[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

3231.0. "The Demise of DEC - by Greg Scott" by HAAG::HAAG (Machine42. One last time.) Tue Jul 05 1994 16:48

    .1 contains a paper written by a former employee whom many know - greg
    scott. he has sent the paper to the VMS partners and to each member of
    DECs board of directors. he has asked me to post it here as well. i
    don't believe the posting violates any conference or DEC policy as I
    understand them. the rest of this note and .1 contain the complete
    version of what greg sent to me.
    
    if anyone wants to read .1 and doesn't know how to get it printed they
    can send me mail or ask someone near by. 
    
From:	KANGA::"DGSCOTT@STTHOMAS.EDU" "Greg Scott at the University of St. 
        Thomas in Minnesota"  5-JUL-1994 00:47:11.38
To:	haag::haag
CC:	
Subj:	Please post this in the DIGITAL notesfile.....- Greg Scott

Gene - 

Please post the attached paper in the DIGITAL notesfile and any other
electronic forum you see fit.

As you know, I was a 12+ year DEC employee until I was laid off in 
January, 1994.  I can't complain about my personal situation and I have
nothing but good to say about my immediate supervisors during my last 
year at DEC.  We resolved a difficult situation in the best manner we 
could. 

However, I can no longer sit by and watch Digital's current senior
management flush what used to be a good company down the toilet.  I feel
an obligation to do what I can to help many of my friends who are left
behind.  I also have a selfish motive -- my startup consulting practice
depends on a healthy and thriving greater DEC community.  If DEC goes
down, my new business goes down.

I wrote this paper for my "Management of the Firm in Trouble" MBA class 
at the University of St. Thomas here in the Twin Cities.  It describes 
the sitation at DEC as I see it - from the point of view of a long time 
insider - and offers recommendations on how to move forward from here.

I believe the suggestions I offer have some value and I offer them in the
hope they can do some good.  The opinions in the paper are mine; any errors
of fact or omission are also mine.

I hereby give my permission to forward the attached paper widely, provided
it stays intact and includes my name and electronic mail address.

The attached postscript document is roughly 650 blocks and about 45 printed 
pages.


- Greg Scott
Scott Consulting
Internet: dgscott@stthomas.edu  or  72102.136@CompuServe.com

