[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

1572.0. "WANdesigner alive?" by HGRNCC::FARADAYCHONG (Faraday Chong@hgo [852]8614396) Wed Oct 02 1991 02:30

    I posted questions on DECmcc WANdesigner in notes MOLAR::WANdesigner,
    that conference seems inactive for months, and no wonder, I did not get
    any replies so far.
    
    Is WANdesigner still alive?
    Who is the product manager?
    
    Faraday
    
           <<< MOLAR::MKNME_USER:[NOTES$LIBRARY]WANDESIGNER.NOTE;2 >>>
                            -< DECmcc WANdesigner >-
================================================================================
Note 59.0               Presentation material? Doc? Kit?              No replies
HGRNCC::FARADAYCHONG "Faraday Chong@hgo [852]861439" 10 lines  27-SEP-1991 05:08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Need helps for a prospective WANdesigner sales:
    
    (1) Is there customer presentation material available? If not, any
    internal material that we can customize for presentation/
    
    (2) Are manuals available online for self education purpose?
    
    (3) Is kit available online for demo purpose?
    
    Faraday
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
1572.1WANdesigner Kit PointersDELNI::S_LANETue Oct 08 1991 15:0316
    
    
    	Faraday,
    
    	Yes, WANdesigner is alive as a product although there are is no
    	current development work to enhance the V1.0 product underway.
    	The kit and demo script (data on traffic, equipment types, tariffs,
    	etc. to be read into WANdesigner) were "misplaced" in a cluster
    	upgrade.  The kit has been returned and the pointers in the WAN-
    	designer Notes Conference are once again correct (seen Note 1.2).
    	
    
    	Rgds,
    
    	Steve