T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
---|
38.1 | | ULTRA::HERBISON | | Mon Jun 03 1985 21:50 | 26 |
| My group asked about this change when a personnel representative
was talking to our group about the reduced rate of pay increases
in the coming year.
We were told that the time period would be ignored if you transfer
into a group and discover that you do not fit in with the new group.
In this situation it is not in DECs interest to have you stay there.
But if a person can work with a group and do the job then DEC does
not want to pay that person to learn a new job every year. Reducing
the time spent teaching new jobs saves DEC money.
The effect that the increased period would have on me would be to
make sure that I liked a job before I took it. I don't think that
people looking for a better opportunity would be affected very much,
but people looking for a different opportunity each year would be.
It is not necessary for everyone to learn about this change, but
when a person thinks about changing jobs they should be able to
easily find out all DEC policies on changing jobs. The real
question is how should people know to look in P&P when they want
to change jobs. For that matter, how should people find out that
P&P exists in the first place? My only exposure to this book has
been the two time that people have mentioned this change in my
presence.
B.J.
|
38.2 | | GVAADG::ROUSSET | | Tue Jun 04 1985 13:09 | 18 |
| Re: 38.0
Three questions, since I did not even know that there was an orange book (what
we have here is "Digital and you" on Videotex):
1: Is the orange book specific to the US?
2: If not, is it possible to get a copy somewhere?
3: What do you mean by 12 months (non-exempt) and 24 months (exempt)?
Exempt of what?
Stephane Rousset
Application Development Group
Information Services
EHQ - Geneva, Switzerland
|
38.3 | | SIMON::SZETO | | Tue Jun 04 1985 14:43 | 17 |
| re .2
1. The policy manual in question is for U.S. only. Although there are
sections of that manual specifically marked "SCOPE: WORLDWIDE", the
employment policy in question is not so marked. This change in policy
may or may not affect employees outside U.S. Please check with your
local Personnel department.
2. If you are a U.S. employee and are interested in getting the manual,
see information in the next note (39.0).
3. "Wage Class 4, Salaried (exempt) - Employees who are compensated on
an annual salaried basis. Salaried employees do not record hours
worked and are not compensated for overtime hours."
Wage Classes 1, 2, and 3 are not exempt from U.S. laws regarding
overtime pay.
|
38.4 | | EVE::G_DAVIS | | Tue Jun 04 1985 23:02 | 6 |
| Glad to read that one! (.0) I've been snooping around the east
coast for a new challenge, and had assumed that it would be for one
years commitment. The last prospect that I met fell through, but
I would have had no qualms about staying for two years, and guaranteeing
it up front. I think it would make me look mVERY closely at
who I was posting to work for.
|
38.5 | | ERIE::BOWKER | | Wed Jun 05 1985 02:30 | 7 |
| Any good manager will spell out what he/she expects for a committment in a new
job. In the past the group I work in always asked for a 24 month committment.
I believe that 24 months is a reasonable amount of time for a WC-4,
especially considering the training (both formal and informal) that is given
to an employee in a new job.
Joe
|
38.6 | | NCMWVX::EVENSON | | Fri Jun 07 1985 05:57 | 17 |
| <FLAME ON>
Every job I have ever undertaken I have accepted as if it were for the rest
of my career. So far none of them have been, but it rubs me the wrong way
when people worry about how long they will stick with a assignment before
they ever start. I believe the speed at which people move from job to job
at DEC is a major problem for two reasons.
One, many people feel if they mess up, they can get to a new job before they
are found out.
Two, many people are perpetually learning and never give back to the corporation
the full amount they could if they did a job for a while after learning it.
For what it's worth, I have been with DEC 7 years as a sales rep and sales
manager in the same office.
<FLAME OFF>
|
38.7 | | NY1MM::SPRINGER | | Tue Jul 16 1985 17:02 | 8 |
| <flame on>
If asked for a two year committment to a job, I'd do it under the proviso
that the manager asking me gave me a committment that he/she would be my
manager for the same two years!
