[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference 7.286::digital

Title:The Digital way of working
Moderator:QUARK::LIONELON
Created:Fri Feb 14 1986
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:5321
Total number of notes:139771

868.0. "VAX : computer or vacuum cleaner" by IND::MISRAHI (This page intentionally left Blank) Thu Jul 20 1989 14:47

    An ad appeared in "Newsday" a NYC/Long Island daily paper.
    The ad was from Sears for a vacuum cleaner "the VAX".
    
    
    Q1. This is, I believe, a British product. Yet the ad indicated that 
        "VAX" was a registered trademark.(It had (R) by the name).
        How can this be ??????
    
    Q2. It states it is "4-in-1" -- sounds awfully close to an office
        automation product we have, perhaps quadrupled in power.
    
    Q3. Regardless of the product, can they advertise this way ?
    
    
        I'm tired about the joke of "the VAX that sucks", please refrain.
    
    
     /Jeff
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
868.1sounds like a topic for MARKETINGCVG::THOMPSONNotes Wars VeteranThu Jul 20 1989 15:1118
    A1: Something doesn't have to be a US product to have a registered
    trademark. Also trademarks in unrelated fields can be pretty close
    to, if not completely, identical. For example, Apple is a trademark
    of both Apple Computer and Apple Records. One is in computers and the
    other is in recording. The British VAX vacuum has been a product a
    long time in the UK. In fact the "joke" 'nothing sucks like a VAX'
    has been used in actual advertising in the UK for some time.

    A2: 4-in-1 is very dissimilar from ALL-IN-1. Of course both phrases
    have been used in advertising for years by a variety of products.
    Context and what product is being discussed are taken into account.

    A3: Why wouldn't they be allowed to advertise this way? No laws are
    being broken. Vacuum cleaners and computers are not all that often
    confused. It's not near as bad as all those people selling digital
    watches is it?

    				Alfred
868.2No sweat!BMT::BOWERSCount Zero InterruptThu Jul 20 1989 15:1311
    Jeff,
    
    Trademarks are routinely registered in any country where you MIGHT want
    to do business.  There are several companies (one on the isle of
    Jersey, if memory serves) that will undertake to maintain world-wide
    trademark registration for clients.  They monitor renewal dates, fees
    and changing laws and bill you for fees paid plus a servicce charge
    based on the number of trademarks and the number of ountries in which
    they are registered.
    
    -dave
868.3Perhaps not a good exampleCHIRPA::SWONGERWhat more could you ask for?Thu Jul 20 1989 16:518
	
	re: Apple trademark

	  I know that Apple Records was suing Apple Computer over
	thsi very thing - can't recall how it turned out, if I ever
	knew.

	Roy
868.4Actually a good exampleCVG::THOMPSONNotes Wars VeteranThu Jul 20 1989 16:5911
	There was a sort of agreement with Apple Computer and Apple Records
	that Apple Computer stay out of the music business. The reason for
	the suit is that Apple Records claims that the latest generation
	of Apples has enough "sound" ability that they can be concidered
	musical instriments and therefor are coming into the music business
	that Apple Records is in.

	So if VAX Vacuums had built in calculators or VAX computers cleaned
	floors things might get tricky. :-)

			Alfred
868.5CSSE32::LESLIEThu Jul 20 1989 21:296
868.6STAR::HUGHESThu Jul 20 1989 21:5618
I think .4 has it right. There has to be the possibility of confusion between
uses of the name 'VAX' before it becomes a problem.

There are other examples of multiple companies using the same name for very
different products. I'm sure I can find lots of stores selling different kinds
of Apple products :-)

re: Apple vs Apple
The version I heard (probably on NPR) was that it was related to the use of a
multicolored apple logo and an apparent agreement on the part of Apple (the
computer co) to stay out of the music co.  Same basic idea though.

As long as we don't make VAX systems that could be mistaken for vacuum cleaners,
it shouldn't be a problem. Remember the DECsystem-2020, 'the mainframe no larger
than a domestic refrigerator', as the slogan had it. It also looked like a
'fridge. Good thing noone makes DECsystem-2020 brand refrigerators....

gary
868.7TIXEL::ARNOLDOne day at a timeFri Jul 21 1989 00:366
.1>                  Vacuum cleaners and computers are not all that often
.1>    confused. 
    
