doug Drabek, Jay Bell(offense and defence) and 
  Zane Smith are rising to the occasion and having a terrific NLCS.

  Go Bucs !! If they win tonight, I just wish the gunner was around to hear him
  say "We had em all the way".

					Keith
3.465CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RThu Oct 17 1991 18:379
	I have to agree with Glenn and Chris that Buechele was positioned
	properly on the Olson double.  As Glenn mentioned, Olson had hit
	that same pitch to the shortstop's left just 2 innings earlier, and
	was much more likely to hit it through the hole than down the line.

	On Drabek's "decision" to not throw to first, what I have heard
	since is that this was the type of move that the hamstring problem
	was preventing him from making smoothly, and comfortably.  Perhaps
	he feared aggravating the problem.
3.466ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYClarence Thomas for PresidentThu Oct 17 1991 18:5013
    If the Aspirates lose tonite (and I hope they don't, cuz we 'Sotans
    up here are licking our chops hungering for Pittsburgh Title-meat
    to sink our teeth into) then they too will be rightfully branded
    chokemasters just like the Blue Jays.
    
    If this comes to pass, then why not a ChokeBowl between Pitssburugh
    and Toronto?  Be kinda like those consolation games they used to have
    at the Final Four.
    
    Reason?  So one a them could finally learn how to win a Final, albeit
    a penultimate one...
    
    MrT(wins!)
3.467PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Thu Oct 17 1991 19:1412
    "T(winkiesonthebrain)", 
    
    go wait in the truck!!!
    
    I don't see where the "C" word can be used for either team in the NLCS,
    regardless of who wins.  
    
    Throw out the 5-1 and 10-3 games and both teams have scored only 4
    runs each in the other 4 games.  Pitching has prevailed in the series,
    not lay down and die type baseball like the Blown-Jays played.
    
    JaKe
3.468Sure, it'd be a choke, but that's not what 'Sotans see...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 17 1991 19:2537
   >  If the Aspirates lose tonite (and I hope they don't, cuz we 'Sotans
   >  up here are licking our chops hungering for Pittsburgh Title-meat
   >  to sink our teeth into
    
    Ha!  From today's USelessA (tm) Today:
    
    "On the way out of Minnesota last week, the taxi driver was musing
    about the prospects of his Twins being in the World Series, and who
    they might face.
       
    Even though there were only two possibilities, he spoke of his
    choice with great conviction.
    
    'Anybody but Pittsburgh,' he said.  'Nobody in Minnesota wants to
    see Pittsburgh again.'"
    
    (Seems that not *all* Minnesotans share the optimism of this one 
    transplanted hypocrite.)
     
    > If this comes to pass, then why not a ChokeBowl between Pitssburugh
    > and Toronto?  Be kinda like those consolation games they used to have
    > at the Final Four.
    
    > Reason?  So one a them could finally learn how to win a Final, albeit
    > a penultimate one...
    
    You better hope this transpires for the Twins' sake, what with the 
    Pirates' outstanding record for coming through in the clutch in the 
    "Finals" of 1960, 1971, and 1979 (underdog teams all, no less...).
    
    MrT, how do you reconcile your current fanaticism for the Twins with
    all of the crap you've been dumping on the woeful "Twinkies" of the 
    past few years?  Who's next in line, the Golden Goofs? 
    
    glenn
            
3.469AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopThu Oct 17 1991 19:285
    	MorT, the National League Champion is going the wipe the floor
    of the HubertHoratioHornblowerDome with the Spamball chumps.  To
    bad you wasn't a bettin' main.
    
    				/Don
3.470CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEFri Oct 18 1991 08:549
    Wow, love them Braves!!!  They are my current favorite team, tied for
    first with them Twins!
    
    Go Braves.  Go Twins.  
    
    
    :*)
    
    Lee
3.471When do the hockey playoffs begin...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadFri Oct 18 1991 09:4526
    Well, it's over.  What can you say?  Am I disappointed?  Yes, but not
    as much as I thought I would be and I think that has something to do
    with spending the past week engrossed in perhaps the greatest LCS in a
    long long time.  What great baseball.  After this, the WS is bound to
    be anticlimactic.  And I'm happy for the people of Atlanta.

    Bonilla is through as a Pirate.  It is my opinion that the Pirates
    should wait to see who Bonilla goes to and send Bonds to the same team
    in a trade for players who have conviction.  It would be ashame to
    split the choke brothers up.  What was that Bonds said at the beginning
    of the summer when the front office wouldn't increase the offer to
    Bonnilla: "If they want a championship in Pittsburgh, they're going to
    have to pay for it."
    
    The Pirates could be back in the playoffs next year if they still had
    Wes Chamberlin to take Bonilla's place.  Thanks, Larry Doughty.

    Frankly, I'd like to see a VanSlyke-led team finish 4th in the division
    next season than to put up with Bonds for one more year.  He doesn't
    deserve the good people of Pittsburgh and I bet there are many waking
    up there this morning saying just that.  

    With all the free agents, you won't even recognize the men in Pirate
    uniforms next year unless you've recently seen the Buffalo Bisons play.

    	--dan'l
3.472I may even watch some of the WS nowMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 18 1991 10:399
    Well I dont watch much baseball, I watched 2 games, game 5 when the
    Braves missed the 3rd base bag (more or less giving Pitt the win) and
    them last nights game, I watch to the bitter end.  How about that
    rookie hunter.......Loved his double pumping fists on that RBI double.
    
    Go Braves and Take the Falcons with you...Maybe them meant Go to the
    World Series Braves and take the Falcons to the SuperBowl with you :-)
    
    
3.473Go Bonds Go, and take Bonilla wif yaCTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSFri Oct 18 1991 10:4514
    Van Slyke bit the bullet and admitted the Pirates have plenty to answer
    for over the winter. He in effect admitted that the Pirates as a team
    simplty have underachieved the past two years. And dan'l, you're
    correct. Bonilla and Bonds just might not git all the money from other
    clubs that they are lookin' fer.
    Got to gave the Braves' pitching credit. Two shutouts in Pittsburgh.
    Wish we had Avery and Smoltz.
    
    Did I see/hear correctly? Were there quite a few no shows at Trois
    Rivieres?  Quite a loud Brave contingent in the upper deck in right
    field.
    
    MikeL
    
3.474Some (weak) explanations...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadFri Oct 18 1991 10:5823
    They weren't no shows.  The game wasn't sold out.  A chance to see your
    home team take the pennant and there's not a sell out?  Unbelievable.
    
    Course, maybe these few thousand were just fed up with paying Bonds'
    sallary and having him grasp throat, open mouth, and insert finger.
    
    Talked to my dad over the weekend and he said that the city of
    Pittsburgh is taking some big heat for the way it treated the fans. 
    This mainly stems from parking fiascos.  TRS used to have adequate (at
    best) parking.  This season, they took away about 5,000 spaces to build
    a science center on the river.  
    
    Well, during the first two game sellouts, there was a great lack of
    spaces and people began parking anywhere and everywhere.  Instead of
    just letting a tense situation be, during the first two games, the city
    of Pittsburgh towed over 200 cars.
    
    Way to go, mayor Sophie.  Everyone pisses and moans about the low
    attendance and then when you get a great crowd you treat them like
    crap.  Doubt if I'd have gone to last night's game either fearing my
    car would end up in the city impound.
    
    	--dan'l
3.475disappointing, damaging, sickening, revulsiveANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYClarence Thomas for PresidentFri Oct 18 1991 12:0318
    So now it's the Mayor's fault?  
    
    I suspected all along that the alleged snafu surrounding last 
    year's empty seats was a Trick Dick Nixon-style cover story, and
    now I know it.
    
    As a Americain I am ashamed for our National Pasttime.  As a baseball
    fan I am angry.  There was talk a few years ago about getting baseball
    out of Pittsburgh, and I wonder whether Fay Vincent, staring in shock
    at all those empty seats at a NLCS game seven, rues the decision to
    save the Pittsburgh Pirates.  
    
    It's time to face up to the fack that Pittsburgh is not a quality 
    baseball town and to get the franchise moved to a more deserving city,
    such as Indianapolis or Charlotte or Salt Lake or Portland or wherever -
    anywhere but Pittsburgh.
    
    MrT
3.476Gotta admit, I was *shocked*RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Oct 18 1991 12:2410
    I know I've spoken out against high ticket prices and management
    ineptitude in the past in order to support fans staying away away from
    the ballpark, but to fail to sellout the 7th game of the playoffs (when
    other games *HAD* sold out) is pathetic.
    
    It's almost as if the fans gave up on the Pirates after the 6th game
    ...
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.477PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Fri Oct 18 1991 12:3251
    >><<< Note 3.475 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Clarence Thomas for President" >>>
    >>           -< disappointing, damaging, sickening, revulsive >-
    
    And that's just when you look in the mirror each morning!!!  (8^/\*
    
    Re  Pgh not a good baseball town.  Propel it through your southern end,
    "T".  2mil + attendance.
    
    Although, when CBS first came on lasted night, I couldn't believe the
    empty seats.  Here I am in Colorado for the4 lasted 4 weeks, not a
    chance of going to see ANY of the playoff games, and there's a bunch of
    empty seats at 3 Rivers.
    
    Got tired of Jack Buck and Tim McCarver lasted night.  Every time
    Bonilla's face popoped up on the tube, Buck tries to get melodramatic
    and spews,"Could this be Bonilla's last game as a Pirate?".  Musta
    heard it 10 times lasted night.  
    
    Also got tired of seeing hunter's HR from every angle except thru
    Smiley's a$$hole, where CBS would've had a camera if they could've put
    it there.
    
    Re somewhere back in thiis note, Zane Smith is truly the starting
    pitcher for the all-ugly team, and Brian Hunter, IMHO, wins the
    starting job at first.
    
    Lessee, Braves .vs.  Twinkies in the WORLD SERIES.  Hah, I couldn't
    give 2 SLOF's who wins this thing, although I would rather that the
    Braves do, cause they're the only good team in the Series.
    
    Doubt seriously if I'll get to see a game of the series, or really want
    to see one.
    
    The Bucs "big 3" set the tone early lasted night, when both Orlando
    Merced and Jay Bell got on in the bottom of the first.  Andy Van Slyke
    had the best shot of the nexted three, and was out on a ball that
    looked gone off of the bat.  Bonilla and Bonds feebly ended the first
    inning.
    
    Those three, Slyke, Bonilla and Bonds batted .333 in the NLCS with
    nobody on base, but when it counted, and there were runs to be driven
    in, they batted a horrendous .077.
        
    Ah well, now to watching the Steelers fumble up and down the field, and
    watching the Penguins repeat as Stanley Cup champs.
    
    dissapointedly
    
    JaKe
    
    
3.478Atlanta fans in Three RiversSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Fri Oct 18 1991 12:4725
3.479PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Fri Oct 18 1991 13:1674
    I can't help but wonder what affect the empty seats at Three River may
    have had on the Pirate players lasted night.
    
    Biggest game, in way of importance, of the year.  Win you go to the big
    show, lose, and the best Pirate team in the lasted 11 years is but a
    memory, forever.  And the fans fail to show.  
    
    The Pirates left port lasted night but forgot to put the sails on the
    boat.  I can't help but think of the unused potential this team brought
    to the NLCS. They had Gold loves in left field and center field.  They
    wore the label as the best defensive outfield in the NL, if not the
    whole game.  Their outfielders combined for 300 RBI this year, but
    couldn't put any that meant much across in the NLCS.
    
    Some will say the Pirates choked, others will say they just met up with
    terrific pitching.  Personally, I say it was a combination of the two.
    
    Barry Bonds ends the season second in the NL in RBI, but can't put a
    SINGLE rbi to his credit in the NLCS.  In the first, with two outs and
    runners on first and third, he fails.  Later, with nobody on, he slams
    a ball into the left field corner for a double.  Oh, but for that hit
    coming in the 1st inning.  
    
    The whole complection of the game was set when the Bucs left those two
    leadoff hits go to waste in the first.  The never threatened
    afterwards.
    
    John Smoltz pitched a good game.  He had a crutch there, his
    "PERSONAL" psychologist.   How Thweet!!
    
    Can't help but wonder if Barry Bonds has his personal Proctologist
    attend every NLCS game, he hits like such an a$$hole.
    
    I feel disappointed this AM, but also angry that the team that was the
    best in the Majors this year during the regualr season, can only score
    12 runs in 7 games, and had so many hitters going for the fences
    instead of just trying to hit the freakin ball.
    
    I'd say, "Wait til nexted year", BUT, this was the lasted chance for
    this "team".  This winter, the team will be decimated by free agency,
    and, as --dan'l wrote earlier, they MAY finish fourth nexted year.
    
    Larry Doughty, Bucs GM, let a couple of prime prospects get away, some
    to satisfy the present, and others thru assinine mistakes.  
    
    The Pirates don't have the revenue to pay the BIG bucks.  The market
    they are in is too small.  There are no multi-million dollar TV deals
    like the NY and LA teams worked out.   Fielding a mediocre team will
    only hasten teh removal of baseball from Pittsburgh.  Ah well, at
    least maybe they'll end up with a minor league team a few years after
    the BUcs leave.  Not saying that the BUCS wil leave for sure, but
    without remaining a contender, and exciting team, and without some sort
    of revenue sharing thruout the league, the BUCS will not be able to
    survive financially over the nexted few years, and will sell to new
    owners, and move to a larger market.
    
    There was talk on ESPN that Bonilla could be baseball's first "SIX
    MILLION DOLLAR MAN".  Salaries for playing a FREAKIN GAME are getting
    tottally out of hand, IMHO.  No wonder it costs so freakin much for a
    family to go to a game.  Food and beverages, plus souvenirs are priced
    sky high, 'cause the team takes a cut out of each, and must pay the
    huge salaries if they wish to remain competitive.
                                                               
    Not to say it's the players' fault either, it's a combination of both
    the management and the players.  Greed, Greed, Greed.
    
    I ask, is anybody really worth 4 million, 5 million, or more PER year
    fro playing a GAME, just a freaking GAME.  But I guess that's
    entertainment.
    
    Enuf for now
    
    JaKe
    
3.480PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFSave Waldo CanyonFri Oct 18 1991 13:2710
  Jake, I feel exactly like you do. I remember when you could get a seat
  in the left field bleachers at Forbes field for 50 cents and watch player's
  like Mazeroski, Clemente, Smokey Burgess etc. and you would never hear
  a complaint about their salaries.

  I would be a real shame if the Pirates left Pittsburgh. They've been there
  for what, 80 years or so, and have one of the best baseball histories in the
  game. 

				Keith
3.482Ticket money doesn't come close to paying the salariesCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 18 1991 13:394
3.483RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOHelp, Set Lee's ProfileFri Oct 18 1991 14:0417
    Mac -
    
    I understand your arguement - but I do feel that salaries are way out
    of hand.  There's as much talk about salaries and free agency and
    collusion and agents and demands are there is about fungo's and hitting
    and pitching and fielding.
    
    I wish baseball would have a salary cap or something.  
    
    And what happens if CBS, which LOST a ton of money on the contract,
    doesn't sign back up for the big bucks?  Do the players lower demands?
    Not in my lifetime.  
    
    But, there will be no end.  I won't be long til the 10 million dollar
    contract (yearly...
    
    JD
3.484CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 14:0471
    IMHO, salaries on the Major leagues should be on a scale.
    
    Set up a base pay of say, $250k for a first year player.
    2nd year player $350k, 3rd year 450K, ans so on.
    
    Then add the incentives.  Hit 5 homers, get an extra $50k.
    10 homers, $100K, etc.  
    Less than 5 errors, extra bucks, make the defensive scale go on
    chances/errors made percentage.
    
    Hit over .250, extra bucks scaled up all the way to winning the batting
    title.
    
    Money for RBI's, money for pitchers wins, saves, etc.
    
    Then, when a palyer has a good year, he gets paid for having a good
    year, when he has a bad year, he doesn't still get paid for failures.
    
    Now, I can see all of the arguments from younzes, Windfall profits for
    the owners, blah blah blah.
    
    The owners would be permnitted a certain profit margin, with the rest
    of the money going to either pension fund or a new "get a real life, do
    something worthwhile with your life" re-education plan which would help
    the players who can't count as high as their salaries, or tie their own
    shoes, learn a "valuable" skill, like basketweaving, to keep them from
    starving for the rest of their lives.
    
    I guess I'm sounding bitter, well I guess I am bitter.
    
    I'm just tired of the way sports has gravitated from what was once
    "fun" to nothing but chasing the almighty dollar.  I'm bitter about the
    fact that if I want to go to a game, and take my family, I gotta shell
    out a major portion of a days wages for tickets, parking, food,
    souvenirs for the younguns, etc.  And who do I get to watch????
    A bunch of players, who were gifted with some athletic ability, and a
    few breaks in life, who are making mor in a week than I can ever hope
    to make in 2 or 3 years, PLAYING A GAME!!!!
    
    And what'll they do this winter, charge money for their autographs,
    like they really need the dough.  The owners will raise ticket prices
    again, bleed the f#$%ing public, cause they have to pay the exhorbitant
    salaries, etc.
    
    CBS shells out over a billion dollars for baseball, and they're losing
    their shirts on the deal.  The NLCS and ALCS ratings were sewage.  And
    you know what, I feell sort of glad that the ratings are shit.  There's
    a helluva lot more things I can spend my money on that are more
    worthwhile than watching sports at the ballpark.  There are people
    starving in this country because they're out of work and can't find a
    job, but the professional athlete thinks he's so important, he's worht
    millions of dollars per year.
    
    Don't get me wrong, if I were in the league, I'd go after all the
    money I could get to make myself financially independent for life, but 
    I just get tired of hearing how much these bozos are making for playing
    a game when there are som many other problems in the world that are
    worthwhile.
                             
    When pro sports eventually goes exclusively pay per view, then my
    watching of sports will be finished.
    
    I have in the past, had season tickets to the Pitt Panthers football
    games, and will be buying them again nexted year, at least there, I'm
    not seeing athletes whose minds are cluttered thinking about the
    salaries they're receiving, YET!!
    
    Peaved
    
    JaKe
    
3.485CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEFri Oct 18 1991 14:1727
    Hail, I can remember when ballplayers had off-season jobs!  Selling
    cars, beer, etc.
    
    Know what?  There was an incentive back then for players to win the
    pennant and WS.  It was called MONEY!  LOTS of MONEY, compared to what
    their salaries were.  Which were still pretty good compared to the
    working man.
    
    Nowadays, it's basically loose change for many players.
    
    What really bugs me is that I have no say in this unbelievable
    escalation of salaries in sports.  It doesn't matter if I watch or
    listen to the game, or attend.  The dough is offered by TV and radio
    stations.  They, in turn, charge their sponsors, who are only to happy
    to have a spot during a game.  They, in turn, whack us, the poor
    consumer who may or may not know what the hell the tomahawk chop is.
    
    That's what bugs me, Bunky.  Now, it's been described as entertainment. 
    But, I can elect to either go to a concert or movie if I wish.  Or, to
    buy a CD or tape.  I have some control of where my dough goes to.  
    
    But, unless I do watch in order to determine which products to boycott,
    how will I know which ones they are?
    
    I've been had, and it ain't gonna stop.
    
    Lee
3.486It'll be nickel beer night again!CTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSFri Oct 18 1991 14:2811
    Luvs it Bob,
    My new amour,the Cleveland Indians vs PeeWee's Expos in the Series.
    I cain see it now.
    80,000 screamin' Cleveland maroons on a cold October night in the
    Mistake by the Lake. But only 2000 of 'em are Chop, Choppin' away
    and chantin'. Da rest are all dressed in brown,wif' dog masks on
    throwin' bones at dem Expos and woofin'. They think the Brownies
    are playin'! Great baseball town that Cleveland is.
    
    Mikel
    
3.487maybe the Braves were just hungrierSTAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesFri Oct 18 1991 14:2916
    Was it all that long ago that the late Lyman Bostock offered to take a
    cut in his next season's salary, following what he felt was an off-year?
    
    re Lee:
    
    > Know what?  There was an incentive back then for players to win the
    > pennant and WS.  It was called MONEY!  LOTS of MONEY, compared to what
    > their salaries were.  Which were still pretty good compared to the
    > working man.
    
    For a Steve Avery or a Brian Hunter who's making the major league
    minimum, the World Series purse *is* going to almost equal their
    salaries.  Perhaps that was the difference... 
    
    
    py
3.488CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 14:3421
    I only made it to a couple of Pirate games this year, but that was
    mostly because I work evenings now and can't justify taking a day off
    to go see baseball, much.
    
    I will, hosever, take a day off once in a while to take my family to a
    game, BUT, only on a Wednesday night when the Bucs have what is called
    "Family Buck Night".  I get parking for a buck, gen. admission for a
    buck, a hot dog for a buck and a coke for a buck.  That's $13(souvenirs
    not included) for me and the wife, and our 2 older children(8 and 5 yrs
    old) to see the game.  The kids mainly want to watch teh Pirate Parrot,
    but my daughter, 8, likes to watch the game, too.
    
    Now $13 ain't too bad, but if I wanted box seats, the price jumps to
    $57.  Take away the Buc night promotion and we're talking $85 or more.
    Hell, I cain take the kids to a movie and "Chuck E. Cheese's" 3 or 4
    times for that kind of money.
    
    So for me and my fmaily, it's "Buck Night" or not at all.
    
    JaKe
    
3.489SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Fri Oct 18 1991 14:3444
    
    	Getting back to the subject at hand...
    
    	Congrats to the Braves..they deserved it.  They took 3-4 in the
    Pirates home park which is quite amazing.
    
    	As for the Pirates, if no one else will say it, I will...CHOKE
    They had the best record in baseball, had 2, count em 2 MVP candidates,
    an ex-Cy Young'er, a legit Cy Young candidate and they end up being
    shut out 3 times in 7 games.  Pathetic..
    
    	For the money, anyone can have Bonds or Bonilla.  Bonilla and Bonds
    have tried to hold the Pirates hostage for a couple of years now by
    holding this "or else" mentality over the organization.  As far as I
    am concerned, they aren't worth the hassle.  Over the last 2 years 
    when the money was on the line, neither produced much more than a
    pile of sunflower shells.
    
    	As I said yesterday, this is not the Pirates I once knew, loved,
    and emulated.  This team has no clubhouse leader like a Stargell or
    Clemente.  This team had/has no identity.
    
    	As for the non-sellout last night, the Pittsburgh Post Gazette
    said it all on Thursday when they said that Atlanta had (already)
    won the best of 7 series.  One thing Pittsburgh fans aren't and that
    is dumb.  This series was over after game 6.  Actually, I'm glad 
    a lot of the folks didn't waste 40 bucks to see this sorry bunch.  
    
    	True, the city isn't a great baseball town, but then again, they
    aren't a bad baseball town either.  Pittsburgh people will rally behind
    anyone they feel is giving their all.  I simply don't think the
    people of the city feel that close to this current group of players
    especially Bonds and Bonilla.  The folks of Pittsburgh have many fond
    memories of the older players that extended themselves in the field
    and around the city.  Few if any of the older crew, ever moaned
    and groaned about pay and threatened to leave.  These things simply
    don't sit well with the people of Pittsburgh.  Most have worked pretty
    damn hard to make ends meet and they expect nothing less from the
    pro athletes that represent the city.  If they feel they are being
    taken, they will let you know, and that's pretty much what they did
    last night IMO.
    
    
    							bill..g.
3.490CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 14:5131
3.491CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 18 1991 14:5513
    People complained when Babe Ruth was getting paid big bucks (remember
    his line about having a better year than the president?).  Nothing's
    changed.
    
    Although baseball is probably the most individual of the team sports, I
    think it would be pretty tough to set up a salary scale based on what
    Jake suggests.  A pitcher might have a 1.57 ERA but be 12-8 because he
    has a poor defense and an anemic offense behind him.  A player could be
    batting over 300 but have a handful of RBI's because the guys in front
    of him aren't doing their jobs.  It also puts a lot of pressure on the
    manager when it comes to things like pulling a pitcher going for his
    xth shutout or benching a player in a slump who's going for his yth
    RBI.
3.492CAM::WAYParty on, GarthFri Oct 18 1991 14:5624
1960 must've been a GREAT year to be a Pirate fan.

I'll be that 7th game of the Series was a doozy!

What was it, something like 9-9 in the bottom of the 9th, when Maz
hit what had to be one of the greatest all time homers that game has
ever seen.


What kid hasn't fantasicize this, when playing sandlot ball:

	World Series, 7th game, bottom of the 9th.
	Men on first and second with 2 outs.
	The count is 1-2, the visitors lead by one....

My brother and I would do that endless hours in the neighborhood.

If you were in the field, you made that great leaping catch at the
wall to save the game.....


"Memories, light the corners of my mind"

'Saw
3.493CAM::WAYParty on, GarthFri Oct 18 1991 14:5932
>    Although baseball is probably the most individual of the team sports, I
>    think it would be pretty tough to set up a salary scale based on what
>    Jake suggests.  A pitcher might have a 1.57 ERA but be 12-8 because he
>    has a poor defense and an anemic offense behind him.  A player could be
>    batting over 300 but have a handful of RBI's because the guys in front
>    of him aren't doing their jobs.  It also puts a lot of pressure on the
>    manager when it comes to things like pulling a pitcher going for his
>    xth shutout or benching a player in a slump who's going for his yth
>    RBI.


They ought to do it like they do here at DEC.


Make you write up a bunch of bullshit on how you felt you did in the
last year, write up there own bunch of bullshit, which is obviously
better bullshit than yours because they're getting paid more than
you.

Then they tell you that your bullshit is bullshit, while theirs is
right.

Then they make you have a woodie will they give you a little raise.
You sit there and smile like they're so benevolent, then you leave
the room saying "Cheap ass bastard".

Everybody else goes through the same thing, but you can't tell anyone
else what you make.


hell, if baseball did that, it'd probably still cost .50 to go to a game....

3.494RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOHelp, Set Lee's ProfileFri Oct 18 1991 15:008
    Looking at Bonds (and to some extent Bonilla), the Mets' fan in me knew
    what the Buc fan was going through.  I saw "Darryl" written all over
    their play.  Ship them to L.A., where they love that type.  Great
    talent, no doubt.  No heart, however.
    
    Yep, I saw a little Strawberry in Barry Bonds...
    
    JD
3.495ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Oct 18 1991 15:0412
    >I only made it to a couple of Pirate games this year...
    
    Typical Pirates "fan."  This is why the franchise must be moved to a
    baseball town - for the good a the game, for its honor.  Last night
    was a mortifying embarrassment.  Not only the thousands a empty seats
    for the NLCS' game 7, but the fack that the stadium was half empty as
    the Pirates batted in the 9th.
    
    Hey, git a clue you low quality Pittsburgh baseball "fans": This ain't
    football, they have no clock in baseball!
    
    MrT
3.496Yankees battle Confederates in 1800's rematch!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Oct 18 1991 15:1114
    Although this didn't receive any publicity on CBS (surprise!) there
    were mucho problems in the stands last night at 3 Rivers.  Seems all the
    Braves fans that poured in were not too appreciated by the Pittsburgh
    attendees.  With defeat staring them in the face and the Atlanta fans
    seemingly rubbing it in their faces with the tomahawks and war chant,
    they headed up into the stands to try_an shut 'em up.
    
    IMO the wound that hurt these overly emotional (not to mention
    intoxicated) Pirate fans wasn't the pro-Atlanta cheering, but the fack 
    that so many were able to git tickets and attend the game in the
    first place!
    
    
    - ACC Chris
3.497CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 15:1724
    
    >>                         <<< Note 3.495 by ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSY "Plato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnight" >>>

    >>>I only made it to a couple of Pirate games this year...
    
   >> Typical Pirates "fan."  This is why the franchise must be moved to a
   >> baseball town - for the good a the game, for its honor.  Last night
    
    
    Get the whole freaking context from the original note,
    Twinkiesupthedirtshute.
    
    Precisely how many verifiable Twinkies game did you attned this year,
    that YOU PAID for???????
    
    20, 30, 40?????
    
    I agree that lasted night's attendance was an abomination, but I
    haven't done my investigation yet as to the why's and how's.
    
    Full report in a month or twenty.
    
    JaKe
    
3.498CSC32::SALZERFri Oct 18 1991 15:2313
    This summer I watched a lot of baseball and without question game 6
    was about the finest performance I've seen this season. Atlanta 
    has had opportunity after opportunity to fall to the wayside late
    but they haven't.  We waited for their collapse after the Nixon
    bust and they didn't. We waited for them to fold in the heat racing
    with the Dodgers and they didn't do that either. Then faced with
    winning 2 of 2 in Pittsburgh and fight their way out of a terrible
    hitting and scoring slump, many had them written off. The Braves
    then preceeded to shut them out in 2 straight. I don't believe
    there's enough water in all the lakes of Minnesota to cool these
    boys down. That bunch is hot right now.  
    
    BoB
3.499Bye BeesGRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Fri Oct 18 1991 15:2813
    As a lifelong Pirate Fan, I say...
    
    Bye Bye Bobby
    Bye Bye Barry
    
    Who is in Buffalo?
    
    I can't put up with Bonilla's greediness or Bond's attitude.  Not if
    they can't back up their demands with action.  Enough is enough.  Bonds
    may be Dave Parker all over again.  Bonilla just ain't that great. 
    Bobby Bo... no defense, slightly above average hitter.
    
    Rick
3.500CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 15:3513
    
    >>they can't back up their demands with action.  Enough is enough.  Bonds
    >>may be Dave Parker all over again.  Bonilla just ain't that great. 
    
    I disagree, Parker contributed to the 1979 World Champ team during the
    playoffs and in the WS, Bonds hasn't contributed as much as a wooden
    nickle.  
    
    On the other hand, Bonds hasn't tried to snort up the foul lines,m
    either, YET!!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.501I just don't care about the Pirates much anymoreSHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadFri Oct 18 1991 15:4111
    Compare these two quotes on free agency and tell me who has heart:
    
    "If they want a championship in Pittsburgh, they're going to have to
    pay for it." 
    
    	Barry Bonds
    
    "If you transplant a tree, you might damage the roots."
    
    	Willie Stargell
    
3.502CAM::WAYParty on, GarthFri Oct 18 1991 15:455
dan'l  --


You couldn't have picked a better illustration of the demise of 
baseball in the last twenty years.....
3.503Missed by 2/3 of a inningSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Fri Oct 18 1991 15:5623
 File this one under "some things never change" ...
 
 Read in yesterday's paper that the Reds refused to pay Jose Rijo a
 performance incentive bonus of $62,500.    Rijo's contract stated that he
 would receive the extra dough if he pitched 205 innings or more.
 
 Rijo finished the year with 204 and 1/3 innings pitched.    He missed
 quite a few starts with a mid-season ankle injury, too.    But Schott
 stiffed him anyway.
 
 According to the Black Sox legend, Charlie Comiskey stiffed Eddie Cicotte
 out of a $10,000 bonus because he won *only* 29 games instead of 30.  
 Cicotte went on, of course, to lose 2 games to the Reds in the tainted
 1919 Series.
 
 Yes, you can make the argument that neither player reached their
 agreed-upon goal and shouldn't have been paid no matter how close they
 came to it for whatever reason.
 
 But, is it any wonder that ballplayers look to leave town on the firsted
 train out ???
 
 Bob Hunt
3.504CAM::WAYParty on, GarthFri Oct 18 1991 16:1011
While it's JMHO, smart management would say:


	Okay Jose, you missed it by 2/3 of an inning.  Well give you
	the bonus, but we'll take off a commensurate amount.

Player is happy, you've given him what he's earned, and next season he
feels like he can trust you, and he goes out and gives it his all...

But again, JMHO,
'Saw
3.505HERIAM::CORBETTDo you think people will ever learn?Fri Oct 18 1991 16:1210
                                                               
 >   Not to say it's the players' fault either, it's a combination of both
 >   the management and the players.  Greed, Greed, Greed.
    

	It's not the fault of management or the players its societies fault.  
We, through tickets, souvenirs, cable, and  buying sponsors products
pay these salaries.  We give the money to the entertainment industry.  

Mike
3.506CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 18 1991 16:419
3.5078^)CAM::WAYParty on, GarthFri Oct 18 1991 16:4612
Okay, I'll put it in terms you can understand then:


	Willie Stargell -- Rugby Union

	Bobby Bonds	-- Rugby League


Catch my drift?

Sure, I knew ya would,
'Saw
3.508ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Oct 18 1991 16:4728
    >but I haven't done my invesitigation yet as to the why's [sic] and 
    >how's [sic].
    
    Shouldn't this read "but I haven't cooked up my shameless spin-control
    job yet," wouldn't that be more, er, intellectually honest?!
    
    Why investigate at all, RaKe?  Why not just belly up to reality and 
    admit that these thousands a seats were empty cuz Pittsburghians just
    didn't care, that the town just isn't a baseball town worth a damn.
    
    re: Rick
    
    I agree.  The Braves' three starters look like maybe the best group
    going into a Series since the days of Koufax and Drysdale. 
    
    The Twins, on paper mind you, look stronger on offense, somewhat 
    stronger on defense (the Twins are a excellent D team with no holes,
    the Braves have some fine defenders [Pendleton] but a hole or two)...
    
    I think the Twins have better relievers BUT the Braves the stronger
    starters, much stronger.  And, in a 7 game Title series 3 guys cain
    wreak a lotta damage.  Just think back to what Orel Hershisher and Co.
    did to the A's!
    
    People in Minnesota think the Series will go the full 7 with the Twins
    prevailing cuz a the homefield advantage...
    
    MrT(wins win!)
3.509CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 16:499
    
    Mac;
    you're right but I'd lay money that it won't last long cause the
    general pubic will sooner or later, and I'd say sooner, get fed up with
    it and turn their back on baseball.  Not everybocy, but a major amount
    of the heretofore "faithful".
    
    JaKe
    
3.510AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopFri Oct 18 1991 16:579
3.511I'll take that betSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Fri Oct 18 1991 16:5917
3.512CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatFri Oct 18 1991 17:1443
    
    >>Why investigate at all, RaKe?  Why not just belly up to reality and 
    >>admit that these thousands a seats were empty cuz Pittsburghians just
    >>didn't care, that the town just isn't a baseball town worth a damn.
    
    T, I must admit that the first part of your statement is possibly true.
    It appals me that the stadium only had 47k in it lasted night, and I
    hold true to my contention that that affected the Pirate players.
    
    As per you sewage that Pgh isn't worht a damn as a baseball town,
    bullsh!t.  Pittsburgh is a town rich inn baseball tradition, spanning
    back to the 1800's.  Who played in the first World Series, I aks
    you????  Pittsburgh .vs. Boston. The Pirates have had some of the best
    players of all time play for them, Clemente, Mazeroski, Stargell, Honus
    Wagner, Paul and Lloyd Waner, and many more whose names elude me right
    now.  If Pgh was so horrible as a baseball town, why did they set club
    attendance records in each of the lasted 2 years?????The club had never
    drawn 2 mil in their history and now they've done it 2 years straight.
    Sure, a few years back they only dres 700k+, but the team was LOADED
    with a bunch of deadweight who couldn't have beat a team of corpses.
    Buys like George"I don't run out ground balls"Hendricks, Steve Kemp,
    Sammy Khalifa, and a host of others who were barely class "A" minor
    league material.  Why drop $30 for the night when you could pay $.25
    the nexted day for the paper and read about the LOSS.  People got tired
    of Chuck "dipshit" Tanner's attitude, "oh well, that's the breaks".
    They won the '79 World Championship in spite op Tanner, not because of
    him.
    
    Baseball was in Pittsburgh long before youse Minny-sodains even knew
    how to walk upright.  But the fans will turn out in droves to the
    Hubert's House of Heifers Metrognome so's they cain show off their
    Beamers in the parking lot, eat tons of Brie and sushi, and drink
    expensive crappy tasting wine, along with their freinds, Muffy and
    Biff,  and they'll just generally YUP OUT!!
    
    I don't know what kept the people away from lasted night's game, but if
    I had been in the 'burgh, I woulda been there.  I know now that there's
    many people who are glad they didn't drop the $40 to see the shitty
    excuse for a basebnall game the Bucs pretended to play lasted night.
    
    JaKe
    
    
3.513Weekend!SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadFri Oct 18 1991 17:2512
    JaKe, weren't you walking out of the classroom about an hour ago?
    
    T's even made you log on longer than you have to.  Get home and when
    you come out of the tunnel tonight, say a little "hello" for ol' dan'l.  
    
    Believe it or not, I'm off to Atlanta tonight.  Going swimming with a
    girl I hardly know down there.  Wonder how many laps I can do in that
    hotel room jacuzee.  Should be fun.
    
    See yunz.
    
    	--dan'l
3.514CAM::WAYParty on, GarthFri Oct 18 1991 17:5011
>    Believe it or not, I'm off to Atlanta tonight.  Going swimming with a
>    girl I hardly know down there.  Wonder how many laps I can do in that
>    hotel room jacuzee.  Should be fun.
    
dan'l,

You're really starting to annoy me!

If you're going swimming with her and you hardly know her, be safe....

Wear a wetsuit!  8^)
3.515SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadFri Oct 18 1991 18:2414
>lately your notes are starting to read like a cheap
>    harlequin novel.
    
    Funny, so is my life.
    
    Thanks for the chuckle, Saw.  Just what I needed after the Pirates'
    demise.  (See, I knew I could get this back to the NL.)
    
    Is anyone going to start a world series note or will that discussion be
    reduced to IgKnorr and T(winkie brain) on VAXphone since this will be
    so anti-climactic?
    
    	--dan'l
    
3.516ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightFri Oct 18 1991 18:2623
    Main I *luv* you Pittsburgh guys!  
    
    First, cuz almost all a you seem to be *from* Pittsburgh.  And, hey,
    I ain't gonna rub your faces in the stinky choke-job turned in by
    them fishbone sword-swallowers who wear those stupid retro puke yellow
    and black uniforms who shall remain nameless to protect the guilty.
    
    No, I LUV the way you guys shamelessly fed us a crock o' bull about 
    last year's empty seats and now THIS year what do we git?
    
    	* Dan'l turning to unsafe sex to salve his remorse
    
    	* RaKe waxing about antediluvian history as if it somehow meant
          anything.  Hey, RaKe, git a clue willya.  Be here now!  Be here
          now or be square how you cain compare Pirate feigns with real
          baseball fans is beyond MrT and reality!
    
    re: Rochibaud
    
    Know what?  It's good to see you finally emerge as WardleVane's
    successor.  But, like Pittsburghians, you ain't even a good front-runner.
    
    MrT
3.517And now in the pike position...SHALOT::MEDVIDYou cause as much sorrow deadFri Oct 18 1991 18:435
>    	* Dan'l turning to unsafe sex to salve his remorse
    
    Never do I perform unsafe sex.  I ALWAYS use a safety net.
    
    	--dan'l
3.518QUASER::HUNTERAir Force Football,Feel The ThunderFri Oct 18 1991 19:087
    MrT
    
     I really don't think this guy comes close to Wardlevane when it
    come to blowing in the wind.......  I could be wrong,  lets ask JoJ's
    dog Jerry !!!!  ;^)
    
    Big Game
3.519Reaction from Pittsburgh has been sad and disappointingNAC::G_WAUGAMANSun Oct 20 1991 16:5573
    
    Little late on this, but... first things first, I must extend a hearty 
    congratulations to the Braves.  For the most part, this team is a bunch 
    of kids, mere pups, and they didn't back down one iota in response to 
    the pressure of this intense NLCS.  They slipped up a bit last night, 
    but I expect they'll be back strong tonight to tie things up at 1-1.  
    I don't know if MrT was blowing smoke or not, but regardless I guess he 
    got to see what he wanted in Game 1 from that "corporate box" of his,
    wherever it might be located.
    
    On a second point, I hope most of what I've read in the aftermath of 
    Game 7 was just the immediate emotional reaction to a disappointing 
    series for the Pirates, because most of it doesn't make too much sense.
    Would we be hearing all this crying over overpaid players and ticket
    prices if Bonds and company had come through and the Braves hadn't? 
    I seriously doubt it.  Hey, somebody's got to win and somebody's got 
    to lose, even if *both* sides get paid well (and if the Braves' players
    aren't right now, they soon will be).  I can also personally attest
    that there are many, many tickets available and affordable to families
    in Pittsburgh, on a regular basis, so I'm not buying into this business
    of the Pirates losing a big series somehow being responsible for all
    that's wrong in sports today.  Look at it from the other side, from the
    Braves' side, and general opinion on the matter shifts pretty quickly
    towards what's still great about the game of baseball...
    
    Why is all of this invective being hurled exclusively at Bonds and
    Bonilla, too?  What about Van Slyke?  Why is he such a sacred cow?  The
    guy's the highest paid player on the team, has already got his money
    instead of just waiting to get it, and admitted that he didn't set the 
    stage for the 3-4-5 slots and just didn't get it done (after Game 1
    he was just as much an automatic out as the guys who followed).  I'll 
    go on record as saying that if Bonds ends up walking (Bonilla's already 
    gone) in part because the Pirates decided to pay Van Slyke $4 million a 
    year over a longterm contract, they decided on the wrong guy.  I like
    Slick, but he's no Bonds, and at $4 million is overpaid by MLB standards.
    You might like his "attitude", for whatever that's worth, but it will be 
    no substitute for production.  
    
    For more perspective on Bonds, let's not forget what the eminently 
    lovable Willie Stargell did in his first *five* postseason appearances 
    *before* 1979-- .221, 2 HR, 6 RBI in the playoffs (in four of five 
    *losing* efforts), and .208, 0 HR, 1 RBI in the 1971 Series.  Are you
    guys forgetting that Willie had a *major* "choke" albatross around his
    neck going into 1979, or were you just more of a faithful fan, win or 
    lose?  Or was the offense really more forgivable just because Stargell 
    wasn't hauling down six figures?  I can't buy that.  Our memories are 
    short and always subject to revision, especially where winning and 
    losing-- a 50/50 proposition-- is concerned.  Bonds has plenty of time 
    left, and I for one would love to see a player of his caliber on my 
    team for years to come.  He's that kind of talent, and eventually 
    talent wins out.
    
    Lastly, there's no excuse for how far short Game 7 was from a sellout.
    History doesn't mean a thing if there aren't many natives left who 
    truly appreciate it.  Pittburghers sensing the "choke" doesn't cut it
    as an answer, either (how many of those folks would have been right 
    back on the bandwagon for the World Series?).  I had three members of 
    my immediate family, still die-hard Pirates fans all (I gave up such 
    rigid allegiance to my team of birthright long ago), at this series-- 
    who came in from Cincinnati, DC, and San Francisco to do so (these
    people aren't rich either, but they do understand that the opportunity
    to see the Pirates in the postseason, much less a Game 7, is a rare
    one).  It is a shame that a Game 7 to the most exciting series in years
    wasn't able to attract even 50,000 fans, even if just as fans of great 
    baseball.  If the Pirates ever do move from Pittsburgh, which really 
    would be a great tragedy, the fans who couldn't even make it out to a 
    Game 7 at the home park of the team with the best record in baseball 
    would only have themselves to blame.  You can't keep pointing fingers at
    management, not when the product has been as good as the Pirates the
    past few years...
    
    glenn
    
3.520ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Oct 21 1991 10:5710
    >They slipped up a bit lasnight...
    
    Got their butts kicked is more like i
    
    >... but I suspect they'll be back strong tonight to tie things up at 
    >1-1
    
    No, they're 0-2 and whining about the umpiring.
    
    MrT
3.521Proof PositiveSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsMon Oct 21 1991 11:2322
    Took a trip to Atlanta this weekend to visit a young lady friend of
    mine.  She is a professed Braves fan, but was quite merciful on my
    emotional state regarding the Bucs' choke job.  
    
    Anyway, she gets this room for us at the Marriott Suites downtown.  She
    said she would have a snack (food) waiting for me when I arrived after
    my long drive Friday evening.  Walked in the door, and there's this
    plate of crackers and this round glop of cheese on a plate waiting for
    me.  I asked, "What's that?"
    
    I kid you not, folks.  She replied...
    
    
    
    "Brie"
    
    
    
    It was all I could do from becoming the total definition of Seriously
    Rollward.  I ate only the crackers and got down to business.
    
    	--dan'l
3.522Transplanted Minnesotan?CTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSMon Oct 21 1991 11:251
    
3.523ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYPlato,Homer,Voltaire,BobKnightMon Oct 21 1991 11:329
    Why didn't you eat the brie?  It woluda inured you buds for sensory
    impacts encountered only minutes later, us it's a food much preferred
    by people of discrination, taste, and class.
    
    Or, more to the point, what was the beer?  Heinekin or Iron City (that
    watered-down swill much loved by chest-beating pseudo-machos too skeert
    and not main enough to admit they've made it).
    
    MrT
3.524Yuppies, Blue Bloods, and then there's ol' dan'lSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsMon Oct 21 1991 11:4728
>    Or, more to the point, what was the beer?  Heinekin or Iron City (that
>    watered-down swill much loved by chest-beating pseudo-machos too skeert
>    and not main enough to admit they've made it).

    She had Rolling Rock waiting for me.  It was a good beer before it
    became yuppified, so that and the crackers (no pun intended) weren't
    that bad.

    And another thing, you should see Atlanta and how totally they are
    behind this team.  Got my first taste of it about 20 miles outside of
    the city when this pickup truck merges into the lane next to me and
    what should it have attached to the bed but a 10 foot, totally
    aerodynamic tomahawk.  And driving into the city, if a building doesn't
    have a tomahawk on it, it looks out of place.  Even the church steeples
    have tomahawks on them.

    Went to a formal reception at the Georgian Terrace Hotel Saturday
    night.  There's ol' dan'l mixing with the Atlanta Blue Bloods, looking
    for some old rich sugar mamma with one foot in the grave wanting
    companionship for the last few years of her life.  No such luck. 

    Anyway, I digress; most of these aristocrats in black tie and buns
    cumbered were wearing walkmans, or had watchmans, or had brought
    portables and were watching the game out on the terrace.  Their being
    so engrossed with the game left the food and drink lines short and boy
    did I take advantage of that...with utmost decorum of course.

    	--dan'l
3.525AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopMon Oct 21 1991 11:586
    	Iron City is a good beer.  Figures MorT wouldn't like it.  MorT's
    like those Viking fans who came to Foxboro with parkas and huge
    blankets to guard against the 50 degree weather yesterday.  Braves
    take three in a row in Hotlanta.
    
    				/Don
3.526CAM::WAYAin' no sunshine when she's goneMon Oct 21 1991 12:0716
Actually, Brie is not a bad cheese at all.  

Like other yuppified things, however, it has been tainted by the fact
that genetically inferior financially superior people like Chip and
Muffy have made it a symbol of their plastic lifestyle....


I'm not a big wine drinker, preferring beer and/or whiskey (Jack Daniels),
so if I ever have Brie, it ain't with win or Perrier.  (You oughta see
folks do a double take if I'm having Brie with my Jack).....


Still love a good sharp (Supremely SHARP) Vermont Cheddar the best....


'Saw
3.527Camembert's danged good, tooANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 12:441
    
3.528#71 in my BBall hat collection !!!!CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis Today?Mon Oct 21 1991 12:5718
    T,
    
    I see from your personal name that you REALLY did go to da game since
    
    that particular banner wasn't shown on TV but the guy in my office
    
    told me about it earlier today.  (He also brought me a super looking
    
    Twins BBall hat, white cloth with red 1991 "M" stiched in and in large
    
    dark blue letters "Champions" stiched in just above the brim.
    
    Also hanging from my partition wall is a Homer Hankie.
    
    I gots to know - How many plates can ya stack on Bonds butt??
    
    Kev
    
3.529ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 13:3710
    Best banner I ever saw in my life.  Btw, I saw Ted on the concourse 
    during the game.  He was walking along with this grin on his face
    (not a care in the world, but if *you* had $200M and Jane wouldn't
    YOU be grinning too?) and poking at this tiny hand-held electronic
    device not even watching where he was going.  
    
    But we watched were he was going and he was going back to sit next
    to Jane.  Dirty rat.
    
    MrT
3.530Yeah, sure he did ...SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Mon Oct 21 1991 14:0614
3.531from a reputable news source!CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis Today?Mon Oct 21 1991 14:1414
    I forget eggzakly where I saw it but I think it was in the
    
    Sunday "Parade" magazine and they had a blurb on Jane.  Seems that
    
    although she's a bodacious 53 years old, she's travelled the road
    
    that Cher has - a nip here, a tuck there and a implant to go from a 
    
    "A" to a "B".
    
    HTH,
    
    Kev
    
3.532STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesMon Oct 21 1991 14:326
    T -- ask Spud about his encounter with Ted and Jane after last night's
    game (if he hasn't already told you about it, or if you haven't already
    read the BASEBALL conference).
    
    
    py
3.533"but Ump, he PULLED my leg offa da bag!!!!"CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis Today?Mon Oct 21 1991 14:4322
    No athletic contest would be complete without a bit of
    
    controversy so let's start this one with that little bit
    
    of an "encounter" at first base in the 4th(?) inning when the
    
    MinnyTwinny (don't remember his name) 1st baseman, ahem, assisted
    
    the Braves guy (ditto on the name) offa the bag and had him called
    
    out.
    
    Should he have been safe?  
    
    I loved how CBS tried to create an issue out of it by bringing in
    
    Lasorda and umps to keep it going.  I'm only doing my part here
    
    to help!  ~/~
    
    Kev
    
3.534ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 16:007
    Gant's motion pulled him off the bag.  Hrbek merely tagged him.
    You don't have to be Einstein to know that as Hrbie maintained
    the tag that it would appear as if he were pulling his leg when
    in fack he was only maintaining contact with the leg's upward
    motion that was the result of Gan's clumsiness.
    
    MrT
3.535lousy calGRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Mon Oct 21 1991 16:067
    RE.534
    
    Yea sure... Gant just about knocked little Kent over.
    
    I don't care who wins this boring series.  
    
    I thought Eric Gregg was working first on that call.
3.536And McCarver is still a boobSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsMon Oct 21 1991 16:0914
    Thank you, Dr. Science.
    
    The head of umps in the booth put it best (when I though he was going
    to really defend his umpire) when he:
    
    	- explained the rule
    	- said it was the ump's judgement call
    
    It was a good call if you're a Twinks fan.  It was a bad call if you're
    a Bravos fan.  It was the ump's call if you're anything else.
    
    And I loved when they woke up Lasorda to ask his opinion.  
    
    	--dan'l
3.537CAM::WAYAin' no sunshine when she's goneMon Oct 21 1991 16:184
>    And I loved when they woke up Lasorda to ask his opinion.  
    
They didn't wake him up.  They had to pry the Thick, Rich and
DEEEE-licous SlimeFast shake outta his mouth.....8^)
3.538HERIAM::CORBETTDo you think people will ever learn?Mon Oct 21 1991 16:4212
RE: Call at first

	I think Hrbeck pulled him off.  Great move too...you never get the call
if you don't give it a try.  

	and where is Mr. Robichaud today now that the spamball representative
has jumped out 2-0.  Look the Braves may need that luck after all huh /Don?


	Twins in 5....

mc
3.539ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 16:5316
    Credit Tim McCarver for maintaining his objectivity as a analyst
    (I *LUV* it when they do that!) vis a vis the Twins among this
    pro-NL crew.
    
    He corrected the senile Jack Buck on several points, not the least
    a which is that the Dome was silent on Lemke's stupid mistake on
    the pop fly and therefore noise played no part in that miscommunication.
    
    Even Lasorda was still making this false claim at the broadcast's end.
    
    The Twins are licking their chops at the prospect of taking their big
    bats to the punk home run park called the Launching Pad.
    
    Twins in 5.
    
    MrT(wins)
3.540HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Mon Oct 21 1991 16:553
       /Don lost his voice at the Pats game yesterday. That's why he's so
    quiet in here. He talks as he types.
                                   Denny
3.541SHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsMon Oct 21 1991 16:555
    If it was deemed Hrbek was interfering, does the runner get second?  Is
    there any deterrent on the first baseman's part?

    	--dan'l

3.542T in same league as McCarver...that'll tell ya somethin'SHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsMon Oct 21 1991 17:0213
>    a which is that the Dome was silent on Lemke's stupid mistake on
>    the pop fly and therefore noise played no part in that miscommunication.
    
    You are right, T.  It wasn't the noise that disrupted an otherwise
    routine play, but it was still the dome that caused that ball to drop. 
    In my opinion, both players feared taking their eyes off the ball and
    consequently losing it in the white roof.  
    
    Still, Justice should have been calling anyone off regardless if he
    knew Lemke was there or not.  Error on young Dave any way you look at
    it.
    
    	--dan'l
3.543;-)HAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersMon Oct 21 1991 17:077
    I find it sort of ironic that Mr. T is supporting a team that plays 
    in that DH league and on that artificial stuff.
    
    Anyone know what the Twinkies record is in real stadiums with real
    grass?
    
    Mike
3.544they both know Conan too... they both know Conan the Libarian too...CNTROL::CHILDSEver meet a weak Ape?Mon Oct 21 1991 17:116
 Not really Mike when you consider that the Wardleshooter hisself introduced
 T to this fine conference...

 obviously they had more in common than just work....

 ;^)
3.545Reposted for Tex Corbett. I'll stick with this predictionAXIS::ROBICHAUDCardiac PatsMon Oct 21 1991 17:1513
           <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 3.525               The National League (Baseball)               525 of 544
AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Doin' the Tomahawk Chop"             6 lines  21-OCT-1991 09:58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    	Iron City is a good beer.  Figures MorT wouldn't like it.  MorT's
    like those Viking fans who came to Foxboro with parkas and huge
    blankets to guard against the 50 degree weather yesterday.  Braves
    take three in a row in Hotlanta.
    
    				/Don
3.546Slide yells the 1st base coach!TSGDEV::RUSSELLMon Oct 21 1991 17:206
    No one mentions that Gant Should have slid back to first base.  If he
    had slid then there wouldn't have been any problems.   Gant should be
    lambasted for his mistakes, go to far of 1st to draw a throw and then
    not to slide. 
    
    
3.547HERIAM::CORBETTDo you think people will ever learn?Mon Oct 21 1991 17:257
RE: /Don

	good enough...I just want to make sure you eat your share of 
crow when the Spamballer win it.

mc
3.548STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesMon Oct 21 1991 17:338
    re the last couple:
    
    Braves taking three in Hotlanta is the one chance they have to still
    pull this off.   Even 2 of 3 at home makes it necessary for the Braves
    to take Games 6 AND 7 in Minnesota....I just don't see them doing that.
    
    
    py     
3.549Neither did the PiratesWMOIS::REEVE_CMon Oct 21 1991 17:401
    
3.550Go Twins! Keep Beating the Atlanta Braves !!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 17:431
    
3.551STAR::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesMon Oct 21 1991 17:5611
    >                      -< Neither did the Pirates >-
    
    Yes, BUT -- the Twinkiedome is a MUCH bigger home field advantage than
    Three Rivers.   You can take it to the bank that there would not be
    7,000 empty seats for a Game 7 in Minnesota, then throw in the physical
    factors (such as the roof) plus the fact that it's AL rules (i.e., DH
    is used, giving the Twins a much stronger lineup 1 to 9 than they'll
    have in Atlanta where the pitchers must bat.
    
    
    py
3.552GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreMon Oct 21 1991 18:2512
    I think it's interesting that everyone is blaming the ump and Hrebek
    for the call at 1st rather than Gant. I would say this situation is
    very much like the "missed" third base during the NLCS. Gant knew he
    would make it back, very much like Justice knew he had touched 3rd. In
    both cases, perception became reality as Justice was called out and
    Gant couldn't "hold" the bag at 1st. The AL ump at first should have
    seen the problem (although I can't say the same for the Justice play at
    third) but from what I've heard today he's not one of the better umps
    in the AL. 
    
    Dennis
    
3.553Dennis... you're blind!GRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Mon Oct 21 1991 18:326
    Dennis...
    
    You couldn't have seen the play and thought Gants' momentum carried him
    off!  I thought you paid attention to this sport!
    
    Rick:^)
3.554GRANPA::DFAUSTGo for 1000% moreMon Oct 21 1991 18:385
    Rick, 
    
    At least one person thought it did!!!	:*)
    
    Dennis
3.555Gant, Justice, Lemke, Bream... MISTAKE-PRONE !!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 18:555
    Gant's momentum clearly carried him off the bag.  Shoddy baserunning
    on his part.  A course, *then* protocol dictates that poor Hrbie (the
    best defensive 1B in the game) must be blamed for his clumsiness...
    
    MrT(wins)
3.556like Bob saidANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 21 1991 18:589
    It's become apparent that the young Braves are in over their haids
    in this Series.  They're just happy to be there and that's a good
    outlook for them to take.  Now that they're in the Series they should
    just smile and be positive and enjoy it all and let the veteran Twins
    (who've been there before) take care a it all.
    
    Yes, they should just lay back and enjoy it...
    
    MrT(wins)
3.557Another brainwash job...GUSHER::WAUGAMANMon Oct 21 1991 19:0821
    
>    Gant's momentum clearly carried him off the bag.  Shoddy baserunning
>    on his part.  A course, *then* protocol dictates that poor Hrbie (the
>    best defensive 1B in the game) must be blamed for his clumsiness...
     
    Huh?  Never thought I'd read such tripe from an "objective analyst",
    but then again we're talking about someone who's steadfastly refused 
    to address the subject of the hypocrisy of his sudden love for the 
    Twins, in light of past criticisms of their entire operation and 
    league.  The stuff's really starting to get deep in here...
    
    For what it's worth, from the replays I saw Gant *maybe* would have 
    come off the bag had Herbie not interfered, but it did look like
    Gant switched feet on the bag and was going to maintain contact, 
    however tenuously.  Once Hrbek interfered, however, that becomes a 
    moot point.  Hrbek clearly brought the glove up and Gant's leg with
    it.  It's not the umpire's job to guess what would have happened
    in the absence of such interference.
    
    glenn
    
3.558Quit Cheating And Play The Friggen Game !!!QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeMon Oct 21 1991 19:1410
     It is obvious that the Braves are in over their respective heads.
    I am pulling for the Twins to win this thing but I found it pretty
    tough to do after the crap Hrbeck pulled at 1st base.  I don't know
    about you boys and girls but I was always taught that it's not
    whether you win our lose but how you play the game.....  I sure 
    wouldn't sleep well knowing I cheated in the biggest of big games.
    Although it doesn't look like they will,  I hope the Braves make
    it an interesting series !!
    
    Big Game
3.559CAM::WAYAin' no sunshine when she's goneMon Oct 21 1991 20:4618
I tend to agree with Big Game.

The way the play looked to me, Gant looked as if he would stay on the
bag.  Yes, he was off-balance, but I didn't think his leg would come
off.

Hrbek on the other hand, did what a lot of Sportsmen do.  He pushed
the rules to the absolute limit, and got the call he wanted.

I do that on the rugby pitch every chance I can.  If I'm in the lineout,
I'll barge and barge and barge until I get called.  If I'm throwing in,
I'll shade it towards my team until it gets called.  Hrbek did the
same thing.  He pulled the guys leg, but got a favorable call.

That's the way I saw it, and I'm not particularly going for anyone
in this series, I'm just waiting for it to be over......

'Saw
3.560CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatMon Oct 21 1991 22:0823
    I cain trufefooly say that so far, I've watched no more than 1/3 inning
    of the Worldly Serious.
    
    I flew into Pittsburgh Saturday afternoon from Colorado Springs(boy my
    arms were tired).  After having my wife and 3 curtain climbers meet me
    at the airport, getting re-acquainted with all 4 of them, and finally
    getting to the old homestead, we had dinner and after some "TV" time,
    put the kiddies to bed.  Tally, went thru 35 gallons of "Veinerschlider
    50"....'nuff said!!
    
    Sunday, took the kiddies to WQED for the open house so's they could
    visit the real "Mr. Rogers" place.  Taped the Steelers game(tape is now
    in the trash, couldn't stand the thought of re-using something with
    that abomination of a game on it), went out to dinner, then home, put
    the kiddies to bed and finished off the rest of the 55 gallon drum of
    "veinerschlider 50".  Couldn't waste 2 perfectly good nights watching
    the worldless series!!!
    
    Anybody know where I cain get recapped??????
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.561Go Braves! Do it for *REAL* baseball!HAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersMon Oct 21 1991 22:091
    
3.562CELTIK::JACOBLoaded for Bare-CatTue Oct 22 1991 01:4286
    
    >>                  <<< Note 3.519 by NAC::G_WAUGAMAN >>>
    >>      -< Reaction from Pittsburgh has been sad and disappointing >-
    
    >>Why is all of this invective being hurled exclusively at Bonds and
    >>Bonilla, too?  What about Van Slyke?  Why is he such a sacred cow?  The
    >>guy's the highest paid player on the team, has already got his money
    >>instead of just waiting to get it, and admitted that he didn't set the 
    >>stage for the 3-4-5 slots and just didn't get it done (after Game 1
    >>he was just as much an automatic out as the guys who followed).  I'll 
    >>go on record as saying that if Bonds ends up walking (Bonilla's already 
    >>gone) in part because the Pirates decided to pay Van Slyke $4 million a 
    >>year over a longterm contract, they decided on the wrong guy.  I like
    >>Slick, but he's no Bonds, and at $4 million is overpaid by MLB standards.
    >>You might like his "attitude", for whatever that's worth, but it will be 
    >>no substitute for production.  
    
    Glenn,
    
    On the field, BOnds is an asset, but once off of the filed, he becomes
    a liability.  Go back to lasted year's NLCS, when Jeff King was
    injured(back problems which kept him out most of this year also). 
    Bonds flaps his jaws about King not playing hurting the club.  What
    does Bonds do to help in that NLCS, hit somewhere around .183.  This
    year, he kept his big mouth shut for a while, but every time he stepped
    into the batter's box, he swung for the fences, trying to be the hero,
    instead of just trying to hit the ball, and hits, AGAIN, below .200. 
    Afterwards, he accuses the media of putting him under a microscope. 
    He's the jerk who didn't hit.  It was in the NLCS, nationally
    televised.  Overall, he is bad for team moral with some of the day to
    day BS he spews.
    
    Bonilla, on the other hand, when asked what he thought of Van Slyke's
    performance following game one, jumped down the reporter's throat,
    accusing him of trying to make Van Slyke out to be a superstar.  Sour
    Grapes over Van Slyke's contract?????  You tell me.
    
    Both Bonds and Bonilla have been holding the contract BS over the Bucs
    mgmt head all year long, with Bonds continually making threats to be
    gone after nexted year.  
    
    I don't have the exact stats in front of me, but let's compare Van
    Slyke and Bonilla.  Van Slyke hit in the low .260's this year, with 17
    HR's and 83 RBI.  Bonilla hit right about .300, with 18 homers and 100
    RBI.  Edge to Bonilla.  40 points on the average. Where Van Slyke has
    it over Bonilla HANDS DOWN is defense.  Slyke can run circles around
    Bonilla in outfield range, and in his throwing accuracy, too.  Bonilla
    is slow on the bases,  Van Slyke is a base stealing threat.  the $4 mil
    plus that Van Slyke gets is a bit on the high side, but you take Van
    Slyke out of the Pirate line-up, and CF goes to hell.  Van Slyke missed
    some games this year and while he was out, a couple of the games were
    lost on hits to center that Van Slyke would have made routinely, but
    whoever the bum of the day was in center field couldn't track down.
    Bonilla would be best suited as a first baseman, but may need a bit of
    work to succeed at it.  If I had to choose between keeping Bonilla and
    playing him in right field, or keeping Van SLyke and having him play
    center, Bonilla would have his plane reservations already. 
    
    What the Pirates should do with the Bonds situation, if Larry Doughty
    is smart, and there are many here in Pittsburgh who think he's not, is
    trade Bonds now, while his stock is up.  Get a starter(LF or RF) for
    him, and a couple of young prospects, and throw his going away party
    after his plane leaves.  Bonds is a little kid in a man's body.
    
    Bonilla will probably get huge bucks this winter, but he's just a
    slightly above average ball player, at best.  He's not worth more than
    $2.5-3.0mil/year, but he'll get almost twice that.  As far as Bonds
    goes, once he gets a "big bucks" contract, I look for him to do what
    Dave Parker did when he got his huge contract in Pittsburgh, FALL FLAT
    ON HIS FACE!!!!!  it'll go to Bonds head and he'll drown in himself for
    a year or two afterward.
    
    Another thing the Bucs should do, tell Jim Leyland that they'll double
    his salary and give him a gauranteed 5 year contract with an
    exclusivity clause in it.  Manage the Bucs, or no one for the nexted
    five years.  Leyland has, with help from Syd Thrift and Larry
    Dorky...er...I mean Doughty, built this team.  he's been the major
    factor for the Bucs having the best record in baseball during the
    regular season, and making the playoffs the lasted 2 years.  It was his
    big bats that let him down and kept the Bucs from being up 2-0 over the
    Twinkies right now.  Above all, KEEP LEYLAND!!!
    
    'nuff for now
    
    JaKe
    
3.563Atlanta celebrates T's KOD!SHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsTue Oct 22 1991 11:048
>    poor Hrbie (the
>    best defensive 1B in the game) 
    
    I recall six months ago T making a claim that Casey was the best goalie
    in hockey.  After this, he was pulled in the remaining three games due
    to his ineffectiveness and the Penguines won the Stanley Cup.
    
