[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

969.0. "Will SYNONYM capabilities be possible ?" by CUJO::HILL () Mon Apr 29 1991 17:07

    What plans, if any, exist for allowing a any entity (e.g., DOMAIN) to
    be referenced by a SYNONYM in the same manner as the NODE4 global
    class?
    
    For example, I have been using domains to represent LAN segments based
    on the corresponding Ethernim segment number.
    
    	DOMAIN Name = .o.segment26.DEC_SEG
    
    I would like to use a synonym DEC_SEG.   Will such a thing be possible?
    
    -Dan
T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
969.1not for the domain global entityPOLE::LEMMONThu May 02 1991 15:355
    Currently there isn't a system wide synonym mechanism.  It is 
    up to the MM to support them.  There are no plans to implement
    synonym support for the domain global entity.
    
    /Jim
969.2Creating a synonym for a domainCLAUDI::PETERSMon May 06 1991 18:4814
Although what you really want is unsupported by DECmcc, you can use the DNS$CONTROL program
to create a LINK (which is what synonyms are anyway).

DNS> CREATE LINK abc DESTINATION xxx.yyy.zzz

Note that the above LINK is created in the root of the namespace.  So you
want to be careful of the number of these you create.  Alternatively you
can create a directory with a short name and use it for the links.

DNS> CREATE LINK a.bc DESTINATION xxx.yyy.zzz

I tried it in my configuration and it works fine.

/Claudia
969.3What about "masking" or "hiding" in future DECmcc releases?CUJO::HILLTue May 07 1991 03:1216
    Thanks, Claudia, I'll give it a try.
    
    By the way,  what I am really interested in providing for my customer
    is the ability to be able to do a "FIND" in the ICONIC MAP for a
    specific entity without having to specify a long and confusing name.  I
    also want to refer to the entity on the map using the synonym for
    simplicity's sake.   I understand that a form of "masking" will be
    possible with a future version of DECmcc.
    
    	Example:  The entity .o.abcd.west.MYNODE would have the
    		  .o.abcd.west portion of its name "masked" or hidden and 
    		  would reveal only .MYNODE on the map, but would I still
    		  be able to "FIND" the entity without having to type the
    		  entity's full name?
    
    -dan 
969.4re.3BARREL::LEMMONFri May 17 1991 18:1510
    The only "masking" being considered for v1.2 is to display the
    rightmost simplename of the name.  If the user wants to see
    the entire instance name they can do a "show identifiers" on it. 
    
    The Find operation was enhanced a bit to allow for a partial 
    match.  (e.g., "Find ABC will match on .abc or .xxx.yyy.abc or
    .abc.xyz, or...) 
    
    /Jim
    
969.5TOOK::F_MESSINGERFri May 17 1991 18:459
Actually, what is being planned is to, by default, display
the rightmost simple name for every entity on the map.
If the user wants to expand the name of a given entity
he can MB2 the entity and see menu items which say
something like "Expand Name, Expand all name " or whatever.
When the user selects on of the options, the map will be updated.

Fred
969.6TOOK::SWISTJim Swist LKG2-2/T2 DTN 226-7102Fri May 17 1991 18:493
    you better make sure snmp entities are involved in any decision
    regarding which part of the fullname is significant.