[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

1356.0. "Newspaper Article about E-mail and the Gulf War" by JUMP4::JOY (Get a life!) Fri Jan 25 1991 12:34

    The following article was taken from the Worcester Telegram and Gazette 
on Jan. 24, 1991. Since I have received both Don's and Ed's mail, I thought 
it was interesting to read about it in the local paper. From the quotes, 
its apparent that the writer has actually seen the E-mail since the quotes 
are accurate. Its great promotional info for Digital's networking strength as 
well....too bad this wasn't picked up by the newswire services...


			Computer E-mail Bypasses Censors

By Gerald S. Cohen
Telegram & Gazette
Washington Bureau

Washington - When bombs began dropping last week in Israel, Digital 
Equipment Corp. employee Don Feinberg sat down at his computer and sent 
back an instant message to friends back home about the mood of the 
country.

  Ed Barnard of Minneapolis-based Cray Research Inc. did the same thing 
from Saudi Arabia, one day before the United States launched its air assault on 
Iraq, informing colleagues stateside about rumors of destruction buzzing 
around Dhahran.

RINGSIDE SEAT
  Through electronic mail, or E-mail, Barnard and Feinberg are giving their 
colleagues a ringside seat to the Gulf war. Like the unprecedented live 
television feeds saturating the air waves, E-mail is another example of how 
the computer age is making this war different from any other.

   For those on the mailing list, E-mail helps counter the tight lid the 
Pentagon has slapped on war coverage. As news organizations grouse about 
news censorship, E-mail allows people trapped in a war zone an opportunity 
to deliver firsthand, uncensored impressions of the exploding world around 
them.

  In Barnard and Feinberg's case, their messages appeared on Easynet, 
Digital's in-house electronic mail system for its employees. With its 
100,000 readers, Easynet is the largest non-military computer network of 
its kind in the world (dj - Too bad they call it just an electronic mail 
system!)

50,000 COPIES
  Feinberg initially sent his thoughts to 18 friends. Within 36 hours, 
50,000 copies of his essays had been circulated thoughout the network. 
Nikki Richardson, spokeswoman for the Massachusetts-based computer 
manufacturer, said Barnard's message probably was picked off some public 
electronic mail system by a Digital employee, for whom it was intended, and 
then circulated thoughout Easynet.

  While the network technically is supposed to be used for instant 
communication on corporate matters, Richardson said Digital has no problem 
with Feinberg's use of the system.

EXTRAORDINARY TIMES
  "These, of course, are extraordinary times," she said. "We saw this 
happen during the San Francisco earthquake as well, where people used it to 
say 'We're doing OK'."
  "We've been able to learn about the welfare of our employees around the 
world on these occasions."

  Debra Young, spokeswoman for CompuServe Inc., the world's largest on-line 
computer service, said all of its members have international E-mail access.

  While most of the E-mail correspondence is sent person-to-person, some 
users are posting messages on public electronic bulletin boards accessible 
to all the users. Young said two users in Israel, for example, have posted 
messages offering to contact people in their country for anxious relatives 
or loved ones abroad.

TIANANMEN SQUARE
   During the Tiananmen Square massacre, students studying in the United 
States made extensive use of public E-mail networks such as CompuServe to 
smuggle out information about the riot and its aftermath.

  Feinberg's accounts to his colleagues are especially gripping, while 
Barnard's communications give interesting observations about the wartime 
vulnerabilities of Aramco, the giant oil company for which he is doing 
on-site work.

  On Jan. 15, Barnard described locals' fears of the conflagration that 
would result if Armaco's very large liquified-natural-gas facility at Ras 
Tanura came under enemy missile fire.

'BIT CONCERNED'
  "People are a bit concerned that if Ras Tanura is hit we might damage 
buildings here in Dhahran 60 or 100 miles away."
  According to Barnard, the tanks were supposed to have been drained in 
August to guard against such a danger. Attributing the information to 
"those who should know", he said the tanks were never drained and "it is 
not something to talk about. This area is rife with conflicting reports on 
just about everything."

  Barnard said the Saudi manager of Aramco's plant strongly urged his 
workers not to leave the area because he thought it would cause panic.

OUT OF RANGE
  "He, we hear, is in Jedda, which is out of missile range, but nobody seems 
to believe he is even that close."

  Feinberg recalled that on Jan. 18, the day Iraq lobbed its first Scud 
missile into Israel, he was on guard duty in his small settlement of 50 
villagers. At 2:05 a.m. Israeli time, a siren scream was broadcast over the 
radio, a prearranged signal that the country was under attack.