    	--dan'l
3.564AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopTue Oct 22 1991 12:397
	You know, the way Poor MrT has been staggerin' around on this 
designated geek issue, like a rummy swinging from a street lamp, one has to 
question the main's stability.  MorT, I's worried about ya'.

				/Don

P.S. Go Braves!  Win it for *real* baseball!!
3.565ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 22 1991 14:2713
    There is no hypocrisy in my rooting for the Twins.  Explain your charge,
    Waugamain, and I'll answer it.  But for now, you're just blowing hot
    air, just so much bluster.
    
    As for Hrbie, he's generally considered the best defensive 1B in the
    game.  The only reason he hasn't been winning Gold Gloves in the past
    is cuz a a certain pocked-face violence-prone whiner who hits .197 and
    steals basks in Gilt by Association and a 49 rabbit ball homer year...
    
    But the gig's up on him now.
    
    MrT
    
3.566Time to smoke this varmint out...GUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Oct 22 1991 15:0736
    
    > As for Hrbie, he's generally considered the best defensive 1B in the
    > game.  The only reason he hasn't been winning Gold Gloves in the past
    > is cuz a a certain pocked-face violence-prone whiner who hits .197 and
    > steals basks in Gilt by Association and a 49 rabbit ball homer year...

    Truly an injustice, but McGwire has affected Hrbek in exactly *one* year
    of his ten-year career.  And while Hrbek is certainly a fine fielder
    (and with Joyner probably one of the two the best in the AL), the
    "best in the game" claim belies MrT's professed knowledge and 
    preference for the Senior Circuit, where Mssrs. Clark and Grace reside,
    superior fielders both.
    
    > There is no hypocrisy in my rooting for the Twins.  Explain your charge,
    > Waugamain, and I'll answer it.  But for now, you're just blowing hot
    > air, just so much bluster.
                          
    Bailiff:     Doyousweartotellthetruththewholetruthandnothinngbutthetruth
                 sohelpyouGod?
    
    Defendant:   I do. 
    (MrT)            
    
    Prosecutor:  Have you at any time in the past suggested that a 
    (Waugamain)  sub-standard Minnesota Twins' franchise might serve as a 
                 suitable candidate for bringing the great game of
                 baseball to the more deserving city of Denver, Colorado?
                 
    Defendant:   Um, er, hem, haw...
    
    Prosecutor:  Answer the question, please, sir!
    
    
    glenn
    
    
3.567ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 22 1991 16:0016
    Defendant:  Yes, I have in the past, and continue at this time, state
                that each and every ALmost League franchise is substandard
                in terms a the product put on the field from the standpoint
                a quality and esthetics, which are critical to a non-action
                thinking main's game such as baseball.
    
                And no, you ain't even explicated how this in any way shape
                or form constitutes hypocrisy on my part in connnection with
                me rooting for the Twins in this World Series.  
    
    	        So, Mr. Persecutor, if they ain't even a question axed (and
                there isn't), then I ain't guilty a hypocrisy.
    
    	        But *you* are hereby found Guilty of non-pacific blabber !!
    
    MrT
3.568Very serious charge, SPORTS' hypocrisy...GUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Oct 22 1991 16:1723
    
>        Defendant:  Yes, I have in the past, and continue at this time, state
>                that each and every ALmost League franchise is substandard
>                in terms a the product put on the field from the standpoint
>                a quality and esthetics, which are critical to a non-action
>                thinking main's game such as baseball.
 
    Prosecutor:  Irrelevant!  Moving an AL franchise from Minnesota
                 to Denver would not in any way improve the esthetics
                 of ALmost League baseball, unless you were implying
                 that the Minnesota Twins were in some way deficient
                 even by ALmost League standards!  Is it not hypocrisy
                 for a Minnesota native who once suggested that major
                 league baseball would be better off without a team 
                 there (but instead with a team in Denver) to adopt the 
                 moniker MrT(wins) upon said team's arrival in the 
                 postseason, and additionally to generally carry on like 
                 a lovesick schoolboy over the newfound success of "his"
                 Minnesota Twins?!  *That* is the question, and the 
                 accusation before you that you must refute...
    
    glenn
    
3.569CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Tue Oct 22 1991 16:209
Gentlemen, Gentlemen....

You didn't ask permission to have a Trial in here.

Even in the REAL world, you gots to get a date on the docket.  You
just cain't usurp a courtroom and get going at it.....


'Saw
3.570T's even too ashamed to use the AL topic, has to blab hereSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsTue Oct 22 1991 16:231
    
3.571Shaddup 'Saw. This is better 'n CourTV.AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopTue Oct 22 1991 16:271
    
3.572CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Tue Oct 22 1991 16:484
>                 -< Shaddup 'Saw.  This is better 'n CourTV. >-

I'm the DocketMaster.  If you wanna get a courtroom, ya hafta ask
permission!
3.573CNTROL::CHILDSEver meet a weak Ape?Tue Oct 22 1991 17:029
                   <<< Note 3.572 by CAM::WAY "Go Wahoos!" >>>

>                 -< Shaddup 'Saw.  This is better 'n CourTV. >-

>> I'm the DocketMaster.  If you wanna get a courtroom, ya hafta ask
>> permission!


  IMPEACH the DocketMaster NOW!!!!!!1111111111
3.574QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeTue Oct 22 1991 17:045
    THHHHHHHHHPPPPPPTTTTTTTTTTT !!!!!!!!!
    
    I Taut I Taw I Putty Tat !!!!
    
    Big Game
3.575yawnANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 22 1991 17:0711
    >the accusation before you that you must refute...
    
    What accusation?  You ain't accused me a a damned thing.  It's 
    still up to you to explicate any connection between my high browed
    denunciation of the Designated Geek, Turf, and domes, and my perfectly
    understandable boosterism for the Twins, who are clearly the best team
    in the game.
    
    When you do that, *if* you do that (and you won't), then let's talk.
    
    MrT(win Twins WIN !!)
3.576CNTROL::CHILDSEver meet a weak Ape?Tue Oct 22 1991 17:095
 Speaking of Hoot, anyone else fondly remeber the assination threats against
 BO in Arrowhead???

 ;^()
3.577How about a little spam with them eggs MorT?AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopTue Oct 22 1991 17:111
    
3.578AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopTue Oct 22 1991 17:146
    	Hey Mike that was truly a ::SPORTS classic.  I remember him
    saying how if you didn't have a satellite dish you missed Bo putting
    on what looked like a bullet proof vest because the networks censored
    that out.  That was HOOT at his best (or worst).  8^)
    
    				/Don
3.579ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 22 1991 17:2519
    >How about a little spam with them eggs MorT?
    
    Everybody's a smartass.  If you *must* know the menu for the fete 
    we have planned for our World Series Championship Party:
    
    - Heineken
    - Maison de Puy brie
    - Pontet Canet bourdeaux (1976)
    - St. Lo Camembert
    - Perrier (natural flavor)
    - Pepperidge Farms Goldfish (cheddar)
    - Caspian sturgeon caviar
    - Stone ground crackers
    - Baguette loaves (du Hotel Sofitel)
    - Pate du Terrine
    
    This would be in suite #117, to be sure.
    
    MrT(wins! Twins !!  TWINS !!!)
3.580What, no Oreos ???SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Tue Oct 22 1991 17:345
3.581CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Tue Oct 22 1991 17:389
MrT....

I'm surprised at you!  Everyone knows that no spread is complete without
a little Old No 7, Jack Daniels!

Nothin' says lovin' like somethin' from Lynchville.....


'Saw
3.582CTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSTue Oct 22 1991 17:436
    That spread deserves snifters of brandy with fine Cuban cigars fer
    the post-feast palate. Don't forget the grey Poupon strictly for show.
    Are you being chauffered?  Tres chic
    
    MikeL
    
3.583I'm mortified!HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Tue Oct 22 1991 18:082
      Whot, no Ding Dongs!!!
                                         Denny
3.584First MrT sells out on local brethren, then crashes their partyGUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Oct 22 1991 18:1413
    
    Well, you're right of course, MrT, and I apologize.  There's nothing
    hypocritical about your backing of the Twins.  It's just too bad 
    they hadn't moved to Denver as was your wish and weren't preparing 
    to celebrate their supremacy within the confines of Mile High. 
    Would have been a damn sight easier on the eyes and ears a all of us, 
    no question.  But then you wouldn't have had the privilege of 
    "attending" this game from your "corporate box", and nor would you
    have had the chance to fraudulently imbibe of all a this swollen
    Minnehaha civic pride, now would ya?
    
    glenn
    
3.585STAR::YANKOWSKASThis *IS* my day job...Tue Oct 22 1991 18:2611
    We interrupt the Galloping Gourmet for a note about the game.  Although
    I still think the Twins will win the war, I like the Braves chances in
    tonight's battle.  Getting back to Fulton County Stadium has to give
    Atlanta a boost, as will having Avery on the mound.  I'll predict 3-1
    Bravos, Justice 2-run HR the big blow.
    
    However, if the Braves drop this one T may as well pop the cork on the
    Pontet Canet...
    
    
    py
3.586Go Twins !QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeTue Oct 22 1991 18:4612
    
     Although I am rooting for the Twin's I for one am not counting the
    Braves out of it yet.  Everyone I know had the Pirates going to the
    Serious when the Braves went to the Steel City down 3 to 2.  The 
    Braves are young and talented, they could "Shock The World" as Ali
    put it and I may not feel to bad about the lose after the crap Hrbek
    pulled at 1st base the other night.....  What goes around comes around.
    The Braves will take this to a Minimum of 6 games...  and win it all
    if it goes 7.....
    
    Big Game (Who's still riled about Hrbek's stunt)
    
3.587curiouserHAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersTue Oct 22 1991 19:5419
>    - Heineken
>    - Maison de Puy brie
>    - Pontet Canet bourdeaux (1976)
>    - St. Lo Camembert
>    - Perrier (natural flavor)
>    - Pepperidge Farms Goldfish (cheddar)
>    - Caspian sturgeon caviar
>    - Stone ground crackers
>    - Baguette loaves (du Hotel Sofitel)
>    - Pate du Terrine
>    
>    This would be in suite #117, to be sure.
    
    MrT, will Biff and Muffy be there too?

    So how come you root for a team that does not practice all the purities
    of baseball that you hold dear to your heart?
    
    Mike
3.588CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentTue Oct 22 1991 23:099
    >>So how come you root for a team that does not practice all the purities
    >>of baseball that you hold dear to your heart?
    
    Mike, cin you say
    
    HIPPO-critter?????
    
    JaKe
    
3.589perfect Bucco synopsis!GRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Wed Oct 23 1991 00:479
    RE: .562
    
    I absolutely totally agree with every comment.  I have wanted to say
    exactly the same thing without the typing:^)
    
    The Pirates, I understand, have given Leyland permission to talk to 
    the White Sox:^(
    
    Rick
3.590It's right there on page 75.CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Wed Oct 23 1991 10:189
After consulting my copy of the MoRT Translation Guide, the spread is 
as follows:

Twinkies and Bosco.



Steve
3.591NLers prevail in classic NL-style battle!GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Oct 23 1991 11:3037
        
    Very tense game last night, and more than just a little bit sloppy
    on both sides, especially the Braves.  Kid Avery, in spite of
    the score, pitched brilliantly again and deserved better.  Only
    Puckett's home run was his fault; the other two runs credited to
    him were due to Dave Justice's misplay in the first and Terry
    Pendleton's boot in the eighth.  Combined with Mark Lemke's
    near-disastrous muff of a tailor-made DP ball in the twelfth, it 
    was the guys with the good reps on defense that nearly let this one 
    get away.
    
    Dave Justice nearly single-handedly showed the Twinks how NL baseball
    is played in the bottom of that twelfth inning.  Single, easy steal
    off of Brian Harper (who wouldn't be-- and in fact wasn't-- allowed 
    any closer than 90 feet to the starting backstop position in the
    Senior Circuit, what with his spam-like arm), and beautiful dash
    and slide to the plate on a very short single to left off the
    bat of the bailed-out goat Lemke.  Gladden's throw was weak and
    a little off to the third-base side, and that was all the room 
    Justice needed...
    
    A little extra special thanks to the studly Kent Hrbek for properly
    demonstrating how to keep the bat firmly glued to the shoulder in
    crucial at-bats, on order to best coax an umpire's call on perfectly 
    good pitches...

    How many of you Twins' fans (and you too MrT) *really* wanted to see 
    Rick Aguilera, who in spite of his relative hitting talents hadn't had 
    an at-bat since the first half of 1989, up to the plate with the
    bases loaded and two outs in that fateful twelfth inning?  Methinks
    that Tom Kelly, sporting a deeper non-pitcher bench than the Braves,
    may have made one move to many in the ninth, tenth, and eleventh.
    What was that you were saying about NL managing and rocket science,
    Tom?  
    
    glenn
    
3.592ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsWed Oct 23 1991 11:5311
    Tom Kelly was truly outmanaged last night.  There's just no excuse for
    having a pitcher bat with bases loaded in extra innings.
    
    Avery's ERA is lower than it should be.  Pendleton's error only ensued
    because the ump made a bad call on Avery's apparent ball four pitch. 
    That ball was low AND outside.  How he called it a strike I'll never
    understand.  Otherwise, same two-run result.
    
    And I'm dog tired after staying up for that one.
    
    	--dan'l
3.593AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopWed Oct 23 1991 12:086
    	But let's be fair to Kelly.  It's like teaching a kid the alphabet,
    letting him go ten years without ever reading anything then expecting
    a book report about War And Peace.  You cain't apply skills you
    never get a chance to use.
    
    				/Don
3.594RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't quit the day job...Wed Oct 23 1991 12:5836
    Great game lasted night.  Thank God for the West Coast - game over at
    9:30 or thereabouts...
    
    Lots of chances for second guessing.
    
    First, on the Twins side, we have Tom Kelly doing his Dean SMith
    imitation, substituting and changing players like he was coaching
    hockey.  No way do you get forced into having to let the pitcher bat in
    a crucial spot.  Why oh why did he pinch hit Newman for Pags???  I
    don't care what Pags average is - let him swing, cuz with one swing, he
    can change the game.  Newman has zero power.  ALso, as stated earlier,
    it wastes a guy.  Also, as noted earlier, the double switch backfired
    by taking the bat out of Kirby's hand.   Kent Hrbek must be thinking of
    being a model for a scuptor.  Hey KENT - wake up and at least SWING the
    lumber!
    
    On the Braves side - I was second guessing Cox all night, but the
    Braves won.  My first "WHADDAYADOIN!" was when he took Avery out.  Felt
    it wasn't the right time.  One more batter.  Second was when he brought
    in Pena - I had a bad feeling.  I don't know why he replaced Mercker
    when he did - he was going to walk Puckett - why not let Mercker do it,
    and I was nervous when he brough in CLancy - a junkballer to face
    Aggie.  THought Aggie would hit something that didn't break.
    
    Why oh why does Ron Gant swing on the first pitch in crucial
    situations?  ALso, Ronny was really pushing out there - resulting in
    lots of pop ups.
    
    The twins have taken advantage of every miscue by the Braves - until
    the 12th last night.  Perhaps that's the turnaround.  THey made a
    mistake and lived, they beat the other guys stud reliever. They won a
    game started by Avery that Avery didn't have to be perfect in.
    
    Great game.  
    
    JD
3.595Reprinted from the BASEBALL conferenceSLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Wed Oct 23 1991 13:1725
 Great game ... I really thought the Twins were going to break hearts all
 over Dixie when they came back and tied it off the previously untouchable
 Avery *and* Pena.
 
 I like Tom Kelly's style.   Yeah, he left himself short-handed at game's
 end but he was going to fire *all* his guns no matter what.   Yes, you can
 question each of the individual moves but there's no question that he was
 playing for the win in each and every situation.   I like that and I think
 the Twins will ultimately win the Series for it.
 
 That plus Kelly and his players usually do the little things right.   It
 looks like they've got "the book" on each of the Braves hitters and their
 defensive positioning is just about perfect ... remember when Gant lined
 out to Gagne to end a late inning ... perfect placement.    Yes, McCarver
 thought that Puckett was too deep on a few occasions but it didn't kill
 the Twins.
 
 Braves have huge hearts.    Both Avery's and Pena's bubbles were burst and
 they still hung in there and won it.    Their little guys are doing a
 great job.   Olson is the gutsiest player on either team and Lemke and
 Belliard are hanging right in there, too.
 
 Great great baseball.   Twins look very very good.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.596best game since 86's game 6HAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersWed Oct 23 1991 13:4517
3.597AXIS::ROBICHAUDDoin' the Tomahawk ChopWed Oct 23 1991 14:4022
	I agree that Avery was losing it and today's GLOB had the stats for 
the Braves' Big Three (Avery, Smoltz and Glavine) pitching on three day's 
rest and it ain't good.  I always wondered why teams insist on using a 
fifth starter (how many quality fifth starters can you name?) instead of 
using only four.  It could start at the minor league level and by the time 
these picthers reach the majors they could be strong enough to pitch on 
three days rest.  It's my belief that most of today's young pitchers can't 
pitch on three days rest because they never have.

	As an example take JD and his forklift driver's job.  Let's assume 
he lifts 1000 lbs. a day.  Now if every once and a while he as to lift say 
1500 lbs. he would probably be a little tired, but if he lifted that 1500 
lbs. every day he would get stronger and be able to handle the load daily. 
Of course everyone has a physical limit, but getting back to pitchers, 
since pitching on three days rest was done before successfully, there is no 
reason to believe it can't be done again.  Now while offensive statistics 
would probably suffer and jobs would be lost (causing the Players Union to 
howl) the aesthetic quality of the game would be raised.  And in these days 
of domed stadiums and Glad Bag outfield fences, anything that increases the 
quality of the product can't be considered a negative.

				/Don
3.598Avery progressing to another plane...GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Oct 23 1991 14:4920
3.599HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Oct 23 1991 15:125
> Of course everyone has a physical limit, but getting back to pitchers, 
    
      Come on Slasher, are you trying to tell us you have a limit on
    pitchers!! You cain only take so much a that Old Milwaukee eh?!
                                             Denny  8^o
3.600spells fatigue or lack of the right stuff to meHAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersWed Oct 23 1991 15:215
    I don't care who the pitcher is, I would've yanked him too.  Puckett
    hit one out, 2 others hit to the warning track, and another hit one on
    a rope to the centerfielder.
    
    Mike
3.601GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Oct 23 1991 15:4013
    
>    I don't care who the pitcher is, I would've yanked him too.  Puckett
>    hit one out, 2 others hit to the warning track, and another hit one on
>    a rope to the centerfielder.
 
    Sorry, Mike, didn't want to make it sound like I was disagreeing 
    about Avery coming out.  I thought it was time, too.  I was
    only responding to the "just didn't have it last night" comment.
    If that kind of a performance is "not having it", the kid's got
    a very bright future indeed...
    
    glenn
    
3.602ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureWed Oct 23 1991 16:0030
    You people leave me alone with these hypocrisy allegations.  Look,
    my position is simple, I aim a victim a circumstances.  Criticizing
    me is not unlike a rabbi busting a orthodox for eating a slab of bad
    meat when faced with starvation.
    
    Speaking a vittles, Mike, what kind a show would putting out Grey
    Poupon be?  A show a bad taste, maybe.  Our moutard will be Maille,
    and only Maille, thank you.
    
    re: The Game
    
    The game, the best Series game in a loooong time, is an object lesson
    on why the Designated Geek should be done away with immediately.  The
    phone lines on the radio talk shows in Mpls. were burning with Twins
    fans commenting on how "interesting" and "fascinating" the game was.
    
    TK has to be mortified that he shot his mouth off yesterday with that
    "rocket science" comment, ending up later that night with a pitcher 
    batting in the five hole and a whole lotta egg on his face.
    
    Classic game.  GOT to luv the NL's more exciting brand a baseball, 
    and has anybody noticed how many exciting games the Braves have been
    involved in since the stretch drive (a classic itself) started?  
    
    re: Atlanta fans
    
    Classy.  First they trash a innocent billboard, then a death threat
    to Hrbie's ma, then a death threat to Hrbie's sister.
    
    MrT
3.603GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Oct 23 1991 16:1420
          
>    You people leave me alone with these hypocrisy allegations.  Look,
>    my position is simple, I aim a victim a circumstances.  Criticizing
>    me is not unlike a rabbi busting a orthodox for eating a slab of bad
>    meat when faced with starvation.
     
    A perfect analogue, MrT.  Perfect.  The Minnesota Twins and a slab
    of bad meat.  Glad we could clear that up...
    
>    Classy.  First they trash a innocent billboard, then a death threat
>    to Hrbie's ma, then a death threat to Hrbie's sister.
     
    A buddy of mine and I were commenting today at lunch that Atlanta must 
    be the Boston a the South!  Gotta luv it.  Up in Minnesota the fans 
    don't say boo they're so squeaky clean, and down in 'Lanta the
    Tomahawkers are taking spray paint cans to a billboard situated in the 
    lobby of one of their most posh hotels!
    
    glenn
     
3.604RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't quit the day job...Wed Oct 23 1991 16:3914
    On my comment about pulling Avery.  It probably was the  right thing,
    percentage-wise, but I had a feeling he could get out of the inning. 
    But, I'm not a manager, and it was easy from my couch in Seattle to
    yell at Cox to keephimindamnit!
    
    The Braves pitchers struck out 13 twins last night - not a bad job -
    even for extra innings.
    
    Another move I didn't agree with was pinch hitting Hunter for Bream
    late in the 10th inning.  Another hunch.  I had a vision of Bream
    winning the game on a dinger - and then he's pinch hit for.  So much
    for ESP!
    
    JD
3.605where's my violin...HAVASU::HEISERsinging thru your fingersWed Oct 23 1991 17:013
    Re: starvation
    
    kind of like Matt Sewell huh?
3.606CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 23 1991 17:081
    How many of those 13 Ks came against Minny pitchers?
3.607CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RWed Oct 23 1991 17:1813
	I have to agree with T about the idiocy of the "fans" of
	Atlanta who called Hrbek's mom and sister with threats.
	I suppose it won't be easy/possible to track 'em down, but
	it certainly does reflect on the problems some people have.
	Some people don't realize this is just a game.

	On the other hand, I don't know if I'd call a billboard
	"innocent" or not.  It seems to me from what I've hear/seen
	down here that it was hardly innocent.

	BTW, it seems that 2 radio personalities in Atlanta had encouraged
	this kind of activity (re the billboard) on the air.  They've been
	suspended from their radio station for the remainder of the Series.
3.608HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Wed Oct 23 1991 17:212
      What's the story on the billboard? I musta missed that one.
                                 Denny
3.609RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't quit the day job...Wed Oct 23 1991 17:2710
    
    Mac -
    
    Ericson is the only Minny pitcher to strike out.  Only 2 Minny pitchers
    batted all night.
    
    Hrbek and Mack and Puckett were k'd twice.  Other K victims were
    Gladden, Sorrento, Leus, Pags, Gagne and Bush...
    
    JD
3.610CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 23 1991 17:438
    FWIW,
    The Pirates fell 6,000 people short of setting the ALL-TIME attendance
    record for 4 games in a post season series.  If they had put 53k in 3
    Rivers instead of 47k, they'd own the record right now.  The record is
    held by the Dodgers, set in the Coliseum.
    
    JaKe
    
3.611DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingWed Oct 23 1991 18:338
So T,

 Are you having a good time hanging out in your sky box sipping Perrier watching
games 3,4 and 5 on a big screen tv in the Metrodome ?


Metz
3.612the billboard story is funnyANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureWed Oct 23 1991 19:1219
    >kind of like Matt Sewell huh?
    
    You calling me a *Mike* Sewell, Bob?!
    
    Starvation is a hungry subject, and I'll tellya I'm hungering
    BIG-TIME for a World Series Title.  The Mantle.  Not the Micky
    kind a mantle, the robe-style Mantle.
    
    The Braves should just enjoy it all, regale in the glory and greatness
    a it all and the Twins should take care a the other arrangments and 
    wrap up a title and the Braves will just lay back and enjoy it like 
    Bob said.
    
    re a couple back
    
    Wake up and smell the roses, RaKe.  This is no time for you to be
    bragging up Pitssburgh/Pirates baseball fans...
    
    MrT
3.613CorrectionCELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentWed Oct 23 1991 22:3018
    
    >>FWIW,
    >>The Pirates fell 6,000 people short of setting the ALL-TIME attendance
    >>record for 4 games in a post season series.  If they had put 53k in 3
    >>Rivers instead of 47k, they'd own the record right now.  The record is
    >>held by the Dodgers, set in the Coliseum.
    
    First, let me correct myself here, the Pirates would have set the NLCS
    record.  The All-Time post-season record IS held by the Dodgers, when
    they drew 3 crowds over 90,000 to the Coliseum in the 1959 World
    Series.
    
    Secondly, "T(werp)", no bragging, just reporting the numbers!!!And
    corrections when I report them wrong.  Can you say the same thing
    T(wisted)??????????
    
    JaKe
    
3.614Whats the reason??WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Thu Oct 24 1991 08:099
   >   What's the story on the billboard? I musta missed that one.
   >                              Denny


        Your not the only one. What did the billboard say that made them
    trash it?

                                                   Night Flier    ~~v~~
3.615Im not even a Baseball Fan and stayed up for the last 2 gamesMR1PST::CBULLS::MBROOKSThu Oct 24 1991 09:503
    Bottom of the ninth.....Sac Fly..Atlanta Ties it at 2 apiece.
    They have to start these games a little earlier.
    								MaB
3.616Hey MorT, I think the Braves are *enjoying it* now!AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightThu Oct 24 1991 10:321
    
3.617ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureThu Oct 24 1991 11:497
    >the Pirates would have set the NLCS record blah blah blaaah...
    
    Again, wake up call RaKe!  Earth to RaKe!  The Pirate feigns DID
    set an NLCS record: They had 7,000 to 15,000 empty seats (depending
    on whose estimate you believe) at an NLCS game, game 7 no less.
    
    MrT
3.618More heat deflectors than the space shuttleSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsThu Oct 24 1991 11:577
    What's this, T?  Using the Pittsburgh argument to detract from the
    glaring crash and burn your beloved (well, for the last few weeks anyway)
    Twins are beginning to deliver?

    Old news.

    	--dan'l
3.619they should ban DG, domes, Turf...ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureThu Oct 24 1991 12:117
    Excuse me, Dan'l.  Maybe you have one a them fliching wincing eye
    averting inferiority complexes typical to Pittsburgh feigns (who
    didn't show up and left early)... but this Series is not over.
    
    You give up to easy [sic].
    
    MrT(win TWINS)
3.620Partial re-print from BASEBALLGUSHER::WAUGAMANThu Oct 24 1991 12:1749
                            
>    First, let me correct myself here, the Pirates would have set the NLCS
>    record.  The All-Time post-season record IS held by the Dodgers, when
>    they drew 3 crowds over 90,000 to the Coliseum in the 1959 World
>    Series.

    Well, in the interests of truth in advertising, there have only
    been three 7-game series in the NLCS, so for the time being such
    a record is practically meaningless.  Pittsburgh has now finished
    second in a three-horse race, and obviously stadium size has something
    to do with the equation.
        
    Another great game, only slightly less classic than Tuesday night's
    battle.  One thing I think that should be commented on was the fine job
    home plate umpire Terry Tata did last night on those three plays at the
    plate.  We usually only hear about the umps when they affect a game
    negatively, but this guy affected the game positively by leaving no 
    doubts in anyone's mind after it was over, when it would have been easy
    and understandable to have blown that last play.  That missed-tag
    call on Lemke was *not* an obvious one.  More often that not, you'll see 
    the call made based on contact.  But under the pressure of making the
    right decision at full speed in a "sudden-death" situation in an
    all-important World Series game, Tata picked out exactly what had
    happened.
    
    I've also got to give Tim McCarver his due.  Yeah, he talks too much
    and his sense of humor is the worst.  But he knows his baseball. 
    Tuesday night he foresaw the Aguilera pinch-hit a full inning in
    advance and reported it.  Last night he immediately commented on what
    had happened on Lemke's game-winning run, before any replays were shown
    (and even though the live shot from CBS was a horrible one-- we
    viewers couldn't see what the heck was going on).  The only thing I had
    to disagree with him on was the criticism he gave Lonnie Smith for
    getting thrown out at the plate in the fifth.  Smith was making the
    correct play.  Puckett misplayed that deep drive (bad jump), and with
    nobody out, Smith wanted first and foremost to make sure that he got 
    to third.  The rest was the third-base coach's bad decision-making.
    
    Tommy Lasorda should go back home.  He's a complete embarrassment, only
    slighty less so than Sparky Anderson doing those Domino's commercials
    for his boss.  After the game, Lasorda came on and repeated
    near-verbatim McCarver's analysis of the final play.  Before the game,
    Lasorda credited Olson's hustle in taking a double on that hit to 
    centerfield in front of Puckett as the key to the Braves' win.  Uh, 
    Tommy, did you go to bed early Tuesday night?  Olson didn't even score 
    that inning.
    
    glenn
    
3.621I was in the midst of Yuppie Brave Bandwaggon WarddlersSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsThu Oct 24 1991 12:339
    I watched the game in my neighborhood bar with the sound turned down. 
    I had the pleasure of not once hearing the chop chant.  But now Glenn
    comes in here and writes that McCarver actually said something worth
    noting.  Win some, you lose some.  

    BTW, just watching LaSorda with no sound I could tell he was saying
    something completely inane.

    	--dan'l
3.623ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureThu Oct 24 1991 13:0120
    Yeah, you have to adapt to his pseudo-intellectual puns, but Tim
    McCarver is the best analyst in the game by a wide margin, with 
    Kaat probably no. 2.  What holds Kaat back is that he primarily
    announces the Twins, and in the Designated Geeky ALmost league frankly
    there isn't that much to talk about from a game strategy standpoint.
    
    A huge debate is on in the Twin Cities about the Designated Geek.
    The antis are saying "but that's the most interesting Twins game I've
    ever seen" and the devos sticking to their guns "I followed the NL
    on cable this year and all I saw was a lot of 3-2 low scoring games
    and I'd rather see Chili Davis go up there and take his cuts instead
    of an automatic out" and similar drivel.
    
    Central to this issue is the fack that no devo that I've heard has 
    ever managed to explain exactly how a low scoring game is necessarily
    less exciting.  I would think that the key to adrenaline releases 
    and synapse fires is how close and stimulating the game is, not the
    total number of runs scored.
    
    MrT(wins Twins TWINS)
3.624Braves, Twins, Twins, Braves, I'm So Confused !!QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeThu Oct 24 1991 13:0811
    
     This ones getting exciting....  I really want the MrT(wins) to
    pull this one out but I keep finding myself pulling for the Braves
    when watching the games.....  The Weather Vane could be effecting
    my loyalities.  What a great game lasted(tm) night.... I really
    won't watch B-Ball during the season but the `offs are very excitiing 
    and keep my attention....
    
    Go Braves,  Take it to seven
    
    Big game
3.625HPSRAD::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxes!Thu Oct 24 1991 13:153
       Game seven will go haid-to-haid with Giamts-Skins on Sunday night.
    Better git new batteries for the remote!
                                             Denny
3.626HERIAM::CORBETTDo you think people will ever learn?Thu Oct 24 1991 13:2414
 > Central to this issue is the fack that no devo that I've heard has 
 >   less exciting.  I would think that the key to adrenaline releases 
 >   and synapse fires is how close and stimulating the game is, not the
 >  total number of runs scored.
    

	The problem isn't that there aren't enough runs scored it's that 
2 or 3 times a game you have to watch a pitcher bat.  It's not a pretty site
and personaly I don't find it exciting.  The other day Braves had runners
in scoring position (1 and 2nd)? two out and Glavine up early in the game.
What a waste of what could be a very exciting situation, instead it's ho-hum-
pitchers-batting, end of inning.

mc
3.627I hate 7-0 8-0 might kill me !!QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeThu Oct 24 1991 13:265
    Thats for Damn Sure.....  I hate to say this and I can hardly 
    beleive it's coming outa my mouth (or is that fingers) but go
    Midgets.... crush the Foreskins !!
    
    Big Game
3.628RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't quit the day job...Thu Oct 24 1991 13:3019
     Another great game.  Watched it on TV, and had to catch some on the
    radio. 
    
    I thought the Braves were finished after the 5th inning let down and
    Pags' dinger.  But then Lonnie Smith absolutely *crushed* that ball.  
    Braves have to be a little happy with Smith and Pendleton getting two
    hits a piece - and a dinger each.
    
    Mike Stanton is pitching a whale of a series so far.  
    
    Is Pags' really that bad against lefties?  They guy was 3-3, and you
    pinch hit?  Oh well.  Is it time for Kelley to try someone else in
    right?  Mack is oh fer the series, and looking miserable.
    
    Is Saturday's game a 8:00 pm start?  I sure hope so.  I land in
    Manchester at about eight, and should make it to the hotel in time to
    catch most of the game...
    
    JD
3.629COBRA::DINSMORESay goodnight to musicThu Oct 24 1991 13:428
    big game hunter,
    
    GOOD TO SEE YA BACK IN HERE JACK, and i see youre rooting for
    
    AMERICAS TEAM. THE GIANTS  AGAINST THE FORESKINS.. good for you
    
    dinz
    
3.630CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Thu Oct 24 1991 13:489
3.631AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightThu Oct 24 1991 13:571
    	I won't say anything if you don't 'Saw...
3.632I go to watch the manger, don't you?CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 24 1991 14:277
3.633CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEThu Oct 24 1991 14:294
    Hey, isn't ANYONE gotta tell us about the billboard incident, for
    cripes sake?  
    
    lEe
3.634COBRA::DINSMORESay goodnight to musicThu Oct 24 1991 14:316
    Good question lee, i was wondering what happened to Chief Nocahoma?
    [sp]??
    
    dinz
    
    
3.635Go Braves! Do it for *REAL* Baseball!HAVASU::HEISERunborn women have rights tooThu Oct 24 1991 14:565
    I was out last night, but listened to most of the game on the radio. 
    CBS radio has Vin Scully and Johnny Bench doing the games.  It would be
    great to have Vinny paired up with McCarver.
    
    Mike
3.636I didn't hear either....GEMVAX::HILLThu Oct 24 1991 15:031
    Yeah, so what about the billboard???
3.637The Billboard Incident JARETH::MMEAGHERThu Oct 24 1991 15:044
Apparently there was a billboard with some 35,000 Twins' fans' signatures
set up at the hotel in question.  Braves fans were spray painting on
the billboard, and the hotel had it removed.  I think the Globe said that
there was paint damage to the area around the billboard/sign.
3.638Fork(lift) YouSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsThu Oct 24 1991 15:278
>    Is Saturday's game a 8:00 pm start?  I sure hope so.  I land in
>    Manchester at about eight, and should make it to the hotel in time to
    
    You mean you're not driving the forklift cross countr?  What kinda
    manly man are you, JD?  
    
    	--dan'l
    
3.639RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't quit the day job...Thu Oct 24 1991 16:2213
    When Willard came up to pinch hit, and McCarver started rattling off
    all the places that Willard had played in the minors, I started
    thinking of the scene in Bull Durham when they are on the bus, and he's
    telling the kids about his time in the 'Show'.   I thought about
    Willard, on a bus somewhere next year or whenever, with young minor
    leaguers around him, as he tells them about the time he pinch hit in
    the WORLD SERIES in the SHOW and drove in the winning run.  
    
    Classic stuff.
    
    Man - that guy just about played everywhere!
    
    JD
3.640Go MiDgEtS.... JuSt ThIs TiMe !!QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeThu Oct 24 1991 16:528
    Hey  DiNzY....   Good to hear from ya....  Thouoght you might
    have EnDed Up wIth HoFFa iN The mIdGets EndzOne fOr a WhiLe
    tHere...  hOw yoU BEen aNyHoW ???  I aM Only RoOting fOr The
    MidGets beCauSe tHey aRe PlAyinG tH Skins....  BTW I rETrAcT
    my statemeNt Regarding my NiCk naMe fOr The SkIns....  WouLdn'T
    waNt tO OFfenD aNy OnE.....
    
    Big Game
3.641ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureThu Oct 24 1991 17:3216
    >I weould imagine that non-circumcised men would have a problem
    >with this name, feeling that it's discirminatory in nature.....
    
    Damn right.  I as a uncircumcised human male found Dinsmore's 
    wisecrack offensive, obscene, humiliating, and discriminatory.
    
    How would you guys with pink bulbs like it if we natural men went
    off talking about Mushroom Sticks?
    
    re: billboard
    
    The vandalism took place soon after two DJs on Power 99 in Atlanta
    called out its location and urged that it be vandalized.  Within the
    hour the thing was trashed.  Must be a big-time radio station...
    
    MrT
3.642Watch It !!!QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeThu Oct 24 1991 17:383
    T....  that was pretty offensive...   ;^)  I'm Howling  !!!
    
    Big Game
3.643Now we know where "T" gets cheese for his crackersCELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentThu Oct 24 1991 17:505
    
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.644Some frank talk about sex and sex partsANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureThu Oct 24 1991 18:2615
    RaKe, it sez a lot about your habits and expectancies pertaining
    to personal hygiene that you would automatically assume a hooded 
    snake would necessarily go uncleaned.  Funny thing, though, it's 
    a fack that natural men make better lovers.  Why?  Simple: The 
    glans goes protected by the hood, and many many nerve endings in 
    it are not inured by constant contact caused by rubbing with clothes.  
    When unsheathed, it's like a uncalloused finger, smooth, sensitive, 
    alert, feeling, ready to respond to the tiniest hint, the faintest
    signal, ready to learn, ready to please... 
    
    MrT
    MrT
    
    
    
3.645Dr. RuThSHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsThu Oct 24 1991 18:334
    T, please list references including names, phone numbers, dates, and
    times or else we ain't believin' this stunt either.
    
    	--dan'l
3.646Dan'l's been listening to Voice of the Beehive, eh ?DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingThu Oct 24 1991 18:3913
Was Jane doing the chop lasted night after she begged forgivness and swore to
never do it again?

I couldda sworn they cut to her and Ted and both were doing it. However they
had added an extra hook such that their hands came down on thier legs like they
were clapping hand to leg or something...maybe they were just doing touchy -
feeley stuff where the camera couldn't see them....

Hand check.....

Metz
 
3.647CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 24 1991 19:161
    T, take it to the Just Ask Jake topic...
3.648QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeThu Oct 24 1991 19:194
     Boy...  This conference is getting pretty close to the edge
    with that kind of talk.
    
    Big Game
3.649;-)HAVASU::HEISERunborn women have rights tooThu Oct 24 1991 20:158
    What he's really saying is he couldn't please a real main's way without
    his built-in Maintain(tm). 
    
    Takes a real main to do it the old-fashioned way and still achieve
    great results and success.
    
    Thank you all,
    Mike
3.650CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentThu Oct 24 1991 21:3927
    
    >>RaKe, it sez a lot about your habits and expectancies pertaining
    >>to personal hygiene that you would automatically assume a hooded 
    >>snake would necessarily go uncleaned.  
    
    No assumption of the sort made at all.  Just a brilliant deduction
    based on the BS you spew forth in this notesfile.  Can only ba caused
    by that.
    
    
    >>When unsheathed, it's like a uncalloused finger, smooth, sensitive, 
    >>alert, feeling, ready to respond to the tiniest hint, the faintest
    >>signal, ready to learn, ready to please... 
    
    The lightest touch of a right hand!!!!(or left if'n T is a southpaw)
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
    MrT
    MrT
    
    
    

    
3.651ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureFri Oct 25 1991 01:225
    Hey, don't blame *me* guys.  Dinsmore came in with talking foreskins
    and then the inimitable RaKe went off about haid cheese and all I
    did was straighten things out.
    
    MrT
3.652CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentFri Oct 25 1991 01:2413
    
    >>								and all I
    >>did was straighten things out.                          
    
    >>MrT
    
    We're not concerned with what you did in the stall!!!!
    
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.653*AHEM*AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightFri Oct 25 1991 09:2815
           <<< CAM::SYS$SYSDEVICE:[NOTES$LIBRARY]SPORTS_91.NOTE;1 >>>
               -< CAM::SPORTS -- Digital's Daily Sports Tabloid >-
================================================================================
Note 3.525               The National League (Baseball)               525 of 652
AXIS::ROBICHAUD "Doin' the Tomahawk Chop"             6 lines  21-OCT-1991 09:58
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    	Iron City is a good beer.  Figures MorT wouldn't like it.  MorT's
    like those Viking fans who came to Foxboro with parkas and huge
    blankets to guard against the 50 degree weather yesterday.  Braves
                                                                ^^^^^^
    take three in a row in Hotlanta.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    				/Don
3.655Back to the Hump for more baggie-ball :-(GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Oct 25 1991 11:2120
    
    The Twins have got to be thanking their lucky stars that, like in
    1987, they've got four games of spamball in the Series at that 
    miserable, wretched Metrodome of theirs.  Once again, they've 
    *proven* that they're abject failures when it comes to playing our 
    national pastime, baseball, the way it's meant to be played.
    Discriminating baseball fans (minus MrT) won't forget that, 
    regardless of how this thing plays out.  
                      
    All was not a total loss last night, though.  Tom Kelly was finally
    able to make his peace with NL baseball, when, frustrated and frazzled
    from the two nights previous, he had his #3 hitter Kirby Puckett
    sacrificing in the fourth inning.  Sure, it was premature, foolish,
    stupid, and an obvious sign of overcompensation bordering on
    surrender, but at least they wouldn't be able to say that ol' Tom
    wasn't trying to "make something happen", the NL way.  Kudos, Tom!  
    (Haw, haw, haw...)
    
    glenn
    
3.656ooh, but he did it firstCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 25 1991 11:417
3.657I have new respect (kind of) for TommySHALOT::MEDVIDthere are monsters there are angelsFri Oct 25 1991 11:4213
    I thought the highlight last night was when LaSorda came right out and
    said, "American League managers don't have to think.  They can call in
    their moves."
    
    Jack Buck turns around and says, "Tommy, you're not suggesting AL
    managers don't have to think strategy."
    
    "What do they have to think about?" LaSorda replied.
    
    All of a sudden, Tommy was gone.  That's right, CBS, as soon as someone
    is telling it like it is, shut him up.
    
    	--dan'l
3.658Anyone care to spell out the T.H. CHOP?CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Fri Oct 25 1991 11:5610
Yaiiiiiiiihahoyooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!

Hahayoo!! Ha ayayoooooooo.HA ha hahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

What a scalpin! 8^)



Steve
3.659TKOD strikes again ...CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RFri Oct 25 1991 12:0823
	I think there may be some sort of delayed Mr.T(LOSEs)
	kiss-of-death.

	I seem to remember T jumping on the North Stars band wagon
	in the conference finals last spring.  The Stars were able to
	shake off the added strain against Edmonton, but in the next
	series they succumbed to the Penguins after an early series lead.

	Now, he jumps on the Twins band wagon just before the ALCS vs
	Toronto.  The light-hitting Blue Jays weren't able to take
	advantage of the situation, but here we are in the "finals" one
	series later, and the added strain of supporting T has caused
	the Twins to wear down as well.

	Gives you a lot more respect for Bobby Knight.  Look how well he
	has done all these years with the T.KOD hanging over him.  Of course,
	we all understand that while T has made predictions about the Twins
	and North Stars taking it all, he has never made such a prediction
	about the Hoosiers, 'cause they are a_flat-footed bunch, with no
	height, everyone out of position, etc., etc., etc., who couldn't
	make it through a season without the kindly, masterful Bob Knight
	at the helm.  I suppose if he actually predicts a Hoosiers champeenship,
	they'd choke as well.
3.662FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Oct 25 1991 12:325
    Twins have never won a World Series game on the road - lost all 3 in LA
    in 1965, 3 in St Louis in 1967 and 3 in Atlanta in 1991.  The only home
    WS Loss they've ever had was Game 7 to Koufax (on short rest) in 1965.
    
    John
3.663FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Oct 25 1991 12:334
    That 1967 in the previous note should of course be 1987.  Sorry.  Lousy
    lines to conference from here in Beffa (not to be confused with Meffa).
    
    John
3.664COBRA::DINSMORESay goodnight to musicFri Oct 25 1991 12:427
    thanks tommy,youre right, i love that tune, but i do go to sleep
    
    with radio on.. good writing. must be the littleton air huh?
    
    
    dinz
    
3.666AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightFri Oct 25 1991 12:525
    	From what Jo* told me about MrT's uh, girth when he jumps on
    a bandwagon it puts quite a strain on the suspension system.  Maybe
    that's why the wheels came off in Hotlanta?
    
    				/Don
3.667You could see his throat tighten=Deano56719::LEARYBetter than LDSFri Oct 25 1991 12:5311
    Why Tommy,
    I believe that many of us( you and me included) have mucho writin'
    skills. I'm practicin' fer my next profession, beat writer for
    the National Enquirer. I cain butcher with best of dem.
    
    BTW,
    Good thing the Braves won 'cuz i was about ta call Glavine the
    "Roger Clemens" of the post-season.
    
    MikeL
    
3.668BSS::JCOTANCHFri Oct 25 1991 13:055
    Too bad CBS didn't show the crowd in the HHH Dome last night like they
    did in game 3.  Would've loved to see all those long-faced Twinkie fans
    sitting on their hands.
    
    Joe
3.670they all went home after the 4th...CNTROL::CHILDSEver meet a weak Ape?Fri Oct 25 1991 13:089
   >> Too bad CBS didn't show the crowd in the HHH Dome last night like they
   >> did in game 3.  Would've loved to see all those long-faced Twinkie fans
   >> sitting on their hands.
    
    Joe
	
 We're talking Twins' fan here Joe.

 mike
3.671Baseball's been *great*-- hope they retire the rest of the actGUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Oct 25 1991 13:3223
    
>               -< Wish the Braves phans would sit on their tomahawks... >-
 
    Gotta agree-- especially for a first-time thing where there should
    be nothing but fun involved for the fans for just being there for 
    once-- the behavior from the Atlanta fans has been disturbing.  
    Yeah, I understand that the death threats and the billboard thing 
    are the work of a very small but sick minority, but this constant 
    booing and taunting of Hrbek ("How do you spell fat boy? H-R-B-E-K"
    --they allowed that sign?) for doing nothing more than making a 
    major-league play (behind all the tomahawks and chanting do these 
    people have a clue about how the game of baseball is played?) and 
    what I perceive to be an antagonistic attitude on this Indian issue 
    from the newspapers and fans at the park (no matter which side of
    the issue you're on) is "fun" just taken a bit too far.  And of
    course, Ted and Jane have provided themselves to *everyone*-- 
    conservatives, liberals, Indians, non-Indians, baseball fans, baseball 
    haters, you name it-- as ready targets for scorn.  It's a circus
    outta control...
    
    glenn
    
    
3.672Lighten up on both sidesGEMVAX::HILLFri Oct 25 1991 13:4414
    Yeah, I have to agree it seems a little sophmoric of the Braves' fans
    to chant "Cheater, Cheater" when Hrbek gets up. Sure, boo the guy or
    whatever because he's the other team, but geez, if it was a Brave who
    made that play they would have cheered him. All he did was get away
    with a arguably shaky move. It wasn't as if he cheap-shotted someone or
    deliberately tried to injure another player, or even whined to the
    press. Give him a break!
    
    As for the tomahawk chop, I can understand how powerful it can be to be
    part of a huge throng of voices like that. More than anything else, it
    reminds me of how soccer crowds in Europe are always chanting or
    singing something during the game. Let 'em have their fun!
    
    Tom 
3.673CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Fri Oct 25 1991 13:4713

	A Aaaaa Aaaaa Aaaaaaa
	Aaaa Aa Aa Aaaaaaa

(* 1000)


Damn, that is infectious.  Speaking strictly from a psychological
viewpoint, it's amazing how much those Indian chants stir inside
you, how very primal they can be....

Intense.....
3.674AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightFri Oct 25 1991 14:037
    	Well at least the Twins feigns could use those HomerHankies
    as an expensive cryin' towel last night.
    
    				/Don
    
    P.S. I hope my good buddy MorT didn't get sick chowing down on that
          spam feast in the luxury box last night...
3.675Added reflections ...SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Fri Oct 25 1991 14:1560
 How come all the high-brow complaints about the Braves fans' behavior in
 the stands, their banners, and the high-profile owner and his equally
 famous fiancee ???
 
 There have been other teams whose fans have enjoyed the game as a
 coordinated group, most notably the Twins fans who all wave
 corporate-sponsored hankies.   
 
 And how about the 1979 Pirates with 50,000+ fans singing "We Are
 Fam-A-Lee" ???   Don't remember too many complaints about them not having
 a clue about how the game was played.
 
 And the "FATBOY" banner was truly classless, no doubt about it.   So why
 did CBS show it then ???   What brain-dead bozo in the CBS control truck
 whispered in the cameraman's ear to focus on the banner so he could punch
 it up for all to see ???
 
 And Ted and Jane are no more a "circus" act than Marge Schott and her late
 pooch were lasted year or ol' Charlie Finley and his green pennant-waving
 crew seen at all the early '70s A's post-season games.    Geez, remember
 when Finley "fired" Mike Andrews after he booted a crucial extra-inning
 play ???  And we saw plenty (too much) of Steinbrenner in all those
 Yankees games too.  Didn't he want to can a third base coach (Ferraro?)
 for waving Willie Randolph home when he should have held him ???
 
 Haven't seen Jane or Ted make a pitching change yet, have we ???
 
 The Braves have absolutely electrified Atlanta, the state of Georgia, the
 entire Southeast section of the country and a good deal of the rest of the
 free world, too.    Methinks the fans of other teams whose players are on
 the golf links right now are just a little green with envy.    Yes, it is
 true that the oh-so-knowledgeable fans of the Red Sox, the Yankees, the
 Reds, and so on would not be caught dead doing silly things like the wave
 or the chop or the hanky thing but I can assure you they'd all love to be
 in the Braves seat right now.
 
 The eerie resemblance to the 1987 Series is certainly there and the Braves
 need to prepare for it.   These nexted two games in the Dome are not at
 all easy despite all their momentum and the advantageous "on paper"
 pitching matchups.
 
 But there is another eerie "deja vu" going on here, too ... We're seeing
 the 1969 Amazin' Mets all over again.   Think about it ... 
 
 Three young pitching studs ... Seaver, Koosman, Gentry and Glavine, Avery,
 Smoltz.  Totally unexpected "little guy" heroes ... Al Weis and Mark
 Lemke.    Dismal recent past histories ... Mets and Braves last place
 finishes for several years.   And on and on ... Ron Gant looks like Tommy
 Agee out there sometimes.   The well-traveled Lonnie Smith is cranking
 dingers outta there like ol' Donn Clendenon did.
 
 Yes, the 1991 Twins are not the juggernaut that the 1969 Orioles were so
 the Braves aren't doing a David and Goliath thing here but their "miracle"
 is no less stunning.
 
 And, yes, I thought the Twins would win it easily after going up 2-0.  Now
 I ain't so sure.  Shoulda stuck to the "Make no predictions, eat no crow"
 philosophy.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.676RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't quit the day job...Fri Oct 25 1991 14:2936
    Bob -
    
    Hit it right on the head.  Once again, and I'm sorry folks, we have
    what I'll call "Northeast snobbery" getting down on fans from other
    teams.  My long-standing fued (for want of a better term) with 'boston'
    fans is just that attitude.  The attitude that "Only we know how to be
    politically correct in rooting for out teams..."  We've seen it many
    ways in this notesfile over the years  (and in others).  
    
    Being at a Sox game in the late 70's and having fans chant "Yankees
    S*uck" or tauning Darryl Porter or Jim Eisenreich ar always forgotten.
    The Lawwy Biwd "Moses Eat Sh*T" comment is passed off (by the same
    folks who get all over Isiah for smiling...)
    
    Happens all the time.  The Hrbek sign was classless and should  never
    have been shown by CBS.  Some of the other Hrbek signs seemed to fall
    more into the 'having fun' category.  And while you may say Kent's act
    at first with Gant was just baseball the way it should be played, it
    should have been called as interference or something like that - and it
    was the cheapest shot of the series.   Red Sox fans chanted Darryl
    Strawberry's name for his doing less.  The chanted Steroids at Jose
    Canseco.  
    
    And what have Jane and Ted done?  Is it really there fault that CBS
    shows them?   Heck Ted Turner owns the team - and I'd rather see and
    Jane than Marge, George or Jean Yawkey or Gene Autry or especially Ed
    DeBartelo.
    
    The fans certainly *seem* to be having GADS of fun at the game.  And
    they certainly seem to know baseball.  
    
    I could do without the tomahawks or the constant war hoop.  But its
    there, and more than likely, it will disappear after this year is over.
    
    
    JD
3.677Lemke's the MVPHAVASU::HEISERunborn women have rights tooFri Oct 25 1991 14:306
    What about the game?  Was that a clinic or what!?!
    
    Atlanta's bats came to life at just the right time, hopefully they're
    just as productive in Minny.
    
    Mike
3.678COBRA::DINSMORESay goodnight to musicFri Oct 25 1991 14:3816
    Good analogies  bob, all this crap comes down too is just
    
    dwelling on negative stuff, not trying to look at the good things
    
    going on in the world, people not really looking inside
    
    themselves, they are taking focus off strengthing thir own weaknesses
    
    and in the long run, jsut lowering themselves individually
    
    
    AND  as always this is just my opinion
    
    
    Jim
    
3.679STRATA::CAPPELSmelts are a wonderful fishFri Oct 25 1991 14:406
    Well said Bob Hunt,
    
    Watching the Braves play has been FUN and for the first time in several
    years I've really enjoyed the baseball season, playoff and World
    Series.
    
3.680CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEFri Oct 25 1991 14:425
    Way to throw everyone into one classification, JD.
    
    Based on your note, you must be ecstatic to be out of Boston, huh?
    
    Lee
3.681RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JODon't quit the day job...Fri Oct 25 1991 14:479
    Lee -
    
    Actually, I miss Boston.  So I'll qualify it with *some* so as not to
    offend the noters in here, who of course, cheer correctly.  ;-)
    
    For economic reasons, I sure am glad to be out of Boston, however.  Fro
    family, friends and baseball on grass, I'm not...
    
    JD
3.682AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightFri Oct 25 1991 14:595
    	Congrats JD!  Once again you prove adept at taking any topic
    and twisting it around to trash Boston fans.  A truly amazing talent!
    Bravo!
    
    				/Don
3.683They ought sell a few thousand season tickets off that one...CNTROL::CHILDSEver meet a weak Ape?Fri Oct 25 1991 15:096
 Quick somebody get a frame for 678....

 Well said Sir Robert....

 mike
3.686More ...SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Fri Oct 25 1991 15:2333
 I wasn't trying to explicitly trash any team's fans, least of all the Red
 Sox.   {Remember I jumped on the Bosox bandwagon when my Phutile Phillies
 gave up the ghost early in the 1988 season.}  Each team's fans are
 incredibly different.    

 "Group" things like the chop or the hankies don't happen in Fenway.   
 And, yes, you can make the argument the Red Sox fans are mentally more
 "into" the game for just the game's sake alone than the choppers and the
 hanky wavers are.   But so what ????

 you won't find an anatomically correct inflatable doll in the Dome or in
 Fulton County Stadium either.    Just isn't done.    

 No one team's fans are *better* than another.  They're just different.  
 Boston has a trail of tears that's deeper than the ocean ... each
 successive BoSox season is a continuation of a tragi-comic passion play.  

 Atlanta has had precious little to even break a sweat over.  They had the
 1969 NL West Division, Hank Aaron's 715th dinger, Phil Neikro, and the
 1982 Dale Murphy NL West flag.    That's it.    This is their all-time
 zenith.  They're doing the chop now because they have nowhere near the
 long-term *affinity* for the game that exists in Boston.    But they also
 don't share the Boston "tragedy" complex as well.

 Only one thing is for sure.    Every single Red Sox fan and every single
 fan of every other major league baseball team would right now *LOVE* to be
 up 3 games to 2 in the 1991 World Series.    Their methods of expressing
 that joy would all be vastly different ... but the joy and anticipation
 would be there nonetheless.   Bosox fans can *NOT* rationalize away that
 envy no matter how silly the chop might be.    On that note, JD is right.

 Bob Hunt
 
3.687More "snobbery"GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Oct 25 1991 15:4334
    
    Hey, relax guys.  I never said that Boston fans have never exhibited
    classlessness-- they certainly have and in many more ways than we're
    seeing now.  So what?  Why can't anyone make a simple, unqualified
    statement without hearing screams of "Northeast bias!" or "Rampant
    political correctness!" in return (hey, JD, why can't Washington
    Huskies' fans enjoy their team without you making fun of their
    clothing, etc.?).
    
    I'm very much jealous of the Braves' fans right now.  Because of
    the team.  Because of the baseball.  Not because I'd want to join
    them in slapping on a headdress or wielding a tomahawk.  Rather, 
    because my team right now would be on the verge of taking baseball's 
    biggest prize in the finest way possible-- by coming back from the
    worst record of all 26 teams in the previous year!  Think about that.  
    It's an astounding proposition, one that doesn't need any extra 
    adornment.
    
    The charge stands-- there's an awful lot of people having a good
    time now, some less than graciously, that didn't care one bit about
    the Atlanta Braves until late this season and, in my mind, are now
    pushing the limits of good taste.  ("Go Braves-- and take the Falcons 
    with you!"  Pretty much sums up the past sentiment, right?)  You guys 
    want to debate what other teams have experienced the same fan
    behavior, or what evil motivates me to reach this astounding
    conclusion, have at it.  I'm enjoying what's going on *down on the 
    field* just the same...
                                            
    And no, my assertion doesn't apply to everyone.  Matter of fact,
    over the past few years, I'd kind of almost figured that most all
    the fans of the Atlanta Braves worked for DEC...  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
3.688Buckner,Stanley,Gedman,Burton,Dent,GibsonCTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSFri Oct 25 1991 15:4414
    Bob and JD,
    You guys are right about one thing. This Bosox fan is extremely
    envious. But jest cuz I think the way Atlantans and Minnysodans are 
    celebratin' seems seely don't make it "Northeast snobbery".
     Don't generalize.
    I'm sure those good people would think the way we celebrate are silly.
    Diffrent strokes, not snobbery.
    And I DO remember how it feels to be up 3-2 in the Series.
    Unfortunately I remember how dat story ended and is the reason I am
    now reachin' for the valiums. 8^)
    
    MikeL
    
    
3.689Go Braves!RHETT::KNORRCarolina BlueFri Oct 25 1991 15:471
    
3.690AXIS::CHAPPELCurly Q. LinkFri Oct 25 1991 16:0030
3.691RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOBeam Gene up, Scotty!Fri Oct 25 1991 16:0031
    Glenn and Mike -
    
    I Used "Northeast Snobbery" cuz I saw it in a note by I think Tom B. -
    I didn't make it up - just used his term.  
    
    Hey, I like to have the Red Sox and/or Mets in the Series right now. 
    The Braves are a good story, and have loads of likeable guys on the
    team (NO Darryl Strawberry's, etc...) - including personal favorites
    such as Sid Bream.   The Twins are good copy too, take away the disdain
    for the Dome they play in, and they also have loads of likeable guys -
    and personal favorites like Morris, Hrbek, and Aggie.
    
    As I said, I could do without hankies, tomahawks, headresses, paws,
    whatever - but I would rather see a loud crowd then a sit on the hands
    type crowd...
    
    Glenn - I may make fun of the Huskies' fans clothing (and other stuff
    like knitted window shades for clothes), but I've never said they
    werent' good fans.  They are incredibly rabid, and are starved for a
    winner.  I think Pete Crouch understands I'm mostly yanking his chain
    when I blast the Huskies.  If they win the title - which I think they
    will, I won't begrudge the fans - nor will I take part in any
    celebrations.   I'll just brace for the opening of spring football
    practice, which will push baseball news to the classified section...
    
    And - also, I don't make fun of the fans wearing purple and gold to the
    games - that's normal.   It's wearing it at all times that's funny -
    that and the upscale stores jumping on the bandwagon with tres chic
    Husky apparal - now that's funny, IMO.
    
    JD
3.693RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOSET HAWK/PARTY=WIFYOUFri Oct 25 1991 18:467
    Tommy -
    
    I figured folks, especiallly Glenn W., would have already say your note
    about 'Northeast Snobbery'.  You came up with it Buddy, don't pass it
    off on me.
    
    JD
3.695CELTIK::JACOBLoad SpentFri Oct 25 1991 19:5215
 
>> And the "FATBOY" banner was truly classless, no doubt about it.   So why

I agree.  The classless thing about it was that the put the wrong name on it.
Should've been Kirby "Pizza" Pudgett.

>> "Group" things like the chop or the hankies don't happen in Fenway.   

Nah, I concur, Fenway's "Group" things involve an inflatable doll and 55 gallon
drum of "Veinerschlider 50"!!!

(8^)*

JaKe

3.696Braves blow Game 6; Twins enjoy Dome cookin'SLICER::HUNTTed, that's a Rolls Royce !!!Sun Oct 27 1991 18:3826
 Game 6 of the World Series is in the books.   An all-time classic.   This
 whole Series is perhaps the best since the epic 1975 Reds-Bosox struggle.
 
 Bobby Cox should be taken out and shot on the spot for even *thinking* of
 putting Charlie Leibrandt in to face Kirby Puckett and the meat of the
 Twins lineup.   First mistake was wasting his closer, Alejandro Pena, in a
 tied ballgame but to leave three other very good relievers (Mark Wohlers,
 Kent Mercker, and Jim Clancy) on ice and go with an ineffective Game 1
 starter was unforgivable.   Might have even been worse than Snuffy would
 have ever done.  Puckett quickly put Cox out of his misery.
 
 Braves came razor-thin close on so many occasions.  Pendleton and Justice
 hit balls that were foul by inches and several others smoked line drives
 right at the perfectly placed Twins fielders.    Brian Harper made the
 throw of his life to nail Keith Mitchell on an 11th inning steal attempt.
 
 No predictions whatsoever for Game 7.   The Braves have all they need to
 win the game and now so do the Twins.   I can't resist one jab at the
 Twins, though.   If they do win, they deserve congratulations but you just
 have to wonder if they can win a Series in an even-numbered year with only
 three games max in the Dome.    For the Twins, there truly is no place
 like Dome.
 
 Should be a great game.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.697Updates on game #7 tonight?WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Sun Oct 27 1991 23:2910
                    -< Could someone keep game #7 updated? >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       If anyone is out there tonight could you please keep me and maybe
    others updated throughout game #7? It would be greatly appreciated!!

       Great game #6. Best series I have seen in years! I sure wish I
    could watch game #7. Good luck to both teams and their fans.

                                                   Night Flier    ~~v~~
3.6983rd inning updateLAVETA::J_PARSONSGeorge Stark: Not A Very Nice GuyMon Oct 28 1991 00:281
    Game 7: No score, bottom of 3rd. Braves have stranded 3, Twins 2
3.699thank you!!!!WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Mon Oct 28 1991 01:104
    Thanks allot for the update!!! 


                                       Night Flier   ~~v~~
3.7006th inning updateLAVETA::J_PARSONSGeorge Stark: Not A Very Nice GuyMon Oct 28 1991 01:241
    Bottom of 6th: Still no score. Braves have now stranded 6 or 7.
3.701Into the 9th now...LAVETA::J_PARSONSGeorge Stark: Not A Very Nice GuyMon Oct 28 1991 02:192
    Going into the 9th: Still no score! Both teams had the bases loaded in
    the 8th but couldn't score. 
3.702WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Mon Oct 28 1991 02:424
         What a game! Wish I could see it.  Thanks for the updates!

                                                   Night Flier   ~~v~~
3.703It's overLAVETA::J_PARSONSGeorge Stark: Not A Very Nice GuyMon Oct 28 1991 03:051
    Twins win 1-0 in 10. Best series game I've ever seen...
3.704WLDWST::RCARRUTHERSNight Flier: ~~v~~Mon Oct 28 1991 03:0911

            Wow!!! Thanks for all of your updates! Thank goodness there are
    VCR's!  Nobody looses in this World Series. They should be considered
    co-champions!

            I guess the Twins had it all figured out....just go out and win
    all 4 at home. What a streak that is. Wonder when the next time they
    will get the chance to continue it?

                                                   Night Flier    ~~v~~
3.705Tigers in '92CSLALL::TIMMONSHELP SET PROFILEMon Oct 28 1991 10:0313
    Wow!  It may not have been *THE* best series ever, but it sure has to
    be *ONE OF THE* best.  Best I've ever seen anyway.
    
    Goats, heros, great pitching overall, wonderful defensive plays
    (Puckett's catch will be a highlight somewhere), strategic failures and
    successes, *NO*, I repeat *NO* wacky owners taking headlines, no
    personality blowups.  
    
    Baseball as it was meant to be played. 
    
    Congrats to Twins AND Braves fans.
    
    lEe
3.706CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Mon Oct 28 1991 10:3013
While I'm somewhat bummed that the Twins won (was rooting for Atlanta kinda
because they've never won before), I have to admit that it was one of
baseball's all-time greatest games....

Too bad it was tainted by being inside a plastic bag, played on artificial
turf, with such a travesty as the designated hitter.....8^(


Forget his name, but that guy who blew the baserunning for Atlanta must
feel lower than a whale's belly today......