    Alfred, I assume you do not work in marketing?   ;-)
    
    
868.8QUARK::LIONELFree advice is worth every centFri Jul 21 1989 02:585
    When this discussion comes around, as it has many times over the years
    (but not so often as in the past month), I am reminded of "Cadillac"
    brand dog food.
    
    				Steve
868.9More useless triviaBOLT::MINOWPere Ubu is coming soon, are you ready?Fri Jul 21 1989 13:184
Many years ago, I heard that "DEC" was trademarked by "Dairy Equipment
Cooperative" in Iowa.

M.
868.10 COMET::BARRIANOchoke me in the shallow water...Fri Jul 21 1989 14:417
    re.9
   > Many years ago, I heard that "DEC" was trademarked by "Dairy Equipment
   > Cooperative" in Iowa

    Thats udderly ridiculous ;-)
    
    Barry
868.11Check MARKETING notes file...LDP::CURRIEvidi veni scriptiFri Jul 21 1989 15:2713
	RE: all

	Ckeck note 917 in ASIMOV::MARKETING 

	To summarize:  VAX is trademark for Vacuum in UK.  DEC has
	agreement (in UK) since our VAX is not a "competing" product.

	Also some interesting info on who owns ALL-IN-1 vs ALL-IN-ONE and
	why getting the trademarked names correct in documents is so
	blasted important.

later...
 jim
868.12another digression from a ratholeSALSA::MOELLERFri Jul 21 1989 17:3413
    < Note 868.6 by STAR::HUGHES >
>re: Apple vs Apple
>The version I heard (probably on NPR) was that it was related to the use of a
>multicolored apple logo and an apparent agreement on the part of Apple (the
>computer co) to stay out of the music co.  
    
    The multicolored Apple logo is fine with Apple, the Beatles' music
    co.  The recent suit arose because Apple Computer developed some
    music synthesizer boards for the MAC, allegedly violating the long-
    held agreement that Apple Computer would not go into the music biz.
    
    karl

868.13TIXEL::ARNOLDOne day at a timeFri Jul 21 1989 17:567
    re ALL-IN-1 vs ALL-IN-ONE
    
    I was told several years ago that "ALL-IN-ONE" is a popular brand of
    diapers in the UK.  Not *necessarily* a competing product with some
    software of a similar name...
    
    Jon
868.14enter/ratholeMU::PORTERRightward Ho!Sat Jul 22 1989 04:221
    we don't have "diapers" in the UK...
868.15pursue/ratholeBABY::FUSCIDEC has it (on backorder) NOW!Sun Jul 23 1989 01:495
re: .14

Well, here in the States, we don't have "nappies"...

Ray
868.16Let's close this discussionEXIT26::STRATTONI (heart) my wifeSun Jul 23 1989 16:085
        Since the questions in .0 have been answered, and since
        the discussion has moved well away from "the Digital way
        of working", I don't think there should be any further
        replies to this topic.
        
868.17No Nashua VAX sales pending sales trainingTLE::AMARTINAlan H. MartinSun Jul 23 1989 17:5913
Re .0:

The Sears in Nashua's Pheasant Lane Mall was visited on Friday.  The vacuum
cleaner salesman there had only seen a reference to the VAX in some signage
recently.  He said that they aren't [fully?] prepared to sell name-brands yet
(a massive change to Sears' way of doing business which readers are probably
aware of), and he has to attend product familiarization classes before he'll be
prepared to begin selling them sometime in mid-September.

I assume that there will be other brands sold there; otherwise you might say
that he'd be attending a sort of a "VAX University".  It is nice to know that
Sears takes sales training at least as seriously Digital.
				/AHM
868.18It wasn't a VAX at all!VOGON::KAPPLERWhat is this thing called, love?Mon Jul 24 1989 08:3611
    Re: .previous
    
    For the record, the advertising slogan was:
    
    "Nothing sucks like an Electrolux"
    
    Yes, it was for a vacuum cleaner (or a "hoover" as they are often
    called in the UK!)
    
    The derivation to  "... like a VAX" I have only ever seen in Notable
    Persons personal name ........ but if you say it often enough .....
868.192 VAXes for the price of 1!ZPOAC6::HWCHOYand the answer is...FORTY-TWOMon Jul 24 1989 08:523
    Maybe if we can OEM that VAX vacuum cleaner, we could then give 1 away
    for every VAX (maybe VAX 6000 and above), for the cleaning the computer
    room floor, and the insides of printers,... ;?)