| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hi, The mcc_da_ routines are not documented in the SRM, why not ? Who can provide me with reference documentation ? I want to make use of the mcc_da_ routines in a customer project, Any particular reason why I should NOT use them in a customer project ? EricV.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2691.1 | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Mon Apr 06 1992 12:27 | 6 | |
They were written back when Phase IV DECnet on VMS only was thought to
be the only generic low-level networking interface needed by AMs.
Obviously the world has changed. There are now so many combinations
of transports and platforms that it is best left to each AM to
implement.
| |||||
| 2691.2 | Hm... | KETJE::VDKERCKHOVE | Never say NEVER | Tue Apr 07 1992 11:42 | 3 |
Hm, Can we use them in customer projects and where are they documented ? | |||||
| 2691.3 | TOOK::SWIST | Jim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102 | Tue Apr 07 1992 12:48 | 7 | |
They are gone. If you need a phase IV VMS decnet interface, use the
standard QIO interface (you will notice that the mcc_da interface was
a *very* thin wrapper over the QIO interface).
And as I stated earlier, if you need any other decnet combination
(Phase V, Ultrix), the mcc_da routines weren't applicable anyway.
| |||||