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3231.1Postscript version of paperHAAG::HAAGMachine42. One last time.Tue Jul 05 1994 16:499517
%!PS-Adobe-3.0
%%Creator: Windows PSCRIPT
%%Title: Microsoft Word - DEMISE.DOC
%%BoundingBox: 6 6 606 786
%%DocumentNeededResources: (atend)
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: (atend)
%%Pages: (atend)
%%BeginResource: procset Win35Dict 3 1
/Win35Dict 290 dict def Win35Dict begin/bd{bind def}bind def/in{72
mul}bd/ed{exch def}bd/ld{load def}bd/tr/translate ld/gs/gsave ld/gr
/grestore ld/M/moveto ld/L/lineto ld/rmt/rmoveto ld/rlt/rlineto ld
/rct/rcurveto ld/st/stroke ld/n/newpath ld/sm/setmatrix ld/cm/currentmatrix
ld/cp/closepath ld/ARC/arcn ld/TR{65536 div}bd/lj/setlinejoin ld/lc
/setlinecap ld/ml/setmiterlimit ld/sl/setlinewidth ld/scignore false
def/sc{scignore{pop pop pop}{0 index 2 index eq 2 index 4 index eq
and{pop pop 255 div setgray}{3{255 div 3 1 roll}repeat setrgbcolor}ifelse}ifelse}bd
/FC{bR bG bB sc}bd/fC{/bB ed/bG ed/bR ed}bd/HC{hR hG hB sc}bd/hC{
/hB ed/hG ed/hR ed}bd/PC{pR pG pB sc}bd/pC{/pB ed/pG ed/pR ed}bd/sM
matrix def/PenW 1 def/iPen 5 def/mxF matrix def/mxE matrix def/mxUE
matrix def/mxUF matrix def/fBE false def/iDevRes 72 0 matrix defaultmatrix
dtransform dup mul exch dup mul add sqrt def/fPP false def/SS{fPP{
/SV save def}{gs}ifelse}bd/RS{fPP{SV restore}{gr}ifelse}bd/EJ{gsave
showpage grestore}bd/#C{userdict begin/#copies ed end}bd/FEbuf 2 string
def/FEglyph(G  )def/FE{1 exch{dup 16 FEbuf cvrs FEglyph exch 1 exch
putinterval 1 index exch FEglyph cvn put}for}bd/SM{/iRes ed/cyP ed
/cxPg ed/cyM ed/cxM ed 72 100 div dup scale dup 0 ne{90 eq{cyM exch
0 eq{cxM exch tr -90 rotate -1 1 scale}{cxM cxPg add exch tr +90 rotate}ifelse}{cyP
cyM sub exch 0 ne{cxM exch tr -90 rotate}{cxM cxPg add exch tr -90
rotate 1 -1 scale}ifelse}ifelse}{pop cyP cyM sub exch 0 ne{cxM cxPg
add exch tr 180 rotate}{cxM exch tr 1 -1 scale}ifelse}ifelse 100 iRes
div dup scale 0 0 transform .25 add round .25 sub exch .25 add round
.25 sub exch itransform translate}bd/SJ{1 index 0 eq{pop pop/fBE false
def}{1 index/Break ed div/dxBreak ed/fBE true def}ifelse}bd/ANSIVec[
16#0/grave 16#1/acute 16#2/circumflex 16#3/tilde 16#4/macron 16#5/breve
16#6/dotaccent 16#7/dieresis 16#8/ring 16#9/cedilla 16#A/hungarumlaut
16#B/ogonek 16#C/caron 16#D/dotlessi 16#27/quotesingle 16#60/grave
16#7C/bar 16#82/quotesinglbase 16#83/florin 16#84/quotedblbase 16#85
/ellipsis 16#86/dagger 16#87/daggerdbl 16#88/circumflex 16#89/perthousand
16#8A/Scaron 16#8B/guilsinglleft 16#8C/OE 16#91/quoteleft 16#92/quoteright
16#93/quotedblleft 16#94/quotedblright 16#95/bullet 16#96/endash 16#97
/emdash 16#98/tilde 16#99/trademark 16#9A/scaron 16#9B/guilsinglright
16#9C/oe 16#9F/Ydieresis 16#A0/space 16#A1/exclamdown 16#A4/currency
16#A5/yen 16#A6/brokenbar 16#A7/section 16#A8/dieresis 16#A9/copyright
16#AA/ordfeminine 16#AB/guillemotleft 16#AC/logicalnot 16#AD/hyphen
16#AE/registered 16#AF/macron 16#B0/degree 16#B1/plusminus 16#B2/twosuperior
16#B3/threesuperior 16#B4/acute 16#B5/mu 16#B6/paragraph 16#B7/periodcentered
16#B8/cedilla 16#B9/onesuperior 16#BA/ordmasculine 16#BB/guillemotright
16#BC/onequarter 16#BD/onehalf 16#BE/threequarters 16#BF/questiondown
16#C0/Agrave 16#C1/Aacute 16#C2/Acircumflex 16#C3/Atilde 16#C4/Adieresis
16#C5/Aring 16#C6/AE 16#C7/Ccedilla 16#C8/Egrave 16#C9/Eacute 16#CA
/Ecircumflex 16#CB/Edieresis 16#CC/Igrave 16#CD/Iacute 16#CE/Icircumflex
16#CF/Idieresis 16#D0/Eth 16#D1/Ntilde 16#D2/Ograve 16#D3/Oacute 16#D4
/Ocircumflex 16#D5/Otilde 16#D6/Odieresis 16#D7/multiply 16#D8/Oslash
16#D9/Ugrave 16#DA/Uacute 16#DB/Ucircumflex 16#DC/Udieresis 16#DD/Yacute
16#DE/Thorn 16#DF/germandbls 16#E0/agrave 16#E1/aacute 16#E2/acircumflex
16#E3/atilde 16#E4/adieresis 16#E5/aring 16#E6/ae 16#E7/ccedilla 16#E8
/egrave 16#E9/eacute 16#EA/ecircumflex 16#EB/edieresis 16#EC/igrave
16#ED/iacute 16#EE/icircumflex 16#EF/idieresis 16#F0/eth 16#F1/ntilde
16#F2/ograve 16#F3/oacute 16#F4/ocircumflex 16#F5/otilde 16#F6/odieresis
16#F7/divide 16#F8/oslash 16#F9/ugrave 16#FA/uacute 16#FB/ucircumflex
16#FC/udieresis 16#FD/yacute 16#FE/thorn 16#FF/ydieresis ] def/reencdict
12 dict def/IsChar{basefontdict/CharStrings get exch known}bd/MapCh{dup
IsChar not{pop/bullet}if newfont/Encoding get 3 1 roll put}bd/MapDegree{16#b0
/degree IsChar{/degree}{/ring}ifelse MapCh}bd/MapBB{16#a6/brokenbar
IsChar{/brokenbar}{/bar}ifelse MapCh}bd/ANSIFont{reencdict begin/newfontname
ed/basefontname ed FontDirectory newfontname known not{/basefontdict
basefontname findfont def/newfont basefontdict maxlength dict def basefontdict{exch
dup/FID ne{dup/Encoding eq{exch dup length array copy newfont 3 1 roll
put}{exch newfont 3 1 roll put}ifelse}{pop pop}ifelse}forall newfont
/FontName newfontname put 127 1 159{newfont/Encoding get exch/bullet
put}for ANSIVec aload pop ANSIVec length 2 idiv{MapCh}repeat MapDegree
MapBB newfontname newfont definefont pop}if newfontname end}bd/SB{FC
/ULlen ed/str ed str length fBE not{dup 1 gt{1 sub}if}if/cbStr ed
/dxGdi ed/y0 ed/x0 ed str stringwidth dup 0 ne{/y1 ed/x1 ed y1 y1
mul x1 x1 mul add sqrt dxGdi exch div 1 sub dup x1 mul cbStr div exch
y1 mul cbStr div}{exch abs neg dxGdi add cbStr div exch}ifelse/dyExtra
ed/dxExtra ed x0 y0 M fBE{dxBreak 0 BCh dxExtra dyExtra str awidthshow}{dxExtra
dyExtra str ashow}ifelse fUL{x0 y0 M dxUL dyUL rmt ULlen fBE{Break
add}if 0 mxUE transform gs rlt cyUL sl [] 0 setdash st gr}if fSO{x0
y0 M dxSO dySO rmt ULlen fBE{Break add}if 0 mxUE transform gs rlt cyUL
sl [] 0 setdash st gr}if n/fBE false def}bd/font{/name ed/Ascent ed
0 ne/fT3 ed 0 ne/fSO ed 0 ne/fUL ed/Sy ed/Sx ed 10.0 div/ori ed -10.0
div/esc ed/BCh ed name findfont/xAscent 0 def/yAscent Ascent def/ULesc
esc def ULesc mxUE rotate pop fT3{/esc 0 def xAscent yAscent mxUE transform
/yAscent ed/xAscent ed}if [Sx 0 0 Sy neg xAscent yAscent] esc mxE
rotate mxF concatmatrix makefont setfont [Sx 0 0 Sy neg 0 Ascent] mxUE
mxUF concatmatrix pop fUL{currentfont dup/FontInfo get/UnderlinePosition
known not{pop/Courier findfont}if/FontInfo get/UnderlinePosition get
1000 div 0 exch mxUF transform/dyUL ed/dxUL ed}if fSO{0 .3 mxUF transform
/dySO ed/dxSO ed}if fUL fSO or{currentfont dup/FontInfo get/UnderlineThickness
known not{pop/Courier findfont}if/FontInfo get/UnderlineThickness get
1000 div Sy mul/cyUL ed}if}bd/min{2 copy gt{exch}if pop}bd/max{2 copy
lt{exch}if pop}bd/CP{/ft ed{{ft 0 eq{clip}{eoclip}ifelse}stopped{currentflat
1 add setflat}{exit}ifelse}loop}bd/patfont 10 dict def patfont begin
/FontType 3 def/FontMatrix [1 0 0 -1 0 0] def/FontBBox [0 0 16 16]
def/Encoding StandardEncoding def/BuildChar{pop pop 16 0 0 0 16 16
setcachedevice 16 16 false [1 0 0 1 .25 .25]{pat}imagemask}bd end/p{
/pat 32 string def{}forall 0 1 7{dup 2 mul pat exch 3 index put dup
2 mul 1 add pat exch 3 index put dup 2 mul 16 add pat exch 3 index
put 2 mul 17 add pat exch 2 index put pop}for}bd/pfill{/PatFont patfont
definefont setfont/ch(AAAA)def X0 64 X1{Y1 -16 Y0{1 index exch M ch
show}for pop}for}bd/vert{X0 w X1{dup Y0 M Y1 L st}for}bd/horz{Y0 w
Y1{dup X0 exch M X1 exch L st}for}bd/fdiag{X0 w X1{Y0 M X1 X0 sub dup
rlt st}for Y0 w Y1{X0 exch M Y1 Y0 sub dup rlt st}for}bd/bdiag{X0 w
X1{Y1 M X1 X0 sub dup neg rlt st}for Y0 w Y1{X0 exch M Y1 Y0 sub dup
neg rlt st}for}bd/AU{1 add cvi 15 or}bd/AD{1 sub cvi -16 and}bd/SHR{pathbbox
AU/Y1 ed AU/X1 ed AD/Y0 ed AD/X0 ed}bd/hfill{/w iRes 37.5 div round
def 0.1 sl [] 0 setdash n dup 0 eq{horz}if dup 1 eq{vert}if dup 2 eq{fdiag}if
dup 3 eq{bdiag}if dup 4 eq{horz vert}if 5 eq{fdiag bdiag}if}bd/F{/ft
ed fm 256 and 0 ne{gs FC ft 0 eq{fill}{eofill}ifelse gr}if fm 1536
and 0 ne{SHR gs HC ft CP fm 1024 and 0 ne{/Tmp save def pfill Tmp restore}{fm
15 and hfill}ifelse gr}if}bd/S{PenW sl PC st}bd/m matrix def/GW{iRes
12 div PenW add cvi}bd/DoW{iRes 50 div PenW add cvi}bd/DW{iRes 8 div
PenW add cvi}bd/SP{/PenW ed/iPen ed iPen 0 eq iPen 6 eq or{[] 0 setdash}if
iPen 1 eq{[DW GW] 0 setdash}if iPen 2 eq{[DoW GW] 0 setdash}if iPen
3 eq{[DW GW DoW GW] 0 setdash}if iPen 4 eq{[DW GW DoW GW DoW GW] 0
setdash}if}bd/E{m cm pop tr scale 1 0 moveto 0 0 1 0 360 arc cp m sm}bd
/AG{/sy ed/sx ed sx div 4 1 roll sy div 4 1 roll sx div 4 1 roll sy
div 4 1 roll atan/a2 ed atan/a1 ed sx sy scale a1 a2 ARC}def/A{m cm
pop tr AG m sm}def/P{m cm pop tr 0 0 M AG cp m sm}def/RRect{n 4 copy
M 3 1 roll exch L 4 2 roll L L cp}bd/RRCC{/r ed/y1 ed/x1 ed/y0 ed/x0
ed x0 x1 add 2 div y0 M x1 y0 x1 y1 r arcto 4{pop}repeat x1 y1 x0 y1
r arcto 4{pop}repeat x0 y1 x0 y0 r arcto 4{pop}repeat x0 y0 x1 y0 r
arcto 4{pop}repeat cp}bd/RR{2 copy 0 eq exch 0 eq or{pop pop RRect}{2
copy eq{pop RRCC}{m cm pop/y2 ed/x2 ed/ys y2 x2 div 1 max def/xs x2
y2 div 1 max def/y1 exch ys div def/x1 exch xs div def/y0 exch ys div
def/x0 exch xs div def/r2 x2 y2 min def xs ys scale x0 x1 add 2 div
y0 M x1 y0 x1 y1 r2 arcto 4{pop}repeat x1 y1 x0 y1 r2 arcto 4{pop}repeat
x0 y1 x0 y0 r2 arcto 4{pop}repeat x0 y0 x1 y0 r2 arcto 4{pop}repeat
m sm cp}ifelse}ifelse}bd/PP{{rlt}repeat}bd/OB{gs 0 ne{7 3 roll/y ed
/x ed x y translate ULesc rotate x neg y neg translate x y 7 -3 roll}if
sc B fill gr}bd/B{M/dy ed/dx ed dx 0 rlt 0 dy rlt dx neg 0 rlt cp}bd
/CB{B clip n}bd/ErrHandler{errordict dup maxlength exch length gt
dup{errordict begin}if/errhelpdict 12 dict def errhelpdict begin/stackunderflow(operand stack underflow)def
/undefined(this name is not defined in a dictionary)def/VMerror(you have used up all the printer's memory)def
/typecheck(operator was expecting a different type of operand)def
/ioerror(input/output error occured)def end{end}if errordict begin
/handleerror{$error begin newerror{/newerror false def showpage 72
72 scale/x .25 def/y 9.6 def/Helvetica findfont .2 scalefont setfont
x y moveto(Offending Command = )show/command load{dup type/stringtype
ne{(max err string)cvs}if show}exec/y y .2 sub def x y moveto(Error = )show
errorname{dup type dup( max err string )cvs show( : )show/stringtype
ne{( max err string )cvs}if show}exec errordict begin errhelpdict errorname
known{x 1 add y .2 sub moveto errhelpdict errorname get show}if end
/y y .4 sub def x y moveto(Stack =)show ostack{/y y .2 sub def x 1
add y moveto dup type/stringtype ne{( max err string )cvs}if show}forall
showpage}if end}def end}bd end
%%EndResource
/SVDoc save def
%%EndProlog
%%BeginSetup
Win35Dict begin
ErrHandler
statusdict begin 0 setjobtimeout end
statusdict begin statusdict /jobname (Microsoft Word - DEMISE.DOC) put end
/oldDictCnt countdictstack def {statusdict /setpapertray known {statusdict begin 3 setpapertray end} if
}stopped 
{ countdictstack oldDictCnt lt { Win35Dict begin } 
{1 1 countdictstack oldDictCnt sub {pop end } for } ifelse } if 
/oldDictCnt countdictstack def {}stopped 
{ countdictstack oldDictCnt lt { Win35Dict begin } 
{1 1 countdictstack oldDictCnt sub {pop end } for } ifelse } if 
statusdict /setduplexmode known {statusdict begin false setduplexmode end} if
[{ }
/exec load currenttransfer /exec load] cvx settransfer
%%EndSetup
%%BeginPageSetup
%%EndPageSetup
%%Page: 1 1
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
508 354 1485 (Digital Equipment Corporation:) 1485 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 67 /Helvetica-Oblique /font11 ANSIFont font
1162 504 167 (R.I.P) 157 SB
1319 504 21 (.) 21 SB
1217 640 67 (or) 67 SB
654 776 1193 (Future Lean and Mean Competitor?) 1193 SB
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 92 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1023 1265 456 (Greg Scott) 456 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1109 1414 283 (MBMG708) 283 SB
804 1516 894 (Management of the Firm in Trouble) 894 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1025 1912 452 (Spring Semester, 1994) 452 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 53 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2196 383 (Scott Consulting) 383 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2265 213 (internet:) 213 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 53 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
564 2266 727 ( 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 727 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-Oblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 2 2
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 329 61 (T) 54 SB
405 329 784 (able of Contents) 784 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 496 261 (Introduction) 261 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
624 496 416 (................................) 416 SB
1040 496 416 (................................) 416 SB
1456 496 416 (................................) 416 SB
1872 496 247 (...................) 247 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2126 496 25 (4) 25 SB
351 580 531 (Pre-turnaround Situation) 531 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
884 580 416 (................................) 416 SB
1300 580 416 (................................) 416 SB
1716 580 403 (...............................) 403 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2126 580 25 (5) 25 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
401 639 614 (Brief product history and milestones) 614 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1023 639 352 (................................) 352 SB
1375 639 352 (................................) 352 SB
1727 639 352 (................................) 352 SB
2079 639 44 (....) 44 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 639 21 (6) 21 SB
401 689 338 (Seeds of destruction) 338 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
748 689 352 (................................) 352 SB
1100 689 352 (................................) 352 SB
1452 689 352 (................................) 352 SB
1804 689 319 (.............................) 319 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 689 21 (7) 21 SB
451 739 338 (Abandoned markets) 338 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
792 739 352 (................................) 352 SB
1144 739 352 (................................) 352 SB
1496 739 352 (................................) 352 SB
1848 739 275 (.........................) 275 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 739 21 (7) 21 SB
451 789 337 (Closed Architecture) 337 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
792 789 352 (................................) 352 SB
1144 789 352 (................................) 352 SB
1496 789 352 (................................) 352 SB
1848 789 275 (.........................) 275 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 789 21 (7) 21 SB
451 839 501 (Restrictive Business Practices) 501 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
957 839 352 (................................) 352 SB
1309 839 352 (................................) 352 SB
1661 839 352 (................................) 352 SB
2013 839 110 (..........) 110 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 839 21 (8) 21 SB
451 889 222 (Hiring Binge) 222 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
682 889 352 (................................) 352 SB
1034 889 352 (................................) 352 SB
1386 889 352 (................................) 352 SB
1738 889 352 (................................) 352 SB
2090 889 33 (...) 33 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 889 21 (8) 21 SB
451 939 210 (Competition) 210 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
671 939 352 (................................) 352 SB
1023 939 352 (................................) 352 SB
1375 939 352 (................................) 352 SB
1727 939 352 (................................) 352 SB
2079 939 44 (....) 44 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 939 21 (9) 21 SB
451 989 316 (VAX 9000 Failure) 316 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
770 989 352 (................................) 352 SB
1122 989 352 (................................) 352 SB
1474 989 352 (................................) 352 SB
1826 989 297 (...........................) 297 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 989 21 (9) 21 SB
451 1039 349 (PRISM Cancellation) 349 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
803 1039 352 (................................) 352 SB
1155 1039 352 (................................) 352 SB
1507 1039 352 (................................) 352 SB
1859 1039 264 (........................) 264 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2130 1039 21 (9) 21 SB
451 1089 259 (The stage is set) 259 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
715 1089 352 (................................) 352 SB
1067 1089 352 (................................) 352 SB
1419 1089 352 (................................) 352 SB
1771 1089 330 (..............................) 330 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1089 42 (10) 42 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1164 1221 (Corporate Management and Background of Key Principals) 1221 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1573 1164 416 (................................) 416 SB
1989 1164 104 (........) 104 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 1164 50 (11) 50 SB
351 1248 424 (Description of Crisis) 424 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
780 1248 416 (................................) 416 SB
1196 1248 416 (................................) 416 SB
1612 1248 416 (................................) 416 SB
2028 1248 65 (.....) 65 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 1248 50 (14) 50 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
401 1307 578 (Deteriorating Profit \(Loss\) Picture) 578 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
979 1307 352 (................................) 352 SB
1331 1307 352 (................................) 352 SB
1683 1307 352 (................................) 352 SB
2035 1307 66 (......) 66 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1307 42 (14) 42 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1382 790 (Remedial Steps and their effectiveness) 790 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1144 1382 416 (................................) 416 SB
1560 1382 416 (................................) 416 SB
1976 1382 117 (.........) 117 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 1382 50 (17) 50 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1466 764 (Workstation Wars -- So Far, DEC Lost) 764 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1116 1466 384 (................................) 384 SB
1500 1466 384 (................................) 384 SB
1884 1466 216 (..................) 216 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1466 46 (17) 46 SB
351 1546 651 (Argenti\222s Model Starts to Kick In) 651 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1008 1546 384 (................................) 384 SB
1392 1546 384 (................................) 384 SB
1776 1546 324 (...........................) 324 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1546 46 (19) 46 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
401 1601 194 (Constraints) 194 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
605 1601 352 (................................) 352 SB
957 1601 352 (................................) 352 SB
1309 1601 352 (................................) 352 SB
1661 1601 352 (................................) 352 SB
2013 1601 88 (........) 88 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1601 42 (19) 42 SB
401 1651 1004 (Mismanaged Change, Creative Bookkeeping, Backstabbing) 1004 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1408 1651 352 (................................) 352 SB
1760 1651 341 (...............................) 341 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1651 42 (19) 42 SB
401 1701 456 (Alpha -- \223The Big Project\224) 456 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
858 1701 352 (................................) 352 SB
1210 1701 352 (................................) 352 SB
1562 1701 352 (................................) 352 SB
1914 1701 187 (.................) 187 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1701 42 (20) 42 SB
401 1751 487 (Why isn\222t Alpha Successful?) 487 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
891 1751 352 (................................) 352 SB
1243 1751 352 (................................) 352 SB
1595 1751 352 (................................) 352 SB
1947 1751 154 (..............) 154 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1751 42 (21) 42 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1826 519 (Waves of Reorganizaztions) 519 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
876 1826 384 (................................) 384 SB
1260 1826 384 (................................) 384 SB
1644 1826 384 (................................) 384 SB
2028 1826 72 (......) 72 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1826 46 (21) 46 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
401 1881 760 (Round One -- The New Management System) 760 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1166 1881 352 (................................) 352 SB
1518 1881 352 (................................) 352 SB
1870 1881 231 (.....................) 231 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1881 42 (21) 42 SB
451 1931 181 (Stovepipes) 181 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
638 1931 352 (................................) 352 SB
990 1931 352 (................................) 352 SB
1342 1931 352 (................................) 352 SB
1694 1931 352 (................................) 352 SB
2046 1931 55 (.....) 55 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1931 42 (22) 42 SB
451 1981 436 (Red Lines and Blue Lines) 436 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
891 1981 352 (................................) 352 SB
1243 1981 352 (................................) 352 SB
1595 1981 352 (................................) 352 SB
1947 1981 154 (..............) 154 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1981 42 (22) 42 SB
401 2031 617 (Round 2 -- Customer Business Units) 617 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1023 2031 352 (................................) 352 SB
1375 2031 352 (................................) 352 SB
1727 2031 352 (................................) 352 SB
2079 2031 22 (..) 22 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 2031 42 (24) 42 SB
401 2081 544 (Round 3 -- Back to Geographies) 544 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
946 2081 352 (................................) 352 SB
1298 2081 352 (................................) 352 SB
1650 2081 352 (................................) 352 SB
2002 2081 99 (.........) 99 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 2081 42 (25) 42 SB
401 2131 531 (Round 3 1/2 -- Lucente is Fired) 531 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
935 2131 352 (................................) 352 SB
1287 2131 352 (................................) 352 SB
1639 2131 352 (................................) 352 SB
1991 2131 110 (..........) 110 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 2131 42 (26) 42 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 2206 894 (Apparent Company Operating Conventions) 894 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1248 2206 416 (................................) 416 SB
1664 2206 416 (................................) 416 SB
2080 2206 13 (.) 13 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 2206 50 (27) 50 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2290 206 (Field Sales) 206 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
564 2290 384 (................................) 384 SB
948 2290 384 (................................) 384 SB
1332 2290 384 (................................) 384 SB
1716 2290 384 (................................) 384 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 2290 46 (27) 46 SB
351 2370 349 (Digital Consulting) 349 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
708 2370 384 (................................) 384 SB
1092 2370 384 (................................) 384 SB
1476 2370 384 (................................) 384 SB
1860 2370 240 (....................) 240 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 2370 46 (27) 46 SB
351 2450 342 (Customer Service) 342 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
696 2450 384 (................................) 384 SB
1080 2450 384 (................................) 384 SB
1464 2450 384 (................................) 384 SB
1848 2450 252 (.....................) 252 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 2450 46 (27) 46 SB
351 2530 149 (Storage) 149 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
504 2530 384 (................................) 384 SB
888 2530 384 (................................) 384 SB
1272 2530 384 (................................) 384 SB
1656 2530 384 (................................) 384 SB
2040 2530 60 (.....) 60 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 2530 46 (28) 46 SB
351 2610 78 (PCs) 78 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
432 2610 384 (................................) 384 SB
816 2610 384 (................................) 384 SB
1200 2610 384 (................................) 384 SB
1584 2610 384 (................................) 384 SB
1968 2610 132 (...........) 132 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 2610 46 (28) 46 SB
351 2690 975 (Hardware System Engineering and Manufacturing) 975 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1332 2690 384 (................................) 384 SB
1716 2690 384 (................................) 384 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 2690 46 (29) 46 SB
351 2770 418 (Software Engineering) 418 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
780 2770 384 (................................) 384 SB
1164 2770 384 (................................) 384 SB
1548 2770 384 (................................) 384 SB
1932 2770 168 (..............) 168 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 2770 46 (30) 46 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 2850 837 (Analysis of the Company's Cost Position) 837 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1196 2850 416 (................................) 416 SB
1612 2850 416 (................................) 416 SB
2028 2850 65 (.....) 65 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 2850 50 (33) 50 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 3 3
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 25 59 2126 3067 CB
2126 3069 25 (3) 25 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 278 872 (Analysis of the Company's Differentiation) 872 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1235 278 416 (................................) 416 SB
1651 278 416 (................................) 416 SB
2067 278 26 (..) 26 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 278 50 (34) 50 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 362 201 (Clustering) 201 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
552 362 384 (................................) 384 SB
936 362 384 (................................) 384 SB
1320 362 384 (................................) 384 SB
1704 362 384 (................................) 384 SB
2088 362 12 (.) 12 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 362 46 (34) 46 SB
351 442 116 (Alpha) 116 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
468 442 384 (................................) 384 SB
852 442 384 (................................) 384 SB
1236 442 384 (................................) 384 SB
1620 442 384 (................................) 384 SB
2004 442 96 (........) 96 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 442 46 (34) 46 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 522 1169 (Analysis of the Company's Leadership and Organization) 1169 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1521 522 416 (................................) 416 SB
1937 522 156 (............) 156 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 522 50 (36) 50 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 606 403 (Lack of any Strategy) 403 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
756 606 384 (................................) 384 SB
1140 606 384 (................................) 384 SB
1524 606 384 (................................) 384 SB
1908 606 192 (................) 192 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 606 46 (36) 46 SB
351 686 981 (Illusory Leadership - Why is Management Hiding?) 981 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1332 686 384 (................................) 384 SB
1716 686 384 (................................) 384 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 686 46 (36) 46 SB
351 766 177 (Fair Play) 177 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
528 766 384 (................................) 384 SB
912 766 384 (................................) 384 SB
1296 766 384 (................................) 384 SB
1680 766 384 (................................) 384 SB
2064 766 36 (...) 36 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 766 46 (37) 46 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 846 1104 (Appraisal of the Company's Handling of its Situation) 1104 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1456 846 416 (................................) 416 SB
1872 846 221 (.................) 221 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 846 50 (39) 50 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 930 799 (Lack of Strategy and Conflicts of Interest) 799 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1152 930 384 (................................) 384 SB
1536 930 384 (................................) 384 SB
1920 930 180 (...............) 180 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 930 46 (39) 46 SB
351 1010 509 (Too Many Vice Presidents) 509 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
864 1010 384 (................................) 384 SB
1248 1010 384 (................................) 384 SB
1632 1010 384 (................................) 384 SB
2016 1010 84 (.......) 84 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1010 46 (40) 46 SB
351 1090 400 (What to do about it?) 400 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
756 1090 384 (................................) 384 SB
1140 1090 384 (................................) 384 SB
1524 1090 384 (................................) 384 SB
1908 1090 192 (................) 192 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1090 46 (40) 46 SB
351 1170 504 (Some Specific Suggestions) 504 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
864 1170 384 (................................) 384 SB
1248 1170 384 (................................) 384 SB
1632 1170 384 (................................) 384 SB
2016 1170 84 (.......) 84 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1170 46 (41) 46 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1250 1121 (Appendix - Financial Performance over Several Years) 1121 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
1482 1250 416 (................................) 416 SB
1898 1250 195 (...............) 195 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
2101 1250 50 (43) 50 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1334 1057 (Operating Summary -- Fiscal 1982 through Fiscal 1993) 1057 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1416 1334 384 (................................) 384 SB
1800 1334 300 (.........................) 300 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1334 46 (43) 46 SB
351 1414 1218 (Financial Position Summaries, General Information, and Ratios) 1218 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1572 1414 384 (................................) 384 SB
1956 1414 144 (............) 144 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1414 46 (44) 46 SB
351 1494 714 (Graphs of various expense categories) 714 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1068 1494 384 (................................) 384 SB
1452 1494 384 (................................) 384 SB
1836 1494 264 (......................) 264 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1494 46 (45) 46 SB
351 1574 899 (Operating Results-- Fiscal 1994 Third Quarter) 899 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1260 1574 384 (................................) 384 SB
1644 1574 384 (................................) 384 SB
2028 1574 72 (......) 72 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1574 46 (47) 46 SB
351 1654 935 (Operating Results, First 9 Months of Fiscal 1994) 935 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1296 1654 384 (................................) 384 SB
1680 1654 384 (................................) 384 SB
2064 1654 36 (...) 36 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1654 46 (48) 46 SB
351 1734 1077 (Financial Summary -- End of Third Quarter Fiscal 1994) 1077 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1428 1734 384 (................................) 384 SB
1812 1734 288 (........................) 288 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1734 46 (49) 46 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
401 1789 494 (Selected Balance Sheet Items) 494 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
902 1789 352 (................................) 352 SB
1254 1789 352 (................................) 352 SB
1606 1789 352 (................................) 352 SB
1958 1789 143 (.............) 143 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1789 42 (49) 42 SB
401 1839 594 (Cash Flow and Other Selected data) 594 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1001 1839 352 (................................) 352 SB
1353 1839 352 (................................) 352 SB
1705 1839 352 (................................) 352 SB
2057 1839 44 (....) 44 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2109 1839 42 (50) 42 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1914 877 (Operating Results - Q1 and Q2 of Fiscal 1994) 877 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1236 1914 384 (................................) 384 SB
1620 1914 384 (................................) 384 SB
2004 1914 96 (........) 96 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1914 46 (51) 46 SB
351 1994 894 (Operating Results - First 6 months Fiscal 1994) 894 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
1248 1994 384 (................................) 384 SB
1632 1994 384 (................................) 384 SB
2016 1994 84 (.......) 84 SB
32 0 0 46 46 0 0 0 43 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
2105 1994 46 (52) 46 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 4 4
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 25 59 2126 3067 CB
2126 3069 25 (4) 25 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 329 583 (Introduction) 583 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 471 1723 (Until recently, Digital Equipment Corporation \(DEC\) was the second largest computer) 1723 SB
351 530 1674 (vendor in the world, behind IBM.  DEC offered a unique new way to do computing:) 1674 SB
351 589 1661 (Instead of massive, multi-million dollar mainframes behind a glass wall, why not put) 1661 SB
351 648 1732 (computing power in front of people where they could use it?  Ken Olsen and this vision) 1732 SB
351 707 1269 (led DEC to an unprecedented 30+ years of phenomenal growth.) 1269 SB
351 799 1686 (For an order of magnitude less than the cost of a typical mainframe, DEC could offer) 1686 SB
351 858 1734 (minicomputers and networks to match or exceed nearly all the mainframe\222s capabilities.) 1734 SB
351 917 1678 (DEC pioneered commercial computer networks, distributed processing, client/server) 1678 SB
351 976 1718 (applications, clustering technology, highly available systems, and a whole host of other) 1718 SB
351 1035 716 (information technology innovations.) 716 SB
351 1127 1787 (By 1987, DEC could do no wrong.  Yet, by mid 1994, DEC\222s very survival as an ongoing) 1787 SB
351 1186 1759 (company is questionable.  What happened?  Why did it happen?  Can DEC stop its death) 1759 SB
351 1245 435 (spiral and, if so, how?) 435 SB
351 1337 1744 (As a long time software consultant and DEC employee from 1981 through early 1994, I) 1744 SB
351 1396 1752 (am shocked and saddened by DEC\222s deteriorating situation in mid 1994.  It did not have) 1752 SB
351 1455 290 (to be this way.) 290 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 5 5
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 25 59 2126 3067 CB
2126 3069 25 (5) 25 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1184 (Pre-turnaround Situation) 1184 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 421 1178 (September, 1987, DECworld, Boston World Trade Center:) 1178 SB
351 513 1729 (Boston\222s World Trade Center is an ideal location for a major industry exhibit.  Situated) 1729 SB
351 572 1745 (just across Boston Harbor from Logan Airport, visitors can fly to Logan, take the water) 1745 SB
351 631 1777 (shuttle from the airport to the trade center and the exhibit, and fly out that night.  Visiting) 1777 SB
351 690 1781 (executives can also stay in one of several nearby hotels for extended visits and enjoy all of) 1781 SB
351 749 1488 (Boston\222s amenities.  Rifkin and Harrar described the 1987 DECworld best:) 1488 SB
426 841 1710 (They called it DECworld, a single company exposition designed to show off the might) 1710 SB
426 900 1721 (of the second most powerful company in the computer world.  True to its name, it was) 1721 SB
426 959 1630 (a world unto itself.  Boats, planes, helicopters, buses, and limousines criss-crossed) 1630 SB
426 1018 1700 (Boston, bringing 50,000 people to the World Trade Center to see DEC\222s product line) 1700 SB
426 1077 509 (and hear DEC\222s message.) 509 SB
426 1169 1673 (The QEII and the Oceanic, the world\222s two largest cruise ships, sat docked amid the) 1673 SB
426 1228 1605 ($1 million pilings DEC had hastily built to accommodate them.  The ships were a) 1605 SB
426 1287 1655 (glitzy, yet practical, solution to the lack of hotel rooms.  Boston had never hosted a) 1655 SB
426 1346 361 (conference so big.) 361 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
787 1340 16 (1) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1438 1673 (With the benefit of hindsight, that 1987 DECworld event marked the peak of DEC\222s) 1673 SB
351 1497 1738 (success.  For a brief period, DEC ruled the computing community.  Analysts at the time) 1738 SB
351 1556 1738 (stumbled all over themselves  predicting a rosy future ahead; some predicted 20 percent) 1738 SB
351 1615 1667 (compounded growth for the next 5 years.  Jack Shields, then head of DEC sales and) 1667 SB
351 1674 1679 (service, printed up party invitations for  July 10, 2007, the predicted date when DEC) 1679 SB
351 1733 579 (would pass IBM in revenues.) 579 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
930 1727 16 (2) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1825 1716 (Those were heady times.  We offered products no other vendors could build, we knew) 1716 SB
351 1884 1647 (more about software development and project management than anyone.  We were) 1647 SB
351 1943 1754 (\223right\224, everyone else was \223wrong\224.  We were smarter, more healthy, and better looking) 1754 SB
351 2002 1706 (than anyone else, and we were not shy about telling everyone within earshot.  In other) 1706 SB
351 2061 1009 (words, we became too arrogant for our own good.) 1009 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1360 2055 16 (3) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2153 1634 (Starting in the early 80\222s, an underground memo began circulating on how to treat) 1634 SB
351 2212 1793 (customers.  It showed a picture of a baby, frowning, with the middle finger extended.  The) 1793 SB
351 2271 1763 (picture looked like the baby was giving the photographer \223the finger.\224  The caption read,) 1763 SB
351 2330 1715 (\223Figure 1\224.  After the picture and caption came several customer satisfaction scenarios) 1715 SB
351 2389 1742 (with humorous parodies on how to handle the situations.  Each ended with the solution,) 1742 SB
351 2448 987 (\223See figure 1.\224  Finally, the memo ended like this:) 987 SB
351 2568 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2568 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2600 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2622 12 (1) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2628 10 ( ) 10 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
373 2627 1374 (The Ultimate Entrepreneur -- The Story of Ken Olsen and Digital Equipment Corporation) 1374 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1747 2628 285 (, Glenn Rifkin and) 285 SB
390 2674 1749 (George Harrar, Prima Publishing and Communications, 1988, updated 1990, page 1.  Although I did not attend the) 1749 SB
390 2720 1721 (1987 DECworld, I attended subsequent events in 1990 and 1992.  These shows were every bit as glitzy as Rifkin) 1721 SB
390 2766 727 (and Harrar suggest in their opening paragraphs.) 727 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2831 12 (2) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2837 744 ( \223Digital - The Next Generation\224, Glenn Rifkin, ) 744 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1107 2836 267 (Upside Magazine) 267 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1374 2837 418 (, September 1992, page 28.) 418 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 12 (3) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2908 941 ( I was there and just as arrogant as everyone else inside DEC.) 941 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 6 6
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 25 59 2126 3067 CB
2126 3069 25 (6) 25 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
426 278 1721 (This isn\222t Burger King and you don\222t get it your way.  You get it our way or not at all,) 1721 SB
426 337 1027 (because we\222re Digital and you\222re not!  See figure 1.) 1027 SB
351 429 1797 (Most of us officially frowned on this memo - but most of us also kept a secret copy hidden) 1797 SB
351 488 1786 (away someplace.  And sometimes we really felt and acted this way towards our customers) 1786 SB
351 547 1677 (and partners.  After all, we made better computers than anybody else in the world  --) 1677 SB
351 606 680 (where else were they going to go?) 680 SB
351 698 1367 (This attitude, top to bottom, contributed mightily to DEC\222s undoing.) 1367 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 815 200 (Brief pr) 199 SB
550 815 701 (oduct history and milestones) 701 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 901 1742 (The story of DEC and Ken Olsen is well documented.  The following paragraphs briefly) 1742 SB
351 960 1289 (summarize some of DEC\222s milestones since its founding in 1957:) 1289 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1640 954 16 (4) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1052 185 (PDP-1 --) 185 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
536 1053 1444 ( DEC\222s first computer in 1959.  Rather than using the intimidating name,) 1444 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
351 1112 214 (computer, ) 214 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
565 1112 540 (Olsen called this product a ) 540 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1105 1112 782 (Programmable Data Processor \(PDP\).) 782 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1887 1112 230 (  ;Since this) 230 SB
351 1171 1772 (was the first one, it was the PDP-1.  It featured a cathode-ray tube and keyboard, making) 1772 SB
351 1230 1782 (it the first commercially available, interactive, general-purpose computer.  It was priced at) 1782 SB
351 1289 541 ($120,00  and 53 were sold.) 541 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1381 138 (PDP-6) 138 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
489 1382 1522 ( --DEC\222s first large system, introduced in 1964, and sold for $300,000.  This) 1522 SB
351 1441 1770 (system pioneered the concept of timesharing, but was simply too big for DEC to produce) 1770 SB
351 1500 1582 (at the time.  Only 23 were sold and the product was killed soon after its release.) 1582 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1592 138 (PDP-8) 138 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
489 1593 1636 ( -- Triggered the minicomputer industry.  First introduced in 1965 and priced at an) 1636 SB
351 1652 1740 (unheard-of $18,000, the PDP-8 carried DEC into the ranks of major computer vendors.) 1740 SB
351 1711 894 (DEC eventually sold more than 50,000 units.) 894 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1803 149 (PDP-X) 149 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
500 1804 1650 ( -- The code name for the follow-on machine to the PDP-8, this machine was never) 1650 SB
351 1863 1680 (built.  Edson de Castro, one of the lead designers, left DEC in 1967 and started Data) 1680 SB
351 1922 738 (General with a variant on this design.) 738 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2014 163 (PDP-11) 163 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
514 2015 1538 ( -- introduced in 1970, DEC eventually sold 250,000 units of various PDP-11) 1538 SB
351 2074 1030 (models.  DEC still sells models of PDP 11s in 1994.) 1030 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2166 234 (VAX/VMS) 234 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
585 2167 1366 ( -- First unveiled in 1977, VAX/VMS set the standard for distributed) 1366 SB
351 2226 1707 (computing through most of the 1980s.  VAX/VMS eventually allowed DEC to mount) 1707 SB
351 2285 1751 (credible challenge to IBM.  By late 1987, DEC gained significant market share at IBM\222s) 1751 SB
351 2344 171 (expense.) 171 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2436 144 (VT100) 144 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
495 2437 1629 ( -- Introduced in 1978, this computer terminal spawned an entire terminal industry) 1629 SB
351 2496 1747 (as orders exceeded forecasts by huge margins and lead times stretched to more than one) 1747 SB
351 2555 1778 (year.  Its elegant styling and ergonomic keyboard drove it to become an industry standard) 1778 SB
351 2614 1749 (even to this day.  The VT200, VT300, VT420, and VT510 series terminals followed the) 1749 SB
351 2673 155 (VT100.) 155 SB
351 2848 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2848 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2880 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 12 (4) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2908 10 ( ) 10 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
373 2907 412 (The Ultimate Entrepreneur) 412 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 7 7
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 25 59 2126 3067 CB
2126 3069 25 (7) 25 SB
gr
351 278 433 (Personal Computers) 433 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
784 279 1222 ( -- The Pro 325 and Pro 350, DECmate II, and Rainbow 100,) 1222 SB
351 338 1769 (launched in 1982 were failures.  The Pro series software was ahead of its time and placed) 1769 SB
351 397 1705 (too much burden on the underlying PDP-11 hardware platform.  The DECmate II and) 1705 SB
351 456 1763 (Rainbow 100 systems were technical successes but market flops.  They failed due to lack) 1763 SB
351 515 1691 (of application software and DEC marketing blunders.  The VAXmate, an Intel 80286) 1691 SB
351 574 1742 (machine introduced in 1986, also failed to take off.  It lacked many standard capabilities) 1742 SB
351 633 1795 (for standard clone PCs and was overpriced.  In 1989, DEC began remarketing Tandy PCs,) 1795 SB
351 692 1751 (to limited demand.  The DEC PCs were overpriced and behind the technology curve.  In) 1751 SB
351 751 1719 (1991, DEC opened a 1-800 PC telephone ordering service modeled after Dell.  By late) 1719 SB
351 810 1736 (1991 and early 1992, DEC began building its own PCs and cut its prices to near market) 1736 SB
351 869 1697 (levels.  Sales started to increase and, by mid 1994, DEC is beginning to overcome the) 1697 SB
351 928 1282 (stigma from the early 80s and is emerging as a major PC vendor.) 1282 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1020 163 (Storage) 163 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
514 1021 1629 ( -- DEC first began building its own disk drives in earnest in the early 1980s.  This) 1629 SB
351 1080 1719 (was a fiasco as quality problems appeared all over the place with the early RAxx disks.) 1719 SB
351 1139 1748 (After 2 or 3 years, DEC fixed its manufacturing processes and quality improved.  But as) 1748 SB
351 1198 1755 (DEC storage devices acquired a reputation for reliability, they also acquired a reputation) 1755 SB
351 1257 1695 (for being slow and overpriced.  Third party storage vendors wreaked havoc in DEC\222s) 1695 SB
351 1316 1619 (installed base.  Finally, by 1992, DEC storage made a gutsy decision to change its) 1619 SB
351 1375 1738 (direction.  They canceled their big, proprietary disks and began to concentrate on small,) 1738 SB
351 1434 1756 (standardized SCSI disks.  By 1994, DEC storage devices are competitive with anyone in) 1756 SB
351 1493 1770 (the market on price, performance, and reliability.  DEC StorageWorks devices are widely) 1770 SB
351 1552 1183 (acclaimed as innovative, inexpensive, intelligent controllers.) 1183 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1669 494 (Seeds of destruction) 494 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1780 413 (Abandoned markets) 413 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1856 1663 (Sometime in 1985, the senior managers at DEC decided to abandon their traditional) 1663 SB
351 1915 1781 (market of engineering, manufacturing, and technical customers in favor of the commercial) 1781 SB
351 1974 1709 (data center.  The technical market was messy, difficult to support, and filled with third) 1709 SB
351 2033 1660 (party devices that interfered with the purity of DEC\222s computing environment.  The) 1660 SB
351 2092 1787 (commercial data center market, the traditional IBM stronghold, was flush with money and) 1787 SB
351 2151 1755 (people eager to spend it.  But this new market meant a fundamental shift in DEC\222s focus) 1755 SB
351 2210 774 (and would eventually prove disastrous.) 774 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1125 2204 16 (5) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 2327 408 (Closed Architecture) 408 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2403 1624 (With the PDP-11 in the 1970s, DEC pioneered the Unibus, an open computer bus) 1624 SB
351 2462 1769 (architecture.  With this open bus, third parties could build interface equipment to connect) 1769 SB
351 2521 1614 (factory automation machines, sensors, and other intelligent devices directly to the) 1614 SB
351 2580 1692 (computer.  DEC actively encouraged third parties to build these devices because they) 1692 SB
351 2756 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2756 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2788 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2810 12 (5) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2816 1715 ( Address by Don Harbert, then manager of DEC VMS Engineering, to the VMS Partners, a group of senior DEC) 1715 SB
390 2862 1672 (field software consultants, March 1992 VMS Partner meeting, Nashua, New Hampshire.  As a member of the) 1672 SB
390 2908 512 (VMS Partners group, I was there.) 512 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 8 8
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 25 59 2126 3067 CB
2126 3069 25 (8) 25 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1777 (spawned PDP-11 sales.  DEC\222s first VAX products also had Unibuses and eventually lots) 1777 SB
351 337 434 (of third party devices.) 434 SB
351 429 1665 (By 1985, the Unibus was obsolete and DEC introduced the BI bus in its latest VAX) 1665 SB
351 488 1786 (systems.  But just as vendors made plans to introduce new interface modules, DEC closed) 1786 SB
351 547 1625 (the BI bus.  DEC announced they would sue anybody who marketed a device that) 1625 SB
351 606 1766 (connected to the BI bus unless that company signed an agreement with DEC.  Ken Olsen) 1766 SB
351 665 1708 (defended this strategy:  \223We spent millions developing this bus.  I don\222t know why we) 1708 SB
351 724 395 (didn\222t do it before.\224) 395 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
746 718 16 (6) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
762 724 1326 (  This strategy infuriated many previously loyal DEC VARs \(Value) 1326 SB
351 783 1661 (Added Resellers\), many of whom began shopping for another computer vendor as a) 1661 SB
351 842 1738 (partner.  It also infuriated end user customers, who believed they were being gouged by) 1738 SB
351 901 205 (this move.) 205 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1018 611 (Restrictive Business Practices) 611 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1094 1671 (DEC changed several other business practices during this period.  For example, they) 1671 SB
351 1153 1792 (decreed that software licenses would no longer transfer to the new owner when somebody) 1792 SB
351 1212 1798 (sold a used piece of equipment.  This meant, every time a transaction occurred on the used) 1798 SB
351 1271 1776 (hardware market, the end user would need to buy new software licenses from DEC.  This) 1776 SB
351 1330 1652 (policy further infuriated customers and resellers.  DEC eventually rescinded the no-) 1652 SB
351 1389 1722 (transfer policy for operating systems.  However, typical of DEC business practices, the) 1722 SB
351 1448 1734 (devil is in the details.  DEC kept the policy in force for layered products -- even layered) 1734 SB
351 1507 1655 (products required for the hardware to work.  This meant that DEC demanded - and) 1655 SB
351 1566 1145 (usually got -- a piece of every used equipment transaction) 1145 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1496 1560 16 (7) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1683 274 (Hiring Binge) 274 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1759 1769 (DEC went on a hiring binge in the late 1980s.  Since DEC was going to replace IBM and) 1769 SB
351 1818 1662 (own the data centers of every major corporation in the world, DEC needed industry) 1662 SB
351 1877 1728 (experts for every major industry in the world.  For example, to sell to paper mills, DEC) 1728 SB
351 1936 1691 (needed consultants who knew paper mills forwards and backwards.  To sell to banks,) 1691 SB
351 1995 1779 (DEC needed bankers.  The employee population exploded, along with SG&A expense, as) 1779 SB
351 2054 1739 (DEC hired field sales consultants and layer after layer of administrative staff.  Sales also) 1739 SB
351 2113 749 (increased, but not as fast as expenses:) 749 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 1691 102 328 2203 CB
759 2205 829 (DEC Expense Growth, 1986-1989) 829 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 767 92 328 2305 CB
660 2307 104 (Year) 104 SB
gr
gs 225 92 1095 2305 CB
1159 2307 100 (1986) 100 SB
gr
gs 233 92 1320 2305 CB
1388 2307 100 (1987) 100 SB
gr
gs 232 92 1553 2305 CB
1620 2307 100 (1988) 100 SB
gr
gs 233 92 1785 2305 CB
1853 2307 100 (1989) 100 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
gs 767 92 328 2397 CB
499 2399 426 (Employee Population) 426 SB
gr
gs 225 92 1095 2397 CB
1140 2399 138 (88,300) 138 SB
gr
gs 233 92 1320 2397 CB
1356 2399 163 (103,000) 163 SB
gr
gs 232 92 1553 2397 CB
1588 2399 163 (113,900) 163 SB
gr
gs 233 92 1785 2397 CB
1821 2399 163 (118,400) 163 SB
gr
351 2501 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2501 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2533 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2555 12 (6) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2561 1515 ( This was one of Ken Olsen\222s most famous remarks and was widely quoted in the press at the time.) 1515 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2626 12 (7) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2632 1760 ( DEC continues this absurd policy even in mid 1994.  I recently looked into purchasing a used VAXstation 4000-60) 1760 SB
390 2678 1729 (from a DEC customer for my business.  Selling price would be around $2000 for the vintage 1991 hardware.  But) 1729 SB
390 2724 1709 (in order for DEC to bless the sale, I would need to pay DEC $300 to transfer the VMS operating system license,) 1709 SB
390 2770 1761 (and $2000 for a NAS-250 license.  The existing NAS 250 license would become null and void.  Since the NAS-250) 1761 SB
390 2816 1713 (license includes the windowing software required to run the workstation, DEC\222s policy effectively prevented me) 1713 SB
390 2862 1643 (from buying this equipment for a reasonable price. The customer eventually sold the equipment on the open) 1643 SB
390 2908 1665 (market, likely to a broker.  The broker will either sell the equipment for parts, or resell it on the gray market.) 1665 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 9 9
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 25 59 2126 3067 CB
2126 3069 25 (9) 25 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
gs 767 92 328 276 CB
364 278 697 (SG&A as a percentage of revenues) 697 SB
gr
gs 225 92 1095 276 CB
1131 278 155 (21.94%) 155 SB
gr
gs 233 92 1320 276 CB
1360 278 155 (24.00%) 155 SB
gr
gs 232 92 1553 276 CB
1592 278 155 (26.72%) 155 SB
gr
gs 233 92 1785 276 CB
1825 278 155 (28.56%) 155 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 395 254 (Competition) 254 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 471 1800 (Enter Sun Microsystems.  Founded in the early 1980s, Sun marketed a line of UNIX based) 1800 SB
351 530 1622 (workstations.  As DEC closed its architecture, tightened its licensing policies, and) 1622 SB
351 589 1784 (alienated its partners and customers, Sun seized its opportunity.  As the late 80s unfolded,) 1784 SB
351 648 1702 (\223Open Systems\224 became a popular buzzword across the industry.  Sun brilliantly took) 1702 SB
351 707 1764 (advantage of DEC\222s new policies by branding DEC as a closed, proprietary bloodsucker.) 1764 SB
351 766 881 (Sun\222s sales took off, at the expense of DEC.) 881 SB
351 858 1748 (In late 1988, IBM introduced its AS/400 systems after more than a year of rumors.  The) 1748 SB
351 917 1747 (AS/400 went on to generate roughly $14 billion in annual revenue for IBM -- more than) 1747 SB
351 976 1760 (all of DEC\222s revenue, company wide.  This stopped DEC\222s inroads into IBM\222s midrange) 1760 SB
351 1035 366 (market share cold.) 366 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1152 380 (VAX 9000 Failure) 380 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1228 1763 (Meanwhile, as Sun went after DEC at the low end, DEC went after IBM at the high end.) 1763 SB
351 1287 1730 (One product in DEC\222s arsenal was the ill-fated VAX 9000 mainframe.  The VAX 9000) 1730 SB
351 1346 1785 (took 7 years and cost around $1 Billion to develop.  It started in 1983, when DEC bought) 1785 SB
351 1405 1657 (an equity stake in Trilogy, a company that pioneered multi-chip unit technology.  In) 1657 SB
351 1464 1700 (essence, this technology allowed multiple chips in one \223superchip\224, thereby increasing) 1700 SB
351 1523 1757 (speed.  The VAX 9000 was supposed to hit the market by late 1989.  But it was delayed) 1757 SB
351 1582 1630 (by at least one year, and technical glitches delayed volume shipments even further.) 1630 SB
351 1641 1612 (Ongoing service and support issues also hampered the system and it never sold in) 1612 SB
351 1700 374 (significant volume.) 374 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1817 432 (PRISM Cancellation) 432 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1893 1794 (By 1988, the VAX architecture was 13 years old and showing its age.  Newer RISC based) 1794 SB
351 1952 1596 (architectures from other companies such as HP and Sun promised eventual 100x) 1596 SB
351 2011 1684 (performance improvements over the VAX architecture, and DEC needed a response.) 1684 SB
351 2070 1728 (Dave Cutler, one of the lead VMS architects in the 70s, and his team developed a DEC) 1728 SB
351 2129 1700 (RISC architecture, code named PRISM.  They had prototype implementations up and) 1700 SB
351 2188 1650 (running and were close to commercial development when senior DEC management) 1650 SB
351 2247 1742 (suddenly canceled the project.  The details on the story are controversial, but the results) 1742 SB
351 2306 1216 (are now well known and would eventually prove devastating.) 1216 SB
351 2398 410 (According to Rifkin:) 410 SB
426 2490 1644 (David Cutler, the software genius who oversaw the development of Digital\222s VMS) 1644 SB
426 2549 1719 (operating system, had set up a group in Bellevue, Wash., to build a RISC-based UNIX) 1719 SB
426 2608 1705 (workstation for the company.  Code-named Prism, the group had built prototypes and) 1705 SB
426 2667 1722 (was testing them when Olsen was persuaded to kill the project by Digital\222s West Coast) 1722 SB
426 2726 1665 (workstation group.  Instead, Digital should invest in a startup company called Mips,) 1665 SB
426 2785 1718 (sell the RISC-based workstation Mips was building and continue to enhance the VAX.) 1718 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 10 10
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (10) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
426 278 1657 (A disappointed Cutler left Digital to go to Microsoft, where he has been overseeing) 1657 SB
426 337 602 (development of Windows NT.) 602 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1028 331 16 (8) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 429 920 (The DEC rumor mill paints a different picture.) 920 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1271 423 16 (9) 16 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1287 429 716 (  According to these sources, Cutler) 716 SB
351 488 1736 (became embroiled in a political battle with Jack Shields, then second in command under) 1736 SB
351 547 1368 (Ken Olsen.  Cutler lost, PRISM was canceled, and the rest is history.) 1368 SB
351 639 1776 (Regardless of how it happened, PRISM was canceled, DEC took a 5 percent equity stake) 1776 SB
351 698 1778 (in Mips computer systems, and began to market a line of RISC UNIX workstations based) 1778 SB
351 757 919 (on the Mips R2000 and R3000 series of chips.) 919 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 874 313 (The stage is set) 313 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 950 1775 (During all this, DEC saw its most profitable years ever in 1987 and 1988 as it replaced its) 1775 SB
351 1009 1741 (entire VAX line with updated and faster models.  Profits in 1987 were $1.1 billion, $1.3) 1741 SB
351 1068 1707 (billion in 1988.  Year over year decline began in 1989 and continued through the early) 1707 SB
351 1127 1785 (1990s.  Results improved for a few quarters but the general downward trend is continuing) 1785 SB
351 1186 308 (as of mid 1994.) 308 SB
351 1278 1655 (As 1989 opened, DEC was still an extremely profitable company, but threatened by) 1655 SB
351 1337 1760 (competition from all sides.  It began marketing its Mips based workstations which, at the) 1760 SB
351 1396 1763 (time, were price and price/performance leaders.  VAX sales were still steady but forecast) 1763 SB
351 1455 1629 (to drop.  Software, services, and consulting would eventually lead the company as) 1629 SB
351 1514 631 (hardware became a commodity.) 631 SB
351 2777 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2777 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2809 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2831 12 (8) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2837 744 ( \223Digital - The Next Generation\224, Glenn Rifkin, ) 744 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1107 2836 107 (Upside) 107 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1214 2837 577 ( Magazine, September 1992, page 32.) 577 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 12 (9) 12 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