'Saw
3.707Hit Smith over da haid with a tomahawk!CUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Mon Oct 28 1991 11:1011
'Saw, it was Lonnie Smith, a vetran of past World Series, who made
the stooooooooooopidiest base running blunder in the history of 
the Series. I couldn't believe it. What a shame. Oh well congrats
to the Twinkies, and ecspecially to Jack Morris who proved himself 
as one of the all-time great pitchers in baseball. Gee I wonder if 
Lou Gorman coulda signed Morris?



Steve
3.708More reflections...GUSHER::WAUGAMANMon Oct 28 1991 11:1252
    
    It was the best Series I've ever seen, including 1975.
    
    Very tough luck for the Braves in Game 6.  After that, with Jack Morris
    (who in my mind just sealed his spot in Cooperstown last night) going, 
    I didn't have a good feeling for the Braves in Game 7.  Scott
    Erickson demonstrated in Game 6 what is a truism of baseball in the 
    short run: sometimes it really is better to be lucky than good.  But 
    hey, it's not like the Braves didn't have their share of luck in the 
    games in Atlanta.  That's just the way it goes.  It couldn't have been 
    any closer...
    
    It's unfortunate that Lonnie Smith is probably going to be forever
    remembered as the guy who let the 1991 World Series slip away, because
    I think it's unjustified.  Not to excuse Smith completely, but he made
    an error of commission just like any other, not a mental error, when he 
    failed to pick up Pendleton's hit to the gap.  The absolute worst 
    mistake to make in that situation is getting thrown out on the bases 
    somewhere by running recklessly, not failing to score.  Second and third 
    and the Braves couldn't bring Smith in?  But who will remember Gant and 
    Bream's very feeble attempts to do so years from now?  Most won't, but 
    they should... 
    
    This Series demonstrated to me again why baseball is the best game in
    the world.  The anxiety and anticipation on every pitch, the tension
    during the periods of inactivity that are so often criticized for being
    "boring", are unparalleled by anything in any other game I know of. 
    It really is tough to imagine how these guys can cope with that kind of
    late game pressure and still execute at the top of their games (and,
    yes, occasionally they don't).  Stuff like Bobby Cox having the guts to
    walk the bases full and leave it up to Mike Stanton to throw strikes or 
    lose the game (I was screaming at Cox for that one!).  But Stanton came 
    through, as did Jack Morris in the top of the inning and as did
    Alejandro Pena an inning later.  Makes you shake your head in
    wonderment...
    
    On a lighter note, in between innings Saturday night did anybody
    else catch SNL's opening monologue?  The host (whose name eludes
    me) was trying to get the production crew to roll a tape of a Jack
    Nicholson sketch or something, but to no avail.  He heads up to
    the booth to see what the hell's going on, and there's the entire
    crew in a trance, watching the Braves' game, chanting and waving 
    foam tomahawks.  When he frantically returns to the stage, the 
    entire audience is doing the same.  He goes backstage and the SNL 
    staff is also transfixed and unresponsive, including special guest 
    John McLaughlin (the *real* one, not Dana Carvey's creation).  
    Finally McLaughlin tells the guy that he makes a better door than a 
    window and to get the hell out of the way of the TV.  It was priceless!
    
    glenn
    
    
3.709CSOA1::BACHTHE Chicago Bear FanMon Oct 28 1991 11:171
    RE: .708 Christen Slater
3.710CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 28 1991 11:214
3.711CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 28 1991 11:315
    Last night was an example of the way baseball should be played, with no
    interference from some guy to old to play the game anymore.  The best
    players were out there doing what they do best.  If this game had been
    in Atlanta, you'd have seen Kelly forced to pinch hit for his best
    pitcher instead of leaving him in to finish a 10 inning masterpiece.
3.713GRANPA::DFAUSTDon't drink the KoolaidMon Oct 28 1991 11:4513
    
    re: Lonnie Smith
    
    I'm not sure it was a rotten play by Smith so much as it was a
    combination of the Dome and Knoblach. From what I've heard (since I've
    never been there) it's almost impossible to pick up the ball if you
    lose track of it (esp. if you don't play there very often). Couple that
    with the terrific fake by the Twinkies 2Baseman and you get one very
    confused Lonnie Smith. That was a dandy play by the rookie to get Smith
    to slide and lose the chance at scoring.
    
    Dennis
    
3.714the DH sucks...CNTROL::CHILDSEver meet a weak Ape?Mon Oct 28 1991 11:5415
 One correction Dennis, Smith never slide he just rounded second and held up
 there confused bewilder and unaware of where the ball was. While Morris was
 a decent choice, I'd have given the MVP to Knoblock. He did all the little
 things throughout the series getting clutch hits, moving runners along and
 making the plays in the field and the fake saved the bacon...

 good point Sir Robert. all that will be remebered is Smith and Gant and
 Bream deserve as much BLAM (tm). Bream was pretty bad throughout. Reminded
 me of Winfield at the plate a few years back.

 Mac BS cause if Kelly had pinchit for Morris chances are that they would 
 have won the ballgame in regulation.

 mike
3.715ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYCarolina BlewMon Oct 28 1991 12:1017
    re .711
    
    No, what you woulda had last night in the absence of the Designated
    Geek would've been strategy manifesting itself in about the sixth inning
    in addition to all the drama.  
    
    ALmost "fans" never quit in their defense of the indefensible.  Today,
    it's that we woulda been robbed of Morris' "masterpiece."  Funny thing,
    though, these same ALmost people routinely decry low scoring games just
    like the one we had last night.
    
    This Series, perhaps the best in history, stands as an advertisement of
    why the Geek should be done away with.  Game 3 is probably the best 
    single baseball game ever, and it's no coincidence that it happened in
    Atlanta.
    
    MrT(wins)
3.716great series,kudos to both teamsCTHQ3::LEARYBetter than LDSMon Oct 28 1991 12:227
    I'll go with deep-sixin the DH
    Let's take it a step further and demolish all monstrosities like
    the 'Dome. Baseball wasn't meant to be played in such plastic
    environment.
    
    MikeL
    
3.717CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Mon Oct 28 1991 12:3820
Hawk,

If baseball wasn't such a money hungry sport, and they didn't have to
have three kazillion playoff games, the games would be played earlier
in October.  


I'm disappointed the Braves lost.  I was rooting for them for
several reasons:  a) they've never won, b) they play REAL baseball,
c) they play in a stadium with natural turf, and no plastic garbage bag
overhead...

But the Twins won, and congrats to them.

I've never seen such an evenly matched series.  For two teams to battle
to the 10th inning in the 7th game, and then have the series decided
by ONE run, is a thing of beauty.


'Saw
3.718Kids can't see late gamesGEMVAX::HILLMon Oct 28 1991 12:5014
    re playoff games
    
    "If baseball wasn't such a money hungry sport" they would play at least 
    the weekend games in the daytime. The  way CBS and NBC alternate for
    the late football double-headers, there's no reason why CBS couldn't
    have a 1 pm football game and the WS start at 4-4:30-5:00.
    
    This was, if not THE, certainly ONE OF THE best World Series in the 
    history of the game. It's too bad not too many 10 year old kids got 
    to see any of it first hand. Weeknight games make sense, but on the 
    weekend, there's no excuse. They are killing the future fan base by 
    scheduling it this way.  Is John Zeigler secretly in charge here?
    
    Tom
3.719CAM::WAYGo Wahoos!Mon Oct 28 1991 12:5510
Night games on the weekend will assure MAXIMUM viewer audience.

You're not competing with college football, or pro-football as much
if it's at night.


I think that's why....


'Saw
3.720Domes Suck!BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 28 1991 12:571
    
3.721Nostalgia ain't what it usta beGEMVAX::HILLMon Oct 28 1991 13:3132
    re .719   
    
    Maybe so, but it's still better in the long run to have day games. I
    don't have kids, but I was thinking of about the time I first got
    interested in baseball. If at that time the games didn't start until 
    almost 9 and ended at midnight like this series, I would have missed 
    a lot. I woulda heard the national anthem, maybe the first inning but 
    that's about it. 
    
    I remember watching the Dodgers/Orioles WS with my father when I was 8,    
    and he was explaining all the points of the game to me, and why
    Drysdale pitching to Frank Robinson was one of the greatest
    pitcher/hitter confrontations of that generation of players. I wouldn't
    have been able to do the same with my kids today, which would be a
    shame, considering that almost every game went right down to the wire
    this year.
    
    I still think baseball and CBS are making a long-range mistake. True,
    there was probably a Cheryl Ladd (or other worshed-up ex-babe) movie 
    on NBC or some other washout, but a WS shouldn't be so 'feard a having 
    something else on at the same time. This isn't like some countries where 
    there's only 2 government owned channels, and the president's speech is 
    on both of them. Besides, if someone would rather watch college football 
    or (gasp!) a non-sports program on TV, that's their perogative. That's 
    why we have cable and VCRs, etc. 
    
    It is both naive and stupid of the networks to think they can get the
    same types of rating numbers/demogtaphics that they could even 10 years
    ago. There are far too many entertainment choices available, which is a 
    good thing.
    
    Tom
3.722CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 28 1991 14:055
3.723DOMES SUCK & SO DOES AstroTurf YEAH !!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Oct 28 1991 14:391
    
3.724class acts all the way aroundHAVASU::HEISERunborn women have rights tooMon Oct 28 1991 15:1810
    Re: Lonnie Smith
    
    When you have men on 2nd and 3rd with *NO OUTS* and can't even hit a
    sacrifice fly, you can hardly blame 1 player.
    
    Awesome game and a great series!  As many said, Braves have much to be
    proud of.  The Twins were very gracious toward their worthy opponents
    in the post-game festivities.
    
    Mike
3.725QUASER::HUNTERThe Donks Know OkoyeMon Oct 28 1991 17:145
    Glad to see it over.....  Now I can get some #^%*$& sleep
    
    Big Game
    
    P.s. hate to be Lonny Smith today !
3.726DECWET::METZGERGood pitching beats good hittingMon Oct 28 1991 17:4828
I was never a big anti or pro dh guy until this series....now I have to say I
am vehemently anti-dh. I think the 3 games in Atlanta showed that the NL 
managers have a much tougher job than the AL managers.

Watching last nights game I kept thinking to myself how much more exciting the
game could have been with the abscense of the DH. Do you lift Morris or SMoltz
in the 8th in a scoring situation? Who do you bring in in relief ? Do you risk
lifting Morris at all ?

Count me in as an anti-dh bigot.....


  Metz

BTW- Is Rick Aguilera vain or what? Anybody else catch him spending 5 minutes
      making sure his hair was perfect before he came in to game 6? I thought
      that was a riot?

     and isn't the runner rounding 2nd supposed to check his 3rd base coach 1st
     thing? How come none of the CBS braintrust mentioned that Smith never once
     looked at 3rd until he had seen the ball drop and was headed that way?

     CBS camera work was pretty abysmal..they continually kept missing live action
     because they were showing a replay for the 4th time.....


     Great series though......
3.727Aggie was hilarious... he knows big Game 6 pressureGUSHER::WAUGAMANMon Oct 28 1991 18:2624
             
>     and isn't the runner rounding 2nd supposed to check his 3rd base coach 1st
>     thing? How come none of the CBS braintrust mentioned that Smith never once
>     looked at 3rd until he had seen the ball drop and was headed that way?
      
    I thought they did mention it (in passing), but in any case usually
    the runner decides on his own whether to go when the ball's hit in 
    front of him where he can see it.  It's not the easiest maneuver
    in the world to be looking at the third base coach while you're
    trying to round second (slows you down), which is why the baserunner 
    normally goes with the coach's instructions only when the ball's 
    hit behind him to right field. 
    
    Perhaps you can criticize Smith for not looking for the ball soon
    enough (on a hit-and-run you're supposed to get your head up quickly),
    but I think, given that he did lose it, too much is being made of how
    Smith was tricked by the Twins' infielders and how he should have
    been using his coach, etc.  Those are possibilities, but Smith played 
    it safe and the decision to do so shouldn't have all of this negative
    "bonehaid"-type baggage attached to it.  It really shouldn't have
    mattered given the situation.  The Braves just didn't come through.
    
    glenn
    
3.728CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 28 1991 18:472
    If Hrbek "cheated" by sweeping a player's leg off a base with a tag,
    what is the decoy?  A fake take in softball is cause for ejection.
3.729Just waiting for that exact situationSHALOT::MEDVIDbe still be calm be quiet nowMon Oct 28 1991 18:588
>    If Hrbek "cheated" by sweeping a player's leg off a base with a tag,
>    what is the decoy?  
    
    Good coaching.  Tom Kelly might not have to think during the game being
    in the AL, but he certainly prepared his team for such situations ahead
    of time.
    
    	--dan'l
3.730HERIAM::CORBETTDo you think people will ever learn?Mon Oct 28 1991 19:317
>   The Twins were very gracious toward their worthy opponents
>   in the post-game festivities.
 

	of course they were that's the way it's supposed to be, unless of 
course your the Pistons....   
     
3.731a proud week and a half for the anti-DG crowdANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 29 1991 00:2542
    >Show me.
    
    Kidding, right?  But, on the off chance that you aren't: The pro-Geek
    crowd has for years used the argument that higher scoring games were
    more exciting.  This great Series rekindled the DG debate to its
    highest pitch in years.  Show ya?  Well, for one, Joe Garigiola was
    on network TV talking about how the NL was boring cuz it had too many
    low scoring games.
    
    re: Series
    
    By the numbers, the greatest Series ever.  Give credit to the umpiring
    crew for doing a great job, with only a few controversial calls (and
    most of them unique) and general satisfaction among both teams with the
    ball and strike calling.  The fans in both towns were great, with just
    the right touch of politics and good old time bad blood (the billboard,
    etc.).  There were two crowds of 100-150,000 people each after the
    game, one by the Dome, the other on the other end of downtown in the 
    warehouse district going crazy, with no violence and only a few of the
    usual DOC arrests. 
    
    The Braves have the best pitching staff in baseball.  And they're
    young.  The Twins won their 2nd Title in 5 years and are the only team
    to have done that in the past decade.  Tom Kelly has emerged as one of
    if not the top manager in the game.  Nobody finesses a flawed pitching
    staff like this guy.  He'd flourish in the NL.
    
    I thought the key to last night was Cox's decision to lift Smoltz.  We
    breathed a sigh of relief to see him go.  Not to say Cox is a bad
    skipper, cuz rating a manager one's gotta look at his success % on his
    moves.  Cox decided to go to the pen, TK was convinced by Morris to
    stay in for the tenth.  
    
    Deciding edge overall was the Twins' superior defense, although the 
    Braves D is good.  Game 6 was loaded with defensive gems by Leius,
    Gagne, Harper, and, most of all, Kirby skying up the plexiglass to save
    the day.
    
    Best Series ever, and the brie was great.  It was so good we decided to
    go for it and did up somTalbot (St. Julien) 83 !!
    
    MrT(wins WIN)
3.732Mr. "T"yuppieCUBIC7::DIGGINSThirst N'Howl Roolz!Tue Oct 29 1991 09:392
 Best Series ever, and the brie was great.  It was so good we decided to
    go for it and did up somTalbot (St. Julien) 83 !!
3.735Why can't they all be like that?CST17::FARLEYHave YOU seen Elvis Today?Tue Oct 29 1991 12:209
    Baseball ranks as one of my least favorite sports and I'd bet
    that during the last 10 years I have seen perhaps 6 total innings
    however, this series had me glued to the TV.  I LOVED it!!
    
    All I want to say is "Thank you" to both the Braves and the Twins
    for a very,very enjoyable World Series.
    
    Kev
    
3.736mais oui!ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 29 1991 12:5813
    >we'll break open the Cabernet Sauvignon '79...
    
    Whaddya mean *we*, Kemosabe?  It'll be a rainy day in hail when
    MrT allows his palette to be defiled with that sugary swill from
    California.  As I said, I had a big hunger for Title-meat.  And that
    hunger was sated.  The Twins (best team in baseball) served it up and 
    we got to dine so fine.  Course, Title-meat is red meat, and given how
    special the occassion was, we popped open several liters a Chateau
    Talbot '83 (St. Julien).  A big, hearty, fine bordeaux wine a the
    most haut breeding.  Yummy !!
    
    MrT
           
3.737SOLANA::MAY_BRNeed one of those endolphin rushesTue Oct 29 1991 13:253
    I guess anyyone who thought Kelly would do a fine job in the NL after
    watching game 3 wouldn't know anything about wine, either.  Tony
    LaRussa wouldn't have let that series get back to Minny.
3.738CAM::WAYMUNG, the #1 WORST TreatTue Oct 29 1991 13:4913
Wine.  Hmmmph!!!


Nancies drink wine.  Real men exist for Beer/Ale/Stout and/or Whiskey.

If you wanna dance around in a field of pansies wearing a tutu, drink
some wine.

Otherwise, belly up to the bar, and order three-fingers of your favorite
whisky....straightup.


'Saw
3.739That's what *I* thought tooGEMVAX::HILLTue Oct 29 1991 13:5219
    re .734
     
    Let's step into the Wayback Machine and set the time for this date in
    the year A.D. 1986. Change a word here and there, and see what we have:   
                                                                
    "I'm sure Bostonians are bumming over this loss but their Red Sox gave
    them quite a few thrills this year including a hell of a Series. And
    with their great, young pitching staff they've got alot to look for-
    ward to which is more than us [any other team] fans can say."

    As terrible as this was, I thought that there would be many more years
    with that generation of players, especially the pitching staff of Clemens, 
    Hurst, and a physically and emotioanlly healthy Boyd. For the Braves
    sake, let's hope they aren't as stooopid as Sox management in not
    caring enough to keep guys like Hurst and later, Boddicker, letting
    the team fall by the wayside. Then again, maybe the Braves WOULD trade 
    half their pitching staff for Greenwell and Brunansky, right Lou?
      
    Tom
3.740ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Oct 29 1991 14:0722
    Game 3 was a fine managing job by TK.  Perhaps cuz you are a ALmost
    fan and aren't aware of the subtleties involved in real baseball
    games.  TK made only one mistake in the entire move-filled game,
    and that was substituting in Al Newman.  TK admitted that this move
    was a big risk that didn't work out, but did it on instinct cuz he
    felt Newman's contact hitting would move the run across the plate.
    
    The remainder of his moves were calculatedly aggresive.  Each time
    the Twins had a shot to go ahaid he loaded up and went for it, fully
    aware that if the move didn't pay off he would be in a weakened 
    position next time around.  Sometimes this approach (which is used
    often by NL managers depending on the opponent and situation) works
    and sometimes it doesn't.  But it's never uninformed unintelligent
    dumbkopf blunders of the type seen from LaRussa and Pinella last 
    year, which embarrassed baseball fans (i.e., NL fans) the world
    over.  But, who knows?, maybe the school systems in Tampa just aren't
    any good.
    
    Cabernet Sauvignon is rotgut swill.  Chateau Talbot is nectar from
    the elysian fields hard by le Gironde.
    
    MrT(wins WIN !!)
3.741AXIS::ROBICHAUDSmith &gt; KnightTue Oct 29 1991 14:164
    	Congrats to the Twins and Mort!  Spam and Ripple for all those
    longtime fans!
    
    				/Don
3.742GUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Oct 29 1991 15:3324
    
>    Game 3 was a fine managing job by TK.  Perhaps cuz you are a ALmost
>    fan and aren't aware of the subtleties involved in real baseball
>    games.  TK made only one mistake in the entire move-filled game,
>    and that was substituting in Al Newman.  TK admitted that this move
>    was a big risk that didn't work out, but did it on instinct cuz he
>    felt Newman's contact hitting would move the run across the plate.
     
    Gotta admit that the more I think about it, the more I feel that
    if anyone didn't manage the way an NL manager is "supposed to"
    it was Bobby Cox.  With runs very hard to come by all series long,
    he apparently lacked the guts to run roughshod all over that rag-arm
    Brian Harper when he was in there the last two games, on turf where 
    that kind of game is most effective.  Sure, Harper did throw out 
    Mitchell in the 11th inning of Game 6, but even then it was because 
    Mitchell got a poor jump and still was only tagged on the rear end 
    as he went sliding by.  They hit-and-ran a lot (to bad result), but 
    the hit-and-run play did not take advantage of the Twins' primary 
    weakness, at catcher.  Jack Morris isn't the best at holding runners
    on, either, which would have been his only weakness to exploit on
    that particular night...
    
    glenn
     
3.743ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureMon Nov 04 1991 20:3312
    Know what the most thigh-suuddering aspeck a my World Series 
    Victory was?
    
    Noooo, not that my perenniel man-sized hunger for Title-meat 
    which was sated yet again (thank you).  What *I* luved was that
    after having been raked over the coals for three months by the
    Pittsburgh crowd about what a bunch a front-runners we Mpls folk
    are and then...
    
    25,000 empty game 7 seats!  HAAAA.
    
    MrT
3.744CELTIK::JACOBMon Nov 04 1991 22:0416
    "T"
    
    Are you related to (or maybe are you) Hal????
    
    re
    >>25,000 empty game 7 seats!  HAAAA.
    
    The figure was more like 12,000.
    
    Read the atricle by Gene Collier on the game that I entered in here
    somewhere.
    
    GAL
    
    JaKe
    
3.745ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Nov 05 1991 12:158
    Gee, FaKe, you're quite persuasive... *only* 12,000 empty game 7
    seats?!  Hmmmm, I see what you're getting at.  Only problem though,
    is that you spent the past year blabbing about some ticket mix-up
    and that proved to be so much verbal dung-style obfuscation so we'll
    just take your credibility into account and assume that the national
    writers who said 25,000 are correct.
    
    MrT
3.746But it appears T is wrong >again>CSCOA1::ROLLINS_RTue Nov 05 1991 13:306
	Those "national" writers reporting in St.Paul/Minneapolis
	must have different sources from the "national" writers reporting
	here in Atlanta, T, because I've seen the approx.12,000 figure
	reported down here, as well.

	Of course, that's still a lot of tickets unsold ...
3.747Okay, T, what's your game this time?GUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Nov 05 1991 13:3914
    
>    	Those "national" writers reporting in St.Paul/Minneapolis
>	must have different sources from the "national" writers reporting
>	here in Atlanta, T, because I've seen the approx.12,000 figure
>	reported down here, as well.
 
    Not to mention that street mob-style estimates are unnecessary, because
    attendance figures in the NL count *actual* attendees, and the number
    released was some 47,000-odd fans.  Once again, MrT's dancing
    to the tune of a different drummer, and nobody knows what the hail
    he's talking about, which is, of course, his intent.
    
    glenn
    
3.748SublimeANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Nov 05 1991 14:5516
    I'm dancing to the tune of a empty-seat-number I read in the local
    newspaper three times by three separate writers.  Dunno what Three
    Rivers baseball capacity is, but if the 47,000 number is truthful
    (and the veracity of the Pirates mgt. is suspect nowadays) then the,
    er, "heart void" should be easy enough to calculate.
    
    Whatever the case, MrT is not "wrong again."  What's wrong is FaKe,
    after having spent months in collusion with certain other Pittsburgh
    types a dragging poor MrT over the coals about how much better fans
    in the Steal City were than in the Twin Cities... is now in the
    position a arguing that "only" 12,000 seats were empty for the NLCS
    game 7.
    
    Now *that's* wrong!
    
    MrT 
3.749CAM::WAYIf it's no' Scottish it's CRAP!Tue Nov 05 1991 15:215
At this late date, weeks after the incident, who really cares about 
how many empty seats there were in Pittsburgh?

Personally, I'm coming to grips with Geraldo popping a popper under
Bette's nose before grappling her massive hooters.....
3.750Game 7 NLCSCSC32::J_HERNANDEZZrock:FlipUsOn, FlipThemOffTue Nov 05 1991 16:043
    I dunno how many empty seats were there, I do however remember a loud
    tomahawk chant going on. Did the good people off Pittsburg jump on the
    Braves' bandwagon or did the Braves' fans just out cheer them?
3.751"Read in a newspaper I have right here in my 'corporate box'"GUSHER::WAUGAMANTue Nov 05 1991 16:0810
    
    > I'm dancing to the tune of a empty-seat-number I read in the local
    > newspaper three times by three separate writers.
      
    Were these local "national" writers or national "local" writers?
    Gotta know where to put those all-important quotation marks when
    dealing with MrT's "interpretations"...
    
    glenn
    
3.752ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureTue Nov 05 1991 17:3516
    Local writers.  Didn't read it in Box 117.  Read it over my morning
    java.  Btw, I have my stub that sez "Suite $60" right there on it 
    in plain English.
    
    The local papers had writers at 3 Rivers to cover the NLCS in
    anticipation of the World Series.  Their accounts of the vast expanses
    of empty seats weren't of the false bravado cover-up variety seen with
    Pittsburghians during last years Stanley Cup.  They just couldn't
    believe what they were seeing.  Probably they've been spoiled by the
    super fans up here in this total sports community.  
    
    But kudos to these writers, cuz they didn't pull any of the type of
    badmouthing crap as seen in here (and the media) last spring, from
    a variety of subjective persona... including YOU Glenn.
    
    MrT(he Stadium's FULL, SOLD OUT, SRO !!)
3.753CELTIK::JACOBChicago says, Vote Early &amp; OftenTue Nov 05 1991 20:1723
    
    >>Local writers.  Didn't read it in Box 117.  Read it over my morning
      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
    >>The local papers had writers at 3 Rivers to cover the NLCS in
    >>anticipation of the World Series.  Their accounts of the vast expanses
    
    I see, it was writers for your local rags up there in Minny-soda.
    
    Only goes to show that there is prufe that ALL Minny-Sodaians suffer
    from EXTREME EXAGERATION of everything they talk or write about.
    
    Finally proved it for all of us in here.  We've thought that for ages.
    
    JaKe
    
    BTW, It bugged me that there were so many empty seats, but I cain't dew
    anything about it, so BFD.  I were 1500 miles away from here for the
    lasted couple a weeks of the season and thruout the playoffs or I
    woulda taken a night off and went to the Stadium.  Other than that,
    "T", it's over, done, behind us, so put it to rest braggadocio.
    
    
3.754ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureWed Nov 06 1991 12:5413
    >but I cain't dew anything about it, so BFD... Other than that, "T",
    >it's over.
    
    In your dreams maybe.  I was raked over the coals for months by you
    self-praising Pittsburhians (most of whom for some reason no longer 
    live there) and 12-25,000 EMPTY SEATS AT AN NLCS GAME SEVEN IS THE
    WORST EXAMPLE OF FAN SUPPORT IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF MAJOR SPORTS AND
    SURELY THE LOWEST CLASS EXHIBITION OF SAME IN THE HISTORY OF BASEBALL
    AND WHAT YOU CAIN "dew" ABOUT IT IS ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG LAST YEAR AND
    EAT CROW FOR THE RaKeING YOU AND YOUR BROS DID TO ME LAST SPRING !!
    
    MrT
    
3.755What the hail are you talking about?GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Nov 06 1991 13:1028
    
>        In your dreams maybe.  I was raked over the coals for months by you
>    self-praising Pittsburhians (most of whom for some reason no longer 
>    live there) and 12-25,000 EMPTY SEATS AT AN NLCS GAME SEVEN IS THE
>    WORST EXAMPLE OF FAN SUPPORT IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF MAJOR SPORTS AND
>    SURELY THE LOWEST CLASS EXHIBITION OF SAME IN THE HISTORY OF BASEBALL
>    AND WHAT YOU CAIN "dew" ABOUT IT IS ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG LAST YEAR AND
>    EAT CROW FOR THE RaKeING YOU AND YOUR BROS DID TO ME LAST SPRING !!
 
    Horsepoop.  You, as both a self-proclaimed sports purist and analyst,
    were raked over the coals for your craven sell-out to the NHL's
    bogus playoff system in the face of all your past denunciations, a 
    system which allowed a pitiful regular-season performer like the 
    North Stars to advance to the championship finals.  Instead of 
    sticking to past principles, you whole-heartedly and shamelessly 
    hurtled yourself onto the bandwagon (which was the offense levied at 
    you and the Minnesota fans, NOT lack of support once the going got 
    good).  You, sir, were a frontrunner then and are an obfuscator
    now.  I suggest you come clean with an explanation before we're
    all forced to write you off as a nonsensical blowhard smitten with 
    flailing away at strawmen, armed with invented facts and figures.
    
    A once-great force of reason has managed in the short period of one
    calendar year to align himself with the ranks of the criminally
    insane!
    
    glenn
    
3.756No inevitable decline seen here <yet> ...CSCOAC::ROLLINS_RWed Nov 06 1991 13:3017
>    A once-great force of reason has managed in the short period of one
>    calendar year to align himself with the ranks of the criminally
>    insane!
    
     Just to defend T from the accusations that he is in a period of
     inevitable decline, I hereby challenge Glenn to name even one moment
     when T was a great force of reason.
    
     No, my friend, T has never been to such heights.  He remains at the
     same level he always has been (perhaps has risen a notch).  Nor can
     he be categorized with the criminally insane.  His shenanigans are
     those of the misunderstood and of our neighborhood college pranksters.

     While I wouldn't classify T's responses as trustworthy (whatever his
     motivations are, surely his credibility is completely shot), his sanity
     and reason have not deteriorated one bit from the level they have always
     attained.
3.758ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureWed Nov 06 1991 18:5639
    What's going on here?
    
    Waugamain, after wading through your diatribe I could only wince
    at the dangerous irony of your having used the word "blowhard" at
    all.  No, no hypocrisy or sell-outs attended my fine boosterism of
    the North Stars and Twins.  I'm lucky enough as a human bean to be
    here in the City of Championships and able to observe these ultimate
    proceedings from center ice seats and first base luxury suits.
    
    I think you're jealous buddy.  I threw down the gauntlet and 
    challenged you to prove a link between my theoretical purity as per
    the Designated Geek, Turf, Domes, and nonselective playoffs and you
    skulked away, not only mute, but probably moot to boot.
    
    Nay, I'm clean.  I aim still the Beacon of Reason in here, and my
    light burns bright with the passion of Right.  
    
    Also, you evade the Truth in a most bogus manner when you claim that
    the mugging I took in the hockey notes had only to do with my alleged
    hypocrisy and didn't involve massive dosages of Minnesota fan-bashing,
    which of course it did.
    
    Let's settle without compromising ourselves.  The fig leaf I extend is
    taht you Pittsburghians (who for some reason almost all now reside
    elsewhere) humiliated yourselfs in this file and in the national media
    with all that self-praising chest-strutting and belittling of the fine
    fans in a total sports town that the Twin Cities are and then only 
    months later were horrified to see the lie put to that Nixonesque
    ticket mix-up excuse and worse 12-25,000 empty NLCS game7 seats and all
    that that meant. 
    
    You guys were mean, and you got burned.  Pittsburgh is an embarrassment
    to all of sport and to baseball in particular.  Baseball should move
    out of the Steal City now cuz the fans don't measure up to fans such as
    those found in the Twin Cities.  
    
    And Pittsburgh was an embarrassment to you, too.
    
    MrT
3.759I bow once again to the master ...SHALOT::HUNTI Survived Megastorm '91Wed Nov 06 1991 19:028
 Nobody keeps a rathole more alive more often than MrT ...
 
 Now he has the Pittsburgh crew actually defending their 12,000 empty
 NLCS Game 7 seats.  
 
 Sheer brilliance.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.760SublimeANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureWed Nov 06 1991 19:1514
    Why, thank you Bob.
    
    The highest-frequency thigh-shuddering paroxyms are actually being
    caused not by their hilarious defense of a half-empty NLCS game7,
    but rather by the fack that the Pittsburgh crowd contains gentlemen
    who once stood at the pinnacle of scientific-objectivism in sports
    noting: Waugamain, Medvid, Partee, et al (disincluding FaKe, to be
    sure).  
    
    Now, they're twisting facts and shouting tirades in their udderly
    fantastic embarrassment with not only with Pittsburgh but with 
    themselves.
    
    MrT
3.761Awaiting explanation for former distaste for local teamsGUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Nov 06 1991 19:2943
                              
>    I think you're jealous buddy.  I threw down the gauntlet and 
>    challenged you to prove a link between my theoretical purity as per
>    the Designated Geek, Turf, Domes, and nonselective playoffs and you
>    skulked away, not only mute, but probably moot to boot.
 
    Gee, T, you forgot about the relentless abuse you've heaped on the 
    "Twinks" and "No Stars" (*your* nicknames, not mine) for years.  You 
    forgot about your advocacy of a move of the Twins' franchise to Denver 
    and an outright dissolution of the North Stars' organization.  
    Combined with all the other distasteful elements listed above that 
    you've also complained about over the years but suddenly found the 
    strength to stomach come championship time, yes, I'd say your "purity" 
    is severely tainted!  And who skulked away with a response of "I 
    haven't been accused of anything" when I addressed these 
    inconsistencies the first time around?
       
    Does the following look like a defense of the non-sellout?  I've
    been the first to admit that baseball rates a distant third in
    Pittsburgh behind football and hockey.  No MrT-like hypocrisy from
    me...
    
    glenn
    
>    Lastly, there's no excuse for how far short Game 7 was from a sellout.
>    History doesn't mean a thing if there aren't many natives left who 
>    truly appreciate it.  Pittburghers sensing the "choke" doesn't cut it
>    as an answer, either (how many of those folks would have been right 
>    back on the bandwagon for the World Series?).  I had three members of 
>    my immediate family, still die-hard Pirates fans all (I gave up such 
>    rigid allegiance to my team of birthright long ago), at this series-- 
>    who came in from Cincinnati, DC, and San Francisco to do so (these
>    people aren't rich either, but they do understand that the opportunity
>    to see the Pirates in the postseason, much less a Game 7, is a rare
>    one).  It is a shame that a Game 7 to the most exciting series in years
>    wasn't able to attract even 50,000 fans, even if just as fans of great 
>    baseball.  If the Pirates ever do move from Pittsburgh, which really 
>    would be a great tragedy, the fans who couldn't even make it out to a 
>    Game 7 at the home park of the team with the best record in baseball 
>    would only have themselves to blame.  You can't keep pointing fingers at
>    management, not when the product has been as good as the Pirates the
>    past few years...
    
3.762Been thereSHALOT::HUNTI Survived Megastorm '91Wed Nov 06 1991 19:3126
 Actually, I've been in that position before under slightly different
 circumstances ... namely, the Sixers poor attendance numbers when they go
 up against their next door neighbors, the Phillies.
 
 True story ... back in the early 1980's when the Sixers were in the NBA
 power troika with the Lakers and the Celtics, they actually drew something
 like 5,000 fans to a Sunday afternoon Game 7 finale against the Bucks.  
 Meanwhile, across the street, the Phils played the Cubs in front of
 40,000.   
 
 When you boil down *ALL* the reasons, excuses, rhetoric, and issues, you
 really only come up with two possible explanations ... either the Bucs'
 fans didn't care or the ticket prices were too high.
 
 It is a knock, however hard it hurts, on the Pittsburgh Pirates fans if
 they didn't care enough to attend Game 7.   For some strange reason that I
 can't figure out, the Pirates just don't seem to inspire a truly rabid fan
 following.   It gets even stranger when you think of the success they've
 had over the past 20 or so years (especially the early 1970's) and some of
 the supreme talents they've had to root for ... Clemente, Stargell,
 Parker, Bonds, ...
 
 Philly is a baseball, hockey and college basketball town.  Pittsburgh is a
 football town.   Been that way for a long time, too.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.763HAVASU::HEISERunborn women have rights tooWed Nov 06 1991 20:1211
    Pittsburgh fans, why even bother acknowledging this lone clanging
    cymbal of hypocrisy?  The Pirates have a better legacy than most of the
    league.  The excuse of "starvation for title meat" doesn't justify the 
    hypocrisy behind supporting a plastic team.
    
    The bait-switch-play_by_my_rules routine is the norm for people
    that lack honesty and subject knowledge.  I thought all SPORTSters that 
    embraced their fantasy-like view of the world as reality had already
    left DEC.
    
    Mike
3.764JUPITR::PARTEECharlie -- Lemieux est le mieuxWed Nov 06 1991 20:2632
>    caused not by their hilarious defense of a half-empty NLCS game7,
>    but rather by the fack that the Pittsburgh crowd contains gentlemen
>    who once stood at the pinnacle of scientific-objectivism in sports
>    noting: Waugamain, Medvid, Partee, et al (disincluding FaKe, to be

    Not me, main.  I dint never say nothing about the game 7 attendance.
    In the paradigm of fandom, it was indefensible and I haven't defended it.
  
>    Let's settle without compromising ourselves.  The fig leaf I extend is
>    taht you Pittsburghians (who for some reason almost all now reside
>    elsewhere) humiliated yourselfs in this file and in the national media

    T, a main who possesses the fine grasp of dastistics that you daily 
    display surely sees that you are conversing with a non-representative 
    sample (Pittsburghers at DEC) of the true Pittsburgh denizens.  A
    fine upright manly sample we are, to be sure, but we are not a random
    sample.  Except for JaKe, those who stayed in the 'burgh ain't in the 
    notesfiles.  And they ain't talking to you.  I know plenty of people 
    who would only accept jobs in the Steel City.  This implied slur isn't 
    worthy of your high standards, T (snicker).

>    the North Stars and Twins.  I'm lucky enough as a human bean to be
>    here in the City of Championships and able to observe these ultimate

   No way, no how, T(hief).  You can't usurp this title from the rightful
   owners.  The Twins spam-balled (TM) their way into two championships...and
   that's it.  No Lombardi trophies, no Stanley Cups (heh heh...).  The
   City of Bridesmaids kin be proud of their respectable teams, but they
   cain't be proud of their CHAMPEENSHIP teamS!
    
    Charlie
    
3.765Thanks T !LUNER::BROOKSX-Men rooooole !Thu Nov 07 1991 00:139
    re .758
    
    > I'm lucky enough as a human bean .....
                       
    Well T, you have at last described yourself somewhat accurately.
    
    You ARE full of it (gas and other byproducts) !!!!
    
    Dr Midnight
3.766CELTIK::JACOBThu Nov 07 1991 02:1418
    re.765
    
    For once Midracingstripeintheshorts, you've said something worthwhile.
    
    Re somewhere back there, I have never DEFENDED 12,000 empty seats. 
    back in my notes I said I don't understand it, I entered Gen Collier's
    column on the empty seats, but I never downright defended the empty
    seats, cause I would have given up my hard earned cahs money to be in
    one of them if'n I had been in town at the time.
    
    Other than that, I rest on the subject.  I refuse to go on with "T" and
    have to read his diatribes on why Pittsburgh this and Pittsburgh that
    when the guy ain't never probably been here more than a flight change
    in the airport.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.767ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureThu Nov 07 1991 11:2738
    Waugamain, you disappoint even in your (weak-tit) obfuscati here.
    
    Yeah, after chest-strutting and Twin Cities-bashing last spring you
    guys logged in to do some circumspect spin control on those tens of
    thousands of empty NLCS game7 seats (certainly the most vividly
    shocking example of poor fandom in the history of sport and the
    greatest embarrassment to MLB)... but what you DIDN'T do is:
    
    - Apologize and admit that you were wrong in your claims that
      Pittsburghians were superfans and Minnesotans were brie-eating
      front-runners (note: yes, we eat brie, in fact I had some only
      last night at my dinner table, but we're not front-runners).
    
    - Give up on the canard that my past criticisms of the NoStars
      and Twinkies (affectionate monikers, btw) in connection with my
      fine boosterism somehow constitutes hypocrisy.  How so?  I called
      for the Twins to move to Denver so baseball could be played under
      the sun in the wind on natural grass.  Steal feel that way.  No
      contradiction with my boosterism there!  Ditto for the NoStars, but
      in a even clearer way.  My comments per the NoStars related to the
      infamous Gund brothers, whose high jinks caused thousands of hard
      core hockey fans to stay home in protest.  When Green bought the
      squad the enthusiasm slowly built back up.  No contradiction there
      neither!
    
      As for the non-selectivity, so what.  They were in the Cup Finals,
      and that was what I was dealing with.  Never said that non-selectivity
      was good.  Ftm, never endorsed Turf or Domes, neither.
    
    Here's the crux: You guys endorsed Pittsburgh fans (feigns?) by way of
    bashing Minnesota fans.  Then, tens of thousands of empty seats for a
    NLCS game7.  The worst example of fan support in the history of sport,
    period, and none of you have had the intellectual courage to come to 
    grips with this horrific FACT.
    
    Thank you,
    
    MrT
3.768Prove it or lose it...GUSHER::WAUGAMANThu Nov 07 1991 12:1651
    > empty NLCS game7 seats (certainly the most vividly
    > shocking example of poor fandom in the history of sport and the
    > greatest embarrassment to MLB)...
    
    Prove it.  I've offered no apologies for the empty seats, but it
    should be noted that Pittsburgh sold out the other three playoff
    games (admittedly minus a couple thousand of the worst seats in
    one of the worst baseball stadiums in the country) and, perhaps
    in their overconfidence, had completely sold out their tickets to 
    all of the World Series games.
        
    Let me give you a hint: there have been smaller crowds, with more
    empty seats, in playoff and World Series play, much less in the
    "history of sport".  You're all wet here.  You have a point, but
    once again it's lost in the hyperbole.
    
>        - Apologize and admit that you were wrong in your claims that
>      Pittsburghians were superfans and Minnesotans were brie-eating
>      front-runners (note: yes, we eat brie, in fact I had some only
>      last night at my dinner table, but we're not front-runners).
 
    No apology necessary.  I never claimed Pittsburghers to be "superfans",
    and the lackluster attendance of Minnesota baseball fans even during 
    periods of relative success speaks for itself.  I'll cut you a break
    on the hockey thing, as the crooked Gund brothers certainly had
    a major affect there.  To be honest, the bashing I did of North Stars' 
    fans was completely in fun, as I don't give a rat's butt about them
    or the Penguins.  But you have managed to take that good-natured
    jousting and go off the deep end with it, babbling incoherently
    all the way down on your descent...
    
>        - Give up on the canard that my past criticisms of the NoStars
>      and Twinkies (affectionate monikers, btw) in connection with my
>      fine boosterism somehow constitutes hypocrisy.  How so?  I called
>      for the Twins to move to Denver so baseball could be played under
>      the sun in the wind on natural grass.  Steal feel that way.  No
 
    Right.  A Minnesota resident and a supposed title-meat-hungry Twins' 
    fan feels that it would be better if the Twins moved away to Denver 
    (no more Series' games in the "corporate box"! Sniff...)  Now that's
    a *real* fan!  Gee, why not to Florida, MrT?     
    
>    The worst example of fan support in the history of sport,
>    period, and none of you have had the intellectual courage to come to 
>    grips with this horrific FACT.
                 
    Again, prove it, 'cause you know damn well I can disprove it.
    
    glenn
    
3.769RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOKeep Religion Out of Politics!!Thu Nov 07 1991 12:5617
    re .63
    
    Second paragraph - so can one infer that means folks like JoJ, Dan,
    Mike JN, Hoot, Monty West, etc???
    
    Other than John Hendry, I can't think of a noter who hasn't engaged in
    some sort of hypocrisy in here.  Myself included - and you included.
    
    As for the Pirates legacy - it is no secret that Pittsburg is a
    football town.  Personally, I found it pretty crappy that Game 7 wasn't
    sold out.  It was as if the faux fans simply jumped off the bandwagon
    and scrambled back to watch the Pens after the loss in Game 6.  
    
    As for baiting - yep MrT does it pretty well - but so do lots of folks
    - myself and you included also.  
    
    JD
3.770CAM::WAYIf it's no' Scottish it's CRAP!Thu Nov 07 1991 12:599
>    
>    Other than John Hendry, I can't think of a noter who hasn't engaged in
>    some sort of hypocrisy in here.  Myself included - and you included.


Ok, JD, trash my feelings 8^(, see if *I* care (sniff, sniff)....


'Saw
3.771HAVASU::HEISERunborn women have rights tooThu Nov 07 1991 13:4213
    I guess Glen wins that debate.  T cain't prove or document anything. 
    Afterall, he's too busy!
    
    While we're proving things...
    
>    Other than John Hendry, I can't think of a noter who hasn't engaged in
>    some sort of hypocrisy in here.  Myself included - and you included.
    
    I don't think so JD.  There are a lot of people in here, including you
    and I, that stick to our beliefs and support our teams no matter what.
    Don't sell yourself short...
    
    Mike
3.772RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOKeep Religion Out of Politics!!Thu Nov 07 1991 13:468
    Mike -
    
    I'm not selling myself short - but, at times, I think we are all a
    little guilty of hypocrisy - partly because in supporting
    teams/players, etc that we like, we may hypocritically trash another
    team/player.  Not saying we are guilty all the time!
    
    JD
3.773AXIS::ROBICHAUDTheNewM&amp;MDuo-Messier%MadonnaThu Nov 07 1991 14:034
    	Maybe the math types out there can figure out a hypocrisy quotient
    that we can apply and determine who the biggest hippycrit is.
    
    				/Don
3.774CNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Nov 07 1991 14:1313
3.775CAM::WAYIf it's no' Scottish it's CRAP!Thu Nov 07 1991 15:445
>
>    	Maybe the math types out there can figure out a hypocrisy quotient
>    that we can apply and determine who the biggest hippycrit is.
    
The SPORTS Hypocritical Affect.  A stat for Dan if there ever was one...8^)
3.776And the same was true at the Met...GUSHER::WAUGAMANThu Nov 07 1991 17:0318
    
   > How was the Twins' regular season attendance?  Was it better
   > than Pittsburgh's?
    
    The Twins' was better by a couple hundred thousand out of some 2.2+ 
    million.  'Course, last year the Twins were 20th in a 26-horse race 
    (probably even worse if not for the AL method of counting), but T's 
    already poor-mouthed that away with his last-place team excuse, even 
    though he knows darn well that the team wasn't that bad (divisional 
    imbalance) and still represented a quality product in a clean,
    family-oriented environment.
    
    Fact is, the history of support for baseball in both these cities
    is spotty at best...
    
    glenn
    
    
3.777Waugamain, SPORTS' debutant HypocriteANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureThu Nov 07 1991 17:1141
    Ah, the sublimity a it all....  Yeah, Waugamain, you got me there,
    indeed the Pittsburghians deed manage to sell out the first 3 games
    of the NLCS.
    
    JD, you resemble a ally like Tom Foley resembles a opposition leader:
    Like a boat anchor!  Let me summarize it myself:
    
    1)  I hate the Dome and the Geek.
    
    2)  I'd like to see the Twins moved to Denver, cuz then they'd be
        playing under the sun on the grass.
    
    3)  I rooted for the Twins in the World Series.  Admittedly, this was
        made easier by the fact that they're the most soulful, gutsy, well-
        coached squad in the game.
    
    1-3 yields 0.0 micrograms of the dreaded toxic Hy-2 compound, known to
    cause disorientation, nausea, and hallucinations in humans.  
    
    and...
    
    1)  I hate nonselective playoff formats.
    
    2)  Like others I hated the Gund brothers for blackmailing taxpayers for
        a hundred million dollars and getting rid of their best players to
        drive down fan support and attendance so as to force Ziegler to
        allow them to move the North Stars.
    
    3)  I rooted for the North Stars in the Stanley Cup.   Admittedly, this
        was made easier by the fact that they play on the best ice in the
        NHL.
    
    1-3 yields 0.0% micrograms of the dreaded toxic Hy-2 compound, known to
    cause disorientation, nausea, and hallucinations in humans.
    
    Additionally, the Twins finished in last place last year and their
    attendance was as I remember over a 1 1/2 million.  If you wanna bash
    front-runner feigns I refer you to Atlanta, where a bad year'll get ya
    900K in a season.
    
    MrT
3.778LAGUNA::MAY_BRNeed one of those endolphin rushesThu Nov 07 1991 18:409
    
    
    My favorite part of the Pittsburg article is where the writer divides
    the number of empty seats at game 7 by the total number of seats
    available during the entire year.  I couldn't figure out what the hell
    that was supposed to prove, as it means absolutely nothing, or why he
    would even think it up.
    
    Bruce              
3.779"Analyst" fails to deliver...GUSHER::WAUGAMANThu Nov 07 1991 19:1217
    
>    Ah, the sublimity a it all....  Yeah, Waugamain, you got me there,
>    indeed the Pittsburghians deed manage to sell out the first 3 games
>    of the NLCS.
                                                               
    Well, add a charge of Willful Misrepresentation to the existing charges
    of Hypocrisy and Obfuscation (and to think for all those years *you*
    chastised Dan for such behavior!).  The comment I made came not as a
    defense of the Game 7 non-sellout, which was inexcusable, but in direct
    response to your "worst MLB embarrassment ever" line a bull, which, as
    Mr. Heiser predicted, you'd drop when confronted with a demand for
    supporting evidence.  Mysteriously, the demand was completely ignored
    in favor of more intellectually dishonest, inflammatory material such
    as the above.  Failure to accede to request duly noted... 
    
    glenn
    
3.780CELTIK::JACOBThu Nov 07 1991 22:5214
    
    >>My favorite part of the Pittsburg article is where the writer divides
    >>the number of empty seats at game 7 by the total number of seats
    >>available during the entire year.  I couldn't figure out what the hell
    >>that was supposed to prove, as it means absolutely nothing, or why he
    >>would even think it up.
    
    Bruce, it wasn't the seats available for the whole year, it was the
    seats available for the 4 playoff games and 3 world series games.
    total ~420,000 of which all but 12,000-15,000 were sold.  And most of
    those were for the game 7 abomination.
    
    JaKe
    
3.781Ban DG, Turf, Domes; Move Twins to Denver YEAHANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureFri Nov 08 1991 11:2215
    YOU are the one chest-strutting about allegedly having facks even
    more mortifying than Pittsburgh's squalid embarrassment in your
    possession, Waugamain.  Thus YOU are the one who is backing down 
    from the challenge.  I don't blame ya, after defending tens a thousands 
    a empty NLCS game7 seats, you've already hoed a tough row, and laying
    down the tool is certainly understandable at this point.
    
    re: FaKe
    
    Hmmmm, so now it's up to 15,000 empty seats according to those frauds
    in the Pittsburgh Pirates organization.  So long as you're coming
    clean, RaKe, any admissions outta them on how their ticket x-up cover
    story was faked?
    
    MrT(wins WIN yeah !!)
3.782Better crank up the excuse machine, MrT...GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Nov 08 1991 12:4163
    
>    YOU are the one chest-strutting about allegedly having facks even
>    more mortifying than Pittsburgh's squalid embarrassment in your
>    possession, Waugamain.  Thus YOU are the one who is backing down 
>    from the challenge.  I don't blame ya, after defending tens a thousands 
>    a empty NLCS game7 seats, you've already hoed a tough row, and laying
>    down the tool is certainly understandable at this point.
     
    *You* made the assertion that Pittsburgh's Game 7 no-show was the 
    greatest embarrassment in the history of sports, and I asked that you
    back it up.  I also warned you that if you didn't accept my challenge
    to play tough, clean hardball, that *I* would and the result would
    come at your expense.  Well, you asked for it, pal:
    
    	Ten smallest crowds in post-League Championship history:

        1.  Oakland, Game 5, 1973 ALCS		24,265
        2.  MINNESOTA, Game 1, 1970 ALCS	26,847
        3.  MINNESOTA, Game 2, 1970 ALCS	27,490
        4.  Oakland, Game 4, 1973 ALCS		27,497
        5.  Baltimore, Game 3, 1970 ALCS	27,608
        6.  Baltimore, Game 4, 1974 ALCS	28,136
        7.  Oakland, Game 1, 1972 ALCS		29,536
        8.  Oakland, Game 2, 1972 ALCS		31,088
        9.  Baltimore, Game 3, 1974 ALCS	32,060
       10.  MINNESOTA, Game 3, 1969 ALCS	32,735
    
    Minnesota, two of the three (and three of the ten) smallest crowds
    in divisional postseason history!  Pittsburgh, despite playing over
    twice as many playoff games as Minnesota and in *five* series in
    the years 1970-75 (where attendance was down across the board),
    nowhere to be found on the list!
    
    Now we know where those Minnesota writers got their 25,000 empty-
    seat figure.  The poor creatures were having delusional flashbacks,
    no doubt based in a deep-seated Twin Cities inferiority complex,
    to the sordid days of Minnesota Twins playoff games played before
    half-empty Metropolitan Stadium crowds!
    
    Looking for MLB "embarrassments" from more recent history?  How
    about 36,491 (20,000+ empty) in Montreal, for the classic 1981 NLCS 
    Game 5 finale with Los Angeles?  How about 32,084 (12,000 empty)
    in Toronto, 1985 ALCS Game 7?  
    
    And, lastly, in what is maybe the biggest blemish in MLB postseason
    history, how about the measly 44,672 (12,000 empty) in New York for the
    Mets' playoff opener, 1988 Game 3 against Los Angeles?  Geez, you'd
    think a big city like New York would be able to sell out a playoff game
    before you'd pick on little ol' Pittsburgh, wouldn't you?  Or maybe it
    was just the ticket distribution policy that caused New York to leave
    such a stain on our great game?  Got a coverup story for us yet, T? 
    
    But, hey, MrT, I'm not one to hold a grudge.  Whatta ya say I extend
    you one of them "fig leafs" and we hear no more about Minnesota's
    tawdry bottom 10 all-time attendance rankings or the consternation 
    New York Met fans caused all a baseball in 1988?  How 'bout we make
    just a slight amendment to your original claim on Pittsburgh, leave 
    those *true* Minnesota Twins fans alone, make *you* the greatest 
    embarrassment in the history of ::SPORTS, and leave it at that!?  
    Deal?
    
    glenn
      
3.783;-)HAVASU::HEISERthe sky is cryinFri Nov 08 1991 14:551
    Hey Glen!  That's no fair using facts on a paraphraser!
3.784They need to DG..RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOKeep Religion Out of Politics!!Fri Nov 08 1991 15:103
    Interesting that most of those numbers are for AL teams.  
    
    JD
3.785nice try but you fell downANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureFri Nov 08 1991 15:4735
    First, I question the accuracy a your information.  The antediluvean
    numbers may or may not be real, but no way in HELL was Shea half-empty
    for the 88 NLCS.  I lived in the New York area at the time, and people
    we're willing to kill for a ticket, any ticket.
    
    As for me being wrong, so sorry Waugamain, but I think everybody finds
    the Pittsburgh squalor the MOST embarrassing for three reasons:
    
    1) It was the 2nd year in a row for the sad-sack Pittsburgh feigns.
    
    2) It was a game7 in a classic LCS, one a the best ever.
    
    3) The feigns who failed to show up (for the 2nd year in a row) had
       spent the previous spring puffing their concave chests about how
       much better they were than fans from a certain other town.
    
    You know how much I hate to let you down, Waugamain, given how heavy
    your breathing was thinking that you had *finally* nailed poor MrT.
    
    But embarrssment is a emotion, and it's a relative thing.  You cain't
    simply apply dry dastisticks (tm) to quantify something as nebulous 
    as embarassment (or even mortification).
    
    I think I've made a persuasive case that you Pittsburgh people managed
    to embarrass yourselves and baseball and all a sport more so than any
    ever before.
    
    You people have pioneered the lowest moment in the history a sport.
    
    Sorry, old friend.  I confer upon you a "E" for effort but you fell
    short (as with the missing linkage [pun fully intended 8^] on my 
    alleged hypocrisy)...
    
    MrT(wins YEAH !!)
                         
3.786CAM::WAYIf it's no' Scottish it's CRAP!Fri Nov 08 1991 15:527

The knackerman came and took the dead horse you guys are trying to beat
a week ago......


8^)
3.787You've been burnt, T. Burnt bad (really kinda sad. Sniff)GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Nov 08 1991 16:1441
    
>    First, I question the accuracy a your information.  The antediluvean
>    numbers may or may not be real, but no way in HELL was Shea half-empty
>    for the 88 NLCS.  I lived in the New York area at the time, and people
>    we're willing to kill for a ticket, any ticket.
     
    Well, maybe if those New Yorkers had spent a little less effort killing
    for a ticket and just walked up to the box office, the 12,000 empty
    seat embarrassment could have been prevented.  (The number I gave
    is o-fish-ul and accurate!)
                 
>   1) It was the 2nd year in a row for the sad-sack Pittsburgh feigns.
    
    Similar instances clearly documented, most conspicuously Minnesota
    1969-70. 
    
>   2) It was a game7 in a classic LCS, one a the best ever.
                                                                    
    Similar instances clearly documented, including ultimate games of 1973 
    ALCS, 1981 NLCS, and 1985 ALCS (historically Games 6 and 7 are more 
    poorly attended than earlier, guaranteed games-- fact).
          
>   3) The feigns who failed to show up (for the 2nd year in a row) had
>      spent the previous spring puffing their concave chests about how
>      much better they were than fans from a certain other town.
       
    Yeah, right.  And there weren't any slings directed in the other
    direction from at least one resident of America's hockey hotbed?
    
>   But embarrssment is a emotion, and it's a relative thing.  You cain't
>   simply apply dry dastisticks (tm) to quantify something as nebulous 
>   as embarassment (or even mortification).
                                                                     
>   I think I've made a persuasive case that you Pittsburgh people managed
>   to embarrass yourselves and baseball and all a sport more so than any
>   ever before.

    Haw haw haw haw haw!
    
    glenn
    
3.788FiniANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureFri Nov 08 1991 16:594
    Glenn, I'll take that hallow guffaw to be your admission a defeat on
    this.  No hard feeling, bud.
    
    MrT(riumpuhant)
3.789No hard feelings, bud. ;-)GUSHER::WAUGAMANFri Nov 08 1991 17:191
    
3.790spring-to-fall ---> Pittsburghians' NightmareANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureFri Nov 08 1991 17:511
    
3.791CELTIK::JACOBALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGotFri Nov 08 1991 17:5516
    
    >>Hmmmm, so now it's up to 15,000 empty seats according to those frauds
    >>in the Pittsburgh Pirates organization.  So long as you're coming
    >>clean, RaKe, any admissions outta them on how their ticket x-up cover
    >>story was faked?
    
    Re the seat count, there were 12,000 empty on the night of game 7, and
    3,000 noshows the night of game 6 in the 42 degree weather.
    
    Re your lame assertion of a "cover-up", talk to Steve Greenberg of the
    Pirates, he's the one who took the blame for lasted year.
    
    Please send away for a mail order life "T",
    
    JaKe
    
3.792ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureFri Nov 08 1991 18:045
    Does this mean you're finished bragging about Pittsburgh fans, FaKe?
    
    I would certainly hope so, for *everybody's* sake, RaKe !!
    
    MrT
3.793CELTIK::JACOBALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGotFri Nov 08 1991 18:116
    Does this mean your done ragging on Pittsburgh fans, cons"T"ipa"T"ed??
    
    I would certainly hope so, for everybody's sake, cons"T"ipa"T"ed !!
    
    JaKe
    
3.794RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOKeep Religion Out of Politics!!Fri Nov 08 1991 19:099
    Acrtually - all MrT has done is give some of you guys a kind of 'in yo
    face' move with this 'discussion'.  Last year, the NoStar 'fans' were
    railed on unmercifully in here as bandwagon jumpers, not real fans,
    etc.  (Probably true...)  And it was also noted how great the
    pittsburgh fans were.  Now, you have a lot of empty seats for the most
    important game of the Pirates season, and T is giving a little reverse
    screw.  
    
    JD
3.795ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureFri Nov 08 1991 19:379
3.796CELTIK::JACOBALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGotFri Nov 08 1991 22:4438
    re.794
    
    As I've stated in past replies, it erked me to no end to see all of
    those seats open in the lasted game of the NLCS.  I don't have any idea
    as to why the people stayed away that night, so I ain't gonna try and
    analyze it.  But for "T" to say the fans are horrible for bailing out
    on that game is utter BS.. The Bucs set team attendance figures for the
    season, averaging over 25k per game, and set 3 Rivers attendance
    records in games 1 & 2 of the NLCS.  Game 6 had 54,000 in attendance
    even though it was 42 degrees at game time.  All seats for game 6 were
    gonzo.  For some reason, game 7 didn't sell.  Possibly because the
    locals thought they'd take it in 6, but I don't know.  As GW stated, it
    is not the first time that NLCS games had less than outstanding
    attendance.  Seeing some of the numbers he posted on attendance for LCS
    games, "T" is just ragging on Pgh as much as he can before midnight
    comes around and his chariot turns back into a pumpkin(not one of
    Hawk's I hope).
    
    I got on him lasted year(earlier this year) for the NoStars fans. 
    Lessee, they turned out at a rate of what, 2000 or 3000 per game. 
    Hell, the NoStars owner couldn't pay people to go to games.  In the
    meantime, the Penguins were averaging over 16k/game.  Not bad in a
    house that holds 16,900.  So, the NoStars back into the playoffs with a
    record that sipped very indiscreetly, and Biff calls Muffy to see if
    she wants to get in the Beamer, take some Brie and sushi and crappy
    tasting wine, and go to the playoffs cause it's fashionable and
    yuppy-ish in Minny-Sordid.  Personally, if you ask me, I'll tell you
    which fans were being true to their team and which ones were all of the
    sudden showing up 'cause it was "the thing to do".
    
    I said it before and I'll say it again, and this time I will stick to
    it,  this is over, done with, and useless to beat anymore(alThough we
    know someone wonT leT iT die{hinTs given), and I'm not arguing iT
    anymore.  WhaTs iT going To prove??????  One person spouting "Nyah Nyah
    Nyah Nyah Nyah"'s at the other.  Drop it, leave it to rest.
    
    JaKe
    
3.797ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureSat Nov 09 1991 01:1218
    >it erked me to no end...
    
    Wail, if it "erked" you to no end I'm satisifed, FaKe.  Now, I know
    that this will no doubt elicit yet another comment about my Ring of
    Fire (but whatever turns you on), but when you brag on about how the 
    Pirates managed to set team attendance [sic] figures for the season,
    averaging a paltry 25K per game, and managed to set 3 rivers attendance
    records in a playoff game, and put 50K in seats despite what you claim
    were 42 degree temperatures (so what), well, again, I cain only extend
    you heartfelt congrat's on your so very fine defense of those tens of
    thousands of empty seats in game7 a a classic NLCS.
    
    Cut it however you like, but suffice it to say that henceforth you'll
    keep your mouth shut about Pittsburgh feigns, cuz they're nobodies.
    
    And that's a FACK.
    
    MrT(wins WIN yeah O YEAH !!)
3.798Dragged back in for yet one more replyCELTIK::JACOBALIMONY:ScrewinYaGet4daScrewinYaGotSat Nov 09 1991 02:1219
    
    >>averaging a paltry 25K per game, and managed to set 3 rivers attendance
    
    And just how many did the Twinkies average?????  25,001/game
    
    >>you heartfelt congrat's on your so very fine defense of those tens of
    >>thousands of empty seats in game7 a a classic NLCS.
    
    Not defending empty seats in game 7 Oh "T"(wister of words), just the
    fans of Pgh.
    
    >>    that this will no doubt elicit yet another comment about my Ring of
    >>Fire (but whatever turns you on), but when you brag on about how the 
    
    Can't elicit "another" comment about any "ring of fire", cause I've
    never commented on it before anyways.
    
    JaKe
    
3.799ANGLIN::SHAUGHNESSYJane &amp; Ted's Bogus AdventureSat Nov 09 1991 13:4517
    You've made dozens of scatalogical references to me.  Not that I'm
    offended by your dirty language.  Only thing about it that offends
    me is the lazy writing that goes into it and how unfunny it is.
    
    As for not defending the empty seats but defende "Pgh fans," I'm
    afraid you'll have to accept the fact that it was these very same
    "Pgh fans" who failed to sell-out consecutive NLCSs.
    
    In Joe Face, buddy.  Last spring you were putting down fan support
    in another city and boasting about "Pgh fans"; this year your defending
    NLCS games with thousands of empty seats for lack of fan support (but
    plenty of feign support).  
    
    If we take anything out of this it's that the ticket mix-up story from
    last year was FaKe.
    
    MrT
3.800Glavine wins CyCNTROL::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 13 1991 17:152
    Tom Glavine of the Atlanta Braves was named the NL Cy Young Award
    winner for 1991.
3.801CELTIK::JACOBBare It and GrinWed Nov 13 1991 18:168
    re.800
    
    Lee Smith came in second, and John Smiley of the Bucs earned himself a
    $50,000 incentive from a clause in his contract that if he finished in
    the top 3 in the voting for the Sie Yung, he got the extra cash.
    
    JaKe
    
3.802Leyland or Cox? Or someone else?SHALOT::MEDVIDcute in a stupidass wayWed Nov 13 1991 18:377
    Who do you think the NL manager of the year will be, Leyland or Cox? 
    Last to first is pretty impressive and will probably earn Cox the
    votes, but I've got to give my personal nod to Leyland for pulling the
    Pirates together after the spring training fiascos and clinching the
    division so early.
    
    	--dan'l
3.803Cox already won a coupla weeks, ago, dan'l... ;-(GUSHER::WAUGAMANWed Nov 13 1991 18:531
    
3.804fwiwFRETZ::HEISERI don't feel tardyWed Nov 13 1991 20:116
    Re: Glavine
    
    He reportedly is a decent hockey player too.  Decent enough to get
    drafted by an NHL team.
    
