[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference ulysse::rdb_vms_competition

Title:DEC Rdb against the World
Moderator:HERON::GODFRIND
Created:Fri Jun 12 1987
Last Modified:Thu Feb 23 1995
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:1348
Total number of notes:5438

593.0. "*URGENT* RDB AND INGRES ON VAX-HP INTEGRATION" by KETJE::DIERICK () Mon Mar 12 1990 14:27

A *big* customer is evaluating databases and will make his choice
THIS week. We came in just in time otherwise ORACLE would have got
the account.
The environment is as follows :


		IBM    (DB2 - CICS)
                 |
     -----------------------
   VAX                    HP (mpe)

The customer wants 1 development environment for the HP and the VAXes.
We gave a Rdb presentation and the customer is now willing to evaluate
again IF we find a solution on integrating also the HP environment.
A first idea we had is to propose INGRES on HP, Rdb on VAX and use
ingres tools for development and end user access. 

Some questions we have :


1. Does anybody have experiences or knows customers who use this solution ?

2. Can we access both Rdb and INGRES from the same application using
   INGRES tools (2PC not really needed as much is read only) ?

3. Do we have other alternatives that have proven good ? 

4. Can we access DB2 with INGRES tools using VIDA ?


I am having a meeting with INGRES today, but I don't want to hear
everything from INGRES alone.

As you might guess, we need the info bad and urgent.

Thanks


Dominique

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
593.1Try CognosNOVA::BOOTHWhat am I?...An Oracle?Mon Mar 12 1990 17:346
    My suggestion would be to try to use Cognos (PowerHouse). The majority
    of their installed base is HP. They should have experience dealing with
    this kind of situation. Ingres is virtually non-existent on HP. It has
    no presence in the old HP 3000, 1000 base.
    
    ---- Michael Booth
593.2Yes - PowerhouseMAIL::FARLOWSSoftware Sells HardwareMon Mar 12 1990 18:2616
    I agree with Michael that Cognos is your best bet.  I have a large
    customer that is in the process of converting existing Powerhouse
    applications on HP machines to Powerhouse on the VAX.  The HP and VAX
    versions of Powerhouse are similar.  Things seem to be going well for
    this customer.
    
    I would try to stay away from getting too many conflicting alternatives
    being presented to the customer.  It may be most effective to determine
    the best alternative for the customer and then show how the alternative
    meets their needs best, rather than taking a shotgun approach with a
    large number of vendors and then hoping the customer can figure out how
    things fit together.
    
    Good Luck,
    
    Steve Farlow @STO
593.3PowerhouseKETJE::DIERICKAre you Motifated today ?Mon Mar 12 1990 20:3311
Sorry,

Powerhouse is not on the short list : only INGRES - ORACLE are remaining...

I just talked to the INGRES guys, they ported INGRES to the HP platform
about 4 months ago, so indeed there is no installed base.
There is not yet support for INGRES Star however for HP MPE.


Dominique
593.4DPDMAI::DAVISGBEscapee from New Hampshire...Tue Mar 13 1990 01:135
    Point out cost of ownership...at least on the VAX side they may be able
    to save some $$$....
    
    Oracle will drag then under with License charges...
    
593.5INGRES ORACLE ...buyer bewareTRCO01::MCMULLENThu Mar 15 1990 17:1817
    Don't use Ingres with Rdb....the performance is poor, Ingres support
    is terrible. Check my note further back in the mid 500s. There are
    all sorts of problems with the Ingres tool set. No one ever tested
    them from Ingres or Digital.
    
    Also Ingres tools do not support Rdb/VMS V3.1A. Ingres promised
    to have it fixed in two days almost a month ago. Now they don't
    even return phone calls.
    
    Cognos is a better solution for this environment. Any new product
    (especially a 4GL) on a new platform scares the heck out of me.
    
    
    BUYER BEWARE!
    
    
    Ken McMullen
593.6Poor is RightSUBWAY::BOWERSDave Bowers @WHOThu Mar 15 1990 18:2812
    I've been running some informal "benchmarks" on the Ingres/Rdb gateway
    using Rdb static SQL, Rdb dynamic SQL and Ingres dynamic SQL.  The test
    program simply retrieves all rows from a set of identical relations
    containing from 500 to 10000 rows.  

    Rdb dynamic SQL provides 70% or better of the throughput achieved with
    static SQL.  Ingres SQL via the gateway yields bout 20% of the Rdb
    static SQL throughput.

    This wasn't intended to be a competitive benchmark and is far from a
    complete evaluation of the products, but it does give some indication
    of the cost of using the Ingres gateway.