[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

3831.0. "Line/Circuit utilization for PhaseIV" by HANNAH::B_COBB () Wed Sep 30 1992 12:20

    When I say :
    
    MCC>show node4 router1 line syn-0 all statistic
    
    The items OUTBOUND UTILIZATION AND INBOUND UTILIZATION appear.
    
    How do I calculate TOTAL utilization on the line?  If I add the inbound
    to the outbound together, sometimes I get a number that is greater that
    100%.  I have set the line speed of SYN-0 to 128000 for a 128K line.
    
    Also, if I want to look at the use of the 128k line, should I be
    looking at the circuit ot line line utilzation?  I basically want
    to know how much of the 128K bandwidth is being used.
    
    Thanks for any help
    
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
3831.1Maybe I'm oversimplifying...TOOK::MCPHERSONpre-retinal integrationWed Sep 30 1992 12:4417
>    How do I calculate TOTAL utilization on the line?  If I add the inbound
>    to the outbound together, sometimes I get a number that is greater that
>    100%.  I have set the line speed of SYN-0 to 128000 for a 128K line.
>    
>    Also, if I want to look at the use of the 128k line, should I be
>    looking at the circuit ot line line utilzation?  I basically want
>    to know how much of the 128K bandwidth is being used.

    If it's a full-duplex link, then don't you (essentially) have a 128k in
    the 'send' direction and 128k in the 'receive' direction, right?  

    Does it really make sense to ask for 'Total Utilization'  for a
    full-duplex link ?   

    /doug


3831.2HANNAH::B_COBBWed Sep 30 1992 13:117
    It is a standard 128k DLN that we have.  Now that I think of it, you
    are probably accurate with the Duplex statement.  
    
    I guess I overlooked the obvious.
    
    Thanks for the help