363 2908 1734 ( This is based on conversations with several \223insiders\224 at DEC who would be in a position to know the true story.) 1734 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 11 11
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (11) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1324 (Corporate Management and) 1324 SB
351 397 1423 (Background of Key Principals) 1423 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 539 1673 (By spring 1994, DEC had 126 vice-presidents by some estimates.  The following list) 1673 SB
351 598 1716 (details a few key players currently or recently at DEC\222s helm.  In the plots within plots) 1716 SB
351 657 1786 (within plots of DEC power politics, these people may not have been the exclusive players.) 1786 SB
351 716 1318 (But these were the names I heard most often around the company.) 1318 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 823 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 827 224 (Ken Olsen) 224 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
725 828 1292 ( -- DEC founder and CEO until October, 1992.  Ken is no longer) 1292 SB
501 887 1607 (formally associated with Digital, although people inside the company still confide) 1607 SB
501 946 186 (with him.) 186 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
687 940 32 (10) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1036 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 1040 264 (Jack Shields) 264 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
765 1041 1298 ( -- Hired in 1961 in the new service organization.  Rose to Senior) 1298 SB
501 1100 1627 (vice-president in charge of field sales and service and second in command.  Left in) 1627 SB
501 1159 113 (1989.) 113 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1249 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 1253 240 (Jack Smith) 240 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
741 1254 1389 ( -- Joined DEC as employee number 12 in 1958.  Rose to Senior vice-) 1389 SB
501 1313 1603 (president under Ken Olsen.  Left in 1993 after Bob Palmer took over.  Author of) 1603 SB
501 1372 1582 (absurd penny pinching policies and proposals, including canceling water coolers) 1582 SB
501 1431 1535 (and magazine subscriptions, and attempting to change payroll from weekly to) 1535 SB
501 1490 189 (biweekly.) 189 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1580 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 1584 249 (Win Hindle) 249 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
750 1585 1340 ( -- Another 30+ year DEC veteran, by mid 1994 is vice-president in) 1340 SB
501 1644 1625 (charge of ethics.  Largely perceived by the rank and file inside DEC as ineffective.) 1625 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1734 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 1738 280 (Bill Strecker ) 280 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
781 1739 1307 (-- Chief technologist.  Strecker was a brilliant engineer and one of) 1307 SB
501 1798 1533 (the original VAX designers.  Somewhere along the way, he became arrogant.) 1533 SB
501 1857 1586 (Strecker addressed the VMS Partners in April, 1991 and at least one member of) 1586 SB
501 1916 1603 (the audience found him to be arrogant and largely ignorant of the evolving world) 1603 SB
501 1975 1635 (around him.  His technology strategy is still controversial; some like it, some don\222t) 1635 SB
501 2034 719 (like it, many don\222t know what it is.  ) 719 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1220 2028 32 (11) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 2124 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 2128 283 (Bill Demmer ) 283 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
784 2129 1331 (-- vice-president in charge of Alpha and VAX systems.  In essence,) 1331 SB
501 2188 1528 (this means Bill is in charge of all Digital hardware development.  Bill lead the) 1528 SB
501 2247 1623 (controversial charge to publicize DEC\222s alpha RISC technology in 1991 and early) 1623 SB
501 2306 1625 (1992, before it was publicly announced.  Some say these early speeches hurt DEC) 1625 SB
501 2365 1499 (by revealing future plans.  Others believe it was important to reveal a future) 1499 SB
501 2424 1582 (direction so customers would believe DEC at least had a strategy for the future.) 1582 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 2514 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 2518 288 (Don Harbert ) 288 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
789 2519 1257 (-- by mid 1994, vice-president of Operating Systems.  Don is in) 1257 SB
501 2578 1411 (charge of VMS, OSF/1 \(DEC UNIX\) and DEC Windows NT software) 1411 SB
501 2637 1620 (engineering.  Don is straightforward and blunt in presentations.  Some see Don as) 1620 SB
351 2731 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2731 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2763 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2785 24 (10) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2791 1670 ( I met with Ken in March, 1993 to discuss some issues.  I have also had conversations with other people  who) 1670 SB
390 2837 1573 (discuss DEC\222s situation with him.  Although he will deny it, Ken Olsen is still very much part of DEC.) 1573 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 24 (11) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2908 1437 ( This is based on my personal observations and conversation with people around the company.) 1437 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Symbol
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 12 12
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (12) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 278 1597 (an ineffective leader with no ability to inspire.  Others appreciate his straight talk) 1597 SB
501 337 600 (and apparent candor in public.) 600 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 427 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 431 266 (Bob Supnik ) 266 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
767 432 1378 (-- vice-president in charge of getting alpha to market.  Bob is popular) 1378 SB
501 491 1582 (with rank and file DEC employees because he regularly mixes it up in electronic) 1582 SB
501 550 1534 (conferences.  Bob also regularly appears in front of DEC employee groups to) 1534 SB
501 609 493 (explain product strategy.) 493 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 699 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 703 252 (Bob Palmer) 252 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
753 704 1304 ( -- DEC CEO as of October, 1992.  Left Texas Instruments in the) 1304 SB
501 763 1552 (1970s to start Mostek, a memory chip company.  United Technologies bought) 1552 SB
501 822 1600 (Mostek a few years later.  Bob took a job with DEC in 1985 as vice-president of) 1600 SB
501 881 1603 (manufacturing.  Tapped by the DEC Board of Directors to succeed Ken Olsen in) 1603 SB
501 940 1603 (July, 1992.  Widely acclaimed as a take-charge manager when promoted, but has) 1603 SB
501 999 1543 (so far failed to deliver results.  Some complained early on because he failed to) 1543 SB
501 1058 1567 (appear live before employee groups and field ad-hoc questions.  Bob set up the) 1567 SB
501 1117 1549 (business unit structure in late 1992 and early 1993.  It fell apart by early 1994.) 1549 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1207 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 1211 259 (Ed Lucente ) 259 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
760 1212 1201 (-- Hired by Bob Palmer in early 1993 to head DEC sales and) 1201 SB
501 1271 1590 (marketing world-wide.  Ed was a long time IBM sales rep and manager.  He left) 1590 SB
501 1330 1524 (IBM to become executive vice-president for sales and marketing at Northern) 1524 SB
501 1389 1621 (Telecom for 2 controversial years.  He was fired from DEC in April, 1994, after a) 1621 SB
501 1448 1556 (disastrous 9 months of FY 1994, especially the third quarter.  Some liked Ed\222s) 1556 SB
501 1507 1432 (take-charge attitude, others found his abrasive management style to be a) 1432 SB
501 1566 205 (hindrance.) 205 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
706 1560 32 (12) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1656 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 1660 401 (Gresham Brebach ) 401 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
902 1661 1232 (-- Hired by Bob Palmer in 1992 from McKinsey Consulting to) 1232 SB
501 1720 1641 (lead Digital Consulting.  By early 1994, has not delivered results in this business as) 1641 SB
501 1779 1494 (morale at the grass roots continues to deteriorate.  In a booming consulting) 1494 SB
501 1838 1360 (market, Digital Consulting is one of DEC\222s biggest disappointments.) 1360 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1928 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 1932 294 (Russ Gullotti ) 294 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
795 1933 1298 (-- Long time DEC veteran, Russ replaced Don Zereski as head of) 1298 SB
501 1992 1536 (U.S. field operations.  By mid 1994., he is head of all Sales and Service in the) 1536 SB
501 2051 1064 (\223Americas Zone\224, essentially the western hemisphere.) 1064 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 2141 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 2145 272 (Don Zereski ) 272 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
773 2146 1261 (-- Replaced Dave Grainger as head of U.S. Sales and Service in) 1261 SB
501 2205 1144 (1991.  He was fired in 1993 for failing to deliver a profit..) 1144 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 2295 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 2299 329 (Dave Grainger ) 329 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
830 2300 1263 (-- Was put in charge of U.S. Sales and Service in 1989 after the) 1263 SB
501 2359 1598 (U. S. slid into the red after 1987.  He was fired in 1991 after a rumored fist-fight) 1598 SB
501 2418 705 (with Zereski in the Mill parking lot.) 705 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1206 2412 32 (13) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2593 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2593 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2625 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2647 24 (12) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2653 1776 ( \223Striving to adapt:  At Digital Equipment, A Resignation Reveals Key Problem: Selling\224, Wall Street Journal, April) 1776 SB
390 2699 254 (26, 1994, page 1) 254 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2764 24 (13) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2770 1708 ( \223The Mill\224 is the old Maynard Mill, in Maynard Mass, DEC\222s original headquarters.  Palmer is moving DEC\222s) 1708 SB
390 2816 1619 (headquarters down the street to a more modern building.  The fist-fight was widely reported inside DEC\222s) 1619 SB
390 2862 1631 (electronic rumor mill, but Grainger and Zereski deny it.  However, after several meetings with Zereski and) 1631 SB
390 2908 962 (witnessing his temper first hand, the fist-fight story is credible.) 962 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Symbol
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 13 13
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (13) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 276 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 280 342 (Enrico Pesatori ) 342 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
843 281 1307 (-- Recruited from Zenith Data Systems, Enrico is now head of the) 1307 SB
501 340 1634 (DEC PC business.  After successfully building the PC business, Enrico was tapped) 1634 SB
501 399 1641 (to fill Lucente\222s former position as head of DEC Sales and Marketing.  After being) 1641 SB
501 458 1609 (a laughingstock in the industry, DEC\222s PC business is one of the few bright spots) 1609 SB
501 517 249 (in mid 1994.) 249 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 607 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
501 611 320 (Charlie Christ ) 320 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
821 612 1194 (-- vice-president and head of the Storage Business Unit.  He) 1194 SB
501 671 1562 (successfully lead the storage group through the painful transition to small, fast,) 1562 SB
501 730 1638 (open products.  DEC\222s storage business was also a laughingstock through the 80s,) 1638 SB
501 789 890 (and one of the few bright spots by mid 1994.) 890 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Symbol
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 14 14
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (14) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 980 (Description of Crisis) 980 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 421 1711 (Some call it a paradigm shift.  Some call it an economic crisis.  Whatever the name, by) 1711 SB
351 480 1735 (1989, the rate of change in the economics of the computer industry accelerated as rapid) 1735 SB
351 539 1734 (innovation and new technology introductions forced prices through the floor.  Consider) 1734 SB
351 598 566 (these jargon-filled examples:) 566 SB
351 690 1719 (In mid 1994, I can buy an IBM compatible PC with 50-60 times the CPU power of the) 1719 SB
351 749 1696 (original DEC VAX 11/780, 24 MB memory, 1 GB of disk space, 600 MB CD-ROM,) 1696 SB
351 808 1649 (screaming fast 1024 X 768 resolution color graphics display, for roughly $6000 list) 1649 SB
351 867 98 (price) 98 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
449 861 32 (14) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
481 867 1654 (.  For less than $10,000, I can buy a similarly configured RISC system with roughly) 1654 SB
351 926 955 (150 times the CPU power of that original VAX.) 955 SB
351 1018 1787 (The original VAX 11/780 with assorted peripheral devices sold for roughly $500,000.  By) 1787 SB
351 1077 1770 (mid 1994, I can buy a low end PC with more disk space and memory, better applications,) 1770 SB
351 1136 782 (and 3 year warranty for roughly $1500.) 782 SB
351 1228 1681 (By mid 1994, people buy computers from warehouse superstores, catalogs, or 1-800) 1681 SB
351 1287 1683 (telephone numbers.  Personal computers make up more than half the entire market in) 1683 SB
351 1346 1657 (dollar volume.  In 1984, most computers were sold direct from vendors to end-user) 1657 SB
351 1405 1570 (customers with lots of hand-holding.  Personal computers were expensive toys.) 1570 SB
351 1497 1764 (In 1994, Microsoft Office, a personal computer software package, lists at Computer City) 1764 SB
351 1556 1646 (Superstore for roughly $500.  The product bundles a WYSIWYG word-processor,) 1646 SB
351 1615 1556 (spreadsheet, database, and slide presentation package into a single offering.  A) 1556 SB
351 1674 1621 (WYSIWYG \(What You See is What You Get\) word processor allows the user to) 1621 SB
351 1733 1759 (compose a document, complete with graphics, on a computer screen and actually see the) 1759 SB
351 1792 1796 (document on the screen as it will appear when she sends it to her attached laser printer.  In) 1796 SB
351 1851 1792 (1984, minicomputer and mainframe based word processing packages alone cost thousands) 1792 SB
351 1910 1774 (and thousands of dollars and offered far fewer capabilities.  WYSIWYG did not yet exist.) 1774 SB
351 2002 1747 (As systems become smaller, faster, cheaper, and more powerful, the computer hardware) 1747 SB
351 2061 1797 (and software markets continue to change radically from low volume, high margin products) 1797 SB
351 2120 1679 (to high volume, low margin, commodity products.  As this unprecedented revolution) 1679 SB
351 2179 1648 (sweeps the industry, brutal competition forces faster and faster innovation and ever) 1648 SB
351 2238 1622 (shorter product cycles.  Vendors who refuse to accept this new paradigm will die.) 1622 SB
351 2297 1219 (Vendors who learn to exploit this new paradigm will prosper.) 1219 SB
351 2389 1646 (DEC was caught flat-footed and arrogant, starting in late 1988, after several wildly) 1646 SB
351 2448 329 (successful years.) 329 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2565 410 (Deteriorating Pr) 409 SB
760 2565 418 (ofit \(Loss\) Pictur) 417 SB
1177 2565 26 (e) 26 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2651 1385 (The deteriorating financial picture of the 1990s sums up DEC\222s crisis:) 1385 SB
351 2756 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2756 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2788 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2810 24 (14) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2816 1707 ( Digital PC Catalog, Spring 1994; see the model DEC PC XL 560 with associated peripheral devices.  Note that) 1707 SB
390 2862 1736 (prices are incorrect in this catalog due to a price reduction in March, 1994.  I took delivery on this system in May,) 1736 SB
390 2908 502 (1994 for my consulting business.) 502 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 15 15
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (15) 50 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
345 5 339 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 685 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
192 5 691 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 884 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
190 5 890 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1081 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
191 5 1087 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1279 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
190 5 1285 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1476 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
191 5 1482 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1674 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
190 5 1680 276 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 117 685 282 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
gs 345 65 340 276 CB
420 284 187 (Dollars x) 187 SB
gr
gs 345 65 340 335 CB
413 343 201 (1,000,000) 201 SB
gr
gs 196 65 688 276 CB
736 284 100 (1993) 100 SB
gr
gs 197 65 884 276 CB
933 284 100 (1992) 100 SB
gr
gs 198 65 1081 276 CB
1131 284 100 (1991) 100 SB
gr
gs 197 65 1279 276 CB
1328 284 100 (1990) 100 SB
gr
gs 198 65 1476 276 CB
1526 284 100 (1989) 100 SB
gr
gs 197 65 1674 276 CB
1723 284 100 (1988) 100 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
345 2 339 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 685 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
195 2 688 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 884 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
193 2 887 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1081 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
194 2 1084 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1279 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
193 2 1282 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1476 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
194 2 1479 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1674 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
193 2 1677 400 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 58 685 403 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
gs 345 62 340 400 CB
351 405 172 (Revenue) 172 SB
gr
gs 196 62 688 400 CB
736 405 138 (14,371) 138 SB
gr
gs 197 62 884 400 CB
933 405 138 (13,931) 138 SB
gr
gs 198 62 1081 400 CB
1131 405 138 (13,911) 138 SB
gr
gs 197 62 1279 400 CB
1328 405 138 (12,942) 138 SB
gr
gs 198 62 1476 400 CB
1526 405 138 (12,742) 138 SB
gr
gs 197 62 1674 400 CB
1723 405 138 (11,475) 138 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
345 5 339 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 58 685 462 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 685 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
192 5 691 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 884 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
190 5 890 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1081 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
191 5 1087 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1279 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
190 5 1285 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1476 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
191 5 1482 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1674 521 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
190 5 1680 521 B
1 F
n
gs 345 59 340 462 CB
351 464 254 (Profit \(Loss\)) 254 SB
gr
gs 196 59 688 462 CB
765 464 109 (\(251\)) 109 SB
gr
gs 197 59 884 462 CB
924 464 147 (\(2,796\)) 147 SB
gr
gs 198 59 1081 462 CB
1160 464 109 (\(617\)) 109 SB
gr
gs 197 59 1279 462 CB
1416 464 50 (74) 50 SB
gr
gs 198 59 1476 462 CB
1551 464 113 (1,073) 113 SB
gr
gs 197 59 1674 462 CB
1748 464 113 (1,306) 113 SB
gr
351 588 1393 (\(The losses in 1991 and 1992 included massive restructuring charges.\)) 1393 SB
351 680 1757 (As the first three quarters of 1994 unfold, the story gets even bleaker.  DEC\222s revenue is) 1757 SB
351 739 1336 (now shrinking as VAX sales decline and Alpha fails to compensate.) 1336 SB
/fm 256 def
250 5 327 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 578 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
241 5 584 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 826 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
240 5 832 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1073 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
194 5 1079 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1274 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
163 5 1280 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1444 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
164 5 1450 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1615 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
164 5 1621 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1786 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
164 5 1792 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1957 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
209 5 1963 829 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 150 578 835 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
gs 250 65 328 829 CB
351 837 187 (Dollars x) 187 SB
gr
gs 250 65 328 888 CB
351 896 201 (1,000,000) 201 SB
gr
gs 245 65 581 829 CB
612 837 182 (9 months) 182 SB
gr
gs 245 98 581 888 CB
653 896 100 (1994) 100 SB
gr
gs 247 65 826 829 CB
859 837 182 (9 months) 182 SB
gr
gs 247 98 826 888 CB
900 896 100 (1993) 100 SB
gr
gs 201 65 1073 829 CB
1143 837 61 (Q3) 61 SB
gr
gs 201 98 1073 888 CB
1120 896 107 (FY94) 107 SB
gr
gs 170 65 1274 829 CB
1329 837 61 (Q3) 61 SB
gr
gs 170 98 1274 888 CB
1306 896 107 (FY93) 107 SB
gr
gs 171 65 1444 829 CB
1500 837 61 (Q2) 61 SB
gr
gs 171 98 1444 888 CB
1477 896 107 (FY94) 107 SB
gr
gs 171 65 1615 829 CB
1671 837 61 (Q2) 61 SB
gr
gs 171 98 1615 888 CB
1648 896 107 (FY93) 107 SB
gr
gs 171 65 1786 829 CB
1842 837 61 (Q1) 61 SB
gr
gs 171 98 1786 888 CB
1819 896 107 (FY94) 107 SB
gr
gs 216 65 1957 829 CB
2000 837 131 (Q1 FY) 131 SB
gr
gs 216 98 1957 888 CB
2015 896 100 (1993) 100 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
250 2 327 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 578 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
244 2 581 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 826 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
243 2 829 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1073 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
197 2 1076 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1274 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
166 2 1277 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1444 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
167 2 1447 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1615 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
167 2 1618 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1786 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
167 2 1789 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1957 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
212 2 1960 986 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 91 578 989 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
gs 250 62 328 986 CB
351 991 172 (Revenue) 172 SB
gr
gs 245 95 581 986 CB
602 991 113 (9,528) 113 SB
gr
gs 247 95 826 986 CB
849 991 138 (10,457) 138 SB
gr
gs 201 95 1073 986 CB
1096 991 113 (3,259) 113 SB
gr
gs 170 95 1274 986 CB
1297 991 113 (3,454) 113 SB
gr
gs 171 95 1444 986 CB
1468 991 113 (3,254) 113 SB
gr
gs 171 95 1615 986 CB
1639 991 113 (3,689) 113 SB
gr
gs 171 95 1786 986 CB
1810 991 113 (3,015) 113 SB
gr
gs 216 95 1957 986 CB
1980 991 113 (3,314) 113 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
250 5 327 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 117 578 1081 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 578 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
241 5 584 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 826 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
240 5 832 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1073 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
194 5 1079 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1274 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
163 5 1280 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1444 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
164 5 1450 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1615 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
164 5 1621 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1786 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
164 5 1792 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1957 1199 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
209 5 1963 1199 B
1 F
n
gs 250 59 328 1081 CB
351 1083 113 (Profit) 113 SB
gr
gs 250 59 328 1140 CB
351 1142 128 (\(Loss\)) 128 SB
gr
gs 245 92 581 1081 CB
602 1083 109 (\(339\)) 109 SB
gr
gs 247 92 826 1081 CB
849 1083 109 (\(365\)) 109 SB
gr
gs 201 92 1073 1081 CB
1096 1083 109 (\(183\)) 109 SB
gr
gs 170 92 1274 1081 CB
1297 1083 84 (\(30\)) 84 SB
gr
gs 171 92 1444 1081 CB
1468 1083 84 (\(72\)) 84 SB
gr
gs 171 92 1615 1081 CB
1639 1083 84 (\(74\)) 84 SB
gr
gs 171 92 1786 1081 CB
1810 1083 84 (\(83\)) 84 SB
gr
gs 216 92 1957 1081 CB
1980 1083 109 (\(261\)) 109 SB
gr
351 1299 1681 (DEC has had only one profitable quarter since 1991.  This occurred in Q4, FY 1993.) 1681 SB
351 1358 1694 (According to statements from DEC senior managers, the U.S. has not been profitable) 1694 SB
351 1417 225 (since 1987.) 225 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
576 1411 32 (15) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1509 1726 (In the 1980s, DEC was essentially debt free and boasted of a AAA bond rating.  At the) 1726 SB
351 1568 1750 (end of Q3, 1994, Standard and Poors downgraded DEC\222s senior debt again to BBB and) 1750 SB
351 1627 1682 (put the ratings on credit watch with negative implications.  Moodys also put the debt) 1682 SB
351 1686 750 (under review for possible downgrade.) 750 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1101 1680 32 (16) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1133 1686 1012 (  In March, the company tried to raise $500 million) 1012 SB
351 1745 1479 (with a preferred-stock issue, but it could find buyers for only $400 million.) 1479 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1830 1739 32 (17) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1837 1780 (The only reason DEC is still alive is its strong balance sheet from the 1980s.  But many of) 1780 SB
351 1896 1659 (those assets are long gone.  The statistics are staggering:  From the end of FY 1990) 1659 SB
351 1955 1020 (through the end of Q3 FY 1994, DEC lost roughly ) 1020 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1371 1955 194 ($4 billion) 194 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1565 1955 523 (.  Even with these massive) 523 SB
351 2014 1163 (losses, assets still outweigh liabilities by roughly $5 billion.) 1163 SB
351 2106 1764 (The company took a $1.5 billion charge for restructuring reserves in 1992, $1.1 billion in) 1764 SB
351 2165 1617 (1991, and $550 million in 1990.  At the end of Q3 1994, only $276 million of this) 1617 SB
351 2224 1630 (restructuring reserve is left.  Most analysts believe DEC will need another massive) 1630 SB
351 2283 1727 (restructuring charge in the current quarter of 1994 to cover additional layoffs and plant) 1727 SB
351 2342 172 (closings.) 172 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
523 2336 32 (18) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2543 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2543 221 (                 ) 221 SB
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2575 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2597 24 (15) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2603 1695 ( Don Zereski, then DEC vice-president of the U.S. Field, in an address to a gathering of DEC field consultants,) 1695 SB
390 2649 1723 (March, 1992.  Although unlikely, FY 1993 may have been profitable in the U.S.  DEC does not disclose segment) 1723 SB
390 2695 927 (by segment financial data in its public disclosure statements.) 927 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2760 24 (16) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2766 757 ( \223Digital Officers Promise Major Restructuring\224, ) 757 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1132 2765 364 (The Wall Street Journal) 364 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1496 2766 554 (, April 18, 1994, pages A3 and A14.) 554 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2831 24 (17) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2837 442 ( \223Desperate Hours at DEC\224, ) 442 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
817 2836 222 (Business Week) 222 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1039 2837 362 (, May 9, 1994, page 27.) 362 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 24 (18) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2908 571 ( \223Desperate Hours at DEC\224, page 27.) 571 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 16 16
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (16) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1773 (Perhaps even more devastating than the financial statistics is the effect on people, morale,) 1773 SB
351 337 1761 (and self-worth.  The first layoffs started in manufacturing in 1990 as DEC began to close) 1761 SB
351 396 1719 (plants.  Layoffs hit Minneapolis and other field offices in earnest in July, 1991, again in) 1719 SB
351 455 1795 (October, 1991, and generally once per quarter since then.  Before July 1991, the employee) 1795 SB
351 514 1743 (population in Minneapolis was roughly 350.  By early 1994, the population was roughly) 1743 SB
351 573 367 (120 and shrinking.) 367 SB
351 665 1707 (Whispered conversations in the hallways, weekly rumors about a massive layoff round) 1707 SB
351 724 1795 (next week, managers who disappear to mysterious, closed-door meetings, hidden agendas,) 1795 SB
351 783 1717 (and plots within plots within plots are now standard operating procedure inside Digital) 1717 SB
351 842 1736 (Equipment Corporation.  It is sickening to watch a once mighty company stoop so low.) 1736 SB
351 934 1112 (DEC must return to profitability very soon or it will die.) 1112 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 17 17
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (17) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1198 (Remedial Steps and their) 1198 SB
351 397 634 (effectiveness) 634 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 572 71 (W) 70 SB
421 572 456 (orkstation W) 455 SB
876 572 439 (ars -- So Far) 435 SB
1311 572 380 (, DEC Lost) 380 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 684 1767 (The senior managers inside DEC never figured this out, but at the grass roots, we all saw) 1767 SB
351 743 1772 (it coming:  The days of the refrigerator sized computers were numbered.  The days of the) 1772 SB
351 802 1717 (liquid cooled mainframe were already over, but some people just had not figured it out) 1717 SB
351 861 1673 (yet.  Customers would no longer buy a system for the elegant hardware design.  The) 1673 SB
351 920 1727 (power in the industry shifted from traditional hardware vendors to application software) 1727 SB
351 979 170 (vendors.) 170 SB
351 1071 1778 (As sales of high margin midrange and high end systems declined, the low end, low margin) 1778 SB
351 1130 1731 (market exploded.  New workstations hitting the market packed as much CPU power as) 1731 SB
351 1189 1750 (small mainframes at a fraction of the cost.  Local area networks \(LANs\) of workstations) 1750 SB
351 1248 1689 (were more flexible and, under certain conditions, more powerful than any mainframe.) 1689 SB
351 1340 1749 (DEC introduced the DECstation 3100 in early 1989, to rave reviews.  DEC\222s first RISC) 1749 SB
351 1399 1564 (UNIX workstation with Mips chips, it sold for roughly $20,000 and packed 10) 1564 SB
351 1458 556 (SPECmarks of CPU power.) 556 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
907 1452 32 (19) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
939 1458 1098 (  This was 10 times more powerful than DEC\222s original) 1098 SB
351 1517 1609 ($500,000 VAX 11/780 from 1977 and, for a few short weeks, the most powerful) 1609 SB
351 1576 538 (workstation on the market.) 538 SB
351 1668 1759 (DEC also introduced the VAXstation 3100, a 3 SPECmark VAX/VMS workstation that) 1759 SB
351 1727 1765 (ran the VMS operating system and all its popular applications.  Although the VAX could) 1765 SB
351 1786 1710 (not sustain the same speed improvements as RISC based processors, VMS had a huge) 1710 SB
351 1845 1776 (installed base and millions of customers hungry for inexpensive platforms on which to run) 1776 SB
351 1904 40 (it.) 40 SB
351 1996 1716 (DECwindows was a breakthrough software innovation, based on the X-Window work) 1716 SB
351 2055 1774 (from MIT.  Unlike traditional computer windowing systems, DECwindows allowed users) 1774 SB
351 2114 1710 (to run applications anywhere on the network to display on their desktop workstations.) 1710 SB
351 2173 1626 (Properly engineered applications could run number-crunching jobs on, say, a Cray) 1626 SB
351 2232 1745 (supercomputer host, and present a point and click graphical user interface to a user on a) 1745 SB
351 2291 1185 (DECwindows workstation on the other end of the network.) 1185 SB
351 2526 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2526 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2558 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2580 24 (19) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2586 1758 ( The SPEC consortium consists of representatives from computer industry vendors.  Its charter:  to come up with an) 1758 SB
390 2632 1584 (industry standard method of measuring CPU performance for all vendors.  By 1989, SPEC produced the) 1584 SB
390 2678 1733 (SPECmark, an average of 10 benchmarks normalized to the speed of the original VAX 11/780.  By definition, the) 1733 SB
390 2724 1715 (VAX 11/780 was a 1 SPECmark machine.  A 10 SPECmark machine completed the SPEC benchmarks 10 times) 1715 SB
390 2770 1688 (faster than the VAX 11/780.  Before long, all the vendors figured out ways to \221cheat\224, so the SPEC consortium) 1688 SB
390 2816 1609 (updated their suite of benchmarks in 1992.  SPEC now publishes 2 numbers: SPECfp92 for floating point) 1609 SB
390 2862 1755 (operations and SPECint92 for integer and other operations.  The original SPECmark was renamed SPEC89.  SPEC) 1755 SB
390 2908 1428 (no longer sanctions use of the single SPEC89 number because its accuracy was compromised.) 1428 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 18 18
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (18) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1181 (The technology was revolutionary and DEC was there first.) 1181 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1532 272 32 (20) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 370 1393 (By mid 1990, DEC was a significant player in the workstation market.) 1393 SB
351 462 1757 (Soon after, the DECstation 5000 and follow-on VAXstation models hit the market.  The) 1757 SB
351 521 1795 (new DECstation packed more than 20 SPECmarks of CPU power -- more than double the) 1795 SB
351 580 1768 (original DECstation 3100 and nearly 7 times the original VAXstation 3100 -- for roughly) 1768 SB
351 639 1681 (the same price as the DECstation 3100.  Performance eventually doubled on the new) 1681 SB
351 698 941 (VAXstations, from 3 SPECmarks to roughly 6.) 941 SB
351 790 1625 (Storm clouds were gathering.  IBM introduced its new POWER architecture.  HP) 1625 SB
351 849 1786 (improved its PA-RISC architecture.  Sun brought new versions of its SPARC architecture) 1786 SB
351 908 1636 (to market.  Before long, HP and IBM were duking it out for bragging rights as the) 1636 SB
351 967 1748 (performance leader, with CPUs at roughly 50 SPECmarks and promises for hundreds of) 1748 SB
351 1026 1745 (SPECmarks in the near future.  Suddenly, the DECstation was no longer the leader, and) 1745 SB
351 1085 697 (the VAX was not even in the pack.) 697 SB
351 1177 1695 (DECstation sales never took off, due mostly to lack of application software.  Nobody) 1695 SB
351 1236 1768 (from DEC seriously recruited application vendors to port their software to Ultrix, DEC\222s) 1768 SB
351 1295 1746 (UNIX offering at the time.  Other technical problems also surfaced with Ultrix.  Lack of) 1746 SB
351 1354 1656 (shared libraries was one of the most important.  Since many of the important UNIX) 1656 SB
351 1413 1726 (application software packages depended on shared libraries, it became very difficult for) 1726 SB
351 1472 1781 (software vendors to port their product to the DECstations.  Further, since DEC could not) 1781 SB
351 1531 1732 (provide assurances of sufficient sales volume, many application vendors stayed away or) 1732 SB
351 1590 694 (put DEC low on their priority lists.) 694 SB
351 1682 1698 (The VAXstation enjoyed moderate success, but performance lagged badly against the) 1698 SB
351 1741 1686 (competition.  The VAXstation 4000, due in fall 1990, slipped month by month for an) 1686 SB
351 1800 1783 (entire year.  It finally started shipping in late 1991.  At roughly 12 SPECmarks, it was fast) 1783 SB
351 1859 1685 (by VAX standards, but obsolete versus the competition even before it hit the market.) 1685 SB
351 1918 1725 (DEC lost major customers and credibility from this VAXstation debacle.  For example,) 1725 SB
351 1977 1764 (one department at 3M changed their strategic direction away from DEC and VMS to HP) 1764 SB
351 2036 1787 (and HP-UX \(HP\222s version of UNIX\).  This cost the sales team in Minneapolis at least 200) 1787 SB
351 2095 108 (units.) 108 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
459 2089 32 (21) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
491 2095 1414 (  Reports of similar situations came from around the world as DEC lost) 1414 SB
351 2154 518 (workstation market share.) 518 SB
351 2476 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2476 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2508 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2530 24 (20) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2536 1629 ( At that time, a big component of my job was to demonstrate this technology to potential customers.  It was) 1629 SB
390 2582 882 (genuinely exciting to watch the skeptics become converts.) 882 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2647 24 (21) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2653 1717 ( My ears still ring from tongue lashings I took from the people at 3M during nondisclosure presentations in 1990) 1717 SB
390 2699 1714 (and 1991.  After DEC broke promise after promise, the people at 3M finally became disgusted and started to get) 1714 SB
390 2745 1667 (rid of VMS in favor of HP and UNIX.  DEC lost 200 seats in this department alone.  DEC lost thousands and) 1667 SB
390 2791 1264 (thousands of seats around the world due to similar situations with other customers.) 1264 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 19 19
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (19) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 278 284 (Argenti\222) 283 SB
634 278 873 (s Model Starts to Kick In) 873 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
1507 265 56 (22) 56 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 390 1662 (As DEC lost market share in workstations, sales of larger and more profitable VAX) 1662 SB
351 449 1749 (systems also started to slide.  The VAX 9000 mainframe was an expensive technical and) 1749 SB
351 508 1752 (business flop as sales failed to even come close to projections and service proved to be a) 1752 SB
351 567 211 (nightmare.) 211 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 684 287 (Constraints) 287 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 770 1749 (By late 1991 and early 1992, DEC all but abandoned its DECwindows development and) 1749 SB
351 829 1795 (laid off or reassigned most of the engineering team.  Its other layered software engineering) 1795 SB
351 888 1784 (groups found themselves in constant turmoil as managers fought turf battles for dwindling) 1784 SB
351 947 1778 (budgets.  Rumors flew around the world across the electronic grapevine about the demise) 1778 SB
351 1006 720 (of various popular layered products.) 720 SB
351 1098 1656 (In the field, presales consultants were asked to find ways to bill customers for work) 1656 SB
351 1157 1703 (formerly done for free.  Pressure mounted to cut back on trade show appearances and) 1703 SB
351 1216 507 (local marketing activities.) 507 SB
351 1308 1784 (In 1992, DEC closed the VAX 9000 plant in California and quietly started removing them) 1784 SB
351 1367 281 (from the field.) 281 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1484 620 (Mismanaged Change, Cr) 619 SB
970 1484 843 (eative Bookkeeping, Backstabbing) 843 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1570 1780 (As DEC found itself with too many people at headquarters and apparently too few people) 1780 SB
351 1629 1710 (in the field, it started \223Career Opportunity Days\224.  These were one or two day internal) 1710 SB
351 1688 1696 (\223job fairs\224, where interested people could interview with managers of field groups for) 1696 SB
351 1747 1756 (positions in local service offices.  Participants report the sessions were poorly organized;) 1756 SB
351 1806 1633 (in many cases, managers and potential interviewees did not know who they should) 1633 SB
351 1865 875 (interview, or when or where they should be.) 875 SB
351 1957 1747 (Senior management promised to set up a central fund to pay for all this.  However, after) 1747 SB
351 2016 1750 (local offices hired and relocated several people in 1990 and 1991, the newly reorganized) 1750 SB
351 2075 1736 (senior management team changed their minds and dictated local offices would pay from) 1736 SB
351 2134 1648 (their own budgets.  Since local offices had no budgets for any of this activity, other) 1648 SB
351 2193 473 (budgets were squeezed.) 473 SB
351 2285 1725 (Results were less than satisfactory.  One case in Minneapolis is typical:  DEC relocated) 1725 SB
351 2344 1724 (Karen from New England to Minneapolis, at a cost of several thousand dollars, put her) 1724 SB
351 2403 1739 (through several months of UNIX training, spending several more thousand dollars, then) 1739 SB
351 2462 1716 (finally turned her loose with customers as a UNIX Software Specialist.  Karen worked) 1716 SB
351 2521 1739 (hard and began building a good reputation with customers.  But after just over one year) 1739 SB
351 2580 1730 (on the new job, DEC managers in Minneapolis laid her off in the fall 1992.  In a market) 1730 SB
351 2639 1720 (demanding UNIX expertise, DEC in Minneapolis threw away 18 months of investment) 1720 SB
351 2802 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2802 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2834 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2856 24 (22) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2862 737 ( We discussed Argenti\222s model in class 2/7/94.  ) 737 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1112 2861 742 (Corporate Collapse:  The Causes and Symptoms) 742 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1854 2862 226 (, John Argenti,) 226 SB
390 2908 331 (Halstead Press, 1976.) 331 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 20 20
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (20) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1640 (and its only UNIX expertise.  Similar stories from around the world filled the DEC) 1640 SB
351 337 481 (electronic mail network.) 481 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 454 519 (Alpha -- \223The Big Pr) 518 SB
869 454 147 (oject\224) 147 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 540 1752 (Meanwhile, DEC quietly revived development on its own RISC chip, newly code named) 1752 SB
351 599 1728 (\223Alpha\224, as it became clear the VAX architecture could not perform anywhere near the) 1728 SB
351 658 1641 (speed of the newer RISC architectures.  The original PRISM was altered with new) 1641 SB
351 717 1645 (capabilities that would allow it to run VMS, UNIX, or any other popular operating) 1645 SB
351 776 1703 (system.  An advanced development project quietly started to investigate porting VMS) 1703 SB
351 835 904 (from the VAX to the new Alpha architecture.) 904 SB
351 927 1648 (As the project gained momentum through 1990 and 1991, word leaked out about a) 1648 SB
351 986 903 (mysterious new RISC architecture from DEC) 903 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1254 980 32 (23) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1286 986 829 (.  DEC publicly introduced the first Alpha) 829 SB
351 1045 1689 (RISC chip at the annual ISSSC convention in February, 1992.  It was a mob scene as) 1689 SB
351 1104 1393 (people clamored for more information and a look at this hot new chip.) 1393 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1744 1098 32 (24) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1196 1708 (VMS porting work continued in earnest and VMS Engineering delivered Alpha VMS,) 1708 SB
351 1255 1751 (version 1.0, on schedule in November, 1992.  Version 1.5 followed shortly after in May,) 1751 SB
351 1314 1768 (1993.  By May, 1994, VMS on the Alpha platform had all the capabilities of VMS on the) 1768 SB
351 1373 1700 (VAX platform as DEC simultaneously shipped VMS version 6.1 for VAX and Alpha.) 1700 SB
351 1432 837 (This was a monumental technical triumph.) 837 SB
351 1524 1295 (DEC had a bold strategy to conquer the market on several levels:) 1295 SB
351 1616 1773 (First, it would establish Alpha as the industry standard 64 bit chip for the 21st century.  It) 1773 SB
351 1675 1743 (would do this by inventing the most powerful and bullet-proof RISC architecture on the) 1743 SB
351 1734 1710 (market and convincing system vendors and partners to use it.  DEC would also recruit) 1710 SB
351 1793 1770 (other manufacturing foundries to build Alpha chips, which would provide second sources) 1770 SB
351 1852 1754 (for system vendors.  Alpha chips would be everywhere -- from factory assembly lines, to) 1754 SB
351 1911 1258 (controlling fuel/air mixtures in automobiles, to kitchen toasters.) 1258 SB
351 2003 1755 (DEC would also build its own systems based on Alpha chips and would migrate all of its) 1755 SB
351 2062 1619 (software to run on alpha based platforms.  These systems would lead the world in) 1619 SB
351 2121 1793 (performance, price/performance, and every relevant performance benchmark.  They would) 1793 SB
351 2180 1093 (be years ahead of anything the competition could offer.) 1093 SB
351 2317 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2317 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2349 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2371 24 (23) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2377 1701 ( A few VMS partners and I were sources of some of these early leaks in 1990.  Lacking approved nondisclosure) 1701 SB
390 2423 1740 (presentations, we made our own presentations and delivered to key customers we were in danger of losing.  These) 1740 SB
390 2469 1677 (were customers who were genuinely concerned about DEC\222s future research and development investments.  If) 1677 SB
390 2515 1703 (DEC had no plan to at least keep up with the rest of the industry, they would defect.  If we could convince them) 1703 SB
390 2561 1718 (DEC had a credible plan, we could hopefully keep them in our camp.  In Minnesota, this strategy worked well at) 1718 SB
390 2607 1682 (Mayo Clinic, not so well at 3M.  Eventually, vice-president Bill Demmer began making public speeches about) 1682 SB
390 2653 1716 (alpha and the floodgates opened.  Some members of the press criticize those early leaks, but I still believe it was) 1716 SB
390 2699 1727 (the right thing to do.  Without early notice to key customers, we would have lost many of them to the competition) 1727 SB
390 2745 578 (before we had any chance to compete.) 578 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2810 24 (24) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2816 400 ( The ISSSC convention is ) 400 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 36 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
775 2814 59 (the ) 59 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
834 2816 1251 (convention for chipmakeers.  Vendors deliver technical papers and introduce their) 1251 SB
390 2862 1711 (wares at these shows.  People who were there at the 1992 show wrote memos vividly describing people lined 10) 1711 SB
390 2908 1149 (deep all around Dan Dobberpuhl, the DEC presenter, clamoring for details.) 1149 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 21 21
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (21) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1576 (But something happened between the chip announcement in February 1992 and) 1576 SB
351 337 1626 (introduction of formal products in November, 1992.  The introduction was poorly) 1626 SB
351 396 1689 (coordinated, unclear, and unenthusiastic.  DEC failed to communicate its plans to the) 1689 SB
351 455 1799 (buying public or generate any confidence in its ability to deliver.  Problems with DEC sales) 1799 SB
351 514 1094 (and management were widely documented in the press.) 1094 SB
351 606 1736 (Sales did not take off as expected, DEC never did recruit partners to generate sufficient) 1736 SB
351 665 1771 (sales volume, and, by mid 1994, far from becoming an emerging industry standard, Alpha) 1771 SB
351 724 550 (is fast becoming a footnote.) 550 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 841 704 (Why isn\222t Alpha Successful?) 704 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 927 1742 (I was unable to find anybody inside DEC who would tell a candid story on the failure to) 1742 SB
351 986 1325 (recruit significant partners.  As a former insider, I offer this theory.) 1325 SB
351 1078 1747 (DEC lost much of its credibility in the mid 1980s when it closed the BI bus and changed) 1747 SB
351 1137 1796 (business practices.  Many vendors who depended on DEC went out of business because of) 1796 SB
351 1196 1680 (this change.  Even through mid 1994, DEC is only grudgingly and slowly opening its) 1680 SB
351 1255 1774 (business practices.  Nobody wants to depend on a partner who will stab them in the back.) 1774 SB
351 1347 1712 (DEC wants to sell Alpha chips to other system vendors and use Alpha chips in its own) 1712 SB
351 1406 1696 (systems.  These system vendors will eventually compete with DEC , yet they will also) 1696 SB
351 1465 1621 (depend on DEC as a supplier -- a risky relationship, especially for a vendor with a) 1621 SB
351 1524 927 (reputation for stabbing its partners in the back.) 927 SB
351 1616 1739 (DEC has lots of excess manufacturing capacity, and more coming online soon.  With all) 1739 SB
351 1675 1701 (this capacity, potential second source chip vendors are reluctant to invest in their own) 1701 SB
351 1734 1725 (production facilities to build potentially competing chips.  So none of the major players) 1725 SB
351 1793 676 (have signed on as second sources.) 676 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1918 71 (W) 70 SB
421 1918 905 (aves of Reorganizaztions) 905 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2030 1723 (Most of DEC\222s turnaround efforts centered around constant reorganization.  The DEC) 1723 SB
351 2089 1767 (electronic grapevine compared the situation to a bird cage; as somebody shakes the cage,) 1767 SB
351 2148 1669 (the birds all fly in the air and land in different spots.  Ken Olsen shook the cage for a) 1669 SB
351 2207 736 (while, then it was Bob Palmer\222s turn.) 736 SB
351 2299 1703 (The situation deteriorated from 1991 through mid 1994 as vice-presidents were hired,) 1703 SB
351 2358 572 (fired, and built their empires.) 572 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2475 1100 (Round One -- The New Management System) 1100 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2561 1779 (In 1991, Ken Olsen tried to attack the problem by reorganizing the company around \223The) 1779 SB
351 2620 1738 (New Management System\224.  Sweeping reorganizations had worked at least twice in the) 1738 SB
351 2679 1740 (past; first in the 1960s when DEC set up the now famous matrix management structure,) 1740 SB
351 2738 1322 (and again in 1983 when DEC dismantled its product line structure.) 1322 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1673 2732 32 (25) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2848 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2848 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2880 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 24 (25) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2908 548 ( This history is well documented in ) 548 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
923 2907 412 (The Ultimate Entrepreneur) 412 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1335 2908 10 (.) 10 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 22 22
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (22) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1665 (Like everything else in the computer industry, TNMS soon came to be known by its) 1665 SB
351 337 1765 (acronym.  The theme was simple and familiar:  Set up a structure such that line managers) 1765 SB
351 396 1759 (would be accountable for their actions.  Push budgeting and profit and loss responsibility) 1759 SB
351 455 1388 (as far down the organization and as close to the real work as possible.) 1388 SB
351 547 1628 (It was a worthy goal, but scandalously implemented as vice-presidents all over the) 1628 SB
351 606 1792 (company jockeyed for strategic advantage against one another.  The story from U.S. Sales) 1792 SB
351 665 679 (may have been the most shocking.) 679 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 782 216 (Stovepipes) 216 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 858 225 (A business ) 225 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
576 858 188 (stovepipe) 188 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
764 858 1328 ( is an organizational culture that prevents people in one segment of) 1328 SB
351 917 1763 (the business from interacting with people in another segment in a common-sense fashion.) 1763 SB
351 976 1640 (In a business stovepipe, communication travels vertically within a segment, but not) 1640 SB
351 1035 1773 (laterally.  The behavior is similar to a physical stovepipe above a fireplace - smoke travels) 1773 SB
351 1094 1656 (straight up through the stovepipe.  This is good in a fireplace, but bad in a business.) 1656 SB
351 1186 1688 (Business stovepipes create several problems.  Stovepipe cultures tend to create semi-) 1688 SB
351 1245 1579 (independent, vertically integrated divisions within the overall organization.  The) 1579 SB
351 1304 1657 (management of each of these divisions compete with each other for funds and other) 1657 SB
351 1363 1588 (organizational resources.  Ultimately the divisions become personal, self-serving) 1588 SB
351 1422 1794 ("fiefdoms".  Although each of the divisions depends on the other divisions to operate, they) 1794 SB
351 1481 1762 (tend to act in heir own immediate interest, often at the expense of other divisions and the) 1762 SB
351 1540 408 (overall organization.) 408 SB
351 1632 1679 (Unless somebody with overall responsibility intervenes, organizations with stovepipe) 1679 SB
351 1691 1788 (cultures eventually become choked with waste, duplication, and mistrust.  The market will) 1788 SB
351 1750 1789 (eventually find a more efficient supplier and the stovepipe organization must either change) 1789 SB
351 1809 128 (or die.) 128 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-BoldItalic /font26 ANSIFont font
351 1926 535 (Red Lines and Blue Lines) 535 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2002 1606 (To implement TNMS in the U.S., Bob Hughes, then vice-president of U.S. sales,) 1606 SB
351 2061 1731 (promised to eliminate bureaucracy and make Digital an easy company with which to do) 1731 SB
351 2120 1597 (business.  Bob and his team promised to change the Sales division from a strictly) 1597 SB
351 2179 1782 (hierarchical, centralized organization, to a new form of organization where field managers) 1782 SB
351 2238 941 (would finally be empowered to make decisions.) 941 SB
351 2330 1771 (Unfortunately, these grand promises turned into a disaster as they set up what may be the) 1771 SB
351 2389 1739 (most confusing organizational structure ever witnessed in business.  The system divided) 1739 SB
351 2448 1560 (Digital's U.S. marketplace into geographies, then crossed the geographies with) 1560 SB
351 2507 1800 (management structures to handle national and international customers.  The idea was, each) 1800 SB
351 2566 1748 (large account would have a single sales account manager with ultimate responsibility for) 1748 SB
351 2625 296 (profit and loss.) 296 SB
351 2717 1685 (Large customers who crossed geographical boundaries and spent lots of money were) 1685 SB
351 2776 128 (called ) 128 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
479 2776 193 (Red Line ) 193 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
672 2776 1401 (accounts.  Each red line account was assigned an overall manager who) 1401 SB
351 2835 1367 (had responsibility for profit and loss.  All other accounts were called ) 1367 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1718 2835 194 (Blue Line) 194 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1912 2835 201 ( accounts.) 201 SB
351 2894 1732 (These were managed as a portfolio by the existing field management team.  An account) 1732 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 23 23
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (23) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1744 (set manager would have ultimate responsibility for profit and loss for the assigned set of) 1744 SB
351 337 488 (accounts in the territory.) 488 SB
351 429 1583 (Although the system was designed to be organized around customers, it quickly) 1583 SB
351 488 1623 (degenerated into chaos.  Each red-line manager needed a sales force and technical) 1623 SB
351 547 1644 (support.  Blue line managers also needed a sales force and technical support.  Each) 1644 SB
351 606 1776 (manager drew up a budget for what they needed and where they needed them.  Then they) 1776 SB
351 665 1720 (essentially picked teams from the existing sales and technical support force.  Those not) 1720 SB
351 724 1698 (picked were laid off -- regardless of whether their skills were needed by the company.) 1698 SB
351 816 1770 (The new red line managers generally had no prior relationships with their new customers.) 1770 SB
351 875 1718 (And, although the new organization was designed to give ultimate responsibility to red) 1718 SB
351 934 1761 (line and blue line managers, nobody ever built information systems to tell these managers) 1761 SB
351 993 1771 (whether or not they were profitable.  This meant that managers in one part of the country) 1771 SB
351 1052 1667 (made strategic decisions about customers in another part of the country without any) 1667 SB
351 1111 1767 (knowledge of the history or relationship.  And, even worse, they had no quantitative data) 1767 SB
351 1170 1709 (to understand the basis or consequences of their decisions.  This meant that significant) 1709 SB
351 1229 1635 (decisions were often made with no qualitative or quantitative data.  In many cases,) 1635 SB
351 1288 899 (budgets were no better than random numbers) 899 SB
351 1380 1749 (The existing sales force in local offices across the U.S. knew their local customers down) 1749 SB
351 1439 1622 (the street, but were prohibited from calling on them.  Instead, the red line account) 1622 SB
351 1498 1720 (managers would fly people from out of town to call on local customers.  So a sales rep) 1720 SB
351 1557 1707 (from Denver would call on the Minneapolis branch of a company with headquarters in) 1707 SB
351 1616 1619 (Denver, while the sales rep from Minneapolis would call on the Texas branch of a) 1619 SB
351 1675 830 (company with headquarters in Minnesota.) 830 SB
351 1767 1734 (This lead to ridiculous situations, including at least one in Minneapolis.  Over the years,) 1734 SB
351 1826 1584 (the Minneapolis office built a productive relationship with a large company with) 1584 SB
351 1885 1778 (headquarters in Denver and significant operations in Minneapolis.  But, after red lines and) 1778 SB
351 1944 1776 (blue lines, people in the Minneapolis office were prohibited from calling on this customer.) 1776 SB
351 2003 1788 (Instead, the account manager flew in from Denver occasionally.  Results were predictable.) 1788 SB
351 2062 1713 (The customer complained, ongoing projects were delayed or canceled, and the flow of) 1713 SB
351 2121 809 (money from this customer slowed down.) 809 SB
351 2213 1799 (In several other cases, technical support people possessed skills needed to make significant) 1799 SB
351 2272 1719 (sales to red line customers.  But if the support people spent time with these customers,) 1719 SB
351 2331 1680 (they would have to charge that time internally to the red line business, which had not) 1680 SB
351 2390 1760 (budgeted for support time.  It was internal accounting gone nuts.  The predictable result:) 1760 SB
351 2449 1767 (Digital walked away from significant pieces of business because its internal structures did) 1767 SB
351 2508 953 (not allow it to apply talent where it was needed.) 953 SB
351 2600 1753 (The system forced sales managers to spend nearly all their time meeting or in conference) 1753 SB
351 2659 1707 (calls with eachother in marathon budgeting and planning exercises.  With all their time) 1707 SB
351 2718 1680 (booked for planning exercises, nobody had time to run the business.  Incredibly, they) 1680 SB
351 2777 1582 (sometimes turned down orders because they had not yet assigned sales reps and) 1582 SB
351 2836 813 (territories, and nobody knew what to do.) 813 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 24 24
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (24) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1764 (In at least one case in Colorado in 1991, a customer called his local office to order a new) 1764 SB
351 337 1794 ($100,000+ VAX.  The local office turned him away because it had not yet assigned a sales) 1794 SB
