[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

2513.0. "Inconsistency in Imagine???" by ELIS::PEGG () Wed May 26 1993 14:52

    The Imagine campaign has started here in Holland in the last few weeks
    with a number of the Imagine slogans headlining advertisments in
    various journals.
    
    What I have noticed is that the 'i' of the keyword 'imagine' is bolded
    in the new burgandy colour and the ad design incorporates somewhere on
    it, 'digital' bolded in burgandy complete with round dots on the 'i's.
    
    What I have noticed however is that the 'i' in 'imagine' has an old
    fashioned square dot!
    
    My questions are:
    
    Is this true elsewhere in the world?
    
    If so, is it intentional?
    
    To me, it gives the impression of inconsistency, especially as the
    rounding of the dots on the 'i's was seen as one of the key changes to our
    sign.
    
    Comment please????
    
    Dave Pegg
     
    P.S. Excuses if this has been spotted before and rectified/explained 
    but I couldn't see any mention of it in previous notes or VTX.
    
    
          
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
2513.1JURAN::GARDNERjustme....jacquiWed May 26 1993 14:596

    The IMAGINE ad looks very much like the AT&T campaign.  Same agency,
    maybe???

    
2513.2round hereLACGID::BIAZZOHow low can we go?Wed May 26 1993 16:352
I just looked (again) at an 11 page spread in the May 17 issue of Digital
News and Review.  The dot over the i in imagine is round.
2513.3Getting there....JGODCL::APETERSTreble without a causeThu May 27 1993 07:0914
2513.4Yep - its roundELIS::PEGGThu May 27 1993 07:297
    Yeah, I checked the Sunday Times from the UK last night and the 'i'
    has a round dot.
    
    This is (thank god) a local mistake which I hope is rectified soon.
    
    Dave
    
2513.5ANNECY::HOTCHKISSThu May 27 1993 11:1520
    Hi Dave,
           You have missed the point and I shall personally take this up
    with Bob.
           In France we have the same mistake BUT we add the killer-put no
    phone numbers or address on the advert.This ensures that anybody who
    finds us is a)probably intelligent b)desperate for something and c)is
    probably not a current client.So at a stroke,we renew our customer base
    for the cost of a very clever ad.
    
    Seriously,though.I think the campaign is good but we miss two key
    points.First,how many employees know?Secondly,what is being done to
    make this a real differentiator in front of customers?
    For example,if we are a company committed to innovative solutions from
    creative people and we are really looking for value added solutions,it
    kind of implies that we should approach clients with a 'what's your
    problem guv'.Seen this happen or do we still tend to come out with
    the'buy xx whilst stocks last' approach
    
    Cheers
    Stuart
2513.6Its been noted...ELIS::PEGGThu May 27 1993 13:3315
    OK  - Panic over.
    
    I have been reliably informed by our PR department that the mistake was
    noticed and it will be corrected in future ads.
    
    Refering to .5 however. Sounds like the ads in France are rather
    obscure! The one I checked in the Sunday Times did have department
    and number to call and the Dutch based ones did have Utrecht's number.
    
    If this note entry is going to dive into impressions of the Imagine
    campaign, so be it. Personally, I'm going to wait until the campaign
    is over, including TV Ads etc before slagging it off......
    
    Dave
      
2513.7FYI, FWIWJGODCL::APETERSTreble without a causeMon Jun 14 1993 09:297