[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

2571.0. "Layered Product" by CSSE::ATHOMAS () Wed Jul 07 1993 11:48

    Would someone please tell me what a "layered product" is. If it's
    software, why don't we call it that? Is "layered product" a DEC term?
    What's the meaning behind "layered product?"  
    
    Thanks.
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2571.1SUBURB::THOMASHThe Devon DumplingWed Jul 07 1993 12:025
	It's layered on the operating system, between the operating system,
	and the software that the user uses.

	Heather
2571.2SDSVAX::SWEENEYYou are what you retrieveWed Jul 07 1993 12:4420
    It is "DEC" jargon not used elsewhere in the industry, or at least not
    in the DEC sense.

    "Layered product" is synonymous with (but not precisely meaning) "not
    an operating system".
    
    There are a few products which are not "layered" but also not
    "operating systems" like diagnostic software.
    
    There are "layered products" which have dependencies on other "layered
    products" like some RDB tools that require DEC RDB.
    
    The distinction "layered product" is also used to separate components
    that are shipped with the operating system from operating-system-like
    components which are sold apart from the operating system.
    
    For an example of the former, VMSmail is not a layered product for
    historical reasons, it's included in VMS.  For an example of the
    latter, OSF Motif for OpenVMS is a layered product for licensing
    reasons.
2571.3WHO301::BOWERSDave Bowers @WHOWed Jul 07 1993 13:259
    If I remember correctly, in the early VAX/VMS days the term "layered
    product" also distinguished between native-mode VAX software and
    compatibility-mode stuff.
    
    I remember, as a customer, being a tad confused as to why the COBOL and
    FORTRAN compilers qualified for layered product discounts, but BASIC
    didn't.
    
    \dave
2571.4QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centWed Jul 07 1993 14:375
There was no distinction regarding compatibility mode vs. native.  Simply
put, "layered product" was a term invented by VMS Development to mean any
software product they didn't produce.

					Steve
2571.5Layered != unbundledTLE::AMARTINAlan H. MartinWed Jul 07 1993 16:3115
Re .2:

>    The distinction "layered product" is also used to separate components
>    that are shipped with the operating system from operating-system-like
>    components which are sold apart from the operating system.
>    
>    For an example of the former, VMSmail is not a layered product for
>    historical reasons, it's included in VMS.  For an example of the
>    latter, OSF Motif for OpenVMS is a layered product for licensing
>    reasons.

Around here, the terms "bundled/unbundled" have been used to distinguish
software which is shiped with the base O/S from that which is packaged
separately.
				/AHM
2571.6HDLITE::ZARLENGAMichael Zarlenga, Alpha P/PEGWed Jul 07 1993 20:187
.2> It is "DEC" jargon not used elsewhere in the industry, or at least not
.2> in the DEC sense.
    
    Microsoft uses the same "jargon" when talking about software layered on
    top of NT, and the term means exactly what it does to DEC.
    
    Check out Inside WIndows NT by Helen Custer, the chapter on networking.
2571.7ODIXIE::RHARRISBowhunters never hold back!Wed Jul 07 1993 20:258
    Selling services, "layered product" means any software application
    other than the o/s (vms, ultrix etc) running on the system.  Pathworks,
    basic, cobol, fortran, rdb, vaxset, blah blah blah are all layered
    products.  And then you have to sell them update services along with
    with lps.
    
    bob
    
2571.8we take our jargon with usCVG::THOMPSONRadical CentralistThu Jul 08 1993 13:0113
    
>.2> It is "DEC" jargon not used elsewhere in the industry, or at least not
>.2> in the DEC sense.
>    
>    Microsoft uses the same "jargon" when talking about software layered on
>    top of NT, and the term means exactly what it does to DEC.
>    
>    Check out Inside WIndows NT by Helen Custer, the chapter on networking.

    Could be all the former Digital (and DEC) people there. Helen Custer
    is a former Digital writer for example.

    			Alfred
2571.9VMS didn't invent EVERYTHING!MKOTS3::BEAUDET_TTom BeaudetThu Jul 08 1993 19:328
I seem to remember "layered products" on the PDP-11 Operating Systems...

I don't think VMS invented THAT!

But then it WAS a looonng time ago...


/tb/