Namely, if managers change, bets are off. Why not? A new manager is a whole
new ballgame.
-Joe.
|
38.8 | | SYSENG::LYONS | | Tue Jul 16 1985 17:52 | 9 |
| RE: .7
No need to light that flame, your comment sounds like the cold
truth. A different manager (usually) makes it a different group.
Given that a person gives the new manager a chance to get acquainted
(and see if they are that different) I would not expect the two
year commitment to hold.
Bob L.
|
38.9 | | EDSVAX::CRESSEY | | Tue Jul 16 1985 20:25 | 8 |
| Re .7, .8:
Right, that's not a flame, in my book. If the manager perchance
leaves, all bets are off. To a lesser extent, the new manager also
may feel a certain liberty that the old one did not to 'encourage'
some people to move on.
Dave
|
38.10 | | MILVAX::KLEINBERGER | | Wed Jul 17 1985 13:09 | 28 |
| I am copying a note from another notefile, that may (or may not) belong here.
Any thoughts?
================================================================================
SNICKR::BLIUDNIKAS SOAPBOX, PART II 17-JUL-1985 07:31
Note #17.2 -{ No Picnic, No Fun }- 2 of 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There will be memos flying around regarding new rules and regulations
to this effect.
a. Q1 travel costs will be cut by 75% over Q4 FY'85 travel,
b. Mileage reimbursement will be stopped for exempt employees
c. No international travel
d. No external training
e. All outside consultants will be phased out
f. No agency contract employees
g. No company food/drink at meetings
h. Relocation benefits will be granted on an exception basis
i. No offsite meetings
j. No company sponsored activities
k. No temporary secretaries . . . .
And there will be more.
The old bag
|
38.11 | | EDSVAX::CRESSEY | | Wed Jul 17 1985 17:07 | 17 |
| This is a pretty reasonable note, for the SOAPBOX.
However, there is a problem with copying a note from the SOAPBOX
to another file, in general. The SOAPBOX has no rules, and some
of its contributors suspend some of their inhibitions concerning
NOTES, when writing in the box. Specifically, the author of this
note might have done considerably less research to verify the
veracity of what she was reporting than she would have done
if she had been about to post the same note in DIGITAL.
I have no evidence that this is so in this case, and I'm not trying
to start trouble between you and Gail(?). I'm just saying that
copying a note from one notesfile to another is generally accepted,
but might not be if the source is SOAPBOX and the destination is
a more trustworthy file.
Dave
|
38.12 | | DELPHI::BECK | | Wed Jul 17 1985 21:51 | 4 |
| I heard that the list referenced was a set of cost-saving measures under
consideration, but that no decision has been made to implement any of them.
FWIW
|
38.13 | | REGINA::LASKO | | Sun Jul 21 1985 14:30 | 7 |
| Re: .10 through .13 The axe has fallen (not everyone may have seen
it yet...as usual rumours fly through electrons, but far
reaching decisions come down the chain of command on paper)
I've started a new note on this subject
tim
|
38.14 | Open Letter to Palmer re. Financial Times | UFHIS::WMUELLER | Wolfgang Mueller @UFH Cust Trg Munich | Mon Feb 03 1997 14:34 | 47 |
| The following text has been sent today to: Bob Palmer, cc: Rando,
Copperman, Mullarkey, Dirkmann
Open letter to Robert B. Palmer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Digital Equipment Corporation
Dear Bob,
We learned from an article in the Financial Times of January 27 that
you blame the "inflexibility" of the European work force for problems
at Digital Equipment. You cite France and Germany as examples of
countries where it is particularly difficult to do business. On the
other hand, you mention the UK as the country where "the workforce is a
lot more flexible".
But obviously the present woes of Digital Equipment have nothing to do
with the "inflexible" European workforce. Digital's problems are not
limited to Europe. The IT market in Europe is expanding, and our
competitors' revenues and profits are increasing both in Europe and in
Germany, Europe's largest IT market. Digital Equipment, however, has
lost momentum with its letal downsizing and is loosing market share
every day. This is happening all over Europe, in the UK and in the US.