351 396 374 (rep to the account.) 374 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
725 390 32 (26) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 488 1699 (The situation ultimately degenerated into total chaos as the red line account managers) 1699 SB
351 547 1728 (quickly built their empires and the system grew increasingly corrupt.  Geographical line) 1728 SB
351 606 1735 (managers found themselves forced to layoff more and more people as spending budgets) 1735 SB
351 665 1266 (were squeezed harder and harder each quarter as sales dried up.) 1266 SB
351 757 1717 (The system took on a life of its own as the first wave of layoffs hit the U.S field in July) 1717 SB
351 816 1733 (1991.  Suddenly, it was no longer internal funny-money.  In New York, security guards) 1733 SB
351 875 1793 (met people at the door as they reported to work.  People on the \223good\224 list were let inside) 1793 SB
351 934 1589 (to work.  People on the \223bad\224 list were escorted to their desks to clean out their) 1589 SB
351 993 425 (belongings and leave.) 425 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
776 987 32 (27) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
808 993 1318 (  In most other cities, people were escorted to the Personnel office) 1318 SB
351 1052 1759 (throughout the day, told the news, then allowed to say good-bye and leave on their own.) 1759 SB
351 1111 1731 (More than 20 people were let go that day in Minneapolis.  To call that day stressful is a) 1731 SB
351 1170 1741 (gross understatement.  The next round occurred in October, 1991.  From that time until) 1741 SB
351 1229 1750 (mid 1994 and beyond, the constant threat of layoffs became just another fact of working) 1750 SB
351 1288 1497 (life at DEC as round after round swept various groups across the company.) 1497 SB
351 1380 1786 (Red lines and blue lines could have worked had the system been implemented with at least) 1786 SB
351 1439 1677 (some semblance of cooperation.  Instead, it degenerated into competing empires and) 1677 SB
351 1498 1730 (political maneuvering.  The process failed and thousands of good people lost their jobs.) 1730 SB
351 1590 1745 (Bob Hughes eventually left DEC, \223to pursue other interests\224, and the infamous red lines) 1745 SB
351 1649 526 (and blue lines died quietly.) 526 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 1766 892 (Round 2 -- Customer Business Units) 892 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1852 1642 (Bob Palmer took over as the new CEO in the summer of 1992 and reorganized the) 1642 SB
351 1911 1764 (company again.  This time, instead of dividing the company by geography, he divided the) 1764 SB
351 1970 1772 (company into 9 business units.  Four of these were product divisions, such as storage and) 1772 SB
351 2029 1754 (personal computers.  Five were market segments, such as medical, defense, government,) 1754 SB
351 2088 220 (and others.) 220 SB
351 2180 1664 (The idea was to organize the company around customer issues, rather than arbitrary) 1664 SB
351 2239 1763 (geographic boundaries, so each Customer Business Unit \(CBU\) concentrated on a group) 1763 SB
351 2298 1743 (of industries world wide.  Their job was to penetrate their assigned markets with Digital) 1743 SB
351 2357 1374 (products and services and provide a favorable return to the company.) 1374 SB
351 2449 1596 (The 5 CBU vice-presidents were given free reign over their markets.  They were) 1596 SB
351 2508 1752 (empowered to make important decisions because they would be closest to the customer.) 1752 SB
351 2567 1583 (Unfortunately, the results were disastrous.  After 9 months of planning, the new) 1583 SB
351 2626 1726 (organization went into effect in July 1993.  By the end of the quarter, September 1993,) 1726 SB
351 2685 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2685 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2717 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2739 24 (26) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2745 1661 ( Scott Fischer was the MIS director at Laser Magnetic Optical in Colorado and a former DEC employee from) 1661 SB
390 2791 1371 (Minnesota.  He told me this story at a Minneapolis DEC user group meeting in fall, 1991.) 1371 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2856 24 (27) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2862 1753 ( People who were there documented their experiences in electronic employee forums.  I also heard the story in face) 1753 SB
390 2908 733 (to face discussions with friends who were there.) 733 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 25 25
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (25) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1700 (Digital's revenues dropped 10 percent and the company lost another $83 million.  The) 1700 SB
351 337 1318 (December 1993 and March 1994 quarters were equally disastrous.) 1318 SB
351 429 1630 (Almost immediately after the CBU vice-presidents started on the job, a blizzard of) 1630 SB
351 488 1714 (announcements hit the electronic mail network about country-level vice presidents and) 1714 SB
351 547 1702 (regional level vice-presidents  The new CBU vice-presidents each independently hired) 1702 SB
351 606 1717 (their own layer of geography based vice-presidents.  Now, instead of one geographical) 1717 SB
351 665 1746 (structure, the company ended up with 5 separate geographical organizations, along with) 1746 SB
351 724 1694 (the original geographic organizations, each fighting for talent, customers, money, and) 1694 SB
351 783 170 (prestige.) 170 SB
351 875 851 (So much for getting close to the customer!) 851 SB
351 967 1716 (The story gets worse.  After 9 months of planning, the senior management team finally) 1716 SB
351 1026 1699 (notified individual employees in the field of the new CBU organizations to which they) 1699 SB
351 1085 1676 (were assigned.  Everyone received an electronic mail message and 24 hours to either) 1676 SB
351 1144 1737 (accept the new assignment or be essentially terminated.  Nobody in authority seemed to) 1737 SB
351 1203 1761 (give much thought to the effect on employee morale or customer confidence as the word) 1761 SB
351 1262 158 (got out.) 158 SB
351 1354 1719 (And the truly bizarre:  By most estimates, $11 billion of Digital's $14 billion in revenue) 1719 SB
351 1413 1693 (depend on VMS.  This operating system runs the computer operations at many of the) 1693 SB
351 1472 1681 (most important companies in the world.  It would be really bad if a company told the) 1681 SB
351 1531 848 (world it is abandoning its flagship product.) 848 SB
351 1623 1749 (Yet some CBU vice-presidents, in essence, did exactly that.  They went out of their way) 1749 SB
351 1682 1731 (to tell the press Digital does not plan to go after new markets with VMS.  Instead, they) 1731 SB
351 1741 1584 (told the press Digital expects its future growth to come from its UNIX offering.) 1584 SB
351 1800 1676 (Predictably, customers interpreted this statement and other signals to mean Digital is) 1676 SB
351 1859 1746 (abandoning VMS.  This shook the confidence of many of Digital's most important VMS) 1746 SB
351 1918 1782 (customers, who had bet millions of dollars and years of staff training on VMS.  Many left;) 1782 SB
351 1977 762 (many are strongly considering leaving.) 762 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1113 1971 32 (28) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2069 1640 (DEC may never know how many customers they lost and continue to lose to other) 1640 SB
351 2128 1667 (vendors.  Despite repeated warnings and pleas from employees across the electronic) 1667 SB
351 2187 1700 (network, nobody seemed to think about the consequences of alienating the company's) 1700 SB
351 2246 726 (employees and entire customer base.) 726 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 2363 789 (Round 3 -- Back to Geographies) 789 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2449 1697 (In the late fall, 1993, Willow Shire, medical CBU vice-president, left \223to pursue other) 1697 SB
351 2508 1775 (interests\224.  Palmer quietly put Lucente in charge of all CBUs.  The business unit structure) 1775 SB
351 2618 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2618 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2650 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2672 24 (28) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2678 1682 ( I talk to many people in the DEC installed base in my consulting business.  Most now doubt DEC\222s long term) 1682 SB
390 2724 1700 (viability and commitment.  Also see the recent trade press article, \223Good, bad news for StorageWorks, HSJ40\224,) 1700 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
390 2769 383 (Digital News and Review) 383 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
773 2770 1370 (, May 9, 1994, page 23.  The article describes a survey of DEC\222s installed base customers) 1370 SB
390 2816 1745 (by Reliability Ratings about disk storage upgrade plans.  Very few members of DEC\222s installed base have plans to) 1745 SB
390 2862 1726 (buy these upgrades.  The article suggests the lack of interest is directly related to decreasing interest in the VAX.) 1726 SB
390 2908 999 (The survey results are consistent with my first hand observations.) 999 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 26 26
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (26) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1797 (started to crumble.  The rumors flew about more field reorganizations, but nobody seemed) 1797 SB
351 337 520 (to have any solid answers.) 520 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
351 454 710 (Round 3 1/2 -- Lucente is Fir) 709 SB
1060 454 58 (ed) 58 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 540 1703 (After the March 1994 quarter, DEC\222s board of directors fired Lucente and put Enrico) 1703 SB
351 599 1733 (Pesatori in charge of sales and marketing.  Nobody really knows what will happen from) 1733 SB
351 658 198 (this point.) 198 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 27 27
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (27) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1418 (Apparent Company Operating) 1418 SB
351 397 604 (Conventions) 604 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 572 394 (Field Sales) 394 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 684 1753 (Contrary to the lofty statements about \223empowerment\224 and \223quality\224, sales management) 1753 SB
351 743 1783 (inside Digital is strictly top-down and hiearchical.  Budgets, quotas, and goals are decided) 1783 SB
351 802 1776 (from above after endless exercises.  Most people in DEC sales become cynical after a few) 1776 SB
351 861 1618 (years of constant reassignment and incentives that have little to do with the work.) 1618 SB
351 953 1800 (The press and analysts all argue that DEC should emphasize indirect sales channels such as) 1800 SB
351 1012 1699 (distributors and retailers.  DEC managers talked about this for years, but nobody ever) 1699 SB
351 1071 1661 (took concrete action to make it happen.  The average DEC sales rep on the street is) 1661 SB
351 1130 1755 (simply not conditioned to thrive in the economy of 1994.  Most end user DEC sales reps) 1755 SB
351 1189 1737 (still get more credit for direct sales than indirect sales.  One large system sale puts more) 1737 SB
351 1248 1727 (money in their pockets than several PCs.  Because of these incentives, many DEC sales) 1727 SB
351 1307 1718 (reps still operate under a model that emphasizes high-priced, low volume products in a) 1718 SB
351 1366 622 (low priced, high volume world.) 622 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1491 644 (Digital Consulting) 644 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1603 1722 (Digital Consulting is an industry laughingstock.  This group was staffed with dedicated) 1722 SB
351 1662 1755 (and capable people at the bottom, but filled with arrogance and incompetence at the top.) 1755 SB
351 1721 1733 (In one noteworthy case, it took two vice-presidents of Digital Consulting to draft a one) 1733 SB
351 1780 1588 (page letter to the field explaining that the company would soon be consolidating) 1588 SB
351 1839 1744 (operations.  When asked why, a member of their staff replied the tremendous amount of) 1744 SB
351 1898 643 (work required 2 vice-presidents.) 643 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
994 1892 32 (29) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1990 1693 (The system pits managers against eachother in a constant guerrilla war over who gets) 1693 SB
351 2049 1737 (credit for orders.  So management forces technical experts in the field to manually enter) 1737 SB
351 2108 1626 (different, and sometimes contradictory, budget and forecast numbers into multiple) 1626 SB
351 2167 1686 (systems.  Instead of dealing with the real world, managers then make layoff decisions) 1686 SB
351 2226 1736 (based on these numbers.  The only metric that really counts is billable hours.  Quality of) 1736 SB
351 2285 1735 (solutions and customer satisfaction are far down on the list.  The system provides every) 1735 SB
351 2344 1235 (incentive to cook the books and no incentive for quality work.) 1235 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 2469 640 (Customer Service) 640 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2581 1751 (The Customer Service group is the most efficient field group in the company.  These are) 1751 SB
351 2640 1693 (the people truly on the front lines, every day, troubleshooting customer hardware and) 1693 SB
351 2699 1764 (software problems and maintaining customer relationships.  The managers I have met are) 1764 SB
351 2848 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2848 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2880 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 24 (29) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2908 879 ( It happened in 1991.  I was there and asked the question.) 879 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 28 28
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (28) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1632 (all top-notch, they all know their business, and they are all committed to operating) 1632 SB
351 337 495 (efficiently and profitably.) 495 SB
351 429 1780 (Customer Service will need every bit of that efficiency as the market continues to squeeze) 1780 SB
351 488 1736 (revenue and profit margins.  With cheap, commodity hardware and 3-5 year warranties,) 1736 SB
351 547 1770 (lucrative hardware maintenance contracts will soon be a distant memory.  In fact, Service) 1770 SB
351 606 1730 (Revenues were down 11 percent in Q3 FY 1994.  Since Digital combines revenue from) 1730 SB
351 665 1764 (Consulting and Customer Service operations in this single income statement line, it is not) 1764 SB
351 724 1709 (possible to tell which business took the brunt of this decline.  But it is well known that) 1709 SB
351 783 1762 (other companies such as Bell Atlantic routinely try to underbid DEC service and they are) 1762 SB
351 842 531 (making significant inroads.) 531 SB
351 934 1762 (Although traditionally a hardware maintenance group, Customer Service is working hard) 1762 SB
351 993 1657 (to build its software expertise.  It will run into trouble as it competes internally with) 1657 SB
351 1052 1672 (Digital Consulting to deliver system management and troubleshooting expertise on a) 1672 SB
351 1111 326 (consulting basis.) 326 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1236 280 (Storage) 280 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1348 1617 (In mid 1994, storage is one of DEC\222s few bright spots.  This group is becoming a) 1617 SB
351 1407 1740 (competitive powerhouse and building an excellent reputation as a technology leader.  In) 1740 SB
351 1466 1716 (1991, Charlie Christ, vice-president of the storage group, made a tough and unpopular) 1716 SB
351 1525 1726 (decision to abandon large, proprietary disks and concentrate on smaller, more open 3.5) 1726 SB
351 1584 1668 (inch disks and standardized enclosures.  Unlike other parts of DEC, they recognized) 1668 SB
351 1643 1692 (where the market was going and got in front to help lead the charge.  In 1990, DEC's) 1692 SB
351 1702 1704 (storage products were the most expensive and slowest performing in the industry.  By) 1704 SB
351 1761 1768 (1994, DEC storage is competitive with everyone on price, equal or better in performance) 1768 SB
351 1820 1711 (and reliability, and constantly improving.  Charlie Christ led the storage group from an) 1711 SB
351 1879 932 (industry laughingstock to leadership in 2 years.) 932 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 2004 146 (PCs) 146 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2116 1677 (By 1994, the PC business is another DEC success story.  It was not always this way.) 1677 SB
351 2208 1768 (People still tell stories about the 1983 PRO 350, Rainbow, and DECmate II flops.  These) 1768 SB
351 2267 1672 (systems were technically excellent, years ahead of their time, and offered capabilities) 1672 SB
351 2326 1748 (nobody could match.  Unfortunately, DEC failed to recruit application software vendors) 1748 SB
351 2385 766 (and bungled its attempts at retail sales.) 766 SB
351 2477 1784 (In 1990, DEC's PC business was a laughingstock.  DEC finally made a deal with Tandy to) 1784 SB
351 2536 1759 (resell their PCs and sold them at roughly double the market price.  This further enhanced) 1759 SB
351 2595 793 (their reputation as a high cost producer.) 793 SB
351 2687 1689 (In 1991, DEC started up a telephone and mail order PC business, modeled after Dell.) 1689 SB
351 2746 1605 (This grew from nothing in 1991 to become one of the major PC players by 1994.) 1605 SB
351 2805 1732 (Although he did not start up this operation, Enrico Pesatori is generally given credit for) 1732 SB
351 2864 411 (making it successful.) 411 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 29 29
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (29) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1631 (As a consumer, the PC division is pleasant to deal with.  They offer good value on) 1631 SB
351 337 1682 (complete systems, but are nowhere near competitive on components and peripherals.) 1682 SB
351 396 1659 (However, they believe retailers are better able to sell components and peripherals at) 1659 SB
351 455 1760 (competitive prices.  For DEC, warehousing and inventory costs are too high.  Therefore,) 1760 SB
351 514 1738 (they made a conscious decision to concentrate on complete systems.  They intentionally) 1738 SB
351 573 1418 (keep prices high on components and peripherals to keep demand down.) 1418 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1769 567 32 (30) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 665 1671 (They offer a responsive telephone sales staff, 3 year warranty, and reasonably priced) 1671 SB
351 724 540 (telephone support services.) 540 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 849 1780 (Hardware System Engineering and Manufacturing) 1780 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 961 1701 (DEC has a long reputation for excellence in hardware engineering and manufacturing.) 1701 SB
351 1020 1554 (The reputation continues with the introduction of new alpha system platforms.) 1554 SB
351 1112 1656 (The forecasting system is a joke.  It has been broken since at least 1979, when poor) 1656 SB
351 1171 1723 (forecasts of the then new DEC VT100 terminal pushed lead times out beyond one year) 1723 SB
351 1230 1742 (and spawned an entire clone terminal industry.  Nobody ever wanted to spend money to) 1742 SB
351 1289 1716 (fix the forecasting system, yet its shortcomings cost DEC dearly again and again.  This) 1716 SB
351 1348 1722 (was common knowledge at the grass roots level inside DEC for years and nobody ever) 1722 SB
351 1407 1792 (figured out why management failed repeatedly to address the issue. By mid 1994, even the) 1792 SB
351 1466 803 (popular press knows about its problems:) 803 SB
426 1558 1438 (The next move: better systems.  Insiders say one of the reasons Palmer\222s) 1438 SB
426 1617 1505 (reorganization -- built around customer-oriented business units -- failed was) 1505 SB
426 1676 1703 (inadequate sales-forecasting and manufacturing -planning systems.  Designed for low-) 1703 SB
426 1735 1693 (volume, high-margin products, they could not cope with the rapid shift to commodity) 1693 SB
426 1794 1551 (products such as PCs and disk drives.  One DEC sales manager says the sales-) 1551 SB
426 1853 1671 (forecasting systems have no link to DEC\222s manufacturing-planning systems -- so the) 1671 SB
426 1912 1673 (two are manually reconciled.  Indeed, Lucente predicted as recently as February that) 1673 SB
426 1971 1613 (Alpha sales were going to double in the March quarter.  Instead, Alpha sales rose) 1613 SB
426 2030 1695 (66%.  Admits a spokesman: \221There\222s some internal work that needs to be done for us) 1695 SB
426 2089 582 (to become more predictable.\222) 582 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1008 2083 32 (31) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2181 1788 (The forecast system is still hurting DEC.  DEC recently announced a brilliantly engineered) 1788 SB
351 2240 1748 (new alpha based system, the DEC 2100.  Most people at the grass roots believe demand) 1748 SB
351 2299 1775 (will skyrocket for this product.  Yet, according to a presentation from DEC to Minnesota) 1775 SB
351 2358 1756 (DEC distributors in April, 1994, manufacturing is only planning to build 1200 systems in) 1756 SB
351 2417 1794 (the June quarter.  If demand is anything near expected, product shortages and lost revenue) 1794 SB
351 2476 319 (will be rampant.) 319 SB
351 2568 1796 (DEC is pouring roughly $500 million into a new chip plant in Hudson, Mass.  This state of) 1796 SB
351 2627 1793 (the art facility is scheduled to come online in 1995.  If DEC survives that long, it will build) 1793 SB
351 2777 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2777 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2809 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2831 24 (30) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2837 1180 (Conversations with Cindy Perkins, DEC PC telesales rep \(1-800-PCBYDEC\)) 1180 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2902 24 (31) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2908 442 ( \223Desperate Hours at DEC\224, ) 442 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
817 2907 222 (Business Week) 222 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1039 2908 362 (, May 9, 1994, page 28.) 362 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 30 30
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (30) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1746 (subsequent versions of its Alpha chips here.  These future chips promise additional CPU) 1746 SB
351 337 1409 (performance gains of 10 to 100 times over those available in mid 1994.) 1409 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 462 773 (Software Engineering) 773 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 574 1727 (DEC software engineering was once widely respected in the industry.  They are rapidly) 1727 SB
351 633 1763 (losing their credibility.  They have lots of good ideas, but never seem to implement them,) 1763 SB
351 692 1775 (and the world will no longer wait for this group to get its act together.  They have started) 1775 SB
351 751 1103 (and abandoned more ideas than most companies invent.) 1103 SB
351 843 1568 (As recently as 1989, DEC offered unprecedented excellence in middleware and) 1568 SB
351 902 1769 (communication software.  The operating motto at the time:  "Build the best, integrate the) 1769 SB
351 961 1698 (rest."  Unfortunately, DEC still offers roughly the same capabilities it offered in 1989.) 1698 SB
351 1020 1643 (The rest of the industry passed DEC by as the engineering managers jockeyed with) 1643 SB
351 1079 639 (eachother in endless turf battles.) 639 SB
351 1171 1718 (In 1990, David Stone was promoted to vice-president of layered software engineering.) 1718 SB
351 1230 1704 (Stone was a visionary who preached the gospel of the \223Information Utility\224 to anyone) 1704 SB
351 1289 1559 (who would listen.  He was one of the forces behind the scenes, long before the) 1559 SB
351 1348 1049 (\223Information Highway\224 made it to the popular press.) 1049 SB
351 1440 1750 (Stone believed that software products would soon become low margin commodities and) 1750 SB
351 1499 1659 (would sit on retail shelves next to PCs.  He further believed that DEC\222s engineering) 1659 SB
351 1558 1641 (methodology was antiquated and would not be ready for the new paradigm.  So he) 1641 SB
351 1617 1774 (attempted to reorganize several disparate and competing groups into \223The New Software) 1774 SB
351 1676 342 (Group\224 \(TNSG\).) 342 SB
351 1768 1325 (Evidently, Stone was more of a visionary than a practical manager.) 1325 SB
351 1860 1724 (By February, 1992, one manager from TNSG admitted in public it took them 6 months) 1724 SB
351 1919 1786 (just to figure out roles and responsibilities.  During this period, much of the ongoing work) 1786 SB
351 1978 503 (stopped or slowed down.) 503 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
854 1972 32 (32) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2070 1744 (Stone left later in 1992 and went to AT&T.  He was replaced by Dennis Roberson, who) 1744 SB
351 2129 1756 (appeared to be in way over his head.  In public appearances in 1992 and 1993, Roberson) 1756 SB
351 2188 1789 (was unable to give coherent answers to questions and seemed to provide little guidance or) 1789 SB
351 2247 411 (leadership to TNSG.) 411 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
762 2241 32 (33) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2339 1757 (Through 1992 and 1993, rumors flew across the electronic grapevine about the future of) 1757 SB
351 2398 1723 (key application software products.  With their futures uncertain, many of us in the field) 1723 SB
351 2457 1790 (shied away from promoting them.  Meanwhile, engineering budgets were squeezed further) 1790 SB
351 2516 1060 (and further as the rest of the company went downhill.) 1060 SB
351 2639 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2639 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2671 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2693 24 (32) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2699 1718 ( This took place at an internal seminar, \223IMSYM\224 \(Information Management SYMposium\) in Colorado Springs,) 1718 SB
390 2745 1743 (February, 1992.  The highlight of that seminar was a bus trip to Cripple Creek, Colorado, where I gambled away a) 1743 SB
390 2791 1430 (50 cent roll of pennies in the slot machines in one of the newly renovated main-street casinos.) 1430 SB
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2856 24 (33) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2862 1677 ( I remember Roberson in at least 2 appearances.  The first was a company wide closed circuit TV broadcast in) 1677 SB
390 2908 1464 (December, 1992.  The second was a live appearance in front of the VMS Partners in July, 1993.) 1464 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 31 31
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (31) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1179 (The casualties were heartbreaking and the stories shocking:) 1179 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 368 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 373 1449 (DECwrite, introduced in 1989, was a great WYSIWYG word processor.) 1449 SB
501 432 1628 (DECwrite version 2, delivered in 1991, was full of bugs and had a nearly unusable) 1628 SB
501 491 1229 (user interface.  From there, it failed to keep up with the times.) 1229 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 581 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 586 1614 (DECpresent was a slide presentation package.  It hit the market in the 1990/1991) 1614 SB
501 645 406 (time frame and died.) 406 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 735 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 740 1529 (DECdecision was a spreadsheet package with the capability to mix data from) 1529 SB
501 799 1605 (applications all over the computing world.  It hit the market in 1989 or 1990, but) 1605 SB
501 858 1146 (was never enthusiastically promoted and never caught on.) 1146 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 948 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 953 1527 (CDA \(Compound Document Architecture\) was a revolutionary innovation in) 1527 SB
501 1012 1566 (1988.  It offered \223live-link\224 capability, which meant a user of a CDA compliant) 1566 SB
501 1071 1604 (application such as DECwrite could mix images, sound, video, and graphics with) 1604 SB
501 1130 1639 (an electronic document.  DEC introduced the beginnings of this capability in 1988,) 1639 SB
501 1189 1502 (improved it somewhat in the 1990 timeframe, then let it drop.  In mid 1994,) 1502 SB
501 1248 1646 (Microsoft now delivers similar capability to millions of customers in its Office suite) 1646 SB
501 1307 1022 (of products.  DEC is not even a footnote in history.) 1022 SB
351 1399 1771 (The operating system groups were not much better, as UNIX and VMS changed strategy) 1771 SB
351 1458 563 (and direction multiple times.) 563 SB
351 1550 1655 (Although nobody would admit it in public, ULTRIX was widely recognized as junk) 1655 SB
351 1609 1709 (because it lacked key capabilities needed by third party applications.  DEC invested its) 1709 SB
351 1668 1404 (money on OSF/1, based on work from the Open Software Foundation.) 1404 SB
351 1760 1748 (With the rebirth of Alpha, a new conflict erupted:  What should DEC offer to follow the) 1748 SB
351 1819 1765 (current Mips based line of RISC workstations?  Should it put OSF/1 on Alpha, or should) 1765 SB
351 1878 1640 (it leave Alpha for the VMS installed base and bet on Mips for its UNIX capability?) 1640 SB
351 1970 1751 (The debates were endless and vice-presidents changed their minds constantly on what to) 1751 SB
351 2029 1689 (do.  OSF/1 on Alpha was on again, off again for months.  This wreaked havoc on the) 1689 SB
351 2088 1631 (engineering teams, which were forced to operate with no guidance from anyone in) 1631 SB
351 2147 192 (authority.) 192 SB
351 2239 1771 (Finally, it was decided to put OSF/1 on Alpha and publicly commit to OSF/1 on the Mips) 1771 SB
351 2298 572 (based DECstation platforms.) 572 SB
351 2390 1768 (Then the commitment to Mips started to waver as SGI bought Mips and the Mips R4000) 1768 SB
351 2449 1793 (chips became scarce.  DEC\222s wavering commitment to Mips based workstations infuriated) 1793 SB
351 2508 1637 (loyal DEC customers who bought them based on DEC promises they had a future.) 1637 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1988 2502 32 (34) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2664 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2664 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2696 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2718 24 (34) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2724 1703 ( One of these situations occurred at Mayo Clinic in 1992.  The Minneapolis UNIX specialist and I delivered the) 1703 SB
390 2770 1739 (presentations to them about DEC\222s future plans and Mayo made major commitments based on what we told them.) 1739 SB
390 2816 1664 (When the plans changed a few weeks later, I was given the dubious honor of explaining the new plans.  DEC) 1664 SB
390 2862 1628 (eventually lost much of Mayo\222s workstation business to HP, as application software vendors canceled their) 1628 SB
390 2908 278 (DECstation plans.) 278 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Symbol
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 32 32
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (32) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1689 (Sometime in 1992, Alpha became the clear priority for OSF/1.  DEC finally delivered) 1689 SB
351 337 1739 (OSF/1 in March 1993, to yawns in the marketplace.  They never did deliver OSF/1 on a) 1739 SB
351 396 1359 (Mips DECstation platform and the Mips platform died a quiet death.) 1359 SB
351 488 1710 (According to sources, the UNIX engineers are still groping for leadership and have no) 1710 SB
351 547 1785 (idea on what their strategic direction should be.  Without goals, they just drift.  Morale on) 1785 SB
351 606 1752 (the VMS side is also low as projects are canceled and more and more good people leave) 1752 SB
351 665 376 (for better pastures.) 376 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
727 659 32 (35) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 757 1776 (By mid 1994, Microsoft, Lotus, and other PC software companies have long since passed) 1776 SB
351 816 1647 (DEC in the marketplace.  Some of their development teams are led by former DEC) 1647 SB
351 875 1704 (software engineers.  Meanwhile, the once proud DEC software engineering group is a) 1704 SB
351 934 192 (shambles.) 192 SB
351 2802 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2802 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2834 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2856 24 (35) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2862 1723 (For example, Brian Breton, long time product manager, liason to user groups, and defender of VMS in electronic) 1723 SB
390 2908 1132 (discussion forums and user groups, left in March to join another company.) 1132 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 33 33
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (33) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1518 (Analysis of the Company's Cost) 1518 SB
351 397 395 (Position) 395 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 539 1782 (DEC\222s revenue per employee has steadily improved over the years.  By April 1993, it was) 1782 SB
351 598 1679 (roughly $153,00.  Revenue per employee for IBM is $265,000.  In order for DEC to) 1679 SB
351 657 1794 (match IBM in revenue per employee, it must slash 40,000 from the payroll of 92,000.  See) 1794 SB
351 716 1073 (the appendix for a trend line of revenue per employee.) 1073 SB
351 808 1745 (At 31 percent of revenues at the end of FY 1993, SG&A expenses are way too high.  In) 1745 SB
351 867 1709 (the early 1980s, SG&A was less then 20 percent of revenues.  SG&A climbed steadily) 1709 SB
351 926 1694 (through the 1980s to 31 percent in 1990, 32 percent in 1991, and 34 percent in 1992.) 1694 SB
351 985 1795 (However, these figures are deceiving because the SG&A figures for 1990, 1991, and 1992) 1795 SB
351 1044 1755 (included special restructuring charges.  Something happened in FY 1993 to drive SG&A) 1755 SB
351 1103 1529 (expenses up.  The publicly available data gives no hint on what that could be.) 1529 SB
351 1195 1637 (For the first 9 months of FY 1994, the figure was 28.71 percent, a step in the right) 1637 SB
351 1254 188 (direction.) 188 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
920 5 344 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1265 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
172 5 1271 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1444 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1450 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1622 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1628 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1800 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1806 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1978 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1984 1344 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 146 1265 1350 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica-Oblique /font11 ANSIFont font
gs 176 55 1268 1344 CB
1277 1351 158 (FY 1990) 158 SB
gr
gs 178 55 1444 1344 CB
1455 1351 158 (FY 1991) 158 SB
gr
gs 178 55 1622 1344 CB
1633 1351 158 (FY 1992) 158 SB
gr
gs 178 55 1800 1344 CB
1811 1351 158 (FY 1993) 158 SB
gr
gs 178 55 1978 1344 CB
2056 1351 23 (9) 23 SB
gr
gs 178 55 1978 1393 CB
1999 1400 137 (months) 137 SB
gr
gs 178 55 1978 1442 CB
2022 1449 92 (1994) 92 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
920 2 344 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1265 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
175 2 1268 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1444 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
174 2 1447 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1622 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
174 2 1625 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1800 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
174 2 1803 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1978 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
174 2 1981 1497 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 47 1265 1500 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 920 51 345 1497 CB
351 1501 342 (SG&A Percentage) 342 SB
gr
gs 176 51 1268 1497 CB
1298 1501 141 (30.68%) 141 SB
gr
gs 178 51 1444 1497 CB
1476 1501 141 (32.14%) 141 SB
gr
gs 178 51 1622 1497 CB
1654 1501 141 (33.60%) 141 SB
gr
gs 178 51 1800 1497 CB
1832 1501 141 (30.94%) 141 SB
gr
gs 178 51 1978 1497 CB
2010 1501 141 (28.71%) 141 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
920 5 344 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 95 1265 1548 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1265 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
172 5 1271 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1444 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1450 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1622 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1628 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1800 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1806 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1978 1644 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
171 5 1984 1644 B
1 F
n
gs 920 48 345 1548 CB
351 1549 872 (SG&A Percentage without special restructuring) 872 SB
gr
gs 920 48 345 1596 CB
351 1597 127 (charge) 127 SB
gr
gs 176 48 1268 1548 CB
1298 1549 141 (26.43%) 141 SB
gr
gs 178 48 1444 1548 CB
1476 1549 141 (24.23%) 141 SB
gr
gs 178 48 1622 1548 CB
1654 1549 141 (22.83%) 141 SB
gr
gs 178 48 1800 1548 CB
1903 1549 70 (N/A) 70 SB
gr
gs 178 48 1978 1548 CB
2081 1549 70 (N/A) 70 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1744 1755 (Inventory turns steadily increased through the 1980s, from a low of 2.0 in 1982 to 5.1 in) 1755 SB
351 1803 1675 (1993.  At first glance, this seems like good news.  However, as the economics of the) 1675 SB
351 1862 1711 (computer industry change from low volume, high profit hardware to high volume, low) 1711 SB
351 1921 742 (margin commodities, inventory turns ) 742 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1093 1921 133 (should) 133 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1226 1921 443 ( increase substantially.) 443 SB
351 2013 1692 (Accounts Receivable Days Sales Outstanding also improved from 83 in 1992 to 69 in) 1692 SB
351 2072 1703 (1993.  This is the best performance of all the time for which financial data is available.) 1703 SB
351 2131 1335 (The number jumped back to 81 days for the first 9 months of 1994.) 1335 SB
351 2223 1688 (Much of Digital\222s cost comes from the relative increase in cost of product sales.  The) 1688 SB
351 2282 1630 (following table vividly illustrates the sinking profit margins on product sales as the) 1630 SB
351 2341 1730 (industry moves towards high-volume, low-margin products.  For comparison, note that) 1730 SB
351 2400 1399 (service expense percentages remained steady through the same period.) 1399 SB
/fm 256 def
1030 5 344 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1375 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
189 5 1381 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1571 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
188 5 1577 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1766 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
188 5 1772 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1961 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
188 5 1967 2490 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 91 1375 2496 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
gs 193 98 1378 2490 CB
1384 2498 170 (FY 1993) 170 SB
gr
gs 195 98 1571 2490 CB
1579 2498 170 (FY 1992) 170 SB
gr
gs 195 98 1766 2490 CB
1774 2498 170 (FY 1991) 170 SB
gr
gs 195 98 1961 2490 CB
1969 2498 170 (FY 1990) 170 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
1030 2 344 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1375 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
192 2 1378 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1571 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
191 2 1574 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1766 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
191 2 1769 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1961 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
191 2 1964 2588 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 150 1375 2591 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
gs 1030 62 345 2588 CB
351 2593 974 (Cost of Product Sales as a percentage of product) 974 SB
gr
gs 1030 95 345 2647 CB
351 2652 94 (sales) 94 SB
gr
gs 193 95 1378 2588 CB
1384 2593 155 (58.83%) 155 SB
gr
gs 195 95 1571 2588 CB
1579 2593 155 (55.20%) 155 SB
gr
gs 195 95 1766 2588 CB
1774 2593 155 (47.05%) 155 SB
gr
gs 195 95 1961 2588 CB
1969 2593 155 (46.97%) 155 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
1030 5 344 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 91 1375 2742 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1375 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
189 5 1381 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1571 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
188 5 1577 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1766 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
188 5 1772 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
5 5 1961 2834 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
188 5 1967 2834 B
1 F
n
gs 1030 92 345 2742 CB
351 2744 975 (Service Expense as a percentage of Service Sales) 975 SB
gr
gs 193 92 1378 2742 CB
1384 2744 155 (61.43%) 155 SB
gr
gs 195 92 1571 2742 CB
1579 2744 155 (62.29%) 155 SB
gr
gs 195 92 1766 2742 CB
1774 2744 155 (60.10%) 155 SB
gr
gs 195 92 1961 2742 CB
1969 2744 155 (61.89%) 155 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-Oblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 34 34
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (34) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1268 (Analysis of the Company's) 1268 SB
351 397 678 (Differentiation) 678 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 539 1762 (By mid 1994, Digital has two major differentiating factors left; clustering technology and) 1762 SB
351 598 1617 (Alpha.  DEC\222s modular storage enclosures are also innovative and unique.  In the) 1617 SB
351 657 1771 (commodity markets, DEC PCs, disk drives, terminals, and printers are generally the same) 1771 SB
351 716 558 (as everyone else\222s offerings.) 558 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 841 372 (Clustering) 372 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 953 1712 (Clustering is the ability to connect several computer systems into a single management) 1712 SB
351 1012 1765 (domain, such that users see a single system instead of disparate systems.  The technology) 1765 SB
351 1071 1778 (offers several advantages to users and system managers.  For example, if one system fails,) 1778 SB
351 1130 1630 (another system in the cluster can take over the failed system\222s processing load and) 1630 SB
351 1189 1742 (continue.  Dataquest recently evaluated cluster offerings from several vendors and rated) 1742 SB
351 1248 414 (VMSclusters on top.) 414 SB
351 1340 1651 (VMS is still widely recognized as an excellent operating system.  It is known for its) 1651 SB
351 1399 1799 (stability and robustness in critical, high availability environments.  VMS first hit the market) 1799 SB
351 1458 1736 (in 1978 and introduced clustering to the world in 1984.  Ten years later, it still provides) 1736 SB
351 1517 1594 (clustering and high availability computing capabilities unmatched in the industry.) 1594 SB
351 1609 1773 (Marketing is worse than poor as DEC allowed the competition to paint VMS as a legacy,) 1773 SB
351 1668 1739 (old, proprietary product with limited future life.  Instead of continuing innovation, DEC) 1739 SB
351 1727 1780 (allowed a massive self-fulfilling prophesy to damage its reputation possibly beyond repair.) 1780 SB
351 1786 1686 (VMS may well fade from memory as other vendors catch up and pass its capabilities.) 1686 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1911 209 (Alpha) 209 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2023 1780 (This technology still has the potential to rule the world.  It is still the only pure 64 bit chip) 1780 SB
351 2082 1769 (available.  64 bit capability is fast becoming important as users deal with larger and larger) 1769 SB
351 2141 1761 (databases and programs.  The difference between traditional 32 bit systems and 64 bits is) 1761 SB
351 2200 186 (dramatic:) 186 SB
351 2292 1727 (With 32 bits, it is theoretically possible to map the contents of a typical 1994 disk drive) 1727 SB
351 2351 1665 (into a computer\222s main memory.  With 64 bits, it is theoretically possible to map the) 1665 SB
351 2410 1677 (contents of every disk drive ever built since the dawn of time into a computer\222s main) 1677 SB
351 2469 175 (memory.) 175 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
526 2463 32 (36) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2664 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2664 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2696 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2718 24 (36) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2724 1770 ( A 32 bit word allows a computer to map 2^32 addresses, or roughly 4 GB \(4 billion characters\).  In mid 1994, most) 1770 SB
390 2770 1665 (modern disk drives hold roughly 2 GB of data.  A 64 bit word allows a computer to map 2^64 addresses, or 4) 1665 SB
390 2816 1702 (billion sets of 4 billion characters each.  Assuming a disk no bigger than 4 billion characters, this means 64 bits) 1702 SB
390 2862 1664 (provides the capability to store the contents of 4 billion disk drives.  It will be a long time before the industry) 1664 SB
390 2908 484 (produces that many disk drives!) 484 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 35 35
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (35) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1665 (The Alpha architecture gets rave reviews from nearly all technical evaluations and is) 1665 SB
351 337 1765 (priced just above Intel\222s Pentium chip.  At one time, DEC had plans for a low cost Alpha) 1765 SB
351 396 1737 (chip to make another run at the PC world and knock Intel out of its leadership position.) 1737 SB
351 488 1783 (If DEC can recruit even a few credible partners and fix its marketing problems, it may still) 1783 SB
351 547 1024 (emerge from its troubles as a force to be dealt with.) 1024 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 36 36
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (36) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1268 (Analysis of the Company's) 1268 SB
351 397 1381 (Leadership and Organization) 1381 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 539 1757 (It is sickening for a long-time member of the DEC community to watch incompetent and) 1757 SB
351 598 1732 (uncaring management ruin the company.  The recent leadership record of DEC\222s senior) 1732 SB
351 657 579 (management is unimpressive:) 579 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 782 737 (Lack of any Strategy) 737 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 894 1718 (As one long CIO of a long time DEC business partner put it:  "When I go to Redmond) 1718 SB
351 953 1754 (and listen to Microsoft non-disclosures, everyone I talk to tells me the same story.  They) 1754 SB
351 1012 1751 (could all give the same presentation.  But when I go to New England and listen to DEC,) 1751 SB
351 1071 1712 (everyone seems to have their own agenda and everyone tells me a different story.  The) 1712 SB
351 1130 1793 (people at Microsoft know where they want to be.  The people at DEC can't seem to figure) 1793 SB
351 1189 139 (it out.") 139 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
490 1183 32 (37) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1281 1774 (This lack of strategy explains the many organizational failures.  After DEC\222s success with) 1774 SB
351 1340 1706 (VAX/VMS, the company lost its mission.  Is DEC a chip manufacturing company?  Is) 1706 SB
351 1399 1649 (DEC a computer system company, a software company, a UNIX company, a VMS) 1649 SB
351 1458 1784 (company, a PC company?  Without a clear mission and without a definition of success, no) 1784 SB
351 1517 696 (amount of reorganization will help.) 696 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1642 1782 (Illusory Leadership - Why is Management Hiding?) 1782 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1754 1723 (After some senior DEC vice-presidents stated publicly that VMS is intended for DEC's) 1723 SB
351 1813 1789 (installed base and growth will come from UNIX related sales, the DEC Users group in the) 1789 SB
351 1872 1704 (Boston area -- DEC's headquarters -- met in the fall of 1993 and invited DEC\222s senior) 1704 SB
351 1931 1749 (management to listen to their concerns.  These people, with millions of dollars and years) 1749 SB
351 1990 1742 (of training invested in VMS, represented some of DEC\222s largest customers from DEC\222s) 1742 SB
351 2049 1700 (home turf.  Those vice-president statements sent a signal to these customers that their) 1700 SB
351 2108 1766 (investment in information technology over the years would soon be obsolete.  Obviously,) 1766 SB
351 2167 424 (they were concerned.) 424 SB
351 2259 1772 (They sent invitations with several weeks advance notice and publicized the meeting in the) 1772 SB
351 2318 1788 (media.  Yet, incredibly, nobody from DEC's senior management showed up.  Instead, they) 1788 SB
351 2377 1769 (sent Brian Breton, a VMS product manager with no authority to change company policy,) 1769 SB
351 2436 1593 (to defend DEC's strategy or lack of strategy.  Brian did an admirable job, but his) 1593 SB
351 2495 1539 (statements carried no credibility.  Brian subsequently left DEC in April, 1994.) 1539 SB
351 2587 1605 (In 1992, Digital in Minneapolis had the opportunity to become a major vendor at) 1605 SB
351 2646 1750 (Fingerhut.  Fingerhut was interested in workstations, servers, and software development) 1750 SB
351 2705 1796 (to run its warehouses.  The local Digital sales team put together a comprehensive proposal) 1796 SB
351 2802 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2802 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2834 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2856 24 (37) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2862 1741 (Conversation with Mike Farrell, vice president of Information Services at NCS, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, May 10,) 1741 SB
390 2908 1601 (1994.  People from Koch Refinery and other DEC customers in the Twin Cities made similar statements.) 1601 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 37 37
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (37) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1763 (and submitted the proposal to Fingerhut.  Fingerhut asked to meet with a DEC executive) 1763 SB
351 337 1770 (for assurances that DEC would continue and enhance the proposed products.  Incredibly,) 1770 SB
351 396 1676 (the Minneapolis sales rep went through 18 DEC vice-presidents before he found one) 1676 SB
351 455 613 (willing to meet with Fingerhut.) 613 SB
351 547 1757 (Groups of senior field technical people meet twice yearly in New Hampshire.  Ken Olsen) 1757 SB
351 606 1777 (addressed both sets of meetings in 1991, listened intently to presentations from attendees,) 1777 SB
351 665 1762 (and even argued vehemently over some points.  We invited Bob Palmer and several vice-) 1762 SB
351 724 1771 (presidents to subsequent meetings.  Each time, they accepted, only to cancel or disappear) 1771 SB
351 783 1728 (on mysterious vacations at the last minute.  They had the opportunity to hear first-hand) 1728 SB
351 842 649 (feedback and chose not to listen.) 649 SB
351 934 1800 (These stories are typical of DEC senior management.  Contrary to press articles, the grass-) 1800 SB
351 993 1669 (roots view of management shows a group of people more interested in meeting with) 1669 SB
351 1052 825 (eachother than customers and employees.) 825 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1177 314 (Fair Play) 314 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1289 544 (This passage from a recent ) 544 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
895 1289 391 (Wall Street Journal) 391 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1286 1289 770 ( article describes the attitude of DEC\222s) 770 SB
351 1348 789 (current senior management on fair play:) 789 SB
426 1440 1691 (Last month, Mr. Lucente visited Dallas to meet with some of his troops in an attempt) 1691 SB
426 1499 1610 (to boost morale.  His message: I\222m here to listen -- ask me anything.  But when a) 1610 SB
426 1558 1676 (salesman requested elaboration of the company\222s strategy, which he called \221unclear\222,) 1676 SB
426 1617 1703 (Mr. Lucente shot back that he was \221sick of answering this question,\222 according to one) 1703 SB
426 1676 1620 (attendee.  Mr. Lucente then \221took his head off, belittling him in front of the whole) 1620 SB
426 1735 1026 (room  Needless to say, no one else asked anything.\222) 1026 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1452 1729 32 (38) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1827 1699 (Lucente was subsequently fired in April, 1994.  But several of his sales and marketing) 1699 SB
351 1886 1686 (vice-presidents and earlier middle managers remain.  The ones I met carried the same) 1686 SB
351 1945 960 (hostile attitude towards rank and file employees.) 960 SB
351 2037 1778 (The recent record on fair play leaves much to be desired.  Nearly every day, the employee) 1778 SB
351 2096 1781 (electronic grapevine carried yet another story about management misdeeds.  These stories) 1781 SB
351 2155 1191 (could easily fill a book.  The following examples are typical:) 1191 SB
351 2247 1618 (In July, 1993, after billions in losses and one profitable quarter, the DEC board of) 1618 SB
351 2306 1709 (directors raised Bob Palmer\222s salary from $770,000 per year to $990,000 per year -- a) 1709 SB
351 2365 1627 (28.5 percent increase.  In November, 1994, DEC cut its tuition reimbursement for) 1627 SB
351 2424 1672 (employee education.  Senior management relented after protests erupted all over the) 1672 SB
351 2483 1726 (company and pushed the decision down to local management.  But, in a sleight of hand) 1726 SB
351 2542 1678 (worthy of Houdini, they gave no budget to local offices to fund employee education.) 1678 SB
351 2634 1789 (In June, 1993, after hiring dozens of new vice-presidents, 9 months of offsite planning and) 1789 SB
351 2693 1753 (strategy meetings, and endless discussions, Bob Palmer\222s new CBU structure was finally) 1753 SB
351 2802 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2802 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2834 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2856 24 (38) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2862 1117 ( \223At Digital Equipment, A Resignation Reveals Key Problem:  Selling.\224, ) 1117 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 35 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1492 2861 364 (The Wall Street Journal) 364 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1856 2862 254 (, April 26, 1994,) 254 SB
390 2908 110 (page 1.) 110 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 38 38
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (38) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1746 (in place.  Senior management sent an electronic mail message to field sales and software) 1746 SB
351 337 1676 (consultants to either accept arbitrary new job assignments or face de-facto dismissal.) 1676 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
2027 331 32 (39) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 396 842 (Employees were given 24 hours to decide.) 842 SB
351 488 1744 (As week after week after week went by, each week brought a new rumor of yet another) 1744 SB
351 547 1661 (layoff round as managers would sneak away for secret, offsite meetings.  Life inside) 1661 SB
351 606 1771 (Digital Equipment Corporation became very unpleasant during 1992 and 1993 as the fear) 1771 SB
351 665 454 (and paranoia mounted.) 454 SB
351 2756 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2756 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2788 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2810 24 (39) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2816 1698 (I saw the memos to people in the DEC office in Minneapolis.  I made electronic inquiries to friends all over the) 1698 SB
390 2862 1745 (United States and found everyone in Sales, technical Sales Support, and Consulting, was given a similar letter and) 1745 SB
390 2908 167 (ultimatum.) 167 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 39 39
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (39) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
351 279 1771 (Appraisal of the Company's Handling) 1771 SB
351 397 695 (of its Situation) 695 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 539 412 (Bright spots include:) 412 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 629 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 634 350 (Alpha technology) 350 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 691 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 696 575 (hardware system engineering) 575 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 753 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 758 409 (the Alpha VMS port) 409 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 815 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 820 80 (PCs) 80 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 877 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 882 146 (storage) 146 SB
351 991 240 (Low points:) 240 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1081 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1086 1457 (lack of any coherent strategy compounded by internal conflicts of interest) 1457 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1143 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1148 496 (too many vice-presidents) 496 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1205 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1210 818 (a losing attitude throughout the company) 818 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1267 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1272 707 (chronic sales and marketing failures) 707 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1329 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1334 1105 (software engineering other than the VMS port to Alpha) 1105 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1391 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1396 336 (the Mips debacle) 336 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1453 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1458 1061 (outdated business practices that make customers mad) 1061 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 50 /Symbol font
426 1515 36 (\267 ) 75 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
501 1520 842 (failure to recruit significant Alpha partners) 842 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1662 1469 (Lack of Strategy and Conflicts of Interest) 1469 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1774 871 (If Digital is to survive, Palmer and his team ) 871 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Italic /font27 ANSIFont font
1222 1774 107 (must ) 107 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1329 1774 769 (address the strategy issue immediately.) 769 SB
351 1833 1628 (By mid 1994, since nobody can articulate any coherent strategy, people across the) 1628 SB
351 1892 1742 (company fill the vacuum with their own.  Without any guiding plan, the strategy for one) 1742 SB
351 1951 1660 (group often conflicts with strategies of other groups.  This leads to vice presidential) 1660 SB
351 2010 1145 (fiefdoms, who regularly duke it out in endless turf battles.) 1145 SB
351 2102 1740 (Operating systems are a prime example.  Digital offers VMS, UNIX, and Windows NT.) 1740 SB
351 2161 1745 (Nobody admits to a conflict in public, but behind the scenes, the UNIX group and VMS) 1745 SB
351 2220 1716 (group have been at war for years.  Both are after eachother\222s markets and both groups) 1716 SB
351 2279 1798 (regularly squash marketing and promotion efforts by the other group.  This war plays itself) 1798 SB
351 2338 1728 (out daily inside DEC with constant plots within plots within plots and political schemes) 1728 SB
351 2397 1734 (designed to gain advantage at the expense of the other camp.  Windows NT is not yet a) 1734 SB
351 2456 1332 (major DEC investment, but everyone is already suspicious of them.) 1332 SB
351 2548 1664 (Conflicts of interest are everywhere.  At the grass roots, Customer Service wants to) 1664 SB
351 2607 1748 (expand its base by offering consulting services.  But Digital Consulting offers consulting) 1748 SB
351 2666 1593 (services.  So Customer Service and Digital Consulting duke it out for consulting) 1593 SB
351 2725 195 (contracts.) 195 SB
351 2817 1754 (In sales, the end-user reps and indirect channels reps regularly duke it out over customer) 1754 SB
351 2876 1763 (situations.  The channels reps want to see the sale go through their favorite distributor or) 1763 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Symbol
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 40 40
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (40) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1712 (reseller.  The end-user reps want to sell directly to the end user.  The politics often get) 1712 SB
351 337 1271 (nasty as each camp hatches plots to outmaneuver the other side.) 1271 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 462 46 (T) 43 SB
394 462 375 (oo Many V) 372 SB
766 462 511 (ice Presidents) 511 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 574 877 (At last count, DEC had 126 vice-presidents.) 877 SB
32 0 0 31 31 0 0 0 28 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1228 568 32 (40) 32 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
1260 574 773 (  It is mind-boggling why any company) 773 SB
351 633 1725 (needs this many vice-presidents.  I clearly remember watching the electronic memos fly) 1725 SB
351 692 1787 (almost daily announcing yet another new vice-president of something.  For example, Sales) 1787 SB
351 751 1627 (has an overall vice-president company wide.  Russ Gullotti is vice-president of the) 1627 SB
351 810 1792 (Americas zone.  Scott Roeth is vice-president of sales in the United States.  There are also) 1792 SB
351 869 1711 (regional vice-presidents and several industry specific vice-presidents left over from the) 1711 SB
351 928 1776 (CBU days.  At the grass roots, nobody really knows who reports to whom or which vice-) 1776 SB