    Mike
3.805CAMONE::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Wed Nov 20 1991 15:3326
Well, the other evening I had an opportunity to catch the 
Greatest Moments In Baseball on SPORTSchannel.

It was Game 6, 1952 World Series, NY Yankees vs Brooklyn Dodgers.

What an experience!


To see guys like Mickey Mantle, Jackie Robinson, Carl Furillo, 
Phil Rizuto, Billy Martin....  What a rush.  To see Campanella play.


It was interesting in many ways too, because the TV coverage was
primitive at best, and clearly the play by play guy (who doubled
for color) called it more like a radio game with a few TVisms than
what we're used to today...

I never thought about it before, but there were no batting helmets
back then!

And considering that Brooklyn moved out to LA in the year I was born,
it was neat to see what it was like when they were still in Ebbets field....



'Saw
3.806FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Nov 20 1991 15:4110
    I watched it for a while and one of the things I noticed was how much
    more quickly the game was played:
    
    1.  Pitchers threw strikes and didn't nibble.  They worked quickly.
    2.  Batters didn't step out on every pitch.  In fact, they seldom
        stepped out at all.
    
    I wish it could be like that now.  
    
    John
3.807CAMONE::WAYThe King of the Droods(tm)Wed Nov 20 1991 18:293
Also, many more batters had an amazingly open stance!

Perhaps it was because of the dimensions of Ebbets Field, I don't know....
3.808GENRAL::WADEthe buck of the IrishThu Nov 21 1991 17:595
    
    	Terry Pendleton won the MVP.  Bonds wonders if his attitude
    	had anything to do with it.  <snicker>
    
    	Claybone
3.809I wish they would have dealt himGRANPA::RFAGLEYthings that make you go hmmmm...Mon Nov 25 1991 14:503
    All that talent....
    
    ... and the brains of an ice cube.... Bonds needs to get a clue...
3.810PTOVAX::JACOBMy Golf Handicap?? Showing up!!!!Tue Nov 26 1991 00:095
    Expos traded Galaraga(sp?) to the Cards for pitcher Ken Hill, today.
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.811OLDTMR::RACZKACant cheat with notes, gotta sing emSat Dec 07 1991 15:2412
    I know that this is late
    
    But the LA DODGERS sent Tim Belcher to the REDS for 
    Eric (.44 magnum) Davis
    
    They also resigned Orel and picked up Tom Candiotti
    
    Now all we need is a GOOD first baseman (Wally Joyner??)
    and wait for Spring Training to start (-:
    
    Go Dodgers!
    
3.812PEACHS::MITCHAMNever scratch a mounted monkeyFri Dec 13 1991 09:283
    Otis Nixon signed a 2-year contract with Atlanta yesterday.
    
    -Andy
3.813Reds and Mets are the winners of the Hot Stove LeagueAXIS::ROBICHAUDRedSox,Broncos,MoriaLaschFri Dec 13 1991 11:331
    
3.814FDCV07::KINGBe nice to me, I'm a Pheresis Donor!!Fri Dec 13 1991 12:023
    Me thinks the Dodgers came away as the winners.....
    
    REK
3.815Royals landed what they wanted alsoCTHQ1::LEARYbusted flat in baton rougeFri Dec 13 1991 12:481
    
3.816Ballclub, ballclub, ballclub, ballclubAXIS::ROBICHAUDRedSox,Broncos,MoriaLaschFri Dec 13 1991 13:234
    	...and Lou (Costello) Gorman watched every possible Red Sox
    trade go by the boards.
    
    				/Don
3.817CAMONE::WAYYou'll be left with empty armsMon Feb 24 1992 12:1319
Happened to catch Game 4 of the 1969 World Series yesterday
on Sports Channel.

What a rush to see all those ballplayers that I remember from my youth....

Boog Powell, Ron Swoboda (un-CONSCIOUS catch in RF to keep the Mets 
in it), Tug McGraw, Elrod Hendricks, Cleon Jones, Budd Harrelson,
Donn McClendon.....



The only thing that spoiled the afternoon for me was they showed an
ad for a videotape of the 1986 World Series, and every Sox fan in the
world can guess which highlight they showed.   I damn neared choked
on my beer......



'Saw
3.818CSC32::J_HERNANDEZThe Devil(dog) made me do it.Mon Feb 24 1992 16:563
    That's Clendenon.
    
    No need to thank me.
3.819CAMONE::WAYYou'll be left with empty armsMon Feb 24 1992 17:0012
>    That's Clendenon.
>    
>    No need to thank me.

Right you are.  I knew that too.

However, if you'll notice that the time stamp was before 10am, you'll
notice that I was still on weekend time, and not yet awake.....8^)


'Saw

3.820CSC32::J_HERNANDEZThe Devil(dog) made me do it.Mon Feb 24 1992 17:081
    O.k. you are forgiven. I'm still on weekend time. Mah haid hurts.
3.821AXIS::ROBICHAUDThe ProdiROGERgal Son Returns!Tue Mar 03 1992 11:216
    	Sandberg signed a contract extension that will pay him 7.1 million
    dollars a year when it kicks in.  How can these owners blame
    arbitration for the huge salaries when they basically set the worth
    of players with these kind of contracts?
    
    				/Don
3.822RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 11:4123
Wow.

This is really starting to get ridiculous.  I mean 7.1 million dollars
a year.   I'm no expert, but it sounds to me like that money would go
a long way towards finding a cure for leukemia, or helping to build
a shelter for homeless people.


Is anyone (and I mean anyone) really WORTH 7.1 million a year?  For playing
ball? 

Hell, 7.1 million would go a long way if you pumped it into programs to
increase American technology and stuff.....


And this guy is getting it for playing baseball?


Sorry if this seems like a downer, but I really think this is getting
ridiculous.....


'Saw
3.823SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesTue Mar 03 1992 11:564
       These guys are worth whatever the Chowderhaid owners wanna pay them.
    I have no sympathy for MLB owners. That's why I go to 1 game every
    couple years.
                                     Denny
3.824Second-tier players not worth it; Sandberg every pennyNAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 03 1992 12:0720
    Sandberg's contract is being reported as a $7 million/year deal, but it
    was actually tacked on as an extension to his current 1992 contract (a
    paltry $2.1 mil) that leaves him at just over $6 million/year.  Not
    that it makes much difference, but over the five year period, the
    contract is worth only slightly more than Bonilla's.  I have less
    complaint with Sandberg's contract than Bonilla's because Sandberg is 
    a bonafide Hall of Famer who truly *is* the Chicago Cubs.  He's one of 
    the few that's probably worth $10 million/year to his club (my own 
    favorite Cal Ripken, whom the Orioles are dragging their feet with,
    being another...).
    
    Honest question: why do people protest baseball based on what the
    players make rather than the cost to the consumer?  I mean, hockey
    players generally don't make squat but it costs a small fortune to go
    to a game (at least around here), but people don't complain much.  
    Isn't that backwards?
    
    glenn
     
3.825PFSVAX::JACOBOwner of 'This Old F_____g House!'Tue Mar 03 1992 12:1621
    
    >>contract is worth only slightly more than Bonilla's.  I have less
    >>complaint with Sandberg's contract than Bonilla's because Sandberg is 
    >>a bonafide Hall of Famer who truly *is* the Chicago Cubs.
    
    I agree.  Bonilla is a stiff who CAN hit for power and average, but
    absolutely SUCKS in the field.  Average to below average defense.
    
    The Pirates payroll this year is somewhere in the region of $30-35 mil.
    If they sold the same amount of seats at Three Rivers as they did
    lasted year, they bring in ~$18-22 mil.  Add to that concessions and
    endorsements and you still don't meet the payroll.  These morons, both
    players and owners, will feel the real pinch when the nexted TV
    contract time comes up.  The league will have to go to salary caps or
    revenue sharing across the league, or teams in the small markets will
    be playing out of the back of a moving van.  I personally feel the
    Pirates will be in some other city within 5 years unless something is
    done.
    
    JaKe
    
3.826RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 12:1916
Glenn,

You raise an excellent point.  I'd never thought of it that way.  I can
sit in the bleachers at the Sox games for $7 (or a voucher if Hawk has
procured the tickets) yet to go to a Whalers game, the cheap seat are $15!


I realize that Sandberg is a franchise player, but the dollar amounts are
just starting to boggle my mind.


I wonder if hockey arenas were larger (say on the order of the Hoosier
Dome) if the prices would be lower.  It would seem so.....


'Saw
3.827CELTIK::JACOBOwner of 'This Old F*@#$%g House'!!!Tue Mar 03 1992 12:2414
    
>>I wonder if hockey arenas were larger (say on the order of the Hoosier
>>Dome) if the prices would be lower.  It would seem so.....
    
    Good point. 'Saw.
    
    Figger the hawkey teams play 40 home games in 16,000-17,000 seat
    houses, whilst the baseball teams play 81 home games in 50k-60k
    houses.
    
    Cheap seats in Pgh go for $4.50, or on Buck night, $1.
    
    JaKe
    
3.828RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 12:3311
And if you think about it, they play hoops in the Hoosier Dome
(which seats 74,500 for Wrasslemania) and the hoops court is smaller
than a hockey rink, so the people up in the nosebleed seats should
be able to see....


The Hartford Civic Center is about 13,9 I think, although they've had
few sellouts this year....


'Saw
3.829TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna be a sister!!!Tue Mar 03 1992 12:4421
3.830CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsTue Mar 03 1992 12:5311
    Don't forget the HUGE difference in radio and tv contracts, and
    following that, the amount baseball teams cain charge for advertizing
    at the park. All in all that's a pretty big difference. People know
    hockey has no big contract with TV and the local agreements are
    penny-ante compared to baseball thus the smaller salaries for hockey
    players. 
    Percentage of ticket sale generation revenue to overall revenue
    in baseball is much smaller in baseball than hockey.
    
    MikeL
     
3.832if I read the article correctlyCNTROL::CHILDSThe SYSTEM has spung a leakTue Mar 03 1992 13:038
 not to mention the nice little 32K bonus all the players got as their part
 of the liscensing and selling of equipment....of course the union kept 1/2
 just in case of a strike.....

 Atleast Sandberg is an everyday player. IMO pitchers are the worst offenders..

 mike
3.833Operating cost analysis doesn't mean much to the consumer...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 03 1992 13:1623
    
    That's overanalyzing, guys.  Why should you care about stadium size,
    merchandizing, and TV dollars when you shell out your money for
    tickets?  Do you really say to yourself "well the Bruins don't have a
    national television contract and I understand the owner's predicament
    so I don't feel so bad about plunking down the 25-30 dollars for a
    ticket"?  I know I don't.  I feel a gut-level reaction to the money 
    that's vacated my wallet.  Less than $200 a year for a partial season 
    ticket (28 games) for an excellent centerfield bleacher seat doesn't 
    feel bad to me, so I go for it.  And as Jake indicates, due to park 
    size the Red Sox have the highest cheap-seat ticket price in the league.
    
    Imagine, in 1992, $1 a ticket for selected games and all sorts of other 
    $2-$5 family bargains to see a two-time division champion as in 
    Pittsburgh!  And yet if you go to Pittsburgh (as I just did) people are 
    still seething mad at the Pirates at the same time they're shelling out 
    5-10 times that cost to sell out games for the Penguins and the 
    mediocre Steelers.  My reaction as a baseball fan is to say let Bonilla 
    and Bonds go if they want and I'll enjoy the action at such a price just 
    the same...
    
    glenn
      
3.834You buyin' tonight,Glenn?! 8^)'sCTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsTue Mar 03 1992 13:3017
    Glenn,
    I never said I felt bad for the hockey owners. I understand the
    financials of both sports and I feel that I get a better bang for
    my buck ( albeit more at the Gahden) by watching not-so-overpaid
    hockey players. I perceive, perhaps falsely, a hungrier athlete
    on ice. And I loves baseball. But knowing how much GD money both
    the owners and players make from huge stadium,TV and merchandizing
    and not my paltry ticket price ( in comparsison to hockey) then
    I say, they better not raise the ticket prices appreciably. All in
    all, we all pay for it in the long run.
    
    Final thoughts?? I'll go to more baseball games 'cuz it's more
    affordable, but if I could afford it,and I ain't bitchin',I'd git
    hockey season tix. 
    
    MikeL
    
3.835PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 03 1992 13:416
3.836I'll buy for the "hungry" SPORTShroomers... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 03 1992 13:5721
    Agreed that all that matters is whether you feel you're getting your
    money's worth (with anything, not just sports, and including beer!), 
    Mike.  To me, for whatever reason, player salaries don't enter into 
    it much.  I do pay attention to salaries and the business end of the
    game, but really only to the extent that I feel there could be damage 
    done to the sport (like in baseball's small markets).  Other than that, 
    I figure there's all sorts of injustices regarding distribution of
    wealth in the world so I'm not going to get hung up on just this one
    (which in cumulative doesn't amount to a hill of beans anyway), where 
    as with any job the employee generally gets paid relative to the money 
    he brings into the company. 
    
    At a personal level, all the athletes in all the major professional
    sports are making so much money compared to what's needed to subsist in
    this world that I have a hard time generalizing about one group versus 
    another.  After some cut-off point around a couple hundred grand 
    (accounting for the shortness of career), it's all relative to me...
    
    glenn
    
3.837RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 14:1016
Yeah, agreed.

To me, a player's salary really doesn't enter into my enjoyment of
the game.  (Unless we're talking John "Sweet Boy" Cullen).


But the amounts of money these guys are making, even considering shortness
of career is amazing.  With investments (good ones) and pulling some money
out to go to school (law school, med school etc) these guys have it made.


It would be nice to see some of this money that they are being paid being
put into something really worthwhile....


'Saw
3.838Unimaginable......7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Tue Mar 03 1992 14:2622
    
    Welcome to the Theatre of the Absurd, folks!
    
    Just to sprinkle a little more "jealousy dust" on the plate,
    have you ever figured how many years/decades/lifetimes you would
    have to work at your present $$$ level to equal the money these
    guys will "earn" in one year?
    
    Since we're in the Theatre, let's not stop at professional athletes.
    Just for giggles, doit with rock singers and tee vee folks like Bill
    Cosby.
    
    Then remember what a terror it is to make "essential" ends meet each
    month and the sweat and stress you live with on a daily basis.
    
    For me, it goes so far beyond depressing that I came around to the see
    the absolute lunacy and humor of how %#*& we are!
    
    I remain,
    churning the treadmill,
    Kev
    
3.839PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Mar 03 1992 14:314
3.840MCIS1::DHAMELForgot to cut my imbecilical cordTue Mar 03 1992 14:5810
    
    So right about the Stallones and the Cosbys and The Michael Jacksons
    making the same kind of dough and nobody seems to begrudge the fact.
    
    Sanberg pulls down around $44K per game on the average.  BTW, what does
    a Marino or a Montana get paid on a per-game basis?  Methinks it's
    quite a bit more.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.841AXIS::ROBICHAUDThe ProdiROGERgal Son Returns!Tue Mar 03 1992 15:276
    	People see most entertainers as intelligent (not so), but view 
    most athletes as stupid (also not so).  I would love to see how
    the owners are going to justify a lockout next spring.  Their motto
    could be "Save us from ourselves".
    
    				/Don
3.842RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 16:4310
Actually, I don't think entertainers' salaries (income, whatever) doesn't
always get the same amount of press that athletes do.

I mean, when you think about it, we hear almost weekly how so-and-so
got a record salary etc etc etc.

Usually, we don't hear that often about what Sly makes or Michael Jackson...


'Saw
3.843SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesTue Mar 03 1992 17:013
       The entertainers mentined make Sandberg money for ONE album or
    movie. They make athletes look like paupers.
                                       Denny
3.844RUGBY1::wayYou'll be left with empty armsTue Mar 03 1992 17:238
Now you know why I'm gonna write a novel someday....

Writers don't make as much as movie stars, but they make more than
I do....  Plus, it's something I know how to do.  I think I can spin
a pretty good yarn when I have to....


'Saw
3.845AXIS::ROBICHAUDThe ProdiROGERgal Son Returns!Tue Mar 03 1992 17:286
    	I think I'll write a novel someday about how much money
    entertainers and athletes make.  I read somewhere that the four
    starting pitchers for the Mets make more money than the entire Houston
    Astros team.
    
    				/Don
3.846New twist on Baseball ClasicsRIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOGetting Rich: The United WayThu Mar 05 1992 12:5952
From USA TODAY:

A modern twist on some baseball 'classics':

The  modern version of Satchel Paige's six famous secrets to staying 
young:

1.  Avoid short-term contracts, which angry up the blood.
2.  If your general manager disputes you, lie down and pacify yourself 
with thoughts of free agency.
3.  Keep the deferred payments flowing, no matter which team you move 
to.
4.  Go very light on the vices, such as extra batting practice or team 
photos.  Being unduly conscientious isn't restful.
5.  Avoid free autographs at all times.
6.  Don't look back.  The IRS may be gaining on you.


The modern version of "Casey at the Bat":

The outlook wasn't brilliant for the Mudville nine that day.
The players wanted millions, and the owner wouldn't pay.
And when Cooney went free agency, and Barrows did the same
A prickly silence fell upon the agents of the game.
A struggling few got up to go, in deep despair.  The rest
CLung to that hope which 'springs eternal in the human brest.'
They thought if only, somehow, fans would give the owner fault
He'd have to put up tons of dough and let Casey at the vault.

But the owner disliked Casey, and his slumping RBI
'And overpaid to boot,' he said, as he looked them in the eye
So upon the stricken multitude, grim meloncholy sought
For there seemed little chance of Casey's getting to the vault
Oh, somewhere in this favoured land, the sun is shining bright
THe band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light
ANd somewhere agents are laughing, with profits unabated
But there is no joy in MUdville - mighty Casey just got traded.


T---

The modern "Take Me Out To The Ballgame"

Take me out to the ballgame, take me out to the crowd
Box seats here in right, thirty bucks for two.
Parking or hot dogs, they'll stick it to you.
And we'll pay, pay, pay for the home team.
Who cares, they hit .213?
And if they don't win, we'll still do it again at the old ballgame


3.847BSS::JCOTANCHThu Mar 05 1992 14:2313
    The Cubs rejected a vote that would've sent them and the Cards to the
    NL West and sent Atlanta and Cincinnati to the NL East starting next
    season.  They were afraid it might cut into their mega-profits because
    WGN would end up with many late games due to the Flubs playing on the
    Coast more often.  However, some West Coast owners offered to move up
    some starting times but the Flubs still said no.  And another thing is
    teams will probably be playing a 13-12 schedule next year (13 games
    against each team in their division, 12 against each team from the
    other division), so regardless of which division the Cubs are in they 
    would still play pretty much the same schedule.
    
    
    Joe
3.848SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu Mar 05 1992 14:524
    Ha ha ha, very good, JD.  I was laughing so hard, I couldn't find
    you're slam on Bhanstan.  :*)
    
    lEe
3.849Look at a MAPSALES::THILLThu Mar 05 1992 14:538
What about the Braves and Reds, you'd think they'd get pretty tired of all 
the travel? They are in the EASTERN time zone to boot. I wonder why they didn't 
make it more geographically alligned when they first did this in 1968?

For some reason, Atlanta always seems to get stuck in the Western divisions. The
Falcons and braves are, as were the Flames and Hawks when they had that format.

Tom/Dread 
3.850AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Mar 05 1992 15:044
    	lEe, there was no slam on Boston because the article was from
    the USA Today.  8^)
    
    				/Don
3.851RIPPLE::DEVLIN_JOAchoo! You're SO Good LookingThu Mar 05 1992 15:085
    Nice p_name /Don - stay up all night thinking that one up!
    
    ;-)
    
    JD
3.852AXIS::ROBICHAUDThu Mar 05 1992 15:201
    	P-Name strike 'cuz I'm in sympathy wif' the NHL players.
3.853ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Mar 05 1992 15:365
    SH*T, a 13-12 balanced schedule sucks big time. Makes no sense
    toplay more games out of division then in division. gag!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.854rough notes28918::JACOBSend Solar Panel Wax, Soon!!!Tue Mar 10 1992 02:5925
    
    Pittsburgh Pirate manager Jim Leyland's new contract will pay him $3.7
    million over the nexted five years.
    
    Joe Nuxhall, the youngest man to appear in a major league game when he
    pitched at age 15  for Cincinnati, is recovering from prostrate cancer
    surgery.  Nuxhall is hoping to return to his job as Cincinnati color
    commentator within the next two weeks.
    
    The Pirates Steve Buechele, everyone assumed, was a shoe-in to win the
    Gold glove at third base in the American League, even though he spent
    the lasted month of the season with the Pirates.  After all, he had
    just set a record for fewest errors.  But the gold Glove went to White
    Sox' Robin Ventura.  It was implyed that Ventura got the Gold Glove
    becuase he had the better OFFENSIVE year.  Ventura batted .284, hit 23
    HR's and drove in 100 runs while playing on a pennant contending team. 
    His defensive statistics, you ask????  Ventura's average of one error
    for every 24 chances was WORST in the American League and his 18 errors
    were the most by ANY A.L. 3rd baseman.   Great Gold Glove statistics,
    eh??
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
3.855EARRTH::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Tue Mar 10 1992 15:307
    Gold Gloves can be bogus. It *should* reward defense, but in fact
    offensive players and reps often win out. Many feel that Clete Boyer
    should have won a few GG's in the 60's, but Brooks Robinson got 'em
    because of his superior power hitting. Barry Larkin should have gotten
    one a couple of years ago, but Oz had the rep. Pete O'Brien is as good
    as Mattingly (according to many experts), but didn't ring up the
    monster #'s that Don did from 85-89, so he lost out ...
3.856Buechele needs to learn the Pittsburgh turf, however...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 10 1992 15:5527
   > Gold Gloves can be bogus. It *should* reward defense, but in fact
   > offensive players and reps often win out. Many feel that Clete Boyer
   > should have won a few GG's in the 60's, but Brooks Robinson got 'em
   > because of his superior power hitting.
    
    Horse manure!  I'm not saying that Brooks Robinson deserved the Gold
    Glove each and every year, but he didn't win them because of his bat.
    Brooks Robinson is just about everyone's pick as the greatest defensive
    third baseman of all time.  Reputation carried him the last few years,
    which is unfortunate.  Who sold you this "power hitting" bill of goods, 
    Doc?
    
    Steve Buechele would have won the Gold Glove last year, hands down, if
    he'd stayed in the league.  His move to the NL, and not Robin Ventura's
    offense, almost certainly cost him the award (offense, or overall
    reputation, has definitely been a factor in other cases...).
    
    By the way, errors and fielding percentage are almost useless as a
    measure of defensive ability.  The difference in number of errors 
    between the worst and best fielding percentages pales in comparison to
    the difference in the number of balls successfully fielded.  More 
    errors is often the penalty for having great range.  Ventura did pretty 
    well with his assist totals; Buechele did even better, though.
    
    glenn
    
3.857CTHQ3::LEARYBeano:PreventGasBeforeItStartsTue Mar 10 1992 16:0211
    Doc,
    You probably saw Brooksie, but were you old enuf to actually see
    Cletus play??  He was good but twas no Brooksie. Trust me. Clete's
    salad days were a tad earlier,I think, than Brooksie's
    
    Your eldar speaketh,
    MikeL
    
    BTW didn't Belanger cop a few Gold Gloves?   Now there was a power
    hitter for ya. Think he took batting lessons from Dean Chance.
    
3.858JARETH::YANKOWSKASOrioles in '92Tue Mar 10 1992 16:0713
    >	BTW didn't Belanger cop a few Gold Gloves?   Now there was a power
    >   hitter for ya. Think he took batting lessons from Dean Chance.
   
    Yes, Belanger won at least a few Gold Gloves.  Had trouble keeping
    his head above the Mendoza line, but with all the sluggers the O's had
    in their heyday they could afford to keep a defensive specialist in the
    lineup.
    
    And no discussion of "all-time greatest defensive 3B" is complete
    without mentioning one Michael Jack Schmidt...
    
    
    py
3.859tossupSHALOT::HUNTVirginia -- 1992 ACC Women's Hoops ChampsTue Mar 10 1992 16:447
3.860I still say rep and O can overshadow the majority of casesEARRTH::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Tue Mar 10 1992 17:3310
    Glenn, you say my contention on GG's is horse manure, but then tell me
    that Ventura deserved it over Steve B. because he changed leagues ?
    
    Thanks for proving my case. Ventura was ok, but nothing special IMO. As
    for Brooks/Boyer - I don't have an opinion on those two, but it is
    often a case used by the anit-GG's (for lack of a better term).
    
    And you never said anything about O'Brien/Mattingly, or Larkin/Smith.
    
    Keep trying ...
3.861As you say, keep trying...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Mar 10 1992 17:4310
    
    I agreed with 95% of what you said, Doc (don't be so sensitive!).  I
    only disagreed about the part about Brooks Robinson, where you made it
    sound like, in the rational for the 16 straight Gold Gloves, defense 
    was almost an afterthought.  The emotion of my response?  Well,
    Brooksie was my favorite player... ;-)
    
    glenn
    
    
3.862EARRTH::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Tue Mar 10 1992 20:115
    re. Brooks R./Glenn's fav ...
    
    Never would have guessed it
    
    :-)
3.863PFSVAX::JACOBOwner of 'This Old F_____g House!'Wed Mar 11 1992 02:435
    Hoo was the firsted baseman on the Orioles whence Brooksie was in his
    prime???
    
    JaKe
    
3.864ROYALT::ASHESometimes you're a windshield...Wed Mar 11 1992 04:441
    Boog?
3.865TNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna be a sister!!!Wed Mar 11 1992 11:3616
Definitely Boog Powell

Without placing a specific year, here's what I remember as the lineup:

 C Elrod Hendricks
1b Boog Powell
2b Bobby Grich
SS Mark Belanger
3B Brooks Robinson
LF Frank Robinson
CF Don Buford
RF Curt Blefary
 P Jim Palmer
 P Mike Cuellar
 P Dave McNally
 P Pat Dobson and a host of others 
3.866Like yesterday...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 11 1992 11:478
    
    Paul Blair played center, Frank Robinson played right most of the time,
    and Buford/Blefary/Rettenmund et al played left.  Also, that bane of
    all humanity Davey Johnson played second for the bulk of the glory
    years 1969-71, with Bobby Grich coming in after his deposal.
    
    glenn
    
3.867Just curiousTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna be a sister!!!Wed Mar 11 1992 11:506
What was wrong with Davey Johnson?  I don't remember much about his playing 
except that he had a good rookie year, and showed a lot of promise.  After that
I thought he was just another mediocre second sacker.  Was he a club house 
problem or an on the field problem?

=Bob=
3.868Grich was better, so Johnson became expendable...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Mar 11 1992 12:297
    
> What was wrong with Davey Johnson?
    
    He was the Mets' manager.  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
3.869RUGBY1::waySon House RULES!Wed Mar 11 1992 12:4410
If you catch the Sports Channel re-run of Game 4, 1969 WS, you'll catch
the Orioles lineup in all its glory.

My God, I had forgotten just how big Boog was.  He was a Giant of a man.


I'd love to know where he is and what he's doing now....


'Saw
3.870Boog, Frank and Harmon - three big dudesTNPUBS::MCCULLOUGHLindsey's gonna be a sister!!!Wed Mar 11 1992 12:499
Boog was a big dude.  

Frank Howard was another huge guy of that era, as well as Harmon Killebrew.

I'd have to say that Powell did OK as a fielder, but that it was amazing that, 
at their size, Howard and Killebrew played Left Field and Third Base, 
respectively.   They'd probably DH today.

=Bob=
3.872CommercialsMCIS2::CLAYBROOKWed Mar 11 1992 13:034
    I seem to remember Boog in some of the Miller Lite beer commercials
    when they first started coming out.
    
                                               Dan
3.873EARRTH::BROOKSMoney don't matter 2 night ...Wed Mar 11 1992 14:193
    Killebrew moved to 1B in the mid-late 60's. As for Davey Johnson,
    didn't he also hit 40 HR's for Atlanta the year that Aaron and Evans
    did ?
3.874CELTIK::JACOBDem Pens is suprizing me!!Mon Mar 30 1992 23:366
    Da Cubbies and the White Sox completed a trade today which sends George
    Bell to the ChiSox and the Cubs get an outfielder, something like Sammy
    Sosa, and a pitcher, Ken Patterson????.
    
    JaKe
    
3.875Mets vote <write-lock>!!!!!!7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Wed Apr 01 1992 13:2723
    
    So over the weekend me and the F.E.W., along with my brother and his
    wife travelled down to Manhattan for a wedding.  After checking in
    at the Marriot (Financial Center) I had about an hour to kill
    before it was time to put on the suit and tie so I wandered down to
    the gift shop to buy a newspaper.
    
    Wound up plunking down $0.35 for "Newsday". (big deal right?)
    
    Big banner headlines  " SILENCE OF THE METS " with a picture of a
    NY Mets baseball cap on the cover.  Did anybody know that the Met team
    unanimously voted NOT to speak with the press?  It seems that they feel
    the press is out to get them with all the negative stories about them,
    (ie Cove) and they're gonna retaliate by not speaking.
    
    Po TCM, seems like he's not gonna get any first person quotes thisted
    year.......
    
    I remain,
    thinking of not speaking to the press either......
    
    Kev
    
3.876USCTR2::NAHEARNWed Apr 01 1992 20:0110
    Kev,
    
    I did, in fact, know that the Mets weren't speaking to the
    media....BUT,  I'm not speaking to any of you....so I couldn't tell
    you!!!
    
    
    HTH,
    
    Nelly
3.877CELTIK::JACOBThursday is D-DayWed Apr 01 1992 20:047
    Great,
    
    With the Mets keeping their mouths shut, the relative intelligence
    level of the NL news goes up 2 levels.
    
    JaKe
    
3.878ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 02 1992 08:5310
    Old hat Kev about the Mets was in the NYM notesfile much earlier this
    week. Anyways good move to not answer non-baseball questions which is
    what I beleive they really voted on. Incidentally 99% of the time one
    does not even need to read the papers or watch the news to know
    whatmost players will say after a game.
    
    re: Jake who cares about intelligence level, just win baby!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.879ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 02 1992 08:534
    re: pname - Jake why is Thursday d-day????
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.880Heard it here 1st by me! ;^)7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Thu Apr 02 1992 13:0012
    TcM,
    
    Perhaps on "the other" notefile (which btw, I don't even RON in)
    it's old news but over here in fun fun land, it wasn't reported
    earlier that I.
    
    so there!
    
    I remain,
    a journalism junkie,
    Kev
    
3.881ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Apr 07 1992 16:216
    > Perhaps on "the other" notefile (which btw, I don't even RON in)
    
    And Kev you call yourself a New Yorker. I am truly dismayed and
    disappointed in you. (partial :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
3.882RANGER::LEFEBVREIntel Inside (tm)Tue Apr 07 1992 16:303
    How 'bout dat Bobby Bonilla...
    
    
3.883ha!7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Tue Apr 07 1992 17:0814
    TcM,
    
    Dismaying and disappointing New Yorkers is a lot like rugby!
    
    an an uther thing, I don't call myself a noo yawkah, I'm a
    lung-guylander and I dont do baizeball.  Too boring 'cept
    for get togethers.
    
    hth,
    
    I remain,
    EEEEEEE EEEEEEE EEEEEEE 
    Kev
    
3.884JARETH::YANKOWSKASOrioles 162-0Tue Apr 07 1992 17:241
    No doubt about it, gonna be a rematch of '69 this year. :-)
3.885Phillie NewsRDOVAX::BRAKEWed Apr 08 1992 14:2520
    Saw a picture in the this morning's paper of Lenny Dykstra getting hit
    by a pitch. Turns out there is a fracture in his wrist and he'll be out
    for awhile.
    
    Also noted in the picture that the Phillies were wearing the uniforms
    they used to wear in the 50's. The vertical large stripe that ran down
    the sides of the uniforms was gone and the word "Phillies" was written
    across the front with stars above the i's. The "P" on the hats was the
    old one, too....no baseball inside the loop. The color also seemed to
    be a lighter read (almost the same red as Cincy) instead of the
    burgundy.
    
    Bob Hunt, is this for real or just a one game thing? I loved those
    Phillie iniforms. Recalss those baseball cards of Richie (I belong in
    the Hall of Fame) Ashburn, Robin Roberts at Grady Hammer I used to
    have.
    
    Rich
    
    
3.886Phils lose 8th straight opener ... Sigh.SCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 08 1992 14:3113
The new-old Phillies uniforms are for keeps.   They kept them under wraps all 
spring long right up until the first pitch yesterday.   

Supposedly, the sporting goods stores in the Philly area are up to their 
strike zones in sight-unseen backorders for the new-old style.  I think it's 
great ... I saw my first Phils game in '64 when they wore this style.

Dykstra finished the game yesterday with the broken bone.  Any word how long 
he'll be out ???   These last few days have stirred up Rotis rosters like no 
other spring in recent memory.   Fortunately, ours has avoided any problems 
so far (knock on wood).

Bob Hunt
3.887Sigh!CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSWed Apr 08 1992 14:529
    You cain sigh all yer want about the Phils, Bob ( somewhat
    justifiably), but at least ya gots ONE champeenship in the modern
    era, one more than a certain NE corridor team. Tell me, when was
    the last Phillies champeenship team before (80? 0r 81?).  And didn't
    the old beloved Philly A's chalk up a few "C's" in the 30's??
    
    MikeL
    
    
3.888Try 97 years before the first ringSCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 08 1992 15:2015
3.889FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 15:299
    While in Philadelphia, the Athletics won pennants in 1905, 1910, 1911,
    1913, 1914, 1929, 1930 and 1931.  They won the World Series in 1910,
    1911, 1913, 1929 and 1930.  Their pennant streak was interrupted in
    1912 by the Red Sox and they lost the 1914 World Series to the Boston
    Braves.  Since moving to Oakland, they won pennants in 1972-1974 and
    1988-1990, and the World Series in 1972-1974 and 1989.  So, that's 14
    pennants and 9 World Series.
    
    John
3.890CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSWed Apr 08 1992 16:0211
    didn't realize that that was the Phils only champeenship. But the
    Sox have lost more than their share of Series in imaginable ways.
    So we both cain piss and moan. At least you've personally witnessed
    one, Bob.
    
    MikeL
    Who doesn't want his gravestone to read "Never saw a RedSox World
    Series champion"
    
    
    
3.891RANGER::LEFEBVREIntel Inside (tm)Wed Apr 08 1992 16:1420
3.892Coincidence ???SHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 08 1992 16:2233
3.893RUGBY1::wayShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Wed Apr 08 1992 16:3324
Bob, I agree with a lot of what you said.


With a Red Sox fan, you just KNOW something is gonna happen.  Sitting in that
hotel room in Washington watching game 6 1986 and being a strike away, the
little voice in the back of my head was saying "Frank, don't get excited,
don't get too up -- SOMETHING is gonna happen".


Damned if the same thing didn't happen in '75.  So totally up after Pudge's
Titanic Blast in Game 6, but all the day of Game 7 at school I was like,
"Can't wait, but don't get too up --SOMETHING is gonna happen"...


It kills you, but after the initial wound heals up, you do wear your scars
proudly.....


I think with Cubbies fans, it's different, because my impression is that the
Cubs RARELY get that close.   Except against San Diego when the ball went
through Sandberg's legs....


'Saw
3.894CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSWed Apr 08 1992 16:3514
    AH BELIEVE.
    You've convinced me, Robert. Kindred souls. Both don red. May we both
    get red sackcloth on Good Friday!!
    
    I remembered '64 colossal choke but fergot the late 70 Phils.
    It's a wonder that when these two teams meet in spring training
    there's not a killer tornado or something. Creepy. Imagine a
    Sox-Phils World Series!  And good observation about the Cubs' fans.
    However, since the Phils have that everlasting black mark of a
    champeenship, they will somehow be relegated behind the Cubbies and
    Sox fans on the Sufferin' Index (modern history so-to-speak).
    
    MikeL
     
3.895The almost clubSHALOT::MEDVIDit's just the way i smile, you saidWed Apr 08 1992 16:424
    Any room on this sorrow bandwagon for Bucs fans due to the last two
    years or has Pittsburgh won too many along the way?
    
    	--dan'l
3.896Twas DurhamSHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 08 1992 16:437
3.897Been doneSHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 08 1992 16:478
3.898PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Apr 08 1992 16:505
    In Sunday's Worcester T&G they published a list of the timespans
    without a championship.  There are still several clubs out there that
    haven't won one in their entire history.  The Sox might not have one
    since 1918, but they've been in some of the more memorable championship
    series since then.
3.899FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 16:5610
    I put the timespans in here at some point in the past.  White Sox and
    Cubs have gone longer than the Red Sox.
    
    A&W has often predicted the end of the world would come during the 9th
    inning of a tied 7th World Series game between the Red Sox and Cubs.
    
    Finally, a lot of the 'glitz' of being a Red Sox fan would disappear if
    they ever did win and exorcize the ghosts.
    
    John
3.900On being a Cubs fanIAMOK::WASKOMGoofy's MomWed Apr 08 1992 17:2715
    I happen to be a Cubs fan, although stuck in an AL city and without
    access to WGN.  So I'm not current on 'em.  (Other than they're in
    first -- along with a host of others -- today.)
    
    The Cubs really don't even get close.  As a fan, you don't expect this
    team to be any better than mediocre.  And so, what keeps bringing you
    back is the wonder of Wrigley Field.  The smell of peanuts and popcorn
    and beer.  The happy buzz of people enjoying an afternoon in the sun. 
    The grass and the ivy and the brick and the blue sky with puffy white 
    clouds.  The sound of the crack of the bat and the flapping of flags
    and the swish as the ball is thrown.  There's an innocence to being a
    Cubs fan that no other team, in any other league, seems able to match. 
    And every game is a party, of one sort or another.
    
    A&W
3.901Kinda like yesterday... had a %$%##$ great time at The Stadium ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Apr 08 1992 17:2912
    > Finally, a lot of the 'glitz' of being a Red Sox fan would disappear if
    > they ever did win and exorcize the ghosts.
    
    Not for me.  I could deal with that just fine, thank you.  But then
    again, I've never really gotten caught up in this fatalistic doomsaying
    stuff.  I just try to enjoy it as it comes, and Red Sox baseball if
    nothing else has certainly been interesting over the years (and should
    continue to be so even if they win it all some day...)
    
    glenn
    
3.902And they think a new park will make them win...HA!SALES::THILLWed Apr 08 1992 17:309
    Most of the teams that have never won it are post-1960 expansion teams
    I always thought these teams don't really count, but since a few of
    them have won more than a couple times they probably should. Now it's
    OK to not have won the whole enchilada, but to never have even been a
    contender since Eisenhower was president, now THAT's a disgrace. Every
    team has won at least a division title once, except the Rangers (who
    were second a couple of times) the Mariners and......
    
    Tom
3.903CSGDEC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 17:3421
    Glenn, I realized my statement was an over-broad generalization, but I
    couldn't think of a way to say it as succinctly.  Even glitz was a bad
    choice of word.
    
    There is a large sub-group of Red Sox fans who seem to take great
    pleasure in whining about how they come close and never win.  Bob Ryan
    continually bashes this group by telling them "If you think you have it
    so bad, move to Cleveland."  Among this group of fans are the so-called
    literati - John Updike, George Higgins, George Will and while he was
    alive, Bart Giamatti.  It's for this group that a lot of the fun will
    go out of being a fan - what else will they have to complain about?
    
    In my case, while I love good baseball, there are definite advantages
    to living in Cleveland and being an Indians fan.  There, you can walk
    up to the ticket window 10 minutes before the game and buy a great seat
    in most cases.  It's a reason to envy the folks on the shores of Lake
    Erie.  I first started going to Fenway Park in 1964 when I was 9, and I
    remember how easy it was to get good seats, even for the Yankees and
    even on weekends.
    
    John
3.904SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesWed Apr 08 1992 17:395
       Speaking of the 'literati' types, I heard somewhere that Stephen
    King is donating some of his land (backyard) to the city of Bangor. He
    has, or will build, a replica of Fenway PArk there. I guess the various
    town teams will be able to use it.
                                   Denny
3.905JARETH::YANKOWSKASOrioles 162-0Wed Apr 08 1992 17:426
    re a few back on the Cubs, to this day it still throws me for a loop to
    see a night game from Wrigley (even though they've had the lights for a
    few years now)...
    
    
    py                
3.906Break Like The WindSHALOT::MEDVIDit's just the way i smile, you saidWed Apr 08 1992 17:425
>    He has, or will build, a replica of Fenway PArk there. 
    
    Probably using the same designer that did Spinal Tap's Stone Henge.
    
    	--dan'l
3.907Been done before...SALES::THILLWed Apr 08 1992 17:547
    Some guy in Kaintucky trucked over all the remains from Crosley Field
    in Cinncinati and built a replica of the old park. He has some of the
    outfield walls and part of the scoreboard. The rest was re-created. The
    ineresting thing I remember about Crosley was that there was no warning
    track, just an embankment sloping up to the outfield wall.
    
    Tom 
3.908EARRTH::BROOKSRIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992Wed Apr 08 1992 18:173
    John, another great advantage to Cleveland is that usually have your
    own personal vendor for most of the season, and if a few players get
    injured, you might be called upon to suit up !
3.910CSGDEC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 19:154
    Tommy, I have another reply where I explained myself further.  Keep
    reading after the one you answered.
    
    John
3.911Things will changeSHALOT::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubWed Apr 08 1992 19:3721
3.912RUGBY1::wayShore,Schmidt,Orr,Espo,Cam,Moog,GOD!Wed Apr 08 1992 19:4726
As a New York Giants football fan, perhaps I can shed some light on this.

I waited 20 years for the Giants to be in the Super Bowl.  The day of the
game I was a nervous wreck and wanted to be alone.

I watched the game unfold, and curiously enough, at half time I had a feeling
momentum might swing.  It did.


After 20 years of waiting, and 30 years (a generation) between Championships,
I was ecstatic.   No matter what else happened the next season, the Giants
had a Super Bowl win, and no one could take that away.


I didn't feel the passion was somewhat abated, instead I felt a peace, and
a new way to look at the team from there on out.   The next seasons were
disappoinments, but you could see that the team was always close.   Then
again in 90 they did it.



So as a Sox fan, I think there will be a TON of joy, a bit of relief, and
a sense of renewal......


'Saw
3.913RDOVAX::BRAKEWed Apr 08 1992 20:1745
    My Dad helped me put the whole Red Sox thing in perspective. He grew up
    in Brooklyn and was a die hard Dodger fan. In those days, they were the
    Bums. Fans loved 'em anyway. They either stunk the place out or they
    came close. They were great at blowing the big one. Recall Ralph
    Branca.
    
    As the decade of the 40's came to a close, the Dodgers began to get
    better and better. Their fans became more and more rabid. The 50's came
    upon them and they continued to contend and the fans continued to turn
    out.
    
    They made it to the Series only to lose to the Yankees. Finally, they
    won their first WS. Brooklyn went bananas. 
    
    After the championship, the Dodgers continued to be adored and the
    fans continued their fanaticism. My Dad says it was just a way of life;
    rooting for "Da Dodjers". For those of you who watch the TV show
    "Brooklyn Bridge", according to my Dad, the kids adoration of the
    Dodghers accurately depict the feelings of the post championship era.
    
    I can't speak for Philiadelphia. Never lived there. But I can speak for
    Boston. The Red Sox have teased us since 1967. The Dodgers teased
    Brooklyn from 1947 on. The Red Sox are, indeed, a way of life. The
    mystique of Fenway park, the ghosts of Babe Ruth, Tris Speaker, Smokey
    Joe Wood and Cy Young continue to waft through the rusting steel
    girders. 
    
    Should the Sox win the thing, it will almost surpass the joy I felt
    when my first child was born. I will then see, in my imagination, a
    glow of light shining over Fenway that will keep drawing me. Yeah, I
    guess it IS a religious thing with me. 
    
    My Dad says that there was a lot of cynicism in Brooklyn, just like
    there is in Boston. The only difference between the 2, he says, is that
    Dodger fans just cried when O'Malley took the team west. He says Boston
    fans would be much more violent should anyone ever try to move the Sox.
    
    Interesting afterthought: O'Malley pleaded with the city of New York
    for a new stadium. He also looked for private investments. No private
    investments came. The city said no way. So he moved in 1958.
    Construction of Shea Stadium began 1 1/2 years later.
    
    Rich
    
    
3.914MCIS1::DHAMELIron Mike VS Queen of Mean on PPVWed Apr 08 1992 20:4213
    
    See, being a Sox fan is unlike rugby.  It's like a huge boil on MrT's
    back that's been squeezed to the bursting point but never actually
    gives way.  Instead it continues to irritate and fester.  And every
    season is like seeing a new doctor who clams to have the right
    ingredients to effect a cure, but the damn thing is still there and
    the hope of relief is dashed once again.
    
    -Dickstah, still waiting for the blood- splattering, pus-spattering
     denouement.
    
    P.S. How'd I do, T?
    
3.915Walter O'Malley = Scum of the EarthSALES::THILLWed Apr 08 1992 20:5155
    re .913 Interesting analogy ther with the Brooklyn Dodgers. My father too 
    was a big Dodger fan, so I definitely can relate. 
    
    The thing about O'Malley moving them was that it was a carefully
    orchestrated plan that was clearly pre-meditated and motivted purely 
    by greed. In 1953, when the Braves moved to Milwaukee, their attendance
    boomed. People from all over the upper midwest flocked in droves to
    Milwaukee (even though this wasn't that much closer than Chicago). The
    Braves had some cash, and were able to sign better prospects (this was
    before the draft) and the Dodgers realized they would have to do
    something to compete. So, they traded farm team affiliations with the
    Cubs. 
    
    "What does that have to do with it?" you might ask. The Dodgers
    had St. Paul (Giants were in Minneapolis) and the Cubs had the LA
    Angels of the Pacific Coast League. That meant the Dodgers had
    territorial rights to LA, which by then was growing fast and was
    already a pretty big city. This was about 1955 or so. Meanwhile,
    like much of America, middle class people were leavig cities by droves
    and it was no longer a subway/bus/trolley ride to the ballpark, but a
    car trip. Parks like Ebbets Field and the Polo Grounds had very little
    parking, which was a problem for Dodger fans who were now driving in from
    Lawn Guylin. O'Malley wanted city officials do build them a new
    stadium. Well, if they did it for the Dodgers, they would have to do
    the same for the Giants, and perhaps later, the Yankees too. O'Malley
    proposed a stadium in the Sheepshead Bay section of Brooklyn, far from
    any subway line, but not far from highways leading to L.I. The plan fell
    through. The City proposed a stadium where Shea is now located, but it
    wasn't IN *Brooklyn*, so O'Malley said no. O'Malley proposed a domed
    stadium at the intersection of Atlantic & Flatbush Aves. near downtown.
    They would tear down city blocks to make sure there would be enough
    parking. The city was receptive to meet them part of the way, but then
    O'Malley pulled out, demading that the city pay for everything, and get
    notheing in return. City officials at the time said they would have
    ended up in jail if they had accepted his proposal. 
    
    In 1957 the Dodgers played several "home" games in Roosevelt Stadium in
    Jersey City. Attendance was still pretty good, as they drew over a
    million, which then was considered the milestone for a successful season. 
    
    Meanwhile, Horace Stoneham and the Giants realized they could hold the
    city hostage too, so they started making noise about moving. A lot of
    people didn't realize they weren't bluffing, because the only teams
    that had moved by then (Browns-Orioles, Bos-Mil Braves, Phil-KC A's) were 
    abysmal failures both on the field and at the gate. No way would the
    NL's 2 top franchises move.
    
    When the city realized O'Malley had them over the barrel it was too
    late. So the rest is history. Da Bums moved to LA to become corporate
    America's team, and one of the most successful at the cash register as
    well as on the field. Sure, you could say that it was his right to do
    whatever he wanted to with HIS team, but Brooklyn has never been the
    same since the Dodgers left.     
    
    Tom
3.916FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Apr 08 1992 20:534
    Read a book called "The Dodgers Move West" by Sullivan.  The blame is
    equal on both O'Malley's and the city's part, if I remember right.
    
    John
3.917RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Apr 09 1992 13:2042
    re .915
    
    Excellent not, Tom. However, I've got to think that John is right in
    that the city MUST share some of the blame. This situation at Ebbets
    Field was not much different than what existed in Cincy at Crosly
    Field, Boston with Fenway, Pittsburgh with Forbes Field and Chicago
    with Wrigly Field. Why didn't the Reds, Cubs, Pirates or Red Sox make
    the jump West? 
    
    O'Malley was still making money but he knew that the cost of baseball
    was rising. He was also in competition in New York for media $$ with
    the Giants and Yankees. Stoneham had no real complaints with the Polo
    Grounds - that place held nearly 15K more than Ebbets Field. O'Malley
    desperately tried to manuever to keep the Dodgers in Brooklyn. Of
    course there was some greed but I can't, in my heart, believe he
    conspired to move Da Bums for years prior to 1958. 
    
    I think O'Malley's big mistake was not going public on his dealings
    sooner. I firmly believe the good folks of Brooklyn would have agreed
    to fund a bond through taxes to build a replacement to Ebbets Field.
    
    New York's consolation prize to Giant and Dodger fans was to
    incorporate Dodger Blue and Giant Orange into the expansion Mets'
    uniforms.
    
    Bottom line is that the Dodgers move was the most complex of any
    franchise move in sports history. Clearly the Braves were a bust in
    Boston and the Browns were going nowhere in St. Louis. The Athletics
    were running second to the Phillies in Philadelphia. The only other
    possible move that even compares to the Dodgers move was the Braves
    move from Milwaukee. But there wasn't the tradition involved and the
    community roots weren't nearly as deep in Milwaukee was they were in
    Brooklyn.
    
    I have heard it reported that evebn today, Brooklyn lobbies for an
    expansion franchise. And Brooklyn continues a committe to void the move
    and move Da Bums back to their borough.
    
    BTW - How did the Dodgers get their name?
    
    Rich
    
3.918Re-write historySALES::THILLThu Apr 09 1992 14:0343
    
    The Dodgers original name from the 1880s was the bridegrooms because
    several players ended up getting married in one year. Later they were 
    known as the "Trolley Dodgers" since apparently it was a major feat to 
    cross a street in those days. Eventually the name was shortened. 
    
    A lot of my previous note is from "Bums" (forget the author), and stories 
    from my father and uncles, etc. which is as objective as it can be :-)  
    Funny you should mention the Reds, Phillies, Pirates, etc. After the 
    Dodgers and Giants left and before expansion was official, NY groups tried 
    to lure one of those NL teams. Now that would have been just as much (if 
    not more) of an injustice to one of those cities. 
    
    True, the city's mistake was not realizing O'Malley wasn't bluffing
    when he was talking about moving. He suggested playing all the WS game
    at Yankee Stadium in 1956 because it was bigger, even if the Dodgers
    may have had a home park advantage at Ebbets Field. The Polo Grounds 
    was perhaps in a little better shape than Ebbets, since the Mets played
    there before Shea was built. Even though it held 55,000, there's no 
    question that it was also on it's way out. If you think sections 5-10 at
    Fenway are bad, most of the park was like that. Also, the PG was in the
    middle of Harlem at 155th st & 8th Ave. Granted, it was nothing like
    any inner city neighborhood is now, but you can imagine the anxiety
    that suburban Giants fans in the '50s had about leaving their cars parked 
    there for a night game. 
    
    TV was also becoming more the norm, and believe it or not, teams used
    to televise home games. Away games were more of a hassle because of the
    video technology. The videotape replay wasn't even invented until the
    early '60s. Spend money, drive in to the city, fight traffic, search for 
    a parking space, possibly get your car damaged/stolen or watch the
    game on TV...For a lot of folks it was a no-brainer.
    
    Branch Rickey was involved in a proposal to make the Pacific Caost
    League the 3rd major league. In a lot of ways it wasn't a bad idea,
    since most of those cities are in the majors now. There was also the
    Contenental League, which never got off the ground. Even still,
    O'Malley could have pulled a Calvin Griffith and got his team in LA,
    (names the Angels after the PCL team) but there would have been a "new" 
    Brooklyn Dodgers (the Mets in reality). The team would have been a lot
    more successful than any version of the Worshinen Senators.   
    
    Tom
3.919FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Apr 09 1992 14:1047
    The Dodgers got their name from dodging the trolleys in Brooklyn and in
    fact were once called the Trolley Dodgers.  They had several other
    names (Superbas was one) but Dodgers was the one that really stuck.
    
    Brooklyn-born author Pete Hamill once called Walter O'Malley one of the
    3 most evil men in the history of the world, along with Adolf Hitler
    and someone else.  I once believed that too, until I read the book.
    
    Brooklyn was changing.  The park was hard to get to and that was the
    time of the mass exodus to the suburbs that made it necessary for a lot
    of the long-time Dodger fans to drive to the game.  On top of that - no
    parking.  Ebbets Field was small and hard to expand.  Clearly, a new
    stadium was needed.
    
    To hear the Dodger fans tell it, O'Malley pushed and pushed the city
    with more and more demands that the city couldn't meet.  To read the
    book, you learn that O'Malley's demands weren't all that heavy and the
    chance to build the stadium got hung up in a political power struggle. 
    Robert Moses, who was the person responsible for building most of the
    public works in the NYC area, was as much to blame as anyone.  O'Malley
    probably could have built the new facility because he paid for Dodger
    Stadium - but NYC would have had to have given him some land to do it.
    
    Part of what made O'Malley look so bad is that he got an incredible
    sweetheart deal from the City of Los Angeles.  He was essentially given
    the land that Dodger Stadium sits on - 100 or so prime acres in
    downtown Los Angeles isn't cheap now and wasn't cheap then.  A similar
    deal, though not as lucrative, was what lured the Giants west as well.
    
    I don't think NYC could have continued to support 3 teams for too much
    longer.  One of them would have had to have moved, probably the Giants. 
    Both teams had a lot in common - running down ballparks and slowly
    declining neighborhoods.  In the case of the Dodgers, it was also a
    hard-to-get-to ballpark.  The Polo Grounds was more run down than Ebbets
    Field.  Yankee Stadium was in good shape and the neighborhood hadn't really
    started its decline - Yankee and Football Giant players continued to
    live on the Grand Concourse in the Bronx until the mid-sixties.  The
    Giants also had the worst ownership and management of the three teams.
    
    It wasn't until New York City realized what it had lost and saw the
    need to build Shea Stadium that anything happened.  It was essentially
    driven by 1 man - William Shea - who had the vision to cut through the
    politics and get it done.  It's a shame he couldn't have done so 10
    years earlier because the Dodgers might still be in the NYC area - but
    probably not in Brooklyn.
    
    John
3.920RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Apr 09 1992 14:4426
    All cities have changed. Yet a proud sports tradition and innovative
    owenership can act as a catalyst to bolster neighborhoods.
    
    Chicago is trying to revamp the South Side with the New Commisky Park.
    Baltimore's Camden Yards is part of an overall urban renewel scheme.
    
    There would have been land available in Brooklyn convenient for fans to
    access. Along the Belt Parkway, Van Wyke Expressway or near JFK
    airport. A new home for the Dodgers could have been used as a
    centerpiece for revitalization.
    
    As far as Shea goes, let's not lose sight of the fact that it was built
    during the scramble to get ready for the 1964 World's Fair. The entire
    area around it, in Flushing Meadows, was undergoing massive changes.
    The Grand Central Parkway, for example had lanes added, new ramps, etc.
    The stadium's construction coincided with the feverish plans to be
    ready for the fair. So, Mr Shea had a lot of red tape cut FOR him by
    Fair organizers.
    
    Ah, what might have been. Had the borough of Brooklyn, the city of New
    York and Walter O'Malley really worked together, perhaps the bums would
    still be there and I would have a New York team I could actually root
    for. 
    
    Rich
    
3.921ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 09 1992 17:0713
    There are still occasional stories about out of towners being in
    Brooklyn and asking for directions to where Ebbets Field was and being
    told we do not talk about the Dodgers in this town anymore.
    
    No question that the Dodgers commanded a loyalty that the Giants never
    did. The Yankees were winning so their fan base was steady all along.
    If any one team would have had to have moved it would have been the
    Giants. In one sense it is good that when one left the other left.
    Somehow it is hard to imagine a real Dodgers/Giants rivalry if they
    played on opposite coasts.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.922CTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSThu Apr 09 1992 17:168
    I read that when Carl Yastrzemski was thinking of joining pro
    while he was in college ( at ND no less!) his dad told him to look
    to the Red Sox that because with the Dodgers gone, the only team
    left that had that *certain* duende-type relationship with 
    the city and fans was the Bosox.
    
    MikeL
    
3.923Baseball in CA was inevitable, and O'Malley seized the momentNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 09 1992 17:1612
        
    At the very least, as opposed to some of the other moves, the Dodgers
    have established their own very strong tradition in Los Angeles.  As
    much as the Dodgers may have been loved in Brooklyn, attendance at
    Ebbets was not off the scale even in the good years and in the down 
    periods was downright disappointing.  I guess depending on how you 
    look at it, O'Malley was a despicable wretch or a brilliant genius.  
    Make no mistake, though, from a business point of view, O'Malley and 
    the entire Dodger organization have had no equal...
    
    glenn
    
3.924RIP Fttzy!SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesThu Apr 09 1992 17:475
>    left that had that *certain* duende-type relationship with 
                                  ^^^^^^
      Another fan of Ray Fitzgerald!!? He was my all-time favorite sportswriter.
     I have his book, "Champions Remembered". Great stuff!
                                       Denny 8^)
3.925Gag!SHALOT::MEDVIDit's just the way i smile, you saidThu Apr 09 1992 17:499
    Fer crissakes!  You guys get on Bob Hunt (et. al.) for the endless
    Dean-o-rama rathole and then proceed to enter a billion notes about a
    team that has been gone for 35 years!  Makes the Wilt vs Russ debate
    look springtime fresh!
    
    Hey, it happened to New York and anything bad that happens to New York
    and New Yorkers makes the rest of the country smile.
    
    	--dan'l
3.926:-)SHALOT::HUNTRoss Is My HossThu Apr 09 1992 17:594
 So whaddya'all think ???   Should Miller Huggins have pinch-hit for Tony
 Lazzeri in Game 7 of the '26 Series ???
 
 Bob Hunt
3.927RUGBY1::wayPhilosophize with him, TedThu Apr 09 1992 18:0024
Disagree Dan'l....


The Dodgers leaving Brooklyn was, IMO, one of the greatest sports tragedies.

Baseball in that era had a character, a fullness, a true Americana.  That
shows like "When It Was A Game" and books like "Shoeless Joe" are written
is a testament to that.


Boston/Fenway is probably one of the few teams that still retain that 
character, with their old park and stuff like that....


And besides, the Dodgers were a part of one of the most exciting baseball
moments ever:

	The Giants win the pennant, the Giants win the pennant, the Giants....



8^)

'Saw
3.928ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 09 1992 18:206
    re: .926 was that game 6 or 7. I know it was the 8th inning.
    
    Now how was the last out of that series made??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.929MCIS1::DHAMELIron Mike VS Queen of Mean on PPVThu Apr 09 1992 18:208
    
    Mike,
    
    Yaz only *attended* Notre Dame to kill time.  When he got serious about
    his education, he earned his degree at Merrimack. 8^)
    
    Dickstah
    
3.930HAHA 'Saw, THE GIANTS WIN THE PENNANTCTHQ3::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSThu Apr 09 1992 18:2715
    Ah, Bob Hunt, .926,
    Tell ya after April 17. 8^)
    
    Denny,
    Actually even though I liked Ray Fitzgerald, LOVED George Frazier
    ( who made duende duende)
    
    Dickstah,
    Only took Yaz 10 yrs to get his MerryMac degree. He left ND 'cuz they
    asked him how to spell his name and he couldn't.  8^)
    
    MikeL
    
    
    
3.931AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhThu Apr 09 1992 18:365
    	Hey MikeL, George Frazier was a mediocre relief pitcher for
    the New York Yankees who lost three games in the '81 World Series.
    How did he make duende duende?  8^)
    
    				/Don
3.932RDOVAX::BRAKEThu Apr 09 1992 18:5134
    The Dodgers would have been a hit no matter where they went - or if
    they had stayed. Remember, when they started in LA they had Koufax and
    Drysdale, Snider and Reese, Gilliam and Alston. The team came with bona
    fide stars and was an immediate threat to the NL pennant. It was a
    contender in 1957 in Brooklyn. 
    
    It left a strong legacy: Jackie Robinson, Pete Reiser, Preacher Roe,
    Joe Black, Roy Campanella, Carl Furillo..........
    
    In the case of the Athletics, Browns and Braves, they were no threat
    when they first moved. 'Course the Braves were building but, in 1953
    they weren't a real threat.
    
    Imagine how bad those Brooklyn fans felt. They had suffered for decades
    and now they finally had a team that could contend year in and year
    out. Imagine how New York felt when 2/3 of the greatest CF'ers in
    history went west. 
    
    I agree with 'Saw. The move of the Dodgers is one of the biggest
    baseball stories ever. 
    
    And, Dan'l, I was born in NY and moved to Mass when I was 5. Have
    rooted against the Yankees, Giants, Mets, Jets, Nets, Rangers,
    Islanders, Knicks and St. Johns. I have always felt secretly good when
    NY teams do badly. But Brooklyn wuz different. It personified what
    could be good in baseball. The franchise had an innocense and an appeal
    that few others had.
    
    The Dodgers played in the first night game. They had Red Barber
    broadcasting games. They had the legacy of Larry McFail and Branch
    Rickey. Da Bums wuz an institution.
    
    Rich
    
3.933Can you believe this guy?!ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 09 1992 19:079
    re: .932
    
    Traitor! You should be shot at dawn! The worst part is that you root
    for teams like the Celtics!
    
    only partial :-)
    
    The Crazy (ed) Met
    
3.934And you thought you were just joking, Bob... ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 09 1992 19:0810
    
    > Now how was the last out of that series made??
    
    Babe Ruth, caught stealing at second.  I believe that Lazzeri's famous
    at-bat against G.C. "Pete" Alexander was in the same game, but an
    earlier inning than is usually reported in the re-telling of the 
    legend...
    
    glenn
    
3.935ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Apr 09 1992 19:129
    Bravo Glenn! Lazzeri's K was not in the 9th but in the 8th inning.
    
    Ruth singled with 2 outs in the 9th withy the Cards still up by 1 run.
    
    Lazzeri finally became one of the few players to hit a Grand Slam in
    the WS a few years later (I think 1928).
    
    The crazy Met
    
3.936'60-'66 Sox sipped big-timeSALES::THILLThu Apr 09 1992 20:4812
    Re Yaz's father telling him the Red Sox were the next closest thing to
    Da Bums... I dunno about this. There was a big thing in last Friday's
    paper about what a total LOSER orgnization the Red Sox had pre-1967. It
    was run by "drunkards and racists..." to quote the Globe. The amazing 
    thing about it is that one year turned the whole franchise around and 
    the Sox have been contenders almost every season since then.  
    
    They may have been the only game in town after the Braves left, but they
    weren't much to write home about, even WITH Ted Williams & Jackie
    Jensen. After they retired the team was even worse.
    
    Tom
3.937One of the few times the Sox got the better of the YanksNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Apr 09 1992 21:1630
    > Re Yaz's father telling him the Red Sox were the next closest thing to
    > Da Bums... I dunno about this. There was a big thing in last Friday's
    > paper about what a total LOSER orgnization the Red Sox had pre-1967. It
    > was run by "drunkards and racists..." to quote the Globe. The amazing 
    > thing about it is that one year turned the whole franchise around and 
    > the Sox have been contenders almost every season since then.  
    
    Lest anyone think that Yaz joined the Red Sox simply because he was
    overwhelmed by the Yawkey tradition, don't forget that a certain matter
    of $100,000 had something to do with it.  Yaz was a bigtime bonus baby,
    and only the Yankees and the free-spending Yawkey were in the bidding.
    I've heard another story where the Yankee scout came to the Yaz
    household and Carl Sr. wrote the magic six-digit figure on an envelope 
    and slid it across the table.  The scout said that it was way too much 
    and the Yankees wouldn't pay it, that wasn't the Yankee way, that young 
    Carl should just be proud to play with the mighty pinstripers, etc., 
    and then got up to leave.  Yaz' dad responded that if the scout left 
    the house now his son would never play for the Yankees.  The scout left 
    but later on relented, but Carl Sr. kept his word.
    
    The moral to all of this: Yaz' dad tells a lot of stories, apparently...
    
    Seriously, though, the Red Sox really weren't in that bad a shape until
    around the time Williams retired, and that was after Yaz signed on. 
    They weren't perennial contenders, but they were generally a winning
    team with a strong fan following.
    
    glenn
    
3.938made for good copy anyway.CTHQ2::LEARYBobHunt,David Copperfield of ::SPORTSMon Apr 13 1992 13:431
    
3.939Return to TraditionRDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 13:4518
    Saw some of the Cubs/Cardinals game on Saturday. Noticed that the
    Cardinals are using the blue caps that they used back in the 60's and
    50's. Since I saw their first game at home where they wore red caps,
    this must be their special road stuff.
    