As the examples of HP, SGI and SUN, and even IBM Europe, clearly
demonstrate, it is not difficult to do business in Europe. But it is
difficult to do business with Digital.
We therefore ask you to refrain from resorting to excuses such as
"inflexible workforce", and ask you instead to concentrate on improving
the management of the corporation.
Finally, there are further facts which clearly contradict your
argument: The workforce in Germany is so "inflexible" that Digital has
managed to downsize it from 9,000 to 3,000 since 1992. That is a hard
blow. Of course Digital had to pay a high price for these cuts. But in
view of the social impact of corporate downsizing, this is only a small
comfort.
We strongly invite you to present your argument to our colleagues in
Germany.
Regards
Christian Brunkhorst
Chairman General Works Council
Digital Equipment Germany
|
38.15 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Mon Feb 03 1997 16:52 | 13 |
| > lost momentum with its letal downsizing and is loosing market share
Lethal.
Losing.
You really should spellcheck before you send a letter to the CEO of a
company.
Letters with such errors should go right into the trash. "English is
not my native tongue" is no excuse when something is important to you.
/john
|
38.16 | yikes lighten up | TROOA::MSCHNEIDER | martin.schneider@tro.mts.dec.com | Mon Feb 03 1997 21:28 | 3 |
| I think he might still get the jist of the message despite a few
typos. I would have sent the letter in German. I would also expect
the CEO of a major corporation to be able to deal with that.
|
38.17 | Heard of nit-picking?? | ULYSSE::virenq.vbo.dec.com::HEMMINGS | Lanterne Rouge | Tue Feb 04 1997 06:45 | 8 |
| re .15 and at the risk of ratholing an important topic .....
What a load of bombastic twaddle!!
Next time I get a note with US spelling, I shall toss it straight in the bin -
I suggest you try working with Europeans who can frequently express themselves
in 3 or 4 different languages, rather than Americans who have problems
most of the time with just the one.
|
38.18 | | POMPY::LESLIE | andy@reboot.demon.co.uk as of Feb 14 | Tue Feb 04 1997 08:07 | 7 |
| Well, John is at least bilingual and fluent in German and English.
I understand his position, but, on this occcasion, disagree.
The letter seemed to the point and not particulalrly confrontational.
I'll be interested if there is any response at all.
|
38.19 | | RUSURE::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Tue Feb 04 1997 12:06 | 13 |
| John didn't say anything about English versus non-English. His
comments on the letter were about correct versus incorrect. I don't
care what language a letter is in, when I write an important letter, I
take the time to make sure it is done right. If it were done in a
foreign language I were less than certain about, I would have it
carefully checked by somebody who knew the language.
-- edp
Public key fingerprint: 8e ad 63 61 ba 0c 26 86 32 0a 7d 28 db e7 6f 75
To find PGP, read note 2688.4 in Humane::IBMPC_Shareware.
|
38.20 | | SHRCTR::PJOHNSON | Vaya con huevos. | Tue Feb 04 1997 12:28 | 4 |
| I am noting in my journal that I am in complete agreement with Eric.
Now anything is possible! ;^)
Pete
|
38.21 | yeeesh! | NASEAM::READIO | A Smith & Wesson beats four aces, Tow trucks beat Chapman Locks | Tue Feb 04 1997 13:24 | 17 |
| In dealing with foreign entities, it is often a frequent occurrence that
the people tend to, occasionally, misspell words or swap word positioning.
I have often heard heads of state make these errors on national television.
I do not look upon these individuals as uneducated as some of you,
obviously, are. They have taken the time to make a point and, maybe, their
spellchecker offered that particular spelling as a valid word and never
even flagged it as a misspelling.
How often have YOU typed something like tow when you meant to type two? Do
you think your spellchecker will pick that one up?
..and who wrote that it should have been written in German. An open letter
written in German. Now THAT makes a lot of sense in a company where
English it the recognized corporate language.
Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.
|
38.22 | give 'em a break! | TARKIN::BEAVEN | New year, same old me | Tue Feb 04 1997 14:57 | 4 |
| FWIW - I think more empathy is called for, and less emphasis on perfection
of orthography and cryptography. Get a humane life!
Dick
|
38.23 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Feb 04 1997 16:37 | 14 |
38.24 | Just spell correctly | FUNYET::ANDERSON | Where's the nearest White Castle? | Tue Feb 04 1997 17:43 | 8 |
| Sorry, but there is no excuse for misspelling such an easy word as LOSING,
especially in an important message. I have seen similar spelling errors in
Digital documentation and presentations over the years, and it always reflects
badly on the writer or presenter.
And I understand nobody's perfect.
Paul
|
38.25 | | BUSY::SLAB | Candy'O, I need you ... | Tue Feb 04 1997 17:49 | 6 |
|
USA's CNET program used "it's" last night when they should have
used "its".
It was horrible.
|
38.26 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Ora, the Old Rural Amateur | Tue Feb 04 1997 21:29 | 10 |
38.27 | | COOKIE::FROEHLIN | Let's RAID the Internet! | Tue Feb 04 1997 21:45 | 4 |
| On the other hand you never know when a correctly spilled message might
be poofed read.
Gun (to avoid a spelling erra)
|
38.28 | Spelling =/ usage | CHEFS::PARRYD | Sez who? | Wed Feb 05 1997 07:31 | 1 |
| And "loosing" is not a misspelled word, just a (greatly) misused one.
|
38.29 | ? | JGODCL::KWIKKEL | | Wed Feb 05 1997 09:25 | 9 |
| Re: .16
hear hear....;^)
Claudio R. was here in Holland to speak publicly. I have never heard
so many times the words, "You know" inbetween centences before as he
did. Mannnnn!? these are the 90's........."as* ifffff!"
Jan. ;)
|
38.30 | | CHEFS::KERRELLD | To infinity and beyond... | Wed Feb 05 1997 11:00 | 10 |
| re.14:
Well done for addressing this back to Bob Palmer directly. Add my name to
the growing masses who are fed up with comments about the European
workforce. I wonder if Mr Palmer knows that the actions of his management
in the UK are driving up union membership? This in turn will lead to a less
flexible workforce. If he is so in favour of a flexible workforce then
should he not ask the UK management to stop?
Dave.
|
38.31 | Bob: what happened to "re-engineering the customer value chain"??? | BBPBV1::WALLACE | john wallace @ bbp. +44 860 675093 | Wed Feb 05 1997 11:32 | 20 |
| Dave,
Does anything lead you to believe that union membership of itself leads
to a less flexible workforce ? Look at it another way: management
behaviours such as have been seen in parts of Digital UK (and,
apparently, Europe) for the last n years *will inevitably* lead to a
less flexible (less motivated) workforce *and may* lead to increased
union membership (if the workforce perceive that as a possible solution
to the management problem). Increased union membership is a *symptom*
of the problem, not the *cause*.
Palmer would do well to spend more time *delivering* on his
"re-engineering the customer value chain" stuff, (remember that?)
whether his VPs like it or not, and less time p*ssing off the folks in
the field who actually deal with customers day after day, and are
constantly acting as apologists for our corporate organisational
incompetence.
regards
john
|
38.32 | Any teamsters out there? | MKTCRV::KMANNERINGS | | Wed Feb 05 1997 13:07 | 14 |
| re .30
>Mr Palmer knows that the actions of his management
>in the UK are driving up union membership?
Well more power to the trade union members in the UK. It is certainly
one of Mr P's main acheivements, getting thousands of computer industry
employees who are traditionally very sceptical of unions and their
bureaucracies to get a membership card.
..Kevin..
[Member of the Irish Services, Industrial, Professional, and Technical
Union (SIPTU)]
|
38.33 | mho | JULIET::ROYER | New Year - New Attitude! | Wed Feb 05 1997 14:06 | 17 |
| Can I add a bit of fuel to both sides of the fire, this is dying down a
bit.
