| Title: | You get surface noise in real life too |
| Notice: | Let's be conformist |
| Moderator: | GOVT02::BARKER |
| Created: | Thu Jul 28 1988 |
| Last Modified: | Mon Jun 02 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 550 |
| Total number of notes: | 3847 |
What are the chances that a 9-10 gauge
(approx. 6 milimeters square) semi-'NO NAME'
speaker cable (copper unknown) compare
similarily to a brand-name 13 gauge
(2.5 mm2) cable ?
From the look of it, its hundreds of tiny wires twisted
together in some 7 groups, again twisted together.
From the look through the transparent coating,
the tag-claim 'OFC' seems probable.
Company name is TECHNOCABEL (very young, polish origin).
Our local pricing: 1.3$ per meter (seems tempting!).
Zygmunt.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 513.1 | Budget bi-wiring ? | SAWA::JERZYNSKI | Zygmunt JERZYNSKI | Fri Feb 24 1995 12:19 | 13 |
Additional comment:
I am considering setting up Bi-Wiring, and using:
1. Technocabel-thing for the kicking Bass (assumption: Bass needs
low ohms, and nothing realy more), whereas
2. Use something more brand-like/higher gauge for the mid-treble,
to avoid rolloff and achieve reasonable soundstage imaging
(thats what you Guy's call it ?)
Thanks for input,
Z.
| |||||