| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Hi, Does anyone know whether our MSU can be used to manage the Fibronix FDDI bridge (FX8210) via SNMP ? Where can we get their MIB info ? We have a 2M project that the basic requirement is to manage the network from a single NMS. The customer has already installed several Fibronix FX8210 FDDI bridges so if our MSU or DECmcc cannot be used to manage these existing Fibronix devices, we are out. We have contacted the local Fibronix distributor and they refuse to pass us the MIB info. So please help. It is very urgent. Thank a lot in advance. Best regards, Kin PS: this note has been posted in MSU and MCC.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2033.1 | YAHEY::BOSE | Wed Jan 08 1992 13:30 | 20 | ||
>> We have contacted the local Fibronix distributor and they refuse to pass >> us the MIB info. That is very strange since almost all mibs are in the public domain and available on the Internet. The question is do they have a private mib extension, or have they just implemented MIB II ? They might also have implemented the experimental FDDI mib (which is shipped with our kit). You have to find out what exactly their agent supports. If it is MIB II and the experimental FDDI mib, then you are all set. If they have their own private extensions, then we need to get hold of their mib definition which should be in the concise mib format (RFC 1212). I guess what I am trying to get at is that both DECmcc and MSU should be able to support the Fibronix FDDI bridges once you can get all the relevant information from them. Rahul. | |||||