[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:	DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:	Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:	TAEC::BEROUD

Created:	Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:	Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:	Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:	6497
Total number of notes:	27359

1540.0. "DECmcc V1.2 Graphing utility questions" by TENERE::HAYES (A European Telecomet ...) Tue Sep 24 1991 11:08

	

	Hello,
	


I have some questions about the DECmcc V1.2 real time graphing utility.

It is said that unsignedX, integerX, CounterX, 
LcounterX, Bolean and real data types is supported.

My question relates to this example :

      TYPE RoutingCost = 58 RECORD 
        LocalCall    = 1 : Unsigned8;
        ExternalCall = 2 : Unsigned8;
        X25Call      = 3 : Unsigned8;
        END ;

Let's imagine an object called Routing Path. A status 
attribute (Cost) is defined as being of data type 
RoutingCost.

1) - Will the generic real time graphing utility be able to 
     graph the LocalCall, ExternalCall and X25Call 
     attributes ?

2) - If no, why not, will it ever be supported?

The reason for using Record data type, is that it gives 
a better user representation by sub-grouping 
attributes. 

                   Best regards 


			Catherine

T.R	Title	User	Personal Name	Date	Lines
1540.1	Graphs support simple data types	TOOK::A_MOORE		`Tue Sep 24 1991 12:13`	10
	The real time graph supports simple datatypes. It does not support constucted data types. The why is: it takes more engineering time to do more complicated datatypes. We have to justify bells and whistles by defining user benefit or competitive advantage. Feel free to give examples of customer benefit of this feature for future versions. Al Moore
1540.2	Largest european SVP partner...	TENERE::HAYES	A European Telecomet ...	`Wed Sep 25 1991 06:32`	18
	This was directly extracted from a requirement of my preferred customer, which is not only a customer but also an SVP partner, and not only an SVP partner, but the largest european SVP partner. Guess who... Thanks for your quick answer Best Regards Catherine
1540.3		TOOK::CALLANDER	MCC = My Constant Companion	`Wed Sep 25 1991 21:32`	27
	RE: .1 My question relates to this example : TYPE RoutingCost = 58 RECORD LocalCall = 1 : Unsigned8; ExternalCall = 2 : Unsigned8; X25Call = 3 : Unsigned8; END ; Let's imagine an object called Routing Path. A status attribute (Cost) is defined as being of data type RoutingCost. 1) - Will the generic real time graphing utility be able to graph the LocalCall, ExternalCall and X25Call attributes ? Cathrine, please note that LocalCall, ExternalCall, and X25Call are NOT attributes based upon the definition you supplied. Instead they are portions of an attribute value. As stated by Al we will be able to graph attribute of primitive types (numerics). I understand the subfield idea but by doing such they have created a complex attribute, and not the three attributes that they meant to return.
1540.4	You have three attributes, not one record	BLUMON::SYLOR	Architect = Buzzword Generator	`Thu Oct 24 1991 10:57`	5
	This is a great example of why attributes of type record cause difficulties, but defining each field of the record as a separate attribute would work far better. I doubt very much that there is any reason why the 3 fields must appear as one attribute, they are almost always treated as separate values.