[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference hips::uk_audioo

Title:You get surface noise in real life too
Notice:Let's be conformist
Moderator:GOVT02::BARKER
Created:Thu Jul 28 1988
Last Modified:Mon Jun 02 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:550
Total number of notes:3847

173.0. "Bi-amping characteristics" by WOTVAX::MEAKINS (Clive Meakins) Tue May 15 1990 21:00

This note is also posted in DSSDEV::AUDIO.
    
    I recently built a bipolar power amp with a high quality pot for a
    volume control.  I use this amp with CD input only in my "background
    music" system.
    
    My main system has a Musical Fidelity A1 amp at the centre of it, not
    super-fi, but it sounds good to me.  The A1 is smooth sounding and
    involving, but bass performance is not it's strong point (though it's
    ok).
    
    The amp I built is different to the A1, a little clinical
    sounding, but deep and firm bass.  My question is - it wouldn't cost me
    too much to build a second pair of amps, this would enable me to go to
    bi-amping.  What sort of differences might I notice by doing this?  I
    have to say that I don't need to do this, but I'm interested and may
    try it for fun. 
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
173.1Remember G.I.G.O.BAHTAT::SALLITTDave @RKG, 831-3117Wed May 16 1990 18:5419
    I assume by bi-amping you mean driving the seperate parts of your
    speakers' passive crossovers with seperate power amps, as opposed to
    using an active electronic crossover before the power amps, and no
    passive crossovers at all. I'd term the latter "active", although that
    usually implies the power amps live in the speaker cabs. However.
    
    I would expect to hear more control, especially at low frequencies, and
    greater seperation between details in the music throughout the band, by 
    bi-amping. This can be had to a lesser degree with bi-wiring, and to a 
    much greater degree in an active system. Whether this this will actually 
    sound *better* will depend on many other factors in the system, and may
    ruthlessly expose any inadequacies in the source signal.
    
    You may get a more learned discourse on this in DSSDEV::AUDIO, where I
    see you've also posted this note.
    
    Have fun.
    
    Dave