USA today had an article in the Money Section. The article concerned
a statement made by a few other computer companies. They stated that
Europe is behind the technology curve, and the employees are not as
up to date.
My input on this, having taught in Munich and Frankfurt for Digital, is
that the Europeans are probably equal, they work hard, take more time
off, and enjoy life, but I think that they get the job done just the
same.
Probably a perception thing, and I believe that they can not set the
entire situtation.
Dave
|
38.34 | | SAPEC3::TRINH | SAP Technology Center | Thu Feb 06 1997 20:11 | 9 |
| Maybe an excellent example for the way Digital works: Take completely
irrelevant things serious, miss everything else.
I am not an admirer of Mr. Palmer, but I strongly believe he is not
that stupid to think only one second about lingual errors, if he reads
the letter at all.
Hung
Ps. Surely, tons of mistakes can be found in this reply. So?
|
38.35 | | BUSY::SLAB | Career Opportunity Week at DEC | Thu Feb 06 1997 20:24 | 6 |
|
RE: .34
The only obvious error is the missing "ly" that I would have added
to "serious". The rest is fine.
|
38.36 | ;^) A Modest Proposal ;^) | WHOS01::BOWERS | Dave Bowers, NSIS/IM | Mon Feb 10 1997 14:39 | 5 |
| I think that anyone who wants to criticize a noter's English spelling
and/or grammar should be free to do so -- in the noter's native
language!
\dave
|
38.38 | RE: 38.37 | TAMARA::TAMARA::CLARK | Lee Clark,DTN:381-0422,TeamLinks | Mon Feb 10 1997 18:56 | 6 |
| > Given that most of the people making serious errors in spelling and
> grammar are
> in these conferences are native English speakers, that should not be a
> problem.
Excellent demonstration!
|
38.37 | | DECCXL::WIBECAN | That's the way it is, in Engineering! | Mon Feb 10 1997 19:06 | 13 |
| >> I think that anyone who wants to criticize a noter's English spelling
>> and/or grammar should be free to do so -- in the noter's native
>> language!
Given that most of the people making serious errors in spelling and grammar in
these conferences are native English speakers, that should not be a problem.
I'd venture a hypothesis that there are more English spelling or grammar errors
per 1000 characters committed by native English speakers than by non-native
speakers. And I'm not even counting British versus American spelling and
usage conflicts.
Brian
|
38.39 | | DECCXL::WIBECAN | That's the way it is, in Engineering! | Mon Feb 10 1997 19:07 | 5 |
| >> Excellent demonstration!
I don't know what you're talking about! :-) Go back and read the note again...
Brian
|
38.40 | ya'll speak American up here? :) | KANATA::ZUTRAUEN | always lookin' to learn | Mon Feb 10 1997 19:15 | 13 |
| re.37
I presume I should always use U.S. (note: not "American" - since I am one
also) spelling for all my Co. correspondence then..... gimme a break!
Reminds me of that U.S. woman on the tour bus in Canada:
"You all speak American up here?" :)
Your NeighboUr up north,
Pete ;)
|
38.41 | | COVERT::COVERT | John R. Covert | Tue Feb 11 1997 04:00 | 33 |
38.42 | comments from Scott McNealy | GIDDAY::BACOT | | Tue Feb 11 1997 04:18 | 30 |
| Interesting comments (on spell checking) from the chairman, president,
founder of Sun Microsystems.
Taken from his speech to the Australian National Press Club.
Printed in 'The Australian' Tuesday Ocotber 22, 1996.
"...and probably another message I should share with you all is go ASCII.
ASCII is basically the most simple format for formatting characters.
It's just what your keyboard does.
And, I don't want people to send me a Word document on an e-mail.
I want them to send me in ASCII, with typos, not right hand
justified, no special fonts and no colours, any information they want
me to get, because I don't have the time to wait for them to format it
and then use up network bandwidth to send it to me.
And then I've got to de-crypt it. I mean Word is like encryption
to me. And then I've got to de-crypt it somehow.