    Lesse, the Red Sox got rid of their ridiculous pullover tops and went
    back to the traditional uniform around 1980, the Phillies have their
    old uniforms back. The Cubs went back to the style they had in the 50's
    (for the most part), The Cardinals are wearing the style they used on
    the road from years ago, Camden Yards is a beautiful baseball park,
    plans are for another asymetrical park being built for the Texas
    Rangers.........Will the next change be sleeveless tops for the Pirates
    and going back mto calling the Reds the Redlegs?
    
    Ah, tradition, I love it.
    
    Rich
    
3.940LUNER::BROOKSRIP Isaac Asimov : 1920-1992Mon Apr 13 1992 14:066
    Well, the A's like to be officially known as the Athletics (note that
    is on their home jerseys), so the Reds might do it. I'd love to see the
    sleeveless jersey come back (I bet the players will love it in July
    when they play the Cards !) - but I hope we don't see everyone go
    generic on us ... all white and gray and pinstripe, as has been the
    trend lately.
3.941ROYALT::ASHEThought I lobster, but now I flounder...Mon Apr 13 1992 19:493
    Bring back Houston's mustard and catchup striped uni's!!!z
    
    
3.942RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 20:2227
    Nah, the days of softball unis in the majors is over. The White Sox are
    now in respectable uniforms. So are the Padres. 
    
    Now we have to work on getting the Reds, Pirates, Indians and Athletics
    into the sleeveless tops.
    
    And getting the Giants to have "GIANTS" written in block letters across
    the front.
    
    And getting the Mets to have "NEW YORK written in block letters across
    the front of the road uniforms and, also, doing away with the verticle
    stripes going down the sides of their uniforms.
    
    Doing something with the Orioles. The hats are now OK but the home
    jerseys still look like someone couldn't make up their mind - sort of
    like the White Sox unis of 3 years ago.
    
    Getting the Tigers to wear belts on their away uniforms.
    
    Doing away with the Royals blue away colors.
    
    Can anything be done for the Expos hats?
    
    Getting the Brewers to do something about their silly logo.
    
    Rich
    
3.943SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Apr 13 1992 20:263
       Baseball won't be baseball until they at least do away with
    phony-turf!
                                       Denny
3.944re:.943 - agreed, but add inACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Apr 13 1992 20:285
    And it also won;t be baseball until they get rid of the DH aka the
    Designated Gimmick.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.945SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Apr 13 1992 20:343
       You're right Craze, but it still ain't as bad as playin' on a pool
    table!
                                    Denny
3.946Expos old logo was clever but dumbSHALOT::MEDVIDNew Dream Date LogMon Apr 13 1992 20:375
    What's wrong with the Expos hats?  You do realize they changed them
    this year, don't you.  Dark blue with a dark red M.  Pretty nice.  In
    fact, the whole uniform changed and looks a lot better.
    
    	--dan'l
3.947SCHOOL::RIEUSupport DCU Petition CandidatesMon Apr 13 1992 20:403
       What was the name of the team in Montreal before 'Expos'? I can't
    remember, this isn't a trick question.
                                       Denny
3.948FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Apr 13 1992 20:415
    Montreal Royals, farm team of the Brooklyn Dodgers.  Jackie Robinson
    and Roy Campanella played there, after playing for Walter Alston at
    their Nashua, NH farm team.
    
    Ninj
3.949More ...SHALOT::HUNTHappy Happy, Joy JoyMon Apr 13 1992 20:4212
 I believe the Expos kept the same bleu, blanc et rouge "M" symbol but got
 rid of the tri-color hats in favor of solid dark blue.
 
 I like all the uniform changes so far.  It does take an extra split
 second, however, to mentally identify some of the teams when you first see
 them.  
 
 The Expos, in particular.  They were so distinctive before but now you
 have to focus in a little tighter to make sure that's who they are.  Expos
 and Mets road uniforms look awfully alike at first glance.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.950I'd like to find a Pads home jersey from 84 ...LUNER::BROOKSYour mother's an astronaunt ...Mon Apr 13 1992 20:443
    The old Pads uniforms were fine. Changing them to blue and orange to
    run with the Jones' was a big cop-op ... and they stink. I hope they go
    back to the old colors. I liked the A's green and gold from the 70's.
3.951RDOVAX::BRAKEMon Apr 13 1992 20:469
    Dan'l, haven't seen the Expo unis this year. If they deep 6'd the
    multi-color hat, I think it's an improvement.
    
    Speaking of the Expos, have they fixed Olympic Stadium? Remember last
    year they had to play a bunch of home games in September away because
    of falling chunks of concrete?
    
    Rich
    
3.952All kinda confused this AprilSHALOT::MEDVIDNew Dream Date LogTue Apr 14 1992 13:136
    I do stand corrected.  The Expos did go to a dark blue hat but they
    left the multi-colored ensignia.  The biggest change so far...as far as
    sitting watching a game and saying "who the hell is that"...are the
    Cards who are wearing dark blue batting helmets.
    
    	--dan'l
3.953FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 14 1992 13:3075
    I had a chance to reread _The Dodgers Move West_ over the last couple
    of days.  If this is a subject you're at all interested in approaching
    objectively, then this is the book to read.  Do not try to get a
    balanced viewpoint from _The Boys of Summer_, _Bums_ or any other book
    about the period since those are 100% from the fan viewpoint and cast
    Walter O'Malley as 100% evil.  He wasn't.  If they want to blame any
    one person, blame Robert Moses.
    
    A lot of the information I mentioned in previous notes is accurate. 
    Attendance at Ebbets Field wasn't great but the Dodgers were still very
    profitable.  Access and parking were big problems, along with the fact
    that Ebbets Field was small and there was no room for expansion.  The
    neighborhood was in a slow state of decline and while a rough crowd to
    begin with, things were getting worse with more blacks at the ballpark. 
    According to observers, the black fan loyalty was to Jackie Robinson
    and not to the team, and this tension combined with the crowded
    conditions of a full house at Ebbets Field made for a potentially
    explosive atmosphere.
    
    After O'Malley took over the Dodgers from Branch Rickey, he saw the
    replacement of Ebbets Field as the top priority of the ballclub.  One
    of the things motiviating him to do so was the move to Milwaukee of the
    Braves, who drew 2,000,000 their first year.  O'Malley was quite
    concerned about whether or not the Dodgers could remain competitive. 
    This concern deepened as the fifties rolled along and the Boys of
    Summer began to age.
    
    O'Malley wanted to build the ballpark himself but needed the city to
    take a plot of land in order for him to do so.  He wanted the land to
    be at the intersection of Atlantic Avenue and Flatbush Avenue in
    Brooklyn, where the Long Island RR terminal was.  He had a scheme that
    a new stadium and a rebuilt railroad station could revitalize the area. 
    Here's where Moses came in.  He was opposed to railroads because he's
    the man who was responsible for the highway network around New York,
    and he wanted people to drive the highways he built and pay the tolls. 
    He was opposed to spectator sports because he believed in active
    recreation.  O'Malley wanted the land condemned for municipal use under
    a broad interpretation of a local statute.  Moses hung to the narrow
    interpretation of the statute, though he wasn't above interpreting it
    broadly when it served his purposes.
    
    Moses did the usual political maneuvering - study committees, the whole
    bit - in order to delay the proposal and frustrate the opposition.  In
    the meantime, New York City had to appropriate the money to do this
    work and approve the project as it slowly moved forward.  Brooklyn,
    although the largest borough in NYC at the time, was relatively
    powerless because while it had a majority of the votes on the
    equivalent of the City Council, was looked upon as a minor part of the
    city.  So, no one was really interested in helping Brooklyn out.
    
    These reasons, moreso than Walter O'Malley, are the reasons the Dodgers
    moved out.  Los Angeles saw this and approached him.  They took the
    land at Chavez Ravine and packaged it up for him.  O'Malley sold Ebbets
    Field and leased it back, had the Dodgers play some games in Roosevelt
    Stadium in Jersey City and gave New York City every chance to make a
    deal with him.  They wouldn't.  In fairness, about the time of the move
    West, the idea for Shea Stadium came about (Moses backed this one
    because not only would it be publicly financed but would be the
    centerpiece of the big park he hoped to build at Flushing Meadow) but
    O'Malley by then was committed to either keeping the Dodgers in
    Brooklyn or moving them west to Los Angeles.
    
    Even the move to Los Angeles was dicey because there were several court
    suits challenging the validity of the deal with the Dodgers and it
    actually went to a public referendum that passed by a very narrow
    margin.  O'Malley really gambled with the move to Los Angeles, moreso
    than Horace Stoneham did with the Giants move to San Francisco - it's
    hard to believe now, to look at Candlestick Park and the rejections of
    the new stadium in San Francisco, but San Francisco wanted the Giants
    more overall than Los Angeles wanted the Dodgers and made it very easy
    for the Giants to move there.  It was really a struggle for the Dodgers
    to get the land and get established - if that had fallen through, who
    knows what would have happened?
    
    John
3.954RDOVAX::BRAKETue Apr 14 1992 14:065
    John, thanks so much for that note. I'm going to the library tonight to
    get the book.
    
    Rich
    
3.955Book?7389::FARLEYSon,you can make hundreds o'dollars...Tue Apr 14 1992 15:0714
    Rich,
    
    You may want to re-think that decision.
    
    
    
    I've heard there are no pictures in the book!
    
    many ;^)
    
    I remain,
    Zinggggggg,
    Kev
    
3.956RDOVAX::BRAKETue Apr 14 1992 15:106
    What, no pictures????
    
    I don't need no steeeeenking pictures!!!!!
    
    Rich
    
3.957FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 14 1992 15:2853
    Kev, there are pictures in the book.
    
    A few other notes about the move - New York based its decision to not
    help the Dodgers and Los Angeles based its decision to help the Dodgers
    on differing interpretations of the same law - namely, is helping a
    sports franchise in the public interest or not.  New York felt not, Los
    Angeles thought it did.  Even at that, the original City Council
    decision in Los Angeles was overturned by the Superior Court but then
    upheld in both the California Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court.
    
    As I finished the book, it became clearer that what O'Malley really
    needed was government help in acquiring the land.  If the government
    takes land by eminent domain, they pay the owners fair market value. 
    If an entrepreneur wants to buy land it becomes more and more expensive
    to do so (which is why Disney's move to Florida was kept secret for so
    long and why the Red Sox, if they are putting together a parcel of land
    as I suspect they are, are doing so quietly).  New York wasn't willing
    to do that for two reasons - O'Malley wanted to own the facility and
    land outright where New York would have preferred a landlord-tenant
    relationship, and the Dodgers were seen as a purely Brooklyn franchise
    that weren't identified as New York City-wide (unlike the Yankees and
    to a lesser extent, the Giants) so the O'Malley proposal was seen as
    benefitting only O'Malley and Brooklyn.  Well, it did benefit O'Malley
    but that's business - the loss of the Dodgers probably cost Brooklyn
    more than O'Malley would have made.
    
    O'Malley also didn't play New York vs Los Angeles in an attempt to get
    the best deal he could, despite the deep held thoughts and emotions of
    those from Brooklyn.  He didn't pursue Los Angeles - Los Angeles came
    to him.  They took the land under eminent domain and he bought it for
    less than he would have to if he'd done it himself, they helped with
    the access but even at that there were lots of obstacles.
    
    The book concludes that the move was justified.  Ebbets Field was going
    to have to be abandoned sooner or later and had Shea Stadium been a
    couple of years further ahead, either the Dodgers or Giants would have
    ended up there, with no team in Brooklyn in either case since building
    a new ballpark in Brooklyn just wasn't going to happen.  From a civic
    viewpoint it was justified - it was just impossible then and even more
    impossible now for a sports facility to be built without any government
    help whatsoever - be it tax breaks, access, help in assembling the
    land, whatever.  New York didn't see the Giants and Dodgers (and since
    then, the football Giants and Jets) as civic assets - Los Angeles and
    San Francisco did.  A city has no right to complain about the loss of a
    team as a civic asset unless it's willing to put its money where its
    mouth is.
    
    The Dodgers were the foundation of the Brooklyn community and that can
    never be forgiven by the folks in Brooklyn, nor can the reasons behind
    the move be justified in any way for any reason, no matter how right
    the move was.  This passion blurs the real issues.
    
    John
3.958Case in point ...SCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubTue Apr 14 1992 15:5815
3.959FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 14 1992 16:0315
    And that's why I fully expect to see the Patriots somewhere other than
    around here at some point in the future.  Boston and Massachusetts
    politicians don't have the vision to see what a place like the
    Metrodome has done for Minneapolis, and worry more about who's going to
    benefit from building such a facility (ie, who's going to get the cushy
    no-show job).
    
    Unlike a civic asset such as a museum, a sports franchise has the
    freedom to move.  Unlike the arts, which are made up of lots of small
    businesses (theatre groups, dance companies and so forth), their
    economic impact is felt in the aggregate and the loss of one or two
    groups doesn't have a big impact.  The loss of a sports team has a big,
    big impact.
    
    John
3.960AXIS::ROBICHAUDCokeIsTheRealThing-UhHuhTue Apr 14 1992 17:034
    	Thanks JohnH.  It was really Moses who led the Dodgers to the
    promised land.
    
    				/Don
3.961RDOVAX::BRAKETue Apr 14 1992 18:0012
    You are sadly correct, John, on your assesment of the Patriots' chances
    of staying in Massachusetts. Look how the city has treated attempts for
    a new Boston Garden? They haven't got a clue what a state of the art
    25,000 seat facility could mean to the metro area. 
    
    We hear hacks tell us, "Why should the taxpayer shell out dough for
    sports teams?" They are too short-sighted to realize that they could
    reap millions in revenue from activities that avoid Boston like the
    plague now because of a lack of a decent arena.
    
    Rich
     
3.962I doubt Boston will ever learnACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Apr 14 1992 18:0414
    re: .961
    
    The folks who run the Worcester Centrum sure aren't complaining about
    the lousy shape Boston Garden is in. Lets see, Springsteen only played
    the Centrum last time. U2 played both this time but only the Centrum
    last tour, and on and on. Unless a new Boston Garden is built they can
    forget about getting acts like the Stones,Springsteen, NCAA Regionals,
    etc on a regular basis. Madison Square Garden redid a whole portion of
    their space within the last year. The new Paramount (?) Theatre section
    looks real good and is a great venue for smaller event with the Main
    arena a great place for larger indoor events.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.963What about Fenway?RDOVAX::BRAKETue Apr 14 1992 18:136
    And what is the city doing (or the Red Sox) about the inevitable? We
    all know Fenway's days are numbered. Are there any plans for a
    replacement? Locations discussed?
    
    Rich
    
3.964FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 14 1992 18:2630
    In the city's defense, they did help the owners of Boston Garden work
    out a land swap with the Massachusetts General Hospital to assemble the
    parcel of land needed.  They may or may not be giving the owners of the
    Garden tax breaks to develop the land.
    
    In the state's defense, they worked with the developers of the land to
    enable the building to be built on top of a rebuilt MBTA subway and
    train station.  There will also be a parking garage incorporated in.
    
    Neither the state or city was willing/able to use borrowing power to
    get low cost, low interest state or municipal bonds to help the owners
    with financing.  I believe the owners of the Garden will be willing to
    be fully liable for the bonds if the state/city will finance them.  The
    owners are now off pursuing various alternatives for the financing -
    the sale of luxury boxes and talking to Japanese banks about it.
    
    The worst thing the city did was delay in naming the owners of the
    Garden as developers for the project, which would have originally
    included office space and hotels.  Since it was first proposed, the
    real estate market collapsed and made this part of the project
    unfeasible.  The new Garden, if built, will be the only thing built. 
    There will 8 feet between the old building and new building - the lot
    is that tight.
    
    Other than naming a study commission, nothing is happening with
    anything to do with a facility for the Red Sox or Patriots.  A new
    facility for the Patriots is only really feasible if the Red Sox go in
    with them.  The Red Sox will only move if and when they have to.
    
    John
3.965Will I be able to get good Celts' tix in the New Garden? Not.NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Apr 14 1992 18:2628
    On the other hand, I think there's a real problem in this country (and
    maybe Canada, too, as witnessed by the bankrupted Skydome) with sports 
    owners holding out their hands and demanding what amounts to blackmail 
    payments to keep their teams in certain communities.  Once upon a time, 
    while owners might have gotten a good deal on land or certain zoning 
    exceptions to get started, they financed, built, and ran and their own 
    stadiums and generally operated their franchises as private businesses
    without outside intervention.  Now, it's almost a contest to see which 
    communities can show the most "foresight" by gouging their taxpaying 
    constituents the most without evoking a negative response.
    
    I don't see the point to it.  Cities compete against other cities with
    tax dollars for the rights to charge ludicrous luxury box fees and
    increasingly high prices for increasingly scarce tickets (with most
    decent tickets going to more affluent season-ticket holders).  All of
    this supposedly benefits the city by bringing in business and therefore
    more tax revenues, but is it enough to offset the franchise and stadium
    subsidies?  I suspect that these ecomonic benefits to the community are
    greatly exaggerated by the sports moguls and their partners in
    government (and have seen studies cited that say as much, the last time 
    being when the Raiders almost succeeded in hijacking the decaying city 
    of Oakland of a scandalous ransom a couple of years ago), and that the
    benefits go to the very few as opposed to being well-distributed
    amongst the taxpayers...
    
    glenn
       
3.966Left horn or right ???SCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubTue Apr 14 1992 18:3612
Classic definition of a dilemma, isn't it ???   

A city can slash its economic wrists and keep the spoiled brat team or it can 
let it go and risk all kinds of scorn and ridicule ... not to mention voter 
anger in the next election.

Ultimately, you can begin to make a case for publicly-held sports teams a la 
the Green Bay Packers.   Make 'em each do an IPO on the Big Board, sell gobs 
of shares and then appoint some business management types who answer directly 
to the stockholders through a Board of Directors.

Bob Hunt 
3.967PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Apr 14 1992 18:426
3.968Walter O'Malley = Mother Theresa. NOTSALES::THILLTue Apr 14 1992 18:5428
    Interesting, objective note a while back about the Dodgers, Ninj. Passion 
    aside, answers are never as simple as they appear.  
    
    Don't forget that the area where Dodger Stadium now sits was a primarily 
    Hispanic barrio. The city siezed th land by eminent domain, and basically 
    tore down a neighborhood that was perhaps like the old West End in Boston 
    - a "blighted" area to some, but home to others. Of course in those days
    urban community groups - especially minority groups - didn't have the
    grass roots organization to do anything about it. 
    
    The Dodgers played in the LA Coleseum from 1958 to 1961, with Dodger
    Stadium opening in April 1962. The AL's LA Angels played in Wrigley 
    Field home field of the Cubs' PCL farm team by the same name. For a
    while they even played there after Dodger Stadium was open, but later
    moved in as tennants. Now before everyone starts gushing over what a
    wonderful humanitarian Walter O'Malley is, note that the Dodgers were
    charging the Angels for field maintenance when the Angels were on the
    road (and the Dodgers were home). The Dodgers also got ALL the parking 
    and concessions form Angels home games, sorta like the lease the Jets had 
    with the Mets at Shea before they moved to NJ. When the Angels complained, 
    O'Malley told them that, like someone who travels a lot on the job, you 
    still have to pay your whole month's rent/mortgage whether you are there 
    or not. That, combined with a growing suburban population and Disneyland 
    opening, made it all the more reason for the Angels to move when Aneheim 
    Stadium was built in 1965 or so.   
    
    Tom
    
3.969FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 14 1992 18:5837
    The taxpayer should shell out money to help the teams if they see the
    teams as civic assets and recognize the economic benefits they bring to
    an area.  I'll bet a lot of Minnesotans saw the Metrodome as a white
    elephant until they saw all the benefits hosting the Super Bowl and
    Final Four brought to them.  And this doesn't even include the NCAA
    hockey tournament (which wasn't played at the Dome), the Stanley Cup
    finals (ditto) and the World Series (which wasn't planned but which
    just sort of happened).  If it can be sold on that basis, then it will
    work.
    
    Players have become their own worst enemies with their huge salaries. 
    Teams have become their own worst enemies by some of their unreasonable
    demands.  But, if the team will approach the governments looking to
    form a true partnership (as I believe the Patriots are doing) and
    selling the benefits of the collaboration, without making unreasonable
    demands, then it can fly.  This situation as Bob and Glenn referred to
    doesn't give a team the right to play hardball and play one city
    against another to get the Taj Mahal built.
    
    In this state, to give you an example of what I think will happen,
    consider the Mass Convention Center Authority.  This was formed as an
    umbrella over the Hynes Auditorium at the Prudential Center and the
    Boston Common Garage - both owned by the city, both losing tons of
    money.  It was made a state agency but a condition of making it a state
    agency was to give Fran Joyce, longtime aide to Senate President
    Bulger, a lifetime appointment as director.  Well, these are state
    agencies but there are lots of politicians who are either jealous of
    Joyce, angry at Bulger (who runs the State Senate with an iron hand) or
    both; who oppose any help given to the MCCA because of the
    personalities involved.  That's the sort of parochial mindset here in
    Massachusetts that will prevent a creative project like a Metrodome
    from ever happening.  It's a shame because the MCCA, with the right
    resources, can be run well and be a real money-maker for the State.  A
    stadium could do the same thing.
    
    John
                                               
3.970FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Tue Apr 14 1992 19:0727
    Tom,
    
    Actually, the land had previously been seized (well, most of it) by
    eminent domain for a public housing project.  Then, there was something
    that stopped the public housing from being built - and in fact it could
    not be used for public housing for a 30 year period.  The land was
    essentially going to sit idle unless it was put to some other project
    for the public benefit.  The whole legal question hinged on whether or
    not selling it to the Dodgers for a baseball stadium was for the public
    benefit or not.  New York didn't see it that way, Los Angeles did and
    it was upheld in court.
    
    The city, however, got a lot of bad publicity for evicting the last few
    folks living on that land.  Also, they walked away from condemning the
    last few parcels of land so O'Malley had to deal directly with the
    owners, and paid an exceptionally high price for the parcels.  One of
    these parcels was in the middle of the entrance of the parking lot.
    
    O'Malley was no Mother Theresa, that's for sure.  He was a smart
    businessman who bet on taking a big risk and won big.  The point of the
    book is to show that while Brooklynites may have been justified in
    their anger over the Dodgers leaving, their anger was misplaced - they
    should have been angry at Robert Moses, Mayor Robert Wagner, the rest
    of the New York City Government, the borough of Brooklyn and Borough
    President Abe Stark.
    
    John
3.971DCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKETue Apr 14 1992 20:0027
    I can't understand HOW the Celtics, Bruins and Red Sox are nopt
    considered civic assets to the people of Boston. Yet my years of living
    in Mass saw nothing but obstacles being thrown into the path of any
    plan for a new Garden. While modern hotels went up like weeds in the
    '80's, I had to wonder: Who will be occupying all these rooms?
    
    John brings up an excellent example with the Metrodome. Cases can also
    be made for the Hoosier dome. NOT THAT A DOME IS THE ANSWER!!! But a
    modern facility can have a myriad of uses.
    
    Oriole Park at camden Yards cost the Orioles $1.7M to build. I have no
    idea what kind of deal the team made with the city of Baltimore but
    that seems like small potatoes when I consider player salaries.
    Admittedly, Oriole Park is a one sport arena and has limited uses but
    it's success bodes promising for future Red Sox plans.
    
    Bob Hunt also alluded to efforts by Philadelphia. Creative,
    well-thought out plans and a spirit of partnership between teams and
    city are alive in their efforts. This new arena will be able to offer a
    site for major conventions, concerts, ice shows and enough activity to
    keep it busy 75% of the year. Considering the money people spend when
    they attend events in arenas, there is a chance for a bonanza. But, as
    Mac states, plans have to be honest and Massachusetts has a track
    record lately of creating bottomless pits for taxpayer money. 
    
    Rich
    
3.972LUNER::BROOKSI'll put my mouth where the money is!Tue Apr 14 1992 20:2412
    re Glenn W
    
    (Applause !!!!!)
    
    Very well put. Which made it all the sweeter when the city of Oakland
    told Al Davis to take his demands and stick 'em when the sun didn't
    shine. And Mayor Lionel Wilson almost got hooted out of town for
    falling for the blackmail.
    
    One would hope that other cities will wake up and smell the coffee.
    
    Doc
3.973More ...SHALOT::HUNTHappy Happy, Joy JoyTue Apr 14 1992 20:2910
3.974LUNER::BROOKSI'll put my mouth where the money is!Tue Apr 14 1992 20:436
    Yeah Bob, but Al tried to 'greenmail' Oakland like he did Irwindale
    (talk about stupid), and Wilson was ready to bite. Fortunately, the
    people woke up and stopped the madness.
    
    I think an expansion team will come cheaper for the city than getting
    the Raiders back would have.
3.975Philadelphia Story?SALES::THILLWed Apr 15 1992 15:1219
    Bob Hunt, maybe you can explain something about the Philadelphia
    situation. From what I heard, the Eagles' Leonard Tose threatened a
    move to Phoenix unless the city re-negotiated his lease at the Vet in
    a much more favorable way. The city gave in, so he stayed. I heard
    rumblings about someone building a new arena across the river in Camden
    NJ for the Flyers and Sixers. Did the city agree to replace the
    Spectrum? The Spectrum isn't that old (25 years?) so it's not as if it
    was the Boston Garden or Chicago Stadium. Is the "problem" with the
    spectrum that it doesn't have enough Luxury boxes?  It seems
    renovations could be done to add them a lot easier and cheaper than
    building a new arena. 
    
    I guess what gets me is owners taking advantage of the popular
    sentiment. If whoever the pols responsible for letting the Eagles go had 
    let them, they might as well forget about re-election. Tose knew this
    and held the gun to the city. Sure, sports teams do mean a lot to a
    community, but where do you draw the line?
    
    Tom
3.976More ...SHALOT::HUNTHappy Happy, Joy JoyWed Apr 15 1992 15:5042
3.977Say Walt ? Remember : "The roof ... the roof is on ire ..."EARRTH::BROOKSI'll put my mouth where the money is!Wed Apr 15 1992 18:379
    Bob, stop exaggerating ! The C-4 was an 'entry device' !
    
    Distortionist !
    
    
              
    :-)
    
    Doc
3.978FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Apr 16 1992 16:137
    Rich, the politicians in the Boston area look at the sports teams as
    civic assets to be milked for their own benefit:  "Give me four
    tickets."  "Give my idiot cousin a job."  "Buy beer from my brother's
    distributorship."  That kind of civic asset they understand perfectly
    well.
    
    John
3.979Right on the Nose, JohnDCOPST::POOLQ::BRAKEThu Apr 16 1992 17:266
    yeah, John, I hear you. 
    
    Get ya Bulger Beah Heah!
    
    Rich
    
3.980CELTIK::JACOBA Plotcher, hard luck Your LordshipThu Apr 16 1992 19:479
    
    civic assets to be milked for their own benefit:  "Give me four
    tickets."                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^
    ^^^^^^^^^
    
    Or Vouchers, maybe???????
    
    JaKe
    
3.981Not enough ballsSHALOT::MEDVIDWho's got segmented eyes?Mon May 04 1992 17:2614
    Pam Postema, the only female ump in the majors, has a book out called
    "You Have To Have Balls To Make It In This League."  It details her 13
    years as an ump and how she never was able to make it to the majors,
    supposedly because of her sex.
    
    I saw Postema ump her first major league game in Kissimmee, Florida
    back in '88.  It was a spring training game between the Pirates and the
    Astros.  It became a famous game not only because it was the first one
    ever umped by a female, but also because of what Bob Knepper said after
    the game: women are "in a role of submission to men."
    
    She was fired a month after her strongest advocate Bart Giamatti died.
    
    	--dan'l
3.982GRANPA::DFAUSTNetworkin' the USA '92 TourTue May 05 1992 01:425
    I heard her on a Philly radio station last week, and she pretty much
    made a fool of herself. She was asked about her chapter about the
    current Phils 3rd base coach, Larry Bowa. She really piled it on him.
    They then had Bowa come on the line, refuting most of what she said.
    Pretty weak...... 
3.983ROYALT::ASHETue May 05 1992 02:402
    Kirk Gibson has been released...
    
3.984Sooooooooweeeeeeee!!!SHALOT::MEDVIDi can't lick that farFri May 08 1992 14:315
    Three women are suing Daryl Strawberry for a few million each in a
    slander case.  They claim Strawberry said they were "pigs."
    
    	--dan'l
    
3.985JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed May 27 1992 21:155
    Giants over Cubs this afternoon 6-2...Mike Felder's bases loaded triple
    in the 9th the big blow.
    
    
    py
3.986Dumb FansSHALOT::MEDVIDthe strain of smilingWed Jun 24 1992 13:295
    Barry Bonds and Tony Gwynn lead the All-Star voting for the NL
    outfield.  1992 no-stars Bonilla and Strawberry are in line for the
    third position.  
    
    	--dan'l
3.987CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Jun 24 1992 13:4711
Dan'l -

While Bonilla isn't have a super season, he does have 41 ribbys.  Despite
criticisms, he'll drive in over 100 runs again this year.  He's consistent,
that's for sure.

I don't think he should start,  but he's a better pick than Darryl...


JD

3.988What did he say about Hohn's mother anywaySHALOT::MEDVIDSave a baboon, donate YOUR liverMon Jul 06 1992 18:4411
    In Atlanta yesterday, the homeplate ump tossed Terry Pendleton and then
    Bobby Cox.  Then he proceeded to get a member of security, point out a
    guy in the stands, and have him kicked out.  Now, I've seen ushers and
    security oust fans for infractions, but I've never seen an ump go out
    of his way to pinpoint someone and get him thrown out.
    
    Anyone know what the guy did to warrant such punishment?  I can see it
    being consistent with league rules if he interfered with play, but
    other than that...
    
    	--dan'l
3.989Sizzling hot !!!SCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubMon Jul 06 1992 19:2614
3.990roolling!!ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Jul 06 1992 19:313
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.991WGN gets more late night games, TBS lessSHALOT::MEDVIDSave a baboon, donate YOUR liverMon Jul 06 1992 22:3210
    Had to stop eating dinner and enter what I just heard on the local
    news:
    
    Starting next season, the Reds and Braves move to the NL East and the
    Cubs and Cardinals move to the NL West.
    
    This totally shocks me.  I didn't even know Vincent was considering
    this.
    
    	--dan'l
3.992ROYALT::ASHEDon't leave me hangin, I wanna be ganginMon Jul 06 1992 22:414
    It was supposed to be with Chicago's and St. Louis' consent.
    StL. said yes.  Cubs said no for the reason you mentioned.
    Vincent was forced to force the issue.
    
3.993Only makes sense...BSS::JCOTANCHMon Jul 06 1992 22:5816
    I read that Vincent could use some 'best interest of baseball' rule to force
    the issue, which is obviously what he did.  If the NL goes to a 13-12
    schedule, which they probably will at this point, it really won't
    matter to the Cubs (or anyone else) that much because everyone's
    schedule will be about the same regardless of which divison a team is
    in.  
    
    And I also recall reading a while back where some of the current NL
    West teams were willing to play more day/early evening games against
    the Cubs to accomodate their WGN telecasts.
    
    Funny thing is, the NL will have the same problem in the next year or two 
    if the Giants end up moving to St. Pete.
    
    
    Joe
3.994PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 07 1992 13:447
    This change will coincide with the addition of the expansion
    franchises.  The Colorado Rockies will play in the NL West, while the
    Florida Marlins will play in the NL East.
    
    The manager of the Mets was interviewed about the change and he's upset
    that the top 2 teams in the NL will be coming into the East division. 
    Boo Hoo.
3.995ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Jul 07 1992 14:568
    My first reaction was damn! the 2 top NL West teams are moving to the
    NL East. Second reaction was that teams strengths change year by year,
    and I would much rather not have the type of schedule that the AL has
    where a team plays more games outside of its division. Poor Cubbie,
    they have a TV problem, tough!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.996It was certainly easier with 12 teamsBSS::JCOTANCHTue Jul 07 1992 15:1913
>    and I would much rather not have the type of schedule that the AL has
>    where a team plays more games outside of its division. 
    
    That 13-12 format that the AL uses is probably what the NL will go
    with; it will help ease the pain for the Cubs.  
    
    The other possibilities they're considering are a 20-6 format, but
    that's a little too unbalanced and I doubt that is what the NL will
    use.  Another one under consideration is a 16-9 format with 3 swing
    games that would alternate each year.
    
    
    Joe
3.997Guess the Mets are going to have to spend more moneyAXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateTue Jul 07 1992 15:291
    
3.998ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Jul 07 1992 15:416
    Why realign if they use a balanced schedule?? Makes ZERO sense for
    Vincent to antagonize all these folks if the schedule becomes the sam
    abomination that the AL uses.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.999ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Jul 07 1992 15:4718
    re: Cubs
    
    Currently the Cubs play 6 games in each of the West Coast cities for a
    total of 18 games. Assume that at least 4 of those games are Sat/Sun
    games. That leaves 14 potential weekday night games. In a 20-6 schedule
    Cubs might even play 8 Sat/Sun games on the West Coast, but for
    arguments sake lets take the minimum.
    
    With a 20-6 schedule, Cubs would now play 30 games on the West Coast.
    Likelihood is that with 3 10 game West Coast swings Cubs would play 
    8-10 Sat/Sun games. That leaves 20-22 potential West Coast night games.
    Chicago is 2 hours ahead of LA/SF/SD. A 6, 6:30, or 7PM start for just a
    few games (2 in each city) means that the Cubs end up with about as
    many late (9:30PM) starts as they have now. In other words this whole
    TV thing is workable.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1000FDCV07::KINGTue Jul 07 1992 16:003
    It's about time!!!!
    
    REK
3.1001George is going to make sure of that...CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentTue Jul 07 1992 16:526
 9:30 is too late a finish for WGN. They have a highly watched 9:00 news
 program that they don't want to screw with....

 Vincent's just trying to make as many chances as possible before they kick
 his butt out...
3.1002QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Tue Jul 07 1992 19:221
      It makes no diff!
3.1003PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 08 1992 13:542
    The Cubs are filing suit against Vincent today in order to remain in
    the NL East.
3.1004going legalHBAHBA::HAASWTOE RadioWed Jul 08 1992 13:5710
This should be interesting.

The league charter says the commish can't force a team to move without
its permission. It also says a team can't sue the commish. So I guess
it's time for the lawyers to come outta the wood work.

Who knows, maybe corporate sponsors will line up on one side or the
other ;-)

TTom
3.1005FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jul 08 1992 14:305
    Yes, but the Commissioner has the right to do as he sees fit for the
    "good of the game."  My opinion is that this suit will be tossed as
    being totally frivolous.
    
    John
3.1006back to $$$sHBAHBA::HAASWTOE RadioWed Jul 08 1992 14:479
The Cubs could make a fairly legitimate case that this moves costs them
dollars in terms of decrease value of their TV package. By moving to the
west a lot of their games will cut into the prime time of WGN, the cable
station that shows the games. 

A possible settlement could be some compensation, if the Cubs start
looking like they have a case for damages.

TTom
3.1007The Cubs are already in a different time zonePATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 08 1992 14:493
    TTom, most of their games are already in TV primetime and many of the
    West coast clubs have already agreed to move up some starts so that the
    games don't last past midnight east coast time.
3.1008convincedHBAHBA::HAASWTOE RadioWed Jul 08 1992 14:545
Mac,

Based on what you've stated, put me in the Ninj camp: it's bogus.

TTom
3.1009FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jul 08 1992 15:1015
    Based on two things - the clause in baseball's constitution prohibiting
    the Commish from being sued and the Commish's power to act in the best
    interests of the game - the suit is bogus.  The good of the game far
    overrides the interests of one team.  I think it even overrides the one
    thing the Cubs have to stand on, that is, the rule stating a team being
    moved must consent to the move.
    
    The Federal Courts (which are the only courts that have jurisdiction
    over something like this) are extremely reluctant to get involved in an
    internal dispute of this type and will almost never overturn something
    that's been a rule of law for a long time (suits brought within the
    last few years of the same type have been tossed as well).
    
    John
                                   
3.1010MOQUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Jul 08 1992 15:208
      I agree,  its bogus and the CUBS should get some puffs to help them
    get over it!
    
      I would think if its over some TV time, that they can figure out a
    solution....
    
    
    	Tim
3.1011BSS::JCOTANCHWed Jul 08 1992 15:5814
    The Cubs actually aren't using the WGN deal as the reason but instead
    saying it will cause 'irreparable injury' to their fans by breaking up
    tradition and some of the the Cubs' big rivalries.  
    
    That's a joke, because divisonal play's only been around since '69 and
    their biggest rival, the Cards, are going West with them.
    
    The Cardinals are mildly complaining about the decision even though
    they voted for it a couple months ago.  Go figure.  I think they're
    just pissed off at the fact the the commissioner went ahead and made
    the decision himself.
    
    
    Joe
3.1012AXIS::ROBICHAUD20YearsLater-IraqgateWed Jul 08 1992 16:1410
    RE: Commish has powers for "good of the game"...
    
    	Makes you wonder why Faye let the Lastros upset the entire National
    League schedule so McMullen could make a few bucks off the Republicans.
    Hey I got an idea.  Since the Mets are whining about having to play
    in a competitive division why not move the Mets into the NL West
    (Cubs will still have them as a rival) and move somebody like the
    Giants in the NL East?
    
    				/Solomon
3.1013QUASER::JACKSONTAAl Bundies feet=Ford Con.Wed Jul 08 1992 16:543
      I think that the eastern teams should stay in the east and western in
    the west.  This seems logical,  but we know how logic can screw
    everything up:-(
3.1014NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Jul 08 1992 17:1912
    Keep in mind that the Cubs (and Braves) were already bent out of shape
    at Vincent because he's made statements that superstation baseball
    telecasts should be scaled back because they hurt the negotiations for 
    national television contracts and subsequently affect league competitive 
    balance.  There's no love lost between Vincent and the Cubs.  It all
    comes back to the issue of the haves and the have nots that he's been
    preaching recently, and the Cubs are one of the haves that don't want
    change... 
    
    glenn
    
3.1015GRANPA::DFAUSTNetworkin' the USA '92 TourWed Jul 08 1992 17:4014
    I think I might be able to support Vincent's position if someone could
    explain to me how this was for the "good of the game." Since divisional
    play started in 1969, the growth of the game has been unmatched in its
    history. It's as though Fay thinks that the NL will go down the tubes
    if the Cubs aren't in the West. A poor judgement on Vincent's part to
    override the NL constitution using the "good of the game" nonsense. The
    entire reason the NL put the clause in about the teams affected needing
    to consent was to prevent this type of thing from happening. Vincent
    had no right to do what he did, whatever the Cubs motives were for
    voting it down. If the Cubs use that approach in court, I don't see how
    they can lose. Vincent went wayyyyyyy overboard.
    
    Dennis
    
3.1016EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Wed Jul 08 1992 18:459
    What ever happened to common sense ? Why in the hell was Atlanta in the
    West anyhow ? Only because Chicago and ???? threatened to block San
    Diego and Montreal's entry into the NL unless the Cubs stayed in the
    East, and the only way for that to happen was for Atlanta to go West.
    
    Maybe Vincent's reasoning was a little flawed, but it was the right
    thing to do.
    
    Doc
3.1017JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasWed Jul 08 1992 18:507
    > What ever happened to common sense ? Why in the hell was Atlanta in the
    > West anyhow ?
    
    Same reason the Falcons are in the NFC West?  :-)
    
    
    py
3.1018All-mighty buckHYDRA::HAUSRATHTime to change the P-NameWed Jul 08 1992 19:4412
    
    The move is going to place the bulk of the top NL teams in the East ..  
    The Cubs will be moving to a division where they stand (at least
    near-term) a much greater chance of finishing on top.  
    
    Cubs management is dead-set against the move, due to monetary issues 
    related to TV revenues.  
    
    I guess I see where the Cubs place their emphasis.. and it ain't on 
    winning.   
    
    /Jeff
3.1019AXIS::ROBICHAUDCubsSay-HellNoWeWontGoWed Jul 08 1992 19:564
    	Scale back the superstations?  They had better not because then
    I would be forced to watch the Red Sox!  8^(
    
    				/Don
3.1020CTHQ2::MCCULLOUGHComing soon: Lindsey's Sister!!Wed Jul 08 1992 20:077
I may be way off here, but did divisional play start when the Braves were in 
Milwalkee?  Hence, it was natural for them to be in the west.

As for the Falcons, that was an expansion thang.  They came into the NFL when
the west didn't have enough teams, hence were placed in the west to even it out.

=Bob=
3.1021It's about $$$, nothing lessSHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightWed Jul 08 1992 20:097
 Amazing how the Cubs are all of a sudden concerned with loss of tradition
 and what that would do to their precious fans.
 
 The same Cubs who railroaded lights and night games down their fans'
 throats.  Tradition was certainly the last of their concerns then.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.1022They've been a model of consistencyPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 08 1992 20:123
    Bob, none of the reports I've heard said anything about the Cubs crying
    about tradition.  They have been complaining about west coast time
    zones and impact on WGN right from the start.
3.1023FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jul 08 1992 20:1615
    Divisioal play started in 1969 when Kansas City, Seattle (Pilots, not
    Mariners), San Diego and Montreal were added to MLB.  The Braves had
    been in Atlanta since 1966 and the NL has had their current alignment
    ever since.  It made no logical sense for Chicago and St Louis to be in
    the East and Cincinnati and Atlanta to be in the West, except that both
    Chicago and St Louis wanted to be together (great rivalry) and their
    rivalries with the Mets hadn't gotten off the ground.
    
    If I remember correctly, the AL alignment was:  West - Chicago, KC,
    Minn, Seattle, Oakland, California and the East was Boston, New York,
    Detroit, Cleveland, Baltimore, Washington and Detroit.  Seattle moved
    to Milwaukee and stayed in the West until the Senators moved to Texas
    and then the Brewers and Rangers swapped divisions.
    
    John
3.1024FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Jul 08 1992 20:164
    Just realized my last paragraph in my previous reply listed Detroit
    twice.    Sorry.
    
    John
3.1025re Paul's quipEARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Wed Jul 08 1992 20:3810
    
    Actually Paul, the Atlanta were in the NFC West for a similar reason
    as the Braves. back then the NFL had four divisions if I remember
    correctly - the Four C's (Coastal, Capital, Century, and Central),
    which then turned into the West, East, Central .... anyhow the Cowboys
    already had a fair amount of pull and threw a tantrum about their
    natural rivalries vs the Giants and Washington, and got to stay in the
    East (Capital ?), while the Atlanta were shunted west.

    Just another reason to hate Dallas if you ask me ...
3.1026PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Jul 08 1992 20:413
    Well, Phoenix is now in the East (and actually in St.Louis they were
    still a bit West for East), so maybe it's the Giants and Redskins that
    are to BLAM for being in the wrong division ;^)
3.1027COBRA::DINSMORESlash, the 2nd coming of AndelmenWed Jul 08 1992 21:465
    GO FLORIDA MARLINS!
    
    WHAT A TEAM!
    
    
3.1028GRANPA::DFAUSTNetworkin' the USA '92 TourThu Jul 09 1992 02:0621
    I still haven't read one thing that explains why this move is in the
    best interest of baseball. Is there one reason (like balance, wrecking
    the game forever, etc) that would cause Vincwnt to rule this way, other
    than to make the geography of the NL a bit more tidy. That doesn't wash
    IMHO as something that has anything to do with the best interest of the
    game. The Cubs motives for wanting to stay where they are don't really
    matter. They had the right (according to the NL constitution) to say
    no, they did so, and then Vincent decided that baseball as we know it
    would come to an end if the Cubs continued to play in the East.
    
    Kuhn got away with overruling the As trades back in '76 because, in his
    opinion, the competitive balance of baseball would have been harmed by
    allowing Finley to conduct a yard sale with his players. There is no
    such threat here. Vincent is just a bit power hungry. 
    
    BTW - I really think the move would be nice, to tidy up the geography.
    But I don't think you can ignore the NL constitution to "tidy up the
    geography".
    
    Dennis
     
3.1029Great note Dennis!CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentThu Jul 09 1992 11:475
 He could have easily put Dinz's in the East Big Game's in the West and went
 with a 13-12 split.....

 mike
3.1030CAMONE::WAYValhalla I am coming!Thu Jul 09 1992 12:3733
In reference to the Football alignment, St. Louis (now Phoenix) was always
in the East, I believe, back when they had just two divisions.

At least that's what I remember.

The East was


	Washington, New York, Baltimore, Dallas, St. Louis, Cleveland

The West was

	Green Bay, Chicago, Minnesota, Detroit, San Fran, LA



That's where most of the great rivalries were formed.




As to baseball, I know I'm a throwback, but i say screw the divisions.
Do it the old fashioned way -- one NL, one AL, one pennant in each,
then a world series.


And while they're at it, let them ride trains again too!


8^)


'Saw
3.1031FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Jul 09 1992 13:2814
    Not quite.  Prior to the 1960 expansion, it was:
    
    East:  New York, Washington, Philly, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Chicago
    Cardinals
    
    West:  Baltimore, Green Bay, Detroit, San Francisco, Rams, Bears
    
    Cardinals moved to St Louis in 1961, Dallas came in for 1960 and ended
    up in the East, Minnesota came in for 1961 and ended up in the West. 
    It stayed this way until the Saints and Falcons came in during the
    mid-sixties.
    
    John
    
3.1032RUGBY1::wayValhalla I am coming!Thu Jul 09 1992 14:1115
Thanks John.

I was doing it from hazy memory.


As a kid, circa 1965-66, I had a magazine (can't remember the name) but
it showed all the helmets, and the divisions the teams were in.

My apologies to all the Pittsburgh Steeler fans, and Philadelphia Eagle
fans for forgetting them -- they were some of the flashier helmets at the
time, although I believe that the Eagles had a white wing on green at the
time instead of silver on green....


'Saw
3.1033:-)SHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightThu Jul 09 1992 14:1710
3.1034CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHComing soon: Lindsey's Sister!!Thu Jul 09 1992 14:196
RE Iggles helmets

I recall a few years when they switched to green wings on a white helmet too.  
Maybe sometime in the 70's.

=Bob=
3.1035The logical choiceSHALOT::MEDVIDskip the hearts and flowersThu Jul 09 1992 14:326
    The starting outfield for the NL All-Stars is Bonds, Gwynn, and
    VanSlyke.  Where did Andy come from?  Last I heard, the final spot was
    between Bonilla and Strawberry.  Are they injured or did VanSlyke get a
    bunch of last-week votes?
    
    	--dan'l
3.1036They were a bad team with bad uniformsSHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightThu Jul 09 1992 14:3315
3.1037MCIS2::DHAMELOlympic Village IdiotThu Jul 09 1992 14:466
    
    >As a kid, circa 1965-66, I had a magazine (can't remember the name) but
    >it showed all the helmets, and the divisions the teams were in.
    
    Probably saw it it "Playboy's Pigskin Preview."
    
3.1038Marlins Uniforms - dINz, dis is for you :^)LCALOR::PETRIEDECwrite: Chas Barkley of softwareThu Jul 09 1992 14:49110
    The South Florida newspapers are full of the Marlins' uniform
    announcement this morning.  By far, the best article is this one,
    featured on the front page of the Ft Lauderdale Sun_Sentinel's
    Sports section.  (Hey, these guys know when to let a professional
    take over :^)  Reproduced wi/out permission. - Kath

                 MARLIN MANNEQUINS: NOT-SO-HOT COUTURE
    				     --	Rod Stafford Hagwood
    					Fashion Editor,
    					Ft Lauderdale Sun_Sentinel
    					July 9, 1992

    These Marlin people have no idea how to hold a fashion show.

    Where are the gilt chairs?

    Where are the socialites?

    For that matter, where is the fashion press? The only journalists
    at Joe Robbie Stadium for the unveiling of the Marlin uniforms
    seem to have something to do with sports coverage.  As I arrive
    for the press conference prepared to fight Italian `Vogue' for my
    seat, baseball writer Gordon Edes pretends not to know me.  It
    seems none of the other baseball writers has brought a fashion
    editor.  Sure, the Miami Herald sent a consultant, but someone
    waylaid him in the parking lot and sent him to faux press
    conference in Oakland Park.

    And while I'm complaining, who are these models?  They look so
    bush league.  Models actually smiling sincerely on the runway?

    "They *are* bush leaguers," columnist Craig Davis tells me. 
    "They're from Kissimmee."

    Oh.

    Anyway, this is obviously going to be like no fashion show I've
    ever seen, for this one is actually brief.  Most last
    approximately the time it takes for an elephant to gestate.  Not
    so with the Marlins.  Four outfits are shown, in mysterious
    categories called "road", "home", "batting", and the much
    ballyhooed "sleeveless home vest."  Ignoring that "sleeveless
    vest" is an oxymoron, I listen intently to Marlins President Carl
    Barger field questions.  He's talking about the vest.

    Ah, yes, the sleeves...
    -----------------------
    "We're tremendously excited about the short sleeve," Barger says. 
    "We thought it looked marvelous and we're enthusiastic.  This
    [uniform] is a blend of tradition and [the region]. It matches
    South Florida.  As they say in the retail world, they'll be a hot
    item."

    Now here's a man who knows how to talk fashion.  Tremendously
    excited.  Looks marvelous.  Blend of tradition.  Hot item.  If he
    had said, They're just so fabulous, I would have thought he
    designed them.

    He didn't.  A committee did.  I catch up with Anne Occi, vice
    president of design for Major League Baseball Properties, after
    all these sports people make a bee-line to Barger to ask about the
    vest and the T-shirt underneath.  There are questions about the
    shade of blue.  Is it teal?  Is it aqua?  Is it of importance to
    anyone? (That last one is mine.)

    Occi tells me how they kept switching elements around.  First the
    lettering was changed a billion times.  Then the black accents
    were changed a zillion times.  Belt loops were hidden, then
    exposed, then put back in the stealth mode.  For a while, orange
    was the color.  Prototypes were sewn up, and they even had fashion
    shows on the diamond - a sort of field of seams - that they
    videotaped to see how the uniforms looked on television and under
    stadium lights and in daylight.  Then came the lettering.

    "The lettering sort of has a fin on it, y'know," Occi says.  "The
    Marlin is embroidered.  I think they really have their own
    personality."

    Oh.

    Scouting Report
    ---------------
    She scares me.  I call a baseball fanatic friend who wants the
    lowdown on the uniforms before she sees them on the evening news. 
    What did you think of them, she asks.

    "Well, the black accents in the socks and the belt as well as the
    road cap will make people think the Marlins are authoritative and
    serious.  The blue - whatever shade of blue it is - will impart a
    feeling of trustworthiness and dependability."

    She tries to interrupt me, but I'm on a roll.

    "Now the only problem I see is that a soft blue like this is a
    warm tone.  If you've had your colors done and are a spring, then
    you're home safe - so to speak.  But if you are a winter or, God
    forbid, an autumn, then there's going to be trouble."

    "Have you lost what precious little was left of your mind?" she
    blurts out, destroying my concentration.

    "They didn't even wear the vest right," I say.  "They put a
    T-shirt underneath.  It should be worn alone with a couple of
    chains and maybe a tattoo on the upper arm; something like `Born
    to Bat'.  And that cap should be turned backward.  Then we could
    have a motto: `Homeboys make better home runs,' for instance. 
    What do you think?"

    She's hung up. I'm not sure when.
3.1039MCIS2::DHAMELOlympic Village IdiotThu Jul 09 1992 15:1110
    
    Is there a matching clutch purse that holds batting gloves, tobacco,
    emory boards, bankbooks, and the like?
    
    And the shoes?  What about the complementing foot fashions?
    
    I really need to know.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.1040MCIS2::DHAMELOlympic Village IdiotThu Jul 09 1992 15:126
    
    And another thing....If they're going to wear sleeveless shirts, they
    really should shave their pits for national audiences.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.1041AXIS::ROBICHAUDNewYorkSaysNoSLAPingThu Jul 09 1992 16:054
    	If dInZ wears one of those sleeveless shirts, with his guns,
    look out!
    
    				/Don
3.1042CAMONE::WAYValhalla I am coming!Thu Jul 09 1992 18:5616
>    >As a kid, circa 1965-66, I had a magazine (can't remember the name) but
>    >it showed all the helmets, and the divisions the teams were in.
>    
>    Probably saw it it "Playboy's Pigskin Preview."


I checked with my mom.  As best as she can remember, I used to subscribe
to something called "Golden Magazine" back then.   Probably put out by
the same folks who make Little Golden Books.

I didn't discover Playboy for another year or two if I remember right....


'Saw
    

3.1043:-)SHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightThu Jul 09 1992 19:2710
3.1044CAMONE::WAYValhalla I am coming!Thu Jul 09 1992 19:3760
3.1045'Saw, is you the Wilson character from "Home Improvement"?NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 09 1992 19:501
    
3.1046Attaboy !!!SCNDRL::HUNTHe-Man Tar Heel Haters ClubThu Jul 09 1992 20:133
Much much better, 'Saw.

Bob Hunt
3.1047CAMONE::WAYValhalla I am coming!Thu Jul 09 1992 20:3519
Bob, thanks.

Sometimes I forget myself, and just put in normal replies....8^)



Glenn,

No, but I wish I was.  Wilson is such an inspiration to me.  I love the
character -- he has it SO together.




Well, hate to leave in a rush, but I'm off to make a birch canoe.
You know, you just cut away everything that isn't a canoe...8^)


'Saw
3.1048Mets are TOO BLAM !SALES::THILLFri Jul 10 1992 14:5028
    Re: Shifting alignment
    
    The thing about this whole Cubs thing is that the METS are really the
    ones TOO BLAM ! See, back in 1968 or so when they decided to let
    Montral and San Diego in and split up the divisions, there was a lot of
    disagreements over how they should make the split. The Mets 2 biggest
    draws were, not surprisingly, the Dodgers and Giants, and they didn't
    want to give up home games with them. As a compromise, the NL said
    we'll give you the Cardinals and Cubs, 2 old, traditional teams. 
    
    As for relative strengths in the divisions, that always fluctuates from
    year to year. Originally, when the Seantors/Rangers moved west and 
    switched divisions with Milwaukee, the White Sox were originally
    supposed to move east, but all the big cities would then be in the
    east. Dunno why that made a difference, but... Anyway, that year, the
    White Sox were 2nd behind the A's in the west, but would have won the
    east by soemthing like 6 games when the Tigers, Red Sox, etc. were in a
    mad scamble....
    
    As for the Cubs plight, screw 'em. The Braves & Reds have been playing a 
    lot on the west coast for 20+ years and they are Eastern teams, yet the
    Cubs whine about the central time zone difference. BTW, the Braves are
    also on a "Superstation," so the same rules should apply.
    
    Funny thing is, I used to *like* the Cubs, but not any more. The
    Tribune Corp has just exposed itself as the money grubbers they are.
    
    Tom
3.1049CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHComing soon: Lindsey's Sister!!Fri Jul 10 1992 14:546
Rat on about the Cubbies.  They had a certain charm about them when ol' PK 
Wrigley was the owner.  Since the Tribune Corp. took over, they have repeatedly
shown self interest over the good of baseball, and worse yet, over tradition 
(lights at Wrigley!)

=Bob= 
3.1050FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Fri Jul 10 1992 14:5618
    The more I think about it, the more I think the following:
    
    1.  The geographic realignment is only really necessary if they go to a
    different schedule method than what the American League uses. 
    Geographically, it doesn't really matter what scheme the American
    League uses since the teams in the AL play 6 games in 10 different
    cities and 7 games in the 3 other cities.  Therefore, with a balanced
    schedule, the Cubs don't have a case but on the other hand, there's
    really no need to realign.
    
    2.  If they go to an unbalanced schedule (either the original AL scheme
    of 15 against each team in the division or the proposed NL scheme of 20
    against each team in the division), the Cubs have a case based on TV
    but really not much of a case based on travel.  The Braves and Reds
    will really have a case based on travel since their travel miles and
    times will increase dramatically.
    
    John
3.1051BSS::JCOTANCHFri Jul 10 1992 15:014
    If the NL goes to an unbalanced schedule, it will most likely be a 16-9
    format with 3 'swing' games.
    
    Joe
3.1052EARRTH::BROOKSMoons Over My Hammy ...Fri Jul 10 1992 15:179
    re Bob and Saw

    Shame on you Bob, browbeating 'Saw into being Anthropologically Correct.

    Sigh ....

    :-)

    Doc
3.1053CAMONE::WAYValhalla I am coming!Fri Jul 10 1992 15:589
re Doc:    8^)


re Re-alignment.


	Hell, I say pull San Fran and LA back to New York (where they
	belong).   Move Montreal west to Calgary or Vancouver.
	Then let the chips fall where they may......[many 8^)]
3.1054AXIS::ROBICHAUDNewYorkSaysNoSLAPingFri Jul 10 1992 16:005
    	With their plethora of homerun hitters who can't get out of
    their own way in the field the Cubs probably belong in the ALmost
    League anyway.
    
    				/Don
3.1055CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentFri Jul 10 1992 16:145
 If the NL doesn't go to an unbalance schedule Fay look bad. Expect them to
 go to it to protect their puppet.....

 mike
3.1056What about the Bay Area ???SHALOT::HUNTEverybody Wang Chung TonightFri Jul 10 1992 16:208
 Also with the SF Jints apparently on the move, this realignment might be
 moot in a hurry.  If they move to St Pete, Buffalo or Washington, Vincent
 will have the "geography" question opened up all over again.
 
 Maybe we oughta send MrT to help Fay out.  He'll settle all those nasty
 geography issues.
 
 Bob Hunt
3.1057looks like he's already there ;^)CNTROL::CHILDSAndre Marrou for PresidentFri Jul 10 1992 16:220
3.1058JUPITR::PARTEEIt's a great day for hockey!Fri Jul 10 1992 16:3990
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (Mike Royko)
Newsgroups: clari.feature.mike_royko
Subject: FAY'S WAY: CUBS JOIN FOREIGN LEGION
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 92 22:08:02 EDT
 
MIKE ROYKO
	This man named Fay, who is the baseball commissioner, is said to be a
smart guy. But I wonder. If he's so smart, how come he can't even read a
map?
	You don't have to be an astronaut to figure it out. From Wrigley
Field in Chicago to Shea Stadium in New York, is about 800 miles.
	But if you head the other way from Chicago and go 800 miles, you will
be in a town called Julesburg, Colo.
	And if you get up the next morning and go 800 miles beyond Julesburg,
Colo., you will be in a place called St. George, Utah. So, bored out of
your mind, you go a few hundred miles more and you're finally in Los
Angeles. Which isn't much of a reward for so long a trip.
	So what's my point? That it ought to be obvious that Chicago is a lot
closer to New York than it is to Los Angeles or San Francisco or San
Diego.
	The question is, why does this man named Fay want to upset the
natural order of things by trying to turn Chicago into a Western town?
	That's what Fay is doing when he insists that for the good of
baseball the Cubs must switch to the Western Division of the National
League.
	Why is this good for baseball? It's hard enough being a Cubs fan
without being thrown into a foreign culture.
	Yes, that's what it is. Chicago is not west. It's not exactly east,
either, but it's a lot more east than west.
	In our lifestyles, recreational choices and attitudes, we have little
in common with the other Western Division cities.
	Unlike Denver, this is not a cowboy boot or ski slope city. Unlike
San Diego, this is not a surfing bum town. Unlike Los Angeles, we don't
eat much raw fish. And unlike San Francisco, we don't ... well, most of
us don't, so let's not talk about it.
	But consider the cities that we've been sharing our baseball lives
with for many years. Pittsburgh, for starters. It's not as sooty as it
used to be, but like Chicago, it's still a gritty, ethnic, shot-and-beer
town. If you go into a San Diego bar and order a boilermaker and a
boiled egg, they will call the Health Police.
	There's Philadelphia, another tough ethnic town. Forget about the
Liberty Bell. It's now better known for Rocky Balboa. Try to picture
Rocky working out by punching bloody sides of beef in San Francisco.
Hah, the entire city would faint.
	Why, I remember what happened when Mike Ditka hit a shrieking San
Francisco fan in the head with a wad of his chewing gum. The creature
wailed so loudly that thought was given to turning the matter over to a
federal grand jury. Why, in a real city, like Cleveland or Milwaukee,
the fan would have peeled the gum from his brow and chewed it. Waste
not, want not, a solid heartland virtue.
	And as much as Chicagoans might deny it, we have a great deal in
common with New York. Same silly urge to put up skyscrapers, same kind
of murder rate, goofy street gangs, kinky politicians, racial strife.
Even Al Capone is shared. He became famous in Chicago, but he grew up in
New York.
	When Frank Sinatra performs, he always sings: ``New Yawk, New Yawk,''
and ``My kind of town, Chicaguh is.'' You don't hear him singing, ``My
kind of town, Houston, Texas, is.'' Or, ``Denver, Colorado, if you can
make it there, you can make it anywhere.''
	Apparently this man Fay does not believe in tradition. If he did,
he'd remember that the Cubs have always been in Chicago, and they've
been here since major-league baseball began.
	You don't have to be an ancient to remember when Houston, San Diego
and the others were minor-league cities. If it hadn't been for the
invention of air conditioning, they would still be amusing themselves by
shooting snakes and swatting giant skeeters.
	So after more than a century of being a genuine, big-league
franchise, with a rich tradition going back to the days of tiny gloves
and the dead ball, when men were men and the shortstop was usually
drunk, is this guy Fay saying that we must now try to establish a
rivalry with San Diego, where they sell sushi at the ballpark, or the
Denver Whoosits, which won't even start having a tradition for another
50 years?
	Traditional rivalries are not created by marketing. They come from
years of mutual loathing, vicious joy at the misfortune of others. The
Mets and the Cubs -- the hatred is from the heart.
	But San Diego? Even if I pretended to hate a Padres fan, he would
probably look blankly at me and say: ``Hey, dude, I mean, you want to
use my suntan lotion?''
	We should have expected this years ago, when they started messing
with the natural order by making the Cubs play in the same division as
Montreal, a city of Frenchies, where it's practically against the law to
speak English.
	Now they want to toss the Cubs in with teams from California, where
it's practically against the law to be wide awake. Well, in that regard,
this Cubs team will be competitive.
	
	(C) 1992 BY THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE
	DISTRIBUTED BY TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
    
3.1059Could be the first step to the Carolina GiantsSHALOT::MEDVIDdancin' pretzelsWed Jul 22 1992 17:346
    Today's Charlotte Observer is carrying the story that Hornets owner
    George Shinn is talking to the owner of the SF Giants about purchasing
    the team.  They are to talk again next week.  If Shinn buys the Giants
    he says he will move them to St. Petersburg.  
    
    	--dan'l
3.1060would be a naturalFRETZ::HEISERthe extremistThu Jul 23 1992 16:001
    Phoenix is talking to them too.  We already host their AAA team.
3.1061No factsSHALOT::MEDVIDdancin' pretzelsThu Jul 23 1992 17:035
    Heard last night that Shinn is not interested in the Giants.  Instead,
    he, a lifelong Dodger fan, wants LA and would trade the Hornets
    straight up for the Dodgers.
    
    	--dan'l
3.1062ROYALT::ASHEDon't push me cause I'm close to the edgeThu Jul 23 1992 17:092
    Cubs won a stay in court to stay in the NL East.
    
3.1063SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Jul 23 1992 17:131
       Amazing!
3.1064??CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Jul 23 1992 17:273
    What court did they take it to? State, municipal, federal?
    
    
3.1065ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Jul 23 1992 17:3976
From nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!decwrl!looking!clarinews Thu Jul 23 13:33:22 EDT 1992
Article 16218 of clari.sports.baseball:
Xref: e2big.mko.dec.com clari.sports.baseball:16218 clari.news.urgent:5615
Path: e2big.mko.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!decwrl!looking!clarinews
>From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball,clari.local.illinois,clari.news.urgent
Subject: Cubs win stay in realignment
Keywords: baseball, men's professional, legalities
Message-ID: <bb-realignU2lN12pe@clarinet.com>
References: <bb-realignU2lH200ac@clarinet.com>
X-Supersedes: <bb-realignU2lN11ac@clarinet.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 92 9:05:50 PDT
Location: illinois
ACategory: sports
Slugword: bb-realign
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 522; Id: z3995; Sel: xxsbp; Adate: 7-23-12ped; Ver: 2/4; V: ld
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
Codes: ysbprxx., ysblrxx., &sbpril., &sblril.
Note: (complete writethru -- adding Cubs reaction, other detail from judge's
 ruling)

	CHICAGO (UPI) -- A federal judge Thursday issued a court order
temporarily barring baseball Commissioner Fay Vincent from ordering the
Chicago Cubs to move from the National League East to the National
League West.
	U.S. District Judge Suzanne Conlon issued a written opinion on the
Cubs' suit challenging the authority of Vincent to order the division
switch and ``interpreted the league's Constitution, which she construes
as supporting the Cubs' position,'' a court spokesman said.
	Vincent ``exceeded his authority in ordering the transfer'' and his 
``unprecedented action'' violated Article VII of the Major League
Agreement, Conlon wrote. ``The Chicago Cubs may not be transferred to
the Western Division without their consent.''
	Cubs spokeswoman Sharon Pannozzo said the team is ``very pleased''
with the ruling.
	``While the matter is not yet finally resolved, the action today was
a good thing for Chicago, the Cubs, their fans and the game of baseball,
'' the club's statement read.
	There was no immediate reaction from the commissioner and another
hearing was scheduled for July 31.
	The Cubs argued Vincent's decision to move the team to the NL West is
``absurd'' and ``not in the best interests of baseball.''
	Vincent on July 6 ordered the Cubs and St. Louis Cardinals to move to
the NL West and the Cincinnati Reds and Atlanta Braves to the NL East
next season. Vincent said he ordered the change to make the two
divisions geographically correct.
	The judge's decision to issue a preliminary injunction Thursday
apparently will delay that change for at least one more season. The suit
has held up finalization of next season's schedule for more than a
month.
	The Cubs and parent the Tribune Co. -- which also owns WGN-AM and TV,
the Cubs' main broadcast outlet -- objected to the change, largely
because the move may mean more late-night games on the West Coast and a
subsequent drop in advertising revenue. The move also would water down
the Cubs' longtime rivalry with the New York Mets.
	Vincent argued he has the authority to make the move without the
approval of the teams under wording granting him virtually unlimited
power to act ``in the best interests of baseball.''
	``But that interpretation would ... produce the absurdity that the
commissioner could order the Cubs to play in the American League or even
destroy the very leagues and clubs that created the commissioner,'' the
Cubs argued.
	The Cubs said although the commissioner has the authority to alter
any ``act, transaction or practice,'' he does not have unlimited
authority and his power does not extend to ``the pre-existing structure
of baseball and a league's failure to change it.''
	Vincent claimed his authority to act in the best interests of
baseball is so strong that the Major League Agreement bars legal action
by clubs contesting his decisions. He said the Cubs' claim they would
suffer irreparable harm if the transfer goes through is ``nothing more
than unbridled speculation and conjecture.''