351 987 1709 (president is in charge.  Many people believe the vice-presidents do not know who is in) 1709 SB
351 1046 1593 (charge either, as they hatch plots against one another in an endless guerrilla war.) 1593 SB
351 1138 1746 (Meanwhile, as DEC continues to lose market share and lay off employees, the managers) 1746 SB
351 1197 1656 (and vice-presidents tend to get rid of the people with weak power bases.  These are) 1656 SB
351 1256 1773 (usually the technical support people at the bottom of the pyramid.  These people typically) 1773 SB
351 1315 1660 (find jobs at other companies or start their own businesses in direct competition with) 1660 SB
351 1374 1601 (Digital.  This further weakens the company and accelerates the downward spiral.) 1601 SB
351 1466 1703 (The dumb ideas, poor morale, losing attitude, and many of the failures over the recent) 1703 SB
351 1525 1780 (years can be traced directly back to internal conflicts of interest, political fiefdoms, hidden) 1780 SB
351 1584 1789 (agendas, and seething animosities inside DEC.  The system forces managers to spend their) 1789 SB
351 1643 1777 (energy waging internal political wars instead of serving customers.  Employees watch this) 1777 SB
351 1702 1800 (happen, eventually become cynical, and eventually either leave or are laid off.  DEC is on a) 1800 SB
351 1761 1677 (viscous downward spiral that will only stop if top management takes decisive action.) 1677 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1886 728 (What to do about it?) 728 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1998 1777 (After nearly 40 pages documenting DEC\222s problems in detail, this section offers some get) 1777 SB
351 2057 1328 (well suggestions from a long time member of the DEC community.) 1328 SB
351 2149 1784 (By mid 1994, DEC still has a limited opportunity to succeed but only if it takes immediate) 1784 SB
351 2208 346 (corrective action.) 346 SB
351 2300 1740 (First, senior management must come out from the shadows and interact with employees) 1740 SB
351 2359 1789 (and customers at the grass roots.  Beyond face to face meetings, they must get involved in) 1789 SB
351 2418 1651 (the electronic marketplace of ideas that regularly fly around the internet and DEC\222s) 1651 SB
351 2477 1663 (internal network.  DEC\222s electronic network is one of the most powerful interactive) 1663 SB
351 2536 1673 (communication mediums on earth and rank and file employees are expert at using its) 1673 SB
351 2595 1787 (capabilities to keep in touch with eachother and customers.  At the press of a few buttons,) 1787 SB
351 2654 1754 (people can send information to thousands of employees and customers around the world) 1754 SB
351 2713 1747 (in seconds  The top DEC managers serve their egos but ignore a motherlode of valuable) 1747 SB
351 2802 390 (                              ) 390 SB
741 2802 221 (                 ) 221 SB
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
599 1 351 2834 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 25 25 0 0 0 23 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 2856 24 (40) 24 SB
32 0 0 38 38 0 0 0 34 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
375 2862 1721 ( DEC keeps an internal electronic company database, called VTX,.  A friend in the Minneapolis office looked up) 1721 SB
390 2908 402 (this figure in VTX for me.) 402 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 41 41
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (41) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1611 (information by failing to exploit the electronic communication capabilities at their) 1611 SB
351 337 199 (fingertips.) 199 SB
351 429 1709 (Using data gathered from electronic conversations and face to face meetings, come up) 1709 SB
351 488 1786 (with a simple, specific, coherent strategy.  Write it down in one page or less and distribute) 1786 SB
351 547 1689 (it to all employees.  Use the electronic network to test it informally and get feedback.) 1689 SB
351 606 1683 (Then refine it and test it again until it is right.  Once the strategy is finished, convince) 1683 SB
351 665 1560 (everyone to buy into this strategy and then spin off operations not central to it.) 1560 SB
351 757 1638 (DEC management has a huge credibility problem with employees, Wall Street, and) 1638 SB
351 816 1754 (customers.  They can only overcome this problem by taking a genuine interest in the real) 1754 SB
351 875 1275 (marketplace and forgetting about internal political backstabbing.) 1275 SB
351 967 1615 (The analysts and pundits call for radical restructuring, massive layoffs, and selling) 1615 SB
351 1026 1741 (businesses.  This may well be the correct course of action.  But before blindly stumbling) 1741 SB
351 1085 1612 (into the next quick cure and lurching wildly from one strategy to the next, DEC\222s) 1612 SB
351 1144 1791 (management absolutely must begin listening to its employees and customers and develop a) 1791 SB
351 1203 1711 (coherent strategy that makes sense.  Management needs to understand why it is taking) 1711 SB
351 1262 1726 (action before doing it.  Once the strategy is in place, make the bold moves necessary to) 1726 SB
351 1321 205 (execute it.) 205 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
351 1446 988 (Some Specific Suggestions) 988 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 1558 1780 (These are suggestions from a former employee with a strong interest in the survival of the) 1780 SB
351 1617 1674 (DEC marketplace.  I offer these as a test to begin discussions, not as a final product.) 1674 SB
351 1676 1618 (These suggestions might be dumb ideas.  The only way to find out: offer them for) 1618 SB
351 1735 744 (discussion and see what people think.) 744 SB
351 1827 1615 (DEC needs to quit trying to kill VMS.  VMS and clustering are the only software) 1615 SB
351 1886 1717 (capabilities DEC has left that are unique.  Instead of apologizing and trying to milk the) 1717 SB
351 1945 1779 (product, DEC needs to actively develop and market it.  At one time, VMS had the largest) 1779 SB
351 2004 1790 (installed base and the richest set of application software of any computer operating system) 1790 SB
351 2063 981 (on earth.  In mid 1994, that base is shrinking fast.) 981 SB
351 2155 1692 (Begin active development again on DECwindows and offer a VMS PC with a usable,) 1692 SB
351 2214 1763 (standalone configuration for around $3000.  Add a MS-Windows programming interface) 1763 SB
351 2273 1758 (and recruit Microsoft and other PC application vendors to offer their applications on this) 1758 SB
351 2332 182 (platform.) 182 SB
351 2424 1750 (Spin off semiconductor operations into a wholly owned subsidiary or separate company.) 1750 SB
351 2483 1708 (This will help DEC find alpha partners to achieve its goal of making Alpha an industry) 1708 SB
351 2542 182 (standard.) 182 SB
351 2634 1725 (Spin off Storage, PCs, Consulting, Customer Service, Application Software, Terminals) 1725 SB
351 2693 1746 (and Printers, and Databases \(RDB\) into subsidiary companies.  Each of these businesses) 1746 SB
351 2752 1724 (are separate entities with their own interests and operating conventions.  It might make) 1724 SB
351 2811 1735 (sense for them to support themselves as separate businesses.  They would live or die on) 1735 SB
351 2870 337 (their own merits.) 337 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 42 42
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
351 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1630 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2101 3067 CB
2101 3069 50 (42) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 45 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
351 278 1766 (This would leave the parent company with a core system business based mostly on Alpha) 1766 SB
351 337 1762 (platforms.  The parent company would concentrate on these platforms and offer a choice) 1762 SB
351 396 1648 (of VMS, OSF/1 \(UNIX\), Windows NT, and perhaps Novell Netware for operating) 1648 SB
351 455 1725 (systems.  Customers and distributors would contract directly with Storage, Consulting,) 1725 SB
351 514 1792 (Customer Service, etc. for application software, support, and peripheral components.  In a) 1792 SB
351 573 1734 (free market, customers and distributors would also be free to contract with competitors) 1734 SB
351 632 574 (for value added components.) 574 SB
351 724 1723 (In large system integration situations, the Consulting company would contract with the) 1723 SB
351 783 1751 (DEC parent or another system vendor for hardware platforms, and with other subsidiary) 1751 SB
351 842 1253 (companies or outside vendors for other components as needed.) 1253 SB
351 934 1799 (The various operating systems offered by the remaining DEC parent company would likely) 1799 SB
351 993 1771 (compete with eachother for the same markets.  But this time, instead of guerrilla warfare,) 1771 SB
351 1052 1656 (actively promote the competition.  The sales force and distributors would be free to) 1656 SB
351 1111 1764 (choose products that make most sense in the individual situation, and engineering groups) 1764 SB
351 1170 1588 (would openly compete with eachother for sales in an internal market.  This way,) 1588 SB
351 1229 1494 (prosperity would be determined by market acceptance, not internal politics.) 1494 SB
351 1321 1741 (Time is fast running out.  DEC can still save itself by taking positive action.  And, in the) 1741 SB
351 1380 1784 (spirit of a free enterprise economy, if it takes the right steps, it will prosper.  If it takes the) 1784 SB
351 1439 464 (wrong steps, it will die.) 464 SB
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%BeginPageSetup
%%EndPageSetup
%%BeginPageSetup
%%EndPageSetup
%%Page: 43 43
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 90 8 9 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
63 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1342 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2923 2317 CB
2923 2319 50 (43) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 100 100 0 0 0 93 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
63 217 2334 (Appendix - Financial Performance over Several Y) 2328 SB
2391 217 207 (ears) 207 SB
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
63 392 1943 (Operating Summary -- Fiscal 1982 through Fiscal 1993) 1943 SB
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 502 CB
63 503 811 (Dollars not adjusted for inflation due to computer industry) 811 SB
gr
gs 894 4 52 541 CB
63 542 154 (economics) 154 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 30 /Helvetica-Oblique /font11 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 545 CB
99 546 800 (Dollars in millions except per share data and stock price) 800 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 545 CB
1004 546 72 (1993) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 545 CB
1191 546 72 (1992) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 545 CB
1378 546 72 (1991) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 545 CB
1566 546 72 (1990) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 545 CB
1753 546 72 (1989) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 545 CB
1940 546 72 (1988) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 545 CB
2128 546 72 (1987) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 545 CB
2315 546 72 (1986) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 545 CB
2502 546 72 (1985) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 545 CB
2689 546 72 (1984) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 545 CB
2877 546 72 (1983) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 545 CB
3064 546 72 (1982) 72 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
gs 894 59 52 588 CB
63 590 238 (Revenues) 238 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 653 CB
63 654 201 (Product Sales) 201 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 653 CB
1042 654 81 (7,588) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 653 CB
1229 654 81 (7,696) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 653 CB
1416 654 81 (8,299) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 653 CB
1604 654 81 (8,145) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 653 CB
1791 654 81 (8,190) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 653 CB
1978 654 81 (7,541) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 653 CB
2166 654 81 (6,254) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 653 CB
2353 654 81 (5,103) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 653 CB
2540 654 81 (4,530) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 653 CB
2727 654 81 (3,804) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 653 CB
2915 654 81 (2,828) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 653 CB
3102 654 81 (2,739) 81 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 696 CB
63 697 388 (Service and other revenues) 388 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
387 1 63 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 946 696 CB
1042 697 81 (6,783) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1042 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1133 696 CB
1229 697 81 (6,235) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1229 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1320 696 CB
1416 697 81 (5,612) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1416 731 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 1507 696 CB
1604 697 81 (4,797) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1604 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1695 696 CB
1791 697 81 (4,552) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1791 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1882 696 CB
1978 697 81 (3,934) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1978 731 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2069 696 CB
2166 697 81 (3,135) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 2166 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2257 696 CB
2353 697 81 (2,487) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 2353 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2444 696 CB
2540 697 81 (2,156) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 2540 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2631 696 CB
2727 697 81 (1,780) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 2727 731 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2818 696 CB
2915 697 81 (1,444) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 2915 731 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 3006 696 CB
3102 697 81 (1,142) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 3102 731 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 739 CB
63 740 406 (Total Operating Revenues) 406 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 739 CB
1024 740 99 (14,371) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 739 CB
1211 740 99 (13,931) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 739 CB
1398 740 99 (13,911) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 739 CB
1586 740 99 (12,942) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 739 CB
1773 740 99 (12,742) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 739 CB
1960 740 99 (11,475) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 739 CB
2166 740 81 (9,389) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 739 CB
2353 740 81 (7,590) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 739 CB
2540 740 81 (6,686) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 739 CB
2727 740 81 (5,584) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 739 CB
2915 740 81 (4,272) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 739 CB
3102 740 81 (3,881) 81 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
gs 894 59 52 821 CB
63 823 493 (Costs and Expenses) 493 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 886 CB
63 887 308 (Cost of Product sales) 308 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 886 CB
1042 887 81 (4,464) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 886 CB
1229 887 81 (4,248) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 886 CB
1416 887 81 (3,905) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 886 CB
1604 887 81 (3,826) 81 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 929 CB
63 930 621 (Service expense and cost of other revenues) 621 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
620 1 63 964 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 946 929 CB
1042 930 81 (4,167) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1042 964 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1133 929 CB
1229 930 81 (3,884) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1229 964 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1320 929 CB
1416 930 81 (3,373) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1416 964 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 1507 929 CB
1604 930 81 (2,969) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1604 964 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 972 CB
63 973 744 (Total cost of product sales and service expense) 744 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 972 CB
1042 973 81 (8,631) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 972 CB
1229 973 81 (8,132) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 972 CB
1416 973 81 (7,278) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 972 CB
1604 973 81 (6,795) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 972 CB
1791 973 81 (6,242) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 972 CB
1978 973 81 (5,468) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 972 CB
2166 973 81 (4,514) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 972 CB
2353 973 81 (4,282) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 972 CB
2540 973 81 (4,087) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 972 CB
2727 973 81 (3,379) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 972 CB
2915 973 81 (2,606) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 972 CB
3102 973 81 (2,188) 81 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1058 CB
63 1059 503 (Research and engineering expense) 503 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1058 CB
1042 1059 81 (1,530) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1058 CB
1229 1059 81 (1,754) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1058 CB
1416 1059 81 (1,649) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1058 CB
1604 1059 81 (1,614) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1058 CB
1791 1059 81 (1,525) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1058 CB
1978 1059 81 (1,306) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1058 CB
2166 1059 81 (1,010) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1058 CB
2380 1059 54 (814) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1058 CB
2567 1059 54 (717) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1058 CB
2754 1059 54 (631) 54 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1058 CB
2942 1059 54 (472) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1058 CB
3129 1059 54 (350) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1101 CB
63 1102 636 (Selling, General, and Administrative expense) 636 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1101 CB
1042 1102 81 (4,447) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1101 CB
1229 1102 81 (4,681) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1101 CB
1416 1102 81 (4,471) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1101 CB
1604 1102 81 (3,971) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1101 CB
1791 1102 81 (3,639) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1101 CB
1978 1102 81 (3,066) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1101 CB
2166 1102 81 (2,253) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1101 CB
2353 1102 81 (1,665) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1101 CB
2540 1102 81 (1,432) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1101 CB
2727 1102 81 (1,179) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1101 CB
2942 1102 54 (831) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1101 CB
3129 1102 54 (758) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1144 CB
63 1145 325 (Restructuring Charges) 325 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
324 1 63 1179 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1133 1144 CB
1229 1145 81 (1,500) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1229 1179 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1320 1144 CB
1416 1145 81 (1,100) 81 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
80 1 1416 1179 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 1507 1144 CB
1631 1145 54 (550) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 1631 1179 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 1187 CB
63 1188 384 (Operating Income \(Loss\)) 384 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 1187 CB
1047 1188 76 (\(237\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1187 CB
1207 1188 103 (\(2,136\)) 103 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1187 CB
1421 1188 76 (\(587\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1187 CB
1649 1188 36 (12) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1187 CB
1791 1188 81 (1,336) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1187 CB
1978 1188 81 (1,635) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1187 CB
2166 1188 81 (1,612) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1187 CB
2380 1188 54 (829) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1187 CB
2567 1188 54 (450) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1187 CB
2754 1188 54 (395) 54 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1187 CB
2942 1188 54 (363) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1187 CB
3129 1188 54 (585) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1269 CB
63 1270 221 (Interest Income) 221 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1269 CB
1087 1270 36 (64) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1269 CB
1274 1270 36 (96) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1269 CB
1443 1270 54 (113) 54 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1269 CB
1631 1270 54 (142) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1269 CB
1818 1270 54 (124) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1269 CB
2005 1270 54 (144) 54 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1269 CB
2193 1270 54 (122) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1269 CB
2380 1270 54 (116) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1269 CB
2585 1270 36 (63) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1269 CB
2772 1270 36 (41) 36 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1269 CB
2960 1270 36 (61) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1269 CB
3129 1270 54 (103) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1312 CB
63 1313 240 (Interest Expense) 240 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
239 1 63 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 946 1312 CB
1087 1313 36 (51) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1087 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1133 1312 CB
1274 1313 36 (39) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1274 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1320 1312 CB
1461 1313 36 (45) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1461 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 1507 1312 CB
1649 1313 36 (31) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1649 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1695 1312 CB
1836 1313 36 (39) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1836 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1882 1312 CB
2023 1313 36 (38) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 2023 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2069 1312 CB
2211 1313 36 (45) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 2211 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2257 1312 CB
2398 1313 36 (88) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 2398 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2444 1312 CB
2585 1313 36 (82) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 2585 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2631 1312 CB
2772 1313 36 (35) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 2772 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2818 1312 CB
2960 1313 36 (13) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 2960 1347 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 3006 1312 CB
3147 1313 36 (15) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 3147 1347 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 1355 CB
63 1356 740 (Profit \(Loss\) before cumulative effect of change) 740 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1398 CB
63 1399 357 (in accounting principle) 357 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 1398 CB
1047 1399 76 (\(224\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1398 CB
1207 1399 103 (\(2,079\)) 103 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1398 CB
1421 1399 76 (\(519\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1398 CB
1631 1399 54 (123) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1398 CB
1791 1399 81 (1,421) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1398 CB
1978 1399 81 (1,741) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1398 CB
2166 1399 81 (1,689) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1398 CB
2380 1399 54 (857) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1398 CB
2567 1399 54 (431) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1398 CB
2754 1399 54 (401) 54 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1398 CB
2942 1399 54 (411) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1398 CB
3129 1399 54 (673) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1441 CB
63 1442 374 (Provision for income taxes) 374 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
373 1 63 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 946 1441 CB
1087 1442 36 (27) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1087 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1133 1441 CB
1256 1442 54 (232) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 1256 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1320 1441 CB
1461 1442 36 (98) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1461 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 1507 1441 CB
1649 1442 36 (49) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 1649 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1695 1441 CB
1818 1442 54 (348) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 1818 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1882 1441 CB
2005 1442 54 (435) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 2005 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2069 1441 CB
2193 1442 54 (552) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 2193 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2257 1441 CB
2380 1442 54 (240) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 2380 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2444 1441 CB
2563 1442 58 (\(16\)) 58 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
57 1 2563 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2631 1441 CB
2772 1442 36 (72) 36 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
35 1 2772 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2818 1441 CB
2942 1442 54 (127) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 2942 1476 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 3006 1441 CB
3129 1442 54 (256) 54 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
53 1 3129 1476 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 1484 CB
63 1485 740 (Profit \(Loss\) before cumulative effect of change) 740 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1527 CB
63 1528 357 (in accounting principle) 357 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 1527 CB
1047 1528 76 (\(251\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1527 CB
1207 1528 103 (\(2,311\)) 103 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1527 CB
1421 1528 76 (\(617\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1527 CB
1649 1528 36 (74) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1527 CB
1791 1528 81 (1,073) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1527 CB
1978 1528 81 (1,306) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1527 CB
2166 1528 81 (1,137) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1527 CB
2380 1528 54 (617) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1527 CB
2567 1528 54 (447) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1527 CB
2754 1528 54 (329) 54 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1527 CB
2942 1528 54 (284) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1527 CB
3129 1528 54 (417) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1570 CB
63 1571 597 (Cumulative effect of change in accounting) 597 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1613 CB
63 1614 268 (principle, net of tax) 268 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1613 CB
1256 1614 54 (485) 54 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 1656 CB
63 1657 282 (Net income \(Loss\)) 282 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 1656 CB
1047 1657 76 (\(251\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1656 CB
1207 1657 103 (\(2,796\)) 103 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1656 CB
1421 1657 76 (\(617\)) 76 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1656 CB
1649 1657 36 (74) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1656 CB
1791 1657 81 (1,073) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1656 CB
1978 1657 81 (1,306) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1656 CB
2166 1657 81 (1,137) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1656 CB
2380 1657 54 (617) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1656 CB
2567 1657 54 (447) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1656 CB
2754 1657 54 (329) 54 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1656 CB
2942 1657 54 (284) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1656 CB
3129 1657 54 (417) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1738 CB
63 1739 694 (Weighted number of shares outstanding \(million\)) 694 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1738 CB
1006 1739 117 (130,409) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1738 CB
1193 1739 117 (124,864) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1738 CB
1380 1739 117 (121,558) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1738 CB
1568 1739 117 (125,222) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1738 CB
1755 1739 117 (127,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1738 CB
1942 1739 117 (132,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1738 CB
2130 1739 117 (133,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1738 CB
2317 1739 117 (131,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1738 CB
2504 1739 117 (124,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1738 CB
2691 1739 117 (115,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1738 CB
2879 1739 117 (113,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1738 CB
3066 1739 117 (111,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1781 CB
63 1782 395 (Net income \(loss\) per share) 395 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1781 CB
1038 1782 85 (\(1.92\)) 85 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1781 CB
1207 1782 103 (\(22.39\)) 103 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1781 CB
1412 1782 85 (\(5.08\)) 85 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1781 CB
1622 1782 63 (0.59) 63 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1781 CB
1809 1782 63 (8.45) 63 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1781 CB
1996 1782 63 (9.89) 63 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1781 CB
2184 1782 63 (8.55) 63 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1781 CB
2371 1782 63 (4.71) 63 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1781 CB
2558 1782 63 (3.60) 63 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1781 CB
2745 1782 63 (2.86) 63 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1781 CB
2933 1782 63 (2.51) 63 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1781 CB
3120 1782 63 (3.76) 63 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Helvetica-Oblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 44 44
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 90 8 9 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
63 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1342 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2923 2317 CB
2923 2319 50 (44) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
63 166 2256 (Financial Position Summaries, General Information, and Ratios) 2256 SB
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 30 /Helvetica-Oblique /font11 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 276 CB
91 277 816 (\(dollars in millions except per share data and stock price\)) 816 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 187 39 946 276 CB
1004 277 72 (1993) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 276 CB
1191 277 72 (1992) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 276 CB
1378 277 72 (1991) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 276 CB
1566 277 72 (1990) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 276 CB
1753 277 72 (1989) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 276 CB
1940 277 72 (1988) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 276 CB
2128 277 72 (1987) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 276 CB
2315 277 72 (1986) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 276 CB
2502 277 72 (1985) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 276 CB
2689 277 72 (1984) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 276 CB
2877 277 72 (1983) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 276 CB
3064 277 72 (1982) 72 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
gs 894 59 52 319 CB
63 321 673 (Financial Position Summary) 673 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 384 CB
63 385 155 (Inventories) 155 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 384 CB
1024 385 99 ($1,755) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 384 CB
1211 385 99 ($1,614) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 384 CB
1398 385 99 ($1,595) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 384 CB
1586 385 99 ($1,538) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 384 CB
1773 385 99 ($1,638) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 384 CB
1960 385 99 ($1,575) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 384 CB
2148 385 99 ($1,453) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 384 CB
2335 385 99 ($1,200) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 384 CB
2522 385 99 ($1,756) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 384 CB
2709 385 99 ($1,852) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 384 CB
2897 385 99 ($1,354) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 384 CB
3084 385 99 ($1,137) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 427 CB
63 428 534 (Accounts receivable, net of allowance) 534 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 427 CB
1024 428 99 ($3,020) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 427 CB
1211 428 99 ($3,594) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 427 CB
1398 428 99 ($3,317) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 427 CB
1586 428 99 ($3,207) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 427 CB
1773 428 99 ($2,965) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 427 CB
1960 428 99 ($2,592) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 427 CB
2148 428 99 ($2,312) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 427 CB
2335 428 99 ($1,903) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 427 CB
2522 428 99 ($1,539) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 427 CB
2709 428 99 ($1,527) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 427 CB
2897 428 99 ($1,125) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 427 CB
3111 428 72 ($808) 72 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 470 CB
63 471 482 (Net property, plant and equipment) 482 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 470 CB
1024 471 99 ($3,178) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 470 CB
1211 471 99 ($3,570) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 470 CB
1398 471 99 ($3,778) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 470 CB
1586 471 99 ($3,868) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 470 CB
1773 471 99 ($3,646) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 470 CB
1960 471 99 ($3,095) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 470 CB
2148 471 99 ($2,127) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 470 CB
2335 471 99 ($1,867) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 470 CB
2522 471 99 ($1,731) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 470 CB
2709 471 99 ($1,511) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 470 CB
2897 471 99 ($1,340) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 470 CB
3084 471 99 ($1,605) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 513 CB
63 514 174 (Total assets) 174 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 513 CB
1006 514 117 ($10,950) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 513 CB
1193 514 117 ($11,284) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 513 CB
1380 514 117 ($11,875) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 513 CB
1568 514 117 ($11,655) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 513 CB
1755 514 117 ($10,668) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 513 CB
1942 514 117 ($10,112) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 513 CB
2148 514 99 ($8,407) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 513 CB
2335 514 99 ($7,173) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 513 CB
2522 514 99 ($6,369) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 513 CB
2709 514 99 ($5,593) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 513 CB
2897 514 99 ($4,541) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 513 CB
3084 514 99 ($4,024) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 556 CB
63 557 215 (Long term debt) 215 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 556 CB
1024 557 99 ($1,018) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 556 CB
1256 557 54 ($42) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 556 CB
1425 557 72 ($150) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 556 CB
1613 557 72 ($150) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 556 CB
1800 557 72 ($136) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 556 CB
1987 557 72 ($124) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 556 CB
2175 557 72 ($269) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 556 CB
2362 557 72 ($333) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 556 CB
2549 557 72 ($837) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 556 CB
2736 557 72 ($441) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 556 CB
2942 557 54 ($93) 54 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 556 CB
3129 557 54 ($92) 54 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 599 CB
63 600 285 (Stockholders' equity) 285 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 599 CB
1024 600 99 ($4,885) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 599 CB
1211 600 99 ($4,931) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 599 CB
1398 600 99 ($7,624) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 599 CB
1586 600 99 ($8,182) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 599 CB
1773 600 99 ($8,036) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 599 CB
1960 600 99 ($7,510) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 599 CB
2148 600 99 ($6,294) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 599 CB
2335 600 99 ($5,728) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 599 CB
2522 600 99 ($4,555) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 599 CB
2709 600 99 ($3,979) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 599 CB
2897 600 99 ($3,541) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 599 CB
3084 600 99 ($3,165) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 642 CB
63 643 429 (Stockholders' equity per share) 429 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 642 CB
1024 643 99 ($36.19) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 642 CB
1211 643 99 ($38.58) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 642 CB
1398 643 99 ($61.18) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 642 CB
1586 643 99 ($66.76) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 642 CB
1773 643 99 ($66.12) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 642 CB
1960 643 99 ($59.47) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 642 CB
2148 643 99 ($49.87) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 642 CB
2335 643 99 ($44.54) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 642 CB
2522 643 99 ($38.43) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 642 CB
2709 643 99 ($34.42) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 642 CB
2897 643 99 ($31.42) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 642 CB
3084 643 99 ($28.65) 99 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
gs 894 59 52 685 CB
63 687 749 (General Information and Ratios) 749 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 894 39 52 750 CB
63 751 178 (Current ratio) 178 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 750 CB
958 751 72 (1.8:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 750 CB
1145 751 72 (1.4:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 750 CB
1332 751 72 (2.0:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 750 CB
1520 751 72 (2.3:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 750 CB
1707 751 72 (2.0:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 750 CB
1894 751 72 (2.9:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 750 CB
2082 751 72 (3.4:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 750 CB
2269 751 72 (4.9:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 750 CB
2456 751 72 (4.9:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 750 CB
2643 751 72 (3.8:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 750 CB
2831 751 72 (3.9:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 750 CB
3018 751 72 (4.1:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 790 CB
63 791 167 (Quick Ratio) 167 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 790 CB
958 791 72 (1.2:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 790 CB
1145 791 72 (1.0:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 790 CB
1332 791 72 (1.4:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 790 CB
1520 791 72 (1.6:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 790 CB
1707 791 72 (1.9:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 790 CB
1894 791 72 (2.0:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 790 CB
2082 791 72 (2.4:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 790 CB
2269 791 72 (3.5:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 790 CB
2456 791 72 (2.8:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 790 CB
2643 791 72 (1.9:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 790 CB
2831 791 72 (2.0:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 790 CB
3018 791 72 (2.3:1) 72 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 833 CB
63 834 229 (Working Capital) 229 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 833 CB
1024 834 99 ($2,964) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 833 CB
1211 834 99 ($2,015) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 833 CB
1398 834 99 ($3,777) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 833 CB
1586 834 99 ($4,332) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 833 CB
1773 834 99 ($4,501) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 833 CB
1960 834 99 ($4,516) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 833 CB
2148 834 99 ($4,377) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 833 CB
2335 834 99 ($4,223) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 833 CB
2522 834 99 ($3,694) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 833 CB
2709 834 99 ($3,001) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 833 CB
2897 834 99 ($2,377) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 833 CB
3084 834 99 ($2,181) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 876 CB
63 877 648 (Investments in property, plant, and equipment) 648 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 876 CB
1051 877 72 ($529) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 876 CB
1238 877 72 ($710) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 876 CB
1425 877 72 ($738) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 876 CB
1586 877 99 ($1,028) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 876 CB
1773 877 99 ($1,223) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 876 CB
1960 877 99 ($1,518) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 876 CB
2175 877 72 ($748) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 876 CB
2362 877 72 ($564) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 876 CB
2549 877 72 ($572) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 876 CB
2736 877 72 ($452) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 876 CB
2924 877 72 ($419) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 876 CB
3111 877 72 ($511) 72 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 919 CB
63 920 179 (Depreciation) 179 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 919 CB
1051 920 72 ($699) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 919 CB
1238 920 72 ($733) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 919 CB
1425 920 72 ($772) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 919 CB
1613 920 72 ($759) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 919 CB
1800 920 72 ($659) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 919 CB
1987 920 72 ($516) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 919 CB
2175 920 72 ($435) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 919 CB
2362 920 72 ($384) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 919 CB
2549 920 72 ($315) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 919 CB
2736 920 72 ($253) 72 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 919 CB
2924 920 72 ($203) 72 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 919 CB
3111 920 72 ($153) 72 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 962 CB
63 963 716 (Total debt as a percentage of total debt plus equity) 716 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 962 CB
1013 963 110 (17.50%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 962 CB
1218 963 92 (1.80%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 962 CB
1405 963 92 (2.20%) 92 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 962 CB
1593 963 92 (2.00%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 962 CB
1780 963 92 (2.00%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 962 CB
1967 963 92 (3.60%) 92 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 962 CB
2155 963 92 (4.20%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 962 CB
2342 963 92 (5.90%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 962 CB
2511 963 110 (15.70%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 962 CB
2698 963 110 (10.30%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 962 CB
2904 963 92 (3.00%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 962 CB
3091 963 92 (3.20%) 92 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1005 CB
63 1006 754 (Operating income \(loss\) as a percentage of revenues) 754 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1005 CB
1009 1006 114 (\(1.70%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1005 CB
1178 1006 132 (\(15.30%\)) 132 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1005 CB
1383 1006 114 (\(4.20%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1005 CB
1593 1006 92 (0.10%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1005 CB
1762 1006 110 (10.50%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1005 CB
1949 1006 110 (14.20%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1005 CB
2137 1006 110 (17.20%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1005 CB
2324 1006 110 (10.90%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1005 CB
2529 1006 92 (6.70%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1005 CB
2716 1006 92 (7.10%) 92 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1005 CB
2904 1006 92 (8.50%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1005 CB
3073 1006 110 (15.10%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1048 CB
63 1049 700 (Income before taxes as a percentage of revenues) 700 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1048 CB
1009 1049 114 (\(1.60%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1048 CB
1178 1049 132 (\(14.90%\)) 132 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1048 CB
1383 1049 114 (\(3.70%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1048 CB
1593 1049 92 (1.00%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1048 CB
1762 1049 110 (11.20%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1048 CB
1949 1049 110 (15.20%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1048 CB
2137 1049 110 (18.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1048 CB
2324 1049 110 (11.30%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1048 CB
2529 1049 92 (6.40%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1048 CB
2716 1049 92 (7.20%) 92 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1048 CB
2904 1049 92 (9.60%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1048 CB
3073 1049 110 (17.30%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1091 CB
63 1092 237 (Effective tax rate) 237 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1091 CB
1013 1092 110 (12.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1091 CB
1200 1092 110 (11.20%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1091 CB
1387 1092 110 (18.80%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1091 CB
1575 1092 110 (40.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1091 CB
1762 1092 110 (24.50%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1091 CB
1949 1092 110 (25.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1091 CB
2137 1092 110 (32.70%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1091 CB
2324 1092 110 (28.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1091 CB
2507 1092 114 (\(3.70%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1091 CB
2698 1092 110 (18.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1091 CB
2886 1092 110 (31.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1091 CB
3073 1092 110 (38.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1134 CB
63 1135 663 (Net income \(loss\) as a percentage of revenues) 663 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1134 CB
1009 1135 114 (\(1.70%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1134 CB
1178 1135 132 (\(20.10%\)) 132 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1134 CB
1383 1135 114 (\(4.40%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1134 CB
1593 1135 92 (0.60%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1134 CB
1780 1135 92 (8.40%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1134 CB
1949 1135 110 (11.40%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1134 CB
2137 1135 110 (12.10%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1134 CB
2342 1135 92 (8.10%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1134 CB
2529 1135 92 (6.70%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1134 CB
2716 1135 92 (5.90%) 92 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1134 CB
2904 1135 92 (6.60%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1134 CB
3073 1135 110 (10.70%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1177 CB
63 1178 821 (Net income \(loss\) as a percntg of avg stockholders' equity) 821 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1177 CB
1009 1178 114 (\(5.10%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1177 CB
1178 1178 132 (\(44.50%\)) 132 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1177 CB
1383 1178 114 (\(7.80%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1177 CB
1593 1178 92 (0.90%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1177 CB
1762 1178 110 (13.80%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1177 CB
1949 1178 110 (18.90%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1177 CB
2137 1178 110 (18.90%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1177 CB
2324 1178 110 (12.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1177 CB
2511 1178 110 (10.50%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1177 CB
2716 1178 92 (8.70%) 92 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1177 CB
2904 1178 92 (8.50%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1177 CB
3073 1178 110 (14.30%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1220 CB
63 1221 816 (Net income \(loss\) as a percentage of average total assets) 816 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1220 CB
1009 1221 114 (\(2.30%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1220 CB
1178 1221 132 (\(24.10%\)) 132 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1220 CB
1383 1221 114 (\(5.20%\)) 114 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1220 CB
1593 1221 92 (0.70%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1220 CB
1762 1221 110 (10.30%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1220 CB
1949 1221 110 (14.10%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1220 CB
2137 1221 110 (14.60%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1220 CB
2342 1221 92 (9.10%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1220 CB
2529 1221 92 (7.50%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1220 CB
2716 1221 92 (6.50%) 92 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1220 CB
2904 1221 92 (6.60%) 92 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1220 CB
3073 1221 110 (11.20%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1263 CB
63 1264 657 (Number days accounts receivable outstanding) 657 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1263 CB
1087 1264 36 (69) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1263 CB
1274 1264 36 (83) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1263 CB
1461 1264 36 (76) 36 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1263 CB
1649 1264 36 (86) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1263 CB
1836 1264 36 (76) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1263 CB
2023 1264 36 (75) 36 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1263 CB
2211 1264 36 (78) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1263 CB
2398 1264 36 (79) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1263 CB
2585 1264 36 (75) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1263 CB
2772 1264 36 (83) 36 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1263 CB
2960 1264 36 (82) 36 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1263 CB
3147 1264 36 (73) 36 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1306 CB
63 1307 211 (Inventory turns) 211 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1306 CB
1078 1307 45 (5.1) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1306 CB
1265 1307 45 (5.1) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1306 CB
1452 1307 45 (4.6) 45 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1306 CB
1640 1307 45 (4.3) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1306 CB
1827 1307 45 (3.9) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1306 CB
2014 1307 45 (3.6) 45 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1306 CB
2202 1307 45 (3.4) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1306 CB
2389 1307 45 (2.9) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1306 CB
2576 1307 45 (2.3) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1306 CB
2763 1307 45 (2.1) 45 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1306 CB
2951 1307 45 (2.1) 45 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1306 CB
3138 1307 45 (2.0) 45 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1349 CB
63 1350 606 (Number of employees at year end - regular) 606 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1349 CB
1024 1350 99 (89,900) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1349 CB
1193 1350 117 (107,900) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1349 CB
1380 1350 117 (115,100) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1349 CB
1568 1350 117 (116,900) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1349 CB
1755 1350 117 (118,400) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1349 CB
1942 1350 117 (113,900) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1349 CB
2130 1350 117 (103,000) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1349 CB
2335 1350 99 (88,300) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1349 CB
2522 1350 99 (83,000) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1349 CB
2709 1350 99 (79,800) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1349 CB
2897 1350 99 (68,100) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1349 CB
3084 1350 99 (67,100) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1392 CB
63 1393 579 (Number of employees at year end - other) 579 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1392 CB
1042 1393 81 (4,300) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1392 CB
1229 1393 81 (5,900) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1392 CB
1416 1393 81 (5,900) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1392 CB
1604 1393 81 (7,100) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1392 CB
1791 1393 81 (7,400) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1392 CB
1978 1393 81 (7,600) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1392 CB
2166 1393 81 (7,500) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1392 CB
2353 1393 81 (6,400) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1392 CB
2540 1393 81 (6,000) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1392 CB
2727 1393 81 (5,800) 81 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1392 CB
2915 1393 81 (4,900) 81 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1392 CB
3084 1393 99 (55,227) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1435 CB
63 1436 354 (Stockholders at year-end) 354 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1435 CB
1024 1436 99 (86,611) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1435 CB
1211 1436 99 (99,644) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1435 CB
1398 1436 99 (98,023) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1435 CB
1586 1436 99 (92,934) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1435 CB
1773 1436 99 (99,084) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1435 CB
1942 1436 117 (103,162) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1435 CB
2148 1436 99 (99,379) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1435 CB
2335 1436 99 (76,860) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1435 CB
2522 1436 99 (68,810) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1435 CB
2709 1436 99 (44,389) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1435 CB
2897 1436 99 (40,903) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1435 CB
3084 1436 99 (44,706) 99 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1478 CB
63 1479 674 (Common stock yearly high and low sales prices) 674 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1478 CB
958 1479 83 (49-30) 83 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1478 CB
1145 1479 83 (72-33) 83 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1478 CB
1332 1479 83 (87-45) 83 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1478 CB
1520 1479 101 (103-70) 101 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1478 CB
1707 1479 101 (122-86) 101 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1478 CB
1894 1479 101 (199-99) 101 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1478 CB
2082 1479 99 (174:82) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1478 CB
2269 1479 83 (94-46) 83 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1478 CB
2456 1479 83 (63-39) 83 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1478 CB
2643 1479 83 (61-33) 83 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1478 CB
2831 1479 83 (65-32) 83 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1478 CB
3018 1479 83 (55-34) 83 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1564 CB
63 1565 504 (SG&A as a percentage of revenues) 504 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1564 CB
1013 1565 110 (30.94%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1564 CB
1200 1565 110 (33.60%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1564 CB
1387 1565 110 (32.14%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1564 CB
1575 1565 110 (30.68%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1564 CB
1762 1565 110 (28.56%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1564 CB
1949 1565 110 (26.72%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1564 CB
2137 1565 110 (24.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1564 CB
2324 1565 110 (21.94%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1564 CB
2511 1565 110 (21.42%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1564 CB
2698 1565 110 (21.11%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1564 CB
2886 1565 110 (19.45%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1564 CB
3073 1565 110 (19.53%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1607 CB
63 1608 793 (SG&A percentage without special restructuring charges) 793 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1607 CB
1200 1608 110 (22.83%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1607 CB
1387 1608 110 (24.23%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1607 CB
1575 1608 110 (26.43%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1693 CB
63 1694 787 (Cost of Product Sales as a percentage of product sales) 787 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1693 CB
1013 1694 110 (58.83%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1693 CB
1200 1694 110 (55.20%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1693 CB
1387 1694 110 (47.05%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1693 CB
1575 1694 110 (46.97%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1736 CB
63 1737 716 (Service Expense as a percentage of Service Sales) 716 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1736 CB
1013 1737 110 (61.43%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1736 CB
1200 1737 110 (62.29%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1736 CB
1387 1737 110 (60.10%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1736 CB
1575 1737 110 (61.89%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1822 CB
63 1823 604 (Cost of Sales as a percentage of revenues) 604 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1822 CB
1013 1823 110 (60.06%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1822 CB
1200 1823 110 (58.37%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1822 CB
1387 1823 110 (52.32%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1822 CB