If you've got something to say to me send it to me with typos.
By the way, people said you can't communicate with your customers without
formatting and right hand justifying and spell checking.
And I say, yes I do.
I say, I don't have the time. I do a couple of hundred e-mails a day.
And, oh by the way, when it has a typo they know it came from me.
I don't have a spell checker, I have a spell wrecker.
It's a personalised e-mail from me every time."
|
38.43 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Ora, the Old Rural Amateur | Tue Feb 11 1997 07:15 | 33 |
38.44 | McNealy on PowerPoint | TROOA::RJUNEAU | | Tue Feb 11 1997 11:55 | 17 |
| RE: .42 (Scott McNealy's comments on e-mail)
McNealy also has nice things to say about PowerPoint. From the Jan. '97
Byte:
"When the anthropologists dust off the 1980s and 1990s and look at the
productivity dip, they're going to blame [Microsoft] Office. I banned
PowerPoint from my company and we've had the best two quarters we've
ever had in the history of the company. I want to give everybody
plastic Mylar sheets and all the pens they need to scribble on them.
And I said use what I call the [Sun cofounder] Bill Joy font. You
can see where he licked his thumb and erases; it's so much faster."
Hmmm... now that I think about it, maybe that's what's happened to
our marketing dollars. We do get a lot of PowerPoint presentations,
don't we? Must take a lot of effort to get all those IR documents
in Word...
|
38.45 | apply tools only where needed, please | XAPPL::DEVRIES | downsized: your footage may vary | Tue Feb 11 1997 13:01 | 16 |
| Ah, but if you don't have anything to say, then you can say it *much* better
with fonts and graphics and colo(u)rs. :-)
Reminds me of a customer I ran into at DECUS several years ago. He had just
obtained our premier markup-based document formatting software and was
marveling at his power to make pretty marks on paper. His comment:
I love VAX DOCUMENT. It's the only thing I know where you can
put garbage in and get great stuff out!
Since he was a customer, I didn't bother to point out that what he was
getting out what just nicely-formatted garbage. :-)
Three cheers for Scott McNealy and the "make it simple and real" movement.
-Mark
|
38.46 | and what is not good for Microsoft | AXEL::FOLEY | http://axel.zko.dec.com | Tue Feb 11 1997 13:06 | 13 |
|
Methinks that Scott McNealy is expounding on ASCII because he
hasn't solved the bandwith problem of a Network Computer
environment. Also funny that he calls Word "encryption" yet
is on a high horse about HTML. Scott only does what is good
for Scott.
Ok, did anyone catch any spelling errors in John and Ora's
replies??
mike
|
38.47 | Language Rules are for Communications Efficiency | UNXA::ZASLAW | Steve Zaslaw | Tue Feb 11 1997 16:41 | 19 |
| > I say, I don't have the time. I do a couple of hundred e-mails a day.
> And, oh by the way, when it has a typo they know it came from me.
> I don't have a spell checker, I have a spell wrecker.
> It's a personalised e-mail from me every time.
Yes, if got an e-mail from Scott McNealy, I would take the time to try to
figure out what he was trying to say despite any spelling, usage, or grammar
errors. But when I get one from Joe Blow, or look at his notes post, I'm not
going to make the same effort to decode it.
He doesn't have the time indeed. His minions can put in some extra time in
reading/re-reading so he can save time in writing. For less lofty mortals, it's
just rude to the reader not to take the time to be as clear and easy to read as
possible. And it's that much less likely your message will be understood or
consideration given to your ideas.
(Naturally, non-native speakers can only be admired for their efforts to
communicate in a foreign language. I do agree, however, that a native-language
editor should be consulted on so important an effort as a letter to the CEO.)
|
38.48 | look at the message | AIMTEC::JOHNSON_R | | Tue Feb 11 1997 17:22 | 16 |
| I doubt those 2 spelling errors will cause the company to lose any
money. Some people cant seem to grasp the content of the message.
Reminds me of some of our processes we have around here.
Keep trying till you get it spelled right, then we might read it.