    
3.1066ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Jul 23 1992 17:4422
    re: Cubs
    
    1) Lets see what happens if the court give a permanent injunction and
    the case moves out of the Chicago area.
    
    2) One of the reasons that Vincent could not force Steinbrenner to sell
    his team was that no court would have approved such a move because it
    meant essentially taking someones property. Sure Steinbrenner could
    have sold, but forcing him to sell would have lowered what he could
    have gotten for the team. I wonder if this case will fall into the same
    category, at least as far as the courts are concerned. Of course the
    Cubs also have the NL constitution working in their favor.
    
    That aside I think the Cubs are being very pig-headed about this, and
    that they should be moved to the Western division.
    
    Sigh, guess we'll have thaty god-awful AL type schedule in the NL next
    year. Watch, Mets will finish playing Cardinals or Pirates or whoever
    int the East in June or July - blech!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1067Must be consistent with this year's alignmentSHALOT::MEDVIDdancin' pretzelsThu Jul 23 1992 17:585
    What will happen if the Giants move to St. Pete?  Seems no one in the
    Bay area wants to build them a new stadium.  What team do you move out
    west then?
    
    	--dan'l
3.1068REDSOX!CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Jul 23 1992 18:061
    
3.1069MAPVAX::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Jul 23 1992 19:267
    That long time tradition of playing the Mets started in what, 1960 or
    so?  Oooohhh, I'm impressed.
    
    What would be so terrible about making the Cubs move to the AL?  I
    don't think it would happen anyway since there is already an AL club in
    Chicago.  Professional Football moved some NFL teams into the AFC yet
    the world is still revolving.
3.1070I can see the Cubs *fans'* complaints...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Jul 23 1992 19:5917
                                        
    > That aside I think the Cubs are being very pig-headed about this, and
    > that they should be moved to the Western division.
    
    After hearing some other opinions and thinking about it, I've changed 
    my mind on this.  Granted the Cubs are probably only worried about the 
    almighty dollar, but what *should* be the issue?  It should be about 
    what the fans in the affected cities want.  If I were a Chicago Cubs
    fan, I wouldn't be happy about the divisional change.  If I were an
    Atlanta, Cincinnati, or St. Louis fan, I probably wouldn't be happy 
    about it either.  Why should I be?  I'm not the one who has to foot the
    travel bills, and I've gotten used to the rivalries.  If geography is
    a real problem, it should have been dealt with in 1969 when the
    divisions were set up this way...
    
    glenn
      
3.1071Fans don't seem upsetACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Jul 23 1992 20:198
    re: .1070
    
    But we haven't really heard complaints from fans in Atlanta, Cincy,
    Chicago, or St. Louis. In fact the only bitching by other clubs was 
    about Vincent making the decision the way he did.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1072Funny stuff coming outta ChiSHALOT::HUNTWas KO too late for SERP ???Thu Jul 23 1992 20:4113
 And like I said before, the Cubs didn't exactly give a crap when their
 oh-so-important fans complained about the lights.
 
 But now all of a sudden, it's the fans they're trying to protect.  Yeah,
 right.  It's their purse strings they're trying to protect.   Since when
 has it been otherwise.
 
 Major rollward on the rivalry with the Mets angle.  Yeah, we don't want to
 go west, young man, 'cause we wanna see the Mets come to town the usual 9
 times a year instead of maybe 6 times under the new system.   <insert
 major guffaws>
 
 Bob Hunt
3.1073AXIS::ROBICHAUDRIP Howard SternFri Jul 24 1992 10:262
    It's a great day for the Chicago Tribune, WGN and the Nine O'Clock
    News!
3.1074the guy who said "Cubs Whine" is right onJARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasFri Jul 24 1992 13:025
    Funny, the Braves play in the West and I never hear complaints from
    them about revenue lost in night games with SF/SD/LA...
    
    
    py
3.1075SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Jul 24 1992 13:122
     'TBS has no nightly news show.
                                  Denny
3.1076And no, I'm not a Cubs' fan...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 24 1992 13:2326
                                                
> And like I said before, the Cubs didn't exactly give a crap when their
> oh-so-important fans complained about the lights.
> 
> But now all of a sudden, it's the fans they're trying to protect.  Yeah,
> right.  It's their purse strings they're trying to protect.   Since when
> has it been otherwise.
    
    C'mon, Bob.  The Cubs schedule something like 12 night games a year,
    which still represents the most "pure" environment in baseball, 
    especially for the kids.  The real issue with the lights was having
    them there for potential postseason games and the All-Star game, and
    that's MLB's baby, not the Cubs' (Uebberoth was threatening to move
    Cubs' postseason games to a neutral site).  And most of the people 
    squawking about the lights were the people who lived in the Wrigley 
    neighborhood, anyway, not the average fan on the street.
    
    If the Cubs are to be condemned for bringing in a small amount of night
    baseball 40 years after everyone else did, what does that say for
    everyone else?  By that standard, some of these
    no-day-games-but-Sunday-100%-artificial-playing-surface-under-a-dome
    teams know no limits when it comes to greed... 
    
    glenn
    
    
3.1077They shouldn't complain, they're raking it in as it is...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 24 1992 13:3012
    > Funny, the Braves play in the West and I never hear complaints from
    > them about revenue lost in night games with SF/SD/LA...
    
    The Braves have absolutely no complaint whichever way the decision goes.
    They, the Mets, and the Cubs (in that order) have virtually cornered the 
    market on nationally-televised superstation baseball, which can't change 
    under the current laws because the number of free superstations allowed 
    in a cable market is strictly regulated (at two)...
    
    glenn 
    
3.1078Unbalanced schedule may be Tribune's big fearNROPST::MPO12::MCFALLThis is the end of the innocenceFri Jul 24 1992 15:3810
	In regards to the $$$$ lost due to the 9 PM news being lost - true,
if the AL balanced schedule is used, only  5-6 nights are affected. However,
if an unbalanced schedule is used, playing another 3 dates in each of
LA, San Francisco, San Diego, and Houston, plus 9 games in Denver instead
of Miami, and you could see another 12 nights being affected. That's real
enough for me. What Vincent COULD do, is offer the 4 teams involved some
financial incentive to "ease the burden", as it were. 

	Jim M
3.1079ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Jul 24 1992 17:435
    The teams on the West Coast have already offered some earlier start
    times, that should solve the WGN News issue.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1080NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Jul 24 1992 19:0111
                   
    We've got a contradictory argument going here.  Everyone is saying that 
    the Cubs are motivated solely by greed, but at the same time they're 
    saying that they're not going to lose any money because the schedule 
    changes and West Coast start times aren't going to be drastically 
    different.  So which is it?  Maybe the Cubs just don't want to mess 
    around with what they feel is a decent formula, and I really can't 
    blame them for that...
    
    glenn
    
3.1081ANGLIN::PAPACEKMon Jul 27 1992 13:5017
    
    I think the main loss to WGN would be in advertising revenues.   They
    most likely have different rates of west coast games based on viewer
    levels.    And since west coast games would start at 9:00 (CDT), 
    there would also be disruption of the 9:00 news and it's ad revenues.
    
    The local Fox network had been trying to break into the 9:00 news slot
    and this would give them more opportunities to gain market share with
    the non-baseball fans.
      
    Rest assured, money is the primary reason. WGN wouldn't go through all 
    this for the fans.  It is a decent formula today, (except for Cincinatti 
    and Atlanta) but in the long term interests of baseball - I agree with 
    Faye.
    
    Pat
    
3.1082Now we'll see what Cincy is made of.CTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Mon Jul 27 1992 16:2513
    How 'bout dem Braves?
    
    Wining 13 of 14 with EXCITING baseball. Think they'll hold off the
    Reds?  Glavine, Avery, Smoltz, Liebrandt and the opposition praying
    for monsoons.
    Can any of our Southern brethren tell us if the "Chop" is still
    fervently practiced?  Haven't heard much of the way in protest. 
    Waiting for the klieg lights of postseason?
    
    
    MikeL
     
    
3.1083Glad Ninj ain't here. >< of, inCTHQ4::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Mon Jul 27 1992 16:271
    
3.1084ROYALT::ASHEDon't push me cause I'm close to the edgeMon Jul 27 1992 16:404
    They still do it, but I don't know if they beat the tom-tom any more.
    More unofficial, then official, from what I can tell.  Then again,
    they did have Budweiser tomahawk night earlier this year.
    
3.1085CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityMon Jul 27 1992 18:106
Anyone see Otis Nixon's catch from Friday night?   

HE should be in the Olympics in the high jump.....


'Saw
3.1086Musta done some toot before the gameSHALOT::MEDVIDthe profits of addictive extinctionMon Jul 27 1992 19:1310
>Anyone see Otis Nixon's catch from Friday night?   
    
    That was probably the greatest catch I have ever seen.  There are lots
    of homerun stealing catches, but that one was all one fluidly timed
    motion.
    
    VanSlyke's face at that moment was pretty priceless too.  If the Pirates
    lose the division by one game, I'll always look to that moment.
    
    	--dan'l
3.1087CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Mon Jul 27 1992 19:235
That's where Van Slyke's quote I put in came from - Nixon is the 'ex-President'

Absolutely amazing catch.

JD
3.1088SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Jul 27 1992 19:2616
    
>    That was probably the greatest catch I have ever seen.  There are lots
>    of homerun stealing catches, but that one was all one fluidly timed
>    motion.
    
    	Ahh Dan'l you're just showing your age, or lack of....  I saw the
    catch and it was a great one, but Clemente used to do that sort of 
    thing a couple of times a year and he did it for 18 years!  He'd
    make a catch like that and then throw out the runner tagging up at
    home with a rope on the fly!!  None of this worm-burner stuff..
    
    You know, he wasn't called 'the great one' for nuttin.
    
    
    								bill..g.
    
3.1089I know it was one of the best I've ever seen, in that situation...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Jul 27 1992 19:317
    Waitaminute, Bill, wasn't Clemente flat on his back on the other side
    of that wall when he stole away that game-winning home run and made the 
    throw home to catch the speedy runner tagging from third?  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
3.1090CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityMon Jul 27 1992 19:4911
>
>    Waitaminute, Bill, wasn't Clemente flat on his back on the other side
>    of that wall when he stole away that game-winning home run and made the 
>    throw home to catch the speedy runner tagging from third?  ;-)
    
Yeah, after he was blinded by the sun, and he was actually slowed some
on his run, because he caught a spike in a drain.....


8^)    

3.1091MCIS2::DHAMELSir Charles, the Dream BullyMon Jul 27 1992 20:037
    
    And how could you fail to mention that Clemente's catch was when
    players had to run through snow drifts, uphill, and milk the cows
    before they could throw home!  Those were real players in those days.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.1092SA1794::GUSICJReferees whistle while they work..Mon Jul 27 1992 20:3127
    
    
    	Ahh, you guys are just jealous that you never saw the great one
    play in person!  
    
    	Ahh, to remember the days when a single to right wasn't automatic
    to score from second...that is with Clemente in right.  Ahh, to
    remember when the great one used to throw out runners at first on
    a supposed base hit.  Ahh, to remember that the great one didn't
    need to roll the ball to the plate like most outfielders do today.
    Ahh, to remember the great one climbing the ivy at Forbes... Ahh,
    to remember that nobody went from 1st to 3rd on a basehit to right
    when Roberto was there.  
    
    	Ahh...memories are great!  They don't make 'em like Roberto
    anymore!
    
    	You guys can have the candy-armed outfield of today along with
    the bushel-baskets they use for gloves along with the "I made a
    great catch in my 10 year career...once."  I'll still take the great
    one even if he did have to play in raging wind storms, hail, snow,
    drifts, and searing heat.  You guys are weenies and deserve
    the weiners you root for who are desguised as baseball players.
    
    	Now, you wanna talk about park effects?
    
    
3.1093ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Jul 27 1992 20:505
    Jealousy - nope. I saw Clemente play against the Mets in either 1970 or
    1971, maybe 1972.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1094CELTIK::JACOBSun-ripened for Mildness!Tue Jul 28 1992 00:2315
    re the Tomahawk Chop
    
    Yeah, they still do it.  Watched some of the games from Atlanta this
    weekend and got sick of seeing all of those people looking like Pee Wee
    Herman in an adult theatre every time some Brave player came to bat.
    
    Re Clemente
    
    Saw him play from '60 or '61 when I started going to Pirate games until
    he died.  Was at the game he got his 3000th, and last, hit( a double).
    He definitely was the best right fielder I've ever seen, either in
    person or on the idiot box.
    
    JaKe
    
3.1095PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Jul 28 1992 16:133
3.1096My Idol and Hero.. The Greatest..MOCA::REYES_JTue Jul 28 1992 18:1813
    
    	RE: Clemente..
    
    		I got the honor of seeing him play in person in Wrigley
    Field a couple of times.. And on the tube a bunch of times.. He was
    without a doubt the great one. The idol of many baseball fans and not
    even baseball fans. 
    
    		I've always been a Met's fan and when the Buc's played the
    Met's, of course I wanted the Met's to win but I always rooted for Mr.
    Clemente even if it meant a loss. 
    
    	Julio
3.1097calling TcM, calling TcM......CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeTue Jul 28 1992 18:2510
    Speaking of the Mets,  isn't "the greatest team money can buy"
    
    2 games below .500?
    
    ~/~
    
    ;^)
    
    Kev
    
3.1098ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Jul 28 1992 19:289
    re: .1097
    
    Nah that title is reserved for with the Dodgers or the Red Sox,
    and btw that quip will cost you a beer on Friday at the OTP :-)
    
    and that is TCM to you, not TcM :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1099I'd rather have poor taste than poor judgementSHALOT::MEDVIDthe profits of addictive extinctionTue Jul 28 1992 19:4411
3.1100GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPersonal Computer GroupTue Jul 28 1992 20:238
    Pretty compassionate of you Dan'l.
    
    The fact that he is (apparently) able to overcome his dependency on
    chemicals and still rise to such a level of athleticism speaks volumes
    of his character.
    
    
    Mark.
3.1101PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Jul 28 1992 20:2511
  Count me as another Roberto Clemente fan. It always seemed like the tougher
  the competition, the better the "Great One" played. I remember more than 
  once when Sandy Koufax was in his prime, he would 3 or 4 hit the Bucs.
  Clemente usually had 2 or 3 of those hits. 

  Also, he had the best arm in the outfield for any baseball player
  I've ever seen. 

  I always thought he'd play forever until that plane crash in the Caribbean.

		Keith
3.1102ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Jul 28 1992 20:265
    Defining moment for me wrt Clemente was leading the Bucs back against
    the Orioles in the 1971 WS after they were down 2-0.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1103PEAKS::WOESTEHOFFTue Jul 28 1992 20:339
>    Defining moment for me wrt Clemente was leading the Bucs back against
>    the Orioles in the 1971 WS after they were down 2-0.
    
  Yep, I think he had something like 7 RBI's in the series and twice he
  nailed runners trying to stretch doubles into triples. In both cases, they 
  would have been triples if anyone else was playin right field. The throws
  made great highlight films.
  
	Keith    
3.1104Yeah, that's a pretty tough stance...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Jul 28 1992 21:0216
    > The fact that he is (apparently) able to overcome his dependency on
    > chemicals and still rise to such a level of athleticism speaks volumes
    > of his character.
    
    Not to mention that Otis Nixon is only one of many ballplayers who have
    used drugs over the years, like a fair portion of the 1979 Pittsburgh 
    Pirates championship team who were implicated in baseball's famous 
    drug scandal of the early 1980s, including the wonderful virtuous 
    Willie Stargell who've we already heard that no present-day ballplayer 
    can ever hope to approach.  You hate to see it, but drug use hits home 
    all over and often without any sense or reason to it, and there has to 
    be at least a second chance...
    
    glenn
       
3.1105BSS::JCOTANCHThu Aug 06 1992 16:403
    It's been announced that the expansion draft will be Nov. 17th.
    
    Joe
3.1106Maybe a place for 'Door' Matt Young?SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Aug 06 1992 17:013
       Just think about how really BAD the pitching staffs of these 2 new
    teams are gonna be! Does the American League get to lose players too?
                                 Denny
3.1107PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Aug 07 1992 12:585
    Yes, the American League gets to lose players too.  But, they won't
    lose as many as National League teams.  The two leagues cut a deal that
    says the American League teams can protect more players, and in
    exchange, they get a smaller share of the franchise fees from the new
    teams.
3.1108AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Aug 07 1992 13:211
    	MY Braves completed their sweep of the Reds last night!
3.1109CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Aug 07 1992 13:292
/DonVane (TM)
3.1110AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Aug 07 1992 13:473
    	Shaadup JD.  I'm a loooong time Braves fain.
    
    				/Don
3.1111CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Aug 07 1992 14:016
/DonVane(TM) -

Nexted thing ya know, you'll turn into Dr. /DonVane(TM) and claim you used
to live in Atlanta!

JD
3.1112BSS::JCOTANCHFri Aug 07 1992 14:549
    RE: Expansion draft
    
    36 players will be drafted by each team:
    Each NL team will lose 3 players (36)
    8 AL teams will lose 3 players   (24)
    6 AL teams will lose 2 players   (12)
    
    
    Joe
3.1113SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Aug 07 1992 15:063
       Hey /Don, when you see Dinz tell him to write to his new favorite
    team, the Marlins , and beg them to draft Matt Young and Jack Clark!!
                                 Denny
3.1114ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Aug 07 1992 15:1410
    One thing that may make the expansion team of 1993 better than thos in
    the past is free agency. When Toronto and Seattle got franchises, free
    agency was just starting. The guy who owns the Marlins has oodles of
    money. With Bonds, Sierra, Maddux, Cone, Drabek (I know I am missing
    some) all free agents this year an expansion team can become
    competitive very quickyl and real contenders in a ear or two. Granted
    signing free agens is a crapshoot, but it has helped teams before.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1115The Expansion Draft ExplainedPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Aug 07 1992 15:2768
              <<< VAXWRK::$1$DUS6:[NOTES$LIBRARY]RED_SOX.NOTE;1 >>>
                          -< Boston Red Sox Baseball >-
================================================================================
Note 287.3                  How does Expansion Work?                      3 of 7
AIAG::KURAS "Lou, pull up your socks!"               60 lines   6-AUG-1992 08:13
                         -< Official Expansion Rules >-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 3105 of clari.sports.baseball:
Path: engage.pko.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!pa.dec.com!decwrl!ub!rutgers!stanford.edu!bcm!wupost!uunet!looking!clarinews
From: clarinews@clarinet.com (UPI)
Newsgroups: clari.sports.baseball
Subject: Expansion draft set for Nov. 17
Keywords: baseball, men's professional
Message-ID: <bb-draftU2a5710pe@clarinet.com>
Date: 5 Aug 92 23:18:51 GMT
Lines: 41
Approved: clarinews@clarinet.com
ACategory: sports
Slugword: bb-draft
Priority: regular
Format: regular
ANPA: Wc: 418; Id: z6744; Sel: xxsbp; Adate: 8-5-710ped
Codes: ysbprxx., tnrb...., txia....


	NEW YORK (UPI) -- Fans of the expansion Colorado Rockies and Florida
Marlins should mark Tuesday, Nov. 17, on their calendars.
	That's the day major-league baseball will hold its expansion draft to
fill the rosters of the National League's two newest clubs, the
commissioner's office announced Wednesday.
	The three-round draft, which will be held at New York's Marriott
Marquis Hotel, is the first such event since Nov. 5, 1976, when the
Toronto Blue Jays and Seattle Mariners stocked their rosters with
castoffs from the other major-league clubs.
	Under a fairly complicated set of rules, 1993's expansion teams will
choose a total of 72 players from the pool of talent left unprotected by
the 26 other major-league teams.
	The Rockies and Marlins begin play this coming season.
	All players in an existing organization are eligible to be drafted,
except two categories of players with no prior major-league experience.
	The first group consists of players who have less than three years of
service if signed at age 19 or older. The other is those players with
less than four years of service who were signed at 18 or younger.
	From the eligible list, each major-league team may protect 15 players
before the draft. So-called 10-and-5 players -- those with 10 years of
major-league service and five straight with the same club -- must be
protected unless they waive that right.
	Players with no-trade contracts must also be protected.
	After a coin flip determines which order the expansion clubs will
select, the teams will alternate choices until each of the existing
teams has lost one player in the first round.
	Then, after each expansion team has drafted 13 players, each American
League team may protect an additional four players while each National
League club may protect another three.
	The Rockies and Marlins will then alternate picks through the second
round, after which each will have a roster of 26 players.
	Before the third and final round of the draft, each AL team will be
allowed to protect yet another four players and each NL team yet another
three.
	During the third round, each NL team will lose one player, and eight
of the fourteen AL teams will lose one -- giving the Rockies and Marlins
10 picks apiece in the round.
	At the end, each expansion club will have selected 36 players. Each
NL team, along with eight AL teams, will have lost three players, while
six AL teams will have lost two players.


    
3.1116AXIS::ROBICHAUDFri Aug 07 1992 15:3311
    	My guess is both owners, no matter how much money they have,
    will not spend big in the free agent market.  They may go after
    a marquee type player to sell tickets, but if they have already
    sold a large number of tickets, they'll pass on the big name.
    These guys have already shelled out big bucks through some type
    of financing and will not be looking to pay out big salaries right
    away.  The expansion clubs will probably draft younger cheaper players
    and hope that the novelty of a new team will carry them with regards
    to ticket sales for the first few years.
    
    				/Don
3.1117SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Aug 07 1992 16:584
       A noter from the Bay area just reported in another conference that
    the SF Giants will announce this afternoon that they're moving to
    Tampa/St Pete. 
                                   Denny
3.1118SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Aug 07 1992 17:003
       Mebbe this will be an out for the Fayster. He cain leave the cubbies
    in the West now!
                                  Denny
3.1119from a friend in the Tampa Bay area - confirmed on CNNACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Aug 07 1992 20:2213
Tampa TV stations and radio are ablaze with a press conference announcing 
the purchace of the SF (nee Tampa Bay)  Giants, moving to the west coast
of Florida for 1993.

According to WFLA, and the press conf at the dome, Lurie (current Giants
owner) has aggreed to the sale, $110,000,000.00. They are even going to
call it 'Giants Dome' !!!

League approval of sale is all that remains .... 

    The Crazy Met
    
3.1120Hey Fay, remember when you said franchise moves aren't healthy?NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 07 1992 20:479
    
    Note to Fay Vincent: this sale is not "in the best interests of the
    game".  I urge you at once to use your powers, as asserted in the
    realignment battle, to nullify it regardless of what decision the 
    National League or all MLB owners make.  "Giants Dome"?  I think I'm
    going to be sick already...
    
    glenn
    
3.1121Just a matter of time...SHALOT::MEDVIDthere is really no-one leftFri Aug 07 1992 20:5312
    Lurie said last week that he was entertaining all offers anywhere since
    the voters had turned him down three times on a new stadium.  Looks
    like he wasn't bluffing.
    
    I see this as good news for Pittsburgh.  Huh?  Well, personally I
    thought for sure that attendance in Pittsburgh (or lack thereof) would
    eventually get the best of the owners and we'd be seeing the St.
    Petersburg Pirates before the year 2000.  With one less market to be
    attractive, that may keep the Pirates in Pittsburgh until at least
    2005.
    
    	--dan'l
3.1122ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Aug 07 1992 22:029
    Whatever the pros and cons of the Giants getting a new stadium, the
    cities in the Bay area certainly had their chance to keep the Giants
    and decided that it was not worth it. Lurie was turned down 4 times.
    
    re: Vincent. Agreed. Except Vincent formulated the guideines under
    which a team could move and the Giants fit all of them.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1123DECWET::METZGERMmmmmmm, Doughnuts.Fri Aug 07 1992 22:4217
How come the Giants don't have a clause in their candlestick lease tying them
to it if they get xxx number of fans or tying Lurie into offering the team to 
local ownership before he moves them...

The SF area fans have shown that they support the team. The Bay area fans 
have indicated that they aren't willing to fork over thier own money to build
a stadium for a millionaire owner when the current one is adequate for the
teams needs. 

If I was Vincent (thank goodness I'm not) I would nix this sale in a second.

Lurie can't demonstrate lack of support for the team. THe only thing he can 
demonstrate is the intelligence of bay area voters....


Metz
3.1124ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Aug 07 1992 22:587
    Metz,
    
    I will buy the argument about the millionaire owner, etc. I will not
    accept that Candlestick is a reasonable ballpark to play in.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1125SAY IT AIN'T SO !!!!WR2FOR::WALSTON_CHLife Has No Finish LineFri Aug 07 1992 23:2832
    
    
         Yeees Siiireeee Sports Fans!!!
    
    
    
        It is, again, a sad day in Bay Area history. Radio KNBR, GAINTS radio, 
     announced today a statement by Bob Laurie that he has sold the giants
    to a Tampa/St. Petey party. Going price 111M.
    
    
         Being a life long Giants fan, I am now officiallly in mourning. I
    have been in "unofficial" mourning since June 2, when the sorry a$$
    voters of San Jose, turned down one of the best offer the city ever had. 
    Before you start getting on my case, I am a San Jose resident, and 
    I VOTE!
    
         I really can not be upset at Bob Laurie, after a decade and 4
    failed stadium ballots,time has run out for the piddley minor league
    cities in the South Bay. After all, baseball is "Big Business", and  
    maybe it is for the better. Time will tell.I know that the Tampa/St. Petey 
    community will welcome them with open arms. But, unfortunately at the 
    expense of other loyal followers. Trust me, loyal fans here breathe 
    Orange and Black.
    
        But still, I can't help but to feel the emptiness. Like the day when 
    Roberto Clemente's plane went down. Not personal enough to be a true 
    tragedy, but I know my life will forever be changed.... 
    
        Chuckers
    
                                 
3.1126Now here's an Option.WR2FOR::WALSTON_CHLife Has No Finish LineFri Aug 07 1992 23:4810
    
    
         RE .1121
    
    
         San Francisco would be a great market for the Pirates. Who knows
    maybe even the Riaders will come back to Oakland.
    
         Chuckers
    
3.1127ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Sat Aug 08 1992 03:532
    Glad I'll get to see a game out there now...
    
3.1128ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Sat Aug 08 1992 04:393
    And Monday to boot... the first game after their road trip after their
    announcement... out to be fun...
    
3.1129SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Aug 10 1992 03:555
       Bring your coat with you Walt. The 'stick cain be brutal in August.
    I can't fault the Giants in this, the stadium is a real hellhole.
    Can't fault the voters either, they're still revovering from the quake.
    Look for the Reds to stay in the West.
                                         Denny
3.1130What baseball is supposed to be. (-:SHARE::DERRYTake your time...hurry up.Mon Aug 10 1992 10:242
    The third base coach for the Braves is gonna need rotator cuff surgery
    from waving all those runs home.  
3.1131CTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Mon Aug 10 1992 15:047
    HAHA Karen,
    Now what's Zim need? Knee surgery? From pleading with the hitters
    to heed his signs whilst on his knees?  Po' Rooster'll need arthro
    also.
    
    MikeL
    
3.1132Times are-a-changin'SALES::THILLMon Aug 10 1992 16:2127
    Well, I guess this means the Cubbies will HAVE to go to the west. With the 
    Giants moving to St Pete they would be in the Eastern Division, and it
    would be a good georgaphical rivalry with the Braves, so the Reds would
    probably have to be the ones to stay in the West.
    
    One (far-fetched) rumor I saw in the Sunday Globe is that they were
    thinking of having the Giants and Milwaukee Brewers switching LEAGUES.
    This would probably never happen; people fuss over the Cubs-Mets and
    other rivalries that still play each other, even if they are in
    different divisions. I can't imagine that they would make it so the
    Dodgers and Giants would only meet in a World Series. If it was, say,
    the Expos, Pardes or a new team joining the AL, maybe, but not a 100+
    year old franchise. 
    
    On the other hand, it would make sense from a regional point of view.
    The Southeast would have 2 NL teams (Braves, Marlins) and Tampa Bay in
    the AL. Every other region is balanced with no more than one extra team
    from either league except the upper midwest - Twins, WSox, Brewers in
    the AL and Cubs in the NL. Now if the Braves had stayed in Milwaukee
    and the AL got Atlanta, this wouldn't be a problem. How bout the Giants
    move to Milwaukee and stay in the NL, and the Brewers go to the new
    group in Tampa Bay and stay in the AL? Unless one team has a ton of
    prospects on the farm or some other hidden asset, it really shouldn't
    matter which team winds up where.
    
    Tom 
    the AL
3.1133Baseball tradition and stability dead?NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Aug 10 1992 17:0339
    I can't see the NL giving up what is certain to be a big money-making 
    franchise (at least in the short term) in the Tampa Bay Giants for the 
    very ordinary Milwaukee franchise.  Tampa Bay is going to be selling out
    that ridiculous wedge-shaped dome of theirs for years to come, and that 
    benefits the visiting clubs as well as the home team.
    
    Why is Candlestick Park considered such a hell-hole, or "the worst park
    in baseball" as Peter Gammons puts it?  Apparently someone forgot to tell
    the approximate 2 million fans a year who were showing up as late as
    1990 when the Giants were at least putting an average ballclub on the
    field (or if they did tell them, the fans didn't seem to care, and that's
    all that should-- but doesn't-- matter to baseball).  I've been to the 
    Stick on a few occasions and I can say that I'd rather see a ballgame 
    there than at any of the domed stadiums in baseball, or the cookie-cutters 
    in Pittsburgh and Cincinnati and St. Louis, or even Shea Stadium, for that 
    matter.  Sure, the weather can be harsh, but this is really only by 
    California standards.  I was there on one of the supposedly "unbearable" 
    windy nights and, in my opinion, the weather in general is not nearly as 
    bad as at the outdoor parks in the east in April and most of May. 
    
    I think this issue isn't really about Bob Lurie being cheap or about
    the Bay Area politicians being intransigent, but rather once again 
    about baseball's economic situation regarding small markets/small TV 
    contracts/small supplemental income sources.  I don't doubt that Bob 
    Lurie can't make money in the current situation in San Francisco, but 
    I'm also not convinced that baseball presented the Bay Area communities 
    with reasonable and fair stadium proposals.  As TV income plummets in 
    the 1990s, I look for more of these moves to take place, and the fans 
    of the smaller cities, who in hard times aren't willing to hand over 
    their wallets, to take the blame from Fay Vincent and company.  
    
    Baseball needs to share its own wealth before it asks the fans in its 
    smaller markets for fork over theirs, or any sense of tradition 
    surrounding these cities and their ballclubs will be lost to whomever 
    is willing to put up the short-term bucks...
    
    glenn
      
3.1134 The only tradition is $$$$$$SALES::THILLMon Aug 10 1992 17:3424
    -1
    Yeah, I can't see it happening either, but for the Tampa group, what's
    the difference between one team over another? Seems to me that the
    "value" in a baseball team comes from things like being a large market
    team (with a big local TV contract), being a "traditional team" like
    the Red Sox and Fenway Park, etc., or being a successful team on the
    field (for the short run, since this changes all the time). By moving
    to a dome in the Sunbelt, the Red Sox would immediately lose all
    "traditional" value; they would be the AL's Astros.
    
    With a lot of these cities that have become border-line big league in
    the last 20 years, they would be happy with any MLB team. Did the folks
    in Indy care that the Dolts sip? No, becsue they are now OUR Colts, and
    that makes Indian-no-place that much more of a major league city. St
    Pete would have been happy with the White Sox of Mariners, so what do
    they care if they get the Brewers and if the Giants go to Milwaukee? Way
    hypothetical, of course, and I know it won't happen. As for the NL
    wanting the lurative market in Florida, good point. But it effectively
    makes the entire Southeast NL country, where the AL doesn't have a
    frachies between Baltimore, Texas and Kansas City. Likewise, the NL
    will only have only the Colorado Rockies between St Louis/Chicago and LA, 
    where the AL will have several teams.
    
    Tom      
3.1135FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Aug 10 1992 17:3612
    I'll echo what Glenn said about the Stick and in fact, I'd take most of
    it over Fenway Park.  It's more accessable driving, it's newer and it's
    right next to the ocean.  It has no subway going nearby but it's got
    lots of bus service coming out of SF and plenty of parking.  I liked
    the Stick.
    
    I don't really understand why the Giants felt they had to move either.
    
    I think a big part of the problem was that the Bay Area market probably
    couldn't support two teams for any length of time.
    
    John
3.1136SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Aug 10 1992 18:4314
    
    re a few back from Glenn,
    
    I bleieve the Giants only drew 2 mil one year, and that was
    during/immediately after a pennant year.  Although their fans enjoyed
    mocking the A's and their fans, they didn't support the team as well as
    the A's' (that'll throw Hendry into a lather) fans did.  I also think
    they had too much competition from the other attractions of the Bay
    Area.  THere is simply so much to do there that baseball drops down on
    the list.
    
    Brews 
    
    
3.1137FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Aug 10 1992 19:118
    I'm pretty mellow about apostrophes now.  Actually, if I were writing
    it, I'd have written "... the Oakland fans ..." which solves the
    problem cleanly and neatly.
    
    A little bit wordier but also correct would have been " ... the fans of
    the Athletics..."
    
    John
3.1138Of course if the Giants move the A's become a big-market teamNAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Aug 10 1992 19:1231
    > I bleieve the Giants only drew 2 mil one year, and that was
    > during/immediately after a pennant year.  Although their fans enjoyed
    > mocking the A's and their fans, they didn't support the team as well as
    > the A's' (that'll throw Hendry into a lather) fans did.  I also think
    > they had too much competition from the other attractions of the Bay
    > Area.  THere is simply so much to do there that baseball drops down on
    > the list.
    
    But Brews, can you tell us what the A's attendance was like before they
    became a powerhouse?  Do you remember 1980 when the A's set some kind
    of a modern-day record for woeful support, with less than a half million 
    fans?  Ten years ago it was the A's who were in dire straits, and both 
    these teams have taken turns over the years flirting with the fateful 
    move.  Maybe the area can't support more than one team, but it's my 
    contention that when you factor in the relative successes of the teams 
    (anyone can support a winner, except maybe Pittsburgh, alas) the Giants 
    have been supported as well as and probably better than the A's.  Of
    course Bob Lurie has never been a Walter Haas Jr. when it comes to
    surrounding himself with good baseball people, the Giants have not been 
    able to match the A's on the field, and good intentions don't pay the
    bills.  
    
    My question is whether the survival of all the small-market teams will 
    depend on their performance over short stretches (hell, the Giants just 
    won the pennant three years ago but have since collapsed on the field). 
    Sports can't work that way, because half the teams are always going to
    be losers...
    
    glenn
    
3.1139Not as big a market as originally thoughtSALES::THILLMon Aug 10 1992 19:2313
    The Giants were the only team in the area until 1968. The A's had some
    really good teams in the early '70s and won a division as late as 1975.
    The Giants were not doing so hot, and were well on their way to becoming 
    the "Toronto Giants" around 1975 or so. The A's hit the bottom after
    most of their stars were traded or left via free agency, and Marvin
    Davis was just about to move them to Denver. They have rebounded and
    become one of the top franchises, while the Giants have dipped from
    their 1989 team.
    
    It seems to me that one or the other has been in trouble most of the
    time. Maybe the area really CAN only support one team...
    
    Tom 
3.1140SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Aug 10 1992 19:3014
    re ':  But I enjoyed the challenge of being able to [correctly] type 
    "A's'."  And you lent me another opportunity.  8^)
    
    re Giants-A's: I believe the A's drew well in '87 (more than 2 mil) and
    possibly even back to '85, as the team was getting put together. 
    Clearly the A's have had the better baseball people (i.e. Sandy
    Alderson), which has led to their success on and off the field.  Also,
    keep in mind that the major population center of the area is closer to
    Candlestick and there is more $ on that side of the Bay.  Of
    course, if T was still here I'd say it was all due to LaRussa amd
    McGwire.  8^) 
    
    Brews
      
3.1141ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Aug 10 1992 20:325
    The A's drew very badly in 1972-1974 when they were winning 3 WS in a
    row.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1142SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelMon Aug 10 1992 20:401
    ...and had one of the worst owners in the history of MLB.
3.1143PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Aug 10 1992 21:101
    Surely you aren't referring to Charlie Finley, are you Brews?
3.1144SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Aug 11 1992 11:585
       Glenn, you don't actually consider SF a 'small market' do you? They
    draw off of a pretty big area out there. So. Bay, East Bay, Marin
    County, Santa Cruz etc. There may be 2 teams but they're in different
    leagues.
                                        Denny
3.1145CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Tue Aug 11 1992 12:2610
Heard the mayor of SF is trying to get a group together to keep the Giants
in SF.

I hope it happens, and Tampa/St. Pete, one of those noveau Southern Whore
towns, gets to live with a dome that's home to Ice Capades and tractor pulls.

All these Southern whiney "We want a pro team" towns should just start 
their own league....

JD
3.11468-)SHALOT::MEDVIDSeasick, yet still dockedTue Aug 11 1992 12:4611
>All these Southern whiney "We want a pro team" towns should just start 
>their own league....
    
    As soon as all those northern states stop whining about high taxes and
    cost of living and start their own country.  Meanwhile, the south will
    keep carrying the USA through the recession.
    
    If it weren't for Digital and IBM down here, you'd never know there was
    a recession or a boob in the white house.
    
    	--dan'l
3.1147ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 11 1992 12:498
    
    dan'l
    
    I am disappointed in you, forgetting your roots and defending the
    South. What is this world coming to? :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1148My life is taking roots dahn heyah nowSHALOT::MEDVIDSeasick, yet still dockedTue Aug 11 1992 13:0013
    
    Give me $1.50 admission to a minor league game where you can sit 10
    rows from the field, watching guys who are worried more about the next
    pitch rather than the next paycheck, talking for a spell with the beer
    man.
    
    I go to more games in a summer in the south than I've ever been to at
    Three Rivers.  
    
    Now pro football is a different matter entirely.  I want an NFL team!
    Whine!  Whine!  Whine!
    
    	--dan'l
3.1149CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityTue Aug 11 1992 13:0318
Whoa, whoa people!

Let's not forget that while we all may be proud of where we came from,
or where we're living, we're all still on big ol' country (with a boob
in the White House 8^))

This is not meant to disparage noters in here who don't live in the USA,
it's just to keep the war between the states from erupting again.....


Personally, I've never been to Florida.  I don't know what the folks
are like, but if they're anything like the folks I met in South Carolina,
or the people I know from Alabama or Louisiana, then they're okay.

If they're not, well, hell, let 'em start their own league!  8^)


Chainsaw for Frank_the_Moderator
3.1150CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityTue Aug 11 1992 13:0517
>    Give me $1.50 admission to a minor league game where you can sit 10
>    rows from the field, watching guys who are worried more about the next
>    pitch rather than the next paycheck, talking for a spell with the beer
>    man.
    
YOu get the tickets, I'll start driving NOW.


I hear you buddy.  With the New Britain Red Sox just a little ways away
(and a slightly higher ticket price) I know exactly where you are coming
from.

To see a bunch of players playing their heart out trying to make it to
The Show is, IMO, some of the BEST baseball you can see......


'Saw
3.1151Compare revenues minus gate receipts and it's small...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 11 1992 13:1316
    
    > Glenn, you don't actually consider SF a 'small market' do you? They
    > draw off of a pretty big area out there. So. Bay, East Bay, Marin
    > County, Santa Cruz etc. There may be 2 teams but they're in different
    > leagues.
    
    It's hard to come up with an all-encompassing definition of "small
    market", but as far as baseball economics are concerned, the Bay Area 
    (with two teams in it) is definitely one of them.  Both teams have lousy
    TV deals, for starters.  One thing that surprised me when I was out
    there was that even if you have pay cable you can't be guaranteed that
    a particular game will be on the tube, something that's unheard of in
    Boston, New York, Chicago...
    
    glenn
    
3.1152GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseTue Aug 11 1992 13:3817
    re: Minor League Baseball
    
    I know just what you mean. I was in the Niagra Falls area last week and
    saw two games, one at Skydome and one at Pilot Field in Buffalo. While
    Skydomw was impressive (the roof opened while we were there), I
    prefered the Bisons/Nashville Sounds game to the Blue Jays/Yankees
    game. The park is much more intimate (you can see the game without
    binoculars) and the players are nicer to my kids. The players in the
    minors will actually talk to the kids and give autographs, something
    that the big leaguers seldom do. Also, the stadiums have much more
    character and give me the feeling of being a safer place for my kids.
    The only big league park with the same kind of feel that I've been to
    are Wrigley Field and Camden Yards. I'd prefer going to Reading Stadium
    or Duncan Park Stadium (Spartanburg) to watch those versions of the
    Phillies that go to the Vet, which is a concrete toilet bowl.
    
    Dennisf 
3.1153Too bad T isn't here to learn a lessonSHALOT::MEDVIDSeasick, yet still dockedTue Aug 11 1992 13:5013
    BTW, this debate never should have errupted.  I should have pointed out
    a fundamental error in JD's note...
    
    Florida is not considered "the south."  It's kind of it's own little
    world below its panhandle.  Only by geographical rules is it "the
    south" but it is far far different when it comes to people, way of
    life, and attitude.
    
    Now if the Giants do move to Florida, I suggest they change their name
    to the St. Pete Polyesters.  You could probably buy white leather belts
    and shoes, and plastic nose covers at the souvenier stand.
    
    	--dan'l
3.1154Whole lotsa folk got forebears that're RebsCTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Aug 11 1992 13:596
    Oh I dunno dan'l,
    I'll give ya South Florida, but say that to anyone mid-state and up,
    and you're liable to start an internecine southron war.
    
    MikeL
    
3.1155Miami is at least the native Cubans' team...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 11 1992 14:486
    
    Tampa/St Pete certainly qualifies under "transplanted northerners"
    country.  Prob'ly worse than south Florida, even...
    
    glenn
    
3.1156local afflictionHBAHBA::HAASHead down FrogmanTue Aug 11 1992 14:506
>    Tampa/St Pete certainly qualifies under "transplanted northerners"
>    country.  Prob'ly worse than south Florida, even...

Hail, we got that problem here in Charlotte... 

TTom
3.1157HAHAHAHA TTomCTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Tue Aug 11 1992 15:161
    
3.1158MCIS2::DHAMELJack Clark: Will DH for foodTue Aug 11 1992 15:178
    
    The South shall rise again!
    
    
    Eh, maybe not.
    
    Dickstah
       
3.1159great p-name Dickstah!JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Aug 11 1992 15:221
    
3.1160CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Tue Aug 11 1992 16:0717
Dan'l -

I'm sure real southerners don't consider the noveau-riche, transplanted
northerners living in areas like RTP as the real south, either.   

Anyway, I have no compassion for these cities that build a stadium, and then
like a cheap harlot open their kimono, trying to lure anyone with a pro
team to their lair.

Tampa/St. Pete will get on the casting couch with anyone to try and get a 
team.

They didn't get an expansion team, so they are being whiney little brats.  
Tough crap.   Let the SunCoast Dome or whatever it is turn into a geriatrics
batting cage for all I care.

JD
3.1161Big price for a part-time facilitySALES::THILLTue Aug 11 1992 16:1522
    Just to get back on track, the whole issue here is that St Pete built
    the dome a few years ago when they thought they were going to get the
    White Sox, tried to get the Mariners, and now the Giants. They don't
    care which MLB team it is as long as it is A_team. BTW, can anyone say
    for sure that this is a done deal? People in SF are still trying to
    hang on, but is it considered fait acompli cuz Vincent outlined
    criteria for franchise moves, and the Giants meet them? 
    
    The dome is a huge white elephant. There are only so many tractor pulls
    and concerts they can stage there. With the Bucs playing in perfectly
    adequate (and larger) Tampa Stadium, no way they'd get them as a
    tennant either. I dunno if the NHL's Lightning will be playing there,
    but they better learn how to make an adequate ice surface if they do. 
    Maybe the Orlando Magic could be presuaded to have a few (exhibition) 
    games there as well.
    
    Too bad for the taxpayers of the Tampa/St.Pete area, but I guess that's
    the price for wanting so desperately to be a "big league" city. For
    every Tampa Bay there's 10 other major league wannabee cities. Where
    does it stop?
    
    Tom
3.1162Bob Hunt, tooHBAHBA::HAASHead down FrogmanTue Aug 11 1992 16:2211
>Dan'l -
>
>I'm sure real southerners don't consider the noveau-riche, transplanted
>northerners living in areas like RTP as the real south, either.   

JD,

Whatcha asking Dan'l for? He ain't no southerner. I don't know about the
noveau or the riche part but he definitely a transplant.

TTom
3.1163PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollTue Aug 11 1992 16:235
    JD, I'm surprised you are/were a Mariner supporter.  Afterall, Seattle
    was a noveau big league wannabe city at one time.  In fact, they showed
    they couldn't hack it, the team moved out,  so they threatened to sue
    MLB unless they were awarded an expansion franchise the next time
    around.
3.1164OuchSHALOT::HUNTHeartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay GinTue Aug 11 1992 16:2729
3.1165JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasTue Aug 11 1992 16:548
    Anyone else catch Ken Patterson's wild pitch in yesterday's Cubs-Expos
    game?
    
    For those who didn't see it, he threw a pitch way high and outside
    while *intentionally walking* Spike Owen!!!  
    
    
    py
3.1167Tampa Bay is already sick of the Buccaneers...NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Aug 11 1992 17:1127
    
> You are right that they made a business decision to build the Sun Coast
> Dome and that it could backfire in their faces and you're right that they
> don't deserve compassion along a business line.   But I don't think they
> were total whores in this venture any more than you or I wouldn't be if we
> tried to sell ourselves and our skills and services.
    
    This analogy only works if you truly believe that there is absolutely
    nothing special about baseball, that it is exclusively a business and is
    subject to all the same forces as any other business, that there is no
    premium placed on fan loyalty or tradition and the identification of an
    individual team with an individual city.  That's a legitimate point of 
    view to take; it's just one that I don't particularly agree with, being 
    an ex-Baltimore Colts fan (are the Colts and the NFL really better off 
    now with the team in Indy?-- I for one can strongly identify with the 
    prostitution metaphor, starring Bob Irsay as chief pimp on the block).
    
    Taking the business argument one further, it might make financial sense
    to rotate franchises around the country based on the short-term
    economic conditions.  The team is going poorly in one city, and an
    artificial economic boost is needed?  Move the team down the road and
    rake it in for five years or so, and when that city gets sick of the
    team, pack it up and move on again... 
    
    glenn                                
    
    
3.1168MIMS::ROLLINS_RTue Aug 11 1992 17:389
>    Taking the business argument one further, it might make financial sense
>    to rotate franchises around the country based on the short-term
>    economic conditions.  The team is going poorly in one city, and an
>    artificial economic boost is needed?  Move the team down the road and
>    rake it in for five years or so, and when that city gets sick of the
>    team, pack it up and move on again... 
    
     And what is wrong with this idea, if that is what the ownership decides
     to do, and that is what the market demands be done ?
3.1169CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Tue Aug 11 1992 20:497
Bob -

St Pete tried for a franchise (expansion), I believe.  They didn't get one.
So ever since then, they've been willing to go to bed with anyone that
vaguely sniffs of money.

JD
3.1170ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Tue Aug 11 1992 20:589
    JD
    
    If they were willing to take an expansion team then why shouldn't
    they go after an established team. Who says that San Francisco has a
    god given right to a baseball team.  And about going after everone who
    vaguely sniffs of money, I think you have that reversed, TB is the one
    giving the money - more or less.
    
    The Crazy Met
3.1171It's called "capitalism", amigoSHALOT::HUNTHeartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay GinTue Aug 11 1992 21:5013
3.1172CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 12:1917
Boy, you guys sure have 'warm and fuzzy' feelings.

Face it, they are acting like spoiled brats.  They LOST at their chance.  And
they've snapped.

They are like the old trenchcoat-clad old man, in one hand a bag of money
that it throws like bread to seagulls, hoping one gets close enough to snag
for dinner, and in the other hand, a bag of money like candy, the better to
entice a poor youngin' into the woods.

Nah, this isn't like us with Microsoft, or like folks with resumes and suits.
This is a city acting like a baby.

Then again, it already has the mindset of the perfect modern-day ballplayer -
whiney, money-grubbing, no loyalty.  So perhaps its a perfect fit.

JD
3.1173CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityWed Aug 12 1992 12:2315
> So what ???   What do you call our "courtship dance" with Microsoft ???  
> We have the networking technologies they want and they have the customer
> base we want.   It's a classic case of two corporate "whores" doing it in
> every single position they can think of in every room in the house.
 
Gee, I'd like to do a little gushing over the importance of courtship
rituals in the social development of Man, but the first thing that came
to mind was

	"Wow, an electronic Kama Sutra"

8^)


'Saw
3.1174PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 13:336
3.1175could happen...PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 13:373
    We all know the world would end should the Cubbies ever meet the Red
    Sox in the World Series, but what would happen should the World Series
    be held entirely in Canada?
3.1176FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Wed Aug 12 1992 14:2310
    If they're going to be consistent, they shouldn't play the Star
    Spangled Banner at all since those will be both Canadian teams.  No one
    in MLB plays O Canada when either the Expos or Jays are not there.  No
    NHL team in Canada plays the Star Spangled Banner when it's an
    all-Canadian matchup.  The only US NHL city that plays O Canada when
    there's not a Canadian team playing is Buffalo.
    
    I'm dead serious on this one.  O Canada only pregame.
    
    John
3.1177CSOA1::BACHYou are so sly, but so am I...Wed Aug 12 1992 16:021
    Makes sense to me.
3.1178Gotta live in the real world though!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 16:153
       Money grubbing athletes, money grubbing owners, money grubbing
    cities!! Ah, to be as young and innocent as JD!
                                      Denny
3.1179ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 16:184
    Denny you only want to be as young as JD because of your advanced age.
    
    The Crayz Met
    
3.1180Money, money, money ...SHALOT::HUNTHeartbreak Motor Oil and Bombay GinWed Aug 12 1992 16:3024
3.1181SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 16:347
 >   Denny you only want to be as young as JD because of your advanced age.
 >   
 >   The Crayz Met
      
    Yeah, well that too craze. 
    It's just that JD seems to be whining about the whiners lately.
                               Denny
3.1182CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 16:5811
Bob -
Actually, all I hope is that Tampa/St Pete NEVER gets a team.  Ever.  Be the
funniest thing in the world.  I understand business.  I just wish they'd
stop smooching with everyone, shut up, and bid on the next franchise.  Maybe
they should try to get something the population would enjoy - like a 
pro shuffleboard team.

Personally, I hope any city that builds a stadium without a team falls flat
on its face.   Nothing gives me a thigh shudderer than that.

JD
3.1183CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityWed Aug 12 1992 17:051
"If you build it, they will come"
3.1184PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 17:1218
3.1185CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 17:3819
Mac,

First off, Florida has a baseball team. The Marlins.  St Pete lost out, and
they are doing something I guess you value.  Oh, and last time I looked, the
Giants aren't an expansion team, which is what I meant about bidding on the
next franchise.

I doubt you'd have the same attitude if it was the Sox who were being wooed
by this tawdry sireen of  the south.

The Mariners were a long time ago.  I don't know the whole story, and I'm
not a Mariners fan. Sure, I followed them out of closeness, but I haven't 
watched or paid attention to them since I left Seattle.  The fact they have
a dumb dome doesn't enamor them to me.

So Mac.  You seem like an honorable dude.  What's the great honorable thing
Tampa St. Bleat is doing?

JD
3.1186PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 17:4918
3.1187ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 17:527
    JD 
    
    The heck with honorable. The real question is what are they doing that
    is so dishonorable??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1188CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 18:0711
TCM -

They are being babies.  They aren't accepting that they weren't GOOD enough
to get a team awarded to them via the normal channels - expansion.  

Tampa St. Bleat is like the spoilt rich kid who tries to buy friends with
his daddies money, but gets rejected after the intial contact, when its realized
that this snotty-nosed brat is nothing more than a shallow sore on the face
mankind.

JD
3.1189ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 18:127
    Tampa Bay went after a team before the expansion process, see Mariners
    and White Sox. They did not get an expansion team because the NL
    decided that at the time Miami and Denver better fit their plans.
    Basically you are saying if you don't get something you want the first
    time around then quit trying. Maybe you do that JD, most of us don't.
    
    The Crazy Met
3.1190PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 18:139
3.1191SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 18:144
       what is this aversion liberals have to anyone making money!!? Since
    when is everyone a charitable outfit? You're whining more than they did
    JD.
                                   Denny
3.1192CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityWed Aug 12 1992 18:1810
Boy, you KNOW that the sports world has to be in that utterly boring
August phase (too far past the all-star game, the series is a ways away,
and football ain't started yet), if all we can come up with in here
for debate is whether or not Tampa is okay for wanting the Giants......


It's a SAD day in SPORTS.....


'Saw
3.1193SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 18:202
       Nah, it's a NORMAL day in SPORTS!!
                                   Denny
3.1194CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 18:309
Denny -

First off, I have absolutely no idea where the liberals/money thing came from.

I have yet to mention, in any note, that it is bad to make money.  Never.

Bark up another tree.

JD
3.1195CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 18:3418
TCM -

I'm not saying you should give up after the first try.  If I was that sort
of person, I never would have run track in high school or college.  

I just don't agree with Sleazy Cities going after established franchises 
because they are wanna-be's.  It's a pretty yuppie thing to do, which is
why I suspect everyone in here is so into it.

So I guess that all that really matters is if a city has a money, builds a
stadium, then they have the right to get a pro franchise no matter what.  

Personally, I hope LUrie loses, the Giants stay, athe St. Bleaters go slithering
down another alley, going from gin mill to gin mill, waving their smelly wares
in the face of greasy owners looking for a cheap thrill.  And in the end, all
I hope is St. Bleat gets a nice big open sore that seeps through its overcoat.

JD
3.1196SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 18:353
       This whole thing's about money. That's the basic reason SF is
    moving.
                                     Denny
3.1197CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 18:366
But Denny, why do you assume that people that you have a need to label 
with a stereotype like Liberal, don't want to make money.  Hell, I know
many of those you would label that way who are savvy business folks and
make it hand over fist.

JD
3.1198SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 18:3814
>     <<< Note 3.1169 by CUPMK::DEVLIN "Je voudrais boire quelque chose." >>>
>
>Bob -
>
>St Pete tried for a franchise (expansion), I believe.  They didn't get one.
>So ever since then, they've been willing to go to bed with anyone that
>vaguely sniffs of money.
>
>JD
     
    What's that you said a couple notes back JD? Are you going to make me
    look for others or is this enough?
                               Denny
     
3.1199ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 18:3916
    JD,
    
    Let me get this straight, you are saying either:
    
    1) Lurie should be thankful he can own a Major League baseball team.
    Since he is so priviliged how dare he seek to find a stadium that is
    a reasonable place to play baseball.
    
    or (I hope)
    
    2) Lurie has a right to sell his team even if it will be moved, as long
    as he does not sell it to a group that will move it to Tampa Bay. If
    they wanted to move the team to Charlotte that would be ok.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1200PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 18:428
3.1201CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 18:4313
TCM -

Is that what it is really about?  Or is it about Lurie trying to blackmail
the locals into building him a new stadium?  is it about Lurie trying to play
off the suiters to get the best deal for him, and not giving a damn about
SF, TB, the fans or the Giants, themselves?

Is it about St. Bleat playing Suzie Tawdry because they built a vile dome taht
they can't find a team to play in?

Maybe Lurie will pull a Bob Irsay - that should get you all pretty wooden.

JD
3.1202PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 18:447
3.1203SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 18:453
       Obviously if the Giants don't wanna play in SF they shoulda gone out
    of business, or moved to Nashua, because they never begged for a team.
                                    Denny
3.1204SF wants to have their cake and eat it too!ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 18:4815
    JD
    
    Look at what is happening in SF now. Lurie finally decided to sell and
    now the folks in SF are falling over themselves to do something to keep
    the Giants in town. Lurie stated that if the Giants have to continue
    playing at Candlestick then they will leave town. The people out in the
    SF Bay area did a cost/benefit analysis and decided that it would be
    less costly for them to lose the Giants then to somehow figure out a
    way to get a new stadium built. For the moment I am giving Lurie the
    benefit of the doubt. If it becomes clear that he is using this TB
    thing as a bargaining chip I will then consider him to be a real sleazy
    businessman.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1205Surely not a firstCTHQ::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Wed Aug 12 1992 18:5015
    Can anyone draw some relevant parallels if any/
    
    What about these moves
    
    Philadelphia A's to KC
    St. Loius Browns to Baltimore (Orioles)
    Chicago Cardinals to St.Louis to Phoenix
    Syracuse Nats to Philly to SF Warriors
    
    ETC.
    
    Are these situations so dissimilar to St.Pete/SF?/
    
    MikeL
    
3.1206CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 18:527
Mac -

I'd hope even you would see a vein of humour in the shuffleboard line.

And I stand on my stance concerning Denny's line.

JD
3.1207ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 18:569
    re: .1205
    
    I'm a bit fuzzy on the move of the footbal St. Louis Cardinals to
    Phoenix but it certainly had to do with fan support, stadium terms, and
    stuff like that. Similar to Giantsmove but Giants probably have gotten
    more fan support.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1208GIAMEM::LEFEBVREI brake for tailgatersWed Aug 12 1992 19:038
    JD, yuppies in St. Pete?
    
    Har-har....
    
    "Yo Biff, please be a sport and pass me some of that pureed banana and
    try not to tear your depends on my new wheelchair."
    
    Mark.
3.1209SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 19:052
       Lufay's right, all the Yups are down so. watchin' the 'canes!
                                     Denny
3.1210GIAMEM::LEFEBVREI brake for tailgatersWed Aug 12 1992 19:143
    Denny....
    
    oD em!
3.1211PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 19:325
3.1212Tampa/St. Bleat? Rollward!NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Aug 12 1992 19:3532
                                  
    JD's not alone in this.  Some things, including stability and tradition
    in baseball, should be above the short-term bucks.  I know that's not
    being realistic with our society as it is today; I admit to that.  No 
    one ever said that we baseball idealists have to agree with something 
    just because it's so.
    
    I've already seen Spud write in the BASEBALL conference that if it
    weren't for some local businessmen artificially supporting the Twins to
    protect their investment in the Metrodome they were gone in the early
    80's, and we look up and now they're one of the more successful
    franchises going.  The Chicago White Sox were headed out, which would
    have been an absolute travesty, but now they're fine (yes, I know, it
    took capitulation to one of the greediest ownerships in the history of 
    sports to accomplish this).  
    
    Seems to me that even fans of a franchise as mighty as the New York Mets 
    would have had no complaint if the team had packed it up and moved out 
    about ten years ago, citing these wholesome and meritorious "economic 
    conditions".  After all, they were playing in a lousy stadium, in front 
    of piddling non-supportive crowds of around 5000 fans, in a city that 
    was broke and which had no desire to accomodate ownership.  So what if 
    that ownership was imcompetent and cheap and stupid enough to trade 
    away the only real legend in franchise history for a bag of beans.  
    Those ingrate Mets fans *proved* that they didn't deserve a team because
    the owners couldn't make a buck.
    
    Look at the lowest point in your own team's history and see if you're
    as sympathetic to a potential franchise move...
    
    glenn
    
3.1213PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 19:384
3.1214CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 19:418
Mac -

But I agree with Glenn.  So what do you know?

If teh St. Bleaters don't get the Giants, what franchise is next in their

"Land A Franchise Lambada?"

JD
3.1215CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityWed Aug 12 1992 19:423
Po' JD!


3.1216They sure didn't care about NFL rules or Maryland court orders...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Aug 12 1992 19:4514
3.1217PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 19:535
3.1218ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 20:0524
    re: .1212
    
    Back in the doldrum days of the late 1970's and very early 1980's you
    are absolutely right about the Mets. I am sympathetic to the Giants
    fans. But all these last ditch efforts to keep the Giants in town is
    the real cynical part around this whole move. It appears the people in
    SF simply did not believe a very straight forward statement: If
    Candlestick is the place where the Giants have to play then the team
    will be sold and bidders from outside the area will be seriously
    considered. Now they are faced with reality and don't like it.
    Only reason the White Sox and Twins stayed was because their demands
    were met. The Giants demands were not met, and they people in the area
    were given many chances. I am not taking sides whether or not the
    people in the area did or did not do the right thing. But they made a
    choice and now they don't want to live with it.
    
    re: stability and tradition
    
    That ended when the Dodgers and Giants dumped on NY and headed out to
    California. Now the shoe is on the other foot and these same folks are
    yelling bloody murder.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1219CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Aug 12 1992 20:0612
M ac -

There's plenty of blame to go around.  But Tampa/St. Bleat is starting to 
be like a tired old Hooker.  Everytime you drive down the street, there
she is, all made up with glossy makeup and support pantyhose, trying to
get someone to take a peak under her dome.  And just as Jeff Smulyan before 
him, Lurie deserves some blame.  But the prescense of a St.Bleat, which will
spread em with ease, makes it that much easier for a Lurie to run away, pointing
a finger at the present hometown, while pointing in a different manner 
towards the geritol gams of The Bleat-town.

JD
3.1220GIAMEM::LEFEBVREI brake for tailgatersWed Aug 12 1992 20:133
    Leave Gams out of this!
    
    Mark.
3.1221SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Aug 12 1992 20:2111
    
    I think the people of the Bay Area believed Lurie from the beginning,
    understood his problem, but in general, felt there are bigger things to
    worry about, so they are saying "adios!"  The people complaining are in
    the vast minority, and few are holding Lurie to blame, wh has done
    everything he can to keepp the team in SF (including buying it).
    
    JD's metaphors are getting tiresome.  At least T's were original and
    reasonably on target.
    
    Brews
3.1222SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesWed Aug 12 1992 20:263
       Rat on Brews, at least T's hookers had festering sores. JD's are
    just whiney.
                                   Denny
3.1223PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Aug 12 1992 20:4213
3.1224CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityWed Aug 12 1992 20:456
Speaking of festering sores, is that particular gem in THIS notesfile?

I'd love to pull that baby for posterity......


'Saw
3.1225DECWET::METZGERMmmmmmm, Doughnuts.Wed Aug 12 1992 21:1619
Personally I think that any team that is for sale should have a 3 month window 
where they are available for local ownership only. If local ownership can not
be found in that time period then they can consider moving to another town 
under present ownership or selling to ownership that would move them.

Would Lurie be doing this if Tampa / Saint Pete weren't already prepared to
welcome him with open arms? If they didn't have a vacant dome wasting away
would the area be so quick to solicit other teams?

How much would it cost to build an adequate stadium for the Giants? I'm not 
talking 9th wonder of the world like Skydome or such like. Just a nice outdoor
stadium seating 40 to 45K or so. How much did Camden Yards cost to build?

I think Tampa made a big mistake putting the cart before the horse and now
they are trying to avoid running over the cart with the horse by soliciting
any and all teams to come out there...

Metz
3.1226SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Aug 12 1992 21:333
    
    Lurie gave Sf much more than 90 days.  He's given them at least 5-6
    years.
3.1227ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Wed Aug 12 1992 21:3410
    re: .1225
    
    That is a pretty good idea. It nicely balances the interests of the
    local fans and the owner.
    
    I suspect that Lurie would be doing this no matter what, it so happens
    that the Tampa Bay situation makes it easier for him to do.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1228DECWET::METZGERMmmmmmm, Doughnuts.Wed Aug 12 1992 21:354
Not since he announced the team was for sale...

Metz
3.1229SOLANA::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Aug 12 1992 21:589
    
    He announced that the team was for sale YEARS ago.  No one local would
    step up and buy it, with the stadium situation the way it is.  After
    the San Jose deal fell threw, he said he'd entertain ALL offers, and
    take the first reasonable one.
    
