[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

3517.0. "Think this might help Digital??" by --UnknownUser-- () Wed Nov 16 1994 10:50

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3517.1Forward to Enrico!MSGAXP::MCCULLERWed Nov 16 1994 11:2813
    
    I strongly support this approach. Although it is not necessarily
    "leadership innovation", the logic presented is very hard to dispute.
    At a minimum, the CMOS default should be the hard drive for bootup,
    where the greatest chance of virus infection is resident. The base
    note should be forwarded by the author to Enrico. I suspect he will
    find the message presented clear and initiate the action to have his
    people examine this approach.
    
    Good thinking from our PC SECURITY notesfile moderator.
    
    Mac (who worries about virus infection daily)
    
3517.2KAOFS::B_VANVALKENBWed Nov 16 1994 11:3212
    Sounds good but would it be more robust if there was a virus
    checker in PROM that could be activated by hardware on startup ???
    
    That way the difference would appear invisible to the end user but
    the added value could still be there.
    
    
    PROM update could be made available yearly at a small charge. : )
    
    
    Brian V
    
3517.3QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centWed Nov 16 1994 11:4210
Our Celebris line can already do this.  

      *  Boot-device sequence selections:
         A: drive followed by C: drive
         C: drive followed by A: drive
         C: Drive only

Or are you saying that our systems should ship with "C only" the default?

				Steve
3517.4How 'bout some more flash?FPTVX1::CUSHMANBob CushmanWed Nov 16 1994 12:395
    .0, .3 are a good start, but I second .2 also.  Having an "embedded"
    virus scan in startup firmware has some definite advantages. Instead
    of a new prom however, you might want to consider having the virus
    signatures on flash allowing for easy updates whenever a new signature
    file becomes available.
3517.5PASTIS::MONAHANhumanity is a trojan horseWed Nov 16 1994 13:5812
    	I would defer to Phil on this point, but i believe virus scanners
    
    1) tend to be large
    2) need updating more than once per year
    3) sometimes give false positives
    4) are usually proprietary
    
    	All of these would indicate that putting them in PROM on a machine
    might be undesirable.
    
    	I don't  use PCs much, but the suggestion in the base note sounds
    good to me.
3517.6Simple requestMINOTR::BANCROFTWed Nov 16 1994 14:2523
>>	I would defer to Phil on this point, but i believe virus scanners
  (I know Dave Monahan, and he need not defer to anybody ) 
    Dave is quite right:
    1) tend to be large and the TSR "VIRSTOP" uses memory (I at least) am
       short on.
    2) need updating more than once per year - in fact about 6 times a
       year.
    3) sometimes give false positives - right
    4) are usually proprietary - would need whole new licensing for US to
       ship machines OR would need us to UPSIZE to set up an anti-virus
       lab,  and you can imagine that is not likely.
    
    REALLY all I now think is needed is the CMOS to be set to boot C:
    first then A: as the default, with an option - like control A held
    down during bootup to boot off A: first.
    
    
    
    	All of these would indicate that putting them in PROM on a machine
    might be undesirable.
    
    	I don't  use PCs much, but the suggestion in the base note sounds
    good to me.
3517.7QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centWed Nov 16 1994 14:314
I read in the IBMPC-94 file that the boot sector on Celebris PCs can be
write-protected, which is a great idea (I'll be sure to do this on mine).

				Steve
3517.8how do you spell PROPRIETARY?OFOS02::GINGERRon GingerWed Nov 16 1994 19:1812
    This is exacty the kind of thinking that got us the Rainbow, then all
    the tandy-DEC pcs.
    
    This is a COMPATIBLE world. customers dont want vendor specific 'fixes'
    that dont work like a 'real' machine.
    
    Think about all the PC support folks around the world - the outside
    world, not at DEC- that would be confused by a PC that didnt 'work
    right' when you booted it.
    
    We are finally getting to where we build a PC that is INDUSTRY
    COMPATIBLE. Lets dont go backward now.
3517.9Please explainCSC32::MORTONAliens, the snack food of CHAMPIONS!Wed Nov 16 1994 19:328
    Re .8
    
    Ron,
    	I can't see where the proposals are non-compatable with the
    industry standard, but are an enhancement.  Please explain your
    concerns, I'd really like to understand...
    
