[Search for users] [Overall Top Noters] [List of all Conferences] [Download this site]

Conference decwet::networker

Title:NetWorker
Notice:kits - 12-14, problem reporting - 41.*, basics 1-100
Moderator:DECWET::RANDALL.com::lenox
Created:Thu Oct 10 1996
Last Modified:Fri Jun 06 1997
Last Successful Update:Fri Jun 06 1997
Number of topics:750
Total number of notes:3361

206.0. "NETWORKER ON WNT - LABEL ERROR NETWORKER WNT - LABEL ERROR networker Wnt error" by ULYSSE::BAILLY () Fri Dec 06 1996 08:09

T.RTitleUserPersonal
Name
DateLines
206.1DECWET::KOWALSKITime's not for savingFri Dec 06 1996 10:5512
206.2still have the error MSG 'Monitor in progress'ULYSSE::BAILLYTue Dec 10 1996 08:3722
206.3just a few questions...DECWET::LENOXTue Dec 10 1996 11:1120
206.4More information on the configurationULYSSE::BAILLYWed Dec 11 1996 05:3024
206.5DECWET::LENOXWed Dec 11 1996 11:0728
206.6More informationULYSSE::BAILLYThu Dec 12 1996 03:5824
206.7.6 without enabler/auth codesDECWET::LENOXThu Dec 12 1996 11:3333
206.8DECWET::LENOXThu Dec 12 1996 11:4229
206.9 Cannot label the tapeULYSSE::BAILLYWed Dec 18 1996 03:3511
206.10saying other software works is not helpful on NTDECWET::LENOXno time, no timeWed Dec 18 1996 10:4317
206.11 more info on registryULYSSE::BAILLYMon Dec 30 1996 08:3634
206.12this is indicating an NT or hardware problem, IMHO...DECWET::LENOXack, I'm a coyote!Mon Dec 30 1996 11:5625
206.13DECWET::KOWALSKITime's not for savingMon Dec 30 1996 16:0619
206.14Same problem, 4mm OKSWETSC::WESTERBACKPanta reiTue Jan 28 1997 06:2132
    I'm having what seems to be the same problem on an Intel machine
    running NT 3.51, SP4. Tape is FR-PCXLT-AB, that's the DLT between
    TZ87 and TZ88, called XT, holding 15/30 GB per tape.
    
    After installing NSR 4.3 from Legato, I deleted the tape device, as
    it had the default 4mm DAT, and instead created a new with type
    dlttape.
    
    Now I had big problems labelling and mounting a tape. Mostly I just got
    a popup saying "Monitoring device in progress on \\.\Tape0", and in
    the device box it said things like "monitoring device, moving backwards
    two files". Strange thing was that when I tried to just label, without 
    mounting, I sometimes managed to get the labelling interface, and could
    fill it in. But then I still couldn't mount, just said monitoring...
    
    Any way I let it be for an hour or so, and suddenly when I looked it
    was mounted! And that tape has been no problem mounting since. But I
    can't repeat it with another tape. Another thing was that if I tried
    using an old tape (earlier used on VMS) I got the "...current blocksize
    is incorrect" message. Had to erase it from NT backup on another
    machine, then labelling got the above result.
    
    Now, I got the tip to try changing back from dlttape to 4mm. And now
    labelling and mounting works like a dream... Also using old tapes is
    OK, even though I get an informational message about the incorrect 
    blocksize.
    
    OK, so what's the deal? Should I use 4mm for all tapes? What's the
    difference does it make in using either? 
    
    Rgds,
    Hans                             
206.15DECWET::KOWALSKITime's not for savingTue Jan 28 1997 11:0224
First, you received the "monitoring" messages because
you had "Auto media management" turned on for the
device.  Your subsequent inabilities to do a manual
label/mount were due to that feature.  If you want
to fly the beast yourself, turn off the auto-pilot first
(i.e., set "Auto media management" to "No").

Second, I suspect your troubles with the tape were
exactly due to what you said, they were old or
brand new or written by some obsure operating system
and had not been used by NetWorker
before.  I would suggest you manually erase 
(NetWorker does not have an erase facility) and
manually label (with NetWorker) such tapes.
NT backup or mt (smokem if you got em) will erase
the tapes.

It really doesn't matter whether you set NetWorker's
device type to "dlt" or "4mm", NetWorker will use
the device's loaded NT device driver regardless.
The type is more an operator informational convenience
in this case.

Mark
206.16That's it!SWETSC::WESTERBACKPanta reiWed Jan 29 1997 05:248
    Thanks,
    
    the AMM must've been the culprit. Not that I remember setting it 
    to Yes, abd now I had the 4mm device as No. But recreating dlt device
    with AMM set to No, makes it OK to label all tapes, old ones also.
    
    Hans