    
    Brews
    
3.1230SALEM::TIMMONSWhere's Waldo?Thu Aug 13 1992 10:5718
    I don't understand why so many are upset of this situation.
    
    Isn't this the American way?  If someone "owns" something, and then
    decides to either sell or move, or both, and it's happened in every
    major sport, then what's the big deal over this particular situation?
    
    I don't know St. Pete from St. Louis, so the particular location
    doesn't interest or bother me in the least.  Business is business.
    
    Let's also remember that high salaries are the reason that so many
    teams are now in financial straits.  I won't say they are in danger of
    failing, but certainly attendance does have a bigger impact on the
    financial statement that in years past.  TV market is a major issue,
    too.  But, to the owner, it's his investment and the bottom line that
    are, for most owners, the key to any move or sale.  Again, the 'Merican
    way.
    
    Lee
3.1231CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Aug 13 1992 12:1226
    
    Well, maybe I should change my stance.  Make the Brews happy.  Make Mac
    happy.
    
    I now think that all the existing franchises should be moved to newer,
    sexier towns. Places that want a pro team and don't have one.
    
    I mean some of these cities have had a team for 50-100 years or more!
    Time for a change.   Let some new places get teams.   It should match
    the rest of America.  Like Lee said.   Have them move from the rust
    belt and the north to the south, teh south west.    Yep.  That's what
    would be great.
    
    Phoenix should have a baseball team.  El Paso.  Memphis.   New Orleans.
    Charlotte.  Raleigh.  Gainsville.   ALbuqueque. Las Vegas.  Sun City.
    Austin.   Mobile.  Little Rock.
    
    It's getting pretty boring having the same teams and cities year in, 
    year out!  San Fran, LA< Boston, Chicago, New York, Philly - BORING!
    
    Yep, that's what should happen. It's the AMerican way.   
    
    And, I didn't use any metaphors, so I can keep poor ol' Brews happy,
    and maybe not tire him.
    
    JD
3.1232FSOA::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Thu Aug 13 1992 12:3239
    Lurie isn't up and moving the team.  He's selling the team because he
    can't make a profit with it.  While perhaps a semantic difference only,
    I think it's an important distinction to make.
    
    I'm no big fan of team ownership on any level and in fact as you well
    know work for a team whose future in New England is by no means
    guaranteed.  I believe the team is doing everything it can to stay here
    but I certainly don't expect it to stay here if it's not being
    supported.  I don't think any businessman should be forced to stay in
    business if his business isn't being supported.
    
    While I don't believe Candlestick Park is that bad, I think Lurie tried
    everything he could to convince San Francisco and vicinity that he
    needed some help in order to stay.  I believe the team has been losing
    money.  I believe the prospects for losses would be worse in the future
    with the inevitable cutbacks in TV money, without a corresponding boost
    in attendance.  Since the Stick is an important factor in attendance at
    Giants games, a new ballpark was probably necessary.
    
    The folks in the area didn't want to commit their resources to help. 
    The governments didn't show the vision to just do it and get it done
    like Baltimore did.  Lurie probably said to himself "Fine.  I tried
    everything I could.  I'm selling the team and you can take your
    chances."  He was up front about it along.  Local interests, according
    to what I read, rejected the idea of buying the team as well because
    they saw the same situation as he did.
    
    I don't want to get into a LDUC over what St Pete did or didn't do, but
    I certainly don't blame Lurie for wanting to sell the team.  I'm
    saddened to see the Giants leave San Francisco.  San Francisco was the
    first city I got interested in when I was a kid and I became a Giants
    fan once I discovered baseball.  I've become interested in the history
    of the franchise and said if I could travel back in time and see one
    torn-down ballpark, it would have been the Polo Grounds.  Some of this
    attraction will die for me since I have no interest in Tampa/St Pete. 
    I feel bad for the Giants fans who are losing their team but I'm not
    sad for the area as a whole - they made their choice.
    
    John
3.1233SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesThu Aug 13 1992 12:455
       So JD, what was Lurie supposed to do, take a financial bath? And it
    only makes sense that a city that was in contention for a franchise
    should try and get one that is for sale. Would it make more sense if he
    sold the team to somebody in Hartford? 
                                     Denny
3.1234By law, baseball does *not* operate as normal business!NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Aug 13 1992 13:1329
    
    For the record, as I said a while back, I don't blame Bob Lurie or the
    Bay Area for this situation.  I think both parties had their hands tied
    (don't forget, if it hadn't been for an act of God in the form of an
    untimely earthquake, a beautiful new ballpark would be going up in SF's 
    China Basin right now, and we wouldn't be talking about this).  I blame
    major-league baseball for a lack of vision.  No matter how many
    franchise moves take place, when the dust settles a number of years
    later you're not going to have any kind of an equitable economic
    climate between baseball's markets.
    
    Baseball has an antitrust exemption that prohibits *real* free-market
    competition by placing limits on expansion and prohibiting franchise
    moves into certain existing markets.  They claim that this exemption is
    necessary because sports are *not* like any other business and without
    it there could not be competition on the field.  But speaking out of 
    both sides of its mouth, baseball tells smaller markets that if they 
    can't compete, tough crap.  If you're not filling your share of the till 
    at this very moment no matter how far the odds are stacked against you, 
    to hell with the greater good of baseball and move it on out...  
    
    How come everyone was excoriating the Chicago Cubs a couple of weeks
    back for protecting their financial interests in a relatively minor 
    matter, but are now live-and-let-live laissez-fairests when baseball is
    allowing a proud franchise to pack up and move into yet another 
    ridiculous phony-dome for those same greasy greenbacks?
    
    glenn
       
3.1235CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Aug 13 1992 13:533
    Right on Glenn.    
    
    JD
3.1236There's a finite number of teamsSALES::THILLThu Aug 13 1992 13:5523
    re a few back
    Someone compared the Giants with Baltimore, and how the city built
    Camden Yards. OPCY cost a ton of money, well spent IMO, but still a
    lot. The SF area has a lot of other things, such as earthquake repairs,
    to spend money on. As much as I'd like to see the Giants stay in SF, I
    can't blame the city for saying that a new park is low on the priority
    list, much like when Oakland decided not to give Al Davis $100 million
    to move the Raiders back, when the schools had no money, etc.  
    
    The whole idea of franchises moving so more newer cities can feel good
    about themselves and be considered "big league" isn't going to end. It
    seemed like a good setup with 12 teams in each league, since the
    schedules worked out prety well and each team came to town enough...
    With 14 teams, scheduling is a mess. What's next? 16 teams per league
    so that these AAA cities can now be big league? Probably. There has to
    be a finite number of viable, first tier teams. Perhaps a setup where
    the bottom teams have somethig to lose by finishing last (and something
    to gain - keeping their major league status - by not) would be an
    answer. In 30 years will there be 50 "major league" teams? Play each
    other one series a year, home and away. Sorry, not everyone can be big 
    league....  
    
    Tom
3.1237PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 13 1992 15:235
    Easy, Glenn.  It doesn't appear that the Cubs will go broke if they
    move to the NL West.  Concessions were being made by other teams to
    accomodate the Cub's wishes to lessen the impact on their SuperStation. 
    By all reports, Lurie would go broke trying to keep the Giants in San
    Francisco.
3.1238LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelThu Aug 13 1992 15:2918
    
    Glenn,
    
    I'd have been surprised if the China Basin park would have passed, even
    if there had been no quake.  The people of the city had already voted
    down at least one other proposal, and this one seemed little better. 
    One of the problems in trying to get the park OK'd by the people of the
    City of SF itself, is that a small minority of the fans actually lived
    there.  That was why SJ was where everyone hoped it would pass.  By and
    large, the memories of the quake have faded, also.
    
    
    JD,
    
    I have no problem with methaphors, just the boring ones you've
    plagarized from T.  Make up something original.
    
    Brews
3.1239ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Aug 13 1992 15:448
    Brews,
    
    I though that in 1989 the polls showed that the stadium issue would
    pass. Especially with the A's-Giants WS that year. Then of course came
    the earthquake.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1240LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelThu Aug 13 1992 15:5010
    
    If I remember correctly, the Bay ARea wanted the stadium, not the
    people of SF.  The polls were of the entire area.  It's one of the
    problems they have there, as there is no central gov't for the entire
    area (SF is a city and county).  Those polls have also been very
    innaccurate.  I believe they get manipulated (or the people answering
    the polls don't vote) by the press (who want a stadium).  I thought the
    SJ was supposed to pass, and it really wasn't that close.
    
    Brews 
3.1241CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Aug 13 1992 16:4912
Brews -

It seems that other than Saw, no one has gotten what I was doing.  Pretty sad.

Any way, to those who keep calling it a business, and the lame comparisons
to DEC, remember Baseball has the good ol' anti-trust exemption.   DEC  can't
use proximity or loss of base if a Sun or Apple or whomever decides to invade
their territory.   Baseball can.  That's why even the subtle threat of repeal -
ala TOm Foley in Washington - quieted the jingoistic reaction to Nintendo's
bid on the Mariners.  

JD
3.1242PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Aug 13 1992 16:534
3.1243San Fran gets dumped on, but San Jose voters were most adamantNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Aug 13 1992 16:5811
    Polls aside, the vote on China Basin *was held* in the city of San
    Francisco, shortly after the earthquake, and it's my understanding that 
    the result was the closest of all four of the referendums.  The
    proposal was barely defeated by 51 to 49 percent or something like
    that, and the earthquake was cited as a primary cause.  By comparison,
    the most recent San Jose-only vote was a landslide against, 56 to 44 or
    close to that...
    
    glenn
    
3.1244CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Thu Aug 13 1992 16:595
HAHAHAHAHHAHA(TM)  Now, that's funny !

JD

(Re MAC)
3.1245CAMONE::WAYThere are monkey boys in the facilityThu Aug 13 1992 17:005
>    If noone but 'Saw understands/thinks like you, that's pretty sad for
>    you indeed.  ;^}


Hey, I resemble that remark!   8^)
3.1246And the San Jose stadium proposal was for $250M, taxpayer providedNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 14 1992 13:0719
                        
    > Easy, Glenn.  It doesn't appear that the Cubs will go broke if they
    > move to the NL West.  Concessions were being made by other teams to
    > accomodate the Cub's wishes to lessen the impact on their SuperStation. 
    > By all reports, Lurie would go broke trying to keep the Giants in San
    > Francisco.
    
    Those reports must have come the propaganda wing of the Lurie empire.
    Bob Lurie is not going broke any time soon.  He's worth $500 million,
    and is one of the few truly cash-rich, purely private, non-leveraged 
    owners in MLB.  I don't expect him to have to sustain continued losses 
    in baseball, but in spite of the negative publicity baseball has been 
    bery bery good to Bob Lurie.  Lurie bought the Giants in 1976 for a 
    mere $8 million, rode out the most prosperous era in its history, and
    just sold the club for $110 million in spite of the fact that he never 
    put much of his own money into it.  Not a bad return on investment, no?
    
    glenn
    
3.1247ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Mon Aug 17 1992 00:057
    It was a little cold, but not really too bad...
    
    Put a fork in the SF Giants.  They're gone.  No one cares if they go
    except a handful.  They tried a demonstration when I was there Monday
    night and they couldn't get people to do that.  Last minute efforts
    are only putting off the inevitable.
    
3.1248AL East race is overACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Aug 27 1992 16:405
    Mets traded David Cone to Toronot for Jeff Kent and one other
    player.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1249PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineThu Aug 27 1992 18:2012
    
    >>Mets traded David Cone to Toronot for Jeff Kent and one other
    >>player.
    
    TCM:
    
    Is this a sign that the Mucking Fets are giving up on THIS season???
    
    Trading a very good starter away before the race is over!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.1250CTHQ1::LEARYChainsaw: Possible ND convert?Thu Aug 27 1992 18:296
    Getting rid of high-priced players they couldn't re-sign for sum yung
    blood is ok, even tho Cone is good. Hopefully the floodgates
    pointing west will be soon opening on Yawkey Way. 
    
    MikeL
    
3.1251GOMETS::mccarthyMike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531Thu Aug 27 1992 18:3213
Jake,

Cone is free agent at the end of the year.  He wants a 5 year contract.
He might agree to a 4 year deal, but the Mets have been pretty adament
about not giving pitchers more than a 3 year deal.  The Mets must have
decided that they couldn't sign Cone, and at least got something for 
him.

Depending on the PTBNL, I think the Mets did the right thing.  They 
can use Kent at either 2nd or 3rd.  I'd put him at second and try to
hire Willie Randolph as a coach.

Mike
3.1252JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Aug 27 1992 18:364
    ESPN reported that the PTBNL will probably be OF Derek Bell.
    
    
    py
3.1253ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Aug 27 1992 19:326
    How many games back are the Mets now? Yeah they are giving up on the
    season, but the move was probably a good one. Let me sulk for the
    weekend, I'll let you know on Monday.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1254ROYALT::ASHEI shot da sheriff, didn't get da boycott...Thu Aug 27 1992 21:243
    Which means they can put Bell in CF, and move Hojo to 3rd?  Pecota
    at SS, Kent at 2b?  Pressure is on Toronto to sign him now...
    
3.1255ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Aug 27 1992 23:145
    Word on ESPN that the PTNBL will be some guy Thompson. nyone heard of
    him??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1256FDCV06::KINGFri Aug 28 1992 12:056
    Actually The Blow Jays will have COme only for the rest of the season.
    Cone had stated and re-stated that he wats to pitch in New York.
    The Mets then sign him as a free agent after the season. 
    Then they get Kent and PTBNL "free" from Toronto...
    
    REK
3.1257very plausibleCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeFri Aug 28 1992 12:368
    There's also a very strong possibility that "wants to play in NY"
    could be translated "Steinbrenner has a bigger money pot".
    
    Don't discount the possibilility of him donning pinstripes.
    
    hth,
    Kev
    
3.1258PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineFri Aug 28 1992 12:419
    
    >>Which means they can put Bell in CF, and move Hojo to 3rd?  Pecota
    >>at SS, Kent at 2b?  Pressure is on Toronto to sign him now...
    
    Speaking of HoJo, is it true the guys gone for the year due to surgery
    on both knees and a shoulder??????
    
    JaKe
    
3.1259NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Aug 28 1992 13:1010
    
    The Mets are in effect "renting" Cone out for the last month of the
    season, but they do have to weigh the players they're receiving 
    against the two first or one first/one second round draft picks
    (depending on the finish of the team that signs Cone) they would have
    gotten in next year's amateur draft.  That's not a tremendously big
    deal, but it is significant...
    
    glenn
    
3.1260Ryan ThompsonWMOIS::DUPREZ_RCompact Disc JockeySun Aug 30 1992 21:2517
    
    RE: .1255
    
    "Thompson" is Ryan Thompson, an OF at AAA Syracuse.  Saw him play
    a couple of weeks back - he hit two homers.  Good power, good speed.
    Looks like he has lots of talent but I don't remember his numbers
    as being all that spectacular.
    
    If I were a Met fan, I'd have no problem with the deal.  They
    weren't going to re-sign Cone, and they get a couple of good
    young ballplayers.  In Kent's case, they get someone to fill a
    spot.  And I believe Thompson is a CF - if he pans out they move
    HoJo back where he belongs.
    
    					Roland,
    					no longer a RON
    
3.1261PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineMon Aug 31 1992 11:428
    
    >>					Roland,
    >>					no longer a RON
    
    Welcome aboard, Roland, we need all the new blood we can get.
    
    JaKe
    
3.1262PFSVAX::JACOBBald Head=Solar Panel 4 a Sex MachineThu Sep 03 1992 00:0211
    Anybody see the film fo Vince "where's the brain" Coleman lasted night
    arguing with the Mucking Fets' manager after the manager(cain't
    remember his name)came out to seperate Coleman from the umpire???
    
    Coleman is getting big bucks to act like the south facing end of a
    northbound mule, ain't he?????
    
    THe Mucking Fets then suspended Coleman for 2 games without pay.
    
    JaKe
    
3.1263ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Thu Sep 03 1992 02:237
    It gets better with Coleman. WFAN was reporting that like most managers
    Torborg does not want his players playing golf on game days. Rumor has
    it that Coleman played a round of golf yesterday morning and there was
    tension between them even before the incident during the game.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1264JARETH::YANKOWSKASPaul YankowskasThu Sep 03 1992 12:428
    There was another good "where's the brainer" in an Astros game earlier
    this week.  'Stros pitcher Darryl Kile went to cover first on a right
    side grounder, but didn't get there in time and the runner was called
    safe.  As Kile argued the call *while still holding the ball*, the
    runner on second came in to score!
    
    
    py
3.1265GOMETS::mccarthyMike McCarthy MRO4-3/C19 297-4531Thu Sep 03 1992 16:293
Sounds like David Cone a few seasons back.  He let two runners score.

Mike
3.1266Faye voted out! Hot flashCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeFri Sep 04 1992 01:5313
    
    
    HOT NEWS FLASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    
    By a 18-9 vote the MLB owners voted to ouste Commissioner Faye Vincent!
    (B'Sox voted him to stay)
    
    Action moves from the Field to the courthouse!
    
    I remain,
    yer radio reporter!
    Kev
    
3.1267Naturally they want him to resignCSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeFri Sep 04 1992 02:061
    
3.1268Kev,Interesting choice of words for .1266 title :-)ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Fri Sep 04 1992 06:3218
    Vote was to ask him to resign. Peter Gammons on ESPN speculated that
    Vincent's supporters will ask him to leave since it is clear he won't
    be able to do anything for the rest of his term. Also, that in next
    weeks meeting in St. Louis the vote to fire him could be 22-6 or even
    23-5. Vincent would have 2 days to get an injunction and that might not
    happen, so he would be gone. 
    
    There is something to be said for principle (can't believe I said that
    in this notesfile :-), but it sounds like Vincent would be beter off
    cutting his losses at this point. He was hired by the owners and much
    as he might like to think of his office as serving the fans, players
    and owners he really serves the owners. One of the things I agreed with
    in Marvin Miller's book - which was quite self serving in lots of ways
    - was that the commissioner as a representative of all of baseball is a
    myth.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1269SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Sep 04 1992 11:533
       As usual, the owners put the blame for their own incompetance on
    somebody else.
                                  Denny
3.1270Lockout in March!AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Sep 04 1992 12:131
    
3.1271The job is a no-win situationSALES::THILLFri Sep 04 1992 14:3527
    So if they fired him, that means he can collect unemployment, but if
    they "ask him to resign" that means he cain't, right? :-)
    
    The whole problem with the office the way that it is set up is that
    there is no way it can be anything BUT a lackie yes-man job, only there
    to serve the 28 owners. It always has been, going back to Kennisaw
    Mountain Landis (I wonder if his nickname was 'Saw?), who was appointed
    to restore the PR image of baseball after the Black Sox scandal. 
    
    Bowie Kuhn, who wore several pairs of long johns under his suit so he 
    could pretend that it wasn't cold enough for a coat at the first World
    Series night games inteh early '70s, was no different.
    
    The owners liked Uberoth at first 'cause he made them rich(er) but felt
    betrayed when the collusion scam was uncovered. Gaimanti was
    romanticised as a_intellectual/fan, and was potentially the best
    commish there was, cause he was actually a FAN of the game, and he even
    suggested a hold on ticket price increases. He wasnt around long enough
    :-( Fay bungled a few things, but in fairness to him, never really had a 
    chance
    
    Having the owners in charge of the commish is like parents having the
    kids make all the household rules: "I don't have to do ANY homework or go 
    to school, my allowance is a million dollars a week and for dinner we'll 
    have a can of chocolate frosting..." 
    
    Tom
3.1272AXIS::ROBICHAUDNatteringNabobsOfNegativismFri Sep 04 1992 14:464
    	Within 10 years every major baseball decision will be made by
    a federal judge and then appealed to the Supreme Court.
    
    				/Don
3.1273Vincent resignsACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '92Mon Sep 07 1992 23:393
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1274Faye It Ain't So...AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo,That'sAllYaGottaKnowTue Sep 08 1992 16:261
    
3.1275Guess he'll just Fay'd away after all!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesTue Sep 08 1992 16:492
    
    
3.1276PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemMon Sep 14 1992 13:318
    Aneebuddy know what the Expos(ed) did lasted night???
    
    They was losing 5-4 but I didn't hear the final score.
    
    Thanks in advance
    
    JaKe
    
3.1277Maybe only real pennant race left...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Sep 14 1992 13:359
    
    > Aneebuddy know what the Expos(ed) did lasted night???
    >
    > They was losing 5-4 but I didn't hear the final score.
    
    Pulled it out, 7-5 to move within three games, sorry to say...
    
    glenn
    
3.1278PFSVAX::JACOBCarp Per DiemMon Sep 14 1992 14:424
    Damn those Mucking Fets cain't do anything right, cain they??
    
    JaKe
    
3.1279GENRAL::WADEWisdom Toofless!Mon Sep 14 1992 15:477
    
    Jake,
    
    	I'm pretty sure Larry Walker cranked a 3 run dinger to win
    	it for the Expos.......
    
    Claybone
3.1280Wouldn't that be just a shame? ;-)NAC::G_WAUGAMANTue Sep 15 1992 20:5015
       
    A vote to protect the prospective local buyers of the San Francisco
    Giants against the cost of lawsuits was unanimously passed by the 
    SF city council yesterday.  The National League had previously pledged 
    its support to local buyers in their bid to keep the Giants in San
    Francisco, and Bob Lurie has acquiesced to the league's wishes.
    
    It very much looks like it's all over but the crying once again for
    Tampa/St Pete.  They prepared for a lawsuit in advance this time, but 
    no amount of legal tantrum-throwing is going to allow them to sue the 
    Giants out of another state.  The Tilt-a-Dome still looms as a massive
    albatross around the neck of the community...
    
    glenn
    
3.1281CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Wed Sep 16 1992 12:324
It would make my year if Tampa/St. Bleat ends up with nothing.  Haha.  Maybe
they should try for a Japanese team....

JD
3.1282CTHQ::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadWed Sep 16 1992 13:086
3.1283PFSVAX::JACOBIntro to Employee Interest Noting 101Fri Sep 18 1992 12:1711
    PINELLA(sp?) AND DIBBLE QUIBBLE!!!
    
    Is Dibble headed for another suspension????
    
    Is Pinella(sp?) headed for the WWF???
    
    Does anybody Care?????
    
    
    JaKe
    
3.1284NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 18 1992 13:145
    
    Is Rob Dibble the ultimate primordial wet lump of clay?
    
    glenn
    
3.1285PFSVAX::JACOBCompletely MindlessFri Sep 18 1992 13:4312
    
    >>Is Rob Dibble the ultimate primordial wet lump of clay?
    
    >>glenn
    
    glenn,
    
    I think he's a wet lump, but more of a wet lump of what a bull leaves
    steaming in the field than clay.
    
    JaKe
    
3.1286CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Sep 18 1992 14:104
So then, using Jake's Guide to Fe-males, Rob Dibble is the absolute PERFECT
catch...;-)

JD
3.1287Great with kids, too...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Sep 18 1992 14:5212
    
> So then, using Jake's Guide to Fe-males, Rob Dibble is the absolute PERFECT
> catch...;-)
    
    I seen his wife in SI, and she's smashing.  It was one of those puff
    pieces where they claim that Dibble is a big puppy-dog type, who has 
    been "misinterpreted" his whole life, has never thrown at anyone, 
    never intentionally tried to hurt any living thing, and just wants to
    be treated like a main...
    
    glenn
    
3.1288A real main's main!AXIS::ROBICHAUDAlanAlda,PauleyShore,RobDibbleFri Sep 18 1992 15:111
    
3.1289ALT/PITT SCORE?WILBRY::MCDONALDMon Oct 12 1992 15:317
    Score from last nites game??
    
    ( I looked for a topic for the NLCS but didn't find one )
    
    Thanks
    Shawn
    
3.1290FSBIC::JHENDRYJohn Hendry, DTN 297-2623Mon Oct 12 1992 16:014
    Pittsburgh 7, Atlanta 1.  Pittsburgh knocked Atlanta starting pitcher
    Steve Avery out in the firsted innning by scoring 4 runs.
    
    John
3.1291This OCT. is costing Bonds $$$$WILBRY::MCDONALDMon Oct 12 1992 17:065
    Great, at least it's a series now.
    
    Any chance Bonds showed up for the game??
    
    s-
3.1292PFSVAX::JACOBAnd I fall down 3 times a dayMon Oct 12 1992 18:5311
    there's a write up of sorts in 92.sumthinorother, that I put in early
    this AM when the game finished.
    
    Bonds went 2-5, with one RBI, two runs scored, one stolen base, and a
    beaut of a catch, on the run, in left center field to rob Ron Gant of a
    run producing extra base hit, and possibly rally catalyst.
    
    Bonds played like he did in Sept. lasted night.
    
    JaKe
    
3.1293MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Oct 16 1992 11:5114
    
     So, did anyone catch the post-game feud between the Neon Peon
    and Tim McCarver. In the Braves locker room after the 7th game, 
    Ole Slime Time sought Tim McCarver out and dumped a large bucket 
    of water on him while McCarver was conducting interviews. Peon did 
    this not once but FOUR times. McCarver was understandably upset.
    It seems Peon did it in retaliation for McCarver's criticism of 
    Peon's jetting from the Falcon's game to the Braves' game on 
    Sunday. Pretty mature response. I'm not Tim McCarver's biggest
    fan (Annie Wilkes is) but it's his job to offer his opinion on
    anything pertaining to baseball. FWIW, I also felt that whole 
    scenario Sunday was nothing but a publicity stunt.
    
    
3.1294CNTROL::CHILDSMillen the best bargin in the NFLFri Oct 16 1992 11:565
Tommy tm that ole Slime Time, it's a beauty....At this point one has to wonder
who has the bigger ego Slime Time or Ross Perot?

mike
3.1295CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicFri Oct 16 1992 12:1519
>Tommy tm that ole Slime Time, it's a beauty....At this point one has to wonder
>who has the bigger ego Slime Time or Ross Perot?


Neon does.  8^)


Seriously, I like Tim McCarver.  He's done really well for an ex-player,
compared to some other ex-players I've seen.

As to Deion dumping a bucket of water.  Well, once is okay.  But four
times is really pushing it.

I personally would've busted Deion up a bit.  I'm not a really patient
guy, and okay, once is funny, twice is cute, but after that, hey,
let's act like adults.....


'Saw
3.1296LJOHUB::CRITZFri Oct 16 1992 12:3220
    	RE: McCarver and Neon
    
    	Lasted (tm) night on TNT, after the Vikings' game, one
    	of the commentators said the Snake had an idea. Why not
    	contact Bob Arum or Don King and have a boxing match
    	between McCarver and Neon.
    
    	I thought it was pretty funny.
    
    	My cut at this Neon thing is simple -
    
    	He's no Bo Jackson.
    
    	He needs to decide which sport he wants to play and play it.
    
    	Someone on TV last night said that the Braves may replace Neon
    	on the roster with someone else. Neon said he wouldn't be home
    	crying about it. He'd go play football with the Falcons.
    
    	Scott
3.1297MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Oct 16 1992 12:5110
    
       Given their respective ages and the state of their physical
      conditions, a Peon vs. McCarver bout would, at least on paper,
      be a gross mismatch. If McCarver really wants to get back at
      the Peon he should take a cue from Robert Townsend's "Hollywood
      Shuffle" and steal the Peon's curl activator. I would have liked
      to have seen Peon try that stunt on Dan Deirdorf or OJ Simpson.
    
      BTW - word in today's Globule is that the Braves have included
      Slime Time on their world series roster.
3.1298SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Oct 16 1992 13:044
       McCarver was yelling. "You're a real man Deion" at him as he
    slithered away. Hopefully the Braves will keep him off the WS roster
    and we won't have to look at him nexted week.
                                 Dneny
3.1299ACESMK::FRANCUSFrancisco Cabrera, my heroFri Oct 16 1992 13:067
    Neon_sign(tm) is living up to his nickname. Think about it, neon signs
    are generally associated with Gawdy, vulgar things (Las Vegas, sleazy
    nightclubs, Times Square, etc.) They are never associated with CLASS,
    and Neon_sign has zero class.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1300Yup, saw it...^^^^XCALBR::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Fri Oct 16 1992 13:103
    Except, I didn't see it the first time because at least Ch. 7 didn't
    show McCarver talking to any of the players before they left the air...
    
3.1301PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 16 1992 13:178
    What did McCarver say to get Neon so steamed?
    
    McCarver is asking the NL for a formal apology.
    
    At least we're seeing creative reporter mugging this season.  First
    there was Roger and the hamburger buns, now Deion and the ice bucket. 
    Definitely more interesting than the "athlete slugs reporter" routine
    that is typically seen.
3.1302XCALBR::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Fri Oct 16 1992 13:241
    That he was selfish for trying to play 2 sports in 1 day...
3.1303Ugh...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 16 1992 13:2522
         
    It's pretty obvious that Deion doesn't care too much for his team in
    being pre-occupied with his endorsement possibilities during the NLCS 
    and by pulling stunts like that after his team just pulled off one of 
    the greatest wins in MLB history, but that doesn't mean we can't put 
    this in terms that even Deion himself can understand: bad, *bad* PR 
    move, Deion.  Nike...no...like...
    
    That's a hell of a way to pay CBS back for all they did in shamelessly 
    pandering to Deion by covering his cross-country trip, even sending a 
    personal lackey along in the person of MrT's favoritest broadcasting 
    celebrity, Pat O'Brien.  This is my main objection with CBS ever since 
    they paid that outrageous amount for the baseball contract.  They're 
    doing their damndest to turn MLB into a celebrity circus, a la the NBA.
    Baseball don't need help from the likes of a bit player like Deion.
    Play the game, respect the game, and you earn respect.
    
    Here's hoping that the Braves reconsider their decision on the roster
    spot so that I can stomach rooting for the Braves in the Series.
    
    glenn
    
3.1304MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Oct 16 1992 13:479
    
     Your first paragraph pretty much sums up the way I felt about 
    it, Glen. How he could even think of himself at a time like that
    just boggles the mind. As far as paying CBS back goes though, they
    deserved to slapped up side the head for wasting air time on the
    whole travelin' Peon debacle. 
    
    BTW - according to this morning's Globe the ratings numbers for
    both LCS' were down significantly from last year.
3.1305WWF/MLBAXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowFri Oct 16 1992 16:065
    	This whole Neion/McCarver thing reminds me of when Papa Shango
    put a curse on Mean Gene Okerlund.  I'll tell ya, major league baseball
    is learning...
    
    				/Don
3.1306SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesFri Oct 16 1992 16:162
       Unbelievable Gorilla!!
                                            Denny
3.1307Maybe Ill change to M_Primetime_BRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Oct 16 1992 16:3610
    I think we have the Air Jordan of Baseball/Football.  Some people
    just Gotta hate him, therefore I gotta Like em :-)
    
    The only thing I have to say is if he broke any written
    terms/agreements with either the falcons or Braves thats
    one thing, but if not let em play.  I dont watch much baseball
    but in football it just seems like he makes good things happen
    every time he touches the ball....
    
    					M_Air_B
3.1308MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Oct 16 1992 16:468
  >> I think we have the Air Jordan of Baseball/Football.  Some people
  >> just Gotta hate him, therefore I gotta Like em :-)
    
     I don't remember anyone saying they didn't like the Neon Peon
     until this despicable incident. He made his bed and now he's 
     going to have to pay the piper. [how's that for mixed metaphors?]
    
    
3.1309LJOHUB::CRITZFri Oct 16 1992 17:1110
    	RE: 3.1307
    
    	I believe McCarver did say that Neon did have a contract
    	that stipulated that he (Neon) could not play football if
    	Atlanta was in the pennant race (and World Series).
    
    	So, if that's the troof (tm), then Neon broke his contract
    	(which, of course, is nothing new in pro sports).
    
    	Scott
3.1310ACESMK::FRANCUSFrancisco Cabrera, my heroFri Oct 16 1992 17:148
    I'm pretty sure the contract was that Neon_sign(tm) would not miss any
    baseball games during the playoffs. Of course everyones logical
    assumption was that meant no football. So Neon_sign may have broken an
    implicit contract - which can carry some weight - but not a written
    contract.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1311Glitter Boy needs to grow upMATE::MMARLANDFri Oct 16 1992 17:4112
    Bottom line , what goes around comes around, let's look at his stat's
    Falcons are once again in the cellar. Some big impact player here. For
    the Braves, I think he's had a few AB's the one I saw he wiffed big time as
    a pinch hitter. I'd like see him try to make it a both, but I think
    circumstances catch up real quick. Great PR for Deion, little results
    for the men who sign his check...
    
    Time for this glitter boy to grow up a bit. After all, most players are
    looked upon for their accomplishments on the field, not off.
    
    Mike
       
3.1312NO TO BLAM!CUPMK::DEVLINJe voudrais boire quelque chose.Fri Oct 16 1992 18:0212
    KNNEEON IS NO TWO BLAM!   LITE ME UP FOLLOWS MCNOVER A TOOO BITE
    KORCHER THAT IS JELLYUS OF DEDON11!!!!   HE MAKE MILLIYON PAYEING BOAT
    FUTBUL AND BAZEBULL AND YUR JEST JELOUS!!!    HE ES NO TOO BLAM!  ALL
    SLANDER DOD WUZ THRO WADER ON MACARVVER AND GET HIM WET - ALL IN PHONE!
    TIME MCCOGLE KENT TAKE A JOCK!    NOXON DEADON IS TWUE TALLANT - HE
    BEGGOR THAN TONI EASION AND CHANISLAW NOS IT!    LEAF HIM ALOAN -
    STANDERS LED BLAVES TOO PENANCE AND FULCRUMS TO PLAYOAFS!
    
    
    GOAT DEION!
    
    CR
3.1313RCASO alertACESMK::FRANCUSFrancisco Cabrera, my heroFri Oct 16 1992 18:203
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1315PFSVAX::JACOBAlmost, Damnit, only 'Almost'Fri Oct 16 1992 18:4613
    Question, now I know the answer for this question when it comes to
    football, it's because he wears a helmet and that makes the ole head
    slightly aerodynamic, but
    
    How doe Deon Sanders run so fast when playing baseball with ears
    sticking out like tail flaps on a 747????  Does he pin them back to
    help on the aerodynamics?????  Shouldn't those ears limit him to the
    speed of, say, Mike Lavalliere????
    
    Inquiring minds and all that
    
    JaKe
    
3.1316CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicFri Oct 16 1992 18:4811
>    How doe Deon Sanders run so fast when playing baseball with ears
>    sticking out like tail flaps on a 747????  Does he pin them back to
>    help on the aerodynamics?????  Shouldn't those ears limit him to the
>    speed of, say, Mike Lavalliere????
    

Park Effects.


'Saw for Dan    

3.1318ACESMK::FRANCUSFrancisco Cabrera, my heroFri Oct 16 1992 18:516
    re: .1317
    
    Because he wanted you to ask?? :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1319ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Fri Oct 16 1992 18:592
    I wondered to but didn't want to start a political or pc type
    discussion...
3.1320NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 16 1992 19:025
    
    "Poisenal"?  That sounds Brooklynese...
    
    glenn
    
3.1321CELTIK::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!!Fri Oct 16 1992 19:228
    Bacause that's how it sounded.  Let's face it, Sanders is no Orson
    Wells when it somes to diction, but more like Orson Donshultewski, the
    mill hunky.
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.1322ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Fri Oct 16 1992 19:281
    Ok, never mind....
3.1323PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Fri Oct 16 1992 19:3110
    
    >>I wondered to but didn't want to start a political or pc type
    >>discussion...
    
    Hey, we don't talk about Personal Computing in here!!!!
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.1324What does C> mean?ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Fri Oct 16 1992 19:461
    Tell that to the technodweebs....
3.1325SOLANA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownFri Oct 16 1992 19:496
    
    Hey Walt, that's my line!!  Careful or I'll banish you from the
    sports.oldiesbutgoodies.note.  I gots mod privs you know, and I ain't
    afraid to use them  (ask Farley).
    
    BtFM
3.1326Brews sez "What does C> mean?"ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Fri Oct 16 1992 20:103
    Sorry
    Brews sez "Tell that to the technodweebs.... "
    
3.1327SOLANA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownFri Oct 16 1992 20:352
    huh?  wassamatta?  Dinz got your keyboard?
    
3.1328AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowFri Oct 16 1992 21:444
    	I see where McSherry is making a miracle HulkHogan recovery.
    Glad to hear it.
    
    				/Don
3.1329PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Mon Oct 19 1992 12:1211
    No World Series note, so I enter this here.
    
    Series tied at 1 each, headed for Canadia.
    
    Braves(should be the Bucs, dammit) win game 1 on ??Berryhill's??(I
    think) 3 run HR, final 3-1.
    
    Game lasted night see-sawed and the Blue Jays(GO TORONTO!!) won, 5-4.
    
    JaKe
    
3.1330CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Mon Oct 19 1992 12:175
    Well at least Reardon won't get a stiff neck from last night.
    Those muscles oughta be well toned by now.
    
    MikeL
    
3.1331CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 12:211
Jeff Rearend blows another one 8^(
3.1332MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedMon Oct 19 1992 12:3310
    
    >Jeff Rearend blows another one 8^(
    
    Was anyone surprised when he was brought in and admirably demonstrated
    his forte?
    
    I thought not.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.1333PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 19 1992 13:003
    After ticking off the Native Americans in last year's World Series, now
    Atlanta has angered the Canadians.  It seems the Canadian Flag was hung
    upside down during the opening ceremonies.
3.1334MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrMon Oct 19 1992 13:1716
    
     re .1333
    
     Didn't one of the announcers last night make mention of how the 
    Atlanta area papers were playing up the Canada vs. US angle ?
    
     I said it somewhere in note 92 in response to another noter's 
    "keep it in the US" statement. I don't understand that kind of
    thinking at all. The Blue Jays and the Braves aren't the national 
    teams of Canada and the US. They're two major league baseball
    teams. Period. What are we going to do should the Jays win it ?
    Form another Dream Team so we can restore national pride ?
    
     BTW - Am I the only one who got queasy when he saw Jane's phonier 
           than a five dollar Rolex prayer act ?
    
3.1335CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 13:1812
>     BTW - Am I the only one who got queasy when he saw Jane's phonier 
>           than a five dollar Rolex prayer act ?


Was that after RearEnd served up a nice Mama Leone meatball?

If so, I zapped out after the meatball landed in the sauce behind the
fence.....


'Saw    

3.1336CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadMon Oct 19 1992 13:2910
>     BTW - Am I the only one who got queasy when he saw Jane's phonier 
>           than a five dollar Rolex prayer act ?


I felt more like hurling when they showed the instant replay of Jane singing 
"Take me out to the Ballgame" with the crowd, and then smooching with Ted more
blatently than Dickstah and Casey.  You could even hear in McDonough's voice
that he thought it was stoopid.

=Bob=
3.1337NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Oct 19 1992 13:4319
    
    How come Sean McDonough didn't yell "I don't believe what I just saw!"
    when Sprague hit that home run?  Oh yeah, never mind...
    
    I'm not buying into the Ugly Americanism thing this time.  Winning 
    this World Series means much, much more to Canada than losing it does 
    to Americans, believe me.  Show of hands: how many Canadians are 
    rooting for the Jays?  How many Americans are rooting for the Braves?
    Hell, there were reportedly a number of Jays' fans who sincerely
    believed that there was an American conspiracy to keep Toronto out of
    the World Series in previous years, because of the TV ratings and such.  
    Only Canada and /Don could believe something like that... ;-)
    
    C'mon, any rivalry here is good-natured.  We should respect whatever
    these foreign countries want to make of it.  It's Canada versus the
    Confederacy with the rest of us in the middle choosing sides... ;-)
    
    glenn
                                                                       
3.1338MCIS2::DHAMELFlower child gone to seedMon Oct 19 1992 13:5710
    
    Hey Bob,
    
    Suck my face.
    
    
    8^)
    
    Dickstah
    
3.1339CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadMon Oct 19 1992 14:048
Dickstah

Not if dan'l gets there first...


8^)

=Bob=
3.1340SOLANA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownMon Oct 19 1992 14:314
    
    I was rooting for the Braves until I saw JAne's prayer act.
    
    Brews
3.1341CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 14:347
>    I was rooting for the Braves until I saw JAne's prayer act.
    
I am rooting for Atlanta, but if they keep putting Jeff RearEnd in the
game, they'll be gone in 5......


'Saw
3.1342BSS::JCOTANCHMon Oct 19 1992 14:419
>    Hell, there were reportedly a number of Jays' fans who sincerely
>    believed that there was an American conspiracy to keep Toronto out of
>    the World Series in previous years, because of the TV ratings and such.  
>    Only Canada and /Don could believe something like that... ;-)
    
I'm sure JD could believe it too!  :^)


Joe
3.1343ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Mon Oct 19 1992 14:522
    Did they really have the Canadian flag upside down?
    
3.1344PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Oct 19 1992 14:561
    They sure did, Walt.  I saw it myself on the morning news.
3.1345CNTROL::CHILDSMake the smart choice, Andre MarrouMon Oct 19 1992 15:049
>>    They sure did, Walt.  I saw it myself on the morning news.


 and you call yourself a baseball fan? shame on you......

 many -> ;^)

 must have been a rugby game on another channel...
3.1346MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrMon Oct 19 1992 15:0812
    
     Personally, I don't like easy labels like "Politically Correct" or "Ugly 
    Americanism". Labels specifically designed to draw a specific reaction.
    I don't think this is about "Ugly Americanism". The number of people who 
    want the Braves to keep it in America is miniscule compared to the number 
    of folks who just want to see good baseball but the sentiment has been
    voiced more than once. And it's no big news flash that percentage of Can-
    adians behind the Jays is greater than the percentage of Americans behind 
    the Braves. Not only do we have longer standing stronger team loyalties
    but this is virgin territory for them. Let's just hope that the level
    of baseball stays at what it has been so far and let the chips fall where
    they may.
3.1347SOLANA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownMon Oct 19 1992 15:125
    
    It seems that the papers are playing up this USA vs. Canada thing, not
    hte people.  I mean, how many players are Canadian on either team?
    
    Brews 
3.1348AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowMon Oct 19 1992 15:159
	You also gotta love old Hanoi Jane belting out the national anthemn 
with such fervor.  Course I guess in retrospect America has been very very 
good to her.  I mean she's living the "American Dream" what with being an 
aerobicized accessory for Ted Turner's forearm.  Also other than the first 
Canadien who sang his anthem the first night, the anthems have been a "who 
can sing slower and/or add that genius creative flair to the song" contest. 
UGH!

				/Don
3.1349CNTROL::CHILDSMake the smart choice, Andre MarrouMon Oct 19 1992 15:234
 ah you're all a bunch of Morten Downeys picking on poor ole Jane....

 ;^)
3.1350ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Mon Oct 19 1992 15:262
    The same people are saying "Let's do it for USA" are the same ones who
    haven't given Francisco Cabrera a green card yet, right?
3.1351QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 15:283
    I wonder...  Was it done on purpose ???   ~/~
    
    Bg
3.1352AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowMon Oct 19 1992 15:353
    	Walt, maybe Ted&Jane can lend Francisco their Gold Card.
    
    				/Don
3.1353CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 15:497
A guy I play rugby with got his green card in the recent lottery.

Did you know that the card is NOT green?


hth,
'Sa
3.1354QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 16:003
    Never has been...
    
    
3.1355JARETH::YANKOWSKASand the home of the BravesMon Oct 19 1992 16:158
    > It seems that the papers are playing up this USA vs. Canada thing, not
    > hte people.  I mean, how many players are Canadian on either team?
    
    You beat me to it Brews.  For that matter, there are several players on
    each team who are neither Canadian nor American.
    
    
    py
3.1356MoroonsSCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 19 1992 17:116
    ...and the stadium message board was displaying messages in French,
    supposedly for the benefit of the Toronto fans. Well, guess what
    Atlanta...
       The official language of Ontario is ENGLISH!! Toronto is not in
    Quebec!
                                       Denny
3.1357Go Jays, eh?SALES::THILLMon Oct 19 1992 17:3023
    I didn't catch the French part. In fact, you might wonder if'n that was
    done specifically to piss off the Toronto fans. They have been known to
    boo their own national anthem if it is the version where the first part
    is sung in French...Take a look at the Canada conference if you want to
    see how sensitive the whole country is about this.
    
    Since the Expos have been around longer, they were the original
    "Canada's National Team," but in the last several years, people in the
    predominantly Engish-speaking areas have gravitated more toward the
    Jays. A large part of it has to do with on-field success, but some of
    it is political. When the Jays play in Detroit or Seattle, there's 
    usually a large contingent of Canadians in the stands. Even at Fenway, 
    where it isn't always easy to get tickets, I've seen a lot of Blue Jays 
    fans. I don't think the Expos get many away fans (or even at home), but
    the nearest NL city is New York.
    
    The Jays have had Canadian players, but they all were traded/relaesed.
    The most notable, ironically, is Denis Boucher, who's from the Montreal
    area. I read somewhere that the Jays are 19 Americans, 5 Dominicans, 2 
    Puerto Ricans (who are US Citizens) and a Jamaican. Hey mon, who's dat
    guy wid de dreadlocks 'angin oot of 'is cap?
       
    Tom
3.1358CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 17:4020
>
>    I didn't catch the French part. In fact, you might wonder if'n that was
>    done specifically to piss off the Toronto fans. They have been known to
>    boo their own national anthem if it is the version where the first part
>    is sung in French...Take a look at the Canada conference if you want to
>    see how sensitive the whole country is about this.


This is a very sensitive issue.

On A&E (I believe) John Byner has a comedy special that travels from
city to city.  The night they did it from Toronto (or someplace near
there) there were a lot of Canadian comics.

They did the standard jokes about how Canadians don't say "oot" and
stuff like that, but by far the most popular jokes, and the most
numerous were those that bashed the French speaking peoples of Canada.


'Saw    
3.1359Expos a victim of Quebec politicsSALES::THILLMon Oct 19 1992 18:0118
    Yeah, it's kinda too bad about how things in Can-e-dah have degenerated
    in the last 15 or so years. You can blame a lot of it on guys like Rene
    Levesque who were pushing a sepratist agenda in the 70s. Didja know
    that they passed a law that ripped up every "STOP" sign in the province
    and replaced it with one that says "ARRET"? Even in Paris vendors sell
    "le hot dog" but in Montreal, they sell "chiens-chauds." In Montreal's 
    Chinatown, Chinese signs are illegal (cause then English signs would be
    OK too) and French is the only official language. Because of this, many
    English speakers have left Montreal, further limiting it's diversity.
    
    The Expos have paid the price, since even though there are French fans, 
    baseball was more a sport that appeals to the English speakers. In 68
    when they first granted the franchise, Montreal was about 30-35%
    English, but now it's between 15-20%. You still need to be bilinguial
    if you have any sort of job that deals with the public.
    
    Tom 
    
3.1360CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 18:089
And from what I understand, the situation is complicated by the fact that
there are more (several, one?) province(s) EAST of Quebec that are English
speaking.

From what I've heard, if it weren't for that, the English speaking folks
in the gov't would have said "Hey, take off, eh, separate, eh, get oot".


'Saw
3.1361No offense eh!SCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 19 1992 18:1914
       All this Canada talk forces me to put this joke in here:
    All of you hosers know how Canada got it's name right? There were these
    guys sittin' around the fire drinkin' Moosehaid one wintery night. One
    of them says "Ain't it about time we named this here country eh?
    So they took a box and put all the letters a the alphabet in it. 
    First guy pulls out a letter...
    "C eh"
    Next guy pulls one out...
    "N eh"
    And one more...
    "D eh"
       And There you have it...C A N A D A!
                                        Sorry,
                                          Denny
3.1362PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Mon Oct 19 1992 18:3213
    RE Jane
    
    Made me sick seeing her doing the false prayer act, and the scene
    during the 7th inning stretch.
    
    As far as her being one of TedT's accessories, you cain put her as an
    accessory at the end of my...er...ARM, yeah that't the ticket, ARM,
    ANYTIME!!!!
    
    She do look good fer an old broad!!    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
3.1363Flame Off !!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 18:3412
     Denny,  You DOG !!!!   Thats one of my all time favorite
    jokes...   I was about to put it in but you beat me to it.  
    
     You know what pisses me off,  is that we have cities like Atlanta
    representing this country abroad.  We should respect others flags
    and diversity... that iswhat makes this country great and we should
    encourge it in others not prove to the world how backwards we are
    by pulling stunts like the flag and the language thing, either on
    purpose or by accident...  
    
    BG
     
3.1364CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicMon Oct 19 1992 18:4113
Hotlanta is gettin' ready for the 'lympics!

They wuz jes' practiciin'.


I'm surprised you didn't see that Stimpy on Drugs thang, or that
Blue Condom with eyes thang (same thang, different interpetation).....


yeeeeeee-ha!


'Saw
3.1365Hotlants OlympicsSCHOOL::RIEURead his lips...Know new taxesMon Oct 19 1992 19:143
       "Rings go better with Coke". (I stole it from Bill Conlon a the
    Sports Reporters.)
                                    Denny
3.1366Don't matter if it's Atlanta, Hoboken or Colo. Spgs it's stupidQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesMon Oct 19 1992 19:225
    Well,  it's just too bad that people a stupid enough to pull that kinda
    crap... it's really bad PR for the god ole` US of A and we don't need
    any more of that than we already got!  no what I mean vern ??
    
    BG
3.1367Cultural imperialism = NFL>CFLSALES::THILLMon Oct 19 1992 20:1834
>And from what I understand, the situation is complicated by the fact that
>there are more (several, one?) province(s) EAST of Quebec that are English
>speaking.



>'Saw
    
    The Maritimes are east of Quebec. New/Nouveau Brunswick is the only
    truly bilingual province, with about equal numbers of each group. Nova
    Scotia, Prince Edward Island, NewFOUNDland and Labrador are English
    speaking. Most of the people there are decendents of Scots and Irish,
    and have a speech pattern more like their kinfolk than the "typical"
    Canajin accent, eh? There are even signs in a gaelic-type language, and
    some older folks still speak it. The Newfies aren't considered Canajin, 
    by a lot of people's standards, (didn't join Canada til the '50s) and 
    they are the butt of a lot of effnik jokes.
    
    
>From what I've heard, if it weren't for that, the English speaking folks
>in the gov't would have said "Hey, take off, eh, separate, eh, get oot".
    
    Maybe so, but a little too complicated to get into here. The thing to
    remember is that a lot of Canadians are more than a little worried
    about "Cultural Imperialism" from the US engulfing it. You can see it
    with the low gates in the CFL (a better game IMO) partly due to the NFL
    available on cable TV. Some Americans think of Canada as another state,
    cause you can drive to it, but that's probably the quickest way to
    infuriate an otherwise mild-mannered Canadian! If Quebec left, its
    living standard would go down. Some suggest that if it were to happen, 
    the next step would be for the Maratimes to join the USA? Hey, we already 
    got ONE West Virginia!
    
    Tom  
3.1368RUGBY1::wayWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 20 1992 11:4218
I like Canadians, eh?  They are some fine folk, even if they do
talk about oh-fense, instead of aw-fense, and call these things
on the computer pr-oh-cesses, instead of pr-ah-cesses.  8^)

Seriously, I know things are very complex up there.  A while ago,
when they had some big major vote (and forgive me, with my failing
memory these days I cannot remember WHAT it was for) they covered
the parliment stuff on C-SPAN.  It was very interesting, but the
complexity of the issues was overwhelming.

"Newfie" jokes in Canada used to be on the same level as Polish jokes
were here, until we started cleaning up our act.....


Some beautiful country up dere in Canada, eh?


'Saw
3.1369all in fun...don't nuke us ;-)FSCORE::PAVEZKADrink Canada Dry....I'm tryingTue Oct 20 1992 11:516
    Heard on the news last night...
    
    Stores in Toronto have reported a brisk business in the sale of those
    small U.S. flags.  Methinks something is brewing for tonight.
    
    pete
3.1370SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Tue Oct 20 1992 12:055
       I also heard on the radio that the Toronto fans plan on 'getting
    even'. Hey, just so everyone doesn't take this stuff TOO seriously! I
    hope it's all in fun. That guy in the color guard is probably still
    doing pushups!
                                     Denny
3.1371and zed vs. z...ROYALT::ASHEBringing Deion and his big bad icebox...Tue Oct 20 1992 15:424
    Isn't that offence?  Not offense?
    
    Sort of like Labour vs. labor...
    
3.1372CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicTue Oct 20 1992 15:5023
>    Isn't that offence?  Not offense?
>    
>    Sort of like Labour vs. labor...


Yeah, from a spelling point of view you are correct, Sir!

I was merely trying to show in a written medium, the differences
in pronounciation 8^)


My dictionary in my office is put out by a Canadian publisher, and
it has all those extra things like silent 'u' and 'c' in place of 's'.


But as my Australian mate Madge is fond of saying


	I don't 'av an accent, mate, YOU do...


'Saw    

3.1373LAGUNA::MAY_BRBad, bad Jackson BrownTue Oct 20 1992 15:564
    'saw's been mating with the dishwashing liquid lady?  It cain't be that
    bad, can it 'saw?
    
    Brews
3.1374AXIS::ROBICHAUDDEVILS, J-E-S-T-S ON SKATESTue Oct 20 1992 16:321
    	Blue Jays win tonight and send Ted & The Accessory home sad.
3.1375'e noo ow ta put da puckinda net, eh?SALES::THILLTue Oct 20 1992 16:454
    Re Saw - That was probably the Meech Lake Accord
    
    Hopefully the Jays Oh-fence will do the job, as long as they don't run
    into a hot goalER.. uh, wrong sport, never mind...
3.1377CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeWed Oct 21 1992 12:156
    
    
    	Jeff Reardon!!!!!!
    
    :*)
    
3.1379...at least it's someone else getting burned...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 21 1992 12:4313
 
    WEEI had a stirring tribute to Reardon this morning entitled "Bob Dylan's 
    Salute to Jeff Reardon", as performed by the master hisself.  The
    signal was fading in and out on me, but the lyrics went something like
    this:
    
    	"How many home run balls must a man give up
    	 Before he admits that he's through?
         The answer, my friend, he's blowin' it again...
         The answer he's blowin' it again..."
    
    glenn
    
3.1380FSCORE::PAVEZKADrink Canada Dry....I'm tryingWed Oct 21 1992 13:0940
    
    re: the flag incident
    
    President Bush apologized and more or less chastised the Marines,
    saying that if it happened the other way around (and the U.S. flag was
    upside down), the Americans would be very upset.
    
    CBS was careful not to show too many crowd shots....in case they caught
    some signs or T-shirts displaying the Stars and Stripes inverted. 
    There was one sign above the scoreboard that said, 
    "The U.S. Marines...the few...the proud....the dyslexic"
    
    
    re: the opening bit of the telecast
    
    I don't know how the Americans viewed it, but myself and a few other
    Canadians were a bit offended with the opening segment before the game.
    That was where one of the CBS reporters showed a bunch of kids playing
    catch and he says that it looks like baseball is finally catching on in
    Canada.  Then they show a closeup of the kids playing catch with a
    hockey puck.  Then he is in the airport going through customs, and the
    customs officer first speaks French (in Toronto....c'mon).  There was
    more chance of the customs officer wearing a turban than there was of
    him speaking French initially.
    Then this `reporter' mentions how cold it is in Canada to be playing
    baseball......wasn't there snow on the ground in Pittsburgh? 
    Minneapolis is north of Toronto, you know.
    The segment ends with the kids being shown again and the reporter says 
    that the kids are getting it right now.  One kid has in his hand `a
    real baseball'...wow!.  Then the camera pans to show a kid up to bat
    with a hockey stick and another kid dressed up as a goalie and acting
    as a catcher.
    
    I know it's all in fun, but it's no wonder that a lot of the American
    public are brainwashed with this crap and think that Canadians are a
    bunch of rubes who speak French and live year round in snow and only know 
    how to play hockey.
    
    
    pete
3.1381Throw me down the stairs my hat.SHARE::DERRYHead is empty &amp; talkin' trash...Wed Oct 21 1992 13:208
    >I know it's all in fun, but it's no wonder that a lot of the American
    >public are brainwashed with this crap and think that Canadians are a
    >bunch of rubes who speak French and live year round in snow and only know
    >how to play hockey.

    You mean everyone isn't a Bob and Doug clone?  (-: 

    /Don's a rube.	
3.1382CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Oct 21 1992 13:2430
>    I know it's all in fun, but it's no wonder that a lot of the American
>    public are brainwashed with this crap and think that Canadians are a
>    bunch of rubes who speak French and live year round in snow and only know 
>    how to play hockey.
    


Pete, 

You have to excuse our press.  Really.

Just imagine that probably half of the people in this country get
their "news" from tabloid publications such as "The Weekly World
News" (sample headline:  Ross Perot Meets with Space Alien), and you
see now why things like that happen.

The US Media can (unfortunately) turn things into a circus.

Actually, the press has reported some baseball stories in a constructive
manner (a recent story I saw on the emergence of baseball in Russia
for example).


Personally, having been to Canada several times, and knowing some
Canadians, I think Canada is a GREAT place, and it bugs me to see the
media acting in an un-neighborly fasion....


JMHO,
'Saw
3.1383EhCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Oct 21 1992 13:3526
    Pete,
    That's pretty sad and ignorant. And we Americans wonder when people
    get upset at our stereotyping of others. And CBS just adding to that
    stereotype. I guess we in New England are lucky to live close enough
    to Canada to appreciate its beauty and the friendlinessof its people.
    I should expand that to all areas of the US that are close to the
    Canadian border. I've beem to Vancouver, Montreal, and to the general
    Toronto area and I can attest to the above statements.  Hell we
    older( wail not too old) Red Sox fans cam remember that the Bosox
    had a farm team in Toronto and the Dodger fans should realize that
    Montreal was one of their farm teams. And we know our neighbors to
    the north know baseball. 
    
    I got a kick out of a picture I saw in the local Boston paper. Two
    Jays fans with a T shirt depicting the US flag upside down with the
    caption " Sory, eh!"  Too funny. 
    
    Now let's forget all this stuff and play ball!
    
    MikeL
    
    P.S. I thought all the Canadians jest drank Canadian and Blue and
    rolled in the snow!  Mucho 8^)'s 
    
    
    
3.1384JARETH::YANKOWSKASSinging in Calgary on July 3rdWed Oct 21 1992 13:3912
    >                                                       Hell we
    > older( wail not too old) Red Sox fans cam remember that the Bosox
    > had a farm team in Toronto and the Dodger fans should realize that
    > Montreal was one of their farm teams
    
    A few U.S. based major league teams still have minor league teams in
    Canada.  The Angels' triple-A team is in Edmonton, there's another
    Pacific Coast League team in Vancouver (White Sox?), and the Tigers'
    double-A team is in London, Ontario.
    
    
    py
3.1385'member THAT one lEe? ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeWed Oct 21 1992 13:4310
    Yabbut lest ya ferget,
    
    The firsted home run Babe Ruth ever hit was in Canada too!
    
    hth,
    
    I remain,
    a_historical_dastatistician_in_training
    Kev
    
3.1386A blue chicken??MR4DEC::WENTZELLJust a little sweetnessWed Oct 21 1992 13:4714
Since I can't stand all the pre-game crap (sounds like I missed a great one 
last night - not) I make sure to check the paper for the game start time (not 
TV coverage start time) and don't tune in until then.  And I'm lucky that 
since I like Sean M and think Tim M is a ok color man, although he seems to be 
a little high on himself most of the time, I can deal with the game-time 
coverage.

I love Canada and Toronto, and have visited SkyDome for a game.  Impressivie 
stadium, although not really what I would consider suited to baseball.  But I 
gotta ask, what the heck is that blue chicken ya got up there running around 
in the stands!?!  I feel embarrassed for you Jays fans everytime I see it. 8^)

Scott
3.1387CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Oct 21 1992 14:0520
Vancouver (eh) is one of the neatest places I've ever been to.

I've been to Montreal once and Sherbrooke once also, but I really liked
Vancouver (eh) the best.

The reason that I always put (eh) after Vancouver (eh), is because of the
two guys that JD and I met who were from Vancouver (eh), who always
said (eh) after they said Vancouver (eh).


Also, the Hartford Wanderers hosted the Vancouver (eh) KATS, a rugby team
from Vancouver (eh), and while a lot of the team hailed from New Zealand,
there were quite a few Canadians that I could talk too.


All this talk about Canada and Vancouver(eh) have me thinking about
a road trip.....


'Saw
3.1388go Jays!ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93-JaKe's p-name to beWed Oct 21 1992 15:1416
    re: French speaking, etc.
    
    Agreed that a lot of American attitudes towards Canada are not that
    great. In all fairness to the French speaking issue, the biggest issue
    in Canada (at least one of them) over the last decade-15 years has been
    the issue of Quebec staying in or separating from Canada. A large part
    of that has to do with the French culture that differentiates Quebec
    from the other parts of Canada. So I can see where that misinformation
    comes from.
    
    The flag thing was really sad. You would think that in the US where the
    flag burning issue was a major issue - amendments and everything -
    people would take more care in respecting the flags of other countries.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1389Canadians are real people tooFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictWed Oct 21 1992 15:155
    Canucks are ok, eh.  My mom and her whole side of her family are
    Hosers.  I used to spend some summers up in New Brunswick, eh.  Also
    been to Montreal and Toronto, eh, to visit relatives.  
    
    Mike eh
3.1390AXIS::ROBICHAUDJeff Rearend strikes again!!Wed Oct 21 1992 15:267
    	All those people who said Gaston wasn't that sharp a manager
    must admit he pulled a slick one to get the Braves to put Rearend
    in the game.  I think CBS/MLB-WWF/CIA/FBI/MilitaryIndustrialComplex
    will want the Braves to tie this one up tonight, so look for lots
    of reaction shots of Ted and the accessory.
    
    				/Don
3.1391Dumb, just dumb...NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 21 1992 16:1317
    
    > All those people who said Gaston wasn't that sharp a manager
    > must admit he pulled a slick one to get the Braves to put Rearend
    > in the game.
    
    Gaston has clearly out-managed Cox but Cox blew this one on his own.
    He could have chosen to have Wohlers (or Stanton) to walk Olerud and 
    then used either one, his choice, to pitch to Maldonado.  His hand 
    wasn't forced; he was apparently hell-bent on using Reardon, with the
    bonus (not much of one) of having Olerud removed from the game.  My
    question at the time was did Cox really think he had so much depth and
    flexibility in his bullpen that he could waste Wohlers and Stanton so 
    casually in the unlikely event that Reardon did get out of that mess?
    Extra innings awaited... 
    
    glenn
    
3.1392Turned it into an art formQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Oct 21 1992 17:299
    
    You're Right,  Hosers are great people.  I grew up in northern Wisc.
    and had many friends and school mates that were from Canada.  Mostly
    their families were in Wisc. for work as loggers and construction as
    those were booming in the late `60's and early `70's.  
    
    BG
    
    And they sure no how to drink beer, too
3.1393CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Oct 21 1992 17:329
Hey, JD and I can tell you about a couple of guys from Vancouver (eh).


We had a good time drinking with them, and I know that as long as JD and
I live, we will ALWAYS be telling that story about our two homies from
Vancouver (eh).....


'Saw
3.1394CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Wed Oct 21 1992 18:3119
    Vancouver is a GREAT town.
    Went drivin' round Vancouver with me buddy BB ( you know of whom I
    speak, 'Saw), looking for a coupla sixpacks a cold Blue. Went
    into this here liquor store and saw no cold beer, only cases of
    warm beer arrayed on the floor. I asked the propriter where his
    cooler was that housed the cold suds. Ho looked at me strangely 
    ( probly trying to place my accent " Have any cold beeyah heeyah)
    and flat out told me I had to find a COLD BEER STORE to git cold
    beer, eh!  I said why did they ( Vancouverites) have a unnecessary
    thang ( in my mind) like a cold beer store and why didn't all
    liqour stores have a cooler where they could house cold beer,
    blah, blah, blah.  The hoser looked at me and said " Now, if
    we all sold cold beer, we wouldn't have any left, now would we
    eh."  That was enough fer me.
    
    Take off
    MikeL
    
    
3.1395PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Oct 21 1992 18:355
3.1396CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Oct 21 1992 18:427
>    The US has not cornered the market on this.  Just look at the stir in
>    Great Britain over the alleged escapades of the royal family being
>    published in the "newspapers" over there.


Amen.  

3.1397NAC::G_WAUGAMANWed Oct 21 1992 18:4922
    
    The Canadian media has had their fun with this World Series and the 
    flag thing in particular, too (glaring headlines decrying "Typical 
    Yank Ignorance", etc.).  Basically I think you're always going to have 
    some elements that take this kind of thing very seriously, and the 
    media will always be right alongside if there's any hint of controversy, 
    anywhere.  But I have a lot of respect for the way the fans present in 
    Toronto last night treated the whole affair.  I have a feeling that if 
    the roles had been reversed, in a lot of US cities the fans would have 
    booed the Canadian anthem, even out of fun, just for the hell of it.  I 
    don't think the average American is that respectful of such institutions.
    Whether that's good or bad is up to the individual, I guess.  Myself,
    I'm a hat-over-heart kinda guy, but I'd just as soon see the national
    anthems at sporting events done away with.
                                    
