| >>I am trying to register a PhaseV router so that I can manage it from MCC.
Due to datatype restrictions, PhaseV nodes are not supported for the
Configuration directives.
>>However I am using a private namespace and I am having problems in
>>registering the node in DNS.
The fact that you are using a private namespace, doesn't matter except
that you would get an Access Control error if you were using the
corporate namespace.
>>When I type
>>MCC> reg node "ncl00"
>>Node "ncl00"
>>AT 20-FEB-1990 14:47:11
>>Registration Successful
Currently, if you went into your namespace with DNS$CONTROL, you should find
an `nc100' object directly under the root, `cause that is where you said
to put it.
>>All appears to be okay - however it is not in DNS, and the NODE directory is
>>empty (MCC> dir node *).
Don't know why DIRECTORY didn't work, we'll check on it. However, at
the current time, MCC can't put the alternate identifiers (addresses)
in, so you can't use MCC to REGISTER a PhaseV node like NCL does.
The PhaseV team is looking at it and will respond.
...kjn
|
| Thanks for the info, but I have checked the root directory and there is no
object there (I also used DNS$BROWSER to check that it wasn't hidden elsewhere).
Here is a log of the session...
$ mcc
DECmcc (T0.1.0)
MCC> register node "ncl00"
Node "ncl00"
AT 20-FEB-1990 21:43:38
Registration Successful
MCC> dir node *
MCC>
MCC>
Exit
$ r sys$system:dns$control
DNS>
DNS> show dir . kn obj
Object _____ phase5_ch
DNS> exit
$
I don't know if this is of any use to you. Also, if I can't register a PhaseV
node in DNS yet is it possible to manage it from MCC? - if so how?
Cheers
Ian
|
| Are you trying to set up an entry for the NCL00 node that we are providing
for testing here in Reading? If so, I might have a workround for you
(depending on what you are trying to do).
I am happy to set up NCL00 so that it maintains the DNA$TOWERS attribute of
the name DEC:.ENG.NAC.WACE.SC.NCL00 (I will need to bring it up to date with
the latest software to be able to do this so it won't happen straight away).
This would mean that you could use that as a FullName to refer to the node.
I don't suppose that that will help as far as MCC is concerned because I
don't think its Phase V AM can initiate connections using that towers
information yet. What attributes of the name *does* MCC use, if any?
Graham
|