1575 1823 110 (52.50%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1822 CB
1762 1823 110 (48.99%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1822 CB
1949 1823 110 (47.65%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1822 CB
2137 1823 110 (48.08%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1822 CB
2324 1823 110 (56.42%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1822 CB
2511 1823 110 (61.13%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1822 CB
2698 1823 110 (60.51%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1822 CB
2886 1823 110 (61.00%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1822 CB
3073 1823 110 (56.38%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1865 CB
63 1866 482 (R&D as a percentage of revenues) 482 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1865 CB
1013 1866 110 (10.65%) 110 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
109 1 1013 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1133 1865 CB
1200 1866 110 (12.59%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 1200 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1320 1865 CB
1387 1866 110 (11.85%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 1387 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 1507 1865 CB
1575 1866 110 (12.47%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 1575 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1695 1865 CB
1762 1866 110 (11.97%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 1762 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 1882 1865 CB
1949 1866 110 (11.38%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 1949 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2069 1865 CB
2137 1866 110 (10.76%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 2137 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2257 1865 CB
2324 1866 110 (10.72%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 2324 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2444 1865 CB
2511 1866 110 (10.72%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 2511 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 2631 1865 CB
2698 1866 110 (11.30%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 2698 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 188 39 2818 1865 CB
2886 1866 110 (11.05%) 110 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
109 1 2886 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 187 39 3006 1865 CB
3091 1866 92 (9.02%) 92 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
91 1 3091 1900 B
1 F
n
gs 894 39 52 1908 CB
63 1909 711 (Cost of Sales + R&D as a percentage of revenues) 711 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1908 CB
1013 1909 110 (70.70%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1908 CB
1200 1909 110 (70.96%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1908 CB
1387 1909 110 (64.17%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1908 CB
1575 1909 110 (64.97%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1908 CB
1762 1909 110 (60.96%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1908 CB
1949 1909 110 (59.03%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1908 CB
2137 1909 110 (58.83%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1908 CB
2324 1909 110 (67.14%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1908 CB
2511 1909 110 (71.85%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1908 CB
2698 1909 110 (71.81%) 110 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1908 CB
2886 1909 110 (72.05%) 110 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1908 CB
3073 1909 110 (65.40%) 110 SB
gr
gs 894 39 52 1994 CB
63 1995 334 (Revenue Per Employee) 334 SB
gr
gs 187 39 946 1994 CB
1006 1995 117 (152,558) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1133 1994 CB
1193 1995 117 (122,417) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1320 1994 CB
1380 1995 117 (114,967) 117 SB
gr
gs 188 39 1507 1994 CB
1568 1995 117 (104,371) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1695 1994 CB
1755 1995 117 (101,288) 117 SB
gr
gs 187 39 1882 1994 CB
1960 1995 99 (94,444) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2069 1994 CB
2148 1995 99 (84,968) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2257 1994 CB
2335 1995 99 (80,148) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2444 1994 CB
2522 1995 99 (75,124) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 2631 1994 CB
2709 1995 99 (65,234) 99 SB
gr
gs 188 39 2818 1994 CB
2897 1995 99 (58,521) 99 SB
gr
gs 187 39 3006 1994 CB
3084 1995 99 (31,726) 99 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Helvetica-Oblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 45 45
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 90 8 9 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
63 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1342 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2923 2317 CB
2923 2319 50 (45) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
63 166 1365 (Graphs of various expense categories) 1365 SB
227 227 227 fC
/fm 256 def
345 531 M 0 -1430 -1561 0 0 1430 1561 0 4 PP
1 F
n
1 lc
1 lj
128 128 128 pC
0 4 SP
345 531 M 1561 0 1 PP
S
n
1906 531 M 0 1430 1 PP
S
n
1906 1961 M -1561 0 1 PP
S
n
345 1961 M 0 -1430 1 PP
S
n
0 0 0 pC
0 1 SP
gs 1 1431 345 531 CB
345 531 M 0 1430 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 1961 CB
333 1961 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 1782 CB
333 1782 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 1603 CB
333 1603 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 1425 CB
333 1425 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 1246 CB
333 1246 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 1067 CB
333 1067 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 889 CB
333 889 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 710 CB
333 710 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 26 1 333 531 CB
333 531 M 25 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1562 1 345 1961 CB
345 1961 M 1561 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 345 1948 CB
345 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 487 1948 CB
487 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 629 1948 CB
629 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 771 1948 CB
771 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 913 1948 CB
913 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 1055 1948 CB
1055 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 1197 1948 CB
1197 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 1339 1948 CB
1339 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 1481 1948 CB
1481 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 1622 1948 CB
1622 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 1764 1948 CB
1764 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 26 1906 1948 CB
1906 1973 M 0 -25 1 PP
S
n
gr
255 0 255 pC
0 4 SP
1906 1408 M -142 -48 1 PP
S
n
1764 1360 M -142 26 1 PP
S
n
1622 1386 M -141 26 1 PP
S
n
1481 1412 M -142 38 1 PP
S
n
1339 1450 M -142 33 1 PP
S
n
1197 1483 M -142 49 1 PP
S
n
1055 1532 M -142 37 1 PP
S
n
913 1569 M -142 9 1 PP
S
n
771 1578 M -142 5 1 PP
S
n
629 1583 M -142 30 1 PP
S
n
487 1613 M -142 -1 1 PP
S
n
255 255 0 pC
1906 1408 M -142 -48 1 PP
S
n
1764 1360 M -142 26 1 PP
S
n
1622 1386 M -141 26 1 PP
S
n
1481 1412 M -142 38 1 PP
S
n
1339 1450 M -142 33 1 PP
S
n
1197 1483 M -142 49 1 PP
S
n
1055 1532 M -142 37 1 PP
S
n
913 1569 M -142 9 1 PP
S
n
771 1578 M -142 5 1 PP
S
n
629 1583 M -142 30 1 PP
S
n
487 1613 M -142 -1 1 PP
S
n
0 255 255 pC
1764 1553 M -142 -25 1 PP
S
n
1622 1528 M -141 -40 1 PP
S
n
128 0 128 pC
1906 910 M -142 64 1 PP
S
n
1764 974 M -142 146 1 PP
S
n
1622 1120 M -141 1 1 PP
S
n
128 0 0 pC
1906 863 M -142 -15 1 PP
S
n
1764 848 M -142 39 1 PP
S
n
1622 887 M -141 -32 1 PP
S
n
0 128 128 pC
1906 888 M -142 30 1 PP
S
n
1764 918 M -142 108 1 PP
S
n
1622 1026 M -141 -3 1 PP
S
n
1481 1023 M -142 62 1 PP
S
n
1339 1085 M -142 24 1 PP
S
n
1197 1109 M -142 -7 1 PP
S
n
1055 1102 M -142 -149 1 PP
S
n
913 953 M -142 -85 1 PP
S
n
771 868 M -142 11 1 PP
S
n
629 879 M -142 -8 1 PP
S
n
487 871 M -142 82 1 PP
S
n
0 0 255 pC
1906 1771 M -142 -35 1 PP
S
n
1764 1736 M -142 13 1 PP
S
n
1622 1749 M -141 -11 1 PP
S
n
1481 1738 M -142 9 1 PP
S
n
1339 1747 M -142 10 1 PP
S
n
1197 1757 M -142 12 1 PP
S
n
1055 1769 M -142 0 1 PP
S
n
913 1769 M -142 0 1 PP
S
n
771 1769 M -142 -10 1 PP
S
n
629 1759 M -142 4 1 PP
S
n
487 1763 M -142 37 1 PP
S
n
0 207 255 pC
1906 697 M -142 -4 1 PP
S
n
1764 693 M -142 121 1 PP
S
n
1622 814 M -141 -14 1 PP
S
n
1481 800 M -142 72 1 PP
S
n
1339 872 M -142 34 1 PP
S
n
1197 906 M -142 3 1 PP
S
n
1055 909 M -142 -148 1 PP
S
n
913 761 M -142 -84 1 PP
S
n
771 677 M -142 1 1 PP
S
n
629 678 M -142 -5 1 PP
S
n
487 673 M -142 119 1 PP
S
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
gs 945 94 1014 331 CB
1032 348 33 (V) 34 SB
1066 348 268 (arious cost) 267 SB
1333 348 276 (s as percen) 277 SB
1610 348 17 (t) 16 SB
1626 348 160 (ages o) 159 SB
1785 348 157 (f sales) 157 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
197 1937 118 (0.00%) 118 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 1758 141 (10.00%) 141 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 1579 141 (20.00%) 141 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 1401 141 (30.00%) 141 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 1222 141 (40.00%) 141 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 1043 141 (50.00%) 141 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 865 141 (60.00%) 141 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 686 141 (70.00%) 141 SB
gr
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
174 507 141 (80.00%) 141 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
1881 2084 92 (1993) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
1739 2084 92 (1992) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
1597 2084 92 (1991) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
1455 2084 92 (1990) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
1313 2084 92 (1989) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
1171 2084 92 (1988) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
1029 2084 92 (1987) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
887 2084 92 (1986) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
745 2084 92 (1985) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
604 2084 92 (1984) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
462 2084 92 (1983) 92 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 2846 1946 63 276 CB
320 2084 92 (1982) 92 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 122 81 1065 2090 CB
1081 2105 90 (Year) 90 SB
gr
32 900 900 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 91 426 80 1033 CB
99 1443 398 (Percentage of Sales) 398 SB
gr
0 lc
0 lj
0 0 0 pC
0 1 SP
255 255 255 fC
/fm 256 def
939 759 1953 564 B
1 F
S
n
1 lc
1 lj
255 255 0 pC
0 4 SP
1969 596 M 84 0 1 PP
S
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 573 61 (SG) 60 SB
2122 573 56 (&A) 55 SB
2177 573 55 ( as) 56 SB
2233 573 12 ( ) 11 SB
2244 573 174 (a percent) 173 SB
2417 573 117 (age of) 116 SB
2533 573 12 ( ) 11 SB
2544 573 60 (rev) 58 SB
2602 573 112 (enues) 113 SB
gr
0 255 255 pC
1969 704 M 84 0 1 PP
S
n
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 681 61 (SG) 60 SB
2122 681 56 (&A) 55 SB
2177 681 151 ( percent) 150 SB
2327 681 120 (age wi) 119 SB
2446 681 93 (thout) 92 SB
2538 681 32 ( s) 33 SB
2571 681 77 (peci) 76 SB
2647 681 33 (al) 32 SB
gr
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 728 57 (res) 58 SB
2120 728 82 (truct) 81 SB
2201 728 47 (uri) 46 SB
2247 728 205 (ng charges) 206 SB
gr
128 0 128 pC
1969 813 M 84 0 1 PP
S
n
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 790 73 (Cos) 74 SB
2136 790 24 (t ) 23 SB
2159 790 36 (of) 35 SB
2194 790 40 ( P) 39 SB
2233 790 128 (roduct ) 127 SB
2360 790 61 (Sal) 60 SB
2420 790 43 (es) 44 SB
2464 790 12 ( ) 11 SB
2475 790 43 (as) 44 SB
2519 790 47 ( a ) 46 SB
2565 790 220 (percentage ) 219 SB
2784 790 36 (of) 35 SB
gr
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 837 151 (product ) 150 SB
2212 837 20 (s) 21 SB
2233 837 33 (al) 32 SB
2265 837 43 (es) 44 SB
gr
128 0 0 pC
1969 921 M 84 0 1 PP
S
n
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 898 88 (Serv) 85 SB
2147 898 10 (i) 9 SB
2156 898 84 (ce E) 83 SB
2239 898 22 (x) 21 SB
2260 898 89 (pens) 90 SB
2350 898 78 (e as) 79 SB
2429 898 12 ( ) 11 SB
2440 898 174 (a percent) 173 SB
2613 898 117 (age of) 116 SB
2729 898 12 ( ) 11 SB
2740 898 88 (Serv) 85 SB
2825 898 10 (i) 9 SB
2834 898 44 (ce) 44 SB
gr
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 945 61 (Sal) 60 SB
2122 945 43 (es) 44 SB
gr
0 128 128 pC
1969 1030 M 84 0 1 PP
S
n
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 1007 73 (Cos) 74 SB
2136 1007 24 (t ) 23 SB
2159 1007 36 (of) 35 SB
2194 1007 40 ( S) 39 SB
2233 1007 33 (al) 32 SB
2265 1007 43 (es) 44 SB
2309 1007 55 ( as) 56 SB
2365 1007 12 ( ) 11 SB
2376 1007 174 (a percent) 173 SB
2549 1007 117 (age of) 116 SB
2665 1007 12 ( ) 11 SB
2676 1007 60 (rev) 58 SB
2734 1007 112 (enues) 113 SB
gr
0 0 255 pC
1969 1138 M 84 0 1 PP
S
n
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 1115 100 (R&D ) 99 SB
2161 1115 43 (as) 44 SB
2205 1115 47 ( a ) 46 SB
2251 1115 220 (percentage ) 219 SB
2470 1115 36 (of) 35 SB
2505 1115 72 ( rev) 69 SB
2574 1115 112 (enues) 113 SB
gr
0 207 255 pC
1969 1247 M 84 0 1 PP
S
n
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 1224 73 (Cos) 74 SB
2136 1224 24 (t ) 23 SB
2159 1224 36 (of) 35 SB
2194 1224 40 ( S) 39 SB
2233 1224 33 (al) 32 SB
2265 1224 43 (es) 44 SB
2309 1224 37 ( +) 36 SB
2345 1224 12 ( ) 11 SB
2356 1224 100 (R&D ) 99 SB
2455 1224 43 (as) 44 SB
2499 1224 47 ( a ) 46 SB
2545 1224 220 (percentage ) 219 SB
2764 1224 36 (of) 35 SB
gr
gs 938 759 1954 564 CB
2062 1271 60 (rev) 58 SB
2120 1271 112 (enues) 113 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 46 46
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 90 8 9 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
63 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1342 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2923 2317 CB
2923 2319 50 (46) 50 SB
gr
255 255 255 fC
/fm 256 def
gs 2160 1068 63 256 CB
2162 1070 63 256 B
1 F
n
gr
227 227 227 fC
/fm 256 def
333 339 M 0 -805 -1678 0 0 805 1678 0 4 PP
1 F
n
1 lc
1 lj
128 128 128 pC
0 3 SP
333 339 M 1678 0 1 PP
S
n
2011 339 M 0 805 1 PP
S
n
2011 1144 M -1678 0 1 PP
S
n
333 1144 M 0 -805 1 PP
S
n
0 0 0 pC
0 1 SP
gs 1 806 333 339 CB
333 339 M 0 805 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 1144 CB
323 1144 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 1044 CB
323 1044 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 944 CB
323 944 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 841 CB
323 841 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 741 CB
323 741 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 641 CB
323 641 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 541 CB
323 541 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 439 CB
323 439 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 21 1 323 339 CB
323 339 M 20 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1679 1 333 1144 CB
333 1144 M 1678 0 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 333 1134 CB
333 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 486 1134 CB
486 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 638 1134 CB
638 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 791 1134 CB
791 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 943 1134 CB
943 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 1096 1134 CB
1096 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 1248 1134 CB
1248 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 1401 1134 CB
1401 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 1553 1134 CB
1553 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 1706 1134 CB
1706 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 1858 1134 CB
1858 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
gs 1 21 2011 1134 CB
2011 1154 M 0 -20 1 PP
S
n
gr
0 0 128 pC
0 3 SP
2011 376 M -153 153 1 PP
S
n
1858 529 M -152 37 1 PP
S
n
1706 566 M -153 53 1 PP
S
n
1553 619 M -152 15 1 PP
S
n
1401 634 M -153 35 1 PP
S
n
1248 669 M -152 47 1 PP
S
n
1096 716 M -153 25 1 PP
S
n
943 741 M -152 25 1 PP
S
n
791 766 M -153 50 1 PP
S
n
638 816 M -152 33 1 PP
S
n
486 849 M -153 135 1 PP
S
n
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
gs 362 67 961 274 CB
973 286 24 (R) 23 SB
996 286 32 (ev) 30 SB
1026 286 53 (enu) 52 SB
1078 286 17 (e) 18 SB
1096 286 9 ( ) 10 SB
1106 286 39 (Pe) 40 SB
1146 286 11 (r) 10 SB
1156 286 9 ( ) 10 SB
1166 286 49 (Em) 50 SB
1216 286 18 (p) 17 SB
1233 286 7 (l) 8 SB
1241 286 32 (oy) 35 SB
1276 286 34 (ee) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
281 1124 18 (0) 18 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
201 1024 36 (20) 35 SB
236 1024 9 (,) 10 SB
246 1024 36 (00) 35 SB
281 1024 18 (0) 18 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
201 924 36 (40) 35 SB
236 924 9 (,) 10 SB
246 924 36 (00) 35 SB
281 924 18 (0) 18 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
201 821 36 (60) 35 SB
236 821 9 (,) 10 SB
246 821 36 (00) 35 SB
281 821 18 (0) 18 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
201 721 36 (80) 35 SB
236 721 9 (,) 10 SB
246 721 36 (00) 35 SB
281 721 18 (0) 18 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
183 621 36 (10) 35 SB
218 621 27 (0,) 28 SB
246 621 18 (0) 17 SB
263 621 36 (00) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
183 521 36 (12) 35 SB
218 521 27 (0,) 28 SB
246 521 18 (0) 17 SB
263 521 36 (00) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
183 419 36 (14) 35 SB
218 419 27 (0,) 28 SB
246 419 18 (0) 17 SB
263 419 36 (00) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
183 319 36 (16) 35 SB
218 319 27 (0,) 28 SB
246 319 18 (0) 17 SB
263 319 36 (00) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
1976 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
2011 1171 36 (93) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
1823 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
1858 1171 36 (92) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
1671 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
1706 1171 36 (91) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
1518 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
1553 1171 36 (90) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
1366 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
1401 1171 36 (89) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
1213 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
1248 1171 36 (88) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
1061 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
1096 1171 36 (87) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
908 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
943 1171 36 (86) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
756 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
791 1171 36 (85) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
603 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
638 1171 36 (84) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
451 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
486 1171 36 (83) 35 SB
gr
gs 2160 1065 63 259 CB
298 1171 36 (19) 35 SB
333 1171 36 (82) 35 SB
gr
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 31 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 98 68 1123 1221 CB
1136 1234 23 (Y) 20 SB
1156 1234 18 (e) 20 SB
1176 1234 18 (a) 20 SB
1196 1234 13 (r) 13 SB
gr
32 900 900 33 33 0 0 0 30 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 67 397 111 544 CB
123 929 362 (Revenue Per Employee) 362 SB
gr
0 lc
0 lj
0 0 0 pC
0 1 SP
gs 2160 1068 63 256 CB
2159 1067 63 256 B
S
n
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%BeginPageSetup
%%EndPageSetup
%%BeginPageSetup
%%EndPageSetup
%%Page: 47 47
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
276 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1555 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2176 3067 CB
2176 3069 50 (47) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
276 311 1623 (Operating Results-- Fiscal 1994 Third Quarter) 1623 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 480 CB
1243 482 469 (Three Months Ended) 469 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 480 CB
1749 482 469 (Three Months Ended) 469 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 535 CB
1380 537 196 (2-Apr-94) 196 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 535 CB
1868 537 232 (27-Mar-93) 232 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 645 CB
276 647 327 ( Product Sales) 327 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 645 CB
1356 647 364 ( $1,749,621,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 645 CB
1862 647 364 ( $1,767,372,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 700 CB
276 702 609 ( Service & Other Revenues) 609 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 700 CB
1356 702 364 ( $1,509,168,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 700 CB
1862 702 364 ( $1,686,304,000) 364 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 755 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 755 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 755 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 755 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 755 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 755 CB
276 760 636 ( Total Operating Revenues) 636 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 755 CB
1356 760 364 ( $3,258,789,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 755 CB
1862 760 364 ( $3,453,676,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 865 CB
276 867 500 ( Cost of Product Sales) 500 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 865 CB
1356 867 364 ( $1,210,478,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 865 CB
1862 867 364 ( $1,049,969,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 920 CB
276 922 390 ( Service Expense) 390 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 920 CB
1398 922 322 ( $946,800,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 920 CB
1862 922 364 ( $1,030,728,000) 364 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 975 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 975 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 975 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 975 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 975 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 975 CB
276 980 469 ( Total Cost of Sales) 469 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 975 CB
1356 980 364 ( $2,157,278,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 975 CB
1862 980 364 ( $2,080,697,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1085 CB
276 1087 560 ( Research & Engineering) 560 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1085 CB
1398 1087 322 ( $316,767,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1085 CB
1904 1087 322 ( $350,423,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1140 CB
276 1142 591 ( Selling, General & Admin.) 591 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1140 CB
1398 1142 322 ( $954,903,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1140 CB
1862 1142 364 ( $1,050,600,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1195 CB
276 1197 693 ( Net Interest \(Income\)/Expense) 693 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1195 CB
1454 1197 266 ( $7,846,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1195 CB
2030 1197 196 ( $77,000) 196 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1250 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1250 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1250 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1250 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1250 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1250 CB
276 1255 651 ( Loss Before Income Taxes) 651 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1250 CB
1364 1255 356 ( $\(178,005,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1250 CB
1898 1255 328 ( $\(28,121,000\)) 328 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1360 CB
276 1362 622 ( Provision for Income Taxes) 622 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1360 CB
1454 1362 266 ( $5,301,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1360 CB
1960 1362 266 ( $2,000,000) 266 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1415 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1415 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1415 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1415 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1415 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1415 CB
276 1420 227 ( Net Loss) 227 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1415 CB
1364 1420 356 ( $\(183,306,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1415 CB
1898 1420 328 ( $\(30,121,000\)) 328 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1525 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1525 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1525 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1525 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1525 B
1 F
n
gs 959 55 265 1525 CB
276 1530 703 ( Dividends on Preferred Shares) 703 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1525 CB
1454 1530 266 ( $1,775,000) 266 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1580 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1580 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1580 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1580 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1580 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1580 CB
276 1585 925 ( Net Loss Applicable to common stock) 925 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1580 CB
1364 1585 356 ( $\(185,081,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1580 CB
1912 1585 314 ($\(30,121,000\)) 314 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1690 CB
276 1692 789 (Weighted Avg. Shares Outstanding) 789 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1690 CB
1440 1692 280 (137,897,533) 280 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1690 CB
1946 1692 280 (131,553,881) 280 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1745 CB
276 1747 701 ( Net Loss per Common Share) 701 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1745 CB
1546 1747 174 ( $\(1.34\)) 174 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1745 CB
2052 1747 174 ( $\(0.23\)) 174 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 48 48
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
276 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1555 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2176 3067 CB
2176 3069 50 (48) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
276 278 1719 (Operating Results, First 9 Months of Fiscal 1994) 1719 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 447 CB
1250 449 455 ( Nine Months Ended) 455 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 447 CB
1756 449 455 ( Nine Months Ended) 455 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 502 CB
1380 504 196 (2-Apr-94) 196 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 502 CB
1868 504 232 (27-Mar-93) 232 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 612 CB
276 614 327 ( Product Sales) 327 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 612 CB
1356 614 364 ( $4,966,549,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 612 CB
1862 614 364 ( $5,502,427,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 667 CB
276 669 609 ( Service & Other Revenues) 609 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 667 CB
1356 669 364 ( $4,561,267,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 667 CB
1862 669 364 ( $4,954,991,000) 364 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 722 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 722 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 722 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 722 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 722 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 722 CB
276 727 636 ( Total Operating Revenues) 636 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 722 CB
1356 727 364 ( $9,527,816,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 722 CB
1834 727 392 ( $10,457,418,000) 392 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 832 CB
276 834 500 ( Cost of Product Sales) 500 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 832 CB
1356 834 364 ( $3,304,185,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 832 CB
1862 834 364 ( $3,186,464,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 887 CB
276 889 390 ( Service Expense) 390 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 887 CB
1356 889 364 ( $2,859,150,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 887 CB
1862 889 364 ( $3,106,648,000) 364 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 942 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 942 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 942 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 942 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 942 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 942 CB
276 947 469 ( Total Cost of Sales) 469 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 942 CB
1356 947 364 ( $6,163,335,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 942 CB
1862 947 364 ( $6,293,112,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1052 CB
276 1054 560 ( Research & Engineering) 560 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1052 CB
1398 1054 322 ( $962,432,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1052 CB
1862 1054 364 ( $1,160,743,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1107 CB
276 1109 591 ( Selling, General & Admin.) 591 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1107 CB
1356 1109 364 ( $2,735,798,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1107 CB
1862 1109 364 ( $3,359,093,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1162 CB
276 1164 693 ( Net Interest \(Income\)/Expense) 693 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1162 CB
1426 1164 294 ( $13,596,000) 294 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1162 CB
1898 1164 328 ( $\(11,004,000\)) 328 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1217 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1217 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1217 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1217 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1217 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1217 CB
276 1222 701 ( Loss Before Income Taxes &) 701 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1272 CB
276 1274 695 ( Cumulative Effect of Change) 695 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1327 CB
276 1329 571 ( in Accounting Principle) 571 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1327 CB
1364 1329 356 ( $\(347,345,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1327 CB
1870 1329 356 ( $\(344,526,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1437 CB
276 1439 622 ( Provision for Income Taxes) 622 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1437 CB
1426 1439 294 ( $11,332,000) 294 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1437 CB
1932 1439 294 ( $20,000,000) 294 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1492 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1492 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1492 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1492 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1492 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1492 CB
276 1497 741 ( Loss Before Cumulative Effect) 741 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1547 CB
276 1549 605 ( of Change in Accounting) 605 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1602 CB
276 1604 225 ( Principle) 225 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1602 CB
1364 1604 356 ( $\(358,677,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1602 CB
1870 1604 356 ( $\(364,526,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1657 CB
276 1659 707 ( Cumulative Effect of Change in) 707 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1712 CB
276 1714 472 ( Accounting Principle) 472 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1712 CB
1426 1714 294 ( $20,042,000) 294 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1767 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1767 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1767 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1767 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1767 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1767 CB
276 1772 227 ( Net Loss) 227 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1767 CB
1364 1772 356 ( $\(338,635,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1767 CB
1870 1772 356 ( $\(364,526,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 1877 CB
276 1879 703 ( Dividends on Preferred Shares) 703 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 1877 CB
1454 1879 266 ( $1,775,000) 266 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 1932 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 1932 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 1932 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 1932 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 1932 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 1932 CB
276 1937 787 ( Net Loss Applicable to Common) 787 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 1932 CB
1364 1937 356 ( $\(340,410,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 1932 CB
1870 1937 356 ( $\(364,526,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 2042 CB
276 2044 775 (Weighted Avg Shares Outstanding) 775 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 2042 CB
1440 2044 280 (136,312,098) 280 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 2042 CB
1946 2044 280 (129,570,101) 280 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 2097 CB
276 2099 701 ( Net Loss per Common Share) 701 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 2152 CB
276 2154 671 ( Before Cumulative Effect of) 671 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 2207 CB
276 2209 768 ( Change in Accounting Principle) 768 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 2207 CB
1546 2209 174 ( $\(2.64\)) 174 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 2207 CB
2052 2209 174 ( $\(2.81\)) 174 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 2262 CB
276 2264 783 ( Earnings per Share on Cumulative) 783 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 2317 CB
276 2319 705 ( Effect of Change in Accounting) 705 SB
gr
gs 959 55 265 2372 CB
276 2374 209 ( Principle) 209 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1224 2372 CB
1580 2374 140 ( $0.14) 140 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
959 2 264 2427 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1224 2427 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1227 2427 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
2 2 1730 2427 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
502 2 1733 2427 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 959 55 265 2427 CB
276 2432 701 ( Net Loss per Common Share) 701 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 506 55 1224 2427 CB
1546 2432 174 ( $\(2.50\)) 174 SB
gr
gs 506 55 1730 2427 CB
2052 2432 174 ( $\(2.81\)) 174 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 49 49
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
276 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1555 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2176 3067 CB
2176 3069 50 (49) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
276 278 1942 (Financial Summary -- End of Third Quarter Fiscal 1994) 1942 SB
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
276 415 717 (Selected Balance Sheet Items) 717 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 1123 55 265 591 CB
607 593 440 (BALANCE SHEET:) 440 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 1123 55 265 646 CB
276 648 570 (Cash & Cash Equivalents) 570 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 646 CB
1451 648 364 ( $1,263,551,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 701 CB
276 703 576 (Accounts Receivable, Net) 576 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 701 CB
1451 703 364 ( $2,925,188,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 815 CB
276 817 637 (A/R Days Sales Outstanding) 637 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 815 CB
1759 817 56 (81) 56 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 929 CB
276 931 261 (Inventories:) 261 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 984 CB
276 986 318 (Raw Materials) 318 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 984 CB
1493 986 322 ( $497,340,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1039 CB
276 1041 369 (Work in Process) 369 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1039 CB
1493 1041 322 ( $640,798,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1094 CB
276 1096 354 (Finished Goods) 354 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1094 CB
1451 1096 364 ( $1,026,695,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1149 CB
276 1151 374 (Total Inventories) 374 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1149 CB
1451 1151 364 ( $2,164,833,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1263 CB
276 1265 1042 (Prepaid Expenses and Deferred Income Taxes) 1042 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1263 CB
1493 1265 322 ( $402,218,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1318 CB
276 1320 459 (Total Current Assets) 459 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1318 CB
1451 1320 364 ( $6,755,790,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1373 CB
276 1375 725 (Net Property, Plant & Equipment) 725 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1373 CB
1451 1375 364 ( $3,136,489,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1428 CB
276 1430 396 (Other Assets, Net) 396 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1428 CB
1493 1430 322 ( $902,822,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 58 265 1483 CB
276 1485 277 (Total Assets) 277 SB
gr
gs 437 58 1388 1483 CB
1423 1485 392 ( $10,795,101,000) 392 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
436 2 1388 1541 B
1 F
n
/fm 256 def
436 2 1388 1547 B
1 F
n
gs 1123 55 265 1599 CB
276 1601 884 (Bank Loans and Current Portion of LTD) 884 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1599 CB
1521 1601 294 ( $10,620,000) 294 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1713 CB
276 1715 501 (Restructuring Reserve) 501 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1713 CB
1493 1715 322 ( $276,341,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1768 CB
276 1770 520 (Total Current Liabilities) 520 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1768 CB
1451 1770 364 ( $3,473,509,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1823 CB
276 1825 786 (Noncurrent Deferred Income Taxes) 786 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1823 CB
1521 1825 294 ( $26,369,000) 294 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1937 CB
276 1939 348 (Long-term Debt) 348 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1937 CB
1451 1939 364 ( $1,017,427,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1992 CB
276 1994 522 (Postretirement Benefits) 522 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1992 CB
1451 1994 364 ( $1,239,573,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 2047 CB
276 2049 338 (Total Liabilities) 338 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 2047 CB
1451 2049 364 ( $5,756,878,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 2102 CB
276 2104 455 (Stockholders' Equity) 455 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 2102 CB
1451 2104 364 ( $5,038,223,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 2216 CB
276 2218 725 ( Book Value Per Common Share) 725 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 2216 CB
1647 2218 168 ( $33.73) 168 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 50 50
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
276 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1555 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2176 3067 CB
2176 3069 50 (50) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 58 58 0 0 0 54 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
276 278 872 (Cash Flow and Other Selected data) 872 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 1123 55 265 527 CB
667 529 319 (CASH FLOW:) 319 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 527 CB
1547 529 121 ( QTR) 121 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 527 CB
1974 529 115 ( YTD) 115 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 1123 55 265 582 CB
276 584 839 (Cash Flows from Operating Activities,) 839 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 582 CB
1459 584 356 ( $\(125,406,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 582 CB
1870 584 356 ( $\(366,054,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 637 CB
276 639 656 (Including Deprec. & Amort. of) 656 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 637 CB
1493 639 322 ( $160,223,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 637 CB
1904 639 322 ( $522,941,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 747 CB
276 749 819 (Cash Flows from Investing Activities,) 819 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 747 CB
1459 749 356 ( $\(144,555,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 747 CB
1870 749 356 ( $\(475,760,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 802 CB
276 804 742 (Including Investments in PP&E of) 742 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 802 CB
1493 804 322 ( $166,312,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 802 CB
1904 804 322 ( $514,382,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 916 CB
276 918 851 (Cash Flows from Financing Activities..) 851 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 916 CB
1493 918 322 ( $386,255,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 916 CB
1904 918 322 ( $462,170,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1026 CB
276 1028 831 (Net Increase/\(Decrease\) in Cash and) 831 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1081 CB
276 1083 392 (Cash Equivalents) 392 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1081 CB
1493 1083 322 ( $116,294,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 1081 CB
1870 1083 356 ( $\(379,644,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1191 CB
276 1193 443 (Non U.S. Revenues) 443 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1191 CB
1451 1193 364 ( $2,041,303,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 1191 CB
1862 1193 364 ( $5,896,648,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1246 CB
276 1248 75 (OR) 75 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1246 CB
1715 1248 100 (63%) 100 SB
gr
gs 411 55 1825 1246 CB
2126 1248 100 (62%) 100 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1356 CB
276 1358 694 (Employee Population:  Regular) 694 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1356 CB
1661 1358 154 (85,700) 154 SB
gr
gs 1123 55 265 1411 CB
276 1413 644 (                                     Other) 644 SB
gr
gs 437 55 1388 1411 CB
1689 1413 126 (6,300) 126 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 51 51
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
276 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1555 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2176 3067 CB
2176 3069 50 (51) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
276 278 1607 (Operating Results - Q1 and Q2 of Fiscal 1994) 1607 SB
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 324 50 941 480 CB
984 481 238 ( Q2 FY 1994) 238 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1265 480 CB
1308 481 238 ( Q2 FY 1993) 238 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1589 480 CB
1632 481 238 ( Q1 FY 1994) 238 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1913 480 CB
1956 481 238 ( Q1 FY 1993) 238 SB
gr
gs 324 50 941 545 CB
959 546 289 ( Three Months) 289 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1265 545 CB
1283 546 289 ( Three Months) 289 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1589 545 CB
1607 546 289 ( Three Months) 289 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1913 545 CB
1931 546 289 ( Three Months) 289 SB
gr
gs 324 50 941 600 CB
1033 601 141 ( Ended) 141 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1265 600 CB
1357 601 141 ( Ended) 141 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1589 600 CB
1681 601 141 ( Ended) 141 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1913 600 CB
2005 601 141 ( Ended) 141 SB
gr
gs 324 50 941 655 CB
996 656 215 (1-Jan-1994) 215 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1265 655 CB
1306 656 242 (26-Dec-1992) 242 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1589 655 CB
1645 656 213 (2-Oct-1993) 213 SB
gr
gs 324 50 1913 655 CB
1954 656 243 (26-Sep-1992) 243 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 676 48 265 758 CB
276 759 260 (Product Sales) 260 SB
gr
gs 324 48 941 758 CB
953 759 301 ( $1,659,924,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 758 CB
1277 759 301 ( $1,967,234,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 758 CB
1601 759 301 ( $1,557,004,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 758 CB
1925 759 301 ( $1,767,821,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 813 CB
276 814 499 (Service & Other Revenues) 499 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
498 2 276 856 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 941 813 CB
953 814 301 ( $1,594,155,000) 301 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
300 2 953 856 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1265 813 CB
1277 814 301 ( $1,722,209,000) 301 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
300 2 1277 856 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1589 813 CB
1601 814 301 ( $1,457,944,000) 301 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
300 2 1601 856 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1913 813 CB
1925 814 301 ( $1,546,478,000) 301 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
300 2 1925 856 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 676 50 265 868 CB
276 869 522 (Total Operating Revenues) 522 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 324 48 941 868 CB
953 869 301 ( $3,254,079,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 868 CB
1277 869 301 ( $3,689,443,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 868 CB
1601 869 301 ( $3,014,948,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 868 CB
1925 869 301 ( $3,314,299,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 978 CB
276 979 415 (Cost Of Product Sales) 415 SB
gr
gs 324 48 941 978 CB
953 979 301 ( $1,112,292,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 978 CB
1277 979 301 ( $1,116,538,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 978 CB
1636 979 266 ( $981,415,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 978 CB
1925 979 301 ( $1,019,957,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1033 CB
276 1034 316 (Service Expense) 316 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
315 2 276 1076 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 941 1033 CB
988 1034 266 ( $968,473,000) 266 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
265 2 988 1076 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1265 1033 CB
1277 1034 301 ( $1,058,270,000) 301 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
300 2 1277 1076 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1589 1033 CB
1636 1034 266 ( $943,877,000) 266 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
265 2 1636 1076 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1913 1033 CB
1925 1034 301 ( $1,017,650,000) 301 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
300 2 1925 1076 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 676 50 265 1088 CB
276 1089 387 (Total Cost Of Sales) 387 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 324 48 941 1088 CB
953 1089 301 ( $2,080,765,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 1088 CB
1277 1089 301 ( $2,174,808,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 1088 CB
1601 1089 301 ( $1,925,292,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 1088 CB
1925 1089 301 ( $2,037,607,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1198 CB
276 1199 452 (Research & Engineering) 452 SB
gr
gs 324 48 941 1198 CB
988 1199 266 ( $330,948,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 1198 CB
1312 1199 266 ( $404,843,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 1198 CB
1636 1199 266 ( $314,717,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 1198 CB
1960 1199 266 ( $405,477,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1253 CB
276 1254 484 (Selling, General & Admin.) 484 SB
gr
gs 324 48 941 1253 CB
988 1254 266 ( $908,688,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 1253 CB
1277 1254 301 ( $1,177,306,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 1253 CB
1636 1254 266 ( $872,207,000) 266 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 1253 CB
1925 1254 301 ( $1,131,187,000) 301 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1308 CB
276 1309 568 (Net Interest \(Income\)/Expense) 568 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
567 2 276 1351 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 941 1308 CB
1034 1309 220 ( $3,327,000) 220 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
219 2 1034 1351 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1265 1308 CB
1330 1309 248 ( $\(1,655,000\)) 248 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
247 2 1330 1351 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1589 1308 CB
1654 1309 248 ( $\(2,423,000\)) 248 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
247 2 1654 1351 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1913 1308 CB
2006 1309 220 ( $9,426,000) 220 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
219 2 2006 1351 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 676 50 265 1363 CB
276 1364 619 (Loss Before Income Taxes and) 619 SB
gr
gs 676 50 265 1418 CB
276 1419 629 (Cumulative Effect Of Change in) 629 SB
gr
gs 676 50 265 1473 CB
276 1474 421 (Accounting Principle) 421 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 324 48 941 1473 CB
983 1474 271 ( $\(69,649,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 1473 CB
1307 1474 271 ( $\(65,859,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 1473 CB
1631 1474 271 ( $\(99,691,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 1473 CB
1932 1474 294 ( $\(250,546,000\)) 294 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1528 CB
276 1529 525 (Provision For Income Taxes) 525 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
524 2 276 1571 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 941 1528 CB
1034 1529 220 ( $2,495,000) 220 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
219 2 1034 1571 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1265 1528 CB
1358 1529 220 ( $8,000,000) 220 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
219 2 1358 1571 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1589 1528 CB
1682 1529 220 ( $3,536,000) 220 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
219 2 1682 1571 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1913 1528 CB
1983 1529 243 ( $10,000,000) 243 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
242 2 1983 1571 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 676 50 265 1583 CB
276 1584 559 (Net Loss Before Cumulative) 559 SB
gr
gs 676 5 265 1633 CB
276 1634 116 (Effect) 116 SB
gr
gs 676 50 265 1638 CB
276 1639 506 (Of Change In Accounting) 506 SB
gr
gs 676 5 265 1688 CB
276 1689 178 (Principle) 178 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 324 48 941 1638 CB
983 1639 271 ( $\(72,144,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 1638 CB
1307 1639 271 ( $\(73,859,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 1638 CB
1608 1639 294 ( $\(103,227,000\)) 294 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 1638 CB
1932 1639 294 ( $\(260,546,000\)) 294 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1748 CB
276 1749 597 (Cumulative Effect Of Change In) 597 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1803 CB
276 1804 611 (Accounting Principle, Net Of Tax) 611 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
610 2 276 1846 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1589 1803 CB
1659 1804 243 ( $20,042,000) 243 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
242 2 1659 1846 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 676 50 265 1858 CB
276 1859 177 (Net Loss) 177 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 324 48 941 1858 CB
983 1859 271 ( $\(72,144,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 1858 CB
1307 1859 271 ( $\(73,859,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 1858 CB
1631 1859 271 ( $\(83,185,000\)) 271 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 1858 CB
1932 1859 294 ( $\(260,546,000\)) 294 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 1968 CB
276 1969 491 (Weighted Average Shares) 491 SB
gr
gs 676 7 265 2016 CB
276 2017 225 (Outstanding) 225 SB
gr
gs 324 48 941 1968 CB
1023 1969 231 (136,028,383) 231 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 1968 CB
1347 1969 231 (129,154,484) 231 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 1968 CB
1671 1969 231 (134,169,355) 231 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 1968 CB
1995 1969 231 (127,718,627) 231 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 2023 CB
276 2024 627 (Loss Before Cumulative Effect Of) 627 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 2078 CB
276 2079 585 (Change In Accounting Principle) 585 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 2133 CB
276 2134 200 ( Per Share) 200 SB
gr
gs 324 48 941 2133 CB
1110 2134 144 ( $\(0.53\)) 144 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 2133 CB
1434 2134 144 ( $\(0.57\)) 144 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 2133 CB
1758 2134 144 ( $\(0.76\)) 144 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 2133 CB
2082 2134 144 ( $\(2.04\)) 144 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 2188 CB
276 2189 607 ( Cumulative Effect Of Change in) 607 SB
gr
gs 676 48 265 2243 CB
276 2244 585 ( Accounting Principle Per share) 585 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
584 2 276 2286 B
1 F
n
gs 324 48 1589 2243 CB
1786 2244 116 ( $0.14) 116 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
115 2 1786 2286 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 39 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 676 50 265 2298 CB
276 2299 396 ( Net Loss Per Share) 396 SB
gr
32 0 0 42 42 0 0 0 38 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 324 48 941 2298 CB
1110 2299 144 ( $\(0.53\)) 144 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1265 2298 CB
1434 2299 144 ( $\(0.57\)) 144 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1589 2298 CB
1758 2299 144 ( $\(0.62\)) 144 SB
gr
gs 324 48 1913 2298 CB
2082 2299 144 ( $\(2.04\)) 144 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Page: 52 52
%%PageResources: (atend)
SS
0 0 8 8 833 1100 300 SM
32 0 0 33 33 0 0 0 29 /Times-Roman /font28 ANSIFont font
0 0 0 fC
276 127 216 (Scott Consulting) 216 SB
1555 127 521 (internet: 72102.136@CompuServe.com) 521 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Times-Bold /font25 ANSIFont font
gs 50 59 2176 3067 CB
2176 3069 50 (52) 50 SB
gr
32 0 0 75 75 0 0 0 68 /Helvetica-BoldOblique /font10 ANSIFont font
276 278 1658 (Operating Results - First 6 months Fiscal 1994) 1658 SB
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 427 61 1184 502 CB
1258 504 280 ( Six Months) 280 SB
gr
gs 428 61 1611 502 CB
1686 504 280 ( Six Months) 280 SB
gr
gs 427 61 1184 567 CB
1315 569 167 ( Ended) 167 SB
gr
gs 428 61 1611 567 CB
1743 569 167 ( Ended) 167 SB
gr
gs 427 61 1184 632 CB
1268 634 260 (1-Jan-1994) 260 SB
gr
gs 428 61 1611 632 CB
1679 634 294 (26-Dec-1992) 294 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 752 CB
276 754 313 (Product Sales) 313 SB
gr
gs 427 55 1184 752 CB
1237 754 364 ( $3,216,928,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 752 CB
1665 754 364 ( $3,735,055,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 807 CB
276 809 595 (Service & Other Revenues) 595 SB
gr
0 0 0 fC
/fm 256 def
594 1 276 860 B
1 F
n
gs 427 55 1184 807 CB
1237 809 364 ( $3,052,099,000) 364 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
363 1 1237 860 B
1 F
n
gs 428 55 1611 807 CB
1665 809 364 ( $3,268,687,000) 364 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
363 1 1665 860 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 862 CB
276 864 622 (Total Operating Revenues) 622 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 427 55 1184 862 CB
1237 864 364 ( $6,269,027,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 862 CB
1665 864 364 ( $7,003,742,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 972 CB
276 974 497 (Cost Of Product Sales) 497 SB
gr
gs 427 55 1184 972 CB
1237 974 364 ( $2,093,707,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 972 CB
1665 974 364 ( $2,136,495,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1027 CB
276 1029 376 (Service Expense) 376 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
375 1 276 1080 B
1 F
n
gs 427 55 1184 1027 CB
1237 1029 364 ( $1,912,350,000) 364 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
363 1 1237 1080 B
1 F
n
gs 428 55 1611 1027 CB
1665 1029 364 ( $2,075,920,000) 364 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
363 1 1665 1080 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 1082 CB
276 1084 463 (Total Cost Of Sales) 463 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 427 55 1184 1082 CB
1237 1084 364 ( $4,006,057,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 1082 CB
1665 1084 364 ( $4,212,415,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1192 CB
276 1194 546 (Research & Engineering) 546 SB
gr
gs 427 55 1184 1192 CB
1279 1194 322 ( $645,665,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 1192 CB
1707 1194 322 ( $810,320,000) 322 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1247 CB
276 1249 577 (Selling, General & Admin.) 577 SB
gr
gs 427 55 1184 1247 CB
1237 1249 364 ( $1,780,895,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 1247 CB
1665 1249 364 ( $2,308,493,000) 364 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1302 CB
276 1304 679 (Net Interest \(Income\)/Expense) 679 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
678 1 276 1355 B
1 F
n
gs 427 55 1184 1302 CB
1335 1304 266 ( $5,750,000) 266 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
265 1 1335 1355 B
1 F
n
gs 428 55 1611 1302 CB
1701 1304 328 ( $\(11,081,000\)) 328 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
327 1 1701 1355 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 1357 CB
276 1359 687 (Loss Before Income Taxes &) 687 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1412 CB
276 1414 689 (Cumulative Effect Of Change) 689 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1467 CB
276 1469 556 (In Accounting Principle) 556 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 427 55 1184 1467 CB
1245 1469 356 ( $\(169,340,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 1467 CB
1673 1469 356 ( $\(316,405,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1522 CB
276 1524 625 (Provision For Income Taxes) 625 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
624 1 276 1575 B
1 F
n
gs 427 55 1184 1522 CB
1335 1524 266 ( $6,031,000) 266 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
265 1 1335 1575 B
1 F
n
gs 428 55 1611 1522 CB
1735 1524 294 ( $18,000,000) 294 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
293 1 1735 1575 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 1577 CB
276 1579 727 (Loss Before Cumulative Effect) 727 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1632 CB
276 1634 823 (Of Change In Accounting Principle) 823 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 427 55 1184 1632 CB
1245 1634 356 ( $\(175,371,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 1632 CB
1673 1634 356 ( $\(334,405,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1687 CB
276 1689 706 (Cumulative Effect Of Change In) 706 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1742 CB
276 1744 458 (Accounting Principle) 458 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
457 1 276 1795 B
1 F
n
gs 427 55 1184 1742 CB
1307 1744 294 ( $20,042,000) 294 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
293 1 1307 1795 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 1797 CB
276 1799 213 (Net Loss) 213 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 427 55 1184 1797 CB
1245 1799 356 ( $\(155,329,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 1797 CB
1673 1799 356 ( $\(334,405,000\)) 356 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 1907 CB
276 1909 876 (Weighted Average Shares Outstanding) 876 SB
gr
gs 427 55 1184 1907 CB
1321 1909 280 (135,519,380) 280 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 1907 CB
1749 1909 280 (128,578,210) 280 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 1962 CB
276 1964 364 (Loss Per Share) 364 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 2017 CB
276 2019 665 (Before Cumulative Effect Of) 665 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 2072 CB
276 2074 767 ( Change In Accounting Principle) 767 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 427 55 1184 2072 CB
1455 2074 146 ( \(1.29\)) 146 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 2072 CB
1883 2074 146 ( \(2.60\)) 146 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 2127 CB
276 2129 799 ( Earnings Per Share On Cumulative) 799 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 2182 CB
276 2184 718 ( Effect Of Change In Accounting) 718 SB
gr
gs 919 55 265 2237 CB
276 2239 209 ( Principle) 209 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
208 1 276 2290 B
1 F
n
gs 427 55 1184 2237 CB
1489 2239 112 ( 0.14) 112 SB
gr
/fm 256 def
111 1 1489 2290 B
1 F
n
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 47 /Helvetica-Bold /font9 ANSIFont font
gs 919 55 265 2292 CB
276 2294 473 ( Net Loss Per Share) 473 SB
gr
32 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 46 /Helvetica /font8 ANSIFont font
gs 427 55 1184 2292 CB
1455 2294 146 ( \(1.15\)) 146 SB
gr
gs 428 55 1611 2292 CB
1883 2294 146 ( \(2.60\)) 146 SB
gr
1 #C
EJ RS
%%PageTrailer
%%PageResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-Roman
%%Trailer
SVDoc restore
end
%%Pages: 52
% TrueType font name key:
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT310000 = 
%    MSTT31c585 = 0da7DTimes New RomanF00000021000001900000
%    MSTT31c592 = 0da7DTimes New RomanF00000032000001900000
%    MSTT31c59f = 0da7DTimes New RomanF00000032000002bc0000
%    MSTT31c5ac = 0da7DArialF0000004b000002bc0001
%    MSTT31c5b7 = 0da7DArialF00000032000001900000
%    MSTT31c5c2 = 0da7DArialF00000032000002bc0000
%    MSTT31c5cd = 0da7DTimes New RomanF0000003a000002bc0000
%    MSTT31c5da = 0da7DArialF0000002a000001900000
%    MSTT31c5e5 = 0da7DTimes New RomanF0000002a000001900000
%    MSTT31c5f2 = 0da7DArialF0000002a000002bc0000
%%DocumentSuppliedResources: procset Win35Dict 3 1