  "I ran home to wake my wife and children," he wrote. "On the way - all of 
about 300 meters - I saw an enormous flash, which lit up the sky to the 
south of us and I heard a sound like a 16-inch naval gun at a distance of 
kilometers.

  "I guess this was one of the missiles that missed and hit the ground 
doing no damage."

    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1356.1DEC mentionedBOSACT::PIPERFri Jan 25 1991 13:226
    As a matter of fact, there was a story on the national news last night,
    Dan Rather et al, but it was more along the line of the dangers of
    information coming from E-mail.  Digital was mentioned as one of the
    main sources of information regarding what's happening in the Gulf, but
    the reporter was reluctant to share some of the data coming across the
    tubes as he regarded it as "sensitive".  
1356.2This attracts the terrorists' eyesCOVERT::COVERTJohn R. CovertFri Jan 25 1991 15:157
This is very dangerous for our employees.

This is a war, folks.

Articles like this make us targets.

/john
1356.3QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centFri Jan 25 1991 16:045
I saw a mail message indicating that the military had already gotten alarmed
at some war-related posting in a notesfile (I don't think it was the one
being discussed here).  I do share some of John Covert's concern.

				Steve
1356.4VCSESU::MOSHER::COOKDeity for hire...Fri Jan 25 1991 16:086
    
    re: .2
    
    That was my first thought.
    
    /prc
1356.5DramatizationMR4DEC::DIMANFri Jan 25 1991 16:4415
    
    Certainly any E-Mail system is a potential conduit
    of sensitive information - but so are the postal services,
    telephones, fax, and other media.  
    
    I think the news services are absolutely scraping the
    bottom of the barrel to sensationalize and dramatize
    anything they can lay their hands on.
    
    Of course in situations involving personal and national security
    we have to be ultra sensative to what we say, where and
    how we say it.
    
    d
    
1356.6NOTIME::SACKSGerald Sacks ZKO2-3/N30 DTN:381-2085Fri Jan 25 1991 17:1410
There's a lesson to be learned from this.

Don Feinberg sent a mail message to 18 people.  There was no indication
in the message that it was for public consumption.  It was forwarded
around the net, eventually ending up in some widely-read notesfiles.
Part of that message made its way to the newspaper article in the base note.

It seems that some people feel it's OK to forward mail messages unless
"do not forward" is explicitly mentioned.  I'm not convinced that even
a "do not forward" prevents mail from being forwarded.
1356.7This is warLOWELL::KLEINFri Jan 25 1991 17:4621
While you may be right about this EMAIL, etc, activity potentially attracting
terrorist attention, I believe that if you become afraid of this and stop
saying and doing what you believe you should be saying, then you have
already become a victim of terrorism and have nothing more to lose.

Recently I heard a story related to this.  A friend and his family are
planning to fly to California for vacation.  When they reserved their
seats, they requested Kosher meals.  Immediately when the war broke out,
they called and canceled their Kosher meals.  They said to me that they were
afraid that having Kosher meals onboard would draw attention to them and
"heaven forbid" what might happen if their flight were attacked (?) by
terrorists.  They were afraid that their Kosher meals would make them
particularly inviting targets.  They also said that they will not take
any matzo on board with them even though the flight is going to be during
Passover.

In my mind, they are ALREADY victims of terrorism.

Get my drift?

-steve-
1356.8WMOIS::FULTIFri Jan 25 1991 18:218
re: .7

I understand what you are saying but, I see your friends actions as
smart precautions. We are ALL victims of terrorism, are not flights being
delayed? security precautions causing longer waits and lines?

So what are we to do, ignore suggested precautions because we dont want
to be victims?
1356.9But who are we are target ofWESTVW::LEE105 and countingFri Jan 25 1991 18:5817
Does email make us more of a target to terrorism?  I suppose its possible, but
*I think* that's stretching it. If Digital is a target it is because we are
a US based multi-national corporation.

*I* am more worried that the military would decide to censor the networks
because of the ability to circumvent the military censors. And, there is the
possibility that the networks cold be used for propaganda. 

An earlier note brings up the issue of fowarding mail. That is a big issue that
concerns me. The amount of indescriminate email boggles the mind. Rumors fly
through here sooo fast.

And, who released the quotes to the newspaper? Don't the rules of privacy pertain
to email as well as notes?


dave
1356.10We're targets if we try too hard not to be, tooSTAR::BANKSThe Energizer Bunny's UnderstudyFri Jan 25 1991 20:1635
    I think the concerns about "making ourselves targets" are valid ones,
    but there are also other concerns.
    