Sorry customer you have to call back the same number you just dialed
and press 4-2-7-3-8-4-1. No, I cant transfer you. You have to do it
our way.
I cant understand why we get caught up in how someone spelled a word
and not just try to understand what they are trying to say.
Later,
RJ
|
38.49 | Do we speak "ebonics" at work? | SYOMV::FOLEY | Instant Gratification takes too long | Tue Feb 11 1997 23:29 | 15 |
| Speaking only for myself (something my wife says I can do :-)
I consider bad grammar and spelling to be indicative of the general
"dumbing" of society in general. Maybe it's just the Beavis and
Butthead factor, but I really hate it when things aren't "right".
Now your definition of what's "right" may vary from mine, but I was
taught a certain way, and generally try to achieve "correct" syntax,
grammar and spelling. In an informal setting such as Notes> typos
occur, and go uncorrected and it's no big deal, but for "formal"
letters to "important" people, I feel that content should be letter
perfect.
There, I feel better now...
.mike.
|
38.50 | is spell check one word or two?? | GIDDAY::BACOT | | Wed Feb 12 1997 00:55 | 33 |
| from note 38.46
>> Methinks that Scott McNealy is expounding on ASCII because he
>> hasn't solved the bandwith problem of a Network Computer
>> environment. Also funny that he calls Word "encryption" yet
>> is on a high horse about HTML. Scott only does what is good
>> for Scott.
While I don't disagree that what Scott is proposing isn't good for
Scott the point seems to be is that if it's in Microsoft Word format,
rather than HTML or ASCII, you're pretty well locked into having to
have Microsoft Word running on a Microsoft OS to do much with it.
That's with the understanding that viewers and converters are available in
other products such as TeamLinks.
Use of correct spelling and grammar is important, it allows us to
reduce confusion and to achieve clarity of expression. I don't think
that correct spelling and grammar are more important than the
content of the message though.
I found Scott's opinion interesting in comparison to the idea of
'throw it in the trash if there is a spelling error', expressed
earlier in this string.
Regards,
Angela
|
38.51 | sorry folks, spelling is not easy ! | VNABRW::SCHULZE | | Wed Feb 12 1997 06:47 | 12 |
| Years back there was a discussion in the German weekly magazin "Spiegel"
about correct spelling in German.
The journalists did a test with the bavarian minister for culture, with
a solid background of course in german, greek and latin. They testet
this really well educated guy with maybe 10 sentences in German. Guess
what happened: there were about ten spelling errors (capital letters,
colons and so on ...) in these few sentences.
Conclusion to me: some gurus fool millions of people - mistrust
everybody who tells you he/she is correct in spelling ! And be
tolerant.
|
38.52 | | METSYS::THOMPSON | | Wed Feb 12 1997 07:17 | 11 |
|
I bet the real reason Scott McNealy doesn't like Powerpoint are all the PC's
on peoples desks that are needed to write them. He's getting a glimpse into
the future irrelevance of his own probucts!. HTML JAVA etc. do run so they
are ok.
Preparing a presentation on Powerpoint can be as quick drawing on foils, you
have to spend hours getting it all perfect.
M
|
38.53 | | SAPEC3::TRINH | SAP Technology Center | Wed Feb 12 1997 07:36 | 15 |
| re .51
Also years back there was a meeting between chinese students and Dr.
Bernhard Vogel, former governor of Germany's federal state
Rheinland-Pfalz. Dr. Vogel was corrected several times by the Chineses
because he wasn't even able to pronounce the word "China" in german(!)
correctly. Nethertheless, he is one of the most respected politicians
in Germany, not only by chinese students.
Care about correct spelling. Care much more about contents.
Care about people whoever he is. Why care more about CEOs? They send
you mails with correct spelling, but the mails say nothing.
Hung
|
38.54 | From PPT to ... | GVAADG::PERINO | Le gai savoir | Wed Feb 12 1997 08:20 | 46 |
38.55 | | VAXCAT::LAURIE | Desktop Consultant, Project Enterprise | Wed Feb 12 1997 08:35 | 5 |
| RE: .49
Well said, Mike!
