| T.R | Title | User | Personal
Name | Date | Lines |
|---|
| 2564.1 | Go fer it | 16BITS::DELBALSO | I (spade) my (dog face) | Wed Jun 30 1993 21:04 | 3 |
| Hadn't heard it, but that's finally one that "fits", at least.
-Jack
|
| 2564.2 | Palmer's message | DECLNE::TOWLE | | Wed Jun 30 1993 21:31 | 4 |
| I believe the message Palmer gave was there were to be no more
early retirement packages offerred. (but I could be wrong)
-VT
|
| 2564.3 | I'm finally old enough | USCTR1::MMCCALLION | | Thu Jul 01 1993 13:14 | 1 |
| Sign me up. Did you hear if 10yrs is added to the time-in Service?
|
| 2564.4 | | MAGEE::GIBSON | | Thu Jul 01 1993 13:30 | 7 |
| re: -.1
Probably, to make it equitable to the plan from last year.
Linda
Who_is_old_enough_but_about_five_months_short_in_Service
|
| 2564.5 | Rumor too good to be true. | USCTR1::MMCCALLION | | Thu Jul 01 1993 13:38 | 7 |
| Linda,
Tecnically, according to the P&P's when I was hired, I will have worked
for Digital for 20yrs on the 4th of July. Sept. 24th is my anniversary
date... add 10 years to that and retirement looks toooooo good to pass
up. I think there are lots of folks in Digital who would fall into the
45+10 calculations.
|
| 2564.6 | ...... :-( ...... | DECLNE::TOWLE | | Thu Jul 01 1993 15:22 | 5 |
| I turn 45 on Sept. 20, and have 23+ years in Digital, but if this
new SERP package comes up as rumorred, I'm sure there will be a
stipulation in it that will make me NOT QUALIFIED to accept it!!
-VT
|
| 2564.7 | RUMORS | BALMER::CROSBY | | Thu Jul 01 1993 19:41 | 3 |
| You know what they call rumors?
Premature facts
|
| 2564.8 | not true | ICS::DONNELLAN | | Thu Jul 01 1993 21:52 | 1 |
| I've checked this one with personnel. The rumor is not true.
|
| 2564.9 | | CSC32::J_OPPELT | happiness is a having a bad memory | Thu Jul 01 1993 22:35 | 3 |
| And why would personnel (or any official channel) confirm a
rumor -- even if that exact announcement is pending -- until
that event actually got announced?
|
| 2564.10 | | TROPPO::QUODLING | | Thu Jul 01 1993 23:39 | 6 |
| And what makes you think that any part of this corporation, is at all
aware, of the business decisions, motivations or whatever, of any other
part...
Q
|
| 2564.11 | SERP revisited | ICS::DONNELLAN | | Fri Jul 02 1993 02:24 | 19 |
|
RE: LAST TWO.
Points well taken. For some reason, I trust this person. Which is not
to say that he would acknowledge something he was not supposed to.
On the other hand, I do know that such actions are non trivial for
Digital. The groundwork for a SERP must be laid in advance with the
relevant federal agencies; this is not just an internal decision.
I've checked this rumor out each time it has come up, so I write from
the vantage point of someone who would like it to be true.
Unfortunately, it appears that it is not. Note that even in this
file there has been no corroborating evidence. If a rumor is true in
Digital, my experience is that you hear about it from multiple
directions. Are there others who are hearing this rumor? If anyone
else is hearing this one, please share it with us.
|
| 2564.12 | Legal question on SERP's | CSC32::K_HYDE | Say NO to The New World Order | Fri Jul 02 1993 15:10 | 7 |
| Isn't there a legal restriction on SERP's to the effect that a
subsequent SERP with a better benefit package must be offered to
those who, in the past, were offered a SERP with a lesser benefit
package?
Kurt
|
| 2564.13 | y | NETWKS::GASKELL | | Thu Jul 08 1993 18:04 | 6 |
| I guess the content in note 2576 is a clear indication that, if DEC
offeres another SERP it won't be before 1/1/94. Then, if you are
luck you MIGHT or might not get health coverage.
I give up!
|
| 2564.14 | Officially denied? | SANFAN::MORRISJA | Even nostalgia isn't what it was! | Thu Jul 15 1993 19:43 | 5 |
| One thing the military, corporate life in general, and Digital corporate
life in particular has taught me over the years is that you should
never believe any rumor until it has been "officially denied".
Jack
|