%%DocumentNeededResources: font Helvetica
%%+ font Helvetica-Bold
%%+ font Helvetica-BoldOblique
%%+ font Helvetica-Oblique
%%+ font Symbol
%%+ font Times-Bold
%%+ font Times-BoldItalic
%%+ font Times-Italic
%%+ font Times-Roman

%%EOF
3231.2What grade did he get???KYOSS1::BOYLEDirty Jobs Done Dirt CheapTue Jul 05 1994 17:488
    Noting that this paper was created for an MBA class, it would be
    interesting to know what grade was given....
    
    Anyway, the "to-do" list reads out of Spencer Katt's rumor column.  I
    do agree that it is in all our best interest to get Digital back in
    fighting form ASAP to maintain everyones lifestyle.
    
    Jack
3231.3HAAG::HAAGMachine42. One last time.Tue Jul 05 1994 18:228
    re -1
    
    Greg was awarded an A for the class he wrote the paper for. Although
    the paper was only a part of the overall class. I posted it exactly as
    he requested. I didn't have the opportunity to review it for him before
    he sent it to the BODs. He said he was in a bit of a hurry. Typical, if
    you know Greg. :-)
    
3231.4Job well doneMROA::MAHONEYTue Jul 05 1994 20:538
    Impressive work! Of course I cannot give my opinion till I fully read
    it and "digest" it. It doesn't surprised me that he got an A... it is
    about time that we see high level work being done by "graduated"
    students. I will enjoy reading his work over the week-end.
    
    Ana
    
    
3231.5SX4GTO::WANNOORWed Jul 06 1994 01:132
    Perhaps someone could post a text version? A lot easier to read
    remotely...
3231.6mezzo mezzoARCANA::CONNELLYfoggy, rather groggyWed Jul 06 1994 01:2712
I read it and was not all that impressed, although there was some interesting
stuff in it.  From a style standpoint, there was a bit too much repetition of
stock phrases ("laughingstock of the industry", etc.) and personal reactions
(by the third time, yup, i did get the fact that he found Digital's decline
"sickening").  On the plus side, i never realized that the BI bus was such a
negative thing for Digital (but then i never paid that much attention to buses)
...on the minus side, his prescriptions to management didn't seem all that
coherent though (like trying to revive VMS as our main operating system so the
installed base would stop deserting us).  Worth reading, but with a few grains
of salt.
								- paul
3231.7Wordier is the key!NYEM1::CRANEWed Jul 06 1994 10:562
    In all of my grad work I realized that the wordier the paper the better
    grade one would receive.
3231.8BHAJEE::JAERVINENOra, the Old Rural AmateurWed Jul 06 1994 11:502
    I tried to print the paper, but as so often with Postscript produced by
    MS software, the printer (3250) choked in the middle of the job.
3231.9a VMS centric view?TROOA::MSCHNEIDERWhat is the strategy this hour?Wed Jul 06 1994 12:398
    I found the paper interesting, but often less than objective.  Not
    really what I would expect from an academic paper in terms of writing
    style.  Terms like absurd, dumb, and laughingstock make it sound like a
    personal diatribe at times.
    
    I found the idea of a "VMS PC" (pg.41) a bit puzzling.  The time for
    this kind of thing has passed.  VMS on the desktop is dead.  Get over
    it and move on!
3231.10Intelligent Printer? :-)HLDE01::VUURBOOM_RRoelof Vuurboom @ APD, DTN 829 4066Wed Jul 06 1994 13:206
>    I tried to print the paper, but as so often with Postscript produced by
>    MS software, the printer (3250) choked in the middle of the job.
    
    Perhaps the printer was reading the paper as it was printing?
    
    :^)
3231.11Is the LAUGHINGSTOCK widely known in grad schools?ANGLIN::PEREZTrust, but ALWAYS verify!Wed Jul 06 1994 14:1313
    I had a similar experience while skiing at a ski area late last winter. 
    I rode up in the chairlift with a guy and the conversation turned to
    what we did.  After I reluctantly admitted where I worked it turned out
    that he was a student at the University of Minnesota who knew of us. 
    BECAUSE WE WERE THE EXAMPLE IN A GRAD SCHOOL CLASS ON HOW NOT TO MANAGE
    A COMPANY.  Apparently, they were studying in great detail the decline
    of the company as it was related to management decisions and their
    effect on the work force.
    
    He had a number of interesting comments attributed to the class,
    several of which were similar to those in the paper.  Are we being used
    as an example in other institutions of higher education around the
    country/world?  
3231.12Can't Print!!!ASABET::LONDONWed Jul 06 1994 14:205
    could someone write out exactly how to print this document
    
    Thanks,
    
    Michael
3231.13ISLNDS::YANNEKISWed Jul 06 1994 14:2223
    
>    He had a number of interesting comments attributed to the class,
>    several of which were similar to those in the paper.  Are we being used
>    as an example in other institutions of higher education around the
>    country/world?  
    
    Digital was used as an exanple at the MIT Sloan School of Management in
    the 89-90 time frame.  
    
    In our Human  Relations class we discussed the transition program from
    the early 80s when Digital did not lay off manufacturing folks and
    moved them to other jobs throughout the company.  The class was very
    positive about the program and Digital's resistance to layoffs.  Then
    the professor started asking questions like ... did Digital figure out
    why they had over-hired, had they done anything structuarally to
    prevent the over-hiring from occuring in manufacturing during the next
    boom, had people been placed in jobs that gave Digital a competative
    advantage.  The last rhetorical question was something like .. and what
    do you think Digital will be forced to do when the boom from VAXes
    crashes?  The class was not so positve after that discussion.  
                                                           
    Greg
           
3231.14HAAG::HAAGMachine42. One last time.Wed Jul 06 1994 15:2829
    
    
Note 3231.11 by ANGLIN::PEREZ
    
    >  Are we being used
    >as an example in other institutions of higher education around the
    >country/world?  
    
    i bet we are. and for some not very pleasant reasons. this is just MHO,
    but BP is right. we HAVE leading products in many areas right now. and
    THATS why DEC will be studied in business schools (and others as well)
    for decades to come. if you think about it, most established high tech
    business fail because they tend to fall behind in delivering newer and
    better technologies. Wang, CDC, etc. all fall into that category. but
    not us. we seem to be failing while having superior products and a
    leadership role in some of the areas that should be making us very
    successful. but we're not. we can only blame ourselves for the mess we
    are in. not the economy. not poor marketing (tho is could be better).
    not inferior products. just ourselves.
    
    gregs paper basically says just that. in a round about and, IMHO, a bit
    cumbersome way. but that's what it says. 
    
    while i try to be optimistic, it gets harder by the day. with the
    attrition and those laid off in the ongoing rounds of TFSO, it appears
    to me that we are choosing, either intentionally or otherwise, to NOT
    compete in lots of places we should and could win. and i can't remember
    the last time we won any kind of a competitive bid when we didn't
    compete.
3231.15it is easy...MROA::MAHONEYWed Jul 06 1994 18:067
    To print this doc you must extract it first, then edit and delete
    everything up to the symbols starting by the word "adobe"..... close
    the doc and give it a name making sure to use .ps following the title,
    then you send it to the printer ( make sure to send the document to a
    printer that can handle postscript documents).  The extract/noheader
    doesn't work here because you must clean lines and top part of notes.
    Ana
3231.16TOOHOT::LEEDSFrom VAXinated to AlphaholicWed Jul 06 1994 18:1010
re: .9


>    
>    I found the idea of a "VMS PC" (pg.41) a bit puzzling.  The time for
>    this kind of thing has passed.  VMS on the desktop is dead.  Get over
>    it and move on!


NOT !!!!!!!
3231.17VMS on a desk top :== NTEPS::MARISONWed Jul 06 1994 18:184
    VMS on a Desktop?  I think we call this NT or atleast close enough.
    
    Ed
    
3231.18if your queue does not say DCPS$SMB, ask for a better oneREGENT::REGENT::JORRYWed Jul 06 1994 18:4911
re .15

As the topic came up, if you are a DCPS user, the top lines will be printed
in text mode, and the body in PostScript automaticaly.

Great for mail, notes .... Only drawback, it does not revert to text for 
trailers.

DCPS is the normal VMS symbiont for PS printers

Alain
3231.19QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centWed Jul 06 1994 20:045
Re: .17

What a kidder!  Doesn't even begin to come close.

				Steve
3231.20Just kill that Golden Goose!NYOSS1::CATANIAWed Jul 06 1994 21:598
    RE: Last Few
    
    As a company we killed VMS to our own detriment!  Look how old Unix
    is.  VMS is younger, but we just could'nt follow through!  This is one
    big failure that cost us big time!
    
    - Mike
    
3231.21SX4GTO::WANNOORWed Jul 06 1994 22:333
    Previous notes: we can't even print a postscript document without doing
    engineering "techie" stuff like editing header lines. Perhaps this is
    symptomatic?
3231.22MRFISH::SIMMONSKF0JX-Network ConsultantWed Jul 06 1994 22:583
    Extract/Noheader  "file.name" then print the file to a postscript printer 
    is all you need to do. I don't think this or editing header lines is
    "engineering "techie" stuff". I think it is just computer stuff. IMHO
3231.23If system SW is up-to-date, Notes' PRINT command will do itVMSSPT::LYCEUM::CURTISDick "Aristotle" CurtisThu Jul 07 1994 00:274
    Good Lord, people, are there so many systems out there running CPS and
    not DCPS?
    
    Dick
3231.24SPECXN::WITHERSBob WithersThu Jul 07 1994 04:2216
Yes, Steve, VMS doesn't even come close to NT.  As to VMS on a desktop was an
idea being worked as recently as 3-4 years ago when people were designing a
PC-addin VAX board.  The project required so many resources (particularly RAM)
that the project never went anywhere.

Although Greg's reportage is goading, the points are right-on.  Greg was
probably trying to be provocative and he succeeds.

>================================================================================
>Note 3231.19            The Demise of DEC - by Greg Scott               19 of 20
>QUARK::LIONEL "Free advice is worth every cent"       5 lines   6-JUL-1994 16:04
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Re: .17
>
>What a kidder!
3231.25FILTON::ROBINSON_MShuffling the DECThu Jul 07 1994 08:3911
    I found the document to be depressing.  There about 45 pages of well
    researched and anecdotal items, and a page of recommendations.
    
    I think Greg has the making of a good popular historian.  This is a bit
    like 'Soul of a New Machine', in reverse!
    
    Unfortunately, only in Hollywood could Greg's recommendations every be
    followed out to the letter, and be successful.  I am not sure that we
    can ride off into the sunset whistling a happy tune.
    
    Martin
3231.26Still running VMS 5.5-2...ROWLET::AINSLEYLess than 150 kts. is TOO slow!Thu Jul 07 1994 12:317
re: .23

Yep.  A lot of systems don't have system managers anymore.  Ours was TFSO'd last
year.  Our system management philosophy is to fix things when they break, if
we really need it.

Bob
3231.27Comparison with PhillipsESSB::PBUTLERThu Jul 07 1994 12:4514
    A comparison between Digital and the European PHILLIPS Corp. might have
    been usefull. Phillips also developed great products which didn't sell
    as well as they should have. Remember double-sided videos and Beta video 
    recorders. And they paid the price for that (big losses and downsizing). 
    
    They also had many years of being "too" profitable and developed those 
    dreaded diseases, arrogance and complacency, which characterised the 
    old Digital.
    
    Maybe Bob should have some Phillips people help us see the situation
    we're in is not so unique. Other companies have come through this and 
    succeeded, so should we.
    
    - Peter, in sunny Galway.
3231.28Back to the print problem, when shipping to an ...ODIXIE::SEDVM2::COLEParadigm: A 50 cent word downsized 60%Thu Jul 07 1994 13:079
	... LPS20 and a DEClaser 5100, my output blows up on the second line of
the footnote on the first page. Something about "unknown command - rP ..." a few 
more lines of Adobe mumbo-jumbo, then a stack dump with the data line containing 
the second line of the footnote.  I scoured the Adobe text file for that "unknown 
command", and could find anything that made sense, at least to me.  Possibly a
stack pointer problem in the Adobe translator?

	Maybe those with successful prints could tell us more, like which 
printers? :>)
3231.29I can't see the end of the tunnel...CX3PST::CSC32::R_MCBRIDEThis LAN is made for you and me...Thu Jul 07 1994 13:2017
    O.K.!
    So we sell the disk drive business because it's making money.   
    And we sell the PC business, our growing business making money. 
    And we sell the chip business with our chip-of-the-century, ALPHA.
    We sell our system integration business, a billion dollar business.
    Marketing ALPHA has killed our VAX/VMS business.
    Ultrix never caught on the way VMS did, the real money is in windows
    	but we will have sold the alpha anyway.
    We sell our NETwork businesses (they are still making some money but
    not a lot by industry standards)
    We sell our MCS to a competitor.
    PC's service is already outsourced.
    
    We don't do operating systems, we don't do cpu/storage hardware, we
    don't do systems integration.  
    
    What is left?
3231.30Count more BEANSFILTON::ROBINSON_MShuffling the DECThu Jul 07 1994 13:244
    re .29
    
    Obvious - leaves management as our core competency.  See the SES/IDC
    discussion.
3231.31 And we can all see the result of how good they are!!! SUBURB::POWELLMNostalgia isn't what it used to be!Thu Jul 07 1994 13:341
    
3231.32It's PHILIPS with one 'L'BHAJEE::JAERVINENOra, the Old Rural AmateurThu Jul 07 1994 13:562
    And we tried to help Philips by buying their computer operations...
    
3231.33He just scratched the surface - LIGHTLY!ROWLET::AINSLEYLess than 150 kts. is TOO slow!Thu Jul 07 1994 14:3046
    The following reply has been contributed by a member of our community
    who wishes to remain anonymous.  If you wish to contact the author by
    mail, please send your message to ROWLET::AINSLEY, specifying the
    conference name and note number. Your message will be forwarded with
    your name attached  unless you request otherwise.

    Bob - Co-moderator DIGITAL

==============================================================================

    Attempting to return from the "how do I print" rathole to the points in
    the document...

re .24:

    >Although Greg's reportage is goading, the points are right-on.  Greg
    >was probably trying to be provocative and he succeeds.