Cheers, Laurie.
|
38.57 | | BHAJEE::JAERVINEN | Ora, the Old Rural Amateur | Wed Feb 12 1997 10:10 | 11 |
38.58 | Non-native | MEDINA::MULLER | | Wed Feb 12 1997 10:34 | 47 |
38.59 | | REGENT::POWERS | | Wed Feb 12 1997 11:57 | 46 |
| > <<< Note 38.48 by AIMTEC::JOHNSON_R >>>
> -< look at the message >-
>
> I doubt those 2 spelling errors will cause the company to lose any
> money. Some people cant seem to grasp the content of the message.
> .....
> I cant understand why we get caught up in how someone spelled a word
> and not just try to understand what they are trying to say.
I'll grant that it's sometimes silly how people can get carried away
when we're talking about grammar and spelling. But if the point
is communication, then you have to understand that the message
is carried in the medium of written language, and that message
must be extracted from the medium by the reader.
In fact, many of the most common errors found in this file and elsewhere
change the content of the intended message.
"Loose" and "lose" are two different verbs, one much more active
than the other.
"Than" and "then" are two different parts of speech. ("More clouds than sun"
and "more clouds, then sun" are two different weather forecasts.)
"Formerly" and "formally" sound much alike, but modify their contexts
in very different ways.
The confusion between the personal pronouns (whose/its/theirs/your)
with the contractions (who's/it's/there's/you're) makes sentences
unparsable or ambiguous.
Spell checkers have little to do with it.
You can construct innumerable sentences that play with sound-alikes
and demonstrate that spell checkers are silly.
What matters is understanding the language you are writing in and using
its conventions to clearly communicate your intent.
It's the writer's message. Shouldn't the writer care whether the message
can be extracted in a comprehensible way?
Is making hundreds of readers spend extra time reading a message to make
sense out of it better than a writer taking the extra time once to make
it clear in the first place?
They were right in junior high school when they told you good writing
skills were important.
- tom]
|
38.60 | | RUSURE::EDP | Always mount a scratch monkey. | Wed Feb 12 1997 12:02 | 18 |
| Re .48:
> I cant understand why we get caught up in how someone spelled a word
> and not just try to understand what they are trying to say.
The spelling errors will not cause any trouble understanding what the
author intends to say. They will affect the perception of the author.
A well-written letter is evidence of a thoughtful person putting effort
into communication. A poor letter is evidence of an upset person
ranting for a moment.
-- edp
Public key fingerprint: 8e ad 63 61 ba 0c 26 86 32 0a 7d 28 db e7 6f 75
To find PGP, read note 2688.4 in Humane::IBMPC_Shareware.
|
38.61 | whatever | 13058::WESTERVELT | | Wed Feb 12 1997 18:07 | 8 |
|
Come on, folks. We're talking, for the most part, about words
we learn in "grammar" school. It's not that hard to learn the
difference between its & it's, there & their, lose & loose, etc.
Of course, typos happen.
Tom
|
38.62 | humor intended (whether or not it's evident!) | XAPPL::DEVRIES | downsized: your footage may vary | Thu Feb 13 1997 16:37 | 23 |
| re: .60
> A poor letter is evidence of an upset person ranting for a moment.
Unless it's evidence of a perfectly calm, rational person attempting to
communicate in a non-native language, or a person who has some perceptual
or communicative disorder such as dyslexia, or some other syndrome...
re: .61
> typos happen
Gee, that oughta (sic) be a bumper sticker! Tho (sic) I spose (sic) it
would be more effective and demonstrative of the problem if it said
TYPOES HAPPEN
or maybe
TYPOS HAPEPN
-Mark
|
38.63 | | smurf.zk3.dec.com::wolf95.zk3.dec.com::pbeck | Paul Beck at pbeck@zk3.dec.com | Thu Feb 13 1997 18:16 | 2 |
| These problems would be much less frequent if people just spent a
little more time proffreading.
|