| Title: | DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT. |
| Notice: | Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187 |
| Moderator: | TAEC::BEROUD |
| Created: | Mon Aug 21 1989 |
| Last Modified: | Wed Jun 04 1997 |
| Last Successful Update: | Fri Jun 06 1997 |
| Number of topics: | 6497 |
| Total number of notes: | 27359 |
Is it possible now (a few months before DECmcc Ultrix is launching) to
qualify the effort for porting a customer/partner written AM from
DECmcc VMS V1.1 to DECmcc Ultrix V1.2. Not in terms of how long (man
days) that takes, but in terms of "what has to be changed ?"
This is really important for us, because we are dealing with "unix
shops" who have to start today with their AM development work.
Tks & Rgds.
| T.R | Title | User | Personal Name | Date | Lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 830.1 | not as bad as it sounds | TOOK::CALLANDER | Sat Mar 23 1991 16:40 | 22 | |
I am not an Ultirx wizard so I hope Jim S will chime in here, but I can
tell you this.
The length of time will be directlry proportional to the following
items:
- coding conventions (good style)
- use of VMS services
- size of AM
The hardest to port was the VMs specific services, like the use of SMG
in the FCL PM forms mode (which we still don'ty have working). As to
the majority of the rest of it an awful lot of it was simply getting to
the code to compile on ultrix (VMS compile standard=portable will
give you an idea as to where you stand right now).
Overall the modules porting now that more of the base system functions
are working are finding the task a lot easier. If you are in-house and
doing the port you might want to talk to Jim Swist for his helpful
programming hints (a number of memos he has writen on the subject).
jill
| |||||
| 830.2 | good news ? | SUOSW4::HARDT | Daniel Hardt,EIS/Germany,765-5286 | Mon Mar 25 1991 08:27 | 8 |
If i understand Jill correctly then portability can be guaranteed by
- good coding behaviour (ANSI C ?)
- eliminating VMS specifics as far as possible (?)
Regarding the 2nd i have the impression that everything (also qio's)
is captured by MCC$call routines and the Ultrix toolkit might offer the
same layer, so it would not be necessary to use VMS vehicles ??!
| |||||