Conference vaxaxp::vmsnotes

650.0. "LTDRIVER and TNDRIVER crashes!!!!" by FORAT::PONS () Tue May 27 1997 08:56

	Hello,

	A customer that have a cluster with two VAX 6610 OpenVMS 6.2.
	next list the products and ecos installed have the next crashes.
        Before the customer report a crash that after check in Canasta
	application give an exact match and recomend installation of
	eco 6 for Decnet/OSI 6.3, but the customer don't install this because
	have a SWIFT application that only was tested until eco 5.

	Before escalate call, please somebody can look the information and 
	giveme something about???

	Thanks in advance,
	Jordi 
	





		VAXO		14-MAY-1997

6.2
INCONSTATE
NONE
NONE
6000-610
13000202
0
FFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFF
82F2E7E3
04080000
SOBGTR
LTDRIVER
87E3
********************************************************
		VAXF		20-MAY-1997


6.2
INCONSTATE
NONE
NONE
6000-610
13000202
0
FFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFF
FFFFFFFF
830FCFA3
04080000
SOBGTR
LTDRIVER
87E3

***********************************************************************
			VAXF		19-MAY-1997
6.2
INVEXCEPTN
SYMBIONT_611
NONE
6000-610
13000202
5
00000C
0
00000000
8301A422
04080000
CMPB
TNDRIVER
1BA2

*******************************************************************************
$UCX SHOW VERION

  Digital TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS VAX Version V4.1 - ECO Level 5
  on a VAX 6000-610 running OpenVMS V6.2    

$MC NCL
NCL>show implmentation
Node 0 
at 1997-05-22-10:56:54.414+01:00Iinf

Characteristics

    Implementation                    = 
       {
          [
          Name = OpenVMS VAX ,
          Version = "V6.2    "
          ] ,
          [
          Name = DECnet/OSI for OpenVMS ,
          Version = "DECnet/OSI for OpenVMS Version V6.3-ECO05 26-AUG-1996 17:02:21.78"
          ]
       }



Directory SYS$COMMON:[SYSHLP]

A1030.RELEASE_NOTES;1                   A1_MUPA030.RELEASE_NOTES;1
AES012.RELEASE_NOTES;3                  BASIC037.RELEASE_NOTES;2
CC040.RELEASE_NOTES;1                   CC052.RELEASE_NOTES;4
CC053.RELEASE_NOTES;1                   CDAPAT011.RELEASE_NOTES;1
CDD053.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  CMS036.RELEASE_NOTES;1
CMS038.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  COBOL052.RELEASE_NOTES;1
COBOL053.RELEASE_NOTES;1                COBOLRTL053.RELEASE_NOTES;1
CONTRLVAX041.RELEASE_NOTES;3            CRT060.RELEASE_NOTES;5
CSCPAT_0513013.RELEASE_NOTES;2          CSCPAT_1015014.RELEASE_NOTES;1
CSCPAT_1015017.RELEASE_NOTES;1          CSCPAT_1162010.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DCPS012.RELEASE_NOTES;1                 DCPS013.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DCPSVAXC010.RELEASE_NOTES;4             DCPS_MA011.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DECFAX012.RELEASE_NOTES;1               DECNET_OSI-V6_3.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DECRDB051.RELEASE_NOTES;1               DECRDB051_ECO3.RELEASE_NOTES;2
DECRDB060.RELEASE_NOTES;1               DECRDB060_ECO5.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DECSET112.RELEASE_NOTES;1               DECSET121.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DECW$MOTIF012.RELEASE_NOTES;2           DECW$MOTIFU3012.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DNVOSI063ECO05.RELEASE_NOTES;1          DTM035.RELEASE_NOTES;1
DTM037.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  ENVMGR011.RELEASE_NOTES;1
ESS030.RELEASE_NOTES;2                  FORT064.RELEASE_NOTES;1
INSTRUCTORVAX041.RELEASE_NOTES;3        LPS050.RELEASE_NOTES;1
LSE042.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  LSE044.RELEASE_NOTES;1
MMS027.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  MMS031.RELEASE_NOTES;1
PCA042.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  PCA044.RELEASE_NOTES;1
PERFECTCACHE053.RELEASE_NOTES;1         PERFECTDISK072.RELEASE_NOTES;1
PERFECTTUNE045.RELEASE_NOTES;2          RALLY040.RELEASE_NOTES;3
RAXMASTER053.RELEASE_NOTES;1            RAXMASTER054.RELEASE_NOTES;2
RAXMASTER062.RELEASE_NOTES;1            RSU022.RELEASE_NOTES;1
RTMONVAX020.RELEASE_NOTES;3             RTR011.RELEASE_NOTES;2
RXVAX063.RELEASE_NOTES;1                SCA042.RELEASE_NOTES;1
SCA044.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  SDD031.RELEASE_NOTES;1
SNACST012.RELEASE_NOTES;2               SNALU0023.RELEASE_NOTES;1
SNALU0024.RELEASE_NOTES;1               SNALU62022.RELEASE_NOTES;1
SNALU62023.RELEASE_NOTES;1              SNAPRE$012.RELEASE_NOTES;2
SNARJE014.RELEASE_NOTES;1               SNATE015.RELEASE_NOTES;1
SNATE016.RELEASE_NOTES;1                SQLSRV051.RELEASE_NOTES;2
SQLSRV060.RELEASE_NOTES;2               SQLSRV060_ECO02.RELEASE_NOTES;2
SSL09U.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  ST400.RELEASE_NOTES;14
TNT010.RELEASE_NOTES;1                  UCX031.RELEASE_NOTES;1
UCX032.RELEASE_NOTES;2                  UCX041.RELEASE_NOTES;1
UCXVAX_E5041.RELEASE_NOTES;2            ULTRADISK011.RELEASE_NOTES;2
VAXC032.RELEASE_NOTES;1                 VAXCMAR04_062.RELEASE_NOTES;2
VAXDDTM01_070.RELEASE_NOTES;1           VAXDRIV03_070.RELEASE_NOTES;1
VAXDRIV04_070.RELEASE_NOTES;2           VAXF11C01_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1
VAXF11X02_070.RELEASE_NOTES;1           VAXLIBR06_070.RELEASE_NOTES;2
VAXMOTF07_U3012.RELEASE_NOTES;2         VAXMTAA02_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1
VAXPRTS01_070.RELEASE_NOTES;1           VAXQMAN01_070.RELEASE_NOTES;1
VAXRMS01_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1            VAXSHAD05_062.RELEASE_NOTES;2
VAXSMUP03_060.RELEASE_NOTES;5           VAXSYS01_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1
VAXSYS02_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1            VAXSYS02_070.RELEASE_NOTES;1
VAXSYS03_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1            VAXSYS06_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1
VAXSYS07_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1            VAXSYS11_U2055.RELEASE_NOTES;2
VAXSYSL01_062.RELEASE_NOTES;1           

Total of 105 files.

>        Before the customer report a crash that after check in Canasta
>        application give an exact match and recomend installation of
>        eco 6 for Decnet/OSI 6.3, but the customer don't install this because
>        have a SWIFT application that only was tested until eco 5.

Did i understand correctly that the problem is clearly already known and
that eco 6 solves it? So why would you escalate this? Can't the customer
test the eco on a test system with their application to make sure it works
okay?

Jur.

    Jur,
    
    The crash that canasta report an exact was a different type.
    The information that is reported in .0 is for a other crashes and is 
    possible that at bottom the source of problem was the same, I don't
    know.
    
    Jordi