Conference smurf::buildhelp

1746.0. "would you consider addressing this in the backing trees?" by AOSG::FILTER (Automatic Posting Software - mail to flume::puck) Tue Aug 22 1995 15:51

Date Of Receipt: 	21-AUG-1995 17:07:32.47
From: 	SMURF::QUARRY::mjr "Michael Rickabaugh USG  21-Aug-1995 1706"
To: 	odehelp@DEC:.zko.quarry
CC: 	metsky@DEC:.zko.quarry
Subj: 	would you consider addressing this in the backing trees?

------- Forwarded Message

Return-Path: ptt_ode@decwet.ENET.zk3.dec.com 
Delivery-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 95 16:58:56 -0400
Return-Path: ptt_ode@decwet.ENET.zk3.dec.com
Received: from abelia.zk3.dec.com by quarry.zk3.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/13Feb95-0113PM)
	id AA04899; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 16:58:54 -0400
Received: from schnausser.zk3.dec.com by wasted.zk3.dec.com; (5.65v3.0/1.1.8.2/18Feb95-1123AM)
	id AA25568; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 16:58:52 -0400
Received: by schnausser.zk3.dec.com; id AA21536; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 16:57:49 -0400
Received: from DECWET.DECnet MAIL11D_V3 by rust.zso.dec.com (5.65/DECwest-CLUSTRIX-cjf-30Jun93)
	id AA12155; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:58:47 -0700
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 13:58:44 -0700
Message-Id: <9508212058.AA12155@rust.zso.dec.com>
From: ptt_ode@decwet.ENET.zk3.dec.com (21-Aug-1995 1400 -0700)
To: michael rickabaugh@schnausser.zk3.dec.com
Subject: An update on Case ODE-00459 (DEC)

[This update was sent from ODE_ZSO on 21-AUG-1995 14:00:30.98]
[ODE responsible for next action, Problem is undefined]

Michael,

The line should just look like:

	save_ancestor_info FALSE


Don't add the setenv in front of it.
Rima was just in my office telling me
this.  And that we need to make this
more clearer in the manpage.

When Josh gets back from vacation
next week, I will point out this
{ } problem.  I think that we could just
have the markers be  "** " text " **".

I want to run this through the zk3
reng people first.  Since the idea is
tokens that zk3 reng could use to search
for to gain knowledge on merges.


Till later,
Tina


------- End of Forwarded Message