[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference azur::mcc

Title:DECmcc user notes file. Does not replace IPMT.
Notice:Use IPMT for problems. Newsletter location in note 6187
Moderator:TAEC::BEROUD
Created:Mon Aug 21 1989
Last Modified:Wed Jun 04 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:6497
Total number of notes:27359

689.0. "Error during successful installation of TS AM" by OSLACT::BJORN (Once again) Wed Feb 06 1991 05:18

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
689.1being worked.GOSTE::CALLANDERWed Feb 06 1991 18:199
    nope...
    
    I am currently attempting to debug the problem I have no idea
    what is  happening, but you are not the first to see it (though
    the other report was on another AM). Thanks for reporting it. I
    will get back to you if I need more information.
    
    jill
    
689.2bad message, no attributes for show or set verbGOSTE::CALLANDERTue Feb 12 1991 20:068
    The error message you were seeing was because PTB hit an unexpected
    condition. It found a (most likely) show directive with no attributes
    defined for the entity. A fix to change the message to make more
    sence will be added to PTB. It should simply be a warning, this
    will NOT effect  your tables.
    
    thanks for reporting it.
    
689.3SCRPIO::LIZBICKITue Feb 12 1991 20:1516
   Jill - 

   Is it worth displaying a warning message in this case?  Displaying
   the warning message may result in as many questions from the customers
   as the current error message.

   I have also looked further into this situation.  The entity that
   is causing the problem is the Terminal_Server Internet ARP entity.
   This entity is not fully supported, the only valid directive is
   SHOW ALL IDENT, with no identifiers (since there is only one instance
   per parent...)

   I will add a note to the Terminal Server AM release notes, indicating
   that this message may be ignored.

689.4to be qaredGOSTE::CALLANDERTue Feb 12 1991 20:4410
    Actually Lynne it really isn't. For now thought I am kind of stuck.
    We have already started the 30 day quiet time and I can get 
    string changes through alot easier then logic changes. But since
    we allow shows of null identifier partitions (which is my guess
    of what you have) with no other attributes required, this is no
    longer even a warning condition.
    
    jill
    (BTW I will qar this)