    If, in the interest of supporting the war, covering my backside, and
    generally keeping a low profile around terrorists, I totally censor my
    genuine interest in what's happening and stop all communications on the
    subject, I've lost my freedom of speech.  True, this is mainly a self
    imposed loss, albeit aided by some severe peer pressure, but it's still
    a goner, and I don't know when it'll come back.
    
    If, for the same reasons, I curtail all my non-essential travel, then
    I've just given away my right to unchecked travel within my country and
    the rest of the free world.
    
    If, for the same reasons, I cease any outward observance of my
    religion, then I've given away my freedom of religion.
    
    We can all hunker down and be good little citizens, being very careful
    to protect the interests of ourselves and our governments, and find
    ourselves having given away all our rights.  Yes, when it's over, we'll
    probably get them back, or we might not.
    
    In the mean time, huddled inside my darkened house (so as not to be
    seen from the air (or from a cruise missile)), watching some
    pre-sifted, pre-digested news substitute on the TV, I find that my life
    can suddenly become very similar to what we accuse life to be like in
    some of those "non-free" countries.
    
    Is it worth it?  Some diligence is prudent, responsible, and perhaps
    necessary.  Going overboard isn't.  I personally don't know where to
    draw that line, and I'm certainly not saying that anyone here has or
    hasn't crossed it - wherever it is. 
    
    But please, PLEASE, let me decide how much of my safety I can or want
    to trade away in the name of preserving my liberty.
1356.11BIGUN::SIMPSONDamn your lemon curd tartlet!Sun Jan 27 1991 03:4911
    re .3
    
    Two notes were deleted from the COMET::DEFENSE_ISSUES conference.  As
    might be expected in a company with as many veterans and active
    reservists as ours, sometimes they talk about things they shouldn't. 
    In this case they revealed sensitive information, although there has
    been no suggestion of malicious intent.
    
    Knowledge is power.  The Easynet might be a great way of disseminating
    knowledge and information, but at the same time thought must be given
    to its potential for harm.
1356.12email to the Gulf troopsMARVIN::COCKBURNMon Jan 28 1991 08:1758
I thought this was relevent for posting here:

    Craig

Article 252 of alt.desert-storm.facts:
From: 2un@mace.cc.purdue.edu (Maverick)
Newsgroups: alt.desert-storm.facts,alt.desert-storm,alt.desert-shield,soc.singles
Subject: Email for U.S. Armed Forces
Reply-To: an851@po.cwru.edu (Goofy)


		*** EMAIL FOR U.S. ARMED FORCES ***

   GEnie is proud to announce "LETTERS FROM HOME" - a program 
allowing families and friends to send FREE electronic mail 
messages to their loved ones serving with the U.S. Armed Forces in 
the Persian Gulf region.

   "LETTERS FROM HOME", offered in cooperation with the U.S. Armed 
Forces, the Saudi-American General Electric Company, GE Rents and 
Pitney Bowes Inc., allows individuals in the United States with 
access to a personal computer and modem to send personal messages 
to loved ones serving in the Persian Gulf region.

   Letters will be sent electronically via GE Information 
Services' worldwide teleprocessing network to GE's local 
telecommunications facility in Saudi Arabia.  The letters will be 
received and printed on computers and printers supplied by GE 
Rents.  The mail will then be folded, inserted and sealed in
envelopes using state-of-the-art equipment provided by Pitney 
Bowes.  The letters will then be given to the U.S. Armed Forces 
for delivery to the designated serviceperson.

   You may access the Letters from Home system by typing the word 
"LETTERS" at any menu prompt.  Non-subscribers can dial any GEnie 
local access telephone number.  Non-subscribers can access Letters 
from Home by typing LETTERS at a U#= prompt.

   To send a Letter From Home, you MUST know the Name & Rank, 
Social Security #, Unit or Ship and APO or FPO of the recipient.  
The Letters From Home system will automatically prompt senders for 
the appropriate information.

   The free "LETTERS FROM HOME" electronic mail service is in 
effect through February 28, 1991.

   The number to find out GeNie's local dialup call (voice)
1-800-638-9636
 
   Type: HHH  to get the U#= prompt.

   Type: LETTERS  to get into the "LETTERS FROM HOME" system.

--
"A freedom of speech is the right  | Internet: an851@po.cwru.edu
 to yell 'THEATRE' in a crowded    |      'Jay Weinshenker'
 fire!"                            | WWIV-Net: User #3 @5200
        -Abbie Hoffman             |            'Goofy'