    Jim Morton
3517.10BIOS's already do this!BBPPDR::ROWELLPaul Rowell @BBP - TMC UKWed Nov 16 1994 19:3410
     A colleague recently bought an industry standard motherboard to build
    his own PC. The interesting thing was that as part of the BIOS you
    could intercept any call to change the boot sector on the hard disk and
    have a warning saying "Something is writing to the boot sector on your
    hard disk do you want to proceed?"
    
    I like the idea of being able to overide C: only boot by pressing a
    key.
    
    -Paul
3517.11BHAJEE::JAERVINENOra, the Old Rural AmateurThu Nov 17 1994 07:229
    re .10: This feature is even in my (almost) noname motherboard in my
    home PC...
    
    In fact, most modern BIOSes have the ability to define the boot
    sequence (the classical A: first, then C:, or vice versa, or C: only).
    If I read .0 correctly, the main suggestion is to enable booting A:
    using a special key combination at startup. This would obviously be a
    bit more comfortable than going to setup - but if booting from A: is
    regarded the excetption anyway, what's the big deal?
3517.12PLAYER::BROWNLThe InfoHighway has too many side-roads.Thu Nov 17 1994 07:4116
    Additionally, the proposal in .0 is to stop virii. It won't. Given
    that, as previously explained, the facility to keep A: out of the loop
    is there on most machines anyway, the only thing this proposal does is
    to enforce that as a default. Hmmm.
    
    Most PCs are infected through an infected floppy in A: or perhaps B:.
    Not booting from a floppy will only prevent a very small number of
    infections by virii that infect the host on boot. Irrespective of when
    or from where the PC was booted, it's just as infected if an infected
    floppy is inserted to the floppy drive and referenced. Besides, how
    does making it the default stop users from over-riding it? 
    
    No, I don't see the point in this. I'd rather see users given a free
    licence to McAfee or some similar anti-virus software.
    
    Cheers, Laurie.
3517.13BOXORN::HAYSI think we are toast. Remember the jam?Thu Nov 17 1994 11:487
RE: 3517.12 by PLAYER::BROWNL "The InfoHighway has too many side-roads."

Or give users a real OS,  like WindowsNT or VMS or UNIX,  that has a file 
system with protections and such what.


Phil
3517.14More PhilMINOTR::BANCROFTThu Nov 17 1994 12:1643
>>    Most PCs are infected through an infected floppy in A: or perhaps B:.
    Yup, the only other normal vector is the net, and 90% of what I see as
    current Digital infections are simple boot sector type.  
    NOTE: there ARE multipartate viruses which have both boot and file
    (parasitic) forms.  I have never seen one at Digital.  Most viruses I
    see are the FORM virus, with very few others, mostly Boot Sector.
    
>> Irrespective of when
>>    or from where the PC was booted, it's just as infected if an infected
>>    floppy is inserted to the floppy drive and referenced.
    Viruses attempt to infect when their code is executed, they are just
    computer programs.  Boot sector sector viruses come in from diskettes
    when the diskette is (intentionally or unintentionally) booted.  File
    (also called parasitic) viruses infect when the host program is run.
    Companion viruses are too uncommon to discuss.  Multipartate viruses
    can infect when either the infected boot sector or file is run.
    
    The FORM, boot sector virus is the main virus I see at Digital.
    
    >>  Besides, how does making it the default stop users from over-riding it? 
    It does not.  When was the last time you needed to boot from the A:
    drive?  I see a fair proportion of the Digital virus infections, and
    every one of the boot sector ones which we have clearly traced came in 
    from UNINTENTIONAL booting of the infected diskette.  Remember most of 
    Digital infections are boot sector.
    
    A simple boot sector virus infected diskette will NEVER - NIE MALS - JAMAIS 
    - NUNCA infect your system unless you boot it!
    
    >> No, I don't see the point in this. I'd rather see users given a free
    >> licence to McAfee or some similar anti-virus software.
I currently supply the latest F-PROTECT from  MINOTR::USER6:[VIRUS].
    
    In MINOTR::USER6:[SECURITY]
      FAQ.VIRUSL is an outstanding list of answers to frequently asked
                 virus questions
      ANTI-VIRUS-HANDBOOK.PS is a postscript two part book on anti-virus
                 information.
    They are available for copy over the net.
    
    NOTE: All I want to do is decrease Digital virus infections.  The stuff
          about "marketing advantages" is to try to interest management 
          as they control the real power ($) to get things done.