    Provocative in what way?  From here in the area where Greg was it
    looked like he was EXTREMELY understated and I suspect picked only a
    VERY FEW examples of the many that were available.  I didn't see
    anything that appeared to be geared specifically to arouse
    resentment...

re .25:

>    I found the document to be depressing.  There about 45 pages of well
>    researched and anecdotal items, and a page of recommendations.

    Why depressing?  From what I read, Greg MADE SCANT MENTION of the
    disastrous effect of decisions on the morale of the workforce, the
    effect of putting thousands of people on the street that are ACTIVELY
    competing with the company, the effect of putting thousands of people
    into other companies where they help influence decisions NOT to use DEC
    whenever possible (I suspect many of us have seen specific examples of
    former employees in other companies contacting other former employees
    instead of DEC for consulting), and the negative monetary effect of
    having customers desert us in droves due to lack of confidence, anger
    over decisions of the kind Greg elaborated on, or lack of attention.

    I suspect he could have found many additional, equally if not more
    damning, truly brutal examples of the mistakes, mismanagement, and
    stupidity that have been perpetrated on this company in the past few
    years.


3231.34Ditto .28SUBURB::VEALES::VEALESMore UndercompensatedThu Jul 07 1994 15:061
3231.35what lead us down the rocky path...TOOHOT::LEEDSFrom VAXinated to AlphaholicThu Jul 07 1994 15:5723
re: .6

>On the plus side, i never realized that the BI bus was such a
>negative thing for Digital (but then i never paid that much attention to buses)



I've recently (in 20/20 hindsight) argued that 4 things lead us to the 
state we are in (not in any particular order, although if I thought 
about it enough, I could prioritize):


 - The internal Operating System Wars
 - The BI Bus
 - The dropping of Prism and loss of David Cutler
 - The VAX 9000


When I have more time, I'll explain why I think each of these 
contributed to our condition, but they're probably pretty obvious 
(except for maybe the BI bus).

Arlan
3231.36bingoMROA::MAHONEYThu Jul 07 1994 16:085
    to .35
    
    I agree on all four points.
    
    Ana
3231.37ARCANA::CONNELLYfoggy, rather groggyThu Jul 07 1994 16:4111
re: .35,.36

I would have thought that our loss of the network market and our pricing
practices (based on a proprietary "lock-in" strategy) would be right up
there with the ones you mention.  It also seemed that when we got into the
"enterprise management" area, that had negative consequences (in that our
time-to-market on products got blown way out and we stopped paying attention
to low-end and medium customers).

								- paul
3231.38NWD002::RANDALL_DOThu Jul 07 1994 17:1033
    RE:  .35,.36
    
    I would add that Alpha's success (or, slow ramp up) is as critical a
    factor as the others.  Greg's reasoning, "Why isn't Alpha successful"
    is inadequate.  Stated simply, even after killing Prizm, we could have
    recovered smartly with Alpha.  We have made the transition much more 
    painfully than we could have.  Why?  It's the software, ...
    
    Computers aren't much use without software.  Alpha had to worry about
    moving software across to three new operating systems, or three times
    the work H-P had with PA-Risc.  It took H-P a few years, and we could
    have learned from them.  We just didn't get the software -
    applications, utilities, base software, CASE tools - ported quickly. 
    How could we have done better?  Give money to our ISVs.  Meet their
    needs.
    
    Invest in our partners, show them our commitment to their success on
    Alpha, and they would be much more committed to us.  All they want is
    to run on the best and fastest platform, which is Alpha.  What they
    need is help ($) to port to the new OSs.  Instead, we did it on the
    cheap, providing some seed units, porting centers, etc.  But no
    proactive program to move them over quickly.  Same for our internal
    software.  We have underestimated the cost and effort.
    
    A small point.  Greg is pretty VMS-centric.  It's tough to make an
    argument for VMS on the desktop.  When we were producing DecWrite,
    DecDecision, etc. the world was buying a million copies of Windows per
    month.  We thought they should have been buying VMS instead, because it
    is so superior.  So the world bought WordPerfect, and we produced
    DecWrite.  Listening to the market is very helpful when making product
    decisions...
    
    Don Randall
3231.39QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centThu Jul 07 1994 17:2213
Re: .35

The first point I'll generally agree with.  The second is not really a big
deal.  The third I disagree with completely.  The fourth, well, clearly the
VAX 9000 was too little, too late, but I don't think it had any significant
long-term effect except to serve as the gravestone for LCG.

In my view, the problem has not been any of our products but with our
complete inability to convince customers that they should buy them.  We
never learned how to market products and made it difficult for customers
to buy from us.  Sadly, not much has changed in this area.

					Steve
3231.40STAR::MWOLINSKIuCoder sans FrontieresThu Jul 07 1994 17:4217
    
    
    	Rep .39  Steve
    
    
    >>>VAX 9000 was too little, too late, but I don't think it had any
    significant long-term effect except to serve as the gravestone for LCG.
    
    
    	No way, LCG's gravestone was and still is the Jupiter, the would
     be star that failed to ignite!!! The VAX 9000 finished off what was
     left of the Marlboro Computer Company.
    
    
    	-mike
    
    	<36 bit jedi and jupiter/ni20 microcoder> 
3231.41a billion here, a billion thereMSBCS::BROWN_LThu Jul 07 1994 17:534
    I've seen estimates that hover around $1b lost on the VAX9000 effort,
    but its debateable as whether that had a "significant long-term
    effect".  We also lost about $1b on the DECmate/Rainbow/Pro effort.
    kb
3231.42OKFINE::KENAHEvery old sock meets an old shoe...Thu Jul 07 1994 17:563
    While we were concentrating on beating IBM at its own (mainframe) game,
    they proceeded to outflank us and beat us at our own (minicomputer)
    game.  The AS400 line alone generates more revenue that DEC as a whole.
3231.43ISV EconomicsLJSRV2::FEHSKENSlen - reformed architectThu Jul 07 1994 18:1518
    
    re .38:
    
    >All they want is to run on the best and fastest platform, which is Alpha.
    
    
    Wrong.  All they want is to run on the platform that represents the
    largest revenue opportunity for them.  This means the one with the
    largest installed base (potential installed base if they're willing
    to take risks), the lowest development and marketing cost, the lowest
    unit cost for their product (e.g., license fees), and the highest unit
    price for their product (due to unique value on that platform).
    
    "Best and fastest" enter into their deliberations only to the extent
    that they positively influence this last consideration.
    
    len.
      
3231.44SMOP::glossopKent GlossopThu Jul 07 1994 18:5440
Actually, I would lump the BI, the VAX 9000, and move to direct sales
while the industry was moving to indirect under the heading of "IBM wannbe",
or "trying to grow up, not down", which was one of the real underlying
causes.  We failed to recognize that one of the reasons for earlier
successes were that we were going after new, "wide-open", growing,
low-end (at the time) markets. The real problems started when we utterly
failed to use the profits of the VAX/VMS period to *successfully* invest
in the future and bring new things on-line (*particularly* given that
we were claiming to be a growth company and not having a dividend...)
A boom in revenue can bury several "mis-predicts" if you concentrate
on accelerating the "fixes" after the initial problems are identified.
However, a boom ("success") also makes it all too easy to ignore
failure to invest adequately in the future, or "strategy thrashing".

Another bullet should be the lack of accountability that allowed
(and has continued to allow) bad decisions to continue to be made
without correction.  Making mistakes is expected (though risk absolutely
needs to be managed.)  (You probably aren't learning fast enough if you
never make mistakes - either that or you're *very* lucky...)  Failing
to learn from mistakes and repeating shouldn't be tolerated, however,
and we seem to have a lot of patterns of repeated failure in roughly
similar ways over the last 10 years, suggesting that we are not really
learning (at least as a whole) from our mistakes.  (One symptom of this
is the "strategy thrashing" that has existed since we were unable
to figure out what came after VAX/VMS.  Deciding "not PRISM" may have
been the right thing, since PRISM did in fact have several problems -
mostly having to do with the program, not the hardware design.  However,
the vaccuum and thrashing that existed after that point that caused us
to have a "temporary Unix strategy" of MIPS/Ultrix, then the Ultrix vs
OSF on MIPS fiasco.)

One of the biggest sins (if not the biggest) in not "growing down,
not up" (in terms of system sizes) was not recognizing the shift to PCs,
but instead trying to "look under the street light" for more successes
in "the mid-range" after VAX/VMS, rather than moving with the market
toward smaller machines.  (Many things tend to "grow up" over time as
they gain complexity and baggage.  It takes care to start new things
at "lower levels" than occurred before - at least in the computer
industry where that has been the general trend as minaturization
continues.)
3231.45SMOP::glossopKent GlossopThu Jul 07 1994 19:0313
RE: .43

Absolutely.  Software development follows VOLUME, NOT SPEED.  It gets
really tiresome listing to hardware types rant about DEC software
products being expensive when we can't build volume platforms.
Or about why ISVs won't port when we aren't committed to a volume
platform.  (Jensen doesn't count as a "volume platform" by PC
standards.)

This is how long after the introduction of Alpha?  Can I buy an
Alpha for the same price as a 90-100Mhz Pentium, let alone a real
completely configured volume product like 486 systems at <$1500?
No?  If I'm a software ISV, why should I take Alpha seriously?
3231.46Humbling times...TALLIS::DARCYAlpha Migration ToolsThu Jul 07 1994 20:2016
> - The internal Operating System Wars
> - The BI Bus
> - The dropping of Prism and loss of David Cutler
> - The VAX 9000

    I would also add...
       - (as Kent points out) the failure to recognize the immense
         growth of the PC industry
       - the absence of Digital in developing new operating systems...
         something that we were very good at.
       - and lack of developing key relationships with other
         companies (the Apple/Alpha fiasco e.g.) 
    
    Can we learn from our mistakes?
    
    /George
3231.47Since I lack the time to make it more concise...SMOP::glossopKent GlossopThu Jul 07 1994 21:53181
>       - the absence of Digital in developing new operating systems...
>         something that we were very good at.

I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with this one.  I believe
another symptom of "looking under the street light" is that we
failed to leverage our core competencies by building on them instead
of constantly re-inventing them.  (Capital is only useful if you use
it for something, like earning interest...)  Some internal competition
in a limited form keeps people honest.  Free for alls with several
similar products reaching the market do nothing but confuse customers
and diminish our market presence for any one.

The Alpha software strategy is unfortunately a good example of this -
we have 3 shipping "major" operating systems, plus several others
in the pipe (or maybe even shipping - I don't know offhand).  The problem
is that ISVs don't see "one platform with several OSes" (the hardware
view) - they see "several platforms" (the application and end user view,
not the chip manufacturer's narrow view).

Take a look at growing, or recently growing, companies or markets.

    - PCs.  One API (originally DOS, but moving to Windows).  Application
      devos see ONE ABI platform: Intel using the Windows interface -
      for Windows, Windows/NT and OS/2.  Intel, MS, Compaq, Gateway 2000,
      Packard Bell, many many software developers, etc., are all
      prospering as a result of this large (and growing) market.

    - Apple.  One OS, one hardware platform (trying to make a change
      to a new platform, but the long term focus is still a single
      software/hardware combination, unlike Digital which has no clear
      statement on an operating system environment.)  (Even with this
      focus, Apple is likely facing a very difficult transition because
      of it's "closed" software practices.)

    - HP.  One "strategic" OS, plus a non-strategic older one.  One
      hardware platform (with a future migration annouced.  Note that
      the annoucement - with Intel - was designed to make it clear that
      they were trying to increase their long-term market by partnering
      with someone with a much higher volume, not trying to "keep it
      to themselves".)

    - Sun.  One OS, one hardware platform (trying to migrate to a similar
      OS, and planning to migrate to a new hardware platform, but still
      a single long-term design center.  They haven't really figured
      out how to cope with PCs - partly because they are committed
      to a single software system, and the definition of what makes
      a PC a PC is a different software system.)

Motorola is a good example of a company that had "several" markets
(68k/Apple, 68k/Unix systems).  Only one really had close to critical
mass and it was marginal.

ISVs decide who is going to make them money today and tomorrow.  That
means where are they going to get volume today and tomorrow.  Marketing
can ease product transition pain (as can a good economy).  Lack of it
can be a serious problem too...  Note, however, that Digital isn't
(other than by neglect, anyway) migrating any of the 3 OS customer
bases to the other OSes.  From the ISV viewpoint that means 3 markets,
not one 3x the size migrating to another 3x the size (which would be
the case if we were following a single OS strategy.)

Note that Intel is basically a one-application-binary company.
Non-DOS/Windows systems do exist for Intel, but they are a minute
fraction of PC sales.  (Intel would be in deep trouble if they
had to rely on non-DOS, moving to non-Windows, to generate sales
for 486/Pentium chips...)

Digital is taking a small market as far as ISVs are concerned (Alpha
binary compatible) and splitting it n ways, with each element being
part of a plurality.  ISVs that were willing to tolerate the size
of the VMS market may come along for the ride, but it isn't clear
that ISVs will have much interest in markets this size for the long
haul.

Basically, Intel and Microsoft are parts of a much larger market, while
Digital is "all" of several smaller markets, all of which are defacto
currently "closed" architecturally (since no significant vendors have
been willing to buy into Alpha so far.)

I agree with the comment on making alliances (though I would much
prefer to be another member of a market rather than a member of an
"alliance", based on industry history of alliances, since markets
normally have several parallel producers, while "alliances" tend
to imply single-provider, which is just a larger version of "we want
it all" that happens to be shared across company boundaries, and
that tends to lead to higher prices, etc...)  However, consider
that Apple would be yet another ABI and would do absolutely nothing
in terms of increased market share for any one of the other Alpha ABIs
(so ISVs see "yet another port that costs money for a small market",
rather than "more platform sales in the SAME market.)  It might help
chip sales, but even then, it would continue to send a confusing message
about future direction.

FWIW - Power PC is quite possibly making the same mistake.  Apple will
use the chips, but that does nothing to make a real dent in the Intel
PC base, particularly given that Apple and IBM don't seem to be willing
to buy into a common system design (which means that 3rd party hardware
manufacturers are stuck with the same problem as 3rd party software
manufacturers - higher costs and a partitioned market.)

Digital already sees this in a weakened "universal platform" message
as well.  (Want to run NT?  Want a workstation-class machine to leverage
that performance Alpha is supposed to give you?  Sorry...  Yes, it's
supposed to be changing, but it's taking a LONG time...)

So, what can we learn?

    - Successful vendors are dealing in non-fragmented markets.  (Read:
      They have a strategic focus on a single "platform" at any point
      in time - which *includes* software considerations, though
      the platform may migrate over time [with some serious danger
      at the transition points, even if compatibility is VERY strong].
      Basically, they aren't "conglomerates" from a software perspective.)

    - Successful vendors are actively taking actions to try to increase
      the size of their long-term markets.  (One of the reasons I believe
      Sun is going to run into problems is that it's behaving the same
      way did with VAX/VMS - "we want to own everything".)

    (FWIW - IBM is in basically the same boat as Digital.)

One question that Digital should be thinking very hard about now, presuming
it is going to continue with Alpha:

    - What are we going to do to get a large market that will
      be attractive to ISVs?

	This probably means:

	    - Focus on one software platform noticably beyond others.
	      This is necessary to have a chance of having at least
	      one system the market will accept.

	    - Try to sell the idea of *that platform* (not just the Alpha
	      architecture) to others.  (i.e. you're trying to convince
	      people there's a market for "Macs" - software and hardware -
	      NOT a "market for 68000s", which is what our currently
	      "strategy" is.)

	    - Providing and getting ISV software developers to buy into
	      the platform in the early stages.

	Part of the problem is that emphasizing one is really tricky
	business, and we're worried we're going to piss off even more
	customers that we already have (a very real concern).  Unfortunately,
	we're sort of like someone part way across a street.  Darting
	in front of an on-rushing car in the other lane (telling customers
	we're going to do something different) to get across is very
	dangerous.  However, it's the only way to get to the other side
	and out of the lane we're standing in - which also has on-coming
	cars...  (i.e.  It's not a stable situation, and there isn't
	necessarily any smooth/safe transition to get there from here.
	Unfortunately, because of operating results, quarterly knee-jerk,
	and investor response, it would be extremely difficult to even
	convince people to try to do anything "long term globally optimal"
	that was at all less "locally optimal".)

  	However, we keep telling people what businesses we're not in,
	combined with the current 3 OS strategy, it isn't clear that
	ISVs are going to be there to "take up the slack" where Digital
	used to invest in software.  (We were willing to force our
	software to be "hardware slaves" and charge high prices to
	compensate for small market share.  ISVs are likely to view
	the opportunity cost as being considerably higher without
	volumes being there.  Unlike Digital software, they aren't
	captive and can "just say no" if they don't believe things
	are going to be directly beneficial to them, and more beneficial
	than any other alternatives they might have chosen...)

This (single "platform" strategy) is still fundamentally a hardware
strategy rather than a software one, and is still very likely to fail
(IMHO) unless a lot of software investment is made "up front" so that
it lowers the cost of people moving to the platform.

Unfortunately, this is all something that should have been done several
years ago, and in addition, the hardware for the platform should reflect
the market.  (A Pentium plug-compatible chip with a PC box as a standard
platform would reflect market reality in terms of gaining market share.
For a variety of reasons, that isn't likely to happen...)

As it stands, we've have a hand, and we've got to play it...
3231.48Imagine the possibilities of a faster ATMHLDE01::VUURBOOM_RRoelof Vuurboom @ APD, DTN 829 4066Fri Jul 08 1994 06:0323
Re: .-1
    
    Good Points, Kent
    
>This (single "platform" strategy) is still fundamentally a hardware
>strategy rather than a software one, and is still very likely to fail
>(IMHO) unless a lot of software investment is made "up front" so that
>it lowers the cost of people moving to the platform.

    ...and promotes the benefits of moving to that platform. Supposing
    your bank sent you advertising with "Imagine the possibilities of
    a faster ATM". (1) You have better things to do than go around
    imagining possibilities and (2) you basically don't care as long
    as it gets the job done. Make the obvious substitutions and you
    have our average (target) customer.
    
    We should be pushing, promoting and emphasizing application
    strategies. Highlight those applications that can do things
    with 64 bits that 32 bits would not allow for example. If your
    bank ever gets a faster ATM you bet they would advertise at
    the improved service (application) level.
    
    re roelof
3231.49TALLIS::DARCYAlpha Migration ToolsFri Jul 08 1994 14:3621
>>       - the absence of Digital in developing new operating systems...
>>         something that we were very good at.
>
>I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree with this one.  I believe
>another symptom of "looking under the street light" is that we
    
    The point I wanted to make is that Digital certainly had the talent
    to develop a windows-oriented operating system for the low-end.  We let
    drop many years ago what I considered one of our best "core competencies".
    This was probably due to our successes with VMS, the fact that we
    were a VAX driven company and we didn't do PCs well.
    
    Customers are now throwing money at Microsoft like they once did at
    Digital.  Though the Windows API will live on for some time, new
    operating systems and APIs will be (are being) developed.  Digital 
    has instead decided to ride the waves of other companies inventions
    (e.g. NT).
    
    Unfortunately, we don't control the rudder anymore.
    
    /George
3231.50beware sweeping generalizationAZTECH::RANCEFri Jul 08 1994 15:5230
    
    
    re: .43
    
    
        >All they want is to run on the best and fastest platform, which is
        >Alpha.
    
    
        >Wrong.  All they want is to run on the platform that represents the
        >largest revenue opportunity for them.
    
    
    	well, this second claim may be true in the commercial sector but
    not everywhere.  i spent 3.5 years on a customer site where they do
    high energy physics research (CERN) and that customer wanted to buy
    from whomever was selling the most computes the cheapest.  they had
    a $ per MIP ratio that guided all purchases.  no matter how many
    computes you gave them, they could use them all and more.  this was the
    death of VAXen at their site.  DECstations were a big step forward,
    however, and now alpha is even better.
    
    in alot of cases academic and research institutes merely need a
    high-powered cpu and an operating system.  alot of the rest of the
    software is their own and they'll be doing the port.
    
    mark
     
    
    
3231.51ISVs are not End UsersLJSRV2::FEHSKENSlen - reformed architectFri Jul 08 1994 16:016
    
    re .-1 - the discussion wasn't about end users, it was about ISVs.
    End user motivation is indeed different from ISVs' motivation. 
    
    len.
    
3231.53I looked and found...DV780::VIGILWilliams VIGIL, y que mas?Sat Jul 09 1994 18:476
When I printed my copy, it died about halfway through.  I scanned the .ps
file with an editor looking at the point where it died.  On line had had
a <CR> apparently inserted in the middle of it.  When I corrected that line,
the whole document then printed fine.

Ws
3231.54Was he an engineer?ASABET::LONDONMon Jul 11 1994 13:588
    The paper was very interesting - I have only worked here for 2 years
    and didn't know a lot of the details.
    
    Were there any other marketing blunders?  I always here how bad
    marketing is but - anything huge?  Sometimes I felt that this paper had
    an engineering slant.
    
    
3231.55an Excellent Technical ConsultantTROOA::PBLANEYExplanations take too long Mr.NikeMon Jul 11 1994 20:596
    Greg was a Software Consultant in Sales Support, sometimes Digital
    Consulting (when it was EIS), and a leading VMS Partner. He was well
    known to Senior management when KO was in charge. His final job at
    Digtial was working for MCS (I believe).
    
    -pb
3231.56Info about the author?TLE::PERIQUETDennis PeriquetTue Jul 12 1994 13:584
    
    Was Greg layed-off?  Did he quit after some amount of frustration?  The
    paper seemed to have a tone of a certain amount of frustration.
    
3231.57HAAG::HAAGRode hard. Put up wet.Tue Jul 12 1994 16:2820
    i suppose i know greg as well as any deccie. .55 is right. greg was a
    long time VMS consultant and spent lots of time in most of the
    technical field organizations over the years - sales support, eis, dc,
    whatever. there have been so many.
    
    and greg was tfso'd in january. he is not bitter about it and is doing
    quite well on his own. i don't want to put words in his mouth but what
    he is bitter about is (IMHO) the demise of a once great company. a
    demise that seems hell bent to a final bitter conclusion. and as it
    gets worse it seems that less and less input from average working folks
    is asked for. and those that offer it are ignored and sometimes
    retaliated against. lets not deny that THAT happens. 
    
    greg, and to a lesser extent myself, have never been afraid to speak up 
    when things are wrong or unfair. and for both of us, perhaps more so for 
    greg, it has been oh so painful to watch DEC consume itself from within.
    
    greg never stopped believing that he could help save DEC from DEC. i
    learned a couple of years ago that i couldn't help save DEC from DEC.
    hell, i may not even be able to save me from DEC. greg didn't. 
3231.58Cheers to Greg...SNOC02::HAGARTYDMein Leben als HundThu Jul 14 1994 00:2428
3231.59Not Successful, But Not For That ReasonLJSRV2::FEHSKENSlen - reformed architectThu Jul 14 1994 16:1318
    
    re .58 - EMA (the architecture) cost less than $1M.
             DECmcc (the product) cost about $50M.
    
    At the time we abandoned DECmcc, it apparently had about as many
    licenses as the equivalent HP OpenView product.  DECmcc "failed"
    because it was implemented to manage DECnet from VAX/VMS systems,
    when the world wanted to manage TCP/IP and NetWare networks from
    UNIX systems and PCs.  DECmcc also took about twice as long to
    implement as it should have.  The final nail in DECmcc's coffin was
    OSF's repudiation of it as the basis for the OSF DME, though OSF was
    never able to provide the promised DECmcc-equivalent DME.
    
    It didn't have to be this way.  The failure of DECmcc and the EMA
    program had nothing to do with emulating IBM.
    
    len.
     
3231.60BABAGI::MCNANEYThis note's for youThu Jul 14 1994 18:055
>>    Now all we have to do is sell of the few remaining jewels to the debt
>>    collectors to keep the executive salaries going for a couple more
>>    years, and we can close up shop
    
    agreed.
3231.61CSC32::M_EVANSskewered shitakeFri Jul 15 1994 15:2537
    At the risk of really stirring the pot here, the problem with MCC from
    the point of view of the customers I work with, was a very
    unresponsive engineering group that felt it could tell the customer
    what he or she wanted.  Instead of bugfixes, there were release notes
    which told people what they couldn't do.  Escalations for fixes were
    largely ignored and if addressed the bug-fixes never made it into TIMA,
    so the CSC wound up having to CLD many customer's for the same problem.
    At the same time the notesfiles said that the CSC's had the patches
    for the problems so the poor field people were also caught in the
    middle and Peeved at the CSC.  Remeber people, We are not supposed to
    send out patches which have not been through the TIMA process.

    We still have customers who use DECmcc and are NOT happy with the
    decision to abandon it, but will need to because engineering hasn't
    completed making mcc compatabile with 6.0 or 6.1, and there is no
    apparent plan to keep up with 6.2 and up.  This is a real shame because
    Polycenter NWM 400 actually was usable; many of the bugs had been
    fixed and customer issues addressed.  In fact there are several large
    companies still using it who emphatically have said they will look at
    other companies' network management problems before they will migrate
    to netview and a new OS for their managment stations.

    My feeling form a squeezed-in-the-middle specialist was that:

    1.  This was a group that was and till is totally out of control from a
    quality stand point.

    2.  I am hoping but not too confident that moving the maintainability to
    another part of the world will improve responsiveness for our customer    base.

    3.  That maybe senior leaders should ask the customer's, specialists
    and others what went wrong from our perspective and LEARN from the
    experience as I am sure this engineering group is not the only group to
    refuse to use TIMA to avoid reinventing the wheel on customer issues


3231.60
3231.62Too True, But It's Water Over The BridgeLJSRV2::FEHSKENSlen - reformed architectFri Jul 15 1994 15:316
    
    re .61 - you'll get no argument from me about anything you've said. 
    Your remark about "out of control" is on the mark.
    
    len (former lead architect of the EMA program).
    
3231.64Wonder if they shut off the lights when they left!MPGS::CWHITEParrot_TrooperSat Jul 16 1994 14:568
    you mean the technical information management architecture?  It still
    lives, I believe, but all the people that managed, added information
    to, and generally 'ran' it have been TFSO'd......I know several. There
    are documents that describe it in detail. The person I would have sent
    you to for information was also TFSO'd........So why not go to the
    top!  Ask Al Snyder at the CXO Country club.
    
    chet
3231.65TENNIS::KAMKam USDS (714)261-4133 (DTN 535) IVOSat Jul 16 1994 15:3211
    re .63
      For additional information:
    	Conference is at TINCUP::TIMA
 	Barbara Gilbert,TIMA::GILBERT                           
 	European TIMA Operations & Support Services in France.
    
    The support people in STOW, Barbara Pattenden in particular, was part 
    TFSO'd last time around.  There is no one to answer questions in the US
    anymore, that I know of.
    

3231.67MSDOA::SCRIVENMon Jul 18 1994 13:069
    There are still Service Delivery engineers using this and are quite
    capable of answering any question.  Call Dan Kimble, he's out of the
    Tallahassee FL office.  He's one of the guru's (so I'm told) and does a
    lot of training with the other SD Engineers.  I know there is a tool
    that will be utilized thru TIMA to support engineering changes to
    installed based, but who knows.....
    
    Toodles.....JP
    
3231.68TINCUP::KOLBEWicked Wench of the WebMon Jul 18 1994 20:439
I used to do TIMA support in the US for the program office
but we were pretty much shut down nearly a year ago. The
Digital Expertise Center supports the US area hubs but they
just laid off the person who did most of the work on TIMA.

The CVC has said they are using TIMA as the information storage 
for Knowledge Aquifer. Don't know who they expect to run it but
I hear they have 80 people sitting around thinking about it.
liesl
3231.69RUSURE::EDPAlways mount a scratch monkey.Tue Jul 19 1994 14:5279
    Re .61:
    
    Given your description of the field and my view of engineering, I don't
    think the problem is the workers in either group.  Here's the situation
    I think Digital has placed us in:  We're overloaded.  The reason
    engineering doesn't respond to escalations for many fixes is that we
    only have enough people to work on the very highest priority
    complaints.
    
    Complaints are not necessarily the same as problems -- in one recent
    CLD, the customer complained that their system's interval timer was
    losing too much time, replacing it had made it a little more accurate
    but not enough, they wanted to use their Alpha system has a time server
    but wouldn't explain why another system wouldn't do, et cetera.  I
    requested that they accurately measure the time drift over a week. 
    They did and found that the system was within specification.  Case
    closed.  This is a problem that should have been solved in the field. 
    But it appears to us in engineering that many of the people in the
    field who could deal with technical issues are gone.  I suppose the
    field is as overloaded as we are.
    
    Even if the problem were not solved, it should never have been
    escalated.  Our priorities are set all wrong, and explaining that to
    management doesn't help.  They are running around following "process". 
    That's their product -- they make it, and it is their jobs.  The
    "process" allowed that CLD to be incorrectly escalated and to pre-empt
    my time from real problems.  Management should have realized, or
    allowed engineering to decide, that the problem should not have been
    escalated.  But it's more important to management here that we get good
    numbers on their CLD reports.  Those numbers are based on arbitrary
    standards that don't even indicate how good a job we are doing of
    handling CLDs -- and they don't include ANY consideration for how well
    we are serving the customer or whether we are producing a quality
    product.
    
    .61 says that response from engineering is difficult to get.  It's the
    same way here in engineering -- response from the field is difficult to
    get.  I've got one patch I've sent to about ten people.  Only one of
    them has reported back to me.  I need that feedback to know that the
    patch does what it is supposed to (or that it does not); I can't submit
    it to the pool until then.  But the field is not responding.  For
    another CLD, I made the mistake of preparing three versions of a
    program, in a sequence of increasing measures to fix a problem, and
    giving all three versions to the field at once.  I figured that was
    efficient.  The customer tried out the new program and eventually
    reported that the problem had gone away.  But the field hasn't told me
    which version of the program was used.  I have asked three times. 
    Again, I need that information to submit the patch to the pool.
    
    I don't know what's going on out there.  I suppose the field is as
    overloaded as engineering.  But whatever the reason, engineering and
    the field are not working together.  The company is too fragmented.
    
    I've never even heard of TIMA.  We've got a process for getting patches
    into the official pool, but it's bogged down in excessive bureaucracy
    without appropriate engineering consideration.  I suggested some
    changes for it, urged my supervisor to bring them up, submitted them to
    the committee, and even screamed about it.  That brought them to the
    attention of my group manager, who agreed they were good suggestions
    and told my supervisor and others to go ahead and consider them.  But
    nothing's happened.  Management fell right back into its regular
    process, always busy but never accomplishing much.  We would be better
    off abolishing the committee and letting one good responsible engineer
    decide what goes into the pool.
    
    But there's no way to make that happen.  Digital's lost its sense of
    doing the right thing.  Employees aren't rewarded for doing the right
    thing, being productive, or helping the company or the customer.  We're
    foundering.  The workers here are overloaded and uninspired to make
    things better.
    
    
    				-- edp
    
    
Public key fingerprint:  8e ad 63 61 ba 0c 26 86  32 0a 7d 28 db e7 6f 75
To get PGP, FTP /pub/unix/security/crypt/pgp23A.zip from ftp.funet.fi.
For FTP access, mail "help" message to DECWRL::FTPmail or open Upsar::Gateways.
                                          
3231.70DEC STD 204VMSVTP::S_WATTUMOSI Applications Engineering, WestTue Jul 19 1994 15:3213
>    I've never even heard of TIMA.  We've got a process for getting patches
>    into the official pool, but it's bogged down in excessive bureaucracy
>    without appropriate engineering consideration.

Wow.  All I have to do is build my ECO kit; fill out two fairly simple
online forms, and send a three line Email message to the DEC STD 204
people.  If everything was OK, usually within 1 week I get confirmation back
from someone in the Colorado Customer Support Center that everything made it
into TIMA, and they even provide useful feedback on how to make my ECO kit
better the next time around - or, if it has serious problems, they let me know
what the issues are, and suggest a fix.

--Scott
3231.71TIMA - KAASABET::LONDONTue Jul 19 1994 17:3920
    Michel Brassart - The Knowlege Aquifer Manager - initiated TIMA 
    
    2 members of that team work in CVC
    
    I saw TIMA in action and was quite impressed.
    
    For example--
    
    If a sales person wanted a reference site he could type the words
    
    Reference, Alpha OSF, Manufacturing, shop floor, ASK
    
    All matches would come up.
    
    Compared to using VTX or IR - This is extremely user-friendly.
    
    TIMA will not be the KA/CVC search and retrieval mechanism because 
    they want new products to be windows based.
    
    
3231.72cautionLGP30::FLEISCHERwithout vision the people perish (DTN 297-5780, MRO3-3/L16)Tue Jul 19 1994 18:2631
re Note 3231.71 by ASABET::LONDON:

>     TIMA will not be the KA/CVC search and retrieval mechanism because 
>     they want new products to be windows based.
  
        In any such discussion, it is important to distinguish at
        least three different things:

        1) the information collection and organization activity --
        TIMA, to my knowledge, is mostly this.

        2) the physical storage and retrieval mechanism. 
        Client-server has been with a lot longer than some seem to
        recognize, so this component may be quite separate from the
        user interface.

        3) the user interface or desktop-client software through
        which access is made by the user.

        If it is decided that "new products to be windows based" (I
        assume MS Windows) then only the third item must be changed.

        In particular, using WWW (World-Wide Web) gateway technology,
        you can provide access to the back-end data from any desktop
        supported by Web browsers (and all common platforms are
        supported) using a single gateway implementation.

        What we don't need are new projects to build single-purpose
        desktop clients.

        Bob
3231.73Tima/KAASABET::LONDONTue Jul 19 1994 18:3710
    I am unsure that your 1,2,3 list is correct.
    
    If you want, I will connect you with the right people to have this
    discussion.
    
    Someone told me that windows is a major reason it is not being used.
    
    There are a couple of others I have been told.  
    
    Michael
3231.75TIMA/StarsAIAG::WISNERPaul Wisner, TIMA/Stars V3.0 Development, Multivendor Customer ServicesTue Jul 19 1994 22:469
1. TIMA and STARS are being integrated into a single environment under
   DCE, providing access to remote repositories.

2. A TIMA/Stars UI clients are being developed for Windows, Motif, 
   character cell terminals and (read-only) via Mosiac.

3. TIMA/Stars engineering has not been hit too hard by TSFO.

4. TIMA/Stars is currently a critical part of MSC's information architecture.
3231.76more info about STARS & TIMA engineeringAZTECH::ALVEYAny sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from aWed Jul 20 1994 02:5936
    STARS is the information retrieval system that is used by the customer
    support centers and other service organizations and sites to store and
    retrieve articles, program examples, patches, etc.  It has been in
    use by these organizations for about 8 years.  TIMA came into
    existence about 6 years ago and was originally a wrapper around
    STARS that provided user profiling and a more organized method of
    article distribution from one TIMA/STARS site to another.  It has
    grown over the years, but STARS is still the heart of its information
    retrieval.
    
    Originally, TIMA and STARS were developed by two separate groups but
    have been recently combined into 1 engineering effort spread across
    3 geographic locations (Colorado Springs, Marlboro, & Valbonne).
    
    STARS V2.6-1 and TIMA V2.4 are in field test at the moment and will
    be released to the field shortly.  A joint TIMA/STARS V3 product is
    under development.
    
    I have written an HTTP server for STARS V2.6 and I have it currently
    running on our development system.  If you have access to Mosaic or
    to Lynx, you can access it at url http://aztech.cxo.dec.com:1999/stars
    
    I'm currently field testing the STARS http server, but it does access
    all the production databases.  So all the articles, etc. available to
    the service specialists are also available through that server.  Try
    it out if you get a chance.
    
    Also, if you are interested in the STARS search engine for your
    customers, Target Systems Corporation (33 Boston Post Road West,
    Marlboro, MA 01752 (508)460-9206 Fax (508)481-9187) is an authorized
    reseller of STARS under their product name of Target->Smart Search.
    Digital gets money for every copy they sell.
    
    - Bryan Alvey
      STARS (& now TIMA v3) Development
      Colorado Springs
3231.77PERLE::glantzMike, Paris Research Lab, 776-2836Wed Jul 20 1994 08:165
.75> 2. A TIMA/Stars UI clients are being developed for Windows, Motif, 
.75>    character cell terminals and (read-only) via Mosiac.

I'm curious: why read-only Mosaic? Why develop other UI clients? What
is lacking in Mosaic/Lynx?
3231.78KERNEL::JACKSONPeter Jackson - UK CSC IM groupWed Jul 20 1994 11:417
>I'm curious: why read-only Mosaic? Why develop other UI clients? What
>is lacking in Mosaic/Lynx?

    One of my co-workers uses a Braille display that emulates a VT420, thus
    requiring a character cell display.
    
    Peter
3231.79PERLE::glantzMike, Paris Research Lab, 776-2836Wed Jul 20 1994 12:255
>a Braille display that emulates a VT420, thus
>requiring a character cell display.

I don't understand. Lynx is character cell. Again my question: What is
lacking in Lynx/Mosaic?
3231.80Stateless and security freeAZTECH::RANCEWed Jul 20 1994 13:5711
    
    There are certain security issues that mosaic does not address that
    preclude it being the end-all interface for this tool.  also, by virtue
    of the connectionless nature of mosaic links, it is not possible to
    maintain any "state" information for a given user on a given link and
    so the fact that in STARS a user can do a query and then a
    subsequent subquery, the loss of state germane to the initial query
    results is one example of one of the problems with the mosaic interface.
    
    mark
     
3231.81access problemHANSBC::BACHNERTwo beer or not two beer.. (Shakesbeer)Wed Jul 20 1994 14:1118
3231.82AZTECH::ALVEYAny sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from aWed Jul 20 1994 14:1412
    re: .80
    
    The problem specified in .80 is a tough one.  I was able to solve the 
    state problem by passing what I call 'session information' in the url.
    
    Security is an issue though since currently there is no guarantee that
    who the server thinks it talking to is actually who it is talking to.
    Someone could steal the 'session id' that is passed in the url and
    use the same remote host name, and then break in and gain access to
    articles they might not be allowed to view.
    
    - Bryan
3231.83its back upAZTECH::ALVEYAny sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from aWed Jul 20 1994 14:177
    It went down yesterday when aztech crashed and it didn't come back up
    automatically.  I have just restarted it.  So give it another try.
    If you have any problems with it, please send mail to aztech::alvey
    since I don't frequent this notes file very often (its too damn
    depressing, in my opinion).
    
    - Bryan
3231.84up and runningHANSBC::BACHNERTwo beer or not two beer.. (Shakesbeer)Wed Jul 20 1994 18:015
Re: .83

Thanks, I can access aztech now.

Hans.
3231.85AZTECH::ALVEYAny sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demoWed Jul 20 1994 19:2312