| Title: | The Digital way of working |
| Moderator: | QUARK::LIONEL ON |
| Created: | Fri Feb 14 1986 |
| Last Modified: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 5321 |
| Total number of notes: | 139771 |
I've observed ( limited sample ! ) that some notes conferences
have following life cycles,
- pioneer stage
Few enthusiasts start a conference to nourish common interest.
Everything is smooth, easy and fun.
If conference is a success , it grows, grOWS and GROWS and starts
living it's own life. If there are many moderator actions, some
people start asking questions about moderators mandate.
The enthusiasts may feel frustrated, others tell them what is their
creation !
- mature stage
It's difficult to achieve it without common agreement on moderators
and moderation rules. Moderators need to know that they have confidence
of majority of the reader and readers should have confidence in
moderators judgment. Without this consensus, it is difficult to take
any unpopular but necessary actions.
I don't know of any other way then some sort of "popular" vote
to establish this consensus.
DIGITAL is great conference, moderators, especially Tom does
in my opinion an excellent job.
But I admit that "moderator elections" out of the blue was bit
clumsy .-) If there is a need of elections, it should be organized
properly, on the other hand, we could have a "vote of confidence"
straight away.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
****** Call for a Vote of Confidence for DIGITAL's Moderators. ******
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ps.
Of course this ballot should not and is not meant to replace
any discussion of moderator practices, this is why I don't think
you should repost it.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 748.1 | Yes. | BISTRO::WLODEK | Network pathologist. | Sun Mar 12 1989 11:14 | 1 |
| 748.2 | yes | EAGLE1::EGGERS | Tom, VAX & MIPS architecture | Sun Mar 12 1989 15:17 | 2 |
Vote of confidence: yes
| |||||
| 748.3 | yes | COUNT0::WELSH | Tom Welsh, UK ITACT CASE Consultant | Sun Mar 12 1989 16:18 | 0 |
| 748.4 | Vote of Confidence | COOKIE::WITHERS | You know you can't memorize Zen | Sun Mar 12 1989 19:28 | 0 |
| 748.5 | another vote of confidence | MELKOR::HENSLEY | happy hacker~ | Sun Mar 12 1989 20:51 | 1 |
| 748.6 | Yes | HAMER::JILSON | Door handle to door handle | Sun Mar 12 1989 23:29 | 0 |
| 748.7 | Hear, hear! Yes! | SRFSUP::MCCARTHY | Moe! Larry! Cheese! | Mon Mar 13 1989 12:43 | 0 |
| 748.8 | STAR::MFOLEY | Rebel without a Clue | Mon Mar 13 1989 13:44 | 7 | |
Not to be a spoilsport or anything, but how many more ballots are going to be held? Can we get back to the regularly scheduled conference? mike | |||||
| 748.9 | JAHWOHL | WKRP::CHATTERJEE | A fool and your $$$ go to Wash DC | Wed Mar 15 1989 19:50 | 2 |
VOTE EARLY, AND VOTE OFTEN, and it is YES, YES, YES. Now, if only
I can make someone say the same to me.
| |||||
| 748.10 | Of course... | GUIDUK::BURKE | Doug just pawn, in chess game of life! | Mon Mar 27 1989 02:49 | 14 |
I'm at a loss as to why the subject of Moderator Bashing has become
so popular lately.
The moderators of this conference, like all of us are only human.
They have volunteered to spend much time keeping the conference
on track and within bounds.
It seems to me that when someone has an issue with a moderator,
it should be taken-up through mail, not here.
In my humble opinion, this particular subject has cluttered up the
conference in far too many topics.
Doug (a moderator of somewhat less emotional conferences)
| |||||