    I saw where President Bush did something that no national politician
    would ever dream of doing under normal circumstances-- he donned a
    Braves' jacket and declared himself behind Atlanta 100%.  No danger of
    losing votes in Ontario, you see...
    
    glenn
     
3.1398CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicWed Oct 21 1992 18:5313
>    I saw where President Bush did something that no national politician
>    would ever dream of doing under normal circumstances-- he donned a
>    Braves' jacket and declared himself behind Atlanta 100%.  No danger of
>    losing votes in Ontario, you see...
    

George:

	Yep.  I did it.  Felt it would be prudent at this juncture.
	Backing Torawna would be BAD, BAD.  Backing Atlanta is
	good for America.

	God Bless the Atlanta Braves!
3.1399Want change? - 13 days and countingACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93-JaKe's p-name to beWed Oct 21 1992 19:094
    SNL strikes again :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1400FDCV06::KINGI've upgraded my standards.. UP YOURS!!!!!!!Thu Oct 22 1992 11:144
    So... how about them Braves.. Looks like thay don't know how to
    play baseball indoors...
    
    REK
3.1401Dying for some newsMACNAS::PRIDGEChicago Blackhawks Stanley Cup Finalists '92Thu Oct 22 1992 11:533
    
    So what was the score? I am stuck over here in Ireland.
                                                              Pat
3.1402Toronto 2, Atlanta 1LJOHUB::MFFL::Straub...salsa, selzer...Thu Oct 22 1992 12:021
3.1403ThanksMACNAS::PRIDGEChicago Blackhawks Stanley Cup Finalists '92Thu Oct 22 1992 12:294
    
    Jane better get some new prayers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                                                    Pat
    
3.1404Go Jays!ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93-JaKe's p-name to beThu Oct 22 1992 14:0615
    Some details:
    
    Pat Borders hit a HR to give Jays a 1-0 lead. In the 7th, Devon White
    singled with 2 outs and Gruber on 2nd for a 2-0 lead.
    
    Meanwhile Galvine and Key were both pitching very well.
    
    In the 8th. Braves got a lead off double, bunt single, bunt pop-out.
    Groundball that Gruber made a great play on, runner out at first, one
    run in. Ward came in got a strikeout, ball went by the catcher. Runers
    on 1st and 3rd, next batter flied out.
    Henke set the Braves down 1-2-3 in the 9th.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1405These guys want to win...CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadThu Oct 22 1992 14:257
Gotta love Gruber and White.  There are two guys who give 100% all the time.  
Can you imagine Wade Boggs on that switch-direction-charge play in the 8th?  He
woulda been lucky to get a hand on the thing.

Looks like Toronto's year.

=Bob=
3.1406AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowThu Oct 22 1992 14:429
	Major faux pas last night, worse than the UpsideDownFlag incident.
The Braves dressing room got the Blue Jays script and visa versa.  When you 
saw Cito on the phone last night it was the CBS production crew trying to 
tell Gaston to have Henke serve 'em up, but Cito having a hearing problem 
thought he meant warm 'em up so he ignored the directive.  Right now the 
head writer is being summoned from his vacation in Bimini to rewrite the 
entire World Series miniseries.

				/Don
3.1407pondering da future.......CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeThu Oct 22 1992 14:5517
    
    Yabbut I figure this could also go in the Q&A note, or Inquiries a'la
    JaKe but I decided to put it here instead.  So there!
    
    Lasted night during the 9th inning, I began to wonder and ponder
    this little thought (I occasionally have little one's doncha know).
    
    So if'n the Blue Jays win the World Series, will they be invited to da
    WHite House?  By whom?
    
    hep moi!
    
    I remain,
    Interested in dis cause there's no historical precedent!
    Kev
    
    
3.1408MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 22 1992 15:0312
    
     Yup, Hotlanta seemed to think all they had to do was show up and
    accept the trophy. As Gomer Pyle used to say, "Surprise ! Surprise !
    Surprise !" Toronto has pretty darn near everything going for them.
    They have the pitching, timely hitting and they have the not insign-
    ificant element of luck. It would seem to be all over but the crying 
    then again stranger things have happened on the way to Balfour's. 
    Toronto,who's fans just exude class, is fortunate to have guys like 
    Carter and Winfield and Key in the clubhouse though because those guys
    are going to keep everyone else from going out and getting fitted for 
    rings this afternoon - it *is* a seven game series. At least for Hotlanta's 
    sake I hope it is.
3.1409QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 22 1992 16:155
    I'm Jumping ship now...  Go Jays !!!
    
    :^J
    
    BG
3.1410Off to England !KAOFS::R_OBASThu Oct 22 1992 16:247
    Re: Kev,
    
       In today's local paper's editorial the question is exactly like
    yours.
     THE ANSWER:
       The Blue Jays if and when they win the W.S. they are going to
    ENGLAND to visit QUEEN. 
3.1411MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 22 1992 16:3810
    
   >>   In today's local paper's editorial the question is exactly like
   >> yours.
   >> THE ANSWER:
   >>   The Blue Jays if and when they win the W.S. they are going to
   >> ENGLAND to visit QUEEN. 
    
      Is that for real or is it just speculation ? I'm rooting for the Jays
      myself but I wouldn't think the Queen could care less if they won much  
      less be bothered meeting them. 
3.1412NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 22 1992 16:4611
    While Canada will undoubtedly have their own ceremony, I think it would
    be entirely appropriate for the President to invite the Jays to the
    White House, too.  Most of the players are US citizens, for one thing,
    and it'd be dishonorable to make an exception, for another.  'Course 
    Bush has backed himself into the corner with this Braves thing, even 
    likening his campaign to the Braves' NLCS comeback.  Big mistake, 
    George.  That was only the primary...
    
    glenn
    
3.1413Of course it's only a joke !KAOFS::R_OBASThu Oct 22 1992 16:508
    
     No it's not for real I don't think so . As I was saying , Kev has same 
    question in todays editorial (local) Are  the J's going to be
    invited to the White House by whom if' they win the W.S. ? The editor
    made an assumption that they will not be invited so just made a joke
    that the J's will instead head for England to visit the queen.
    
      
3.1414MCIS2::DHAMELThing of beauty and a boy foreverThu Oct 22 1992 16:578
    
    I thought all the winners went to Disneyland.
    
    Probably a lot more fun with Mickey and Minnie than Pres. George or the
    Queen.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.1415MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 22 1992 17:188
 
    >>  -< Of course it's only a joke ! >-
    
     Well smack my crack and call me Dan Quayle ! Could have been for real
     for all I know. Personally, I think Michael Jordan has the right idea 
     about meeting the heads of state - go golfing instead.
      
    
3.1416CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicThu Oct 22 1992 17:406
>     Well smack my crack and call me Dan Quayle !


The imagery this conjures up is sobering at best   ;^)      
    

3.1417KAOFS::R_OBASThu Oct 22 1992 17:445
    
       << Well smack my crack and call me Dan Quayle >>
    
      Nah ! I don't think so....
    
3.1418You're a Sick, Sick, Sick ManQUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesThu Oct 22 1992 17:5610
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
    Sick	Sick		Sick 		!!!!!!!!!
3.1419PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Oct 22 1992 18:436
3.1420CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadThu Oct 22 1992 18:465
3.1421MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 22 1992 18:479
    
  >>  You mean that same Kelly Gruber who's error on a fairly routine ball to
                                      ^^^^^
    
      That should be "whose".
    
    
       _Tommy Brydie for Bob McCullough for John Hendry
           
3.1422Shoot, I'm slippin'CTHQ1::MCCULLOUGHLindsey AND Melanie's dadThu Oct 22 1992 18:480
3.1423PFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Thu Oct 22 1992 18:5211
    
    >>   The Blue Jays if and when they win the W.S. they are going to
    >>ENGLAND to visit QUEEN. 
    
    Why should they want to visit with David Bowie???????
    
    
    Schnort Schitt Schleps
    
    JaKe
    
3.1424Oh what coulda beenPFSVAX::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!Thu Oct 22 1992 18:5610
    I gots to believe that, if it hadn't been fer Leyland's brain cramp and
    subsequent inserting of Stan "I cain't hold a freakin' lead" Belinda
    into the line-up lasted Wednesday, and the Bucs would've won instead of
    everybody in Pgh wanting to break off Belinda's right arm and shove it
    up his a..,this series would be at 2-2 right now, heading for a 7 game 
    showdown, instead of Atlanta playing a pretty weak excuse fer baseball.
    
    JMHO
                                                  
    JaKe
3.1425DECWET::METZGERThu Oct 22 1992 19:0015
Atlanta isn't playing bad baseball. The jays are playing better ball.
Cox is being out managed. Atlanta won games all year long by having 
some of the best pitching in the league. I fully expected their staff
to hold Toronto down to 3 runs a game or less....I did not expect
the Toronto pitching to be so solid that it is holding atlanta to
under 2 runs a game.

Do you honestly think that the Pirates hitting would be scoring
mega runs against the Toronto staff? You can't think that the 
Pittsburgh staff could do as well as Atlanta's in styming the bats
of Toronto?


Metz
3.1426PFSVAX::JACOBIs Ross Perot the Deliverance Dude??Thu Oct 22 1992 19:037
    After watching the Bucs all year long, I gots ta think the Bucs would
    scored more runs than the pathetic Braves have.
    
    IMHO
    
    JaKe
    
3.1427MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 22 1992 19:0712

     Jake, one can only hope that you'll use your psychic powers
    for good and not evil.



    'Saw probably knows *exactly* how the quote goes but it goes
    a little something like this, [anna one anna two] "Of all the
    words of tongue and pen the saddest are these; what might have 
    been."
    
3.1428CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicThu Oct 22 1992 19:2627
>     Jake, one can only hope that you'll use your psychic powers
>    for good and not evil.


Jake, give in to your hate and let it flow within you.  
Come with me to the Dark Side of the Force......

Jake, I am your Father.....


Darth_Chaisaw



>    'Saw probably knows *exactly* how the quote goes but it goes
>    a little something like this, [anna one anna two] "Of all the
>    words of tongue and pen the saddest are these; what might have 
>    been."

Sorry, Tommy, but I cain't come any closer than you.   Next acquisition
for the office cube here is a quotation dictionary.....



'Saw
    

3.1429No sour grapes, Braves are better; just would've been funNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 22 1992 19:3016
    
    Pittsburgh's hitting might be better (they outscored the Braves in the
    regular season and in the playoffs, and lit up everyone not named
    Smoltz), but it's also likely their pitching would have been even 
    worse, maybe even the bullpen (Belinda > Reardon?).
    
    Still, what I wouldn't have given to see the kid Timmy Wakefield
    dancing that flutterball up to the plate for *three games* and 
    spinning guys like Winfield and Carter into the ground.  At the very 
    least, it would have been fun, and it could have been a hell of a 
    story.  I'll admit that I was already visualizing this whole
    circumstance and the matchups before the ball was squeezed for the
    third out...
    
    glenn
     
3.1430CELTIK::JACOBIt's a BURP thang!!!Thu Oct 22 1992 20:2728
    Tommy and Saw, younze guy is too much.
    
    
    I will not give in, though, on my feelings about the Bucs until
    Pittsburgh goes thru its spring thaw, and the knuckleball flies on
    opening day.
    
    I agree also with Glenn, that I was envisioning Wakefield's dancer in
    the Skydome, moving in more directions than my wife's car when she's
    driving on ice.
    
    
    Sigh, 
    sitting here waiting til nexted year, like I have the two previous
    seasons, also, but wonderiing if the Bucs cain find some more unlikely
    heroes to continue holding the seat at the top of the division.
    
    BTW, I read somewhere(surely not a newspaper in Pgh., though) that all
    of the analcysts are saying that Leyland made 3, count 'em, 3, mistakes
    in Atlanta.  One was letting Drabek go as far as he did into the ninth,
    number two was bringing in Belinda, a known high ball pitcher, when
    what the Bucs needed was a ground ball, and as for the third, my mind
    just went blank on that one, damn.  Oh well, If'n I remember it I'll
    get it in here later.
    
    JaKe
    
    
3.1431CAMONE::WAYWe're the dance band on the TitanicThu Oct 22 1992 20:4111
>    I will not give in, though, on my feelings about the Bucs until
>    Pittsburgh goes thru its spring thaw, and the knuckleball flies on
>    opening day.

Jake, don't give in.  That only leads to the Dark Side of the Force.....


Obi-Wan Chainsaw

    
3.1432PFSVAX::JACOBIs Ross Perot the Deliverance Dude??Fri Oct 23 1992 03:058
    Oh great, Atlanta wins and now we gotta watch the PeeWee Herman
    wannabees doing their wank motion whilst sounding like a cow trying to
    pass a London Bus!!!!
    
    Go Toronto!!!
    
    JaKe
    
3.1433NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 23 1992 12:1214
    > Oh great, Atlanta wins and now we gotta watch the PeeWee Herman
    > wannabees doing their wank motion whilst sounding like a cow trying to
    > pass a London Bus!!!!
    
    Tough call between that and watching thousands of Canadian flags
    twirling amidst the jubilant Toronto crowd (hey, I'm a Boston Red Sox
    fan; those Toronto fans have class but I just can't bring myself to
    like it).  Those folks really came out expecting to win last night, I
    think.  The Jays winning in Ted and Janey's playpen sounds like the best
    deal to me...
    
    glenn
    
3.1434MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Oct 23 1992 12:295
    
     I would much rather have seen the Jays win last night. It just never
    seems right when the players go nuts on the last out and the fans in 
    the stands are bumming. Not to mention the fun outside the stadium
    when all those exuberant fans hit the streets.
3.1435PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 23 1992 12:312
    I just knew Morris was due for a blowout.  The Jays can't get the run
    support against those Atlanta starters that Morris needs these days.
3.1436a big ole chicken boneGENRAL::WADEFri Oct 23 1992 12:404
    
    	I loved watching CBS choke on their pregame show.....
    
    Claybroon
3.1437ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93-JaKe's p-name to beFri Oct 23 1992 14:326
    
    Are you talking about last nights pre-game show? I missed it, how'd CBS
    choke??
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1438GENRAL::WADEFri Oct 23 1992 14:566
    
    	Ayup.  They were gushing on and on about the Jays.  Nothing
    	but interviews with them and nothing on the Braves.  At
    	least what I caught anyway.......
    
    Claybroon
3.1439AXIS::ROBICHAUDJackieMo-That'sAllYaGottaKnowFri Oct 23 1992 14:594
    	Claybroon, none of the Braves wanted to be interviewed because
    they were busy reading the script for last night's game.
    
    				/Don
3.1440sweep the last 2FRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictFri Oct 23 1992 15:066
    Nice to see hired gun Jack $. Morri$ is now 0-2 against the Braves this
    year.  Too bad he couldn't pitch the next 2 games.
    
    Go Braves!  Win it for REAL baseball.
    
    Mike
3.1441ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93-JaKe's p-name to beFri Oct 23 1992 15:116
    
    What do you folks out in Arizona know about any baseball, much less
    real baseball?? mucho :-)
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1442TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelFri Oct 23 1992 15:145
    
    Name another state where there is a professional baseball league goping
    on right now.
    
    Brews
3.1443not allowed on pro teams hereFRETZ::HEISERevidence that demands a verdictFri Oct 23 1992 15:151
    Cuz we don't use designated geeks.  
3.1444ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93-JaKe's p-name to beFri Oct 23 1992 15:526
    re: .1442
    
    Georgia!
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1445MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 29 1992 12:186
    
  >> Only more evidence that the game demands more smarts and skill. 
   
     So Glenn, in what ways does baseball require "more smarts" than 
     the other three major sports ?    
    
3.1446CTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Thu Oct 29 1992 12:289
    Don't take no jeenyus to figger out that it is evidently nore smart
    not to put your life and limb on the line playing the major contact
    sports like Fussball and hockey. 
    Then again I've seen "smart" baseball men step up to the plate to git
    drilled by a 90 MPH fastball fer the team ( good luck in Colorady, Don)
    
    8^)
    MikeL
    
3.1447Get Smart!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeThu Oct 29 1992 12:4031
    
    Is it smart to run into a wall at full speed to catch a fly ball?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to hit a pop fly causing a double play?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to miss a bunt sign?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to throw a wild pitch?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to be on the receiving end of incoming spiked shoes?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to position yerself to lose a ball in the lights?
    Nope!
    
    Is it smart to get into fights in a barroom?
    Nope!
    
    
    hth!
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    shortly smart?
    Kev
    
3.1448With hand over heart, with liberty and justice for all...NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 29 1992 13:2336
    
  >> Only more evidence that the game demands more smarts and skill. 
   
   >  So Glenn, in what ways does baseball require "more smarts" than 
   >  the other three major sports ?    
    
    Primarily in the mental battle between the pitcher and batter.  In 
    baseball, *all* players must ultimately participate in this 
    confrontation, on one side or the other.  "Smarts" might not be the 
    best choice of words, so call it mental concentration, or whatever.  
    But the fact remains that the ability to hit a pitched baseball from 
    varying directions and speeds remains one of the most exacting and 
    elusive tasks in sports.  There is no standard physical predictor to 
    assess whether a person might be potentially successful at the task-- 
    such as football's 40-yard-dash time and on-hoof tonnage requirement, 
    or basketball's vertical leap and unwritten height rule (at the vast 
    majority of positions), or hockey's whatever-it-is-that-hockey-
    players-do (skate fast, I guess).  The reason for this is that, quite 
    simply, 90% of the task of hitting a baseball is in the mind, and 
    therefore 90% of pitching is also, in predicting what a hitter is 
    thinking and responding accordingly.
    
    In other sports, there may be positions such as quarterback or point 
    guard which are as mentally demanding, but specialization allows that
    not everyone must master them.  Let's face it, for 99% of us the 
    physical requirements of football and basketball eliminate, at a very
    young age, the chance that we could ever participate at the highest 
    levels in those sports.  Hand a kid a ball, bat and glove and give him 
    the proper instruction, though, and if he's got the ability to block 
    out the pressures of baseball's ultimate one-on-one confrontation and 
    maintain the highest levels of concentration throughout, he stands as 
    good a chance as any other of playing in the big leagues. 
    
    glenn
    
           
3.1449CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicThu Oct 29 1992 14:228
Great note Waugamain!


Just want to point out that if we were born and bred Kiwis, you could
write almost the same thing about rugby.....


'Saw
3.1450MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 29 1992 14:2615
    >> Hand a kid a ball, bat and glove and give him the proper instruction, 
    >> though, and if he's got the ability to block out the pressures of 
    >> baseball's ultimate one-on-one confrontation and maintain the highest 
    >> levels of concentration throughout, he stands as good a chance as any 
    >> other of playing in the big leagues. 
    
       Ain't seen prose that purple since I don't know when. Hitting a base-
       ball IS probably the hardest thing to do in all of sport but I don't
       buy that it's "90% mental". Kirby Pucket and Barry Bonds ain't the
       best hitters in the game because they're the smartest or the best
       concentrators. They're the best because they can put bat on ball and 
       drive it. Baseball players don't have anymore ability to concentrate 
       than football players or basketball players or golfers or canasta
       players and certainly not more than boxers.
    
3.1451NAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Oct 29 1992 17:1427
    
   >    Ain't seen prose that purple since I don't know when.
    
    Hey, I aim to please.
    
   >    Baseball players don't have anymore ability to concentrate 
   >    than football players or basketball players or golfers or canasta
   >    players and certainly not more than boxers.
        
    Let's try logical deduction here.  Forget about the 90% number.  If it 
    is *not* the case that hitting a baseball requires more mental
    concentration per unit of physical ability than stopping an onrushing
    defensive lineman or blocking a jump shot, then why are the positions
    that specialize in these tasks excluded to persons of very specific 
    physical body types?
    
    >   Kirby Pucket and Barry Bonds ain't the
    >   best hitters in the game because they're the smartest or the best
    >   concentrators.  They're the best because they can put bat on ball 
    >   and drive it. 
                                     
    It's a very large part of it.  Both the skills of putting the bat on 
    the ball and being able to drive it are much more technique-based than 
    physical.
    
    glenn
              
3.1452MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrThu Oct 29 1992 17:5728
        
  >> Let's try logical deduction here.  Forget about the 90% number.  If it 
  >> is *not* the case that hitting a baseball requires more mental
  >> concentration per unit of physical ability than stopping an onrushing
  >> defensive lineman or blocking a jump shot, then why are the positions
  >> that specialize in these tasks excluded to persons of very specific 
  >> physical body types?
    
    
      We'll forget the 90% number but only because it's totally indefens-
     ible. You seem to be drawing a corllary between physical size and 
     mental ability and I have to disagree with you. Blocking an onrushing 
     defensive lineman or swatting a jumpshot isn't purely physical or else 
     anyone of the proper size and strength could do it. And that isn't the 
     case. There is a high degree of concentration and technique involved in 
     both of those things. Let your mind wander or take the wrong tack and 
     you're dogmeat. Hitting is the same way. Much of it is technique but much 
     of it is a high degree of hand eye coordination - perhaps more than any 
     other major sport  save hockey. There's a large physical element. It's 
     just a different kind of physical.
 
      This all got started because of a statement by Metz that baseball is 
     the only sport where a Charlie Hough could play at his age or a Kent 
     Hrbek could play in the physical condition he does. And Metz was 100% 
     right. They can still play not because they're Rhodes Scholars but be-
     cause baseball demands a very special set of physical skills and endur-
     ance and foot speed aren't two of them.                  
    
3.1453CNTROL::CHILDSBush, just rasied taxes again. what a guyThu Oct 29 1992 18:147
What no name calling? No personal insults? No na-na-na-na chanting? What kind
of ::Sports discussion is this???

;^)

seriously, Bravo! Tommy and Glenn...it's been great reading from the beachers
3.1454It's sad, ain't it MikeC...AXIS::ROBICHAUDAustralianKiss=FrenchKissDownUnderThu Oct 29 1992 18:161
    
3.1455I KNOW 90% Sir! And you are *NOT* Ninety per-cent!CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeThu Oct 29 1992 18:4714
    
    Just a nit,
    
    I luv this 90% stuff being bantered all around.  Pure Bunk, I say!!!!!
    
    Last time I checked, it's been what 30-40 years since anybody hit
    better than 40% (.400), right?
    
    Sorta changes the arguement, wouldn't you say?????
    
    I remain,
    always amazed by datistics!(tm)
    Kev
    
3.1456PFSVAX::JACOBMets in '93Thu Oct 29 1992 18:5218
    Boxing, now there's a "sport" that takes the ultimate in smarts to get
    into, huh???
    
    Takes an IQ of 150 or above to be able to step into the ring and get
    your brain stem seperated from the rest of your brain and spend the
    rest of your life(how short it may be) imitating broccoli or
    cauliflower.  Or better yet, get your haid beaten around so much it
    turns your brain into mush in your later years in life so when you try
    to speak, you sound like you're under the influence of multiple cases
    of Jack Daniels.  
    
    Yeah, what "smarts" boxing commands to ba able to participate.  What's
    Tyson's IQ, maybe 33 on a good day????
    
    Schnort Schitt Schlepps
    
    JaKe
    
3.1457DECWET::METZGERThu Oct 29 1992 19:2017

Not smarts Jake...concentration...We've all seen what happens to
a boxer when their concentration slips for 2 seconds...POW and
you're done...

I'd say that football requires more intelligence than baseball. 
Those guys have to remember the play and adjust during a short time
span...just because the game requires physical mutants doesn't 
mean they lack intelligence. Baseball requires a higher degree of
concentration rather than intelligence...catchers are about the
only players required to have smarts on a baseball team....

Golf is a quantum leap above any of the major team sports requiring
intelligence.

Metz
3.1458Uh duh was that the Bell?????WMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Thu Oct 29 1992 19:229
    
    
             Yup thats Smarts Jake. Get beat up for 36 minutes and get paid
    6-12 Mil.
    
            Geez when I was in the Navy I got beat up by a marine for about
    that long and he didn't pay me nuthin.  :-)
    
    Chap(PY)
3.1459FDCV06::KINGFri Oct 30 1992 10:163
    Het CHappy, those women Marines are tought.... :-}
    
    REK
3.1460DohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhWMOIS::CHAPALONIS_MTodd Marinovich = Tony Eason.....Fri Oct 30 1992 10:375
    
    
           Yes she was......
    
    Chappy.
3.1461The more that can play, the higher the mental differentiatorNAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 30 1992 14:0445
         
     > We'll forget the 90% number but only because it's totally indefens-
     > ible.
    
    No, it's totally unmeasurable.  There is no known test for separating
    physical aspects from mental aspects and weighing their relative
    contributions to a performed task.  I was throwing out a number for
    argumentative purposes, not to be taken literally.
    
     > You seem to be drawing a corllary between physical size and 
     > mental ability and I have to disagree with you. 
    
    Absolutely not.  I haven't implied anything like that.  What I've said 
    is that the physical requirements for football and basketball eliminate 
    99.9% of the male population from consideration for performing these 
    tasks at a professional level, right off the top.  Let's say by 
    comparison the physical requirements (eyesight, strength) for hitting 
    a baseball eliminate 90%.  This leaves conservatively 100 times more 
    potential "physical" qualifiers for professional baseball than for 
    football and basketball.  In which sport are the non-physical aspects 
    (mental concentration, intelligence in the context of the sport) 
    going to play a larger part in separating the best performers in the
    world from the average Joe?  By logical deduction, the sport that has 
    the lowest physical requirements, the one that allows more average 
    Joes, separated only by mental aspects, a shot at the top.
    
    Or to put it in simpler terms, in horse racing the best jockeys are 
    still only the smartest mentally-tough men under 5'0", 110 lbs, not the 
    smartest metally-tough men period.
    
    > Hitting is the same way. Much of it is technique but much 
    > of it is a high degree of hand eye coordination - perhaps more than any 
    > other major sport  save hockey. There's a large physical element. It's 
    > just a different kind of physical.
    
    It doesn't sound like we really disagree.  Hand-eye coordination is
    mostly if not totally another term for mental concentration (it still
    doesn't cover the guessing-game part to hitting and pitching, though, 
    which doesn't seem to be getting much credit in here-- thousands more
    applicants possess the ability to hit fastballs they know are coming).  
    Hand-eye coordination has little to do with the hand or the eye, but 
    mostly to do with the mind.
    
    glenn
    
3.1462NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 30 1992 14:2620
    
    > This all got started because of a statement by Metz that baseball is 
    > the only sport where a Charlie Hough could play at his age or a Kent 
    > Hrbek could play in the physical condition he does. And Metz was 100% 
    > right. They can still play not because they're Rhodes Scholars but be-
    > cause baseball demands a very special set of physical skills and endur-
    > ance and foot speed aren't two of them.                  
    
    Just one last point here on "The Slob", Charlie Hough.  Film studies
    have shown that a knuckleball pitcher requires the finest mechanics of 
    all pitchers.  Throwing a knuckleball is not simply a case of grabbing
    a ball with a different grip and throwing it up there and discovering
    that it works.  Every mechanical slip-up translates into a potential
    400-foot home run, and it's very difficult to throw strikes with the
    thing in the first place.  This is another skill that I consider to be 
    mostly mental, but I guess could possibly be semantically described as 
    "physical".
    
    glenn
    
3.1463CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicFri Oct 30 1992 14:3011
Just like software blurs into hardware through a gray area of microcode,
so does the brains "thought" of an action when it becomes the action.


Pitching, the short game in golf, and other things I've probably not mentioned,
are, in my mind, a combination of concentration, and mind-control of
important physio-mechanical things.....


JMHO,
'SAw
3.1464PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollFri Oct 30 1992 14:306
    I have to question Metz' rating of the intelligence required of the
    average football player.  I've played football, and believe me, it
    wasn't that mentally taxing.  You're always told exactly what to do. 
    The toughest thing might be to memorize the plays that are being sent
    in by the coaching staff.  Blocking schemes overlap for many of the
    plays.
3.1465MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Oct 30 1992 15:163
    
     Still don't agree with you Glenn but this argument is beginning to 
    take on an ugly "Dean Smithian " futility.
3.1466More food for thought...NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 30 1992 15:3810
            
    Here's another angle: why does it take the average baseball player
    more years of training at the college and professional levels to reach
    a major-league level of proficiency?  Why do pitchers with great stuff,
    even the greatest pitchers ever, almost without exception come into the 
    big leagues and perform poorly (the same is also true of most young
    hitters)?
    
    glenn
     
3.1467SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Fri Oct 30 1992 15:463
    ...because they're not as skilled as athletes as players in other
    sports?
                                    Denny
3.1468NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 30 1992 16:0220
    
    > ...because they're not as skilled as athletes as players in other
    > sports?
    
    Whether they are or they're not, I'm talking about the difference in
    performance between a rookie (often a 25-year-old rookie) and a 
    five-year veteran.  If they're not skilled when they come in somehow
    they get skilled, or at least "much more skilled" (if you still don't 
    believe them to be ;-).  Or on the other side, if athletes in other 
    sports are required to be equally skilled mentally, why don't they 
    generally show the same leaps of improvement with major-league 
    experience (specialized positions like quarterback, point guard, goalie 
    excepted)?
    
    Or are 22-year-old basketball and football players *more* mentally 
    prepared for the big leagues?  That's one possible explanation, the
    other being the demands of the sports...
    
    glenn
    
3.1469SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Fri Oct 30 1992 16:085
       Athletes in the other sports usually play at a high level in
    college. This is like 4 years in the minor leagues. In some cases,
    a much higher level than the baseball minors.
    
                                 Denny
3.1470The Squared CircleAXIS::CHAPPELCalling Dr.Howard,Dr.Fine,Dr.HowardFri Oct 30 1992 16:187
3.1471FDCV06::KINGFri Oct 30 1992 18:173
    Oh yeah... Right...
    
    REK
3.1472CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicFri Oct 30 1992 18:187
Well, I have seen some things in the squared circle that are pretty
athletic.

The strenght factor alone can be impressive at times.....


'Saw
3.1473MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrFri Oct 30 1992 18:446
    
     "My name is Barry Bonds and when I'm not using my incredible powers
      of concentration to hit baseballs - I can usually be found bending 
      spoons, boring holes in concrete or freaking my dog out by moving 
      his dish. All with the power of my amazing brain. Kreskin ? He's a
      punk."
3.1474...and golf is *NOT* a sport!AXIS::ROBICHAUDAustralianKiss=FrenchKissDownUnderFri Oct 30 1992 18:550
3.1475golf spelled backwards might beCTHQ1::LEARYJackie Sherrill won't STEER ya wrong.Fri Oct 30 1992 18:581
    
3.1476CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicFri Oct 30 1992 19:014

	I think ya hear me knockin', I think I'm comin' in,
	and I'm bringin' Barry and his big bad brain with me!
3.1477Only for Slob fains Mike!AXIS::ROBICHAUDAustralianKiss=FrenchKissDownUnderFri Oct 30 1992 19:021
    
3.1478Barry da main!NAC::G_WAUGAMANFri Oct 30 1992 20:145
    
    You callin' Barry dumb, Tommy?  That won't score points wif me either!
    
    glenn
    
3.1479DECWET::METZGERFri Oct 30 1992 21:0818
You may have played football Mac but I doubt you've ever had to know a 
Bill Walsh or a Mouse Davis caliber offense...Even remembering the plays
is more intelligence than the average baseball player needs...with a 70%
chance of failure at every at bat there can't be too much intelligance 
involved :-)


Glen..next you'll be telling me that Hough is in excellent shape and it
just appears that he's about to drop dead at any moment...what other sport
can you pan into the bench/dugout and see a coach killing himself with
a cigarette or players generating mouth cancer cells by the thousands...
Yep..them baseball players are real intelligent :-)

Co-ordinated? Yes..intelligent...I don't think so...

Metz

3.1480MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrMon Nov 02 1992 12:4414
    
    >> You callin' Barry dumb, Tommy?  
    
      Not at all. Just remarking on his amazing powers of concentration
      which are not unlike those of the great eastern mystics under whom 
      he studied. When he goes into that trance just before the pitch is
      delivered and his eyes roll back in his head and you can see him
      mouth the words, "Be the ball". It's chilling. As a matter of fact 
      I'm surprised more clubs don't drop their hitting coaches in favor 
      of mentalists. 
        
              
    
    
3.1481Both non-athletic and dumb...that's why they make the $3M...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 02 1992 12:4514
> Glen..next you'll be telling me that Hough is in excellent shape and it
> just appears that he's about to drop dead at any moment..
    
    No, not at all.  He's a slob.  This is the whole point, though.  It
    wasn't me who started this thread by claiming that baseball players 
    aren't "athletes".  Well, at the highest average salaries in sports,
    with no shortage of willing candidates from all over North America to 
    take his or any other "non-athletic" player's job away, the guy's still 
    around.  So if he's not an "athlete", he's around for some other reason, 
    then.  What is that reason?  You can't have it both ways...
    
    glenn
    
3.1482Now if they could find a cure for Matt Young...NAC::G_WAUGAMANMon Nov 02 1992 12:469
    
      > As a matter of fact        
      > I'm surprised more clubs don't drop their hitting coaches in favor 
      > of mentalists.                                 
    
    It worked for John Smoltz!  ;-)
    
    glenn
    
3.1483MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrMon Nov 02 1992 12:582
    
       Sports psychologists aren't exclusive to baseball.
3.1484MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrMon Nov 02 1992 13:1116
    
    >> Well, at the highest average salaries in sports, with no shortage of 
    >> willing candidates from all over North America to take his or any other
    >> "non-athletic" player's job away, the guy's still around. 
    
        It's not exactly news that baseball has long been losing the best
        athletes to football and basketball. Most really good athletes find
        a sport where you spend the vast majority of the time waiting for 
        something to happen, even when you're on the field, boring. Charlie
        has mastered a few skills unique to baseball. It's that simple.
        He's no genius any more than most middle linebackers (maybe the 
        most intense creatures in sport) are. 
    
        I thought this string was dead.    
    
    
3.1485PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Nov 02 1992 13:1814
3.1486CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicMon Nov 02 1992 13:3417
>    Then why do they choose football?

For what it's worth, it's my opinion that there are few athletes who
have the opportunity to make a conscious choice.

MOST athletes who make the big leagues have played that sport for years,
and while they may have played other sports, they play that one sport
because it is their favorite.   I'd say there are very few people who
have to make a choice between football and hoops, or baseball and hoops,
or football and baseball.   There are even fewer like Bo and Deion.

The majority of athletes play their favorite sport and see how far it
gets them......


'Saw

3.1487MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrMon Nov 02 1992 13:5213
 >> For what it's worth, it's my opinion that there are few athletes who
 >> have the opportunity to make a conscious choice.

 >> MOST athletes who make the big leagues have played that sport for years,
 >> and while they may have played other sports, they play that one sport
 >> because it is their favorite.   
    
    With all due respect, these two statements seem to contardict each
    other. If it's their "favorite" then they must have made a conscious
    decision to play it. No ?
    
    
3.1488CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicMon Nov 02 1992 14:4338
>    With all due respect, these two statements seem to contardict each
>    other. If it's their "favorite" then they must have made a conscious
>    decision to play it. No ?


Well, not really.

I guess what I'm getting at, is that around here, kids starts playing
sports really early.   Most parents let their kids play a lot of different
sports (baseball, soccer, football, hockey, lacrosse), and they usually
develop a favorite.   That tends to be their sport of choice.

Kids don't really grasp some of the issues we've been talking about
until they are late into high school.

"Choosing" a sport like baseball, where you might get a lot of years
of playing in, as opposed to hockey, where the average career is a lot
lower, is not a really strong conscious decision at that age, I don't
believe.

It is a decision, yes, but not the kind of decision I think we're talking
about.

Decisions I made at 18 were no where near as informed or smart as I make
now.    


My point was, given that fact, that there are few athletes who are good
enough to have to make a conscious decision between hoops and football.
Most say "Well, I'm a football player" or "I'm a basketball player"....



Don't mind me, I'm having problems expressing myself today!  

'Saw
    

3.1489MSBCS::BRYDIEAccidentally like a martyrMon Nov 02 1992 15:462
    
     What the hell are you talking about, Chainsaw ?
3.1490CAMONE::WAYWe're the Dance Band on the TitanicMon Nov 02 1992 15:4914
>     What the hell are you talking about, Chainsaw ?


I don't know.  If I knew, do you think I'd be here?

Hell, no, if I really knew what I was talkinga bout, I'd be writing
for a magazine, or books or something, making tons of money, and
not having to worry about getting laid off by some guy who has problems
deciding if he wants to buy a red Porsche or a black Lotus, and who
wouldn't know a structure, union, or b-tree if it bit him in the
gluteus maximus......


8^)
3.1491PhilliesSALEM::HARRIS_KTue Nov 03 1992 15:117
    Has anyone heard any rumors on who the Phillies will protect?? I know
    they are not releasing the lists to the public, however local papers
    usually get a good idea at who the players are.
    
    Thanks in advance 
    
    Kenn
3.1492ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Nov 09 1992 16:4710
    
    The bizarre saga of the SF Giants being sold gets wierder. A letter,
    purported to be from Horace Stonehams widow, was sent to owners
    indicating that Stoneham would not have wanted the Giants moved.
    Someone call her up and she said she had no knowledge of this letter.
    Turns out that her granddaughter, who is helping the folks who want to
    keep ther Giants in SF sent out the letter.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1493Serves him right!SALES::THILLMon Nov 09 1992 17:3713
>    purported to be from Horace Stonehams widow, was sent to owners
>    indicating that Stoneham would not have wanted the Giants moved.
    
    Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! I'm sure ol Horace is
    rolling over in his grave with the thought of uprooting tradition and 
    moving a well-established franchise to a new city!
    
    Did anyone see the "SI Classic" a few weeks ago that had an article on
    the NY Giants last home game in the Polo Grounds? The fans hung around
    the field, for several hours after the game, and eventually stormed
    Stoneham's office. 
    
    Tom         
3.1494ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Nov 09 1992 17:404
    That was a funny SI article. Too bad it was not written in 1957.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1495starting in TampaHBAHBA::HAASGandhi Cactus JuiceMon Nov 09 1992 17:417
Meanwhile, Tampa is starting to sell advertisement, tickets and otherwise
setting up shop. The only real thing that the stay-in-SF crowd have
going for them is that the "normal" procedures may not have been followed
in making the offer to sale. But the sale itself was approved in detail
and at this point the Tampa offer is the only signed deal.

TTom
3.1496MCIS2::DHAMELThing of beauty and a boy foreverMon Nov 09 1992 17:439
    
    A couple of months ago while picking up a relative at Logan who was
    flying in from Florida, I noticed that the T-shirts of the disembarking
    passengers were pretty much divided equally into "Disney World",
    "Florida Marlins" and "Tampa Bay Giants."  Maybe those babies will be
    worth something some day.
    
    Dickstah
    
3.1497Scheduling nightmareSALES::THILLMon Nov 09 1992 17:5116
    So what does this mean for the League and scheduling? Seems like quite
    a mess, since this was the year they were going to switch divisions
    anyway. Would the TB Giants stay in the west or go east with (I
    suppose) Cinncinnati staying put?
    
    1992 East	      1993 East		1992 West      1993 West
    Montreal ------------>              Los Angeles  ----->
    New York ------------>              San Diego -------->
    Philadelphia -------->              Houston ---------->
    Pittsburgh ---------->              San Francisco ?---> 
    St Louis                 <--------? Cinncinati ?------>
    Chicago                  <--------- Atlanta        Chicago
                      Florida                          St. Louis
                      Tampa Bay?                       Colorado
    
    Tom
3.1498ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Mon Nov 09 1992 18:258
    For 1993, Giants would stay in the NL West. Realignment might happen
    for 1994. Cubs should have fewer complaints since there will only be 2
    NL teams on the West Coast so they will probably end up with fewer
    games out in California then they did through 1992. But the Cubs have
    been so obstinate so far, logic may have nothing to do with it.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1499just so "no" to Florida!CSTEAM::FARLEYHail to Bill Long and TcMWed Nov 11 1992 15:198
    
    I'm suprised that there hasn't been any discussion here about the vote
    of the owners to prevent the Giants from moving.
    
    Looks like Florida's gonna wait s'more.....
    
    Kev
    
3.1500nice to hear!E2BIG::francusMets in '93Wed Nov 11 1992 15:523
See tha Baseball notesfile for the SF-TB Giants discussion.

The Crazy Met
3.1502CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Wed Nov 11 1992 17:138
Kev -

As you can imagine, I'm happy that Tampa-St. Bleat got dumped again, wif ripped
fishnet stockings and smeared mascara, reeking of cheap wine, as the Bleatster
gets ready to hit the street again, to lay down and bare its soul to the next
'john' coming down the street.  oh-fer-seven and still counting.

JD
3.1503PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 11 1992 17:164
    I knew JD would come up with something...
    
    Actually he's going to have to drop this one too since the Giants are
    staying in SF and Tampa will get an expansion team in 1997.
3.1504CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Wed Nov 11 1992 17:3212
Mac -

No problems if Tampa gets an expansion team.   Maybe now they'll stop trying
to steal teams.

If you want, Maccy, I'll send my notes to you for prior approval.   I guess
if I put in numerous Bernie Kosar notes it would okay.

Oh, and Maccy, you can always next unseen.  YIP!


JD
3.1505PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Nov 11 1992 17:353
3.1506CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Wed Nov 11 1992 17:421
You can always stop being a moderator.
3.1507LAGUNA::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Nov 11 1992 17:529
3.1508NOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!QUASER::HUNTERDenvers Line, Maddox, Dan ReevesWed Nov 11 1992 18:039
    I'd never want to be a FM for this conference...  I couldn't
    stand reading all the meaningless BS all you other guys put
    into this place.
    
    
    I Remain,
    carefully pondering every note I enter  (sorry Kev)
    
    BG
3.15091997 expansion? Who says?SALES::THILLWed Nov 11 1992 18:5811
    So is this 1997 expansion just another way for MLB to get "St. Bleat" off 
    their backs? I haven't heard a word about yet another expansion on the
    horizon. Jeez, people complain enough that there isn't enough quality
    pitching around, I cain only imageine what the cries will be then. 
    
    Since St Bleat will be guaranteed a franchise, is it safe to say it
    will be in the AL, so the southeast wont be totally NL country? What
    other cities are in the running. Oh boy! I cain't wait for yet another
    awful team called the Washington Senators...
    
    Tom  
3.1511ACESMK::FRANCUSMets in '93Thu Nov 12 1992 15:327
    
    Tommy,
    
    you don;t want to hear the other side; it's the same as this one.
    
    The Crazy Met
    
3.1512CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Thu Nov 12 1992 17:0913
Tommy

So sorry.  I apologize.   Mea Culpa.   Ever think of becoming a moderator.

I wish Tampa got the franchise.   I hope it goes to court.  I hope baseball
loses it anti-trust exemption.  I hope San Francisco falls into the ocean for
allowing a godless lifestyle to flourish.   I hope all baseball teams leave
the north to play in domed, astroturf southern cities.   I hope this makes
everyone happy.  They seem so upset all the time.

Love and kisses.

JD
3.1513R U lonely toniiight??????CSTEAM::FARLEYHail to Bill Long and TcMThu Nov 12 1992 19:5212
    
    JD,
    
    So how long has your wife been away?
    
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    knowledgable about hormones
    Kev
    
3.1514CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Fri Nov 13 1992 12:029
Kevin,

Great note.  I noted some humour in it.   Always looking for a good old-fashioned
chuckle.

I appreciate a good note.

I remain, indebted to you
JD
3.1515Get much sleep?CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Nov 13 1992 12:4010
    JD,
    
    Obviously she returned last night eh?
    
    ;^)
    
    I remain,
    holding back a big barf!
    Kev
    
3.1516JD's the anti-T!GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Fri Nov 13 1992 13:214
    
    	Somebody slap JD upside his haid!  Snap out of it man!
    
    Claybroon
3.1517MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionWed Dec 02 1992 11:383
    
      Baseball's executive committee has appointed a four member panel
     to investigate the allegations against Cincinnati owner Marge Schott.
3.1518PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckWed Dec 02 1992 13:416
    re-.1
    Why don't they just appoint a firing squad and shoot the insolent
    b_tch???
    
    JaKe
    
3.1519TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Dec 02 1992 13:515
     
    "investigate allegations"?!  It's already been proven in court, and she
    admitted to it.  What more could they want?
    
    
3.1520FRETZ::HEISERJesus was a blonde too!Wed Dec 02 1992 15:061
    Is Marge Schott really Johnny Most's twin sister?
3.1521PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollWed Dec 02 1992 15:237
3.1522Perjury?SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Wed Dec 02 1992 15:305
       IF you read the stories today Mac, she's admitted to some of the
    slurs under oath (in depositions). And the Hitler comment was to a NY
    Times reporter. She's denying some of the statements she's made under
    oath.
                                     Denny
3.1523Fireless firing squadCTHQ::MCCULLOUGHI survived Chuck E. CheeseWed Dec 02 1992 16:0714
3.1524SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Wed Dec 02 1992 16:2312
       I was listening to Dale Arnold on WEEI while I was on the road
    yesterday. Some guy called in with this little tidbit about Margebo.
    She was attending an owners meeting in Chicago a few years ago. Seems
    she got there an hour early and was hanging around the conference room. 
    After a while she was overheard in a conversation with the Red's
    office: "why didn't anyone tell me there was an hour difference between
    Cinci. and Chicago!?"
      
    re:.1523
       There might not be a commish, but you'd think the NL pres' would do
    or say SOMETHING!!
                                Denny
3.1525AXIS::ROBICHAUDAHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboroWed Dec 02 1992 17:004
    	ESPN reported last night that the call in radio polls are running
    in favor of Schott 3-1.  
    
    				/Don
3.1526GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseWed Dec 02 1992 17:1813
    While I think what Marge said was stupid and ignorant, I also find it
    quite similar to offending other minority groups with team nicknames.
    Just because the Native Amnerican groups aren't as large (and dont play
    in baseball games or attend in any large numbers), it seems as though
    baseball is saying it's ok to use a name that offends a small minority
    group, just don't piss off a large one.  Baseball even uses the same
    excuse as Schott did, in that she said "I didn't me it in an offensive
    way." If baseball (and other professional sports) wants to clean this
    stuff up, they need to do it for all minorities, not just the large
    ones. 
    
    Dennis Faust
    
3.1527CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Wed Dec 02 1992 17:461
Well said Dennis.  
3.1528TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelWed Dec 02 1992 21:056
    
    WHich baseball nickname is derogatory?  I've heard as many pro-Braves
    votes as anti's.  I heard some boob say that since Schott's team's 
    name is the Reds, we shouldn't be surprised.
    
    Brews
3.1529GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseWed Dec 02 1992 22:4713
    re: .1528
    
    I believe I remember seeing pickets on TV outside a site where the
    Atlanta team was playing. If *any* Native American groups find the
    nickname offensive, they should change it. I feel that since somegroups
    find the name offensive, it's just as bad as if they had a nickname
    like the words that Marge used.
    
    Sure Marge is a racist pig, but so is MLB and the NFL. What's new about
    that?
    
    Dennis Faust
      
3.1530MCIS2::DHAMELMarge Schott: Designated HitlerThu Dec 03 1992 13:172
    
    
3.1531TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelThu Dec 03 1992 13:297
    
    I think we've been through this before, but, I disagree.  The groups
    from the reservations here in AZ said they had no problem with the name
    Braves.  They went on to say that a large portion of Indians either
    didn't care or thought the name Braves was positive and that most of
    the people in the anti protests were white rent-a-mob members who show
    up at these type of events.
3.1532CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Thu Dec 03 1992 13:5623
Bruce -

While that may be so, to some extent - the real outcry (headed by American
Indians, and not rent-a-mobbers) is that it perpetuates stereotyping of
the American Indian.  Hey, not *all* Irish mind the stereotype of the
drunken leprechan, or maybe not *all* afro-americans mind the various
stereotypes - but that doesn't make them right, nor does it make it a case
for easy dismissal.

It seems that for every Indian group offended, someone can trot out another
group that says nothing is wrong.  It wouldn't be a tough thing for the
teams to change their names anyway.  After all, how many people think of
American Indians and relate them to Washington DC, Cleveland, Kansas City
or Atlanta, for instance?    Various colleges have changed their names, and
using a PAC10 example, Stanford hasn't seemed to suffer any loss of dignity
or anything since changing.

And repeatedly, the groups have said they find the name "Redskins" to be the
most offensive, and have taken offense wiht the painting of faces, the tomahawk
chop (now, would ANYONE be heart-broken if that went away), the feathered 
headdress, etc....

JD
3.1533PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 03 1992 15:163
    The hue and cry I've heard in regard to American Indians and
    professional sports have revolved around Braves fans use of the
    tomahawk chop and the Washington NFL team's use of the name Redskin.
3.1534Hep Me!GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Thu Dec 03 1992 15:338
    
    JD,
    
    	What was Stanford prior to *Cardinal*?
    
    	Why isn't it plural?
    
    Claybroon
3.1535PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 03 1992 15:343
3.1536CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Thu Dec 03 1992 15:427
Mac 0

They have protested at KC Chiefs games also.  Since I work and sometimes run
with a guy onthe American Indian Council, I do get some first hand information.

Stanford Cardinal is the color, I believe.
JD
3.1537Bill Cardinal Walsh?HBAHBA::HAASGandhi Cactus JuiceThu Dec 03 1992 15:454
They picked Cardinal cause the mathematicians threatened a protest if
they used Ordinal.

TTom
3.1538Bigotry like Schott's is the big problem, not the mascotsNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Dec 03 1992 16:0116
    
    I think the biggest difference between the American Indian
    controversies and the Marge Schott situation is the intent.  It's the
    intent-- what's behind the symbology-- that really matters in race
    relations, no?  Yes, most of us need to become educated on American
    Indian history and culture, and some of these sports stereotypes get in
    the way of that, and should be done away with.  However, I don't see 
    them as a conscious, racist assault on American Indians, which is
    what you're dealing with in an ingrained bigot like Schott, whose
    motives are hateful, period.  The Indian mascots represent 
    misunderstanding and insensitivity, the likes of Schott represent 
    institutionalized racism.  Big difference, in my opinion, that's
    reflected in the response of the targets in both cases...
    
    glenn
      
3.1539To answer your questionSCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Thu Dec 03 1992 16:222
      They used to be the Stanford Indians.
                                 Denny
3.1540GRANPA::DFAUSTWith every wish,there comes a curseThu Dec 03 1992 18:387
    re: .1538
    
    But Marge already said that she had no racist intent, either. But then,
    that's what all the racists say, like Atlanta and Washington.
    
    Dennis Faust
    
3.1541CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Dec 03 1992 18:5526
>    that's what all the racists say, like Atlanta and Washington.
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Well, I'd like to suggest some new names for these teams.

How 'bout the

	Washington TrouserWeasels

and the

	Atlanta Ferns.



That should keep everyone happy, I think....



8^)


'Saw
    

3.1542We're trivializing the repulsiveness of Schott's actionsNAC::G_WAUGAMANThu Dec 03 1992 20:2519
    > But Marge already said that she had no racist intent, either. But then,
    > that's what all the racists say, like Atlanta and Washington.
    
    I guess it's up to one's own judgment, then.  Do you believe Marge
    Schott?  With witnesses coming out of the woodwork everyday to testify 
    otherwise, did poor old Marge really harbor no ill will at all?  
    
    And on the other hand, if Atlanta and Washington and all their fans are 
    "racists", then by some remote standard or another we all are, I suppose, 
    and there's no point in making any distinctions, and by extension, in
    taking any particular action to make any progress.  I don't go along with 
    that kind of relativism.  I think the examples are worlds apart, and
    baseball's race problem is still primarily where it's always been, with 
    the poor hiring record of blacks in the front offices, not with the
    Cleveland and Atlanta mascots.
    
    glenn
     
3.1543CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsThu Dec 03 1992 20:5744
>    And on the other hand, if Atlanta and Washington and all their fans are 
>    "racists", then by some remote standard or another we all are, I suppose, 
>    and there's no point in making any distinctions, and by extension, in


We ALL *are* racist to some degree.  I firmly believe that.

Human beings have a fear (neurosis???) about things that are different.
We all are distrustful (to some degree) of people who are different.

It need not be based on race either.  Look at the problems right now with
the Neo-Nazis in Germany.  It's not just race they have a problem with,
it's all foreigners.   They are afraid (among other things) of what they
perceive to be the weakening of their culture through mixing with others.
(I'm not saying that philosophy is right, but that's what I perceive part
of their philosophy is).


Nowadays, with political correctness, and second guessing, you almost
begin to wonder about things.   For example, I'm very proud of my
heritage, of my Scottish ancestry and stuff like that.  However, because
I'm white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant, I have to wonder if some folks would
perceive my pride as racism.

I don't know what it's like to be black, but I'm sure that some folks
who are not black might perceive the natural pride of black people in
their heritage to be racist also.


It is such a fine line that we tread.......  Personally, I would hope,
in my heart, that we all have room inside of us to appreciate other
cultures and races, but to also not be afriad to be proud of our own....



Now, as far as Marge goes, if she DID say the things she did, then I
like what one player agent suggested -- sentence her to 6 months of
working with Dave Parker to work for the underprivileged youth of
Cincinnati, and then 6 months on a Kibbutz(sp??) in Israel.....



Sorry about getting on my soapbox,
'Saw
3.1544I like races, 'specially the mile! ;^)CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Dec 04 1992 11:391
    
3.1545CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Fri Dec 04 1992 11:5228
Glenn -

I agree with much you bring forth.

However, the attitude shown by many concerning mascots, the tomahawk chop,
etc., are really parts, or attitudes, of the overall problem.  The fact taht
folks don't understand why these would be offensive shows the how deep 
our racial ignorance can go.  

I think many folks now use "PC" as a scapegoat, analagous how groups use
the media as a scapegoat or a reason for the problems.  

Stereotypes abound - the happy drunken irishman, the mafia gangster Italian,
the stupid Polack, the Uncle Tom, the proud drunken suicidal savage, 
the dumb as nails rural dweller, etc...

Many folks take these stereotypes as the truth, and form their opinions
of groups by them.  Then they don't understand when those groups protest
or have a problem with those stereotypes.

Perhaps folks like Marge Shott, or Al Campanis, are thrown into the 
crucible of controversy is because they say things that many others feel,
and are ashamed or embarrassed to hear these secret feelings put into the
public eye.

JMHO.

JD
3.1546MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionFri Dec 04 1992 11:5816
   >> Now, as far as Marge goes, if she DID say the things she did, 
   >> then I like what one player agent suggested -- sentence her to 
   >> 6 months of working with Dave Parker to work for the underpriv-
   >> ileged youth of Cincinnati, and then 6 months on a Kibbutz(sp??) 
   >> in Israel.....

       It'd probably be a waste of time. You can't undo sixty-some-odd
      years of ingrained ignorance in one year (if ever). I just hope
      that some good comes of this. As pathetic as the Campanis incident
      was, it pointed up a mindset amongst some of the powers that be in
      baseball and served as a catalyst for some small measure of change.
      Blacks and Jews and other minorities can go on all day and night
      about the pervasiveness of racism and anti-semitism  but nothing 
      brings the point home like a bigot with a loud mouth. 
    
3.1547AXIS::ROBICHAUDAHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboroFri Dec 04 1992 12:107
    	Everybody will say how terrible Marge Schott is and try to get
    her out of baseball, and some folks will think that by getting her
    out things will be better, but my opinion is that after the furor
    dies down baseball, and other sports will continue their practice
    of rarely hiring minorities in front office positions.
    
    				/Don
3.1548MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionFri Dec 04 1992 12:1121
  >> Perhaps folks like Marge Shott, or Al Campanis, are thrown into 
  >> the crucible of controversy is because they say things that many 
  >> others feel, and are ashamed or embarrassed to hear these secret 
  >> feelings put into the public eye.

     Folks like Marge Schott and Al Campanis are thrown into the `cruci-
     ble of controversy' because they wield at least some small measure
     of power. Their prejudices directly affect people's livelihoods.
     When Al says that maybe blacks are somehow genetically incapable of
     being managers, it is very different from some truck driver saying the
     same thing. Al had the power to influence who could and could not
     manage a baseball team. A truck driver doesn't wield that power.
     When Marge Schott is exposed as a bigot and then it is revealed that
     only one out of the forty-five folks in the Reds' front office is a 
     minority, it doesn't take a giant leap of logic to figure that there
     may be discriminatory hiring practices going on. If the number of
     minorities in the Reds' front office was more reflective of society
     as a whole or baseball in particular then the case against her, IMO,
     would be much weaker and maybe even moot.
    
3.1549CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Fri Dec 04 1992 12:2310
Tommy -

I agree with with what you said.  As always, its hard to read 'tone' into
notes, but my assumption on your tone is that you misunderstood where I'm
coming from.  I don't condone Schott or Campanis.  I don't think they are
being picked on or anything.  Just said that their statements may cause such
uproar for more than one reason - one being the obvious, which you stated -
ignorance, etc., the other being guilt.

JD
3.1550MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionFri Dec 04 1992 13:117
    JD, as far as I can tell you believe that a number of people 
   who are voicing concern over the Schott issue are doing so be-
   cause they feel guilty about having the same feelings themselves.
   If that's your point then I didn't misunderstand what you said, I 
   just don't agree.
    
3.1551CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Fri Dec 04 1992 13:2614
Tommy -

I do believe some guilt is involved, yes.  I can't buy that all these folks
are 'shocked', since the attitude displayed by Marge ins't exactly 'unique'.

People are outraged, yes.  But how many of these outraged folks will simply
slip back into status quo land once the fuhrer (okay, bad pun) is over?  

Dumping Marge won't mean anything if the root problems aren't addressed.  For
every Al Campanis and Marge schott that comes out into the open by saying
something stupid in public, how many are there that have the same type
feelings, but put on a facade?

JD
3.1552CSTEAM::FARLEYMegabucks Winner WannabeeFri Dec 04 1992 13:5712
    
    Don't wanna make any inflammatory statements but aren't there 13 major
    league BBall teams who have NEVER had a minority in either the front
    office or as a manager?
    
    btw - Marge's team isn't among them!
    
    I remain,
    Kev_for_Mac ~/~
    
    ;^)
    
3.1553GIAMEM::LEFEBVREPCG Product ManagementFri Dec 04 1992 15:114
    Can someone please explain to my WHY Marge should be stripped of her
    right to make a living even if she made everyone one of the comments?
    
    Mark.
3.1554TORREY::MAY_BRInside IntelFri Dec 04 1992 15:276
    
    What do you mean right to make a living?  She still has the ability to
    marry someone with money like she did before.  She may have limited her
    options with what she said, though.
    
    Brews
3.1555MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionFri Dec 04 1992 15:3411
    
   >> Can someone please explain to my WHY Marge should be stripped of her
   >> right to make a living even if she made everyone one of the comments?
    
      If'n Large Marge is forced to sell her share of the Reds, chance are
      she won't end up shabbily dressed, pushing a shopping cart filled with 
      her belongings around Cincinnati, drooling all over herself and mumbling
      loudly about how she used to be somebody. She'll still be a very wealthy
      lady. The question is, though, what is a fitting punishment ? Or is what
      she's done even punishable ? I do know that if she worked for DEC or any
      other private company her butt would already have been fired.
3.1556SCHOOL::RIEUSay Goodbye George!Fri Dec 04 1992 15:375
>      If'n Large Marge is forced to sell her share of the Reds, chance are
    
      That's Mark's point Tommy. HOW can she be 'forced' to sell? Although
    I hope that somehow she can be, I don't think our laws allow it.
                                   Denny
3.1557MSBCS::BRYDIEThe Mothership ConnectionFri Dec 04 1992 15:4711
    
  >> That's Mark's point Tommy. HOW can she be 'forced' to sell? Although
  >> I hope that somehow she can be, I don't think our laws allow it.
    
     Denny, in my reply I asked if what she's done is even punishable.
     Under constitutional law I'd say no but baseball doesn't operate
     under strict constitutional law. I think what's taking so long is 
     that the owners are trying to find a way to force her out that will
     stand up to a legal challenge.
     
    
3.1558AXIS::ROBICHAUDAHughAndCryForChangeAtFoxboroFri Dec 04 1992 15:505
    	She can't be forced to sell the team, just forced not to manage
    it.  George Steinbluster was still making money as owner of the
    YankMees, he just couldn't have any say as to how the team was run.
    
    				/Don
3.1559Some people should keep the BIG MOUTH SHUTRUNAWY::CBULLS::MBROOKSFri Dec 04 1992 16:5015
    You can not have say, but believe me still have say.  I dont what
    percentage of the team she owns but if she cant help manage the team
    she still may have say in what GM stay or go and so on ???????
    
    Someone told me she was german and Really is Very Prejudice against
    ALL Minorities (Not picky).  Just curious to what laws there are
    against her (or rules in baseball).  Also can Hitlers Teachings in
    anyway fall under Religion ?????  Sometimes they seem like Cults ??
    
    						I hate to be on that team
    						If I was (jewish or Black)
    
    Also I wonder if any of the minorities could now breech there contracts
    and refuse to play for that team as long as she is the owner,  more or
    less becoming free agents ?????
3.1560PFSVAX::JACOBCar Accidents are a pain in the neckFri Dec 04 1992 18:1110
    
    >>  she won't end up shabbily dressed, pushing a shopping cart filled with 
    >>  her belongings around Cincinnati, drooling all over herself and mumbling
    >>  loudly about how she used to be somebody.
    
    Isn't that what she does now after one of her all night drinking binges
    that allegedly happen????
    
    JaKe
    
3.1561CAMONE::WAYCheez-Whiz, Choice of ChampionsFri Dec 04 1992 21:5223
Hitler's "credo" falls under politics.

He had some pretty bizarre ideas pulled from a mish-mash of
different ideologies.  His greatest talent was as an orator,
as he could "spellbind" people with his speeches.

Because the German people were so demoralized after WWI
he was able to touch their national pride (after all it
was called the National Socialist party), and rouse the
people to his ideas.....


If yo'reUId you are interested, William Shirer's "The Rise
and Fall of the Third Reich" makes for pretty interesting
reading.  I haven't finished it, but even the early parts
prior to 1939 are pretty scary, considering you know what is
going to happen.....


A sad story.....


'Saw
3.1562Giants Buy BondsPATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollMon Dec 07 1992 12:534
    According to the Worcester T&G, the winner of the Barry Bonds
    sweepstakes appears to be the SF Giants.  Even though the sale of the
    Giants won't be formally approved until the winter meetings, the new
    owners are already in action.
3.1563PFSVAX::JACOBPC is not fer MEWed Dec 09 1992 22:1112
    Marge Schott barfed a token apology today.
    
    I gots a ????
    
    They are saying tha Schott may be suspended.  How does a suspension
    affect a team owner???  Does she still get the $$$ from the team whilst
    suspended????Is she just forbidden to run the team business while
    suspended????Does she get daily beatings administered by the league's
    discipline comittee????
    
    JaKe
    
3.1564PATE::MACNEALruck `n' rollThu Dec 10 1992 12:272
    Big free agent signings in the NL.  Maddux went to the Braves. 
    Dodgers signed Worrel.
3.1565QUASER::JACKSONTAThe QB shuffle stinksThu Dec 10 1992 14:123
      28 mil for 5 years on maddux?
    
      i'm envious
3.1566CSOA1::BACHThey pelted us with rocks and garbageThu Dec 10 1992 14:163
    The bum.
    
    Chip_RonSanto_Bach
3.1567ROYALT::ASHEThu Dec 10 1992 15:274
    Yankees offered $34...
    
    Not a bad rotation... Maddux, Glavine, Smoltz, Avery...
    
3.1568PFSVAX::JACOBPC is not fer MEFri Dec 11 1992 03:1818
    Seems Mr October_NOT has changed his mind and will wear his Dad's(and
    mentor in becoming such a mental midget) number 25, instead of Willie
    Mays' #24.  Say snippets of the news conference where he met the SF
    media and announced his change of heart, and he came across as a
    sentimental idiot.  Just the way he described being in left field and
    seeing Mays' #24 on the wall, and imagining he was a kid again(mentally
    he's still 4 yrs old) and being in the outfield with his godfather made
    me run fer the bathroom so's I could puke my guts out.
    
    Wonder how he likes DURACELL 6 volt batteries??  Guess we'll find out
    when he comes to Pgh. nexted year.  Now, where is my 1993 schedule?
    
    (8^)*
    
    JaKe
    
    
    
3.1569CUPMK::DEVLINThe bill is due for the last 12 years...Tue Dec 15 1992 12:3714
San Francisco officials approved a five-year lease concessions agreement with
the Giants in which the city will pay the $3.1 million annual cost to
operate Candlestick Park.  The board of supervisors voted 10-1 in favor of the
agreement, which will charge the Giants $1.00 a year for rent.  Supporters of
the deal said the city will be absorbing money that would have been lost if
the Giants moved to St. Petersburg, FLorida.


AN organizer in Cheyenne, Wyoming says minor league play may come to Wyoming,
cColorado and Nebraska.  A relocation of the Arizona League for Rookies did
not work out due to budget considerations.  No formal plans on the table yet to
form a new league.

JD
3.1570GENRAL::WADEHis hair was perfect...Tue Dec 15 1992 15:066
    
    	There's already *minor league* ball in Colorado (Colo. Sprgs.).
    	I'm fairly certain Omaha (Nebraska) has a minor league team
    	already.....
    
    Claybroon